UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


(Mark One)
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
2020
 
OR

 
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to ___________
 
Commission file number 000-26621
egov-20201231_g1.jpg
NIC INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
Delaware52-2077581
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)
 
25501 West Valley Parkway, Suite 300, Olathe, Kansas 66061
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (877) 234-3468


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
 
Title of Each ClassTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per shareEGOVThe Nasdaq Stock Market, LLC


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
___________


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  þ
No  ¨


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes  ¨ No  þ


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  þ No  ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer þ
Accelerated Filer
Accelerated filer¨
Non-accelerated filer¨
Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨



If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act. ¨


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of
the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C.
7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes  ¨ No  þ


As of June 30, 2018,2020, the aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $1.0$1.5 billion based on the closing price as reported by the Nasdaq Stock Market.


On February 11, 2019,24, 2021, the registrant had 66,632,914 67,192,898shares of common stock outstanding.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE


Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be issued in connection with its Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 20192021 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.






TABLE OF CONTENTS
NIC INC.
FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
Page






PART I


CAUTIONS ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). See the "Cautions About Forward-Looking Statements" section in Part II, Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report for more information regarding these statements.


AVAILABLE INFORMATION


Our website address is http://www.egov.com. Through this website, weWe make available, free of charge, on the Investor Relations section of our website (http://www.egov.com/investor-relationsir.egov.com) our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports (if any), as soon as reasonably practicable after these reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We also make available through our website other reports filed with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including our proxy statements and reports filed by officers and directors under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. We do not intend for information contained inon our website to be part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


The SEC maintains a website (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information that we file electronically with the SEC.


FREQUENTLY USED TERMS


In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we use the terms “NIC,” “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” to refer to NIC Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires. All references to years, unless otherwise noted, refer to our fiscal year, which ends on December 31. We use the term “portal” to refer to digital government services outsourced to NIC, as well as our subsidiary operations. We use the term “enterprise-wide” to refer to our portalsstate enterprise businesses that provide state-wide services to multiple government agencies. We also use the term “partner” to refer to our government clients, with whom we have contractual relationships to provide digital government services.


INDUSTRY AND MARKET DATA


Industry and market data and survey and study results disclosed in this Form 10-K were obtained from industry, university, public interest, government and general publications. We have not independently verified the industry and market data or survey or study results obtained from these publications. Actual future industry and market conditions and results may differ materially from the conditions and results forecasted or reported in these publications.


ITEM 1. BUSINESS


Business Overview


NIC is a leading provider of digital government services and payment solutions that help governments use technology to provide a higher level of service to businesses and citizens and to increase efficiencies.efficiencies for all. We accomplish this currently through two channels: our primary outsourced portalstate enterprise businesses and our software & services businesses.

In our primary outsourced portalstate enterprise businesses, we generally enter into multi-year contracts with state and local governments to design, build, and operate internet-based solutionsdigital government services on an enterprise-wide basis on a government'stheir behalf. TheseThe digital government solutionsservices that we build allow businesses and citizens to access government information onlinedigitally via a variety of connected devices and complete secure payments and transactions, such as applying for a permit,permits, retrieving government records, or filing a government-mandated formforms or report. Thereports. Under our unique state enterprise business model, supporting mostwe generate revenues from transaction fees collected for the digital government services we operate on behalf of our long-term contracts is a transaction-based business model where we absorb the costs to build the technical infrastructure and develop digital government services. After a service has launched, we and our government partners share a portion of the fees generated from the online transactions, which are paid by the end users of the service.partners. Our government partners benefit by reducing their financial and technological risks, increasing their operational efficiencies,



1


avoiding costs and gaining a centralized, customer focused digital presence, on the internet, while businesses and citizens receive a


1


faster, more convenient, and more cost-effective means to interact with government. We are typically responsible for funding the up-front investments and ongoing operations and maintenance costs of the digital government solutions.services.


We typically enter into multi-year contracts with our government partners and manage operations for each contractual relationship through separate local subsidiaries that operate as decentralized businesses with a high degree of autonomy. Our business plan is to increase our revenues by increasing digital adoption of existing services, delivering new services to a growing number of government entities within our existing contractual relationships, and by signing long-term contracts with new government partners.


OurIn our software & services businesses, we provide certain stand-alone software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) solutions relating to payment processing, healthcare and licensing, software development, COVID-19 testing solutions and other digital government services, other than those provided on an enterprise-wide basis, to federal, state and local governments.

Segment Information

As of December 31, 2020, our three reportable segments were: 1) State Enterprise; 2) Payments; and 3) TourHealth. In 2019, we had only one reportable segment, State Enterprise. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company made a change from one to two reportable segments, State Enterprise and Payments, which was based on quantitative and qualitative considerations, and was a result of recent changes in our reporting structure to reclassify the Texas payment processing contract from the state enterprise category to the software & services category. In August 2020, we launched TourHealth, a rapid and secure COVID-19 testing solution. Based on quantitative considerations and evaluation of our reporting structure, we determined TourHealth to be a third reportable segment beginning in the fourth quarter of 2020. The revised reportable segments reflect the way we evaluate our business performance and manage our operations. All prior year amounts have been restated to conform to the current year presentation.

Our State Enterprise reportable segment generally includes our subsidiaries that provide digital government services and payment processing on an enterprise-wide basis for state and local governments. Our Payments reportable segment includes our subsidiaries that operate in our software & services business and provide certain payment processing-related, transaction-based services mainly to state and local agencies in states where we do not maintain an enterprise-wide contract. Our TourHealth reportable segment includes our subsidiary that provides COVID-19 testing to government and government-related entities. The All Other category primarily includeincludes our subsidiaries that provide software development and digital government services, other than outsourcedthose provided on an enterprise-wide basis, to federal agencies, as well as state and local governments as well as federal agencies.and government-related entities.


Segment Information

Our Outsourced Portals segment is our only reportable segment and generally includes our subsidiaries that provide digital government services on an enterprise-wide basis for state and local governments. The Other Software & Services category primarily includes our subsidiaries that provide software development, payment processing and other digital government services, other than outsourced on an enterprise-wide basis, to state and local governments as well as federal agencies. For additionalfinancial information relating toabout our reportable and operating segments, please refer to Note 13, Reportable Segments and Related Information, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Industry Background


The market for business-to-government and citizen-to-government transactions


Government regulation of commercial and consumer activities requires billions of transactions and exchanges of large volumes of information between government agencies and the businesses they regulate and the citizens they serve. These transactions and exchanges include, but are not limited to, motor vehicle driver history record retrieval, motor vehicle registrations, tax returns, permit applications and requests for government-gathered information. Government agencies typically defray the cost of processing these transactions and of storing, retrieving and distributing information through a combination of general tax revenues, service fees and charges for direct access to public records.


The limits of traditional government transaction methods


Traditionally, government agencies have transacted, and in many cases, continue to transact, with businesses and citizens using processes that are inconvenient and labor-intensive, require extensive paperwork, and use outmoded technology and security procedures and large amounts of scarce staff resources. Transactions and information requests are often made in person or by mail, which increases the potential for the compromise of sensitive personal information or errors that require revisions and follow-ups, particularly if the transactions and information requested are processed manually. Even newer methods


2


rely on multiple systems and potentially incompatible data formats and require significant expertise and expenditures to introduce and maintain. As a result, businesses and citizens often have no choice but to face costly delays to complete essential tasks. These delays include waiting in line at a government agency, for answers by telephone, for responses by mail, or for payments by check. In addition, government agencies may not use modern secure methods of online payment, leaving businesses and citizens unable to pay certain fees online or at the counter using credit/debit cards or electronic checks or cash, or government agencies may require advance payments rather than payments from monthly billing. Businesses and citizens encounter further inconvenience and delay because they can usually work with government agencies only during normal business hours. Even when online alternatives are available, they often require a cumbersome process of multiple contacts with different government agencies or offer a limited number of payment methods. Increases in the level of economic activity and in the population have exacerbated these problems and increased the demand for newthese services.




2



Challenges to the implementation of digital government services


Despite the potential benefits of digital government services, barriers to creating successful internet-baseddigital services may preclude governments from implementing them. Some of these barriers are similar to those the private sector encounters, including:


the high cost of implementing and maintaining secure infrastructure and new technology in a budget-constrained environment;
the need to quickly assess the requirements of potential customers and cost-effectively design and implement digital government services that are tailored to meet these requirements;
the intense competition for qualified technical personnel; and
the need for updated internet and mobile friendlymobile-friendly payment methods that are secure and compliant with Payment Card Industry Data Security Standards (“PCI DSS”).


Governments also face some unique challenges that exacerbate the difficulty of advancing digital services, including:


lengthy and potentially politically chargedpolitically-charged appropriations processes that make it difficult for governments to acquire resources, and to develop digital services quickly;quickly and sustain funding over time;
a diverse and substantially autonomous group of government agencies that have adopted varying and fragmented approaches to providing information and transactions online;
a lack of marketing expertise to design services that meet the needs of businesses and citizens, to increase the awareness of the availability of the services and to drive adoption of the online service delivery channel;
security and privacy concerns that are amplified by the confidential nature of the information and transactions available from and conducted with governments and the view that government information is part of the public trust;
changes in administration and turnover in government personnel among influencers and key decision makers; and
compliance requirements associated with accepting credit/debit card and electronic check payments.


We believe many private sector service providers generally do not address the unique requirements of digital government services. MostIn our experience, many service providers do not fully understand and are not well-equipped to deal with the unique political, regulatory and security environments of governments. These providers including large systems integrators, frequently take a time-and-materials, project-based pricing approach or provide “off-the-shelf” solutions, often designed for other commercial industries that may not adequately address the needs of government.




3


What We Provide to Governments


We provide digital government services and payment solutions designed to meet the needs of governments, businesses and citizens. The key elements of our service delivery are:


Customer-focused, one-stop government


Using our marketing, security and technical expertise and our government experience, we generally design, build, and operate digital government services and payment solutions for our government partners that are designed to meet their needs as well as those of the businesses and citizens they serve. Our enterprise-wide portalssolutions are designed to create a single point of digital presence online that allows businesses and citizens to reach every government agency in a specific jurisdiction from one online location.at any time and any place regardless of device. We strive to employ a common look and feel for all government agencies associated with each state’s internet-baseddigital solutions and make them useful, appealing and easy to use. We also develop applicationsservices that allow businesses and citizens to complete processes that have traditionally required separate offline interactions with several different government agencies or older generation electronic access. These applicationsservices permit businesses and citizens to conduct transactions with government agencies and to obtain information 24 hours per day and seven days per week using the latest technology and payment methods. We also



3


help our government partners generate awareness and educate businesses and citizens about the availability and potential benefits of digital government services.services and payment solutions.


Compelling and flexible financial models for governments


With our business model, we allow governments to implement digital government services and payment solutions at minimal cost and risk. We take on the responsibility and cost of designing, building and operating digital government services, with minimal use of government resources. We employ our technological resources and accumulated expertise to help governments avoid the risks of selecting and investing in new and often untested technologies that may be implemented by unproven third-party providers. We implement our services rapidly, efficiently and accurately, using our well-tested and reliable infrastructure and processes. Once we establish a portal and the applications associated applications,with our state enterprise business, we typically manage transaction flows, data exchange and payment processing, market our services to citizens and webusinesses, and fund ongoing costs from the fees received from end users, who access the government information and conduct transactions through the portal.transactions. We are also able to provide specific fee-based applications, software-as-a-service (“SaaS”)SaaS solutions and other digital solutions to governments who cannot or do not wish to usefund services using a variety of other funding models other than the transaction-based funding model.


Focused relationshippartnership with governments


We form relationshipspartnerships with governments by developing an in-depth understanding of their interests and then aligning our interests with theirs. By tying our revenues to the development of successful services, and applications, we demonstrate to government agencies and constituents that we are focused on their needs. Moreover, we have pioneered and encourage our partners to adopt a model for digital government policymakinggovernance that often involves the formation of oversight boards to bring together interested government agencies, business and consumer groups and other vested interest constituencies in a single forum. In some instances, we work with a master contract partner or single agency with authority to deploy enterprise services. We work within this forum to maintain constant contact with government agencies and constituents and enlist their participation in the development of digital government services. We attempt to understand and facilitate the resolution of potential disputes among these participants to maximize the benefits of our services. We also design our services to observe relevant privacy and security regulations, so that they meet the same high standards of integrity, confidentiality and public service as government agencies strive to observe in their own actions.







4



Outsourced Government Contracts


State enterprise-wideenterprise contracts

The following is a summary of the state contracts through which the Company generates meaningful revenue and has been contracted to provide enterprise-wide digital government services to multiple government agencies:

NIC Enterprise ContractState
Year Services
Commenced
Contract Expiration DateRenewal Options Through
NICUSA, IL DivisionIllinois20176/29/20236/29/2027
Louisiana Interactive, LLCLouisiana20151/28/2020
Connecticut Interactive, LLCConnecticut20141/9/2020
Wisconsin Interactive Network, LLCWisconsin20135/12/20215/13/2023
Pennsylvania Interactive, LLCPennsylvania201211/30/201911/30/2022
NICUSA, OR DivisionOregon201111/22/2021
NICUSA, MD Division Maryland20118/10/2019
Mississippi Interactive, LLCMississippi201112/31/201912/31/2021
New Jersey Interactive, LLCNew Jersey20094/30/20204/30/2022
West Virginia Interactive, LLCWest Virginia20076/30/20216/30/2024
Vermont Information Consortium, LLCVermont20066/8/2019
Colorado Interactive, LLCColorado20054/30/20224/30/2023
South Carolina Interactive, LLCSouth Carolina20057/15/20197/15/2021
Kentucky Interactive, LLCKentucky20038/31/2020
Alabama Interactive, LLCAlabama20023/19/20203/19/2022
Rhode Island Interactive, LLCRhode Island20017/1/2019
Oklahoma Interactive, LLCOklahoma20013/31/2020
Montana Interactive, LLCMontana200112/31/201912/31/2020
Hawaii Information Consortium, LLCHawaii20001/3/2020
Idaho Information Consortium, LLCIdaho20006/30/2019
Utah Interactive, LLCUtah19996/5/2019
Maine Information Network, LLCMaine19996/30/2020
Arkansas Information Consortium, LLCArkansas19976/30/2019
Indiana Interactive, LLCIndiana199510/24/2021
Nebraska Interactive, LLCNebraska19953/31/20243/31/2026
Kansas Information Consortium, LLCKansas199212/31/202212/31/2026






5



Our state master contracts typically authorize our subsidiaries to design, build and operate a wide range of digital government services and payment solutions that facilitate interactions between government agencies and businesses or citizens. These are typically multi-year contracts that permit any state agency to engage our local subsidiary to develop and provide digital services by executing a statement of work, subject to the approval and oversight of our master contract partner or an oversight authority established by the master contract or applicable law. In manymost cases, our subsidiaries are also able to use these contracts to provide services for county and city governments within the state. Under the transaction-funded business model most commonly contemplated in these master contracts, our subsidiaries earn revenue through transaction fees paid by end users in exchange for convenient and secure access to the services that we provide. These chargesfees support the operation and maintenance of the services, as well as compensate our subsidiaries for the up-front investment and ongoing costs incurred in developingto develop and maintainingmaintain the services, all costs that would otherwise be incurred by the state. Our subsidiaries also utilize a portion of the revenue from these fees to develop additional digital government services that cannot be supported through transaction-based funding, either because the service would not have sufficient use, or the type of service is not compatible with charging a fee.


We typically own the intellectual property in connection with the applicationsservices we develop under our state enterprise-wide contracts. After completion of a defined contract term, our government partner typically receives a perpetual, royalty-free license to use the applications and digital government services we built only in its own state. However, certain proprietary customer management, billing, and payment processing software applications that we have developed and standardized centrally, and that are utilized by our portal businesses, are provided to the vast majority of our government partners on a SaaS basis, and thus would not be included in any royalty-free license. If our contract expires after a defined term or if our contract is terminated by our government partner for cause, the government partner would be entitled to take over the services in place, and NIC would have no future revenue from, or obligation to, such former government partner, except as otherwise provided in the contract. In our portalstate enterprise business we also provide services to certain states (New Mexico and Texas) where we do not maintain an enterprise-wide digital government services contract. InAlso, in some cases, we enter into contracts to provide application development and portal management services to governments in exchange for an agreed-upon fee.


We also enter into statements of work with various agencies and divisions of our government partners for digital access to data and to conduct other citizen-to-government and business-to-government transactions. These statements of work preliminarily establish the pricing of the onlinedigital transactions and data access services we provide and the statutory amounts we must remit to the agency. These terms are then submitted to the policy-making and fee approval authorityoversight board or governing agency for approval. Generally, our contracts provide that the amount of any fees we retain is set by governments to provide us with a reasonable return or profit. We have limited control over the level of fees we are permitted to retain. Any changes made to the amount or percentage of fees retained by us, or to the amounts charged for the services offered, could materially affect the profitability of the respective contract. We have the general ability to control certain of our expenses in the event of a reduction in the amount or percentage of fees we retain; however, there may be a lag in the time it takes to do so should we determine it is necessary.


Any renewal of these contracts beyond the initial term by the government is optional and a government may terminate its contract prior to the expiration date if we breach a material contractual obligation and fail to cure such breach within a specified period or upon the occurrence of other events or circumstances specified in the contract. In addition, 15

Software & services contracts under which we provide enterprise-wide

Generally, our software & services contracts consist of SaaS solutions, including payment processing services, software development, COVID-19 testing solutions and other digital government services, as well as ourservices. We have contracts with certain Federal agencies, including a contract with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ("FMCSA"(“FMCSA”), can be terminated by the other party without cause on a specified period of notice. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 45% of our total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018. In the event any of these contracts are terminated without cause, the terms of the respective contract may require the government to pay us a fee in order to continue to use our applications in its portal.

Outsourced federal contract

Our subsidiary, NIC Federal, LLC (“NIC Federal”), within our software & services business, has a contract with the FMCSA to develop and manage the FMCSA’s Pre-Employment Screening Program (“PSP”) for motor carriers nationwide, using the Company’s transaction-based business model. In February 2019, the FMCSA extended the current contract through August 27, 2019, which includes three six-month renewal options.

The loss of the contract as a result of the expiration, termination or failure to renew the contract, if not replaced, could significantly reduce our revenues and profitability. Any changes made to the amount or percentage of fees retained by us, or to the amounts charged for the services offered, could materially affect the profitability of this contract.


The Company also has contracts with certain government and government-related entities to




65



provide rapid and secure COVID-19 testing through its TourHealth solution, featuring digital engagement, assessment and scheduling, as well as in-person clinical testing and logistics.

Termination without cause contracts

We have 14 state enterprise contracts and three software & services contracts under which the Company provides digital government services that can be terminated by the other party without cause on a specified period of notice. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 48% of our total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. If any of these contracts is terminated without cause, the terms of the respective contract may require the government to pay us a fee to continue to use the digital applications.

Expiring contracts


We currently have 1011 contracts under which we provide enterprise-wide digital government services, as well as our contract with the FMCSA, that have expiration dates within the 12-month period following December 31, 2018.2020. Although certainfive of these contracts have renewal provisions, any renewal is at the option of our government partners, who may choose to not renew the contract, to re-open bidding for the services, to take over the services in place and provide services internally, or to allow individual government agencies to retain the services of their own providers. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 31%28% of our total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020. As described above, if a contract expires after a defined term, the government partner would be entitled to take over the services in place and NIC would have no future revenue from, or obligation to, such former government partner, except as otherwise provided in the contract. In addition, TourHealth's contracts for COVID-19 testing services only extend into the first quarter of 2021.

As previously disclosed, Texas NICUSA, LLC (“Texas NICUSA”) was selected to provide payment processing services set forth in the Texas.gov 3.0 Procurement RFO (the “Texas RFO”) but was not selected to provide enterprise-wide services for portal operations, maintenance and development. The legacy contract between the state of Texas and Texas NICUSA expired on August 31, 2018 and the new payment processing services contract commenced on September 1, 2018. The legacy Texas contract accounted for approximately 14%, 20% and 20% of our total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, revenues from the legacy Texas contract were approximately $49.0 million, $65.7 million and $62.2 million, respectively.
The contract under which our subsidiary, NICUSA Inc. (“NICUSA”),the Company managed enterprise-wide digital government services for the state of TennesseeTexas expired on MarchAugust 31, 2017. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016,2018. The expired Texas contract accounted for approximately 14% of our total consolidated revenues for 2018. Revenues from the Tennesseethis legacy contract were approximately $1.8$49.0 million for 2018.
New contract developments
During the fourth quarter of 2020, we were awarded a five-year contract with the state of Florida to provide payment processing services, which includes an option for the state to extend the contract for one five-year period. Under this transaction-funded contract, we have the ability to provide payment processing services to all state agencies and $7.5 million, respectively.local governments in the state of Florida.


TheDuring the fourth quarter of 2020, we were awarded a five-year contract under which our subsidiary, Iowa Interactive, LLC (“II”), managed digital government services forwith the state of Iowa expired on June 30, 2016. II provided transitionto provide enterprise-wide digital government services, as required bywhich includes an option for the state to extend the contract through November 30, 2016. Forfor up to an additional five years.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, revenues fromsecond half 2020, we were awarded contracts with the Iowa contract were approximately $1.6 million.states of Florida, South Carolina and Kansas, the Alabama Department of Corrections and the University of Mississippi to provide our TourHealth rapid and secure COVID-19 testing solution.


Sources of Revenues


We currently earn revenues from three main sources: transaction-based fees, software development and services and portal management.fixed-fee services. Transaction-based revenues and fixed-fee revenues are generally recurring while development revenues are generally non-recurring. Each of these revenue types areis further described below.


Transaction-based:
IGS: our state enterprise businesses earn fees from a wide variety of interactive government services, referred to as IGS, from sources other than digital access to motor vehicle driver history records, for transactions conducted by businesses and end-user consumers.
Transaction-based:


6
IGS: our portal business earns transaction-based fees, which are generally recurring, from interactive government services, referred to as IGS, from sources other than digital access to motor vehicle driver history records, for transactions conducted by business users and consumer users through our services.
DHR: our portal business earns transaction-based fees, which are generally recurring, from driver history records, referred to as DHR, for providing digital access to motor vehicle driver history records from our partner states to data resellers, insurance companies, and other pre-authorized customers on behalf of our state partners.
Other: our software & services business earns a significant portion of its revenues from transaction-based fees, which are generally recurring, most notably via NIC Federal's contract with the FMCSA to develop and manage the PSP for motor carriers nationwide.

Software development
DHR: our state enterprise businesses earn fees from driver history records, referred to as DHR, for providing digital access to motor vehicle driver history records from our partner states to authorized data resellers, insurance companies, and other pre-authorized customers on behalf of our state partners.
Other: our software & services: businesses earn a significant portion of their revenues from transaction-based fees, which are generally recurring, most notably via our payment processing contracts with state and local governments that are not part of an enterprise-wide state contract, our contract with the FMCSA to develop and manage the PSP for motor carriers nationwide, our contract to provide digital services for Recreation.gov, and certain TourHealth contracts to provide COVID-19 testing on a per test basis.
Development services: we earn revenues from the performance of software development projects and other time and materials services for our government partners. While we actively market these services, they do not have the same degree of predictability as our transaction-based or portal management revenues and are generally not recurring.
fixed-fee services.
Portal management:Fixed-fee services: we earn fixed-fee revenues which are generally recurring, from the performancemanagement of fixed fee portal managementdigital government services for our government partner in the state of Indiana.
Indiana, certain TourHealth contracts for COVID-19 testing, and other contracts for SaaS subscription-based services.




7



The following table reflects the underlying sources of revenues as a percentage of total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31:

Percentage of Revenues: 2018 2017 2016Percentage of Revenues:202020192018
Transaction-based 95% 95% 94%Transaction-based82 %95 %95 %
Software development & services 4% 3% 4%
Portal management 1% 2% 2%
Development servicesDevelopment services%%%
Fixed-fee servicesFixed-fee services11 %%%


The following table identifies each type of service, consumer and state partner that accounted for 10% or more of our total consolidated revenues in any of the past three years:
Percentage of Total Revenues
202020192018
Type of Service
Motor Vehicle Driver History Record Retrieval19 %26 %29 %
Motor Vehicle Registrations11 %11 %14 %
TourHealth COVID-19 Services13 %N/AN/A
Consumer
LexisNexis Risk Solutions11 %15 %19 %
State Partner
Colorado(1)
N/A10 %N/A
Texas(2)
N/AN/A17 %
 Percentage of Total Consolidated Revenues
 2018 2017 2016
Type of Service     
Motor Vehicle Driver History Record Retrieval29% 31% 33%
(This is the highest volume, most commercially valuable service the Company offers)     
      
Motor Vehicle Registrations14% 14% 14%
      
Consumer     
LexisNexis Risk Solutions19% 19% 22%
(Resells motor vehicle driver history records to the insurance industry)     
      
State Partner     
Texas17% 20% 20%
(2018 consists of the legacy and new payment processing contracts)     
(1) The Colorado contract expires on April 30, 2022.
(2) Texas consists of the legacy state enterprise contract through August 31, 2018 and the payments contract, which commenced on September 1, 2018.

Our government partners enter into contracts with authorized data resellers, including various contracts with LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which are generally self-renewing until canceled by one side or the other, and generally may be terminated at any time after a 30-day notice. These contracts may be terminated immediately at the option of any party upon a material breach of the contract by the other party. Furthermore, these contracts are immediately terminable if the state statute allowing for the public release of these records is repealed.




7


Service Offerings


We work with our federal, state and local government partners to develop, manage, and enhance comprehensive enterprise-wide, digital government services and payment solutions for their constituents. Our enterprise-wide portalssolutions are designed to provide citizen-centric, user-friendly, convenient, secure multi-channel access, including mobile access, to in-demand government information and services, and include numerous fee-based transaction services and applications that we have developed. These fee-based services and applications allow businesses and citizens to access constantly changing government information and to file necessary government documents. The types of services and the fees charged vary according to the unique preferences of that jurisdiction. To reduce the frustration businesses and citizens often encounter when dealing with multiple government agencies, we handle cross-agency communications whenever feasible and shield businesses and citizens from the complexity of older, mainframe-based systems that agencies commonly use, creating an intuitive and efficient interaction with governments. We also provide industry-compliant payment processing systemssolutions that accommodate credit/debit cards and electronic checks, as applicable. Some of the higher volume and in-demand digital government services we offer in different jurisdictions include:








8



Product or ServiceDescriptionPrimary Users
Business Registrations and RenewalsAllows business owners to search for and reserve a business name, submit and pay for the business registration, and renew the business registration on an annual basis.Businesses
Court ServicesAllows authorized users to search court record databases, make payments for court fines, and in some cases digitally file court documents.Legal professionals, citizens
Driver’s License RenewalPermits citizens to renew and pay for their driver’s license online using a credit/debit card.online.Citizens
Health Professional License ServicesAllows users to search databases on several health professions to verify license status.Hospitals, clinics, health insurers, citizens
Hunting and Fishing LicensesPermits citizens to obtain and pay for outdoor recreation licenses over the internet via a computer or mobile device or from point-of-purchase retail kiosks.Citizens
Income and Property Tax PaymentsAllows users to file and pay for a variety of state and local income and property taxes.Businesses and citizens
Limited Criminal History SearchesFor those legally authorized, provides users with the ability to obtain a limited criminal history report on a specified individual.Schools, governments, human resource professionals, nonprofits working with children or handicapped adults
Motor Vehicle Driver History Record RetrievalFor those legally authorized businesses, this service offers controlled instant look-up of driving history records. Includes commercial licenses.Data resellers, insurance companies
Motor Vehicle InspectionsAllows licensed state inspection stations to file certified motor vehicle and emissions testing inspections online.Businesses
Payment ProcessingPermits use of the internet for secure industry-compliant credit/debit card andprocessing, electronic check payment processing, both online and cash, including at the point of sale for government agency transactions.sale.Businesses and citizens


8


Prescription Drug MonitoringTracks the prescribing and dispensing of controlled substances. Consolidates disparate information representing treatment options, education, enforcement and regulatory requirements, and prescriber patterns and volumes.Hospitals, clinics, doctors, law enforcement, governments
Professional License RenewalPermits professionals to renew and pay for their licenses online using a credit/debit card.online.Attorneys, doctors, nurses, architects, and other licensed professionals
Secretary of State Business SearchesAllows users to access filings of corporations, partnerships, and other entities, including charter documents.Attorneys, lenders
Temporary Vehicle TagsRecords temporary vehicle tag registration of a newly purchased car in real time with the state and issues a customized temporary plate for display on the vehicle.Automobile dealerships, citizens, law enforcement



9


Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Searches and FilingsPermits searches of the UCC database to verify financial liens and permits filings of secured financial documents.Attorneys, lenders
Vehicle Title, Lien & RegistrationProvides controlled interactive title, registration, and lien database access. Permits citizens to renew and pay for their vehicle registrations online.Insurance companies, lenders, citizens
Vital RecordsProvides authorized access to birth, death, marriage, domestic partnership and civil union certificates.Citizens


In addition to these and other services, we also provide customer service and support. Our customer service representatives serve as a liaison between our government partners and businesses and citizens.


Sales and Marketing


We have two primary sales and marketing goals:


to develop new sources of revenues through new government relationships; and
to retain and grow our revenue streams from existing government relationships.


We have well-established sales and marketing processes for achieving these goals, which are managed by our national sales divisionand marketing divisions and a dedicated marketing function within most of our subsidiaries.


Developing new sources of revenue


We focus our new government sales and marketing efforts on increasing the number of federal, state and local government agencies that desire to make government more accessible and efficient for all by delivering information and/or completing transactions in new and innovative ways. We meet regularly with information technology, business and policy officials at all levels of government to educate them on the services we offer to drive digital government innovation and transformation for their jurisdictions.


We have a dedicated and experienced sales team focused on our top sales priorities at the federal and state level, including enterprise, digital government opportunities using our proven transaction-based funding model, as well as alternative funding models, and agency-level digital government services under a variety of flexible funding models.


We are regular speakers at conferences all overacross the country devoted to using innovation to facilitate the relationship between governments and the citizens and businesses they serve. In addition to cultivating relationships with federal,


9


state, and local government officials, we also develop supportive and educational relationships with professional and business organizations that may benefit from digital government improvements and new digital services we can deploy. Finally, we focus our corporate marketing efforts on key government decision makers using advertising, white paper development, media relations and social media.


Once a government decides to implement digital services, it typically starts a selection process that operates under special procurement rules that apply to government purchasing. These rules typically require open bidding by possible service providers against a list of requirements established by the government under existing procedures or procedures specifically created for the service provider selection process. We respond to requests for bids with a proposal that details our philosophy, experience and specific plans for implementing our services and business models. Once our proposal is selected, we enter into negotiations for a contract.


Growing existing markets


In our existing federal, state and local government relationships, our marketing efforts focus on:





10


expanding the number of government agencies and localities that provide digital government services;
identifying new government services that can be usefully and cost-effectively delivered digitally; and
increasing the number of users who conduct business digitally with governments.


Although each government’s unique political and economic environment drives different marketing and development priorities, we have found many of our core applications to be relevant across multiple jurisdictions. Most of our subsidiaries have a dedicated director of marketing and additional marketing staff who coordinate with our national marketing division and meet regularly with government, business and consumer representatives to discuss potential new services and promote existing services. We also promote the use of our extensive library of unique digital government services and payment solutions to existing and new customers through speaking engagements and targeted advertising to organizations for professionals, including lawyers, bankers and insurance agents who have a need for regular digital interaction with government. We identify services that have been developed and implemented successfully for one government and replicate them in other jurisdictions.


Technology and Operations


For more than 25 years, we have made substantial investments in the development of internet-based and mobile applicationsservices and operations specifically designed to allow businesses and citizens to transact with and receive information from governments online. The scope of our technological expertise includes network engineering as it applies to the interconnection of government systems to the internet, internet security, web-to-legacy system integration, web-to-mainframe integration, web-to-mobile integration, cloud integration, database design, website administration, web page development and payment processing. Within this scope, we have developed and implemented a comprehensive framework for governments, and a broad array of stand-alone configurable platforms and products along with services using a combination of our own proprietary technologies and commercially available, licensed technologies. We believe that our technological expertise, coupled with our in-depth understanding of governmental processes and systems, has made us adept at rapidly creating tailored digital government services that keep our partners on the forefront of technology.


Each of our government partners has unique priorities and needs in the development of its digital government services.services and payment solutions. More than half of our employees work in the internet services, application development and technology operations areas, and most are focused on a single government partner’s technology needs. Our employees develop an understanding of a specific government’s applicationservices priorities, technical profiles and information technology personnel and management. At the same time, our development directors are trained by experienced technical staff from our other operations, and there is frequent communication and collaboration, which ensures that our government partners can make use of the most advanced digital government services we have developed throughout our organization.


The majority of our portalstate enterprise infrastructure and applications are hosted in a private cloud environment at a central data facility operated by a third-party, with backup at a similar facility in another location. Some of our portal state enterprise


10


infrastructure and applications are physically hosted in each jurisdiction in which we operate on servers that we own or lease, or in a third-party cloud environment. We also provide links to sites that are maintained by government agencies or organizations that we do not manage. Our objective is to provide uninterrupted onlinedigital service 24 hours per day and seven days a week, and our operations maintain extensive backup, security and disaster recovery procedures.


History has proven that our systems and applications are scalable and can easily be replicated from one government entity to another. We focus on sustaining low-overhead operations, with all major investments driven by the objective of deploying the highest value-added technology and applications to each operation.


Finally, we have designed our digital government solutionsservices and servicespayment solutions to be compatible with virtually any existing system and to be rapidly deployable. To enable speed and efficiency of deployment, we license commercially available technology whenever possible and focus on the integration and configuration of these “off-the-shelf” hardware and software components when necessary. While we expect that commercially licensed technology will continue to be available at reasonable costs, there can be no assurance that the licenses for such third-party technologies will not be terminated or that we will be able to license third-party technology and applications for future services. While we do not believe that any one individual technology or application we license is material to our business, changes in or the loss of third-party licenses could lead to a material increase in the costs of licensing or to our products becoming inoperable or their performance being materially



11


reduced, with the result that we may need to incur additional development or procurement costs to help ensure continued performance of our services.


We regard our intellectual property as important to our success. We rely on a combination of nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements with governments, our employees, subcontractors and other third parties, copyrights and privacy and trade secret laws to protect and limit the distribution of the proprietary software applications, documentation and processes we have developed in connection with the digital government services we offer.


Competition


Historically, we have not faced significant or consistent competition from companies vying to provide transaction-funded enterprise-wide digital services to governments; however, we face intense competition from companies providing point solutions and platforms to individual government agencies. We believe that the principal factors upon which our businesses compete are:


our unique understanding of government needs;
the quality and fit of our digital government services;services and payment solutions;
the comprehensiveness of our services in the areas of technology, marketing, security, privacy, policy and regulation;
speed and responsiveness to the needs of businesses and citizens;
a proven transaction-based business model that is cost-effective;cost-effective as well as flexible funding models to fit many different government needs; and
our enterprise-wide approach.approach to serve all agencies, as well as the ability to deliver stand-alone SaaS solutions in the area of payment processing, healthcare, outdoors, and licensing.


We believe we compete favorably with respect to the above-listed factors. In most cases, the principalAn alternative for our enterprise-wide services is a government-designed and managed service that integrates multiple vendors’ technologies, products and services. Companies that have expertise in marketing and providing technology services to government entities compete with us by further developing their services and increasing their focus on agency-specific segments of their business.


Additionally, in some geographic areas, we may face agency-level competition from firms with established reputations and political relationships with potential government partners. Examples of companies that may compete and/or currently compete with us at the enterprise and agency levellevels are the following:




11


traditional large systems integrators and consulting firms, including Deloitte, Accenture, IBM, CGI and Unisys;
traditional large software applications developers,platform providers, including AWS, Microsoft and Oracle;Salesforce;
digital transaction payment processors, including ACI Worldwide, Inc.First Payment Systems, Paymentus and Link2Gov Corp;FIS;
software application developers and business, professional and occupational license providers, including Accela, FAST Enterprises and GCR Inc.;GCR; and
other niche providers, such as Aspira, Sovereign Sportsman Solutions and Brandt Information Services in outdoors and Appriss.Appriss in healthcare.


Seasonality


The use of some of our digital government services and payment solutions is seasonal, particularly the accessing of motor vehicle driver history records, resulting in lower revenues from this service in the fourth quarter of each calendar year, due to the lower number of business days in this quarter and a lower volume of transactions during the holiday periods.


EmployeesHuman Capital Management and Employee Relations


As of December 31, 2018,2020, we had approximately 9201,025 full-time employees, of which approximately 320410 were working in corporate operations and approximately 600615 were in our outsourced portalstate enterprise and software & services businesses. Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified technical and management personnel. We also employ independent contractors to support our application development, marketing, sales



12


and administrative departments. Our employees are not covered by any collective bargaining agreement, and we have never experienced a work stoppage. We believe that our relations with our employees are good.


To facilitate talent attraction and retention, we strive to make NIC a diverse, inclusive and safe workplace, with opportunities for our employees to grow and develop in their careers, supported by competitive compensation, benefits and health and wellness programs, and by programs that build connections between our employees and their communities.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS


Our operations are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including those described below. If any of these risks occur, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In that case, the value of our common stock could decline substantially.


Risks Relating to Our Business

Because we have a limited number of government contracts, the termination or non-renewal of certain of these contracts may harm our business.


Our enterprise-wide contracts typically have multi-year terms with provisions for renewals for various periods at the option of the government. In addition, we have a limited number of other contracts with government agencies through which we provide digital government services.


A government typically has the option to terminate its contract prior to the expiration date if we breach a material contractual obligation and fail to cure such breach within a specified period or upon the occurrence of other events or circumstances specified in our contracts.


We currently have 1514 state enterprise contracts and three software & services contracts under which we provide enterprise-wide digital government services as well as our contract with the FMCSA, that can be terminated by the other party without cause upon a specified period of notice. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 45%48% of our total consolidated revenues


12


for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020. If any of these contracts are terminated without cause, the terms of the respective contract may require the government to pay us a fee to continue to use our applications in its portal.applications.


In addition, we currently have 1011 contracts under which we provide enterprise-wide digital government services, as well as our contract with the FMCSA, that have expiration dates within the 12-month period following December 31, 2018.2020. Although certain of these contracts have renewal provisions, any renewal is at the option of our government partners, who may choose to not renew the contract, to re-open bidding for the services, to take over the services in place and provide services internally, or to allow individual government agencies to retain the services of their own providers. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 31%28% of our total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020. If a contract expires after a defined term, the government partner would be entitled to take over the services in place, and NIC would have no future revenue from, or obligation to, such former government partner, except as otherwise provided in the contract.


The loss of a contract with one or more government partners, as a result of the expiration, termination, or failure to renew the contract, if not replaced, could significantly reduce our revenues and profitability. If these revenue shortfalls were to occur, our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition would be harmed. We cannot be certain if, when, or to what extent, governments might fail to renew or terminate any or all of their contracts with us.


The COVID-19 pandemic has had and will continue to have significant impacts on our business.

The COVID-19 pandemic and related public health measures continue to rapidly evolve, creating disruption and uncertainty. The extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and financial results will continue to depend on numerous evolving factors that we are not able to accurately predict, including the duration, scope and severity of the virus, the extent and effectiveness of containment actions, whether the virus recurs seasonally, and the impact of these and other factors on our employees, government partners, citizen consumers and vendors, as well as economic conditions during and after the pandemic, governmental actions that have been taken, or may be taken in the future, in response to the pandemic, and changes in citizen consumer behavior in response to the pandemic, some of which may continue in the future.

The markets for our COVID-19-related services, including rapid-testing solutions and pandemic unemployment services, are characterized by intense competition, evolving distribution models and disruptive technology developments, among other things, which create downward pressure on pricing and profit margins and could adversely affect our contract renewal rates, as well as our ability to attract new customers. Our revenues from COVID-19-related services will depend on the duration and scope of the pandemic, as well as our continued ability to enhance and integrate our existing services, introduce new services in a timely and cost-effective manner and meet changing government and citizen consumer expectations and needs, among other things. Some of our competitors and potential competitors for COVID-19-related services enjoy competitive advantages such as greater financial, sales, marketing and other resources, as well as broader brand awareness. As a result of these advantages, potential and current government partners and other clients might select the services of our competitors, causing a loss of our current market share.

In response to COVID-19 concerns, we have imposed strict travel restrictions, temporarily closed all our offices and shifted to remote operations to ensure social distancing and the health and safety of our employees which may have negative impacts on our business development efforts. Most of our government partners and potential government partners have implemented similar measures, which may limit our ability to provide or sell our services to them. Our government partners may also have less funding for services, delay or cancel purchasing decisions or projects in light of uncertainties arising from the COVID-19 outbreak, which may reduce our revenues.

If one of our key employees or executive officers were to contract an infectious disease that impacts the ability to work for an extended period, even with an adequate succession plan, it could harm our business until that employee or executive officer recovers or until a permanent replacement is found. Hiring and training new employees may require substantial resources and management attention, particularly in a remote workforce environment. Further, because we are self-insured for healthcare, the medical costs associated with treating our employees that contract an infectious disease such as COVID-19 could be significant.



13


COVID-19 has negatively affected economic conditions in the United States and resulted in the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates to near zero, which has reduced the interest income we earn on our investable cash and increased the amount of fees we pay for commercial banking services. Any reduction in the earnings credit rate set by our commercial banking partners, which a bank calculates on non-interest bearing customer deposits and uses to offset service charges, could further increase fees we pay for commercial banking services.

We have partnered with third parties to offer and conduct COVID-19 testing on behalf of governmental agencies or other entities, and those third parties may not perform satisfactorily, including failing to meet deadlines for the completion of such testing, which may prevent or delay our ability to seek or obtain additional COVID-19 testing services or otherwise harm our business. If we are not able to maintain these third-party relationships or if these arrangements are terminated, we may have to alter our COVID-19 testing development and commercialization plans.

We have partnered with and rely on third-party healthcare providers to offer and conduct COVID-19 testing on behalf of governmental agencies or other entities. We do not plan to independently conduct COVID-19 testing. These third parties play a significant role in COVID-19 testing at the service sites. These third-party arrangements might terminate for a variety of reasons, including a failure to perform by the third parties. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements, our COVID-19 testing solution services may be delayed or terminated and hinder our ability to expand such services.

Our reliance on these third parties for conducting the health care aspects of COVID-19 testing reduces our control over these activities but does not relieve us of our responsibilities. For example, we remain responsible for ensuring that our COVID-19 testing is conducted in accordance with the regulatory requirements and the terms of our agreements. Failure to do so can result in fines, adverse publicity and civil and criminal sanctions.

If any of our relationships with these third parties terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative third parties or do so on commercially reasonable terms. Switching or adding additional third-party providers may involve additional cost and require management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new provider commences work. As a result, delays can occur, which could materially impact our ability to continue providing and expanding our COVID-19 testing solution. The COVID-19 pandemic and government measures taken in response have also had a significant impact on many testing service providers. Although we plan to carefully manage our relationships with our third-party providers, we may nonetheless encounter challenges or delays in the future, which could have a material and adverse impact on our COVID-19 testing business and prospects.

If we are unable to meet the unique challenges involved in contracting with governments and government agencies, our business may be harmed.

Our revenues are generated principally from contracts with state governments and government agencies within a state, and to a lesser extent with federal government agencies, to provide digital government services on behalf of those government entities to complete transactions, process payments and distribute public information digitally. We face many risks uniquely associated with government contracting, including:

regulations that govern the fees we collect for many of our services, limiting our control over the level of transaction-based fees we are permitted to retain;
the potential need for governments to draft and adopt specific legislation before they can circulate a request for proposal (“RFP”) to which we can respond or before they can otherwise award a contract or provide a new digital service, and the risk that enabling legislation previously adopted to establish our contract or to otherwise benefit us could be challenged, reinterpreted, repealed or modified;
unexpected changes in legislation that increase our costs or result in a temporary or permanent suspension of our services;
the potential need for changes to legislation authorizing government’s contracting with third parties to receive or distribute public information;


14


long and complex sales cycles that vary significantly according to each government entity’s policies and procedures;
political resistance to the concept of government agencies contracting with third parties to receive or distribute public information, which has been offered traditionally only by the government agencies and often without charge;
changes in government administrations that could impact existing RFPs, rebids, renewals or extensions; and
government budget deficits and appropriation approval processes and periods, either of which could cause governments to curtail spending on services, including time and materials-based fees for application development or fixed-fee services, which constituted approximately 7% and 11% of total consolidated revenues, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Each of these risks is outside of our control and could result in harm to our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

Because many of our contracts grant our government partners fully paid, perpetual licenses to use and modify certain applications and digital government services we develop, upon a termination by them for cause or the natural expiration of our state enterprise contracts, many of our government partners could elect to take over the operation and maintenance of our applications themselves or hire a competitor to operate and maintain such applications. Any such decision to do so could adversely affect our revenues and profits.

After termination for cause or the natural expiration of our contracts, it is possible that governments and their contractors may operate services themselves using the perpetual use license we typically are contractually obligated to provide to them. This license generally permits the government to use and modify the applications and digital government services we have developed for them on a perpetual, royalty-free basis (excluding certain proprietary applications that we provide on a SaaS basis). This perpetual use license could make it easier and more cost effective for our government partners to elect not to enter into a new contract with us after the expiration of one of our contracts. Any such election could adversely affect our revenues and profits. Additionally, anyone using our applications and digital government services may inadvertently allow our intellectual property or other information to fall into the hands of third parties, including our competitors. If a contract is terminated prior to the natural expiration of the term without cause, the terms of the respective contract typically require the government to pay a fee to us to continue to use our applications in its state.

Our ability to grow revenues may be limited by the number of governments and government agencies that choose to provide digital government services using our business model and by the finite number of governments with which we may contract for our digital government services.

Our revenues are generated principally from contracts with state governments and government agencies within a state to provide digital government services on behalf of those government entities, and to complete transactions, process payments and distribute public information digitally. The growth in our revenues largely depends on government entities adopting our business model. We cannot ensure that government entities will choose to provide digital government services or continue to provide digital government services at current levels, or that they will provide such services with private assistance or by adopting our model. Generally, under our enterprise-wide transaction-based business model, we initially generate a high proportion of our revenues from the transaction-based services we provide on behalf of a limited number of government agencies within a state, while other agencies consider participating in the enterprise-wide contract. If any of our partner agencies within a state are dissatisfied with even one of the many services we provide, it may negatively affect our ability to convince additional agencies to partner with us or retain our enterprise agreement. The failure to secure contracts with certain government agencies, particularly those agencies that control motor vehicle driver history records, could result in revenue levels insufficient to support our operations on a self-sustained, profitable basis.

In addition, because there is a finite number of states remaining with which we can contract for our services, future increases in our revenues may depend, in part, on our ability to expand our business model to include multi-state cooperative organizations, local governments and federal agencies and to broaden our service offerings to diversify our


15


revenue streams across our lines of business. We cannot ensure that we will succeed in expanding into new markets or broadening our service offerings, or that our services will be adaptable to those new markets.

We earn a significant percentage of our revenues and related accounts receivable from a limited number of services and customers. Any reduction in demand for those services or negative trends in the businesses of those customers could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We earn a high proportion of our revenues and related accounts receivable from a limited number of services and customers. A significant portion of our revenues is derived from data resellers’ use of our services to access motor vehicle driver history records for the automobile insurance industry. Transaction-based fees charged for access to motor vehicle driver history records in various states accounted for approximately 19% of our total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. One of these data resellers, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, accounted for approximately 11% of our total consolidated revenues during this period. While fees charged for access to motor vehicle driver history records are currently expected to continue to account for a significant portion of our consolidated revenues for the foreseeable future, regulatory changes or the development or increased use of alternative information sources, such as credit scoring, could materially reduce our revenues from this service. Our contracts with data resellers generally may be terminated at any time after a 30-day notice and may be terminated immediately at the option of any party in certain circumstances. Furthermore, our credit risk may increase in the event any data resellers experience liquidity or solvency issues. We generally do not require collateral to secure accounts receivable.

A reduction in revenues from currently popular services or an inability to collect a major portion of our accounts receivable would harm our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition, and our liquidity may be adversely affected.

If our competitors become more successful in developing and selling products or platforms for government-related services, including certain vertical and point solutions we offer, then our business could be adversely affected.

Companies that have expertise in marketing and providing online services to government entities compete with us by further developing their services and increasing their focus on this area of their businesses. To the extent we can continue to expand our services in existing states and our contracts become more profitable, the competition in our markets may increase. Many of our potential competitors are national or international in scope and have greater resources than we do. These resources could enable our potential competitors to offer lower prices or take other measures to gain market share. Additionally, in some geographic areas, we may face competition from firms with established reputations and political relationships with potential government partners. If we do not compete effectively or if we experience any pricing pressures, reduced profit margins or loss of market share, our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition may be adversely affected.

Our business will be adversely affected if we are unable to hire, integrate, train, or retain the qualified personnel needed to operate our business.

Our future success will depend, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees, most of whom have extensive experience with us and in our industry. The loss of any of our executives or key employees, even with an adequate succession plan, could harm our business. In addition, we may need to hire personnel for new operations in jurisdictions in which we may obtain contracts. We may not be able to retain our current key employees or attract, integrate, or retain other qualified employees in the future. If we do not succeed in attracting new personnel, particularly in the competitive market for information technology professionals, or succeed in integrating, retaining, and motivating our current personnel, our business could be harmed. In addition, new employees generally require substantial training in the presentation, policies, and positioning of our services. This training will require substantial resources and management attention.



16


Increases in credit/debit card association and automated clearing house fees may result in lower transaction volumes and/or a reduction in our earnings.

From time to time, credit/debit card and electronic check processors increase the fees (interchange and assessment fees) that they charge companies such as us. We could attempt to pass these increases along to citizens and businesses, but this might result in the loss of those customers or lower transaction volumes. If we are not able to pass along such increased fees to citizens and businesses in the future, we may have to absorb all or a portion of such increases thereby increasing our operating costs and reducing our earnings and profit margins.

We depend on third parties, including subcontractors and prime contractors with whom we engage or collaborate for certain projects, deliverables, and/or financial transaction processes. If these parties fail to satisfy their obligations to us or we are unable to maintain these relationships, our operating results and business prospects could be adversely affected.

To satisfy our obligations under contracts, we often engage third parties, including subcontractors, to fulfill certain requirements. We also use third parties to ensure that our services and solutions integrate with the software, systems, or infrastructure requirements of other vendors and service providers. Our ability to serve our clients and deliver our solutions in a timely manner depends on our ability to retain and maintain relationships with subcontractors, vendors, and service providers and the ability of these third parties to meet their obligations in a timely manner, as well as on our effective oversight of their performance. If any third-party fails to perform on a timely basis the agreed-upon services, our ability to fulfill our obligations may be jeopardized. Third-party performance deficiencies could result in the termination of our contract for default. A termination for default could expose us to liability for damages and have an adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition and our ability to compete for future contracts and orders.

In addition, we may act as subcontractor to a third-party prime contractor to secure new projects. Subcontracting arrangements where we are not the prime contractor pose unique risks to us because we may not have control over the customer relationship, and our ability to generate revenue under such subcontracts may depend on the prime contractor, its performance and relationship with the customer, and its relationship with us. We could suffer losses in the event a prime contract under which we serve as a subcontractor is terminated, whether for non-performance by the prime contractor or otherwise. Upon a termination of the prime contract, our subcontract would similarly terminate, and the resulting contract loss could have an adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition and our ability to compete for future contracts and orders.

We may be unable to integrate new technologies and industry standards effectively, which may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our future success will depend on our ability to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality, and features of our services in accordance with industry standards and to address the increasingly sophisticated technological needs of our customers on a cost-effective and timely basis. Our ability to remain competitive will depend, in part, on our ability to:

enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality and other features of the government services we offer;
continue to develop our technical expertise;
develop and introduce new services, applications and technology to meet changing customer needs and preferences; and
influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes in a timely and cost-effective manner.

We cannot ensure that we will be successful in responding to the above technological and industry challenges in a timely and cost-effective manner. If we are unable to integrate new technologies and industry standards effectively, our business could be harmed.



17


Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect them could harm our company.

We regard our intellectual property as important to our success. We rely on a combination of nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements and policies with governments, our employees, prime contractors, subcontractors, vendors and other third parties, copyrights and privacy and trade secret laws to protect and limit the distribution of the proprietary applications, documentation and processes we have developed in connection with the services we offer. Despite our precautions, third parties may succeed in misappropriating our intellectual property or independently developing similar intellectual property. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights and proprietary information, if we utilize open source software in a manner that places proprietary source code in the public domain, or if we become involved in litigation relating to our intellectual property rights and proprietary technology, our business could be harmed. Any actions we take may not be adequate to protect our proprietary rights, and other companies may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our proprietary technology.

Any failure to meet our responsibilities or obligations under a contract, regardless of whether there is a claim for which we are liable, may result in damages.

Performance deficiencies by us or our third-party vendors, including subcontractors, could result in a default under one or more of our contracts, which could expose us to liability and have an adverse effect on our business prospects, on our financial condition, and on our ability to compete for future contracts. If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, if our performance or our third-party vendors’ performance gives rise to claims, if our government partners are otherwise held liable for claims related to the services provided under our contracts, or if our government partners seek to hold us liable for claims or damages for which we have agreed to be responsible for under our contracts, we could be subject to legal liability, monetary damages and loss of customer relationships. Additionally, in many of our contracts, our government partners do not indemnify us from losses related to their performance or non-performance.

Our business will suffer if we lose the right to provide access to the content filed or distributed through our digital government services or if we are held liable for the content that we pass to users from government entities.

We do not own or create the content filed or distributed through the digital government services we operate. We depend on the governments with which we contract to supply information and data feeds to us on a timely basis to allow businesses and citizens to complete transactions and obtain government information. We cannot ensure that these data sources will continue to be available in the future. Government entities could terminate their contracts to provide data. Changes in regulations could mean that governments no longer collect some types of data or that the data is protected by more stringent privacy rules preventing uses now made of it. Moreover, our data sources are not always subject to exclusive agreements, so that data included in our services also may be included in those of our potential competitors. In addition, we depend upon the accuracy and reliability of government computer systems and data collection for the content distributed through the services we operate. The loss, unavailability, or inaccuracy of our data sources in the future, or the loss of our exclusive right to distribute some of the data sources, could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

Because we aggregate and digitally distribute private and sensitive public information, we may face potential liability for defamation, libel, negligence, invasion of privacy and other claims based on the nature and content of the material that is published on or distributed through the digital government services we operate. Most of the agreements through which we obtain consent to disseminate this information do not contain indemnity provisions in our favor. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against online services in the past. We cannot ensure that our insurance will be adequate to reimburse us for all liability that may be imposed. Any liability that is not covered by our insurance, or is in excess of our insurance coverage, could severely harm our business operations and financial condition.

We may need more working capital to fund operations and expand our business, and any failure to obtain such needed working capital would adversely affect our business.

Although we believe that our current financial resources and future cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our present working capital and capital expenditure requirements and potential dividend payments for at least the next 12 months, we may need to raise additional capital before this period ends to further:



18


fund operations, if unforeseen costs or revenue shortfalls arise;
support our expansion into other states and federal government agencies beyond what is contemplated if unforeseen opportunities arise;
expand our product and service offerings beyond what is contemplated if unforeseen opportunities arise;
fund acquisitions;
respond to unforeseen competitive pressures; and
acquire technologies beyond what is contemplated.

Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the success of our existing and new service offerings and potentially competing technological and market developments. However, any projections of future cash flows are subject to substantial uncertainty. If current cash, lines of credit and cash generated from operations are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity securities, issue debt securities, or draw on the unused portion of our line of credit. If we need to obtain new debt or equity financing in the future, the terms and availability of such financing may be impacted by economic and financial market conditions, as well as our financial condition and results of operations at the time we seek additional financing. The sale of additional equity securities could result in dilution to our stockholders. From time to time, we expect to evaluate the acquisition of or investment in businesses and technologies that complement our various digital government businesses. Acquisitions or investments might affect our liquidity requirements or cause us to sell additional equity securities or issue debt securities. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If adequate funds were not available on acceptable terms, our ability to develop or enhance our applications and services, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited. This limitation could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Our quarterly results of operations may be volatile and difficult to predict. If our quarterly results of operations, future growth, profitability or dividend levels fail to meet the expectations of public market analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock may decrease significantly.

Our future revenues and results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to several factors, many of which are outside of our control, and any of which may harm our business. These factors include:

the commencement, completion or termination of contracts during any quarter;
the introduction of new services by us or our competitors;
technical difficulties or system downtime affecting the operation of our services;
the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the expansion of our business operations and infrastructure;
unexpected changes in federal, state and local legislation that increase our costs and/or result in a temporary or permanent decrease in our revenues;
the seasonal use of some of our services, particularly the accessing of motor vehicle driver history records;
changes in economic conditions;
the result of negative cash flows due to capital investments; and
significant charges related to acquisitions.

Due to the factors noted above and the other factors described in these Risk Factors, our financial performance in a quarter may be lower than we anticipate, and if we are unable to reduce spending in that quarter, our results of operations for that quarter may be harmed. One should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an


19


indication of future performance. It is possible that in some future periods our results of operations may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this occurs, the price of our common stock may decline. In addition, if we fail to meet expectations related to future growth, profitability, dividends or other market expectations, the price of our common stock may decline.

Our payment of dividends in the future is subject to several risks and uncertainties, and any failure to pay dividends in the future or any reduction in the amount of future dividend payments may adversely affect our stockholders.

Although our Board of Directors has approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make, subject to subsequent declaration, regular quarterly cash dividends, the payment of future dividends is subject to several risks and uncertainties, and we may not pay quarterly dividends in the same amounts or at all in the future. Our Board of Directors evaluates our dividend practice quarterly and may elect to increase, decrease or not pay a dividend at any time. Our ability to pay dividends could be affected by future business performance, liquidity, capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and debt covenants associated with our line of credit. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. Any future decisions to reduce or discontinue paying cash dividends to our stockholders could cause the trading price for our common stock to decline and could adversely affect our stockholders.

We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims, which are costly to defend and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.

We may become subject to claims alleging infringement of third-party intellectual property rights. Our state enterprise contracts require us to indemnify our government partners for infringing software we build or use. Any claims could subject us to costly litigation and may require us to pay damages and develop non-infringing intellectual property or acquire licenses to the intellectual property that is the subject of the alleged infringement. Licenses for such intellectual property may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. Litigation regarding intellectual property rights is common in the internet and software industries. We expect third-party infringement claims involving internet technologies and software products and services to continue to increase. If an infringement claim is filed against us, we may be prevented from using certain technologies and may incur significant costs resolving the claim. We cannot ensure that our applications and services do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties. In addition, we have agreed, and expect that we may agree in the future, to indemnify certain of our partners against claims that our services infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. We could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves and our partners against infringement claims.

We depend on technology licensed to us by third parties, and the loss of access to, or improper management of the licensing of this technology could delay implementation of our services or force us to pay higher license fees or fines.

We license numerous third-party technologies and applications that we incorporate into our existing service offerings, and on which, in the aggregate, we are substantially dependent. There can be no assurance that the licenses for such third-party technologies will not be terminated or that we will be able to license third-party technology and applications for future services. While we do not believe that one individual technology or application we license is material to our business, changes in or the loss of third-party licenses could lead to a material increase in the costs of licensing, or to our products becoming inoperable or their performance being materially reduced. The result could be that we may need to incur additional development or procurement costs to continue the performance of our services, and either the cost of such undertakings or the failure to successfully complete such undertakings could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Additionally, because of the decentralized nature of our operations, licensing of third-party technology can be complex and difficult to track and continually monitor. Our inability to do so could result in fines, an increase in licensing fees, or the temporary inability to utilize the third-party technology until licensing issues are resolved.

We are subject to independent audits as requested by our government customers. Deficiencies in our performance under a government contract could result in contract termination, reputational damage, or financial penalties.



20


Each government entity with which we contract may have the authority to require an independent audit of our performance and financial management of contracted operations in each respective state. The scope of audits could include inspections of income statements, balance sheets, fee structures, collections practices, service levels, security practices, and our compliance with contract provisions and applicable laws, regulations and standards. The expansion of our operations into new markets and services may further expose us to requirements and potential liabilities under additional statutes and rules that have previously not been relevant to our business. We cannot ensure that a future audit will not find any material performance deficiencies that would result in an adjustment to our revenues and result in financial penalties. Moreover, any consequent negative publicity could harm our reputation among other governments with which we would like to contract. These factors could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.

Risks Relating to Technology and Cybersecurity

Security breaches or unauthorized access to payment information (including credit/debit card data) personal information (including personal health information) or any other sensitive data subject to state and federal laws that we or our service providers store, process, use or transmit for our business may harm our reputation, cause service disruptions and adversely affect our business and results of operations.


A significant challenge to electronic commerce is the secure transmission of payment information and/or personal information over information technology networks and systems which process, transmit and store electronic information, and manage or support a variety of business processes. The collection, maintenance, use, disclosure and disposal of payment information and personal information by our businesses are regulated at state and federal levels, and cybersecurity legislation, executive orders and reporting requirements continue to evolve and become more complex. Because we either directly or indirectly through service providers (i) provide the electronic transmission of sensitive and personal information released from and filed with various government entities and (ii) perform online payment and electronic check processing services, we face the risk of a security breach. These security breaches could take place through system attacks, hacking events, acts of vandalism or theft, malware, viruses, human errors, catastrophes or other unforeseen events that could lead to significant



13


disruptions or compromises of information technology networks and systems or the unauthorized release or use of payment information or personal information. Additionally, vulnerabilities in the security of our own internal systems or those of our service providers could compromise the confidentiality of, or result in unauthorized access to, personal information of our employees.


We rely on encryption and authentication technology purchased or licensed from third parties to provide the security and authentication tools to effectively secure transmission of confidential information, including user credit/debit card information and banking data. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography, threats that evolve ahead of tools designed to counter them, or other developments may result in the breach or compromise of technology used by us to protect transaction data. Data breaches can also occur as a result of non-technical issues, such as so-called “social engineering.”


Despite the various security measures we have in place to protect payment and personal information from unauthorized disclosure and to comply with applicable laws and regulations, our information technology networks and systems and those of our third-party vendors and service providers cannot be made completely secure against security incidents. Even the most well protected information, networks, systems and facilities remain vulnerable to security breaches or disruptions, because (i) the techniques used in such attempts are constantly evolving and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, and in some cases are designed not to be detected and, in fact, may not be detected for an extended period and (ii) the security methodologies, protocols, systems and procedures used for protection are implemented by humans at each level, and human errors may occur. Accordingly, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate security barriers or other preventative measures, or if such measures are implemented, and even if appropriate training is conducted in support of such measures, human errors may still occur. It is impossible for us to entirely mitigate this risk. A party, whether internal or external, who is able to circumvent our security measures, or those of our service providers, could misappropriate information, including, but not limited to payment information and personal information, or cause interruptions or direct damage to our partners or their users.


In addition, COVID-19 remote work-from-home restrictions make us more dependent on certain technologies that allow us to operate our business remotely and collaborate without face-to-face meetings both internally and with our


21


customers. To the extent we may experience significant technological disruptions in our work-from-home capabilities, we would anticipate a negative impact on our business operations. Further, to the extent supply chains are disrupted, it may become more difficult to provide necessary technology to our employees working from remote locations.

In addition, the increase in certain of our employees working remotely has amplified certain risks to our business, including increased demand on our information technology resources and systems, increased phishing, business email compromise and other cybersecurity attacks, including increased introduction of malware, as cybercriminals try to exploit the uncertainty surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, and an increase in the number of points of potential attack, such as laptops and mobile devices (both of which are now being used in increased numbers) to be secured, and any failure to effectively manage these risks, including to timely identify and appropriately respond to any cyberattacks or other disruption to our technology infrastructure, may adversely affect our business.

Under payment card rules and our contracts with our credit card processors, if there is a breach of payment card information that we store, process, or transmit, we could be subject to fines. We could also be liable to partners for costs of investigation, notification, remediation and credit monitoring and for any damages to users under applicable laws or our partner contracts.


In addition, any noncompliance with privacy laws or a security breach involving the misappropriation, loss or other unauthorized access, use or disclosure of payment information or personal information, or other significant disruption involving our information technology networks and systems, or those of our service providers (whether or not caused by a breach of our contractual obligations or our negligence), may lead to substantial costs and other consequences, which may include negative publicity, impair our ability to conduct our business, subject us to private litigation and government investigations and enforcement actions and cause us to incur potentially significant liability, damages or remediation costs, increased cybersecurity protection costs, lost revenues, increased insurance premiums and damage to our stock price and long-term stockholder value. It may also cause the governments with whom we contract to lose confidence in us, any of which may cause the termination or modification of our government contracts and impair our ability to win future contracts. Actual or anticipated attacks and risks affecting our own, our service providers’ or our government partners’ environment may cause us to incur increasing costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies, to train employees, and to engage third-party security experts and consultants. Although we maintain insurance coverage that, subject to policy terms and conditions and subject to a retention, is designed to address certain aspects of security and privacy liability, such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover or protect against the costs, liabilities, and other adverse effects arising from a security breach or system disruption. If we fail to reasonably maintain the security of confidential information, we may also suffer significant reputational and financial losses and our results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and liquidity may be adversely affected.

If we are unable to meet the unique challenges involved in contracting with governments and government agencies, our business may be harmed.

Our revenues are generated principally from contracts with state governments and government agencies within a state, and to a lesser extent with federal government agencies, to provide digital government services on behalf of those government entities to complete transactions and distribute public information digitally. We face many risks uniquely associated with government contracting, including:



14



regulations that govern the fees we collect for many of our services, limiting our control over the level of transaction-based fees we are permitted to retain;
the potential need for governments to draft and adopt specific legislation before they can circulate a request for proposal (“RFP”) to which we can respond or before they can otherwise award a contract or provide a new digital service, and the risk that enabling legislation previously adopted to establish our contract or to otherwise benefit us could be challenged, reinterpreted, repealed or modified;
unexpected changes in legislation that increase our costs or result in a temporary or permanent suspension of our services;
the potential need for changes to legislation authorizing government’s contracting with third parties to receive or distribute public information;
long and complex sales cycles that vary significantly according to each government entity’s policies and procedures;
political resistance to the concept of government agencies contracting with third parties to receive or distribute public information, which has been offered traditionally only by the government agencies and often without charge;
changes in government administrations that could impact existing RFPs, rebids, renewals or extensions; and
government budget deficits and appropriation approval processes and periods, either of which could cause governments to curtail spending on services, including time and materials-based fees for application development or fixed fees for portal management, which constituted approximately 4% and 1% of total consolidated revenues, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Each of these risks is outside of our control and could result in harm to our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

Because many of our contracts grant our government partners fully paid, perpetual licenses to use and modify certain applications and digital government services we develop, upon a termination by them for cause or the natural expiration of our portal contracts, many of our government partners could elect to take over the operation and maintenance of our applications themselves or hire a competitor to operate and maintain such applications. Any such decision to do so could adversely affect our revenues and profits.

After termination for cause or the natural expiration of our contracts, it is possible that governments and their contractors may operate services themselves using the perpetual use license we typically are contractually obligated to provide to them. This license generally permits the government to use and modify the applications and digital government services we have developed for them on a perpetual, royalty-free basis (excluding certain proprietary applications that we provide on a SaaS basis). This perpetual use license could make it easier and more cost effective for our government partners to elect not to enter into a new contract with us after the expiration of one of our contracts. Any such election could adversely affect our revenues and profits. Additionally, anyone using our applications and digital government services may inadvertently allow our intellectual property or other information to fall into the hands of third parties, including our competitors. If a contract is terminated prior to the natural expiration of the term without cause, the terms of the respective contract typically require the government to pay a fee to us to continue to use our applications in its state.

Our ability to grow revenues may be limited by the number of governments and government agencies that choose to provide digital government solutions using our business model and by the finite number of governments with which we may contract for our digital government solutions.

Our revenues are generated principally from contracts with state governments and government agencies within a state to provide digital government solutions on behalf of those government entities, and to complete transactions and distribute public information digitally. The growth in our revenues largely depends on government entities adopting our business model. We cannot ensure that government entities will choose to provide digital government services or continue to provide digital government services at current levels, or that they will provide such services with private assistance or by adopting our model. Generally, under our enterprise-wide transaction-based business model, we initially generate a high proportion



15


of our revenues from the transaction-based services we provide on behalf of a limited number of government agencies within a state, while other agencies consider participating in the portal. If any of our partner agencies within a state are dissatisfied with even one of the many services we provide, it may negatively affect our ability to convince additional agencies to partner with us or retain our enterprise agreement. The failure to secure contracts with certain government agencies, particularly those agencies that control motor vehicle driver history records, could result in revenue levels insufficient to support our operations on a self-sustained, profitable basis.

In addition, because there is a finite number of states remaining with which we can contract for our services, future increases in our revenues may depend, in part, on our ability to expand our business model to include multi-state cooperative organizations, local governments, and federal agencies and to broaden our service offerings to diversify our revenue streams across our lines of business. We cannot ensure that we will succeed in expanding into new markets or broadening our service offerings, or that our services will be adaptable to those new markets.

We earn a significant percentage of our revenues and related accounts receivable from a limited number of services and customers. Any reduction in demand for those services or negative trends in the businesses of those customers could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

We earn a high proportion of our revenues and related accounts receivable from a limited number of services and customers. A significant portion of our revenues is derived from data resellers’ use of our services to access motor vehicle driver history records for the automobile insurance industry. Transaction-based fees charged for access to motor vehicle driver history records in various states accounted for approximately 29% of our total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018. One of these data resellers, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, accounted for approximately 19% of our total consolidated revenues during this period, or approximately three-quarters of our revenues from motor vehicle driver history records. In addition, approximately 15% of our consolidated accounts receivable were from LexisNexis Risk Solutions at December 31, 2018. While fees charged for access to motor vehicle driver history records are currently expected to continue to account for a significant portion of our consolidated revenues for the foreseeable future, regulatory changes or the development or increased use of alternative information sources, such as credit scoring, could materially reduce our revenues from this service. Our contracts with data resellers generally may be terminated at any time after a 30-day notice and may be terminated immediately at the option of any party in certain circumstances. Furthermore, our credit risk may increase in the event any data resellers experience liquidity or solvency issues. We generally do not require collateral to secure accounts receivable.

A reduction in revenues from currently popular services or an inability to collect a major portion of our accounts receivable would harm our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition, and our liquidity may be adversely affected.


We could suffer significant losses and liability if our or our service providers’ operations, systems or platforms are disrupted or fail to perform properly or effectively.


The continued efficiency and proper functionality of our or our service providers’ technical systems, platforms and operational infrastructure is integral to our performance. As we grow, we continue to purchase equipment and upgrade our technology and network infrastructure to handle increased traffic on the digital government services we operate. We may experience occasional system interruptions and delays that make digital government services unavailable or slow to respond and prevent businesses and citizens from accessing information to which we provide access and services we operate. Any such interruptions or delays in the future could cause users to stop using the services we operate and could cause our government partners to penalize us financially or terminate agreements with us. Our operations, systems and platforms, or those of our service providers, may also be disrupted or fail due to catastrophic events such as natural disasters, telecommunications failures, power outages, cyber-attacks, terrorist attacks, acts of war or other catastrophic events. If any of these circumstances occurred, our business could be harmed.


The majority of our technology infrastructure and applications are hosted at leased data centers operated by a third-party on servers we own, with a near real-time backup at a similar facility in a different geographic region of the country. Some of our technology infrastructure and applications are physically hosted in each jurisdiction in which we operate on servers that we own or lease, or in a third-party provided cloud environment. Data center servers are virtually segmented by government partner while housing more than one government partner’s services. An outage in one of the servers hosted outside one of the data centers could affect that government partner’s services. An outage at both of our leased data centers,



16


or at one data center and to the connection to our backup facility, could affect more than one government partner’s services. Any of these system failures could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial


22


condition. Our insurance policies may not adequately compensate us for any losses that may occur due to any failures of or interruptions in our systems.


Our business will be adversely affected if we are unableRisks Relating to hire, integrate, train, or retain the qualified personnel needed to operate our business.Legal and Regulatory Matters

Our future success will depend, in part, on the efforts of our executive officers and other key employees, most of whom have extensive experience with us and in our industry. The loss of any of our executives or key employees, even with an adequate succession plan, could harm our business. In addition, we may need to hire personnel for new operations in jurisdictions in which we may obtain contracts. We may not be able to retain our current key employees or attract, integrate, or retain other qualified employees in the future. If we do not succeed in attracting new personnel, particularly in the competitive market for information technology professionals, or succeed in integrating, retaining, and motivating our current personnel, our business could be harmed. In addition, new employees generally require substantial training in the presentation, policies, and positioning of our services. This training will require substantial resources and management attention.

Increases in credit/debit card association and automated clearing house fees may result in lower transaction volumes and/or a reduction in our earnings.

From time to time, credit/debit card and electronic check processors increase the fees (interchange and assessment fees) that they charge companies such as us. We could attempt to pass these increases along to citizens and businesses, but this might result in the loss of those customers or lower transaction volumes. If we elect not to pass along such increased fees to citizens and businesses in the future, we may have to absorb all or a portion of such increases thereby increasing our operating costs and reducing our earnings and profit margins.

We depend on third parties, including subcontractors and prime contractors with whom we engage or collaborate for certain projects, deliverables, and/or financial transaction processes. If these parties fail to satisfy their obligations to us or we are unable to maintain these relationships, our operating results and business prospects could be adversely affected.

To satisfy our obligations under contracts, we often engage third parties, including subcontractors, to fulfill certain requirements. We also use third parties to ensure that our services and solutions integrate with the software, systems, or infrastructure requirements of other vendors and service providers. Our ability to serve our clients and deliver our solutions in a timely manner depends on our ability to retain and maintain relationships with subcontractors, vendors, and service providers and the ability of these third parties to meet their obligations in a timely manner, as well as on our effective oversight of their performance. If any third-party fails to perform on a timely basis the agreed-upon services, our ability to fulfill our obligations may be jeopardized. Third-party performance deficiencies could result in the termination of our contract for default. A termination for default could expose us to liability for damages and have an adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition and our ability to compete for future contracts and orders.

In addition, we may act as subcontractor to a third-party prime contractor to secure new projects. Subcontracting arrangements where we are not the prime contractor pose unique risks to us because we may not have control over the customer relationship, and our ability to generate revenue under such subcontracts may depend on the prime contractor, its performance and relationship with the customer, and its relationship with us. We could suffer losses in the event a prime contract under which we serve as a subcontractor is terminated, whether for non-performance by the prime contractor or otherwise. Upon a termination of the prime contract, our subcontract would similarly terminate, and the resulting contract loss could have an adverse effect on our business prospects, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition and our ability to compete for future contracts and orders.




17


Potential future acquisitions involve inherent risks that may materially adversely affect our business and results of operations.

To expand our operations and grow our market and client base, we may seek and complete strategic acquisitions and other business combinations in the future. Acquisitions have inherent risks which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In particular,

The pursuit of acquisitions and execution of integration plans may divert the attention of our management from other key responsibilities;
We may fail to successfully integrate the business and financial operations, business culture, services, intellectual property, solutions or personnel of an acquired business;
We may assume unanticipated liabilities and contingencies;
We may substantially reduce our cash position, become significantly leveraged because of incurring debt or issue additional equity to finance one or more acquisitions; and
Our earnings per share may be diluted because of acquisitions.

If we fail to identify suitable potential acquisition candidates, fail to successfully integrate acquired businesses or to fail to implement our business strategies with respect to these acquisitions, we may not be able to achieve projected results or support the amount of consideration paid for such acquired businesses, and our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.


We may become subject to liability under rules and standards for processing electronic direct debit payments from bank accounts and credit card payments.


We are required to comply with the Payment Card Industry’s Data Security Standards (“PCI DSS”) and the rules and standards promulgated by the National Automated Clearing House Association (“NACHA”) because we provide online payment and electronic check processing services. We may become potentially liable if we fail to handle transactions in accordance with these rules, or for failing to return funds within the prescribed time frame to the bank account of the person or entity disputing our authorization to debit those funds, before the dispute regarding our authorization is resolved. Our agreements with governmental agencies at the federal, state and local levels transfer this obligation for rapid funds return during dispute resolution to the government agencies affected, but in the event that such return does not happen, we may be potentially liable notwithstanding the government’s failure, and we may not be able to obtain reimbursement from the government involved or from the individual user or entity that initiated the debit without authorization. If this were to happen, our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition may be adversely affected. Our credit card and electronic check processing is also subject to the applicable rules of the card association or clearinghouse and applicable law. Additionally, in certain jurisdictions we are or may become subject to laws governing money transmitters and anti-money laundering for certain services we offer. If our interpretations, or those of our government partners, of any laws, rules, regulations, or standards are determined to be incorrect, we could be exposed to significant financial liability, substantial fines and penalties, cease and desist orders, and other sanctions that could restrict or eliminate our ability to provide certain of our services in one or more states or accept certain types of transactions in one or more states, or could force us to make costly changes to our business practices. If we were unable to accept payment cards or process checks electronically, our business would be negatively impacted. Even if we are not forced to change our business practices, the costs of compliance and obtaining necessary licenses and regulatory approvals could be substantial.


We may become liable for violations of the Driver Privacy Protection Actcertain privacy laws as adopted federally or in each state.


We act as an outsourced manager on behalf of states, for electronic access to records pertaining to motor vehicles and motor vehicle operators (driver history records) by users and certain permitted resellers. These records are the largest group of records for which we process electronic access for state agencies and are processed in most of our portal states.state enterprise businesses. These records contain “personal information” and “sensitive personal information” as defined by the federal Driver Privacy Protection Act, and state versions of that Act adopted in every state (collectively, the “DPPA”). The DPPA regulates categories and circumstances under which “personal information” and “sensitive personal information” may be disclosed to requesters.



18


Each state has procedures for complying with the DPPA, and such procedures may vary from state to state. We closely follow each state’s compliance procedures for general access, with our electronic access. If we fail to follow such procedures, or we grant access to users not in compliance with such procedures, or if such procedures are deemed inadequate in some way, our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition may be adversely affected. The DPPA permits statutory damages to be awarded to the subjects of such records, even without proof of actual damage, for certain infringements or violations of the DPPA. We may be potentially liable for such damages in such instances, and we may have no recourse against the state.

We may become liable for violations of certain laws applicable to privacy of health information concerning individuals.
 
Some of our business services involve the collection, transmission and use of an individual’s protected health information or other sensitive personal information, which may be subject to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act ("HIPAA") or other state privacy and security laws and regulations. In some cases, we also use aggregated and de-identified data as defined by HIPAA for analytical purposes, particularly related to improving the quality of services we provide. At the federal level, HIPAA imposes extensive privacy and security requirements governing the transmission, use and disclosure of health information. These increasingly complex laws, regulations and industry requirements are subject to change and compliance with them may result in significant expenses associated with increased operational and compliance costs, particularly as we continue to offer new services in this field. To the extent that either we or our vendors with whom we share information are found to be out of compliance with such applicable laws and regulations or experience a data security breach, we could be subject to litigation, regulatory risks, reputational harm and damages, fines or penalties. Failure to comply with federal or state statutes or regulations may also result in criminal penalties or civil sanctions.


We may become liable for violations of certain federal laws applicable to our federal PSP service or other services.

23



Our PSP service for the FMCSA requires that PSP record data be disclosed in compliance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) and the Safe, Accountable, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (“SAFETEA-LU”). We may also have other online services that are or become subject to the FCRA and/or SAFETEA-LU. If we fail to follow such procedures, or we grant access to users not in compliance with such procedures, or if such procedures are deemed inadequate in some way, we may become subject to monetary fines, penalties or damages, and our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition may be adversely affected. The FCRA and SAFETEA-LU permit statutory damages to be awarded to the subjects of such records, even without proof of actual damage, for certain infringements or violations. In addition, any failure to comply with the FCRA, SAFETEA-LU or other federal laws may result in reputational damage.


Compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance, public disclosure and other regulatory requirements or industry standards may resultRisks Relating to Conditions in additional expenses.

Changing laws, regulations, and standards relating to corporate governance, public disclosure and other regulatory requirements or industry standards, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, new SEC regulationsFinancial Markets and the Nasdaq Stock Market rules create uncertainty for public companies such as ours. These laws, regulations, and standards are subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We are committed to maintaining adequate and appropriate standards of corporate governance and public disclosure. As a result, our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations, and standards have resulted in, and certain regulations could continue to result in, increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Further, because of increasing regulation, our board members and executive officers could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified board members and executive officers, which could harm our business. If our efforts to comply with new or changed laws, regulations, and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities in the laws themselves or related to practice, our reputation may be harmed.Economy




19


If our competitors become more successful in developing and selling products for government-managed services, then our business could be adversely affected.

The principal alternative to our model is a government-designed and managed service that utilizes other vendors’ technologies, products, and services. Companies that have expertise in marketing and providing online services to government entities compete with us by further developing their services and increasing their focus on this area of their businesses. To the extent we can continue to expand our services in existing states and our contracts become more profitable, the competition in our markets may increase. Many of our potential competitors are national or international in scope and have greater resources than we do. These resources could enable our potential competitors to offer lower prices or take other measures to gain market share. Additionally, in some geographic areas, we may face competition from firms with established reputations and political relationships with potential government partners. If we do not compete effectively or if we experience any pricing pressures, reduced profit margins or loss of market share, our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition may be adversely affected.

We may be unable to integrate new technologies and industry standards effectively, which may adversely affect our business and results of operations.

Our future success will depend on our ability to enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality, and features of our services in accordance with industry standards and to address the increasingly sophisticated technological needs of our customers on a cost-effective and timely basis. Our ability to remain competitive will depend, in part, on our ability to:

enhance and improve the responsiveness, functionality, and other features of the government services we offer;
continue to develop our technical expertise;
develop and introduce new services, applications, and technology to meet changing customer needs and preferences; and
influence and respond to emerging industry standards and other technological changes in a timely and cost-effective manner.

We cannot ensure that we will be successful in responding to the above technological and industry challenges in a timely and cost-effective manner. If we are unable to integrate new technologies and industry standards effectively, our business could be harmed.

Our intellectual property rights are valuable and any inability to protect them could harm our company.

We regard our intellectual property as important to our success. We rely on a combination of nondisclosure and other contractual arrangements and policies with governments, our employees, prime contractors, subcontractors, vendors and other third parties, copyrights and privacy and trade secret laws to protect and limit the distribution of the proprietary applications, documentation and processes we have developed in connection with the services we offer. Despite our precautions, third parties may succeed in misappropriating our intellectual property or independently developing similar intellectual property. If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights and proprietary information, if we utilize open source software in a manner that places proprietary source code in the public domain, or if we become involved in litigation relating to our intellectual property rights and proprietary technology, our business could be harmed. Any actions we take may not be adequate to protect our proprietary rights, and other companies may develop technologies that are similar or superior to our proprietary technology.

Because we have certain contracts that contain indemnification provisions, we may suffer monetary liability and damages if claims arise under such contracts. In addition, any failure to meet our obligations under a contract, regardless of whether there is a claim for which we are liable, may result in reputational damage.

Performance deficiencies by us or our third-party vendors, including subcontractors, could result in a default under one or more of our contracts, which could expose us to liability and have an adverse effect on our business prospects, on our financial condition, and on our ability to compete for future contracts. Further, under certain contracts, we are required to fully indemnify our government partners against claims arising from our performance or the performance of our third-party



20


vendors, including subcontractors. If we fail to meet our contractual obligations, if our performance or our third-party vendors’ performance gives rise to claims, if our government partners are otherwise held liable for claims related to the services provided under our contracts, or if our government partners seek to hold us liable for claims or damages related to the services provided under our contracts, we could be subject to legal liability, monetary damages and loss of customer relationships. Additionally, in many of our contracts, our government partners do not indemnify us from losses related to their performance or non-performance.

Our business will suffer if we lose the right to provide access to the content filed or distributed through our digital government services or we are held liable for the content that we pass to users from government entities.

We do not own or create the content filed or distributed through the digital government services we operate. We depend on the governments with which we contract to supply information and data feeds to us on a timely basis to allow businesses and citizens to complete transactions and obtain government information. We cannot ensure that these data sources will continue to be available in the future. Government entities could terminate their contracts to provide data. Changes in regulations could mean that governments no longer collect some types of data or that the data is protected by more stringent privacy rules preventing uses now made of it. Moreover, our data sources are not always subject to exclusive agreements, so that data included in our services also may be included in those of our potential competitors. In addition, we depend upon the accuracy and reliability of government computer systems and data collection for the content distributed through the services we operate. The loss, unavailability, or inaccuracy of our data sources in the future, or the loss of our exclusive right to distribute some of the data sources, could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

Because we aggregate and digitally distribute private and sensitive public information, we may face potential liability for defamation, libel, negligence, invasion of privacy, and other claims based on the nature and content of the material that is published on or distributed through the digital government services we operate. Most of the agreements through which we obtain consent to disseminate this information do not contain indemnity provisions in our favor. These types of claims have been brought, sometimes successfully, against online services in the past. We cannot ensure that our insurance will be adequate to reimburse us for all liability that may be imposed. Any liability that is not covered by our insurance, or is in excess of our insurance coverage, could severely harm our business operations and financial condition.

We may need more working capital to fund operations and expand our business, and any failure to obtain such needed working capital would adversely affect our business.

Although we believe that our current financial resources and future cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet our present working capital and capital expenditure requirements and potential dividend payments for at least the next 12 months, we may need to raise additional capital before this period ends to further:

fund operations, if unforeseen costs or revenue shortfalls arise;
support our expansion into other states and federal government agencies beyond what is contemplated if unforeseen opportunities arise;
expand our product and service offerings beyond what is contemplated if unforeseen opportunities arise;
fund acquisitions;
respond to unforeseen competitive pressures; and
acquire technologies beyond what is contemplated.

Our future liquidity and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the success of our existing and new service offerings and potentially competing technological and market developments. However, any projections of future cash flows are subject to substantial uncertainty. If current cash, lines of credit, and cash generated from operations are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity securities, issue debt securities, or draw on the unused portion of our line of credit. If we need to obtain new debt or equity financing in the future, the terms and availability of such financing may be impacted by economic and financial market conditions, as well as our financial condition and results of operations at the time we seek additional financing. The sale of additional equity securities could result in dilution to our stockholders. From time to time, we expect to evaluate the acquisition of or investment in businesses



21


and technologies that complement our various digital government businesses. Acquisitions or investments might affect our liquidity requirements or cause us to sell additional equity securities or issue debt securities. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If adequate funds were not available on acceptable terms, our ability to develop or enhance our applications and services, take advantage of future opportunities, or respond to competitive pressures would be significantly limited. This limitation could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

Our quarterly results of operations may be volatile and difficult to predict. If our quarterly results of operations, future growth, profitability or dividends fail to meet the expectations of public market analysts or investors, the market price of our common stock may decrease significantly.

Our future revenues and results of operations may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to several factors, many of which are outside of our control, and any of which may harm our business. These factors include:

the commencement, completion, or termination of contracts during any quarter;
the introduction of new services by us or our competitors;
technical difficulties or system downtime affecting the operation of our services;
the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to the expansion of our business operations and infrastructure;
unexpected changes in federal, state and local legislation that increase our costs and/or result in a temporary or permanent decrease in our revenues;
the seasonal use of some of our services, particularly the accessing of motor vehicle driver history records;
changes in economic conditions;
the result of negative cash flows due to capital investments; and
significant charges related to acquisitions.

Due to the factors noted above and the other factors described in these Risk Factors, our financial performance in a quarter may be lower than we anticipate and if we are unable to reduce spending in that quarter, our results of operations for that quarter may be harmed. One should not rely on quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our results of operations as an indication of future performance. It is possible that in some future periods our results of operations may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this occurs, the price of our common stock may decline. In addition, if we fail to meet expectations related to future growth, profitability, dividends or other market expectations, the price of our common stock may decline.

Our payment of dividends in the future is subject to several risks and uncertainties, and any failure to pay dividends in the future or any reduction in the amount of future dividend payments may adversely affect our stockholders.

Although our Board of Directors has approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make, subject to subsequent declaration, regular quarterly cash dividends, the payment of future dividends is subject to several risks and uncertainties, and we may not pay quarterly dividends in the same amounts or at all in the future. Our Board monitors and evaluates our dividend practice quarterly and may elect to increase, decrease or not pay a dividend at any time. Our ability to pay dividends could be affected by future business performance, liquidity, capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and debt covenants associated with our line of credit. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends will be made at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend on our operating results, financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. Any future decisions to reduce or discontinue paying cash dividends to our stockholders could cause the trading price for our common stock to decline and could adversely affect our stockholders.




22


We may be subject to intellectual property infringement claims, which are costly to defend and could limit our ability to use certain technologies in the future.

We may become subject to claims alleging infringement of third-party intellectual property rights. Our portal contracts require us to indemnify our government partners for infringing software we build or use. Any claims could subject us to costly litigation and may require us to pay damages and develop non-infringing intellectual property or acquire licenses to the intellectual property that is the subject of the alleged infringement. Licenses for such intellectual property may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. Litigation regarding intellectual property rights is common in the internet and software industries. We expect third-party infringement claims involving internet technologies and software products and services to continue to increase. If an infringement claim is filed against us, we may be prevented from using certain technologies and may incur significant costs resolving the claim. We cannot ensure that our applications and services do not infringe on the intellectual property rights of third parties. In addition, we have agreed, and expect that we may agree in the future, to indemnify certain of our partners against claims that our services infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. We could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves and our partners against infringement claims.

We depend on technology licensed to us by third parties, and the loss of access to, or improper management of the licensing of this technology could delay implementation of our services or force us to pay higher license fees or fines.

We license numerous third-party technologies and applications that we incorporate into our existing service offerings, and on which, in the aggregate, we are substantially dependent. There can be no assurance that the licenses for such third-party technologies will not be terminated or that we will be able to license third-party technology and applications for future services. While we do not believe that one individual technology or application we license is material to our business, changes in or the loss of third-party licenses could lead to a material increase in the costs of licensing, or to our products becoming inoperable or their performance being materially reduced. The result could be that we may need to incur additional development or procurement costs to continue the performance of our services, and either the cost of such undertakings or the failure to successfully complete such undertakings could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition. Additionally, because of the decentralized nature of our operations, licensing of third-party technology can be complex and difficult to track and continually monitor. Our inability to do so could result in fines, an increase in licensing fees, or the temporary inability to utilize the third-party technology until licensing issues are resolved.


A prolonged economic slowdown could harm our operations.


A prolonged economic slowdown or recession could materially impact our operations to the extent it results in reduced demand for internet-based access to digital government services. In addition, it may hinder our efforts to obtain new business by distracting the attention of governments or impairing the ability of governments to hear or act upon our value proposition due to reduced personnel or turnover. These same factors may also jeopardize our renewal or rebid opportunities on existing contracts. If current market and economic conditions deteriorate, we may experience adverse impacts on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.


Our cash could be adversely affected if any of the financial institutions in which we hold our cash fails or becomes subject to other adverse conditions in the financial or credit markets.


Our cash primarily includes cash on hand in the form of bank deposits. We maintain our cash with major financial institutions. Deposits with these financial institutions exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance limits. At December 31, 2018,2020, the amount of cash covered by FDIC deposit insurance was $8.5$9.7 million, and $183.2$226.8 million of cash was above the FDIC deposit insurance limits. These balances and our liquidity could be affected if one or more of the financial institutions with which we deposit funds fails or becomes subject to other adverse conditions in the financial or credit markets. To date, we have experienced no loss or lack of adequate access to our cash; however, we can provide no assurance that access to our liquidity will not be impacted or that we will not lose deposited funds in excess of FDIC insurance limits as a result of the failure or insolvency of any these financial institutions or adverse conditions in the financial and credit markets.


If our rate of growth accelerates, weRecent and potential future acquisitions involve inherent risks that may not effectively manage our growth, which couldmaterially adversely affect our business and our results of operations.


To expand our operations and grow our market and client base, we may seek and complete strategic acquisitions and other business combinations in the future. Acquisitions have inherent risks which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. In particular,

The pursuit of acquisitions and execution of integration plans may divert the attention of our management from other key responsibilities;
We may fail to successfully integrate the business and financial operations, business culture, services, intellectual property, solutions or personnel of an acquired business;
We may assume unanticipated liabilities and contingencies;
We may substantially reduce our cash position, become significantly leveraged because of incurring debt or issue additional equity to finance one or more acquisitions; and
Our earnings per share may be diluted because of acquisitions.





2324




Our growth rate may accelerate if we experience increased acceptance of our services under new or existing government contracts. If we cannot managefail to identify suitable potential acquisition candidates, fail to successfully integrate acquired businesses or to fail to implement our growth effectively,business strategies with respect to these acquisitions, we may not be able to coordinateachieve projected results or support the activitiesamount of our technical, accounting,consideration paid for such acquired businesses, and marketing staffs, and our business could be harmed. As part of our growth plan, we must implement new operational procedures and internal controls to expand, train, and manage our employees and to coordinate the operations of our various subsidiaries. If we cannot successfully implement government contracts that were recently awarded or may be awarded in the future in a timely and cost-effective manner or effectively manage the growth of the digital government services we operate, our staff, software installation and maintenance teams, offices and operations, our business and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.


We are subject to independent audits as requested by our government customers. Deficiencies in our performance under a government contract could result in contract termination, reputational damage, or financial penalties.

Each government entity with which we contract may have the authority to require an independent audit of our performance and financial management of contracted operations in each respective state. The scope of audits could include inspections of income statements, balance sheets, fee structures, collections practices, service levels, security practices, and our compliance with contract provisions and applicable laws, regulations, and standards. The expansion of our operations into new markets and services may further expose us to requirements and potential liabilities under additional statutes and rules that have previously not been relevant to our business. We cannot ensure that a future audit will not find any material performance deficiencies that would result in an adjustment to our revenues and result in financial penalties. Moreover, any consequent negative publicity could harm our reputation among other governments with which we would like to contract. These factors could harm our business, results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


None.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES


Our principal administrative office occupies a total of approximately 51,000 square feet of leased space at 25501 West Valley Parkway, Suite 300, Olathe, Kansas 66061. All our subsidiaries also lease their facilities. We do not own any real property and do not currently anticipate acquiring real property or buildings in the foreseeable future.property.


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


Litigation


We are involved from time to time in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. However, we are not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.


ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


Not applicable.





25
24



PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Market Information


Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol “EGOV.”“EGOV”.


As of February 11, 2019,24, 2021, there were approximately 199210 holders of record of shares of our common stock.


Dividends and Share Repurchases


Refer to Note 10, Stockholders' Equity, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding dividends.


During the fourth quarter of 2018,2020, we acquired and cancelledcanceled shares of common stock surrendered by employees to pay income taxes due upon the vesting of restricted stock as follows:
PeriodTotal Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price
Paid per Share
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
October 1 - October 31, 20201,855 $21.37 — 21,062 
Total1,855 $21.37 — 
Period Total Number of Shares Purchased 
Average Price
Paid per Share
 
Total Number of
Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
October 9, 2018 188
 $14.30
 N/A N/A
October 11, 2018 637
 $14.07
 N/A N/A
October 12, 2018 316
 $14.16
 N/A N/A
October 13, 2018 182
 $14.16
 N/A N/A
Total 1,323
 $14.14
 N/A N/A


(1) In March 2018, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a stock buyback program allowing the Company to repurchase up to $25 million of our common stock. Share repurchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements and may be made under a Rule 10b5-1 plan. No purchases have been made under this program.







2526





Performance Graph


The performance graph below compares the annual change in our cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock during a period commencing on December 31, 2013,2015, and ending on December 31, 20182020 (as measured by dividing (i) the sum of (A) the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment and (B) the difference between our share price at the end and the beginning of the measurement period; by (ii) the share price at the beginning of the measurement period) with the cumulative total return of each of: (a) the Nasdaq Composite (U.S.) Index, and (b) a Peer Group described belowthe Russell 2000 Index assuming a $100 investment on December 31, 2013.2015. The stock price performance on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of our future stock price performance.


Comparison of Cumulative Total Return Among
NIC, Inc., Nasdaq Composite (U.S.) Index and a Peer GroupRussell 2000 Index
nicstockgrapha02.jpg
egov-20201231_g2.jpg
Total Return Analysis12/31/201312/31/201412/31/201512/31/201612/31/201712/31/2018Total Return Analysis12/31/201512/31/201612/31/201712/31/201812/31/201912/31/2020
NIC Inc.$100.00
$75.54
$82.64
$105.95
$74.90
$57.61
NIC Inc.$100.00 $128.21 $90.64 $69.72 $127.01 $149.13 
Nasdaq Composite$100.00
$113.40
$119.89
$128.89
$165.29
$158.87
Nasdaq Composite$100.00 $107.50 $137.86 $132.51 $179.19 $257.38 
Peer Group$100.00
$99.64
$132.20
$131.76
$177.25
$167.61
Russell 2000Russell 2000$100.00 $119.48 $135.18 $118.72 $146.89 $173.86 

While not all of the 14 companies in the Peer Group provide services exclusively to governments, each company has a business focus, customer focus or business model generally similar to that of NIC. The Peer Group is comprised of: ACI Worldwide, Inc. (ACIW), j2 Global, Inc. (JCOM), CoStar Group, Inc. (CSGP), Blackbaud, Inc. (BLKB), Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT), Tyler Technologies, Inc. (TYL), Perficient, Inc. (PRFT), Bottomline Technologies, Inc. (EPAY), DHI Group, Inc. (DHX), LogMeIn, Inc. (LOGM), Ebix, Inc. (EBIX), LivePerson, Inc. (LPSN), VASCO Data Security International, Inc. (VDSI), and Stamps.com, Inc. (STMP). As a result of being taken private in 2018, XO Group, Inc. (XOXO) was removed from the Peer Group.


The performance graph and related text are being furnished to and not filed with the SEC, and will not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except to the extent we specifically incorporate such information by reference into such a filing.










2627



ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


The selected financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” included in this Form 10-K (amounts in thousands in the tables below, except per share data).
 
 Year Ended December 31,
 20202019201820172016
Consolidated Statement of Income Data:
Total revenues$460,454 $354,205 $344,900 $336,508 $317,915 
Operating income before income taxes87,433 62,419 75,060 78,337 77,858 
Net income68,594 50,430 58,269 51,614 55,833 
Net income per share - basic1.01 0.75 0.87 0.77 0.84 
Net income per share - diluted1.01 0.75 0.87 0.77 0.84 
Dividends declared per share0.36 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.65 

December 31,
20202019201820172016
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets$464,349 $362,359 $310,526 $295,731 $240,862 
Long-term debt (includes current portion of notes payable/capital lease obligations)— — — — — 
Total stockholders' equity293,149 245,928 211,689 168,242 133,903 




28
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Consolidated Statement of Income Data:         
Total revenues$344,900
 $336,508
 $317,915
 $292,376
 $272,097
Operating income before income taxes75,060
 78,337
 77,858
 67,295
 63,014
Net income58,269
 51,614
 55,833
 41,979
 39,058
Net income per share - basic0.87
 0.77
 0.84
 0.63
 0.59
Net income per share - diluted0.87
 0.77
 0.84
 0.63
 0.59
Dividends declared per share0.32
 0.32
 0.65
 0.55
 0.50

 December 31,
 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:         
Total assets$310,526
 $295,731
 $240,862
 $241,237
 $172,039
Long-term debt (includes current portion of notes payable/capital lease obligations)
 
 
 
 
Total stockholders' equity211,689
 168,242
 133,903
 115,806
 104,137





27



ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


This section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in this Form 10-K.
Cautions about Forward-Looking Statements

CAUTIONS ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K regarding NIC Inc. and its subsidiaries (referred to herein as “the Company”, “NIC”, “we”, “our” or “us”) and its business, which are not current or historical facts, are “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements of plans and objectives, statements of future economic performance or financial projections, statements regarding the planned implementation of new portal contracts and new projects under existing portal contracts, the expected length of contract terms, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, statements relating to our expected effective tax rate, statements relating to possible future dividends and share repurchases, statements regarding the expected effects of changes in accounting standards, statements of assumptions underlying such statements, statements relatingrelated to possible future dividendsthe ongoing effects the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have on our business and financial results, including statements related to the duration, profitability and unsatisfied performance obligations of our COVID-19 testing solution, and statements of our intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations, or predictions of the future. For example, statements like we “expect,” we “believe,” we “plan,” we “intend,” or we “anticipate” are forward-looking statements. Investors should be aware that our actual operating results and financial performance may differ materially from our expressed expectations because of risks and uncertainties about the future including those risks discussed in this 20182020 Annual Report on Form 10-K.


There are a number of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those suggested or indicated by such forward-looking statements. These include, among others, our success in renewing existing contracts and in signing contracts with new states and with federal and state government agencies; our ability to successfully increase the adoption and use of digital government services; the possibility of security breaches or disruptions through cyber attackscyber-attacks or other events and any resulting liability; our ability to implement new contracts and any related technology enhancements in a timely and cost-effectivecost effective manner; the possibility of reductions in fees or revenues as a result of budget deficits, government shutdowns, or changes in government policy; continued favorable government legislation; acceptance of digital government services by businesses and citizens; our ability to identify and acquire suitable acquisition candidates and to successfully integrate any acquired businesses; competition; general economic conditions; and the other factorsongoing effects the COVID-19 pandemic is expected to have on our business and financial results, including statements relating to the duration, profitability and unsatisfied performance obligations of strategic initiatives developed in response to COVID-19, as well as on our government agency partners, workforce and citizen consumers, as discussed under “CAUTIONS ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS” in Part I and “RISK FACTORS” in Part I, Item 1A of this 20182020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Investors should read all of these discussions of risks carefully.


All forward-looking statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K speak only as of the date of this report. Except as may be required by law, we will not update the information in this 20182020 Annual Report on Form 10-K if any forward-looking statement later turns out to be inaccurate. Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statement.


What We Do – An Executive SummaryOVERVIEW OF OUR BUSINESS MODEL


We are a leading provider of digital government services and payment solutions that help governments use technology to provide a higher level of service to businesses and citizens and increase efficiencies. We accomplish this currently through two channels: our primary outsourced portalstate enterprise businesses and our software & services businesses.


In our primary outsourced portal business,state enterprise businesses, we generally enter into contracts primarily with state and local governments to design, build, and operate internet-based digital government services and payment solutions on an enterprise-wide basis on their behalf. We typically enter into multi-year contracts and manage operations for each government partner through separate local subsidiaries that operate as decentralized businesses with a high degree of autonomy. The internet-based digital services that we build allow businesses and citizens to access government information through multiple online channels including mobile, and complete secure transactions. These transactions include applying for a permit, retrieving government records, or filing a government-mandated form or report. We help increase our government partners’ revenues by expanding the distribution of their information assets and increasing the number of financial transactions conducted with governments. We do this by marketing portal services and soliciting users to complete government-based transactions and to enter into subscriber contracts that permit users to access the portal and the government information contained therein in exchange for transactional and/or subscription user fees.


29


payments. We are typically responsible for funding the up-front investmentsdevelopment and ongoing operations and maintenance costs of the digital government services. Our unique business model allows us to generate revenues by sharing in the transaction fees collected from onlinedigital government services and payment transactions. Our government partners benefit because they reduce their financial and technological risks, increase their operational efficiencies, avoid costs and gain a centralized, customer-focused presence on the internet, while businesses and citizens gain a faster, more convenient, and more cost-effective means to interact with governments.




28



On behalf of our government partners, we enter into statements of work with various agencies and divisions of the government to provide specific services and to conduct specific transactions. These statements of work preliminarily establish thepreliminary pricing of the online transactions and data access services we provide and the division of revenues between us and the government agency. The government oversight authority must approve prices and revenue sharing agreements. We have limited control over the level of transaction fees we are permitted to retain. Any changes made to the amount or percentage of transaction fees retained by us, or to the amounts charged for the services offered, could materially affect the profitability of the respective contract. We typically own all the intellectual property in connection withrelated to the applications developed under these contracts. After completion of a defined contract term or upon termination for cause, the government partner typically receives a perpetual, royalty-free license to use the applications and digital government services we built only in its own state. However, certain enterprise applications and proprietary customer management, billing, payment processing or other applications that we have developed and standardized centrally and that are utilized by our portal businesses, are provided to most of our government partners on a software-as-a-service (“SaaS”)SaaS basis, and thus would not be included in any royalty-free license. If our contract expires after a defined term or if our contract is terminated by our government partner for cause, the government agency would be entitled to take over the servicesowned or licensed applications in place, and NIC would have no future revenue from, or obligation to, such former government partner, except as otherwise provided in the contract.

Most of our state enterprise revenues are generated from transaction-based services for interactive government services ("IGS") and driver history records ("DHR"), which represented approximately 63% and 26% of state enterprise revenues in 2020, respectively. These transaction-based revenues are highly correlated to state population but are also affected by pricing policies established by government entities for public records, the number and growth of commercial enterprises, and the government entity’s development of policy and information technology infrastructure supporting digital government. In 2020, transaction-based revenues consisted of approximately 65% business-to-government transactions and 35% citizen-to-government transactions.

The highest volume service we offer in the state enterprise business is digital access to DHRs. This service accounted for approximately 19%, 26% and 29% of our total consolidated revenues in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We currently believe that while this service will continue to be an important source of revenue, its contribution as a percentage of total consolidated revenues will decline modestly over time as other sources grow. In addition, in several of our states we offer interactive government services for online motor vehicle registration and licensing. This service accounted for approximately 11%, 11% and 14% of our total consolidated revenues in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

A primary source of revenue is derived from data resellers, such as LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which have entered into contracts with our government partners to request DHR records from the various states with which we have contracts. Under the terms of these contracts, our government partners have us provide data resellers with access to retrieve driver history records. For each state, the fee per record is the same for all entities that access DHR records. We generally earn a fixed-fee based on the number of requests processed for the government partner. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which resells these records to the auto insurance industry, accounted for approximately 11%, 15% and 19% of our total consolidated revenues in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Data reseller contracts are generally self-renewing until canceled by one side or the other, and generally may be terminated at any time after a 30-day notice. Furthermore, these contracts are immediately terminable if the state statute allowing for the public release of these records is repealed.

We charge for digital access to government services based on usage and, depending upon government policies, also on a fixed or sliding scale bulk basis. Our fees are set by negotiation with the government agencies that control the records or services and are typically approved by a government sanctioned oversight authority. Generally, our contracts outline the total fee to be paid by the end-user consumer, as well as our share of the fee. We have limited control over the level of fees we are permitted to retain. We recognize revenues from transactions (primarily information access fees and filing fees) as we provide access to applications and process transactions initiated by end-user consumers. We bill certain end-user consumers, including high-volume DHR data resellers to the auto insurance industry, monthly. We typically receive


30


most payments within 25 days of billing and remit payment to governments within 30 to 45 days of the transaction. The gross fees that we collect on behalf of government agencies for data access are accrued as accounts receivable and accounts payable at the time revenue from the access of public information is recognized. We typically must remit a certain amount or percentage of these fees to government agencies regardless of whether we ultimately collect the fees. The pricing of transactions varies by the type of transaction and by state.

Our state enterprise businesses also provide non-recurring application development services for our government partners on either a time and materials or fixed-fee basis and generally recognize revenues over time as services are provided. Development services revenues represented approximately 10% of state enterprise revenues in 2020. Fixed-fee services for our government partner in the state of Indiana represented approximately 1% of state enterprise revenues in 2020.

In our software & services businesses, we provide certain payment processing services, software development and digital
government services, other than those provided on an enterprise-wide basis, to a few private sector entities and tofederal agencies, as well as state and local agencies
governments. Generally, our software & services contracts include SaaS contracts, payment processing contracts and, to a lesser degree, software development contracts. In August 2020, we began offering new rapid and secure COVID-19 testing solution TourHealth, featuring digital engagement, assessment and scheduling, as well as in-person clinical testing and logistics. This service accounted for approximately 13% of our total consolidated revenues in states where we do not maintain an enterprise-wide outsourced portal contract and may continue to market these services to other entities in the future. Historically, revenues from these services have not been significant, but have grown in recent years. In some cases, we enter into contracts to provide consulting, application development and portal management services to governments in exchange for an agreed-upon fee.2020.


Our objective is to strengthen our position as the leading provider of digital government services. Key strategies to achieve this objective include:


Renew all current outsourced government contracts –contracts: First and foremost, we will strive to renew all currently profitable government contracts. We currently have 1011 contracts under which we provide enterprise-wide digital government services, as well as our contract with the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration ("FMCSA"),FMCSA, that have expiration dates within the 12-month period following December 31, 2018.
2020. For additional information on our current government contracts, please refer to Note 3, Outsourced Government Contracts, of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Win new government contracts –contracts: A key objective of ours is to win new contracts with federal, state and local government agencies. We continue to invest heavily in business development and marketing efforts, including a combination of strategic advertising and public relations initiatives. We have responded to several active procurement opportunities and realized significant benefits from our investments, including contracts with new government partners in recent years.

Our goal is to continue expanding our number of government partners by leveraging our strong relationships with current government partners and our reputation for providing proven digital government solutions. We intend to continue marketing our services to new governments in federal, state and local jurisdictions.services. Our expansion efforts include developing relationships and sponsors throughout an individual government entity, pursuing strategic technology alliances, making presentations at conferences of government executives with responsibility for information technology policy and developing contacts with organizations that act as forums for discussions between these executives.


Increase transactional revenues from our existing government portals –businesses: Part of our strategy is to increase transactional revenues from our existing government contracts by building new applications and services, taking successful applications and services and implementing them in other states and increasing the adoption of existing applications and services within each state where we operate. We intend to accomplish this with new service offerings, increased operational focus and expanded marketing initiatives. In addition, we will work closely with the governance authority for each of our government partners to evaluate the pricing of new and existing services to encourage higher usage and increase revenue streams. We plan to continue our development of new secure online transactional services that enable government agencies to interact more effectively and efficiently with businesses, citizens and other government agencies through multiple online channels, including mobile. We will continue to work with government agencies, professional associations and other organizations to better understand the current and future needs of end use customers.end-user consumers. We will continue to work with our government partners to create awareness of the online alternatives to traditional government interactions through initiatives such as informational brochures and inclusion of website information on government communication materials. In addition, we will



29


continue to update our partners and end user customersend-user consumers to highlight new government service information. We plan to work with professional associations to directly and indirectly communicate to their members the potential convenience, ease of use and other benefits of the services we offer on behalf of our government partners.



31



Continue to grow profitability:In addition to overall portaldriving revenue growth which includes both organic revenue growthfor new and growthexisting contracts, part of our strategy is to increase profitability by driving cost efficiency efforts throughout our Company that fosters entrepreneurial decision-making and innovation and accentuates the potential financial leverage of our business model.

REVENUES

We classify our revenues into two primary categories: (1) state enterprise and (2) software & services. Each of these categories are described below:

State Enterprise Revenues: We earn revenues from newour subsidiaries operating enterprise-wide state contracts anto provide digital government services to multiple government agencies. We categorize our state enterprise revenues into three main sources: transaction-based fees, development services and fixed-fee services. Transaction-based revenues and fixed-fee revenues are generally recurring while development revenues are generally non-recurring. An important financial metric that we use to gauge our success in increasing transactional revenues in our existing portalstate enterprise businesses is same state revenue growth. We define same state revenues as revenues from states under contract and generating comparable revenues for two full comparable periods.

Our long-term goal is to grow same state revenues at our historical average of approximately 8-10%more than 8% per year. Same state portal revenues grew 9% in 2018 compared to 6% in 2017. RevenuesEach revenue source is further described below:

Transaction-based:

IGS: fees from a wide variety of interactive government services, or IGS, primarily consist of transaction fees generated by means other than from providing electronicdigital access to motor vehicle driver history records, or DHR.for transactions conducted by businesses and end-user consumers. For a representative listing of the IGS applications we currently offer through our state enterprise businesses in conjunction with our government partners, refer to Part I, Item 1 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As IGS revenues continue to become a larger component of overall portalstate enterprise revenues, our growth in same state IGS revenues becomes more important to our overall growth as a company. Samegrowth.
DHR: fees from driver history records for providing data resellers, insurance companies, and other pre-authorized customers digital access to state IGS revenues grew 11% in both 2018 and 2017.

Growth in DHR revenues is also an important factor in our goal for overall same state revenue growth. Historically, DHR price increases have been relatively infrequent, and our ability to grow same state DHR revenues has been limited, as such revenues have been driven by broader economic factors outsidemotor vehicle driver history records on behalf of our control.state partners. Absent DHR price increases, same state DHR revenue growth has historically ranged from flat to 4% per year. Same state DHR
Development Services: revenues increased by 3% in 2018 driven primarily by a price increase in one state, compared to 1% in 2017.

Continue to grow profitability – In addition to driving same state portal revenue growth, partfrom the performance of our strategy is to increase profitability by driving cost containment efforts throughout the Companysoftware development projects and maintaining a lean organizational structure that fosters entrepreneurial decision-makingother time and innovation and accentuates the potential financial leverage of our business model.

An important financial metric that we use to gauge our portal profitability is portal gross profit percentage, or gross profit rate, which is calculated by dividing portal gross profit (portal revenues minus cost of portal revenues, excluding depreciation and amortization) by portal revenues. Our portal gross profit rate was 39% in 2018, 38% in 2017 and 39% in 2016. We carefully monitor our portal gross profit percentage to strike the balance between generating a solid returnmaterials services for our stockholders and delivering value togovernment partners. While we actively market these services, they do not have the same degree of predictability as our transaction-based or fixed-fee services.
Fixed-Fee Services: our state enterprise business in Indiana earns fixed-fees from the performance of digital government partners through reinvestment in our portal businesses (which we believe also benefits our stockholders).services for numerous government agencies.


Software & Services Revenues: We also view selling & administrative expenses, expressed as a percentage of total consolidated revenues, to be an important indicator of the relative year-over-year growth in our corporate level expenses and financial leverage of our overall business. Selling & administrative expenses as a percentage of total consolidated revenues were 16% for 2018 and 15% for 2017 and 2016.

Finally, our consolidated operating income margin (operating income before income taxes divided by total consolidated revenues) is an important measure of our overall profitability. This metric was 22% in 2018, 23% in 2017 and 24% in 2016.

Overview of Business Models and Revenue Recognition

We classify our revenues and cost of revenues into two categories: (1) portal and (2) software & services. The portal category includes revenues and cost of revenues primarily from our subsidiaries operating state and local government portals on an outsourced basis. The software & services category primarily includes revenues and cost ofearn revenues from our subsidiariesbusinesses that provide software development and digital government services, other than enterprise-wide portalthose services provided under state enterprise contracts, to federal agencies as well as state and local governments. Our Software & Services revenues are primarily transaction-based and classified as Payments, Federal, TourHealth and Other. Each of these revenue types is further described below:

Payments: primarily transaction-based fees from contracts with state and local governments as well as federal agencies. We currently earnfor payment processing-related, transaction-based services that are not part of an enterprise-wide state contract. The majority of revenues from three main sources:these sources are generally recurring.
Federal: primarily transaction-based, fees software developmentfrom contracts with certain Federal agencies in the United States, including the FMCSA, to manage the PSP and transaction-based revenues we earn as a subcontractor to Booz Allen Hamilton on its Recreation.gov contract. The majority of our Federal revenues are generally recurring under the respective contracts.
TourHealth: a combination of fixed-fee and per test-based fees for application developmentfrom contracts pertaining to our new TourHealth solution, which utilizes our citizen-engagement technology platform, Gov2Go®, to provide rapid and fixed fees for portal management services.


secure COVID-19 testing. TourHealth commenced operations and began to generate revenues in August




3032



Our outsourced portal2020 and has contracted for testing services with certain government entities extending into the first quarter of 2021. It is possible services will continue beyond the first quarter of 2021 depending on the severity and duration of the pandemic and the testing needs of states, correctional facilities and higher education institutions across the US.
Other: primarily implementation and SaaS subscription revenues from our RxGov prescription drug monitoring business and our recently acquired NIC Licensing Solutions regulatory licensing business. The majority of revenues from these sources are recurring.

OPERATING EXPENSES

The primary categories of operating expenses include: cost of revenues, selling & administrative, enterprise technology & product support, and depreciation & amortization. Each of these categories are described below:

Cost of Revenues: Consists of all direct costs associated with providing digital government services and payment solutions for both our state enterprise and software & services businesses and excludes depreciation & amortization. We categorize cost of revenues between fixed and variable costs:


In our outsourced state and local portal businesses, we provide continuous access to enterprise-wide digital services that allow end users to complete secure transactions,Fixed costs: include costs such as applyingemployee compensation and benefits (including stock-based compensation), subcontractor labor and other costs, telecommunications costs, provision for losses on accounts receivable, and all other costs associated with the provision of dedicated client service such as dedicated office facilities.

Variable costs: fluctuate with the level of revenues and primarily include interchange fees required to process credit/debit card transactions, bank fees to process automated clearinghouse transactions and, to a permit, retrieving government records, or filing a government-mandated form or report. Mostmuch lesser extent, costs associated with revenue share arrangements with certain state partners. A significant percentage of our portaltransaction-based revenues are generated from transaction-based servicesonline applications whereby users pay for information or transactions via credit/debit cards. We typically earn a portion of the credit/debit card transaction amount, but also must pay an associated interchange fee to the financial institution that processes the credit/debit card transaction. We earn a lower incremental gross profit percentage on these transactions as compared to our DHR and other IGS and DHR, which represented approximately 63% and 31% of portal revenues in 2018, respectively. Transaction-based revenues from our outsourced state portal business units are highly correlatedtransactions. However, we plan to state population but are also affected by pricing policies established by government entities for public records, the number and growth of commercial enterprises, and the government entity’s development of policy and information technology infrastructure supporting digital government. Transaction-based revenues consisted of approximately 70% business-to-government transactions and 30% citizen-to-government transactions.

The highest volume, most commercially valuable service we offer in the portal business is digital access to driver history records. This service accounted for approximately 29%, 31% and 33% of our total consolidated revenues in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We currently believe that while this service will continue to be an important source of revenue, its contribution as a percentage of total consolidated revenues on an individual basis will decline modestly as other sources grow. In addition, in several of our states we offer interactive governmentimplement these services for online motor vehicle registration and licensing. This service accounted for approximately 14% of our total consolidated revenues in 2018, 2017 and 2016.

A primary source of revenue is derived from data resellers, such as LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which have entered into contracts withbecause they are needed by our government partners and they contribute favorably to request DHR records from the various states with which we have contracts. Under the termsour operating income growth.

Selling & Administrative: This category consists primarily of these contracts, the government partners have us provide data resellers with accesscorporate-level expenses (including all forms of compensation and benefits) relating to retrieve driver history records. For each state, the fee per record is the same formarket development and sales, marketing, human resource management, corporate communications and public relations, administration, legal, finance and accounting, internal audit and other non-customer service-related costs.

Enterprise Technology & Product Support: This category consists primarily of corporate-level expenses (including all entities that access DHR records. We generally earn a fixed fee based on the numberforms of requests processed for the government partner. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, which resells these records to the auto insurance industry, accounted for approximately 19%, 19%compensation and 22% of our total consolidated revenues in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Data reseller contracts are generally self-renewing until canceled by one side or the other, and generally may be terminated at any time after a 30-day notice. Furthermore, these contracts are immediately terminable if the state statute allowing for the public release of these records is repealed.

We charge for digital access to government services based on usage and, depending upon government policies, also on a fixed or sliding scale bulk basis. Our fees are set by negotiation with the government agencies that control the records and are typically approved by a government sanctioned oversight authority. Generally, our contracts outline the total fee to be paid by the end-user consumer, as well as our share of the fee. We have limited control over the level of fees we are permitted to retain. We recognize revenues from transactions (primarily information access fees and filing fees) as we provide access to applications and process transactions initiated by end-user consumers. We bill certain end-user consumers, including high-volume DHR data resellers to the auto insurance industry, monthly. We typically receive most payments within 25 days of billing and remit payment to governments within 30 to 45 days of the transaction. The gross fees that we collect on behalf of government agencies for data access are accrued as accounts receivable and accounts payable at the time revenue from the access of public information is recognized. We typically must remit a certain amount or percentage of these fees to government agencies regardless of whether we ultimately collect the fees. The pricing of transactions varies by the type of transaction and by state.

Our outsourced portal businesses also provide non-recurring application development servicesbenefits) for our government partners on either a time and materials or fixed fee basis and generally recognize revenues over time as services are provided. Portal softwareinformation technology, product development and services revenues represented approximately 4%security teams that support our centrally hosted data center infrastructure and centrally developed SaaS payment processing solutions, government agency SaaS products, including outdoor recreation, healthcare and regulatory licensing, and other SaaS platform solutions, including our citizen-centric Gov2Go® enterprise platform and enterprise microservices and internal development platforms.

Depreciation & Amortization: This category consists of portal revenues in 2018. The remaining portal revenues consistdepreciation of fixed fee portal management services for our current government partner in the stateassets and amortization of Indiana which represented approximately 2% of portal revenues in 2018.

The majority of the costs incurred by us to obtain a contract, which primarily consist of salaries of business development employees working to obtain the contract, are fixed in nature, occur regardless of whether a contract is obtained and are expensed as incurred. We expense as incurred all employee costs to start up, operate, and maintain outsourced government portals as costs of performance under the contracts because, after the completion of a defined contract term, the government entity with which we contract typically receives a perpetual, royalty-free license to the applications weboth internally developed except applications provided on a SaaS basis. Such costs are included in cost of portal revenues in the consolidated statements of



31


income. Other costs to fulfill a contract such as the procurement of property and equipment and certain software development costs are accounted for under other authoritative guidance.

Our software & services businesses

In our software and services businesses, we provide digital government services, other than on an enterprise-wide basis, to state and local governmentsintangible assets purchased as well as federal agencies. A primary sourcepart of revenue is associated with our contract with FMSCA to develop and manage the PSP for motor carriers nationwide, using a transaction-based business model. We recognize revenues from this contract (primarily information access fees) as we provide access to the service and process transactions. Our software and services businesses also earn revenue from fixed fee and time and materials application development and outsourced maintenance contracts with other government agencies and generally recognize revenues over time as services are provided.acquisitions.



Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

33
Many


CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Certain estimates and assumptions involved in the application of generally accepted accounting principles have a material impact on our reported financial condition and operating performance and on the comparability of such reported information over different reporting periods. A critical accounting policy is one which is both important and material to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often because of the need to make estimates and assumptions about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We have identified the policy below as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations. There are other items within our financial statements that require management to make estimates and assumptions, but are not deemed critical, that may affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management’s application of accounting policies. OurThose significant accounting policies and recent accounting pronouncements not yet adopted are described in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Uncertain tax positions

NOVEL CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 19 ("COVID-19")
The application
We are monitoring the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and have been actively working with our government partners to assist them with the impact. As the outbreak progressed in the United States in 2020 and the vast majority of income tax law is inherently complex. Lawsstates issued stay-at-home orders, starting mostly in the latter part of March and regulationscontinuing through April and most of May, we saw a decrease in this areavolumes for certain services we operate on behalf of our government partners, including driver history record services and interactive government services, the federal Pre-Employment Screening Program we operate on behalf of the Department of Transportation Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, and the federal Recreation.gov outdoor recreation service we operate as a subcontractor in conjunction with Booz Allen Hamilton, among other services. We also saw a shift from certain in-person, over-the-counter transactions conducted in brick-and-mortar government offices, many of which were temporarily closed, to those we manage digitally online for our government agency partners. In addition, we saw several government agency partners extend deadlines 60 to 90 days for certain required filings and renewals. These actions negatively impacted the volume of transaction we processed and the amount of revenues we recognized for many services in March and throughout the second quarter of 2020. However, we saw an improvement in volumes for many services starting in late May and continuing throughout the third and fourth quarters of 2020 as stay-at-home orders were lifted, federal parks reopened and extensions for certain required filings and renewals expired. In addition, we recently launched a new service offering, TourHealth, which utilizes our technology to provide a rapid and secure solution for COVID-19 testing. In the second half of 2020, TourHealth provided testing services for the states of Florida, South Carolina and Kansas as well as the Alabama Department of Corrections and the University of Mississippi, which positively impacted our financial results for the year.

We currently anticipate the COVID-19 pandemic may have a prolonged negative impact on broader economic conditions in the United States, which may impact our results of operations in the future. While we have not incurred any significant disruptions to our business activities or services resulting from the pandemic, we have temporarily restricted all business travel, closed all Company offices and shifted to remote operations for an indefinite period to ensure social distancing and the health and safety of our employees. We believe we are voluminouscurrently operating efficiently and continue to effectively manage the overall impact of the pandemic on our business with a remote workforce. We are actively monitoring the situation and are often ambiguous. We are also subjectassessing further possible implications to periodic audits byour business and we will continue to take aggressive actions to mitigate potential adverse consequences, such as operational contingency planning and testing, key personnel succession planning, enhanced employee and government tax authoritiespartner communication protocols, travel restrictions and cost containment efforts to buffer potential future revenue declines. See “RISK FACTORS” in Part I, Item 1A of our income tax returns. We are required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding our income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time. Changes in our subjective assumptions and judgments can materially affect amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets and statements of income. See Note 11, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statementsthis 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional detail on our uncertain tax positionsdiscussion regarding the risks associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and those risks related accounting policies. Had our uncertain tax positions changed by 10% from our estimated liability at December 31, 2018, the financial impact would have been approximately $0.9 million, or 1.1%, of our pretax income for the year ended December 31, 2018.to a prolonged economic slowdown, among other risk factors.





Financial Analysis of Years Ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 201634




RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

In this section, we are providing more detailed information about our operating results and changes in financial position over the past three years. This section should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes included in this Form 10-K.


We use same state revenue growth to measure the financial performance of our state portals that generate revenues for two full comparative periods. Due to the expiration of our contract with the state of Iowa on November 30, 2016, the operating results for this state were removed from the same state category for the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, our contract with the state of Tennessee expired on March 31, 2017; however, due to the ongoing transition of services back to the state throughout the fourth quarter of 2016, the operating results for this state were removed from the same state category for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The operating results for our Louisiana portal, which commenced on July 1, 2016, were excluded from the same state category for 2017 and 2016 because it had not generated revenues for two full comparable periods. Because our legacy Texas contract expired on August 30, 2018 and our new Texas payment processing contract commenced on September 1, 2018, operating results for this state were removed from the same state category for the year end December 31, 2018. Furthermore, our Illinois contract, which we entered into in



32


2017, was removed from the same state category for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018 because it did not generate revenues for two full comparable periods.

Results of Operations

Key Financial Metrics2018 2017 2016
Revenue growth - portals3 % 5% 9%
Same state revenue growth - portals9 % 6% 8%
Recurring portal revenue as a % of total portal revenues96 % 97% 96%
Gross profit % - portals39 % 38% 39%
Revenue growth - software & services(3)% 20% 11%
Gross profit % - software & services63 % 65% 72%
Selling & administrative expenses as a % of total revenues16 % 15% 15%
Operating income margin % (operating income as a % of total revenues)22 % 23% 24%

PortalTotal Revenues


In the analysistable below, we have categorized our portalrevenue by the two main categories included in the consolidated statements of income, with the corresponding percentage change from the prior year period:

2020 vs 20192019 vs 2018
(dollar amounts in thousands)202020192018$ Change%$ Change%
State enterprise revenues$331,720 $290,281 $312,492 $41,439 14 %$(22,211)(7)%
Software & services revenues128,734 63,924 32,408 64,810 101 %31,516 97 %
Total460,454 354,205 344,900 106,249 30 %9,305 %
Recurring revenues as a % of total revenues80%97%96%

State enterprise revenues

In the table below, we have categorized our state enterprise revenues according to the underlying source of revenue, with the corresponding percentage change from the prior year period.period:

        Percent Change
(dollar amounts in thousands) 2018 2017 2016 2018 vs 2017 2017 vs 2016
IGS $203,247
 $192,200
 $174,470
 6 % 10 %
DHR 100,241
 103,899
 105,463
 (4)% (1)%
Software development and services 12,146
 10,180
 11,965
 19 % (15)%
Portal management 4,950
 5,072
 5,100
 (2)% (1)%
Total $320,584
 $311,351
 $296,998
 3 % 5 %
2020 vs 20192019 vs 2018
(dollar amounts in thousands)202020192018$ Change%$ Change%
IGS transaction-based$209,903 $183,987 $195,155 $25,916 14 %$(11,168)(6)%
DHR transaction-based85,337 91,059 100,241 (5,722)(6)%(9,182)(9)%
Development services31,530 10,285 12,146 21,245 207 %(1,861)(15)%
Fixed-fee services4,950 4,950 4,950 — — %— — %
Total$331,720 $290,281 $312,492 $41,439 14 %$(22,211)(7)%


PortalThe following table summarizes key same-state revenue metrics for our state enterprise revenues. The results of the Illinois contract were excluded from the same-state category for all periods presented. For both 2019 and 2018, results of the legacy Texas contract were excluded from the same-state category because they did not generate comparable revenues for two full comparable periods.

202020192018
Same-state IGS revenue growth14 %16 %11 %
Same-state DHR revenue growth (decline)(6)%%%
Same-state revenue growth - other services*136 %%15 %
Same-state revenue growth - total14 %10 %%
* Represents the combined revenue growth from development services and fixed-fee services.

State enterprise revenues for 2020 increased 14% from 2019 driven by same state growth. The 14% increase in same-state revenues for 2020 was mainly due to higher revenues in 2018Virginia, New Jersey and Wisconsin, among other states. Same-state IGS revenues increased 3%, or approximately $9.2 million, over 2017, mainly driven by a 9%14% in 2020 due, in part, to higher DMV-related revenues across several states,


35


including the new motor vehicle titling and registration service in Wisconsin, strong demand for hunting and fishing licensing services in several states and an increase in same state portal revenues and an $8.1 million increase in revenues from our new Texas payment processing contract. These increases were partially offset byrevenues in New Jersey, among other services. In addition, the pandemic and the need to socially distance pushed more businesses and citizens online to interact with governments digitally, instead of in government offices, which increased the usage of many digital services we manage on behalf of our government partners. Same-state DHR revenues declined 6% in 2020 due to lower revenues across several states as a $16.7result of the impact of COVID-19 on the auto insurance industry and associated data resellers. Same-state revenue growth for other services increased 136% in 2020 primarily due to pandemic unemployment services provided in the Commonwealth of Virginia, which totaled $19.6 million for the year.

State enterprise revenues for 2019 declined 7% from 2018, mainly due to a $49.0 million decrease in revenues from the legacy Texas portal contract, which expired on August 31, 2018, andpartially offset by a $1.810%, or $27.3 million, decrease in revenues from the legacy Tennessee portal contract, which expired on March 31, 2017. We currently expect total portal revenues to decline modestly in 2019 due mainly to the transition to the new Texas payment processing contract, which has significantly lower annual revenues than the legacy Texas portal contract. However, we currently expect same state revenues to grow approximately 8-10% in 2019, and combined with the new Texas payment processing contract, which we currently expect will generate approximately $24 million in revenues in 2019, should offset much of the loss in revenues from the legacy Texas portal contract.

The 9% increase in same state portalrevenues. The 10% increase in same-state revenues in 2018for 2019 was mainly due to higher revenues in South Carolina, Colorado,New Jersey, Indiana and Louisiana,Colorado, among other states. Same stateSame-state IGS revenues increased 11%16% in both 20182019 driven in part by higher payment processing volumes in New Jersey and 2017. The increase in 2018 was due toIndiana and higher revenues from the deployment and increased adoption of several key services, including driver's license renewals in South Carolina and motor vehicle and business registrationsrenewals in Colorado, among others. Same stateother services. Same-state DHR revenues grew 3% in 2018 compared to 1% in 2017. The increase in 2018 was2019, mainly due to a price increase in one state and higher volumes across several states. Same state portal software development and

Software & services revenues increased 27% in 2018 mainly due to higher project-based revenues in Indiana, among other states.

Portal revenues in 2017 increased 5%, or approximately $14.4 million, over 2016, mainly driven by a 6% increase in same state portal revenues, a $3.4 million increase in revenues in Louisiana and a $2.4 million increase in revenues in Illinois. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in revenues from legacy Tennessee and Iowa contracts (combined, approximately $7.3 million) due to contract expirations on March 31, 2017 and November 30, 2016, respectively.



33



The 6% increase in same state portal revenues in 2017 was mainly due to higher revenues in Colorado, Texas and South Carolina, among other states. Same state IGS revenues increased 11% in 2017 compared to 12% in 2016. The increase in 2017 was due to higher revenues from the deployment and increased adoption of several key services, including vehicle inspections in Texas and motor vehicle registrations in Colorado, among others. Same state DHR revenues grew 1% in 2017 compared to 2% in 2016. The increase in 2017 was mainly due to higher transaction volumes in Utah, Colorado and Wisconsin, among other states. Same state portal software development and services revenues decreased 29% in 2017 mainly due to lower project-based revenues from in Wisconsin and Indiana, among other states. This decline was partially offset by a $2.4 million increase in revenues from Illinois.

Cost of Portal Revenues


In the analysis below, we have categorized our software & services revenues among Payments, Federal, TourHealth and Other, with the corresponding percentage change from the prior year period.
2020 vs 20192019 vs 2018
(dollar amounts in thousands)202020192018$ Change%$ Change%
Payments$41,092 $37,976 $10,936 $3,116 8%$27,040 247%
Federal20,799 22,019 19,813 (1,220)(6)%2,206 11%
TourHealth61,634 — — 61,634 N/A— N/A
Other5,209 3,929 1,659 1,280 33%2,270 137%
Total$128,734 $63,924 $32,408 $64,810 101%$31,516 97%

Software & services revenues in 2020 increased $64.8 million, or 101%, over 2019, primarily driven by $61.6 million in revenues from our TourHealth COVID-19 testing solution, which commenced in August 2020, and provided testing services to the states of Florida, South Carolina and Kansas as well as the Alabama Department of Corrections and the University of Mississippi. The increase in software & services revenues was also driven by higher volumes in our Payments business, primarily in the state of Texas. Federal revenues decreased 6% in 2020 driven mainly by a 13% decline in revenues from our contract with the FMCSA to operate the PSP resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, partially offset by a 45% increase in revenues from Recreation.gov as many federal parks reopened and experienced an influx of visitors after stay-at-home orders instituted in the early months of the pandemic were lifted starting in June 2020.

Software & services revenues in 2019 increased $31.5 million, or 97%, over 2018, primarily driven by our new Texas payments business, which commenced on September 1, 2018. The increase was also driven by Recreation.gov, which launched on October 1, 2018, and higher volumes from the PSP service. Other software & services revenues increased mainly due to our acquired RxGov prescription drug monitoring solution (acquired in 2018) and licensing solutions business (acquired in 2019).

State Enterprise Cost of Revenues

In the table below, we have categorized our state enterprise cost of portal revenues between fixed and variable costs, with the corresponding percentage change from the prior year period:

Fixed costs include costs such as employee compensation and benefits (including stock-based compensation), subcontractor labor costs, telecommunications, provision for losses on accounts receivable, and all other costs associated with the provision of dedicated client service such as dedicated facilities.

Variable costs consist of costs that vary with our level of portal revenues and primarily include interchange fees required to process credit/debit card and automated clearinghouse transactions and, to a lesser extent, costs associated with revenue share arrangements with our state partners. A significant percentage of our IGS revenues are generated from online applications whereby users pay for information or transactions via credit/debit cards. We typically earn a portion of the credit/debit card transaction amount, but also must pay an associated interchange fee to the financial institution that processes the credit/debit card transaction. We earn a lower incremental gross profit percentage on these transactions as compared to our DHR and other IGS transactions. However, we plan to continue to implement these services as they contribute favorably to our operating income growth.


36


       Percent Change2020 vs 20192019 vs 2018
(dollar amounts in thousands) 2018 2017 2016 2018 vs 2017 2017 vs 2016(dollar amounts in thousands)202020192018$ Change%$ Change%
Fixed costs $108,891
 $112,040
 $109,670
 (3)% 2%Fixed costs$115,802 $98,754 $108,229 $17,048 17 %$(9,475)(9)%
Variable costs 86,098
 79,532
 70,617
 8 % 13%Variable costs84,099 76,736 79,092 7,363 10 %(2,356)(3)%
Total $194,989
 $191,572
 $180,287
 2 % 6%Total$199,901 $175,490 $187,321 $24,411 14 %$(11,831)(6)%


Cost of portalstate enterprise revenues in 20182020 increased 2%$24.4 million, or 14%, or approximately $3.4 million, over 20172019 due mainly to a 7%15% or approximately $13.4$24.9 million, increase in same state costs. The increase in same state costs in 2020 was primarily attributable to an increase in fixed costs in Virginia for call center subcontractors to support pandemic unemployment services totaling $14.6 million. Variable costs to process credit/debit card transactions also increased, due mainly to higher IGS transaction volumes in several states, as further discussed above.

Cost of portalstate enterprise revenues in 2019 decreased $11.8 million, or 6%, from 2018 from our new Texas payment processing contract and Illinois contract increased $6.2 million combined over 2017. These increases were offset bydue mainly to a year-over-year decrease in costs from the legacy Texas and Tennessee portal contractscontract totaling $31.0 million. This decrease was partially offset by a combined $16.2 million.

The increase in same state cost of portal revenues in 2018 was primarily attributable to an increase in variable costs to process credit/debit card transactions, due mainly to higher IGS transaction volumes, as further discussed above.

Cost of portal revenues in 2017 increased 6%,12% or approximately $11.3 million, over 2016 due mainly to a 7% or approximately $12.2$18.4 million, increase in same state costs. Cost in 2017 from our Louisiana and Illinois contracts increased a combined $3.0 million over 2016. These increases were offset by a decrease in costs from the legacy Tennessee and Iowa contracts totaling $4.5 million.

The increase in same state cost of portal revenues in 2017 was primarily attributable to an increase in variable costs to process credit/debit card transactions, due mainly to higher IGS transaction volumes, as further discussed above, and, to a lesser extent, an increase in employee compensation and benefit costs.


Our portalstate enterprise gross profit percentage was 39% for 2018 compared to 38% for 2017 and 39% for 2016.40% in all periods presented. We carefully monitor our portalstate enterprise gross profit percentage to strike the balance between generating a solid return for our stockholders and delivering



34


value to our government partners through ongoing investment in our portalstate enterprise operations (which we believe also benefits our stockholders). We currently expect our portal gross profit percentage to decline modestly in 2019, due mainly to the transition to the new Texas payment processing contract, which has significantly lower revenues and profit margins than the legacy Texas portal contract.


Software and Services RevenueCost of Revenues


In the analysistable below, we have categorized our software & services cost of revenues by business,between fixed and variable costs, with the corresponding percentage change from the prior year period.period:

        Percent Change
(dollar amounts in thousands) 2018 2017 2016 2018 vs 2017 2017 vs 2016
NIC Federal $17,433
 $18,425
 $14,156
 (5)% 30 %
Other 6,883
 6,732
 6,761
 2 %  %
Total $24,316
 $25,157
 $20,917
 (3)% 20 %


2020 vs 20192019 vs 2018
(dollar amounts in thousands)202020192018$ Change%$ Change%
Fixed costs$64,587 $13,169 $8,161 $51,418 390 %$5,008 61 %
Variable costs30,246 28,467 8,550 1,779 %19,917 233 %
Total$94,833 $41,636 $16,711 $53,197 128 %$24,925 149 %
Software & services revenues in 2018 decreased 3%, or approximately $0.8 million, over 2017. This decrease was primarily driven by a nonrecurring $2.8 million spike in 2017 revenues from our YourPassNow electronic park pass service for the Senior Park Pass program with the United States National Park Service. Demand for the lifetime Senior Pass increased significantly in July and August of 2017 due to a then pending legislative price increase that became effective August 28, 2017. This decrease was partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in revenues from our contract with the FMSCA because of increased adoption of the PSP. Software & services revenues in 2017 increased 20%, or approximately $4.2 million, over 2016, driven largely by revenues from YourPassNow as further described above. We also experienced higher revenues from our contract with the FMCSA in 2017 ($0.8 million increase) because of increased adoption of the PSP.

Cost of Software and Services Revenues


Cost of software & services revenues in 2018 and 20172020 increased 2% and 49%,128% or approximately $0.2$53.2 million, and $2.9 million, respectively, over the corresponding prior year periods.2019, driven primarily by higher fixed costs for subcontractors to support our TourHealth COVID-19 testing solution totaling $51.6 million. The increase in 2018 was primarily driven by higher NIC Federal employee compensation and benefitvariable costs relatedis attributable to start-up costscredit/debit card interchange fees associated with subcontracting work for Booz Allen Hamilton on its Recreation.gov contract. The new Recreation.gov service launched on October 1, 2018. This increase was partially offset by higher prior year costs ($1.2 million) to support the non-recurring spikepayment processing volumes in YourPassNow volumes from the Senior Park Pass program, as described above.Texas.


Our software & services gross profit percentage was 63%26% in 2018 and 65%2020, compared to 35% in 2017 and 72% in 2016.2019. The lower gross profit percentage in 2020 was primarily driven by lower gross profit margins from our TourHealth COVID-19 testing solution.

Cost of software & services revenues in 2019 increased 149% or approximately $24.9 million, over 2018, driven primarily by higher variable costs to support our Texas payment operations, which commenced on September 1, 2018. The increase in fixed costs was mainly dueprimarily attributable to start-uphigher costs associated with subcontracting workto support our recently acquired RxGov and NIC Licensing Solutions businesses.

Our software & services gross profit percentage was 35% in 2019 compared to 48% in 2018. The lower gross profit percentage in 2019 was primarily driven by lower gross profit margins for Booz Allen Hamilton on its Recreation.gov contract as further discussed above.our Texas payments business.




37


Selling & Administrative


Selling & administrative expenses for 2020 were $34.6 million, a 2% decrease from 2019, primarily driven by executive severance costs in 2019 totaling $2.6 million, which consisted of a one-time cash payment of $1.5 million and $1.1 million of stock-based compensation expense associated with the accelerated vesting of certain restricted stock awards, as previously disclosed, and was partially offset by an increase in incentive-based compensation due to strong consolidated financial results in 2020. As a percentage of total consolidated revenues, selling & administrative expenses were 16%8% in 20182020 compared to 15%10% in both 2017 and 2016. In 2018 and 2017,2019.

Selling & administrative expenses for 2019 were $35.2 million, a 7% increase over 2018. As a percentage of total consolidated revenues, selling & administrative expenses increased 12% and 8%, or approximately $5.9to 10% in 2019 compared to 9% in 2018, primarily driven by executive severance costs in 2019, as described above.

Enterprise Technology & Product Support

Enterprise technology & product support expenses were $29.5 million, and $3.7 million, respectively,a 10% increase over their corresponding prior year periods. These increases were mainly2019, primarily driven by higher personnel costs to support businessSaaS product development and enhance company-wide information technology. As a percentage of total consolidated revenues, enterprise technology including the continued development& product support expenses were 6% in 2020 compared to 8% in 2019.

Enterprise technology & product support expenses for 2019 were $26.9 million, a 12% increase over 2018. As a percentage of the Company's citizen-centric Gov2Go®total consolidated revenues, enterprise platform and enterprise microservices platform, andtechnology & product support expenses were 8% in 2019 compared to 7% in 2018, primarily driven by higher incentive-based compensation.personnel costs to support SaaS product development and enhance company-wide information technology.




35



Depreciation & Amortization


2020 vs 20192019 vs 2018
(dollar amounts in thousands)202020192018$ Change%$ Change%
Depreciation expense$4,103 $4,336 $5,372 $(233)(5)%$(1,036)(19)%
Amortization expense10,142 8,274 3,745 1,868 23 %4,529 121 %
Total$14,245 $12,610 $9,117 $1,635 13 %$3,493 38 %

Depreciation & amortization expense in 2020 increased 32%13%, or approximately $2.2$1.6 million, in 2018, over 2017,2019, driven primarily by intangible asset amortization related to the Complia, LLC business acquisition in May 2019 (renamed NIC Licensing Solutions), as well as amortization of capitalized software development costs related to ongoing investmentsSaaS enterprise product and vertical platform investments.

Depreciation & amortization expense in enterprise platform solutions2019 increased 38%, or approximately $3.5 million, over 2018, driven primarily by approximately $3.0 million of intangible asset amortization related to the Leap Orbit technology acquisition (renamed RxGov) and the Complia, LLC acquisition, compared to approximately $0.5 million of intangible asset amortization related to the Leap Orbit asset acquisition in 2018. SeeThe increase in amortization expense in 2019 was also driven by an increase in capitalized software development costs related to SaaS enterprise product and vertical platform investments. This increase was partially offset by lower depreciation related to the legacy Texas contract.



38


Interest Income

Interest income declined in 2020 compared to 2019 due to a decrease in interest earned on our investable cash balances following the Federal Reserve's emergency cuts to the federal funds rate to essentially zero in March 2020 in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Interest income was $2.5 million in 2019, up from $0.6 million in 2018, driven by an increase in interest rates on our investable cash balances during the period.

Income Taxes

In 2020, 2019 and 2018, our effective tax rate was approximately 21.9%, 22.3% and 23.0%, respectively. The lower effective tax rate in 2020 was primarily due to lower non-deductible expenses and a lower blended state income tax rate, which was impacted by our operations in the state of Florida for TourHealth COVID-19 testing services allowing us to utilize certain of our net operating loss carryforwards. The lower tax rate in 2019 is primarily attributable to the release of reserves for unrecognized income tax benefits resulting from the expiration of statutes of limitations for certain tax years and from the completion of an IRS examination of our 2016 federal income tax return, which resulted in no changes to our previously filed return. For additional information, see Note 11, Income Taxes, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating activities

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $62.8 million, $72.1 million and $69.8 million in 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The changes in net cash provided by operating activities were the result of fluctuations in working capital associated with the timing of payments to and receipts from our government partners, subcontractors and end-user consumers. In 2020, these fluctuations included TourHealth COVID-19 testing services, which commenced in August 2020 and, to a lesser extent, pandemic unemployment services provided to the Commonwealth of Virginia..

Investing activities

Investing activities in 2020, 2019 and 2018 were $11.8 million, $26.4 million and $17.5 million, respectively. The change reflects the cash paid for the Complia and Leap Orbit acquisitions in 2019, totaling $13.5 million. For additional information see Note 5, Asset Acquisition, and Note 6, Intangible Assets, Net,Acquisitions, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We currently expect to pay the additional consideration of $3.5 million for the Leap Orbit acquisition in the first half of 2019 and expect the associated intangible asset amortization to approximate $2.4 million for fiscal year 2019.

Income Taxes

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law.  The Tax Act, among other changes, reduced the statutory federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. We received the benefit of the reduced statutory federal corporate income tax rate starting January 1, 2018, which was partially offset by changes in certain deductions.

Our effective tax rate was approximately 23% in 2018 compared to 34% in 2017 and 28% in 2016. The lower tax rate in 2018 is primarily attributable to the passage of the Tax Act, as described above, partially offset by the repeal of the domestic production activities deduction.

Our effective tax rate in 2018 was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate due mainly to state income taxes, uncertain tax positions, and nondeductible expenses, partially offset by favorable benefits related to the federal research and development credit.

Our effective tax rate in 2017 was lower than the statutory federal income tax rate for 2017 due mainly to favorable benefits related to the domestic production activities deduction, the federal research and development credit, and excess tax benefits from restricted stock vestings.

Our lower effective tax rate in 2016 was due mainly to favorable benefits related to the domestic production activities deduction, the federal research and development credit and an adjustment to certain deferred tax liabilities related to a previous acquisition of a business.

For additional information, see Note 11, Income Taxes, to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Operating activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $69.8 million in 2018 compared to $64.8 million in 2017. The increase in 2018 was primarily driven by an increase in net income, partially offset by the timing of payments to our government partners.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $64.8 million in 2017 compared to $81.2 million in 2016. The decrease in 2017 was mainly the result of the timing of collections for accounts receivable, partially offset by the timing of payments to our government partners.

Investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was $17.5 million, $8.3 million and $8.2 million, respectively. Investing activities in 2018, 2017 and 2016 primarily consisted of $5.4 million, $4.8 million and $5.6 million, respectively, of capital expenditures, which were for fixed asset additions in our outsourced portal businesses and in our centralized operations to support and enhance corporate-wide information technology and security infrastructure, including Web servers, purchased software and office equipment.




36



Furthermore, in 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, we capitalized $8.6$8.5 million, $3.6$8.7 million and $2.6$8.6 million, respectively, of software development costs primarily related to ongoing investments in enterprise SaaS platform solutions and in the enhancement of our centrally managed applications for customer management, billing and payment processing that support our business operations and accounting systems.

Investing activities in 2020, 2019 and 2018 also reflect $3.6consisted of $3.4 million, $4.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively, of capital expenditures, which were for fixed asset additions in cash paid for the Leap Orbit asset acquisition. For additionalour state enterprise businesses and in our centralized operations to support and enhance corporate-wide information see Note 5, Asset Acquisition, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.technology and security infrastructure, including Web servers, purchased software and office equipment.


Financing activities


Net cash used in financing activities in 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 primarily reflects $21.5 million, $21.4 million and $43.3 million, respectively, of cash dividends paid to stockholders.stockholders totaling $24.4 million, $21.6 million and $21.5 million, respectively. The increase in 2020 was primarily due to the repurchase of shares in the first quarter of 2020 totaling $3.9 million and to a $2.8 million an increase in dividend payments.


Liquidity


We recognize revenues primarily from providing outsourced digital government services net of the transaction fees due to the government when the services are provided. We recognize accounts receivable at the time these services are


39


provided and accrue the related fees that we must remit to the government as accounts payable at such time. As a result, trade accounts receivable and accounts payable reflect the gross amounts outstanding at the balance sheet dates. We typically collect most of our accounts receivable prior to remitting amounts payable to our government partners.


We believe our working capital and current ratio are important measures of our short-term liquidity. Working capital, defined as current assets minus current liabilities, increased to $197.2$257.6 million at December 31, 2018,2020, from $158.5$212.1 million at December 31, 2017.2019. The increase was primarily due to cash generated from operating activities and the timing of paymentsan increase in accounts receivable from our government partners and end-user consumers driven by higher revenues in 2020, including TourHealth COVID-19 testing services and Virginia pandemic unemployment services, offset by an increase in accounts payable to our government partners.partners and an increase in accrued expenses for amounts owed to subcontractors. Our current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, was 3.22.6 at December 31, 20182020 compared to 2.33.1 at December 31, 2017.2019.


As of December 31, 2018,2020, our unrestricted cash balance was $191.7$236.5 million compared to $160.8$214.4 million at December 31, 2017.2019. We believe that our currently available liquid resources and cash generated from operations in the future will be sufficient to meet our operating requirements, capital expenditure requirements and dividend payments for at least the next 12 months without the need for additional capital. We have a $10 million unsecured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Agreement”) with a bank that is available to finance working capital, issue letters of credit and finance general corporate purposes. The Credit Agreement also includes an accordion feature that will allowallows us to increase the available capacity under the Credit Agreement to $50 million, subject to securing additional commitments from the bank. We can obtain letters of credit in an aggregate amount of $5 million, which reduces the maximum amount available for borrowing under the Credit Agreement. In total, we had $4.8 million in available capacity to issue additional letters of credit and $9.8 million of unused borrowing capacity at December 31, 20182020 under the Credit Agreement. We were in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the Credit Agreement at December 31, 2018.2020. For further discussion, see Note 8, Debt Obligations and Collateral Requirements, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


At December 31, 2018,2020, we were bound by performance bond commitments totaling approximately $5.8$38.2 million on certain outsourced government portal contracts.state enterprise contracts and other business relationships. We have never had any defaults resulting in draws on performance bonds.


We currently expect our capital expenditures to range from $4.0 million to $5.0 million in fiscal year 2019,2021, which we intend to fund from our cash flows from operations and existing cash reserves. This estimate includes capital expenditures for normal fixed asset additions in our outsourced portalstate enterprise and software & services businesses including equipment upgrades and enhancements, and in our centralized operations to support and enhance corporate-wide information technology and security infrastructure, including Web servers, purchased software, and office equipment. We currently expect our capitalized internal-use software development costs to range from $7.0$9.0 million to $8.0$10.0 million. This estimate includes costs related to ongoing investments in enterprise SaaS platform solutions and the enhancement of centrally managed applications for customer management, billing and payment processing that support our business operations and accounting systems.


Acquisitions

On May 1, 2019, we completed the stock acquisition of Complia, a regulatory licensing platform business. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the selling shareholders received purchase consideration of $10.0 million in cash and are eligible to receive additional consideration of up to $5.0 million. See Note 5, Acquisition, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Dividends

We paid dividends of $0.32, $0.32 and $0.65$0.36 per common share ($0.09 per quarter) in 2018, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.$0.32 per common share ($0.08 per quarter) in each of 2019 and 2018. The total cash paid for dividends in 2020, 2019 and 2018 2017was $24.4 million, $21.6 million and 2016 was $21.5 million, $21.4 million and $43.3 million, respectively.







3740



On January 28, 2019,February 1, 2021, our Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.08$0.09 per share, payable to stockholders of record as of March 5, 2019.3, 2021. The dividend will be paid on March 17, 2021 out of our available cash. Our ability to pay dividends could be affected by future business performance, liquidity, capital needs, alternative investment opportunities and debt covenants associated with our line of credit. We do not believe any of our previously paid or declared dividends will have a significant effect on our future liquidity needs.


Share Repurchase

In March 2018, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program allowing us to repurchase up to $25 million of common stock. During March 2020, we purchased an aggregate of 241,180 shares under the repurchase program at a weighted average purchase price of $16.33 for a total value of $3.9 million. The remaining $21.1 million of value authorized under the repurchase program remains available for share repurchases.

Future Financing

We may need to raise additional capital within the next 12 months to further:


fund operations if unforeseen costs arise;
support our expansion into other federal, state and local government agencies beyond what is contemplated if unforeseen opportunities arise;
expand our product and service offerings beyond what is contemplated if unforeseen opportunities arise;
fund acquisitions;
respond to unforeseen competitive pressures; and
acquire technologies beyond what is contemplated.


Any projections of future earnings and cash flows are subject to substantial uncertainty. If our cash generated from operations and the unused portion of our line of credit are insufficient to satisfy our liquidity requirements, we may seek to sell additional equity securities or issue debt securities. If we need to obtain new debt or equity financing in the future, the terms and availability of such financing may be impacted by economic and financial market conditions, as well as our financial condition and results of operations at the time we seek additional financing. The sale of additional equity securities could result in dilution to our stockholders. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to us, if at all.


Off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations


The following table sets forth our future contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 20182020 (in thousands):

Payments Due by Period
Contractual ObligationsTotalLess than 1
Year
1-3 Years3-5 YearsMore than
5 Years
Operating lease obligations$12,437 $4,692 $5,711 $2,034 $— 
Income tax uncertainties4,358 — 4,358 — — 
Total contractual cash obligations$16,795 $4,692 $10,069 $2,034 $— 
    Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations Total 
Less than 1
Year
 1-3 Years 3-5 Years 
More than
5 Years
Operating lease obligations $14,150
 $4,673
 $6,007
 $2,780
 $690
Income tax uncertainties 8,651
 
 8,651
 
 
Total contractual cash obligations $22,801
 $4,673
 $14,658
 $2,780
 $690


While we have significant operating lease commitments for office space, except for our headquarters, those commitments are generally tied to the period of performance under related government contracts.


We have income tax uncertainties of approximately $8.7$4.4 million at December 31, 2018.2020. These obligations are classified as noncurrent on our consolidated balance sheet, as resolution is expected to take more than a year. We estimate that these matters could be resolved in one to three years as reflected in the table above. However, the ultimate timing of


41


resolution is uncertain. For additional information see Note 11, Income Taxes, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


As previously discussed, we currently expect to pay the additional deferred consideration of $3.5 million for the Leap Orbit acquisition in the first half of 2019 and expect the associated intangible asset amortization to approximate $2.4 million for fiscal year 2019.




38


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Interest Rate Risk


Our results of operations are exposed to financial market risks due primarily to changes in interest rates and earnings credit rates on our cash accounts with commercial banks. COVID-19 has negatively affected the economic conditions in the United States and resulted in the Federal Reserve lowering interest rates to near zero, which has reduced the interest income we earn on our interest-investable cash and increased the amount of fees we pay for commercial banking services. Any reduction in the earnings credit rate set by our commercial banking partners, which a bank calculates on non-interest bearing accounts. customer deposits and uses to offset service charges, could further increase fees we pay for commercial banking services.

We currently have no principal amounts of indebtedness outstanding under our line of credit, the terms of which are discussed in Note 8 to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


Changes in interest rates affect the interest income and earnings credit rates we earn on our cash accounts with banks, and therefore impact our cash flows and results of operations. Based on our investable cash balances as of December 31, 2018,2020, a one percent change in interest rates would not have a significant impact on our cash flows or results of operations.


We do not use derivative financial instruments.







3942

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of NIC Inc. and Subsidiaries


Opinion on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting

We have audited NIC Inc. and Subsidiaries’’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, NIC Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2020, and the related notes and our report dated February 21, 201925, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


Kansas City, Missouri
February 21, 2019

25, 2021




4043





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To theThe Stockholders and the Board of Directors of NIC Inc. and Subsidiaries


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NIC Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders'stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 21, 201925, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.




44



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Description of the Matter
Revenue Processed By Highly Automated Proprietary Applications

As more fully described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, approximately 78 percent of the Company’s revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020 are derived from its transaction-based services where the Company agrees to provide continuous access to digital government services that allow consumers to complete secure transactions in exchange for transaction-based fees. The Company satisfies its performance obligation by providing customers access to applications over the contractual term and by processing transactions as they are initiated by consumers. The Company’s transaction-based services are comprised of a significant volume of low-dollar transactions processed by proprietary applications that were primarily developed by the Company. The processing of transactions, including the recording of them, is highly automated and based on contractual terms with the Company’s customers.

Given the highly automated applications utilized to process and record transaction-based revenue, auditing those transactions required a significant extent of effort and increased involvement of professionals with expertise in information technology (“IT”) necessary for us to identify, test, and evaluate the Company’s significant applications and automated controls utilized to process transaction-based revenue.
How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design, and tested the operating effectiveness of the Company’s accounting for transaction-based revenue. This included involvement of audit professionals with significant experience in the use of information technology (IT) to support business operations and related controls. With the involvement of our IT professionals, we identified the relevant applications used to calculate and record transaction-based revenue, and tested the IT general controls over those applications, including testing of user access controls, change management controls, and IT operations controls as well as certain automated application controls.

Our audit procedures related to the Company’s transaction-based revenue also included, among other procedures, performing data analytical procedures to evaluate the completeness and accuracy of recorded revenue and testing disaggregated reconciliations of revenue from the significant applications to the Company’s general ledger.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015
Kansas City, Missouri
February 21, 2019

25, 2021




4145

NIC INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except par value amount)


December 31,
20202019
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash$236,513 $214,380 
Trade accounts receivable, net155,484 85,399 
Prepaid expenses & other current assets23,638 12,944 
Total current assets415,635 312,723 
Property and equipment, net9,341 10,091 
Right of use lease assets, net10,809 10,778 
Intangible assets, net20,737 22,398 
Goodwill5,965 5,965 
Other assets1,862 404 
Total assets$464,349 $362,359 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$82,364 $63,685 
Accrued expenses61,064 25,940 
Lease liabilities4,078 3,776 
Other current liabilities10,491 7,191 
Total current liabilities157,997 100,592 
Deferred income taxes, net1,097 2,463 
Lease liabilities7,172 7,373 
Other long-term liabilities4,934 6,003 
Total liabilities171,200 116,431 
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, 0.0001 par, 200,000 shares authorized, 67,031 and 66,968 shares issued and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital129,456 123,208 
Retained earnings163,686 122,713 
Total stockholders' equity293,149 245,928 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$464,349 $362,359 
 December 31,
 2018 2017
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Cash$191,700
 $160,777
Trade accounts receivable, net80,904
 103,938
Prepaid expenses & other current assets13,730
 12,843
Total current assets286,334
 277,558
Property and equipment, net10,256
 10,306
Intangible assets, net13,604
 5,214
Deferred income taxes, net
 667
Other assets332
 1,986
Total assets$310,526
 $295,731
    
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$60,092
 $88,920
Accrued expenses24,150
 26,501
Other current liabilities4,883
 3,673
Total current liabilities89,125
 119,094
    
Deferred income taxes, net781
 
Other long-term liabilities8,931
 8,395
Total liabilities98,837
 127,489
    
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 2, 3, 8, 9 and 11)
 
    
Stockholders' equity:   
Common stock, $0.0001 par, 200,000 shares authorized, 66,569 and 66,271 shares issued and outstanding7
 7
Additional paid-in capital117,763
 111,275
Retained earnings93,919
 56,960
Total stockholders' equity211,689
 168,242
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity$310,526
 $295,731



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4246

NIC INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except per share amount)


Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Revenues:
State enterprise revenues$331,720 $290,281 $312,492 
Software & services revenues128,734 63,924 32,408 
Total revenues460,454 354,205 344,900 
Operating expenses:
State enterprise cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization199,901 175,490 187,321 
Software & services cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization94,833 41,636 16,711 
Selling & administrative34,551 35,200 32,747 
Enterprise technology & product support29,491 26,850 23,944 
Depreciation & amortization14,245 12,610 9,117 
Total operating expenses373,021 291,786 269,840 
Operating income87,433 62,419 75,060 
Other income:
Interest income389 2,514 616 
Income before income taxes87,822 64,933 75,676 
Income tax provision19,228 14,503 17,407 
Net income$68,594 $50,430 $58,269 
Basic net income per share$1.01 $0.75 $0.87 
Diluted net income per share$1.01 $0.75 $0.87 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic67,010 66,884 66,499 
Diluted67,117 66,884 66,560 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Revenues:     
Portal revenues$320,584
 $311,351
 $296,998
Software & services revenues24,316
 25,157
 20,917
Total revenues344,900
 336,508
 317,915
Operating expenses:     
Cost of portal revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization194,989
 191,572
 180,287
Cost of software & services revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization9,043
 8,890
 5,958
Selling & administrative56,691
 50,780
 47,063
Depreciation & amortization9,117
 6,929
 6,749
Total operating expenses269,840
 258,171
 240,057
Operating income75,060
 78,337
 77,858
Other income:     
Interest income616
 
 
Income before income taxes75,676
 78,337
 77,858
Income tax provision17,407
 26,723
 22,025
Net income$58,269
 $51,614
 $55,833
      
Basic net income per share$0.87
 $0.77
 $0.84
Diluted net income per share$0.87
 $0.77
 $0.84
      
Weighted average shares outstanding:     
Basic66,499
 66,209
 65,913
Diluted66,560
 66,266
 65,966



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4347

NIC INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(in thousands)


Common StockAdditional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
SharesAmountTotal
Balance, January 1, 201866,271 $$111,275 $56,960 $168,242 
Cumulative effect of adoption of accounting standard (Note 2)
— — — 208 208 
Net income— — — 58,269 58,269 
Dividends declared— — — (21,521)(21,521)
Dividend equivalents on unvested performance-based restricted stock awards— — 137 (137)
Dividend equivalents canceled upon forfeiture of performance-based restricted stock awards— — (140)140 
Restricted stock vestings263 — — — — 
Shares surrendered and canceled upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholdings(87)— (1,229)— (1,229)
Stock-based compensation— — 6,338 — 6,338 
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan122 — 1,382 — 1,382 
Balance, December 31, 201866,569 117,763 93,919 211,689 
Net income— — — 50,430 50,430 
Dividends declared— — — (21,649)(21,649)
Dividend equivalents on unvested performance-based restricted stock awards— — 109 (109)
Dividend equivalents canceled upon forfeiture of performance-based restricted stock awards— — (122)122 
Restricted stock vestings427 — — — — 
Shares surrendered and canceled upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholdings(159)— (2,754)— (2,754)
Stock-based compensation— — 6,769 — 6,769 
Shares issuable in lieu of dividend payments on performance-based restricted stock awards— — — — 
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan128 — 1,443 — 1,443 
Balance, December 31, 201966,968 123,208 122,713 245,928 
Cumulative effect of adoption of accounting standard (Note 2)
— — — 339 339 
Net income— — — 68,594 68,594 
Dividends declared— — — (24,398)(24,398)
Dividend equivalents on unvested performance-based restricted stock awards— — 141 (141)
Dividend equivalents canceled upon forfeiture of performance-based restricted stock awards— — (84)84 
Restricted stock vestings299 — — — — 
Shares surrendered and canceled upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholdings(99)— (2,037)— (2,037)
Repurchase of shares(241)— (439)(3,505)(3,944)
Stock-based compensation— — 7,158 — 7,158 
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan104 — 1,509 — 1,509 
Balance, December 31, 202067,031 $$129,456 $163,686 $293,149 
 Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
  
 Shares Amount   Total
Balance, January 1, 201665,637
 $7
 $100,929
 $14,870
 $115,806
Net income
 
 
 55,833
 55,833
Dividends declared
 
 
 (43,301) (43,301)
Dividend equivalents on unvested performance-based restricted stock awards
 
 
 (202) (202)
Dividend equivalents canceled upon forfeiture of performance-based restricted stock awards
 
 
 27
 27
Restricted stock vestings390
 
 136
 
 136
Shares surrendered and canceled upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholdings(120) 
 (2,137) 
 (2,137)
Stock-based compensation
 
 5,997
 
 5,997
Excess tax deductions relating to stock-based compensation
 
 590
 
 590
Shares issuable in lieu of dividend payments on performance-based restricted stock awards
 
 40
 
 40
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan75
 
 1,114
 
 1,114
Balance, December 31, 201665,982
 7
 106,669
 27,227
 133,903
Cumulative effect of adoption of accounting standard (Note 2)    409
 (409)  
Net income
 
 
 51,614
 51,614
Dividends declared
 
 
 (21,393) (21,393)
Dividend equivalents on unvested performance-based restricted stock awards
 
 110
 (110) 
Dividend equivalents canceled upon forfeiture of performance-based restricted stock awards
 
 (31) 31
 
Restricted stock vestings319
 
 
 
 
Shares surrendered and canceled upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholdings(122) 
 (2,676) 
 (2,676)
Stock-based compensation
 
 5,464
 
 5,464
Shares issuable in lieu of dividend payments on performance-based restricted stock awards5
 
 
 
 
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan87
 
 1,330
 
 1,330
Balance, December 31, 201766,271
 7
 111,275
 56,960
 168,242
Cumulative effect of adoption of accounting standard (Note 2)
 
 
 208
 208
Net income
 
 
 58,269
 58,269
Dividends declared
 
 
 (21,521) (21,521)
Dividend equivalents on unvested performance-based restricted stock awards
 
 137
 (137) 
Dividend equivalents canceled upon forfeiture of performance-based restricted stock awards
 
 (140) 140
 
Restricted stock vestings263
 
 
 
 
Shares surrendered and canceled upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholdings(87) 
 (1,229) 
 (1,229)
Stock-based compensation
 
 6,338
 
 6,338
Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan122
 
 1,382
 
 1,382
Balance, December 31, 201866,569
 $7
 $117,763
 $93,919
 $211,689



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4448

NIC INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)


Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$68,594 $50,430 $58,269 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation & amortization14,245 12,610 9,117 
Stock-based compensation expense7,158 6,769 6,338 
Deferred income taxes(1,483)1,682 1,448 
Provision for losses on accounts receivable1,505 782 852 
Loss on disposal of property and equipment89 88 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable, net(71,134)(4,826)22,182 
Prepaid expenses & other current assets(10,694)789 (887)
Other assets2,940 4,430 1,810 
Accounts payable18,679 3,593 (28,828)
Accrued expenses35,124 1,788 (2,351)
Other current liabilities2,084 1,132 1,262 
Other long-term liabilities(4,181)(7,218)536 
Net cash provided by operating activities62,837 72,050 69,836 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment(3,354)(4,253)(5,410)
Capitalized software development costs(8,481)(8,671)(8,580)
Business combination(10,000)
Asset acquisition(3,486)(3,555)
Net cash used in investing activities(11,835)(26,410)(17,545)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash dividends on common stock(24,398)(21,649)(21,521)
Proceeds from employee common stock purchases1,509 1,443 1,382 
Shares surrendered upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy tax withholdings(2,036)(2,754)(1,229)
Repurchase of shares(3,944)
Net cash used in financing activities(28,869)(22,960)(21,368)
Net increase in cash22,133 22,680 30,923 
Cash, beginning of period214,380 191,700 160,777 
Cash, end of period$236,513 $214,380 $191,700 
Supplemental cash flow information:
Non-cash activities:
Contingent consideration - business combination$$960 $
Cash payments:
Income taxes paid, net of refunds$19,649 $16,035 $13,707 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$58,269
 $51,614
 $55,833
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation & amortization9,117
 6,929
 6,749
Stock-based compensation expense6,338
 5,464
 5,997
Deferred income taxes1,448
 1,640
 (886)
Provision for losses on accounts receivable852
 552
 142
Loss on disposal of property and equipment88
 49
 24
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation
 
 590
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:     
Trade accounts receivable, net22,182
 (21,769) (2,501)
Prepaid expenses & other current assets(887) 2,191
 (2,449)
Other assets1,810
 (1,509) (51)
Accounts payable(28,828) 15,669
 12,119
Accrued expenses(2,351) 2,251
 2,136
Other current liabilities1,262
 522
 553
Other long-term liabilities536
 1,233
 2,903
Net cash provided by operating activities69,836
 64,836
 81,159
      
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Purchases of property and equipment(5,410) (4,771) (5,646)
Asset acquisition(3,555) 
 
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
 7
 8
Capitalized software development costs(8,580) (3,565) (2,576)
Net cash used in investing activities(17,545) (8,329) (8,214)
      
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Cash dividends on common stock(21,521) (21,393) (43,301)
Proceeds from employee common stock purchases1,382
 1,330
 1,114
Tax withholdings related to stock-based compensation awards(1,229) (2,676) (2,137)
Net cash used in financing activities(21,368) (22,739) (44,324)
      
Net increase in cash30,923
 33,768
 28,621
Cash, beginning of period160,777
 127,009
 98,388
Cash, end of period$191,700
 $160,777
 $127,009
      
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Non-cash investing activities:     
Capital expenditures accrued but not yet paid$
 $855
 $273
Cash payments:     
Income taxes paid, net of refunds$13,707
 $21,303
 $19,847
Cash dividends on common stock previously restricted for payment of dividend$
 $
 $36,456



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


4549

NIC INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



1. THE COMPANY


NIC Inc. (the “Company” or “NIC”) is a leading provider of digital government services and payment solutions that help governments use technology to provide a higher level of service to businesses and citizens and increase efficiencies. The Company accomplishes this currently through two2 channels: its primary outsourced portalstate enterprise businesses and its software & services businesses.


In its primary outsourced portalthe Company's state enterprise businesses, the Companyit generally provides services to design, build, and operate internet-based applicationsdigital government services on an enterprise-wide basis on behalf of state and local governments desiring to enableprovide access to government information and to complete secure government-based transactions through multiple online channels, including mobile devices.channels. These portalsdigital government services consist of internet-basedwebsites and applications the Company has built that allow end-user consumers, such as businesses and citizens, to access government information online, and complete transactions, such as applying for a permit, retrieving government records, or filing a government-mandated form or report. Operating under multiple-year contracts, NIC markets the servicesreport and solicits users to complete government-based transactions and to enter into subscriber contracts permitting users to access themaking digital government services and the government information contained therein in exchange for transactional and/or subscription user fees.payments. The Company typically manages operations for each contractual relationship through separate local subsidiaries that operate as decentralized businesses with a high degree of autonomy. NIC’s business model allows the Company to earn revenues by providing access to digital government services. The Company collects transaction fees paid by end users of the services and retains its portion for services provided to the government partner. The Company is typically responsible for funding the up-front investments and ongoing operations and maintenance costs of the digital government services.


The Company’s software & services businesses primarily include its subsidiaries that provide certain standalone SaaS solutions relating to payment processing, healthcare and licensing, COVID-19 testing solutions, software development and other digital government services, other than on an enterprise-wide basis,those services provided under state enterprise contracts, to federal, state and local governments as well as federal agencies.governments.


2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Basis of presentation


The Company classifies its revenues and cost of revenues into two2 categories: (1) portalstate enterprise and (2) software & services. The portalstate enterprise category generally includes revenues and cost of revenues from the Company’s subsidiaries operating enterprise-wide digital government services on behalf of state and local governments. The software & services category primarily includes revenues and cost of revenues from the Company’s subsidiaries that provide digital government services, other than those services provided on an enterprise-wide basis, to federal, state and local governments as well as federal agencies.governments. The primary categories of operating expenses include: state enterprise cost of portal revenues, cost of software & services cost of revenues, selling & administrative, enterprise technology & product support and depreciation & amortization. CostState enterprise cost of portal revenues consists of all direct costs associated with operating digital government services on an outsourced basis including employee compensation and benefits (including stock-based compensation), payment processing fees required to process credit/debit card and automated clearinghouse transactions, subcontractor labor costs, telecommunications, provision for losses on accounts receivable, and all other costs associated with the provision of dedicated client service such as dedicated facilities. Cost of softwareSoftware & services cost of revenues consists of all direct project costs to provide software development and services such as employee compensation and benefits (including stock-based compensation), payment processing fees required to process credit/debit card and automated clearinghouse transactions, subcontractor labor costs, and all other direct project costs including hardware, software, materials, travel and other out-of-pocket expenses. Selling & administrative expenses consist primarily of corporate-level expenses relating to market development and sales, marketing, human resource management, corporate communications and public relations, administration, information technology, security, legal, finance and accounting, internal audit and all non-customer service related costs fromservice-related costs. Enterprise technology & product support consist primarily of corporate-level expenses relating to information technology, product and security teams that support the Company’scentrally hosted infrastructure and platforms and SaaS payment processing and vertical platform solutions.

Certain amounts in the consolidated statements of income for December 31, 2019 and 2018 were reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. In 2020, the Company began classifying the current Texas payment processing contract in the software & services businesses, including compensationcategory. The Company reclassified $30.4 million and benefits, information systems$8.1 million of revenues and office rent. Selling$28.2 million and $7.7 million of cost of revenues from this contract from the state enterprise category to the software & administrative expenses also consist of management incentive compensation, including stock-based compensation,services category for the years ended December 31, 2019 and corporate-level expenses2018, respectively. The reclassification had no impact on net income or cash flows for market developmentthe years ended December 31, 2019 and public relations.2018.




50


Basis of consolidation


The consolidated financial statements include all the Company's direct and indirect wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.




46



Segment reporting


The Company reports segment information in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance for segment disclosures based upon the “management” approach, which designates the internal organization that is used by management for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source of the Company’s segments. The Outsourced Portals segment isIn 2019, the Company’sCompany had only 1 reportable segment, State Enterprise. During the first quarter of 2020, the Company made a change from 1 to 2 reportable segments, State Enterprise and generally includesPayments, which was based on quantitative and qualitative considerations, and was a result of recent changes in the Company’s subsidiaries operating digital governmentCompany's reporting structure to reclassify the Texas payment processing contract from the state enterprise category to the software & services category. In August 2020, the Company launched TourHealth services for staterapid and local governmentssecure COVID-19 testing, which during the fourth quarter of 2020, based on an enterprise-wide basis.  Authoritative guidance for segment disclosures also requires disclosures about productsquantitative considerations, was included as a third reportable segment. Currently, the Company operates with 3 reportable segments: State Enterprise, Payments and services and major customers.TourHealth. All prior year amounts have been restated to conform to the current year presentation. See Note 13, Reportable Segments and Related Information, for additional information regarding ourthe Company's segment reporting.


Cash and cash equivalents


Cash and cash equivalents primarily include cash on hand in the form of bank deposits. For purposes of the consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all non-restricted highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of one month or less to be cash equivalents.


Trade accounts receivable


The Company records trade accounts receivable at net realizable value. This value includes an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts. The Company calculates this allowance based on its history of write-offs, the level of past-due accounts, and its relationship with, and the expected future economic status of, its customers. Trade accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of receivables previously written off are recorded when received.

The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 was approximately $1.0$2.2 million and $0.6$1.2 million, respectively.


Property and equipment


Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of 8 years for furniture and fixtures, 3-10 years for equipment, 3-5 years for purchased software, and the lesser of the term of the lease or 5 years for leasehold improvements. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in results of operations for the period. The cost of maintenance and repairs is charged to expense as incurred. Significant betterments are capitalized.


The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of property and equipment to be held and used when events and circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be fully recoverable. The carrying value of property and equipment is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from the asset group is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. Fair value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flow discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that fair values are reduced for the cost to dispose. The Company did not record any significant impairment losses on property and equipment during the periods presented.




51


Software development costs and intangible assets, net


The Company has finite-lived intangible assets that consist of capitalized software development costs and purchasedacquired software. In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, intangibleIntangible assets with finite lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method, unless another method of amortization is more appropriate. Such costs are included in depreciation & amortization in the consolidated statements of income.

The Company carries intangible assets at cost less accumulated amortization. The estimated economic life for finite-lived intangible assets is typically 3 to 5 years from the date the software is placed in production. At each balance sheet date, or

Intangible assets are recorded at cost, less accumulated amortization and are evaluated for recoverability of possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances warrant, the Company assesses the carrying value of intangible assets for possible impairment based primarily on the ability to recover the balances from expected future cash flows on an undiscounted



47


basis. If the sum of the expected future cash flows on an undiscounted basis were to be less thanindicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amounts of the asset group to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If such review indicated that the carrying amount of an intangible asset group was not recoverable, an impairment loss would be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value of the intangible asset group exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. The Company has not recorded any material impairment losses on intangible assets during the periods presented.


The majority of the costs incurred by the Company to obtain a contract, which consist primarily consist of salaries of business development employees working to obtain the contract, are fixed in nature, occur regardless of whether a contract is obtained and are expensed as incurred. The Company expenses as incurred all employee costs to start up, operate and maintain digital government services on an enterprise-wide basis as costs of performance under the contracts because, after the completion of a defined contract term, the government entity with which the Company contracts typically receives a perpetual, royalty-free license to the applications the Company developed, excluding applications provided on a SaaS basis. Such costs are included in state enterprise cost of portal revenues in the consolidated statements of income. Other costs to fulfill a contract, such as the procurement of property and equipment and certain software development costs, are accounted for under other authoritative guidance.


Goodwill and intangible assets

In accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, the Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill, at least annually or more frequently whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the fair value of the reporting unit may be less than its carrying amount. Impairment tests are performed annually during the fourth quarter and are performed at the reporting unit level. As of December 31, 2020, the Company did not identify any impairment of goodwill.

Accrued expenses


As of each balance sheet date, the Company estimates expenses which have been incurred but not yet paid or for which invoices have not yet been received. Significant components of accrued expenses consist primarily of payment processing fees, subcontractor costs, employee compensation and benefits (including incentive compensation, bonuses, vacation, health insurance and employer 401(k) contributions), and third-party professional service fees, and miscellaneous other accruals.fees.


Revenue recognition


The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC 606, which the Company adopted on January 1, 2018. Revenue from Contracts with Customers. In accordance with ASC 606, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration which the Company expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services.  To determine revenue recognition for arrangements within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation.  The Company only applies the five-step model to contracts when it is probable that the Company will collect the consideration it is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services it transfers to the customer.  At contract inception, the Company assesses the goods or services promised within each contract and determines those that are performance obligations and assesses whether each promised good or service is distinct.  The Company then recognizes as revenue the amount of the transaction price that is allocated to the respective performance obligation when (or as) the performance obligation is satisfied. Sales and usage-based taxes, if applicable, are excluded from revenues.






4852




Disaggregation of Revenue


The Company currently earns revenues from three main sources: (i) transaction-based fees, which consist of IGS, DHR and other transaction-based revenues, (ii) software development & services and (iii) fixed fees for portal managementfixed-fee services. The following table summarizes, by reportable and operating segment, ourthe principal activities from which the Company generates revenue (in thousands):

Reportable Segments
 State EnterprisePaymentsTourHealthAll OtherConsolidated
Total
December 31, 2020
IGS$209,903 $$$$209,903 
DHR85,337 85,337 
Other41,092 22,415 20,799 84,306 
Total transaction-based295,240 41,092 22,415 20,799 379,546 
Development services31,530 31,530 
Fixed-fee services4,950 39,219 5,209 49,378 
Total revenues$331,720 $41,092 $61,634 $26,008 $460,454 
December 31, 2019
IGS$183,987 $$$$183,987 
DHR91,059 91,059 
Other37,976 22,019 59,995 
Total transaction-based275,046 37,976 22,019 335,041 
Development services10,285 10,285 
Fixed-fee services4,950 3,929 8,879 
Total revenues$290,281 $37,976 $$25,948 $354,205 
December 31, 2018
IGS$195,155 $$$$195,155 
DHR100,241 100,241 
Other10,936 19,813 30,749 
Total transaction-based295,396 10,936 19,813 326,145 
Development services12,146 12,146 
Fixed-fee services4,950 1,659 6,609 
Total revenues$312,492 $10,936 $$21,472 $344,900 
  Reportable and Operating Segments
  
Outsourced
Portals
 
Other Software
& Services
 
Consolidated
Total
December 31, 2018      
IGS $203,247
 $
 $203,247
DHR 100,241
 
 100,241
Other 
 24,316
 24,316
Total transaction-based 303,488
 24,316
 327,804
Software development & services 12,146
 
 12,146
Portal management 4,950
 
 4,950
Total revenues $320,584
 $24,316
 $344,900
       
December 31, 2017      
IGS $192,200
 $
 $192,200
DHR 103,899
 
 103,899
Other 
 25,157
 25,157
Total transaction-based 296,099
 25,157
 321,256
Software development & services 10,180
 
 10,180
Portal management 5,072
 
 5,072
Total revenues $311,351
 $25,157
 $336,508
       
December 31, 2016      
IGS $174,470
 $
 $174,470
DHR 105,463
 
 105,463
Other 
 20,917
 20,917
Total transaction-based 279,933
 20,917
 300,850
Software development & services 11,965
 
 11,965
Portal management 5,100
 
 5,100
Total revenues $296,998
 $20,917
 $317,915


Transaction-based revenuesRevenues


The Company recognizes revenue from providing outsourced digital services to its government partners.partners primarily utilizing the Company's internally developed proprietary applications. Under these contracts, the Company agrees to provide continuous access to digital government services that allow end-user consumers to complete secure transactions, such as applying for a permit, retrieving government records, or filing a government-mandated form or report. The contractual promise to provide continuous access to each of these digital government services is a single stand-ready performance obligation. The processing of transactions is highly automated based on contractual terms with the Company's government partners.


Transaction-based fees earned by the Company are typically usage-based and calculated based on the number of transactions processed each day at the contractual net fee earned by the Company for each transaction. These usage-based fees are deemed to be variable consideration that meets the practical expedient within ASC 606 whereby the


53


Company is not required to disclose the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations if the variable consideration is allocated



49


entirely to a wholly unsatisfied performance obligation. Under these arrangements, the usage-based fees are fully constrained and recognized once the uncertainties associated with the constraint are resolved, which is when the related transactions occur each day.


The Company satisfies its performance obligation by providing access to applicationsdigital solutions over the contractual term and by processing transactions as they are initiated by end-user consumers. The performance obligation is satisfied on the daywhen the Company provides the access and it is used by the end-user consumer.


In most of its transaction-based revenue arrangements, the Company acts as an agent and recognizes revenue on a net basis. The gross transaction fees collected by the Company from end-user consumers on behalf of its government partners are not recognized as revenue but are accrued as accounts payable when the services are provided at the time of the transactions. The Company must remit a certain amount or a percentage of these fees to government agencies regardless of whether the Company ultimately collects the fees from the consumer. As a result, trade accounts receivable and accounts payable reflect the gross amounts outstanding at the balance sheet dates.


Under certain contracts, the Company’s government partners may receive consideration for a portion of the transaction fee remitted to the Company. In circumstances where the Company receives a discernible benefit equal to or greater than the fair value of the consideration in the arrangement, the consideration paid to the government partner is recorded on a gross basis within costs of revenues. Otherwise, the consideration paid to the government partner is accounted for on a net basis as a reduction in the transaction-based fee recorded within revenue.


Software development and services revenuesDevelopment Services Revenues


The Company’s softwareCompany earns development and services revenues primarily include revenues from providingunder contracts to provide software development and other time and materials services to ourits government partners. The Company identifies each performance obligation in its software development and services contracts at contract inception, which are generally combined into a single promise. The contract pricing is either at stated billing rates per hour or a fixed amount. These contracts are generally short-term in nature and not longer than one year in duration.


For services provided under software development and services agreementscontracts that result in the transfer of control over time, the underlying deliverable is owned and controlled by the customer and does not create an asset with an alternative use to the Company. The Company recognizes revenue on rate per hour contracts based on the amount billable to the customer, as the Company has the right to invoice the customer in an amount that directly corresponds with the value to the customer of the Company’s performance to date. For fixed feefixed-fee contracts, the Company utilizes the input method and recognizes revenue based on the labor expended to date relative to the total labor expected to satisfy the contract performance obligation. This input measure of progress is used because it best depicts the transfer of assets to the customer, which occurs as the Company incurs costs to deliver the promise in the contracts. Certain software development and service contracts include substantive customer acceptance provisions. In contracts that include substantive customer acceptance provisions, the Company recognizes revenue at a point in time upon customer acceptance.


Under its software development and services contracts, the Company typically does not have significant future performance obligations that extend beyond one year. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the total transaction price allocated to unsatisfied performance obligations was approximately $2.8$7.2 million.


Portal management revenuesFixed-fee Services Revenues


Portal managementFixed-fee services revenues primarily consist of revenues from providing recurring fixed feefixed-fee services for the Company’s government partner in Indiana. ThisIndiana and other contracts for SaaS subscription-based services in the Company's software & services businesses. The Indiana contract has a single performance obligation to provide a broad scope of services to manage the digital government services for the state of Indiana. The Company satisfies its performance obligation by providing services to the state over time. The contract can be terminated without a penalty by the state with a 30-day notice, and accordingly, the period over which the Company performs services is commensurate with a month to month contract. Consideration consists of a fixed-monthly fee that is recognized monthly as the performance obligation is satisfied.

As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Company’s Indiana portal managementstate enterprise contract had unsatisfied performance


54


obligations for one month. The total transaction price allocated to the unsatisfied performance obligation is not significant.



The SaaS subscription-based service contracts in the Company's software & services businesses are a fixed-fee single performance obligation to provide government partners continuous access to digital services. The Company satisfies its performance obligation by providing access to digital services over the contractual term. The Company recognizes revenue for the fixed subscription fees ratably over the non-cancelable term of the contract, commencing on the date the customer has access to the solution. As of December 31, 2020, the unsatisfied performance obligations related to these subscription obligations was $17.3 million, which will be recognized over the term of such contracts, generally 1 - 5 years.


50


TourHealth Services Revenues


In August 2020, the Company began providing a rapid and secure COVID-19 testing solution referred to as TourHealth, featuring digital engagement, assessment and scheduling, as well as in-person clinical testing and logistics. TourHealth service contracts are either a transaction-based (per test) or fixed-fee single performance obligation to provide continuous access to COVID-19 testing services over a specified period of time. The Company satisfies its performance obligation by providing services to the government partners over time.

For TourHealth transaction-based fee contracts, the fees earned by the Company are typically usage-based and calculated based on the number of tests processed each day at the contractual fee earned by the Company for each test. These usage-based fees are deemed to be variable consideration that meets the practical expedient within ASC 606, which are fully constrained and recognized once the uncertainties associated with the constraint are resolved, which is when the related testing service occurs each day. For TourHealth fixed-fee contracts, consideration consists of a fee that is recognized monthly as the performance obligation is satisfied. As of December 31, 2020, the unsatisfied performance obligations related to these fixed-fee contracts was $2.0 million which is expected to be recognized during the first quarter of 2021.

Unearned and Unbilled Revenues


The Company records unearned revenues when cash payments are received or due in advance of the Company’s satisfaction of the performance obligation(s). At each balance sheet date, the Company determines the portion of unearned revenues that will be earned within one year and records that amount in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The remainder, if any, is recorded in other long-term liabilities. The Company does not assess whether a contract has a significant financing component if the expectation at contract inception is such that the period between payment by the customer and the transfer of the promised goods or services to the customer will be one year or less. Unearned revenues at December 31, 20182020 and 20172019 were approximately $1.7$6.7 million and $1.4$3.8 million, respectively. The change in the deferred revenue balance for the year primarily reflects $5.2$31.4 million of cash payments received or due in advance of satisfying our performance obligations, offset by $4.9$28.5 million of revenues recognized that were previously included in deferred revenue.

Unbilled revenues is recorded when revenue is recognized in advance of the deferredamounts invoiced to the customer and is recorded in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Unbilled revenues at December 31, 2020 and 2019 were approximately $13.2 million and $3.4 million, respectively. The change in the unbilled revenue balance for the year primarily reflects additions to the unbilled revenue balance of $41.1 million and $31.3 million of amounts billed during the period.

Contract Costs

Costs incurred to obtain customer contracts, such as sales commissions, are deferred and recorded within other current assets and other assets when such costs are determined to be incremental to obtaining a contract, would not have been incurred otherwise and the Company expects to recover those costs. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the incremental costs incurred to obtain contracts with customers were insignificant.



55


Costs incurred to fulfill customer contracts, are deferred and recorded within other current assets and other assets when such costs relate directly to a contract, generate or enhance resources of the Company that will be used in 2018.satisfying performance obligations in the future and the Company expects to recover those costs. Contract fulfillment costs may include software implementation costs and setup costs for certain SaaS solutions. These costs are recognized as assets and amortized over the expected term of the contract to which the implementation relates, which is the period over which services are expected to be provided to the customer. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the costs incurred to fulfill contracts with customers were insignificant.


Leases

All of the Company's lease arrangements are considered operating leases and are included in right of use lease assets and lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded in the consolidated balance sheet and are expensed on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

On the commencement date of a lease, the Company recognizes a lease liability and corresponding right of use lease asset based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Lease agreements generally do not provide an implicit rate and therefore the Company's incremental borrowing rate at the commencement date is used to determine the present value of lease payments. Accretion of the discount on the lease liability is calculated under the effective interest method and included in operating lease cost. The right of use asset also includes any initial direct costs and prepaid lease payments and excludes any lease incentives received by the lessor. The right of use asset is amortized over the lease term and is included in operating lease cost. The result is a single operating lease cost recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease.

Certain of the Company's leases have both lease and non-lease components. The Company has elected the practical expedient to account for these components as a single lease component for all leases.

Stock-based compensation


The Company measures stock-based compensation cost for service-based restricted stock awards at the grant date based on the calculated fair value of the award and recognizes an expense on a straight-line basis over the employee’s requisite service period for the entire award (generally the vesting period of the grant). The Company measures stock-based compensation cost for performance-based restricted stock awards at the date of grant, based on the fair value of shares expected to be earned at the end of the performance period and recognizes an expense ratably over the performance period based upon the probable number of shares expected to vest. See Note 12, Stock-based Compensation and Employee Benefit Plans, for additional information.


Income taxes


The Company, along with its wholly owned subsidiaries, files a consolidated federal income tax return. Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences in future years of differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their financial reporting amounts at each year-end based on enacted laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.


The Company does not recognize a tax benefit for uncertain tax positions unless management’s assessment concludes that it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its technical merits. If the recognition threshold is met, the Company recognizes a tax benefit based upon the largest amount of the tax benefit that is more likely than not probable, determined by cumulative probability, of being realized upon settlement with the taxing authority. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income.


Fair value of financial instrumentsEarnings per share

The carrying values of the Company’s accounts receivable and accounts payable approximate fair value.

Comprehensive income


The Company has no components of other comprehensive income or loss and, accordingly, the Company’s comprehensive income is the same as its net income for all periods presented.

Concentration of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally requires no collateral to secure accounts receivable. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, LexisNexis Risk Solutions accounted for approximately 15% and 16%, respectively, of the Company’s total accounts receivable.




51


Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

Credit Losses

In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. For trade and other receivables, the Company will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. The ASU will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2020, with early adoption permitted beginning January 1, 2019. Application of the amendments is through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the effective date. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard and the estimated impact it will have on the Company’s financial statements.

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires the recognition of right-of-use (“ROU”) assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Expenses are recognized in the statement of income in a manner similar to current accounting guidance. ASU 2016-02, as amended by ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, requires entities to adopt the standard using one of two modified retrospective approaches. 1) retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative-effect adjustment recognized at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented or (2) retrospectively at the beginning of the period of adoption through a cumulative-effect adjustment.

The Company will adopt the accounting standard on January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach, which applies the provisionstwo-class method of the new guidance at the effective date without adjusting the comparative periods presented. The Company will elect the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which allows the Company to not to reassess (i) whether expired or existing contracts contain a lease under the new standard, (ii) the lease classification for expired or existing leases or (iii) whether previously-capitalized initial direct costs would qualify for capitalization under the new standard. In addition, the Company will not elect to use hindsight during transition.

The standard will have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheets but will not have a material impact on the consolidated statements of income. The adoption of the standard is expected to result in the recognition of ROU assets and lease liabilities of approximately $12.6 million and $13.0 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606), a new standard related to revenue recognition. Under this standard, revenue is recognized when a customer obtains control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the standard requires expanded disclosure of the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The FASB has issued several amendments to the standard, including clarification on accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations.

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606, and all the related amendments, using the modified retrospective method for all contracts not completed as of the date of adoption. The adoption of ASC 606 represents a change in accounting principle for portal software development and services contracts that will more closely align revenue recognition with the



52


delivery of Company’s services, which under certain contracts will result in the recognition of revenue over time as opposed to at a point in time. Upon adoption, there was not a significant cumulative adjustment to retained earnings on the Company’s balance sheet for this change in accounting principle. Under the modified retrospective method, the comparative information was not restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods. The impact to revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018 was not significant as a result of applying ASC 606.


3. OUTSOURCED GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

State enterprise-wide contracts

The Company’s outsourced state master contracts generally have an initial multi-year term with provisions for renewals for various periods at the option of the government. The Company’s primary business obligation under these contracts is generally to design, build, and operate digital government services on an enterprise-wide basis on behalf of governments to enable access to government information and to complete transactions online. NIC typically markets the services and solicits users to complete government-based transactions and to enter into subscriber contracts permitting the user to access the services and the government information contained therein in exchange for transactional and/or subscription user fees. The Company enters into statements of work with various agencies and divisions of the government to provide specific services and to conduct specific transactions. These statements of work preliminarily establish the pricing of the online transactions and data access services the Company provides and the division of revenues between the Company and the government agency. The government oversight authority must approve prices and revenue sharing agreements. The Company has limited control over the level of fees it is permitted to retain.

The Company is typically responsible for funding the up-front investments and ongoing operations and maintenance costs of digital government services, and generally owns all of the intellectual property in connection with the applications developed under these contracts. After completion of a defined contract term, the government partner typically receives a perpetual, royalty-free license to use the applications and digital government services built by the Company only in its own state. However, certain proprietary customer management, billing, payment processing and other software applications that the Company has developed and standardized centrally and that are utilized by the Company’s portal businesses, are being provided to a number of government partners on a SaaS basis, and thus would not be included in any royalty-free license. If the Company’s contract expires after a defined term or if its contract is terminated by a government partner for cause, the government agency would be entitled to take over the services in place, and NIC would have no future revenue from, or obligation to, such former government partner, except as otherwise provided in the contract.

Any renewal of these contracts beyond the initial term by the government is optional and a government may terminate its contract prior to the expiration date if the Company breaches a material contractual obligation and fails to cure such breach within a specified period or upon the occurrence of other events or circumstances specified in the contract. In addition, 15 contracts under which the Company provides enterprise-wide digital government services, as well as the Company’s contract with the FMCSA can be terminated by the other party without cause on a specified period of notice. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 45% of the Company’s total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018. If any of these contracts is terminated without cause, the terms of the respective contract may require the government to pay the Company a fee to continue to use the Company’s applications in its state.

Under a typical state master contract, the Company is required to fully indemnify its government clients against claims that the Company’s services infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others and against claims arising from the Company’s performance or the performance of the Company’s subcontractors under the contract. At December 31, 2018, the Company was bound by performance bond commitments totaling approximately $5.8 million on certain state enterprise-wide contracts.




53


The following is a summary of the state contracts through which the Company generates meaningful revenue and has been contracted to provide enterprise-wide digital government services to multiple government agencies:
NIC Enterprise ContractState
Year Services
Commenced
Contract Expiration DateRenewal Options Through
NICUSA, IL DivisionIllinois20176/29/20236/29/2027
Louisiana Interactive, LLCLouisiana20151/28/2020
Connecticut Interactive, LLCConnecticut20141/9/2020
Wisconsin Interactive Network, LLCWisconsin20135/12/20215/13/2023
Pennsylvania Interactive, LLCPennsylvania201211/30/201911/30/2022
NICUSA, OR DivisionOregon201111/22/2021
NICUSA, MD Division Maryland20118/10/2019
Mississippi Interactive, LLCMississippi201112/31/201912/31/2021
New Jersey Interactive, LLCNew Jersey20094/30/20204/30/2022
West Virginia Interactive, LLCWest Virginia20076/30/20216/30/2024
Vermont Information Consortium, LLCVermont20066/8/2019
Colorado Interactive, LLCColorado20054/30/20224/30/2023
South Carolina Interactive, LLCSouth Carolina20057/15/20197/15/2021
Kentucky Interactive, LLCKentucky20038/31/2020
Alabama Interactive, LLCAlabama20023/19/20203/19/2022
Rhode Island Interactive, LLCRhode Island20017/1/2019
Oklahoma Interactive, LLCOklahoma20013/31/2020
Montana Interactive, LLCMontana200112/31/201912/31/2020
Hawaii Information Consortium, LLCHawaii20001/3/2020
Idaho Information Consortium, LLCIdaho20006/30/2019
Utah Interactive, LLCUtah19996/5/2019
Maine Information Network, LLCMaine19996/30/2020
Arkansas Information Consortium, LLCArkansas19976/30/2019
Indiana Interactive, LLCIndiana199510/24/2021
Nebraska Interactive, LLCNebraska19953/31/20243/31/2026
Kansas Information Consortium, LLCKansas199212/31/202212/31/2026

Outsourced federal contract

The Company’s subsidiary NIC Federal has a contract with the FMCSA to develop and manage the FMCSA’s PSP for motor carriers nationwide, using the Company’s transaction-based business model. In February 2019, the FMCSA extended the current contract through August 27, 2019, which includes three six-month renewal options. The contract can be terminated by the FMCSA without cause on a specified period of notice.

Expiring contracts

There are currently 10 contracts under which the Company provides enterprise-wide digital government services, as well as the Company’s contract with the FMCSA, that have expiration dates within the 12-month period following December 31, 2018. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 31% of the Company’s total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018. Although certain of these contracts have renewal provisions, any renewal is at the option of the Company’s government partner. As described above, if a contract is not renewed after a defined term, the government partner would be entitled to take over the services in place, and NIC would have no future revenue from, or obligation to, such former government partner, except as otherwise provided in the contract.



54



As previously disclosed, Texas NICUSA was selected to provide the payment processing services set forth in the Texas.gov 3.0 Procurement RFO (the "Texas RFO") but was not selected to provide enterprise-wide services to operations, maintenance and development. The legacy contract between the state of Texas and Texas NICUSA expired on August 31, 2018. The legacy Texas contract accounted for approximately 14%, 20% and 20% of the Company's total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, revenues from the legacy Texas contract were approximately $49.0 million, $65.7 million and $62.2 million, respectively.

In connection with the completion of the legacy Texas contract, the Company substantially reduced its workforce in Texas. Total one-time severance-related and transition costs, which have been recognized in cost of portal revenues in the consolidated statement of income in the outsourced portal segment, were approximately $1.0 million in 2018.

The contract under which the Company’s subsidiary, NICUSA Inc. (“NICUSA”), managed the state of Tennessee’s enterprise-wide digital government services expired on March 31, 2017. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, revenues from the Tennessee contract were approximately $1.8 million and $7.5 million, respectively.

The contract under which the Company’s subsidiary, Iowa Interactive, LLC, managed digital government services for the state of Iowa expired on June 30, 2016. For the years ended December 31, 2016, revenues from the Iowa contract were approximately $1.6 million.

4. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and are included in the computation ofcomputing earnings per share pursuant toas the two-class method for all periods presented. The Company’sCompany's service-based restricted stock awards containare entitled to non-forfeitable rights to dividends and are therefore considered to be participating securities. The two-classtwo-


56


class method is an earnings allocation formula that treats a participating security as having rights to undistributed earnings that would otherwise have been available to common stockholders. Accordingly, service-based restricted stock awards were included in the calculation of earnings per share using the two-class method for all periods presented. Unvested service-based restricted shares totaled approximately 0.7 million at December 31, 2018 and 0.6 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Basic earnings per share is calculated by first allocating earnings between common stockholders and participating securities. Earnings attributable to common stockholders are divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by giving effect to dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of shares related to the Company’s employee stock purchase plan is determined based on the treasury stock method. The dilutive effect of service-based restricted stock awards is based on the more dilutive of the treasury stock method or the two-class method assuming a reallocation of undistributed earnings to common stockholders after considering the dilutive effect of potential common shares other than the participating unvested restricted stock awards. The dilutive effect of performance-based restricted stock awards is based on the treasury stock method.



Business combinations

The Company accounts for the acquisition of a business in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations, which requires the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interests in an acquired business to be recorded at their fair values as of the date of acquisition. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Fair value measurements require extensive use of estimates and assumptions, particularly with respect to intangible assets, which are based on all available information at the date of acquisition, including estimates of future cash flows to be generated by the acquired assets, useful lives and discount rates. The use of different valuation techniques and assumptions could change the amounts and useful lives assigned to the assets and liabilities acquired and related amortization expense. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the Company may record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings.

Comprehensive income

The Company has no components of other comprehensive income or loss and, accordingly, the Company’s comprehensive income is the same as its net income for all periods presented.

Concentration of credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of accounts receivable. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers and generally requires no collateral to secure accounts receivable. At December 31, 2020, there were no customers that accounted for 10% or more of the Company's total accounts receivable. At December 31, 2019, LexisNexis Risk Solutions accounted for approximately 14% of the Company’s total accounts receivable.

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

Credit Losses

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in U.S. GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. For trade and other receivables, companies will be required to use a forward-looking expected loss model rather than the incurred loss model for recognizing credit losses which reflects losses that are probable. On January 1, 2020, the Company adopted the standard and all the related amendments, using a modified retrospective




5557



approach. The adoption of the standard resulted in a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of approximately $0.3 million. The adoption of the standard did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated earnings or cash flows.

3. OUTSOURCED GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

State enterprise contracts

The Company’s state enterprise contracts generally have an initial multi-year term with provisions for renewals for various periods at the option of the government. The Company’s primary business obligation under these contracts is to design, build, and operate digital government services on an enterprise-wide basis on behalf of governments desiring to provide access to government information and to digitally complete government-based transactions and payments. NIC typically markets the services and solicits end-user consumers to complete government-based transactions and to enter into subscriber contracts permitting the user to access digital applications and the government information contained therein in exchange for transactional and/or subscription user fees. The Company enters into statements of work with various agencies and divisions of the government to provide specific services and to conduct specific transactions. These statements of work preliminarily establish the pricing of the digital transactions and data access services the Company provides and the division of revenues between the Company and the government agency. The government oversight authority must approve prices and revenue sharing agreements. The Company has limited control over the level of fees it is permitted to retain.

The Company is typically responsible for funding the up-front investments and ongoing operations and maintenance costs of digital government services and generally owns all the intellectual property in connection with the applications developed under these contracts. After completion of a defined contract term or upon termination for cause, the government partner typically receives a perpetual, royalty-free license to use the applications built by the Company only in its own state. However, certain enterprise applications, proprietary customer management, billing, payment processing and other software applications that the Company has developed and standardized centrally as platforms are provided to government partners on a SaaS basis, and thus would not be included in any royalty-free license. If the Company’s contract expires after a defined term or if its contract is terminated by a government partner for cause, the government agency would be entitled to take over the applications in place, and NIC would have no future revenue from, or obligation to, such former government partner, except as otherwise provided in the contract.

Any renewal of these contracts beyond the initial term by the government is optional and a government may terminate its contract prior to the expiration date if the Company breaches a material contractual obligation and fails to cure such breach within a specified period or upon the occurrence of other events or circumstances specified in the contract.

Under a typical state master contract, the Company is required to fully indemnify its government clients against claims that the Company’s services infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others and against claims arising from the Company’s performance or the performance of the Company’s subcontractors under the contract.

Software & services contract

The Company's software & services contracts generally consist of SaaS solutions relating to payment processing, healthcare and licensing, software development, COVID-19 testing solutions and other digital government services, other than those provided on an enterprise-wide basis, to federal, state and local governments. The Company has contracts with certain Federal agencies, including a contract with the FMCSA to develop and manage the FMCSA’s Pre-Employment Screening Program (“PSP”) for motor carriers nationwide using a transaction-based business model. The Company also has contracts with certain government and government-related entities for TourHealth rapid and secure COVID-19 testing services which launched in August 2020.



58


Termination without cause contracts

There are 14 state enterprise contracts and 3 software & services contracts under which the Company provides digital government services that can be terminated by the other party without cause on a specified period of notice. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 48% of the Company’s total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. If any of these contracts is terminated without cause, the terms of the respective contract may require the government to pay the Company a fee to continue to use the Company’s applications.

Expiring contracts

There are currently 11 state enterprise contracts, as well as the Company’s contract with the FMCSA, that have expiration dates within the 12-month period following December 31, 2020. Collectively, revenues generated from these contracts represented approximately 28% of the Company’s total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020. Although 5 of these contracts have renewal provisions, any renewal is at the option of the Company’s government partners. As described above, if a contract is not renewed after a defined term, the government partner would be entitled to take over the applications in place, and NIC would have no future revenue from, or obligation to, such former government partner, except as otherwise provided in the contract. In addition, TourHealth's contracts for COVID-19 testing services currently only extend into the first quarter of 2021.

The contract under which the Company managed enterprise-wide digital government services for the state of Texas expired on August 31, 2018. The contract accounted for approximately 14% of the Company's total consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018. For the year ended December 31, 2018, revenues from the contract were approximately $49.0 million.

In connection with the completion of the legacy Texas contract, the Company substantially reduced its workforce in Texas. Total one-time severance-related and transition costs, which have been recognized in state enterprise cost of revenues in the consolidated statement of income in the state enterprise segment, were approximately $1.0 million in 2018.

Contract developments

During the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company was awarded a five-year contract with the state of Florida to provide payment processing services, which includes an option for the state to extend the contract for 1 five-year period. Under this transaction-funded contract, the Company has the ability to provide payment processing services to all state agencies and local governments in the state of Florida.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, the Company was awarded a five-year contract with the state of Iowa to provide enterprise-wide digital government services, which includes an option for the state to extend the contract up to an additional five years.

As previously discussed, during the second half 2020, the Company was awarded contracts with the state of Florida, South Carolina and Kansas, the Alabama Department of Corrections and the University of Mississippi, to provide TourHealth rapid and secure COVID-19 testing services.

Performance bond commitments

At December 31, 2020, the Company was bound by performance bond commitments totaling approximately $38.2 million on certain government contracts and other business relationships.




59


4. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company calculates earnings per share under the two-class method, as unvested service-based restricted stock awards contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends, and thus are considered securities that participate in the earnings of the Company. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (amounts in(in thousands, except per share amounts):
December 31,
202020192018
Numerator:
Net income$68,594 $50,430 $58,269 
Less: Income allocated to participating securities(736)(546)(629)
Net income available to common stockholders$67,858 $49,884 $57,640 
Denominator:
Weighted average shares - basic67,010 66,884 66,499 
Performance-based restricted stock awards107 61 
Weighted average shares - diluted67,117 66,884 66,560 
Basic net income per share:$1.01 $0.75 $0.87 
Diluted net income per share:$1.01 $0.75 $0.87 
 December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Numerator:     
Net income$58,269
 $51,614
 $55,833
Less: Income allocated to participating securities(629) (479) (492)
Net income available to common stockholders$57,640
 $51,135
 $55,341
Denominator:     
Weighted average shares - basic66,499
 66,209
 65,913
Performance-based restricted stock awards61
 57
 53
Weighted average shares - diluted66,560
 66,266
 65,966
      
Basic net income per share:$0.87
 $0.77
 $0.84
      
Diluted net income per share:$0.87
 $0.77
 $0.84


5. ASSET ACQUISITIONACQUISITIONS


DuringComplia, LLC

On May 1, 2019, the Company completed the stock acquisition of Complia, LLC ("Complia"), a regulatory licensing platform business, which the Company rebranded as NIC Licensing Solutions. The Company acquired all outstanding equity of Complia for initial consideration of $10.0 million in cash. The sellers are eligible to earn additional cash consideration up to $5.0 million, on new contracts that utilize the licensing platform through April 2022. The Company has recorded a liability of $1.0 million for the fair value of this contingent consideration at the date of acquisition as part of the consideration transferred. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined using a scenario-based model, which includes inputs such as projected earnings-based measures, probability of achievement and a discount rate, that are not observable in the market. At each reporting period, the contingent consideration liability is recorded at fair value with any changes reflected in earnings. The total purchase consideration for this acquisition was $11.0 million.

This transaction was accounted for as a business combination, and the purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, including identifiable intangible assets, based on their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. The consolidated financial statements include the results of Complia's operations from the date of acquisition. Pro-forma results of operations, assuming this acquisition was made at the beginning of the earliest period presented, have not been presented because the effect of this acquisition was not material to the Company's results.



60


The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date (in thousands).
As of May 1, 2019
Current assets$451 
Software4,200
Customer relationships425
Non-compete agreements250
Trade name35
Goodwill5,965
Other assets11
Total assets acquired11,337 
Accrued expenses and other liabilities(377)
Net assets acquired$10,960 

The goodwill was included within the software & services category, which is further described in Note 13, and represents future economic benefits that the Company expects to achieve as a result of the acquisition. The acquired capitalized software has an estimated amortization period of five years, the acquired customer relationships have an estimated amortization period of seven years and the non-compete and trade names each have an estimated amortization period of three years. The goodwill and intangible assets associated with this acquisition are deductible for tax purposes.

Leap Orbit LLC

In 2018, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire certain prescription drug monitoring software technology assets of a Maryland-based, privately held company, Leap Orbit LLC ("Leap Orbit"). The purchase price consisted of initial cash consideration of approximately $3.6 million and potential additional consideration of approximately $3.5 million if certain conditions under the agreement arewere met. The transaction was accounted for as an asset acquisition, as substantially all of the value related to the prescription drug monitoring software technology acquired. The Company expects to paypaid the additional consideration of $3.5 million in the first half of 2019, payment, which will bewas included in the cost of the acquired assets.assets in the consolidated balance sheet. The acquired software has an estimated amortization period of three years. The Company rebranded its prescription drug monitoring platform as RxGov.


6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET


Intangible assets, net consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Gross Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Book
Value
Gross Carrying
Value
Accumulated
Amortization
Net Book
Value
Software development cost$39,342 $(23,417)$15,925 $30,861 $(16,951)$13,910 
Acquired software11,241 (6,880)4,361 11,241 (3,359)7,882 
Customer relationships425 (101)324 425 (40)385 
Non-compete agreements250 (139)111 250 (56)194 
Trade name35 (19)16 35 (8)27 
Total$51,293 $(30,556)$20,737 $42,812 $(20,414)$22,398 
  December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017
  
Gross Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Book
Value
 
Gross Carrying
Value
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net Book
Value
Software development cost $22,190
 $(11,647) $10,543
 $13,610
 $(8,396) $5,214
Purchased software 3,555
 (494) 3,061
 
 
 
Total $25,745
 $(12,141) $13,604
 $13,610
 $(8,396) $5,214



During 2018,2019, the Company recorded approximately $3.6$8.4 million of intangible asset software purchases and related costsassets in connection with the Complia and Leap Orbit asset acquisition,acquisitions, as further discussed in Note 5, Asset Acquisition.Acquisitions.




61


Amortization expense for intangible assets with finite lives was $3.7$10.1 million, $1.9$8.3 million and $1.3$3.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The total estimated intangible asset amortization expense in future years is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal Year
2021$10,293 
20226,168 
20233,854 
2024341 
202561 
Thereafter20 
$20,737 
Fiscal Year  
2019 $6,003
2020 4,886
2021 2,715
  $13,604




56


7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET


Property and equipment, net consisted of the following at December 31 (in thousands):
20202019
Equipment$23,808 $24,936 
Purchased software8,566 8,769 
Furniture and fixtures6,016 5,922 
Leasehold improvements2,071 2,181 
40,461 41,808 
Less accumulated depreciation(31,120)(31,717)
Property and equipment, net$9,341 $10,091 
 2018 2017
Equipment$24,548
 $30,411
Purchased software8,971
 10,028
Furniture and fixtures5,614
 5,669
Leasehold improvements2,221
 2,249
 41,354
 48,357
Less accumulated depreciation(31,098) (38,051)
Property and equipment, net$10,256
 $10,306


Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 2017was $4.1 million, $4.3 million and 2016 was $5.4 million, $5.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively.


8. DEBT OBLIGATIONS AND COLLATERAL REQUIREMENTS


The Company has a revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. Under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ("Credit Agreement"), the credit facility provides $10 million of unsecured financings available to finance working capital, issue letters of credit and finance general corporate purposes. The Credit Agreement also includes an accordion feature that allows the Company to increase the available capacity under the Credit Agreement to $50 million, subject to securing additional commitments from the bank. The Company can obtain letters of credit in an aggregate amount of $5 million, which reduces the maximum amount available for borrowing under the Credit Agreement.

On April 28, 2017,May 1, 2019, the Company entered into Amendment No. 34 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Amendment’), which amendsamended the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of August 6, 2014, by andas previously amended, between the Company and Bank of America, N.A. (the “Credit Agreement”).the bank. The Amendment extended the maturity date of the Credit Agreement to May 1, 2019.

The2021, and increased the purchase price of a permitted acquisition, as well as the aggregate purchase price of all such permitted acquisitions during the term of the Credit Agreement providesAgreement.  Additionally, the Amendment removed the previous two-tier structure on interest rates and provided that the interest rate on any amounts borrowed by the Company under the Credit Agreement will be at (i) an annual rate adjusted daily and benchmarked to one-month LIBOR, plus a margin of 1.15% per annum, or (ii) an annual rate benchmarked to LIBOR with a term equivalent to such borrowing, or at an annual rate adjusted daily and benchmarked to LIBOR for a one-month term, in each event plus a margin of 1.15% or 1.25% depending on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. The margin is 1.15% if the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is less than 1.50:1, or 1.25% if the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio is greater than or equal to 1.50:1.per annum. 


The other material terms of the Credit Agreement remain unchanged, including customary representations and warranties, affirmative and negative covenants and events of default. The Credit Agreement requires the Company to maintain compliance with the following financial covenants (in each case, as defined in the Credit Agreement):


Consolidated tangible net worth of at least $36 million (plus the amount of net proceeds from equity issued, or debt converted to equity, in each case after the date of the Credit Agreement); and


62


Consolidated maximum leverage ratio of 1.50:1 (the ratio of total funded debt to EBITDA, as defined in the Credit Agreement).


The Company was in compliance with each of these covenants at December 31, 2018.2020. The Company issues lettershas issued a letter of credit mainly as collateral for an office lease, and to a much lesser extent, as collateral for performance on one of its outsourced government portalstate enterprise contracts. These irrevocableIrrevocable letters of credit are generally in force for one year. In total, the Company and its subsidiaries had unused outstanding letters of credit of approximately $0.2 million at December 31, 2018.2020. The Company was not required to cash collateralize these letters of credit at December 31, 2018.2020. The Company had $4.8 million in available capacity to issue additional letters of credit and $9.8 million of unused borrowing capacity at December 31, 20182020 under the Credit Agreement. Letters of credit may have an expiration date of up to one year beyond the expiration date of the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement also includes an accordion feature that allows the Company to increase the available capacity under the Credit Agreement to $50 million, subject to securing additional commitments from the bank.


At December 31, 2018,2020, the Company has a $1.0 million line of credit with a bank in conjunction with a corporate credit card agreement.






57


At December 31, 2018, the Company was bound by performance bond commitments totaling approximately $5.8 million on certain outsourced government portal contracts.

9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Operating leasesLeases


The Company and its subsidiaries leaseleases office space and certain equipment under noncancelable operating leases. Future minimumLeases have terms which range from one year to nine years, some of which include options to renew the lease. The exercise of a lease renewal option is at the Company’s sole discretion and is included in the lease term when it is reasonably certain the Company will exercise the option based on economic factors. The weighted average remaining lease term for operating leases as of December 31, 2020 was 3.2 years.

Operating lease costs for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 was approximately $6.0 million, $5.8 million and $5.3 million, respectively. Operating lease costs include short-term and variable lease costs, which are not significant. The aggregate future lease payments under all noncancelablefor operating leases atas of December 31, 20182020 are as follows (in thousands):
2020
Fiscal Year
2021$4,692 
20223,638 
20232,073 
20241,345 
2025689 
Total minimum lease payments12,437 
Less: interest(1,187)
Total lease liabilities$11,250 
Fiscal Year 
2019$4,673
20203,403
20212,604
20222,082
2023698
Thereafter690
Total minimum lease payments$14,150


Rent expense forOther information related to operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $5.3 million, $5.1 million and $4.9 million, respectively.is as follows (in thousands):

2020
Weighted-average discount rate2.4 %
Supplement cash flow information
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities$4,328 
Right of use assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities$4,429 



63


Litigation


From time to time, the Company is involved in legal proceedings and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. However, the Company is not currently a party to any material legal proceedings.


10. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


Dividend policy


In 2016, theThe Company’s Board of Directors approved a dividend policy pursuant to which it plans to make, subject to subsequent declaration, regular quarterly cash dividends of $0.08 per share, beginning with the declaration and payment of a cash dividend in the first quarter of 2017.dividends. For each dividend paid, a dividend equivalent is paid simultaneously on unvested shares of service-based restricted stock. All dividends on unvested shares of service-based restricted stock have been paid out of the Company's available cash. In addition, holders of performance-based restricted stock accrue dividend equivalents for each of the dividend declared that could be earned and become payable in the form of additional shares of common stock at the end of the respective performance period to the extent that the underlying shares of performance-based restricted stock were earned. All dividends were paid out of the Company's available cash.


Dividends


The Company's Board of Directors declared and paid the following dividends during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 (payment amount in millions):

Declaration DateDividend per ShareRecord DatePayment DateAmount
October 26, 2020$0.09December 4, 2020December 18, 2020$6.1
July 27, 20200.09September 8, 2020September 22, 20206.1
April 23, 20200.09June 11, 2020June 25, 20206.1
January 27, 20200.09March 4, 2020March 18, 20206.1
October 28, 20190.08December 4, 2019December 18, 20195.4
July 29, 20190.08September 6, 2019September 20, 20195.4
May 7, 20190.08June 11, 2019June 25, 20195.4
January 28, 20190.08March 5, 2019March 19, 20195.4

On January 28, 2019,February 1, 2021, the Company's Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.08$0.09 per share, payable to stockholders of record as of March 5, 2019.3, 2021. The dividend, which is expected to total approximately $5.4$6.1 million, will be paid on March 19, 2019.17, 2021. 



Share Repurchase



58


TheIn March 2018, the Company's Board of Directors declaredauthorized a stock repurchase program allowing the following dividends:Company to repurchase up to $25 million of common stock. During March 2020, the Company repurchased and retired 241,180 shares at a weighted average purchase price of $16.33 for a total value of $3.9 million under the repurchase program. The Company has made no other repurchases under its share repurchase program.




64


Declaration DateDividend per ShareRecord DatePayment Date
Amount
(in thousands)
2018 Year-end    
January 29, 2018$0.08March 6, 2018March 20, 2018$5,370
May 1, 20180.08June 5, 2018June 19, 20185,384
July 30, 20180.08September 5, 2018September 19, 20185,384
October 28, 20180.08December 4, 2018December 18, 20185,383
2017 Year-end    
January 30, 2017$0.08March 7, 2017March 21, 2017$5,342
May 2, 20170.08June 6, 2017June 20, 20175,350
July 31, 20170.08September 6, 2017September 20, 20175,351
October 30, 20170.08December 5, 2017December 19, 20175,350


On November 1, 2016, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a special cash dividend of $0.65 per share, payable to stockholders of record as of November 16, 2016. The dividend, totaling approximately $43.3 million, was paid on December 9, 2016.

11. INCOME TAXES

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law.  The Tax Act, among other changes, reduced the statutory federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018. The impact of the remeasurement on the Company's net deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2017, was an $0.3 million decrease in deferred tax assets. The Tax Act also included a number of other provisions including the elimination of net operating loss carrybacks and limitations on the use of future losses and the repeal of the domestic production activities deduction, among others. The Company has completed the assessment of the impact of the new tax legislation and no significant measurement period adjustments were recorded in 2018.


The provision for income taxes consists of the following (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Current income taxes:
Federal$17,150 $10,343 $13,704 
State3,561 2,478 2,255 
Total20,711 12,821 15,959 
Deferred income taxes:
Federal(946)1,182 1,466 
State(537)500 (18)
Total(1,483)1,682 1,448 
Total income tax provision$19,228 $14,503 $17,407 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Current income taxes:     
Federal$13,704
 $22,533
 $20,433
State2,255
 2,550
 2,478
Total15,959
 25,083
 22,911
Deferred income taxes:     
Federal1,466
 1,576
 (857)
State(18) 64
 (29)
Total1,448
 1,640
 (886)
Total income tax provision$17,407
 $26,723
 $22,025


The tax effects of the temporary differences that gave rise to significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows at December 31 (in thousands):

20202019
Deferred tax assets:
Stock-based compensation$1,330 $983 
Federal benefit of state uncertain tax positions563 746 
Accrued vacation618 521 
Deferred rent112 95 
Deferred payroll tax947 
State net operating loss carryforwards53 228 
Allowance for doubtful accounts552 311 
Right of use lease liability2,851 2,840 
Other873 465 
Gross deferred tax assets7,899 6,189 
Less: Valuation allowance(4)(335)
Total deferred tax assets7,895 5,854 
Deferred tax liabilities:
Property and equipment(1,830)(2,027)
Capitalized software development costs(4,423)(3,544)
Right of use lease asset(2,739)(2,746)
Total deferred tax liabilities(8,992)(8,317)
Net deferred tax liability$(1,097)$(2,463)





5965



Deferred income taxes on the balance sheet result from temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting and tax purposes. Significant componentsIn assessing the realizability of the Company’s deferred tax assets, management determines if it is probable the Company will have sufficient taxable income in certain state jurisdictions to fully utilize available tax credits and liabilities were as follows at December 31 (in thousands):
 2018 2017
Deferred tax assets:   
Stock-based compensation$1,156
 $997
Federal benefit of state uncertain tax positions954
 919
Accrued vacation550
 660
Deferred rent81
 119
State net operating loss carryforwards272
 266
Allowance for doubtful accounts240
 135
Other662
 316
Gross deferred tax assets3,915
 3,412
Less: Valuation allowance(367) (257)
Total deferred tax assets3,548
 3,155
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Property and equipment(1,834) (1,256)
Capitalized software development costs(2,495) (1,232)
Total deferred tax liabilities$(4,329) $(2,488)
Net deferred tax (liability) asset$(781) $667

other components. Deferred tax assets are reducedoffset by a valuation allowance when, into the opinion of management,extent it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets willthey are not expected to be realized. TheIn 2020, the Company has identified certain estimated state net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards that it might behad previously identified as unable to use. Based on a review of applicable state tax statutes, the Companyuse and concluded that there is substantial doubt it would be able to realize the full amount of certain estimatedthese NOL carryforwards in states where the Company cannot file a consolidated income tax return or where future taxable income will not be sufficient to utilize the state NOL before it expires.carryforwards. As a result, the Company recorded areduced its deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $0.4 million andby $0.3 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.million.


The following table reconciles the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective income tax rate indicated by the consolidated statements of income:
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
Statutory federal income tax rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
State income taxes3.5 %5.0 %2.3 %
Federal and state tax credits(2.1)%(0.8)%(2.3)%
Tax deficit (benefit) from restricted stock vestings(0.3)%(0.1)%0.3 %
Uncertain tax positions (release)(0.6)%(5.2)%0.8 %
Nondeductible expenses0.7 %2.2 %0.8 %
Other, net(0.3)%0.2 %0.1 %
Effective federal and state income tax rate21.9 %22.3 %23.0 %
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Statutory federal income tax rate21.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Domestic production activities deductions % (2.6)% (8.7)%
Federal and state tax credits(2.3)% (2.0)% (2.0)%
Tax deficit (benefit) from restricted stock vestings0.3 % (0.7)%  %
State income taxes2.3 % 1.8 % 1.4 %
Uncertain tax positions0.8 % 1.6 % 3.3 %
Nondeductible expenses0.8 % 0.7 % 0.6 %
Other, net0.1 % 0.3 % (1.3)%
Effective federal and state income tax rate23.0 % 34.1 % 28.3 %


The Company’s effective tax rate in 2020 was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate due to the effect of state income taxes and nondeductible expenses, partially offset by favorable benefits related to return to the federal research and development credit and other tax adjustments recognized upon filing the Company's 2019 tax return.

The Company’s effective tax rate in 2019 was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate due to the effect of state income taxes and nondeductible expenses, partially offset by the favorable impact of the release of reserves for unrecognized income tax benefits resulting from the expiration of the statutes of limitations for certain tax years and from the completion of an IRS tax examination of the Company’s 2016 consolidated U.S. federal income tax return, which resulted in no changes to the Company’s previously filed return. The effective tax rate was also impacted by approximately $2.6 million of executive severance costs, a significant portion of which was not deductible for income tax purposes.

The Company’s effective tax rate in 2018 was higher than the statutory federal income tax rate due mainly to the effect of state income taxes, uncertain tax positions, and nondeductible expenses, partially offset by favorable benefits related to the federal research and development credit.




60



The Company's effective tax rateCompany recognized $0.4 million in 2017 was lower than the statutory federal income tax rate due mainly to favorable benefits related to the domestic production activities deduction, the federal research and development credit, and excess tax benefits from restricted stock vestings, partially offset by a one-time charge as a result of the Tax Act, described above.

The Company's effective tax rate in 2016 was lower than the statutory federal income tax rate due mainly to favorable benefits related to the domestic production activities deduction, the federal research and development credit, an adjustment to certain deferred tax liabilities related to a previous acquisition of a business$0.1 million and the filing of the Company’s 2014 and 2013 amended federal income tax returns during the fourth quarter of 2016.

During the third quarter of 2016, the Company completed its study of qualifying activities for the domestic production activities deduction and began recognizing tax benefits for the deduction upon the filing of its fiscal 2015 federal income tax return. The Company recognized tax benefits, included in its income tax provision for 2016, of approximately $1.5 million for the 2016 tax year and approximately $1.4 million for the 2015 tax year, related to the domestic production activities deduction.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company amended its federal income tax returns for the 2014 and 2013 tax years and recognized tax benefits, included in its income tax provision for 2016, of approximately $1.2 million for the 2014 tax year and $1.0 million for the 2013 tax year, related to the domestic production activities deduction.

The Company recognized $0.3 million in tax deficits and $0.5 million in excess tax benefits from restricted stock vestings within income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, respectively. Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, excess tax benefits of $0.6 million were recognized as additional paid-in capital during 2016.




66


The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the consolidated liability for unrecognized income tax benefits (included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 (in thousands):
202020192018
Balance at January 1$5,048 $8,651 $8,020 
Additions for tax positions of prior years247 208 459 
Additions for tax positions of current years368 393 1,248 
Expiration of the statute of limitations(1,202)(3,182)(1,024)
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(103)(217)(52)
Settlements(805)
Balance at December 31$4,358 $5,048 $8,651 
 2018 2017 2016
Balance at January 1$8,020
 $6,599
 $3,721
Additions for tax positions of prior years459
 576
 1,754
Additions for tax positions of current years1,248
 1,646
 1,589
Expiration of the statute of limitations(1,024) (788) (439)
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(52) (13) (26)
Balance at December 31$8,651
 $8,020
 $6,599

The increase in the amount of the consolidated liability for unrecognized income tax benefits in 2018 was mainly due to the federal research and development credit.


At December 31, 2018,2020 and 2019, there were approximately $7.7$3.8 million and $4.3 million, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits that if recognized would affect the Company’s annual effective tax rate. It is reasonably possible that events will occur during the next 12 months that would cause the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to increase or decrease. However, the Company does not expect such increases or decreases to be material to its financial condition or results of operations.


The Company, along with its wholly owned subsidiaries, files a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return and separate income tax returns in many states throughout the U.S. The Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") is currently examining the Company's 2016 consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. The Company remains subject to U.S. federal examination for the tax years ended on or after December 31, 2013.2017. State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period of three to five years after filing of the respective return.


The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense in the consolidated statements of income. Accrued interest and penalty amounts were not significant at December 31, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016.2018.



61


12. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


The following table presents stock-based compensation expense included in the Company’s consolidated statements of income (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
202020192018
State enterprise cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization$1,585 $1,499 $1,516 
Software & services cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization162 101 151 
Selling & administrative4,599 4,495 3,994 
Enterprise technology & product support812 674 677 
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes$7,158 $6,769 $6,338 
 Year Ended December 31,
 2018 2017 2016
Cost of portal revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization$1,516
 $1,276
 $1,390
Cost of software & services revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization151
 86
 62
Selling & administrative4,671
 4,102
 4,545
Stock-based compensation expense before income taxes$6,338
 $5,464
 $5,997


Stock option and restricted stock plans


The Company has a stock compensation plan (the “NIC Plan”) to provide for the granting of restricted stock awards, incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options to encourage certain employees of the Company and its subsidiaries and directors of the Company to participate in the ownership of the Company and to provide additional incentive for such employees and directors to promote the success of its business through sharing in the future growth of such business. The Company did not grant any stock options in 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, or 20162018 and has no0 stock options currently outstanding. Instead, the Company currently expects to continue to grant only restricted stock awards.




67


As approved by the Company’s Board of Directors and stockholders, the Company is authorized to grant 15,825,223 common shares under the NIC Plan. The Company made non-material changes to the NIC Plan in 2016 to increase grantee tax withholding rights under new accounting rules that became effective for the Company in 2017. At December 31, 2018,2020, a total of 3,482,3002,776,440 shares were available for future grants under the NIC Plan.


Restricted stock


During 2018,2020, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Committee”) granted to certain management-level employees and executive officers, service-based restricted stock awards totaling 350,054297,410 shares with a grant-date fair value totaling approximately $4.9$6.3 million. Such restricted stock awards vest beginning one year from the date of grant in annual installments of 25%. During 2020, certain management-level employees were granted service-based restricted stock awards totaling 9,256 shares with a grant-date fair value totaling approximately $0.2 million, which vest over two years in 50% installments. In addition, non-employee directors of the Company were granted service-based restricted stock awards totaling 54,58434,607 shares with a grant-date fair value totaling approximately $0.8$0.7 million. Such restricted stock awards vest one year from the date of grant.


During the first quarter of 2018,2020, the Committee also granted to certain executive officers performance-based restricted stock awards pursuant to the terms of the Company’s executive compensation program totaling 177,730137,052 shares with a grant-date fair value totaling approximately $2.4$2.8 million, which represents the maximum number of shares the executive officers can earn at the end of a three-year performance period ending December 31, 2020.2022.


The actual number of shares earned will be based on the Company’s performance related to the following performance criteria over the performance period:


Operating income growth (three-year compound annual growth rate); and
Total consolidated revenue growth (three-year compound annual growth rate); and
Return on invested capital (three-year average).

At the end of the three-year period, the executive officers are eligible to receive up to a specified number of shares based upon the Company’s performance relative to these performance criteria over the performance period. In addition, the executive officers will accrue dividend equivalents for any cash dividends declared during the performance period, payable in the form of additional shares of Company common stock, based upon the maximum number of shares to be earned by the executive officers for each performance-based restricted stock award. Such hypothetical cash dividend payment shall



62


be divided by the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the dividend payment date to determine the maximum number of notional shares to be awarded. At the end of the three-year performance period and on the date some or all of the shares are paidvest under the agreement, a pro rata number of notional dividend shares will be converted into an equivalent number of dividend shares paid and granted to the executive officers based upon the actual number of underlying shares earned during the performance period.


At December 31, 2020, the three-year performance period related to the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to certain executive officers on February 22, 2018 ended. Based on the Company’s actual financial results from
2018 through 2020, 33,715 of the shares and 1,905 dividend shares were earned. The remaining 106,379 shares subject to the awards will be forfeited in the first quarter of 2021.

At December 31, 2019, the three-year performance period related to the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to certain executive officers on February 22, 2017 ended. Based on the Company’s actual financial results from 2017 through 2019, 0 shares or dividend equivalent shares were earned, and the 87,241 shares subject to the awards were forfeited.

At December 31, 2018, the three-year performance period related to the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to certain executive officers on February 22, 2016 ended. Based on the Company’s actual financial results from 2016 through 2018, 64,846 of the shares and 4,226 dividend shares were earned. The remaining 73,345 shares subject to the awards will be forfeitedwere forfeited.

During 2019, the Company's former Chief Operating Officer departed the Company. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, the Company provided severance and other related benefits. The Company incurred a total one-time cost of $2.6 million, which consisted of a one-time cash payment of $1.5 million and $1.1 million of stock-based


68


compensation expense associated with the accelerated vesting of certain restricted stock awards. Included in stock-based compensation expense was the first quarteracceleration of 2019.

At December 31, 2017, the three-year performance period related to the44,507 service-based restricted stock awards and 37,463 performance-based restricted stock awards granted to certain executive officers on February 23, 2015 ended. Based on the Company’s actual financial results from 2015 through 2017, no shares or dividend equivalent shares were earned. The 91,820 shares subject to the awards were forfeited.awards.

At December 31, 2016, the three-year performance period related to the performance-based restricted stock awards granted to certain executive officers on February 24, 2014 ended. Based on the Company’s actual financial results from 2014 through 2016, 59,437 of the shares and 4,945 dividend shares were earned. The remaining 21,503 shares subject to the awards were forfeited.


A summary of service-based restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 20182020 is presented below:
Service-based Restricted
Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2020712,162 $16.81 
Granted341,273 $21.12 
Vested(298,479)$17.20 
Canceled(23,830)$17.53 
Outstanding at December 31, 2020731,126 $18.64 
Expected to vest at December 31, 2020731,126 $18.64 
 
Service-based Restricted
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2017609,886
 $19.59
Granted404,638
 $14.15
Vested(264,583) $19.29
Canceled(32,862) $16.75
Outstanding at December 31, 2018717,079
 $16.58
Expected to vest at December 31, 2018717,079
 $16.58


The fair value of service-based restricted stock vested during the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 20162018 was approximately $5.1 million, $4.7$5.5 million and $4.6$5.1 million, respectively. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of service-based restricted stock granted during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 2017was $21.12, $16.96 and 2016 was $14.15, $21.46 and $17.67, respectively.


A summary of performance-based restricted stock activity for the year ended December 31, 20182020 is presented below:

Performance-
based
Restricted
Shares
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2020338,470 $17.01 
Granted137,052 $20.55 
Vested$22.00 
Canceled(87,241)$22.00 
Outstanding at December 31, 2020388,281 $17.14 
Expected to vest at December 31, 2020149,801 $18.48 

 
Performance-
based
Restricted
Shares
 
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2017340,689
 $18.91
Granted177,730
 $13.70
Vested
 $17.11
Canceled(91,820) $17.11
Outstanding at December 31, 2018426,599
 $17.12
Expected to vest at December 31, 201893,731
 $17.39




63


During the years with performance periods ended December 31, 2020 and 2018, 0 shares of performance-based restricted stock awards vested. The fair value of performance-based restricted stock vested duringwith the yearsperformance period ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 20162019 was approximately $0 million, $1.2 million and $1.6 million, respectively.$1.8 million. The weighted average grant date fair value per share of performance-based restricted stock granted during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 2017was $20.55, $17.27 and 2016 was $13.70, $22.00 and $17.62, respectively.


At December 31, 2018,2020, the total intrinsic value of unvested restricted stock awards expected to vest was approximately $10.1$22.8 million. At December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had approximately $8.2$10.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards. The Company expects to recognize this cost over a weighted average period of approximately two years from December 31, 2018.2020.


Employee stock purchase plan


In 1999, the Company’s Board of Directors approved an employee stock purchase plan (“ESPP”) intended to qualify as an “employee stock purchase plan” under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. A total of 2,321,688 shares of NIC common stock have been reserved for issuance under this plan. Terms of the plan permit eligible employees to purchase NIC common stock through payroll deductions up to the lesser of 15% of each employee’s compensation or $25,000. Amounts deducted and accumulated by the participant are used to purchase shares of NIC’s common stock at 85% of the


69


lower of the fair value of the common stock at the beginning or the end of the offering period, as defined in the plan. At December 31, 2020, a total of 787,353 shares were available for future grants under the ESPP.


The current offering period under this plan commenced on April 1, 2020. The closing fair market value of NIC common stock on the first day of the current offering period was $21.27 per share. In the offering period commencing on April 1, 2019 and ending on March 31, 2020, 103,628 shares were purchased at a price of $14.56 per share, resulting in total cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.5 million. In the offering period commencing on April 1, 2018 and ending on March 31, 2019, 127,600 shares were purchased at a price of $11.31 per share, resulting in total cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.4 million. In the offering period commencing on April 1, 2017 and ending on March 31, 2018, 122,152 shares were purchased at a price of $11.31 per share, resulting in total cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.4 million. In the offering period commencing on April 1, 2016 and ending on March 31, 2017, 86,998 shares were purchased at a price of $15.29 per share, resulting in total cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.3 million. In the offering period commencing on April 1, 2015 and ending on March 31, 2016, 74,976 shares were purchased at a price of $14.86 per share, resulting in total cash proceeds to the Company of approximately $1.1 million. The current offering period under this plan commenced on April 1, 2018. The closing fair market value of NIC common stock on the first day of the current offering period was $13.30 per share.


The fair values of the offerings were estimated on the dates of grant using the Black-Scholes model using the assumptions in the following table.
Offering Ending March 31, 2021Offering Ending March 31, 2020Offering Ending March 31, 2019
Risk-free interest rate0.16 %2.41 %2.08 %
Expected dividend yield1.90 %1.93 %2.06 %
Expected life1.0 year1.0 year1.0 year
Expected stock price volatility41.09 %29.94 %35.51 %
Weighted average fair value of ESPP rights$6.37 $4.49 $3.75 
 
March 31, 2018
Offering
 
March 31, 2017
Offering
 
March 31, 2016
Offering
Risk-free interest rate2.08% 1.02% 0.62%
Expected dividend yield2.06% 2.69% 3.04%
Expected life1.0 year
 1.0 year
 1.0 year
Expected stock price volatility35.51% 23.07% 28.54%
Weighted average fair value of ESPP rights$3.75
 $4.58
 $4.40


The Black-Scholes option-pricing model was not developed for use in valuing employee ESPP rights but was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded stock options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, it requires the use of subjective assumptions including expectations of future dividends and stock price volatility. Such assumptions are only used for making the required fair value estimate and should not be considered as indicators of future dividend policy or stock price appreciation or should not be used to predict the value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards. Because changes in the subjective assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate and because employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, the use of the Black-Scholes option-pricing model may not provide a reliable estimate of the fair value of ESPP rights.


Defined contribution 401(k) profit sharing plan


The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor a defined contribution 401(k) profit sharing plan. In accordance with the plan, all full-time employees are eligible immediately upon employment and non full-time employees are eligible upon reaching 1,000 hours of service in the relevant period. A discretionary match by the Company of an employee’s contribution of up



64


to 5% of base salary and a discretionary contribution may be made to the plan as determined by the Board of Directors. Expense related to Company matching contributions totaled approximately $2.7$3.3 million, $2.7$2.9 million and $2.5$2.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively.




70



13. REPORTABLE SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION


The Outsourced Portals segment is the Company’s onlyCompany currently operates in 3 reportable segments: State Enterprise, Payments and TourHealth. The State Enterprise reportable segment and generally includes the Company’s subsidiaries operating digital government services on an enterprise-wide basis for state and local governments. The Other SoftwarePayments reportable segment includes the Company's subsidiaries in the software & Servicesservices category that provide certain payment processing-related, transaction-based services mainly to state and local government agencies in states where the Company does not maintain an enterprise-wide contract. The TourHealth reportable segment includes the Company's TourHealth rapid and secure COVID-19 testing solution, which commenced in August 2020. The All Other category primarily includes the Company’sCompany's subsidiaries in the software & services category that provide software development and digital government services, other than those provided on an enterprise-wide basis, to federal agencies, including the Company's contract with the FMCSA to operate the Federal PSP and the Company's subcontract for the Recreation.gov outdoor recreation service, as well as to other state and local governments as well as federal agencies.and government-related entities, including the Company's RxGov prescription drug monitoring business and NIC Licensing Solutions regulatory licensing business. Each of the Company’s businesses within the All Other Software & Services category is an operating segment and have been grouped together to form the All Other Software & Services category, as none of the operating segments meets the quantitative threshold of a separately reportable segment. These services are not directly identifiable with the Company’s reportable operating segments. In addition, the Company accounts for non-operating activity and the costs of providing corporate and other administrative services in the Other Reconciling Items category. There have been no significant intersegment transactions for the periods reported. The summary of significant accounting policies applies to all operating segments.


The Company’s Chief Executive Officer has been identified as the chief operating decision maker ("CODM"). The measure of profitability by which management, including the CODM, evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them is operating income (loss). Segment assets or other segment balance sheet information is not presented to the Company’s CODM. Accordingly, the Company has not presented information relating to segment assets.


The table below reflects summarized financial information for the Company’s reportable and operating segments for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
State EnterprisePaymentsTourHealthAll OtherOther
Reconciling
Items
Consolidated
Total
2020
Revenues$331,720 $41,092 $61,634 $26,008 $$460,454 
Costs & expenses199,901 32,314 51,606 10,913 64,042 358,776 
Depreciation &
amortization
2,682 4,516 7,041 14,245 
Operating income (loss)$129,137 $8,772 $10,028 $10,579 $(71,083)$87,433 
2019
Revenues$290,281 $37,976 $$25,948 $$354,205 
Costs & expenses175,490 30,922 10,714 62,050 279,176 
Depreciation & amortization2,723 1,619 8,265 12,610 
Operating income (loss)$112,068 $7,051 $$13,615 $(70,315)$62,419 
2018
Revenues$312,492 $10,936 $$21,472 $$344,900 
Costs & expenses187,321 8,536 8,175 56,691 260,723 
Depreciation & amortization2,985 100 6,032 9,117 
Operating income (loss)$122,186 $2,400 $$13,197 $(62,723)$75,060 
 
Outsourced
Portals
 
Other Software
& Services
 
Other
Reconciling
Items
 
Consolidated
Total
2018       
Revenues$320,584
 $24,316
 $
 $344,900
Costs & expenses194,989
 9,043
 56,691
 260,723
Depreciation & amortization2,985
 100
 6,032
 9,117
Operating income (loss)$122,610
 $15,173
 $(62,723) $75,060
2017       
Revenues$311,351
 $25,157
 $
 $336,508
Costs & expenses191,572
 8,890
 50,780
 251,242
Depreciation & amortization2,698
 97
 4,134
 6,929
Operating income (loss)$117,081
 $16,170
 $(54,914) $78,337
2016       
Revenues$296,998
 $20,917
 $
 $317,915
Costs & expenses180,287
 5,958
 47,063
 233,308
Depreciation & amortization3,230
 77
 3,442
 6,749
Operating income (loss)$113,481
 $14,882
 $(50,505) $77,858







6571



The following table identifies each type of service, end-user consumer and state government that accounted for 10% or more of the Company’s total consolidated revenues for the years ended December 31:
Percentage of Total Revenues
202020192018
Type of Service
Motor Vehicle Driver History Record Retrieval19 %26 %29 %
Motor Vehicle Registrations11 %11 %14 %
TourHealth COVID-19 Services13 %N/AN/A
Consumer
LexisNexis Risk Solutions11 %15 %19 %
(provides motor vehicle driver history records to the insurance industry)
State Partner
ColoradoN/A10 %N/A
TexasN/AN/A17 %
(2018 consists of the legacy and payment processing contracts)



72
 Percentage of Total Consolidated Revenues
 2018 2017 2016
Type of Service     
Motor Vehicle Driver History Record Retrieval29% 31% 33%
      
Motor Vehicle Registrations14% 14% 14%
      
Consumer     
LexisNexis Risk Solutions19% 19% 22%
(Resells motor vehicle driver history records to the insurance industry)     
      
State Partner     
Texas17% 20% 20%
(2018 consists of the legacy and new payment processing contracts)     




66



14. UNAUDITED QUARTERLY OPERATING RESULTS


The unaudited quarterly information below is subject to seasonal fluctuations resulting in lower portal revenues in the fourth quarter of each calendar year due to the lower number of business days in the quarter and a lower volume of business-to-government and citizen-to-government transactions during the holiday periods.
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
(in thousands, except per share amount)
First QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth Quarter
Revenues:
State enterprise revenues$74,411 $77,804 $91,475 $88,030 
Software & services revenues16,708 15,785 43,115 53,126 
Total revenues91,119 93,589 134,590 141,156 
Operating expenses:
State enterprise cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization46,271 45,876 53,807 53,947 
Software & services cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization10,724 10,344 31,290 42,475 
Selling & administrative8,064 8,316 8,817 9,354 
Enterprise technology & product support7,254 7,201 7,342 7,694 
Depreciation & amortization3,482 3,473 3,528 3,762 
Total operating expenses75,795 75,210 104,784 117,232 
Operating income15,324 18,379 29,806 23,924 
Other income:
Interest income389 
Income before income taxes15,713 18,379 29,806 23,924 
Income tax provision3,850 4,583 4,715 6,080 
Net income$11,863 $13,796 $25,091 $17,844 
Basic net income per share$0.18 $0.20 $0.37 $0.26 
Diluted net income per share$0.18 $0.20 $0.37 $0.26 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic66,987 66,999 67,025 67,030 
Diluted66,987 66,999 67,025 67,166 
 
 For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
(in thousands, except per share amount)

First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
Revenues:       
Portal revenues$80,791
 $86,555
 $80,884
 $72,354
Software & services revenues5,934
 5,943
 6,144
 6,295
Total revenues86,725
 92,498
 87,028
 78,649
Operating expenses:       
Cost of portal revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization48,642
 51,711
 48,224
 46,412
Cost of software & services revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization2,228
 2,235
 2,226
 2,354
Selling & administrative13,150
 14,003
 14,690
 14,848
Depreciation & amortization2,065
 2,145
 2,441
 2,466
Total operating expenses66,085
 70,094
 67,581
 66,080
Operating income20,640
 22,404
 19,447
 12,569
Other income:       
Interest income
 57
 153
 406
Income before income taxes20,640
 22,461
 19,600
 12,975
Income tax provision5,132
 5,450
 3,698
 3,127
Net income$15,508
 $17,011
 $15,902
 $9,848
        
Basic net income per share$0.23
 $0.25
 $0.24
 $0.15
Diluted net income per share$0.23
 $0.25
 $0.24
 $0.15
        
Weighted average shares outstanding:       
Basic66,323
 66,541
 66,562
 66,569
Diluted66,323
 66,561
 66,598
 66,641









6773



For the Year Ended December 31, 2017For the Year Ended December 31, 2019
(in thousands, except per share amount)First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter(in thousands, except per share amount)First QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth Quarter
Revenues:       Revenues:
Portal revenues$77,198
 $79,374
 $76,434
 $78,345
State enterprise revenuesState enterprise revenues$69,853 $74,871 $73,257 $72,300 
Software & services revenues5,979
 5,952
 8,099
 5,127
Software & services revenues15,327 16,695 17,128 14,774 
Total revenues83,177
 85,326
 84,533
 83,472
Total revenues85,180 91,566 90,385 87,074 
Operating expenses:       Operating expenses:
Cost of portal revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization47,032
 49,009
 47,377
 48,154
Cost of software & services revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization1,763
 1,779
 3,169
 2,179
State enterprise cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortizationState enterprise cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization41,978 45,081 43,821 44,610 
Software & services cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortizationSoftware & services cost of revenues, exclusive of depreciation & amortization9,397 10,525 10,173 11,541 
Selling & administrative11,660
 13,131
 12,091
 13,898
Selling & administrative9,964 8,356 8,153 8,727 
Enterprise technology & product supportEnterprise technology & product support6,445 6,745 6,743 6,917 
Depreciation & amortization1,613
 1,688
 1,810
 1,818
Depreciation & amortization2,421 3,130 3,524 3,535 
Total operating expenses62,068
 65,607
 64,447
 66,049
Total operating expenses70,205 73,837 72,414 75,330 
Operating income before income taxes21,109
 19,719
 20,086
 17,423
Operating incomeOperating income14,975 17,729 17,971 11,744 
Other income:Other income:
Interest incomeInterest income604 577 729 604 
Income before income taxesIncome before income taxes15,579 18,306 18,700 12,348 
Income tax provision7,124
 6,950
 6,066
 6,583
Income tax provision4,077 3,846 4,190 2,390 
Net income$13,985
 $12,769
 $14,020
 $10,840
Net income$11,502 $14,460 $14,510 $9,958 
       
Basic net income per share$0.21
 $0.19
 $0.21
 $0.16
Basic net income per share$0.17 $0.21 $0.21 $0.15 
Diluted net income per share$0.21
 $0.19
 $0.21
 $0.16
Diluted net income per share$0.17 $0.21 $0.21 $0.15 
       
Weighted average shares outstanding:       Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic66,046
 66,248
 66,267
 66,270
Basic66,670 66,940 66,960 66,967 
Diluted66,046
 66,248
 66,267
 66,334
Diluted66,670 66,940 66,960 66,967 






68


15. SUBSEQUENT EVENT


As previously disclosed, Robert Knapp stepped downMerger Agreement

On February 9, 2021, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Tyler Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Tyler Technologies”), and Topos Acquisition, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tyler Technologies (“Merger Sub”). The Merger Agreement provides that, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with the Company (the “Merger” and, collectively with the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, the “Transactions”), with the Company continuing as Chief Operating Officerthe surviving corporation and as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Tyler Technologies.

Consideration to the Company's Stockholders

At the effective time of the Merger (“Effective Time”), each share of common stock of the Company (the “Common Stock”), issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than shares of Common Stock (i) owned by Tyler Technologies, Merger Sub or any of their respective subsidiaries, (ii) owned by the Company or any of its subsidiaries, including shares held as treasury stock, (iii) for which appraisal rights have been demanded properly in


74


accordance with Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or (iv) that are subject to Assumed RSAs (as defined below)), shall be converted into the right to receive $34.00 per share in cash, without interest (the “Merger Consideration”).

Treatment of NIC Equity Awards and NIC Employee Stock Purchase Plan

Immediately prior to the Effective Time, each outstanding restricted stock award granted under the Company’s equity compensation plan (each, a “NIC Restricted Stock Award”) that is fully vested and not subject to any restrictions (or that, pursuant to its terms as in effect on January 27, 2019. Inthe date of the Merger Agreement or the terms of the Merger Agreement, will accelerate in full and no longer be subject to any further vesting as a result of or in connection with Mr. Knapp's separation, he received post-termination severance paymentsthe consummation of the Transactions), will be released to the holder of such NIC Restricted Stock Award, to the extent not previously released, and converted into the right to receive, with respect to each share of Common Stock subject to such NIC Restricted Stock Award (as determined in accordance with the applicable award agreement), the Merger Consideration, less all applicable withholding and other authorized deductions.

At the Effective Time, each NIC Restricted Stock Award that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time and that vests solely based on the achievement of performance goals will automatically vest in full and be cancelled and converted into the right to receive, with respect to each share of Common Stock subject to such NIC Restricted Stock Award (as determined in accordance with the applicable award agreement), the Merger Consideration, less all applicable withholding and other authorized deductions.

At the Effective Time, each outstanding NIC Restricted Stock Award that vests solely based on the passage of time (other than NIC Restricted Stock Awards that are converted into the right to receive the Merger Consideration pursuant to the Merger Agreement) (each, an “Assumed RSA”), will be assumed by Tyler Technologies and converted automatically into a Tyler Technologies restricted stock award on the same terms and conditions (including any terms and conditions relating to accelerated vesting upon a termination of employment in connection with or following the Effective Time) as applicable to such Assumed RSA immediately prior to the Effective Time, except that the number of shares of Tyler Technologies common stock subject to such Assumed RSA will equal the product obtained by multiplying the total number of shares of Common Stock subject to the Assumed RSA immediately prior to the Effective Time (as determined in accordance with the applicable award agreement) by the Restricted Stock Conversion Ratio, rounded up to the nearest whole share. Each Assumed RSA shall otherwise be subject to Tyler Technologies’ equity compensation plan. For purposes of the Merger Agreement, the “Restricted Stock Conversion Ratio” means the quotient, rounded (with simple rounding) to the fourth decimal place, obtained by dividing (i) the Merger Consideration by (ii) the volume weighted average closing sale price of 1 share of Tyler Technologies common stock as reported on the New York Stock Exchange for the 10 consecutive trading days ending on the trading day immediately preceding the date on which the Closing occurs (as adjusted as appropriate to reflect any stock splits, stock dividends, combinations, reorganizations, reclassifications, or similar events).

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Company will take all actions necessary with respect to the Company's employee stock purchase plan (the “ESPP”), to provide that, among other things, participation in the ESPP after the date of the Merger Agreement will be limited to the Company's employees who participate in the offering period currently in progress as of the date of the Merger Agreement, no new offering periods under the ESPP will commence after the date of the Merger Agreement and, subject to the consummation of the Merger, the ESPP will terminate as of immediately prior to the Effective Time.

Board Approval

The Company's Board of Directors (the “Board”) has unanimously (i) determined that the terms of the Merger Agreement and the Transactions, including the Merger, are fair to, and in the best interests of, the Company and its stockholders, (ii) approved the execution and delivery by the Company of the Merger Agreement, the performance by the Company of its covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement and the consummation of the Merger and other Transactions upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, (iii) recommended that the stockholders of the Company adopt the Merger Agreement, and (iv) directed that the adoption of the Merger Agreement be submitted to a vote of the Company’s stockholders.



75


Conditions to Closing

The consummation of the Merger (the “Closing”) is subject to certain conditions, including (i) the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock to adopt the Merger Agreement (the “Stockholder Approval”), (ii) the expiration or termination of any waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and (iii) the absence of any order or law enjoining or otherwise prohibiting the Merger. Each of Tyler Technologies’ and the Company’s obligation to consummate the Merger is also subject to additional customary conditions, including (x) the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party, subject to specified materiality qualifications, and (y) performance and compliance in all material respects by the other party with its obligations, covenants and agreements under the Merger Agreement. Consummation of the Merger is not subject to a financing condition.

Representations, Warranties and Covenants

The Merger Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants made by each of the Company, Tyler Technologies and Merger Sub, including, among others, covenants by the Company regarding the conduct of its business during the pendency of the Transactions, public disclosures and other matters. Tyler Technologies has agreed to customary covenants related to treatment of employees and their compensation and benefits under Section 5.2after Closing, including commitments to honor compensatory arrangements in connection with the Transactions. The Company is required, among other things, not to solicit alternative business combination transactions and, subject to certain exceptions, not to engage in discussions or negotiations regarding an alternative business combination transaction. The Company is required to convene a meeting of its stockholders to vote on the adoption of the Key Employee Agreement, as amended, between Mr. KnappMerger Agreement.

The Company and Tyler Technologies are required to (i) use their respective reasonable best efforts to take all actions to consummate the Transactions, including taking all actions necessary to obtain antitrust approval, subject to certain limitations, and (ii) cooperate in connection with their efforts to obtain antitrust approval.

Termination Rights

Both Tyler Technologies and the Company. AsCompany may terminate the Merger Agreement under certain specified circumstances, including (a) if the Merger is not consummated by June 30, 2021, subject to 1 three month extension in order to obtain required regulatory approvals, (b) if the approval of the the Company's stockholders is not obtained, or (c) if the Company’s Board of Directors makes an adverse recommendation change with respect to the proposed transaction or to enter into a result,superior acquisition proposal.

In certain circumstances in connection with the termination of the Merger Agreement, including if the Company's Board of Directors changes or withdraws its recommendation of the Merger to its stockholders or terminates the Merger Agreement to enter into an agreement with respect to a “superior proposal,” the Company expectswill be required to record severance costs, includingpay Tyler Technologies a termination fee equal to $55.0 million in cash.

The Merger Agreement and the accelerationabove description have been included to provide investors and security holders with information regarding the terms of expense relatedthe agreement. They are not intended to provide any other factual information about Tyler Technologies, the Company or their respective subsidiaries or affiliates or stockholders.

The representations, warranties, and covenants of the Company contained in the Merger Agreement were made solely for the benefit of Tyler Technologies and Merger Sub.

The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties were made solely for purposes of allocating risk among the Company, Tyler Technologies and Merger Sub rather than establishing matters of fact and may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the Company, Tyler Technologies, and Merger Sub in connection with the negotiated terms. Moreover, some of those representations and warranties may not be accurate or complete as of any specified date, may be subject to a contractual standard of materiality different from those generally applicable to the vestingCompany’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or may have been used for purposes of certain equity awards, totaling approximately $2.6 million inallocating risk among the first quarterCompany, Tyler Technologies, and Merger Sub rather than establishing matters as facts.


76


Investors should not rely on the representations, warranties, and covenants or any description thereof as characterizations of 2019.the actual state of facts of the Company or any of its subsidiaries or affiliates.


If the Merger is consummated, the Company's Common Stock will be delisted from Nasdaq and deregistered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


None.


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures – The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that material information required to be disclosed in its filings under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting – Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued in 2013 by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.2020.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, has audited the Company's consolidated financial statements and has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, which is included in Item 8.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting – As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fourth fiscal quarter of 2018,2020, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION


None.







6977



PART III


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE


The information under “Election of Directors,” “Executive Officers,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and “Structure and Practices of the Board of Directors – Corporate Governance Principles and Best Practices and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, – Committees of the Board, – Nomination of Directors and – Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings” set forth in the Company’s definitive proxy statement related to its 20192021 annual meeting of stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.


The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which applies to all employees, directors and officers, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on the Company’s website at http://www.egov.com/investor-relations/code-of-business-conduct-and-ethicsir.egov.com/corporate-governance/governance-documents. The Company intends to disclose any changes in or waivers from its Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on its website or by filing a Form 8-K with the SEC, as required.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


The information under “Executive Compensation,” “Report of the Compensation Committee,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Tables,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation,” “Employment Agreements and Severance Payments,” and “Structure and Practices of the Board of Directors – Committees of the Board” and “Director Compensation” set forth in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.





78


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS


The information under “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” set forth in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.


Equity Compensation Plan Information


The following table provides information regarding securities to be issued upon the exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights and securities available for issuance under the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2018:2020:

ABC
Plan CategoryNumber of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
outstanding as of
December 31, 2020
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights shown in
Column A
Number of
securities
available for
future issuance as
of December 31,
2020
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:
Restricted stock awards— $— 2,776,440 (1)
Employee stock purchase plan— (2)— (2)787,353 
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders— — — 
Total— $— 3,563,793 

(1)The amount shown excludes 1,119,407 shares subject to outstanding unvested restricted stock awards.
(2)March 31, 2020 was the purchase date of common stock for the most recently completed offering period under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan. Therefore, as of such date, no purchase rights were outstanding. The purchase price for the offering period ended March 31, 2020, was $14.56 per share, and the total number of shares purchased was 103,628.



79
 A B C
Plan Category
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
outstanding as of
December 31, 2018
 
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights shown in
Column A
 
Number of
securities
available for
future issuance as
of December 31,
2018
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:           
Restricted stock awards
   $
   3,482,300
 (1)
Employee stock purchase plan
 (2) 
 (2) 1,018,581
  
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
   
   
  
Total
   $
   4,500,881
  




70


(1)The amount shown excludes 1,143,678 shares subject to outstanding unvested restricted stock awards.
(2)March 31, 2018 was the purchase date of common stock for the most recently completed offering period under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan. Therefore, as of such date, no purchase rights were outstanding. The purchase price for the offering period ended March 31, 2018, was $11.31 per share, and the total number of shares purchased was 122,152.




71


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE


The information under “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions”, “Election of Directors,” and “Structure and Practices of the Board of Directors – Independence” set forth in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTINGACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES


The information under “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” set forth in the Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A, is incorporated herein by reference.


PART IV


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1)Financial Statements.

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:
(1)Financial Statements.

The Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes, together with the report of Ernst & Young LLP, appear in Part II, Item 8, Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K.

(2)Financial Statement Schedules. All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
(3)Exhibits. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have filed or incorporated by reference the documents referenced below as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The documents include agreements to which the Company is a party or has a beneficial interest. The agreements have been filed to provide investors with information regarding their respective terms. The agreements are not intended to provide any other factual information about the Company or its business or operations. In particular, the assertions embodied in any representations, warranties and covenants contained in the agreements may be subject to qualifications with respect to knowledge and materiality different from those applicable to investors and may be qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules not included with the exhibits. These disclosure schedules may contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations, warranties and covenants set forth in the agreements. Moreover, certain representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements may have been used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties, rather than establishing matters as facts. In addition, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may have changed after the date of the respective agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the Company’s public disclosures. Accordingly, investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements as characterizations of the actual state of facts about the Company or its business or operations on the date hereof.



(1)Financial Statement Schedules. All schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
(2)Exhibits. Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have filed or incorporated by reference the documents referenced below as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The documents include agreements to which the Company is a party or has a beneficial interest. The agreements have been filed to provide investors with information regarding their respective terms. The agreements are not intended to provide any other factual information about the Company or its business or operations. In particular, the assertions embodied in any representations, warranties and covenants contained in the agreements may be subject to qualifications with respect to knowledge and materiality different from those applicable to investors and may be qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules not included with the exhibits. These disclosure schedules may contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations, warranties and covenants set forth in the agreements. Moreover, certain representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements may have been used for the purpose of allocating risk between the parties, rather than establishing matters as facts. In addition, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may have changed after the date of the respective agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the Company’s public disclosures. Accordingly, investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants in the agreements as characterizations of the actual state of facts about the Company or its business or operations on the date hereof.




80


Exhibit Index
Exhibit NumberDescription
3.12.1
3.1
3.2
4.1Reference is made
4.2



72


10.1
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.610.5
10.710.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.810.11
10.910.12
10.1010.13
10.1110.14
10.1210.15
10.1310.16
10.1410.17
10.1510.18
10.1610.19
10.1710.20



10.1810.21
10.1910.22
10.2010.23
10.2110.24
10.25
10.2210.26
10.2310.27
10.2410.28
21.1

23.1
23.1
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
101The following financial information from NIC Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, formatted in XBRL (ExtensibleiXBRL (Inline Xtensible Business Reporting Language) includes (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20182020 and December 31, 2017,2019, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 20162018 (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017,2020, 2019, and 2016,2018, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (submitted electronically herewith).
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)


** Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as Exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of this report.






ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY


None.







7583



SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
NIC INC.
Date:February 21, 201925, 2021By:/s/ Harry Herington
Harry Herington, Chairman of the Board and

Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Harry HeringtonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 25, 2021
Harry Herington(Principal Executive Officer) 
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Harry HeringtonChairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 21, 2019
Harry Herington(Principal Executive Officer) 
/s/ Stephen M. KovzanChief Financial OfficerFebruary 21, 201925, 2021
Stephen M. Kovzan(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Art N. Burtscher*Lead Independent Director
Venmal (Raji) Arasu*Director
Jayaprakash Vijayan*Director
Anthony Scott*Director
C. Brad Henry*Director
Sylvester (Sly) James, Jr.*Director
Alexander C. Kemper*Director
William M. Lyons*Director
Pete Wilson*Anthony Scott*Director
Jayaprakash Vijayan*Director
Pete Wilson*Director
/s/ Harry Herington
Harry Herington
*ByAttorney-in-fact
February 21, 201925, 2021