0001081316bhe:DefinedBenefitPlanInvestmentFundsMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:OtherPostretirementBenefitPlansDefinedBenefitMember2021-12-310001081316us-gaap:RegulatedOperationMemberbhe:MidamericanEnergyCompanyAndSubsidiariesMemberbhe:OtherMemberbhe:RegulatedretailelectricMemberbhe:ElectricityRegulatedSegmentMember2021-01-012021-12-310001081316us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMemberbhe:SierraPacificPowerCompanyMemberbhe:ElectricityRegulatedSegmentMember2020-12-31

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


[X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172022
or
[ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the transition period from ______ to _______

CommissionExact name of registrant as specified in its charter;IRS Employer
File NumberState or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organizationIdentification No.
001-14881BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY94-2213782
(An Iowa Corporation)
666 Grand Avenue
Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580
515-242-4300
Commission001-05152Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter;PACIFICORPIRS Employer93-0246090
File NumberState or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organizationIdentification No.
001-14881BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY94-2213782
(An Iowa Corporation)
666 Grand Avenue, Suite 500
Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580
515-242-4300
001-05152PACIFICORP93-0246090
(An Oregon Corporation)
825 N.E. Multnomah Street, Suite 1900
Portland, Oregon 97232
888-221-7070
333-90553MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC47-0819200
(An Iowa Limited Liability Company)
666 Grand Avenue Suite 500
Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580
515-242-4300
333-15387MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY42-1425214
(An Iowa Corporation)
666 Grand Avenue Suite 500
Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580
515-242-4300
000-52378NEVADA POWER COMPANY88-0420104
(A Nevada Corporation)
6226 West Sahara Avenue
Las Vegas, Nevada 89146
702-402-5000
000-00508SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY88-0044418
(A Nevada Corporation)
6100 Neil Road
Reno, Nevada 89511
775-834-4011

775-834-4011
Registrant
001-37591EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC46-3639580
(A Virginia Limited Liability Company)
6603 West Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia 23230
804-613-5100
333-266049EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.55-0629203
(A Delaware Corporation)
6603 West Broad Street
Richmond, Virginia 23230
804-613-5100



RegistrantSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANYNone
PACIFICORPNone
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLCNone
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANYNone
NEVADA POWER COMPANYNone
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANYNone
EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLCNone
EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.None

RegistrantName of exchange on which registered:
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANYNone
PACIFICORPNone
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLCNone
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANYNone
NEVADA POWER COMPANYNone
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANYNone
EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLCNone
EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.None

RegistrantSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANYNone
PACIFICORPNone
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLCNone
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANYNone
NEVADA POWER COMPANYCommon Stock, $1.00 stated value
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANYCommon Stock, $3.75 par value
EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLCNone
EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
RegistrantYesNo
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANYX
PACIFICORPX
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLCX
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANYX
NEVADA POWER COMPANYX
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANYX
EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC
EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
RegistrantYesNo
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANYX
PACIFICORPX
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLCX
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANYX
NEVADA POWER COMPANYX
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANYX
EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC
EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.






Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
RegistrantYesNo
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANYX
PACIFICORPX
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLCX
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANYX
NEVADA POWER COMPANYX
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANYX
EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC
EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.


Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically and posted on their corporate Web sites, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrants were required to submit and post such files).Yes x. Yes ☒ No o


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrants' knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
RegistrantLarge accelerated filerAccelerated filerNon-accelerated filerSmaller reporting companyEmerging growth company
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANYX
PACIFICORPX
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLCX
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANYX
NEVADA POWER COMPANYX
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANYX
EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC
EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrants have elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants are a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes o. Yes ☐ No x


All shares of outstanding common stock of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company are privately held by a limited group of investors. As of February 16, 2018, 77,174,325January 31, 2023, 75,627,913 shares of common stock, no par value, were outstanding.


All shares of outstanding common stock of PacifiCorp are indirectly owned by Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company. As of February 16, 2018,January 31, 2023, 357,060,915 shares of common stock, no par value, were outstanding.


All of the member's equity of MidAmerican Funding, LLC is held by its parent company, Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company, as of February 16, 2018.January 31, 2023.





All shares of outstanding common stock of MidAmerican Energy Company are owned by its parent company, MHC Inc., which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of MidAmerican Funding, LLC. As of February 16, 2018,January 31, 2023, 70,980,203 shares of common stock, no par value, were outstanding.


All shares of outstanding common stock of Nevada Power Company are owned by its parent company, NV Energy, Inc., which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company. As of February 16, 2018,January 31, 2023, 1,000 shares of common stock, $1.00 stated value, were outstanding.



All shares of outstanding common stock of Sierra Pacific Power Company are owned by its parent company, NV Energy, Inc. As of February 16, 2018,January 31, 2023, 1,000 shares of common stock, $3.75 par value, were outstanding.


All of the member's equity of Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC is held indirectly by its parent company, Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company, as of January 31, 2023.

All shares of outstanding common stock of Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. are owned by its parent company, Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company. As of January 31, 2023, 60,101 shares of common stock, $10,000 par value, were outstanding.

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company, MidAmerican Funding, LLC, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company, and Sierra Pacific Power Company, Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. meet the conditions set forth in General Instruction I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and are therefore filing portions of this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.10‑K.


This combined Form 10-K is separately filed by Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company, PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Funding, LLC, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company, and Sierra Pacific Power Company.Company, Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. Information contained herein relating to any individual company is filed by such company on its own behalf. Each company makes no representation as to information relating to the other companies.






TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
PART I
PART II
[Reserved]
PART III
PART IV



i



Definition of Abbreviations and Industry Terms


When used in Forward-Looking Statements, Part I - Items 1 through 4, Part II - Items 5 through 7A, and Part III - Items 10 through 14, the following terms have the definitions indicated.
Entity Definitions
BHEBerkshire Hathaway Energy Company
Berkshire HathawayBerkshire Hathaway Inc.
Berkshire Hathaway Energy or the CompanyBerkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
PacifiCorpPacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
MidAmerican FundingMidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries
MidAmerican EnergyMidAmerican Energy Company
NV EnergyNV Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Nevada PowerNevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Sierra PacificSierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Nevada UtilitiesNevada Power Company and its subsidiaries and Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
RegistrantsEastern Energy GasEastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
EGTSEastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries
RegistrantsBerkshire Hathaway Energy Company, PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries, MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries, Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries, Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries and Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Subsidiary RegistrantsPacifiCorp and its subsidiaries, MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries, Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries, Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries and Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Subsidiary RegistrantsPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, MidAmerican Funding, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific
Northern PowergridNorthern Powergrid Holdings Company and its subsidiaries
BHE GT&SBHE GT&S, LLC and its subsidiaries
Northern Natural GasNorthern Natural Gas Company
Kern RiverKern River Gas Transmission Company
AltaLinkBHE CanadaBHE Canada Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries
ALPAltaLinkAltaLink, L.P.
BHE U.S. TransmissionBHE U.S. Transmission, LLC and its subsidiaries
BHE Renewables, LLCBHE Renewables, LLC
HomeServicesHomeServices of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries
BHE Pipeline Group or Pipeline CompaniesConsists of Northern Natural Gas and Kern River
BHE TransmissionConsists of AltaLink and BHE U.S. Transmission
BHE RenewablesConsists of BHE Renewables,GT&S, LLC, and CalEnergy Philippines
ETTElectric Transmission Texas, LLC
Domestic Regulated BusinessesPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company, Sierra Pacific Power Company, Northern Natural Gas Company and Kern River Gas Transmission Company
BHE TransmissionBHE Canada Holdings Corporation and BHE U.S. Transmission, LLC
BHE RenewablesBHE Renewables, LLC and its subsidiaries
ETTElectric Transmission Texas, LLC
Domestic Regulated BusinessesPacifiCorp and its subsidiaries, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries, Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries, BHE GT&S, LLC and its subsidiaries, Northern Natural Gas Company and Kern River Gas Transmission Company
Regulated BusinessesPacifiCorp and its subsidiaries, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries, Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries, BHE GT&S, LLC and its subsidiaries, Northern Natural Gas Company, Kern River Gas Transmission Company and AltaLink, L.P.
UtilitiesPacifiCorp and its subsidiaries, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries and Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Northern Powergrid Distribution CompaniesNorthern Powergrid (Northeast) Limitedplc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc
ii


Berkshire HathawayTopazBerkshire Hathaway Inc.
TopazTopaz Solar Farms LLC
Topaz Project550-megawatt solar project in California
Agua CalienteAgua Caliente Solar, LLC
Agua Caliente Project290-megawatt solar project in Arizona
Bishop Hill IIBishop Hill Energy II LLC
Bishop Hill Project81-megawatt wind-powered generating facility in Illinois
Pinyon Pines IPinyon Pines Wind I, LLC

ii


Pinyon Pines IIPinyon Pines Wind II, LLC
Pinyon Pines Projects168-megawatt and 132-megawatt wind-powered generating facilities in California
Jumbo RoadJumbo Road Holdings, LLC
Jumbo Road Project300-megawatt wind-powered generating facility in Texas
Solar Star FundingSolar Star Funding, LLC
Solar Star ProjectsA combined 586-megawatt solar project in California
Solar Star ISolar Star California XIX, LLC
Solar Star IISolar Star California XX, LLC
Cove PointCove Point LNG, LP
GT&S TransactionThe acquisition of substantially all of the natural gas transmission and storage business of Dominion Energy, Inc. and Dominion Energy Questar Corporation, exclusive of Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC and related entities on November 1, 2020
DEIDominion Energy, Inc.
Dominion QuestarDominion Energy Questar Corporation
Questar Pipeline GroupDominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC and related entities
Liquefaction FacilityA natural gas export/liquefaction facility
Atlantic Coast PipelineAtlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Certain Industry Terms
AESO2017 Tax ReformThe Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017, effective January 1, 2018
AESOAlberta Electric System Operator
AFUDCAllowance for Funds Used During Construction
AUCAOCIAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
AROAsset Retirement Obligation
ASCAccounting Standards Codification
AUCAlberta Utilities Commission
BcfBARTBest Available Retrofit Technology
BcfBillion cubic feet
BTERBase Tariff Energy RatesRate
California ISOCalifornia Independent System Operator Corporation
CPUCCCRCoal Combustion Residuals
COVID-19Coronavirus Disease 2019
CPUCCalifornia Public Utilities Commission
DEAACSAPRCross-State Air Pollution Rule
D.C. CircuitU.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
DEAADeferred Energy Accounting Adjustment
DOEU.S. Department of Energy
Dodd-Frank Reform ActDodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
DthDOTDecathermsU.S. Department of Transportation
DSMDthDemand-side ManagementDecatherm
iii


EBADSMDemand-side Management
EACEnergy Adjustment Clause
EBAEnergy Balancing Account
ECACEnergy Cost Adjustment Clause
ECAMEnergy Cost Adjustment Mechanism
EEIREnergy Efficiency Implementation Rate
EEPREnergy Efficiency Program Rate
EIMEnergy Imbalance Market
EPAUnited StatesU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
ERCOTElectric Reliability Council of Texas
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
GEMAFIPFederal Implementation Plan
GAAPAccounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
GEMAGas and Electricity Markets Authority
GHGGreenhouse Gases
GWhGigawatt HoursHour
ICCIllinois Commerce Commission
IPUCIdaho Public Utilities Commission
IRPIntegrated Resource Plan
IUBIowa Utilities Board
kVKilovolt
LNGLiquefied Natural Gas
LDCLocal Distribution Company
MATSMercury and Air Toxics Standards
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MWMegawattsMegawatt
MWhMegawatt HoursHour
NERCNAAQSNational Ambient Air Quality Standards
NERCNorth American Electric Reliability Corporation
NRC
NOx
Nitrogen Oxides
NRCNuclear Regulatory Commission
OCAOATTIowa Office of Consumer Advocate

iii


Open Access Transmission Tariff
OPUCOCIOther Comprehensive Income (Loss)
OfgemOffice of Gas and Electric Markets
OPUCOregon Public Utility Commission
PCAMPower Cost Adjustment Mechanism
PTAMPGAPurchased Gas Adjustment Clause
PTAMPost Test-year Adjustment Mechanism
PUCNPTCProduction Tax Credit
PUCNPublic Utilities Commission of Nevada
RCRAResource Conservation and Recovery Act
RECRACRenewable Adjustment Clause
RECRenewable Energy Credit
RPSRFPRequest for Proposals
RPSRenewable Portfolio Standards
RRARenewable Energy Credit and Sulfur Dioxide Revenue Adjustment Mechanism
RTORegional Transmission Organization
iv


SECSCRUnited StatesSelective Catalytic Reduction
SECU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
SIPState Implementation Plan
TAM
SO2
Sulfur Dioxide
TAMTransition Adjustment Mechanism
UPSCUtah Public Service Commission
WECCVIEVariable Interest Entity
WECCWestern Electricity Coordinating Council
WPSCWyoming Public Service Commission
WUTCWashington Utilities and Transportation Commission
ZECZero Emission Credit

v

iv



Forward-Looking Statements


This report contains statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. These statements are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements can typically be identified by the use of forward-looking words, such as "will," "may," "could," "project," "believe," "anticipate," "expect," "estimate," "continue," "intend," "potential," "plan," "forecast" and similar terms. These statements are based upon the relevant Registrant's current intentions, assumptions, expectations and beliefs and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other important factors. Many of these factors are outside the control of each Registrant and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others:
general economic, political and business conditions, as well as changes in, and compliance with, laws and regulations, including income tax reform, initiatives regarding deregulation and restructuring of the utility industry and reliability and safety standards, affecting the respective Registrant's operations or related industries;
changes in, and compliance with, environmental laws, regulations, decisions and policies that could, among other items, increase operating and capital costs, reduce facility output, accelerate facility retirements or delay facility construction or acquisition;
the outcome of regulatory rate reviews and other proceedings conducted by regulatory agencies or other governmental and legal bodies and the respective Registrant's ability to recover costs through rates in a timely manner;
changes in economic, industry, competition or weather conditions, as well as demographic trends, new technologies and various conservation, energy efficiency and private generation measures and programs, that could affect customer growth and usage, electricity and natural gas supply or the respective Registrant's ability to obtain long-term contracts with customers and suppliers;
performance, availability and ongoing operation of the respective Registrant's facilities, including facilities not operated by the Registrants, due to the impacts of market conditions, outages and associated repairs, transmission constraints, weather, including wind, solar and hydroelectric conditions, and operating conditions;
the effects of catastrophic and other unforeseen events, which may be caused by factors beyond the control of each respective Registrant or by a breakdown or failure of the Registrants' operating assets, including severe storms, floods, fires, extreme temperature events, wind events, earthquakes, explosions, landslides, an electromagnetic pulse, mining incidents, costly litigation, wars (including, for example, Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022), terrorism, pandemics, embargoes, and cyber security attacks, data security breaches, disruptions, or other malicious acts;
the risks and uncertainties associated with wildfires that have occurred, are occurring or may occur in the respective Registrant's service territory for which the cause has yet to be determined; the damage caused by such wildfires; the extent of the respective Registrant's liability in connection with such wildfires (including the risk that the respective Registrant may be found liable for damages regardless of fault); investigations into such wildfires; the outcome of any legal proceedings initiated against the respective Registrant; the risk that the respective Registrant is not able to recover costs from insurance or through rates; and the effect on the respective Registrant's reputation of such wildfires, investigations and proceedings;
the respective Registrant's ability to reduce wildfire threats and improve safety, including the ability to comply with the targets and metrics set forth in its wildfire mitigation plans; to retain or contract for the workforce necessary to execute its wildfire mitigation plans; the effectiveness of its system hardening; ability to achieve vegetation management targets; and the cost of these programs and the timing and outcome of any proceeding to recover such costs through rates;
the ability to economically obtain insurance coverage, or any insurance coverage at all, sufficient to cover losses arising from catastrophic events, such as wildfires;
a high degree of variance between actual and forecasted load or generation that could impact a Registrant's hedging strategy and the cost of balancing its generation resources with its retail load obligations;
changes in prices, availability and demand for wholesale electricity, coal, natural gas, other fuel sources and fuel transportation that could have a significant impact on generating capacity and energy costs;
the financial condition, creditworthiness and creditworthinessoperational stability of the respective Registrant's significant customers and suppliers;
changes in business strategy or development plans;
vi


availability, terms and deployment of capital, including reductions in demand for investment-grade commercial paper, debt securities and other sources of debt financing and volatility in interest rates;
changes in the respective Registrant's credit ratings;
risks relating to nuclear generation, including unique operational, closure and decommissioning risks;
hydroelectric conditions and the cost, feasibility and eventual outcome of hydroelectric relicensing proceedings;
the impact of certain contracts used to mitigate or manage volume, price and interest rate risk, including increased collateral requirements, and changes in commodity prices, interest rates and other conditions that affect the fair value of certain contracts;
the impact of inflation on costs and the ability of the respective Registrants to recover such costs in regulated rates;
fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the British pound and the Canadian dollar;
increases in employee healthcare costs;
the impact of investment performance, certain participant elections such as lump sum distributions and changes in interest rates, legislation, healthcare cost trends, mortality, and morbidity on pension and other postretirement benefits expense and funding requirements;

v


changes in the residential real estate brokerage, mortgage and franchising industries and regulations that could affect brokerage, mortgage and franchising transactions;
the ability to successfully integrate future acquired operations into a Registrant's business;
the impact of supply chain disruptions and workforce availability on the respective Registrant's ongoing operations and its ability to timely complete construction projects;
unanticipated construction delays, changes in costs, receipt of required permits and authorizations, ability to fund capital projects and other factors that could affect future facilities and infrastructure additions;
the availability and price of natural gas in applicable geographic regions and demand for natural gas supply;
the impact of new accounting guidance or changes in current accounting estimates and assumptions on the consolidated financial results of the respective Registrants; and
other business or investment considerations that may be disclosed from time to time in the Registrants' filings with the SEC or in other publicly disseminated written documents.


Further details of the potential risks and uncertainties affecting the Registrants are described in the Registrants' filings with the SEC, including Item 1A and other discussions contained in this Form 10-K. Each Registrant undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing factors should not be construed as exclusive.



vi
vii



PART I


Item 1.Business


GENERAL


BHE is a holding company that owns a highly diversified portfolio of locally managed and operated businesses principally engaged in the energy industry and is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway. As of February 16, 2018,January 31, 2023, Berkshire Hathaway and family members and related or affiliated entities of the late Mr. Walter Scott, Jr., a former member of BHE's Board of Directors, (along with his family membersowned 92% and related or affiliated entities) and Mr. Gregory E. Abel, BHE's Executive Chairman, beneficially owned 90.2%, 8.8% and 1.0%8%, respectively, of BHE's voting common stock.


Berkshire Hathaway Energy's operations are organized as eight business segments: PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Funding (which primarily consists of MidAmerican Energy), NV Energy (which primarily consists of Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific), Northern Powergrid (which primarily consists of Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limitedplc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc), BHE Pipeline Group (which primarily consists of BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas and Kern River), BHE Transmission (which consists of AltaLinkBHE Canada (which primarily consists of AltaLink) and BHE U.S. Transmission), BHE Renewables and HomeServices. BHE, through these locally managed and operated businesses, owns four utility companies in the United StatesU.S. serving customers in 11 states, two electricity distribution companies in Great Britain, twofive interstate natural gas pipeline companies in the United States,U.S., one of which owns an LNG export, import and storage facility, an electric transmission business in Canada, interests in electric transmission businesses in the United States,U.S., a renewable energy business primarily investing in wind, solar, wind, geothermal and hydroelectric projects, the second largest residential real estate brokerage firm in the United States and one of the largest residential real estate brokerage firms and residential real estate brokerage franchise networks in the United States.U.S.


BHE owns a highly diversified portfolio of primarily regulated businesses that generate, transmit, store, distribute and supply energy and serve customers and end-users across geographically diverse service territories, inincluding 28 states located throughout the WesternU.S. and Midwestern United States,in Great Britain and Canada.
89%Approximately 80% of Berkshire Hathaway Energy's consolidated operating incomeadjusted earnings on common shares during 20172022 was generated from rate-regulated businesses.
The Utilities serve 4.95.2 million electric and natural gas customers in 11 states in the United States,U.S., Northern Powergrid serves 3.94.0 million end-users in northern England and ALPAltaLink serves approximately 85% of Alberta, Canada's population.
As of December 31, 2017, Berkshire Hathaway Energy owned2022, the Company owns approximately 31,800 MW35,500 MWs of generation capacity in operation and under construction:
Approximately 29,500 MWs of generation capacity is owned by its regulated electric utility businesses;
Approximately 27,500 MW of generation capacity is owned by its regulated electric utility businesses;
Approximately 4,300 MW of generation capacity is owned by its nonregulated subsidiaries, the majority of which provides power to utilities under long-term contracts;
Berkshire Hathaway Energy's generation capacity in operation and under construction consists of 33% natural gas, 31% wind and solar, 29% coal, 4% hydroelectric and 3% nuclear and other; and
As of December 31, 2017, Berkshire Hathaway Energy has invested $21 billion in solar, wind, geothermal and biomass generation facilities.
Berkshire Hathaway EnergyApproximately 6,000 MWs of generation capacity is owned by its nonregulated subsidiaries, the majority of which provides power to utilities under long-term contracts;
Owned generation capacity in operation and under construction consists of 41% wind and solar, 31% natural gas, 23% coal, 4% hydroelectric and geothermal and 1% nuclear and other; and,
Cumulative investments in (i) owned wind, solar and geothermal generation facilities of $31.6 billion and (ii) wind projects sponsored by third parties, commonly referred to as tax equity investments, of $5.8 billion.
The Company owns approximately 32,90036,300 miles of electric transmission lines, and owns a 50% interest in ETT that has approximately 1,2001,900 miles of electric transmission lines.lines, approximately 174,700 miles of electric distribution lines and approximately 2,800 substations.
The BHE Pipeline Group ownsoperates approximately 16,40021,200 miles of pipeline with a market area design capacity of approximately 8.121.1 Bcf of natural gas per day, and transported approximately 8%15% of the total natural gas consumed in the United StatesU.S. during 2017.
2022 and owns assets in 27 states. The BHE Pipeline Group also operates 22 natural gas storage facilities with a total working gas capacity of 515.6 Bcf and an LNG export, import and storage facility.
HomeServices closed over $107.8$168.3 billion of home sales in 2017, up 24.6% from 2016,2022 and continued to grow itshas brokerage, mortgage and franchise businesses.services in all 50 states. HomeServices' franchise business operateshas approximately 300 franchisees primarily in 47 statesthe U.S.

1


Human Capital

The Registrants are committed to attracting, retaining and developing the highest quality of employees; maintaining a safe, diverse and inclusive work environment; offering competitive compensation and benefit programs; and providing employees with over 365 franchisees throughout the country.
opportunities for growth and development.


Employees

As of December 31, 2017, Berkshire Hathaway Energy2022, BHE had approximately 23,00024,000 employees, consisting of which approximately 8,30013,600 (57%) electric and natural gas operations employees, approximately 6,800 (28%) real estate services employees and approximately 3,600 (15%) corporate services employees. HomeServices has approximately 45,000 real estate agents who are independent contractors. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 8,600 BHE employees were covered by union contracts. The majority of the union employees are employed by the Utilities and are represented by the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Utility Workers Union of America, the United Utility Workers Association and the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers. These collective bargaining agreements have expiration dates ranging through August 2024. HomeServices currently has nearly 41,000 real estate agents who

Safety and Security

Safety and security are independent contractorsintegral to the Registrants' culture and not employees.


Refer to Note 21will always be a part of the NotesRegistrants' top priorities. The Registrants' safety, cyber and physical security programs are built on personal ownership, compliance with standards, accountability for performance, and continuous improvement. The Registrants provide best-in-class training to Consolidated Financial Statementsensure that all employees understand the risks and have thorough and specific knowledge to protect themselves, as well as the Registrants' assets, information and operations.

The Registrants use the recordable incident rate to measure employee safety. The recordable incident rate is defined as the number of Berkshire Hathawaywork-related injuries per 100 full-time workers during a one-year period. The recordable incident rates for each of the Registrants are included below:

Year Ended
December 31, 2022
Recordable Incident Rate:
PacifiCorp0.81 
MidAmerican Energy0.52 
Nevada Power0.36 
Sierra Pacific0.79 
Eastern Energy Gas0.19 
EGTS0.15 
BHE Overall0.38 

Compensation and Benefits

The Registrants' commitment to employees is further demonstrated through competitive compensation and benefits and by providing opportunities for personal growth and career development. In addition to market-based salary, the Registrants' compensation packages include incentive programs to recognize and reward outstanding performance. The Registrants' benefits programs are designed to meet the diverse needs of employees and their families and include among other benefits:

A comprehensive and flexible benefits package that includes medical, dental and vision coverage; employee assistance programs; pre-tax flexible spending accounts; and adoption assistance;
Income protection that includes options for short- and long-term disability coverage and life insurance;
Retirement planning that includes a retirement savings plan 401(k) and a variety of employee and employer contribution and matching options;
Family Medical Leave as well as paid time off, bereavement leave and holiday benefits; and
Career development opportunities that provide access to a variety of learning programs and career development support, including tuition reimbursement or assistance.
2


BHE was incorporated under the laws of the state of Iowa in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional reportable segment information.

BHE's1999 and its principal executive offices are located at 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 500, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580, and its telephone number is (515) 242-4300. BHE was initially incorporated in 1971 as California Energy Company, Inc. under the laws of the state of Delaware242-4300 and through a merger transaction in 1999 was reincorporated in Iowa under the name MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company. In 2014, its name was changed to Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company.internet address is www.brkenergy.com.


PACIFICORP


General


PacifiCorp, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is a United StatesU.S. regulated electric utility company headquartered in Oregon that serves 1.9approximately 2.0 million retail electric customers in portions of Utah, Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, Idaho and California. PacifiCorp is principally engaged in the business of generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electricity. PacifiCorp's combined service territory covers approximately 141,000141,500 square miles and includes diverse regional economies across six states. No single segment of the economy dominates the combined service territory, which helps mitigate PacifiCorp's exposure to economic fluctuations. In the eastern portion of the service territory, consisting of Utah, Wyoming and southeastern Idaho, the principal industries are manufacturing, mining or extraction of natural resources, agriculture, technology, recreation and government. In the western portion of the service territory, consisting of Oregon, southern Washington and northern California, the principal industries are agriculture, manufacturing, forest products, food processing, technology, government and primary metals. In addition to retail sales, PacifiCorp buys and sells electricity on the wholesale market with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants to balance and optimize the economic benefits of electricity generation, retail customer loads and existing wholesale transactions. Certain PacifiCorp subsidiaries support its electric utility operations by providing coal mining services.


PacifiCorp's operations are conducted under numerous franchise agreements, certificates, permits and licenses obtained from federal, state and local authorities. The average term of the franchise agreements is approximately 25 years, although their terms range from five years to indefinite.22 years. Several of these franchise agreements allow the municipality the right to seek amendment to the franchise agreement at a specified time during the term. PacifiCorp generally has an exclusive right to serve electric customers within its service territories and, in turn, has an obligation to provide electric service to those customers. In return, the state utility commissions have established rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow PacifiCorp an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its investments.


PacifiCorp'sPacifiCorp was incorporated under the laws of the state of Oregon in 1989 and its principal executive offices are located at 825 N.E. Multnomah Street, Suite 1900 Portland, Oregon 97232, and its telephone number is (888) 221-7070. PacifiCorp was initially incorporated in 1910 under the laws of the state of Maine under the name Pacific Power & Light Company. In 1984, Pacific Power & Light Company changed221-7070 and its name to PacifiCorp. In 1989, it merged with Utah Power and Light Company, a Utah corporation, in a transaction wherein both corporations merged into a newly formed Oregon corporation. The resulting Oregon corporation was re-named PacifiCorp, whichinternet address is the operating entity today.www.pacificorp.com. PacifiCorp delivers electricity to customers in Utah, Wyoming and Idaho under the trade name Rocky Mountain Power and to customers in Oregon, Washington and California under the trade name Pacific Power.


BHE controls substantially allAll shares of PacifiCorp's common stock are indirectly owned by BHE. PacifiCorp also has shares of preferred stock outstanding that are subject to voting securities, which include both common and preferred stock.rights in certain limited circumstances.



Regulated Electric Operations


Customers


The GWhGWhs and percentages of electricity sold to PacifiCorp's retail customers by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Utah26,110 46 %25,657 46 %24,851 46 %
Oregon13,701 24 13,510 24 12,993 24 
Wyoming8,666 15 8,557 15 8,358 15 
Washington4,181 4,199 4,065 
Idaho3,707 3,553 3,534 
California799 798 759 
Total57,164 100 %56,274 100 %54,560 100 %

3

 2017 2016 2015
            
Utah24,134
 44% 24,020
 44% 24,158
 44%
Oregon13,200
 24
 12,869
 24
 12,863
 24
Wyoming9,330
 17
 9,189
 17
 9,330
 17
Washington4,221
 8
 3,982
 7
 4,108
 8
Idaho3,603
 6
 3,510
 7
 3,443
 6
California762
 1
 748
 1
 739
 1
 55,250
 100% 54,318
 100% 54,641
 100%


Electricity sold to PacifiCorp's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
GWhs sold:
Residential18,425 30 %17,905 29 %17,150 29 %
Commercial19,570 32 18,839 31 17,727 29 
Industrial17,622 28 17,909 29 18,039 30 
Other1,547 1,621 1,644 
Total retail57,164 92 56,274 92 54,560 91 
Wholesale4,836 5,113 5,249 
Total GWhs sold62,000 100 %61,387 100 %59,809 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential1,775 87 %1,745 87 %1,713 87 %
Commercial225 11 222 11 217 11 
Industrial
Other28 27 28 
Total2,037 100 %2,003 100 %1,967 100 %
 2017 2016 2015
GWh sold:           
Residential16,625
 27% 16,058
 26% 15,566
 25%
Commercial(1)
17,726
 28
 16,857
 28
 17,262
 27
Industrial, irrigation, and other(1)
20,899
 33
 21,403
 35
 21,813
 34
Total retail55,250
 88
 54,318
 89
 54,641
 86
Wholesale7,218
 12
 6,641
 11
 8,889
 14
Total GWh sold62,468
 100% 60,959
 100% 63,530
 100%
            
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):           
Residential1,622
 87% 1,599
 87% 1,574
 87%
Commercial208
 11
 205
 11
 202
 11
Industrial, irrigation, and other37
 2
 37
 2
 37
 2
Total1,867
 100% 1,841
 100% 1,813
 100%

(1)In the current year, one customer was reclassified from "Industrial, irrigation and other" into "Commercial" resulting in an increase of 61 GWh to "Commercial."


Variations in weather, economic conditions and various conservation, energy efficiency and private generation measures and programs can impact customer usage.energy requirements. Wholesale sales are impacted by market prices for energy relative to the incremental cost to generateof generating power.


The annual hourly peak customer demand, which represents the highest demand on a given day and at a given hour, occurs in the summer when air conditioning and irrigation systems are heavily used. ThePeak demand in the winter also experiences a peak demandoccurs due to heating requirements. During 2017,2022, PacifiCorp's peak demand was 10,334 MW11,017 MWs in the summer and 9,216 MW9,026 MWs in the winter.



Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply


PacifiCorp has ownership interest in a diverse portfolio of generating facilities. The following table presents certain information regarding PacifiCorp's owned generating facilities as of December 31, 2017:2022:
FacilityNet Owned
Installed /Net CapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy Source
Repowered(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
COAL:
Jim Bridger Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 (3)
Rock Springs, WYCoal1974-19792,119 1,413 
Hunter Nos. 1, 2 and 3Castle Dale, UTCoal1978-19831,363 1,158 
Huntington Nos. 1 and 2Huntington, UTCoal1974-1977909 909 
Dave Johnston Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4Glenrock, WYCoal1959-1972745 745 
Naughton Nos. 1 and 2Kemmerer, WYCoal1963-1968357 357 
Wyodak No. 1Gillette, WYCoal1978332 266 
Craig Nos. 1 and 2Craig, COCoal1979-1980837 161 
Colstrip Nos. 3 and 4Colstrip, MTCoal1984-19861,480 148 
Hayden Nos. 1 and 2Hayden, COCoal1965-1976441 77 
8,583 5,234 
NATURAL GAS:
Lake Side 2Vineyard, UTNatural gas/steam2014631 631 
Lake SideVineyard, UTNatural gas/steam2007546 546 
Currant CreekMona, UTNatural gas/steam2005-2006524 524 
ChehalisChehalis, WANatural gas/steam2003477 477 
Naughton No. 3 (4)
Kemmerer, WYNatural gas1971247 247 
Gadsby SteamSalt Lake City, UTNatural gas1951-1955238 238 
HermistonHermiston, ORNatural gas/steam1996461 231 
4


        Facility Net Owned
        Net Capacity Capacity
Generating Facility Location Energy Source Installed 
(MW)(1)
 
(MW)(1)
COAL:          
Jim Bridger Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 Rock Springs, WY Coal 1974-1979 2,123
 1,415
Hunter Nos. 1, 2 and 3 Castle Dale, UT Coal 1978-1983 1,363
 1,158
Huntington Nos. 1 and 2 Huntington, UT Coal 1974-1977 909
 909
Dave Johnston Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 Glenrock, WY Coal 1959-1972 754
 754
Naughton Nos. 1, 2 and 3(2)
 Kemmerer, WY Coal 1963-1971 637
 637
Cholla No. 4 Joseph City, AZ Coal 1981 395
 395
Wyodak No. 1 Gillette, WY Coal 1978 332
 266
Craig Nos. 1 and 2 Craig, CO Coal 1979-1980 855
 165
Colstrip Nos. 3 and 4 Colstrip, MT Coal 1984-1986 1,480
 148
Hayden Nos. 1 and 2 Hayden, CO Coal 1965-1976 441
 77
        9,289
 5,924
NATURAL GAS:          
Lake Side 2 Vineyard, UT Natural gas/steam 2014 631
 631
Lake Side Vineyard, UT Natural gas/steam 2007 546
 546
Currant Creek Mona, UT Natural gas/steam 2005-2006 524
 524
Chehalis Chehalis, WA Natural gas/steam 2003 477
 477
Hermiston Hermiston, OR Natural gas/steam 1996 461
 231
Gadsby Steam Salt Lake City, UT Natural gas 1951-1955 238
 238
Gadsby Peakers Salt Lake City, UT Natural gas 2002 119
 119
        2,996
 2,766
HYDROELECTRIC:(3)
          
Lewis River System WA Hydroelectric 1931-1958 578
 578
North Umpqua River System OR Hydroelectric 1950-1956 204
 204
Klamath River System CA, OR Hydroelectric 1903-1962 170
 170
Bear River System ID, UT Hydroelectric 1908-1984 105
 105
Rogue River System OR Hydroelectric 1912-1957 52
 52
Minor hydroelectric facilities Various Hydroelectric 1895-1986 26
 26
        1,135
 1,135
WIND:(3)
          
Foote Creek Arlington, WY Wind 1999 41
 32
Leaning Juniper Arlington, OR Wind 2006 100
 100
Marengo Dayton, WA Wind 2007-2008 210
 210
Seven Mile Hill Medicine Bow, WY Wind 2008 119
 119
Goodnoe Hills Goldendale, WA Wind 2008 94
 94
Glenrock Glenrock, WY Wind 2008-2009 138
 138
High Plains McFadden, WY Wind 2009 99
 99
Rolling Hills Glenrock, WY Wind 2009 99
 99
McFadden Ridge McFadden, WY Wind 2009 28
 28
Dunlap Ranch Medicine Bow, WY Wind 2010 111
 111
        1,039
 1,030
OTHER:(3)
          
Blundell Milford, UT Geothermal 1984, 2007 32
 32
        32
 32
Total Available Generating Capacity     14,491
 10,887
FacilityNet Owned
Installed /Net CapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy Source
Repowered(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
Gadsby PeakersSalt Lake City, UTNatural gas2002119 119 
3,243 3,013 
WIND:
TB FlatsMedicine Bow, WYWind2020-2021500 500 
Ekola FlatsMedicine Bow, WYWind2020250 250 
Pryor MountainBridger, MTWind2020-2021240 240 
MarengoDayton, WAWind2007-2008 / 2020234 234 
Cedar Springs IIDouglas, WYWind2020199 199 
GlenrockGlenrock, WYWind2008-2009 / 2019139 139 
Seven Mile HillMedicine Bow, WYWind2008 / 2019119 119 
Dunlap RanchMedicine Bow, WYWind2010 / 2020111 111 
Leaning JuniperArlington, ORWind2006 / 2019100 100 
Rolling HillsGlenrock, WYWind2009 / 2019100 100 
High PlainsMcFadden, WYWind2009 / 201999 99 
Goodnoe HillsGoldendale, WAWind2008 / 201994 94 
Foote CreekArlington, WYWind1999 / 202141 41 
McFadden RidgeMcFadden, WYWind2009 / 201928 28 
2,254 2,254 
HYDROELECTRIC:
Lewis River SystemWAHydroelectric1931-1958578 578 
North Umpqua River SystemORHydroelectric1950-1956204 204 
Bear River SystemID, UTHydroelectric1908-1984105 105 
Rogue River SystemORHydroelectric1912-195752 52 
Minor hydroelectric facilities (5)
VariousHydroelectric1895-198632 32 
971 971 
OTHER:
BlundellMilford, UTGeothermal1984, 200732 32 
32 32 
Total Available Generating Capacity15,083 11,504 
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
Various projects93 93 
15,176 11,597 


(1)
(1)Repowered dates are associated with component replacements on existing wind-powered generating facilities commonly referred to by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") as repowering. IRS rules provide for re-establishment of the PTCs for an existing wind-powered generating facility upon the replacement of a significant portion of its components. If the degree of component replacement in such projects meets IRS guidelines, PTCs are re-established for 10 years at rates that depend upon the date on which construction begins.
(2)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates PacifiCorp's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
(3)Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 are currently operating under a consent decree as described in "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K.
(4)Naughton No. 3 was converted from a coal-fueled to a natural gas-fueled generating facility in 2020.
(5)In November 2022, the FERC issued a license surrender order for the four mainstem Klamath hydroelectric dams. The remaining three hydroelectric facilities owned by PacifiCorp on the Klamath River are now included in minor hydroelectric facilities. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion.


5


Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MW) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates PacifiCorp's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
(2)As required by previous state permits, PacifiCorp planned to remove Naughton Unit No. 3 (280 MW) from coal-fueled service by year-end 2017. However, a request was submitted to and was considered by the state of Wyoming that would allow the unit to operate as a coal-fueled unit until no later than January 30, 2019, and then either close or be converted to natural gas. On March 17, 2017, the state of Wyoming issued the extension to operate the unit as a coal-fueled unit through January 30, 2019. Also, the updated Wyoming regional haze state implementation plan reflecting the extension has been submitted to the EPA for review and action. Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion.
(3)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these generating facilities may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements or (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities.

The following table shows the percentages of PacifiCorp's total energy supplied by energy source for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Coal43 %48 %48 %
Natural gas21 20 19 
Wind(1)
11 10 
Hydroelectric and other(1)
Total energy generated80 83 78 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
15 15 12 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other10 
100 %100 %100 %
 2017 2016 2015
      
Coal56% 56% 61%
Natural gas11
 15
 14
Hydroelectric(1)
7
 6
 4
Wind and other(1)
5
 5
 4
Total energy generated79
 82
 83
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other11
 10
 9
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
10
 8
 5
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)
 
 3
 100% 100% 100%


(1)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.
(1)
All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these generating facilities and purchases may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.


PacifiCorp is required to have resources available to continuously meet its customer needs and reliably operate its electric system. The percentage of PacifiCorp's energy supplied by energy source varies from year to year and is subject to numerous operational, economic and economicenvironmental factors such as planned and unplanned outages, fuel commodity prices, fuel transportation costs, weather, environmentallegislative considerations, transmission constraints and wholesale market prices of electricity. PacifiCorp evaluates these factors continuously in order to facilitate economicaleconomic dispatch of its generating facilities. When factors for one energy source are less favorable, PacifiCorp places more reliance on other energy sources. For example, PacifiCorp can generate more electricity using its low costlow-cost wind-powered and hydroelectric and wind-powered generating facilities when factors associated with these facilities are favorable. In addition to meeting its customers' energy needs, PacifiCorp is required to maintain operating reserves on its system to mitigate the impacts of unplanned outages or other disruption in supply, and to meet intra-hour changes in load and resource balance. This operating reserve requirement is dispersed across PacifiCorp's generation portfolio on a least-cost basis based on the operating characteristics of the portfolio. Operating reserves may be held on hydroelectric, coal-fueled, natural gas-fueled or certain types of interruptible load. PacifiCorp manages certain risks relating to its supply of electricity and fuel requirements by entering into various contracts, which may be accounted for as derivatives and may include forwards, options, swaps and other agreements. Refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of energy cost recovery by jurisdiction and to PacifiCorp's Item 7A in this Form 10-K for a discussion of commodity price risk and derivative contracts.


Coal


PacifiCorp has interests in coal mines that support its coal-fueled generating facilities and jointly operates the Bridger surface andcoal mine. The Bridger underground mine ceased coal mines.production in November 2021. These mines supplied 16%21%, 15%21% and 18%16% of PacifiCorp's total coal requirements during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. The remaining coal requirements for PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities are acquired through longlong- and short-term third-party contracts.



Most of PacifiCorp's coal reserves are held through agreements with the federal Bureau of Land Management and from certain states and private parties. The agreements generally have multi-year terms that may be renewed or extended and require payment of rents and royalties. In addition, federal and state regulations require that comprehensive environmental protection and reclamation standards be met during the course of mining operations and upon completion of mining activities.


Coal reserve estimates are subject to adjustment as a result of the development of additional engineering and geological data, new mining technology and changes in regulation and economic factors affecting the utilization of such reserves. PacifiCorp's recoverable coal reserves of operating mines as of December 31, 2017, based on recent engineering studies, were as follows (in millions):

Coal Mine Location Generating Facility Served Mining Method Recoverable Tons
         
Bridger Rock Springs, WY Jim Bridger Surface 29
(1)
Bridger Rock Springs, WY Jim Bridger Underground 6
(1)
Trapper Craig, CO Craig Surface 4
(2)
        39
 

(1)These coal reserves are leased and mined by Bridger Coal Company, a joint venture between Pacific Minerals, Inc. and a subsidiary of Idaho Power Company. Pacific Minerals, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of PacifiCorp, has a two-thirds interest in the joint venture. The amounts included above represent only PacifiCorp's two-thirds interest in the coal reserves.
(2)These coal reserves are leased and mined by Trapper Mining Inc., a cooperative in which PacifiCorp has an ownership interest of 21%. The amount included above represents only PacifiCorp's 21% interest in the coal reserves. PacifiCorp does not operate the Trapper mine.

Recoverability by surface mining methods typically ranges from 90% to 95%. Recoverability by underground mining techniques ranges from 50% to 70%. To meet applicable standards, PacifiCorp blends coal mined at its owned minescoal with contracted coal and utilizes emissions reduction technologies for controlling sulfur dioxideSO2 and other emissions. For fuel needs at PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities in excess of coal reserves available, PacifiCorp believes it will be able to purchase coal under both longlong- and short-term contracts to supply its generating facilities over their currently expected remaining useful lives.


6


Natural Gas


PacifiCorp uses natural gas as fuel for its combined and simple-cycle natural gas-fueled generating facilities that use combined-cycle, simple-cycle and for the Gadsby Steam generating facility.steam turbines. Oil and natural gas are also used for igniter fuel and standby purposes. These sources are presently in adequate supply and available to meet PacifiCorp's needs.


PacifiCorp enters into forward natural gas purchases at fixed or indexed market prices. PacifiCorp purchases natural gas in the spot market with both fixed and indexed market prices for physical delivery to fulfill any fuel requirements not already satisfied through forward purchases of natural gas and sells natural gas in the spot market for the disposition of any excess supply if the forecasted requirements of its natural gas-fueled generating facilities decrease. PacifiCorp also utilizes financial swap contracts to mitigate price risk associated with its forecasted fuel requirements.


HydroelectricWind


PacifiCorp has pursued renewable resources as a viable, economical and environmentally prudent means of supplying electricity and complying with laws and regulations. Renewable resources have low to no emissions and require little or no fossil fuel. The generation from PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating fleet, comprised of newly constructed and recently repowered wind-powered generating facilities, qualifies for 100% of the federal PTCs available for 10 years from the date the equipment is placed in-service. In addition to the discussion contained herein regarding repowering activities, refer to "Regulatory Matters" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K.

    Hydroelectric and Other Renewable Resources

The amount of electricity PacifiCorp is able to generate from its hydroelectric generating facilities depends on a number of factors, including snowpack in the mountains upstream of its hydroelectric generating facilities, reservoir storage, precipitation in its watersheds, generating unit availability and restrictions imposed by oversight bodies due to competing water management objectives.


PacifiCorp operates the majority of its hydroelectric generating portfolio under long-term licenses. The FERC regulates 99%98% of the net capacity of this portfolio through 1514 individual licenses, which have terms of 30 to 50 years. The licenses for majorthese hydroelectric generating facilities expire at various dates through May 2058.2061. A portion of this portfolio is licensed under the Oregon Hydroelectric Act. For discussion of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric relicensing activities, including updated information regarding the Klamath River hydroelectric system, refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 1314 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.



Wind and Other Renewable Resources

PacifiCorp has pursued renewable resources as a viable, economical and environmentally prudent means of supplying electricity and complying with laws and regulations. Renewable resources have low to no emissions and require little or no fossil fuel. PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities, including those facilities where a significant portion of the equipment is expected to be replaced, are eligible for federal renewable electricity production tax credits for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service. Production tax credits for PacifiCorp's currently eligible wind-powered generating facilities began expiring in 2016, with final expiration in 2020.

Wholesale Activities


PacifiCorp purchases and sells electricity in the wholesale markets as needed to balance its generation with its retail load obligations. PacifiCorp may also purchase electricity in the wholesale markets when it is more economical than generating electricity from its own facilities and may sell surplus electricity in the wholesale markets when it can do so economically. When prudent, PacifiCorp enters into financial swap contracts and forward electricity sales and purchases for physical delivery at fixed prices to reduce its exposure to electricity price volatility.


Transmission and Distribution
7



    Energy Imbalance Market
PacifiCorp operates one balancing authority area in the western portion of its service territory and one balancing authority area in the eastern portion of its service territory. A balancing authority area is a geographic area with transmission systems that control generation to maintain schedules with other balancing authority areas and ensure reliable operations. In operating the balancing authority areas, PacifiCorp is responsible for continuously balancing electricity supply and demand by dispatching generating resources and interchange transactions so that generation internal to the balancing authority area, plus net imported power, matches customer loads. Deliveries of energy over PacifiCorp's transmission system are managed and scheduled in accordance with FERC requirements.

PacifiCorp's transmission system is part of the Western Interconnection, which includes the interconnected transmission systems of 14 western states, two Canadian provinces and parts of Mexico. PacifiCorp's transmission system, together with contractual rights on other transmission systems, enables PacifiCorp to integrate and access generation resources to meet its customer load requirements. PacifiCorp's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 16,500 miles of transmission lines in nine states, 64,000 miles of distribution lines and 900 substations as of December 31, 2017.

PacifiCorp's transmission and distribution system is managed on a coordinated basis to obtain maximum load-carrying capability and efficiency. Portions of PacifiCorp's transmission and distribution systems are located:

On property owned or used through agreements by PacifiCorp;
Under or over streets, alleys, highways and other public places, the public domain and national forests and state lands under franchises, easements or other rights that are generally subject to termination;
Under or over private property as a result of easements obtained primarily from the title holder of record; or
Under or over Native American reservations through agreements with the United States Secretary of Interior or Native American tribes.
It is possible that some of the easements and the property over which the easements were granted may have title defects or may be subject to mortgages or liens existing at the time the easements were acquired.



PacifiCorp and the California ISO implemented an EIM in November 2014, which reduces costs to serve customers through more efficient dispatch of a larger and more diverse pool of resources, more effectively integrates renewables and enhances reliability through improved situational awareness and responsiveness. The EIM expands the real-time component of the California ISO's market technology to optimize and balance electricity supply and demand every five minutes across the EIM footprint. The EIM is voluntary and available to all balancing authorities in the Western United States.western U.S. EIM market participants submit bids to the California ISO market operator before each hour for each generating resource they choose to be dispatched by the market. Each bid is comprised of a dispatchable operating range, ramp rate and prices across the operating range. The California ISO market operator uses sophisticated technology to select the least-cost resources to meet demand and send simultaneous dispatch signals to every participating generator across the EIM footprint every five minutes. In addition to generation resource bids, the California ISO market operator also receives continuous real-time updates of the transmission grid network, meteorological and load forecast information that it uses to optimize dispatch instructions. Outside the EIM footprint, utilities in the Western United Stateswestern U.S. do not utilize comparable technology and are largely limited to transactions within the borders of their balancing authority area to balance supply and demand intra-hour using a combination of manual and automated dispatch. The EIM delivers customer benefits by leveraging automation and resource diversity to result in more efficient dispatch, more effective integration of renewables and improved situational awareness. Benefits are expected to increase further with renewable resource expansion and as more entities join the EIM, bringing incremental resource diversity. In December 2022, PacifiCorp announced its intention to join the California ISO Extended Day-Ahead Market in 2024.


Transmission and Distribution

PacifiCorp will continueoperates one balancing authority area in the western portion of its service territory ("PacifiCorp-West") and one balancing authority area in the eastern portion of its service territory ("PacifiCorp-East"). A balancing authority area is a geographic area with transmission systems that control generation to monitor regional market expansion efforts, including creationmaintain schedules with other balancing authority areas and ensure reliable operations. In operating the balancing authority areas, PacifiCorp is responsible for continuously balancing electricity supply and demand by dispatching generating resources and interchange transactions so that generation internal to the balancing authority area, plus net imported power, matches customer loads. Deliveries of energy over PacifiCorp's transmission system are managed and scheduled in accordance with the FERC's requirements.

PacifiCorp's transmission system is part of the Western Interconnection, which includes the interconnected transmission systems of 14 western states, two Canadian provinces and parts of Mexico. PacifiCorp's transmission system, together with contractual rights on other transmission systems, enables PacifiCorp to integrate and access generation resources to meet its customer load requirements. PacifiCorp's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 17,100 miles of transmission lines in 10 states, 65,300 miles of distribution lines and 900 substations as of December 31, 2022.

PacifiCorp's transmission and distribution system is managed on a regional Independent System Operator ("ISO"). California Senate Bill No. 350,coordinated basis to obtain maximum load-carrying capability and efficiency. Portions of PacifiCorp's transmission and distribution systems are located:
On property owned or used through agreements by PacifiCorp;
Under or over streets, alleys, highways and other public places, the public domain and national forests and state and federal lands under franchises, easements or other rights that are generally subject to termination;
Under or over private property as a result of easements obtained primarily from the title holder of record; or
Under or over Native American reservations through agreements with the U.S. Secretary of Interior or Native American tribes.

It is possible that some of the easements and the property over which was passed in October 2015, authorized the California legislatureeasements were granted may have title defects or may be subject to consider making changes to current laws that would create an independent governance structure for a regional ISO duringmortgages or liens existing at the 2017 legislative session. The California legislature did not pass any legislation related to a regional ISO during its 2017 legislative session, which closed September 15, 2017.time the easements were acquired.


8


PacifiCorp's Energy Gateway Transmission Expansion Program represents plans to build approximatelyover 2,000 miles of new high-voltage transmission lines, with an estimated cost exceeding $6of approximately $11 billion, primarily in Wyoming, Utah, Idaho and Oregon. The $6approximately $11 billion estimated cost includes: (a) the 135-mile, 345-kV Populus to Terminal transmission line between the Terminal substation near the Salt Lake City Airport and the Populus substation in Downey, Idaho, placed in-service in 2010; (b) the 100-mile, 345/500-kV Mona to Oquirrh transmission line between the Mona substation in central Utah and the Oquirrh substation in the Salt Lake Valley, placed in-service in 2013; (c) the 170-mile, 345-kV transmission line between the Sigurd Substationsubstation in central Utah and the Red Butte Substationsubstation in southwest Utah, placed in-service in May 2015; (d) the 140-mile, 500-kV transmission line between the Aeolus substation near Medicine Bow, Wyoming and (d) otherthe Jim Bridger generating facility, placed in-service in 2020; (e) the 416-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Aeolus substation and the Clover substation near Mona, Utah, expected to be placed in-service in 2024; (f) the 59-mile, 230-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Windstar substation near Glenrock, Wyoming and the Aeolus substation, expected to be placed in-service in 2024; (g) the 290-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line from the Longhorn substation near Boardman, Oregon to the Hemingway substation near Boise, Idaho (a joint project), expected to be placed in-service in 2026; (h) the 14-mile, 345-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Oquirrh substation and the Terminal substation, expected to be placed in-service in 2024; and (i) remaining segments that are expected to be placed in-service in future years, depending on load growth, economic analysis, IRP results, siting, permitting and construction schedules. The transmission line segments are intended to: (a) address customer load growth; (b) improve system reliability; (c) reduce transmission system constraints; (d) provide access to diverse generation resources, including renewable and zero carbon resources; and (e) improve the flow of electricity throughout PacifiCorp's six-state service area. Proposed transmission line segments are evaluated to ensure optimal benefits and timing before committing to move forward with permitting and construction. Through December 31, 2017, $1.92022, $3.8 billion had been spent and $1.6$2.3 billion, including AFUDC, had been placed in-service.


Future Generation, Conservation and Energy Efficiency


Integrated Resource PlanEnergy Supply Planning


As required by certain state regulations, PacifiCorp uses an IRP to develop a long-term resource plan to ensure that PacifiCorp can continue to provide reliable and cost-effective electric service to its customers while maintaining compliance with existing and evolving environmental laws and regulations. The IRP process identifies the amount and timing of PacifiCorp's expected future resource needs, accounting for planning uncertainty, risks, reliability, state energy policies and other factors. The IRP is prepared following a public process, which provides an opportunity for stakeholders to participate in PacifiCorp's resource planning process. PacifiCorp files its IRP on a biennial basisbiennially with the state commissions in each of the six states where PacifiCorp operates. Five states indicate whether the IRP meets the state commission's IRP standards and guidelines, a process referred to as "acknowledgment" in some states. Acknowledgment by a state commission does not address recovery or prudency of resources ultimately selected.


In April 2017,September 2021, PacifiCorp filed its 20172021 IRP with its state commissions.commissions and subsequently filed its 2021 IRP Update in March and April 2022. In March 2022, the OPUC acknowledged PacifiCorp's 2021 IRP and its preferred portfolio. In June 2022, the UPSC issued an order declining to acknowledge the 2021 IRP due to its determination that PacifiCorp did not meet the commission's IRP guidelines by excluding new natural gas-fueled resources in its modeling of the 2021 IRP's preferred portfolio, as well as the commission's view that PacifiCorp did not provide ample time for public input and information exchange during the development of the IRP. The UPSC did approve the 2022 All Source RFP ("2022AS RFP") to procure resources identified in the 2021 IRP. In August 2022, the IPUC acknowledged PacifiCorp's 2021 IRP and its preferred portfolio. Reviews of the 2021 IRP by the WPSC and the WUTC are ongoing.

The 2021 IRP includes investments in new renewable energy resources, upgradesnew battery storage resources, expanded transmission investments and advanced nuclear resources. New renewable energy resources in the IRP include more than 1,800 MWs of new wind-powered generation, over 2,100 MWs of new solar-powered generation and nearly 700 MWs of new battery storage capacity by 2025. The IRP also outlines PacifiCorp's plan to the existing wind fleet, and energy efficiency measuresretire or convert to meet future customer needs. On December 11, 2017, the OPUC acknowledged PacifiCorp's 2017 IRP.natural gas all coal-fueled resources by 2042.



Requests for Proposals


PacifiCorp issues individual Request for Proposals ("RFP"),RFPs, each of which typically focuses on a specific category of generation resources consistent with the IRP or other customer-driven demands. The IRP and the RFPs provide for the identification and staged procurement of resources to meet load or renewable portfolio standard requirements.and state specific compliance obligations. Depending upon the specific RFP, applicable laws and regulations may require PacifiCorp to file draft RFPs with the UPSC, the OPUC and the WUTC. Approval by the UPSC, the OPUC or the WUTC may be required depending on the nature of the RFPs.


As required
9


A draft of PacifiCorp's 2022AS RFP was approved by applicable lawsthe WUTC in March 2022 and regulations, PacifiCorp filed its draft 2017R RFP withby the UPSC in June 2017 and with the OPUC in August 2017. The UPSC and the OPUC approved PacifiCorp's 2017R RFP in September 2017.April 2022. The 2017R2022AS RFP was subsequently releasedissued to the market on September 27, 2017. The 2017R RFP sought upin April 2022. PacifiCorp-owned bids were due late November 2022 and market bids are due February 2023. PacifiCorp expects to 1,270 MW of new wind resources that can interconnect to PacifiCorp's transmission system in Wyoming onceprovide a proposed high-voltage transmission line is constructed. The 2017R RFP sought proposals for wind resources located outside of Wyoming capable of delivering all-in economic benefits for PacifiCorp's customers. The proposed high-voltage transmission line and new wind resources must be placed in service by December 31, 2020, to maximize potential federal production tax credit benefits for PacifiCorp's customers. Bids were received in October 2017 and best-and-final pricing, reflecting changes in federal tax law, was received in December 2017. PacifiCorp finalized its bid-selection process and established arecommended final shortlist in February 2018. PacifiCorp has identified four winning wind resource bids from this solicitation totaling 1,311 MWs, consisting of 1,111 MWs ownedfor state commission and 200 MW as a power-purchase agreement.independent evaluator consideration by late June 2023.


PacifiCorp released the 2017S RFP to the market on November 15, 2017. The 2017S RFP is seeking bids for new solar resources that can deliver energy and capacity to PacifiCorp's transmission system that provide net benefits for customers. The 2017S RFP is open to bidders offering power purchase agreements for new solar facilities sized between 10 and 300 MW. Bids were due in December 2017, and best-and-final pricing was received in February 2018. PacifiCorp is currently finalizing its bid-selection process and is on track to establish a final shortlist in March 2018.Energy Efficiency Programs

Utah Subscriber Solar Program

In October 2015, the UPSC approved the Utah Subscriber Solar Program that allows Utah customers to meet a portion or all of their energy requirements from Utah-based solar photovoltaic resources. The program is an alternative for customers who are unable or do not want to install solar on their property. Residential and small commercial participants are able to subscribe in 200 kilowatt-hour blocks up to their total annual average usage. Large commercial and industrial participants are able to subscribe in 1 kilowatt blocks up to their total annual average usage. As part of the program, PacifiCorp issued a 2015 Solar RFP to seek solar photovoltaic resources up to 20 MW sited in Utah. The contract for the solar resource was executed in January 2016 and the project was operational in December 2016. During the first six months of production, the program maintained a subscription effective rate above 94%, and has been 100% sold out since August 2017. A waitlist of customers has started to build and PacifiCorp is working on a potential second RFP to expand the program offering. The program received a Green Power Leadership Award in October 2017, from the Center for Resource Solutions, which was presented at the Renewable Energy Markets conference in New York City.

Demand-side Management


PacifiCorp has provided its customers with a comprehensive set of DSM programs to its customers since the 1970s. The programs are designed to reduce energy consumption and more effectively manage when energy is used, including management of seasonal peak loads. PacifiCorp offers services to customers such as energy engineering audits and information on how to improve the efficiency of their homes and businesses. To assist customers in investing in energy efficiency, PacifiCorp offers rebates or incentives encouraging the purchase and installation of high-efficiency equipment such as lighting, heating and cooling equipment, weatherization, motors, process equipment and systems, as well as incentives for energy project management, efficient building operations and efficient construction. Incentives are also paid to solicit participation in load management programs by residential, business and agricultural customers through programs such as PacifiCorp's residential and small commercial air conditioner load control program, battery control program and irrigation equipment load control programs. Although subject to prudence reviews, state regulations allow for contemporaneous recovery of costs incurred for the DSM programs through state-specific energy efficiency surcharges to retail customers or for recovery of costs through rates. During 2017,2022, PacifiCorp spent $139$167 million on these DSM programs, resulting in an estimated 669,876 MWh514,928 MWhs of first-year energy savings and an estimated 301 MW432 MWs of peak load management. In 2017, PacifiCorp began amortizing Utah DSM program costs over a 10-year period as a result of the approved Senate Bill 115, "Sustainable Transportation and Energy Plan Act." In addition to these DSM programs, PacifiCorp has load curtailment contracts with a number of large industrial customers that deliver up to 305 MW372 MWs of load reduction when needed, depending on the customers' actual loads. Recovery of the costsoperations. Costs associated with the large industrial load managementcurtailment program are captured in the respective customers' retail special contract agreements with those customerscontracts. The corresponding recovery of costs was approved by theirthe respective state commissions or through PacifiCorp's general rate case process.


Human Capital

Employees


As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp had approximately 5,5004,800 employees, of which approximately 3,20057% were covered by union contracts, principally with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the Utility Workers Union of America and the International Brotherhood of Boilermakers. For more information regarding PacifiCorp's human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING AND MIDAMERICAN ENERGY


General

MidAmerican Funding is an Iowa limited liability company whose sole member is BHE. and MHC

MidAmerican Funding, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is a holding company headquartered in Iowa that owns all of the outstanding common stock of MHC Inc. ("MHC"), which is a holding company owning all of the common stock of MidAmerican Energy;Energy and Midwest Capital Group, Inc. ("Midwest Capital"); and MEC Construction Services Co. ("MEC Construction"). MidAmerican Energy is a public utility company headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa, and incorporated in the state of Iowa. MidAmerican Funding and MidAmerican Energy are indirect consolidated subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway.

MidAmerican Funding and MHC

MidAmerican Funding conducts no business other than activities related to its debt securities and the ownership of MHC. MHC conducts no business other than the ownership of its subsidiaries and related corporate services.subsidiaries. MidAmerican Energy accounts for the predominant partis a substantial portion of MidAmerican Funding's and MHC's assets, revenue and earnings. Financial information on

MidAmerican Funding's segments of business is in Note 20Funding was formed as a limited liability company under the laws of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statementsstate of MidAmerican FundingIowa in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

MidAmerican Funding's1999 and its principal executive offices are located at 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 500, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580 and its telephone number is (515) 242-4300. MidAmerican Funding was formed as a limited liability company in 1999 under the laws of the state of Iowa.


10


MidAmerican Energy

General


MidAmerican Energy, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is a United StatesU.S. regulated electric and natural gas utility company headquartered in Iowa that serves 0.8 million retail electric customers in portions of Iowa, Illinois and South Dakota and 0.8 million retail and transportation natural gas customers in portions of Iowa, South Dakota, Illinois and Nebraska. MidAmerican Energy is principally engaged in the business of generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electricity and in distributing, selling and transporting natural gas. MidAmerican Energy's service territory covers approximately 11,000 square miles. Metropolitan areas in which MidAmerican Energy distributes electricity at retail include Council Bluffs, Des Moines, Fort Dodge, Iowa City, Sioux City and Waterloo, Iowa; and the Quad Cities (Davenport and Bettendorf, Iowa and Rock Island, Moline and East Moline, Illinois). Metropolitan areas in which it distributes natural gas at retail include Cedar Rapids, Des Moines, Fort Dodge, Iowa City, Sioux City and Waterloo, Iowa; the Quad Cities; and Sioux Falls, South Dakota. MidAmerican Energy has a diverse customer base consisting of urban and rural residential customers and a variety of commercial and industrial customers. Principal industries served by MidAmerican Energy include electronic data storage; processing and sales of food products; manufacturing, processing and fabrication of primary metals, farm and other non-electrical machinery; cement and gypsum products; and government. In addition to retail sales and natural gas transportation, MidAmerican Energy sells electricity principally to markets operated by RTOs and natural gas to other utilities and market participants on a wholesale basis. MidAmerican Energy is a transmission-owning member of the MISO and participates in its capacity, energy and ancillary services markets.


MidAmerican Energy's regulated electric and natural gas operations are conducted under numerous franchise agreements, certificates, permits and licenses obtained from federal, state and local authorities. The franchise agreements, with various expiration dates, are typically for 20- to 25-year terms. Several of these franchise agreements give either party the right to seek amendment to the franchise agreement at one or two specified times during the term. MidAmerican Energy generally has an exclusive right to serve electric customers within its service territories and, in turn, has an obligation to provide electricity service to those customers. In return, the state utility commissions have established rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow MidAmerican Energy an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its investment. In Illinois, MidAmerican Energy's regulated retail electric customers may choose their energy supplier.


Prior to 2016, MidAmerican Energy also had nonregulated business activities consisting predominantly of competitive electricity and natural gas retail sales. On January 1, 2016, MidAmerican Energy transferred the assets and liabilities of its unregulated retail services business to MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, a subsidiary of BHE.

MidAmerican Energy's monthly net income is affected by the seasonal impact of weather on electricity and natural gas sales, seasonal retail electricity prices and the timing of recognition of federal renewable electricity production tax credits related to MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities. For 2017, 82% of MidAmerican Energy's annual net income was recorded in the months of June through September.

Financial information on MidAmerican Energy's segments of business is disclosed in MidAmerican Energy's Note 20 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

The percentages of MidAmerican Energy's operating revenue and operating income derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 were as follows:follows (dollars in millions):

2017 2016 2015202220212020
Operating revenue:     Operating revenue:
Regulated electric75% 76% 74%Regulated electric$2,988 74 %$2,529 71 %$2,139 79 %
Regulated gas25
 24
 26
Regulated gas1,030 26 1,003 28 573 21 
100% 100% 100%
OtherOther— 15 — 
Total operating revenueTotal operating revenue$4,025 100 %$3,547 100 %$2,720 100 %
     
Operating income:     Operating income:
Regulated electric86% 88% 86%Regulated electric$372 85 %$358 86 %$384 86 %
Regulated gas14
 12
 14
Regulated gas66 15 58 14 64 14 
100% 100% 100%
Total operating incomeTotal operating income$438 100 %$416 100 %$448 100 %


MidAmerican Energy's principal executive offices are located at 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 500, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580 and its telephone number is (515) 242-4300. MidAmerican Energy was incorporated under the laws of the state of Iowa as part of the July 1,in 1995 merger of Iowa-Illinois Gas and Electric Company, Midwest Resources Inc.its principal executive offices are located at 666 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580, its telephone number is (515) 242-4300 and Midwest Power Systems Inc. On December 1, 1996, MidAmerican Energy became, through a corporate reorganization, a wholly owned subsidiary of MHC Inc., formerly known as MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company.its internet address is www.midamericanenergy.com.


11


Regulated Electric Operations


Customers


The GWhGWhs and percentages of electricity sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail customers by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Iowa27,024 92 %25,909 92 %24,425 92 %
Illinois1,970 1,895 1,847 
South Dakota296 270 251 
29,290 100 %28,074 100 %26,523 100 %
 2017 2016 2015
            
Iowa22,365
 91% 21,766
 91% 20,922
 90%
Illinois1,891
 8
 1,940
 8
 1,903
 9
South Dakota236
 1
 218
 1
 217
 1
 24,492
 100% 23,924
 100% 23,042
 100%



Electricity sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
GWhs sold:
Residential7,006 15 %6,718 15 %6,687 18 %
Commercial4,017 3,841 3,707 10 
Industrial16,646 35 15,944 36 14,645 39 
Other1,621 1,571 1,484 
Total retail29,290 62 28,074 64 26,523 71 
Wholesale17,964 38 16,011 36 11,219 29 
Total GWhs sold47,254 100 %44,085 100 %37,742 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential697 86 %690 86 %682 86 %
Commercial99 12 98 12 97 12 
Industrial— — — 
Other15 14 14 
Total813 100 %804 100 %795 100 %
 2017 2016 2015
GWh sold:           
Residential6,207
 18% 6,408
 20% 6,166
 19%
Commercial3,761
 11
 3,812
 12
 3,806
 12
Industrial12,957
 39
 12,115
 37
 11,487
 36
Other1,567
 5
 1,589
 5
 1,583
 5
Total retail24,492
 73
 23,924
 74
 23,042
 72
Wholesale9,165
 27
 8,489
 26
 8,741
 28
Total GWh sold33,657
 100% 32,413
 100% 31,783
 100%
            
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):           
Residential662
 86% 653
 86% 646
 86%
Commercial92
 12
 91
 12
 90
 12
Industrial2
 
 2
 
 2
 
Other14
 2
 14
 2
 14
 2
Total770
 100% 760
 100% 752
 100%


Variations in weather, economic conditions and various conservation and energy efficiency measures and programs can impact customer usage.energy requirements. Wholesale sales are primarily impacted by market prices for energy relative to the incremental cost to generate power.energy.


There are seasonal variations in MidAmerican Energy's electricity sales that are principally related to weather and the related use of electricity for air conditioning. Additionally, electricity sales are priced higher in the summer months compared to the remaining months of the year. As a result, 40% to 50% of MidAmerican Energy's regulated electric retail revenue is reported in the months of June, July, August and September.


A degree of concentration of sales exists with certain large electric retail customers. Sales to the ten10 largest customers, from a variety of industries, comprised 19%25%, 16%24% and 15%23% of total retail electric sales in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Sales to electronic data storage customers included in the ten10 largest customers comprised 9%18%, 7%16% and 5%16% of total retail electric sales in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


The annual hourly peak demand on MidAmerican Energy's electric system usually occurs as a result of air conditioning use during the cooling season. Peak demand represents the highest demand on a given day and at a given hour. On July 19, 2017,August 2, 2022, retail customer usage of electricity caused a new record hourly peak demand of 4,850 MW5,386 MWs on MidAmerican Energy's electric distribution system, which is 98 MW150 MWs greater than the previous record hourly peak demand of 4,752 MW5,236 MWs set July 19, 2011.June 17, 2021.



12


Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply


MidAmerican Energy has ownership interest in a diverse portfolio of generating facilities. The following table presents certain information regarding MidAmerican Energy's owned generating facilities as of December 31, 2017:2022:
FacilityNet
Year Installed /Net CapacityOwned Capacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy Source
Repowered(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
WIND:
Ida GroveIda Grove, IAWind2016-2019500 500 
OrientGreenfield, IAWind2018-2019500 500 
HighlandPrimghar, IAWind2015475 475 
Rolling HillsMassena, IAWind2011 / 2022443 443 
Beaver CreekOgden, IAWind2017-2018340 340 
North EnglishMontezuma, IAWind2018-2019340 340 
Palo AltoPalo Alto, IAWind2019-2020340 340 
Arbor HillGreenfield, IAWind2018-2020316 316 
PomeroyPomeroy, IAWind2007-2011 / 2018-2019, 2021286 286 
Diamond TrailLadora, IAWind2020250 250 
LundgrenOtho, IAWind2014250 250 
O'BrienPrimghar, IAWind2016250 250 
Southern HillsOrient, IAWind2020-2021250 250 
CenturyBlairsburg, IAWind2005-2008 / 2017-2018200 200 
EclipseAdair, IAWind2012 / 2022200 200 
PlymouthRemsen, IAWind2021200 200 
IntrepidSchaller, IAWind2004-2005 / 2017176 176 
AdairAdair, IAWind2008 / 2019-2020175 175 
PrairieMontezuma, IAWind2017-2018169 169 
CarrollCarroll, IAWind2008 / 2019150 150 
WalnutWalnut, IAWind2008 / 2019150 150 
ViennaGladbrook, IAWind2012-2013150 150 
AdamsLennox, IAWind2015150 150 
WellsburgWellsburg, IAWind2014139 139 
LaurelLaurel, IAWind2011 / 2022120 120 
MacksburgMacksburg, IAWind2014119 119 
ContrailBraddyville, IAWind2020110 110 
Morning LightAdair, IAWind2012 / 2022100 100 
VictoryWestside, IAWind2006 / 2017-201899 99 
IvesterWellsburg, IAWind201890 90 
Pocahontas PrairiePomeroy, IAWind2020 / 202180 80 
Charles CityCharles City, IAWind2008 / 201875 75 
7,192 7,192 
COAL:
LouisaMuscatine, IACoal1983747 657 
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 3Council Bluffs, IACoal1978702 555 
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 4Council Bluffs, IACoal2007806 481 
OttumwaOttumwa, IACoal1981706 367 
George Neal Unit No. 3Sergeant Bluff, IACoal1975504 363 
George Neal Unit No. 4Salix, IACoal1979640 260 
4,105 2,683 
NATURAL GAS AND OTHER:
Greater Des MoinesPleasant Hill, IAGas2003-2004511 511 
ElectrifarmWaterloo, IAGas or Oil1975-1978178 178 
Pleasant HillPleasant Hill, IAGas or Oil1990-1994155 155 
SycamoreJohnston, IAGas or Oil1974149 149 
13


      Year Facility Net Net Owned
Generating Facility Location Energy Source Installed 
Capacity (MW)(1)
 
Capacity (MW)(1)
WIND:          
Intrepid Schaller, IA Wind 2004-2005 176
 176
Century Blairsburg, IA Wind 2005-2008 200
 200
Victory Westside, IA Wind 2006 99
 99
Pomeroy Pomeroy, IA Wind 2007-2011 286
 286
Adair Adair, IA Wind 2008 175
 175
Carroll Carroll, IA Wind 2008 150
 150
Charles City Charles City, IA Wind 2008 75
 75
Walnut Walnut, IA Wind 2008 150
 150
Laurel Laurel, IA Wind 2011 120
 120
Rolling Hills Massena, IA Wind 2011 443
 443
Eclipse Adair, IA Wind 2012 200
 200
Morning Light Adair, IA Wind 2012 100
 100
Vienna Gladbrook, IA Wind 2012-2013 150
 150
Lundgren Otho, IA Wind 2014 250
 250
Macksburg Macksburg, IA Wind 2014 119
 119
Wellsburg Wellsburg, IA Wind 2014 139
 139
Adams Lennox, IA Wind 2015 150
 150
Highland Primghar, IA Wind 2015 475
 475
Ida Grove Ida Grove, IA Wind 2016 300
 300
O'Brien Primghar, IA Wind 2016 250
 250
Beaver Creek Ogden, IA Wind 2017 170
 170
Prairie Montezuma, IA Wind 2017 164
 164
        4,341
 4,341
COAL:          
Louisa Muscatine, IA Coal 1983 744
 655
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 3 Council Bluffs, IA Coal 1978 712
 563
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 4 Council Bluffs, IA Coal 2007 810
 483
Ottumwa Ottumwa, IA Coal 1981 730
 380
George Neal Unit No. 3 Sergeant Bluff, IA Coal 1975 512
 368
George Neal Unit No. 4 Salix, IA Coal 1979 663
 269
        4,171
 2,718
NATURAL GAS AND OTHER:          
Greater Des Moines Pleasant Hill, IA Gas 2003-2004 488
 488
Electrifarm Waterloo, IA Gas or Oil 1975-1978 182
 182
Pleasant Hill Pleasant Hill, IA Gas or Oil 1990-1994 167
 167
Sycamore Johnston, IA Gas or Oil 1974 148
 148
River Hills Des Moines, IA Gas 1966-1967 113
 113
Riverside Unit No. 5 Bettendorf, IA Gas 1961 113
 113
Coralville Coralville, IA Gas 1970 63
 63
Moline Moline, IL Gas 1970 61
 61
28 portable power modules Various Oil 2000 56
 56
Parr Charles City, IA Gas 1969 33
 33
        1,424
 1,424
NUCLEAR:          
Quad Cities Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Cordova, IL Uranium 1972 1,820
 455
           
HYDROELECTRIC:          
Moline Unit Nos. 1-4 Moline, IL Hydroelectric 1941 4
 4
           
Total Available Generating Capacity     11,760
 8,942
           
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION        
Various wind projects       1,666
 1,666
    13,426
 10,608
FacilityNet
Year Installed /Net CapacityOwned Capacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy Source
Repowered(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
River HillsDes Moines, IAGas1966-1967118 118 
CoralvilleCoralville, IAGas197062 62 
MolineMoline, ILGas197060 60 
27 portable power modulesVariousOil200054 54 
ParrCharles City, IAGas196933 33 
1,320 1,320 
NUCLEAR:
Quad Cities Unit Nos. 1 and 2Cordova, ILUranium19721,822 455 
SOLAR:
Holliday CreekFort Dodge, IASolar2022100 100 
Arbor HillAdair, IASolar202224 24 
FranklinHampton, IASolar2022
NealSalix, IASolar2022
WaterlooWaterloo, IASolar2022
HillsHills, IASolar2022
141 141 
HYDROELECTRIC:
Moline Unit Nos. 1-4Moline, ILHydroelectric1941
Total Available Generating Capacity14,584 11,795 

(1)Repowered dates are associated with component replacements on existing wind-powered generating facilities commonly referred to by the IRS as repowering. IRS rules provide for re-establishment of the PTCs for an existing wind-powered generating facility upon the replacement of a significant portion of its components. If the degree of component replacement in such projects meets IRS guidelines, PTCs are re-established for 10 years at rates that depend upon the date on which construction begins.

(2)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates MidAmerican Energy's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
(1)
Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MW) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates MidAmerican Energy's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
The following table shows the percentages of MidAmerican Energy's total energy supplied by energy source for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Wind and other renewable(1)
58 %52 %54 %
Coal21 27 19 
Nuclear10 
Natural gas
Total energy generated90 91 85 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other14 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
100 %100 %100 %
(1)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.

14

 2017 2016 2015
      
Coal40% 39% 48%
Nuclear11
 12
 12
Natural gas1
 2
 1
Wind and other(1)
38
 35
 29
Total energy generated90
 88
 90
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other8
 10
 8
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
1
 1
 1
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)1
 1
 1
 100% 100% 100%


(1)
All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these generating facilities and purchases may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of renewable energy credits or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.

MidAmerican Energy is required to have accredited resources available for dispatch by MISO to continuously meet its customercustomer's needs and reliably operate its electric system. The percentage of MidAmerican Energy's energy supplied by energy source varies from year to year and is subject to numerous operational and economic factors such as planned and unplanned outages, fuel commodity prices, fuel transportation costs, weather, environmental considerations, transmission constraints, and wholesale market prices of electricity. MidAmerican Energy evaluates these factors continuously in order to facilitate economicaleconomic dispatch of its generating facilities.facilities by MISO. When factors for one energy source are less favorable, MidAmerican Energy places more reliance on other energy sources. For example, MidAmerican Energy can generate more electricity using its low cost wind-powered generating facilities when factors associated with these facilities are favorable. When factors associated with wind resources are less favorable, MidAmerican Energy must increase its reliance on more expensive generation or purchased electricity. Refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of energy cost recovery by jurisdiction.


CoalWind


MidAmerican Energy owns more wind-powered generating capacity than any other U.S. rate-regulated electric utility and believes wind-powered generation offers a viable, economical and environmentally prudent means of supplying electricity and complying with laws and regulations. Pursuant to ratemaking principles approved by the IUB, facilities accounting for 92% of MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating capacity in-service at December 31, 2022, are authorized to earn over their regulatory lives a fixed rate of return on equity ranging from 11.0% to 12.2% on the depreciated cost of their original construction, which excludes the cost of later replacements, in any future Iowa rate proceeding. MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities, including those facilities where a significant portion of the equipment was replaced, commonly referred to as repowered facilities, are eligible for federal renewable electricity PTCs for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service. PTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-powered generating facilities is produced and sold. PTCs for MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities currently in-service began expiring in 2014, with final expiration in 2032. Since 2014, MidAmerican Energy has repowered, or plans to repower, 2,204 MWs of wind-powered generating facilities for which PTCs had expired by the end of 2022.

Of the 7,414 MWs (nameplate capacity) of wind-powered generating facilities in-service as of December 31, 2022, 7,249 MWs were generating PTCs, including 2,310 MWs of repowered facilities. PTCs earned by MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service prior to 2013, except for repowered facilities, were included in MidAmerican Energy's Iowa EAC, through which MidAmerican Energy is allowed to recover fluctuations in its electric retail energy costs. All of the eligibility of those facilities to earn PTCs had expired by the end of 2022. MidAmerican Energy earned PTCs totaling $710 million, $574 million and $510 million in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of which 4%, 12% and 15%, respectively, were included in the Iowa EAC.

Coal

All of the coal-fueled generating facilities operated by MidAmerican Energy are fueled by low-sulfur, western coal from the Powder River Basin in northeast Wyoming. MidAmerican Energy's coal supply portfolio includes multiple suppliers and mines under short-term and multi-year agreements of varying terms and quantities through 2019.2027. MidAmerican Energy believes supplies from these sources are presently adequate and available to meet MidAmerican Energy's needs. MidAmerican Energy's coal supply portfolio has substantially all of its expected 20182023 and a majority of 2024 requirements under fixed-price contracts. MidAmerican Energy regularly monitors the western coal market for opportunities to enhance its coal supply portfolio.


MidAmerican Energy has a multi-year long-haul coal transportation agreement with BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF"), an affiliate company, for the delivery of coal to all of the MidAmerican Energy-operated coal-fueled generating facilities other than the George Neal Energy Center. Under this agreement, BNSF delivers coal directly to MidAmerican Energy's Walter Scott, Jr. Energy Center and to an interchange point with Canadian Pacific Railway Company for short-haul delivery to the Louisa Energy Center. MidAmerican Energy has a multi-year long-haul coal transportation agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company for the delivery of coal to the George Neal Energy Center.



15


Nuclear


MidAmerican Energy is a 25% joint owner of Quad Cities Generating Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station"), a nuclear power plant. Exelongenerating facility, which is currently licensed by the NRC for operation until December 14, 2032. Constellation Energy Generation, Company, LLC ("Exelon Generation"Constellation Energy"), a subsidiary of Exelon Corporation, is the 75% joint owner and the operator of Quad Cities Station. Approximately one-third of the nuclear fuel assemblies in each reactor core at Quad Cities Station is replaced every 24 months. MidAmerican Energy has been advised by Exelon Generation that the following requirements for Quad Cities Station can be met under existing supplies or commitments: uranium requirements through 2021 and partial requirements through 2025; uranium conversion requirements through 2021 and partial requirements through 2025; enrichment requirements through 2021 and partial requirements through 2025; and fuel fabrication requirements through 2022. MidAmericanConstellation Energy has been advised by Exelon Generation that it does not anticipate it will have difficulty in contracting forobtaining the necessary uranium uraniumconcentrates or conversion, enrichment or fabrication ofservices to meet the nuclear fuel neededrequirements of Quad Cities Station. In reaction to operateconcerns about the profitability of Quad Cities Station during these time periods.and Constellation Energy's ability to continue its operation, in December 2016, Illinois passed legislation creating a zero emission standard, which went into effect June 1, 2017. The zero emission standard requires the Illinois Power Agency to purchase ZECs and recover the costs from certain ratepayers in Illinois, subject to certain limitations. Currently, Quad Cities is operating under agreements to provide Illinois load serving entities ZECs through June 1, 2027.

Natural Gas and Other


MidAmerican Energy uses natural gas and oil as fuel for intermediate and peak demand electric generation, igniter fuel, transmission support and standby purposes. These sources are presently in adequate supply and available to meet MidAmerican Energy's needs.


Wind and OtherRegional Transmission Organizations

MidAmerican Energy owns more wind-powered generating capacity than any other United States rate-regulated electric utility and believes wind-powered generation offers a viable, economical and environmentally prudent means of supplying electricity and complying with laws and regulations. Pursuant to ratemaking principles approved by the IUB, all of MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities in-service at December 31, 2017, are authorized to earn over their regulatory lives a fixed rate of return on equity ranging from 11.0% to 12.2% on the cost of their original construction, which excludes the cost of later replacements, in any future Iowa rate proceeding. MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities, including those facilities where a significant portion of the equipment was replaced, commonly referred to as repowered facilities, are eligible for federal renewable electricity production tax credits for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service. Production tax credits for MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities currently in-service, began expiring in 2014, with final expiration in 2027. In 2017, certain of MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities for which production tax credits had previously expired were repowered.

Of the 4,388 MW (nominal ratings) of wind-powered generating facilities in-service as of December 31, 2017, 3,642 MW were generating production tax credits. Production tax credits earned by MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service prior to 2013, except for facilities that have been repowered, are included in ECAMs, through which MidAmerican Energy is allowed to recover fluctuations in its electric retail energy costs. Facilities earning production tax credits that currently benefit customers through ECAMs totaled 1,624 MW (nominal ratings) as of December 31, 2017. In 2017, MidAmerican Energy earned $287 million of production tax credits, 47% of which was included in ECAMs.


MidAmerican Energy sells and purchases electricity and ancillary services related to its generation and load in wholesale markets pursuant to the tariffs in those markets. MidAmerican Energy participates predominantly in the MISO energy and ancillary service markets, which provide MidAmerican Energy with wholesale opportunities over a large market area. MidAmerican Energy can enter into wholesale bilateral transactions in addition to market activity related to its assets. MidAmerican Energy is also authorized to participate in the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ("PJM") markets and can contract with several other major transmission-owning utilities in the region. MidAmerican Energy can utilize bothutilizes financial swaps and physical fixed-price electricity sales and purchases contracts to reduce its exposure to electricity price volatility.


MidAmerican Energy's total net generating capability accrediteddecisions regarding additions to or reductions of its generation portfolio may be impacted by the MISO's minimum reserve margin requirement. The MISO requires each member to maintain a minimum reserve margin of its accredited generating capacity over its peak demand obligation based on the member's load forecast filed with the MISO each year. The MISO's reserve requirement was 8.7% for the summer of 20172022. MidAmerican Energy's owned and contracted capacity accredited for the 2022-2023 MISO capacity auction was 5,410 MW5,591 MWs compared to a 2017 summer peak demand obligation of 4,850 MW.5,078 MWs, or a reserve margin of 10.1%. Beginning with the 2023-2024 planning year, the MISO will implement a seasonal construct requiring each member to maintain a minimum seasonal reserve margin of its accredited generating capacity over its seasonal peak demand obligation based on the member's seasonal load forecast filed with the MISO each year. The reserve requirements for the 2023-2024 planning year will be 7.4% for summer 2023, 14.9% for fall 2023, 25.5% for winter 2023-2024 and 24.5% for spring 2024. Accredited net generating capabilitycapacity represents the amount of generation available to meet the requirements of MidAmerican Energy's retail customers and consists of MidAmerican Energy-owned generation, interruptible retail customer load, certain customer private generation that MidAmerican Energy is contractually allowed to dispatch and the net amount of capacity purchases and sales.sales, excluding sales into the MISO annual capacity auction. Accredited capacity may vary significantly from the nominal or design, capacity ratings, particularly for wind turbinesor solar facilities whose output is dependent upon wind levelsenergy resource availability at any given time. Additionally, the actual amount of generating capacity available at any time may be less than the accredited capacity due to regulatory restrictions, transmission constraints, fuel restrictions and generating units being temporarily out of service for inspection, maintenance, refueling, modifications or other reasons. MidAmerican Energy's accredited capability currently exceeds the MISO's minimum requirements.



16


Transmission and Distribution


MidAmerican Energy's transmission and distribution systems included 4,0004,600 circuit miles of transmission lines in four states, 37,50025,400 circuit miles of distribution lines and 380345 substations as of December 31, 2017.2022. Electricity from MidAmerican Energy's generating facilities and purchased electricity is delivered to wholesale markets and its retail customers via the transmission facilities of MidAmerican Energy and others. MidAmerican Energy participates in the MISO capacity, energy and ancillary services markets as a transmission-owning member and, accordingly, operates its transmission assets at the direction of the MISO. The MISO manages its energy and ancillary service markets using reliability-constrained economic dispatch of the region's generation. For both the day-ahead and real-time (every five minutes) markets, the MISO analyzes generation commitments to provide market liquidity and transparent pricing while maintaining transmission system reliability by minimizing congestion and maximizing efficient energy transmission. Additionally, through its FERC-approved open access transmission tariff ("OATT"),OATT, the MISO performs the role of transmission service provider throughout the MISO footprint and administers the long-term planning function. The MISO and related costs of the participants are shared among the participants through a number of mechanisms in accordance with the MISO tariff.


Regulated Natural Gas Operations


MidAmerican Energy is engaged in the procurement, transportation, storage and distribution of natural gas forto customers in its service territory.territory and the related procurement, transportation and storage of natural gas for the benefit of those customers. MidAmerican Energy purchases natural gas from various suppliers and contracts with interstate natural gas pipelines for transportation of the gas to MidAmerican Energy's service territory and for storage and balancing services. MidAmerican Energy sells natural gas and delivery services to end-use customers on its distribution system; sells natural gas to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies; and transports natural gas through its distribution system for end-use customers who have independently secured their supply of natural gas. During 2017, 55%2022, 54% of the total natural gas delivered through MidAmerican Energy's distribution system was associated with transportation service.


Natural gas property consists primarily of natural gas mains and servicesservice lines, meters, and related distribution equipment, including feeder lines to communities served from natural gas pipelines owned by others. The natural gas distribution facilities of MidAmerican Energy included 23,50024,600 miles of natural gas main and service lines as of December 31, 2017.2022.


Customer Usage and Seasonality


The percentages of natural gas sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail customers by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Iowa76 %76 %76 %
South Dakota14 13 13 
Illinois10 10 
Nebraska
100 %100 %100 %

17

 2017 2016 2015
      
Iowa76% 76% 76%
South Dakota13
 13
 13
Illinois10
 10
 10
Nebraska1
 1
 1
 100% 100% 100%



The percentages of natural gas sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer, total DthDths of natural gas sold, total DthDths of transportation service and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Residential47 %44 %45 %
Commercial(1)
22 20 20 
Industrial(1)
Total retail74 69 70 
Wholesale(2)
26 31 30 
100 %100 %100 %
Total Dths of natural gas sold (in thousands)119,508111,916114,399
Total Dths of transportation service (in thousands)102,827112,631110,263
Total average number of retail customers (in thousands)789781774
 2017 2016 2015
      
Residential41% 41% 42%
Commercial(1)
20
 21
 21
Industrial(1)
4
 4
 5
Total retail65
 66
 68
Wholesale(2)
35
 34
 32
 100% 100% 100%
      
Total Dth of natural gas sold (in thousands)114,298
 113,294
 110,105
Total Dth of transportation service (in thousands)92,136
 83,610
 80,001
Total average number of retail customers (in thousands)751
 742
 733
(1)Commercial and industrial customers are classified primarily based on the nature of their business and natural gas usage. Commercial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas principally for heating. Industrial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas principally for their manufacturing processes.

(2)Wholesale sales are generally made to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies for eventual resale to end-use customers.
(1)
Commercial and industrial customers are classified primarily based on the nature of their business and natural gas usage. Commercial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas principally for heating. Industrial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas principally for their manufacturing processes.
(2)Wholesale sales are generally made to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies for eventual resale to end-use customers.


There are seasonal variations in MidAmerican Energy's regulated natural gas business that are principally due to the use of natural gas for heating. Typically, 50-60% of MidAmerican Energy's regulated retail natural gas revenue is reported in the months of January, February, March and December.


On January 6, 2014,29, 2019, MidAmerican Energy recorded its all-time highest peak-day delivery through its distribution system of 1,281,767 Dth.1,319,361 Dths. This peak-day delivery consisted of 69%68% traditional retail sales service and 31%32% transportation service. MidAmerican Energy's 2017/20182022/2023 winter heating season preliminary peak-day delivery as of February 2, 2018,2023, was 1,244,354 Dth1,311,920 Dths, reached on January 15, 2018.December 22, 2022. This preliminary peak-day delivery included 66%consisted of 71% traditional retail sales service and 34%29% transportation service.


FuelNatural Gas Supply and Capacity


MidAmerican Energy uses several strategies designed to maintain a reliable natural gas supply and reduce the impact of volatility in natural gas prices on its regulated retail natural gas customers. These strategies include the purchase of a geographically diverse supply portfolio from producers and third partythird-party energy marketing companies, the use of leasedinterstate pipeline storage services and MidAmerican Energy's LNG peaking facilities, and the use of financial derivatives to fix the price on a portion of the anticipated natural gas requirements of MidAmerican Energy's customers. Refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the purchased gas adjustment clauses ("PGA").PGAs.


MidAmerican Energy contracts for firm natural gas pipeline capacity to transport natural gas from key production areas and liquid market centers to its service territory through direct interconnects to the pipeline systems of several interstate natural gas pipeline systems, including Northern Natural Gas, an affiliate company. MidAmerican Energy has multiple pipeline interconnections into several larger markets within its distribution system. Multiple pipeline interconnections create competition among pipeline suppliers for transportation capacity to serve those markets, thus reducing costs. In addition, multiple pipeline interconnections increase delivery reliability and give MidAmerican Energy the ability to optimize delivery of the lowest cost supply from the various production areas and liquid market centers into these markets. Benefits to MidAmerican Energy's distribution system customers are shared among all jurisdictions through a consolidated PGA.


At times, the natural gas pipeline capacity available through MidAmerican Energy's firm capacity portfolio may exceed the requirements of retail customers on MidAmerican Energy's distribution system. Firm capacity in excess of MidAmerican Energy's system needs can be resoldreleased to other companies to achieve optimum use of the available capacity. Past IUB and South Dakota Public Utilities Commission ("SDPUC") rulings have allowed MidAmerican Energy to retain 30% of the respective jurisdictional revenue on the resold capacity, with the remaining 70% being returned to customers through the PGAs.



18


MidAmerican Energy utilizes interstate pipeline natural gas storage leased from the interstate pipelinesservices to meet retail customer requirements, manage fluctuations in demand due to changes in weather and other usage factors and manage variation in seasonal natural gas pricing. MidAmerican Energy typically withdraws natural gas from storage during the heating season when customer demand is historically at its peak and injects natural gas into storage during off-peak months when customer demand is historically lower. MidAmerican Energy also utilizes its three LNG facilities to meet peak day demands during the winter heating season. The leasedInterstate pipeline storage services and MidAmerican Energy's LNG facilities reduce MidAmerican Energy's dependence on natural gas purchases during the volatile winter heating season and can deliver a significant portion of MidAmerican Energy's anticipated retail sales requirements on a peak winter day. For MidAmerican Energy's 2017/20182022/2023 winter heating season preliminary peak-day of January 15, 2018,December 22, 2022, supply sources used to meet deliveries to traditional retail sales service customers included 53%54% from purchases delivered on interstate pipelines, 35% from interstate pipelines, 39% from leasedpipeline storage services and 8%11% from MidAmerican Energy's LNG facilities.


MidAmerican Energy attempts to optimize the value of its regulated transportation capacity, natural gas supply and leasedinterstate pipeline storage arrangementsservices by engaging in wholesale transactions. IUB and SDPUC rulings have allowed MidAmerican Energy to retain 50% of the respective jurisdictional margins earned on certain wholesale sales of natural gas, with the remaining 50% being returned to customers through the PGAs.


MidAmerican Energy is not aware of any factors that would cause material difficulties in meeting its anticipated retail customer demand under normal operating conditions for the foreseeable future.


Demand-side ManagementEnergy Efficiency Programs


MidAmerican Energy has provided a comprehensive set of DSMdemand- and energy-reduction programs to its Iowa electric and natural gas customers since 1990 and1990. The programs, collectively referred to customers in its other jurisdictions since 2008. Theas energy efficiency programs, are designed to reduce energy consumption and more effectively manage when energy is used, including management of seasonal peak loads. Current programs offer services to customers such as energy engineering audits and information on how to improve the efficiency of their homes and businesses. To assist customers in investing in energy efficiency, MidAmerican Energy offers rebates or incentives encouraging the purchase and installation of high-efficiency equipment such as lighting, heating and cooling equipment, weatherization, motors, process equipment and systems, as well as incentives for efficient construction. Incentives are also paid to residential customers who participate in the air conditioner load control program and nonresidential customers who participate in the nonresidential load management program. In Iowa, legislation passed in 2018 provides that projected cumulative average annual costs for a natural gas energy efficiency plan cannot exceed 1.5% of expected Iowa natural gas retail revenue and, for an electric demand response plan and separately for an electric energy efficiency plan other than demand response, cannot exceed 2.0% of expected annual Iowa electric retail revenue. Although subject to prudence reviews, state regulations allow for contemporaneous recovery of costs incurred for the DSMenergy efficiency programs through state-specific energy efficiency service charges paid by all retail electric and natural gas customers. In 2017, $1472022, $43 million was expensed for MidAmerican Energy's DSMenergy efficiency programs, which resulted in estimated first-year energy savings of 311,000 MWh133,000 MWhs of electricity and 774,000 Dth174,000 Dths of natural gas and an estimated peak load reduction of 464 MW384 MWs of electricity and 9,244 Dth2,444 Dths per day of natural gas.


Human Capital

Employees


All of MidAmerican Funding's employees are employed by MidAmerican Energy. As of December 31, 2017, MidAmerican Funding and its subsidiaries, which includes2022, MidAmerican Energy had approximately 3,3003,400 employees, of which approximately 1,400 were covered by union contracts. MidAmerican Energy has three separate contracts with locals of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers ("IBEW") and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union. A contract with the IBEWInternational Brotherhood of Electrical Workers covering substantially all of the union employees expires April 30, 2022.2027. For more information regarding MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.


19




NV ENERGY (NEVADA POWER AND SIERRA PACIFIC)


General


NV Energy, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, acquired on December 19, 2013, is an energy holding company headquartered in Nevada whose principal subsidiaries are Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are indirect consolidated subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway. Nevada Power is a United StatesU.S. regulated electric utility company serving 0.91.0 million retail customers primarily in the Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson and adjoining areas. Sierra Pacific is a United StatesU.S. regulated electric and natural gas utility company serving 0.30.4 million retail electric customers and 0.2 million retail and transportation natural gas customers in northern Nevada. The Nevada Utilities are principally engaged in the business of generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electricity and, in the case of Sierra Pacific, in distributing, selling and transporting natural gas. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific have electric service territories covering approximately 4,500 square miles and 41,20041,400 square miles, respectively. Sierra Pacific has a natural gas service territory covering approximately 900 square miles in Reno and Sparks. Principal industries served by the Nevada Utilities include gaming, recreation, warehousing, manufacturing and governmental.governmental services. Sierra Pacific also serves the mining industry. The Nevada Utilities buy and sell electricity on the wholesale market with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants to balance and optimize economic benefits of electricity generation, retail customer loads and wholesale transactions.


The Nevada Utilities' electric and natural gas operations are conducted under numerous nonexclusive franchise agreements, revocable permits and licenses obtained from federal, state and local authorities. The expiration of these franchise agreements, ranges from 2020 through 2032with various expiration dates, are typically for Nevada Power and 2018 through 2049 for Sierra Pacific.20- to 25-year terms. The Nevada Utilities operate under certificates of public convenience and necessity as regulated by the PUCN, and as such the Nevada Utilities have an obligation to provide electricity service to those customers within their service territory. In return, the PUCN has established rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow the Nevada Utilities an opportunity to recover all prudently incurred costs of providing services and an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on their investment.


NV Energy's monthly net income is affected by the seasonal impact of weather on electricity and natural gas sales and seasonal retail electricity prices from the Nevada Utilities'. For 2017, 82%2022, 78% of NV Energy annual net income was recorded in the months of June through September.


Regulated electric utility operationoperations is Nevada Power's only segment while regulated electric utility operations and regulated natural gas operations are the two segments of Sierra Pacific. Financial information on Sierra Pacific's segments of business is disclosed in Sierra Pacific's Note 15 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


The percentages of Sierra Pacific's operating revenue and operating income derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 were as follows:follows (dollars in millions):
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Electric$1,025 86 %$848 88 %$738 86 %
Gas168 14 117 12 116 14 
Total operating revenue$1,193 100 %$965 100 %$854 100 %
Operating income:
Electric$146 88 %$148 89 %$147 89 %
Gas19 12 19 11 18 11 
Total operating income$165 100 %$167 100 %$165 100 %
 2017 2016 2015
      
Operating revenue:     
Electric88% 86% 86%
Gas12
 14
 14
 100% 100% 100%
      
Operating income:     
Electric89% 89% 91%
Gas11
 11
 9
 100% 100% 100%


Nevada Power'sPower was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in 1929 and its principal executive offices are located at 6226 West Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146, and its telephone number is (702) 402-5000. Nevada Power402-5000 and its internet address is www.nvenergy.com.

Sierra Pacific was incorporated in 1929 under the laws of the state of Nevada.

Sierra Pacific'sNevada in 1912 and its principal executive offices are located at 6100 Neil Road, Reno, Nevada 89511, and its telephone number is (775) 834-4011. Sierra Pacific was incorporated in 1912 under the laws of the state of Nevada.834-4011 and its internet address is www.nvenergy.com.



20


Regulated Electric Operations


Customers


The Nevada Utilities' sell electricity to retail customers in a single state jurisdiction. Electricity sold to the Nevada Utilities' retail and wholesale customers by class of customer and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Nevada Power:
GWhs sold:
Residential10,299 42 %10,415 44 %10,477 46 %
Commercial4,904 21 4,838 21 4,591 20 
Industrial5,630 23 5,270 22 4,881 21 
Other191 198 195 
Total fully bundled21,024 87 20,721 88 20,144 88 
Distribution only service2,786 11 2,646 11 2,425 11 
Total retail23,810 98 23,367 99 22,569 99 
Wholesale586 356 374 
Total GWhs sold24,396 100 %23,723 100 %22,943 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential886 89 %871 88 %856 88 %
Commercial113 11 112 12 110 12 
Industrial— — — 
Total1,001 100 %985 100 %968 100 %
Sierra Pacific:
GWhs sold:
Residential2,747 22 %2,769 23 %2,672 23 %
Commercial3,124 26 3,056 26 2,977 26 
Industrial2,867 23 3,716 31 3,544 31 
Other13 — 15 — 15 — 
Total fully bundled8,751 71 9,556 80 9,208 80 
Distribution only service2,757 23 1,639 14 1,670 15 
Total retail11,508 94 11,195 94 10,878 95 
Wholesale741 656 548 
Total GWhs sold12,249 100 %11,851 100 %11,426 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential322 87 %316 87 %310 86 %
Commercial49 13 49 13 49 14 
Total371 100 %365 100 %359 100 %
 2017 2016 2015
Nevada Power:           
GWh sold:           
Residential9,501
 42% 9,394
 42% 9,246
 41%
Commercial4,656
 20
 4,663
 21
 4,635
 21
Industrial6,201
 28
 7,313
 32
 7,571
 34
Other212
 1
 212
 1
 214
 1
Total fully bundled20,570
 91
 21,582
 96
 21,666
 97
DOS1,830
 8
 662
 3
 407
 2
Total retail22,400
 99
 22,244
 99
 22,073
 99
Wholesale314
 1
 258
 1
 353
 1
Total GWh sold22,714
 100% 22,502
 100% 22,426
 100%
            
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):           
Residential810
 88% 796
 88% 782
 88%
Commercial106
 12
 105
 12
 104
 12
Industrial2
 
 2
 
 2
 
Total918
 100% 903
 100% 888
 100%
            
Sierra Pacific:           
GWh sold:           
Residential2,492
 24% 2,375
 23% 2,315
 23%
Commercial2,954
 28
 2,933
 28
 2,942
 29
Industrial3,176
 30
 3,014
 30
 2,973
 29
Other16
 
 16
 
 16
 
Total fully bundled8,638
 82
 8,338
 81
 8,246
 81
DOS1,394
 13
 1,360
 13
 1,304
 13
Total retail10,032
 95% 9,698
 94% 9,550
 93%
Wholesale561
 5
 662
 6
 664
 7
Total GWh sold10,593
 100% 10,360
 100% 10,214
 100%
            
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):           
Residential295
 86% 291
 86% 288
 86%
Commercial47
 14
 47
 14
 46
 14
Total342
 100% 338
 100% 334
 100%


Variations in weather, economic conditions, particularly for gaming, mining and wholesale customers and various conservation, energy efficiency and private generation measures and programs can impact customer usage.energy requirements. Wholesale sales are impacted by market prices for energy relative to the incremental cost to generate power.


There are seasonal variations in the Nevada Utilities' electric business that are principally related to weather and the related use of electricity for air conditioning. Typically, 46-50%48-52% of Nevada Power's and 35-38%37-40% of Sierra Pacific's regulated electric revenue is reported in the months of June July, August andthrough September.



21


The annual hourly peak customer demand on the Nevada Utilities' electric systems occurs as a result of air conditioning use during the cooling season. Peak demand represents the highest demand on a given day and at a given hour. On June 20, 2017,July 11, 2022, customer usage of electricity caused an hourly peak demand of 5,929 MW6,033 MWs on Nevada Power's electric system, which is 195 MW267 MWs less than the record hourly peak demand of 6,124 MW6,300 MWs set July 28, 2016.9, 2021. On August 1, 2017,July 27, 2022, customer usage of electricity caused an hourly peak demand of 1,824 MW1,962 MWs on Sierra Pacific's electric system, which is 18 MW144 MWs less than the record hourly peak demand of 1,842 MW2,106 MWs set July 28, 2016.12, 2021.


Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply


The Nevada Utilities have ownership interest in a diverse portfolio of generating facilities. The following table presents certain information regarding the Nevada Utilities' owned generating facilities as of December 31, 2017:2022:
FacilityNet Owned
Net CapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy SourceInstalled
(MWs)(1)
(MWs)(1)
Nevada Power:
NATURAL GAS:
LenzieLas Vegas, NVNatural gas20061,185 1,185 
ClarkLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1973-20081,102 1,102 
Harry AllenLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1995-2011628 628 
HigginsPrimm, NVNatural gas2004589 589 
SilverhawkLas Vegas, NVNatural gas2004590 590 
Las VegasLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1994-2003272 272 
Sun PeakLas Vegas, NVNatural gas/oil1991210 210 
4,576 4,576 
RENEWABLES:
NellisLas Vegas, NVSolar201515 15 
GoodspringsGoodsprings, NVWaste heat2010
20 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity4,596 4,596 
Sierra Pacific:
NATURAL GAS:
TracySparks, NVNatural gas1974-2008773 773 
Ft. ChurchillYerington, NVNatural gas1968-1971196 196 
Clark MountainSparks, NVNatural gas1994132 132 
1,101 1,101 
COAL:
Valmy Unit Nos. 1 and 2Valmy, NVCoal1981-1985522 261 
RENEWABLES:
Ft. ChurchillYerington, NVSolar201520 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity1,643 1,382 
Total NV Energy Available Generating Capacity6,239 5,978 
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
Dry LakeDry Lake, NVSolarEst. 2023150 150 
6,389 6,128 
(1)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates Nevada Power or Sierra Pacific's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.

22

        Facility Net Owned
        Net Capacity Capacity
Generating Facility Location Energy Source Installed 
(MW)(1)
 
(MW)(1)
Nevada Power:          
NATURAL GAS:          
Clark Las Vegas, NV Natural gas 1973-2008 1,102
 1,102
Lenzie Las Vegas, NV Natural gas 2006 1,102
 1,102
Harry Allen Las Vegas, NV Natural gas 1995-2011 628
 628
Higgins Primm, NV Natural gas 2004 530
 530
Silverhawk Las Vegas, NV Natural gas 2004 520
 520
Las Vegas Las Vegas, NV Natural gas 1994-2003 272
 272
Sun Peak Las Vegas, NVNatural gas/oil 1991 210
 210
        4,364
 4,364
COAL:          
Navajo Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3(2)
 Page, AZ Coal 1974-1976 2,250
 255
        

 

RENEWABLES:          
Goodsprings Goodsprings, NV Waste heat 2010 5
 5
Nellis Las Vegas, NV Solar 2015 15
 15
        20
 20
           
Total Nevada Power       6,634
 4,639
           
Sierra Pacific:          
NATURAL GAS:          
Tracy Sparks, NV Natural gas 1974-2008 753
 753
Ft. Churchill Yerington, NVNatural gas 1968-1971 226
 226
Clark Mountain Sparks, NV Natural gas 1994 132
 132
        1,111
 1,111
COAL:          
Valmy Unit Nos. 1 and 2 Valmy, NV Coal 1981-1985 522
 261
           
Total Sierra Pacific       1,633
 1,372
           
Total NV Energy       8,267
 6,011


(1)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MW) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates Nevada Power or Sierra Pacific's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
(2)Nevada Power currently anticipates retiring Navajo Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 on or before December 2019. Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion.


The following table shows the percentages of the Nevada Utilities' total energy supplied by energy source for the years ended December 31:

202220212020
Nevada Power:
Total energy generated - natural gas60 %64 %66 %
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
23 19 15 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)10 13 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other
100 %100 %100 %
Sierra Pacific:
Natural gas41 %43 %48 %
Coal11 11 
Total energy generated52 54 56 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
28 17 15 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)11 14 24 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other15 
100 %100 %100 %
(1)     All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.
 2017 2016 2015
      
Nevada Power:     
Natural gas61% 64% 65%
Coal7
 7
 7
Total energy generated68
 71
 72
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)15
 14
 15
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
15
 14
 12
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other2
 1
 1
 100% 100% 100%
      
Sierra Pacific:     
Natural gas44% 45% 41%
Coal5
 8
 13
Total energy generated49
 53
 54
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)38
 36
 36
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
11
 10
 9
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other2
 1
 1
 100% 100% 100%

(1)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with renewable energy purchased may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements or (b) sold to third parties in the form of renewable energy credits or other environmental commodities.


The Nevada Utilities are required to have resources available to continuously meet their customer needs and reliably operate their electric systems. The percentage of the Nevada Utilities' energy supplied by energy source varies from year-to-year and is subject to numerous operational and economic factors such as planned and unplanned outages; fuel commodity prices; fuel transportation costs; weather; environmental considerations; transmission constraints; and wholesale market prices of electricity. The Nevada Utilities evaluate these factors continuously in order to facilitate economicaleconomic dispatch of their generating facilities. When factors for one energy source are less favorable, the Nevada Utilities place more reliance on other energy sources. As long as the Nevada Utilities' purchases are deemed prudent by the PUCN, through their annual prudency review, the Nevada Utilities are permitted to recover the cost of fuel and purchased power. The Nevada Utilities also have the ability to reset quarterly BTER,the BTERs, with PUCN approval, based on the last twelve12 months fuel costs and purchased power and to reset quarterly DEAA.


In response to these energy supply challenges, theThe Nevada Utilities have adopted an approach to managing the energy supply function that has three primary elements. The first element is a set of management guidelines tofor procuring and optimizing the supply portfolio that is consistent with the requirements of a load serving entity with a full requirements obligation, and with the growth of private generation serving a small but growing group of customers with partial requirements. The second element is an energy risk management and risk control approach that ensures clear separation of roles between the day-to-day management of risks and compliance monitoring and control and ensures clear distinction between policy setting (or planning) and execution. Lastly, the Nevada Utilities pursue a process of ongoing regulatory involvement and acknowledgment of the resource portfolio management plans.


The Nevada Utilities have entered into multiple long-term power purchase contracts (three or more years) with suppliers that generate electricity utilizing renewable resources and natural gas and coal.gas. Nevada Power has entered into contracts with a total capacity of 1,620 MW3,522 MWs with contract termination dates ranging from 20222023 to 2067. Included in these contracts are 1,360 MW3,352 MWs of capacity offrom renewable energy, of which 100 MW1,818 MWs of capacity are under development or construction and not currently available. Sierra Pacific has entered into contracts with a total capacity of 703 MW985 MWs with contract termination dates ranging from 20182023 to 2044.2049. Included in these contracts are 512 MW973 MWs of capacity offrom renewable energy, of which 200 MW25 MWs of capacity are under development or construction and not currently available.



The Nevada Utilities manage certain risks relating to their supply of electricity and fuel requirements by entering into various contracts, which may be accounted for as derivatives, including forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements. Refer to NV Energy's "General Regulation" section in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of energy cost recovery by jurisdiction and Nevada Power's Item 7A and Sierra Pacific's Item 7A in this Form 10-K for a discussion of commodity price risk and derivative contracts.


23


Natural Gas


The Nevada Utilities rely on first-of-the-month indexed physical gas purchases for the majority of natural gas needed to operate their generating facilities. To secure natural gas supplies for the generating facilities, the Nevada Utilities execute purchases pursuant to a PUCN approved four season laddering strategy. In 2017,2022, natural gas supply net purchases averaged 326,215299,831 and 141,188 Dth149,418 Dths per day with the winter period contracts averaging 272,467256,039 and 167,214 Dth120,985 Dths per day and the summer period contracts averaging 364,141330,731 and 122,702 Dth189,714 Dths per day for Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, respectively. The Nevada Utilities believe supplies from these sources are presently adequate and available to meet its needs.


The Nevada Utilities contract for firm natural gas pipeline capacity to transport natural gas from production areas to their service territory through direct interconnects to the pipeline systems of several interstate natural gas pipeline systems, including Nevada Power who contracts with Kern River, an affiliated company. Sierra Pacific utilizes natural gas storage contracted from interstate pipelines to meet retail customer requirements and to manage the daily changes in demand due to changes in weather and other usage factors. The stored natural gas is typically replaced during off-peak months when the demand for natural gas is historically lower than during the heating season.


Coal


Other than the agreement mentioned below for the Navajo Generating Station, the Nevada Utilities have no commitments to purchase coal for 2018 or beyond and will relySierra Pacific relies on spot market solicitations for any coal supplies needed during 2018 and will regularly monitor the western coal market for opportunities to meet these needs. Nevada Power eliminated Reid Gardner Unit No. 4's coal pile in March 2017. The Nevada Utilities haveSierra Pacific has a transportation services contractscontract with Union Pacific Railroad Company to ship coal from various origins in Centralcentral Utah, Westernwestern Colorado and Wyoming that expiredexpires December 31, 2017 for Nevada Power and expire December 31, 2019 for2025. Sierra Pacific. The Navajo Generating Station, jointly owned by Nevada Power along with other entities and operated by Salt River Project,Pacific has a coal purchase agreement that extends through December 2019.

Transmission and Distribution

2023. The Nevada Utilities' transmission system is part of the Western Interconnection, a regional grid in the United States. The Western Interconnection includes the interconnected transmission systems of 14 western states, two Canadian provinces and parts of Mexico. The Nevada Utilities' transmission system, together with contractual rights on other transmission systems, enables the Nevada Utilities to integrate and access generation resources to meet their customer load requirements. Nevada Power's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 2,000 miles of transmission lines, 25,000 miles of distribution lines and 210 substations asValmy generating facility, Sierra Pacific's remaining facility requiring coal, has an approved retirement date of December 31, 2017. Sierra Pacific's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 2,300 miles of transmission lines, 17,700 miles of distribution lines and 200 substations as of December 31, 2017.

ON Line is a 231 mile, 500-kV transmission line connecting Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's service territories. ON Line provides the ability to jointly dispatch energy throughout Nevada and provide access to renewable energy resources in parts of northern and eastern Nevada, which enhances the Nevada Utilities' ability to manage and optimize their generating facilities. ON Line provides between 600 and 800 MW of transfer capability with interconnection between the Robinson Summit substation on the Sierra Pacific system and the Harry Allen substation on the2025. Nevada Power system. ON Line was a joint project between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC. The Nevada Utilities own a 25% interest in ON Line and have entered into a long-term transmission use agreement with Great Basin Transmission, LLC for its 75% interest in ON Line until 2054. The Nevada Utilities share of its 25% interest in ON Line and the long-term transmission use agreement is split 95% for Nevada Power and 5% for Sierra Pacific.has no coal requirements.



Energy Imbalance Market

The Nevada Utilities participate in the EIM operated by the California ISO, which reduces costs to serve customers through more efficient dispatch of a larger and more diverse pool of resources, more effectively integrates renewables and enhances reliability through improved situational awareness and responsiveness. The EIM expands the real-time component of the California ISOISO's market technology to optimize and balance electricity supply and demand every five minutes across the EIM footprint. The EIM is voluntary and available to all balancing authorities in the Western United States.western U.S. EIM market participants submit bids to the California ISO market operator before each hour for each generating resource they choose to be dispatched by the market. Each bid is comprised of a dispatchable operating range, ramp rate and prices across the operating range. The California ISO market operator uses sophisticated technology to select the least-cost resources to meet demand and send simultaneous dispatch signals to every participating generator across the EIM footprint every five minutes. In addition to generation resource bids, the California ISO market operator also receives continuous real-time updates of the transmission grid network, meteorological and load forecast information that it uses to optimize dispatch instructions. Outside the EIM footprint, utilities in the Western United Stateswestern U.S. do not utilize comparable technology and are largely limited to transactions within the borders of their balancing authority area to balance supply and demand intra-hour using a combination of manual and automated dispatch. The EIM delivers customer benefits by leveraging automation geographic and resource diversity to result in more efficient dispatch, more effective integration of renewables and improved situational awareness. Benefits are expected to increase further with renewable resource expansion and as more entities join the EIM bringing incremental diversity.


Future GenerationTransmission and Distribution


The Nevada Utilities' transmission system is part of the Western Interconnection, a regional grid in the U.S. The Western Interconnection includes the interconnected transmission systems of 14 western states, two Canadian provinces and parts of Mexico. The Nevada Utilities' transmission system, together with contractual rights on other transmission systems, enables the Nevada Utilities file to integrate and access generation resources to meet their customer load requirements. Nevada Power's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 1,900 miles of transmission lines, 14,000 miles of distribution lines and 220 substations as of December 31, 2022. Sierra Pacific's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 4,200 miles of transmission lines, 9,600 miles of distribution lines and 210 substations as of December 31, 2022.

24


ON Line is a 231-mile, 500-kV transmission line connecting Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's service territories. ON Line provides the ability to jointly dispatch energy throughout Nevada and provide access to renewable energy resources in parts of northern and eastern Nevada, which enhances the Nevada Utilities' ability to manage and optimize their generating facilities. ON Line provides between 600 MWs northbound and 900 MWs southbound of transfer capability with interconnection between the Robinson Summit substation on the Sierra Pacific system and the Harry Allen substation on the Nevada Power system. ON Line was a joint project between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC. The Nevada Utilities own a 25% interest in ON Line and have entered into a long-term transmission use agreement with Great Basin Transmission, LLC for its 75% interest in ON Line until 2054. The Nevada Utilities share of its 25% interest in ON Line and the long-term transmission use agreement is split 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific.

The PUCN has approved the Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program, with an estimated cost of approximately $2.6 billion, which builds a foundation for the Nevada Utilities to accommodate existing and future transmission network customers, increase transmission system reliability, create access to diversified renewable resources, facilitate development of existing designated solar energy zones, facilitate conventional generation retirement and achieve Nevada's carbon reduction and eventual net-zero objectives. The Greenlink program consists of a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. The Greenlink program will be constructed in stages that are estimated to be placed in-service between December 2026 and December 2028. The Nevada Utilities will jointly own and operate the Greenlink transmission lines. Through December 31, 2022, $51 million had been spent.

Future Generation, Conservation and Energy Efficiency

Energy Supply Planning

Within the energy supply planning process, there are four key components covering different time frames:

IRPs are filed by the Nevada Utilities for approval by the PUCN every three years and the Nevada Utilities may, as necessary, may file amendments to their IRPs. IRPs are prepared in compliance with Nevada laws and regulations and cover a 20-year period. Nevada law governing the IRP process was modified in 2017 and now requires joint filings by Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. IRPs develop a comprehensive, integrated plan that considers customer energy requirements and propose the resources to meet those requirements in a manner that is consistent with prevailing market fundamentals. The ultimate goal of the IRPs is to balance the objectives of minimizing costs and reducing volatility while reliably meeting the electric needs of the Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific'sUtilities' customers. Costs incurred to complete projects approved through the IRP process still remain subject to review for reasonableness by the PUCN.

Nevada PowerEnergy Supply Plans ("ESP") are filed its triennial IRP in July 2015 and received PUCN approval in December 2015. Nevada Power filed an amended IRP in August 2016 and received PUCN approval in December 2016. Sierra Pacific filed its triennial IRP in July 2016 and received PUCN approval in December 2016. As a part of the filings, the Nevada Utilities sought PUCN authorization to acquire the South Point Energy Center, a 504-MW combined-cycle generating facility located in Arizona. In December 2016,with the PUCN deniedfor approval and operate in conjunction with the acquisition of this facility. In January 2017, Nevada Power filed a petition for reconsideration relating to the acquisition of South Point Energy Center. In February 2017, the PUCN affirmed the denial of the acquisition of South Point Energy Center.PUCN-approved 20-year IRP. The Nevada Utilities amended their respective IRPs in November 2017, requesting approval of three long-term renewable purchase power contracts. Nevada law was modified in 2017 under Senate Bill 146 and for future filings requires Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific to file jointly.

There is the potential for continued price volatility in the Nevada Utilities' service territories, particularly during peak periods. Too great of a dependence on generation from the wholesale market can lead to power price volatilities depending on available power supply and prevailing natural gas prices. The Nevada Utilities face load obligation uncertainty due to the potential for customer switching. Some counterparties in these areas have significant credit difficulties, representing credit risk to the Nevada Utilities. Finally, the Nevada Utilities' own credit situation can have an impact on its ability to enter into transactions.

Within the energy supply planning process, there are three key components covering different time frames:

The PUCN-approved long-term IRP which is filed every three years andESP has a 20-yearone- to three-year planning horizon;
The PUCN-approved energy supply plan whichhorizon and is an intermediate termintermediate-term resource procurement and risk management plan that establishes the supply portfolio strategies within which intermediate termintermediate-term resource requirements will be met with PUCN approval required for executing contracts of longer than three years.
Distributed Resource Plans ("DRP") are filed with the PUCN for approval and has a one to three year planning horizon; and
Tactical execution activities with a one-month to twelve-month focus.

The energy supply plan operatesoperate in conjunction with the PUCN-approved 20-year IRP. It serves asThe DRP establishes a guideformal process to aid in the cost-effective integration of distributed resources into the Nevada Utilities' distribution and transmission process and ultimately the NV Energy utilities' electricity grid.
Action plans are filed with the PUCN for near-termapproval and operate in conjunction with the PUCN-approved 20-year IRP and PUCN-approved ESP. The action plan establishes tactical execution and fulfillment of energy needs. activities with a three-year focus.

25


In September 2017,June 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed updatesa joint application for approval of their 2022-2041 Triennial IRP, 2022-2024 ESP and 2022-2024 Action Plan. As part of the filing, the Nevada Utilities requested approval of 600 MWs of solar photovoltaic generating resources with 480 MWs of battery energy storage capacity, three battery energy storage projects with 66 MWs of capacity, the acquisition of one existing solar photovoltaic generating facility with 19.5 MWs of capacity that is currently leased to their respectiveSierra Pacific, and network upgrades associated with the new renewable energy supply plans seeking PUCN authorization to implementprojects. In September 2021, a laddering strategyhearing was held for the procurementgeneration upgrades portion of short-term energythe application, which resulted in an order approving that portion of the joint IRP. The Nevada Utilities filed a partial party stipulation resolving all issues related to the ESP, load forecast and capacity to serve peak customer demand.fuel and purchased power price portions of the joint IRP. In October 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed a corrected stipulation, which was approved by the PUCN. In November 2021, a hearing was conducted for the remaining portions of the joint IRP and in December 2021, the PUCN issued an order granting in part and denying in part. The PUCN approved Sierra Pacific's laddering strategythe construction of the 600 MWs of solar photovoltaic generating resources with 480 MWs of battery energy storage capacity, the acquisition of the existing solar photovoltaic generating facility and the network upgrade, among other items. However, the three additional battery energy storage projects were deferred for approval in October 2017,future plans and the PUCN declined to retire Valmy 1 early and made adjustments to the approved budget for developing and conducting the distributed resource energy trial.

In September 2021, in compliance with Senate Bill ("SB") 448, the Nevada Power's laddering strategyUtilities filed an amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for approval of their Transmission Infrastructure for a Clean Energy Economy Plan that sets forth a plan for the construction of certain high-voltage transmission infrastructure which includes a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line known as Greenlink North and a 32-mile, 525-kV transmission segment of Greenlink West. In January 2022, the Nevada Utilities reached a settlement with all the intervening parties and presented a stipulation before the PUCN related to the Greenlink transmission project. The settlement allows for the Nevada Utilities to receive approval to construct the Greenlink North project and the remaining segment of the Greenlink West project. The settlement allows the Nevada Utilities to designate these projects as critical facilities that will allow the Nevada Utilities to propose financial incentives in future proceedings. Potential financial incentives include construction work in process included in rate base and the ability to use regulatory asset accounting treatment. The Nevada Utilities agreed not to seek an enhanced return on investment at the state level as part of the settlement. The stipulation was approved by the PUCN in January 2022.

In March 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed the first amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for approval of the battery energy storage system with 220 MWs of capacity; a $3.5 million funding request to further study and perform due diligence on the pumped storage hydro project with a capacity of 1,000 MW, an addition of the geothermal facility purchase power agreement for 25 MW of renewable energy, peak firing project upgrades at the existing generating units to yield 48 MW of additional on-peak generation thermal energy storage project to increase the generating station's peak capacity by 18 MW, and network upgrades associated with the battery energy storage system. In April 2022, a partial stipulation was filed to remedy the redaction of the purchase power agreement pricing and in June 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed a settlement stipulation resolving all remaining issues. The PUCN approved the stipulation in July 2022.

In compliance with SB 448, the Nevada Utilities filed their second and third amendments to the 2021 joint IRP in July and September 2022, respectively. The Nevada Utilities requested an approval to amend the Demand Side Plan for the action period for 2022-2024 in July's filing and requested in September an approval of a DRP amendment to implement the state's first Transportation Electrification Plan ("TEP") and approve proposed tariffs and schedules to implement the TEP. In November 2017. When2022, the Nevada Utilities filed an all-party settlement stipulation of the second amendment to the IRP, resolving all issues. A hearing related to the application for approval of the third amendment was held in February 2023.

In November 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed their fourth amendment to the 2021 joint IRP requesting an approval of a generation update to the Supply Plan, an addition of 400 MW of peaking combustion turbines, a 120 MW geothermal portfolio long-term power purchase agreement, a 20 MW new geothermal technology long-term purchase power agreement, and a 200 MW grid-tied battery energy supply plan calls for executing contractsstorage system at the Valmy generating facility as well as necessary transmission upgrades. An order is expected in the first half of longer than three years, PUCN approval is required.2023.



26


Energy-EfficiencyEnergy Efficiency Programs


The Nevada Utilities have provided a comprehensive set of energy efficiency, demand response and conservation programs to their Nevada electric customers. The programs are designed to reduce energy consumption and more effectively manage when energy is used, including management of seasonal peak loads. Current programs offer services to customers such as energy audits and customer education and awareness efforts that provide information on how to improve the efficiency of their homes and businesses. To assist customers in investing in energy efficiency, the Nevada Utilities have offered rebates or incentives encouraging the purchase and installation of high-efficiency equipment such as lighting, heating and cooling equipment, weatherization, motors, process equipment and systems, as well as incentives for efficient construction. Incentives are also paid to residential customers who participate in the air conditioner load control program and nonresidential customers who participate in the nonresidential load management program. Energy efficiency program costs are recovered through annual rates set by the PUCN and adjusted based on the Nevada Utilities' annual filing to recover current program costs and any over or under collections from the prior filing, subject to prudence review. During 2017,2022, Nevada Power spent $39$34 million on energy efficiency programs, resulting in an estimated 191,836 MWh205,974 MWhs of electric energy savings and an estimated 224 MW179 MWs of electric peak load management. During 2017,2022, Sierra Pacific spent $11$8 million on energy efficiency programs, resulting in an estimated 57,502 MWh40,539 MWhs of electric energy savings and an estimated 18 MW23 MWs of electric peak load management.


Regulated Natural Gas Operations


Sierra Pacific is engaged in the procurement, transportation and distribution of natural gas forto customers in its service territory.territory and the related procurement, transportation and storage of natural gas for the benefit of those customers. Sierra Pacific purchases natural gas from various suppliers and contracts with interstate natural gas pipelines for transportation of the natural gas from the production areas to Sierra Pacific's service territory and for storage services to manage fluctuations in system demand and seasonal pricing. Sierra Pacific sells natural gas and delivery services to end-use customers on its distribution system; sells natural gas to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies; and transports natural gas through its distribution system for a number of end-use customers who have independently secured their supply of natural gas. During 2017, 11%2022, 7% of the total natural gas delivered through Sierra Pacific's distribution system was for transportation service.


Natural gas property consists primarily of natural gas mains and service lines, meters, and related distribution equipment, including feeder lines to communities served from natural gas pipelines owned by others. The natural gas distribution facilities of Sierra Pacific included 3,3003,600 miles of natural gas mains and service lines as of December 31, 2017.2022.


Customer Usage and Seasonality


The percentages of natural gas sold to Sierra Pacific's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer, total DthDths of natural gas sold, total DthDths of transportation service and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Residential55 %53 %56 %
Commercial(1)
28 28 28 
Industrial(1)
11 10 10 
Total retail94 91 94 
Wholesale(2)
100 %100 %100 %
Total Dths of natural gas sold (in thousands)20,62220,05018,622
Total Dths of transportation service (in thousands)1,5761,8502,217
Total average number of retail customers (in thousands)180177174

(1)Commercial and industrial customers are classified primarily based on the nature of their business and natural gas usage. Commercial customers are non-residential customers with monthly gas usage less than 12,000 therms during five consecutive winter months. Industrial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas in excess of 12,000 therms during one or more winter months.

(2)Wholesale sales are generally made to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies for eventual resale to end-use customers.

27

 2017 2016 2015
      
Residential53% 52% 49%
Commercial(1)
27
 26
 24
Industrial(1)
9
 9
 8
Total retail89
 87
 81
Wholesale11
 13
 19
 100% 100% 100%
      
Total Dth of natural gas sold (in thousands)19,313
 17,677
 17,600
Total Dth of transportation service (in thousands)1,977
 2,256
 2,288
Total average number of retail customers (in thousands)165
 163
 159


(1)Commercial and industrial customers are classified primarily based on their natural gas usage. Commercial customers are non-residential customers with monthly gas usage less than 12,000 therms during five consecutive winter months. Industrial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas in excess of 12,000 therms during one or more winter months.

There are seasonal variations in Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas business that are principally due to the use of natural gas for heating. Typically, 50-60%47-56% of Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas revenue is reported in the months of January, February, March and December.December through March.


On January 6, 2017,December 18, 2022, Sierra Pacific recorded its highest peak-day natural gas delivery of 148,077 Dth,152,157 Dths, which is 15,497 Dth11,417 Dths less than the record peak-day delivery of 163,574 DthDths set on December 9, 2013. This peak-day delivery consisted of 94%96% traditional retail sales service and 6%4% transportation service.


Fuel Supply and Capacity


The purchase of natural gas for Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas operations is done in combination with the purchase of natural gas for Sierra Pacific's regulated electric operations. In response to energy supply challenges, Sierra Pacific has adopted an approach to managing the energy supply function that has three primary elements, as discussed earlier under Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply. Similar to Sierra Pacific's regulated electric operations, as long as Sierra Pacific's purchases of natural gas are deemed prudent by the PUCN, through its annual prudency review, Sierra Pacific is permitted to recover the cost of natural gas. Sierra Pacific also has the ability, with PUCN approval, to reset quarterly BTER, with PUCN approval,the BTERs, based on the last twelve12 months fuel costs, and to reset quarterly DEAA.


Human Capital

Employees


As of December 31, 2017,2022, Nevada Power had approximately 1,400 employees, of which approximately 700 were covered by a collective bargaining agreementunion contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, Sierra Pacific had approximately 1,000 employees, of which approximately 500 were covered by a collective bargaining agreementunion contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.


For more information regarding Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.

NORTHERN POWERGRID


Northern Powergrid, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is a holding company which owns two companies that distribute electricity in Great Britain, Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limitedplc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc. In addition to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, Northern Powergrid also owns a meter asset rental business that leases smart meters to energy suppliers in the United Kingdom, and Ireland, an engineering contracting business that provides electrical infrastructure contracting services primarily to third parties, and a hydrocarbon exploration and development business that is focused on developing integrated upstream gas projects in Europe and Australia.Australia and ownership interests in two solar generation facilities in Australia having a total net owned capacity of 260 MWs.


The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies serve 3.94.0 million end-users and operate in the north-east of England from North Northumberland through Tyne and Wear, County Durham and Yorkshire to North Lincolnshire, an area covering 10,000 square miles. The principal function of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies is to build, maintain and operate the electricity distribution network through which the end-user receives a supply of electricity.


The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies receive electricity from the national grid transmission system and from generators that are directly connected to the distribution network and distribute it to end-users' premises using their networks of transformers, switchgear and distribution lines and cables. Substantially all of the end-users in the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution service areas are directly or indirectly connected to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' networks and electricity can only be delivered to these end-users through their distribution systems, thus providing the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies with distribution volumes that are relatively stable from year to year. The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies charge fees for the use of their distribution systems to the suppliers of electricity.


28


The suppliers purchase electricity from generators, sell the electricity to end-user customers and use the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution networks pursuant to an industry standard "Distribution Connection and Use of System Agreement." During 2017, RWE Npower PLC2022, E.ON and certain of its affiliates and British Gas Trading Limited represented 21%22% and 15%14%, respectively, of the total combined distribution revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies. Variations in demand from end-users can affect the revenues that are received by the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies in any year, but such variations have no effect on the total revenue that the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies are allowed to recover in a price control period. Under- or over-recoveries against price-controlled revenues are carried forward into prices for future years.


During 2021, 28 suppliers went bankrupt due to rising wholesale prices, particularly for natural gas. This resulted in energy supply costs being higher than the Ofgem set variable tariff price cap that can be charged to customers. Any distribution use of system bad debts suffered by Northern Powergrid is recoverable in future distribution use of systems revenue.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' combined service territory features a diverse economy with no dominant sector. The mix of rural, agricultural, urban and industrial areas covers a broad customer base ranging from domestic usage through farming and retail to major industry including automotives, chemicals, mining, steelmaking and offshore marine construction. The industry within the area is concentrated around the principal centers of Newcastle, Middlesbrough, Sheffield and Leeds.



The price controlledprice-controlled revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies is set out in the special conditions of the licenses of those companies. The licenses are enforced by the regulator, the Gas and Electricity Markets AuthorityGEMA, through its office of gas and electric markets (known as "Ofgem")Ofgem, and limit increases to allowed revenues (or may require decreases) based upon the rate of inflation, other specified factors and other regulatory action. Changes to the price controls can be made by the regulator, but if a licensee disagrees with a change to its license it can appeal the matter to the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority ("CMA"). It has been the convention in Great Britain for regulators to conduct periodic regulatory reviews before making proposals for any changes to the price controls. The current electricity distribution price control became effective April 1, 2015 and is expected towill continue through March 31, 2023. Following initial submission ofOfgem has set the next price control for the five-year period from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2028. The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies'Companies published and filed their business plans for the currentnext price control period towith Ofgem in July 2013 and resubmission, following feedback from Ofgem in March 2014, theDecember 2021 with final determinations for the current price control were published in November 2014. In March 2015 Northern Powergrid was the only electricity distributor to appeal Ofgem's2022. The remaining necessary step for this price control decision and in September 2015to be effective is the appeal authority allowed partstatutory modification of the appeal, awarding an additional £30 million (in 2012/13 prices) in expenditure allowances.license, which was published by Ofgem on February 3, 2023 and will become effective on April 1, 2023.


GWhGWhs and percentages of electricity distributed to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' end-users and the total number of end-users as of and for the years ended December 31 were as follows:

202220212020
GWhs distributed:
Residential11,880 37 %13,334 39 %12,946 40 %
Commercial3,737 12 3,643 11 3,459 10 
Industrial16,239 50 16,424 49 15,917 49 
Other301 318 359 
32,157 100 %33,719 100 %32,681 100 %
Number of end-users (in thousands):3,953 3,941 3,934 

 2017 2016 2015
Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limited:           
Residential5,125
 36% 5,227
 36% 5,144
 34%
Commercial(1)
1,782
 13
 2,222
 15
 2,417
 16
Industrial(1)
7,134
 50
 6,963
 48
 7,160
 48
Other198
 1
 214
 1
 231
 2
 14,239
 100% 14,626
 100% 14,952
 100%
            
Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc:           
Residential7,509
 36% 7,612
 36% 7,574
 35%
Commercial(1)
2,558
 12
 3,116
 15
 3,352
 16
Industrial(1)
10,716
 51
 10,275
 48
 10,403
 48
Other268
 1
 290
 1
 299
 1
 21,051
 100% 21,293
 100% 21,628
 100%
            
Total electricity distributed35,290
   35,919
   36,580
  
            
Number of end-users (in thousands):           
Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limited1,603
   1,602
   1,597
  
Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc2,301
   2,301
   2,294
  
 3,904
   3,903
   3,891
  

(1)The increase in industrial and decrease in commercial is largely due to an acceleration in the Great Britain-wide customer reclassifications which are in progress (as a result of Ofgem approved industry changes), negatively impacting commercial volumes by 700 GWhs in 2017 compared to 2016.

As of December 31, 2017,2022, the combined electricity distribution network of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' combined electricity distribution networkCompanies included 17,400approximately 17,000 miles of overhead lines, 42,00043,400 miles of underground cables and 750810 major substations.



29


BHE PIPELINE GROUP (EASTERN ENERGY GAS AND EGTS)


The BHE Pipeline Group consists of BHE's interstate natural gas pipeline companies,BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas and Kern River.River, each an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. The BHE Pipeline Group operates approximately 21,200 miles of pipeline with a design capacity of approximately 21.1 Bcf of natural gas per day, transported approximately 15% of the total natural gas consumed in the U.S. during 2022 and owns assets in 27 states. The BHE Pipeline Group also operates 22 natural gas storage facilities with a total working gas capacity of 515.6 Bcf and an LNG export, import and storage facility.


The Pipeline Companies compete with other pipelines on the basis of cost, flexibility, reliability of service and overall customer service, with the customer's decision being made primarily on the basis of delivered price, which includes both the natural gas commodity cost and transportation costs. The Pipeline Companies also compete with midstream operators and gas marketers seeking to provide or arrange transportation, storage and other services to meet customer needs. Natural gas competes with alternative energy sources, including coal, nuclear energy, wind, geothermal, solar and fuel oil and the electricity generated from these alternative energy sources. The Pipeline Companies generate a substantial portion of their revenue from long-term firm contracts for transportation and storage services and are therefore insulated from competitive factors during the terms of the contracts. When these long-term contracts expire, the Pipeline Companies face competitive pressures from other natural gas pipeline facilities.

Subject to regulatory requirements, the Pipeline Companies attempt to recontract or remarket capacity at the maximum rates allowed under their tariffs, although at times the Pipeline Companies discount these rates to remain competitive. Historically, the Pipeline Companies have been able to provide competitively priced services because of access to a variety of relatively low cost supply basins, cost control measures and the relatively high level of firm entitlement that is sold on a seasonal and annual basis, which lowers the per unit cost of transportation. To date, the Pipeline Companies have avoided significant pipeline system bypasses.

BHE GT&S

BHE GT&S' operations, through its ownership of Eastern Energy Gas, includes three interstate natural gas pipeline systems, one of the nation's largest underground natural gas storage systems and one LNG export, import and storage facility. BHE GT&S' operations also include smaller LNG facilities, a field service company, and a gathering and processing company.

Eastern Energy Gas' principal subsidiaries are EGTS and Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC ("CGT"). EGTS' operations include natural gas transmission and storage pipelines located in Maryland, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. EGTS also operates one of the nation's largest underground natural gas storage systems located in New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. CGT's operations include an interstate natural gas pipeline system located in South Carolina and southeastern Georgia. Eastern Energy Gas also owns a 50% equity interest in Iroquois Gas Transmission System L.P. ("Iroquois"). Iroquois owns and operates an interstate natural gas pipeline located in the states of New York and Connecticut.

Eastern Energy Gas' LNG operations involve the export, import and storage of LNG at the Cove Point LNG Facility that is owned by Cove Point, located in Maryland, as well as the transmission of regasified LNG to the interstate pipeline grid and mid-Atlantic markets and the liquefaction of natural gas for export as LNG. Cove Point's LNG Facility has an operational peak regasification daily send-out capacity of approximately 1.8 million Dth and an aggregate LNG storage capacity of approximately 14.6 billions of cubic feet equivalent ("Bcfe"). In addition, Cove Point has a small liquefier that has the potential to produce approximately 15,000 Dth/day. The Liquefaction Facility consists of one LNG train with a nameplate outlet capacity of 5.25 million tonnes per annum ("Mtpa"). Cove Point has authorization from the DOE to export up to 0.77 Bcfe/day (approximately 5.75 Mtpa) should the Liquefaction Facility perform better than expected. Cove Point's 36-inch diameter underground interstate natural gas pipelines are approximately 139 miles, with interconnections to Transcontinental Gas Pipeline, LLC in Fairfax County, Virginia, and with Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and EGTS in Loudoun County, Virginia. Eastern Energy Gas operates, as the general partner, and owns a 25% limited partnership interest in the Cove Point LNG export, import and storage facility. BHE GT&S also operates and has ownership interests in three smaller LNG facilities in Alabama, Florida and Pennsylvania.

In total, Eastern Energy Gas operates approximately 5,400 miles of natural gas transmission, gathering and storage pipelines, of which approximately 5,200 miles are owned by Eastern Energy Gas, with a design capacity of 12.6 Bcf per day as well as approximately 100 miles of natural gas liquids pipelines operated by BHE GT&S. EGTS operates approximately 3,900 miles of natural gas transmission and storage pipelines with a design capacity of 9.9 Bcf per day. EGTS also operates 17 underground storage fields with a total working gas capacity of approximately 420 Bcf, of which approximately 307 Bcf relates to natural gas storage field capacity that EGTS owns. BHE GT&S' pipeline system is configured with approximately 365 active receipt and delivery points. In 2022, BHE GT&S delivered over 2.0 trillion cubic feet ("Tcf") of natural gas to its customers.
30



BHE GT&S' natural gas transmission and storage earnings primarily result from rates established by FERC. Revenues derived from BHE GT&S' pipeline operations are primarily from reservation charges for firm transmission and storage services as provided for in their FERC-approved tariffs. Reservation charges are required to be paid regardless of volumes transported or stored. The profitability of these businesses is dependent on their ability, through the rates they are permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on their capital investments. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 86% of BHE GT&S' transmission capacity is subscribed, including 81% under long-term contracts and 5% on a year-to-year basis, and approximately 97% of EGTS' storage capacity is subscribed with long-term contracts. As of December 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining contract term for Eastern Energy Gas' and EGTS' firm transmission contracts is seven years and six years, respectively, and EGTS' storage contracts is four years. Additionally, BHE GT&S receives revenue from firm fee-based contractual arrangements, including negotiated rates, for certain pipeline transmission and LNG storage and terminal services. Variability in BHE GT&S' earnings results from changes in operating and maintenance expenditures, as well as changes in rates and the demand for services, which are dependent on weather, changes in commodity prices and the economy.

BHE GT&S' operating revenue for the year ended December 31 was as follows (in millions):
20222021
Transmission$849 35 %$772 36 %
LNG790 33 704 32 
Storage316 13 251 12 
Gas, liquids and other sales447 19 433 20 
Total operating revenue$2,402 100 %$2,160 100 %

Except for quantities of natural gas owned and managed for operational and system balancing purposes, BHE GT&S does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system.

During 2022, BHE GT&S had two customers that each accounted for greater than 10% of its operating revenue and its 10 largest customers accounted for 45% of its total operating revenue. BHE GT&S has agreements with terms through 2038 to retain the majority of its two largest customers' volumes. The loss of any of these significant customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on BHE GT&S.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas had approximately 1,500 employees, consisting of approximately 1,200 natural gas operations employees and 300 corporate services employees. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 600 employees were covered by a union contract with the Utility Workers Union of America.

As of December 31, 2022, EGTS had approximately 1,300 employees, consisting of approximately 1,000 natural gas operations employees and 300 corporate services employees. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 600 employees were covered by a union contract with the Utility Workers Union of America.

For more information regarding Eastern Energy Gas' and EGTS' human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.

31


Northern Natural Gas


Northern Natural Gas an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, owns the largest interstate natural gas pipeline system in the United States,U.S., as measured by pipeline miles, which reaches from west Texas to Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Northern Natural Gas primarily transports and stores natural gas for utilities, municipalities, gas marketing companies and industrial and commercial users. Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system consists of two commercial segments. Its traditional end-use and distribution market area in the northern part of its system, referred to as the Market Area, includes points in Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Dakota, Michigan and Illinois. Its natural gas supply and delivery service area in the southern part of its system, referred to as the Field Area, includes points in Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. The Market Area and Field Area are separated at a Demarcation Point ("Demarc"). Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system consists of 14,70014,400 miles of natural gas pipelines, including 6,3005,900 miles of mainline transmission pipelines and 8,4008,500 miles of branch and lateral pipelines, with a Market Area design capacity of 5.96.3 Bcf per day, a Field Area delivery capacity of 1.7 Bcf per day to the Market Area and 1.31.4 Bcf per day to the West Texas area and over 7995.6 Bcf of firm service and operational storage cycleworking gas capacity in five storage facilities. Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system is configured with approximately 2,3002,215 active receipt and delivery points which are integrated with the facilities of LDCs. Many of Northern Natural Gas' LDC customers are part of combined utilities that also use natural gas as a fuel source for electric generation. Northern Natural Gas deliversdelivered over 1.0 Trillion Cubic Feet ("Tcf")1.4 Tcf of natural gas to its customers annually.in 2022.


Northern Natural Gas' transportation rates and most of its storage rates are cost-based. These rates are designed to provide Northern Natural Gas with an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and earn a reasonable return on its investments. In addition, Northern Natural Gas has fixed rates that are market-based for certain of its firm storage contracts with contract terms that expire in 2028.

Northern Natural Gas' operating revenue for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
Transportation:        
Market Area$504
73% $492
77% $474
72%
Field Area - deliveries to Demarc36
5
 23
4
 49
7
Field Area - other deliveries50
8
 41
6
 35
6
Total transportation590
86
 556
87
 558
85
Storage71
10
 69
11
 62
10
Total transportation and storage revenue661
96
 625
98
 620
95
Gas, liquids and other sales28
4
 11
2
 36
5
Total operating revenue$689
100% $636
100% $656
100%


Substantially all of Northern Natural Gas' Market Area transportation revenue is generated from reservation charges, with the balance from usage charges. Northern Natural Gas transports natural gas primarily to local distribution markets and end-users in the Market Area. Northern Natural Gas provides service to 81 utilities, including MidAmerican Energy, an affiliate company, which serve numerous residential, commercial and industrial customers. Most of Northern Natural Gas' transportation capacity in the Market Area is committed to customers under firm transportation contracts, where customers pay Northern Natural Gas a monthly reservation charge for the right to transport natural gas through Northern Natural Gas' system. Reservation charges are required to be paid regardless of volumes transported or stored. As of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately 85%74% of Northern Natural Gas' customers' entitlement in the Market Area have terms beyond 20192024 and over 78%approximately 61% beyond 2020.2026. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the weighted average remaining contract term for Northern Natural Gas' Market Area firm transportation contracts is over eightsix years.


Northern Natural Gas' Field Area customers consist primarily of energy marketing companies, and midstream companies which take advantage of the price spread opportunities created between Field Area supply points and Demarc. In addition, there are a growing number of midstream customerspower generators that are delivering gas south in the Field Area to the Waha Hub market. The remaining Field Area transportation service is sold to power generators connected to Northern Natural Gas' system in Texas and New Mexico that are contracted on a long-term basis with terms that extend to at least 2020, and various LDCs, energy marketing companies and midstream companies for both connected and off-system markets.

a weighted average remaining contract term of five years. Northern Natural Gas' storage services are provided through the operation of one underground natural gas storage field in Iowa and two underground natural gas storage facilities in Kansas andKansas. Additionally, Northern Natural Gas has two LNG storage peaking units, one in Iowa and one in Minnesota.Minnesota, that support its transportation service. The three underground natural gas storage facilities and two LNG storage peaking units have a total firm service and operational storage cycleworking gas capacity of over 7995.6 Bcf and over 2.2 Bcf per day of peak delivery capability. These storage facilities provide operational flexibility for the daily balancing of Northern Natural Gas' system and provide services to customers for their winter peaking and year-round load swing requirements.

Northern Natural Gas has 65.1 Bcf of firm storage contracts with its cost-based and market-based services. Firm storage contracts with cost-based rates, representing 57.1 Bcf, have anThe average remaining contract term of seven years and are contracted at maximum tariff rates. The remainingfor firm storage contracts with market-based rates, representing 8.0 Bcf, have an average remaining contract term of tenis five years.


Northern Natural Gas' operating revenue for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Transportation:
Market Area$688 66 %$658 61 %$633 65 %
Field Area210 22 177 17 226 24 
Total transportation898 88 835 78 859 89 
Storage97 94 91 
Total transportation and storage revenue995 97 929 87 950 98 
Gas, liquids and other sales28 143 13 18 
Total operating revenue$1,023 100 %$1,072 100 %$968 100 %

Except for quantities of natural gas owned and managed for operational and system balancing purposes, Northern Natural Gas does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system. The sale of natural gas for operational and system balancing purposes accounts for the majority of the remaining operating revenue.


During 2017,2022, Northern Natural Gas had threetwo customers including MidAmerican Energy, that each accounted for greater than 10% of its transportation and storage revenue and its ten10 largest customers accounted for 65%63% of its system-wide transportation and storage revenue. Northern Natural Gas has agreements with terms from 2022 tothrough 2027 and 2034 to retain the majority of its threetwo largest customers' volumes. The loss of anyeither of these significant customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on Northern Natural Gas.


Northern Natural Gas' extensive pipeline system, which is interconnected with many interstate and intrastate pipelines in the national grid system, has access to multiple major supply basins. Direct access is available from producers in the Anadarko, Permian and Hugoton basins, some of which have recently experienced increased production from shale and tight sands formations adjacent to Northern Natural Gas' pipeline. Since 2011, the pipeline has connected 1,985,000 Dth per day of supply access from the Wolfberry shale formation in west Texas and from the Granite Wash tight sands formations in the Texas panhandle and in Oklahoma. Additionally, Northern Natural Gas has interconnections with several interstate pipelines and several intrastate pipelines with receipt, delivery, or bi-directional capabilities. Because of Northern Natural Gas' location and multiple interconnections it is able to access natural gas from other key production areas, such as the Rocky Mountain and western Canadian basins. The Rocky Mountain basins are accessed through interconnects with Trailblazer Pipeline Company, Tallgrass Interstate Gas Transmission, LLC, Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline Company, LLC, Colorado Interstate Gas Company and Rockies Express Pipeline, LLC ("REX"). The western Canadian basins are accessed through interconnects with Northern Border Pipeline Company ("Northern Border"), Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership ("Great Lakes") and Viking Gas Transmission Company ("Viking"). This supply diversity and access to both stable and growing production areas provides significant flexibility to Northern Natural Gas' system and customers.
32



Northern Natural Gas' system experiences significant seasonal swings in demand and revenue, with the highest demand and revenues typically occurring during the months of November through March. This seasonality provides Northern Natural Gas with opportunities to deliver additional value-added services, such as firm and interruptible storage services. As a result of Northern Natural Gas' geographic location in the middle of the United States and its many interconnections with other pipelines, Northern Natural Gas has the opportunity to augment its steady end user and LDC revenue by capitalizing on opportunities for shippers to reach additional markets, such as Chicago, Illinois, other parts of the Midwest, and Texas, through interconnects.


Kern River


Kern River an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, owns an interstate natural gas pipeline system that extends from supply areas in the Rocky Mountains to consuming markets in Utah, Nevada and California. Kern River provided 26% of California's demand for natural gas in 2016. Kern River's pipeline system consists of 1,700 miles of natural gas pipelines, includingoperates 1,400 miles of mainline section and 300 miles of common facilities,natural gas pipelines, with a year-round design capacity of 2,166,575 Dth,Dths, or 2.12.2 Bcf, per day. Kern River owns the entireAdditional seasonal design capacity (Bell-Curve) is contracted in all months except July, August and September. The mainline section, whichpipeline extends from the system's point of origination near Opal, Wyoming, through the Central Rocky Mountains intoto Daggett, California. The mainline section consists of 1,300 miles of 36-inch diameter pipeline and 100 miles of various laterals that connect to the mainline. The common facilities are jointly owned by Kern River primarily transports and Mojave Pipeline Company ("Mojave") as tenants-in-common. Except for quantities ofstores natural gas owned for operational purposes, Kern River does not own the naturalutilities, municipalities, gas that is transported through its system. marketing companies, industrial and commercial users.

Kern River's transportation rates are cost-based. The rates are designed to provide Kern River with an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and earn a reasonable return on its investments.

Kern River's ratesinvestments and are based on a levelized rate design with recovery of 70% of the original investment during the initial long-term contracts ("Period One rates"). After expiration of the initial term, eligible customers have the option to elect service at rates ("Period Two rates") that are lower than Period One rates because they are designed to recover the remaining 30% of the original investment. To the extent that eligible customers electeddo not to contract for service at Period Two rates, the volumes are turned back to Kern River, and soldit resells capacity at market rates for varying terms. As of December 31, 2017, Kern River has sold 212,417 Dth per day of total turned back volume of 378,503 Dth per day with an average remaining contract term of nearly four years. The remaining turned back capacity is sold on a short-term basis at market rates. Of the customers that are eligible to take Period Two service beginning May 1, 2018, 40% elected to extend their contracts at maximum Period Two rates, with 233,000 Dth per day electing 10-year contracts and 39,000 Dth per day electing 15-year contracts.

As of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately 87% of Kern River's design capacity, of 2,166,575 Dthincluding seasonal bell curve, totaled 2,345,381 Dths per day and is contracted pursuant to long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements, whereby Kern River receives natural gas on behalf of customers at designated receipt points and transports the natural gas on a firm basis to designated delivery points. In return for this service, each customer pays Kern River a fixed monthly reservation fee based on each customer's maximum daily quantity, which represents 94%nearly 81% of total operating revenue, and a commodity charge based on the actual amount of natural gas transported pursuant to its long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements and Kern River's tariff.

These long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements expire between March 2018February 2023 and April 2033October 2036 and have a weighted-average remaining contract term of over nineeight years. Kern River's customers include electric and natural gas distribution utilities, major oil and natural gas companies or affiliates of such companies, electric generating companies, energy marketing and trading companies and financial institutions. As of December 31, 2017, nearly 78%2022, 74% of the firmyear-round design capacity of 2,166,575 Dths under firm contract has primary delivery points in California, with the flexibility to access secondary delivery points in Nevada and Utah.


Except for quantities of natural gas owned for operational purposes, Kern River does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system. Kern River's transportation rates are cost-based.

During 2017,2022, Kern River had one customer,two customers, including Nevada Power Company, an affiliateaffiliated company, whothat each accounted for greater than 10% of its revenue. The loss of thisthese significant customer,customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on Kern River.


Competition

The Pipeline Companies compete with other pipelines on the basis of cost, flexibility, reliability of service and overall customer service, with the end-user's decision being made primarily on the basis of delivered price, which includes both the natural gas commodity cost and its transportation cost. Natural gas also competes with alternative energy sources, including coal, nuclear energy, wind, geothermal, solar and fuel oil. Legislation and governmental regulations, the weather, the futures market, production costs and other factors beyond the control of the Pipeline Companies influence the price of the natural gas commodity.

The natural gas industry has undergone a significant shift in supply sources. Production from conventional sources has declined while production from unconventional sources, such as shale gas, has increased. This shift has affected the supply patterns, the flows, the locational and seasonal natural gas price spreads and rates that can be charged on pipeline systems. The impact has varied among pipelines according to the location and the number of competitors attached to these new supply sources.


Electric power generation has been the source of most of the growth in demand for natural gas over the last 10 years, and this trend is expected to continue in the future. The growth of natural gas in this sector is influenced by regulation, new sources of natural gas, competition with other energy sources, primarily coal and renewables, and increased consumption of electricity as a result of economic growth. Short-term market shifts have been driven by relative costs of coal-fueled generation versus natural gas-fueled generation. A long-term market shift away from the use of coal in power generation could be driven by environmental regulations. The future demand for natural gas could be increased by regulations limiting or discouraging coal use. However, natural gas demand could potentially be adversely affected by laws mandating or encouraging renewable power sources that produce fewer GHG emissions than natural gas.

The Pipeline Companies' ability to extend existing customer contracts, remarket expiring contracted capacity or market new capacity is dependent on competitive alternatives, the regulatory environment and the market supply and demand factors at the relevant dates these contracts are eligible to be renewed or extended. The duration of new or renegotiated contracts will be affected by current commodity and transportation prices, competitive conditions and customers' judgments concerning future market trends and volatility.

Subject to regulatory requirements, the Pipeline Companies attempt to recontract or remarket capacity at the maximum rates allowed under their tariffs, although at times the Pipeline Companies discount these rates to remain competitive. The Pipeline Companies' existing contracts mature at various times and in varying amounts of entitlement. The Pipeline Companies manage the recontracting process to mitigate the risk of a significant negative impact on operating revenue.

Historically, the Pipeline Companies have been able to provide competitively priced services because of access to a variety of relatively low cost supply basins, cost control measures and the relatively high level of firm entitlement that is sold on a seasonal and annual basis, which lowers the per unit cost of transportation. To date, the Pipeline Companies have avoided significant pipeline system bypasses.

Northern Natural Gas needs to compete aggressively to serve existing load and add new load. Northern Natural Gas has been successful in competing for a significant amount of the increased demand related to residential and commercial needs and the construction of new power plants and new fertilizer or other industrial plants. The growth related to utilities has historically been driven by population growth and increased commercial and industrial needs. Northern Natural Gas has been generally successful in negotiating increased transportation rates for customers who received discounted service when such contract terms are renegotiated and extended.

Northern Natural Gas' major competitors in the Market Area include ANR Pipeline Company, Northern Border, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC, Great Lakes and Viking. In the Field Area, where the vast majority of Northern Natural Gas' capacity is used for transportation services provided on a short-term firm basis, Northern Natural Gas competes with a large number of interstate and intrastate pipeline companies.

Northern Natural Gas' attractive competitive position relative to other pipelines in the upper Midwest was reinforced during the colder than normal winter of 2013-2014. Northern Natural Gas' customers' ability to access multiple supply basins has been critical to customers managing their reliability and supply costs. Northern Natural Gas' Field Area has access to diverse Mid-Continent, Permian and Rockies supplies with resulting prices delivered to Market Area customers at Demarcation significantly less than their alternative supply source.

Northern Natural Gas expects the current level of Field Area contracting to Demarc to continue in the foreseeable future, as Market Area customers presently need to purchase competitively-priced supplies from the Field Area to support their existing and growth demand requirements. However, the revenue received from these Field Area contracts is expected to vary in relationship to the difference, or "spread," in natural gas prices between the MidContinent and Permian Regions and the price of the alternative supplies that are available to Northern Natural Gas' Market Area. This spread affects the value of the Field Area transportation capacity because natural gas from the MidContinent and Permian Regions that is transported through Northern Natural Gas' Field Area competes directly with natural gas delivered directly into the Market Area from Canada and other supply areas, including new shale gas producing areas outside of the Field Area.



Kern River competes with various interstate pipelines in developing expansion projects and entering into long-term agreements to serve market growth in Southern California; Las Vegas, Nevada; and Salt Lake City, Utah. Kern River also competes with various interstate pipelines and their customers to market unutilized capacity under shorter term transactions. Kern River provides its customers with supply diversity through interconnections with pipelines such as Northwest Pipeline LLC, Colorado Interstate Gas Company, Overland Trails Transmission, LLC, Questar Pipeline LLC and Questar Overthrust Pipeline LLC; and storage facilities such as Ryckman Creek Resources, LLC and Clear Creek Storage Company, LLC. These interconnections, in addition to the direct interconnections to natural gas processing facilities in Wyoming and California, allow Kern River to access natural gas reserves in Colorado, northwestern New Mexico, Wyoming, Utah, California and the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin.

Kern River is the only interstate pipeline that presently delivers natural gas directly from the Rocky Mountain gas supply region to end-users in the Southern California market. This enables direct connect customers to avoid paying a "rate stack" (i.e., additional transportation costs attributable to the movement from one or more interstate pipeline systems to an intrastate system within California). Kern River's levelized rate structure and access to upstream pipelines, storage facilities and economic Rocky Mountain gas reserves increases its competitiveness and attractiveness to end-users. Kern River believes it has an advantage relative to other interstate pipelines serving Southern California because its relatively new pipeline can be economically expanded and has required significantly less capital expenditures and ongoing maintenance than other systems to comply with the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002. Kern River's favorable market position is tied to the availability of gas reserves in the Rocky Mountain area, an area that in recent years has attracted considerable expansion of pipeline capacity serving markets other than Southern California and Nevada.

BHE TRANSMISSION


AltaLink

ALP,BHE Transmission consists of BHE Canada, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, acquiredBHE U.S. Transmission, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, ownership interests in generating facilities and 300 MWs of long-term northbound transmission rights on December 1, 2014,the Montana Alberta Tie Line (commencing April 30, 2026). BHE Canada and BHE U.S. Transmission together own and operate the Montana Alberta Tie Line, which is a 214-mile, 230-kV transmission line that runs from Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada to Great Falls, Montana, U.S. and connects power grids in the two jurisdictions.

BHE Canada

BHE Canada primarily owns AltaLink, a regulated electric transmission-onlytransmission utility company headquartered in Alberta, Canada serving approximately 85% of Alberta's population. ALP connects generation plantsAltaLink's high voltage transmission lines and related facilities transmit electricity from generating facilities to major load centers, cities and large industrial plants throughout its 87,000 square mile service territory, which covers a diverse geographic area including most major urban centers in central and southern Alberta. ALP'sAltaLink's transmission facilities, consisting of approximately 8,1008,300 miles of transmission lines and approximately 310 substations as of December 31, 2017,2022, are an integral part of the Alberta IntegratedInterconnected Electric System ("AIES").


The AIES is a network or grid of transmission facilities operating at high voltages ranging from 69kV69 kV to 500kV.500 kV. The grid delivers electricity from generating units across Alberta, Canada through approximately 16,000 miles of transmission.transmission lines. The AIES is interconnected to British Columbia's transmission system that links Alberta with the North American western interconnected system, interconnection with Saskatchewan's transmission system and interconnection with Montana's transmission system.


ALP
33


AltaLink is a transmission facility owner within the electricity industry in Alberta and is permitted to charge a tariff rate for the use of its transmission facilities. Such tariff rates are established on a cost-of-service basis,regulatory model, which areis designed to allow ALPAltaLink an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its investments. Transmission tariffstariff rates are approved by the AUC and are collected from the AESO.


The electricity industry in Alberta consists of four principal segments. Generators sell wholesale power into the power pool operated by the AESO and through direct contractual arrangements. Alberta's transmission system or grid is composed of high voltage power lines and related facilities that transmit electricity from generating facilities to distribution networks and directly connected end-users. Distribution facility owners are regulated by the AUC and are responsible for arranging for, or providing, regulated rate and regulated default supply services to convey electricity from transmission systems and distribution-connected generators to end-use customers. Retailers can procure energy through the power pool, through direct contractual arrangements with energy suppliers or ownership of generation facilities and arrange for its distribution to end-use customers.



The AESO mandate is defined in the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) and its regulations and requires the AESO to assess both current and future needs of Alberta's interconnected electrical system. In July 2017,January 2022, the AESO released the 2017 Long-Term Outlook ("LTO"), which is a forecast used as one input to guide2022 Long-term Transmission Plan. Updated every two years, the AESO in planning Alberta's transmission system. In January 2018, the AESO finalized and made available the 2017 Long-Term Transmission Plan ("LTP"). The 2017 LTP places increased focus onseeks to optimize the evolving economy, policy changesuse of the existing transmission system and environmental initiatives, including renewable generation additions andplan the phase-outdevelopment of coal-fueled generation whenever possible. The plan was developed with the goal of efficient utilization of existing and planned transmission systems in areas where high renewables potential exists, and timely addition of necessary new transmission developments.to ensure a safe and reliable electricity system that enables a fair, efficient and openly competitive electricity market. The AESO has forecast Alberta's electricity demand2022 Long-Term Transmission Plan identifies C$1.3 billion in transmission projects over a 10 year period, which results in C$150 million to grow at an annualC$200 million per year on average over that 10 year period. This results in a cumulative transmission rate impact of 0.9 percent until 2037. Future generation investments are expectedC$2 per MWh for the first five to keep pace with load growth and coal-fueled generation replacements, as well as generation additions primarily through the Renewable Electricity Program.eight years, increasing to C$3 per MWh after 15 years. The 2017 LTPLong-Term Transmission Plan identifies 15 transmission developments across Alberta proposed over the next five years valued at approximately C$1 billion. Regulatory approval for all identified developments is still required.900 million of projects in AltaLink's service territory with in-service dates before 2030.

BHE U.S. Transmission


BHE U.S. Transmission is engaged in various joint ventures to develop, own and operate transmission assets and is pursuing additional investment opportunities in the United States.U.S. Currently, BHE U.S. Transmission has two joint ventures with transmission assets that are operational.

BHE U.S. Transmission indirectly ownsoperational, ETT, a 50% interest in ETT, alongowned joint venture with subsidiaries of American Electric Power Company, Inc. ("AEP")., and Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC, a 25% owned joint venture with AEP and Evergy, Inc. ETT owns and operates electric transmission assets in the ERCOT and, as of December 31, 2017,2022, had total assets of $3.0$3.5 billion. ETT is regulated by the Public Utility Commission of Texas. A total of $2.9 billion of transmission projects were in-service as of December 31, 2017, with $0.2 billion of projects forecast to be completed in 2018 through 2021. ETT's transmission system includes approximately 1,2001,900 miles of transmission lines and 3642 substations as of December 31, 2017.

BHE U.S. Transmission also indirectly owns a 25% interest in2022. Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC, a joint venture with AEPowns and Westar Energy, Inc., to build, own and operateoperates a 108-mile, 345 kV345-kV transmission project in Kansas. The project cost $158Kansas having total assets of $133 million as of December 31, 2022.

Generating Facilities

BHE Transmission has ownership interests in the following generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:

PowerFacilityNet
PurchaseNetOwned
EnergyYearAgreementPowerCapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationSourceInstalledExpirationPurchaser
(MWs)(1)
(MWs)(1)
WIND:
RattlesnakeAlbertaWind20222042/2032Telus, RBC, Bullfrog, Shopify130 130 
Rim RockMontanaWind20122026Morgan Stanley189 189 
Glacier 1MontanaWind2008N/AN/A107 107 
Glacier 2MontanaWind2009N/AN/A103 103 
529 529 
NATURAL GAS:
Nat-1AlbertaNatural gas2015N/AN/A20 20 
20 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity549 549 
34


(1)    Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other     agreements for intermittent resources and was fully placed in-service in November 2014.the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates BHE Transmission' ownership of Facility Net Capacity.



BHE RENEWABLES


The subsidiaries comprising the BHE Renewables reportable segment own interests in several independent power projects that are in-service or under construction in the United States and in the Philippines.U.S. The following table presents certain information concerning these independent power projects as of December 31, 2017:2022:

PowerFacilityNet
PurchaseNetOwned
EnergyYearAgreementPowerCapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationSourceInstalledExpiration
Purchaser(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
WIND:
Grande PrairieNebraskaWind20162036OPPD400 400 
Jumbo RoadTexasWind20152033AE300 300 
Santa RitaTexasWind20182025-2038KC, CODTX, MES300 300 
Mariah Del NorteTexasWind2016N/AN/A230 230 
Walnut RidgeIllinoisWind20182028USGSA212 212 
Flat TopTexasWind20192031Citi Commodities200 200 
Pinyon Pines ICaliforniaWind20122035SCE168 168 
Fluvanna IITexasWind20192024JP Morgan158 158 
Pinyon Pines IICaliforniaWind20122035SCE132 132 
Bishop Hill IIIllinoisWind20122032Ameren81 81 
MarshallKansasWind20162036MJMEC, KPP, KMEA & COIMO72 72 
IndependenceIowaWind20212041CIPCO54 54 
2,307 2,307 
SOLAR:
TopazCaliforniaSolar2013-20142039PG&E550 550 
Solar Star 1CaliforniaSolar2013-20152035SCE310 310 
Solar Star 2CaliforniaSolar2013-20152035SCE276 276 
Agua CalienteArizonaSolar2012-20132039PG&E290 142 
Alamo 6TexasSolar20172042CPS110 110 
Community Solar Gardens(5)
MinnesotaSolar2016-20182041-2043(4)98 98 
PearlTexasSolar20172042CPS50 50 
1,684 1,536 
NATURAL GAS:
CordovaIllinoisNatural Gas2001N/AN/A512 512 
Power ResourcesTexasNatural Gas1988N/AN/A212 212 
SaranacNew YorkNatural Gas1994N/AN/A245 196 
YumaArizonaNatural Gas19942024SDG&E50 50 
1,019 970 
GEOTHERMAL:
Imperial Valley ProjectsCaliforniaGeothermal1982-2000(3)(3)345 345 
345 345 
HYDROELECTRIC:
WailukuHawaiiHydroelectric19932023HELCO10 10 
10 10 
Total Available Generating Capacity5,365 5,168 

35


        Power   Facility Net
        Purchase   Net Owned
    Energy   Agreement Power Capacity Capacity
Generating Facility Location Source Installed Expiration 
Purchaser(1)
 
(MW)(2)
 
(MW)(2)
SOLAR:              
Topaz California Solar 2013-2014 2040 PG&E 550
 550
Solar Star 1 California Solar 2013-2015 2035 SCE 310
 310
Solar Star 2 California Solar 2013-2015 2035 SCE 276
 276
Agua Caliente Arizona Solar 2012-2013 2039 PG&E 290
 142
Community Solar Gardens(6)
 Minnesota Solar 2016-2017 2041-2042 (5) 74
 74
Alamo 6 Texas Solar 2017 2042 CPS 110
 110
Pearl Texas Solar 2017 2042 CPS 50
 50
            1,660
 1,512
WIND:              
Bishop Hill II Illinois Wind 2012 2032 Ameren 81
 81
Pinyon Pines I California Wind 2012 2035 SCE 168
 168
Pinyon Pines II California Wind 2012 2035 SCE 132
 132
Jumbo Road Texas Wind 2015 2033 AE 300
 300
Marshall Kansas Wind 2016 2036 MJMEC, KPP, KMEA & COIMO 72
 72
Grand Prairie Nebraska Wind 2016 2036 OPPD 400
 400
            1,153
 1,153
GEOTHERMAL:              
Imperial Valley Projects California Geothermal 1982-2000 (3) (3) 338
 338
               
HYDROELECTRIC:              
Casecnan Project(4)
 Philippines Hydroelectric 2001 2021 NIA 150
 128
Wailuku Hawaii Hydroelectric 1993 2023 HELCO 10
 10
            160
 138
NATURAL GAS:              
Saranac New York Natural Gas 1994 2019 TEMUS 245
 196
Power Resources Texas Natural Gas 1988 2018 EDF 212
 212
Yuma Arizona Natural Gas 1994 2024 SDG&E 50
 50
Cordova Illinois Natural Gas 2001 2019 EGC 512
 512
            1,019
 970
               
Total Available Generating Capacity           4,330
 4,111
               
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION:            
               
Community Solar Gardens Minnesota Solar 2018 2043 (5) 24
 24
Walnut Ridge Illinois Wind 2018 2028 USGSA 212
 212
            236
 236
               
            4,566
 4,347
(1)San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E"); Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), Ameren Illinois Company ("Ameren"), Southern California Edison ("SCE"), Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. ("HELCO"); Austin Energy ("AE"); Omaha Public Power District ("OPPD"); Kimberly-Clark Corporation ("KC"); City of Denton, TX ("CODTX"); MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC ("MES"); U.S. General Services Administration ("USGSA"); Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Commission ("MJMEC"); Kansas Power Pool ("KPP"); Kansas Municipal Energy Agency ("KMEA"); City of Independence, MO ("COIMO"); CPS Energy ("CPS"); and Central Iowa Power Cooperative ("CIPCO").

(2)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates BHE Renewables' ownership of Facility Net Capacity.

(1)
TransAlta Energy Marketing U.S. ("TEMUS"); EDF Energy Services, LLC ("EDF"); San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E"); Exelon Generation Company, LLC ("EGC"); Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), Ameren Illinois Company ("Ameren"), Southern California Edison ("SCE"), the Philippine National Irrigation Administration ("NIA"); Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. ("HELCO"); Austin Energy ("AE"); Omaha Public Power District ("OPPD"); U.S. General Services Administration ("USGSA"); Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Commission ("MJMEC"); Kansas Power Pool ("KPP"); Kansas Municipal Energy Agency ("KMEA"); City of Independence, MO ("COIMO"); and CPS Energy ("CPS").
(2)
Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MW) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates BHE Renewables' ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
(3)
The majority of the Imperial Valley Projects' Contract Capacity is currently sold to Southern California Edison Company under long-term power purchase agreements expiring in 2018 through 2026. Certain long-term power purchase agreement renewals have been entered into with other parties that begin upon the existing contracts' expiration and expire in 2039.

(4)
Under the terms of the agreement with the NIA, CalEnergy Philippines will own and operate the Casecnan project for a 20-year cooperation period which ends December 11, 2021, after which ownership and operation of the project will be transferred to the NIA at no cost on an "as-is" basis. NIA also pays CalEnergy Philippines for delivery of water pursuant to the agreement.

(5)The power purchasers are commercial, industrial and not-for-profit organizations.

(6)The community solar gardens project is consolidated in the table above for convenience as it consists of 74 distinct entities that each own an approximately 1 MW solar garden with independent but substantially similar terms and conditions.

(3)Approximately 12% of the Company's interests in the Imperial Valley Projects' Contract Capacity are currently sold to Southern California Edison Company under a long-term power purchase agreement expiring in 2026. Certain long-term power purchase agreement renewals for 252 MWs have been entered into with other parties at fixed prices that expire from 2028 to 2039, of which 202 MWs mature in 2039.
Additionally, BHE Renewables has invested $1.2 billion(4)The power purchasers are commercial, industrial and not-for-profit organizations.
(5)The community solar gardens project is consolidated in seven wind projects sponsored by third parties, commonly referred tothe table above for convenience as tax equity investments.it consists of 98 distinct entities that each own an approximately 1-MW solar garden with independent but substantially similar terms and conditions.


BHE Renewables' operating revenue is derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 (inwere as follows (dollars in millions):
202220212020
Solar$477 48 %$468 48 %$455 48 %
Wind228 23 160 16 183 20 
Geothermal212 21 178 18 173 18 
Hydro32 26 
Natural gas71 143 15 99 11 
Total operating revenue$993 100 %$981 100 %$936 100 %
 2017 2016 2015
      
Solar52% 49% 52%
Wind17
 19
 14
Geothermal19
 20
 23
Hydro6
 4
 3
Natural gas6
 8
 8
Total operating revenue100
 100% 100%


HOMESERVICES


HomeServices, a majority-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is one of the second-largestlargest residential real estate brokerage firmfirms in the United States.U.S. In addition to providing traditional residential real estate brokerage services, HomeServices offers other integrated real estate services, including mortgage originations and mortgage banking; title and closing services; property and casualty insurance; home warranties; relocation services; and other home-related services. HomeServices' real estate brokerage business is subject to seasonal fluctuations because more home sale transactions tend to close during the second and third quarters of the year. As a result, HomeServices' operating results and profitability are typically higher in the second and third quarters relative to the remainder of the year. HomeServices' owned brokerages currently operate in nearly 840930 offices in 3033 states and the District of Columbia with nearly 41,000approximately 45,000 real estate agents under 4255 brand names. The United StatesU.S. residential real estate brokerage business is subject to the general real estate market conditions, is highly competitive and consists of numerous local brokers and agents in each market seeking to represent sellers and buyers in residential real estate transactions. In October 2014, HomeServices acquired the remaining 50.1% of HomeServices Lending, a mortgage origination company.


In October 2012, HomeServices acquired a 66.7% interest in one of the largest residential real estate brokerage franchise networks in the United States, which offers and sells independently owned and operated residential real estate brokerage franchises. The noncontrolling interest member has the right to put the remaining 33.3% interest in the franchise business to HomeServices after March 2015 and HomeServices has the right to call the remaining 33.3% interest in the franchise business after completion and receipt of the 2017 financial statement audit at an option exercise formula based on historical financial performance.


HomeServices' franchise network currently includes over 365approximately 300 franchisees inand over 1,500 brokerage offices in 47 states with over 48,000nearly 51,000 real estate agents under threetwo brand names.names, primarily in the U.S. In exchange for certain fees, HomeServices provides the right to use the Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Prudential or Real Living brand names and other related service marks, as well as providing orientation programs, training and consultation services, advertising programs and other services.


OTHER ENERGY BUSINESSES

Effective January 1, 2016, MidAmerican Energy Company transferred its nonregulated energy operations to MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC ("MES"), a subsidiary of BHE. MES is a nonregulated energy business consisting of competitive electricity and natural gas retail sales. MES' electric operations predominantly include sales to retail customers in Illinois, Texas, Ohio, Maryland and other states that allow customers to choose their energy supplier. MES' natural gas operations predominantly include sales to retail customers in Iowa and Illinois. Electricity and natural gas are purchased from producers and third party energy marketing companies and sold directly to commercial, industrial and governmental end-users. MES does not own electricity or natural gas production assets but hedges its contracted sales obligations either with physical supply arrangements or financial products. As of December 31, 2017, MES' contracts in place for the sale of electricity totaled 19,225 GWh with a weighted average life of 2.1 years and for the sale of natural gas totaled 28,605,700 Dth with a weighted average life of 1.3 years. In addition, MES manages natural gas supplies for a number of smaller commercial end-users, which includes the sale of natural gas to these customers to meet their supply requirements. Refer to Item 7A in this Form 10-K for a discussion of commodity price risk and derivative contracts.

The percentages of electricity sold to MES' retail customers by state for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
      
Illinois46% 48% 51%
Ohio23
 21
 18
Texas15
 13
 15
Maryland7
 7
 7
Other9
 11
 9
 100% 100% 100%

The percentages of natural gas sold to MES' customers by state for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
 2017 2016 2015
      
Iowa86% 86% 87%
Illinois9
 9
 8
Other5
 5
 5
 100% 100% 100%



GENERAL REGULATION


BHE's regulated subsidiaries and certain affiliates are subject to comprehensive governmental regulation, which significantly influences their operating environment, prices charged to customers, capital structure, costs and, ultimately, their ability to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on invested capital. In addition to the discussion contained herein regarding general regulation, refer to "Regulatory Matters" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding certain regulatory matters.


Domestic Regulated Public Utility Subsidiaries


The Utilities are subject to comprehensive regulation by various state, federal and local agencies. The more significant aspects of this regulatory framework are described below.


36


State Regulation


Historically, state regulatory commissions have established retail electric and natural gas rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow a utility the opportunity to recover what each state regulatory commission deems to be the utility's reasonable costs of providing services, including a fair opportunity to earn a reasonable return on its investments based on its cost of debt and equity. In addition to return on investment, a utility's cost of service generally reflects a representative level of prudent expenses, including cost of sales, operating expense, depreciation and amortization and income and other tax expense, reduced by wholesale electricity and other revenue. The allowed operating expenses are typically based on actual historical costs adjusted for known and measurable or forecasted changes. State regulatory commissions may adjust cost of service for various reasons, including pursuant to a review of: (a) the utility's revenue and expenses during a defined test period, (b) the utility's level of investment and (c) changes in income tax laws. State regulatory commissions typically have the authority to review and change rates on their own initiative; however, they may also initiate reviews at the request of a utility, utility customers or organizations representing groups of customers. In certain jurisdictions, the utility and such parties, however, may agree with one another not to request a review of or changes to rates for a specified period of time.


The retail electric rates of the Utilities are generally based on the cost of providing traditional bundled services, including generation, transmission and distribution services. The Utilities have established energy cost adjustment mechanismsECAMs and other cost recovery mechanisms in certain states, which help mitigate their exposure to changes in costs from those assumed in establishing base rates.


With certain limited exceptions, the Utilities have an exclusive right to serve retail customers within their service territories and, in turn, have an obligation to provide service to those customers. In some jurisdictions, certain classes of customers may choose to purchase all or a portion of their energy from alternative energy suppliers, and in some jurisdictions retail customers can generate all or a portion of their own energy. Under Oregon law, PacifiCorp has the exclusive right and obligation to provide electricity distribution services to all residential and nonresidential customers within its allocated service territory; however, nonresidential customers have the right to choose an alternative provider of energy supply. The impact of this right on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results has not been material. In Washington, state law does not provide for exclusive service territory allocation. PacifiCorp's service territory in Washington is surrounded by other public utilities with whom PacifiCorp has from time to time entered into service area agreements under the jurisdiction of the WUTC. Under California law, PacifiCorp has the exclusive right and obligation to provide electricity distribution services to all residential and nonresidential customers within its allocated service territory; however, cities, counties and certain other public agencies have the right to choose to generate energy supply or elect an alternative provider of energy supply through the formation of a Community Choice Aggregator ("CCA"). To date, no CCA activity has occurred in PacifiCorp's California service territory. If a CCA is formed, PacifiCorp would continue to provide CCA customers transmission, distribution, metering and billing services and the CCA would provide generation supply. In addition, PacifiCorp would likely be able to collect costs from CCA customers for the generation-related costs that PacifiCorp incurred while they were customers of PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp would remain the electricity provider of last resort for these customers. In Illinois, state law has established a competitive environment so that all Illinois customers are free to choose their retail service supplier. For customers that choose an alternative retail energy supplier, MidAmerican Energy continues to have an ongoing obligation to deliver the supplier's energy to the retail customer. MidAmerican Energy bills the retail customer for such delivery services. MidAmerican Energy also has an obligation to serve customers at regulated cost-based rates and has a continuing obligation to serve customers who have not selected a competitive electricity provider. The impact of this right on MidAmerican Energy's financial results has not been material. In Nevada, state lawChapter 704B of the Nevada Revised Statutes allows retail electric customers with an average annual load of one MW or more to file a letter of intent and application with the PUCN to acquire electric energy and ancillary services from another energy supplier. The law requires customers wishing to choose a new supplier to receive the approval of the PUCN to meet public interest standards. In particular, departing customers must secure new energy resources that are not under contract to the Nevada Utilities, the departure must not burden the Nevada Utilities with increased costs or cause any remaining customers to pay increased costs and the departing customers must pay their portion of any deferred energy balances, all as determined by the PUCN. SB 547 revised Chapter 704B to establish limits on the amount of load eligible to take service under Chapter 704B and to set those limits as a part of the IRP filed by the Nevada Utilities. Also, the Utilities and the state regulatory commissions are individually evaluating how best to integrate private generation resources into their service and rate design, including considering such factors as maintaining high levels of customer safety and service reliability, minimizing adverse cost impacts and fairly allocating costs among all customers.


Also inIn Nevada, large natural gas customers using 12,000 therms per month with fuel switching capability are allowed to participate in the incentive natural gas rate tariff. Once a service agreement has been executed, a customer can compare natural gas prices under this tariff to alternative energy sources and choose its source of natural gas. In addition, natural gas customers using greater than 1,000 therms per day have the ability to secure their own natural gas supplies under the gas transportation tariff.


37


PacifiCorp


Rate Filings

Under Utah law, the UPSC must issue a written order within 240 days of a public utility's application for a general rate change. Absent an order, the proposed rates go into effect as filed and are not subject to refund, the UPSC may allow interim rates to take effect within 45 days of an application, subject to refund or surcharge, if an adequate prima facie showing is established in hearing that the interim rate change is justified.

In Oregon, the OPUC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates for a period not to exceed more than six months, with an additional three-month extension, beyond the 30-day time period when the new rates would otherwise go into effect. Absent suspension or other action from the OPUC, new rates automatically go into effect 30 days from filing by the utility. Upon suspension by the OPUC, the OPUC is authorized to allow the collection of an interim rate, subject to refund, during the pendency of the OPUC's review of the rate request.

In Wyoming, the WPSC can allow interim rates to go into effect 30 days after the initial application but may require a bond to secure a refund for the amount. The WPSC may suspend the rates for final approval for a period not to exceed 10 months.

In Washington, the WUTC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed 10 months beyond the 30-day time period when the new rate would otherwise go into effect.
Under Idaho law, the IPUC can suspend a filing for an initial period not to exceed five months and an additional extension of 60 days with a showing of good cause.

In California, the CPUC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed 18 months. The CPUC may extend the suspension period on a case-by-case basis.

Adjustment Mechanisms

In addition to recovery through base rates, PacifiCorp also achieves recovery of certain costs through various adjustment mechanisms as summarized below.
State RegulatorBase Rate Test PeriodAdjustment Mechanism
UPSC
Forecasted or historical with known and measurable changes(1)
EBA under which 100% (beginning in June 2016) of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. Wheeling revenue is also included in the mechanism. Prior to June 2016,Beginning in 2021, the amount deferred was 70%mechanism includes a true-up of the difference as noted above.PTCs at 100%.
Balancing account to provide for 100% recovery or refund of the difference between the level of REC revenues included in base rates and actual REC revenues after adjusting for a REC incentive authorized by the UPSC.
Recovery mechanism for single capital investments that in total exceed 1% of existing rate base when a general rate case has occurred within the preceding 18 months.
OPUCForecastedEffective January 1, 2021, Wildland Fire Mitigation Balancing Account to recover operating expenses and capital expenditures incurred to implement PacifiCorp's Utah Wildland Fire Protection Plan incremental to those included in base rates.
OPUCForecastedPCAM under which 90% of the difference between forecasted net variable power costs and production tax creditsPTCs established under the annual TAM and actual net variable power costs and production tax creditsPTCs is deferred and reflected in future rates. The difference between the forecasted and actual net variable power costs and production tax creditsPTCs must fall outside of an established asymmetrical deadband, rangewith a negative annual power cost variance deadband of $15 million; and a positive annual power cost variance deadband of $30 million and is also subject to an earnings test.test of +/- 1% on PacifiCorp's allowed return on equity.
Annual TAM based on forecasted net variable power costs and production tax credits. Production tax credits were not included in forecasted net variable power costs prior to 2017.PTCs.
Renewable Adjustment ClauseRAC to recover the revenue requirement of new renewable resources and associated transmission costs that are not reflected in general rates.
Balancing account for proceeds fromrecovery of costs associated with the salepurchase of RECs.RECs necessary to meet Oregon's RPS requirements.
WPSCEffective January 1, 2021, Annual Wildfire Mitigation and Vegetation Management Cost Recovery Mechanism approved through 2024 to recover vegetation management and wildfire mitigation operations and maintenance costs and wildfire mitigation capital costs, incremental to those included in base rates. Recovery is subject to performance metrics and earnings tests. After 2024, the mechanism will be assessed to determine whether continued use is warranted.
38


WPSC
Forecasted or historical with known and measurable changes(1)
ECAM under which 70%80% of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. ChemicalWithin the mechanism, chemical costs and start-up fuel costs are also included inat the mechanism starting in 2016.80% symmetrical sharing band and PTCs are included at 100% symmetrical sharing.
REC and sulfur dioxideSO2 revenue adjustment mechanism to provide for recovery or refund of 100% of any difference between actual REC and sulfur dioxideSO2 revenues and the level in rates.
WUTCHistorical with known and measurable changesPCAM under which the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates after applying a $4 million deadband for positive or negative net power cost variances. For net power cost variances between $4 million and $10 million, amounts to be recovered from customers are allocated 50/50 and amounts to be credited to customers are allocated 75/25 (customers/PacifiCorp). Positive or negative net power cost variances in excess of $10 million are allocated 90/10 (customers/PacifiCorp). Beginning in 2021, the mechanism includes a true-up of PTCs at 100%.
Deferral mechanism of costs for up to 24 months of new base load generation resources and eligible renewable resources and related transmission that qualify under the state's emissions performance standard and are not reflected in base rates.
REC revenue tracking mechanism to provide credit of 100% of Washington-allocated REC revenues.revenues to customers.
Decoupling mechanism under which the difference between actual annual revenues and authorized revenues per customer per specified rate schedules is deferred and reflected in future rates, subject to an earnings test. Under the earnings test, 50% of any proportional excess earnings over PacifiCorp's authorized return on equity is returned to customers in addition to any surcharge or surcredit related to the revenue variance. The earnings test is asymmetrical, and adjustments are not made when PacifiCorp earns at or below authorized returns on equity. To trigger a rate adjustment, the deferral balance must exceed plus or minus 2.5% of the authorized revenue at the end of each deferral period by rate class. Rate adjustments must not exceed a surcharge of 5% of the actual normalized revenue by class.


IPUCHistorical with known and measurable changesECAM under which 90% of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. Also provides for recovery or refund of 100% of the difference between the level of REC revenues included in base rates and actual REC revenues and differences in actual production tax creditsPTCs compared to the amount in base rates.
CPUCForecastedPTAM for major capital additions that allows for rate adjustments outside of the context of a traditional general rate case for the revenue requirement associated with capital additions exceeding $50 million on a total-company basis. Filed as eligible capital additions are placed into service.
ECAC that allows for an annual update to actual and forecasted net power costs.
PTAM for attrition, a mechanism that allows for an annual adjustment to costs other than net power costs.

(1)PacifiCorpCatastrophic Events Memorandum Account for catastrophic events, allows for deferral and cost recovery of reasonable costs incurred as the result of catastrophic events, which are events for which a state or federal agency has relied on both historical test periodsdeclared a state of emergency.
Fire Risk Mitigation Memorandum Account to track costs related to wildfire mitigation activities incremental to what is in base rates and Wildfire Mitigation Plan Memorandum Account to track costs associated with known and measurable adjustments, as well as forecasted test periods.the implementation of PacifiCorp's approved wildfire mitigation plan.



(1)PacifiCorp has relied on both historical test periods with known and measurable adjustments, as well as forecasted test periods.

MidAmerican Energy


Rate Filings

Under Iowa law, there are two options fora utility may implement temporary collection of higher rates, following the filing of a request for a base rate increase. Collection can begin,without IUB review and subject to refund, either (1) withinon or after 10 days of filing without IUB review, or (2) 90 days after filing, with approval by the IUB, depending upon the ratemaking principles and precedents utilized. In either case, ifa request for higher base rates. If the IUB has not issued a final order within ten10 months after the filing date, the temporary rates become final and any difference between the requested rate increase and the temporary rates may then be collected subject to refund until receipt of a final order.final. Under Illinois law, new base rates may become effective 45 days after the filing of a request with the ICC, or earlier with ICC approval. The ICC has authority to suspend the proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed approximately eleven11 months after filing. South Dakota law authorizes the SDPUC to suspend new base rates for up to six months during the pendency of rate proceedings; however, a utility may implement all or a portion of the proposed new rates six months after the filing of a request for a rate increase subject to refund pending a final order in the proceeding.


39


Iowa law also permits rate-regulated utilities to seek ratemaking principles with the IUB prior to the construction of certain types of new generating facilities. Pursuant to this law, MidAmerican Energy has applied for and obtained IUB ratemaking principles orders for a 484-MW (MidAmerican Energy's share) coal-fueled generating facility, a 495-MW combined cycle natural gas-fueled generating facility and 6,048 MW6,639 MWs (nominal ratings) of wind-powered generating facilities including 1,666 MW (nominal ratings) under construction, as of December 31, 2017.2022. These ratemaking principles established cost caps for the projects, below which such costs are deemed prudent by the IUB and authorized a fixed rate of return on equity for the respective generating facilities over the regulatory life of the facilities in any future Iowa rate proceeding. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the generating facilities in servicein-service totaled $5.9$7.6 billion, or 42%36%, of MidAmerican Energy's regulated property, plant and equipment, net and were subject to these ratemaking principles at a weighted average return on equity of 11.7%11.4% with a weighted average remaining life of 3132 years.


Ratemaking principles for several wind-powered generation projects have established mechanisms in Iowa where electric rate base may be reduced. The current revenue sharing mechanism is in accordance with Wind XII ratemaking principles and reduces rate base for Iowa electric returns on equity exceeding an established benchmark. Sharing is triggered by MidAmerican Energy's actual equity return being above a threshold calculated annually. The threshold, not to exceed 11%, is the weighted average equity return of rate base with returns authorized via ratemaking principles proceedings and all other rate base. For all other rate base, the return is based on interest rates on 30-year A-rated utility bond yields plus 400 basis points, with a minimum return of 9.5%. MidAmerican Energy shares with customers 90% of the revenue in excess of the trigger. A second mechanism, the retail customer benefit mechanism, reduces electric rate base for the value of higher cost retail energy displaced by covered wind-powered production and applies to the wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in 2016 under the Wind X project and facilities constructed under the Wind XII project approved by the IUB in 2018. Rate base reductions under these mechanisms are applied to coal and other generation facilities in specified orders.

Adjustment Mechanisms

Under its current Iowa, Illinois and South Dakota electric tariffs, MidAmerican Energy is allowed to recover fluctuations in electric energy costs for its retail electric sales through fuel, or energy, cost adjustment mechanisms. The Iowa mechanism also includes production tax credits associated with wind-powered generation placed in-service prior to 2013, except for production tax credits earned by repowered facilities, which totaled 414 MW as of December 31, 2017. Eligibility for production tax credits associated with MidAmerican Energy's earliest projects began expiring in 2014. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has transmission adjustment clauses to recover certain transmission charges related to retail customers in all jurisdictions. The transmission adjustment mechanisms recover costs billed by the MISO for regional transmission service. The Illinois adjustment mechanism additionally recovers MidAmerican Energy's entire transmission revenue requirement attributable to Illinois. The adjustment mechanisms reduce the regulatory lag for the recovery of energy and transmission costs related to retail electric customers in these jurisdictions.jurisdictions and accomplish, with limited timing differences, a pass-through of the related costs to these customers. Recoveries through these adjustment mechanisms are reflected in operating revenue, and the related costs are reflected in cost of fuel and energy or operations and maintenance expense, as applicable.


Of the wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service as of December 31, 2017, 2,097 MW2022, 5,022 MWs (nominal ratings) have not been included in the determination of MidAmerican Energy's Iowa retail electric base rates. In accordance with the related ratemaking principles, until such time as these generation assets are reflected in base rates and ceasing thereafter, MidAmerican Energy reducedwill continue to reduce its revenue from Iowa energy adjustment clause recoveries by $5 million in 2015 and $9 million in 2016 and is to reduce itsEAC recoveries by $12 million for each calendar year thereafter.year.

MidAmerican Energy has mechanisms in Iowa where rate base may be reduced, including revenue sharing and retail customer benefits attributable to most of the wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in 2016 ("Wind X"). The revenue sharing mechanism originates from multiple ratemaking principles proceedings and reduces rate base for Iowa electric returns on equity exceeding an established benchmark. The Wind X customer benefit mechanism reduces rate base for the value of higher cost retail energy displaced by Wind X production.


MidAmerican Energy's cost of natural gas purchased for resale is collected for each jurisdiction in its gas rates through a uniform PGA, which is updated monthly to reflect changes in actual costs. Subject to prudence reviews, the PGA accomplishes a pass-through of MidAmerican Energy's cost of natural gas purchased for resale to its customers and, accordingly, has no direct effect on net income.

MidAmerican Energy's DSMelectric and natural gas energy efficiency program costs are collected through separately established ratesbill riders that are adjusted annually based on actual and expected costs asin accordance with the energy efficiency plans filed with and approved by the respective state regulatory commission. As such, recovery of DSMthe energy efficiency program costs, haswhich are reflected in operations and maintenance expense, and related recoveries, which are reflected in operating revenue, have no direct impact on net income.



40


MidAmerican Energy has income tax rider mechanisms in Iowa and Illinois that were established in response to 2017 Tax Reform, which enacted significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, including, among other things, a reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. South Dakota implemented changes to base rates in response to 2017 Tax Reform. As a result of 2017 Tax Reform, MidAmerican Energy re-measured its accumulated deferred income tax balances at the 21% rate and increased regulatory liabilities pursuant to the approved mechanisms. In December 2018, the IUB approved in final form a tax expense revision mechanism that reduces customer electric rates for the impact of the lower income tax rate on current operations, as calculated annually, and defers the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes created by their re-measurement at the 21% income tax rate to a regulatory liability, the disposition of which will be determined in MidAmerican Energy's next rate case. In 2018, Iowa Senate File 2417 was signed into law, which, among other items, reduced the state of Iowa corporate tax rate from 12% to 9.8% effective in 2021, at which time, the impacts of Iowa Senate File 2417 began to be included in the Iowa tax expense revision mechanism.

NV Energy (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific)


Rate Filings


Nevada statutes require the Nevada Utilities to file electric general rate cases at least once every three years with the PUCN. Sierra Pacific may also file natural gas general rate cases with the PUCN. The Nevada Utilities are also subject to a two-part fuel and purchased power adjustment mechanism. The Nevada Utilities make quarterly filings to reset BTER,the BTERs, based on the last 12 months of fuel and purchased power costs. The difference between actual fuel and purchased power costs and the revenue collected in the BTERBTERs is deferred into a balancing account. The DEAA rate clears amounts deferred into the balancing account. Nevada regulations allow an electric or natural gas utility that adjusts its BTERBTERs on a quarterly basis to request PUCN approval to make quarterly changes to its DEAA rate if the request is in the public interest. The Nevada Utilities received approval from the PUCN and file quarterly adjustments to the DEAA rate to clear amounts deferred into the balancing account. During required annual DEAA proceedings, the prudence of fuel and purchased power costs is reviewed, and if any costs are disallowed on such grounds, the disallowances will be incorporated into the next quarterly BTER rateBTERs change. Also, on an annual basis, the Nevada Utilities (a) seek a determination that energy efficiency program expenditures were reasonable, (b) request that the PUCN reset base and amortization energy efficiency program rates,EEPR, and (c) request that the PUCN reset base and amortization EEIR.

            EEPR and EEIR

EEPR was established to allow the Nevada Utilities to recover the costs of implementing energy efficiency programs and EEIR was established to offset the negative impacts on revenue associated with the successful implementation rates.of energy efficiency programs. These rates change once a year in the utility's annual DEAA application based on energy efficiency program budgets prepared by the Nevada Utilities and approved by the PUCN in the IRP proceedings. When the Nevada Utilities' regulatory earned rate of return for a calendar year exceeds the regulatory rate of return used to set base tariff general rates, they are obligated to refund energy efficiency implementation revenue previously collected for that year.


Energy Choice Initiative - Deregulation            Net Metering


In November 2016,Nevada enacted Assembly Bill 405 ("AB 405") on June 15, 2017. The legislation, among other things, established net metering crediting rates for private generation customers with installed net metering systems less than 25 kilowatts. Under AB 405, private generation customers will be compensated for excess energy on a majoritymonthly basis at 95% of the rate the customer would have paid for a kilowatt-hour of electricity supplied by the Nevada voters supportedUtilities for the first 80 MWs of cumulative installed capacity of all net metering systems in Nevada, 88% of the rate for the next 80 MWs, 81% of the rate for the next 80 MWs and 75% of the rate for any additional private generation capacity. As of December 31, 2022, the cumulative installed and applied-for capacity of net metering systems under AB 405 in Nevada was 583 MWs.

            Natural Disaster Protection Plan ("NDPP")

SB 329, Natural Disaster Mitigation Measures, was signed into law on May 22, 2019. The legislation requires the Nevada Utilities to submit a ballot measureNDPP to amend Articlethe PUCN. The PUCN adopted NDPP regulations on January 29, 2020, that require the Nevada Utilities to file their NDPP for approval on or before March 1 of every third year. The regulations also require annual updates to be filed on or before September 1 of the Nevada Constitution. If approved again in 2018,second and third years of the proposed constitutional amendment would requireplan. The plan must include procedures, protocols and other certain information as it relates to the efforts of the Nevada LegislatureUtilities to create,prevent or respond to a fire or other natural disaster. The expenditures incurred by the Nevada Utilities in developing and implementing the NDPP are required to be held in a regulatory asset account, with the Nevada Utilities filing an application for recovery on or before July 2023, an openMarch 1 of each year. The PUCN reopened its investigation and competitive retail electric market that includes provisions to reduce costs to customers, protect against service disconnectionsrulemaking on SB 329 and unfair practices and prohibit the granting of monopolies and exclusive franchisescomment period for the generation of electricity. The outcome of any customer choice initiative could have broad implications to the Nevada Utilities. The Governor issued an executive order establishing the Governor's Committee on Energy Choicereopened investigation ended in which the Nevada Utilities have representation. The Nevada Utilities have been engaged in the legislative process before the Governor's committee and related proceedings before the PUCN and the legislature. The Nevada Utilities cannot assess or predict the outcome of the potential constitutional amendment or the financial impact, if any, at this time. The uncertainty created by the ballot initiative complicates both the short-term allocation of resources and long-term resource planning for the Nevada Utilities, including the ability to forecast load growth and the timing of resource additions. This uncertainty in planning is evidenced by a decision the PUCN issued denying Nevada Power's proposed purchase of the South Point Energy Center, citing the unknown outcomes of the Energy Choice Initiative as one of the factors considered in their decision.early February 2021. Final regulations are pending.


41


Federal Regulation


The FERC is an independent agency with broad authority to implement provisions of the Federal Power Act, the Natural Gas Act ("NGA"), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ("Energy Policy Act") and other federal statutes. The FERC regulates rates for wholesale sales of electricity; transmission of electricity, including pricing and regional planning for the expansion of transmission systems; electric system reliability; utility holding companies; accounting and records retention; securities issuances; construction and operation of hydroelectric facilities; and other matters. The FERC also has the enforcement authority to assess civil penalties of up to $1.2$1.5 million per day per violation of rules, regulations and orders issued under the Federal Power Act. The Utilities have implemented programs and procedures that facilitate and monitor compliance with the FERC's regulations described below. MidAmerican Energy is also subject to regulation by the NRC pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended ("Atomic Energy Act"), with respect to its ownership interest in the Quad Cities Station.


Wholesale Electricity and Capacity


The FERC regulates the Utilities' rates charged to wholesale customers for electricityand transmission capacity and related services. Much of the Utilities' wholesale electricity sales and purchases occur under market-based pricing allowed by the FERC and are therefore subject to market volatility. As a result of a 2016 order from the FERC following BHE's acquisition of NV Energy, theThe Utilities are precluded from selling at market-based rates in the PacifiCorp-East, PacifiCorp-West, Nevada Utilities, Idaho Power Company and NorthWestern Energy balancing authority areas. The Utilities had previously relinquished their market-based rate authority in the NV Energy balancing authority area. Wholesale electricity sales in those specific balancing authority areas are permitted at cost-based rates. On October 30, 2017,PacifiCorp and the FERCNevada Utilities have been granted the application of PacifiCorp, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific for authority to bid into the California EIM at market-based rates.



The Utilities' authority to sell electricity in wholesale electricity markets at market-based rates is subject to triennial reviews conducted by the FERC. Accordingly, the Utilities are required to submit triennial filings to the FERC that demonstrate a lack of market power over sales of wholesale electricity and electric generation capacity in their respective market areas. PacifiCorp, the Nevada Utilities and certain affiliates, representing the BHE Northwest Companies, file together for market power study purposes. The BHE Northwest Companies' most recent triennial filing was made in June 20162022 and as to its non-mitigated balancing authority areas, was approved in November 2017.is under review by the FERC. MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Northeast Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Northeast Region was made in June 20172020 and an order accepting it was issued in January 2018.December 2020. MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Central Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Central Region was made in December 20172020 and is currently pending with the FERC.an order accepting it was issued in March 2022. Under the FERC's market-based rules, the Utilities must also file with the FERC a notice of change in status when there is a change in the conditions that the FERC relied upon in granting market-based rate authority. MidAmerican Energy most recently filed a notice of non-material change in status in July 2022, and the filing is currently under review by the FERC.


Transmission


PacifiCorp's and the Nevada Utilities' wholesale transmission services are regulated by the FERC under cost-based regulation subject to PacifiCorp's and the Nevada Utilities' OATT, respectively.OATTs. These services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis, which means that all potential customers are provided an equal opportunity to access the transmission system. PacifiCorp's and the Nevada Utilities' transmission business is managed and operated independently from its wholesale marketing business in accordance with the FERC's Standards of Conduct. PacifiCorp and the Nevada Utilities have made several required compliance filings in accordance with these rules.


In December 2011, PacifiCorp adopted a cost-based formula rate under its OATT for its transmission services. Cost-based formula rates are intended to be an effective means of recovering PacifiCorp's investments and associated costs of its transmission system without the need to file rate cases with the FERC, although the formula rate results are subject to discovery and challenges by the FERC and intervenors. A significant portion of these services are provided to PacifiCorp's energy supply management function.


MidAmerican Energy participates in the MISO as a transmission-owning member. Accordingly, the MISO is the transmission provider under its FERC-approved OATT. While the MISO is responsible for directing the operation of MidAmerican Energy's transmission system, MidAmerican Energy retains ownership of its transmission assets and, therefore, is subject to the FERC's reliability standards discussed below. MidAmerican Energy's transmission business is managed and operated independently from its wholesale marketing business in accordance with the FERCFERC's Standards of Conduct.


42


MidAmerican Energy has approval from the MISO to constructconstructed and ownowns four Multi-Value Projects ("MVPs") located in Iowa and Illinois that will have added approximately 250 miles of 345 kV345-kV transmission line to MidAmerican Energy's transmission system since 2012, of which 224 miles have been placed in-service as of December 31, 2017.2012. The MISOMISO's OATT allows for broad cost allocation for MidAmerican Energy's MVPs, including similar MVPs of other MISO participants. Accordingly, a significant portion of the revenue requirement associated with MidAmerican Energy's MVP investments will beis shared with other MISO participants based on the MISO's cost allocation methodology, and a portion of the revenue requirement of the other participants' MVPs will beis allocated to MidAmerican Energy. Additionally,Energy, which MidAmerican Energy has approvalrecovers from the FERC to include 100% of construction work in progress in the determination of rates for its MVPs and to usecustomers via a forward-looking rate structure for all of its transmission investments and costs.rider mechanism. The transmission assets and financial results of MidAmerican Energy's MVPs are excluded from the determination of its base retail electric rates.


The FERC has established an extensive number of mandatory reliability standards developed by the NERC and the WECC, including planning and operations, critical infrastructure protection and regional standards. Compliance, enforcement and monitoring oversight of these standards is carried out by the FERC; the NERC; and the WECC for PacifiCorp, Nevada Power, and Sierra Pacific; and the Midwest Reliability Organization for MidAmerican Energy.


Hydroelectric


The FERC licenses and regulates the operation of hydroelectric systems, including license compliance and dam safety programs. Most of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities are licensed by the FERC as major systems under the Federal Power Act, and certain of these systems are licensed under the Oregon Hydroelectric Act. Under the Federal Power Act, 17 dams associated with16 of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities licensed with the FERCdevelopments are classified as "high hazard potential," meaning it is probable in the event of a dam failure that loss of human life in the downstream population could occur. The FERC providesPacifiCorp uses the FERC's guidelines utilized by PacifiCorp in development ofto develop public safety programs consisting of a dam safety program and emergency action plans.



For an update regarding PacifiCorp's Klamath River hydroelectric system, is the only significant hydroelectric system for which PacifiCorp has a pending relicensing process with the FERC. Referrefer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 1314 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for an update regarding hydroelectric relicensing for PacifiCorp's Klamath River hydroelectric system.10-K.


Nuclear Regulatory Commission


General


MidAmerican Energy is subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC with respect to its license and 25% ownership interest in Quad Cities Station. Exelon Generation,Constellation Energy, the operator and 75% owner of Quad Cities Station, is under contract with MidAmerican Energy to secure and keep in effect all necessary NRC licenses and authorizations.


The NRC regulates the granting of permits and licenses for the construction and operation of nuclear generating stations and regularly inspects such stations for compliance with applicable laws, regulations and license terms. Current licenses for Quad Cities Station provide for operation until December 14, 2032. The NRC review and regulatory process covers, among other things, operations, maintenance, and environmental and radiological aspects of such stations. The NRC may modify, suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply with the Atomic Energy Act, the regulations under such Act or the terms of such licenses.


Federal regulations provide that any nuclear operating facility may be required to cease operation if the NRC determines there are deficiencies in state, local or utility emergency preparedness plans relating to such facility, and the deficiencies are not corrected. Exelon GenerationConstellation Energy has advised MidAmerican Energy that an emergency preparedness plan for Quad Cities Station has been approved by the NRC. Exelon GenerationConstellation Energy has also advised MidAmerican Energy that state and local plans relating to Quad Cities Station have been approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.


The NRC also regulates the decommissioning of nuclear-powered generating facilities, including the planning and funding for the eventual decommissioning of the facilities. In accordance with these regulations, MidAmerican Energy submits a biennial report to the NRC providing reasonable assurance that funds will be available to pay its share of the costs of decommissioning Quad Cities Station. MidAmerican Energy has established a trust for the investment of funds collected for nuclear decommissioning of Quad Cities Station.


43


Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 ("NWPA"), the U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE")DOE is responsible for the selection and development of repositories for, and the permanent disposal of, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive wastes. Exelon Generation,Constellation Energy, as required by the NWPA, signed a contract with the DOE under which the DOE was to receive spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste for disposal beginning not later than January 1998. The DOE did not begin receiving spent nuclear fuel on the scheduled date and remains unable to receive such fuel and waste. The costs to be incurred by the DOE for disposal activities were previously being financed by fees charged to owners and generators of the waste. In accordance with a 2013 ruling by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit, ("D.C. Circuit"), the DOE, in May 2014, provided notice that, effective May 16, 2014, the spent nuclear fuel disposal fee would be zero. In 2004, Exelon Generation,Constellation Energy, reached a settlement with the DOE concerning the DOE's failure to begin accepting spent nuclear fuel in 1998. As a result, Quad Cities Station has been billing the DOE, and the DOE is obligated to reimburse the station for all station costs incurred due to the DOE's delay. Exelon GenerationConstellation Energy has completed construction ofconstructed an interim spent fuel storage installation ("ISFSI") at Quad Cities Station consisting of two pads to store spent nuclear fuel in dry casks in order to free space in the storage pool. The first dry cask was placed in-service in 2005. As of December 31, 2021, the first pad at the ISFSI is full, and the second pad is in operation. The first and second pads at the ISFSI are expected to facilitate storage of casks to support operations at Quad Cities Station until at least 2020. The first storage in a dry cask commenced in November 2005. By 2020, Exelon Generation plans to add a second pad to the ISFSI to accommodate storage of spent nuclear fuel through the end of operations at Quad Cities Station.its operating licenses.
    
Nuclear Insurance


MidAmerican Energy maintains financial protection against catastrophic loss associated with its interest in Quad Cities Station through a combination of insurance purchased by Exelon Generation,Constellation Energy, insurance purchased directly by MidAmerican Energy, and the mandatory industry-wide loss funding mechanism afforded under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988 ("Price-Anderson"), which was amended and extended by the Energy Policy Act. The general types of coverage maintained are: nuclear liability, property damage or loss and nuclear worker liability, as discussed below.



Exelon GenerationConstellation Energy purchases private market nuclear liability insurance for Quad Cities Station in the maximum available amount of $450 million, which includes coverage for MidAmerican Energy's ownership. In accordance with Price-Anderson, excess liability protection above that amount is provided by a mandatory industry-wide Secondary Financial Protection program under which the licensees of nuclear generating facilities could be assessed for liability incurred due to a serious nuclear incident at any commercial nuclear reactor in the United States.U.S. Currently, MidAmerican Energy's aggregate maximum potential share of an assessment for Quad Cities Station is approximately $64$69 million per incident, payable in installments not to exceed $10 million annually.


The insurance for nuclear property damage losses covers property damage, stabilization and decontamination of the facility, disposal of the decontaminated material and premature decommissioning arising out of a covered loss. For Quad Cities Station, Exelon GenerationConstellation Energy purchases primary and excess property insurance protection for the combined interests in Quad Cities Station, with coverage limits for nuclear damage losses up to $1.5 billion for nuclear perils and $500 million for non-nuclear property damage losses up to $2.1 billion.perils. MidAmerican Energy also directly purchases extra expense coverage for its share of replacement power and other extra expenses in the event of a covered accidental outage at Quad Cities Station. The property and related coverages purchased directly by MidAmerican Energy and by Exelon Generation,Constellation Energy, which includes the interests of MidAmerican Energy, are underwritten by an industry mutual insurance company and contain provisions for retrospective premium assessments to be called upon based on the industry mutual board of directors' discretion for adverse loss experience. Currently, the maximum retrospective amounts that could be assessed against MidAmerican Energy from industry mutual policies for its obligations associated with Quad Cities Station total $9$8 million.


The master nuclear worker liability coverage, which is purchased by Exelon GenerationConstellation Energy for Quad Cities Station, is an industry-wide guaranteed-cost policy with an aggregate limit of $450 million for the nuclear industry as a whole, which is in effect to cover tort claims of workers in nuclear-related industries.


United StatesU.S. Mine Safety


PacifiCorp's surface mining operations are regulated by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, which administers federal mine safety and health laws and regulations, and state regulatory agencies. The Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration has the statutory authority to institute a civil action for relief, including a temporary or permanent injunction, restraining order or other appropriate order against a mine operator who fails to pay penalties or fines for violations of federal mine safety standards. Federal law requires PacifiCorp to have a written emergency response plan specific to each underground mine it operates, which is reviewed by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration every six months, and to have at least two mine rescue teams located within one hour of each mine. Information regarding PacifiCorp's mine safety violations and other legal matters disclosed in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K.


44


Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Subsidiaries


The Pipeline Companies are regulated by the FERC, pursuant to the NGA and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. Under this authority, the FERC regulates, among other items, (a) rates, charges, terms and conditions of service, and (b) the construction and operation of interstate pipelines, storage and related facilities, including the extension, expansion or abandonment of such facilities and (c) the construction and operation of LNG export/import facilities. The Pipeline Companies hold certificates of public convenience and necessity and LNG facility authorizations issued by the FERC, which authorize them to construct, operate and maintain their pipeline and related facilities and services.


In February 2022, the FERC updated its certificate policy that guides the authorization of natural gas projects and issued an interim policy providing guidance on how the FERC will review a natural gas project for its impact on climate change. The policies apply to pending and future natural gas projects. On March 24, 2022, the FERC revoked application of the policies and sought further comments.

FERC regulations and the Pipeline Companies' tariffs allow each of the Pipeline Companies to charge approved rates for the services set forth in their respective tariff.tariffs. Generally, these rates are a function of the cost of providing services to their customers, including prudently incurred operations and maintenance expenses, taxes, depreciation and amortization and a reasonable return on their investments. Both Northern Natural Gas' and Kern River's tariffinvested capital. Tariff rates for each of the Pipeline Companies have been developed under a rate design methodology whereby substantially all of their fixed costs, including a return on invested capital and income taxes, are collected through reservation charges, which are paid by firm transportation and storage customers regardless of volumes shipped. Commodity charges, which are paid only with respect to volumes actually shipped, are designed to recover the remaining, primarily variable, costs. Kern River's reservation rates have historically been approved using a "levelized" cost-of-service methodology so that the rate remains constant over the levelization period. This levelized cost of service has been achieved by using a FERC-approved depreciation schedule in which depreciation increases as interest expensethe cost of capital decreases on declining rate base. Each of the Pipeline Companies also hold authority to negotiate rates for their services, subject to requirements to offer cost-based rate alternatives, and return on equity amounts decrease. Both Northernto publish such negotiated rates.In addition, for services that are not subject to FERC rate jurisdiction pursuant to Section 3 of the Natural Gas' and Kern River'sGas Act, Cove Point charges rates that are established by contract.

The Pipeline Companies' rates are subject to change in future general rate proceedings. Rates for natural gas pipelines are changed by filings under either Section 5 or Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act. Section 5 proceedings are initiated by the FERC or the pipeline's customers for a potential reduction to rates that the FERC finds are no longer just and reasonable. In a Section 5 proceeding, the initiating party has the burden of demonstrating that the currently effective rates of the pipeline are no longer just and reasonable, and of demonstrating alternative just and reasonable rates. Any rate decrease as a result of a Section 5 proceeding is implemented prospectively upon the issuance of a final FERC order adopting the new just and reasonable rates. Section 4 rate proceedings are initiated by the natural gas pipeline, who must demonstrate that the new proposed rates are just and reasonable. The new rates as a result of a Section 4 proceeding are typically implemented six months after the Section 4 filing if higher than prior rates and are subject to refund upon issuance of a final order by the FERC.


NaturalThe FERC-regulated natural gas transportation companies may not grant any undue preference to any customer. FERC regulations require that certain information be made public for market access, through standardized internet websites.These regulations also restrict each pipeline's marketing affiliates' access to certain non-public information regarding their affiliated interstate natural gas transmission pipelines.that could affect price or availability of service.



Interstate natural gas pipelines are also subject to regulations administered by the Office of Pipeline Safety within the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, an agency withinof the United States Department of Transportation ("DOT").DOT. Federal pipeline safety regulations are issued pursuant to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended ("NGPSA"), which establishes safety requirements in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of interstate natural gas facilities, and requires an entity that owns or operates pipeline facilities to comply with such plans. Major amendments to the NGPSA include the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 ("2002 Act"), the Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement and Safety Act of 2006 ("2006 Act"), the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 ("2011 Act") the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 ("2016 Act") and the Protecting Our Infrastructure Ofof Pipelines Andand Enhancing Safety Act Of 2016of 2020 ("20162020 Act").


45


The 2002 Act established additional safety and pipeline integrity regulations for all natural gas pipelines in high-consequence areas. The 2002 Act imposed major new requirements in the areas of operator qualifications, risk analysis and integrity management. The 2002 Act mandated more frequent periodic inspection or testing of natural gas pipelines in high-consequence areas, which are locations where the potential consequences of a natural gas pipeline accident may be significant or may do considerable harm to persons or property. Pursuant to the 2002 Act, the DOT promulgated new regulations that require natural gas pipeline operators to develop comprehensive integrity management programs, to identify applicable threats to natural gas pipeline segments that could impact high-consequence areas, to assess these segments and to provide ongoing mitigation and monitoring. The regulations require recurring inspections of high consequencehigh-consequence area segments every seven years after the initial baseline assessment which was completed by Kern River in early 2011 and Northern Natural Gas in 2012.assessment.


The 2006 Act required pipeline operators to institute human factors management plans for personnel employed in pipeline control centers. DOT regulations published pursuant to the 2006 Act required development and implementation of written control room management procedures.


The 2011 Act was a response to natural gas pipeline incidents, most notably the San Bruno natural gas pipeline explosion that occurred in September 2010 in California. The 2011 Act increased the maximum allowable civil penalties for violations, directs operator assistance for Federal authorities conducting investigations and authorized the DOT to hire additional inspection and enforcement personnel. The 2011 Act also directed the DOT to study several topics, including the definition of high-consequence areas, the use of automatic shutoff valves in high-consequence areas, expansion of integrity management requirements beyond high-consequence areas and cast iron pipe replacement. The studies are complete, and a number of notices of proposed rulemaking have been issued. The BHE Pipeline Group anticipatesand Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ("PHMSA") issued the Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines: MAOP Reconfirmation, Expansion of Assessment Requirements and Other Related Amendments final rules on a numberrule in October 2019. The primary change was the expansion of the pipeline integrity assessment requirements to cover moderate-consequence areas sometime in 2018.and reconfirming maximum allowable operating pressures. Pipeline operators were required to develop procedures to address assessment requirements by July 2021 and complete 50% of the required MAOP reconfirmation actions by 2028 and the remaining by 2035. The BHE Pipeline Group cannot currently assesshas updated procedures, identified pipeline segments subject to the potential costrule and has planned projects to complete required assessments. PHMSA sent Part 2 of compliance with new rulesthe rule to the Federal Register for publishing August 4, 2022, and regulations underit was published in the 2011 Act.Federal Register August 24, 2022. The rule initially had an effective date of May 2023, but has been extended to February 2024. The third part of the rule, the gas gathering rule, has also been issued, but has minimal impact on the BHE Pipeline Group.


The 2016 Actrequired the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to set federal minimum safety standards for underground natural gas storage facilities and authorized emergency order (interim final rule) authority. TheIn February 2020, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration issued an interima final rule requiringregarding underground natural gas storage field operators to implement the requirements offacilities that incorporates by reference the American Petroleum Institute ("API")Institute's Recommended Practice 1171, "Functional Integrity of Natural Gas Storage in Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs and Aquifer Reservoirs.Reservoirs," Northern Natural Gasclarifies certain aspects of the mandatory nature of the standard and defines regulatory completion dates for underground storage facility risk assessments. The BHE Pipeline Group has three20 total underground natural gas storage fields whichat EGTS and Northern Natural Gas that fall under this regulation and has implemented programs to be in full complianceis complying with this regulation.the final rule. The BHE Pipeline Group underground storage fields have had several audits under the Final Rule with no notices of probable violations issued. Kern River, doesCarolina Gas and Cove Point do not have underground natural gas storage facilities.


The 2020 Act required operations to review and update their inspection and maintenance plans to address how the plans contribute to eliminate hazardous leaks of natural gas, reduction of fugitive emissions and replacement or remediation of pipelines that are known to leak based on the material, design or past operating maintenance history. BHE Pipeline Group has completed the review and update of its inspection and maintenance plans. To assist in this effort, Kern River participated in a non-punitive pilot inspection with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

The DOT and related state agencies routinely audit and inspect the pipeline facilities for compliance with their regulations. The Pipeline Companies conduct periodic internal audits of their facilities every four years with more frequent reviews of those deemed higher risk. The Pipeline Companies also conduct preliminary audits in advance of agency audits. Compliance issues that arise during these audits or during the normal course of business are addressed on a timely basis. The Pipeline Companies believe their pipeline systems comply in all material respects with the NGPSA and with DOT regulations issued pursuant to the NGPSA.


46


Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies


The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, as holders of electricity distribution licenses, are subject to regulation by GEMA. GEMA regulates distribution network operators ("DNOs") within the terms of the Electricity Act 1989 and the terms of DNO licenses, which are revocable with 25 years notice. Under the Electricity Act 1989, GEMA has a duty to ensure that DNOs can finance their regulated activities and DNOs have a duty to maintain an investment grade credit rating. GEMA discharges certain of its duties through its staff within Ofgem. Each of fourteen licensed DNOs distributes electricity from the national grid transmission system and distribution-connected generators to end users within its respective distribution services area.



DNOs are subject to price controls, enforced by Ofgem, that limit the revenue that may be recovered and retained from their electricity distribution activities. The regulatory regime that has been applied to electricity distributors in Great Britain encourages companies to look for efficiency gains in order to improve profits. The distribution price control formula also adjusts the revenue received by DNOs to reflect a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the rate of inflation (as measured by the United Kingdom's Retail Prices Index) and the quality of service delivered by the licensee's distribution system. The currentnext price control, Electricity Distribution 12 ("ED1"ED2"), has beenwill be set for a period of eightfive years, starting April 1, 2015,2023, although the formula has been, and may be, reviewed by the regulator following public consultation. The procedure and methodology adopted at a price control review are at the reasonable discretion of Ofgem. Ofgem's judgment of the future allowed revenue of licensees is likely to take into account, among other things:
the actual operating and capital costs of each of the licensees;
the operating and capital costs that each of the licensees would incur if it were as efficient as, in Ofgem's judgment, the more efficient licensees;
the actual value of certain costs which are judged to be beyond the control of the licensees;
the taxes that each licensee is expected to pay;
the regulatory value ascribed to the expenditures that have been incurred in the past and the efficient expenditures that are to be incurred in the forthcoming regulatory period;
the rate of return to be allowed on expenditures that make up the regulatory asset value;
the financial ratios of each of the licensees and the license requirement for each licensee to maintain investment grade status;
an allowance in respect of the repair of the pension deficits in the defined benefit pension schemes sponsored by each of the licensees; and
any under- or over-recoveries of revenues, relative to allowed revenues, in the previous price control period.


A number of incentive schemes also operate within the current price control period to encourage DNOs to provide an appropriate quality of service to end users. This includes specified payments to be made for failures to meet prescribed standards of service. The aggregate of these guaranteed standards payments is uncapped but may be excused in certain prescribed circumstances that are generally beyond the control of the DNOs.


AThe current electricity distribution price control became effective April 1, 2015 and is due to terminate on March 31, 2023, and will be immediately replaced with a new price control. Although it has been the convention in Great Britain for regulators to conduct periodic regulatory reviews before making proposals for any changes to the price controls, a new price control can be implemented by GEMA without the consent of the DNOs, but ifDNOs. If a licensee disagrees with a change to its license, it can appeal the matter to the United Kingdom's CMA, as can certain other parties. Any appeals must be notified within 20 working days of the license modification by GEMA. If the CMA determines that the appellant has relevant standing, then the statute requires that the CMA complete its process within six months, or in some exceptional circumstances seven months. The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies appealed Ofgem's proposals for the resetting of the formula that commenced April 1, 2015, as did one other party, and the CMA subsequently revised GEMA's decision.


The current electricity distribution price control became effective April 1, 2015 and is due to terminate on March 31, 2023, and will be immediately replaced with a new price control (in line with GEMA's current timetable). This price control iswas the first to be set for electricity distribution in Great Britain since Ofgem completed its review of network regulation (known as the RPI-X @ 20 project). The key changes to the price control calculations, compared to those used in previous price controls are that:
the period over which new regulatory assets are depreciated is being gradually lengthened, from 20 years to 45 years, with the change being phased over eight years;
47


allowed revenues will be adjusted during the price control period, rather than at the next price control review, to partially reflect cost variances relative to cost allowances;
the allowed cost of debt will be updated within the price control period by reference to a long-run trailing average based on external benchmarks of utility debt costs;
allowed revenues will be adjusted in relation to some new service standard incentives, principally relating to speed and service standards for new connections to the network; and
there iswas scope for a mid-period review and adjustment to revenues in the latter half of the period for any changes in the outputs required of licensees for certain specified reasons.reasons, although GEMA made no adjustments under this provision.



Under the current price control, as revised by the CMA, and excluding the effects of incentive schemes and any deferred revenues from the prior price control, the opening base allowed revenue of Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limitedplc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc decreased by approximately 1.0% and 0.5%, respectively, from 2015-16 to 2016-17, and then remains constant in all subsequent years within the price control period (RIIO-ED1)(ED1) through 2022-23, before the addition of inflation. Nominal opening base allowed revenues will increase in line with inflation. Adjustments are made annually to recognize the effect of factors such as changes in the allowed cost of debt, performance on incentive schemes and catch up of prior year under- or over- recoveries.


Ofgem has completed the price control review that will result in a new price control effective April 1, 2023. The license modifications that give effect to the price control were published by Ofgem on February 3, 2023 and may be subject to appeal to the CMA if an appeal is filed by March 3, 2023. Many aspects of the current price control were maintained and the changes made generally follow the template that was set by the price controls implemented in April 2021 for transmission and gas distribution in Great Britain. Specific changes include new service standard incentives and mechanisms to adjust cost allowances in specific circumstances, particularly related to investment required to support decarbonization efforts, and partially updating the allowed return on equity within the period for changes in the interest rate on government bonds. Ofgem's final determinations also included an allowed cost of equity of 5.23% plus inflation (calculated using the United Kingdom's consumer prices index including owner occupiers' housing costs) and cost allowances representing a 20% real-term increase compared to the current regulatory period annual average. The base allowed revenue, excluding the effects of incentive schemes, pass-through costs and any deferred revenues from the prior price control, will decrease approximately 4.0% at Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and will increase approximately 2.5% at Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc, respectively, in 2023-24 before the addition of inflation.

Ofgem also monitors DNO compliance with license conditions and enforces the remedies resulting from any breach of condition. License conditions include the prices and terms of service, financial strength of the DNO, the provision of information to Ofgem and the public, as well as maintaining transparency, non-discrimination and avoidance of cross-subsidy in the provision of such services. Ofgem also monitors and enforces certain duties of a DNO set out in the Electricity Act 1989, including the duty to develop and maintain an efficient, coordinated and economical system of electricity distribution. Under changes to the Electricity Act 1989 introduced by the Utilities Act 2000, GEMA is able to impose financial penalties on DNOs that contravene any of their license duties or certain of their duties under the Electricity Act 1989, as amended, or that are failing to achieve a satisfactory performance in relation to the individual standards prescribed by GEMA. Any penalty imposed must be reasonable and may not exceed 10% of the licensee's revenue.


ALP TransmissionAltaLink


ALPAltaLink is regulated by the AUC, pursuant to the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), the Public Utilities Act (Alberta), the Alberta Utilities Commission Act (Alberta) and the Hydro and Electric Energy Act (Alberta). The AUC is an independent, quasi-judicial agency established by the province of Alberta, Canada, which is responsible for, among other things, approving the tariffs of transmission facility owners, including ALP,AltaLink, and distribution utilities, acquisitions of such transmission facility owners or utilities, and construction and operation of new transmission projects in Alberta. The AUC also investigates and rules on regulated rate disputes and system access problems. The AUC regulates and oversees Alberta's electricity transmission sector with broad authority that may impact many of ALP'sAltaLink's activities, including its tariffs, rates, construction, operations and financing.


48


The AUC has various core functions in regulating the Alberta electricity transmission sector, including the following:
regulating and adjudicating issues related to the operation of electric utilities within Alberta;
processing and approving general tariff applications relating to revenue requirements, capital expenditure prudency and rates of return including deemed capital structure for regulated utilities while ensuring that utility rates are just and reasonable, and approval of the transmission tariff rates of regulated transmission providers paid by the AESO, which is the independent transmission system operator in Alberta, Canada that controls the operation of ALP'sAltaLink's transmission system;
approving the need for new electricity transmission facilities and permits to build and licenses to operate electricity transmission facilities;
reviewing operations and accounts from electric utilities and conducting on-site inspections to ensure compliance with industry regulation and standards;
adjudicating enforcement issues including the imposition of administrative penalties that arise when market participants violate the rules of the AESO; and
collecting, storing, analyzing, appraising and disseminating information to effectively fulfill its duties as an industry regulator.


ALP'sIn addition, AUC approval is required in connection with new energy and regulated utility initiatives in Alberta, amendments to existing approvals and financing proposals by designated utilities.

AltaLink's tariffs are regulated by the AUC under the provisions of the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) in respect of rates and terms and conditions of service. The Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) and related regulations require the AUC to consider that it is in the public interest to provide consumers the benefit of unconstrained transmission access to competitive generation and the wholesale electricity market. In regulating transmission tariffs, the AUC must facilitate sufficient investment to ensure the timely upgrade, enhancement or expansion of transmission facilities, and foster a stable investment climate and a continued stream of capital investment for the transmission system.


Under the Electric Utilities Act ALP(Alberta), AltaLink prepares and files applications with the AUC for approval of tariffs to be paid by the AESO for the use of its transmission facilities, and the terms and conditions governing the use of those facilities. The AUC reviews and approves such tariff applications based on a cost-of-service regulatory model under a forward test year basis. Under this model, the AUC provides ALPAltaLink with a reasonable opportunity to (i) earn a fair return on equity; and (ii) recover its forecast costs, including operating expenses, depreciation, borrowing costs and taxes (including deemed income taxes) associated with its regulated transmission business. The AUC must approve tariffs that are just, reasonable and not unduly preferential, arbitrary or unjustly discriminatory. ALP'sAltaLink's transmission tariffs are not dependent on the price or volume of electricity transported through its transmission system.



The AESO is an independent system operator in Alberta, Canada that oversees the AIESAlberta Interconnected Electric System ("AIES") and wholesale electricity market. The AESO is responsible for directing the safe, reliable and economic operation of the AIES, including long-term transmission system planning. ALPAltaLink and the other transmission facility owners receive substantially all of their transmission tariff revenues from the AESO. The AESO, in turn, charges wholesale tariffs, approved by the AUC, in a manner that promotes fair and open access to the AIES and facilitates a competitive market for the purchase and sale of electricity. The AESO monitors compliance with approved reliability standards, which are enforced by the Market Surveillance Administrator, which may impose penalties on transmission facility owners for non-compliance with the approved reliability standards.


The AESO determines the need and plans for the expansion and enhancement of a congestion freethe transmission system in Alberta in accordance with applicable law and reliability standards. The AESO's responsibilities include long-term transmission planning and management, including assessing and planning for the current and future transmission system capacity needs of the AESO market participants. When the AESO determines an expansion or enhancement of the transmission system is needed, with limited exceptions, it submits an application to the AUC for approval of the proposed expansion or enhancement. The AESO then determines which transmission provider should submit an application to the AUC for a permit and license to construct and operate the designated transmission facilities. Generally, the transmission provider operating in the geographic area where the transmission facilities expansion or enhancement is to be located is selected by the AESO to build, own and operate the transmission facilities. In addition, Alberta law provides that certain transmission projects may be subject to a competitive process open to qualified bidders.


49


Independent Power ProjectsMidAmerican Energy


MidAmerican Energy, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is a U.S. regulated electric and natural gas utility company headquartered in Iowa that serves 0.8 million retail electric customers in portions of Iowa, Illinois and South Dakota and 0.8 million retail and transportation natural gas customers in portions of Iowa, South Dakota, Illinois and Nebraska. MidAmerican Energy is principally engaged in the business of generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electricity and in distributing, selling and transporting natural gas. MidAmerican Energy's service territory covers approximately 11,000 square miles. MidAmerican Energy has a diverse customer base consisting of urban and rural residential customers and a variety of commercial and industrial customers. Principal industries served by MidAmerican Energy include electronic data storage; processing and sales of food products; manufacturing, processing and fabrication of primary metals, farm and other non-electrical machinery; cement and gypsum products; and government. In addition to retail sales and natural gas transportation, MidAmerican Energy sells electricity principally to markets operated by RTOs and natural gas to other utilities and market participants on a wholesale basis. MidAmerican Energy is a transmission-owning member of the MISO and participates in its capacity, energy and ancillary services markets.

MidAmerican Energy's regulated electric and natural gas operations are conducted under numerous franchise agreements, certificates, permits and licenses obtained from federal, state and local authorities. The franchise agreements, with various expiration dates, are typically for 20- to 25-year terms. Several of these franchise agreements give either party the right to seek amendment to the franchise agreement at one or two specified times during the term. MidAmerican Energy generally has an exclusive right to serve electric customers within its service territories and, in turn, has an obligation to provide electricity service to those customers. In return, the state utility commissions have established rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow MidAmerican Energy an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its investment. In Illinois, MidAmerican Energy's regulated retail electric customers may choose their energy supplier.

MidAmerican Energy's operating revenue and operating income derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 were as follows (dollars in millions):

202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$2,988 74 %$2,529 71 %$2,139 79 %
Regulated gas1,030 26 1,003 28 573 21 
Other— 15 — 
Total operating revenue$4,025 100 %$3,547 100 %$2,720 100 %
Operating income:
Regulated electric$372 85 %$358 86 %$384 86 %
Regulated gas66 15 58 14 64 14 
Total operating income$438 100 %$416 100 %$448 100 %

MidAmerican Energy was incorporated under the laws of the state of Iowa in 1995 and its principal executive offices are located at 666 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580, its telephone number is (515) 242-4300 and its internet address is www.midamericanenergy.com.

11


Regulated Electric Operations

Customers

The Yuma, Cordova, Saranac,GWhs and percentages of electricity sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail customers by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Iowa27,024 92 %25,909 92 %24,425 92 %
Illinois1,970 1,895 1,847 
South Dakota296 270 251 
29,290 100 %28,074 100 %26,523 100 %

Electricity sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
GWhs sold:
Residential7,006 15 %6,718 15 %6,687 18 %
Commercial4,017 3,841 3,707 10 
Industrial16,646 35 15,944 36 14,645 39 
Other1,621 1,571 1,484 
Total retail29,290 62 28,074 64 26,523 71 
Wholesale17,964 38 16,011 36 11,219 29 
Total GWhs sold47,254 100 %44,085 100 %37,742 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential697 86 %690 86 %682 86 %
Commercial99 12 98 12 97 12 
Industrial— — — 
Other15 14 14 
Total813 100 %804 100 %795 100 %

Variations in weather, economic conditions and various conservation and energy efficiency measures and programs can impact customer energy requirements. Wholesale sales are primarily impacted by market prices for energy.

There are seasonal variations in MidAmerican Energy's electricity sales that are principally related to weather and the related use of electricity for air conditioning. Additionally, electricity sales are priced higher in the summer months compared to the remaining months of the year. As a result, 40% to 50% of MidAmerican Energy's regulated electric retail revenue is reported in the months of June, July, August and September.

A degree of concentration of sales exists with certain large electric retail customers. Sales to the 10 largest customers, from a variety of industries, comprised 25%, 24% and 23% of total retail electric sales in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sales to electronic data storage customers included in the 10 largest customers comprised 18%, 16% and 16% of total retail electric sales in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The annual hourly peak demand on MidAmerican Energy's electric system usually occurs as a result of air conditioning use during the cooling season. Peak demand represents the highest demand on a given day and at a given hour. On August 2, 2022, retail customer usage of electricity caused a new record hourly peak demand of 5,386 MWs on MidAmerican Energy's electric distribution system, which is 150 MWs greater than the previous record hourly peak demand of 5,236 MWs set June 17, 2021.

12


Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply

MidAmerican Energy has ownership interest in a diverse portfolio of generating facilities. The following table presents certain information regarding MidAmerican Energy's owned generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:
FacilityNet
Year Installed /Net CapacityOwned Capacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy Source
Repowered(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
WIND:
Ida GroveIda Grove, IAWind2016-2019500 500 
OrientGreenfield, IAWind2018-2019500 500 
HighlandPrimghar, IAWind2015475 475 
Rolling HillsMassena, IAWind2011 / 2022443 443 
Beaver CreekOgden, IAWind2017-2018340 340 
North EnglishMontezuma, IAWind2018-2019340 340 
Palo AltoPalo Alto, IAWind2019-2020340 340 
Arbor HillGreenfield, IAWind2018-2020316 316 
PomeroyPomeroy, IAWind2007-2011 / 2018-2019, 2021286 286 
Diamond TrailLadora, IAWind2020250 250 
LundgrenOtho, IAWind2014250 250 
O'BrienPrimghar, IAWind2016250 250 
Southern HillsOrient, IAWind2020-2021250 250 
CenturyBlairsburg, IAWind2005-2008 / 2017-2018200 200 
EclipseAdair, IAWind2012 / 2022200 200 
PlymouthRemsen, IAWind2021200 200 
IntrepidSchaller, IAWind2004-2005 / 2017176 176 
AdairAdair, IAWind2008 / 2019-2020175 175 
PrairieMontezuma, IAWind2017-2018169 169 
CarrollCarroll, IAWind2008 / 2019150 150 
WalnutWalnut, IAWind2008 / 2019150 150 
ViennaGladbrook, IAWind2012-2013150 150 
AdamsLennox, IAWind2015150 150 
WellsburgWellsburg, IAWind2014139 139 
LaurelLaurel, IAWind2011 / 2022120 120 
MacksburgMacksburg, IAWind2014119 119 
ContrailBraddyville, IAWind2020110 110 
Morning LightAdair, IAWind2012 / 2022100 100 
VictoryWestside, IAWind2006 / 2017-201899 99 
IvesterWellsburg, IAWind201890 90 
Pocahontas PrairiePomeroy, IAWind2020 / 202180 80 
Charles CityCharles City, IAWind2008 / 201875 75 
7,192 7,192 
COAL:
LouisaMuscatine, IACoal1983747 657 
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 3Council Bluffs, IACoal1978702 555 
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 4Council Bluffs, IACoal2007806 481 
OttumwaOttumwa, IACoal1981706 367 
George Neal Unit No. 3Sergeant Bluff, IACoal1975504 363 
George Neal Unit No. 4Salix, IACoal1979640 260 
4,105 2,683 
NATURAL GAS AND OTHER:
Greater Des MoinesPleasant Hill, IAGas2003-2004511 511 
ElectrifarmWaterloo, IAGas or Oil1975-1978178 178 
Pleasant HillPleasant Hill, IAGas or Oil1990-1994155 155 
SycamoreJohnston, IAGas or Oil1974149 149 
13


FacilityNet
Year Installed /Net CapacityOwned Capacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy Source
Repowered(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
River HillsDes Moines, IAGas1966-1967118 118 
CoralvilleCoralville, IAGas197062 62 
MolineMoline, ILGas197060 60 
27 portable power modulesVariousOil200054 54 
ParrCharles City, IAGas196933 33 
1,320 1,320 
NUCLEAR:
Quad Cities Unit Nos. 1 and 2Cordova, ILUranium19721,822 455 
SOLAR:
Holliday CreekFort Dodge, IASolar2022100 100 
Arbor HillAdair, IASolar202224 24 
FranklinHampton, IASolar2022
NealSalix, IASolar2022
WaterlooWaterloo, IASolar2022
HillsHills, IASolar2022
141 141 
HYDROELECTRIC:
Moline Unit Nos. 1-4Moline, ILHydroelectric1941
Total Available Generating Capacity14,584 11,795 
(1)Repowered dates are associated with component replacements on existing wind-powered generating facilities commonly referred to by the IRS as repowering. IRS rules provide for re-establishment of the PTCs for an existing wind-powered generating facility upon the replacement of a significant portion of its components. If the degree of component replacement in such projects meets IRS guidelines, PTCs are re-established for 10 years at rates that depend upon the date on which construction begins.
(2)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates MidAmerican Energy's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
The following table shows the percentages of MidAmerican Energy's total energy supplied by energy source for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Wind and other renewable(1)
58 %52 %54 %
Coal21 27 19 
Nuclear10 
Natural gas
Total energy generated90 91 85 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other14 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
100 %100 %100 %
(1)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.

14


MidAmerican Energy is required to have accredited resources available for dispatch by MISO to continuously meet its customer's needs and reliably operate its electric system. The percentage of MidAmerican Energy's energy supplied by energy source varies from year to year and is subject to numerous operational and economic factors such as planned and unplanned outages, fuel commodity prices, fuel transportation costs, weather, environmental considerations, transmission constraints, and wholesale market prices of electricity. MidAmerican Energy evaluates these factors continuously in order to facilitate economic dispatch of its generating facilities by MISO. When factors for one energy source are less favorable, MidAmerican Energy places more reliance on other energy sources. For example, MidAmerican Energy can generate more electricity using its low cost wind-powered generating facilities when factors associated with these facilities are favorable. When factors associated with wind resources are less favorable, MidAmerican Energy must increase its reliance on more expensive generation or purchased electricity. Refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of energy cost recovery by jurisdiction.

Wind

MidAmerican Energy owns more wind-powered generating capacity than any other U.S. rate-regulated electric utility and believes wind-powered generation offers a viable, economical and environmentally prudent means of supplying electricity and complying with laws and regulations. Pursuant to ratemaking principles approved by the IUB, facilities accounting for 92% of MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating capacity in-service at December 31, 2022, are authorized to earn over their regulatory lives a fixed rate of return on equity ranging from 11.0% to 12.2% on the depreciated cost of their original construction, which excludes the cost of later replacements, in any future Iowa rate proceeding. MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities, including those facilities where a significant portion of the equipment was replaced, commonly referred to as repowered facilities, are eligible for federal renewable electricity PTCs for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service. PTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-powered generating facilities is produced and sold. PTCs for MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities currently in-service began expiring in 2014, with final expiration in 2032. Since 2014, MidAmerican Energy has repowered, or plans to repower, 2,204 MWs of wind-powered generating facilities for which PTCs had expired by the end of 2022.

Of the 7,414 MWs (nameplate capacity) of wind-powered generating facilities in-service as of December 31, 2022, 7,249 MWs were generating PTCs, including 2,310 MWs of repowered facilities. PTCs earned by MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service prior to 2013, except for repowered facilities, were included in MidAmerican Energy's Iowa EAC, through which MidAmerican Energy is allowed to recover fluctuations in its electric retail energy costs. All of the eligibility of those facilities to earn PTCs had expired by the end of 2022. MidAmerican Energy earned PTCs totaling $710 million, $574 million and $510 million in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of which 4%, 12% and 15%, respectively, were included in the Iowa EAC.

Coal

All of the coal-fueled generating facilities operated by MidAmerican Energy are fueled by low-sulfur, western coal from the Powder River Basin in northeast Wyoming. MidAmerican Energy's coal supply portfolio includes multiple suppliers and mines under short-term and multi-year agreements of varying terms and quantities through 2027. MidAmerican Energy believes supplies from these sources are presently adequate and available to meet MidAmerican Energy's needs. MidAmerican Energy's coal supply portfolio has substantially all of its expected 2023 and a majority of 2024 requirements under fixed-price contracts. MidAmerican Energy regularly monitors the western coal market for opportunities to enhance its coal supply portfolio.

MidAmerican Energy has a multi-year long-haul coal transportation agreement with BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF"), an affiliate company, for the delivery of coal to all of the MidAmerican Energy-operated coal-fueled generating facilities other than the George Neal Energy Center. Under this agreement, BNSF delivers coal directly to MidAmerican Energy's Walter Scott, Jr. Energy Center and to an interchange point with Canadian Pacific Railway Company for short-haul delivery to the Louisa Energy Center. MidAmerican Energy has a multi-year long-haul coal transportation agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company for the delivery of coal to the George Neal Energy Center.

15


Nuclear

MidAmerican Energy is a 25% joint owner of Quad Cities Generating Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station"), a nuclear generating facility, which is currently licensed by the NRC for operation until December 14, 2032. Constellation Energy Generation, LLC ("Constellation Energy"), is the 75% joint owner and the operator of Quad Cities Station. Approximately one-third of the nuclear fuel assemblies in each reactor core at Quad Cities Station is replaced every 24 months. MidAmerican Energy has been advised by Constellation Energy that it does not anticipate it will have difficulty in obtaining the necessary uranium concentrates or conversion, enrichment or fabrication services to meet the nuclear fuel requirements of Quad Cities Station. In reaction to concerns about the profitability of Quad Cities Station and Constellation Energy's ability to continue its operation, in December 2016, Illinois passed legislation creating a zero emission standard, which went into effect June 1, 2017. The zero emission standard requires the Illinois Power Resources, Topaz, Agua Caliente, Solar Star, Bishop Hill II, JumboAgency to purchase ZECs and recover the costs from certain ratepayers in Illinois, subject to certain limitations. Currently, Quad Cities is operating under agreements to provide Illinois load serving entities ZECs through June 1, 2027.
Natural Gas and Other

MidAmerican Energy uses natural gas and oil as fuel for intermediate and peak demand electric generation, igniter fuel, transmission support and standby purposes. These sources are presently in adequate supply and available to meet MidAmerican Energy's needs.

Regional Transmission Organizations

MidAmerican Energy sells and purchases electricity and ancillary services related to its generation and load in wholesale markets pursuant to the tariffs in those markets. MidAmerican Energy participates predominantly in the MISO energy and ancillary service markets, which provide MidAmerican Energy with wholesale opportunities over a large market area. MidAmerican Energy can enter into wholesale bilateral transactions in addition to market activity related to its assets. MidAmerican Energy is also authorized to participate in the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. markets and can contract with several other utilities in the region. MidAmerican Energy utilizes financial swaps and physical fixed-price electricity sales and purchases contracts to reduce its exposure to electricity price volatility.

MidAmerican Energy's decisions regarding additions to or reductions of its generation portfolio may be impacted by the MISO's minimum reserve margin requirement. The MISO requires each member to maintain a minimum reserve margin of its accredited generating capacity over its peak demand obligation based on the member's load forecast filed with the MISO each year. The MISO's reserve requirement was 8.7% for the summer of 2022. MidAmerican Energy's owned and contracted capacity accredited for the 2022-2023 MISO capacity auction was 5,591 MWs compared to a peak demand obligation of 5,078 MWs, or a reserve margin of 10.1%. Beginning with the 2023-2024 planning year, the MISO will implement a seasonal construct requiring each member to maintain a minimum seasonal reserve margin of its accredited generating capacity over its seasonal peak demand obligation based on the member's seasonal load forecast filed with the MISO each year. The reserve requirements for the 2023-2024 planning year will be 7.4% for summer 2023, 14.9% for fall 2023, 25.5% for winter 2023-2024 and 24.5% for spring 2024. Accredited capacity represents the amount of generation available to meet the requirements of MidAmerican Energy's retail customers and consists of MidAmerican Energy-owned generation, interruptible retail customer load, certain customer private generation that MidAmerican Energy is contractually allowed to dispatch and the net amount of capacity purchases and sales, excluding sales into the MISO annual capacity auction. Accredited capacity may vary significantly from the nominal capacity ratings, particularly for wind or solar facilities whose output is dependent upon energy resource availability at any given time. Additionally, the actual amount of generating capacity available at any time may be less than the accredited capacity due to regulatory restrictions, transmission constraints, fuel restrictions and generating units being temporarily out of service for inspection, maintenance, refueling, modifications or other reasons.

16


Transmission and Distribution

MidAmerican Energy's transmission and distribution systems included 4,600 circuit miles of transmission lines in four states, 25,400 circuit miles of distribution lines and 345 substations as of December 31, 2022. Electricity from MidAmerican Energy's generating facilities and purchased electricity is delivered to wholesale markets and its retail customers via the transmission facilities of MidAmerican Energy and others. MidAmerican Energy participates in the MISO capacity, energy and ancillary services markets as a transmission-owning member and, accordingly, operates its transmission assets at the direction of the MISO. The MISO manages its energy and ancillary service markets using reliability-constrained economic dispatch of the region's generation. For both the day-ahead and real-time (every five minutes) markets, the MISO analyzes generation commitments to provide market liquidity and transparent pricing while maintaining transmission system reliability by minimizing congestion and maximizing efficient energy transmission. Additionally, through its FERC-approved OATT, the MISO performs the role of transmission service provider throughout the MISO footprint and administers the long-term planning function. The MISO costs of the participants are shared among the participants through a number of mechanisms in accordance with the MISO tariff.

Regulated Natural Gas Operations

MidAmerican Energy is engaged in the distribution of natural gas to customers in its service territory and the related procurement, transportation and storage of natural gas for the benefit of those customers. MidAmerican Energy purchases natural gas from various suppliers and contracts with interstate natural gas pipelines for transportation of the gas to MidAmerican Energy's service territory and for storage and balancing services. MidAmerican Energy sells natural gas and delivery services to end-use customers on its distribution system; sells natural gas to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies; and transports natural gas through its distribution system for end-use customers who have independently secured their supply of natural gas. During 2022, 54% of the total natural gas delivered through MidAmerican Energy's distribution system was associated with transportation service.

Natural gas property consists primarily of natural gas mains and service lines, meters, and related distribution equipment, including feeder lines to communities served from natural gas pipelines owned by others. The natural gas distribution facilities of MidAmerican Energy included 24,600 miles of natural gas main and service lines as of December 31, 2022.

Customer Usage and Seasonality

The percentages of natural gas sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail customers by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Iowa76 %76 %76 %
South Dakota14 13 13 
Illinois10 10 
Nebraska
100 %100 %100 %

17


The percentages of natural gas sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer, total Dths of natural gas sold, total Dths of transportation service and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Residential47 %44 %45 %
Commercial(1)
22 20 20 
Industrial(1)
Total retail74 69 70 
Wholesale(2)
26 31 30 
100 %100 %100 %
Total Dths of natural gas sold (in thousands)119,508111,916114,399
Total Dths of transportation service (in thousands)102,827112,631110,263
Total average number of retail customers (in thousands)789781774
(1)Commercial and industrial customers are classified primarily based on the nature of their business and natural gas usage. Commercial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas principally for heating. Industrial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas principally for their manufacturing processes.
(2)Wholesale sales are generally made to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies for eventual resale to end-use customers.

There are seasonal variations in MidAmerican Energy's regulated natural gas business that are principally due to the use of natural gas for heating. Typically, 50-60% of MidAmerican Energy's regulated retail natural gas revenue is reported in the months of January, February, March and December.

On January 29, 2019, MidAmerican Energy recorded its all-time highest peak-day delivery through its distribution system of 1,319,361 Dths. This peak-day delivery consisted of 68% traditional retail sales service and 32% transportation service. MidAmerican Energy's 2022/2023 winter heating season preliminary peak-day delivery as of February 2, 2023, was 1,311,920 Dths, reached on December 22, 2022. This preliminary peak-day delivery consisted of 71% traditional retail sales service and 29% transportation service.

Natural Gas Supply and Capacity

MidAmerican Energy uses several strategies designed to maintain a reliable natural gas supply and reduce the impact of volatility in natural gas prices on its regulated retail natural gas customers. These strategies include the purchase of a geographically diverse supply portfolio from producers and third-party energy marketing companies, the use of interstate pipeline storage services and MidAmerican Energy's LNG peaking facilities, and the use of financial derivatives to fix the price on a portion of the anticipated natural gas requirements of MidAmerican Energy's customers. Refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the PGAs.

MidAmerican Energy contracts for firm natural gas pipeline capacity to transport natural gas from key production areas and liquid market centers to its service territory through direct interconnects to the pipeline systems of several interstate natural gas pipeline systems, including Northern Natural Gas, an affiliate company. MidAmerican Energy has multiple pipeline interconnections into several larger markets within its distribution system. Multiple pipeline interconnections create competition among pipeline suppliers for transportation capacity to serve those markets, thus reducing costs. In addition, multiple pipeline interconnections increase delivery reliability and give MidAmerican Energy the ability to optimize delivery of the lowest cost supply from the various production areas and liquid market centers into these markets. Benefits to MidAmerican Energy's distribution system customers are shared among all jurisdictions through a consolidated PGA.

At times, the natural gas pipeline capacity available through MidAmerican Energy's firm capacity portfolio may exceed the requirements of retail customers on MidAmerican Energy's distribution system. Firm capacity in excess of MidAmerican Energy's system needs can be released to other companies to achieve optimum use of the available capacity. Past IUB and South Dakota Public Utilities Commission ("SDPUC") rulings have allowed MidAmerican Energy to retain 30% of the revenue on the resold capacity, with the remaining 70% being returned to customers through the PGAs.

18


MidAmerican Energy utilizes interstate pipeline natural gas storage services to meet retail customer requirements, manage fluctuations in demand due to changes in weather and other usage factors and manage variation in seasonal natural gas pricing. MidAmerican Energy typically withdraws natural gas from storage during the heating season when customer demand is historically at its peak and injects natural gas into storage during off-peak months when customer demand is historically lower. MidAmerican Energy also utilizes its three LNG facilities to meet peak day demands during the winter heating season. Interstate pipeline storage services and MidAmerican Energy's LNG facilities reduce dependence on natural gas purchases during the volatile winter heating season and can deliver a significant portion of MidAmerican Energy's anticipated retail sales requirements on a peak winter day. For MidAmerican Energy's 2022/2023 winter heating season preliminary peak-day of December 22, 2022, supply sources used to meet deliveries to traditional retail sales service customers included 54% from purchases delivered on interstate pipelines, 35% from interstate pipeline storage services and 11% from MidAmerican Energy's LNG facilities.

MidAmerican Energy attempts to optimize the value of its regulated transportation capacity, natural gas supply and interstate pipeline storage services by engaging in wholesale transactions. IUB and SDPUC rulings have allowed MidAmerican Energy to retain 50% of the respective jurisdictional margins earned on certain wholesale sales of natural gas, with the remaining 50% being returned to customers through the PGAs.

MidAmerican Energy is not aware of any factors that would cause material difficulties in meeting its anticipated retail customer demand under normal operating conditions for the foreseeable future.

Energy Efficiency Programs

MidAmerican Energy has provided a comprehensive set of demand- and energy-reduction programs to its Iowa electric and natural gas customers since 1990. The programs, collectively referred to as energy efficiency programs, are designed to reduce energy consumption and more effectively manage when energy is used, including management of seasonal peak loads. Current programs offer services to customers such as energy engineering audits and information on how to improve the efficiency of their homes and businesses. To assist customers in investing in energy efficiency, MidAmerican Energy offers rebates or incentives encouraging the purchase and installation of high-efficiency equipment such as lighting, heating and cooling equipment, weatherization, motors, process equipment and systems, as well as incentives for efficient construction. Incentives are also paid to residential customers who participate in the air conditioner load control program and nonresidential customers who participate in the nonresidential load management program. In Iowa, legislation passed in 2018 provides that projected cumulative average annual costs for a natural gas energy efficiency plan cannot exceed 1.5% of expected Iowa natural gas retail revenue and, for an electric demand response plan and separately for an electric energy efficiency plan other than demand response, cannot exceed 2.0% of expected annual Iowa electric retail revenue. Although subject to prudence reviews, state regulations allow for contemporaneous recovery of costs incurred for energy efficiency programs through state-specific energy efficiency service charges paid by all retail electric and natural gas customers. In 2022, $43 million was expensed for MidAmerican Energy's energy efficiency programs, which resulted in estimated first-year energy savings of 133,000 MWhs of electricity and 174,000 Dths of natural gas and an estimated peak load reduction of 384 MWs of electricity and 2,444 Dths per day of natural gas.

Human Capital

Employees

All of MidAmerican Funding's employees are employed by MidAmerican Energy. As of December 31, 2022, MidAmerican Energy had approximately 3,400 employees, of which approximately 1,400 were covered by union contracts. MidAmerican Energy has three separate contracts with locals of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union. A contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers covering substantially all of the union employees expires April 30, 2027. For more information regarding MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.

19


NV ENERGY (NEVADA POWER AND SIERRA PACIFIC)

General

NV Energy, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is an energy holding company headquartered in Nevada whose principal subsidiaries are Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are indirect consolidated subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway. Nevada Power is a U.S. regulated electric utility company serving 1.0 million retail customers primarily in the Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson and adjoining areas. Sierra Pacific is a U.S. regulated electric and natural gas utility company serving 0.4 million retail electric customers and 0.2 million retail and transportation natural gas customers in northern Nevada. The Nevada Utilities are principally engaged in the business of generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electricity and, in the case of Sierra Pacific, in distributing, selling and transporting natural gas. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific have electric service territories covering approximately 4,500 square miles and 41,400 square miles, respectively. Sierra Pacific has a natural gas service territory covering approximately 900 square miles in Reno and Sparks. Principal industries served by the Nevada Utilities include gaming, recreation, warehousing, manufacturing and governmental services. Sierra Pacific also serves the mining industry. The Nevada Utilities buy and sell electricity on the wholesale market with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants to balance and optimize economic benefits of electricity generation, retail customer loads and wholesale transactions.

The Nevada Utilities' electric and natural gas operations are conducted under numerous nonexclusive franchise agreements, revocable permits and licenses obtained from federal, state and local authorities. The franchise agreements, with various expiration dates, are typically for 20- to 25-year terms. The Nevada Utilities operate under certificates of public convenience and necessity as regulated by the PUCN, and as such the Nevada Utilities have an obligation to provide electricity service to those customers within their service territory. In return, the PUCN has established rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow the Nevada Utilities an opportunity to recover all prudently incurred costs of providing services and an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on their investment.

NV Energy's monthly net income is affected by the seasonal impact of weather on electricity and natural gas sales and seasonal retail electricity prices from the Nevada Utilities'. For 2022, 78% of NV Energy annual net income was recorded in the months of June through September.

Regulated electric utility operations is Nevada Power's only segment while regulated electric utility operations and regulated natural gas operations are the two segments of Sierra Pacific.

Sierra Pacific's operating revenue and operating income derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 were as follows (dollars in millions):
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Electric$1,025 86 %$848 88 %$738 86 %
Gas168 14 117 12 116 14 
Total operating revenue$1,193 100 %$965 100 %$854 100 %
Operating income:
Electric$146 88 %$148 89 %$147 89 %
Gas19 12 19 11 18 11 
Total operating income$165 100 %$167 100 %$165 100 %

Nevada Power was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in 1929 and its principal executive offices are located at 6226 West Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146, its telephone number is (702) 402-5000 and its internet address is www.nvenergy.com.

Sierra Pacific was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in 1912 and its principal executive offices are located at 6100 Neil Road, Marshall, GrandeReno, Nevada 89511, its telephone number is (775) 834-4011 and its internet address is www.nvenergy.com.

20


Regulated Electric Operations

Customers

The Nevada Utilities' sell electricity to retail customers in a single state jurisdiction. Electricity sold to the Nevada Utilities' retail and wholesale customers by class of customer and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Nevada Power:
GWhs sold:
Residential10,299 42 %10,415 44 %10,477 46 %
Commercial4,904 21 4,838 21 4,591 20 
Industrial5,630 23 5,270 22 4,881 21 
Other191 198 195 
Total fully bundled21,024 87 20,721 88 20,144 88 
Distribution only service2,786 11 2,646 11 2,425 11 
Total retail23,810 98 23,367 99 22,569 99 
Wholesale586 356 374 
Total GWhs sold24,396 100 %23,723 100 %22,943 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential886 89 %871 88 %856 88 %
Commercial113 11 112 12 110 12 
Industrial— — — 
Total1,001 100 %985 100 %968 100 %
Sierra Pacific:
GWhs sold:
Residential2,747 22 %2,769 23 %2,672 23 %
Commercial3,124 26 3,056 26 2,977 26 
Industrial2,867 23 3,716 31 3,544 31 
Other13 — 15 — 15 — 
Total fully bundled8,751 71 9,556 80 9,208 80 
Distribution only service2,757 23 1,639 14 1,670 15 
Total retail11,508 94 11,195 94 10,878 95 
Wholesale741 656 548 
Total GWhs sold12,249 100 %11,851 100 %11,426 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential322 87 %316 87 %310 86 %
Commercial49 13 49 13 49 14 
Total371 100 %365 100 %359 100 %

Variations in weather, economic conditions, particularly for gaming, mining and wholesale customers and various conservation, energy efficiency and private generation measures and programs can impact customer energy requirements. Wholesale sales are impacted by market prices for energy relative to the incremental cost to generate power.

There are seasonal variations in the Nevada Utilities' electric business that are principally related to weather and the related use of electricity for air conditioning. Typically, 48-52% of Nevada Power's and 37-40% of Sierra Pacific's regulated electric revenue is reported in the months of June through September.

21


The annual hourly peak customer demand on the Nevada Utilities' electric systems occurs as a result of air conditioning use during the cooling season. Peak demand represents the highest demand on a given day and at a given hour. On July 11, 2022, customer usage of electricity caused an hourly peak demand of 6,033 MWs on Nevada Power's electric system, which is 267 MWs less than the record hourly peak demand of 6,300 MWs set July 9, 2021. On July 27, 2022, customer usage of electricity caused an hourly peak demand of 1,962 MWs on Sierra Pacific's electric system, which is 144 MWs less than the record hourly peak demand of 2,106 MWs set July 12, 2021.

Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply

The Nevada Utilities have ownership interest in a diverse portfolio of generating facilities. The following table presents certain information regarding the Nevada Utilities' owned generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:
FacilityNet Owned
Net CapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy SourceInstalled
(MWs)(1)
(MWs)(1)
Nevada Power:
NATURAL GAS:
LenzieLas Vegas, NVNatural gas20061,185 1,185 
ClarkLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1973-20081,102 1,102 
Harry AllenLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1995-2011628 628 
HigginsPrimm, NVNatural gas2004589 589 
SilverhawkLas Vegas, NVNatural gas2004590 590 
Las VegasLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1994-2003272 272 
Sun PeakLas Vegas, NVNatural gas/oil1991210 210 
4,576 4,576 
RENEWABLES:
NellisLas Vegas, NVSolar201515 15 
GoodspringsGoodsprings, NVWaste heat2010
20 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity4,596 4,596 
Sierra Pacific:
NATURAL GAS:
TracySparks, NVNatural gas1974-2008773 773 
Ft. ChurchillYerington, NVNatural gas1968-1971196 196 
Clark MountainSparks, NVNatural gas1994132 132 
1,101 1,101 
COAL:
Valmy Unit Nos. 1 and 2Valmy, NVCoal1981-1985522 261 
RENEWABLES:
Ft. ChurchillYerington, NVSolar201520 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity1,643 1,382 
Total NV Energy Available Generating Capacity6,239 5,978 
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
Dry LakeDry Lake, NVSolarEst. 2023150 150 
6,389 6,128 
(1)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates Nevada Power or Sierra Pacific's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.

22


The following table shows the percentages of the Nevada Utilities' total energy supplied by energy source for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Nevada Power:
Total energy generated - natural gas60 %64 %66 %
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
23 19 15 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)10 13 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other
100 %100 %100 %
Sierra Pacific:
Natural gas41 %43 %48 %
Coal11 11 
Total energy generated52 54 56 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
28 17 15 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)11 14 24 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other15 
100 %100 %100 %
(1)     All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.

The Nevada Utilities are required to have resources available to continuously meet their customer needs and reliably operate their electric systems. The percentage of the Nevada Utilities' energy supplied by energy source varies from year-to-year and is subject to numerous operational and economic factors such as planned and unplanned outages; fuel commodity prices; fuel transportation costs; weather; environmental considerations; transmission constraints; and wholesale market prices of electricity. The Nevada Utilities evaluate these factors continuously in order to facilitate economic dispatch of their generating facilities. When factors for one energy source are less favorable, the Nevada Utilities place more reliance on other energy sources. As long as the Nevada Utilities' purchases are deemed prudent by the PUCN, through their annual prudency review, the Nevada Utilities are permitted to recover the cost of fuel and purchased power. The Nevada Utilities also have the ability to reset quarterly the BTERs, with PUCN approval, based on the last 12 months fuel costs and purchased power and to reset quarterly DEAA.

The Nevada Utilities have adopted an approach to managing the energy supply function that has three primary elements. The first element is a set of management guidelines for procuring and optimizing the supply portfolio that is consistent with the requirements of a load serving entity with a full requirements obligation, and with the growth of private generation serving a small but growing group of customers with partial requirements. The second element is an energy risk management and control approach that ensures clear separation of roles between the day-to-day management of risks and compliance monitoring and control and ensures clear distinction between policy setting (or planning) and execution. Lastly, the Nevada Utilities pursue a process of ongoing regulatory involvement and acknowledgment of the resource portfolio management plans.

The Nevada Utilities have entered into multiple long-term power purchase contracts (three or more years) with suppliers that generate electricity utilizing renewable resources and natural gas. Nevada Power has entered into contracts with a total capacity of 3,522 MWs with contract termination dates ranging from 2023 to 2067. Included in these contracts are 3,352 MWs of capacity from renewable energy, of which 1,818 MWs of capacity are under development or construction and not currently available. Sierra Pacific has entered into contracts with a total capacity of 985 MWs with contract termination dates ranging from 2023 to 2049. Included in these contracts are 973 MWs of capacity from renewable energy, of which 25 MWs of capacity are under development or construction and not currently available.

The Nevada Utilities manage certain risks relating to their supply of electricity and fuel requirements by entering into various contracts, which may be accounted for as derivatives, including forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements. Refer to NV Energy's "General Regulation" section in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of energy cost recovery by jurisdiction and Nevada Power's Item 7A and Sierra Pacific's Item 7A in this Form 10-K for a discussion of commodity price risk and derivative contracts.

23


Natural Gas

The Nevada Utilities rely on indexed physical gas purchases for the majority of natural gas needed to operate their generating facilities. To secure natural gas supplies for the generating facilities, the Nevada Utilities execute purchases pursuant to a PUCN approved four season laddering strategy. In 2022, natural gas supply net purchases averaged 299,831 and 149,418 Dths per day with the winter period contracts averaging 256,039 and 120,985 Dths per day and the summer period contracts averaging 330,731 and 189,714 Dths per day for Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, respectively. The Nevada Utilities believe supplies from these sources are presently adequate and available to meet its needs.

The Nevada Utilities contract for firm natural gas pipeline capacity to transport natural gas from production areas to their service territory through direct interconnects to the pipeline systems of several interstate natural gas pipeline systems, including Nevada Power who contracts with Kern River, an affiliated company. Sierra Pacific utilizes natural gas storage contracted from interstate pipelines to meet retail customer requirements and to manage the daily changes in demand due to changes in weather and other usage factors. The stored natural gas is typically replaced during off-peak months when the demand for natural gas is historically lower than during the heating season.

Coal

Sierra Pacific relies on spot market solicitations for coal supplies and will regularly monitor the western coal market for opportunities to meet these needs. Sierra Pacific has a transportation services contract with Union Pacific Railroad Company to ship coal from various origins in central Utah, western Colorado and Wyoming that expires December 31, 2025. Sierra Pacific has a coal purchase agreement that extends through December 2023. The Valmy generating facility, Sierra Pacific's remaining facility requiring coal, has an approved retirement date of December 2025. Nevada Power has no coal requirements.

Energy Imbalance Market

The Nevada Utilities participate in the EIM operated by the California ISO, which reduces costs to serve customers through more efficient dispatch of a larger and more diverse pool of resources, more effectively integrates renewables and enhances reliability through improved situational awareness and responsiveness. The EIM expands the real-time component of the California ISO's market technology to optimize and balance electricity supply and demand every five minutes across the EIM footprint. The EIM is voluntary and available to all balancing authorities in the western U.S. EIM market participants submit bids to the California ISO market operator before each hour for each generating resource they choose to be dispatched by the market. Each bid is comprised of a dispatchable operating range, ramp rate and prices across the operating range. The California ISO market operator uses sophisticated technology to select the least-cost resources to meet demand and send simultaneous dispatch signals to every participating generator across the EIM footprint every five minutes. In addition to generation resource bids, the California ISO market operator also receives continuous real-time updates of the transmission grid network, meteorological and load forecast information that it uses to optimize dispatch instructions. Outside the EIM footprint, utilities in the western U.S. do not utilize comparable technology and are largely limited to transactions within the borders of their balancing authority area to balance supply and demand intra-hour using a combination of manual and automated dispatch. The EIM delivers customer benefits by leveraging automation and resource diversity to result in more efficient dispatch, more effective integration of renewables and improved situational awareness. Benefits are expected to increase further with renewable resource expansion and as more entities join the EIM bringing incremental diversity.

Transmission and Distribution

The Nevada Utilities' transmission system is part of the Western Interconnection, a regional grid in the U.S. The Western Interconnection includes the interconnected transmission systems of 14 western states, two Canadian provinces and parts of Mexico. The Nevada Utilities' transmission system, together with contractual rights on other transmission systems, enables the Nevada Utilities to integrate and access generation resources to meet their customer load requirements. Nevada Power's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 1,900 miles of transmission lines, 14,000 miles of distribution lines and 220 substations as of December 31, 2022. Sierra Pacific's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 4,200 miles of transmission lines, 9,600 miles of distribution lines and 210 substations as of December 31, 2022.

24


ON Line is a 231-mile, 500-kV transmission line connecting Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's service territories. ON Line provides the ability to jointly dispatch energy throughout Nevada and provide access to renewable energy resources in parts of northern and eastern Nevada, which enhances the Nevada Utilities' ability to manage and optimize their generating facilities. ON Line provides between 600 MWs northbound and 900 MWs southbound of transfer capability with interconnection between the Robinson Summit substation on the Sierra Pacific system and the Harry Allen substation on the Nevada Power system. ON Line was a joint project between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC. The Nevada Utilities own a 25% interest in ON Line and have entered into a long-term transmission use agreement with Great Basin Transmission, LLC for its 75% interest in ON Line until 2054. The Nevada Utilities share of its 25% interest in ON Line and the long-term transmission use agreement is split 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific.

The PUCN has approved the Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program, with an estimated cost of approximately $2.6 billion, which builds a foundation for the Nevada Utilities to accommodate existing and future transmission network customers, increase transmission system reliability, create access to diversified renewable resources, facilitate development of existing designated solar energy zones, facilitate conventional generation retirement and achieve Nevada's carbon reduction and eventual net-zero objectives. The Greenlink program consists of a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. The Greenlink program will be constructed in stages that are estimated to be placed in-service between December 2026 and December 2028. The Nevada Utilities will jointly own and operate the Greenlink transmission lines. Through December 31, 2022, $51 million had been spent.

Future Generation, Conservation and Energy Efficiency

Energy Supply Planning

Within the energy supply planning process, there are four key components covering different time frames:

IRPs are filed by the Nevada Utilities for approval by the PUCN every three years and the Nevada Utilities may, as necessary, file amendments to their IRPs. IRPs are prepared in compliance with Nevada laws and regulations and cover a 20-year period. Nevada law governing the IRP process was modified in 2017 and now requires joint filings by Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. IRPs develop a comprehensive, integrated plan that considers customer energy requirements and propose the resources to meet those requirements in a manner that is consistent with prevailing market fundamentals. The ultimate goal of the IRPs is to balance the objectives of minimizing costs and reducing volatility while reliably meeting the electric needs of the Nevada Utilities' customers. Costs incurred to complete projects approved through the IRP process still remain subject to review for reasonableness by the PUCN.
Energy Supply Plans ("ESP") are filed with the PUCN for approval and operate in conjunction with the PUCN-approved 20-year IRP. The ESP has a one- to three-year planning horizon and is an intermediate-term resource procurement and risk management plan that establishes the supply portfolio strategies within which intermediate-term resource requirements will be met with PUCN approval required for executing contracts of longer than three years.
Distributed Resource Plans ("DRP") are filed with the PUCN for approval and operate in conjunction with the PUCN-approved 20-year IRP. The DRP establishes a formal process to aid in the cost-effective integration of distributed resources into the Nevada Utilities' distribution and transmission process and ultimately the NV Energy utilities' electricity grid.
Action plans are filed with the PUCN for approval and operate in conjunction with the PUCN-approved 20-year IRP and PUCN-approved ESP. The action plan establishes tactical execution activities with a three-year focus.

25


In June 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed a joint application for approval of their 2022-2041 Triennial IRP, 2022-2024 ESP and 2022-2024 Action Plan. As part of the filing, the Nevada Utilities requested approval of 600 MWs of solar photovoltaic generating resources with 480 MWs of battery energy storage capacity, three battery energy storage projects with 66 MWs of capacity, the acquisition of one existing solar photovoltaic generating facility with 19.5 MWs of capacity that is currently leased to Sierra Pacific, and network upgrades associated with the new renewable energy projects. In September 2021, a hearing was held for the generation upgrades portion of the application, which resulted in an order approving that portion of the joint IRP. The Nevada Utilities filed a partial party stipulation resolving all issues related to the ESP, load forecast and fuel and purchased power price portions of the joint IRP. In October 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed a corrected stipulation, which was approved by the PUCN. In November 2021, a hearing was conducted for the remaining portions of the joint IRP and in December 2021, the PUCN issued an order granting in part and denying in part. The PUCN approved the construction of the 600 MWs of solar photovoltaic generating resources with 480 MWs of battery energy storage capacity, the acquisition of the existing solar photovoltaic generating facility and the network upgrade, among other items. However, the three additional battery energy storage projects were deferred for approval in future plans and the PUCN declined to retire Valmy 1 early and made adjustments to the approved budget for developing and conducting the distributed resource energy trial.

In September 2021, in compliance with Senate Bill ("SB") 448, the Nevada Utilities filed an amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for approval of their Transmission Infrastructure for a Clean Energy Economy Plan that sets forth a plan for the construction of certain high-voltage transmission infrastructure which includes a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line known as Greenlink North and a 32-mile, 525-kV transmission segment of Greenlink West. In January 2022, the Nevada Utilities reached a settlement with all the intervening parties and presented a stipulation before the PUCN related to the Greenlink transmission project. The settlement allows for the Nevada Utilities to receive approval to construct the Greenlink North project and the remaining segment of the Greenlink West project. The settlement allows the Nevada Utilities to designate these projects as critical facilities that will allow the Nevada Utilities to propose financial incentives in future proceedings. Potential financial incentives include construction work in process included in rate base and the ability to use regulatory asset accounting treatment. The Nevada Utilities agreed not to seek an enhanced return on investment at the state level as part of the settlement. The stipulation was approved by the PUCN in January 2022.

In March 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed the first amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for approval of the battery energy storage system with 220 MWs of capacity; a $3.5 million funding request to further study and perform due diligence on the pumped storage hydro project with a capacity of 1,000 MW, an addition of the geothermal facility purchase power agreement for 25 MW of renewable energy, peak firing project upgrades at the existing generating units to yield 48 MW of additional on-peak generation thermal energy storage project to increase the generating station's peak capacity by 18 MW, and network upgrades associated with the battery energy storage system. In April 2022, a partial stipulation was filed to remedy the redaction of the purchase power agreement pricing and in June 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed a settlement stipulation resolving all remaining issues. The PUCN approved the stipulation in July 2022.

In compliance with SB 448, the Nevada Utilities filed their second and third amendments to the 2021 joint IRP in July and September 2022, respectively. The Nevada Utilities requested an approval to amend the Demand Side Plan for the action period for 2022-2024 in July's filing and requested in September an approval of a DRP amendment to implement the state's first Transportation Electrification Plan ("TEP") and approve proposed tariffs and schedules to implement the TEP. In November 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed an all-party settlement stipulation of the second amendment to the IRP, resolving all issues. A hearing related to the application for approval of the third amendment was held in February 2023.

In November 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed their fourth amendment to the 2021 joint IRP requesting an approval of a generation update to the Supply Plan, an addition of 400 MW of peaking combustion turbines, a 120 MW geothermal portfolio long-term power purchase agreement, a 20 MW new geothermal technology long-term purchase power agreement, and a 200 MW grid-tied battery energy storage system at the Valmy generating facility as well as necessary transmission upgrades. An order is expected in the first half of 2023.

26


Energy Efficiency Programs

The Nevada Utilities have provided a comprehensive set of energy efficiency, demand response and conservation programs to their Nevada electric customers. The programs are designed to reduce energy consumption and more effectively manage when energy is used, including management of seasonal peak loads. Current programs offer services to customers such as energy audits and customer education and awareness efforts that provide information on how to improve the efficiency of their homes and businesses. To assist customers in investing in energy efficiency, the Nevada Utilities have offered rebates or incentives encouraging the purchase and installation of high-efficiency equipment such as lighting, heating and cooling equipment, weatherization, motors, process equipment and systems, as well as incentives for efficient construction. Incentives are also paid to residential customers who participate in the air conditioner load control program and nonresidential customers who participate in the nonresidential load management program. Energy efficiency program costs are recovered through annual rates set by the PUCN and adjusted based on the Nevada Utilities' annual filing to recover current program costs and any over or under collections from the prior filing, subject to prudence review. During 2022, Nevada Power spent $34 million on energy efficiency programs, resulting in an estimated 205,974 MWhs of electric energy savings and an estimated 179 MWs of electric peak load management. During 2022, Sierra Pacific spent $8 million on energy efficiency programs, resulting in an estimated 40,539 MWhs of electric energy savings and an estimated 23 MWs of electric peak load management.

Regulated Natural Gas Operations

Sierra Pacific is engaged in the distribution of natural gas to customers in its service territory and the related procurement, transportation and storage of natural gas for the benefit of those customers. Sierra Pacific purchases natural gas from various suppliers and contracts with interstate natural gas pipelines for transportation of the natural gas from the production areas to Sierra Pacific's service territory and for storage services to manage fluctuations in system demand and seasonal pricing. Sierra Pacific sells natural gas and delivery services to end-use customers on its distribution system; sells natural gas to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies; and transports natural gas through its distribution system for a number of end-use customers who have independently secured their supply of natural gas. During 2022, 7% of the total natural gas delivered through Sierra Pacific's distribution system was for transportation service.

Natural gas property consists primarily of natural gas mains and service lines, meters, and related distribution equipment, including feeder lines to communities served from natural gas pipelines owned by others. The natural gas distribution facilities of Sierra Pacific included 3,600 miles of natural gas mains and service lines as of December 31, 2022.

Customer Usage and Seasonality

The percentages of natural gas sold to Sierra Pacific's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer, total Dths of natural gas sold, total Dths of transportation service and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Residential55 %53 %56 %
Commercial(1)
28 28 28 
Industrial(1)
11 10 10 
Total retail94 91 94 
Wholesale(2)
100 %100 %100 %
Total Dths of natural gas sold (in thousands)20,62220,05018,622
Total Dths of transportation service (in thousands)1,5761,8502,217
Total average number of retail customers (in thousands)180177174

(1)Commercial and industrial customers are classified primarily based on the nature of their business and natural gas usage. Commercial customers are non-residential customers with monthly gas usage less than 12,000 therms during five consecutive winter months. Industrial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas in excess of 12,000 therms during one or more winter months.

(2)Wholesale sales are generally made to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies for eventual resale to end-use customers.

27


There are seasonal variations in Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas business that are principally due to the use of natural gas for heating. Typically, 47-56% of Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas revenue is reported in the months of December through March.

On December 18, 2022, Sierra Pacific recorded its highest peak-day natural gas delivery of 152,157 Dths, which is 11,417 Dths less than the record peak-day delivery of 163,574 Dths set on December 9, 2013. This peak-day delivery consisted of 96% traditional retail sales service and 4% transportation service.

Fuel Supply and Capacity

The purchase of natural gas for Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas operations is done in combination with the purchase of natural gas for Sierra Pacific's regulated electric operations. In response to energy supply challenges, Sierra Pacific has adopted an approach to managing the energy supply function that has three primary elements, as discussed earlier under Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply. Similar to Sierra Pacific's regulated electric operations, as long as Sierra Pacific's purchases of natural gas are deemed prudent by the PUCN, through its annual prudency review, Sierra Pacific is permitted to recover the cost of natural gas. Sierra Pacific also has the ability, with PUCN approval, to reset quarterly the BTERs, based on the last 12 months fuel costs, and to reset quarterly DEAA.

Human Capital

Employees

As of December 31, 2022, Nevada Power had approximately 1,400 employees, of which approximately 700 were covered by a union contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific had approximately 1,000 employees, of which approximately 500 were covered by a union contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

For more information regarding Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.

NORTHERN POWERGRID

Northern Powergrid, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is a holding company which owns two companies that distribute electricity in Great Britain, Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc. In addition to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, Northern Powergrid also owns a meter asset rental business that leases meters to energy suppliers in the United Kingdom, an engineering contracting business that provides electrical infrastructure contracting services primarily to third parties, a hydrocarbon exploration and development business that is focused on developing integrated upstream gas projects in Europe and Australia and ownership interests in two solar generation facilities in Australia having a total net owned capacity of 260 MWs.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies serve 4.0 million end-users and operate in the north-east of England from North Northumberland through Tyne and Wear, County Durham and Yorkshire to North Lincolnshire, an area covering 10,000 square miles. The principal function of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies is to build, maintain and operate the electricity distribution network through which the end-user receives a supply of electricity.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies receive electricity from the national grid transmission system and from generators that are directly connected to the distribution network and distribute it to end-users' premises using their networks of transformers, switchgear and distribution lines and cables. Substantially all of the end-users in the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution service areas are directly or indirectly connected to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' networks and electricity can only be delivered to these end-users through their distribution systems, thus providing the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies with distribution volumes that are relatively stable from year to year. The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies charge fees for the use of their distribution systems to the suppliers of electricity.

28


The suppliers purchase electricity from generators, sell the electricity to end-user customers and use the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution networks pursuant to an industry standard "Distribution Connection and Use of System Agreement." During 2022, E.ON and certain of its affiliates and British Gas Trading Limited represented 22% and 14%, respectively, of the total combined distribution revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies. Variations in demand from end-users can affect the revenues that are received by the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies in any year, but such variations have no effect on the total revenue that the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies are allowed to recover in a price control period. Under- or over-recoveries against price-controlled revenues are carried forward into prices for future years.

During 2021, 28 suppliers went bankrupt due to rising wholesale prices, particularly for natural gas. This resulted in energy supply costs being higher than the Ofgem set variable tariff price cap that can be charged to customers. Any distribution use of system bad debts suffered by Northern Powergrid is recoverable in future distribution use of systems revenue.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' combined service territory features a diverse economy with no dominant sector. The mix of rural, agricultural, urban and industrial areas covers a broad customer base ranging from domestic usage through farming and retail to major industry including automotives, chemicals, mining, steelmaking and offshore marine construction. The industry within the area is concentrated around the principal centers of Newcastle, Middlesbrough, Sheffield and Leeds.

The price-controlled revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies is set out in the special conditions of the licenses of those companies. The licenses are enforced by the regulator, GEMA, through Ofgem, and limit increases to allowed revenues (or may require decreases) based upon the rate of inflation, other specified factors and other regulatory action. The current electricity distribution price control became effective April 1, 2015 and will continue through March 31, 2023. Ofgem has set the next price control for the five-year period from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2028. The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies published and filed their business plans for the next price control period with Ofgem in December 2021 with final determinations published in November 2022. The remaining necessary step for this price control to be effective is the statutory modification of the license, which was published by Ofgem on February 3, 2023 and will become effective on April 1, 2023.

GWhs and percentages of electricity distributed to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' end-users and the total number of end-users as of and for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
GWhs distributed:
Residential11,880 37 %13,334 39 %12,946 40 %
Commercial3,737 12 3,643 11 3,459 10 
Industrial16,239 50 16,424 49 15,917 49 
Other301 318 359 
32,157 100 %33,719 100 %32,681 100 %
Number of end-users (in thousands):3,953 3,941 3,934 

As of December 31, 2022, the combined electricity distribution network of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies included approximately 17,000 miles of overhead lines, 43,400 miles of underground cables and 810 major substations.

29


BHE PIPELINE GROUP (EASTERN ENERGY GAS AND EGTS)

The BHE Pipeline Group consists of BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas and Kern River, each an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. The BHE Pipeline Group operates approximately 21,200 miles of pipeline with a design capacity of approximately 21.1 Bcf of natural gas per day, transported approximately 15% of the total natural gas consumed in the U.S. during 2022 and owns assets in 27 states. The BHE Pipeline Group also operates 22 natural gas storage facilities with a total working gas capacity of 515.6 Bcf and an LNG export, import and storage facility.

The Pipeline Companies compete with other pipelines on the basis of cost, flexibility, reliability of service and overall customer service, with the customer's decision being made primarily on the basis of delivered price, which includes both the natural gas commodity cost and transportation costs. The Pipeline Companies also compete with midstream operators and gas marketers seeking to provide or arrange transportation, storage and other services to meet customer needs. Natural gas competes with alternative energy sources, including coal, nuclear energy, wind, geothermal, solar and fuel oil and the electricity generated from these alternative energy sources. The Pipeline Companies generate a substantial portion of their revenue from long-term firm contracts for transportation and storage services and are therefore insulated from competitive factors during the terms of the contracts. When these long-term contracts expire, the Pipeline Companies face competitive pressures from other natural gas pipeline facilities.

Subject to regulatory requirements, the Pipeline Companies attempt to recontract or remarket capacity at the maximum rates allowed under their tariffs, although at times the Pipeline Companies discount these rates to remain competitive. Historically, the Pipeline Companies have been able to provide competitively priced services because of access to a variety of relatively low cost supply basins, cost control measures and the relatively high level of firm entitlement that is sold on a seasonal and annual basis, which lowers the per unit cost of transportation. To date, the Pipeline Companies have avoided significant pipeline system bypasses.

BHE GT&S

BHE GT&S' operations, through its ownership of Eastern Energy Gas, includes three interstate natural gas pipeline systems, one of the nation's largest underground natural gas storage systems and one LNG export, import and storage facility. BHE GT&S' operations also include smaller LNG facilities, a field service company, and a gathering and processing company.

Eastern Energy Gas' principal subsidiaries are EGTS and Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC ("CGT"). EGTS' operations include natural gas transmission and storage pipelines located in Maryland, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. EGTS also operates one of the nation's largest underground natural gas storage systems located in New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. CGT's operations include an interstate natural gas pipeline system located in South Carolina and southeastern Georgia. Eastern Energy Gas also owns a 50% equity interest in Iroquois Gas Transmission System L.P. ("Iroquois"). Iroquois owns and operates an interstate natural gas pipeline located in the states of New York and Connecticut.

Eastern Energy Gas' LNG operations involve the export, import and storage of LNG at the Cove Point LNG Facility that is owned by Cove Point, located in Maryland, as well as the transmission of regasified LNG to the interstate pipeline grid and mid-Atlantic markets and the liquefaction of natural gas for export as LNG. Cove Point's LNG Facility has an operational peak regasification daily send-out capacity of approximately 1.8 million Dth and an aggregate LNG storage capacity of approximately 14.6 billions of cubic feet equivalent ("Bcfe"). In addition, Cove Point has a small liquefier that has the potential to produce approximately 15,000 Dth/day. The Liquefaction Facility consists of one LNG train with a nameplate outlet capacity of 5.25 million tonnes per annum ("Mtpa"). Cove Point has authorization from the DOE to export up to 0.77 Bcfe/day (approximately 5.75 Mtpa) should the Liquefaction Facility perform better than expected. Cove Point's 36-inch diameter underground interstate natural gas pipelines are approximately 139 miles, with interconnections to Transcontinental Gas Pipeline, LLC in Fairfax County, Virginia, and with Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and EGTS in Loudoun County, Virginia. Eastern Energy Gas operates, as the general partner, and owns a 25% limited partnership interest in the Cove Point LNG export, import and storage facility. BHE GT&S also operates and has ownership interests in three smaller LNG facilities in Alabama, Florida and Pennsylvania.

In total, Eastern Energy Gas operates approximately 5,400 miles of natural gas transmission, gathering and storage pipelines, of which approximately 5,200 miles are owned by Eastern Energy Gas, with a design capacity of 12.6 Bcf per day as well as approximately 100 miles of natural gas liquids pipelines operated by BHE GT&S. EGTS operates approximately 3,900 miles of natural gas transmission and storage pipelines with a design capacity of 9.9 Bcf per day. EGTS also operates 17 underground storage fields with a total working gas capacity of approximately 420 Bcf, of which approximately 307 Bcf relates to natural gas storage field capacity that EGTS owns. BHE GT&S' pipeline system is configured with approximately 365 active receipt and delivery points. In 2022, BHE GT&S delivered over 2.0 trillion cubic feet ("Tcf") of natural gas to its customers.
30



BHE GT&S' natural gas transmission and storage earnings primarily result from rates established by FERC. Revenues derived from BHE GT&S' pipeline operations are primarily from reservation charges for firm transmission and storage services as provided for in their FERC-approved tariffs. Reservation charges are required to be paid regardless of volumes transported or stored. The profitability of these businesses is dependent on their ability, through the rates they are permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on their capital investments. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 86% of BHE GT&S' transmission capacity is subscribed, including 81% under long-term contracts and 5% on a year-to-year basis, and approximately 97% of EGTS' storage capacity is subscribed with long-term contracts. As of December 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining contract term for Eastern Energy Gas' and EGTS' firm transmission contracts is seven years and six years, respectively, and EGTS' storage contracts is four years. Additionally, BHE GT&S receives revenue from firm fee-based contractual arrangements, including negotiated rates, for certain pipeline transmission and LNG storage and terminal services. Variability in BHE GT&S' earnings results from changes in operating and maintenance expenditures, as well as changes in rates and the demand for services, which are dependent on weather, changes in commodity prices and the economy.

BHE GT&S' operating revenue for the year ended December 31 was as follows (in millions):
20222021
Transmission$849 35 %$772 36 %
LNG790 33 704 32 
Storage316 13 251 12 
Gas, liquids and other sales447 19 433 20 
Total operating revenue$2,402 100 %$2,160 100 %

Except for quantities of natural gas owned and managed for operational and system balancing purposes, BHE GT&S does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system.

During 2022, BHE GT&S had two customers that each accounted for greater than 10% of its operating revenue and its 10 largest customers accounted for 45% of its total operating revenue. BHE GT&S has agreements with terms through 2038 to retain the majority of its two largest customers' volumes. The loss of any of these significant customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on BHE GT&S.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas had approximately 1,500 employees, consisting of approximately 1,200 natural gas operations employees and 300 corporate services employees. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 600 employees were covered by a union contract with the Utility Workers Union of America.

As of December 31, 2022, EGTS had approximately 1,300 employees, consisting of approximately 1,000 natural gas operations employees and 300 corporate services employees. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 600 employees were covered by a union contract with the Utility Workers Union of America.

For more information regarding Eastern Energy Gas' and EGTS' human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.

31


Northern Natural Gas

Northern Natural Gas owns the largest interstate natural gas pipeline system in the U.S., as measured by pipeline miles, which reaches from west Texas to Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Northern Natural Gas primarily transports and stores natural gas for utilities, municipalities, gas marketing companies and industrial and commercial users. Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system consists of two commercial segments. Its traditional end-use and distribution market area in the northern part of its system, referred to as the Market Area, includes points in Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Dakota, Michigan and Illinois. Its natural gas supply and delivery service area in the southern part of its system, referred to as the Field Area, includes points in Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. The Market Area and Field Area are separated at a Demarcation Point ("Demarc"). Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system consists of 14,400 miles of natural gas pipelines, including 5,900 miles of mainline transmission pipelines and 8,500 miles of branch and lateral pipelines, with a Market Area design capacity of 6.3 Bcf per day, a Field Area delivery capacity of 1.7 Bcf per day to the Market Area and 1.4 Bcf per day to the West Texas area and 95.6 Bcf of working gas capacity in five storage facilities. Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system is configured with approximately 2,215 active receipt and delivery points which are integrated with the facilities of LDCs. Many of Northern Natural Gas' LDC customers are part of combined utilities that also use natural gas as a fuel source for electric generation. Northern Natural Gas delivered over 1.4 Tcf of natural gas to its customers in 2022.

Northern Natural Gas' transportation rates and most of its storage rates are cost-based. These rates are designed to provide Northern Natural Gas with an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and earn a reasonable return on its investments. Substantially all of Northern Natural Gas' Market Area transportation revenue is generated from reservation charges, with the balance from usage charges. Most of Northern Natural Gas' transportation capacity in the Market Area is committed to customers under firm transportation contracts, where customers pay Northern Natural Gas a monthly reservation charge for the right to transport natural gas through Northern Natural Gas' system. Reservation charges are required to be paid regardless of volumes transported or stored. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 74% of Northern Natural Gas' customers' entitlement in the Market Area have terms beyond 2024 and approximately 61% beyond 2026. As of December 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining contract term for Northern Natural Gas' Market Area firm transportation contracts is six years. Northern Natural Gas' Field Area customers consist primarily of energy marketing companies, midstream companies and power generators that are connected to Northern Natural Gas' system in Texas and New Mexico that are contracted on a long-term basis with a weighted average remaining contract term of five years. Northern Natural Gas' storage services are provided through the operation of one underground natural gas storage field in Iowa and two underground natural gas storage facilities in Kansas. Additionally, Northern Natural Gas has two LNG storage peaking units, one in Iowa and one in Minnesota, that support its transportation service. The three underground natural gas storage facilities and two LNG storage peaking units have a total working gas capacity of over 95.6 Bcf and over 2.2 Bcf per day of peak delivery capability. The average remaining contract term for firm storage contracts is five years.

Northern Natural Gas' operating revenue for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Transportation:
Market Area$688 66 %$658 61 %$633 65 %
Field Area210 22 177 17 226 24 
Total transportation898 88 835 78 859 89 
Storage97 94 91 
Total transportation and storage revenue995 97 929 87 950 98 
Gas, liquids and other sales28 143 13 18 
Total operating revenue$1,023 100 %$1,072 100 %$968 100 %

Except for quantities of natural gas owned and managed for operational and system balancing purposes, Northern Natural Gas does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system. The sale of natural gas for operational and system balancing purposes accounts for the majority of the remaining operating revenue.

During 2022, Northern Natural Gas had two customers that each accounted for greater than 10% of its transportation and storage revenue and its 10 largest customers accounted for 63% of its system-wide transportation and storage revenue. Northern Natural Gas has agreements with terms through 2027 and 2034 to retain the majority of its two largest customers' volumes. The loss of either of these significant customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on Northern Natural Gas.

32


Kern River

Kern River owns an interstate natural gas pipeline system that extends from supply areas in the Rocky Mountains to consuming markets in Utah, Nevada and California. Kern River operates 1,400 miles of mainline natural gas pipelines, with a year-round design capacity of 2,166,575 Dths, or 2.2 Bcf, per day. Additional seasonal design capacity (Bell-Curve) is contracted in all months except July, August and September. The mainline pipeline extends from the system's point of origination near Opal, Wyoming, through the Central Rocky Mountains to Daggett, California. The mainline section consists of 1,300 miles of 36-inch diameter pipeline and 100 miles of various laterals that connect to the mainline. Kern River primarily transports and stores natural gas for utilities, municipalities, gas marketing companies, industrial and commercial users.

Kern River's rates are designed to provide Kern River with an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and earn a reasonable return on its investments and are based on a levelized rate design with recovery of 70% of the original investment during the initial long-term contracts ("Period One rates"). After expiration of the initial term, eligible customers have the option to elect service at rates ("Period Two rates") that are lower than Period One rates because they are designed to recover the remaining 30% of the original investment. To the extent that eligible customers do not contract for service at Period Two rates, the volumes are turned back to Kern River, and it resells capacity at market rates for varying terms. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 87% of Kern River's design capacity, including seasonal bell curve, totaled 2,345,381 Dths per day and is contracted pursuant to long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements, whereby Kern River receives natural gas on behalf of customers at designated receipt points and transports the natural gas on a firm basis to designated delivery points. In return for this service, each customer pays Kern River a fixed monthly reservation fee based on each customer's maximum daily quantity, which represents nearly 81% of total operating revenue, and a commodity charge based on the actual amount of natural gas transported pursuant to its long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements and Kern River's tariff. These long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements expire between February 2023 and October 2036 and have a weighted-average remaining contract term of over eight years. As of December 31, 2022, 74% of the year-round design capacity of 2,166,575 Dths under firm contract has primary delivery points in California, with the flexibility to access secondary delivery points in Nevada and Utah.

Except for quantities of natural gas owned for operational purposes, Kern River does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system. Kern River's transportation rates are cost-based.

During 2022, Kern River had two customers, including Nevada Power Company, an affiliated company, that each accounted for greater than 10% of its revenue. The loss of these significant customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on Kern River.

BHE TRANSMISSION

BHE Transmission consists of BHE Canada, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, BHE U.S. Transmission, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, ownership interests in generating facilities and 300 MWs of long-term northbound transmission rights on the Montana Alberta Tie Line (commencing April 30, 2026). BHE Canada and BHE U.S. Transmission together own and operate the Montana Alberta Tie Line, which is a 214-mile, 230-kV transmission line that runs from Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada to Great Falls, Montana, U.S. and connects power grids in the two jurisdictions.

BHE Canada

BHE Canada primarily owns AltaLink, a regulated electric transmission utility company headquartered in Alberta, Canada serving approximately 85% of Alberta's population. AltaLink's high voltage transmission lines and related facilities transmit electricity from generating facilities to major load centers, cities and large industrial plants throughout its 87,000 square mile service territory, which covers a diverse geographic area including most major urban centers in central and southern Alberta. AltaLink's transmission facilities, consisting of approximately 8,300 miles of transmission lines and approximately 310 substations as of December 31, 2022, are an integral part of the Alberta Interconnected Electric System ("AIES").

The AIES is a network or grid of transmission facilities operating at high voltages ranging from 69 kV to 500 kV. The grid delivers electricity from generating units across Alberta, Canada through approximately 16,000 miles of transmission lines. The AIES is interconnected to British Columbia's transmission system that links Alberta with the North American western interconnected system, interconnection with Saskatchewan's transmission system and interconnection with Montana's transmission system.

33


AltaLink is a transmission facility owner within the electricity industry in Alberta and is permitted to charge a tariff rate for the use of its transmission facilities. Such tariff rates are established on a cost-of-service regulatory model, which is designed to allow AltaLink an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its investments. Transmission tariff rates are approved by the AUC and are collected from the AESO.

The electricity industry in Alberta consists of four principal segments. Generators sell wholesale power into the power pool operated by the AESO and through direct contractual arrangements. Alberta's transmission system or grid is composed of high voltage power lines and related facilities that transmit electricity from generating facilities to distribution networks and directly connected end-users. Distribution facility owners are regulated by the AUC and are responsible for arranging for, or providing, regulated rate and regulated default supply services to convey electricity from transmission systems and distribution-connected generators to end-use customers. Retailers can procure energy through the power pool, through direct contractual arrangements with energy suppliers or ownership of generation facilities and arrange for its distribution to end-use customers.

The AESO mandate is defined in the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) and its regulations and requires the AESO to assess both current and future needs of Alberta's interconnected electrical system. In January 2022, the AESO released the 2022 Long-term Transmission Plan. Updated every two years, the Long-Term Transmission Plan seeks to optimize the use of the existing transmission system and plan the development of new transmission to ensure a safe and reliable electricity system that enables a fair, efficient and openly competitive electricity market. The 2022 Long-Term Transmission Plan identifies C$1.3 billion in transmission projects over a 10 year period, which results in C$150 million to C$200 million per year on average over that 10 year period. This results in a cumulative transmission rate impact of C$2 per MWh for the first five to eight years, increasing to C$3 per MWh after 15 years. The Long-Term Transmission Plan identifies approximately C$900 million of projects in AltaLink's service territory with in-service dates before 2030.
BHE U.S. Transmission

BHE U.S. Transmission is engaged in various joint ventures to develop, own and operate transmission assets and is pursuing additional investment opportunities in the U.S. Currently, BHE U.S. Transmission has two joint ventures with transmission assets that are operational, ETT, a 50% owned joint venture with subsidiaries of American Electric Power Company, Inc. ("AEP"), and Prairie Pinyon Pines, Alamo 6Wind Transmission, LLC, a 25% owned joint venture with AEP and PearlEvergy, Inc. ETT owns and operates electric transmission assets in the ERCOT and, as of December 31, 2022, had total assets of $3.5 billion. ETT's transmission system includes approximately 1,900 miles of transmission lines and 42 substations as of December 31, 2022. Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC, owns and operates a 108-mile, 345-kV transmission project in Kansas having total assets of $133 million as of December 31, 2022.

Generating Facilities

BHE Transmission has ownership interests in the following generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:

PowerFacilityNet
PurchaseNetOwned
EnergyYearAgreementPowerCapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationSourceInstalledExpirationPurchaser
(MWs)(1)
(MWs)(1)
WIND:
RattlesnakeAlbertaWind20222042/2032Telus, RBC, Bullfrog, Shopify130 130 
Rim RockMontanaWind20122026Morgan Stanley189 189 
Glacier 1MontanaWind2008N/AN/A107 107 
Glacier 2MontanaWind2009N/AN/A103 103 
529 529 
NATURAL GAS:
Nat-1AlbertaNatural gas2015N/AN/A20 20 
20 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity549 549 
34


(1)    Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other     agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates BHE Transmission' ownership of Facility Net Capacity.

BHE RENEWABLES

The subsidiaries comprising the BHE Renewables reportable segment own interests in several independent power projects in the U.S. The following table presents certain information concerning these independent power projects as of December 31, 2022:
PowerFacilityNet
PurchaseNetOwned
EnergyYearAgreementPowerCapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationSourceInstalledExpiration
Purchaser(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
WIND:
Grande PrairieNebraskaWind20162036OPPD400 400 
Jumbo RoadTexasWind20152033AE300 300 
Santa RitaTexasWind20182025-2038KC, CODTX, MES300 300 
Mariah Del NorteTexasWind2016N/AN/A230 230 
Walnut RidgeIllinoisWind20182028USGSA212 212 
Flat TopTexasWind20192031Citi Commodities200 200 
Pinyon Pines ICaliforniaWind20122035SCE168 168 
Fluvanna IITexasWind20192024JP Morgan158 158 
Pinyon Pines IICaliforniaWind20122035SCE132 132 
Bishop Hill IIIllinoisWind20122032Ameren81 81 
MarshallKansasWind20162036MJMEC, KPP, KMEA & COIMO72 72 
IndependenceIowaWind20212041CIPCO54 54 
2,307 2,307 
SOLAR:
TopazCaliforniaSolar2013-20142039PG&E550 550 
Solar Star 1CaliforniaSolar2013-20152035SCE310 310 
Solar Star 2CaliforniaSolar2013-20152035SCE276 276 
Agua CalienteArizonaSolar2012-20132039PG&E290 142 
Alamo 6TexasSolar20172042CPS110 110 
Community Solar Gardens(5)
MinnesotaSolar2016-20182041-2043(4)98 98 
PearlTexasSolar20172042CPS50 50 
1,684 1,536 
NATURAL GAS:
CordovaIllinoisNatural Gas2001N/AN/A512 512 
Power ResourcesTexasNatural Gas1988N/AN/A212 212 
SaranacNew YorkNatural Gas1994N/AN/A245 196 
YumaArizonaNatural Gas19942024SDG&E50 50 
1,019 970 
GEOTHERMAL:
Imperial Valley ProjectsCaliforniaGeothermal1982-2000(3)(3)345 345 
345 345 
HYDROELECTRIC:
WailukuHawaiiHydroelectric19932023HELCO10 10 
10 10 
Total Available Generating Capacity5,365 5,168 

35


(1)San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E"); Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), Ameren Illinois Company ("Ameren"), Southern California Edison ("SCE"), Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. ("HELCO"); Austin Energy ("AE"); Omaha Public Power District ("OPPD"); Kimberly-Clark Corporation ("KC"); City of Denton, TX ("CODTX"); MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC ("MES"); U.S. General Services Administration ("USGSA"); Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Commission ("MJMEC"); Kansas Power Pool ("KPP"); Kansas Municipal Energy Agency ("KMEA"); City of Independence, MO ("COIMO"); CPS Energy ("CPS"); and Central Iowa Power Cooperative ("CIPCO").
(2)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates BHE Renewables' ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
(3)Approximately 12% of the Company's interests in the Imperial Valley Projects' Contract Capacity are Exempt Wholesale Generatorscurrently sold to Southern California Edison Company under a long-term power purchase agreement expiring in 2026. Certain long-term power purchase agreement renewals for 252 MWs have been entered into with other parties at fixed prices that expire from 2028 to 2039, of which 202 MWs mature in 2039.
(4)The power purchasers are commercial, industrial and not-for-profit organizations.
(5)The community solar gardens project is consolidated in the table above for convenience as it consists of 98 distinct entities that each own an approximately 1-MW solar garden with independent but substantially similar terms and conditions.

BHE Renewables' operating revenue derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 were as follows (dollars in millions):
202220212020
Solar$477 48 %$468 48 %$455 48 %
Wind228 23 160 16 183 20 
Geothermal212 21 178 18 173 18 
Hydro32 26 
Natural gas71 143 15 99 11 
Total operating revenue$993 100 %$981 100 %$936 100 %

HOMESERVICES

HomeServices, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is one of the largest residential real estate brokerage firms in the U.S. In addition to providing traditional residential real estate brokerage services, HomeServices offers other integrated real estate services, including mortgage originations and mortgage banking; title and closing services; property and casualty insurance; home warranties; relocation services; and other home-related services. HomeServices' real estate brokerage business is subject to seasonal fluctuations because more home sale transactions tend to close during the second and third quarters of the year. As a result, HomeServices' operating results and profitability are typically higher in the second and third quarters relative to the remainder of the year. HomeServices' owned brokerages currently operate in nearly 930 offices in 33 states and the District of Columbia with approximately 45,000 real estate agents under 55 brand names. The U.S. residential real estate brokerage business is subject to the general real estate market conditions, is highly competitive and consists of numerous local brokers and agents in each market seeking to represent sellers and buyers in residential real estate transactions.

HomeServices' franchise network currently includes approximately 300 franchisees and over 1,500 brokerage offices with nearly 51,000 real estate agents under two brand names, primarily in the U.S. In exchange for certain fees, HomeServices provides the right to use the Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices or Real Living brand names and other related service marks, as well as providing orientation programs, training and consultation services, advertising programs and other services.

GENERAL REGULATION

BHE's regulated subsidiaries and certain affiliates are subject to comprehensive governmental regulation, which significantly influences their operating environment, prices charged to customers, capital structure, costs and, ultimately, their ability to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on invested capital. In addition to the discussion contained herein regarding general regulation, refer to "Regulatory Matters" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding certain regulatory matters.

Domestic Regulated Public Utility Subsidiaries

The Utilities are subject to comprehensive regulation by various state, federal and local agencies. The more significant aspects of this regulatory framework are described below.

36


State Regulation

Historically, state regulatory commissions have established retail electric and natural gas rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow a utility the opportunity to recover what each state regulatory commission deems to be the utility's reasonable costs of providing services, including a fair opportunity to earn a reasonable return on its investments based on its cost of debt and equity. In addition to return on investment, a utility's cost of service generally reflects a representative level of prudent expenses, including cost of sales, operating expense, depreciation and amortization and income and other tax expense, reduced by wholesale electricity and other revenue. The allowed operating expenses are typically based on actual historical costs adjusted for known and measurable or forecasted changes. State regulatory commissions may adjust cost of service for various reasons, including pursuant to a review of: (a) the utility's revenue and expenses during a defined test period, (b) the utility's level of investment and (c) changes in income tax laws. State regulatory commissions typically have the authority to review and change rates on their own initiative; however, they may also initiate reviews at the request of a utility, utility customers or organizations representing groups of customers. In certain jurisdictions, the utility and such parties, however, may agree with one another not to request a review of or changes to rates for a specified period of time.

The retail electric rates of the Utilities are generally based on the cost of providing traditional bundled services, including generation, transmission and distribution services. The Utilities have established ECAMs and other cost recovery mechanisms in certain states, which help mitigate their exposure to changes in costs from those assumed in establishing base rates.

With certain limited exceptions, the Utilities have an exclusive right to serve retail customers within their service territories and, in turn, have an obligation to provide service to those customers. In some jurisdictions, certain classes of customers may choose to purchase all or a portion of their energy from alternative energy suppliers, and in some jurisdictions retail customers can generate all or a portion of their own energy. Under Oregon law, PacifiCorp has the exclusive right and obligation to provide electricity distribution services to all residential and nonresidential customers within its allocated service territory; however, nonresidential customers have the right to choose an alternative provider of energy supply. The impact of this right on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results has not been material. In Washington, state law does not provide for exclusive service territory allocation. PacifiCorp's service territory in Washington is surrounded by other public utilities with whom PacifiCorp has from time to time entered into service area agreements under the jurisdiction of the WUTC. Under California law, PacifiCorp has the exclusive right and obligation to provide electricity distribution services to all residential and nonresidential customers within its allocated service territory; however, cities, counties and certain other public agencies have the right to choose to generate energy supply or elect an alternative provider of energy supply through the formation of a Community Choice Aggregator ("EWG"CCA"). To date, no CCA activity has occurred in PacifiCorp's California service territory. If a CCA is formed, PacifiCorp would continue to provide CCA customers transmission, distribution, metering and billing services and the CCA would provide generation supply. In addition, PacifiCorp would likely be able to collect costs from CCA customers for the generation-related costs that PacifiCorp incurred while they were customers of PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp would remain the electricity provider of last resort for these customers. In Illinois, state law has established a competitive environment so that all Illinois customers are free to choose their retail service supplier. For customers that choose an alternative retail energy supplier, MidAmerican Energy continues to have an ongoing obligation to deliver the supplier's energy to the retail customer. MidAmerican Energy bills the retail customer for such delivery services. MidAmerican Energy also has an obligation to serve customers at regulated cost-based rates and has a continuing obligation to serve customers who have not selected a competitive electricity provider. The impact of this right on MidAmerican Energy's financial results has not been material. In Nevada, Chapter 704B of the Nevada Revised Statutes allows retail electric customers with an average annual load of one MW or more to file a letter of intent and application with the PUCN to acquire electric energy and ancillary services from another energy supplier. The law requires customers wishing to choose a new supplier to receive the approval of the PUCN to meet public interest standards. In particular, departing customers must secure new energy resources that are not under contract to the Nevada Utilities, the departure must not burden the Nevada Utilities with increased costs or cause any remaining customers to pay increased costs and the departing customers must pay their portion of any deferred energy balances, all as determined by the PUCN. SB 547 revised Chapter 704B to establish limits on the amount of load eligible to take service under Chapter 704B and to set those limits as a part of the IRP filed by the Nevada Utilities. Also, the Utilities and the state regulatory commissions are individually evaluating how best to integrate private generation resources into their service and rate design, including considering such factors as maintaining high levels of customer safety and service reliability, minimizing adverse cost impacts and fairly allocating costs among all customers.

In Nevada, large natural gas customers using 12,000 therms per month with fuel switching capability are allowed to participate in the incentive natural gas rate tariff. Once a service agreement has been executed, a customer can compare natural gas prices under this tariff to alternative energy sources and choose its source of natural gas. In addition, natural gas customers using greater than 1,000 therms per day have the ability to secure their own natural gas supplies under the gas transportation tariff.

37


PacifiCorp

Rate Filings

Under Utah law, the UPSC must issue a written order within 240 days of a public utility's application for a general rate change. Absent an order, the proposed rates go into effect as filed and are not subject to refund, the UPSC may allow interim rates to take effect within 45 days of an application, subject to refund or surcharge, if an adequate prima facie showing is established in hearing that the interim rate change is justified.

In Oregon, the OPUC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates for a period not to exceed more than six months, with an additional three-month extension, beyond the 30-day time period when the new rates would otherwise go into effect. Absent suspension or other action from the OPUC, new rates automatically go into effect 30 days from filing by the utility. Upon suspension by the OPUC, the OPUC is authorized to allow the collection of an interim rate, subject to refund, during the pendency of the OPUC's review of the rate request.

In Wyoming, the WPSC can allow interim rates to go into effect 30 days after the initial application but may require a bond to secure a refund for the amount. The WPSC may suspend the rates for final approval for a period not to exceed 10 months.

In Washington, the WUTC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed 10 months beyond the 30-day time period when the new rate would otherwise go into effect.
Under Idaho law, the IPUC can suspend a filing for an initial period not to exceed five months and an additional extension of 60 days with a showing of good cause.

In California, the CPUC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed 18 months. The CPUC may extend the suspension period on a case-by-case basis.

Adjustment Mechanisms

In addition to recovery through base rates, PacifiCorp also achieves recovery of certain costs through various adjustment mechanisms as summarized below.
State RegulatorBase Rate Test PeriodAdjustment Mechanism
UPSC
Forecasted or historical with known and measurable changes(1)
EBA under which 100% of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. Wheeling revenue is also included in the mechanism. Beginning in 2021, the mechanism includes a true-up of PTCs at 100%.
Balancing account to provide for 100% recovery or refund of the difference between the level of REC revenues included in base rates and actual REC revenues after adjusting for a REC incentive authorized by the UPSC.
Recovery mechanism for single capital investments that in total exceed 1% of existing rate base when a general rate case has occurred within the preceding 18 months.
Effective January 1, 2021, Wildland Fire Mitigation Balancing Account to recover operating expenses and capital expenditures incurred to implement PacifiCorp's Utah Wildland Fire Protection Plan incremental to those included in base rates.
OPUCForecastedPCAM under which 90% of the difference between forecasted net variable power costs and PTCs established under the annual TAM and actual net variable power costs and PTCs is deferred and reflected in future rates. The difference between the forecasted and actual net variable power costs and PTCs must fall outside of an established asymmetrical deadband, with a negative annual power cost variance deadband of $15 million; and a positive annual power cost variance deadband of $30 million and is subject to an earnings test of +/- 1% on PacifiCorp's allowed return on equity.
Annual TAM based on forecasted net variable power costs and PTCs.
RAC to recover the revenue requirement of new renewable resources and associated transmission costs that are not reflected in general rates.
Balancing account for recovery of costs associated with the purchase of RECs necessary to meet Oregon's RPS requirements.
Effective January 1, 2021, Annual Wildfire Mitigation and Vegetation Management Cost Recovery Mechanism approved through 2024 to recover vegetation management and wildfire mitigation operations and maintenance costs and wildfire mitigation capital costs, incremental to those included in base rates. Recovery is subject to performance metrics and earnings tests. After 2024, the mechanism will be assessed to determine whether continued use is warranted.
38


WPSC
Forecasted or historical with known and measurable changes(1)
ECAM under which 80% of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. Within the mechanism, chemical costs and start-up fuel costs are also included at the 80% symmetrical sharing band and PTCs are included at 100% symmetrical sharing.
REC and SO2 revenue adjustment mechanism to provide for recovery or refund of 100% of any difference between actual REC and SO2 revenues and the level in rates.
WUTCHistorical with known and measurable changesPCAM under which the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates after applying a $4 million deadband for positive or negative net power cost variances. For net power cost variances between $4 million and $10 million, amounts to be recovered from customers are allocated 50/50 and amounts to be credited to customers are allocated 75/25 (customers/PacifiCorp). Positive or negative net power cost variances in excess of $10 million are allocated 90/10 (customers/PacifiCorp). Beginning in 2021, the mechanism includes a true-up of PTCs at 100%.
Deferral mechanism of costs for up to 24 months of new base load generation resources and eligible renewable resources and related transmission that qualify under the state's emissions performance standard and are not reflected in base rates.
REC revenue tracking mechanism to provide credit of 100% of REC revenues to customers.
Decoupling mechanism under which the difference between actual annual revenues and authorized revenues per customer per specified rate schedules is deferred and reflected in future rates, subject to an earnings test. Under the earnings test, 50% of any proportional excess earnings over PacifiCorp's authorized return on equity is returned to customers in addition to any surcharge or surcredit related to the revenue variance. The earnings test is asymmetrical, and adjustments are not made when PacifiCorp earns at or below authorized returns on equity. To trigger a rate adjustment, the deferral balance must exceed plus or minus 2.5% of the authorized revenue at the end of each deferral period by rate class. Rate adjustments must not exceed a surcharge of 5% of the actual normalized revenue by class.
IPUCHistorical with known and measurable changesECAM under which 90% of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. Also provides for recovery or refund of 100% of the difference between the level of REC revenues included in base rates and actual REC revenues and differences in actual PTCs compared to the amount in base rates.
CPUCForecastedPTAM for major capital additions that allows for rate adjustments outside of the context of a traditional general rate case for the revenue requirement associated with capital additions exceeding $50 million on a total-company basis. Filed as eligible capital additions are placed into service.
ECAC that allows for an annual update to actual and forecasted net power costs.
PTAM for attrition, a mechanism that allows for an annual adjustment to costs other than net power costs.
Catastrophic Events Memorandum Account for catastrophic events, allows for deferral and cost recovery of reasonable costs incurred as the result of catastrophic events, which are events for which a state or federal agency has declared a state of emergency.
Fire Risk Mitigation Memorandum Account to track costs related to wildfire mitigation activities incremental to what is in base rates and Wildfire Mitigation Plan Memorandum Account to track costs associated with the implementation of PacifiCorp's approved wildfire mitigation plan.

(1)PacifiCorp has relied on both historical test periods with known and measurable adjustments, as well as forecasted test periods.

MidAmerican Energy

Rate Filings

Under Iowa law, a utility may implement temporary rates, without IUB review and subject to refund, on or after 10 days of filing a request for higher base rates. If the IUB has not issued a final order within 10 months after the filing date, the temporary rates become final. Under Illinois law, new base rates may become effective 45 days after the filing of a request with the ICC, or earlier with ICC approval. The ICC has authority to suspend the proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed approximately 11 months after filing. South Dakota law authorizes the SDPUC to suspend new base rates for up to six months during the pendency of rate proceedings; however, a utility may implement all or a portion of the proposed new rates six months after the filing of a request for a rate increase subject to refund pending a final order in the proceeding.

39


Iowa law also permits rate-regulated utilities to seek ratemaking principles with the IUB prior to the construction of certain types of new generating facilities. Pursuant to this law, MidAmerican Energy has applied for and obtained IUB ratemaking principles orders for a 484-MW (MidAmerican Energy's share) coal-fueled generating facility, a 495-MW combined cycle natural gas-fueled generating facility and 6,639 MWs (nominal ratings) of wind-powered generating facilities as of December 31, 2022. These ratemaking principles established cost caps for the projects, below which such costs are deemed prudent by the IUB and authorized a fixed rate of return on equity for the respective generating facilities over the regulatory life of the facilities in any future Iowa rate proceeding. As of December 31, 2022, the generating facilities in-service totaled $7.6 billion, or 36%, of MidAmerican Energy's regulated property, plant and equipment, net and were subject to these ratemaking principles at a weighted average return on equity of 11.4% with a weighted average remaining life of 32 years.

Ratemaking principles for several wind-powered generation projects have established mechanisms in Iowa where electric rate base may be reduced. The current revenue sharing mechanism is in accordance with Wind XII ratemaking principles and reduces rate base for Iowa electric returns on equity exceeding an established benchmark. Sharing is triggered by MidAmerican Energy's actual equity return being above a threshold calculated annually. The threshold, not to exceed 11%, is the weighted average equity return of rate base with returns authorized via ratemaking principles proceedings and all other rate base. For all other rate base, the return is based on interest rates on 30-year A-rated utility bond yields plus 400 basis points, with a minimum return of 9.5%. MidAmerican Energy shares with customers 90% of the revenue in excess of the trigger. A second mechanism, the retail customer benefit mechanism, reduces electric rate base for the value of higher cost retail energy displaced by covered wind-powered production and applies to the wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in 2016 under the Wind X project and facilities constructed under the Wind XII project approved by the IUB in 2018. Rate base reductions under these mechanisms are applied to coal and other generation facilities in specified orders.

Adjustment Mechanisms

Under its current Iowa, Illinois and South Dakota electric tariffs, MidAmerican Energy is allowed to recover fluctuations in electric energy costs for its retail electric sales through fuel, or energy, cost adjustment mechanisms. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has transmission adjustment clauses to recover certain transmission charges related to retail customers in all jurisdictions. The transmission adjustment mechanisms recover costs billed by the MISO for regional transmission service. The Illinois adjustment mechanism additionally recovers MidAmerican Energy's entire transmission revenue requirement attributable to Illinois. The adjustment mechanisms reduce the regulatory lag for the recovery of energy and transmission costs related to retail electric customers in these jurisdictions and accomplish, with limited timing differences, a pass-through of the related costs to these customers. Recoveries through these adjustment mechanisms are reflected in operating revenue, and the related costs are reflected in cost of fuel and energy or operations and maintenance expense, as applicable.

Of the wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service as of December 31, 2022, 5,022 MWs (nominal ratings) have not been included in the determination of MidAmerican Energy's Iowa retail electric base rates. In accordance with related ratemaking principles, until such time as these generation assets are reflected in base rates and ceasing thereafter, MidAmerican Energy will continue to reduce its revenue from Iowa EAC recoveries by $12 million each calendar year.

MidAmerican Energy's cost of natural gas purchased for resale is collected for each jurisdiction through a uniform PGA, which is updated monthly to reflect changes in actual costs. Subject to prudence reviews, the PGA accomplishes a pass-through of MidAmerican Energy's cost of natural gas purchased for resale to its customers and, accordingly, has no direct effect on net income.

MidAmerican Energy's electric and natural gas energy efficiency program costs are collected through bill riders that are adjusted annually based on actual and expected costs in accordance with the energy efficiency plans filed with and approved by the respective state regulatory commission. As such, the energy efficiency program costs, which are reflected in operations and maintenance expense, and related recoveries, which are reflected in operating revenue, have no direct impact on net income.

40


MidAmerican Energy has income tax rider mechanisms in Iowa and Illinois that were established in response to 2017 Tax Reform, which enacted significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, including, among other things, a reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. South Dakota implemented changes to base rates in response to 2017 Tax Reform. As a result of 2017 Tax Reform, MidAmerican Energy re-measured its accumulated deferred income tax balances at the 21% rate and increased regulatory liabilities pursuant to the approved mechanisms. In December 2018, the IUB approved in final form a tax expense revision mechanism that reduces customer electric rates for the impact of the lower income tax rate on current operations, as calculated annually, and defers the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes created by their re-measurement at the 21% income tax rate to a regulatory liability, the disposition of which will be determined in MidAmerican Energy's next rate case. In 2018, Iowa Senate File 2417 was signed into law, which, among other items, reduced the state of Iowa corporate tax rate from 12% to 9.8% effective in 2021, at which time, the impacts of Iowa Senate File 2417 began to be included in the Iowa tax expense revision mechanism.

NV Energy (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific)

Rate Filings

Nevada statutes require the Nevada Utilities to file electric general rate cases once every three years with the PUCN. Sierra Pacific may also file natural gas general rate cases with the PUCN. The Nevada Utilities are also subject to a two-part fuel and purchased power adjustment mechanism. The Nevada Utilities make quarterly filings to reset the BTERs, based on the last 12 months of fuel and purchased power costs. The difference between actual fuel and purchased power costs and the revenue collected in the BTERs is deferred into a balancing account. The DEAA rate clears amounts deferred into the balancing account. Nevada regulations allow an electric or natural gas utility that adjusts its BTERs on a quarterly basis to request PUCN approval to make quarterly changes to its DEAA rate if the request is in the public interest. During required annual DEAA proceedings, the prudence of fuel and purchased power costs is reviewed, and if any costs are disallowed on such grounds, the disallowances will be incorporated into the next quarterly BTERs change. Also, on an annual basis, the Nevada Utilities (a) seek a determination that energy efficiency program expenditures were reasonable, (b) request that the PUCN reset base and amortization EEPR, and (c) request that the PUCN reset base and amortization EEIR.

            EEPR and EEIR

EEPR was established to allow the Nevada Utilities to recover the costs of implementing energy efficiency programs and EEIR was established to offset the negative impacts on revenue associated with the successful implementation of energy efficiency programs. These rates change once a year in the utility's annual DEAA application based on energy efficiency program budgets prepared by the Nevada Utilities and approved by the PUCN in the IRP proceedings. When the Nevada Utilities' regulatory earned rate of return for a calendar year exceeds the regulatory rate of return used to set base tariff general rates, they are obligated to refund energy efficiency implementation revenue previously collected for that year.

            Net Metering

Nevada enacted Assembly Bill 405 ("AB 405") on June 15, 2017. The legislation, among other things, established net metering crediting rates for private generation customers with installed net metering systems less than 25 kilowatts. Under AB 405, private generation customers will be compensated for excess energy on a monthly basis at 95% of the rate the customer would have paid for a kilowatt-hour of electricity supplied by the Nevada Utilities for the first 80 MWs of cumulative installed capacity of all net metering systems in Nevada, 88% of the rate for the next 80 MWs, 81% of the rate for the next 80 MWs and 75% of the rate for any additional private generation capacity. As of December 31, 2022, the cumulative installed and applied-for capacity of net metering systems under AB 405 in Nevada was 583 MWs.

            Natural Disaster Protection Plan ("NDPP")

SB 329, Natural Disaster Mitigation Measures, was signed into law on May 22, 2019. The legislation requires the Nevada Utilities to submit a NDPP to the PUCN. The PUCN adopted NDPP regulations on January 29, 2020, that require the Nevada Utilities to file their NDPP for approval on or before March 1 of every third year. The regulations also require annual updates to be filed on or before September 1 of the second and third years of the plan. The plan must include procedures, protocols and other certain information as it relates to the efforts of the Nevada Utilities to prevent or respond to a fire or other natural disaster. The expenditures incurred by the Nevada Utilities in developing and implementing the NDPP are required to be held in a regulatory asset account, with the Nevada Utilities filing an application for recovery on or before March 1 of each year. The PUCN reopened its investigation and rulemaking on SB 329 and the comment period for the reopened investigation ended in early February 2021. Final regulations are pending.

41


Federal Regulation

The FERC is an independent agency with broad authority to implement provisions of the Federal Power Act, the Natural Gas Act ("NGA"), the Energy Policy Act whileof 2005 ("Energy Policy Act") and other federal statutes. The FERC regulates rates for wholesale sales of electricity; transmission of electricity, including pricing and regional planning for the Imperial Valleyexpansion of transmission systems; electric system reliability; utility holding companies; accounting and Wailuku independent power projects are currently certified as Qualifying Facilities ("QF")records retention; securities issuances; construction and operation of hydroelectric facilities; and other matters. The FERC also has the enforcement authority to assess civil penalties of up to $1.5 million per day per violation of rules, regulations and orders issued under the Public Utility Regulatory PoliciesFederal Power Act. The Utilities have implemented programs and procedures that facilitate and monitor compliance with the FERC's regulations described below. MidAmerican Energy is also subject to regulation by the NRC pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1978. Both EWGs1954, as amended ("Atomic Energy Act"), with respect to its ownership interest in the Quad Cities Station.

Wholesale Electricity and QFsCapacity

The FERC regulates the Utilities' rates charged to wholesale customers for electricityand transmission capacity and related services. Much of the Utilities' wholesale electricity sales and purchases occur under market-based pricing allowed by the FERC and are generally exempttherefore subject to market volatility. The Utilities are precluded from compliance with extensive federalselling at market-based rates in the PacifiCorp-East, PacifiCorp-West, Nevada Utilities, Idaho Power Company and state regulations that control the financial structure of an electric generating plantNorthWestern Energy balancing authority areas. Wholesale electricity sales in those specific balancing authority areas are permitted at cost-based rates. PacifiCorp and the prices and termsNevada Utilities have been granted the authority to bid into the California EIM at which electricity may be sold by the facilities.market-based rates.


The Yuma, Cordova, Saranac, Imperial Valley, Topaz, Agua Caliente, Solar Star, Bishop Hill II, Marshall, Grande Prairie and Pinyon Pines independent power projects have obtained authority from the FERC to sell their power using market-based rates. ThisUtilities' authority to sell electricity in wholesale electricity markets at market-based rates is subject to triennial reviews conducted by the FERC. Accordingly, the respective independent power projectsUtilities are required to submit triennial filings to the FERC that demonstrate a lack of market power over sales of wholesale electricity and electric generation capacity in their respective market areas. The Pinyon Pines, Solar Star, TopazPacifiCorp, the Nevada Utilities and Yuma independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLCcertain affiliates, representing the BHE Northwest Companies, file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Southwest Region.purposes. The BHE Northwest Companies' most recent triennial filing for the Southwest Region was made in June 20162022 and an order accepting it was issued December 2016. The Cordova and Saranac independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together withis under review by the FERC. MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Northeast Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Northeast Region was made in June 20172020 and an order accepting it was issued in January 2018. The Bishop Hill II independent power project and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together withDecember 2020. MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Central Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Central Region was made in December 20172020 and an order accepting it was issued in March 2022. Under the FERC's market-based rules, the Utilities must also file with the FERC a notice of change in status when there is a change in the conditions that the FERC relied upon in granting market-based rate authority. MidAmerican Energy most recently filed a notice of non-material change in status in July 2022, and the filing is currently pending withunder review by the FERC.


The entire output of Jumbo Road, Alamo 6, PearlTransmission

PacifiCorp's and Power Resources is within the Electric Reliability Council of Texas ("ERCOT")Nevada Utilities' wholesale transmission services are regulated by the FERC under cost-based regulation subject to PacifiCorp's and market-based authority is not required for such sales solely within ERCOT as the ERCOT market is not a FERC-jurisdictional market. Similarly, Wailuku sells its output solely to the Hawaii Electric Company within the Hawaii electric grid which is not a FERC-jurisdictional market and Wailuku therefore does not require market-based rate authority.

EWGsNevada Utilities' OATTs. These services are permitted to sell capacity and electricity only in the wholesale markets, not to end users. Additionally, utilities are required to purchase electricity produced by QFs at a price that does not exceed the purchasing utility's "avoided cost" and to sell back-up power to the QFsoffered on a non-discriminatory basis, unless theywhich means that all potential customers are provided an equal opportunity to access the transmission system. PacifiCorp's and the Nevada Utilities' transmission business is managed and operated independently from its wholesale marketing business in accordance with the FERC's Standards of Conduct. PacifiCorp and the Nevada Utilities have successfully petitionedmade several required compliance filings in accordance with these rules.

In December 2011, PacifiCorp adopted a cost-based formula rate under its OATT for its transmission services. Cost-based formula rates are intended to be an effective means of recovering PacifiCorp's investments and associated costs of its transmission system without the need to file rate cases with the FERC, for an exemption from this purchase requirement. Avoided cost is defined generally asalthough the price at which the utility could purchase or produce the same amount of power from sources other than the QF on a long-term basis. The Energy Policy Act eliminated the purchase requirement for utilities with respect to new contracts under certain conditions. New QF contractsformula rate results are also subject to discovery and challenges by the FERC rate filing requirements, unlike QF contracts entered into priorand intervenors. A significant portion of these services are provided to PacifiCorp's energy supply management function.

MidAmerican Energy participates in the MISO as a transmission-owning member. Accordingly, the MISO is the transmission provider under its FERC-approved OATT. While the MISO is responsible for directing the operation of MidAmerican Energy's transmission system, MidAmerican Energy retains ownership of its transmission assets and, therefore, is subject to the FERC's reliability standards discussed below. MidAmerican Energy's transmission business is managed and operated independently from its wholesale marketing business in accordance with the FERC's Standards of Conduct.

42


MidAmerican Energy Policy Act. FERC regulations also permit QFsconstructed and utilitiesowns four Multi-Value Projects ("MVPs") located in Iowa and Illinois that added approximately 250 miles of 345-kV transmission line to negotiate agreementsMidAmerican Energy's transmission system since 2012. The MISO's OATT allows for utility purchasesbroad cost allocation for MidAmerican Energy's MVPs, including similar MVPs of power at rates other thanMISO participants. Accordingly, a significant portion of the utilities' avoided cost.revenue requirement associated with MidAmerican Energy's MVP investments is shared with other MISO participants based on the MISO's cost allocation methodology, and a portion of the revenue requirement of the other participants' MVPs is allocated to MidAmerican Energy, which MidAmerican Energy recovers from customers via a rider mechanism. The transmission assets and financial results of MidAmerican Energy's MVPs are excluded from the determination of its base retail electric rates.


The Philippine CongressFERC has passedestablished an extensive number of mandatory reliability standards developed by the ElectricNERC and the WECC, including planning and operations, critical infrastructure protection and regional standards. Compliance, enforcement and monitoring oversight of these standards is carried out by the FERC; the NERC; and the WECC for PacifiCorp, Nevada Power, Industry Reformand Sierra Pacific; and the Midwest Reliability Organization for MidAmerican Energy.

Hydroelectric

The FERC licenses and regulates the operation of hydroelectric systems, including license compliance and dam safety programs. Most of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities are licensed by the FERC as major systems under the Federal Power Act, and certain of 2001 ("EPIRA"), whichthese systems are licensed under the Oregon Hydroelectric Act. Under the Federal Power Act, 16 of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric developments are classified as "high hazard potential," meaning it is aimed at restructuring the Philippine power industry, privatizing the National Power Corporation and introducing a competitive electricity market, among other initiatives. The implementation of EPIRA may impact future operationsprobable in the Philippinesevent of a dam failure that loss of human life in the downstream population could occur. PacifiCorp uses the FERC's guidelines to develop public safety programs consisting of a dam safety program and the Philippine power industry as a whole, the effect of which is not yet known as changes resulting from EPIRA are ongoing.emergency action plans.


Residential Real Estate Brokerage Company

HomeServices is regulated by the United States Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection under the Truth In Lending Act ("TILA") and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"); the United States Federal Trade Commission with respect to certain franchising activities; and by state agencies where it operates. TILA primarily governs the real estate lending process by mandating lenders to fully inform borrowers about loan costs. RESPA primarily governs the real estate settlement process by mandating all parties fully inform borrowers about all closing costs, lender servicing and escrow account practices and business relationships between closing service providers and other parties to the transaction.

REGULATORY MATTERS

In addition to the discussion contained hereinFor an update regarding regulatory matters,PacifiCorp's Klamath River hydroelectric system, refer to "General Regulation"Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 18 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding the general regulatory framework.

PacifiCorp

In June 2017, PacifiCorp filed two applications each with the UPSC, IPUC and the WPSC for the Energy Vision 2020 project. The first application sought approvals to construct or procure four new Wyoming wind resources with a total capacity of 860 MWs identified as benchmark resources and certain transmission facilities. A request for proposals was issued in September 2017 seeking up to 1,270 MWs to compete against PacifiCorp's benchmark resources in the final resource selection process for the project. PacifiCorp has identified four winning wind resource bids from this solicitation totaling 1,311 MWs, consisting of 1,111 MWs owned and 200 MW as a power-purchase agreement. The combined new wind and transmission projects will cost approximately $2 billion. Hearings are expected to be set by the WPSC, UPSC, and IPUC to occur in the second quarter of 2018. The second application sought approval of PacifiCorp's resource decision to upgrade or "repower" existing wind resources, as prudent and in the public interest. PacifiCorp estimates the wind repowering project will cost approximately $1 billion. Applications filed in Utah, Idaho, and Wyoming seek approval for the proposed rate-making treatment associated with the projects. The hearings on repowering in Utah and Wyoming have been extended to provide time for supplemental analyses for updated costs and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 ("2017 Tax Reform") and are scheduled to occur in April and May 2018. On December 28, 2017, the IPUC approved an all-party stipulation for approval of the application to repower existing wind facilities and allow recovery of costs in rates through an adjustment to the annual ECAM filing.

The 2017 Tax Reform enacted significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, including, among other things, a reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. PacifiCorp has agreed to defer the impact of the tax law change with each of its state rate regulatory bodies. PacifiCorp will be proposing to reduce customer rates for a portion of the lower annual income tax expense resulting from the decrease in federal tax rates, and deferring the remainder to offset other costs as approved by the regulatory bodies. PacifiCorp cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of regulatory actions on its proposals.

Utah Mine Disposition

In December 2014, PacifiCorp filed an advice letter with the CPUC to request approval to sell certain Utah mining assets and to establish memorandum accounts to track the costs associated with the Utah Mine Disposition for future recovery. In July 2015, the CPUC Energy Division issued a letter requiring PacifiCorp to file a formal application for approval of the sale of certain Utah mining assets. Accordingly, in September 2015, PacifiCorp filed an application with the CPUC. On February 6, 2017, a joint motion was filed with the CPUC seeking approval of a settlement agreement reached by PacifiCorp and all other parties. The agreement states, among other things, that the decision to sell certain Utah mining assets is in the public interest. Parties also reserve their rights to additional testimony, briefs and hearings to the extent the CPUC determines that additional California Environmental Quality Act proceedings are necessary. A CPUC decision on the joint motion and settlement agreement is expected in 2018.

For additional information related to the accounting impacts associated with the Utah Mine Disposition, refer to Notes 5 and 9Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.



Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Utah

    General
In March 2017, PacifiCorp filed
MidAmerican Energy is subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC with respect to its annual EBAlicense and 25% ownership interest in Quad Cities Station. Constellation Energy, the operator and 75% owner of Quad Cities Station, is under contract with MidAmerican Energy to secure and keep in effect all necessary NRC licenses and authorizations.

The NRC regulates the granting of permits and licenses for the construction and operation of nuclear generating stations and regularly inspects such stations for compliance with applicable laws, regulations and license terms. Current licenses for Quad Cities Station provide for operation until December 14, 2032. The NRC review and regulatory process covers, among other things, operations, maintenance, environmental and radiological aspects of such stations. The NRC may modify, suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply with the UPSC seeking approvalAtomic Energy Act, the regulations under such Act or the terms of such licenses.

Federal regulations provide that any nuclear operating facility may be required to refundcease operation if the NRC determines there are deficiencies in state, local or utility emergency preparedness plans relating to customers $7 million in deferred net power costssuch facility, and the deficiencies are not corrected. Constellation Energy has advised MidAmerican Energy that an emergency preparedness plan for Quad Cities Station has been approved by the NRC. Constellation Energy has also advised MidAmerican Energy that state and local plans relating to Quad Cities Station have been approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The NRC also regulates the decommissioning of nuclear-powered generating facilities, including the planning and funding for the periodeventual decommissioning of the facilities. In accordance with these regulations, MidAmerican Energy submits a biennial report to the NRC providing reasonable assurance that funds will be available to pay its share of the costs of decommissioning Quad Cities Station. MidAmerican Energy has established a trust for the investment of funds collected for nuclear decommissioning of Quad Cities Station.

43


Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 ("NWPA"), the DOE is responsible for the selection and development of repositories for, and the permanent disposal of, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive wastes. Constellation Energy, as required by the NWPA, signed a contract with the DOE under which the DOE was to receive spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste for disposal beginning not later than January 1, 2016 through1998. The DOE did not begin receiving spent nuclear fuel on the scheduled date and remains unable to receive such fuel and waste. The costs to be incurred by the DOE for disposal activities were previously being financed by fees charged to owners and generators of the waste. In accordance with a 2013 ruling by the D.C. Circuit, the DOE, in May 2014, provided notice that, effective May 16, 2014, the spent nuclear fuel disposal fee would be zero. In 2004, Constellation Energy, reached a settlement with the DOE concerning the DOE's failure to begin accepting spent nuclear fuel in 1998. As a result, Quad Cities Station has been billing the DOE, and the DOE is obligated to reimburse the station for all station costs incurred due to the DOE's delay. Constellation Energy has constructed an interim spent fuel storage installation ("ISFSI") at Quad Cities Station consisting of two pads to store spent nuclear fuel in dry casks in order to free space in the storage pool. The first dry cask was placed in-service in 2005. As of December 31, 2016, reflecting2021, the difference between basefirst pad at the ISFSI is full, and actual net power coststhe second pad is in operation. The first and second pads at the ISFSI are expected to facilitate storage of casks to support operations at Quad Cities Station through the end of its operating licenses.
Nuclear Insurance

MidAmerican Energy maintains financial protection against catastrophic loss associated with its interest in Quad Cities Station through a combination of insurance purchased by Constellation Energy, insurance purchased directly by MidAmerican Energy, and the mandatory industry-wide loss funding mechanism afforded under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988 ("Price-Anderson"), which was amended and extended by the Energy Policy Act. The general types of coverage maintained are: nuclear liability, property damage or loss and nuclear worker liability, as discussed below.

Constellation Energy purchases private market nuclear liability insurance for Quad Cities Station in the 2016 deferral period.maximum available amount of $450 million, which includes coverage for MidAmerican Energy's ownership. In April 2017, PacifiCorp revisedaccordance with Price-Anderson, excess liability protection above that amount is provided by a mandatory industry-wide Secondary Financial Protection program under which the licensees of nuclear generating facilities could be assessed for liability incurred due to a serious nuclear incident at any commercial nuclear reactor in the U.S. Currently, MidAmerican Energy's aggregate maximum potential share of an assessment for Quad Cities Station is approximately $69 million per incident, payable in installments not to exceed $10 million annually.

The insurance for nuclear property damage losses covers property damage, stabilization and decontamination of the facility, disposal of the decontaminated material and premature decommissioning arising out of a covered loss. For Quad Cities Station, Constellation Energy purchases primary property insurance protection for the combined interests in Quad Cities Station, with coverage limits for nuclear damage losses up to $1.5 billion for nuclear perils and $500 million for non-nuclear perils. MidAmerican Energy also directly purchases extra expense coverage for its recommendationshare of replacement power and requested approval to refundother extra expenses in the event of a covered accidental outage at Quad Cities Station. The property and related coverages purchased directly by MidAmerican Energy and by Constellation Energy, which includes the interests of MidAmerican Energy, are underwritten by an additional $7 million to customers resulting in an interim rate reduction of $14 million. The rate change became effective on an interim basis May 1, 2017. In January 2018, the UPSC approved a stipulation that provides an additional $3 million reduction, which will be incorporated into the 2018 EBA filingindustry mutual insurance company and contain provisions for retrospective premium assessments to be made in March 2018.called upon based on the industry mutual board of directors' discretion for adverse loss experience. Currently, the maximum retrospective amounts that could be assessed against MidAmerican Energy from industry mutual policies for its obligations associated with Quad Cities Station total $8 million.


In March 2017, PacifiCorp filed its annual REC balancing account applicationThe master nuclear worker liability coverage, which is purchased by Constellation Energy for Quad Cities Station, is an industry-wide guaranteed-cost policy with the UPSC seeking to refund to customers $1an aggregate limit of $450 million for the period January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016nuclear industry as a whole, which is in effect to cover tort claims of workers in nuclear-related industries.

U.S. Mine Safety

PacifiCorp's surface mining operations are regulated by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, which administers federal mine safety and health laws and regulations, and state regulatory agencies. The Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration has the statutory authority to institute a civil action for relief, including a temporary or permanent injunction, restraining order or other appropriate order against a mine operator who fails to pay penalties or fines for violations of federal mine safety standards. Information regarding PacifiCorp's mine safety violations and other legal matters disclosed in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K.

44


Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Subsidiaries

The Pipeline Companies are regulated by the FERC, pursuant to the NGA and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. Under this authority, the FERC regulates, among other items, (a) rates, charges, terms and conditions of service, (b) the construction and operation of interstate pipelines, storage and related facilities, including the extension, expansion or abandonment of such facilities and (c) the construction and operation of LNG export/import facilities. The Pipeline Companies hold certificates of public convenience and necessity and LNG facility authorizations issued by the FERC, which authorize them to construct, operate and maintain their pipeline and related facilities and services.

In February 2022, the FERC updated its certificate policy that guides the authorization of natural gas projects and issued an interim policy providing guidance on how the FERC will review a natural gas project for its impact on climate change. The policies apply to pending and future natural gas projects. On March 24, 2022, the FERC revoked application of the policies and sought further comments.

FERC regulations and the Pipeline Companies' tariffs allow each of the Pipeline Companies to charge approved rates for the differenceservices set forth in base and actual RECs. The rate change became effective on an interim basis June 1, 2017.

Astheir respective tariffs. Generally, these rates are a resultfunction of the Utah Sustainable Transportationcost of providing services to customers, including prudently incurred operations and Energy Plan legislationmaintenance expenses, taxes, depreciation and amortization and a reasonable return on invested capital. Tariff rates for each of the Pipeline Companies have been developed under a rate design methodology whereby substantially all fixed costs, including a return on invested capital and income taxes, are collected through reservation charges, which are paid by firm transportation and storage customers regardless of volumes shipped. Commodity charges, which are paid only with respect to volumes actually shipped, are designed to recover the remaining, primarily variable, costs. Kern River's reservation rates have historically been approved using a "levelized" cost-of-service methodology so that was signed into law in March 2016, PacifiCorp filed an application in September 2016 seeking approval of a proposed five-year pilot program with an annual budget of $10 million authorized under the legislation to address clean-coal technology programs, commercial line extension programs, an electric vehicle incentive program and associated residential time of use rate pilot and other programs authorized in legislation. The UPSC issued orders approving PacifiCorp's application in phases in December 2016, May 2017, June 2017 and October 2017.

In November 2016, PacifiCorp filedremains constant over the levelization period. This levelized cost of service analyses,has been achieved by using a FERC-approved depreciation schedule in which depreciation increases as ordered by the UPSC, to quantify the cost shifting due to net metering. The UPSC ordered the analyses to comply with a 2014 law requiring the examination of whether the costs of net metering exceed the benefits to PacifiCorp and other customers. The filing includes a proposal for a new rate schedule for residential customer generators with a three-part rate based on the cost of serving this classcapital decreases on declining rate base. Each of customer, which will mitigatethe Pipeline Companies also hold authority to negotiate rates for their services, subject to requirements to offer cost-based rate alternatives, and to publish such negotiated rates.In addition, for services that are not subject to FERC rate jurisdiction pursuant to Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act, Cove Point charges rates that are established by contract.

The Pipeline Companies' rates are subject to change in future cost shifting. PacifiCorp proposedgeneral rate proceedings. Rates for natural gas pipelines are changed by filings under either Section 5 or Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act. Section 5 proceedings are initiated by the FERC or the pipeline's customers for a potential reduction to rates that the new rate schedule only apply to new net metering customers that submit applications after December 9, 2016. On December 9, 2016, PacifiCorp requestedFERC finds are no longer just and reasonable. In a Section 5 proceeding, the initiating party has the burden of demonstrating that the currently effective date for the start of a transitional tariff be suspended while it works with stakeholders on a collaborative process to resolve net metering rate design issues. The filing also requests an increase in the application fees for net metering. In February 2017, the UPSC ruled on motions to dismiss and requests for a show cause order for a regulatory rate review filed by various parties to the docket and denied the motions. On August 28, 2017, PacifiCorp filed a settlement stipulation in the net metering proceeding. The stipulation provides for the closurerates of the net metering program to new entrants on November 15, 2017, with a transition to a new program that provides a separate compensationpipeline are no longer just and reasonable, and of demonstrating alternative just and reasonable rates. Any rate for exported power. All net metering customers, including those with a submitted application, as of November 15, 2017, will be grandfathered into the current program until January 1, 2036. A new proceeding will be initiated to establish a methodology for the determination of the export credit for new customers. During this period, a transition program for new customers will commence November 15, 2017, for a limited number of customers. Beginning December 1, 2017, PacifiCorp began accepting applications for the new transition program for private generation customers. Residential and non-residential private generation customers in the transition program will be compensated for exported energy at 90% and 92.5% of the current average energy rates, respectively. The rates for the exported energy will be fixed through January 1, 2033 for these transition program customers. The new residential and non-residential transition program customers' compensation will be only available for the first 170 MW and 70 MW, respectively. The stipulation also includes an agreement to support a two-year extension on the state tax credit for residential solar installations. A hearing on the stipulation was held on September 18, 2017, and an order approving it was issued September 29, 2017.

Oregon

In March 2017, PacifiCorp submitted its filing for the annual TAM filing in Oregon requesting an annual increase of $18 million, or an average price increase of 1.5%, based on forecasted net power costs and loads for calendar year 2018. Consistent with Oregon Senate Bill 1547, the filing includes an update of the impact of expiring production tax credits, which accounts for $6 million of the total rate adjustment. In October 2017, the OPUC issued an order approving PacifiCorp's request with some minor adjustments to the NPC modeling. PacifiCorp submitted the final update in November 2017 which reflected a rate increase of $2 million, or an average price increase of 0.2%, effective January 2018.

Wyoming

In April 2017, PacifiCorp filed its annual ECAM, REC and RRA applications with the WPSC. The ECAM filing requests approval to refund to customers $5 million in deferred net power costs for the period January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016, and the RRA application requests approval to refund to customers $1 million. In June 2017, the WPSC approved the ECAM, REC and RRA rates on an interim basis. In November 2017, a stipulation was filed resolving all issues in the proceeding. The stipulation results in an additional refund to customers of $1 million in 2017. The WPSC approved the stipulation at the hearing on November 28, 2017.

Washington

In August 2017, PacifiCorp submitted a compliance filing to implement the second-year rate increase approved as part of the two-year rate plan in the 2015 regulatory rate review. The compliance filing included rates based on the $8 million, or 2.3%, increase ordered by the WUTC in September 2016. The compliance filing was approved by the WUTC on September 14, 2017, with rates effective September 15, 2017. On December 1, 2017, PacifiCorp submitted a tariff filing to implement the first price change for the decoupling mechanism approved in PacifiCorp's 2015 regulatory rate review. WUTC staff disputed PacifiCorp's interpretation of the WUTC's order for the decoupling mechanism and PacifiCorp's subsequent calculations requesting additional funds be booked for return to customers. In February 2018, the WUTC granted the staff's motions and rejected PacifiCorp's tariff revision and required that PacifiCorp re-file price changes for its decoupling mechanism.

Idaho

In January 2017, a $1 million, or 0.4%, decrease in base rates became effective as a result of a Section 5 proceeding is implemented prospectively upon the issuance of a final FERC order adopting the new just and reasonable rates. Section 4 rate proceedings are initiated by the natural gas pipeline, who must demonstrate that the new proposed rates are just and reasonable. The new rates as a result of a Section 4 proceeding are typically implemented six months after the Section 4 filing if higher than prior rates and are subject to refund upon issuance of a final order by the FERC.

The FERC-regulated natural gas companies may not grant undue preference to any customer. FERC regulations require that certain information be made public for market access, through standardized internet websites.These regulations also restrict each pipeline's marketing affiliates' access to certain non-public information that could affect price or availability of service.

Interstate natural gas pipelines are also subject to regulations administered by the Office of Pipeline Safety within the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, an agency of the DOT. Federal pipeline safety regulations are issued pursuant to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended ("NGPSA"), which establishes safety requirements in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of interstate natural gas facilities, and requires an entity that owns or operates pipeline facilities to comply with such plans. Major amendments to the NGPSA include the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 ("2002 Act"), the Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement and Safety Act of 2006 ("2006 Act"), the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 ("2011 Act") the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 ("2016 Act") and the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2020 ("2020 Act").

45


The 2002 Act established additional safety and pipeline integrity regulations for all natural gas pipelines in high-consequence areas. The 2002 Act imposed major new requirements in the areas of operator qualifications, risk analysis and integrity management. The 2002 Act mandated more frequent periodic inspection or testing of natural gas pipelines in high-consequence areas, which are locations where the potential consequences of a natural gas pipeline accident may be significant or may do considerable harm to persons or property. Pursuant to the 2002 Act, the DOT promulgated regulations that require natural gas pipeline operators to develop comprehensive integrity management programs, to identify applicable threats to natural gas pipeline segments that could impact high-consequence areas, to assess these segments and to provide ongoing mitigation and monitoring. The regulations require recurring inspections of high-consequence area segments every seven years after the initial baseline assessment.

The 2006 Act required pipeline operators to institute human factors management plans for personnel employed in pipeline control centers. DOT regulations published pursuant to the 2006 Act required development and implementation of written control room management procedures.

The 2011 Act was a response to natural gas pipeline incidents, most notably the San Bruno natural gas pipeline explosion that occurred in September 2010 in California. The 2011 Act increased the maximum allowable civil penalties for violations, directs operator assistance for Federal authorities conducting investigations and authorized the DOT to hire additional inspection and enforcement personnel. The 2011 Act also directed the DOT to study several topics, including the definition of high-consequence areas, the use of automatic shutoff valves in high-consequence areas, expansion of integrity management requirements beyond high-consequence areas and cast iron pipe replacement. The studies are complete, and a number of notices of proposed rulemaking have been issued. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ("PHMSA") issued the Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines: MAOP Reconfirmation, Expansion of Assessment Requirements and Other Related Amendments final rule in October 2019. The primary change was the expansion of the pipeline integrity assessment requirements to cover moderate-consequence areas and reconfirming maximum allowable operating pressures. Pipeline operators were required to develop procedures to address assessment requirements by July 2021 and complete 50% of the required MAOP reconfirmation actions by 2028 and the remaining by 2035. The BHE Pipeline Group has updated procedures, identified pipeline segments subject to the rule and has planned projects to complete required assessments. PHMSA sent Part 2 of the rule to the Federal Register for publishing August 4, 2022, and it was published in the Federal Register August 24, 2022. The rule initially had an effective date of May 2023, but has been extended to February 2024. The third part of the rule, the gas gathering rule, has also been issued, but has minimal impact on the BHE Pipeline Group.

The 2016 Act required the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to set federal minimum safety standards for underground natural gas storage facilities and authorized emergency order authority. In February 2020, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration issued a final rule regarding underground natural gas storage facilities that incorporates by reference the American Petroleum Institute's Recommended Practice 1171, "Functional Integrity of Natural Gas Storage in Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs and Aquifer Reservoirs," clarifies certain aspects of the mandatory nature of the standard and defines regulatory completion dates for underground storage facility risk assessments. The BHE Pipeline Group has 20 total underground natural gas storage fields at EGTS and Northern Natural Gas that fall under this regulation and is complying with the IPUCfinal rule. The BHE Pipeline Group underground storage fields have had several audits under the Final Rule with no notices of probable violations issued. Kern River, Carolina Gas and Cove Point do not have underground natural gas storage facilities.

The 2020 Act required operations to review and update net power coststheir inspection and maintenance plans to address how the plans contribute to eliminate hazardous leaks of natural gas, reduction of fugitive emissions and replacement or remediation of pipelines that are known to leak based on the material, design or past operating maintenance history. BHE Pipeline Group has completed the review and update of its inspection and maintenance plans. To assist in base ratesthis effort, Kern River participated in a non-punitive pilot inspection with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

The DOT and related state agencies routinely audit and inspect the pipeline facilities for compliance with their regulations. The Pipeline Companies conduct periodic internal audits of their facilities with more frequent reviews of those deemed higher risk. The Pipeline Companies also conduct preliminary audits in advance of agency audits. Compliance issues that arise during these audits or during the normal course of business are addressed on a prior rate plan stipulation.

In March 2017, PacifiCorp filed its annual ECAM applicationtimely basis. The Pipeline Companies believe their pipeline systems comply in all material respects with the IPUC requesting recoveryNGPSA and with DOT regulations issued pursuant to the NGPSA.

46


Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, as holders of $8 million for deferred costs in 2016. This filing includes recoveryelectricity distribution licenses, are subject to regulation by GEMA. GEMA regulates distribution network operators ("DNOs") within the terms of the differenceElectricity Act 1989 and the terms of DNO licenses, which are revocable with 25 years notice. Under the Electricity Act 1989, GEMA has a duty to ensure that DNOs can finance their regulated activities and DNOs have a duty to maintain an investment grade credit rating. GEMA discharges certain of its duties through its staff within Ofgem. Each of fourteen licensed DNOs distributes electricity from the national grid transmission system and distribution-connected generators to end users within its respective distribution services area.

DNOs are subject to price controls, enforced by Ofgem, that limit the revenue that may be recovered and retained from their electricity distribution activities. The regulatory regime that has been applied to electricity distributors in actual net power costsGreat Britain encourages companies to look for efficiency gains in order to improve profits. The distribution price control formula also adjusts the revenue received by DNOs to reflect a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the base level in rates, an adderrate of inflation (as measured by the United Kingdom's Retail Prices Index) and the quality of service delivered by the licensee's distribution system. The next price control, Electricity Distribution 2 ("ED2"), will be set for recoverya period of five years, starting April 1, 2023, although the formula has been, and may be, reviewed by the regulator following public consultation. The procedure and methodology adopted at a price control review are at the reasonable discretion of Ofgem. Ofgem's judgment of the Lake Side 2 resource, recoveryfuture allowed revenue of Deer Creek longwall mine investmentlicensees is likely to take into account, among other things:
the actual operating and changescapital costs of each of the licensees;
the operating and capital costs that each of the licensees would incur if it were as efficient as, in production tax credits and renewable energy credits. The IPUC approvedOfgem's judgment, the ECAM application with rates effective June 1, 2017.more efficient licensees;

the actual value of certain costs which are judged to be beyond the control of the licensees;
Californiathe taxes that each licensee is expected to pay;

In April 2017, PacifiCorp filed an application with the CPUC for an overall rate increase of 1.3%regulatory value ascribed to recover $3 million of costs recordedthe expenditures that have been incurred in the catastrophic events memorandum account over a two-yearpast and the efficient expenditures that are to be incurred in the forthcoming regulatory period;
the rate of return to be allowed on expenditures that make up the regulatory asset value;
the financial ratios of each of the licensees and the license requirement for each licensee to maintain investment grade status;
an allowance in respect of the repair of the pension deficits in the defined benefit pension schemes sponsored by each of the licensees; and
any under- or over-recoveries of revenues, relative to allowed revenues, in the previous price control period.

A number of incentive schemes also operate within the current price control period to encourage DNOs to provide an appropriate quality of service to end users. This includes specified payments to be made for failures to meet prescribed standards of service. The aggregate of these guaranteed standards payments is uncapped but may be excused in certain prescribed circumstances that are generally beyond the control of the DNOs.

The current electricity distribution price control became effective April 1, 2018.2015 and is due to terminate on March 31, 2023, and will be immediately replaced with a new price control. Although it has been the convention in Great Britain for regulators to conduct periodic regulatory reviews before making proposals for any changes to the price controls, a new price control can be implemented by GEMA without the consent of the DNOs. If a licensee disagrees with a change to its license, it can appeal the matter to the United Kingdom's CMA, as can certain other parties. Any appeals must be notified within 20 working days of the license modification by GEMA. If the CMA determines that the appellant has relevant standing, then the statute requires that the CMA complete its process within six months, or in some exceptional circumstances seven months. The catastrophic events memorandum account includesNorthern Powergrid Distribution Companies appealed Ofgem's proposals for the resetting of the formula that commenced April 1, 2015, as did one other party, and the CMA subsequently revised GEMA's decision.

The current price control was the first to be set for electricity distribution in Great Britain since Ofgem completed its review of network regulation (known as the RPI-X @ 20 project). The key changes to the price control calculations, compared to those used in previous price controls are that:
the period over which new regulatory assets are depreciated is being gradually lengthened, from 20 years to 45 years, with the change being phased over eight years;
47


allowed revenues will be adjusted during the price control period, rather than at the next price control review, to partially reflect cost variances relative to cost allowances;
the allowed cost of debt will be updated within the price control period by reference to a long-run trailing average based on external benchmarks of utility debt costs;
allowed revenues will be adjusted in relation to some new service standard incentives, principally relating to speed and service standards for new connections to the network; and
there was scope for a mid-period review and adjustment to revenues in the latter half of the period for any changes in the outputs required of licensees for certain specified reasons, although GEMA made no adjustments under this provision.

Under the current price control, as revised by the CMA, and excluding the effects of incentive schemes and any deferred revenues from the prior price control, the opening base allowed revenue of Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc remains constant in all subsequent years within the price control period (ED1) through 2022-23, before the addition of inflation. Nominal opening base allowed revenues will increase in line with inflation. Adjustments are made annually to recognize the effect of factors such as changes in the allowed cost of debt, performance on incentive schemes and catch up of prior year under- or over- recoveries.

Ofgem has completed the price control review that will result in a new price control effective April 1, 2023. The license modifications that give effect to the price control were published by Ofgem on February 3, 2023 and may be subject to appeal to the CMA if an appeal is filed by March 3, 2023. Many aspects of the current price control were maintained and the changes made generally follow the template that was set by the price controls implemented in April 2021 for transmission and gas distribution in Great Britain. Specific changes include new service standard incentives and mechanisms to adjust cost allowances in specific circumstances, particularly related to investment required to support decarbonization efforts, and partially updating the allowed return on equity within the period for changes in the interest rate on government bonds. Ofgem's final determinations also included an allowed cost of equity of 5.23% plus inflation (calculated using the United Kingdom's consumer prices index including owner occupiers' housing costs) and cost allowances representing a 20% real-term increase compared to the current regulatory period annual average. The base allowed revenue, excluding the effects of incentive schemes, pass-through costs and any deferred revenues from the prior price control, will decrease approximately 4.0% at Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and will increase approximately 2.5% at Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc, respectively, in 2023-24 before the addition of inflation.

Ofgem also monitors DNO compliance with license conditions and enforces the remedies resulting from any breach of condition. License conditions include the prices and terms of service, financial strength of the DNO, the provision of information to Ofgem and the public, as well as maintaining transparency, non-discrimination and avoidance of cross-subsidy in the provision of such services. Ofgem also monitors and enforces certain duties of a DNO set out in the Electricity Act 1989, including the duty to develop and maintain an efficient, coordinated and economical system of electricity distribution. Under changes to the Electricity Act 1989 introduced by the Utilities Act 2000, GEMA is able to impose financial penalties on DNOs that contravene any of their license duties or certain of their duties under the Electricity Act 1989, as amended, or that are failing to achieve a satisfactory performance in relation to the individual standards prescribed by GEMA. Any penalty imposed must be reasonable and may not exceed 10% of the licensee's revenue.

AltaLink

AltaLink is regulated by the AUC, pursuant to the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), the Public Utilities Act (Alberta), the Alberta Utilities Commission Act (Alberta) and the Hydro and Electric Energy Act (Alberta). The AUC is an independent, quasi-judicial agency established by the province of Alberta, Canada, which is responsible for, implementing drought-related fire hazard mitigation measuresamong other things, approving the tariffs of transmission facility owners, including AltaLink, and storm damagedistribution utilities, acquisitions of such transmission facility owners or utilities, and recovery effortsconstruction and operation of new transmission projects in Alberta. The AUC also investigates and rules on regulated rate disputes and system access problems. The AUC regulates and oversees Alberta's electricity transmission sector with broad authority that may impact many of AltaLink's activities, including its tariffs, rates, construction, operations and financing.

48


The AUC has various core functions in regulating the Alberta electricity transmission sector, including the following:
regulating and adjudicating issues related to the operation of electric utilities within Alberta;
processing and approving general tariff applications relating to revenue requirements, capital expenditure prudency and rates of return including deemed capital structure for regulated utilities while ensuring that utility rates are just and reasonable, and approval of the transmission tariff rates of regulated transmission providers paid by the AESO, which is the independent transmission system operator in Alberta, Canada that controls the operation of AltaLink's transmission system;
approving the need for new electricity transmission facilities and permits to build and licenses to operate electricity transmission facilities;
reviewing operations and accounts from electric utilities and conducting on-site inspections to ensure compliance with industry regulation and standards;
adjudicating enforcement issues including the imposition of administrative penalties that arise when market participants violate the rules of the AESO; and
collecting, storing, analyzing, appraising and disseminating information to effectively fulfill its duties as an industry regulator.

In addition, AUC approval is required in connection with new energy and regulated utility initiatives in Alberta, amendments to existing approvals and financing proposals by designated utilities.

AltaLink's tariffs are regulated by the AUC under the provisions of the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) in respect of rates and terms and conditions of service. The Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) and related regulations require the AUC to consider that it is in the public interest to provide consumers the benefit of unconstrained transmission access to competitive generation and the wholesale electricity market. In regulating transmission tariffs, the AUC must facilitate sufficient investment to ensure the timely upgrade, enhancement or expansion of transmission facilities, and foster a stable investment climate and a continued stream of capital investment for the transmission system.

Under the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), AltaLink prepares and files applications with the AUC for approval of tariffs to be paid by the AESO for the use of its transmission facilities, and the terms and conditions governing the use of those facilities. The AUC reviews and approves such tariff applications based on a cost-of-service regulatory model under a forward test year basis. Under this model, the AUC provides AltaLink with a reasonable opportunity to (i) earn a fair return on equity; and (ii) recover its forecast costs, including operating expenses, depreciation, borrowing costs and taxes (including deemed income taxes) associated with its regulated transmission business. The AUC must approve tariffs that are just, reasonable and not unduly preferential, arbitrary or unjustly discriminatory. AltaLink's transmission tariffs are not dependent on the December 2016price or volume of electricity transported through its transmission system.

The AESO is an independent system operator in Alberta, Canada that oversees the Alberta Interconnected Electric System ("AIES") and January 2017 winter storms.wholesale electricity market. The CPUC issuedAESO is responsible for directing the safe, reliable and economic operation of the AIES, including long-term transmission system planning. AltaLink and the other transmission facility owners receive substantially all of their transmission tariff revenues from the AESO. The AESO, in turn, charges wholesale tariffs, approved by the AUC, in a manner that promotes fair and open access to the AIES and facilitates a competitive market for the purchase and sale of electricity. The AESO monitors compliance with approved reliability standards, which are enforced by the Market Surveillance Administrator, which may impose penalties on transmission facility owners for non-compliance with the approved reliability standards.

The AESO determines the need and plans for the expansion and enhancement of the transmission system in Alberta in accordance with applicable law and reliability standards. The AESO's responsibilities include long-term transmission planning and management, including assessing the current and future transmission system capacity needs of market participants. When the AESO determines an order in February 2018 approving this request.

In August 2017, PacifiCorp filedexpansion or enhancement of the transmission system is needed, with limited exceptions, it submits an application to the AUC for approval of the proposed expansion or enhancement. The AESO then determines which transmission provider should submit an application to the AUC for a rate decrease of $1 million,permit and license to construct and operate the designated transmission facilities. Generally, the transmission provider operating in the geographic area where the transmission facilities expansion or 1.1%, through its annual ECAC. The CPUC issued an order approving PacifiCorp's request in December 2017,enhancement is to be located is selected by the rate decrease was effective January 2018.AESO to build, own and operate the transmission facilities. In addition, Alberta law provides that certain transmission projects may be subject to a competitive process open to qualified bidders.


49


MidAmerican Energy


MidAmerican Energy, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is a U.S. regulated electric and natural gas utility company headquartered in Iowa that serves 0.8 million retail electric customers in portions of Iowa, Illinois and South Dakota and 0.8 million retail and transportation natural gas customers in portions of Iowa, South Dakota, Illinois and Nebraska. MidAmerican Energy is principally engaged in the business of generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electricity and in distributing, selling and transporting natural gas. MidAmerican Energy's service territory covers approximately 11,000 square miles. MidAmerican Energy has a diverse customer base consisting of urban and rural residential customers and a variety of commercial and industrial customers. Principal industries served by MidAmerican Energy include electronic data storage; processing and sales of food products; manufacturing, processing and fabrication of primary metals, farm and other non-electrical machinery; cement and gypsum products; and government. In addition to retail sales and natural gas transportation, MidAmerican Energy sells electricity principally to markets operated by RTOs and natural gas to other utilities and market participants on a wholesale basis. MidAmerican Energy is a transmission-owning member of the MISO and participates in its capacity, energy and ancillary services markets.

MidAmerican Energy's regulated electric and natural gas operations are conducted under numerous franchise agreements, certificates, permits and licenses obtained from federal, state and local authorities. The franchise agreements, with various expiration dates, are typically for 20- to 25-year terms. Several of these franchise agreements give either party the right to seek amendment to the franchise agreement at one or two specified times during the term. MidAmerican Energy generally has an exclusive right to serve electric customers within its service territories and, in turn, has an obligation to provide electricity service to those customers. In return, the state utility commissions have established rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow MidAmerican Energy an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its investment. In Illinois, MidAmerican Energy's regulated retail electric customers may choose their energy supplier.

MidAmerican Energy's operating revenue and operating income derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 were as follows (dollars in millions):

202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$2,988 74 %$2,529 71 %$2,139 79 %
Regulated gas1,030 26 1,003 28 573 21 
Other— 15 — 
Total operating revenue$4,025 100 %$3,547 100 %$2,720 100 %
Operating income:
Regulated electric$372 85 %$358 86 %$384 86 %
Regulated gas66 15 58 14 64 14 
Total operating income$438 100 %$416 100 %$448 100 %

MidAmerican Energy was incorporated under the laws of the state of Iowa in 1995 and its principal executive offices are located at 666 Grand Avenue, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580, its telephone number is (515) 242-4300 and its internet address is www.midamericanenergy.com.

11


Regulated Electric Operations

Customers

The GWhs and percentages of electricity sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail customers by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Iowa27,024 92 %25,909 92 %24,425 92 %
Illinois1,970 1,895 1,847 
South Dakota296 270 251 
29,290 100 %28,074 100 %26,523 100 %

Electricity sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
GWhs sold:
Residential7,006 15 %6,718 15 %6,687 18 %
Commercial4,017 3,841 3,707 10 
Industrial16,646 35 15,944 36 14,645 39 
Other1,621 1,571 1,484 
Total retail29,290 62 28,074 64 26,523 71 
Wholesale17,964 38 16,011 36 11,219 29 
Total GWhs sold47,254 100 %44,085 100 %37,742 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential697 86 %690 86 %682 86 %
Commercial99 12 98 12 97 12 
Industrial— — — 
Other15 14 14 
Total813 100 %804 100 %795 100 %

Variations in weather, economic conditions and various conservation and energy efficiency measures and programs can impact customer energy requirements. Wholesale sales are primarily impacted by market prices for energy.

There are seasonal variations in MidAmerican Energy's electricity sales that are principally related to weather and the related use of electricity for air conditioning. Additionally, electricity sales are priced higher in the summer months compared to the remaining months of the year. As a result, 40% to 50% of MidAmerican Energy's regulated electric retail revenue is reported in the months of June, July, 2014,August and September.

A degree of concentration of sales exists with certain large electric retail customers. Sales to the 10 largest customers, from a variety of industries, comprised 25%, 24% and 23% of total retail electric sales in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sales to electronic data storage customers included in the 10 largest customers comprised 18%, 16% and 16% of total retail electric sales in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

The annual hourly peak demand on MidAmerican Energy's electric system usually occurs as a result of air conditioning use during the cooling season. Peak demand represents the highest demand on a given day and at a given hour. On August 2, 2022, retail customer usage of electricity caused a new record hourly peak demand of 5,386 MWs on MidAmerican Energy's electric distribution system, which is 150 MWs greater than the previous record hourly peak demand of 5,236 MWs set June 17, 2021.

12


Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply

MidAmerican Energy has ownership interest in a diverse portfolio of generating facilities. The following table presents certain information regarding MidAmerican Energy's owned generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:
FacilityNet
Year Installed /Net CapacityOwned Capacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy Source
Repowered(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
WIND:
Ida GroveIda Grove, IAWind2016-2019500 500 
OrientGreenfield, IAWind2018-2019500 500 
HighlandPrimghar, IAWind2015475 475 
Rolling HillsMassena, IAWind2011 / 2022443 443 
Beaver CreekOgden, IAWind2017-2018340 340 
North EnglishMontezuma, IAWind2018-2019340 340 
Palo AltoPalo Alto, IAWind2019-2020340 340 
Arbor HillGreenfield, IAWind2018-2020316 316 
PomeroyPomeroy, IAWind2007-2011 / 2018-2019, 2021286 286 
Diamond TrailLadora, IAWind2020250 250 
LundgrenOtho, IAWind2014250 250 
O'BrienPrimghar, IAWind2016250 250 
Southern HillsOrient, IAWind2020-2021250 250 
CenturyBlairsburg, IAWind2005-2008 / 2017-2018200 200 
EclipseAdair, IAWind2012 / 2022200 200 
PlymouthRemsen, IAWind2021200 200 
IntrepidSchaller, IAWind2004-2005 / 2017176 176 
AdairAdair, IAWind2008 / 2019-2020175 175 
PrairieMontezuma, IAWind2017-2018169 169 
CarrollCarroll, IAWind2008 / 2019150 150 
WalnutWalnut, IAWind2008 / 2019150 150 
ViennaGladbrook, IAWind2012-2013150 150 
AdamsLennox, IAWind2015150 150 
WellsburgWellsburg, IAWind2014139 139 
LaurelLaurel, IAWind2011 / 2022120 120 
MacksburgMacksburg, IAWind2014119 119 
ContrailBraddyville, IAWind2020110 110 
Morning LightAdair, IAWind2012 / 2022100 100 
VictoryWestside, IAWind2006 / 2017-201899 99 
IvesterWellsburg, IAWind201890 90 
Pocahontas PrairiePomeroy, IAWind2020 / 202180 80 
Charles CityCharles City, IAWind2008 / 201875 75 
7,192 7,192 
COAL:
LouisaMuscatine, IACoal1983747 657 
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 3Council Bluffs, IACoal1978702 555 
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 4Council Bluffs, IACoal2007806 481 
OttumwaOttumwa, IACoal1981706 367 
George Neal Unit No. 3Sergeant Bluff, IACoal1975504 363 
George Neal Unit No. 4Salix, IACoal1979640 260 
4,105 2,683 
NATURAL GAS AND OTHER:
Greater Des MoinesPleasant Hill, IAGas2003-2004511 511 
ElectrifarmWaterloo, IAGas or Oil1975-1978178 178 
Pleasant HillPleasant Hill, IAGas or Oil1990-1994155 155 
SycamoreJohnston, IAGas or Oil1974149 149 
13


FacilityNet
Year Installed /Net CapacityOwned Capacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy Source
Repowered(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
River HillsDes Moines, IAGas1966-1967118 118 
CoralvilleCoralville, IAGas197062 62 
MolineMoline, ILGas197060 60 
27 portable power modulesVariousOil200054 54 
ParrCharles City, IAGas196933 33 
1,320 1,320 
NUCLEAR:
Quad Cities Unit Nos. 1 and 2Cordova, ILUranium19721,822 455 
SOLAR:
Holliday CreekFort Dodge, IASolar2022100 100 
Arbor HillAdair, IASolar202224 24 
FranklinHampton, IASolar2022
NealSalix, IASolar2022
WaterlooWaterloo, IASolar2022
HillsHills, IASolar2022
141 141 
HYDROELECTRIC:
Moline Unit Nos. 1-4Moline, ILHydroelectric1941
Total Available Generating Capacity14,584 11,795 
(1)Repowered dates are associated with component replacements on existing wind-powered generating facilities commonly referred to by the IRS as repowering. IRS rules provide for re-establishment of the PTCs for an existing wind-powered generating facility upon the replacement of a significant portion of its components. If the degree of component replacement in such projects meets IRS guidelines, PTCs are re-established for 10 years at rates that depend upon the date on which construction begins.
(2)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates MidAmerican Energy's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
The following table shows the percentages of MidAmerican Energy's total energy supplied by energy source for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Wind and other renewable(1)
58 %52 %54 %
Coal21 27 19 
Nuclear10 
Natural gas
Total energy generated90 91 85 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other14 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
100 %100 %100 %
(1)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.

14


MidAmerican Energy is required to have accredited resources available for dispatch by MISO to continuously meet its customer's needs and reliably operate its electric system. The percentage of MidAmerican Energy's energy supplied by energy source varies from year to year and is subject to numerous operational and economic factors such as planned and unplanned outages, fuel commodity prices, fuel transportation costs, weather, environmental considerations, transmission constraints, and wholesale market prices of electricity. MidAmerican Energy evaluates these factors continuously in order to facilitate economic dispatch of its generating facilities by MISO. When factors for one energy source are less favorable, MidAmerican Energy places more reliance on other energy sources. For example, MidAmerican Energy can generate more electricity using its low cost wind-powered generating facilities when factors associated with these facilities are favorable. When factors associated with wind resources are less favorable, MidAmerican Energy must increase its reliance on more expensive generation or purchased electricity. Refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of energy cost recovery by jurisdiction.

Wind

MidAmerican Energy owns more wind-powered generating capacity than any other U.S. rate-regulated electric utility and believes wind-powered generation offers a viable, economical and environmentally prudent means of supplying electricity and complying with laws and regulations. Pursuant to ratemaking principles approved by the IUB, issued an order approving increasesfacilities accounting for 92% of MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating capacity in-service at December 31, 2022, are authorized to earn over their regulatory lives a fixed rate of return on equity ranging from 11.0% to 12.2% on the depreciated cost of their original construction, which excludes the cost of later replacements, in any future Iowa rate proceeding. MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities, including those facilities where a significant portion of the equipment was replaced, commonly referred to as repowered facilities, are eligible for federal renewable electricity PTCs for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service. PTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-powered generating facilities is produced and sold. PTCs for MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities currently in-service began expiring in 2014, with final expiration in 2032. Since 2014, MidAmerican Energy has repowered, or plans to repower, 2,204 MWs of wind-powered generating facilities for which PTCs had expired by the end of 2022.

Of the 7,414 MWs (nameplate capacity) of wind-powered generating facilities in-service as of December 31, 2022, 7,249 MWs were generating PTCs, including 2,310 MWs of repowered facilities. PTCs earned by MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service prior to 2013, except for repowered facilities, were included in MidAmerican Energy's Iowa EAC, through which MidAmerican Energy is allowed to recover fluctuations in its electric retail energy costs. All of the eligibility of those facilities to earn PTCs had expired by the end of 2022. MidAmerican Energy earned PTCs totaling $710 million, $574 million and $510 million in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of which 4%, 12% and 15%, respectively, were included in the Iowa EAC.

Coal

All of the coal-fueled generating facilities operated by MidAmerican Energy are fueled by low-sulfur, western coal from the Powder River Basin in northeast Wyoming. MidAmerican Energy's coal supply portfolio includes multiple suppliers and mines under short-term and multi-year agreements of varying terms and quantities through 2027. MidAmerican Energy believes supplies from these sources are presently adequate and available to meet MidAmerican Energy's needs. MidAmerican Energy's coal supply portfolio has substantially all of its expected 2023 and a majority of 2024 requirements under fixed-price contracts. MidAmerican Energy regularly monitors the western coal market for opportunities to enhance its coal supply portfolio.

MidAmerican Energy has a multi-year long-haul coal transportation agreement with BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF"), an affiliate company, for the delivery of coal to all of the MidAmerican Energy-operated coal-fueled generating facilities other than the George Neal Energy Center. Under this agreement, BNSF delivers coal directly to MidAmerican Energy's Walter Scott, Jr. Energy Center and to an interchange point with Canadian Pacific Railway Company for short-haul delivery to the Louisa Energy Center. MidAmerican Energy has a multi-year long-haul coal transportation agreement with Union Pacific Railroad Company for the delivery of coal to the George Neal Energy Center.

15


Nuclear

MidAmerican Energy is a 25% joint owner of Quad Cities Generating Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station"), a nuclear generating facility, which is currently licensed by the NRC for operation until December 14, 2032. Constellation Energy Generation, LLC ("Constellation Energy"), is the 75% joint owner and the operator of Quad Cities Station. Approximately one-third of the nuclear fuel assemblies in each reactor core at Quad Cities Station is replaced every 24 months. MidAmerican Energy has been advised by Constellation Energy that it does not anticipate it will have difficulty in obtaining the necessary uranium concentrates or conversion, enrichment or fabrication services to meet the nuclear fuel requirements of Quad Cities Station. In reaction to concerns about the profitability of Quad Cities Station and Constellation Energy's ability to continue its operation, in December 2016, Illinois passed legislation creating a zero emission standard, which went into effect June 1, 2017. The zero emission standard requires the Illinois Power Agency to purchase ZECs and recover the costs from certain ratepayers in Illinois, subject to certain limitations. Currently, Quad Cities is operating under agreements to provide Illinois load serving entities ZECs through June 1, 2027.
Natural Gas and Other

MidAmerican Energy uses natural gas and oil as fuel for intermediate and peak demand electric generation, igniter fuel, transmission support and standby purposes. These sources are presently in adequate supply and available to meet MidAmerican Energy's needs.

Regional Transmission Organizations

MidAmerican Energy sells and purchases electricity and ancillary services related to its generation and load in wholesale markets pursuant to the tariffs in those markets. MidAmerican Energy participates predominantly in the MISO energy and ancillary service markets, which provide MidAmerican Energy with wholesale opportunities over a large market area. MidAmerican Energy can enter into wholesale bilateral transactions in addition to market activity related to its assets. MidAmerican Energy is also authorized to participate in the Southwest Power Pool, Inc. and PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. markets and can contract with several other utilities in the region. MidAmerican Energy utilizes financial swaps and physical fixed-price electricity sales and purchases contracts to reduce its exposure to electricity price volatility.

MidAmerican Energy's decisions regarding additions to or reductions of its generation portfolio may be impacted by the MISO's minimum reserve margin requirement. The MISO requires each member to maintain a minimum reserve margin of its accredited generating capacity over its peak demand obligation based on the member's load forecast filed with the MISO each year. The MISO's reserve requirement was 8.7% for the summer of 2022. MidAmerican Energy's owned and contracted capacity accredited for the 2022-2023 MISO capacity auction was 5,591 MWs compared to a peak demand obligation of 5,078 MWs, or a reserve margin of 10.1%. Beginning with the 2023-2024 planning year, the MISO will implement a seasonal construct requiring each member to maintain a minimum seasonal reserve margin of its accredited generating capacity over its seasonal peak demand obligation based on the member's seasonal load forecast filed with the MISO each year. The reserve requirements for the 2023-2024 planning year will be 7.4% for summer 2023, 14.9% for fall 2023, 25.5% for winter 2023-2024 and 24.5% for spring 2024. Accredited capacity represents the amount of generation available to meet the requirements of MidAmerican Energy's retail customers and consists of MidAmerican Energy-owned generation, interruptible retail customer load, certain customer private generation that MidAmerican Energy is contractually allowed to dispatch and the net amount of capacity purchases and sales, excluding sales into the MISO annual capacity auction. Accredited capacity may vary significantly from the nominal capacity ratings, particularly for wind or solar facilities whose output is dependent upon energy resource availability at any given time. Additionally, the actual amount of generating capacity available at any time may be less than the accredited capacity due to regulatory restrictions, transmission constraints, fuel restrictions and generating units being temporarily out of service for inspection, maintenance, refueling, modifications or other reasons.

16


Transmission and Distribution

MidAmerican Energy's transmission and distribution systems included 4,600 circuit miles of transmission lines in four states, 25,400 circuit miles of distribution lines and 345 substations as of December 31, 2022. Electricity from MidAmerican Energy's generating facilities and purchased electricity is delivered to wholesale markets and its retail customers via the transmission facilities of MidAmerican Energy and others. MidAmerican Energy participates in the MISO capacity, energy and ancillary services markets as a transmission-owning member and, accordingly, operates its transmission assets at the direction of the MISO. The MISO manages its energy and ancillary service markets using reliability-constrained economic dispatch of the region's generation. For both the day-ahead and real-time (every five minutes) markets, the MISO analyzes generation commitments to provide market liquidity and transparent pricing while maintaining transmission system reliability by minimizing congestion and maximizing efficient energy transmission. Additionally, through its FERC-approved OATT, the MISO performs the role of transmission service provider throughout the MISO footprint and administers the long-term planning function. The MISO costs of the participants are shared among the participants through a number of mechanisms in accordance with the MISO tariff.

Regulated Natural Gas Operations

MidAmerican Energy is engaged in the distribution of natural gas to customers in its service territory and the related procurement, transportation and storage of natural gas for the benefit of those customers. MidAmerican Energy purchases natural gas from various suppliers and contracts with interstate natural gas pipelines for transportation of the gas to MidAmerican Energy's service territory and for storage and balancing services. MidAmerican Energy sells natural gas and delivery services to end-use customers on its distribution system; sells natural gas to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies; and transports natural gas through its distribution system for end-use customers who have independently secured their supply of natural gas. During 2022, 54% of the total natural gas delivered through MidAmerican Energy's distribution system was associated with transportation service.

Natural gas property consists primarily of natural gas mains and service lines, meters, and related distribution equipment, including feeder lines to communities served from natural gas pipelines owned by others. The natural gas distribution facilities of MidAmerican Energy included 24,600 miles of natural gas main and service lines as of December 31, 2022.

Customer Usage and Seasonality

The percentages of natural gas sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail customers by jurisdiction for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Iowa76 %76 %76 %
South Dakota14 13 13 
Illinois10 10 
Nebraska
100 %100 %100 %

17


The percentages of natural gas sold to MidAmerican Energy's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer, total Dths of natural gas sold, total Dths of transportation service and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Residential47 %44 %45 %
Commercial(1)
22 20 20 
Industrial(1)
Total retail74 69 70 
Wholesale(2)
26 31 30 
100 %100 %100 %
Total Dths of natural gas sold (in thousands)119,508111,916114,399
Total Dths of transportation service (in thousands)102,827112,631110,263
Total average number of retail customers (in thousands)789781774
(1)Commercial and industrial customers are classified primarily based on the nature of their business and natural gas usage. Commercial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas principally for heating. Industrial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas principally for their manufacturing processes.
(2)Wholesale sales are generally made to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies for eventual resale to end-use customers.

There are seasonal variations in MidAmerican Energy's regulated natural gas business that are principally due to the use of natural gas for heating. Typically, 50-60% of MidAmerican Energy's regulated retail natural gas revenue is reported in the months of January, February, March and December.

On January 29, 2019, MidAmerican Energy recorded its all-time highest peak-day delivery through its distribution system of 1,319,361 Dths. This peak-day delivery consisted of 68% traditional retail sales service and 32% transportation service. MidAmerican Energy's 2022/2023 winter heating season preliminary peak-day delivery as of February 2, 2023, was 1,311,920 Dths, reached on December 22, 2022. This preliminary peak-day delivery consisted of 71% traditional retail sales service and 29% transportation service.

Natural Gas Supply and Capacity

MidAmerican Energy uses several strategies designed to maintain a reliable natural gas supply and reduce the impact of volatility in natural gas prices on its regulated retail natural gas customers. These strategies include the purchase of a geographically diverse supply portfolio from producers and third-party energy marketing companies, the use of interstate pipeline storage services and MidAmerican Energy's LNG peaking facilities, and the use of financial derivatives to fix the price on a portion of the anticipated natural gas requirements of MidAmerican Energy's customers. Refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the PGAs.

MidAmerican Energy contracts for firm natural gas pipeline capacity to transport natural gas from key production areas and liquid market centers to its service territory through direct interconnects to the pipeline systems of several interstate natural gas pipeline systems, including Northern Natural Gas, an affiliate company. MidAmerican Energy has multiple pipeline interconnections into several larger markets within its distribution system. Multiple pipeline interconnections create competition among pipeline suppliers for transportation capacity to serve those markets, thus reducing costs. In addition, multiple pipeline interconnections increase delivery reliability and give MidAmerican Energy the ability to optimize delivery of the lowest cost supply from the various production areas and liquid market centers into these markets. Benefits to MidAmerican Energy's distribution system customers are shared among all jurisdictions through a consolidated PGA.

At times, the natural gas pipeline capacity available through MidAmerican Energy's firm capacity portfolio may exceed the requirements of retail customers on MidAmerican Energy's distribution system. Firm capacity in excess of MidAmerican Energy's system needs can be released to other companies to achieve optimum use of the available capacity. Past IUB and South Dakota Public Utilities Commission ("SDPUC") rulings have allowed MidAmerican Energy to retain 30% of the revenue on the resold capacity, with the remaining 70% being returned to customers through the PGAs.

18


MidAmerican Energy utilizes interstate pipeline natural gas storage services to meet retail customer requirements, manage fluctuations in demand due to changes in weather and other usage factors and manage variation in seasonal natural gas pricing. MidAmerican Energy typically withdraws natural gas from storage during the heating season when customer demand is historically at its peak and injects natural gas into storage during off-peak months when customer demand is historically lower. MidAmerican Energy also utilizes its three LNG facilities to meet peak day demands during the winter heating season. Interstate pipeline storage services and MidAmerican Energy's LNG facilities reduce dependence on natural gas purchases during the volatile winter heating season and can deliver a significant portion of MidAmerican Energy's anticipated retail sales requirements on a peak winter day. For MidAmerican Energy's 2022/2023 winter heating season preliminary peak-day of December 22, 2022, supply sources used to meet deliveries to traditional retail sales service customers included 54% from purchases delivered on interstate pipelines, 35% from interstate pipeline storage services and 11% from MidAmerican Energy's LNG facilities.

MidAmerican Energy attempts to optimize the value of its regulated transportation capacity, natural gas supply and interstate pipeline storage services by engaging in wholesale transactions. IUB and SDPUC rulings have allowed MidAmerican Energy to retain 50% of the respective jurisdictional margins earned on certain wholesale sales of natural gas, with the remaining 50% being returned to customers through the PGAs.

MidAmerican Energy is not aware of any factors that would cause material difficulties in meeting its anticipated retail customer demand under normal operating conditions for the foreseeable future.

Energy Efficiency Programs

MidAmerican Energy has provided a comprehensive set of demand- and energy-reduction programs to its Iowa electric and natural gas customers since 1990. The programs, collectively referred to as energy efficiency programs, are designed to reduce energy consumption and more effectively manage when energy is used, including management of seasonal peak loads. Current programs offer services to customers such as energy engineering audits and information on how to improve the efficiency of their homes and businesses. To assist customers in investing in energy efficiency, MidAmerican Energy offers rebates or incentives encouraging the purchase and installation of high-efficiency equipment such as lighting, heating and cooling equipment, weatherization, motors, process equipment and systems, as well as incentives for efficient construction. Incentives are also paid to residential customers who participate in the air conditioner load control program and nonresidential customers who participate in the nonresidential load management program. In Iowa, legislation passed in 2018 provides that projected cumulative average annual costs for a natural gas energy efficiency plan cannot exceed 1.5% of expected Iowa natural gas retail revenue and, for an electric demand response plan and separately for an electric energy efficiency plan other than demand response, cannot exceed 2.0% of expected annual Iowa electric retail revenue. Although subject to prudence reviews, state regulations allow for contemporaneous recovery of costs incurred for energy efficiency programs through state-specific energy efficiency service charges paid by all retail electric baseand natural gas customers. In 2022, $43 million was expensed for MidAmerican Energy's energy efficiency programs, which resulted in estimated first-year energy savings of 133,000 MWhs of electricity and 174,000 Dths of natural gas and an estimated peak load reduction of 384 MWs of electricity and 2,444 Dths per day of natural gas.

Human Capital

Employees

All of MidAmerican Funding's employees are employed by MidAmerican Energy. As of December 31, 2022, MidAmerican Energy had approximately 3,400 employees, of which approximately 1,400 were covered by union contracts. MidAmerican Energy has three separate contracts with locals of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and the United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union. A contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers covering substantially all of the union employees expires April 30, 2027. For more information regarding MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.

19


NV ENERGY (NEVADA POWER AND SIERRA PACIFIC)

General

NV Energy, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is an energy holding company headquartered in Nevada whose principal subsidiaries are Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are indirect consolidated subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway. Nevada Power is a U.S. regulated electric utility company serving 1.0 million retail customers primarily in the Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson and adjoining areas. Sierra Pacific is a U.S. regulated electric and natural gas utility company serving 0.4 million retail electric customers and 0.2 million retail and transportation natural gas customers in northern Nevada. The Nevada Utilities are principally engaged in the business of generating, transmitting, distributing and selling electricity and, in the case of Sierra Pacific, in distributing, selling and transporting natural gas. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific have electric service territories covering approximately 4,500 square miles and 41,400 square miles, respectively. Sierra Pacific has a natural gas service territory covering approximately 900 square miles in Reno and Sparks. Principal industries served by the Nevada Utilities include gaming, recreation, warehousing, manufacturing and governmental services. Sierra Pacific also serves the mining industry. The Nevada Utilities buy and sell electricity on the wholesale market with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants to balance and optimize economic benefits of electricity generation, retail customer loads and wholesale transactions.

The Nevada Utilities' electric and natural gas operations are conducted under numerous nonexclusive franchise agreements, revocable permits and licenses obtained from federal, state and local authorities. The franchise agreements, with various expiration dates, are typically for 20- to 25-year terms. The Nevada Utilities operate under certificates of public convenience and necessity as regulated by the PUCN, and as such the Nevada Utilities have an obligation to provide electricity service to those customers within their service territory. In return, the PUCN has established rates overon a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow the Nevada Utilities an opportunity to recover all prudently incurred costs of providing services and an opportunity to earn a reasonable return on their investment.

NV Energy's monthly net income is affected by the seasonal impact of weather on electricity and natural gas sales and seasonal retail electricity prices from the Nevada Utilities'. For 2022, 78% of NV Energy annual net income was recorded in the months of June through September.

Regulated electric utility operations is Nevada Power's only segment while regulated electric utility operations and regulated natural gas operations are the two segments of Sierra Pacific.

Sierra Pacific's operating revenue and operating income derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 were as follows (dollars in millions):
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Electric$1,025 86 %$848 88 %$738 86 %
Gas168 14 117 12 116 14 
Total operating revenue$1,193 100 %$965 100 %$854 100 %
Operating income:
Electric$146 88 %$148 89 %$147 89 %
Gas19 12 19 11 18 11 
Total operating income$165 100 %$167 100 %$165 100 %

Nevada Power was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in 1929 and its principal executive offices are located at 6226 West Sahara Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89146, its telephone number is (702) 402-5000 and its internet address is www.nvenergy.com.

Sierra Pacific was incorporated under the laws of the state of Nevada in 1912 and its principal executive offices are located at 6100 Neil Road, Reno, Nevada 89511, its telephone number is (775) 834-4011 and its internet address is www.nvenergy.com.

20


Regulated Electric Operations

Customers

The Nevada Utilities' sell electricity to retail customers in a single state jurisdiction. Electricity sold to the Nevada Utilities' retail and wholesale customers by class of customer and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Nevada Power:
GWhs sold:
Residential10,299 42 %10,415 44 %10,477 46 %
Commercial4,904 21 4,838 21 4,591 20 
Industrial5,630 23 5,270 22 4,881 21 
Other191 198 195 
Total fully bundled21,024 87 20,721 88 20,144 88 
Distribution only service2,786 11 2,646 11 2,425 11 
Total retail23,810 98 23,367 99 22,569 99 
Wholesale586 356 374 
Total GWhs sold24,396 100 %23,723 100 %22,943 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential886 89 %871 88 %856 88 %
Commercial113 11 112 12 110 12 
Industrial— — — 
Total1,001 100 %985 100 %968 100 %
Sierra Pacific:
GWhs sold:
Residential2,747 22 %2,769 23 %2,672 23 %
Commercial3,124 26 3,056 26 2,977 26 
Industrial2,867 23 3,716 31 3,544 31 
Other13 — 15 — 15 — 
Total fully bundled8,751 71 9,556 80 9,208 80 
Distribution only service2,757 23 1,639 14 1,670 15 
Total retail11,508 94 11,195 94 10,878 95 
Wholesale741 656 548 
Total GWhs sold12,249 100 %11,851 100 %11,426 100 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):
Residential322 87 %316 87 %310 86 %
Commercial49 13 49 13 49 14 
Total371 100 %365 100 %359 100 %

Variations in weather, economic conditions, particularly for gaming, mining and wholesale customers and various conservation, energy efficiency and private generation measures and programs can impact customer energy requirements. Wholesale sales are impacted by market prices for energy relative to the incremental cost to generate power.

There are seasonal variations in the Nevada Utilities' electric business that are principally related to weather and the related use of electricity for air conditioning. Typically, 48-52% of Nevada Power's and 37-40% of Sierra Pacific's regulated electric revenue is reported in the months of June through September.

21


The annual hourly peak customer demand on the Nevada Utilities' electric systems occurs as a result of air conditioning use during the cooling season. Peak demand represents the highest demand on a given day and at a given hour. On July 11, 2022, customer usage of electricity caused an hourly peak demand of 6,033 MWs on Nevada Power's electric system, which is 267 MWs less than the record hourly peak demand of 6,300 MWs set July 9, 2021. On July 27, 2022, customer usage of electricity caused an hourly peak demand of 1,962 MWs on Sierra Pacific's electric system, which is 144 MWs less than the record hourly peak demand of 2,106 MWs set July 12, 2021.

Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply

The Nevada Utilities have ownership interest in a diverse portfolio of generating facilities. The following table presents certain information regarding the Nevada Utilities' owned generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:
FacilityNet Owned
Net CapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationEnergy SourceInstalled
(MWs)(1)
(MWs)(1)
Nevada Power:
NATURAL GAS:
LenzieLas Vegas, NVNatural gas20061,185 1,185 
ClarkLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1973-20081,102 1,102 
Harry AllenLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1995-2011628 628 
HigginsPrimm, NVNatural gas2004589 589 
SilverhawkLas Vegas, NVNatural gas2004590 590 
Las VegasLas Vegas, NVNatural gas1994-2003272 272 
Sun PeakLas Vegas, NVNatural gas/oil1991210 210 
4,576 4,576 
RENEWABLES:
NellisLas Vegas, NVSolar201515 15 
GoodspringsGoodsprings, NVWaste heat2010
20 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity4,596 4,596 
Sierra Pacific:
NATURAL GAS:
TracySparks, NVNatural gas1974-2008773 773 
Ft. ChurchillYerington, NVNatural gas1968-1971196 196 
Clark MountainSparks, NVNatural gas1994132 132 
1,101 1,101 
COAL:
Valmy Unit Nos. 1 and 2Valmy, NVCoal1981-1985522 261 
RENEWABLES:
Ft. ChurchillYerington, NVSolar201520 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity1,643 1,382 
Total NV Energy Available Generating Capacity6,239 5,978 
PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION:
Dry LakeDry Lake, NVSolarEst. 2023150 150 
6,389 6,128 
(1)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates Nevada Power or Sierra Pacific's ownership of Facility Net Capacity.

22


The following table shows the percentages of the Nevada Utilities' total energy supplied by energy source for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Nevada Power:
Total energy generated - natural gas60 %64 %66 %
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
23 19 15 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)10 13 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other
100 %100 %100 %
Sierra Pacific:
Natural gas41 %43 %48 %
Coal11 11 
Total energy generated52 54 56 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (renewable)(1)
28 17 15 
Energy purchased - long-term contracts (non-renewable)11 14 24 
Energy purchased - short-term contracts and other15 
100 %100 %100 %
(1)     All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements, (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities, or (c) excluded from energy purchased.

The Nevada Utilities are required to have resources available to continuously meet their customer needs and reliably operate their electric systems. The percentage of the Nevada Utilities' energy supplied by energy source varies from year-to-year and is subject to numerous operational and economic factors such as planned and unplanned outages; fuel commodity prices; fuel transportation costs; weather; environmental considerations; transmission constraints; and wholesale market prices of electricity. The Nevada Utilities evaluate these factors continuously in order to facilitate economic dispatch of their generating facilities. When factors for one energy source are less favorable, the Nevada Utilities place more reliance on other energy sources. As long as the Nevada Utilities' purchases are deemed prudent by the PUCN, through their annual prudency review, the Nevada Utilities are permitted to recover the cost of fuel and purchased power. The Nevada Utilities also have the ability to reset quarterly the BTERs, with PUCN approval, based on the last 12 months fuel costs and purchased power and to reset quarterly DEAA.

The Nevada Utilities have adopted an approach to managing the energy supply function that has three primary elements. The first element is a set of management guidelines for procuring and optimizing the supply portfolio that is consistent with the requirements of a load serving entity with a full requirements obligation, and with the growth of private generation serving a small but growing group of customers with partial requirements. The second element is an energy risk management and control approach that ensures clear separation of roles between the day-to-day management of risks and compliance monitoring and control and ensures clear distinction between policy setting (or planning) and execution. Lastly, the Nevada Utilities pursue a process of ongoing regulatory involvement and acknowledgment of the resource portfolio management plans.

The Nevada Utilities have entered into multiple long-term power purchase contracts (three or more years) with suppliers that generate electricity utilizing renewable resources and natural gas. Nevada Power has entered into contracts with a total capacity of 3,522 MWs with contract termination dates ranging from 2023 to 2067. Included in these contracts are 3,352 MWs of capacity from renewable energy, of which 1,818 MWs of capacity are under development or construction and not currently available. Sierra Pacific has entered into contracts with a total capacity of 985 MWs with contract termination dates ranging from 2023 to 2049. Included in these contracts are 973 MWs of capacity from renewable energy, of which 25 MWs of capacity are under development or construction and not currently available.

The Nevada Utilities manage certain risks relating to their supply of electricity and fuel requirements by entering into various contracts, which may be accounted for as derivatives, including forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements. Refer to NV Energy's "General Regulation" section in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of energy cost recovery by jurisdiction and Nevada Power's Item 7A and Sierra Pacific's Item 7A in this Form 10-K for a discussion of commodity price risk and derivative contracts.

23


Natural Gas

The Nevada Utilities rely on indexed physical gas purchases for the majority of natural gas needed to operate their generating facilities. To secure natural gas supplies for the generating facilities, the Nevada Utilities execute purchases pursuant to a PUCN approved four season laddering strategy. In 2022, natural gas supply net purchases averaged 299,831 and 149,418 Dths per day with the winter period contracts averaging 256,039 and 120,985 Dths per day and the summer period contracts averaging 330,731 and 189,714 Dths per day for Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, respectively. The Nevada Utilities believe supplies from these sources are presently adequate and available to meet its needs.

The Nevada Utilities contract for firm natural gas pipeline capacity to transport natural gas from production areas to their service territory through direct interconnects to the pipeline systems of several interstate natural gas pipeline systems, including Nevada Power who contracts with Kern River, an affiliated company. Sierra Pacific utilizes natural gas storage contracted from interstate pipelines to meet retail customer requirements and to manage the daily changes in demand due to changes in weather and other usage factors. The stored natural gas is typically replaced during off-peak months when the demand for natural gas is historically lower than during the heating season.

Coal

Sierra Pacific relies on spot market solicitations for coal supplies and will regularly monitor the western coal market for opportunities to meet these needs. Sierra Pacific has a transportation services contract with Union Pacific Railroad Company to ship coal from various origins in central Utah, western Colorado and Wyoming that expires December 31, 2025. Sierra Pacific has a coal purchase agreement that extends through December 2023. The Valmy generating facility, Sierra Pacific's remaining facility requiring coal, has an approved retirement date of December 2025. Nevada Power has no coal requirements.

Energy Imbalance Market

The Nevada Utilities participate in the EIM operated by the California ISO, which reduces costs to serve customers through more efficient dispatch of a larger and more diverse pool of resources, more effectively integrates renewables and enhances reliability through improved situational awareness and responsiveness. The EIM expands the real-time component of the California ISO's market technology to optimize and balance electricity supply and demand every five minutes across the EIM footprint. The EIM is voluntary and available to all balancing authorities in the western U.S. EIM market participants submit bids to the California ISO market operator before each hour for each generating resource they choose to be dispatched by the market. Each bid is comprised of a dispatchable operating range, ramp rate and prices across the operating range. The California ISO market operator uses sophisticated technology to select the least-cost resources to meet demand and send simultaneous dispatch signals to every participating generator across the EIM footprint every five minutes. In addition to generation resource bids, the California ISO market operator also receives continuous real-time updates of the transmission grid network, meteorological and load forecast information that it uses to optimize dispatch instructions. Outside the EIM footprint, utilities in the western U.S. do not utilize comparable technology and are largely limited to transactions within the borders of their balancing authority area to balance supply and demand intra-hour using a combination of manual and automated dispatch. The EIM delivers customer benefits by leveraging automation and resource diversity to result in more efficient dispatch, more effective integration of renewables and improved situational awareness. Benefits are expected to increase further with renewable resource expansion and as more entities join the EIM bringing incremental diversity.

Transmission and Distribution

The Nevada Utilities' transmission system is part of the Western Interconnection, a regional grid in the U.S. The Western Interconnection includes the interconnected transmission systems of 14 western states, two Canadian provinces and parts of Mexico. The Nevada Utilities' transmission system, together with contractual rights on other transmission systems, enables the Nevada Utilities to integrate and access generation resources to meet their customer load requirements. Nevada Power's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 1,900 miles of transmission lines, 14,000 miles of distribution lines and 220 substations as of December 31, 2022. Sierra Pacific's transmission and distribution systems included approximately 4,200 miles of transmission lines, 9,600 miles of distribution lines and 210 substations as of December 31, 2022.

24


ON Line is a 231-mile, 500-kV transmission line connecting Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's service territories. ON Line provides the ability to jointly dispatch energy throughout Nevada and provide access to renewable energy resources in parts of northern and eastern Nevada, which enhances the Nevada Utilities' ability to manage and optimize their generating facilities. ON Line provides between 600 MWs northbound and 900 MWs southbound of transfer capability with interconnection between the Robinson Summit substation on the Sierra Pacific system and the Harry Allen substation on the Nevada Power system. ON Line was a joint project between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC. The Nevada Utilities own a 25% interest in ON Line and have entered into a long-term transmission use agreement with Great Basin Transmission, LLC for its 75% interest in ON Line until 2054. The Nevada Utilities share of its 25% interest in ON Line and the long-term transmission use agreement is split 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific.

The PUCN has approved the Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program, with an estimated cost of approximately $2.6 billion, which builds a foundation for the Nevada Utilities to accommodate existing and future transmission network customers, increase transmission system reliability, create access to diversified renewable resources, facilitate development of existing designated solar energy zones, facilitate conventional generation retirement and achieve Nevada's carbon reduction and eventual net-zero objectives. The Greenlink program consists of a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. The Greenlink program will be constructed in stages that are estimated to be placed in-service between December 2026 and December 2028. The Nevada Utilities will jointly own and operate the Greenlink transmission lines. Through December 31, 2022, $51 million had been spent.

Future Generation, Conservation and Energy Efficiency

Energy Supply Planning

Within the energy supply planning process, there are four key components covering different time frames:

IRPs are filed by the Nevada Utilities for approval by the PUCN every three years and the Nevada Utilities may, as necessary, file amendments to their IRPs. IRPs are prepared in compliance with equal annualizedNevada laws and regulations and cover a 20-year period. Nevada law governing the IRP process was modified in 2017 and now requires joint filings by Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. IRPs develop a comprehensive, integrated plan that considers customer energy requirements and propose the resources to meet those requirements in a manner that is consistent with prevailing market fundamentals. The ultimate goal of the IRPs is to balance the objectives of minimizing costs and reducing volatility while reliably meeting the electric needs of the Nevada Utilities' customers. Costs incurred to complete projects approved through the IRP process still remain subject to review for reasonableness by the PUCN.
Energy Supply Plans ("ESP") are filed with the PUCN for approval and operate in conjunction with the PUCN-approved 20-year IRP. The ESP has a one- to three-year planning horizon and is an intermediate-term resource procurement and risk management plan that establishes the supply portfolio strategies within which intermediate-term resource requirements will be met with PUCN approval required for executing contracts of longer than three years.
Distributed Resource Plans ("DRP") are filed with the PUCN for approval and operate in conjunction with the PUCN-approved 20-year IRP. The DRP establishes a formal process to aid in the cost-effective integration of distributed resources into the Nevada Utilities' distribution and transmission process and ultimately the NV Energy utilities' electricity grid.
Action plans are filed with the PUCN for approval and operate in conjunction with the PUCN-approved 20-year IRP and PUCN-approved ESP. The action plan establishes tactical execution activities with a three-year focus.

25


In June 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed a joint application for approval of their 2022-2041 Triennial IRP, 2022-2024 ESP and 2022-2024 Action Plan. As part of the filing, the Nevada Utilities requested approval of 600 MWs of solar photovoltaic generating resources with 480 MWs of battery energy storage capacity, three battery energy storage projects with 66 MWs of capacity, the acquisition of one existing solar photovoltaic generating facility with 19.5 MWs of capacity that is currently leased to Sierra Pacific, and network upgrades associated with the new renewable energy projects. In September 2021, a hearing was held for the generation upgrades portion of the application, which resulted in an order approving that portion of the joint IRP. The Nevada Utilities filed a partial party stipulation resolving all issues related to the ESP, load forecast and fuel and purchased power price portions of the joint IRP. In October 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed a corrected stipulation, which was approved by the PUCN. In November 2021, a hearing was conducted for the remaining portions of the joint IRP and in December 2021, the PUCN issued an order granting in part and denying in part. The PUCN approved the construction of the 600 MWs of solar photovoltaic generating resources with 480 MWs of battery energy storage capacity, the acquisition of the existing solar photovoltaic generating facility and the network upgrade, among other items. However, the three additional battery energy storage projects were deferred for approval in future plans and the PUCN declined to retire Valmy 1 early and made adjustments to the approved budget for developing and conducting the distributed resource energy trial.

In September 2021, in compliance with Senate Bill ("SB") 448, the Nevada Utilities filed an amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for approval of their Transmission Infrastructure for a Clean Energy Economy Plan that sets forth a plan for the construction of certain high-voltage transmission infrastructure which includes a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line known as Greenlink North and a 32-mile, 525-kV transmission segment of Greenlink West. In January 2022, the Nevada Utilities reached a settlement with all the intervening parties and presented a stipulation before the PUCN related to the Greenlink transmission project. The settlement allows for the Nevada Utilities to receive approval to construct the Greenlink North project and the remaining segment of the Greenlink West project. The settlement allows the Nevada Utilities to designate these projects as critical facilities that will allow the Nevada Utilities to propose financial incentives in future proceedings. Potential financial incentives include construction work in process included in rate base and the ability to use regulatory asset accounting treatment. The Nevada Utilities agreed not to seek an enhanced return on investment at the state level as part of the settlement. The stipulation was approved by the PUCN in January 2022.

In March 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed the first amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for approval of the battery energy storage system with 220 MWs of capacity; a $3.5 million funding request to further study and perform due diligence on the pumped storage hydro project with a capacity of 1,000 MW, an addition of the geothermal facility purchase power agreement for 25 MW of renewable energy, peak firing project upgrades at the existing generating units to yield 48 MW of additional on-peak generation thermal energy storage project to increase the generating station's peak capacity by 18 MW, and network upgrades associated with the battery energy storage system. In April 2022, a partial stipulation was filed to remedy the redaction of the purchase power agreement pricing and in June 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed a settlement stipulation resolving all remaining issues. The PUCN approved the stipulation in July 2022.

In compliance with SB 448, the Nevada Utilities filed their second and third amendments to the 2021 joint IRP in July and September 2022, respectively. The Nevada Utilities requested an approval to amend the Demand Side Plan for the action period for 2022-2024 in July's filing and requested in September an approval of a DRP amendment to implement the state's first Transportation Electrification Plan ("TEP") and approve proposed tariffs and schedules to implement the TEP. In November 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed an all-party settlement stipulation of the second amendment to the IRP, resolving all issues. A hearing related to the application for approval of the third amendment was held in February 2023.

In November 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed their fourth amendment to the 2021 joint IRP requesting an approval of a generation update to the Supply Plan, an addition of 400 MW of peaking combustion turbines, a 120 MW geothermal portfolio long-term power purchase agreement, a 20 MW new geothermal technology long-term purchase power agreement, and a 200 MW grid-tied battery energy storage system at the Valmy generating facility as well as necessary transmission upgrades. An order is expected in the first half of 2023.

26


Energy Efficiency Programs

The Nevada Utilities have provided a comprehensive set of energy efficiency, demand response and conservation programs to their Nevada electric customers. The programs are designed to reduce energy consumption and more effectively manage when energy is used, including management of seasonal peak loads. Current programs offer services to customers such as energy audits and customer education and awareness efforts that provide information on how to improve the efficiency of their homes and businesses. To assist customers in investing in energy efficiency, the Nevada Utilities have offered rebates or incentives encouraging the purchase and installation of high-efficiency equipment such as lighting, heating and cooling equipment, weatherization, motors, process equipment and systems, as well as incentives for efficient construction. Incentives are also paid to residential customers who participate in the air conditioner load control program and nonresidential customers who participate in the nonresidential load management program. Energy efficiency program costs are recovered through annual rates set by the PUCN and adjusted based on the Nevada Utilities' annual filing to recover current program costs and any over or under collections from the prior filing, subject to prudence review. During 2022, Nevada Power spent $34 million on energy efficiency programs, resulting in an estimated 205,974 MWhs of electric energy savings and an estimated 179 MWs of electric peak load management. During 2022, Sierra Pacific spent $8 million on energy efficiency programs, resulting in an estimated 40,539 MWhs of electric energy savings and an estimated 23 MWs of electric peak load management.

Regulated Natural Gas Operations

Sierra Pacific is engaged in the distribution of natural gas to customers in its service territory and the related procurement, transportation and storage of natural gas for the benefit of those customers. Sierra Pacific purchases natural gas from various suppliers and contracts with interstate natural gas pipelines for transportation of the natural gas from the production areas to Sierra Pacific's service territory and for storage services to manage fluctuations in system demand and seasonal pricing. Sierra Pacific sells natural gas and delivery services to end-use customers on its distribution system; sells natural gas to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies; and transports natural gas through its distribution system for a number of end-use customers who have independently secured their supply of natural gas. During 2022, 7% of the total natural gas delivered through Sierra Pacific's distribution system was for transportation service.

Natural gas property consists primarily of natural gas mains and service lines, meters, and related distribution equipment, including feeder lines to communities served from natural gas pipelines owned by others. The natural gas distribution facilities of Sierra Pacific included 3,600 miles of natural gas mains and service lines as of December 31, 2022.

Customer Usage and Seasonality

The percentages of natural gas sold to Sierra Pacific's retail and wholesale customers by class of customer, total Dths of natural gas sold, total Dths of transportation service and the average number of retail customers for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Residential55 %53 %56 %
Commercial(1)
28 28 28 
Industrial(1)
11 10 10 
Total retail94 91 94 
Wholesale(2)
100 %100 %100 %
Total Dths of natural gas sold (in thousands)20,62220,05018,622
Total Dths of transportation service (in thousands)1,5761,8502,217
Total average number of retail customers (in thousands)180177174

(1)Commercial and industrial customers are classified primarily based on the nature of their business and natural gas usage. Commercial customers are non-residential customers with monthly gas usage less than 12,000 therms during five consecutive winter months. Industrial customers are non-residential customers that use natural gas in excess of 12,000 therms during one or more winter months.

(2)Wholesale sales are generally made to other utilities, municipalities and energy marketing companies for eventual resale to end-use customers.

27


There are seasonal variations in Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas business that are principally due to the use of natural gas for heating. Typically, 47-56% of Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas revenue is reported in the months of December through March.

On December 18, 2022, Sierra Pacific recorded its highest peak-day natural gas delivery of 152,157 Dths, which is 11,417 Dths less than the record peak-day delivery of 163,574 Dths set on December 9, 2013. This peak-day delivery consisted of 96% traditional retail sales service and 4% transportation service.

Fuel Supply and Capacity

The purchase of natural gas for Sierra Pacific's regulated natural gas operations is done in combination with the purchase of natural gas for Sierra Pacific's regulated electric operations. In response to energy supply challenges, Sierra Pacific has adopted an approach to managing the energy supply function that has three primary elements, as discussed earlier under Generating Facilities and Fuel Supply. Similar to Sierra Pacific's regulated electric operations, as long as Sierra Pacific's purchases of natural gas are deemed prudent by the PUCN, through its annual prudency review, Sierra Pacific is permitted to recover the cost of natural gas. Sierra Pacific also has the ability, with PUCN approval, to reset quarterly the BTERs, based on the last 12 months fuel costs, and to reset quarterly DEAA.

Human Capital

Employees

As of December 31, 2022, Nevada Power had approximately 1,400 employees, of which approximately 700 were covered by a union contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific had approximately 1,000 employees, of which approximately 500 were covered by a union contract with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers.

For more information regarding Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.

NORTHERN POWERGRID

Northern Powergrid, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is a holding company which owns two companies that distribute electricity in Great Britain, Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc. In addition to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, Northern Powergrid also owns a meter asset rental business that leases meters to energy suppliers in the United Kingdom, an engineering contracting business that provides electrical infrastructure contracting services primarily to third parties, a hydrocarbon exploration and development business that is focused on developing integrated upstream gas projects in Europe and Australia and ownership interests in two solar generation facilities in Australia having a total net owned capacity of 260 MWs.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies serve 4.0 million end-users and operate in the north-east of England from North Northumberland through Tyne and Wear, County Durham and Yorkshire to North Lincolnshire, an area covering 10,000 square miles. The principal function of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies is to build, maintain and operate the electricity distribution network through which the end-user receives a supply of electricity.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies receive electricity from the national grid transmission system and from generators that are directly connected to the distribution network and distribute it to end-users' premises using their networks of transformers, switchgear and distribution lines and cables. Substantially all of the end-users in the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution service areas are directly or indirectly connected to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' networks and electricity can only be delivered to these end-users through their distribution systems, thus providing the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies with distribution volumes that are relatively stable from year to year. The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies charge fees for the use of their distribution systems to the suppliers of electricity.

28


The suppliers purchase electricity from generators, sell the electricity to end-user customers and use the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution networks pursuant to an industry standard "Distribution Connection and Use of System Agreement." During 2022, E.ON and certain of its affiliates and British Gas Trading Limited represented 22% and 14%, respectively, of the total combined distribution revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies. Variations in demand from end-users can affect the revenues that are received by the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies in any year, but such variations have no effect on the total revenue that the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies are allowed to recover in a price control period. Under- or over-recoveries against price-controlled revenues are carried forward into prices for future years.

During 2021, 28 suppliers went bankrupt due to rising wholesale prices, particularly for natural gas. This resulted in energy supply costs being higher than the Ofgem set variable tariff price cap that can be charged to customers. Any distribution use of system bad debts suffered by Northern Powergrid is recoverable in future distribution use of systems revenue.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' combined service territory features a diverse economy with no dominant sector. The mix of rural, agricultural, urban and industrial areas covers a broad customer base ranging from domestic usage through farming and retail to major industry including automotives, chemicals, mining, steelmaking and offshore marine construction. The industry within the area is concentrated around the principal centers of Newcastle, Middlesbrough, Sheffield and Leeds.

The price-controlled revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies is set out in the special conditions of the licenses of those companies. The licenses are enforced by the regulator, GEMA, through Ofgem, and limit increases into allowed revenues (or may require decreases) based upon the rate of $45 million,inflation, other specified factors and other regulatory action. The current electricity distribution price control became effective August 2013 and again on JanuaryApril 1, 2015 and 2016,will continue through March 31, 2023. Ofgem has set the next price control for the five-year period from April 1, 2023 to March 31, 2028. The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies published and filed their business plans for the next price control period with Ofgem in December 2021 with final determinations published in November 2022. The remaining necessary step for this price control to be effective is the statutory modification of the license, which was published by Ofgem on February 3, 2023 and will become effective on April 1, 2023.

GWhs and percentages of electricity distributed to the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' end-users and the total number of end-users as of and for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
GWhs distributed:
Residential11,880 37 %13,334 39 %12,946 40 %
Commercial3,737 12 3,643 11 3,459 10 
Industrial16,239 50 16,424 49 15,917 49 
Other301 318 359 
32,157 100 %33,719 100 %32,681 100 %
Number of end-users (in thousands):3,953 3,941 3,934 

As of December 31, 2022, the combined electricity distribution network of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies included approximately 17,000 miles of overhead lines, 43,400 miles of underground cables and 810 major substations.

29


BHE PIPELINE GROUP (EASTERN ENERGY GAS AND EGTS)

The BHE Pipeline Group consists of BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas and Kern River, each an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. The BHE Pipeline Group operates approximately 21,200 miles of pipeline with a design capacity of approximately 21.1 Bcf of natural gas per day, transported approximately 15% of the total natural gas consumed in the U.S. during 2022 and owns assets in 27 states. The BHE Pipeline Group also operates 22 natural gas storage facilities with a total annualized increaseworking gas capacity of $135515.6 Bcf and an LNG export, import and storage facility.

The Pipeline Companies compete with other pipelines on the basis of cost, flexibility, reliability of service and overall customer service, with the customer's decision being made primarily on the basis of delivered price, which includes both the natural gas commodity cost and transportation costs. The Pipeline Companies also compete with midstream operators and gas marketers seeking to provide or arrange transportation, storage and other services to meet customer needs. Natural gas competes with alternative energy sources, including coal, nuclear energy, wind, geothermal, solar and fuel oil and the electricity generated from these alternative energy sources. The Pipeline Companies generate a substantial portion of their revenue from long-term firm contracts for transportation and storage services and are therefore insulated from competitive factors during the terms of the contracts. When these long-term contracts expire, the Pipeline Companies face competitive pressures from other natural gas pipeline facilities.

Subject to regulatory requirements, the Pipeline Companies attempt to recontract or remarket capacity at the maximum rates allowed under their tariffs, although at times the Pipeline Companies discount these rates to remain competitive. Historically, the Pipeline Companies have been able to provide competitively priced services because of access to a variety of relatively low cost supply basins, cost control measures and the relatively high level of firm entitlement that is sold on a seasonal and annual basis, which lowers the per unit cost of transportation. To date, the Pipeline Companies have avoided significant pipeline system bypasses.

BHE GT&S

BHE GT&S' operations, through its ownership of Eastern Energy Gas, includes three interstate natural gas pipeline systems, one of the nation's largest underground natural gas storage systems and one LNG export, import and storage facility. BHE GT&S' operations also include smaller LNG facilities, a field service company, and a gathering and processing company.

Eastern Energy Gas' principal subsidiaries are EGTS and Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC ("CGT"). EGTS' operations include natural gas transmission and storage pipelines located in Maryland, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. EGTS also operates one of the nation's largest underground natural gas storage systems located in New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. CGT's operations include an interstate natural gas pipeline system located in South Carolina and southeastern Georgia. Eastern Energy Gas also owns a 50% equity interest in Iroquois Gas Transmission System L.P. ("Iroquois"). Iroquois owns and operates an interstate natural gas pipeline located in the states of New York and Connecticut.

Eastern Energy Gas' LNG operations involve the export, import and storage of LNG at the Cove Point LNG Facility that is owned by Cove Point, located in Maryland, as well as the transmission of regasified LNG to the interstate pipeline grid and mid-Atlantic markets and the liquefaction of natural gas for export as LNG. Cove Point's LNG Facility has an operational peak regasification daily send-out capacity of approximately 1.8 million when fully implemented.Dth and an aggregate LNG storage capacity of approximately 14.6 billions of cubic feet equivalent ("Bcfe"). In addition, Cove Point has a small liquefier that has the potential to produce approximately 15,000 Dth/day. The Liquefaction Facility consists of one LNG train with a nameplate outlet capacity of 5.25 million tonnes per annum ("Mtpa"). Cove Point has authorization from the DOE to export up to 0.77 Bcfe/day (approximately 5.75 Mtpa) should the Liquefaction Facility perform better than expected. Cove Point's 36-inch diameter underground interstate natural gas pipelines are approximately 139 miles, with interconnections to Transcontinental Gas Pipeline, LLC in Fairfax County, Virginia, and with Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and EGTS in Loudoun County, Virginia. Eastern Energy Gas operates, as the general partner, and owns a 25% limited partnership interest in the Cove Point LNG export, import and storage facility. BHE GT&S also operates and has ownership interests in three smaller LNG facilities in Alabama, Florida and Pennsylvania.

In total, Eastern Energy Gas operates approximately 5,400 miles of natural gas transmission, gathering and storage pipelines, of which approximately 5,200 miles are owned by Eastern Energy Gas, with a design capacity of 12.6 Bcf per day as well as approximately 100 miles of natural gas liquids pipelines operated by BHE GT&S. EGTS operates approximately 3,900 miles of natural gas transmission and storage pipelines with a design capacity of 9.9 Bcf per day. EGTS also operates 17 underground storage fields with a total working gas capacity of approximately 420 Bcf, of which approximately 307 Bcf relates to natural gas storage field capacity that EGTS owns. BHE GT&S' pipeline system is configured with approximately 365 active receipt and delivery points. In 2022, BHE GT&S delivered over 2.0 trillion cubic feet ("Tcf") of natural gas to its customers.
30



BHE GT&S' natural gas transmission and storage earnings primarily result from rates established by FERC. Revenues derived from BHE GT&S' pipeline operations are primarily from reservation charges for firm transmission and storage services as provided for in their FERC-approved tariffs. Reservation charges are required to be paid regardless of volumes transported or stored. The profitability of these businesses is dependent on their ability, through the rates they are permitted to charge, to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on their capital investments. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 86% of BHE GT&S' transmission capacity is subscribed, including 81% under long-term contracts and 5% on a year-to-year basis, and approximately 97% of EGTS' storage capacity is subscribed with long-term contracts. As of December 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining contract term for Eastern Energy Gas' and EGTS' firm transmission contracts is seven years and six years, respectively, and EGTS' storage contracts is four years. Additionally, BHE GT&S receives revenue from firm fee-based contractual arrangements, including negotiated rates, for certain pipeline transmission and LNG storage and terminal services. Variability in BHE GT&S' earnings results from changes in operating and maintenance expenditures, as well as changes in rates and the demand for services, which are dependent on weather, changes in commodity prices and the economy.

BHE GT&S' operating revenue for the year ended December 31 was as follows (in millions):
20222021
Transmission$849 35 %$772 36 %
LNG790 33 704 32 
Storage316 13 251 12 
Gas, liquids and other sales447 19 433 20 
Total operating revenue$2,402 100 %$2,160 100 %

Except for quantities of natural gas owned and managed for operational and system balancing purposes, BHE GT&S does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system.

During 2022, BHE GT&S had two customers that each accounted for greater than 10% of its operating revenue and its 10 largest customers accounted for 45% of its total operating revenue. BHE GT&S has agreements with terms through 2038 to retain the majority of its two largest customers' volumes. The loss of any of these significant customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on BHE GT&S.

Human Capital

As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas had approximately 1,500 employees, consisting of approximately 1,200 natural gas operations employees and 300 corporate services employees. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 600 employees were covered by a union contract with the Utility Workers Union of America.

As of December 31, 2022, EGTS had approximately 1,300 employees, consisting of approximately 1,000 natural gas operations employees and 300 corporate services employees. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 600 employees were covered by a union contract with the Utility Workers Union of America.

For more information regarding Eastern Energy Gas' and EGTS' human capital disclosures, refer to Item 1. Business - General section of this Form 10-K.

31


Northern Natural Gas

Northern Natural Gas owns the largest interstate natural gas pipeline system in the U.S., as measured by pipeline miles, which reaches from west Texas to Michigan's Upper Peninsula. Northern Natural Gas primarily transports and stores natural gas for utilities, municipalities, gas marketing companies and industrial and commercial users. Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system consists of two commercial segments. Its traditional end-use and distribution market area in the northern part of its system, referred to as the Market Area, includes points in Iowa, Nebraska, Minnesota, Wisconsin, South Dakota, Michigan and Illinois. Its natural gas supply and delivery service area in the southern part of its system, referred to as the Field Area, includes points in Kansas, Texas, Oklahoma and New Mexico. The Market Area and Field Area are separated at a Demarcation Point ("Demarc"). Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system consists of 14,400 miles of natural gas pipelines, including 5,900 miles of mainline transmission pipelines and 8,500 miles of branch and lateral pipelines, with a Market Area design capacity of 6.3 Bcf per day, a Field Area delivery capacity of 1.7 Bcf per day to the Market Area and 1.4 Bcf per day to the West Texas area and 95.6 Bcf of working gas capacity in five storage facilities. Northern Natural Gas' pipeline system is configured with approximately 2,215 active receipt and delivery points which are integrated with the facilities of LDCs. Many of Northern Natural Gas' LDC customers are part of combined utilities that also use natural gas as a fuel source for electric generation. Northern Natural Gas delivered over 1.4 Tcf of natural gas to its customers in 2022.

Northern Natural Gas' transportation rates and most of its storage rates are cost-based. These rates are designed to provide Northern Natural Gas with an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and earn a reasonable return on its investments. Substantially all of Northern Natural Gas' Market Area transportation revenue is generated from reservation charges, with the balance from usage charges. Most of Northern Natural Gas' transportation capacity in the Market Area is committed to customers under firm transportation contracts, where customers pay Northern Natural Gas a monthly reservation charge for the right to transport natural gas through Northern Natural Gas' system. Reservation charges are required to be paid regardless of volumes transported or stored. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 74% of Northern Natural Gas' customers' entitlement in the Market Area have terms beyond 2024 and approximately 61% beyond 2026. As of December 31, 2022, the weighted average remaining contract term for Northern Natural Gas' Market Area firm transportation contracts is six years. Northern Natural Gas' Field Area customers consist primarily of energy marketing companies, midstream companies and power generators that are connected to Northern Natural Gas' system in Texas and New Mexico that are contracted on a long-term basis with a weighted average remaining contract term of five years. Northern Natural Gas' storage services are provided through the operation of one underground natural gas storage field in Iowa and two underground natural gas storage facilities in Kansas. Additionally, Northern Natural Gas has two LNG storage peaking units, one in Iowa and one in Minnesota, that support its transportation service. The three underground natural gas storage facilities and two LNG storage peaking units have a total working gas capacity of over 95.6 Bcf and over 2.2 Bcf per day of peak delivery capability. The average remaining contract term for firm storage contracts is five years.

Northern Natural Gas' operating revenue for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Transportation:
Market Area$688 66 %$658 61 %$633 65 %
Field Area210 22 177 17 226 24 
Total transportation898 88 835 78 859 89 
Storage97 94 91 
Total transportation and storage revenue995 97 929 87 950 98 
Gas, liquids and other sales28 143 13 18 
Total operating revenue$1,023 100 %$1,072 100 %$968 100 %

Except for quantities of natural gas owned and managed for operational and system balancing purposes, Northern Natural Gas does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system. The sale of natural gas for operational and system balancing purposes accounts for the majority of the remaining operating revenue.

During 2022, Northern Natural Gas had two customers that each accounted for greater than 10% of its transportation and storage revenue and its 10 largest customers accounted for 63% of its system-wide transportation and storage revenue. Northern Natural Gas has agreements with terms through 2027 and 2034 to retain the majority of its two largest customers' volumes. The loss of either of these significant customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on Northern Natural Gas.

32


Kern River

Kern River owns an interstate natural gas pipeline system that extends from supply areas in the Rocky Mountains to consuming markets in Utah, Nevada and California. Kern River operates 1,400 miles of mainline natural gas pipelines, with a year-round design capacity of 2,166,575 Dths, or 2.2 Bcf, per day. Additional seasonal design capacity (Bell-Curve) is contracted in all months except July, August and September. The mainline pipeline extends from the system's point of origination near Opal, Wyoming, through the Central Rocky Mountains to Daggett, California. The mainline section consists of 1,300 miles of 36-inch diameter pipeline and 100 miles of various laterals that connect to the mainline. Kern River primarily transports and stores natural gas for utilities, municipalities, gas marketing companies, industrial and commercial users.

Kern River's rates are designed to provide Kern River with an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and earn a reasonable return on its investments and are based on a levelized rate design with recovery of 70% of the original investment during the initial long-term contracts ("Period One rates"). After expiration of the initial term, eligible customers have the option to elect service at rates ("Period Two rates") that are lower than Period One rates because they are designed to recover the remaining 30% of the original investment. To the extent that eligible customers do not contract for service at Period Two rates, the volumes are turned back to Kern River, and it resells capacity at market rates for varying terms. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 87% of Kern River's design capacity, including seasonal bell curve, totaled 2,345,381 Dths per day and is contracted pursuant to long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements, whereby Kern River receives natural gas on behalf of customers at designated receipt points and transports the natural gas on a firm basis to designated delivery points. In return for this service, each customer pays Kern River a fixed monthly reservation fee based on each customer's maximum daily quantity, which represents nearly 81% of total operating revenue, and a commodity charge based on the actual amount of natural gas transported pursuant to its long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements and Kern River's tariff. These long-term firm natural gas transportation service agreements expire between February 2023 and October 2036 and have a weighted-average remaining contract term of over eight years. As of December 31, 2022, 74% of the year-round design capacity of 2,166,575 Dths under firm contract has primary delivery points in California, with the flexibility to access secondary delivery points in Nevada and Utah.

Except for quantities of natural gas owned for operational purposes, Kern River does not own the natural gas that is transported through its system. Kern River's transportation rates are cost-based.

During 2022, Kern River had two customers, including Nevada Power Company, an affiliated company, that each accounted for greater than 10% of its revenue. The loss of these significant customers, if not replaced, could have a material adverse effect on Kern River.

BHE TRANSMISSION

BHE Transmission consists of BHE Canada, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, BHE U.S. Transmission, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, ownership interests in generating facilities and 300 MWs of long-term northbound transmission rights on the Montana Alberta Tie Line (commencing April 30, 2026). BHE Canada and BHE U.S. Transmission together own and operate the Montana Alberta Tie Line, which is a 214-mile, 230-kV transmission line that runs from Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada to Great Falls, Montana, U.S. and connects power grids in the two jurisdictions.

BHE Canada

BHE Canada primarily owns AltaLink, a regulated electric transmission utility company headquartered in Alberta, Canada serving approximately 85% of Alberta's population. AltaLink's high voltage transmission lines and related facilities transmit electricity from generating facilities to major load centers, cities and large industrial plants throughout its 87,000 square mile service territory, which covers a diverse geographic area including most major urban centers in central and southern Alberta. AltaLink's transmission facilities, consisting of approximately 8,300 miles of transmission lines and approximately 310 substations as of December 31, 2022, are an integral part of the Alberta Interconnected Electric System ("AIES").

The AIES is a network or grid of transmission facilities operating at high voltages ranging from 69 kV to 500 kV. The grid delivers electricity from generating units across Alberta, Canada through approximately 16,000 miles of transmission lines. The AIES is interconnected to British Columbia's transmission system that links Alberta with the North American western interconnected system, interconnection with Saskatchewan's transmission system and interconnection with Montana's transmission system.

33


AltaLink is a transmission facility owner within the electricity industry in Alberta and is permitted to charge a tariff rate for the use of its transmission facilities. Such tariff rates are established on a cost-of-service regulatory model, which is designed to allow AltaLink an opportunity to recover its costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its investments. Transmission tariff rates are approved by the AUC and are collected from the AESO.

The electricity industry in Alberta consists of four principal segments. Generators sell wholesale power into the power pool operated by the AESO and through direct contractual arrangements. Alberta's transmission system or grid is composed of high voltage power lines and related facilities that transmit electricity from generating facilities to distribution networks and directly connected end-users. Distribution facility owners are regulated by the AUC and are responsible for arranging for, or providing, regulated rate and regulated default supply services to convey electricity from transmission systems and distribution-connected generators to end-use customers. Retailers can procure energy through the power pool, through direct contractual arrangements with energy suppliers or ownership of generation facilities and arrange for its distribution to end-use customers.

The AESO mandate is defined in the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) and its regulations and requires the AESO to assess both current and future needs of Alberta's interconnected electrical system. In January 2022, the AESO released the 2022 Long-term Transmission Plan. Updated every two years, the Long-Term Transmission Plan seeks to optimize the use of the existing transmission system and plan the development of new transmission to ensure a safe and reliable electricity system that enables a fair, efficient and openly competitive electricity market. The 2022 Long-Term Transmission Plan identifies C$1.3 billion in transmission projects over a 10 year period, which results in C$150 million to C$200 million per year on average over that 10 year period. This results in a cumulative transmission rate impact of C$2 per MWh for the first five to eight years, increasing to C$3 per MWh after 15 years. The Long-Term Transmission Plan identifies approximately C$900 million of projects in AltaLink's service territory with in-service dates before 2030.
BHE U.S. Transmission

BHE U.S. Transmission is engaged in various joint ventures to develop, own and operate transmission assets and is pursuing additional investment opportunities in the U.S. Currently, BHE U.S. Transmission has two joint ventures with transmission assets that are operational, ETT, a 50% owned joint venture with subsidiaries of American Electric Power Company, Inc. ("AEP"), and Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC, a 25% owned joint venture with AEP and Evergy, Inc. ETT owns and operates electric transmission assets in the ERCOT and, as of December 31, 2022, had total assets of $3.5 billion. ETT's transmission system includes approximately 1,900 miles of transmission lines and 42 substations as of December 31, 2022. Prairie Wind Transmission, LLC, owns and operates a 108-mile, 345-kV transmission project in Kansas having total assets of $133 million as of December 31, 2022.

Generating Facilities

BHE Transmission has ownership interests in the following generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:

PowerFacilityNet
PurchaseNetOwned
EnergyYearAgreementPowerCapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationSourceInstalledExpirationPurchaser
(MWs)(1)
(MWs)(1)
WIND:
RattlesnakeAlbertaWind20222042/2032Telus, RBC, Bullfrog, Shopify130 130 
Rim RockMontanaWind20122026Morgan Stanley189 189 
Glacier 1MontanaWind2008N/AN/A107 107 
Glacier 2MontanaWind2009N/AN/A103 103 
529 529 
NATURAL GAS:
Nat-1AlbertaNatural gas2015N/AN/A20 20 
20 20 
Total Available Generating Capacity549 549 
34


(1)    Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other     agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates BHE Transmission' ownership of Facility Net Capacity.

BHE RENEWABLES

The subsidiaries comprising the BHE Renewables reportable segment own interests in several independent power projects in the U.S. The following table presents certain information concerning these independent power projects as of December 31, 2022:
PowerFacilityNet
PurchaseNetOwned
EnergyYearAgreementPowerCapacityCapacity
Generating FacilityLocationSourceInstalledExpiration
Purchaser(1)
(MWs)(2)
(MWs)(2)
WIND:
Grande PrairieNebraskaWind20162036OPPD400 400 
Jumbo RoadTexasWind20152033AE300 300 
Santa RitaTexasWind20182025-2038KC, CODTX, MES300 300 
Mariah Del NorteTexasWind2016N/AN/A230 230 
Walnut RidgeIllinoisWind20182028USGSA212 212 
Flat TopTexasWind20192031Citi Commodities200 200 
Pinyon Pines ICaliforniaWind20122035SCE168 168 
Fluvanna IITexasWind20192024JP Morgan158 158 
Pinyon Pines IICaliforniaWind20122035SCE132 132 
Bishop Hill IIIllinoisWind20122032Ameren81 81 
MarshallKansasWind20162036MJMEC, KPP, KMEA & COIMO72 72 
IndependenceIowaWind20212041CIPCO54 54 
2,307 2,307 
SOLAR:
TopazCaliforniaSolar2013-20142039PG&E550 550 
Solar Star 1CaliforniaSolar2013-20152035SCE310 310 
Solar Star 2CaliforniaSolar2013-20152035SCE276 276 
Agua CalienteArizonaSolar2012-20132039PG&E290 142 
Alamo 6TexasSolar20172042CPS110 110 
Community Solar Gardens(5)
MinnesotaSolar2016-20182041-2043(4)98 98 
PearlTexasSolar20172042CPS50 50 
1,684 1,536 
NATURAL GAS:
CordovaIllinoisNatural Gas2001N/AN/A512 512 
Power ResourcesTexasNatural Gas1988N/AN/A212 212 
SaranacNew YorkNatural Gas1994N/AN/A245 196 
YumaArizonaNatural Gas19942024SDG&E50 50 
1,019 970 
GEOTHERMAL:
Imperial Valley ProjectsCaliforniaGeothermal1982-2000(3)(3)345 345 
345 345 
HYDROELECTRIC:
WailukuHawaiiHydroelectric19932023HELCO10 10 
10 10 
Total Available Generating Capacity5,365 5,168 

35


(1)San Diego Gas & Electric Company ("SDG&E"); Pacific Gas and Electric Company ("PG&E"), Ameren Illinois Company ("Ameren"), Southern California Edison ("SCE"), Hawaii Electric Light Company, Inc. ("HELCO"); Austin Energy ("AE"); Omaha Public Power District ("OPPD"); Kimberly-Clark Corporation ("KC"); City of Denton, TX ("CODTX"); MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC ("MES"); U.S. General Services Administration ("USGSA"); Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Commission ("MJMEC"); Kansas Power Pool ("KPP"); Kansas Municipal Energy Agency ("KMEA"); City of Independence, MO ("COIMO"); CPS Energy ("CPS"); and Central Iowa Power Cooperative ("CIPCO").
(2)Facility Net Capacity represents the lesser of nominal ratings or any limitations under applicable interconnection, power purchase, or other agreements for intermittent resources and the total net dependable capability available during summer conditions for all other units. An intermittent resource's nominal rating is the manufacturer's contractually specified capability (in MWs) under specified conditions. Net Owned Capacity indicates BHE Renewables' ownership of Facility Net Capacity.
(3)Approximately 12% of the Company's interests in the Imperial Valley Projects' Contract Capacity are currently sold to Southern California Edison Company under a long-term power purchase agreement expiring in 2026. Certain long-term power purchase agreement renewals for 252 MWs have been entered into with other parties at fixed prices that expire from 2028 to 2039, of which 202 MWs mature in 2039.
(4)The power purchasers are commercial, industrial and not-for-profit organizations.
(5)The community solar gardens project is consolidated in the table above for convenience as it consists of 98 distinct entities that each own an approximately 1-MW solar garden with independent but substantially similar terms and conditions.

BHE Renewables' operating revenue derived from the following business activities for the years ended December 31 were as follows (dollars in millions):
202220212020
Solar$477 48 %$468 48 %$455 48 %
Wind228 23 160 16 183 20 
Geothermal212 21 178 18 173 18 
Hydro32 26 
Natural gas71 143 15 99 11 
Total operating revenue$993 100 %$981 100 %$936 100 %

HOMESERVICES

HomeServices, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, is one of the largest residential real estate brokerage firms in the U.S. In addition to providing traditional residential real estate brokerage services, HomeServices offers other integrated real estate services, including mortgage originations and mortgage banking; title and closing services; property and casualty insurance; home warranties; relocation services; and other home-related services. HomeServices' real estate brokerage business is subject to seasonal fluctuations because more home sale transactions tend to close during the second and third quarters of the year. As a result, HomeServices' operating results and profitability are typically higher in the second and third quarters relative to the remainder of the year. HomeServices' owned brokerages currently operate in nearly 930 offices in 33 states and the District of Columbia with approximately 45,000 real estate agents under 55 brand names. The U.S. residential real estate brokerage business is subject to the general real estate market conditions, is highly competitive and consists of numerous local brokers and agents in each market seeking to represent sellers and buyers in residential real estate transactions.

HomeServices' franchise network currently includes approximately 300 franchisees and over 1,500 brokerage offices with nearly 51,000 real estate agents under two brand names, primarily in the U.S. In exchange for certain fees, HomeServices provides the right to use the Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices or Real Living brand names and other related service marks, as well as providing orientation programs, training and consultation services, advertising programs and other services.

GENERAL REGULATION

BHE's regulated subsidiaries and certain affiliates are subject to comprehensive governmental regulation, which significantly influences their operating environment, prices charged to customers, capital structure, costs and, ultimately, their ability to recover costs and earn a reasonable return on invested capital. In addition to the discussion contained herein regarding general regulation, refer to "Regulatory Matters" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding certain regulatory matters.

Domestic Regulated Public Utility Subsidiaries

The Utilities are subject to comprehensive regulation by various state, federal and local agencies. The more significant aspects of this regulatory framework are described below.

36


State Regulation

Historically, state regulatory commissions have established retail electric and natural gas rates on a cost-of-service basis, which are designed to allow a utility the opportunity to recover what each state regulatory commission deems to be the utility's reasonable costs of providing services, including a fair opportunity to earn a reasonable return on its investments based on its cost of debt and equity. In addition to return on investment, a utility's cost of service generally reflects a representative level of prudent expenses, including cost of sales, operating expense, depreciation and amortization and income and other tax expense, reduced by wholesale electricity and other revenue. The allowed operating expenses are typically based on actual historical costs adjusted for known and measurable or forecasted changes. State regulatory commissions may adjust cost of service for various reasons, including pursuant to a review of: (a) the utility's revenue and expenses during a defined test period, (b) the utility's level of investment and (c) changes in income tax laws. State regulatory commissions typically have the authority to review and change rates on their own initiative; however, they may also initiate reviews at the request of a utility, utility customers or organizations representing groups of customers. In certain jurisdictions, the utility and such parties, however, may agree with one another not to request a review of or changes to rates for a specified period of time.

The retail electric rates of the Utilities are generally based on the cost of providing traditional bundled services, including generation, transmission and distribution services. The Utilities have established ECAMs and other cost recovery mechanisms in certain states, which help mitigate their exposure to changes in costs from those assumed in establishing base rates.

With certain limited exceptions, the Utilities have an increaseexclusive right to serve retail customers within their service territories and, in turn, have an obligation to provide service to those customers. In some jurisdictions, certain classes of customers may choose to purchase all or a portion of their energy from alternative energy suppliers, and in some jurisdictions retail customers can generate all or a portion of their own energy. Under Oregon law, PacifiCorp has the exclusive right and obligation to provide electricity distribution services to all residential and nonresidential customers within its allocated service territory; however, nonresidential customers have the right to choose an alternative provider of energy supply. The impact of this right on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results has not been material. In Washington, state law does not provide for exclusive service territory allocation. PacifiCorp's service territory in Washington is surrounded by other public utilities with whom PacifiCorp has from time to time entered into service area agreements under the jurisdiction of the WUTC. Under California law, PacifiCorp has the exclusive right and obligation to provide electricity distribution services to all residential and nonresidential customers within its allocated service territory; however, cities, counties and certain other public agencies have the right to choose to generate energy supply or elect an alternative provider of energy supply through the formation of a Community Choice Aggregator ("CCA"). To date, no CCA activity has occurred in PacifiCorp's California service territory. If a CCA is formed, PacifiCorp would continue to provide CCA customers transmission, distribution, metering and billing services and the CCA would provide generation supply. In addition, PacifiCorp would likely be able to collect costs from CCA customers for the generation-related costs that PacifiCorp incurred while they were customers of PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp would remain the electricity provider of last resort for these customers. In Illinois, state law has established a competitive environment so that all Illinois customers are free to choose their retail service supplier. For customers that choose an alternative retail energy supplier, MidAmerican Energy continues to have an ongoing obligation to deliver the supplier's energy to the retail customer. MidAmerican Energy bills the retail customer for such delivery services. MidAmerican Energy also has an obligation to serve customers at regulated cost-based rates and has a continuing obligation to serve customers who have not selected a competitive electricity provider. The impact of this right on MidAmerican Energy's financial results has not been material. In Nevada, Chapter 704B of the Nevada Revised Statutes allows retail electric customers with an average annual load of one MW or more to file a letter of intent and application with the PUCN to acquire electric energy and ancillary services from another energy supplier. The law requires customers wishing to choose a new supplier to receive the approval of the PUCN to meet public interest standards. In particular, departing customers must secure new energy resources that are not under contract to the Nevada Utilities, the departure must not burden the Nevada Utilities with increased costs or cause any remaining customers to pay increased costs and the departing customers must pay their portion of any deferred energy balances, all as determined by the PUCN. SB 547 revised Chapter 704B to establish limits on the amount of load eligible to take service under Chapter 704B and to set those limits as a part of the IRP filed by the Nevada Utilities. Also, the Utilities and the state regulatory commissions are individually evaluating how best to integrate private generation resources into their service and rate design, including considering such factors as maintaining high levels of customer safety and service reliability, minimizing adverse cost impacts and fairly allocating costs among all customers.

In Nevada, large natural gas customers using 12,000 therms per month with fuel switching capability are allowed to participate in the incentive natural gas rate tariff. Once a service agreement has been executed, a customer can compare natural gas prices under this tariff to alternative energy sources and choose its source of natural gas. In addition, natural gas customers using greater than 1,000 therms per day have the ability to secure their own natural gas supplies under the gas transportation tariff.

37


PacifiCorp

Rate Filings

Under Utah law, the UPSC must issue a written order within 240 days of a public utility's application for a general rate change. Absent an order, the proposed rates go into effect as filed and are not subject to refund, the UPSC may allow interim rates to take effect within 45 days of an application, subject to refund or surcharge, if an adequate prima facie showing is established in hearing that the interim rate change is justified.

In Oregon, the OPUC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates for a period not to exceed more than six months, with an additional three-month extension, beyond the 30-day time period when the new rates would otherwise go into effect. Absent suspension or other action from the OPUC, new rates automatically go into effect 30 days from filing by the utility. Upon suspension by the OPUC, the OPUC is authorized to allow the collection of an interim rate, subject to refund, during the pendency of the OPUC's review of the rate request.

In Wyoming, the WPSC can allow interim rates to go into effect 30 days after the initial application but may require a bond to secure a refund for the amount. The WPSC may suspend the rates for final approval for a period not to exceed 10 months.

In Washington, the WUTC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed 10 months beyond the 30-day time period when the new rate would otherwise go into effect.
Under Idaho law, the IPUC can suspend a filing for an initial period not to exceed five months and an additional extension of 60 days with a showing of good cause.

In California, the CPUC has the authority to suspend proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed 18 months. The CPUC may extend the suspension period on a case-by-case basis.

Adjustment Mechanisms

In addition to recovery through base rates, PacifiCorp also achieves recovery of certain costs through various adjustment mechanisms as summarized below.
State RegulatorBase Rate Test PeriodAdjustment Mechanism
UPSC
Forecasted or historical with known and measurable changes(1)
EBA under which 100% of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. Wheeling revenue is also included in the mechanism. Beginning in 2021, the mechanism includes a true-up of PTCs at 100%.
Balancing account to provide for 100% recovery or refund of the difference between the level of REC revenues included in base rates and actual REC revenues after adjusting for a REC incentive authorized by the UPSC.
Recovery mechanism for single capital investments that in total exceed 1% of existing rate base when a general rate case has occurred within the preceding 18 months.
Effective January 1, 2021, Wildland Fire Mitigation Balancing Account to recover operating expenses and capital expenditures incurred to implement PacifiCorp's Utah Wildland Fire Protection Plan incremental to those included in base rates.
OPUCForecastedPCAM under which 90% of the difference between forecasted net variable power costs and PTCs established under the annual TAM and actual net variable power costs and PTCs is deferred and reflected in future rates. The difference between the forecasted and actual net variable power costs and PTCs must fall outside of an established asymmetrical deadband, with a negative annual power cost variance deadband of $15 million; and a positive annual power cost variance deadband of $30 million and is subject to an earnings test of +/- 1% on PacifiCorp's allowed return on equity.
Annual TAM based on forecasted net variable power costs and PTCs.
RAC to recover the revenue requirement of new renewable resources and associated transmission costs that are not reflected in general rates.
Balancing account for recovery of costs associated with the purchase of RECs necessary to meet Oregon's RPS requirements.
Effective January 1, 2021, Annual Wildfire Mitigation and Vegetation Management Cost Recovery Mechanism approved through 2024 to recover vegetation management and wildfire mitigation operations and maintenance costs and wildfire mitigation capital costs, incremental to those included in base rates. Recovery is subject to performance metrics and earnings tests. After 2024, the mechanism will be assessed to determine whether continued use is warranted.
38


WPSC
Forecasted or historical with known and measurable changes(1)
ECAM under which 80% of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. Within the mechanism, chemical costs and start-up fuel costs are also included at the 80% symmetrical sharing band and PTCs are included at 100% symmetrical sharing.
REC and SO2 revenue adjustment mechanism to provide for recovery or refund of 100% of any difference between actual REC and SO2 revenues and the level in rates.
WUTCHistorical with known and measurable changesPCAM under which the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates after applying a $4 million deadband for positive or negative net power cost variances. For net power cost variances between $4 million and $10 million, amounts to be recovered from customers are allocated 50/50 and amounts to be credited to customers are allocated 75/25 (customers/PacifiCorp). Positive or negative net power cost variances in excess of $10 million are allocated 90/10 (customers/PacifiCorp). Beginning in 2021, the mechanism includes a true-up of PTCs at 100%.
Deferral mechanism of costs for up to 24 months of new base load generation resources and eligible renewable resources and related transmission that qualify under the state's emissions performance standard and are not reflected in base rates.
REC revenue tracking mechanism to provide credit of 100% of REC revenues to customers.
Decoupling mechanism under which the difference between actual annual revenues and authorized revenues per customer per specified rate schedules is deferred and reflected in future rates, subject to an earnings test. Under the earnings test, 50% of any proportional excess earnings over PacifiCorp's authorized return on equity is returned to customers in addition to any surcharge or surcredit related to the revenue variance. The earnings test is asymmetrical, and adjustments are not made when PacifiCorp earns at or below authorized returns on equity. To trigger a rate adjustment, the deferral balance must exceed plus or minus 2.5% of the authorized revenue at the end of each deferral period by rate class. Rate adjustments must not exceed a surcharge of 5% of the actual normalized revenue by class.
IPUCHistorical with known and measurable changesECAM under which 90% of the difference between base net power costs set during a general rate case and actual net power costs is deferred and reflected in future rates. Also provides for recovery or refund of 100% of the difference between the level of REC revenues included in base rates and actual REC revenues and differences in actual PTCs compared to the amount in base rates.
CPUCForecastedPTAM for major capital additions that allows for rate adjustments outside of the context of a traditional general rate case for the revenue requirement associated with capital additions exceeding $50 million on a total-company basis. Filed as eligible capital additions are placed into service.
ECAC that allows for an annual update to actual and forecasted net power costs.
PTAM for attrition, a mechanism that allows for an annual adjustment to costs other than net power costs.
Catastrophic Events Memorandum Account for catastrophic events, allows for deferral and cost recovery of reasonable costs incurred as the result of catastrophic events, which are events for which a state or federal agency has declared a state of emergency.
Fire Risk Mitigation Memorandum Account to track costs related to wildfire mitigation activities incremental to what is in base rates and Wildfire Mitigation Plan Memorandum Account to track costs associated with the implementation of PacifiCorp's approved wildfire mitigation plan.

(1)PacifiCorp has relied on both historical test periods with known and measurable adjustments, as well as forecasted test periods.

MidAmerican Energy

Rate Filings

Under Iowa law, a utility may implement temporary rates, without IUB review and subject to refund, on or after 10 days of filing a request for higher base rates. If the IUB has not issued a final order approved, among other items,within 10 months after the filing date, the temporary rates become final. Under Illinois law, new base rates may become effective 45 days after the filing of a request with the ICC, or earlier with ICC approval. The ICC has authority to suspend the proposed new rates, subject to hearing, for a period not to exceed approximately 11 months after filing. South Dakota law authorizes the SDPUC to suspend new base rates for up to six months during the pendency of rate proceedings; however, a utility may implement all or a portion of the proposed new rates six months after the filing of a request for a rate increase subject to refund pending a final order in the proceeding.

39


Iowa law also permits rate-regulated utilities to seek ratemaking principles with the IUB prior to the construction of certain types of new generating facilities. Pursuant to this law, MidAmerican Energy has applied for and obtained IUB ratemaking principles orders for a 484-MW (MidAmerican Energy's share) coal-fueled generating facility, a 495-MW combined cycle natural gas-fueled generating facility and 6,639 MWs (nominal ratings) of wind-powered generating facilities as of December 31, 2022. These ratemaking principles established cost caps for the projects, below which such costs are deemed prudent by the IUB and authorized a fixed rate of return on equity for the respective generating facilities over the regulatory life of the facilities in any future Iowa rate proceeding. As of December 31, 2022, the generating facilities in-service totaled $7.6 billion, or 36%, of MidAmerican Energy's regulated property, plant and equipment, net and were subject to these ratemaking principles at a weighted average return on equity of 11.4% with a weighted average remaining life of 32 years.

Ratemaking principles for several wind-powered generation projects have established mechanisms in Iowa where electric rate base may be reduced. The current revenue sharing mechanism that sharesis in accordance with MidAmerican Energy's customers 80% of revenues related to equity returns above 11%Wind XII ratemaking principles and 100% of revenues related to equity returns above 14%, with the customer portion of any sharing reducing rate base. MidAmerican Energy recorded a regulatory liability for revenue sharing totaling $26 million in 2017 and $30 million in 2016, which reducedreduces rate base in the respective following January. In August 2016, the IUB issuedfor Iowa electric returns on equity exceeding an order approving ratemaking principles related to MidAmerican Energy's construction of up to 2,000 MW (nominal ratings) of additional wind-powered generating facilities. The ratemaking principles modified the revenue sharing mechanism, effective in 2018, such that sharing will beestablished benchmark. Sharing is triggered each year by MidAmerican Energy's actual equity returnsreturn being above a threshold calculated annually in accordance with the order.annually. The threshold, not to exceed 11%, is the weighted average of equity returns forreturn of rate base aswith returns authorized via ratemaking principles proceedings and for remainingall other rate base. For all other rate base, the return is based on interest rates on 30-year single A-rated utility bond yields plus 400 basis points, with a minimum return of 9.5%. Pursuant to the change in revenue sharing, MidAmerican Energy will shareshares with customers 100%90% of the revenue in excess of thisthe trigger. Such revenue sharing will reduceA second mechanism, the retail customer benefit mechanism, reduces electric rate base for the value of higher cost retail energy displaced by covered wind-powered production and applies to the wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in 2016 under the Wind X project and facilities constructed under the Wind XII project approved by the IUB in 2018. Rate base reductions under these mechanisms are applied to coal and nuclearother generation ratefacilities in specified orders.

Adjustment Mechanisms

Under its current Iowa, Illinois and South Dakota electric tariffs, MidAmerican Energy is allowed to recover fluctuations in electric energy costs for its retail electric sales through fuel, or energy, cost adjustment mechanisms. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has transmission adjustment clauses to recover certain transmission charges related to retail customers in all jurisdictions. The transmission adjustment mechanisms recover costs billed by the MISO for regional transmission service. The Illinois adjustment mechanism additionally recovers MidAmerican Energy's entire transmission revenue requirement attributable to Illinois. The adjustment mechanisms reduce the regulatory lag for the recovery of energy and transmission costs related to retail electric customers in these jurisdictions and accomplish, with limited timing differences, a pass-through of the related costs to these customers. Recoveries through these adjustment mechanisms are reflected in operating revenue, and the related costs are reflected in cost of fuel and energy or operations and maintenance expense, as applicable.

Of the wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service as of December 31, 2022, 5,022 MWs (nominal ratings) have not been included in the determination of MidAmerican Energy's Iowa retail electric base rates. In accordance with related ratemaking principles, until such time as these generation assets are reflected in base rates and ceasing thereafter, MidAmerican Energy will continue to reduce its revenue from Iowa EAC recoveries by $12 million each calendar year.

MidAmerican Energy's cost of natural gas purchased for resale is collected for each jurisdiction through a uniform PGA, which is intendedupdated monthly to mitigate future base rate increases.reflect changes in actual costs. Subject to prudence reviews, the PGA accomplishes a pass-through of MidAmerican Energy's cost of natural gas purchased for resale to its customers and, accordingly, has no direct effect on net income.



MidAmerican Energy's electric and natural gas energy efficiency program costs are collected through bill riders that are adjusted annually based on actual and expected costs in accordance with the energy efficiency plans filed with and approved by the respective state regulatory commission. As such, the energy efficiency program costs, which are reflected in operations and maintenance expense, and related recoveries, which are reflected in operating revenue, have no direct impact on net income.
The
40


MidAmerican Energy has income tax rider mechanisms in Iowa and Illinois that were established in response to 2017 Tax Reform, which enacted significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, including, among other things, a reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. MidAmerican Energy has made filings or has beenSouth Dakota implemented changes to base rates in discussions with eachresponse to 2017 Tax Reform. As a result of its state rate regulatory bodies proposing either a reduction in retail rates or rate base for all or a portion of the net benefits of the 2017 Tax Reform, for 2018 and beyond. MidAmerican Energy has proposedre-measured its accumulated deferred income tax balances at the 21% rate and increased regulatory liabilities pursuant to the approved mechanisms. In December 2018, the IUB approved in Iowa, its largest jurisdiction, to reducefinal form a tax expense revision mechanism that reduces customer revenue via a rider mechanismelectric rates for 50%the impact of the lower annual income tax expense resultingrate on current operations, as calculated annually, and defers the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes created by their re-measurement at the 21% income tax rate to a regulatory liability, the disposition of which will be determined in MidAmerican Energy's next rate case. In 2018, Iowa Senate File 2417 was signed into law, which, among other items, reduced the state of Iowa corporate tax rate from 12% to 9.8% effective in 2021, at which time, the decreaseimpacts of Iowa Senate File 2417 began to be included in federal tax rates, updated annually. Results for the Iowa electric jurisdiction will be subject to Iowa revenue sharing provisions. If MidAmerican Energy's filings in each of its rate jurisdictions are approved as proposed, it is estimated that 2018 revenue will be reduced by approximately $72 million, subject to change depending upon actual results of operations. MidAmerican Energy cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of regulatory actions on its proposals.tax expense revision mechanism.


NV Energy (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific)


Regulatory Rate ReviewsFilings


In June 2017, Nevada Power filed anstatutes require the Nevada Utilities to file electric regulatorygeneral rate reviewcases once every three years with the PUCN. Sierra Pacific may also file natural gas general rate cases with the PUCN. The filing supportedNevada Utilities are also subject to a two-part fuel and purchased power adjustment mechanism. The Nevada Utilities make quarterly filings to reset the BTERs, based on the last 12 months of fuel and purchased power costs. The difference between actual fuel and purchased power costs and the revenue collected in the BTERs is deferred into a balancing account. The DEAA rate clears amounts deferred into the balancing account. Nevada regulations allow an electric or natural gas utility that adjusts its BTERs on a quarterly basis to request PUCN approval to make quarterly changes to its DEAA rate if the request is in the public interest. During required annual DEAA proceedings, the prudence of fuel and purchased power costs is reviewed, and if any costs are disallowed on such grounds, the disallowances will be incorporated into the next quarterly BTERs change. Also, on an annual revenue increase of $29 million, or 2%, but requested no incremental annual revenue relief. In December 2017, the PUCN issued an order which reduced Nevada Power's revenue requirement by $26 million and requires Nevada Power to share 50% of revenues related to equity returns above 9.7%. As a result of the order, Nevada Power recorded expense of $28 million primarily due to the reduction of a regulatory asset to return to customers revenue collected for costs not incurred. In January 2018, Nevada Power filed a petition for clarification of certain findings and directives in the order. The new rates were effective in February 2018.

The 2017 Tax Reform enacted significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, including, among other things, a reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. In February 2018,basis, the Nevada Utilities made filings with(a) seek a determination that energy efficiency program expenditures were reasonable, (b) request that the PUCN proposing a tax rate reduction rider for the lower annual income tax expense anticipated to result from the 2017 Tax Reform for 2018reset base and beyond. The filings support an annual rate reduction of $59 millionamortization EEPR, and $25 million for Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, respectively. The Nevada Utilities cannot predict the timing or ultimate outcome of regulatory actions on its proposals.

In June 2016, Sierra Pacific filed an electric regulatory rate review with the PUCN. The filing requested no incremental annual revenue relief. In October 2016, Sierra Pacific filed with(c) request that the PUCN a settlement agreement resolving most, but not all, issues in the proceedingreset base and reduced Sierra Pacific's electric revenue requirement by $3 million spread evenly to all rate classes. In December 2016, the PUCN approved the settlement agreement and established an additional six MW of net metering capacity under the grandfathered rates, which are those net metering rates that were in effect prior to January 2016; the order establishes cost-based rates and a value-based excess energy credit for customers who choose to install private generation after the six MW limitation is reached. The new rates were effective January 1, 2017. In January 2017, Sierra Pacific filed a petition for reconsideration relating to the creation of the additional six MW of net metering at the grandfathered rates. Sierra Pacific believes the effects of the PUCN decision results in additional cost shifting to non-net metering customers and reduces the stipulated rate reduction for other customer classes. In June 2017, the PUCN denied the petition for reconsideration.amortization EEIR.


In June 2016, Sierra Pacific filed a gas regulatory rate review with the PUCN. The filing requested a slight decrease in its incremental annual revenue requirement. In October 2016, Sierra Pacific filed with the PUCN a settlement agreement resolving all issues in the proceeding and reduced Sierra Pacific's gas revenue requirement by $2 million. In December 2016, the PUCN approved the settlement agreement. The new rates were effective January 1, 2017.

EEPR and EEIR


EEPR was established to allow the Nevada Utilities to recover the costs of implementing energy efficiency programs and EEIR was established to offset the negative impacts on revenue associated with the successful implementation of energy efficiency programs. These rates change once a year in the utility's annual DEAA application based on energy efficiency program budgets prepared by the Nevada Utilities and approved by the PUCN in integrated resource planthe IRP proceedings. To the extentWhen the Nevada Utilities' regulatory earned rate of return for a calendar year exceeds the regulatory rate of return used to set base tariff general rates, the Nevada Utilities'they are requiredobligated to refund to customers EEIRenergy efficiency implementation revenue previously collected for that year. In March 2017, the Nevada Utilities each filed an application to reset the EEIR and EEPR and refund the EEIR revenue received in 2016, including carrying charges. In September 2017, the PUCN issued an order accepting a stipulation requiring Nevada Power to refund the 2016 revenue and reset the rates as filed effective October 1, 2017. The current EEIR liability for Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific is $10 million and $1 million, respectively, which is included in current regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017.



Chapter 704B Applications

Chapter 704B of the Nevada Revised Statutes allows retail electric customers with an average annual load of one MW or more to file with the PUCN an application to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become distribution only service customers. On a case-by-case basis, the PUCN will assess the application and may deny or grant the application subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee, paying on-going charges and receiving approval for specific alternative energy providers and terms. The impact fee and on-going charges are assessed to alleviate the burden on other Nevada customers for the applicant's share of previously committed investments and long-term renewable contracts and are set at a level designed such that the remaining customers are not subjected to increased costs.

In May 2015, MGM Resorts International ("MGM") and Wynn Las Vegas, LLC ("Wynn"), filed applications with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become distribution only service customers of Nevada
Power. In December 2015, the PUCN granted the applications subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee, on-going charges and receiving approval for specific alternative energy providers and terms. In December 2015, the applicants filed petitions for reconsideration. In January 2016, the PUCN granted reconsideration and updated some of the terms, including removing a limitation related to energy purchased indirectly from NV Energy. In September 2016, MGM and Wynn paid impact fees of $82 million and $15 million, respectively. In October 2016, MGM and Wynn became distribution only service customers and started procuring energy from another energy supplier. In April 2017, Wynn filed a motion with the PUCN seeking relief from the January 2016 order and requested the PUCN adopt an alternative impact fee and revise on-going charges associated with retirement of assets and high cost renewable contracts. This request is still pending. In May 2017, a stipulation reached between MGM, Regulatory Operations Staff and the Bureau of Consumer Protection was filed requiring Nevada Power to reduce the original $82 million impact fee by $16 million and apply the credit against MGM's remaining on-going charge obligation. In June 2017, the PUCN approved the stipulation as filed.

In September 2016, Switch, Ltd. ("Switch"), a customer of the Nevada Utilities, filed an application with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become a distribution only service customer of Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. In December 2016, the PUCN approved a stipulation agreement that allows Switch to purchase energy from alternative providers subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee to Nevada Power. In May 2017, Switch paid impact fees of $27 million and, in June 2017, Switch became a distribution only service customer and started procuring energy from another energy supplier.

In November 2016, Caesars Enterprise Service ("Caesars"), a customer of the Nevada Utilities, filed an application with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become a distribution only service customer of Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. In March 2017, the PUCN approved the application allowing Caesars to purchase energy from alternative providers subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee. In March 2017, Caesars provided notice that it intends to pay the impact fee monthly for three and six years at Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power, respectively, and proceed with purchasing energy from alternative providers. In July 2017, Caesars made the required compliance filings and, in September 2017, the PUCN issued an order allowing Caesars to acquire electric energy and ancillary services from another energy supplier and become a distribution only service customer of the Nevada Utilities. In December 2017, Caesars provided notice that it intends to transition eligible meters in the Nevada Power service territory to unbundled electric service in February 2018 at the earliest. In January 2018, Caesars became a distribution only service customer and started procuring energy from another energy supplier for its eligible meters in the Sierra Pacific service territory.

In May 2017, Peppermill Resort Spa Casino ("Peppermill"), a customer of Sierra Pacific, filed an application with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become a distribution only service customer of Sierra Pacific. In August 2017, the PUCN approved a stipulation allowing Peppermill to purchase energy from alternative providers subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee. In September 2017, Peppermill provided notice that it intends to pay the impact fee and proceed with purchasing energy from alternative providers.


Net Metering

Nevada enacted Senate Bill 374 ("SB 374") on June 5, 2015. The legislation required the Nevada Utilities to prepare cost-of-service studies and propose new rules and rates for customers who install private, renewable generating resources. In July 2015, the Nevada Utilities made filings in compliance with SB 374 and the PUCN issued final orders December 23, 2015.

The final orders issued by the PUCN established separate rate classes for customers who install private, renewable generating facilities. The establishment of separate rate classes recognizes the unique characteristics, costs and services received by these partial requirements customers. The PUCN also established new, cost-based rates or prices for these new customer classes, including increases in the basic service charge and related reductions in energy charges. Additionally, the PUCN established a separate value for compensating customers who produce and deliver excess energy to the Nevada Utilities. The valuation considered eleven factors, including alternatives available to the Nevada Utilities. The PUCN established a gradual, five-step process for transition over four years to the new, cost-based rates.

In January 2016, the PUCN denied requests to stay the order issued December 23, 2015. The PUCN also voted to reopen the evidentiary proceeding to address the application of new net metering rules for customers who applied for net metering service before the issuance of the final order. In February 2016, the PUCN affirmed most of the provisions of the December 23, 2015 order and adopted a twelve-year transition plan for changing rates for net metering customers to cost-based rates for utility services and value-based pricing for excess energy. Subsequently, two solar industry interest groups filed petitions for judicial review of the PUCN order issued in February 2016. The petitions request that the court either modify the PUCN order or direct the PUCN to modify its decision in a manner that would maintain rates and rules of service applicable to net metering as existed prior to the December 23, 2015 order of the PUCN. Two of the three petitions filed by the solar industry interest groups have been dismissed. In September 2016, the state district court issued an order in the third petition. The court concluded that the PUCN failed to provide existing net metering customers adequate legal notice of the proceeding. The court affirmed the PUCN's decision to establish new net energy metering rates and apply those to new net metering customers. The Nevada state district court decision was appealed to the Nevada Supreme Court, which was settled and dismissed in August 2017.

In July 2016, the Nevada Utilities filed applications with the PUCN to revert back to the original net metering rates for a period of twenty years for customers who installed or had an active application for private, renewable generating facilities as of December 31, 2015. In September 2016, the PUCN issued an order accepting the stipulation and approved the applications as modified by the stipulation. In December 2016, as a part of Sierra Pacific's regulatory rate review, the PUCN issued an order establishing an additional six MWs of net metering under the grandfathered rates in the Sierra Pacific service territory. As mentioned above, Sierra Pacific filed a petition for reconsideration relating to the additional six MWs of net metering, which was denied in June 2017.


Nevada enacted Assembly Bill 405 ("AB 405") on June 15, 2017. The legislation, among other things, established net metering crediting rates for private generation customers with installed net metering systems less than 25 kilowatts. Under AB 405, private generation customers will be compensated for excess energy on a monthly basis at 95% of the rate the customer would have paid for a kilowatt-hour of electricity supplied by the Nevada Utilities for the first 80 MWs of cumulative installed capacity of all net metering systems in Nevada, 88% of the rate the customer would have paid for a kilowatt-hour of electricity supplied by the Nevada Utilities for the next 80 MWs, of cumulative installed capacity in Nevada, 81% of the rate the customer would have paid for a kilowatt-hour of electricity supplied by the Nevada Utilities for the next 80 MWs of cumulative installed capacity in Nevada and 75% of the rate the customer would have paid for a kilowatt-hour of electricity supplied by the Nevada Utilities for any additional private generation capacity. As of December 31, 2022, the cumulative installed and applied-for capacity of net metering systems under AB 405 in Nevada was 583 MWs.

            Natural Disaster Protection Plan ("NDPP")

SB 329, Natural Disaster Mitigation Measures, was signed into law on May 22, 2019. The legislation requires the Nevada Utilities to submit a NDPP to the PUCN. The PUCN adopted NDPP regulations on January 29, 2020, that require the Nevada Utilities to file their NDPP for approval on or before March 1 of every third year. The regulations also require annual updates to be filed on or before September 1 of the second and third years of the plan. The plan must include procedures, protocols and other certain information as it relates to the efforts of the Nevada Utilities to prevent or respond to a fire or other natural disaster. The expenditures incurred by the Nevada Utilities in developing and implementing the NDPP are required to be held in a regulatory asset account, with the Nevada Utilities filing an application for recovery on or before March 1 of each year. The PUCN reopened its investigation and rulemaking on SB 329 and the comment period for the reopened investigation ended in early February 2021. Final regulations are pending.

41


Federal Regulation

The FERC is an independent agency with broad authority to implement provisions of the Federal Power Act, the Natural Gas Act ("NGA"), the Energy Policy Act of 2005 ("Energy Policy Act") and other federal statutes. The FERC regulates rates for wholesale sales of electricity; transmission of electricity, including pricing and regional planning for the expansion of transmission systems; electric system reliability; utility holding companies; accounting and records retention; securities issuances; construction and operation of hydroelectric facilities; and other matters. The FERC also has the enforcement authority to assess civil penalties of up to $1.5 million per day per violation of rules, regulations and orders issued under the Federal Power Act. The Utilities have implemented programs and procedures that facilitate and monitor compliance with the FERC's regulations described below. MidAmerican Energy is also subject to regulation by the NRC pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended ("Atomic Energy Act"), with respect to its ownership interest in the Quad Cities Station.

Wholesale Electricity and Capacity

The FERC regulates the Utilities' rates charged to wholesale customers for electricityand transmission capacity and related services. Much of the Utilities' wholesale electricity sales and purchases occur under market-based pricing allowed by the FERC and are therefore subject to market volatility. The Utilities are precluded from selling at market-based rates in the PacifiCorp-East, PacifiCorp-West, Nevada Utilities, Idaho Power Company and NorthWestern Energy balancing authority areas. Wholesale electricity sales in those specific balancing authority areas are permitted at cost-based rates. PacifiCorp and the Nevada Utilities have been granted the authority to bid into the California EIM at market-based rates.

The Utilities' authority to sell electricity in wholesale electricity markets at market-based rates is subject to triennial reviews conducted by the FERC. Accordingly, the Utilities are required to submit triennial filings to the FERC that demonstrate a lack of market power over sales of wholesale electricity and electric generation capacity in their respective market areas. PacifiCorp, the Nevada Utilities and certain affiliates, representing the BHE Northwest Companies, file together for market power study purposes. The BHE Northwest Companies' most recent triennial filing was made in June 2022 and is under review by the FERC. MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Northeast Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Northeast Region was made in June 2020 and an order accepting it was issued in December 2020. MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Central Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Central Region was made in December 2020 and an order accepting it was issued in March 2022. Under the FERC's market-based rules, the Utilities must also file with the FERC a notice of change in status when there is a change in the conditions that the FERC relied upon in granting market-based rate authority. MidAmerican Energy most recently filed a notice of non-material change in status in July 2022, and the filing is currently under review by the FERC.

Transmission

PacifiCorp's and the Nevada Utilities' wholesale transmission services are regulated by the FERC under cost-based regulation subject to PacifiCorp's and the Nevada Utilities' OATTs. These services are offered on a non-discriminatory basis, which means that all potential customers are provided an equal opportunity to access the transmission system. PacifiCorp's and the Nevada Utilities' transmission business is managed and operated independently from its wholesale marketing business in accordance with the FERC's Standards of Conduct. PacifiCorp and the Nevada Utilities have made several required compliance filings in accordance with these rules.

In December 2011, PacifiCorp adopted a cost-based formula rate under its OATT for its transmission services. Cost-based formula rates are intended to be an effective means of recovering PacifiCorp's investments and associated costs of its transmission system without the need to file rate cases with the FERC, although the formula rate results are subject to discovery and challenges by the FERC and intervenors. A significant portion of these services are provided to PacifiCorp's energy supply management function.

MidAmerican Energy participates in the MISO as a transmission-owning member. Accordingly, the MISO is the transmission provider under its FERC-approved OATT. While the MISO is responsible for directing the operation of MidAmerican Energy's transmission system, MidAmerican Energy retains ownership of its transmission assets and, therefore, is subject to the FERC's reliability standards discussed below. MidAmerican Energy's transmission business is managed and operated independently from its wholesale marketing business in accordance with the FERC's Standards of Conduct.

42


MidAmerican Energy constructed and owns four Multi-Value Projects ("MVPs") located in Iowa and Illinois that added approximately 250 miles of 345-kV transmission line to MidAmerican Energy's transmission system since 2012. The MISO's OATT allows for broad cost allocation for MidAmerican Energy's MVPs, including similar MVPs of other MISO participants. Accordingly, a significant portion of the revenue requirement associated with MidAmerican Energy's MVP investments is shared with other MISO participants based on the MISO's cost allocation methodology, and a portion of the revenue requirement of the other participants' MVPs is allocated to MidAmerican Energy, which MidAmerican Energy recovers from customers via a rider mechanism. The transmission assets and financial results of MidAmerican Energy's MVPs are excluded from the determination of its base retail electric rates.

The FERC has established an extensive number of mandatory reliability standards developed by the NERC and the WECC, including planning and operations, critical infrastructure protection and regional standards. Compliance, enforcement and monitoring oversight of these standards is carried out by the FERC; the NERC; and the WECC for PacifiCorp, Nevada Power, and Sierra Pacific; and the Midwest Reliability Organization for MidAmerican Energy.

Hydroelectric

The FERC licenses and regulates the operation of hydroelectric systems, including license compliance and dam safety programs. Most of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities are licensed by the FERC as major systems under the Federal Power Act, and certain of these systems are licensed under the Oregon Hydroelectric Act. Under the Federal Power Act, 16 of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric developments are classified as "high hazard potential," meaning it is probable in the event of a dam failure that loss of human life in the downstream population could occur. PacifiCorp uses the FERC's guidelines to develop public safety programs consisting of a dam safety program and emergency action plans.

For an update regarding PacifiCorp's Klamath River hydroelectric system, refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    General

MidAmerican Energy is subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC with respect to its license and 25% ownership interest in Quad Cities Station. Constellation Energy, the operator and 75% owner of Quad Cities Station, is under contract with MidAmerican Energy to secure and keep in effect all necessary NRC licenses and authorizations.

The NRC regulates the granting of permits and licenses for the construction and operation of nuclear generating stations and regularly inspects such stations for compliance with applicable laws, regulations and license terms. Current licenses for Quad Cities Station provide for operation until December 14, 2032. The NRC review and regulatory process covers, among other things, operations, maintenance, environmental and radiological aspects of such stations. The NRC may modify, suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply with the Atomic Energy Act, the regulations under such Act or the terms of such licenses.

Federal regulations provide that any nuclear operating facility may be required to cease operation if the NRC determines there are deficiencies in state, local or utility emergency preparedness plans relating to such facility, and the deficiencies are not corrected. Constellation Energy has advised MidAmerican Energy that an emergency preparedness plan for Quad Cities Station has been approved by the NRC. Constellation Energy has also advised MidAmerican Energy that state and local plans relating to Quad Cities Station have been approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency.

The NRC also regulates the decommissioning of nuclear-powered generating facilities, including the planning and funding for the eventual decommissioning of the facilities. In accordance with these regulations, MidAmerican Energy submits a biennial report to the NRC providing reasonable assurance that funds will be available to pay its share of the costs of decommissioning Quad Cities Station. MidAmerican Energy has established a trust for the investment of funds collected for nuclear decommissioning of Quad Cities Station.

43


Under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 ("NWPA"), the DOE is responsible for the selection and development of repositories for, and the permanent disposal of, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive wastes. Constellation Energy, as required by the NWPA, signed a contract with the DOE under which the DOE was to receive spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste for disposal beginning not later than January 1998. The DOE did not begin receiving spent nuclear fuel on the scheduled date and remains unable to receive such fuel and waste. The costs to be incurred by the DOE for disposal activities were previously being financed by fees charged to owners and generators of the waste. In accordance with a 2013 ruling by the D.C. Circuit, the DOE, in May 2014, provided notice that, effective May 16, 2014, the spent nuclear fuel disposal fee would be zero. In 2004, Constellation Energy, reached a settlement with the DOE concerning the DOE's failure to begin accepting spent nuclear fuel in 1998. As a result, Quad Cities Station has been billing the DOE, and the DOE is obligated to reimburse the station for all station costs incurred due to the DOE's delay. Constellation Energy has constructed an interim spent fuel storage installation ("ISFSI") at Quad Cities Station consisting of two pads to store spent nuclear fuel in dry casks in order to free space in the storage pool. The first dry cask was placed in-service in 2005. As of December 31, 2021, the first pad at the ISFSI is full, and the second pad is in operation. The first and second pads at the ISFSI are expected to facilitate storage of casks to support operations at Quad Cities Station through the end of its operating licenses.
Nuclear Insurance

MidAmerican Energy maintains financial protection against catastrophic loss associated with its interest in Quad Cities Station through a combination of insurance purchased by Constellation Energy, insurance purchased directly by MidAmerican Energy, and the mandatory industry-wide loss funding mechanism afforded under the Price-Anderson Amendments Act of 1988 ("Price-Anderson"), which was amended and extended by the Energy Policy Act. The general types of coverage maintained are: nuclear liability, property damage or loss and nuclear worker liability, as discussed below.

Constellation Energy purchases private market nuclear liability insurance for Quad Cities Station in the maximum available amount of $450 million, which includes coverage for MidAmerican Energy's ownership. In accordance with Price-Anderson, excess liability protection above that amount is provided by a mandatory industry-wide Secondary Financial Protection program under which the licensees of nuclear generating facilities could be assessed for liability incurred due to a serious nuclear incident at any commercial nuclear reactor in the U.S. Currently, MidAmerican Energy's aggregate maximum potential share of an assessment for Quad Cities Station is approximately $69 million per incident, payable in installments not to exceed $10 million annually.

The insurance for nuclear property damage losses covers property damage, stabilization and decontamination of the facility, disposal of the decontaminated material and premature decommissioning arising out of a covered loss. For Quad Cities Station, Constellation Energy purchases primary property insurance protection for the combined interests in Quad Cities Station, with coverage limits for nuclear damage losses up to $1.5 billion for nuclear perils and $500 million for non-nuclear perils. MidAmerican Energy also directly purchases extra expense coverage for its share of replacement power and other extra expenses in the event of a covered accidental outage at Quad Cities Station. The property and related coverages purchased directly by MidAmerican Energy and by Constellation Energy, which includes the interests of MidAmerican Energy, are underwritten by an industry mutual insurance company and contain provisions for retrospective premium assessments to be called upon based on the industry mutual board of directors' discretion for adverse loss experience. Currently, the maximum retrospective amounts that could be assessed against MidAmerican Energy from industry mutual policies for its obligations associated with Quad Cities Station total $8 million.

The master nuclear worker liability coverage, which is purchased by Constellation Energy for Quad Cities Station, is an industry-wide guaranteed-cost policy with an aggregate limit of $450 million for the nuclear industry as a whole, which is in effect to cover tort claims of workers in nuclear-related industries.

U.S. Mine Safety

PacifiCorp's surface mining operations are regulated by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration, which administers federal mine safety and health laws and regulations, and state regulatory agencies. The Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration has the statutory authority to institute a civil action for relief, including a temporary or permanent injunction, restraining order or other appropriate order against a mine operator who fails to pay penalties or fines for violations of federal mine safety standards. Information regarding PacifiCorp's mine safety violations and other legal matters disclosed in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K.

44


Interstate Natural Gas Pipeline Subsidiaries

The Pipeline Companies are regulated by the FERC, pursuant to the NGA and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978. Under this authority, the FERC regulates, among other items, (a) rates, charges, terms and conditions of service, (b) the construction and operation of interstate pipelines, storage and related facilities, including the extension, expansion or abandonment of such facilities and (c) the construction and operation of LNG export/import facilities. The Pipeline Companies hold certificates of public convenience and necessity and LNG facility authorizations issued by the FERC, which authorize them to construct, operate and maintain their pipeline and related facilities and services.

In February 2022, the FERC updated its certificate policy that guides the authorization of natural gas projects and issued an interim policy providing guidance on how the FERC will review a natural gas project for its impact on climate change. The policies apply to pending and future natural gas projects. On March 24, 2022, the FERC revoked application of the policies and sought further comments.

FERC regulations and the Pipeline Companies' tariffs allow each of the Pipeline Companies to charge approved rates for the services set forth in their respective tariffs. Generally, these rates are a function of the cost of providing services to customers, including prudently incurred operations and maintenance expenses, taxes, depreciation and amortization and a reasonable return on invested capital. Tariff rates for each of the Pipeline Companies have been developed under a rate design methodology whereby substantially all fixed costs, including a return on invested capital and income taxes, are collected through reservation charges, which are paid by firm transportation and storage customers regardless of volumes shipped. Commodity charges, which are paid only with respect to volumes actually shipped, are designed to recover the remaining, primarily variable, costs. Kern River's reservation rates have historically been approved using a "levelized" cost-of-service methodology so that the rate remains constant over the levelization period. This levelized cost of service has been achieved by using a FERC-approved depreciation schedule in which depreciation increases as the cost of capital decreases on declining rate base. Each of the Pipeline Companies also hold authority to negotiate rates for their services, subject to requirements to offer cost-based rate alternatives, and to publish such negotiated rates.In addition, for services that are not subject to FERC rate jurisdiction pursuant to Section 3 of the Natural Gas Act, Cove Point charges rates that are established by contract.

The Pipeline Companies' rates are subject to change in future general rate proceedings. Rates for natural gas pipelines are changed by filings under either Section 5 or Section 4 of the Natural Gas Act. Section 5 proceedings are initiated by the FERC or the pipeline's customers for a potential reduction to rates that the FERC finds are no longer just and reasonable. In a Section 5 proceeding, the initiating party has the burden of demonstrating that the currently effective rates of the pipeline are no longer just and reasonable, and of demonstrating alternative just and reasonable rates. Any rate decrease as a result of a Section 5 proceeding is implemented prospectively upon the issuance of a final FERC order adopting the new just and reasonable rates. Section 4 rate proceedings are initiated by the natural gas pipeline, who must demonstrate that the new proposed rates are just and reasonable. The new rates as a result of a Section 4 proceeding are typically implemented six months after the Section 4 filing if higher than prior rates and are subject to refund upon issuance of a final order by the FERC.

The FERC-regulated natural gas companies may not grant undue preference to any customer. FERC regulations require that certain information be made public for market access, through standardized internet websites.These regulations also restrict each pipeline's marketing affiliates' access to certain non-public information that could affect price or availability of service.

Interstate natural gas pipelines are also subject to regulations administered by the Office of Pipeline Safety within the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, an agency of the DOT. Federal pipeline safety regulations are issued pursuant to the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of 1968, as amended ("NGPSA"), which establishes safety requirements in the design, construction, operation and maintenance of interstate natural gas facilities, and requires an entity that owns or operates pipeline facilities to comply with such plans. Major amendments to the NGPSA include the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 ("2002 Act"), the Pipeline Inspection, Protection, Enforcement and Safety Act of 2006 ("2006 Act"), the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011 ("2011 Act") the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2016 ("2016 Act") and the Protecting Our Infrastructure of Pipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of 2020 ("2020 Act").

45


The 2002 Act established additional safety and pipeline integrity regulations for all natural gas pipelines in high-consequence areas. The 2002 Act imposed major new requirements in the areas of operator qualifications, risk analysis and integrity management. The 2002 Act mandated more frequent periodic inspection or testing of natural gas pipelines in high-consequence areas, which are locations where the potential consequences of a natural gas pipeline accident may be significant or may do considerable harm to persons or property. Pursuant to the 2002 Act, the DOT promulgated regulations that require natural gas pipeline operators to develop comprehensive integrity management programs, to identify applicable threats to natural gas pipeline segments that could impact high-consequence areas, to assess these segments and to provide ongoing mitigation and monitoring. The regulations require recurring inspections of high-consequence area segments every seven years after the initial baseline assessment.

The 2006 Act required pipeline operators to institute human factors management plans for personnel employed in pipeline control centers. DOT regulations published pursuant to the 2006 Act required development and implementation of written control room management procedures.

The 2011 Act was a response to natural gas pipeline incidents, most notably the San Bruno natural gas pipeline explosion that occurred in September 2010 in California. The 2011 Act increased the maximum allowable civil penalties for violations, directs operator assistance for Federal authorities conducting investigations and authorized the DOT to hire additional inspection and enforcement personnel. The 2011 Act also directed the DOT to study several topics, including the definition of high-consequence areas, the use of automatic shutoff valves in high-consequence areas, expansion of integrity management requirements beyond high-consequence areas and cast iron pipe replacement. The studies are complete, and a number of notices of proposed rulemaking have been issued. The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ("PHMSA") issued the Safety of Gas Transmission Pipelines: MAOP Reconfirmation, Expansion of Assessment Requirements and Other Related Amendments final rule in October 2019. The primary change was the expansion of the pipeline integrity assessment requirements to cover moderate-consequence areas and reconfirming maximum allowable operating pressures. Pipeline operators were required to develop procedures to address assessment requirements by July 2021 and complete 50% of the required MAOP reconfirmation actions by 2028 and the remaining by 2035. The BHE Pipeline Group has updated procedures, identified pipeline segments subject to the rule and has planned projects to complete required assessments. PHMSA sent Part 2 of the rule to the Federal Register for publishing August 4, 2022, and it was published in the Federal Register August 24, 2022. The rule initially had an effective date of May 2023, but has been extended to February 2024. The third part of the rule, the gas gathering rule, has also been issued, but has minimal impact on the BHE Pipeline Group.

The 2016 Act required the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration to set federal minimum safety standards for underground natural gas storage facilities and authorized emergency order authority. In February 2020, the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration issued a final rule regarding underground natural gas storage facilities that incorporates by reference the American Petroleum Institute's Recommended Practice 1171, "Functional Integrity of Natural Gas Storage in Depleted Hydrocarbon Reservoirs and Aquifer Reservoirs," clarifies certain aspects of the mandatory nature of the standard and defines regulatory completion dates for underground storage facility risk assessments. The BHE Pipeline Group has 20 total underground natural gas storage fields at EGTS and Northern Natural Gas that fall under this regulation and is complying with the final rule. The BHE Pipeline Group underground storage fields have had several audits under the Final Rule with no notices of probable violations issued. Kern River, Carolina Gas and Cove Point do not have underground natural gas storage facilities.

The 2020 Act required operations to review and update their inspection and maintenance plans to address how the plans contribute to eliminate hazardous leaks of natural gas, reduction of fugitive emissions and replacement or remediation of pipelines that are known to leak based on the material, design or past operating maintenance history. BHE Pipeline Group has completed the review and update of its inspection and maintenance plans. To assist in this effort, Kern River participated in a non-punitive pilot inspection with the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

The DOT and related state agencies routinely audit and inspect the pipeline facilities for compliance with their regulations. The Pipeline Companies conduct periodic internal audits of their facilities with more frequent reviews of those deemed higher risk. The Pipeline Companies also conduct preliminary audits in advance of agency audits. Compliance issues that arise during these audits or during the normal course of business are addressed on a timely basis. The Pipeline Companies believe their pipeline systems comply in all material respects with the NGPSA and with DOT regulations issued pursuant to the NGPSA.

46


Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, as holders of electricity distribution licenses, are subject to regulation by GEMA. GEMA regulates distribution network operators ("DNOs") within the terms of the Electricity Act 1989 and the terms of DNO licenses, which are revocable with 25 years notice. Under the Electricity Act 1989, GEMA has a duty to ensure that DNOs can finance their regulated activities and DNOs have a duty to maintain an investment grade credit rating. GEMA discharges certain of its duties through its staff within Ofgem. Each of fourteen licensed DNOs distributes electricity from the national grid transmission system and distribution-connected generators to end users within its respective distribution services area.

DNOs are subject to price controls, enforced by Ofgem, that limit the revenue that may be recovered and retained from their electricity distribution activities. The regulatory regime that has been applied to electricity distributors in Great Britain encourages companies to look for efficiency gains in order to improve profits. The distribution price control formula also adjusts the revenue received by DNOs to reflect a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the rate of inflation (as measured by the United Kingdom's Retail Prices Index) and the quality of service delivered by the licensee's distribution system. The next price control, Electricity Distribution 2 ("ED2"), will be set for a period of five years, starting April 1, 2023, although the formula has been, and may be, reviewed by the regulator following public consultation. The procedure and methodology adopted at a price control review are at the reasonable discretion of Ofgem. Ofgem's judgment of the future allowed revenue of licensees is likely to take into account, among other things:
the actual operating and capital costs of each of the licensees;
the operating and capital costs that each of the licensees would incur if it were as efficient as, in Ofgem's judgment, the more efficient licensees;
the actual value of certain costs which are judged to be beyond the control of the licensees;
the taxes that each licensee is expected to pay;
the regulatory value ascribed to the expenditures that have been incurred in the past and the efficient expenditures that are to be incurred in the forthcoming regulatory period;
the rate of return to be allowed on expenditures that make up the regulatory asset value;
the financial ratios of each of the licensees and the license requirement for each licensee to maintain investment grade status;
an allowance in respect of the repair of the pension deficits in the defined benefit pension schemes sponsored by each of the licensees; and
any under- or over-recoveries of revenues, relative to allowed revenues, in the previous price control period.

A number of incentive schemes also operate within the current price control period to encourage DNOs to provide an appropriate quality of service to end users. This includes specified payments to be made for failures to meet prescribed standards of service. The aggregate of these guaranteed standards payments is uncapped but may be excused in certain prescribed circumstances that are generally beyond the control of the DNOs.

The current electricity distribution price control became effective April 1, 2015 and is due to terminate on March 31, 2023, and will be immediately replaced with a new price control. Although it has been the convention in Great Britain for regulators to conduct periodic regulatory reviews before making proposals for any changes to the price controls, a new price control can be implemented by GEMA without the consent of the DNOs. If a licensee disagrees with a change to its license, it can appeal the matter to the United Kingdom's CMA, as can certain other parties. Any appeals must be notified within 20 working days of the license modification by GEMA. If the CMA determines that the appellant has relevant standing, then the statute requires that the CMA complete its process within six months, or in some exceptional circumstances seven months. The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies appealed Ofgem's proposals for the resetting of the formula that commenced April 1, 2015, as did one other party, and the CMA subsequently revised GEMA's decision.

The current price control was the first to be set for electricity distribution in Great Britain since Ofgem completed its review of network regulation (known as the RPI-X @ 20 project). The key changes to the price control calculations, compared to those used in previous price controls are that:
the period over which new regulatory assets are depreciated is being gradually lengthened, from 20 years to 45 years, with the change being phased over eight years;
47


allowed revenues will be adjusted during the price control period, rather than at the next price control review, to partially reflect cost variances relative to cost allowances;
the allowed cost of debt will be updated within the price control period by reference to a long-run trailing average based on external benchmarks of utility debt costs;
allowed revenues will be adjusted in relation to some new service standard incentives, principally relating to speed and service standards for new connections to the network; and
there was scope for a mid-period review and adjustment to revenues in the latter half of the period for any changes in the outputs required of licensees for certain specified reasons, although GEMA made no adjustments under this provision.

Under the current price control, as revised by the CMA, and excluding the effects of incentive schemes and any deferred revenues from the prior price control, the opening base allowed revenue of Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc remains constant in all subsequent years within the price control period (ED1) through 2022-23, before the addition of inflation. Nominal opening base allowed revenues will increase in line with inflation. Adjustments are made annually to recognize the effect of factors such as changes in the allowed cost of debt, performance on incentive schemes and catch up of prior year under- or over- recoveries.

Ofgem has completed the price control review that will result in a new price control effective April 1, 2023. The license modifications that give effect to the price control were published by Ofgem on February 3, 2023 and may be subject to appeal to the CMA if an appeal is filed by March 3, 2023. Many aspects of the current price control were maintained and the changes made generally follow the template that was set by the price controls implemented in April 2021 for transmission and gas distribution in Great Britain. Specific changes include new service standard incentives and mechanisms to adjust cost allowances in specific circumstances, particularly related to investment required to support decarbonization efforts, and partially updating the allowed return on equity within the period for changes in the interest rate on government bonds. Ofgem's final determinations also included an allowed cost of equity of 5.23% plus inflation (calculated using the United Kingdom's consumer prices index including owner occupiers' housing costs) and cost allowances representing a 20% real-term increase compared to the current regulatory period annual average. The base allowed revenue, excluding the effects of incentive schemes, pass-through costs and any deferred revenues from the prior price control, will decrease approximately 4.0% at Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and will increase approximately 2.5% at Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc, respectively, in 2023-24 before the addition of inflation.

Ofgem also monitors DNO compliance with license conditions and enforces the remedies resulting from any breach of condition. License conditions include the prices and terms of service, financial strength of the DNO, the provision of information to Ofgem and the public, as well as maintaining transparency, non-discrimination and avoidance of cross-subsidy in the provision of such services. Ofgem also monitors and enforces certain duties of a DNO set out in the Electricity Act 1989, including the duty to develop and maintain an efficient, coordinated and economical system of electricity distribution. Under changes to the Electricity Act 1989 introduced by the Utilities Act 2000, GEMA is able to impose financial penalties on DNOs that contravene any of their license duties or certain of their duties under the Electricity Act 1989, as amended, or that are failing to achieve a satisfactory performance in relation to the individual standards prescribed by GEMA. Any penalty imposed must be reasonable and may not exceed 10% of the licensee's revenue.

AltaLink

AltaLink is regulated by the AUC, pursuant to the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), the Public Utilities Act (Alberta), the Alberta Utilities Commission Act (Alberta) and the Hydro and Electric Energy Act (Alberta). The AUC is an independent, quasi-judicial agency established by the province of Alberta, Canada, which is responsible for, among other things, approving the tariffs of transmission facility owners, including AltaLink, and distribution utilities, acquisitions of such transmission facility owners or utilities, and construction and operation of new transmission projects in Alberta. The AUC also investigates and rules on regulated rate disputes and system access problems. The AUC regulates and oversees Alberta's electricity transmission sector with broad authority that may impact many of AltaLink's activities, including its tariffs, rates, construction, operations and financing.

48


The AUC has various core functions in regulating the Alberta electricity transmission sector, including the following:
regulating and adjudicating issues related to the operation of electric utilities within Alberta;
processing and approving general tariff applications relating to revenue requirements, capital expenditure prudency and rates of return including deemed capital structure for regulated utilities while ensuring that utility rates are just and reasonable, and approval of the transmission tariff rates of regulated transmission providers paid by the AESO, which is the independent transmission system operator in Alberta, Canada that controls the operation of AltaLink's transmission system;
approving the need for new electricity transmission facilities and permits to build and licenses to operate electricity transmission facilities;
reviewing operations and accounts from electric utilities and conducting on-site inspections to ensure compliance with industry regulation and standards;
adjudicating enforcement issues including the imposition of administrative penalties that arise when market participants violate the rules of the AESO; and
collecting, storing, analyzing, appraising and disseminating information to effectively fulfill its duties as an industry regulator.

In addition, AUC approval is required in connection with new energy and regulated utility initiatives in Alberta, amendments to existing approvals and financing proposals by designated utilities.

AltaLink's tariffs are regulated by the AUC under the provisions of the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) in respect of rates and terms and conditions of service. The Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) and related regulations require the AUC to consider that it is in the public interest to provide consumers the benefit of unconstrained transmission access to competitive generation and the wholesale electricity market. In regulating transmission tariffs, the AUC must facilitate sufficient investment to ensure the timely upgrade, enhancement or expansion of transmission facilities, and foster a stable investment climate and a continued stream of capital investment for the transmission system.

Under the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), AltaLink prepares and files applications with the AUC for approval of tariffs to be paid by the AESO for the use of its transmission facilities, and the terms and conditions governing the use of those facilities. The AUC reviews and approves such tariff applications based on a cost-of-service regulatory model under a forward test year basis. Under this model, the AUC provides AltaLink with a reasonable opportunity to (i) earn a fair return on equity; and (ii) recover its forecast costs, including operating expenses, depreciation, borrowing costs and taxes (including deemed income taxes) associated with its regulated transmission business. The AUC must approve tariffs that are just, reasonable and not unduly preferential, arbitrary or unjustly discriminatory. AltaLink's transmission tariffs are not dependent on the price or volume of electricity transported through its transmission system.

The AESO is an independent system operator in Alberta, Canada that oversees the Alberta Interconnected Electric System ("AIES") and wholesale electricity market. The AESO is responsible for directing the safe, reliable and economic operation of the AIES, including long-term transmission system planning. AltaLink and the other transmission facility owners receive substantially all of their transmission tariff revenues from the AESO. The AESO, in turn, charges wholesale tariffs, approved by the AUC, in a manner that promotes fair and open access to the AIES and facilitates a competitive market for the purchase and sale of electricity. The AESO monitors compliance with approved reliability standards, which are enforced by the Market Surveillance Administrator, which may impose penalties on transmission facility owners for non-compliance with the approved reliability standards.

The AESO determines the need and plans for the expansion and enhancement of the transmission system in Alberta in accordance with applicable law and reliability standards. The AESO's responsibilities include long-term transmission planning and management, including assessing the current and future transmission system capacity needs of market participants. When the AESO determines an expansion or enhancement of the transmission system is needed, with limited exceptions, it submits an application to the AUC for approval of the proposed expansion or enhancement. The AESO then determines which transmission provider should submit an application to the AUC for a permit and license to construct and operate the designated transmission facilities. Generally, the transmission provider operating in the geographic area where the transmission facilities expansion or enhancement is to be located is selected by the AESO to build, own and operate the transmission facilities. In addition, Alberta law provides that certain transmission projects may be subject to a competitive process open to qualified bidders.

49


Independent Power Projects

The Yuma, Cordova, Saranac, Power Resources, Topaz, Agua Caliente, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Bishop Hill II, Jumbo Road, Marshall, Grande Prairie, Walnut Ridge, Pinyon Pines I, Pinyon Pines II, Santa Rita, Independence, Fluvanna II, Flat Top, Mariah del Norte, Alamo 6 and Pearl independent power projects are Exempt Wholesale Generators ("EWG") under the Energy Policy Act, while the Community Solar Gardens, Imperial Valley and Wailuku independent power projects are currently certified as Qualifying Facilities ("QF") under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. Both EWGs and QFs generally are exempt from compliance with extensive federal and state regulations that control the financial structure of an electric generating plant and the prices and terms at which electricity may be sold by the facilities.

The Yuma, Cordova, Saranac, Imperial Valley, Topaz, Agua Caliente, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Bishop Hill II, Marshall, Grande Prairie, Walnut Ridge, Independence, Pinyon Pines I and Pinyon Pines II independent power projects have obtained authority from the FERC to sell their power at market-based rates. This authority to sell electricity in wholesale electricity markets at market-based rates is subject to triennial reviews conducted by the FERC. Accordingly, the respective independent power projects are required to submit triennial filings to the FERC that demonstrate a lack of market power over sales of wholesale electricity and electric generation capacity in their respective market areas. The Pinyon Pines I, Pinyon Pines II, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Topaz and Yuma independent power projects and power marketers CalEnergy, LLC and BHER Market Operations, LLC file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Southwest Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Southwest Region was made in June 2022 and is awaiting FERC action. The Cordova and Saranac independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together with MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Northeast Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Northeast Region was made in June 2020 and an order accepting it was issued in December 2020. The Bishop Hill II and Walnut Ridge independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together with MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Central Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Central Region was made in December 2020 and an order accepting it was issued in March 2021. The Marshall and Grande Prairie independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together for market power study purposes in the FERC-defined Southwest Power Pool Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Southwest Power Pool Region was made in December 2021, was supplemented in July 2022 and an order accepting it was issued in January 2023. Power marketers CalEnergy LLC and BHER Market Operations, LLC also file for market power study purposes in the FERC-defined Northwest Region together with PacifiCorp, Nevada Power Company, Sierra Power Company and certain affiliates. The most recent triennial filing for the Northwest Region was made in June 2022, and is awaiting FERC action.

The entire output of Jumbo Road, Santa Rita, Fluvanna II, Flat Top, Mariah del Norte, Alamo 6, Pearl and Power Resources is within the ERCOT and market-based authority is not required for such sales solely within ERCOT as the ERCOT market is not a FERC-jurisdictional market. Similarly, Wailuku sells its output solely to the Hawaii Electric Light Company within the Hawaii electric grid, which is not a FERC-jurisdictional market and therefore, Wailuku does not require market-based rate authority.

EWGs are permitted to sell capacity and electricity only in the wholesale markets, not to end users. Additionally, utilities are required to purchase electricity produced by QFs at a price that does not exceed the purchasing utility's "avoided cost" and to sell back-up power to the QFs on a non-discriminatory basis, unless they have successfully petitioned the FERC for an exemption from this purchase requirement. Avoided cost is defined generally as the price at which the utility could purchase or produce the same amount of power from sources other than the QF on a long-term basis. The Energy Policy Act eliminated the purchase requirement for utilities with respect to new contracts under certain conditions. New QF contracts are also subject to FERC rate filing requirements, unlike QF contracts entered into prior to the Energy Policy Act. FERC regulations also permit QFs and utilities to negotiate agreements for utility purchases of power at rates other than the utility's avoided cost.

Residential Real Estate Brokerage Company

HomeServices and its operating subsidiaries are regulated by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau which enforces the Truth In Lending Act ("TILA"), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ("ECOA") and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"); by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission with respect to certain franchising activities; by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which enforces the Fair Housing Act ("FHA"); and by state agencies where its subsidiaries operate. TILA and ECOA regulate lending practices. FHA prohibits housing-related discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. RESPA regulates real estate settlement services including real estate closing practices, lender servicing and escrow account practices and business relationships among settlement service providers and third parties to the transaction.

50


REGULATORY MATTERS

In addition to the discussion contained herein regarding regulatory matters, refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding the general regulatory framework.

PacifiCorp

Oregon

In July 2017,2021, in accordance with the OPUC's December 2020 general rate case order, PacifiCorp filed an application with the OPUC to initiate the review of PacifiCorp's estimated decommissioning and other closure costs per third-party studies associated with its coal-fueled generating facilities. The application requested an initial rate increase of $35 million, or 2.8%, to become effective January 1, 2022, to recover the incremental costs from those approved in the last general rate case. In November 2023, an independent evaluator was selected. Until the independent evaluator completes its work reviewing the third party studies that contain the estimated decommissioning and other closure costs and the OPUC issues an order, there will be no change to rates related to this filing.

In March 2022, PacifiCorp filed a general rate case requesting an overall rate change of $82 million, or 6.6%, to become effective January 1, 2023, that includes cost increases associated with the implementation of PacifiCorp's wildfire mitigation and vegetation management plans. Parties to the case filed testimony in June 2022. PacifiCorp filed reply testimony in July 2022 supporting an overall rate increase of $94 million but proposing that the request be capped at PacifiCorp's original request. PacifiCorp and parties to the case settled various aspects of the general rate case in multiple settlement stipulations. In August 2022, the first partial stipulation was filed resolving issues related to wildfire mitigation and vegetation management, including addressing the associated costs increases. Also in August 2022, a second partial stipulation was filed representing the settlement of certain revenue requirement issues among the stipulating parties, including the extension of Oregon's recovery period for Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 that will be converted to natural gas-fueled units and certain other issues. In September 2022, a third stipulation was filed resolving most of the remaining issues in the general rate case following the first and second partial stipulations. The stipulations together result in a total rate increase of $49 million, or 3.9%, effective January 1, 2023. The stipulating parties also agreed to amortize certain deferrals totaling approximately $10 million, or 0.8 %, in the first year of amortization, effective April 1, 2023. Further, in the third stipulation, PacifiCorp agreed to a general rate case stay-out provision under which it agreed not to file a general rate case with rates effective any earlier than January 1, 2025. In September 2022, the fourth and final partial stipulation was filed resolving technical issues related to a voluntary renewable energy tariff that will allow non-residential customers to purchase energy from renewable resources not currently in PacifiCorp's rates. In December 2022, the OPUC approved the first, second and third stipulations. The fourth stipulation was approved by the OPUC in February 2023.

In May 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2021 PCAM, which is the first time since the mechanism has been in place that a rate change has been warranted. After consideration of the mechanism's deadband, sharing band and earnings test, PacifiCorp requested recovery of $52 million, or a 4.2% increase, to become effective January 1, 2023. This request is incremental to the rate change sought in the general rate case. In September 2022, a settlement stipulation was filed agreeing to the recovery of the requested $52 million over a four-year period beginning April 1, 2023. In December 2022, the OPUC approved the settlement stipulation.

In July 2022, PacifiCorp filed an application requesting approval of an automatic adjustment clause with a balancing account to recover costs associated with implementing PacifiCorp's wildfire protection plan in Oregon. Oregon Senate Bill 762 provides for utilities to timely recover these costs through an automatic adjustment clause. The filing requests a rate increase of $20 million, or 1.6%, to recover incremental costs in 2022 and is incremental to costs addressed in PacifiCorp's wildfire mitigation and vegetation management mechanism through the general rate case stipulation described above. While PacifiCorp requested an effective date of August 24, 2022, the OPUC has suspended the filing for further review. In December 2022, a stipulation with certain parties was filed agreeing to the establishment of an automatic adjustment clause. A decision on the stipulation is expected in 2023.

Washington

In June 2021, PacifiCorp filed a power cost only rate case to update baseline net power costs for 2022. PacifiCorp requested a $13 million, or 3.7%, rate increase with an effective date of January 1, 2022. In November 2021, PacifiCorp reached a proposed settlement with most of the parties, which includes an agreement to adjust the PTC rate in base rates and apply a production factor and include a net power cost update as part of the compliance filing. A hearing was held in January 2022 and the WUTC issued an order approving the settlement in March 2022. A compliance filing reflecting a $43 million, or 12.2%, increase was filed in April 2022 and was approved by the WUTC the same month with rates effective May 1, 2022.
51



In June 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2021 PCAM and the new tracking mechanism for PTCs approved in the 2021 general rate case. For the 2021 PCAM, PacifiCorp is requesting a recovery of $26 million, or a 6.5% increase. PacifiCorp proposed that the 2021 PCAM be amortized over two years, rather than the one-year period required under the current terms of the PCAM. For the new 2021 PTC tracker, PacifiCorp is seeking recovery of $3 million, or an 0.8% increase. In November 2022, the WUTC approved PacifiCorp's proposal resulting in a combined annual increase of $16 million, or 4.0%, effective January 1, 2023.

Idaho

In October 2022, PacifiCorp filed an application for authority to implement the residential rate modernization plan. The plan proposes a five-year transition to increase the monthly customer service charge from $8.00 to $29.25 per month with a corresponding reduction to the energy rate, eliminates the tiered rates, and adjusts the on-peak off-peak period for time-of-day customers.

California

In August 2021, PacifiCorp filed an application with the CPUC to address California energy costs and GHG allowance costs, and in January 2022, an amended application was filed, per CPUC direction, to reflect ECAC rates which had been approved since the original filing was made. The amended application included an over $3 million rate increase associated with higher energy costs, and the previously sought increase of $3 million to recover GHG allowances. In March 2022, the CPUC approved the increase of $3 million to recover costs for purchasing GHG allowances as required by the state's Cap-and-Trade program. In November 2022, the CPUC approved and made effective the over $3 million rate increase associated with higher energy costs, for a combined rate increase of $7 million, or 6.6%.

In May 2022, PacifiCorp filed a general rate case requesting an overall rate change of $28 million, or 25.7%, to become effective January 1, 2023. In November 2022, the CPUC granted the requested rate effective date and directed PacifiCorp to establish a memorandum account to track the change in rates beginning January 1, 2023 until the new rates become effective, upon the issuance of a decision in late 2023. PacifiCorp filed rebuttal testimony in February 2023 with a slight adjustment of an overall rate increase of $27 million, or 25.0%. Also in February 2023, the CPUC issued a ruling requesting additional information on PacifiCorp's wildfire and risk analyses, and requested additional information regarding wildfire memorandum accounts.

In August 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2023 combined ECAC and GHG application requesting an overall rate increase of $15 million, or 13.6%, effective January 1, 2023. Approximately $4 million of the increase, or 3.6%, is attributed to the ECAC rate and $11 million of the increase, or 10.0%, to the GHG rate. In February 2023, PacifiCorp filed an amended application, per CPUC direction, to reflect ECAC rates which had been approved since the original filing was made in August 2022. The amended application would result in an overall rate increase of $11 million, or 10.1%. PacifiCorp anticipates interim approval of its GHG rates in March 2023 based on settlement discussions with parties.

FERC Show Cause Order

On April 15, 2021, the FERC issued an order to show cause and notice of proposed penalty related to allegations made by FERC Office of Enforcement staff that PacifiCorp failed to comply with certain NERC reliability standards associated with facility ratings on PacifiCorp's bulk electric system. The order directs PacifiCorp to show cause as to why it should not be assessed a civil penalty of $42 million as a result of the alleged violations. The allegations are related to PacifiCorp's response to a 2010 industry-wide effort directed by the NERC to identify and remediate certain discrepancies resulting from transmission facility design and actual field conditions, including transmission line clearances. In July 2021, PacifiCorp filed its answer to the FERC's show cause order denying the alleged violation of certain NERC reliability standards. The FERC Office of Enforcement staff replied in September 2021. In December 2022, the FERC issued a final order approving a stipulation and consent agreement between the FERC Office of Enforcement and PacifiCorp whereby PacifiCorp agreed to pay a $1.9 million cash penalty and committed to invest $2.5 million in reliability enhancements. The final order concludes the matter.

52


MidAmerican Energy

South Dakota

In May 2022, MidAmerican Energy filed a request with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission ("SDPUC") for an increase in its South Dakota retail natural gas rates, which would increase revenue by $7 million annually. If approved, the requested rates would increase retail customers' bills by an average of 6.4%.

Wind PRIME

In January 2022, MidAmerican Energy filed an application with the IUB for advance ratemaking principles for Wind PRIME. If approved, MidAmerican Energy expects to proceed with Wind PRIME, which consists of up to 2,042 MWs of new wind generation and up to 50 MWs of solar generation. If all of Wind PRIME generation is constructed, MidAmerican Energy will own over 9,300 MWs of wind generation and nearly 200 MWs of solar generation. Wind PRIME is projected to allow MidAmerican Energy to generate renewable energy greater than or equal to all of its Iowa retail customers' annual energy needs. MidAmerican Energy secured sufficient safe harbor equipment necessary to remain eligible for 100% PTCs under current tax law. Procedural hearings with the IUB began in February 2023.

Iowa Transmission Legislation

In June 2020, Iowa enacted legislation that grants incumbent electric transmission owners the right to construct, own and maintain electric transmission lines that have been approved for construction in a federally registered planning authority's transmission plan and that connect to the incumbent electric transmission owner's facility. Also known as the Right of First Refusal, the law ensures MidAmerican Energy, as an incumbent electric transmission owner, has the legal right to construct, own and maintain transmission lines that have been approved by the MISO (or another federally registered planning authority) in MidAmerican Energy's service territory. To exercise the legal right, MidAmerican Energy must notify the IUB within 90 days of any such approval for construction that it intends to construct, own and maintain the electric transmission line. The law still requires an incumbent electric transmission owner to obtain a state franchise from the IUB to construct, erect, maintain or operate an electric transmission line and, upon issuance of a franchise, the incumbent electric transmission owner must provide the IUB an estimate of the cost to construct the electric transmission line and, until the construction is complete, a quarterly report updating the estimated cost to construct the electric transmission line. Legal challenges have been brought against similar laws in other states, but courts that have ruled on such cases have upheld the states' laws. In October 2020, a lawsuit challenging the law was filed in Iowa by national transmission interests. The suit raised issues specific to Iowa law, and the State of Iowa defended the law in the suit. MidAmerican Energy intervened and defended the law as well. The Iowa district court dismissed the lawsuit in March 2021 for lack of standing, and the national transmission interests appealed. In June 2022, the Iowa Court of Appeals upheld the district court's decision, after which the national transmission interests asked the Iowa Supreme Court to reconsider. In November 2022, the Iowa Supreme Court granted the motion to reconsider and accepted the case on the briefs already submitted; it is expected that oral arguments will be held in spring 2023. No stay of the law has been granted, and the law remains in effect pending appeal.

53


NV Energy (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific)

Senate Bill 448 ("SB 448")

SB 448 was signed into law on June 10, 2021. The legislation is intended to accelerate transmission development, renewable energy and storage, and accelerate transportation electrification within the state of Nevada. In September 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed an amendment to the 2021 Joint IRP for the approval of their Transmission Infrastructure for a Clean Energy Economy Plan that sets forth a plan for the construction of high-voltage transmission infrastructure, Greenlink North among others, that will be placed into service no later than December 31, 2028, and requires the IRP to include at least one scenario that uses sources of supply that will achieve certain reductions in carbon dioxide emissions. In September 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed an application for the approval of their Economic Recovery Transportation Electrification Plan to accelerate transportation electrification in the state of Nevada. The plan establishes requirements for the contents of the transportation electrification investment as well as requirements for review, cost recovery and monitoring. The plan covers an initial period beginning January 1, 2022 and ending on December 31, 2024. In November 2021, the PUCN issued an order granting the application and accepting the Economic Recovery Transportation Electrification Plan with some modifications. The PUCN opened rulemakings to address other regulations that resulted from SB 448. In February 2022, the PUCN adopted regulations regarding the Economic Development Electric Rate Rider Program to revise the discounted electric rates to ease the economic burden on small businesses who take advantage of the discounted rates under the tariff. In September 2022, the PUCN adopted regulations regarding resource planning, which incorporates a plan to accelerate transportation electrification into the distributed resources plan pursuant to SB 448.

Transportation Electrification Plan ("TEP")

In September 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed an amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for the approval of a Distributed Resource Plan amendment to implement the state's first TEP pursuant to Section 51 of SB 448 and approve proposed tariffs and schedules to implement the TEP. The 2022 TEP outlines programs, investments and incentives to accelerate transportation electrification across Nevada. The Nevada Utilities proposed a budget of $348 million, which represents the maximum cost over the depreciable life of the TEP's programs and assets, to deploy the TEP in 2023 through 2024. A hearing related to the application for approval of the TEP was held in February 2023.

ON Line Temporary Rider ("ONTR")

In October 2021, Sierra Pacific filed an application with the PUCN proposed amendmentsfor approval of the ONTR with corresponding updates to theirits electric rate tariffs necessary to comply withauthorize recovery of the provisionsOne Nevada Transmission Line ("ON Line") regulatory asset being accumulated as a result of AB 405. The filingthe ON Line cost reallocation as well as the related on-going reallocated revenue requirement. Sierra Pacific's application would have, if approved by the PUCN as filed, resulted in July 2017 also included a proposed optional timeone-time rate increase of use rate tariff for both Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, which has not yet been set for procedural review.$28 million to be collected over a nine-month period starting on April 1, 2022. In September 2017,March 2022, the PUCN issued an order directing Sierra Pacific to recover $14 million of the ON Line regulatory asset as a one-time rate increase collectable over a nine-month period effective April 1, 2022, with the expected remaining balance at December 31, 2022 to be included in rate base in the 2022 regulatory rate review for inclusion in the rates set in that case. In December 2022, the PUCN issued an order in the general rate review proceeding allowing for recovery of the remaining regulatory asset balance and directed Sierra Pacific to establish a regulatory liability for any over-collection of revenues from the ONTR rate rider which shall accrue carry charges.

Merger Application

In March 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed a joint application with the PUCN for authorization to placemerge Sierra Pacific with and into Nevada Power, with Nevada Power being the surviving entity. If approved by the PUCN as filed, Nevada Power will have two distinct electric service territories in northern and southern Nevada each with their own rates and one natural gas service territory in the Reno and Sparks area. In October 2022, all new private generation customers who have submitted applications after June 15, 2017parties to the proceedings relating to the joint application entered into a new rate class with rates equalStipulation to delay the rate class they would be in if they were not private generation customers. Private generation customers with installed net metering systems less than 25-kilowatts prior to June 15, 2017 may elect to migrate to the new rate class created under AB 405 or stay in their otherwise-applicable rate class.procedural schedule. The new AB 405 rates became effectiveNevada Utilities made a supplemental filing on December 1, 2017.

Emissions Reduction and Capacity Replacement Plan

Consistent with the Emissions Reduction and Capacity Replacement Plan ("ERCR Plan"), Nevada Power acquired a 272-MW natural gas co-generating facility in 2014, acquired a 210-MW natural gas peaking facility in 2014, constructed a 15-MW solar photovoltaic facility in 2015 and contracted two renewable power purchase agreements with 100-MW solar photovoltaic generating facilities in 2015. In February 2016, Nevada Power solicited proposals to acquire 35 MW of nameplate renewable energy capacity to be owned by Nevada Power. Nevada Power did not enter into any agreements to acquire the 35 MW of nameplate renewable energy capacity; however, it has the option to acquire the 35 MW in the future under the ERCR Plan, subject to PUCN approval. In addition, Nevada Power was granted approval to purchase the remaining 130 MW of the Silverhawk natural gas-fueled combined cycle generating facility. In June 2016, Nevada Power executed a long-term power purchase agreement for 100 MW of nameplate renewable energy capacity in Nevada. In December 2016, the30, 2022. An order was approved. In addition, the order approved the early retirement of Reid Gardner Unit 4is expected in the first quarterhalf of 2017. These transactions are related to Nevada Power's compliance with Senate Bill No. 123, resulting in the retirement of 812 MW of coal-fueled generation by 2019.2023.


IRP
54



Regulatory Rate Review

In July 2016,June 2022, Sierra Pacific filed its statutorily required IRP.a regulatory rate review with the PUCN that requested an annual revenue increase of $88 million, or 9.7%. In addition, a filing was made to revise depreciation rates based on a study, the results of which are reflected in the proposed revenue requirement. In August 2016, Nevada Power2022, Sierra Pacific filed an amendmentupdated certification filing that updated the requested annual revenue increase to its related IRP. As a part$77 million, or 8.5%. Parties to the docket filed testimony and supporting documentation in August and September 2022 while rebuttal testimony was filed in September and October 2022. Hearings in the cost of the filings, the Nevada Utilities sought PUCN authorization to acquire the South Point Energy Center, a 504-MW combined-cycle generating facility locatedcapital, revenue requirement, and rate design phases were held in Arizona.September, October, and November 2022, respectively. In December 2016,2022, the PUCN deniedissued an order approving an increase in base rates of $58 million, effective January 1, 2023, reflecting a reduction in Sierra Pacific's requested rate of return, updated depreciation and amortization rates for its electric operations and updated time of use periods to reflect the acquisition of this facility. changes in system costs due to the increased solar generation on the system.

BHE Pipeline Group

BHE GT&S

In January 2017, Nevada PowerSeptember 2021, EGTS filed a petitiongeneral rate case for reconsideration relatingits FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective November 1, 2021. EGTS' previous general rate case was settled in 1998. EGTS proposed an annual cost-of-service of approximately $1.1 billion, and requested increases in various rates, including general system storage rates by 85% and general system transmission rates by 60%. In October 2021, the acquisition of South Point Energy Center.FERC issued an order that accepted the November 1, 2021 effective date for certain changes in rates, while suspending the other changes for five months following the proposed effective date, until April 1, 2022, subject to refund. In February 2017, the PUCN affirmed the denial of the acquisition of South Point Energy Center. The Nevada Utilities amended their respective IRPs in November 2017, requesting approval of three long-term renewable purchase power contracts. Nevada lawSeptember 2022, a settlement agreement was modified in 2017 under Senate Bill 146 and for future filings requires Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific to file jointly.

Kern River

In December 2016, Kern River filed a Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement with the FERC, to establish an alternative set ofresolving EGTS' general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services and providing for increased service rates for customers that extend service contracts associated with Kern River's original system and 2002 expansion, 2003 expansion and 2010 expansion projects. The stipulation provided a lower rate option to customers, improved the likelihood of re-contracting expiring capacity and extended recovery of Kern River's rate base.decreased depreciation rates. Under the stipulation, customers have the option to stay with previously established rates or choose the alternative lower rates. The reduction in rates was accomplished by extending the rate term to 25 years insteadterms of the current termsettlement agreement, EGTS' rates result in an increase to annual firm transmission and storage revenues of 10 or 15 years, resultingapproximately $160 million and a decrease in rates that are 9% to 26% lower than the previously established rates. Kern River received FERC approvalannual depreciation expense of the stipulation in January 2017. The stipulation allowed regulatory depreciation on plant allocated to volumes of shippers that elected extended Period Two rates and plant allocated to capacity that has been turned back to be adjusted to 25 years, retroactiveapproximately $30 million, compared to the startrates in effect prior to April 1, 2022. As of each Period Two term.December 31, 2022, EGTS' provision for rate refund for April 2022 through December 2022 totaled $90 million and was included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In November 2022, the FERC approved the settlement agreement.

ALP

General Tariff Applications


In November 2014, ALPJanuary 2020, pursuant to the terms of a previous settlement, Cove Point filed a general tariff application ("GTA") requestingrate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective March 1, 2020. Cove Point proposed an annual cost-of-service of approximately $182 million. In February 2020, the AUCFERC approved suspending the changes in rates for five months following the proposed effective date, until August 1, 2020, subject to approve revenue requirementsrefund. In November 2020, Cove Point reached an agreement in principle with the active participants in the general rate case proceeding. Under the terms of C$811the agreement in principle, Cove Point's rates effective August 1, 2020 resulted in an increase to annual revenues of approximately $4 million for 2015 and C$1.0 billion for 2016, primarily due to continued investmenta decrease in capital projects as directed by the AESO. ALP amended the GTA in June 2015 and October 2015. In May 2016, the AUC issued its decision pertainingannual depreciation expense of approximately $1 million, compared to the 2015-2016 GTA. ALPrates in effect prior to August 1, 2020. The interim settlement rates were implemented November 1, 2020, and Cove Point's provision for rate refunds for August 2020 through October 2020 totaled $7 million. The agreement in principle was reflected in a stipulation and agreement filed its 2015-2016 GTA compliance filing in July 2016 to comply with the AUC's decisionFERC in January 2021. In March 2021, the FERC approved the stipulation and agreement and the rate refunds to provide customers with approximately C$415were processed in late April 2021.

Northern Natural Gas

In July 2022, Northern Natural Gas filed a general rate case that proposed an overall annual cost-of-service of $1.3 billion. This is an increase of $323 million tariff reliefabove the cost of service filed in 2015 and 2016 through: (i) the discontinuanceits 2019 rate case of construction work-in-progress ("CWIP") in$1.0 billion. Depreciation on increased rate base and an increase in depreciation and negative salvage rates account for $115 million of the return$323 million increase in the filed cost of service. Northern Natural Gas has requested increases in various rates, including transportation and storage reservation rates. In January 2023, the FERC approved Northern Natural Gas filing to AFUDC accountingimplement its interim rates effective January 1, 2015,2023, subject to refund and (ii) the outcome of hearing procedures.

55


BHE Transmission

AltaLink

2022-2023 General Tariff Application

In April 2021, AltaLink filed its 2022-2023 GTA delivering on the last two years of its commitment to keep rates flat for customers at or below the 2018 level of C$904 million for the five-year period from 2019 to 2023. The two-year application achieves flat tariffs by continuing to transition to the AUC-approved salvage recovery method and continuing the use of the flow-through income tax method, with an overall year-over-year increase of approximately 2% in 2022 and 2023 revenue requirements. AltaLink's 2022-2023 GTA reflected its continued commitment to provide rate stability to customers by maintaining flat tariffs and providing additional tariff relief measures, including a proposed tariff refund of previously collected CWIPC$60 million of accumulated depreciation in rate base as parteach of ALP's2022 and 2023. The application requested the approval of transmission tariffs during 2011-2014 less related returns.of C$824 million and C$847 million for 2022 and 2023, respectively after proposed refunds. In October 2016, ALPSeptember 2021, AltaLink provided responses to information requests from the AUC and filed an amended its 2015-2016 GTA compliance filing made in July 2016application to reflect the impacts of the generic cost of capital decision issued in October 2016.certain adjustments and forecast updates.


In December 2016,January 2022, the AUC issued its decision with respect to ALP's 2015-2016 GTA compliance filing made in July 2016, as amended.AltaLink's 2022-2023 GTA. The AUC found that ALP has either complied with ordid not approve AltaLink's proposed refund due to an anticipated improvement in general economic conditions in Alberta. In March 2022, AltaLink filed a review and variance application requesting the AUC has otherwise relieved ALP from its compliance with all its directions into review and vary its decision except for Directive 47, which dealt withto deny AltaLink's proposed C$120 million refund of accumulated depreciation surplus, given material changes in circumstances since the determination of the refund for previously collected CWIPdecision was issued in rate base and all related amounts.January 2022. In January 2017, ALP filed its second compliance filing as directed by the AUC and requested a technical conference to explain the technical aspects of the filing. In March 2017, the technical conference was held, and all key aspects of ALP's approach and methodologies used in its second compliance filing to comply with AUC directives were reviewed and discussed. In April 2017, ALP filed with the AUC an amendment to its second compliance filing.


In August 2017,May 2022, the AUC issued a decision with respect to ALP's second compliance filing amendment filed in April 2017. The AUC denied ALP's proposalAltaLink's application to remove C$7 million of recapitalized AFUDC associated with canceled projects on the basis that the amount would more appropriately be recovered through ALP's deferral account reconciliation process. The AUC also directed the recalculation of the amount of related income taxes using typical direct assigned project schedules filed in the general tariff applications,review and to adjustvary its funded future income tax liability only for the change in timing differences.

In September 2017, ALP filed its third compliance filing with the AUC which proposed a one-time payment to the AESO of C$7 million to settle the 2015-2016 final transmission tariffs of C$485 million for 2016 and C$723 million for 2015. In December 2017, the AUC approved ALP's third compliance filing as filed.

ALP filed its 2017-2018 GTA in February 2016. The AUC held this application in abeyance pending the release of the 2015-2016 GTA Decision. ALP subsequently updated and refiled its 2017-2018 GTA in August 2016 to reflect the findings and conclusions of the AUC in its 2015-2016 GTA decision issued in May 2016. In October 2016, ALP amended its 2017-2018 GTA to reflect the impacts of the generic cost of capital decision issued in October 2016 and other updates and revisions. The amendment requests the AUC to approve ALP's revenue requirement of C$891 million for 2017 and C$919 million for 2018. The 2017-2018 GTA reflected an additional C$185 million of tariff relief related to items approved in the 2015-2016 GTA decision. In December 2016, the AUC approved ALP's request to enter into a negotiated settlement process.

In January 2017, ALP successfully reached a negotiated settlement with all parties regarding all aspects of ALP's 2017-2018 GTA and in February 2017, ALP filed with the AUC the 2017-2018 negotiated settlement application for approval. The application consists of negotiated reductions of C$16 million of operating expenses and C$40 million of transmission maintenance and information technology capital expenditures over the two years, as well as an increase to miscellaneous revenue of C$3 million. These reductions resulted in a C$24 million, or 1.3%, net decrease to the two-year total revenue requirement applied for in ALP's 2017-2018 GTA amendment filed in October 2016. In addition, ALP proposed to provide significant tariff relief through the refund of previously collected accumulated depreciation surplus of C$130 million (C$125 million net of other related impacts). The negotiated settlement agreement also provides for additional potential reductions over the two years through a 50/50 cost savings sharing mechanism.

During the second quarter 2017, ALP responded to information requests from the AUC with respect to its 2017-2018 negotiated settlement agreement application filed in February 2017. In August 2017, the AUC issued a decision approving ALP's negotiated settlement agreement for the 2017-2018 GTA, as filed. Also, the AUC approved a C$31$120 million refund of accumulated depreciation surplus as opposed tosurplus. The AUC did not agree that the C$130 million refund proposed by ALPAlberta economy had materially deteriorated and three customer groups.determined that the long-term costs outweigh the short-term benefits of the refund.


In November 2017, ALP filed and received AUC approval regardingJuly 2022, AltaLink submitted its second compliance filing which includesapplication with total 2022 and 2023 revenue requirements ofat C$864879 million and C$888883 million, for 2017 and 2018, respectively. In August 2022, the AUC approved the revised revenue requirements as filed, allowing AltaLink to fully deliver on its flat-for-five commitment to customers.


2018 Generic Cost of Capital Proceeding


In July 2017,January 2022, the AUC deniedinitiated the utilities' request that the interim determinations of 8.5% return on equity and deemed capital structures for 2018 be made final, by stating that it is not prepared to finalize 2018 values in the absence of an evidentiary process and its intention to issue the2023 generic cost of capital proceeding. The proceeding will be conducted in two stages. The first stage will determine the cost of capital parameters for 2023 and the second stage will consider returning to a formula-based approach to establish cost of capital adjustments, commencing in 2024. In March 2022, the AUC issued its decision for 2018, 2019 and 2020with respect to the first stage of the 2023 GCOC proceeding by approving the endextension of 2018 to reduce regulatory lag. The AUC also confirmed the process timelines with an oral hearing scheduled for March 2018.

In October 2017, ALP's evidence was submitted recommending a range of 9% to 10.75%2022 return on equity on a recommendedof 8.5% and deemed equity ratio of 40%. ALP also filed evidence outlining increased uncertainties in37% for 2023, recognizing lingering uncertainty and continued volatility of financial markets due to the Alberta utility regulatory environment.COVID-19 pandemic. In January 2018,June 2022, the Consumers' Coalition of Alberta,AUC initiated the Utilities Consumer Advocate andsecond stage to explore a formula-based approach to determine the City of Calgary filed intervenor evidence. The return on equity recommended by the intervenors ranges from 6.3% to 7.75%. The equity ratio recommended by the intervenors for ALP ranges from 35% to 37%.2024 and future test periods.



Deferral Account Reconciliation Application

In April 2017, ALP filed its application with the AUC with respect to ALP's 2014 projects and deferral accounts and specific 2015 projects. The application includes approximately C$2.0 billion in net capital additions. In June 2017, the AUC ruled that the scope of the deferral account proceeding would not be extended to consider the utilization of assets for which final cost approval is sought. However, the AUC will initiate a separate proceeding to address the issue of transmission asset utilization and how the corporate and property law principles applied in the Utility Asset Disposition decision may relate.

In December 2017, ALP amended its application to include the remaining capital projects completed in 2015. The amended 2014 and 2015 deferral account reconciliation application includes 110 completed projects with total gross capital additions, excluding AFUDC, of C$3.8 billion.

BHE U.S. Transmission


A significant portion of ETT's revenues are based on interim rate changes that can be filed twice annually and are subject to review and possible true-up in the next filed base regulatory rate review.review scheduled for no later than February 1, 2025. In December 2017,February 2023, the most recent interim rate change filing was approved which set total annual revenue requirements at $332 million and a rate basePublic Utilities Commission of $2.5 billion. In January 2017, the PUCTTexas ("PUCT") approved ETT's request to suspend thea base regulatory rate review filing scheduled for February 2017 and set ETT's annual revenue requirement to $327 million, effective March 2017.2023. Results of a base regulatory rate review would be prospective except for any deemed disallowance by the PUCT of the transmission investment since the initial base regulatory rate review in 2007. In June 2018, the PUCT approved ETT's application to reduce its transmission revenue by $28 million to reflect the lower federal income tax rate due to 2017 Tax Reform with the amortization of excess accumulated deferred federal income taxes expected to be addressed in the next base rate case.


56


ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS


Each Registrant is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, RPS,climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact each Registrant's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state, local and international agencies. Each Registrant believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many laws and regulations are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts.

The Company has cumulative investments in (i) owned wind, solar and geothermal generating facilities of $31.6 billion and (ii) wind tax equity investments of $5.8 billion and has retired 16 coal-fueled generation facilities. As a result, as of December 31 2022, the Company reduced its annual GHG emissions by more than 27% as compared to 2005 levels. The Company plans to continue investing in wind, solar and other low-carbon generation and storage in the future, including (i) $6.4 billion on the construction of renewable generating facilities and repowering certain existing wind-powered generating facilities through 2025 and (ii) $1.3 billion on the construction of electric battery and pumped hydro storage facilities through 2025, and to retire an additional 16 coal-fueled generation facilities between 2023 and 2030 in a reliable and cost-effective manner, thereby achieving a 50% reduction in GHG emissions from 2005 levels in 2030. Refer to "Liquidity and Capital Resources" of each respective Registrant in Item 7 of this Form 10-K for discussion of each Registrant's forecast environmental-relatedrenewable generation-related capital expenditures.


Clean On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the "2022 Act") was signed into law. The 2022 Act contains numerous provisions, including expanded tax credits for clean energy incentives and a 15% corporate alternative minimum income tax on "adjusted financial statement income". The provisions of the 2022 Act become effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. The Company currently does not expect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. However, the Company expects future guidance from the Treasury Department and will continue to evaluate the impact of the 2022 Act as more guidance becomes available.

Air ActQuality Regulations


The Clean Air Act, is a federal law administered by the EPA thatas well as state laws and regulations impacting air emissions, provides a framework for protecting and improving the nation's air quality and controlling sources of air emissions. The implementation of new standards is generally outlined in SIPs, which are a collection ofThese laws and regulations programs and policiescontinue to be followed. SIPs vary bypromulgated and implemented and will impact the operation of BHE's generating facilities and require them to reduce emissions at those facilities to comply with the requirements. In addition, the potential adoption of state or federal clean energy standards, which include low-carbon, non-carbon and are subject to public hearingsrenewable electricity generating resources, may also impact electricity generators and EPA approval. Some states may adopt additional or more stringent requirements than those implemented by the EPA. The major Clean Air Act programs most directly affecting the Registrants' operations are described below.natural gas providers.


National Ambient Air Quality Standards


Under the authority of the Clean Air Act, the EPA sets minimum national ambient air quality standardsNAAQS for six principal pollutants, consisting of carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen oxides,NOx, particulate matter, ozone and sulfur dioxide,SO2, considered harmful to public health and the environment. Areas that achieve the standards, as determined by ambient air quality monitoring, are characterized as being in attainment, while those that fail to meet the standards are designated as being nonattainment areas. Generally, sources of emissions in a nonattainment area that are determined to contribute to the nonattainment are required to reduce emissions. Most air quality standards require measurement over a defined period of time to determine the average concentration of the pollutant present. Currently, with the exceptions described in the following paragraphs, air quality monitoring data indicates that all counties where the relevant Registrant's major emission sources are located are in attainment of the current national ambientNAAQS.

57


On June 4, 2018, the EPA published final ozone designations for much of the U.S. Relevant to the Registrants, these designations include classifying Yuma County, Arizona; Clark County, Nevada; and the Northern Wasatch Front, Southern Wasatch Front and Duchesne and Uintah counties in Utah as nonattainment-marginal with the 2015 ozone standard. These areas were required to meet the 2015 standard three years from the August 3, 2018, effective date. All other areas relevant to the Registrants were designated attainment/unclassifiable with this same action. However, on January 29, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated several provisions of the 2018 implementing rules for the 2015 ozone standards for contravening the Clean Air Act. The EPA and environmental groups finalized a consent decree in January 2022 that sets deadlines for the agency to approve or disapprove the "good neighbor" provisions of interstate ozone plans of dozens of states. Relevant to the Registrants, the EPA must, by April 30, 2022, propose to approve or disapprove the interstate ozone SIPs of Alabama, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin. On February 22, 2022, the EPA published a series of proposed decisions to disapprove the SIPs for interstate ozone transport of 19 states. Relevant to the Registrants, these states include Alabama, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The EPA also proposed to approve Iowa's SIP after re-analyzing the state's data. In addition, the EPA must approve or disapprove the interstate plans of Arizona, California, Nevada and Wyoming. On April 15, 2022 the EPA issued its final rule approving Iowa's SIP as meeting the good neighbor provisions for the 2015 ozone standard. On May 24, 2022 the EPA disapproved the Utah and Wyoming interstate ozone SIPs. On January 30, 2023, the EPA entered into a stipulated extension to the deadline for action on the Wyoming SIP, setting a new deadline of December 15, 2023. The EPA explained that the extra time is needed to fully consider updated air quality standards.

In October 2015,information and public comments. The EPA is also reevaluating SIPs for Tennessee and Arizona. On January 31, 2023, the EPA revisedissued final disapproval of the national ambient air quality standard for ground level ozone, strengthening19 SIPs proposed in April 2022, setting the standard from 75 parts per billionstage to 70 parts per billion. It is anticipated thatinclude those states in the federal implementation plan described under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule. Separately, on March 28, 2022, the EPA proposed determinations as to whether certain areas have achieved levels of ground-level ozone pollution that meet the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS. Relevant to Registrants, the Southern Wasatch Front in Utah and Yuma, Arizona are proposed to have met the 2015 ozone standard; and the Cincinnati area of Ohio and Kentucky and the Northern Wasatch Front in Utah are proposed to have not met the 2015 ozone, will make attainment/nonattainment designations for the revised standards by late 2017. Nonattainment areasbe reclassified as Moderate Non-Attainment, and will have until 2020 to late 2037August 3, 2024 to meet the standard. GivenUntil the level at whichEPA takes final action on the standard was set in conjunction with retirementsproposal and the installation of controls, the new standard is not expected to have a significant impact onaffected states submit any required SIPs, the relevant Registrant. The EPA designatedRegistrants cannot determine the entire state of Iowa as attainment/unclassifiable on November 16, 2017.

Until the 2015 standard is fully implemented, the EPA continues to implement the 2008 ozone standards. The Upper Green River Basin Area in Wyoming, including all of Sublette and portions of Lincoln and Sweetwater Counties, were proposed to be designated as nonattainment for the 2008 ozone standard. When the final designations were released in April 2012, portions of Lincoln and Sweetwater Counties and Sublette County were determined to be in marginal nonattainment. While PacifiCorp's Jim Bridger plant is located in Sweetwater County, it is not in the portion of the designated nonattainment area and has not been impacted by the 2012 designation. In December 2017, EPA Region 9 notified Nevada of its intent to designate a portion of Clark County as nonattainment under the 2015 standard and will modify the state's recommendation for this area. The EPA also intends to designate all other areas in the state not previously designated as attainment/unclassifiable. This redesignation to nonattainment could potentially impact Nevada Power's Clark, Sun Peak, Las Vegas, Lenzie, Silverhawk, Harry Allen, Higgins, and Goodsprings generating facilities. However, until such time as the 2015 standard is implemented for Clark County in a final action, any potential impacts cannot be determined. In order for the EPA to consider more current air quality data in the final designation, Nevada must submit certified quality-assured air quality monitoring data for the time period 2015-2017 to the EPA by February 28, 2018. After considering any additional information received, the EPA plans to promulgate final ozone designations in spring of 2018.

On December 20, 2017, the EPA responded to the state of Arizona's recommendation that a section of Yuma County, in which the Yuma independent power project is located, be designated as nonattainment with respect to the 2015 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for ozone, indicating its acceptance of the state's designations for areas in attainment, and requesting additional data to finalize designations of nonattainment areas by February 28, 2018. The Yuma independent power project could be impacted by the requirements of the final rule. Until such time as the designations are final, any potential impacts cannot be determined.

In January 2010, the EPA finalized a one-hour air quality standard for nitrogen dioxide at 100 parts per billion. In February 2012, the EPA published final designations indicating that based on air quality monitoring data, all areas of the country are designated as "unclassifiable/attainment" for the 2010 nitrogen dioxide national ambient air quality standard.

In June 2010, the EPA finalized a new national ambient air quality standard for sulfur dioxide. Under the 2010 rule, areas must meet a one-hour standard of 75 parts per billion utilizing a three-year average. The rule utilizes source modeling in addition to the installation of ambient monitors where sulfur dioxide emissions impact populated areas. Attainment designations were due by June 2012; however, citing a lack of sufficient information to make the designations, the EPA did not issue its final designations until July 2013 and determined, at that date, that a portion of Muscatine County, Iowa was in nonattainment for the one-hour sulfur dioxide standard. MidAmerican Energy's Louisa coal-fueled generating facility is located just outside of Muscatine County, south of the violating monitor. In its final designation, the EPA indicated that it was not yet prepared to conclude that the emissions from the Louisa coal-fueled generating facility contribute to the monitored violation or to other possible violations, and that in a subsequent round of designations, the EPA will make decisions for areas and sources outside Muscatine County. MidAmerican Energy does not believe a subsequent nonattainment designation will have a material impact on the Louisa coal-fueled generating facility. Although the EPA's July 2013 designations did not impact PacifiCorp's nor the Nevada Utilities' generating facilities, the EPA's assessment of sulfur dioxide area designations will continue with the deployment of additional sulfur dioxide monitoring networks across the country.

The Sierra Club filed a lawsuit against the EPA in August 2013 with respect to the one-hour sulfur dioxide standards and its failure to make certain attainment designations in a timely manner. In March 2015, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ("Northern District of California") accepted as an enforceable order an agreement between the EPA and Sierra Club to resolve litigation concerning the deadline for completing the designations. The Northern District of California's order directed the EPA to complete designations in three phases: the first phase by July 2, 2016; the second phase by December 31, 2017; and the final phase by December 31, 2020. The first phase of the designations require the EPA to designate two groups of areas: 1) areas that have newly monitored violations of the 2010 sulfur dioxide standard; and 2) areas that contain any stationary source that, according to the EPA's data, either emitted more than 16,000 tons of sulfur dioxide in 2012 or emitted more than 2,600 tons of sulfur dioxide and had an emission rate of at least 0.45 lbs/sulfur dioxide per million British thermal unit in 2012 and, as of March 2, 2015, had not been announced for retirement. MidAmerican Energy's George Neal Unit 4 and the Ottumwa Generating Station (in which MidAmerican Energy has a majority ownership interest, but does not operate), are included as units subject to the first phase of the designations, having emitted more than 2,600 tons of sulfur dioxide and having an emission rate of at least 0.45 lbs/sulfur dioxide per million British thermal unit in 2012. States may submit to the EPA updated recommendations and supporting information for the EPA to consider in making its determinations. Iowa submitted documentation to the EPA in April 2016 supporting its recommendation that Des Moines, Wapello and Woodbury Counties be designated as being in attainment of the standard. In July 2016, the EPA's final designations were published in the Federal Register indicating portions of Muscatine County, Iowa were in nonattainment with the 2010 sulfur dioxide standard, Woodbury County, Iowa was unclassifiable, and Des Moines and Wapello Counties were unclassifiable/attainment.


On January 9, 2018, the EPA published the results for the Air Quality Designations for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Primary National Ambient Air Quality Standard-Round 3 in the Federal Register. The Utah county of Emery, where PacifiCorp's Hunter and Huntington generation stations are located, was classified as attainment/unclassifiable. The Wyoming counties of Campbell and Lincoln, where PacifiCorp's Wyodak and Naughton generation stations are located, were classified as attainment/unclassifiable. The eastern portion of Sweetwater County, where PacifiCorp's Jim Bridger generation station is located, was classified as attainment/unclassifiable. Converse County, where PacifiCorp's Dave Johnston generation station is located, will not be designated until December 31, 2020.

In December 2012, the EPA finalized more stringent fine particulate matter national ambient air quality standards, reducing the annual standard from 15 micrograms per cubic meter to 12 micrograms per cubic meter and retaining the 24-hour standard at 35 micrograms per cubic meter. The EPA did not set a separate secondary visibility standard, choosing to rely on the existing secondary 24-hour standard to protect against visibility impairment. In December 2014, the EPA issued final area designations for the 2012 fine particulate matter standard. Based on these designations, the areas in which the relevant Registrant operates generating facilities have been classified as "unclassifiable/attainment." Unless additional monitoring suggests otherwise, the relevant Registrant does not anticipate that any impacts of the revised standard will be significant.proposed rule.


In December 2014, the Utah SIP for fine particulate matter was adopted by the Utah Air Quality Board. PacifiCorp's Lake Side and Gadsby generating facilities operate within nonattainment areas for fine particulate matter; however, the SIP did not impose significant new requirements on PacifiCorp's impacted generating facilities, nor did the EPA's comments on the Utah SIP identify requirements for PacifiCorp's existing generating facilities that would have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.

As new, more stringent national ambient air quality standards are adopted, the number of counties designated as nonattainment areas is likely to increase. Businesses operating in newly designated nonattainment counties could face increased regulation and costs to monitor or reduce emissions. For instance, existing major emissions sources may have to install reasonably available control technologies to achieve certain reductions in emissions and undertake additional monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting. The construction or modification of facilities that are sources of emissions could also become more difficult in nonattainment areas. Until new requirements are promulgated and additional monitoring and modeling is conducted, the impacts on the Registrants cannot be determined.

Mercury and Air Toxics Standards

In March 2011, the EPA proposed a rule that requires coal-fueled generating facilities to reduce mercury emissions and other hazardous air pollutants through the establishment of "Maximum Achievable Control Technology" standards. The final MATS became effective on April 16, 2012, and required that new and existing coal-fueled generating facilities achieve emission standards for mercury, acid gases and other non-mercury hazardous air pollutants. Existing sources were required to comply with the new standards by April 16, 2015 with the potential for individual sources to obtain an extension of up to one additional year, at the discretion of the Title V permitting authority, to complete installation of controls or for transmission system reliability reasons. The relevant Registrants have completed emission reduction projects to comply with the final rule's standards for acid gases and non-mercury metallic hazardous air pollutants.

MidAmerican Energy retired certain coal-fueled generating units as the least-cost alternative to comply with the MATS. Walter Scott, Jr. Energy Center Units 1 and 2 were retired in 2015, and George Neal Energy Center Units 1 and 2 were retired in April 2016. A fifth unit, Riverside Generating Station, was limited to natural gas combustion in March 2015.

Numerous lawsuits have been filed in the D.C. Circuit challenging the MATS. In April 2014, the D.C. Circuit upheld the MATS requirements. In November 2014, the United States Supreme Court agreed to hear the MATS appeal on the limited issue of whether the EPA unreasonably refused to consider costs in determining whether it is appropriate to regulate hazardous air pollutants emitted by electric utilities. Oral argument in the case was held before the United States Supreme Court in March 2015, and a decision was issued by the United States Supreme Court in June 2015, which reversed and remanded the MATS rule to the D.C. Circuit for further action. The United States Supreme Court held that the EPA had acted unreasonably when it deemed cost irrelevant to the decision to regulate generating facilities, and that cost, including costs of compliance, must be considered before deciding whether regulation is necessary and appropriate. The United States Supreme Court's decision did not vacate or stay implementation of the MATS rule. In December 2015, the D.C. Circuit issued an order remanding the rule to the EPA, without vacating the rule. As a result, the relevant Registrants continue to have a legal obligation under the MATS rule and the respective permits issued by the states in which each respective Registrant operates to comply with the MATS rule, including operating all emissions controls or otherwise complying with the MATS requirements.


Cross-State Air Pollution Rule


The EPA promulgated an initial rule in March 2005 to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxidesNOx and sulfur dioxide,SO2, precursors of ozone and particulate matter, from down-wind sources in the eastern United States, including Iowa,U.S. to reduce emissions by implementing a plan based on a market-based cap-and-trade system, emissions reductions, or both. After numerous appeals, the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule ("CSAPR")CSAPR was promulgated to address interstate transport of sulfur dioxideSO2 and nitrogen oxidesNOx emissions in 27 easternEastern and Midwestern states.

The first phase of the rule was implemented January 1, 2015. In November 2015,March 2022, the EPA released aits Good Neighbor Rule, which contains proposed rule that would further reduce nitrogen oxides emissions in 2017. The final rule was published in the Federal Register in October 2016. The rule requires additional reductions in nitrogen oxides emissions beginning in May 2017. On December 23, 2016, a lawsuit was filed against the EPA in the D.C. Circuit over the final CSAPR "update" rule, which is still pending.

MidAmerican Energy has installed emissions controls at its coal-fueled generating facilitiesrevisions to comply with the CSAPR framework and may purchase emissions allowancesis intended to meet a portion of its compliance obligations. The cost of these allowances is subject to market conditions at the time of purchase and historically has not been material. MidAmerican Energy believes that the controls installed to date are consistent with the reductions to be achieved from implementation of the rule and does not anticipate that any impacts of the CSAPR update will be significant.

MidAmerican Energy operates natural gas-fueled generating facilities in Iowa and BHE Renewables operates natural gas-fueled generating facilities in Texas, Illinois and New York, which are subject to the CSAPR. However, the provisions are not anticipated to have a material impact on Berkshire Hathaway Energy or MidAmerican Energy. None of PacifiCorp's, Nevada Power's or Sierra Pacific's generating facilities are subject to the CSAPR. However, in a Notice of Data Availability published in the January 6, 2017, Federal Register, the EPA provided preliminary estimates of which upwind states may have linkages to downwind states experiencingaddress ozone levels at or exceedingtransport for the 2015 ozone national ambient air quality standardNAAQS. The rule focuses on reductions of 70 parts per billion,NOx and using similar methodologycovers 26 states. Relevant to thatthe Registrants, four states are included in the CSAPR, indicated thatcross-state program for the first time - California, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. The EPA proposes to retain emissions allowance trading for generating facilities. Beginning in 2023, emissions budgets would be set at the level of reductions achievable through immediately available measures such as consistently operating existing emissions controls. Starting in 2026, emissions budgets would be set at levels achievable by the installation of SCR controls at certain generating facilities. The proposal also includes additional industries beyond the power sector for the first time, with a focus on the top NOx emitting stationary source categories. These include natural gas pipeline compressor stations, among others. These sources will not have access to trading and will instead be subject to rate-based limits that are assigned for each source category. The EPA accepted comments on the proposal through June 21, 2022. On February 1, 2023, the EPA released updated air transport modeling that indicates two states, Delaware and Wyoming, could have an obligation underdo not significantly contribute to downwind maintenance receptors; and that four states, Arizona, Iowa, Kansas and New Mexico, in fact do significantly contribute to downwind maintenance receptors. It is anticipated that the "good neighbor" provisions ofEPA will rely on this updated modeling in the Clean Air Actfinal good neighbor rule, which it intends to reduce nitrogen oxides emissions.finalize in March 2023. Additional notice and comment rulemaking, such as a supplemental rule, would be required to rescind Iowa's approved SIP and incorporate additional states into the program. Until the EPA takes final action consistent with this decree, impacts to the relevant Registrants cannot be determined.


Regional Haze


The EPA's Regional Haze Rule, finalized in 1999, requires states to develop and implement plans to improve visibility in designated federally protected areas ("Class I areas"). Some of PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities in Utah, Wyoming, Arizona and Colorado and certain of Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's fossil-fueled generating facilities are subject to the Clean Air Visibility Rules. In accordance with the federal requirements, states are required to submit SIPs that address emissions from sources subject to best available retrofit technology ("BART")BART requirements and demonstrate progress towards achieving natural visibility requirements in Class I areas by 2064.


The
58


In June 2019, the state of Utah issuedincorporated a BART alternative into its SIP for regional haze planning period one. The BART alternative makes the shutdown of PacifiCorp's Carbon generating facility enforceable under the SIP requiringand removes the installation of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter controlsrequirement to install SCR equipment on Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington Units 1 and 2. In December 2012, theThe EPA approved the sulfur dioxide portion of the Utah regional haze SIP and disapproved the nitrogen oxides and particulate matter portions. Certain groups appealed the EPA's approval of the sulfur dioxide portion and oral argument was heard before the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit ("Tenth Circuit") in March 2014. In October 2014, the Tenth Circuit upheld the EPA's approval of the sulfur dioxide portion of the SIP. The state of Utah and PacifiCorp filed petitions for administrative and judicial review of the EPA's final rule onrevision with the BART determinations for the nitrogen oxides and particulate matter portionsalternative in October 2020. The EPA's actions also withdrew a prior FIP that required installation of Utah's regional haze SIP in March 2013. In May 2014, the Tenth Circuit dismissed the petitionSCR equipment on jurisdictional grounds. In addition, and separate from the EPA's approval process and related litigation, the Utah Division of Air Quality completed an alternative BART analysis for Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington Units 1 and 2. On January 19, 2021, Heal Utah, National Parks Conservation Association, Sierra Club and Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment filed a petition for review of the Utah Regional Haze SIP Alternative in the Tenth Circuit. PacifiCorp and the state of Utah moved to intervene in the litigation. After review of the rule by the Biden administration, the EPA determined it would defend the rule and briefing has been completed. A date for oral arguments has not been scheduled. The alternative BART analysis and revisedUtah Air Quality Board approved the Utah Division of Air Quality's SIP for the regional haze second planning period on June 6, 2022. The SIP were submitted in June 2015 to the EPAsets mass-based NOx emissions limits and rate-based SO2 limits for review and proposed action after a public comment period. In January 2016, the EPA published two alternative proposals to either approve the Utah SIP as written or reject the Utah SIP relating to nitrogen oxides controls and require the installation of selective catalytic reduction ("SCR") controls atPacifiCorp's Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington Units 1 and 2 within five years. EPA's final action on the Utah regional haze SIP was effective August 4, 2016. The EPA approved in part and disapproved in part the Utah regional haze SIP and issued a federal implementation plan ("FIP") requiring the installation of SCR controls at Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington Units 1 and 2 within five years of the effective date of the rule. PacifiCorp and other parties filed requests with the EPAgenerating facilities to reconsider and stay that decision, as well as filed motions for stay and petitions for review with the Tenth Circuit asking the court to overturn the EPA's actions. In July 2017, the EPA issued a letter indicating it would reconsider its decision issuing the FIP. In light of the EPA's grant of reconsideration and the EPA's position in the litigation, the Tenth Circuit held the litigation in abeyance and imposed a stay of the compliance obligations of the FIPensure reasonable visibility progress for the number of days the stay is in effect while the EPA conducts its reconsideration process.second planning period.


The state of Wyoming issued two regional haze SIPs requiring the installation of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxidesSO2, NOx and particulate matter controls on certain PacifiCorp coal-fueled generating facilities in Wyoming. The EPA approved the sulfur dioxideSO2 SIP in December 2012 and the EPA's approval was upheld on appeal by the Tenth Circuit in October 2014. In addition, the EPA initially proposed in June 2012 to disapprove portions of the nitrogen oxides and particulate matter SIP and instead issue a FIP. The EPA withdrew its initial proposed actions on the nitrogen oxides and particulate matter SIP and the proposed FIP, published a re-proposed rule in June 2013, and finalized its determination in January 2014, which aligns more closely with the SIP proposed by the state of Wyoming. The EPA's final action on the Wyoming SIP in 2014 approved the state's plan to have PacifiCorp install low-nitrogen oxideslow-NOx burners at Naughton Units 1 and 2, SCR controls at Naughton Unit 3 by December 2014, SCR controls at Jim Bridger Units 1 through 4 between 2015 and 2022, and low-nitrogen oxideslow-NOx burners at Dave Johnston Unit 4. The EPA disapproved a portion of the Wyoming SIP and issued a FIP for Dave Johnston Unit 3, where it required the installation of SCR controls by 2019 or, in lieu of installing SCR controls, a commitment to shut down Dave Johnston Unit 3 by 2027, its currently approved depreciable life. The EPA also disapproved a portion of the Wyoming SIP and issued a FIP for the Wyodak coal-fueled generating facility, ("Wyodak Facility"), requiring the installation of SCR controls within five years (i.e., by 2019). The EPA action became final on March 3, 2014.2019. PacifiCorp filed an appeal of the EPA's final action on the Wyodak Facility in March 2014. The state of Wyoming and several environmental groups also filed an appeal of the EPA's final action, as did the Powder River Basin Resource Council, National Parks Conservation Association and Sierra Club.action. In September 2014, the Tenth Circuit issued a stay of the March 2019 compliance deadline for the Wyodak, Facility, pending further action by the Tenth Circuit in the appeal. A stayThe abatement on litigation was lifted September 28, 2022, and opening briefs were submitted in October 2022. PacifiCorp objects to the EPA's FIP requiring SCR on the Wyodak Unit. That requirement in the agency's plan remains in placestayed by the court. PacifiCorp has also intervened on behalf of the EPA against claims that Naughton Units 1 and 2 should have been subject to a SCR requirement. Separately, on February 14, 2022, the First Judicial District Court for the State of Wyoming entered a consent decree reached between the state of Wyoming and PacifiCorp resolving claims of threatened violations of the Clean Air Act, the Wyoming Environmental Quality Act and the case has not yet been setWyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations at the Jim Bridger facility. No penalties were imposed under the consent decree. Consistent with the terms and conditions of the consent decree, PacifiCorp must convert both units to natural gas and begin meeting emissions limits consistent with that conversion by January 1, 2024. The EPA and PacifiCorp executed an administrative order on consent June 9, 2022, covering compliance for oral argument. In June 2014,Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 under the regional haze rule. The federal order contains the same emission and operating limits as the Wyoming Departmentconsent decree and adds federal approval of Environmentalthe compliance pathway outlined in the state consent decree, including revision of the SIP to include conversion of Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 to natural gas. The order includes a one-year deadline to complete the SIP revision. On December 30, 2022, the Wyoming Air Quality issued aDivision submitted the state-approved revised BART permit allowing Naughton Unit 3 to operate on coal through 2017 and providing forregional haze state implementation plan requiring natural gas conversion of the unit in 2018; in October 2016, an application was filed with the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality requesting a revision of the dates for the end of coal firingJim Bridger units 1 and the start of gas firing for Naughton Unit 3 to align with the requirements of the Wyoming SIP. The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality approved a change to the requirements for Naughton Unit 3, extending the requirement to cease coal firing to no later than January 30, 2019, and complete the gas conversion by June 30, 2019. On March 17, 2017, Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality issued an extension to operate the unit as a coal-fueled unit through January 30, 2019. The Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality submitted a proposed revision to the Wyoming SIP, including a change to the Naughton Unit 3 compliance date,2 to the EPA for approval Novemberapproval. The plan revision replaces a previous requirement for selective catalytic reduction at the units. The Wyoming Air Quality Division also issued an air permit for the natural gas conversion of Jim Bridger units 1 and 2 on December 28, 2017.

2022. The stateEPA is expected to conduct a separate federal public comment process on the plan. For the second round of Arizona issued a regional haze SIP requiring, among other things, the installation of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matterplanning, Wyoming determined that no controls will be necessary on Cholla Unit 4. The EPA approved in part, and disapproved in part, the Arizona SIP and issued a FIP for the disapproved portions requiring SCR controls on Cholla Unit 4. PacifiCorp filed an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ("Ninth Circuit") regarding the FIP as it relatesany Wyoming resources to Cholla Unit 4, and the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality and other affected Arizona utilities filed separate appeals of the FIP as it relates to their interests. The Ninth Circuit issued an order in February 2015, holding the matter in abeyance while the parties pursued an alternate compliance approach for Cholla Unit 4. The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality's revision of the draft permit and revision to the Arizona regional haze SIP were approved by the EPA through final action published in the Federal Register on March 27, 2017, with an effective date of April 26, 2017. The final action allows Cholla Unit 4 to utilize coal until April 30, 2025 and convert to gas or otherwise cease burning coal by June 30, 2025.make reasonable progress.


The state of Colorado regional haze SIP requires SCR controlsequipment at Craig Unit 2 and Hayden Units 1 and 2, in which PacifiCorp has ownership interests. Each of those regional haze compliance projects are either already in service or currently being constructed.in-service. In addition, in February 2015, the state of Colorado finalized an amendment to its regional haze SIP relating to Craig Unit 1, in which PacifiCorp has an ownership interest, to require the installation of SCR controls by 2021. In September 2016, the owners of Craig Units 1 and 2 reached an agreement with state and federal agencies and certain environmental groups that were parties to the previous settlement requiring SCR to retire Unit 1 by December 31, 2025, in lieu of SCR installation, or alternatively to remove the unit from coal-fueled service by August 31, 2021 with an option to convert the unit to natural gas by August 31, 2023, in lieu of SCR installation. The terms of the agreement were approved by the Colorado Air Quality Board in December 2016. The terms of the agreement were2016, incorporated into an amended Colorado regional haze SIP in 2017 and wereapproved by the EPA in August 2018. PacifiCorp identified a December 31, 2025, retirement date for Craig Unit 1 in its 2017 and 2019 IRPs.

59


Nevada, Utah and Wyoming each submitted regional haze SIPs for the regional haze second planning period to the EPA for its review and approval.

Untilin August 2022. The EPA has 18 months to approve or disapprove all or parts of the states' plans. On August 25, 2022, the EPA takes final action in each state and decisions have been made in the pending appeals, PacifiCorp, cannot fully determine the impactspromulgated a finding of the Regional Haze Rule on its respective generating facilities.


The Navajo Generating Station, in which Nevada Power isfailure to submit a joint owner with an 11.3% ownership share, is also a source that is subject toSIP for the regional haze BARTsecond planning period for 15 states, including Iowa. The finding establishes a two-year deadline for the agency to promulgate FIPs to address the requirements, unless prior to promulgating a FIP, the state submits, and the agency approves, a SIP meeting the requirements. In January 2013,The finding says the agency intends to continue to work with states in developing approvable SIP submittals in a timely manner. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources continues to work with the EPA announced a proposed FIP addressing BART and an alternative for the Navajo Generating Station that includes a flexible timeline for reducing nitrogen oxides emissions. The EPAon development of its SIP. On February 13, 2023, Iowa issued a draft SIP and will accept comment on the draft plan through March 16, 2023. Iowa proposes to require operational improvements to existing control equipment at MidAmerican Energy Company's Louisa Generation Station and Walter Scott Jr. Energy Center - Unit 3. Iowa anticipates submitting a final FIP on August 8, 2014 adopting, with limited changes,plan to the Navajo Generating Station proposal as a "better than BART" determination. Nevada Power filed the ERCR PlanEPA in May 2014 that proposed to eliminate its ownership participation in the Navajo Generating Station in 2019, which was approved by the PUCN. In February 2017, the non-federal owners of the Navajo Generating Station announced the facility will shut down on or before December 23, 2019, unless new owners can be found. All current owners have since approved a lease extension with the Navajo Nation to allow operations to continue through 2019. As of the end of 2017, no viable offers for a new ownership structure were presented. In the event that a new owner is identified, compliance with the FIP, imposing a long-term facility-wide cap on total emissions of nitrogen oxides and alternative operating scenarios such as curtailment or other emission reductions equivalent to installation of selective catalytic reduction on two units in 2030, would be required.spring 2023.


Climate Change


In December 2015, an international agreement was negotiated by 195 nations to create a universal framework for coordinated action on climate change in what is referred to as the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement reaffirms the goal of limiting global temperature increase well below 2 degrees Celsius, while urging efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius;Celsius and reaching a global peak of GHG emissions as soon as possible to achieve climate neutrality by mid-century; establishes commitments by all parties to make nationally determined contributions and pursue domestic measures aimed at achieving the commitments; commits all countries to submit emissions inventories and report regularly on their emissions and progress made in implementing and achieving their nationally determined commitments; and commits all countries to submit new commitments every five years, with the expectation that the commitments will get more aggressive. In the context of the Paris Agreement, the United StatesU.S. agreed to reduce greenhouse gasGHG emissions 26% to 28% by 2025 from 2005 levels. After more than 55 countries representing more than 55% of global greenhouse gasGHG emissions submitted their ratification documents, the Paris Agreement became effective November 4, 2016. Under2016; however, the U.S. completed its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on November 4, 2020. President Biden accepted the terms of the climate agreement on January 20, 2021, and the U.S. completed its reentry February 19, 2021. New commitments to the Paris Agreement ratifying countrieswere announced in April 2021, with the U.S. pledging to cut its overall GHG emissions 50% to 52% from 2005 levels by 2030 and to reach 100% carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035. Increasingly, states are bound for a three-year periodadopting legislation and must provide one-year's noticeregulations to reduce GHG emissions, and local governments and consumers are seeking increasing amounts of their intent to withdraw. On June 1, 2017, President Trump announced the United States would withdraw from the Paris Agreement. Under the terms of the agreement, the withdrawal would be effective in November 2020. The cornerstone of the United States' commitment was the Clean Power Plan which was finalized by the EPA in 2015 but has since been proposed for repeal by the EPA.clean and renewable energy.


60


GHG Performance Standards


Under theAffordable Clean Air Act, the EPA may establish emissions standards that reflect the degree of emissions reductions achievable through the best technology that has been demonstrated, taking into consideration the cost of achieving those reductions and any non-air quality health and environmental impact and energy requirements. On August 3, 2015, the EPA issued final new source performance standards, establishing a standard of 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide per MWh for large natural gas-fueled generating facilities and 1,400 pounds of carbon dioxide per MWh for new coal-fueled generating facilities with the "Best System of Emission Reduction" reflecting highly efficient supercritical pulverized coal facilities with partial carbon capture and sequestration or integrated gasification combined-cycle units that are co-fired with natural gas or pre-combustion slipstream capture of carbon dioxide. The new source performance standards were appealed to the D.C. Circuit and oral argument was scheduled for April 17, 2017. However, oral argument was deferred and the court held the case in abeyance for an indefinite period of time. Until such time as the EPA undertakes further action to reconsider the new source performance standards or the court takes action, any new fossil-fueled generating facilities constructed by the relevant Registrants will be required to meet the GHG new source performance standards.Energy Rule

Clean Power Plan


In June 2014, the EPA released proposed regulations to address GHG emissions from existing fossil-fueled generating facilities, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The EPA's proposal calculated state-specific emission rate targets to be achieved based on the "Best System"best system of Emission Reduction.emission reduction." In August 2015, the final Clean Power Plan was released, which established the Best Systembest system of Emission Reductionemission reduction as including: (a) heat rate improvements; (b) increased utilization of existing combined-cycle natural gas-fueled generating facilities; and (c) increased deployment of new and incremental non-carbon generation placed in-service after 2012. The compliance period would have begun in 2022, with three interim periods of compliance and with the final goal to be achievedClean Power Plan was stayed by 2030 and was expected to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the power sector to 32% below 2005 levels by 2030. On February 9, 2016, the United States Supreme Court ordered that the EPA's emission guidelines for existing sources be stayed pending the disposition of the challenges to the rule in the D.C. Circuit and any action on a writ of certiorari before the U.S. Supreme Court. Oral argument was heard before the D.C. Circuit on September 27, 2016. The court has not yet issued its decision.Court in February 2016 while litigation proceeded. On October 10, 2017,June 19, 2019, the EPA issued a proposal to repealrepealed the Clean Power Plan and issued the Affordable Clean Energy rule. In the Affordable Clean Energy rule, the EPA willdetermined that the best system of emission reduction for existing coal-fueled generating facilities is limited to actions that can be taken at a point source facility, specifically heat rate improvements and identified a set of candidate technologies and measures that could improve heat rates. Measures taken to meet the standards of performance must be achieved at the source itself. The Affordable Clean Energy rule was challenged by environmental and health groups in the D.C. Circuit. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded the Affordable Clean Energy rule to the EPA, finding that the rule "rested critically on a mistaken reading of the Clean Air Act" that limited the best system of emission reduction to actions taken at a facility. In October 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal of that decision. Arguments in the case were held February 28, 2022, and on June 30, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision regarding the scope of the EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the "generation shifting" approach in the Clean Power Plan exceeded the powers granted to the EPA by Congress, although the court did not address whether the EPA may only adopt measures applied at the individual source as it did in the Affordable Clean Energy rule. A key area where the EPA went astray was using the Clean Power Plan to give states the option to promulgate regulations that would encourage "generation shifting," or moving away from higher-polluting power sources like coal to lower-polluting sources like natural gas or renewables. The U.S. Supreme Court found that type of regulation, which would impact larger economic forces beyond the fence lines of individual generating facilities, is not permitted under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit's vacatur of the Affordable Clean Energy rule and remanded the case for further proceedings. The ruling has no immediate impact on the Registrants, as there is no Section 111(d) rule currently in effect. The Biden administration plans to propose by March 2023 its own rule to replace the Clean Power Plan and Affordable Clean Energy rule.

New Source Performance Standards for Methane Emissions

In August 2020, the EPA finalized regulations to rescind standards for methane emissions from the oil and gas sector. The changes eliminate requirements to regulate methane emissions from the production, processing, transmission and storage of oil and gas. The rule was immediately challenged by environmental and tribal groups, as well as numerous states. In January 2021, the D.C. Circuit lifted an administrative stay and allowed the rule to take commentseffect, finding that groups challenging the rule had not met the standard for a long-term stay. On June 30, 2021, President Biden signed into law a joint resolution of Congress, adopted under the Congressional Review Act, disapproving the August 2020 rule. The resolution reinstated the 2012 volatile organic compounds standards and the 2016 volatile organic compounds and methane standards for the oil and natural gas transmission and storage segments, as well as the methane standards for the production and processing segments of the oil and gas sector. On November 2, 2021, the EPA proposed rules that would reduce methane emissions from both new and existing sources in the oil and natural gas industry. The proposals would expand and strengthen emission reduction requirements for new, modified and reconstructed oil and natural gas sources and would require states to reduce methane emissions from existing sources nationwide. The EPA took comment on the proposed repeal until April 26, 2018. In addition,rules through January 31, 2022. The EPA issued a supplemental proposal in November 2022 to further strengthen emission reduction requirements and intends to finalize the EPA published inrules by fall 2023. Until the Federal Register an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on December 28, 2017, seeking public input on, without committing to, a potential replacement rule. The public comment period forrules are finalized, the Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking is currently scheduled to conclude February 26, 2018. Therelevant Registrants cannot determine the full impacts of the EPA's recent efforts to repeal the Clean Power Plan are not expected to have a material impact on the Registrants. PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific have historically pursued cost-effective projects, including plant efficiency improvements, increased diversification of their generating fleets to include deployment of renewable and lower carbon generating resources, and advanced customer energy efficiency programs.proposed rule.

Notwithstanding the absence of comprehensive climate legislation or regulation, the Registrants have continued to invest in lower- and non-carbon generating resources and to operate in an environmentally responsible manner. In July 2015, BHE signed the American Business Act on Climate pledge, in which BHE pledged to build on the Company's combined investment of more than $15 billion in renewable energy generation under construction and in operation through 2014 by investing up to an additional $15 billion. Components of BHE's pledge, which continue to be implemented, include:
Pursue the construction of an additional 552 MW of new wind-powered generation in Iowa, increasing MidAmerican Energy's generating portfolio to more than 4,000 MW of wind, which was equivalent to an estimated 51 percent of its Iowa customers' annual retail usage in 2017. MidAmerican Energy surpassed its Climate Pledge commitments in 2016 and 2017 and is currently continuing with the construction of an additional 2,000 MW of wind-powered generation in Iowa, of which 334 MW was placed in-service in 2017. The 2,000-MW wind project is expected to be fully complete in late 2019, and by year-end 2020, MidAmerican Energy's annual renewable energy generation is expected to reach a level that is equivalent to more than 90% of its Iowa customers' annual retail usage. MidAmerican Energy owns the largest portfolio of wind-powered generating capacity in the United States among rate-regulated utilities.
Retire more than 75 percent of the Nevada Utilities' coal-fueled generating capacity in Nevada by 2019. In accordance with the ERCR plan filed in May 2014, Nevada Power retired Reid Gardner Units Nos. 1-3 in December 2014 and Reid Gardner Unit No. 4 in March 2017, which represented 300 MW and 257 MW, respectively, of coal-fueled generating capacity in Nevada. Additionally, as part of the ERCR plan filed in May 2014 and approved by the PUCN, Nevada Power anticipates eliminating its ownership participation in the Navajo Generating Station in 2019.
Add more than 1,000 MW of incremental solar and wind capacity through long-term power purchase agreements to PacifiCorp's owned 1,030 MW of wind-powered generating capacity. PacifiCorp owns the second largest portfolio of wind-powered generating capacity in the United States among rate-regulated utilities. PacifiCorp's Climate Pledge commitments were met December 2016. As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp's non-carbon generating capacity, owned and contracted, totaled 4,573 MW, which is capable of generating energy equivalent to 24 percent of its retail sales in 2017. In 2017, PacifiCorp announced Energy Vision 2020, which will significantly expand the amount of wind power serving customers by 2020 through a $3 billion investment in repowering its existing wind fleet with larger blades and newer technology; adding at least 1,311 megawatts of new wind resources by the end of 2020; and building transmission in Wyoming to enable additional wind generation.
61

Invest in transmission infrastructure in the West and Midwest to support the integration of renewable energy onto the grid.

Support and advance the development of markets in the West to optimize the electric grid, lower costs, enhance reliability and more effectively integrate renewable sources.

New federal, regional, state and international accords, legislation, regulation, or judicial proceedings limiting GHG emissions could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants, the United States and the global economy. Companies and industries with higher GHG emissions, such as utilities with significant coal-fueled generating facilities, will be subject to more direct impacts and greater financial and regulatory risks. The impact is dependent on numerous factors, none of which can be meaningfully quantified at this time. These factors include, but are not limited to, the magnitude and timing of GHG emissions reduction requirements; the design of the requirements; the cost, availability and effectiveness of emissions control technology; the price, distribution method and availability of offsets and allowances used for compliance; government-imposed compliance costs; and the existence and nature of incremental cost recovery mechanisms. Examples of how new requirements may impact the Registrants include:
Additional costs may be incurred to purchase required emissions allowances under any market-based cap-and-trade system in excess of allocations that are received at no cost. These purchases would be necessary until new technologies could be developed and deployed to reduce emissions or lower carbon generation is available;
Acquiring and renewing construction and operating permits for new and existing generating facilities may be costly and difficult;
Additional costs may be incurred to purchase and deploy new generating technologies;
Costs may be incurred to retire existing coal-fueled generating facilities before the end of their otherwise useful lives or to convert them to burn fuels, such as natural gas or biomass, that result in lower emissions;
Operating costs may be higher and generating unit outputs may be lower;
Higher interest and financing costs and reduced access to capital markets may result to the extent that financial markets view climate change and GHG emissions as a greater business risk; and
The relevant Registrant's natural gas pipeline operations, electric transmission and retail sales may be impacted in response to changes in customer demand and requirements to reduce GHG emissions.

The impact of events or conditions caused by climate change, whether from natural processes or human activities, are uncertain and could vary widely, from highly localized to worldwide, and the extent to which a utility's operations may be affected is uncertain. Climate change may cause physical and financial risk through, among other things, sea level rise, changes in precipitation and extreme weather events. Consumer demand for energy may increase or decrease, based on overall changes in weather and as customers promote lower energy consumption through the continued use of energy efficiency programs or other means. Availability of resources to generate electricity, such as water for hydroelectric production and cooling purposes, may also be impacted by climate change and could influence the Registrants' existing and future electricity generating portfolio. These issues may have a direct impact on the costs of electricity production and increase the price customers pay or their demand for electricity.

Regional and State Activities

Several states have promulgated or otherwise participate in state-specific or regional laws or initiatives to report or mitigate GHG emissions. These are expected to impact the relevant Registrant, and include:

In June 2013, Nevada SB 123 was signed into law. Among other things, SB 123 and regulations thereunder require Nevada Power to file with the PUCN an emission reduction and capacity replacement plan by May 1, 2014. In May 2014, Nevada Power filed its emissions reduction capacity replacement plan. The plan provided for the retirement or elimination of 300 MW of coal generating capacity by December 31, 2014, another 250 MW of coal generating capacity by December 31, 2017, and another 250 MW of coal generating capacity by December 31, 2019, along with replacement of such capacity with a mixture of constructed, acquired or contracted renewable and non-technology specific generating units. The plan also sets forth the expected timeline and costs associated with decommissioning coal-fired generating units that will be retired or eliminated pursuant to the plan. The PUCN has the authority to approve or modify the emission reduction and capacity replacement plan filed by Nevada Power. Given the PUCN may recommend and/or approve variations to Nevada Power's resource plans relative to requirements under SB 123, the specific impacts of SB 123 on Nevada Power cannot be determined.

Under the authority of California's Global Warming Solutions Act, which includes a series of policies aimed at returning California greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, the California Air Resources Board adopted a GHG cap-and-trade program with an effective date of January 1, 2012; compliance obligations were imposed on entities beginning in 2013. PacifiCorp is subject to the cap-and-trade program as a retail service provider in California and an importer of wholesale energy into California. In 2015, Governor Jerry Brown issued an executive order to reduce emissions to 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80% by 2050. In September 2016, California Senate Bill 32 was signed into law establishing greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets of 40% below 1990 levels by 2030.

The states of California, Washington and Oregon have adopted GHG emissions performance standards for base load electricity generating resources. Under the laws in California and Oregon, the emissions performance standards provide that emissions must not exceed 1,100 pounds of carbon dioxide per MWh. Effective April 2013, Washington's amended emissions performance standards provide that GHG emissions for base load electricity generating resources must not exceed 970 pounds of carbon dioxide per MWh. These GHG emissions performance standards generally prohibit electric utilities from entering into long-term financial commitments (e.g., new ownership investments, upgrades, or new or renewed contracts with a term of five or more years) unless any base load generation supplied under long-term financial commitments comply with the GHG emissions performance standards.

Washington and Oregon enacted legislation in May 2007 and August 2007, respectively, establishing goals for the reduction of GHG emissions in their respective states. Washington's goals seek to (a) reduce emissions to 1990 levels by 2020; (b) reduce emissions to 25% below 1990 levels by 2035; and (c) reduce emissions to 50% below 1990 levels by 2050, or 70% below Washington's forecasted emissions in 2050. Oregon's goals seek to (a) cease the growth of Oregon GHG emissions by 2010; (b) reduce GHG levels to 10% below 1990 levels by 2020; and (c) reduce GHG levels to at least 75% below 1990 levels by 2050. Each state's legislation also calls for state government to develop policy recommendations in the future to assist in the monitoring and achievement of these goals.

In September 2016, the Washington State Department of Ecology issued a final rule regulating GHG emissions from sources in Washington. The rule regulates greenhouse gases including carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons and sulfur hexafluoride beginning in 2017 with three-year compliance periods thereafter (i.e., 2017-2019, 2020-2022, etc.). Under the rule, the Washington State Department of Ecology established GHG emissions reduction pathways for all covered entities. Covered entities may use emission reduction units, which may be traded with other covered entities, to meet their compliance requirements. PacifiCorp's resources that are covered under the rule include the Chehalis generating facility, which is a natural gas combined-cycle plant located in Washington state. PacifiCorp received its baseline emission order on December 17, 2017, which specified the emission reduction requirements for the Chehalis generating facility every three years beginning in 2017. The reduction requirements average 1.7% per year. However, the Washington State Department of Ecology suspended the compliance obligations of the Clean Air Rule after a Thurston County Superior Court judge ruled the state lacks authority to mandate reductions from indirect emitters. Pending further interpretation of the court’s decision by the Washington State Department of Ecology, entities subject to the rule are required to continue reporting emissions.
The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, a mandatory, market-based effort to reduce GHG emissions in ten Northeastern and Mid-Atlantic states, required, beginning in 2009, the reduction of carbon dioxide emissions from the power sector of 10% by 2018. In May 2011, New Jersey withdrew from participation in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative. Following a program review in 2012, the nine Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states implemented a new 2014 cap which was approximately 45% lower than the 2012-2013 cap. The cap is reduced each year by 2.5% from 2015 to 2020. As called for in the 2012 program review, a program review was initiated for 2016 and continues through 2017 with the expectation that states will implement program changes in the fourth control period from 2018 to 2020. In December 2017, an updated model rule was released by the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative states which includes an additional 30% regional cap reduction between 2020 and 2030.


GHG Litigation

Each Registrant closely monitors ongoing environmental litigation applicable to its respective operations. Numerous lawsuits have been unsuccessfully pursued against the industry that attempt to link GHG emissions to public or private harm. The lower courts initially refrained from adjudicating the cases under the "political question" doctrine, because of their inherently political nature. These cases have typically been appealed to federal appellate courts and, in certain circumstances, to the United States Supreme Court. In the U.S. Supreme Court's 2011 decision in the case of American Electric Power Co., Inc., et al. v. Connecticut et al., the court addressed the question of whether federal common law nuisance claims could be maintained against certain electric power companies' for their GHG emissions and require the setting of an emissions cap for the emitters. The court held that the Clean Air Act and the EPA actions it authorizes displace any federal common law right to seek abatement of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel-fired power plants. Recent efforts by the EPA to repeal the Clean Power Plan could increase the filing of common law nuisance lawsuits against emitters of GHG. Adverse rulings in GHG-related cases could result in increased or changed regulations and could increase costs for GHG emitters, including the Registrants' generating facilities.

The GHG rules, changes to those rules, and the Registrants' compliance requirements are subject to potential outcomes from proceedings and litigation challenging the rules.

Renewable Portfolio Standards

Each state's RPS described below could significantly impact the relevant Registrant's consolidated financial results. Resources that meet the qualifying electricity requirements under each RPS vary from state to state. Each state's RPS requires some form of compliance reporting and the relevant Registrant can be subject to penalties in the event of noncompliance. Each Registrant believes it is in material compliance with all applicable RPS laws and regulations.

Since 1997, NV Energy has been required to comply with a RPS. Current law requires the Nevada Utilities to meet 18% of their energy requirements with renewable resources for 2014, 20% for 2015 through 2019, 22% for 2020 and 2024, and 25% for 2025 and thereafter. The RPS also requires 5% of the portfolio requirement come from solar resources through 2015 and increasing to 6% in 2016. Nevada law also permits energy efficiency measures to be used to satisfy a portion of the RPS through 2025, subject to certain limitations.

Utah's Energy Resource and Carbon Emission Reduction Initiative provides that, beginning in the year 2025, 20% of adjusted retail electric sales of all Utah utilities be supplied by renewable energy, if it is cost effective. Retail electric sales will be adjusted by deducting the amount of generation from sources that produce zero or reduced carbon emissions, and for sales avoided as a result of energy efficiency and DSM programs. Qualifying renewable energy sources can be located anywhere within the WECC, and renewable energy credits can be used.

The Oregon Renewable Energy Act ("OREA") provides a comprehensive renewable energy policy and RPS for Oregon. Subject to certain exemptions and cost limitations established in the law, PacifiCorp and other qualifying electric utilities must meet minimum qualifying electricity requirements for electricity sold to retail customers of at least 5% in 2011 through 2014, 15% in 2015 through 2019, and 20% in 2020 through 2024. In March 2016, Oregon Senate Bill No. 1547-B, the Clean Electricity and Coal Transition Plan, was signed into law. Senate Bill No. 1547-B requires that coal-fueled resources are eliminated from Oregon's allocation of electricity by January 1, 2030, and increases the current RPS target from 25% in 2025 to 50% by 2040. Senate Bill No. 1547-B also implements new REC banking provisions, as well as the following interim RPS targets: 27% in 2025 through 2029, 35% in 2030 through 2034, 45% in 2035 through 2039, and 50% by 2040 and subsequent years. As required by the OREA, the OPUC has approved an automatic adjustment clause to allow an electric utility, including PacifiCorp, to recover prudently incurred costs of its investments in renewable energy generating facilities and associated transmission costs.

Washington's Energy Independence Act establishes a renewable energy target for qualifying electric utilities, including PacifiCorp. The requirements are 3% of retail sales by January 1, 2012 through 2015, 9% of retail sales by January 1, 2016 through 2019 and 15% of retail sales by January 1, 2020 and each year thereafter. In April 2013, Washington State Senate Bill No. 5400 ("SB 5400") was signed into law. SB 5400 expands the geographic area in which eligible renewable resources may be located to beyond the Pacific Northwest, allowing renewable resources located in all states served by PacifiCorp to qualify. SB 5400 also provides PacifiCorp with additional flexibility and options to meet Washington's renewable mandates.


The California RPS required all California retail sellers to procure an average of 20% of retail load from renewable resources by December 31, 2013, 25% by December 31, 2016 and 33% by December 31, 2020. In October 2015, California Senate Bill No. 350 was signed into law, which increased the current RPS requirement to 40% by December 31, 2024, 45% by December 31, 2027 and 50% by December 31, 2030. In December 2011, the CPUC adopted a decision confirming that multi-jurisdictional utilities, such as PacifiCorp, are not subject to the percentage limits within the three product content categories of RPS-eligible resources established by the legislation that have been imposed on other California retail sellers.

Water Quality Standards


The federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Clean Water Act")Act establishes the framework for maintaining and improving water quality in the United StatesU.S. through a program that regulates, among other things, discharges to and withdrawals from waterways. The Clean Water Act requires that cooling water intake structures reflect the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" to aquatic organisms. After significant litigation, the EPA released a proposed rule under §316(b) of the Clean Water Act to regulate cooling water intakes at existing facilities. The final rule was released in May 2014 and became effective in October 2014. Under the final rule, existing facilities that withdraw at least 25% of their water exclusively for cooling purposes and have a design intake flow of greater than two million gallons per day are required to reduce fish impingement (i.e., when fish and other aquatic organisms are trapped against screens when water is drawn into a facility's cooling system) by choosing one of seven options. Facilities that withdraw at least 125 million gallons of water per day from waters of the United StatesU.S. must also conduct studies to help their permitting authority determine what site-specific controls, if any, would be required to reduce entrainment of aquatic organisms (i.e., when organisms are drawn into the facility). PacifiCorp and MidAmerican Energy are assessing the options for compliance at their generating facilities impacted by the final rule and will complete impingement and entrainment studies. PacifiCorp's Dave Johnston generating facility and all of MidAmerican Energy's coal-fueled generating facilities, except Louisa, Ottumwa and Walter Scott, Jr. Unit 4, which have water cooling towers, withdraw more than 125 million gallons per day of water from waters of the United StatesU.S. for once-through cooling applications. PacifiCorp's Jim Bridger, Naughton, Gadsby, Hunter and Huntington generating facilities currently utilize closed cycle cooling towers but are designed to withdraw more than two million gallons of water per day. The standards are required to be met as soon as possible after the effective date of the final rule, but no later than eight years thereafter. The costs of compliance with the cooling water intake structure rule cannot be fully determined until the prescribed studies are conducted and the respective state environmental agencies review the studies to determine whether additional mitigation technologies should be applied. In the event thatIf PacifiCorp's or MidAmerican Energy's existing intake structures require modification, the costs are not anticipated to be significant to the consolidated financial statements. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are not impacted by the §316(b) final rule since they do not utilize once-through cooling water intake or discharge structures at any of their generating facilities. All of the Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific generating stations are designed to have either minimal or zero discharge; therefore, they are not impacted by the §316(b) final rule.


In November 2015, the EPA published final effluent limitation guidelines and standards for the steam electric power generating sector which, among other things, regulate the discharge of bottom ash transport water, fly ash transport water, combustion residual leachate and non-chemical metal cleaning wastes. These guidelines, which had not been revised since 1982, were revised in response to the EPA's concerns that the addition of controls for air emissions has changed the effluent discharged from coal- and natural gas-fueled generating facilities. Under the originally-promulgated guidelines, permitting authorities were required to include the new limits in each impacted facility's discharge permit upon renewal with the new limits to be met as soon as possible, beginningIn November 1, 2018 and fully implemented by December 31, 2023. On April 5, 2017, a request for reconsideration and administrative stay of the guidelines was filed with the EPA. The EPA granted the request for reconsideration on April 12, 2017, imposed an immediate administrative stay of compliance dates in the rule that had not passed judicial review and requested the court stay the pending litigation over the rule until September 12, 2017. On June 6, 2017,2019, the EPA proposed updates to extend many of the compliance deadlines that would otherwise occur2015 rule, specifically addressing flue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash transport water. The rule took effect in 2018 and on September 18, 2017, the EPA issued aDecember 2020. The final rule extending certain compliance dateschanges the technology-basis for treatment of flue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash transport water, limits until November 1, 2020.revises the voluntary incentives program for flue gas desulfurization wastewater, and adds subcategories for high-flow units, low utilization units, and those that will transition away from coal combustion by 2028. While most of the issues raised by this rule are already being addressed through the coal combustion residualsCCR rule and are not expected to impose significant additional requirements, on the facilities,Dave Johnston generating facility is impacted by the impactrule's bottom ash handling requirements at Units 1 and 2. The generating facility submitted notice to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality that it will either achieve a cessation of coal combustion at Units 1 and 2 by December 31, 2028, or install bottom ash transport treatment technology by December 31, 2025. The EPA anticipates proposing additional changes to the rule cannot be fully determined until the reconsideration action is complete and any judicial review is conducted.in spring 2023 to resolve outstanding issues from litigation.



In April 2014, the EPA and the United StatesU.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps of Engineers") issued a joint proposal to address "waters of the United States" to clarify protection under the Clean Water Act for streams and wetlands. The proposed rule comes as a result of United StatesU.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2001 and 2006 that created confusion regarding jurisdictional waters that were subject to permitting under either nationwide or individual permitting requirements. The final rule was released in May 2015 but is currently under appealwas appealed in multiple courts and a nationwide stay on the implementation of the rule was issued in October 2015. On January 13, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a petition to address jurisdictional challenges to the rule. The EPA plans to undertake a two-step process, with the first step to repeal the 2015 rule and the second step to carry out a notice-and-comment rulemaking in which a substantive re-evaluation of the definition of the "waters of the United States" will be undertaken. On July 27, 2017,June 9, 2021, the EPA and the Corps of Engineers issuedannounced their intention to again revise the definition of "waters of the United States." In December 2022, the agencies released a proposal to repeal the final rule and recodifyupdating the pre-existing rules pending issuancedefinition of a new rule and on November 16, 2017, the agencies proposed to extend the implementation day"waters of the United States." The final rule generally restores and is broader than the pre-2015 "waters of the United States" rule to 2020; neither ofdefinition and incorporates both the proposals has been finalized. On January 22, 2018, the"relatively permanent" and "significant nexus" standards from U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision related to the jurisdictional challenges to the rule, holding that federal district courts, rather than federal appeals courts, have proper jurisdiction to hear challenges to the rule and instructed the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to dismiss the petitions for review for lack of jurisdiction, clearing the way for imposition of the rule in certain states barring final action by the EPA to formalize the extension of the compliance deadline. Depending on the outcome of final action by the EPA and additional legal action, a variety of projects that otherwise would have qualified for streamlined permitting processes under nationwide or regional general permits will be required to undergo more lengthy and costly individual permit procedures based on an extension of waters that will be deemed jurisdictional. However, until the rule is fully litigated and finalized, the Registrants cannot determine whether projects that include construction and demolition will face more complex permitting issues, higher costs or increased requirements for compensatory mitigation.decisions.


Coal Combustion ByproductAsh Disposal


In May 2010,April 2015, the EPA released a proposedfinal rule to regulate the management and disposal of coal combustion byproductsresiduals (CCR) under the RCRA. The final rule was released by the EPA on December 19, 2014, was published in the Federal Register on April 17, 2015 and was effective on October 19, 2015. The final rule regulates coal combustion byproducts as non-hazardous waste under RCRA Subtitle D and establishes minimum nationwide standards for the disposal of coal combustion residuals.CCR. Under the final rule, surface impoundments and landfills utilized for coal combustion byproducts maywill need to be closed unless they can meet the more stringent regulatory requirements. The final rule requires regulated entities to post annual groundwater monitoring and corrective action reports. The first of these reports will be posted to the respective Registrant's coal combustion rule compliance data and information websites by March 2, 2018. Based on the results in those reports, additional action may be required under the rule.


62


At the time the rule was published in April 2015, PacifiCorp operated 18 surface impoundments and seven landfills that contained coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, nine surface impoundments and three landfills were either closed or repurposed to no longer receive coal combustion byproducts and hence are not subject to the final rule. As PacifiCorp proceeded to implement the final coal combustion rule, it was determined that two surface impoundments located at the Dave Johnston Generating Stationgenerating facility were hydraulically connected and effectively constitute a single impoundment. In November 2017, a new surface impoundment was placed into service at the Naughton Generating Station. At the time the rule was published in April 2015, MidAmerican Energy owned or operated nine surface impoundments and four landfills that contain coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, MidAmerican Energy closed or repurposed six surface impoundments to no longer receive coal combustion byproducts. Five of these surface impoundments were closed on or before December 21, 2017, and the sixth is undergoing closure. At the time the rule was published in April 2015, the Nevada Utilities operated ten10 evaporative surface impoundments and two landfills that contained coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, the Nevada Utilities closed four of the surface impoundments, four impoundments discontinued receipt of coal combustion byproducts making them inactive and two surface impoundments remain active and subject to the final rule. The two landfills remain active and subject to the final rule. Refer to Note 13 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for discussion of the impacts on asset retirement obligations as a result of the final rule.



Multiple parties filed challenges over various aspects of the final rule in the D.C. Circuit, in 2015, resulting in settlement of some of the issues and subsequent regulatory action by the EPA. The EPA including subjecting inactivefinalized the first phase of the CCR rule amendments in July 2018 (the "Phase 1, Part 1 rule"). In addition to adopting alternative performance standards and revising groundwater performance standards for certain constituents, the EPA extended the deadline by which facilities must initiate closure of unlined ash ponds exceeding a groundwater protection standard and impoundments that do not meet the rule's aquifer location restrictions to October 31, 2020. Following submittal of competing motions from environmental groups and the EPA to stay or remand this deadline extension, on March 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit granted the EPA's request to remand the rule and left the October 31, 2020 deadline in place while the agency undertakes a new rulemaking establishing a new deadline for initiating closure. On August 14, 2019, the EPA released its "Phase 2" proposal, which contains targeted amendments to the CCR rule in response to court remands and EPA settlement agreements, as well as issues raised in a rulemaking petition. The Phase 2 rule has not been finalized. In February 2020, the EPA proposed a federal CCR permit program as required by the WIIN Act of 2016. The federal permit rule has not been finalized. In October 2020, the EPA released an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on legacy CCR surface impoundments, seeking comment on and information related to regulation. On September 13, 2017,issues relevant to development of regulations for legacy impoundments. The EPA Administrator Pruitt issued a letterhas not undertaken additional rulemaking related to parties petitioning for administrative reconsideration of certain aspectsthe advanced notice. Until the proposals are finalized and fully litigated, the Registrants cannot determine whether additional action may be required.

In August 2020, the EPA finalized its Holistic Approach to Closure: Part A rule ("Part A rule"). This proposal addressed the D.C. Circuit's revocation of the coal combustion byproductsprovisions that allow unlined impoundments to continue receiving ash. The Part A rule concluding it was appropriateestablished a new deadline of April 11, 2021, by which all unlined surface impoundments must initiate closure. The Part A rule also identifies two extensions to that date: (1) a site-specific extension to develop alternate disposal capacity and initiate closure by October 15, 2023; and (2) a site-specific extension for facilities that agree to shut down the coal-fueled unit and complete ash pond closure activities by October 17, 2028. PacifiCorp developed a demonstration for the development of alternative capacity for the Jim Bridger facility's FGD Pond 2 and a demonstration for closure of the Naughton facility and ash pond and submitted them to the EPA in November 2020. On January 11, 2022, the public interest to reconsiderEPA deemed these submittals complete but has not taken additional action on them. No other Registrants used the provisions of the final rule addressed in the petitions. On September 27, 2017, the D.C. Circuit issued an order to the EPA requiring the agency to identify provisions of the rule that the agency intended to reconsider. The EPA submitted its list of potential issues to be reconsidered on November 15, 2017 and oral argument was held by the D.C. Circuit November 20, 2017 over certain portions of the finalPart A rule. The court has not yet issued a decision on the issues presented in the oral arguments. Separately, on August 10, 2017, the EPA issued proposed permitting guidance on how states' coal combustion residuals permit programs should comply with the requirements of the final rule as authorized under the December 2016 Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act. Utilizing that guidance, the state of Oklahoma submitted an application to the EPA for approval of its state program and, on January 16, 2018, the EPA proposed to approve the application. To date, none of the states in which the Registrants operate has submitted an application for approval of state permitting authority. The state of Utah adopted the federal final rule in September 2016, which required two landfills to submit permit applications by March 2017. It is anticipated that the state of Utah will submit an application for approval of its coal combustion residuals permit program prior to the end of 2018.


Notwithstanding the status of the final coal combustion residualsCCR rule, citizens' suits have been filed against regulated entities seeking judicial relief for contamination alleged to have been caused by releases of coal combustion byproducts. Some of these cases have been successful in imposing liability upon companies if coal combustion byproducts contaminate groundwater that is ultimately released or connected to surface water. In addition, actions have been filed against regulated entities seeking to require that surface impoundments containing coal combustion residualsCCR be subject to closure by removal rather than being allowed to effectuate closure in place as provided under the final rule. The Registrants are not a party to these lawsuits and until they are resolved, the Registrants cannot predict the impact on overall compliance obligations.


63


Other


Other laws, regulations and agencies to which the relevant Registrants are subject include, but are not limited to:
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and similar state laws may require any current or former owners or operators of a disposal site, as well as transporters or generators of hazardous substances sent to such disposal site, to share in environmental remediation costs. Certain Registrants have been identified as potentially responsible parties in connection with certain disposal sites. The relevant Registrants have completed several cleanup actions and are participating in ongoing investigations and remedial actions. Costs associated with these actions are not expected to be material and are expected to be found prudent and included in rates.
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, under which the United States Department of EnergyDOE is responsible for the selection and development of repositories for, and the permanent disposal of, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive wastes. Refer to Note 1314 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 1211 of the Notes to Financial Statements of MidAmerican Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding MidAmerican Energy's nuclear decommissioning obligations.
The federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and similar state statutes establish operational, reclamation and closure standards that must be met during and upon completion of PacifiCorp's mining activities.
The FERC evaluates hydroelectric systems to ensure environmental impacts are minimized, including the issuance of environmental impact statements for licensed projects both initially and upon relicensing. The FERC monitors the hydroelectric facilities for compliance with the license terms and conditions, which include environmental provisions. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 1314 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding the relicensing of PacifiCorp's Klamath River hydroelectric system.



The Registrants expect they will be allowed to recover their respective prudently incurred costs to comply with the environmental laws and regulations discussed above. The Registrants' planning efforts take into consideration the complexity of balancing factors such as: (a) pending environmental regulations and requirements to reduce emissions, address waste disposal, ensure water quality and protect wildlife; (b) avoidance of excessive reliance on any one generation technology; (c) costs and trade-offs of various resource options including energy efficiency, demand response programs and renewable generation; (d) state-specific energy policies, resource preferences and economic development efforts; (e) additional transmission investment to reduce power costs and increase efficiency and reliability of the integrated transmission system; and (f) keeping rates affordable. Due to the number of generating units impacted by environmental regulations, deferring installation of compliance-related projects is often not feasible or cost effective and places the Registrants at risk of not having access to necessary capital, material, and labor while attempting to perform major equipment installations in a compressed timeframe concurrent with other utilities across the country. Therefore, the Registrants have established installation schedules with permitting agencies that coordinate compliance timeframes with construction and tie-in of major environmental compliance projects as units are scheduled off-line for planned maintenance outages; these coordinated efforts help reduce costs associated with replacement power and maintain system reliability.



Item 1A.    Risk Factors


Each Registrant is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described below. Careful consideration of these risks, together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K and the other public information filed by the relevant Registrant, should be made before making an investment decision. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or which each Registrant currently deems immaterial may also impair its business operations. Unless stated otherwise, the risks described below generally relate to each Registrant.


64


Corporate and Financial Structure Risks


BHE is a holding company and depends on distributions from subsidiaries, including joint ventures, to meet its obligations.


BHE is a holding company with no material assets other than the ownership interests in its subsidiaries and joint ventures, collectively referred to as its subsidiaries. Accordingly, cash flows and the ability to meet BHE's obligations are largely dependent upon the earnings of its subsidiaries and the payment of such earnings to BHE in the form of dividends or other distributions. BHE's subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay amounts due pursuant to BHE's senior debt, junior subordinated debt or its other obligations, or to make funds available, whether by dividends or other payments, for the payment of amounts due pursuant to BHE's senior debt, junior subordinated debt or its other obligations, and do not guarantee the payment of any of its obligations. Distributions from subsidiaries may also be limited by:
their respective earnings, capital requirements, and required debt and preferred stock payments;
the satisfaction of certain terms contained in financing, ring-fencing or organizational documents; and
regulatory restrictions that limit the ability of BHE's regulated utility subsidiaries to distribute profits.


BHE is substantially leveraged, the terms of its existing senior and junior subordinated debt do not restrict the incurrence of additional debt by BHE or its subsidiaries, and BHE's senior debt is structurally subordinated to the debt of its subsidiaries, and each of such factors could adversely affect BHE's consolidated financial results.


A significant portion of BHE's capital structure is comprised of debt, and BHE expects to incur additional debt in the future to fund items such as, among others, acquisitions, capital investments and the development and construction of new or expanded facilities. As of December 31, 2017,2022, BHE had the following outstanding obligations:
senior unsecured debt of $6.5$14.0 billion;
junior subordinated debentures of $100 million;
short-term borrowings of $3.3 billion;
guarantees and letters of credit in respect of subsidiary andsubsidiaries, equity method investments and other related parties aggregating $332 million;$1.6 billion; and
commitments, subject to satisfaction of certain specified conditions, to provide equity contributions in support of renewable tax equity investments totaling $265 million.

BHE's consolidated subsidiaries also have significant amounts of outstanding debt, which totaled $29.8$38.4 billion as of December 31, 2017.2022. These amounts exclude (a) trade debt, (b) preferred stock obligations, (c) letters of credit in respect of subsidiary debt, and (d) BHE's share of the outstanding debt of its own or its subsidiaries' equity method investments.


Given BHE's substantial leverage, it may not have sufficient cash to service its debt, which could limit its ability to finance future acquisitions, develop and construct additional projects, or operate successfully under difficult conditions, including those brought on by adverse national and global economies, unfavorable financial markets or growth conditions where its capital needs may exceed its ability to fund them. BHE's leverage could also impair its credit quality or the credit quality of its subsidiaries, making it more difficult to finance operations or issue future debt on favorable terms, and could result in a downgrade in debt ratings by credit rating agencies.



The terms of BHE's and its subsidiaries' debt do not limit itsBHE's ability or the ability of its subsidiaries to incur additional debt or issue preferred stock. Accordingly, BHE or its subsidiaries could enter into acquisitions, new financings, refinancings, recapitalizations, capital leases or other highly leveraged transactions that could significantly increase BHE's or its subsidiaries' total amount of outstanding debt. The interest payments needed to service this increased level of debt could adversely affect BHE's consolidatedor its subsidiaries' financial results. Many of BHE's subsidiaries' debt agreements contain covenants, or may in the future contain covenants, that restrict or limit, among other things, such subsidiaries' ability to create liens, sell assets, make certain distributions, incur additional debt or miss contractual deadlines or requirements, and BHE's ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond its control. Further, if an event of default accelerates a repayment obligation and such acceleration results in an event of default under some or all of BHE's other debt, BHE may not have sufficient funds to repay all of the accelerated debt simultaneously, and the other risks described under "Corporate and Financial Structure Risks" may be magnified as well.


65


Because BHE is a holding company, the claims of its senior debt holders are structurally subordinated with respect to the assets and earnings of its subsidiaries. Therefore, the rights of its creditors to participate in the assets of any subsidiary in the event of a liquidation or reorganization are subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors and preferred shareholders, if any. In addition, pursuant to separate financing agreements, substantially all of PacifiCorp's electric utility properties, MidAmerican Energy's electric utility properties in the state of Iowa, Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's properties in the state of Nevada, AltaLink's transmission properties, the equity interest of MidAmerican Funding's subsidiary and substantially all of the assets of the subsidiaries of BHE Renewables that are direct or indirect owners of solar and wind generation projects, are directly or indirectly pledged to secure their financings and, therefore, may be unavailable as potential sources of repayment of BHE's debt.


A downgrade in BHE's credit ratings or the credit ratings of its subsidiaries, including the Subsidiary Registrants, could negatively affect BHE's or its subsidiaries' access to capital, increase the cost of borrowing or raise energy transaction credit support requirements.


BHE's senior unsecured debt and its subsidiaries' long-term debt, including the Subsidiary Registrants, are rated by various rating agencies. BHE cannot give assurance that its senior unsecured debt rating or any of its subsidiaries' long-term debt ratings will not be reduced in the future. Although none of the Registrants' outstanding debt has rating-downgrade triggers that would accelerate a repayment obligation, a credit rating downgrade would increase any such Registrant's borrowing costs and commitment fees on its revolving credit agreements and other financing arrangements, perhaps significantly. In addition, such Registrant would likely be required to pay a higher interest rate in future financings, and the potential pool of investors and funding sources would likely decrease. Further, access to the commercial paper market the principal source of short-term borrowings for each Registrant, could be significantly limited, resulting in higher interest costs.


Similarly, any downgrade or other event negatively affecting the credit ratings of BHE's subsidiaries could make their costs of borrowing higher or access to funding sources more limited, which in turn could cause BHE to provide liquidity in the form of capital contributions or loans to such subsidiaries, thus reducing its and its subsidiaries' liquidity and borrowing capacity.


Most of the Registrants' large wholesale customers, suppliers and counterparties require such Registrant to have sufficient creditworthiness in order to enter into transactions, particularly in the wholesale energy markets. If the credit ratings of a Registrant were to decline, especially below investment grade, the relevant Registrant's financing costs and borrowings would likely increase because certain counterparties may require collateral in the form of cash, a letter of credit or some other form of security for existing transactions and as a condition to entering into future transactions with such Registrant. Amounts maycould be material and maycould adversely affect such Registrant's liquidity and cash flows.


BHE's majority shareholder, Berkshire Hathaway, could exercise control over BHE in a manner that would benefit Berkshire Hathaway to the detriment of BHE's creditors and BHE could exercise control over the Subsidiary Registrants in a manner that would benefit BHE to the detriment of the Subsidiary Registrants' creditors and PacifiCorp's PacifiCorp'spreferred stockholders.


Berkshire Hathaway is majority owner of BHE and has control over all decisions requiring shareholder approval. In circumstances involving a conflict of interest between Berkshire Hathaway and BHE's creditors, Berkshire Hathaway could exercise its control in a manner that would benefit Berkshire Hathaway to the detriment of BHE's creditors.


BHE indirectly owns all of the common stock of PacifiCorp, Nevada Power, and Sierra Pacific and EGTS and the membership interest in Eastern Energy Gas. BHE is also the sole member of MidAmerican Funding and, accordingly, indirectly owns all of MidAmerican Energy's common stock. As a result, BHE has control over all decisions requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors. In circumstances involving a conflict of interest between BHE and the creditors of the Subsidiary Registrants, BHE could exercise its control in a manner that would benefit BHE to the detriment of the Subsidiary Registrants' creditors.



Business Risks


Much of BHE's growth has been achieved through acquisitions, and any such acquisition may not be successful.


Much of BHE's growth has been achieved through acquisitions. Future acquisitions may range from buying individual assets to the purchase of entire businesses. BHE will continue to investigate and pursue opportunities for future acquisitions that it believes, but cannot assure, you, may increase value and expand or complement existing businesses. BHE may participate in bidding or other negotiations at any time for such acquisition opportunities which may or may not be successful.


Any acquisition entails numerous risks, including, among others:
66

the failure to complete the transaction for various reasons, such as the inability to obtain the required regulatory approvals, materially adverse developments in the potential acquiree's business or financial condition or successful intervening offers by third parties;

the failure of the combined business to realize the expected benefits;
the risk that federal, state or foreign regulators or courts could require regulatory commitments or other actions in respect of acquired assets, potentially including programs, contributions, investments, divestitures and market mitigation measures;
the risk of unexpected or unidentified issues not discovered in the diligence process; and
the need for substantial additional capital and financial investments.

An acquisition could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of BHE's subsidiaries. In addition, the final orders of regulatory authorities approving acquisitions may be subject to appeal by third parties. The diversion of BHE management's attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the approval and integration of the acquired operations could adversely affect BHE's combined businesses and financial results and could impair its ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.


BHE cannot assure you that future acquisitions, if any, or any integration efforts will be successful, or that BHE's ability to repay its obligations will not be adversely affected by any future acquisitions.


The Registrants are subject to operating uncertainties and events beyond each respective Registrant's control that impact the costs to operate, maintain, repair and replace utility and interstate natural gas pipeline systems and the ability to self-insure many risks, which could adversely affect each respective Registrant's consolidated financial results.


The operation of complex utility systems or interstate natural gas pipeline and storage systems that are spread over large geographic areas involves many operating uncertainties and events beyond each respective Registrant's control. These potential events include the breakdown or failure of the Registrants' thermal, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind and other electricity generating facilities and related equipment, compressors, pipelines, transmission and distribution lines and associated electric operations equipment or other equipment or processes, which could lead to catastrophic events; unscheduled outages; strikes, lockouts, or other labor-related actions;actions or shortages of qualified labor;labor, including with respect to the Registrants' suppliers and vendors; transmission and distribution system constraints; failure to obtain, renew or maintain rights-of-way, easements and leases on United StatesU.S. federal, Native American, First Nations or tribal lands; terrorist activities or military or other actions, including cyber attacks; fuel shortages or interruptions; unavailability of critical equipment, materials and supplies; low water flows and other weather-related impacts; performance below expected levels of output, capacity or efficiency; operator error; third partythird-party excavation errors; unexpected degradation of pipeline systems; design, construction or manufacturing defects; and catastrophic events such as severe storms, floods, fires, extreme temperature events, wind events, earthquakes, explosions, landslides, an electromagnetic pulse, mining incidents, costly litigation, wars, terrorism, pandemics and embargoes. A catastrophic event might result in injury or loss of life, extensive property damage, or environmental or natural resource damages.damages or excessive economic loss. For example, in the event of an uncontrolled release of water at one of PacifiCorp's high hazard potential hydroelectric dams, it is probable that loss of human life, disruption of lifeline facilities and property damage could occur in the downstream population and civil or other penalties could be imposed by the FERC. The extent of that liability would be determined by the applicable state law where any such damage occurred. Any of these events or other operational events could significantly reduce or eliminate the relevant Registrant's revenue or significantly increase its expenses, thereby reducing the availability of distributions to BHE. For example, if the relevant Registrant cannot operate its electricity or natural gas facilities at full capacity due to damage caused by a catastrophic event, its revenue could decrease and its expenses could increase due to the need to obtain energy from more expensive sources.

Further, the Registrants self-insure many risks, and current and future insurance coverage may not be sufficient to replace lost revenue or cover repair and replacement costs.costs or other damages. The scope, cost and availability of each Registrant's insurance coverage may change, including the portion that is self-insured.

Any reduction of each Registrant's revenue or increase in its expenses resulting from the risks described above, could adversely affect the relevant Registrant's consolidated financial results.


The Registrants are subject to increasing risks from catastrophic wildfires and may be unable to obtain enough insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or at all and insurance coverage on existing wildfire claims could be insufficient to cover all losses should current estimates of those losses materially differ from the ultimate outcomes of the claims, all of which could materially affect the Registrants financial results and liquidity.

The risk of catastrophic and severe wildfires has increased in the western U.S. giving rise to the potential for large damage claims against utilities for fire-related losses. Catastrophic and severe wildfires can occur in PacifiCorp, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific's ("Western Domestic Utilities") service territories even when the Western Domestic Utilities effectively implement their wildfire mitigation plans and prudently manage their systems.

67


In California, for example, where PacifiCorp operates, "inverse condemnation" currently exposes utilities to potential liability for property damages where the utility's electrical equipment was a substantial cause of the wildfire. California courts have held that utilities can be held liable under inverse condemnation without being found negligent and regardless of fault. California law also permits inverse condemnation plaintiffs to recover attorney's fees. As a result of inverse condemnation being applied to utilities and wildfire damages, recent losses recorded by insurance companies, and the risk of an increase in the frequency, duration and size of wildfires, insurance for wildfire liabilities may not be available or may be available only at rates that are prohibitively expensive. In addition, even if insurance for wildfire liabilities is available, it may not be available in amounts necessary to cover potential losses. Uninsured losses and increases in the cost of insurance may be challenged when PacifiCorp seeks cost recovery and may not be recoverable in customer rates.

The Western Domestic Utilities monitor weather conditions with specific thresholds for designated high fire consequence areas to help ensure the safe and reliable operation of their systems during periods of elevated wildfire ignition risk. Should weather conditions become extreme, the Western Domestic Utilities may de-energize certain sections of their transmission and distribution facilities as a last resort to minimize risk to the public. These "public safety power shutoffs" could be subject to increased scrutiny by regulators and policy makers. And, although "public safety power shutoffs" are intended to minimize risk of wildfire ignition, de-energization may cause other damages for which the Western Domestic Utilities could be held liable.

Damage claims against PacifiCorp for wildfires may materially affect its financial condition and results of operations.

In September 2020, a severe weather event resulting in high winds, low humidity and warm temperatures contributed to several major wildfires, private and public property damages, personal injuries and loss of life and widespread power outages in Oregon and Northern California (the "2020 Wildfires"). Additionally, a major wildfire began in PacifiCorp's service territory in July 2022 causing private and public property damage, personal injuries, loss of life and power outages in Northern California (the "2022 McKinney Fire"). The wildfires spread across certain parts of PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas across multiple counties in Oregon and California. Investigations into the cause and origin of each wildfire are complex and ongoing. Several lawsuits and complaints have been filed in Oregon and California associated with the wildfires, and it is possible that additional lawsuits and complaints against PacifiCorp may be filed. If PacifiCorp is found liable for damages related to the 2020 Wildfires or the 2022 McKinney Fire and is unable to, or believes that it will be unable to, recover those damages through insurance or customer rates, or access the bank and capital markets on reasonable terms, PacifiCorp's financial results could be adversely affected. Refer to Item 3. Legal Proceedings, BHE's Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and PacifiCorp's Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire.

Each Registrant's business could be adversely affected by epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks.

Each Registrant's business could be adversely affected by epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks generally and more specifically in the markets in which we operate, including, without limitation, if each Registrant's utility customers experience decreases in demand for their products and services or otherwise reduce their consumption of electricity or natural gas that the respective Registrant supplies, or if such Registrant experiences material payment defaults by its customers. In addition, each Registrant's results and financial condition may be adversely affected by federal, state or local and foreign legislation related to such epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks (or other similar laws, regulations, orders or other governmental or regulatory actions) that would impose a moratorium on terminating electric or natural gas utility services, including related assessment of late fees, due to non-payment or other circumstances. Additionally, HomeServices' real estate businesses could experience a decline (which could be significant) in real estate transactions if potential customers elect to defer purchases in reaction to any epidemic, pandemic or other outbreak or due to general economic uncertainty such as high unemployment levels, in some or all of the real estate markets in which HomeServices operates. The government and regulators could impose other requirements on each Registrant's business that could have an adverse impact on such Registrant's financial results.

Further, epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks could disrupt supply chains (including supply chains for energy generation, steel or transmission wire) relating to the markets each Registrant serves, which could adversely impact such Registrant's ability to generate or supply power. In addition, such disruptions to the supply chain could delay certain construction and other capital expenditure projects, including construction and repowering of the Registrants' renewable generation projects. Such disruptions could adversely affect the impacted Registrant's future financial results.

Such declines in demand, any inability to generate or supply power or delays in capital projects could also significantly reduce cash flows at BHE's subsidiaries, thereby reducing the availability of distributions to BHE, which could adversely affect its financial results.

68


Each Registrant is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign legislation and regulation, including numerous environmental, health, safety, reliability, data privacy and other laws and regulations that affect its operations and costs. These laws and regulations are complex, dynamic and subject to new interpretations or change. In addition, new laws and regulations, including initiatives regarding deregulation and restructuring of the utility industry, are continually being proposed and enacted that impose new or revised requirements or standards on each Registrant.


Each Registrant is required to comply with numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations as described in "General Regulation" and "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K that have broad application to each Registrant and limits the respective Registrant's ability to independently make and implement management decisions regarding, among other items, acquiring businesses; constructing, acquiring, disposing or disposing ofretiring operating assets; operating and maintaining generating facilities and transmission and distribution system assets; complying with pipeline safety and integrity and environmental requirements; setting rates charged to customers; establishing capital structures and issuing debt or equity securities; transactingmanaging and reporting transactions between subsidiaries and affiliates; and paying dividends or similar distributions. These laws and regulations, which are followed in developing the Registrants' safety and compliance programs and procedures, are implemented and enforced by federal, state and local regulatory agencies, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the FERC, the EPA, the DOT, the NRC, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration and various state regulatory commissions in the United States,U.S., and by foreign regulatory agencies, such as GEMA, which discharges certain of its powers through its staff within Ofgem, in Great Britain and the AUC in Alberta, Canada.


Compliance with applicable laws and regulations generally requires each Registrant to obtain and comply with a wide variety of licenses, permits, inspections, audits and other approvals. Further, compliance with laws and regulations can require significant capital and operating expenditures, including expenditures for new equipment, inspection, cleanup costs, removal and remediation costs and damages arising out of contaminated properties. Compliance activities pursuant to existing or new laws and regulations could be prohibitively expensive or otherwise uneconomical. As a result, each Registrant could be required to shut down some facilities or materially alter its operations. Further, each Registrant may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental or other regulatory approvals and permits for its operating assets or development projects. Delays in, or active opposition by third parties to, obtaining any required environmental or regulatory authorizations or failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the authorizations may increase costs or prevent or delay each Registrant from operating its facilities, developing or favorably locating new facilities or expanding existing facilities. If any Registrant fails to comply with any environmental or other regulatory requirements, such Registrant may be subject to penalties and fines or other sanctions, including changes to the way its electricity generating facilities are operated that may adversely impact generation or how the Pipeline Companies are permitted to operate their systems that may adversely impact throughput. The costs of complying with laws and regulations could adversely affect each Registrant's consolidated financial results. Not being able to operate existing facilities or develop new generating facilities to meet customer electricity needs could require such Registrant to increase its purchases of electricity on the wholesale market, which could increase market and price risks and adversely affect such Registrant's consolidated financial results.


Existing laws and regulations, while comprehensive, are subject to changes and revisions from ongoing policy initiatives by legislators and regulators and to interpretations that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. For example, changes in laws and regulations could result in, but are not limited to, increased competition and decreased revenuesrevenue within each Registrant's service territories, such as the Nevada Energy Choice Initiative;territories; new environmental requirements, including the implementation of or changes to the Affordable Clean Power Plan,Energy rule, RPS and GHG emissions reduction goals; the issuance of new or stricter air quality standards; the implementation of energy efficiency mandates; the issuance of regulations governing the management and disposal of coal combustion byproducts; changes in forecasting requirements; changes to each Registrant's service territories as a result of condemnation or takeover by municipalities or other governmental entities, particularly where it lacks the exclusive right to serve its customers; the inability of each Registrant to recover its costs on a timely basis, if at all; new pipeline safety requirements; or a negative impact on each Registrant's current transportation and cost recovery arrangements. In addition to changes in existing legislation and regulation, new laws and regulations are likely to be enacted from time to time that impose additional or new requirements or standards on each Registrant. For example, in April 2022, the EPA proposed the "Cross-State Ozone Transport Rule", which contains requirements intended to address ozone transport between states through federally required nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fuel generating facilities. The rule included Wyoming, Utah and Nevada for the first time. If finalized as proposed, the rule will have impacts on PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities in both Utah and Wyoming that do not have an SCR as early as 2026 and threatens early coal-fueled unit retirements and reliability impacts. PacifiCorp has engaged with state and federal agencies to make adjustments to the rule and mitigate potential reliability impacts. Adverse rulings in GHG-related cases could result in increased or changed regulations and could increase costs for GHG emitters, including the Registrants' generating facilities. The GHG rules, changes to those rules, and the Registrants' compliance requirements are subject to potential outcomes from proceedings and litigation challenging the rules.



69


New federal, regional, state and international accords, legislation, regulation, or judicial proceedings limiting GHG emissions could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants, the U.S. and the global economy. Companies and industries with higher GHG emissions, such as utilities with significant coal-fueled generating facilities, will be subject to more direct impacts and greater financial and regulatory risks. The impact is dependent on numerous factors, none of which can be meaningfully quantified at this time. These factors include, but are not limited to, the magnitude and timing of GHG emissions reduction requirements; the design of the requirements; the cost, availability and effectiveness of emissions control technology; the price, distribution method and availability of offsets and allowances used for compliance; government-imposed compliance costs; and the existence and nature of incremental cost recovery mechanisms. Examples of how new requirements may impact the Registrants include:

Additional costs may be incurred to purchase required emissions allowances under any market-based cap-and-trade system in excess of allocations that are received at no cost. These purchases would be necessary until new technologies could be developed and deployed to reduce emissions or lower carbon generation is available;
Acquiring and renewing construction and operating permits for new and existing generating facilities may be costly and difficult;
Additional costs may be incurred to purchase and deploy new generating technologies;
Costs may be incurred to retire existing coal-fueled generating facilities before the end of their otherwise useful lives or to convert them to burn fuels, such as natural gas or biomass, that result in lower emissions;
Operating costs may be higher and generating unit outputs may be lower;
Higher interest and financing costs and reduced access to capital markets may result to the extent that financial markets view climate change and GHG emissions as a greater business risk; and
The relevant Registrant's natural gas pipeline operations and capacity sales, electric transmission and retail sales may be impacted in response to changes in customer demand and requirements to reduce GHG emissions.

The impact of events or conditions caused by climate change, whether from natural processes or human activities, are uncertain and could vary widely, from highly localized to worldwide, and the extent to which a utility's operations may be affected is uncertain. Climate change may cause physical and financial risks through, among other things, sea level rise, changes in precipitation and extreme weather events. Consumer demand for energy may increase or decrease, based on overall changes in weather and as customers promote lower energy consumption through the continued use of energy efficiency programs or other means. Availability of resources to generate electricity, such as water for hydroelectric production and cooling purposes, may also be impacted by climate change and could influence the Registrants' existing and future electricity generating portfolio. These issues may have a direct impact on the costs of electricity production and increase the price customers pay or their demand for electricity.

Implementing actions required under, and otherwise complying with, new federal and state laws and regulations and changes in existing ones are among the most challenging aspects of managing utility operations. The Registrants cannot accurately predict the type or scope of future laws and regulations that may be enacted, changes in existing ones or new interpretations by agency orders or court decisions, nor can each Registrant determine their impact on it at this time; however, any one of these could adversely affect each Registrant's consolidated financial results through higher capital expenditures and operating costs, and early closure of generating facilities or lower tax benefits or restrict or otherwise cause an adverse change in how each Registrant operates its business. To the extent that each Registrant is not allowed by its regulators to recover or cannot otherwise recover the costs to comply with new laws and regulations or changes in existing ones, the costs of complying with such additional requirements could have a material adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's consolidated financial results. Additionally, even if such costs are recoverable in rates, if they are substantial and result in rates increasing to levels that substantially reduce customer demand, this could have a material adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's consolidated financial results. The Registrants have made their best estimate regarding the impact of the 2017 Tax Reform and the probability and timing of settlements of net regulatory liabilities established pursuant to the 2017 Tax Reform. However, the amount and timing of the settlements may change based on decisions and actions by each Registrant's regulators, which could have an effect on the relevant Registrant's consolidated financial results.


Recovery of costs and certain activities by each Registrant is subject to regulatory review and approval, and the inability to recover costs or undertake certain activities may adversely affect each Registrant's consolidated financial results.


State Regulatory Rate Review Proceedings


The Utilities establish rates for their regulated retail service through state regulatory proceedings. These proceedings typically involve multiple parties, including government bodies and officials, consumer advocacy groups and various consumers of energy, who have differing concerns but generally have the common objective of limiting rate increases or requesting rate decreases while also requiring the Utilities to ensure system reliability. Decisions are subject to judicial appeal, potentially leading to further uncertainty associated with the approval proceedings.

70


States set retail rates based in part upon the state regulatory commission's acceptance of an allocated share of total utility costs. When states adopt different methods to calculate interjurisdictional cost allocations, some costs may not be incorporated into rates of any state or other jurisdiction. Ratemaking is also generally done on the basis of estimates of normalized costs, so if a given year's realized costs are higher than normalized costs, rates may not be sufficient to cover those costs. In some cases, actual costs are lower than the normalized or estimated costs recovered through rates and from time-to-time may result in a state regulator requiring refunds to customers. Each state regulatory commission generally sets rates based on a test year established in accordance with that commission's policies. The test year data adopted by each state regulatory commission may create a lag between the incurrence of a cost and its recovery in rates. Each state regulatory commission also decides the allowed levels of expense, investment and capital structure that it deems are just and reasonableprudently incurred in providing the service and may disallow recovery in rates for any costs that it believes do not meet such standard. Additionally, each state regulatory commission establishes the allowed rate of return the Utilities will be given an opportunity to earn on their sources of capital. While rate regulation is premised on providing a fair opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, the state regulatory commissions do not guarantee that each Registrant will be able to realize the allowed rate of return.return or recover all of its costs even if it believes such costs to be prudently incurred.


Energy cost increasesSome state regulatory commissions have authorized recovery of certain costs above the level assumed in establishing base rates through adjustment mechanisms, which may be subject to customer sharing. Any significant increase in fuel costs for electricity generation or purchased electricity costs could have a negative impact on the Utilities, despite efforts to minimize this impact through the use of hedging contracts and sharingadjustment mechanisms or through future general regulatory rate reviews. Any of these consequences could adversely affect each Registrant's consolidated financial results.



FERC Jurisdiction


The FERC authorizes cost-based rates associated with transmission services provided by the Utilities' transmission facilities. Under the Federal Power Act, the Utilities, or MISO as it relates to MidAmerican Energy, may voluntarily file, or may be obligated to file, for changes, including general rate changes, to their system-wide transmission service rates. General rate changes implemented may be subject to refund. The FERC also has responsibility for approving both cost- and market-based rates under which the Utilities sell electricity atin the wholesale market, has jurisdiction over most of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities and has broad jurisdiction over energy markets. The FERC may impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address some of the volatility of these markets or could revoke or restrict the ability of the Utilities to sell electricity at market-based rates, which could adversely affect each Registrant's consolidated financial results. The FERC also maintains rules concerning standards of conduct, affiliate restrictions, interlocking directorates and cross-subsidization. As a transmission owning member of MISO, MidAmerican Energy is also subject to MISO-directed modifications of market rules, which are subject to FERC approval and operational procedures. As participants in EIM, PacifiCorp, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are also subject to applicable California ISO rules, which are subject to FERC approval and operational procedures. The FERC may also impose substantial civil penalties for any non-compliance with the Federal Power Act and the FERC's rules and orders.


The NERC has standards in place to ensure the reliability of the electric generation system and transmission grid. The Utilities are subject to the NERC's regulations and periodic audits to ensure compliance with those regulations. The NERC may carry out enforcement actions for non-compliance and administer significant financial penalties, subject to the FERC's review.


The FERC has jurisdiction over, among other things, the construction, abandonment, modification and operation of natural gas pipelines and related facilities used in the transportation, storage and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce, including all rates, charges and terms and conditions of service. The FERC also has market transparency authority and has adopted additional reporting and internet posting requirements for natural gas pipelines and buyers and sellers of natural gas.


Rates for the interstate natural gas transmission and storage operations at the Pipeline Companies, which include reservation, commodity, surcharges, fuel and gas lost and unaccounted for charges, are authorized by the FERC. In accordance with the FERC's rate-makingratemaking principles, the Pipeline Companies' current maximum tariff rates are designed to recover prudently incurred costs included in their pipeline system's regulatory cost of service that are associated with the construction, operation and maintenance of their pipeline system and to afford the Pipeline Companies an opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return. Nevertheless, the rates the FERC authorizes the Pipeline Companies to charge their customers may not be sufficient to recover the costs incurred to provide services in any given period. Moreover, from time to time, the FERC may change, alter or refine its policies or methodologies for establishing pipeline rates and terms and conditions of service. In addition, the FERC has the authority under Section 5 of the Natural Gas Act of 1938 ("NGA") to investigate whether a pipeline may be earning more than its allowed rate of return and, when appropriate, to institute proceedings against such pipeline to prospectively reduce rates. Any such proceedings, if instituted, could result in significantly adverse rate decreases.


71


Under FERC policy, interstate pipelines and their customers may execute contracts at negotiated rates, which may be above or below the maximum tariff rate for that service or the pipeline may agree to provide a discounted rate, which would be a rate between the maximum and minimum tariff rates. In a rate proceeding, rates in these contracts are generally not subject to adjustment. It is possible that the cost to perform services under negotiated or discounted rate contracts will exceed the cost used in the determination of the negotiated or discounted rates, which could result either in losses or lower rates of return for providing such services. Under certain circumstances, FERC policy allows interstate natural gas pipelines to design new maximum tariff rates to recover such costs in regulatory rate reviews. However, with respect to discounts granted to affiliates, the interstate natural gas pipeline must demonstrate that the discounted rate was necessary in order to meet competition.


GEMA Jurisdiction


The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, as Distribution Network Operators ("DNOs")DNOs and holders of electricity distribution licenses, are subject to regulation by GEMA. Most of the revenue of a DNO is controlled by a distribution price control formula set out in the electricity distribution license. The price control formula does not directly constrain profits from year to year,year-to-year but is a control on revenue that operates independentlyindependent of a significant portion of the DNO's actual costs. A resetting of the formula does not require the consent of the DNO, but if a licensee disagrees with a change to its license, it can appeal the matter to the United Kingdom's Competition and Markets Authority.CMA. GEMA is able to impose financial penalties on DNOs that contravene any of their electricity distribution license duties or certain of their duties under British law or fail to achieve satisfactory performance of individual standards prescribed by GEMA. Any penalty imposed must be reasonable and may not exceed 10% of the DNO's revenue. During the term of any price control, additional costs have a direct impact on the financial results of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies.



AUC Jurisdiction


The AUC is an independent, quasi-judicial agency established by the province of Alberta, Canada, which is responsible for, among other things, approving the tariffs of transmission facility owners, including ALP,AltaLink, and distribution utilities, acquisitions of such transmission facility owners or utilities, and construction and operation of new transmission projects in Alberta. The AUC also investigates and rules on regulated rate disputes and system access problems.


The AUC regulates and oversees Alberta's electricity transmission sector with broad authority that may impact many of ALP'sAltaLink's activities, including its tariffs, rates, construction, operations and financing. The AUC has various core functions in regulating the Alberta electricity transmission sector, including the following:
regulating and adjudicating issues related to the operation of electric utilities within Alberta;
processing and approving general tariff applications relating to revenue requirements, capital expenditure prudency and rates of return including deemed capital structure for regulated utilities while ensuring that utility rates are just and reasonable and approval of the transmission tariff rates of regulated transmission providers paid by the AESO, which is the independent transmission system operator in Alberta, Canada that controls the operation of AltaLink's transmission system;
approving the need for new electricity transmission facilities and permits to build and licenses to operate electricity transmission facilities;
reviewing operations and accounts from electric utilities and conducting on-site inspections to ensure compliance with industry regulationregulations and standards;
adjudicating enforcement issues including the imposition of administrative penalties that arise when market participants violate the rules of the AESO; and
collecting, storing, analyzing, appraising and disseminating information to effectively fulfill its duties as an industry regulator.


In addition, AUC approval is required in connection with new energy and regulated utility initiatives in Alberta, amendments to existing approvals and financing proposals by designated utilities.


The AESO determines the need and plans for the expansion and enhancement of a congestion free transmission system in Alberta in accordance with applicable law and reliability standards. The AESO's responsibilities include long-term transmission planning and management, including assessing and planning for the current and future transmission system capacity needs of AESO market participants. When AESO determines an expansion or enhancement of the transmission system is needed, with limited exceptions, it submits an application to the AUC for approval of the proposed expansion or enhancement. The AESO then determines which transmission provider should submit an application to the AUC for a permit and license to construct and operate the designated transmission facilities. Generally the transmission provider operating in the geographic area where the transmission facilities expansion or enhancement is to be located is selected by the AESO to build, own and operate the transmission facilities. In addition, Alberta law provides that transmission projects may be subject to a competitive process open to qualifying bidders. In either case, there can be no assurance that any jurisdictional market participant that BHE may own, including AltaLink, will be selected by the AESO to build, own and operate transmission facilities, even if BHE's market participant operates in the relevant geographic area, or that BHE's market participant will be successful in any such competitive process in which it may participate.
72



Physical or cyber attacks, both threatened and actual, could impact each Registrant's operations and could adversely affect its consolidated financial results.


Each Registrant relies on information technology in virtually all aspects of its business. Like those of many large businesses, certain of the Registrant's technology systems have been subject to computer viruses, malicious codes, unauthorized access, phishing efforts, denial-of-service attacks and other cyber attacks and each Registrant expects to be subject to similar attacks in the future as such attacks become more sophisticated and frequent. A significant disruption or failure of its information technology systems by physical or cyber attack could result in service interruptions, safety failures, security violations,events, regulatory compliance failures, an inability to protect sensitive corporate and customer information and assets against intruders,unauthorized users, and other operational difficulties. Attacks perpetrated against each Registrant's information systems could result in loss of assets and critical information and expose it to remediation costs and reputational damage.


Although the Registrants have taken steps intended to mitigate these risks, a significant disruption or cyber intrusion at one or more of each Registrant's operations could lead to misappropriation of assets or data corruption.adversely affect the impacted Registrant's financial results. Cyber attacks could further adversely affect each Registrant's ability to operate facilities, information technology and business systems, or compromise sensitive customer and employee information. In addition, physical or cyber attacks against key suppliers or service providers could have a similar effect on each Registrant. Additionally, if each Registrant is unable to acquire, develop, implement, adopt or implementprotect rights around new technology, it may suffer a competitive disadvantage, which could also have an adverse effect on its results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. Any of these items could adversely affect each Registrant's results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.disadvantage.


Each Registrant is actively pursuing, developing and constructing new or expanded facilities, the completion and expected costs of which are subject to significant risk, and each Registrant has significant funding needs related to its planned capital expenditures.


Each Registrant actively pursues, develops and constructs new or expanded facilities. Each Registrant expects to incur significant annual capital expenditures over the next several years. Such expenditures may include construction and other costs for new electricity generating facilities, electric transmission or distribution projects, environmental control and compliance systems, natural gas storage facilities, new or expanded pipeline systems, and continued maintenance and upgrades of existing assets.


Development and construction of major facilities are subject to substantial risks, including fluctuations in the price and availability of commodities, manufactured goods, equipment, and the imposition of tariffs thereon when sourced by foreign providers, labor, siting and permitting and changes in environmental and operational compliance matters, load forecasts and other items over a multi-year construction period, as well as counterparty risk and the economic viability of the Registrants' suppliers, customers and contractors. Certain of the Registrants' construction projects are substantially dependent upon a single supplier or contractor and replacement of such supplier or contractor may be difficult and cannot be assured. These risks may result in the inability to timely complete a project or higher than expected costs to complete an asset and place it in-service and, in extreme cases, the loss of the power purchase agreements or other long-term off-take contracts underlying such projects. Such costs may not be recoverable in the regulated rates or market or contract prices each Registrant is able to charge its customers. Delays in construction of renewable projects may result in delayed in-service dates which may result in the loss of anticipated revenue or income tax benefits. It is also possible that additional generation needs may be obtained through power purchase agreements, which could increase long-term purchase obligations and force reliance on the operating performance of a third party. The inability to successfully and timely complete a project, avoid unexpected costs or recover any such costs could adversely affect such Registrant's consolidated financial results.


Furthermore, each Registrant depends upon both internal and external sources of liquidity to provide working capital and to fund capital requirements. If BHE does not provide needed funding to its subsidiaries and the subsidiaries are unable to obtain funding from external sources, they may need to postpone or cancel planned capital expenditures.


A significant sustained decrease in demand for electricity or natural gas in the markets served by each Registrant would decrease its operating revenue, could impact its planned capital expenditures and could adversely affect its consolidated financial results.


A significant sustained decrease in demand for electricity or natural gas in the markets served by each Registrant would decrease its operating revenue, could impact its planned capital expenditures and could adversely affect its consolidated financial results. Factors that could lead to a decrease in market demand include, among others:
a depression, recession or other adverse economic condition that results in a lower level of economic activity or reduced spending by consumers on electricity or natural gas;
an increase in the market price of electricity or natural gas or a decrease in the price of other competing forms of energy;
73


shifts in competitively priced natural gas supply sources away from the sources connected to the Pipeline Companies' systems, including shale gas sources;
efforts by customers, legislators and regulators to reduce the consumption of electricity generated or distributed by each Registrant through various existing laws and regulations, as well as, deregulation, conservation, energy efficiency and private generation measures and programs;
laws mandating or encouraging renewable energy sources, which may decrease the demand for electricity and natural gas or change the market prices of these commodities;
higher fuel taxes or other governmental or regulatory actions that increase, directly or indirectly, the cost of natural gas or other fuel sources for electricity generation or that limit the use of natural gas or the generation of electricity from fossil fuels;
a shift to more energy-efficient or alternative fuel machinery or an improvement in fuel economy, whether as a result of technological advances by manufacturers, legislation mandating higher fuel economy or lower emissions, price differentials, incentives or otherwise;
a reduction in the state or federal subsidies or tax incentives that are provided to agricultural, industrial or other customers, or a significant sustained change in prices for commodities such as ethanol or corn for ethanol manufacturers; and
sustained mild weather that reduces heating or cooling needs.


Each Registrant's operating results may fluctuate on a seasonal and quarterly basis and may be adversely affected by weather.


In most parts of the United StatesU.S. and other markets in which each Registrant operates, demand for electricity peaks during the summer months when irrigation and cooling needs are higher. Market prices for electricity also generally peak at that time. In other areas, including the western portion of PacifiCorp's service territory, demand for electricity peaks during the winter when heating needs are higher. In addition, demand for natural gas and other fuels generally peaks during the winter. This is especially true in MidAmerican Energy's and Sierra Pacific's retail natural gas businesses. Further, extreme weather conditions, such as heat waves, winter storms or floods could cause these seasonal fluctuations to be more pronounced. Periods of low rainfall or snowpack may negatively impact electricity generation at PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities, which may result in greater purchases of electricity from the wholesale market or from other sources at market prices. Additionally, PacifiCorp and MidAmerican Energy have added substantial wind-powered generating capacity, and BHE's unregulated subsidiaries are adding solarsolar-powered and wind-powered generating capacity, each of which is also a climate-dependent resource.


As a result, the overall financial results of each Registrant may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal and quarterly basis. Each Registrant has historically provided less service, and consequently earned less income, when weather conditions are mild. Unusually mild weather in the future may adversely affect each Registrant's consolidated financial results through lower revenue or margins. Conversely, unusually extreme weather conditions could increase each Registrant's costs to provide services and could adversely affect its consolidated financial results. The extent of fluctuation in each Registrant's consolidated financial results may change depending on a number of factors related to its regulatory environment and contractual agreements, including its ability to recover energy costs, the existence of revenue sharing provisions as it relates to MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, and terms of its wholesale sale contracts.


74


Each Registrant is subject to market risk associated with the wholesale energy markets, which could adversely affect its consolidated financial results.


In general, each Registrant's primary market risk is adverse fluctuations in the market price of wholesale electricity and fuel, including natural gas, coal and fuel oil, which is compounded by volumetric changes affecting the availability of or demand for electricity and fuel. The market price of wholesale electricity may be influenced by several factors, such as the adequacy or type of generating capacity, scheduled and unscheduled outages of generating facilities, prices and availability of fuel sources for generation, disruptions or constraints to transmission and distribution facilities, weather conditions, demand for electricity, economic growth and changes in technology. Volumetric changes are caused by fluctuations in generation or changes in customer needs that can be due to the weather, electricity and fuel prices, the economy, regulations or customer behavior. For example, the Utilities purchase electricity and fuel in the open market as part of their normal operating businesses. If market prices rise, especially in a time when larger than expected volumes must be purchased at market prices, the Utilities may incur significantly greater expenseexpenses than anticipated. Likewise, if electricity market prices decline in a period when the Utilities are a net seller of electricity in the wholesale market, the Utilities could earn less revenue. Although the Utilities have energy cost adjustment mechanisms,ECAMs, the risks associated with changes in market prices may not be fully mitigated due to customer sharing bands as it relates to PacifiCorp and other factors.


Potential terrorist activities and the impact of military or other actions, including sanctions, export controls and similar measures, could adversely affect each Registrant's consolidated financial results.


The ongoing threat of terrorism and the impact of military or other actions by nations or politically, ethnically or religiously motivated organizations regionally or globally may create increased political, economic, social and financial market instability, which could subject each Registrant's operations to increased risks. Additionally, the United StatesU.S. government has issued warnings that energy assets, specifically pipeline, nuclear generation, transmission and other electric utility infrastructure, are potential targets for terrorist attacks. Further, the potential or actual outbreak of war or other hostilities, such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and the resulting economic sanctions on Russia and the sale of Russian natural gas and petroleum, as well as the existing and potential further responses from Russia or other countries to such sanctions and military actions, could adversely affect global and regional economies and financial markets. For instance, the current ban on imports of Russian oil, liquefied natural gas and coal to the U.S. could contribute to increases in prices for such commodities in the U.S. and elsewhere which could adversely affect each Registrant's business. Further, each Registrant's business must be conducted in compliance with applicable economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations, including those administered and enforced by the U.S. Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the United Nations Security Council and other relevant governmental authorities in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom and European Union, which include sanctions that could potentially restrict or prohibit each Registrant's relationships with certain suppliers and customers. Political, economic, social or financial market instability or damage to or interference with the operating assets of the Registrants, customers or suppliers, or continued increases in the price of natural gas and other petroleum commodities may result in business interruptions, lost revenue, higher commodity prices,costs, disruption in fuel supplies, lower energy consumption and unstable markets, particularly with respect to electricity and natural gas, and increased security, repair or other costs, any of which may materially adversely affect each Registrant in ways that cannot be predicted at this time. Any of these risks could materially affect itsBHE's consolidated financial results. Furthermore, instability in the financial markets as a result of terrorism or war could also materially adversely affect each Registrant's ability to raise capital.



75


Certain Registrants are subject to the unique risks associated with nuclear generation.


The ownership and operation of nuclear power plants,generating facilities, such as MidAmerican Energy's 25% ownership interest in Quad Cities Station, involves certain risks. These risks include, among other items, mechanical or structural problems, inadequacy or lapses in maintenance protocols, the impairment of reactor operation and safety systems due to human error, the costs of storage, handling and disposal of nuclear materials, compliance with and changes in regulation of nuclear power plants,generating facilities, limitations on the amounts and types of insurance coverage commercially available, and uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear facilities at the end of their useful lives. Additionally, Exelon Generation,Constellation Energy, the 75% owner and operator of the facility, may respond to the occurrence of any of these or other risks in a manner that negatively impacts MidAmerican Energy, including closure of Quad Cities Station prior to the expiration of its operating license. The prolonged unavailability, or early closure, of Quad Cities Station due to operational or economic factors could have a materially adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's financial results, particularly when the cost to produce power at the plantgenerating facility is significantly less than market wholesale prices. The following are among the more significant of these risks:
Operational Risk - Operations at any nuclear power plantgenerating facility could degrade to the point where the plantgenerating facility would have to be shut down. If such degradations were to occur, the process of identifying and correcting the causes of the operational downgrade to return the plantgenerating facility to operation could require significant time and expense,expenses, resulting in both lost revenue and increased fuel and purchased electricity costs to meet supply commitments. Rather than incurring substantial costs to restart the plant,generating facility, the plantgenerating facility could be shut down. Furthermore, a shut-down or failure at any other nuclear power plantgenerating facility could cause regulators to require a shut-down or reduced availability at Quad Cities Station.
In addition, issues relating to the disposal of nuclear waste material, including the availability, unavailability and expenseexpenses of a permanent repository for spent nuclear fuel could adversely impact operations as well as the cost and ability to decommission nuclear power plants,generating facilities, including Quad Cities Station, in the future.


Regulatory Risk - The NRC may modify, suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply with applicable Atomic Energy Act regulations or the terms of the licenses of nuclear facilities. Unless extended, the NRC operating licenses for Quad Cities Station will expire in 2032. Changes in regulations by the NRC could require a substantial increase in capital expenditures or result in increased operating or decommissioning costs.

Nuclear Accident and Catastrophic Risks - Accidents and other unforeseen catastrophic events have occurred at nuclear facilities other than Quad Cities Station, both in the United StatesU.S. and elsewhere, such as at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plantgenerating facility in Japan as a result of the earthquake and tsunami in March 2011. The consequences of an accident or catastrophic event can be severe and include loss of life and property damage. Any resulting liability from a nuclear accident or catastrophic event could exceed the relevant Registrant's resources, including insurance coverage.


Certain of BHE's subsidiaries are subject to the risk that customers will not renew their contracts or that BHE's subsidiaries will be unable to obtain new customers for expanded capacity, each of which could adversely affect its consolidated financial results.


If BHE's subsidiaries are unable to renew, remarket, or find replacements for their customer agreements on favorable terms, BHE's subsidiaries' sales volumes and operating revenue would be exposed to reduction and increased volatility. For example, without the benefit of long-term transportation agreements, BHE cannot assure that the Pipeline Companies will be able to transport natural gas at efficient capacity levels. Substantially all of the Pipeline Companies' revenues arerevenue is generated under transportation, storage and storageLNG contracts that periodically must be renegotiated and extended or replaced, and the Pipeline Companies are dependent upon relatively few customers for a substantial portion of their revenue. Similarly, without long-term power purchase agreements, BHE cannot assure that its unregulated power generators will be able to operate profitably. Failure to maintain existing long-term agreements or secure new long-term agreements, or being required to discount rates significantly upon renewal or replacement, could adversely affect BHE's consolidated financial results. The replacement of any existing long-term agreements depends on market conditions and other factors that may be beyond BHE's subsidiaries' control.



76


Each Registrant is subject to counterparty risk, which could adversely affect its consolidated financial results.


Each Registrant is subject to counterparty credit risk related to contractual payment obligations with wholesale suppliers and customers. Adverse economic conditions or other events affecting counterparties with whom each Registrant conducts business could impair the ability of these counterparties to meet their payment obligations. Each Registrant depends on these counterparties to remit payments on a timely basis. Each Registrant continues to monitor the creditworthiness of its wholesale suppliers and customers in an attempt to reduce the impact of any potential counterparty default. If strategies used to minimize these risk exposures are ineffective or if any Registrant's wholesale suppliers' or customers' financial condition deteriorates or they otherwise become unable to pay, it could have a significant adverse impact on each Registrant's liquidity and its consolidated financial results.


Each Registrant is subject to counterparty performance risk related to performance of contractual obligations by wholesale suppliers, customers and contractors. Each Registrant relies on wholesale suppliers to deliver commodities, primarily natural gas, coal and electricity, in accordance with short- and long-term contracts. Failure or delay by suppliers to provide these commodities pursuant to existing contracts could disrupt the delivery of electricity and require the Utilities to incur additional expenses to meet customer needs. In addition, when these contracts terminate, the Utilities may be unable to purchase the commodities on terms equivalent to the terms of current contracts.


Each Registrant relies on wholesale customers to take delivery of the energy they have committed to purchase. Failure of customers to take delivery may require the relevant Registrant to find other customers to take the energy at lower prices than the original customers committed to pay. If each Registrant's wholesale customers are unable to fulfill their obligations, there may be a significant adverse impact on its consolidated financial results.


The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' customers are concentrated in a small number of electricity supply businesses with RWE Npower PLCE.ON and British Gas Trading Limited accounting for approximately 21%22% and 15%14%, respectively, of distribution revenue in 2017.2022. AltaLink's primary source of operating revenue is the AESO. Generally, a single customer purchases the energy from BHE's independent power projects in the United States and the PhilippinesU.S. pursuant to long-term power purchase agreements. For example, certain of BHE Renewables' solar and wind independent power projects sell all of their electrical production to either PG&E or SCE, respectively. Any material payment or other performance failure by the counterparties in these arrangements could have a significant adverse impact on BHE's consolidated financial results.


BHE owns investments and projects in foreign countries that are exposed to risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and increased economic, regulatory and political risks.


BHE's business operations and investments outside the United StatesU.S. increase its risk related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the British pound and the Canadian dollar. BHE's principal reporting currency is the United StatesU.S. dollar, and the value of the assets and liabilities, earnings, cash flows and potential distributions from its foreign operations changes with the fluctuations of the currency in which they transact. BHE indirectly owns a hydroelectric power plant in the Philippines and may acquire significant energy-related investments and projects outside of the United States. BHE may selectively reduce some foreign currency exchange rate risk by, among other things, requiring contracted amounts be settled in, or indexed to, United StatesU.S. dollars or a currency freely convertible into United StatesU.S. dollars, or hedging through foreign currency derivatives. These efforts, however, may not be effective and could negatively affect BHE's consolidated financial results.


In addition to any disruption in the global financial markets, the economic, regulatory and political conditions in some of the countries where BHE has operations or is pursuing investment opportunities may present increased risks related to, among others, inflation, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, currency repatriation restrictions, nationalization, renegotiation, privatization, availability of financing on suitable terms, customer creditworthiness, construction delays, business interruption, political instability, civil unrest, guerilla activity, terrorism, pandemics (including potentially in relation to COVID-19 variants), expropriation, trade sanctions, contract nullification and changes in law, regulations or tax policy. BHE may not choose to or be capable of either fully insuring against or effectively hedging these risks.



77


Poor performance of plan and fund investments and other factors impacting the pension and other postretirement benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning and mine reclamation trust funds could unfavorably impact each Registrant's cash flows, liquidity and liquidity.financial results.


Costs of providing each Registrant's defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans and costs associated with the joint trustee plan to which PacifiCorp contributes depend upon a number of factors, including the rates of return on plan assets, the level and nature of benefits provided, discount rates, mortality assumptions, the interest rates used to measure required minimum funding levels, the funded status of the plans, changes in benefit design, tax deductibility and funding limits, changes in laws and government regulation and each Registrant's required or voluntary contributions made to the plans. CertainFurthermore, the timing of recognition of unrecognized gains and losses associated with the Registrants' defined benefit pension plans is subject to volatility due to events that may give rise to settlement accounting. Settlement events resulting from lump sum distributions offered by certain of the Registrants' defined benefit pension plans are influenced by the interest rates used to discount a participant's lump sum distribution. When the applicable interest rates are low, lump sum distributions in a given year tend to increase resulting in a higher likelihood of triggering settlement accounting.

If the Registrant's pension and other postretirement benefit plans are in underfunded positions. Even if sustained growth inpositions, the investments over future periods increases the value of these plans' assets, eachrespective Registrant will likelymay be required to make cash contributions to fund thesesuch underfunded plans in the future. Additionally, each Registrant's plans have investments in domestic and foreign equity and debt securities and other investments that are subject to loss. Losses from investments could add to the volatility, size and timing of future contributions.


Furthermore, the funded status of the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan multiemployer plan to which PacifiCorp's subsidiary previously contributed is considered critical and declining. PacifiCorp's subsidiary involuntarily withdrew from the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan in June 2015 when the UMWA employees ceased performing work for the subsidiary. PacifiCorp has recorded its best estimate of the withdrawal obligation. If participating employers withdraw from a multiemployer plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers, including any employers that withdrew during the three years prior to a mass withdrawal.


In addition, MidAmerican Energy is required to fund over time the projected costs of decommissioning Quad Cities Station, a nuclear power plant,generating facility, and Bridger Coal Company, a joint venture of PacifiCorp's subsidiary, Pacific Minerals, Inc., is required to fund projected mine reclamation costs. FundsThe funds that MidAmerican Energy has invested in a nuclear decommissioning trust and a subsidiary of PacifiCorp has invested in a mine reclamation trust are invested in debt and equity securities and poor performance of these investments will reduce the amount of funds available for their intended purpose, which could require MidAmerican Energy or PacifiCorpPacifiCorp's subsidiary to make additional cash contributions. As contributions to the trust are being made over the operating life of the respective facility, reductions in the expected operating life of the facility could also require MidAmerican Energy and PacifiCorp's subsidiary to make additional contributions to the related trust. Such cash funding obligations, which are also impacted by the other factors described above, could have a material impact on MidAmerican Energy's or PacifiCorp's liquidity by reducing their available cash.


Inflation and changes in commodity prices and fuel transportation costs may adversely affect each Registrant's consolidated financial results.


Inflation and increases in commodity prices and fuel transportation costs may affect each Registrant by increasing both operating and capital costs. As a result of existing rate agreements, contractual arrangements or competitive price pressures, each Registrant may not be able to pass the costs of inflation on to its customers. If each Registrant is unable to manage cost increases or pass them on to its customers, its consolidated financial results could be adversely affected.


Cyclical fluctuations and competition in the residential real estate brokerage and mortgage businesses could adversely affect HomeServices.


The residential real estate brokerage and mortgage industries tend to experience cycles of greater and lesser activity and profitability and are typically affected by changes in economic conditions, which are beyond HomeServices' control. Any of the following, among others, are examples of items that could have a material adverse effect on HomeServices' businesses by causing a general decline in the number of home sales, sale prices or the number of home financings which, in turn, would adversely affect its financial results:
rising interest rates or unemployment rates, including a sustained high unemployment rate in the United States;U.S.;
periods of economic slowdown or recession in the markets served;served or the adverse effects on market actions as a result of epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks;
decreasing home affordability;
78


lack of available mortgage credit for potential homebuyers, such as the reduced availability of credit, which may continue into future periods;
inadequate home inventory levels;
nontraditional sources of new competition; and
changes in applicable tax law.



Disruptions in the financial markets could affect each Registrant's ability to obtain debt financing or to draw upon or renew existing credit facilities and have other adverse effects on each Registrant.


Disruptions in the financial markets could affect each Registrant's ability to obtain debt financing or to draw upon or renew existing credit facilities and have other adverse effects on each Registrant. Significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the United States,U.S., Great Britain, Canada and global credit markets, such as those that occurred in 2008, 2009 and 2009,2020, may materially impact liquidity in the bank and debt capital markets, making financing terms less attractive for borrowers that are able to find financing and, in other cases, may cause certain types of debt financing, or any financing, to be unavailable. Additionally, economic uncertainty in the United StatesU.S. or globally may adversely affect the United States'U.S. credit markets and could negatively impact each Registrant's ability to access funds on favorable terms or at all. If eacha Registrant is unable to access the bank and debt markets to meet liquidity and capital expenditure needs, it may adversely affect the timing and amount of its capital expenditures, acquisition financing and its consolidated financial results.

Potential changes in accounting standards may impact each Registrant's consolidated financial results and disclosures in the future, which may change the way analysts measure each Registrant's business or financial performance.

The Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") and the SEC continuously make changes to accounting standards and disclosure and other financial reporting requirements. New or revised accounting standards and requirements issued by the FASB or the SEC or new accounting orders issued by the FERC could significantly impact each Registrant's consolidated financial results and disclosures. For example, beginning in 2018 all changes in the fair values of equity securities (whether realized or unrealized) will be recognized as gains or losses in the relevant Registrant's consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, periodic changes in such Registrant's reported net income will likely be subject to significant variability.


Each Registrant is involved in a variety of legal proceedings, the outcomes of which are uncertain and could adversely affect its consolidated financial results.


Each Registrant is, and in the future may become, a party to a variety of legal proceedings. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the Registrants cannot predict the outcome of individual matters with certainty. It is possible that the final resolution of some of the matters in which each Registrant is involved could result in additional material payments substantially in excess of established reservesliabilities or in terms that could require each Registrant to change business practices and procedures or divest ownership of assets. Further, litigation could result in the imposition of financial penalties or injunctions and adverse regulatory consequences, any of which could limit each Registrant's ability to take certain desired actions or the denial of needed permits, licenses or regulatory authority to conduct its business, including the siting or permitting of facilities. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on such Registrant's consolidated financial results.


Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.



Item 2.Properties


Each Registrant's energy properties consist of the physical assets necessary to support its applicable electricity and natural gas businesses. Properties of the relevant Registrant's electricity businesses include electric generation, transmission and distribution facilities, as well as coal mining assets that support certain of PacifiCorp's electric generating facilities. Properties of the relevant Registrant's natural gas businesses include natural gas distribution facilities, interstate pipelines, storage facilities, LNG facilities, compressor stations and meter stations. The transmission and distribution assets are primarily within each Registrant's service territories. In addition to these physical assets, the Registrants have rights-of-way, mineral rights and water rights that enable each Registrant to utilize its facilities. It is the opinion of each Registrant's management that the principal depreciable properties owned by it are in good operating condition and are well maintained. Pursuant to separate financing agreements, substantially all of PacifiCorp's electric utility properties, MidAmerican Energy's electric utility properties in the state of Iowa, Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's properties in the state of Nevada, ALP'sAltaLink's transmission properties and substantially all of the assets of the subsidiaries of BHE Renewables that are direct or indirect owners of generation projects are pledged or encumbered to support or otherwise provide the security for the related subsidiary debt. For additional information regarding each Registrant's energy properties, refer to Item 1 of this Form 10-K and Notes 4, 5 and 2122 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 43 and 54 of the Notes to Financial Statements of MidAmerican Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Nevada Power in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Sierra Pacific in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Notes 4 and 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Eastern Energy Gas in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


79


The following table summarizes Berkshire Hathaway Energy's operating electric generating facilities that are in operation as of December 31, 2017:2022:
Facility NetNet Owned
EnergyCapacityCapacity
SourceEntityLocation by Significance(MWs)(MWs)
WindPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, BHE Canada, BHE Montana and BHE RenewablesIowa, Wyoming, Texas, Montana, Nebraska, Washington, California, Illinois, Canada, Oregon and Kansas12,282 12,282 
Natural gasPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, NV Energy, BHE Canada and BHE RenewablesNevada, Utah, Iowa, Illinois, Washington, Wyoming, Oregon, Texas, New York, Arizona and Canada11,284 11,005 
CoalPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and NV EnergyWyoming, Iowa, Utah, Nevada, Colorado and Montana13,210 8,178 
SolarMidAmerican Energy, NV Energy, Northern Powergrid and BHE RenewablesCalifornia, Australia, Texas, Arizona, Iowa, Minnesota and Nevada2,120 1,972 
HydroelectricPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and BHE RenewablesWashington, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Hawaii, Montana, Illinois, California and Wyoming985 985 
NuclearMidAmerican EnergyIllinois1,822 455 
GeothermalPacifiCorp and BHE RenewablesCalifornia and Utah377 377 
Total42,080 35,254 
      Facility Net Net Owned
Energy     Capacity Capacity
Source Entity Location by Significance (MW) (MW)
         
Natural gas PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, NV Energy and BHE Renewables Nevada, Utah, Iowa, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Texas, New York and Arizona 10,919 10,640
         
Coal PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and NV Energy Wyoming, Iowa, Utah, Arizona, Nevada, Colorado and Montana 16,232 9,158
         
Wind PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and BHE Renewables Iowa, Wyoming, Nebraska, Washington, California, Texas, Oregon, Illinois and Kansas 6,533 6,524
         
Solar BHE Renewables and NV Energy California, Texas, Arizona, Minnesota and Nevada 1,675 1,527
         
Hydroelectric 
PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy
 and BHE Renewables
 Washington, Oregon, The Philippines, Idaho, California, Utah, Hawaii, Montana, Illinois and Wyoming 1,299 1,277
         
Nuclear MidAmerican Energy Illinois 1,820 455
         
Geothermal PacifiCorp and BHE Renewables California and Utah 370 370
         
    Total 38,848 29,951


Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, the Company has electric generating facilities that are under construction in Iowa, IllinoisNevada and Minnesota as of December 31, 2017Wyoming having total Facility Net Capacity and Net Owned Capacity of 1,902 MW.243 MWs.



The right to construct and operate each Registrant's electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines across certain property was obtained in most circumstances through negotiations and, where necessary, through prescription, eminent domain or similar rights. PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific, BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas and Kern River in the United States;U.S.; Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limitedplc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc in Great Britain; and ALPAltaLink in Alberta, Canada continue to have the power of eminent domain or similar rights in each of the jurisdictions in which they operate their respective facilities, but the United StatesU.S. and Canadian utilities do not have the power of eminent domain with respect to governmental, Native American or Canadian First Nations' tribal lands. Although the main Kern River pipeline crosses the Moapa Indian Reservation, all facilities in the Moapa Indian Reservation are located within a utility corridor that is reserved to the United StatesU.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management.


With respect to real property, each of the electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines fall into two basic categories: (1) parcels that are owned in fee, such as certain of the electric generating facilities, electric substations, natural gas compressor stations, natural gas meter stations and office sites; and (2) parcels where the interest derives from leases, easements (including prescriptive easements), rights-of-way, permits or licenses from landowners or governmental authorities permitting the use of such land for the construction, operation and maintenance of the electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines. Each Registrant believes it has satisfactory title or interest to all of the real property making up their respective facilities in all material respects.


80


Item 3.Legal Proceedings


Each Registrant is partyBerkshire Hathaway Energy and PacifiCorp

On September 30, 2020, a putative class action complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885, Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by Oregon residents and businesses who seek to represent a varietyclass of legal actions arising outall Oregon citizens and entities whose real or personal property was harmed beginning on September 7, 2020, by wildfires in Oregon allegedly caused by PacifiCorp. On November 3, 2021, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to limit the class to include Oregon citizens allegedly impacted by the Echo Mountain Complex, South Obenchain, Two Four Two and Santiam Canyon fires, as well as to add claims for noneconomic damages. The amended complaint alleges that PacifiCorp's assets contributed to the Oregon wildfires occurring on or after September 7, 2020 and that PacifiCorp acted with gross negligence, among other things. The amended complaint seeks the following damages for the plaintiffs and the putative class: (i) noneconomic damages, including mental suffering, emotional distress, inconvenience and interference with normal and usual activities, in excess of $1 billion; (ii) damages for real and personal property and other economic losses of not less than $600 million; (iii) double the amount of property and economic damages; (iv) treble damages for specific costs associated with loss of timber, trees and shrubbery; (v) double the damages for the costs of litigation and reforestation; (vi) prejudgment interest; and (vii) reasonable attorney fees, investigation costs and expert witness fees. The plaintiffs demand a trial by jury and have reserved their right to further amend the complaint to allege claims for punitive damages. In May 2022, the Multnomah Circuit Court granted issue class certification and consolidated this case with others as described below. PacifiCorp requested an immediate appeal of the normal courseissue class certification before the Oregon Court of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seekAppeals. In January 2023, the Oregon Court of Appeals denied PacifiCorp's request for appeal. In February 2023, the plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint to add punitive damages in an unspecified amount.

On August 20, 2021, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Shylo Salter et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV33595, Multnomah County, Oregon, in which two complaints, Case No. 21CV09339 and Case No. 21CV09520, previously filed in Circuit Court, Marion County, Oregon, were combined. The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the previously filed complaints in Marion County, Oregon. The refiled complaint was filed by Oregon residents and businesses who allege that they were injured by the Beachie Creek fire, which the plaintiffs allege began on or exemplaryaround September 7, 2020, but which government reports indicate began on or around August 16, 2020. The complaint alleges that PacifiCorp's assets contributed to the Beachie Creek fire and that PacifiCorp acted with gross negligence, among other things. The complaint seeks the following damages: (i) damages related to real and personal property in an amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, estimated not to exceed $75 million; (ii) other economic losses in an amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, but not to exceed $75 million; (iii) noneconomic damages in the amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, but not to exceed $500 million; (iv) double the damages for economic and property damages under specified Oregon statutes; (v) alternatively, treble the damages under specified Oregon statutes; (vi) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre- and post-judgment interest. The plaintiffs demand a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint with an intent to add a claim for punitive damages. Each Registrant does not believe that such normalIn May 2022, this case was consolidated with others as described below.

In May 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court granted plaintiffs' motion to consolidate Shylo Salter et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV33595 (described above) and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. Each Registrant isAmy Allen, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 20CV37430 ("Allen") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). Plaintiffs' motion to bifurcate issues for trial between class-wide liability and individual damages was also involvedgranted. The Allen case was filed by five individuals as amended in other kindsSeptember 2021 claiming in excess of legal actions, some$32 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penaltiesdamages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- and post-judgment interest.

In June 2022, an amended complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Tim Goforth et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 20CV37637, Douglas County, Oregon, in substantial amounts.which a previously filed complaint associated with the Archie Creek, Susan Creek and Smith Springs Road fires in Douglas County in September 2020 was amended to add punitive damages. The complaint alleges (i) PacifiCorp's conduct not only constituted common law negligence but gross negligence and contributed to or was the cause of ignition and spread of the aforementioned fires; (ii) PacifiCorp violated certain Oregon rules and regulations; and (iii) as an alternative to negligence, inverse condemnation. The complaint seeks the following damages: (i) economic and property damages of $11 million under a determination of negligence or inverse condemnation and subject to doubling under Oregon statute if applicable; (ii) doubling of those economic and property damages to $22 million under a determination of gross negligence; (iii) damages for injuries in excess of $47 million; (iv) punitive damages not to exceed 10 times the amount of non-economic damages awarded; (v) all costs of the lawsuit; (vi) pre- and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and (vii) attorneys' fees and other costs. Pursuant to a settlement stipulation agreed to in November 2022, the Douglas County Circuit Court issued an order dismissing the case with prejudice and without costs, disbursements or attorney fees to any of the parties.


81
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures



On August 26, 2022, a putative class action complaint seeking declaratory and equitable relief against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Margaret Dietrich et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29187, Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by two Oregon residents individually and on behalf of a class initially defined to include residents of, business owners in, real or personal property owners in and any other individuals physically present in specified Oregon counties as of September 7, 2020 who experienced any harm, damage or loss as a result of the Santiam, Beachie Creek, Lionshead, Echo Mountain Complex, Two Four Two or South Obenchain fires in September 2020. The complaint was amended on September 6, 2022, to seek damages of over $900 million that were originally demanded on August 4, 2022, pursuant to Oregon Rule of Civil Procedure 32 H. The amended complaint alleges: (i) negligence due to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules; (ii) gross negligence due to alleged conscious indifference to or reckless disregard for the probable consequences of defendant's actions or inactions; (iii) private nuisance; (iv) public nuisance; (v) trespass; (vi) inverse condemnation; (vii) accounting/injunction; (viii) negligent infliction of emotional distress. The amended complaint seeks the following: (i) an order certifying the matter as a class action; (ii) economic damages not less than $400 million; (iii) double the amount of economic and property damages to the extent applicable under Oregon statute; (iv) reasonable costs of reforestation activities; (v) doubling and trebling of certain other damages to the extent applicable under certain Oregon statutes; (vi) noneconomic damages not less than $500 million; (vii) prejudgment interest; (viii) an order requiring an accounting with respect to the amount of damages; (ix) an order enjoining PacifiCorp from leaving power lines energized in areas of Oregon experiencing extremely critical fire conditions; (x) an award of reasonable attorney fees, costs, investigation costs, disbursements and expert witness fees; and (xi) other relief the court finds appropriate. The plaintiffs and proposed class demand a trial by jury. On December 19, 2022, the Dietrich case was consolidated into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above) and is currently stayed.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Martin Klinger et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29674, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Klinger"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Jeremiah E. Bowen et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29681, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Bowen"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned James Weathers et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29683, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Weathers"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 6, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Blair Barnholdt et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30097, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Barnholdt"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Estate of Nancy Darlene Hunter, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30214, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Hunter"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Willard K. Pratt et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30217, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Pratt"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned April Thompson et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30451, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Thompson"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.


82


The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Hunter, Pratt and Thompson cases are in the process of being consolidated with Sparkset al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV48022 ("Sparks")and Russieet al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV15840 ("Russie") into Ashley Andersen et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV36567 ("Andersen"). The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson complaints each allege: (i) negligence due in part to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules, including those issued by the OPUC; (ii) gross negligence alleged in the form of willful, wanton and reckless disregard of known risks to the public; (iii) trespass; (iv) nuisance; and (v) inverse condemnation. The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson complaints each seek the following damages: (i) economic and property related damages of $83 million; (ii) doubling of those economic and property related damages to $167 million to the extent eligible for doubling of damages under the specified Oregon statute; (iii) non-economic damages to the plaintiffs' persons in an amount not less than $83 million for physical injury, mental suffering, emotional distress and other damages; (iv) loss of wages, loss of earnings capacity, evacuation expenses, displacement expenses and similar damages; (v) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre-judgment interest. The plaintiffs for each Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson request a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. The Hunter complaint seeks $50 million in damages and alleges claims for: (i) negligence, (ii) trespass, (iii), nuisance, (iv) inverse condemnation, and (v) wrongful death. The Andersen case was filed by 50 individuals as amended in August 2022 seeking $250 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest. The Sparks case was filed by 17 individuals in December 2021 claiming $125 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- judgment interest. The Russie case was filed by 45 individuals as amended in September 2022 seeking $250 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Aaron Macy-Wyngarden et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29684, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Macy-Wyngarden"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Beachie Creek, Santiam Canyon, Lionshead and Riverside fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 22, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Zachary Bogle et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29717, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Bogle"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Beachie Creek, Santiam Canyon, Lionshead and Riverside fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

The Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle complaints each allege: (i) negligence due in part to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules, including those issued by the OPUC; (ii) gross negligence alleged in the form of willful, wanton and reckless disregard of known risks to the public; (iii) trespass; (iv) nuisance; and (v) inverse condemnation. The Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle complaints each seek the following damages: (i) economic and property related damages of $83 million; (ii) doubling of those economic and property related damages to $167 million to the extent eligible for doubling of damages under the specified Oregon statute; (iii) non-economic damages to the plaintiffs' persons in an amount not less than $83 million for physical injury, mental suffering, emotional distress and other damages; (iv) loss of wages, loss of earnings capacity, evacuation expenses, displacement expenses and similar damages; (v) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre-judgment interest. The plaintiffs for each Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle request a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages.

On September 2, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Logan et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29859, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Logan"). The Logan complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The Logan case is in the process of being consolidated with Cady et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV13946 ("Cady") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Logan and Cady complaints each allege: (i) negligence; (ii) trespass; (iii) nuisance, and (iv) inverse condemnation. The Logan case was filed by five individuals claiming $10 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- and post-judgment interest. The Cady case was filed by 21 individuals as amended in April 2022 claiming $10 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest.

83


On October 14, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV26326 ("21st Century") and Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29976 into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The 21st Century and Allstate complaints were each filed by subrogated insurance carriers alleging claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, and (iii) inverse condemnation resulting from the September 2020 Santiam Canyon, Echo Mountain Complex, 242, and South Obenchain fires. The 21st Century case was filed in August 2022 by 177 insurance carriers seeking $20 million in damages. The Allstate case was filed in September 2022 by 11 insurance carriers seeking $40 million in damages.

On October 17, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated Michael Bell, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30450 ("Bell") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Bell case was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon on September 7, 2022, by 59 plaintiffs seeking $35 million in damages for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) trespass, (iii) nuisance, and (iv) inverse condemnation.

On October 19, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated Freres Timber, Inc. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29694 ("Freres") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Freres case was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon on September 1, 2022, by one plaintiff and seeks $40m for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, and (iii) inverse condemnation.

On December 6, 2022, CW Specialty Lumber, Inc., et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV41640 ("CW Specialty") was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon by two plaintiffs seeking $28.6 million in damages for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, (iii) trespass, and (iv) inverse condemnation. The CW Specialty case is in the process of being consolidated into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above).

Other individual lawsuits alleging similar claims have been filed in Oregon and California related to the 2020 Wildfires, including multiple complaints filed in California for the September 2020 Slater Fire. Multiple complaints have also been filed in California for the 2022 McKinney fire. The complaints filed in California do not specify damages sought. Investigations into the causes and origins of those wildfires are ongoing. For more information regarding certain legal proceedings affecting Berkshire Hathaway Energy, refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and PacifiCorp, refer to Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

PacifiCorp

On March 17, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Roseburg Resources Co et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV09346, Circuit Court, Douglas County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by nine businesses and public pension plans that own and/or operate timberlands or possess property in Douglas County who allege damages, losses and injuries associated with their timberlands as a result of the French Creek, Archie Creek, Susan Creek and Smith Springs Road fires in Douglas County in September 2020. The complaint alleges (i) PacifiCorp's conduct constituted not only common law negligence but also gross negligence and that such conduct contributed to or caused the ignition and spread of the aforementioned fires; (ii) PacifiCorp violated certain Oregon rules and regulations; and (iii) as an alternative to negligence, inverse condemnation. The complaint seeks the following damages as amended: (i) economic and property damages in excess of $195 million under a determination of negligence or inverse condemnation; (ii) doubling of those economic damages to in excess of $390 million under a determination of gross negligence pursuant to Oregon statutes; (iii) all costs of the lawsuit; (iv) prejudgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and (v) attorneys' fees and other costs.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Information regarding Berkshire Hathaway Energy's and PacifiCorp's mine safety violations and other legal matters disclosed in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K.



84


PART II


Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY


BHE's common stock is beneficially owned by Berkshire Hathaway Mr. Walter Scott, Jr., a member of BHE's Board of Directors (along with hisand family members and related or affiliated entities) andentities of the late Mr. Gregory E. Abel,Walter Scott, Jr., a former member of BHE's Executive Chairman,Board of Directors, and has not been registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, listed on a stock exchange or otherwise publicly held or traded. BHE has not declared or paid any cash dividends to its common shareholders since Berkshire Hathaway acquired an equity ownership interest in BHE in March 2000 and does not presently anticipate that it will declare any dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.

For a discussion of restrictions that limit BHE's and its subsidiaries' ability to pay dividends on their common stock, refer to Note 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


PACIFICORP


All common stock of PacifiCorp is held by its parent company, PPW Holdings LLC, which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. PacifiCorp declared and paid dividends to PPW Holdings LLC of $600$300 million in 2017 and $8752023, $100 million in 2016.2022 and $150 million in 2021.


For a discussion of regulatory restrictions that limit PacifiCorp's ability to pay dividends on common stock, refer to "Limitations" in PacifiCorp's Item 7 in this Form 10-K and to Note 15 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

MIDAMERICAN FUNDING AND MIDAMERICAN ENERGY


All common stock of MidAmerican Energy is held by its parent company, MHC, which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of MidAmerican Funding. MidAmerican Funding is an Iowa limited liability company whose membership interest is held solely by BHE. Neither MidAmerican Funding ordeclared and paid cash distributions to BHE of $100 million in 2023, $69 million in 2022 and $— million in 2021. MidAmerican Energy declared orand paid any cash distributions or dividends to its sole member or shareholderMHC totaling $100 million in 20172023, $275 million in 2022 and 2016.$— million in 2021.


For a discussion of regulatory restrictions that limit MidAmerican Energy's ability to pay dividends on common stock, refer to "Debt Authorizations and Related Matters" in MidAmerican Energy's Item 7 in this Form 10-K and to Note 9 of the Notes to Financial Statements of MidAmerican Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

NEVADA POWER


All common stock of Nevada Power is held by its parent company, NV Energy, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Nevada Power declared and paid dividends to NV Energy of $548$— million in 20172022 and $469$213 million in 2016.2021.


SIERRA PACIFIC


All common stock of Sierra Pacific is held by its parent company, NV Energy, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Sierra Pacific declared and paid dividends to NV Energy of $45$70 million in 20172022 and $51$— million in 2016.2021.



EASTERN ENERGY GAS

Eastern Energy Gas is a Virginia limited liability corporation whose membership interest is held solely by its parent company, BHE GT&S, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Eastern Energy Gas declared and paid dividends to BHE GT&S of $— million in 2022 and 2021.

EGTS

All common stock of EGTS is held by its parent company, Eastern Energy Gas, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. EGTS declared and paid dividends to Eastern Energy Gas of $215 million in 2022 and $18 million in 2021.
85


Item 6.[Reserved]

Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 6.Selected Financial Data
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy Company
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries


Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy Company
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries


86


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MidAmerican Energy Company
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Balance Sheets
Statements of Operations
Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Financial Statements
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy Company
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Member's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
PacifiCorpEastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MidAmerican Energy CompanyEastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Statements of Operations
Statements of Comprehensive Income
Statements of Changes in Equity
Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Financial Statements
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

87



Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section

88
Item 6.Selected Financial Data

Information required by


Item 6 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(a) to Form 10-K.7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 6 of this Form 10-K and with the Company's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.


The reportable segment financial information includes all necessary adjustments and eliminations needed to conform to the Company's significant accounting policies. The differences between the reportable segment amounts and the consolidated amounts, described as BHE and Other, relate principally to other entities, including MES, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.


Results of Operations


Overview


Net incomeOperating revenue and earnings on common shares for the Company's reportable segments for the years ended December 31 isare summarized as follows (in millions):

20222021Change20212020Change
Operating revenue:Operating revenue:
PacifiCorpPacifiCorp$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
MidAmerican FundingMidAmerican Funding4,025 3,547 478 13 3,547 2,728 819 30 
NV EnergyNV Energy3,824 3,107 717 23 3,107 2,854 253 
Northern PowergridNorthern Powergrid1,365 1,188 177 15 1,188 1,022 166 16 
BHE Pipeline GroupBHE Pipeline Group3,844 3,544 300 3,544 1,578 1,966 *
BHE TransmissionBHE Transmission732 731 — 731 659 72 11 
BHE RenewablesBHE Renewables994 981 13 981 936 45 
HomeServicesHomeServices5,268 6,215 (947)(15)6,215 5,396 819 15 
BHE and OtherBHE and Other606 541 65 12 541 438 103 24 
Total operating revenueTotal operating revenue$26,337 $25,150 $1,187 %$25,150 $20,952 $4,198 20 %
2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders:               
Earnings on common shares:Earnings on common shares:
PacifiCorp$769
 $764
 $5
 1 % $764
 $697
 $67
 10 %PacifiCorp$921 $889 $32 %$889 $741 $148 20 %
MidAmerican Funding574
 532
 42
 8
 532
 442
 90
 20
MidAmerican Funding947 883 64 883 818 65 
NV Energy346
 359
 (13) (4) 359
 379
 (20) (5)NV Energy427 439 (12)(3)439 410 29 
Northern Powergrid251
 342
 (91) (27) 342
 422
 (80) (19)Northern Powergrid385 247 138 56 247 201 46 23 
BHE Pipeline Group277
 249
 28
 11
 249
 243
 6
 2
BHE Pipeline Group1,040 807 233 29 807 528 279 53 
BHE Transmission224
 214
 10
 5
 214
 186
 28
 15BHE Transmission247 247 — — 247 231 16 
BHE Renewables(1)
864
 179
 685
 *
 179
 124
 55
 44
BHE Renewables(1)
625 451 174 39 451 521 (70)(13)
HomeServices149
 127
 22
 17
 127
 104
 23
 22
HomeServices100 387 (287)(74)387 375 12 
BHE and Other(584) (224) (360) *
 (224) (227) 3
 1
BHE and Other(2,017)1,319 (3,336)*1,319 3,092 (1,773)(57)
Total net income attributable to BHE shareholders$2,870
 $2,542
 $328
 13
 $2,542
 $2,370
 $172
 7
Total earnings on common sharesTotal earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $(2,994)(53)%$5,669 $6,917 $(1,248)(18)%


(1)Includes the tax attributes of disregarded entities that are not required to pay income taxes and the earnings of which are taxable directly to BHE.

*    Not meaningfulmeaningful.

(1)Includes the tax attributes of disregarded entities that are not required to pay income taxes and the earnings of which are taxable directly to BHE.


Net income attributable to BHE shareholders increased $328Earnings on common shares decreased $2,994 million for 20172022 compared to 2016, including2021. Included in these results was a $516pre-tax loss in 2022 of $1,950 million benefit as($1,540 million after-tax) compared to a resultpre-tax gain in 2021 of 2017 Tax Reform, partially offset by a charge of $263$1,796 million from tender offers for certain long-term debt completed($1,777 million after-tax) related to the Company's investment in December 2017.BYD Company Limited. Excluding the impactsimpact of these items,this item, adjusted net income attributable to BHE shareholdersearnings on common shares in 2022 was $2,617$4,215 million, an increase of $75$323 million, or 8%, compared to 2016.adjusted earnings on common shares in 2021 of $3,892 million.

89




The increasedecrease in net income attributable to BHE shareholders was due to the following with such explanations excluding the impacts of DSM and energy efficiency programs having no impact on net income:

PacifiCorp's net income increased $5 million, including $6 million of income from 2017 Tax Reform. Excluding the impact of 2017 Tax Reform, adjusted net income was $763 million, a decrease of $1 millionfor 2022 compared to 2016,2021 was primarily due toto:
The Utilities' earnings increased $84 million reflecting higher depreciationelectric utility margin and amortizationfavorable income tax expense, primarily from higher PTCs recognized of $26 million from additional plant placed in-service, lower AFUDC of $11 million, lower production tax credits of $11 million and higher property and other taxes of $7$157 million, partially offset by higher gross margins of $72 million. Gross marginsoperations and maintenance expense and higher depreciation and amortization expense. Electric retail customer volumes increased 2.4% for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher retail customer volumes, lower natural gas-fueled generation, higher wholesale revenue and higher wheeling revenue, partially offset by higher purchased electricity costs, lower average retail rates and higher coal costs. Retail customer volumes increased 1.7% due to favorable impacts of weather across the service territory, higher commercial usage, and an increase in the average number of residentialcustomers and commercial customers primarily in Utah and Oregon, partially offset by lower residential usage in Utah and Oregon and lower irrigation usage.the favorable impact of weather;
MidAmerican Funding's net incomeNorthern Powergrid's earnings increased $42 million, including after-tax charges of $17 million related to the tender offer of a portion of MidAmerican Funding's 6.927% Senior Bonds due 2029 and $10$138 million for 2017 Tax Reform. Excluding the impacts of these items, adjusted net income was $601 million, an increase of $69 million2022 compared to 2016,2021, primarily due to a higher income tax benefit from higher production tax credits of $38 million, the effects of ratemaking and lower pre-tax income, and higher electric gross margins of $76 million, partially offset by higher maintenance expense of $52 million due to additional wind-powered generating facilities and the timing of fossil-fueled generation maintenance, higher depreciation and amortization of $21 million due to wind-powered generation and other plant placed in-service and accruals for Iowa regulatory arrangements, partially offset by a December 2016 reduction in depreciation rates, and higher property and other taxes of $7 million. Electric gross margins increased due to higher recoveries through bill riders, higher retail customer volumes, higher wholesale revenue and higher transmission revenue, partially offset by higher coal and purchased power costs. Retail customer volumes increased 2.4% due to industrial growth net of lower residential and commercial volumes from milder temperatures.
NV Energy's net income decreased $13 million, including a charge of $19 million from 2017 Tax Reform. Excluding the impact of 2017 Tax Reform, adjusted net income was $365 million, an increase of $6 million compared to 2016, primarily due to higher electric gross margins of $20 million and lower interest expense of $17 million from lower deferred charges and lower rates on outstanding debt balances, partially offset by $28 million of charges related to the Nevada Power regulatory rate order. Electric gross margins increased due to higher retail customer volumes, partially offset by a decrease in wholesale revenues. Retail customer volumes increased 1.5% due to customer usage patterns, higher customer demand from the impacts of weather and an increase in the average number of customers.
Northern Powergrid's net income decreased $91 million due to higher income tax expense of $35 million primarily due to $39 million of benefits from the resolution of income tax return claims in 2016 and $17 million of deferred income tax benefits reflected in 2016 duecharge of $109 million related to a 1% reductionJune 2021 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate higher pension expense of $24from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023 and favorable earnings from new gas and solar projects, partially offset by $41 million includingfrom the impact of settlement losses recognized in 2017stronger U.S. dollar;
BHE Pipeline Group's earnings increased $233 million due to higher lump sum payments,earnings at BHE GT&S from the impacts of the EGTS general rate case, favorable income tax adjustments, lower distribution revenue of $23operations and maintenance expense and higher margin from non-regulated activities;
BHE Renewables' earnings increased $174 million, and the stronger United States dollar of $11 million. These decreases were partially offset by $19 million of asset provisions recognized in 2016 at the CE Gas business. Distribution revenue decreasedprimarily due to higher operating revenue from owned renewable energy projects and higher earnings from tax equity investments, mainly due to the unfavorable impacts from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event;
HomeServices' earnings decreased $287 million, reflecting lower earnings from brokerage and settlement services largely attributable to a decrease in closed units distributed,at existing companies and lower earnings from mortgage services mainly from a decrease in funded volumes; and
BHE and Other's earnings decreased $3,336 million, primarily due to the recovery$3,317 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in 2016BYD Company Limited.
Earnings on common shares decreased $1,248 million for 2021 compared to 2020. Included in these results was a pre-tax gain in 2021 of $1,796 million ($1,777 million after-tax) compared to a pre-tax gain in 2020 of $4,774 million ($3,470 million after-tax) related to the December 2013 customer rebate and unfavorable movementsCompany's investment in regulatory provisions, partially offset by higher tariff rates.
BHE Pipeline Group's net income increased $28 million, including $7 million of income from 2017 Tax Reform.BYD Company Limited. Excluding the impact of 2017 Tax Reform,this item, adjusted net incomeearnings on common shares in 2021 was $270$3,892 million, an increase of $21$445 million, or 13%, compared to 2016, primarily due to a reductionadjusted earnings on common shares in expenses and regulatory liabilities related to the impact2020 of an alternative rate structure approved by the FERC at Kern River and higher transportation and storage revenues at Northern Natural Gas, partially offset by lower transportation revenue at Kern River and higher operating expense at Northern Natural Gas.$3,447 million.
BHE Transmission's
The decrease in net income increased $10 million from higher earnings at AltaLink of $18 million, partially offset by lower earnings at BHE U.S. Transmission of $8 million. Earnings at AltaLink increased primarily due to additional assets placed in-service, lower impairments of nonregulated natural gas-fueled generation assets of $21 million and the weaker United States dollar of $3 million, partially offset by more favorable regulatory decisions in 2016. BHE U.S. Transmission's earnings decreased primarily due to lower equity earnings at Electric Transmission Texas, LLC from the impacts of a regulatory rate order in March 2017.
BHE Renewables' net income increased $685 million, including $628 million of income from 2017 Tax Reform primarily resulting from reductions in deferred income tax liabilities. Excluding the impact of 2017 Tax Reform, adjusted net income was $236 million, an increase of $57 million compared to 2016, primarily due to additional wind and solar capacity placed in-service, higher generation at the Solar Star projects due to transformer related forced outages in 2016 and higher production at the Casecnan project due to higher rainfall.

HomeServices' net income increased $22 million, including $31 million of income from 2017 Tax Reform. Excluding the impact of 2017 Tax Reform, adjusted net income was $118 million, a decrease of $9 million compared to 2016, primarily due to lower earnings at acquired and existing brokerage businesses, partially offset by higher earnings at existing franchise businesses.
BHE and Other net loss increased $360 million, including after-tax charges of $246 million related to the tender offer of a portion of BHE's senior bonds and $127 million for 2017 Tax Reform. Excluding the impacts of these items, the adjusted net loss was $211 million, an improvement of $13 million compared to 2016. The $127 million of net loss from 2017 Tax Reform included an accrual for the deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits totaling $419 million, partially offset by $292 million of benefits from reductions in deferred income tax liabilities primarily related to the unrealized gain on the investment in BYD Company Limited.
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders increased $172 million for 20162021 compared to 20152020 was primarily due toto:
The Utilities' earnings increased $242 million reflecting higher electric utility margin, favorable income tax expense, from higher PTCs recognized of $139 million and the following:
PacifiCorp's net income increased $67 million due to higher gross marginsimpacts of $86 million,ratemaking, and lower operations and maintenance expenses of $18 million, and higher production tax credits of $8 million,expense, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization of $13 million, lower AFUDC of $9 million and higher property taxes of $5 million. Gross marginsexpense. Electric retail customer volumes increased 3.8% for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower purchased electricity costs, higher retail rates, lower coal-fueled generation and lower natural gas costs, partially offset by lower wholesale electricity revenue from lower volumes and prices. Retail customer volumes decreased by 0.6% due to lower commercial customer usage, in Utah and lower industrial customer usage primarily in Utah and Oregon, partially offset by an increase in the average number of residential customers in Utah and Oregon and commercial customers in Utah and the impactsfavorable impact of weather on residential customer volumes.weather;
MidAmerican Funding's net incomeNorthern Powergrid's earnings increased $90$46 million, primarily due to higher electric gross marginsdistribution performance, lower write-offs of $172gas exploration costs and $16 million higher production tax credits of $39 million and lower fossil-fueled generation operations and maintenance of $35 million,from the weaker U.S. dollar, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortizationthe comparative unfavorable impact of $72 million from wind-powered generation and other plant placed in-service and an accrual related to an Iowa regulatory revenue sharing arrangement, a pre-tax gain of $13 million in 2015 on the sale of a generating facility lease, higher interest expense of $12 million and higher income taxes from the effects of ratemaking and higher pre-tax income. Electric gross margins reflect higher retail sales volumes, higher retail rates in Iowa, lower energy costs, higher wholesale revenue and higher transmission revenue.
NV Energy's net income decreased $20 million due to higher operating expense of $27 million, higher depreciation and amortization of $11 million due to higher plant in-service and lower electric gross margins of $2 million, partially offset by lower interest expense of $12 million. Operating expense increased due to benefits from changes in contingent liabilities in 2015 and regulatory disallowances in 2016. Electric gross margins decreased primarily due to lower transmission and wholesale revenue and lower customer usage offset by higher customer growth.
Northern Powergrid's net income decreased $80 million due to the stronger United States dollar of $47 million, lower distribution revenues mainly due to the recovery in 2015 of the December 2013 customer rebate and unfavorable movements in regulatory provisions, higher depreciation of $25 million from additional assets placed in service, higher write-offs of hydrocarbon well exploration costs of $15 million and higher interest expense of $7 million. These adverse variances were partially offset by higher smart meter revenue, lower operating expenses and lower income tax expense primarily due to the resolution of income tax return claims from prior years partially offset by decreased deferred income tax benefits duecharges ($109 million in second quarter 2021 and $35 million in third quarter 2020) related to a 1% reductionenacted increases in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate in 2016 compared to a 2% reduction in 2015.rate;
BHE Pipeline Group's net incomeearnings increased $6$279 million, primarily due to $244 million of incremental earnings at BHE GT&S;
BHE Renewables' earnings decreased $70 million, primarily due to lower tax equity investment earnings from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, partially offset by earnings from tax equity investment projects reaching commercial operation and higher storage revenues, lower operating expensesperformance from owned renewable energy projects; and lower interest expense
BHE and Other's earnings decreased $1,773 million, primarily due to the early redemption$1,693 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in December 2015BYD Company Limited and $95 million of the 6.667% Senior Notes at Kern River,higher dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued in October 2020, partially offset by lower transportation revenues and higher depreciation expense.
BHE Transmission's net income increased $28 million from higher earnings at AltaLink of $22 million and at BHE U.S. Transmission of $6 million. Earnings at AltaLink increased primarily due to additional assets placed in-service and favorable regulatory decisions, partially offset by a $26 million pre-tax impairment related to nonregulated natural gas-fueled generation assets and the stronger United States dollar of $5 million. BHE U.S. Transmission's earnings improved primarily from higher equity earnings at Electric Transmission Texas, LLC from continued investment and additional plant placed in-service.
BHE Renewables' net income increased $55 million due to three tax equity investments reaching commercial operations in 2016 and higher production at wind projects, including additional capacity placed in-service in 2016 at two projects, partially offset by lower solar revenues mainly due to forced outages and higher depreciation expense due to additional wind and solar capacity placed in-service.

HomeServices' net income increased $23 million due to a 9% increase in closed brokerage units, primarily due to acquired brokerage businesses, a 2% increase in average home sales prices and higher earnings at existing mortgage and franchise businesses.
BHE and Other net loss improved $3 million due to lower interest expense, an increase incomparative consolidated deferred state income tax benefits and higher investment returns, partially offset by higher United States income taxes on foreign earnings.benefits.


90


Reportable Segment Results

Operating revenue and operating income for the Company's reportable segments for the years ended December 31 are summarized as follows (in millions):
 2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
Operating revenue:               
PacifiCorp$5,237
 $5,201
 $36
 1 % $5,201
 $5,232
 $(31) (1)%
MidAmerican Funding2,846
 2,631
 215
 8
 2,631
 2,515
 116
 5
NV Energy3,015
 2,895
 120
 4
 2,895
 3,351
 (456) (14)
Northern Powergrid949
 995
 (46) (5) 995
 1,140
 (145) (13)
BHE Pipeline Group993
 978
 15
 2
 978
 1,016
 (38) (4)
BHE Transmission699
 502
 197
 39
 502
 592
 (90) (15)
BHE Renewables838
 743
 95
 13
 743
 728
 15
 2
HomeServices3,443
 2,801
 642
 23
 2,801
 2,526
 275
 11
BHE and Other594
 676
 (82) (12) 676
 780
 (104) (13)
Total operating revenue$18,614
 $17,422
 $1,192
 7
 $17,422
 $17,880
 $(458) (3)
                
Operating income:               
PacifiCorp$1,462
 $1,427
 $35
 2 % $1,427
 $1,344
 $83
 6 %
MidAmerican Funding562
 566
 (4) (1) 566
 451
 115
 25
NV Energy765
 770
 (5) (1) 770
 812
 (42) (5)
Northern Powergrid436
 494
 (58) (12) 494
 593
 (99) (17)
BHE Pipeline Group475
 455
 20
 4
 455
 464
 (9) (2)
BHE Transmission322
 92
 230
 * 92
 260
 (168) (65)
BHE Renewables316
 256
 60
 23
 256
 255
 1
 
HomeServices214
 212
 2
 1
 212
 184
 28
 15
BHE and Other(38) (21) (17) (81) (21) (35) 14
 40
Total operating income$4,514
 $4,251
 $263
 6
 $4,251
 $4,328
 $(77) (2)

* Not meaningful


PacifiCorp


Operating revenue increased $36$383 million for 20172022 compared to 20162021, primarily due to higher retail revenue of $263 million and higher wholesale and other revenue of $50$120 million, partially offset by lower retail revenue of $14 million. Wholesale and otherlargely from higher average wholesale prices. Retail revenue increased primarily due to price impacts of $166 million from higher wholesale sales volumes and short-term market prices and higher wheeling revenue. Retail revenue decreasedaverage retail rates largely due to lower average rates of $64product mix and tariff changes and $97 million and lower DSM program revenue (offset in operating expense) of $55 million, primarily driven by the establishment of the Utah Sustainable Transportation and Energy Plan program, partially offset byfrom higher customer volumes of $105 million.retail volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.7%1.6%, primarily due to impactsthe favorable impact of weather across the service territory, higher commercial usage and an increase in the average number of residential and commercial customers, primarily in Utah and Oregon, partially offset by lower residential usagecustomer usage.

Earnings increased $32 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher utility margin of $235 million and higher allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction of $28 million, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance expense of $196 million, higher depreciation and amortization expense of $32 million, mainly from additional assets placed in-service, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and an unfavorable income tax benefit. Utility margin increased primarily due to favorable deferred net power costs, higher retail rates and volumes and higher average wholesale prices, partially offset by higher purchased power and thermal generation costs. Operations and maintenance expense increased mainly due to an increase in loss accruals and other costs associated with the September 2020 wildfires, net of estimated insurance recoveries, and higher general and plant maintenance costs. The unfavorable income tax benefit was largely due to state income tax impacts, partially offset by higher PTCs recognized of $21 million.

Operating revenue decreased $45 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower retail revenue of $98 million, partially offset by higher wholesale and other revenue of $53 million. Retail revenue decreased mainly due to $234 million from the Utah and Oregon general rate case orders issued in 2020 (fully offset in expense, primarily depreciation) and price impacts of $41 million from lower irrigation usage.

Operating incomerates primarily due to certain general rate case orders, partially offset by higher customer volumes of $177 million. Retail customer volumes increased $35 million for 2017 compared to 20163.1%, primarily due to higher gross marginscustomer usage, an increase in the average number of $72 million, excludingcustomers and the favorable impact of a decreaseweather. Wholesale and other revenue increased mainly due to higher wheeling revenue, average wholesale prices and REC sales, partially offset by $34 million from the Oregon RAC settlement (fully offset in DSM program revenue (offsetdepreciation expense) recognized in operating expense)2020.

Earnings increased $148 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to favorable income tax expense from higher PTCs recognized of $55$75 million from new wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service, and the impacts of ratemaking, lower operations and maintenance expense of $178 million and higher utility margin of $145 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $26$255 million fromand lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction of $72 million. Operations and maintenance expense decreased primarily due to lower costs associated with wildfires and the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement and lower thermal plant maintenance expense, partially offset by higher costs associated with additional plantwind-powered generating facilities placed in-service andas well as higher property and other taxes of $7 million. Gross marginsdistribution maintenance costs. Utility margin increased primarily due to the higher retail customer volumes, lower natural gas-fueled generation, higher wheeling and wholesale revenue and higher wheeling revenue,deferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms, partially offset by higher purchased electricitypower and thermal generation costs, the price impacts from lower average retail rates and higher coal costs.

Operating revenue decreased $31 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to lower wholesale and other revenue of $88 million, partially offset by higher retail revenue of $57 million. Wholesale and other revenue decreased due to lower wholesale volumes of $65 million and lower average wholesale prices of $25 million.wheeling expenses. The increase in retail revenuedepreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to higher retail rates. Retail customer volumes decreased by 0.6% due to lower commercial customer usage in Utah and lower industrial customer usage primarily in Utah and Oregon, partially offset by an increase in the average number of residential customers in Utah and Oregon and commercial customers in Utah and the impacts of weather on residential customer volumes.a depreciation study effective January 1, 2021, as well as additional assets placed in-service.


Operating income increased $83 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to higher margins of $86 million and lower operations and maintenance expenses of $18 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization of $13 million and higher property taxes of $5 million. Margins increased due to lower energy costs of $117 million, partially offset by lower operating revenue of $31 million. Energy costs decreased primarily due to lower purchased electricity costs, lower coal-fueled generation and lower natural gas costs, partially offset by higher gas-fueled generation and higher coal costs. Operations and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to lower plant maintenance costs associated with reduced generation and lower labor and benefit costs due to lower headcount, partially offset by a Washington rate case decision disallowing returns on recent selective catalytic reduction projects.

MidAmerican Funding


Operating revenue increased $215$478 million for 20172022 compared to 20162021, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $123$459 million and higher natural gas operating revenue of $82 million and higher other revenue of $9$27 million. Electric operating revenue increased due to higher retail revenue of $88 million and higher wholesale and other revenue of $35 million. Electric$261 million and higher retail revenue increased $73 million from higher recoveries through bill riders (substantially offset in cost of sales, operating expense and income tax expense) and $39 million from usage and growth and rate factors, including higher industrial sales volumes, partially offset by $24 million from the impact of milder temperatures in 2017. Electric retail customer volumes increased 2.4% from industrial growth, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of temperatures.$198 million. Electric wholesale and other revenue increased mainly due to higher average wholesale per-unit prices of $229 million and higher wholesale volumes of $36 million. Electric retail revenue increased primarily due to higher transmissionrecoveries through adjustment clauses of $134 million (fully offset in expense, primarily cost of sales) and higher customer volumes of $62 million. Electric retail customer volumes increased 4.3%, primarily due to higher customer usage and the favorable impact of weather. Natural gas operating revenue increased due to higher customer usage of $9 million, the favorable impact of weather of $9 million and the impacts of tax reform of $5 million.

91


Earnings increased $64 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric utility margin of $319 million, a favorable income tax benefit and higher natural gas utility margin of $25 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $254 million, higher operations and maintenance expense of $53 million, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and higher non-service benefit plan costs of $17 million. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to higher wholesale and retail revenues, partially offset by higher purchased power and thermal generation costs. The favorable income tax benefit was mainly due to higher PTCs recognized of $136 million, partially offset by state income tax impacts. Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily from the impacts of certain regulatory mechanisms and additional assets placed in-service. Operations and maintenance expense increased due to higher general and plant maintenance costs.

Operating revenue increased $819 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher natural gas operating revenue of $13 million, higher wholesale volumes of $12$430 million and higher wholesale priceselectric operating revenue of $8$390 million. Natural gas operating revenue increased due to a higher average per-unit cost of natural gas sold resulting in higher purchased gas adjustment recoveries of $67$440 million (offset(fully offset in cost of sales), higher DSM program revenue of $3 million (offset in operating expense), 2.4% higher wholesale sales volumes and 0.1% higher retail sales volumes.

Operating income decreased $4 million for 2017 compared to 2016largely due to higher maintenance expense of $52 million for additional wind-powered generating facilities and the timing of fossil-fueled generation maintenance, higher depreciation and amortization of $21 million and higher property and other taxes of $7 million, partially offset by higher electric gross margins of $76 million, excluding the impact of an increase in electric DSM program revenue of $22 million (offset in operating expense), and higher natural gas gross margins of $5 million, excluding the impact of an increase in gas DSM program revenue of $3 million (offset in operating expense). Electric gross margins were higher due to higher recoveries through bill riders, higher retail sales volumes, higher wholesale revenue and higher transmission revenue, partially offset by higher coal-fueled generation and purchased power costs. The increase in depreciation and amortization reflects $38 million related to wind generation and other plant placed in-service and higher accruals for Iowa regulatory arrangements of $14 million, partially offset by a reduction of $31 million from lower depreciation rates implemented in December 2016.

Operating revenue increased $116 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to higher electric operating revenue of $148 million, partially offset by lower natural gas operating revenue of $24 million and lower other operating revenue of $8 million.February 2021 polar vortex weather event. Electric operating revenue increased due to higher retail revenue of $112$198 million and higher wholesale and other revenue of $36$192 million. RetailElectric retail revenue increased $47primarily due to higher recoveries through adjustment clauses of $116 million (fully offset in expense, primarily cost of sales), higher customer volumes of $63 million and price impacts of $19 million from higher electric rateschanges in Iowa effective January 1, 2016, $33 million from non-weather-related usage factors, including higher industrial sales volumes and $30 million from warmer cooling season temperatures, net of warmer winter temperatures in 2016.mix. Electric retail customer volumes increased 3.8% from5.8% due to increased usage of certain industrial customers and the favorable impact of temperatures and industrial growth.weather. Electric wholesale and other revenue increased primarily due to higher average wholesale prices of $25$116 million and higher transmission revenue of $17 million related to Multi-Value Projects, which are expected to increase as projects are constructed, partially offset by lower wholesale volumes of $6$71 million. Natural gas operating revenue decreased due

Earnings increased $65 million for 2021 compared to a lower average per-unit cost of gas sold of $42 million, which is offset in cost of sales, and 0.5% lower retail sales volumes, primarily from warmer winter temperatures in 2016, partially offset by 10.1% higher wholesale volumes. Other operating revenue decreased2020, primarily due to the completion of major projects of a nonregulated utility construction subsidiary in 2015.


Operating income increased $115 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to the higher electric operating revenue, lower energy costsutility margin of $24$190 million reflecting lower coal-fueled generation in part due to greater wind-powered generation, higher purchased power volumes and higher natural gas-fueled generation, lower fossil-fueled generation maintenance of $24 million from planned outages in 2015 and lower generation operations costs of $7 million,a favorable income tax benefit, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $70$198 million, higher operations and maintenance expense of $20 million and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds of $8 million. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to the higher retail and wholesale revenues, partially offset by higher thermal generation and purchased power costs. The favorable income tax benefit was largely due to higher PTCs recognized of $64 million, from new wind-powered generationgenerating facilities placed in-service, partially offset by state income tax impacts. The increase in depreciation and other plantamortization expense was primarily due to the impacts of certain regulatory mechanisms and additional assets placed in-service. Operations and maintenance expense increased primarily due to higher costs associated with additional wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service and an accrual related to an Iowa regulatory revenue sharing arrangement, higher other generation maintenance of $13 million primarily from the addition of wind turbines and higher operating expense recovered through bill riders of $14 million.natural gas distribution costs, partially offset by 2020 costs associated with storm restoration activities.


NV Energy


Operating revenue increased $120$717 million for 20172022 compared to 20162021, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $134$668 million partially offset by lowerand higher natural gas operating revenue of $11 million.$51 million from a higher average per-unit cost of natural gas sold (fully offset in cost of sales). Electric operating revenue increased primarily due to higher retail revenue of $127 million and higher transmission revenue of $9 million. Electric retail revenue increased due to $198 million from higherfully-bundled energy rates primarily from energy costs (offset(fully offset in cost of sales) of $636 million, higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals of $15 million and higher customer volumes of $6 million. Electric retail customer volumes increased 2.2%, $40 million from higher distribution only service revenue and impact fees receivedprimarily due to customers purchasing energy from alternative providers and becoming distribution only service customers, $18 million from an increase in the average number customers and $10 million higher customer usage mainly from the favorable impacts of weather,customers, partially offset by $114the unfavorable impact of weather.

Earnings decreased $12 million from lower commercial and industrial revenue, mainly from customers purchasing energy from alternative providers, and $23 million of lower energy efficiency program revenue (offset in operating expense). Electric retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 1.5%for 2022 compared to 2016. Natural gas operating revenue decreased due to lower energy rates, partially offset by higher customer usage.

Operating income decreased $5 million for 2017 compared to 2016 due to $25 million of operating expenses related to Nevada Power's regulatory rate review, partially offset by higher electric gross margins of $20 million, excluding the impact of a decrease in energy efficiency program revenue (offset in operating expense) of $23 million. Electric gross margins were higher due to increased electric operating revenue of $157 million, excluding the impact of decreased energy efficiency program revenues, partially offset by increased energy costs of $137 million. Energy costs increased due to lower net deferred power costs of $85 million, a higher average cost of fuel for generation of $44 million and higher purchased power costs.

Operating revenue decreased $456 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to lower electric operating revenue of $427 million, lower natural gas operating revenue of $27 million,2021, primarily due to lower energy rates partially offset by higher customer usage,operations and lower other operating revenue of $2 million. Electric operating revenue decreased due to lower retail revenue of $414 million and lower wholesale, transmission and other revenue of $13 million. Retail revenue decreased primarily due to $431 million from lower retail rates primarily from lower energy costs which are passed on to customers through deferred energy adjustment mechanisms and $28 million from lower customer usage, partially offset by $38 million from higher customer growth, $11 million from higher customer usage primarily due to the impacts of weather and $4 million of higher energy efficiency rate revenue (offset in operating expense). Electric retail customer volumes were flat compared to 2015.

Operating income decreased $42 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to higher operatingmaintenance expense of $27$24 million, primarily due to benefits from changes in contingent liabilities in 2015, regulatory disallowances in 2016 and higher energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue), higher depreciation and amortization expense of $11$17 million, due to higher plant in-serviceinterest expense of $15 million, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and lower electric margins of $2 million. Electric margins were lower due to the lower electric operating revenue offset by lower energyhigher non-service benefit plan costs of $425 million. Energy costs decreased due to lower net deferred power costs of $413 million and a lower average cost of fuel for generation of $69$11 million, partially offset by higher purchased powerinterest and dividend income of $36 million from carrying charges on regulatory balances and higher electric utility margin of $32 million. Operations and maintenance expense increased mainly due to higher general and plant maintenance costs and an unfavorable change in earnings sharing at the Nevada Utilities. Depreciation and amortization expense increased mainly from additional assets placed in-service. Electric utility margin increased mainly due to higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals of $57 million.$15 million and higher electric retail customer volumes.

Northern Powergrid


Operating revenue decreased $46increased $253 million for 20172021 compared to 20162020, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $252 million. Electric operating revenue increased primarily due to higher fully-bundled energy rates (fully offset in cost of sales) of $229 million, a $120 million one-time bill credit in the stronger United States dollarfourth quarter of $48 million2020 resulting from a regulatory rate review decision (fully offset in operations and lower distribution revenuesmaintenance and income tax expenses) and higher retail customer volumes of $23$10 million, partially offset by lower base tariff general rates of $71 million at Nevada Power and a favorable regulatory decision in 2020. Electric retail customer volumes increased 3.3%, primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, higher smart meter revenuecustomer usage and the favorable impact of $25weather.

92


Earnings increased $29 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower operations and maintenance expense of $90 million, lower income tax expense mainly from the impacts of ratemaking, lower interest expense of $21 million, higher interest and dividend income of $16 million and lower pension expense of $10 million, partially offset by lower electric utility margin of $97 million and higher depreciation and amortization expense of $47 million. Distribution revenueOperations and maintenance expense decreased primarily due to lower units distributedregulatory deferrals and amortizations and lower earnings sharing at the Nevada Utilities. Electric utility margin decreased primarily due to lower base tariff general rates at Nevada Power and a favorable regulatory decision in 2020, partially offset by higher retail customer volumes. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was mainly due to the regulatory amortization of $13decommissioning costs and additional assets placed in-service.

Northern Powergrid

Operating revenue increased $177 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher distribution revenue of $167 million and higher revenue of $158 million, due to a gas project that commenced commercial operation in March 2022 and a solar project that commenced commercial operation in July 2022, partially offset by $155 million from the stronger U.S. dollar. Distribution revenue increased primarily due to the recovery of Supplier of Last Resort payments of $135 million (fully offset in 2016cost of the December 2013 customer rebatesales) and higher tariff rates of $10 million and unfavorable movements on regulatory provisions of $7$78 million, partially offset by a 4.6% decline in units distributed of $36 million.

Earnings increased $138 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a deferred income tax charge of $109 million related to a June 2021 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023, the higher distribution tariff rates and improved earnings of $47 million from the new gas and solar projects, partially offset by $41 million from the stronger U.S. dollar, the decline in units distributed and higher distribution-related operating and depreciation expenses of $25 million.

Operating revenue increased $166 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher distribution revenue of $80 million, mainly from increased tariff rates of $5 million. Operating income decreased $58$40 million and a 3.2% increase in units distributed totaling $26 million, and $77 million from the weaker U.S. dollar.

Earnings increased $46 million for 20172021 compared to 2016 mainly2020, primarily due to the stronger United Stateshigher distribution revenue, lower write-offs of gas exploration costs of $36 million, $16 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, of $26 million, higherfavorable pension expense of $24 million, mainly due to the 2017 settlement loss recognized due to higher lump sum payments, and the lower distribution revenue, partially offset by write-offs of hydrocarbon well exploration costs in 2016 totaling $19 million.


Operating revenue decreased $145 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to the stronger United States dollar of $127 million, lower distribution revenues of $28$14 million and lower contracting revenue of $5 million, partially offset by higher smart meter revenue of $18 million. Distribution revenue decreased due to the recovery in 2015 of the December 2013 customer rebate of $22 million, lower units distributed and unfavorable movements on regulatory provisionsinterest expense of $8 million, partially offset by higher tariff rates. Operating income decreased $99 million for 2016 compared to 2015 mainly due to the stronger United States dollar of $61 million, the lower distribution revenue, higher depreciationtax expense of $25 million from additional distribution and smart meter assets placed in-service and higher write-offsdistribution-related operating and depreciation expenses of hydrocarbon well exploration costs$29 million. Earnings in 2021 included a deferred income tax charge of $15$109 million partially offset byrelated to a June 2021 enacted increase in the higher smart meter revenue and lower pension costs.United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023, while earnings in 2020 included a deferred income tax charge of $35 million related to a July 2020 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 17% to 19% effective April 1, 2020.


BHE Pipeline Group


Operating revenue increased $15$300 million for 20172022 compared to 20162021, primarily due to higher transportation revenuesoperating revenue of $33$242 million at BHE GT&S and $47 million at Northern Natural Gas. The increase in operating revenue at BHE GT&S was primarily due to higher gas salesnonregulated revenue of $19$109 million related to system and operational balancing activities (largely offset in cost of sales) from favorable commodity prices, an increase in regulated gas transportation and storage services rates due to the settlement of EGTS' general rate case of $101 million and higher LNG revenue of $56 million at Cove Point, largely from favorable variable revenue, partially offset by lower gas sales of $49 million at EGTS from operational and system balancing activities. The increase in operating revenue at Northern Natural Gas was mainly due to higher transportation revenue of $63 million offset by lower gas sales of $14 million from system balancing activities. The variances in transportation revenue and gas sales included favorable impacts recognized of $49 million and $77 million, respectively, from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event. Excluding this item, transportation revenue increased $112 million due to higher volumes and rates and gas sales increased $63 million (largely offset in cost of sales).

Earnings increased $233 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher earnings of $232 million at BHE GT&S. Earnings at BHE GT&S increased mainly due to the impacts of the EGTS general rate case of $124 million, favorable income tax adjustments, lower operations and maintenance and property and other tax expense of $30 million, higher margin of $26 million from nonregulated activities and increased earnings at Cove Point of $16 million.

93


Operating revenue increased $1,966 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $1,828 million of incremental revenue at BHE GT&S, acquired in November 2020, higher gas sales of $115 million ($38 million largely offset in costs of sales) at Northern Natural Gas and higher transportation revenue of $29 million at Kern River largely due to higher rates and volumes, partially offset by lower transportation revenuesrevenue of $40 million at Kern River. Operating income increased $20 million for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to the higher transportation revenues at Northern Natural Gas and a reduction in expenses and regulatory liabilities related to the impact of an alternative rate structure approved by the FERC at Kern River, partially offset by higher operating expenses at Northern Natural Gas.

Operating revenue decreased $38 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to lower gas sales of $25$24 million at Northern Natural Gas relatedprimarily due to system and operational balancing activities, which are largely offsetlower volumes. The variances in cost ofgas sales and a $20transportation revenue at Northern Natural Gas included favorable impacts of $77 million reduction inand $49 million, respectively, from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event.

Earnings increased $279 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $244 million of incremental earnings at BHE GT&S, favorable earnings of $19 million at Kern River from the higher transportation revenues,revenue and higher earnings of $15 million at Northern Natural Gas, primarily due to higher gross margin on gas sales and higher transportation revenue, each due to the favorable impacts of the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, offset by the lower transportation revenue.

BHE Transmission

Operating revenue increased $1 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher nonregulated revenue from wind-powered generating facilities, partially offset by a$27 million from the stronger U.S. dollar.

Earnings for 2022 were equal to 2021, primarily due to improved equity earnings from ETT offset by $7 million increase in storage revenues at Northern Natural Gas. from the stronger U.S. dollar.

Operating income decreased $9revenue increased $72 million for 20162021 compared to 20152020, primarily due to $47 million from the lower transportation revenuesweaker U.S. dollar, a regulatory decision received in November 2020 at AltaLink and higher depreciationrevenue from the Montana-Alberta Tie Line of $11 million.

Earnings increased $16 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $12 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, higher earnings from the Montana-Alberta Tie Line and lower nonregulated interest expense at BHE Canada, partially offset by the higher storage revenues and lower operating expenses.

BHE Transmission

Operating revenue increased $197 million for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due toimpact of a one-time reduction of $200 million from the 2015-2016 GTAregulatory decision received in May 2016April 2020 at AltaLink, a weaker United States dollar of $19 million and $15 million from additional assets placed in service, partially offset by more favorable regulatory decisions in 2016. Operating income increased $230 million for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to the higher operating revenue from the 2015-2016 GTA decision that required AltaLink to refund $200 million to customers in 2016 through reduced monthly billings for the change from receiving cash during construction for the return on construction work-in-progress in rate base to recording allowance for borrowed and equity funds used during construction related to construction expenditures during the 2011 to 2014 time period. This amount is offset with higher capitalized interest and allowance for equity funds. Operating income was also favorably impacted by lower operating expense primarily due to reduced impairments of nonregulated natural gas-fueled generation assets of $21 million and a weaker United States dollar of $11 million.AltaLink.


Operating revenue decreased $90 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to a one-time reduction of $200 million from the 2015-2016 GTA decision received in May 2016 at AltaLink, AltaLink's change to the flow through method of recognizing income tax expense of $45 million, which is offset in income tax expense, and the stronger United States dollar of $20 million, partially offset by $175 million from additional assets placed in-service and recovery of higher costs. Operating income decreased $168 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to the lower operating revenues at AltaLink, a $26 million impairment related to nonregulated natural gas-fueled generation assets and the stronger United States dollar of $5 million.

BHE Renewables


Operating revenue increased $95$13 million for 20172022 compared to 2016 due to additional wind and solar capacity placed in-service of $57 million, higher generation at the Solar Star projects of $31 million due to transformer related forced outages in 2016 and higher production at the Casecnan project of $24 million2021, primarily due to higher rainfall,wind, geothermal, and solar revenues of $140 million from higher generation and pricing, partially offset by lower generationnatural gas revenues of $11$72 million at the existing wind projects due to a lower wind resource andfrom lower generation at the Topaz projectand hedge losses, lower hydro revenues of $6$28 million due to a scheduled maintenance outage. Operating incomethe transfer of the Casecnan generating facility to the Philippine government in December 2021 and $27 million from unfavorable changes in the valuation of certain derivative contracts.

Earnings increased $60$174 million for 20172022 compared to 20162021, primarily due to higher wind earnings of $214 million, higher geothermal earnings of $16 million and higher solar earnings of $14 million, partially offset by lower natural gas earnings of $44 million and lower hydro earnings of $18 million due to the increaseCasecnan generating facility transfer. Wind earnings increased due to higher earnings from tax equity investments of $153 million, largely as a result of the unfavorable impacts recognized in operating revenue, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization of $21 million2021 from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event and higher operating expenseproduction tax credits, and higher earnings from owned projects of $18 million, each primarily due to additional wind and solar capacity placed in-service. Operating expense also increased from the scope and timing of maintenance at certain geothermal plants. The higher depreciation and amortization is offset by a reduction of $8 million from the extension of the useful life of certain wind-generating facilities from 25 years to 30 years effective January 2017.$61 million.



Operating revenue increased $15$45 million for 20162021 compared to 20152020, primarily due to higher natural gas, solar, wind and hydro revenues from favorable market conditions and higher generation, at the Pinyon Pines and Jumbo Road projects of $21 million, additional wind capacity placed in-service of $14 million, a favorablepartially offset by an unfavorable change in the valuation of a power purchase agreement derivative of $6$30 million.

Earnings decreased $70 million and higher hydro generationfor 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower wind earnings of $6$83 million, partially offset bylargely from lower geothermal generationtax equity investment earnings of $18$90 million, and lower solar generationhydro earnings of $14$10 million, mainly due to forced outages. Operatinglower income increased $1from a declining financial asset balance, partially offset by higher solar earnings of $22 million, for 2016 compared to 2015mainly due to the higher operating revenue beingand lower depreciation expense. Tax equity investment earnings decreased due to unfavorable results from existing tax equity investments of $165 million, primarily due to the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, and lower commitment fee income, partially offset by higher depreciation expense$87 million of $14 millionearnings from additional wind and solar capacity placed in-service.projects reaching commercial operation.


94


HomeServices


Operating revenue decreased $947 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower brokerage and settlement services revenue of $637 million and lower mortgage revenue of $305 million. The decrease in brokerage and settlement services revenue resulted from an 11% decrease in closed transaction volume driven by 23% fewer closed units at existing companies resulting from rising interest rates and a corresponding slowdown in home sales offset by acquisitions and a 7% increase in average sales price. The lower mortgage revenue was due to a 40% decrease in funded volume, primarily due to a decline in refinance activity resulting from rising interest rates.

Earnings decreased $287 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower earnings from brokerage and settlement services of $142 million and mortgage services of $126 million, largely from the decrease in funded volumes from rising interest rates. Earnings at brokerage and settlement services declined due to the decrease in closed units at existing companies, partially offset by favorable operating expense variances.

Operating revenue increased $642$819 million for 20172021 compared to 20162020, primarily due to higher brokerage revenue of $951 million, partially offset by lower mortgage revenue of $169 million from an increase from acquired businesses totaling $542 million and8% decrease in funded volume due to a 4%decrease in refinance activity. The increase in brokerage revenue was due to a 21% increase in closed transaction volume at existing companies resulting from increases in average home sales prices for existing brokerage businesses. Operating incomeprice and closed units.

Earnings increased $2$12 million for 20172021 compared to 20162020, primarily due to higher earnings from brokerage and franchise businesses,services of $81 million, largely attributable to the increase in closed transaction volume at existing companies, partially offset by lower earnings from brokerage businesses mainly due to higher operating expenses at existing businesses.mortgage services of $68 million from the decrease in refinance activity.

Operating revenue increased $275 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to an increase from acquired businesses totaling $169 million, a 2% increase in closed brokerage units and a 2% increase in average home sales prices for existing brokerage businesses and $34 million of higher mortgage revenue. Operating income increased $28 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to the higher mortgage revenue and from higher earnings from brokerage businesses mainly due to higher net revenues, partially offset by higher operating expenses.


BHE and Other


Operating revenue decreased $82increased $65 million for 20172022 compared to 20162021, primarily due to higher electric and natural gas sales revenue at MES, from favorable electric volumes and natural gas pricing, including changes in unrealized positions on derivative contracts, offset by lower electric pricing and natural gas volumes.

Earnings decreased $3,336 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to the $3,317 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited, unfavorable comparative consolidated state income tax benefits, higher BHE corporate interest expense from an April 2022 debt issuance and unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies, partially offset by $75 million of lower dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway and lower corporate costs.

Operating revenue increased $103 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher electricity and natural gas volumes and lower electricity pricessales revenue at MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC. Operating loss increased $17 million for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to lower margins at MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC.

Operating revenue decreased $104 million for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to lower electricity volumes and natural gas prices at MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC. Operating loss improved $14 million for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to higher margins at MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC.

Consolidated Other Income and Expense Items

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the years ended December 31 is summarized as follows (in millions):
 2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
            
Subsidiary debt$1,399
 $1,378
 $21
 2 % $1,378
 $1,392
 $(14) (1)%
BHE senior debt and other423
 411
 12
 3
 411
 408
 3
 1
BHE junior subordinated debentures19
 65
 (46) (71) 65
 104
 (39) (38)
Total interest expense$1,841
 $1,854
 $(13) (1) $1,854
 $1,904
 $(50) (3)

Interest expense decreased $13 million for 2017 compared to 2016 due to repayments of BHE junior subordinated debentures of $944 million in 2017 and $2.0 billion in 2016, scheduled maturities and principal payments and early redemptions of subsidiary debt, partially offset by debt issuances at MidAmerican Funding, Northern Powergrid, AltaLink and BHE Renewables and higher short-term borrowings at BHE.

Interest expense decreased $50 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to repayments of BHE junior subordinated debentures of $2.0 billion in 2016, scheduled maturities and principal payments and by the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements of $23 million, partially offset by debt issuances at MidAmerican Funding, NV Energy, Northern Powergrid, AltaLink and BHE Renewables.


Capitalized Interest

Capitalized interest decreased $94 million for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to $96 million recorded in the second quarter of 2016MES, from the 2015-2016 GTA decision received in May 2016 at AltaLink, which is offset in operating revenue, and lower construction work-in-progress balances at BHE Renewables, partially offset by higher construction work-in-progress balances at MidAmerican Energy.

Capitalized interest increased $65 million for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to $96 million recorded in the second quarter of 2016 from the 2015-2016 GTA decision received in May 2016 at AltaLink, which is offset in operating revenue, partiallyfavorable pricing offset by lower construction work-in-progress balances at AltaLink and PacifiCorp.volumes.


Allowance for Equity Funds
Allowance for equity fundsEarnings decreased $82$1,773 million for 20172021 compared to 2016 primarily due to $104 million recorded in the second quarter of 2016 from the 2015-2016 GTA decision received in May 2016 at AltaLink, which is offset in operating revenue, partially offset by higher construction work-in-progress balances at MidAmerican Energy.

Allowance for equity funds increased $67 million for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to $104 million recorded in the second quarter of 2016 from the 2015-2016 GTA decision received in May 2016 at AltaLink, which is offset in operating revenue, partially offset by lower construction work-in-progress balances at AltaLink and PacifiCorp.

Interest and Dividend Income
Interest and dividend income decreased $9 million for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to a lower financial asset balance at the Casecnan project and lower dividends from BYD Company Limited.

Interest and dividend income increased $13 million for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to a dividend from BYD Company Limited.

Other, net

Other, net decreased$434 million for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to charges of $439 million from tender offers related to certain long-term debt completed in December 2017.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense

Income tax expense decreased $957 million for 2017 compared to 2016 and the effective tax rate was (22)% for 2017 and 14% for 2016. The effective tax rate decreased2020, primarily due to the net impacts$1,693 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited, $95 million of 2017 Tax Reformhigher dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued in October 2020 to certain subsidiaries of $731 million,Berkshire Hathaway, higher production tax credits of $97 millioncorporate costs and the favorable impacts of rate making of $33 million,higher BHE corporate interest expense from debt issuances in March and October 2020, partially offset by benefits from the resolution of income tax return claims in 2016 of $39 million and deferredfavorable comparative consolidated state income tax benefits of $16 million reflected in 2016 due to a 1% reduction in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate.

The 2017 Tax Reform most notably lowered the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, and created a one-time repatriation tax on undistributed foreign earnings and profits. The $731 million of lower income tax expense was comprised of benefits from reductions in deferred income tax liabilities of $1,150 million, partially offset by an accrual for the deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits totaling $419 million.

Income tax expense decreased $47 million for 2016 compared to 2015 and the effective tax rate was 14% for 2016 and 16% for 2015. The effective tax rate decreased due to higher production tax credits of $107 million, the resolution of income tax return claims from prior years of $28 million and favorable impacts of rate making of $24 million, partially offset by unfavorable United States income taxes on foreign earnings of $46 million and lower deferred income tax benefits of $23 million due to a 1% reduction in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate in 2016 compared to a 2% reduction in 2015.

Federal renewable electricity production tax credits are earned as energy from qualifying wind-powered generating facilities is produced and sold based on a per kilowatt rate as prescribed pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law and are eligible for the credit for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in-service. A credit of $0.024 per kilowatt hour was applied to 2017 production and a credit of $0.023 per kilowatt hour was applied to 2016 and 2015 production, respectively, which resulted in production tax credits of $495 million in 2017, $398 million in 2016 and $291 million in 2015.


Equity (Loss) Income

Equity (loss) income for the years ended December 31 is summarized as follows (in millions):
 2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
Equity (loss) income:               
ETT$(62) $95
 $(157) * $95
 $81
 $14
 17%
Tax equity investments(120) (10) (110) * (10) (1) (9) *
Agua Caliente24
 25
 (1) (4)% 25
 24
 1
 4
HomeServices6
 6
 
 
 6
 6
 
 
Other1
 7
 (6) (86) 7
 5
 2
 40
Total equity (loss) income$(151) $123
 $(274) * $123
 $115
 $8
 7

* Not meaningful

Equity (loss) income decreased $274 million for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to the impacts of 2017 Tax Reform, which decreased equity income by $228 million mainly due to equity earnings charges recognized totaling $154 million for amounts to be returned to the customers of equity investments in regulated entities. These investments include pass-through entities for income tax purposes and the lower equity income is entirely offset by lower income tax expense as a result of benefits from reductions in deferred income tax liabilities. Equity income also decreased due to lower pre-tax equity earnings from tax equity investments mainly due to unfavorable operating results and lower equity earnings at Electric Transmission Texas, LLC primarily due to the impacts of new retail rates effective March 2017.

Equity income increased $8 million for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to higher equity earnings of $14$17 million at Electric Transmission Texas, LLC from continued investment and additional plant placed in-service, partially offset by a pre-tax loss of $9 million from tax equity investments at BHE Renewables.MES.


Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased $12 million for 2017 compared to 2016 mainly due to higher earnings at HomeServices' franchise business.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


Each of BHE's direct and indirect subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity separate and apart from BHE and its other subsidiaries. It should not be assumed that the assets of any subsidiary will be available to satisfy BHE's obligations or the obligations of its other subsidiaries. However, unrestricted cash or other assets that are available for distribution may, subject to applicable law, regulatory commitments and the terms of financing and ring-fencing arrangements for such parties, be advanced, loaned, paid as dividends or otherwise distributed or contributed to BHE or affiliates thereof. The Company's long-term debt may include provisions that allow BHE or its subsidiaries to redeem such debt in whole or in part at any time. These provisions generally include make-whole premiums. Refer to Note 1718 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding the limitation of distributions from BHE's subsidiaries.



95


As of December 31, 2017,2022, the Company's total net liquidity was as follows (in millions):
BHE Pipeline
MidAmericanNVNorthernBHEGroup and
 BHEPacifiCorpFundingEnergyPowergridCanadaHomeServicesOtherTotal
 
Cash and cash equivalents$32$641$261$108$37$56$239 $217$1,591 
   
Credit facilities(1)
3,5001,2001,5096502967932,925 10,873 
Less: 
Short-term debt(245)(120)(197)(557)(1,119)
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(249)(370)(1)— (620)
Net credit facilities3,2559511,1396501765952,368 9,134 
Total net liquidity$3,287$1,592$1,400$758$213$651$2,607 $217$10,725 
Credit facilities:      
Maturity dates202520252023, 202520252025, 20262023, 2026, 20272023, 2026 
     MidAmerican NV Northern      
 BHE PacifiCorp Funding Energy Powergrid AltaLink Other Total
                
Cash and cash equivalents$346
 $14
 $172
 $62
 $55
 $44
 $242
 $935
  
              
Credit facilities(1)
3,600
 1,000
 909
 650
 203
 1,054
 1,635
 9,051
Less:               
Short-term debt(3,331) (80) 
 
 
 (345) (732) (4,488)
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(7) (130) (370) (80) 
 (7) 
 (594)
Net credit facilities262
 790
 539
 570
 203
 702
 903
 3,969
                
Total net liquidity$608
 $804
 $711
 $632
 $258
 $746
 $1,145
 $4,904
Credit facilities: 
  
  
    
    
  
Maturity dates2018, 2020
 2020
 2018, 2020
 2020
 2020
 2018, 2019, 2022
 2018, 2022
  


(1)    Includes amounts borrowed$55 million drawn on a short-term loan totaling $600 millioncapital expenditure and other uncommitted credit facilities at BHE that was repaid in full in January 2018.Northern Powergrid.


Refer to Note 89 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding the Company's credit facilities, letters of credit, equity commitments and other related items.


Operating Activities


Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $6.07$9.4 billion and $6.06$8.7 billion, respectively. The increase was primarily due to an increase in income tax receipts and improved operating results, changes in working capital and the payment for the USA Power litigation in 2016, partially offset by a reductionchanges in income tax receipts.regulatory assets and working capital.


Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $6.1$8.7 billion and $7.0$6.2 billion, respectively. The changeincrease was primarily due to lower income tax receipts$970 million of $618 millionincremental net cash flows from operating activities at BHE GT&S, improved operating results and payment for the USA Power litigation of $123 million.changes in working capital.


The timing of the Company's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.

The 2017 Tax Reform reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, creates a one-time repatriation tax of foreign earnings and profits to be paid over the next eight years, eliminates bonus depreciation on qualifying regulated utility assets acquired after September 27, 2017 and extends and modifies the additional first-year bonus depreciation for non-regulated property. BHE's regulated subsidiaries anticipate passing the benefits of lower tax expense to customers through regulatory mechanisms. The 2017 Tax Reform and the related regulatory outcomes will result in lower revenue, income taxes and cash flow in future years. BHE does not expect the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment to have a material adverse impact on its cash flows, subject to actual regulatory outcomes, which will be determined based on rulings by regulatory commissions expected in 2018.


In December 2015, the Protecting Americans from Tax Hikes Act of 2015 ("PATH") was signed into law, extending bonus depreciation for qualifying property acquired and placed in-service before January 1, 2020 (bonus depreciation rates were set at 50% in 2015-2017, 40% in 2018, and 30% in 2019), with an additional year for certain longer lived assets. Production tax credits were extended and phased-out for wind power and other forms of non-solar renewable energy projects that begin construction before the end of 2019. Production tax credits are maintained at full value through 2016, at 80% of the published rate in 2017, at 60% of the published rate in 2018, and 40% of the published rate in 2019. Investment tax credits were extended and phased-down for solar projects that are under construction before the end of 2021 (investment tax credit rates are 30% through 2019, 26% in 2020 and 22% in 2021; they revert to the statutory rate of 10% thereafter). The Company's cash flows from operations are expected to benefit from PATH due to bonus depreciation on qualifying assets through 2019 and from the 2017 Tax Reform for non-regulated property through 2026, production tax credits through 2029 and investment tax credits earned on qualifying wind and solar projects through 2021, respectively. As a result of 2017 Tax Reform, bonus depreciation on qualifying assets acquired after September 27, 2017 is eliminated for regulated utility property and is extended and modified for non-regulated property. The Company believes property acquired on or before September 27, 2017 will remain subject to PATH.


Investing Activities


Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $(6.1)$(7.8) billion and $(5.7)$(5.8) billion,, respectively. The change was primarily due to the July 2021 receipt of $1.3 billion due to the termination of the second Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement" with Dominion Questar, higher capital expenditures of $894 million and higher cash paid for acquisitions, of $1.0 billion, partially offset by lower capital expenditures of $519 million and lower funding of tax equity investments. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.


Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $(5.7)$(5.8) billion and $(6.2)$(13.2) billion,, respectively. The change was primarily due to lower capital expenditures of $785 million, partially offset by higher funding of tax equity investments.investments, lower cash paid for acquisitions and the July 2021 receipt of $1.3 billion due to the termination of the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.


Acquisitions
96



Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Business Acquisition
In 2017,
On November 1, 2020, BHE completed its acquisition of substantially all of the Company completed various acquisitions totaling $1.1natural gas transmission and storage business of DEI and Dominion Questar, exclusive of the Questar Pipeline Group. Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated July 3, 2020, BHE paid approximately $2.5 billion netin cash, after post-closing adjustments (the "GT&S Cash Consideration").

On October 5, 2020, BHE entered into the "Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement") with Dominion Questar providing for BHE's purchase of the Questar Pipeline Group from Dominion Questar after receipt of HSR Approval for a cash acquired. The purchase price of approximately $1.3 billion (the "Q-Pipe Cash Consideration"), subject to adjustment for each acquisition was allocated to the assets acquiredcash and liabilities assumed, which primarily related to residential real estate brokerage businesses, development and construction costs for the 110-megawatt Alamo 6 and the 50-megawatt Pearl solar projects, and the remaining 25% interest in the Silverhawk natural gas-fueled generation facility at Nevada Power. As a resultindebtedness as of the various acquisitions,closing. Under the Company acquired assetsQ-Pipe Purchase Agreement, BHE delivered the Q-Pipe Cash Consideration of $1.1approximately $1.3 billion assumed liabilitiesto Dominion Questar on November 2, 2020.

On July 9, 2021, Dominion Questar and DEI delivered a written notice to BHE stating that BHE and Dominion Questar have mutually elected to terminate the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement. On July 14, 2021, BHE received the Purchase Price Repayment Amount of $487 million and recognized goodwill of $508 million.approximately $1.3 billion in cash.

In 2016 and 2015, the Company completed various acquisitions totaling $66 million and $164 million, net of cash acquired, respectively. The purchase price for each acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The assets acquired consisted of property, plant and equipment, development and construction costs for renewable projects, other working capital items, goodwill of $50 million and $33 million, respectively, and other identifiable intangible assets. The liabilities assumed totaled $54 million and $84 million, respectively.



Financing Activities


Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20172022 were $274 million.$(1.0) billion. Sources of cash totaled $4.1 billion and consisted of net proceeds from short-term debt of $2.4 billion and proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances totaling $1.7 billion. Uses of cash totaled $3.9 billion and consisted mainly of $2.3proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances of $2.9 billion for repayments ofand proceeds from BHE senior debt issuances of $1.0 billion. Uses of cash totaled $4.9 billion and junior subordinated debentures, $1.0 billion forconsisted mainly of repayments of subsidiary debt totaling $1.5 billion, purchases of common stock of $870 million, net repayments of short-term debt totaling $867 million, preferred stock redemptions totaling $800 million and tender offer premiums paiddistributions to noncontrolling interests of $435$524 million.


Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20162021 were $(690) million.$(3.1) billion. Sources of cash totaled $3.2$2.4 billion and consisted of proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances. Uses of cash totaled $5.5 billion and consisted mainly of proceeds from subsidiary debtpreferred stock redemptions totaling $2.3$2.1 billion, and net proceeds from short-term debt of $880 million. Uses of cash totaled $3.9 billion and consisted mainly of $1.8 billion for repayments of subsidiary debt andtotaling $2.0 billion, distributions to noncontrolling interests of $488 million, repayments of BHE subordinatedsenior debt totaling $2 billion.$450 million and net repayments of short-term debt totaling $276 million.


Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 20152020 were $(255) million.$7.1 billion. Sources of cash totaled $2.5$11.7 billion and consisted of proceeds from BHE senior debt issuances of $5.2 billion, proceeds from preferred stock issuances of $3.8 billion and proceeds from subsidiary debt.debt issuances totaling $2.7 billion. Uses of cash totaled $2.7$4.5 billion and consisted mainly of $1.4$2.8 billion for repayments of subsidiary debt, repayments of BHE subordinated debt totaling $850 million and net repayments of short-term debt of $421 million.$939 million and $350 million for repayments of BHE senior debt.



Debt Repurchases

The Company may from time to time seek to acquire its outstanding debt securities through cash purchases in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Any debt securities repurchased by the Company may be reissued or resold by the Company from time to time and will depend on prevailing market conditions, the Company's liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.


Preferred Stock Issuance

On October 29, 2020, BHE issued $3.75 billion of its 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in order to fund the GT&S Cash Consideration and the Q-Pipe Cash Consideration.

Preferred Stock Redemptions

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, BHE redeemed at par 800,006 and 2,100,012 shares of its 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock from certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for $800 million and $2.1 billion.

97


Common Stock Transactions

For the year ended December 31, 2022, BHE purchased 740,961 shares of its common stock held by Mr. Gregory E. Abel, BHE's Chair, for $870 million. The purchase was pursuant to the terms of BHE's Shareholders Agreement.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, BHE repurchased 180,358 shares of its common stock for $126 million.

There were no common stock repurchases for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Future Uses of Cash


The Company has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the issuance of commercial paper, the use of unsecured revolving credit facilities, the issuance of equity and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which BHE and each subsidiary has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including regulatory approvals, its credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry and project finance markets, among other items.


Capital Expenditures


The Company has significant future capital requirements. Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, impacts to customers' rates; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisitions of existing assets.


The Company's historical and forecast capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, by reportable segment for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
PacifiCorp$2,540 $1,513 $2,166 $3,579 $3,069 $3,986 
MidAmerican Funding1,836 1,912 1,869 2,451 2,149 1,791 
NV Energy675 749 1,113 1,614 1,729 1,622 
Northern Powergrid682 742 768 569 632 659 
BHE Pipeline Group659 1,128 1,157 1,001 855 926 
BHE Transmission372 279 200 203 300 433 
BHE Renewables95 225 138 251 399 316 
HomeServices36 42 48 54 57 57 
BHE and Other(1)
(130)21 46 — 
Total$6,765 $6,611 $7,505 $9,726 $9,192 $9,790 
(1)BHE and Other includes intersegment eliminations.

98


 Historical Forecast
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
            
PacifiCorp$916
 $903
 $769
 $1,212
 $2,100
 $1,802
MidAmerican Funding1,448
 1,637
 1,776
 2,396
 1,711
 897
NV Energy571
 529
 456
 524
 557
 448
Northern Powergrid674
 579
 579
 700
 621
 478
BHE Pipeline Group240
 226
 286
 435
 344
 234
BHE Transmission966
 466
 334
 243
 221
 292
BHE Renewables1,034
 719
 323
 869
 86
 87
HomeServices16
 20
 37
 48
 29
 29
BHE and Other10
 11
 11
 16
 13
 12
Total$5,875
 $5,090
 $4,571
 $6,443
 $5,682
 $4,279
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Wind generation$2,125 $1,339 $774 $2,201 $1,710 $1,197 
Electric distribution1,705 1,679 1,806 1,860 1,732 2,337 
Electric transmission968 823 1,725 1,973 2,154 2,837 
Natural gas transmission and storage6401,068945 824 617 843 
Solar generation16157422 248 630 450 
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage— 23 16 317 392 575 
Other1,311 1,522 1,817 2,303 1,957 1,551 
Total$6,765 $6,611 $7,505 $9,726 $9,192 $9,790 

 Historical Forecast
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
            
Wind generation$1,177
 $1,712
 $1,291
 $2,662
 $2,219
 $1,192
Solar generation786
 69
 129
 36
 42
 18
Electric transmission936
 448
 343
 248
 365
 551
Environmental134
 70
 91
 104
 29
 53
Other growth394
 414
 560
 741
 609
 258
Operating2,448
 2,377
 2,157
 2,652
 2,418
 2,207
Total$5,875
 $5,090
 $4,571
 $6,443
 $5,682
 $4,279



The Company's historical and forecast capital expenditures consisted mainly of the following:
Wind generation includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for the following:
Construction of wind-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy totaling $657 million for 2017, $943 million for 2016 and $931 million for 2015. MidAmerican Energy placed in-service 334 MW (nominal ratings) during 2017, 600 MW (nominal ratings) during 2016 and 608 MW (nominal ratings) during 2015. In August 2016, the IUB issued an order approving ratemaking principles related to MidAmerican Energy's construction of up to 2,000 MW (nominal ratings) of additional wind-powered generating facilities, including the additions in 2017 and facilities expected to be placed in-service in 2018 and 2019. MidAmerican Energy expects to spend $1,132 million in 2018, $1,038 million in 2019 and $329 million in 2020 for these additional wind-powered generating facilities. The ratemaking principles establish a cost cap of $3.6 billion, including AFUDC, and a fixed rate of return on equity of 11.0% over the proposed 40-year useful lives of those facilities in any future Iowa rate proceeding. The cost cap ensures that as long as total costs are below the cap, the investment will be deemed prudent in any future Iowa rate proceeding. Additionally, the ratemaking principles modify the revenue sharing mechanism currently in effect. The revised sharing mechanism will be effective in 2018 and will be triggered each year by actual equity returns exceeding a weighted average return on equity for MidAmerican Energy calculated annually. Pursuant to the change in revenue sharing, MidAmerican Energy will share 100% of the revenue in excess of this trigger with customers. Such revenue sharing will reduce coal and nuclear generation rate base, which is intended to mitigate future base rate increases. MidAmerican Energy expects all of these wind-powered generating facilities to qualify for 100% of the federal production tax credits available.
Construction of wind-powered generating facilities at PacifiCorp totaling $5 million for 2017 and $31 million for 2016. The new wind-powered generating facilities are expected to be placed in-service in 2020. Planned spending for the new wind-powered generating facilities totals $200 million in 2018, $421 million in 2019 and $588 million in 2020, plus approximately $300 million for an assumed vendor supplied financing transaction to be paid in 2020 that is not included in the table above. The energy production from the new wind-powered generating facilities is expected to qualify for 100% of the federal production tax credits available.
Construction of wind-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables totaling $109 million for 2017, $602 million for 2016 and $246 million for 2015. BHE Renewables placed in-service 472 MW during 2016 and 300 MW during 2015. BHE Renewables anticipates costs will total an additional $734 million in 2018 for development and construction of up to 512 MW of wind-powered generating facilities.
Repowering certain existing wind-powered generating facilities at PacifiCorp and MidAmerican Energy totaling $520 million for 2017 and $147 million for 2016. The repowering projects entail the replacement of significant components of older turbines. Planned spending for the repowered generating facilities totals $596 million in 2018, $758 million in 2019 and $276 million in 2020. The energy production from such repowered facilities is expected to qualify for 100% of the federal production tax credits available for ten years following each facility's return to service.
Solar generation includes the following:
Construction of the community solar gardens project in Minnesota totaling $121 million for 2017, $56 million for 2016 and $3 million for 2015. BHE Renewables expects to spend an additional $26 million in 2018 to complete the project, which will be comprised of 28 locations with a nominal facilities capacity of 98 MW.
Final construction costs for the Solar Star and Topaz Projects totaling $738 million for 2015. Both projects declared the commercial operation date in accordance with the respective power purchase agreements and achieved completion under the respective engineering, procurement and construction agreements and financing documents in 2015.
Electric transmission includes PacifiCorp's costs associated with main grid reinforcement and theacquisition of wind-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy Gateway Transmission Expansion Program,totaling $72 million for 2022, $540 million for 2021 and $848 million for 2020. MidAmerican Energy placed in-service 294 MWs during 2021 and 729 MWs during 2020. All of these wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in 2021 and 2020 qualify for 100% of PTCs available. PTCs from these projects are excluded from MidAmerican Energy's MVPs approved by the MISOIowa EAC until these generation assets are reflected in base rates. Planned spending for the construction of approximately 250 mileswind-powered generating facilities totals $1,232 million in 2023, $1,032 million in 2024 and $740 million in 2025.
Repowering of 345 kV transmission line located in Iowa and Illinois and ALP's directly assigned projects from the AESO, .
Environmental includes the installation of new or the replacement of existing emissions control equipment at certainwind-powered generating facilities at the Utilities, including installation or upgrade of selective catalytic reduction control systemsMidAmerican Energy totaling $500 million for 2022, $354 million for 2021 and low nitrogen oxide burners$37 million for 2020. Planned spending for repowering totals $20 million in 2023, $179 million in 2024 and $84 million in 2025. MidAmerican Energy expects its repowered facilities to reduce nitrogen oxides, particulate matter control systems, sulfur dioxide emissions control systems and mercury emissions control systems, as well as expendituresmeet IRS guidelines for the managementre-establishment of coal combustion residuals.PTCs for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service.

Construction of new wind-powered generating facilities and construction at existing wind-powered generating facility sites acquired from third parties at PacifiCorp totaling $23 million for 2022, $118 million for 2021 and $1,148 million for 2020. PacifiCorp placed in-service 516 MWs of new wind-powered generating facilities in 2021 and 674 MWs in 2020. Planned spending for the construction of additional new wind-powered generating facilities and those at acquired sites totals $771 million in 2023, $385 million in 2024 and $251 million in 2025 and is primarily for projects totaling approximately 683 MWs that are expected to be placed in-service in 2023 through 2025.

Construction of wind-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables totaling $155 million for 2021. In May 2021, BHE Renewables completed the asset acquisition of a 54-MW wind-powered generating facility located in Iowa. In December 2021, BHE Renewables completed asset acquisitions of 158-MW and 200-MW wind-powered generating facilities located in Texas.
OtherRepowering of wind-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables totaling $45 million for 2022. Planned spending for repowering totals $50 million in 2023.
Electric distribution includes both growth includes projects to deliver power and services to new markets,operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for new customer connections and enhancements to existing customer connections.
Operating includesexpenditures include spending for ongoing distribution systems infrastructure needed at the Utilities and Northern Powergrid, wildfire mitigation, storm damage restoration and repairs and investments in routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
99


Electric transmission includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for the following:
PacifiCorp's transmission investment primarily reflects planned costs for the following Energy Gateway Transmission segments: the 416-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Aeolus substation near Medicine Bow, Wyoming and the Clover substation near Mona, Utah; the 59-mile, 230-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Windstar substation near Glenrock, Wyoming and the Aeolus substation; the 290-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line from the Longhorn substation near Boardman, Oregon to the Hemingway substation near Boise, Idaho; the 14-mile, 345-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Oquirrh substation in the Salt Lake Valley and the Terminal substation near the Salt Lake City Airport; the 40-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Limber substation in central Utah and the Terminal substation; and the195-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Anticline substation near Point of Rocks, Wyoming and the Populus substation in Downey, Idaho. Planned spending for these Energy Gateway Transmission segments that are expected to be placed in-service in 2024 through 2028 totals $1,005 million in 2023, $661 million in 2024 and $763 million in 2025.
Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Planned spending for the expansion programs estimated to be placed in-service in 2026-2028 totals $46 million in 2023, $380 million in 2024 and $502 million in 2025.
Operating expenditures include spending for system reinforcement, upgrades and replacements of facilities to maintain system reliability and investments in routine expenditures for transmission needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Natural gas transmission and storage includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include, among other items, spending for asset modernization and the Northern Natural Gas Twin Cities Area Expansion and Spraberry Compression projects. Operating expenditures include, among other items, spending for pipeline integrity projects, automation and controls upgrades, corrosion control, unit exchanges, compressor modifications, projects related to Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration natural gas storage rules and natural gas transmission, storage and LNG terminalling infrastructure needs to serve existing and expected demand.
Solar generation transmission, distributionincludes growth expenditures, including spending for the following:
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at PacifiCorp totaling 377 MWs of new generation and are expected to be placed in-service in 2026. Planned spending totals $381 million from 2023 through 2025.
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy totaling 141 MWs of small- and utility-scale solar generation, all of which were placed in-service in 2022, with total spend of $119 million in 2022 and $132 million in 2021.
Construction of solar-powered generating facility at the Nevada Utilities includes expenditures for a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada, with commercial operation expected by the end of 2023.
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables' includes expenditures for a 48-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 52 MWs of capacity of co-located battery storage in Kern County, California, with commercial operation expected by November 30, 2024. Planned spending totals $174 million in 2024.
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage includes growth expenditures, including spending for the following:
Construction of 38 MWs of new pumped hydro storage on the North Umpqua River system expected to be placed in-service in 2024 and 2026 as well as other battery storage projects providing approximately 419 MWs of storage that are expected to be placed in-service in 2026 at PacifiCorp. Planned spending for these project totals $398 million from 2023 through 2025. Planned spending for other pumped hydro storage projects that are expected to be placed in-service beyond 2026 totals $95 million from 2023 through 2025
100


Construction at the Nevada Utilities of a 100-MW battery energy storage system co-located with a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada and a 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada, both with commercial operation expected by the end of 2023. Also, a 200-MW battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the Valmy generating station in Humboldt County, Nevada with commercial operation expected by the end of 2025.
Other capital expenditures includes both growth and operating expenditures, including spending for routine expenditures for generation and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.demand, natural gas distribution, technology, and environmental spending relating to emissions control equipment and the management of CCR.


Contractual ObligationsOff-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has contractualcertain investments that are accounted for under the equity method in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, an amount is recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as an equity investment and is increased or decreased for the Company's pro-rata share of earnings or losses, respectively, less any dividends from such investments. Certain equity investments are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of investment tax credits.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company's investments that are accounted for under the equity method had short- and long-term debt of $2.7 billion, unused revolving credit facilities of $122 million and letters of credit outstanding of $88 million. As of December 31, 2022, the Company's pro-rata share of such short- and long-term debt was $1.3 billion, unused revolving credit facilities was $61 million and outstanding letters of credit was $43 million. The entire amount of the Company's pro-rata share of the outstanding short- and long-term debt and unused revolving credit facilities is non-recourse to the Company. The entire amount of the Company's pro-rata share of the outstanding letters of credit is recourse to the Company. Although the Company is generally not required to support debt service obligations of its equity investees, default with respect to this non-recourse short- and long-term debt could result in a loss of invested equity.

Material Cash Requirements
The Company has cash obligationsrequirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition. The following table summarizes the Company's material contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2017 (in millions):
  Payments Due By Periods
    2019- 2021- 2023 and  
  2018 2020 2022 After Total
           
BHE senior debt $1,000
 $350
 $
 $5,146
 $6,496
BHE junior subordinated debentures 
 
 
 100
 100
Subsidiary debt 2,431
 3,427
 2,724
 20,198
 28,780
Interest payments on long-term debt(1)
 1,769
 3,040
 2,760
 16,457
 24,026
Short-term debt 4,488
 
 
 
 4,488
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments(1)
 2,098
 3,072
 2,265
 10,044
 17,479
Construction commitments(1)
 1,120
 62
 
 
 1,182
Operating leases and easements(1)
 180
 298
 232
 1,297
 2,007
Other(1)
 290
 572
 571
 1,189
 2,622
Total contractual cash obligations $13,376
 $10,821
 $8,552
 $54,431
 $87,180

(1)Not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Company has other types of commitmentscondition that arise primarily from unused lines of credit,long- and short-term debt (refer to Note 9, 10 and 11), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 6), firm commitments (refer to Note 16), letters of credit or relate(refer to Note 9), construction and other development costs (Liquidity(refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7 and Note 8)7), uncertain tax positions (Note 11)(refer to Note 12) and asset retirement obligations (Note 13), which have not been included in the above table because the amount and timing of the cash payments are not certain.AROs (refer to Note 14). Refer, where applicable, to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.


Additionally, the Company has invested in projects sponsored by third parties, commonly referred to as tax equity investments. Under the terms of these tax equity investments, the Company has entered into equity capital contribution agreements with the project sponsors that require contributions. The Company has made contributionscash requirements relating to interest payments of $403 million, $584 million and $170 million$35.1 billion on long-term debt, including $2.2 billion due in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and has commitments as of December 31, 2017, subject to satisfaction of certain specified conditions, to provide equity contributions of $265 million in 2018 pursuant to these equity capital contribution agreements as the various projects achieve commercial operation. Once a project achieves commercial operation, the Company enters into a partnership agreement with the project sponsor that directs and allocates the operating profits and tax benefits from the project.2023.


Regulatory Matters


The Company is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussioninformation regarding the Company's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.



Quad Cities Generating Station Operating Status


ExelonConstellation Energy Generation, Company, LLC ("Exelon Generation"Constellation Energy"), the operator of Quad Cities Generating Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station") of which MidAmerican Energy has a 25% ownership interest, announced on June 2, 2016, its intention to shut downreceives financial support for continued operation of Quad Cities Station on June 1, 2018, as a result of Illinois not passing adequate legislation and Quad Cities Station not clearingfrom the 2019-2020 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. capacity auction. MidAmerican Energy expressed to Exelon Generation its desire for the continued operation of the facility through the end of its operating license in 2032 and worked with Exelon Generation on solutions to that end. In December 2016, Illinois passed legislation creating a zero emission standard which went into effect June 1, 2017.enacted by the Illinois legislature in December 2016. The zero emission standard requires the Illinois Power Agency to purchase zero emission creditsZECs and recover the costs from certain ratepayers in Illinois, subject to certain limitations. The proceeds from the zero emission credits willZECs provide Exelon GenerationConstellation Energy additional revenue through 2027 as an incentive for continued operation of Quad Cities Station. For the nuclear assets already in rate base, MidAmerican Energy's customers will not be charged for the subsidy, and MidAmerican Energy willdoes not receive additional revenue from the subsidy.


On February 14, 2017, two lawsuits were filed with
101


The PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ("PJM") capacity market includes a Minimum Offer Price Rule ("MOPR"). If a generation resource is subjected to a MOPR, its offer price in the United States District Court formarket is adjusted to effectively remove the Northern District of Illinois ("Northern District of Illinois") against the Illinois Power Agency alleging that the state’s zero emission creditrevenues it receives through a state government-provided financial support program violates certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution. Both complaints argue thatlike the Illinois zero emission credit program will distortstandard, resulting in a higher offer that may not clear the FERC’s energycapacity market. Prior to December 19, 2019, the PJM MOPR applied only to certain new gas-fueled resources.

On December 19, 2019, the FERC issued an order requiring the PJM to broadly apply the MOPR to all new and existing resources, including nuclear. This greatly expanded the breadth and scope of the PJM's MOPR, which became effective as of the PJM's capacity market auction system of setting wholesale prices. As majority owner and operator offor the 2022-2023 planning year. While the FERC included some limited exemptions, no exemptions were available to state-supported nuclear resources, such as Quad Cities Station, Exelon Generation intervened andStation. The FERC denied rehearing of that order on April 16, 2020. A number of parties, including Constellation Energy, have filed motions to dismisspetitions for review of the FERC's orders in both lawsuits. On July 14, 2017,this proceeding, which remain pending before the Northern District of Illinois granted the motions to dismiss. On July 17, 2017, the plaintiffs filed appeals with the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Parties have filed briefs and presented oral argument. MidAmerican Energy cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits.this proceeding.


On January 9, 2017,While this litigation is pending, the Electric Power Supply AssociationMOPR applied to Quad Cities Station in the capacity auction for the 2022-2023 planning year in May 2021, which prevented Quad Cities Station from clearing in that capacity auction.

At the direction of the PJM Board of Managers, the PJM and its stakeholders developed further MOPR reforms to ensure that the capacity market rules respect and accommodate state resource preferences such as the ZEC programs. The PJM filed two requestsrelated tariff revisions with the FERC seeking to expand Minimum Offer Price Rule ("MOPR")on July 30, 2021, and, on September 29, 2021, the PJM's proposed MOPR reforms became effective by operation of law. Under the new tariff provisions, to apply to existing resources receiving zero emission credit compensation. If successful, an expandedthe MOPR could resultapplied in an increased riskthe capacity auction for the 2023-2024 delivery year but did not restrict the offers of Quad Cities Station, not clearingwhich cleared in futurethe capacity auctionsauction. Requests for rehearing of the FERC's notice establishing the effective date for the PJM's proposed market reforms were filed in October 2021 and Exelon Generationdenied by operation of law on November 4, 2021. Several parties have filed petitions for review of the FERC's orders in this proceeding, which remain pending before the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Assuming the continued effectiveness of the Illinois zero emission standard, Constellation Energy no longer receiving capacity revenues for the facility. As majority owner and operator ofconsiders Quad Cities Station Exelon Generation has filed proteststo be at heightened risk for early retirement. However, to the extent the Illinois zero emission standard does not operate as expected over its full term, Quad Cities Station would be at heightened risk for early retirement. The FERC provided no new mechanism for accommodating state-supported resources like Quad Cities Station other than the existing Fixed Resource Requirement ("FRR") mechanism under which an entire utility zone would be removed from PJM's capacity auction along with sufficient resources to support the load in response to each filing. The timing of the FERC’s decision with respect to both proceedings is currently unknown andsuch zone. Depending on the outcome of these matters is currently uncertain.the proceedings related to the PJM MOPR, the continued effectiveness of the Illinois zero emission standard may be undermined unless the PJM adopts further changes to the MOPR or Illinois implements an FRR mechanism, under which Quad Cities Station would be removed from the PJM's capacity auction.


Environmental Laws and Regulations


The Company is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, RPS,climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, and capital expenditure requirements, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state, local and international agencies. The Company believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many laws and regulations are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and the Company is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for discussion of the Company's forecast environmental-related capital expenditures.regulations.


Collateral and Contingent Features


Debt of BHE and debt and preferred securities of certain of its subsidiaries are rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of the rated company's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt or preferred securities. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.


102


BHE and its subsidiaries have no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. The Company's unsecured revolving credit facilities do not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon their availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facilities are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.



In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the applicable entities' credit ratings from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2017,2022, the Company would have been required to post $440$704 million of additional collateral. The Company's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors. Refer to Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of the Company's collateral requirements specific to its derivative contracts.


Inflation


Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where BHE's subsidiaries operate have not had a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial results. In the United StatesU.S. and Canada, the Regulated Businesses operate under cost-of-service based raterate-setting structures administered by various state and provincial commissions and the FERC. Under these raterate-setting structures, the Regulated Businesses are allowed to include prudent costs in their rates, including the impact of inflation. The price control formula used by the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies incorporates the rate of inflation in determining rates charged to customers. BHE's subsidiaries attempt to minimize the potential impact of inflation on their operations through the use of fuel, energy and other cost adjustment clauses and bill riders, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has certain investments that are accounted for under the equity method in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, an amount is recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as an equity investment and is increased or decreased for the Company's pro-rata share of earnings or losses, respectively, less any dividends from such investments. Certain equity investments are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of investment tax credits.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company's investments that are accounted for under the equity method had short- and long-term debt of $2.5 billion, unused revolving credit facilities of $365 million and letters of credit outstanding of $88 million. As of December 31, 2017, the Company's pro-rata share of such short- and long-term debt was $1.2 billion, unused revolving credit facilities was $151 million and outstanding letters of credit was $43 million. The entire amount of the Company's pro-rata share of the outstanding short- and long-term debt and unused revolving credit facilities is non-recourse to the Company. The entire amount of the Company's pro-rata share of the outstanding letters of credit is recourse to the Company. Although the Company is generally not required to support debt service obligations of its equity investees, default with respect to this non-recourse short- and long-term debt could result in a loss of invested equity.

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting the Company, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates


Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by the Company's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.



Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


The Regulated Businesses prepare their financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, the Regulated Businesses defer the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.


103


The Company continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit the Regulated Businesses' ability to recover their costs. The Company believes theits application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at the federal, state and provincial levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $3.0$5.1 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $7.5$7.4 billion as of December 31, 2017.2022. Refer to Note 67 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Regulated Businesses' regulatory assets and liabilities.

Derivatives

The Company is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk primarily through BHE's ownership of the Utilities as they have an obligation to serve retail customer load in their regulated service territories. The Company also provides nonregulated retail electricity and natural gas services in competitive markets. The Utilities' load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold, and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate short- and long-term debt, future debt issuances and mortgage commitments. Additionally, BHE is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk from its business operations and investments in Great Britain and Canada. Each of BHE's business platforms has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, monitor and report each of the various types of risk involved in its business. The Company employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price, interest rate, and foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, the Company may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, forward sale commitments, or mortgage interest rate lock commitments, to mitigate the Company's exposure to interest rate risk. The Company does not hedge all of its commodity price, interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. Refer to Notes 14 and 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Company's derivative contracts.


Measurement Principles

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which the Company transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, the Company uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent the Company's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. The Company bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations, when available, or internally developed and commercial models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations are obtained from independent brokers, exchanges, direct communication with market participants and actual transactions executed by the Company. Market price quotations are generally readily obtainable for the applicable term of the Company's outstanding derivative contracts; therefore, the Company's forward price curves reflect observable market quotes. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had a net derivative liability of $120 million related to contracts valued using either quoted prices or forward price curves based upon observable market quotes. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to the length of the contract. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, as well as for those contracts that are not actively traded, the Company uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contracts is a function of underlying forward commodity prices, interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of contracts. The assumptions used in these models are important because any changes in assumptions could have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of the contracts. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had a net derivative asset of $103 million related to contracts where the Company uses internal models with significant unobservable inputs.

Classification and Recognition Methodology

The majority of the Company's commodity derivative contracts are probable of inclusion in the rates of its rate-regulated subsidiaries, and changes in the estimated fair value of derivative contracts are generally recorded as net regulatory assets or liabilities. Accordingly, amounts are generally not recognized in earnings until the contracts are settled and the forecasted transaction has occurred. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had $119 million recorded as net regulatory assets related to derivative contracts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets


The Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 20172022 includes goodwill of acquired businesses of $9.7$11.5 billion. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31.31, 2022. Additionally, no indicators of impairment were identified as of December 31, 2017. 2022. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. The Company uses a variety of methods to estimate a reporting unit's fair value, principally discounted projected future net cash flows. Key assumptions used include, but are not limited to, the use of estimated future cash flows; multiples of earnings;earnings or rate base; and an appropriate discount rate. Estimated future cash flows are impacted by, among other factors, growth rates, changes in regulations and rates, ability to renew contracts and estimates of future commodity prices. In estimating future cash flows, the Company incorporates current market information, as well as historical factors. Refer to Note 21 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Company's goodwill.


The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantiallya majority of all property, plant and equipment wasis used in regulated businesses, as of December 31, 2017, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.


The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the asset that are used in thepurposes of impairment analysis, requires judgment regarding what the Company would expect to recover from the future useexercise of the asset. Changes in judgmentjudgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of the fair value or the recoverable amount of thean asset may result frominclude significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, or the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect the Company's results of operations.


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits


Certain of the Company's subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans that cover the majority of employees. The Company recognizes the funded status of the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Funded status is the fair value of plan assets minus the benefit obligation as of the measurement date. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the Company recognized a net liabilityasset totaling $63$206 million for the funded status of the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As of December 31, 2017,2022, amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that were included in net regulatory assets totaled $606$376 million and in AOCI totaled $530 million.$527 million.


The expense and benefit obligations relating to these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are based on actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and healthcare cost trend rates. These key assumptions are reviewed annually and modified as appropriate. The Company believes that the key assumptions utilized in recording obligations under the plans are reasonable based on prior plan experience and current market and economic conditions. Refer to Note 1213 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosures about the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the key assumptions used to calculate the funded status and net periodic benefit cost for these plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.


104


The Company chooses a discount rate based upon high quality debt security investment yields in effect as of the measurement date that corresponds to the expected benefit period. The pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities increase as the discount rate is reduced.


In establishing its assumption as to the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company utilizes the expected asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets. Pension and other postretirement benefits expense increases as the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets decreases. The Company regularly reviews its actual asset allocations and rebalances its investments to its targeted allocations when considered appropriate.


The Company chooses a healthcare cost trend rate that reflects the near and long-term expectations of increases in medical costs and corresponds to the expected benefit payment periods. The healthcare cost trend rate is assumed to gradually decline to 5.00% by 2025,2028, at which point the rate of increase is assumed to remain constant. Refer to Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for healthcare cost trend rate sensitivity disclosures.


The key assumptions used may differ materially from period to period due to changing market and economic conditions. These differences may result in a significant impact to pension and other postretirement benefits expense and the funded status. If changes were to occur for the following key assumptions, the approximate effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements would be as follows (dollars in millions):
Domestic Plans
Other PostretirementUnited Kingdom
Pension PlansBenefit PlansPension Plan
+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%
Effect on December 31, 2022
Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate$(76)$82 $(21)$23 $(75)$86 
Effect on 2022 Periodic Cost:
Discount rate$$(3)$$(1)$(4)$
Expected rate of return on plan assets(13)13 (4)(7)
 Domestic Plans  
     Other Postretirement United Kingdom
 Pension Plans Benefit Plans Pension Plan
 +0.5% -0.5% +0.5% -0.5% +0.5% -0.5%
            
Effect on December 31, 2017           
Benefit Obligations:           
Discount rate$(155) $170
 $(31) $34
 $(197) $222
            
Effect on 2017 Periodic Cost:           
Discount rate$(2) $
 $1
 $
 $(18) $19
Expected rate of return on plan assets(12) 12
 (3) 3
 (10) 10


A variety of factors affect the funded status of the plans, including asset returns, discount rates, mortality assumptions, plan changes and the Company's funding policy for each plan.



Income Taxes


In determining the Company's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by the Company's various regulatory jurisdictions.commissions. The Company's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state, local and foreign income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of the Company's federal, state, local and foreign income tax examinations is uncertain, the Company believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations if any, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial results. Refer to Note 1112 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Company's income taxes.


It is probable the Company's regulated businesses will pass income tax benefitsbenefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to their customers in certain state and provincial jurisdictions.customers. As of December 31, 2017,2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $4.0$2.5 billion and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.


105


The 2017 Tax Reform creates a one-time repatriation taxCompany has not established deferred income taxes on the Company's undistributed foreign corporations' post-1986 accumulated earnings and profits. Therefore, the cumulativeits undistributed foreign earnings were deemed repatriatedthat have been determined by management to the United States as of December 31, 2017. The Company currently does not believe the deemed repatriation has altered the Company's existing assertion that undistributed earnings will be reinvested indefinitely; however, the Company periodically evaluates its capital requirementsrequirements. If circumstances change in the future and that conclusion could change. As a resultportion of the 2017 Tax Reform, futureCompany's undistributed foreign earnings arewere repatriated, the dividends may be subject to taxation in the U.S. but the tax is not expected to be subject to tax in the United States.material.


Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue


Revenue from energy business customersrecognized is recognizedequal to what the Company has the right to invoice as electricity or natural gas is delivered or services are provided.it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. The determination of customer billingsinvoices is based on a systematic reading of meters, fixed reservation charges based on contractual quantities and rates or, in the case of the Great Britain distribution businesses, when information is received from the national settlement system. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $665$828 million as of December 31, 2017.2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Unbilled revenue is reversed in the following month and billed revenue is recorded based on the subsequent meter readings.


Wildfire Loss Contingencies
Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in the Company's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, the Company is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the wildfires. In determining this exposure, the Company is required to assess whether the likelihood of loss for each of the wildfires and lawsuits is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with various parties. If deemed reasonably possible, the Company is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts. If deemed probable, the Company is required to accrue a loss if reasonably estimable based on the bottom end of the range if no amount within the range of estimated loss is any better than another amount. Many assumptions and variables are involved in determining these estimates, including identifying the various categories of potential loss such as fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. Within the categories of potential loss, further assumptions are made regarding items such as the types of structures damaged, estimated replacement values associated with those structures, value of personal property, the types of natural resource damage such as timber, the value of that timber, the nature of noneconomic damages such as those arising from personal injuries, other damages the Company may be responsible for if found negligent such as punitive damages, and the amount of any penalties or fines that may be imposed by governmental entities. Refer to Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Company's loss contingencies associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney fire.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. The Company's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates, equity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which the Company transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with the Company's business activities. Each of the Company's business platforms has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Notes 2 and 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Company's contracts accounted for as derivatives.



106


Commodity Price Risk


The Company is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk primarily through BHE's ownership of the Utilities as they have an obligation to serve retail customer load in their regulated service territories. The Company also provides nonregulated retail electricity and natural gas services in competitive markets. The Utilities' load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage and transmission and transportation constraints. The Company does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities. To mitigatemanage a portion of its commodity price risk, the Company uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. The Company does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. The Company's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates, which is subject to regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.


The table that follows summarizes the Company's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives, excluding collateral netting of $76$(88) million and $74$26 million,, respectively, as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices with the contracted or expected volumes. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions).
Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts$335 $520 $150 
Designated as hedging contracts12 40 (16)
Total commodity derivative contracts$347 $560 $134 
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts$20 $116 $(76)
Designated as hedging contracts(10)(5)(15)
Total commodity derivative contracts$10 $111 $(91)
 Fair Value - Estimated Fair Value after
 Net Asset Hypothetical Change in Price
 (Liability) 10% increase 10% decrease
As of December 31, 2017:     
Not designated as hedging contracts$(32) $(18) $(46)
Designated as hedging contracts(1) 35
 (37)
Total commodity derivative contracts$(33) $17
 $(83)
      
As of December 31, 2016     
Not designated as hedging contracts$(71) $(37) $(105)
Designated as hedging contracts(16) 19
 (51)
Total commodity derivative contracts$(87) $(18) $(156)


The settled cost of certain of the Company's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts is included in regulated rates and, therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose the Company to earnings volatility. Consolidated financial results would be negatively impacted if the costs of wholesale electricity, wholesale natural gas or fuel are higher than what is included in regulated rates, including the impacts of adjustment mechanisms. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, a net regulatory liability of $231 million and a net regulatory asset of $119$71 million, and $148 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liabilityasset of $32$335 million and $71$20 million,, respectively. The difference between the net regulatory asset and the net derivative liability relates primarily to a power purchase agreement derivative at BHE Renewables. For the Company's commodity derivative contracts designated as hedging contracts, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts, to the extent the hedge is considered effective, generally do not expose the Company to earnings volatility.



107


Interest Rate Risk


The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt, future debt issuances and mortgage commitments. The Company manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, the Company's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose the Company to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if the Company were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of the Company's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 8, 9, 10, 11, and 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of the Company's short-short and long-term debt.


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Company had short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $6.4$3.2 billion and $4.2$3.7 billion,, respectively, that expose the Company to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


The Company may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, forward sale commitments or mortgage interest rate lock commitments, to mitigate the Company's exposure to interest rate risk. Changes in fair value of agreements designated as cash flow hedges are reported in accumulated other comprehensive incomeAOCI to the extent the hedge is effective until the forecasted transaction occurs. Changes in fair value of agreements not designated as hedging contracts are recognized in earnings. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Company had variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps with notional amounts of $679$481 million and $714$533 million, respectively, and £136£272 million and £0£174 million, respectively, to protect the Company against an increase in interest rates. Additionally, as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Company had mortgage commitments, net, with notional amounts of $422$438 million and $309$1,512 million, respectively, to protect the Company against an increase in interest rates. The fair value of the Company's interest rate derivative contracts was a net derivative asset of $16$108 million and $10$16 million respectively, as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021, respectively. A hypothetical 2010 basis point increase and a 2010 basis point decrease in interest rates would not have a material impact on the Company.


The Company holds foreign currency swaps with the purpose of hedging the foreign currency exchange rate associated with Euro denominated debt. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had €250 million in aggregate notional amounts of these foreign currency swaps outstanding. A hypothetical 10% decrease in market interest rates would not have resulted in a material decrease in fair value of the Company's foreign currency swaps as of December 31.

Equity Price Risk


Market prices for equity securities are subject to fluctuation and consequently the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investee, the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions.


108


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited common stock represented approximately 81%86% and 75%92%, respectively, of the total fair value of the Company's equity securities. The majority of the Company's remaining equity securities are held in a trust related to certain trust funds in whichthe decommissioning of nuclear generation assets and the realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates. The following table summarizes the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited as of December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 and the effects of a hypothetical 30% increase and a 30% decrease in market price as of those dates. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions).
EstimatedHypothetical
HypotheticalFair Value afterPercentage Increase
FairPriceHypothetical(Decrease) in BHE
ValueChangeChange in PricesShareholders' Equity
As of December 31, 2022$3,763 30% increase$4,892 %
30% decrease2,634 (1)
As of December 31, 2021$7,693 30% increase$10,001 %
30% decrease5,385 (3)
     Estimated Hypothetical
   Hypothetical Fair Value after Percentage Increase
 Fair Price Hypothetical (Decrease) in BHE
 Value Change Change in Prices Shareholders' Equity
        
As of December 31, 2017$1,961
 30% increase $2,549
 1 %
   30% decrease 1,373
 (1)
        
As of December 31, 2016$1,185
 30% increase $1,541
 1 %
   30% decrease 830
 (1)



Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk


BHE's business operations and investments outside of the United StatesU.S. increase its risk related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates primarily in relation to the British pound and the Canadian dollar. BHE's reporting currency is the United StatesU.S. dollar, and the value of the assets and liabilities, earnings, cash flows and potential distributions from BHE's foreign operations changes with the fluctuations of the currency in which they transact.


Northern Powergrid's functional currency is the British pound. As of December 31, 2017,2022, a 10% devaluation in the British pound to the United StatesU.S. dollar would result in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet being negatively impacted by a $409$491 million cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI. A 10% devaluation in the average currency exchange rate would have resulted in lower reported earnings for Northern Powergrid of $25$39 million in 2017.2022.


AltaLink'sBHE Canada's functional currency is the Canadian dollar. As of December 31, 2017,2022, a 10% devaluation in the Canadian dollar to the United StatesU.S. dollar would result in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet being negatively impacted by a $312$387 million cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI. A 10% devaluation in the average currency exchange rate would have resulted in lower reported earnings for AltaLinkBHE Canada of $17$18 million in 2017.2022.


Credit Risk


Domestic Regulated Operations


The Utilities are exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent the Utilities' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, the Utilities analyze the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establish limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluate the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, the Utilities enter into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, the Utilities exercise rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp's aggregate credit exposure fromwith wholesale activities totaled $127 million, based on settlementenergy supply and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral. As of December 31, 2017, $125 million, or 98.5%, of PacifiCorp's credit exposure was withmarketing counterparties included counterparties having investmentnon-investment grade, internally rated credit ratings by either Moody's Investor Service or Standard & Poor's Rating Services. Asratings. Substantially all of December 31, 2017, three counterparties comprised $91 million, or 72%, of the aggregate credit exposure. The threethese non-investment grade, internally rated counterparties are rated investment grade by Moody's Investor Serviceassociated with long-duration solar and Standard & Poor's Rating Services,wind power purchase agreements, some of which are from facilities that have not yet achieved commercial operation and for which PacifiCorp ishas no obligation should the facilities not aware of any factors that would likely result in a downgrade of the counterparties' credit ratings to below investment grade over the remaining term of transactions outstanding as of December 31, 2017.achieve commercial operation.


109


Substantially all of MidAmerican Energy's electric wholesale sales revenue results from participation in RTOs, including the MISO and the PJM. MidAmerican Energy's share of historical losses from defaults by other RTO market participants has not been material. Additionally, as of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy's aggregate direct credit exposure from electric wholesale marketing counterparties was not material.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, NV Energy's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral, was not material.


BHE GT&S primary customers include electric and natural gas distribution utilities and LNG export, import and storage customers. Northern Natural Gas' primary customers include utilities in the upper Midwest. Kern River's primary customers are electric and natural gas distribution utilities, major oil and natural gas companies or affiliates of such companies, electric generating companies, energy marketing and trading companies and financial institutions. As a general policy, collateral is not required for receivables from creditworthy customers. Customers' financial condition and creditworthiness, as defined by the tariff, are regularly evaluated and historical losses have been minimal. In order to provide protection against credit risk, and as permitted by the separate terms of each of BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas' and Kern River's tariffs, the companies have required customers that lack creditworthiness to provide cash deposits, letters of credit or other security until they meet the creditworthiness requirements of the respective tariff.



Northern Powergrid


The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies charge fees for the use of their distribution systems to supply companies. The supply companies purchase electricity from generators and traders, sell the electricity to end-use customers and use the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution networks pursuant to the multilateral "Distribution Connection and Use of System Agreement." The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' customers are concentrated in a small number of electricity supply businesses. During 2017, RWE Npower PLC2022, E.ON and certain of its affiliates and British Gas Trading Limited represented approximately 21%22% and 15%14%, respectively, of the total combined distribution revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies. The industry operates in accordance with a framework which sets credit limits for each supply business based on its credit rating or payment history and requires them to provide credit cover if their value at risk (measured as being equivalent to 45 days usage) exceeds the credit limit. Acceptable credit typically is provided in the form of a parent company guarantee, letter of credit or an escrow account. Ofgem has indicated that, provided the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies have implemented credit control, billing and collection in line with best practice guidelines and can demonstrate compliance with the guidelines or are able to satisfactorily explain departure from the guidelines, any bad debt losses arising from supplier default will be recovered through an increase in future allowed income. Losses incurred to date have not been material.


AltaLinkBHE Canada


AltaLink's primary source of operating revenue is the AESO, an entity rated AA- by Standard and Poor's. Because of the dependence on a single customer, any material failure of the customer to fulfill its obligations would significantly impair AltaLink's ability to meet its existing and future obligations. Total operating revenue for AltaLink was $699$681 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.


BHE Renewables


BHE Renewables owns independent power projects in the United States and the Philippines that generally have separate project financing agreements. These projects source of operating revenue is derived primarily from long-term power purchase agreements with single customers, primarily utilities, which expire between 20172023 and 2040.2043. Because of the dependence generally from a single customer at each project, any material failure of the customer to fulfill its obligations would significantly impair that project's ability to meet its existing and future obligations. Total operating revenue for BHE Renewables was $838$994 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.


Other Energy Business
110



MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC ("MES") is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supplyItem 8.Financial Statements and marketing activities with financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent that MES' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, MES analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, MES enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, MES exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.Supplementary Data

As of December 31, 2017, MES' aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral, was not material.


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data




111


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company
Des Moines, Iowa


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and2022, the related notes and the schedulesschedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(ii)(2) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matters



The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP



Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 7 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company is subject to rate regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as well as certain other regulatory commissions (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the electric and natural gas rates of the Company's regulated businesses in the respective service territories where the Company operates. Management has determined its regulated operations meet the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.
112


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow the Company an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While the Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit the Company's ability to recover their costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, and (3) refunds to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the future outcome of decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated the Company's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.

Wildfires — Contingencies — See Note 16 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in the Company's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, the Company is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire (the "Wildfires"). In determining this exposure, the Company is required to determine whether the likelihood of loss for each of the Wildfires is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the Wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with claimants.

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If deemed reasonably possible, the Company is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts.

Management has recorded estimated liabilities of $424 million and receivables of $246 million, which represent its best estimate of probable losses and expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized probable losses, net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively. Management has disclosed reasonably possible estimated losses of $31 million, net of potential insurance recoveries of $103 million, associated with the 2022 McKinney Fire.

113


We identified wildfire-related contingencies and the related disclosures as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to determine the probability of loss and estimate the probable or reasonably possible losses and insurance recoveries. This required the application of a high degree of judgment and extensive effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's judgments, estimates and disclosures related to wildfire-related loss contingencies.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management's judgments regarding the probability of loss, estimated losses and insurance recoveries, and related disclosures for wildfire-related contingencies included the following, among others:
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether a loss was probable or reasonably possible for the Wildfires by inquiring of management and the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding the likelihood and amounts of probable and reasonably possible losses, including the potential impact of information gained through investigations into the cause of the fires, information from claimants, the advice of legal counsel, and reading external information for any evidence that might contradict management's assertions.
We evaluated the estimation methodology for determining the amount of probable and reasonably possible losses through inquiries with management and external and internal legal counsel and we tested the significant assumptions used in the estimates of probable and reasonably possible losses.
We read legal letters from the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding known information and evaluated whether the information therein was consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether related insurance recoveries were probable of collection by inquiring of management and the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding the amounts of insurance recoveries recorded or disclosed. With the assistance of our insurance specialists, we tested the significant assumptions used in the determination of collectability, including obtaining and reading related policies to determine whether the types of insurance claims are included or excluded from coverage.
We evaluated whether the Company's disclosures were appropriate and consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
February 23, 201824, 2023


We have served as the Company's auditor since 1991.





114


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$1,591 $1,096 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents2,141 172 
Trade receivables, net2,876 2,468 
Inventories1,256 1,122 
Mortgage loans held for sale474 1,263 
Regulatory assets1,319 544 
Other current assets1,345 1,583 
Total current assets11,002 8,248 
  
Property, plant and equipment, net93,043 89,816 
Goodwill11,489 11,650 
Regulatory assets3,743 3,419 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments11,273 15,788 
Other assets3,290 3,144 
  
Total assets$133,840 $132,065 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$935
 $721
Restricted cash and short-term investments327
 211
Trade receivables, net2,014
 1,751
Income taxes receivable334
 
Inventories888
 925
Mortgage loans held for sale465
 359
Other current assets815
 706
Total current assets5,778
 4,673
    
Property, plant and equipment, net65,871
 62,509
Goodwill9,678
 9,010
Regulatory assets2,761
 4,307
Investments and restricted cash and investments4,872
 3,945
Other assets1,248
 996
    
Total assets$90,208
 $85,440


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

115


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$2,679 $2,136 
Accrued interest558 537 
Accrued property, income and other taxes746 606 
Accrued employee expenses333 372 
Short-term debt1,119 2,009 
Current portion of long-term debt3,201 1,265 
Other current liabilities1,677 1,837 
Total current liabilities10,313 8,762 
  
BHE senior debt13,096 13,003 
BHE junior subordinated debentures100 100 
Subsidiary debt35,238 35,394 
Regulatory liabilities7,070 6,960 
Deferred income taxes12,678 12,938 
Other long-term liabilities4,706 4,319 
Total liabilities83,201 81,476 
  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
  
Equity:  
BHE shareholders' equity:  
Preferred stock - 100 shares authorized, $0.01 par value, 1 and 2 shares issued and outstanding850 1,650 
Common stock - 115 shares authorized, no par value, 76 shares issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital6,298 6,374 
Long-term income tax receivable— (744)
Retained earnings41,833 40,754 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(2,149)(1,340)
Total BHE shareholders' equity46,832 46,694 
Noncontrolling interests3,807 3,895 
Total equity50,639 50,589 
  
Total liabilities and equity$133,840 $132,065 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$1,519
 $1,317
Accrued interest488
 454
Accrued property, income and other taxes354
 389
Accrued employee expenses274
 261
Short-term debt4,488
 1,869
Current portion of long-term debt3,431
 1,006
Other current liabilities1,049
 1,017
Total current liabilities11,603
 6,313
    
BHE senior debt5,452
 7,418
BHE junior subordinated debentures100
 944
Subsidiary debt26,210
 26,748
Regulatory liabilities7,309
 2,933
Deferred income taxes8,242
 13,879
Other long-term liabilities2,984
 2,742
Total liabilities61,900
 60,977
    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
 
    
Equity:   
BHE shareholders' equity:   
Common stock - 115 shares authorized, no par value, 77 shares issued and outstanding
 
Additional paid-in capital6,368
 6,390
Retained earnings22,206
 19,448
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(398) (1,511)
Total BHE shareholders' equity28,176
 24,327
Noncontrolling interests132
 136
Total equity28,308
 24,463
    
Total liabilities and equity$90,208
 $85,440


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

116


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Energy$21,069 $18,935 $15,556 
Real estate5,268 6,215 5,396 
Total operating revenue26,337 25,150 20,952 
 
Operating expenses: 
Energy: 
Cost of sales6,757 5,504 4,187 
Operations and maintenance4,217 3,991 3,545 
Depreciation and amortization4,230 3,829 3,410 
Property and other taxes775 789 634 
Real estate5,117 5,710 4,885 
Total operating expenses21,096 19,823 16,661 
  
Operating income5,241 5,327 4,291 
 
Other income (expense): 
Interest expense(2,216)(2,118)(2,021)
Capitalized interest76 64 80 
Allowance for equity funds167 126 165 
Interest and dividend income154 89 71 
(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net(2,002)1,823 4,797 
Other, net(7)(17)88 
Total other income (expense)(3,828)(33)3,180 
  
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss1,413 5,294 7,471 
Income tax (benefit) expense(1,916)(1,132)308 
Equity loss(185)(237)(149)
Net income3,144 6,189 7,014 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests423 399 71 
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders2,721 5,790 6,943 
Preferred dividends46 121 26 
Earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $6,917 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:     
Energy$15,171
 $14,621
 $15,354
Real estate3,443
 2,801
 2,526
Total operating revenue18,614
 17,422
 17,880
      
Operating costs and expenses:     
Energy:     
Cost of sales4,518
 4,315
 5,079
Operating expense3,773
 3,707
 3,732
Depreciation and amortization2,580
 2,560
 2,399
Real estate3,229
 2,589
 2,342
Total operating costs and expenses14,100
 13,171
 13,552
    
  
Operating income4,514
 4,251
 4,328
      
Other income (expense):     
Interest expense(1,841) (1,854) (1,904)
Capitalized interest45
 139
 74
Allowance for equity funds76
 158
 91
Interest and dividend income111
 120
 107
Other, net(398) 36
 39
Total other income (expense)(2,007) (1,401) (1,593)
      
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity (loss) income2,507
 2,850
 2,735
Income tax (benefit) expense(554) 403
 450
Equity (loss) income(151) 123
 115
Net income2,910
 2,570
 2,400
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests40
 28
 30
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders$2,870
 $2,542
 $2,370


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



117


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income$3,144 $6,189 $7,014 
 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $(23), $55 and $(19)(72)174 (65)
Foreign currency translation adjustment(810)(24)234 
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $20, $10 and $(3)76 67 (15)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(806)217 154 
    
Comprehensive income2,338 6,406 7,168 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests426 404 71 
Comprehensive income attributable to BHE shareholders$1,912 $6,002 $7,097 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net income$2,910
 $2,570
 $2,400
      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of
$9, $11 and $17
64
 (9) 52
Foreign currency translation adjustment546
 (583) (680)
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of
 $270, $(19) and $129
500
 (30) 225
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax of
 $(7), $13 and $(7)
3
 19
 (11)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax1,113
 (603) (414)
      
Comprehensive income4,023
 1,967
 1,986
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests40
 28
 30
Comprehensive income attributable to BHE shareholders$3,983
 $1,939
 $1,956


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



118


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)

BHE Shareholders' Equity
Long-termAccumulated
AdditionalIncomeOther
PreferredCommonPaid-inTaxRetainedComprehensiveNoncontrollingTotal
StockStockCapitalReceivableEarningsLoss, NetInterestsEquity
Balance, December 31, 2019$— $— $6,389 $(530)$28,296 $(1,706)$129 $32,578 
Net income— — — — 6,943 — 70 7,013 
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 154 — 154 
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — (128)— — — (128)
Issuance of preferred stock3,750 — — — — — — 3,750 
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (26)— — (26)
Common stock purchases— (6)— (120)— — (126)
Distributions— — — — — — (121)(121)
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — (5)— — — (28)(33)
BHE GT&S acquisition -
   noncontrolling interest
— — — — — — 3,916 3,916 
Other equity transactions— — (1)— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20203,750 — 6,377 (658)35,093 (1,552)3,967 46,977 
Net income— — — — 5,790 — 397 6,187 
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 212 217 
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — (86)(8)— — (94)
Preferred stock redemptions(2,100)— — — — — — (2,100)
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (121)— — (121)
Distributions— — — — — (478)(478)
Contributions— — — — — — 
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — (3)— — — (4)(7)
Other equity transactions— — — — — — (1)(1)
Balance, December 31, 20211,650 — 6,374 (744)40,754 (1,340)3,895 50,589 
Net income— — — — 2,721 — 421 3,142 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — — — — (809)(806)
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — 744 (791)— — (47)
Preferred stock redemptions(800)— — — — — — (800)
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (46)— — (46)
Common stock purchases— — (77)— (793)— — (870)
Distributions— — — — — (522)(522)
Contributions— — — — — — 
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — — — — — 
Other equity transactions— — — (12)— (1)(12)
Balance, December 31, 2022$850 $— $6,298 $— $41,833 $(2,149)$3,807 $50,639 
 BHE Shareholders' Equity    
         Accumulated    
     Additional   Other    
 Common Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Noncontrolling Total
 Shares Stock Capital Earnings Loss, Net Interests Equity
              
Balance, December 31, 201477
 $
 $6,423
 $14,513
 $(494) $131
 $20,573
Adoption of ASC 853
 
 
 56
 
 11
 67
Net income
 
 
 2,370
 
 18
 2,388
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (414) 
 (414)
Distributions
 
 
 
 
 (21) (21)
Common stock purchases
 
 (3) (33) 
 
 (36)
Other equity transactions
 
 (17) 
 
 (5) (22)
Balance, December 31, 201577
 
 6,403
 16,906
 (908) 134
 22,535
Net income
 
 
 2,542
 
 14
 2,556
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (603) 
 (603)
Distributions
 
 
 
 
 (20) (20)
Other equity transactions
 
 (13) 
 
 8
 (5)
Balance, December 31, 201677
 
 6,390
 19,448
 (1,511) 136
 24,463
Net income
 
 
 2,870
 
 22
 2,892
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 1,113
 
 1,113
Distributions
 
 
 
 
 (22) (22)
Common stock purchases
 
 (1) (18) 
 
 (19)
Common stock exchange
 
 (6) (94) 
 
 (100)
Other equity transactions
 
 (15) 
 
 (4) (19)
Balance, December 31, 201777
 $
 $6,368
 $22,206
 $(398) $132
 $28,308


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



119


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$2,910
 $2,570
 $2,400
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Loss (gain) on other items, net455
 62
 (8)
Depreciation and amortization2,646
 2,591
 2,428
Allowance for equity funds(76) (158) (91)
Equity loss (income), net of distributions260
 (67) (38)
Changes in regulatory assets and liabilities31
 (34) 356
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits19
 1,090
 1,265
Other, net(2) (142) 19
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:     
Trade receivables and other assets(86) (158) (9)
Derivative collateral, net(22) 32
 (14)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(91) (79) (11)
Accrued property, income and other taxes(28) 377
 877
Accounts payable and other liabilities50
 (28) (194)
Net cash flows from operating activities6,066
 6,056
 6,980
      
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Capital expenditures(4,571) (5,090) (5,875)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(1,113) (66) (164)
Increase in restricted cash and investments(81) (36) (28)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities(190) (141) (144)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities202
 191
 142
Equity method investments(368) (570) (202)
Other, net(12) (34) 41
Net cash flows from investing activities(6,133) (5,746) (6,230)
      
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Repayments of BHE senior debt and junior subordinated debentures(2,323) (2,000) (850)
Common stock purchases(19) 
 (36)
Proceeds from subsidiary debt1,763
 2,327
 2,479
Repayments of subsidiary debt(1,000) (1,831) (1,354)
Net proceeds from (repayments of) short-term debt2,361
 879
 (421)
Tender offer premium paid(435) 
 
Other, net(73) (65) (73)
Net cash flows from financing activities274
 (690) (255)
      
Effect of exchange rate changes7
 (7) (4)
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents214
 (387) 491
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period721
 1,108
 617
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$935
 $721
 $1,108

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$3,144 $6,189 $7,014 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Losses (gains) on marketable securities, net2,002 (1,823)(4,797)
Depreciation and amortization4,286 3,881 3,455 
Allowance for equity funds(167)(126)(165)
Equity loss, net of distributions319 380 248 
Net power cost deferrals(1,290)(520)(62)
Amortization of net power cost deferrals357 107 (5)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(146)(255)(348)
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net(467)646 1,880 
Other, net59 (57)(23)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Trade receivables and other assets20 553 (1,318)
Derivative collateral, net121 82 43 
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(27)(39)(65)
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net397 (489)(134)
Accounts payable and other liabilities751 163 501 
Net cash flows from operating activities9,359 8,692 6,224 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(7,505)(6,611)(6,765)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(314)(122)(2,397)
Purchases of marketable securities(574)(297)(370)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities2,464 273 325 
Purchases of other investments(1,958)(20)(1,323)
Proceeds from other investments1,300 13 
Equity method investments119 (212)(2,724)
Other, net12 (74)76 
Net cash flows from investing activities(7,750)(5,763)(13,165)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock— — 3,750 
Preferred stock redemptions(800)(2,100)— 
Preferred dividends(50)(132)(7)
Common stock purchases(870)— (126)
Proceeds from BHE senior debt986 — 5,212 
Repayments of BHE senior debt— (450)(350)
Proceeds from subsidiary debt2,887 2,409 2,688 
Repayments of subsidiary debt(1,494)(2,024)(2,841)
Net repayments of short-term debt(867)(276)(939)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(524)(488)(122)
Other, net(274)(70)(162)
Net cash flows from financing activities(1,006)(3,131)7,103 
Effect of exchange rate changes(30)15 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents573 (201)177 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1,244 1,445 1,268 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,817 $1,244 $1,445 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

120


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(1)
Organization and Operations

(1)Organization and Operations

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE") is a holding company that owns a highly diversified portfolio of locally managed and operated businesses principally engaged in the energy industry (collectively with its subsidiaries, the "Company") and is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").


The Company's operations are organized as eight business segments: PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries ("PacifiCorp"), MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries ("MidAmerican Funding") (which primarily consists of MidAmerican Energy Company ("MidAmerican Energy")), NV Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("NV Energy") (which primarily consists of Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") and Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific")), Northern Powergrid Holdings Company and its subsidiaries ("Northern Powergrid") (which primarily consists of Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limitedplc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc), BHE Pipeline Group, LLC and its subsidiaries (which primarily consists of BHE GT&S, LLC and its subsidiaries ("BHE GT&S"), Northern Natural Gas Company ("Northern Natural Gas") and Kern River Gas Transmission Company ("Kern River")), BHE Transmission (which consists of BHE Canada Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries ("AltaLink"BHE Canada") (which primarily consists of AltaLink, L.P. ("ALP"AltaLink")) and BHE U.S. Transmission, LLC)LLC and its subsidiaries), BHE Renewables, LLC and its subsidiaries ("BHE Renewables") and HomeServices of America, Inc. (collectively withand its subsidiaries "HomeServices"("HomeServices"). The Company, through these locally managed and operated businesses, owns four utility companies in the United StatesU.S. serving customers in 11 states, two electricity distribution companies in Great Britain, twofive interstate natural gas pipeline companies and interests in a liquefied natural gas ("LNG") export, import and storage facility in the United States,U.S., an electric transmission business in Canada, interests in electric transmission businesses in the United States,U.S., a renewable energy business primarily investing in wind, solar, wind, geothermal and hydroelectric projects, the second largest residential real estate brokerage firm in the United StatesU.S. and one of the largest residential real estate brokerage franchise networks in the United States.U.S.


(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Consolidation and Presentation


The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of BHE and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. The Consolidated Statements of Operations include the revenue and expenses of any acquired entities from the date of acquisition. The Company consolidates variable interest entities ("VIE") in which it possesses both (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.


Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements


The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; impairment of goodwill; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.


121


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific, BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas, Kern River and ALPAltaLink (the "Regulated Businesses") prepare their financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, the Regulated Businesses defer the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.


The Company continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit the Regulated Businesses' ability to recover their costs. The Company believes the application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at the federal, state and provincial levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").


Fair Value Measurements


As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Alternative valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered inwhen determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and InvestmentsCash Equivalents


Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, United StatesU.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted amounts are included in other current assetscash and investmentscash equivalents consist substantially of funds restricted for debt service obligations for certain of the Company's nonregulated renewable energy projects. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and investmentscash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets (in millions):


As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$1,591 $1,096 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents173 127 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments53 21 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$1,817 $1,244 

Investments


Fixed Maturity Securities

The Company's management determines the appropriate classification of investments in debt and equityfixed maturity securities at the acquisition date and reevaluates the classification at each balance sheet date. Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments that management does not intend to use or is restricted from using in current operations are presented as noncurrent on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


Available-for-sale securitiesinvestments are carried at fair value with realized gains and losses, as determined on a specific identification basis, recognized in earnings and unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI, net of tax. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates. Trading securitiesinvestments are carried at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losseschanges in fair value recognized in earnings. Held-to-maturity securitiesinvestments are carried at amortized cost, reflecting the ability and intent to hold the securities to maturity.

The Company utilizesdifference between the equity method of accounting with respect to investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when an investor possesses more than 20% of the voting interests of the investee. This presumption may be overcome based on specific facts and circumstances that demonstrate the ability to exercise significant influence is restricted. In applying the equity method, the Company records the investment atoriginal cost and subsequently increases or decreases the carryingmaturity value of a fixed maturity security is amortized to earnings using the investment by the Company's share of the net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI") of the investee. The Company records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment. Certain equity investments are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of related investment tax credits.interest method.

122




InvestmentsInvestment gains and losses arise when investments are sold (as determined on a specific identification basis) or are other-than-temporarily impaired.impaired with respect to securities classified as available-for-sale. If a decline inthe value of ana fixed maturity investment declines to below amortized cost and the decline is deemed other than temporary, the amortized cost of the investment is written downreduced to fair value, with a corresponding charge to earnings. Factors considered in judging whether an impairment is other than temporary include: the financial condition, business prospects and creditworthiness of the issuer; the relative amount of the decline; the Company's ability and intent to hold the investment until the fair value recovers; and the length of time that fair value has been less than cost. Impairment losses on equity securities are charged to earnings. With respect to an investment in a debt security, anyAny resulting impairment loss is recognized in earnings if the Company intends to sell, or expects to be required to sell, the debt security before its amortized cost is recovered. If the Company does not expect to ultimately recover the amortized cost basis even if it does not intend to sell the security, the credit loss component is recognized in earnings and any difference between fair value and the amortized cost basis, net of the credit loss, is reflected in OCI.other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI"). For regulated fixed maturity investments, any impairment charge is offset by the establishment of a regulatory asset to the extent recovery in regulated rates is probable.


Equity Securities

Investments in equity securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as a component of gains (losses) on marketable securities, net. All changes in fair value of equity securities in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates.

Equity Method Investments

The Company utilizes the equity method of accounting with respect to investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when the investor possesses more than 20% of the voting interests of the investee. This presumption may be overcome based on specific facts and circumstances that demonstrate that the ability to exercise significant influence is restricted. In applying the equity method, the Company records the investment at cost and subsequently increases or decreases the carrying value of the investment by the Company's share of the net earnings or losses and OCI of the investee. The Company records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment. Certain equity investments are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of related investment tax credits.

Allowance for Doubtful AccountsCredit Losses


Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts.credit losses. The allowance for doubtful accountscredit losses is based on the Company's assessment of the collectibilitycollectability of amounts owed to the Company by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,In measuring the allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $40 millioncredit losses for trade receivables, the Company primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, the Company may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and $33 million, respectively,reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. The change in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$108 $77 $44 
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net43 81 56 
Acquisitions— — 
Write-offs, net(45)(50)(28)
Ending balance$106 $108 $77 

Derivatives


The Company employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price, interest rate, and foreign currency exchange rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements. Cash collateral received from or paid to counterparties to secure derivative contract assets or liabilities in excess of amounts offset is included in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


123


Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked-to-market and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


For the Company's derivatives not designated as hedging contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For the Company's derivatives not designated as hedging contracts and for which changes in fair value are not recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as operating revenue for sales contracts; cost of sales and operating expense for purchase contracts and electricity, natural gas and fuel swap contracts; and other, net for interest rate swap derivatives.


For the Company's derivatives designated as hedging contracts, the Company formally assesses, at inception and thereafter, whether the hedging contract is highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged item. The Company formally documents hedging activity by transaction type and risk management strategy.


Changes in the estimated fair value of a derivative contract designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge, to the extent effective, are included on the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity as AOCI, net of tax, until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it has determined that a derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, or when it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur. When hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, future changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative contract are charged to earnings. Gains and losses related to discontinued hedges that were previously recorded in AOCI will remain in AOCI until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings, unless it becomes probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur at which time associated deferred amounts in AOCI are immediately recognized in earnings.



Inventories


Inventories consist mainly of fuel, which includes coal stocks, stored gas and fuel oil, totaling $352$248 million and $402$296 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, and materials and supplies totaling $536$1,008 million and $523$826 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The cost of materials and supplies, coal stocks and fuel oil is determined primarily using the average cost method. The cost of stored gas is determined using either the last-in-first-out ("LIFO") method or the lower of average cost or market. With respect to inventories carried at LIFO cost, the replacement cost would be $22$22 million and $27$27 million higher as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.


Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


General


Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. The Company capitalizes all construction-related material,materials, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include capitalized interest, including debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable to the Regulated Businesses. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has regulatory arrangements in Iowa in which the carrying cost of certain utility plant has been reduced for amounts associated with electric returns on equity exceeding specified thresholds.

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by the Company's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by the Regulated Businesses to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.


124


Generally when the Company retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings.


Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, is capitalized by the Regulated Businesses as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") and the Alberta Utilities Commission ("AUC"). After construction is completed, the Company is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.


Asset Retirement Obligations


The Company recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. The Company's AROs are primarily related to the decommissioning of nuclear generating facilities and obligations associated with its other generating facilities and offshore natural gas pipelines. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. For the Regulated Businesses, the difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.



Impairment


The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. TheAs a majority of all property, plant and equipment is used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.


Leases

The Company has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office space, office equipment, generating facilities, land and rail cars and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities and vehicles. These leases generally require the Company to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. The Company does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating the Company is reasonably certain to exercise the option. The Company's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

The Company's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

The Company's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

125


Goodwill


Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31.31, 2022. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company estimates the fair value of theits reporting unit.units. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the estimated fair value, then the identifiable assets, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities of the reporting unit are estimated at fair value as of the current testing date. The excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit over the current estimated fair value of net assets establishes the implied value of goodwill. The excess of the recorded goodwill over the implied goodwill value is charged to earnings as an impairment loss. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. The Company uses a variety of methods to estimate a reporting unit's fair value, principally discounted projected future net cash flows. Key assumptions used include, but are not limited to, the use of estimated future cash flows; multiples of earnings; and an appropriate discount rate. In estimating future cash flows, the Company incorporates current market information, as well as historical factors. As such, the determination of fair value incorporates significant unobservable inputs. During 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, the Company did not record any material goodwill impairments.


The Company records goodwill adjustments for (a) the tax benefit associated with the excess of tax-deductible goodwill over the reported amount of goodwill and (b) changes to the purchase price allocation prior to the end of the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date.


Revenue Recognition


    Customer Revenue

The Company uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the event one of the parties to a contract has performed before the other, the Company would recognize a contract asset or contract liability depending on the relationship between the Company's performance and the customer's payment.

Energy BusinessesProducts and Services


RevenueA majority of the Company's energy revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, business customers is recognized as electricity ortransmission, distribution and natural gas and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. The Company's energy revenue that is nonregulated primarily relates to the Company's renewable energy business.

Revenue recognized is equal to what the Company has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, unbilled revenue was $665 million and $643 million, respectively, and is included in2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $828 million and $718 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy businessesproducts and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements.arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued.

        Real Estate Services

The Company records sales,Company's HomeServices reportable segment consists of separate brokerage, mortgage and franchise businesses. Rates charged for brokerage, mortgage and excise taxes collected directly from customersfranchise real estate services are established through contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price and remitted directlythe allocation of the price amongst the separate performance obligations.

The full-service residential real estate brokerage business has performance obligations to deliver integrated real estate services including brokerage services, title and closing services, property and casualty insurance, home warranties, relocation services, and other home-related services to customers. All performance obligations related to the taxing authorities onfull-service residential real estate brokerage business are satisfied in less than one year at the point in time when a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Real Estate Commission Revenue, Mortgage Revenue and Franchise Royalty Fees

real estate transaction is closed or when services are provided. Commission revenue from real estate brokerage transactions and related amounts due to agents are recognized when a real estate transaction is closed. Title and escrow closing fee revenue from real estate transactions and related amounts due to the title insurer are recognized at closing. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer at closing.

126


The franchise business operates a network that has performance obligations to provide the right to use certain brand names and other related service marks as well as to provide orientation programs, training and consultation services, advertising programs and other services to its franchisees. The performance obligations related to the franchise business are satisfied over time or when the services are provided. Franchise royalty fees are sales-based variable consideration and are based on a percentage of commissions earned by franchisees on real estate sales, which are recognized when the sale closes. Meetings and training revenue, referral fees, late fees, service fees and franchise termination fees are earned when services have been completed. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the franchisee within 30 days of billing.

    Other Revenue

Energy Products and Services

Other revenue consists primarily of revenue related to power purchase agreements not considered Customer Revenue as they are recognized in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" and ASC 842, "Leases" and certain non-tariff-based revenue approved by the regulator that is not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers."

        Real Estate Service

Mortgage and other revenue consists primarily of revenue related to the mortgage business. Mortgage fee revenue consists of amounts earned related to application and underwriting fees and fees on canceled loans. Fees associated with the origination and acquisition of mortgage loans are recognized as earned. Franchise royalty feesThese amounts are based on a percentage of commissions earned by franchisees on real estate sales andnot considered Customer Revenue as they are recognized when the sale closes.in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging," ASC 825, "Financial Instruments" and ASC 860, "Transfers and Servicing."


Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Debt Issuance Costs


Premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.



Foreign CurrencyAltaLink


AltaLink is regulated by the AUC, pursuant to the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), the Public Utilities Act (Alberta), the Alberta Utilities Commission Act (Alberta) and the Hydro and Electric Energy Act (Alberta). The AUC is an independent, quasi-judicial agency established by the province of Alberta, Canada, which is responsible for, among other things, approving the tariffs of transmission facility owners, including AltaLink, and distribution utilities, acquisitions of such transmission facility owners or utilities, and construction and operation of new transmission projects in Alberta. The AUC also investigates and rules on regulated rate disputes and system access problems. The AUC regulates and oversees Alberta's electricity transmission sector with broad authority that may impact many of AltaLink's activities, including its tariffs, rates, construction, operations and financing.

48


The accountsAUC has various core functions in regulating the Alberta electricity transmission sector, including the following:
regulating and adjudicating issues related to the operation of foreign-based subsidiarieselectric utilities within Alberta;
processing and approving general tariff applications relating to revenue requirements, capital expenditure prudency and rates of return including deemed capital structure for regulated utilities while ensuring that utility rates are measured in most instances using the local currencyjust and reasonable, and approval of the subsidiarytransmission tariff rates of regulated transmission providers paid by the AESO, which is the independent transmission system operator in Alberta, Canada that controls the operation of AltaLink's transmission system;
approving the need for new electricity transmission facilities and permits to build and licenses to operate electricity transmission facilities;
reviewing operations and accounts from electric utilities and conducting on-site inspections to ensure compliance with industry regulation and standards;
adjudicating enforcement issues including the imposition of administrative penalties that arise when market participants violate the rules of the AESO; and
collecting, storing, analyzing, appraising and disseminating information to effectively fulfill its duties as an industry regulator.

In addition, AUC approval is required in connection with new energy and regulated utility initiatives in Alberta, amendments to existing approvals and financing proposals by designated utilities.

AltaLink's tariffs are regulated by the AUC under the provisions of the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) in respect of rates and terms and conditions of service. The Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) and related regulations require the AUC to consider that it is in the public interest to provide consumers the benefit of unconstrained transmission access to competitive generation and the wholesale electricity market. In regulating transmission tariffs, the AUC must facilitate sufficient investment to ensure the timely upgrade, enhancement or expansion of transmission facilities, and foster a stable investment climate and a continued stream of capital investment for the transmission system.

Under the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), AltaLink prepares and files applications with the AUC for approval of tariffs to be paid by the AESO for the use of its transmission facilities, and the terms and conditions governing the use of those facilities. The AUC reviews and approves such tariff applications based on a cost-of-service regulatory model under a forward test year basis. Under this model, the AUC provides AltaLink with a reasonable opportunity to (i) earn a fair return on equity; and (ii) recover its forecast costs, including operating expenses, depreciation, borrowing costs and taxes (including deemed income taxes) associated with its regulated transmission business. The AUC must approve tariffs that are just, reasonable and not unduly preferential, arbitrary or unjustly discriminatory. AltaLink's transmission tariffs are not dependent on the price or volume of electricity transported through its transmission system.

The AESO is an independent system operator in Alberta, Canada that oversees the Alberta Interconnected Electric System ("AIES") and wholesale electricity market. The AESO is responsible for directing the safe, reliable and economic operation of the AIES, including long-term transmission system planning. AltaLink and the other transmission facility owners receive substantially all of their transmission tariff revenues from the AESO. The AESO, in turn, charges wholesale tariffs, approved by the AUC, in a manner that promotes fair and open access to the AIES and facilitates a competitive market for the purchase and sale of electricity. The AESO monitors compliance with approved reliability standards, which are enforced by the Market Surveillance Administrator, which may impose penalties on transmission facility owners for non-compliance with the approved reliability standards.

The AESO determines the need and plans for the expansion and enhancement of the transmission system in Alberta in accordance with applicable law and reliability standards. The AESO's responsibilities include long-term transmission planning and management, including assessing the current and future transmission system capacity needs of market participants. When the AESO determines an expansion or enhancement of the transmission system is needed, with limited exceptions, it submits an application to the AUC for approval of the proposed expansion or enhancement. The AESO then determines which transmission provider should submit an application to the AUC for a permit and license to construct and operate the designated transmission facilities. Generally, the transmission provider operating in the geographic area where the transmission facilities expansion or enhancement is to be located is selected by the AESO to build, own and operate the transmission facilities. In addition, Alberta law provides that certain transmission projects may be subject to a competitive process open to qualified bidders.

49


Independent Power Projects

The Yuma, Cordova, Saranac, Power Resources, Topaz, Agua Caliente, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Bishop Hill II, Jumbo Road, Marshall, Grande Prairie, Walnut Ridge, Pinyon Pines I, Pinyon Pines II, Santa Rita, Independence, Fluvanna II, Flat Top, Mariah del Norte, Alamo 6 and Pearl independent power projects are Exempt Wholesale Generators ("EWG") under the Energy Policy Act, while the Community Solar Gardens, Imperial Valley and Wailuku independent power projects are currently certified as Qualifying Facilities ("QF") under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. Both EWGs and QFs generally are exempt from compliance with extensive federal and state regulations that control the financial structure of an electric generating plant and the prices and terms at which electricity may be sold by the facilities.

The Yuma, Cordova, Saranac, Imperial Valley, Topaz, Agua Caliente, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Bishop Hill II, Marshall, Grande Prairie, Walnut Ridge, Independence, Pinyon Pines I and Pinyon Pines II independent power projects have obtained authority from the FERC to sell their power at market-based rates. This authority to sell electricity in wholesale electricity markets at market-based rates is subject to triennial reviews conducted by the FERC. Accordingly, the respective independent power projects are required to submit triennial filings to the FERC that demonstrate a lack of market power over sales of wholesale electricity and electric generation capacity in their respective market areas. The Pinyon Pines I, Pinyon Pines II, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Topaz and Yuma independent power projects and power marketers CalEnergy, LLC and BHER Market Operations, LLC file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Southwest Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Southwest Region was made in June 2022 and is awaiting FERC action. The Cordova and Saranac independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together with MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Northeast Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Northeast Region was made in June 2020 and an order accepting it was issued in December 2020. The Bishop Hill II and Walnut Ridge independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together with MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Central Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Central Region was made in December 2020 and an order accepting it was issued in March 2021. The Marshall and Grande Prairie independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together for market power study purposes in the FERC-defined Southwest Power Pool Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Southwest Power Pool Region was made in December 2021, was supplemented in July 2022 and an order accepting it was issued in January 2023. Power marketers CalEnergy LLC and BHER Market Operations, LLC also file for market power study purposes in the FERC-defined Northwest Region together with PacifiCorp, Nevada Power Company, Sierra Power Company and certain affiliates. The most recent triennial filing for the Northwest Region was made in June 2022, and is awaiting FERC action.

The entire output of Jumbo Road, Santa Rita, Fluvanna II, Flat Top, Mariah del Norte, Alamo 6, Pearl and Power Resources is within the ERCOT and market-based authority is not required for such sales solely within ERCOT as the functional currency. RevenueERCOT market is not a FERC-jurisdictional market. Similarly, Wailuku sells its output solely to the Hawaii Electric Light Company within the Hawaii electric grid, which is not a FERC-jurisdictional market and expensestherefore, Wailuku does not require market-based rate authority.

EWGs are permitted to sell capacity and electricity only in the wholesale markets, not to end users. Additionally, utilities are required to purchase electricity produced by QFs at a price that does not exceed the purchasing utility's "avoided cost" and to sell back-up power to the QFs on a non-discriminatory basis, unless they have successfully petitioned the FERC for an exemption from this purchase requirement. Avoided cost is defined generally as the price at which the utility could purchase or produce the same amount of these businesses are translated into United States dollars at the average exchange rate for the period. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the end of the reporting period. Gains or lossespower from translating the financial statements of foreign-based operations are included in equity as a component of AOCI. Gains or losses arising from transactions denominated in a currencysources other than the functional currencyQF on a long-term basis. The Energy Policy Act eliminated the purchase requirement for utilities with respect to new contracts under certain conditions. New QF contracts are also subject to FERC rate filing requirements, unlike QF contracts entered into prior to the Energy Policy Act. FERC regulations also permit QFs and utilities to negotiate agreements for utility purchases of power at rates other than the utility's avoided cost.

Residential Real Estate Brokerage Company

HomeServices and its operating subsidiaries are regulated by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau which enforces the Truth In Lending Act ("TILA"), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ("ECOA") and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"); by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission with respect to certain franchising activities; by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which enforces the Fair Housing Act ("FHA"); and by state agencies where its subsidiaries operate. TILA and ECOA regulate lending practices. FHA prohibits housing-related discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. RESPA regulates real estate settlement services including real estate closing practices, lender servicing and escrow account practices and business relationships among settlement service providers and third parties to the transaction.

50


REGULATORY MATTERS

In addition to the discussion contained herein regarding regulatory matters, refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding the general regulatory framework.

PacifiCorp

Oregon

In July 2021, in accordance with the OPUC's December 2020 general rate case order, PacifiCorp filed an application with the OPUC to initiate the review of PacifiCorp's estimated decommissioning and other closure costs per third-party studies associated with its coal-fueled generating facilities. The application requested an initial rate increase of $35 million, or 2.8%, to become effective January 1, 2022, to recover the incremental costs from those approved in the last general rate case. In November 2023, an independent evaluator was selected. Until the independent evaluator completes its work reviewing the third party studies that contain the estimated decommissioning and other closure costs and the OPUC issues an order, there will be no change to rates related to this filing.

In March 2022, PacifiCorp filed a general rate case requesting an overall rate change of $82 million, or 6.6%, to become effective January 1, 2023, that includes cost increases associated with the implementation of PacifiCorp's wildfire mitigation and vegetation management plans. Parties to the case filed testimony in June 2022. PacifiCorp filed reply testimony in July 2022 supporting an overall rate increase of $94 million but proposing that the request be capped at PacifiCorp's original request. PacifiCorp and parties to the case settled various aspects of the entitygeneral rate case in multiple settlement stipulations. In August 2022, the first partial stipulation was filed resolving issues related to wildfire mitigation and vegetation management, including addressing the associated costs increases. Also in August 2022, a second partial stipulation was filed representing the settlement of certain revenue requirement issues among the stipulating parties, including the extension of Oregon's recovery period for Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 that will be converted to natural gas-fueled units and certain other issues. In September 2022, a third stipulation was filed resolving most of the remaining issues in the general rate case following the first and second partial stipulations. The stipulations together result in a total rate increase of $49 million, or 3.9%, effective January 1, 2023. The stipulating parties also agreed to amortize certain deferrals totaling approximately $10 million, or 0.8 %, in the first year of amortization, effective April 1, 2023. Further, in the third stipulation, PacifiCorp agreed to a general rate case stay-out provision under which it agreed not to file a general rate case with rates effective any earlier than January 1, 2025. In September 2022, the fourth and final partial stipulation was filed resolving technical issues related to a voluntary renewable energy tariff that will allow non-residential customers to purchase energy from renewable resources not currently in PacifiCorp's rates. In December 2022, the OPUC approved the first, second and third stipulations. The fourth stipulation was approved by the OPUC in February 2023.

In May 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2021 PCAM, which is partythe first time since the mechanism has been in place that a rate change has been warranted. After consideration of the mechanism's deadband, sharing band and earnings test, PacifiCorp requested recovery of $52 million, or a 4.2% increase, to become effective January 1, 2023. This request is incremental to the transactionrate change sought in the general rate case. In September 2022, a settlement stipulation was filed agreeing to the recovery of the requested $52 million over a four-year period beginning April 1, 2023. In December 2022, the OPUC approved the settlement stipulation.

In July 2022, PacifiCorp filed an application requesting approval of an automatic adjustment clause with a balancing account to recover costs associated with implementing PacifiCorp's wildfire protection plan in Oregon. Oregon Senate Bill 762 provides for utilities to timely recover these costs through an automatic adjustment clause. The filing requests a rate increase of $20 million, or 1.6%, to recover incremental costs in 2022 and is incremental to costs addressed in PacifiCorp's wildfire mitigation and vegetation management mechanism through the general rate case stipulation described above. While PacifiCorp requested an effective date of August 24, 2022, the OPUC has suspended the filing for further review. In December 2022, a stipulation with certain parties was filed agreeing to the establishment of an automatic adjustment clause. A decision on the stipulation is expected in 2023.

Washington

In June 2021, PacifiCorp filed a power cost only rate case to update baseline net power costs for 2022. PacifiCorp requested a $13 million, or 3.7%, rate increase with an effective date of January 1, 2022. In November 2021, PacifiCorp reached a proposed settlement with most of the parties, which includes an agreement to adjust the PTC rate in base rates and apply a production factor and include a net power cost update as part of the compliance filing. A hearing was held in January 2022 and the WUTC issued an order approving the settlement in March 2022. A compliance filing reflecting a $43 million, or 12.2%, increase was filed in April 2022 and was approved by the WUTC the same month with rates effective May 1, 2022.
51



In June 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2021 PCAM and the new tracking mechanism for PTCs approved in the 2021 general rate case. For the 2021 PCAM, PacifiCorp is requesting a recovery of $26 million, or a 6.5% increase. PacifiCorp proposed that the 2021 PCAM be amortized over two years, rather than the one-year period required under the current terms of the PCAM. For the new 2021 PTC tracker, PacifiCorp is seeking recovery of $3 million, or an 0.8% increase. In November 2022, the WUTC approved PacifiCorp's proposal resulting in a combined annual increase of $16 million, or 4.0%, effective January 1, 2023.

Idaho

In October 2022, PacifiCorp filed an application for authority to implement the residential rate modernization plan. The plan proposes a five-year transition to increase the monthly customer service charge from $8.00 to $29.25 per month with a corresponding reduction to the energy rate, eliminates the tiered rates, and adjusts the on-peak off-peak period for time-of-day customers.

California

In August 2021, PacifiCorp filed an application with the CPUC to address California energy costs and GHG allowance costs, and in January 2022, an amended application was filed, per CPUC direction, to reflect ECAC rates which had been approved since the original filing was made. The amended application included an over $3 million rate increase associated with higher energy costs, and the previously sought increase of $3 million to recover GHG allowances. In March 2022, the CPUC approved the increase of $3 million to recover costs for purchasing GHG allowances as required by the state's Cap-and-Trade program. In November 2022, the CPUC approved and made effective the over $3 million rate increase associated with higher energy costs, for a combined rate increase of $7 million, or 6.6%.

In May 2022, PacifiCorp filed a general rate case requesting an overall rate change of $28 million, or 25.7%, to become effective January 1, 2023. In November 2022, the CPUC granted the requested rate effective date and directed PacifiCorp to establish a memorandum account to track the change in rates beginning January 1, 2023 until the new rates become effective, upon the issuance of a decision in late 2023. PacifiCorp filed rebuttal testimony in February 2023 with a slight adjustment of an overall rate increase of $27 million, or 25.0%. Also in February 2023, the CPUC issued a ruling requesting additional information on PacifiCorp's wildfire and risk analyses, and requested additional information regarding wildfire memorandum accounts.

In August 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2023 combined ECAC and GHG application requesting an overall rate increase of $15 million, or 13.6%, effective January 1, 2023. Approximately $4 million of the increase, or 3.6%, is attributed to the ECAC rate and $11 million of the increase, or 10.0%, to the GHG rate. In February 2023, PacifiCorp filed an amended application, per CPUC direction, to reflect ECAC rates which had been approved since the original filing was made in August 2022. The amended application would result in an overall rate increase of $11 million, or 10.1%. PacifiCorp anticipates interim approval of its GHG rates in March 2023 based on settlement discussions with parties.

FERC Show Cause Order

On April 15, 2021, the FERC issued an order to show cause and notice of proposed penalty related to allegations made by FERC Office of Enforcement staff that PacifiCorp failed to comply with certain NERC reliability standards associated with facility ratings on PacifiCorp's bulk electric system. The order directs PacifiCorp to show cause as to why it should not be assessed a civil penalty of $42 million as a result of the alleged violations. The allegations are related to PacifiCorp's response to a 2010 industry-wide effort directed by the NERC to identify and remediate certain discrepancies resulting from transmission facility design and actual field conditions, including transmission line clearances. In July 2021, PacifiCorp filed its answer to the FERC's show cause order denying the alleged violation of certain NERC reliability standards. The FERC Office of Enforcement staff replied in September 2021. In December 2022, the FERC issued a final order approving a stipulation and consent agreement between the FERC Office of Enforcement and PacifiCorp whereby PacifiCorp agreed to pay a $1.9 million cash penalty and committed to invest $2.5 million in reliability enhancements. The final order concludes the matter.

52


MidAmerican Energy

South Dakota

In May 2022, MidAmerican Energy filed a request with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission ("SDPUC") for an increase in its South Dakota retail natural gas rates, which would increase revenue by $7 million annually. If approved, the requested rates would increase retail customers' bills by an average of 6.4%.

Wind PRIME

In January 2022, MidAmerican Energy filed an application with the IUB for advance ratemaking principles for Wind PRIME. If approved, MidAmerican Energy expects to proceed with Wind PRIME, which consists of up to 2,042 MWs of new wind generation and up to 50 MWs of solar generation. If all of Wind PRIME generation is constructed, MidAmerican Energy will own over 9,300 MWs of wind generation and nearly 200 MWs of solar generation. Wind PRIME is projected to allow MidAmerican Energy to generate renewable energy greater than or equal to all of its Iowa retail customers' annual energy needs. MidAmerican Energy secured sufficient safe harbor equipment necessary to remain eligible for 100% PTCs under current tax law. Procedural hearings with the IUB began in February 2023.

Iowa Transmission Legislation

In June 2020, Iowa enacted legislation that grants incumbent electric transmission owners the right to construct, own and maintain electric transmission lines that have been approved for construction in a federally registered planning authority's transmission plan and that connect to the incumbent electric transmission owner's facility. Also known as the Right of First Refusal, the law ensures MidAmerican Energy, as an incumbent electric transmission owner, has the legal right to construct, own and maintain transmission lines that have been approved by the MISO (or another federally registered planning authority) in MidAmerican Energy's service territory. To exercise the legal right, MidAmerican Energy must notify the IUB within 90 days of any such approval for construction that it intends to construct, own and maintain the electric transmission line. The law still requires an incumbent electric transmission owner to obtain a state franchise from the IUB to construct, erect, maintain or operate an electric transmission line and, upon issuance of a franchise, the incumbent electric transmission owner must provide the IUB an estimate of the cost to construct the electric transmission line and, until the construction is complete, a quarterly report updating the estimated cost to construct the electric transmission line. Legal challenges have been brought against similar laws in other states, but courts that have ruled on such cases have upheld the states' laws. In October 2020, a lawsuit challenging the law was filed in Iowa by national transmission interests. The suit raised issues specific to Iowa law, and the State of Iowa defended the law in the suit. MidAmerican Energy intervened and defended the law as well. The Iowa district court dismissed the lawsuit in March 2021 for lack of standing, and the national transmission interests appealed. In June 2022, the Iowa Court of Appeals upheld the district court's decision, after which the national transmission interests asked the Iowa Supreme Court to reconsider. In November 2022, the Iowa Supreme Court granted the motion to reconsider and accepted the case on the briefs already submitted; it is expected that oral arguments will be held in spring 2023. No stay of the law has been granted, and the law remains in effect pending appeal.

53


NV Energy (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific)

Senate Bill 448 ("SB 448")

SB 448 was signed into law on June 10, 2021. The legislation is intended to accelerate transmission development, renewable energy and storage, and accelerate transportation electrification within the state of Nevada. In September 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed an amendment to the 2021 Joint IRP for the approval of their Transmission Infrastructure for a Clean Energy Economy Plan that sets forth a plan for the construction of high-voltage transmission infrastructure, Greenlink North among others, that will be placed into service no later than December 31, 2028, and requires the IRP to include at least one scenario that uses sources of supply that will achieve certain reductions in carbon dioxide emissions. In September 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed an application for the approval of their Economic Recovery Transportation Electrification Plan to accelerate transportation electrification in the state of Nevada. The plan establishes requirements for the contents of the transportation electrification investment as well as requirements for review, cost recovery and monitoring. The plan covers an initial period beginning January 1, 2022 and ending on December 31, 2024. In November 2021, the PUCN issued an order granting the application and accepting the Economic Recovery Transportation Electrification Plan with some modifications. The PUCN opened rulemakings to address other regulations that resulted from SB 448. In February 2022, the PUCN adopted regulations regarding the Economic Development Electric Rate Rider Program to revise the discounted electric rates to ease the economic burden on small businesses who take advantage of the discounted rates under the tariff. In September 2022, the PUCN adopted regulations regarding resource planning, which incorporates a plan to accelerate transportation electrification into the distributed resources plan pursuant to SB 448.

Transportation Electrification Plan ("TEP")

In September 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed an amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for the approval of a Distributed Resource Plan amendment to implement the state's first TEP pursuant to Section 51 of SB 448 and approve proposed tariffs and schedules to implement the TEP. The 2022 TEP outlines programs, investments and incentives to accelerate transportation electrification across Nevada. The Nevada Utilities proposed a budget of $348 million, which represents the maximum cost over the depreciable life of the TEP's programs and assets, to deploy the TEP in 2023 through 2024. A hearing related to the application for approval of the TEP was held in February 2023.

ON Line Temporary Rider ("ONTR")

In October 2021, Sierra Pacific filed an application with the PUCN for approval of the ONTR with corresponding updates to its electric rate tariffs to authorize recovery of the One Nevada Transmission Line ("ON Line") regulatory asset being accumulated as a result of the ON Line cost reallocation as well as the related on-going reallocated revenue requirement. Sierra Pacific's application would have, if approved by the PUCN as filed, resulted in a one-time rate increase of $28 million to be collected over a nine-month period starting on April 1, 2022. In March 2022, the PUCN issued an order directing Sierra Pacific to recover $14 million of the ON Line regulatory asset as a one-time rate increase collectable over a nine-month period effective April 1, 2022, with the expected remaining balance at December 31, 2022 to be included in earnings.rate base in the 2022 regulatory rate review for inclusion in the rates set in that case. In December 2022, the PUCN issued an order in the general rate review proceeding allowing for recovery of the remaining regulatory asset balance and directed Sierra Pacific to establish a regulatory liability for any over-collection of revenues from the ONTR rate rider which shall accrue carry charges.


Income TaxesMerger Application


Berkshire Hathaway includesIn March 2022, the CompanyNevada Utilities filed a joint application with the PUCN for authorization to merge Sierra Pacific with and into Nevada Power, with Nevada Power being the surviving entity. If approved by the PUCN as filed, Nevada Power will have two distinct electric service territories in northern and southern Nevada each with their own rates and one natural gas service territory in the Reno and Sparks area. In October 2022, all parties to the proceedings relating to the joint application entered into a Stipulation to delay the procedural schedule. The Nevada Utilities made a supplemental filing on December 30, 2022. An order is expected in the first half of 2023.

54


Regulatory Rate Review

In June 2022, Sierra Pacific filed a regulatory rate review with the PUCN that requested an annual revenue increase of $88 million, or 9.7%. In addition, a filing was made to revise depreciation rates based on a study, the results of which are reflected in the proposed revenue requirement. In August 2022, Sierra Pacific filed an updated certification filing that updated the requested annual revenue increase to $77 million, or 8.5%. Parties to the docket filed testimony and supporting documentation in August and September 2022 while rebuttal testimony was filed in September and October 2022. Hearings in the cost of capital, revenue requirement, and rate design phases were held in September, October, and November 2022, respectively. In December 2022, the PUCN issued an order approving an increase in base rates of $58 million, effective January 1, 2023, reflecting a reduction in Sierra Pacific's requested rate of return, updated depreciation and amortization rates for its electric operations and updated time of use periods to reflect the changes in system costs due to the increased solar generation on the system.

BHE Pipeline Group

BHE GT&S

In September 2021, EGTS filed a general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective November 1, 2021. EGTS' previous general rate case was settled in 1998. EGTS proposed an annual cost-of-service of approximately $1.1 billion, and requested increases in various rates, including general system storage rates by 85% and general system transmission rates by 60%. In October 2021, the FERC issued an order that accepted the November 1, 2021 effective date for certain changes in rates, while suspending the other changes for five months following the proposed effective date, until April 1, 2022, subject to refund. In September 2022, a settlement agreement was filed with the FERC, resolving EGTS' general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services and providing for increased service rates and decreased depreciation rates. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, EGTS' rates result in an increase to annual firm transmission and storage revenues of approximately $160 million and a decrease in annual depreciation expense of approximately $30 million, compared to the rates in effect prior to April 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, EGTS' provision for rate refund for April 2022 through December 2022 totaled $90 million and was included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In November 2022, the FERC approved the settlement agreement.

In January 2020, pursuant to the terms of a previous settlement, Cove Point filed a general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective March 1, 2020. Cove Point proposed an annual cost-of-service of approximately $182 million. In February 2020, the FERC approved suspending the changes in rates for five months following the proposed effective date, until August 1, 2020, subject to refund. In November 2020, Cove Point reached an agreement in principle with the active participants in the general rate case proceeding. Under the terms of the agreement in principle, Cove Point's rates effective August 1, 2020 resulted in an increase to annual revenues of approximately $4 million and a decrease in annual depreciation expense of approximately $1 million, compared to the rates in effect prior to August 1, 2020. The interim settlement rates were implemented November 1, 2020, and Cove Point's provision for rate refunds for August 2020 through October 2020 totaled $7 million. The agreement in principle was reflected in a stipulation and agreement filed with the FERC in January 2021. In March 2021, the FERC approved the stipulation and agreement and the rate refunds to customers were processed in late April 2021.

Northern Natural Gas

In July 2022, Northern Natural Gas filed a general rate case that proposed an overall annual cost-of-service of $1.3 billion. This is an increase of $323 million above the cost of service filed in its consolidated United States2019 rate case of $1.0 billion. Depreciation on increased rate base and an increase in depreciation and negative salvage rates account for $115 million of the $323 million increase in the filed cost of service. Northern Natural Gas has requested increases in various rates, including transportation and storage reservation rates. In January 2023, the FERC approved Northern Natural Gas filing to implement its interim rates effective January 1, 2023, subject to refund and the outcome of hearing procedures.

55


BHE Transmission

AltaLink

2022-2023 General Tariff Application

In April 2021, AltaLink filed its 2022-2023 GTA delivering on the last two years of its commitment to keep rates flat for customers at or below the 2018 level of C$904 million for the five-year period from 2019 to 2023. The two-year application achieves flat tariffs by continuing to transition to the AUC-approved salvage recovery method and continuing the use of the flow-through income tax method, with an overall year-over-year increase of approximately 2% in 2022 and 2023 revenue requirements. AltaLink's 2022-2023 GTA reflected its continued commitment to provide rate stability to customers by maintaining flat tariffs and providing additional tariff relief measures, including a proposed tariff refund of C$60 million of accumulated depreciation in each of 2022 and 2023. The application requested the approval of transmission tariffs of C$824 million and C$847 million for 2022 and 2023, respectively after proposed refunds. In September 2021, AltaLink provided responses to information requests from the AUC and filed an amended application to reflect certain adjustments and forecast updates.

In January 2022, the AUC issued its decision with respect to AltaLink's 2022-2023 GTA. The AUC did not approve AltaLink's proposed refund due to an anticipated improvement in general economic conditions in Alberta. In March 2022, AltaLink filed a review and variance application requesting the AUC to review and vary its decision to deny AltaLink's proposed C$120 million refund of accumulated depreciation surplus, given material changes in circumstances since the decision was issued in January 2022. In May 2022, the AUC issued a decision with respect to AltaLink's application to review and vary its proposed $120 million refund of accumulated depreciation surplus. The AUC did not agree that the Alberta economy had materially deteriorated and determined that the long-term costs outweigh the short-term benefits of the refund.

In July 2022, AltaLink submitted its second compliance filing application with total 2022 and 2023 revenue requirements at C$879 million and C$883 million, respectively. In August 2022, the AUC approved the revised revenue requirements as filed, allowing AltaLink to fully deliver on its flat-for-five commitment to customers.

Generic Cost of Capital Proceeding

In January 2022, the AUC initiated the 2023 generic cost of capital proceeding. The proceeding will be conducted in two stages. The first stage will determine the cost of capital parameters for 2023 and the second stage will consider returning to a formula-based approach to establish cost of capital adjustments, commencing in 2024. In March 2022, the AUC issued its decision with respect to the first stage of the 2023 GCOC proceeding by approving the extension of the 2022 return on equity of 8.5% and deemed equity ratio of 37% for 2023, recognizing lingering uncertainty and continued volatility of financial markets due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In June 2022, the AUC initiated the second stage to explore a formula-based approach to determine the return on equity for 2024 and future test periods.

BHE U.S. Transmission

A significant portion of ETT's revenues are based on interim rate changes that can be filed twice annually and are subject to review and possible true-up in the next filed base regulatory rate review scheduled for no later than February 1, 2025. In February 2023, the Public Utilities Commission of Texas ("PUCT") approved ETT's request to suspend a base regulatory rate review filing scheduled for February 2023. Results of a base regulatory rate review would be prospective except for any deemed disallowance by the PUCT of the transmission investment since the initial base regulatory rate review in 2007. In June 2018, the PUCT approved ETT's application to reduce its transmission revenue by $28 million to reflect the lower federal income tax return. The Company's provision forrate due to 2017 Tax Reform with the amortization of excess accumulated deferred federal income taxes has been computed on a stand-alone basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using estimated income tax rates expected to be addressed in effectthe next base rate case.

56


ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

Each Registrant is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact each Registrant's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state, local and international agencies. Each Registrant believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many laws and regulations are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the yearcourts.

The Company has cumulative investments in which(i) owned wind, solar and geothermal generating facilities of $31.6 billion and (ii) wind tax equity investments of $5.8 billion and has retired 16 coal-fueled generation facilities. As a result, as of December 31 2022, the differences are expectedCompany reduced its annual GHG emissions by more than 27% as compared to reverse. Changes2005 levels. The Company plans to continue investing in deferred income tax assetswind, solar and liabilities that are associated with componentsother low-carbon generation and storage in the future, including (i) $6.4 billion on the construction of OCI are charged or credited directlyrenewable generating facilities and repowering certain existing wind-powered generating facilities through 2025 and (ii) $1.3 billion on the construction of electric battery and pumped hydro storage facilities through 2025, and to OCI. retire an additional 16 coal-fueled generation facilities between 2023 and 2030 in a reliable and cost-effective manner, thereby achieving a 50% reduction in GHG emissions from 2005 levels in 2030. Refer to "Liquidity and Capital Resources" of each respective Registrant in Item 7 of this Form 10-K for discussion of each Registrant's renewable generation-related capital expenditures.

On December 22, 2017,August 16, 2022, the Tax Cuts and JobsInflation Reduction Act ("2017 Tax Reform"of 2022 (the "2022 Act") was signed into law which, among other items, reduces the federallaw. The 2022 Act contains numerous provisions, including expanded tax credits for clean energy incentives and a 15% corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Changes in deferredalternative minimum income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with income tax benefits and expense for the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that the Company's regulated businesses deems probable to be passed on to their customers in most state and provincial jurisdictions are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized. Investment tax credits are generally deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives"adjusted financial statement income". The provisions of the related properties or as prescribed by various regulatory jurisdictions.

The 2017 Tax Reform also creates a one-time repatriation2022 Act become effective for tax on the Company's undistributed foreign corporations' post-1986 accumulated earnings and profits. Therefore, the cumulative undistributed foreign earnings were deemed repatriated to the United States as ofyears beginning after December 31, 2017.2022. The Company currently does not believeexpect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. However, the deemed repatriation has alteredCompany expects future guidance from the Company's existing assertionTreasury Department and will continue to evaluate the impact of the 2022 Act as more guidance becomes available.

Air Quality Regulations

The Clean Air Act, as well as state laws and regulations impacting air emissions, provides a framework for protecting and improving the nation's air quality and controlling sources of air emissions. These laws and regulations continue to be promulgated and implemented and will impact the operation of BHE's generating facilities and require them to reduce emissions at those facilities to comply with the requirements. In addition, the potential adoption of state or federal clean energy standards, which include low-carbon, non-carbon and renewable electricity generating resources, may also impact electricity generators and natural gas providers.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Under the authority of the Clean Air Act, the EPA sets minimum NAAQS for six principal pollutants, consisting of carbon monoxide, lead, NOx, particulate matter, ozone and SO2, considered harmful to public health and the environment. Areas that undistributed earningsachieve the standards, as determined by ambient air quality monitoring, are characterized as being in attainment, while those that fail to meet the standards are designated as being nonattainment areas. Generally, sources of emissions in a nonattainment area that are determined to contribute to the nonattainment are required to reduce emissions. Currently, with the exceptions described in the following paragraphs, air quality monitoring data indicates that all counties where the relevant Registrant's major emission sources are located are in attainment of the current NAAQS.

57


On June 4, 2018, the EPA published final ozone designations for much of the U.S. Relevant to the Registrants, these designations include classifying Yuma County, Arizona; Clark County, Nevada; and the Northern Wasatch Front, Southern Wasatch Front and Duchesne and Uintah counties in Utah as nonattainment-marginal with the 2015 ozone standard. These areas were required to meet the 2015 standard three years from the August 3, 2018, effective date. All other areas relevant to the Registrants were designated attainment/unclassifiable with this same action. However, on January 29, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated several provisions of the 2018 implementing rules for the 2015 ozone standards for contravening the Clean Air Act. The EPA and environmental groups finalized a consent decree in January 2022 that sets deadlines for the agency to approve or disapprove the "good neighbor" provisions of interstate ozone plans of dozens of states. Relevant to the Registrants, the EPA must, by April 30, 2022, propose to approve or disapprove the interstate ozone SIPs of Alabama, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin. On February 22, 2022, the EPA published a series of proposed decisions to disapprove the SIPs for interstate ozone transport of 19 states. Relevant to the Registrants, these states include Alabama, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The EPA also proposed to approve Iowa's SIP after re-analyzing the state's data. In addition, the EPA must approve or disapprove the interstate plans of Arizona, California, Nevada and Wyoming. On April 15, 2022 the EPA issued its final rule approving Iowa's SIP as meeting the good neighbor provisions for the 2015 ozone standard. On May 24, 2022 the EPA disapproved the Utah and Wyoming interstate ozone SIPs. On January 30, 2023, the EPA entered into a stipulated extension to the deadline for action on the Wyoming SIP, setting a new deadline of December 15, 2023. The EPA explained that the extra time is needed to fully consider updated air quality information and public comments. The EPA is also reevaluating SIPs for Tennessee and Arizona. On January 31, 2023, the EPA issued final disapproval of the 19 SIPs proposed in April 2022, setting the stage to include those states in the federal implementation plan described under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule. Separately, on March 28, 2022, the EPA proposed determinations as to whether certain areas have achieved levels of ground-level ozone pollution that meet the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS. Relevant to Registrants, the Southern Wasatch Front in Utah and Yuma, Arizona are proposed to have met the 2015 ozone standard; and the Cincinnati area of Ohio and Kentucky and the Northern Wasatch Front in Utah are proposed to have not met the 2015 ozone, will be reinvested indefinitely;reclassified as Moderate Non-Attainment, and will have until August 3, 2024 to meet the standard. Until the EPA takes final action on the proposal and the affected states submit any required SIPs, the relevant Registrants cannot determine the impacts of the proposed rule.

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

The EPA promulgated an initial rule in March 2005 to reduce emissions of NOx and SO2, precursors of ozone and particulate matter, from down-wind sources in the eastern U.S. to reduce emissions by implementing a plan based on a market-based cap-and-trade system, emissions reductions, or both. After numerous appeals, the CSAPR was promulgated to address interstate transport of SO2 and NOx emissions in 27 Eastern and Midwestern states. In March 2022, the EPA released its Good Neighbor Rule, which contains proposed revisions to the CSAPR framework and is intended to address ozone transport for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. The rule focuses on reductions of NOx and covers 26 states. Relevant to the Registrants, four states are included in the cross-state program for the first time - California, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. The EPA proposes to retain emissions allowance trading for generating facilities. Beginning in 2023, emissions budgets would be set at the level of reductions achievable through immediately available measures such as consistently operating existing emissions controls. Starting in 2026, emissions budgets would be set at levels achievable by the installation of SCR controls at certain generating facilities. The proposal also includes additional industries beyond the power sector for the first time, with a focus on the top NOx emitting stationary source categories. These include natural gas pipeline compressor stations, among others. These sources will not have access to trading and will instead be subject to rate-based limits that are assigned for each source category. The EPA accepted comments on the proposal through June 21, 2022. On February 1, 2023, the EPA released updated air transport modeling that indicates two states, Delaware and Wyoming, do not significantly contribute to downwind maintenance receptors; and that four states, Arizona, Iowa, Kansas and New Mexico, in fact do significantly contribute to downwind maintenance receptors. It is anticipated that the EPA will rely on this updated modeling in the final good neighbor rule, which it intends to finalize in March 2023. Additional notice and comment rulemaking, such as a supplemental rule, would be required to rescind Iowa's approved SIP and incorporate additional states into the program. Until the EPA takes final action consistent with this decree, impacts to the relevant Registrants cannot be determined.

Regional Haze

The EPA's Regional Haze Rule, finalized in 1999, requires states to develop and implement plans to improve visibility in designated federally protected areas ("Class I areas"). Some of PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities in Utah, Wyoming, Arizona and Colorado and certain of Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's fossil-fueled generating facilities are subject to the Clean Air Visibility Rules. In accordance with the federal requirements, states are required to submit SIPs that address emissions from sources subject to BART requirements and demonstrate progress towards achieving natural visibility requirements in Class I areas by 2064.

58


In June 2019, the state of Utah incorporated a BART alternative into its SIP for regional haze planning period one. The BART alternative makes the shutdown of PacifiCorp's Carbon generating facility enforceable under the SIP and removes the requirement to install SCR equipment on Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington Units 1 and 2. The EPA approved the SIP revision with the BART alternative in October 2020. The EPA's actions also withdrew a prior FIP that required installation of SCR equipment on Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington Units 1 and 2. On January 19, 2021, Heal Utah, National Parks Conservation Association, Sierra Club and Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment filed a petition for review of the Utah Regional Haze SIP Alternative in the Tenth Circuit. PacifiCorp and the state of Utah moved to intervene in the litigation. After review of the rule by the Biden administration, the EPA determined it would defend the rule and briefing has been completed. A date for oral arguments has not been scheduled. The Utah Air Quality Board approved the Utah Division of Air Quality's SIP for the regional haze second planning period on June 6, 2022. The SIP sets mass-based NOx emissions limits and rate-based SO2 limits for PacifiCorp's Hunter and Huntington generating facilities to ensure reasonable visibility progress for the second planning period.

The state of Wyoming issued two regional haze SIPs requiring the installation of SO2, NOx and particulate matter controls on certain PacifiCorp coal-fueled generating facilities in Wyoming. The EPA approved the SO2 SIP in December 2012 and the EPA's approval was upheld on appeal by the Tenth Circuit in October 2014. The EPA's final action on the Wyoming SIP in 2014 approved the state's plan to have PacifiCorp install low-NOx burners at Naughton Units 1 and 2, SCR controls at Naughton Unit 3 by December 2014, SCR controls at Jim Bridger Units 1 through 4 between 2015 and 2022, and low-NOx burners at Dave Johnston Unit 4. The EPA disapproved a portion of the Wyoming SIP and issued a FIP for Dave Johnston Unit 3, where it required the installation of SCR controls by 2019 or, in lieu of installing SCR controls, a commitment to shut down Dave Johnston Unit 3 by 2027, its currently approved depreciable life. The EPA also disapproved a portion of the Wyoming SIP and issued a FIP for the Wyodak coal-fueled generating facility, requiring the installation of SCR controls by 2019. PacifiCorp filed an appeal of the EPA's final action on Wyodak in March 2014. The state of Wyoming and several environmental groups also filed an appeal of the EPA's final action. In September 2014, the Tenth Circuit issued a stay of the March 2019 compliance deadline for Wyodak, pending further action by the Tenth Circuit in the appeal. The abatement on litigation was lifted September 28, 2022, and opening briefs were submitted in October 2022. PacifiCorp objects to the EPA's FIP requiring SCR on the Wyodak Unit. That requirement in the agency's plan remains stayed by the court. PacifiCorp has also intervened on behalf of the EPA against claims that Naughton Units 1 and 2 should have been subject to a SCR requirement. Separately, on February 14, 2022, the First Judicial District Court for the State of Wyoming entered a consent decree reached between the state of Wyoming and PacifiCorp resolving claims of threatened violations of the Clean Air Act, the Wyoming Environmental Quality Act and the Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations at the Jim Bridger facility. No penalties were imposed under the consent decree. Consistent with the terms and conditions of the consent decree, PacifiCorp must convert both units to natural gas and begin meeting emissions limits consistent with that conversion by January 1, 2024. The EPA and PacifiCorp executed an administrative order on consent June 9, 2022, covering compliance for Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 under the regional haze rule. The federal order contains the same emission and operating limits as the Wyoming consent decree and adds federal approval of the compliance pathway outlined in the state consent decree, including revision of the SIP to include conversion of Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 to natural gas. The order includes a one-year deadline to complete the SIP revision. On December 30, 2022, the Wyoming Air Quality Division submitted the state-approved revised regional haze state implementation plan requiring natural gas conversion of Jim Bridger units 1 and 2 to the EPA for approval. The plan revision replaces a previous requirement for selective catalytic reduction at the units. The Wyoming Air Quality Division also issued an air permit for the natural gas conversion of Jim Bridger units 1 and 2 on December 28, 2022. The EPA is expected to conduct a separate federal public comment process on the plan. For the second round of regional haze planning, Wyoming determined that no controls will be necessary on any Wyoming resources to make reasonable progress.

The state of Colorado regional haze SIP requires SCR equipment at Craig Unit 2 and Hayden Units 1 and 2, in which PacifiCorp has ownership interests. Each of those regional haze compliance projects are in-service. In addition, in February 2015, the state of Colorado finalized an amendment to its regional haze SIP relating to Craig Unit 1, in which PacifiCorp has an ownership interest, to require the installation of SCR controls by 2021. In September 2016, the owners of Craig Units 1 and 2 reached an agreement with state and federal agencies and certain environmental groups that were parties to the previous settlement requiring SCR to retire Unit 1 by December 31, 2025, in lieu of SCR installation, or alternatively to remove the unit from coal-fueled service by August 31, 2021 with an option to convert the unit to natural gas by August 31, 2023, in lieu of SCR installation. The terms of the agreement were approved by the Colorado Air Quality Board in December 2016, incorporated into an amended Colorado regional haze SIP in 2017 and approved by the EPA in August 2018. PacifiCorp identified a December 31, 2025, retirement date for Craig Unit 1 in its 2017 and 2019 IRPs.

59


Nevada, Utah and Wyoming each submitted regional haze SIPs for the regional haze second planning period to the EPA in August 2022. The EPA has 18 months to approve or disapprove all or parts of the states' plans. On August 25, 2022, the EPA promulgated a finding of failure to submit a SIP for the regional haze second planning period for 15 states, including Iowa. The finding establishes a two-year deadline for the agency to promulgate FIPs to address the requirements, unless prior to promulgating a FIP, the state submits, and the agency approves, a SIP meeting the requirements. The finding says the agency intends to continue to work with states in developing approvable SIP submittals in a timely manner. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources continues to work with the EPA on development of its SIP. On February 13, 2023, Iowa issued a draft SIP and will accept comment on the draft plan through March 16, 2023. Iowa proposes to require operational improvements to existing control equipment at MidAmerican Energy Company's Louisa Generation Station and Walter Scott Jr. Energy Center - Unit 3. Iowa anticipates submitting a final plan to the EPA in spring 2023.

Climate Change

In December 2015, an international agreement was negotiated by 195 nations to create a universal framework for coordinated action on climate change in what is referred to as the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement reaffirms the goal of limiting global temperature increase well below 2 degrees Celsius, while urging efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius and reaching a global peak of GHG emissions as soon as possible to achieve climate neutrality by mid-century; establishes commitments by all parties to make nationally determined contributions and pursue domestic measures aimed at achieving the commitments; commits all countries to submit emissions inventories and report regularly on their emissions and progress made in implementing and achieving their nationally determined commitments; and commits all countries to submit new commitments every five years, with the expectation that the commitments will get more aggressive. In the context of the Paris Agreement, the U.S. agreed to reduce GHG emissions 26% to 28% by 2025 from 2005 levels. After more than 55 countries representing more than 55% of global GHG emissions submitted their ratification documents, the Paris Agreement became effective November 4, 2016; however, the Company periodically evaluatesU.S. completed its capitalwithdrawal from the Paris Agreement on November 4, 2020. President Biden accepted the terms of the climate agreement on January 20, 2021, and the U.S. completed its reentry February 19, 2021. New commitments to the Paris Agreement were announced in April 2021, with the U.S. pledging to cut its overall GHG emissions 50% to 52% from 2005 levels by 2030 and to reach 100% carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035. Increasingly, states are adopting legislation and regulations to reduce GHG emissions, and local governments and consumers are seeking increasing amounts of clean and renewable energy.

60


GHG Performance Standards

Affordable Clean Energy Rule

In June 2014, the EPA released proposed regulations to address GHG emissions from existing fossil-fueled generating facilities, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The EPA's proposal calculated state-specific emission rate targets to be achieved based on the "best system of emission reduction." In August 2015, the final Clean Power Plan was released, which established the best system of emission reduction as including: (a) heat rate improvements; (b) increased utilization of existing combined-cycle natural gas-fueled generating facilities; and (c) increased deployment of new and incremental non-carbon generation placed in-service after 2012. The Clean Power Plan was stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in February 2016 while litigation proceeded. On June 19, 2019, the EPA repealed the Clean Power Plan and issued the Affordable Clean Energy rule. In the Affordable Clean Energy rule, the EPA determined that the best system of emission reduction for existing coal-fueled generating facilities is limited to actions that can be taken at a point source facility, specifically heat rate improvements and identified a set of candidate technologies and measures that could improve heat rates. Measures taken to meet the standards of performance must be achieved at the source itself. The Affordable Clean Energy rule was challenged by environmental and health groups in the D.C. Circuit. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded the Affordable Clean Energy rule to the EPA, finding that the rule "rested critically on a mistaken reading of the Clean Air Act" that limited the best system of emission reduction to actions taken at a facility. In October 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal of that decision. Arguments in the case were held February 28, 2022, and on June 30, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision regarding the scope of the EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the "generation shifting" approach in the Clean Power Plan exceeded the powers granted to the EPA by Congress, although the court did not address whether the EPA may only adopt measures applied at the individual source as it did in the Affordable Clean Energy rule. A key area where the EPA went astray was using the Clean Power Plan to give states the option to promulgate regulations that would encourage "generation shifting," or moving away from higher-polluting power sources like coal to lower-polluting sources like natural gas or renewables. The U.S. Supreme Court found that type of regulation, which would impact larger economic forces beyond the fence lines of individual generating facilities, is not permitted under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit's vacatur of the Affordable Clean Energy rule and remanded the case for further proceedings. The ruling has no immediate impact on the Registrants, as there is no Section 111(d) rule currently in effect. The Biden administration plans to propose by March 2023 its own rule to replace the Clean Power Plan and Affordable Clean Energy rule.

New Source Performance Standards for Methane Emissions

In August 2020, the EPA finalized regulations to rescind standards for methane emissions from the oil and gas sector. The changes eliminate requirements to regulate methane emissions from the production, processing, transmission and storage of oil and gas. The rule was immediately challenged by environmental and tribal groups, as well as numerous states. In January 2021, the D.C. Circuit lifted an administrative stay and allowed the rule to take effect, finding that groups challenging the rule had not met the standard for a long-term stay. On June 30, 2021, President Biden signed into law a joint resolution of Congress, adopted under the Congressional Review Act, disapproving the August 2020 rule. The resolution reinstated the 2012 volatile organic compounds standards and the 2016 volatile organic compounds and methane standards for the oil and natural gas transmission and storage segments, as well as the methane standards for the production and processing segments of the oil and gas sector. On November 2, 2021, the EPA proposed rules that would reduce methane emissions from both new and existing sources in the oil and natural gas industry. The proposals would expand and strengthen emission reduction requirements for new, modified and reconstructed oil and natural gas sources and would require states to reduce methane emissions from existing sources nationwide. The EPA took comment on the proposed rules through January 31, 2022. The EPA issued a supplemental proposal in November 2022 to further strengthen emission reduction requirements and intends to finalize the rules by fall 2023. Until the rules are finalized, the relevant Registrants cannot determine the full impacts of the proposed rule.

61


Water Quality Standards

The Clean Water Act establishes the framework for maintaining and improving water quality in the U.S. through a program that conclusion could change. Asregulates, among other things, discharges to and withdrawals from waterways. The Clean Water Act requires that cooling water intake structures reflect the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" to aquatic organisms. After significant litigation, the EPA released a proposed rule under §316(b) of the Clean Water Act to regulate cooling water intakes at existing facilities. The final rule was released in May 2014 and became effective in October 2014. Under the final rule, existing facilities that withdraw at least 25% of their water exclusively for cooling purposes and have a design intake flow of greater than two million gallons per day are required to reduce fish impingement (i.e., when fish and other aquatic organisms are trapped against screens when water is drawn into a facility's cooling system) by choosing one of seven options. Facilities that withdraw at least 125 million gallons of water per day from waters of the U.S. must also conduct studies to help their permitting authority determine what site-specific controls, if any, would be required to reduce entrainment of aquatic organisms (i.e., when organisms are drawn into the facility). PacifiCorp's Dave Johnston generating facility and all of MidAmerican Energy's coal-fueled generating facilities, except Louisa, Ottumwa and Walter Scott, Jr. Unit 4, which have water cooling towers, withdraw more than 125 million gallons per day of water from waters of the U.S. for once-through cooling applications. PacifiCorp's Jim Bridger, Naughton, Gadsby, Hunter and Huntington generating facilities currently utilize closed cycle cooling towers but are designed to withdraw more than two million gallons of water per day. If PacifiCorp's or MidAmerican Energy's existing intake structures require modification, the costs are not anticipated to be significant to the consolidated financial statements. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are not impacted by the §316(b) final rule since they do not utilize once-through cooling water intake or discharge structures at any of their generating facilities.

In November 2015, the EPA published final effluent limitation guidelines and standards for the steam electric power generating sector which, among other things, regulate the discharge of bottom ash transport water, fly ash transport water, combustion residual leachate and non-chemical metal cleaning wastes. In November 2019, the EPA proposed updates to the 2015 rule, specifically addressing flue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash transport water. The rule took effect in December 2020. The final rule changes the technology-basis for treatment of flue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash transport water, revises the voluntary incentives program for flue gas desulfurization wastewater, and adds subcategories for high-flow units, low utilization units, and those that will transition away from coal combustion by 2028. While most of the issues raised by this rule are already being addressed through the CCR rule and are not expected to impose significant additional requirements, the Dave Johnston generating facility is impacted by the rule's bottom ash handling requirements at Units 1 and 2. The generating facility submitted notice to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality that it will either achieve a cessation of coal combustion at Units 1 and 2 by December 31, 2028, or install bottom ash transport treatment technology by December 31, 2025. The EPA anticipates proposing additional changes to the rule in spring 2023 to resolve outstanding issues from litigation.

In April 2014, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps of Engineers") issued a joint proposal to address "waters of the United States" to clarify protection under the Clean Water Act for streams and wetlands. The proposed rule comes as a result of U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2001 and 2006 that created confusion regarding jurisdictional waters that were subject to permitting under either nationwide or individual permitting requirements. The final rule was released in May 2015 but was appealed in multiple courts and a nationwide stay on the implementation of the rule was issued in October 2015. On June 9, 2021, the EPA and the Corps of Engineers announced their intention to again revise the definition of "waters of the United States." In December 2022, the agencies released a final rule updating the definition of "waters of the United States." The final rule generally restores and is broader than the pre-2015 "waters of the United States" definition and incorporates both the "relatively permanent" and "significant nexus" standards from U.S. Supreme Court decisions.

Coal Ash Disposal

In April 2015, the EPA released a final rule to regulate the management and disposal of coal combustion residuals (CCR) under the RCRA. The rule regulates coal combustion byproducts as non-hazardous waste under RCRA Subtitle D and establishes minimum nationwide standards for the disposal of CCR. Under the final rule, surface impoundments and landfills utilized for coal combustion byproducts will need to be closed unless they can meet the more stringent regulatory requirements.

62


At the time the rule was published in April 2015, PacifiCorp operated 18 surface impoundments and seven landfills that contained coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, nine surface impoundments and three landfills were either closed or repurposed to no longer receive coal combustion byproducts and hence are not subject to the final rule. As PacifiCorp proceeded to implement the final coal combustion rule, it was determined that two surface impoundments located at the Dave Johnston generating facility were hydraulically connected and effectively constitute a single impoundment. In November 2017, Tax Reform, future undistributed earningsa new surface impoundment was placed into service at the Naughton Generating Station. At the time the rule was published in April 2015, MidAmerican Energy owned or operated nine surface impoundments and four landfills that contain coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, MidAmerican Energy closed or repurposed six surface impoundments to no longer receive coal combustion byproducts. Five of these surface impoundments were closed on or before December 21, 2017, and the sixth is undergoing closure. At the time the rule was published in April 2015, the Nevada Utilities operated 10 evaporative surface impoundments and two landfills that contained coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, the Nevada Utilities closed four of the surface impoundments, four impoundments discontinued receipt of coal combustion byproducts making them inactive and two surface impoundments remain active and subject to the final rule. The two landfills remain active and subject to the final rule.

Multiple parties filed challenges over various aspects of the final rule in the D.C. Circuit, resulting in settlement of some of the issues and subsequent regulatory action by the EPA. The EPA finalized the first phase of the CCR rule amendments in July 2018 (the "Phase 1, Part 1 rule"). In addition to adopting alternative performance standards and revising groundwater performance standards for certain constituents, the EPA extended the deadline by which facilities must initiate closure of unlined ash ponds exceeding a groundwater protection standard and impoundments that do not meet the rule's aquifer location restrictions to October 31, 2020. Following submittal of competing motions from environmental groups and the EPA to stay or remand this deadline extension, on March 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit granted the EPA's request to remand the rule and left the October 31, 2020 deadline in place while the agency undertakes a new rulemaking establishing a new deadline for initiating closure. On August 14, 2019, the EPA released its "Phase 2" proposal, which contains targeted amendments to the CCR rule in response to court remands and EPA settlement agreements, as well as issues raised in a rulemaking petition. The Phase 2 rule has not been finalized. In February 2020, the EPA proposed a federal CCR permit program as required by the WIIN Act of 2016. The federal permit rule has not been finalized. In October 2020, the EPA released an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on legacy CCR surface impoundments, seeking comment on and information related to issues relevant to development of regulations for legacy impoundments. The EPA has not undertaken additional rulemaking related to the advanced notice. Until the proposals are finalized and fully litigated, the Registrants cannot determine whether additional action may be required.

In August 2020, the EPA finalized its Holistic Approach to Closure: Part A rule ("Part A rule"). This proposal addressed the D.C. Circuit's revocation of the provisions that allow unlined impoundments to continue receiving ash. The Part A rule established a new deadline of April 11, 2021, by which all unlined surface impoundments must initiate closure. The Part A rule also identifies two extensions to that date: (1) a site-specific extension to develop alternate disposal capacity and initiate closure by October 15, 2023; and (2) a site-specific extension for facilities that agree to shut down the coal-fueled unit and complete ash pond closure activities by October 17, 2028. PacifiCorp developed a demonstration for the development of alternative capacity for the Jim Bridger facility's FGD Pond 2 and a demonstration for closure of the Naughton facility and ash pond and submitted them to the EPA in November 2020. On January 11, 2022, the EPA deemed these submittals complete but has not taken additional action on them. No other Registrants used the provisions of the Part A rule.

Notwithstanding the status of the final CCR rule, citizens' suits have been filed against regulated entities seeking judicial relief for contamination alleged to have been caused by releases of coal combustion byproducts. Some of these cases have been successful in imposing liability upon companies if coal combustion byproducts contaminate groundwater that is ultimately released or connected to surface water. In addition, actions have been filed against regulated entities seeking to require that surface impoundments containing CCR be subject to closure by removal rather than being allowed to effectuate closure in place as provided under the final rule. The Registrants are not a party to these lawsuits and until they are resolved, the Registrants cannot predict the impact on overall compliance obligations.

63


Other

Other laws, regulations and agencies to which the relevant Registrants are subject include, but are not limited to:
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and similar state laws may require any current or former owners or operators of a disposal site, as well as transporters or generators of hazardous substances sent to such disposal site, to share in environmental remediation costs. Certain Registrants have been identified as potentially responsible parties in connection with certain disposal sites. The relevant Registrants have completed several cleanup actions and are participating in ongoing investigations and remedial actions. Costs associated with these actions are not expected to be material and are expected to be found prudent and included in rates.
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, under which the DOE is responsible for the selection and development of repositories for, and the permanent disposal of, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive wastes. Refer to Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements of MidAmerican Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding MidAmerican Energy's nuclear decommissioning obligations.
The federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and similar state statutes establish operational, reclamation and closure standards that must be met during and upon completion of PacifiCorp's mining activities.
The FERC evaluates hydroelectric systems to ensure environmental impacts are minimized, including the issuance of environmental impact statements for licensed projects both initially and upon relicensing. The FERC monitors the hydroelectric facilities for compliance with the license terms and conditions, which include environmental provisions. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding PacifiCorp's Klamath River hydroelectric system.

The Registrants expect they will be allowed to recover their respective prudently incurred costs to comply with the environmental laws and regulations discussed above. The Registrants' planning efforts take into consideration the complexity of balancing factors such as: (a) pending environmental regulations and requirements to reduce emissions, address waste disposal, ensure water quality and protect wildlife; (b) avoidance of excessive reliance on any one generation technology; (c) costs and trade-offs of various resource options including energy efficiency, demand response programs and renewable generation; (d) state-specific energy policies, resource preferences and economic development efforts; (e) additional transmission investment to reduce power costs and increase efficiency and reliability of the integrated transmission system; and (f) keeping rates affordable. Due to the number of generating units impacted by environmental regulations, deferring installation of compliance-related projects is often not feasible or cost effective and places the Registrants at risk of not having access to necessary capital, material, and labor while attempting to perform major equipment installations in a compressed timeframe concurrent with other utilities across the country. Therefore, the Registrants have established installation schedules with permitting agencies that coordinate compliance timeframes with construction and tie-in of major environmental compliance projects as units are scheduled off-line for planned maintenance outages; these coordinated efforts help reduce costs associated with replacement power and maintain system reliability.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Each Registrant is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described below. Careful consideration of these risks, together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K and the other public information filed by the relevant Registrant, should be made before making an investment decision. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or which each Registrant currently deems immaterial may also impair its business operations. Unless stated otherwise, the risks described below generally relate to each Registrant.

64


Corporate and Financial Structure Risks

BHE is a holding company and depends on distributions from subsidiaries, including joint ventures, to meet its obligations.

BHE is a holding company with no material assets other than the ownership interests in its subsidiaries and joint ventures, collectively referred to as its subsidiaries. Accordingly, cash flows and the ability to meet BHE's obligations are largely dependent upon the earnings of its subsidiaries and the payment of such earnings to BHE in the form of dividends or other distributions. BHE's subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay amounts due pursuant to BHE's senior debt, junior subordinated debt or its other obligations, or to make funds available, whether by dividends or other payments, for the payment of amounts due pursuant to BHE's senior debt, junior subordinated debt or its other obligations, and do not guarantee the payment of any of its obligations. Distributions from subsidiaries may also be limited by:
their respective earnings, capital requirements, and required debt and preferred stock payments;
the satisfaction of certain terms contained in financing, ring-fencing or organizational documents; and
regulatory restrictions that limit the ability of BHE's regulated utility subsidiaries to distribute profits.

BHE is substantially leveraged, the terms of its existing senior and junior subordinated debt do not restrict the incurrence of additional debt by BHE or its subsidiaries, and BHE's senior debt is structurally subordinated to the debt of its subsidiaries, and each of such factors could adversely affect BHE's consolidated financial results.

A significant portion of BHE's capital structure is comprised of debt, and BHE expects to incur additional debt in the future to fund items such as, among others, acquisitions, capital investments and the development and construction of new or expanded facilities. As of December 31, 2022, BHE had the following outstanding obligations:
senior unsecured debt of $14.0 billion;
junior subordinated debentures of $100 million;
guarantees and letters of credit in respect of subsidiaries, equity method investments and other related parties aggregating $1.6 billion; and

BHE's consolidated subsidiaries also have significant amounts of outstanding debt, which totaled $38.4 billion as of December 31, 2022. These amounts exclude (a) trade debt, (b) preferred stock obligations, (c) letters of credit in respect of subsidiary debt, and (d) BHE's share of the outstanding debt of its own or its subsidiaries' equity method investments.

Given BHE's substantial leverage, it may not have sufficient cash to service its debt, which could limit its ability to finance future acquisitions, develop and construct additional projects, or operate successfully under difficult conditions, including those brought on by adverse national and global economies, unfavorable financial markets or growth conditions where its capital needs may exceed its ability to fund them. BHE's leverage could also impair its credit quality or the credit quality of its subsidiaries, making it more difficult to finance operations or issue future debt on favorable terms, and could result in a downgrade in debt ratings by credit rating agencies.

The terms of BHE's and its subsidiaries' debt do not limit BHE's ability or the ability of its subsidiaries to incur additional debt or issue preferred stock. Accordingly, BHE or its subsidiaries could enter into acquisitions, new financings, refinancings, recapitalizations, leases or other highly leveraged transactions that could significantly increase BHE's or its subsidiaries' total amount of outstanding debt. The interest payments needed to service this increased level of debt could adversely affect BHE's or its subsidiaries' financial results. Many of BHE's subsidiaries' debt agreements contain covenants, or may in the future contain covenants, that restrict or limit, among other things, such subsidiaries' ability to create liens, sell assets, make certain distributions, incur additional debt or miss contractual deadlines or requirements, and BHE's ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond its control. Further, if an event of default accelerates a repayment obligation and such acceleration results in an event of default under some or all of BHE's other debt, BHE may not have sufficient funds to repay all of the accelerated debt simultaneously, and the other risks described under "Corporate and Financial Structure Risks" may be magnified as well.

65


Because BHE is a holding company, the claims of its senior debt holders are structurally subordinated with respect to the assets and earnings of its subsidiaries. Therefore, the rights of its creditors to participate in the assets of any subsidiary in the event of a liquidation or reorganization are subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors and preferred shareholders, if any. In addition, pursuant to separate financing agreements, substantially all of PacifiCorp's electric utility properties, MidAmerican Energy's electric utility properties in the state of Iowa, Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's properties in the state of Nevada, AltaLink's transmission properties, the equity interest of MidAmerican Funding's subsidiary and substantially all of the assets of the subsidiaries of BHE Renewables that are direct or indirect owners of solar and wind generation projects, are directly or indirectly pledged to secure their financings and, therefore, may be unavailable as potential sources of repayment of BHE's debt.

A downgrade in BHE's credit ratings or the credit ratings of its subsidiaries, including the Subsidiary Registrants, could negatively affect BHE's or its subsidiaries' access to capital, increase the cost of borrowing or raise energy transaction credit support requirements.

BHE's senior unsecured debt and its subsidiaries' long-term debt, including the Subsidiary Registrants, are rated by various rating agencies. BHE cannot give assurance that its senior unsecured debt rating or any of its subsidiaries' long-term debt ratings will not be reduced in the future. Although none of the Registrants' outstanding debt has rating-downgrade triggers that would accelerate a repayment obligation, a credit rating downgrade would increase any such Registrant's borrowing costs and commitment fees on its revolving credit agreements and other financing arrangements, perhaps significantly. In addition, such Registrant would likely be required to pay a higher interest rate in future financings, and the potential pool of investors and funding sources would likely decrease. Further, access to the commercial paper market could be significantly limited, resulting in higher interest costs.

Similarly, any downgrade or other event negatively affecting the credit ratings of BHE's subsidiaries could make their costs of borrowing higher or access to funding sources more limited, which in turn could cause BHE to provide liquidity in the form of capital contributions or loans to such subsidiaries, thus reducing its and its subsidiaries' liquidity and borrowing capacity.

Most of the Registrants' large wholesale customers, suppliers and counterparties require such Registrant to have sufficient creditworthiness in order to enter into transactions, particularly in the wholesale energy markets. If the credit ratings of a Registrant were to decline, especially below investment grade, the relevant Registrant's financing costs and borrowings would likely increase because certain counterparties may require collateral in the form of cash, a letter of credit or some other form of security for existing transactions and as a condition to entering into future transactions with such Registrant. Amounts could be material and could adversely affect such Registrant's liquidity and cash flows.

BHE's majority shareholder, Berkshire Hathaway, could exercise control over BHE in a manner that would benefit Berkshire Hathaway to the detriment of BHE's creditors and BHE could exercise control over the Subsidiary Registrants in a manner that would benefit BHE to the detriment of the Subsidiary Registrants' creditors and PacifiCorp'spreferred stockholders.

Berkshire Hathaway is majority owner of BHE and has control over all decisions requiring shareholder approval. In circumstances involving a conflict of interest between Berkshire Hathaway and BHE's creditors, Berkshire Hathaway could exercise its control in a manner that would benefit Berkshire Hathaway to the detriment of BHE's creditors.

BHE indirectly owns all of the common stock of PacifiCorp, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific and EGTS and the membership interest in Eastern Energy Gas. BHE is also the sole member of MidAmerican Funding and, accordingly, indirectly owns all of MidAmerican Energy's common stock. As a result, BHE has control over all decisions requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors. In circumstances involving a conflict of interest between BHE and the creditors of the Subsidiary Registrants, BHE could exercise its control in a manner that would benefit BHE to the detriment of the Subsidiary Registrants' creditors.

Business Risks

Much of BHE's growth has been achieved through acquisitions, and any such acquisition may not be successful.

Much of BHE's growth has been achieved through acquisitions. Future acquisitions may range from buying individual assets to the purchase of entire businesses. BHE will continue to investigate and pursue opportunities for future acquisitions that it believes, but cannot assure, may increase value and expand or complement existing businesses. BHE may participate in bidding or other negotiations at any time for such acquisition opportunities which may or may not be successful.

66


An acquisition could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of BHE's subsidiaries. In addition, the final orders of regulatory authorities approving acquisitions may be subject to appeal by third parties. The diversion of BHE management's attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the approval and integration of the acquired operations could adversely affect BHE's combined businesses and financial results and could impair its ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.

BHE cannot assure that future acquisitions, if any, or any integration efforts will be successful, or that BHE's ability to repay its obligations will not be adversely affected by any future acquisitions.

The Registrants are subject to operating uncertainties and events beyond each respective Registrant's control that impact the costs to operate, maintain, repair and replace utility and interstate natural gas pipeline systems and the ability to self-insure many risks, which could adversely affect each respective Registrant's financial results.

The operation of complex utility systems or interstate natural gas pipeline and storage systems that are spread over large geographic areas involves many operating uncertainties and events beyond each respective Registrant's control. These potential events include the breakdown or failure of the Registrants' thermal, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind and other electricity generating facilities and related equipment, compressors, pipelines, transmission and distribution lines and associated electric operations equipment or other equipment or processes, which could lead to catastrophic events; unscheduled outages; strikes, lockouts, other labor-related actions or shortages of qualified labor, including with respect to the Registrants' suppliers and vendors; transmission and distribution system constraints; failure to obtain, renew or maintain rights-of-way, easements and leases on U.S. federal, Native American, First Nations or tribal lands; terrorist activities or military or other actions, including cyber attacks; fuel shortages or interruptions; unavailability of critical equipment, materials and supplies; low water flows and other weather-related impacts; performance below expected levels of output, capacity or efficiency; operator error; third-party excavation errors; unexpected degradation of pipeline systems; design, construction or manufacturing defects; and catastrophic events such as severe storms, floods, fires, extreme temperature events, wind events, earthquakes, explosions, landslides, an electromagnetic pulse, mining incidents, costly litigation, wars, terrorism, pandemics and embargoes. A catastrophic event might result in injury or loss of life, extensive property damage, environmental or natural resource damages or excessive economic loss. For example, in the event of an uncontrolled release of water at one of PacifiCorp's high hazard potential hydroelectric dams, it is probable that loss of human life, disruption of lifeline facilities and property damage could occur in the downstream population and civil or other penalties could be imposed by the FERC. The extent of that liability would be determined by the applicable state law where any such damage occurred. Any of these events or other operational events could significantly reduce or eliminate the relevant Registrant's revenue or significantly increase its expenses, thereby reducing the availability of distributions to BHE. For example, if the relevant Registrant cannot operate its electricity or natural gas facilities at full capacity due to damage caused by a catastrophic event, its revenue could decrease and its expenses could increase due to the need to obtain energy from more expensive sources.

Further, the Registrants self-insure many risks, and current and future insurance coverage may not be sufficient to replace lost revenue or cover repair and replacement costs or other damages. The scope, cost and availability of each Registrant's insurance coverage may change, including the portion that is self-insured.

Any reduction of each Registrant's revenue or increase in its expenses resulting from the risks described above, could adversely affect the relevant Registrant's financial results.

The Registrants are subject to increasing risks from catastrophic wildfires and may be unable to obtain enough insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or at all and insurance coverage on existing wildfire claims could be insufficient to cover all losses should current estimates of those losses materially differ from the ultimate outcomes of the claims, all of which could materially affect the Registrants financial results and liquidity.

The risk of catastrophic and severe wildfires has increased in the western U.S. giving rise to the potential for large damage claims against utilities for fire-related losses. Catastrophic and severe wildfires can occur in PacifiCorp, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific's ("Western Domestic Utilities") service territories even when the Western Domestic Utilities effectively implement their wildfire mitigation plans and prudently manage their systems.

67


In California, for example, where PacifiCorp operates, "inverse condemnation" currently exposes utilities to potential liability for property damages where the utility's electrical equipment was a substantial cause of the wildfire. California courts have held that utilities can be held liable under inverse condemnation without being found negligent and regardless of fault. California law also permits inverse condemnation plaintiffs to recover attorney's fees. As a result of inverse condemnation being applied to utilities and wildfire damages, recent losses recorded by insurance companies, and the risk of an increase in the frequency, duration and size of wildfires, insurance for wildfire liabilities may not be available or may be available only at rates that are prohibitively expensive. In addition, even if insurance for wildfire liabilities is available, it may not be available in amounts necessary to cover potential losses. Uninsured losses and increases in the cost of insurance may be challenged when PacifiCorp seeks cost recovery and may not be recoverable in customer rates.

The Western Domestic Utilities monitor weather conditions with specific thresholds for designated high fire consequence areas to help ensure the safe and reliable operation of their systems during periods of elevated wildfire ignition risk. Should weather conditions become extreme, the Western Domestic Utilities may de-energize certain sections of their transmission and distribution facilities as a last resort to minimize risk to the public. These "public safety power shutoffs" could be subject to increased scrutiny by regulators and policy makers. And, although "public safety power shutoffs" are intended to minimize risk of wildfire ignition, de-energization may cause other damages for which the Western Domestic Utilities could be held liable.

Damage claims against PacifiCorp for wildfires may materially affect its financial condition and results of operations.

In September 2020, a severe weather event resulting in high winds, low humidity and warm temperatures contributed to several major wildfires, private and public property damages, personal injuries and loss of life and widespread power outages in Oregon and Northern California (the "2020 Wildfires"). Additionally, a major wildfire began in PacifiCorp's service territory in July 2022 causing private and public property damage, personal injuries, loss of life and power outages in Northern California (the "2022 McKinney Fire"). The wildfires spread across certain parts of PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas across multiple counties in Oregon and California. Investigations into the cause and origin of each wildfire are complex and ongoing. Several lawsuits and complaints have been filed in Oregon and California associated with the wildfires, and it is possible that additional lawsuits and complaints against PacifiCorp may be filed. If PacifiCorp is found liable for damages related to the 2020 Wildfires or the 2022 McKinney Fire and is unable to, or believes that it will be unable to, recover those damages through insurance or customer rates, or access the bank and capital markets on reasonable terms, PacifiCorp's financial results could be adversely affected. Refer to Item 3. Legal Proceedings, BHE's Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and PacifiCorp's Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire.

Each Registrant's business could be adversely affected by epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks.

Each Registrant's business could be adversely affected by epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks generally and more specifically in the markets in which we operate, including, without limitation, if each Registrant's utility customers experience decreases in demand for their products and services or otherwise reduce their consumption of electricity or natural gas that the respective Registrant supplies, or if such Registrant experiences material payment defaults by its customers. In addition, each Registrant's results and financial condition may be adversely affected by federal, state or local and foreign legislation related to such epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks (or other similar laws, regulations, orders or other governmental or regulatory actions) that would impose a moratorium on terminating electric or natural gas utility services, including related assessment of late fees, due to non-payment or other circumstances. Additionally, HomeServices' real estate businesses could experience a decline (which could be significant) in real estate transactions if potential customers elect to defer purchases in reaction to any epidemic, pandemic or other outbreak or due to general economic uncertainty such as high unemployment levels, in some or all of the real estate markets in which HomeServices operates. The government and regulators could impose other requirements on each Registrant's business that could have an adverse impact on such Registrant's financial results.

Further, epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks could disrupt supply chains (including supply chains for energy generation, steel or transmission wire) relating to the markets each Registrant serves, which could adversely impact such Registrant's ability to generate or supply power. In addition, such disruptions to the supply chain could delay certain construction and other capital expenditure projects, including construction and repowering of the Registrants' renewable generation projects. Such disruptions could adversely affect the impacted Registrant's future financial results.

Such declines in demand, any inability to generate or supply power or delays in capital projects could also significantly reduce cash flows at BHE's subsidiaries, thereby reducing the availability of distributions to BHE, which could adversely affect its financial results.

68


Each Registrant is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign legislation and regulation, including numerous environmental, health, safety, reliability, data privacy and other laws and regulations that affect its operations and costs. These laws and regulations are complex, dynamic and subject to new interpretations or change. In addition, new laws and regulations, including initiatives regarding deregulation and restructuring of the utility industry, are continually being proposed and enacted that impose new or revised requirements or standards on each Registrant.

Each Registrant is required to comply with numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations as described in "General Regulation" and "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K that have broad application to each Registrant and limits the respective Registrant's ability to independently make and implement management decisions regarding, among other items, acquiring businesses; constructing, acquiring, disposing or retiring operating assets; operating and maintaining generating facilities and transmission and distribution system assets; complying with pipeline safety and integrity and environmental requirements; setting rates charged to customers; establishing capital structures and issuing debt or equity securities; managing and reporting transactions between subsidiaries and affiliates; and paying dividends or similar distributions. These laws and regulations, which are followed in developing the Registrants' safety and compliance programs and procedures, are implemented and enforced by federal, state and local regulatory agencies, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the FERC, the EPA, the DOT, the NRC, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration and various state regulatory commissions in the U.S., and by foreign regulatory agencies, such as GEMA, which discharges certain of its powers through its staff within Ofgem, in Great Britain and the AUC in Alberta, Canada.

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations generally requires each Registrant to obtain and comply with a wide variety of licenses, permits, inspections, audits and other approvals. Further, compliance with laws and regulations can require significant capital and operating expenditures, including expenditures for new equipment, inspection, cleanup costs, removal and remediation costs and damages arising out of contaminated properties. Compliance activities pursuant to existing or new laws and regulations could be prohibitively expensive or otherwise uneconomical. As a result, each Registrant could be required to shut down some facilities or materially alter its operations. Further, each Registrant may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental or other regulatory approvals and permits for its operating assets or development projects. Delays in, or active opposition by third parties to, obtaining any required environmental or regulatory authorizations or failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the authorizations may increase costs or prevent or delay each Registrant from operating its facilities, developing or favorably locating new facilities or expanding existing facilities. If any Registrant fails to comply with any environmental or other regulatory requirements, such Registrant may be subject to penalties and fines or other sanctions, including changes to the way its electricity generating facilities are operated that may adversely impact generation or how the Pipeline Companies are permitted to operate their systems that may adversely impact throughput. The costs of complying with laws and regulations could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results. Not being able to operate existing facilities or develop new generating facilities to meet customer electricity needs could require such Registrant to increase its purchases of electricity on the wholesale market, which could increase market and price risks and adversely affect such Registrant's financial results.

Existing laws and regulations, while comprehensive, are subject to changes and revisions from ongoing policy initiatives by legislators and regulators and to interpretations that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. For example, changes in laws and regulations could result in, but are not limited to, increased competition and decreased revenue within each Registrant's service territories; new environmental requirements, including the implementation of or changes to the Affordable Clean Energy rule, RPS and GHG emissions reduction goals; the issuance of new or stricter air quality standards; the implementation of energy efficiency mandates; the issuance of regulations governing the management and disposal of coal combustion byproducts; changes in forecasting requirements; changes to each Registrant's service territories as a result of condemnation or takeover by municipalities or other governmental entities, particularly where it lacks the exclusive right to serve its customers; the inability of each Registrant to recover its costs on a timely basis, if at all; new pipeline safety requirements; or a negative impact on each Registrant's current cost recovery arrangements. In addition to changes in existing legislation and regulation, new laws and regulations are likely to be enacted from time to time that impose additional or new requirements or standards on each Registrant. For example, in April 2022, the EPA proposed the "Cross-State Ozone Transport Rule", which contains requirements intended to address ozone transport between states through federally required nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fuel generating facilities. The rule included Wyoming, Utah and Nevada for the first time. If finalized as proposed, the rule will have impacts on PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities in both Utah and Wyoming that do not have an SCR as early as 2026 and threatens early coal-fueled unit retirements and reliability impacts. PacifiCorp has engaged with state and federal agencies to make adjustments to the rule and mitigate potential reliability impacts. Adverse rulings in GHG-related cases could result in increased or changed regulations and could increase costs for GHG emitters, including the Registrants' generating facilities. The GHG rules, changes to those rules, and the Registrants' compliance requirements are subject to potential outcomes from proceedings and litigation challenging the rules.

69


New federal, regional, state and international accords, legislation, regulation, or judicial proceedings limiting GHG emissions could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants, the U.S. and the global economy. Companies and industries with higher GHG emissions, such as utilities with significant coal-fueled generating facilities, will be subject to more direct impacts and greater financial and regulatory risks. The impact is dependent on numerous factors, none of which can be meaningfully quantified at this time. These factors include, but are not limited to, the magnitude and timing of GHG emissions reduction requirements; the design of the requirements; the cost, availability and effectiveness of emissions control technology; the price, distribution method and availability of offsets and allowances used for compliance; government-imposed compliance costs; and the existence and nature of incremental cost recovery mechanisms. Examples of how new requirements may impact the Registrants include:

Additional costs may be incurred to purchase required emissions allowances under any market-based cap-and-trade system in excess of allocations that are received at no cost. These purchases would be necessary until new technologies could be developed and deployed to reduce emissions or lower carbon generation is available;
Acquiring and renewing construction and operating permits for new and existing generating facilities may be costly and difficult;
Additional costs may be incurred to purchase and deploy new generating technologies;
Costs may be incurred to retire existing coal-fueled generating facilities before the end of their otherwise useful lives or to convert them to burn fuels, such as natural gas or biomass, that result in lower emissions;
Operating costs may be higher and generating unit outputs may be lower;
Higher interest and financing costs and reduced access to capital markets may result to the extent that financial markets view climate change and GHG emissions as a greater business risk; and
The relevant Registrant's natural gas pipeline operations and capacity sales, electric transmission and retail sales may be impacted in response to changes in customer demand and requirements to reduce GHG emissions.

The impact of events or conditions caused by climate change, whether from natural processes or human activities, are uncertain and could vary widely, from highly localized to worldwide, and the extent to which a utility's operations may be affected is uncertain. Climate change may cause physical and financial risks through, among other things, sea level rise, changes in precipitation and extreme weather events. Consumer demand for energy may increase or decrease, based on overall changes in weather and as customers promote lower energy consumption through the continued use of energy efficiency programs or other means. Availability of resources to generate electricity, such as water for hydroelectric production and cooling purposes, may also be impacted by climate change and could influence the Registrants' existing and future electricity generating portfolio. These issues may have a direct impact on the costs of electricity production and increase the price customers pay or their demand for electricity.

Implementing actions required under, and otherwise complying with, new federal and state laws and regulations and changes in existing ones are among the most challenging aspects of managing utility operations. The Registrants cannot accurately predict the type or scope of future laws and regulations that may be enacted, changes in existing ones or new interpretations by agency orders or court decisions, nor can each Registrant determine their impact on it at this time; however, any one of these could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results through higher capital expenditures and operating costs, early closure of generating facilities or lower tax benefits or restrict or otherwise cause an adverse change in how each Registrant operates its business. To the extent that each Registrant is not allowed by its regulators to recover or cannot otherwise recover the costs to comply with new laws and regulations or changes in existing ones, the costs of complying with such additional requirements could have a material adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's financial results. Additionally, even if such costs are recoverable in rates, if they are substantial and result in rates increasing to levels that substantially reduce customer demand, this could have a material adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's financial results.

Recovery of costs and certain activities by each Registrant is subject to regulatory review and approval, and the inability to recover costs or undertake certain activities may adversely affect each Registrant's financial results.

State Regulatory Rate Review Proceedings

The Utilities establish rates for their regulated retail service through state regulatory proceedings. These proceedings typically involve multiple parties, including government bodies and officials, consumer advocacy groups and various consumers of energy, who have differing concerns but generally have the common objective of limiting rate increases or requesting rate decreases while also requiring the Utilities to ensure system reliability. Decisions are subject to judicial appeal, potentially leading to further uncertainty associated with the approval proceedings.
70


States set retail rates based in part upon the state regulatory commission's acceptance of an allocated share of total utility costs. When states adopt different methods to calculate interjurisdictional cost allocations, some costs may not be incorporated into rates of any state or other jurisdiction. Ratemaking is also generally done on the basis of estimates of normalized costs, so if a given year's realized costs are higher than normalized costs, rates may not be sufficient to cover those costs. In some cases, actual costs are lower than the normalized or estimated costs recovered through rates and from time-to-time may result in a state regulator requiring refunds to customers. Each state regulatory commission generally sets rates based on a test year established in accordance with that commission's policies. The test year data adopted by each state regulatory commission may create a lag between the incurrence of a cost and its recovery in rates. Each state regulatory commission also decides the allowed levels of expense, investment and capital structure that it deems are prudently incurred in providing the service and may disallow recovery in rates for any costs that it believes do not meet such standard. Additionally, each state regulatory commission establishes the allowed rate of return the Utilities will be given an opportunity to earn on their sources of capital. While rate regulation is premised on providing a fair opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, the state regulatory commissions do not guarantee that each Registrant will be able to realize the allowed rate of return or recover all of its costs even if it believes such costs to be prudently incurred.

Some state regulatory commissions have authorized recovery of certain costs above the level assumed in establishing base rates through adjustment mechanisms, which may be subject to customer sharing. Any significant increase in fuel costs for electricity generation or purchased electricity costs could have a negative impact on the Utilities, despite efforts to minimize this impact through the use of hedging contracts and adjustment mechanisms or through future general regulatory rate reviews. Any of these consequences could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results.

FERC Jurisdiction

The FERC authorizes cost-based rates associated with transmission services provided by the Utilities' transmission facilities. Under the Federal Power Act, the Utilities, or MISO as it relates to MidAmerican Energy, may voluntarily file, or may be obligated to file, for changes, including general rate changes, to their system-wide transmission service rates. General rate changes implemented may be subject to refund. The FERC also has responsibility for approving both cost- and market-based rates under which the Utilities sell electricity in the wholesale market, has jurisdiction over most of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities and has broad jurisdiction over energy markets. The FERC may impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address some of the volatility of these markets or could revoke or restrict the ability of the Utilities to sell electricity at market-based rates, which could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results. The FERC also maintains rules concerning standards of conduct, affiliate restrictions, interlocking directorates and cross-subsidization. As a transmission owning member of MISO, MidAmerican Energy is also subject to MISO-directed modifications of market rules, which are subject to FERC approval and operational procedures. As participants in EIM, PacifiCorp, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are also subject to applicable California ISO rules, which are subject to FERC approval and operational procedures. The FERC may also impose substantial civil penalties for any non-compliance with the Federal Power Act and the FERC's rules and orders.

The NERC has standards in place to ensure the reliability of the electric generation system and transmission grid. The Utilities are subject to the NERC's regulations and periodic audits to ensure compliance with those regulations. The NERC may carry out enforcement actions for non-compliance and administer significant financial penalties, subject to the FERC's review.

The FERC has jurisdiction over, among other things, the construction, abandonment, modification and operation of natural gas pipelines and related facilities used in the transportation, storage and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce, including all rates, charges and terms and conditions of service. The FERC also has market transparency authority and has adopted additional reporting and internet posting requirements for natural gas pipelines and buyers and sellers of natural gas.

Rates for the interstate natural gas transmission and storage operations at the Pipeline Companies, which include reservation, commodity, surcharges, fuel and gas lost and unaccounted for charges, are authorized by the FERC. In accordance with the FERC's ratemaking principles, the Pipeline Companies' current maximum tariff rates are designed to recover prudently incurred costs included in their pipeline system's regulatory cost of service that are associated with the construction, operation and maintenance of their pipeline system and to afford the Pipeline Companies an opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return. Nevertheless, the rates the FERC authorizes the Pipeline Companies to charge their customers may not be sufficient to recover the costs incurred to provide services in any given period. Moreover, from time to time, the FERC may change, alter or refine its policies or methodologies for establishing pipeline rates and terms and conditions of service. In addition, the FERC has the authority under Section 5 of the Natural Gas Act of 1938 ("NGA") to investigate whether a pipeline may be earning more than its allowed rate of return and, when appropriate, to institute proceedings against such pipeline to prospectively reduce rates. Any such proceedings, if instituted, could result in significantly adverse rate decreases.

71


Under FERC policy, interstate pipelines and their customers may execute contracts at negotiated rates, which may be above or below the maximum tariff rate for that service or the pipeline may agree to provide a discounted rate, which would be a rate between the maximum and minimum tariff rates. In a rate proceeding, rates in these contracts are generally not subject to adjustment. It is possible that the cost to perform services under negotiated or discounted rate contracts will exceed the cost used in the determination of the negotiated or discounted rates, which could result either in losses or lower rates of return for providing such services. Under certain circumstances, FERC policy allows interstate natural gas pipelines to design new maximum tariff rates to recover such costs in regulatory rate reviews. However, with respect to discounts granted to affiliates, the interstate natural gas pipeline must demonstrate that the discounted rate was necessary in order to meet competition.

GEMA Jurisdiction

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, as DNOs and holders of electricity distribution licenses, are subject to regulation by GEMA. Most of the revenue of a DNO is controlled by a distribution price control formula set out in the electricity distribution license. The price control formula does not directly constrain profits from year-to-year but is a control on revenue that operates independent of a significant portion of the DNO's actual costs. A resetting of the formula does not require the consent of the DNO, but if a licensee disagrees with a change to its license, it can appeal the matter to the United Kingdom's CMA. GEMA is able to impose financial penalties on DNOs that contravene any of their electricity distribution license duties or certain of their duties under British law or fail to achieve satisfactory performance of individual standards prescribed by GEMA. Any penalty imposed must be reasonable and may not exceed 10% of the DNO's revenue. During the term of any price control, additional costs have a direct impact on the financial results of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies.

AUC Jurisdiction

The AUC is an independent, quasi-judicial agency established by the province of Alberta, Canada, which is responsible for, among other things, approving the tariffs of transmission facility owners, including AltaLink, and distribution utilities, acquisitions of such transmission facility owners or utilities, and construction and operation of new transmission projects in Alberta. The AUC also investigates and rules on regulated rate disputes and system access problems.

The AUC regulates and oversees Alberta's electricity transmission sector with broad authority that may impact many of AltaLink's activities, including its tariffs, rates, construction, operations and financing. The AUC has various core functions in regulating the Alberta electricity transmission sector, including the following:
regulating and adjudicating issues related to the operation of electric utilities within Alberta;
processing and approving general tariff applications relating to revenue requirements, capital expenditure prudency and rates of return including deemed capital structure for regulated utilities while ensuring that utility rates are just and reasonable and approval of the transmission tariff rates of regulated transmission providers paid by the AESO, which is the independent transmission system operator in Alberta, Canada that controls the operation of AltaLink's transmission system;
approving the need for new electricity transmission facilities and permits to build and licenses to operate electricity transmission facilities;
reviewing operations and accounts from electric utilities and conducting on-site inspections to ensure compliance with industry regulations and standards;
adjudicating enforcement issues including the imposition of administrative penalties that arise when market participants violate the rules of the AESO; and
collecting, storing, analyzing, appraising and disseminating information to effectively fulfill its duties as an industry regulator.

In addition, AUC approval is required in connection with new energy and regulated utility initiatives in Alberta, amendments to existing approvals and financing proposals by designated utilities.

72


Physical or cyber attacks, both threatened and actual, could impact each Registrant's operations and could adversely affect its financial results.

Each Registrant relies on technology in virtually all aspects of its business. Like those of many large businesses, certain of the Registrant's technology systems have been subject to computer viruses, malicious codes, unauthorized access, phishing efforts, denial-of-service attacks and other cyber attacks and each Registrant expects to be subject to similar attacks in the future as such attacks become more sophisticated and frequent. A significant disruption or failure of its technology systems by physical or cyber attack could result in service interruptions, safety failures, security events, regulatory compliance failures, an inability to protect information and assets against unauthorized users, and other operational difficulties. Attacks perpetrated against each Registrant's systems could result in loss of assets and critical information and expose it to remediation costs and reputational damage.

Although the Registrants have taken steps intended to mitigate these risks, a significant disruption or cyber intrusion at one or more of each Registrant's operations could adversely affect the impacted Registrant's financial results. Cyber attacks could further adversely affect each Registrant's ability to operate facilities, information technology and business systems, or compromise sensitive customer and employee information. In addition, physical or cyber attacks against key suppliers or service providers could have a similar effect on each Registrant. Additionally, if each Registrant is unable to acquire, develop, implement, adopt or protect rights around new technology, it may suffer a competitive disadvantage.

Each Registrant is actively pursuing, developing and constructing new or expanded facilities, the completion and expected costs of which are subject to significant risk, and each Registrant has significant funding needs related to its planned capital expenditures.

Each Registrant actively pursues, develops and constructs new or expanded facilities. Each Registrant expects to incur significant annual capital expenditures over the next several years. Such expenditures may include construction and other costs for new electricity generating facilities, electric transmission or distribution projects, environmental control and compliance systems, natural gas storage facilities, new or expanded pipeline systems, and continued maintenance and upgrades of existing assets.

Development and construction of major facilities are subject to substantial risks, including fluctuations in the price and availability of commodities, manufactured goods, equipment, and the imposition of tariffs thereon when sourced by foreign providers, labor, siting and permitting and changes in environmental and operational compliance matters, load forecasts and other items over a multi-year construction period, as well as counterparty risk and the economic viability of the Registrants' suppliers, customers and contractors. Certain of the Registrants' construction projects are substantially dependent upon a single supplier or contractor and replacement of such supplier or contractor may be difficult and cannot be assured. These risks may result in the inability to timely complete a project or higher than expected costs to complete an asset and place it in-service and, in extreme cases, the loss of the power purchase agreements or other long-term off-take contracts underlying such projects. Such costs may not be recoverable in the regulated rates or market or contract prices each Registrant is able to charge its customers. Delays in construction of renewable projects may result in delayed in-service dates which may result in the loss of anticipated revenue or income tax benefits. It is also possible that additional generation needs may be obtained through power purchase agreements, which could increase long-term purchase obligations and force reliance on the operating performance of a third party. The inability to successfully and timely complete a project, avoid unexpected costs or recover any such costs could adversely affect such Registrant's financial results.

Furthermore, each Registrant depends upon both internal and external sources of liquidity to provide working capital and to fund capital requirements. If BHE does not provide needed funding to its subsidiaries and the subsidiaries are unable to obtain funding from external sources, they may need to postpone or cancel planned capital expenditures.

A significant sustained decrease in demand for electricity or natural gas in the markets served by each Registrant would decrease its operating revenue, could impact its planned capital expenditures and could adversely affect its financial results.

A significant sustained decrease in demand for electricity or natural gas in the markets served by each Registrant would decrease its operating revenue, could impact its planned capital expenditures and could adversely affect its financial results. Factors that could lead to a decrease in market demand include, among others:
a depression, recession or other adverse economic condition that results in a lower level of economic activity or reduced spending by consumers on electricity or natural gas;
an increase in the market price of electricity or natural gas or a decrease in the price of other competing forms of energy;
73


shifts in competitively priced natural gas supply sources away from the sources connected to the Pipeline Companies' systems, including shale gas sources;
efforts by customers, legislators and regulators to reduce the consumption of electricity generated or distributed by each Registrant through various existing laws and regulations, as well as, deregulation, conservation, energy efficiency and private generation measures and programs;
laws mandating or encouraging renewable energy sources, which may decrease the demand for electricity and natural gas or change the market prices of these commodities;
higher fuel taxes or other governmental or regulatory actions that increase, directly or indirectly, the cost of natural gas or other fuel sources for electricity generation or that limit the use of natural gas or the generation of electricity from fossil fuels;
a shift to more energy-efficient or alternative fuel machinery or an improvement in fuel economy, whether as a result of technological advances by manufacturers, legislation mandating higher fuel economy or lower emissions, price differentials, incentives or otherwise;
a reduction in the state or federal subsidies or tax incentives that are provided to agricultural, industrial or other customers, or a significant sustained change in prices for commodities such as ethanol or corn for ethanol manufacturers; and
sustained mild weather that reduces heating or cooling needs.

Each Registrant's operating results may fluctuate on a seasonal and quarterly basis and may be adversely affected by weather.

In most parts of the U.S. and other markets in which each Registrant operates, demand for electricity peaks during the summer months when irrigation and cooling needs are higher. Market prices for electricity also generally peak at that time. In other areas, including the western portion of PacifiCorp's service territory, demand for electricity peaks during the winter when heating needs are higher. In addition, demand for natural gas and other fuels generally peaks during the winter. This is especially true in MidAmerican Energy's and Sierra Pacific's retail natural gas businesses. Further, extreme weather conditions, such as heat waves, winter storms or floods could cause these seasonal fluctuations to be more pronounced. Periods of low rainfall or snowpack may negatively impact electricity generation at PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities, which may result in greater purchases of electricity from the wholesale market or from other sources at market prices. Additionally, PacifiCorp and MidAmerican Energy have added substantial wind-powered generating capacity, and BHE's unregulated subsidiaries are adding solar-powered and wind-powered generating capacity, each of which is also a climate-dependent resource.

As a result, the overall financial results of each Registrant may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal and quarterly basis. Each Registrant has historically provided less service, and consequently earned less income, when weather conditions are mild. Unusually mild weather in the future may adversely affect each Registrant's financial results through lower revenue or margins. Conversely, unusually extreme weather conditions could increase each Registrant's costs to provide services and could adversely affect its financial results. The extent of fluctuation in each Registrant's financial results may change depending on a number of factors related to its regulatory environment and contractual agreements, including its ability to recover energy costs, the existence of revenue sharing provisions as it relates to MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, and terms of its wholesale sale contracts.

74


Each Registrant is subject to market risk associated with the wholesale energy markets, which could adversely affect its financial results.

In general, each Registrant's primary market risk is adverse fluctuations in the market price of wholesale electricity and fuel, including natural gas, coal and fuel oil, which is compounded by volumetric changes affecting the availability of or demand for electricity and fuel. The market price of wholesale electricity may be influenced by several factors, such as the adequacy or type of generating capacity, scheduled and unscheduled outages of generating facilities, prices and availability of fuel sources for generation, disruptions or constraints to transmission and distribution facilities, weather conditions, demand for electricity, economic growth and changes in technology. Volumetric changes are caused by fluctuations in generation or changes in customer needs that can be due to the weather, electricity and fuel prices, the economy, regulations or customer behavior. For example, the Utilities purchase electricity and fuel in the open market as part of their normal operating businesses. If market prices rise, especially in a time when larger than expected volumes must be purchased at market prices, the Utilities may incur significantly greater expenses than anticipated. Likewise, if electricity market prices decline in a period when the Utilities are a net seller of electricity in the wholesale market, the Utilities could earn less revenue. Although the Utilities have ECAMs, the risks associated with changes in market prices may not be fully mitigated due to customer sharing bands as it relates to PacifiCorp and other factors.

Potential terrorist activities and the impact of military or other actions, including sanctions, export controls and similar measures, could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results.

The ongoing threat of terrorism and the impact of military or other actions by nations or politically, ethnically or religiously motivated organizations regionally or globally may create increased political, economic, social and financial market instability, which could subject each Registrant's operations to increased risks. Additionally, the U.S. government has issued warnings that energy assets, specifically pipeline, nuclear generation, transmission and other electric utility infrastructure, are potential targets for terrorist attacks. Further, the potential or actual outbreak of war or other hostilities, such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and the resulting economic sanctions on Russia and the sale of Russian natural gas and petroleum, as well as the existing and potential further responses from Russia or other countries to such sanctions and military actions, could adversely affect global and regional economies and financial markets. For instance, the current ban on imports of Russian oil, liquefied natural gas and coal to the U.S. could contribute to increases in prices for such commodities in the U.S. and elsewhere which could adversely affect each Registrant's business. Further, each Registrant's business must be conducted in compliance with applicable economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations, including those administered and enforced by the U.S. Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the United Nations Security Council and other relevant governmental authorities in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom and European Union, which include sanctions that could potentially restrict or prohibit each Registrant's relationships with certain suppliers and customers. Political, economic, social or financial market instability or damage to or interference with the operating assets of the Registrants, customers or suppliers, or continued increases in the price of natural gas and other petroleum commodities may result in business interruptions, lost revenue, higher costs, disruption in fuel supplies, lower energy consumption and unstable markets, particularly with respect to electricity and natural gas, and increased security, repair or other costs, any of which may materially adversely affect each Registrant in ways that cannot be predicted at this time. Any of these risks could materially affect BHE's consolidated financial results. Furthermore, instability in the financial markets as a result of terrorism or war could also materially adversely affect each Registrant's ability to raise capital.

75


Certain Registrants are subject to the unique risks associated with nuclear generation.

The ownership and operation of nuclear generating facilities, such as MidAmerican Energy's 25% ownership interest in Quad Cities Station, involves certain risks. These risks include, among other items, mechanical or structural problems, inadequacy or lapses in maintenance protocols, the impairment of reactor operation and safety systems due to human error, the costs of storage, handling and disposal of nuclear materials, compliance with and changes in regulation of nuclear generating facilities, limitations on the amounts and types of insurance coverage commercially available, and uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear facilities at the end of their useful lives. Additionally, Constellation Energy, the 75% owner and operator of the facility, may respond to the occurrence of any of these or other risks in a manner that negatively impacts MidAmerican Energy, including closure of Quad Cities Station prior to the expiration of its operating license. The prolonged unavailability, or early closure, of Quad Cities Station due to operational or economic factors could have a materially adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's financial results, particularly when the cost to produce power at the generating facility is significantly less than market wholesale prices. The following are among the more significant of these risks:
Operational Risk - Operations at any nuclear generating facility could degrade to the point where the generating facility would have to be shut down. If such degradations were to occur, the process of identifying and correcting the causes of the operational downgrade to return the generating facility to operation could require significant time and expenses, resulting in both lost revenue and increased fuel and purchased electricity costs to meet supply commitments. Rather than incurring substantial costs to restart the generating facility, the generating facility could be shut down. Furthermore, a shut-down or failure at any other nuclear generating facility could cause regulators to require a shut-down or reduced availability at Quad Cities Station.
In addition, issues relating to the disposal of nuclear waste material, including the availability, unavailability and expenses of a permanent repository for spent nuclear fuel could adversely impact operations as well as the cost and ability to decommission nuclear generating facilities, including Quad Cities Station, in the future.

Regulatory Risk - The NRC may modify, suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply with applicable Atomic Energy Act regulations or the terms of the licenses of nuclear facilities. Unless extended, the NRC operating licenses for Quad Cities Station will expire in 2032. Changes in regulations by the NRC could require a substantial increase in capital expenditures or result in increased operating or decommissioning costs.

Nuclear Accident and Catastrophic Risks - Accidents and other unforeseen catastrophic events have occurred at nuclear facilities other than Quad Cities Station, both in the U.S. and elsewhere, such as at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear generating facility in Japan as a result of the earthquake and tsunami in March 2011. The consequences of an accident or catastrophic event can be severe and include loss of life and property damage. Any resulting liability from a nuclear accident or catastrophic event could exceed the relevant Registrant's resources, including insurance coverage.

Certain of BHE's subsidiaries are subject to the risk that customers will not renew their contracts or that BHE's subsidiaries will be unable to obtain new customers for expanded capacity, each of which could adversely affect its financial results.

If BHE's subsidiaries are unable to renew, remarket, or find replacements for their customer agreements on favorable terms, BHE's subsidiaries' sales volumes and operating revenue would be exposed to reduction and increased volatility. For example, without the benefit of long-term transportation agreements, BHE cannot assure that the Pipeline Companies will be able to transport natural gas at efficient capacity levels. Substantially all of the Pipeline Companies' revenue is generated under transportation, storage and LNG contracts that periodically must be renegotiated and extended or replaced, and the Pipeline Companies are dependent upon relatively few customers for a substantial portion of their revenue. Similarly, without long-term power purchase agreements, BHE cannot assure that its unregulated power generators will be able to operate profitably. Failure to maintain existing long-term agreements or secure new long-term agreements, or being required to discount rates significantly upon renewal or replacement, could adversely affect BHE's consolidated financial results. The replacement of any existing long-term agreements depends on market conditions and other factors that may be beyond BHE's subsidiaries' control.

76


Each Registrant is subject to counterparty risk, which could adversely affect its financial results.

Each Registrant is subject to counterparty credit risk related to contractual payment obligations with wholesale suppliers and customers. Adverse economic conditions or other events affecting counterparties with whom each Registrant conducts business could impair the ability of these counterparties to meet their payment obligations. Each Registrant depends on these counterparties to remit payments on a timely basis. Each Registrant continues to monitor the creditworthiness of its wholesale suppliers and customers in an attempt to reduce the impact of any potential counterparty default. If strategies used to minimize these risk exposures are ineffective or if any Registrant's wholesale suppliers' or customers' financial condition deteriorates or they otherwise become unable to pay, it could have a significant adverse impact on each Registrant's liquidity and its financial results.

Each Registrant is subject to counterparty performance risk related to performance of contractual obligations by wholesale suppliers, customers and contractors. Each Registrant relies on wholesale suppliers to deliver commodities, primarily natural gas, coal and electricity, in accordance with short- and long-term contracts. Failure or delay by suppliers to provide these commodities pursuant to existing contracts could disrupt the delivery of electricity and require the Utilities to incur additional expenses to meet customer needs. In addition, when these contracts terminate, the Utilities may be unable to purchase the commodities on terms equivalent to the terms of current contracts.

Each Registrant relies on wholesale customers to take delivery of the energy they have committed to purchase. Failure of customers to take delivery may require the relevant Registrant to find other customers to take the energy at lower prices than the original customers committed to pay. If each Registrant's wholesale customers are unable to fulfill their obligations, there may be a significant adverse impact on its financial results.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' customers are concentrated in a small number of electricity supply businesses with E.ON and British Gas Trading Limited accounting for approximately 22% and 14%, respectively, of distribution revenue in 2022. AltaLink's primary source of operating revenue is the AESO. Generally, a single customer purchases the energy from BHE's independent power projects in the U.S. pursuant to long-term power purchase agreements. For example, certain of BHE Renewables' solar and wind independent power projects sell all of their electrical production to either PG&E or SCE, respectively. Any material payment or other performance failure by the counterparties in these arrangements could have a significant adverse impact on BHE's consolidated financial results.

BHE owns investments in foreign countries that are exposed to risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and increased economic, regulatory and political risks.

BHE's business operations and investments outside the U.S. increase its risk related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the British pound and the Canadian dollar. BHE's principal reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, and the value of the assets and liabilities, earnings, cash flows and potential distributions from its foreign operations changes with the fluctuations of the currency in which they transact. BHE may selectively reduce some foreign currency exchange rate risk by, among other things, requiring contracted amounts be settled in, or indexed to, U.S. dollars or a currency freely convertible into U.S. dollars, or hedging through foreign currency derivatives. These efforts, however, may not be effective and could negatively affect BHE's consolidated financial results.

In addition to any disruption in the global financial markets, the economic, regulatory and political conditions in some of the countries where BHE has operations or is pursuing investment opportunities may present increased risks related to, among others, inflation, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, currency repatriation restrictions, nationalization, renegotiation, privatization, availability of financing on suitable terms, customer creditworthiness, construction delays, business interruption, political instability, civil unrest, guerilla activity, terrorism, pandemics (including potentially in relation to COVID-19 variants), expropriation, trade sanctions, contract nullification and changes in law, regulations or tax policy. BHE may not choose to or be capable of either fully insuring against or effectively hedging these risks.

77


Poor performance of plan and fund investments and other factors impacting the pension and other postretirement benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning and mine reclamation trust funds could unfavorably impact each Registrant's cash flows, liquidity and financial results.

Costs of providing each Registrant's defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans and costs associated with the joint trustee plan to which PacifiCorp contributes depend upon a number of factors, including the rates of return on plan assets, the level and nature of benefits provided, discount rates, mortality assumptions, the interest rates used to measure required minimum funding levels, the funded status of the plans, changes in benefit design, tax deductibility and funding limits, changes in laws and government regulation and each Registrant's required or voluntary contributions made to the plans. Furthermore, the timing of recognition of unrecognized gains and losses associated with the Registrants' defined benefit pension plans is subject to volatility due to events that may give rise to settlement accounting. Settlement events resulting from lump sum distributions offered by certain of the Registrants' defined benefit pension plans are influenced by the interest rates used to discount a participant's lump sum distribution. When the applicable interest rates are low, lump sum distributions in a given year tend to increase resulting in a higher likelihood of triggering settlement accounting.

If the Registrant's pension and other postretirement benefit plans are in underfunded positions, the respective Registrant may be required to make cash contributions to fund such underfunded plans in the future. Additionally, each Registrant's plans have investments in domestic and foreign equity and debt securities and other investments that are subject to loss. Losses from investments could add to the volatility, size and timing of future contributions.

Furthermore, the funded status of the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan multiemployer plan to which PacifiCorp's subsidiary previously contributed is considered critical and declining. PacifiCorp's subsidiary involuntarily withdrew from the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan in June 2015 when the UMWA employees ceased performing work for the subsidiary. PacifiCorp has recorded its best estimate of the withdrawal obligation.

In addition, MidAmerican Energy is required to fund over time the projected costs of decommissioning Quad Cities Station, a nuclear generating facility, and Bridger Coal Company, a joint venture of PacifiCorp's subsidiary, Pacific Minerals, Inc., is required to fund projected mine reclamation costs. The funds that MidAmerican Energy has invested in a nuclear decommissioning trust and a subsidiary of PacifiCorp has invested in a mine reclamation trust are invested in debt and equity securities and poor performance of these investments will reduce the amount of funds available for their intended purpose, which could require MidAmerican Energy or PacifiCorp's subsidiary to make additional cash contributions. As contributions to the trust are being made over the operating life of the respective facility, reductions in the expected operating life of the facility could also require MidAmerican Energy and PacifiCorp's subsidiary to make additional contributions to the related trust. Such cash funding obligations, which are also impacted by the other factors described above, could have a material impact on MidAmerican Energy's or PacifiCorp's liquidity by reducing their available cash.

Inflation and changes in commodity prices and fuel transportation costs may adversely affect each Registrant's financial results.

Inflation and increases in commodity prices and fuel transportation costs may affect each Registrant by increasing both operating and capital costs. As a result of existing rate agreements, contractual arrangements or competitive price pressures, each Registrant may not be able to pass the costs of inflation on to its customers. If each Registrant is unable to manage cost increases or pass them on to its customers, its financial results could be adversely affected.

Cyclical fluctuations and competition in the residential real estate brokerage and mortgage businesses could adversely affect HomeServices.

The residential real estate brokerage and mortgage industries tend to experience cycles of greater and lesser activity and profitability and are typically affected by changes in economic conditions, which are beyond HomeServices' control. Any of the following, among others, are examples of items that could have a material adverse effect on HomeServices' businesses by causing a general decline in the number of home sales, sale prices or the number of home financings which, in turn, would adversely affect its financial results:
rising interest rates or unemployment rates, including a sustained high unemployment rate in the U.S.;
periods of economic slowdown or recession in the markets served or the adverse effects on market actions as a result of epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks;
decreasing home affordability;
78


lack of available mortgage credit for potential homebuyers, such as the reduced availability of credit, which may continue into future periods;
inadequate home inventory levels;
sources of new competition; and
changes in applicable tax law.

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect each Registrant's ability to obtain debt financing or to draw upon or renew existing credit facilities and have other adverse effects on each Registrant.

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect each Registrant's ability to obtain debt financing or to draw upon or renew existing credit facilities and have other adverse effects on each Registrant. Significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the U.S., Great Britain, Canada and global credit markets, such as those that occurred in 2008, 2009 and 2020, may materially impact liquidity in the bank and debt capital markets, making financing terms less attractive for borrowers that are able to find financing and, in other cases, may cause certain types of debt financing, or any financing, to be unavailable. Additionally, economic uncertainty in the U.S. or globally may adversely affect the U.S. credit markets and could negatively impact each Registrant's ability to access funds on favorable terms or at all. If a Registrant is unable to access the bank and debt markets to meet liquidity and capital expenditure needs, it may adversely affect the timing and amount of its capital expenditures, acquisition financing and its financial results.

Each Registrant is involved in a variety of legal proceedings, the outcomes of which are uncertain and could adversely affect its financial results.

Each Registrant is, and in the future may become, a party to a variety of legal proceedings. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the Registrants cannot predict the outcome of individual matters with certainty. It is possible that the final resolution of some of the matters in which each Registrant is involved could result in additional material payments substantially in excess of established liabilities or in terms that could require each Registrant to change business practices and procedures or divest ownership of assets. Further, litigation could result in the imposition of financial penalties or injunctions and adverse regulatory consequences, any of which could limit each Registrant's ability to take certain desired actions or the denial of needed permits, licenses or regulatory authority to conduct its business, including the siting or permitting of facilities. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on such Registrant's financial results.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2.Properties

Each Registrant's energy properties consist of the physical assets necessary to support its electricity and natural gas businesses. Properties of the relevant Registrant's electricity businesses include electric generation, transmission and distribution facilities, as well as coal mining assets that support certain of PacifiCorp's electric generating facilities. Properties of the relevant Registrant's natural gas businesses include natural gas distribution facilities, interstate pipelines, storage facilities, LNG facilities, compressor stations and meter stations. The transmission and distribution assets are primarily within each Registrant's service territories. In addition to these physical assets, the Registrants have rights-of-way, mineral rights and water rights that enable each Registrant to utilize its facilities. It is the opinion of each Registrant's management that the principal depreciable properties owned by it are in good operating condition and are well maintained. Pursuant to separate financing agreements, substantially all of PacifiCorp's electric utility properties, MidAmerican Energy's electric utility properties in the state of Iowa, Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's properties in the state of Nevada, AltaLink's transmission properties and substantially all of the assets of the subsidiaries of BHE Renewables that are direct or indirect owners of generation projects are pledged or encumbered to support or otherwise provide the security for the related subsidiary debt. For additional information regarding each Registrant's energy properties, refer to Item 1 of this Form 10-K and Notes 4, 5 and 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements of MidAmerican Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Nevada Power in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Sierra Pacific in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Notes 4 and 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Eastern Energy Gas in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

79


The following table summarizes Berkshire Hathaway Energy's operating electric generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:
Facility NetNet Owned
EnergyCapacityCapacity
SourceEntityLocation by Significance(MWs)(MWs)
WindPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, BHE Canada, BHE Montana and BHE RenewablesIowa, Wyoming, Texas, Montana, Nebraska, Washington, California, Illinois, Canada, Oregon and Kansas12,282 12,282 
Natural gasPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, NV Energy, BHE Canada and BHE RenewablesNevada, Utah, Iowa, Illinois, Washington, Wyoming, Oregon, Texas, New York, Arizona and Canada11,284 11,005 
CoalPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and NV EnergyWyoming, Iowa, Utah, Nevada, Colorado and Montana13,210 8,178 
SolarMidAmerican Energy, NV Energy, Northern Powergrid and BHE RenewablesCalifornia, Australia, Texas, Arizona, Iowa, Minnesota and Nevada2,120 1,972 
HydroelectricPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and BHE RenewablesWashington, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Hawaii, Montana, Illinois, California and Wyoming985 985 
NuclearMidAmerican EnergyIllinois1,822 455 
GeothermalPacifiCorp and BHE RenewablesCalifornia and Utah377 377 
Total42,080 35,254 

Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, the Company has electric generating facilities that are under construction in Nevada and Wyoming having total Facility Net Capacity and Net Owned Capacity of 243 MWs.

The right to construct and operate each Registrant's electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines across certain property was obtained in most circumstances through negotiations and, where necessary, through prescription, eminent domain or similar rights. PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific, BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas and Kern River in the U.S.; Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc in Great Britain; and AltaLink in Alberta, Canada continue to have the power of eminent domain or similar rights in each of the jurisdictions in which they operate their respective facilities, but the U.S. and Canadian utilities do not have the power of eminent domain with respect to governmental, Native American or Canadian First Nations' tribal lands. Although the main Kern River pipeline crosses the Moapa Indian Reservation, all facilities in the Moapa Indian Reservation are located within a utility corridor that is reserved to the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management.

With respect to real property, each of the electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines fall into two basic categories: (1) parcels that are owned in fee, such as certain of the electric generating facilities, electric substations, natural gas compressor stations, natural gas meter stations and office sites; and (2) parcels where the interest derives from leases, easements (including prescriptive easements), rights-of-way, permits or licenses from landowners or governmental authorities permitting the use of such land for the construction, operation and maintenance of the electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines. Each Registrant believes it has satisfactory title or interest to all of the real property making up their respective facilities in all material respects.

80


Item 3.Legal Proceedings

Berkshire Hathaway Energy and PacifiCorp

On September 30, 2020, a putative class action complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885, Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by Oregon residents and businesses who seek to represent a class of all Oregon citizens and entities whose real or personal property was harmed beginning on September 7, 2020, by wildfires in Oregon allegedly caused by PacifiCorp. On November 3, 2021, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to limit the class to include Oregon citizens allegedly impacted by the Echo Mountain Complex, South Obenchain, Two Four Two and Santiam Canyon fires, as well as to add claims for noneconomic damages. The amended complaint alleges that PacifiCorp's assets contributed to the Oregon wildfires occurring on or after September 7, 2020 and that PacifiCorp acted with gross negligence, among other things. The amended complaint seeks the following damages for the plaintiffs and the putative class: (i) noneconomic damages, including mental suffering, emotional distress, inconvenience and interference with normal and usual activities, in excess of $1 billion; (ii) damages for real and personal property and other economic losses of not less than $600 million; (iii) double the amount of property and economic damages; (iv) treble damages for specific costs associated with loss of timber, trees and shrubbery; (v) double the damages for the costs of litigation and reforestation; (vi) prejudgment interest; and (vii) reasonable attorney fees, investigation costs and expert witness fees. The plaintiffs demand a trial by jury and have reserved their right to further amend the complaint to allege claims for punitive damages. In May 2022, the Multnomah Circuit Court granted issue class certification and consolidated this case with others as described below. PacifiCorp requested an immediate appeal of the issue class certification before the Oregon Court of Appeals. In January 2023, the Oregon Court of Appeals denied PacifiCorp's request for appeal. In February 2023, the plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint to add punitive damages in an unspecified amount.

On August 20, 2021, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Shylo Salter et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV33595, Multnomah County, Oregon, in which two complaints, Case No. 21CV09339 and Case No. 21CV09520, previously filed in Circuit Court, Marion County, Oregon, were combined. The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the previously filed complaints in Marion County, Oregon. The refiled complaint was filed by Oregon residents and businesses who allege that they were injured by the Beachie Creek fire, which the plaintiffs allege began on or around September 7, 2020, but which government reports indicate began on or around August 16, 2020. The complaint alleges that PacifiCorp's assets contributed to the Beachie Creek fire and that PacifiCorp acted with gross negligence, among other things. The complaint seeks the following damages: (i) damages related to real and personal property in an amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, estimated not to exceed $75 million; (ii) other economic losses in an amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, but not to exceed $75 million; (iii) noneconomic damages in the amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, but not to exceed $500 million; (iv) double the damages for economic and property damages under specified Oregon statutes; (v) alternatively, treble the damages under specified Oregon statutes; (vi) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre- and post-judgment interest. The plaintiffs demand a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint with an intent to add a claim for punitive damages. In May 2022, this case was consolidated with others as described below.

In May 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court granted plaintiffs' motion to consolidate Shylo Salter et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV33595 (described above) and Amy Allen, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 20CV37430 ("Allen") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). Plaintiffs' motion to bifurcate issues for trial between class-wide liability and individual damages was also granted. The Allen case was filed by five individuals as amended in September 2021 claiming in excess of $32 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- and post-judgment interest.

In June 2022, an amended complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Tim Goforth et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 20CV37637, Douglas County, Oregon, in which a previously filed complaint associated with the Archie Creek, Susan Creek and Smith Springs Road fires in Douglas County in September 2020 was amended to add punitive damages. The complaint alleges (i) PacifiCorp's conduct not only constituted common law negligence but gross negligence and contributed to or was the cause of ignition and spread of the aforementioned fires; (ii) PacifiCorp violated certain Oregon rules and regulations; and (iii) as an alternative to negligence, inverse condemnation. The complaint seeks the following damages: (i) economic and property damages of $11 million under a determination of negligence or inverse condemnation and subject to doubling under Oregon statute if applicable; (ii) doubling of those economic and property damages to $22 million under a determination of gross negligence; (iii) damages for injuries in excess of $47 million; (iv) punitive damages not to exceed 10 times the amount of non-economic damages awarded; (v) all costs of the lawsuit; (vi) pre- and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and (vii) attorneys' fees and other costs. Pursuant to a settlement stipulation agreed to in November 2022, the Douglas County Circuit Court issued an order dismissing the case with prejudice and without costs, disbursements or attorney fees to any of the parties.

81


On August 26, 2022, a putative class action complaint seeking declaratory and equitable relief against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Margaret Dietrich et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29187, Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by two Oregon residents individually and on behalf of a class initially defined to include residents of, business owners in, real or personal property owners in and any other individuals physically present in specified Oregon counties as of September 7, 2020 who experienced any harm, damage or loss as a result of the Santiam, Beachie Creek, Lionshead, Echo Mountain Complex, Two Four Two or South Obenchain fires in September 2020. The complaint was amended on September 6, 2022, to seek damages of over $900 million that were originally demanded on August 4, 2022, pursuant to Oregon Rule of Civil Procedure 32 H. The amended complaint alleges: (i) negligence due to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules; (ii) gross negligence due to alleged conscious indifference to or reckless disregard for the probable consequences of defendant's actions or inactions; (iii) private nuisance; (iv) public nuisance; (v) trespass; (vi) inverse condemnation; (vii) accounting/injunction; (viii) negligent infliction of emotional distress. The amended complaint seeks the following: (i) an order certifying the matter as a class action; (ii) economic damages not less than $400 million; (iii) double the amount of economic and property damages to the extent applicable under Oregon statute; (iv) reasonable costs of reforestation activities; (v) doubling and trebling of certain other damages to the extent applicable under certain Oregon statutes; (vi) noneconomic damages not less than $500 million; (vii) prejudgment interest; (viii) an order requiring an accounting with respect to the amount of damages; (ix) an order enjoining PacifiCorp from leaving power lines energized in areas of Oregon experiencing extremely critical fire conditions; (x) an award of reasonable attorney fees, costs, investigation costs, disbursements and expert witness fees; and (xi) other relief the court finds appropriate. The plaintiffs and proposed class demand a trial by jury. On December 19, 2022, the Dietrich case was consolidated into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above) and is currently stayed.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Martin Klinger et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29674, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Klinger"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Jeremiah E. Bowen et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29681, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Bowen"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned James Weathers et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29683, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Weathers"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 6, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Blair Barnholdt et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30097, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Barnholdt"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Estate of Nancy Darlene Hunter, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30214, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Hunter"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Willard K. Pratt et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30217, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Pratt"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned April Thompson et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30451, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Thompson"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.


82


The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Hunter, Pratt and Thompson cases are in the process of being consolidated with Sparkset al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV48022 ("Sparks")and Russieet al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV15840 ("Russie") into Ashley Andersen et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV36567 ("Andersen"). The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson complaints each allege: (i) negligence due in part to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules, including those issued by the OPUC; (ii) gross negligence alleged in the form of willful, wanton and reckless disregard of known risks to the public; (iii) trespass; (iv) nuisance; and (v) inverse condemnation. The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson complaints each seek the following damages: (i) economic and property related damages of $83 million; (ii) doubling of those economic and property related damages to $167 million to the extent eligible for doubling of damages under the specified Oregon statute; (iii) non-economic damages to the plaintiffs' persons in an amount not less than $83 million for physical injury, mental suffering, emotional distress and other damages; (iv) loss of wages, loss of earnings capacity, evacuation expenses, displacement expenses and similar damages; (v) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre-judgment interest. The plaintiffs for each Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson request a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. The Hunter complaint seeks $50 million in damages and alleges claims for: (i) negligence, (ii) trespass, (iii), nuisance, (iv) inverse condemnation, and (v) wrongful death. The Andersen case was filed by 50 individuals as amended in August 2022 seeking $250 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest. The Sparks case was filed by 17 individuals in December 2021 claiming $125 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- judgment interest. The Russie case was filed by 45 individuals as amended in September 2022 seeking $250 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Aaron Macy-Wyngarden et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29684, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Macy-Wyngarden"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Beachie Creek, Santiam Canyon, Lionshead and Riverside fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 22, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Zachary Bogle et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29717, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Bogle"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Beachie Creek, Santiam Canyon, Lionshead and Riverside fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

The Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle complaints each allege: (i) negligence due in part to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules, including those issued by the OPUC; (ii) gross negligence alleged in the form of willful, wanton and reckless disregard of known risks to the public; (iii) trespass; (iv) nuisance; and (v) inverse condemnation. The Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle complaints each seek the following damages: (i) economic and property related damages of $83 million; (ii) doubling of those economic and property related damages to $167 million to the extent eligible for doubling of damages under the specified Oregon statute; (iii) non-economic damages to the plaintiffs' persons in an amount not less than $83 million for physical injury, mental suffering, emotional distress and other damages; (iv) loss of wages, loss of earnings capacity, evacuation expenses, displacement expenses and similar damages; (v) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre-judgment interest. The plaintiffs for each Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle request a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages.

On September 2, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Logan et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29859, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Logan"). The Logan complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The Logan case is in the process of being consolidated with Cady et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV13946 ("Cady") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Logan and Cady complaints each allege: (i) negligence; (ii) trespass; (iii) nuisance, and (iv) inverse condemnation. The Logan case was filed by five individuals claiming $10 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- and post-judgment interest. The Cady case was filed by 21 individuals as amended in April 2022 claiming $10 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest.

83


On October 14, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV26326 ("21st Century") and Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29976 into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The 21st Century and Allstate complaints were each filed by subrogated insurance carriers alleging claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, and (iii) inverse condemnation resulting from the September 2020 Santiam Canyon, Echo Mountain Complex, 242, and South Obenchain fires. The 21st Century case was filed in August 2022 by 177 insurance carriers seeking $20 million in damages. The Allstate case was filed in September 2022 by 11 insurance carriers seeking $40 million in damages.

On October 17, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated Michael Bell, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30450 ("Bell") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Bell case was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon on September 7, 2022, by 59 plaintiffs seeking $35 million in damages for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) trespass, (iii) nuisance, and (iv) inverse condemnation.

On October 19, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated Freres Timber, Inc. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29694 ("Freres") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Freres case was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon on September 1, 2022, by one plaintiff and seeks $40m for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, and (iii) inverse condemnation.

On December 6, 2022, CW Specialty Lumber, Inc., et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV41640 ("CW Specialty") was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon by two plaintiffs seeking $28.6 million in damages for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, (iii) trespass, and (iv) inverse condemnation. The CW Specialty case is in the process of being consolidated into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above).

Other individual lawsuits alleging similar claims have been filed in Oregon and California related to the 2020 Wildfires, including multiple complaints filed in California for the September 2020 Slater Fire. Multiple complaints have also been filed in California for the 2022 McKinney fire. The complaints filed in California do not specify damages sought. Investigations into the causes and origins of those wildfires are ongoing. For more information regarding certain legal proceedings affecting Berkshire Hathaway Energy, refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and PacifiCorp, refer to Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

PacifiCorp

On March 17, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Roseburg Resources Co et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV09346, Circuit Court, Douglas County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by nine businesses and public pension plans that own and/or operate timberlands or possess property in Douglas County who allege damages, losses and injuries associated with their timberlands as a result of the French Creek, Archie Creek, Susan Creek and Smith Springs Road fires in Douglas County in September 2020. The complaint alleges (i) PacifiCorp's conduct constituted not only common law negligence but also gross negligence and that such conduct contributed to or caused the ignition and spread of the aforementioned fires; (ii) PacifiCorp violated certain Oregon rules and regulations; and (iii) as an alternative to negligence, inverse condemnation. The complaint seeks the following damages as amended: (i) economic and property damages in excess of $195 million under a determination of negligence or inverse condemnation; (ii) doubling of those economic damages to in excess of $390 million under a determination of gross negligence pursuant to Oregon statutes; (iii) all costs of the lawsuit; (iv) prejudgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and (v) attorneys' fees and other costs.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Information regarding Berkshire Hathaway Energy's and PacifiCorp's mine safety violations and other legal matters disclosed in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K.

84


PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY

BHE's common stock is beneficially owned by Berkshire Hathaway and family members and related or affiliated entities of the late Mr. Walter Scott, Jr., a former member of BHE's Board of Directors, and has not been registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, listed on a stock exchange or otherwise publicly held or traded. BHE has not declared or paid any cash dividends to its common shareholders since Berkshire Hathaway acquired an equity ownership interest in BHE in March 2000 and does not presently anticipate that it will declare any dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.

PACIFICORP

All common stock of PacifiCorp is held by its parent company, PPW Holdings LLC, which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. PacifiCorp declared and paid dividends to PPW Holdings LLC of $300 million in 2023, $100 million in 2022 and $150 million in 2021.

MIDAMERICAN FUNDING AND MIDAMERICAN ENERGY

All common stock of MidAmerican Energy is held by its parent company, MHC, which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of MidAmerican Funding. MidAmerican Funding is an Iowa limited liability company whose membership interest is held solely by BHE. MidAmerican Funding declared and paid cash distributions to BHE of $100 million in 2023, $69 million in 2022 and $— million in 2021. MidAmerican Energy declared and paid cash dividends to MHC totaling $100 million in 2023, $275 million in 2022 and $— million in 2021.

NEVADA POWER

All common stock of Nevada Power is held by its parent company, NV Energy, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Nevada Power declared and paid dividends to NV Energy of $— million in 2022 and $213 million in 2021.

SIERRA PACIFIC

All common stock of Sierra Pacific is held by its parent company, NV Energy, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Sierra Pacific declared and paid dividends to NV Energy of $70 million in 2022 and $— million in 2021.

EASTERN ENERGY GAS

Eastern Energy Gas is a Virginia limited liability corporation whose membership interest is held solely by its parent company, BHE GT&S, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Eastern Energy Gas declared and paid dividends to BHE GT&S of $— million in 2022 and 2021.

EGTS

All common stock of EGTS is held by its parent company, Eastern Energy Gas, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. EGTS declared and paid dividends to Eastern Energy Gas of $215 million in 2022 and $18 million in 2021.
85


Item 6.[Reserved]

Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy Company
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy Company
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries

86


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MidAmerican Energy Company
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Balance Sheets
Statements of Operations
Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Financial Statements
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Member's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
87


Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section
88


Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

The reportable segment financial information includes all necessary adjustments and eliminations needed to conform to the Company's significant accounting policies. The differences between the reportable segment amounts and the consolidated amounts, described as BHE and Other, relate principally to other entities, including MES, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

Results of Operations

Overview

Operating revenue and earnings on common shares for the Company's reportable segments for the years ended December 31 are summarized as follows (in millions):

20222021Change20212020Change
Operating revenue:
PacifiCorp$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
MidAmerican Funding4,025 3,547 478 13 3,547 2,728 819 30 
NV Energy3,824 3,107 717 23 3,107 2,854 253 
Northern Powergrid1,365 1,188 177 15 1,188 1,022 166 16 
BHE Pipeline Group3,844 3,544 300 3,544 1,578 1,966 *
BHE Transmission732 731 — 731 659 72 11 
BHE Renewables994 981 13 981 936 45 
HomeServices5,268 6,215 (947)(15)6,215 5,396 819 15 
BHE and Other606 541 65 12 541 438 103 24 
Total operating revenue$26,337 $25,150 $1,187 %$25,150 $20,952 $4,198 20 %
Earnings on common shares:
PacifiCorp$921 $889 $32 %$889 $741 $148 20 %
MidAmerican Funding947 883 64 883 818 65 
NV Energy427 439 (12)(3)439 410 29 
Northern Powergrid385 247 138 56 247 201 46 23 
BHE Pipeline Group1,040 807 233 29 807 528 279 53 
BHE Transmission247 247 — — 247 231 16 
BHE Renewables(1)
625 451 174 39 451 521 (70)(13)
HomeServices100 387 (287)(74)387 375 12 
BHE and Other(2,017)1,319 (3,336)*1,319 3,092 (1,773)(57)
Total earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $(2,994)(53)%$5,669 $6,917 $(1,248)(18)%

(1)Includes the tax attributes of disregarded entities that are not required to pay income taxes and the earnings of which are taxable directly to BHE.

*    Not meaningful.

Earnings on common shares decreased $2,994 million for 2022 compared to 2021. Included in these results was a pre-tax loss in 2022 of $1,950 million ($1,540 million after-tax) compared to a pre-tax gain in 2021 of $1,796 million ($1,777 million after-tax) related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited. Excluding the impact of this item, adjusted earnings on common shares in 2022 was $4,215 million, an increase of $323 million, or 8%, compared to adjusted earnings on common shares in 2021 of $3,892 million.
89



The decrease in net income attributable to BHE shareholders for 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily due to:
The Utilities' earnings increased $84 million reflecting higher electric utility margin and favorable income tax expense, primarily from higher PTCs recognized of $157 million, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance expense and higher depreciation and amortization expense. Electric retail customer volumes increased 2.4% for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher customer usage, an increase in the average number of customers and the favorable impact of weather;
Northern Powergrid's earnings increased $138 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a deferred income tax charge of $109 million related to a June 2021 enacted increase in the United States.Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023 and favorable earnings from new gas and solar projects, partially offset by $41 million from the stronger U.S. dollar;

BHE Pipeline Group's earnings increased $233 million due to higher earnings at BHE GT&S from the impacts of the EGTS general rate case, favorable income tax adjustments, lower operations and maintenance expense and higher margin from non-regulated activities;
BHE Renewables' earnings increased $174 million, primarily due to higher operating revenue from owned renewable energy projects and higher earnings from tax equity investments, mainly due to the unfavorable impacts from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event;
HomeServices' earnings decreased $287 million, reflecting lower earnings from brokerage and settlement services largely attributable to a decrease in closed units at existing companies and lower earnings from mortgage services mainly from a decrease in funded volumes; and
BHE and Other's earnings decreased $3,336 million, primarily due to the $3,317 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited.
Earnings on common shares decreased $1,248 million for 2021 compared to 2020. Included in these results was a pre-tax gain in 2021 of $1,796 million ($1,777 million after-tax) compared to a pre-tax gain in 2020 of $4,774 million ($3,470 million after-tax) related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited. Excluding the impact of this item, adjusted earnings on common shares in 2021 was $3,892 million, an increase of $445 million, or 13%, compared to adjusted earnings on common shares in 2020 of $3,447 million.

The decrease in net income attributable to BHE shareholders for 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily due to:
The Utilities' earnings increased $242 million reflecting higher electric utility margin, favorable income tax expense, from higher PTCs recognized of $139 million and the impacts of ratemaking, and lower operations and maintenance expense, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense. Electric retail customer volumes increased 3.8% for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher customer usage, an increase in the average number of customers and the favorable impact of weather;
Northern Powergrid's earnings increased $46 million, primarily due to higher distribution performance, lower write-offs of gas exploration costs and $16 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, partially offset by the comparative unfavorable impact of deferred income tax charges ($109 million in second quarter 2021 and $35 million in third quarter 2020) related to enacted increases in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate;
BHE Pipeline Group's earnings increased $279 million, primarily due to $244 million of incremental earnings at BHE GT&S;
BHE Renewables' earnings decreased $70 million, primarily due to lower tax equity investment earnings from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, partially offset by earnings from tax equity investment projects reaching commercial operation and higher operating performance from owned renewable energy projects; and
BHE and Other's earnings decreased $1,773 million, primarily due to the $1,693 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited and $95 million of higher dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued in October 2020, partially offset by favorable comparative consolidated state income tax benefits.

90


Reportable Segment Results

PacifiCorp

Operating revenue increased $383 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher retail revenue of $263 million and higher wholesale and other revenue of $120 million, largely from higher average wholesale prices. Retail revenue increased primarily due to price impacts of $166 million from higher average retail rates largely due to product mix and tariff changes and $97 million from higher retail volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.6%, primarily due to the favorable impact of weather and an increase in the average number of customers, partially offset by lower customer usage.

Earnings increased $32 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher utility margin of $235 million and higher allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction of $28 million, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance expense of $196 million, higher depreciation and amortization expense of $32 million, mainly from additional assets placed in-service, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and an unfavorable income tax benefit. Utility margin increased primarily due to favorable deferred net power costs, higher retail rates and volumes and higher average wholesale prices, partially offset by higher purchased power and thermal generation costs. Operations and maintenance expense increased mainly due to an increase in loss accruals and other costs associated with the September 2020 wildfires, net of estimated insurance recoveries, and higher general and plant maintenance costs. The unfavorable income tax benefit was largely due to state income tax impacts, partially offset by higher PTCs recognized of $21 million.

Operating revenue decreased $45 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower retail revenue of $98 million, partially offset by higher wholesale and other revenue of $53 million. Retail revenue decreased mainly due to $234 million from the Utah and Oregon general rate case orders issued in 2020 (fully offset in expense, primarily depreciation) and price impacts of $41 million from lower rates primarily due to certain general rate case orders, partially offset by higher customer volumes of $177 million. Retail customer volumes increased 3.1%, primarily due to higher customer usage, an increase in the average number of customers and the favorable impact of weather. Wholesale and other revenue increased mainly due to higher wheeling revenue, average wholesale prices and REC sales, partially offset by $34 million from the Oregon RAC settlement (fully offset in depreciation expense) recognized in 2020.

Earnings increased $148 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to favorable income tax expense from higher PTCs recognized of $75 million from new wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service, and the impacts of ratemaking, lower operations and maintenance expense of $178 million and higher utility margin of $145 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $255 million and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction of $72 million. Operations and maintenance expense decreased primarily due to lower costs associated with wildfires and the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement and lower thermal plant maintenance expense, partially offset by higher costs associated with additional wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service as well as higher distribution maintenance costs. Utility margin increased primarily due to the higher retail customer volumes, higher wheeling and wholesale revenue and higher deferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms, partially offset by higher purchased power and thermal generation costs, the price impacts from lower retail rates and higher wheeling expenses. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to the impacts of a depreciation study effective January 1, 2021, as well as additional assets placed in-service.

MidAmerican Funding

Operating revenue increased $478 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $459 million and higher natural gas operating revenue of $27 million. Electric operating revenue increased due to higher wholesale and other revenue of $261 million and higher retail revenue of $198 million. Electric wholesale and other revenue increased mainly due to higher average wholesale per-unit prices of $229 million and higher wholesale volumes of $36 million. Electric retail revenue increased primarily due to higher recoveries through adjustment clauses of $134 million (fully offset in expense, primarily cost of sales) and higher customer volumes of $62 million. Electric retail customer volumes increased 4.3%, primarily due to higher customer usage and the favorable impact of weather. Natural gas operating revenue increased due to higher customer usage of $9 million, the favorable impact of weather of $9 million and the impacts of tax reform of $5 million.

91


Earnings increased $64 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric utility margin of $319 million, a favorable income tax benefit and higher natural gas utility margin of $25 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $254 million, higher operations and maintenance expense of $53 million, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and higher non-service benefit plan costs of $17 million. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to higher wholesale and retail revenues, partially offset by higher purchased power and thermal generation costs. The favorable income tax benefit was mainly due to higher PTCs recognized of $136 million, partially offset by state income tax impacts. Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily from the impacts of certain regulatory mechanisms and additional assets placed in-service. Operations and maintenance expense increased due to higher general and plant maintenance costs.

Operating revenue increased $819 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher natural gas operating revenue of $430 million and higher electric operating revenue of $390 million. Natural gas operating revenue increased due to a higher average per-unit cost of natural gas sold resulting in higher purchased gas adjustment recoveries of $440 million (fully offset in cost of sales), largely due to the February 2021 polar vortex weather event. Electric operating revenue increased due to higher retail revenue of $198 million and higher wholesale and other revenue of $192 million. Electric retail revenue increased primarily due to higher recoveries through adjustment clauses of $116 million (fully offset in expense, primarily cost of sales), higher customer volumes of $63 million and price impacts of $19 million from changes in sales mix. Electric retail customer volumes increased 5.8% due to increased usage of certain industrial customers and the favorable impact of weather. Electric wholesale and other revenue increased primarily due to higher average wholesale prices of $116 million and higher wholesale volumes of $71 million.

Earnings increased $65 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher electric utility margin of $190 million and a favorable income tax benefit, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $198 million, higher operations and maintenance expense of $20 million and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds of $8 million. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to the higher retail and wholesale revenues, partially offset by higher thermal generation and purchased power costs. The favorable income tax benefit was largely due to higher PTCs recognized of $64 million, from new wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service, partially offset by state income tax impacts. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to the impacts of certain regulatory mechanisms and additional assets placed in-service. Operations and maintenance expense increased primarily due to higher costs associated with additional wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service and higher natural gas distribution costs, partially offset by 2020 costs associated with storm restoration activities.

NV Energy

Operating revenue increased $717 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $668 million and higher natural gas operating revenue of $51 million from a higher average per-unit cost of natural gas sold (fully offset in cost of sales). Electric operating revenue increased primarily due to higher fully-bundled energy rates (fully offset in cost of sales) of $636 million, higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals of $15 million and higher customer volumes of $6 million. Electric retail customer volumes increased 2.2%, primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of weather.

Earnings decreased $12 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher operations and maintenance expense of $24 million, higher depreciation and amortization expense of $17 million, higher interest expense of $15 million, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and higher non-service benefit plan costs of $11 million, partially offset by higher interest and dividend income of $36 million from carrying charges on regulatory balances and higher electric utility margin of $32 million. Operations and maintenance expense increased mainly due to higher general and plant maintenance costs and an unfavorable change in earnings sharing at the Nevada Utilities. Depreciation and amortization expense increased mainly from additional assets placed in-service. Electric utility margin increased mainly due to higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals of $15 million and higher electric retail customer volumes.

Operating revenue increased $253 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $252 million. Electric operating revenue increased primarily due to higher fully-bundled energy rates (fully offset in cost of sales) of $229 million, a $120 million one-time bill credit in the fourth quarter of 2020 resulting from a regulatory rate review decision (fully offset in operations and maintenance and income tax expenses) and higher retail customer volumes of $10 million, partially offset by lower base tariff general rates of $71 million at Nevada Power and a favorable regulatory decision in 2020. Electric retail customer volumes increased 3.3%, primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, higher customer usage and the favorable impact of weather.

92


Earnings increased $29 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower operations and maintenance expense of $90 million, lower income tax expense mainly from the impacts of ratemaking, lower interest expense of $21 million, higher interest and dividend income of $16 million and lower pension expense of $10 million, partially offset by lower electric utility margin of $97 million and higher depreciation and amortization expense of $47 million. Operations and maintenance expense decreased primarily due to lower regulatory deferrals and amortizations and lower earnings sharing at the Nevada Utilities. Electric utility margin decreased primarily due to lower base tariff general rates at Nevada Power and a favorable regulatory decision in 2020, partially offset by higher retail customer volumes. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was mainly due to the regulatory amortization of decommissioning costs and additional assets placed in-service.

Northern Powergrid

Operating revenue increased $177 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher distribution revenue of $167 million and higher revenue of $158 million, due to a gas project that commenced commercial operation in March 2022 and a solar project that commenced commercial operation in July 2022, partially offset by $155 million from the stronger U.S. dollar. Distribution revenue increased primarily due to the recovery of Supplier of Last Resort payments of $135 million (fully offset in cost of sales) and higher tariff rates of $78 million, partially offset by a 4.6% decline in units distributed of $36 million.

Earnings increased $138 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a deferred income tax charge of $109 million related to a June 2021 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023, the higher distribution tariff rates and improved earnings of $47 million from the new gas and solar projects, partially offset by $41 million from the stronger U.S. dollar, the decline in units distributed and higher distribution-related operating and depreciation expenses of $25 million.

Operating revenue increased $166 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher distribution revenue of $80 million, mainly from increased tariff rates of $40 million and a 3.2% increase in units distributed totaling $26 million, and $77 million from the weaker U.S. dollar.

Earnings increased $46 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to the higher distribution revenue, lower write-offs of gas exploration costs of $36 million, $16 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, favorable pension expense of $14 million and lower interest expense of $8 million, partially offset by higher income tax expense and higher distribution-related operating and depreciation expenses of $29 million. Earnings in 2021 included a deferred income tax charge of $109 million related to a June 2021 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023, while earnings in 2020 included a deferred income tax charge of $35 million related to a July 2020 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 17% to 19% effective April 1, 2020.

BHE Pipeline Group

Operating revenue increased $300 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher operating revenue of $242 million at BHE GT&S and $47 million at Northern Natural Gas. The increase in operating revenue at BHE GT&S was primarily due to higher nonregulated revenue of $109 million (largely offset in cost of sales) from favorable commodity prices, an increase in regulated gas transportation and storage services rates due to the settlement of EGTS' general rate case of $101 million and higher LNG revenue of $56 million at Cove Point, largely from favorable variable revenue, partially offset by lower gas sales of $49 million at EGTS from operational and system balancing activities. The increase in operating revenue at Northern Natural Gas was mainly due to higher transportation revenue of $63 million offset by lower gas sales of $14 million from system balancing activities. The variances in transportation revenue and gas sales included favorable impacts recognized of $49 million and $77 million, respectively, from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event. Excluding this item, transportation revenue increased $112 million due to higher volumes and rates and gas sales increased $63 million (largely offset in cost of sales).

Earnings increased $233 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher earnings of $232 million at BHE GT&S. Earnings at BHE GT&S increased mainly due to the impacts of the EGTS general rate case of $124 million, favorable income tax adjustments, lower operations and maintenance and property and other tax expense of $30 million, higher margin of $26 million from nonregulated activities and increased earnings at Cove Point of $16 million.

93


Operating revenue increased $1,966 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $1,828 million of incremental revenue at BHE GT&S, acquired in November 2020, higher gas sales of $115 million ($38 million largely offset in costs of sales) at Northern Natural Gas and higher transportation revenue of $29 million at Kern River largely due to higher rates and volumes, partially offset by lower transportation revenue of $24 million at Northern Natural Gas primarily due to lower volumes. The variances in gas sales and transportation revenue at Northern Natural Gas included favorable impacts of $77 million and $49 million, respectively, from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event.

Earnings increased $279 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $244 million of incremental earnings at BHE GT&S, favorable earnings of $19 million at Kern River from the higher transportation revenue and higher earnings of $15 million at Northern Natural Gas, primarily due to higher gross margin on gas sales and higher transportation revenue, each due to the favorable impacts of the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, offset by the lower transportation revenue.

BHE Transmission

Operating revenue increased $1 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher nonregulated revenue from wind-powered generating facilities, partially offset by $27 million from the stronger U.S. dollar.

Earnings for 2022 were equal to 2021, primarily due to improved equity earnings from ETT offset by $7 million from the stronger U.S. dollar.

Operating revenue increased $72 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $47 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, a regulatory decision received in November 2020 at AltaLink and higher revenue from the Montana-Alberta Tie Line of $11 million.

Earnings increased $16 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $12 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, higher earnings from the Montana-Alberta Tie Line and lower nonregulated interest expense at BHE Canada, partially offset by the impact of a regulatory decision received in April 2020 at AltaLink.

BHE Renewables

Operating revenue increased $13 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher wind, geothermal, and solar revenues of $140 million from higher generation and pricing, partially offset by lower natural gas revenues of $72 million from lower generation and hedge losses, lower hydro revenues of $28 million due to the transfer of the Casecnan generating facility to the Philippine government in December 2021 and $27 million from unfavorable changes in the valuation of certain derivative contracts.

Earnings increased $174 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher wind earnings of $214 million, higher geothermal earnings of $16 million and higher solar earnings of $14 million, partially offset by lower natural gas earnings of $44 million and lower hydro earnings of $18 million due to the Casecnan generating facility transfer. Wind earnings increased due to higher earnings from tax equity investments of $153 million, largely as a result of the unfavorable impacts recognized in 2021 from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event and higher production tax credits, and higher earnings from owned projects of $61 million.

Operating revenue increased $45 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher natural gas, solar, wind and hydro revenues from favorable market conditions and higher generation, partially offset by an unfavorable change in the valuation of a power purchase agreement of $30 million.

Earnings decreased $70 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower wind earnings of $83 million, largely from lower tax equity investment earnings of $90 million, and lower hydro earnings of $10 million, mainly due to lower income from a declining financial asset balance, partially offset by higher solar earnings of $22 million, mainly due to the higher operating revenue and lower depreciation expense. Tax equity investment earnings decreased due to unfavorable results from existing tax equity investments of $165 million, primarily due to the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, and lower commitment fee income, partially offset by $87 million of earnings from projects reaching commercial operation.

94


HomeServices

Operating revenue decreased $947 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower brokerage and settlement services revenue of $637 million and lower mortgage revenue of $305 million. The decrease in brokerage and settlement services revenue resulted from an 11% decrease in closed transaction volume driven by 23% fewer closed units at existing companies resulting from rising interest rates and a corresponding slowdown in home sales offset by acquisitions and a 7% increase in average sales price. The lower mortgage revenue was due to a 40% decrease in funded volume, primarily due to a decline in refinance activity resulting from rising interest rates.

Earnings decreased $287 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower earnings from brokerage and settlement services of $142 million and mortgage services of $126 million, largely from the decrease in funded volumes from rising interest rates. Earnings at brokerage and settlement services declined due to the decrease in closed units at existing companies, partially offset by favorable operating expense variances.

Operating revenue increased $819 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher brokerage revenue of $951 million, partially offset by lower mortgage revenue of $169 million from an 8% decrease in funded volume due to a decrease in refinance activity. The increase in brokerage revenue was due to a 21% increase in closed transaction volume at existing companies resulting from increases in average sales price and closed units.

Earnings increased $12 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher earnings from brokerage and franchise services of $81 million, largely attributable to the increase in closed transaction volume at existing companies, partially offset by lower earnings from mortgage services of $68 million from the decrease in refinance activity.

BHE and Other

Operating revenue increased $65 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric and natural gas sales revenue at MES, from favorable electric volumes and natural gas pricing, including changes in unrealized positions on derivative contracts, offset by lower electric pricing and natural gas volumes.

Earnings decreased $3,336 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to the $3,317 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited, unfavorable comparative consolidated state income tax benefits, higher BHE corporate interest expense from an April 2022 debt issuance and unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies, partially offset by $75 million of lower dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway and lower corporate costs.

Operating revenue increased $103 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher electricity and natural gas sales revenue at MES, from favorable pricing offset by lower volumes.

Earnings decreased $1,773 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to the $1,693 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited, $95 million of higher dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued in October 2020 to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway, higher corporate costs and higher BHE corporate interest expense from debt issuances in March and October 2020, partially offset by favorable comparative consolidated state income tax benefits and higher earnings of $17 million at MES.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Each of BHE's direct and indirect subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity separate and apart from BHE and its other subsidiaries. It should not be assumed that the assets of any subsidiary will be available to satisfy BHE's obligations or the obligations of its other subsidiaries. However, unrestricted cash or other assets that are available for distribution may, subject to applicable law, regulatory commitments and the terms of financing and ring-fencing arrangements for such parties, be advanced, loaned, paid as dividends or otherwise distributed or contributed to BHE or affiliates thereof. The Company's long-term debt may include provisions that allow BHE or its subsidiaries to redeem such debt in whole or in part at any time. These provisions generally include make-whole premiums. Refer to Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding the limitation of distributions from BHE's subsidiaries.

95


As of December 31, 2022, the Company's total net liquidity was as follows (in millions):
BHE Pipeline
MidAmericanNVNorthernBHEGroup and
 BHEPacifiCorpFundingEnergyPowergridCanadaHomeServicesOtherTotal
 
Cash and cash equivalents$32$641$261$108$37$56$239 $217$1,591 
   
Credit facilities(1)
3,5001,2001,5096502967932,925 10,873 
Less: 
Short-term debt(245)(120)(197)(557)(1,119)
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(249)(370)(1)— (620)
Net credit facilities3,2559511,1396501765952,368 9,134 
Total net liquidity$3,287$1,592$1,400$758$213$651$2,607 $217$10,725 
Credit facilities:      
Maturity dates202520252023, 202520252025, 20262023, 2026, 20272023, 2026 

(1)    Includes $55 million drawn on capital expenditure and other uncommitted credit facilities at Northern Powergrid.

Refer to Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding the Company's credit facilities, letters of credit, equity commitments and other related items.

Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $9.4 billion and $8.7 billion, respectively. The increase was primarily due to an increase in income tax receipts and improved operating results, partially offset by changes in regulatory assets and working capital.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $8.7 billion and $6.2 billion, respectively. The increase was primarily due to $970 million of incremental net cash flows from operating activities at BHE GT&S, improved operating results and changes in working capital.

The timing of the Company's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $(7.8) billion and $(5.8) billion, respectively. The change was primarily due to the July 2021 receipt of $1.3 billion due to the termination of the second Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement" with Dominion Questar, higher capital expenditures of $894 million and higher cash paid for acquisitions, partially offset by lower funding of tax equity investments. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $(5.8) billion and $(13.2) billion, respectively. The change was primarily due to lower funding of tax equity investments, lower cash paid for acquisitions and the July 2021 receipt of $1.3 billion due to the termination of the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.

96


Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Business Acquisition

On November 1, 2020, BHE completed its acquisition of substantially all of the natural gas transmission and storage business of DEI and Dominion Questar, exclusive of the Questar Pipeline Group. Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated July 3, 2020, BHE paid approximately $2.5 billion in cash, after post-closing adjustments (the "GT&S Cash Consideration").

On October 5, 2020, BHE entered into the "Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement") with Dominion Questar providing for BHE's purchase of the Questar Pipeline Group from Dominion Questar after receipt of HSR Approval for a cash purchase price of approximately $1.3 billion (the "Q-Pipe Cash Consideration"), subject to adjustment for cash and indebtedness as of the closing. Under the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement, BHE delivered the Q-Pipe Cash Consideration of approximately $1.3 billion to Dominion Questar on November 2, 2020.

On July 9, 2021, Dominion Questar and DEI delivered a written notice to BHE stating that BHE and Dominion Questar have mutually elected to terminate the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement. On July 14, 2021, BHE received the Purchase Price Repayment Amount of approximately $1.3 billion in cash.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $(1.0) billion. Sources of cash totaled $3.9 billion and consisted of proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances of $2.9 billion and proceeds from BHE senior debt issuances of $1.0 billion. Uses of cash totaled $4.9 billion and consisted mainly of repayments of subsidiary debt totaling $1.5 billion, purchases of common stock of $870 million, net repayments of short-term debt totaling $867 million, preferred stock redemptions totaling $800 million and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $524 million.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $(3.1) billion. Sources of cash totaled $2.4 billion and consisted of proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances. Uses of cash totaled $5.5 billion and consisted mainly of preferred stock redemptions totaling $2.1 billion, repayments of subsidiary debt totaling $2.0 billion, distributions to noncontrolling interests of $488 million, repayments of BHE senior debt totaling $450 million and net repayments of short-term debt totaling $276 million.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $7.1 billion. Sources of cash totaled $11.7 billion and consisted of proceeds from BHE senior debt issuances of $5.2 billion, proceeds from preferred stock issuances of $3.8 billion and proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances totaling $2.7 billion. Uses of cash totaled $4.5 billion and consisted mainly of $2.8 billion for repayments of subsidiary debt, net repayments of short-term debt of $939 million and $350 million for repayments of BHE senior debt.

Debt Repurchases

The Company may from time to time seek to acquire its outstanding debt securities through cash purchases in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Any debt securities repurchased by the Company may be reissued or resold by the Company from time to time and will depend on prevailing market conditions, the Company's liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Preferred Stock Issuance

On October 29, 2020, BHE issued $3.75 billion of its 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in order to fund the GT&S Cash Consideration and the Q-Pipe Cash Consideration.

Preferred Stock Redemptions

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, BHE redeemed at par 800,006 and 2,100,012 shares of its 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock from certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for $800 million and $2.1 billion.

97


Common Stock Transactions

For the year ended December 31, 2022, BHE purchased 740,961 shares of its common stock held by Mr. Gregory E. Abel, BHE's Chair, for $870 million. The purchase was pursuant to the terms of BHE's Shareholders Agreement.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, BHE repurchased 180,358 shares of its common stock for $126 million.

There were no common stock repurchases for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Future Uses of Cash

The Company has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the issuance of commercial paper, the use of unsecured revolving credit facilities, the issuance of equity and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which BHE and each subsidiary has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including regulatory approvals, its credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry and project finance markets, among other items.

Capital Expenditures

The Company has significant future capital requirements. Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, impacts to customers' rates; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisitions of existing assets.

The Company's historical and forecast capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, by reportable segment for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
PacifiCorp$2,540 $1,513 $2,166 $3,579 $3,069 $3,986 
MidAmerican Funding1,836 1,912 1,869 2,451 2,149 1,791 
NV Energy675 749 1,113 1,614 1,729 1,622 
Northern Powergrid682 742 768 569 632 659 
BHE Pipeline Group659 1,128 1,157 1,001 855 926 
BHE Transmission372 279 200 203 300 433 
BHE Renewables95 225 138 251 399 316 
HomeServices36 42 48 54 57 57 
BHE and Other(1)
(130)21 46 — 
Total$6,765 $6,611 $7,505 $9,726 $9,192 $9,790 
(1)BHE and Other includes intersegment eliminations.

98


HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Wind generation$2,125 $1,339 $774 $2,201 $1,710 $1,197 
Electric distribution1,705 1,679 1,806 1,860 1,732 2,337 
Electric transmission968 823 1,725 1,973 2,154 2,837 
Natural gas transmission and storage6401,068945 824 617 843 
Solar generation16157422 248 630 450 
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage— 23 16 317 392 575 
Other1,311 1,522 1,817 2,303 1,957 1,551 
Total$6,765 $6,611 $7,505 $9,726 $9,192 $9,790 

The Company's historical and forecast capital expenditures consisted mainly of the following:
Wind generation includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for the following:
Construction and acquisition of wind-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy totaling $72 million for 2022, $540 million for 2021 and $848 million for 2020. MidAmerican Energy placed in-service 294 MWs during 2021 and 729 MWs during 2020. All of these wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in 2021 and 2020 qualify for 100% of PTCs available. PTCs from these projects are excluded from MidAmerican Energy's Iowa EAC until these generation assets are reflected in base rates. Planned spending for the construction of wind-powered generating facilities totals $1,232 million in 2023, $1,032 million in 2024 and $740 million in 2025.
Repowering of wind-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy totaling $500 million for 2022, $354 million for 2021 and $37 million for 2020. Planned spending for repowering totals $20 million in 2023, $179 million in 2024 and $84 million in 2025. MidAmerican Energy expects its repowered facilities to meet IRS guidelines for the re-establishment of PTCs for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service.
Construction of new wind-powered generating facilities and construction at existing wind-powered generating facility sites acquired from third parties at PacifiCorp totaling $23 million for 2022, $118 million for 2021 and $1,148 million for 2020. PacifiCorp placed in-service 516 MWs of new wind-powered generating facilities in 2021 and 674 MWs in 2020. Planned spending for the construction of additional new wind-powered generating facilities and those at acquired sites totals $771 million in 2023, $385 million in 2024 and $251 million in 2025 and is primarily for projects totaling approximately 683 MWs that are expected to be placed in-service in 2023 through 2025.
Construction of wind-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables totaling $155 million for 2021. In May 2021, BHE Renewables completed the asset acquisition of a 54-MW wind-powered generating facility located in Iowa. In December 2021, BHE Renewables completed asset acquisitions of 158-MW and 200-MW wind-powered generating facilities located in Texas.
Repowering of wind-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables totaling $45 million for 2022. Planned spending for repowering totals $50 million in 2023.
Electric distribution includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for new customer connections and enhancements to existing customer connections. Operating expenditures include spending for ongoing distribution systems infrastructure needed at the Utilities and Northern Powergrid, wildfire mitigation, storm damage restoration and repairs and investments in routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
99


Electric transmission includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for the following:
PacifiCorp's transmission investment primarily reflects planned costs for the following Energy Gateway Transmission segments: the 416-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Aeolus substation near Medicine Bow, Wyoming and the Clover substation near Mona, Utah; the 59-mile, 230-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Windstar substation near Glenrock, Wyoming and the Aeolus substation; the 290-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line from the Longhorn substation near Boardman, Oregon to the Hemingway substation near Boise, Idaho; the 14-mile, 345-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Oquirrh substation in the Salt Lake Valley and the Terminal substation near the Salt Lake City Airport; the 40-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Limber substation in central Utah and the Terminal substation; and the195-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Anticline substation near Point of Rocks, Wyoming and the Populus substation in Downey, Idaho. Planned spending for these Energy Gateway Transmission segments that are expected to be placed in-service in 2024 through 2028 totals $1,005 million in 2023, $661 million in 2024 and $763 million in 2025.
Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Planned spending for the expansion programs estimated to be placed in-service in 2026-2028 totals $46 million in 2023, $380 million in 2024 and $502 million in 2025.
Operating expenditures include spending for system reinforcement, upgrades and replacements of facilities to maintain system reliability and investments in routine expenditures for transmission needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Natural gas transmission and storage includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include, among other items, spending for asset modernization and the Northern Natural Gas Twin Cities Area Expansion and Spraberry Compression projects. Operating expenditures include, among other items, spending for pipeline integrity projects, automation and controls upgrades, corrosion control, unit exchanges, compressor modifications, projects related to Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration natural gas storage rules and natural gas transmission, storage and LNG terminalling infrastructure needs to serve existing and expected demand.
Solar generation includes growth expenditures, including spending for the following:
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at PacifiCorp totaling 377 MWs of new generation and are expected to be placed in-service in 2026. Planned spending totals $381 million from 2023 through 2025.
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy totaling 141 MWs of small- and utility-scale solar generation, all of which were placed in-service in 2022, with total spend of $119 million in 2022 and $132 million in 2021.
Construction of solar-powered generating facility at the Nevada Utilities includes expenditures for a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada, with commercial operation expected by the end of 2023.
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables' includes expenditures for a 48-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 52 MWs of capacity of co-located battery storage in Kern County, California, with commercial operation expected by November 30, 2024. Planned spending totals $174 million in 2024.
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage includes growth expenditures, including spending for the following:
Construction of 38 MWs of new pumped hydro storage on the North Umpqua River system expected to be placed in-service in 2024 and 2026 as well as other battery storage projects providing approximately 419 MWs of storage that are expected to be placed in-service in 2026 at PacifiCorp. Planned spending for these project totals $398 million from 2023 through 2025. Planned spending for other pumped hydro storage projects that are expected to be placed in-service beyond 2026 totals $95 million from 2023 through 2025
100


Construction at the Nevada Utilities of a 100-MW battery energy storage system co-located with a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada and a 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada, both with commercial operation expected by the end of 2023. Also, a 200-MW battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the Valmy generating station in Humboldt County, Nevada with commercial operation expected by the end of 2025.
Other capital expenditures includes both growth and operating expenditures, including spending for routine expenditures for generation and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand, natural gas distribution, technology, and environmental spending relating to emissions control equipment and the management of CCR.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has certain investments that are accounted for under the equity method in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, an amount is recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as an equity investment and is increased or decreased for the Company's pro-rata share of earnings or losses, respectively, less any dividends from such investments. Certain equity investments are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of investment tax credits.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company's investments that are accounted for under the equity method had short- and long-term debt of $2.7 billion, unused revolving credit facilities of $122 million and letters of credit outstanding of $88 million. As of December 31, 2022, the Company's pro-rata share of such short- and long-term debt was $1.3 billion, unused revolving credit facilities was $61 million and outstanding letters of credit was $43 million. The entire amount of the Company's pro-rata share of the outstanding short- and long-term debt and unused revolving credit facilities is non-recourse to the Company. The entire amount of the Company's pro-rata share of the outstanding letters of credit is recourse to the Company. Although the Company is generally not required to support debt service obligations of its equity investees, default with respect to this non-recourse short- and long-term debt could result in a loss of invested equity.

Material Cash Requirements
The Company has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise primarily from long- and short-term debt (refer to Note 9, 10 and 11), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 6), firm commitments (refer to Note 16), letters of credit (refer to Note 9), construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7), uncertain tax positions (refer to Note 12) and AROs (refer to Note 14). Refer, where applicable, to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

The Company has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $35.1 billion on long-term debt, including $2.2 billion due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters

The Company is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding the Company's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

Quad Cities Generating Station Operating Status

Constellation Energy Generation, LLC ("Constellation Energy"), the operator of Quad Cities Generating Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station") of which MidAmerican Energy has a 25% ownership interest, receives financial support for continued operation of Quad Cities Station from the zero emission standard enacted by the Illinois legislature in December 2016. The zero emission standard requires the Illinois Power Agency to purchase ZECs and recover the costs from certain ratepayers in Illinois, subject to certain limitations. The proceeds from the ZECs provide Constellation Energy additional revenue through 2027 as an incentive for continued operation of Quad Cities Station. MidAmerican Energy does not receive additional revenue from the subsidy.

101


The PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ("PJM") capacity market includes a Minimum Offer Price Rule ("MOPR"). If a generation resource is subjected to a MOPR, its offer price in the market is adjusted to effectively remove the revenues it receives through a state government-provided financial support program like the Illinois zero emission standard, resulting in a higher offer that may not clear the capacity market. Prior to December 19, 2019, the PJM MOPR applied only to certain new gas-fueled resources.

On December 19, 2019, the FERC issued an order requiring the PJM to broadly apply the MOPR to all new and existing resources, including nuclear. This greatly expanded the breadth and scope of the PJM's MOPR, which became effective as of the PJM's capacity auction for the 2022-2023 planning year. While the FERC included some limited exemptions, no exemptions were available to state-supported nuclear resources, such as Quad Cities Station. The FERC denied rehearing of that order on April 16, 2020. A number of parties, including Constellation Energy, have filed petitions for review of the FERC's orders in this proceeding, which remain pending before the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. MidAmerican Energy cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.

While this litigation is pending, the MOPR applied to Quad Cities Station in the capacity auction for the 2022-2023 planning year in May 2021, which prevented Quad Cities Station from clearing in that capacity auction.

At the direction of the PJM Board of Managers, the PJM and its stakeholders developed further MOPR reforms to ensure that the capacity market rules respect and accommodate state resource preferences such as the ZEC programs. The PJM filed related tariff revisions with the FERC on July 30, 2021, and, on September 29, 2021, the PJM's proposed MOPR reforms became effective by operation of law. Under the new tariff provisions, the MOPR applied in the capacity auction for the 2023-2024 delivery year but did not restrict the offers of Quad Cities Station, which cleared in the capacity auction. Requests for rehearing of the FERC's notice establishing the effective date for the PJM's proposed market reforms were filed in October 2021 and denied by operation of law on November 4, 2021. Several parties have filed petitions for review of the FERC's orders in this proceeding, which remain pending before the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Assuming the continued effectiveness of the Illinois zero emission standard, Constellation Energy no longer considers Quad Cities Station to be at heightened risk for early retirement. However, to the extent the Illinois zero emission standard does not operate as expected over its full term, Quad Cities Station would be at heightened risk for early retirement. The FERC provided no new mechanism for accommodating state-supported resources like Quad Cities Station other than the existing Fixed Resource Requirement ("FRR") mechanism under which an entire utility zone would be removed from PJM's capacity auction along with sufficient resources to support the load in such zone. Depending on the outcome of the proceedings related to the PJM MOPR, the continued effectiveness of the Illinois zero emission standard may be undermined unless the PJM adopts further changes to the MOPR or Illinois implements an FRR mechanism, under which Quad Cities Station would be removed from the PJM's capacity auction.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

The Company is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state, local and international agencies. The Company believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and the Company is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt of BHE and debt and preferred securities of certain of its subsidiaries are rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of the rated company's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt or preferred securities. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.

102


BHE and its subsidiaries have no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. The Company's unsecured revolving credit facilities do not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon their availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facilities are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, the applicable entities' credit ratings from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2022, the Company would have been required to post $704 million of additional collateral. The Company's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors.

Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where BHE's subsidiaries operate have not had a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial results. In the U.S. and Canada, the Regulated Businesses operate under cost-of-service based rate-setting structures administered by various state and provincial commissions and the FERC. Under these rate-setting structures, the Regulated Businesses are allowed to include prudent costs in their rates, including the impact of inflation. The price control formula used by the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies incorporates the rate of inflation in determining rates charged to customers. BHE's subsidiaries attempt to minimize the potential impact of inflation on their operations through the use of fuel, energy and other cost adjustment clauses and bill riders, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by the Company's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

The Regulated Businesses prepare their financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, the Regulated Businesses defer the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

103


The Company continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit the Regulated Businesses' ability to recover their costs. The Company believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at the federal, state and provincial levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $5.1 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $7.4 billion as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Regulated Businesses' regulatory assets and liabilities.

Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

The Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022 includes goodwill of acquired businesses of $11.5 billion. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31, 2022. Additionally, no indicators of impairment were identified as of December 31, 2022. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. The Company uses a variety of methods to estimate a reporting unit's fair value, principally discounted projected future net cash flows. Key assumptions used include, but are not limited to, the use of estimated future cash flows; multiples of earnings or rate base; and an appropriate discount rate. Estimated future cash flows are impacted by, among other factors, growth rates, changes in regulations and rates, ability to renew contracts and estimates of future commodity prices. In estimating future cash flows, the Company incorporates current market information, as well as historical factors.

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a majority of all property, plant and equipment is used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the purposes of impairment analysis, requires the exercise of judgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of fair value or the recoverable amount of an asset may include significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect the Company's results of operations.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Certain of the Company's subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans that cover the majority of employees. The Company recognizes the funded status of the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Funded status is the fair value of plan assets minus the benefit obligation as of the measurement date. As of December 31, 2022, the Company recognized a net asset totaling $206 million for the funded status of the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As of December 31, 2022, amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that were included in net regulatory assets totaled $376 million and in AOCI totaled $527 million.

The expense and benefit obligations relating to these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are based on actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and healthcare cost trend rates. These key assumptions are reviewed annually and modified as appropriate. The Company believes that the key assumptions utilized in recording obligations under the plans are reasonable based on prior plan experience and current market and economic conditions. Refer to Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosures about the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the key assumptions used to calculate the funded status and net periodic benefit cost for these plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022.

104


The Company chooses a discount rate based upon high quality debt security investment yields in effect as of the measurement date that corresponds to the expected benefit period. The pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities increase as the discount rate is reduced.

In establishing its assumption as to the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company utilizes the expected asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets. Pension and other postretirement benefits expense increases as the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets decreases. The Company regularly reviews its actual asset allocations and rebalances its investments to its targeted allocations when considered appropriate.

The Company chooses a healthcare cost trend rate that reflects the near and long-term expectations of increases in medical costs and corresponds to the expected benefit payment periods. The healthcare cost trend rate is assumed to gradually decline to 5.00% by 2028, at which point the rate of increase is assumed to remain constant.

The key assumptions used may differ materially from period to period due to changing market and economic conditions. These differences may result in a significant impact to pension and other postretirement benefits expense and funded status. If changes were to occur for the following key assumptions, the approximate effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements would be as follows (dollars in millions):
Domestic Plans
Other PostretirementUnited Kingdom
Pension PlansBenefit PlansPension Plan
+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%
Effect on December 31, 2022
Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate$(76)$82 $(21)$23 $(75)$86 
Effect on 2022 Periodic Cost:
Discount rate$$(3)$$(1)$(4)$
Expected rate of return on plan assets(13)13 (4)(7)

A variety of factors affect the funded status of the plans, including asset returns, discount rates, mortality assumptions, plan changes and the Company's funding policy for each plan.

Income Taxes

In determining the Company's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by the Company's various regulatory jurisdictions.commissions. The Company's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state, local and foreign income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of the Company's federal, state, local and foreign income tax examinations is uncertain, the Company believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations if any, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial results. The Company's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in accrued property, income and other taxes and other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, relatedRefer to uncertain tax positions are included as a componentNote 12 of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


New Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2018-02, which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 220, "Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income." The amendments in this guidance require a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for the stranded tax effects that were created from the enactment of the 2017 Tax Reform. The reclassification is the difference between the historical income tax rates and the enacted rate for the items previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively to each period(s) in which the effect of the change in the 2017 Tax Reform is recognized. Considering the significant components of the Company's accumulated other comprehensive income relate to (a) unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits of foreign pension plans and (b) unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, which were reclassified as required by ASU No. 2016-01 that was adopted on January 1, 2018, the adoption of ASU No. 2018-02 will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, which amends FASB ASC Topic 815, "Derivatives and Hedging." The amendmentsStatements in Item 8 of this guidance update the hedge accounting model to enable entities to better portray the economics of their risk management activities in the financial statements, expands an entity's ability to hedge non-financial and financial risk components and reduces complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk. In addition, it eliminates the requirement to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change in fair value of a hedging instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item and also eases certain documentation and assessment requirements. This guidance is effectiveForm 10-K for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, which amends FASB ASC Topic 715, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits." The amendments in this guidance require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statement of operations separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of operating income. Additionally, the guidance only allows the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. This guidance must be adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of operations and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component in the balance sheet. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, which amends FASB ASC Subtopic 230-10, “Statement of Cash Flows - Overall.” The amendments in this guidance require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, which amends FASB ASC Topic 230, "Statement of Cash Flows." The amendments in this guidance address the classification of eight specific cash flow issues within the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, which creates FASB ASC Topic 842, "Leases" and supersedes Topic 840 "Leases." This guidance increases transparency and comparability among entities by recording lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. A lessee should recognize in the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-01 that provides for an optional transition practical expedient allowing companies to not have to evaluate existing land easements if they were not previously accounted for under ASC Topic 840, "Leases." This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. The Company plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2019 and is currently evaluating the impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, which amends FASB ASC Subtopic 825-10, "Financial Instruments - Overall." The amendments in this guidance address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments including a requirement that all investments in equity securities that do not qualify for equity method accounting or result in consolidation of the investee be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption not permitted, and is required to be adopted prospectively by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 with a cumulative-effect increase to retained earnings of $1,085 million and a corresponding decrease to AOCI.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which creates FASB ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and supersedes ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition." The guidance replaces industry-specific guidance and establishes a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, the guidance requires the entity to disclose further quantitative and qualitativeadditional information regarding the natureCompany's income taxes.

It is probable the Company's regulated businesses will pass income tax benefit and amountexpense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of revenues arising from contracts with customers,2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to their customers. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as well as other information abouta net regulatory liability of $2.5 billion and will be included in regulated rates when the significant judgmentstemporary differences reverse.

105


The Company has not established deferred income taxes on its undistributed foreign earnings that have been determined by management to be reinvested indefinitely; however, the Company periodically evaluates its capital requirements. If circumstances change in the future and estimates used in recognizing revenues from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 one year to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued several ASUs that clarify the implementation guidance for ASU No. 2014-09 but do not change the core principlea portion of the guidance. This guidanceCompany's undistributed foreign earnings were repatriated, the dividends may be adopted retrospectively or under a modified retrospective method wheresubject to taxation in the cumulative effectU.S. but the tax is not expected to be material.

Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue

Revenue recognized at the date of initial application. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method and the adoption will not have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements but will increase the disclosures included within Notesis equal to Consolidated Financial Statements. The timing and amount of revenue recognized after adoption of the new guidance will not be different than before as a majority of revenue is recognized whenwhat the Company has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company's performance to date. date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. The determination of customer invoices is based on a systematic reading of meters, fixed reservation charges based on contractual quantities and rates or, in the case of the Great Britain distribution businesses, when information is received from the national settlement system. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $828 million as of December 31, 2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Unbilled revenue is reversed in the following month and billed revenue is recorded based on the subsequent meter readings.

Wildfire Loss Contingencies

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in the Company's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, the Company is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the wildfires. In determining this exposure, the Company is required to assess whether the likelihood of loss for each of the wildfires and lawsuits is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with various parties. If deemed reasonably possible, the Company is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts. If deemed probable, the Company is required to accrue a loss if reasonably estimable based on the bottom end of the range if no amount within the range of estimated loss is any better than another amount. Many assumptions and variables are involved in determining these estimates, including identifying the various categories of potential loss such as fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. Within the categories of potential loss, further assumptions are made regarding items such as the types of structures damaged, estimated replacement values associated with those structures, value of personal property, the types of natural resource damage such as timber, the value of that timber, the nature of noneconomic damages such as those arising from personal injuries, other damages the Company may be responsible for if found negligent such as punitive damages, and the amount of any penalties or fines that may be imposed by governmental entities. Refer to Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Company's loss contingencies associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney fire.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company's current planConsolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. The Company's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates, equity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which the Company transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with the Company's business activities. Each of the Company's business platforms has established guidelines for credit risk management.

106


Commodity Price Risk

The Company is principally exposed to quantitatively disaggregate revenueelectricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk primarily through BHE's ownership of the Utilities as they have an obligation to serve retail customer load in their regulated service territories. The Company also provides nonregulated retail electricity and natural gas services in competitive markets. The Utilities' load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required financial statement footnoteto generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, regulated energy, nonregulated energyamong many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage and real estate, with further disaggregationtransmission and transportation constraints. The Company does not engage in a material amount of regulated energy by customer class and lineproprietary trading activities. To manage a portion of business and real estate by line of business.

(3)    Business Acquisitions

In 2017,its commodity price risk, the Company completed various acquisitions totaling $1.1 billion,uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. The Company does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. The Company's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates, which is subject to regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.

The table that follows summarizes the Company's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives, excluding collateral netting of $(88) million and $26 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices with the contracted or expected volumes. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions).
Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts$335 $520 $150 
Designated as hedging contracts12 40 (16)
Total commodity derivative contracts$347 $560 $134 
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts$20 $116 $(76)
Designated as hedging contracts(10)(5)(15)
Total commodity derivative contracts$10 $111 $(91)

The settled cost of certain of the Company's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts is included in regulated rates and, therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose the Company to earnings volatility. Consolidated financial results would be negatively impacted if the costs of cash acquired. The purchase price for each acquisitionwholesale electricity, wholesale natural gas or fuel are higher than what is included in regulated rates, including the impacts of adjustment mechanisms. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a net regulatory liability of $231 million and a net regulatory asset of $71 million, respectively, was allocatedrecorded related to the assets acquirednet derivative asset of $335 million and liabilities assumed, which$20 million, respectively. For the Company's commodity derivative contracts designated as hedging contracts, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts, to the extent the hedge is considered effective, generally do not expose the Company to earnings volatility.

107


Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt, future debt issuances and mortgage commitments. The Company manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily related to residential real estate brokerage businesses, developmentthrough the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and construction costs for the 110-megawatt Alamo 6 and the 50-megawatt Pearl solar projects, and the remaining 25%by monitoring market changes in interest in the Silverhawk natural gas-fueled generation facility at Nevada Power.rates. As a result of the various acquisitions,fixed interest rates, the Company's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose the Company acquired assets of $1.1 billion, assumed liabilities of $487 million and recognized goodwill of $508 million.

In 2016 and 2015, the Company completed various acquisitions totaling $66 million and $164 million, net of cash acquired, respectively. The purchase price for each acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The assets acquired consistedrisk of property, plant and equipment, development and construction costs for renewable projects, other working capital items, goodwill of $50 million and $33 million, respectively, and other identifiable intangible assets. The liabilities assumed totaled $54 million and $84 million, respectively.

(4)Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
 Depreciable    
 Life 2017 2016
Regulated assets:     
Utility generation, transmission and distribution systems5-80 years $74,660
 $71,536
Interstate natural gas pipeline assets3-80 years 7,176
 6,942
   81,836
 78,478
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (24,478) (23,603)
Regulated assets, net  57,358
 54,875
      
Nonregulated assets:     
Independent power plants5-30 years 6,010
 5,594
Other assets3-30 years 1,489
 1,002
   7,499
 6,596
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (1,542) (1,060)
Nonregulated assets, net  5,957
 5,536
      
Net operating assets  63,315
 60,411
Construction work-in-progress  2,556
 2,098
Property, plant and equipment, net  $65,871
 $62,509

Construction work-in-progress includes $2.2 billion and $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, relatedloss due to the construction of regulated assets.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, MidAmerican Energy revised its electric and gas depreciation rates based on the results of a new depreciation study, the most significant impact of which was longer estimated useful lives for certain wind-powered generating facilities. The effect of this change was to reduce depreciation and amortization expense by $3 millionchanges in 2016 and $34 million annually based on depreciable plant balancesmarket interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at the time of the change.



(5)
Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements, the Domestic Regulated Businesses, as tenants in common, have undivided interests in jointly owned generation, transmission, distribution and pipeline common facilities. The Company accounts for its proportionate share of each facility and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include the Company's share of the expenses of these facilities.

The amounts shown in the table below represent the Company's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2017 (dollars in millions):
     Accumulated Construction
 Company Facility In Depreciation and Work-in-
 Share Service Amortization Progress
PacifiCorp:       
Jim Bridger Nos. 1-467% $1,442
 $616
 $12
Hunter No. 194
 474
 172
 7
Hunter No. 260
 297
 106
 1
Wyodak80
 469
 216
 1
Colstrip Nos. 3 and 410
 247
 131
 4
Hermiston50
 180
 81
 1
Craig Nos. 1 and 219
 365
 231
 3
Hayden No. 125
 74
 34
 
Hayden No. 213
 43
 21
 
Foote Creek79
 40
 26
 
Transmission and distribution facilitiesVarious 794
 238
 67
Total PacifiCorp  4,425
 1,872
 96
MidAmerican Energy:       
Louisa No. 188% 807
 432
 8
Quad Cities Nos. 1 and 2(1)
25
 698
 387
 20
Walter Scott, Jr. No. 379
 617
 316
 8
Walter Scott, Jr. No. 4(2)
60
 456
 112
 1
George Neal No. 441
 307
 159
 1
Ottumwa No. 152
 567
 206
 40
George Neal No. 372
 425
 183
 7
Transmission facilitiesVarious 249
 87
 1
Total MidAmerican Energy  4,126
 1,882
 86
NV Energy:       
Navajo11% 220
 152
 
Valmy50
 388
 233
 1
Transmission facilitiesVarious 206
 45
 
Total NV Energy  814
 430
 1
BHE Pipeline Group - common facilities
Various 286
 169
 
Total  $9,651
 $4,353
 $183

(1)Includes amounts related to nuclear fuel.
(2)
Facility in-service and accumulated depreciation and amortization amounts are net of credits applied under Iowa revenue sharing arrangements totaling $319 million and $81 million, respectively.

(6)Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future regulated rates. The Company's regulatory assets reflectedfair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, consistchanges in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if the Company were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of the followingCompany's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 9, 10, 11, and 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of the Company's short and long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $3.2 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively, that expose the Company to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, (in millions):2022 and 2021.

 Weighted    
 Average    
 Remaining Life 2017 2016
      
Employee benefit plans(1)
16 years
 $675
 $816
Asset disposition costsVarious 387
 281
Asset retirement obligations13 years
 334
 301
Abandoned projects3 years
 156
 159
Deferred operating costs13 years
 147
 97
Deferred income taxes(2)
Various 143
 1,754
Unrealized loss on regulated derivative contracts4 years
 122
 154
Unamortized contract values6 years
 89
 98
Deferred net power costs2 years
 58
 38
OtherVarious 839
 759
Total regulatory assets  $2,950
 $4,457
      
Reflected as:     
Current assets  $189
 $150
Noncurrent assets  2,761
 4,307
Total regulatory assets  $2,950
 $4,457

(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.

(2)Amounts primarily represent income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

The Company may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, forward sale commitments or mortgage interest rate lock commitments, to mitigate the Company's exposure to interest rate risk. Changes in fair value of agreements designated as cash flow hedges are reported in AOCI to the extent the hedge is effective until the forecasted transaction occurs. Changes in fair value of agreements not designated as hedging contracts are recognized in earnings. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had regulatory assets not earning a return on investmentvariable-to-fixed interest rate swaps with notional amounts of $1.1 billion$481 million and $2.8 billion$533 million, respectively, and £272 million and £174 million, respectively, to protect the Company against an increase in interest rates. Additionally, as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively.


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent income2021, the Company had mortgage commitments, net, with notional amounts of $438 million and $1,512 million, respectively, to be recognized or amounts to be returned to customersprotect the Company against an increase in future periods.interest rates. The Company's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consistfair value of the followingCompany's interest rate derivative contracts was a net derivative asset of $108 million and $16 million as of December 31, (in millions):2022 and 2021, respectively. A hypothetical 10 basis point increase and a 10 basis point decrease in interest rates would not have a material impact on the Company.

The Company holds foreign currency swaps with the purpose of hedging the foreign currency exchange rate associated with Euro denominated debt. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had €250 million in aggregate notional amounts of these foreign currency swaps outstanding. A hypothetical 10% decrease in market interest rates would not have resulted in a material decrease in fair value of the Company's foreign currency swaps as of December 31.

Equity Price Risk

Market prices for equity securities are subject to fluctuation and consequently the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investee, the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions.

108


 Weighted    
 Average    
 Remaining Life 2017 2016
      
Deferred income taxes(1)
Various $4,143
 $25
Cost of removal(2)
27 years
 2,349
 2,242
Levelized depreciation22 years
 332
 244
Asset retirement obligations35 years
 177
 122
Impact fees6 years
 89
 90
Employee benefit plans(3)
11 years
 69
 25
Deferred net power costs2 years
 8
 64
Unrealized gain on regulated derivative contracts1 year
 3
 6
OtherVarious 341
 302
Total regulatory liabilities  $7,511
 $3,120
      
Reflected as:     
Current liabilities  $202
 $187
Noncurrent liabilities  7,309
 2,933
Total regulatory liabilities  $7,511
 $3,120
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited common stock represented approximately 86% and 92%, respectively, of the total fair value of the Company's equity securities. The majority of the Company's remaining equity securities are held in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets and the realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates. The following table summarizes the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and the effects of a hypothetical 30% increase and a 30% decrease in market price as of those dates. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions).

(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. See Note 11 for further discussion of 2017 Tax Reform impacts.
(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.
(3)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are to be returned to customers in future periods when recognized.

EstimatedHypothetical
HypotheticalFair Value afterPercentage Increase
FairPriceHypothetical(Decrease) in BHE
ValueChangeChange in PricesShareholders' Equity
As of December 31, 2022$3,763 30% increase$4,892 %
30% decrease2,634 (1)
As of December 31, 2021$7,693 30% increase$10,001 %
30% decrease5,385 (3)
ALP General Tariff Application ("GTA")

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

BHE's business operations and investments outside of the U.S. increase its risk related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates primarily in relation to the British pound and the Canadian dollar. BHE's reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, and the value of the assets and liabilities, earnings, cash flows and potential distributions from BHE's foreign operations changes with the fluctuations of the currency in which they transact.

Northern Powergrid's functional currency is the British pound. As of December 31, 2022, a 10% devaluation in the British pound to the U.S. dollar would result in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet being negatively impacted by a $491 million cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI. A 10% devaluation in the average currency exchange rate would have resulted in lower reported earnings for Northern Powergrid of $39 million in 2022.

BHE Canada's functional currency is the Canadian dollar. As of December 31, 2022, a 10% devaluation in the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar would result in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet being negatively impacted by a $387 million cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI. A 10% devaluation in the average currency exchange rate would have resulted in lower reported earnings for BHE Canada of $18 million in 2022.

Credit Risk

Domestic Regulated Operations

The Utilities are exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent the Utilities' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, the Utilities analyze the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establish limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluate the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, the Utilities enter into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, the Utilities exercise rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp's aggregate credit exposure with wholesale energy supply and marketing counterparties included counterparties having non-investment grade, internally rated credit ratings. Substantially all of these non-investment grade, internally rated counterparties are associated with long-duration solar and wind power purchase agreements, some of which are from facilities that have not yet achieved commercial operation and for which PacifiCorp has no obligation should the facilities not achieve commercial operation.

109


Substantially all of MidAmerican Energy's electric wholesale sales revenue results from participation in RTOs, including the MISO and the PJM. MidAmerican Energy's share of historical losses from defaults by other RTO market participants has not been material. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, MidAmerican Energy's aggregate direct credit exposure from electric wholesale marketing counterparties was not material.

As of December 31, 2022, NV Energy's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral, was not material.

BHE GT&S primary customers include electric and natural gas distribution utilities and LNG export, import and storage customers. Northern Natural Gas' primary customers include utilities in the upper Midwest. Kern River's primary customers are electric and natural gas distribution utilities, major oil and natural gas companies or affiliates of such companies, electric generating companies, energy marketing and trading companies and financial institutions. As a general policy, collateral is not required for receivables from creditworthy customers. Customers' financial condition and creditworthiness, as defined by the tariff, are regularly evaluated and historical losses have been minimal. In November 2014, ALP filed a GTA requestingorder to provide protection against credit risk, and as permitted by the Alberta Utilities Commission ("AUC")separate terms of each of BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas' and Kern River's tariffs, the companies have required customers that lack creditworthiness to approve revenueprovide cash deposits, letters of credit or other security until they meet the creditworthiness requirements of C$811 millionthe respective tariff.

Northern Powergrid

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies charge fees for 2015the use of their distribution systems to supply companies. The supply companies purchase electricity from generators and C$1.0 billion for 2016, primarily duetraders, sell the electricity to continued investment in capital projects as directed by the Alberta Electric System Operator. ALP amended the GTA in June 2015 to propose transmission tariff relief measures forend-use customers and modifications to its capital structure. ALP also amended and updateduse the GTA in October 2015, reducing the requested revenue requirements to C$672 million for 2015 and C$704 million for 2016. In May 2016, the AUC issued its decision pertainingNorthern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution networks pursuant to the 2015-2016 GTA. ALP filedmultilateral "Distribution Connection and Use of System Agreement." The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' customers are concentrated in a small number of electricity supply businesses. During 2022, E.ON and certain of its 2015-2016 GTAaffiliates and British Gas Trading Limited represented approximately 22% and 14%, respectively, of the total combined distribution revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies. The industry operates in accordance with a framework which sets credit limits for each supply business based on its credit rating or payment history and requires them to provide credit cover if their value at risk (measured as being equivalent to 45 days usage) exceeds the credit limit. Acceptable credit typically is provided in the form of a parent company guarantee, letter of credit or an escrow account. Ofgem has indicated that, provided the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies have implemented credit control, billing and collection in line with best practice guidelines and can demonstrate compliance filing in July 2016 to comply with the AUC's decision.guidelines or are able to satisfactorily explain departure from the guidelines, any bad debt losses arising from supplier default will be recovered through an increase in future allowed income. Losses incurred to date have not been material.


The compliance filing requestedBHE Canada

AltaLink's primary source of operating revenue is the AUCAESO, an entity rated AA- by Standard and Poor's. Because of the dependence on a single customer, any material failure of the customer to approve revenue requirements of C$599 million for 2015fulfill its obligations would significantly impair AltaLink's ability to meet its existing and C$685 million for 2016. The decreased revenue requirements requested in the compliance filing, as compared to the 2015-2016 GTA filing updated in October 2015, were primarily due to the AUC approval of ALP's proposed immediate tariff relief of C$415 million for customers for 2015 and 2016, through (i) the discontinuance of construction work-in-progress ("CWIP") in rate base and the return to allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC") accounting effective January 1, 2015, resulting in a C$82 million reduction of revenue requirement and the refund of C$277 million previously collected as CWIP in rate base as part of ALP's transmission tariffs during 2011-2014 less related returns of C$12 million and (ii) a change to the flow through method for calculating income taxes for 2016, resulting in further tariff relief of C$68 million.


Operatingfuture obligations. Total operating revenue for the year ended December 31, 2016, included a one-time reduction of $200 million from the 2015-2016 GTA decision received in May 2016 at ALP. The 2015-2016 GTA decision required ALP to refund $200 million to customers in 2016 through reduced monthly billings for the change from receiving cash during construction for the return on CWIP in rate base to recording allowance for borrowed and equity funds used during construction related to construction expenditures during the 2011 to 2014 time period. This amount is offset with higher capitalized interest and allowance for equity funds in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the decision required ALP to change to the flow through method of recognizing income tax expense effective January 1, 2016. This change reduced operating revenue by $45AltaLink was $681 million for the year ended December 31, 2016,2022.

BHE Renewables

BHE Renewables owns independent power projects that generally have separate project financing agreements. These projects source of operating revenue is derived primarily from long-term power purchase agreements with offsetting impacts to income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(7)Investmentssingle customers, primarily utilities, which expire between 2023 and Restricted Cash and Investments

Investments and restricted cash and investments consists2043. Because of the followingdependence generally from a single customer at each project, any material failure of the customer to fulfill its obligations would significantly impair that project's ability to meet its existing and future obligations. Total operating revenue for BHE Renewables was $994 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.

110


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

111


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company
Des Moines, Iowa

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, (in millions):
 2017 2016
Investments:   
BYD Company Limited common stock$1,961
 $1,185
Rabbi trusts441
 403
Other124
 106
Total investments2,526
 1,694
    
Equity method investments:   
Tax equity investments1,025
 741
Electric Transmission Texas, LLC524
 672
Bridger Coal Company137
 165
Other148
 142
Total equity method investments1,834
 1,720
    
Restricted cash and investments:   
Quad Cities Station nuclear decommissioning trust funds515
 460
Other348
 282
Total restricted cash and investments863
 742
    
Total investments and restricted cash and investments$5,223
 $4,156
    
Reflected as:   
Current assets$351
 $211
Noncurrent assets4,872
 3,945
Total investments and restricted cash and investments$5,223
 $4,156

Investments

BHE's investment in BYD Company Limited common stock is accounted for as an available-for-sale security with2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in fair valueequity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.


Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 7 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company is subject to rate regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as well as certain other regulatory commissions (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the electric and natural gas rates of the Company's regulated businesses in the respective service territories where the Company operates. Management has determined its regulated operations meet the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.
112


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow the Company an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While the Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit the Company's ability to recover their costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, and (3) refunds to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the future outcome of decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated the Company's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.

Wildfires — Contingencies — See Note 16 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in the Company's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, the Company is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire (the "Wildfires"). In determining this exposure, the Company is required to determine whether the likelihood of loss for each of the Wildfires is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the Wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with claimants.

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If deemed reasonably possible, the Company is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts.

Management has recorded estimated liabilities of $424 million and receivables of $246 million, which represent its best estimate of probable losses and expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized in AOCI. Upon adoptionprobable losses, net of ASU No. 2016-01 effective January 1, 2018, all changes in fair value (whether realizedexpected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively. Management has disclosed reasonably possible estimated losses of $31 million, net of potential insurance recoveries of $103 million, associated with the 2022 McKinney Fire.

113


We identified wildfire-related contingencies and the related disclosures as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to determine the probability of loss and estimate the probable or unrealized) will be recognized as gains orreasonably possible losses and insurance recoveries. This required the application of a high degree of judgment and extensive effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's judgments, estimates and disclosures related to wildfire-related loss contingencies.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management's judgments regarding the probability of loss, estimated losses and insurance recoveries, and related disclosures for wildfire-related contingencies included the following, among others:
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether a loss was probable or reasonably possible for the Wildfires by inquiring of management and the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding the likelihood and amounts of probable and reasonably possible losses, including the potential impact of information gained through investigations into the cause of the fires, information from claimants, the advice of legal counsel, and reading external information for any evidence that might contradict management's assertions.
We evaluated the estimation methodology for determining the amount of probable and reasonably possible losses through inquiries with management and external and internal legal counsel and we tested the significant assumptions used in the estimates of probable and reasonably possible losses.
We read legal letters from the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding known information and evaluated whether the information therein was consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether related insurance recoveries were probable of collection by inquiring of management and the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding the amounts of insurance recoveries recorded or disclosed. With the assistance of our insurance specialists, we tested the significant assumptions used in the determination of collectability, including obtaining and reading related policies to determine whether the types of insurance claims are included or excluded from coverage.
We evaluated whether the Company's disclosures were appropriate and consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
February 24, 2023

We have served as the Company's auditor since 1991.


114


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$1,591 $1,096 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents2,141 172 
Trade receivables, net2,876 2,468 
Inventories1,256 1,122 
Mortgage loans held for sale474 1,263 
Regulatory assets1,319 544 
Other current assets1,345 1,583 
Total current assets11,002 8,248 
  
Property, plant and equipment, net93,043 89,816 
Goodwill11,489 11,650 
Regulatory assets3,743 3,419 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments11,273 15,788 
Other assets3,290 3,144 
  
Total assets$133,840 $132,065 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
115


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$2,679 $2,136 
Accrued interest558 537 
Accrued property, income and other taxes746 606 
Accrued employee expenses333 372 
Short-term debt1,119 2,009 
Current portion of long-term debt3,201 1,265 
Other current liabilities1,677 1,837 
Total current liabilities10,313 8,762 
  
BHE senior debt13,096 13,003 
BHE junior subordinated debentures100 100 
Subsidiary debt35,238 35,394 
Regulatory liabilities7,070 6,960 
Deferred income taxes12,678 12,938 
Other long-term liabilities4,706 4,319 
Total liabilities83,201 81,476 
  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
  
Equity:  
BHE shareholders' equity:  
Preferred stock - 100 shares authorized, $0.01 par value, 1 and 2 shares issued and outstanding850 1,650 
Common stock - 115 shares authorized, no par value, 76 shares issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital6,298 6,374 
Long-term income tax receivable— (744)
Retained earnings41,833 40,754 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(2,149)(1,340)
Total BHE shareholders' equity46,832 46,694 
Noncontrolling interests3,807 3,895 
Total equity50,639 50,589 
  
Total liabilities and equity$133,840 $132,065 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
116


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Energy$21,069 $18,935 $15,556 
Real estate5,268 6,215 5,396 
Total operating revenue26,337 25,150 20,952 
 
Operating expenses: 
Energy: 
Cost of sales6,757 5,504 4,187 
Operations and maintenance4,217 3,991 3,545 
Depreciation and amortization4,230 3,829 3,410 
Property and other taxes775 789 634 
Real estate5,117 5,710 4,885 
Total operating expenses21,096 19,823 16,661 
  
Operating income5,241 5,327 4,291 
 
Other income (expense): 
Interest expense(2,216)(2,118)(2,021)
Capitalized interest76 64 80 
Allowance for equity funds167 126 165 
Interest and dividend income154 89 71 
(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net(2,002)1,823 4,797 
Other, net(7)(17)88 
Total other income (expense)(3,828)(33)3,180 
  
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss1,413 5,294 7,471 
Income tax (benefit) expense(1,916)(1,132)308 
Equity loss(185)(237)(149)
Net income3,144 6,189 7,014 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests423 399 71 
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders2,721 5,790 6,943 
Preferred dividends46 121 26 
Earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $6,917 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

117


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income$3,144 $6,189 $7,014 
 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $(23), $55 and $(19)(72)174 (65)
Foreign currency translation adjustment(810)(24)234 
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $20, $10 and $(3)76 67 (15)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(806)217 154 
    
Comprehensive income2,338 6,406 7,168 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests426 404 71 
Comprehensive income attributable to BHE shareholders$1,912 $6,002 $7,097 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

118


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)
BHE Shareholders' Equity
Long-termAccumulated
AdditionalIncomeOther
PreferredCommonPaid-inTaxRetainedComprehensiveNoncontrollingTotal
StockStockCapitalReceivableEarningsLoss, NetInterestsEquity
Balance, December 31, 2019$— $— $6,389 $(530)$28,296 $(1,706)$129 $32,578 
Net income— — — — 6,943 — 70 7,013 
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 154 — 154 
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — (128)— — — (128)
Issuance of preferred stock3,750 — — — — — — 3,750 
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (26)— — (26)
Common stock purchases— (6)— (120)— — (126)
Distributions— — — — — — (121)(121)
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — (5)— — — (28)(33)
BHE GT&S acquisition -
   noncontrolling interest
— — — — — — 3,916 3,916 
Other equity transactions— — (1)— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20203,750 — 6,377 (658)35,093 (1,552)3,967 46,977 
Net income— — — — 5,790 — 397 6,187 
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 212 217 
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — (86)(8)— — (94)
Preferred stock redemptions(2,100)— — — — — — (2,100)
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (121)— — (121)
Distributions— — — — — (478)(478)
Contributions— — — — — — 
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — (3)— — — (4)(7)
Other equity transactions— — — — — — (1)(1)
Balance, December 31, 20211,650 — 6,374 (744)40,754 (1,340)3,895 50,589 
Net income— — — — 2,721 — 421 3,142 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — — — — (809)(806)
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — 744 (791)— — (47)
Preferred stock redemptions(800)— — — — — — (800)
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (46)— — (46)
Common stock purchases— — (77)— (793)— — (870)
Distributions— — — — — (522)(522)
Contributions— — — — — — 
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — — — — — 
Other equity transactions— — — (12)— (1)(12)
Balance, December 31, 2022$850 $— $6,298 $— $41,833 $(2,149)$3,807 $50,639 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

119


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$3,144 $6,189 $7,014 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Losses (gains) on marketable securities, net2,002 (1,823)(4,797)
Depreciation and amortization4,286 3,881 3,455 
Allowance for equity funds(167)(126)(165)
Equity loss, net of distributions319 380 248 
Net power cost deferrals(1,290)(520)(62)
Amortization of net power cost deferrals357 107 (5)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(146)(255)(348)
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net(467)646 1,880 
Other, net59 (57)(23)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Trade receivables and other assets20 553 (1,318)
Derivative collateral, net121 82 43 
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(27)(39)(65)
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net397 (489)(134)
Accounts payable and other liabilities751 163 501 
Net cash flows from operating activities9,359 8,692 6,224 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(7,505)(6,611)(6,765)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(314)(122)(2,397)
Purchases of marketable securities(574)(297)(370)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities2,464 273 325 
Purchases of other investments(1,958)(20)(1,323)
Proceeds from other investments1,300 13 
Equity method investments119 (212)(2,724)
Other, net12 (74)76 
Net cash flows from investing activities(7,750)(5,763)(13,165)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock— — 3,750 
Preferred stock redemptions(800)(2,100)— 
Preferred dividends(50)(132)(7)
Common stock purchases(870)— (126)
Proceeds from BHE senior debt986 — 5,212 
Repayments of BHE senior debt— (450)(350)
Proceeds from subsidiary debt2,887 2,409 2,688 
Repayments of subsidiary debt(1,494)(2,024)(2,841)
Net repayments of short-term debt(867)(276)(939)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(524)(488)(122)
Other, net(274)(70)(162)
Net cash flows from financing activities(1,006)(3,131)7,103 
Effect of exchange rate changes(30)15 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents573 (201)177 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1,244 1,445 1,268 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,817 $1,244 $1,445 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
120


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)Organization and Operations

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE") is a holding company that owns a highly diversified portfolio of locally managed and operated businesses principally engaged in the energy industry (collectively with its subsidiaries, the "Company") and is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").

The Company's operations are organized as eight business segments: PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries ("PacifiCorp"), MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries ("MidAmerican Funding") (which primarily consists of MidAmerican Energy Company ("MidAmerican Energy")), NV Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("NV Energy") (which primarily consists of Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") and Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific")), Northern Powergrid Holdings Company and its subsidiaries ("Northern Powergrid") (which primarily consists of Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc), BHE Pipeline Group, LLC and its subsidiaries (which primarily consists of BHE GT&S, LLC and its subsidiaries ("BHE GT&S"), Northern Natural Gas Company ("Northern Natural Gas") and Kern River Gas Transmission Company ("Kern River")), BHE Transmission (which consists of BHE Canada Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries ("BHE Canada") (which primarily consists of AltaLink, L.P. ("AltaLink")) and BHE U.S. Transmission, LLC and its subsidiaries), BHE Renewables, LLC and its subsidiaries ("BHE Renewables") and HomeServices of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("HomeServices"). The Company, through these locally managed and operated businesses, owns four utility companies in the U.S. serving customers in 11 states, two electricity distribution companies in Great Britain, five interstate natural gas pipeline companies and interests in a liquefied natural gas ("LNG") export, import and storage facility in the U.S., an electric transmission business in Canada, interests in electric transmission businesses in the U.S., a renewable energy business primarily investing in wind, solar, geothermal and hydroelectric projects, the largest residential real estate brokerage firm in the U.S. and one of the largest residential real estate brokerage franchise networks in the U.S.

(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of BHE and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. The Consolidated Statements of Operations with a cumulative-effect increase to retained earnings asinclude the revenue and expenses of any acquired entities from the date of adoption totaling $1,085 million. The fair value of BHE's investment in BYD Company Limited common stock reflects a pre-tax unrealized gain of $1,729 million and $953 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Rabbi trusts primarily hold corporate-owned life insurance on certain current and former key executives and directors. The Rabbi trusts were established to hold investments used to fund the obligations of various nonqualified executive and director compensation plans and to pay the costs of the trusts. The amount represents the cash surrender value of all of the policies included in the Rabbi trusts, net of amounts borrowed against the cash surrender value.


Equity Method Investments

acquisition. The Company has investedconsolidates variable interest entities ("VIE") in projects sponsored by third parties, commonly referred to as tax equity investments. Under the terms of these tax equity investments, the Company has entered into equity capital contribution agreements with the project sponsors that require contributions. The Company has made contributions of $403 million, $584 million and $170 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, pursuant to these equity capital contribution agreements as the various projects achieve commercial operation. Once a project achieves commercial operation, the Company enters into a partnership agreement with the project sponsor that directs and allocates the operating profits and tax benefits from the project.

BHE, through a subsidiary, owns 50% of Electric Transmission Texas, LLC, which owns and operates electric transmission assets in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas footprint. BHE, through a subsidiary, owns 66.67% of Bridger Coal Company ("Bridger Coal"), which is a coal mining joint venture that supplies coal to the Jim Bridger Nos. 1-4 generating facility. Bridger Coal is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting asit possesses both (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Bridger Coal'sthe entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are shared withnot limited to, the joint venture partner. See Note 11effects of regulation; impairment of goodwill; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for discussionpension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; fair value of 2017 Tax Reform impacts to equity earnings recordedassets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

121


Accounting for the year ending December 31, 2017.Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific, BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas, Kern River and AltaLink (the "Regulated Businesses") prepare their financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, the Regulated Businesses defer the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Alternative valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist substantially of funds restricted for debt service obligations for certain of the Company's nonregulated renewable energy projects. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$1,591 $1,096 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents173 127 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments53 21 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$1,817 $1,244 

Investments


MidAmerican Energy has establishedFixed Maturity Securities

The Company's management determines the appropriate classification of investments in fixed maturity securities at the acquisition date and reevaluates the classification at each balance sheet date. Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments that management does not intend to use or is restricted from using in current operations are presented as noncurrent on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Available-for-sale investments are carried at fair value with realized gains and losses, as determined on a specific identification basis, recognized in earnings and unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI, net of tax. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates. Trading investments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Held-to-maturity investments are carried at amortized cost, reflecting the ability and intent to hold the securities to maturity. The difference between the original cost and maturity value of a fixed maturity security is amortized to earnings using the interest method.
122



Investment gains and losses arise when investments are sold (as determined on a specific identification basis) or are other-than-temporarily impaired with respect to securities classified as available-for-sale. If the value of a fixed maturity investment declines to below amortized cost and the decline is deemed other than temporary, the amortized cost of the investment is reduced to fair value, with a corresponding charge to earnings. Any resulting impairment loss is recognized in earnings if the Company intends to sell, or expects to be required to sell, the debt security before its amortized cost is recovered. If the Company does not expect to ultimately recover the amortized cost basis even if it does not intend to sell the security, the credit loss component is recognized in earnings and any difference between fair value and the amortized cost basis, net of funds for decommissioning the Quad Cities Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2credit loss, is reflected in other comprehensive income (loss) ("Quad Cities Station"OCI"). TheseFor regulated fixed maturity investments, any impairment charge is offset by the establishment of a regulatory asset to the extent recovery in debt andregulated rates is probable.

Equity Securities

Investments in equity securities are classifiedcarried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as available-for-salea component of gains (losses) on marketable securities, net. All changes in fair value of equity securities in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates.

Equity Method Investments

The Company utilizes the equity method of accounting with respect to investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when the investor possesses more than 20% of the voting interests of the investee. This presumption may be overcome based on specific facts and circumstances that demonstrate that the ability to exercise significant influence is restricted. In applying the equity method, the Company records the investment at cost and subsequently increases or decreases the carrying value of the investment by the Company's share of the net earnings or losses and OCI of the investee. The Company records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment. Certain equity investments are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of related investment tax credits.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are reportedstated at fair value. Funds are investedthe outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on the Company's assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to the Company by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, the Company primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, the Company may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. The change in the trustbalance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in accordance with applicable federal and state investment guidelines and are restrictedtrade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for use as reimbursement for costs of decommissioning the Quad Cities Station, which are currently licensed for operation until December 2032.

(8)Short-Term Debt and Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes BHE's and its subsidiaries' availability under their credit facilities as ofyears ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$108 $77 $44 
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net43 81 56 
Acquisitions— — 
Write-offs, net(45)(50)(28)
Ending balance$106 $108 $77 

Derivatives

The Company employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price, interest rate, and foreign currency exchange rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements. Cash collateral received from or paid to counterparties to secure derivative contract assets or liabilities in excess of amounts offset is included in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

123


     MidAmerican NV Northern      
 BHE PacifiCorp Funding Energy Powergrid AltaLink Other 
Total(1)
2017:               
Credit facilities(2)
$3,600
 $1,000
 $909
 $650
 $203
 $1,054
 $1,635
 $9,051
Less:               
Short-term debt(3,331) (80) 
 
 
 (345) (732) (4,488)
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(7) (130) (370) (80) 
 (7) 
 (594)
Net credit facilities$262
 $790
 $539
 $570
 $203
 $702
 $903
 $3,969
                
2016:               
Credit facilities$2,000
 $1,000
 $609
 $650
 $185
 $986
 $915
 $6,345
Less:               
Short-term debt(834) (270) (99) 
 
 (289) (377) (1,869)
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(7) (142) (220) (80) 
 (8) 
 (457)
Net credit facilities$1,159
 $588
 $290
 $570
 $185
 $689
 $538
 $4,019
Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked-to-market and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(1)The table does not include unused credit facilities and letters of credit for investments that are accounted for under the equity method.

(2)Includes amounts borrowed on a short-term loan totaling $600 million at BHE that was repaid in full in January 2018.

AsFor the Company's derivatives not designated as hedging contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of December 31, 2017,inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For the Company's derivatives not designated as hedging contracts and for which changes in fair value are not recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as operating revenue for sales contracts; cost of sales and operating expense for purchase contracts and electricity, natural gas and fuel swap contracts; and other, net for interest rate swap derivatives.

For the Company's derivatives designated as hedging contracts, the Company wasformally assesses, at inception and thereafter, whether the hedging contract is highly effective in compliance withoffsetting changes in the covenantshedged item. The Company formally documents hedging activity by transaction type and risk management strategy.

Changes in the estimated fair value of its credit facilitiesa derivative contract designated and letter of credit arrangements.


BHE

BHE hasqualified as a $2.0 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2020 with a one-year extension option subjectcash flow hedge, to lender consent and a $1.0 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in May 2018. These credit facilities, whichthe extent effective, are for general corporate purposes and also support BHE's commercial paper program and provide for the issuance of letters of credit, have variable interest rates basedincluded on the Eurodollar rateConsolidated Statements of Changes in Equity as AOCI, net of tax, until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it has determined that a derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, or a base rate, at BHE's option, plus a spreadwhen it is no longer probable that varies based on BHE's credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the weighted average interest rate on commercial paper borrowings outstanding was 1.74% and 0.88%, respectively. These credit facilities require that BHE's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.70 to 1.0hedged forecasted transaction will occur. When hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, future changes in the estimated fair value of the last dayderivative contract are charged to earnings. Gains and losses related to discontinued hedges that were previously recorded in AOCI will remain in AOCI until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings, unless it becomes probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur at which time associated deferred amounts in AOCI are immediately recognized in earnings.

Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of each quarter.

As of December 31, 2017fuel, which includes coal stocks, stored gas and 2016, BHE had $96fuel oil, totaling $248 million and $123 million, respectively, of letters of credit outstanding, of which $7$296 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016 were issued under2021, respectively, and materials and supplies totaling $1,008 million and $826 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The cost of materials and supplies, coal stocks and fuel oil is determined primarily using the credit facilities.average cost method. The cost of stored gas is determined using either the last-in-first-out ("LIFO") method or the lower of average cost or market. With respect to inventories carried at LIFO cost, the replacement cost would be $22 million and $27 million higher as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. The Company capitalizes all construction-related materials, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include capitalized interest, including debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable to the Regulated Businesses. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has regulatory arrangements in Iowa in which the carrying cost of certain utility plant has been reduced for amounts associated with electric returns on equity exceeding specified thresholds.

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by the Company's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by the Regulated Businesses to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These lettersstudies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of creditthe assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

124


Generally when the Company retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, is capitalized by the Regulated Businesses as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") and the Alberta Utilities Commission ("AUC"). After construction is completed, the Company is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. The Company's AROs are primarily supportrelated to the decommissioning of nuclear generating facilities and obligations associated with its other generating facilities and offshore natural gas pipelines. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. For the Regulated Businesses, the difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.

Impairment

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a majority of all property, plant and equipment is used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

Leases

The Company has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office space, office equipment, generating facilities, land and rail cars and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities and vehicles. These leases generally require the Company to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. The Company does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating the Company is reasonably certain to exercise the option. The Company's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

The Company's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and debt service requirementscan yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

The Company's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

125


Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at certain subsidiariesleast annually and completed its annual review as of BHE Renewables, LLC expiring through December 2018October 31, 2022. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the estimated fair value, then the excess is charged to earnings as an impairment loss. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and have provisions that automatically extendperforming goodwill impairment tests. The determination of fair value incorporates significant unobservable inputs. During 2022, 2021 and 2020, the annual expiration datesCompany did not record any material goodwill impairments.

The Company records goodwill adjustments for an additional year unlesschanges to the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of creditpurchase price allocation prior to the expirationend of the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date.


Revenue Recognition

    Customer Revenue

The Company uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the event one of the parties to a contract has performed before the other, the Company would recognize a contract asset or contract liability depending on the relationship between the Company's performance and the customer's payment.

        Energy Products and Services

A majority of the Company's energy revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission, distribution and natural gas and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. The Company's energy revenue that is nonregulated primarily relates to the Company's renewable energy business.

Revenue recognized is equal to what the Company has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2017, BHE had2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $828 million and $718 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a $600 million term loan outstanding expiringliability for estimated refunds is accrued.

        Real Estate Services

The Company's HomeServices reportable segment consists of separate brokerage, mortgage and franchise businesses. Rates charged for brokerage, mortgage and franchise real estate services are established through contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price and the allocation of the price amongst the separate performance obligations.

The full-service residential real estate brokerage business has performance obligations to deliver integrated real estate services including brokerage services, title and closing services, property and casualty insurance, home warranties, relocation services, and other home-related services to customers. All performance obligations related to the full-service residential real estate brokerage business are satisfied in June 2018. less than one year at the point in time when a real estate transaction is closed or when services are provided. Commission revenue from real estate brokerage transactions and related amounts due to agents are recognized when a real estate transaction is closed. Title and escrow closing fee revenue from real estate transactions and related amounts due to the title insurer are recognized at closing. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer at closing.

126


The term loan hadfranchise business operates a network that has performance obligations to provide the right to use certain brand names and other related service marks as well as to provide orientation programs, training and consultation services, advertising programs and other services to its franchisees. The performance obligations related to the franchise business are satisfied over time or when the services are provided. Franchise royalty fees are sales-based variable interest rateconsideration and are based on a percentage of commissions earned by franchisees on real estate sales, which are recognized when the Eurodollar rate, plus a fixed spread, or a base rate, at BHE's option. In January 2018, BHE repaidsale closes. Meetings and training revenue, referral fees, late fees, service fees and franchise termination fees are earned when services have been completed. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the term loan at par plus accrued interest. Asfranchisee within 30 days of December 31, 2017,billing.

    Other Revenue

Energy Products and Services

Other revenue consists primarily of revenue related to power purchase agreements not considered Customer Revenue as they are recognized in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" and ASC 842, "Leases" and certain non-tariff-based revenue approved by the interest rateregulator that is not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers."

        Real Estate Service

Mortgage and other revenue consists primarily of revenue related to the mortgage business. Mortgage fee revenue consists of amounts earned related to application and underwriting fees and fees on canceled loans. Fees associated with the outstanding term loan was 2.27%.origination of mortgage loans are recognized as earned. These amounts are not considered Customer Revenue as they are recognized in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging," ASC 825, "Financial Instruments" and ASC 860, "Transfers and Servicing."


PacifiCorpUnamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Debt Issuance Costs


PacifiCorp has a $600 million unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2020 with two one-year extension options subject to lender consentPremiums, discounts and a $400 million unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2020 with a one-year extension option subject to lender consent. These credit facilities, which support PacifiCorp's commercial paper program, certain series of its tax-exempt bond obligations and providedebt issuance costs incurred for the issuance of letters of credit, have variable interest rates based on the Eurodollar rate or a base rate, at PacifiCorp's option, plus a spread that varies based on PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,are amortized over the weighted average interest rate on commercial paper borrowings outstanding was 1.83% and 0.96%, respectively. These credit facilities require that PacifiCorp's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 asterm of the last day of each quarter.related financing using the effective interest method.


As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, PacifiCorp had $230 million and $269 million, respectively, of fully available letters of credit issued under committed arrangements. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $216 million and $255 million, respectively, of these letters of credit support PacifiCorp's variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations and expire through March 2019 and $14 million support certain transactions required by third parties and have provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration dates for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

MidAmerican Funding

MidAmerican Energy has a $900 million unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2020 with two one-year extension options subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which supports MidAmerican Energy's commercial paper program and its variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Eurodollar rate or a base rate, at MidAmerican Energy's option, plus a spread that varies based on MidAmerican Energy's credit ratings for senior unsecured long-term debt securities.

As of December 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on commercial paper borrowings outstanding was 0.73%. The credit facility requires that MidAmerican Energy's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.


NV Energy

Nevada Power has a $400 million secured credit facility expiring in June 2020 and Sierra Pacific has a $250 million secured credit facility expiring in June 2020 each with two one-year extension options subject to lender consent. These credit facilities, which are for general corporate purposes and provide for the issuance of letters of credit, have a variable interest rate based on the Eurodollar rate or a base rate, at each of the Nevada Utilities' option, plus a spread that varies based on each of the Nevada Utilities' credit ratings for its senior secured long‑term debt securities. Amounts due under each credit facility are collateralized by each of the Nevada Utilities' general and refunding mortgage bonds. These credit facilities require that each of the Nevada Utilities' ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.

Northern Powergrid

Northern Powergrid has a £150 million unsecured credit facility expiring in April 2020. The credit facility has a variable interest rate based on sterling London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a spread that varies based on its credit ratings. The credit facility requires that the ratio of consolidated senior total net debt, including current maturities, to regulated asset value not exceed 0.8 to 1.0 at Northern Powergrid and 0.65 to 1.0 at Northern Powergrid (Northeast) Limited and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc as of June 30 and December 31. Northern Powergrid's interest coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.5 to 1.0.

AltaLink


ALPAltaLink is regulated by the AUC, pursuant to the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), the Public Utilities Act (Alberta), the Alberta Utilities Commission Act (Alberta) and the Hydro and Electric Energy Act (Alberta). The AUC is an independent, quasi-judicial agency established by the province of Alberta, Canada, which is responsible for, among other things, approving the tariffs of transmission facility owners, including AltaLink, and distribution utilities, acquisitions of such transmission facility owners or utilities, and construction and operation of new transmission projects in Alberta. The AUC also investigates and rules on regulated rate disputes and system access problems. The AUC regulates and oversees Alberta's electricity transmission sector with broad authority that may impact many of AltaLink's activities, including its tariffs, rates, construction, operations and financing.

48


The AUC has various core functions in regulating the Alberta electricity transmission sector, including the following:
regulating and adjudicating issues related to the operation of electric utilities within Alberta;
processing and approving general tariff applications relating to revenue requirements, capital expenditure prudency and rates of return including deemed capital structure for regulated utilities while ensuring that utility rates are just and reasonable, and approval of the transmission tariff rates of regulated transmission providers paid by the AESO, which is the independent transmission system operator in Alberta, Canada that controls the operation of AltaLink's transmission system;
approving the need for new electricity transmission facilities and permits to build and licenses to operate electricity transmission facilities;
reviewing operations and accounts from electric utilities and conducting on-site inspections to ensure compliance with industry regulation and standards;
adjudicating enforcement issues including the imposition of administrative penalties that arise when market participants violate the rules of the AESO; and
collecting, storing, analyzing, appraising and disseminating information to effectively fulfill its duties as an industry regulator.

In addition, AUC approval is required in connection with new energy and regulated utility initiatives in Alberta, amendments to existing approvals and financing proposals by designated utilities.

AltaLink's tariffs are regulated by the AUC under the provisions of the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) in respect of rates and terms and conditions of service. The Electric Utilities Act (Alberta) and related regulations require the AUC to consider that it is in the public interest to provide consumers the benefit of unconstrained transmission access to competitive generation and the wholesale electricity market. In regulating transmission tariffs, the AUC must facilitate sufficient investment to ensure the timely upgrade, enhancement or expansion of transmission facilities, and foster a stable investment climate and a continued stream of capital investment for the transmission system.

Under the Electric Utilities Act (Alberta), AltaLink prepares and files applications with the AUC for approval of tariffs to be paid by the AESO for the use of its transmission facilities, and the terms and conditions governing the use of those facilities. The AUC reviews and approves such tariff applications based on a cost-of-service regulatory model under a forward test year basis. Under this model, the AUC provides AltaLink with a reasonable opportunity to (i) earn a fair return on equity; and (ii) recover its forecast costs, including operating expenses, depreciation, borrowing costs and taxes (including deemed income taxes) associated with its regulated transmission business. The AUC must approve tariffs that are just, reasonable and not unduly preferential, arbitrary or unjustly discriminatory. AltaLink's transmission tariffs are not dependent on the price or volume of electricity transported through its transmission system.

The AESO is an independent system operator in Alberta, Canada that oversees the Alberta Interconnected Electric System ("AIES") and wholesale electricity market. The AESO is responsible for directing the safe, reliable and economic operation of the AIES, including long-term transmission system planning. AltaLink and the other transmission facility owners receive substantially all of their transmission tariff revenues from the AESO. The AESO, in turn, charges wholesale tariffs, approved by the AUC, in a manner that promotes fair and open access to the AIES and facilitates a competitive market for the purchase and sale of electricity. The AESO monitors compliance with approved reliability standards, which are enforced by the Market Surveillance Administrator, which may impose penalties on transmission facility owners for non-compliance with the approved reliability standards.

The AESO determines the need and plans for the expansion and enhancement of the transmission system in Alberta in accordance with applicable law and reliability standards. The AESO's responsibilities include long-term transmission planning and management, including assessing the current and future transmission system capacity needs of market participants. When the AESO determines an expansion or enhancement of the transmission system is needed, with limited exceptions, it submits an application to the AUC for approval of the proposed expansion or enhancement. The AESO then determines which transmission provider should submit an application to the AUC for a permit and license to construct and operate the designated transmission facilities. Generally, the transmission provider operating in the geographic area where the transmission facilities expansion or enhancement is to be located is selected by the AESO to build, own and operate the transmission facilities. In addition, Alberta law provides that certain transmission projects may be subject to a competitive process open to qualified bidders.

49


Independent Power Projects

The Yuma, Cordova, Saranac, Power Resources, Topaz, Agua Caliente, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Bishop Hill II, Jumbo Road, Marshall, Grande Prairie, Walnut Ridge, Pinyon Pines I, Pinyon Pines II, Santa Rita, Independence, Fluvanna II, Flat Top, Mariah del Norte, Alamo 6 and Pearl independent power projects are Exempt Wholesale Generators ("EWG") under the Energy Policy Act, while the Community Solar Gardens, Imperial Valley and Wailuku independent power projects are currently certified as Qualifying Facilities ("QF") under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978. Both EWGs and QFs generally are exempt from compliance with extensive federal and state regulations that control the financial structure of an electric generating plant and the prices and terms at which electricity may be sold by the facilities.

The Yuma, Cordova, Saranac, Imperial Valley, Topaz, Agua Caliente, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Bishop Hill II, Marshall, Grande Prairie, Walnut Ridge, Independence, Pinyon Pines I and Pinyon Pines II independent power projects have obtained authority from the FERC to sell their power at market-based rates. This authority to sell electricity in wholesale electricity markets at market-based rates is subject to triennial reviews conducted by the FERC. Accordingly, the respective independent power projects are required to submit triennial filings to the FERC that demonstrate a lack of market power over sales of wholesale electricity and electric generation capacity in their respective market areas. The Pinyon Pines I, Pinyon Pines II, Solar Star 1, Solar Star 2, Topaz and Yuma independent power projects and power marketers CalEnergy, LLC and BHER Market Operations, LLC file together for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Southwest Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Southwest Region was made in June 2022 and is awaiting FERC action. The Cordova and Saranac independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together with MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Northeast Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Northeast Region was made in June 2020 and an order accepting it was issued in December 2020. The Bishop Hill II and Walnut Ridge independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together with MidAmerican Energy and certain affiliates for market power study purposes of the FERC-defined Central Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Central Region was made in December 2020 and an order accepting it was issued in March 2021. The Marshall and Grande Prairie independent power projects and power marketer CalEnergy, LLC file together for market power study purposes in the FERC-defined Southwest Power Pool Region. The most recent triennial filing for the Southwest Power Pool Region was made in December 2021, was supplemented in July 2022 and an order accepting it was issued in January 2023. Power marketers CalEnergy LLC and BHER Market Operations, LLC also file for market power study purposes in the FERC-defined Northwest Region together with PacifiCorp, Nevada Power Company, Sierra Power Company and certain affiliates. The most recent triennial filing for the Northwest Region was made in June 2022, and is awaiting FERC action.

The entire output of Jumbo Road, Santa Rita, Fluvanna II, Flat Top, Mariah del Norte, Alamo 6, Pearl and Power Resources is within the ERCOT and market-based authority is not required for such sales solely within ERCOT as the ERCOT market is not a FERC-jurisdictional market. Similarly, Wailuku sells its output solely to the Hawaii Electric Light Company within the Hawaii electric grid, which is not a FERC-jurisdictional market and therefore, Wailuku does not require market-based rate authority.

EWGs are permitted to sell capacity and electricity only in the wholesale markets, not to end users. Additionally, utilities are required to purchase electricity produced by QFs at a price that does not exceed the purchasing utility's "avoided cost" and to sell back-up power to the QFs on a non-discriminatory basis, unless they have successfully petitioned the FERC for an exemption from this purchase requirement. Avoided cost is defined generally as the price at which the utility could purchase or produce the same amount of power from sources other than the QF on a long-term basis. The Energy Policy Act eliminated the purchase requirement for utilities with respect to new contracts under certain conditions. New QF contracts are also subject to FERC rate filing requirements, unlike QF contracts entered into prior to the Energy Policy Act. FERC regulations also permit QFs and utilities to negotiate agreements for utility purchases of power at rates other than the utility's avoided cost.

Residential Real Estate Brokerage Company

HomeServices and its operating subsidiaries are regulated by the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau which enforces the Truth In Lending Act ("TILA"), the Equal Credit Opportunity Act ("ECOA") and the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"); by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission with respect to certain franchising activities; by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, which enforces the Fair Housing Act ("FHA"); and by state agencies where its subsidiaries operate. TILA and ECOA regulate lending practices. FHA prohibits housing-related discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, familial status, and disability. RESPA regulates real estate settlement services including real estate closing practices, lender servicing and escrow account practices and business relationships among settlement service providers and third parties to the transaction.

50


REGULATORY MATTERS

In addition to the discussion contained herein regarding regulatory matters, refer to "General Regulation" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding the general regulatory framework.

PacifiCorp

Oregon

In July 2021, in accordance with the OPUC's December 2020 general rate case order, PacifiCorp filed an application with the OPUC to initiate the review of PacifiCorp's estimated decommissioning and other closure costs per third-party studies associated with its coal-fueled generating facilities. The application requested an initial rate increase of $35 million, or 2.8%, to become effective January 1, 2022, to recover the incremental costs from those approved in the last general rate case. In November 2023, an independent evaluator was selected. Until the independent evaluator completes its work reviewing the third party studies that contain the estimated decommissioning and other closure costs and the OPUC issues an order, there will be no change to rates related to this filing.

In March 2022, PacifiCorp filed a general rate case requesting an overall rate change of $82 million, or 6.6%, to become effective January 1, 2023, that includes cost increases associated with the implementation of PacifiCorp's wildfire mitigation and vegetation management plans. Parties to the case filed testimony in June 2022. PacifiCorp filed reply testimony in July 2022 supporting an overall rate increase of $94 million but proposing that the request be capped at PacifiCorp's original request. PacifiCorp and parties to the case settled various aspects of the general rate case in multiple settlement stipulations. In August 2022, the first partial stipulation was filed resolving issues related to wildfire mitigation and vegetation management, including addressing the associated costs increases. Also in August 2022, a second partial stipulation was filed representing the settlement of certain revenue requirement issues among the stipulating parties, including the extension of Oregon's recovery period for Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 that will be converted to natural gas-fueled units and certain other issues. In September 2022, a third stipulation was filed resolving most of the remaining issues in the general rate case following the first and second partial stipulations. The stipulations together result in a total rate increase of $49 million, or 3.9%, effective January 1, 2023. The stipulating parties also agreed to amortize certain deferrals totaling approximately $10 million, or 0.8 %, in the first year of amortization, effective April 1, 2023. Further, in the third stipulation, PacifiCorp agreed to a general rate case stay-out provision under which it agreed not to file a general rate case with rates effective any earlier than January 1, 2025. In September 2022, the fourth and final partial stipulation was filed resolving technical issues related to a voluntary renewable energy tariff that will allow non-residential customers to purchase energy from renewable resources not currently in PacifiCorp's rates. In December 2022, the OPUC approved the first, second and third stipulations. The fourth stipulation was approved by the OPUC in February 2023.

In May 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2021 PCAM, which is the first time since the mechanism has been in place that a rate change has been warranted. After consideration of the mechanism's deadband, sharing band and earnings test, PacifiCorp requested recovery of $52 million, or a 4.2% increase, to become effective January 1, 2023. This request is incremental to the rate change sought in the general rate case. In September 2022, a settlement stipulation was filed agreeing to the recovery of the requested $52 million over a four-year period beginning April 1, 2023. In December 2022, the OPUC approved the settlement stipulation.

In July 2022, PacifiCorp filed an application requesting approval of an automatic adjustment clause with a balancing account to recover costs associated with implementing PacifiCorp's wildfire protection plan in Oregon. Oregon Senate Bill 762 provides for utilities to timely recover these costs through an automatic adjustment clause. The filing requests a rate increase of $20 million, or 1.6%, to recover incremental costs in 2022 and is incremental to costs addressed in PacifiCorp's wildfire mitigation and vegetation management mechanism through the general rate case stipulation described above. While PacifiCorp requested an effective date of August 24, 2022, the OPUC has suspended the filing for further review. In December 2022, a stipulation with certain parties was filed agreeing to the establishment of an automatic adjustment clause. A decision on the stipulation is expected in 2023.

Washington

In June 2021, PacifiCorp filed a power cost only rate case to update baseline net power costs for 2022. PacifiCorp requested a $13 million, or 3.7%, rate increase with an effective date of January 1, 2022. In November 2021, PacifiCorp reached a proposed settlement with most of the parties, which includes an agreement to adjust the PTC rate in base rates and apply a production factor and include a net power cost update as part of the compliance filing. A hearing was held in January 2022 and the WUTC issued an order approving the settlement in March 2022. A compliance filing reflecting a $43 million, or 12.2%, increase was filed in April 2022 and was approved by the WUTC the same month with rates effective May 1, 2022.
51



In June 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2021 PCAM and the new tracking mechanism for PTCs approved in the 2021 general rate case. For the 2021 PCAM, PacifiCorp is requesting a recovery of $26 million, or a 6.5% increase. PacifiCorp proposed that the 2021 PCAM be amortized over two years, rather than the one-year period required under the current terms of the PCAM. For the new 2021 PTC tracker, PacifiCorp is seeking recovery of $3 million, or an 0.8% increase. In November 2022, the WUTC approved PacifiCorp's proposal resulting in a combined annual increase of $16 million, or 4.0%, effective January 1, 2023.

Idaho

In October 2022, PacifiCorp filed an application for authority to implement the residential rate modernization plan. The plan proposes a five-year transition to increase the monthly customer service charge from $8.00 to $29.25 per month with a corresponding reduction to the energy rate, eliminates the tiered rates, and adjusts the on-peak off-peak period for time-of-day customers.

California

In August 2021, PacifiCorp filed an application with the CPUC to address California energy costs and GHG allowance costs, and in January 2022, an amended application was filed, per CPUC direction, to reflect ECAC rates which had been approved since the original filing was made. The amended application included an over $3 million rate increase associated with higher energy costs, and the previously sought increase of $3 million to recover GHG allowances. In March 2022, the CPUC approved the increase of $3 million to recover costs for purchasing GHG allowances as required by the state's Cap-and-Trade program. In November 2022, the CPUC approved and made effective the over $3 million rate increase associated with higher energy costs, for a combined rate increase of $7 million, or 6.6%.

In May 2022, PacifiCorp filed a general rate case requesting an overall rate change of $28 million, or 25.7%, to become effective January 1, 2023. In November 2022, the CPUC granted the requested rate effective date and directed PacifiCorp to establish a memorandum account to track the change in rates beginning January 1, 2023 until the new rates become effective, upon the issuance of a decision in late 2023. PacifiCorp filed rebuttal testimony in February 2023 with a slight adjustment of an overall rate increase of $27 million, or 25.0%. Also in February 2023, the CPUC issued a ruling requesting additional information on PacifiCorp's wildfire and risk analyses, and requested additional information regarding wildfire memorandum accounts.

In August 2022, PacifiCorp filed its 2023 combined ECAC and GHG application requesting an overall rate increase of $15 million, or 13.6%, effective January 1, 2023. Approximately $4 million of the increase, or 3.6%, is attributed to the ECAC rate and $11 million of the increase, or 10.0%, to the GHG rate. In February 2023, PacifiCorp filed an amended application, per CPUC direction, to reflect ECAC rates which had been approved since the original filing was made in August 2022. The amended application would result in an overall rate increase of $11 million, or 10.1%. PacifiCorp anticipates interim approval of its GHG rates in March 2023 based on settlement discussions with parties.

FERC Show Cause Order

On April 15, 2021, the FERC issued an order to show cause and notice of proposed penalty related to allegations made by FERC Office of Enforcement staff that PacifiCorp failed to comply with certain NERC reliability standards associated with facility ratings on PacifiCorp's bulk electric system. The order directs PacifiCorp to show cause as to why it should not be assessed a civil penalty of $42 million as a result of the alleged violations. The allegations are related to PacifiCorp's response to a 2010 industry-wide effort directed by the NERC to identify and remediate certain discrepancies resulting from transmission facility design and actual field conditions, including transmission line clearances. In July 2021, PacifiCorp filed its answer to the FERC's show cause order denying the alleged violation of certain NERC reliability standards. The FERC Office of Enforcement staff replied in September 2021. In December 2022, the FERC issued a final order approving a stipulation and consent agreement between the FERC Office of Enforcement and PacifiCorp whereby PacifiCorp agreed to pay a $1.9 million cash penalty and committed to invest $2.5 million in reliability enhancements. The final order concludes the matter.

52


MidAmerican Energy

South Dakota

In May 2022, MidAmerican Energy filed a request with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission ("SDPUC") for an increase in its South Dakota retail natural gas rates, which would increase revenue by $7 million annually. If approved, the requested rates would increase retail customers' bills by an average of 6.4%.

Wind PRIME

In January 2022, MidAmerican Energy filed an application with the IUB for advance ratemaking principles for Wind PRIME. If approved, MidAmerican Energy expects to proceed with Wind PRIME, which consists of up to 2,042 MWs of new wind generation and up to 50 MWs of solar generation. If all of Wind PRIME generation is constructed, MidAmerican Energy will own over 9,300 MWs of wind generation and nearly 200 MWs of solar generation. Wind PRIME is projected to allow MidAmerican Energy to generate renewable energy greater than or equal to all of its Iowa retail customers' annual energy needs. MidAmerican Energy secured sufficient safe harbor equipment necessary to remain eligible for 100% PTCs under current tax law. Procedural hearings with the IUB began in February 2023.

Iowa Transmission Legislation

In June 2020, Iowa enacted legislation that grants incumbent electric transmission owners the right to construct, own and maintain electric transmission lines that have been approved for construction in a federally registered planning authority's transmission plan and that connect to the incumbent electric transmission owner's facility. Also known as the Right of First Refusal, the law ensures MidAmerican Energy, as an incumbent electric transmission owner, has the legal right to construct, own and maintain transmission lines that have been approved by the MISO (or another federally registered planning authority) in MidAmerican Energy's service territory. To exercise the legal right, MidAmerican Energy must notify the IUB within 90 days of any such approval for construction that it intends to construct, own and maintain the electric transmission line. The law still requires an incumbent electric transmission owner to obtain a state franchise from the IUB to construct, erect, maintain or operate an electric transmission line and, upon issuance of a franchise, the incumbent electric transmission owner must provide the IUB an estimate of the cost to construct the electric transmission line and, until the construction is complete, a quarterly report updating the estimated cost to construct the electric transmission line. Legal challenges have been brought against similar laws in other states, but courts that have ruled on such cases have upheld the states' laws. In October 2020, a lawsuit challenging the law was filed in Iowa by national transmission interests. The suit raised issues specific to Iowa law, and the State of Iowa defended the law in the suit. MidAmerican Energy intervened and defended the law as well. The Iowa district court dismissed the lawsuit in March 2021 for lack of standing, and the national transmission interests appealed. In June 2022, the Iowa Court of Appeals upheld the district court's decision, after which the national transmission interests asked the Iowa Supreme Court to reconsider. In November 2022, the Iowa Supreme Court granted the motion to reconsider and accepted the case on the briefs already submitted; it is expected that oral arguments will be held in spring 2023. No stay of the law has been granted, and the law remains in effect pending appeal.

53


NV Energy (Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific)

Senate Bill 448 ("SB 448")

SB 448 was signed into law on June 10, 2021. The legislation is intended to accelerate transmission development, renewable energy and storage, and accelerate transportation electrification within the state of Nevada. In September 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed an amendment to the 2021 Joint IRP for the approval of their Transmission Infrastructure for a Clean Energy Economy Plan that sets forth a plan for the construction of high-voltage transmission infrastructure, Greenlink North among others, that will be placed into service no later than December 31, 2028, and requires the IRP to include at least one scenario that uses sources of supply that will achieve certain reductions in carbon dioxide emissions. In September 2021, the Nevada Utilities filed an application for the approval of their Economic Recovery Transportation Electrification Plan to accelerate transportation electrification in the state of Nevada. The plan establishes requirements for the contents of the transportation electrification investment as well as requirements for review, cost recovery and monitoring. The plan covers an initial period beginning January 1, 2022 and ending on December 31, 2024. In November 2021, the PUCN issued an order granting the application and accepting the Economic Recovery Transportation Electrification Plan with some modifications. The PUCN opened rulemakings to address other regulations that resulted from SB 448. In February 2022, the PUCN adopted regulations regarding the Economic Development Electric Rate Rider Program to revise the discounted electric rates to ease the economic burden on small businesses who take advantage of the discounted rates under the tariff. In September 2022, the PUCN adopted regulations regarding resource planning, which incorporates a plan to accelerate transportation electrification into the distributed resources plan pursuant to SB 448.

Transportation Electrification Plan ("TEP")

In September 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed an amendment to the 2021 joint IRP for the approval of a Distributed Resource Plan amendment to implement the state's first TEP pursuant to Section 51 of SB 448 and approve proposed tariffs and schedules to implement the TEP. The 2022 TEP outlines programs, investments and incentives to accelerate transportation electrification across Nevada. The Nevada Utilities proposed a budget of $348 million, which represents the maximum cost over the depreciable life of the TEP's programs and assets, to deploy the TEP in 2023 through 2024. A hearing related to the application for approval of the TEP was held in February 2023.

ON Line Temporary Rider ("ONTR")

In October 2021, Sierra Pacific filed an application with the PUCN for approval of the ONTR with corresponding updates to its electric rate tariffs to authorize recovery of the One Nevada Transmission Line ("ON Line") regulatory asset being accumulated as a result of the ON Line cost reallocation as well as the related on-going reallocated revenue requirement. Sierra Pacific's application would have, if approved by the PUCN as filed, resulted in a one-time rate increase of $28 million to be collected over a nine-month period starting on April 1, 2022. In March 2022, the PUCN issued an order directing Sierra Pacific to recover $14 million of the ON Line regulatory asset as a one-time rate increase collectable over a nine-month period effective April 1, 2022, with the expected remaining balance at December 31, 2022 to be included in rate base in the 2022 regulatory rate review for inclusion in the rates set in that case. In December 2022, the PUCN issued an order in the general rate review proceeding allowing for recovery of the remaining regulatory asset balance and directed Sierra Pacific to establish a regulatory liability for any over-collection of revenues from the ONTR rate rider which shall accrue carry charges.

Merger Application

In March 2022, the Nevada Utilities filed a joint application with the PUCN for authorization to merge Sierra Pacific with and into Nevada Power, with Nevada Power being the surviving entity. If approved by the PUCN as filed, Nevada Power will have two distinct electric service territories in northern and southern Nevada each with their own rates and one natural gas service territory in the Reno and Sparks area. In October 2022, all parties to the proceedings relating to the joint application entered into a Stipulation to delay the procedural schedule. The Nevada Utilities made a supplemental filing on December 30, 2022. An order is expected in the first half of 2023.

54


Regulatory Rate Review

In June 2022, Sierra Pacific filed a regulatory rate review with the PUCN that requested an annual revenue increase of $88 million, or 9.7%. In addition, a filing was made to revise depreciation rates based on a study, the results of which are reflected in the proposed revenue requirement. In August 2022, Sierra Pacific filed an updated certification filing that updated the requested annual revenue increase to $77 million, or 8.5%. Parties to the docket filed testimony and supporting documentation in August and September 2022 while rebuttal testimony was filed in September and October 2022. Hearings in the cost of capital, revenue requirement, and rate design phases were held in September, October, and November 2022, respectively. In December 2022, the PUCN issued an order approving an increase in base rates of $58 million, effective January 1, 2023, reflecting a reduction in Sierra Pacific's requested rate of return, updated depreciation and amortization rates for its electric operations and updated time of use periods to reflect the changes in system costs due to the increased solar generation on the system.

BHE Pipeline Group

BHE GT&S

In September 2021, EGTS filed a general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective November 1, 2021. EGTS' previous general rate case was settled in 1998. EGTS proposed an annual cost-of-service of approximately $1.1 billion, and requested increases in various rates, including general system storage rates by 85% and general system transmission rates by 60%. In October 2021, the FERC issued an order that accepted the November 1, 2021 effective date for certain changes in rates, while suspending the other changes for five months following the proposed effective date, until April 1, 2022, subject to refund. In September 2022, a settlement agreement was filed with the FERC, resolving EGTS' general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services and providing for increased service rates and decreased depreciation rates. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, EGTS' rates result in an increase to annual firm transmission and storage revenues of approximately $160 million and a decrease in annual depreciation expense of approximately $30 million, compared to the rates in effect prior to April 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, EGTS' provision for rate refund for April 2022 through December 2022 totaled $90 million and was included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In November 2022, the FERC approved the settlement agreement.

In January 2020, pursuant to the terms of a previous settlement, Cove Point filed a general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective March 1, 2020. Cove Point proposed an annual cost-of-service of approximately $182 million. In February 2020, the FERC approved suspending the changes in rates for five months following the proposed effective date, until August 1, 2020, subject to refund. In November 2020, Cove Point reached an agreement in principle with the active participants in the general rate case proceeding. Under the terms of the agreement in principle, Cove Point's rates effective August 1, 2020 resulted in an increase to annual revenues of approximately $4 million and a decrease in annual depreciation expense of approximately $1 million, compared to the rates in effect prior to August 1, 2020. The interim settlement rates were implemented November 1, 2020, and Cove Point's provision for rate refunds for August 2020 through October 2020 totaled $7 million. The agreement in principle was reflected in a stipulation and agreement filed with the FERC in January 2021. In March 2021, the FERC approved the stipulation and agreement and the rate refunds to customers were processed in late April 2021.

Northern Natural Gas

In July 2022, Northern Natural Gas filed a general rate case that proposed an overall annual cost-of-service of $1.3 billion. This is an increase of $323 million above the cost of service filed in its 2019 rate case of $1.0 billion. Depreciation on increased rate base and an increase in depreciation and negative salvage rates account for $115 million of the $323 million increase in the filed cost of service. Northern Natural Gas has requested increases in various rates, including transportation and storage reservation rates. In January 2023, the FERC approved Northern Natural Gas filing to implement its interim rates effective January 1, 2023, subject to refund and the outcome of hearing procedures.

55


BHE Transmission

AltaLink

2022-2023 General Tariff Application

In April 2021, AltaLink filed its 2022-2023 GTA delivering on the last two years of its commitment to keep rates flat for customers at or below the 2018 level of C$904 million for the five-year period from 2019 to 2023. The two-year application achieves flat tariffs by continuing to transition to the AUC-approved salvage recovery method and continuing the use of the flow-through income tax method, with an overall year-over-year increase of approximately 2% in 2022 and 2023 revenue requirements. AltaLink's 2022-2023 GTA reflected its continued commitment to provide rate stability to customers by maintaining flat tariffs and providing additional tariff relief measures, including a proposed tariff refund of C$60 million of accumulated depreciation in each of 2022 and 2023. The application requested the approval of transmission tariffs of C$824 million and C$847 million for 2022 and 2023, respectively after proposed refunds. In September 2021, AltaLink provided responses to information requests from the AUC and filed an amended application to reflect certain adjustments and forecast updates.

In January 2022, the AUC issued its decision with respect to AltaLink's 2022-2023 GTA. The AUC did not approve AltaLink's proposed refund due to an anticipated improvement in general economic conditions in Alberta. In March 2022, AltaLink filed a review and variance application requesting the AUC to review and vary its decision to deny AltaLink's proposed C$120 million refund of accumulated depreciation surplus, given material changes in circumstances since the decision was issued in January 2022. In May 2022, the AUC issued a decision with respect to AltaLink's application to review and vary its proposed $120 million refund of accumulated depreciation surplus. The AUC did not agree that the Alberta economy had materially deteriorated and determined that the long-term costs outweigh the short-term benefits of the refund.

In July 2022, AltaLink submitted its second compliance filing application with total 2022 and 2023 revenue requirements at C$879 million and C$883 million, respectively. In August 2022, the AUC approved the revised revenue requirements as filed, allowing AltaLink to fully deliver on its flat-for-five commitment to customers.

Generic Cost of Capital Proceeding

In January 2022, the AUC initiated the 2023 generic cost of capital proceeding. The proceeding will be conducted in two stages. The first stage will determine the cost of capital parameters for 2023 and the second stage will consider returning to a formula-based approach to establish cost of capital adjustments, commencing in 2024. In March 2022, the AUC issued its decision with respect to the first stage of the 2023 GCOC proceeding by approving the extension of the 2022 return on equity of 8.5% and deemed equity ratio of 37% for 2023, recognizing lingering uncertainty and continued volatility of financial markets due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In June 2022, the AUC initiated the second stage to explore a formula-based approach to determine the return on equity for 2024 and future test periods.

BHE U.S. Transmission

A significant portion of ETT's revenues are based on interim rate changes that can be filed twice annually and are subject to review and possible true-up in the next filed base regulatory rate review scheduled for no later than February 1, 2025. In February 2023, the Public Utilities Commission of Texas ("PUCT") approved ETT's request to suspend a base regulatory rate review filing scheduled for February 2023. Results of a base regulatory rate review would be prospective except for any deemed disallowance by the PUCT of the transmission investment since the initial base regulatory rate review in 2007. In June 2018, the PUCT approved ETT's application to reduce its transmission revenue by $28 million to reflect the lower federal income tax rate due to 2017 Tax Reform with the amortization of excess accumulated deferred federal income taxes expected to be addressed in the next base rate case.

56


ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS

Each Registrant is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact each Registrant's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state, local and international agencies. Each Registrant believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many laws and regulations are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts.

The Company has cumulative investments in (i) owned wind, solar and geothermal generating facilities of $31.6 billion and (ii) wind tax equity investments of $5.8 billion and has retired 16 coal-fueled generation facilities. As a result, as of December 31 2022, the Company reduced its annual GHG emissions by more than 27% as compared to 2005 levels. The Company plans to continue investing in wind, solar and other low-carbon generation and storage in the future, including (i) $6.4 billion on the construction of renewable generating facilities and repowering certain existing wind-powered generating facilities through 2025 and (ii) $1.3 billion on the construction of electric battery and pumped hydro storage facilities through 2025, and to retire an additional 16 coal-fueled generation facilities between 2023 and 2030 in a reliable and cost-effective manner, thereby achieving a 50% reduction in GHG emissions from 2005 levels in 2030. Refer to "Liquidity and Capital Resources" of each respective Registrant in Item 7 of this Form 10-K for discussion of each Registrant's renewable generation-related capital expenditures.

On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the "2022 Act") was signed into law. The 2022 Act contains numerous provisions, including expanded tax credits for clean energy incentives and a 15% corporate alternative minimum income tax on "adjusted financial statement income". The provisions of the 2022 Act become effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2022. The Company currently does not expect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. However, the Company expects future guidance from the Treasury Department and will continue to evaluate the impact of the 2022 Act as more guidance becomes available.

Air Quality Regulations

The Clean Air Act, as well as state laws and regulations impacting air emissions, provides a framework for protecting and improving the nation's air quality and controlling sources of air emissions. These laws and regulations continue to be promulgated and implemented and will impact the operation of BHE's generating facilities and require them to reduce emissions at those facilities to comply with the requirements. In addition, the potential adoption of state or federal clean energy standards, which include low-carbon, non-carbon and renewable electricity generating resources, may also impact electricity generators and natural gas providers.

National Ambient Air Quality Standards

Under the authority of the Clean Air Act, the EPA sets minimum NAAQS for six principal pollutants, consisting of carbon monoxide, lead, NOx, particulate matter, ozone and SO2, considered harmful to public health and the environment. Areas that achieve the standards, as determined by ambient air quality monitoring, are characterized as being in attainment, while those that fail to meet the standards are designated as being nonattainment areas. Generally, sources of emissions in a nonattainment area that are determined to contribute to the nonattainment are required to reduce emissions. Currently, with the exceptions described in the following paragraphs, air quality monitoring data indicates that all counties where the relevant Registrant's major emission sources are located are in attainment of the current NAAQS.

57


On June 4, 2018, the EPA published final ozone designations for much of the U.S. Relevant to the Registrants, these designations include classifying Yuma County, Arizona; Clark County, Nevada; and the Northern Wasatch Front, Southern Wasatch Front and Duchesne and Uintah counties in Utah as nonattainment-marginal with the 2015 ozone standard. These areas were required to meet the 2015 standard three years from the August 3, 2018, effective date. All other areas relevant to the Registrants were designated attainment/unclassifiable with this same action. However, on January 29, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated several provisions of the 2018 implementing rules for the 2015 ozone standards for contravening the Clean Air Act. The EPA and environmental groups finalized a consent decree in January 2022 that sets deadlines for the agency to approve or disapprove the "good neighbor" provisions of interstate ozone plans of dozens of states. Relevant to the Registrants, the EPA must, by April 30, 2022, propose to approve or disapprove the interstate ozone SIPs of Alabama, Iowa, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, West Virginia and Wisconsin. On February 22, 2022, the EPA published a series of proposed decisions to disapprove the SIPs for interstate ozone transport of 19 states. Relevant to the Registrants, these states include Alabama, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, West Virginia and Wisconsin. The EPA also proposed to approve Iowa's SIP after re-analyzing the state's data. In addition, the EPA must approve or disapprove the interstate plans of Arizona, California, Nevada and Wyoming. On April 15, 2022 the EPA issued its final rule approving Iowa's SIP as meeting the good neighbor provisions for the 2015 ozone standard. On May 24, 2022 the EPA disapproved the Utah and Wyoming interstate ozone SIPs. On January 30, 2023, the EPA entered into a stipulated extension to the deadline for action on the Wyoming SIP, setting a new deadline of December 15, 2023. The EPA explained that the extra time is needed to fully consider updated air quality information and public comments. The EPA is also reevaluating SIPs for Tennessee and Arizona. On January 31, 2023, the EPA issued final disapproval of the 19 SIPs proposed in April 2022, setting the stage to include those states in the federal implementation plan described under the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule. Separately, on March 28, 2022, the EPA proposed determinations as to whether certain areas have achieved levels of ground-level ozone pollution that meet the 2008 and 2015 ozone NAAQS. Relevant to Registrants, the Southern Wasatch Front in Utah and Yuma, Arizona are proposed to have met the 2015 ozone standard; and the Cincinnati area of Ohio and Kentucky and the Northern Wasatch Front in Utah are proposed to have not met the 2015 ozone, will be reclassified as Moderate Non-Attainment, and will have until August 3, 2024 to meet the standard. Until the EPA takes final action on the proposal and the affected states submit any required SIPs, the relevant Registrants cannot determine the impacts of the proposed rule.

Cross-State Air Pollution Rule

The EPA promulgated an initial rule in March 2005 to reduce emissions of NOx and SO2, precursors of ozone and particulate matter, from down-wind sources in the eastern U.S. to reduce emissions by implementing a plan based on a market-based cap-and-trade system, emissions reductions, or both. After numerous appeals, the CSAPR was promulgated to address interstate transport of SO2 and NOx emissions in 27 Eastern and Midwestern states. In March 2022, the EPA released its Good Neighbor Rule, which contains proposed revisions to the CSAPR framework and is intended to address ozone transport for the 2015 ozone NAAQS. The rule focuses on reductions of NOx and covers 26 states. Relevant to the Registrants, four states are included in the cross-state program for the first time - California, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming. The EPA proposes to retain emissions allowance trading for generating facilities. Beginning in 2023, emissions budgets would be set at the level of reductions achievable through immediately available measures such as consistently operating existing emissions controls. Starting in 2026, emissions budgets would be set at levels achievable by the installation of SCR controls at certain generating facilities. The proposal also includes additional industries beyond the power sector for the first time, with a focus on the top NOx emitting stationary source categories. These include natural gas pipeline compressor stations, among others. These sources will not have access to trading and will instead be subject to rate-based limits that are assigned for each source category. The EPA accepted comments on the proposal through June 21, 2022. On February 1, 2023, the EPA released updated air transport modeling that indicates two states, Delaware and Wyoming, do not significantly contribute to downwind maintenance receptors; and that four states, Arizona, Iowa, Kansas and New Mexico, in fact do significantly contribute to downwind maintenance receptors. It is anticipated that the EPA will rely on this updated modeling in the final good neighbor rule, which it intends to finalize in March 2023. Additional notice and comment rulemaking, such as a supplemental rule, would be required to rescind Iowa's approved SIP and incorporate additional states into the program. Until the EPA takes final action consistent with this decree, impacts to the relevant Registrants cannot be determined.

Regional Haze

The EPA's Regional Haze Rule, finalized in 1999, requires states to develop and implement plans to improve visibility in designated federally protected areas ("Class I areas"). Some of PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities in Utah, Wyoming, Arizona and Colorado and certain of Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's fossil-fueled generating facilities are subject to the Clean Air Visibility Rules. In accordance with the federal requirements, states are required to submit SIPs that address emissions from sources subject to BART requirements and demonstrate progress towards achieving natural visibility requirements in Class I areas by 2064.

58


In June 2019, the state of Utah incorporated a BART alternative into its SIP for regional haze planning period one. The BART alternative makes the shutdown of PacifiCorp's Carbon generating facility enforceable under the SIP and removes the requirement to install SCR equipment on Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington Units 1 and 2. The EPA approved the SIP revision with the BART alternative in October 2020. The EPA's actions also withdrew a prior FIP that required installation of SCR equipment on Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington Units 1 and 2. On January 19, 2021, Heal Utah, National Parks Conservation Association, Sierra Club and Utah Physicians for a Healthy Environment filed a petition for review of the Utah Regional Haze SIP Alternative in the Tenth Circuit. PacifiCorp and the state of Utah moved to intervene in the litigation. After review of the rule by the Biden administration, the EPA determined it would defend the rule and briefing has been completed. A date for oral arguments has not been scheduled. The Utah Air Quality Board approved the Utah Division of Air Quality's SIP for the regional haze second planning period on June 6, 2022. The SIP sets mass-based NOx emissions limits and rate-based SO2 limits for PacifiCorp's Hunter and Huntington generating facilities to ensure reasonable visibility progress for the second planning period.

The state of Wyoming issued two regional haze SIPs requiring the installation of SO2, NOx and particulate matter controls on certain PacifiCorp coal-fueled generating facilities in Wyoming. The EPA approved the SO2 SIP in December 2012 and the EPA's approval was upheld on appeal by the Tenth Circuit in October 2014. The EPA's final action on the Wyoming SIP in 2014 approved the state's plan to have PacifiCorp install low-NOx burners at Naughton Units 1 and 2, SCR controls at Naughton Unit 3 by December 2014, SCR controls at Jim Bridger Units 1 through 4 between 2015 and 2022, and low-NOx burners at Dave Johnston Unit 4. The EPA disapproved a portion of the Wyoming SIP and issued a FIP for Dave Johnston Unit 3, where it required the installation of SCR controls by 2019 or, in lieu of installing SCR controls, a commitment to shut down Dave Johnston Unit 3 by 2027, its currently approved depreciable life. The EPA also disapproved a portion of the Wyoming SIP and issued a FIP for the Wyodak coal-fueled generating facility, requiring the installation of SCR controls by 2019. PacifiCorp filed an appeal of the EPA's final action on Wyodak in March 2014. The state of Wyoming and several environmental groups also filed an appeal of the EPA's final action. In September 2014, the Tenth Circuit issued a stay of the March 2019 compliance deadline for Wyodak, pending further action by the Tenth Circuit in the appeal. The abatement on litigation was lifted September 28, 2022, and opening briefs were submitted in October 2022. PacifiCorp objects to the EPA's FIP requiring SCR on the Wyodak Unit. That requirement in the agency's plan remains stayed by the court. PacifiCorp has also intervened on behalf of the EPA against claims that Naughton Units 1 and 2 should have been subject to a SCR requirement. Separately, on February 14, 2022, the First Judicial District Court for the State of Wyoming entered a consent decree reached between the state of Wyoming and PacifiCorp resolving claims of threatened violations of the Clean Air Act, the Wyoming Environmental Quality Act and the Wyoming Air Quality Standards and Regulations at the Jim Bridger facility. No penalties were imposed under the consent decree. Consistent with the terms and conditions of the consent decree, PacifiCorp must convert both units to natural gas and begin meeting emissions limits consistent with that conversion by January 1, 2024. The EPA and PacifiCorp executed an administrative order on consent June 9, 2022, covering compliance for Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 under the regional haze rule. The federal order contains the same emission and operating limits as the Wyoming consent decree and adds federal approval of the compliance pathway outlined in the state consent decree, including revision of the SIP to include conversion of Jim Bridger Units 1 and 2 to natural gas. The order includes a one-year deadline to complete the SIP revision. On December 30, 2022, the Wyoming Air Quality Division submitted the state-approved revised regional haze state implementation plan requiring natural gas conversion of Jim Bridger units 1 and 2 to the EPA for approval. The plan revision replaces a previous requirement for selective catalytic reduction at the units. The Wyoming Air Quality Division also issued an air permit for the natural gas conversion of Jim Bridger units 1 and 2 on December 28, 2022. The EPA is expected to conduct a separate federal public comment process on the plan. For the second round of regional haze planning, Wyoming determined that no controls will be necessary on any Wyoming resources to make reasonable progress.

The state of Colorado regional haze SIP requires SCR equipment at Craig Unit 2 and Hayden Units 1 and 2, in which PacifiCorp has ownership interests. Each of those regional haze compliance projects are in-service. In addition, in February 2015, the state of Colorado finalized an amendment to its regional haze SIP relating to Craig Unit 1, in which PacifiCorp has an ownership interest, to require the installation of SCR controls by 2021. In September 2016, the owners of Craig Units 1 and 2 reached an agreement with state and federal agencies and certain environmental groups that were parties to the previous settlement requiring SCR to retire Unit 1 by December 31, 2025, in lieu of SCR installation, or alternatively to remove the unit from coal-fueled service by August 31, 2021 with an option to convert the unit to natural gas by August 31, 2023, in lieu of SCR installation. The terms of the agreement were approved by the Colorado Air Quality Board in December 2016, incorporated into an amended Colorado regional haze SIP in 2017 and approved by the EPA in August 2018. PacifiCorp identified a December 31, 2025, retirement date for Craig Unit 1 in its 2017 and 2019 IRPs.

59


Nevada, Utah and Wyoming each submitted regional haze SIPs for the regional haze second planning period to the EPA in August 2022. The EPA has 18 months to approve or disapprove all or parts of the states' plans. On August 25, 2022, the EPA promulgated a finding of failure to submit a SIP for the regional haze second planning period for 15 states, including Iowa. The finding establishes a two-year deadline for the agency to promulgate FIPs to address the requirements, unless prior to promulgating a FIP, the state submits, and the agency approves, a SIP meeting the requirements. The finding says the agency intends to continue to work with states in developing approvable SIP submittals in a timely manner. The Iowa Department of Natural Resources continues to work with the EPA on development of its SIP. On February 13, 2023, Iowa issued a draft SIP and will accept comment on the draft plan through March 16, 2023. Iowa proposes to require operational improvements to existing control equipment at MidAmerican Energy Company's Louisa Generation Station and Walter Scott Jr. Energy Center - Unit 3. Iowa anticipates submitting a final plan to the EPA in spring 2023.

Climate Change

In December 2015, an international agreement was negotiated by 195 nations to create a universal framework for coordinated action on climate change in what is referred to as the Paris Agreement. The Paris Agreement reaffirms the goal of limiting global temperature increase well below 2 degrees Celsius, while urging efforts to limit the increase to 1.5 degrees Celsius and reaching a global peak of GHG emissions as soon as possible to achieve climate neutrality by mid-century; establishes commitments by all parties to make nationally determined contributions and pursue domestic measures aimed at achieving the commitments; commits all countries to submit emissions inventories and report regularly on their emissions and progress made in implementing and achieving their nationally determined commitments; and commits all countries to submit new commitments every five years, with the expectation that the commitments will get more aggressive. In the context of the Paris Agreement, the U.S. agreed to reduce GHG emissions 26% to 28% by 2025 from 2005 levels. After more than 55 countries representing more than 55% of global GHG emissions submitted their ratification documents, the Paris Agreement became effective November 4, 2016; however, the U.S. completed its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on November 4, 2020. President Biden accepted the terms of the climate agreement on January 20, 2021, and the U.S. completed its reentry February 19, 2021. New commitments to the Paris Agreement were announced in April 2021, with the U.S. pledging to cut its overall GHG emissions 50% to 52% from 2005 levels by 2030 and to reach 100% carbon pollution-free electricity by 2035. Increasingly, states are adopting legislation and regulations to reduce GHG emissions, and local governments and consumers are seeking increasing amounts of clean and renewable energy.

60


GHG Performance Standards

Affordable Clean Energy Rule

In June 2014, the EPA released proposed regulations to address GHG emissions from existing fossil-fueled generating facilities, referred to as the Clean Power Plan, under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The EPA's proposal calculated state-specific emission rate targets to be achieved based on the "best system of emission reduction." In August 2015, the final Clean Power Plan was released, which established the best system of emission reduction as including: (a) heat rate improvements; (b) increased utilization of existing combined-cycle natural gas-fueled generating facilities; and (c) increased deployment of new and incremental non-carbon generation placed in-service after 2012. The Clean Power Plan was stayed by the U.S. Supreme Court in February 2016 while litigation proceeded. On June 19, 2019, the EPA repealed the Clean Power Plan and issued the Affordable Clean Energy rule. In the Affordable Clean Energy rule, the EPA determined that the best system of emission reduction for existing coal-fueled generating facilities is limited to actions that can be taken at a point source facility, specifically heat rate improvements and identified a set of candidate technologies and measures that could improve heat rates. Measures taken to meet the standards of performance must be achieved at the source itself. The Affordable Clean Energy rule was challenged by environmental and health groups in the D.C. Circuit. On January 19, 2021, the D.C. Circuit vacated and remanded the Affordable Clean Energy rule to the EPA, finding that the rule "rested critically on a mistaken reading of the Clean Air Act" that limited the best system of emission reduction to actions taken at a facility. In October 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal of that decision. Arguments in the case were held February 28, 2022, and on June 30, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision regarding the scope of the EPA's authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the "generation shifting" approach in the Clean Power Plan exceeded the powers granted to the EPA by Congress, although the court did not address whether the EPA may only adopt measures applied at the individual source as it did in the Affordable Clean Energy rule. A key area where the EPA went astray was using the Clean Power Plan to give states the option to promulgate regulations that would encourage "generation shifting," or moving away from higher-polluting power sources like coal to lower-polluting sources like natural gas or renewables. The U.S. Supreme Court found that type of regulation, which would impact larger economic forces beyond the fence lines of individual generating facilities, is not permitted under Section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act. The U.S. Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit's vacatur of the Affordable Clean Energy rule and remanded the case for further proceedings. The ruling has no immediate impact on the Registrants, as there is no Section 111(d) rule currently in effect. The Biden administration plans to propose by March 2023 its own rule to replace the Clean Power Plan and Affordable Clean Energy rule.

New Source Performance Standards for Methane Emissions

In August 2020, the EPA finalized regulations to rescind standards for methane emissions from the oil and gas sector. The changes eliminate requirements to regulate methane emissions from the production, processing, transmission and storage of oil and gas. The rule was immediately challenged by environmental and tribal groups, as well as numerous states. In January 2021, the D.C. Circuit lifted an administrative stay and allowed the rule to take effect, finding that groups challenging the rule had not met the standard for a long-term stay. On June 30, 2021, President Biden signed into law a joint resolution of Congress, adopted under the Congressional Review Act, disapproving the August 2020 rule. The resolution reinstated the 2012 volatile organic compounds standards and the 2016 volatile organic compounds and methane standards for the oil and natural gas transmission and storage segments, as well as the methane standards for the production and processing segments of the oil and gas sector. On November 2, 2021, the EPA proposed rules that would reduce methane emissions from both new and existing sources in the oil and natural gas industry. The proposals would expand and strengthen emission reduction requirements for new, modified and reconstructed oil and natural gas sources and would require states to reduce methane emissions from existing sources nationwide. The EPA took comment on the proposed rules through January 31, 2022. The EPA issued a supplemental proposal in November 2022 to further strengthen emission reduction requirements and intends to finalize the rules by fall 2023. Until the rules are finalized, the relevant Registrants cannot determine the full impacts of the proposed rule.

61


Water Quality Standards

The Clean Water Act establishes the framework for maintaining and improving water quality in the U.S. through a program that regulates, among other things, discharges to and withdrawals from waterways. The Clean Water Act requires that cooling water intake structures reflect the "best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact" to aquatic organisms. After significant litigation, the EPA released a proposed rule under §316(b) of the Clean Water Act to regulate cooling water intakes at existing facilities. The final rule was released in May 2014 and became effective in October 2014. Under the final rule, existing facilities that withdraw at least 25% of their water exclusively for cooling purposes and have a design intake flow of greater than two million gallons per day are required to reduce fish impingement (i.e., when fish and other aquatic organisms are trapped against screens when water is drawn into a facility's cooling system) by choosing one of seven options. Facilities that withdraw at least 125 million gallons of water per day from waters of the U.S. must also conduct studies to help their permitting authority determine what site-specific controls, if any, would be required to reduce entrainment of aquatic organisms (i.e., when organisms are drawn into the facility). PacifiCorp's Dave Johnston generating facility and all of MidAmerican Energy's coal-fueled generating facilities, except Louisa, Ottumwa and Walter Scott, Jr. Unit 4, which have water cooling towers, withdraw more than 125 million gallons per day of water from waters of the U.S. for once-through cooling applications. PacifiCorp's Jim Bridger, Naughton, Gadsby, Hunter and Huntington generating facilities currently utilize closed cycle cooling towers but are designed to withdraw more than two million gallons of water per day. If PacifiCorp's or MidAmerican Energy's existing intake structures require modification, the costs are not anticipated to be significant to the consolidated financial statements. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are not impacted by the §316(b) final rule since they do not utilize once-through cooling water intake or discharge structures at any of their generating facilities.

In November 2015, the EPA published final effluent limitation guidelines and standards for the steam electric power generating sector which, among other things, regulate the discharge of bottom ash transport water, fly ash transport water, combustion residual leachate and non-chemical metal cleaning wastes. In November 2019, the EPA proposed updates to the 2015 rule, specifically addressing flue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash transport water. The rule took effect in December 2020. The final rule changes the technology-basis for treatment of flue gas desulfurization wastewater and bottom ash transport water, revises the voluntary incentives program for flue gas desulfurization wastewater, and adds subcategories for high-flow units, low utilization units, and those that will transition away from coal combustion by 2028. While most of the issues raised by this rule are already being addressed through the CCR rule and are not expected to impose significant additional requirements, the Dave Johnston generating facility is impacted by the rule's bottom ash handling requirements at Units 1 and 2. The generating facility submitted notice to the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality that it will either achieve a cessation of coal combustion at Units 1 and 2 by December 31, 2028, or install bottom ash transport treatment technology by December 31, 2025. The EPA anticipates proposing additional changes to the rule in spring 2023 to resolve outstanding issues from litigation.

In April 2014, the EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps of Engineers") issued a joint proposal to address "waters of the United States" to clarify protection under the Clean Water Act for streams and wetlands. The proposed rule comes as a result of U.S. Supreme Court decisions in 2001 and 2006 that created confusion regarding jurisdictional waters that were subject to permitting under either nationwide or individual permitting requirements. The final rule was released in May 2015 but was appealed in multiple courts and a nationwide stay on the implementation of the rule was issued in October 2015. On June 9, 2021, the EPA and the Corps of Engineers announced their intention to again revise the definition of "waters of the United States." In December 2022, the agencies released a final rule updating the definition of "waters of the United States." The final rule generally restores and is broader than the pre-2015 "waters of the United States" definition and incorporates both the "relatively permanent" and "significant nexus" standards from U.S. Supreme Court decisions.

Coal Ash Disposal

In April 2015, the EPA released a final rule to regulate the management and disposal of coal combustion residuals (CCR) under the RCRA. The rule regulates coal combustion byproducts as non-hazardous waste under RCRA Subtitle D and establishes minimum nationwide standards for the disposal of CCR. Under the final rule, surface impoundments and landfills utilized for coal combustion byproducts will need to be closed unless they can meet the more stringent regulatory requirements.

62


At the time the rule was published in April 2015, PacifiCorp operated 18 surface impoundments and seven landfills that contained coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, nine surface impoundments and three landfills were either closed or repurposed to no longer receive coal combustion byproducts and hence are not subject to the final rule. As PacifiCorp proceeded to implement the final coal combustion rule, it was determined that two surface impoundments located at the Dave Johnston generating facility were hydraulically connected and effectively constitute a single impoundment. In November 2017, a new surface impoundment was placed into service at the Naughton Generating Station. At the time the rule was published in April 2015, MidAmerican Energy owned or operated nine surface impoundments and four landfills that contain coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, MidAmerican Energy closed or repurposed six surface impoundments to no longer receive coal combustion byproducts. Five of these surface impoundments were closed on or before December 21, 2017, and the sixth is undergoing closure. At the time the rule was published in April 2015, the Nevada Utilities operated 10 evaporative surface impoundments and two landfills that contained coal combustion byproducts. Prior to the effective date of the rule in October 2015, the Nevada Utilities closed four of the surface impoundments, four impoundments discontinued receipt of coal combustion byproducts making them inactive and two surface impoundments remain active and subject to the final rule. The two landfills remain active and subject to the final rule.

Multiple parties filed challenges over various aspects of the final rule in the D.C. Circuit, resulting in settlement of some of the issues and subsequent regulatory action by the EPA. The EPA finalized the first phase of the CCR rule amendments in July 2018 (the "Phase 1, Part 1 rule"). In addition to adopting alternative performance standards and revising groundwater performance standards for certain constituents, the EPA extended the deadline by which facilities must initiate closure of unlined ash ponds exceeding a groundwater protection standard and impoundments that do not meet the rule's aquifer location restrictions to October 31, 2020. Following submittal of competing motions from environmental groups and the EPA to stay or remand this deadline extension, on March 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit granted the EPA's request to remand the rule and left the October 31, 2020 deadline in place while the agency undertakes a new rulemaking establishing a new deadline for initiating closure. On August 14, 2019, the EPA released its "Phase 2" proposal, which contains targeted amendments to the CCR rule in response to court remands and EPA settlement agreements, as well as issues raised in a rulemaking petition. The Phase 2 rule has not been finalized. In February 2020, the EPA proposed a federal CCR permit program as required by the WIIN Act of 2016. The federal permit rule has not been finalized. In October 2020, the EPA released an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking on legacy CCR surface impoundments, seeking comment on and information related to issues relevant to development of regulations for legacy impoundments. The EPA has not undertaken additional rulemaking related to the advanced notice. Until the proposals are finalized and fully litigated, the Registrants cannot determine whether additional action may be required.

In August 2020, the EPA finalized its Holistic Approach to Closure: Part A rule ("Part A rule"). This proposal addressed the D.C. Circuit's revocation of the provisions that allow unlined impoundments to continue receiving ash. The Part A rule established a new deadline of April 11, 2021, by which all unlined surface impoundments must initiate closure. The Part A rule also identifies two extensions to that date: (1) a site-specific extension to develop alternate disposal capacity and initiate closure by October 15, 2023; and (2) a site-specific extension for facilities that agree to shut down the coal-fueled unit and complete ash pond closure activities by October 17, 2028. PacifiCorp developed a demonstration for the development of alternative capacity for the Jim Bridger facility's FGD Pond 2 and a demonstration for closure of the Naughton facility and ash pond and submitted them to the EPA in November 2020. On January 11, 2022, the EPA deemed these submittals complete but has not taken additional action on them. No other Registrants used the provisions of the Part A rule.

Notwithstanding the status of the final CCR rule, citizens' suits have been filed against regulated entities seeking judicial relief for contamination alleged to have been caused by releases of coal combustion byproducts. Some of these cases have been successful in imposing liability upon companies if coal combustion byproducts contaminate groundwater that is ultimately released or connected to surface water. In addition, actions have been filed against regulated entities seeking to require that surface impoundments containing CCR be subject to closure by removal rather than being allowed to effectuate closure in place as provided under the final rule. The Registrants are not a party to these lawsuits and until they are resolved, the Registrants cannot predict the impact on overall compliance obligations.

63


Other

Other laws, regulations and agencies to which the relevant Registrants are subject include, but are not limited to:
The federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act and similar state laws may require any current or former owners or operators of a disposal site, as well as transporters or generators of hazardous substances sent to such disposal site, to share in environmental remediation costs. Certain Registrants have been identified as potentially responsible parties in connection with certain disposal sites. The relevant Registrants have completed several cleanup actions and are participating in ongoing investigations and remedial actions. Costs associated with these actions are not expected to be material and are expected to be found prudent and included in rates.
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, under which the DOE is responsible for the selection and development of repositories for, and the permanent disposal of, spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive wastes. Refer to Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 11 of the Notes to Financial Statements of MidAmerican Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding MidAmerican Energy's nuclear decommissioning obligations.
The federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and similar state statutes establish operational, reclamation and closure standards that must be met during and upon completion of PacifiCorp's mining activities.
The FERC evaluates hydroelectric systems to ensure environmental impacts are minimized, including the issuance of environmental impact statements for licensed projects both initially and upon relicensing. The FERC monitors the hydroelectric facilities for compliance with the license terms and conditions, which include environmental provisions. Refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information regarding PacifiCorp's Klamath River hydroelectric system.

The Registrants expect they will be allowed to recover their respective prudently incurred costs to comply with the environmental laws and regulations discussed above. The Registrants' planning efforts take into consideration the complexity of balancing factors such as: (a) pending environmental regulations and requirements to reduce emissions, address waste disposal, ensure water quality and protect wildlife; (b) avoidance of excessive reliance on any one generation technology; (c) costs and trade-offs of various resource options including energy efficiency, demand response programs and renewable generation; (d) state-specific energy policies, resource preferences and economic development efforts; (e) additional transmission investment to reduce power costs and increase efficiency and reliability of the integrated transmission system; and (f) keeping rates affordable. Due to the number of generating units impacted by environmental regulations, deferring installation of compliance-related projects is often not feasible or cost effective and places the Registrants at risk of not having access to necessary capital, material, and labor while attempting to perform major equipment installations in a compressed timeframe concurrent with other utilities across the country. Therefore, the Registrants have established installation schedules with permitting agencies that coordinate compliance timeframes with construction and tie-in of major environmental compliance projects as units are scheduled off-line for planned maintenance outages; these coordinated efforts help reduce costs associated with replacement power and maintain system reliability.

Item 1A.    Risk Factors

Each Registrant is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, those described below. Careful consideration of these risks, together with all of the other information included in this Form 10-K and the other public information filed by the relevant Registrant, should be made before making an investment decision. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known or which each Registrant currently deems immaterial may also impair its business operations. Unless stated otherwise, the risks described below generally relate to each Registrant.

64


Corporate and Financial Structure Risks

BHE is a holding company and depends on distributions from subsidiaries, including joint ventures, to meet its obligations.

BHE is a holding company with no material assets other than the ownership interests in its subsidiaries and joint ventures, collectively referred to as its subsidiaries. Accordingly, cash flows and the ability to meet BHE's obligations are largely dependent upon the earnings of its subsidiaries and the payment of such earnings to BHE in the form of dividends or other distributions. BHE's subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and have no obligation, contingent or otherwise, to pay amounts due pursuant to BHE's senior debt, junior subordinated debt or its other obligations, or to make funds available, whether by dividends or other payments, for the payment of amounts due pursuant to BHE's senior debt, junior subordinated debt or its other obligations, and do not guarantee the payment of any of its obligations. Distributions from subsidiaries may also be limited by:
their respective earnings, capital requirements, and required debt and preferred stock payments;
the satisfaction of certain terms contained in financing, ring-fencing or organizational documents; and
regulatory restrictions that limit the ability of BHE's regulated utility subsidiaries to distribute profits.

BHE is substantially leveraged, the terms of its existing senior and junior subordinated debt do not restrict the incurrence of additional debt by BHE or its subsidiaries, and BHE's senior debt is structurally subordinated to the debt of its subsidiaries, and each of such factors could adversely affect BHE's consolidated financial results.

A significant portion of BHE's capital structure is comprised of debt, and BHE expects to incur additional debt in the future to fund items such as, among others, acquisitions, capital investments and the development and construction of new or expanded facilities. As of December 31, 2022, BHE had the following outstanding obligations:
senior unsecured debt of $14.0 billion;
junior subordinated debentures of $100 million;
guarantees and letters of credit in respect of subsidiaries, equity method investments and other related parties aggregating $1.6 billion; and

BHE's consolidated subsidiaries also have significant amounts of outstanding debt, which totaled $38.4 billion as of December 31, 2022. These amounts exclude (a) trade debt, (b) preferred stock obligations, (c) letters of credit in respect of subsidiary debt, and (d) BHE's share of the outstanding debt of its own or its subsidiaries' equity method investments.

Given BHE's substantial leverage, it may not have sufficient cash to service its debt, which could limit its ability to finance future acquisitions, develop and construct additional projects, or operate successfully under difficult conditions, including those brought on by adverse national and global economies, unfavorable financial markets or growth conditions where its capital needs may exceed its ability to fund them. BHE's leverage could also impair its credit quality or the credit quality of its subsidiaries, making it more difficult to finance operations or issue future debt on favorable terms, and could result in a downgrade in debt ratings by credit rating agencies.

The terms of BHE's and its subsidiaries' debt do not limit BHE's ability or the ability of its subsidiaries to incur additional debt or issue preferred stock. Accordingly, BHE or its subsidiaries could enter into acquisitions, new financings, refinancings, recapitalizations, leases or other highly leveraged transactions that could significantly increase BHE's or its subsidiaries' total amount of outstanding debt. The interest payments needed to service this increased level of debt could adversely affect BHE's or its subsidiaries' financial results. Many of BHE's subsidiaries' debt agreements contain covenants, or may in the future contain covenants, that restrict or limit, among other things, such subsidiaries' ability to create liens, sell assets, make certain distributions, incur additional debt or miss contractual deadlines or requirements, and BHE's ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond its control. Further, if an event of default accelerates a repayment obligation and such acceleration results in an event of default under some or all of BHE's other debt, BHE may not have sufficient funds to repay all of the accelerated debt simultaneously, and the other risks described under "Corporate and Financial Structure Risks" may be magnified as well.

65


Because BHE is a holding company, the claims of its senior debt holders are structurally subordinated with respect to the assets and earnings of its subsidiaries. Therefore, the rights of its creditors to participate in the assets of any subsidiary in the event of a liquidation or reorganization are subject to the prior claims of the subsidiary's creditors and preferred shareholders, if any. In addition, pursuant to separate financing agreements, substantially all of PacifiCorp's electric utility properties, MidAmerican Energy's electric utility properties in the state of Iowa, Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's properties in the state of Nevada, AltaLink's transmission properties, the equity interest of MidAmerican Funding's subsidiary and substantially all of the assets of the subsidiaries of BHE Renewables that are direct or indirect owners of solar and wind generation projects, are directly or indirectly pledged to secure their financings and, therefore, may be unavailable as potential sources of repayment of BHE's debt.

A downgrade in BHE's credit ratings or the credit ratings of its subsidiaries, including the Subsidiary Registrants, could negatively affect BHE's or its subsidiaries' access to capital, increase the cost of borrowing or raise energy transaction credit support requirements.

BHE's senior unsecured debt and its subsidiaries' long-term debt, including the Subsidiary Registrants, are rated by various rating agencies. BHE cannot give assurance that its senior unsecured debt rating or any of its subsidiaries' long-term debt ratings will not be reduced in the future. Although none of the Registrants' outstanding debt has rating-downgrade triggers that would accelerate a repayment obligation, a credit rating downgrade would increase any such Registrant's borrowing costs and commitment fees on its revolving credit agreements and other financing arrangements, perhaps significantly. In addition, such Registrant would likely be required to pay a higher interest rate in future financings, and the potential pool of investors and funding sources would likely decrease. Further, access to the commercial paper market could be significantly limited, resulting in higher interest costs.

Similarly, any downgrade or other event negatively affecting the credit ratings of BHE's subsidiaries could make their costs of borrowing higher or access to funding sources more limited, which in turn could cause BHE to provide liquidity in the form of capital contributions or loans to such subsidiaries, thus reducing its and its subsidiaries' liquidity and borrowing capacity.

Most of the Registrants' large wholesale customers, suppliers and counterparties require such Registrant to have sufficient creditworthiness in order to enter into transactions, particularly in the wholesale energy markets. If the credit ratings of a Registrant were to decline, especially below investment grade, the relevant Registrant's financing costs and borrowings would likely increase because certain counterparties may require collateral in the form of cash, a letter of credit or some other form of security for existing transactions and as a condition to entering into future transactions with such Registrant. Amounts could be material and could adversely affect such Registrant's liquidity and cash flows.

BHE's majority shareholder, Berkshire Hathaway, could exercise control over BHE in a manner that would benefit Berkshire Hathaway to the detriment of BHE's creditors and BHE could exercise control over the Subsidiary Registrants in a manner that would benefit BHE to the detriment of the Subsidiary Registrants' creditors and PacifiCorp'spreferred stockholders.

Berkshire Hathaway is majority owner of BHE and has control over all decisions requiring shareholder approval. In circumstances involving a conflict of interest between Berkshire Hathaway and BHE's creditors, Berkshire Hathaway could exercise its control in a manner that would benefit Berkshire Hathaway to the detriment of BHE's creditors.

BHE indirectly owns all of the common stock of PacifiCorp, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific and EGTS and the membership interest in Eastern Energy Gas. BHE is also the sole member of MidAmerican Funding and, accordingly, indirectly owns all of MidAmerican Energy's common stock. As a result, BHE has control over all decisions requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors. In circumstances involving a conflict of interest between BHE and the creditors of the Subsidiary Registrants, BHE could exercise its control in a manner that would benefit BHE to the detriment of the Subsidiary Registrants' creditors.

Business Risks

Much of BHE's growth has been achieved through acquisitions, and any such acquisition may not be successful.

Much of BHE's growth has been achieved through acquisitions. Future acquisitions may range from buying individual assets to the purchase of entire businesses. BHE will continue to investigate and pursue opportunities for future acquisitions that it believes, but cannot assure, may increase value and expand or complement existing businesses. BHE may participate in bidding or other negotiations at any time for such acquisition opportunities which may or may not be successful.

66


An acquisition could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, the activities of one or more of BHE's subsidiaries. In addition, the final orders of regulatory authorities approving acquisitions may be subject to appeal by third parties. The diversion of BHE management's attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the approval and integration of the acquired operations could adversely affect BHE's combined businesses and financial results and could impair its ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition.

BHE cannot assure that future acquisitions, if any, or any integration efforts will be successful, or that BHE's ability to repay its obligations will not be adversely affected by any future acquisitions.

The Registrants are subject to operating uncertainties and events beyond each respective Registrant's control that impact the costs to operate, maintain, repair and replace utility and interstate natural gas pipeline systems and the ability to self-insure many risks, which could adversely affect each respective Registrant's financial results.

The operation of complex utility systems or interstate natural gas pipeline and storage systems that are spread over large geographic areas involves many operating uncertainties and events beyond each respective Registrant's control. These potential events include the breakdown or failure of the Registrants' thermal, nuclear, hydroelectric, solar, wind and other electricity generating facilities and related equipment, compressors, pipelines, transmission and distribution lines and associated electric operations equipment or other equipment or processes, which could lead to catastrophic events; unscheduled outages; strikes, lockouts, other labor-related actions or shortages of qualified labor, including with respect to the Registrants' suppliers and vendors; transmission and distribution system constraints; failure to obtain, renew or maintain rights-of-way, easements and leases on U.S. federal, Native American, First Nations or tribal lands; terrorist activities or military or other actions, including cyber attacks; fuel shortages or interruptions; unavailability of critical equipment, materials and supplies; low water flows and other weather-related impacts; performance below expected levels of output, capacity or efficiency; operator error; third-party excavation errors; unexpected degradation of pipeline systems; design, construction or manufacturing defects; and catastrophic events such as severe storms, floods, fires, extreme temperature events, wind events, earthquakes, explosions, landslides, an electromagnetic pulse, mining incidents, costly litigation, wars, terrorism, pandemics and embargoes. A catastrophic event might result in injury or loss of life, extensive property damage, environmental or natural resource damages or excessive economic loss. For example, in the event of an uncontrolled release of water at one of PacifiCorp's high hazard potential hydroelectric dams, it is probable that loss of human life, disruption of lifeline facilities and property damage could occur in the downstream population and civil or other penalties could be imposed by the FERC. The extent of that liability would be determined by the applicable state law where any such damage occurred. Any of these events or other operational events could significantly reduce or eliminate the relevant Registrant's revenue or significantly increase its expenses, thereby reducing the availability of distributions to BHE. For example, if the relevant Registrant cannot operate its electricity or natural gas facilities at full capacity due to damage caused by a catastrophic event, its revenue could decrease and its expenses could increase due to the need to obtain energy from more expensive sources.

Further, the Registrants self-insure many risks, and current and future insurance coverage may not be sufficient to replace lost revenue or cover repair and replacement costs or other damages. The scope, cost and availability of each Registrant's insurance coverage may change, including the portion that is self-insured.

Any reduction of each Registrant's revenue or increase in its expenses resulting from the risks described above, could adversely affect the relevant Registrant's financial results.

The Registrants are subject to increasing risks from catastrophic wildfires and may be unable to obtain enough insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or at all and insurance coverage on existing wildfire claims could be insufficient to cover all losses should current estimates of those losses materially differ from the ultimate outcomes of the claims, all of which could materially affect the Registrants financial results and liquidity.

The risk of catastrophic and severe wildfires has increased in the western U.S. giving rise to the potential for large damage claims against utilities for fire-related losses. Catastrophic and severe wildfires can occur in PacifiCorp, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific's ("Western Domestic Utilities") service territories even when the Western Domestic Utilities effectively implement their wildfire mitigation plans and prudently manage their systems.

67


In California, for example, where PacifiCorp operates, "inverse condemnation" currently exposes utilities to potential liability for property damages where the utility's electrical equipment was a substantial cause of the wildfire. California courts have held that utilities can be held liable under inverse condemnation without being found negligent and regardless of fault. California law also permits inverse condemnation plaintiffs to recover attorney's fees. As a result of inverse condemnation being applied to utilities and wildfire damages, recent losses recorded by insurance companies, and the risk of an increase in the frequency, duration and size of wildfires, insurance for wildfire liabilities may not be available or may be available only at rates that are prohibitively expensive. In addition, even if insurance for wildfire liabilities is available, it may not be available in amounts necessary to cover potential losses. Uninsured losses and increases in the cost of insurance may be challenged when PacifiCorp seeks cost recovery and may not be recoverable in customer rates.

The Western Domestic Utilities monitor weather conditions with specific thresholds for designated high fire consequence areas to help ensure the safe and reliable operation of their systems during periods of elevated wildfire ignition risk. Should weather conditions become extreme, the Western Domestic Utilities may de-energize certain sections of their transmission and distribution facilities as a last resort to minimize risk to the public. These "public safety power shutoffs" could be subject to increased scrutiny by regulators and policy makers. And, although "public safety power shutoffs" are intended to minimize risk of wildfire ignition, de-energization may cause other damages for which the Western Domestic Utilities could be held liable.

Damage claims against PacifiCorp for wildfires may materially affect its financial condition and results of operations.

In September 2020, a severe weather event resulting in high winds, low humidity and warm temperatures contributed to several major wildfires, private and public property damages, personal injuries and loss of life and widespread power outages in Oregon and Northern California (the "2020 Wildfires"). Additionally, a major wildfire began in PacifiCorp's service territory in July 2022 causing private and public property damage, personal injuries, loss of life and power outages in Northern California (the "2022 McKinney Fire"). The wildfires spread across certain parts of PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas across multiple counties in Oregon and California. Investigations into the cause and origin of each wildfire are complex and ongoing. Several lawsuits and complaints have been filed in Oregon and California associated with the wildfires, and it is possible that additional lawsuits and complaints against PacifiCorp may be filed. If PacifiCorp is found liable for damages related to the 2020 Wildfires or the 2022 McKinney Fire and is unable to, or believes that it will be unable to, recover those damages through insurance or customer rates, or access the bank and capital markets on reasonable terms, PacifiCorp's financial results could be adversely affected. Refer to Item 3. Legal Proceedings, BHE's Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and PacifiCorp's Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire.

Each Registrant's business could be adversely affected by epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks.

Each Registrant's business could be adversely affected by epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks generally and more specifically in the markets in which we operate, including, without limitation, if each Registrant's utility customers experience decreases in demand for their products and services or otherwise reduce their consumption of electricity or natural gas that the respective Registrant supplies, or if such Registrant experiences material payment defaults by its customers. In addition, each Registrant's results and financial condition may be adversely affected by federal, state or local and foreign legislation related to such epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks (or other similar laws, regulations, orders or other governmental or regulatory actions) that would impose a moratorium on terminating electric or natural gas utility services, including related assessment of late fees, due to non-payment or other circumstances. Additionally, HomeServices' real estate businesses could experience a decline (which could be significant) in real estate transactions if potential customers elect to defer purchases in reaction to any epidemic, pandemic or other outbreak or due to general economic uncertainty such as high unemployment levels, in some or all of the real estate markets in which HomeServices operates. The government and regulators could impose other requirements on each Registrant's business that could have an adverse impact on such Registrant's financial results.

Further, epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks could disrupt supply chains (including supply chains for energy generation, steel or transmission wire) relating to the markets each Registrant serves, which could adversely impact such Registrant's ability to generate or supply power. In addition, such disruptions to the supply chain could delay certain construction and other capital expenditure projects, including construction and repowering of the Registrants' renewable generation projects. Such disruptions could adversely affect the impacted Registrant's future financial results.

Such declines in demand, any inability to generate or supply power or delays in capital projects could also significantly reduce cash flows at BHE's subsidiaries, thereby reducing the availability of distributions to BHE, which could adversely affect its financial results.

68


Each Registrant is subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign legislation and regulation, including numerous environmental, health, safety, reliability, data privacy and other laws and regulations that affect its operations and costs. These laws and regulations are complex, dynamic and subject to new interpretations or change. In addition, new laws and regulations, including initiatives regarding deregulation and restructuring of the utility industry, are continually being proposed and enacted that impose new or revised requirements or standards on each Registrant.

Each Registrant is required to comply with numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations as described in "General Regulation" and "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K that have broad application to each Registrant and limits the respective Registrant's ability to independently make and implement management decisions regarding, among other items, acquiring businesses; constructing, acquiring, disposing or retiring operating assets; operating and maintaining generating facilities and transmission and distribution system assets; complying with pipeline safety and integrity and environmental requirements; setting rates charged to customers; establishing capital structures and issuing debt or equity securities; managing and reporting transactions between subsidiaries and affiliates; and paying dividends or similar distributions. These laws and regulations, which are followed in developing the Registrants' safety and compliance programs and procedures, are implemented and enforced by federal, state and local regulatory agencies, such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the FERC, the EPA, the DOT, the NRC, the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration and various state regulatory commissions in the U.S., and by foreign regulatory agencies, such as GEMA, which discharges certain of its powers through its staff within Ofgem, in Great Britain and the AUC in Alberta, Canada.

Compliance with applicable laws and regulations generally requires each Registrant to obtain and comply with a wide variety of licenses, permits, inspections, audits and other approvals. Further, compliance with laws and regulations can require significant capital and operating expenditures, including expenditures for new equipment, inspection, cleanup costs, removal and remediation costs and damages arising out of contaminated properties. Compliance activities pursuant to existing or new laws and regulations could be prohibitively expensive or otherwise uneconomical. As a result, each Registrant could be required to shut down some facilities or materially alter its operations. Further, each Registrant may not be able to obtain or maintain all required environmental or other regulatory approvals and permits for its operating assets or development projects. Delays in, or active opposition by third parties to, obtaining any required environmental or regulatory authorizations or failure to comply with the terms and conditions of the authorizations may increase costs or prevent or delay each Registrant from operating its facilities, developing or favorably locating new facilities or expanding existing facilities. If any Registrant fails to comply with any environmental or other regulatory requirements, such Registrant may be subject to penalties and fines or other sanctions, including changes to the way its electricity generating facilities are operated that may adversely impact generation or how the Pipeline Companies are permitted to operate their systems that may adversely impact throughput. The costs of complying with laws and regulations could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results. Not being able to operate existing facilities or develop new generating facilities to meet customer electricity needs could require such Registrant to increase its purchases of electricity on the wholesale market, which could increase market and price risks and adversely affect such Registrant's financial results.

Existing laws and regulations, while comprehensive, are subject to changes and revisions from ongoing policy initiatives by legislators and regulators and to interpretations that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. For example, changes in laws and regulations could result in, but are not limited to, increased competition and decreased revenue within each Registrant's service territories; new environmental requirements, including the implementation of or changes to the Affordable Clean Energy rule, RPS and GHG emissions reduction goals; the issuance of new or stricter air quality standards; the implementation of energy efficiency mandates; the issuance of regulations governing the management and disposal of coal combustion byproducts; changes in forecasting requirements; changes to each Registrant's service territories as a result of condemnation or takeover by municipalities or other governmental entities, particularly where it lacks the exclusive right to serve its customers; the inability of each Registrant to recover its costs on a timely basis, if at all; new pipeline safety requirements; or a negative impact on each Registrant's current cost recovery arrangements. In addition to changes in existing legislation and regulation, new laws and regulations are likely to be enacted from time to time that impose additional or new requirements or standards on each Registrant. For example, in April 2022, the EPA proposed the "Cross-State Ozone Transport Rule", which contains requirements intended to address ozone transport between states through federally required nitrogen oxide reductions from fossil-fuel generating facilities. The rule included Wyoming, Utah and Nevada for the first time. If finalized as proposed, the rule will have impacts on PacifiCorp's coal-fueled generating facilities in both Utah and Wyoming that do not have an SCR as early as 2026 and threatens early coal-fueled unit retirements and reliability impacts. PacifiCorp has engaged with state and federal agencies to make adjustments to the rule and mitigate potential reliability impacts. Adverse rulings in GHG-related cases could result in increased or changed regulations and could increase costs for GHG emitters, including the Registrants' generating facilities. The GHG rules, changes to those rules, and the Registrants' compliance requirements are subject to potential outcomes from proceedings and litigation challenging the rules.

69


New federal, regional, state and international accords, legislation, regulation, or judicial proceedings limiting GHG emissions could have a material adverse impact on the Registrants, the U.S. and the global economy. Companies and industries with higher GHG emissions, such as utilities with significant coal-fueled generating facilities, will be subject to more direct impacts and greater financial and regulatory risks. The impact is dependent on numerous factors, none of which can be meaningfully quantified at this time. These factors include, but are not limited to, the magnitude and timing of GHG emissions reduction requirements; the design of the requirements; the cost, availability and effectiveness of emissions control technology; the price, distribution method and availability of offsets and allowances used for compliance; government-imposed compliance costs; and the existence and nature of incremental cost recovery mechanisms. Examples of how new requirements may impact the Registrants include:

Additional costs may be incurred to purchase required emissions allowances under any market-based cap-and-trade system in excess of allocations that are received at no cost. These purchases would be necessary until new technologies could be developed and deployed to reduce emissions or lower carbon generation is available;
Acquiring and renewing construction and operating permits for new and existing generating facilities may be costly and difficult;
Additional costs may be incurred to purchase and deploy new generating technologies;
Costs may be incurred to retire existing coal-fueled generating facilities before the end of their otherwise useful lives or to convert them to burn fuels, such as natural gas or biomass, that result in lower emissions;
Operating costs may be higher and generating unit outputs may be lower;
Higher interest and financing costs and reduced access to capital markets may result to the extent that financial markets view climate change and GHG emissions as a greater business risk; and
The relevant Registrant's natural gas pipeline operations and capacity sales, electric transmission and retail sales may be impacted in response to changes in customer demand and requirements to reduce GHG emissions.

The impact of events or conditions caused by climate change, whether from natural processes or human activities, are uncertain and could vary widely, from highly localized to worldwide, and the extent to which a utility's operations may be affected is uncertain. Climate change may cause physical and financial risks through, among other things, sea level rise, changes in precipitation and extreme weather events. Consumer demand for energy may increase or decrease, based on overall changes in weather and as customers promote lower energy consumption through the continued use of energy efficiency programs or other means. Availability of resources to generate electricity, such as water for hydroelectric production and cooling purposes, may also be impacted by climate change and could influence the Registrants' existing and future electricity generating portfolio. These issues may have a direct impact on the costs of electricity production and increase the price customers pay or their demand for electricity.

Implementing actions required under, and otherwise complying with, new federal and state laws and regulations and changes in existing ones are among the most challenging aspects of managing utility operations. The Registrants cannot accurately predict the type or scope of future laws and regulations that may be enacted, changes in existing ones or new interpretations by agency orders or court decisions, nor can each Registrant determine their impact on it at this time; however, any one of these could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results through higher capital expenditures and operating costs, early closure of generating facilities or lower tax benefits or restrict or otherwise cause an adverse change in how each Registrant operates its business. To the extent that each Registrant is not allowed by its regulators to recover or cannot otherwise recover the costs to comply with new laws and regulations or changes in existing ones, the costs of complying with such additional requirements could have a material adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's financial results. Additionally, even if such costs are recoverable in rates, if they are substantial and result in rates increasing to levels that substantially reduce customer demand, this could have a material adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's financial results.

Recovery of costs and certain activities by each Registrant is subject to regulatory review and approval, and the inability to recover costs or undertake certain activities may adversely affect each Registrant's financial results.

State Regulatory Rate Review Proceedings

The Utilities establish rates for their regulated retail service through state regulatory proceedings. These proceedings typically involve multiple parties, including government bodies and officials, consumer advocacy groups and various consumers of energy, who have differing concerns but generally have the common objective of limiting rate increases or requesting rate decreases while also requiring the Utilities to ensure system reliability. Decisions are subject to judicial appeal, potentially leading to further uncertainty associated with the approval proceedings.
70


States set retail rates based in part upon the state regulatory commission's acceptance of an allocated share of total utility costs. When states adopt different methods to calculate interjurisdictional cost allocations, some costs may not be incorporated into rates of any state or other jurisdiction. Ratemaking is also generally done on the basis of estimates of normalized costs, so if a given year's realized costs are higher than normalized costs, rates may not be sufficient to cover those costs. In some cases, actual costs are lower than the normalized or estimated costs recovered through rates and from time-to-time may result in a state regulator requiring refunds to customers. Each state regulatory commission generally sets rates based on a test year established in accordance with that commission's policies. The test year data adopted by each state regulatory commission may create a lag between the incurrence of a cost and its recovery in rates. Each state regulatory commission also decides the allowed levels of expense, investment and capital structure that it deems are prudently incurred in providing the service and may disallow recovery in rates for any costs that it believes do not meet such standard. Additionally, each state regulatory commission establishes the allowed rate of return the Utilities will be given an opportunity to earn on their sources of capital. While rate regulation is premised on providing a fair opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, the state regulatory commissions do not guarantee that each Registrant will be able to realize the allowed rate of return or recover all of its costs even if it believes such costs to be prudently incurred.

Some state regulatory commissions have authorized recovery of certain costs above the level assumed in establishing base rates through adjustment mechanisms, which may be subject to customer sharing. Any significant increase in fuel costs for electricity generation or purchased electricity costs could have a negative impact on the Utilities, despite efforts to minimize this impact through the use of hedging contracts and adjustment mechanisms or through future general regulatory rate reviews. Any of these consequences could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results.

FERC Jurisdiction

The FERC authorizes cost-based rates associated with transmission services provided by the Utilities' transmission facilities. Under the Federal Power Act, the Utilities, or MISO as it relates to MidAmerican Energy, may voluntarily file, or may be obligated to file, for changes, including general rate changes, to their system-wide transmission service rates. General rate changes implemented may be subject to refund. The FERC also has responsibility for approving both cost- and market-based rates under which the Utilities sell electricity in the wholesale market, has jurisdiction over most of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities and has broad jurisdiction over energy markets. The FERC may impose price limitations, bidding rules and other mechanisms to address some of the volatility of these markets or could revoke or restrict the ability of the Utilities to sell electricity at market-based rates, which could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results. The FERC also maintains rules concerning standards of conduct, affiliate restrictions, interlocking directorates and cross-subsidization. As a transmission owning member of MISO, MidAmerican Energy is also subject to MISO-directed modifications of market rules, which are subject to FERC approval and operational procedures. As participants in EIM, PacifiCorp, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific are also subject to applicable California ISO rules, which are subject to FERC approval and operational procedures. The FERC may also impose substantial civil penalties for any non-compliance with the Federal Power Act and the FERC's rules and orders.

The NERC has standards in place to ensure the reliability of the electric generation system and transmission grid. The Utilities are subject to the NERC's regulations and periodic audits to ensure compliance with those regulations. The NERC may carry out enforcement actions for non-compliance and administer significant financial penalties, subject to the FERC's review.

The FERC has jurisdiction over, among other things, the construction, abandonment, modification and operation of natural gas pipelines and related facilities used in the transportation, storage and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce, including all rates, charges and terms and conditions of service. The FERC also has market transparency authority and has adopted additional reporting and internet posting requirements for natural gas pipelines and buyers and sellers of natural gas.

Rates for the interstate natural gas transmission and storage operations at the Pipeline Companies, which include reservation, commodity, surcharges, fuel and gas lost and unaccounted for charges, are authorized by the FERC. In accordance with the FERC's ratemaking principles, the Pipeline Companies' current maximum tariff rates are designed to recover prudently incurred costs included in their pipeline system's regulatory cost of service that are associated with the construction, operation and maintenance of their pipeline system and to afford the Pipeline Companies an opportunity to earn a reasonable rate of return. Nevertheless, the rates the FERC authorizes the Pipeline Companies to charge their customers may not be sufficient to recover the costs incurred to provide services in any given period. Moreover, from time to time, the FERC may change, alter or refine its policies or methodologies for establishing pipeline rates and terms and conditions of service. In addition, the FERC has the authority under Section 5 of the Natural Gas Act of 1938 ("NGA") to investigate whether a pipeline may be earning more than its allowed rate of return and, when appropriate, to institute proceedings against such pipeline to prospectively reduce rates. Any such proceedings, if instituted, could result in significantly adverse rate decreases.

71


Under FERC policy, interstate pipelines and their customers may execute contracts at negotiated rates, which may be above or below the maximum tariff rate for that service or the pipeline may agree to provide a discounted rate, which would be a rate between the maximum and minimum tariff rates. In a rate proceeding, rates in these contracts are generally not subject to adjustment. It is possible that the cost to perform services under negotiated or discounted rate contracts will exceed the cost used in the determination of the negotiated or discounted rates, which could result either in losses or lower rates of return for providing such services. Under certain circumstances, FERC policy allows interstate natural gas pipelines to design new maximum tariff rates to recover such costs in regulatory rate reviews. However, with respect to discounts granted to affiliates, the interstate natural gas pipeline must demonstrate that the discounted rate was necessary in order to meet competition.

GEMA Jurisdiction

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies, as DNOs and holders of electricity distribution licenses, are subject to regulation by GEMA. Most of the revenue of a DNO is controlled by a distribution price control formula set out in the electricity distribution license. The price control formula does not directly constrain profits from year-to-year but is a control on revenue that operates independent of a significant portion of the DNO's actual costs. A resetting of the formula does not require the consent of the DNO, but if a licensee disagrees with a change to its license, it can appeal the matter to the United Kingdom's CMA. GEMA is able to impose financial penalties on DNOs that contravene any of their electricity distribution license duties or certain of their duties under British law or fail to achieve satisfactory performance of individual standards prescribed by GEMA. Any penalty imposed must be reasonable and may not exceed 10% of the DNO's revenue. During the term of any price control, additional costs have a direct impact on the financial results of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies.

AUC Jurisdiction

The AUC is an independent, quasi-judicial agency established by the province of Alberta, Canada, which is responsible for, among other things, approving the tariffs of transmission facility owners, including AltaLink, and distribution utilities, acquisitions of such transmission facility owners or utilities, and construction and operation of new transmission projects in Alberta. The AUC also investigates and rules on regulated rate disputes and system access problems.

The AUC regulates and oversees Alberta's electricity transmission sector with broad authority that may impact many of AltaLink's activities, including its tariffs, rates, construction, operations and financing. The AUC has various core functions in regulating the Alberta electricity transmission sector, including the following:
regulating and adjudicating issues related to the operation of electric utilities within Alberta;
processing and approving general tariff applications relating to revenue requirements, capital expenditure prudency and rates of return including deemed capital structure for regulated utilities while ensuring that utility rates are just and reasonable and approval of the transmission tariff rates of regulated transmission providers paid by the AESO, which is the independent transmission system operator in Alberta, Canada that controls the operation of AltaLink's transmission system;
approving the need for new electricity transmission facilities and permits to build and licenses to operate electricity transmission facilities;
reviewing operations and accounts from electric utilities and conducting on-site inspections to ensure compliance with industry regulations and standards;
adjudicating enforcement issues including the imposition of administrative penalties that arise when market participants violate the rules of the AESO; and
collecting, storing, analyzing, appraising and disseminating information to effectively fulfill its duties as an industry regulator.

In addition, AUC approval is required in connection with new energy and regulated utility initiatives in Alberta, amendments to existing approvals and financing proposals by designated utilities.

72


Physical or cyber attacks, both threatened and actual, could impact each Registrant's operations and could adversely affect its financial results.

Each Registrant relies on technology in virtually all aspects of its business. Like those of many large businesses, certain of the Registrant's technology systems have been subject to computer viruses, malicious codes, unauthorized access, phishing efforts, denial-of-service attacks and other cyber attacks and each Registrant expects to be subject to similar attacks in the future as such attacks become more sophisticated and frequent. A significant disruption or failure of its technology systems by physical or cyber attack could result in service interruptions, safety failures, security events, regulatory compliance failures, an inability to protect information and assets against unauthorized users, and other operational difficulties. Attacks perpetrated against each Registrant's systems could result in loss of assets and critical information and expose it to remediation costs and reputational damage.

Although the Registrants have taken steps intended to mitigate these risks, a significant disruption or cyber intrusion at one or more of each Registrant's operations could adversely affect the impacted Registrant's financial results. Cyber attacks could further adversely affect each Registrant's ability to operate facilities, information technology and business systems, or compromise sensitive customer and employee information. In addition, physical or cyber attacks against key suppliers or service providers could have a similar effect on each Registrant. Additionally, if each Registrant is unable to acquire, develop, implement, adopt or protect rights around new technology, it may suffer a competitive disadvantage.

Each Registrant is actively pursuing, developing and constructing new or expanded facilities, the completion and expected costs of which are subject to significant risk, and each Registrant has significant funding needs related to its planned capital expenditures.

Each Registrant actively pursues, develops and constructs new or expanded facilities. Each Registrant expects to incur significant annual capital expenditures over the next several years. Such expenditures may include construction and other costs for new electricity generating facilities, electric transmission or distribution projects, environmental control and compliance systems, natural gas storage facilities, new or expanded pipeline systems, and continued maintenance and upgrades of existing assets.

Development and construction of major facilities are subject to substantial risks, including fluctuations in the price and availability of commodities, manufactured goods, equipment, and the imposition of tariffs thereon when sourced by foreign providers, labor, siting and permitting and changes in environmental and operational compliance matters, load forecasts and other items over a multi-year construction period, as well as counterparty risk and the economic viability of the Registrants' suppliers, customers and contractors. Certain of the Registrants' construction projects are substantially dependent upon a single supplier or contractor and replacement of such supplier or contractor may be difficult and cannot be assured. These risks may result in the inability to timely complete a project or higher than expected costs to complete an asset and place it in-service and, in extreme cases, the loss of the power purchase agreements or other long-term off-take contracts underlying such projects. Such costs may not be recoverable in the regulated rates or market or contract prices each Registrant is able to charge its customers. Delays in construction of renewable projects may result in delayed in-service dates which may result in the loss of anticipated revenue or income tax benefits. It is also possible that additional generation needs may be obtained through power purchase agreements, which could increase long-term purchase obligations and force reliance on the operating performance of a third party. The inability to successfully and timely complete a project, avoid unexpected costs or recover any such costs could adversely affect such Registrant's financial results.

Furthermore, each Registrant depends upon both internal and external sources of liquidity to provide working capital and to fund capital requirements. If BHE does not provide needed funding to its subsidiaries and the subsidiaries are unable to obtain funding from external sources, they may need to postpone or cancel planned capital expenditures.

A significant sustained decrease in demand for electricity or natural gas in the markets served by each Registrant would decrease its operating revenue, could impact its planned capital expenditures and could adversely affect its financial results.

A significant sustained decrease in demand for electricity or natural gas in the markets served by each Registrant would decrease its operating revenue, could impact its planned capital expenditures and could adversely affect its financial results. Factors that could lead to a decrease in market demand include, among others:
a depression, recession or other adverse economic condition that results in a lower level of economic activity or reduced spending by consumers on electricity or natural gas;
an increase in the market price of electricity or natural gas or a decrease in the price of other competing forms of energy;
73


shifts in competitively priced natural gas supply sources away from the sources connected to the Pipeline Companies' systems, including shale gas sources;
efforts by customers, legislators and regulators to reduce the consumption of electricity generated or distributed by each Registrant through various existing laws and regulations, as well as, deregulation, conservation, energy efficiency and private generation measures and programs;
laws mandating or encouraging renewable energy sources, which may decrease the demand for electricity and natural gas or change the market prices of these commodities;
higher fuel taxes or other governmental or regulatory actions that increase, directly or indirectly, the cost of natural gas or other fuel sources for electricity generation or that limit the use of natural gas or the generation of electricity from fossil fuels;
a shift to more energy-efficient or alternative fuel machinery or an improvement in fuel economy, whether as a result of technological advances by manufacturers, legislation mandating higher fuel economy or lower emissions, price differentials, incentives or otherwise;
a reduction in the state or federal subsidies or tax incentives that are provided to agricultural, industrial or other customers, or a significant sustained change in prices for commodities such as ethanol or corn for ethanol manufacturers; and
sustained mild weather that reduces heating or cooling needs.

Each Registrant's operating results may fluctuate on a seasonal and quarterly basis and may be adversely affected by weather.

In most parts of the U.S. and other markets in which each Registrant operates, demand for electricity peaks during the summer months when irrigation and cooling needs are higher. Market prices for electricity also generally peak at that time. In other areas, including the western portion of PacifiCorp's service territory, demand for electricity peaks during the winter when heating needs are higher. In addition, demand for natural gas and other fuels generally peaks during the winter. This is especially true in MidAmerican Energy's and Sierra Pacific's retail natural gas businesses. Further, extreme weather conditions, such as heat waves, winter storms or floods could cause these seasonal fluctuations to be more pronounced. Periods of low rainfall or snowpack may negatively impact electricity generation at PacifiCorp's hydroelectric generating facilities, which may result in greater purchases of electricity from the wholesale market or from other sources at market prices. Additionally, PacifiCorp and MidAmerican Energy have added substantial wind-powered generating capacity, and BHE's unregulated subsidiaries are adding solar-powered and wind-powered generating capacity, each of which is also a climate-dependent resource.

As a result, the overall financial results of each Registrant may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal and quarterly basis. Each Registrant has historically provided less service, and consequently earned less income, when weather conditions are mild. Unusually mild weather in the future may adversely affect each Registrant's financial results through lower revenue or margins. Conversely, unusually extreme weather conditions could increase each Registrant's costs to provide services and could adversely affect its financial results. The extent of fluctuation in each Registrant's financial results may change depending on a number of factors related to its regulatory environment and contractual agreements, including its ability to recover energy costs, the existence of revenue sharing provisions as it relates to MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, and terms of its wholesale sale contracts.

74


Each Registrant is subject to market risk associated with the wholesale energy markets, which could adversely affect its financial results.

In general, each Registrant's primary market risk is adverse fluctuations in the market price of wholesale electricity and fuel, including natural gas, coal and fuel oil, which is compounded by volumetric changes affecting the availability of or demand for electricity and fuel. The market price of wholesale electricity may be influenced by several factors, such as the adequacy or type of generating capacity, scheduled and unscheduled outages of generating facilities, prices and availability of fuel sources for generation, disruptions or constraints to transmission and distribution facilities, weather conditions, demand for electricity, economic growth and changes in technology. Volumetric changes are caused by fluctuations in generation or changes in customer needs that can be due to the weather, electricity and fuel prices, the economy, regulations or customer behavior. For example, the Utilities purchase electricity and fuel in the open market as part of their normal operating businesses. If market prices rise, especially in a time when larger than expected volumes must be purchased at market prices, the Utilities may incur significantly greater expenses than anticipated. Likewise, if electricity market prices decline in a period when the Utilities are a net seller of electricity in the wholesale market, the Utilities could earn less revenue. Although the Utilities have ECAMs, the risks associated with changes in market prices may not be fully mitigated due to customer sharing bands as it relates to PacifiCorp and other factors.

Potential terrorist activities and the impact of military or other actions, including sanctions, export controls and similar measures, could adversely affect each Registrant's financial results.

The ongoing threat of terrorism and the impact of military or other actions by nations or politically, ethnically or religiously motivated organizations regionally or globally may create increased political, economic, social and financial market instability, which could subject each Registrant's operations to increased risks. Additionally, the U.S. government has issued warnings that energy assets, specifically pipeline, nuclear generation, transmission and other electric utility infrastructure, are potential targets for terrorist attacks. Further, the potential or actual outbreak of war or other hostilities, such as Russia's invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 and the resulting economic sanctions on Russia and the sale of Russian natural gas and petroleum, as well as the existing and potential further responses from Russia or other countries to such sanctions and military actions, could adversely affect global and regional economies and financial markets. For instance, the current ban on imports of Russian oil, liquefied natural gas and coal to the U.S. could contribute to increases in prices for such commodities in the U.S. and elsewhere which could adversely affect each Registrant's business. Further, each Registrant's business must be conducted in compliance with applicable economic and trade sanctions laws and regulations, including those administered and enforced by the U.S. Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control, the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. Department of Commerce, the United Nations Security Council and other relevant governmental authorities in the U.S., Canada, the United Kingdom and European Union, which include sanctions that could potentially restrict or prohibit each Registrant's relationships with certain suppliers and customers. Political, economic, social or financial market instability or damage to or interference with the operating assets of the Registrants, customers or suppliers, or continued increases in the price of natural gas and other petroleum commodities may result in business interruptions, lost revenue, higher costs, disruption in fuel supplies, lower energy consumption and unstable markets, particularly with respect to electricity and natural gas, and increased security, repair or other costs, any of which may materially adversely affect each Registrant in ways that cannot be predicted at this time. Any of these risks could materially affect BHE's consolidated financial results. Furthermore, instability in the financial markets as a result of terrorism or war could also materially adversely affect each Registrant's ability to raise capital.

75


Certain Registrants are subject to the unique risks associated with nuclear generation.

The ownership and operation of nuclear generating facilities, such as MidAmerican Energy's 25% ownership interest in Quad Cities Station, involves certain risks. These risks include, among other items, mechanical or structural problems, inadequacy or lapses in maintenance protocols, the impairment of reactor operation and safety systems due to human error, the costs of storage, handling and disposal of nuclear materials, compliance with and changes in regulation of nuclear generating facilities, limitations on the amounts and types of insurance coverage commercially available, and uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear facilities at the end of their useful lives. Additionally, Constellation Energy, the 75% owner and operator of the facility, may respond to the occurrence of any of these or other risks in a manner that negatively impacts MidAmerican Energy, including closure of Quad Cities Station prior to the expiration of its operating license. The prolonged unavailability, or early closure, of Quad Cities Station due to operational or economic factors could have a materially adverse effect on the relevant Registrant's financial results, particularly when the cost to produce power at the generating facility is significantly less than market wholesale prices. The following are among the more significant of these risks:
Operational Risk - Operations at any nuclear generating facility could degrade to the point where the generating facility would have to be shut down. If such degradations were to occur, the process of identifying and correcting the causes of the operational downgrade to return the generating facility to operation could require significant time and expenses, resulting in both lost revenue and increased fuel and purchased electricity costs to meet supply commitments. Rather than incurring substantial costs to restart the generating facility, the generating facility could be shut down. Furthermore, a shut-down or failure at any other nuclear generating facility could cause regulators to require a shut-down or reduced availability at Quad Cities Station.
In addition, issues relating to the disposal of nuclear waste material, including the availability, unavailability and expenses of a permanent repository for spent nuclear fuel could adversely impact operations as well as the cost and ability to decommission nuclear generating facilities, including Quad Cities Station, in the future.

Regulatory Risk - The NRC may modify, suspend or revoke licenses and impose civil penalties for failure to comply with applicable Atomic Energy Act regulations or the terms of the licenses of nuclear facilities. Unless extended, the NRC operating licenses for Quad Cities Station will expire in 2032. Changes in regulations by the NRC could require a substantial increase in capital expenditures or result in increased operating or decommissioning costs.

Nuclear Accident and Catastrophic Risks - Accidents and other unforeseen catastrophic events have occurred at nuclear facilities other than Quad Cities Station, both in the U.S. and elsewhere, such as at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear generating facility in Japan as a result of the earthquake and tsunami in March 2011. The consequences of an accident or catastrophic event can be severe and include loss of life and property damage. Any resulting liability from a nuclear accident or catastrophic event could exceed the relevant Registrant's resources, including insurance coverage.

Certain of BHE's subsidiaries are subject to the risk that customers will not renew their contracts or that BHE's subsidiaries will be unable to obtain new customers for expanded capacity, each of which could adversely affect its financial results.

If BHE's subsidiaries are unable to renew, remarket, or find replacements for their customer agreements on favorable terms, BHE's subsidiaries' sales volumes and operating revenue would be exposed to reduction and increased volatility. For example, without the benefit of long-term transportation agreements, BHE cannot assure that the Pipeline Companies will be able to transport natural gas at efficient capacity levels. Substantially all of the Pipeline Companies' revenue is generated under transportation, storage and LNG contracts that periodically must be renegotiated and extended or replaced, and the Pipeline Companies are dependent upon relatively few customers for a substantial portion of their revenue. Similarly, without long-term power purchase agreements, BHE cannot assure that its unregulated power generators will be able to operate profitably. Failure to maintain existing long-term agreements or secure new long-term agreements, or being required to discount rates significantly upon renewal or replacement, could adversely affect BHE's consolidated financial results. The replacement of any existing long-term agreements depends on market conditions and other factors that may be beyond BHE's subsidiaries' control.

76


Each Registrant is subject to counterparty risk, which could adversely affect its financial results.

Each Registrant is subject to counterparty credit risk related to contractual payment obligations with wholesale suppliers and customers. Adverse economic conditions or other events affecting counterparties with whom each Registrant conducts business could impair the ability of these counterparties to meet their payment obligations. Each Registrant depends on these counterparties to remit payments on a timely basis. Each Registrant continues to monitor the creditworthiness of its wholesale suppliers and customers in an attempt to reduce the impact of any potential counterparty default. If strategies used to minimize these risk exposures are ineffective or if any Registrant's wholesale suppliers' or customers' financial condition deteriorates or they otherwise become unable to pay, it could have a significant adverse impact on each Registrant's liquidity and its financial results.

Each Registrant is subject to counterparty performance risk related to performance of contractual obligations by wholesale suppliers, customers and contractors. Each Registrant relies on wholesale suppliers to deliver commodities, primarily natural gas, coal and electricity, in accordance with short- and long-term contracts. Failure or delay by suppliers to provide these commodities pursuant to existing contracts could disrupt the delivery of electricity and require the Utilities to incur additional expenses to meet customer needs. In addition, when these contracts terminate, the Utilities may be unable to purchase the commodities on terms equivalent to the terms of current contracts.

Each Registrant relies on wholesale customers to take delivery of the energy they have committed to purchase. Failure of customers to take delivery may require the relevant Registrant to find other customers to take the energy at lower prices than the original customers committed to pay. If each Registrant's wholesale customers are unable to fulfill their obligations, there may be a significant adverse impact on its financial results.

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' customers are concentrated in a small number of electricity supply businesses with E.ON and British Gas Trading Limited accounting for approximately 22% and 14%, respectively, of distribution revenue in 2022. AltaLink's primary source of operating revenue is the AESO. Generally, a single customer purchases the energy from BHE's independent power projects in the U.S. pursuant to long-term power purchase agreements. For example, certain of BHE Renewables' solar and wind independent power projects sell all of their electrical production to either PG&E or SCE, respectively. Any material payment or other performance failure by the counterparties in these arrangements could have a significant adverse impact on BHE's consolidated financial results.

BHE owns investments in foreign countries that are exposed to risks related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and increased economic, regulatory and political risks.

BHE's business operations and investments outside the U.S. increase its risk related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily the British pound and the Canadian dollar. BHE's principal reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, and the value of the assets and liabilities, earnings, cash flows and potential distributions from its foreign operations changes with the fluctuations of the currency in which they transact. BHE may selectively reduce some foreign currency exchange rate risk by, among other things, requiring contracted amounts be settled in, or indexed to, U.S. dollars or a currency freely convertible into U.S. dollars, or hedging through foreign currency derivatives. These efforts, however, may not be effective and could negatively affect BHE's consolidated financial results.

In addition to any disruption in the global financial markets, the economic, regulatory and political conditions in some of the countries where BHE has operations or is pursuing investment opportunities may present increased risks related to, among others, inflation, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, currency repatriation restrictions, nationalization, renegotiation, privatization, availability of financing on suitable terms, customer creditworthiness, construction delays, business interruption, political instability, civil unrest, guerilla activity, terrorism, pandemics (including potentially in relation to COVID-19 variants), expropriation, trade sanctions, contract nullification and changes in law, regulations or tax policy. BHE may not choose to or be capable of either fully insuring against or effectively hedging these risks.

77


Poor performance of plan and fund investments and other factors impacting the pension and other postretirement benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning and mine reclamation trust funds could unfavorably impact each Registrant's cash flows, liquidity and financial results.

Costs of providing each Registrant's defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans and costs associated with the joint trustee plan to which PacifiCorp contributes depend upon a number of factors, including the rates of return on plan assets, the level and nature of benefits provided, discount rates, mortality assumptions, the interest rates used to measure required minimum funding levels, the funded status of the plans, changes in benefit design, tax deductibility and funding limits, changes in laws and government regulation and each Registrant's required or voluntary contributions made to the plans. Furthermore, the timing of recognition of unrecognized gains and losses associated with the Registrants' defined benefit pension plans is subject to volatility due to events that may give rise to settlement accounting. Settlement events resulting from lump sum distributions offered by certain of the Registrants' defined benefit pension plans are influenced by the interest rates used to discount a participant's lump sum distribution. When the applicable interest rates are low, lump sum distributions in a given year tend to increase resulting in a higher likelihood of triggering settlement accounting.

If the Registrant's pension and other postretirement benefit plans are in underfunded positions, the respective Registrant may be required to make cash contributions to fund such underfunded plans in the future. Additionally, each Registrant's plans have investments in domestic and foreign equity and debt securities and other investments that are subject to loss. Losses from investments could add to the volatility, size and timing of future contributions.

Furthermore, the funded status of the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan multiemployer plan to which PacifiCorp's subsidiary previously contributed is considered critical and declining. PacifiCorp's subsidiary involuntarily withdrew from the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan in June 2015 when the UMWA employees ceased performing work for the subsidiary. PacifiCorp has recorded its best estimate of the withdrawal obligation.

In addition, MidAmerican Energy is required to fund over time the projected costs of decommissioning Quad Cities Station, a nuclear generating facility, and Bridger Coal Company, a joint venture of PacifiCorp's subsidiary, Pacific Minerals, Inc., is required to fund projected mine reclamation costs. The funds that MidAmerican Energy has invested in a nuclear decommissioning trust and a subsidiary of PacifiCorp has invested in a mine reclamation trust are invested in debt and equity securities and poor performance of these investments will reduce the amount of funds available for their intended purpose, which could require MidAmerican Energy or PacifiCorp's subsidiary to make additional cash contributions. As contributions to the trust are being made over the operating life of the respective facility, reductions in the expected operating life of the facility could also require MidAmerican Energy and PacifiCorp's subsidiary to make additional contributions to the related trust. Such cash funding obligations, which are also impacted by the other factors described above, could have a material impact on MidAmerican Energy's or PacifiCorp's liquidity by reducing their available cash.

Inflation and changes in commodity prices and fuel transportation costs may adversely affect each Registrant's financial results.

Inflation and increases in commodity prices and fuel transportation costs may affect each Registrant by increasing both operating and capital costs. As a result of existing rate agreements, contractual arrangements or competitive price pressures, each Registrant may not be able to pass the costs of inflation on to its customers. If each Registrant is unable to manage cost increases or pass them on to its customers, its financial results could be adversely affected.

Cyclical fluctuations and competition in the residential real estate brokerage and mortgage businesses could adversely affect HomeServices.

The residential real estate brokerage and mortgage industries tend to experience cycles of greater and lesser activity and profitability and are typically affected by changes in economic conditions, which are beyond HomeServices' control. Any of the following, among others, are examples of items that could have a material adverse effect on HomeServices' businesses by causing a general decline in the number of home sales, sale prices or the number of home financings which, in turn, would adversely affect its financial results:
rising interest rates or unemployment rates, including a sustained high unemployment rate in the U.S.;
periods of economic slowdown or recession in the markets served or the adverse effects on market actions as a result of epidemics, pandemics or other outbreaks;
decreasing home affordability;
78


lack of available mortgage credit for potential homebuyers, such as the reduced availability of credit, which may continue into future periods;
inadequate home inventory levels;
sources of new competition; and
changes in applicable tax law.

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect each Registrant's ability to obtain debt financing or to draw upon or renew existing credit facilities and have other adverse effects on each Registrant.

Disruptions in the financial markets could affect each Registrant's ability to obtain debt financing or to draw upon or renew existing credit facilities and have other adverse effects on each Registrant. Significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions in the U.S., Great Britain, Canada and global credit markets, such as those that occurred in 2008, 2009 and 2020, may materially impact liquidity in the bank and debt capital markets, making financing terms less attractive for borrowers that are able to find financing and, in other cases, may cause certain types of debt financing, or any financing, to be unavailable. Additionally, economic uncertainty in the U.S. or globally may adversely affect the U.S. credit markets and could negatively impact each Registrant's ability to access funds on favorable terms or at all. If a Registrant is unable to access the bank and debt markets to meet liquidity and capital expenditure needs, it may adversely affect the timing and amount of its capital expenditures, acquisition financing and its financial results.

Each Registrant is involved in a variety of legal proceedings, the outcomes of which are uncertain and could adversely affect its financial results.

Each Registrant is, and in the future may become, a party to a variety of legal proceedings. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, and the Registrants cannot predict the outcome of individual matters with certainty. It is possible that the final resolution of some of the matters in which each Registrant is involved could result in additional material payments substantially in excess of established liabilities or in terms that could require each Registrant to change business practices and procedures or divest ownership of assets. Further, litigation could result in the imposition of financial penalties or injunctions and adverse regulatory consequences, any of which could limit each Registrant's ability to take certain desired actions or the denial of needed permits, licenses or regulatory authority to conduct its business, including the siting or permitting of facilities. Any of these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on such Registrant's financial results.

Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2.Properties

Each Registrant's energy properties consist of the physical assets necessary to support its electricity and natural gas businesses. Properties of the relevant Registrant's electricity businesses include electric generation, transmission and distribution facilities, as well as coal mining assets that support certain of PacifiCorp's electric generating facilities. Properties of the relevant Registrant's natural gas businesses include natural gas distribution facilities, interstate pipelines, storage facilities, LNG facilities, compressor stations and meter stations. The transmission and distribution assets are primarily within each Registrant's service territories. In addition to these physical assets, the Registrants have rights-of-way, mineral rights and water rights that enable each Registrant to utilize its facilities. It is the opinion of each Registrant's management that the principal depreciable properties owned by it are in good operating condition and are well maintained. Pursuant to separate financing agreements, substantially all of PacifiCorp's electric utility properties, MidAmerican Energy's electric utility properties in the state of Iowa, Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's properties in the state of Nevada, AltaLink's transmission properties and substantially all of the assets of the subsidiaries of BHE Renewables that are direct or indirect owners of generation projects are pledged or encumbered to support or otherwise provide the security for the related subsidiary debt. For additional information regarding each Registrant's energy properties, refer to Item 1 of this Form 10-K and Notes 4, 5 and 22 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements of MidAmerican Energy in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Nevada Power in Item 8 of this Form 10-K, Notes 3 and 4 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Sierra Pacific in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and Notes 4 and 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Eastern Energy Gas in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

79


The following table summarizes Berkshire Hathaway Energy's operating electric generating facilities as of December 31, 2022:
Facility NetNet Owned
EnergyCapacityCapacity
SourceEntityLocation by Significance(MWs)(MWs)
WindPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, BHE Canada, BHE Montana and BHE RenewablesIowa, Wyoming, Texas, Montana, Nebraska, Washington, California, Illinois, Canada, Oregon and Kansas12,282 12,282 
Natural gasPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, NV Energy, BHE Canada and BHE RenewablesNevada, Utah, Iowa, Illinois, Washington, Wyoming, Oregon, Texas, New York, Arizona and Canada11,284 11,005 
CoalPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and NV EnergyWyoming, Iowa, Utah, Nevada, Colorado and Montana13,210 8,178 
SolarMidAmerican Energy, NV Energy, Northern Powergrid and BHE RenewablesCalifornia, Australia, Texas, Arizona, Iowa, Minnesota and Nevada2,120 1,972 
HydroelectricPacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and BHE RenewablesWashington, Oregon, Idaho, Utah, Hawaii, Montana, Illinois, California and Wyoming985 985 
NuclearMidAmerican EnergyIllinois1,822 455 
GeothermalPacifiCorp and BHE RenewablesCalifornia and Utah377 377 
Total42,080 35,254 

Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, the Company has electric generating facilities that are under construction in Nevada and Wyoming having total Facility Net Capacity and Net Owned Capacity of 243 MWs.

The right to construct and operate each Registrant's electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines across certain property was obtained in most circumstances through negotiations and, where necessary, through prescription, eminent domain or similar rights. PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific, BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas and Kern River in the U.S.; Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc in Great Britain; and AltaLink in Alberta, Canada continue to have the power of eminent domain or similar rights in each of the jurisdictions in which they operate their respective facilities, but the U.S. and Canadian utilities do not have the power of eminent domain with respect to governmental, Native American or Canadian First Nations' tribal lands. Although the main Kern River pipeline crosses the Moapa Indian Reservation, all facilities in the Moapa Indian Reservation are located within a utility corridor that is reserved to the U.S. Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management.

With respect to real property, each of the electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines fall into two basic categories: (1) parcels that are owned in fee, such as certain of the electric generating facilities, electric substations, natural gas compressor stations, natural gas meter stations and office sites; and (2) parcels where the interest derives from leases, easements (including prescriptive easements), rights-of-way, permits or licenses from landowners or governmental authorities permitting the use of such land for the construction, operation and maintenance of the electric transmission and distribution facilities and interstate natural gas pipelines. Each Registrant believes it has satisfactory title or interest to all of the real property making up their respective facilities in all material respects.

80


Item 3.Legal Proceedings

Berkshire Hathaway Energy and PacifiCorp

On September 30, 2020, a putative class action complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885, Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by Oregon residents and businesses who seek to represent a class of all Oregon citizens and entities whose real or personal property was harmed beginning on September 7, 2020, by wildfires in Oregon allegedly caused by PacifiCorp. On November 3, 2021, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint to limit the class to include Oregon citizens allegedly impacted by the Echo Mountain Complex, South Obenchain, Two Four Two and Santiam Canyon fires, as well as to add claims for noneconomic damages. The amended complaint alleges that PacifiCorp's assets contributed to the Oregon wildfires occurring on or after September 7, 2020 and that PacifiCorp acted with gross negligence, among other things. The amended complaint seeks the following damages for the plaintiffs and the putative class: (i) noneconomic damages, including mental suffering, emotional distress, inconvenience and interference with normal and usual activities, in excess of $1 billion; (ii) damages for real and personal property and other economic losses of not less than $600 million; (iii) double the amount of property and economic damages; (iv) treble damages for specific costs associated with loss of timber, trees and shrubbery; (v) double the damages for the costs of litigation and reforestation; (vi) prejudgment interest; and (vii) reasonable attorney fees, investigation costs and expert witness fees. The plaintiffs demand a trial by jury and have reserved their right to further amend the complaint to allege claims for punitive damages. In May 2022, the Multnomah Circuit Court granted issue class certification and consolidated this case with others as described below. PacifiCorp requested an immediate appeal of the issue class certification before the Oregon Court of Appeals. In January 2023, the Oregon Court of Appeals denied PacifiCorp's request for appeal. In February 2023, the plaintiffs filed a motion to amend the complaint to add punitive damages in an unspecified amount.

On August 20, 2021, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Shylo Salter et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV33595, Multnomah County, Oregon, in which two complaints, Case No. 21CV09339 and Case No. 21CV09520, previously filed in Circuit Court, Marion County, Oregon, were combined. The plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the previously filed complaints in Marion County, Oregon. The refiled complaint was filed by Oregon residents and businesses who allege that they were injured by the Beachie Creek fire, which the plaintiffs allege began on or around September 7, 2020, but which government reports indicate began on or around August 16, 2020. The complaint alleges that PacifiCorp's assets contributed to the Beachie Creek fire and that PacifiCorp acted with gross negligence, among other things. The complaint seeks the following damages: (i) damages related to real and personal property in an amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, estimated not to exceed $75 million; (ii) other economic losses in an amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, but not to exceed $75 million; (iii) noneconomic damages in the amount determined by the jury to be fair and reasonable, but not to exceed $500 million; (iv) double the damages for economic and property damages under specified Oregon statutes; (v) alternatively, treble the damages under specified Oregon statutes; (vi) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre- and post-judgment interest. The plaintiffs demand a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint with an intent to add a claim for punitive damages. In May 2022, this case was consolidated with others as described below.

In May 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court granted plaintiffs' motion to consolidate Shylo Salter et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV33595 (described above) and Amy Allen, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 20CV37430 ("Allen") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). Plaintiffs' motion to bifurcate issues for trial between class-wide liability and individual damages was also granted. The Allen case was filed by five individuals as amended in September 2021 claiming in excess of $32 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- and post-judgment interest.

In June 2022, an amended complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Tim Goforth et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 20CV37637, Douglas County, Oregon, in which a previously filed complaint associated with the Archie Creek, Susan Creek and Smith Springs Road fires in Douglas County in September 2020 was amended to add punitive damages. The complaint alleges (i) PacifiCorp's conduct not only constituted common law negligence but gross negligence and contributed to or was the cause of ignition and spread of the aforementioned fires; (ii) PacifiCorp violated certain Oregon rules and regulations; and (iii) as an alternative to negligence, inverse condemnation. The complaint seeks the following damages: (i) economic and property damages of $11 million under a determination of negligence or inverse condemnation and subject to doubling under Oregon statute if applicable; (ii) doubling of those economic and property damages to $22 million under a determination of gross negligence; (iii) damages for injuries in excess of $47 million; (iv) punitive damages not to exceed 10 times the amount of non-economic damages awarded; (v) all costs of the lawsuit; (vi) pre- and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and (vii) attorneys' fees and other costs. Pursuant to a settlement stipulation agreed to in November 2022, the Douglas County Circuit Court issued an order dismissing the case with prejudice and without costs, disbursements or attorney fees to any of the parties.

81


On August 26, 2022, a putative class action complaint seeking declaratory and equitable relief against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Margaret Dietrich et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29187, Circuit Court, Multnomah County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by two Oregon residents individually and on behalf of a class initially defined to include residents of, business owners in, real or personal property owners in and any other individuals physically present in specified Oregon counties as of September 7, 2020 who experienced any harm, damage or loss as a result of the Santiam, Beachie Creek, Lionshead, Echo Mountain Complex, Two Four Two or South Obenchain fires in September 2020. The complaint was amended on September 6, 2022, to seek damages of over $900 million that were originally demanded on August 4, 2022, pursuant to Oregon Rule of Civil Procedure 32 H. The amended complaint alleges: (i) negligence due to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules; (ii) gross negligence due to alleged conscious indifference to or reckless disregard for the probable consequences of defendant's actions or inactions; (iii) private nuisance; (iv) public nuisance; (v) trespass; (vi) inverse condemnation; (vii) accounting/injunction; (viii) negligent infliction of emotional distress. The amended complaint seeks the following: (i) an order certifying the matter as a class action; (ii) economic damages not less than $400 million; (iii) double the amount of economic and property damages to the extent applicable under Oregon statute; (iv) reasonable costs of reforestation activities; (v) doubling and trebling of certain other damages to the extent applicable under certain Oregon statutes; (vi) noneconomic damages not less than $500 million; (vii) prejudgment interest; (viii) an order requiring an accounting with respect to the amount of damages; (ix) an order enjoining PacifiCorp from leaving power lines energized in areas of Oregon experiencing extremely critical fire conditions; (x) an award of reasonable attorney fees, costs, investigation costs, disbursements and expert witness fees; and (xi) other relief the court finds appropriate. The plaintiffs and proposed class demand a trial by jury. On December 19, 2022, the Dietrich case was consolidated into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above) and is currently stayed.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Martin Klinger et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29674, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Klinger"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Jeremiah E. Bowen et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29681, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Bowen"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned James Weathers et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29683, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Weathers"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 6, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Blair Barnholdt et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30097, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Barnholdt"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Estate of Nancy Darlene Hunter, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30214, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Hunter"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Willard K. Pratt et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30217, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Pratt"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 7, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned April Thompson et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30451, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Thompson"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents, occupants and real and personal property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.


82


The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Hunter, Pratt and Thompson cases are in the process of being consolidated with Sparkset al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV48022 ("Sparks")and Russieet al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV15840 ("Russie") into Ashley Andersen et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 21CV36567 ("Andersen"). The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson complaints each allege: (i) negligence due in part to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules, including those issued by the OPUC; (ii) gross negligence alleged in the form of willful, wanton and reckless disregard of known risks to the public; (iii) trespass; (iv) nuisance; and (v) inverse condemnation. The Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson complaints each seek the following damages: (i) economic and property related damages of $83 million; (ii) doubling of those economic and property related damages to $167 million to the extent eligible for doubling of damages under the specified Oregon statute; (iii) non-economic damages to the plaintiffs' persons in an amount not less than $83 million for physical injury, mental suffering, emotional distress and other damages; (iv) loss of wages, loss of earnings capacity, evacuation expenses, displacement expenses and similar damages; (v) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre-judgment interest. The plaintiffs for each Klinger, Bowen, Weathers, Barnholdt, Pratt and Thompson request a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. The Hunter complaint seeks $50 million in damages and alleges claims for: (i) negligence, (ii) trespass, (iii), nuisance, (iv) inverse condemnation, and (v) wrongful death. The Andersen case was filed by 50 individuals as amended in August 2022 seeking $250 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest. The Sparks case was filed by 17 individuals in December 2021 claiming $125 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- judgment interest. The Russie case was filed by 45 individuals as amended in September 2022 seeking $250 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest.

On September 1, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Aaron Macy-Wyngarden et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29684, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Macy-Wyngarden"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Beachie Creek, Santiam Canyon, Lionshead and Riverside fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

On September 22, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Zachary Bogle et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29717, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Bogle"). The complaint was filed by Oregon residents who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Beachie Creek, Santiam Canyon, Lionshead and Riverside fires. The allegations made and damages sought are described below.

The Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle complaints each allege: (i) negligence due in part to alleged failure to comply with certain Oregon statutes and administrative rules, including those issued by the OPUC; (ii) gross negligence alleged in the form of willful, wanton and reckless disregard of known risks to the public; (iii) trespass; (iv) nuisance; and (v) inverse condemnation. The Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle complaints each seek the following damages: (i) economic and property related damages of $83 million; (ii) doubling of those economic and property related damages to $167 million to the extent eligible for doubling of damages under the specified Oregon statute; (iii) non-economic damages to the plaintiffs' persons in an amount not less than $83 million for physical injury, mental suffering, emotional distress and other damages; (iv) loss of wages, loss of earnings capacity, evacuation expenses, displacement expenses and similar damages; (v) attorneys' fees and other costs; and (vii) pre-judgment interest. The plaintiffs for each Macy-Wyngarden and Bogle request a trial by jury and have reserved their right to amend the complaint to add a claim for punitive damages.

On September 2, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Logan et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29859, Multnomah County, Oregon ("Logan"). The Logan complaint was filed by Oregon residents or Oregon property owners who allege injuries and damages resulting from the September 2020 Echo Mountain Complex fires. The Logan case is in the process of being consolidated with Cady et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV13946 ("Cady") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Logan and Cady complaints each allege: (i) negligence; (ii) trespass; (iii) nuisance, and (iv) inverse condemnation. The Logan case was filed by five individuals claiming $10 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre- and post-judgment interest. The Cady case was filed by 21 individuals as amended in April 2022 claiming $10 million in economic and noneconomic damages, as well as claims for statutory doubling or trebling of damages, attorneys' fees and other costs and pre-judgment interest.

83


On October 14, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV26326 ("21st Century") and Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29976 into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The 21st Century and Allstate complaints were each filed by subrogated insurance carriers alleging claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, and (iii) inverse condemnation resulting from the September 2020 Santiam Canyon, Echo Mountain Complex, 242, and South Obenchain fires. The 21st Century case was filed in August 2022 by 177 insurance carriers seeking $20 million in damages. The Allstate case was filed in September 2022 by 11 insurance carriers seeking $40 million in damages.

On October 17, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated Michael Bell, et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV30450 ("Bell") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Bell case was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon on September 7, 2022, by 59 plaintiffs seeking $35 million in damages for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) trespass, (iii) nuisance, and (iv) inverse condemnation.

On October 19, 2022, the Multnomah County Circuit Court consolidated Freres Timber, Inc. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV29694 ("Freres") into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above). The Freres case was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon on September 1, 2022, by one plaintiff and seeks $40m for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, and (iii) inverse condemnation.

On December 6, 2022, CW Specialty Lumber, Inc., et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV41640 ("CW Specialty") was filed in Oregon Circuit Court in Multnomah County, Oregon by two plaintiffs seeking $28.6 million in damages for claims of (i) negligence, (ii) gross negligence, (iii) trespass, and (iv) inverse condemnation. The CW Specialty case is in the process of being consolidated into Jeanyne James et al. v. PacifiCorp et al., Case No. 20CV33885 (described above).

Other individual lawsuits alleging similar claims have been filed in Oregon and California related to the 2020 Wildfires, including multiple complaints filed in California for the September 2020 Slater Fire. Multiple complaints have also been filed in California for the 2022 McKinney fire. The complaints filed in California do not specify damages sought. Investigations into the causes and origins of those wildfires are ongoing. For more information regarding certain legal proceedings affecting Berkshire Hathaway Energy, refer to Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of Berkshire Hathaway Energy in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K, and PacifiCorp, refer to Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

PacifiCorp

On March 17, 2022, a complaint against PacifiCorp was filed, captioned Roseburg Resources Co et al. v. PacifiCorp, Case No. 22CV09346, Circuit Court, Douglas County, Oregon. The complaint was filed by nine businesses and public pension plans that own and/or operate timberlands or possess property in Douglas County who allege damages, losses and injuries associated with their timberlands as a result of the French Creek, Archie Creek, Susan Creek and Smith Springs Road fires in Douglas County in September 2020. The complaint alleges (i) PacifiCorp's conduct constituted not only common law negligence but also gross negligence and that such conduct contributed to or caused the ignition and spread of the aforementioned fires; (ii) PacifiCorp violated certain Oregon rules and regulations; and (iii) as an alternative to negligence, inverse condemnation. The complaint seeks the following damages as amended: (i) economic and property damages in excess of $195 million under a determination of negligence or inverse condemnation; (ii) doubling of those economic damages to in excess of $390 million under a determination of gross negligence pursuant to Oregon statutes; (iii) all costs of the lawsuit; (iv) prejudgment and post-judgment interest as allowed by law; and (v) attorneys' fees and other costs.

Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures

Information regarding Berkshire Hathaway Energy's and PacifiCorp's mine safety violations and other legal matters disclosed in accordance with Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act is included in Exhibit 95 to this Form 10-K.

84


PART II

Item 5.Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY

BHE's common stock is beneficially owned by Berkshire Hathaway and family members and related or affiliated entities of the late Mr. Walter Scott, Jr., a former member of BHE's Board of Directors, and has not been registered with the SEC pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, listed on a stock exchange or otherwise publicly held or traded. BHE has not declared or paid any cash dividends to its common shareholders since Berkshire Hathaway acquired an equity ownership interest in BHE in March 2000 and does not presently anticipate that it will declare any dividends on its common stock in the foreseeable future.

PACIFICORP

All common stock of PacifiCorp is held by its parent company, PPW Holdings LLC, which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. PacifiCorp declared and paid dividends to PPW Holdings LLC of $300 million in 2023, $100 million in 2022 and $150 million in 2021.

MIDAMERICAN FUNDING AND MIDAMERICAN ENERGY

All common stock of MidAmerican Energy is held by its parent company, MHC, which is a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of MidAmerican Funding. MidAmerican Funding is an Iowa limited liability company whose membership interest is held solely by BHE. MidAmerican Funding declared and paid cash distributions to BHE of $100 million in 2023, $69 million in 2022 and $— million in 2021. MidAmerican Energy declared and paid cash dividends to MHC totaling $100 million in 2023, $275 million in 2022 and $— million in 2021.

NEVADA POWER

All common stock of Nevada Power is held by its parent company, NV Energy, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Nevada Power declared and paid dividends to NV Energy of $— million in 2022 and $213 million in 2021.

SIERRA PACIFIC

All common stock of Sierra Pacific is held by its parent company, NV Energy, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Sierra Pacific declared and paid dividends to NV Energy of $70 million in 2022 and $— million in 2021.

EASTERN ENERGY GAS

Eastern Energy Gas is a Virginia limited liability corporation whose membership interest is held solely by its parent company, BHE GT&S, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. Eastern Energy Gas declared and paid dividends to BHE GT&S of $— million in 2022 and 2021.

EGTS

All common stock of EGTS is held by its parent company, Eastern Energy Gas, which is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. EGTS declared and paid dividends to Eastern Energy Gas of $215 million in 2022 and $18 million in 2021.
85


Item 6.[Reserved]

Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy Company
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy Company
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries

86


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
MidAmerican Energy Company
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Balance Sheets
Statements of Operations
Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Financial Statements
MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Member's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholder's Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
87


Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section
88


Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of the Company during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Company's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The Company's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

The reportable segment financial information includes all necessary adjustments and eliminations needed to conform to the Company's significant accounting policies. The differences between the reportable segment amounts and the consolidated amounts, described as BHE and Other, relate principally to other entities, including MES, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

Results of Operations

Overview

Operating revenue and earnings on common shares for the Company's reportable segments for the years ended December 31 are summarized as follows (in millions):

20222021Change20212020Change
Operating revenue:
PacifiCorp$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
MidAmerican Funding4,025 3,547 478 13 3,547 2,728 819 30 
NV Energy3,824 3,107 717 23 3,107 2,854 253 
Northern Powergrid1,365 1,188 177 15 1,188 1,022 166 16 
BHE Pipeline Group3,844 3,544 300 3,544 1,578 1,966 *
BHE Transmission732 731 — 731 659 72 11 
BHE Renewables994 981 13 981 936 45 
HomeServices5,268 6,215 (947)(15)6,215 5,396 819 15 
BHE and Other606 541 65 12 541 438 103 24 
Total operating revenue$26,337 $25,150 $1,187 %$25,150 $20,952 $4,198 20 %
Earnings on common shares:
PacifiCorp$921 $889 $32 %$889 $741 $148 20 %
MidAmerican Funding947 883 64 883 818 65 
NV Energy427 439 (12)(3)439 410 29 
Northern Powergrid385 247 138 56 247 201 46 23 
BHE Pipeline Group1,040 807 233 29 807 528 279 53 
BHE Transmission247 247 — — 247 231 16 
BHE Renewables(1)
625 451 174 39 451 521 (70)(13)
HomeServices100 387 (287)(74)387 375 12 
BHE and Other(2,017)1,319 (3,336)*1,319 3,092 (1,773)(57)
Total earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $(2,994)(53)%$5,669 $6,917 $(1,248)(18)%

(1)Includes the tax attributes of disregarded entities that are not required to pay income taxes and the earnings of which are taxable directly to BHE.

*    Not meaningful.

Earnings on common shares decreased $2,994 million for 2022 compared to 2021. Included in these results was a pre-tax loss in 2022 of $1,950 million ($1,540 million after-tax) compared to a pre-tax gain in 2021 of $1,796 million ($1,777 million after-tax) related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited. Excluding the impact of this item, adjusted earnings on common shares in 2022 was $4,215 million, an increase of $323 million, or 8%, compared to adjusted earnings on common shares in 2021 of $3,892 million.
89



The decrease in net income attributable to BHE shareholders for 2022 compared to 2021 was primarily due to:
The Utilities' earnings increased $84 million reflecting higher electric utility margin and favorable income tax expense, primarily from higher PTCs recognized of $157 million, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance expense and higher depreciation and amortization expense. Electric retail customer volumes increased 2.4% for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher customer usage, an increase in the average number of customers and the favorable impact of weather;
Northern Powergrid's earnings increased $138 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a deferred income tax charge of $109 million related to a June 2021 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023 and favorable earnings from new gas and solar projects, partially offset by $41 million from the stronger U.S. dollar;
BHE Pipeline Group's earnings increased $233 million due to higher earnings at BHE GT&S from the impacts of the EGTS general rate case, favorable income tax adjustments, lower operations and maintenance expense and higher margin from non-regulated activities;
BHE Renewables' earnings increased $174 million, primarily due to higher operating revenue from owned renewable energy projects and higher earnings from tax equity investments, mainly due to the unfavorable impacts from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event;
HomeServices' earnings decreased $287 million, reflecting lower earnings from brokerage and settlement services largely attributable to a decrease in closed units at existing companies and lower earnings from mortgage services mainly from a decrease in funded volumes; and
BHE and Other's earnings decreased $3,336 million, primarily due to the $3,317 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited.
Earnings on common shares decreased $1,248 million for 2021 compared to 2020. Included in these results was a pre-tax gain in 2021 of $1,796 million ($1,777 million after-tax) compared to a pre-tax gain in 2020 of $4,774 million ($3,470 million after-tax) related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited. Excluding the impact of this item, adjusted earnings on common shares in 2021 was $3,892 million, an increase of $445 million, or 13%, compared to adjusted earnings on common shares in 2020 of $3,447 million.

The decrease in net income attributable to BHE shareholders for 2021 compared to 2020 was primarily due to:
The Utilities' earnings increased $242 million reflecting higher electric utility margin, favorable income tax expense, from higher PTCs recognized of $139 million and the impacts of ratemaking, and lower operations and maintenance expense, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense. Electric retail customer volumes increased 3.8% for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher customer usage, an increase in the average number of customers and the favorable impact of weather;
Northern Powergrid's earnings increased $46 million, primarily due to higher distribution performance, lower write-offs of gas exploration costs and $16 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, partially offset by the comparative unfavorable impact of deferred income tax charges ($109 million in second quarter 2021 and $35 million in third quarter 2020) related to enacted increases in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate;
BHE Pipeline Group's earnings increased $279 million, primarily due to $244 million of incremental earnings at BHE GT&S;
BHE Renewables' earnings decreased $70 million, primarily due to lower tax equity investment earnings from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, partially offset by earnings from tax equity investment projects reaching commercial operation and higher operating performance from owned renewable energy projects; and
BHE and Other's earnings decreased $1,773 million, primarily due to the $1,693 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited and $95 million of higher dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued in October 2020, partially offset by favorable comparative consolidated state income tax benefits.

90


Reportable Segment Results

PacifiCorp

Operating revenue increased $383 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher retail revenue of $263 million and higher wholesale and other revenue of $120 million, largely from higher average wholesale prices. Retail revenue increased primarily due to price impacts of $166 million from higher average retail rates largely due to product mix and tariff changes and $97 million from higher retail volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.6%, primarily due to the favorable impact of weather and an increase in the average number of customers, partially offset by lower customer usage.

Earnings increased $32 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher utility margin of $235 million and higher allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction of $28 million, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance expense of $196 million, higher depreciation and amortization expense of $32 million, mainly from additional assets placed in-service, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and an unfavorable income tax benefit. Utility margin increased primarily due to favorable deferred net power costs, higher retail rates and volumes and higher average wholesale prices, partially offset by higher purchased power and thermal generation costs. Operations and maintenance expense increased mainly due to an increase in loss accruals and other costs associated with the September 2020 wildfires, net of estimated insurance recoveries, and higher general and plant maintenance costs. The unfavorable income tax benefit was largely due to state income tax impacts, partially offset by higher PTCs recognized of $21 million.

Operating revenue decreased $45 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower retail revenue of $98 million, partially offset by higher wholesale and other revenue of $53 million. Retail revenue decreased mainly due to $234 million from the Utah and Oregon general rate case orders issued in 2020 (fully offset in expense, primarily depreciation) and price impacts of $41 million from lower rates primarily due to certain general rate case orders, partially offset by higher customer volumes of $177 million. Retail customer volumes increased 3.1%, primarily due to higher customer usage, an increase in the average number of customers and the favorable impact of weather. Wholesale and other revenue increased mainly due to higher wheeling revenue, average wholesale prices and REC sales, partially offset by $34 million from the Oregon RAC settlement (fully offset in depreciation expense) recognized in 2020.

Earnings increased $148 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to favorable income tax expense from higher PTCs recognized of $75 million from new wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service, and the impacts of ratemaking, lower operations and maintenance expense of $178 million and higher utility margin of $145 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $255 million and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction of $72 million. Operations and maintenance expense decreased primarily due to lower costs associated with wildfires and the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement and lower thermal plant maintenance expense, partially offset by higher costs associated with additional wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service as well as higher distribution maintenance costs. Utility margin increased primarily due to the higher retail customer volumes, higher wheeling and wholesale revenue and higher deferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms, partially offset by higher purchased power and thermal generation costs, the price impacts from lower retail rates and higher wheeling expenses. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to the impacts of a depreciation study effective January 1, 2021, as well as additional assets placed in-service.

MidAmerican Funding

Operating revenue increased $478 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $459 million and higher natural gas operating revenue of $27 million. Electric operating revenue increased due to higher wholesale and other revenue of $261 million and higher retail revenue of $198 million. Electric wholesale and other revenue increased mainly due to higher average wholesale per-unit prices of $229 million and higher wholesale volumes of $36 million. Electric retail revenue increased primarily due to higher recoveries through adjustment clauses of $134 million (fully offset in expense, primarily cost of sales) and higher customer volumes of $62 million. Electric retail customer volumes increased 4.3%, primarily due to higher customer usage and the favorable impact of weather. Natural gas operating revenue increased due to higher customer usage of $9 million, the favorable impact of weather of $9 million and the impacts of tax reform of $5 million.

91


Earnings increased $64 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric utility margin of $319 million, a favorable income tax benefit and higher natural gas utility margin of $25 million, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $254 million, higher operations and maintenance expense of $53 million, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and higher non-service benefit plan costs of $17 million. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to higher wholesale and retail revenues, partially offset by higher purchased power and thermal generation costs. The favorable income tax benefit was mainly due to higher PTCs recognized of $136 million, partially offset by state income tax impacts. Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily from the impacts of certain regulatory mechanisms and additional assets placed in-service. Operations and maintenance expense increased due to higher general and plant maintenance costs.

Operating revenue increased $819 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher natural gas operating revenue of $430 million and higher electric operating revenue of $390 million. Natural gas operating revenue increased due to a higher average per-unit cost of natural gas sold resulting in higher purchased gas adjustment recoveries of $440 million (fully offset in cost of sales), largely due to the February 2021 polar vortex weather event. Electric operating revenue increased due to higher retail revenue of $198 million and higher wholesale and other revenue of $192 million. Electric retail revenue increased primarily due to higher recoveries through adjustment clauses of $116 million (fully offset in expense, primarily cost of sales), higher customer volumes of $63 million and price impacts of $19 million from changes in sales mix. Electric retail customer volumes increased 5.8% due to increased usage of certain industrial customers and the favorable impact of weather. Electric wholesale and other revenue increased primarily due to higher average wholesale prices of $116 million and higher wholesale volumes of $71 million.

Earnings increased $65 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher electric utility margin of $190 million and a favorable income tax benefit, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense of $198 million, higher operations and maintenance expense of $20 million and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds of $8 million. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to the higher retail and wholesale revenues, partially offset by higher thermal generation and purchased power costs. The favorable income tax benefit was largely due to higher PTCs recognized of $64 million, from new wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service, partially offset by state income tax impacts. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was primarily due to the impacts of certain regulatory mechanisms and additional assets placed in-service. Operations and maintenance expense increased primarily due to higher costs associated with additional wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service and higher natural gas distribution costs, partially offset by 2020 costs associated with storm restoration activities.

NV Energy

Operating revenue increased $717 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $668 million and higher natural gas operating revenue of $51 million from a higher average per-unit cost of natural gas sold (fully offset in cost of sales). Electric operating revenue increased primarily due to higher fully-bundled energy rates (fully offset in cost of sales) of $636 million, higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals of $15 million and higher customer volumes of $6 million. Electric retail customer volumes increased 2.2%, primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of weather.

Earnings decreased $12 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher operations and maintenance expense of $24 million, higher depreciation and amortization expense of $17 million, higher interest expense of $15 million, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and higher non-service benefit plan costs of $11 million, partially offset by higher interest and dividend income of $36 million from carrying charges on regulatory balances and higher electric utility margin of $32 million. Operations and maintenance expense increased mainly due to higher general and plant maintenance costs and an unfavorable change in earnings sharing at the Nevada Utilities. Depreciation and amortization expense increased mainly from additional assets placed in-service. Electric utility margin increased mainly due to higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals of $15 million and higher electric retail customer volumes.

Operating revenue increased $253 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher electric operating revenue of $252 million. Electric operating revenue increased primarily due to higher fully-bundled energy rates (fully offset in cost of sales) of $229 million, a $120 million one-time bill credit in the fourth quarter of 2020 resulting from a regulatory rate review decision (fully offset in operations and maintenance and income tax expenses) and higher retail customer volumes of $10 million, partially offset by lower base tariff general rates of $71 million at Nevada Power and a favorable regulatory decision in 2020. Electric retail customer volumes increased 3.3%, primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, higher customer usage and the favorable impact of weather.

92


Earnings increased $29 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower operations and maintenance expense of $90 million, lower income tax expense mainly from the impacts of ratemaking, lower interest expense of $21 million, higher interest and dividend income of $16 million and lower pension expense of $10 million, partially offset by lower electric utility margin of $97 million and higher depreciation and amortization expense of $47 million. Operations and maintenance expense decreased primarily due to lower regulatory deferrals and amortizations and lower earnings sharing at the Nevada Utilities. Electric utility margin decreased primarily due to lower base tariff general rates at Nevada Power and a favorable regulatory decision in 2020, partially offset by higher retail customer volumes. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was mainly due to the regulatory amortization of decommissioning costs and additional assets placed in-service.

Northern Powergrid

Operating revenue increased $177 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher distribution revenue of $167 million and higher revenue of $158 million, due to a gas project that commenced commercial operation in March 2022 and a solar project that commenced commercial operation in July 2022, partially offset by $155 million from the stronger U.S. dollar. Distribution revenue increased primarily due to the recovery of Supplier of Last Resort payments of $135 million (fully offset in cost of sales) and higher tariff rates of $78 million, partially offset by a 4.6% decline in units distributed of $36 million.

Earnings increased $138 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a deferred income tax charge of $109 million related to a June 2021 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023, the higher distribution tariff rates and improved earnings of $47 million from the new gas and solar projects, partially offset by $41 million from the stronger U.S. dollar, the decline in units distributed and higher distribution-related operating and depreciation expenses of $25 million.

Operating revenue increased $166 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher distribution revenue of $80 million, mainly from increased tariff rates of $40 million and a 3.2% increase in units distributed totaling $26 million, and $77 million from the weaker U.S. dollar.

Earnings increased $46 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to the higher distribution revenue, lower write-offs of gas exploration costs of $36 million, $16 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, favorable pension expense of $14 million and lower interest expense of $8 million, partially offset by higher income tax expense and higher distribution-related operating and depreciation expenses of $29 million. Earnings in 2021 included a deferred income tax charge of $109 million related to a June 2021 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 19% to 25% effective April 1, 2023, while earnings in 2020 included a deferred income tax charge of $35 million related to a July 2020 enacted increase in the United Kingdom corporate income tax rate from 17% to 19% effective April 1, 2020.

BHE Pipeline Group

Operating revenue increased $300 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher operating revenue of $242 million at BHE GT&S and $47 million at Northern Natural Gas. The increase in operating revenue at BHE GT&S was primarily due to higher nonregulated revenue of $109 million (largely offset in cost of sales) from favorable commodity prices, an increase in regulated gas transportation and storage services rates due to the settlement of EGTS' general rate case of $101 million and higher LNG revenue of $56 million at Cove Point, largely from favorable variable revenue, partially offset by lower gas sales of $49 million at EGTS from operational and system balancing activities. The increase in operating revenue at Northern Natural Gas was mainly due to higher transportation revenue of $63 million offset by lower gas sales of $14 million from system balancing activities. The variances in transportation revenue and gas sales included favorable impacts recognized of $49 million and $77 million, respectively, from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event. Excluding this item, transportation revenue increased $112 million due to higher volumes and rates and gas sales increased $63 million (largely offset in cost of sales).

Earnings increased $233 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher earnings of $232 million at BHE GT&S. Earnings at BHE GT&S increased mainly due to the impacts of the EGTS general rate case of $124 million, favorable income tax adjustments, lower operations and maintenance and property and other tax expense of $30 million, higher margin of $26 million from nonregulated activities and increased earnings at Cove Point of $16 million.

93


Operating revenue increased $1,966 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $1,828 million of incremental revenue at BHE GT&S, acquired in November 2020, higher gas sales of $115 million ($38 million largely offset in costs of sales) at Northern Natural Gas and higher transportation revenue of $29 million at Kern River largely due to higher rates and volumes, partially offset by lower transportation revenue of $24 million at Northern Natural Gas primarily due to lower volumes. The variances in gas sales and transportation revenue at Northern Natural Gas included favorable impacts of $77 million and $49 million, respectively, from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event.

Earnings increased $279 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $244 million of incremental earnings at BHE GT&S, favorable earnings of $19 million at Kern River from the higher transportation revenue and higher earnings of $15 million at Northern Natural Gas, primarily due to higher gross margin on gas sales and higher transportation revenue, each due to the favorable impacts of the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, offset by the lower transportation revenue.

BHE Transmission

Operating revenue increased $1 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher nonregulated revenue from wind-powered generating facilities, partially offset by $27 million from the stronger U.S. dollar.

Earnings for 2022 were equal to 2021, primarily due to improved equity earnings from ETT offset by $7 million from the stronger U.S. dollar.

Operating revenue increased $72 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $47 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, a regulatory decision received in November 2020 at AltaLink and higher revenue from the Montana-Alberta Tie Line of $11 million.

Earnings increased $16 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $12 million from the weaker U.S. dollar, higher earnings from the Montana-Alberta Tie Line and lower nonregulated interest expense at BHE Canada, partially offset by the impact of a regulatory decision received in April 2020 at AltaLink.

BHE Renewables

Operating revenue increased $13 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher wind, geothermal, and solar revenues of $140 million from higher generation and pricing, partially offset by lower natural gas revenues of $72 million from lower generation and hedge losses, lower hydro revenues of $28 million due to the transfer of the Casecnan generating facility to the Philippine government in December 2021 and $27 million from unfavorable changes in the valuation of certain derivative contracts.

Earnings increased $174 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher wind earnings of $214 million, higher geothermal earnings of $16 million and higher solar earnings of $14 million, partially offset by lower natural gas earnings of $44 million and lower hydro earnings of $18 million due to the Casecnan generating facility transfer. Wind earnings increased due to higher earnings from tax equity investments of $153 million, largely as a result of the unfavorable impacts recognized in 2021 from the February 2021 polar vortex weather event and higher production tax credits, and higher earnings from owned projects of $61 million.

Operating revenue increased $45 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher natural gas, solar, wind and hydro revenues from favorable market conditions and higher generation, partially offset by an unfavorable change in the valuation of a power purchase agreement of $30 million.

Earnings decreased $70 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower wind earnings of $83 million, largely from lower tax equity investment earnings of $90 million, and lower hydro earnings of $10 million, mainly due to lower income from a declining financial asset balance, partially offset by higher solar earnings of $22 million, mainly due to the higher operating revenue and lower depreciation expense. Tax equity investment earnings decreased due to unfavorable results from existing tax equity investments of $165 million, primarily due to the February 2021 polar vortex weather event, and lower commitment fee income, partially offset by $87 million of earnings from projects reaching commercial operation.

94


HomeServices

Operating revenue decreased $947 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower brokerage and settlement services revenue of $637 million and lower mortgage revenue of $305 million. The decrease in brokerage and settlement services revenue resulted from an 11% decrease in closed transaction volume driven by 23% fewer closed units at existing companies resulting from rising interest rates and a corresponding slowdown in home sales offset by acquisitions and a 7% increase in average sales price. The lower mortgage revenue was due to a 40% decrease in funded volume, primarily due to a decline in refinance activity resulting from rising interest rates.

Earnings decreased $287 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower earnings from brokerage and settlement services of $142 million and mortgage services of $126 million, largely from the decrease in funded volumes from rising interest rates. Earnings at brokerage and settlement services declined due to the decrease in closed units at existing companies, partially offset by favorable operating expense variances.

Operating revenue increased $819 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher brokerage revenue of $951 million, partially offset by lower mortgage revenue of $169 million from an 8% decrease in funded volume due to a decrease in refinance activity. The increase in brokerage revenue was due to a 21% increase in closed transaction volume at existing companies resulting from increases in average sales price and closed units.

Earnings increased $12 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher earnings from brokerage and franchise services of $81 million, largely attributable to the increase in closed transaction volume at existing companies, partially offset by lower earnings from mortgage services of $68 million from the decrease in refinance activity.

BHE and Other

Operating revenue increased $65 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to higher electric and natural gas sales revenue at MES, from favorable electric volumes and natural gas pricing, including changes in unrealized positions on derivative contracts, offset by lower electric pricing and natural gas volumes.

Earnings decreased $3,336 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to the $3,317 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited, unfavorable comparative consolidated state income tax benefits, higher BHE corporate interest expense from an April 2022 debt issuance and unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies, partially offset by $75 million of lower dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway and lower corporate costs.

Operating revenue increased $103 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher electricity and natural gas sales revenue at MES, from favorable pricing offset by lower volumes.

Earnings decreased $1,773 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to the $1,693 million unfavorable comparative change related to the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited, $95 million of higher dividends on BHE's 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock issued in October 2020 to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway, higher corporate costs and higher BHE corporate interest expense from debt issuances in March and October 2020, partially offset by favorable comparative consolidated state income tax benefits and higher earnings of $17 million at MES.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Each of BHE's direct and indirect subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity separate and apart from BHE and its other subsidiaries. It should not be assumed that the assets of any subsidiary will be available to satisfy BHE's obligations or the obligations of its other subsidiaries. However, unrestricted cash or other assets that are available for distribution may, subject to applicable law, regulatory commitments and the terms of financing and ring-fencing arrangements for such parties, be advanced, loaned, paid as dividends or otherwise distributed or contributed to BHE or affiliates thereof. The Company's long-term debt may include provisions that allow BHE or its subsidiaries to redeem such debt in whole or in part at any time. These provisions generally include make-whole premiums. Refer to Note 18 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding the limitation of distributions from BHE's subsidiaries.

95


As of December 31, 2022, the Company's total net liquidity was as follows (in millions):
BHE Pipeline
MidAmericanNVNorthernBHEGroup and
 BHEPacifiCorpFundingEnergyPowergridCanadaHomeServicesOtherTotal
 
Cash and cash equivalents$32$641$261$108$37$56$239 $217$1,591 
   
Credit facilities(1)
3,5001,2001,5096502967932,925 10,873 
Less: 
Short-term debt(245)(120)(197)(557)(1,119)
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(249)(370)(1)— (620)
Net credit facilities3,2559511,1396501765952,368 9,134 
Total net liquidity$3,287$1,592$1,400$758$213$651$2,607 $217$10,725 
Credit facilities:      
Maturity dates202520252023, 202520252025, 20262023, 2026, 20272023, 2026 

(1)    Includes $55 million drawn on capital expenditure and other uncommitted credit facilities at Northern Powergrid.

Refer to Note 9 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding the Company's credit facilities, letters of credit, equity commitments and other related items.

Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $9.4 billion and $8.7 billion, respectively. The increase was primarily due to an increase in income tax receipts and improved operating results, partially offset by changes in regulatory assets and working capital.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $8.7 billion and $6.2 billion, respectively. The increase was primarily due to $970 million of incremental net cash flows from operating activities at BHE GT&S, improved operating results and changes in working capital.

The timing of the Company's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $(7.8) billion and $(5.8) billion, respectively. The change was primarily due to the July 2021 receipt of $1.3 billion due to the termination of the second Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement" with Dominion Questar, higher capital expenditures of $894 million and higher cash paid for acquisitions, partially offset by lower funding of tax equity investments. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $(5.8) billion and $(13.2) billion, respectively. The change was primarily due to lower funding of tax equity investments, lower cash paid for acquisitions and the July 2021 receipt of $1.3 billion due to the termination of the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.

96


Natural Gas Transmission and Storage Business Acquisition

On November 1, 2020, BHE completed its acquisition of substantially all of the natural gas transmission and storage business of DEI and Dominion Questar, exclusive of the Questar Pipeline Group. Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated July 3, 2020, BHE paid approximately $2.5 billion in cash, after post-closing adjustments (the "GT&S Cash Consideration").

On October 5, 2020, BHE entered into the "Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement") with Dominion Questar providing for BHE's purchase of the Questar Pipeline Group from Dominion Questar after receipt of HSR Approval for a cash purchase price of approximately $1.3 billion (the "Q-Pipe Cash Consideration"), subject to adjustment for cash and indebtedness as of the closing. Under the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement, BHE delivered the Q-Pipe Cash Consideration of approximately $1.3 billion to Dominion Questar on November 2, 2020.

On July 9, 2021, Dominion Questar and DEI delivered a written notice to BHE stating that BHE and Dominion Questar have mutually elected to terminate the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement. On July 14, 2021, BHE received the Purchase Price Repayment Amount of approximately $1.3 billion in cash.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $(1.0) billion. Sources of cash totaled $3.9 billion and consisted of proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances of $2.9 billion and proceeds from BHE senior debt issuances of $1.0 billion. Uses of cash totaled $4.9 billion and consisted mainly of repayments of subsidiary debt totaling $1.5 billion, purchases of common stock of $870 million, net repayments of short-term debt totaling $867 million, preferred stock redemptions totaling $800 million and distributions to noncontrolling interests of $524 million.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $(3.1) billion. Sources of cash totaled $2.4 billion and consisted of proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances. Uses of cash totaled $5.5 billion and consisted mainly of preferred stock redemptions totaling $2.1 billion, repayments of subsidiary debt totaling $2.0 billion, distributions to noncontrolling interests of $488 million, repayments of BHE senior debt totaling $450 million and net repayments of short-term debt totaling $276 million.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $7.1 billion. Sources of cash totaled $11.7 billion and consisted of proceeds from BHE senior debt issuances of $5.2 billion, proceeds from preferred stock issuances of $3.8 billion and proceeds from subsidiary debt issuances totaling $2.7 billion. Uses of cash totaled $4.5 billion and consisted mainly of $2.8 billion for repayments of subsidiary debt, net repayments of short-term debt of $939 million and $350 million for repayments of BHE senior debt.

Debt Repurchases

The Company may from time to time seek to acquire its outstanding debt securities through cash purchases in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Any debt securities repurchased by the Company may be reissued or resold by the Company from time to time and will depend on prevailing market conditions, the Company's liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Preferred Stock Issuance

On October 29, 2020, BHE issued $3.75 billion of its 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. in order to fund the GT&S Cash Consideration and the Q-Pipe Cash Consideration.

Preferred Stock Redemptions

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, BHE redeemed at par 800,006 and 2,100,012 shares of its 4.00% Perpetual Preferred Stock from certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. for $800 million and $2.1 billion.

97


Common Stock Transactions

For the year ended December 31, 2022, BHE purchased 740,961 shares of its common stock held by Mr. Gregory E. Abel, BHE's Chair, for $870 million. The purchase was pursuant to the terms of BHE's Shareholders Agreement.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, BHE repurchased 180,358 shares of its common stock for $126 million.

There were no common stock repurchases for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Future Uses of Cash

The Company has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the issuance of commercial paper, the use of unsecured revolving credit facilities, the issuance of equity and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which BHE and each subsidiary has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including regulatory approvals, its credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry and project finance markets, among other items.

Capital Expenditures

The Company has significant future capital requirements. Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, impacts to customers' rates; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisitions of existing assets.

The Company's historical and forecast capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, by reportable segment for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
PacifiCorp$2,540 $1,513 $2,166 $3,579 $3,069 $3,986 
MidAmerican Funding1,836 1,912 1,869 2,451 2,149 1,791 
NV Energy675 749 1,113 1,614 1,729 1,622 
Northern Powergrid682 742 768 569 632 659 
BHE Pipeline Group659 1,128 1,157 1,001 855 926 
BHE Transmission372 279 200 203 300 433 
BHE Renewables95 225 138 251 399 316 
HomeServices36 42 48 54 57 57 
BHE and Other(1)
(130)21 46 — 
Total$6,765 $6,611 $7,505 $9,726 $9,192 $9,790 
(1)BHE and Other includes intersegment eliminations.

98


HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Wind generation$2,125 $1,339 $774 $2,201 $1,710 $1,197 
Electric distribution1,705 1,679 1,806 1,860 1,732 2,337 
Electric transmission968 823 1,725 1,973 2,154 2,837 
Natural gas transmission and storage6401,068945 824 617 843 
Solar generation16157422 248 630 450 
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage— 23 16 317 392 575 
Other1,311 1,522 1,817 2,303 1,957 1,551 
Total$6,765 $6,611 $7,505 $9,726 $9,192 $9,790 

The Company's historical and forecast capital expenditures consisted mainly of the following:
Wind generation includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for the following:
Construction and acquisition of wind-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy totaling $72 million for 2022, $540 million for 2021 and $848 million for 2020. MidAmerican Energy placed in-service 294 MWs during 2021 and 729 MWs during 2020. All of these wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in 2021 and 2020 qualify for 100% of PTCs available. PTCs from these projects are excluded from MidAmerican Energy's Iowa EAC until these generation assets are reflected in base rates. Planned spending for the construction of wind-powered generating facilities totals $1,232 million in 2023, $1,032 million in 2024 and $740 million in 2025.
Repowering of wind-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy totaling $500 million for 2022, $354 million for 2021 and $37 million for 2020. Planned spending for repowering totals $20 million in 2023, $179 million in 2024 and $84 million in 2025. MidAmerican Energy expects its repowered facilities to meet IRS guidelines for the re-establishment of PTCs for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service.
Construction of new wind-powered generating facilities and construction at existing wind-powered generating facility sites acquired from third parties at PacifiCorp totaling $23 million for 2022, $118 million for 2021 and $1,148 million for 2020. PacifiCorp placed in-service 516 MWs of new wind-powered generating facilities in 2021 and 674 MWs in 2020. Planned spending for the construction of additional new wind-powered generating facilities and those at acquired sites totals $771 million in 2023, $385 million in 2024 and $251 million in 2025 and is primarily for projects totaling approximately 683 MWs that are expected to be placed in-service in 2023 through 2025.
Construction of wind-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables totaling $155 million for 2021. In May 2021, BHE Renewables completed the asset acquisition of a 54-MW wind-powered generating facility located in Iowa. In December 2021, BHE Renewables completed asset acquisitions of 158-MW and 200-MW wind-powered generating facilities located in Texas.
Repowering of wind-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables totaling $45 million for 2022. Planned spending for repowering totals $50 million in 2023.
Electric distribution includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for new customer connections and enhancements to existing customer connections. Operating expenditures include spending for ongoing distribution systems infrastructure needed at the Utilities and Northern Powergrid, wildfire mitigation, storm damage restoration and repairs and investments in routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
99


Electric transmission includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include spending for the following:
PacifiCorp's transmission investment primarily reflects planned costs for the following Energy Gateway Transmission segments: the 416-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Aeolus substation near Medicine Bow, Wyoming and the Clover substation near Mona, Utah; the 59-mile, 230-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Windstar substation near Glenrock, Wyoming and the Aeolus substation; the 290-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line from the Longhorn substation near Boardman, Oregon to the Hemingway substation near Boise, Idaho; the 14-mile, 345-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Oquirrh substation in the Salt Lake Valley and the Terminal substation near the Salt Lake City Airport; the 40-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Limber substation in central Utah and the Terminal substation; and the195-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Anticline substation near Point of Rocks, Wyoming and the Populus substation in Downey, Idaho. Planned spending for these Energy Gateway Transmission segments that are expected to be placed in-service in 2024 through 2028 totals $1,005 million in 2023, $661 million in 2024 and $763 million in 2025.
Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Planned spending for the expansion programs estimated to be placed in-service in 2026-2028 totals $46 million in 2023, $380 million in 2024 and $502 million in 2025.
Operating expenditures include spending for system reinforcement, upgrades and replacements of facilities to maintain system reliability and investments in routine expenditures for transmission needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Natural gas transmission and storage includes both growth and operating expenditures. Growth expenditures include, among other items, spending for asset modernization and the Northern Natural Gas Twin Cities Area Expansion and Spraberry Compression projects. Operating expenditures include, among other items, spending for pipeline integrity projects, automation and controls upgrades, corrosion control, unit exchanges, compressor modifications, projects related to Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration natural gas storage rules and natural gas transmission, storage and LNG terminalling infrastructure needs to serve existing and expected demand.
Solar generation includes growth expenditures, including spending for the following:
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at PacifiCorp totaling 377 MWs of new generation and are expected to be placed in-service in 2026. Planned spending totals $381 million from 2023 through 2025.
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at MidAmerican Energy totaling 141 MWs of small- and utility-scale solar generation, all of which were placed in-service in 2022, with total spend of $119 million in 2022 and $132 million in 2021.
Construction of solar-powered generating facility at the Nevada Utilities includes expenditures for a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada, with commercial operation expected by the end of 2023.
Construction of solar-powered generating facilities at BHE Renewables' includes expenditures for a 48-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 52 MWs of capacity of co-located battery storage in Kern County, California, with commercial operation expected by November 30, 2024. Planned spending totals $174 million in 2024.
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage includes growth expenditures, including spending for the following:
Construction of 38 MWs of new pumped hydro storage on the North Umpqua River system expected to be placed in-service in 2024 and 2026 as well as other battery storage projects providing approximately 419 MWs of storage that are expected to be placed in-service in 2026 at PacifiCorp. Planned spending for these project totals $398 million from 2023 through 2025. Planned spending for other pumped hydro storage projects that are expected to be placed in-service beyond 2026 totals $95 million from 2023 through 2025
100


Construction at the Nevada Utilities of a 100-MW battery energy storage system co-located with a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada and a 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada, both with commercial operation expected by the end of 2023. Also, a 200-MW battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the Valmy generating station in Humboldt County, Nevada with commercial operation expected by the end of 2025.
Other capital expenditures includes both growth and operating expenditures, including spending for routine expenditures for generation and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand, natural gas distribution, technology, and environmental spending relating to emissions control equipment and the management of CCR.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has certain investments that are accounted for under the equity method in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, an amount is recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets as an equity investment and is increased or decreased for the Company's pro-rata share of earnings or losses, respectively, less any dividends from such investments. Certain equity investments are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of investment tax credits.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company's investments that are accounted for under the equity method had short- and long-term debt of $2.7 billion, unused revolving credit facilities of $122 million and letters of credit outstanding of $88 million. As of December 31, 2022, the Company's pro-rata share of such short- and long-term debt was $1.3 billion, unused revolving credit facilities was $61 million and outstanding letters of credit was $43 million. The entire amount of the Company's pro-rata share of the outstanding short- and long-term debt and unused revolving credit facilities is non-recourse to the Company. The entire amount of the Company's pro-rata share of the outstanding letters of credit is recourse to the Company. Although the Company is generally not required to support debt service obligations of its equity investees, default with respect to this non-recourse short- and long-term debt could result in a loss of invested equity.

Material Cash Requirements
The Company has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise primarily from long- and short-term debt (refer to Note 9, 10 and 11), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 6), firm commitments (refer to Note 16), letters of credit (refer to Note 9), construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7), uncertain tax positions (refer to Note 12) and AROs (refer to Note 14). Refer, where applicable, to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

The Company has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $35.1 billion on long-term debt, including $2.2 billion due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters

The Company is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding the Company's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

Quad Cities Generating Station Operating Status

Constellation Energy Generation, LLC ("Constellation Energy"), the operator of Quad Cities Generating Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station") of which MidAmerican Energy has a C$75025% ownership interest, receives financial support for continued operation of Quad Cities Station from the zero emission standard enacted by the Illinois legislature in December 2016. The zero emission standard requires the Illinois Power Agency to purchase ZECs and recover the costs from certain ratepayers in Illinois, subject to certain limitations. The proceeds from the ZECs provide Constellation Energy additional revenue through 2027 as an incentive for continued operation of Quad Cities Station. MidAmerican Energy does not receive additional revenue from the subsidy.

101


The PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ("PJM") capacity market includes a Minimum Offer Price Rule ("MOPR"). If a generation resource is subjected to a MOPR, its offer price in the market is adjusted to effectively remove the revenues it receives through a state government-provided financial support program like the Illinois zero emission standard, resulting in a higher offer that may not clear the capacity market. Prior to December 19, 2019, the PJM MOPR applied only to certain new gas-fueled resources.

On December 19, 2019, the FERC issued an order requiring the PJM to broadly apply the MOPR to all new and existing resources, including nuclear. This greatly expanded the breadth and scope of the PJM's MOPR, which became effective as of the PJM's capacity auction for the 2022-2023 planning year. While the FERC included some limited exemptions, no exemptions were available to state-supported nuclear resources, such as Quad Cities Station. The FERC denied rehearing of that order on April 16, 2020. A number of parties, including Constellation Energy, have filed petitions for review of the FERC's orders in this proceeding, which remain pending before the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. MidAmerican Energy cannot predict the outcome of this proceeding.

While this litigation is pending, the MOPR applied to Quad Cities Station in the capacity auction for the 2022-2023 planning year in May 2021, which prevented Quad Cities Station from clearing in that capacity auction.

At the direction of the PJM Board of Managers, the PJM and its stakeholders developed further MOPR reforms to ensure that the capacity market rules respect and accommodate state resource preferences such as the ZEC programs. The PJM filed related tariff revisions with the FERC on July 30, 2021, and, on September 29, 2021, the PJM's proposed MOPR reforms became effective by operation of law. Under the new tariff provisions, the MOPR applied in the capacity auction for the 2023-2024 delivery year but did not restrict the offers of Quad Cities Station, which cleared in the capacity auction. Requests for rehearing of the FERC's notice establishing the effective date for the PJM's proposed market reforms were filed in October 2021 and denied by operation of law on November 4, 2021. Several parties have filed petitions for review of the FERC's orders in this proceeding, which remain pending before the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Assuming the continued effectiveness of the Illinois zero emission standard, Constellation Energy no longer considers Quad Cities Station to be at heightened risk for early retirement. However, to the extent the Illinois zero emission standard does not operate as expected over its full term, Quad Cities Station would be at heightened risk for early retirement. The FERC provided no new mechanism for accommodating state-supported resources like Quad Cities Station other than the existing Fixed Resource Requirement ("FRR") mechanism under which an entire utility zone would be removed from PJM's capacity auction along with sufficient resources to support the load in such zone. Depending on the outcome of the proceedings related to the PJM MOPR, the continued effectiveness of the Illinois zero emission standard may be undermined unless the PJM adopts further changes to the MOPR or Illinois implements an FRR mechanism, under which Quad Cities Station would be removed from the PJM's capacity auction.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

The Company is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state, local and international agencies. The Company believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and the Company is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt of BHE and debt and preferred securities of certain of its subsidiaries are rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of the rated company's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt or preferred securities. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.

102


BHE and its subsidiaries have no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. The Company's unsecured revolving credit facilities do not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon their availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facilities are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, the applicable entities' credit ratings from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2022, the Company would have been required to post $704 million of additional collateral. The Company's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors.

Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where BHE's subsidiaries operate have not had a significant impact on the Company's consolidated financial results. In the U.S. and Canada, the Regulated Businesses operate under cost-of-service based rate-setting structures administered by various state and provincial commissions and the FERC. Under these rate-setting structures, the Regulated Businesses are allowed to include prudent costs in their rates, including the impact of inflation. The price control formula used by the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies incorporates the rate of inflation in determining rates charged to customers. BHE's subsidiaries attempt to minimize the potential impact of inflation on their operations through the use of fuel, energy and other cost adjustment clauses and bill riders, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by the Company's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with the Company's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

The Regulated Businesses prepare their financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, the Regulated Businesses defer the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

103


The Company continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit the Regulated Businesses' ability to recover their costs. The Company believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at the federal, state and provincial levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $5.1 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $7.4 billion as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Regulated Businesses' regulatory assets and liabilities.

Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

The Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022 includes goodwill of acquired businesses of $11.5 billion. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31, 2022. Additionally, no indicators of impairment were identified as of December 31, 2022. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. The Company uses a variety of methods to estimate a reporting unit's fair value, principally discounted projected future net cash flows. Key assumptions used include, but are not limited to, the use of estimated future cash flows; multiples of earnings or rate base; and an appropriate discount rate. Estimated future cash flows are impacted by, among other factors, growth rates, changes in regulations and rates, ability to renew contracts and estimates of future commodity prices. In estimating future cash flows, the Company incorporates current market information, as well as historical factors.

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a majority of all property, plant and equipment is used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the purposes of impairment analysis, requires the exercise of judgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of fair value or the recoverable amount of an asset may include significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect the Company's results of operations.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

Certain of the Company's subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans that cover the majority of employees. The Company recognizes the funded status of the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Funded status is the fair value of plan assets minus the benefit obligation as of the measurement date. As of December 31, 2022, the Company recognized a net asset totaling $206 million for the funded status of the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As of December 31, 2022, amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that were included in net regulatory assets totaled $376 million and in AOCI totaled $527 million.

The expense and benefit obligations relating to these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are based on actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and healthcare cost trend rates. These key assumptions are reviewed annually and modified as appropriate. The Company believes that the key assumptions utilized in recording obligations under the plans are reasonable based on prior plan experience and current market and economic conditions. Refer to Note 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosures about the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the key assumptions used to calculate the funded status and net periodic benefit cost for these plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022.

104


The Company chooses a discount rate based upon high quality debt security investment yields in effect as of the measurement date that corresponds to the expected benefit period. The pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities increase as the discount rate is reduced.

In establishing its assumption as to the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company utilizes the expected asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets. Pension and other postretirement benefits expense increases as the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets decreases. The Company regularly reviews its actual asset allocations and rebalances its investments to its targeted allocations when considered appropriate.

The Company chooses a healthcare cost trend rate that reflects the near and long-term expectations of increases in medical costs and corresponds to the expected benefit payment periods. The healthcare cost trend rate is assumed to gradually decline to 5.00% by 2028, at which point the rate of increase is assumed to remain constant.

The key assumptions used may differ materially from period to period due to changing market and economic conditions. These differences may result in a significant impact to pension and other postretirement benefits expense and funded status. If changes were to occur for the following key assumptions, the approximate effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements would be as follows (dollars in millions):
Domestic Plans
Other PostretirementUnited Kingdom
Pension PlansBenefit PlansPension Plan
+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%
Effect on December 31, 2022
Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate$(76)$82 $(21)$23 $(75)$86 
Effect on 2022 Periodic Cost:
Discount rate$$(3)$$(1)$(4)$
Expected rate of return on plan assets(13)13 (4)(7)

A variety of factors affect the funded status of the plans, including asset returns, discount rates, mortality assumptions, plan changes and the Company's funding policy for each plan.

Income Taxes

In determining the Company's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by the Company's various regulatory commissions. The Company's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state, local and foreign income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of the Company's federal, state, local and foreign income tax examinations is uncertain, the Company believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial results. Refer to Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Company's income taxes.

It is probable the Company's regulated businesses will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to their customers. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $2.5 billion and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

105


The Company has not established deferred income taxes on its undistributed foreign earnings that have been determined by management to be reinvested indefinitely; however, the Company periodically evaluates its capital requirements. If circumstances change in the future and a portion of the Company's undistributed foreign earnings were repatriated, the dividends may be subject to taxation in the U.S. but the tax is not expected to be material.

Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue

Revenue recognized is equal to what the Company has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. The determination of customer invoices is based on a systematic reading of meters, fixed reservation charges based on contractual quantities and rates or, in the case of the Great Britain distribution businesses, when information is received from the national settlement system. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $828 million as of December 31, 2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Unbilled revenue is reversed in the following month and billed revenue is recorded based on the subsequent meter readings.

Wildfire Loss Contingencies

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in the Company's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, the Company is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the wildfires. In determining this exposure, the Company is required to assess whether the likelihood of loss for each of the wildfires and lawsuits is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with various parties. If deemed reasonably possible, the Company is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts. If deemed probable, the Company is required to accrue a loss if reasonably estimable based on the bottom end of the range if no amount within the range of estimated loss is any better than another amount. Many assumptions and variables are involved in determining these estimates, including identifying the various categories of potential loss such as fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. Within the categories of potential loss, further assumptions are made regarding items such as the types of structures damaged, estimated replacement values associated with those structures, value of personal property, the types of natural resource damage such as timber, the value of that timber, the nature of noneconomic damages such as those arising from personal injuries, other damages the Company may be responsible for if found negligent such as punitive damages, and the amount of any penalties or fines that may be imposed by governmental entities. Refer to Note 16 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding the Company's loss contingencies associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney fire.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. The Company's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates, equity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which the Company transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with the Company's business activities. Each of the Company's business platforms has established guidelines for credit risk management.

106


Commodity Price Risk

The Company is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk primarily through BHE's ownership of the Utilities as they have an obligation to serve retail customer load in their regulated service territories. The Company also provides nonregulated retail electricity and natural gas services in competitive markets. The Utilities' load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage and transmission and transportation constraints. The Company does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities. To manage a portion of its commodity price risk, the Company uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. The Company does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. The Company's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates, which is subject to regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.

The table that follows summarizes the Company's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives, excluding collateral netting of $(88) million and $26 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices with the contracted or expected volumes. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions).
Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts$335 $520 $150 
Designated as hedging contracts12 40 (16)
Total commodity derivative contracts$347 $560 $134 
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts$20 $116 $(76)
Designated as hedging contracts(10)(5)(15)
Total commodity derivative contracts$10 $111 $(91)

The settled cost of certain of the Company's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts is included in regulated rates and, therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose the Company to earnings volatility. Consolidated financial results would be negatively impacted if the costs of wholesale electricity, wholesale natural gas or fuel are higher than what is included in regulated rates, including the impacts of adjustment mechanisms. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a net regulatory liability of $231 million and a net regulatory asset of $71 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative asset of $335 million and $20 million, respectively. For the Company's commodity derivative contracts designated as hedging contracts, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts, to the extent the hedge is considered effective, generally do not expose the Company to earnings volatility.

107


Interest Rate Risk

The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt, future debt issuances and mortgage commitments. The Company manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, the Company's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose the Company to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if the Company were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of the Company's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 9, 10, 11, and 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of the Company's short and long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $3.2 billion and $3.7 billion, respectively, that expose the Company to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

The Company may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, forward sale commitments or mortgage interest rate lock commitments, to mitigate the Company's exposure to interest rate risk. Changes in fair value of agreements designated as cash flow hedges are reported in AOCI to the extent the hedge is effective until the forecasted transaction occurs. Changes in fair value of agreements not designated as hedging contracts are recognized in earnings. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps with notional amounts of $481 million and $533 million, respectively, and £272 million and £174 million, respectively, to protect the Company against an increase in interest rates. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company had mortgage commitments, net, with notional amounts of $438 million and $1,512 million, respectively, to protect the Company against an increase in interest rates. The fair value of the Company's interest rate derivative contracts was a net derivative asset of $108 million and $16 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. A hypothetical 10 basis point increase and a 10 basis point decrease in interest rates would not have a material impact on the Company.

The Company holds foreign currency swaps with the purpose of hedging the foreign currency exchange rate associated with Euro denominated debt. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had €250 million in aggregate notional amounts of these foreign currency swaps outstanding. A hypothetical 10% decrease in market interest rates would not have resulted in a material decrease in fair value of the Company's foreign currency swaps as of December 31.

Equity Price Risk

Market prices for equity securities are subject to fluctuation and consequently the amount realized in the subsequent sale of an investment may significantly differ from the reported market value. Fluctuation in the market price of a security may result from perceived changes in the underlying economic characteristics of the investee, the relative price of alternative investments and general market conditions.

108


As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited common stock represented approximately 86% and 92%, respectively, of the total fair value of the Company's equity securities. The majority of the Company's remaining equity securities are held in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets and the realized and unrealized gains and losses are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates. The following table summarizes the Company's investment in BYD Company Limited as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 and the effects of a hypothetical 30% increase and a 30% decrease in market price as of those dates. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions).
EstimatedHypothetical
HypotheticalFair Value afterPercentage Increase
FairPriceHypothetical(Decrease) in BHE
ValueChangeChange in PricesShareholders' Equity
As of December 31, 2022$3,763 30% increase$4,892 %
30% decrease2,634 (1)
As of December 31, 2021$7,693 30% increase$10,001 %
30% decrease5,385 (3)

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

BHE's business operations and investments outside of the U.S. increase its risk related to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates primarily in relation to the British pound and the Canadian dollar. BHE's reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, and the value of the assets and liabilities, earnings, cash flows and potential distributions from BHE's foreign operations changes with the fluctuations of the currency in which they transact.

Northern Powergrid's functional currency is the British pound. As of December 31, 2022, a 10% devaluation in the British pound to the U.S. dollar would result in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet being negatively impacted by a $491 million cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI. A 10% devaluation in the average currency exchange rate would have resulted in lower reported earnings for Northern Powergrid of $39 million in 2022.

BHE Canada's functional currency is the Canadian dollar. As of December 31, 2022, a 10% devaluation in the Canadian dollar to the U.S. dollar would result in the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet being negatively impacted by a $387 million cumulative translation adjustment in AOCI. A 10% devaluation in the average currency exchange rate would have resulted in lower reported earnings for BHE Canada of $18 million in 2022.

Credit Risk

Domestic Regulated Operations

The Utilities are exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent the Utilities' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, the Utilities analyze the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establish limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluate the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, the Utilities enter into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, the Utilities exercise rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp's aggregate credit exposure with wholesale energy supply and marketing counterparties included counterparties having non-investment grade, internally rated credit ratings. Substantially all of these non-investment grade, internally rated counterparties are associated with long-duration solar and wind power purchase agreements, some of which are from facilities that have not yet achieved commercial operation and for which PacifiCorp has no obligation should the facilities not achieve commercial operation.

109


Substantially all of MidAmerican Energy's electric wholesale sales revenue results from participation in RTOs, including the MISO and the PJM. MidAmerican Energy's share of historical losses from defaults by other RTO market participants has not been material. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, MidAmerican Energy's aggregate direct credit exposure from electric wholesale marketing counterparties was not material.

As of December 31, 2022, NV Energy's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral, was not material.

BHE GT&S primary customers include electric and natural gas distribution utilities and LNG export, import and storage customers. Northern Natural Gas' primary customers include utilities in the upper Midwest. Kern River's primary customers are electric and natural gas distribution utilities, major oil and natural gas companies or affiliates of such companies, electric generating companies, energy marketing and trading companies and financial institutions. As a general policy, collateral is not required for receivables from creditworthy customers. Customers' financial condition and creditworthiness, as defined by the tariff, are regularly evaluated and historical losses have been minimal. In order to provide protection against credit risk, and as permitted by the separate terms of each of BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas' and Kern River's tariffs, the companies have required customers that lack creditworthiness to provide cash deposits, letters of credit or other security until they meet the creditworthiness requirements of the respective tariff.

Northern Powergrid

The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies charge fees for the use of their distribution systems to supply companies. The supply companies purchase electricity from generators and traders, sell the electricity to end-use customers and use the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' distribution networks pursuant to the multilateral "Distribution Connection and Use of System Agreement." The Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies' customers are concentrated in a small number of electricity supply businesses. During 2022, E.ON and certain of its affiliates and British Gas Trading Limited represented approximately 22% and 14%, respectively, of the total combined distribution revenue of the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies. The industry operates in accordance with a framework which sets credit limits for each supply business based on its credit rating or payment history and requires them to provide credit cover if their value at risk (measured as being equivalent to 45 days usage) exceeds the credit limit. Acceptable credit typically is provided in the form of a parent company guarantee, letter of credit or an escrow account. Ofgem has indicated that, provided the Northern Powergrid Distribution Companies have implemented credit control, billing and collection in line with best practice guidelines and can demonstrate compliance with the guidelines or are able to satisfactorily explain departure from the guidelines, any bad debt losses arising from supplier default will be recovered through an increase in future allowed income. Losses incurred to date have not been material.

BHE Canada

AltaLink's primary source of operating revenue is the AESO, an entity rated AA- by Standard and Poor's. Because of the dependence on a single customer, any material failure of the customer to fulfill its obligations would significantly impair AltaLink's ability to meet its existing and future obligations. Total operating revenue for AltaLink was $681 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.

BHE Renewables

BHE Renewables owns independent power projects that generally have separate project financing agreements. These projects source of operating revenue is derived primarily from long-term power purchase agreements with single customers, primarily utilities, which expire between 2023 and 2043. Because of the dependence generally from a single customer at each project, any material failure of the customer to fulfill its obligations would significantly impair that project's ability to meet its existing and future obligations. Total operating revenue for BHE Renewables was $994 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.

110


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

111


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company
Des Moines, Iowa

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.


Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 7 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company is subject to rate regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as well as certain other regulatory commissions (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the electric and natural gas rates of the Company's regulated businesses in the respective service territories where the Company operates. Management has determined its regulated operations meet the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.
112


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow the Company an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While the Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit the Company's ability to recover their costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, and (3) refunds to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the future outcome of decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated the Company's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.

Wildfires — Contingencies — See Note 16 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in the Company's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, the Company is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire (the "Wildfires"). In determining this exposure, the Company is required to determine whether the likelihood of loss for each of the Wildfires is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the Wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with claimants.

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If deemed reasonably possible, the Company is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts.

Management has recorded estimated liabilities of $424 million and receivables of $246 million, which represent its best estimate of probable losses and expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company recognized probable losses, net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively. Management has disclosed reasonably possible estimated losses of $31 million, net of potential insurance recoveries of $103 million, associated with the 2022 McKinney Fire.

113


We identified wildfire-related contingencies and the related disclosures as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to determine the probability of loss and estimate the probable or reasonably possible losses and insurance recoveries. This required the application of a high degree of judgment and extensive effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's judgments, estimates and disclosures related to wildfire-related loss contingencies.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management's judgments regarding the probability of loss, estimated losses and insurance recoveries, and related disclosures for wildfire-related contingencies included the following, among others:
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether a loss was probable or reasonably possible for the Wildfires by inquiring of management and the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding the likelihood and amounts of probable and reasonably possible losses, including the potential impact of information gained through investigations into the cause of the fires, information from claimants, the advice of legal counsel, and reading external information for any evidence that might contradict management's assertions.
We evaluated the estimation methodology for determining the amount of probable and reasonably possible losses through inquiries with management and external and internal legal counsel and we tested the significant assumptions used in the estimates of probable and reasonably possible losses.
We read legal letters from the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding known information and evaluated whether the information therein was consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether related insurance recoveries were probable of collection by inquiring of management and the Company's external and internal legal counsel regarding the amounts of insurance recoveries recorded or disclosed. With the assistance of our insurance specialists, we tested the significant assumptions used in the determination of collectability, including obtaining and reading related policies to determine whether the types of insurance claims are included or excluded from coverage.
We evaluated whether the Company's disclosures were appropriate and consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.

/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
February 24, 2023

We have served as the Company's auditor since 1991.


114


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$1,591 $1,096 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents2,141 172 
Trade receivables, net2,876 2,468 
Inventories1,256 1,122 
Mortgage loans held for sale474 1,263 
Regulatory assets1,319 544 
Other current assets1,345 1,583 
Total current assets11,002 8,248 
  
Property, plant and equipment, net93,043 89,816 
Goodwill11,489 11,650 
Regulatory assets3,743 3,419 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments11,273 15,788 
Other assets3,290 3,144 
  
Total assets$133,840 $132,065 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
115


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$2,679 $2,136 
Accrued interest558 537 
Accrued property, income and other taxes746 606 
Accrued employee expenses333 372 
Short-term debt1,119 2,009 
Current portion of long-term debt3,201 1,265 
Other current liabilities1,677 1,837 
Total current liabilities10,313 8,762 
  
BHE senior debt13,096 13,003 
BHE junior subordinated debentures100 100 
Subsidiary debt35,238 35,394 
Regulatory liabilities7,070 6,960 
Deferred income taxes12,678 12,938 
Other long-term liabilities4,706 4,319 
Total liabilities83,201 81,476 
  
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16)
  
Equity:  
BHE shareholders' equity:  
Preferred stock - 100 shares authorized, $0.01 par value, 1 and 2 shares issued and outstanding850 1,650 
Common stock - 115 shares authorized, no par value, 76 shares issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital6,298 6,374 
Long-term income tax receivable— (744)
Retained earnings41,833 40,754 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(2,149)(1,340)
Total BHE shareholders' equity46,832 46,694 
Noncontrolling interests3,807 3,895 
Total equity50,639 50,589 
  
Total liabilities and equity$133,840 $132,065 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
116


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Energy$21,069 $18,935 $15,556 
Real estate5,268 6,215 5,396 
Total operating revenue26,337 25,150 20,952 
 
Operating expenses: 
Energy: 
Cost of sales6,757 5,504 4,187 
Operations and maintenance4,217 3,991 3,545 
Depreciation and amortization4,230 3,829 3,410 
Property and other taxes775 789 634 
Real estate5,117 5,710 4,885 
Total operating expenses21,096 19,823 16,661 
  
Operating income5,241 5,327 4,291 
 
Other income (expense): 
Interest expense(2,216)(2,118)(2,021)
Capitalized interest76 64 80 
Allowance for equity funds167 126 165 
Interest and dividend income154 89 71 
(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net(2,002)1,823 4,797 
Other, net(7)(17)88 
Total other income (expense)(3,828)(33)3,180 
  
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss1,413 5,294 7,471 
Income tax (benefit) expense(1,916)(1,132)308 
Equity loss(185)(237)(149)
Net income3,144 6,189 7,014 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests423 399 71 
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders2,721 5,790 6,943 
Preferred dividends46 121 26 
Earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $6,917 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

117


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income$3,144 $6,189 $7,014 
 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $(23), $55 and $(19)(72)174 (65)
Foreign currency translation adjustment(810)(24)234 
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $20, $10 and $(3)76 67 (15)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(806)217 154 
    
Comprehensive income2,338 6,406 7,168 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests426 404 71 
Comprehensive income attributable to BHE shareholders$1,912 $6,002 $7,097 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

118


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)
BHE Shareholders' Equity
Long-termAccumulated
AdditionalIncomeOther
PreferredCommonPaid-inTaxRetainedComprehensiveNoncontrollingTotal
StockStockCapitalReceivableEarningsLoss, NetInterestsEquity
Balance, December 31, 2019$— $— $6,389 $(530)$28,296 $(1,706)$129 $32,578 
Net income— — — — 6,943 — 70 7,013 
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 154 — 154 
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — (128)— — — (128)
Issuance of preferred stock3,750 — — — — — — 3,750 
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (26)— — (26)
Common stock purchases— (6)— (120)— — (126)
Distributions— — — — — — (121)(121)
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — (5)— — — (28)(33)
BHE GT&S acquisition -
   noncontrolling interest
— — — — — — 3,916 3,916 
Other equity transactions— — (1)— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20203,750 — 6,377 (658)35,093 (1,552)3,967 46,977 
Net income— — — — 5,790 — 397 6,187 
Other comprehensive income— — — — — 212 217 
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — (86)(8)— — (94)
Preferred stock redemptions(2,100)— — — — — — (2,100)
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (121)— — (121)
Distributions— — — — — (478)(478)
Contributions— — — — — — 
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — (3)— — — (4)(7)
Other equity transactions— — — — — — (1)(1)
Balance, December 31, 20211,650 — 6,374 (744)40,754 (1,340)3,895 50,589 
Net income— — — — 2,721 — 421 3,142 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — — — — (809)(806)
Long-term income tax
   receivable adjustments
— — — 744 (791)— — (47)
Preferred stock redemptions(800)— — — — — — (800)
Preferred stock dividend— — — — (46)— — (46)
Common stock purchases— — (77)— (793)— — (870)
Distributions— — — — — (522)(522)
Contributions— — — — — — 
Purchase of noncontrolling
   interest
— — — — — — 
Other equity transactions— — — (12)— (1)(12)
Balance, December 31, 2022$850 $— $6,298 $— $41,833 $(2,149)$3,807 $50,639 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

119


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$3,144 $6,189 $7,014 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Losses (gains) on marketable securities, net2,002 (1,823)(4,797)
Depreciation and amortization4,286 3,881 3,455 
Allowance for equity funds(167)(126)(165)
Equity loss, net of distributions319 380 248 
Net power cost deferrals(1,290)(520)(62)
Amortization of net power cost deferrals357 107 (5)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(146)(255)(348)
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits, net(467)646 1,880 
Other, net59 (57)(23)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Trade receivables and other assets20 553 (1,318)
Derivative collateral, net121 82 43 
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans(27)(39)(65)
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net397 (489)(134)
Accounts payable and other liabilities751 163 501 
Net cash flows from operating activities9,359 8,692 6,224 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(7,505)(6,611)(6,765)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(314)(122)(2,397)
Purchases of marketable securities(574)(297)(370)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities2,464 273 325 
Purchases of other investments(1,958)(20)(1,323)
Proceeds from other investments1,300 13 
Equity method investments119 (212)(2,724)
Other, net12 (74)76 
Net cash flows from investing activities(7,750)(5,763)(13,165)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock— — 3,750 
Preferred stock redemptions(800)(2,100)— 
Preferred dividends(50)(132)(7)
Common stock purchases(870)— (126)
Proceeds from BHE senior debt986 — 5,212 
Repayments of BHE senior debt— (450)(350)
Proceeds from subsidiary debt2,887 2,409 2,688 
Repayments of subsidiary debt(1,494)(2,024)(2,841)
Net repayments of short-term debt(867)(276)(939)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(524)(488)(122)
Other, net(274)(70)(162)
Net cash flows from financing activities(1,006)(3,131)7,103 
Effect of exchange rate changes(30)15 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents573 (201)177 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period1,244 1,445 1,268 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$1,817 $1,244 $1,445 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
120


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)Organization and Operations

Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE") is a holding company that owns a highly diversified portfolio of locally managed and operated businesses principally engaged in the energy industry (collectively with its subsidiaries, the "Company") and is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").

The Company's operations are organized as eight business segments: PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries ("PacifiCorp"), MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries ("MidAmerican Funding") (which primarily consists of MidAmerican Energy Company ("MidAmerican Energy")), NV Energy, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("NV Energy") (which primarily consists of Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") and Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific")), Northern Powergrid Holdings Company and its subsidiaries ("Northern Powergrid") (which primarily consists of Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc), BHE Pipeline Group, LLC and its subsidiaries (which primarily consists of BHE GT&S, LLC and its subsidiaries ("BHE GT&S"), Northern Natural Gas Company ("Northern Natural Gas") and Kern River Gas Transmission Company ("Kern River")), BHE Transmission (which consists of BHE Canada Holdings Corporation and its subsidiaries ("BHE Canada") (which primarily consists of AltaLink, L.P. ("AltaLink")) and BHE U.S. Transmission, LLC and its subsidiaries), BHE Renewables, LLC and its subsidiaries ("BHE Renewables") and HomeServices of America, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("HomeServices"). The Company, through these locally managed and operated businesses, owns four utility companies in the U.S. serving customers in 11 states, two electricity distribution companies in Great Britain, five interstate natural gas pipeline companies and interests in a liquefied natural gas ("LNG") export, import and storage facility in the U.S., an electric transmission business in Canada, interests in electric transmission businesses in the U.S., a renewable energy business primarily investing in wind, solar, geothermal and hydroelectric projects, the largest residential real estate brokerage firm in the U.S. and one of the largest residential real estate brokerage franchise networks in the U.S.

(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of BHE and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. The Consolidated Statements of Operations include the revenue and expenses of any acquired entities from the date of acquisition. The Company consolidates variable interest entities ("VIE") in which it possesses both (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; impairment of goodwill; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

121


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific, BHE GT&S, Northern Natural Gas, Kern River and AltaLink (the "Regulated Businesses") prepare their financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, the Regulated Businesses defer the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Alternative valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist substantially of funds restricted for debt service obligations for certain of the Company's nonregulated renewable energy projects. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$1,591 $1,096 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents173 127 
Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments53 21 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$1,817 $1,244 

Investments

Fixed Maturity Securities

The Company's management determines the appropriate classification of investments in fixed maturity securities at the acquisition date and reevaluates the classification at each balance sheet date. Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments that management does not intend to use or is restricted from using in current operations are presented as noncurrent on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Available-for-sale investments are carried at fair value with realized gains and losses, as determined on a specific identification basis, recognized in earnings and unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI, net of tax. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates. Trading investments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Held-to-maturity investments are carried at amortized cost, reflecting the ability and intent to hold the securities to maturity. The difference between the original cost and maturity value of a fixed maturity security is amortized to earnings using the interest method.
122



Investment gains and losses arise when investments are sold (as determined on a specific identification basis) or are other-than-temporarily impaired with respect to securities classified as available-for-sale. If the value of a fixed maturity investment declines to below amortized cost and the decline is deemed other than temporary, the amortized cost of the investment is reduced to fair value, with a corresponding charge to earnings. Any resulting impairment loss is recognized in earnings if the Company intends to sell, or expects to be required to sell, the debt security before its amortized cost is recovered. If the Company does not expect to ultimately recover the amortized cost basis even if it does not intend to sell the security, the credit loss component is recognized in earnings and any difference between fair value and the amortized cost basis, net of the credit loss, is reflected in other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI"). For regulated fixed maturity investments, any impairment charge is offset by the establishment of a regulatory asset to the extent recovery in regulated rates is probable.

Equity Securities

Investments in equity securities are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings as a component of gains (losses) on marketable securities, net. All changes in fair value of equity securities in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets are recorded as a net regulatory liability since the Company expects to recover costs for these activities through regulated rates.

Equity Method Investments

The Company utilizes the equity method of accounting with respect to investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when the investor possesses more than 20% of the voting interests of the investee. This presumption may be overcome based on specific facts and circumstances that demonstrate that the ability to exercise significant influence is restricted. In applying the equity method, the Company records the investment at cost and subsequently increases or decreases the carrying value of the investment by the Company's share of the net earnings or losses and OCI of the investee. The Company records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment. Certain equity investments are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets net of related investment tax credits.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on the Company's assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to the Company by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, the Company primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, the Company may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. The change in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$108 $77 $44 
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net43 81 56 
Acquisitions— — 
Write-offs, net(45)(50)(28)
Ending balance$106 $108 $77 

Derivatives

The Company employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price, interest rate, and foreign currency exchange rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements. Cash collateral received from or paid to counterparties to secure derivative contract assets or liabilities in excess of amounts offset is included in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

123


Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked-to-market and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For the Company's derivatives not designated as hedging contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For the Company's derivatives not designated as hedging contracts and for which changes in fair value are not recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as operating revenue for sales contracts; cost of sales and operating expense for purchase contracts and electricity, natural gas and fuel swap contracts; and other, net for interest rate swap derivatives.

For the Company's derivatives designated as hedging contracts, the Company formally assesses, at inception and thereafter, whether the hedging contract is highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged item. The Company formally documents hedging activity by transaction type and risk management strategy.

Changes in the estimated fair value of a derivative contract designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge, to the extent effective, are included on the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity as AOCI, net of tax, until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it has determined that a derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, or when it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur. When hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, future changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative contract are charged to earnings. Gains and losses related to discontinued hedges that were previously recorded in AOCI will remain in AOCI until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings, unless it becomes probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur at which time associated deferred amounts in AOCI are immediately recognized in earnings.

Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of fuel, which includes coal stocks, stored gas and fuel oil, totaling $248 million and $296 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and materials and supplies totaling $1,008 million and $826 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The cost of materials and supplies, coal stocks and fuel oil is determined primarily using the average cost method. The cost of stored gas is determined using either the last-in-first-out ("LIFO") method or the lower of average cost or market. With respect to inventories carried at LIFO cost, the replacement cost would be $22 million and $27 million higher as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. The Company capitalizes all construction-related materials, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include capitalized interest, including debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable to the Regulated Businesses. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has regulatory arrangements in Iowa in which the carrying cost of certain utility plant has been reduced for amounts associated with electric returns on equity exceeding specified thresholds.

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by the Company's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by the Regulated Businesses to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

124


Generally when the Company retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, is capitalized by the Regulated Businesses as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") and the Alberta Utilities Commission ("AUC"). After construction is completed, the Company is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. The Company's AROs are primarily related to the decommissioning of nuclear generating facilities and obligations associated with its other generating facilities and offshore natural gas pipelines. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. For the Regulated Businesses, the difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.

Impairment

The Company evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As a majority of all property, plant and equipment is used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

Leases

The Company has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office space, office equipment, generating facilities, land and rail cars and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities and vehicles. These leases generally require the Company to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. The Company does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating the Company is reasonably certain to exercise the option. The Company's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

The Company's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

The Company's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

125


Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31, 2022. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, the Company estimates the fair value of its reporting units. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the estimated fair value, then the excess is charged to earnings as an impairment loss. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. The determination of fair value incorporates significant unobservable inputs. During 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company did not record any material goodwill impairments.

The Company records goodwill adjustments for changes to the purchase price allocation prior to the end of the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date.

Revenue Recognition

    Customer Revenue

The Company uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In the event one of the parties to a contract has performed before the other, the Company would recognize a contract asset or contract liability depending on the relationship between the Company's performance and the customer's payment.

        Energy Products and Services

A majority of the Company's energy revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission, distribution and natural gas and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. The Company's energy revenue that is nonregulated primarily relates to the Company's renewable energy business.

Revenue recognized is equal to what the Company has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of the Company's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $828 million and $718 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued.

        Real Estate Services

The Company's HomeServices reportable segment consists of separate brokerage, mortgage and franchise businesses. Rates charged for brokerage, mortgage and franchise real estate services are established through contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price and the allocation of the price amongst the separate performance obligations.

The full-service residential real estate brokerage business has performance obligations to deliver integrated real estate services including brokerage services, title and closing services, property and casualty insurance, home warranties, relocation services, and other home-related services to customers. All performance obligations related to the full-service residential real estate brokerage business are satisfied in less than one year at the point in time when a real estate transaction is closed or when services are provided. Commission revenue from real estate brokerage transactions and related amounts due to agents are recognized when a real estate transaction is closed. Title and escrow closing fee revenue from real estate transactions and related amounts due to the title insurer are recognized at closing. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer at closing.

126


The franchise business operates a network that has performance obligations to provide the right to use certain brand names and other related service marks as well as to provide orientation programs, training and consultation services, advertising programs and other services to its franchisees. The performance obligations related to the franchise business are satisfied over time or when the services are provided. Franchise royalty fees are sales-based variable consideration and are based on a percentage of commissions earned by franchisees on real estate sales, which are recognized when the sale closes. Meetings and training revenue, referral fees, late fees, service fees and franchise termination fees are earned when services have been completed. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the franchisee within 30 days of billing.

    Other Revenue

Energy Products and Services

Other revenue consists primarily of revenue related to power purchase agreements not considered Customer Revenue as they are recognized in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging" and ASC 842, "Leases" and certain non-tariff-based revenue approved by the regulator that is not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers."

        Real Estate Service

Mortgage and other revenue consists primarily of revenue related to the mortgage business. Mortgage fee revenue consists of amounts earned related to application and underwriting fees and fees on canceled loans. Fees associated with the origination of mortgage loans are recognized as earned. These amounts are not considered Customer Revenue as they are recognized in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging," ASC 825, "Financial Instruments" and ASC 860, "Transfers and Servicing."

Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Debt Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Foreign Currency

The accounts of foreign-based subsidiaries are measured in most instances using the local currency of the subsidiary as the functional currency. Revenue and expenses of these businesses are translated into U.S. dollars at the average exchange rate for the period. Assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate as of the end of the reporting period. Gains or losses from translating the financial statements of foreign-based operations are included in equity as a component of AOCI. Gains or losses arising from transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of the entity that is party to the transaction are included in earnings.

Income Taxes

The Company's provision for income taxes has been computed on a stand-alone basis. Berkshire Hathaway includes the Company in its consolidated U.S. federal and Iowa state income tax returns and the majority of the Company's U.S. federal income tax is remitted to or received from Berkshire Hathaway.

127


Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of OCI are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with income tax benefits and expense for certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that the Company's regulated businesses deems probable to be passed on to their customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties or as prescribed by various regulatory commissions. The Company has not established deferred income taxes on its undistributed foreign earnings that have been determined by management to be reinvested indefinitely.

The Company recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in accrued property, income and other taxes and other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3)    Business Acquisitions

BHE GT&S Acquisition

Transaction Description

On November 1, 2020, BHE completed its acquisition of substantially all of the natural gas transmission and storage business of Dominion Energy, Inc. ("DEI") and Dominion Energy Questar Corporation ("Dominion Questar"), exclusive of Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC and related entities (the "Questar Pipeline Group") (the "GT&S Transaction"). Under the terms of the Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated July 3, 2020 (the "GT&S Purchase Agreement"), BHE paid approximately $2.5 billion in cash, after post-closing adjustments (the "GT&S Cash Consideration") for 100% of the equity interests of Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. ("EGTS") and Carolina Gas Transmission, LLC; 50% of the equity interests of Iroquois Gas Transmission System L.P. ("Iroquois"); and a 25% economic interest in Cove Point LNG, LP ("Cove Point"), consisting of 100% of the general partnership interest and 25% of the total limited partnership interests. BHE became the operator of Cove Point after the GT&S Transaction.

On October 5, 2020, DEI and Dominion Questar, as permitted under the terms of the GT&S Purchase Agreement, delivered notice to BHE of their election to terminate the GT&S Transaction with respect to the Questar Pipeline Group and, in connection with the execution of the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement referenced below, to waive the related termination fee under the GT&S Purchase Agreement. Also on October 5, 2020, BHE entered into a second Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement") with Dominion Questar providing for BHE's purchase of the Questar Pipeline Group from Dominion Questar (the "Q-Pipe Transaction") for a cash purchase price of approximately $1.3 billion (the "Q-Pipe Cash Consideration"), subject to adjustment for cash and indebtedness as of the closing.

Under the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement, BHE delivered the Q-Pipe Cash Consideration of approximately $1.3 billion to Dominion Questar on November 2, 2020. Pursuant to the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement, Dominion Questar agreed that, if the Q-Pipe Transaction did not close, it would repay all or (depending upon the repayment date) substantially all of the Q-Pipe Cash Consideration (the "Purchase Price Repayment Amount") to BHE on or prior to December 31, 2021.

On July 9, 2021, Dominion Questar and DEI delivered a written notice to BHE stating that BHE and Dominion Questar have mutually elected to terminate the Q-Pipe Purchase Agreement and on July 14, 2021, BHE received the Purchase Price Repayment Amount of approximately $1.3 billion in cash, which was included in proceeds from other investments on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2021.

128


Included in BHE's Consolidated Statement of Operations within the BHE Pipeline Group reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, is operating revenue of $2,402 million, $2,159 million and $331 million, respectively, and net income attributable to BHE shareholders of $549 million, $316 million and $73 million, respectively, as a result of including BHE GT&S from November 1, 2020. Additionally, BHE incurred $9 million of direct transaction costs associated with the GT&S Transaction that are included in operating expense on the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Pro Forma Financial Information

The following unaudited pro forma financial information reflects the consolidated results of operations of BHE and the amortization of the purchase price adjustments assuming the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2019, excluding non-recurring transaction costs incurred by BHE during 2020 (in millions):
2020
Operating revenue$22,581 
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders$6,800 

Other

In 2022, the Company completed various acquisitions totaling $314 million, net of cash acquired. The purchase price for each acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which related to residential real estate brokerage businesses, 300 MWs of long-term transmission rights and 399 MWs of wind-powered generating facilities. As a result of the various acquisitions, the Company acquired assets of $363 million, assumed liabilities of $65 million and recognized goodwill of $16 million.

In 2021, the Company completed various acquisitions totaling $122 million, net of cash acquired. The purchase price for each acquisition was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which related to residential real estate brokerage businesses. As a result of the various acquisitions, the Company acquired assets of $54 million, assumed liabilities of $61 million and recognized goodwill of $129 million.
129


(4)Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Regulated assets:
Utility generation, transmission and distribution systems5-80 years$92,759 $90,223 
Interstate natural gas pipeline assets3-80 years18,328 17,423 
111,087 107,646 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(34,599)(32,680)
Regulated assets, net76,488 74,966 
Nonregulated assets:
Independent power plants2-50 years8,545 7,665 
Cove Point LNG facility40 years3,412 3,364 
Other assets2-30 years2,693 2,666 
14,650 13,695 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(3,452)(3,041)
Nonregulated assets, net11,198 10,654 
87,686 85,620 
Construction work-in-progress5,357 4,196 
Property, plant and equipment, net$93,043 $89,816 

Construction work-in-progress includes $4.9 billion and $3.8 billion as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, related to the construction of regulated assets.

(5)Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements, the Domestic Regulated Businesses, as tenants in common, have undivided interests in jointly owned generation, transmission, distribution and pipeline common facilities. The Company accounts for its proportionate share of each facility and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include the Company's share of the expenses of these facilities.


130


The amounts shown in the table below represent the Company's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):
AccumulatedConstruction
CompanyFacility InDepreciation andWork-in-
ShareServiceAmortizationProgress
PacifiCorp:
Jim Bridger Nos. 1-467 %$1,529 $914 $39 
Hunter No. 194 517 227 
Hunter No. 260 305 148 
Wyodak80 491 273 
Colstrip Nos. 3 and 410 262 178 — 
Hermiston50 189 106 — 
Craig Nos. 1 and 219 372 331 — 
Hayden No. 125 77 52 — 
Hayden No. 213 44 31 — 
Transmission and distribution facilitiesVarious916 274 129 
Total PacifiCorp4,702 2,534 178 
MidAmerican Energy:
Louisa No. 188 %976 511 
Quad Cities Nos. 1 and 2(1)
25 730 482 11 
Walter Scott, Jr. No. 379 964 624 13 
Walter Scott, Jr. No. 4(2)
60 171 127 
George Neal No. 441 321 184 
Ottumwa No. 1(2)
52 569 280 19 
George Neal No. 372 535 312 20 
Transmission facilitiesVarious267 101 
Total MidAmerican Energy4,533 2,621 82 
NV Energy:
Navajo11 %— 
Valmy50 399 327 
On Line Transmission Line25 161 34 
Transmission facilitiesVarious60 29 
Total NV Energy621 394 
BHE Pipeline Group:
Ellisburg Pool39 %32 11 — 
Ellisburg Station50 26 
Harrison50 53 18 — 
Leidy50 143 47 
Oakford50 202 70 
Common FacilitiesVarious275 176 — 
Total BHE Pipeline Group731 330 
Total$10,587 $5,879 $272 
(1)Includes amounts related to nuclear fuel.
(2)Facility in-service and accumulated depreciation and amortization amounts are net of credits applied under Iowa regulatory arrangements totaling $733 million and $150 million, respectively.

131


(6)    Leases

The following table summarizes the Company's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$545 $524 
Finance leases418 448 
Total right-of-use assets$963 $972 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$605 $577 
Finance leases432 463 
Total lease liabilities$1,037 $1,040 

The following table summarizes the Company's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Variable$552 $611$592
Operating136 161151
Finance:
Amortization20 2318
Interest36 3840
Short-term44 1520
Total lease costs$788 $848$821
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases7.47.67.4
Finance leases28.128.127.5
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases4.1 %4.3 %4.5 %
Finance leases8.6 %8.6 %8.5 %

The following table summarizes the Company's supplemental cash flow information relating to leases for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(141)$(163)$(152)
Operating cash flows from finance leases(36)(38)(40)
Financing cash flows from finance leases(25)(28)(24)
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases$131 $119 $83 
Finance leases19 

132


The Company has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$158 $63 $221 
2024126 62 188 
2025101 61 162 
202678 60 138 
202753 56 109 
Thereafter189 559 748 
Total undiscounted lease payments705 861 1,566 
Less - amounts representing interest(100)(429)(529)
Lease liabilities$605 $432 $1,037 

(7)Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future regulated rates. The Company's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred net power costs1 year$1,478 $531 
Asset retirement obligations15 years835 742 
Employee benefit plans(1)
14 years490 472 
Deferred income taxes(2)
Various373 342 
Asset disposition costsVarious231 285 
Demand side management10 years224 211 
Levelized depreciation28 years151 135 
Unrealized losses on regulated derivative contracts1 year112 157 
Environmental costs30 years111 108 
Wildfire mitigation and vegetation management costsVarious111 21 
Deferred operating costs10 years83 103 
OtherVarious863 856 
Total regulatory assets$5,062 $3,963 
Reflected as:
Current assets$1,319 $544 
Noncurrent assets3,743 3,419 
Total regulatory assets$5,062 $3,963 
(1)Includes amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.
(2)Amounts primarily represent income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

The Company had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $2.3 billion and $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

133


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent income to be recognized or amounts to be returned to customers in future periods. The Company's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred income taxes(1)
Various$2,901 $3,185 
Cost of removal(2)
27 years2,578 2,424 
Revenue sharing mechanisms2 years426 188 
Unrealized gains on regulated derivative contracts1 year343 86 
Asset retirement obligations31 years250 345 
Levelized depreciation28 years245 259 
Employee benefit plans(3)
Various180 243 
OtherVarious446 484 
Total regulatory liabilities$7,369 $7,214 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$299 $254 
Noncurrent liabilities7,070 6,960 
Total regulatory liabilities$7,369 $7,214 
(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.
(3)Includes amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be returned to customers in future periods when recognized.
134


(8)Investments and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments

Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Investments:
BYD Company Limited common stock$3,763 $7,693 
U.S. Treasury Bills1,931 — 
Rabbi trusts433 492 
Other335 305 
Total investments6,462 8,490 
  
Equity method investments:
BHE Renewables tax equity investments4,535 4,931 
Electric Transmission Texas, LLC623 595 
Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.600 735 
Other304 293 
Total equity method investments6,062 6,554 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments:  
Quad Cities Station nuclear decommissioning trust funds664 768 
Other restricted cash and cash equivalents226 148 
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments890 916 
  
Total investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments$13,414 $15,960 
Reflected as:
Other current assets$2,141 $172 
Noncurrent assets11,273 15,788 
Total investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments$13,414 $15,960 

Investments

BHE's investment in BYD Company Limited common stock is accounted for as a marketable security with changes in fair value recognized in net income.

Rabbi trusts primarily hold corporate-owned life insurance on certain current and former key executives and directors. The Rabbi trusts were established to hold investments used to fund the obligations of various nonqualified executive and director compensation plans and to pay the costs of the trusts. The amount represents the cash surrender value of all of the policies included in the Rabbi trusts, net of amounts borrowed against the cash surrender value.

(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net recognized during the period consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Unrealized (losses) gains recognized on marketable securities held at the reporting date$(1,487)$1,819 $4,791 
Net (losses) gains recognized on marketable securities sold during the period(515)
(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net$(2,002)$1,823 $4,797 

135


Equity Method Investments

The Company has invested in wind projects sponsored by third parties, commonly referred to as tax equity investments. Under the terms of these tax equity investments, the Company has entered into equity capital contribution agreements with the project sponsors that require contributions. The Company made no contributions in 2022 and 2021 and $2,736 million in 2020. Once a project achieves commercial operation, the Company enters into a partnership agreement with the project sponsor that directs and allocates the operating profits and tax benefits from the project.

BHE, through separate subsidiaries, owns (i) 50% of Iroquois, which owns and operates an interstate natural gas pipeline located in the states of New York and Connecticut; (ii) 50% of Electric Transmission Texas, LLC, which owns and operates electric transmission assets in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas footprint; (iii) 50% of JAX LNG, LLC, which is an LNG supplier in Florida serving the growing marine and truck LNG markets; and (iv) 66.67% of Bridger Coal Company ("Bridger Coal"), which is a coal mining joint venture that supplies coal to PacifiCorp's Jim Bridger Nos. 1-4 generating facility. Bridger Coal is being accounted for under the equity method of accounting as the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Bridger Coal's economic performance are shared with the joint venture partner. Coal purchases from Bridger Coal for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 totaled $100 million, $132 million and $128 million, respectively.

Restricted Investments

MidAmerican Energy has established a trust for the investment of funds for decommissioning the Quad Cities Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station"). The debt and equity securities in the trust are reported at fair value. Funds are invested in the trust in accordance with applicable federal and state investment guidelines and are restricted for use as reimbursement for costs of decommissioning the Quad Cities Station, which are currently licensed for operation until December 2032.

(9)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes BHE's and its subsidiaries' availability under their credit facilities as of December 31 (in millions):
MidAmericanNVNorthernBHE
BHEPacifiCorpFundingEnergyPowergridCanadaHomeServices
Total(1)
2022:
Credit facilities(2)
$3,500 $1,200 $1,509 $650 $296 $793 $2,925 $10,873 
Less: 
Short-term debt(245)— — — (120)(197)(557)(1,119)
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit— (249)(370)— — (1)— (620)
Net credit facilities$3,255 $951 $1,139 $650 $176 $595 $2,368 $9,134 
2021:
Credit facilities(2)
$3,500 $1,200 $1,509 $650 $271 $851 $3,300 $11,281 
Less: 
Short-term debt— — — (339)(1)(245)(1,424)(2,009)
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit— (218)(370)— — (1)— (589)
Net credit facilities$3,500 $982 $1,139 $311 $270 $605 $1,876 $8,683 
(1)The table does not include unused credit facilities and letters of credit for investments that are accounted for under the equity method.
(2)Includes $55 million and $1 million, respectively, drawn on capital expenditure and other uncommitted credit facilities at Northern Powergrid as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of its credit facilities and letter of credit arrangements.

136


BHE

BHE has a $3.5 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options subject to lender consent. This credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes, supports BHE's commercial paper program and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") or a base rate, at BHE's option, plus a spread that varies based on BHE's credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, BHE had $245 million and $— million of commercial paper borrowings outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 4.55% and —%, respectively. The credit facility requires that BHE's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.70 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, BHE had $101 million of letters of credit outstanding outside of its credit facility. These letters of credit primarily support power purchase agreements and debt service requirements at certain subsidiaries of BHE Renewables, LLC expiring through January 2024 and have provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration dates for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

PacifiCorp

PacifiCorp has a $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which supports PacifiCorp's commercial paper program and certain series of its tax-exempt bond obligations and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on SOFR or a base rate, at PacifiCorp's option, plus a spread that varies based on PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp entered into an additional $800 million 364-day unsecured credit facility expiring in January 2024.No amounts are currently outstanding against this new credit facility.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp did not have any commercial paper borrowings outstanding. The credit facility requires that PacifiCorp's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had $38 million and $19 million, respectively, of fully available letters of credit issued under committed arrangements outside of its credit facility in support of certain transactions required by third parties that generally have provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration dates for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

MidAmerican Funding

As of December 31, 2022, MidAmerican Energy has a $1.5 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which supports MidAmerican Energy's commercial paper program and its variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on SOFR or a base rate, at MidAmerican Energy's option, plus a spread that varies based on MidAmerican Energy's credit ratings for senior unsecured long-term debt securities.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, MidAmerican Energy had no commercial paper borrowings outstanding. The $1.5 billion credit facility requires that MidAmerican Energy's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of any quarter.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, MidAmerican Energy had $34 million and $42 million, respectively, of fully available letters of credit issued under committed arrangements outside of its credit facility in support of certain transactions required by third parties that generally have provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration dates for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

137


NV Energy

Nevada Power has a $400 million secured revolvingcredit facility expiring in June 2025 and Sierra Pacific has a $250 million secured credit facility expiring in June 2025 each with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. These credit facilities, which are for general corporate purposes and provide for the issuance of letters of credit, have a variable interest rate based on SOFR or a base rate, at each of the Nevada Utilities' option, plus a spread that varies based on each of the Nevada Utilities' credit ratings for its senior secured long‑term debt securities. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Nevada Utilities had borrowings of $— million and $339 million outstanding under these credit facilities at a weighted average interest rate of —% and 0.86%, respectively. Amounts due under each credit facility are collateralized by each of the Nevada Utilities' general and refunding mortgage bonds. These credit facilities require that each of the Nevada Utilities' ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.

Northern Powergrid

Northern Powergrid has a £200 million unsecured credit facility expiring in December 20192025 with a one-year maturity extension option remaining. The credit facility has a variable interest rate based on Sterling Overnight Index Average plus a spread that varies based on Northern Powergrid's credit ratings and a credit adjustment spread that varies based on the tenor of any borrowings. The credit facility requires that the ratio of consolidated senior total net debt, including current maturities, to regulated asset value not exceed 0.8 to 1.0 at Northern Powergrid and 0.65 to 1.0 at each of Northern Powergrid (Northeast) plc and Northern Powergrid (Yorkshire) plc as of June 30 and December 31. Northern Powergrid's interest coverage ratio shall not be less than 2.5 to 1.0.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Northern Powergrid had $65 million and $— million outstanding under this facility at a weighted average interest rate of 3.56% and —%, respectively.

AltaLink

AltaLink has a C$500 million secured revolving term credit facility expiring in December 2027 with a recurring one-year extension option subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which provides support for borrowings under the unsecuredsupports AltaLink's commercial paper program and may also be used for general corporate purposes, has a variable interest rate based on the Canadian bank prime lending rate or a spread above the Bankers' Acceptance rate, at ALP'sAltaLink's option, based on ALP'sAltaLink's credit ratings for its senior secured long-term debt securities. In addition, ALPAltaLink has a C$75 million secured revolving term credit facility expiring in December 20192027 with a recurring one-year extension option subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which may be used for general corporate purposes and letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Canadian bank prime lending rate, United StatesU.S. base rate, a spread above the United States LIBOR loan rate, or a spread above the Bankers' Acceptance rate, at ALP'sAltaLink's option, based on ALP'sAltaLink's credit ratings for its senior secured long-term debt securities. At the renewal date, ALP has the option to convert these facilities to one-year term facilities.


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, ALP2021, AltaLink had $121$89 million and $26$108 million outstanding under these facilities at a weighted average interest rate of 1.42%4.59% and 0.99%0.35%, respectively. The credit facilities require the ratio of consolidated indebtedness to total capitalization not exceed 0.75 to 1.0 measured as of the last day of each quarter.


AltaLink Investments, L.P. has a C$300 million unsecured revolving term credit facility expiring in December 2022 and a C$200 million unsecured revolving credit facility expiring in December 2018 each2026 with a recurring one-year extension option subject to lender consent. The credit facilities,facility, which may be used for general corporate purposes and letters of credit to a maximum of C$10 million, havehas a variable interest rate based on the Canadian bank prime lending rate, United StatesU.S. base rate, a spread above the United States LIBOR loan rate, or a spread above the Bankers' Acceptance rate, at AltaLink Investments, L.P.'s option, based on AltaLink Investments, L.P.'s credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities. 


AltaLink Investments, L.P. also has a C$200 million revolving term credit facility expiring in April 2023 with a recurring one-year extension option subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which may be used for general corporate purposes and letters of credit to a maximum of C$10 million, has a variable interest rate based on the Canadian bank prime lending rate, U.S. base rate, or a spread above the Bankers' Acceptance rate, at AltaLink Investments, L.P.'s option, based on AltaLink Investments, L.P.'s credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities. On an annual basis, with the consent of the lenders, AltaLink Investments, L.P. can request that the maturity date of the credit facility be extended for a further 365 days.

As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, AltaLink Investments, L.P. had $224$108 million and $263$137 million outstanding under these facilitiesthis facility at a weighted average interest rate of 2.40%5.71% and 1.74%1.46%, respectively. The credit facilities require the ratio of consolidated total debt to capitalization to not exceed 0.8 to 1.0 and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to interest expense for the four fiscal quarters ended to not be less than 2.25 to 1.0 measured as of the last day of each quarter.


138


HomeServices


HomeServices has a $600an $700 million unsecured credit facility expiring in September 2022.2026. The credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the LIBORLondon Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") or a base rate, at HomeServices' option, plus a spread that varies based on HomeServices' total net leverage ratio as of the last day of each quarter. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, HomeServices had $292$115 million and $50$250 million, respectively, outstanding under its credit facility with a weighted average interest rate of 2.75%5.17% and 1.77%0.95%, respectively.



Through its subsidiaries, HomeServices maintains mortgage lines of credit totaling $1.0$2.2 billion and $565 million$2.6 billion as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, used for mortgage banking activities that expire beginning in January 2018March 2023 through December 2018 or are due on demand.September 2023. The mortgage lines of credit have variable rates based on LIBORthe Bloomberg Short-term Bank Yield Index or SOFR, plus a spread. Collateral for these credit facilities is comprised of residential property being financed and is equal to the loans funded with the facilities. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, HomeServices had $440$442 million and $327 million,$1.2 billion, respectively, outstanding under these mortgage lines of credit at a weighted average interest rate of 3.60%6.09% and 2.77%1.91%, respectively.


BHE Renewables Letters of Credit


In connection with their bond offerings, Topaz and Solar Star entered into separate letter of credit and reimbursement facilities totaling $435 million and $627 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Letters of credit issued under the letter of credit facilities will be used to (a) provide security under the power purchase agreement and large generator interconnection agreements, (b) fund the debt service reserve requirement and the operation and maintenance debt service reserve requirement and (c) provide security for remediation and mitigation liabilities. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, $357 million and $599 million, respectively, of letters of credit had been issued under these facilities.

As of December 31, 2017and 2016,2021, certain other renewable projects collectively have letters of credit outstanding of $118$309 million and $106$311 million, respectively, primarily in support of the power purchase agreements and large generator interconnection agreements associated with the projects.


139
(9)
BHE Debt



(10)BHE Debt

Senior Debt


BHE senior debt represents unsecured senior obligations of BHE that are redeemable in whole or in part at any time generally with make-wholemake whole premiums. BHE senior debt consists of the following, including fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (in millions):
Par Value20222021
2.80% Senior Notes, due 2023$400 $400 $398 
3.75% Senior Notes, due 2023500 500 499 
3.50% Senior Notes, due 2025400 398 398 
4.05% Senior Notes, due 20251,250 1,245 1,246 
3.25% Senior Notes, due 2028600 594 594 
8.48% Senior Notes, due 2028256 266 260 
3.70% Senior Notes, due 20301,100 1,095 1,096 
1.65% Senior Notes, due 2031500 497 497 
6.125% Senior Bonds, due 20361,670 1,661 1,661 
5.95% Senior Bonds, due 2037550 548 548 
6.50% Senior Bonds, due 2037225 223 223 
5.15% Senior Notes, due 2043750 740 740 
4.50% Senior Notes, due 2045750 738 738 
3.80% Senior Notes, due 2048750 738 738 
4.45% Senior Notes, due 20491,000 990 990 
4.25% Senior Notes, due 2050900 889 889 
2.85% Senior Notes, due 20511,500 1,487 1,488 
4.60% Senior Notes, due 20531,000 987 — 
Total BHE Senior Debt$14,101 $13,996 $13,003 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$900 $— 
Noncurrent liabilities13,096 13,003 
Total BHE Senior Debt$13,996 $13,003 
 Par Value 2017 2016
      
1.10% Senior Notes, due 2017$
 $
 $400
5.75% Senior Notes, due 2018650
 650
 649
2.00% Senior Notes, due 2018350
 350
 349
2.40% Senior Notes, due 2020350
 349
 349
3.75% Senior Notes, due 2023500
 498
 497
3.50% Senior Notes, due 2025400
 398
 397
8.48% Senior Notes, due 2028301
 302
 477
6.125% Senior Bonds, due 20361,670
 1,660
 1,690
5.95% Senior Bonds, due 2037550
 547
 547
6.50% Senior Bonds, due 2037225
 222
 987
5.15% Senior Notes, due 2043750
 739
 739
4.50% Senior Notes, due 2045750
 737
 737
Total BHE Senior Debt$6,496
 $6,452
 $7,818
      
Reflected as:     
Current liabilities  $1,000
 $400
Noncurrent liabilities  5,452
 7,418
Total BHE Senior Debt  $6,452
 $7,818


In January 2018, BHE issued $450 million of its 2.375% Senior Notes due 2021, $400 million of its 2.800% Senior Notes due 2023, $600 million of its 3.250% Senior Notes due 2028 and $750 million of its 3.800% Senior Notes due 2048. The net proceeds were used to refinance a portion of the Company's short-term indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.

In December 2017, BHE completed a cash tender offer for a portion of its 8.48% Senior Notes due 2028, 6.50% Senior Notes due 2037 and 6.125% Senior Notes due 2036. The total pre-tax costs of the tender offer of $410 million were recorded in other, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Junior Subordinated Debentures


BHE junior subordinated debentures consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Par Value20222021
5.00% Junior subordinated debentures, due 2057100 100 100 
Total BHE junior subordinated debentures - noncurrent
$100 $100 $100 
 Par Value 2017 2016
      
Junior subordinated debentures, due 2044$
 $
 $944
Junior subordinated debentures, due 2057100
 100
 
Total BHE junior subordinated debentures - noncurrent
$100
 $100
 $944


During 2017, BHE repaid at par value a total of $944 million, plus accrued interest, of itsThe junior subordinated debentures due December 2044. Interest expense to Berkshire Hathaway for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was $16 million, $65 million and $104 million, respectively.

In June 2017, BHE issued $100 million of its 5.00% junior subordinated debentures due June 2057 in exchange for 181,819 shares of BHE no par value common stockare held by a minority shareholder. The junior subordinated debenturesshareholder and are redeemable at BHE's option at any time from and after June 15, 2037, at par plus accrued and unpaid interest. Interest expense to the minority shareholder was $5 million for each of the yearyears ended December 31, 2017 was $3 million.2022, 2021 and 2020.


140
(10)


(11)Subsidiary Debt


BHE's direct and indirect subsidiaries are organized as legal entities separate and apart from BHE and its other subsidiaries. Pursuant to separate financing agreements, substantially all of PacifiCorp's electric utility properties; the equity interest of MidAmerican Funding's subsidiary; MidAmerican Energy's electric utility properties in the state of Iowa; substantially all of Nevada Power's and Sierra Pacific's properties in the state of NevadaNevada; AltaLink's transmission properties; and substantially all of the assets of the subsidiaries of BHE Renewables that are direct or indirect owners of solarwind and windsolar generation projects are pledged or encumbered to support or otherwise provide the security for their related subsidiary debt. It should not be assumed that the assets of any subsidiary will be available to satisfy BHE's obligations or the obligations of its other subsidiaries. However, unrestricted cash or other assets which are available for distribution may, subject to applicable law, regulatory commitments and the terms of financing and ring-fencing arrangements for such parties, be advanced, loaned, paid as dividends or otherwise distributed or contributed to BHE or affiliates thereof. The long-term debt of BHE's subsidiaries may include provisions that allow BHE's subsidiaries to redeem such debt in whole or in part at any time. These provisions generally include make-whole premiums.


Distributions at these separate legal entities are limited by various covenants including, among others, leverage ratios, interest coverage ratios and debt service coverage ratios. As of December 31, 2017,2022, all subsidiaries were in compliance with their long-term debt covenants.



Long-term debt of subsidiaries consists of the following, including fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (in millions):
Par Value20222021
PacifiCorp$9,742 $9,666 $8,730 
MidAmerican Funding8,057 7,954 7,946 
NV Energy4,386 4,354 3,675 
Northern Powergrid3,085 3,054 3,287 
BHE Pipeline Group5,518 5,849 5,924 
BHE Transmission3,509 3,495 3,906 
BHE Renewables3,064 3,027 3,043 
HomeServices140 140 148 
Total subsidiary debt$37,501 $37,539 $36,659 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$2,301 $1,265 
Noncurrent liabilities35,238 35,394 
Total subsidiary debt$37,539 $36,659 

141

 Par Value 2017 2016
      
PacifiCorp$7,061
 $7,025
 $7,079
MidAmerican Funding5,319
 5,259
 4,592
NV Energy4,577
 4,581
 4,582
Northern Powergrid2,792
 2,805
 2,379
BHE Pipeline Group800
 796
 990
BHE Transmission4,348
 4,334
 4,058
BHE Renewables3,636
 3,594
 3,674
HomeServices247
 247
 
Total subsidiary debt$28,780
 $28,641
 $27,354
      
Reflected as:     
Current liabilities  $2,431
 $606
Noncurrent liabilities  26,210
 26,748
Total subsidiary debt  $28,641
 $27,354


PacifiCorp


PacifiCorp's long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
First mortgage bonds:
2.95% to 8.23%, due through 2026$1,224 $1,223 $1,377 
2.70% to 7.70%, due 2029 to 20311,100 1,095 1,094 
5.25% to 6.25%, due 2034 to 20372,050 2,042 2,042 
4.10% to 6.35%, due 2038 to 20421,250 1,239 1,238 
2.90% to 5.35%, due 2049 to 20533,900 3,849 2,761 
Variable-rate series, tax-exempt bond obligations (2022-3.75% to 4.10%; 2021-0.12% to 0.14%):
Due 202525 25 25 
Due 2024 to 2025(1)
193 193 193 
Total PacifiCorp$9,742 $9,666 $8,730 
 Par Value 2017 2016
First mortgage bonds:     
2.95% to 8.53%, due through 2022$1,875
 $1,872
 $1,872
2.95% to 8.23%, due 2023 to 20261,224
 1,218
 1,217
7.70% due 2031300
 298
 298
5.25% to 6.25%, due 2034 to 20372,050
 2,040
 2,039
4.10% to 6.35%, due 2038 to 20421,250
 1,236
 1,235
Variable-rate series, tax-exempt bond obligations (2017-1.60% to 1.87%; 2016-0.69% to 0.86%):     
Due 2018 to 202079
 79
 91
Due 2018 to 2025(1)
70
 70
 108
Due 2024(1)(2)
143
 142
 142
Due 2024 to 2025(2)
50
 50
 50
Capital lease obligations - 8.75% to 14.61%, due through 203520
 20
 27
Total PacifiCorp$7,061
 $7,025
 $7,079


(1)Supported by $216 million and $255 million of fully available letters of credit issued under committed bank arrangements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Secured by pledged first mortgage bonds registered to and held by the tax-exempt bond trustee generally with the same interest rates, maturity dates and redemption provisions as the tax-exempt bond obligations.

(1)Secured by pledged first mortgage bonds registered to and held by the tax-exempt bond trustee generally with the same interest rates, maturity dates and redemption provisions as the tax-exempt bond obligations.

The issuance of PacifiCorp's first mortgage bonds is limited by available property, earnings tests and other provisions of PacifiCorp's mortgage. Approximately $27$33 billion of PacifiCorp's eligible property (based on original cost) was subject to the lien of the mortgage as of December 31, 2017.2022.



142


MidAmerican Funding


MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt consists of the following, including fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
MidAmerican Funding:
6.927% Senior Bonds, due 2029$239 $240 $240 
Fair value adjustment— (15)(15)
MidAmerican Funding, net of fair value adjustments239 225 225 
MidAmerican Energy:
First Mortgage Bonds:
3.70%, due 2023250 250 250 
3.50%, due 2024500 500 501 
3.10%, due 2027375 374 373 
3.65%, due 2029850 859 860 
4.80%, due 2043350 347 346 
4.40%, due 2044400 395 395 
4.25%, due 2046450 446 446 
3.95%, due 2047475 471 470 
3.65%, due 2048700 689 689 
4.25%, due 2049900 875 874 
3.15%, due 2050600 592 592 
2.70%, due 2052500 492 492 
Notes:
6.75% Series, due 2031400 397 397 
5.75% Series, due 2035300 298 298 
5.80% Series, due 2036350 348 348 
Transmission upgrade obligation, 3.20% to 7.81%, due 2036 to 204248 27 22 
Tax-exempt bond obligations -
Variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligation series: (weighted average interest rate - 2022-3.83%, 2021-0.13%), due 2023-2047370 369 368 
Total MidAmerican Energy7,818 7,729 7,721 
Total MidAmerican Funding$8,057 $7,954 $7,946 
 Par Value 2017 2016
MidAmerican Funding:     
6.927% Senior Bonds, due 2029$239
 $216
 $291
      
MidAmerican Energy:     
Tax-exempt bond obligations -     
Variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligation series: (2017-1.91%, 2016-0.76%), due 2023-2047370
 368
 219
First Mortgage Bonds:     
2.40%, due 2019500
 499
 499
3.70%, due 2023250
 248
 248
3.50%, due 2024500
 501
 501
3.10%, due 2027375
 372
 
4.80%, due 2043350
 346
 345
4.40%, due 2044400
 394
 394
4.25%, due 2046450
 445
 445
3.95%, due 2047475
 470
 
Notes:     
5.95% Series, due 2017
 
 250
5.30% Series, due 2018350
 350
 350
6.75% Series, due 2031400
 396
 396
5.75% Series, due 2035300
 298
 298
5.80% Series, due 2036350
 348
 347
Transmission upgrade obligation, 4.45% and 3.42% due through 2035 and 2036, respectively
8
 6
 7
Capital lease obligations - 4.16%, due through 20202
 2
 2
Total MidAmerican Energy5,080
 5,043
 4,301
Total MidAmerican Funding$5,319
 $5,259
 $4,592

In February 2018, MidAmerican Energy issued $700 million of its 3.65% First Mortgage Bonds due August 2048.

In December 2017, MidAmerican Funding completed a cash tender offer for a portion of its 6.927% Senior Bonds. The total pre-tax costs of the tender offer of $29 million were recorded in other, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.


Pursuant to MidAmerican Energy's mortgage dated September 9, 2013, MidAmerican Energy's first mortgage bonds, currently and from time to time outstanding, are secured by a first mortgage lien on substantially all of its electric generating, transmission and distribution property within the state of Iowa, subject to certain exceptions and permitted encumbrances. AsApproximately $24 billion of December 31, 2017, MidAmerican Energy's eligible property, based on original cost, was subject to the lien of the mortgage totaled approximately $16 billion based on original cost.as of December 31, 2022. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy's senior notes outstanding are equally and ratably secured with the first mortgage bonds as required by the indentures under which the senior notes were issued.


MidAmerican Energy's variable-rate tax-exempt obligations bear interest at rates that are periodically established through remarketing of the bonds in the short-term tax-exempt market. MidAmerican Energy, at its option, may change the mode of interest calculation for these bonds by selecting from among several floating or fixed rate alternatives. The interest rates shown in the table above are the weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021. MidAmerican Energy maintains revolving credit facility agreements to provide liquidity for holders of these issues andissues. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy's obligations associated with $180 million of the variable rate, tax-exempt bondsbond obligations are secured by an equal amount of first mortgage bonds pursuant to MidAmerican Energy's mortgage dated September 9, 2013, as supplemented and amended.



143


NV Energy


NV Energy's long-term debt consists of the following, including fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
Nevada Power:
General and refunding mortgage securities:
3.700% Series CC, due 2029$500 $497 $497 
2.400% Series DD, due 2030425 422 422 
6.650% Series N, due 2036367 360 359 
6.750% Series R, due 2037349 346 346 
5.375% Series X, due 2040250 248 248 
5.450% Series Y, due 2041250 239 239 
3.125% Series EE, due 2050300 298 297 
5.900% Series GG, due 2053400 394 — 
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:
Fixed-rate series:
1.875% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017A, due 2032(1)
40 39 39 
1.650% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017, due 2036(1)
40 39 39 
1.650% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017B, due 2039(1)
13 13 13 
Variable-rate 4.821% Term Loan, due 2024(2)
300 300 — 
Total Nevada Power3,234 3,195 2,499 
Fair value adjustments— 10 11
Total Nevada Power, net of fair value adjustments3,234 3,205 2,510 
Sierra Pacific:
General and refunding mortgage securities:
3.375% Series T, due 2023250 249 249 
2.600% Series U, due 2026400 397 397 
6.750% Series P, due 2037252 254 253 
 4.710% Series W, due 2052250 248 — 
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:
Fixed-rate series:
1.850% Pollution Control Series 2016B, due 2029— — 30 
3.000% Gas and Water Series 2016B, due 2036— — 60 
0.625% Water Facilities Series 2016C, due 2036— — 30 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016D, due 2036— — 25 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016E, due 2036— — 25 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016F, due 2036— — 75 
1.850% Water Facilities Series 2016G, due 2036— — 20 
Total Sierra Pacific1,152 1,148 1,164 
Fair value adjustments— 
Total Sierra Pacific, net of fair value adjustment1,152 1,149 1,165 
Total NV Energy$4,386 $4,354 $3,675 
 Par Value 2017 2016
NV Energy -     
6.250% Senior Notes, due 2020$315
 $337
 $363
      
Nevada Power:     
General and refunding mortgage securities:     
6.500% Series O, due 2018324
 324
 324
6.500% Series S, due 2018499
 499
 498
7.125% Series V, due 2019500
 499
 499
6.650% Series N, due 2036367
 359
 357
6.750% Series R, due 2037349
 348
 345
5.375% Series X, due 2040250
 248
 247
5.450% Series Y, due 2041250
 244
 236
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:     
Fixed-rate series:     
1.800% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017A, due 2032(1)
40
 40
 
1.600% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017, due 2036(1)
40
 39
 
1.600% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017B, due 2039(1)
13
 13
 
Variable-rate series - 1.890% to 1.928%     
Pollution Control Bonds Series 2006A, due 2032
 
 38
Pollution Control Bonds Series 2006, due 2036
 
 37
Capital and financial lease obligations - 2.750% to 11.600%, due through 2054475
 475
 485
Total Nevada Power3,107
 3,088
 3,066
      
Sierra Pacific:     
General and refunding mortgage securities:     
3.375% Series T, due 2023250
 249
 248
2.600% Series U, due 2026400
 396
 395
6.750% Series P, due 2037252
 256
 255
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:     
Fixed-rate series:     
1.250% Pollution Control Series 2016A, due 2029(2)
20
 20
 20
1.500% Gas Facilities Series 2016A, due 2031(2)
59
 58
 58
3.000% Gas and Water Series 2016B, due 2036(3)
60
 63
 64
Variable-rate series (2017 - 1.690% to 1.840%, 2016 - 0.788% to 0.800%):     
Water Facilities Series 2016C, due 203630
 30
 29
Water Facilities Series 2016D, due 203625
 25
 25
Water Facilities Series 2016E, due 203625
 25
 25
Capital and financial lease obligations (2017 - 2.700% to 10.396%, 2016 - 2.700% to 10.130%), due through 205434
 34
 34
Total Sierra Pacific1,155
 1,156
 1,153
Total NV Energy$4,577
 $4,581
 $4,582


(1)    Subject to mandatory purchase by Nevada Power in May 2020March 2023 at which date the interest rate may be adjusted from time to time.adjusted.
(2)    Subject to mandatory purchase by Sierra Pacific in June 2019Amounts borrowed under the facility bear interest at which date the interestvariable rates based on SOFR or a base rate, may be adjusted from time to time.at Nevada Power's option, plus a pricing margin.
(3)    Subject to mandatory purchase by Sierra Pacific in June 2022 at which date the interest rate may be adjusted from time to time.

144


The issuance of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities by the Nevada Utilities are subject to PUCN approval and are limited by available property and other provisions of the mortgage indentures for each of Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific. As of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately $8.4$9.8 billion of Nevada Power's and $3.9$4.9 billion of Sierra Pacific's (based on original cost) property was subject to the liens of the mortgages.


Northern Powergrid


Northern Powergrid and its subsidiaries' long-term debt consists of the following, including fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value(1)
20222021
4.133% European Investment Bank loans, due 2022$— $— $204 
7.25% Bonds, due 2022— — 269 
2.50% Bonds, due 2025182 181 202 
2.073% European Investment Bank loan, due 202560 62 69 
2.564% European Investment Bank loans, due 2027302 301 337 
7.25% Bonds, due 2028224 227 254 
4.375% Bonds, due 2032182 179 200 
5.125% Bonds, due 2035242 240 268 
5.125% Bonds, due 2035182 180 201 
2.750% Bonds, due 2049182 178 200 
3.250% Bonds, due 2052423 419 — 
2.250% Bonds, due 2059363 355 398 
1.875% Bonds, due 2062363 356 398 
Variable-rate loan, due 2025(2)
163 164 — 
Variable-rate loan, due 2026(3)
217 212 287 
Total Northern Powergrid$3,085 $3,054 $3,287 

(1)The par values for these debt instruments are denominated in sterling.
(2)Amortizes quarterly and the loan is 70% floating and 30% fixed. The Company has entered into an interest rate swap that fixes the interest rate on 100% of the floating rate portion. The variable interest rate as of December 31, 2022, was 5.20% (including 2.00% margin) and the average fixed interest rate was 3.09% (including 2.00% margin).

(3)Amortizes semiannually and the Company has entered into an interest rate swap that fixes the interest rate on 80% of the outstanding debt. The variable interest rate as of December 31, 2022 was 4.98% (including 1.55% margin) and the fixed interest rate was 2.45% (including 1.55% margin), resulting in a blended rate of 2.95%.

145


 
Par Value(1)
 2017 2016
      
8.875% Bonds, due 2020$135
 $144
 $136
9.25% Bonds, due 2020270
 279
 259
3.901% to 4.586% European Investment Bank loans, due 2018 to 2022366
 366
 333
7.25% Bonds, due 2022270
 279
 257
2.50% Bonds due 2025203
 200
 182
2.073% European Investment Bank loan, due 202568
 69
 62
2.564% European Investment Bank loans, due 2027338
 336
 308
7.25% Bonds, due 2028250
 256
 234
4.375% Bonds, due 2032203
 199
 182
5.125% Bonds, due 2035270
 267
 243
5.125% Bonds, due 2035203
 200
 183
Variable-rate bond, due 2026(2)
216
 210
 
Total Northern Powergrid$2,792
 $2,805
 $2,379

(1)The par values for these debt instruments are denominated in sterling.
(2)Amortizes semiannually and the Company has entered into an interest rate swap that fixes the interest rate on 85% of the outstanding debt. The variable interest rate as of December 31, 2017 was 2.27% while the fixed interest rate was 2.82%.

BHE Pipeline Group


BHE Pipeline Group's long-term debt consists of the following, including fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
Eastern Energy Gas:
2.875% Senior Notes, due 2023$250 $250 $250 
3.55% Senior Notes, due 2023400 399 399 
2.50% Senior Notes, due 2024600 598 597 
3.60% Senior Notes, due 2024339 338 338 
3.32% Senior Notes, due 2026 (€250)(1)
268 267 283 
3.00% Senior Notes, due 2029174 173 173 
3.80% Senior Notes, due 2031150 150 150 
4.80% Senior Notes, due 204354 53 53 
4.60% Senior Notes, due 204456 56 56 
3.90% Senior Notes, due 204927 26 26 
EGTS:
3.60% Senior Notes, due 2024111 110 110 
3.00% Senior Notes, due 2029426 422 422 
4.80% Senior Notes, due 2043346 342 341 
4.60% Senior Notes, due 2044444 437 437 
3.90% Senior Notes, due 2049273 271 271 
Total Eastern Energy Gas3,918 3,892 3,906 
Fair value adjustments— 368 430 
Total Eastern Energy Gas, net of fair value adjustments3,918 4,260 4,336 
Northern Natural Gas:
5.80% Senior Bonds, due 2037150 149 149 
4.10% Senior Bonds, due 2042250 248 248 
4.30% Senior Bonds, due 2049650 652 651 
3.40% Senior Bonds, due 2051550 540 540 
Total Northern Natural Gas1,600 1,589 1,588 
Total BHE Pipeline Group$5,518 $5,849 $5,924 
 Par Value 2017 2016
Northern Natural Gas:     
5.75% Senior Notes, due 2018$200
 $200
 $199
4.25% Senior Notes, due 2021200
 199
 199
5.8% Senior Bonds, due 2037150
 149
 149
4.1% Senior Bonds, due 2042250
 248
 248
Total Northern Natural Gas800
 796
 795
      
Kern River:     
4.893% Senior Notes, due 2018
 
 195
      
Total BHE Pipeline Group$800
 $796
 $990


In April 2017, Kern River redeemed(1)    The senior notes are denominated in Euros with an outstanding principal balance of €250 million and a fixed interest rate of 1.45%. Eastern Energy Gas has entered into cross currency swaps that fix USD payments for 100% of the remaining amount of its 4.893% Senior Notes due April 2018 at a redemption price determined in accordancenotes. The fixed USD outstanding principal when combined with the terms of the indenture. The total pre-tax costs of the early redemption of $5swaps is $280 million, were recorded in other, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.with fixed interest rates at both December 31, 2022 and 2021 that averaged 3.32%.

146



BHE Transmission


BHE Transmission's long-term debt consists of the following, including fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value(1)
20222021
AltaLink Investments, L.P.:
Series 15-1 Senior Bonds, 2.244%, due 2022$— $— $158 
Total AltaLink Investments, L.P.— — 158 
AltaLink, L.P.:
Series 2012-2 Notes, 2.978%, due 2022— — 218 
Series 2013-4 Notes, 3.668%, due 2023369 369 395 
Series 2014-1 Notes, 3.399%, due 2024258 258 277 
Series 2016-1 Notes, 2.747%, due 2026258 258 276 
Series 2020-1 Notes, 1.509%, due 2030166 165 177 
Series 2022-1 Notes, 4.692%, due 2032203 202 — 
Series 2006-1 Notes, 5.249%, due 2036111 111 118 
Series 2010-1 Notes, 5.381%, due 204092 92 99 
Series 2010-2 Notes, 4.872%, due 2040111 110 118 
Series 2011-1 Notes, 4.462%, due 2041203 202 217 
Series 2012-1 Notes, 3.990%, due 2042387 383 410 
Series 2013-3 Notes, 4.922%, due 2043258 258 276 
Series 2014-3 Notes, 4.054%, due 2044218 216 232 
Series 2015-1 Notes, 4.090%, due 2045258 257 275 
Series 2016-2 Notes, 3.717%, due 2046332 330 354 
Series 2013-1 Notes, 4.446%, due 2053184 184 197 
Series 2014-2 Notes, 4.274%, due 206496 95 103 
Total AltaLink, L.P.3,504 3,490 3,742 
Other:
Construction Loan, 5.620%, due 2024
Total BHE Transmission$3,509 $3,495 $3,906 

(1)The par values for these debt instruments are denominated in Canadian dollars.

147


 
Par Value(1)
 2017 2016
AltaLink Investments, L.P.:     
Series 12-1 Senior Bonds, 3.674%, due 2019$159
 $162
 $153
Series 13-1 Senior Bonds, 3.265%, due 2020159
 161
 152
Series 15-1 Senior Bonds, 2.244%, due 2022159
 158
 148
Total AltaLink Investments, L.P.477
 481
 453
      
AltaLink, L.P.:     
Series 2008-1 Notes, 5.243%, due 2018159
 159
 148
Series 2013-2 Notes, 3.621%, due 2020100
 99
 93
Series 2012-2 Notes, 2.978%, due 2022219
 218
 204
Series 2013-4 Notes, 3.668%, due 2023398
 397
 371
Series 2014-1 Notes, 3.399%, due 2024278
 278
 260
Series 2016-1 Notes, 2.747%, due 2026278
 277
 259
Series 2006-1 Notes, 5.249%, due 2036119
 119
 111
Series 2010-1 Notes, 5.381%, due 2040100
 99
 93
Series 2010-2 Notes, 4.872%, due 2040119
 119
 111
Series 2011-1 Notes, 4.462%, due 2041219
 218
 204
Series 2012-1 Notes, 3.990%, due 2042418
 412
 385
Series 2013-3 Notes, 4.922%, due 2043278
 278
 260
Series 2014-3 Notes, 4.054%, due 2044235
 233
 218
Series 2015-1 Notes, 4.090%, due 2045278
 277
 259
Series 2016-2 Notes, 3.717%, due 2046358
 356
 333
Series 2013-1 Notes, 4.446%, due 2053199
 198
 186
Series 2014-2 Notes, 4.274%, due 2064103
 103
 97
Total AltaLink, L.P.3,858
 3,840
 3,592
      
Other:     
Construction Loan, 5.660%, due 202013
 13
 13
      
Total BHE Transmission$4,348
 $4,334
 $4,058

(1)The par values for these debt instruments are denominated in Canadian dollars.


BHE Renewables


BHE Renewables' long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
Fixed-rate(1):
Bishop Hill Holdings Senior Notes, 5.125%, due 2032$57 $56 $62 
Solar Star Funding Senior Notes, 3.950%, due 2035244 242 256 
Solar Star Funding Senior Notes, 5.375%, due 2035787 781 819 
Grande Prairie Wind Senior Notes, 3.860%, due 2037269 267 297 
Topaz Solar Farms Senior Notes, 5.750%, due 2039573 568 600 
Topaz Solar Farms Senior Notes, 4.875%, due 2039162 160 170 
Alamo 6 Senior Notes, 4.170%, due 2042190 188 197 
Other— — 
Variable-rate(1):
TX Jumbo Road Term Loan, due 2025(2)
97 96 117 
Marshall Wind Term Loan, due 2026(2)
57 56 63 
Flat Top Wind I Term Loan, due 2028(2)
102 99 113 
Mariah Del Norte Term Loan, due 2028(2)
56 54 — 
Mariah Del Norte Term Loan, due 2032(2)
142 138 — 
Pinyon Pines I and II Term Loans, due 2034(2)
328 322 344 
Total BHE Renewables$3,064 $3,027 $3,043 
 Par Value 2017 2016
Fixed-rate(1):
     
CE Generation Bonds, 7.416%, due 2018$
 $
 $67
Salton Sea Funding Corporation Bonds, 7.475%, due 2018
 
 31
Cordova Funding Corporation Bonds, 8.48% to 9.07%, due 2019
 
 97
Bishop Hill Holdings Senior Notes, 5.125%, due 203294
 93
 99
Solar Star Funding Senior Notes, 3.950%, due 2035314
 310
 311
Solar Star Funding Senior Notes, 5.375%, due 2035975
 965
 966
Grande Prairie Wind Senior Notes, 3.860%, due 2037408
 404
 414
Topaz Solar Farms Senior Notes, 5.750%, due 2039755
 745
 780
Topaz Solar Farms Senior Notes, 4.875%, due 2039219
 217
 229
Alamo 6 Senior Notes, 4.170%, due 2042232
 229
 
Other19
 19
 22
Variable-rate(1):
     
Pinyon Pines I and II Term Loans, due 2019(2)
334
 333
 355
Wailuku Special Purpose Revenue Bonds, 0.90%, due 2021
 
 7
TX Jumbo Road Term Loan, due 2025(2)
198
 193
 206
Marshall Wind Term Loan, due 2026(2)
88
 86
 90
Total BHE Renewables$3,636
 $3,594
 $3,674


(1)Amortizes quarterly or semiannually.
(1)Amortizes quarterly or semiannually.
(2)
(2)The term loans have variable interest rates based on LIBOR or SOFR plus a margin that varies during the terms of the agreements. The Company has entered into interest rate swaps that fix the interest rate on 75% of the Pinyon Pines outstanding debt and 100% of the TX Jumbo Road and Marshall Wind outstanding debt. The variable interest rate as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was 3.32% and 2.62%, respectively, while the fixed interest rates as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 ranged from 3.21% to 3.63%.

In December 2017, Wailuku River Hydroelectric Limited Partnership redeemed the remaining amount of its variable rate Special Purpose Revenue Bonds due December 2021 at a redemption price determined in accordance with the terms of the indenture.

In July 2017, Cordova Funding Corporation redeemedagreements. The Company has entered into interest rate swaps that fix the remaining amount of its 8.48% to 9.07% Series A Senior Secured Bonds due December 2019, CE Generation, LLC redeemed the remaining amount of its 7.416% Senior Secured Bonds due December 2018, and Salton Sea Funding Corporation redeemed the remaining amount of its 7.475% Senior Secured Series F Bonds due November 2018, each at redemption prices determined in accordance with the termsinterest rate on 100% of the respective indentures.

TX Jumbo Road, Marshall Wind and Pinyon Pines outstanding debt. The total pre-tax costsfixed interest rates as of the early redemptions of $15 million were recorded in other, netDecember 31, 2022 and 2021 ranged from 3.23% to 3.88%. The variable interest rate on the Consolidated StatementFlat Top Wind I and Mariah Del Norte outstanding debt was 9.82% as of Operations.December 31, 2022.


HomeServices


HomeServices' long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
Variable-rate:
Variable-rate term loan (2022 - 5.242%, 2021 - 0.950%), due 2026(1)
$140 $140 $148 

(1)Term loan amortizes quarterly and variable-rate resets monthly.

148

 Par Value 2017 2016
Variable-rate(1):
     
Variable-rate term loan, 2017 - 2.819%, due 2022$247
 $247
 $


(1)Amortizes quarterly.




Annual Repayments of Long-Term Debt


The annual repayments of BHE and subsidiary debt for the years beginning January 1, 20182023 and thereafter, excluding fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, are as follows (in millions):
2028 and
20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
BHE senior notes$900 $— $1,650 $— $— $11,551 $14,101 
BHE junior subordinated debentures— — — — — 100 100 
PacifiCorp449 591 302 100 — 8,300 9,742 
MidAmerican Funding317 538 15 378 6,806 8,057 
NV Energy250 300 — 400 — 3,436 4,386 
Northern Powergrid56 57 435 75 302 2,160 3,085 
BHE Pipeline Group650 1,050 — 268 — 3,550 5,518 
BHE Transmission368 263 — 258 — 2,620 3,509 
BHE Renewables203 210 241 218 235 1,957 3,064 
HomeServices15 108 — — 140 
Totals$3,201 $3,018 $2,658 $1,430 $915 $40,480 $51,702 

           2023 and  
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total
              
BHE senior notes$1,000
 $
 $350
 $
 $
 $5,146
 $6,496
BHE junior subordinated debentures
 
 
 
 
 100
 100
PacifiCorp588
 351
 39
 425
 606
 5,052
 7,061
MidAmerican Funding350
 501
 2
 
 
 4,466
 5,319
NV Energy844
 520
 336
 27
 28
 2,822
 4,577
Northern Powergrid66
 78
 483
 26
 501
 1,638
 2,792
BHE Pipeline Group200
 
 
 200
 
 400
 800
BHE Transmission160
 160
 269
 
 378
 3,381
 4,348
BHE Renewables209
 473
 168
 175
 172
 2,439
 3,636
HomeServices14
 20
 27
 33
 153
 
 247
Totals$3,431
 $2,103
 $1,674
 $886
 $1,838
 $25,444
 $35,376

(11)(12)Income Taxes

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act


The 2017 Tax Reform impacts many areas ofCompany's provision for income taxes has been computed on a stand-alone basis. Berkshire Hathaway includes the Company in its consolidated U.S. federal and Iowa state income tax law. The most material items includereturns and the reductionmajority of the Company's U.S. federal corporateincome tax rateis remitted to or received from 35%Berkshire Hathaway. As of December 31, 2022, the Company had a current income tax payable to 21% effective January 1, 2018, the one-time repatriationBerkshire Hathaway for federal income tax of foreign earnings$113 million. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had a current income tax receivable from Berkshire Hathaway for federal income tax of $324 million and profitsa long-term income tax receivable from Berkshire Hathaway, reflected as a component of BHE's shareholders' equity, of $744 million for Iowa state income tax. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2021 the Company generated $100 million of Iowa state net operating losses which were carried forward and limitations on bonus depreciation for utility property. GAAP requiresincreased the effect on deferredlong-term income tax assets and liabilities of a change inreceivable from Berkshire Hathaway. In July 2022, the Company amended its tax ratesallocation agreement with Berkshire Hathaway, which changed how state tax attributes will be recognized insettled with respect to state income tax returns that Berkshire Hathaway includes the period the tax rate change was enacted.Company. As a result, of the 2017 Tax Reform, the Company reduced deferredno longer expects to receive the cash benefits from the state of Iowa net operating loss carryforward previously recorded as a long-term income tax liabilities $7,115 million. As it is probable the change in deferred taxes for the Company's regulated businesses will be passed backreceivable from Berkshire Hathaway as a component of BHE's shareholders' equity, and recognized a noncash distribution of $744 million to customers through regulatory mechanisms, the Company increased net regulatory liabilities by $5,950 million. The reduction in deferred income tax liabilities also resulted in a decrease in deferred income tax expense of $1,150 million, mostly driven by the Company's non-regulated businesses, primarily BHE Renewables, BHE's investment in BYD Company Limited and HomeServices.retained earnings.

As a result of the 2017 Tax Reform, BHE's consolidated net income increased by $516 million primarily due to benefits from reductions in deferred income tax liabilities of $1,150 million, partially offset by an accrual for the deemed repatriation of undistributed foreign earnings and profits totaling $419 million and equity earnings charges totaling $228 million mainly for amounts to be returned to the customers of equity investments in regulated entities.

In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 to assist in the implementation process of the 2017 Tax Reform by allowing for calculations to be classified as provisional and subject to remeasurement. There are three different classifications for the accounting: (1) completed, (2) not complete but reasonably estimable or (3) not complete and amounts are not reasonably estimable. The Company has recorded the impacts of the 2017 Tax Reform and believes all the impacts to be complete with the exception of the repatriation tax on foreign earnings and interpretations of the bonus depreciation rules. The Company has determined the amounts recorded and the interpretations relating to these two items to be provisional and subject to remeasurement during the measurement period upon obtaining the necessary additional information to complete the accounting. The Company believes the estimates for the repatriation tax to be reasonable, however, additional time is required to validate the inputs to the foreign earnings and profits calculation, the basis on which the repatriation tax is determined, and additional guidance is required to determine state income tax implications. The Company also believes its interpretations for bonus depreciation to be reasonable, however, as the guidance is clarified estimates may change. The accounting is estimated to be completed by December 2018.



Income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current:
Federal$(1,463)$(1,701)$(1,537)
State(65)(177)(121)
Foreign79 100 86 
(1,449)(1,778)(1,572)
Deferred:
Federal(408)1,037 1,438 
State(49)(476)424 
Foreign(5)89 21 
(462)650 1,883 
Investment tax credits(5)(4)(3)
Total$(1,916)$(1,132)$308 

149

 2017 2016 2015
Current:     
Federal$(653) $(743) $(929)
State(3) 1
 29
Foreign83
 55
 84
 (573) (687) (816)
Deferred:     
Federal(76) 1,164
 1,310
State100
 (59) (53)
Foreign2
 (7) 17
 26
 1,098
 1,274
      
Investment tax credits(7) (8) (8)
Total$(554) $403
 $450


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax (benefit) expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Income tax credits(124)(27)(16)
Effects of ratemaking(16)(4)(3)
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit(6)(10)
Non-controlling interest(6)(2)— 
Income tax effect of foreign income(4)— 
Equity loss(3)(1)— 
Other, net(1)
Effective income tax rate(136)%(21)%%
 2017 2016 2015
      
Federal statutory income tax rate35 % 35 % 35 %
Income tax credits(20) (14) (11)
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit3
 (1) (1)
Effects of tax rate change and repatriation tax(31) 
 
Income tax effect of foreign income(5) (6) (7)
Equity income(2) 2
 2
Other, net(2) (2) (2)
Effective income tax rate(22)% 14 % 16 %


Effects of 2017 Tax Reform have been included in state income tax, net of federal income tax benefit, effects of tax rate change and repatriation tax and equity income.

Income tax credits relate primarily to production tax credits ("PTC") from wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities owned by MidAmerican Energy, PacifiCorp and BHE Renewables. Federal renewable electricity production tax creditsPTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities is produced and sold and are based on a per-kilowatt hour rate pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law. Wind-poweredWind- and solar-powered generating facilities are eligible for the credits for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in-service. PTCs recognized for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 totaled $1.7 billion, $1.4 billion, and $1.2 billion, respectively.


Income tax effect ofon foreign income includes, among other items, a deferred income tax benefitscharge of $16$105 million in 2016 and $39 million in 20152021, related to the enactment of reductions in the United KingdomKingdom's corporate income tax rate. In September 2016, the corporate income taxThe United Kingdom's rate is scheduled to increase from 19% to 25%, effective April 1, 2023, through legislation enacted in June 2021. The United Kingdom's rate was reducedscheduled to decrease from 18%19% to 17% effective April 1, 2020. In November 2015,2020; however, the corporate income tax rate was reduced from 20% tomaintained at 19% effective April 1, 2017, with a further reduction to 18% effective April 1,through amended legislation enacted in July 2020.

Berkshire Hathaway includes the Company in its United States federal income tax return. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had current income taxes receivable from Berkshire Hathaway of $334 million. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had current income taxes payable to Berkshire Hathaway of $27 million.



The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Deferred income tax assets:
Regulatory liabilities$1,323 $1,349 
Federal, state and foreign carryforwards812 820 
AROs283 304 
Other741 686 
Total deferred income tax assets3,159 3,159 
Valuation allowances(187)(164)
Total deferred income tax assets, net2,972 2,995 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property-related items(12,244)(11,814)
Investments(1,998)(2,877)
Regulatory assets(898)(764)
Other(510)(478)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(15,650)(15,933)
Net deferred income tax liability$(12,678)$(12,938)

150

 2017 2016
Deferred income tax assets:   
Regulatory liabilities$1,707
 $909
Federal, state and foreign carryforwards1,118
 987
AROs223
 326
Employee benefits45
 209
Derivative contracts2
 29
Other448
 707
Total deferred income tax assets3,543
 3,167
Valuation allowances(126) (64)
Total deferred income tax assets, net3,417
 3,103
    
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Property-related items(9,950) (14,237)
Investments(843) (962)
Regulatory assets(651) (1,449)
Other(215) (334)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(11,659) (16,982)
Net deferred income tax liability$(8,242) $(13,879)


The following table provides, without regard to valuation allowances, the Company's net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and expiration dates as of December 31, 20172022 (in millions):
FederalStateForeignTotal
Net operating loss carryforwards(1)
$192 $9,653 $725 $10,570 
Deferred income taxes on net operating loss carryforwards41 562 166 769 
Expiration dates2023 - indefinite2023 - indefinite2028 - 2042
Tax credits$15 $28 $— $43 
Expiration dates2023 - 20342023 - indefinite
 Federal State Foreign Total
Net operating loss carryforwards(1)
$172
 $10,813
 $605
 $11,590
Deferred income taxes on net operating loss carryforwards$37
 $858
 $163
 $1,058
Expiration dates2023-2025 2018-2037 2035-2037 

        
Tax credits$31
 $29
 $
 $60
Expiration dates2023- indefinite 2018- indefinite 
 


(1)The federal net operating loss carryforwards relate principally to net operating loss carryforwards of subsidiaries that are tax residents in both the U.S. and the United Kingdom. The federal net operating loss carryforwards were generated prior to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s ownership and began to expire in 2022.
(1)The federal net operating loss carryforwards relate principally to net operating loss carryforwards of subsidiaries that are tax residents in both the United States and the United Kingdom. The federal net operating loss carryforwards were generated prior to Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s ownership and will begin to expire in 2023.


The United StatesU.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of the Company's income tax returns through December 31, 2009. State tax agencies have closed their examinations of, or the2013. The statute of limitations has expired for the Company's income tax returns have expired for certain states through December 31, 2005,2011, and for California and Utah,other states through December 31, 20072018, except for Kansas and Minnesota, through December 31, 2008 for Illinois, through December 31, 2009 for Idaho, Montana, Nebraska and Oregon and through December 31, 2013 for Iowa.the impact of any federal audit adjustments. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, for state filings may not preclude the state from adjusting the state net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the examinationstatute of limitations is not closed.



A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the Company's net unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$97 $153 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year15 24 
Additions for tax positions of prior years— 13 
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year(12)(19)
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(23)(83)
Settlements— (1)
Interest and penalties(9)10 
Ending balance$68 $97 
 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$128
 $198
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year6
 7
Additions for tax positions of prior years70
 6
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(18) (11)
Statute of limitations(4) (1)
Settlements(1) (67)
Interest and penalties
 (4)
Ending balance$181
 $128


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Company had unrecognized tax benefits totaling $158$79 million and $104$100 million,, respectively, that if recognized, would have an impact on the effective tax rate. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions for which ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty as to the timing of such deductibility. Recognition of these tax benefits, other than applicable interest and penalties, would not affect the Company's effective income tax rate.


(12)(13)Employee Benefit Plans


Defined Benefit Plans


Domestic Operations


PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and NV Energy sponsor defined benefit pension plans that cover a majority of all employees of BHE and its domestic energy subsidiaries. These pension plans include noncontributory defined benefit pension plans, supplemental executive retirement plans ("SERP") and a restoration plan for certain executives of NV Energy.plans. PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy and NV Energy also provide certain postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits through various plans to eligible retirees.


151


Net Periodic Benefit Cost


For purposes of calculating the expected return on plan assets, a market-related value is used. The market-related value of plan assets is generally calculated by spreading the difference between expected and actual investment returns over a five-year period beginning after the first year in which they occur.


Net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the plans included the following components for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Service cost$22 $30 $17 $11 $12 $
Interest cost83 78 93 20 19 21 
Expected return on plan assets(108)(134)(140)(29)(22)(34)
Curtailment(10)— — — — — 
Settlement17 — — — — 
Net amortization19 25 32 (1)(3)(4)
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)$23 $$$$$(10)
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
            
Service cost$24
 $29
 $33
 $9
 $9
 $11
Interest cost116
 126
 121
 29
 31
 31
Expected return on plan assets(160) (160) (169) (40) (41) (45)
Net amortization25
 46
 53
 (14) (12) (11)
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)$5
 $41
 $38
 $(16) $(13) $(14)



Funded Status


The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$2,795 $2,824 $769 $744 
Employer contributions14 13 14 
Participant contributions— — 
Actual return on plan assets(491)234 (122)53 
Settlement(164)(134)— — 
Benefits paid(141)(142)(49)(51)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$2,013 $2,795 $614 $769 

152

 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$2,525
 $2,489
 $666
 $662
Employer contributions64
 78
 5
 2
Participant contributions
 
 10
 10
Actual return on plan assets390
 163
 106
 41
Settlement(15) (11) 
 
Benefits paid(203) (194) (51) (49)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$2,761
 $2,525
 $736
 $666


The following table is a reconciliation of the benefit obligations for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$2,777 $3,077 $714 $758 
Service cost22 30 11 12 
Interest cost83 78 20 19 
Participant contributions— — 
Actuarial (gain) loss(524)(132)(155)(35)
Amendment(3)— 20 
Curtailment(10)— — — 
Settlement(164)(134)— — 
Benefits paid(141)(142)(49)(51)
Benefit obligation, end of year$2,040 $2,777 $569 $714 
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$2,003 $2,713 
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$2,952
 $2,934
 $734
 $740
Service cost24
 29
 9
 9
Interest cost116
 126
 29
 31
Participant contributions
 
 10
 10
Actuarial loss (gain)132
 67
 (10) (7)
Amendment
 1
 
 
Settlement(15) (11) 
 
Benefits paid(203) (194) (51) (49)
Benefit obligation, end of year$3,006
 $2,952
 $721
 $734
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$2,988
 $2,929
    


The funded status of the plans and the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$2,013 $2,795 $614 $769 
Benefit obligation, end of year2,040 2,777 569 714 
Funded status$(27)$18 $45 $55 
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Other assets$125 $204 $52 $60 
Other current liabilities(13)(13)— — 
Other long-term liabilities(139)(173)(7)(5)
Amounts recognized$(27)$18 $45 $55 
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$2,761
 $2,525
 $736
 $666
Benefit obligation, end of year3,006
 2,952
 721
 734
Funded status$(245) $(427) $15
 $(68)
        
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:       
Other assets$66
 $26
 $32
 $19
Other current liabilities(14) (15) 
 
Other long-term liabilities(297) (438) (17) (87)
Amounts recognized$(245) $(427) $15
 $(68)



The SERPs and restoration plan have no plan assets; however, the Company has Rabbi trusts that hold corporate-owned life insurance and other investments to provide funding for the future cash requirements of the SERPs and restoration plan. The cash surrender value of all of the policies included in the Rabbi trusts, net of amounts borrowed against the cash surrender value, plus the fair market value of other Rabbi trust investments, was $272$300 million and $242$343 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. These assets are not included in the plan assets in the above table, but are reflected in noncurrent investments and restricted cash and investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


153


The fair value of plan assets, projected benefit obligation and accumulated benefit obligation for (1) pension and other postretirement benefit plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of the fair value of plan assets and (2) pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of the fair value of plan assets as of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Fair value of plan assets$490 $— $240 $137 
Projected benefit obligation$643 $186 $247 $142 
Fair value of plan assets$— $— 
Accumulated benefit obligation$142 $185 
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Fair value of plan assets$2,016
 $1,841
 $126
 $413
        
Projected benefit obligation$2,327
 $2,294
 $143
 $500
        
Accumulated benefit obligation$2,316
 $2,278
    


Unrecognized Amounts


The portion of the funded status of the plans not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost as of December 31 is as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Net loss (gain)$365 $343 $(38)$(34)
Prior service (credit) cost(4)(1)21 (1)
Regulatory deferrals29 11 
Total$390 $353 $(16)$(33)
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Net loss$649
 $775
 $14
 $88
Prior service credit(3) (7) (37) (52)
Regulatory deferrals(4) (7) 7
 7
Total$642
 $761
 $(16) $43


A reconciliation of the amounts not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 is as follows (in millions):
Accumulated
Other
RegulatoryRegulatoryComprehensive
AssetLiabilityLossTotal
Pension
Balance, December 31, 2020$600 $(20)$33 $613 
Net gain arising during the year(177)(44)(10)(231)
Settlement(9)— (4)
Net amortization(24)— (1)(25)
Total(210)(39)(11)(260)
Balance, December 31, 2021390 (59)22 353 
Net loss (gain) arising during the year58 38 (20)76 
Net prior service credit arising during the year— (3)— (3)
Settlement(13)(4)— (17)
Net amortization(17)— (2)(19)
Total28 31 (22)37 
Balance, December 31, 2022$418 $(28)$— $390 

154


Accumulated
    Accumulated  Other
    Other  RegulatoryRegulatoryComprehensive
Regulatory Regulatory Comprehensive  AssetLiabilityLossTotal
Asset Liability Loss Total
Pension       
Balance, December 31, 2015$729
 $(1) $13
 $741
Other PostretirementOther Postretirement
Balance, December 31, 2020Balance, December 31, 2020$47 $(23)$$28 
Net gain arising during the yearNet gain arising during the year(40)(22)(3)(65)
Net prior service cost arising during the yearNet prior service cost arising during the year— — 
Net amortizationNet amortization— — 
TotalTotal(36)(22)(3)(61)
Balance, December 31, 2021Balance, December 31, 202111 (45)(33)
Net loss (gain) arising during the year76
 (11) 
 65
Net loss (gain) arising during the year20 (20)(4)(4)
Net prior service cost arising during the year1
 
 
 1
Net prior service cost arising during the year11 20 
Net amortization(45) (1) 
 (46)Net amortization(2)— 
Total32
 (12) 
 20
Total34 (14)(3)17 
Balance, December 31, 2016761
 (13) 13
 761
Net (gain) loss arising during the year(68) (29) 3
 (94)
Net amortization(28) (1) 4
 (25)
Total(96) (30) 7
 (119)
Balance, December 31, 2017$665
 $(43) $20
 $642
Balance, December 31, 2022Balance, December 31, 2022$45 $(59)$(2)$(16)



 Regulatory Regulatory  
 Asset Liability Total
Other Postretirement     
Balance, December 31, 2015$49
 $(12) $37
Net gain arising during the year(5) (1) (6)
Net amortization11
 1
 12
Total6
 
 6
Balance, December 31, 201655
 (12) 43
Net gain arising during the year(52) (21) (73)
Net amortization7
 7
 14
Total(45) (14) (59)
Balance, December 31, 2017$10
 $(26) $(16)

The net loss, prior service credit and regulatory deferrals that will be amortized in 2018 into net periodic benefit cost are estimated to be as follows (in millions):
 Net Prior Service Regulatory  
 Loss Credit Deferrals Total
        
Pension$32
 $(1) $(3) $28
Other postretirement1
 (15) 1
 (13)
Total$33
 $(16) $(2) $15

Plan Assumptions


Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost were as follows:

PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Benefit obligations as of December 31:
Discount rate5.65 %2.98 %2.60 %4.54 %2.95 %2.59 %
Rate of compensation increase3.00 %2.75 %2.75 %N/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan
2020N/AN/A2.44 %N/AN/AN/A
2021N/A2.45 %2.25 %N/AN/AN/A
20223.25 %2.56 %2.25 %N/AN/AN/A
20234.25 %2.56 %2.65 %N/AN/AN/A
20244.25 %2.83 %2.65 %N/AN/AN/A
2025 and beyond3.65 %2.83 %2.65 %N/AN/AN/A
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Discount rate2.98 %2.60 %3.32 %2.95 %2.59 %3.24 %
Expected return on plan assets4.30 %5.39 %5.94 %4.20 %3.35 %5.42 %
Rate of compensation increase2.75 %2.75 %2.75 %N/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rate for cash balance plan3.25 %2.45 %2.44 %N/AN/AN/A
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
            
Benefit obligations as of December 31:           
Discount rate3.60% 4.06% 4.43% 3.57% 4.01% 4.33%
Rate of compensation increase2.75% 2.75% 2.75% NA
 NA
 NA
            
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:           
Discount rate4.06% 4.43% 4.00% 4.01% 4.33% 3.93%
Expected return on plan assets6.55% 6.78% 6.88% 6.73% 7.03% 7.00%
Rate of compensation increase2.75% 2.75% 2.75% NA
 NA
 NA


In establishing its assumption as to the expected return on plan assets, the Company utilizes the asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets.
155


2017 201620222021
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates as of December 31:   Assumed healthcare cost trend rates as of December 31:
Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year7.10% 7.40%Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year6.50 %6.00 %
Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to5.00% 5.00%Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to5.00 %5.00 %
Year that the rate reaches the rate it is assumed to remain at2025 2025Year that the rate reaches the rate it is assumed to remain at20282025



A one percentage-point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects (in millions):
 One Percentage-Point
 Increase Decrease
Increase (decrease) in:   
Total service and interest cost for the year ended December 31, 2017$
 $
Other postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 20174
 (4)

Contributions and Benefit Payments


Employer contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are expected to be $39$13 million and $3$7 million, respectively, during 2018.2023. Funding to the established pension trusts is based upon the actuarially determined costs of the plans and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code,IRC, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Pension Protection Act of 2006, as amended. The Company considers contributing additional amounts from time to time in order to achieve certain funding levels specified under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, as amended. The Company's funding policy forCompany evaluates a variety of factors, including funded status, income tax laws and regulatory requirements, in determining contributions to its other postretirement benefit plans is to generally contribute an amount equal to the net periodic benefit cost.plans.


The expected benefit payments to participants in the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plans for 20182023 through 20222027 and for the five years thereafter are summarized below (in millions):
Projected Benefit
Payments
Other
PensionPostretirement
2023$192 $53 
2024184 53 
2025180 53 
2026177 52 
2027172 52 
2028-2032782 235 
 Projected Benefit
 Payments
   Other
 Pension Postretirement
    
2018$226
 $54
2019224
 55
2020224
 57
2021222
 55
2022214
 54
2023-2027979
 243


Plan Assets


Investment Policy and Asset Allocations


The Company's investment policy for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans is to balance risk and return through a diversified portfolio of debt securities, equity securities and other alternative investments. Maturities for debt securities are managed to targets consistent with prudent risk tolerances. The plans retain outside investment advisorsconsultants to manageadvise on plan investments within the parameters outlined by each plan's Pension and Employee Benefits Plans Administrativethe Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company Investment Committee. The investment portfolio is managed in line with the investment policy with sufficient liquidity to meet near-term benefit payments.



156


The target allocations (percentage of plan assets) for the Company's pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets are as follows as of December 31, 2017:2022:
Other
PensionPostretirement
%%
PacifiCorp:
Debt securities(1)
7377
Equity securities(1)
2223
Limited partnership interests50
MidAmerican Energy:
Debt securities(1)
40-7020-40
Equity securities(1)
35-6060-80
Other0-150-5
NV Energy:
Debt securities(1)
65-8068-89
Equity securities(1)
20-3511-32

(1)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds are allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.

157

Other
PensionPostretirement
%%
PacifiCorp:
Debt securities(1)

33-3833-37
Equity securities(1)
49-6061-65
Limited partnership interests7-121-3
Other0-10-1
MidAmerican Energy:
Debt securities(1)
20-5025-45
Equity securities(1)
60-8045-80
Real estate funds2-8
Other0-30-5
NV Energy:
Debt securities(1)
53-7740
Equity securities(1)
23-4760

(1)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds are allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.


Fair Value Measurements


The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for the Company's defined benefit pension plans (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
Level 1Level 2Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash equivalents$— $51 $51 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations109 — 109 
Corporate obligations— 613 613 
Municipal obligations— 43 43 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 81 81 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies198 — 198 
International companies— 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$308 $788 1,096 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
885 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
32 
Total assets measured at fair value$2,013 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash equivalents$— $64 $64 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations142 — 142 
Corporate obligations— 912 912 
Municipal obligations— 66 66 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 93 93 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies135 — 135 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$277 $1,135 1,412 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
1,349 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
34 
Total assets measured at fair value$2,795 

(1)Refer to Note 15 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 53% and 47%, respectively, for 2022 and 54% and 46%, respectively, for 2021. Additionally, these funds are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 95% and 5%, respectively, for 2022 and 89% and 11%, respectively, for 2021.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.
158

 
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
As of December 31, 2017:       
Cash equivalents$10
 $76
 $
 $86
Debt securities:       
United States government obligations218
 
 
 218
Corporate obligations
 350
 
 350
Municipal obligations
 16
 
 16
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 110
 
 110
Equity securities:       
United States companies622
 
 
 622
International companies136
 
 
 136
Investment funds(2)
83
 20
 
 103
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$1,069
 $572
 $
 1,641
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
      1,019
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
      63
Real estate funds measured at net asset value      38
Total assets measured at fair value      $2,761
        
As of December 31, 2016:       
Cash equivalents$4
 $54
 $
 $58
Debt securities:       
United States government obligations161
 
 
 161
International government obligations
 2
 
 2
Corporate obligations
 295
 
 295
Municipal obligations
 20
 
 20
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 112
 
 112
Equity securities:       
United States companies583
 
 
 583
International companies117
 
 
 117
Investment funds(2)
146
 
 
 146
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$1,011
 $483
 $
 1,494
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
      920
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
      61
Real estate funds measured at net asset value      50
Total assets measured at fair value      $2,525


(1)Refer to Note 15 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 62% and 38%, respectively, for both 2017 and 2016. Additionally, these funds are invested in United States and international securities of approximately 68% and 32%, respectively, for 2017 and 60% and 40%, respectively, for 2016.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.

The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for the Company's defined benefit other postretirement plans (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
Level 1Level 2Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash equivalents$15 $$24 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations— 
Corporate obligations— 52 52 
Municipal obligations— 35 35 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 49 49 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies— 
Investment funds(2)
307 — 307 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$337 $145 482 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
132 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
— 
Total assets measured at fair value$614 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash equivalents$12 $$16 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations27 — 27 
Corporate obligations— 85 85 
Municipal obligations— 43 43 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 38 38 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies— 
Investment funds(2)
394 — 394 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$437 $170 607 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
161 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
Total assets measured at fair value$769 
 
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
As of December 31, 2017:       
Cash equivalents$11
 $3
 $
 $14
Debt securities:       
United States government obligations20
 
 ��
 20
Corporate obligations
 36
 
 36
Municipal obligations
 46
 
 46
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 29
 
 29
Equity securities:       
United States companies185
 
 
 185
International companies8
 
 
 8
Investment funds219
 1
 
 220
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$443
 $115
 $
 558
Investment funds measured at net asset value      174
Limited partnership interests measured at net asset value      4
Total assets measured at fair value      $736
        
As of December 31, 2016:       
Cash equivalents$18
 $2
 $
 $20
Debt securities:       
United States government obligations19
 
 
 19
Corporate obligations
 29
 
 29
Municipal obligations
 39
 
 39
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 25
 
 25
Equity securities:       
United States companies217
 
 
 217
International companies5
 
 
 5
Investment funds(2)
152
 
 
 152
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$411
 $95
 $
 506
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
      156
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
      4
Total assets measured at fair value      $666


(1)Refer to Note 15 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(1)Refer to Note 15 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 68% and 32%, respectively, for 2017 and 63% and 37%, respectively, for 2016. Additionally, these funds are invested in United States and international securities of approximately 73% and 27%, respectively, for 2017 and 72% and 28%, respectively, for 2016.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.

(2)Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 55% and 45%, respectively, for 2022 and 55% and 45%, respectively, for 2021. Additionally, these funds are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 88% and 12%, respectively, for 2022 and 88% and 12%, respectively, for 2021.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.

For level 1 investments, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value. For level 2 investments, the fair value is determined using pricing models based on observable market inputs. Shares of mutual funds not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, private equity limited partnership interests, common and commingled trust funds and investment entities are reported at fair value based on the net asset value per unit, which is used for expedience purposes. A fund's net asset value is based on the fair value of the underlying assets held by the fund less its liabilities.



159


Foreign Operations


Certain wholly-owned subsidiaries of Northern Powergrid participate in the Northern Powergrid group of the United Kingdom industry-wide Electricity Supply Pension Scheme (the "UK Plan"), which provides pension and other related defined benefits, based on final pensionable pay, to the majority of the employees of Northern Powergrid. The UK Plan is closed to employees hired after July 23, 1997. Employees hired after that date are covered by a defined contribution plan sponsored by a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northern Powergrid.


Net Periodic Benefit Cost


For purposes of calculating the expected return on pension plan assets, a market-related value is used. The market-related value of plan assets is calculated by spreadingincluding the difference between expected and actual investment returns over a five-year period beginning after the first year in which they occur.


Net periodic benefit (credit) cost for the UK Plan included the following components for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
2017 2016 2015

202220212020
     
Service cost$23
 $20
 $24
Service cost$14 $16 $16 
Interest cost58
 72
 79
Interest cost35 31 40 
Expected return on plan assets(100) (110) (116)Expected return on plan assets(92)(111)(101)
Settlement31
 
 
Settlement— 10 17 
Net amortization63
 44
 62
Net amortization24 55 43 
Net periodic benefit cost$75
 $26
 $49
Net periodic benefit (credit) costNet periodic benefit (credit) cost$(19)$$15 
    
Funded Status


The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$2,363 $2,334 
Employer contributions15 28 
Participant contributions
Actual return on plan assets(671)148 
Settlement— (51)
Benefits paid(109)(72)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes(236)(25)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$1,363 $2,363 

160

 2017 2016
    
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$2,169
 $2,276
Employer contributions58
 55
Participant contributions1
 1
Actual return on plan assets145
 349
Settlement(144) 
Benefits paid(68) (115)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes207
 (397)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$2,368
 $2,169



The following table is a reconciliation of the benefit obligation for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$2,003 $2,205 
Service cost14 16 
Interest cost35 31 
Participant contributions
Actuarial gain(596)(105)
Settlement— (51)
Amendment27 — 
Benefits paid(109)(72)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes(200)(22)
Benefit obligation, end of year$1,175 $2,003 
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$1,060 $1,778 
 2017 2016
    
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$2,125
 $2,142
Service cost23
 20
Interest cost58
 72
Participant contributions1
 1
Actuarial loss (gain)(4) 387
Settlement(131) 
Benefits paid(68) (115)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes197
 (382)
Benefit obligation, end of year$2,201
 $2,125
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$1,933
 $1,858


The funded status of the UK Plan and the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
20222021
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$1,363 $2,363 
Benefit obligation, end of year1,175 2,003 
Funded status$188 $360 
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Other assets$188 $360 
 2017 2016
    
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$2,368
 $2,169
Benefit obligation, end of year2,201
 2,125
Funded status$167
 $44
    
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:   
Other assets$167
 $44


Unrecognized Amounts


The portion of the funded status of the UK Plan not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost as of December 31 is as follows (in millions):
20222021
Net loss$499 $400 
Prior service cost30 
Total$529 $405 

161

 2017 2016
    
Net loss$510
 $590


A reconciliation of the amounts not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost, which are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
20222021
Balance, beginning of year$405 $618 
Net loss (gain) arising during the year167 (143)
Net prior service cost arising during the year27 — 
Settlement— (10)
Net amortization(24)(55)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes(46)(5)
Total124 (213)
Balance, end of year$529 $405 
 2017 2016
    
Balance, beginning of year$590
 $592
Net (gain) loss arising during the year(50) 148
Settlement(17) 
Net amortization(63) (44)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes50
 (106)
Total(80) (2)
Balance, end of year$510
 $590


The net loss that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss in 2018 into net periodic benefit cost is estimated to be $60 million.

Plan Assumptions

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
2017 2016 2015202220212020
     
Benefit obligations as of December 31:     Benefit obligations as of December 31:
Discount rate2.60% 2.70% 3.70%Discount rate4.80 %1.95 %1.40 %
Rate of compensation increase3.45% 3.00% 2.90%Rate of compensation increase3.20 %3.45 %3.05 %
Rate of future price inflation2.95% 3.00% 2.90%Rate of future price inflation2.95 %2.95 %2.55 %
     
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:     Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Discount rate2.70% 3.70% 3.60%Discount rate1.95 %1.40 %2.10 %
Expected return on plan assets5.00% 5.60% 5.60%Expected return on plan assets4.40 %4.85 %5.00 %
Rate of compensation increase3.00% 2.90% 2.80%Rate of compensation increase3.45 %3.05 %3.30 %
Rate of future price inflation3.00% 2.90% 2.80%Rate of future price inflation2.95 %2.55 %2.80 %
    
Contributions and Benefit Payments


Employer contributions to the UK Plan are expected to be £45£11 million during 2018.2023. The expected benefit payments to participants in the UK Plan for 20182023 through 20222027 and for the five years thereafter, excluding lump sum settlement elections and using the foreign currency exchange rate as of December 31, 2017,2022, are summarized below (in millions):
2023$67 
202469 
202570 
202672 
202774 
2028-2032398 
162

2018$72
201974
202075
202177
202279
2023-2027427

Plan Assets


Investment Policy and Asset Allocations


The investment policy for the UK Plan is to balance risk and return through a diversified portfolio of debt securities, equity securities, real estate and other asset classes. Maturities for debt securities are managed to targets consistent with prudent risk tolerances. The UK Plan retains outside investment advisors to manage plan investments within the parameters set by the trustees of the UK Plan in consultation with Northern Powergrid. The investment portfolio is managed in line with the investment policy with sufficient liquidity to meet near-term benefit payments. The return on assets assumption is based on a weighted-average of the expected historical performance for the types of assets in which the UK Plan invests.


The target allocations (percentage of plan assets) for the UK Plan assets are as follows as of December 31, 2017:
2022:
%
Debt securities(1)
50-5560-70
Equity securities(1)
35-4010-20
Real estate funds and other5-1515-25

(1)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds have been allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.



(1)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds have been allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.

Fair Value Measurements


The following table presents the fair value of the UK Plan assets, by major category (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash equivalents$$29 $— $30 
Debt securities:
United Kingdom government obligations711 — — 711 
Equity securities:
Investment funds(2)
— 312 — 312 
Real estate funds— — 214 214 
Total$712 $341 $214 1,267 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
96 
Total assets measured at fair value$1,363 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash equivalents$$27 $— $32 
Debt securities:
United Kingdom government obligations1,308 — — 1,308 
Equity securities:
Investment funds(2)
— 646 — 646 
Real estate funds— — 269 269 
Total$1,313 $673 $269 2,255 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
108 
Total assets measured at fair value$2,363 

(1)Refer to Note 15 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 25% and 75%, respectively, for 2022 and 23% and 77%, respectively, for 2021.

163

 
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
As of December 31, 2017:       
Cash equivalents$4
 $30
 $
 $34
Debt securities:       
United Kingdom government obligations870
 
 
 870
Equity securities:       
Investment funds(2)

 1,027
 
 1,027
Real estate funds
 
 230
 230
Total$874
 $1,057
 $230
 2,161
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
      207
Total assets measured at fair value      $2,368
        
As of December 31, 2016:       
Cash equivalents$4
 $83
 $
 $87
Debt securities:       
United Kingdom government obligations718
 
 
 718
Equity securities:       
Investment funds(2)

 1,095
 
 1,095
Real estate funds
 
 105
 105
Total$722
 $1,178
 $105
 2,005
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
      164
Total assets measured at fair value      $2,169


(1)Refer to Note 15 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 21% and 79%, respectively, for 2017 and 44% and 56%, respectively, for 2016.

The fair value of the UK Plan's assets are determined similar to the plan assets of the domestic plans as previously discussed.


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the UK Plan assets measured at fair valueusing significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
Real Estate Funds
202220212020
Beginning balance$269 $237 $243 
Actual return on plan assets still held at period end(27)35 (13)
Foreign currency exchange rate changes(28)(3)
Ending balance$214 $269 $237 
 Real Estate Funds
 2017 2016 2015
     
Beginning balance$105
 $204
 $199
Actual return on plan assets still held at period end6
 10
 18
Purchases (sales)104
 (80) 
Foreign currency exchange rate changes15
 (29) (13)
Ending balance$230
 $105
 $204



Defined Contribution Plans


The Company sponsors various defined contribution plans covering substantially all employees. The Company's contributions vary depending on the plan, but matching contributions are based on each participant's level of contribution, and certain participants receive contributions based on eligible pre-tax annual compensation. Contributions cannot exceed the maximum allowable for tax purposes. The Company's contributions to these plans were $103$159 million,, $102 $137 million and $90$127 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


(13)
Asset Retirement Obligations

(14)Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.


The Company does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $2.3$2.6 billion and $2.2$2.4 billion as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.


The following table presents the Company's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Quad Cities Station$417 $427 
Fossil-fueled generating facilities396 466 
Wind-powered generating facilities353 299 
Solar-powered generating facilities30 25 
Offshore pipeline facilities14 14 
Other118 109 
Total asset retirement obligations$1,328 $1,340 
Quad Cities Station nuclear decommissioning trust funds$664 $768 

164

 2017 2016
    
Fossil fuel facilities$380
 $404
Quad Cities Station342
 343
Wind generating facilities138
 124
Offshore pipeline facilities32
 33
Solar generating facilities19
 12
Other43
 38
Total asset retirement obligations$954
 $954
    
Quad Cities Station nuclear decommissioning trust funds$515
 $460


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company's ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$1,340 $1,341 
Change in estimated costs81 
Acquisitions29 — 
Additions32 15 
Retirements(122)(144)
Accretion47 47 
Ending balance$1,328 $1,340 
Reflected as:
Other current liabilities$76 $130 
Other long-term liabilities1,252 1,210 
Total ARO liability$1,328 $1,340 
 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$954
 $921
Change in estimated costs(18) 33
Additions21
 25
Retirements(45) (63)
Accretion42
 38
Ending balance$954
 $954
    
Reflected as:   
Other current liabilities$60
 $98
Other long-term liabilities894
 856
Total ARO liability$954
 $954



The Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulates the decommissioning of nuclear power plants,generating facilities, which includes the planning and funding for the decommissioning. In accordance with these regulations, MidAmerican Energy submits a biennial report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission providing reasonable assurance that funds will be available to pay for its share of the Quad Cities Station decommissioning.


Certain of the Company's decommissioning and reclamation obligations relate to jointly owned facilities and mine sites, and as such, each subsidiary is committed to pay a proportionate share of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, the respective subsidiary may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. The Company's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities.


The changes in estimated costs for 2017 and 2016 were primarily due to new decommissioning studies conducted by the operator of the Quad Cities Station that changed the estimated amount and timing of cash flows.

(14)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

The Company is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk primarily through BHE's ownership of PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Energy, Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific (collectively, the "Utilities") as they have an obligation to serve retail customer load in their regulated service territories. The Company also provides nonregulated retail electricity and natural gas services in competitive markets. The Utilities' load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage and transmission and transportation constraints. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate short- and long-term debt, future debt issuances and mortgage commitments. Additionally, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk from its business operations and investments in Great Britain and Canada. The Company does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities.

Each of the Company's business platforms has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, monitor and report each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, the Company uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. The Company manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, the Company may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, forward sale commitments or mortgage interest rate lock commitments, to mitigate the Company's exposure to interest rate risk. The Company does not hedge all of its commodity price, interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in the Company's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2, 6 and 15 for additional information on derivative contracts.


The following table, which reflects master netting arrangements and excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases or normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair value of the Company's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts to the amounts presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
 Other   Other Other  
 Current Other Current Long-term  
 Assets Assets Liabilities Liabilities Total
As of December 31, 2017:         
Not designated as hedging contracts:         
Commodity assets(1)
$29
 $92
 $6
 $4
 $131
Commodity liabilities(1)
(6) 
 (64) (93) (163)
Interest rate assets16
 
 
 
 16
Interest rate liabilities
 
 (1) (7) (8)
Total39
 92
 (59) (96) (24)
          
Designated as hedging contracts:         
Commodity assets4
 9
 2
 1
 16
Commodity liabilities(3) (7) (3) (4) (17)
Interest rate assets
 8
 
 
 8
Interest rate liabilities
 
 
 
 
Total1
 10
 (1) (3) 7
          
Total derivatives40
 102
 (60) (99) (17)
Cash collateral receivable
 
 18
 58
 76
Total derivatives - net basis$40
 $102
 $(42) $(41) $59

As of December 31, 2016:         
Not designated as hedging contracts:         
Commodity assets(1)
$42
 $86
 $5
 $2
 $135
Commodity liabilities(1)
(10) 
 (46) (150) (206)
Interest rate assets15
 
 
 
 15
Interest rate liabilities
 
 (4) (6) (10)
Total47
 86
 (45) (154) (66)
          
Designated as hedging contracts:         
Commodity assets1
 
 2
 3
 6
Commodity liabilities
 
 (14) (8) (22)
Interest rate assets
 8
 
 
 8
Interest rate liabilities
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Total1
 8
 (15) (5) (11)
          
Total derivatives48
 94
 (60) (159) (77)
Cash collateral receivable
 
 13
 61
 74
Total derivatives - net basis$48
 $94
 $(47) $(98) $(3)


(1)
The Company's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are generally included in regulated rates, and as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, a net regulatory asset of $119 million and $148 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $32 million and $71 million, respectively. The difference between the net regulatory asset and the net derivative liability relates primarily to a power purchase agreement derivative at BHE Renewables.

Not Designated as Hedging Contracts

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company's net regulatory assets and summarizes the pre-tax gains and losses on commodity derivative contracts recognized in net regulatory assets, as well as amounts reclassified to earnings for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 Commodity Derivatives
 2017 2016 2015
      
Beginning balance$148
 $250
 $223
Changes in fair value recognized in net regulatory assets53
 (30) 128
Net gains (losses) reclassified to operating revenue10
 (5) 1
Net losses reclassified to cost of sales(92) (67) (102)
Ending balance$119
 $148
 $250

Designated as Hedging Contracts

The Company uses commodity derivative contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges to hedge electricity and natural gas commodity prices for delivery to nonregulated customers and other transactions. Certain commodity derivative contracts have settled and the fair value at the date of settlement remains in AOCI and is recognized in earnings when the forecasted transactions impact earnings. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company's AOCI (pre-tax) and summarizes pre-tax gains and losses on commodity derivative contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges recognized in OCI, as well as amounts reclassified to earnings for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 Commodity Derivatives
 2017 2016 2015
      
Beginning balance$16
 $46
 $32
Changes in fair value recognized in OCI15
 26
 52
Net gains reclassified to operating revenue1
 1
 9
Net losses reclassified to cost of sales(32) (57) (47)
Ending balance$
 $16
 $46

Realized gains and losses on hedges and hedge ineffectiveness are recognized in income as operating revenue, cost of sales, operating expense or interest expense depending upon the nature of the item being hedged. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, hedge ineffectiveness was insignificant. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had cash flow hedges with expiration dates extending through June 2026.


Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
 Unit of    
 Measure 2017 2016
Electricity purchasesMegawatt hours 4
 5
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms 310
 271
Fuel purchasesGallons 
 11
Interest rate swapsUS$ 679
 714
Interest rate swaps£ 136
 
Mortgage commitments, netUS$ (422) (309)

Credit Risk

The Utilities are exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent the Utilities' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, the Utilities analyze the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establish limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluate the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, the Utilities enter into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, the Utilities exercise rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale derivative contracts contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These derivative contracts may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2017, the applicable credit ratings from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

The aggregate fair value of the Company's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $145 million and $190 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for which the Company had posted collateral of $74 million and $69 million, respectively, in the form of cash deposits. If all credit-risk-related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company would have been required to post $56 million and $110 million, respectively, of additional collateral. The Company's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors.


(15)Fair Value Measurements


The carrying value of the Company's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Financial Statements using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:


Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect the Company's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. The Company develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.


165


The following table presents the Company's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3
Other(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$$614 $51 $(194)$477 
Interest rate derivatives50 54 — 112 
Mortgage loans held for sale— 474 — — 474 
Money market mutual funds1,178 — — — 1,178 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations2,146 — — — 2,146 
International government obligations— — — 
Corporate obligations— 70 — — 70 
Municipal obligations— — — 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— — — 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies360 — — — 360 
International companies3,771 — — — 3,771 
Investment funds231 — — — 231 
$7,742 $1,217 $59 $(194)$8,824 
Liabilities:
Commodity derivatives$(8)$(206)$(110)$106 $(218)
Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives— (21)— — (21)
Interest rate derivatives— (2)(2)(3)
$(8)$(229)$(112)$107 $(242)

166


Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements    Level 1Level 2Level 3
Other(1)
Total
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Other(1)
 Total
As of December 31, 2017:         
As of December 31, 2021:As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:         Assets:
Commodity derivatives$1
 $42
 $104
 $(29) $118
Commodity derivatives$$271 $73 $(47)$302 
Foreign currency exchange rate derivativesForeign currency exchange rate derivatives— — — 
Interest rate derivatives
 15
 9
 
 24
Interest rate derivatives20 — 24 
Mortgage loans held for sale
 465
 
 
 465
Mortgage loans held for sale— 1,263 — — 1,263 
Money market mutual funds(2)
685
 
 
 
 685
554 — — — 554 
Debt securities:         Debt securities:
United States government obligations176
 
 
 
 176
U.S. government obligationsU.S. government obligations232 — — — 232 
International government obligations
 5
 
 
 5
International government obligations— — — 
Corporate obligations
 36
 
 
 36
Corporate obligations— 90 — — 90 
Municipal obligations
 2
 
 
 2
Municipal obligations— — — 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligationsAgency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— — — 
Equity securities:         Equity securities:
United States companies288
 
 
 
 288
U.S. companiesU.S. companies428 — — — 428 
International companies1,968
 
 
 
 1,968
International companies7,703 — — — 7,703 
Investment funds178
 
 
 
 178
Investment funds237 — — — 237 
$3,296
 $565
 $113
 $(29) $3,945
$9,160 $1,637 $93 $(47)$10,843 
Liabilities:         Liabilities:
Commodity derivatives$(3) $(167) $(10) $105
 $(75)Commodity derivatives$(2)$(113)$(224)$73 $(266)
Foreign currency exchange rate derivativesForeign currency exchange rate derivatives— (3)— — (3)
Interest rate derivatives
 (8) 
 
 (8)Interest rate derivatives— (7)(1)— (8)
$(3) $(175) $(10) $105
 $(83)$(2)$(123)$(225)$73 $(277)

(1)Represents netting under master netting arrangements and a net cash collateral payable of $87 million and receivable of $26 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

As of December 31, 2016:         
Assets:         
Commodity derivatives$5
 $49
 $87
 $(22) $119
Interest rate derivatives
 16
 7
 
 23
Mortgage loans held for sale
 359
 
 
 359
Money market mutual funds(2)
586
 
 
 
 586
Debt securities:         
United States government obligations161
 
 
 
 161
International government obligations
 3
 
 
 3
Corporate obligations
 36
 
 
 36
Municipal obligations
 2
 
 
 2
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 2
 
 
 2
Equity securities:         
United States companies250
 
 
 
 250
International companies1,190
 
 
 
 1,190
Investment funds147
 
 
 
 147
 $2,339
 $467
 $94
 $(22) $2,878
Liabilities:         
Commodity derivatives$(2) $(199) $(27) $96
 $(132)
Interest rate derivatives(1) (11) (1) 
 (13)
 $(3) $(210) $(28) $96
 $(145)

(1)
Represents netting under master netting arrangements and a net cash collateral receivable of $76 million and $74 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Amounts are included in cash and cash equivalents; other current assets; and noncurrent investments and restricted cash and investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of these money market mutual funds approximates cost.


Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which the Company transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, the Company uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent the Company's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. The Company bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations, when available, or internally developed and commercial models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations are obtained from independent brokers, exchanges, direct communication with market participants and actual transactions executed by the Company. Market price quotations are generally readily obtainable for the applicable term of the Company's outstanding derivative contracts; therefore, the Company's forward price curves reflect observable market quotes. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to the length of the contract. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, as well as for those contracts that are not actively traded, the Company uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contracts is a function of underlying forward commodity prices, interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of contracts. Refer to Note 14 for further discussion regarding the Company's risk management and hedging activities.


The Company's mortgage loans held for sale are valued based on independent quoted market prices, where available, or the prices of other mortgage whole loans with similar characteristics. As necessary, these prices are adjusted for typical securitization activities, including servicing value, portfolio composition, market conditions and liquidity.


167


The Company's investments in money market mutual funds and debt and equity securities are stated at fair value and are primarily accounted for as available-for-sale securities.value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value. In the absence of a quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security, the fair value is determined using pricing models or net asset values based on observable market inputs and quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristics.


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the Company's financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):. Transfers out of Level 3 occur primarily due to increased price observability.
Commodity DerivativesInterest Rate Derivatives
202220212020202220212020
Beginning balance$(151)$116 $97 $19 $62 $14 
Changes included in earnings(1)
(85)(43)(10)(13)(43)48 
Changes in fair value recognized in OCI(13)— — — — 
Changes in fair value recognized in net regulatory assets(52)(118)(17)— — — 
Purchases(76)— — — 
Settlements171 (34)41 — — — 
Transfers out of Level 3 into Level 246 17 — — — — 
Ending balance$(59)$(151)$116 $$19 $62 
 Commodity Derivatives Interest Rate Derivatives Auction Rate Securities
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
                  
Beginning balance$60
 $47
 $51
 $6
 $4
 $
 $
 $44
 $45
Changes included in earnings23
 8
 19
 147
 121
 87
 
 5
 
Changes in fair value recognized in OCI(3) (2) (7) 
 
 
 
 8
 (1)
Changes in fair value recognized in net regulatory assets(1) (11) (19) 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases1
 1
 1
 4
 
 
 
 
 
Redemptions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (57) 
Settlements14
 17
 2
 (148) (119) (86) 
 
 
Transfers from Level 2
 
 
 
 
 3
 
 
 
Ending balance$94
 $60
 $47
 $9
 $6
 $4
 $
 $
 $44


(1)Changes included in earnings for interest rate derivatives are reported net of amounts related to the satisfaction of the associated loan commitment.

The Company's long-term debt is carried at cost, including fair value adjustments and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs as applicable, on the Consolidated Financial Statements. The fair value of the Company's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The carrying value of the Company's variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value because of the frequent repricing of these instruments at market rates. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Company's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$51,635 $46,906 $49,762 $57,189 

 2017 2016
 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
 Value Value Value Value
        
Long-term debt$35,193
 $40,522
 $36,116
 $40,718

(16)Commitments and Contingencies


Commitments


The Company has the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as of December 31, 20172022 are as follows (in millions):
2028 and
20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$3,431 $1,879 $1,381 $1,286 $1,234 $11,862 $21,073 
Construction commitments2,434 1,088 144 294 10 — 3,970 
Easements88 86 85 86 87 3,049 3,481 
Maintenance, service and other contracts461 350 297 283 256 1,472 3,119 
$6,414 $3,403 $1,907 $1,949 $1,587 $16,383 $31,643 
168

            2023 and  
  2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total
Contract type:              
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments $2,098
 $1,637
 $1,435
 $1,210
 $1,055
 $10,044
 $17,479
Construction commitments 1,120
 57
 5
 
 
 
 1,182
Operating leases and easements 180
 157
 141
 121
 111
 1,297
 2,007
Maintenance, service and other contracts 246
 249
 238
 231
 253
 1,055
 2,272
  $3,644
 $2,100
 $1,819
 $1,562
 $1,419
 $12,396
 $22,940



Fuel, Capacity and Transmission Contract Commitments


The Utilities have fuel supply and related transportation and lime contracts for their coal- and natural gas-fueled generating facilities. The Utilities expect to supplement these contracts with additional contracts and spot market purchases to fulfill their future fossil fuel needs. The Utilities acquire a portion of their electricity through long-term purchases and exchange agreements. The Utilities have several power purchase agreements with renewable generating facilities that are not included in the table above as the payments are based on the amount of energy generated and there are no minimum payments. The Utilities also have contracts for the right to transmit electricity over other entities' transmission lines to facilitate delivery to their customers.


MidAmerican Energy has long-term rail transportation contracts with BNSF Railway Company ("BNSF"), an affiliate company, and Union Pacific Railroad Company for the transportation of coal to all of the MidAmerican Energy-operated coal-fueled generating facilities. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015, $1092020, $100 million, $137$76 million and $185$90 million, respectively, were incurred for coal transportation services, the majority of which was related to the BNSF agreement.


Construction Commitments


The Company's firm construction commitments reflected in the table above include the following major construction projects:
MidAmerican Energy's construction of wind-powered generating facilities and the last of the four Multi-Value Projects approved by the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. for high voltage transmission lines in Iowa and Illinois in 2018.
ALP's investments in directly assigned transmission projects from the AESO.
PacifiCorp's costs associated with certain generating plant, transmission, and distribution projects.

MidAmerican Energy's firm construction commitments primarily consisting of contracts for the repowering and construction of wind- and solar-powered generating facilities and the settlement of AROs.
Operating LeasesNevada Utilities' firm construction commitments consisting of costs associated with a planned 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada, a planned 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada and certain other generating plant projects and costs associated with two additional solar photovoltaic facility projects. The first project is a 250-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 200 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Humboldt County, Nevada. The second project is a 350-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 280 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Humboldt County, Nevada. Commercial operation has been delayed for both projects to an undetermined date. Both facilities will be jointly owned and operated by Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific.
AltaLink's investments in directly assigned transmission projects from the AESO.

Easements


The Company has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office equipment, office space, certain operating facilities, land and rail cars. These leases generally require the Company to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. The Company also has non-cancelable easements for land on which certain of its assets, primarily wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities, are located. Rent expense on non-cancelable operating leases and easements totaled $156 million for both 2017 and 2016 and $146 million for 2015.


Maintenance, Service and Other Contracts


The Company has entered into service agreements related to its nonregulated solarwind-powered and wind-poweredsolar-powered projects with third parties to operate and maintain the projects under fixed-fee operating and maintenance agreements. Additionally, thethe Company has various non-cancelable maintenance, service and other contracts primarily related to turbine and equipment maintenance and various other service agreements.

Legal Matters

The Company is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. The Company does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.


Environmental Laws and Regulations


The Company is subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, renewable portfolio standards,climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact the Company'sits current and future operations. The Company believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.




169


Hydroelectric Relicensing


PacifiCorp's Klamath hydroelectric systemPacifiCorp is currently operating under annual licenses witha party to the FERC. In February 2010, PacifiCorp, the United States Department of the Interior, the United States Department of Commerce, the state of California, the state of Oregon and various other governmental and non-governmental settlement parties signed the2016 amended Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement ("KHSA").

Congress failed, which is intended to pass legislation neededresolve disputes surrounding PacifiCorp's efforts to implementrelicense the original KHSA. On April 6, 2016,Klamath Hydroelectric Project. The KHSA establishes a process for PacifiCorp, the states of California and Oregon and the United States Departments of the Interior and CommerceCalifornia ("States") and other stakeholders executed an amendment to the KHSA. Consistentassess whether dam removal can occur consistent with the termssettlement's terms. For PacifiCorp, the key elements of the amended KHSA, on September 23, 2016, PacifiCorpsettlement include: (1) a contribution from PacifiCorp's Oregon and California customers capped at $200 million plus $250 million in California bond funds; (2) complete indemnification from harms associated with dam removal; (3) transfer of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") license to a third-party dam removal entity, the Klamath River Renewal Corporation ("KRRC"), who would conduct dam removal; and (4) ability for PacifiCorp to operate the facilities for the benefit of customers until dam removal commences.

In September 2016, the KRRC and PacifiCorp filed a private, independent nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization formed by signatories of the amended KSHA, jointly filed anjoint application with the FERC to transfer the license for the four mainstem Klamath River hydroelectric generating facilitiesdams comprising the Lower Klamath Project (FERC Project No. 14803) from PacifiCorp to the KRRC. Also on September 23, 2016,The FERC approved the KRRC filed an application with the FERC to surrender the license and decommission the facilities. The KRRC's license surrender application included a request for the FERC to refrain from acting on the surrender application until after thepartial transfer of the Klamath license in a July 2020 order, subject to the KRRC is effective.

condition that PacifiCorp remains co-licensee. Under the amended KHSA, PacifiCorp did not agree to remain co-licensee during the surrender and removal process given concerns about liability protections for PacifiCorp and its customers are protected from uncapped dam removal costscustomers. In November 2020, PacifiCorp entered a memorandum of agreement (the "MOA") with the KRRC, the Karuk Tribe, the Yurok Tribe and liabilities.the States to continue implementation of the KHSA. The agreement required the States, PacifiCorp and KRRC must indemnifyto file a new license transfer application to remove PacifiCorp from liabilities associated with dam removal. The amended KHSA also limits PacifiCorp's contribution to facilities removal costs to no more than $200 million,the license for the Lower Klamath Project and add the States and KRRC as co-licensees for the purposes of which up to $184 million would be collected from PacifiCorp's Oregon customers withsurrender. In addition, the remainder to be collected from PacifiCorp's California customers. California voters approved a water bond measure in November 2014 from which the state of California's contribution towards facilities removal costs are being drawn. In accordance with this bond measure,MOA provides for additional contingency funding of up$45 million, equally split between PacifiCorp and the States, and for PacifiCorp and the States to $250 million for facilities removal costs was includedequally share in any additional cost overruns in the California state budget in 2016, with the funding effective for at least five years. If facilitiesunlikely event that dam removal costs exceed the combined$450 million in funding that will be availableto ensure dam removal is complete. The MOA also requires PacifiCorp to cover the costs associated with certain pre-existing environmental conditions. In June 2021, the FERC approved the transfer of the Lower Klamath Project dams from PacifiCorp'sPacifiCorp to the KRRC and the States as co-licensees. In July 2021, the Oregon, Wyoming, Idaho and California customers andstate public utility commissions conditionally approved the staterequired property transfer applications. In August 2021, PacifiCorp notified the Public Service Commission of California, sufficient funds would need to be providedUtah of the property transfer, however no formal approval is required in Utah. In August 2022, the FERC staff issued a final environmental impact statement for the project, concluding that dam removal is the preferred action. In November 2022, the FERC issued a license surrender order for the project, which was accepted by the KRRC or an entity other than PacifiCorp for removal to proceed.

If certain conditions in the amended KHSA are not satisfied and the license does notStates in December 2022, along with the transfer of the Lower Klamath Project dams. Although PacifiCorp no longer owns the Lower Klamath Project, PacifiCorp will continue to operate the facilities under an operation and maintenance agreement with the KRRC PacifiCorp will resume relicensing withuntil each facility is ready for removal. Removal of the FERC.Copco No. 2 facility is anticipated to begin in 2023, and removal of the remaining three dams (J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, and Iron Gate) is anticipated to begin in 2024.

As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp's assets included $55 million of costs associated with the Klamath hydroelectric system's mainstem dams and the associated relicensing and settlement costs, which are being depreciated and amortized in accordance with state regulatory approvals through either December 31, 2019, or December 31, 2022, depending upon the state jurisdiction.


Hydroelectric Commitments


Certain of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric licenses and settlement agreements contain requirements for PacifiCorp to make certain capital and operating expenditures related to its hydroelectric facilities. PacifiCorp estimates it is obligatedfacilities, which are estimated to make capital expenditures ofbe approximately $239$282 million over the next 10 yearsyears.

Legal Matters

The Company is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. The Company does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. The Company is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties and other costs in substantial amounts and are described below.

Wildfires Overview - PacifiCorp

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. PacifiCorp evaluates the related range of reasonably estimated losses and records a loss based on its best estimate within that range or the lower end of the range if there is no better estimate.


170


In California, under inverse condemnation, courts have held that investor-owned utilities can be liable for real and personal property damages from wildfires without the utility being found negligent and regardless of fault. California law also permits inverse condemnation plaintiffs to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs. In both Oregon and California, PacifiCorp has equipment in areas accessed through special use permits, easements or similar agreements that may contain provisions requiring it to pay for damages caused by its equipment regardless of fault. Even if inverse condemnation or other provisions do not apply, PacifiCorp could be found liable for all damages proximately caused by negligence, including real and personal property and natural resource damages; fire suppression costs; personal injury and loss of life damages; and interest.

2020 Wildfires

In September 2020, a severe weather event resulting in high winds, low humidity and warm temperatures contributed to several major wildfires, which resulted in real and personal property and natural resource damage, personal injuries and loss of life and widespread power outages in Oregon and Northern California (the "2020 Wildfires"). The wildfires spread across certain parts of PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas across multiple counties in Oregon and California, including Siskiyou County, California; Jackson County, Oregon; Douglas County, Oregon; Marion County, Oregon; Lincoln County, Oregon; and Klamath County, Oregon burning over 500,000 acres in aggregate. Third party reports for these wildfires indicate over 2,000 structures destroyed, including residences; several structures damaged; multiple individuals injured; and several fatalities. Fire suppression costs estimated by various agencies total approximately $150 million.

Investigations into the cause and origin of each wildfire are complex and ongoing and being conducted by various entities, including the U.S. Forest Service, the California Public Utilities Commission, the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Justice, PacifiCorp and various experts engaged by PacifiCorp.

As of the date of this filing, numerous lawsuits have been filed in Oregon and California, including a class action complaint in Oregon, on behalf of plaintiffs related to these licenses.the 2020 Wildfires. The plaintiffs seek damages that include property damages, economic losses, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and other damages. Additionally, several insurance carriers have filed subrogation complaints in Oregon and California with allegations similar to those made in the aforementioned lawsuits. The final determinations of liability, however, will only be made following the completion of comprehensive investigations and litigation processes.


PacifiCorp has accrued cumulative estimated probable losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $477 million through December 31, 2022. The accrual includes PacifiCorp's estimate of losses for fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages that are considered probable of being incurred and that it is reasonably able to estimate at this time. For certain aspects of the 2020 Wildfires for which loss is considered probable, information necessary to reasonably estimate the potential losses, such as those related to certain areas of natural resource damages, is not currently available.

It is reasonably possible PacifiCorp will incur additional losses beyond the amounts accrued; however, PacifiCorp is currently unable to estimate the range of possible additional losses that could be incurred due to the number of properties and parties involved and the variation in those types of properties and lack of available details. To the extent losses beyond the amounts accrued are incurred, additional insurance coverage is expected to be available to cover a portion of the losses.

The following table presents changes in PacifiCorp's liability for estimated losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$252 $252 $— 
Accrued losses225 — 252 
Payments(53)— — 
Ending balance$424 $252 $252 

PacifiCorp's receivable for expected insurance recoveries associated with the probable losses was $246 million and $116 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, PacifiCorp recognized probable losses net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively.

171


2022 McKinney Fire

According to California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, on July 29, 2022, at approximately 2:16 p.m. Pacific Time, a wildfire began in the Oak Knoll Ranger District of the Klamath National Forest in Siskiyou County, California (the "2022 McKinney Fire") located in PacifiCorp's service territory. Third party reports indicate that the 2022 McKinney Fire resulted in 11 structures damaged, 185 structures destroyed, 12 injuries and four fatalities and consumed 60,000 acres. The cause of the 2022 McKinney Fire is undetermined and remains under investigation by the U.S. Forest Service.

Due to the preliminary nature of the investigation PacifiCorp does not believe a loss is probable and therefore has not accrued any loss as of the date of this filing. While the loss is not probable, PacifiCorp estimates the potential loss, excluding losses for natural resource damages, to be $31 million, net of expected insurance recoveries. The loss estimate includes PacifiCorp's estimate of losses for fire suppression costs; real and personal property damages; and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. PacifiCorp is unable to estimate the total potential loss, including losses for natural resource damages, because there are a number of unknown facts and legal considerations that may impact the amount of any potential liability, including the total scope and nature of claims that may be asserted against PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp has insurance available and estimates the potential insurance recoveries to be $103 million, to cover potential losses.

As of the date of this filing, multiple lawsuits have been filed in California on behalf of plaintiffs related to the 2022 McKinney Fire. The plaintiffs seek damages that include property damages, economic losses, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and other damages but the amount of damages sought are not specified. The final determinations of liability, however, will only be made following the completion of comprehensive investigations and litigation processes.

Guarantees


The Company has entered into guarantees as part of the normal course of business and the sale of certain assets. These guarantees are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial results.


(17)
BHE Shareholders' Equity

(17)    Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Energy Products and Services

The following table summarizes the Company's energy products and services Customer Revenue by regulated energy and nonregulated energy, with further disaggregation of regulated energy by line of business, including a reconciliation to the Company's reportable segment information included in Note 22, for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
2022
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$5,099 $2,320 $3,465 $— $— $— $— $— $10,884 
Retail Gas— 855 167 — — — — — 1,022 
Wholesale260 668 92 — — — (4)1,024 
Transmission and
   distribution
166 61 76 1,081 — 683 — — 2,067 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 2,603 — — (127)2,476 
Other102 — — — — (2)105 
Total Regulated5,627 3,904 3,802 1,081 2,614 683 — (133)17,578 
Nonregulated— — 169 1,076 70 866 597 2,785 
Total Customer Revenue5,627 3,911 3,802 1,250 3,690 753 866 464 20,363 
Other revenue52 114 22 115 154 (21)128 142 706 
Total$5,679 $4,025 $3,824 $1,365 $3,844 $732 $994 $606 $21,069 
172


2021
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$4,847 $2,128 $2,828 $— $— $— $— $(2)$9,801 
Retail Gas— 859 115 — — — — — 974 
Wholesale157 454 62 — 57 — — (3)727 
Transmission and
   distribution
143 58 74 1,023 — 702 — — 2,000 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 2,404 — — (131)2,273 
Other108 — — (1)— — 109 
Total Regulated5,255 3,499 3,080 1,023 2,460 702 — (135)15,884 
Nonregulated— 15 43 956 35 796 576 2,424 
Total Customer Revenue5,255 3,514 3,083 1,066 3,416 737 796 441 18,308 
Other revenue41 33 24 122 128 (6)185 100 627 
Total$5,296 $3,547 $3,107 $1,188 $3,544 $731 $981 $541 $18,935 
2020
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$4,932 $1,924 $2,566 $— $— $— $— $(1)$9,421 
Retail Gas— 505 114 — — — — — 619 
Wholesale107 199 45 — 17 — — (2)366 
Transmission and
   distribution
96 60 95 887 — 641 — — 1,779 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 1,397 — — (139)1,258 
Other108 — — — — — — 110 
Total Regulated5,243 2,688 2,822 887 1,414 641 — (142)13,553 
Nonregulated— 16 26 134 18 817 515 1,528 
Total Customer Revenue5,243 2,704 2,824 913 1,548 659 817 373 15,081 
Other revenue98 24 30 109 30 — 119 65 475 
Total$5,341 $2,728 $2,854 $1,022 $1,578 $659 $936 $438 $15,556 
(1)The BHE and Other reportable segment represents amounts related principally to other entities, including MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

Real Estate Services

The following table summarizes the Company's real estate services Customer Revenue by line of business for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
HomeServices
202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Brokerage$4,867 $5,498 $4,520 
Franchise66 85 76 
Total Customer Revenue4,933 5,583 4,596 
Mortgage and other revenue335 632 800 
Total$5,268 $6,215 $5,396 
173


Remaining Performance Obligations

The following table summarizes the Company's revenue it expects to recognize in future periods related to significant unsatisfied remaining performance obligations for fixed contracts with expected durations in excess of one year as of December 31, 2022, by reportable segment (in millions):
Performance obligations expected to be satisfied
Less than 12 monthsMore than 12 monthsTotal
BHE Pipeline Group$2,835 $20,619 $23,454 
BHE Transmission679 — 679 
Total$3,514 $20,619 $24,133 

(18)BHE Shareholders' Equity

Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, BHE had 849,982 and 1,649,988 shares outstanding of its Perpetual Preferred Stock (the "4% Perpetual Preferred Stock") issued to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. The 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and currently pays a 4.00% dividend per share on the liquidation preference. Dividends shall accrue and accumulate daily, be cumulative, compound semi-annually and, if declared, be payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year. If dividends are not declared and paid, any accumulating dividends shall continue to accumulate and compound. BHE may not make any dividends on shares of any other class or series of its capital stock (other than for dividends on shares of common stock payable in shares of common stock, unless the holders of the then outstanding 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock shall first receive, or simultaneously receive, a dividend in an amount at least equivalent to the amount accumulated and not previously paid. BHE may not declare or pay any dividends on shares of the 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock if such declaration or payment would constitute an event of default on BHE's senior indebtedness (as defined). BHE may, at its option, redeem the 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock in whole or in part at any time at a price per share equal to the liquidation preference.

Common Stock


On March 14, 2000, and as amended on December 7, 2005, BHE's shareholders entered into a Shareholder Agreement that provides specific rights to certain shareholders. One of these rights allows certain shareholders the ability to put their common shares back to BHE at the then currentthen-current fair value dependent on certain circumstances controlled by BHE.


OnIn June 19, 2017,2022, BHE issued $100 million of its 5.00% junior subordinated debentures due June 2057 in exchange for 181,819purchased 740,961 shares of its common stock from certain family interestsheld by Mr. Gregory E. Abel, BHE's Chair, for $870 million. The purchase was pursuant to the terms of Mr. Walter Scott, Jr. On February 17, 2017, BHE repurchased from certain family interests of Mr. Walter Scott, Jr. 35,000 shares of its common stock for $19 million. On February 17, 2015, BHE repurchased from certain family interests of Mr. Walter Scott, Jr. 75,000 shares of its common stock for $36 million.BHE's Shareholders Agreement.



Restricted Net Assets


BHE has maximum debt-to-total capitalization percentage restrictions imposed by its senior unsecured credit facilities expiring in May 2018 and June 20202025 which, in certain circumstances, limit BHE's ability to make cash dividends or distributions. As a result of this restriction, BHE has restricted net assets of $16.9$18.8 billion as of December 31, 2017.2022.


Certain of BHE's subsidiaries have restrictions on their ability to dividend, loan or advance funds to BHE due to specific legal or regulatory restrictions, including, but not limited to, maximum debt-to-total capitalization percentages and commitments made to state commissions or federal agencies in connection with past acquisitions.commissions. As a result of these restrictions, BHE's subsidiaries had restricted net assets of $19.4$20.4 billion as of December 31, 2017.2022.



(18)
174


(19)Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net


The following table shows the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss attributable to BHE shareholders by each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income taxes, for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
UnrecognizedForeignUnrealizedAOCI
Amounts onCurrencyGains (Losses)Attributable
RetirementTranslationon Cash FlowNoncontrollingTo BHE
BenefitsAdjustmentHedgesInterestsShareholders, Net
Balance, December 31, 2019$(417)$(1,296)$$— $(1,706)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(65)234 (15)— 154 
BHE GT&S acquisition(10)— — 10 — 
Balance, December 31, 2020(492)(1,062)(8)10 (1,552)
Other comprehensive income (loss)174 (24)67 (5)212 
Balance, December 31, 2021(318)(1,086)59 (1,340)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(72)(810)76 (3)(809)
Balance, December 31, 2022$(390)$(1,896)$135 $$(2,149)
          Accumulated
      Unrealized   Other
  Unrecognized Foreign Gains on Unrealized Comprehensive
  Amounts on Currency Available- Gains on Loss Attributable
  Retirement Translation For-Sale Cash Flow To BHE
  Benefits Adjustment Securities Hedges Shareholders, Net
           
Balance, December 31, 2014 $(490) $(412) $390
 $18
 $(494)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 52
 (680) 225
 (11) (414)
Balance, December 31, 2015 (438) (1,092) 615
 7
 (908)
Other comprehensive income (loss) (9) (583) (30) 19
 (603)
Balance, December 31, 2016 (447) (1,675) 585
 26
 (1,511)
Other comprehensive income (loss) 64
 546
 500
 3
 1,113
Balance, December 31, 2017 $(383) $(1,129) $1,085
 $29
 $(398)


Reclassifications from AOCI to net income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 were insignificant. For information regarding cash flow hedge reclassifications from AOCI to net income in their entirety, refer to Note 14. Additionally, refer to the "Foreign Operations" discussion in Note 1213 for information about unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits reclassifications from AOCI that do not impact net income in their entirety.


(19)
Noncontrolling Interests

(20)Variable Interest Entities and Noncontrolling Interests

The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE and to disclose certain information about its significant variable interests in the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

As part of the GT&S Transaction, BHE acquired an indirect 25% economic interest in Cove Point, consisting of 100% of the general partnership interest and 25% of the total limited partnership interests. BHE concluded that Cove Point is a VIE due to the limited partners lacking the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. BHE is the primary beneficiary of Cove Point as it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact its economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses and benefits which could be significant to it.

Included in noncontrolling interests on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are (i) Dominion Energy's 50% interest in Cove Point and Brookfield Super-Core Infrastructure Partner's 25% interest in Cove Point and (ii) preferred securities of subsidiaries of $58$58 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, consisting of $56 million of 8.061% cumulative preferred securities of Northern Electric plc.,plc, a subsidiary of Northern Powergrid, which are redeemable in the event of the revocation of Northern Electric plc.'splc's electricity distribution license by the Secretary of State, and $2 million of nonredeemable preferred stock of PacifiCorp.



(20)
175


(21)Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures


The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years endingended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$2,071 $2,041 $1,855 
Income taxes received, net(1)
$1,863 $1,309 $1,361 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$1,049 $834 $801 

(1)Includes $1,961 million, $1,441 million and $1,504 million of income taxes received from Berkshire Hathaway in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

 2017 2016 2015
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$1,715
 $1,673
 $1,764
Income taxes received, net(1)
$540
 $1,016
 $1,666
      
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:     
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$653
 $547
 $718
Common stock exchanged for junior subordinated debentures$100
 $
 $

(1)Includes $636 million, $1.1 billion and $1.8 billion of income taxes received from Berkshire Hathaway in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


(21)(22)Segment Information


The Company's reportable segments with foreign operations include Northern Powergrid, whose business is principally in the United Kingdom, and BHE Transmission, whose business includes operations in Canada, and BHE Renewables, whose business includes operations in the Philippines.Canada. Intersegment eliminations and adjustments, including the allocation of goodwill, have been made. Information related to the Company's reportable segments is shown below (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
PacifiCorp$5,679 $5,296 $5,341 
MidAmerican Funding4,025 3,547 2,728 
NV Energy3,824 3,107 2,854 
Northern Powergrid1,365 1,188 1,022 
BHE Pipeline Group3,844 3,544 1,578 
BHE Transmission732 731 659 
BHE Renewables994 981 936 
HomeServices5,268 6,215 5,396 
BHE and Other(1)
606 541 438 
Total operating revenue$26,337 $25,150 $20,952 
   
Depreciation and amortization:   
PacifiCorp$1,120 $1,088 $1,209 
MidAmerican Funding1,168 914 716 
NV Energy566 549 502 
Northern Powergrid361 305 266 
BHE Pipeline Group508 492 231 
BHE Transmission239 238 201 
BHE Renewables264 241 284 
HomeServices56 52 45 
BHE and Other(1)
Total depreciation and amortization$4,286 $3,881 $3,455 
   
176


Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:     
PacifiCorp$5,237
 $5,201
 $5,232
MidAmerican Funding2,846
 2,631
 2,515
NV Energy3,015
 2,895
 3,351
Northern Powergrid949
 995
 1,140
BHE Pipeline Group993
 978
 1,016
BHE Transmission699
 502
 592
BHE Renewables838
 743
 728
HomeServices3,443
 2,801
 2,526
BHE and Other(1)
594
 676
 780
Total operating revenue$18,614
 $17,422
 $17,880
     
Depreciation and amortization:     
PacifiCorp$796
 $783
 $780
MidAmerican Funding500
 479
 407
NV Energy422
 421
 410
Northern Powergrid214
 200
 202
BHE Pipeline Group159
 206
 204
BHE Transmission239
 241
 185
BHE Renewables251
 230
 216
HomeServices66
 31
 29
BHE and Other(1)
(1) 
 (5)
Total depreciation and amortization$2,646
 $2,591
 $2,428
     202220212020
Operating income:     Operating income:
PacifiCorp$1,462
 $1,427
 $1,344
PacifiCorp$1,158 $1,133 $924 
MidAmerican Funding562
 566
 451
MidAmerican Funding438 416 454 
NV Energy765
 770
 812
NV Energy606 621 649 
Northern Powergrid436
 494
 593
Northern Powergrid551 543 421 
BHE Pipeline Group475
 455
 464
BHE Pipeline Group1,720 1,516 779 
BHE Transmission322
 92
 260
BHE Transmission333 339 316 
BHE Renewables316
 256
 255
BHE Renewables300 329 291 
HomeServices214
 212
 184
HomeServices151 505 511 
BHE and Other(1)
(38) (21) (35)
BHE and Other(1)
(16)(75)(54)
Total operating income4,514
 4,251
 4,328
Total operating income5,241 5,327 4,291 
Interest expense(1,841) (1,854) (1,904)Interest expense(2,216)(2,118)(2,021)
Capitalized interest45
 139
 74
Capitalized interest76 64 80 
Allowance for equity funds76
 158
 91
Allowance for equity funds167 126 165 
Interest and dividend income111
 120
 107
Interest and dividend income154 89 71 
(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net(2,002)1,823 4,797 
Other, net(398) 36
 39
Other, net(7)(17)88 
Total income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity (loss) income$2,507
 $2,850
 $2,735
Total income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity lossTotal income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss$1,413 $5,294 $7,471 
Interest expense:Interest expense:
PacifiCorpPacifiCorp$431 $430 $426 
MidAmerican FundingMidAmerican Funding333 319 322 
NV EnergyNV Energy221 206 227 
Northern PowergridNorthern Powergrid133 130 130 
BHE Pipeline GroupBHE Pipeline Group148 143 74 
BHE TransmissionBHE Transmission153 155 148 
BHE RenewablesBHE Renewables175 158 166 
HomeServicesHomeServices11 
BHE and Other(1)
BHE and Other(1)
615 573 517 
Total interest expenseTotal interest expense$2,216 $2,118 $2,021 
Income tax (benefit) expense:Income tax (benefit) expense:
PacifiCorpPacifiCorp$(61)$(78)$(75)
MidAmerican FundingMidAmerican Funding(776)(680)(574)
NV EnergyNV Energy56 56 61 
Northern PowergridNorthern Powergrid75 192 96 
BHE Pipeline GroupBHE Pipeline Group276 269 162 
BHE TransmissionBHE Transmission14 10 13 
BHE Renewables(2)
BHE Renewables(2)
(887)(753)(602)
HomeServicesHomeServices47 138 138 
BHE and Other(1)
BHE and Other(1)
(660)(286)1,089 
Total income tax (benefit) expenseTotal income tax (benefit) expense$(1,916)$(1,132)$308 
177


Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,202220212020
2017 2016 2015
Interest expense:     
PacifiCorp$381
 $381
 $383
MidAmerican Funding237
 218
 206
NV Energy233
 250
 262
Northern Powergrid133
 136
 145
BHE Pipeline Group43
 50
 66
BHE Transmission169
 153
 146
BHE Renewables204
 198
 193
HomeServices7
 2
 3
BHE and Other(1)
434
 466
 500
Total interest expense$1,841
 $1,854
 $1,904
     
Income tax (benefit) expense:     
Earnings on common shares:Earnings on common shares:
PacifiCorp$362
 $341
 $328
PacifiCorp$921 $889 $741 
MidAmerican Funding(202) (139) (150)MidAmerican Funding947 883 818 
NV Energy221
 200
 207
NV Energy427 439 410 
Northern Powergrid57
 22
 35
Northern Powergrid385 247 201 
BHE Pipeline Group170
 163
 158
BHE Pipeline Group1,040 807 528 
BHE Transmission(124) 26
 63
BHE Transmission247 247 231 
BHE Renewables(2)
(795) (32) 41
BHE Renewables(2)
625 451 521 
HomeServices49
 81
 72
HomeServices100 387 375 
BHE and Other(1)
(292) (259) (304)
BHE and Other(1)
(2,017)1,319 3,092 
Total income tax (benefit) expense$(554) $403
 $450
Total earnings on common sharesTotal earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $6,917 
     
Capital expenditures:     Capital expenditures:
PacifiCorp$769
 $903
 $916
PacifiCorp$2,166 $1,513 $2,540 
MidAmerican Funding1,776
 1,637
 1,448
MidAmerican Funding1,869 1,912 1,836 
NV Energy456
 529
 571
NV Energy1,113 749 675 
Northern Powergrid579
 579
 674
Northern Powergrid768 742 682 
BHE Pipeline Group286
 226
 240
BHE Pipeline Group1,157 1,128 659 
BHE Transmission334
 466
 966
BHE Transmission200 279 372 
BHE Renewables323
 719
 1,034
BHE Renewables138 225 95 
HomeServices37
 20
 16
HomeServices48 42 36 
BHE and Other11
 11
 10
BHE and Other46 21 (130)
Total capital expenditures$4,571
 $5,090
 $5,875
Total capital expenditures$7,505 $6,611 $6,765 


As of December 31,
202220212020
Property, plant and equipment, net:
PacifiCorp$24,430 $22,914 $22,430 
MidAmerican Funding21,092 20,302 19,279 
NV Energy10,993 10,231 9,865 
Northern Powergrid7,445 7,572 7,230 
BHE Pipeline Group16,216 15,692 15,097 
BHE Transmission6,209 6,590 6,445 
BHE Renewables6,231 6,103 5,645 
HomeServices188 169 159 
BHE and Other239 243 (22)
Total property, plant and equipment, net$93,043 $89,816 $86,128 
178


As of December 31,
As of December 31,
2017 2016 2015
Property, plant and equipment, net:     
PacifiCorp$19,203
 $19,162
 $19,039
MidAmerican Funding14,221
 12,835
 11,737
NV Energy9,770
 9,825
 9,767
Northern Powergrid6,075
 5,148
 5,790
BHE Pipeline Group4,587
 4,423
 4,345
BHE Transmission6,330
 5,810
 5,301
BHE Renewables5,637
 5,302
 4,805
HomeServices117
 78
 70
BHE and Other(69) (74) (85)
Total property, plant and equipment, net$65,871
 $62,509
 $60,769
     202220212020
Total assets:     Total assets:
PacifiCorp$23,086
 $23,563
 $23,550
PacifiCorp$30,559 $27,615 $26,862 
MidAmerican Funding18,444
 17,571
 16,315
MidAmerican Funding26,077 25,352 23,530 
NV Energy13,903
 14,320
 14,656
NV Energy16,676 15,239 14,501 
Northern Powergrid7,565
 6,433
 7,317
Northern Powergrid9,005 9,326 8,782 
BHE Pipeline Group5,134
 5,144
 4,953
BHE Pipeline Group21,005 20,434 19,541 
BHE Transmission9,009
 8,378
 7,553
BHE Transmission9,334 9,476 9,208 
BHE Renewables7,687
 7,010
 5,892
BHE Renewables11,458 11,829 12,004 
HomeServices2,722
 1,776
 1,705
HomeServices3,436 4,574 4,955 
BHE and Other2,658
 1,245
 1,677
BHE and Other6,290 8,220 7,933 
Total assets$90,208
 $85,440
 $83,618
Total assets$133,840 $132,065 $127,316 
     
Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue by country:     
United States$16,916
 $15,895
 $16,121
United Kingdom948
 995
 1,140
Canada699
 506
 600
Philippines and other51
 26
 19
Total operating revenue by country$18,614
 $17,422
 $17,880
     
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity (loss) income by country:    
United States$1,927
 $2,264
 $2,034
United Kingdom313
 382
 472
Canada167
 135
 165
Philippines and other100
 69
 64
Total income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity (loss) income by country:$2,507
 $2,850
 $2,735

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue by country:
U.S.$24,263 $23,215 $19,254 
United Kingdom1,345 1,188 1,022 
Canada709 719 653 
Australia20 — — 
Other— 28 23 
Total operating revenue by country$26,337 $25,150 $20,952 
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss by country:
U.S.$771 $4,650 $6,954 
United Kingdom447 454 338 
Canada181 181 173 
Australia15 (8)— 
Other(1)17 
Total income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss by country$1,413 $5,294 $7,471 
As of December 31,
202220212020
Property, plant and equipment, net by country:
U.S.$79,578 $75,774 $72,583 
United Kingdom6,959 7,487 7,134 
Canada6,091 6,547 6,401 
Australia415 10 
Total property, plant and equipment, net by country$93,043 $89,816 $86,128 

(1)The differences between the reportable segment amounts and the consolidated amounts, described as BHE and Other, relate to other corporate entities, including MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

(2)Income tax (benefit) expense includes the tax attributes of disregarded entities that are not required to pay income taxes and the earnings of which are taxable directly to BHE.

179


 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Property, plant and equipment, net by country:     
United States$53,579
 $51,671
 $49,680
United Kingdom5,953
 5,020
 5,757
Canada6,323
 5,803
 5,298
Philippines and other16
 15
 34
Total property, plant and equipment, net by country$65,871
 $62,509
 $60,769

(1)The differences between the reportable segment amounts and the consolidated amounts, described as BHE and Other, relate to other corporate entities, including MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

(2)Income tax (benefit) expense includes the tax attributes of disregarded entities that are not required to pay income taxes and the earnings of which are taxable directly to BHE.

The following table shows the change in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 (in millions):
BHE
MidAmericanNVNorthernPipelineBHEBHE
PacifiCorpFundingEnergyPowergridGroupTransmissionRenewablesHomeServicesTotal
December 31, 2020$1,129 $2,102 $2,369 $1,000 $1,803 $1,551 $95 $1,457 $11,506 
Acquisitions— — — — 11 — — 129 140 
Foreign currency translation— — — (8)— 12 — — 
December 31, 20211,129 2,102 2,369 992 1,814 1,563 95 1,586 11,650 
Acquisitions— — — — — — — 16 16 
Foreign currency translation— — — (75)— (102)— — (177)
December 31, 2022$1,129 $2,102 $2,369 $917 $1,814 $1,461 $95 $1,602 $11,489 

180
         BHE       BHE  
   MidAmerican NV Northern Pipeline BHE BHE Home- and  
 PacifiCorp Funding Energy Powergrid Group Transmission Renewables Services Other Total
                    
December 31, 2015$1,129
 $2,102
 $2,369
 $1,056
 $101
 $1,428
 $95
 $794
 $2
 $9,076
Acquisitions
 
 
 
 
 4
 
 46
 
 50
Foreign currency translation
 
 
 (126) 
 42
 
 
 (2) (86)
Other
 
 
 
 (26) (4) 
 
 
 (30)
December 31, 20161,129
 2,102
 2,369
 930
 75
 1,470
 95
 840
 
 9,010
Acquisitions
 
 
 
 
 
 
 508
 
 508
Foreign currency translation
 
 
 61
 
 101
 
 
 
 162
Other
 
 
 
 (2) 
 
 
 
 (2)
December 31, 2017$1,129
 $2,102
 $2,369
 $991
 $73
 $1,571
 $95
 $1,348
 $
 $9,678




PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section


Item 6.Selected Financial Data

The following table sets forth PacifiCorp's selected consolidated historical financial data, which should be read in conjunction with the information in Item 7 of this Form 10-K and with PacifiCorp's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The selected consolidated historical financial data has been derived from PacifiCorp's audited historical Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto (in millions).


181
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
          
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:         
Operating revenue$5,237
 $5,201
 $5,232
 $5,252
 $5,147
Operating income1,462
 1,426
 1,340
 1,300
 1,264
Net income768
 763
 695
 698
 682



 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
          
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:         
Total assets(1)(2)
$21,920
 $22,394
 $22,367
 $22,205
 $21,559
Short-term debt80
 270
 20
 20
 
Current portion of long-term debt and         
capital lease obligations588
 58
 68
 134
 238
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations,         
excluding current portion(2)
6,437
 7,021
 7,078
 6,885
 6,605
Total shareholders' equity7,555
 7,390
 7,503
 7,756
 7,787
Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

(1)In December 2015, PacifiCorp retrospectively adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-17, which resulted in the reclassification of current deferred income tax assets in the amounts of $28 million and $66 million, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, as reductions in noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities.

(2)In December 2015, PacifiCorp retrospectively adopted Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, which resulted in the reclassification of certain deferred debt issuance costs previously recognized within other assets in the amounts of $34 million, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, as reductions in long-term debt.


Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of PacifiCorp during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 6 of this Form 10-K and with PacifiCorp's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. PacifiCorp's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.


Results of Operations


Overview


Net income for the year ended December 31, 2022, was $920 million, an increase of $32 million, or 4%, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher utility margin, lower other expense, including higher allowance for equity and borrowed funds used during construction and lower property and other taxes, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance expense, largely due to higher general and plant maintenance costs and an increase to the wildfire damage provision, higher depreciation and amortization expense, and lower income tax benefit. Utility margin increased primarily due to higher net power cost deferrals, higher retail prices and volumes, higher average wholesale market prices, lower coal-fueled generation volumes and higher net wheeling revenues, partially offset by higher natural gas-fueled generation prices and volumes, higher purchased electricity costs from higher volumes and prices, higher coal-fueled generation prices, lower wind-based ancillary revenues, and lower wholesale volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.6% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable impacts of weather and an increase in commercial customer usage, partially offset by a decrease in residential and industrial customer usage. Energy generated decreased 4% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due lower coal-fueled generation, partially offset by higher wind-powered, natural gas-fueled and hydroelectric-powered generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes decreased 5% and purchased electricity volumes increased 20%.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2017,2021, was $768$888 million, an increase of $5$149 million, or 1%20%, compared to 2016, which includes $6 million of income from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (the "2017 Tax Reform"). Excluding the impact of 2017 Tax Reform, adjusted net income for the year ended December 31, 2017, was $762 million, a decrease of $1 million compared to 2016. Net income decreased2020, primarily due to higher utility gross margin (excluding $231 million of decreases fully offset in depreciation, operating, other income/expense and amortization of $26 million from additional plant placed in-service, lower AFUDC of $11 million, higher property and other taxes of $7 million and higher operations and maintenance expenses of $3 million, excluding the impact of DSM programincome tax expense of $55 million (offset in operating revenue), partially offset by higher gross margins of $72 million, excluding the impact of DSM program revenue (offset in operations and maintenance expense) of $55 million. Gross margins increased due to higher retail customer volumes, lower natural gas-fueled generation, higher wholesale revenue from higher volumes and short-term market prices, and higher wheeling revenues, partially offset by higher purchased electricity costs, lower average retail rates, and higher coal costs. Retail customer volumes increased 1.7% due to impacts of weather across the service territory, higher commercial usage, and an increase in the average number of residential and commercial customers primarily in Utah and Oregon, partially offset by lower residential customers' usage in Utah and Oregon, and lower irrigation usage. Energy generated decreased 2% for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to lower natural gas-fueled and wind-power generation, partially offset by higher coal-fueled, and hydroelectric generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes increased 9% and purchased electricity volumes increased 23%.

Net income for theprior year ended December 31, 2016 was $763 million, an increase of $68 million, or 10%, compared to 2015. Net income increased due to higher margins of $86 million andregulatory adjustments); lower operations and maintenance expensesexpense primarily due to prior year costs associated with the 2020 Wildfires and changes in how obligations associated with the implementation of $18 million,the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met; and favorable income tax expense from higher PTCs recognized due to new wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service and the impacts of ratemaking; partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense (excluding $376 million of $13 million, lower AFUDCdecreases offset in operating revenue and income tax expense due to prior year regulatory adjustments) from the impacts of $9 millionthe depreciation study for which rates became effective January 2021 and higher property taxesplant in-service; and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction. Utility margin increased $145 million (excluding the $231 million of $5 million. Margins increasedfully offsetting decreases) primarily due to the higher retail, wheeling and wholesale revenue; higher deferred net power costs; and lower purchased electricity costs, higher retail revenue, lower coal-fueled generation and lower natural gas costs,volumes; partially offset by lower wholesalehigher purchased electricity revenue. The increase in retail revenue was primarily due toprices; and higher retail rates.natural gas- and coal-fueled generation costs. Retail customer volumes decreased 0.6%increased 3.1% due to lower commercialincrease in customer usage, in Utah and lower industrial customer usage in Utah and Oregon, partially offset by an increase in the average number of residential customers in Utah and Oregon, an increase in the average number of commercial customers in Utah and thefavorable impacts of weather on residential customer volumes.weather. Energy generated decreased 5%increased 10% for 20162021 compared to 20152020 primarily due to lowerhigher wind-powered, natural gas-fueled and coal-fueled generation, partially offset by higher hydroelectric, gas-fueled and wind-poweredlower hydroelectric-powered generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes decreased 25%3% and purchased electricity volumes decreased 2%17%.



182


OperatingNon-GAAP Financial Measure

Management utilizes various key financial measures that are prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as, utility margin, to help evaluate results of operations. Utility margin is calculated as operating revenue less cost of fuel and energy, costswhich are captions presented on the key driversConsolidated Statements of Operations.

PacifiCorp's resultscost of operationsfuel and energy is generally recovered from its retail customers through regulatory recovery mechanisms and, as they encompass retaila result, changes in PacifiCorp's expenses included in regulatory recovery mechanisms result in comparable changes to revenue. As such, management believes utility margin more appropriately and wholesale electricity revenue and the direct costs associated with providing electricity to customers. PacifiCorp believes thatconcisely explains profitability rather than a discussion of grossrevenue and cost of fuel and energy separately. Management believes the presentation of utility margin representingprovides meaningful and valuable insight into the information management considers important to running the business and a measure of comparability to others in the industry.
Utility margin is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating revenue less energy costs,income, which is therefore meaningful.the most directly comparable financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table provides a reconciliation of utility margin to operating income for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin:
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 148 1,831 1,790 41 
Utility margin3,700 3,465 235 3,465 3,551 (86)(2)
Operations and maintenance1,227 1,031 196 19 1,031 1,209 (178)(15)
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 32 1,088 1,209 (121)(10)
Property and other taxes195 213 (18)(8)213 209 
Operating income$1,158 $1,133 $25 %$1,133 $924 $209 23 %

183


Utility Margin

A comparison of PacifiCorp's key operating results related to utility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:

20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 148 1,831 1,790 41 
Utility margin$3,700 $3,465 $235 %$3,465 $3,551 $(86)(2)%
Sales (GWhs):
Residential18,425 17,905 520 %17,905 17,150 755 %
Commercial(1)
19,570 18,839 731 18,839 17,727 1,112 
Industrial(1)
17,622 17,909 (287)(2)17,909 18,039 (130)(1)
Other(1)
1,547 1,621 (74)(5)1,621 1,644 (23)(1)
Total retail57,164 56,274 890 56,274 54,560 1,714 
Wholesale4,836 5,113 (277)(5)5,113 5,249 (136)(3)
Total sales62,000 61,387 613 %61,387 59,809 1,578 %
Average number of retail customers
(in thousands)2,037 2,003 34 %2,003 1,967 36 %
Average revenue per MWh:
Retail$89.33 $86.08 $3.25 %$86.08 $90.59 $(4.51)(5)%
Wholesale$61.39 $37.90 $23.49 62 %$37.90 $35.56 $2.34 %
Heating degree days10,767 9,914 853 %9,914 10,155 (241)(2)%
Cooling degree days2,451 2,431 20 %2,431 2,111 320 15 %
Sources of energy (GWhs)(1):
Coal28,390 31,566 (3,176)(10)%31,566 30,636 930 %
Natural gas13,686 13,323 363 13,323 12,045 1,278 11 
Wind(2)
7,238 6,686 552 6,686 3,769 2,917 77 
Hydroelectric and other(2)
3,206 3,010 196 3,010 3,223 (213)(7)
Total energy generated52,520 54,585 (2,065)(4)54,585 49,673 4,912 10 
Energy purchased13,968 11,601 2,367 20 11,601 14,054 (2,453)(17)
Total66,488 66,186 302 — %66,186 63,727 2,459 %
Average cost of energy per MWh:
Energy generated(3)
$22.86 $18.05 $4.81 27 %$18.05 $18.74 $(0.69)(4)%
Energy purchased$71.15 $66.93 $4.22 %$66.93 $47.60 $19.33 41 %

(1)    GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.
(2)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements or (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities.
(3)    The average cost per MWh of energy generated includes only the cost of fuel associated with the generating facilities.


184


  2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
                 
Gross margin (in millions):                
Operating revenue $5,237
 $5,201
 $36
 1 % $5,201
 $5,232
 $(31) (1)%
Energy costs 1,770
 1,751
 19
 1
 1,751
 1,868
 (117) (6)
Gross margin $3,467
 $3,450
 $17
 
 $3,450
 $3,364
 $86
 3
                 
Sales (GWh):                
Residential 16,625
 16,058
 567
 4 % 16,058
 15,566
 492
 3 %
Commercial(1)
 17,726
 16,857
 869
 5
 16,857
 17,262
 (405) (2)
Industrial, irrigation and other(1)
 20,899
 21,403
 (504) (2) 21,403
 21,813
 (410) (2)
Total retail 55,250
 54,318
 932
 2
 54,318
 54,641
 (323) (1)
Wholesale 7,218
 6,641
 577
 9
 6,641
 8,889
 (2,248) (25)
Total sales 62,468
 60,959
 1,509
 2
 60,959
 63,530
 (2,571) (4)
                 
Average number of retail customers                
(in thousands) 1,867
 1,841
 26
 1 % 1,841
 1,813
 28
 2 %
                 
Average revenue per MWh:                
Retail $87.78
 $89.55
 $(1.77) (2)% $89.55
 $87.99
 $1.56
 2 %
Wholesale $28.56
 $26.46
 $2.10
 8 % $26.46
 $29.92
 $(3.46) (12)%
                 
Sources of energy (GWh)(2):
                
Coal 37,362
 36,578
 784
 2 % 36,578
 41,298
 (4,720) (11)%
Natural gas 7,447
 9,884
 (2,437) (25) 9,884
 9,222
 662
 7
Hydroelectric(3)
 4,731
 3,843
 888
 23
 3,843
 2,914
 929
 32
Wind and other(3)
 2,890
 3,253
 (363) (11) 3,253
 2,892
 361
 12
Total energy generated 52,430
 53,558
 (1,128) (2) 53,558
 56,326
 (2,768) (5)
Energy purchased 14,076
 11,429
 2,647
 23
 11,429
 11,646
 (217) (2)
Total 66,506
 64,987
 1,519
 2
 64,987
 67,972
 (2,985) (4)
                 
Average cost of energy per MWh:                
Energy generated(4)
 $19.14
 $19.27
 $(0.13) (1)% $19.27
 $19.38
 $(0.11) (1)%
Energy purchased $43.25
 $44.64
 $(1.39) (3)% $44.64
 $49.92
 $(5.28) (11)%

(1)In the current year, one customer was reclassified from "Industrial, irrigation and other" into "Commercial" resulting in an increase of 61 GWh to "Commercial."
(2)GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.
(3)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these generating facilities may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements or (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities.
(4)The average cost per MWh of energy generated includes only the cost of fuel associated with the generating facilities.



Year Ended December 31, 20172022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162021


GrossUtility margin increased $17$235 million, or 7% for 20172022 compared to 20162021 primarily due to:
$105290 million offrom higher retail revenues due to increased customer volumes of 1.7% due to impacts of weather across the service territory, higher commercial usage, an increase in the average number of residential and commercial customers primarily in Utah and Oregon, partially offset by lower residential usage in Utah and Oregon and lower irrigation usage;
$54 million of higher net deferrals of incurreddeferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms;
$40263 million of lower natural gas costshigher retail revenue primarily due to lowerhigher average prices and higher volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.6% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable impacts of weather and pricesan increase in 2017;commercial customer usage, partially offset by a decrease in residential and industrial customer usage;
$30103 million of higher wholesale revenue primarily due to higher volumes and short-termaverage market prices;prices, partially offset by lower volumes;
$2044 million of lower coalcoal-fueled generation costs due to prior year charges related to damaged longwall mining equipment;lower volumes, partially offset by higher average prices; and
$1219 million of higherfavorable wheeling revenue, primarily due to increased volumes and short-term prices.activities.
The increases above were partially offset by:
$99259 million of higher natural gas-fueled generation costs primarily due to higher average market prices and higher volumes;
$217 million of higher purchased electricity costs from higher volumes and higher average market prices; and
$10 million of lower wind-based ancillary revenue.

Operations and maintenance increased $196 million, or 19%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to a $64 million increase in the loss accruals associated with the September 2020 wildfires net of estimated insurance recoveries, $38 million of higher plant maintenance costs, $27 million of higher DSM amortization expense (offset in retail revenue), $25 million of changes in the prior year in how obligations associated with the implementation of the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met, $17 million of higher insurance premiums due to cost increases related to wildfire coverage, $37 million of higher consumption of materials, chemical and start-up fuel costs, partially offset by $22 million of deferrals of vegetation management costs in Oregon and Utah, net of higher vegetation management costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $32 million, or 3%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher plant-in-service balances in the current year and prior year deferral of the 2018 depreciation study in Idaho compared to current year amortization, partially offset by current year allocation adjustment for Oregon incremental depreciation of certain coal units and Oregon deferral associated with the depreciation of certain wind-powered generating facilities.

Property and other taxes decreased $18 million, or 8%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower property tax rates in Utah.

Allowance for borrowed and equity funds increased $28 million, or 38%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher qualified construction work-in-progress balances and higher rates.

Interest and dividend income increased $20 million, or 83%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to the recording of interest on the 2021 Oregon PCAM deferral and higher investment income due to higher average interest rates.

Other, net decreased$23 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies driven by market declines, unfavorable change in deferred compensation and long-term incentive plan primarily due to market movements (offset in operations and maintenance expense) and higher pension costs primarily due to lower expected return on net assets.

Income tax benefit decreased $17 million, or 22%, for 2022 compared to 2021. The effective tax rate was (7)% and (10)% for 2022 and 2021, respectively. The effective tax rate increased primarily as a result of lower effects of ratemaking associated with excess deferred income tax amortization and an increase to the valuation allowance for state net operating losses, partially offset by increased PTCs from PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities in the current year.

185


Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

Utility margin decreased $86 million (including the $231 million of fully offsetting decreases) for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to:
$111 million of higher purchased electricity costs due to higher average prices, partially offset by lower volumes;
$6499 million of lower average retail rates,revenue primarily due to product mix;
$55$234 million of lower DSM program revenue (offsetfully offset in operationsdepreciation expense, income tax expense, fuel expense, and maintenance expense), primarily driven by the recently implemented Utah Sustainable Transportation and Energy Plan ("STEP") program; and
$31 million of higher coal costsother income (expense) due to higher volumesaccelerated depreciation of certain coal-fueled units in Utah and prices.

OperationsOregon and maintenance decreased $52 million, or 5%, for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to a decreaserecognition of certain Utah regulatory balances in DSM program expense (offset in revenues) of $55 million driven by the establishment of the Utah STEP programprior year, and lower pension expense due to a current year plan change. These decreases wereaverage retail prices, partially offset by higher injuryretail customer volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 3.1% due to an increase in residential and damage expenses,commercial customer usage, increase in the average number of customers and favorable impacts of weather, primarily in Oregon, Washington and Idaho;
$88 million of higher natural gas-fueled generation costs primarily due to higher average prices and higher volumes; and
$34 million of lower other revenue due to prior year recognition of previously deferred other revenue in Oregon that was used to accelerate the depreciation of certain retired wind equipment as a result of the 2020 Oregon RAC settlement (offset in depreciation expense).
The decreases above were partially offset by:
$141 million primarily from higher deferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms;
$43 million of favorable wheeling activities;
$33 million of lower coal-fueled generation costs primarily due to $37 million of accelerated recognition of certain Utah regulatory balances associated with the 2015 Utah mine disposition and certain Cholla Unit 4 related closure costs in Oregon and Idaho (offset in income tax expense) in the prior year and lower prices, partially offset by higher volumes;
$19 million of higher other revenue primarily due to higher REC, fly ash and by-product revenues; and
$7 million of higher wholesale revenue due to higher average wholesale market prices, partially offset by lower wholesale volumes.

Operations and maintenance decreased $178 million, or 15%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to prior year accrual forestimated losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $136 million, net of expected insurance proceedsrecoveries, changes in how obligations associated with the implementation of the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met, lower thermal plant maintenance expense and current year settlements,lower labor expenses, partially offset by higher wind plant and distribution maintenance and higher labor costs for storm damage restoration.legal and insurance expenses associated with the 2020 Wildfires.


Depreciation and amortization increased $26decreased $121 million, or 3%10%, for 20172021 compared to 20162020 primarily due to prior year accelerated depreciation of $376 million as a result of regulatory adjustments ordered by the UPSC, the OPUC and the IPUC (fully offset in retail revenue, other revenue, and income tax expense), including accelerated depreciation of certain coal-fueled units and Oregon's share of certain retired wind equipment as a result the 2020 Oregon RAC settlement, partially offset by the impacts of the depreciation study for which rates became effective January 1, 2021 of approximately $158 million and higher plant in-service balances.

Property and other taxes increased $4 million, or 2%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher plant-in-service.property taxes in Oregon and Wyoming, partially offset by lower property taxes in Utah and Washington.


Taxes, other than income taxes Interest expense increased $7$4 million, or 4%1%, for 20172021 compared to 20162020 primarily due to higher assessed property values.average long-term debt balances, partially offset by a lower weighted average long-term debt interest rate.


Allowance for borrowed and equity fundsdecreased $11$72 million, or 26%49%, for 20172021 compared to 20162020 primarily due to a true-up of AFUDC rates.lower qualified construction work-in-progress balances.


Interest and dividend income increased $14 million, or 140%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher carrying charges on DSM regulatory assets in the current year.

186


Income tax expensebenefit increased $20$4 million, or 6%,5% for 20172021 compared to 2016 and the2020. The effective tax rate was 32%(10)% and 31%(11)% for 20172021 and 2016,2020, respectively. The effective tax rate increased primarily due to lower production tax credits associated with PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities as a result of the expirationlower effects of the 10-year productionratemaking associated with excess deferred income tax credit periods for certainamortization, offset by increased PTCs from PacifiCorp's new wind-powered generating facilities of which 243 MW and 100 MW of net owned capacity expired in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Gross margin increased $86 million, or 3%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to:
$71the current year. In 2020, $118 million of lower purchased electricity costs primarily due to lower average market prices;
$57 million of higher retail revenues primarily due to higher retail rates;
$37 million of lower coal costs primarily due to decreased generation of $95 million, partially offset by higher average unit costs of $31 million and charges related to damaged longwall mining equipment of $20 million; and
$22 million of lower natural gas costs due to lower market prices, partially offset by increased generation.
The increases above were partially offset by:
$90 million of lower wholesale electricity revenue due to lower volumes and prices.

Operations and maintenance decreased $18 million, or 2%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to lower plant maintenance costs associated with reduced generation and lower labor and benefit costs due to lower headcount, partially offset by a Washington rate case decision disallowing returns on recent selective catalytic reduction projects.

Depreciation and amortization increased $13 million, or 2%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to higher plant in-service.

Taxes, other thanexcess deferred income taxes increased $5 million,was amortized pursuant to regulatory orders from Utah, Oregon and Idaho, whereby portions of excess deferred income taxes were used to accelerate depreciation of certain coal-fueled units and Oregon's share of certain retired wind equipment or 3%,offset other regulatory balances for 2016 compared to 2015 due to higher property taxes primarily from higher assessed property values.these jurisdictions.


Allowance for borrowed and equity funds decreased $9 million, or 18%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to lower qualified construction work-in-progress balances.

Income tax expense increased $12 million, or 4%, for 2016 compared to 2015 and the effective tax rate was 31% and 32% for 2016 and 2015, respectively. The decrease in the effective tax rate is due to higher production tax credits associated with PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp's total net liquidity was as follows (in millions):

Cash and cash equivalents $14
   
Credit facilities(1)
 1,000
Less:  
Short-term debt (80)
Tax-exempt bond support (130)
Net credit facilities 790
   
Total net liquidity $804
   
Credit facilities:  
Maturity dates 2020

(1)Cash and cash equivalents$641 
Refer to Note 6Credit facility(1)
1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding PacifiCorp'scredit(249)
Net credit facilities.facility951 
Total net liquidity$1,592 
Credit facility:
Maturity date2025

(1)Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and "Credit Facilities" below for further discussion regarding PacifiCorp's credit facilities.

Operating Activities


Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $1.6$1.82 billion and $1.6$1.80 billion, respectively. Positive varianceThe increase is primarily due to higher collections from a prior year paymentretail customers, collateral received from counterparties, transmission deposits and cash received for USA Power litigation,income taxes, partially offset by higher receipts fromfuel, wholesale and retail customersmaterial and lower fuel payments, offset by current year higher cash payments for purchased power, income taxes and pension contributions.supplies purchases.


Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $1.6$1.8 billion and $1.7$1.6 billion, respectively. The change wasincrease is primarily due to higher cash paidreceived for income taxes payment for USA Power litigation and lower receiptshigher collections from wholesale electricity sales,retail customers, partially offset by lower purchased electricity payments, lower fuel payments, higher receipts from retail customerswholesale purchases and lower cash collateral posted for derivative contracts.timing of operating payables.



PacifiCorp's income tax cash flows benefited in 2017, 2016, and 2015 from 50% bonus depreciation on qualifying assets placed in service and from production tax credits earned on qualifying projects. In December 2017, the 2017 Tax Reform was enacted which, among other items, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and eliminates bonus depreciation on qualifying regulated utility assets acquired after September 27, 2017, but did not impact production tax credits. PacifiCorp will be proposing to reduce customer rates for a portion of the lower annual income tax expense resulting from the decrease in federal tax rates, and deferring the remainder to offset other costs as approved by the regulatory bodies. PacifiCorp expects lower revenue and income taxes as well as lower bonus depreciation benefits as a result of the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment. PacifiCorp does not expect the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment to have a material adverse impact on its cash flows, subject to actual regulatory outcomes. Refer to Regulatory Matters in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory matters associated with the 2017 Tax Reform. The timing of PacifiCorp's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.


Investing Activities


Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $(729) million$(2.2) billion and $(869) million,$(1.5) billion, respectively. The changeincrease in net cash outflows from investing activities is mainly reflects a current year decreasedue to an increase in capital expenditures of $134$653 million.


Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $(869) million$(1.5) billion and $(918) million,$(2.5) billion, respectively. The change primarily reflects, a current yeardecrease in net distributioncash outflows from an affiliate of $26 million, a prior year service territory acquisition of $23 million, andinvesting activities is mainly due to a decrease in capital expenditures of $13 million, partially offset by a prior year equipment sale to an affiliate of $13 million.$1.0 billion.


187


Financing Activities


Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities


RegulatoryAs of December 31, 2022, regulatory authorities limitlimited PacifiCorp to $1.5 billion of short-term debt. In January 2023, updated regulatory authorization provided PacifiCorp with an increased limit to $2.0 billion of short-term debt. As of December 31, 2017,2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had $80 million ofno short-term debt outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 1.83%, and as of December 31, 2016, had $270 million of short-term debt outstanding at a weighted average interest rate of 0.96%.outstanding. For further discussion, refer to Note 67 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


Long-term Debt


In December 2022, PacifiCorp currently has regulatory authority from the OPUC and the IPUC to issue an additional $1.325issued $1.1 billion of long-term debt.its 5.350% First Mortgage Bonds due December 2053. PacifiCorp must makeintends within 24 months of the issuance date to allocate an amount equal to the net proceeds to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, new or existing investments or expenditures made in one or more eligible projects in alignment with BHE's Green Financing Framework. Proceeds will not knowingly be allocated to the same portion of a notice filing withproject that received allocation of proceeds under any other Green Financing Instrument; activities related to the WUTC priorexploration, production, transportation, or consumption of fossil fuels; or activities related to any future issuance. PacifiCorp currently has an effective shelf registration statement with the SEC to issue up to $1.325 billion additional first mortgage bonds through January 2019.nuclear energy.


PacifiCorp made repayments on long-term debt excluding repayments for lease obligations, totaling $52$155 million and $66$870 million during the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.

As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp had $216 million of letters of credit providing credit enhancement and liquidity support for variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations totaling $213 million plus interest. These letters of credit were fully available as of December 31, 2017 and expire periodically through March 2019.


PacifiCorp's Mortgage and Deed of Trust creates a lien on most of PacifiCorp's electric utility property, allowing the issuance of bonds based on a percentage of utility property additions, bond credits arising from retirement of previously outstanding bonds or deposits of cash. The amount of bonds that PacifiCorp may issue generally is also subject to a net earnings test. As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp estimated it would be able to issue up to $10.1$8.5 billion of new first mortgage bonds under the most restrictive issuance test in the mortgage. Any issuances are subject to market conditions and amounts may beare further limited by regulatory authorizations or commitments or by covenants and tests contained in other financing agreements. PacifiCorp also has the ability to release property from the lien of the mortgage on the basis of property additions, bond credits or deposits of cash.


Credit Facilities

In June 2022, PacifiCorp amended and restated its existing $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2024. The amendment extended the expiration date to June 2025 and amended pricing from the London Interbank Offered Rate to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp entered into an additional $800 million 364-day unsecured credit facility expiring in January 2024.

Debt Authorizations

PacifiCorp currently has regulatory authority from the OPUC and the IPUC to issue an additional $900 million of long-term debt. PacifiCorp must make a notice filing with the WUTC prior to any future issuance. PacifiCorp currently has an effective shelf registration statement with the SEC to issue an indeterminate amount of first mortgage bonds through September 2023.

Preferred Stock


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, PacifiCorp had non-redeemable preferred stock outstanding with an aggregate stated value of $2 million.



Common Shareholder's Equity


In February 2018,2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp declared a dividendand paid dividends of $250$100 million and $150 million, respectively, to PPW Holdings LLC.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp declared dividends of $300 million payable to PPW Holdings LLC in March 2018.February 2023.


In 2017 and 2016, PacifiCorp declared and paid dividends of $600 million and $875 million, respectively, to PPW Holdings LLC.
188



Capitalization


PacifiCorp manages its capitalization and liquidity position to maintain a prudent capital structure with anthe objective of retaining strong investment grade credit ratings, which is expected to facilitate continuing access to flexible borrowing arrangements at favorable costs and rates. This objective, subject to periodic review and revision, attempts to balance the interests of all shareholders, customers and creditors and provide a competitive cost of capital and predictable capital market access.


Under existing or prospective authoritative accounting guidance, such as guidance pertaining to consolidations and leases, it is possible that new purchase power and gas agreements, transmission arrangements or amendments to existing arrangements may be accounted for as capital lease obligations or debt on PacifiCorp's financial statements. While PacifiCorp has successfully amended covenants in financing arrangements that may be impacted, it may be more difficult for PacifiCorp to comply with its capitalization targets or regulatory commitments concerning minimum levels of common equity as a percentage of capitalization. This may lead PacifiCorp to seek amendments or waivers under financing agreements and from regulators, delay or reduce dividends or spending programs, seek additional new equity contributions from its indirect parent company, BHE, or take other actions.


Future Uses of Cash


PacifiCorp has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the issuance of commercial paper, the use of unsecured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which PacifiCorp has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including PacifiCorp's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with PacifiCorp and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.


Capital Expenditures


PacifiCorp has significant future capital requirements. Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, impacts to customer rates; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings;proceedings, including regulatory filings for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; new customer requests; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital.


Historical and forecast capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):

HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Wind generation$1,278 $131 $37 $797 $422 $302 
Electric distribution603 608 678 658 536 894 
Electric transmission415 325 1,208 1,431 1,120 1,586 
Solar generation— — — 24 93 286 
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage— 32 105 361 
Other244 444 235 637 793 557 
Total$2,540 $1,513 $2,166 $3,579 $3,069 $3,986 

189


 Historical Forecast
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
            
Transmission system investment$137
 $94
 $115
 $135
 $305
 $438
Environmental114
 58
 27
 19
 16
 21
Wind investment
 110
 11
 547
 974
 741
Operating and other665
 641
 616
 511
 805
 602
Total$916
 $903
 $769
 $1,212
 $2,100
 $1,802


PacifiCorp's 2021 IRP identified a roadmap for a significant increase in renewable and carbon free generation resources, coal-to-natural gas conversion of certain coal-fueled units, energy storage and associated transmission. PacifiCorp's 2021 IRP identified over 1,800 MWs of new wind-powered generation, over 2,100 MWs of new solar-powered generation and nearly 700 MWs of new battery storage capacity that are expected to be online by 2025. PacifiCorp anticipates that the additional new wind-powered generation will be a mixture of owned and contracted resources. PacifiCorp has included an estimate for these new generation resources and associated transmission in its forecast capital expenditures for 2023 through 2025. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. PacifiCorp's historical and forecast capital expenditures include the following:


Transmission system investment primarily reflects main grid reinforcement costsWind generation includes both growth projects and costsoperating expenditures. Growth projects include construction of new wind-powered generating facilities and construction at existing wind-powered generating facility sites acquired from third parties totaling $23 million for 2022, $118 million for 2021 and $1,148 million for 2020. PacifiCorp placed in-service 516 MWs of new wind-powered generating facilities in 2021 and 674 MWs in 2020. Planned spending for the 140-mile 500 kV Aeolus-Bridger/Anticline transmission line, a major segmentconstruction of PacifiCorp's Energy Gateway Transmission Expansion Programadditional new wind-powered generating facilities and those at acquired sites totals $771 million in 2023, $385 million in 2024 and $251 million in 2025 and is primarily for projects totaling approximately 683 MWs that are expected to be placed in-service in 2020. Planned spending2023 through 2025.
Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Operating expenditures includes spend on wildfire mitigation. Expenditures for the Aeolus-Bridger/Anticline line totals $40these items totaled $135 million in 2018, $2202022, $54 million in 20192021 and $346 million in 2020.

Environmental includes the installation of new or the replacement of existing emissions control equipment at certain generating facilities, including installation or upgrade of selective catalytic reduction control systems and low nitrogen oxide burners to reduce nitrogen oxides, mercury emissions control systems, as well as expenditures for the management of coal combustion residuals and effluent limitation.

2016 and 2017 wind investment includes costs for new wind plant construction projects and repowering of certain existing wind plants. The repowering projects entail the replacement of significant components of older turbines. Planned spending for the repowering totals $347 million in 2018, $553 million in 2019 and $153$28 million in 2020, and planned spending totals $90 million in 2023, $124 million in 2024 and $127 million in 2025. The remaining investments primarily relate to expenditures for new connections and distribution operations.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Transmission growth investments primarily reflects costs associated with Energy Gateway Transmission projects. Expenditures for these projects totaled $944 million for 2022, $94 million for 2021 and $56 million for 2020. Forecast expenditures for Energy Gateway projects include planned costs for the new wind-powered generating facilities totals $200 million in 2018, $421 million in 2019following Energy Gateway Transmission segments:
416-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Aeolus substation near Medicine Bow, Wyoming and $588 million in 2020, plus approximately $300 million for an assumed vendor supplied financing transactionthe Clover substation near Mona, Utah;
59-mile, 230-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Windstar substation near Glenrock, Wyoming and the Aeolus substation;
290-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line from the Longhorn substation near Boardman, Oregon to be paid in 2020 that is not includedthe Hemingway substation near Boise, Idaho;
14-mile, 345-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Oquirrh substation in the table above. The repowering projectsSalt Lake Valley and the Terminal substation near the Salt Lake City Airport;
40-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Limber substation in central Utah and the Terminal substation; and
195-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Anticline substation near Point of Rocks, Wyoming and the Populus substation in Downey, Idaho.
Planned spending for these Energy Gateway Transmission segments that are expected to be placed in-service at various dates in 20192024 through 2028 totals $1,005 million in 2023, $661 million in 2024 and 2020.$763 million in 2025. The remaining investments primarily relate to expenditures for transmission operations, including wildfire mitigation, generation interconnection requests and other Energy Gateway Transmission segments.
Solar generation includes growth projects. Planned spending for the construction of new wind-powered generating facilitiessolar projects will add approximately 377 MWs of new generation and are also expected to be placed in-service in 2020. The energy production2026.
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage includes growth projects. Planned spending for the construction of storage projects from the repowered and new wind-powered generating facilities is2023 through 2025 includes $319 million for battery storage projects providing approximately 419 MWs of storage that are expected to qualifybe placed in-service in 2026 and $79 million for 100%the construction of 38 MWs of new pumped hydro storage on the federal renewable electricity production tax credit availableNorth Umpqua River system expected to be placed in-service in 2024 and 2026. The remaining investments relate to planned spending on projects that are expected to be placed in-service beyond 2026.
Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Expenditures for 10 years once the equipment is placed in-service.

Remaininginformation technology totaled $155 million in 2022, $108 million in 2021 and $75 million for 2020. Planned information technology spending totals $224 million in 2023, $181 million in 2024 and $232 million in 2025. The remaining investments relate to operating projects that consist of routine expenditures for generation transmission, distribution and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand, including upgradesdemand.
190



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

From time to customer meterstime, PacifiCorp enters into arrangements in Oregon, California, Utah,the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties that involve guarantees or similar arrangements. PacifiCorp currently has indemnification obligations in connection with the sale or transfer of certain assets. In addition, PacifiCorp evaluates potential obligations that arise out of variable interests in unconsolidated entities, determined in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. PacifiCorp believes that the likelihood that it would be required to perform or otherwise incur any significant losses associated with any of these obligations is remote. Refer to Notes 11 and Idaho.19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information on these obligations and arrangements.



Obligations and Commitments

Material Cash Requirements
Contractual Obligations


PacifiCorp has contractual cash obligationsrequirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition. The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's material contractualcondition that arise primarily from long-term debt (refer to Note 8), certain commitments and contingencies (refer to Note 14), cost of removal and AROs (refer to Notes 6 and 11). Refer to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

PacifiCorp has cash obligations asrequirements relating to interest payments of December 31, 2017 (in millions):$8.0 billion on long-term debt, including $449 million due in 2023.


 Payments Due By Periods
 2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 2023 and Thereafter Total
          
Long-term debt, including interest:         
Fixed-rate obligations$855
 $974
 $1,609
 $8,006
 $11,444
Variable-rate obligations(1)
91
 47
 8
 226
 372
Short-term debt, including interest80
 
 
 
 80
Capital leases, including interest4
 7
 8
 18
 37
Operating leases and easements7
 14
 13
 97
 131
Asset retirement obligations25
 31
 40
 335
 431
Power purchase agreements - commercially operable(2):
         
Electricity commodity contracts231
 242
 223
 871
 1,567
Electricity capacity contracts37
 70
 60
 655
 822
Electricity mixed contracts8
 14
 12
 48
 82
Power purchase agreements - non-commercially operable(2)
9
 44
 53
 451
 557
Transmission112
 162
 88
 428
 790
Fuel purchase agreements(2):
         
Natural gas supply and transportation40
 56
 53
 233
 382
Coal supply and transportation655
 1,154
 737
 1,035
 3,581
Other purchase obligations121
 88
 39
 80
 328
Other long-term liabilities(3)
15
 18
 13
 65
 111
Total contractual cash obligations$2,290
 $2,921
 $2,956
 $12,548
 $20,715

(1)Consists of principal and interest for tax-exempt bond obligations with interest rates scheduled to reset periodically prior to maturity. Future variable interest rates are assumed to equal December 31, 2017 rates. Refer to "Interest Rate Risk" in Item 7A of this Form 10-K for additional discussion related to variable-rate liabilities.
(2)Commodity contracts are agreements for the delivery of energy. Capacity contracts are agreements that provide rights to energy output, generally of a specified generating facility. Forecasted or other applicable estimated prices were used to determine total dollar value of the commitments. PacifiCorp has several contracts for purchases of electricity from facilities that have not yet achieved commercial operation. To the extent any of these facilities do not achieve commercial operation, PacifiCorp has no obligation to the counterparty.
(3)Includes environmental and hydroelectric relicensing commitments recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets that are contractually or legally binding. Excludes regulatory liabilities and employee benefit plan obligations that are not legally or contractually fixed as to timing and amount. Deferred income taxes are excluded since cash payments are based primarily on taxable income for each year. Uncertain tax positions are also excluded because the amounts and timing of cash payments are not certain.

Regulatory Matters


PacifiCorp is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussioninformation regarding PacifiCorp's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.



Environmental Laws and Regulations


PacifiCorp is subject to federal, state local and foreignlocal laws and regulations regarding air andquality, climate change, water quality, RPS, emissions performance standards, climate change, coal combustion byproductash disposal, hazardouswildfire prevention and solid waste disposal, protected speciesmitigation and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact PacifiCorp's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state local and internationallocal agencies. PacifiCorp believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and PacifiCorp is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.


Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for additional informationfurther discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for PacifiCorp's forecast environmental-related capital expenditures.regulations.


Collateral and Contingent Features


Debt and preferred securities of PacifiCorp are rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of PacifiCorp's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt or preferred securities. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time. As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.


PacifiCorp has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. PacifiCorp's unsecured revolving credit facilities do not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level to draw upon their availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facilities are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities. Certain authorizations or exemptions by regulatory commissions for the issuance of securities are valid as long as PacifiCorp maintains investment grade ratings on senior secured debt. A downgrade below that level would necessitate new regulatory applications and approvals.


191


In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in PacifiCorp's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp would have been required to post $233$433 million of additional collateral. PacifiCorp's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, outstanding accounts payable and receivable or other factors. Refer to Note 1112 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of PacifiCorp's collateral requirements specific to PacifiCorp's derivative contracts.


Limitations

In addition to PacifiCorp's capital structure objectives, its debt capacity is also governed by its contractual and regulatory commitments.

PacifiCorp's revolving credit and other financing agreements contain customary covenants and default provisions, including a covenant not to exceed a specified debt-to-capitalization ratio of 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each fiscal quarter. Management believes that PacifiCorp could have borrowed an additional $6.9 billion as of December 31, 2017 without exceeding this threshold. Any additional borrowings would be subject to market conditions, and amounts may be further limited by regulatory authorizations or by covenants and tests contained in other financing agreements.


The state regulatory orders that authorized BHE's acquisition of PacifiCorp contain restrictions on PacifiCorp's ability to pay dividends to the extent that they would reduce PacifiCorp's common equity below specified percentages of defined capitalization. As of December 31, 2017, the most restrictive of these commitments prohibits PacifiCorp from making any distribution to PPW Holdings LLC or BHE without prior state regulatory approval to the extent that it would reduce PacifiCorp's common stock equity below 44% of its total capitalization, excluding short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt. The terms of this commitment treat 50% of PacifiCorp's remaining balance of preferred stock in existence prior to the acquisition of PacifiCorp by BHE as common equity. As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp's actual common stock equity percentage, as calculated under this measure, was 54%, and management believes that PacifiCorp could have declared a dividend of $2.5 billion under this commitment.

These commitments also restrict PacifiCorp from making any distributions to either PPW Holdings LLC or BHE if PacifiCorp's senior unsecured debt is rated BBB- or lower by Standard & Poor's Rating Services or Fitch Ratings or Baa3 or lower by Moody's Investor Service, as indicated by two of the three rating services. As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp met the minimum required senior unsecured debt ratings for making distributions.

Inflation


Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where PacifiCorp operates have not had a significant impact on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results. PacifiCorp operates under a cost-of-service based raterate-setting structure administered by various state commissions and the FERC. Under this raterate-setting structure, PacifiCorp is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation. PacifiCorp attemptsseeks to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of energy and other cost adjustment clauses and billtariff riders, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and entering into contracts with fixed pricing where possible by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

PacifiCorp from time to time enters into arrangements in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties that involve guarantees or similar arrangements. PacifiCorp currently has indemnification obligations in connection with the sale of certain assets. In addition, PacifiCorp evaluates potential obligations that arise out of variable interests in unconsolidated entities, determined in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. PacifiCorp believes that the likelihood that it would be required to perform or otherwise incur any significant losses associated with any of these obligations is remote. Refer to Notes 10 and 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information on these obligations and arrangements.

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting PacifiCorp, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates


Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by PacifiCorp's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with PacifiCorp's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


PacifiCorp prepares its financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, PacifiCorp defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in rates occur.



PacifiCorp continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit PacifiCorp's ability to recover its costs. PacifiCorp believes theits application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written offrecognized in net income, returned to net incomecustomers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $1.061$1.9 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $3.071$2.9 billion as of December 31, 2017.2022. Refer to Note 56 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's regulatory assets and liabilities.


Derivatives
192



PacifiCorp is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. PacifiCorp is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk as it has an obligation to serve retail customer load in its service territories. PacifiCorp's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. PacifiCorp has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, monitor, report, manage and mitigate each of the various types of risk involved in its business. PacifiCorp employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and, at times, interest rate risk. PacifiCorp does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices and interest rates. As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp had no derivative contracts outstanding related to interest rate risk. Refer to Notes 11 and 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's derivative contracts.

Measurement Principles

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which PacifiCorp transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, PacifiCorp uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent PacifiCorp's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. PacifiCorp bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations, when available, or internally developed and commercial models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations are obtained from independent energy brokers, exchanges, direct communication with market participants and actual transactions executed by PacifiCorp. Market price quotations for certain major electricity and natural gas trading hubs are generally readily obtainable for the first six years; therefore, PacifiCorp's forward price curves for those locations and periods reflect observable market quotes. As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp had a net derivative liability of $104 million related to contracts valued using either quoted prices or forward price curves based upon observable market quotes. Market price quotations for other electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable for the first six years. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, as well as for those contracts that are not actively traded, PacifiCorp uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contracts is a function of underlying forward commodity prices, interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of contracts. The assumptions used in these models are critical because any changes in assumptions could have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of the contracts. As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp had a net derivative asset of $- million related to contracts where PacifiCorp uses internal models with significant unobservable inputs.

Classification and Recognition Methodology

PacifiCorp's derivative contracts are probable of inclusion in rates and changes in the estimated fair value of derivative contracts are generally recorded as regulatory assets. Accordingly, amounts are generally not recognized in earnings until the contracts are settled and the forecasted transaction has occurred. As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp had $101 million recorded as a regulatory asset related to derivative contracts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits


PacifiCorp sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans that cover the majority of its employees. In addition, PacifiCorp contributes to a joint trustee pension plan for benefits offered to certain bargaining units.as described in Note 10. PacifiCorp recognizes the funded status of itsthese defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Funded status is the fair value of plan assets minus the benefit obligation as of the measurement date. As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp recognized a net liabilityasset totaling $139$57 million for the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As of December 31, 2017,2022, amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that were included in net regulatory assets and accumulated other comprehensive loss totaled $407$255 million and $20$12 million, respectively.


The expense and benefit obligations relating to these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are based on actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. These key assumptions are reviewed annually and modified as appropriate. PacifiCorp believes that the key assumptions utilized in recording obligations under the plans are reasonable based on prior plan experience and current market and economic conditions. Refer to Note 910 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosures about PacifiCorp's defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the key assumptions used to calculate the funded status and net periodic benefit cost for these plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.


PacifiCorp chooses a discount rate based upon high quality debt security investment yields in effect as of the measurement date that correspondswith cash flows aligning to the expected benefit period. The pensiontiming and other postretirement benefit liabilities increase as the discount rate is reduced.amount of plan liabilities.


In establishing its assumption as to the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, PacifiCorp evaluates the investment allocation between return-seeking investment and fixed income securities based on the funded status of the plan and utilizes the asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on forward-looking views of the financial markets and historical performance. Pension and other postretirement benefits expense increases as the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets decreases. PacifiCorp regularly reviews its actual asset allocations and rebalances its investments to its targeted allocations when considered appropriate.


The key assumptions used may differ materially from period to period due to changing market and economic conditions. These differences may result in a significant impact to pension and other postretirement benefits expense and the funded status. If changes were to occur for the following key assumptions, the approximate effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements would be as follows (in millions):

Other Postretirement
Pension PlansBenefit Plan
+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%
Effect on December 31, 2022 Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate$(25)$26 $(8)$
Effect on 2022 Periodic Cost:
Discount rate$$(1)$$(1)
Expected rate of return on plan assets(5)(2)
   Other Postretirement
 Pension Plans Benefit Plan
 +0.5% -0.5% +0.5% -0.5%
        
Effect on December 31, 2017 Benefit Obligations:       
Discount rate$(65) $71
 $(14) $16
        
Effect on 2017 Periodic Cost:       
Discount rate$
 $(1) $1
 $
Expected rate of return on plan assets(5) 5
 (1) 1


A variety of factors affect the funded status of the plans, including asset returns, discount rates, mortality assumptions, plan changes and PacifiCorp's funding policy for each plan.



193


Income Taxes


In determining PacifiCorp's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by PacifiCorp's various regulatory jurisdictions.commissions. PacifiCorp's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. PacifiCorp recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of PacifiCorp's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, PacifiCorp believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations if any, is not expected to have a material impact on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results. Refer to Note 89 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's income taxes.


It is probable that PacifiCorp will pass income tax benefitsbenefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to its customers.customers in certain state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2017,2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $1.96$1.2 billion and will primarily be included in regulated rates whenover the temporary differences reverse.estimated useful lives of the related properties.


Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue


Revenue is recognized as electricity is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $255$301 million as of December 31, 2017.2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month and actual revenue is recorded based on subsequent meter readings.


Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Wildfire Loss Contingencies

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, PacifiCorp is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the wildfires. In determining this exposure, PacifiCorp is required to assess whether the likelihood of loss for each of the wildfires and lawsuits is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with various parties. If deemed reasonably possible, PacifiCorp is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts. If deemed probable, PacifiCorp is required to accrue a loss if reasonably estimable based on the bottom end of the range if no amount within the range of estimated loss is any better than another amount. Many assumptions and variables are involved in determining these estimates, including identifying the various categories of potential loss such as fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. Within the categories of potential loss, further assumptions are made regarding items such as the types of structures damaged, estimated replacement values associated with those structures, value of personal property, the types of natural resource damage such as timber, the value of that timber, the nature of noneconomic damages such as those arising from personal injuries, other damages PacifiCorp may be responsible for if found negligent such as punitive damages, and the amount of any penalties or fines that may be imposed by governmental entities. Refer to Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's loss contingencies associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney fire.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

PacifiCorp's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. PacifiCorp's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which PacifiCorp transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with PacifiCorp's business activities. PacifiCorp has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Notes 2 and 1112 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's contracts accounted for as derivatives.

194


Risk Management


PacifiCorp has a risk management committee that is responsible for the oversight of market and credit risk relating to the commodity transactions of PacifiCorp. To limit PacifiCorp's exposure to market and credit risk, the risk management committee recommends, and executive management establishes, policies, limits and approved products, which are reviewed frequently to respond to changing market conditions.


Risk is an inherent part of PacifiCorp's business and activities. PacifiCorp has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, monitor, report, manage and mitigatereport on each of the various types of risk involved in PacifiCorp's business. The risk management policy governs energy transactions and is designed for hedging PacifiCorp's existing energy and asset exposures, and to a limited extent, the policy permits arbitrage and trading activities to take advantage of market inefficiencies. The policy also governs the types of transactions authorized for use and establishes guidelines for credit risk management and management information systems required to effectively monitor such transactions. PacifiCorp's risk management policy provides for the use of only those contracts that have a similar volume or price relationship to its portfolio of assets, liabilities or anticipated transactions.



Commodity Price Risk


PacifiCorp is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk as PacifiCorp has an obligation to serve retail customer load in its service territories. PacifiCorp's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. PacifiCorp does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, PacifiCorp uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. PacifiCorp does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. PacifiCorp's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in rates, which is subject to regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.

PacifiCorp measures, monitors and manages the market risk in its electricity and natural gas portfolio daily, utilizing a historical Value-at-Risk ("VaR") approach and other measurements of net position. PacifiCorp also monitors its portfolio exposure to market risk in comparison to established thresholds and measures its open positions subject to price risk in terms of quantity at each delivery location for each forward time period. VaR computations for thePacifiCorp has a risk management policy that requires increasing volumes of hedge transactions over a three-year position management and hedging horizon to reduce market risk of its electricity and natural gas commodity portfolio are based on a historical simulation technique, utilizing historical price changes over a specified (holding) period to simulate potential forward energy market price curve movements to estimate the potential unfavorable impact of such price changes on the portfolio positions. The quantification of market risk using VaR provides a consistent measure of risk across PacifiCorp's continually changing portfolio. VaR represents an estimate of possible changes at a given level of confidence in fair value that would be measured on its portfolio assuming hypothetical movements in forward market prices and is not necessarily indicative of actual results that may occur.

PacifiCorp's VaR computations utilize several key assumptions. The calculation includes short-term commodity contracts, the expected resource and demand obligations from PacifiCorp's long-term contracts, the expected generation levels from PacifiCorp's generation assets and the expected retail and wholesale load levels. The portfolio reflects flexibility contained in contracts and assets, which accommodate the normal variability in PacifiCorp's demand obligations and generation availability. These contracts and assets are valued to reflect the variability PacifiCorp experiences as a load-serving entity. Contracts or assets that contain flexible elements are often referred to as having embedded options or option characteristics. These options provide for energy volume changes that are sensitive to market price changes. Therefore, changes in the option values affect the energy position of the portfolio with respect to market prices, and this effect is calculated daily. When measuring portfolio exposure through VaR, these position changes that result from the option sensitivity are held constant through the historical simulation. PacifiCorp's VaR methodology is based on a 36-month forward position, 95% confidence interval and one-day holding period.

As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp's estimated potential one-day unfavorable impact on fair value of the electricity and natural gas commodity portfolio over the next 36 months was $10 million, as measured by the VaR computations described above. The minimum, average and maximum daily VaR (one-day holding periods) were as follows for the year ended December 31 (in millions):

 2017
Minimum VaR (measured)$6
Average VaR (calculated)8
Maximum VaR (measured)14


PacifiCorp maintained compliance with its VaRrisk management policy and limit procedures during the year ended December 31, 2017. Changes in markets inconsistent with historical trends or assumptions used could cause actual results to exceed estimated VaR levels.2022.


Fair Value of Derivatives


The table that follows summarizes PacifiCorp's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives, excluding collateral netting of $74$(78) million and $69$5 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions):

Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
 Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$270 $381 $159 
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$53 $104 $

195

 Fair Value - Estimated Fair Value after
  Net Asset Hypothetical Change in Price
 (Liability) 10% increase 10% decrease
As of December 31, 2017:     
Total commodity derivative contracts$(104) $(102) $(106)
      
As of December 31, 2016     
Total commodity derivative contracts$(77) $(59) $(95)


PacifiCorp's commodity derivative contracts are generally recoverable from customers in rates; therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose PacifiCorp to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, a regulatory assetliability of $101$270 million and $73$53 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liabilityasset of $104$270 million and $77$53 million, respectively. Consolidated financial results would be negatively impacted if the costs of wholesale electricity, natural gas or fuel are higher or the level of wholesale electricity sales are lower than what is included in rates, including the impacts of adjustment mechanisms.


Interest Rate Risk


PacifiCorp is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. PacifiCorp manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, PacifiCorp's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose PacifiCorp to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if PacifiCorp were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. PacifiCorp may from timehas the ability to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate PacifiCorp's exposure to interest rate risk. The nature and amount of PacifiCorp's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 6, 7, 8 and 1213 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of PacifiCorp's short- and long-term debt.


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, PacifiCorp had short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $442$218 million and $662 million, respectively that expose PacifiCorp to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. The market risk related to PacifiCorp's variable-rate debt as of December 31, 20172022 is not hedged. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on PacifiCorp's consolidated annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


Credit Risk


PacifiCorp is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent PacifiCorp's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, PacifiCorp analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, PacifiCorp enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, PacifiCorp exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.



As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp's aggregate credit exposure fromwith wholesale activities totaled $127 million, based on settlementenergy supply and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral. As of December 31, 2017, $125 million, or 98.5%, of PacifiCorp's credit exposure was withmarketing counterparties included counterparties having investmentnon-investment grade, internally rated credit ratings by either Moody's Investor Service or Standard & Poor's Rating Services. Asratings. Substantially all of December 31, 2017, three counterparties comprised $91 million, or 72%, of the aggregate credit exposure. The threethese non-investment grade, internally rated counterparties are rated investment grade by Moody's Investor Serviceassociated with long-duration solar and Standard & Poor's Rating Services,wind power purchase agreements, some of which are from facilities that have not yet achieved commercial operation and for which PacifiCorp ishas no obligation should the facilities not aware of any factors that would likely result in a downgrade of the counterparties' credit ratings to below investment grade over the remaining term of transactions outstanding as of December 31, 2017.achieve commercial operation.



196


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data




197


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
PacifiCorp
Portland, Oregon
Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PacifiCorp and subsidiaries ("PacifiCorp") as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the CompanyPacifiCorp as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'sPacifiCorp's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company'sPacifiCorp's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the CompanyPacifiCorp in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The CompanyPacifiCorp is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sPacifiCorp's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

PacifiCorp is subject to rate regulation by state public service commissions as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where PacifiCorp operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

198


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow PacifiCorp an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While PacifiCorp has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit PacifiCorp's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, and (3) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated PacifiCorp's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected PacifiCorp's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.

Wildfires – Contingencies – Refer to Note 14 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, PacifiCorp is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire (the "Wildfires"). In determining this exposure, PacifiCorp is required to determine whether the likelihood of loss for each of the Wildfires is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the Wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with claimants.

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If deemed reasonably possible, PacifiCorp is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts.

Management has recorded estimated liabilities of $424 million and receivables of $246 million, which represent its best estimate of probable losses and expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, PacifiCorp recognized probable losses net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively. Management has disclosed reasonably possible estimated losses of $31 million, net of potential insurance recoveries of $103 million, associated with the 2022 McKinney Fire.

199


We identified wildfire-related contingencies and the related disclosures as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to determine the probability of loss and estimate the probable or reasonably possible losses and insurance recoveries. This required the application of a high degree of judgment and extensive effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's judgments, estimates and disclosures related to wildfire-related loss contingencies.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management's judgments regarding the probability of loss, estimated losses and insurance recoveries, and related disclosures for wildfire-related contingencies included the following, among others:
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether a loss was probable or reasonably possible for the Wildfires by inquiring of management and PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding the likelihood and amounts of probable and reasonably possible losses, including the potential impact of information gained through investigations into the cause of the fires, information from claimants, the advice of legal counsel, and reading external information for any evidence that might contradict management's assertions.
We evaluated the estimation methodology for determining the amount of probable and reasonably possible losses through inquiries with management and external and internal legal counsel, and we tested the significant assumptions used in the estimates of probable and reasonably possible losses.
We read legal letters from PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding known information and evaluated whether the information therein was consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether related insurance recoveries were probable of collection by inquiring of management and PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding the amounts of insurance recoveries recorded or disclosed. With the assistance of our insurance specialists, we tested the significant assumptions used in the determination of collectability, including obtaining and reading related policies to determine whether the types of insurance claims are included or excluded from coverage.
We evaluated whether PacifiCorp's disclosures were appropriate and consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Portland, Oregon
February 23, 201824, 2023


We have served as PacifiCorp's auditor since 2006.



200


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$641 $179 
Trade receivables, net825 725 
Other receivables, net72 52 
Inventories474 474 
Derivative contracts184 76 
Regulatory assets275 65 
Other current assets213 150 
Total current assets2,684 1,721 
Property, plant and equipment, net24,430 22,914 
Regulatory assets1,605 1,287 
Other assets686 534 
Total assets$29,405 $26,456 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
    
ASSETS
    
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$14
 $17
Accounts receivable, net684
 728
Income taxes receivable59
 17
Inventories433
 443
Regulatory assets31
 53
Prepaid Expenses73
 64
Other current assets21
 32
Total current assets1,315
 1,354
    
Property, plant and equipment, net19,203
 19,162
Regulatory assets1,030
 1,490
Other assets372
 388
    
Total assets$21,920
 $22,394


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.





201


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$1,049 $680 
Accrued interest128 121 
Accrued property, income and other taxes67 78 
Accrued employee expenses86 89 
Current portion of long-term debt449 155 
Regulatory liabilities96 118 
Other current liabilities271 219 
Total current liabilities2,146 1,460 
Long-term debt9,217 8,575 
Regulatory liabilities2,843 2,650 
Deferred income taxes3,152 2,847 
Other long-term liabilities1,306 1,011 
Total liabilities18,664 16,543 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock
Common stock - 750 shares authorized, no par value, 357 shares issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital4,479 4,479 
Retained earnings6,269 5,449 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(9)(17)
Total shareholders' equity10,741 9,913 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$29,405 $26,456 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
    
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
    
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$453
 $408
Accrued employee expenses70
 67
Accrued interest115
 115
Accrued property and other taxes66
 63
Short-term debt80
 270
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations588
 58
Regulatory liabilities75
 54
Other current liabilities170
 164
Total current liabilities1,617
 1,199
    
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations6,437
 7,021
Regulatory liabilities2,996
 978
Deferred income taxes2,582
 4,880
Other long-term liabilities733
 926
Total liabilities14,365
 15,004
    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
 
    
Shareholders' equity:   
Preferred stock2
 2
Common stock - 750 shares authorized, no par value, 357 shares issued and outstanding
 
Additional paid-in capital4,479
 4,479
Retained earnings3,089
 2,921
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(15) (12)
Total shareholders' equity7,555
 7,390
    
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$21,920
 $22,394


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



202


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $5,341 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 1,790 
Operations and maintenance1,227 1,031 1,209 
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 1,209 
Property and other taxes195 213 209 
Total operating expenses4,521 4,163 4,417 
Operating income1,158 1,133 924 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(431)(430)(426)
Allowance for borrowed funds31 24 48 
Allowance for equity funds71 50 98 
Interest and dividend income44 24 10 
Other, net(15)10 
Total other income (expense)(300)(324)(260)
Income before income tax benefit858 809 664 
Income tax benefit(62)(79)(75)
Net income$920 $888 $739 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Operating revenue$5,237
 $5,201
 $5,232
      
Operating costs and expenses:     
Energy costs1,770
 1,751
 1,868
Operations and maintenance1,012
 1,064
 1,082
Depreciation and amortization796
 770
 757
Taxes, other than income taxes197
 190
 185
Total operating costs and expenses3,775
 3,775
 3,892
      
Operating income1,462
 1,426
 1,340
      
Other income (expense):     
Interest expense(381) (380) (379)
Allowance for borrowed funds11
 15
 18
Allowance for equity funds20
 27
 33
Other, net16
 15
 11
Total other income (expense)(334) (323) (317)
      
Income before income tax expense1,128
 1,103
 1,023
Income tax expense360
 340
 328
Net income$768
 $763
 $695


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



203


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income$920 $888 $739 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax —
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $3, $1 and $(1)(3)
Comprehensive income$928 $890 $736 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net income$768
 $763
 $695
      
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax —     
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $3, $- and $1(3) (1) 2
      
Comprehensive income$765
 $762
 $697


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



204


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)

Accumulated
AdditionalOtherTotal
PreferredCommonPaid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholders'
StockStockCapitalEarningsLoss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 2019$$— $4,479 $3,972 $(16)$8,437 
Net income— — — 739 — 739 
Other comprehensive loss— — — — (3)(3)
Balance, December 31, 2020— 4,479 4,711 (19)9,173 
Net income— — — 888 — 888 
Other comprehensive income— — — — 
Common stock dividends declared— — — (150)— (150)
Balance, December 31, 2021— 4,479 5,449 (17)9,913 
Net income— — — 920 — 920 
Other comprehensive income— — — — 
Common stock dividends declared— — — (100)— (100)
Balance, December 31, 2022$$— $4,479 $6,269 $(9)$10,741 
         Accumulated  
     Additional   Other Total
 Preferred Common Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Shareholders'
 Stock Stock Capital Earnings Loss, Net Equity
Balance, December 31, 2014$2
 $
 $4,479
 $3,288
 $(13) $7,756
Net income
 
 
 695
 
 695
Other comprehensive income
 
 
 
 2
 2
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 (950) 
 (950)
Balance, December 31, 20152
 
 4,479
 3,033
 (11) 7,503
Net income
 
 
 763
 
 763
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (1) (1)
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 (875) 
 (875)
Balance, December 31, 20162
 
 4,479
 2,921
 (12) 7,390
Net income
 
 
 768
 
 768
Other comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 (3) (3)
Common stock dividends declared
 
 
 (600) 
 (600)
Balance, December 31, 2017$2
 $
 $4,479
 $3,089
 $(15) $7,555


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



205


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$920 $888 $739 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 1,209 
Allowance for equity funds(71)(50)(98)
Net power cost deferrals(482)(159)(1)
Amortization of net power cost deferrals100 67 50 
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(162)(97)(278)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits157 64 (124)
Other, net13 (5)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables, other receivables and other assets(264)17 (169)
Inventories— (88)
Derivative collateral, net95 19 23 
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net(46)(37)(53)
Accounts payable and other liabilities439 372 
Net cash flows from operating activities1,819 1,804 1,583 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(2,166)(1,513)(2,540)
Other, net12 30 
Net cash flows from investing activities(2,161)(1,501)(2,510)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt1,087 984 987 
Repayments of long-term debt(155)(870)(38)
(Repayments of) net proceeds from short-term debt— (93)(37)
Dividends paid(100)(150)— 
Other, net(2)(7)(2)
Net cash flows from financing activities830 (136)910 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents488 167 (17)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period186 19 36 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$674 $186 $19 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$768
 $763
 $695
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating     
activities:
 
 
Depreciation and amortization796
 770
 757
Allowance for equity funds(20) (27) (33)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits70
 139
 172
Changes in regulatory assets and liabilities18
 122
 63
Other, net9
 4
 6
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable and other assets48
 (20) 6
Derivative collateral, net(6) 6
 (47)
Inventories10
 (21) (7)
Prepaid expenses(8) (5) (1)
Income taxes(49) 
 116
Accounts payable and other liabilities(61) (163) 7
Net cash flows from operating activities1,575
 1,568
 1,734
      
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Capital expenditures(769) (903) (916)
Other, net40
 34
 (2)
Net cash flows from investing activities(729) (869) (918)
      
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from long-term debt
 
 248
Repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations(58) (68) (124)
Net (repayments) proceeds from short-term debt(190) 250
 
Common stock dividends(600) (875) (950)
Other, net(1) (1) (1)
Net cash flows from financing activities(849) (694) (827)
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(3) 5
 (11)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period17
 12
 23
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$14
 $17
 $12


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



206


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(1)Organization and Operations


PacifiCorp, which includes PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries, is a United StatesU.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial, industrial, irrigation and other customers in portions of Utah, Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, Idaho and California. PacifiCorp owns, or has interests in, a number of thermal, hydroelectric, wind-powered and geothermal generating facilities, as well as electric transmission and distribution assets. PacifiCorp also buys and sells electricity on the wholesale market with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. PacifiCorp is subject to comprehensive state and federal regulation. PacifiCorp's subsidiaries support its electric utility operations by providing coal mining services. PacifiCorp is an indirect subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"), a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").


(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Consolidation and Presentation


The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.


Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements


The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies.loss contingencies and applicable insurance recoveries, including those related to the Oregon and Northern California 2020 wildfires (the "2020 Wildfires") and the 2022 McKinney fire described in Note 14. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


PacifiCorp prepares its financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, PacifiCorp defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in rates occur.


PacifiCorp continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit PacifiCorp's ability to recover its costs. PacifiCorp believes the application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written offrecognized in net income, returned to net incomecustomers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").


Fair Value Measurements


As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered inwhen determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.


207


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and InvestmentsCash Equivalents


Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, United StatesU.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted amounts are includedcash and cash equivalents consist substantially of funds representing vendor retention, custodial and nuclear decommissioning funds. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 as presented in other current assetsthe Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and other assetsdisaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets (in millions):

As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$641 $179 
Restricted cash included in other current assets
Restricted cash included in other assets26 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$674 $186 

Investments


Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with realized gains and losses, as determined on a specific identification basis, recognized in earnings and unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI, net of tax. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, PacifiCorp had no unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities. Trading securities are carried at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings.


Equity Method Investments

PacifiCorp utilizes the equity method of accounting with respect to investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when an investor possesses more than 20% of the voting interests of the investee. This presumption may be overcome based on specific facts and circumstances that demonstrate that the ability to exercise significant influence is restricted. In applying the equity method, PacifiCorp records the investment at cost and subsequently increases or decreases the carrying value of the investment by PacifiCorp's proportionate share of the net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI") of the investee. PacifiCorp records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment.


Allowance for Doubtful AccountsCredit Losses


Accounts receivableTrade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination, and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts.credit losses. The allowance for doubtful accountscredit losses is based on PacifiCorp's assessment of the collectibilitycollectability of amounts owed to PacifiCorp by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, PacifiCorp primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, PacifiCorp may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. The change in the balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts,credit losses, which is included in accounts receivable,trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$18 $17 $
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net18 13 18 
Write-offs, net(17)(12)(9)
Ending balance$19 $18 $17 

208

 2017 2016 2015
      
Beginning balance$7
 $7
 $7
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net15
 12
 10
Write-offs, net(12) (12) (10)
Ending balance$10
 $7
 $7


Derivatives


PacifiCorp employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage price risk for electricity, natural gas and other commodities and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.


Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked-to-market and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of fuel and energy costs on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


For PacifiCorp's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in rates are recorded as regulatory liabilities or assets. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.



Inventories


Inventories consist mainly of materials, and supplies totaling $235 million and $228 million as of December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and fuel stocks totaling $198 million and $215 million as of December 31, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Inventories are stated at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.


Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


General


Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. PacifiCorp capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs, which include debt and equity allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"). The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed.


Depreciation and amortization are generally computed on the straight-line method based on composite asset class lives prescribed by PacifiCorp's various regulatory authorities or over the assets' estimated useful lives. Depreciation studies are completed periodically to determine the appropriate composite asset class lives, net salvage and depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the various regulatory authorities. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.


Generally when PacifiCorp retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings.


Debt and equity AFUDC, which representrepresents the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of property, plant and equipment, is capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, PacifiCorp is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.


209


Asset Retirement Obligations


PacifiCorp recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. PacifiCorp's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.


Impairment


The CompanyPacifiCorp evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. TheSubstantially all property, plant and equipment supports PacifiCorp's regulated operations, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.



Leases

PacifiCorp has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for land, office space, office equipment, and generating facilities and finance leases consisting primarily of office buildings, natural gas pipeline facilities, and generating facilities. These leases generally require PacifiCorp to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. PacifiCorp does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating PacifiCorp is reasonably certain to exercise the option. PacifiCorp's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Right-of-use assets will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

PacifiCorp's leases of generating facilities generally are in the form of long-term purchases of electricity, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

PacifiCorp's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition


Revenue is recognized as electricity is deliveredPacifiCorp uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services are provided. Revenue recognized includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, unbilled revenue was $255 million and $275 million, respectively, and is included in accounts receivable, net onan amount that reflects the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Rates charged are established by regulatorsconsideration to which PacifiCorp expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or contractual arrangements.

The determination of sales to individual customers is based on the reading of the customer's meter, which is performed on a systematic basis throughout the month. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. The estimate is reversed in the following month and actual revenue is recorded based on subsequent meter readings.

The monthly unbilled revenues of PacifiCorp are determined by the estimation of unbilled energy provided during the period, the assignment of unbilled energy provided to customer classes and the average rate per customer class. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes.

services. PacifiCorp records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Substantially all of PacifiCorp's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission and distribution and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging."
210


Revenue recognized is equal to what PacifiCorp has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of PacifiCorp's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $301 million and $264 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued.

Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Debt Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes


Berkshire Hathaway includes PacifiCorp in its consolidated United StatesU.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, PacifiCorp's provision for income taxes has been computed on a stand-alone basis.


Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using estimatedenacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with components of OCI are charged or credited directly to OCI. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("2017 Tax Reform") was signed into law which, among other items, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with income tax benefits and expense for the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that PacifiCorp deems probable to be passed on to its customers in most state jurisdictions are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.reverse or as otherwise approved by PacifiCorp's various regulatory commissions. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.


Investment tax credits are generally deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties or as prescribed by various regulatory jurisdictions. Investment tax credits are included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and were $16 million and $18 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.commissions.


In determining PacifiCorp's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by PacifiCorp's various regulatory jurisdictions. PacifiCorp's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. PacifiCorp recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of PacifiCorp's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, PacifiCorp believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations, if any, is not expected to have a material impact on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results. PacifiCorp's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Segment Information


PacifiCorp currently has one segment, which includes its regulated electric utility operations.


New Accounting Pronouncements
211



In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-07, which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 715, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits." The amendments in this guidance require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statement of operations separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of operating income. Additionally, the guidance only allows the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. This guidance must be adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of operations and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component in the balance sheet. PacifiCorp adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, which amends FASB ASC Subtopic 230-10, "Statement of Cash Flows - Overall." The amendments in this guidance require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. PacifiCorp adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, which amends FASB ASC Topic 230, "Statement of Cash Flows." The amendments in this guidance address the classification of eight specific cash flow issues within the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. PacifiCorp adopted this guidance January 1, 2018 and the adoption of this guidance will not have a material impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, which creates FASB ASC Topic 842, "Leases" and supersedes Topic 840 "Leases." This guidance increases transparency and comparability among entities by recording lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. A lessee should recognize in the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. PacifiCorp plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2019 and is currently evaluating the impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, which amends FASB ASC Subtopic 825-10, "Financial Instruments - Overall." The amendments in this guidance address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments including a requirement that all investments in equity securities that do not qualify for equity method accounting or result in consolidation of the investee be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption not permitted, and is required to be adopted prospectively by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. PacifiCorp adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which creates FASB ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and supersedes ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition." The guidance replaces industry-specific guidance and establishes a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, the guidance requires the entity to disclose further quantitative and qualitative information regarding the nature and amount of revenues arising from contracts with customers, as well as other information about the significant judgments and estimates used in recognizing revenues from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 one year to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued several ASUs that clarify the implementation guidance for ASU No. 2014-09 but do not change the core principle of the guidance. This guidance may be adopted retrospectively or under a modified retrospective method where the cumulative effect is recognized at the date of initial application. PacifiCorp adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method and the adoption will not have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements but will increase the disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The timing and amount of revenue recognized after adoption of the new guidance will not be different than before as a majority of revenue is recognized when PacifiCorp has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of PacifiCorp's performance to date. PacifiCorp plans to quantitatively disaggregate revenue in the required financial statement footnote by customer class.

(3)Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):

Depreciable Life20222021
Utility Plant:
Generation15 - 59 years$13,726 $13,679 
Transmission60 - 90 years8,051 7,894 
Distribution20 - 75 years8,477 8,044 
Intangible plant(1) and other
5 - 75 years2,755 2,645 
Utility plant in-service33,009 32,262 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(11,093)(10,507)
Utility plant in-service, net21,916 21,755 
Nonregulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization14 - 95 years18 18 
21,934 21,773 
Construction work-in-progress2,496 1,141 
Property, plant and equipment, net$24,430 $22,914 

 Depreciable Life 2017 2016
Utility Plant:     
Generation14 - 67 years $12,490
 $12,371
Transmission58 - 75 years 6,226
 6,055
Distribution20 - 70 years 6,792
 6,590
Intangible plant(1)
5 - 62 years 937
 884
Other5 - 60 years 1,435
 1,384
Utility plant in service  27,880
 27,284
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (9,366) (8,790)
Utility plant in service, net  18,514
 18,494
Other non-regulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization45 years 11
 11
Plant, net  18,525
 18,505
Construction work-in-progress  678
 657
Property, plant and equipment, net  $19,203
 $19,162
(1)Computer software costs included in intangible plant are initially assigned a depreciable life of 5 to 10 years.

(1)Computer software costs included in intangible plant are initially assigned a depreciable life of 5 to 10 years.


The average depreciation and amortization rate applied to depreciable property, plant and equipment was 2.9%3.5%, 3.5% and 4.1% for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


Unallocated Acquisition Adjustments


PacifiCorp has unallocated acquisition adjustments that represent the excess of costs of the acquired interests in property, plant and equipment purchased from the entity that first devoteddedicated the assets to utility service over their net book value in those assets. These unallocated acquisition adjustments included in other property, plant and equipment had an original cost of $156 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively,2021, and accumulated depreciation of $122$144 million and $117$143 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.



(4)Jointly Owned Utility Facilities


Under joint facility ownership agreements with other utilities, PacifiCorp, as a tenant in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation, transmission and distribution facilities. PacifiCorp accounts for its proportionate share of each facility, and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include PacifiCorp's share of the expenses of these facilities.


212


The amounts shown in the table below represent PacifiCorp's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 20172022 (dollars in millions):
FacilityAccumulatedConstruction
PacifiCorpinDepreciation andWork-in-
ShareServiceAmortizationProgress
Jim Bridger Nos. 1 - 467 %$1,529 $914 $39 
Hunter No. 194 517 227 
Hunter No. 260 305 148 
Wyodak80 491 273 
Colstrip Nos. 3 and 410 262 178 — 
Hermiston50 189 106 — 
Craig Nos. 1 and 219 372 331 — 
Hayden No. 125 77 52 — 
Hayden No. 213 44 31 — 
Transmission and distribution facilitiesVarious916 274 129 
Total$4,702 $2,534 $178 

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$11 $11 
Finance leases11 
Total right-of-use assets$20 $22 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$11 $11 
Finance leases11 12 
Total lease liabilities$22 $23 

213


   Facility Accumulated Construction
 PacifiCorp in Depreciation and Work-in-
 Share Service Amortization Progress
        
Jim Bridger Nos. 1 - 467% $1,442
 $616
 $12
Hunter No. 194
 474
 172
 7
Hunter No. 260
 297
 106
 1
Wyodak80
 469
 216
 1
Colstrip Nos. 3 and 410
 247
 131
 4
Hermiston50
 180
 81
 1
Craig Nos. 1 and 219
 365
 231
 3
Hayden No. 125
 74
 34
 
Hayden No. 213
 43
 21
 
Foote Creek79
 40
 26
 
Transmission and distribution facilitiesVarious 794
 238
 67
Total  $4,425
 $1,872
 $96
The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):


202220212020
Variable$61 $56 $60 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization
Interest
Short-term
Total lease costs$71 $69 $68 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases11.412.713.9
Finance leases9.710.18.4
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases3.9 %3.7 %3.8 %
Finance leases11.4 %11.1 %10.5 %
(5)
Cash payments associated with operating and finance lease liabilities approximated lease cost for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

PacifiCorp has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$$
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter13 
Total undiscounted lease payments14 18 32 
Less - amounts representing interest(3)(7)(10)
Lease liabilities$11 $11 $22 

214


(6)Regulatory Matters


Regulatory Assets


Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. PacifiCorp's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life20222021
Employee benefit plans(1)
16 years$290 $286 
Utah mine disposition(2)
Various115 116 
Unamortized contract values1 year18 36 
Deferred net power costs2 years546 151 
Environmental costs30 years111 108 
Asset retirement obligation29 years275 241 
Demand side management (DSM)10 years224 211 
Wildfire mitigation and vegetation management costsVarious111 21 
OtherVarious190 182 
Total regulatory assets$1,880 $1,352 
Reflected as:
Current assets$275 $65 
Noncurrent assets1,605 1,287 
Total regulatory assets$1,880 $1,352 
 Weighted    
 Average    
 Remaining    
 Life 2017 2016
      
Deferred income taxes(1)
N/A $
 $421
Employee benefit plans(2)
20 years 418
 525
Utah mine disposition(3)
Various 156
 166
Unamortized contract values6 years 89
 98
Deferred net power costs1 year 21
 33
Unrealized loss on derivative contracts4 years 101
 73
Asset retirement obligation22 years 100
 82
OtherVarious 176
 145
Total regulatory assets  $1,061
 $1,543
      
Reflected as:     
Current assets  $31
 $53
Noncurrent assets  1,030
 1,490
Total regulatory assets  $1,061
 $1,543


(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in rates when recognized.
(1)Amount primarily represents income tax benefits and expense related to certain property-related basis differences and other various items that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

(2)Amounts represent regulatory assets established as a result of the Utah mine disposition in 2015 for the United Mine Workers of America ("UMWA") 1974 Pension Plan withdrawal and closure costs incurred to date considered probable of recovery.
(2)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in rates when recognized.

(3)Amounts represent regulatory assets established as a result of the Utah mine disposition in 2015 for the net property, plant and equipment not considered probable of disallowance and for the portion of losses associated with the assets held for sale, UMWA 1974 Pension Plan withdrawal and closure costs incurred to date considered probable of recovery.


PacifiCorp had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $589$1,200 million and $1.019 billion$723 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.



215


Regulatory Liabilities


Regulatory liabilities represent income to be recognized or amounts to be returned to customers in future periods. PacifiCorp's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life20222021
Cost of removal(1)
26 years$1,332 $1,187 
Deferred income taxes(2)
Various1,164 1,307 
Unrealized gain on regulated derivatives1 year270 53 
OtherVarious173 221 
Total regulatory liabilities$2,939 $2,768 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$96 $118 
Noncurrent liabilities2,843 2,650 
Total regulatory liabilities$2,939 $2,768 
 Weighted    
 Average    
 Remaining    
 Life 2017 2016
      
Cost of removal(1)
26 years $955
 $917
Deferred income taxes(2)
Various 1,960
 9
OtherVarious 156
 106
Total regulatory liabilities  $3,071
 $1,032
      
Reflected as:     
Current liabilities  $75
 $54
Noncurrent liabilities  2,996
 978
Total regulatory liabilities  $3,071
 $1,032


(1)Amounts represent estimated costs, as generally accrued through depreciation rates, of removing property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.
(1)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.

(2)(2)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. See Note 8 for further discussion of 2017 Tax Reform.

Utah Mine Disposition

In December 2014, PacifiCorp filed an advice letter with the California Public Utility Commission ("CPUC") to request approval to sell certain Utah mining assets and to establish memorandum accounts to track the costs associated with the Utah Mine Disposition for future recovery. In July 2015, the CPUC Energy Division issued a letter requiring PacifiCorp to file a formal application for approval of the sale of certain Utah mining assets. Accordingly, in September 2015, PacifiCorp filed an application with the CPUC. On February 6, 2017, a joint motion was filed with the CPUC seeking approval of a settlement agreement reached by PacifiCorp and all other parties. The agreement states, among other things, that the decision to sell certain Utah mining assets is in the public interest. Parties also reserve their rights to additional testimony, briefs, and hearings to the extentfederal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable of being passed on to customers, partially offset by income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the CPUC determines that additional California Environmental Quality Act proceedings are necessary. A CPUC decision on the joint motion and settlement agreement is expected in 2018.temporary differences reverse.



(6)
(7)Short-term Debt and Other Financing AgreementsCredit Facilities


The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's availability under its unsecured credit facilitiesfacility as of December 31 (in millions):

2022:
Credit facility$1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(249)
Net credit facility$951 
2021:
Credit facility$1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support(218)
Net credit facility$982 

2017:  
Credit facilities $1,000
Less:  
Short-term debt (80)
Tax-exempt bond support (130)
Net credit facilities $790
   
2016:  
Credit facilities $1,000
Less:  
Short-term debt (270)
Tax-exempt bond support (142)
Net credit facilities $588
As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp was in compliance with the covenants of its credit facility and letter of credit arrangements.


PacifiCorp has a $600 million$1.2 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 20202025 with two one-yearan unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent and a $400 million unsecuredconsent. The credit facility, expiring in June 2020 with a one-year extension option subject to lender consent. These credit facilities, which supportsupports PacifiCorp's commercial paper program and certain series of its tax-exempt bond obligations and provideprovides for the issuance of letters of credit, havehas a variable interest ratesrate based on the Eurodollar rateSecured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at PacifiCorp's option, plus a spread that varies based on PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities.

As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, the weighted average interest rate on2021, PacifiCorp did not have any commercial paper borrowings outstanding was 1.83% and 0.96%, respectively. Theseoutstanding.

216


The credit facilities requirefacility requires that PacifiCorp's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.


In January 2023, PacifiCorp entered into an additional $800 million 364-day unsecured credit facility expiring in January 2024. No amounts are currently outstanding against this new credit facility.

As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, PacifiCorp had $230$38 million and $269$19 million, respectively, of fully available letters of credit issued under committed arrangements. Asarrangements outside of December 31, 2017 and 2016, $216 million and $255 million, respectively,its credit facility in support of these letters of credit, support PacifiCorp's variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations and expire through March 2019 and $14 million support certain transactions required by third parties andthat generally have provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration dates for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of credit prior to the expiration date.



(7)
(8)Long-term Debt and Capital Lease Obligations


PacifiCorp's long-term debt and capital lease obligations werewas as follows as of December 31 (dollars in millions):

20222021
AverageAverage
PrincipalCarryingInterestCarryingInterest
AmountValueRateValueRate
First mortgage bonds:
2.95% to 8.23%, due through 2026$1,224 $1,223 4.07 %$1,377 4.41 %
2.70% to 7.70%, due 2029 to 20311,100 1,095 4.35 1,094 4.35 
5.25% to 6.25%, due 2034 to 20372,050 2,042 5.90 2,042 5.90 
4.10% to 6.35%, due 2038 to 20421,250 1,239 5.63 1,238 5.63 
2.90% to 5.35%, due 2049 to 20533,900 3,849 4.03 2,761 3.52 
Variable-rate series, tax-exempt bond obligations (2022-3.75% to 4.10%; 2021-0.12% to 0.14%):
Due 202525 25 4.10 25 0.12 
Due 2024 to 2025(1)
193 193 3.81 193 0.13 
Total long-term debt$9,742 $9,666 $8,730 
Reflected as:
20222021
Current portion of long-term debt$449 $155 
Long-term debt9,217 8,575 
Total long-term debt$9,666 $8,730 
 2017 2016
     Average   Average
 Principal Carrying Interest Carrying Interest
 Amount Value Rate Value Rate
          
First mortgage bonds:         
2.95% to 8.53%, due 2018 to 2022$1,875
 $1,872
 4.80% $1,872
 4.80%
2.95% to 8.23%, due 2023 to 20261,224
 1,218
 4.10
 1,217
 4.10
7.70% due 2031300
 298
 7.70
 298
 7.70
5.25% to 6.25%, due 2034 to 20372,050
 2,040
 5.90
 2,039
 5.90
4.10% to 6.35%, due 2038 to 20421,250
 1,236
 5.60
 1,235
 5.60
Variable-rate series, tax-exempt bond obligations (2017-1.60% to 1.87%; 2016-0.69% to 0.86%):         
Due 2018 to 202079
 79
 1.77
 91
 0.85
Due 2018 to 2025(1)
70
 70
 1.81
 108
 0.74
Due 2024(1)(2)
143
 142
 1.73
 142
 0.70
Due 2024 to 2025(2)
50
 50
 1.72
 50
 0.80
Total long-term debt7,041
 7,005
   7,052
  
Capital lease obligations:         
8.75% to 14.61%, due through 203520
 20
 11.46
 27
 11.09
Total long-term debt and capital lease         
obligations$7,061
 $7,025
   $7,079
  

(1)Secured by pledged first mortgage bonds registered to and held by the tax-exempt bond trustee generally with the same interest rates, maturity dates and redemption provisions as the tax-exempt bond obligations.
Reflected as:   
 2017 2016
    
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations$588
 $58
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations6,437
 7,021
Total long-term debt and capital lease obligations$7,025
 $7,079


In December 2022, PacifiCorp issued $1.1 billion of its 5.35% First Mortgage Bonds due December 2053. PacifiCorp intends within 24 months of the issuance date to allocate an amount equal to the net proceeds to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, new or existing investments or expenditures made in one or more eligible projects in alignment with BHE's Green Financing Framework. Proceeds will not knowingly be allocated to the same portion of a project that received allocation of proceeds under any other Green Financing Instrument; activities related to the exploration, production, transportation, or consumption of fossil fuels; or activities related to nuclear energy.
1)Supported by $216 million and $255 million of fully available letters of credit issued under committed bank arrangements as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
2)Secured by pledged first mortgage bonds registered to and held by the tax-exempt bond trustee generally with the same interest rates, maturity dates and redemption provisions as the tax-exempt bond obligations.

PacifiCorp's long-term debt generally includes provisions that allow PacifiCorp to redeem the first mortgage bonds in whole or in part at any time through the payment of a make-whole premium. Variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations are generally redeemable at par value.


217


PacifiCorp currently has regulatory authority from the OPUCOregon Public Utility Commission and the IPUCIdaho Public Utilities Commission to issue an additional $1.325 billion$900 million of long-term debt. PacifiCorp must make a notice filing with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission prior to any future issuance. PacifiCorp currently has an effective shelf registration statement filed with the United StatesU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to issue up to $1.325 billion additionalan indeterminate amount of first mortgage bonds through January 2019.September 2023.


The issuance of PacifiCorp's first mortgage bonds is limited by available property, earnings tests and other provisions of PacifiCorp's mortgage. Approximately $27$33 billion of PacifiCorp's eligible property (based on original cost) was subject to the lien of the mortgage as of December 31, 2017.2022.


PacifiCorp has entered into long-term agreements that qualify as capital leases and expire at various dates through March 2035 for transportation services, a power purchase agreement and real estate. The transportation services agreements included as capital leases are for the right to use pipeline facilities to provide natural gas to two of PacifiCorp's generating facilities. Net capital lease assets of $20 million and $27 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, were included in property, plant and equipment, net in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, the annual principal maturities of long-term debt and total capital lease obligations for 20182023 and thereafter are as follows (in millions):

Long-term
Debt
2023$449 
2024591 
2025302 
2026100 
2027— 
Thereafter8,300 
Total9,742 
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs(76)
Total$9,666 

 Long-term Capital Lease  
 Debt Obligations Total
      
2018$586
 $4
 $590
2019350
 4
 354
202038
 3
 41
2021420
 6
 426
2022605
 2
 607
Thereafter5,042
 18
 5,060
Total7,041
 37
 7,078
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs(36) 
 (36)
Amounts representing interest


 (17) (17)
Total$7,005
 $20
 $7,025

(8)(9)Income Taxes

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

The 2017 Tax Reform impacts many areas of income tax law. The most material items include the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and limitations on bonus depreciation for utility property. GAAP requires the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates be recognized in the period the tax rate change was enacted. As a result of the 2017 Tax Reform, PacifiCorp reduced deferred income tax liabilities $2,361 million. As it is probable the change in deferred taxes will be passed back to customers through regulatory mechanisms, PacifiCorp increased net regulatory liabilities by $2,358 million.

In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 to assist in the implementation process of the 2017 Tax Reform by allowing for calculations to be classified as provisional and subject to remeasurement. There are three different classifications for the accounting: (1) completed, (2) not complete but reasonably estimable or (3) not complete and amounts are not reasonably estimable. PacifiCorp has recorded the impacts of the 2017 Tax Reform and believes all the impacts to be complete with the exception of interpretations of the bonus depreciation rules. PacifiCorp has determined the amounts recorded and the interpretations relating to this item to be provisional and subject to remeasurement during the measurement period upon obtaining the necessary additional information to complete the accounting. PacifiCorp believes its interpretations for bonus depreciation to be reasonable, however, as the guidance is clarified estimates may change. The accounting is estimated to be completed by December 2018.




Income tax (benefit) expense (benefit) consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
2022 20212020
Current:
Federal$(216)$(150)$19 
State(3)30 
Total(219)(143)49 
Deferred:
Federal90 26 (124)
State71 40 
Total161 66 (123)
Investment tax credits(4)(2)(1)
Total income tax (benefit) expense$(62)$(79)$(75)

218

 2017 2016 2015
      
Current:     
Federal$249
 $169
 $130
State41
 32
 26
Total290
 201
 156
      
Deferred:     
Federal59
 123
 148
State15
 21
 29
Total74
 144
 177
      
Investment tax credits(4) (5) (5)
Total income tax expense$360
 $340
 $328


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
Effects of ratemaking(12)(14)(22)
Federal income tax credits(22)(20)(13)
Valuation allowance— — 
Other— — 
Effective income tax rate(7)%(10)%(11)%
 2017 2016 2015
      
Federal statutory income tax rate35 % 35 % 35 %
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit3
 3
 3
Federal income tax credits(5) (6) (6)
Other(1) (1) 
Effective income tax rate32 % 31 % 32 %


Income tax credits relate primarily to production tax credits ("PTC") earned by PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities. Federal renewable electricity production tax creditsPTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-powered generating facilities is produced and sold and are based on a per-kilowatt hour rate pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law. Wind-powered generating facilities are eligible for the credits for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in-service. PTCs for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 totaled $185 million, $164 million and $89 million, respectively.


Effects of ratemaking is primarily attributable to activity associated with excess deferred income taxes. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $102 million for 2022. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $112 million for 2021, including the use of $4 million to amortize certain regulatory balances in Wyoming and Idaho. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $132 million for 2020, including the use of $118 million to accelerate depreciation of certain retired equipment and to amortize certain regulatory balances in Idaho, Oregon and Utah.

The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Deferred income tax assets:
Regulatory liabilities$724 $682 
Employee benefits59 68 
State carryforwards73 73 
Loss contingencies107 63 
Asset retirement obligations79 73 
Other80 88 
  Total deferred income tax assets1,122 1,047 
Valuation allowances(35)(15)
Total deferred income tax assets, net1,087 1,032 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment(3,612)(3,468)
Regulatory assets(462)(332)
Other(165)(79)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(4,239)(3,879)
Net deferred income tax liability$(3,152)$(2,847)

219

 2017 2016
    
Deferred income tax assets:   
Regulatory liabilities$756
 $393
Employee benefits84
 202
Derivative contracts and unamortized contract values48
 67
State carryforwards83
 69
Asset retirement obligations50
 78
Other50
 94
 1,071
 903
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Property, plant and equipment(3,381) (5,161)
Regulatory assets(261) (586)
Other(11) (36)
 (3,653) (5,783)
Net deferred income tax liability$(2,582) $(4,880)




The following table provides, without regard to valuation allowances, PacifiCorp's net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and expiration dates as of December 31, 20172022 (in millions):
State
Net operating loss carryforwards$1,159 
Deferred income taxes on net operating loss carryforwards$53 
Expiration dates2023 - indefinite
Tax credit carryforwards$20 
Expiration dates2023 - indefinite
  State
   
Net operating loss carryforwards $1,356
Deferred income taxes on net operating loss carryforwards $63
Expiration dates 2018 - 2032
   
Tax credit carryforwards $20
Expiration dates 2018 - indefinite


The United StatesU.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of PacifiCorp's income tax returns through December 31, 2009.2013. The statute of limitations for PacifiCorp's state income tax returns have expired for certain states through December 31, 2009, with2011, and for Idaho through December 31, 2018, except for the exceptionimpact of California and Utah, for whichany federal audit adjustments. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, have expired through March 31, 2006. The statute of limitations expiring for state filings may not preclude the state from adjusting the state net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the examinationstatute of limitations is not closed.

As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, PacifiCorp had unrecognized tax benefits totaling $10 million and $12 million, respectively, related to tax positions for which ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty as to the timing of such deductibility. Recognition of these tax benefits, other than applicable interest and penalties, would not affect PacifiCorp's effective income tax rate.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans
(9)
Employee Benefit Plans


PacifiCorp sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans that cover the majoritycertain of its employees, as well as a defined contribution 401(k) employee savings plan ("401(k) Plan"). In addition, PacifiCorp contributes to a joint trustee pension plan and a subsidiary previously contributed to a multiemployer pension plan for benefits offered to certain bargaining units.


Pension and Other PostretirementDefined Benefit Plans


PacifiCorp's pension plans include non-contributory defined benefit pension plans, collectively the PacifiCorp Retirement Plan ("Retirement Plan"), and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP"). The Retirement Plan is closed to all non-union employees hired after January 1, 2008. All non-union Retirement Plan participants hired prior to January 1, 2008 that did not elect to receive equivalent fixed contributions to the 401(k) Plan effective January 1, 2009 earned benefits based on a cash balance formula through December 31, 2016. Effective January 1, 2017, non-union employee participants with a cash balance benefit in the Retirement Plan are no longer eligible to receive pay credits in their cash balance formula. In general for union employees, benefits under the Retirement Plan were frozen at various dates from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2011 as they are now being provided with enhanced 401(k) Plan benefits. However, certain limited union Retirement Plan participants continue to earn benefits under the Retirement Plan based on the employee's years of service and a final average pay formula. The SERP was closed to new participants as of March 21, 2006 and froze future accruals for active participants as of December 31, 2014.


PacifiCorp's other postretirement benefit plan provides healthcare and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees.



Pension Settlement

Pension settlement accounting was triggered in 2022 and 2021 as a result of the amount of lump sum distributions in the Retirement Plan exceeding the service and interest cost threshold. The 2021 pension settlement accounting included an interim July 31, 2021 remeasurement of the pension plan assets and projected benefit obligation. As a result of the settlement accounting, PacifiCorp recognized settlement losses of $6 million, net of regulatory deferrals during each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Net Periodic Benefit Cost


For purposes of calculating the expected return on plan assets, a market-related value is used. The market-related value of plan assets is calculated by spreading the difference between expected and actual investment returns over a five-year period beginning after the first year in which they occur.


220


Net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the plans included the following components for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Service cost$— $— $— $$$
Interest cost29 29 36 
Expected return on plan assets(42)(51)(56)(11)(9)(14)
Settlement(1)
— — — — 
Net amortization16 21 18 
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)$$$(2)$— $$— 

 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
            
Service cost$
 $4
 $4
 $2
 $2
 $3
Interest cost49
 54
 53
 14
 15
 16
Expected return on plan assets(72) (75) (77) (21) (21) (23)
Net amortization14
 34
 42
 (6) (5) (4)
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)$(9) $17
 $22
 $(11) $(9) $(8)
(1)Pension amounts represent settlement losses of $24 million and $15 million net of deferrals of $18 million and $9 million during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.



Funded Status


The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$1,058 $1,064 $324 $327 
Employer contributions(1)
— 
Participant contributions— — 
Actual (loss) return on plan assets(172)109 (42)14 
Settlement(2)
(67)(52)— — 
Benefits paid(65)(68)(23)(24)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$758 $1,058 $264 $324 
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$999
 $1,043
 $302
 $305
Employer contributions54
 5
 1
 1
Participant contributions
 
 7
 6
Actual return on plan assets166
 51
 49
 17
Benefits paid(108) (100) (27) (27)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$1,111
 $999
 $332
 $302


(1)Pension amounts represent employer contributions to the SERP.
(2)Benefits paid in the form of lump sum distributions that gave rise to the settlement accounting described above.

The following table is a reconciliation of the benefit obligations for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$1,048 $1,202 $288 $307 
Service cost— — 
Interest cost29 29 
Participant contributions— — 
Actuarial gain(199)(63)(61)(10)
Settlement(1)
(67)(52)— — 
Benefits paid(65)(68)(23)(24)
Benefit obligation, end of year$746 $1,048 $219 $288 
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$746 $1,048 

(1)Benefits paid in the form of lump sum distributions that gave rise to the settlement accounting described above.

221

 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$1,276
 $1,289
 $358
 $362
Service cost
 4
 2
 2
Interest cost49
 54
 14
 15
Participant contributions
 
 7
 6
Actuarial (gain) loss34
 29
 (23) 
Benefits paid(108) (100) (27) (27)
Benefit obligation, end of year$1,251
 $1,276
 $331
 $358
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$1,251
 $1,276
    



The funded status of the plans and the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$758 $1,058 $264 $324 
Less - Benefit obligation, end of year746 1,048 219 288 
Funded status$12 $10 $45 $36 
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Other assets$53 $63 $45 $36 
Accrued employee expenses(4)(4)— — 
Other long-term liabilities(37)(49)— — 
Amounts recognized$12 $10 $45 $36 
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$1,111
 $999
 $332
 $302
Less - Benefit obligation, end of year1,251
 1,276
 331
 358
Funded status$(140) $(277) $1
 $(56)
        
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:       
Other assets$5
 $
 $1
 $
Other current liabilities(4) (5) 
 
Other long-term liabilities(141) (272) 
 (56)
Amounts recognized$(140) $(277) $1
 $(56)


The SERP has no plan assets; however, PacifiCorp has a Rabbi trust that holds corporate-owned life insurance and other investments to provide funding for the future cash requirements of the SERP. The cash surrender value of all of the policies included in the Rabbi trust, net of amounts borrowed against the cash surrender value, plus the fair market value of other Rabbi trust investments, was $60$61 million and $55$69 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. These assets are not included in the plan assets in the above table, but are reflected in cash and cash equivalents, totaling $9 million and $- millionnoncurrent other assets as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively, and noncurrent other assets, totaling $51 million and 55 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2021, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The projected and accumulated benefit obligations for the SERP were $42 million and $54 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.


As of December 31, 2022, the fair value of the plan assets for the Retirement Plan was in excess of both the projected benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation.

Unrecognized Amounts


The portion of the funded status of the plans not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost as of December 31 is as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Net loss (gain)$273 $298 $(36)$(28)
Regulatory deferrals(1)
29 11 
Total$302 $309 $(35)$(26)

(1)Pension amounts represent the unamortized portion of deferred settlement losses.

222

 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Net loss (gain)$442
 $518
 $(12) $39
Prior service credit
 
 (6) (13)
Regulatory deferrals(4) (7) 7
 8
Total$438
 $511
 $(11) $34


A reconciliation of the amounts not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 is as follows (in millions):
Accumulated
Other
RegulatoryComprehensive
AssetLossTotal
Pension
Balance, December 31, 2020$432 $25 $457 
Net gain arising during the year(120)(1)(121)
Net amortization(20)(1)(21)
Settlement(6)— (6)
Total(146)(2)(148)
Balance, December 31, 2021286 23 309 
Net loss (gain) arising during the year24 (9)15 
Net amortization(14)(2)(16)
Settlement(6)— (6)
Total(11)(7)
Balance, December 31, 2022$290 $12 $302 
   Accumulated  
   Other  
 Regulatory Comprehensive  
 Asset Loss Total
Pension     
Balance, December 31, 2015$473
 $19
 $492
Net loss arising during the year51
 2
 53
Net amortization(33) (1) (34)
Total18
 1
 19
Balance, December 31, 2016491
 20
 511
Net (gain) loss arising during the year(60) 1
 (59)
Net amortization(13) (1) (14)
Total(73) 
 (73)
Balance, December 31, 2017$418
 $20
 $438


Regulatory
Liability
Other Postretirement
Balance, December 31, 2020$(10)
Net gain arising during the year(15)
Net amortization(1)
Total(16)
Balance, December 31, 2021(26)
Net gain arising during the year(8)
Net amortization(1)
Total(9)
Balance, December 31, 2022$(35)

223
 Regulatory
 Asset (Liability)
Other Postretirement 
Balance, December 31, 2015$26
Net loss arising during the year3
Net amortization5
Total8
Balance, December 31, 201634
Net gain arising during the year(51)
Net amortization6
Total(45)
Balance, December 31, 2017$(11)

The net loss, prior service credit and regulatory deferrals that will be amortized in 2018 into net periodic benefit cost are estimated to be as follows (in millions):


  Net Prior Service Regulatory  
  Loss Credit Deferrals Total
         
Pension $16
 $
 $(2) $14
Other postretirement 
 (6) 1
 (5)
Total $16
 $(6) $(1) $9

Plan Assumptions


Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Benefit obligations as of December 31:
Discount rate5.55 %2.90 %2.50 %5.50 %2.90 %2.50 %
Rate of compensation increaseN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan - non-union
2020N/AN/A2.27 %N/AN/AN/A
2021N/A0.82 %0.82 %N/AN/AN/A
20220.88 %0.88 %0.82 %N/AN/AN/A
20234.73 %0.88 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
20244.73 %1.90 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
2025 and beyond2.60 %1.90 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan - union
2020N/AN/A2.16 %N/AN/AN/A
2021N/A1.42 %1.42 %N/AN/AN/A
20221.94 %1.94 %1.42 %N/AN/AN/A
20233.55 %1.94 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
20243.55 %2.30 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
2025 and beyond2.40 %2.30 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Discount rate2.90 %2.50 %3.25 %2.90 %2.50 %3.20 %
Expected return on plan assets4.70 6.00 6.50 3.44 2.90 4.92 
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
            
Benefit obligations as of December 31:           
Discount rate3.60% 4.05% 4.40%��3.60% 4.05% 4.35%
Rate of compensation increaseN/A
 N/A
 2.75
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A
            
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:          
Discount rate4.05% 4.40% 4.00% 4.05% 4.35% 3.99%
Expected return on plan assets7.25
 7.50
 7.50
 7.25
 7.50
 7.08
Rate of compensation increaseN/A
 2.75
 2.75
 N/A
 N/A
 N/A


In establishing its assumption as to the expected return on plan assets, PacifiCorp utilizes the asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets.


As a result of a plan amendment effective on January 1, 2017, the benefit obligation for the Retirement Plan is no longer affected by future increases in compensation. As a result of a labor settlement reached with UMWA in December 2014, the benefit obligation for the other postretirement plan is no longer affected by healthcare cost trends.



Contributions and Benefit Payments


Employer contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are expected to be $4 million and $-$— million, respectively, during 2018.2023. Funding to PacifiCorp's Retirement Plan trust is based upon the actuarially determined costs of the plan and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") and the Pension Protection Act of 2006, as amended ("PPA"PPA of 2006"). PacifiCorp considers contributing additional amounts from time to time in order to achieve certain funding levels specified under the PPA. PacifiCorp's fundingPPA of 2006. PacifiCorp evaluates a variety of factors, including funded status, income tax laws and regulatory requirements, in determining contributions to its other postretirement benefit plan is subject to tax deductibility and subordination limits and other considerations.plan.


224


The expected benefit payments to participants in PacifiCorp's pension and other postretirement benefit plans for 20182023 through 20222027 and for the five years thereafter are summarized below (in millions):
Projected Benefit Payments
PensionOther Postretirement
2023$76 $23 
202473 22 
202570 21 
202667 20 
202764 20 
2028-2032277 87 
 Projected Benefit Payments
 Pension Other Postretirement
    
2018$108
 $25
2019107
 25
2020103
 26
202199
 23
202294
 23
2023-2027393
 100


Plan Assets


Investment Policy and Asset Allocations


PacifiCorp's investment policy for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans is to balance risk and return through a diversified portfolio of debt securities, equity securities and other alternative investments. Maturities for debt securities are managed to targets consistent with prudent risk tolerances. The plans retain outside investment advisorsconsultants to manageadvise on plan investments within the parameters outlined by the PacifiCorp PensionBerkshire Hathaway Energy Company Investment Committee. The investment portfolio is managed in line with the investment policy with sufficient liquidity to meet near-term benefit payments.


In 2020, the assets of the PacifiCorp Master Retirement Trust were transferred into the BHE Master Retirement Trust.

The target allocations (percentage of plan assets) for PacifiCorp's pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets are as follows as of December 31, 2017:2022:
Pension(1)
Other Postretirement(1)
%%
Debt securities(2)
7377
Equity securities(2)
2223
Other50

(1)The trust in which the PacifiCorp Retirement Plan is invested includes a separate account that is used to fund benefits for the other postretirement benefit plan. In addition to this separate account, the assets for the other postretirement benefit plan are held in Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association ("VEBA") trusts, each of which has its own investment allocation strategies. Target allocations for the other postretirement benefit plan include the separate account of the Retirement Plan trust and the VEBA trusts.
(2)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds are allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.

225

Pension(1)

Other Postretirement(1)
%%
Debt securities(2)
33 - 3833 - 37
Equity securities(2)
49 - 6061 - 65
Limited partnership interests7 - 121 - 3
Other0 - 10 - 1

(1)PacifiCorp's Retirement Plan trust includes a separate account that is used to fund benefits for the other postretirement benefit plan. In addition to this separate account, the assets for the other postretirement benefit plan are held in Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association ("VEBA") trusts, each of which has its own investment allocation strategies. Target allocations for the other postretirement benefit plan include the separate account of the Retirement Plan trust and the VEBA trusts.
(2)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds are allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.


Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for PacifiCorp's defined benefit pension plan (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash equivalents$— $10 $— $10 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations41 — — 41 
Corporate obligations— 211 — 211 
Municipal obligations— 15 — 15 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 34 — 34 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies69 — — 69 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$110 $270 $— $380 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
346 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
32 
Investments at fair value$758 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash equivalents$— $15 $— $15 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations51 — — 51 
Corporate obligations— 299 — 299 
Municipal obligations— 22 — 22 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 38 — 38 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies61 — — 61 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$112 $374 $— $486 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
538 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
34 
Investments at fair value$1,058 

(1)Refer to Note 13 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)Investment funds are substantially comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 50% and 50%, respectively, for 2022 and 59% and 41%, respectively, for 2021, and are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 90% and 10%, respectively, for 2022 and 84% and 16%, respectively, for 2021.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate.

226

  Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements  
  
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(1)
 
Level 3(1)
 Total
As of December 31, 2017:        
Cash equivalents $
 $43
 $
 $43
Debt securities:        
United States government obligations 45
 
 
 45
Corporate obligations 
 60
 
 60
Municipal obligations 
 9
 
 9
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations 
 37
 
 37
Equity securities:        
United States companies 416
 
 
 416
International companies 22
 
 
 22
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy $483
 $149
 $
 632
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
       416
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
       63
Investments at fair value       $1,111
         
As of December 31, 2016:        
Cash equivalents $
 $10
 $
 $10
Debt securities:        
United States government obligations 25
 
 
 25
Corporate obligations 
 36
 
 36
Municipal obligations 
 6
 
 6
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations 
 37
 
 37
Equity securities:        
United States companies 389
 
 
 389
International companies 15
 
 
 15
Investment funds(2)
 83
 
 
 83
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy $512
 $89
 $
 601
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
       337
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
       61
Investments at fair value       $999


(1)Refer to Note 12 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Investment funds are substantially comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 60% and 40% respectively, for 2017 and 54% and 46%, respectively, for 2016, and are invested in United States and international securities of approximately 57% and 43%, respectively, for 2017 and 39% and 61%, respectively, for 2016.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.

The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for PacifiCorp's defined benefit other postretirement plan (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash and cash equivalents$$$— $10 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations— — 
Corporate obligations— 49 — 49 
Municipal obligations— 13 — 13 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 47 — 47 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies— — 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$18 $114 $— 132 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
132 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
— 
Investments at fair value$264 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash and cash equivalents$$$— $
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations24 — — 24 
Corporate obligations— 79 — 79 
Municipal obligations— 15 — 15 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 35 — 35 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies— — 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$32 $130 $— 162 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
161 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
Investments at fair value$324 
  Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements  
  
Level 1(1)
 
Level 2(1)
 
Level 3(1)
 Total
As of December 31, 2017:        
Cash and cash equivalents $4
 $3
 $
 $7
Debt securities:        
United States government obligations 11
 
 
 11
Corporate obligations 
 16
 
 16
Municipal obligations 
 2
 
 2
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations 
 16
 
 16
Equity securities:        
United States companies 98
 
 
 98
International companies 6
 
 
 6
Investment funds(2)
 32
 
 
 32
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy $151
 $37
 $
 188
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
       140
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
       4
Investments at fair value       $332
         
As of December 31, 2016:        
Cash and cash equivalents $4
 $1
 $
 $5
Debt securities:        
United States government obligations 11
 
 
 11
Corporate obligations 
 13
 
 13
Municipal obligations 
 2
 
 2
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations 
 13
 
 13
Equity securities:        
United States companies 93
 
 
 93
International companies 4
 
 
 4
Investment funds(2)
 32
 
 
 32
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy $144
 $29
 $
 173
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
       125
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
       4
Investments at fair value       $302


(1)Refer to Note 13 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(1)Refer to Note 12 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Investment funds are substantially comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 63% and 37%, respectively, for 2017 and 62% and 38%, respectively, for 2016, and are invested in United States and international securities of approximately 77% and 23%, respectively, for 2017 and 71% and 29%, respectively, for 2016.
(2)Investment funds are substantially comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 41% and 59%, respectively, for 2022 and 39% and 61%, respectively, for 2021, and are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 91% and 9%, respectively, for 2022 and 90% and 10%, respectively, for 2021.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.

(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.
For level 1 investments, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value. For level 2 investments, the fair value is determined using pricing models based on observable market inputs. Shares of mutual funds not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, private equity limited partnership interests, common and commingled trust funds and investment entities are reported at fair value based on the net asset value per unit, which is used for expedience purposes. A fund's net asset value is based on the fair value of the underlying assets held by the fund less its liabilities.



Multiemployer and Joint Trustee Pension PlansHydroelectric Relicensing


PacifiCorp contributesis a party to the PacifiCorp/IBEW Local 57 Retirement Trust Fund2016 amended Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement ("Local 57 Trust Fund"KHSA"), which is intended to resolve disputes surrounding PacifiCorp's efforts to relicense the Klamath Hydroelectric Project. The KHSA establishes a process for PacifiCorp, the states of Oregon and California ("States") (plan number 001)and other stakeholders to assess whether dam removal can occur consistent with the settlement's terms. For PacifiCorp, the key elements of the settlement include: (1) a contribution from PacifiCorp's Oregon and California customers capped at $200 million plus $250 million in California bond funds; (2) complete indemnification from harms associated with dam removal; (3) transfer of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") license to a third-party dam removal entity, the Klamath River Renewal Corporation ("KRRC"), who would conduct dam removal; and (4) ability for PacifiCorp to operate the facilities for the benefit of customers until dam removal commences.

In September 2016, the KRRC and PacifiCorp filed a joint application with the FERC to transfer the license for the four mainstem Klamath hydroelectric dams comprising the Lower Klamath Project (FERC Project No. 14803) from PacifiCorp to the KRRC. The FERC approved the partial transfer of the Klamath license in a July 2020 order, subject to the condition that PacifiCorp remains co-licensee. Under the amended KHSA, PacifiCorp did not agree to remain co-licensee during the surrender and removal process given concerns about liability protections for PacifiCorp and its subsidiary, Energy West Miningcustomers. In November 2020, PacifiCorp entered a memorandum of agreement (the "MOA") with the KRRC, the Karuk Tribe, the Yurok Tribe and the States to continue implementation of the KHSA. The agreement required the States, PacifiCorp and KRRC to file a new license transfer application to remove PacifiCorp from the license for the Lower Klamath Project and add the States and KRRC as co-licensees for the purposes of surrender. In addition, the MOA provides for additional contingency funding of $45 million, equally split between PacifiCorp and the States, and for PacifiCorp and the States to equally share in any additional cost overruns in the unlikely event that dam removal costs exceed the $450 million in funding to ensure dam removal is complete. The MOA also requires PacifiCorp to cover the costs associated with certain pre-existing environmental conditions. In June 2021, the FERC approved the transfer of the Lower Klamath Project dams from PacifiCorp to the KRRC and the States as co-licensees. In July 2021, the Oregon, Wyoming, Idaho and California state public utility commissions conditionally approved the required property transfer applications. In August 2021, PacifiCorp notified the Public Service Commission of Utah of the property transfer, however no formal approval is required in Utah. In August 2022, the FERC staff issued a final environmental impact statement for the project, concluding that dam removal is the preferred action. In November 2022, the FERC issued a license surrender order for the project, which was accepted by the KRRC and the States in December 2022, along with the transfer of the Lower Klamath Project dams. Although PacifiCorp no longer owns the Lower Klamath Project, PacifiCorp will continue to operate the facilities under an operation and maintenance agreement with the KRRC until each facility is ready for removal. Removal of the Copco No. 2 facility is anticipated to begin in 2023, and removal of the remaining three dams (J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, and Iron Gate) is anticipated to begin in 2024.

Hydroelectric Commitments

Certain of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric licenses and settlement agreements contain requirements for PacifiCorp to make certain capital and operating expenditures related to its hydroelectric facilities, which are estimated to be approximately $282 million over the next 10 years.

Legal Matters

The Company previouslyis party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. The Company does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. The Company is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties and other costs in substantial amounts and are described below.

Wildfires Overview - PacifiCorp

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. PacifiCorp evaluates the related range of reasonably estimated losses and records a loss based on its best estimate within that range or the lower end of the range if there is no better estimate.


170


In California, under inverse condemnation, courts have held that investor-owned utilities can be liable for real and personal property damages from wildfires without the utility being found negligent and regardless of fault. California law also permits inverse condemnation plaintiffs to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs. In both Oregon and California, PacifiCorp has equipment in areas accessed through special use permits, easements or similar agreements that may contain provisions requiring it to pay for damages caused by its equipment regardless of fault. Even if inverse condemnation or other provisions do not apply, PacifiCorp could be found liable for all damages proximately caused by negligence, including real and personal property and natural resource damages; fire suppression costs; personal injury and loss of life damages; and interest.

2020 Wildfires

In September 2020, a severe weather event resulting in high winds, low humidity and warm temperatures contributed to several major wildfires, which resulted in real and personal property and natural resource damage, personal injuries and loss of life and widespread power outages in Oregon and Northern California (the "2020 Wildfires"). The wildfires spread across certain parts of PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas across multiple counties in Oregon and California, including Siskiyou County, California; Jackson County, Oregon; Douglas County, Oregon; Marion County, Oregon; Lincoln County, Oregon; and Klamath County, Oregon burning over 500,000 acres in aggregate. Third party reports for these wildfires indicate over 2,000 structures destroyed, including residences; several structures damaged; multiple individuals injured; and several fatalities. Fire suppression costs estimated by various agencies total approximately $150 million.

Investigations into the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan (plan number 002). Contributions to these pension planscause and origin of each wildfire are based oncomplex and ongoing and being conducted by various entities, including the termsU.S. Forest Service, the California Public Utilities Commission, the Oregon Department of collective bargaining agreements.Forestry, the Oregon Department of Justice, PacifiCorp and various experts engaged by PacifiCorp.


As a result of the Utah Mine Dispositiondate of this filing, numerous lawsuits have been filed in Oregon and UMWA labor settlement,California, including a class action complaint in Oregon, on behalf of plaintiffs related to the 2020 Wildfires. The plaintiffs seek damages that include property damages, economic losses, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and other damages. Additionally, several insurance carriers have filed subrogation complaints in Oregon and California with allegations similar to those made in the aforementioned lawsuits. The final determinations of liability, however, will only be made following the completion of comprehensive investigations and litigation processes.

PacifiCorp has accrued cumulative estimated probable losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $477 million through December 31, 2022. The accrual includes PacifiCorp's subsidiary, Energy West Mining Company, triggered involuntary withdrawal from the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan in June 2015 when the UMWA employees ceased performing work for the subsidiary. PacifiCorp recorded its estimate of the withdrawal obligation in December 2014 when withdrawal waslosses for fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages that are considered probable of being incurred and deferredthat it is reasonably able to estimate at this time. For certain aspects of the 2020 Wildfires for which loss is considered probable, information necessary to reasonably estimate the potential losses, such as those related to certain areas of natural resource damages, is not currently available.

It is reasonably possible PacifiCorp will incur additional losses beyond the amounts accrued; however, PacifiCorp is currently unable to estimate the range of possible additional losses that could be incurred due to the number of properties and parties involved and the variation in those types of properties and lack of available details. To the extent losses beyond the amounts accrued are incurred, additional insurance coverage is expected to be available to cover a portion of the obligation considered probable of recovery to a regulatory asset. PacifiCorp has subsequently revised its estimate due to changes in facts and circumstances for a withdrawal occurring by July 2015. As communicated in a letter received in August 2016, the plan trustees have determined a withdrawal liability of $115 million. Energy West Mining Company began making installment payments in November 2016 and has the option to elect a lump sum payment to settle the withdrawal obligation. The ultimate amount paid by Energy West Mining Company to settle the obligation is dependent on a variety of factors, including the results of ongoing negotiations with the plan trustees.losses.

The Local 57 Trust Fund is a joint trustee plan such that the board of trustees is represented by an equal number of trustees from PacifiCorp and the union. The Local 57 Trust Fund was established pursuant to the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act and although formed with the ability for other employers to participate in the plan, there are no other employers that participate in this plan.

The risk of participating in multiemployer pension plans generally differs from single-employer plans in that assets are pooled such that contributions by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers and plan assets cannot revert back to employers. If an employer ceases participation in the plan, the employer may be obligated to pay a withdrawal liability based on the participants' unfunded, vested benefits in the plan. This occurred as a result of Energy West Mining Company's withdrawal from the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan. If participating employers withdraw from a multiemployer plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers, including any employers that withdrew during the three years prior to a mass withdrawal.


The following table presents PacifiCorp's and Energy West Mining Company's participation in individually significant joint trustee and multiemployer pension plans for the years ended December 31 (dollars in millions):

    PPA zone status or            
    plan funded status percentage for            
    plan years beginning July 1,     
Contributions(1)
  
Plan name Employer Identification Number 2017 2016 2015 Funding improvement plan 
Surcharge imposed under PPA(1)
 2017 2016 2015 
Year contributions to plan exceeded more than 5% of total contributions(2)
UMWA 1974 Pension Plan 52-1050282 Critical and Declining Critical and Declining Critical and Declining Implemented Yes $
 $
 $1
 None
Local 57 Trust Fund 87-0640888 At least 80% At least 80% At least 80% None None $7
 $8
 $8
 2015, 2014, 2013

(1)PacifiCorp's and Energy West Mining Company's minimum contributions to the plans are based on the amount of wages paid to employees covered by the Local 57 Trust Fund collective bargaining agreements and the number of mining hours worked for the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan, respectively, subject to ERISA minimum funding requirements. As a result of the plan's critical status, Energy West Mining Company was required to begin paying a surcharge for hours worked on and after December 1, 2014.

(2)For the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan, information is for plan years beginning July 1, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Information for the plan year beginning July 1, 2016 is not yet available. For the Local 57 Trust Fund, information is for plan years beginning July 1, 2015, 2014 and 2013. Information for the plan year beginning July 1, 2016 is not yet available.

The current collective bargaining agreements governing the Local 57 Trust Fund expire in 2020.


Defined Contribution Plan

PacifiCorp's 401(k) plan covers substantially all employees. PacifiCorp's matching contributions are based on each participant's level of contribution and, as of January 1, 2017, all participants receive contributions based on eligible pre-tax annual compensation. Contributions cannot exceed the maximum allowable for tax purposes. PacifiCorp's contributions to the 401(k) plan were $39 million, $34 million and $35 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

(10)Asset Retirement Obligations

PacifiCorp estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes inPacifiCorp's liability for estimated losses associated with the amount and timing of the expected work.

PacifiCorp does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Cost of removal regulatory liabilities totaled $955 million and $917 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of PacifiCorp's ARO liabilities2020 Wildfires for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$252 $252 $— 
Accrued losses225 — 252 
Payments(53)— — 
Ending balance$424 $252 $252 

PacifiCorp's receivable for expected insurance recoveries associated with the probable losses was $246 million and $116 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, PacifiCorp recognized probable losses net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively.

171


 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$215
 $224
Change in estimated costs(8) 2
Additions6
 
Retirements(6) (19)
Accretion8
 8
Ending balance$215
 $215
    
Reflected as:   
Other current liabilities$25
 $21
Other long-term liabilities190
 194
 $215
 $215
2022 McKinney Fire


According to California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, on July 29, 2022, at approximately 2:16 p.m. Pacific Time, a wildfire began in the Oak Knoll Ranger District of the Klamath National Forest in Siskiyou County, California (the "2022 McKinney Fire") located in PacifiCorp's service territory. Third party reports indicate that the 2022 McKinney Fire resulted in 11 structures damaged, 185 structures destroyed, 12 injuries and four fatalities and consumed 60,000 acres. The cause of the 2022 McKinney Fire is undetermined and remains under investigation by the U.S. Forest Service.

Due to the preliminary nature of the investigation PacifiCorp does not believe a loss is probable and therefore has not accrued any loss as of the date of this filing. While the loss is not probable, PacifiCorp estimates the potential loss, excluding losses for natural resource damages, to be $31 million, net of expected insurance recoveries. The loss estimate includes PacifiCorp's estimate of losses for fire suppression costs; real and personal property damages; and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. PacifiCorp is unable to estimate the total potential loss, including losses for natural resource damages, because there are a number of unknown facts and legal considerations that may impact the amount of any potential liability, including the total scope and nature of claims that may be asserted against PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp has insurance available and estimates the potential insurance recoveries to be $103 million, to cover potential losses.

As of the date of this filing, multiple lawsuits have been filed in California on behalf of plaintiffs related to the 2022 McKinney Fire. The plaintiffs seek damages that include property damages, economic losses, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and other damages but the amount of damages sought are not specified. The final determinations of liability, however, will only be made following the completion of comprehensive investigations and litigation processes.

Guarantees

The Company has entered into guarantees as part of the normal course of business and the sale of certain assets. These guarantees are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial results.

(17)    Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Energy Products and Services

The following table summarizes the Company's energy products and services Customer Revenue by regulated energy and nonregulated energy, with further disaggregation of regulated energy by line of business, including a reconciliation to the Company's reportable segment information included in Note 22, for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
2022
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$5,099 $2,320 $3,465 $— $— $— $— $— $10,884 
Retail Gas— 855 167 — — — — — 1,022 
Wholesale260 668 92 — — — (4)1,024 
Transmission and
   distribution
166 61 76 1,081 — 683 — — 2,067 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 2,603 — — (127)2,476 
Other102 — — — — (2)105 
Total Regulated5,627 3,904 3,802 1,081 2,614 683 — (133)17,578 
Nonregulated— — 169 1,076 70 866 597 2,785 
Total Customer Revenue5,627 3,911 3,802 1,250 3,690 753 866 464 20,363 
Other revenue52 114 22 115 154 (21)128 142 706 
Total$5,679 $4,025 $3,824 $1,365 $3,844 $732 $994 $606 $21,069 
172


2021
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$4,847 $2,128 $2,828 $— $— $— $— $(2)$9,801 
Retail Gas— 859 115 — — — — — 974 
Wholesale157 454 62 — 57 — — (3)727 
Transmission and
   distribution
143 58 74 1,023 — 702 — — 2,000 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 2,404 — — (131)2,273 
Other108 — — (1)— — 109 
Total Regulated5,255 3,499 3,080 1,023 2,460 702 — (135)15,884 
Nonregulated— 15 43 956 35 796 576 2,424 
Total Customer Revenue5,255 3,514 3,083 1,066 3,416 737 796 441 18,308 
Other revenue41 33 24 122 128 (6)185 100 627 
Total$5,296 $3,547 $3,107 $1,188 $3,544 $731 $981 $541 $18,935 
2020
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$4,932 $1,924 $2,566 $— $— $— $— $(1)$9,421 
Retail Gas— 505 114 — — — — — 619 
Wholesale107 199 45 — 17 — — (2)366 
Transmission and
   distribution
96 60 95 887 — 641 — — 1,779 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 1,397 — — (139)1,258 
Other108 — — — — — — 110 
Total Regulated5,243 2,688 2,822 887 1,414 641 — (142)13,553 
Nonregulated— 16 26 134 18 817 515 1,528 
Total Customer Revenue5,243 2,704 2,824 913 1,548 659 817 373 15,081 
Other revenue98 24 30 109 30 — 119 65 475 
Total$5,341 $2,728 $2,854 $1,022 $1,578 $659 $936 $438 $15,556 
(1)The BHE and Other reportable segment represents amounts related principally to other entities, including MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

Real Estate Services

The following table summarizes the Company's real estate services Customer Revenue by line of business for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
HomeServices
202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Brokerage$4,867 $5,498 $4,520 
Franchise66 85 76 
Total Customer Revenue4,933 5,583 4,596 
Mortgage and other revenue335 632 800 
Total$5,268 $6,215 $5,396 
173


Remaining Performance Obligations

The following table summarizes the Company's revenue it expects to recognize in future periods related to significant unsatisfied remaining performance obligations for fixed contracts with expected durations in excess of one year as of December 31, 2022, by reportable segment (in millions):
Performance obligations expected to be satisfied
Less than 12 monthsMore than 12 monthsTotal
BHE Pipeline Group$2,835 $20,619 $23,454 
BHE Transmission679 — 679 
Total$3,514 $20,619 $24,133 

(18)BHE Shareholders' Equity

Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, BHE had 849,982 and 1,649,988 shares outstanding of its Perpetual Preferred Stock (the "4% Perpetual Preferred Stock") issued to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. The 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and currently pays a 4.00% dividend per share on the liquidation preference. Dividends shall accrue and accumulate daily, be cumulative, compound semi-annually and, if declared, be payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year. If dividends are not declared and paid, any accumulating dividends shall continue to accumulate and compound. BHE may not make any dividends on shares of any other class or series of its capital stock (other than for dividends on shares of common stock payable in shares of common stock, unless the holders of the then outstanding 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock shall first receive, or simultaneously receive, a dividend in an amount at least equivalent to the amount accumulated and not previously paid. BHE may not declare or pay any dividends on shares of the 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock if such declaration or payment would constitute an event of default on BHE's senior indebtedness (as defined). BHE may, at its option, redeem the 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock in whole or in part at any time at a price per share equal to the liquidation preference.

Common Stock

On March 14, 2000, and as amended on December 7, 2005, BHE's shareholders entered into a Shareholder Agreement that provides specific rights to certain shareholders. One of these rights allows certain shareholders the ability to put their common shares to BHE at the then-current fair value dependent on certain circumstances controlled by BHE.

In June 2022, BHE purchased 740,961 shares of its common stock held by Mr. Gregory E. Abel, BHE's Chair, for $870 million. The purchase was pursuant to the terms of BHE's Shareholders Agreement.

Restricted Net Assets

BHE has maximum debt-to-total capitalization percentage restrictions imposed by its senior unsecured credit facilities expiring in June 2025 which, in certain circumstances, limit BHE's ability to make cash dividends or distributions. As a result of this restriction, BHE has restricted net assets of $18.8 billion as of December 31, 2022.

Certain of PacifiCorp's decommissioningBHE's subsidiaries have restrictions on their ability to dividend, loan or advance funds to BHE due to specific legal or regulatory restrictions, including, but not limited to, maximum debt-to-total capitalization percentages and reclamation obligations relatecommitments made to jointly owned facilitiesstate commissions. As a result of these restrictions, BHE's subsidiaries had restricted net assets of $20.4 billion as of December 31, 2022.


174


(19)Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

The following table shows the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss attributable to BHE shareholders by each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income taxes, for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
UnrecognizedForeignUnrealizedAOCI
Amounts onCurrencyGains (Losses)Attributable
RetirementTranslationon Cash FlowNoncontrollingTo BHE
BenefitsAdjustmentHedgesInterestsShareholders, Net
Balance, December 31, 2019$(417)$(1,296)$$— $(1,706)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(65)234 (15)— 154 
BHE GT&S acquisition(10)— — 10 — 
Balance, December 31, 2020(492)(1,062)(8)10 (1,552)
Other comprehensive income (loss)174 (24)67 (5)212 
Balance, December 31, 2021(318)(1,086)59 (1,340)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(72)(810)76 (3)(809)
Balance, December 31, 2022$(390)$(1,896)$135 $$(2,149)

Reclassifications from AOCI to net income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and mine sites. PacifiCorp2020 were insignificant. Additionally, refer to the "Foreign Operations" discussion in Note 13 for information about unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits reclassifications from AOCI that do not impact net income in their entirety.

(20)Variable Interest Entities and Noncontrolling Interests

The primary beneficiary of a VIE is committedrequired to payconsolidate the VIE and to disclose certain information about its significant variable interests in the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a proportionate shareVIE is the entity that has both (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

As part of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. InGT&S Transaction, BHE acquired an indirect 25% economic interest in Cove Point, consisting of 100% of the general partnership interest and 25% of the total limited partnership interests. BHE concluded that Cove Point is a VIE due to the limited partners lacking the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. BHE is the primary beneficiary of Cove Point as it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact its economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses and benefits which could be significant to it.

Included in noncontrolling interests on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are (i) Dominion Energy's 50% interest in Cove Point and Brookfield Super-Core Infrastructure Partner's 25% interest in Cove Point and (ii) preferred securities of subsidiaries of $58 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, consisting of $56 million of 8.061% cumulative preferred securities of Northern Electric plc, a subsidiary of Northern Powergrid, which are redeemable in the event of the revocation of Northern Electric plc's electricity distribution license by the Secretary of State, and $2 million of nonredeemable preferred stock of PacifiCorp.

175


(21)Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$2,071 $2,041 $1,855 
Income taxes received, net(1)
$1,863 $1,309 $1,361 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$1,049 $834 $801 

(1)Includes $1,961 million, $1,441 million and $1,504 million of income taxes received from Berkshire Hathaway in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

(22)Segment Information

The Company's reportable segments with foreign operations include Northern Powergrid, whose business is principally in the United Kingdom, and BHE Transmission, whose business includes operations in Canada. Intersegment eliminations and adjustments, including the allocation of goodwill, have been made. Information related to the Company's reportable segments is shown below (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
PacifiCorp$5,679 $5,296 $5,341 
MidAmerican Funding4,025 3,547 2,728 
NV Energy3,824 3,107 2,854 
Northern Powergrid1,365 1,188 1,022 
BHE Pipeline Group3,844 3,544 1,578 
BHE Transmission732 731 659 
BHE Renewables994 981 936 
HomeServices5,268 6,215 5,396 
BHE and Other(1)
606 541 438 
Total operating revenue$26,337 $25,150 $20,952 
   
Depreciation and amortization:   
PacifiCorp$1,120 $1,088 $1,209 
MidAmerican Funding1,168 914 716 
NV Energy566 549 502 
Northern Powergrid361 305 266 
BHE Pipeline Group508 492 231 
BHE Transmission239 238 201 
BHE Renewables264 241 284 
HomeServices56 52 45 
BHE and Other(1)
Total depreciation and amortization$4,286 $3,881 $3,455 
   
176


Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating income:
PacifiCorp$1,158 $1,133 $924 
MidAmerican Funding438 416 454 
NV Energy606 621 649 
Northern Powergrid551 543 421 
BHE Pipeline Group1,720 1,516 779 
BHE Transmission333 339 316 
BHE Renewables300 329 291 
HomeServices151 505 511 
BHE and Other(1)
(16)(75)(54)
Total operating income5,241 5,327 4,291 
Interest expense(2,216)(2,118)(2,021)
Capitalized interest76 64 80 
Allowance for equity funds167 126 165 
Interest and dividend income154 89 71 
(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net(2,002)1,823 4,797 
Other, net(7)(17)88 
Total income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss$1,413 $5,294 $7,471 
Interest expense:
PacifiCorp$431 $430 $426 
MidAmerican Funding333 319 322 
NV Energy221 206 227 
Northern Powergrid133 130 130 
BHE Pipeline Group148 143 74 
BHE Transmission153 155 148 
BHE Renewables175 158 166 
HomeServices11 
BHE and Other(1)
615 573 517 
Total interest expense$2,216 $2,118 $2,021 
Income tax (benefit) expense:
PacifiCorp$(61)$(78)$(75)
MidAmerican Funding(776)(680)(574)
NV Energy56 56 61 
Northern Powergrid75 192 96 
BHE Pipeline Group276 269 162 
BHE Transmission14 10 13 
BHE Renewables(2)
(887)(753)(602)
HomeServices47 138 138 
BHE and Other(1)
(660)(286)1,089 
Total income tax (benefit) expense$(1,916)$(1,132)$308 
177


Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Earnings on common shares:
PacifiCorp$921 $889 $741 
MidAmerican Funding947 883 818 
NV Energy427 439 410 
Northern Powergrid385 247 201 
BHE Pipeline Group1,040 807 528 
BHE Transmission247 247 231 
BHE Renewables(2)
625 451 521 
HomeServices100 387 375 
BHE and Other(1)
(2,017)1,319 3,092 
Total earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $6,917 
Capital expenditures:
PacifiCorp$2,166 $1,513 $2,540 
MidAmerican Funding1,869 1,912 1,836 
NV Energy1,113 749 675 
Northern Powergrid768 742 682 
BHE Pipeline Group1,157 1,128 659 
BHE Transmission200 279 372 
BHE Renewables138 225 95 
HomeServices48 42 36 
BHE and Other46 21 (130)
Total capital expenditures$7,505 $6,611 $6,765 
As of December 31,
202220212020
Property, plant and equipment, net:
PacifiCorp$24,430 $22,914 $22,430 
MidAmerican Funding21,092 20,302 19,279 
NV Energy10,993 10,231 9,865 
Northern Powergrid7,445 7,572 7,230 
BHE Pipeline Group16,216 15,692 15,097 
BHE Transmission6,209 6,590 6,445 
BHE Renewables6,231 6,103 5,645 
HomeServices188 169 159 
BHE and Other239 243 (22)
Total property, plant and equipment, net$93,043 $89,816 $86,128 
178


As of December 31,
202220212020
Total assets:
PacifiCorp$30,559 $27,615 $26,862 
MidAmerican Funding26,077 25,352 23,530 
NV Energy16,676 15,239 14,501 
Northern Powergrid9,005 9,326 8,782 
BHE Pipeline Group21,005 20,434 19,541 
BHE Transmission9,334 9,476 9,208 
BHE Renewables11,458 11,829 12,004 
HomeServices3,436 4,574 4,955 
BHE and Other6,290 8,220 7,933 
Total assets$133,840 $132,065 $127,316 
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue by country:
U.S.$24,263 $23,215 $19,254 
United Kingdom1,345 1,188 1,022 
Canada709 719 653 
Australia20 — — 
Other— 28 23 
Total operating revenue by country$26,337 $25,150 $20,952 
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss by country:
U.S.$771 $4,650 $6,954 
United Kingdom447 454 338 
Canada181 181 173 
Australia15 (8)— 
Other(1)17 
Total income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss by country$1,413 $5,294 $7,471 
As of December 31,
202220212020
Property, plant and equipment, net by country:
U.S.$79,578 $75,774 $72,583 
United Kingdom6,959 7,487 7,134 
Canada6,091 6,547 6,401 
Australia415 10 
Total property, plant and equipment, net by country$93,043 $89,816 $86,128 

(1)The differences between the reportable segment amounts and the consolidated amounts, described as BHE and Other, relate to other corporate entities, including MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

(2)Income tax (benefit) expense includes the tax attributes of disregarded entities that are not required to pay income taxes and the earnings of which are taxable directly to BHE.

179


The following table shows the change in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in millions):
BHE
MidAmericanNVNorthernPipelineBHEBHE
PacifiCorpFundingEnergyPowergridGroupTransmissionRenewablesHomeServicesTotal
December 31, 2020$1,129 $2,102 $2,369 $1,000 $1,803 $1,551 $95 $1,457 $11,506 
Acquisitions— — — — 11 — — 129 140 
Foreign currency translation— — — (8)— 12 — — 
December 31, 20211,129 2,102 2,369 992 1,814 1,563 95 1,586 11,650 
Acquisitions— — — — — — — 16 16 
Foreign currency translation— — — (75)— (102)— — (177)
December 31, 2022$1,129 $2,102 $2,369 $917 $1,814 $1,461 $95 $1,602 $11,489 

180


PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section

181


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of PacifiCorp during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with PacifiCorp's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. PacifiCorp's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

Results of Operations

Overview

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2022, was $920 million, an increase of $32 million, or 4%, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher utility margin, lower other expense, including higher allowance for equity and borrowed funds used during construction and lower property and other taxes, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance expense, largely due to higher general and plant maintenance costs and an increase to the wildfire damage provision, higher depreciation and amortization expense, and lower income tax benefit. Utility margin increased primarily due to higher net power cost deferrals, higher retail prices and volumes, higher average wholesale market prices, lower coal-fueled generation volumes and higher net wheeling revenues, partially offset by higher natural gas-fueled generation prices and volumes, higher purchased electricity costs from higher volumes and prices, higher coal-fueled generation prices, lower wind-based ancillary revenues, and lower wholesale volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.6% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable impacts of weather and an increase in commercial customer usage, partially offset by a defaultdecrease in residential and industrial customer usage. Energy generated decreased 4% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due lower coal-fueled generation, partially offset by higher wind-powered, natural gas-fueled and hydroelectric-powered generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes decreased 5% and purchased electricity volumes increased 20%.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $888 million, an increase of $149 million, or 20%, compared to 2020, primarily due to higher utility gross margin (excluding $231 million of decreases fully offset in depreciation, operating, other income/expense and income tax expense due to prior year regulatory adjustments); lower operations and maintenance expense primarily due to prior year costs associated with the 2020 Wildfires and changes in how obligations associated with the implementation of the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met; and favorable income tax expense from higher PTCs recognized due to new wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service and the impacts of ratemaking; partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense (excluding $376 million of decreases offset in operating revenue and income tax expense due to prior year regulatory adjustments) from the impacts of the depreciation study for which rates became effective January 2021 and higher plant in-service; and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction. Utility margin increased $145 million (excluding the $231 million of fully offsetting decreases) primarily due to the higher retail, wheeling and wholesale revenue; higher deferred net power costs; and lower purchased electricity volumes; partially offset by higher purchased electricity prices; and higher natural gas- and coal-fueled generation costs. Retail customer volumes increased 3.1% due to increase in customer usage, increase in the average number of customers and favorable impacts of weather. Energy generated increased 10% for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due higher wind-powered, natural gas-fueled and coal-fueled generation, partially offset by lower hydroelectric-powered generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes decreased 3% and purchased electricity volumes decreased 17%.

182


Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Management utilizes various key financial measures that are prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as, utility margin, to help evaluate results of operations. Utility margin is calculated as operating revenue less cost of fuel and energy, which are captions presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

PacifiCorp's cost of fuel and energy is generally recovered from its retail customers through regulatory recovery mechanisms and, as a result, changes in PacifiCorp's expenses included in regulatory recovery mechanisms result in comparable changes to revenue. As such, management believes utility margin more appropriately and concisely explains profitability rather than a discussion of revenue and cost of fuel and energy separately. Management believes the presentation of utility margin provides meaningful and valuable insight into the information management considers important to running the business and a measure of comparability to others in the industry.
Utility margin is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating income, which is the most directly comparable financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table provides a reconciliation of utility margin to operating income for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin:
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 148 1,831 1,790 41 
Utility margin3,700 3,465 235 3,465 3,551 (86)(2)
Operations and maintenance1,227 1,031 196 19 1,031 1,209 (178)(15)
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 32 1,088 1,209 (121)(10)
Property and other taxes195 213 (18)(8)213 209 
Operating income$1,158 $1,133 $25 %$1,133 $924 $209 23 %

183


Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to utility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 148 1,831 1,790 41 
Utility margin$3,700 $3,465 $235 %$3,465 $3,551 $(86)(2)%
Sales (GWhs):
Residential18,425 17,905 520 %17,905 17,150 755 %
Commercial(1)
19,570 18,839 731 18,839 17,727 1,112 
Industrial(1)
17,622 17,909 (287)(2)17,909 18,039 (130)(1)
Other(1)
1,547 1,621 (74)(5)1,621 1,644 (23)(1)
Total retail57,164 56,274 890 56,274 54,560 1,714 
Wholesale4,836 5,113 (277)(5)5,113 5,249 (136)(3)
Total sales62,000 61,387 613 %61,387 59,809 1,578 %
Average number of retail customers
(in thousands)2,037 2,003 34 %2,003 1,967 36 %
Average revenue per MWh:
Retail$89.33 $86.08 $3.25 %$86.08 $90.59 $(4.51)(5)%
Wholesale$61.39 $37.90 $23.49 62 %$37.90 $35.56 $2.34 %
Heating degree days10,767 9,914 853 %9,914 10,155 (241)(2)%
Cooling degree days2,451 2,431 20 %2,431 2,111 320 15 %
Sources of energy (GWhs)(1):
Coal28,390 31,566 (3,176)(10)%31,566 30,636 930 %
Natural gas13,686 13,323 363 13,323 12,045 1,278 11 
Wind(2)
7,238 6,686 552 6,686 3,769 2,917 77 
Hydroelectric and other(2)
3,206 3,010 196 3,010 3,223 (213)(7)
Total energy generated52,520 54,585 (2,065)(4)54,585 49,673 4,912 10 
Energy purchased13,968 11,601 2,367 20 11,601 14,054 (2,453)(17)
Total66,488 66,186 302 — %66,186 63,727 2,459 %
Average cost of energy per MWh:
Energy generated(3)
$22.86 $18.05 $4.81 27 %$18.05 $18.74 $(0.69)(4)%
Energy purchased$71.15 $66.93 $4.22 %$66.93 $47.60 $19.33 41 %

(1)    GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.
(2)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements or (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities.
(3)    The average cost per MWh of energy generated includes only the cost of fuel associated with the generating facilities.


184


Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021

Utility margin increased $235 million, or 7% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to:
$290 million from higher deferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms;
$263 million of higher retail revenue primarily due to higher average prices and higher volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.6% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable impacts of weather and an increase in commercial customer usage, partially offset by a decrease in residential and industrial customer usage;
$103 million of higher wholesale revenue primarily due to higher average market prices, partially offset by lower volumes;
$44 million of lower coal-fueled generation costs due to lower volumes, partially offset by higher average prices; and
$19 million of favorable wheeling activities.
The increases above were partially offset by:
$259 million of higher natural gas-fueled generation costs primarily due to higher average market prices and higher volumes;
$217 million of higher purchased electricity costs from higher volumes and higher average market prices; and
$10 million of lower wind-based ancillary revenue.

Operations and maintenance increased $196 million, or 19%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to a $64 million increase in the loss accruals associated with the September 2020 wildfires net of estimated insurance recoveries, $38 million of higher plant maintenance costs, $27 million of higher DSM amortization expense (offset in retail revenue), $25 million of changes in the prior year in how obligations associated with the implementation of the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met, $17 million of higher insurance premiums due to cost increases related to wildfire coverage, $37 million of higher consumption of materials, chemical and start-up fuel costs, partially offset by $22 million of deferrals of vegetation management costs in Oregon and Utah, net of higher vegetation management costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $32 million, or 3%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher plant-in-service balances in the current year and prior year deferral of the 2018 depreciation study in Idaho compared to current year amortization, partially offset by current year allocation adjustment for Oregon incremental depreciation of certain coal units and Oregon deferral associated with the depreciation of certain wind-powered generating facilities.

Property and other taxes decreased $18 million, or 8%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower property tax rates in Utah.

Allowance for borrowed and equity funds increased $28 million, or 38%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher qualified construction work-in-progress balances and higher rates.

Interest and dividend income increased $20 million, or 83%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to the recording of interest on the 2021 Oregon PCAM deferral and higher investment income due to higher average interest rates.

Other, net decreased$23 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies driven by market declines, unfavorable change in deferred compensation and long-term incentive plan primarily due to market movements (offset in operations and maintenance expense) and higher pension costs primarily due to lower expected return on net assets.

Income tax benefit decreased $17 million, or 22%, for 2022 compared to 2021. The effective tax rate was (7)% and (10)% for 2022 and 2021, respectively. The effective tax rate increased primarily as a result of lower effects of ratemaking associated with excess deferred income tax amortization and an increase to the valuation allowance for state net operating losses, partially offset by increased PTCs from PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities in the current year.

185


Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

Utility margin decreased $86 million (including the $231 million of fully offsetting decreases) for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to:
$111 million of higher purchased electricity costs due to higher average prices, partially offset by lower volumes;
$99 million of lower retail revenue primarily due to $234 million fully offset in depreciation expense, income tax expense, fuel expense, and other income (expense) due to accelerated depreciation of certain coal-fueled units in Utah and Oregon and recognition of certain Utah regulatory balances in the prior year, and lower average retail prices, partially offset by higher retail customer volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 3.1% due to an increase in residential and commercial customer usage, increase in the average number of customers and favorable impacts of weather, primarily in Oregon, Washington and Idaho;
$88 million of higher natural gas-fueled generation costs primarily due to higher average prices and higher volumes; and
$34 million of lower other revenue due to prior year recognition of previously deferred other revenue in Oregon that was used to accelerate the depreciation of certain retired wind equipment as a result of the 2020 Oregon RAC settlement (offset in depreciation expense).
The decreases above were partially offset by:
$141 million primarily from higher deferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms;
$43 million of favorable wheeling activities;
$33 million of lower coal-fueled generation costs primarily due to $37 million of accelerated recognition of certain Utah regulatory balances associated with the 2015 Utah mine disposition and certain Cholla Unit 4 related closure costs in Oregon and Idaho (offset in income tax expense) in the prior year and lower prices, partially offset by higher volumes;
$19 million of higher other revenue primarily due to higher REC, fly ash and by-product revenues; and
$7 million of higher wholesale revenue due to higher average wholesale market prices, partially offset by lower wholesale volumes.

Operations and maintenance decreased $178 million, or 15%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to prior year estimated losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $136 million, net of expected insurance recoveries, changes in how obligations associated with the implementation of the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met, lower thermal plant maintenance expense and lower labor expenses, partially offset by higher wind plant and distribution maintenance and higher legal and insurance expenses associated with the 2020 Wildfires.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $121 million, or 10%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to prior year accelerated depreciation of $376 million as a result of regulatory adjustments ordered by the UPSC, the OPUC and the IPUC (fully offset in retail revenue, other revenue, and income tax expense), including accelerated depreciation of certain coal-fueled units and Oregon's share of certain retired wind equipment as a result the 2020 Oregon RAC settlement, partially offset by the impacts of the depreciation study for which rates became effective January 1, 2021 of approximately $158 million and higher plant in-service balances.

Property and other taxes increased $4 million, or 2%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher property taxes in Oregon and Wyoming, partially offset by lower property taxes in Utah and Washington.

Interest expense increased $4 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher average long-term debt balances, partially offset by a lower weighted average long-term debt interest rate.

Allowance for borrowed and equity funds decreased $72 million, or 49%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower qualified construction work-in-progress balances.

Interest and dividend income increased $14 million, or 140%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher carrying charges on DSM regulatory assets in the current year.

186


Income tax benefit increased $4 million, or 5% for 2021 compared to 2020. The effective tax rate was (10)% and (11)% for 2021 and 2020, respectively. The effective tax rate increased primarily as a result of lower effects of ratemaking associated with excess deferred income tax amortization, offset by increased PTCs from PacifiCorp's new wind-powered generating facilities in the current year. In 2020, $118 million of excess deferred income taxes was amortized pursuant to regulatory orders from Utah, Oregon and Idaho, whereby portions of excess deferred income taxes were used to accelerate depreciation of certain coal-fueled units and Oregon's share of certain retired wind equipment or offset other regulatory balances for these jurisdictions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp's total net liquidity was as follows (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents$641 
Credit facility(1)
1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(249)
Net credit facility951 
Total net liquidity$1,592 
Credit facility:
Maturity date2025

(1)Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and "Credit Facilities" below for further discussion regarding PacifiCorp's credit facilities.

Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $1.82 billion and $1.80 billion, respectively. The increase is primarily due to higher collections from retail customers, collateral received from counterparties, transmission deposits and cash received for income taxes, partially offset by higher fuel, wholesale and material and supplies purchases.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. The increase is primarily due to higher cash received for income taxes and higher collections from retail customers, partially offset by higher wholesale purchases and timing of operating payables.

The timing of PacifiCorp's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $(2.2) billion and $(1.5) billion, respectively. The increase in net cash outflows from investing activities is mainly due to an increase in capital expenditures of $653 million.

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $(1.5) billion and $(2.5) billion, respectively. The decrease in net cash outflows from investing activities is mainly due to a decrease in capital expenditures of $1.0 billion.

187


Financing Activities

Short-term Debt

As of December 31, 2022, regulatory authorities limited PacifiCorp to $1.5 billion of short-term debt. In January 2023, updated regulatory authorization provided PacifiCorp with an increased limit to $2.0 billion of short-term debt. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had no short-term debt outstanding. For further discussion, refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Long-term Debt

In December 2022, PacifiCorp issued $1.1 billion of its 5.350% First Mortgage Bonds due December 2053. PacifiCorp intends within 24 months of the issuance date to allocate an amount equal to the net proceeds to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, new or existing investments or expenditures made in one or more eligible projects in alignment with BHE's Green Financing Framework. Proceeds will not knowingly be allocated to the same portion of a project that received allocation of proceeds under any other Green Financing Instrument; activities related to the exploration, production, transportation, or consumption of fossil fuels; or activities related to nuclear energy.

PacifiCorp made repayments on long-term debt totaling $155 million and $870 million during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

PacifiCorp's Mortgage and Deed of Trust creates a lien on most of PacifiCorp's electric utility property, allowing the issuance of bonds based on a percentage of utility property additions, bond credits arising from retirement of previously outstanding bonds or deposits of cash. The amount of bonds that PacifiCorp may issue generally is also subject to a net earnings test. As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp estimated it would be able to issue up to $8.5 billion of new first mortgage bonds under the most restrictive issuance test in the mortgage. Any issuances are subject to market conditions and amounts are further limited by regulatory authorizations or commitments or by covenants and tests contained in other financing agreements. PacifiCorp also has the ability to release property from the lien of the mortgage on the basis of property additions, bond credits or deposits of cash.

Credit Facilities

In June 2022, PacifiCorp amended and restated its existing $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2024. The amendment extended the expiration date to June 2025 and amended pricing from the London Interbank Offered Rate to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp entered into an additional $800 million 364-day unsecured credit facility expiring in January 2024.

Debt Authorizations

PacifiCorp currently has regulatory authority from the OPUC and the IPUC to issue an additional $900 million of long-term debt. PacifiCorp must make a notice filing with the WUTC prior to any future issuance. PacifiCorp currently has an effective shelf registration statement with the SEC to issue an indeterminate amount of first mortgage bonds through September 2023.

Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had non-redeemable preferred stock outstanding with an aggregate stated value of $2 million.

Common Shareholder's Equity

In 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp declared and paid dividends of $100 million and $150 million, respectively, to PPW Holdings LLC.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp declared dividends of $300 million payable to PPW Holdings LLC in February 2023.

188


Capitalization

PacifiCorp manages its capitalization and liquidity position to maintain a prudent capital structure with the objective of retaining strong investment grade credit ratings, which is expected to facilitate continuing access to flexible borrowing arrangements at favorable costs and rates. This objective, subject to periodic review and revision, attempts to balance the interests of all shareholders, customers and creditors and provide a competitive cost of capital and predictable capital market access.

Under existing or prospective authoritative accounting guidance, such as guidance pertaining to consolidations and leases, it is possible that new purchase power and gas agreements, transmission arrangements or amendments to existing arrangements may be accounted for as lease obligations on PacifiCorp's financial statements. While PacifiCorp has successfully amended covenants in financing arrangements that may be impacted, it may be more difficult for PacifiCorp to comply with its capitalization targets or regulatory commitments concerning minimum levels of common equity as a percentage of capitalization. This may lead PacifiCorp to seek amendments or waivers under financing agreements and from regulators, delay or reduce dividends or spending programs, seek additional new equity contributions from its indirect parent company, BHE, or take other actions.

Future Uses of Cash

PacifiCorp has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the issuance of commercial paper, the use of unsecured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which PacifiCorp has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including PacifiCorp's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with PacifiCorp and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.

Capital Expenditures

PacifiCorp has significant future capital requirements. Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, impacts to customer rates; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; outcomes of regulatory proceedings, including regulatory filings for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; new customer requests; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital.

Historical and forecast capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Wind generation$1,278 $131 $37 $797 $422 $302 
Electric distribution603 608 678 658 536 894 
Electric transmission415 325 1,208 1,431 1,120 1,586 
Solar generation— — — 24 93 286 
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage— 32 105 361 
Other244 444 235 637 793 557 
Total$2,540 $1,513 $2,166 $3,579 $3,069 $3,986 

189


PacifiCorp's 2021 IRP identified a roadmap for a significant increase in renewable and carbon free generation resources, coal-to-natural gas conversion of certain coal-fueled units, energy storage and associated transmission. PacifiCorp's 2021 IRP identified over 1,800 MWs of new wind-powered generation, over 2,100 MWs of new solar-powered generation and nearly 700 MWs of new battery storage capacity that are expected to be online by 2025. PacifiCorp anticipates that the additional new wind-powered generation will be a mixture of owned and contracted resources. PacifiCorp has included an estimate for these new generation resources and associated transmission in its forecast capital expenditures for 2023 through 2025. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. PacifiCorp's historical and forecast capital expenditures include the following:

Wind generation includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Growth projects include construction of new wind-powered generating facilities and construction at existing wind-powered generating facility sites acquired from third parties totaling $23 million for 2022, $118 million for 2021 and $1,148 million for 2020. PacifiCorp placed in-service 516 MWs of new wind-powered generating facilities in 2021 and 674 MWs in 2020. Planned spending for the construction of additional new wind-powered generating facilities and those at acquired sites totals $771 million in 2023, $385 million in 2024 and $251 million in 2025 and is primarily for projects totaling approximately 683 MWs that are expected to be placed in-service in 2023 through 2025.
Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Operating expenditures includes spend on wildfire mitigation. Expenditures for these items totaled $135 million in 2022, $54 million in 2021 and $28 million in 2020, and planned spending totals $90 million in 2023, $124 million in 2024 and $127 million in 2025. The remaining investments primarily relate to expenditures for new connections and distribution operations.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Transmission growth investments primarily reflects costs associated with Energy Gateway Transmission projects. Expenditures for these projects totaled $944 million for 2022, $94 million for 2021 and $56 million for 2020. Forecast expenditures for Energy Gateway projects include planned costs for the following Energy Gateway Transmission segments:
416-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Aeolus substation near Medicine Bow, Wyoming and the Clover substation near Mona, Utah;
59-mile, 230-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Windstar substation near Glenrock, Wyoming and the Aeolus substation;
290-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line from the Longhorn substation near Boardman, Oregon to the Hemingway substation near Boise, Idaho;
14-mile, 345-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Oquirrh substation in the Salt Lake Valley and the Terminal substation near the Salt Lake City Airport;
40-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Limber substation in central Utah and the Terminal substation; and
195-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Anticline substation near Point of Rocks, Wyoming and the Populus substation in Downey, Idaho.
Planned spending for these Energy Gateway Transmission segments that are expected to be placed in-service in 2024 through 2028 totals $1,005 million in 2023, $661 million in 2024 and $763 million in 2025. The remaining investments primarily relate to expenditures for transmission operations, including wildfire mitigation, generation interconnection requests and other Energy Gateway Transmission segments.
Solar generation includes growth projects. Planned spending for the construction of new solar projects will add approximately 377 MWs of new generation and are expected to be placed in-service in 2026.
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage includes growth projects. Planned spending for the construction of storage projects from 2023 through 2025 includes $319 million for battery storage projects providing approximately 419 MWs of storage that are expected to be placed in-service in 2026 and $79 million for the construction of 38 MWs of new pumped hydro storage on the North Umpqua River system expected to be placed in-service in 2024 and 2026. The remaining investments relate to planned spending on projects that are expected to be placed in-service beyond 2026.
Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Expenditures for information technology totaled $155 million in 2022, $108 million in 2021 and $75 million for 2020. Planned information technology spending totals $224 million in 2023, $181 million in 2024 and $232 million in 2025. The remaining investments relate to operating projects that consist of routine expenditures for generation and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.
190



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

From time to time, PacifiCorp enters into arrangements in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties that involve guarantees or similar arrangements. PacifiCorp currently has indemnification obligations in connection with the sale or transfer of certain assets. In addition, PacifiCorp evaluates potential obligations that arise out of variable interests in unconsolidated entities, determined in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. PacifiCorp believes that the likelihood that it would be required to perform or otherwise incur any significant losses associated with any of these obligations is remote. Refer to Notes 11 and 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information on these obligations and arrangements.

Material Cash Requirements

PacifiCorp has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise primarily from long-term debt (refer to Note 8), certain commitments and contingencies (refer to Note 14), cost of removal and AROs (refer to Notes 6 and 11). Refer to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

PacifiCorp has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $8.0 billion on long-term debt, including $449 million due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters

PacifiCorp is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding PacifiCorp's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

PacifiCorp is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, water quality, emissions performance standards, coal ash disposal, wildfire prevention and mitigation and other joint participants,environmental matters that have the potential to impact PacifiCorp's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. PacifiCorp believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and PacifiCorp is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt and preferred securities of PacifiCorp are rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of PacifiCorp's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt or preferred securities. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time. As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

PacifiCorp has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. PacifiCorp's unsecured revolving credit facilities do not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level to draw upon their availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facilities are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities. Certain authorizations or exemptions by regulatory commissions for the issuance of securities are valid as long as PacifiCorp maintains investment grade ratings on senior secured debt. A downgrade below that level would necessitate new regulatory applications and approvals.

191


In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in PacifiCorp's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp would have been required to post $433 million of additional collateral. PacifiCorp's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, outstanding accounts payable and receivable or other factors. Refer to Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of PacifiCorp's collateral requirements specific to PacifiCorp's derivative contracts.

Inflation

PacifiCorp operates under a cost-of-service based rate-setting structure administered by various state commissions and the FERC. Under this rate-setting structure, PacifiCorp is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation. PacifiCorp seeks to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of energy and other cost adjustment clauses and tariff riders, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and entering into contracts with fixed pricing where possible by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by PacifiCorp's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with PacifiCorp's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

PacifiCorp prepares its financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, PacifiCorp defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in rates occur.

PacifiCorp continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit PacifiCorp's ability to recover its costs. PacifiCorp believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $1.9 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's regulatory assets and liabilities.

192


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

PacifiCorp sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans as described in Note 10. PacifiCorp recognizes the funded status of these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Funded status is the fair value of plan assets minus the benefit obligation as of the measurement date. As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp recognized a net asset totaling $57 million for the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As of December 31, 2022, amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost included in net regulatory assets and accumulated other comprehensive loss totaled $255 million and $12 million, respectively.

The expense and benefit obligations relating to these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are based on actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. These key assumptions are reviewed annually and modified as appropriate. PacifiCorp believes that the key assumptions utilized in recording obligations under the plans are reasonable based on prior plan experience and current market and economic conditions. Refer to Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosures about PacifiCorp's defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the key assumptions used to calculate the funded status and net periodic benefit cost for these plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022.

PacifiCorp chooses a discount rate based upon high quality debt security investment yields in effect as of the measurement date with cash flows aligning to the expected timing and amount of plan liabilities.

In establishing its assumption as to the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, PacifiCorp evaluates the investment allocation between return-seeking investment and fixed income securities based on the funded status of the plan and utilizes the asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on forward-looking views of the financial markets and historical performance. Pension and other postretirement benefits expense increases as the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets decreases. PacifiCorp regularly reviews its actual asset allocations and rebalances its investments to its targeted allocations when considered appropriate.

The key assumptions used may differ materially from period to period due to changing market and economic conditions. These differences may result in a significant impact to pension and other postretirement benefits expense and funded status. If changes were to occur for the following key assumptions, the approximate effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements would be as follows (in millions):
Other Postretirement
Pension PlansBenefit Plan
+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%
Effect on December 31, 2022 Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate$(25)$26 $(8)$
Effect on 2022 Periodic Cost:
Discount rate$$(1)$$(1)
Expected rate of return on plan assets(5)(2)

A variety of factors affect the funded status of the plans, including asset returns, discount rates, mortality assumptions, plan changes and PacifiCorp's funding policy for each plan.

193


Income Taxes

In determining PacifiCorp's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by PacifiCorp's various regulatory commissions. PacifiCorp's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. PacifiCorp recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of PacifiCorp's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, PacifiCorp believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results. Refer to Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's income taxes.

It is probable that PacifiCorp will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to customers in certain state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $1.2 billion and will primarily be included in regulated rates over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.

Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue

Revenue is recognized as electricity is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $301 million as of December 31, 2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month and actual revenue is recorded based on subsequent meter readings.

Wildfire Loss Contingencies

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, PacifiCorp is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the wildfires. In determining this exposure, PacifiCorp is required to assess whether the likelihood of loss for each of the wildfires and lawsuits is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with various parties. If deemed reasonably possible, PacifiCorp is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts. If deemed probable, PacifiCorp is required to accrue a loss if reasonably estimable based on the bottom end of the range if no amount within the range of estimated loss is any better than another amount. Many assumptions and variables are involved in determining these estimates, including identifying the various categories of potential loss such as fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. Within the categories of potential loss, further assumptions are made regarding items such as the types of structures damaged, estimated replacement values associated with those structures, value of personal property, the types of natural resource damage such as timber, the value of that timber, the nature of noneconomic damages such as those arising from personal injuries, other damages PacifiCorp may be obligatedresponsible for if found negligent such as punitive damages, and the amount of any penalties or fines that may be imposed by governmental entities. Refer to absorb, directly or by payingNote 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional sumsinformation regarding PacifiCorp's loss contingencies associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney fire.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

PacifiCorp's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. PacifiCorp's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which PacifiCorp transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with PacifiCorp's business activities. PacifiCorp has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Notes 2 and 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's contracts accounted for as derivatives.
194



PacifiCorp has a risk management committee that is responsible for the oversight of market and credit risk relating to the entity,commodity transactions of PacifiCorp. To limit PacifiCorp's exposure to market and credit risk, the risk management committee recommends, and executive management establishes, policies, limits and approved products, which are reviewed frequently to respond to changing market conditions.

Risk is an inherent part of PacifiCorp's business and activities. PacifiCorp has established a proportionate sharerisk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the defaulting party's liability.various types of risk involved in PacifiCorp's estimated share ofbusiness. The risk management policy governs energy transactions and is designed for hedging PacifiCorp's existing energy and asset exposures, and to a limited extent, the decommissioningpolicy permits arbitrage and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities.


(11)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

PacifiCorp is exposedtrading activities to the impacttake advantage of market fluctuations in commodity pricesinefficiencies. The policy also governs the types of transactions authorized for use and interest rates. establishes guidelines for credit risk management and management information systems required to effectively monitor such transactions. PacifiCorp's risk management policy provides for the use of only those contracts that have a similar volume or price relationship to its portfolio of assets, liabilities or anticipated transactions.

Commodity Price Risk

PacifiCorp is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk as itPacifiCorp has an obligation to serve retail customer load in its service territories. PacifiCorp's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. PacifiCorp does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities.

PacifiCorp has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, monitor and report, each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, PacifiCorp uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. PacifiCorp does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. PacifiCorp's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in rates, which is subject to regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.
PacifiCorp measures, monitors and manages the market risk in its electricity and natural gas portfolio in comparison to established thresholds and measures its open positions subject to price risk in terms of quantity at each delivery location for each forward time period. PacifiCorp has a risk management policy that requires increasing volumes of hedge transactions over a three-year position management and hedging horizon to reduce market risk of its electricity and natural gas portfolio.

PacifiCorp maintained compliance with its risk management policy and limit procedures during the year ended December 31, 2022.

The table that follows summarizes PacifiCorp's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives, excluding collateral netting of $(78) million and $5 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions):
Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
 Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$270 $381 $159 
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$53 $104 $

195


PacifiCorp's commodity derivative contracts are generally recoverable from customers in rates; therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose PacifiCorp to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a regulatory liability of $270 million and $53 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative asset of $270 million and $53 million, respectively. Consolidated financial results would be negatively impacted if the costs of wholesale electricity, natural gas or fuel are higher or the level of wholesale electricity sales are lower than what is included in rates, including the impacts of adjustment mechanisms.

Interest Rate Risk

PacifiCorp is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. PacifiCorp manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, PacifiCorp's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose PacifiCorp to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if PacifiCorp may from timewere to timereacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. PacifiCorp has the ability to enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate PacifiCorp's exposure to interest rate risk. No interest rate derivatives were in place during the periods presented. PacifiCorp does not hedge allThe nature and amount of its commodity pricePacifiCorp's short- and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portionlong-term debt can be expected to changes invary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market prices.

There have been no significant changes in PacifiCorp's accounting policies related to derivatives.conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 27, 8 and 1213 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information on derivative contracts.

The following table, which reflects master netting arrangements and excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases or normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair valuediscussion of PacifiCorp's derivative contracts, on a gross basis,short- and reconciles those amountslong-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $218 million that expose PacifiCorp to the amounts presented on a net basis onrisk of increased interest expense in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

 Other   Other Other  
 Current Other Current Long-term  
 Assets Assets Liabilities Liabilities Total
          
As of December 31, 2017:         
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
         
Commodity assets$11
 $1
 $1
 $
 $13
Commodity liabilities(3) 
 (32) (82) (117)
Total8
 1
 (31) (82) (104)
          
Total derivatives8
 1
 (31) (82) (104)
Cash collateral receivable
 
 17
 57
 74
Total derivatives - net basis$8
 $1
 $(14) $(25) $(30)
          
As of December 31, 2016:         
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
         
Commodity assets$24
 $2
 $1
 $
 $27
Commodity liabilities(6) 
 (14) (84) (104)
Total18
 2
 (13) (84) (77)
          
Total derivatives18
 2
 (13) (84) (77)
Cash collateral receivable
 
 10
 59
 69
Total derivatives - net basis$18
 $2
 $(3) $(25) $(8)

(1)PacifiCorp's commodity derivatives are generally included in rates and as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, a regulatory asset of $101 million and $73 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $104 million and $77 million, respectively.

event of increases in short-term interest rates. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances ofmarket risk related to PacifiCorp's regulatory assets and summarizes the pre-tax gains and losses on commodity derivative contracts recognized in regulatory assets, as well as amounts reclassified to earnings for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
      
Beginning balance$73
 $133
 $85
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory assets47
 (27) 82
Net gains reclassified to operating revenue9
 10
 40
Net losses reclassified to energy costs(28) (43) (74)
Ending balance$101
 $73
 $133

Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market valuesvariable-rate debt as of December 31, (in millions):2022 is not hedged. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on PacifiCorp's consolidated annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
 Unit of    
 Measure 2017 2016
      
Electricity (sales)Megawatt hours (9) (3)
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms 113
 84
Fuel oil purchasesGallons 
 11


Credit Risk


PacifiCorp is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent PacifiCorp's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, PacifiCorp analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, PacifiCorp enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, PacifiCorp exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.


Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale derivative contracts contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These derivative contracts may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" in the event of a material adverse change in PacifiCorp's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp's aggregate credit ratingsexposure with wholesale energy supply and marketing counterparties included counterparties having non-investment grade, internally rated credit ratings. Substantially all of these non-investment grade, internally rated counterparties are associated with long-duration solar and wind power purchase agreements, some of which are from facilities that have not yet achieved commercial operation and for which PacifiCorp has no obligation should the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.facilities not achieve commercial operation.


The aggregate fair value
196


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

197


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of PacifiCorp's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $110 millionDirectors and $97 millionShareholders of PacifiCorp

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PacifiCorp and subsidiaries ("PacifiCorp") as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows, for which PacifiCorp had posted collateraleach of $74 million and $69 million, respectively,the three years in the formperiod ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of cash deposits. If all credit-risk-related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggeredPacifiCorp as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, PacifiCorp would have been2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of PacifiCorp's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on PacifiCorp's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to post $34be independent with respect to PacifiCorp in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. PacifiCorp is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of PacifiCorp's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

PacifiCorp is subject to rate regulation by state public service commissions as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where PacifiCorp operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

198


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow PacifiCorp an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While PacifiCorp has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit PacifiCorp's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, and (3) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated PacifiCorp's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected PacifiCorp's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.

Wildfires – Contingencies – Refer to Note 14 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, PacifiCorp is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire (the "Wildfires"). In determining this exposure, PacifiCorp is required to determine whether the likelihood of loss for each of the Wildfires is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the Wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with claimants.

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If deemed reasonably possible, PacifiCorp is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts.

Management has recorded estimated liabilities of $424 million and $22receivables of $246 million, respectively,which represent its best estimate of additional collateral. PacifiCorp's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation or other factors.probable losses and expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, PacifiCorp recognized probable losses net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively. Management has disclosed reasonably possible estimated losses of $31 million, net of potential insurance recoveries of $103 million, associated with the 2022 McKinney Fire.


(12)
Fair Value Measurements


The carrying value of PacifiCorp's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities
199


We identified wildfire-related contingencies and short-term borrowings approximates fair valuethe related disclosures as a critical audit matter because of the short-term maturitysignificant judgments made by management to determine the probability of loss and estimate the probable or reasonably possible losses and insurance recoveries. This required the application of a high degree of judgment and extensive effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's judgments, estimates and disclosures related to wildfire-related loss contingencies.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management's judgments regarding the probability of loss, estimated losses and insurance recoveries, and related disclosures for wildfire-related contingencies included the following, among others:
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether a loss was probable or reasonably possible for the Wildfires by inquiring of management and PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding the likelihood and amounts of probable and reasonably possible losses, including the potential impact of information gained through investigations into the cause of the fires, information from claimants, the advice of legal counsel, and reading external information for any evidence that might contradict management's assertions.
We evaluated the estimation methodology for determining the amount of probable and reasonably possible losses through inquiries with management and external and internal legal counsel, and we tested the significant assumptions used in the estimates of probable and reasonably possible losses.
We read legal letters from PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding known information and evaluated whether the information therein was consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether related insurance recoveries were probable of collection by inquiring of management and PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding the amounts of insurance recoveries recorded or disclosed. With the assistance of our insurance specialists, we tested the significant assumptions used in the determination of collectability, including obtaining and reading related policies to determine whether the types of insurance claims are included or excluded from coverage.
We evaluated whether PacifiCorp's disclosures were appropriate and consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Portland, Oregon
February 24, 2023

We have served as PacifiCorp's auditor since 2006.

200


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$641 $179 
Trade receivables, net825 725 
Other receivables, net72 52 
Inventories474 474 
Derivative contracts184 76 
Regulatory assets275 65 
Other current assets213 150 
Total current assets2,684 1,721 
Property, plant and equipment, net24,430 22,914 
Regulatory assets1,605 1,287 
Other assets686 534 
Total assets$29,405 $26,456 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these instruments. consolidated financial statements.


201


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$1,049 $680 
Accrued interest128 121 
Accrued property, income and other taxes67 78 
Accrued employee expenses86 89 
Current portion of long-term debt449 155 
Regulatory liabilities96 118 
Other current liabilities271 219 
Total current liabilities2,146 1,460 
Long-term debt9,217 8,575 
Regulatory liabilities2,843 2,650 
Deferred income taxes3,152 2,847 
Other long-term liabilities1,306 1,011 
Total liabilities18,664 16,543 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock
Common stock - 750 shares authorized, no par value, 357 shares issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital4,479 4,479 
Retained earnings6,269 5,449 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(9)(17)
Total shareholders' equity10,741 9,913 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$29,405 $26,456 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

202


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $5,341 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 1,790 
Operations and maintenance1,227 1,031 1,209 
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 1,209 
Property and other taxes195 213 209 
Total operating expenses4,521 4,163 4,417 
Operating income1,158 1,133 924 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(431)(430)(426)
Allowance for borrowed funds31 24 48 
Allowance for equity funds71 50 98 
Interest and dividend income44 24 10 
Other, net(15)10 
Total other income (expense)(300)(324)(260)
Income before income tax benefit858 809 664 
Income tax benefit(62)(79)(75)
Net income$920 $888 $739 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

203


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income$920 $888 $739 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax —
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $3, $1 and $(1)(3)
Comprehensive income$928 $890 $736 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

204


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)
Accumulated
AdditionalOtherTotal
PreferredCommonPaid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholders'
StockStockCapitalEarningsLoss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 2019$$— $4,479 $3,972 $(16)$8,437 
Net income— — — 739 — 739 
Other comprehensive loss— — — — (3)(3)
Balance, December 31, 2020— 4,479 4,711 (19)9,173 
Net income— — — 888 — 888 
Other comprehensive income— — — — 
Common stock dividends declared— — — (150)— (150)
Balance, December 31, 2021— 4,479 5,449 (17)9,913 
Net income— — — 920 — 920 
Other comprehensive income— — — — 
Common stock dividends declared— — — (100)— (100)
Balance, December 31, 2022$$— $4,479 $6,269 $(9)$10,741 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

205


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$920 $888 $739 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 1,209 
Allowance for equity funds(71)(50)(98)
Net power cost deferrals(482)(159)(1)
Amortization of net power cost deferrals100 67 50 
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(162)(97)(278)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits157 64 (124)
Other, net13 (5)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables, other receivables and other assets(264)17 (169)
Inventories— (88)
Derivative collateral, net95 19 23 
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net(46)(37)(53)
Accounts payable and other liabilities439 372 
Net cash flows from operating activities1,819 1,804 1,583 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(2,166)(1,513)(2,540)
Other, net12 30 
Net cash flows from investing activities(2,161)(1,501)(2,510)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt1,087 984 987 
Repayments of long-term debt(155)(870)(38)
(Repayments of) net proceeds from short-term debt— (93)(37)
Dividends paid(100)(150)— 
Other, net(2)(7)(2)
Net cash flows from financing activities830 (136)910 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents488 167 (17)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period186 19 36 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$674 $186 $19 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

206


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)Organization and Operations

PacifiCorp, which includes PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries, is a U.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial, industrial, irrigation and other customers in portions of Utah, Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, Idaho and California. PacifiCorp owns, or has variousinterests in, a number of thermal, hydroelectric, wind-powered and geothermal generating facilities, as well as electric transmission and distribution assets. PacifiCorp also buys and sells electricity on the wholesale market with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. PacifiCorp is subject to comprehensive state and federal regulation. PacifiCorp's subsidiaries support its electric utility operations by providing coal mining services. PacifiCorp is an indirect subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"), a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").

(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, that are measured at fair value onincluding derivative contracts; and accounting for loss contingencies and applicable insurance recoveries, including those related to the Oregon and Northern California 2020 wildfires (the "2020 Wildfires") and the 2022 McKinney fire described in Note 14. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:Statements.


Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that PacifiCorp has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observableAccounting for the assetEffects of Certain Types of Regulation

PacifiCorp prepares its financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, PacifiCorp defers the recognition of certain costs or liability and inputsincome if it is probable that, are derived principally fromthrough the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect PacifiCorp's judgments about the assumptions market participants would usedecrease in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. PacifiCorp develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

The following table presents PacifiCorp'sfuture rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in rates occur.

If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

207


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist substantially of funds representing vendor retention, custodial and nuclear decommissioning funds. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured(in millions):
As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$641 $179 
Restricted cash included in other current assets
Restricted cash included in other assets26 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$674 $186 

Investments

Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with realized gains and losses, as determined on a recurringspecific identification basis, recognized in earnings and unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI, net of tax. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had no unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities. Trading securities are carried at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings.

Equity Method Investments

PacifiCorp utilizes the equity method of accounting with respect to investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when an investor possesses more than 20% of the voting interests of the investee. This presumption may be overcome based on specific facts and circumstances that demonstrate that the ability to exercise significant influence is restricted. In applying the equity method, PacifiCorp records the investment at cost and subsequently increases or decreases the carrying value of the investment by PacifiCorp's proportionate share of the net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI") of the investee. PacifiCorp records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination, and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on PacifiCorp's assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to PacifiCorp by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, PacifiCorp primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, PacifiCorp may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. The change in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$18 $17 $
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net18 13 18 
Write-offs, net(17)(12)(9)
Ending balance$19 $18 $17 

208


 Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements    
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Other(1)
 Total
As of December 31, 2017:         
Assets:         
Commodity derivatives$
 $13
 $
 $(4) $9
Money market mutual funds(2)
21
 
 
 
 21
Investment funds21
 
 
 
 21
 $42
 $13
 $
 $(4) $51
          
Liabilities - Commodity derivatives$
 $(117) $
 $78
 $(39)
          
As of December 31, 2016:         
Assets:         
Commodity derivatives$
 $27
 $
 $(7) $20
Money market mutual funds (2)
13
 
 
 
 13
Investment funds17
 
 
 
 17
 $30
 $27
 $
 $(7) $50
          
Liabilities - Commodity derivatives$
 $(104) $
 $76
 $(28)
Derivatives

(1)Represents netting under master netting arrangements and a net cash collateral receivable of $74 million and $69 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Amounts are included in cash and cash equivalents, other current assets and other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of these money market mutual funds approximates cost.


PacifiCorp employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage price risk for electricity, natural gas and other commodities and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.

Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked-to-market and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of fuel and energy on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For PacifiCorp's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in rates are recorded as regulatory liabilities or assets. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.

Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of materials, supplies and fuel stocks and are stated at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. PacifiCorp capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs, which include debt and equity allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"). The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed.

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed on the straight-line method based on composite asset class lives prescribed by PacifiCorp's various regulatory authorities or over the assets' estimated useful lives. Depreciation studies are completed periodically to determine the appropriate composite asset class lives, net salvage and depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the various regulatory authorities. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

Generally when PacifiCorp retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represents the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of property, plant and equipment, is capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, PacifiCorp is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.

209


Asset Retirement Obligations

PacifiCorp recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. PacifiCorp's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.

Impairment

PacifiCorp evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Substantially all property, plant and equipment supports PacifiCorp's regulated operations, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

Leases

PacifiCorp has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for land, office space, office equipment, and generating facilities and finance leases consisting primarily of office buildings, natural gas pipeline facilities, and generating facilities. These leases generally require PacifiCorp to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. PacifiCorp does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating PacifiCorp is reasonably certain to exercise the option. PacifiCorp's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Right-of-use assets will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

PacifiCorp's leases of generating facilities generally are in the form of long-term purchases of electricity, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

PacifiCorp's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

PacifiCorp uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which PacifiCorp expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. PacifiCorp records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Substantially all of PacifiCorp's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission and distribution and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging."
210


Revenue recognized is equal to what PacifiCorp has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of PacifiCorp's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $301 million and $264 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued.

Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Debt Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes

Berkshire Hathaway includes PacifiCorp in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, PacifiCorp's provision for income taxes has been computed on a stand-alone basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of OCI are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that PacifiCorp deems probable to be passed on to its customers in most state jurisdictions are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse or as otherwise approved by PacifiCorp's various regulatory commissions. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties or as prescribed by various regulatory commissions.

PacifiCorp recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. PacifiCorp's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Segment Information

PacifiCorp currently has one segment, which includes its regulated electric utility operations.

211


(3)Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility Plant:
Generation15 - 59 years$13,726 $13,679 
Transmission60 - 90 years8,051 7,894 
Distribution20 - 75 years8,477 8,044 
Intangible plant(1) and other
5 - 75 years2,755 2,645 
Utility plant in-service33,009 32,262 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(11,093)(10,507)
Utility plant in-service, net21,916 21,755 
Nonregulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization14 - 95 years18 18 
21,934 21,773 
Construction work-in-progress2,496 1,141 
Property, plant and equipment, net$24,430 $22,914 

(1)Computer software costs included in intangible plant are initially assigned a depreciable life of 5 to 10 years.

The average depreciation and amortization rate applied to depreciable property, plant and equipment was 3.5%, 3.5% and 4.1% for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Unallocated Acquisition Adjustments

PacifiCorp has unallocated acquisition adjustments that represent the excess of costs of the acquired interests in property, plant and equipment purchased from the entity that first dedicated the assets to utility service over their net book value in those assets. These unallocated acquisition adjustments included in other property, plant and equipment had an original cost of $156 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and accumulated depreciation of $144 million and $143 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

(4)Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements with other utilities, PacifiCorp, as a tenant in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation, transmission and distribution facilities. PacifiCorp accounts for its proportionate share of each facility, and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include PacifiCorp's share of the expenses of these facilities.

212


The amounts shown in the table below represent PacifiCorp's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):
FacilityAccumulatedConstruction
PacifiCorpinDepreciation andWork-in-
ShareServiceAmortizationProgress
Jim Bridger Nos. 1 - 467 %$1,529 $914 $39 
Hunter No. 194 517 227 
Hunter No. 260 305 148 
Wyodak80 491 273 
Colstrip Nos. 3 and 410 262 178 — 
Hermiston50 189 106 — 
Craig Nos. 1 and 219 372 331 — 
Hayden No. 125 77 52 — 
Hayden No. 213 44 31 — 
Transmission and distribution facilitiesVarious916 274 129 
Total$4,702 $2,534 $178 

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$11 $11 
Finance leases11 
Total right-of-use assets$20 $22 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$11 $11 
Finance leases11 12 
Total lease liabilities$22 $23 

213


The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Variable$61 $56 $60 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization
Interest
Short-term
Total lease costs$71 $69 $68 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases11.412.713.9
Finance leases9.710.18.4
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases3.9 %3.7 %3.8 %
Finance leases11.4 %11.1 %10.5 %

Cash payments associated with operating and finance lease liabilities approximated lease cost for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

PacifiCorp has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$$
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter13 
Total undiscounted lease payments14 18 32 
Less - amounts representing interest(3)(7)(10)
Lease liabilities$11 $11 $22 

214


(6)Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. PacifiCorp's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life20222021
Employee benefit plans(1)
16 years$290 $286 
Utah mine disposition(2)
Various115 116 
Unamortized contract values1 year18 36 
Deferred net power costs2 years546 151 
Environmental costs30 years111 108 
Asset retirement obligation29 years275 241 
Demand side management (DSM)10 years224 211 
Wildfire mitigation and vegetation management costsVarious111 21 
OtherVarious190 182 
Total regulatory assets$1,880 $1,352 
Reflected as:
Current assets$275 $65 
Noncurrent assets1,605 1,287 
Total regulatory assets$1,880 $1,352 

(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in rates when recognized.
(2)Amounts represent regulatory assets established as a result of the Utah mine disposition in 2015 for the United Mine Workers of America ("UMWA") 1974 Pension Plan withdrawal and closure costs incurred to date considered probable of recovery.

PacifiCorp had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $1,200 million and $723 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

215


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent income to be recognized or amounts to be returned to customers in future periods. PacifiCorp's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life20222021
Cost of removal(1)
26 years$1,332 $1,187 
Deferred income taxes(2)
Various1,164 1,307 
Unrealized gain on regulated derivatives1 year270 53 
OtherVarious173 221 
Total regulatory liabilities$2,939 $2,768 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$96 $118 
Noncurrent liabilities2,843 2,650 
Total regulatory liabilities$2,939 $2,768 

(1)Amounts represent estimated costs, as generally accrued through depreciation rates, of removing property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.
(2)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable of being passed on to customers, partially offset by income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's availability under its unsecured credit facility as of December 31 (in millions):
2022:
Credit facility$1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(249)
Net credit facility$951 
2021:
Credit facility$1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support(218)
Net credit facility$982 

As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp was in compliance with the covenants of its credit facility and letter of credit arrangements.

PacifiCorp has a $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which supports PacifiCorp's commercial paper program and certain series of its tax-exempt bond obligations and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at PacifiCorp's option, plus a spread that varies based on PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp did not have any commercial paper borrowings outstanding.

216


The credit facility requires that PacifiCorp's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp entered into an additional $800 million 364-day unsecured credit facility expiring in January 2024. No amounts are currently outstanding against this new credit facility.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had $38 million and $19 million, respectively, of fully available letters of credit issued under committed arrangements outside of its credit facility in support of certain transactions required by third parties that generally have provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration dates for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

(8)Long-term Debt

PacifiCorp's long-term debt was as follows as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
20222021
AverageAverage
PrincipalCarryingInterestCarryingInterest
AmountValueRateValueRate
First mortgage bonds:
2.95% to 8.23%, due through 2026$1,224 $1,223 4.07 %$1,377 4.41 %
2.70% to 7.70%, due 2029 to 20311,100 1,095 4.35 1,094 4.35 
5.25% to 6.25%, due 2034 to 20372,050 2,042 5.90 2,042 5.90 
4.10% to 6.35%, due 2038 to 20421,250 1,239 5.63 1,238 5.63 
2.90% to 5.35%, due 2049 to 20533,900 3,849 4.03 2,761 3.52 
Variable-rate series, tax-exempt bond obligations (2022-3.75% to 4.10%; 2021-0.12% to 0.14%):
Due 202525 25 4.10 25 0.12 
Due 2024 to 2025(1)
193 193 3.81 193 0.13 
Total long-term debt$9,742 $9,666 $8,730 
Reflected as:
20222021
Current portion of long-term debt$449 $155 
Long-term debt9,217 8,575 
Total long-term debt$9,666 $8,730 

(1)Secured by pledged first mortgage bonds registered to and held by the tax-exempt bond trustee generally with the same interest rates, maturity dates and redemption provisions as the tax-exempt bond obligations.

In December 2022, PacifiCorp issued $1.1 billion of its 5.35% First Mortgage Bonds due December 2053. PacifiCorp intends within 24 months of the issuance date to allocate an amount equal to the net proceeds to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, new or existing investments or expenditures made in one or more eligible projects in alignment with BHE's Green Financing Framework. Proceeds will not knowingly be allocated to the same portion of a project that received allocation of proceeds under any other Green Financing Instrument; activities related to the exploration, production, transportation, or consumption of fossil fuels; or activities related to nuclear energy.

PacifiCorp's long-term debt generally includes provisions that allow PacifiCorp to redeem the first mortgage bonds in whole or in part at any time through the payment of a make-whole premium. Variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations are generally redeemable at par value.

217


PacifiCorp currently has regulatory authority from the Oregon Public Utility Commission and the Idaho Public Utilities Commission to issue an additional $900 million of long-term debt. PacifiCorp must make a notice filing with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission prior to any future issuance. PacifiCorp currently has an effective shelf registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to issue an indeterminate amount of first mortgage bonds through September 2023.

The issuance of PacifiCorp's first mortgage bonds is limited by available property, earnings tests and other provisions of PacifiCorp's mortgage. Approximately $33 billion of PacifiCorp's eligible property (based on original cost) was subject to the lien of the mortgage as of December 31, 2022.

As of December 31, 2022, the annual principal maturities of long-term debt for 2023 and thereafter are as follows (in millions):
Long-term
Debt
2023$449 
2024591 
2025302 
2026100 
2027— 
Thereafter8,300 
Total9,742 
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs(76)
Total$9,666 

(9)Income Taxes

Income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
2022 20212020
Current:
Federal$(216)$(150)$19 
State(3)30 
Total(219)(143)49 
Deferred:
Federal90 26 (124)
State71 40 
Total161 66 (123)
Investment tax credits(4)(2)(1)
Total income tax (benefit) expense$(62)$(79)$(75)

218


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
Effects of ratemaking(12)(14)(22)
Federal income tax credits(22)(20)(13)
Valuation allowance— — 
Other— — 
Effective income tax rate(7)%(10)%(11)%

Income tax credits relate primarily to production tax credits ("PTC") earned by PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities. Federal renewable electricity PTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-powered generating facilities is produced and sold and are based on a per-kilowatt hour rate pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law. Wind-powered generating facilities are eligible for the credits for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in-service. PTCs for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 totaled $185 million, $164 million and $89 million, respectively.

Effects of ratemaking is primarily attributable to activity associated with excess deferred income taxes. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $102 million for 2022. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $112 million for 2021, including the use of $4 million to amortize certain regulatory balances in Wyoming and Idaho. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $132 million for 2020, including the use of $118 million to accelerate depreciation of certain retired equipment and to amortize certain regulatory balances in Idaho, Oregon and Utah.

The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Deferred income tax assets:
Regulatory liabilities$724 $682 
Employee benefits59 68 
State carryforwards73 73 
Loss contingencies107 63 
Asset retirement obligations79 73 
Other80 88 
  Total deferred income tax assets1,122 1,047 
Valuation allowances(35)(15)
Total deferred income tax assets, net1,087 1,032 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment(3,612)(3,468)
Regulatory assets(462)(332)
Other(165)(79)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(4,239)(3,879)
Net deferred income tax liability$(3,152)$(2,847)

219


The following table provides, without regard to valuation allowances, PacifiCorp's net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and expiration dates as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
State
Net operating loss carryforwards$1,159 
Deferred income taxes on net operating loss carryforwards$53 
Expiration dates2023 - indefinite
Tax credit carryforwards$20 
Expiration dates2023 - indefinite

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of PacifiCorp's income tax returns through December 31, 2013. The statute of limitations for PacifiCorp's income tax returns have expired for certain states through December 31, 2011, and for Idaho through December 31, 2018, except for the impact of any federal audit adjustments. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, for state filings may not preclude the state from adjusting the state net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans

PacifiCorp sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans that cover certain of its employees, as well as a defined contribution 401(k) employee savings plan ("401(k) Plan"). In addition, PacifiCorp contributes to a joint trustee pension plan and a subsidiary previously contributed to a multiemployer pension plan for benefits offered to certain bargaining units.

Defined Benefit Plans

PacifiCorp's pension plans include non-contributory defined benefit pension plans, collectively the PacifiCorp Retirement Plan ("Retirement Plan"), and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP"). The Retirement Plan is closed to all non-union employees hired after January 1, 2008. All non-union Retirement Plan participants hired prior to January 1, 2008 that did not elect to receive equivalent fixed contributions to the 401(k) Plan effective January 1, 2009 earned benefits based on a cash balance formula through December 31, 2016. Effective January 1, 2017, non-union employee participants with a cash balance benefit in the Retirement Plan are no longer eligible to receive pay credits in their cash balance formula. In general for union employees, benefits under the Retirement Plan were frozen at various dates from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2011 as they are now being provided with enhanced 401(k) Plan benefits. However, certain limited union Retirement Plan participants continue to earn benefits under the Retirement Plan based on the employee's years of service and a final average pay formula. The SERP was closed to new participants as of March 21, 2006 and froze future accruals for active participants as of December 31, 2014.

PacifiCorp's other postretirement benefit plan provides healthcare and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees.

Pension Settlement

Pension settlement accounting was triggered in 2022 and 2021 as a result of the amount of lump sum distributions in the Retirement Plan exceeding the service and interest cost threshold. The 2021 pension settlement accounting included an interim July 31, 2021 remeasurement of the pension plan assets and projected benefit obligation. As a result of the settlement accounting, PacifiCorp recognized settlement losses of $6 million, net of regulatory deferrals during each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

For purposes of calculating the expected return on plan assets, a market-related value is used. The market-related value of plan assets is calculated by spreading the difference between expected and actual investment returns over a five-year period beginning after the first year in which they occur.

220


Net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the plans included the following components for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Service cost$— $— $— $$$
Interest cost29 29 36 
Expected return on plan assets(42)(51)(56)(11)(9)(14)
Settlement(1)
— — — — 
Net amortization16 21 18 
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)$$$(2)$— $$— 

(1)Pension amounts represent settlement losses of $24 million and $15 million net of deferrals of $18 million and $9 million during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Funded Status

The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted pricesplan assets for identical contractsthe years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$1,058 $1,064 $324 $327 
Employer contributions(1)
— 
Participant contributions— — 
Actual (loss) return on plan assets(172)109 (42)14 
Settlement(2)
(67)(52)— — 
Benefits paid(65)(68)(23)(24)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$758 $1,058 $264 $324 

(1)Pension amounts represent employer contributions to the SERP.
(2)Benefits paid in the form of lump sum distributions that gave rise to the settlement accounting described above.

The following table is a reconciliation of the benefit obligations for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$1,048 $1,202 $288 $307 
Service cost— — 
Interest cost29 29 
Participant contributions— — 
Actuarial gain(199)(63)(61)(10)
Settlement(1)
(67)(52)— — 
Benefits paid(65)(68)(23)(24)
Benefit obligation, end of year$746 $1,048 $219 $288 
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$746 $1,048 

(1)Benefits paid in the form of lump sum distributions that gave rise to the settlement accounting described above.

221


The funded status of the plans and the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$758 $1,058 $264 $324 
Less - Benefit obligation, end of year746 1,048 219 288 
Funded status$12 $10 $45 $36 
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Other assets$53 $63 $45 $36 
Accrued employee expenses(4)(4)— — 
Other long-term liabilities(37)(49)— — 
Amounts recognized$12 $10 $45 $36 

The SERP has no plan assets; however, PacifiCorp has a Rabbi trust that holds corporate-owned life insurance and other investments to provide funding for the future cash requirements of the SERP. The cash surrender value of all of the policies included in the Rabbi trust, net of amounts borrowed against the cash surrender value, plus the fair market in which PacifiCorp transacts. When quoted prices for identical contractsvalue of other Rabbi trust investments, was $61 million and $69 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. These assets are not available, PacifiCorp uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent PacifiCorp's estimatesincluded in the plan assets in the above table, but are reflected in noncurrent other assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, on the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. PacifiCorp bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations, when available, or internally developedConsolidated Balance Sheets. The projected and commercial models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations are obtained from independent energy brokers, exchanges, direct communication with market participants and actual transactions executed by PacifiCorp. Market price quotations for certain major electricity and natural gas trading hubs are generally readily obtainableaccumulated benefit obligations for the first six years; therefore, PacifiCorp's forward price curves for those locationsSERP were $42 million and periods reflect observable market quotes. Market price quotations for other electricity$54 million at December 31, 2022 and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable for2021, respectively.

As of December 31, 2022, the first six years. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, as well as for those contracts that are not actively traded, PacifiCorp uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contractsthe plan assets for the Retirement Plan was in excess of both the projected benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation.

Unrecognized Amounts

The portion of the funded status of the plans not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost as of December 31 is as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Net loss (gain)$273 $298 $(36)$(28)
Regulatory deferrals(1)
29 11 
Total$302 $309 $(35)$(26)

(1)Pension amounts represent the unamortized portion of deferred settlement losses.

222


A reconciliation of the amounts not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows (in millions):
Accumulated
Other
RegulatoryComprehensive
AssetLossTotal
Pension
Balance, December 31, 2020$432 $25 $457 
Net gain arising during the year(120)(1)(121)
Net amortization(20)(1)(21)
Settlement(6)— (6)
Total(146)(2)(148)
Balance, December 31, 2021286 23 309 
Net loss (gain) arising during the year24 (9)15 
Net amortization(14)(2)(16)
Settlement(6)— (6)
Total(11)(7)
Balance, December 31, 2022$290 $12 $302 

Regulatory
Liability
Other Postretirement
Balance, December 31, 2020$(10)
Net gain arising during the year(15)
Net amortization(1)
Total(16)
Balance, December 31, 2021(26)
Net gain arising during the year(8)
Net amortization(1)
Total(9)
Balance, December 31, 2022$(35)

223


Plan Assumptions

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Benefit obligations as of December 31:
Discount rate5.55 %2.90 %2.50 %5.50 %2.90 %2.50 %
Rate of compensation increaseN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan - non-union
2020N/AN/A2.27 %N/AN/AN/A
2021N/A0.82 %0.82 %N/AN/AN/A
20220.88 %0.88 %0.82 %N/AN/AN/A
20234.73 %0.88 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
20244.73 %1.90 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
2025 and beyond2.60 %1.90 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan - union
2020N/AN/A2.16 %N/AN/AN/A
2021N/A1.42 %1.42 %N/AN/AN/A
20221.94 %1.94 %1.42 %N/AN/AN/A
20233.55 %1.94 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
20243.55 %2.30 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
2025 and beyond2.40 %2.30 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Discount rate2.90 %2.50 %3.25 %2.90 %2.50 %3.20 %
Expected return on plan assets4.70 6.00 6.50 3.44 2.90 4.92 

In establishing its assumption as to the expected return on plan assets, PacifiCorp utilizes the asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets.

As a functionresult of a plan amendment effective on January 1, 2017, the benefit obligation for the Retirement Plan is no longer affected by future increases in compensation. As a result of a labor settlement reached with UMWA in December 2014, the benefit obligation for the other postretirement plan is no longer affected by healthcare cost trends.

Contributions and Benefit Payments

Employer contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are expected to be $4 million and $— million, respectively, during 2023. Funding to PacifiCorp's Retirement Plan trust is based upon the actuarially determined costs of the plan and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") and the Pension Protection Act of 2006, as amended ("PPA of 2006"). PacifiCorp considers contributing additional amounts from time to time in order to achieve certain funding levels specified under the PPA of 2006. PacifiCorp evaluates a variety of factors, including funded status, income tax laws and regulatory requirements, in determining contributions to its other postretirement benefit plan.

224


The expected benefit payments to participants in PacifiCorp's pension and other postretirement benefit plans for 2023 through 2027 and for the five years thereafter are summarized below (in millions):
Projected Benefit Payments
PensionOther Postretirement
2023$76 $23 
202473 22 
202570 21 
202667 20 
202764 20 
2028-2032277 87 

Plan Assets

Investment Policy and Asset Allocations

PacifiCorp's investment policy for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans is to balance risk and return through a diversified portfolio of debt securities, equity securities and other alternative investments. Maturities for debt securities are managed to targets consistent with prudent risk tolerances. The plans retain outside investment consultants to advise on plan investments within the parameters outlined by the Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company Investment Committee. The investment portfolio is managed in line with the investment policy with sufficient liquidity to meet near-term benefit payments.

In 2020, the assets of the PacifiCorp Master Retirement Trust were transferred into the BHE Master Retirement Trust.

The target allocations (percentage of plan assets) for PacifiCorp's pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets are as follows as of December 31, 2022:
Pension(1)
Other Postretirement(1)
%%
Debt securities(2)
7377
Equity securities(2)
2223
Other50

(1)The trust in which the PacifiCorp Retirement Plan is invested includes a separate account that is used to fund benefits for the other postretirement benefit plan. In addition to this separate account, the assets for the other postretirement benefit plan are held in Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association ("VEBA") trusts, each of which has its own investment allocation strategies. Target allocations for the other postretirement benefit plan include the separate account of the Retirement Plan trust and the VEBA trusts.
(2)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds are allocated based on the underlying forward commodity prices, interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthinessinvestments in debt and durationequity securities.

225


Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the fair value of contracts. plan assets, by major category, for PacifiCorp's defined benefit pension plan (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash equivalents$— $10 $— $10 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations41 — — 41 
Corporate obligations— 211 — 211 
Municipal obligations— 15 — 15 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 34 — 34 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies69 — — 69 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$110 $270 $— $380 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
346 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
32 
Investments at fair value$758 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash equivalents$— $15 $— $15 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations51 — — 51 
Corporate obligations— 299 — 299 
Municipal obligations— 22 — 22 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 38 — 38 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies61 — — 61 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$112 $374 $— $486 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
538 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
34 
Investments at fair value$1,058 

(1)Refer to Note 1113 for furtheradditional discussion regarding PacifiCorp's risk management and hedging activities.the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.

PacifiCorp's investments in money market(2)Investment funds are substantially comprised of mutual funds and investmentcollective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 50% and 50%, respectively, for 2022 and 59% and 41%, respectively, for 2021, and are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 90% and 10%, respectively, for 2022 and 84% and 16%, respectively, for 2021.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate.

226


The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for PacifiCorp's defined benefit other postretirement plan (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash and cash equivalents$$$— $10 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations— — 
Corporate obligations— 49 — 49 
Municipal obligations— 13 — 13 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 47 — 47 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies— — 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$18 $114 $— 132 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
132 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
— 
Investments at fair value$264 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash and cash equivalents$$$— $
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations24 — — 24 
Corporate obligations— 79 — 79 
Municipal obligations— 15 — 15 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 35 — 35 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies— — 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$32 $130 $— 162 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
161 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
Investments at fair value$324 

(1)Refer to Note 13 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)Investment funds are stated at fair valuesubstantially comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 41% and 59%, respectively, for 2022 and 39% and 61%, respectively, for 2021, and are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 91% and 9%, respectively, for 2022 and 90% and 10%, respectively, for 2021.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily accounted for as available-for-sale securities. When available, PacifiCorp usesin real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.

For level 1 investments, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value. In the absence of a quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security,For level 2 investments, the fair value is determined using pricing models or net asset values based on observable market inputsinputs. Shares of mutual funds not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, private equity limited partnership interests, common and quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristics.

PacifiCorp's long-term debt is carriedcommingled trust funds and investment entities are reported at costfair value based on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Thenet asset value per unit, which is used for expedience purposes. A fund's net asset value is based on the fair value of PacifiCorp's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The carrying value of PacifiCorp's variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value because ofunderlying assets held by the frequent repricing of these instruments at market rates. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of PacifiCorp's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):fund less its liabilities.


 2017 2016
 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
 Value Value Value Value
        
Long-term debt$7,005
 $8,370
 $7,052
 $8,204

(13)Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

PacifiCorp is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. PacifiCorp does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.
Environmental Laws and Regulations

PacifiCorp is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, renewable portfolio standards, emissions performance standards, climate change, coal combustion byproduct disposal, hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact PacifiCorp's current and future operations. PacifiCorp believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.


Hydroelectric Relicensing


PacifiCorp's Klamath hydroelectric systemPacifiCorp is currently operating under annual licenses witha party to the FERC. In February 2010, PacifiCorp, the United States Department of the Interior, the United States Department of Commerce, the state of California, the state of Oregon and various other governmental and non-governmental settlement parties signed the2016 amended Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement ("KHSA"). Among other things, the KHSA provided that the United States Department of the Interior would conduct scientific and engineering studies, which is intended to assess whether removal ofresolve disputes surrounding PacifiCorp's efforts to relicense the Klamath hydroelectric system's mainstem dams was in the public interest and would advance restoration of the Klamath Basin's salmonid fisheries. If it was determined that dam removal should proceed, dam removal would begin no earlier than 2020.

Congress failed to pass legislation needed to implement the original KHSA. Hence, in February 2016, the principal parties to theHydroelectric Project. The KHSA (PacifiCorp, the states of California and Oregon and the United States Departments of the Interior and Commerce) executed an agreement in principle committing to explore potential amendment of the KHSA to facilitate removal of the Klamath dams throughestablishes a FERC process without the need for federal legislation. On April 6, 2016, PacifiCorp, the states of California and Oregon and the United States Departments of the Interior and CommerceCalifornia ("States") and other stakeholders executed an amendment to the KHSA. Consistentassess whether dam removal can occur consistent with the termssettlement's terms. For PacifiCorp, the key elements of the amended KHSA, on September 23, 2016, PacifiCorpsettlement include: (1) a contribution from PacifiCorp's Oregon and California customers capped at $200 million plus $250 million in California bond funds; (2) complete indemnification from harms associated with dam removal; (3) transfer of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") license to a third-party dam removal entity, the Klamath River Renewal Corporation ("KRRC"), who would conduct dam removal; and (4) ability for PacifiCorp to operate the facilities for the benefit of customers until dam removal commences.

In September 2016, the KRRC and PacifiCorp filed a private, independent nonprofit 501(c)(3) organization formed by signatories of the amended KSHA, jointly filed anjoint application with the FERC to transfer the license for the four mainstem Klamath River hydroelectric generating facilitiesdams comprising the Lower Klamath Project (FERC Project No. 14803) from PacifiCorp to the KRRC. Also on September 23, 2016,The FERC approved the KRRC filed an application with the FERC to surrender the license and decommission the facilities. The KRRC's license surrender application included a request for the FERC to refrain from acting on the surrender application until after thepartial transfer of the Klamath license in a July 2020 order, subject to the KRRC is effective.

condition that PacifiCorp remains co-licensee. Under the amended KHSA, PacifiCorp did not agree to remain co-licensee during the surrender and removal process given concerns about liability protections for PacifiCorp and its customerscustomers. In November 2020, PacifiCorp entered a memorandum of agreement (the "MOA") with the KRRC, the Karuk Tribe, the Yurok Tribe and the States to continue implementation of the KHSA. The agreement required the States, PacifiCorp and KRRC to be protected from uncapped dam removal costs and liabilities. The KRRC must indemnifyfile a new license transfer application to remove PacifiCorp from liabilities associated with dam removal. The amended KHSA also limits PacifiCorp's contribution to facilities removal costs to no more than $200 million,the license for the Lower Klamath Project and add the States and KRRC as co-licensees for the purposes of which up to $184 million would be collected from PacifiCorp's Oregon customers withsurrender. In addition, the remainder to be collected from PacifiCorp's California customers. California voters approved a water bond measure in November 2014 from which the state of California's contribution towards facilities removal costs will be drawn. In accordance with this bond measure,MOA provides for additional contingency funding of up$45 million, equally split between PacifiCorp and the States, and for PacifiCorp and the States to $250 million for facilities removal costs was includedequally share in any additional cost overruns in the California state budget in 2016, with the funding effective for at least five years. If facilitiesunlikely event that dam removal costs exceed the combined$450 million in funding that will be availableto ensure dam removal is complete. The MOA also requires PacifiCorp to cover the costs associated with certain pre-existing environmental conditions. In June 2021, the FERC approved the transfer of the Lower Klamath Project dams from PacifiCorp'sPacifiCorp to the KRRC and the States as co-licensees. In July 2021, the Oregon, Wyoming, Idaho and California customers andstate public utility commissions conditionally approved the staterequired property transfer applications. In August 2021, PacifiCorp notified the Public Service Commission of California, sufficient funds would need to be providedUtah of the property transfer, however no formal approval is required in Utah. In August 2022, the FERC staff issued a final environmental impact statement for the project, concluding that dam removal is the preferred action. In November 2022, the FERC issued a license surrender order for the project, which was accepted by the KRRC or an entity other than PacifiCorp in order for removal to proceed.

If certain conditions in the amended KHSA are not satisfied and the license does notStates in December 2022, along with the transfer of the Lower Klamath Project dams. Although PacifiCorp no longer owns the Lower Klamath Project, PacifiCorp will continue to operate the facilities under an operation and maintenance agreement with the KRRC PacifiCorp will resume relicensing withuntil each facility is ready for removal. Removal of the FERC.Copco No. 2 facility is anticipated to begin in 2023, and removal of the remaining three dams (J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, and Iron Gate) is anticipated to begin in 2024.


As of December 31, 2017, PacifiCorp's assets included $55 million of costs associated with the Klamath hydroelectric system's mainstem dams and the associated relicensing and settlement costs, which are being depreciated and amortized in accordance with state regulatory approvals through either December 31, 2019, or December 31, 2022, depending upon the state jurisdiction.

Hydroelectric Commitments


Certain of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric licenses and settlement agreements contain requirements for PacifiCorp to make certain capital and operating expenditures related to its hydroelectric facilities. PacifiCorp estimates it is obligatedfacilities, which are estimated to make capital expenditures ofbe approximately $239$282 million over the next 10 yearsyears.

Legal Matters

The Company is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. The Company does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. The Company is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties and other costs in substantial amounts and are described below.

Wildfires Overview - PacifiCorp

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. PacifiCorp evaluates the related range of reasonably estimated losses and records a loss based on its best estimate within that range or the lower end of the range if there is no better estimate.


170


In California, under inverse condemnation, courts have held that investor-owned utilities can be liable for real and personal property damages from wildfires without the utility being found negligent and regardless of fault. California law also permits inverse condemnation plaintiffs to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs. In both Oregon and California, PacifiCorp has equipment in areas accessed through special use permits, easements or similar agreements that may contain provisions requiring it to pay for damages caused by its equipment regardless of fault. Even if inverse condemnation or other provisions do not apply, PacifiCorp could be found liable for all damages proximately caused by negligence, including real and personal property and natural resource damages; fire suppression costs; personal injury and loss of life damages; and interest.

2020 Wildfires

In September 2020, a severe weather event resulting in high winds, low humidity and warm temperatures contributed to several major wildfires, which resulted in real and personal property and natural resource damage, personal injuries and loss of life and widespread power outages in Oregon and Northern California (the "2020 Wildfires"). The wildfires spread across certain parts of PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas across multiple counties in Oregon and California, including Siskiyou County, California; Jackson County, Oregon; Douglas County, Oregon; Marion County, Oregon; Lincoln County, Oregon; and Klamath County, Oregon burning over 500,000 acres in aggregate. Third party reports for these wildfires indicate over 2,000 structures destroyed, including residences; several structures damaged; multiple individuals injured; and several fatalities. Fire suppression costs estimated by various agencies total approximately $150 million.

Investigations into the cause and origin of each wildfire are complex and ongoing and being conducted by various entities, including the U.S. Forest Service, the California Public Utilities Commission, the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Justice, PacifiCorp and various experts engaged by PacifiCorp.

As of the date of this filing, numerous lawsuits have been filed in Oregon and California, including a class action complaint in Oregon, on behalf of plaintiffs related to the 2020 Wildfires. The plaintiffs seek damages that include property damages, economic losses, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and other damages. Additionally, several insurance carriers have filed subrogation complaints in Oregon and California with allegations similar to those made in the aforementioned lawsuits. The final determinations of liability, however, will only be made following the completion of comprehensive investigations and litigation processes.

PacifiCorp has accrued cumulative estimated probable losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $477 million through December 31, 2022. The accrual includes PacifiCorp's estimate of losses for fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages that are considered probable of being incurred and that it is reasonably able to estimate at this time. For certain aspects of the 2020 Wildfires for which loss is considered probable, information necessary to reasonably estimate the potential losses, such as those related to certain areas of natural resource damages, is not currently available.

It is reasonably possible PacifiCorp will incur additional losses beyond the amounts accrued; however, PacifiCorp is currently unable to estimate the range of possible additional losses that could be incurred due to the number of properties and parties involved and the variation in those types of properties and lack of available details. To the extent losses beyond the amounts accrued are incurred, additional insurance coverage is expected to be available to cover a portion of the losses.

The following table presents changes in PacifiCorp's liability for estimated losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$252 $252 $— 
Accrued losses225 — 252 
Payments(53)— — 
Ending balance$424 $252 $252 

PacifiCorp's receivable for expected insurance recoveries associated with the probable losses was $246 million and $116 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, PacifiCorp recognized probable losses net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively.

171


2022 McKinney Fire

According to California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, on July 29, 2022, at approximately 2:16 p.m. Pacific Time, a wildfire began in the Oak Knoll Ranger District of the Klamath National Forest in Siskiyou County, California (the "2022 McKinney Fire") located in PacifiCorp's service territory. Third party reports indicate that the 2022 McKinney Fire resulted in 11 structures damaged, 185 structures destroyed, 12 injuries and four fatalities and consumed 60,000 acres. The cause of the 2022 McKinney Fire is undetermined and remains under investigation by the U.S. Forest Service.

Due to the preliminary nature of the investigation PacifiCorp does not believe a loss is probable and therefore has not accrued any loss as of the date of this filing. While the loss is not probable, PacifiCorp estimates the potential loss, excluding losses for natural resource damages, to be $31 million, net of expected insurance recoveries. The loss estimate includes PacifiCorp's estimate of losses for fire suppression costs; real and personal property damages; and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. PacifiCorp is unable to estimate the total potential loss, including losses for natural resource damages, because there are a number of unknown facts and legal considerations that may impact the amount of any potential liability, including the total scope and nature of claims that may be asserted against PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp has insurance available and estimates the potential insurance recoveries to be $103 million, to cover potential losses.

As of the date of this filing, multiple lawsuits have been filed in California on behalf of plaintiffs related to the 2022 McKinney Fire. The plaintiffs seek damages that include property damages, economic losses, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and other damages but the amount of damages sought are not specified. The final determinations of liability, however, will only be made following the completion of comprehensive investigations and litigation processes.

Guarantees

The Company has entered into guarantees as part of the normal course of business and the sale of certain assets. These guarantees are not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial results.

(17)    Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Energy Products and Services

The following table summarizes the Company's energy products and services Customer Revenue by regulated energy and nonregulated energy, with further disaggregation of regulated energy by line of business, including a reconciliation to the Company's reportable segment information included in Note 22, for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
2022
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$5,099 $2,320 $3,465 $— $— $— $— $— $10,884 
Retail Gas— 855 167 — — — — — 1,022 
Wholesale260 668 92 — — — (4)1,024 
Transmission and
   distribution
166 61 76 1,081 — 683 — — 2,067 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 2,603 — — (127)2,476 
Other102 — — — — (2)105 
Total Regulated5,627 3,904 3,802 1,081 2,614 683 — (133)17,578 
Nonregulated— — 169 1,076 70 866 597 2,785 
Total Customer Revenue5,627 3,911 3,802 1,250 3,690 753 866 464 20,363 
Other revenue52 114 22 115 154 (21)128 142 706 
Total$5,679 $4,025 $3,824 $1,365 $3,844 $732 $994 $606 $21,069 
172


2021
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$4,847 $2,128 $2,828 $— $— $— $— $(2)$9,801 
Retail Gas— 859 115 — — — — — 974 
Wholesale157 454 62 — 57 — — (3)727 
Transmission and
   distribution
143 58 74 1,023 — 702 — — 2,000 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 2,404 — — (131)2,273 
Other108 — — (1)— — 109 
Total Regulated5,255 3,499 3,080 1,023 2,460 702 — (135)15,884 
Nonregulated— 15 43 956 35 796 576 2,424 
Total Customer Revenue5,255 3,514 3,083 1,066 3,416 737 796 441 18,308 
Other revenue41 33 24 122 128 (6)185 100 627 
Total$5,296 $3,547 $3,107 $1,188 $3,544 $731 $981 $541 $18,935 
2020
PacifiCorpMidAmerican FundingNV EnergyNorthern PowergridBHE Pipeline GroupBHE TransmissionBHE Renewables
BHE and
Other(1)
Total
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Retail Electric$4,932 $1,924 $2,566 $— $— $— $— $(1)$9,421 
Retail Gas— 505 114 — — — — — 619 
Wholesale107 199 45 — 17 — — (2)366 
Transmission and
   distribution
96 60 95 887 — 641 — — 1,779 
Interstate pipeline— — — — 1,397 — — (139)1,258 
Other108 — — — — — — 110 
Total Regulated5,243 2,688 2,822 887 1,414 641 — (142)13,553 
Nonregulated— 16 26 134 18 817 515 1,528 
Total Customer Revenue5,243 2,704 2,824 913 1,548 659 817 373 15,081 
Other revenue98 24 30 109 30 — 119 65 475 
Total$5,341 $2,728 $2,854 $1,022 $1,578 $659 $936 $438 $15,556 
(1)The BHE and Other reportable segment represents amounts related principally to other entities, including MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

Real Estate Services

The following table summarizes the Company's real estate services Customer Revenue by line of business for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
HomeServices
202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Brokerage$4,867 $5,498 $4,520 
Franchise66 85 76 
Total Customer Revenue4,933 5,583 4,596 
Mortgage and other revenue335 632 800 
Total$5,268 $6,215 $5,396 
173


Remaining Performance Obligations

The following table summarizes the Company's revenue it expects to recognize in future periods related to significant unsatisfied remaining performance obligations for fixed contracts with expected durations in excess of one year as of December 31, 2022, by reportable segment (in millions):
Performance obligations expected to be satisfied
Less than 12 monthsMore than 12 monthsTotal
BHE Pipeline Group$2,835 $20,619 $23,454 
BHE Transmission679 — 679 
Total$3,514 $20,619 $24,133 

(18)BHE Shareholders' Equity

Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, BHE had 849,982 and 1,649,988 shares outstanding of its Perpetual Preferred Stock (the "4% Perpetual Preferred Stock") issued to certain subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. The 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share and currently pays a 4.00% dividend per share on the liquidation preference. Dividends shall accrue and accumulate daily, be cumulative, compound semi-annually and, if declared, be payable in cash semi-annually in arrears on May 15 and November 15 of each year. If dividends are not declared and paid, any accumulating dividends shall continue to accumulate and compound. BHE may not make any dividends on shares of any other class or series of its capital stock (other than for dividends on shares of common stock payable in shares of common stock, unless the holders of the then outstanding 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock shall first receive, or simultaneously receive, a dividend in an amount at least equivalent to the amount accumulated and not previously paid. BHE may not declare or pay any dividends on shares of the 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock if such declaration or payment would constitute an event of default on BHE's senior indebtedness (as defined). BHE may, at its option, redeem the 4% Perpetual Preferred Stock in whole or in part at any time at a price per share equal to the liquidation preference.

Common Stock

On March 14, 2000, and as amended on December 7, 2005, BHE's shareholders entered into a Shareholder Agreement that provides specific rights to certain shareholders. One of these licenses.rights allows certain shareholders the ability to put their common shares to BHE at the then-current fair value dependent on certain circumstances controlled by BHE.



In June 2022, BHE purchased 740,961 shares of its common stock held by Mr. Gregory E. Abel, BHE's Chair, for $870 million. The purchase was pursuant to the terms of BHE's Shareholders Agreement.

Restricted Net Assets

BHE has maximum debt-to-total capitalization percentage restrictions imposed by its senior unsecured credit facilities expiring in June 2025 which, in certain circumstances, limit BHE's ability to make cash dividends or distributions. As a result of this restriction, BHE has restricted net assets of $18.8 billion as of December 31, 2022.

Certain of BHE's subsidiaries have restrictions on their ability to dividend, loan or advance funds to BHE due to specific legal or regulatory restrictions, including, but not limited to, maximum debt-to-total capitalization percentages and commitments made to state commissions. As a result of these restrictions, BHE's subsidiaries had restricted net assets of $20.4 billion as of December 31, 2022.


174


(19)Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

The following table shows the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss attributable to BHE shareholders by each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income taxes, for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
UnrecognizedForeignUnrealizedAOCI
Amounts onCurrencyGains (Losses)Attributable
RetirementTranslationon Cash FlowNoncontrollingTo BHE
BenefitsAdjustmentHedgesInterestsShareholders, Net
Balance, December 31, 2019$(417)$(1,296)$$— $(1,706)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(65)234 (15)— 154 
BHE GT&S acquisition(10)— — 10 — 
Balance, December 31, 2020(492)(1,062)(8)10 (1,552)
Other comprehensive income (loss)174 (24)67 (5)212 
Balance, December 31, 2021(318)(1,086)59 (1,340)
Other comprehensive (loss) income(72)(810)76 (3)(809)
Balance, December 31, 2022$(390)$(1,896)$135 $$(2,149)

Reclassifications from AOCI to net income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 were insignificant. Additionally, refer to the "Foreign Operations" discussion in Note 13 for information about unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits reclassifications from AOCI that do not impact net income in their entirety.

(20)Variable Interest Entities and Noncontrolling Interests

The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE and to disclose certain information about its significant variable interests in the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

As part of the GT&S Transaction, BHE acquired an indirect 25% economic interest in Cove Point, consisting of 100% of the general partnership interest and 25% of the total limited partnership interests. BHE concluded that Cove Point is a VIE due to the limited partners lacking the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. BHE is the primary beneficiary of Cove Point as it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact its economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses and benefits which could be significant to it.

Included in noncontrolling interests on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are (i) Dominion Energy's 50% interest in Cove Point and Brookfield Super-Core Infrastructure Partner's 25% interest in Cove Point and (ii) preferred securities of subsidiaries of $58 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, consisting of $56 million of 8.061% cumulative preferred securities of Northern Electric plc, a subsidiary of Northern Powergrid, which are redeemable in the event of the revocation of Northern Electric plc's electricity distribution license by the Secretary of State, and $2 million of nonredeemable preferred stock of PacifiCorp.

175


(21)Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$2,071 $2,041 $1,855 
Income taxes received, net(1)
$1,863 $1,309 $1,361 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$1,049 $834 $801 

(1)Includes $1,961 million, $1,441 million and $1,504 million of income taxes received from Berkshire Hathaway in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

(22)Segment Information

The Company's reportable segments with foreign operations include Northern Powergrid, whose business is principally in the United Kingdom, and BHE Transmission, whose business includes operations in Canada. Intersegment eliminations and adjustments, including the allocation of goodwill, have been made. Information related to the Company's reportable segments is shown below (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
PacifiCorp$5,679 $5,296 $5,341 
MidAmerican Funding4,025 3,547 2,728 
NV Energy3,824 3,107 2,854 
Northern Powergrid1,365 1,188 1,022 
BHE Pipeline Group3,844 3,544 1,578 
BHE Transmission732 731 659 
BHE Renewables994 981 936 
HomeServices5,268 6,215 5,396 
BHE and Other(1)
606 541 438 
Total operating revenue$26,337 $25,150 $20,952 
   
Depreciation and amortization:   
PacifiCorp$1,120 $1,088 $1,209 
MidAmerican Funding1,168 914 716 
NV Energy566 549 502 
Northern Powergrid361 305 266 
BHE Pipeline Group508 492 231 
BHE Transmission239 238 201 
BHE Renewables264 241 284 
HomeServices56 52 45 
BHE and Other(1)
Total depreciation and amortization$4,286 $3,881 $3,455 
   
176


Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating income:
PacifiCorp$1,158 $1,133 $924 
MidAmerican Funding438 416 454 
NV Energy606 621 649 
Northern Powergrid551 543 421 
BHE Pipeline Group1,720 1,516 779 
BHE Transmission333 339 316 
BHE Renewables300 329 291 
HomeServices151 505 511 
BHE and Other(1)
(16)(75)(54)
Total operating income5,241 5,327 4,291 
Interest expense(2,216)(2,118)(2,021)
Capitalized interest76 64 80 
Allowance for equity funds167 126 165 
Interest and dividend income154 89 71 
(Losses) gains on marketable securities, net(2,002)1,823 4,797 
Other, net(7)(17)88 
Total income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss$1,413 $5,294 $7,471 
Interest expense:
PacifiCorp$431 $430 $426 
MidAmerican Funding333 319 322 
NV Energy221 206 227 
Northern Powergrid133 130 130 
BHE Pipeline Group148 143 74 
BHE Transmission153 155 148 
BHE Renewables175 158 166 
HomeServices11 
BHE and Other(1)
615 573 517 
Total interest expense$2,216 $2,118 $2,021 
Income tax (benefit) expense:
PacifiCorp$(61)$(78)$(75)
MidAmerican Funding(776)(680)(574)
NV Energy56 56 61 
Northern Powergrid75 192 96 
BHE Pipeline Group276 269 162 
BHE Transmission14 10 13 
BHE Renewables(2)
(887)(753)(602)
HomeServices47 138 138 
BHE and Other(1)
(660)(286)1,089 
Total income tax (benefit) expense$(1,916)$(1,132)$308 
177


Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Earnings on common shares:
PacifiCorp$921 $889 $741 
MidAmerican Funding947 883 818 
NV Energy427 439 410 
Northern Powergrid385 247 201 
BHE Pipeline Group1,040 807 528 
BHE Transmission247 247 231 
BHE Renewables(2)
625 451 521 
HomeServices100 387 375 
BHE and Other(1)
(2,017)1,319 3,092 
Total earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $6,917 
Capital expenditures:
PacifiCorp$2,166 $1,513 $2,540 
MidAmerican Funding1,869 1,912 1,836 
NV Energy1,113 749 675 
Northern Powergrid768 742 682 
BHE Pipeline Group1,157 1,128 659 
BHE Transmission200 279 372 
BHE Renewables138 225 95 
HomeServices48 42 36 
BHE and Other46 21 (130)
Total capital expenditures$7,505 $6,611 $6,765 
As of December 31,
202220212020
Property, plant and equipment, net:
PacifiCorp$24,430 $22,914 $22,430 
MidAmerican Funding21,092 20,302 19,279 
NV Energy10,993 10,231 9,865 
Northern Powergrid7,445 7,572 7,230 
BHE Pipeline Group16,216 15,692 15,097 
BHE Transmission6,209 6,590 6,445 
BHE Renewables6,231 6,103 5,645 
HomeServices188 169 159 
BHE and Other239 243 (22)
Total property, plant and equipment, net$93,043 $89,816 $86,128 
178


As of December 31,
202220212020
Total assets:
PacifiCorp$30,559 $27,615 $26,862 
MidAmerican Funding26,077 25,352 23,530 
NV Energy16,676 15,239 14,501 
Northern Powergrid9,005 9,326 8,782 
BHE Pipeline Group21,005 20,434 19,541 
BHE Transmission9,334 9,476 9,208 
BHE Renewables11,458 11,829 12,004 
HomeServices3,436 4,574 4,955 
BHE and Other6,290 8,220 7,933 
Total assets$133,840 $132,065 $127,316 
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue by country:
U.S.$24,263 $23,215 $19,254 
United Kingdom1,345 1,188 1,022 
Canada709 719 653 
Australia20 — — 
Other— 28 23 
Total operating revenue by country$26,337 $25,150 $20,952 
Income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss by country:
U.S.$771 $4,650 $6,954 
United Kingdom447 454 338 
Canada181 181 173 
Australia15 (8)— 
Other(1)17 
Total income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity loss by country$1,413 $5,294 $7,471 
As of December 31,
202220212020
Property, plant and equipment, net by country:
U.S.$79,578 $75,774 $72,583 
United Kingdom6,959 7,487 7,134 
Canada6,091 6,547 6,401 
Australia415 10 
Total property, plant and equipment, net by country$93,043 $89,816 $86,128 

(1)The differences between the reportable segment amounts and the consolidated amounts, described as BHE and Other, relate to other corporate entities, including MidAmerican Energy Services, LLC, corporate functions and intersegment eliminations.

(2)Income tax (benefit) expense includes the tax attributes of disregarded entities that are not required to pay income taxes and the earnings of which are taxable directly to BHE.

179


The following table shows the change in the carrying amount of goodwill by reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 (in millions):
BHE
MidAmericanNVNorthernPipelineBHEBHE
PacifiCorpFundingEnergyPowergridGroupTransmissionRenewablesHomeServicesTotal
December 31, 2020$1,129 $2,102 $2,369 $1,000 $1,803 $1,551 $95 $1,457 $11,506 
Acquisitions— — — — 11 — — 129 140 
Foreign currency translation— — — (8)— 12 — — 
December 31, 20211,129 2,102 2,369 992 1,814 1,563 95 1,586 11,650 
Acquisitions— — — — — — — 16 16 
Foreign currency translation— — — (75)— (102)— — (177)
December 31, 2022$1,129 $2,102 $2,369 $917 $1,814 $1,461 $95 $1,602 $11,489 

180


PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section

181


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of PacifiCorp during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with PacifiCorp's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. PacifiCorp's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

Results of Operations

Overview

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2022, was $920 million, an increase of $32 million, or 4%, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher utility margin, lower other expense, including higher allowance for equity and borrowed funds used during construction and lower property and other taxes, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance expense, largely due to higher general and plant maintenance costs and an increase to the wildfire damage provision, higher depreciation and amortization expense, and lower income tax benefit. Utility margin increased primarily due to higher net power cost deferrals, higher retail prices and volumes, higher average wholesale market prices, lower coal-fueled generation volumes and higher net wheeling revenues, partially offset by higher natural gas-fueled generation prices and volumes, higher purchased electricity costs from higher volumes and prices, higher coal-fueled generation prices, lower wind-based ancillary revenues, and lower wholesale volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.6% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable impacts of weather and an increase in commercial customer usage, partially offset by a decrease in residential and industrial customer usage. Energy generated decreased 4% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due lower coal-fueled generation, partially offset by higher wind-powered, natural gas-fueled and hydroelectric-powered generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes decreased 5% and purchased electricity volumes increased 20%.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021, was $888 million, an increase of $149 million, or 20%, compared to 2020, primarily due to higher utility gross margin (excluding $231 million of decreases fully offset in depreciation, operating, other income/expense and income tax expense due to prior year regulatory adjustments); lower operations and maintenance expense primarily due to prior year costs associated with the 2020 Wildfires and changes in how obligations associated with the implementation of the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met; and favorable income tax expense from higher PTCs recognized due to new wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service and the impacts of ratemaking; partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense (excluding $376 million of decreases offset in operating revenue and income tax expense due to prior year regulatory adjustments) from the impacts of the depreciation study for which rates became effective January 2021 and higher plant in-service; and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds used during construction. Utility margin increased $145 million (excluding the $231 million of fully offsetting decreases) primarily due to the higher retail, wheeling and wholesale revenue; higher deferred net power costs; and lower purchased electricity volumes; partially offset by higher purchased electricity prices; and higher natural gas- and coal-fueled generation costs. Retail customer volumes increased 3.1% due to increase in customer usage, increase in the average number of customers and favorable impacts of weather. Energy generated increased 10% for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due higher wind-powered, natural gas-fueled and coal-fueled generation, partially offset by lower hydroelectric-powered generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes decreased 3% and purchased electricity volumes decreased 17%.

182


Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Management utilizes various key financial measures that are prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as, utility margin, to help evaluate results of operations. Utility margin is calculated as operating revenue less cost of fuel and energy, which are captions presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

PacifiCorp's cost of fuel and energy is generally recovered from its retail customers through regulatory recovery mechanisms and, as a result, changes in PacifiCorp's expenses included in regulatory recovery mechanisms result in comparable changes to revenue. As such, management believes utility margin more appropriately and concisely explains profitability rather than a discussion of revenue and cost of fuel and energy separately. Management believes the presentation of utility margin provides meaningful and valuable insight into the information management considers important to running the business and a measure of comparability to others in the industry.
Utility margin is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating income, which is the most directly comparable financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table provides a reconciliation of utility margin to operating income for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin:
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 148 1,831 1,790 41 
Utility margin3,700 3,465 235 3,465 3,551 (86)(2)
Operations and maintenance1,227 1,031 196 19 1,031 1,209 (178)(15)
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 32 1,088 1,209 (121)(10)
Property and other taxes195 213 (18)(8)213 209 
Operating income$1,158 $1,133 $25 %$1,133 $924 $209 23 %

183


Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to utility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $383 %$5,296 $5,341 $(45)(1)%
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 148 1,831 1,790 41 
Utility margin$3,700 $3,465 $235 %$3,465 $3,551 $(86)(2)%
Sales (GWhs):
Residential18,425 17,905 520 %17,905 17,150 755 %
Commercial(1)
19,570 18,839 731 18,839 17,727 1,112 
Industrial(1)
17,622 17,909 (287)(2)17,909 18,039 (130)(1)
Other(1)
1,547 1,621 (74)(5)1,621 1,644 (23)(1)
Total retail57,164 56,274 890 56,274 54,560 1,714 
Wholesale4,836 5,113 (277)(5)5,113 5,249 (136)(3)
Total sales62,000 61,387 613 %61,387 59,809 1,578 %
Average number of retail customers
(in thousands)2,037 2,003 34 %2,003 1,967 36 %
Average revenue per MWh:
Retail$89.33 $86.08 $3.25 %$86.08 $90.59 $(4.51)(5)%
Wholesale$61.39 $37.90 $23.49 62 %$37.90 $35.56 $2.34 %
Heating degree days10,767 9,914 853 %9,914 10,155 (241)(2)%
Cooling degree days2,451 2,431 20 %2,431 2,111 320 15 %
Sources of energy (GWhs)(1):
Coal28,390 31,566 (3,176)(10)%31,566 30,636 930 %
Natural gas13,686 13,323 363 13,323 12,045 1,278 11 
Wind(2)
7,238 6,686 552 6,686 3,769 2,917 77 
Hydroelectric and other(2)
3,206 3,010 196 3,010 3,223 (213)(7)
Total energy generated52,520 54,585 (2,065)(4)54,585 49,673 4,912 10 
Energy purchased13,968 11,601 2,367 20 11,601 14,054 (2,453)(17)
Total66,488 66,186 302 — %66,186 63,727 2,459 %
Average cost of energy per MWh:
Energy generated(3)
$22.86 $18.05 $4.81 27 %$18.05 $18.74 $(0.69)(4)%
Energy purchased$71.15 $66.93 $4.22 %$66.93 $47.60 $19.33 41 %

(1)    GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.
(2)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements or (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities.
(3)    The average cost per MWh of energy generated includes only the cost of fuel associated with the generating facilities.


184


Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021

Utility margin increased $235 million, or 7% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to:
$290 million from higher deferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms;
$263 million of higher retail revenue primarily due to higher average prices and higher volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 1.6% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable impacts of weather and an increase in commercial customer usage, partially offset by a decrease in residential and industrial customer usage;
$103 million of higher wholesale revenue primarily due to higher average market prices, partially offset by lower volumes;
$44 million of lower coal-fueled generation costs due to lower volumes, partially offset by higher average prices; and
$19 million of favorable wheeling activities.
The increases above were partially offset by:
$259 million of higher natural gas-fueled generation costs primarily due to higher average market prices and higher volumes;
$217 million of higher purchased electricity costs from higher volumes and higher average market prices; and
$10 million of lower wind-based ancillary revenue.

Operations and maintenance increased $196 million, or 19%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to a $64 million increase in the loss accruals associated with the September 2020 wildfires net of estimated insurance recoveries, $38 million of higher plant maintenance costs, $27 million of higher DSM amortization expense (offset in retail revenue), $25 million of changes in the prior year in how obligations associated with the implementation of the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met, $17 million of higher insurance premiums due to cost increases related to wildfire coverage, $37 million of higher consumption of materials, chemical and start-up fuel costs, partially offset by $22 million of deferrals of vegetation management costs in Oregon and Utah, net of higher vegetation management costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $32 million, or 3%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher plant-in-service balances in the current year and prior year deferral of the 2018 depreciation study in Idaho compared to current year amortization, partially offset by current year allocation adjustment for Oregon incremental depreciation of certain coal units and Oregon deferral associated with the depreciation of certain wind-powered generating facilities.

Property and other taxes decreased $18 million, or 8%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower property tax rates in Utah.

Allowance for borrowed and equity funds increased $28 million, or 38%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher qualified construction work-in-progress balances and higher rates.

Interest and dividend income increased $20 million, or 83%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to the recording of interest on the 2021 Oregon PCAM deferral and higher investment income due to higher average interest rates.

Other, net decreased$23 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies driven by market declines, unfavorable change in deferred compensation and long-term incentive plan primarily due to market movements (offset in operations and maintenance expense) and higher pension costs primarily due to lower expected return on net assets.

Income tax benefit decreased $17 million, or 22%, for 2022 compared to 2021. The effective tax rate was (7)% and (10)% for 2022 and 2021, respectively. The effective tax rate increased primarily as a result of lower effects of ratemaking associated with excess deferred income tax amortization and an increase to the valuation allowance for state net operating losses, partially offset by increased PTCs from PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities in the current year.

185


Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

Utility margin decreased $86 million (including the $231 million of fully offsetting decreases) for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to:
$111 million of higher purchased electricity costs due to higher average prices, partially offset by lower volumes;
$99 million of lower retail revenue primarily due to $234 million fully offset in depreciation expense, income tax expense, fuel expense, and other income (expense) due to accelerated depreciation of certain coal-fueled units in Utah and Oregon and recognition of certain Utah regulatory balances in the prior year, and lower average retail prices, partially offset by higher retail customer volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 3.1% due to an increase in residential and commercial customer usage, increase in the average number of customers and favorable impacts of weather, primarily in Oregon, Washington and Idaho;
$88 million of higher natural gas-fueled generation costs primarily due to higher average prices and higher volumes; and
$34 million of lower other revenue due to prior year recognition of previously deferred other revenue in Oregon that was used to accelerate the depreciation of certain retired wind equipment as a result of the 2020 Oregon RAC settlement (offset in depreciation expense).
The decreases above were partially offset by:
$141 million primarily from higher deferred net power costs in accordance with established adjustment mechanisms;
$43 million of favorable wheeling activities;
$33 million of lower coal-fueled generation costs primarily due to $37 million of accelerated recognition of certain Utah regulatory balances associated with the 2015 Utah mine disposition and certain Cholla Unit 4 related closure costs in Oregon and Idaho (offset in income tax expense) in the prior year and lower prices, partially offset by higher volumes;
$19 million of higher other revenue primarily due to higher REC, fly ash and by-product revenues; and
$7 million of higher wholesale revenue due to higher average wholesale market prices, partially offset by lower wholesale volumes.

Operations and maintenance decreased $178 million, or 15%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to prior year estimated losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $136 million, net of expected insurance recoveries, changes in how obligations associated with the implementation of the Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement will be met, lower thermal plant maintenance expense and lower labor expenses, partially offset by higher wind plant and distribution maintenance and higher legal and insurance expenses associated with the 2020 Wildfires.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $121 million, or 10%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to prior year accelerated depreciation of $376 million as a result of regulatory adjustments ordered by the UPSC, the OPUC and the IPUC (fully offset in retail revenue, other revenue, and income tax expense), including accelerated depreciation of certain coal-fueled units and Oregon's share of certain retired wind equipment as a result the 2020 Oregon RAC settlement, partially offset by the impacts of the depreciation study for which rates became effective January 1, 2021 of approximately $158 million and higher plant in-service balances.

Property and other taxes increased $4 million, or 2%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher property taxes in Oregon and Wyoming, partially offset by lower property taxes in Utah and Washington.

Interest expense increased $4 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher average long-term debt balances, partially offset by a lower weighted average long-term debt interest rate.

Allowance for borrowed and equity funds decreased $72 million, or 49%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower qualified construction work-in-progress balances.

Interest and dividend income increased $14 million, or 140%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher carrying charges on DSM regulatory assets in the current year.

186


Income tax benefit increased $4 million, or 5% for 2021 compared to 2020. The effective tax rate was (10)% and (11)% for 2021 and 2020, respectively. The effective tax rate increased primarily as a result of lower effects of ratemaking associated with excess deferred income tax amortization, offset by increased PTCs from PacifiCorp's new wind-powered generating facilities in the current year. In 2020, $118 million of excess deferred income taxes was amortized pursuant to regulatory orders from Utah, Oregon and Idaho, whereby portions of excess deferred income taxes were used to accelerate depreciation of certain coal-fueled units and Oregon's share of certain retired wind equipment or offset other regulatory balances for these jurisdictions.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp's total net liquidity was as follows (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents$641 
Credit facility(1)
1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(249)
Net credit facility951 
Total net liquidity$1,592 
Credit facility:
Maturity date2025

(1)Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and "Credit Facilities" below for further discussion regarding PacifiCorp's credit facilities.

Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $1.82 billion and $1.80 billion, respectively. The increase is primarily due to higher collections from retail customers, collateral received from counterparties, transmission deposits and cash received for income taxes, partially offset by higher fuel, wholesale and material and supplies purchases.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $1.8 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. The increase is primarily due to higher cash received for income taxes and higher collections from retail customers, partially offset by higher wholesale purchases and timing of operating payables.

The timing of PacifiCorp's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $(2.2) billion and $(1.5) billion, respectively. The increase in net cash outflows from investing activities is mainly due to an increase in capital expenditures of $653 million.

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $(1.5) billion and $(2.5) billion, respectively. The decrease in net cash outflows from investing activities is mainly due to a decrease in capital expenditures of $1.0 billion.

187


Financing Activities

Short-term Debt

As of December 31, 2022, regulatory authorities limited PacifiCorp to $1.5 billion of short-term debt. In January 2023, updated regulatory authorization provided PacifiCorp with an increased limit to $2.0 billion of short-term debt. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had no short-term debt outstanding. For further discussion, refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Long-term Debt

In December 2022, PacifiCorp issued $1.1 billion of its 5.350% First Mortgage Bonds due December 2053. PacifiCorp intends within 24 months of the issuance date to allocate an amount equal to the net proceeds to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, new or existing investments or expenditures made in one or more eligible projects in alignment with BHE's Green Financing Framework. Proceeds will not knowingly be allocated to the same portion of a project that received allocation of proceeds under any other Green Financing Instrument; activities related to the exploration, production, transportation, or consumption of fossil fuels; or activities related to nuclear energy.

PacifiCorp made repayments on long-term debt totaling $155 million and $870 million during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

PacifiCorp's Mortgage and Deed of Trust creates a lien on most of PacifiCorp's electric utility property, allowing the issuance of bonds based on a percentage of utility property additions, bond credits arising from retirement of previously outstanding bonds or deposits of cash. The amount of bonds that PacifiCorp may issue generally is also subject to a net earnings test. As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp estimated it would be able to issue up to $8.5 billion of new first mortgage bonds under the most restrictive issuance test in the mortgage. Any issuances are subject to market conditions and amounts are further limited by regulatory authorizations or commitments or by covenants and tests contained in other financing agreements. PacifiCorp also has the ability to release property from the lien of the mortgage on the basis of property additions, bond credits or deposits of cash.

Credit Facilities

In June 2022, PacifiCorp amended and restated its existing $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2024. The amendment extended the expiration date to June 2025 and amended pricing from the London Interbank Offered Rate to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp entered into an additional $800 million 364-day unsecured credit facility expiring in January 2024.

Debt Authorizations

PacifiCorp currently has regulatory authority from the OPUC and the IPUC to issue an additional $900 million of long-term debt. PacifiCorp must make a notice filing with the WUTC prior to any future issuance. PacifiCorp currently has an effective shelf registration statement with the SEC to issue an indeterminate amount of first mortgage bonds through September 2023.

Preferred Stock

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had non-redeemable preferred stock outstanding with an aggregate stated value of $2 million.

Common Shareholder's Equity

In 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp declared and paid dividends of $100 million and $150 million, respectively, to PPW Holdings LLC.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp declared dividends of $300 million payable to PPW Holdings LLC in February 2023.

188


Capitalization

PacifiCorp manages its capitalization and liquidity position to maintain a prudent capital structure with the objective of retaining strong investment grade credit ratings, which is expected to facilitate continuing access to flexible borrowing arrangements at favorable costs and rates. This objective, subject to periodic review and revision, attempts to balance the interests of all shareholders, customers and creditors and provide a competitive cost of capital and predictable capital market access.

Under existing or prospective authoritative accounting guidance, such as guidance pertaining to consolidations and leases, it is possible that new purchase power and gas agreements, transmission arrangements or amendments to existing arrangements may be accounted for as lease obligations on PacifiCorp's financial statements. While PacifiCorp has successfully amended covenants in financing arrangements that may be impacted, it may be more difficult for PacifiCorp to comply with its capitalization targets or regulatory commitments concerning minimum levels of common equity as a percentage of capitalization. This may lead PacifiCorp to seek amendments or waivers under financing agreements and from regulators, delay or reduce dividends or spending programs, seek additional new equity contributions from its indirect parent company, BHE, or take other actions.

Future Uses of Cash

PacifiCorp has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the issuance of commercial paper, the use of unsecured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which PacifiCorp has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including PacifiCorp's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with PacifiCorp and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.

Capital Expenditures

PacifiCorp has significant future capital requirements. Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, impacts to customer rates; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; outcomes of regulatory proceedings, including regulatory filings for Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; new customer requests; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital.

Historical and forecast capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Wind generation$1,278 $131 $37 $797 $422 $302 
Electric distribution603 608 678 658 536 894 
Electric transmission415 325 1,208 1,431 1,120 1,586 
Solar generation— — — 24 93 286 
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage— 32 105 361 
Other244 444 235 637 793 557 
Total$2,540 $1,513 $2,166 $3,579 $3,069 $3,986 

189


PacifiCorp's 2021 IRP identified a roadmap for a significant increase in renewable and carbon free generation resources, coal-to-natural gas conversion of certain coal-fueled units, energy storage and associated transmission. PacifiCorp's 2021 IRP identified over 1,800 MWs of new wind-powered generation, over 2,100 MWs of new solar-powered generation and nearly 700 MWs of new battery storage capacity that are expected to be online by 2025. PacifiCorp anticipates that the additional new wind-powered generation will be a mixture of owned and contracted resources. PacifiCorp has included an estimate for these new generation resources and associated transmission in its forecast capital expenditures for 2023 through 2025. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. PacifiCorp's historical and forecast capital expenditures include the following:

Wind generation includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Growth projects include construction of new wind-powered generating facilities and construction at existing wind-powered generating facility sites acquired from third parties totaling $23 million for 2022, $118 million for 2021 and $1,148 million for 2020. PacifiCorp placed in-service 516 MWs of new wind-powered generating facilities in 2021 and 674 MWs in 2020. Planned spending for the construction of additional new wind-powered generating facilities and those at acquired sites totals $771 million in 2023, $385 million in 2024 and $251 million in 2025 and is primarily for projects totaling approximately 683 MWs that are expected to be placed in-service in 2023 through 2025.
Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Operating expenditures includes spend on wildfire mitigation. Expenditures for these items totaled $135 million in 2022, $54 million in 2021 and $28 million in 2020, and planned spending totals $90 million in 2023, $124 million in 2024 and $127 million in 2025. The remaining investments primarily relate to expenditures for new connections and distribution operations.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Transmission growth investments primarily reflects costs associated with Energy Gateway Transmission projects. Expenditures for these projects totaled $944 million for 2022, $94 million for 2021 and $56 million for 2020. Forecast expenditures for Energy Gateway projects include planned costs for the following Energy Gateway Transmission segments:
416-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Aeolus substation near Medicine Bow, Wyoming and the Clover substation near Mona, Utah;
59-mile, 230-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Windstar substation near Glenrock, Wyoming and the Aeolus substation;
290-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line from the Longhorn substation near Boardman, Oregon to the Hemingway substation near Boise, Idaho;
14-mile, 345-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Oquirrh substation in the Salt Lake Valley and the Terminal substation near the Salt Lake City Airport;
40-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Limber substation in central Utah and the Terminal substation; and
195-mile, 500-kV high-voltage transmission line between the Anticline substation near Point of Rocks, Wyoming and the Populus substation in Downey, Idaho.
Planned spending for these Energy Gateway Transmission segments that are expected to be placed in-service in 2024 through 2028 totals $1,005 million in 2023, $661 million in 2024 and $763 million in 2025. The remaining investments primarily relate to expenditures for transmission operations, including wildfire mitigation, generation interconnection requests and other Energy Gateway Transmission segments.
Solar generation includes growth projects. Planned spending for the construction of new solar projects will add approximately 377 MWs of new generation and are expected to be placed in-service in 2026.
Electric battery and pumped hydro storage includes growth projects. Planned spending for the construction of storage projects from 2023 through 2025 includes $319 million for battery storage projects providing approximately 419 MWs of storage that are expected to be placed in-service in 2026 and $79 million for the construction of 38 MWs of new pumped hydro storage on the North Umpqua River system expected to be placed in-service in 2024 and 2026. The remaining investments relate to planned spending on projects that are expected to be placed in-service beyond 2026.
Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Expenditures for information technology totaled $155 million in 2022, $108 million in 2021 and $75 million for 2020. Planned information technology spending totals $224 million in 2023, $181 million in 2024 and $232 million in 2025. The remaining investments relate to operating projects that consist of routine expenditures for generation and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.
190



Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

From time to time, PacifiCorp enters into arrangements in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties that involve guarantees or similar arrangements. PacifiCorp currently has indemnification obligations in connection with the sale or transfer of certain assets. In addition, PacifiCorp evaluates potential obligations that arise out of variable interests in unconsolidated entities, determined in accordance with authoritative accounting guidance. PacifiCorp believes that the likelihood that it would be required to perform or otherwise incur any significant losses associated with any of these obligations is remote. Refer to Notes 11 and 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for more information on these obligations and arrangements.

Material Cash Requirements

PacifiCorp has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise primarily from long-term debt (refer to Note 8), certain commitments and contingencies (refer to Note 14), cost of removal and AROs (refer to Notes 6 and 11). Refer to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

PacifiCorp has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $8.0 billion on long-term debt, including $449 million due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters

PacifiCorp is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding PacifiCorp's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

PacifiCorp is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, water quality, emissions performance standards, coal ash disposal, wildfire prevention and mitigation and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact PacifiCorp's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. PacifiCorp believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and PacifiCorp is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt and preferred securities of PacifiCorp are rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of PacifiCorp's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt or preferred securities. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time. As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

PacifiCorp has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. PacifiCorp's unsecured revolving credit facilities do not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level to draw upon their availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facilities are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities. Certain authorizations or exemptions by regulatory commissions for the issuance of securities are valid as long as PacifiCorp maintains investment grade ratings on senior secured debt. A downgrade below that level would necessitate new regulatory applications and approvals.

191


In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in PacifiCorp's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp would have been required to post $433 million of additional collateral. PacifiCorp's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, outstanding accounts payable and receivable or other factors. Refer to Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of PacifiCorp's collateral requirements specific to PacifiCorp's derivative contracts.

Inflation

PacifiCorp operates under a cost-of-service based rate-setting structure administered by various state commissions and the FERC. Under this rate-setting structure, PacifiCorp is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation. PacifiCorp seeks to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of energy and other cost adjustment clauses and tariff riders, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and entering into contracts with fixed pricing where possible by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by PacifiCorp's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with PacifiCorp's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

PacifiCorp prepares its financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, PacifiCorp defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in rates occur.

PacifiCorp continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit PacifiCorp's ability to recover its costs. PacifiCorp believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $1.9 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $2.9 billion as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's regulatory assets and liabilities.

192


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits

PacifiCorp sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans as described in Note 10. PacifiCorp recognizes the funded status of these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Funded status is the fair value of plan assets minus the benefit obligation as of the measurement date. As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp recognized a net asset totaling $57 million for the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As of December 31, 2022, amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost included in net regulatory assets and accumulated other comprehensive loss totaled $255 million and $12 million, respectively.

The expense and benefit obligations relating to these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are based on actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. These key assumptions are reviewed annually and modified as appropriate. PacifiCorp believes that the key assumptions utilized in recording obligations under the plans are reasonable based on prior plan experience and current market and economic conditions. Refer to Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosures about PacifiCorp's defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the key assumptions used to calculate the funded status and net periodic benefit cost for these plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022.

PacifiCorp chooses a discount rate based upon high quality debt security investment yields in effect as of the measurement date with cash flows aligning to the expected timing and amount of plan liabilities.

In establishing its assumption as to the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, PacifiCorp evaluates the investment allocation between return-seeking investment and fixed income securities based on the funded status of the plan and utilizes the asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on forward-looking views of the financial markets and historical performance. Pension and other postretirement benefits expense increases as the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets decreases. PacifiCorp regularly reviews its actual asset allocations and rebalances its investments to its targeted allocations when considered appropriate.

The key assumptions used may differ materially from period to period due to changing market and economic conditions. These differences may result in a significant impact to pension and other postretirement benefits expense and funded status. If changes were to occur for the following key assumptions, the approximate effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements would be as follows (in millions):
Other Postretirement
Pension PlansBenefit Plan
+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%
Effect on December 31, 2022 Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate$(25)$26 $(8)$
Effect on 2022 Periodic Cost:
Discount rate$$(1)$$(1)
Expected rate of return on plan assets(5)(2)

A variety of factors affect the funded status of the plans, including asset returns, discount rates, mortality assumptions, plan changes and PacifiCorp's funding policy for each plan.

193


Income Taxes

In determining PacifiCorp's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by PacifiCorp's various regulatory commissions. PacifiCorp's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. PacifiCorp recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of PacifiCorp's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, PacifiCorp believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results. Refer to Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's income taxes.

It is probable that PacifiCorp will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to customers in certain state jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $1.2 billion and will primarily be included in regulated rates over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.

Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue

Revenue is recognized as electricity is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $301 million as of December 31, 2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month and actual revenue is recorded based on subsequent meter readings.

Wildfire Loss Contingencies

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, PacifiCorp is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the wildfires. In determining this exposure, PacifiCorp is required to assess whether the likelihood of loss for each of the wildfires and lawsuits is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with various parties. If deemed reasonably possible, PacifiCorp is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts. If deemed probable, PacifiCorp is required to accrue a loss if reasonably estimable based on the bottom end of the range if no amount within the range of estimated loss is any better than another amount. Many assumptions and variables are involved in determining these estimates, including identifying the various categories of potential loss such as fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. Within the categories of potential loss, further assumptions are made regarding items such as the types of structures damaged, estimated replacement values associated with those structures, value of personal property, the types of natural resource damage such as timber, the value of that timber, the nature of noneconomic damages such as those arising from personal injuries, other damages PacifiCorp may be responsible for if found negligent such as punitive damages, and the amount of any penalties or fines that may be imposed by governmental entities. Refer to Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's loss contingencies associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney fire.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

PacifiCorp's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. PacifiCorp's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which PacifiCorp transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with PacifiCorp's business activities. PacifiCorp has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Notes 2 and 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding PacifiCorp's contracts accounted for as derivatives.
194



PacifiCorp has a risk management committee that is responsible for the oversight of market and credit risk relating to the commodity transactions of PacifiCorp. To limit PacifiCorp's exposure to market and credit risk, the risk management committee recommends, and executive management establishes, policies, limits and approved products, which are reviewed frequently to respond to changing market conditions.

Risk is an inherent part of PacifiCorp's business and activities. PacifiCorp has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the various types of risk involved in PacifiCorp's business. The risk management policy governs energy transactions and is designed for hedging PacifiCorp's existing energy and asset exposures, and to a limited extent, the policy permits arbitrage and trading activities to take advantage of market inefficiencies. The policy also governs the types of transactions authorized for use and establishes guidelines for credit risk management and management information systems required to effectively monitor such transactions. PacifiCorp's risk management policy provides for the use of only those contracts that have a similar volume or price relationship to its portfolio of assets, liabilities or anticipated transactions.

Commodity Price Risk

PacifiCorp is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk as PacifiCorp has an obligation to serve retail customer load in its service territories. PacifiCorp's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. PacifiCorp does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, PacifiCorp uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. PacifiCorp does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. PacifiCorp's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in rates, which is subject to regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.
PacifiCorp measures, monitors and manages the market risk in its electricity and natural gas portfolio in comparison to established thresholds and measures its open positions subject to price risk in terms of quantity at each delivery location for each forward time period. PacifiCorp has a risk management policy that requires increasing volumes of hedge transactions over a three-year position management and hedging horizon to reduce market risk of its electricity and natural gas portfolio.

PacifiCorp maintained compliance with its risk management policy and limit procedures during the year ended December 31, 2022.

The table that follows summarizes PacifiCorp's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives, excluding collateral netting of $(78) million and $5 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worst case scenarios (dollars in millions):
Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
 Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$270 $381 $159 
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$53 $104 $

195


PacifiCorp's commodity derivative contracts are generally recoverable from customers in rates; therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose PacifiCorp to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a regulatory liability of $270 million and $53 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative asset of $270 million and $53 million, respectively. Consolidated financial results would be negatively impacted if the costs of wholesale electricity, natural gas or fuel are higher or the level of wholesale electricity sales are lower than what is included in rates, including the impacts of adjustment mechanisms.

Interest Rate Risk

PacifiCorp is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. PacifiCorp manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, PacifiCorp's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose PacifiCorp to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if PacifiCorp were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. PacifiCorp has the ability to enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate PacifiCorp's exposure to interest rate risk. The nature and amount of PacifiCorp's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 7, 8 and 13 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of PacifiCorp's short- and long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $218 million that expose PacifiCorp to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. The market risk related to PacifiCorp's variable-rate debt as of December 31, 2022 is not hedged. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on PacifiCorp's consolidated annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Credit Risk

PacifiCorp is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent PacifiCorp's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, PacifiCorp analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, PacifiCorp enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, PacifiCorp exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp's aggregate credit exposure with wholesale energy supply and marketing counterparties included counterparties having non-investment grade, internally rated credit ratings. Substantially all of these non-investment grade, internally rated counterparties are associated with long-duration solar and wind power purchase agreements, some of which are from facilities that have not yet achieved commercial operation and for which PacifiCorp has no obligation should the facilities not achieve commercial operation.

196


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

197


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of PacifiCorp

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PacifiCorp and subsidiaries ("PacifiCorp") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of PacifiCorp as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of PacifiCorp's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on PacifiCorp's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to PacifiCorp in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. PacifiCorp is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of PacifiCorp's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

PacifiCorp is subject to rate regulation by state public service commissions as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where PacifiCorp operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

198


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow PacifiCorp an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While PacifiCorp has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit PacifiCorp's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, and (3) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated PacifiCorp's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected PacifiCorp's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.

Wildfires – Contingencies – Refer to Note 14 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

As a result of several wildfires that have occurred in PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas in Oregon and California, PacifiCorp is required to evaluate its exposure to potential loss contingencies arising from claims associated with the 2020 Wildfires and the 2022 McKinney Fire (the "Wildfires"). In determining this exposure, PacifiCorp is required to determine whether the likelihood of loss for each of the Wildfires is remote, reasonably possible or probable, which involves complex judgments based on several variables including available information regarding the cause and origin of the Wildfires, investigations, discovery associated with lawsuits and negotiations with claimants.

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If deemed reasonably possible, PacifiCorp is required to estimate the potential loss or range of potential loss and disclose any material amounts.

Management has recorded estimated liabilities of $424 million and receivables of $246 million, which represent its best estimate of probable losses and expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, PacifiCorp recognized probable losses net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively. Management has disclosed reasonably possible estimated losses of $31 million, net of potential insurance recoveries of $103 million, associated with the 2022 McKinney Fire.

199


We identified wildfire-related contingencies and the related disclosures as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to determine the probability of loss and estimate the probable or reasonably possible losses and insurance recoveries. This required the application of a high degree of judgment and extensive effort when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management's judgments, estimates and disclosures related to wildfire-related loss contingencies.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to management's judgments regarding the probability of loss, estimated losses and insurance recoveries, and related disclosures for wildfire-related contingencies included the following, among others:
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether a loss was probable or reasonably possible for the Wildfires by inquiring of management and PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding the likelihood and amounts of probable and reasonably possible losses, including the potential impact of information gained through investigations into the cause of the fires, information from claimants, the advice of legal counsel, and reading external information for any evidence that might contradict management's assertions.
We evaluated the estimation methodology for determining the amount of probable and reasonably possible losses through inquiries with management and external and internal legal counsel, and we tested the significant assumptions used in the estimates of probable and reasonably possible losses.
We read legal letters from PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding known information and evaluated whether the information therein was consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.
We evaluated management's judgments related to whether related insurance recoveries were probable of collection by inquiring of management and PacifiCorp's external and internal legal counsel regarding the amounts of insurance recoveries recorded or disclosed. With the assistance of our insurance specialists, we tested the significant assumptions used in the determination of collectability, including obtaining and reading related policies to determine whether the types of insurance claims are included or excluded from coverage.
We evaluated whether PacifiCorp's disclosures were appropriate and consistent with the information obtained in our procedures.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Portland, Oregon
February 24, 2023

We have served as PacifiCorp's auditor since 2006.

200


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$641 $179 
Trade receivables, net825 725 
Other receivables, net72 52 
Inventories474 474 
Derivative contracts184 76 
Regulatory assets275 65 
Other current assets213 150 
Total current assets2,684 1,721 
Property, plant and equipment, net24,430 22,914 
Regulatory assets1,605 1,287 
Other assets686 534 
Total assets$29,405 $26,456 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


201


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$1,049 $680 
Accrued interest128 121 
Accrued property, income and other taxes67 78 
Accrued employee expenses86 89 
Current portion of long-term debt449 155 
Regulatory liabilities96 118 
Other current liabilities271 219 
Total current liabilities2,146 1,460 
Long-term debt9,217 8,575 
Regulatory liabilities2,843 2,650 
Deferred income taxes3,152 2,847 
Other long-term liabilities1,306 1,011 
Total liabilities18,664 16,543 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock
Common stock - 750 shares authorized, no par value, 357 shares issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital4,479 4,479 
Retained earnings6,269 5,449 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(9)(17)
Total shareholders' equity10,741 9,913 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity$29,405 $26,456 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

202


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $5,341 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy1,979 1,831 1,790 
Operations and maintenance1,227 1,031 1,209 
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 1,209 
Property and other taxes195 213 209 
Total operating expenses4,521 4,163 4,417 
Operating income1,158 1,133 924 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(431)(430)(426)
Allowance for borrowed funds31 24 48 
Allowance for equity funds71 50 98 
Interest and dividend income44 24 10 
Other, net(15)10 
Total other income (expense)(300)(324)(260)
Income before income tax benefit858 809 664 
Income tax benefit(62)(79)(75)
Net income$920 $888 $739 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

203


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income$920 $888 $739 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax —
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $3, $1 and $(1)(3)
Comprehensive income$928 $890 $736 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

204


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)
Accumulated
AdditionalOtherTotal
PreferredCommonPaid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholders'
StockStockCapitalEarningsLoss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 2019$$— $4,479 $3,972 $(16)$8,437 
Net income— — — 739 — 739 
Other comprehensive loss— — — — (3)(3)
Balance, December 31, 2020— 4,479 4,711 (19)9,173 
Net income— — — 888 — 888 
Other comprehensive income— — — — 
Common stock dividends declared— — — (150)— (150)
Balance, December 31, 2021— 4,479 5,449 (17)9,913 
Net income— — — 920 — 920 
Other comprehensive income— — — — 
Common stock dividends declared— — — (100)— (100)
Balance, December 31, 2022$$— $4,479 $6,269 $(9)$10,741 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

205


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$920 $888 $739 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating
activities:
Depreciation and amortization1,120 1,088 1,209 
Allowance for equity funds(71)(50)(98)
Net power cost deferrals(482)(159)(1)
Amortization of net power cost deferrals100 67 50 
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(162)(97)(278)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits157 64 (124)
Other, net13 (5)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables, other receivables and other assets(264)17 (169)
Inventories— (88)
Derivative collateral, net95 19 23 
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net(46)(37)(53)
Accounts payable and other liabilities439 372 
Net cash flows from operating activities1,819 1,804 1,583 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(2,166)(1,513)(2,540)
Other, net12 30 
Net cash flows from investing activities(2,161)(1,501)(2,510)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt1,087 984 987 
Repayments of long-term debt(155)(870)(38)
(Repayments of) net proceeds from short-term debt— (93)(37)
Dividends paid(100)(150)— 
Other, net(2)(7)(2)
Net cash flows from financing activities830 (136)910 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents488 167 (17)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period186 19 36 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$674 $186 $19 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

206


PACIFICORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)Organization and Operations

PacifiCorp, which includes PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries, is a U.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial, industrial, irrigation and other customers in portions of Utah, Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, Idaho and California. PacifiCorp owns, or has interests in, a number of thermal, hydroelectric, wind-powered and geothermal generating facilities, as well as electric transmission and distribution assets. PacifiCorp also buys and sells electricity on the wholesale market with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. PacifiCorp is subject to comprehensive state and federal regulation. PacifiCorp's subsidiaries support its electric utility operations by providing coal mining services. PacifiCorp is an indirect subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"), a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").

(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for loss contingencies and applicable insurance recoveries, including those related to the Oregon and Northern California 2020 wildfires (the "2020 Wildfires") and the 2022 McKinney fire described in Note 14. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

PacifiCorp prepares its financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, PacifiCorp defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in rates occur.

If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

207


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist substantially of funds representing vendor retention, custodial and nuclear decommissioning funds. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$641 $179 
Restricted cash included in other current assets
Restricted cash included in other assets26 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$674 $186 

Investments

Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with realized gains and losses, as determined on a specific identification basis, recognized in earnings and unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI, net of tax. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had no unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities. Trading securities are carried at fair value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in earnings.

Equity Method Investments

PacifiCorp utilizes the equity method of accounting with respect to investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when an investor possesses more than 20% of the voting interests of the investee. This presumption may be overcome based on specific facts and circumstances that demonstrate that the ability to exercise significant influence is restricted. In applying the equity method, PacifiCorp records the investment at cost and subsequently increases or decreases the carrying value of the investment by PacifiCorp's proportionate share of the net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI") of the investee. PacifiCorp records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination, and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on PacifiCorp's assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to PacifiCorp by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, PacifiCorp primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, PacifiCorp may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. The change in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$18 $17 $
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net18 13 18 
Write-offs, net(17)(12)(9)
Ending balance$19 $18 $17 

208


Derivatives

PacifiCorp employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage price risk for electricity, natural gas and other commodities and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.

Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked-to-market and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of fuel and energy on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For PacifiCorp's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in rates are recorded as regulatory liabilities or assets. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.

Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of materials, supplies and fuel stocks and are stated at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. PacifiCorp capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs, which include debt and equity allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"). The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed.

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed on the straight-line method based on composite asset class lives prescribed by PacifiCorp's various regulatory authorities or over the assets' estimated useful lives. Depreciation studies are completed periodically to determine the appropriate composite asset class lives, net salvage and depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the various regulatory authorities. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

Generally when PacifiCorp retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represents the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of property, plant and equipment, is capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, PacifiCorp is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.

209


Asset Retirement Obligations

PacifiCorp recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. PacifiCorp's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.

Impairment

PacifiCorp evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Substantially all property, plant and equipment supports PacifiCorp's regulated operations, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

Leases

PacifiCorp has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for land, office space, office equipment, and generating facilities and finance leases consisting primarily of office buildings, natural gas pipeline facilities, and generating facilities. These leases generally require PacifiCorp to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. PacifiCorp does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating PacifiCorp is reasonably certain to exercise the option. PacifiCorp's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Right-of-use assets will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

PacifiCorp's leases of generating facilities generally are in the form of long-term purchases of electricity, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

PacifiCorp's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

PacifiCorp uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which PacifiCorp expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. PacifiCorp records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Substantially all of PacifiCorp's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission and distribution and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 815, "Derivatives and Hedging."
210


Revenue recognized is equal to what PacifiCorp has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of PacifiCorp's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $301 million and $264 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued.

Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Debt Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes

Berkshire Hathaway includes PacifiCorp in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, PacifiCorp's provision for income taxes has been computed on a stand-alone basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of OCI are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that PacifiCorp deems probable to be passed on to its customers in most state jurisdictions are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse or as otherwise approved by PacifiCorp's various regulatory commissions. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties or as prescribed by various regulatory commissions.

PacifiCorp recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. PacifiCorp's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Segment Information

PacifiCorp currently has one segment, which includes its regulated electric utility operations.

211


(3)Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility Plant:
Generation15 - 59 years$13,726 $13,679 
Transmission60 - 90 years8,051 7,894 
Distribution20 - 75 years8,477 8,044 
Intangible plant(1) and other
5 - 75 years2,755 2,645 
Utility plant in-service33,009 32,262 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(11,093)(10,507)
Utility plant in-service, net21,916 21,755 
Nonregulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization14 - 95 years18 18 
21,934 21,773 
Construction work-in-progress2,496 1,141 
Property, plant and equipment, net$24,430 $22,914 

(1)Computer software costs included in intangible plant are initially assigned a depreciable life of 5 to 10 years.

The average depreciation and amortization rate applied to depreciable property, plant and equipment was 3.5%, 3.5% and 4.1% for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Unallocated Acquisition Adjustments

PacifiCorp has unallocated acquisition adjustments that represent the excess of costs of the acquired interests in property, plant and equipment purchased from the entity that first dedicated the assets to utility service over their net book value in those assets. These unallocated acquisition adjustments included in other property, plant and equipment had an original cost of $156 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and accumulated depreciation of $144 million and $143 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

(4)Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements with other utilities, PacifiCorp, as a tenant in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation, transmission and distribution facilities. PacifiCorp accounts for its proportionate share of each facility, and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include PacifiCorp's share of the expenses of these facilities.

212


The amounts shown in the table below represent PacifiCorp's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):
FacilityAccumulatedConstruction
PacifiCorpinDepreciation andWork-in-
ShareServiceAmortizationProgress
Jim Bridger Nos. 1 - 467 %$1,529 $914 $39 
Hunter No. 194 517 227 
Hunter No. 260 305 148 
Wyodak80 491 273 
Colstrip Nos. 3 and 410 262 178 — 
Hermiston50 189 106 — 
Craig Nos. 1 and 219 372 331 — 
Hayden No. 125 77 52 — 
Hayden No. 213 44 31 — 
Transmission and distribution facilitiesVarious916 274 129 
Total$4,702 $2,534 $178 

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$11 $11 
Finance leases11 
Total right-of-use assets$20 $22 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$11 $11 
Finance leases11 12 
Total lease liabilities$22 $23 

213


The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Variable$61 $56 $60 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization
Interest
Short-term
Total lease costs$71 $69 $68 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases11.412.713.9
Finance leases9.710.18.4
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases3.9 %3.7 %3.8 %
Finance leases11.4 %11.1 %10.5 %

Cash payments associated with operating and finance lease liabilities approximated lease cost for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

PacifiCorp has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$$
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter13 
Total undiscounted lease payments14 18 32 
Less - amounts representing interest(3)(7)(10)
Lease liabilities$11 $11 $22 

214


(6)Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. PacifiCorp's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life20222021
Employee benefit plans(1)
16 years$290 $286 
Utah mine disposition(2)
Various115 116 
Unamortized contract values1 year18 36 
Deferred net power costs2 years546 151 
Environmental costs30 years111 108 
Asset retirement obligation29 years275 241 
Demand side management (DSM)10 years224 211 
Wildfire mitigation and vegetation management costsVarious111 21 
OtherVarious190 182 
Total regulatory assets$1,880 $1,352 
Reflected as:
Current assets$275 $65 
Noncurrent assets1,605 1,287 
Total regulatory assets$1,880 $1,352 

(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in rates when recognized.
(2)Amounts represent regulatory assets established as a result of the Utah mine disposition in 2015 for the United Mine Workers of America ("UMWA") 1974 Pension Plan withdrawal and closure costs incurred to date considered probable of recovery.

PacifiCorp had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $1,200 million and $723 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

215


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent income to be recognized or amounts to be returned to customers in future periods. PacifiCorp's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Life20222021
Cost of removal(1)
26 years$1,332 $1,187 
Deferred income taxes(2)
Various1,164 1,307 
Unrealized gain on regulated derivatives1 year270 53 
OtherVarious173 221 
Total regulatory liabilities$2,939 $2,768 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$96 $118 
Noncurrent liabilities2,843 2,650 
Total regulatory liabilities$2,939 $2,768 

(1)Amounts represent estimated costs, as generally accrued through depreciation rates, of removing property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.
(2)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable of being passed on to customers, partially offset by income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's availability under its unsecured credit facility as of December 31 (in millions):
2022:
Credit facility$1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support and letters of credit(249)
Net credit facility$951 
2021:
Credit facility$1,200 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support(218)
Net credit facility$982 

As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp was in compliance with the covenants of its credit facility and letter of credit arrangements.

PacifiCorp has a $1.2 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which supports PacifiCorp's commercial paper program and certain series of its tax-exempt bond obligations and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at PacifiCorp's option, plus a spread that varies based on PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp did not have any commercial paper borrowings outstanding.

216


The credit facility requires that PacifiCorp's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.

In January 2023, PacifiCorp entered into an additional $800 million 364-day unsecured credit facility expiring in January 2024. No amounts are currently outstanding against this new credit facility.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp had $38 million and $19 million, respectively, of fully available letters of credit issued under committed arrangements outside of its credit facility in support of certain transactions required by third parties that generally have provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration dates for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

(8)Long-term Debt

PacifiCorp's long-term debt was as follows as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
20222021
AverageAverage
PrincipalCarryingInterestCarryingInterest
AmountValueRateValueRate
First mortgage bonds:
2.95% to 8.23%, due through 2026$1,224 $1,223 4.07 %$1,377 4.41 %
2.70% to 7.70%, due 2029 to 20311,100 1,095 4.35 1,094 4.35 
5.25% to 6.25%, due 2034 to 20372,050 2,042 5.90 2,042 5.90 
4.10% to 6.35%, due 2038 to 20421,250 1,239 5.63 1,238 5.63 
2.90% to 5.35%, due 2049 to 20533,900 3,849 4.03 2,761 3.52 
Variable-rate series, tax-exempt bond obligations (2022-3.75% to 4.10%; 2021-0.12% to 0.14%):
Due 202525 25 4.10 25 0.12 
Due 2024 to 2025(1)
193 193 3.81 193 0.13 
Total long-term debt$9,742 $9,666 $8,730 
Reflected as:
20222021
Current portion of long-term debt$449 $155 
Long-term debt9,217 8,575 
Total long-term debt$9,666 $8,730 

(1)Secured by pledged first mortgage bonds registered to and held by the tax-exempt bond trustee generally with the same interest rates, maturity dates and redemption provisions as the tax-exempt bond obligations.

In December 2022, PacifiCorp issued $1.1 billion of its 5.35% First Mortgage Bonds due December 2053. PacifiCorp intends within 24 months of the issuance date to allocate an amount equal to the net proceeds to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, new or existing investments or expenditures made in one or more eligible projects in alignment with BHE's Green Financing Framework. Proceeds will not knowingly be allocated to the same portion of a project that received allocation of proceeds under any other Green Financing Instrument; activities related to the exploration, production, transportation, or consumption of fossil fuels; or activities related to nuclear energy.

PacifiCorp's long-term debt generally includes provisions that allow PacifiCorp to redeem the first mortgage bonds in whole or in part at any time through the payment of a make-whole premium. Variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations are generally redeemable at par value.

217


PacifiCorp currently has regulatory authority from the Oregon Public Utility Commission and the Idaho Public Utilities Commission to issue an additional $900 million of long-term debt. PacifiCorp must make a notice filing with the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission prior to any future issuance. PacifiCorp currently has an effective shelf registration statement filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to issue an indeterminate amount of first mortgage bonds through September 2023.

The issuance of PacifiCorp's first mortgage bonds is limited by available property, earnings tests and other provisions of PacifiCorp's mortgage. Approximately $33 billion of PacifiCorp's eligible property (based on original cost) was subject to the lien of the mortgage as of December 31, 2022.

As of December 31, 2022, the annual principal maturities of long-term debt for 2023 and thereafter are as follows (in millions):
Long-term
Debt
2023$449 
2024591 
2025302 
2026100 
2027— 
Thereafter8,300 
Total9,742 
Unamortized discount and debt issuance costs(76)
Total$9,666 

(9)Income Taxes

Income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
2022 20212020
Current:
Federal$(216)$(150)$19 
State(3)30 
Total(219)(143)49 
Deferred:
Federal90 26 (124)
State71 40 
Total161 66 (123)
Investment tax credits(4)(2)(1)
Total income tax (benefit) expense$(62)$(79)$(75)

218


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
Effects of ratemaking(12)(14)(22)
Federal income tax credits(22)(20)(13)
Valuation allowance— — 
Other— — 
Effective income tax rate(7)%(10)%(11)%

Income tax credits relate primarily to production tax credits ("PTC") earned by PacifiCorp's wind-powered generating facilities. Federal renewable electricity PTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-powered generating facilities is produced and sold and are based on a per-kilowatt hour rate pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law. Wind-powered generating facilities are eligible for the credits for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in-service. PTCs for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 totaled $185 million, $164 million and $89 million, respectively.

Effects of ratemaking is primarily attributable to activity associated with excess deferred income taxes. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $102 million for 2022. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $112 million for 2021, including the use of $4 million to amortize certain regulatory balances in Wyoming and Idaho. Excess deferred income tax amortization, net of deferrals, was $132 million for 2020, including the use of $118 million to accelerate depreciation of certain retired equipment and to amortize certain regulatory balances in Idaho, Oregon and Utah.

The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Deferred income tax assets:
Regulatory liabilities$724 $682 
Employee benefits59 68 
State carryforwards73 73 
Loss contingencies107 63 
Asset retirement obligations79 73 
Other80 88 
  Total deferred income tax assets1,122 1,047 
Valuation allowances(35)(15)
Total deferred income tax assets, net1,087 1,032 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property, plant and equipment(3,612)(3,468)
Regulatory assets(462)(332)
Other(165)(79)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(4,239)(3,879)
Net deferred income tax liability$(3,152)$(2,847)

219


The following table provides, without regard to valuation allowances, PacifiCorp's net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and expiration dates as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
State
Net operating loss carryforwards$1,159 
Deferred income taxes on net operating loss carryforwards$53 
Expiration dates2023 - indefinite
Tax credit carryforwards$20 
Expiration dates2023 - indefinite

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of PacifiCorp's income tax returns through December 31, 2013. The statute of limitations for PacifiCorp's income tax returns have expired for certain states through December 31, 2011, and for Idaho through December 31, 2018, except for the impact of any federal audit adjustments. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, for state filings may not preclude the state from adjusting the state net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans

PacifiCorp sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans that cover certain of its employees, as well as a defined contribution 401(k) employee savings plan ("401(k) Plan"). In addition, PacifiCorp contributes to a joint trustee pension plan and a subsidiary previously contributed to a multiemployer pension plan for benefits offered to certain bargaining units.

Defined Benefit Plans

PacifiCorp's pension plans include non-contributory defined benefit pension plans, collectively the PacifiCorp Retirement Plan ("Retirement Plan"), and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP"). The Retirement Plan is closed to all non-union employees hired after January 1, 2008. All non-union Retirement Plan participants hired prior to January 1, 2008 that did not elect to receive equivalent fixed contributions to the 401(k) Plan effective January 1, 2009 earned benefits based on a cash balance formula through December 31, 2016. Effective January 1, 2017, non-union employee participants with a cash balance benefit in the Retirement Plan are no longer eligible to receive pay credits in their cash balance formula. In general for union employees, benefits under the Retirement Plan were frozen at various dates from December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2011 as they are now being provided with enhanced 401(k) Plan benefits. However, certain limited union Retirement Plan participants continue to earn benefits under the Retirement Plan based on the employee's years of service and a final average pay formula. The SERP was closed to new participants as of March 21, 2006 and froze future accruals for active participants as of December 31, 2014.

PacifiCorp's other postretirement benefit plan provides healthcare and life insurance benefits to eligible retirees.

Pension Settlement

Pension settlement accounting was triggered in 2022 and 2021 as a result of the amount of lump sum distributions in the Retirement Plan exceeding the service and interest cost threshold. The 2021 pension settlement accounting included an interim July 31, 2021 remeasurement of the pension plan assets and projected benefit obligation. As a result of the settlement accounting, PacifiCorp recognized settlement losses of $6 million, net of regulatory deferrals during each of the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

For purposes of calculating the expected return on plan assets, a market-related value is used. The market-related value of plan assets is calculated by spreading the difference between expected and actual investment returns over a five-year period beginning after the first year in which they occur.

220


Net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the plans included the following components for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Service cost$— $— $— $$$
Interest cost29 29 36 
Expected return on plan assets(42)(51)(56)(11)(9)(14)
Settlement(1)
— — — — 
Net amortization16 21 18 
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)$$$(2)$— $$— 

(1)Pension amounts represent settlement losses of $24 million and $15 million net of deferrals of $18 million and $9 million during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Funded Status

The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$1,058 $1,064 $324 $327 
Employer contributions(1)
— 
Participant contributions— — 
Actual (loss) return on plan assets(172)109 (42)14 
Settlement(2)
(67)(52)— — 
Benefits paid(65)(68)(23)(24)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$758 $1,058 $264 $324 

(1)Pension amounts represent employer contributions to the SERP.
(2)Benefits paid in the form of lump sum distributions that gave rise to the settlement accounting described above.

The following table is a reconciliation of the benefit obligations for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$1,048 $1,202 $288 $307 
Service cost— — 
Interest cost29 29 
Participant contributions— — 
Actuarial gain(199)(63)(61)(10)
Settlement(1)
(67)(52)— — 
Benefits paid(65)(68)(23)(24)
Benefit obligation, end of year$746 $1,048 $219 $288 
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$746 $1,048 

(1)Benefits paid in the form of lump sum distributions that gave rise to the settlement accounting described above.

221


The funded status of the plans and the amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$758 $1,058 $264 $324 
Less - Benefit obligation, end of year746 1,048 219 288 
Funded status$12 $10 $45 $36 
Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
Other assets$53 $63 $45 $36 
Accrued employee expenses(4)(4)— — 
Other long-term liabilities(37)(49)— — 
Amounts recognized$12 $10 $45 $36 

The SERP has no plan assets; however, PacifiCorp has a Rabbi trust that holds corporate-owned life insurance and other investments to provide funding for the future cash requirements of the SERP. The cash surrender value of all of the policies included in the Rabbi trust, net of amounts borrowed against the cash surrender value, plus the fair market value of other Rabbi trust investments, was $61 million and $69 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. These assets are not included in the plan assets in the above table, but are reflected in noncurrent other assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The projected and accumulated benefit obligations for the SERP were $42 million and $54 million at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

As of December 31, 2022, the fair value of the plan assets for the Retirement Plan was in excess of both the projected benefit obligation and the accumulated benefit obligation.

Unrecognized Amounts

The portion of the funded status of the plans not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost as of December 31 is as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Net loss (gain)$273 $298 $(36)$(28)
Regulatory deferrals(1)
29 11 
Total$302 $309 $(35)$(26)

(1)Pension amounts represent the unamortized portion of deferred settlement losses.

222


A reconciliation of the amounts not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 is as follows (in millions):
Accumulated
Other
RegulatoryComprehensive
AssetLossTotal
Pension
Balance, December 31, 2020$432 $25 $457 
Net gain arising during the year(120)(1)(121)
Net amortization(20)(1)(21)
Settlement(6)— (6)
Total(146)(2)(148)
Balance, December 31, 2021286 23 309 
Net loss (gain) arising during the year24 (9)15 
Net amortization(14)(2)(16)
Settlement(6)— (6)
Total(11)(7)
Balance, December 31, 2022$290 $12 $302 

Regulatory
Liability
Other Postretirement
Balance, December 31, 2020$(10)
Net gain arising during the year(15)
Net amortization(1)
Total(16)
Balance, December 31, 2021(26)
Net gain arising during the year(8)
Net amortization(1)
Total(9)
Balance, December 31, 2022$(35)

223


Plan Assumptions

Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Benefit obligations as of December 31:
Discount rate5.55 %2.90 %2.50 %5.50 %2.90 %2.50 %
Rate of compensation increaseN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan - non-union
2020N/AN/A2.27 %N/AN/AN/A
2021N/A0.82 %0.82 %N/AN/AN/A
20220.88 %0.88 %0.82 %N/AN/AN/A
20234.73 %0.88 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
20244.73 %1.90 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
2025 and beyond2.60 %1.90 %2.00 %N/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan - union
2020N/AN/A2.16 %N/AN/AN/A
2021N/A1.42 %1.42 %N/AN/AN/A
20221.94 %1.94 %1.42 %N/AN/AN/A
20233.55 %1.94 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
20243.55 %2.30 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
2025 and beyond2.40 %2.30 %2.40 %N/AN/AN/A
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Discount rate2.90 %2.50 %3.25 %2.90 %2.50 %3.20 %
Expected return on plan assets4.70 6.00 6.50 3.44 2.90 4.92 

In establishing its assumption as to the expected return on plan assets, PacifiCorp utilizes the asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets.

As a result of a plan amendment effective on January 1, 2017, the benefit obligation for the Retirement Plan is no longer affected by future increases in compensation. As a result of a labor settlement reached with UMWA in December 2014, the benefit obligation for the other postretirement plan is no longer affected by healthcare cost trends.

Contributions and Benefit Payments

Employer contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are expected to be $4 million and $— million, respectively, during 2023. Funding to PacifiCorp's Retirement Plan trust is based upon the actuarially determined costs of the plan and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA") and the Pension Protection Act of 2006, as amended ("PPA of 2006"). PacifiCorp considers contributing additional amounts from time to time in order to achieve certain funding levels specified under the PPA of 2006. PacifiCorp evaluates a variety of factors, including funded status, income tax laws and regulatory requirements, in determining contributions to its other postretirement benefit plan.

224


The expected benefit payments to participants in PacifiCorp's pension and other postretirement benefit plans for 2023 through 2027 and for the five years thereafter are summarized below (in millions):
Projected Benefit Payments
PensionOther Postretirement
2023$76 $23 
202473 22 
202570 21 
202667 20 
202764 20 
2028-2032277 87 

Plan Assets

Investment Policy and Asset Allocations

PacifiCorp's investment policy for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans is to balance risk and return through a diversified portfolio of debt securities, equity securities and other alternative investments. Maturities for debt securities are managed to targets consistent with prudent risk tolerances. The plans retain outside investment consultants to advise on plan investments within the parameters outlined by the Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company Investment Committee. The investment portfolio is managed in line with the investment policy with sufficient liquidity to meet near-term benefit payments.

In 2020, the assets of the PacifiCorp Master Retirement Trust were transferred into the BHE Master Retirement Trust.

The target allocations (percentage of plan assets) for PacifiCorp's pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets are as follows as of December 31, 2022:
Pension(1)
Other Postretirement(1)
%%
Debt securities(2)
7377
Equity securities(2)
2223
Other50

(1)The trust in which the PacifiCorp Retirement Plan is invested includes a separate account that is used to fund benefits for the other postretirement benefit plan. In addition to this separate account, the assets for the other postretirement benefit plan are held in Voluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association ("VEBA") trusts, each of which has its own investment allocation strategies. Target allocations for the other postretirement benefit plan include the separate account of the Retirement Plan trust and the VEBA trusts.
(2)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds are allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.

225


Fair Value Measurements

The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for PacifiCorp's defined benefit pension plan (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash equivalents$— $10 $— $10 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations41 — — 41 
Corporate obligations— 211 — 211 
Municipal obligations— 15 — 15 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 34 — 34 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies69 — — 69 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$110 $270 $— $380 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
346 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
32 
Investments at fair value$758 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash equivalents$— $15 $— $15 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations51 — — 51 
Corporate obligations— 299 — 299 
Municipal obligations— 22 — 22 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 38 — 38 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies61 — — 61 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$112 $374 $— $486 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
538 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
34 
Investments at fair value$1,058 

(1)Refer to Note 13 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)Investment funds are substantially comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 50% and 50%, respectively, for 2022 and 59% and 41%, respectively, for 2021, and are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 90% and 10%, respectively, for 2022 and 84% and 16%, respectively, for 2021.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate.

226


The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for PacifiCorp's defined benefit other postretirement plan (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1(1)
Level 2(1)
Level 3(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash and cash equivalents$$$— $10 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations— — 
Corporate obligations— 49 — 49 
Municipal obligations— 13 — 13 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 47 — 47 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies— — 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$18 $114 $— 132 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
132 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
— 
Investments at fair value$264 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash and cash equivalents$$$— $
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations24 — — 24 
Corporate obligations— 79 — 79 
Municipal obligations— 15 — 15 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 35 — 35 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies— — 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$32 $130 $— 162 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
161 
Limited partnership interests(3) measured at net asset value
Investments at fair value$324 

(1)Refer to Note 13 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)Investment funds are substantially comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 41% and 59%, respectively, for 2022 and 39% and 61%, respectively, for 2021, and are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 91% and 9%, respectively, for 2022 and 90% and 10%, respectively, for 2021.
(3)Limited partnership interests include several funds that invest primarily in real estate, buyout, growth equity and venture capital.

For level 1 investments, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value. For level 2 investments, the fair value is determined using pricing models based on observable market inputs. Shares of mutual funds not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, private equity limited partnership interests, common and commingled trust funds and investment entities are reported at fair value based on the net asset value per unit, which is used for expedience purposes. A fund's net asset value is based on the fair value of the underlying assets held by the fund less its liabilities.

Multiemployer and Joint Trustee Pension Plans

PacifiCorp contributes to the PacifiCorp/IBEW Local 57 Retirement Trust Fund ("Local 57 Trust Fund") (plan number 001) and its subsidiary, Energy West Mining Company, previously contributed to the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan (plan number 002). Contributions to these pension plans are based on the terms of collective bargaining agreements.

227


As a result of the Utah Mine Disposition and UMWA labor settlement, PacifiCorp's subsidiary, Energy West Mining Company, triggered involuntary withdrawal from the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan in June 2015 when the UMWA employees ceased performing work for the subsidiary. PacifiCorp recorded its estimate of the withdrawal obligation in December 2014 when withdrawal was considered probable and deferred the portion of the obligation considered probable of recovery to a regulatory asset. PacifiCorp has subsequently revised its estimate due to changes in facts and circumstances for a withdrawal occurring by July 2015. As communicated in a letter received in August 2016, the plan trustees determined a withdrawal liability of $115 million. Energy West Mining Company began making installment payments in November 2016 and has the option to elect a lump sum payment to settle the withdrawal obligation. The ultimate amount paid by Energy West Mining Company to settle the obligation is dependent on a variety of factors, including the results of ongoing negotiations with the plan trustees.

The Local 57 Trust Fund is a joint trustee plan such that the board of trustees is represented by an equal number of trustees from PacifiCorp and the union. The Local 57 Trust Fund was established pursuant to the provisions of the Taft-Hartley Act and although formed with the ability for other employers to participate in the plan, there are no other employers that participate in this plan.

The risk of participating in multiemployer pension plans generally differs from single-employer plans in that assets are pooled such that contributions by one employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers and plan assets cannot revert to employers. If an employer ceases participation in the plan, the employer may be obligated to pay a withdrawal liability based on the participants' unfunded, vested benefits in the plan. This occurred as a result of Energy West Mining Company's withdrawal from the UMWA 1974 Pension Plan. If participating employers withdraw from a multiemployer plan, the unfunded obligations of the plan may be borne by the remaining participating employers.

The following table presents PacifiCorp's participation in individually significant joint trustee and multiemployer pension plans for the years ended December 31 (dollars in millions):
PPA of 2006 zone status or
plan funded status percentage for
plan years beginning July 1,
Contributions
Plan nameEmployer Identification Number202220212020Funding improvement planSurcharge imposed under PPA of 2006202220212020Year contributions to plan exceeded more than 5% of total contributions
Local 57 Trust Fund87-0640888
At least
80%
At least 80%At least 80%NoneNone$$$2022, 2021, 2020

PacifiCorp's minimum contributions to the Local 57 Trust Fund are based on the amount of wages paid to employees covered by the Local 57 Trust Fund collective bargaining agreements, subject to ERISA minimum funding requirements. The collective bargaining agreements governing the Local 57 Trust Fund that were due to expire in 2023 were extended to 2028 in December 2022.

Defined Contribution Plan

PacifiCorp's 401(k) Plan covers substantially all employees. PacifiCorp's matching contributions are based on each participant's level of contribution and, as of January 1, 2022, all participants receive contributions based on eligible pre-tax annual compensation. Contributions cannot exceed the maximum allowable for tax purposes. PacifiCorp's contributions to the 401(k) Plan were $44 million, $40 million and $41 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

(11)Asset Retirement Obligations

PacifiCorp estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.

PacifiCorp does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Cost of removal regulatory liabilities totaled $1,332 million and $1,187 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

228


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of PacifiCorp's ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$304 $270 
Change in estimated costs20 40 
Additions— 
Retirements(6)(15)
Accretion10 
Ending balance$331 $304 
Reflected as:
Other current liabilities$11 $
Other long-term liabilities320 299 
$331 $304 

Certain of PacifiCorp's decommissioning and reclamation obligations relate to jointly owned facilities and mine sites. PacifiCorp is committed to pay a proportionate share of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, PacifiCorp may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. PacifiCorp's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities.

(12)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

PacifiCorp is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. PacifiCorp is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk as it has an obligation to serve retail customer load in its service territories. PacifiCorp's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. PacifiCorp does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities.

PacifiCorp has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, PacifiCorp uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. PacifiCorp manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, PacifiCorp may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate PacifiCorp's exposure to interest rate risk. No interest rate derivatives were in place during the periods presented. PacifiCorp does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in PacifiCorp's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 13 for additional information on derivative contracts.

229


The following table, which reflects master netting arrangements and excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases or normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair value of PacifiCorp's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts to the amounts presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
OtherOtherOther
CurrentOtherCurrentLong-term
AssetsAssetsLiabilitiesLiabilitiesTotal
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
Commodity assets$279 $27 $$$318 
Commodity liabilities(22)(7)(14)(5)(48)
Total257 20 (5)(2)270 
Total derivatives257 20 (5)(2)270 
Cash collateral payable (2)
(73)(5)— — (78)
Total derivatives - net basis$184 $15 $(5)$(2)$192 
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
Commodity assets$81 $21 $$— $104 
Commodity liabilities(5)(1)(38)(7)(51)
Total76 20 (36)(7)53 
Total derivatives76 20 (36)(7)53 
Cash collateral receivable— — — 
Total derivatives - net basis$76 $20 $(31)$(7)$58 

(1)PacifiCorp's commodity derivatives are generally included in rates. As of December 31, 2022 a regulatory liability of $270 million was recorded related to the net derivative asset of $270 million. As of December 31, 2021 regulatory liability of $53 million was recorded related to the net derivative asset of $53 million.

(2)As December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp had an additional $12 million cash collateral payable that was not required to be netted against total derivatives.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of PacifiCorp's net regulatory (liabilities) assets and summarizes the pre-tax gains and losses on commodity derivative contracts recognized in net regulatory (liabilities) assets, as well as amounts reclassified to earnings for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$(53)$17 $62 
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory (liabilities) assets(513)(171)(11)
Net (losses) gains reclassified to operating revenue(13)(23)
Net gains (losses) reclassified to cost of fuel and energy309 124 (37)
Ending balance$(270)$(53)$17 

230


Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
Unit of
Measure20222021
Electricity purchases, netMegawatt hours
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms127 106 

Credit Risk

PacifiCorp is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent PacifiCorp's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, PacifiCorp analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, PacifiCorp enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, PacifiCorp exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in PacifiCorp's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

The aggregate fair value of PacifiCorp's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $48 million and $37 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, for which PacifiCorp had posted collateral of $— million and $5 million, respectively, in the form of cash deposits. If all credit-risk-related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, PacifiCorp would have been required to post $3 million and $23 million, respectively, of additional collateral. PacifiCorp's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation or other factors.

231


(13)Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of PacifiCorp's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. PacifiCorp has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Financial Statements using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that PacifiCorp has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect PacifiCorp's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. PacifiCorp develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

The following table presents PacifiCorp's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3
Other(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $318 $— $(119)$199 
Money market mutual funds649 — — — 649 
Investment funds23 — — — 23 
$672 $318 $— $(119)$871 
Liabilities - Commodity derivatives$— $(48)$— $41 $(7)
As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $104 $— $(8)$96 
Money market mutual funds181 — — — 181 
Investment funds27 — — — 27 
$208 $104 $— $(8)$304 
Liabilities - Commodity derivatives$— $(51)$— $13 $(38)

(1)Represents netting under master netting arrangements and a net cash collateral payable of $78 million and a net cash collateral receivable of $5 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As December 31, 2022, PacifiCorp had an additional $12 million cash collateral payable that was not required to be netted against total derivatives.

232


Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. A discounted cash flow valuation method was used to estimate fair value. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which PacifiCorp transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, PacifiCorp uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent PacifiCorp's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. PacifiCorp bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations, when available, or internally developed and commercial models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations are obtained from independent energy brokers, exchanges, direct communication with market participants and actual transactions executed by PacifiCorp. Market price quotations for certain major electricity and natural gas trading hubs are generally readily obtainable for the first three years; therefore, PacifiCorp's forward price curves for those locations and periods reflect observable market quotes. Market price quotations for other electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable for the first three years. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, as well as for those contracts that are not actively traded, PacifiCorp uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contracts is a function of underlying forward commodity prices, interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of contracts. Refer to Note 12 for further discussion regarding PacifiCorp's risk management and hedging activities.

PacifiCorp's investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are stated at fair value. When available, PacifiCorp uses a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market to record the fair value. In the absence of a quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security, the fair value is determined using pricing models or net asset values based on observable market inputs and quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristics.

PacifiCorp's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of PacifiCorp's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The carrying value of PacifiCorp's variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value because of the frequent repricing of these instruments at market rates. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of PacifiCorp's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$9,666 $9,045 $8,730 $10,374 

233


(14)Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments


PacifiCorp has the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Certain commitments are with related parties. Refer to Note 21 for transactions associated with these related party contracts. Minimum payments as of December 31, 20172022 are as follows (in millions):

202320242025202620272028 and ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Purchased electricity contracts -
commercially operable$547 $241 $199 $197 $197 $2,162 $3,543 
Purchased electricity contracts -
non-commercially operable— — 12 12 208 238 
Fuel contracts784 398 148 146 153 401 2,030 
Construction commitments535 210 14 — — 760 
Transmission108 100 74 65 55 418 820 
Easements21 20 20 21 21 720 823 
Maintenance, service and
other contracts101 54 55 53 53 197 513 
Total commitments$2,096 $1,023 $516 $495 $491 $4,106 $8,727 
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 and Thereafter Total
Contract type:             
Purchased electricity contracts -             
commercially operable$276
 $165
 $161
 $150
 $145
 $1,574
 $2,471
Purchased electricity contracts -             
non-commercially operable9
 18
 26
 26
 27
 451
 557
Fuel contracts695
 619
 591
 453
 337
 1,268
 3,963
Construction commitments85
 29
 3
 
 
 
 117
Transmission112
 96
 66
 49
 39
 428
 790
Operating leases and easements7
 7
 7
 7
 6
 97
 131
Maintenance, service and             
other contracts36
 34
 22
 25
 14
 80
 211
Total commitments$1,220
 $968
 $876
 $710
 $568
 $3,898
 $8,240

Purchased Electricity Contracts - Commercially Operable


As part of its energy resource portfolio, PacifiCorp acquires a portion of its electricity through long-term purchases and exchange agreements. PacifiCorp has several power purchase agreementsmany long-term PPAs primarily with solar-powered or wind-powered generating facilities that are not included in the table above as the payments are based on the amount of energy generated anddue to there arebeing no minimum payments. Includedpayments generally due to being dependent on wind and solar conditions. The PPAs generally range from 7 to 30 years in duration, with certain of the purchased electricityPPAs extending through 2054. Future payments associated with these PPAs are any power purchase agreements that meet the definitionexpected to be material. Certain of a lease. Rent expense relatedthese PPAs qualify as leases as described in Note 2. Refer to those power purchase agreements that meet the definition of aNote 5 for variable lease totaled $14 million for 2017 and 2016 and $13 million for 2015.costs associated with these lease commitments.


Included in the minimum fixed annual payments for purchased electricity above are commitments to purchase electricity from several hydroelectric systems under long-term arrangements with public utility districts. These purchases are made on a "cost-of-service" basis for a stated percentage of system output and for a like percentage of system operating expenses and debt service. These costs are included in energy costs on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. PacifiCorp is required to pay its portion of operating costs and its portion of the debt service, whether or not any electricity is produced. These arrangements accounted for less than 5% of PacifiCorp's 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 energy sources.


Purchased Electricity Contracts - Non-commerciallyNon-Commercially Operable


PacifiCorp has several contracts for purchases of electricity frommany long-term PPAs with facilities that have not yet achieved commercial operation. Tooperation, primarily related to wind-powered and solar-powered generated facilities and including with facilities that are not included in the table above due to there being no minimum payments generally due to being dependent on wind and solar conditions. The PPAs generally range from 7 to 30 years in duration with certain of the PPAs extending through 2054.

In September 2022, PacifiCorp entered into a purchased electricity contract for a 400 MW solar generating facility including a 200 MW battery storage unit. Minimum obligations associated with the battery storage unit are included in the table above. In January 2023, PacifiCorp entered into a PPA for a 525 MW solar generating facility with acorresponding agreement for a 150 MW battery storage unit for which the minimum obligations are being evaluated.

Future payments associated with these arrangements are expected to be material. However, to the extent any of these facilities do not achieve commercial operation,obligation, PacifiCorp has no obligation to the counterparty.counterparties.


234


Fuel Contracts


PacifiCorp has "take or pay" coal and natural gas contracts that require minimum payments.


Construction Commitments


PacifiCorp's construction commitments included in the table above relate to firm commitments and include costs associated with certain generating plant, transmission, and distribution projects.


Transmission


PacifiCorp has contracts for the right to transmit electricity over other entities' transmission lines to facilitate delivery to PacifiCorp's customers.



Operating Leases and Easements


PacifiCorp has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for certain operating facilities, office space, land and equipment that expire at various dates through the year ending December 31, 2096. These leases generally require PacifiCorp to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. PacifiCorp also has non-cancelable easements for land on which certain of its assets, primarily wind-powered generating facilities, are located. Rent expense totaled $15

Environmental Laws and Regulations

PacifiCorp is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal, wildfire prevention and mitigation and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. PacifiCorp believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Lower Klamath Hydroelectric Project

PacifiCorp is a party to the 2016 amended Klamath Hydroelectric Settlement Agreement ("KHSA"), which is intended to resolve disputes surrounding PacifiCorp's efforts to relicense the Klamath Hydroelectric Project. The KHSA establishes a process for PacifiCorp, the states of Oregon and California ("States") and other stakeholders to assess whether dam removal can occur consistent with the settlement's terms. For PacifiCorp, the key elements of the settlement include: (1) a contribution from PacifiCorp's Oregon and California customers capped at $200 million plus $250 million in California bond funds; (2) complete indemnification from harms associated with dam removal; (3) transfer of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") license to a third-party dam removal entity, the Klamath River Renewal Corporation ("KRRC"), who would conduct dam removal; and (4) ability for PacifiCorp to operate the facilities for the benefit of customers until dam removal commences.

In September 2016, the KRRC and PacifiCorp filed a joint application with the FERC to transfer the license for the four mainstem Klamath hydroelectric dams comprising the Lower Klamath Project (FERC Project No. 14803) from PacifiCorp to the KRRC. The FERC approved the partial transfer of the Klamath license in a July 2020 order, subject to the condition that PacifiCorp remains co-licensee. Under the amended KHSA, PacifiCorp did not agree to remain co-licensee during the surrender and removal process given concerns about liability protections for PacifiCorp and its customers. In November 2020, PacifiCorp entered a memorandum of agreement (the "MOA") with the KRRC, the Karuk Tribe, the Yurok Tribe and the States to continue implementation of the KHSA. The agreement required the States, PacifiCorp and KRRC to file a new license transfer application to remove PacifiCorp from the license for the Lower Klamath Project and add the States and KRRC as co-licensees for the purposes of surrender. In addition, the MOA provides for additional contingency funding of $45 million, equally split between PacifiCorp and the States, and for PacifiCorp and the States to equally share in any additional cost overruns in the unlikely event that dam removal costs exceed the $450 million in funding to ensure dam removal is complete. The MOA also requires PacifiCorp to cover the costs associated with certain pre-existing environmental conditions. In June 2021, the FERC approved the transfer of the Lower Klamath Project dams from PacifiCorp to the KRRC and the States as co-licensees. In July 2021, the Oregon, Wyoming, Idaho and California state public utility commissions conditionally approved the required property transfer applications. In August 2021, PacifiCorp notified the Public Service Commission of Utah of the property transfer, however no formal approval is required in Utah. In August 2022, the FERC staff issued a final environmental impact statement for the project, concluding that dam removal is the preferred action. In November 2022, the FERC issued a license surrender order for the project, which was accepted by the KRRC and the States in December 2022, along with the transfer of the Lower Klamath Project dams. Although PacifiCorp no longer owns the Lower Klamath Project, PacifiCorp will continue to operate the facilities under an operation and maintenance agreement with the KRRC until each facility is ready for removal. Removal of the Copco No. 2 facility is anticipated to begin in 2023, and removal of the remaining three dams (J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, and Iron Gate) is anticipated to begin in 2024.

235


Hydroelectric Commitments

Certain of PacifiCorp's hydroelectric licenses and settlement agreements contain requirements for PacifiCorp to make certain capital and operating expenditures related to its hydroelectric facilities, which are estimated to be approximately $282 million over the next 10 years.

Legal Matters

PacifiCorp is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. PacifiCorp does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. PacifiCorp is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties and other costs in substantial amounts and are described below.

Wildfires Overview

A provision for a loss contingency is recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. PacifiCorp evaluates the related range of reasonably estimated losses and records a loss based on its best estimate within that range or the lower end of the range if there is no better estimate.

In California, under inverse condemnation, courts have held that investor-owned utilities can be liable for real and personal property damages from wildfires without the utility being found negligent and regardless of fault. California law also permits inverse condemnation plaintiffs to recover reasonable attorney fees and costs. In both Oregon and California, PacifiCorp has equipment in areas accessed through special use permits, easements or similar agreements that may contain provisions requiring it to pay for damages caused by its equipment regardless of fault. Even if inverse condemnation or other provisions do not apply, PacifiCorp could be found liable for all damages proximately caused by negligence, including real and personal property and natural resource damages; fire suppression costs; personal injury and loss of life damages; and interest.

2020 Wildfires

In September 2020, a severe weather event resulting in high winds, low humidity and warm temperatures contributed to several major wildfires, which resulted in real and personal property and natural resource damage, personal injuries and loss of life and widespread power outages in Oregon and Northern California. The wildfires spread across certain parts of PacifiCorp's service territory and surrounding areas across multiple counties in Oregon and California, including Siskiyou County, California; Jackson County, Oregon; Douglas County, Oregon; Marion County, Oregon; Lincoln County, Oregon; and Klamath County, Oregon burning over 500,000 acres in aggregate. Third party reports for these wildfires indicate over 2,000 structures destroyed, including residences; several structures damaged; multiple individuals injured; and several fatalities. Fire suppression costs estimated by various agencies total approximately $150 million.

Investigations into the cause and origin of each wildfire are complex and ongoing and being conducted by various entities, including the U.S. Forest Service, the California Public Utilities Commission, the Oregon Department of Forestry, the Oregon Department of Justice, PacifiCorp and various experts engaged by PacifiCorp.

As of the date of this filing, numerous lawsuits have been filed in Oregon and California, including a class action complaint in Oregon, on behalf of plaintiffs related to the 2020 Wildfires. The plaintiffs seek damages that include property damages, economic losses, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and other damages. Additionally, several insurance carriers have filed subrogation complaints in Oregon and California with allegations similar to those made in the aforementioned lawsuits. The final determinations of liability, however, will only be made following the completion of comprehensive investigations and litigation processes.

PacifiCorp has accrued cumulative estimated probable losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $477 million, through December 31, 2022. The accrual includes PacifiCorp's estimate of losses for fire suppression costs, real and personal property damages, natural resource damages for certain areas and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages that are considered probable of being incurred and that it is reasonably able to estimate at this time. For certain aspects of the 2020 Wildfires for which loss is considered probable, information necessary to reasonably estimate the potential losses, such as those related to certain areas of natural resource damages, is not currently available.

236


It is reasonably possible PacifiCorp will incur additional losses beyond the amounts accrued; however, PacifiCorp is currently unable to estimate the range of possible additional losses that could be incurred due to the number of properties and parties involved and the variation in those types of properties and lack of available details. To the extent losses beyond the amounts accrued are incurred, additional insurance coverage is expected to be available to cover a portion of the losses.

The following table presents changes in PacifiCorp's liability for estimated losses associated with the 2020 Wildfires for the years ended December 31 2017, 2016(in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$252 $252 $— 
Accrued losses225 — 252 
Payments(53)— — 
Ending balance$424 $252 $252 

PacifiCorp's receivable for expected insurance recoveries associated with the probable losses was $246 million and 2015.$116 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, PacifiCorp recognized probable losses net of expected insurance recoveries associated with the 2020 Wildfires of $64 million, $— million and $136 million, respectively.


2022 McKinney Fire

According to California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, on July 29, 2022, at approximately 2:16 p.m. Pacific Time, a wildfire began in the Oak Knoll Ranger District of the Klamath National Forest in Siskiyou County, California (the "2022 McKinney Fire") located in PacifiCorp's service territory. Third party reports indicate that the 2022 McKinney Fire resulted in 11 structures damaged, 185 structures destroyed, 12 injuries and four fatalities and consumed 60,000 acres. The cause of the 2022 McKinney Fire is undetermined and remains under investigation by the U.S. Forest Service.

Due to the preliminary nature of the investigation PacifiCorp does not believe a loss is probable and therefore has not accrued any loss as of the date of this filing. While the loss is not probable, PacifiCorp estimates the potential loss, excluding losses for natural resource damages, to be $31 million, net of expected insurance recoveries. The loss estimate includes PacifiCorp's estimate of losses for fire suppression costs; real and personal property damages; and noneconomic damages such as personal injury damages and loss of life damages. PacifiCorp is unable to estimate the total potential loss, including losses for natural resource damages, because there are a number of unknown facts and legal considerations that may impact the amount of any potential liability, including the total scope and nature of claims that may be asserted against PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp has insurance available and estimates the potential insurance recoveries to be $103 million, to cover potential losses.

As of the date of this filing, multiple lawsuits have been filed in California on behalf of plaintiffs related to the 2022 McKinney Fire. The plaintiffs seek damages that include property damages, economic losses, punitive damages, exemplary damages, attorneys' fees and other damages but the amount of damages sought are not specified. The final determinations of liability, however, will only be made following the completion of comprehensive investigations and litigation processes.

Guarantees


PacifiCorp has entered into guarantees as part of the normal course of business and the sale or transfer of certain assets. These guarantees are not expected to have a material impact on PacifiCorp's consolidated financial results.


237
(14)


(15)Revenue from Contracts with Customers

The following table summarizes PacifiCorp's Customer Revenue by line of business, with further disaggregation of retail by customer class, for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Retail:
Residential$2,013 $1,914 $1,910 
Commercial1,645 1,559 1,578 
Industrial1,163 1,125 1,185 
Other retail278 249 259 
Total retail5,099 4,847 4,932 
Wholesale260 157 107 
Transmission166 143 96 
Other Customer Revenue102 108 108 
Total Customer Revenue5,627 5,255 5,243 
Other revenue52 41 98 
Total operating revenue$5,679 $5,296 $5,341 

(16)Preferred Stock


PacifiCorp has 3,500 thousand shares of Serial Preferred Stock authorized at the stated value of $100 per share. PacifiCorp had 24 thousand shares of Serial Preferred Stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021. The outstanding preferred stock series are non-redeemable and have annual dividend rates of 6.00% and 7.00%.


In the event of voluntary liquidation, all preferred stock is entitled to stated value or a specified preference amount per share plus accrued dividends. Upon involuntary liquidation, all preferred stock is entitled to stated value plus accrued dividends. Dividends on all preferred stock are cumulative. Holders also have the right to elect members to the PacifiCorp Board of Directors in the event dividends payable are in default in an amount equal to four full quarterly payments.


PacifiCorp also has 16 million shares of No Par Serial Preferred Stock and 127 thousand shares of 5% Preferred Stock authorized, but no shares were issued or outstanding as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


(15)(17)Common Shareholder's Equity

In February 2018, PacifiCorp declared a dividend of $250 million payable to PPW Holdings LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE and PacifiCorp's direct parent company ("PPW Holdings") in March 2018.


Through PPW Holdings, BHE is the sole shareholder of PacifiCorp's common stock. The state regulatory orders that authorized BHE's acquisition of PacifiCorp contain restrictions on PacifiCorp's ability to pay dividends to the extent that they would reduce PacifiCorp's common equity below specified percentages of defined capitalization. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the most restrictive of these commitments prohibits PacifiCorp from making any distribution to PPW Holdings or BHE without prior state regulatory approval to the extent that it would reduce PacifiCorp's common equity below 44% of its total capitalization, excluding short-term debt and current maturities of long-term debt. The terms of this commitment treat 50% of PacifiCorp's remaining balance of preferred stock in existence prior to the acquisition of PacifiCorp by BHE as common equity. As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp's actual common equity percentage, as calculated under this measure, was 54%, and PacifiCorp would have been permitted to dividend $2.5$3.5 billion under this commitment.


These commitments also restrict PacifiCorp from making any distributions to either PPW Holdings or BHE if PacifiCorp's senior unsecured debt rating is BBB- or lower by Standard & Poor's Rating Services or Fitch Ratings, or Baa3 or lower by Moody's Investor Service, as indicated by two of the three rating services. As of December 31, 2017,2022, PacifiCorp met the minimum required senior unsecured debt ratings for making distributions.


PacifiCorp is also subject to a maximum debt-to-total capitalization percentage under various financing agreements as further discussed in Note 6.7.


In January 2023, PacifiCorp declared dividends of $300 million payable to PPW Holdings LLC in February 2023.
(16)
238


(18)    Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net


Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net consists of unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax, of $15$9 million and $12$17 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.



(17)Variable-Interest
(19)Variable Interest Entities


PacifiCorp holds a two-thirds66.67% interest in Bridger Coal Company ("Bridger Coal"), which supplies coal to the Jim Bridger generating facility that is owned two-thirds66.67% by PacifiCorp and one-third33.33% by PacifiCorp's joint venture partner in Bridger Coal. PacifiCorp purchases two-thirds66.67% of the coal produced by Bridger Coal, while the remaining coal is purchased by the joint venture partner.partner purchases the remaining 33.33% of the coal produced. The power to direct the activities that most significantly impact Bridger Coal's economic performance are shared with the joint venture partner. Each joint venture partner is jointly and severally liable for the obligations of Bridger Coal. Bridger Coal's necessary working capital to carry out its mining operations is financed by contributions from PacifiCorp and its joint venture partner. PacifiCorp's equity investment in Bridger Coal was $137$28 million and $165$45 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. Refer to Note 1821 for information regarding related-partyrelated party transactions with Bridger Coal.


(18)Related-Party(20)Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$380 $395 $348 
Income taxes (received) paid, net$(185)$(120)$107 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$558 $254 $344 

(21)Related Party Transactions


PacifiCorp has an intercompany administrative services agreement and a mutual assistance agreement with BHE and its subsidiaries. Amounts charged to PacifiCorp by BHE and its subsidiaries under this agreementthese agreements totaled $11$123 million, $70 million and $14 million during the yearyears ended December 31, 2017,2022, 2021 and $10 million during each2020, respectively. Amounts charged to PacifiCorp in 2022 and 2021 were primarily reflected in construction work in progress on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of the years ended 2016December 31, 2022 and 2015.2021. Payables associated with these administrative servicesthe charges were $2$16 million and $9 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. Amounts charged by PacifiCorp to BHE and its subsidiaries under this agreementthese agreements totaled $3$23 million, $4$8 million and $7$5 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Receivables associated with these administrative services were $1 million as of December 31, 2017Such amounts primarily relate to information technology projects and 2016, respectively.other costs managed at a consolidated level and allocated or passed through to affiliates.


PacifiCorp also engages in various transactions with several subsidiaries of BHE in the ordinary course of business. Services provided by these subsidiaries in the ordinary course of business and charged to PacifiCorp primarily relate to wholesale electricity purchases and transmission of electricity, transportation of natural gas and employee relocation services. These expenses totaled $8 million, $6 million $7 million and $8$6 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015, respectively. Payables associated with these services were $1 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amounts charged by PacifiCorp to subsidiaries of BHE for wholesale electricity sales in the ordinary course of business totaled $1 million, $1 million and $2 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,2020, respectively.


PacifiCorp has long-term transportation contracts with BNSF Railway Company, ("BNSF"), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, PacifiCorp's ultimate parent company. Transportation costs under these contracts were $35$21 million, $37$19 million and $39$29 million during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. As

PacifiCorp has a long-term master materials supply contract with Marmon Utility, LLC, an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of a holding company in which Berkshire Hathaway holds a majority interest. Materials and supplies purchased under this contract were $8 million, $2 million and $3 million during the years ended December 31, 20172022, 2021 and 2016, PacifiCorp had $3 million and $1 million, respectively, of accounts payable to BNSF outstanding under these contracts, including indirect payables related to a jointly owned facility.2020, respectively.


239


PacifiCorp is party to a tax-sharing agreement and is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated United StatesU.S. federal income tax return. Federal and state income taxes receivable from BHE were $59$84 million and $17$48 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022 and 2015,2021, cash paidrefunded from BHE for federal and state income taxes totaled $185 million and $120 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2020, cash paid to BHE for federal and state income taxes totaled $340 million, $201 million and $40 million, respectively.$107 million.


PacifiCorp transacts with its equity investees, Bridger Coal and Trapper Mining Inc. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, PacifiCorp charged Bridger Coal $2 million, $2 million and $19 million, respectively, primarily for the sale of mining equipment in 2015, administrative support and management services, as well as materials, provided by PacifiCorp to Bridger Coal. Receivables for these services, as well as for certain expenses paid by PacifiCorp and reimbursed by Bridger Coal, were $5 million and $5 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Services provided by equity investees to PacifiCorp primarily relate to coal purchases. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, coal purchases from PacifiCorp's equity investees totaled $170$119 million, $174$148 million and $181$145 million, respectively. Payables to PacifiCorp's equity investees were $18$10 million and $17$7 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.


(19)Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
240
  2017 2016 2015
       
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized $350
 $350
 $342
Income taxes paid, net $340
 $201
 $40


Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Accounts payable related to property, plant and equipment additions $147
 $101
 $147
Accounts receivable related to property, plant and equipment sales $
 $
 $40

MidAmerican Funding, LLC and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy Company
Consolidated Financial Section

241
Item 6.Selected Financial Data

Information required by


Item 6 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(a) to Form 10-K.7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations


Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

MidAmerican Funding is an Iowa limited liability company whose sole member is BHE. MidAmerican Funding owns all of the outstanding common stock of MHC, which owns all of the common stock of MidAmerican Energy, Midwest Capital and MEC Construction. MHC, MidAmerican Funding and BHE are headquartered in Des Moines, Iowa.

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of MidAmerican Funding and its subsidiaries and MidAmerican Energy as presented in this joint filing.during the periods included herein. Information in Management's Discussion and Analysis related to MidAmerican Energy, whether or not segregated, also relates to MidAmerican Funding. Information related to other subsidiaries of MidAmerican Funding pertains only to the discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of MidAmerican Funding. Where necessary, discussions have been segregated under the heading "MidAmerican Funding" to allow the reader to identify information applicable only to MidAmerican Funding. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with theMidAmerican Funding's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and MidAmerican Energy's historical Financial Statements and Notes to Financial Statements each in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. MidAmerican Energy'sFunding's and MidAmerican Funding'sEnergy's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.



Results of Operations


Overview


MidAmerican Energy -


MidAmerican Energy's net income for 20172022 was $605$961 million, an increase of $63$67 million, or 12%7%, compared to 2016, including $7 million of net expense as2021 primarily due to higher electric utility margin, a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (the "2017 Tax Reform"). Excluding the net effect of the 2017 Tax Reform, adjusted net income for 2017 was $612 million, an increase of $70 million, or 13%, compared to 2016. The increase was due to a higherfavorable income tax benefit, from additional production tax credits of $38 million, the effects of ratemaking and lower pre-tax income,higher natural gas utility margin and higher electric gross margins of $76 million, excluding the impact of an increase in electric DSM program revenue (offset in operating expense) of $22 million, partially offset by higher maintenance expense of $52 million due to additional wind-powered generating facilities and the timing of fossil-fueled generation maintenance, higher depreciation and amortization of $21 million due to wind-powered generation and other plant placed in-service and accruals for Iowa regulatory arrangements, partially offset by a December 2016 reduction in depreciation rates, and higher property and other taxes of $7 million. Electric gross margins increased due to higher recoveries through bill riders, higher retail customer volumes, higher wholesale revenue and higher transmission revenue, partially offset by higher coal and purchased power costs. Retail customer volumes increased 2.4% due to industrial growth net of lower residential and commercial volumes from milder temperatures.

MidAmerican Energy's income from continuing operations of $542 million for 2016 increased $96 million, or 22%, compared to 2015 due to higher electric margins of $172 million, higher production tax credits of $39 million and lower fossil-fueled generation operations and maintenance of $35 million,AFUDC, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense, higher operations and maintenance expense, unfavorable changes in the cash surrender value of $72corporate-owned life insurance policies, higher non-service benefit plan costs, higher interest expense and lower nonregulated utility margin. Electric utility margin increased due to higher wholesale utility margin from higher margins per unit and higher wholesale customer volumes of 12.2% and higher retail utility margin, largely from higher retail customer volumes. Retail customer volumes increased 4.3% due to higher customer usage, reflecting the favorable impact of weather and an increase in certain industrial customer usage. Energy generated increased 6% primarily due to higher wind-powered generation, partially offset by lower coal-fueled generation, and energy purchased increased 19%. The favorable income tax benefit was mainly due to higher PTCs recognized from higher wind- and solar-powered generation, partially offset by the timing of state income tax benefits. Depreciation and amortization expense increased primarily from the impacts of certain regulatory mechanisms and additional assets placed in-service.

MidAmerican Energy's net income for 2021 was $894 million, an increase of $68 million, or 8%, compared to 2020 primarily due to higher electric utility margin and a favorable income tax benefit, partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expense, higher operations and maintenance expense and lower allowances for equity and borrowed funds. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to a higher retail utility margin, largely from higher customer volumes and price impacts from changes in sales mix, and higher wholesale utility margin from higher margins per unit and higher wholesale customer volumes of 42.7%. Electric retail customer volumes increased 5.8% primarily due to higher customer usage for certain industrial customers. Energy generated increased 26% primarily due to higher coal-fueled generation and higher wind-powered generation, and other plant placed in serviceenergy purchased decreased 35%. Operations and an accrual related to an Iowa revenue sharing arrangement, higher operations costs recovered through bill riders of $20 million, higher interestmaintenance expense of $13 millionincreased primarily due to the issuance of first mortgage bondshigher costs associated with additional wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service as well as higher natural gas distribution costs, partially offset by 2020 costs associated with storm restoration activities. The increase in October 2015depreciation and a loweramortization expense was primarily due to higher regulatory mechanisms and additional assets placed in-service. The favorable income tax benefit was from higher PTCs recognized due to higher pre-taxnew wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in late 2020 and 2021, state income tax impacts and the effects of ratemaking. Electric margins reflect higher retail rates in Iowa, higher retail sales volumes, lower energy costs, higher wholesale revenue and higher transmission revenue.pretax income.


MidAmerican Funding -


MidAmerican Funding's net income for 20172022 was $574$947 million, an increase of $42$64 million, or 7%, compared to 2021. MidAmerican Funding's net income for 2021 was $883 million, an increase of $65 million, or 8%, compared to 2016, including after-tax charges of $17 million related to the tender offer of a portion of its 6.927% Senior Bonds2020. The increases were primarily due 2029 and $10 million of net expense as a result of the 2017 Tax Reform. Excluding the net effect of the 2017 Tax Reform and the tender offer, MidAmerican Funding's adjusted net income for 2017 was $601 million, an increase of $69 million, or 13%, compared to 2016. MidAmerican Funding's income from continuing operations for 2016 was $532 million, an increase of $90 million, or 20%, compared to 2015. In addition to the changes in MidAmerican Energy's earnings discussed above, MidAmerican Funding,above.


242


Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Management utilizes various key financial measures that are prepared in 2015, recognized an $8 million after-tax gain on the sale of an investment in a generating facility lease.


Regulated Electric Gross Margin

Operating revenueaccordance with GAAP, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as, electric utility margin and cost of fuel, energy and capacity are the key drivers of MidAmerican Energy's regulated electricnatural gas utility margin, to help evaluate results of operationsoperations. Electric utility margin is calculated as they encompass retail and wholesale electricity revenue and the direct costs associated with providing electricity to customers. MidAmerican Energy believes that a discussion of gross margin, representingregulated electric operating revenue less cost of fuel and energy, which are captions presented on the Statements of Operations. Natural gas utility margin is calculated as regulated natural gas operating revenue less cost of natural gas purchased for resale, which are included in regulated natural gas and other and cost of natural gas purchased for resale and other, respectively, on the Statements of Operations.

MidAmerican Energy's cost of fuel and energy and capacity,cost of natural gas purchased for resale are generally recovered from its retail customers through regulatory recovery mechanisms and, as a result, changes in MidAmerican Energy's expenses included in regulatory recovery mechanisms result in comparable changes to revenue. As such, management believes electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin more appropriately and concisely explain profitability rather than a discussion of revenue and cost of sales separately. Management believes the presentation of electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin provides meaningful and valuable insight into the information management considers important to managing the business and a measure of comparability to others in the industry.

Electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating income, which is thereforethe most directly comparable financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table provides a reconciliation of utility margin to operating income for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021Change20212020Change
Electric utility margin:
Operating revenue$2,988 $2,529 $459 18 %$2,529 $2,139 $390 18 %
Cost of fuel and energy679 539 140 26 539 339 200 59 
Electric utility margin2,309 1,990 319 16 %1,990 1,800 190 11 %
Natural gas utility margin:
Operating revenue1,030 1,003 27 %1,003 573 430 75 %
Natural gas purchased for resale762 760 — 760 327 433 *
Natural gas utility margin268 243 25 10 %243 246 (3)(1)%
Utility margin$2,577 $2,233 $344 15 %$2,233 $2,046 $187 %
Other operating revenue15 (8)(53)%15 88 %
Other cost of sales— — — — 
Operations and maintenance828 775 53 775 754 21 
Depreciation and amortization1,168 914 254 28 914 716 198 28 
Property and other taxes149 142 142 135 
Operating income$438 $416 $22 %$416 $448 $(32)(7)%
*    Not meaningful.


243


Electric Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to regulated electric grossutility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$2,988 $2,529 $459 18 %$2,529 $2,139 $390 18 %
Cost of fuel and energy679 539 140 26 539 339 200 59 
Utility margin$2,309 $1,990 $319 16 %$1,990 $1,800 $190 11 %
Sales (GWhs):
Residential7,006 6,718 288 %6,718 6,687 31 — %
Commercial4,017 3,841 176 3,841 3,707 134 
Industrial16,646 15,944 702 15,944 14,645 1,299 
Other1,621 1,571 50 1,571 1,484 87 
Total retail29,290 28,074 1,216 28,074 26,523 1,551 
Wholesale17,964 16,011 1,953 12 16,011 11,219 4,792 43 
Total sales47,254 44,085 3,169 %44,085 37,742 6,343 17 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)8138049%8047959%
Average revenue per MWh:
Retail$79.23 $75.84 $3.39 %$75.84 $72.57 $3.27 %
Wholesale$31.07 $18.92 $12.15 64 %$18.92 $11.08 $7.84 71 %
Heating degree days6,449 5,704 745 13 %5,704 5,932 (228)(4)%
Cooling degree days1,274 1,331 (57)(4)%1,331 1,172 159 14 %
Sources of energy (GWhs)(1):
Wind and other(2)
28,129 23,374 4,755 20 %23,374 20,668 2,706 13 %
Coal10,078 12,313 (2,235)(18)12,313 7,217 5,096 71 
Nuclear3,782 3,934 (152)(4)3,934 3,927 — 
Natural gas1,504 1,398 106 1,398 675 723 *
Total energy generated43,493 41,019 2,474 41,019 32,487 8,532 26 
Energy purchased4,594 3,865 729 19 3,865 5,979 (2,114)(35)
Total48,087 44,884 3,203 %44,884 38,466 6,418 17 %
Average cost of energy per MWh:
Energy generated(3)
$7.42 $7.12 $0.30 %$7.12 $4.74 $2.38 50 %
Energy purchased$77.59 $64.04 $13.55 21 %$64.04 $30.94 $33.10 *
 2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
Gross margin (in millions):               
Operating revenue$2,108
 $1,985
 $123
 6 % $1,985
 $1,837
 $148
 8 %
Cost of fuel, energy and capacity(1)
434
 409
 25
 6
 409
 433
 (24) (6)
Gross margin$1,674
 $1,576
 $98
 6
 $1,576
 $1,404
 $172
 12
                
Sales (GWh):               
Residential6,207
 6,408
 (201) (3)% 6,408
 6,166
 242
 4 %
Commercial3,761
 3,812
 (51) (1) 3,812
 3,806
 6
 
Industrial12,957
 12,115
 842
 7
 12,115
 11,487
 628
 5
Other1,567
 1,589
 (22) (1) 1,589
 1,583
 6
 
Total retail24,492
 23,924
 568
 2
 23,924
 23,042
 882
 4
Wholesale9,165
 8,489
 676
 8
 8,489
 8,741
 (252) (3)
Total sales33,657
 32,413
 1,244
 4
 32,413
 31,783
 630
 2
                
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)770
 760
 10
 1 % 760
 752
 8
 1 %
                
Average revenue per MWh:               
Retail$73.88
 $71.86
 $2.02
 3 % $71.86
 $69.68
 $2.18
 3 %
Wholesale$23.42
 $22.95
 $0.47
 2 % $22.95
 $20.09
 $2.86
 14 %
                
Heating degree days5,492
 5,321
 171
 3 % 5,321
 5,654
 (333) (6)%
Cooling degree days1,117
 1,314
 (197) (15)% 1,314
 1,067
 247
 23 %
                
Sources of energy (GWh)(1):
               
Coal13,598
 13,179
 419
 3 % 13,179
 15,525
 (2,346) (15)%
Wind and other(2)
12,932
 11,684
 1,248
 11
 11,684
 9,606
 2,078
 22
Nuclear3,850
 3,912
 (62) (2) 3,912
 3,885
 27
 1
Natural gas360
 556
 (196) (35) 556
 199
 357
 179
Total energy generated30,740
 29,331
 1,409
 5
 29,331
 29,215
 116
 
Energy purchased3,603
 3,882
 (279) (7) 3,882
 3,194
 688
 22
Total34,343
 33,213
 1,130
 3
 33,213
 32,409
 804
 2
*    Not meaningful.

(1)    GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.

(1)GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.

(2)All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these generating facilities may be: (a) used in future years to comply with renewable portfolio standards or other regulatory requirements or (b) sold to third parties in the form of renewable energy credits(2)    All or some of the renewable energy attributes associated with generation from these sources may be: (a) used in future years to comply with RPS or other regulatory requirements or (b) sold to third parties in the form of RECs or other environmental commodities.


For 2017 compared to 2016, regulated electric gross margin increased $98 million primarily due to:
(1)Higher retail gross margin of $51 million due to -
an increase(3)    The average cost per MWh of $73 million from higher recoveries through bill riders, including $22 million of electric DSM program revenue (offset in operating expense);
an increase of $32 million from non-weather-related usage factors, including higher industrial sales volumes; partially offset by
a decrease of $33 million from higher retail energy costs primarily due to higher coal-fueled generation and higher purchased power costs; and
a decrease of $21 million fromgenerated includes only the impact of milder temperatures;
(2)Higher wholesale gross margin of $32 million due to higher margins per unit from higher market prices, greater availability of lower cost generation for wholesale purposes and higher sales volumes; and
(3)Higher Multi-Value Projects ("MVP") transmission revenue of $13 million due to continued capital additions.

For 2016 compared to 2015, regulated electric gross margin increased $172 million primarily due to:
(1)Higher retail gross margin of $118 million due to -
an increase of $47 million from higher electric rates in Iowa effective January 1, 2016, for the third step of a 2014 Iowa rate increase;
an increase of $33 million primarily from non-weather-related usage factors, including higher industrial sales volumes;
an increase of $27 million from the impact of temperatures;
an increase of $13 million from lower retail energy costs due to a lower average cost of fuel for generation and lower coal-fueled generation; partially offset byassociated with the generating facilities.
a decrease of $2 million from lower recoveries through bill riders;
(2)Higher wholesale gross margin of $37 million due to higher margins per unit from greater availability of lower cost generation for wholesale purposes, partially offset by lower sales volumes attributable to lower coal-fueled generation; and
(3)Higher MVP transmission revenue of $17 million, which is expected to increase as projects are constructed.



244


RegulatedNatural Gas GrossUtility Margin

Operating revenue and cost of gas sold are the key drivers of MidAmerican Energy's regulated gas results of operations as they encompass retail and wholesale natural gas revenue and the direct costs associated with providing natural gas to customers. MidAmerican Energy believes that a discussion of gross margin, representing operating revenue less cost of gas sold, is therefore meaningful.


A comparison of key operating results related to regulatednatural gas grossutility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$1,030 $1,003 $27 %$1,003 $573 $430 75 %
Natural gas purchased for resale762 760 — 760 327 433 *
Utility margin$268 $243 $25 10 %$243 $246 $(3)(1)%
Throughput (000's Dths):
Residential56,100 48,984 7,116 15 %48,984 51,023 (2,039)(4)%
Commercial26,298 23,240 3,058 13 23,240 23,336 (96)— 
Industrial6,039 5,287 752 14 5,287 5,275 12 — 
Other75 68 10 68 74 (6)(8)
Total retail sales88,512 77,579 10,933 14 77,579 79,708 (2,129)(3)
Wholesale sales30,996 34,337 (3,341)(10)34,337 34,691 (354)(1)
Total sales119,508 111,916 7,592 111,916 114,399 (2,483)(2)
Natural gas transportation service102,827 112,631 (9,804)(9)112,631 110,263 2,368 
Total throughput222,335 224,547 (2,212)(1)%224,547 224,662 (115)— %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)789 781 %781 774 %
Average revenue per retail Dth sold$9.19 $10.59 $(1.40)(13)%$10.59 $5.91 $4.68 79 %
Heating degree days6,810 6,000 810 14 %6,000 6,253 (253)(4)%
Average cost of natural gas per retail Dth sold$6.66 $7.95 $(1.29)(16)%$7.95 $3.29 $4.66 *
Combined retail and wholesale average cost of natural gas per Dth sold$6.38 $6.79 $(0.41)(6)%$6.79 $2.86 $3.93 *
 2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
Gross margin (in millions):               
Operating revenue$719
 $637
 $82
 13 % $637
 $661
 $(24) (4)%
Cost of gas sold441
 367
 74
 20
 367
 397
 (30) (8)
Gross margin$278
 $270
 $8
 3
 $270
 $264
 $6
 2
                
Natural gas throughput (000's Dths):               
Residential46,366
 46,020
 346
 1 % 46,020
 46,519
 (499) (1)%
Commercial23,434
 23,345
 89
 
 23,345
 23,466
 (121) (1)
Industrial4,725
 5,079
 (354) (7) 5,079
 4,833
 246
 5
Other38
 37
 1
 3
 37
 37
 
 
Total retail sales74,563
 74,481
 82
 
 74,481
 74,855
 (374) 
Wholesale sales39,735
 38,813
 922
 2
 38,813
 35,250
 3,563
 10
Total sales114,298
 113,294
 1,004
 1
 113,294
 110,105
 3,189
 3
Gas transportation service92,136
 83,610
 8,526
 10
 83,610
 80,001
 3,609
 5
Total natural gas throughput206,434
 196,904
 9,530
 5
 196,904
 190,106
 6,798
 4
                
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)751
 742
 9
 1 % 742
 733
 9
 1 %
Average revenue per retail Dth sold$7.64
 $6.85
 $0.79
 12 % $6.85
 $7.12
 $(0.27) (4)%
Average cost of natural gas per retail Dth sold$4.41
 $3.70
 $0.71
 19 % $3.70
 $4.03
 $(0.33) (8)%
                
Combined retail and wholesale average cost of natural gas per Dth sold$3.86
 $3.24
 $0.62
 19 % $3.24
 $3.61
 $(0.37) (10)%
                
Heating degree days5,788
 5,616
 172
 3 % 5,616
 5,913
 (297) (5)%
*    Not meaningful.


Regulated gas revenue includes purchased gas adjustments clauses ("PGAs") through which Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021

MidAmerican Energy is allowed to recover the cost of gas sold from its retail gas-

Electric utility customers. Consequently, fluctuations in the cost of gas sold do not directly affect gross margin increased $319 million, or net income because regulated gas revenue reflects comparable fluctuations through the PGAs. For 2017, MidAmerican Energy's combined retail and wholesale average per-unit cost of gas sold increased 19%16%, resulting in an increase of $67 million in gas revenue and cost of gas soldfor 2022 compared to 2016. For 2016, MidAmerican Energy's combined retail and2021 primarily due to:
a $250 million increase in wholesale average per-unit cost of gas sold decreased 10%, resulting in a decrease of $42 million in gas revenue and cost of gas sold compared to 2015. Additionally, fluctuations in gas wholesale sales impact gas revenue and cost of gas sold but do not affect regulated gas gross margin.

For 2017 compared to 2016, regulated gas grossutility margin increased $8 million due to:
(1)higher DSM program revenue (offset in operations and maintenance expense) of $3 million;
(2)higher retail sales volumes of $2 million from colder winter temperatures;
(3)higher gas transportation throughput of $2 million and
(4)higher average per-unit margin of $2 million.

For 2016 compared to 2015, regulated gas gross margin increased $6 million due to:
(1)higher DSM program revenue (offset in operations and maintenance expense) of $6 million;
(2)higher gas transportation throughput of $2 million;
(3)higher average per-unit margin of $1 million, partially offset by
(4)lower retail sales volumes of $3 million from warmer winter temperatures.

Regulated Operating Costs and Expenses

Operations and maintenance increased $88 million for 2017 compared to 2016 due to higher DSM programmargins per unit of $237 million, reflecting higher market prices and lower energy costs, and higher volumes of 12.2%;
a $66 million increase in retail utility margin primarily due to $62 million from higher customer usage, including $7 million from the favorable impact of weather; and $9 million, net of energy costs, from higher recoveries through bill riders (offset in operations and maintenance expense and income tax benefit); partially offset by $6 million in 2021 from liquidated damages related to a wind-powered generation project. Retail customer volumes increased 4.3%; and
a $3 million increase in Multi-Value Projects ("MVP") transmission revenue.
Natural gas utility margin increased $25 million, or 10%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to:
an $18 million increase in customer usage, including $9 million from the favorable impact of $25weather;
a $5 million increase from higher refunds related to amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes arising from in 2017 Tax Reform (offset in income tax benefit); and
a $3 million increase in natural gas transportation margin, reflecting higher prices.
245


Operations and maintenance increased $53 million, or 7%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher other power generation costs of $21 million from additional wind turbines and easements, higher electric distribution costs of $17 million reflecting greater tree-trimming efforts, higher steam generation costs of $13 million and higher transmission operations costs from MISO of $6 million, both of which are recoverable in bill riders andpartially offset in operating revenue, higher coal-fueled and nuclear generation maintenance of $22 million substantially due to the timing of coal-fueled generation outages, higher wind-powered generation maintenance of $18 million from additional wind turbines and higher electric distribution and transmission maintenance of $12 million due to tree trimming costs.

Operations and maintenance decreased $12 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due toby lower fossil-fueled generation maintenance of $24 million from the timing of planned outages, lower generation operations of $7 million, lower health care, information technology and other administrative costs of $7 million and lower electric and gas distribution costs of $6 million.

Depreciation and amortization increased $254 million, partially offset by higher DSM program costs of $11 million and higher transmission operations costs from MISO of $9 million, both of which are recoverable in bill riders and matched by increases in revenue, and higher wind-powered generation maintenance of $13 millionor 28%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to the addition of wind turbines.

Depreciation$181 million from higher Iowa revenue sharing accruals, $40 million related to new and amortization increased $21 million for 2017 compared to 2016 due to utility plant additions, includingrepowered wind-powered generating facilities and other plant placed in-service in the second half of 2016, accruals for Iowa regulatory arrangements of $15 million, partially offset byand $31 million from lower depreciation rates implemented in December 2016.a regulatory mechanism that provides customers the retail energy benefits of certain wind-powered generation projects.


Depreciation and amortization increased $72 million for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to additional wind-powered generating facilities placed in-service in the second half of 2015 and the fourth quarter of 2016 and $34 million for accruals for regulatory arrangements in Iowa that reduce electric utility net plant.

Property and other taxes increased $7 million, or 5%, for 20172022 compared to 20162021 primarily due to higher Iowa replacement taxes from higher sales volumes and higher wind turbine property taxes.


Other Income and (Expense)

MidAmerican Energy -

Interest expense increased $18$11 million, or 4%, for 20172022 compared to 2016 due to higher interest expense from the issuance of $850 million of first mortgage bonds in February 2017 and $30 million of variable rate tax-exempt bonds in December 2016, partially offset by the redemption of $250 million of 5.95% Senior Notes in February 2017. Refer to Note 9 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion of first mortgage bonds.

Interest expense increased $13 million for 2016 compared to 20152021 primarily due to a higher average long-term debt balance and higher variable interest expense from the issuance of $650 million of first mortgage bonds in October 2015, partially offset by the payment of a $426 million turbine purchase obligation in December 2015.rates.


Allowance for borrowed and equity fundsincreased $29$14 million, or 27%, for 20172022 compared to 20162021 primarily due to higher construction work-in-progress balances related to the construction of wind-powered generating facilitieswind- and the wind turbine repowering project.solar-powered generation projects.


Other, net increased $5 decreased $53 million, or 100%, for 20172022 compared to 20162021 primarily due to higher returns fromlower cash surrender values of corporate-owned life insurance policies of $37 million, higher non-service costs of postretirement employee benefit plans of $17 million and higher interest income from favorable cash positions,lower other investment values, partially offset by a gain of $5higher interest income.

Income tax benefit increased $95 million, in 2016 on the redemption of MidAmerican Energy's investments in auction rate securities.

Other, net increased $9 millionor 14%, for 20162022 compared to 2015 due to a gain of $5 million on the redemption of MidAmerican Energy's investments in auction rate securities and higher returns from corporate-owned life insurance policies.

MidAmerican Funding -

In addition to the fluctuations discussed above for MidAmerican Energy, MidAmerican Funding's other, net for 2017 reflects a pre-tax charge of $29 million from the early redemption of a portion of MidAmerican Funding's 6.927% Senior Bonds due 2029, for 2016 reflects income of $2 million from a partnership's sale of a real estate investment, for 2015 reflects a $13 million pre-tax gain on the sale of an investment in a generating facility lease.

Income Tax Benefit

MidAmerican Energy -

MidAmerican Energy's income tax benefit increased $51 million for 2017 compared to 2016,2021, and the effective tax rate was (43)(403)% for 20172022 and (32)(308)% for 2016.2021. The change in the effective tax rate was substantially due to an increase of $38$136 million in production tax credits and the effects of ratemaking,PTCs, partially offset by the impact of the 2017 Tax Reform and higher pre-tax income.

MidAmerican Energy'sstate income tax benefit on continuing operations decreased $15 million for 2016 compared to 2015, and the effective tax rate was (32)% for 2016 and (49)% for 2015. The change in the effective tax rate was substantially due to higher pre-tax income, partially offset by an increase of $39 million in production tax credits.impacts.


Federal renewable electricity production tax creditsPTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities is produced and sold and are based on a prescribed per-kilowatt rate pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law andlaw. Qualifying generating facilities are eligible for the credits for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in service.in-service. Beginning in late 2014, some of MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities surpassed the 10-year eligibility period and are no longerfor earning the credits. A credit per kilowatt hourMost of $0.024those facilities have since been repowered, and under IRS rules, qualifying repowered facilities are eligible for 2017the available credits, for 10 years from the date they are returned to service. Refer to "Capital Expenditures" in Liquidity and $0.023Capital Resources for 2016additional information about repowering and 2015 was applied to annual production, which resulted in $287new wind- and solar-powered generation placed in-service. PTC's totaled $710 million, $249$574 million and $210$510 million respectively, in production tax credits.2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.


MidAmerican Funding -


MidAmerican Funding's incomeIncome tax benefit for MidAmerican Funding increased $63$96 million, or 14%, for 20172022 compared to 2016,2021, and the effective tax rate was (54)(454)% for 20172022 and (35)(335)% for 2016. MidAmerican Funding's income tax benefit on continuing operations decreased $11 million for 2016 compared to 2015, and the effective tax rate was (35)% for 2016 and (51)% for 2015.2021. The change in effective tax rates was due principally to the factors discussed for MidAmerican Energy. Additionally, 2017 reflects an


246


Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

MidAmerican Energy -

Electric utility margin decreased $190 million, or 11%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to:
a $99 million increase in retail utility margin primarily due to $50 million from higher usage for certain industrial customers; $13 million from the favorable impact of weather; $19 million due to price impacts from changes in sales mix; $10 million, net of energy costs, from higher recoveries through bill riders (offset in operations and maintenance expense and income tax benefitbenefit) and $6 million from liquidated damages related to a wind-powered generation project. Retail customer volumes increased 5.8%; and
a $93 million increase in wholesale utility margin due to higher margins per unit of $52 million, reflecting higher market prices, net of higher energy costs, and higher volumes of 42.7%; partially offset by
a $2 million decrease in Multi-Value Projects ("MVP") transmission revenue.
Natural gas utility margin decreased $3 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to:
a $6 million decrease from higher refunds related to amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes arising from 2017 Tax Reform (offset in income tax benefit);
a $3 million decrease due to the unfavorable impact of weather, partially offset by price impacts from changes in sales mix; partially offset by
a $4 million increase in natural gas energy efficiency program revenue (offset in operations and maintenance expense); and
a $2 million increase in natural gas transportation margin, reflecting higher volumes.
Operations and maintenance increased $21 million, or 3%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due higher other generation operations and maintenance expenses of $7 million due to additional wind turbines and easements, higher energy efficiency program expense of $7 million (offset in operating revenue), higher natural gas distribution costs of $6 million and higher transmission operations costs from MISO of $3 million, partially offset by lower electric distribution costs of $11 million due to storm restoration costs in 2020.

Depreciation and amortization increased $198 million, or 28%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to $114 million from higher Iowa revenue sharing accruals, $25 million from a regulatory mechanism that provides customers the retail energy benefits of certain wind-powered generation projects and $59 million related to new and repowered wind-powered generating facilities and other plant placed in-service.

Property and other taxes increased $7 million, or 5%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher wind turbine property taxes.

Interest expense decreased $2 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to a decrease in a regulatory carrying charge and lower variable interest rates, partially offset by a higher average long-term debt balance.

Allowance for borrowed and equity funds decreased $8 million, or 13%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower construction work-in-progress balances related to wind-powered generation projects.

Other, net increased $1 million, or 2%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher cash surrender values of $29 million for the early redemptioncorporate-owned life insurance policies and lower non-service costs of postretirement employee benefit plans, partially offset by a portion of MidAmerican Funding's 6.927% Senior Bonds due 2029, and 2015 reflects income taxes on a $13 million gain from the salecontribution of land to a joint venture in 2020.

Income tax benefit increased $105 million, or 18%, for 2021 compared to 2020, and the effective tax rate was (308)% for 2021 and (223)% for 2020. The change in the effective tax rate was substantially due to an investmentincrease of $64 million in a generating facility lease.PTCs, state income tax impacts and lower pretax income in 2021.


MidAmerican Funding -

Income tax benefit for MidAmerican Funding increased $106 million, or 18%, for 2021 compared to 2020, and the effective tax rate was (335)% for 2021 and (235)% for 2020. The change in effective tax rates was due principally to the factors discussed for MidAmerican Energy.

247


Liquidity and Capital Resources


As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy's total net liquidity was $707 million consisting of $172 million of cash and cash equivalents and $905 million of credit facilities reduced by $370 million of the credit facilities reserved to support MidAmerican Energy's variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations. As of December 31, 2017, MidAmerican Funding's total net liquidity was $711 million, including MHC's $4 million credit facility.were as follows (in millions):

MidAmerican Energy:
Cash and cash equivalents$258 
Credit facilities, maturing 2023 and 20251,505 
Less:
Tax-exempt bond support(370)
Net credit facilities1,135 
MidAmerican Energy total net liquidity$1,393 
MidAmerican Funding:
MidAmerican Energy total net liquidity$1,393 
Cash and cash equivalents
MHC, Inc. credit facility, maturing 2023
MidAmerican Funding total net liquidity$1,400 

Cash Flows From
Operating Activities


MidAmerican Energy's net cash flows from operating activities were $1,396$2,174 million, $1,403$1,617 million and $1,351$1,543 million for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. MidAmerican Funding's net cash flows from operating activities were $1,380$2,161 million, $1,393$1,605 million and $1,335$1,536 million for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities decreasedincreased for 20172022 compared to 20162021 primarily due to lower income tax receipts and higher interest payments, partially offset by higher cashutility margins for MidAmerican Energy's regulated electric business, including a reduction in fuel inventories. The increase in net cashand natural gas businesses, higher income tax receipts and lower payments to vendors. Higher utility margins are partially attributable to timing of the recovery of higher natural gas costs caused by the February 2021 polar vortex weather event. Cash flows from operating activities increased for 20162021 compared to 2015 was2020 primarily due to higher cash margins for MidAmerican Energy's regulated electric business, partially offset by a growth in receivables net of payables,income tax receipts, lower derivative collateral cash flows, higher payments for asset retirement obligation settlements,the settlement of AROs and the timing of DSM cost recovery cash flows.lower interest payments.



MidAmerican Energy's income tax cash flows benefited in 2017, 2016 and 2015 from 50% bonus depreciation on qualifying assets placed in service and from production tax credits earned on qualifying projects. In December 2017, the 2017 Tax Reform was enacted which, among other items, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and eliminates bonus depreciation on qualifying regulated utility assets acquired after September 27, 2017, but did not impact production tax credits. MidAmerican Energy believes for qualifying assets acquired on or before September 27, 2017, bonus depreciation will be available for 2018 and 2019. MidAmerican Energy anticipates passing the benefits of lower tax expense to customers in the form of either rate reductions or rate base reductions. MidAmerican Energy expects lower revenue and income taxes as well as lower bonus depreciation benefits as a result of the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment. MidAmerican Energy does not expect the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment to have a material adverse impact on its cash flows, subject to actual regulatory outcomes. Refer to Regulatory Matters in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory matters associated with the 2017 Tax Reform. The timing of MidAmerican Energy's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.


Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rules provide for re-establishment of the production tax credit for an existing wind-powered generating facility upon the replacement of a significant portion of its components. Such component replacement is commonly referred to as repowering. If the degree of component replacement in such projects meets IRS guidelines, production tax credits are re-established for ten years at rates that depend upon the date in which construction begins, as noted in the above paragraph. MidAmerican Energy’s current repowering projects are expected to earn production tax credits at 100% of the value of such credits.

Cash Flows From Investing Activities


MidAmerican Energy's net cash flows from investing activities were $(1,874)$(1,867) million, $(1,615)$(1,911) million and $(1,450)$(1,826) million for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. MidAmerican Funding's net cash flows from investing activities were $(1,877)$(1,868) million, $(1,614)$(1,912) million and $(1,438)$(1,825) million for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Net cash flows from investing activities consist almost entirely of utility constructioncapital expenditures. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of utility constructioncapital expenditures. Purchases and proceeds related to available-for-salemarketable securities primarily consist of activity within the Quad Cities Generating Station nuclear decommissioning trust, and in 2016,other investment proceeds from the redemption of MidAmerican Energy's investments in auction rate securities. MidAmerican Funding received $13 million in 2015 relatedrelates primarily to the sale of an investment in a generating facility lease. Restricted cash and short-term investments activity for 2017 and 2016 relates to restricted proceeds from Solid Waste Facilities Revenue Bonds issued by the Iowa Finance Authority in 2017 and 2016, as discussed below.company-owned life insurance policies.


Cash Flows From Financing Activities


MidAmerican Energy's net cash flows from financing activities were $636$(278) million, $123$488 million and $173$(2) million for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. MidAmerican Funding's net cash flows from financing activities were $654$(262) million, $133$501 million and $176$4 million for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. In December 2017, the Iowa Finance Authority2022 MidAmerican Energy paid $275 million in dividends to its parent company, MHC, Inc. In July 2021, MidAmerican Energy issued $150$500 million of its variable-rate, tax-exempt Solid Waste Facilities Revenue Bonds due December 2047, the restricted proceeds of which were loaned to MidAmerican Energy for the purpose of constructing solid waste facilities. In February 2017, MidAmerican Energy issued $375 million of its 3.10% First Mortgage Bonds due May 2027 and $475 million of its 3.95%2.70% First Mortgage Bonds due August 2047. An amount equal2052. In 2022, MidAmerican Funding made a $69 million distribution to the net proceeds was used to finance capital expenditures disbursed during the period from February 2, 2016 to February 1, 2017, with respect to investments inits sole member, BHE. MidAmerican Energy's 551-megawatt Wind X and 2,000-megawatt Wind XI projects, which were previously financed with MidAmerican Energy's general funds. In February 2017, MidAmerican Energy redeemed in full through optional redemption its $250 million of 5.95% Senior Notes due July 2017. In December 2016, the Iowa Finance Authority issued $30 million of its variable-rate, tax-exempt Solid Waste Facilities Revenue Bonds due December 2046, the proceeds of which were loaned to MidAmerican Energy for the purpose of constructing solid waste facilities. In September 2016, the Iowa Finance Authority issued $33 million of variable-rate, tax-exempt Pollution Control Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds due September 2036, the proceeds of which were loaned to MidAmerican Energy to refinance, in September 2016, variable-rate tax-exempt pollution control refunding revenue bonds totaling $29 million due September 2016 and $4 million due March 2017, which were optionally redeemed in full. In October 2015, MidAmerican Energy issued $200 million of 3.50% First Mortgage Bonds due October 2024 and $450 million of 4.25% First Mortgage Bonds due May 2046. The net proceeds were used for the payment of a $426 million turbine purchase obligation due December 2015 and for general corporate purposes. Through its commercial paper program, MidAmerican Energy made repayments totaling $99Funding paid $189 million in 2017,2022 and received $99$12 million and $5 million in 20162021 and made repayments totaling $50 million in 2015.

In December 2017, MidAmerican Funding redeemed through a tender offer a portion of its 6.927% Senior Bonds. MidAmerican Funding received $133 million, $9 million and $3 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015,2020, respectively, through its note payable with BHE.


In February 2018, MidAmerican Energy issued $700 million of its 3.65% First Mortgage Bonds due August 2048.
248



Debt Authorizations and Related Matters


Short-term Debt

MidAmerican Energy has authority from the FERC to issue, through February 28, 2019,April 2, 2024, commercial paper and bank notes aggregating $905 million at interest rates not to exceed the applicable London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus a spread of 400 basis points.$1.5 billion. MidAmerican Energy has a $900 million$1.5 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 2020 for which MidAmerican Energy may request that the banks extend the credit facility up to two years.2025. The credit facility, which supports MidAmerican Energy's commercial paper program and its variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Eurodollar rate or a base rate, at MidAmerican Energy's option,Secured Overnight Financing Rate, plus a spread that varies based on MidAmerican Energy's credit ratings for senior unsecured long-term debt securities. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has a $5 million unsecured credit facility for general corporate purposes.


Long-term Debt and Preferred Stock

MidAmerican Energy currently has an effective shelf registration statement with the SEC to issue an indeterminate amountup to $3.25 billion of long-term debt securities and preferred stock through September 16, 2018. Additionally, following the February 2018 issuance of $700 million of first mortgage bonds,June 13, 2024. MidAmerican Energy has authorization from the FERC to issue, through August 31, 2019,June 30, 2023, long-term debt securities up to an aggregate of $2.0 billion and preferred stock up to an aggregate of $500 million andmillion. MidAmerican Energy has authorization from the ICC through May 25, 2025, to issue long-term debt securities up to an aggregate of $1.5$2.2 billion at interest rates not to exceed the applicable United States Treasury rate plus a spread of 175 basis points and from the ICC to issue preferred stock up to an aggregate of $500 million; through October 15, 2024, to issue $750 million through November 1, 2020, and additionalof long-term debt securities up to an aggregatefor the purpose of $1.5 billion,refinancing $250 million of whichits 3.70% Senior notes due September 2023 and $500 million expires March 15, 2019,of its 2.40% Senior notes due October 2024; and $1.0 billion expires Novemberthrough January 1, 2020.

In conjunction with the March 1999 merger, MidAmerican Energy committed2025, to the IUB to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain an investment grade rating on itsissue $105 million of long-term debt securities for the purpose of refinancing three of its variable-rate tax-exempt bond series, including $57 million due in May 2023, $35 million due in October 2024 and to maintain its common equity level above 42% of total capitalization unless circumstances beyond its control result$13 million due in the common equity level decreasing to below 39% of total capitalization. MidAmerican Energy must seek the approval of the IUB of a reasonable utility capital structure if January 2025.

MidAmerican Energy's common equity level decreases below 42% of total capitalization, unless the decrease is beyond the controlmortgage dated September 9, 2013, creates a lien on most of MidAmerican Energy. MidAmerican Energy is also required to seekEnergy's electric utility property within the approvalstate of Iowa, allowing the IUB if MidAmerican Energy's equity level decreases to below 39%, even if the decrease is due to circumstances beyond the controlissuance of MidAmerican Energy. If MidAmerican Energy's common equity level were to drop below the required thresholds, MidAmerican Energy's ability to issue debt could be restricted.bonds based on a percentage of eligible utility property additions, bond credits arising from retirement of previously outstanding bonds or deposits of cash. As of December 31, 2017, MidAmerican Energy's common equity ratio was 53% computed on a basis consistent with its commitment. As a result of MidAmerican Energy's regulatory commitment to maintain its common equity above certain thresholds,2022, MidAmerican Energy could dividend $2.1estimated it would be able to issue up to $9.3 billion of new first mortgage bonds under the mortgage. Any issuances are subject to market conditions, and amounts are further limited by regulatory authorizations and commitments, as well as any more restrictive requirements of December 31, 2017, without falling below 42%,covenants and tests contained in other financing agreements. MidAmerican Funding had restricted net assetsEnergy also has the ability to release property from the lien of $3.7 billion.the mortgage on the basis of property additions, bond credits or deposits of cash.


MidAmerican Funding or one of its subsidiaries, including MidAmerican Energy, may from time to time seek to acquire its outstanding debt securities through cash purchases in the open market, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Any debt securities repurchased by MidAmerican Funding or one of its subsidiaries may be reissued or resold by MidAmerican Funding or one of its subsidiaries from time to time and will depend on prevailing market conditions, the issuing company's liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.


Future Uses of Cash


MidAmerican Energy and MidAmerican Funding have available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the issuance of commercial paper, the use of unsecured revolving credit facilities, and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which MidAmerican Energy and MidAmerican Funding have access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including their credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.


Capital Expenditures


MidAmerican Energy's primary need forEnergy has significant future capital is utility construction expenditures.requirements. Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, impacts to customers' rates; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital.



249


MidAmerican Energy's historical and forecast capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Wind generation$911 $964 $685 $1,353 $1,288 $895 
Electric distribution273 257 311 296 250 259 
Electric transmission160 199 145 186 159 211 
Solar generation16 132 119 10 48 74 
Other476 360 609 606 404 352 
Total$1,836 $1,912 $1,869 $2,451 $2,149 $1,791 
 Historical Forecast
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
            
Wind-powered generation development$931
 $943
 $657
 $1,132
 $1,038
 $329
Wind-powered generation repowering
 67
 514
 248
 205
 123
Transmission Multi-Value Projects156
 119
 21
 46
 
 
Other359
 507
 581
 970
 468
 445
Total$1,446
 $1,636
 $1,773
 $2,396
 $1,711
 $897


MidAmerican Energy's historical and forecast capital expenditures includeprovided above consist of the following:
TheWind generation includes the construction, acquisition, repowering and operation of wind-powered generating facilities in Iowa.
Construction and acquisition of wind-powered generating facilities totaled $72 million for 2022, $540 million for 2021 and $848 million for 2020. The timing and amount of forecast wind generation capital expenditures may be impacted by the outcome of MidAmerican Energy's Wind PRIME filing currently before the IUB. MidAmerican Energy placed in-service 334 MW (nominal ratings)294 MWs during 2017, 600 MW (nominal ratings)2021 and 729 MWs during 2016 and 608 MW (nominal ratings) during 2015. In August 2016, the IUB issued an order approving ratemaking principles related to MidAmerican Energy's construction of up to 2,000 MW (nominal ratings) of additional wind-powered generating facilities, including the additions in 2017 and facilities expected to be placed in-service in 2018 and 2019. The ratemaking principles establish a cost cap of $3.6 billion, including AFUDC, and a fixed rate of return on equity of 11.0% over the proposed 40-year useful lives of those facilities in any future Iowa rate proceeding. The cost cap ensures that as long as total costs are below the cap, the investment will be deemed prudent in any future Iowa rate proceeding. Additionally, the ratemaking principles modify the revenue sharing mechanism currently in effect. The revised sharing mechanism will be effective in 2018 and will be triggered each year by actual equity returns exceeding a weighted average return on equity for MidAmerican Energy calculated annually. Pursuant to the change in revenue sharing, MidAmerican Energy will share 100% of the revenue in excess of this trigger with customers. Such revenue sharing will reduce coal and nuclear generation rate base, which is intended to mitigate future base rate increases. MidAmerican Energy expects all2020. All of these wind-powered generating facilities toplaced in-service in 2021 and 2020 qualify for 100% of federal production tax creditsPTCs available.
The repowering of certain existing wind-powered generating facilities in Iowa. This project entails the replacement of significant components of the oldest turbines in MidAmerican Energy's fleet. The energy production PTCs from such repowered facilities is expected to qualify for 100% of the federal production tax credits available for ten years following each facility's return to service. Under MidAmerican Energy's Iowa electric tariff, federal production tax credits related to facilities that were in-service prior to 2013 must be included in its Iowa energy adjustment clause. In August 2017, the IUB approved a tariff change that excludesthese projects are excluded from MidAmerican Energy's Iowa energy adjustment clause any future federal production tax credits related toEAC until these repowered facilities. In 2017,generation assets are reflected in base rates.
Repowering of wind-powered generating facilities accountingtotaled $500 million for 414 MW2022, $354 million for 2021 and $465$37 million offor 2020. Planned spending for repowering expenditures were placed in-service.
Transmission MVP investments. In 2012,totals $20 million in 2023. MidAmerican Energy startedexpects its repowered facilities to meet IRS guidelines for the re-establishment of PTCs for 10 years from the date the facilities are placed in-service.
Electric distribution includes expenditures for new facilities to meet retail demand growth and for replacement of existing facilities to maintain system reliability.
Electric transmission includes expenditures to meet retail demand growth, upgrades to accommodate third-party generator requirements and replacement of existing facilities to maintain system reliability.
Solar generation includes the construction of four MISO-approved MVPs locatedsolar-powered generating facilities totaling 141 MWs of small- and utility-scale solar generation, all of which were placed in-service in Iowa2022, with total spend of $119 million in 2022 and Illinois. When complete, the four MVPs will have added approximately 250 miles of 345 kV transmission line to$132 million in 2021. MidAmerican Energy is pursuing additional opportunities for solar generation, including those in MidAmerican Energy's transmission system and will be owned and operated by MidAmerican Energy. As of December 31, 2017, 224 miles of these MVP transmission lines have been placed in-service.Wind PRIME filing currently before the IUB.
Remaining expenditures primarily relate to routine operating projects for other generation, natural gas distribution, generation, transmissiontechnology, facilities and other infrastructure neededoperational needs to serve existing and expected demand.



Contractual Obligations

Material Cash Requirements

MidAmerican Energy and MidAmerican Funding have contractual cash obligationsrequirements that may affect their financial condition. The following table summarizes the material contractual cash obligations of MidAmerican Energycondition that arise primarily from long- and MidAmerican Funding as of December 31, 2017 (in millions):
 Payments Due By Periods  
   2019- 2021- 2023 and  
 2018 2020 2022 After Total
MidAmerican Energy:         
Long-term debt$350
 $503
 $
 $4,227
 $5,080
Interest payments on long-term debt(1) (2)
203
 371
 365
 2,621
 3,560
Coal, electricity and natural gas contract commitments(1)
268
 278
 159
 85
 790
Construction commitments(1)
790
 30
 
 
 820
Easements and operating leases(1)
22
 42
 42
 713
 819
Other commitments(1)
96
 221
 268
 233
 818
 1,729
 1,445
 834
 7,879
 11,887
          
MidAmerican Funding parent:         
Long-term debt
 
 
 239
 239
Interest payments on long-term debt(1)
17
 33
 33
 108
 191
 17
 33
 33
 347
 430
Total contractual cash obligations$1,746
 $1,478
 $867
 $8,226
 $12,317
(1)Not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)Includes interest payments for tax-exempt bond obligations with interest rates scheduled to reset periodically prior to maturity. Future variable interest rates are assumed to equal December 31, 2017 rates.

MidAmerican Energy has other types of commitments that relate primarily to construction expenditures (in "Utility Construction Expenditures" section above) and asset retirement obligations beyond 2017 (Note 12), which have not been included in the above table because the amount or timing of the cash payments is not certain. Refershort-term debt (refer to Notes 9, 127 and 158), firm commitments (refer to Note 13) and construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7) and AROs (refer to Note 11). Refer, where applicable, to the respective referenced note in Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.


MidAmerican Energy has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $5.6 billion on long-term debt, including $316 million due in 2023. Additionally, MidAmerican Funding has cash requirements relating to interest payments on its long-term debt of $109 million, including $17 million due in 2023.

250


Regulatory Matters


MidAmerican Energy is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussioninformation regarding MidAmerican Energy's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.


Quad Cities Generating Station Operating Status


ExelonConstellation Energy Generation, Company, LLC ("Exelon Generation"Constellation Energy"), the operator of Quad Cities Generating Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station") of which MidAmerican Energy has a 25% ownership interest, announced on June 2, 2016, its intention to shut downreceives financial support for continued operation of Quad Cities Station on June 1, 2018, as a result of Illinois not passing adequate legislation and Quad Cities Station not clearingfrom the 2019-2020 PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. capacity auction. MidAmerican Energy expressed to Exelon Generation its desire for the continued operation of the facility through the end of its operating license in 2032 and worked with Exelon Generation on solutions to that end. In December 2016, Illinois passed legislation creating a zero emission standard which went into effect June 1, 2017.enacted by the Illinois legislature in December 2016. The zero emission standard requires the Illinois Power Agency to purchase zero emission creditsZECs and recover the costs from certain ratepayers in Illinois, subject to certain limitations. The proceeds from the zero emission credits willZECs provide Exelon GenerationConstellation Energy additional revenue through 2027 as an incentive for continued operation of Quad Cities Station. For the nuclear assets already in rate base, MidAmerican Energy's customers will not be charged for the subsidy, and MidAmerican Energy willdoes not receive additional revenue from the subsidy.



On February 14, 2017, two lawsuits were filed withThe PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. ("PJM") capacity market includes a Minimum Offer Price Rule ("MOPR"). If a generation resource is subjected to a MOPR, its offer price in the United States District Court formarket is adjusted to effectively remove the Northern District of Illinois ("Northern District of Illinois") against the Illinois Power Agency alleging that the state’s zero emission creditrevenues it receives through a state government-provided financial support program violates certain provisions of the U.S. Constitution. Both complaints argue thatlike the Illinois zero emission credit program will distortstandard, resulting in a higher offer that may not clear the FERC’s energycapacity market. Prior to December 19, 2019, the PJM MOPR applied only to certain new gas-fueled resources.

On December 19, 2019, the FERC issued an order requiring the PJM to broadly apply the MOPR to all new and existing resources, including nuclear. This greatly expanded the breadth and scope of the PJM's MOPR, which became effective as of the PJM's capacity market auction system of setting wholesale prices. As majority owner and operator offor the 2022-2023 planning year. While the FERC included some limited exemptions, no exemptions were available to state-supported nuclear resources, such as Quad Cities Station, Exelon Generation intervened andStation. The FERC denied rehearing of that order on April 16, 2020. A number of parties, including Constellation Energy, have filed motions to dismisspetitions for review of the FERC's orders in both lawsuits. On July 14, 2017,this proceeding, which remain pending before the Northern District of Illinois granted the motions to dismiss. On July 17, 2017, the plaintiffs filed appeals with the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. Parties have filed briefs and presented oral argument. MidAmerican Energy cannot predict the outcome of these lawsuits.this proceeding.


On January 9, 2017,While this litigation is pending, the Electric Power Supply AssociationMOPR applied to Quad Cities Station in the capacity auction for the 2022-2023 planning year in May 2021, which prevented Quad Cities Station from clearing in that capacity auction.

At the direction of the PJM Board of Managers, the PJM and its stakeholders developed further MOPR reforms to ensure that the capacity market rules respect and accommodate state resource preferences such as the ZEC programs. The PJM filed two requestsrelated tariff revisions with the FERC seeking to expand Minimum Offer Price Rule ("MOPR")on July 30, 2021, and, on September 29, 2021, the PJM's proposed MOPR reforms became effective by operation of law. Under the new tariff provisions, to apply to existing resources receiving zero emission credit compensation. If successful, an expandedthe MOPR could resultapplied in an increased riskthe capacity auction for the 2023-2024 delivery year but did not restrict the offers of Quad Cities Station, not clearingwhich cleared in futurethe capacity auctionsauction. Requests for rehearing of the FERC's notice establishing the effective date for the PJM's proposed market reforms were filed in October 2021 and Exelon Generationdenied by operation of law on November 4, 2021. Several parties have filed petitions for review of the FERC's orders in this proceeding, which remain pending before the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

Assuming the continued effectiveness of the Illinois zero emission standard, Constellation Energy no longer receiving capacity revenues for the facility. As majority owner and operator ofconsiders Quad Cities Station Exelon Generation has filed proteststo be at heightened risk for early retirement. However, to the extent the Illinois zero emission standard does not operate as expected over its full term, Quad Cities Station would be at heightened risk for early retirement. The FERC provided no new mechanism for accommodating state-supported resources like Quad Cities Station other than the existing Fixed Resource Requirement ("FRR") mechanism under which an entire utility zone would be removed from PJM's capacity auction along with sufficient resources to support the load in response to each filing. The timing of the FERC’s decision with respect to both proceedings is currently unknown andsuch zone. Depending on the outcome of these matters is currently uncertain.the proceedings related to the PJM MOPR, the continued effectiveness of the Illinois zero emission standard may be undermined unless the PJM adopts further changes to the MOPR or Illinois implements an FRR mechanism, under which Quad Cities Station would be removed from the PJM's capacity auction.


251


Environmental Laws and Regulations


MidAmerican Energy is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact itsMidAmerican Energy's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. All suchMidAmerican Energy believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to a range of interpretation whichthat may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and MidAmerican Energy is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results. MidAmerican Energy believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.


Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for additional informationfurther discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for MidAmerican Energy's forecast environmental-related capital expenditures.regulations.


Collateral and Contingent Features


Debt securities of MidAmerican Energy are rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of MidAmerican Energy's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt securities. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time. As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. As a result of the issuance of first mortgage bonds by MidAmerican Energy in September 2013, its then outstanding senior unsecured debt was equally and ratably secured with such first mortgage bonds. Refer to Note 98 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of MidAmerican Energy's first mortgage bonds.


MidAmerican Funding and MidAmerican Energy have no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of its outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. MidAmerican Energy's unsecured revolving credit facilities do not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon their availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facilities are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.



In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base MidAmerican Energy's collateral requirements on its credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in MidAmerican Energy's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy would have been required to post $114$128 million of additional collateral. MidAmerican Energy's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors. Refer to Note 13 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of MidAmerican Energy's collateral requirements specific to its derivative contracts.


Inflation


Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where MidAmerican Energy operates have not had a significant impact on its financial results. MidAmerican Energy operates under cost-of-service based raterate-setting structures administered by various state commissions and the FERC. Under these raterate-setting structures, MidAmerican Energy is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation. MidAmerican Energy attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of fuel, energy and other cost adjustment clauses and bill riders, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, inflation's impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs, and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.


252
New Accounting Pronouncements



For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting MidAmerican Energy and MidAmerican Funding, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates


Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by MidAmerican Energy's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with MidAmerican Energy's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 2 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


MidAmerican Energy prepares its financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, MidAmerican Energy defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.


MidAmerican Energy continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition, that could limit MidAmerican Energy's ability to recover its costs. MidAmerican Energy believes theits application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate, and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $204$550 million and total regulatory liabilities were $1,661$1,119 million as of December 31, 2017.2022. Refer to Note 65 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding regulatory assets and liabilities.



Income Taxes

In determining MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by MidAmerican Energy's various regulatory jurisdictions. MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. MidAmerican Funding and MidAmerican Energy recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of their federal, state and local tax examinations is uncertain, each company believes it has made adequate provisions for its income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations, if any, is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. Refer to Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding income taxes.

It is probable that MidAmerican Energy will pass income tax benefits and expenses related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to its customers. As of December 31, 2017, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $681 million and will be included in regulated rates when the associated temporary differences reverse.

Impairment of Goodwill


MidAmerican Funding's Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017,2022, includes goodwill from the acquisition of MHC totaling $1.3 billion. Goodwill is allocated to each reporting unit. MidAmerican Funding evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31.31, 2022. Additionally, no indicators of impairment were identified as of December 31, 2017.2022. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. MidAmerican Funding uses a variety of methods to estimate a reporting unit's fair value, principally discounted projected future net cash flows. Key assumptions used include, but are not limited to, the use of estimated future cash flows; multiples of earnings; and an appropriate discount rate. Estimated future cash flows are impacted by, among other factors, growth rates, changes in regulations and rates, ability to renew contracts and estimates of future commodity prices. In estimating future cash flows, MidAmerican Funding incorporates current market information, as well as historical factors.


Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits


MidAmerican Energy sponsors defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans that cover the majority of the employees of BHE and its domestic energy subsidiaries other than PacifiCorp and NV Energy Inc. MidAmerican Energy recognizes the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans on the Balance Sheets. Funded status is the fair value of plan assets minus the benefit obligation as of the measurement date. As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy recognized a net liability totaling $23$99 million for the funded status of its defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. As of December 31, 2017,2022, amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that were included in regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities totaled $38 million and $41 million, respectively.$47 million.


253


The expense and benefit obligations relating to these defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans are based on actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions, including, but not limited to, discount rates, expected long-term rate of return on plan assets and healthcare cost trend rates. These key assumptions are reviewed annually and modified as appropriate. MidAmerican Energy believes that the key assumptions utilized in recording obligations under the plans are reasonable based on prior plan experience and current market and economic conditions. Refer to Note 1110 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for disclosures about MidAmerican Energy's defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans, including the key assumptions used to calculate the funded status and net periodic benefit cost for these plans as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022.


MidAmerican Energy chooses a discount rate based upon high quality debt security investment yields in effect as of the measurement date that corresponds to cash flows over the expected benefit period. The pension and other postretirement benefit liabilities increase as the discount rate is reduced.



In establishing its assumption as to the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, MidAmerican Energy utilizes the expected asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets. Pension and other postretirement benefits expense increases as the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets decreases. MidAmerican Energy regularly reviews its actual asset allocations and rebalances its investments to its targeted allocations when considered appropriate.


MidAmerican Energy chooses a healthcare cost trend rate that reflects the near and long-term expectations of increases in medical costs and corresponds to the expected benefit payment periods. The healthcare cost trend rate is assumed to gradually decline to 5%5.00% by 20252028 at which point the rate of increase is assumed to remain constant. Refer to Note 11 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for healthcare cost trend rate sensitivity disclosures.


The key assumptions used may differ materially from period to period due to changing market and economic conditions. These differences may result in a significant impact to pension and other postretirement benefits expense and the funded status. If changes were to occur for the following key assumptions, the approximate effect on the Financial Statements of the total plan before allocations to affiliates would be as follows (in millions):
Other Postretirement
Pension PlansBenefit Plans
+0.5%-0.5%+0.5%-0.5%
Effect on December 31, 2022 Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate$(22)$24 $(9)$10 
Effect on 2022 Periodic Cost:
Discount rate(1)— — 
Expected rate of return on plan assets(3)(1)
   Other Postretirement
 Pension Plans Benefit Plans
 +0.5% -0.5% +0.5% -0.5%
Effect on December 31, 2017 Benefit Obligations:       
Discount rate$(38) $42
 $(10) $10
        
Effect on 2017 Periodic Cost:       
Discount rate1
 (2) 
 
Expected rate of return on plan assets(3) 3
 (1) 1


A variety of factors affect the funded status of the plans, including asset returns, discount rates, plan changes and MidAmerican Energy's funding policy for each plan.


Income Taxes

In determining MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by MidAmerican Energy's various regulatory commissions. MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. MidAmerican Funding and MidAmerican Energy recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of their federal, state and local tax examinations is uncertain, each company believes it has made adequate provisions for its income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. Refer to Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding income taxes.

254


It is probable that MidAmerican Energy will either refund to, or recover from its customers in certain state jurisdiction income tax benefits and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences, and other various differences. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $72 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue


Revenue from electric and natural gas customers is recognized as electricity or natural gas is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of customer meters and applicable rates. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $89$102 million as of December 31, 2017.2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energyrevenue include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Unbilled revenue is reversed in the following month, and billed revenue is recorded based on the subsequent meter readings.



Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


MidAmerican Energy's Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. MidAmerican Energy's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which it transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with MidAmerican Energy's business activities. MidAmerican Energy has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to NotesNote 2 and 13 of Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding MidAmerican Energy's contracts accounted for as derivatives.



Commodity Price Risk


MidAmerican Energy is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. MidAmerican Energy is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk as it has an obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather; market liquidity; generating facility availability; customer usage; storage; and transmission and transportation constraints. Commodity price risk for MidAmerican Energy's regulated retail electricity and natural gas operations is significantly mitigated by the inclusion of energy costs in energy cost rider mechanisms, which permit the current recovery of such costs from its retail customers. MidAmerican Energy uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements to mitigate price volatility on behalf of its customers. MidAmerican Energy does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities, and following the January 1, 2016 transfer of MidAmerican Energy's unregulated retail services business to a subsidiary of BHE, MidAmerican Energy no longer provides nonregulated retail electricity and natural gas services in competitive markets.activities.


Interest Rate Risk


MidAmerican Energy and MidAmerican Funding are exposed to interest rate risk on their outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. MidAmerican Energy and MidAmerican Funding manage interest rate risk by limiting their exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, the fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose MidAmerican Energy or MidAmerican Funding to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if MidAmerican Energy or MidAmerican Funding were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. MidAmerican Energy or MidAmerican Funding may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate their exposure to interest rate risk. The nature and amount of their short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 7, 8 9 and 1412 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of MidAmerican Energy's and MidAmerican Funding's short- and long-term debt.


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, MidAmerican Energy had short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $370 million and $319 million, respectively, that expose MidAmerican Energy to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. The market risk related to MidAmerican Energy's variable-rate debt as of December 31, 2017,2022, is not hedged. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on MidAmerican Energy's annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


255


Credit Risk


MidAmerican Energy is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy participates in the regional transmission organization ("RTO")RTO markets and has indirect credit exposure related to other participants, although RTO credit policies are designed to limit exposure to credit losses from individual participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent MidAmerican Energy's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, MidAmerican Energy analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty, and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, MidAmerican Energy enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, MidAmerican Energy exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.


Substantially all of MidAmerican Energy's electric wholesale sales revenue results from participation in RTOs, including the MISO and the PJM. MidAmerican Energy's share of historical losses from defaults by other RTO market participants has not been material. Additionally, as of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy's aggregate direct credit exposure from electric wholesale marketing counterparties was not material.



256
Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data



Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

MidAmerican Energy Company



MidAmerican Funding, LLC and Subsidiaries




257




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
MidAmerican Energy Company
Des Moines, Iowa


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of MidAmerican Energy Company ("MidAmerican Energy") as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, and2021, the related statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(ii) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MidAmerican Energy as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of MidAmerican Energy's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on MidAmerican Energy's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to MidAmerican Energy in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. MidAmerican Energy is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of MidAmerican Energy’sEnergy's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 5 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

MidAmerican Energy is subject to rate regulation by state public service commissions as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where MidAmerican Energy operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

258


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow MidAmerican Energy an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While MidAmerican Energy has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit MidAmerican Energy's ability to recover their costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, and (3) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated MidAmerican Energy's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected MidAmerican Energy's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
February 23, 201824, 2023


We have served as MidAmerican Energy's auditor since 1999.



259


MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$258 $232 
Trade receivables, net536 526 
Income tax receivable42 79 
Inventories277 234 
Prepayments91 71 
Other current assets66 52 
Total current assets1,270 1,194 
Property, plant and equipment, net21,091 20,301 
Regulatory assets550 473 
Investments and restricted investments902 1,026 
Other assets165 263 
Total assets$23,978 $23,257 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
    
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$172
 $14
Receivables, net344
 285
Income taxes receivable51
 9
Inventories245
 264
Other current assets134
 35
Total current assets946
 607
    
Property, plant and equipment, net14,207
 12,821
Regulatory assets204
 1,161
Investments and restricted cash and investments728
 653
Other assets233
 217
    
Total assets$16,318
 $15,459


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

260


MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$536 $531 
Accrued interest85 84 
Accrued property, income and other taxes170 158 
Current portion of long-term debt317 — 
Other current liabilities93 145 
Total current liabilities1,201 918 
Long-term debt7,412 7,721 
Regulatory liabilities1,119 1,080 
Deferred income taxes3,433 3,389 
Asset retirement obligations683 714 
Other long-term liabilities485 475 
Total liabilities14,333 14,297 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Shareholder's equity:
Common stock - 350 shares authorized, no par value, 71 shares issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital561 561 
Retained earnings9,084 8,399 
Total shareholder's equity9,645 8,960 
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$23,978 $23,257 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
    
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$452
 $303
Accrued interest48
 45
Accrued property, income and other taxes132
 137
Short-term debt
 99
Current portion of long-term debt350
 250
Other current liabilities128
 159
Total current liabilities1,110
 993
    
Long-term debt4,692
 4,051
Deferred income taxes2,237
 3,572
Regulatory liabilities1,661
 883
Asset retirement obligations528
 510
Other long-term liabilities326
 290
Total liabilities10,554
 10,299
    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
 
    
Shareholder's equity:   
Common stock - 350 shares authorized, no par value, 71 shares issued and outstanding
 
Additional paid-in capital561
 561
Retained earnings5,203
 4,599
Total shareholder's equity5,764
 5,160
    
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$16,318
 $15,459


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



261


MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$2,988 $2,529 $2,139 
Regulated natural gas and other1,037 1,018 581 
Total operating revenue4,025 3,547 2,720 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy679 539 339 
Cost of natural gas purchased for resale and other763 761 328 
Operations and maintenance828 775 754 
Depreciation and amortization1,168 914 716 
Property and other taxes149 142 135 
Total operating expenses3,587 3,131 2,272 
Operating income438 416 448 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(313)(302)(304)
Allowance for borrowed funds15 13 15 
Allowance for equity funds51 39 45 
Other, net— 53 52 
Total other income (expense)(247)(197)(192)
Income before income tax benefit191 219 256 
Income tax benefit(770)(675)(570)
Net income$961 $894 $826 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:     
Regulated electric$2,108
 $1,985
 $1,837
Regulated gas and other729
 640
 665
Total operating revenue2,837
 2,625
 2,502
      
Operating costs and expenses:     
Cost of fuel, energy and capacity434
 409
 433
Cost of gas sold and other442
 367
 398
Operations and maintenance781
 693
 705
Depreciation and amortization500
 479
 407
Property and other taxes119
 112
 110
Total operating costs and expenses2,276
 2,060
 2,053
      
Operating income561
 565
 449
      
Other income and (expense):     
Interest expense(214) (196) (183)
Allowance for borrowed funds15
 8
 8
Allowance for equity funds41
 19
 20
Other, net19
 14
 5
Total other income and (expense)(139) (155) (150)
      
Income before income tax benefit422
 410
 299
Income tax benefit(183) (132) (147)
      
Income from continuing operations605
 542
 446
      
Discontinued operations (Note 3):     
Income from discontinued operations
 
 22
Income tax expense
 
 6
Income on discontinued operations
 
 16
      
Net income$605
 $542
 $462


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.



262


MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOMECHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)

AdditionalTotal
CommonPaid-inRetainedShareholder's
StockCapitalEarningsEquity
Balance, December 31, 2019$— $561 $6,679 $7,240 
Net income— — 826 826 
Other equity transactions— — (1)(1)
Balance, December 31, 2020— 561 7,504 8,065 
Net income— — 894 894 
Other equity transactions— — 
Balance, December 31, 2021— 561 8,399 8,960 
Net income— — 961 961 
Common stock dividends— — (275)(275)
Other equity transactions— — (1)(1)
Balance, December 31, 2022$— $561 $9,084 $9,645 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net income$605
 $542
 $462
      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $-, $1 and $-
 3
 
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $-, $- and $(4)
 
 (7)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 3
 (7)
      
Comprehensive income$605
 $545
 $455


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)


263
     Accumulated  
     Other  
 Common Retained Comprehensive Total
 Stock Earnings Loss, Net Equity
        
Balance, December 31, 2014$561
 $3,712
 $(23) $4,250
Net income
 462
 
 462
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (7) (7)
Balance, December 31, 2015561
 4,174
 (30) 4,705
Net income
 542
 
 542
Other comprehensive income
 
 3
 3
Dividend (Note 3)
 (117) 27
 (90)
Balance, December 31, 2016561
 4,599
 
 5,160
Net income
 605
 
 605
Other equity transactions
 (1) 
 (1)
Balance, December 31, 2017$561
 $5,203
 $
 $5,764



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$961 $894 $826 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization1,168 914 716 
Amortization of utility plant to other operating expenses35 34 34 
Allowance for equity funds(51)(39)(45)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits33 153 208 
Settlements of asset retirement obligations(85)(103)(124)
Other, net51 21 (18)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(11)(293)48 
Inventories(43)44 (52)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net(4)(19)
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net40 (71)(64)
Accounts payable and other liabilities68 67 33 
Net cash flows from operating activities2,174 1,617 1,543 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(1,869)(1,912)(1,836)
Purchases of marketable securities(499)(213)(281)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities492 207 269 
Proceeds from sales of other investments— — 
Other investment proceeds
Other, net11 
Net cash flows from investing activities(1,867)(1,911)(1,826)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Common stock dividends(275)— — 
Proceeds from long-term debt— 492 — 
Repayments of long-term debt(2)(1)— 
Other, net(1)(3)(2)
Net cash flows from financing activities(278)488 (2)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents29 194 (285)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year239 45 330 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of year$268 $239 $45 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$605
 $542
 $462
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization500
 479
 407
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits332
 361
 275
Changes in other assets and liabilities37
 47
 49
Other, net(59) (91) (58)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:     
Receivables, net(58) (61) 91
Inventories19
 (27) (53)
Derivative collateral, net2
 5
 33
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net(11) (6) (8)
Accounts payable69
 39
 (76)
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net(41) 107
 217
Other current assets and liabilities1
 8
 12
Net cash flows from operating activities1,396
 1,403
 1,351
      
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Utility construction expenditures(1,773) (1,636) (1,446)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities(143) (138) (142)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities137
 158
 135
Net increase in restricted cash and short-term investments(98) (10) 
Other, net3
 11
 3
Net cash flows from investing activities(1,874) (1,615) (1,450)
      
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from long-term debt990
 62
 649
Repayments of long-term debt(255) (38) (426)
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt(99) 99
 (50)
Net cash flows from financing activities636
 123
 173
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents158
 (89) 74
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year14
 103
 29
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$172
 $14
 $103



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.





264


MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(1)
Company Organization

(1)Organization and Operations

MidAmerican Energy Company ("MidAmerican Energy") is a public utility with electric and natural gas operations and is the principal subsidiary of MHC Inc. ("MHC"). MHC is a holding company that conducts no business other than the ownership of its subsidiaries and related corporate services.subsidiaries. MHC's nonregulated subsidiaries includesubsidiary is Midwest Capital Group, Inc. and MEC Construction Services Co. MHC is the direct wholly owned subsidiary of MidAmerican Funding, LLC ("MidAmerican Funding"), which is an Iowa limited liability company with Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE") as its sole member. BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa, that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").


(2)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(2)Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis ofPresentation

The Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements


The preparation of the Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Financial Statements.


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


MidAmerican Energy's utility operations are subject to the regulation of the Iowa Utilities Board ("IUB"), the Illinois Commerce Commission ("ICC"), the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). MidAmerican Energy's accounting policies and the accompanying Financial Statements conform to GAAP applicable to rate-regulated enterprises and reflect the effects of the ratemaking process.


MidAmerican Energy prepares its financial statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, MidAmerican Energy defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

MidAmerican Energy continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition, that could limit MidAmerican Energy's ability to recover its costs. MidAmerican Energy believes the application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate, and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").


Fair Value Measurements


As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered inwhen determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.



265


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and InvestmentsCash Equivalents


Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, United StatesU.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted amounts are included in other current assetscash and cash equivalents consist substantially of funds restricted for wildlife preservation. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and investmentscash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 as presented in the Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Balance Sheets.Sheets (in millions):

As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$258 $232 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents in other current assets10 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$268 $239 

Investments


Fixed Maturity Securities

MidAmerican Energy's management determines the appropriate classification of investments in debt and equityfixed maturity securities at the acquisition date and reevaluates the classification at each balance sheet date. Investments that management does not intend to use or is restricted from using in current operations are presented as noncurrent on the Balance Sheets.


Available-for-sale securitiesinvestments are carried at fair value with realized gains and losses, as determined on a specific identification basis, recognized in earnings and unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI, net of tax. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on fixed maturity securities in a trust related to the decommissioning of the Quad Cities Generating Station Units 1 and 2 ("Quad Cities Station") are recorded as a net regulatory liability because MidAmerican Energy expects to recoverrefund to customers any decommissioning funds in excess of costs for these activities through regulated rates. Trading investments are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings. Held-to-maturity securities are carried at amortized cost, reflecting the ability and intent to hold the securities to maturity. The difference between the original cost and maturity value of a fixed maturity security is amortized to earnings using the interest method.


Investments gains and losses arise when investments are sold (as determined on a specific identification basis) or are other-than-temporarily impaired.impaired with respect to securities classified as available-for-sale. If a decline inthe value of ana fixed maturity investment declines to below amortized cost and the decline is deemed other than temporary, the amortized cost of the investment is written downreduced to fair value, with a corresponding charge to earnings. Factors considered in judging whether an impairment is other than temporary include: the financial condition, business prospects and creditworthiness of the issuer; the relative amount of the decline; MidAmerican Energy's ability and intent to hold the investment until the fair value recovers; and the length of time that fair value has been less than cost. Impairment losses on equity securities are charged to earnings. With respect to an investment in a debt security, anyAny resulting impairment loss is recognized in earnings if MidAmerican Energy intends to sell, or expects to be required to sell, the debt security before its amortized cost is recovered. If MidAmerican Energy does not expect to ultimately recover the amortized cost basis even if it does not intend to sell the security, the credit loss component is recognized in earnings and any difference between fair value and the amortized cost basis, net of the credit loss, is reflected in other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI"). For regulated investments, any impairment charge is offset by the establishment of a regulatory asset to the extent recovery in regulated rates is probable.


Equity Securities

All changes in fair value of equity securities in a trust related to the decommissioning of nuclear generation assets are recorded as a net regulatory liability since MidAmerican Energy expects to refund to customers any decommissioning funds in excess of costs for these activities through regulated rates.

266


Allowance for Doubtful AccountsCredit Losses


ReceivablesTrade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts.credit losses. The allowance for doubtful accountscredit losses is based on MidAmerican Energy's assessment of the collectibilitycollectability of amounts owed to it by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,In measuring the allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $7 millioncredit losses for trade receivables, MidAmerican Energy primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, it may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. The change in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Balance Sheets.Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):


202220212020
Beginning balance$12 $12 $
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net11 10 12 
Write-offs, net(9)(10)(5)
Ending balance$14 $12 $12 

Derivatives


MidAmerican Energy employs a number of different derivative contracts, including forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage price risk for electricity, natural gas and other commodities, and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements. Cash collateral received from or paid to counterparties to secure derivative contract assets or liabilities in excess of amounts offset is included in other current assets on the Balance Sheets.


Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked to market, and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of sales on the Statements of Operations.


For MidAmerican Energy's derivatives not designated as hedging contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities.


For MidAmerican Energy's derivatives designated as hedging contracts, MidAmerican Energy formally assesses, at inception and thereafter, whether the hedging contract is highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged item. MidAmerican Energy formally documents hedging activity by transaction type and risk management strategy. Changes in the estimated fair value of a derivative contract designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge, to the extent effective, are included on the Statements of Changes in Equity as AOCI, net of tax, until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings. All of MidAmerican Energy's derivatives designated as cash flow hedges and the related AOCI were transferred to a subsidiary of BHE on January 1, 2016, as discussed in Note 3.


Inventories


Inventories consist mainly of coal stocks,materials and supplies, totaling $117$175 million and $137$135 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, materials and supplies,coal stocks, totaling $100$68 million and $99$63 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, and natural gas in storage, totaling $24$27 million and $30 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021, respectively. The cost of materials and supplies, coal stocks and fuel oil is determined using the average cost method. The cost of stored natural gas is determined using the last-in-first-out method. With respect to stored natural gas, the replacement cost would be $22 million and $27 million higher as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.


UtilityProperty, Plant and Equipment, Net


General


Additions to utility plant are recorded at cost. MidAmerican Energy capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC") and equity AFUDC. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has regulatory arrangements in Iowa in which the carrying cost of certain utility plant has been reduced for amounts associated with electric returns on equity exceeding specified thresholds and retail energy benefits associated with certain wind-powered generation. Amounts expensed under this arrangementthese arrangements are included as a component of depreciation and amortization.


267


Depreciation and amortization for MidAmerican Energy's utility operations are computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by its various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by MidAmerican Energy to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.


Generally, when MidAmerican Energy retires or sells a component of utility plant, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of nonregulated assets is recorded through earnings.


Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of its regulated facilities, is capitalized by MidAmerican Energy as a component of utility plant, with offsetting credits to the Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the FERC. After construction is completed, MidAmerican Energy is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.


Asset Retirement Obligations


MidAmerican Energy recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. MidAmerican Energy's AROs are primarily related to decommissioning of the Quad Cities Station and obligations associated with its other generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to utility plant) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in utility plant, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.



Impairment


MidAmerican Energy evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including utilityproperty, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. Additionally, when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets, MidAmerican Energy considers the impact of regulation on recoverability. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value. The impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets. For all other assets,and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Statements of Operations.


Revenue Recognition


MidAmerican Energy uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which MidAmerican Energy expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services. MidAmerican Energy records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Statements of Operations.

A majority of MidAmerican Energy's energy revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission, distribution and natural gas and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided.

Revenue from electric and natural gas customers is recognized as electricity or natural gas is delivered or services are provided. Revenue recognized includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, unbilled revenue was $89$102 million and $87$85 million, respectively, and is included in trade receivables, net on the Balance Sheets.


268


The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of customer meters and applicable rates. At the end of each month, amounts of energy provided to customers since the date of the last meter reading are estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energyrevenue include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses economic impacts and composition of customer classes. Unbilled revenue is reversed in the following month and billed revenue is recorded based on the subsequent meter readings.


All of MidAmerican Energy's regulated retail electric and natural gas sales are subject to energy adjustment clauses. MidAmerican Energy also has costs that are recovered, at least in part, through bill riders, including demand-side management and certain transmission costs. The clauses and riders allow MidAmerican Energy to adjust the amounts charged for electric and natural gas service as the related costs change. The costs recovered in revenue through use of the adjustment clauses and bill riders are charged to expense in the same year the related revenue is recognized. At any given time, these costs may be over or under collected from customers. The total under collection included in trade receivables, net at December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, was $72$156 million and $31$230 million, respectively.

MidAmerican Energy collects from its customers sales and excise taxes assessed by governmental authorities on transactions with customers and later remits the collected taxes to the appropriate authority. If the obligation to pay a particular tax resides with the customer, MidAmerican Energy reports such taxes collected on a net basis and, accordingly, they do not affect the Statement of Operations. Taxes for which the obligation resides with MidAmerican Energy are reported on a gross basis in operating revenue and operating expenses. The amounts reported on a gross basis are not material.


Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs


Premiums, discounts and issuance costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.


Income Taxes


Berkshire Hathaway includes MidAmerican Funding and MidAmerican Energy in its consolidated United StatesU.S. federal and Iowa state income tax return.returns. MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's provisions for income taxes have been computed on a stand-alone basis.


Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using estimatedenacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with components of OCI are charged or credited directly to OCI. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("2017 Tax Reform") was signed into law which, among other items, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with income tax benefits and expense for the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that MidAmerican Energy deems probable to be passed on to its customers in most state jurisdictions are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are generally deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties or as prescribed by various regulatory jurisdictions.commissions.



In determining MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by MidAmerican Energy's various regulatory jurisdictions. MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. MidAmerican Funding and MidAmerican Energy recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of their federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, each company believes it has made adequate provisions for its income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations, if any, is not expected to have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. MidAmerican Funding's and MidAmerican Energy's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in taxes accrued and other long-term liabilities on their respective Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-07, which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 715, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits." The amendments in this guidance require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statement of operations separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of operating income. Additionally, the guidance only allows the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. This guidance must be adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of operations and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component in the balance sheet. MidAmerican Energy adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018, and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, which amends FASB ASC Subtopic 230-10, “Statement of Cash Flows - Overall.” The amendments in this guidance require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively, wherein the statement of cash flows of each period presented should be adjusted to reflect the new guidance. MidAmerican Energy adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018, and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, which amends FASB ASC Topic 230, "Statement of Cash Flows." The amendments in this guidance address the classification of eight specific cash flow issues within the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. MidAmerican Energy adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018, and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, which creates FASB ASC Topic 842, "Leases" and supersedes Topic 840 "Leases." This guidance increases transparency and comparability among entities by recording lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. A lessee should recognize in the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-01 that provides for an optional transition practical expedient allowing companies to not have to evaluate existing land easements if they were not previously accounted for under ASC Topic 840, "Leases." This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. MidAmerican Energy plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2019, and is currently evaluating the impact on its Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Financial Statements.


In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, which amends FASB ASC Subtopic 825-10, "Financial Instruments - Overall." The amendments in this guidance address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments including a requirement that all investments in equity securities that do not qualify for equity method accounting or result in consolidation of the investee be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption not permitted, and is required to be adopted prospectively by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. MidAmerican Energy adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018, and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Financial Statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which creates FASB ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and supersedes ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition." The guidance replaces industry-specific guidance and establishes a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, the guidance requires the entity to disclose further quantitative and qualitative information regarding the nature and amount of revenues arising from contracts with customers, as well as other information about the significant judgments and estimates used in recognizing revenues from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No.2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 one year to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued several ASUs that clarify the implementation guidance for ASU No. 2014-09 but do not change the core principle of the guidance. This guidance may be adopted retrospectively or under a modified retrospective method where the cumulative effect is recognized at the date of initial application. MidAmerican Energy adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018, under the modified retrospective method and the adoption will not have an impact on its Financial Statements but will increase the disclosures included within Notes to Financial Statements. The timing and amount of revenue recognized after adoption of the new guidance will not be different than before as a majority of revenue is recognized equal to what MidAmerican Energy has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of MidAmerican Energy's performance to date. MidAmerican Energy's current plan is to quantitatively disaggregate revenue in the required financial statement footnote by customer class for each segment.

(3)
Discontinued Operations

On January 1, 2016, MidAmerican Energy transferred the assets and liabilities of its unregulated retail services business to a subsidiary of BHE. The transfer was made at MidAmerican Energy's carrying value of the assets, liabilities and AOCI as of December 31, 2015, totaling $90 million, and was recorded by MidAmerican Energy as a noncash dividend. Financial results of the unregulated retail services business for the year ended December 31, 2015 have been reclassified to discontinued operations in the Statement of Operations. Significant line items constituting pre-tax income from discontinued operations and total cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31 are as follows (in millions):
269
  2015
   
Operating revenue $905
Cost of sales $854
   
Cash flows from operating activities $30




(4)(3)Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):

Depreciable Life20222021
Utility plant:
Generation20-62 years$18,582 $17,397 
Transmission55-80 years2,662 2,474 
Electric distribution15-80 years4,931 4,661 
Natural gas distribution30-75 years2,144 2,039 
Utility plant in-service28,319 26,571 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(8,024)(7,376)
Utility plant in-service, net20,295 19,195 
Nonregulated property, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization20-50 years
20,301 19,201 
Construction work-in-progress790 1,100 
Property, plant and equipment, net$21,091 $20,301 
 Depreciable Life 2017 2016
      
Utility plant in service:     
Generation20-70 years $12,107
 $11,282
Transmission52-75 years 1,838
 1,726
Electric distribution20-75 years 3,380
 3,197
Gas distribution29-75 years 1,640
 1,565
Utility plant in service  18,965
 17,770
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (5,561) (5,448)
Utility plant in service, net  13,404
 12,322
Nonregulated property, net:     
Nonregulated property gross20-50 years 7
 7
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (1) (1)
Nonregulated property, net  6
 6
   13,410
 12,328
Construction work-in-progress  797
 493
Property, plant and equipment, net  $14,207
 $12,821


Nonregulated property, includesnet consists primarily of land computer software and other assets not recoverable for regulated utility purposes.


The average depreciation and amortization rates applied to depreciable utility plant for the years ended December 31 were as follows:
202220212020
Electric3.2 %3.3 %3.2 %
Natural gas2.9 %2.8 %2.8 %
 2017 2016 2015
      
Electric2.6% 2.8% 3.0%
Gas2.7% 2.9% 2.9%

During the fourth quarter of 2016,Under a revenue sharing arrangement in Iowa, MidAmerican Energy revised its electric and gas depreciation ratesaccrues throughout the year a regulatory liability based on the results of a newextent to which its anticipated annual equity return exceeds specified thresholds, with an equal amount recorded in depreciation study,and amortization expense. For the most significant impact of which was longer estimated useful lives for certain wind-powered generating facilities. The effect of this change was to reduceyears ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, $296 million, $115 million, and $— million, respectively, is reflected in depreciation and amortization expense by $3 million in 2016 and $34 million annually based on depreciable plant balances at the timeStatements of the change.Operations.



(5)
270


(4)Jointly Owned Utility Facilities


Under joint facility ownership agreements with other utilities, MidAmerican Energy, as a tenant in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation and transmission facilities. MidAmerican Energy accounts for its proportionate share of each facility, and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Statements of Operations include MidAmerican Energy's share of the expenses of these facilities.


The amounts shown in the table below represent MidAmerican Energy's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 20172022 (dollars in millions):
AccumulatedConstruction
CompanyPlant inDepreciation andWork-in-
ShareServiceAmortizationProgress
Louisa Unit No. 188 %$976 $511 $
Quad Cities Unit Nos. 1 & 2(1)
25 730 482 11 
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 379 964 624 13 
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 4(2)
60 171 127 
George Neal Unit No. 441 321 184 
Ottumwa Unit No. 1(2)
52 569 280 19 
George Neal Unit No. 372 535 312 20 
Transmission facilitiesVarious267 101 
Total$4,533 $2,621 $82 
(1)Includes amounts related to nuclear fuel.
(2)Plant in-service and accumulated depreciation and amortization amounts are net of credits applied under Iowa regulatory arrangements totaling $733 million and $150 million, respectively.

(5)    Regulatory Matters
     Accumulated Construction
 Company Plant in Depreciation and Work-in-
 Share Service Amortization Progress
        
Louisa Unit No. 188% $807
 $432
 $8
Quad Cities Unit Nos. 1 & 2(1)
25
 698
 387
 20
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 379
 617
 316
 8
Walter Scott, Jr. Unit No. 4(2)
60
 456
 112
 1
George Neal Unit No. 441
 307
 159
 1
Ottumwa Unit No. 152
 567
 206
 40
George Neal Unit No. 372
 425
 183
 7
Transmission facilitiesVarious
 249
 87
 1
Total  $4,126
 $1,882
 $86
(1)Includes amounts related to nuclear fuel.
(2)Plant in service and accumulated depreciation and amortization amounts are net of credits applied under Iowa revenue sharing arrangements totaling $319 million and $81 million, respectively.


Regulatory Assets
(6)Regulatory Matters


Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future regulated rates. MidAmerican Energy's regulatory assets reflected on the Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Asset retirement obligations(1)
9 years$469 $393 
Employee benefit plans(2)
15 years47 42 
OtherVarious34 38 
Total$550 $473 
 Average    
 Remaining Life 2017 2016
      
Deferred income taxes, net(1)
N/A $
 $985
Asset retirement obligations(2)
10 years 133
 105
Employee benefit plans(3)
13 years 38
 40
Unrealized loss on regulated derivative contracts1 year 6
 2
OtherVarious 27
 29
Total  $204
 $1,161
(1)Amount predominantly relates to AROs for fossil-fueled and wind-powered generating facilities. Refer to Note 11 for a discussion of AROs.
(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax benefits related to state accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(2)Amount predominantly relates to asset retirement obligations for fossil-fueled and wind-powered generating facilities. Refer to Note 12 for a discussion of asset retirement obligations.
(3)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.

(2)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.

MidAmerican Energy had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $200$548 million and $1.2 billion$470 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.



271


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent income to be recognized or amounts expected to be returned to customers in future periods. MidAmerican Energy's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Cost of removal(1)
29 years$392 $394 
Iowa electric revenue sharing(2)
1 year312 115 
Asset retirement obligations(3)
31 years247 341 
Deferred income taxes(4)
Various72 83 
Pre-funded AFUDC on transmission MVPs(5)
57 years34 34 
Unrealized gain on regulated derivative contracts1 year31 26 
Employee benefit plans(6)
N/A— 55 
OtherVarious31 32 
Total$1,119 $1,080 
(1)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing utility plant in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.
(2)Represents current-year accruals under a regulatory arrangement in Iowa in which equity returns exceeding specified thresholds reduce utility plant upon final determination.
(3)Amount represents the excess of nuclear decommission trust assets over the related ARO. Refer to Note 11 for a discussion of AROs.
(4)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities primarily related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to state accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(5)Represents AFUDC accrued on transmission MVPs that is deducted from rate base as a result of the inclusion of related construction work-in-progress in rate base.
(6)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are to be returned to customers in future periods when recognized.

Natural Gas Purchased for Resale

In February 2021, severe cold weather over the central U.S. caused disruptions in natural gas supply from the southern part of the U.S. These disruptions, combined with increased demand, resulted in historically high prices for natural gas purchased for resale to MidAmerican Energy's retail customers and caused an approximate $245 million increase in natural gas costs above those normally expected. These increased costs are reflected in cost of natural gas purchased for resale and other on the Statement of Operations and their recovery through the Purchased Gas Adjustment Clause is reflected in regulated natural gas and other revenue.

To mitigate the impact to MidAmerican Energy's customers, the IUB ordered the recovery of these higher costs to be applied to customer bills over the period April 2021 through April 2022 based on a customer's monthly natural gas usage. The unbilled portion of these costs as of December 31, 2021, is reflected in trade receivables, net on the Balance Sheet.

(6)Investments and Restricted Investments
 Average    
 Remaining Life 2017 2016
      
Cost of removal accrual(1)
28 years $688
 $665
Deferred income taxes(2)
28 years 681
 
Asset retirement obligations(3)
35 years 173
 117
Employee benefit plans(4)
11 years 41
 12
Pre-funded AFUDC on transmission MVPs(5)
55 years 35
 35
Iowa electric revenue sharing accrual(6)
1 year 26
 30
Unrealized gain on regulated derivative contracts1 year 3
 6
OtherVarious 14
 18
Total  $1,661
 $883
(1)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing utility plant in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.
(2)
Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to state accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. See Note 10 for further discussion of 2017 Tax Reform impacts.
(3)Amount predominantly represents the excess of nuclear decommission trust assets over the related asset retirement obligation. Refer to Note 12 for a discussion of asset retirement obligations.
(4)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are to be returned to customers in future periods when recognized.
(5)Represents AFUDC accrued on transmission MVPs that is deducted from rate base as a result of the inclusion of related construction work-in-progress in rate base.
(6)Represents current-year accruals under a regulatory arrangement in Iowa in which equity returns exceeding specified thresholds reduce utility plant upon final determination.

(7)Investments and Restricted Cash and Investments


Investments and restricted cash and investments consists of the following amounts as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Nuclear decommissioning trust$664 $768 
Rabbi trusts215 233 
Other23 25 
Total$902 $1,026 

272

 2017 2016
    
Nuclear decommissioning trust$515
 $460
Rabbi trusts198
 184
Other15
 9
Total$728
 $653


MidAmerican Energy has established a trust for the investment of funds for decommissioning the Quad Cities Station. These investments inThe debt and equity securities are classified as available-for-sale andin the trust are reported at fair value. Funds are invested in the trust in accordance with applicable federal and state investment guidelines and are restricted for use as reimbursement for costs of decommissioning the Quad Cities Station, which is currently licensed for operation until December 2032. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the fair value of the trust's funds was invested as follows: 56%54% and 54%56%, respectively, in domestic common equity securities, 34%32% and 35%30%, respectively, in United StatesU.S. government securities, 7%11% and 8%12%, respectively, in domestic corporate debt securities and 3% and 3%2%, respectively, in other securities.


Rabbi trusts primarily hold corporate-owned life insurance on certain current and former key executives and directors. The Rabbi trusts were established to hold investments used to fund the obligations of various nonqualified executive and director compensation plans and to pay the costs of the trusts. The amount represents the cash surrender value of all of the policies included in the Rabbi trusts, net of amounts borrowed against the cash surrender value. Changes in the cash surrender value of the policies are reflected in other income and (expense) - other, net on the Statements of Operation.



(8)Short-Term
(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities


Interim financing of working capital needs and the construction program is obtained from unaffiliated parties through the sale of commercial paper or short-term borrowing from banks. The following table summarizes MidAmerican Energy's availability under its unsecured revolving credit facilities as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Credit facilities$1,505 $1,505 
Less:
Variable-rate tax-exempt bond support(370)(370)
Net credit facilities$1,135 $1,135 

As of December 31, 2022, MidAmerican Energy has a $900 million$1.5 billion unsecured credit facility expiring in June 20202025 with two one-yearan unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which supports MidAmerican Energy's commercial paper program and its variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Eurodollar rateSecured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") or a base rate, at MidAmerican Energy's option, plus a spread that varies based on MidAmerican Energy's credit ratings for senior unsecured long-term debt securities. In addition,Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has a $5 million unsecured credit facility, which expires in June 20182023 and has a variable interest rate based on LIBORSOFR, plus a spread. As of December 31, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on

MidAmerican Energy had no commercial paper borrowings outstanding was 0.73%.of as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The $900 million$1.5 billion credit facility requires that MidAmerican Energy's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of any quarter.

As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy was in compliance with the covenants of its credit facilities. MidAmerican Energy has authority from the FERC to issue commercial paper and bank notes aggregating $905 million$1.5 billion through February 28, 2019.April 2, 2024.


The following table summarizes MidAmerican Energy's availability under its two unsecured revolving credit facilities asAs of December 31, (in millions):2022 and 2021, MidAmerican Energy had $34 million and $42 million, respectively, of fully available letters of credit issued under committed arrangements outside of its credit facility in support of certain transactions required by third parties that generally have provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration dates for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew a letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

273
 2017 2016
    
Credit facilities$905
 $605
Less:   
Short-term debt outstanding
 (99)
Variable-rate tax-exempt bond support(370) (220)
Net credit facilities$535
 $286



(8)Long-term Debt

(9)Long-Term Debt


MidAmerican Energy's long-term debt consists of the following, including amounts maturing within one year and unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
First mortgage bonds:
3.70%, due 2023$250 $250 $250 
3.50%, due 2024500 500 501 
3.10%, due 2027375 374 373 
3.65%, due 2029850 859 860 
4.80%, due 2043350 347 346 
4.40%, due 2044400 395 395 
4.25%, due 2046450 446 446 
3.95%, due 2047475 471 470 
3.65%, due 2048700 689 689 
4.25%, due 2049900 875 874 
3.15%, due 2050600 592 592 
2.70%, due 2052500 492 492 
Notes:
6.75% Series, due 2031400 397 397 
5.75% Series, due 2035300 298 298 
5.80% Series, due 2036350 348 348 
Transmission upgrade obligations, 3.20% to 7.81%, due 2036 to 204248 27 22 
Variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligation series: (weighted average interest rate- 2022-3.83%, 2021-0.13%):
Due 2023, issued in 1993
Due 2023, issued in 200857 57 57 
Due 202435 35 35 
Due 202513 13 13 
Due 203633 33 33 
Due 203845 45 45 
Due 204630 30 29 
Due 2047150 149 149 
Total long-term debt$7,818 $7,729 $7,721 
Reflected as:
20222021
Current portion of long-term debt$317 $— 
Long-term debt7,412 7,721 
Total long-term debt$7,729 $7,721 

274

 Par Value 2017 2016
      
First mortgage bonds:     
2.40%, due 2019$500
 $499
 $499
3.70%, due 2023250
 248
 248
3.50%, due 2024500
 501
 501
3.10%, due 2027375
 372
 
4.80%, due 2043350
 346
 345
4.40%, due 2044400
 394
 394
4.25%, due 2046450
 445
 445
3.95%, due 2047475
 470
 
Notes:     
5.95% Series, due 2017
 
 250
5.3% Series, due 2018350
 350
 350
6.75% Series, due 2031400
 396
 396
5.75% Series, due 2035300
 298
 298
5.8% Series, due 2036350
 347
 347
Transmission upgrade obligation, 4.45% and 3.42% due through 2035 and 2036, respectively8
 6
 7
Variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligation series: (weighted average interest rate- 2017-1.91%, 2016-0.76%):     
Due 2023, issued in 19937
 7
 7
Due 2023, issued in 200857
 57
 57
Due 202435
 35
 35
Due 202513
 13
 13
Due 203633
 33
 33
Due 203845
 45
 45
Due 204630
 29
 29
Due 2047150
 149
 
Capital lease obligations - 4.16%, due through 20202
 2
 2
Total$5,080
 $5,042
 $4,301


The annual repayments of MidAmerican Energy's long-term debt for the years beginning January 1, 2018,2023, and thereafter, excluding unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, are as follows (in millions):
2023$317 
2024538 
202515 
2026
2027378 
2028 and thereafter6,567 
2018 $350
2019 501
2020 2
2021 
2022 
2023 and thereafter 4,227

In February 2018, MidAmerican Energy issued $700 million of its 3.65% First Mortgage Bonds due August 2048.



Pursuant to MidAmerican Energy's mortgage dated September 9, 2013, MidAmerican Energy's first mortgage bonds, currently and from time to time outstanding, are secured by a first mortgage lien on substantially all of its electric generating, transmission and distribution property within the Statestate of Iowa, subject to certain exceptions and permitted encumbrances. AsApproximately $24 billion of December 31, 2017, MidAmerican Energy's eligible property, based on original cost, was subject to the lien of the mortgage totaled approximately $16 billion based on original cost.as of December 31, 2022. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy's senior notes outstanding are equally and ratably secured with the first mortgage bonds as required by the indentures under which the senior notes were issued.


MidAmerican Energy's variable-rate tax-exempt bond obligations bear interest at rates that are periodically established through remarketing of the bonds in the short-term tax-exempt market. MidAmerican Energy, at its option, may change the mode of interest calculation for these bonds by selecting from among several floating or fixed rate alternatives. The interest rates shown in the table above are the weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021. MidAmerican Energy maintains revolving credit facility agreements to provide liquidity for holders of these issues. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy's obligations associated with the $30 million and $150 million variable rate, tax-exempt bond obligations due 2046 and 2047, respectively, are secured by an equal amount of first mortgage bonds pursuant to MidAmerican Energy's mortgage dated September 9, 2013, as supplemented and amended. In December 2017, the Iowa Finance Authority issued $150 million of its variable-rate, tax-exempt Solid Waste Facilities Revenue Bonds due December 2047, the proceeds of which were loaned to MidAmerican Energy and restricted for the purpose of constructing solid waste facilities. As of December 31, 2017, $108 million of the restricted proceeds are reflected in other current assets on the Balance Sheet.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy was in compliance with all of its applicable long-term debt covenants.


In March 1999, MidAmerican Energy committed to the IUB to use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain an investment grade rating on its long-term debt and to maintain its common equity level above 42% of total capitalization unless circumstances beyond its control result in the common equity level decreasing to below 39% of total capitalization. MidAmerican Energy must seek the approval from the IUB of a reasonable utility capital structure if MidAmerican Energy's common equity level decreases below 42% of total capitalization, unless the decrease is beyond the control of MidAmerican Energy. MidAmerican Energy is also required to seek the approval of the IUB if MidAmerican Energy's equity level decreases to below 39%, even if the decrease is due to circumstances beyond the control of MidAmerican Energy. As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy's common equity ratio was 53%55% computed on a basis consistent with its commitment. As a result of its regulatory commitment to maintain its common equity level above certain thresholds, MidAmerican Energy could dividend $2.1$4.2 billion as of December 31, 2017,2022, without falling below 42%.


(10)Income Taxes

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act(9)Income Taxes

The 2017 Tax Reform impacts many areas of income tax law. The most material items include the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and limitations on bonus depreciation for utility property. GAAP requires the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates be recognized in the period the tax rate change was enacted. As a result of the 2017 Tax Reform, MidAmerican Energy reduced deferred income tax liabilities $1,824 million. As it is probable the change in deferred taxes will be passed back to customers through regulatory mechanisms, MidAmerican Energy increased net regulatory liabilities by $1,845 million.

In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 to assist in the implementation process of the 2017 Tax Reform by allowing for calculations to be classified as provisional and subject to remeasurement. There are three different classifications for the accounting: (1) completed, (2) not complete but reasonably estimable or (3) not complete and amounts are not reasonably estimable. MidAmerican Energy has recorded the impacts of 2017 Tax Reform and believes all the impacts to be complete with the exception of interpretations of the bonus depreciation rules. MidAmerican Energy has determined the amounts recorded and the interpretations relating to this item to be provisional and subject to remeasurement during the measurement period upon obtaining the necessary additional information to complete the accounting. MidAmerican Energy believes its interpretations for bonus depreciation to be reasonable; however, as the guidance is clarified estimates may change. The accounting is estimated to be completed by December 2018.



MidAmerican Energy's income tax benefit from continuing operations consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current:
Federal$(769)$(736)$(684)
State(34)(92)(94)
(803)(828)(778)
Deferred:
Federal77 189 201 
State(43)(35)
34 154 209 
Investment tax credits(1)(1)(1)
Total$(770)$(675)$(570)

275

 2017 2016 2015
Current:     
Federal$(490) $(479) $(415)
State(25) (14) (6)
 (515) (493) (421)
Deferred:     
Federal335
 366
 281
State(2) (4) (6)
 333
 362
 275
      
Investment tax credits(1) (1) (1)
Total$(183) $(132) $(147)


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to MidAmerican Energy's effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax benefit from continuing operations is as follows for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Income tax credits(372)(262)(199)
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit(32)(46)(27)
Effects of ratemaking(23)(20)(17)
Other, net(1)(1)
Effective income tax rate(403)%(308)%(223)%
 2017 2016 2015
      
Federal statutory income tax rate35 % 35 % 35 %
Income tax credits(68) (61) (71)
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit(4) (3) (2)
Effects of ratemaking(7) (3) (12)
2017 Tax Reform2
 
 
Other, net(1) 
 1
Effective income tax rate(43)% (32)% (49)%


Income tax credits relate primarily to production tax credits ("PTC") earned by MidAmerican Energy's wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities. Federal renewable electricity production tax creditsPTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities is produced and sold and are based on a per-kilowatt hour rate pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law. Interim recognition of production tax credits in income is based on the annualized effective tax rate applied each period, similar to all book to tax differences. Recognition of production tax credits in income during interim periods of the year may vary significantly from actual amounts earned. Wind-poweredWind- and solar-powered generating facilities are eligible for the credits for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in service.in-service. PTCs recognized for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 totaled $710 million, $574 million and $510 million, respectively.



MidAmerican Energy's net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Deferred income tax assets:
Regulatory liabilities$194 $240 
Asset retirement obligations191 220 
Revenue sharing87 33 
State carryforwards61 55 
Employee benefits37 26 
Other24 (3)
Total deferred income tax assets594 571 
Valuation allowances(2)(1)
Total deferred income tax assets, net592 570 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Depreciable property(3,895)(3,843)
Regulatory assets(128)(112)
Other(2)(4)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(4,025)(3,959)
Net deferred income tax liability$(3,433)$(3,389)
 2017 2016
Deferred income tax assets:   
Regulatory liabilities$443
 $333
Asset retirement obligations160
 230
Employee benefits45
 66
Other57
 74
Total deferred income tax assets705
 703
    
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Depreciable property(2,865) (3,763)
Regulatory assets(42) (471)
Other(35) (41)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(2,942) (4,275)
    
Net deferred income tax liability$(2,237) $(3,572)


As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy has available $40 million ofEnergy's state tax carryforwards, principally related to $583$921 million of net operating losses, that expire at various intervals between 20182023 and 2036.2041.


The United StatesU.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of BHE'sMidAmerican Energy's income tax returns through December 31, 2009, including components related to MidAmerican Energy. In addition, state jurisdictions have closed their examinations2013. The statute of limitations for MidAmerican Energy's income tax returns have expired for Iowacertain states through December 31, 2013,2011, and for Illinoisother states through December 31, 2008, and2018, except for other jurisdictions through December 31, 2009.the impact of any federal audit adjustments. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, for state filings may not preclude the state from adjusting the state net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.


276


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of MidAmerican Energy's net unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$13 $
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year15 16 
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year(12)(11)
Ending balance$16 $13 
 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$10
 $10
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year1
 
Additions for tax positions of prior years23
 10
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year(4) (2)
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(19) (8)
Interest and penalties1
 
Ending balance$12
 $10


As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Energy had unrecognized tax benefits totaling $38$39 million that, if recognized, would have an impact on the effective tax rate. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions for which ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty as to the timing of such deductibility. Recognition of these tax benefits, other than applicable interest and penalties, would not affect MidAmerican Energy's effective income tax rate.


(11)Employee Benefit Plans

(10)Employee Benefit Plans

Defined Benefit Plan

MidAmerican Energy sponsors a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering a majority of all employees of BHE and its domestic energy subsidiaries other than PacifiCorp and NV Energy, Inc. Benefit obligations under the plan are based on a cash balance arrangement for salaried employees and most union employees and final average pay formulas for other union employees. MidAmerican Energy also maintains noncontributory, nonqualified defined benefit supplemental executive retirement plans ("SERP") for certain active and retired participants. For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the defined benefit pension plan recorded a settlement loss of $4 million and a settlement gain of $5 million, respectively, for previously unrecognized losses and gains as a result of excess lump sum distributions over the defined threshold. In 2022, the defined benefit pension plan recorded a curtailment gain of $10 million as a result of certain plan amendments.



MidAmerican Energy also sponsors certain postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits covering substantially all retired employees of BHE and its domestic energy subsidiaries other than PacifiCorp and NV Energy, Inc. Under the plans, a majority of all employees of the participating companies may become eligible for these benefits if they reach retirement age. New employees are not eligible for benefits under the plans. MidAmerican Energy has been allowed to recover accrued pension and other postretirement benefit costs in its electric and gas service rates.


Net Periodic Benefit Cost


For purposes of calculating the expected return on pension plan assets, a market-related value is used. The market-related value of plan assets is calculated by spreading the difference between expected and actual investment returns on equity investments over a five-year period beginning after the first year in which they occur.


MidAmerican Energy bills to and is reimbursed currently for affiliates' share of the net periodic benefit costs from all plans in which such affiliates participate. In 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, MidAmerican Energy's share of the pension net periodic benefit (credit) cost (credit) was $(6) million, $(2) million, $(20) million and $(4)$(13) million, respectively. MidAmerican Energy's share of the other postretirement net periodic benefit (credit) cost (credit) in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 totaled $(1)$(2) million, $(1)$1 million and $-$(5) million, respectively.


277


Net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the plans of MidAmerican Energy and the aforementioned affiliates included the following components for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Service cost$15 $20 $$$$
Interest cost23 22 25 
Expected return on plan assets(27)(37)(40)(14)(10)(14)
Curtailment(10)— — — — — 
Settlement(5)— — — — 
Net amortization(2)(4)(5)
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)$$$(6)$— $$(8)
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
            
Service cost$9
 $10
 $12
 $5
 $5
 $7
Interest cost31
 34
 32
 9
 10
 9
Expected return on plan assets(44) (44) (46) (14) (13) (15)
Net amortization2
 2
 2
 (4) (4) (3)
Net periodic benefit (credit) cost$(2) $2
 $
 $(4) $(2) $(2)


Funded Status


The following table is a reconciliation of the fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$704 $718 $308 $278 
Employer contributions10 
Participant contributions— — 
Actual return on plan assets(130)58 (58)34 
Settlement(57)(46)— — 
Benefits paid(34)(34)(14)(15)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$490 $704 $240 $308 
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Plan assets at fair value, beginning of year$684
 $678
 $252
 $249
Employer contributions7
 7
 1
 1
Participant contributions
 
 1
 1
Actual return on plan assets114
 57
 36
 14
Benefits paid(60) (58) (13) (13)
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$745
 $684
 $277
 $252



The following table is a reconciliation of the benefit obligations for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$781 $845 $285 $304 
Service cost15 20 
Interest cost23 22 
Participant contributions— — 
Actuarial (gain) loss(129)(25)(64)(18)
Amendment(3)— 19 
Curtailment(10)— — — 
Settlement(57)(46)— — 
Acquisition— (1)— (5)
Benefits paid(34)(34)(14)(15)
Benefit obligation, end of year$586 $781 $243 $285 
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$551 $721 

278


 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Benefit obligation, beginning of year$773
 $785
 $233
 $234
Service cost9
 10
 5
 5
Interest cost31
 34
 9
 10
Participant contributions
 
 1
 1
Actuarial loss (gain)46
 2
 11
 (4)
Benefits paid(60) (58) (13) (13)
Benefit obligation, end of year$799
 $773
 $246
 $233
Accumulated benefit obligation, end of year$790
 $764
    

The funded status of the plans and the amounts recognized on the Balance Sheets as of December 31 are as follows (in millions):
Pension Other PostretirementPensionOther Postretirement
2017 2016 2017 20162022202120222021
       
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$745
 $684
 $277
 $252
Plan assets at fair value, end of year$490 $704 $240 $308 
Less - Benefit obligation, end of year799
 773
 246
 233
Less - Benefit obligation, end of year586 781 243 285 
Funded status$(54) $(89) $31
 $19
Funded status$(96)$(77)$(3)$23 
       
Amounts recognized on the Balance Sheets:       Amounts recognized on the Balance Sheets:
Other assets$66
 $26
 $31
 $19
Other assets$— $34 $— $23 
Other current liabilities(8) (8) 
 
Other current liabilities(8)(7)— — 
Other liabilities(112) (107) 
 
Other long-term liabilitiesOther long-term liabilities(88)(104)(3)— 
Amounts recognized$(54) $(89) $31
 $19
Amounts recognized$(96)$(77)$(3)$23 


The SERP has no plan assets; however, MidAmerican Energy hasand BHE have Rabbi trusts that hold corporate-owned life insurance and other investments to provide funding for the future cash requirements of the SERP. The cash surrender value of all of the policies included in theMidAmerican Energy's Rabbi trusts, net of amounts borrowed against the cash surrender value, plus the fair market value of other Rabbi trust investments, was $118$134 million and $110$143 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. These assets are not included in the plan assets in the above table, but are reflected in investments and restricted cash and investments on the Balance Sheets. The accumulated benefit obligation and projected benefit obligation for the SERP was $85 million and $85 million for 2022 and $111 million and $111 million for 2021, respectively.


Unrecognized Amounts


The portion of the funded status of the plans not yet recognized in net periodic benefit cost as of December 31 is as follows (in millions):
PensionOther Postretirement
2022202120222021
Net loss (gain)$(4)$(25)$11 $
Prior service cost (credit)(3)— 19 (3)
Total$(7)$(25)$30 $(1)
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2017 2016
        
Net (gain) loss$(11) $15
 $23
 $36
Prior service cost (credit)1
 1
 (25) (31)
Total$(10) $16
 $(2) $5


MidAmerican Energy sponsors pension and other postretirement benefit plans on behalf of certain of its affiliates in addition to itself, and therefore, the portion of the funded status of the respective plans that has not yet been recognized in net periodic benefit cost is attributable to multiple entities. Additionally, substantially all of MidAmerican Energy's portion of such amounts is either refundable to or recoverable from its customers and is reflected as regulatory liabilities and regulatory assets.



279


A reconciliation of the amounts not yet recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 is as follows (in millions):
Regulatory
Asset
Regulatory
Liability
Receivables
(Payables)
with Affiliates
Total
Pension
Balance, December 31, 2020$21 $(20)$17 $18 
Net loss (gain) arising during the year(40)(9)(47)
Settlement— — 
Net amortization(1)— — (1)
Total(35)(9)(43)
Balance, December 31, 202122 (55)(25)
Net loss (gain) arising during the year(7)58 (25)26 
Net prior service cost (credit) arising during the year— — (3)(3)
Settlement— (4)— (4)
Net amortization(1)— — (1)
Total(8)54 (28)18 
Balance, December 31, 2022$14 $(1)$(20)$(7)
 
Regulatory
Asset
 
Regulatory
Liability
 
Receivables
(Payables)
with Affiliates
 Total
Pension       
Balance, December 31, 2015$22
 $
 $6
 $28
Net loss (gain) arising during the year1
 (11) 
 (10)
Net amortization(1) (1) 
 (2)
Total
 (12) 
 (12)
Balance, December 31, 201622
 (12) 6
 16
Net loss (gain) arising during the year4
 (29) 1
 (24)
Net amortization(2) 
 
 (2)
Total2
 (29) 1
 (26)
Balance, December 31, 2017$24
 $(41) $7
 $(10)



Regulatory
Asset
Receivables
(Payables)
with Affiliates
Total
Other Postretirement
Balance, December 31, 2020$45 $(9)$36 
Net loss (gain) arising during the year(29)(13)(42)
Net prior service cost (credit) arising during the year— 
Net amortization
Total(25)(12)(37)
Balance, December 31, 202120 (21)(1)
Net loss (gain) arising during the year10 (1)
Net prior service cost (credit) arising during the year— 19 19 
Net amortization— 
Total13 18 31 
Balance, December 31, 2022$33 $(3)$30 
280
 
Regulatory
Asset
 
Receivables
(Payables)
with Affiliates
 Total
Other Postretirement     
Balance, December 31, 2015$17
 $(11) $6
Net gain arising during the year(2) (3) (5)
Net amortization3
 1
 4
Total1
 (2) (1)
Balance, December 31, 201618
 (13) 5
Net gain arising during the year(7) (4) (11)
Net amortization3
 1
 4
Total(4) (3) (7)
Balance, December 31, 2017$14
 $(16) $(2)

The net loss and prior service cost (credit) that will be amortized in 2018 into net periodic benefit cost are estimated to be as follows (in millions):


 
Net
Loss
 
Prior
Service
Cost (Credit)
 Total
      
Pension$1
 $1
 $2
Other postretirement1
 (5) (4)
Total$2
 $(4) $(2)


Plan Assumptions


Assumptions used to determine benefit obligations and net periodic benefit cost were as follows:
PensionOther Postretirement
202220212020202220212020
Benefit obligations as of December 31:
Discount rate5.70 %3.05 %2.75 %5.60 %2.95 %2.65 %
Rate of compensation increase3.00 %2.75 %2.75 %N/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan
2020N/AN/A2.27 %N/AN/AN/A
2021N/A1.19 %0.99 %N/AN/AN/A
20223.74 %1.19 %0.99 %N/AN/AN/A
20233.74 %1.19 %0.99 %N/AN/AN/A
20243.74 %1.19 %0.99 %N/AN/AN/A
2025 and beyond3.74 %1.19 %0.99 %N/AN/AN/A
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:
Discount rate3.05 %2.75 %3.40 %2.95 %2.65 %3.20 %
Expected return on plan assets(1)
4.30 %5.60 %6.25 %5.30 %4.00 %6.00 %
Rate of compensation increase2.75 %2.75 %2.75 %N/AN/AN/A
Interest crediting rates for cash balance plan3.74 %1.19 %2.27 %N/AN/AN/A
 Pension Other Postretirement
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Benefit obligations as of December 31:           
Discount rate3.60% 4.10% 4.50% 3.50% 3.90% 4.25%
Rate of compensation increase2.75% 2.75% 2.75% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
            
Net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31:           
Discount rate4.10% 4.50% 4.00% 3.90% 4.25% 3.75%
Expected return on plan assets(1)
6.75% 7.00% 7.25% 6.50% 6.75% 7.00%
Rate of compensation increase2.75% 2.75% 2.75% N/A
 N/A
 N/A
(1)Amounts reflected are pretax values. Assumed after-tax returns for a taxable, non-union other postretirement plan were 4.21% for 2022, 2.39% for 2021 and 4.62% for 2020.
(1)Amounts reflected are pre-tax values. Assumed after-tax returns for a taxable, non-union other postretirement plan were 4.81% for 2017, and 5.00% for 2016, and 5.18% for 2015.


In establishing its assumption as to the expected return on plan assets, MidAmerican Energy utilizes the asset allocation and return assumptions for each asset class based on historical performance and forward-looking views of the financial markets.
20222021
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates as of December 31:
Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year6.50 %5.90 %
Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to5.00 %5.00 %
Year that the rate reaches the rate it is assumed to remain at20282025
 2017 2016
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates as of December 31:   
Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year7.10% 7.40%
Rate that the cost trend rate gradually declines to5.00% 5.00%
Year that the rate reaches the rate it is assumed to remain at2025 2025


A one percentage-point change in assumed healthcare cost trend rates would have the following effects (in millions):
281

 One Percentage-Point
 Increase Decrease
Increase (decrease) in: 
Total service and interest cost for the year ended December 31, 2017$
 $
Other postretirement benefit obligation as of December 31, 20173
 (3)


Contributions and Benefit Payments


Employer contributions to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are expected to be $8$7 million and $1$2 million, respectively, during 2018.2022. Funding to MidAmerican Energy's qualified pension benefit plan trust is based upon the actuarially determined costs of the plan and the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Pension Protection Act of 2006, as amended. MidAmerican Energy considers contributing additional amounts from time to time in order to achieve certain funding levels specified under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, as amended. MidAmerican Energy's funding policy forEnergy evaluates a variety of factors, including funded status, income tax laws and regulatory requirements, in determining contributions to its other postretirement benefit plan is to generally contribute amounts consistent with its rate regulatory arrangements.plans.



Net periodic benefit costs assigned to MidAmerican Energy affiliates are reimbursed currently in accordance with its intercompany administrative services agreement. The expected benefit payments to participants in MidAmerican Energy's pension and other postretirement benefit plans for 20172023 through 20212027 and for the five years thereafter are summarized below (in millions):
Projected Benefit Payments
PensionOther Postretirement
2023$59 $21 
202454 22 
202553 23 
202653 23 
202751 23 
2028-2032231 105 
 Projected Benefit Payments
 Pension Other Postretirement
    
2018$60
 $19
201961
 20
202060
 21
202159
 22
202257
 21
2023-2027256
 98


Plan Assets


Investment Policy and Asset Allocations


MidAmerican Energy's investment policy for its pension and other postretirement benefit plans is to balance risk and return through a diversified portfolio of debt securities, equity securities and other alternative investments. Maturities for debt securities are managed to targets consistent with prudent risk tolerances. The plans retain outside investment advisorsconsultants to manageadvise on plan investments within the parameters outlined by the MidAmericanBerkshire Hathaway Energy Pension and Employee Benefits Plans AdministrativeCompany Investment Committee. The investment portfolio is managed in line with the investment policy with sufficient liquidity to meet near-term benefit payments.


The target allocations (percentage of plan assets) for MidAmerican Energy's pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets are as follows as of December 31, 2017:
2022:
Pension
Other
Postretirement
%%
Debt securities(1)
40-7020-40
Equity securities(1)
35-6060-80
OtherPension0-15
Other
Postretirement
%%
Debt securities(1)
20-5025-45
Equity securities(1)
60-8045-80
Real estate funds2-8
Other0-30-5

(1)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds are allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.

(1)For purposes of target allocation percentages and consistent with the plans' investment policy, investment funds are allocated based on the underlying investments in debt and equity securities.

282


Fair Value Measurements


The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for MidAmerican Energy's defined benefit pension plan (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash equivalents$— $15 $— $15 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations22 — — 22 
Corporate obligations— 135 — 135 
Municipal obligations— 10 — 10 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 13 — 13 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies71 — — 71 
International companies— — 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$94 $173 $— 267 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
223 
Total assets measured at fair value$490 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash equivalents$— $27 $— $27 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations33 — — 33 
Corporate obligations— 242 — 242 
Municipal obligations— 18 — 18 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— 17 — 17 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies35 — — 35 
Total assets in the fair value hierarchy$68 $304 $— 372 
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
332 
Total assets measured at fair value$704 
(1)Refer to Note 12 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 55% and 45%, respectively, for 2022 and 56% and 44%, respectively, for 2021. Additionally, these funds are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 97% and 3%, respectively, for 2022 and 90% and 10%, respectively, for 2021.
283

 
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
As of December 31, 2017:       
Cash equivalents$
 $17
 $
 $17
Debt securities:       
United States government obligations21
 
 
 21
Corporate obligations
 59
 
 59
Municipal obligations
 7
 
 7
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 33
 
 33
Equity securities:       
United States companies137
 
 
 137
International equity securities44
 
 
 44
Investment funds(2)
74
 
 
 74
Total assets in the hierarchy$276
 $116
 $
 392
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
      315
Real estate funds measured at net asset value      38
Total assets measured at fair value      $745
        
As of December 31, 2016:       
Cash equivalents$
 $17
 $
 $17
Debt securities:       
United States government obligations9
 
 
 9
Corporate obligations
 53
 
 53
Municipal obligations
 6
 
 6
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 22
 
 22
Equity securities:       
United States companies130
 
 
 130
International equity securities39
 
 
 39
Investment funds(2)
63
 
 
 63
Total assets in the hierarchy$241
 $98
 $
 339
Investment funds(2) measured at net asset value
      295
Real estate funds measured at net asset value      50
Total assets measured at fair value      $684

(1)
Refer to Note 14 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 69% and 31%, respectively, for 2017 and 74% and 26%, respectively, for 2016. Additionally, these funds are invested in United States and international securities of approximately 72% and 28%, respectively, for 2017 and 71% and 29%, respectively, for 2016.

The following table presents the fair value of plan assets, by major category, for MidAmerican Energy's defined benefit other postretirement plans (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Cash equivalents$10 $— $— $10 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations— — 
Corporate obligations— — 
Municipal obligations— 22 — 22 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— — 
Equity securities:
Investment funds(2)
201 — — 201 
Total assets measured at fair value$213 $27 $— $240 
As of December 31, 2021:
Cash equivalents$$— $— $
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations— — 
Corporate obligations— — 
Municipal obligations— 28 — 28 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— — 
Equity securities:
Investment funds(2)
260 — — 260 
Total assets measured at fair value$271 $37 $— $308 
 
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements(1)
  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
As of December 31, 2017:       
Cash equivalents$6
 $
 $
 $6
Debt securities:       
United States government obligations5
 
 
 5
Corporate obligations
 14
 
 14
Municipal obligations
 44
 
 44
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 12
 
 12
Equity securities:       
United States companies84
 
 
 84
Investment funds(2)
112
 
 
 112
Total assets measured at fair value$207
 $70
 $
 $277
        
As of December 31, 2016:       
Cash equivalents$10
 $
 $
 $10
Debt securities:       
United States government obligations5
 
 
 5
Corporate obligations
 11
 
 11
Municipal obligations
 37
 
 37
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations
 11
 
 11
Equity securities:       
United States companies122
 
 
 122
Investment funds(2)
56
 
 
 56
Total assets measured at fair value$193
 $59
 $
 $252
(1)Refer to Note 12 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(1)
Refer to Note 14 for additional discussion regarding the three levels of the fair value hierarchy.
(2)
Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 81% and 19%, respectively, for 2017 and 70% and 30%, respectively, for 2016. Additionally, these funds are invested in United States and international securities of approximately 42% and 58%, respectively, for 2017 and 30% and 70%, respectively, for 2016.

(2)Investment funds are comprised of mutual funds and collective trust funds. These funds consist of equity and debt securities of approximately 82% and 18%, respectively, for 2022 and 2021. Additionally, these funds are invested in U.S. and international securities of approximately 82% and 18%, respectively, for 2022 and for 2021.

For level 1 investments, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value. For level 2 investments, the fair value is determined using pricing models based on observable market inputs. Shares of mutual funds not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, private equity limited partnership interests, common and commingled trust funds and investment entities are reported at fair value based on the net asset value per unit, which is used for expedience purposes. A fund's net asset value is based on the fair value of the underlying assets held by the fund less its liabilities.


Defined Contribution Plan

MidAmerican Energy sponsors a defined contribution plan ("401(k) plan") covering substantially all employees. MidAmerican Energy's matching contributions are based on each participant's level of contribution, and certain participants receive contributions based on eligible pre-taxpretax annual compensation. Contributions cannot exceed the maximum allowable for tax purposes. Certain participants now receive enhanced benefits in the 401(k) plan and no longer accrue benefits in the noncontributory defined benefit pension plans. MidAmerican Energy's contributions to the plan were $20$33 million, $20$27 million, and $20$26 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.



284
(12)Asset Retirement Obligations



(11)Asset Retirement Obligations

MidAmerican Energy estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.


MidAmerican Energy does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $688$392 million and $665$394 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.


The following table presents MidAmerican Energy's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Quad Cities Station$417 $427 
Fossil-fueled generating facilities76 161 
Wind-powered generating facilities210 197 
Solar-powered generating facilities and other
Total asset retirement obligations$707 $787 
Quad Cities Station nuclear decommissioning trust funds(1)
$664 $768 
 2017 2016
    
Quad Cities Station$342
 $343
Fossil-fueled generating facilities113
 132
Wind-powered generating facilities103
 91
Other1
 1
Total asset retirement obligations$559
 $567
    
Quad Cities Station nuclear decommissioning trust funds(1)
$515
 $460
(1)Refer to Note 6 for a discussion of the Quad Cities Station nuclear decommissioning trust funds.
(1)Refer to Note 7 for a discussion of the Quad Cities Station nuclear decommissioning trust funds.


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of MidAmerican Energy's ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$787 $818 
Change in estimated costs(27)35 
Additions
Retirements(85)(103)
Accretion30 31 
Ending balance$707 $787 
Reflected as:
Other current liabilities$24 $73 
Asset retirement obligations683 714 
$707 $787 
 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$567
 $532
Change in estimated costs(14) 28
Additions8
 14
Retirements(26) (32)
Accretion24
 25
Ending balance$559
 $567
    
Reflected as:   
Other current liabilities$31
 $57
Asset retirement obligations528
 510
 $559
 $567


The changesRetirements in estimated costs for 20172022 and 2016 were primarily due2021 relate to new decommissioning studies conducted by the operator of Quad Cities Station that changed the estimated amount and timing of cash flows.


(13)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

MidAmerican Energy is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. MidAmerican Energy is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas, coal and fuel oil commodity price risk as it has an obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Prior to January 1, 2016, MidAmerican Energy also provided nonregulated retail electricity and natural gas services in competitive markets, which created contractual obligations to provide electric and natural gas services. MidAmerican Energy's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold, and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather; market liquidity; generating facility availability; customer usage; storage; and transmission and transportation constraints. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. MidAmerican Energy does not engage in a material amount of proprietary trading activities.

MidAmerican Energy has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, monitor, report, manage and mitigate each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, MidAmerican Energy uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. MidAmerican Energy manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate its exposure to interest rate risk. MidAmerican Energy does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in MidAmerican Energy's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 14 for additional information on derivative contracts and to Note 3 for a discussion of discontinued operations.

The following table, which reflects master netting arrangements and excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases or normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair valuesettlements of MidAmerican Energy's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts to the amounts presented on a net basis on the Balance Sheets (in millions):coal combustion residuals ARO liabilities.

285
 Other   Other Other  
 Current Other Current Long-term  
 Assets Assets Liabilities Liabilities Total
As of December 31, 2017:         
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
         
Commodity assets$6
 $
 $1
 $
 $7
Commodity liabilities(1) 
 (7) (2) (10)
Total derivatives5
 
 (6) (2) (3)
Cash collateral receivable
 
 
 
 
Total derivatives - net basis$5
 $
 $(6) $(2) $(3)
          
As of December 31, 2016:         
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
         
Commodity assets$8
 $2
 $
 $
 $10
Commodity liabilities(2) 
 (3) (1) (6)
Total derivatives6
 2
 (3) (1) 4
Cash collateral receivable
 
 1
 
 1
Total derivatives - net basis$6
 $2
 $(2) $(1) $5
(1)
MidAmerican Energy's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2017, a net regulatory asset of $3 million was recorded related to the net derivative a liability of $3 million, and as of December 31, 2016, a net regulatory liability of $(4) million was recorded related to the net derivative asset of $4 million.



Not Designated as Hedging Contracts

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of MidAmerican Energy's net regulatory assets (liabilities) and summarizes the pre-tax gains and losses on commodity derivative contracts recognized in net regulatory assets (liabilities), as well as amounts reclassified to earnings for the years ended December 31 (in millions):


 2017 2016 2015
      
Beginning balance$(4) $20
 $38
Changes in fair value recognized in net regulatory assets (liabilities)16
 3
 40
Net gains (losses) reclassified to operating revenue1
 (15) (42)
Net losses reclassified to cost of fuel, energy and capacity(4) 
 (1)
Net losses reclassified to cost of gas sold(6) (12) (15)
Ending balance$3
 $(4) $20
(12)Fair Value Measurements

The following table summarizes the pre-tax unrealized gains (losses) included on the Statements of Operations associated with MidAmerican Energy's derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts and not recorded as a net regulatory asset or liability for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
      
Nonregulated operating revenue$
 $
 $15
Regulated cost of fuel, energy and capacity
 
 2
Nonregulated cost of sales
 
 (21)
Total$
 $
 $(4)

Designated as Hedging Contracts

MidAmerican Energy used derivative contracts accounted for as cash flow hedges to hedge electricity and natural gas commodity prices related to its unregulated retail services business, which was transferred to a subsidiary of BHE. The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of MidAmerican Energy's accumulated other comprehensive loss (pre-tax) and summarizes pre-tax gains and losses on derivative contracts designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges recognized in OCI, as well as amounts reclassified to earnings, for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
      
Beginning balance$
 $45
 $34
Transfer to affiliate
 (45) 
Changes in fair value recognized in OCI
 
 58
Net losses reclassified to nonregulated cost of sales
 
 (47)
Ending balance$
 $
 $45

Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
 Unit of    
 Measure 2017 2016
      
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms 21
 18


Credit Risk

MidAmerican Energy is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy participates in the regional transmission organization ("RTO") markets and has indirect credit exposure related to other participants, although RTO credit policies are designed to limit exposure to credit losses from individual participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent MidAmerican Energy's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, MidAmerican Energy analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty, and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, MidAmerican Energy enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, MidAmerican Energy exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale derivative contracts contain credit support provisions that in part base MidAmerican Energy's collateral requirements on its credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These derivative contracts may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in MidAmerican Energy's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2017, MidAmerican Energy's credit ratings from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

The aggregate fair value of MidAmerican Energy's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $8 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for which MidAmerican Energy had posted collateral of $- million at each date. If all credit-risk-related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, MidAmerican Energy would have been required to post $- million and $2 million, respectively, of additional collateral. MidAmerican Energy's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors. MidAmerican Energy's exposure to contingent features declined significantly as a result of the transfer of its unregulated retail services business to a subsidiary of BHE.

(14)Fair Value Measurements


The carrying value of MidAmerican Energy's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. MidAmerican Energy has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Financial Statements using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:


Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that MidAmerican Energy has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect MidAmerican Energy's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. MidAmerican Energy develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

286


The following table presents MidAmerican Energy's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3
Other(1)
Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$$37 $$(10)$34 
Money market mutual funds225 — — — 225 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations215 — — — 215 
International government obligations— — — 
Corporate obligations— 70 — — 70 
Municipal obligations— — — 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— — — 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies360 — — — 360 
International companies— — — 
Investment funds16 — — — 16 
$825 $112 $$(10)$933 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $(12)$(1)$10 $(3)
As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $32 $$(7)$28 
Money market mutual funds228 — — — 228 
Debt securities:
U.S. government obligations232 — — — 232 
International government obligations— — — 
Corporate obligations— 90 — — 90 
Municipal obligations— — — 
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations— — — 
Equity securities:
U.S. companies428 — — — 428 
International companies10 — — — 10 
Investment funds18 — — — 18 
$916 $129 $$(7)$1,041 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $(6)$(8)$12 $(2)
  Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements    
  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
Other(1)
 Total
As of December 31, 2017:          
Assets:          
Commodity derivatives $
 $3
 $4
 $(2) $5
Money market mutual funds(2)
 133
 
 
 
 133
Debt securities:          
United States government obligations 176
 
 
 
 176
International government obligations 
 5
 
 
 5
Corporate obligations 
 36
 
 
 36
Municipal obligations 
 2
 
 
 2
Equity securities:          
United States companies 288
 
 
 
 288
International companies 7
 
 
 
 7
Investment funds 15
 
 
 
 15
  $619
 $46
 $4
 $(2) $667
           
Liabilities - commodity derivatives $
 $(9) $(1) $2
 $(8)
           
As of December 31, 2016          
Assets:          
Commodity derivatives $
 $9
 $1
 $(2) $8
Money market mutual funds(2)
 1
 
 
 
 1
Debt securities:          
United States government obligations 161
 
 
 
 161
International government obligations 
 3
 
 
 3
Corporate obligations 
 36
 
 
 36
Municipal obligations 
 2
 
 
 2
Agency, asset and mortgage-backed obligations 
 2
 
 
 2
Equity securities:          
United States companies 250
 
 
 
 250
International companies 5
 
 
 
 5
Investment funds 9
 
 
 
 9
  $426
 $52
 $1
 $(2) $477
           
Liabilities - commodity derivatives $
 $(3) $(3) $3
 $(3)
(1)Represents netting under master netting arrangements and a net cash collateral receivable of $— million and $5 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

(1)Represents netting under master netting arrangements and a net cash collateral receivable of $- million and $1 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
(2)Amounts are included in cash and cash equivalents and investments and restricted cash and investments on the Balance Sheets. The fair value of these money market mutual funds approximates cost.


Derivative contracts are recorded on the Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which MidAmerican Energy transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, MidAmerican Energy uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent MidAmerican Energy's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. MidAmerican Energy bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations, when available, or internally developed and commercial models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations are obtained from independent energy brokers, exchanges, direct communication with market participants and actual transactions executed by MidAmerican Energy. Market price quotations are generally readily obtainable for the applicable term of MidAmerican Energy's outstanding derivative contracts; therefore, MidAmerican Energy's forward price curves reflect observable market quotes. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to the length of the contract. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, as well as for those contracts that are not actively traded, MidAmerican Energy uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contracts is a function of underlying forward commodity prices, interest rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of contracts. Refer to Note 13 for further discussion regarding MidAmerican Energy's risk management and hedging activities.


MidAmerican Energy's investments in money market mutual funds and debt and equity securities are stated at fair value, and are primarilywith debt securities accounted for as available-for-sale securities. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value. In the absence of a quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security, the fair value is determined using pricing models or net asset values based on observable market inputs and quoted market prices of securities with similar characteristics.


287


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of MidAmerican Energy's commodity derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

  Commodity Derivatives Auction Rate Securities
  2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
             
Beginning balance $(2) $(6) $12
 $
 $26
 $26
Transfer to affiliate 
 (4) 
 
 
 
Changes included in earnings(1)
 
 
 11
 
 5
 
Changes in fair value recognized in OCI 
 
 (7) 
 4
 
Changes in fair value recognized in net regulatory assets 2
 (6) (25) 
 
 
Purchases 
 
 1
 
 
 
Redemptions 
 
 
 
 (35) 
Settlements 3
 14
 2
 
 
 
Ending balance $3
 $(2) $(6) $
 $
 $26
202220212020
Beginning balance$(5)$$
Changes in fair value recognized in net regulatory assets37 (2)
Settlements(27)(5)(1)
Ending balance$$(5)$
(1)Changes included in earnings related to MidAmerican Energy's unregulated retail services business that was transferred to an affiliate of BHE. Refer to Note 3 for a discussion of discontinued operations. Net unrealized gains included in earnings for the year ended December 31, 2015, related to commodity derivatives held at December 31, 2015, totaled $8 million.
MidAmerican Energy's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Financial Statements. The fair value of MidAmerican Energy's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The carrying value of MidAmerican Energy's variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value because of the frequent repricing of these instruments at market rates. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of MidAmerican Energy's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
Long-term debt$7,729 $6,964 $7,721 $9,037 

(13)Commitments and Contingencies    
 2017 2016
 
Carrying
Value
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Value
 Fair Value
        
Long-term debt$5,042
 $5,686
 $4,301
 $4,735


(15)Commitments and Contingencies    


Commitments


MidAmerican Energy had the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as of December 31, 2017,2022, are as follows (in millions):
2028 and
20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Coal and natural gas for generation$139 $81 $60 $29 $30 $— $339 
Electric capacity and transmission33 32 33 33 17 155 
Natural gas contracts for gas operations172 78 70 60 47 33 460 
Construction commitments699 60 24 — — 787 
Easements42 43 44 44 45 1,536 1,754 
Maintenance, services and other165 129 98 102 99 163 756 
$1,250 $423 $329 $272 $238 $1,739 $4,251 
            2023 and  
  2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total
Contract type:              
Coal and natural gas for generation $112
 $56
 $12
 $9
 $8
 $
 $197
Electric capacity and transmission 34
 31
 31
 27
 16
 43
 182
Natural gas contracts for gas operations 122
 75
 73
 57
 42
 42
 411
Construction commitments 790
 28
 2
 
 
 
 820
Easements and operating leases 22
 21
 21
 21
 21
 713
 819
Maintenance and services contracts 96
 102
 119
 114
 154
 233
 818
  $1,176
 $313
 $258
 $228
 $241
 $1,031
 $3,247


Coal, Natural Gas, Electric Capacity and Transmission Commitments


MidAmerican Energy has coal supply and related transportation and lime contracts for its coal-fueled generating facilities. MidAmerican Energy expects to supplement the coal contracts with additional contracts and spot market purchases to fulfill its future coal supply needs. Additionally, MidAmerican Energy has a natural gas transportation contract for a natural gas-fueled generating facility. The contracts have minimum payment commitments ranging through 2022.2027.


MidAmerican Energy has various natural gas supply and transportation contracts for its regulated and nonregulatednatural gas operations that have minimum payment commitments ranging through 2037.


MidAmerican Energy has contracts to purchase electric capacity that have minimum payment commitments ranging through 2028. MidAmerican Energy also has contracts for the right to transmit electricity over other entities' transmission lines with minimum payment commitments ranging through 2022.2027.


288


Construction Commitments


MidAmerican Energy's firm construction commitments reflected in the table above consist primarily of contracts for the repowering and construction of wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities in 2018,and the settlement of asset retirement obligations for ash pond closures and the construction in 2018 of the last of four Multi-Value Projects approved by the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc. for high voltage transmission lines in Iowa and Illinois.AROs.


Easements and Operating Leases


MidAmerican Energy has non-cancelable easements with minimum payment commitments ranging through 2061 for land in Iowa on which certain of its assets, primarily wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities, are located. MidAmerican Energy also has non-cancelable operating leases with minimum payment commitments ranging through 2020 primarily for office and other building space, rail cars and computer equipment. These leases generally require MidAmerican Energy to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Rent expense on non-cancelable operating leases totaled $3 million, $4 million and $4 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.


Maintenance, Services and ServicesOther Contracts


MidAmerican Energy has other non-cancelable contracts primarily related to maintenance and services contracts related tofor various generating facilities with minimum payment commitments ranging through 2027.2030.



Environmental Laws and Regulations


MidAmerican Energy is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. MidAmerican Energy believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.


Legal Matters

MidAmerican Energy is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. MidAmerican Energy does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its financial results.

Transmission Rates


MidAmerican Energy's wholesale transmission rates are set annually using FERC-approved formula rates subject to true-up for actual cost of service. Prior to September 2016, the rates in effect were based on a 12.38% return on equity ("ROE"). In November 2013 and February 2015, a coalition of intervenors filed successive complaints with the FERC requesting that the 12.38% ROEbase return on equity ("ROE") used to determine rates in effect prior to September 2016 no longer be found just and reasonable and sought to reduce the base ROEROE. In August 2022, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an opinion vacating all orders related to 9.15%the complaints and 8.67%, respectively.remanding them back to the FERC. MidAmerican Energy is authorized bycannot predict the FERC to include a 0.50% adder beyondultimate outcome of these matters or the base ROE effective January 2015. In September 2016, the FERC issued an orderamount of refunds, if any, and accordingly, has reversed its previously accrued liability for the first complaint, which reduces the base ROE to 10.32% and requires refunds, plus interest, for the period from November 2013 through February 2015. It is uncertain when the FERC will rule on the second complaint, covering the period from February 2015 through May 2016. MidAmerican Energy believes it is probable that the FERC will order a base ROE lower than 12.38% in the second complaint and, as of December 31, 2017, has accrued a $9 million liability forpotential refunds of amounts collected under the higher ROE during the periods covered by the complaints.

289


(14)    Revenue from November 2013 through May 2016.Contracts with Customers

Legal Matters


MidAmerican Energy is partyuses a single five-step model to a varietyidentify and recognize Customer Revenue upon transfer of legal actions arising outcontrol of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitiveconsideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or exemplary damages. MidAmerican Energy does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its financial results.

(16)Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

services. The following table shows the changesummarizes MidAmerican Energy's revenue by line of business and customer class, including a reconciliation to MidAmerican Energy's reportable segment information included in accumulated other comprehensive loss by each component of other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes, for the year ended December 31, 2016Note 19, (in millions):
For the Year Ended December 31, 2022
ElectricNatural GasOtherTotal
Customer Revenue:
Retail:
Residential$765 $555 $— $1,320 
Commercial354 216 — 570 
Industrial1,047 38 — 1,085 
Natural gas transportation services— 44 — 44 
Other retail154 — 156 
Total retail2,320 855 — 3,175 
Wholesale495 173 — 668 
Multi-value transmission projects61 — — 61 
Other Customer Revenue— — 
Total Customer Revenue2,876 1,028 3,911 
Other revenue112 — 114 
Total operating revenue$2,988 $1,030 $$4,025 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2021
ElectricNatural GasOtherTotal
Customer Revenue:
Retail:
Residential$718 $564 $— $1,282 
Commercial327 223 — 550 
Industrial934 30 — 964 
Natural gas transportation services— 39 — 39 
Other retail149 — 152 
Total retail2,128 859 — 2,987 
Wholesale312 142 — 454 
Multi-value transmission projects58 — — 58 
Other Customer Revenue— — 15 15 
Total Customer Revenue2,498 1,001 15 3,514 
Other revenue31 — 33 
Total operating revenue$2,529 $1,003 $15 $3,547 
290


  Unrealized Unrealized Accumulated
  Losses on Losses Other
  Available-For-Sale on Cash Flow Comprehensive
  Securities Hedges Loss, Net
       
Balance, December 31, 2015 $(3) $(27) $(30)
Other comprehensive income 3
 
 3
Dividend (Note 3) 
 27
 27
Balance, December 31, 2016 $
 $
 $
For the Year Ended December 31, 2020
ElectricNatural GasOtherTotal
Customer Revenue:
Retail:
Residential$685 $342 $— $1,027 
Commercial304 111 — 415 
Industrial804 14 — 818 
Natural gas transportation services— 36 — 36 
Other retail131 — 133 
Total retail1,924 505 — 2,429 
Wholesale133 66 — 199 
Multi-value transmission projects60 — — 60 
Other Customer Revenue— — 
Total Customer Revenue2,117 571 2,696 
Other revenue22 — 24 
Total operating revenue$2,139 $573 $$2,720 


For information regarding
(15)Shareholder's Equity

In 2022, MidAmerican Energy paid $275 million in cash flow hedge reclassifications from AOCIdividends to net incomeits parent company, MHC. In January 2023, MidAmerican Energy paid $100 million in their entirety for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, refercash dividends to Note 13.its parent company, MHC.


(17)(16)Other Income and (Expense) - Other, Net


Other, net, as shown on the Statements of Operations, includes the following other income (expense) items for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Non-service cost components of postretirement employee benefit plans$$26 $24 
Corporate-owned life insurance (loss) income(16)21 16 
Gains on disposition of assets— — 
Interest income and other, net
Total$— $53 $52 

 2017 2016 2015
      
Corporate-owned life insurance income$13
 $8
 $4
Gain on redemption of auction rate securities
 5
 
Interest income and other, net6
 1
 1
Total$19
 $14
 $5


(18)(17)Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures


The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ending December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$292 $279 $286 
Income taxes received, net$840 $746 $709 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$168 $257 $227 

291
 2017 2016 2015
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$193
 $181
 $154
Income taxes received, net$465
 $601
 $629
      
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing transactions:     
Accounts payable related to utility plant additions$224
 $131
 $249
Dividend of unregulated retail services business (Note 3)$
 $90
 $



(18)Related Party Transactions
(19)Related Party Transactions


The companies identified as affiliates of MidAmerican Energy are Berkshire Hathaway and its subsidiaries, including BHE and its subsidiaries. The basis for the following transactions is provided for in service agreements between MidAmerican Energy and the affiliates.


MidAmerican Energy is reimbursed for charges incurred on behalf of its affiliates. The majority of these reimbursed expenses are for general costs, such as insurance and building rent, and for employee wages, benefits and costs related to corporate functions such as information technology, human resources, treasury, legal and accounting. The amount of such reimbursements was $53$78 million, $41$66 million and $46$47 million for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


MidAmerican Energy reimbursed BHE in the amount of $9$79 million, $6$72 million and $7$15 million in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, for its share of corporate expenses.expenses and other costs. Amounts charged to MidAmerican Energy in 2022 and 2021 were primarily reflected in construction work-in-progress on the Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.


MidAmerican Energy purchases, in the normal course of business at either tariffed or market prices, natural gas transportation and storage capacity services from Northern Natural Gas Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, and coal transportation services from BNSF Railway Company, a wholly-ownedan indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, in the normal course of business at either tariffed or market prices.Hathaway. These purchases totaled $122$141 million, $135$132 million and $165$129 million in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Additionally, in 2020, MidAmerican Energy paid $7 million to BHE Renewables, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, for the purchase of wind turbine components.


MidAmerican Energy had accounts receivable from affiliates of $9 million and $5$10 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, that are included in receivablesother current assets on the Balance Sheets. MidAmerican Energy also had accounts payable to affiliates of $16$22 million and $13$17 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, that are included in accounts payable on the Balance Sheets.


MidAmerican Energy is party to a tax-sharing agreement and is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated United StatesU.S. federal income tax return. For current federal and state income taxes, MidAmerican Energy had a receivable from BHE of $51$42 million and $79 million as of December 31, 2017,2022 and a payable to BHE of $6 million as of December 31, 2016.2021, respectively. MidAmerican Energy received net cash receiptspayments for federal and state income taxes from BHE totaling $465$840 million, $601$746 million and $629$709 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


MidAmerican Energy recognizes the full amount of the funded status for its pension and postretirement plans, and amounts attributable to MidAmerican Energy's affiliates that have not previously been recognized through income are recognized as an intercompany balance with such affiliates. MidAmerican Energy adjusts these balances when changes to the funded status of the respective plans are recognized and does not intend to settle the balances currently. Amounts receivable from affiliates attributable to the funded status of employee benefit plans totaled $16$79 million and $12$124 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, and similarare included in other assets on the Balance Sheets. Similar amounts payable to affiliates totaled $45$40 million and $36$63 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively.2021, respectively, and are included in other long-term liabilities on the Balance Sheets. See Note 1110 for further information pertaining to pension and postretirement accounting.



(20)
(19)Segment Information


MidAmerican Energy has identified two reportable operating segments: regulated electric and regulated natural gas. The previously reported nonregulated energy segment consisted substantially of MidAmerican Energy's unregulated retail services business, which was transferred to a subsidiary of BHE and is excluded from the information below related to the statements of operations for all periods presented. The regulated electric segment derives most of its revenue from regulated retail sales of electricity to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and from wholesale sales. The regulated natural gas segment derives most of its revenue from regulated retail sales of natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and also obtains revenue by transporting natural gas owned by others through its distribution system. Pricing for regulated electric and regulated natural gas sales are established separately by regulatory agencies; therefore, management also reviews each segment separately to make decisions regarding allocation of resources and in evaluating performance. Common operating costs, interest income, interest expense and income tax expense are allocated to each segment based on certain factors, which primarily relate to the nature of the cost. Refer to Note 109 for a discussion of items affecting income tax (benefit) expense for the regulated electric and natural gas operating segments.



292


The following tables provide information on a reportable segment basis (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$2,988 $2,529 $2,139 
Regulated natural gas1,030 1,003 573 
Other15 
Total operating revenue$4,025 $3,547 $2,720 
Depreciation and amortization:
Regulated electric$1,112 $861 $667 
Regulated natural gas56 53 49 
Total depreciation and amortization$1,168 $914 $716 
Operating income:
Regulated electric$372 $358 $384 
Regulated natural gas66 58 64 
Total operating income$438 $416 $448 
Interest expense:
Regulated electric$290 $279 $281 
Regulated natural gas23 23 23 
Total interest expense$313 $302 $304 
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Income tax (benefit) expense:
Regulated electric$(779)$(677)$(584)
Regulated natural gas14 
Other— (1)— 
Total income tax (benefit) expense$(770)$(675)$(570)
Net income:
Regulated electric$931 $844 $780 
Regulated natural gas30 50 45 
Other— — 
Net income$961 $894 $826 
Capital expenditures:
Regulated electric$1,742 $1,806 $1,704 
Regulated natural gas127 106 132 
Total capital expenditures$1,869 $1,912 $1,836 
As of December 31,
202220212020
Total assets:
Regulated electric$22,092 $21,385 $19,892 
Regulated natural gas1,885 1,871 1,544 
Other
Total assets$23,978 $23,257 $21,437 
293
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:     
Regulated electric$2,108
 $1,985
 $1,837
Regulated gas719
 637
 661
Other10
 3
 4
Total operating revenue$2,837
 $2,625
 $2,502
      
Depreciation and amortization:     
Regulated electric$458
 $436
 $366
Regulated gas42
 43
 41
Total depreciation and amortization$500
 $479
 $407
      
Operating income:     
Regulated electric$485
 $497
 $385
Regulated gas77
 68
 64
Other(1) 
 
Total operating income$561
 $565
 $449
      
Interest expense:     
Regulated electric$196
 $178
 $166
Regulated gas18
 18
 17
Total interest expense$214
 $196
 $183
      
Income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations:     
Regulated electric$(212) $(156) $(163)
Regulated gas29
 22
 16
Other
 2
 
Total income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations$(183) $(132) $(147)
      
Net income:     
Regulated electric$570
 $512
 $413
Regulated gas35
 32
 33
Other
 (2) 
Income from continuing operations605
 542
 446
Income on discontinued operations
 
 16
Net income$605
 $542
 $462



 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Utility construction expenditures:     
Regulated electric$1,686
 $1,564
 $1,365
Regulated gas87
 72
 81
Total utility construction expenditures$1,773
 $1,636
 $1,446
      
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Total assets:     
Regulated electric$14,914
 $14,113
 $12,970
Regulated gas1,403
 1,345
 1,251
Other1
 1
 164
Total assets$16,318
 $15,459
 $14,385


(21)Unaudited Quarterly Operating Results

 2017
 
1st Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
4th Quarter
 (In millions)
Operating revenue$695
 $658
 $813
 $671
Operating income107
 135
 288
 31
Net income (loss)105
 134
 385
 (19)
        
 2016
 
1st Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
4th Quarter
 (In millions)
Operating revenue$625
 $584
 $795
 $621
Operating income100
 139
 284
 42
Net income76
 131
 320
 15

Quarterly operating results are affected by, among other things, MidAmerican Energy's seasonal retail electricity prices, the timing of recognition of federal renewable electricity production tax credits related to MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities and the seasonal impact of weather on electricity and natural gas sales.



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Board of Managers and Member of
MidAmerican Funding, LLC
Des Moines, Iowa


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MidAmerican Funding, LLC and subsidiaries ("MidAmerican Funding") as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, and2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in member's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and2022, the related notes and the schedulesschedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(ii)(2) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MidAmerican Funding as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of MidAmerican Funding's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on MidAmerican Funding's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to MidAmerican Funding in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. MidAmerican Funding is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of MidAmerican Funding’sFunding's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.


Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.



Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

294


Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 5 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

MidAmerican Funding is subject to rate regulation by state public service commissions as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where MidAmerican Funding operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow MidAmerican Funding an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While MidAmerican Funding has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit MidAmerican Funding's ability to recover their costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) a disallowance of part of the cost of recently completed plant or plant under construction, and (3) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated MidAmerican Funding's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected MidAmerican Funding's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP


Des Moines, Iowa
February 23, 201824, 2023


We have served as MidAmerican Funding's auditor since 1999.



295


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$261 $233 
Trade receivables, net536 526 
Income tax receivable43 80 
Inventories277 234 
Prepayments91 71 
Other current assets66 52 
Total current assets1,274 1,196 
Property, plant and equipment, net21,092 20,302 
Goodwill1,270 1,270 
Regulatory assets550 473 
Investments and restricted investments904 1,028 
Other assets164 262 
Total assets$25,254 $24,531 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
    
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$172
 $15
Receivables, net348
 287
Income taxes receivable64
 9
Inventories245
 264
Other current assets134
 35
Total current assets963
 610
    
Property, plant and equipment, net14,221
 12,835
Goodwill1,270
 1,270
Regulatory assets204
 1,161
Investments and restricted cash and investments730
 655
Other assets233
 216
    
Total assets$17,621
 $16,747


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

296


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$536 $531 
Accrued interest90 89 
Accrued property, income and other taxes170 158 
Note payable to affiliate— 189 
Current portion of long-term debt317 — 
Other current liabilities93 146 
Total current liabilities1,206 1,113 
Long-term debt7,652 7,961 
Regulatory liabilities1,119 1,080 
Deferred income taxes3,431 3,387 
Asset retirement obligations683 714 
Other long-term liabilities484 475 
Total liabilities14,575 14,730 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Member's equity:
Paid-in capital1,679 1,679 
Retained earnings9,000 8,122 
Total member's equity10,679 9,801 
Total liabilities and member's equity$25,254 $24,531 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
    
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$451
 $302
Accrued interest53
 52
Accrued property, income and other taxes133
 138
Note payable to affiliate164
 31
Short-term debt
 99
Current portion of long-term debt350
 250
Other current liabilities128
 160
Total current liabilities1,279
 1,032
    
Long-term debt4,932
 4,377
Deferred income taxes2,235
 3,568
Regulatory liabilities1,661
 883
Asset retirement obligations528
 510
Other long-term liabilities326
 291
Total liabilities10,961
 10,661
    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
 
    
Member's equity:   
Paid-in capital1,679
 1,679
Retained earnings4,981
 4,407
Total member's equity6,660
 6,086
    
Total liabilities and member's equity$17,621
 $16,747


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



297


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$2,988 $2,529 $2,139 
Regulated natural gas and other1,037 1,018 589 
Total operating revenue4,025 3,547 2,728 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy679 539 339 
Cost of natural gas purchased for resale and other763 761 329 
Operations and maintenance828 775 755 
Depreciation and amortization1,168 914 716 
Property and other taxes149 142 135 
Total operating expenses3,587 3,131 2,274 
Operating income438 416 454 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(333)(319)(322)
Allowance for borrowed funds15 13 15 
Allowance for equity funds51 39 45 
Other, net— 54 52 
Total other income (expense)(267)(213)(210)
Income before income tax benefit171 203 244 
Income tax benefit(776)(680)(574)
Net income$947 $883 $818 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:     
Regulated electric$2,108
 $1,985
 $1,837
Regulated gas and other738
 646
 678
Total operating revenue2,846
 2,631
 2,515
      
Operating costs and expenses:     
Cost of fuel, energy and capacity434
 409
 433
Cost of gas sold and other447
 371
 407
Operations and maintenance784
 694
 707
Depreciation and amortization500
 479
 407
Property and other taxes119
 112
 110
Total operating costs and expenses2,284
 2,065
 2,064
      
Operating income562
 566
 451
      
Other income and (expense):     
Interest expense(237) (219) (206)
Allowance for borrowed funds15
 8
 8
Allowance for equity funds41
 19
 20
Other, net(9) 19
 19
Total other income and (expense)(190) (173) (159)
      
Income before income tax benefit372
 393
 292
Income tax benefit(202) (139) (150)
      
Income from continuing operations574
 532
 442
      
Discontinued operations (Note 3):     
Income from discontinued operations
 
 22
Income tax expense
 
 6
Income on discontinued operations
 
 16
      
Net income$574
 $532
 $458


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



298


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOMECHANGES IN MEMBER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)

Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Total Member's Equity
Balance, December 31, 2019$1,679 $6,422 $8,101 
Net income— 818 818 
Balance, December 31, 20201,679 7,240 8,919 
Net income— 883 883 
Other equity transactions— (1)(1)
Balance, December 31, 20211,679 8,122 9,801 
Net income— 947 947 
Distribution to member— (69)(69)
Balance, December 31, 2022$1,679 $9,000 $10,679 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net income$574
 $532
 $458
      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $-, $1 and $-
 3
 
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $-, $- and $(4)
 
 (7)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 3
 (7)
      
Comprehensive income$574
 $535
 $451


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)


299
     Accumulated  
     Other  
 
Paid-in
Capital
 
Retained
Earnings
 
Comprehensive
 Loss, Net
 Total Equity
        
Balance, December 31, 2014$1,679
 $3,417
 $(23) $5,073
Net income
 458
 
 458
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (7) (7)
Other equity transactions
 1
 
 1
Balance, December 31, 20151,679
 3,876
 (30) 5,525
Net income
 532
 
 532
Other comprehensive income
 
 3
 3
Transfer to affiliate (Note 3)


 
 27
 27
Other equity transactions
 (1) 
 (1)
Balance, December 31, 20161,679
 4,407
 
 6,086
Net income
 574
 
 574
Balance, December 31, 2017$1,679
 $4,981
 $
 $6,660



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$947 $883 $818 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization1,168 914 716 
Amortization of utility plant to other operating expenses35 34 34 
Allowance for equity funds(51)(39)(45)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits33 153 211 
Settlements of asset retirement obligations(85)(103)(124)
Other, net52 21 (17)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(11)(293)48 
Inventories(43)44 (52)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net(4)(19)
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net40 (71)(66)
Accounts payable and other liabilities68 66 32 
Net cash flows from operating activities2,161 1,605 1,536 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(1,869)(1,912)(1,836)
Purchases of marketable securities(499)(213)(281)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities492 207 269 
Proceeds from sales of other investments— — 
Other investment proceeds
Other, net11 
Net cash flows from investing activities(1,868)(1,912)(1,825)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distribution to member(69)— — 
Proceeds from long-term debt— 492 — 
Repayments of long-term debt(2)(1)— 
Net change in note payable to affiliate(189)12 
Other, net(2)(2)(1)
Net cash flows from financing activities(262)501 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents31 194 (285)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year240 46 331 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of year$271 $240 $46 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$574
 $532
 $458
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Loss on other items29
 
 
Depreciation and amortization500
 479
 407
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits334
 362
 276
Changes in other assets and liabilities37
 47
 49
Other, net(58) (92) (69)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:     
Receivables, net(60) (61) 93
Inventories19
 (27) (53)
Derivative collateral, net2
 5
 33
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net(11) (6) (8)
Accounts payable69
 39
 (76)
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net(54) 107
 213
Other current assets and liabilities(1) 8
 12
Net cash flows from operating activities1,380
 1,393
 1,335
      
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Utility construction expenditures(1,773) (1,636) (1,446)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities(143) (138) (142)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities137
 158
 135
Proceeds from sales of other investments2
 2
 13
Net increase in restricted cash and short-term investments(98) (10) 
Other, net(2) 10
 2
Net cash flows from investing activities(1,877) (1,614) (1,438)
      
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from long-term debt990
 62
 649
Repayments of long-term debt(341) (38) (426)
Net change in note payable to affiliate133
 9
 3
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt(99) 99
 (50)
Tender offer premium paid(29) 
 
Other, net
 1
 
Net cash flows from financing activities654
 133
 176
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents157
 (88) 73
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year15
 103
 30
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$172
 $15
 $103


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



300


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(1)
Company Organization

(1)Organization and Operations

MidAmerican Funding, LLC ("MidAmerican Funding") is an Iowa limited liability company with Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE") as its sole member. BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway"). MidAmerican Funding's direct wholly owned subsidiary is MHC Inc. ("MHC"), which constitutes substantially all of MidAmerican Funding's assets, liabilities and business activities except those related to MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt securities. MHC conducts no business other than the ownership of its subsidiaries and related corporate services.subsidiaries. MHC's principal subsidiary is MidAmerican Energy Company ("MidAmerican Energy"), a public utility with electric and natural gas operations. Direct,operations, and its direct, wholly owned nonregulated subsidiaries of MHC aresubsidiary is Midwest Capital Group, Inc. ("Midwest Capital Group") and MEC Construction Services Co..


(2)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

In addition to the following significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements for significant accounting policies of MidAmerican Funding.


Basis ofConsolidation and Presentation


The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of MidAmerican Funding and its subsidiaries in which it held a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated, other than those between rate-regulated operations. The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist substantially of funds restricted for wildlife preservation. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$261 $233 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents in other current assets10 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$271 $240 

Goodwill


Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired when MidAmerican Funding purchased MHC. MidAmerican Funding evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31.31, 2022. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, MidAmerican Funding estimates the fair value of theits reporting unit.units. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the estimated fair value, then the identifiable assets, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities of the reporting unit are estimated at fair value as of the current testing date. The excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit over the current estimated fair value of net assets establishes the implied value of goodwill. The excess of the recorded goodwill over the implied goodwill value is charged to earnings as an impairment loss. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. MidAmerican Funding uses a variety of methods to estimate a reporting unit's fair value, principally discounted projected future net cash flows. Key assumptions used include, but are not limited to, the use of estimated future cash flows; multiples of earnings; and an appropriate discount rate. In estimating future cash flows, MidAmerican Funding incorporates current market information, as well as historical factors. As such, theThe determination of fair value incorporates significant unobservable inputs. During 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, MidAmerican Funding did not record any goodwill impairments.


301
(3)Discontinued Operations



(3)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Refer to Note 3 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements. The transfer of MidAmerican Energy's unregulated retail services business to a subsidiary of BHE repaid $117 million of MHC's note payable to BHE.

(4)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Refer to Note 4 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements. In addition to MidAmerican Energy's property, plant and equipment, net, MidAmerican Funding had nonregulated property gross of $24$1 million and $22 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related accumulated depreciation and amortization of $10 million and $9 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and construction work-in-progress of $1 million as of December 31, 2016, which consisted primarily2022 and 2021, respectively.

(4)Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Refer to Note 4 of a corporate aircraft owned by MHC.MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements.


(5)Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

(5)Regulatory Matters

Refer to Note 5 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements.



(6)Regulatory Matters

(6)Investments and Restricted Investments

Refer to Note 6 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements.

(7)Investments and Restricted Cash and Investments

Refer to Note 7 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. In addition to MidAmerican Energy's investments and restricted cash and investments, MHC had corporate-owned life insurance policies in a Rabbi trust owned by MHC with a total cash surrender value of $2 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


(8)Short-Term Debt and Credit Facilities

(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

Refer to Note 87 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements. In addition to MidAmerican Energy's credit facilities, MHC has a $4 million unsecured credit facility, which expires in June 20182023 and has a variable interest rate based on LIBORthe Secured Overnight Financing Rate, plus a spread. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, there were no borrowings outstanding under this credit facility. As of December 31, 2017,2022, MHC was in compliance with the covenants of its credit facility.


(9)Long-Term(8)Long-term Debt


Refer to Note 98 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements for detail and a discussion of its long-term debt. In addition to MidAmerican Energy's annual repayments of long-term debt, MidAmerican Funding parent company has $239 million of 6.927% Senior Bonds due in 2029, with a carrying value of $240 million and $326 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively. In December 2017, MidAmerican Funding redeemed through a tender offer a portion of its 6.927% Senior Bonds. A charge of $29 million for the total premium is included in other income and (expense), net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.2021.


The MidAmerican Funding parent company long-term debt is secured by a pledge of the common stock of MHC. See Item 15(c) for the Consolidated Financial Statements of MHC Inc. and subsidiaries. The bonds are the direct senior secured obligations of MidAmerican Funding and effectively rank junior to all indebtedness and other liabilities of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of MidAmerican Funding, to the extent of the assets of these subsidiaries. MidAmerican Funding may redeem the bonds in whole or in part at any time at a redemption price equal to the sum of any accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption and the greater of (1) 100% of the principal amount of the bonds or (2) the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the bonds, discounted to the date of redemption on a semiannual basis at the treasury yield plus 25 basis points.


MidAmerican Funding parent company long-term debt is secured by a pledge of the common stock of MHC, which is not publicly traded. In the event of any triggering event under the related debt indenture, the common stock of MHC would be available to satisfy the applicable debt obligations. Triggering events include, among other specified circumstances, (1) default on the payment of interest for 30 days or principal for three days; (2) a material default in the performance of any material covenants or obligations in the indenture continuing for a period of 90 days after written notice in accordance with the indenture; or (3) the failure generally of MidAmerican Funding or any significant subsidiary to pay its debts when due.

Subsidiaries of MidAmerican Funding must make payments on their own indebtedness before making distributions to MidAmerican Funding. Refer to Note 98 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements for a discussion of utility regulatory restrictions affecting distributions from MidAmerican Energy. As a result of the utility regulatory restrictions agreed to by MidAmerican Energy in March 1999, MidAmerican Funding had restricted net assets of $3.7$5.4 billion as of December 31, 2017.2022.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Funding was in compliance with all of its applicable long-term debt covenants.


302


Each of MidAmerican Funding's direct or indirect subsidiaries is organized as a legal entity separate and apart from MidAmerican Funding and its other subsidiaries. It should not be assumed that any asset of any subsidiary of MidAmerican Funding will be available to satisfy the obligations of MidAmerican Funding or any of its other subsidiaries; provided, however, that unrestricted cash or other assets which are available for distribution may, subject to applicable law and the terms of financing arrangements of such parties, be advanced, loaned, paid as dividends or otherwise distributed or contributed to MidAmerican Funding, one of its subsidiaries or affiliates thereof.


(10)(9)Income Taxes

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("2017 Tax Reform") was signed into law, which impacts many areas of income tax law. The most material items include the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and limitations on bonus depreciation for utility property. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") require the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates be recognized in the period the tax rate change was enacted. As a result of the 2017 Tax Reform, MidAmerican Funding reduced deferred income tax liabilities $1,822 million. As it is probable the change in deferred taxes for the MidAmerican Funding's regulated businesses will be passed back to customers through regulatory mechanisms, MidAmerican Funding increased net regulatory liabilities by $1,845 million.

In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 to assist in the implementation process of the 2017 Tax Reform by allowing for calculations to be classified as provisional and subject to remeasurement. There are three different classifications for the accounting: (1) completed, (2) not complete but reasonably estimable or (3) not complete and amounts are not reasonably estimable. MidAmerican Funding has recorded the impacts of 2017 Tax Reform and believes all the impacts to be complete with the exception of interpretations of the bonus depreciation rules. MidAmerican Funding has determined the amounts recorded and the interpretations relating to this item to be provisional and subject to remeasurement during the measurement period upon obtaining the necessary additional information to complete the accounting. MidAmerican Funding believes its interpretations for bonus depreciation to be reasonable; however, as the guidance is clarified estimates may change. The accounting is estimated to be completed by December 2018.


MidAmerican Funding's income tax benefit from continuing operations consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current:
Federal$(773)$(739)$(689)
State(36)(94)(96)
(809)(833)(785)
Deferred:
Federal77 189 204 
State(43)(35)
34 154 212 
Investment tax credits(1)(1)(1)
Total$(776)$(680)$(574)
 2017 2016 2015
Current:     
Federal$(505) $(485) $(418)
State(31) (16) (8)
 (536) (501) (426)
Deferred:     
Federal338
 367
 282
State(3) (4) (5)
 335
 363
 277
      
Investment tax credits(1) (1) (1)
Total$(202) $(139) $(150)


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to MidAmerican Funding's the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax benefit from continuing operations is as follows for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Income tax credits(416)(283)(209)
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit(36)(50)(29)
Effects of ratemaking(26)(21)(17)
Other, net(2)(1)
Effective income tax rate(454)%(335)%(235)%
 2017 2016 2015
      
Federal statutory income tax rate35 % 35 % 35 %
Income tax credits(77) (64) (72)
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit(6) (3) (3)
Effects of ratemaking(8) (3) (12)
2017 Tax Reform3
 
 
Other, net(1) 
 1
Effective income tax rate(54)% (35)% (51)%


Income tax credits relate primarily to production tax credits ("PTC") earned by MidAmerican Energy's wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities. Federal renewable electricity production tax creditsPTCs are earned as energy from qualifying wind-poweredwind- and solar-powered generating facilities is produced and sold and are based on a per-kilowatt hour rate pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law. Interim recognition of production tax credits in income is based on the annualized effective tax rate applied each period, similar to all book to tax differences. Recognition of production tax credits in income during interim periods of the year may vary significantly from actual amounts earned. Wind-poweredWind- and solar-powered generating facilities are eligible for the credits for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in service.in-service. PTCs recognized for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 totaled $710 million, $574 million and $510 million, respectively.



303


MidAmerican Funding's net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Deferred income tax assets:
Regulatory liabilities$194 $240 
Asset retirement obligations192 220 
Revenue sharing87 33 
State carryforwards61 55 
Employee benefits37 26 
Other24 (3)
Total deferred income tax assets595 571 
Valuation allowances(2)(1)
Total deferred income tax assets, net593 570 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Depreciable property(3,895)(3,843)
Regulatory assets(128)(112)
Other(1)(2)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(4,024)(3,957)
Net deferred income tax liability$(3,431)$(3,387)
 2017 2016
Deferred income tax assets:   
Regulatory liabilities$443
 $333
Employee benefits45
 66
Asset retirement obligations160
 230
Other62
 82
Total deferred income tax assets710
 711
    
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Depreciable property(2,868) (3,767)
Regulatory assets(42) (471)
Other(35) (41)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(2,945) (4,279)
    
Net deferred income tax liability$(2,235) $(3,568)


As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Funding has available $40 million ofFunding's state tax carryforwards, principally related to $583$921 million of net operating losses, that expire at various intervals between 20182023 and 2036.2041.


The United StatesU.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of BHE'sMidAmerican Funding's income tax returns through December 31, 2009, including components related to MidAmerican Funding. In addition, state jurisdictions have closed their examinations2013. The statute of limitations for MidAmerican Funding's income tax returns have expired for Iowacertain states through December 31, 2013,2011, and for Illinoisother states through December 31, 2008, and2018, except for other jurisdictions through December 31, 2009.the impact of any federal audit adjustments. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, for state filings may not preclude the state from adjusting the state net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of MidAmerican Funding's net unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$13 $
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year15 16 
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year(12)(11)
Ending balance$16 $13 
 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$10
 $10
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year1
 
Additions for tax positions of prior years23
 10
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year(4) (2)
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(19) (8)
Interest and penalties1
 
Ending balance$12
 $10


As of December 31, 2017,2022, MidAmerican Funding had unrecognized tax benefits totaling $39 million that, if recognized, would have an impact on the effective tax rate. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions for which ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty as to the timing of such deductibility. Recognition of these tax benefits, other than applicable interest and penalties, would not affect MidAmerican Funding's effective income tax rate.



304
(11)Employee Benefit Plans



(10)Employee Benefit Plans

Refer to Note 1110 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements for additional information regarding MidAmerican Funding's pension, supplemental retirement and postretirement benefit plans.


Pension and postretirement costs allocated by MidAmerican Funding to its parent and other affiliates in each of the years ended December 31, were as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Pension costs$$21 $
Other postretirement costs(3)

(11)Asset Retirement Obligations
 2017 2016 2015
      
Pension costs$4
 $4
 $4
Other postretirement costs(3) (1) (2)


Refer to Note 11 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements.

(12)Asset Retirement Obligations

(12)Fair Value Measurements

Refer to Note 12 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements.

(13)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

Refer to Note 13 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements.

(14)Fair Value Measurements

Refer to Note 14 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements.


MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Financial Statements. The fair value of MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The carrying value of MidAmerican Funding's variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value because of the frequent repricing of these instruments at market rates. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
Carrying
Value
Fair Value
Long-term debt$7,969 $7,219 $7,961 $9,350 

 2017 2016
 
Carrying
Value
 Fair Value 
Carrying
Value
 Fair Value
        
Long-term debt$5,282
 $6,006
 $4,627
 $5,164

(15)(13)Commitments and Contingencies


Refer to Note 1513 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements.


Legal Matters


MidAmerican Funding is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. MidAmerican Funding does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.


(16)Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

(14)    Revenue from Contracts with Customers

Refer to Note 1614 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements. Additionally, MidAmerican Funding had $— million, $— million and $8 million of other revenue from contracts with customers for the year ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.


(17)
(15)Member's Equity

In 2022, MidAmerican Funding paid a $69 million cash distribution to its parent company, BHE. In January 2023, MidAmerican Funding paid a $100 million cash distribution to its parent company, BHE.

305


(16)Other Income and (Expense) - Other, Net


Other, net, as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, includes the following other income (expense) items for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Non-service cost components of postretirement employee benefit plans$$26 $24 
Corporate-owned life insurance (loss) income(16)21 16 
Gains on disposition of assets— — 
Interest income and other, net
Total$— $54 $52 
 2017 2016 2015
      
Corporate-owned life insurance income$13
 $8
 $4
Gain on redemption of auction rate securities
 5
 
Gains on sales of assets and other investments1
 3
 13
Loss on debt tender offer(29) 
 
Interest income and other, net6
 3
 2
Total$(9) $19
 $19

Refer to Note 9 for information regarding the debt tender offer. MidAmerican Funding recognized a $13 million pre-tax gain on the sale of an investment in a generating facility lease in 2015.

(18)(17)Supplemental Cash Flow Information


The summary of supplemental cash flow information as of and for the years ending December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$309 $296 $302 
Income taxes received, net$845 $751 $715 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$168 $257 $227 

(18)Related Party Transactions
 2017 2016 2015
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$218
 $204
 $177
Income taxes received, net$472
 $609
 $630
      
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing transactions:     
Accounts payable related to utility plant additions$224
 $131
 $249
Transfer of assets and liabilities to affiliate (Note 3)$
 $90
 $

(19)Related Party Transactions


The companies identified as affiliates of MidAmerican Funding are Berkshire Hathaway and its subsidiaries, including BHE and its subsidiaries. The basis for the following transactions is provided for in servicein-service agreements between MidAmerican Funding and the affiliates.


MidAmerican Funding is reimbursed for charges incurred on behalf of its affiliates. The majority of these reimbursed expenses are for allocated general costs, such as insurance and building rent, and for employee wages, benefits and costs for corporate functions, such as information technology, human resources, treasury, legal and accounting. The amount of such reimbursements was $77 million, $65 million and $46 million $35 millionfor 2022, 2021 and $35 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015,2020, respectively.


MidAmerican Funding reimbursed BHE in the amount of $9$79 million, $6$72 million and $7$15 million in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively, for its share of corporate expenses.expenses and other costs. Amounts charged to MidAmerican Funding in 2022 and 2021 were primarily reflected in construction work-in-progress on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.


MidAmerican Energy purchases, in the normal course of business at either tariffed or market prices. natural gas transportation and storage capacity services from Northern Natural Gas Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE and coal transportation services from BNSF Railway Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, in the normal course of business at either tariffed or market prices.Hathaway. These purchases totaled $122$141 million, $135$132 million and $165$129 million in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Additionally, in 2020, MidAmerican Energy paid $7 million to BHE Renewables, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, for the purchase of wind turbine components.


MHC has a $300 million revolving credit arrangement carrying interest at the 30-day LIBOR rateSOFR, plus a spread to borrow from BHE. Outstanding balances are unsecured and due on demand. The outstanding balance was $164$— million as of December 31, 2022, and $189 million at an interest rate of 1.629%0.353% as of December 31, 2017, and $31 million at an interest rate of 0.885% as of December 31, 2016,2021, and is reflected as note payable to affiliate on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. During 2022, MHC received $275 million in the form of a dividend from MidAmerican Energy that was used to pay off the note payable to BHE.



BHE has a $100 million revolving credit arrangement, carrying interest at the 30-day LIBOR rateSOFR, plus a spread to borrow from MHC. Outstanding balances are unsecured and due on demand. There were no borrowings outstanding throughout 20172022 and 2016.2021.


306


MidAmerican Funding had accounts receivable from affiliates of $9$10 million and $7$11 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, that are included in receivables, netother current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. MidAmerican Funding also had accounts payable to affiliates of $14$22 million and $12$17 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, that are included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


MidAmerican Funding is party to a tax-sharing agreement and is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated United StatesU.S. federal income tax return. For current federal and state income taxes, MidAmerican Funding had a receivable from BHE of $64$43 million and $80 million as of December 31, 2017,2022 and a payable to BHE of $7 million as of December 31, 2016.2021, respectively. MidAmerican Funding received net cash receiptspayments for federal and state income taxes from BHE totaling $472$845 million, $609$751 million and $631$715 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


MidAmerican Funding recognizes the full amount of the funded status for its pension and postretirement plans, and amounts attributable to MidAmerican Funding's affiliates that have not previously been recognized through income are recognized as an intercompany balance with such affiliates. MidAmerican Funding adjusts these balances when changes to the funded status of the respective plans are recognized and does not intend to settle the balances currently. Amounts receivable from affiliates attributable to the funded status of employee benefit plans totaled $16$79 million and $12$124 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, and similarare included in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Similar amounts payable to affiliates totaled $45$40 million and $36$63 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively.2021, respectively, and are included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 1110 for further information pertaining to pension and postretirement accounting.


The indenture pertaining to MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt restricts MidAmerican Funding from paying a distribution on its equity securities, unless after making such distribution either its debt to total capital ratio does not exceed 0.67:11.0 and its interest coverage ratio is not less than 2.2:11.0 or its senior secured long-term debt rating is at least BBB or its equivalent. MidAmerican Funding may seek a release from this restriction upon delivery to the indenture trustee of written confirmation from the ratings agencies that without this restriction MidAmerican Funding's senior secured long-term debt would be rated at least BBB+.


(20)Segment Information

(19)Segment Information

MidAmerican Funding has identified two reportable operating segments: regulated electric and regulated natural gas. The previously reported nonregulated energy segment consisted substantially of MidAmerican Energy's unregulated retail services business, which was transferred to a subsidiary of BHE and is excluded from the information below related to the statements of operations for all periods presented. The regulated electric segment derives most of its revenue from regulated retail sales of electricity to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and from wholesale sales. The regulated natural gas segment derives most of its revenue from regulated retail sales of natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and also obtains revenue by transporting natural gas owned by others through its distribution system. Pricing for regulated electric and regulated natural gas sales are established separately by regulatory agencies; therefore, management also reviews each segment separately to make decisions regarding allocation of resources and in evaluating performance. Common operating costs, interest income, interest expense and income tax expense are allocated to each segment based on certain factors, which primarily relate to the nature of the cost. "Other" in the tables below consists of the nonregulated subsidiaries of MidAmerican Funding not engaged in the energy business and parent company interest expense. Refer to Note 109 for a discussion of items affecting income tax (benefit) expense for the regulated electric and natural gas operating segments.


The following tables provide information on a reportable segment basis (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$2,988 $2,529 $2,139 
Regulated natural gas1,030 1,003 573 
Other15 16 
Total operating revenue$4,025 $3,547 $2,728 
Depreciation and amortization:
Regulated electric$1,112 $861 $667 
Regulated natural gas56 53 49 
Total depreciation and amortization$1,168 $914 $716 
307


Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating income:Operating income:
Regulated electricRegulated electric$372 $358 $384 
Regulated natural gasRegulated natural gas66 58 64 
OtherOther— — 
Total operating incomeTotal operating income$438 $416 $454 
Years Ended December 31,
2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:     
Regulated electric$2,108
 $1,985
 $1,837
Regulated gas719
 637
 661
Other19
 9
 17
Total operating revenue$2,846
 $2,631
 $2,515
     
Depreciation and amortization:     
Regulated electric$458
 $436
 $366
Regulated gas42
 43
 41
Total depreciation and amortization$500
 $479
 $407
     
Operating income:     
Regulated electric$485
 $497
 $385
Regulated gas77
 68
 64
Other
 1
 2
Total operating income$562
 $566
 $451
     
Interest expense:     Interest expense:
Regulated electric$196
 $178
 $166
Regulated electric$290 $279 $281 
Regulated gas18
 18
 17
Regulated natural gasRegulated natural gas23 23 23 
Other23
 23
 23
Other20 17 18 
Total interest expense$237
 $219
 $206
Total interest expense$333 $319 $322 
     
Income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations:     
Income tax (benefit) expense:Income tax (benefit) expense:
Regulated electric$(212) $(156) $(163)Regulated electric$(779)$(677)$(584)
Regulated gas29
 22
 16
Regulated natural gasRegulated natural gas14 
Other(19) (5) (3)Other(6)(6)(4)
Total income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations$(202) $(139) $(150)
Total income tax (benefit) expenseTotal income tax (benefit) expense$(776)$(680)$(574)
     
Net income:     Net income:
Regulated electric$570
 $512
 $413
Regulated electric$931 $844 $780 
Regulated gas35
 32
 33
Regulated natural gasRegulated natural gas30 50 45 
Other(31) (12) (4)Other(14)(11)(7)
Income from continuing operations574
 532
 442
Income on discontinued operations
 
 16
Net income$574
 $532
 $458
Net income$947 $883 $818 
     
Utility construction expenditures:     
Capital expenditures:Capital expenditures:
Regulated electric$1,686
 $1,564
 $1,365
Regulated electric$1,742 $1,806 $1,704 
Regulated gas87
 72
 81
Total utility construction expenditures$1,773
 $1,636
 $1,446
Regulated natural gasRegulated natural gas127 106 132 
Total capital expendituresTotal capital expenditures$1,869 $1,912 $1,836 

As of December 31,
202220212020
Total assets:
Regulated electric$23,283 $22,576 $21,083 
Regulated natural gas1,963 1,950 1,623 
Other
Total assets$25,254 $24,531 $22,711 

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Total assets:     
Regulated electric$16,105
 $15,304
 $14,161
Regulated gas1,482
 1,424
 1,330
Other34
 19
 183
Total assets$17,621
 $16,747
 $15,674


Goodwill by reportable segment as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, was as follows (in millions):
Regulated electric$1,191
Regulated gas79
Total$1,270

(21)Regulated electricUnaudited Quarterly Operating Results$1,191 
Regulated natural gas79 
Total$1,270 


308
 2017
 
1st Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
4th Quarter
 (In millions)
Operating revenue$696
 $659
 $815
 $676
Operating income107
 136
 288
 31
Net income (loss)102
 131
 383
 (42)



 2016
 
1st Quarter
 
2nd Quarter
 
3rd Quarter
 
4th Quarter
 (In millions)
Operating revenue$626
 $585
 $797
 $623
Operating income100
 140
 284
 42
Net income73
 127
 318
 14

Quarterly operating results are affected by, among other things, MidAmerican Energy's seasonal retail electricity prices, the timing of recognition of federal renewable electricity production tax credits related to MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities and the seasonal impact of weather on electricity and natural gas sales.


Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section



Item 6.        Selected Financial Data
309


Information required by Item 6 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(a) to Form 10-K.


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

General

Nevada Power's revenues and operating income are subject to fluctuations during the year due to impacts that seasonal weather, rate changes, and customer usage patterns have on demand for electric energy and resources. Nevada Power is a summer peaking utility experiencing its highest retail energy sales in response to the demand for air conditioning. The variations in energy usage due to varying weather, customer growth and other energy usage patterns, including energy efficiency and conservation measures, necessitates a continual balancing of loads and resources and purchases and sales of energy under short- and long-term energy supply contracts. As a result, the prudent management and optimization of available resources has a direct effect on the operating and financial performance of Nevada Power. Additionally, the timely recovery of purchased power, fuel costs and other costs and the ability to earn a fair return on investments through rates are essential to the operating and financial performance of Nevada Power.


The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Nevada Power during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Nevada Power's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K. Nevada Power's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.


Results of Operations


Overview

Net income for the year ended December 31, 20172022 was $255$298 million, a decrease of $24$5 million, or 9%2%, compared to 2016, which includes $5 million of expense from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (the "2017 Tax Reform"). Excluding the impact of the 2017 Tax Reform, adjusted net income was $260 million, a decrease of $19 million compared to 2016,2021, primarily due to expenses relatedlower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and higher pension expense, higher interest expense, primarily due to the Nevada Power regulatory rate review of $28 million,higher long-term debt, higher depreciation and amortization, primarilymainly due to higher plant placed in-service, higher property and other taxes, mainly due to a decrease in the amount of $5 million. The decrease wasabatements available, higher operations and maintenance expenses, mainly due to higher earnings sharing and higher plant operations and maintenance expenses, partially offset by higher margins of $11 million, excluding the impact of a decrease in energy efficiency program rate revenue of $22 million (offset in operationsinterest and maintenance),dividend income, primarily from carrying charges on regulatory balances, higher capitalized interest and lower interest expense of $9 million on lower deferred chargesallowance for funds used during construction from higher construction work-in-progress and lower rates on outstanding debt balances. Marginshigher utility margin. Utility margin increased primarily due to higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals and higher retail customer usage patterns and customer growth,volumes, partially offset by unfavorable price impacts from changes in sales mix, lower margins from customers purchasing energy from alternative providerstransmission and becomingwholesale revenue and lower other retail revenue. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers.customers, increased 1.9% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers and favorable changes in customer usage, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather. Energy generated decreased 4% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower natural gas-fueled generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes increased 65% and purchased electricity volumes increased 14%.


Net income for the year ended December 31, 20162021 was $279$303 million, a decreasean increase of $9$8 million, or 3%, compared to 2015. Net income decreased2020, primarily due to lower margins from changes in usage patterns with commercialoperations and industrial customers, lower customer usagemaintenance expenses, primarily due to customer demandlower net regulatory instructed deferrals and amortizations, lower earnings sharing and lower plant operations and maintenance expenses, lower income tax expense primarily due to the impactsrecognition of weather, benefitsamortization of excess deferred income taxes following regulatory approval effective January 2021, $10 million of higher interest and dividend income, mainly from changescarrying charges on regulatory balances, lower interest expense and higher other, net. These increases are offset by lower utility margin, primarily due to lower retail rates from the 2020 regulatory rate review with new rates effective January 2021, lower revenue recognized due to a favorable regulatory decision in contingent liabilities2020 and an adjustment to regulatory-related revenue deferrals, partially offset by an increase in 2015the average number of customers and higher transmission revenue, and higher depreciation and amortization, mainly due to regulatory amortizations approved in the 2020 regulatory rate review effective January 2021 and higher plant placed in-service. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased3.5% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers and favorable changes in customer usage patterns, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather. Energy generated increased 1% for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher natural gas-fueled generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes decreased 5% and purchased electricity volumes increased 10%.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Management utilizes various key financial measures that are prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as, utility margin, to help evaluate results of operations. Utility margin is calculated as operating revenue less cost of fuel and energy, which are captions presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Nevada Power's cost of fuel and energy is generally recovered from its retail customers through regulatory recovery mechanisms and, as a result, changes in Nevada Power's expenses included in regulatory recovery mechanisms result in comparable changes to revenue. As such, management believes utility margin more appropriately and concisely explains profitability rather than a discussion of revenue and cost of fuel and energy separately. Management believes the presentation of utility margin provides meaningful and valuable insight into the information management considers important to running the business and a measure of comparability to others in the industry.

Utility margin is not a measure calculated in accordance with GAAP and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating income, which is the most directly comparable financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP.
310


The following table provides a reconciliation of utility margin to operating income for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin:
Operating revenue$2,630 $2,139 $491 23 %$2,139 $1,998 $141 %
Cost of fuel and energy1,427 939 488 52 939 816 123 15 
Utility margin1,203 1,200 — 1,200 1,182 18 
Operations and maintenance303 301 301 299 
Depreciation and amortization417 406 11 406 361 45 12 
Property and other taxes53 48 10 48 47 
Operating income$430 $445 $(15)(3)%$445 $475 $(30)(6)%






























311


Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to utility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:

20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$2,630 $2,139 $491 23 %$2,139 $1,998 $141 %
Cost of fuel and energy1,427 939 488 52 939 816 123 15 
Utility margin$1,203 $1,200 $— %$1,200 $1,182 $18 %
Sales (GWhs):
Residential10,299 10,415 (116)(1)%10,415 10,477 (62)(1)%
Commercial4,904 4,838 66 4,838 4,591 247 
Industrial5,630 5,270 360 5,270 4,881 389 
Other191 198 (7)(4)198 195 
Total fully bundled(1)
21,024 20,721 303 20,721 20,144 577 
Distribution only service2,786 2,646 140 2,646 2,425 221 
Total retail23,810 23,367 443 23,367 22,569 798 
Wholesale586 356 230 65 356 374 (18)(5)
Total GWhs sold24,396 23,723 673 %23,723 22,943 780 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)1,001 985 16 %985 968 17 %
Average revenue per MWh:
Retail - fully bundled(1)
$120.21 $98.62 $21.59 22 %$98.62 $94.83 $3.79 %
Wholesale$61.83 $60.69 $1.14 %$60.69 $42.83 $17.86 42 %
Heating degree days1,904 1,613 291 18 %1,613 1,753 (140)(8)%
Cooling degree days4,016 4,109 (93)(2)%4,109 4,236 (127)(3)%
Sources of energy (GWhs)(2)(3):
Natural gas13,068 13,655 (587)(4)%13,655 13,545 110 %
Renewables69 65 65 66 (1)(2)
Total energy generated13,137 13,720 (583)(4)13,720 13,611 109 
Energy purchased8,830 7,778 1,052 14 7,778 7,044 734 10 
Total21,967 21,498 469 %21,498 20,655 843 %
Average cost of energy per MWh(4):
Energy generated$49.82 $24.41 $25.42 104 %$24.41 $16.58 $7.83 47 %
Energy purchased$87.49 $77.64 $9.85 13 %$77.64 $83.74 $(6.10)(7)%

(1)    Fully bundled includes sales to customers for combined energy, transmission and distribution services.
(2)    The average cost of energy per MWh and sources of energy excludes 1,113, 1,389 and 1,614 GWhs of natural gas generated energy that is purchased at cost by related parties for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(3)    GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.
(4)    The average cost of energy per MWh includes only the cost of fuel associated with the generating facilities, purchased power and deferrals.
312


Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021

Utility margin increased $3 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to:
$11 million of higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals and
$4 million of higher electric retail utility margin due to higher retail customer volumes, offset by unfavorable price impacts from changes in sales mix. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 1.9% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers and favorable changes in customer usage, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather.
The increase in utility margin was partially offset by:
$6 million of lower energy efficiency program rates (offset in operations and maintenance expense);
$3 million of lower transmission and wholesale revenue; and
$3 million due to lower other retail revenue.

Operations and maintenance increased $2 million, or 1%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher earnings sharing and higher plant operations and maintenance expenses, partially offset by lower energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue).

Depreciation and amortization increased $11 million, or 3%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher plant placed in-service. The

Property and other taxes increased $5 million, or 10%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to a decrease in netthe amount of abatements available.

Interest expense increased $12 million, or 8%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher long-term debt.

Capitalized interest increased $5 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher construction work-in-progress.

Allowance for equity funds increased $4 million, or 57%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher construction work-in-progress.

Interest and dividend income increased $27 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher interest income, was offset bymainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances.

Other, net decreased $15 million, or 83%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies and higher customer growth and lower interest expense from the redemption of $210 million Series M, 5.950% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes in 2016.pension expense.



Operating revenue and cost of fuel, energy and capacity are key drivers of Nevada Power's results of operations as they encompass retail and wholesale electricity revenue and the direct costs associated with providing electricity to customers. Nevada Power believes that a discussion of gross margin, representing operating revenue less cost of fuel, energy and capacity, is therefore meaningful.

A comparison of Nevada Power's key operating results related to gross margin for the years ended December 31 is as follows:
  2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
Gross margin (in millions):              
Operating revenue $2,206
 $2,083
 $123
6 % $2,083
 $2,402
 $(319)(13)%
Cost of fuel, energy and capacity 902
 768
 134
17
 768
 1,084
 (316)(29)
Gross margin $1,304
 $1,315
 $(11)(1) $1,315
 $1,318
 $(3)
               
GWh sold:              
Residential 9,501
 9,394
 107
1 % 9,394
 9,246
 148
2 %
Commercial 4,656
 4,663
 (7)
 4,663
 4,635
 28
1
Industrial 6,201
 7,313
 (1,112)(15) 7,313
 7,571
 (258)(3)
Other 212
 212
 

 212
 214
 (2)(1)
Total fully bundled(1)
 20,570
 21,582
 (1,012)(5) 21,582
 21,666
 (84)
Distribution only service 1,830
 662
 1,168
  *
 662
 407
 255
63
Total retail 22,400
 22,244
 156
1
 22,244
 22,073
 171
1
Wholesale 314
 258
 56
22
 258
 353
 (95)(27)
Total GWh sold 22,714
 22,502
 212
1
 22,502
 22,426
 76

               
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):              
Residential 810
 796
 14
2 % 796
 782
 14
2 %
Commercial 106
 105
 1
1
 105
 104
 1
1
Industrial 2
 2
 

 2
 2
 

Total 918
 903
 15
2
 903
 888
 15
2
               
Average per MWh:              
Revenue - fully bundled(1)
 $104.57
 $94.27
 $10.30
11 % $94.27
 $108.49
 $(14.22)(13)%
Total cost of energy(2)
 $41.84
 $34.00
 $7.84
23 % $34.00
 $48.04
 $(14.04)(29)%
               
Heating degree days 1,265
 1,508
 (243)(16)% 1,508
 1,491
 17
1 %
Cooling degree days 4,044
 4,002
 42
1 % 4,002
 4,069
 (67)(2)%
               
Sources of energy (GWh)(3):
              
Coal 1,449
 1,480
 (31)(2)% 1,480
 1,556
 (76)(5)%
Natural gas 13,172
 14,577
 (1,405)(10) 14,577
 14,567
 10

Other 73
 61
 12
20
 61
 4
 57
  *
Total energy generated 14,694
 16,118
 (1,424)(9) 16,118
 16,127
 (9)
Energy purchased 6,858
 6,462
 396
6
 6,462
 6,431
 31

Total 21,552
 22,580
 (1,028)(5) 22,580
 22,558
 22

*Not meaningful
(1)Fully bundled includes sales to customers for combined energy, transmission and distribution services.
(2)The average total cost of energy per MWh includes the cost of fuel, purchased power and deferrals and does not include other costs.
(3)GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.

Year Ended December 31, 20172021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162020


GrossUtility margin decreased $11 increased $18 million for 20172021 compared to 20162020 due to:
$32the $120 million one-time bill credit returned to customers in lower commercial and industrial retail revenue from customers purchasing energy from alternative providers and becoming distribution only service customers and
2020 as a result of the Nevada Power regulatory rate review stipulation ("$22120 million in lower energy efficiency program rate revenue, which is offsetbill credit") (offset in operations and maintenance.maintenance expense and income tax expense) and
$5 million of higher transmission revenue.
The decreaseincrease in grossutility margin was partially offset by:
$2166 million inof lower retail electric utility margin primarily due to lower retail rates due to the 2020 regulatory rate review with new rates effective January 2021, offset by higher other retail revenue primarily from impact fees and revenue relating to customers becomingcustomer volumes. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers;
$9 million from customer usage patterns;
$7 million due to customer growth and
$6 million in higher transmission revenuecustomers, increased 3.5% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers becoming distribution only service customers.and favorable changes in customer usage patterns, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather;

$21 million of lower revenue recognized due to a favorable regulatory decision in 2020;
Operations and maintenance decreased $1$10 million for 2017 compared to 2016 due to lower energy efficiency program expenserates (offset in operations and maintenance expense);
$6 million due to an adjustment to regulatory-related revenue deferrals; and
$4 million due to a regulatory amortization of an impact fee that ended December 2020.
313



Operations and maintenance increased $2 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to regulatory liability amortization in 2020 to satisfy a portion of the $120 million bill credit of $94 million (offset in operating revenue), partially offset by lower net regulatory instructed deferrals and amortizations of $22$46 million, mainly relating to deferrals in 2020 of the non-labor cost savings from the Navajo generating station retirement which was approved for amortization in the 2020 regulatory rate review with new rates effective January 2021, and timing of the regulatory impacts for the ON Line lease cost reallocation, lower earnings sharing, lower energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue) and lower plant operations and maintenance expenses.

Depreciation and amortization increased $45 million, or 12%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to regulatory amortizations approved in the 2020 regulatory rate review effective January 2021 and higher plant placed in-service.

Interest expense decreased $9 million, or 6% for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower carrying charges on regulatory balances of $6 million and lower planned maintenance, partially offset by higher expenses related to the regulatory rate review of $25 million.interest expense on long-term debt.


DepreciationInterest and amortizationdividend income increased $5$10 million or 2%, for 20172021 compared to 20162020 primarily due to higher plant placed in-service.interest income, mainly

from carrying charges on regulatory balances.
Property and other taxes
Other, net increased $2$9 million or 5%, for 20172021 compared to 2016 due to a reduction in property tax abatements.

Other income (expense) is favorable $3 million, or 2%, for 2017 compared to 20162020 primarily due to lower interestpension expense on deferred chargesof $6 million and the redemptionhigher cash surrender value of $210 million Series M, 5.950% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes in 2016, partially offset by lower allowance for funds used during construction and expenses related to the regulatory rate review.corporate-owned life insurance policies.


Income tax expense increased decreased $10 million, or 7%21%, for 20172021 compared to 2016.2020. The effective tax rate was 38%11% in 20172021 and 34%14% in 2016. The increase in the effective tax rate is2020 and decreased primarily due to the effectsrecognition of 2017 Tax Reform and the qualified production activities deduction in 2016.

Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Gross margin decreased $3 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to:
$9 million in usage patterns for commercial and industrial customers;
$8 million due to lower customer usage, due to the impactsamortization of weather and
$2 million in transmission revenue.
The decrease in gross margin was offset by:
$16 million due to higher customer growth.

Operations and maintenance increased $22 million, or 6%, for 2016 compared to 2015 due to benefits from changes in contingent liabilities in 2015, higher generating costs and disallowances resulting fromexcess deferred income taxes following regulatory rate reviews.

Depreciation and amortization increased $6 million, or 2%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to higher plant placed in-service.

Property and other taxes increased$2 million, or 6%, for 2016 compared to 2015 due to a reduction in property tax abatements,approval effective January 2021, partially offset by lower assessed property values.the one-time recognition in 2020 of amortization of excess deferred income taxes to satisfy a portion of the $120 million bill credit (offset in operating revenue).


Other income (expense) is favorable $8 million, or 5%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to lower interest expense from the redemption of $210 million Series M, 5.950% General and Refunding Mortgage Notes in 2016.

Income tax expense decreased $16 million, or 10%, for 2016 compared to 2015. The effective tax rate was 34% in 2016 and 36% in 2015. The decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the qualified production activities deduction.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


As of December 31, 2017,2022, Nevada Power's total net liquidity was $457$443 million as follows (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents $57
Credit facilities(1)
 400
Total net liquidity $457
Credit facilities:  
Maturity dates 2020

(1)Cash and cash equivalents$43 
Refer to Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding Nevada Power's credit facility.Credit facilities(1)
400 
Total net liquidity$443 
Credit facilities:
Maturity dates2025


(1)Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding Nevada Power's credit facility.

Operating Activities


Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $667$355 million and $771$505 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher intercompany tax payments related to fuel and higher impact fees received in 2016,energy costs and the timing of payments for operating costs, partially offset by a 2016 contribution to the pension plan.higher collections from customers and lower payments for income taxes.


Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $771$505 million and $892$467 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to decreased collections from customers due to lower retail rates as a result of deferred energy adjustment mechanisms, a 2016 contribution to the pension plan and increased operating costs. The decrease was offset by the receipt of impact fees from MGM Resorts International and Wynn Las Vegas, lower payments for fuel costs, settlement payments of contingent liabilities in 2015 and higher collections from customers, timing of payments for renewableoperating costs, increased collections of customer advances and lower inventory purchases, partially offset by the timing of payments for fuel and energy programs.costs and higher payments for income taxes.


Nevada Power's income tax cash flows benefited in 2017, 2016 and 2015 from 50% bonus depreciation on qualifying assets placed in service and from investment tax credits earned on qualifying solar projects. In December 2017, the 2017 Tax Reform was enacted which, among other items, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, eliminates bonus depreciation on qualifying regulated utility assets acquired after September 27, 2017 and eliminates the deduction for production activities, but did not impact investment tax credits. Nevada Power believes for qualifying assets acquired on or before September 27, 2017, bonus depreciation will remain available for 2018 and 2019. In February 2018, the Nevada Utilities made filings with the PUCN proposing a tax rate reduction rider for the lower annual income tax expense anticipated to result from the 2017 Tax Reform for 2018 and beyond. The filing supports an annual rate reduction of $59 million. Nevada Power expects lower revenue and income taxes as well as lower bonus depreciation benefits as a result of the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment. Nevada Power does not expect the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment to have a material adverse impact on its cash flows, subject to actual regulatory outcomes. Refer to Regulatory Matters in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory matters associated with the 2017 Tax Reform. The timing of Nevada Power's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.


314


Investing Activities


Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $(343)$(862) million and $(335)$(447) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to increased capital expenditures and the acquisitionissuance of the remaining 25% ownership in the Silverhawk generating station, partially offset by decreasedan affiliate note receivable. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.


Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $(335)$(447) million and $(301)$(429) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to increased capital maintenance expenditures and proceeds received from the saleexpenditures. Refer to "Future Uses of assets and an equity investment in 2015.Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.


Financing Activities


Net cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $(546)$522 million and $(693)$(49) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to lower repayments of long‑term debt andhigher proceeds from the issuance of long‑termlong-term debt, partially offset by higherlower dividends paid to NV Energy, Inc. in 2017.and higher contributions from NV Energy, Inc., partially offset by higher repayments of short-term debt.


Net cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $(693)$(49) million and $(275)$(27) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to lower proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and higher dividends paid to NV Energy, Inc., partially offset by lower repayments of long-term debt and higher net proceeds from short-term debt.


Ability to Issue Debt


Nevada Power currently has an effective shelf registration statement with the SEC to issue up to $2.6 billion of general and refunding mortgage securities through November 1, 2025. Additionally, Nevada Power's ability to issue debt is primarily impacted by its financing authority from the PUCN. As of December 31, 2017,2022, Nevada Power has financing authority from the PUCN consisting of the ability to: (1)to issue long-term and short-term debt securities so long as the total amount of updebt outstanding (excluding borrowings under Nevada Power's $400 million secured credit facility) does not exceed $3.8 billion and to $1.3 billion; (2) refinancing authority up to $1.2issue common and preferred stock so long as the total amounts outstanding do not exceed $4.1 billion and $800 million, respectively, as measured at the end of long-term debt securities; and (3) maintain a revolving credit facility of up to $1.3 billion.each calendar quarter. Nevada Power's revolving credit facility contains a financial maintenance covenant which Nevada Power was in compliance with as of December 31, 2017.2022. In addition, certain financing agreements contain covenants which are currently suspended as Nevada Power's senior secured debt is rated investment grade. However, if Nevada Power's senior secured debt ratings fall below investment grade by either Moody's Investor Service or Standard & Poor's, Nevada Power would be subject to limitations under these covenants.


Ability to Issue General and Refunding Mortgage Securities


To the extent Nevada Power has the ability to issue debt under the most restrictive covenants in its financing agreements and has financing authority to do so from the PUCN, Nevada Power's ability to issue secured debt is limited by the amount of bondable property or retired bonds that can be used to issue debt under Nevada Power's indenture.


Nevada Power's indenture creates a lien on substantially all of Nevada Power's properties in Nevada. As of December 31, 2017, $8.42022, $9.8 billion of Nevada Power's assets were pledged. Nevada Power had the capacity to issue $2.9$3.3 billion of additional general and refunding mortgage securities as of December 31, 20172022, determined on the basis of 70% of net utility property additions. Property additions include plant-in-service and specific assets in construction work-in-progress. The amount of bond capacity listed above does not include eligible property in construction work-in-progress. Nevada Power also has the ability to release property from the lien of Nevada Power's indenture on the basis of net property additions, cash or retired bonds. To the extent Nevada Power releases property from the lien of Nevada Power's indenture, it will reduce the amount of securities issuable under the indenture.


Long-Term Debt

In October 2022, Nevada Power issued $400 million of 5.90% General and Refunding Mortgage bonds, Series GG, due 2053. The net proceeds were used to repay amounts outstanding under its existing revolving credit facility, to fund capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes.

315


In January 2022, Nevada Power entered into a $300 million secured delayed draw term loan facility maturing in January 2024. Amounts borrowed under the facility bear interest at variable rates based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a pricing margin. In January 2022, Nevada Power borrowed $200 million under the facility at an initial interest rate of 0.55%. In May 2022, Nevada Power drew the remaining $100 million available under the facility at an initial interest rate of 1.24%. Nevada Power used the proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under its existing secured credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

Future Uses of Cash


Nevada Power has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the use of secured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which Nevada Power has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including Nevada Power's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with Nevada Power and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.

Capital Expenditures


Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Prudently incurred expenditures for compliance-related items such as pollution control technologies, replacement generation and associated operating costs are generally incorporated into Nevada Power's regulated retail rates. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisition of existing assets.


Historical and forecasted capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Electric distribution$232 $184 $236 $276 $276 $275 
Electric transmission35 57 110 100 333 427 
Solar generation— 85 144 
Electric battery storage— — 271 — — 
Other188 200 323 512 342 150 
Total$455 $449 $762 $1,303 $953 $853 
 Historical Forecasted
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
            
Generation development$45
 $1
 $
 $10
 $42
 $18
Distribution102
 144
 110
 164
 171
 161
Transmission system investment63
 30
 9
 34
 25
 17
Other110
 160
 151
 120
 95
 93
Total$320
 $335
 $270
 $328
 $333
 $289


Nevada Power received PUCN approval through its recent IRP filings for an increase in solar generation and electric transmission and has included estimates from its IRP filings in its forecast capital expenditures for 2023 through 2025. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. Nevada Power's historical and forecast capital expenditures include investments thatthe following:

Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Growth projects primarily relate to operating projects thatthe Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Operating expenditures consist of routine expenditures for transmission distribution, generation and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.

316


In April 2017, Nevada Power purchasedSolar generation includes a growth project consisting of a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the remaining 25% interestend of 2023.
Electric battery storage includes two growth projects consisting of a 100-MW battery energy storage system co-located with a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the Silverhawk natural gas-fueled generating facility for $77 million.end of 2023. The Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN") approvedsecond project is a 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the purchasesite of the facilityretired Reid Gardner generating station in Nevada Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan filing in December 2015. The purchase price was allocatedClark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2023.
Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of turbine upgrades at several generating facilities, routine expenditures for generation, other operating projects and other infrastructure needed to the assets acquired, consisting primarily of generation utility plant,serve existing and no significant liabilities were assumed.expected demand.


Contractual Obligations

Material Cash Requirements

Nevada Power has contractual cash obligationsrequirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition. The following table summarizes Nevada Power's material contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2017 (in millions):
  Payments Due by Periods
  2018 2019 - 2020 2021 - 2022 2023 and Thereafter Total
           
Long-term debt $823
 $500
 $
 $1,309
 $2,632
Interest payments on long-term debt(1)
 155
 171
 154
 1,195
 1,675
Capital leases, including interest(2),(3)
 14
 27
 33
 28
 102
ON Line financial lease, including interest(2)
 44
 88
 88
 728
 948
Fuel and capacity contract commitments(1)
 591
 827
 758
 5,208
 7,384
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)(1)
 
 37
 49
 421
 507
Operating leases and easements(1)
 7
 15
 15
 54
 91
Asset retirement obligations 4
 10
 14
 63
 91
Maintenance, service and other contracts(1)
 46
 87
 76
 40
 249
Total contractual cash obligations $1,684
 $1,762
 $1,187
 $9,046
 $13,679

(1)Not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)Interest is not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(3)Includes fuel and capacity contracts designated as a capital lease.

Nevada Power has other types of commitmentscondition that arise primarily from unused lines of credit, letters of credit or relatelong- and short-term debt (refer to Notes 7 and 8), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 5), purchased electricity contracts (refer to Note 14), fuel contracts (refer to Note 14), construction and other development costs (Liquidity(refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7 and Note 6), uncertain tax positions (Note 10)14) and asset retirement obligations (Note 13), which have not been included in the above table because the amount and timing of the cash payments are not certain.AROs (refer to Note 11). Refer where applicable, to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.


Nevada Power has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $2.4 billion on long-term debt, including $152 million due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters


Nevada Power is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussioninformation regarding Nevada Power's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.


Environmental Laws and Regulations


Nevada Power is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, RPS,climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact Nevada Power's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. Nevada Power believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and Nevada Power is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results. Refer to "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for discussion of Nevada Power's forecasted environmental-related capital expenditures.


Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for additional informationfurther discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for Nevada Power's forecasted environmental-related capital expenditures.regulations.



Collateral and Contingent Features


Debt of Nevada Power is rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of Nevada Power's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.


Nevada Power has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. Nevada Power's secured revolving credit facility does not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon its availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facility are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.


317


In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the applicable credit ratings obtained from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2017,2022, Nevada Power would have been required to post $20$51 million of additional collateral. Nevada Power's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors. Refer to Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a discussion of Nevada Power's collateral requirements specific to Nevada Power's derivative contracts.


Inflation


Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where Nevada Power operates has not had a significant impact on Nevada Power's consolidated financial results. Nevada Power operates under a cost-of-service based raterate-setting structure administered by the PUCN and the FERC. Under this raterate-setting structure, Nevada Power is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation after Nevada Power experiences cost increases. Fuel and purchase power costs are recovered through a balancing account, minimizing the impact of inflation related to these costs. Nevada Power attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of periodic rate adjustments for fuel and energy costs, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.


New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting Nevada Power, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates


Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by Nevada Power's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with Nevada Power's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Nevada Power's Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


Nevada Power prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Nevada Power defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.


Nevada Power continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Nevada Power's ability to recover its costs. Nevada Power believes theits application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $1.0$1.3 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2017.2022. Refer to Nevada Power's Note 56 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's regulatory assets and liabilities.


Derivatives
318



Nevada Power is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Nevada Power is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Nevada Power's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Nevada Power's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances.

Nevada Power has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, monitor and report each of the various types of risk involved in its business. Nevada Power employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and interest rate risk. Nevada Power manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed‑rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, Nevada Power may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate Nevada Power's exposure to interest rate risk. Nevada Power does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. Refer to Nevada Power's Note 8 and 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's derivative contracts.

Measurement Principles

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Nevada Power transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, Nevada Power uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent Nevada Power's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. Interest rate swaps are valued using a financial model which utilizes observable inputs for similar instruments based primarily on market price curves.

Nevada Power bases its forward price curves upon internally developed models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations for electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to markets that are not active. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, Nevada Power uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contracts is a function of underlying forward commodity prices, interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of contracts. The model incorporates a mid-market pricing convention (the mid‑point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient for valuing its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value. The determination of the fair value for derivative contracts not only includes counterparty risk, but also the impact of Nevada Power's nonperformance risk on its liabilities, which as of December 31, 2017, had an immaterial impact to the fair value of its derivative contracts. As such, Nevada Power considers its derivative contracts to be valued using Level 3 inputs. The assumptions used in these models are critical because any changes in assumptions could have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of the contracts. As of December 31, 2017, Nevada Power had a net derivative liability of $3 million related to contracts where Nevada Power uses internal models with significant unobservable inputs.


Classification and Recognition Methodology

Nevada Power's commodity derivative contracts are probable of inclusion in regulated rates, and changes in the estimated fair value of derivative contracts are recorded as regulatory assets. Accordingly, amounts are generally not recognized in earnings until the contracts are settled and the amounts are reflected in regulated rates. As of December 31, 2017, Nevada Power had $3 million recorded as a regulatory asset related to derivative contracts on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


Nevada Power evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, as of December 31, 2017, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.


The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the asset that are used in thepurposes of impairment analysis, requires judgment regarding what Nevada Power would expect to recover from the future useexercise of the asset. Changes in judgmentjudgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of the fair value or the recoverable amount of thean asset may result frominclude significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, or the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect Nevada Power's results of operations.


Income Taxes


In determining Nevada Power's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by Nevada Power's various regulatory jurisdictions.commissions. Nevada Power's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Nevada Power recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Nevada Power's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, Nevada Power believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations if any, is not expected to have a material impact on Nevada Power's consolidated financial results. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to Nevada Power's Note 109 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's income taxes.


It is probable that Nevada Power is probable towill pass income tax benefitsbenefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property‑property related basis differences and other various differences on to its customers. As of December 31, 2017,2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $670$560 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.


Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue


Revenue is recognized as electricity is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since their last billing is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $111$143 million as of December 31, 2017.2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month when actual revenue is recorded.



Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. Nevada Power's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which Nevada Power transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with Nevada Power's business activities. Nevada Power has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to NotesNote 2 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's contracts accounted for as derivatives.


319


Commodity Price Risk


Nevada Power is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Nevada Power is principally exposed to electricity and natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Nevada Power's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Nevada Power's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power does not engage in proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Nevada Power uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Nevada Power does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. Nevada Power's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates through its deferred energy mechanism, which is subject to disallowance and regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.


The table that follows summarizes Nevada Power's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worstworse case scenarios (dollars in millions).


Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(52)$(23)$(81)
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(113)$(93)$(133)
 Fair Value - Estimated Fair Value after
  Net Hypothetical Change in Price
 Liability 10% increase 10% decrease
As of December 31, 2017:     
Commodity derivative contracts$(3) $(3) $(3)
      
As of December 31, 2016:     
Commodity derivative contracts$(14) $(15) $(13)


Nevada Power's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts are recoverable from customers in regulated rates and therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose Nevada Power to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, a net regulatory asset of $3$52 million and $14$113 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $3$52 million and $14$113 million, respectively. The settled cost of these commodity derivative contracts is generally included in regulated rates.



Interest Rate Risk


Nevada Power is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, Nevada Power's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose Nevada Power to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Nevada Power were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of Nevada Power's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 67 and 78 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of Nevada Power's short- and long-term debt.


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, Nevada Power had no short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $300 million and $180 million, respectively, that expose Nevada Power to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on Nevada Power's consolidated annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.

320



Credit Risk


Nevada Power is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Nevada Power's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Nevada Power analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Nevada Power enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Nevada Power exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

As of December 31, 2017,2022, Nevada Power's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions were not material, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral.



321


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data




322


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Shareholder and Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Nevada Power Company
Las Vegas, Nevada


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nevada Power Company and subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nevada Power as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Basis for Opinion


These financial statements are the responsibility of Nevada Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Nevada Power’sPower's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Nevada Power in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Nevada Power is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Nevada Power's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Nevada Power is subject to rate regulation by a state public service commission as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where Nevada Power operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

323


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow Nevada Power an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While Nevada Power Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit Nevada Power's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated Nevada Power's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected Nevada Power's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.


/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 23, 201824, 2023

We have served as Nevada Power’sPower's auditor since 1987.



324


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions, except share data)

As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$43 $33 
Trade receivables, net388 227 
Note receivable from affiliate100 — 
Inventories93 64 
Regulatory assets666 291 
Other current assets89 86 
Total current assets1,379 701 
Property, plant and equipment, net7,406 6,891 
Regulatory assets628 728 
Other assets388 432 
Total assets$9,801 $8,752 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$422 $242 
Accrued interest40 32 
Accrued property, income and other taxes32 29 
Short-term debt— 180 
Regulatory liabilities45 49 
Customer deposits51 44 
Derivative contracts51 55 
Other current liabilities49 62 
Total current liabilities690 693 
Long-term debt3,195 2,499 
Finance lease obligations295 310 
Regulatory liabilities1,093 1,100 
Deferred income taxes875 782 
Other long-term liabilities299 338 
Total liabilities6,447 5,722 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholder's equity:
Common stock - $1.00 stated value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital2,333 2,308 
Retained earnings1,022 724 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(1)(2)
Total shareholder's equity3,354 3,030 
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$9,801 $8,752 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
325
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS
    
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$57
 $279
Accounts receivable, net238
 243
Inventories59
 73
Regulatory assets28
 20
Other current assets44
 38
Total current assets426
 653
    
Property, plant and equipment, net6,877
 6,997
Regulatory assets941
 1,000
Other assets35
 39
    
Total assets$8,279
 $8,689
    
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$156
 $187
Accrued interest50
 50
Accrued property, income and other taxes63
 93
Regulatory liabilities91
 37
Current portion of long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations842
 17
Customer deposits73
 78
Other current liabilities16
 39
Total current liabilities1,291
 501
    
Long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations2,233
 3,049
Regulatory liabilities1,030
 416
Deferred income taxes767
 1,474
Other long-term liabilities280
 277
Total liabilities5,601
 5,717
    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)   
    
Shareholder's equity:   
Common stock - $1.00 stated value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding
 
Other paid-in capital2,308
 2,308
Retained earnings374
 667
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(4) (3)
Total shareholder's equity2,678
 2,972
    
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$8,279
 $8,689
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.




NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue$2,630 $2,139 $1,998 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy1,427 939 816 
Operations and maintenance303 301 299 
Depreciation and amortization417 406 361 
Property and other taxes53 48 47 
Total operating expenses2,200 1,694 1,523 
Operating income430 445 475 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(165)(153)(162)
Capitalized interest
Allowance for equity funds11 
Interest and dividend income47 20 10 
Other, net18 
Total other income (expense)(96)(105)(133)
Income before income tax expense334 340 342 
Income tax expense36 37 47 
Net income$298 $303 $295 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

326
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Operating revenue$2,206
 $2,083
 $2,402
      
Operating costs and expenses:     
Cost of fuel, energy and capacity902
 768
 1,084
Operations and maintenance393
 394
 372
Depreciation and amortization308
 303
 297
Property and other taxes40
 38
 36
Total operating costs and expenses1,643
 1,503
 1,789
      
Operating income563
 580
 613
      
Other income (expense):     
Interest expense(179) (185) (190)
Allowance for borrowed funds
1
 4
 3
Allowance for equity funds1
 2
 4
Other, net25
 24
 20
Total other income (expense)(152) (155) (163)
      
Income before income tax expense411
 425
 450
Income tax expense156
 146
 162
Net income$255
 $279
 $288
      
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions, except shares)

Accumulated
OtherOtherTotal
Common StockPaid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholder's
SharesAmountCapitalEarningsLoss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 20191,000 $— $2,308 $493 $(4)$2,797 
Net income— — — 295 — 295 
Dividends declared— — — (155)— (155)
Other equity transactions— — — 
Balance, December 31, 20201,000 — 2,308 634 (3)2,939 
Net income— — — 303 — 303 
Dividends declared— — — (213)— (213)
Other equity transactions— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20211,000 — 2,308 724 (2)3,030 
Net income— — — 298 — 298 
Contributions— — 25 — — 25 
Other equity transactions— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20221,000 $— $2,333 $1,022 $(1)$3,354 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

327
          Accumulated  
      Other   Other Total
  Common Stock Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Shareholder's
  Shares Amount Capital Earnings Loss, Net Equity
Balance, December 31, 2014 1,000
 $
 $2,308
 $583
 $(3) $2,888
Net income 
 
 
 288
 
 288
Dividends declared 
 
 
 (13) 
 (13)
Balance, December 31, 2015 1,000
 
 2,308
 858
 (3) 3,163
Net income 
 
 
 279
 
 279
Dividends declared 
 
 
 (469) 
 (469)
Other equity transactions

 
 
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Balance, December 31, 2016 1,000
 
 2,308
 667
 (3) 2,972
Net income 
 
 
 255
 
 255
Dividends declared 
 
 
 (548) 
 (548)
Other equity transactions

 
 
 
 
 (1) (1)
Balance, December 31, 2017 1,000
 $
 $2,308
 $374
 $(4) $2,678
             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$298 $303 $295 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization417 406 361 
Allowance for equity funds(11)(7)(7)
Deferred energy(541)(245)(44)
Amortization of deferred energy160 11 (41)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(15)(19)(42)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits49 — (10)
Other, net— 
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(178)45 
Inventories(29)(7)
Accrued property, income and other taxes21 (18)
Accounts payable and other liabilities176 63 (90)
Net cash flows from operating activities355 505 467 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(762)(449)(455)
Proceeds from sale of assets— — 26 
Issuance of affiliate note receivable(100)— — 
Other, net— — 
Net cash flows from investing activities(862)(447)(429)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt694 — 718 
Repayments of long-term debt— — (575)
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt(180)180 — 
Dividends paid— (213)(155)
Contributions from parent25 — — 
Other, net(17)(16)(15)
Net cash flows from financing activities522 (49)(27)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents15 11 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period45 36 25 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$60 $45 $36 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

328
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$255
 $279
 $288
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:     
(Gain) loss on nonrecurring items(1) 1
 (3)
Depreciation and amortization308
 303
 297
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits94
 78
 162
Allowance for equity funds(1) (2) (4)
Changes in regulatory assets and liabilities50
 131
 4
Deferred energy(16) (21) 176
Amortization of deferred energy16
 (107) 36
Other, net(3) 
 13
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable and other assets8
 26
 (40)
Inventories6
 7
 9
Accrued property, income and other taxes(26) 63
 
Accounts payable and other liabilities(23) 13
 (46)
Net cash flows from operating activities667
 771
 892
      
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Capital expenditures(270) (335) (320)
Acquisitions(77) 
 
Proceeds from sale of assets4
 
 9
Other, net
 
 10
Net cash flows from investing activities(343) (335) (301)
      
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt91
 
 
Repayments of long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations(89) (224) (262)
Dividends paid(548) (469) (13)
Net cash flows from financing activities(546) (693) (275)
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(222) (257) 316
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period279
 536
 220
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$57
 $279
 $536
      
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(1)    Organization and Operations


Nevada Power Company together withand its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power"), is a wholly owned subsidiary of NV Energy, Inc. ("NV Energy"), a holding company that also owns Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific") and certain other subsidiaries. Nevada Power is a United StatesU.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial and industrial customers primarily in the Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson and adjoining areas. NV Energy is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"). BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").


(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Consolidation and Presentation


The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Nevada Power and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015. Certain amounts in the prior period Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications did not impact previously reported operating income, net income or retained earnings.2020.


Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements


The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


Nevada Power prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Nevada Power defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

Nevada Power continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Nevada Power's ability to recover its costs. Nevada Power believes the application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").



Fair Value Measurements


As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered inwhen determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.


329


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Investments


Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, United StatesU.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted amounts are includedcash and cash equivalents consist of funds restricted by the PUCN for a certain renewable energy contract. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, as presented in other assetsthe Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and other current assetsdisaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets (in millions):

As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$43 $33 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents included in other current assets17 12 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$60 $45 

Allowance for Doubtful AccountsCredit Losses


Accounts receivableTrade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts.credit losses. The allowance for doubtful accountscredit losses is based on Nevada Power's assessment of the collectibilitycollectability of amounts owed to Nevada Power by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, Nevada Power primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, Nevada Power may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. Nevada Power also has the ability to assess deposits on customers who have delayed payments or who are deemed to be a credit risk. The changechanges in the balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts,credit losses, which is included in accounts receivable,trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

2017 2016 2015202220212020
Beginning balance$12
 $13
 $14
Beginning balance$18 $19 $15 
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net15
 16
 16
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net14 13 13 
Write-offs, net(11) (17) (17)Write-offs, net(12)(14)(9)
Ending balance$16
 $12
 $13
Ending balance$20 $18 $19 


Derivatives


Nevada Power employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.


Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked‑to‑market and settled amounts are recognized as cost of fuel, energy and capacity on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


For Nevada Power's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.



330


Inventories


Inventories consist mainly of materials and supplies totaling $56$93 million and $60$64 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively, and fuel, which includes coal stock, stored natural gas and fuel oil, totaling $3 million and $13 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2021. The cost is determined using the average cost method. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and are expensed or capitalized to construction work in process, as appropriate, when used. Fuel costs are recovered from retail customers through the base tariff energy rates and deferred energy accounting adjustment charges approved by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN").


Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


General


Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Nevada Power capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. The cost of repairs and minor replacements are charged to expense when incurred with the exception of costs for generation plant maintenance under certain long-term service agreements. Costs under these agreements are expensed straight-line over the term of the agreements as approved by the PUCN.Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN").


Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by Nevada Power's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by Nevada Power to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as a non-current regulatory liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.


Generally when Nevada Power retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated using the composite method, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings with the exception of material gains or losses on regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated on a straight-line basis, which is then recorded to a regulatory asset or liability.


Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, are capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The rate applied to construction costs is the lower of the PUCN allowed rate of return and rates computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, Nevada Power is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets. Nevada Power's AFUDC rate used during 20172022 and 20162021 was 8.09%.6.55% and 7.14%, respectively.


Asset Retirement Obligations


Nevada Power recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. Nevada Power's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The costs are not recovered in rates until the work has been completed.



331


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


Nevada Power evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, as of December 31, 2017, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.


Leases

Nevada Power has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for land, generating facilities, vehicles and office equipment and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities, office space and vehicles. These leases generally require Nevada Power to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Nevada Power does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating Nevada Power is reasonably certain to exercise the option. Nevada Power's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

Nevada Power's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

Nevada Power's operating and right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

Nevada Power uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which Nevada Power expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Nevada Power records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Substantially all of Nevada Power's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission and distribution and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of amounts not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 842, "Leases."

Revenue recognized is equal to what Nevada Power has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Nevada Power's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $143 million and $107 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued. In addition, Nevada Power has recognized contract assets of $4 million and $6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, due to Nevada Power's performance on certain contracts.
332



Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and financing costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes


Berkshire Hathaway includes Nevada Power in its consolidated United StatesU.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, Nevada Power's provision for income taxes has been computed on a separate return basis.


Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using estimatedenacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with components of other comprehensive income ("OCI") are charged or credited directly to OCI. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("2017 Tax Reform") was signed into law which, among other items, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with income tax benefits and expense for the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, certain property‑related basis differences and other various differences that Nevada Power deems probable to be passed on to its customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are generally deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.


In determining Nevada Power's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by Nevada Power's various regulatory jurisdictions. Nevada Power's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Nevada Power recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Nevada Power's federal, state and local incomeunrecognized tax examinations is uncertain, Nevada Power believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income taxbenefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities that may result from these examinations, if any, is not expected to have a material impact on Nevada Power's consolidated financial results.the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized as electricity is delivered or services are provided. Revenue recognized includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, unbilled revenue was $111 million and $91 million, respectively, and is included in accounts receivable, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Rates are established by regulators or contractual arrangements. When preliminary rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued. Nevada Power records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Nevada Power primarily buys energy and natural gas to satisfy its customer load requirements. Due to changes in retail customer load requirements, Nevada Power may not take physical delivery of the energy or natural gas. Nevada Power may sell the excess energy or natural gas to the wholesale market. In such instances, it is Nevada Power's policy to record such sales net in cost of fuel, energy and capacity.


Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and financing costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing on a straight-line basis.


Segment Information


Nevada Power currently has one segment, which includes its regulated electric utility operations.


New Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-07, which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 715, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits." The amendments in this guidance require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statement of operations separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of operating income. Additionally, the guidance only allows the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. This guidance must be adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of operations and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component in the balance sheet. Nevada Power adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, which amends FASB ASC Subtopic 230-10, "Statement of Cash Flows - Overall." The amendments in this guidance require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. Nevada Power adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, which amends FASB ASC Topic 230, "Statement of Cash Flows." The amendments in this guidance address the classification of eight specific cash flow issues within the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. Nevada Power adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, which creates FASB ASC Topic 842, "Leases" and supersedes Topic 840 "Leases." This guidance increases transparency and comparability among entities by recording lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. A lessee should recognize in the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-01 that provides for an optional transition practical expedient allowing companies to not have to evaluate existing land easements if they were not previously accounted for under ASC Topic 840, "Leases." This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. Nevada Power plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2019 and is currently evaluating the impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which creates FASB ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and supersedes ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition." The guidance replaces industry-specific guidance and establishes a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, the guidance requires the entity to disclose further quantitative and qualitative information regarding the nature and amount of revenues arising from contracts with customers, as well as other information about the significant judgments and estimates used in recognizing revenues from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 one year to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued several ASUs that clarify the implementation guidance for ASU No. 2014-09 but do not change the core principle of the guidance. This guidance may be adopted retrospectively or under a modified retrospective method where the cumulative effect is recognized at the date of initial application. Nevada Power adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method and the adoption will not have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements but will increase the disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The timing and amount of revenue recognized after adoption of the new guidance will not be different than before as a majority of revenue is recognized when Nevada Power has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Nevada Power's performance to date. Nevada Power's current plan is to quantitatively disaggregate revenue in the required financial statement footnote by customer class.

(3)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility plant:
Generation30 - 55 years$3,977 $3,793 
Transmission45 - 70 years1,562 1,503 
Distribution20 - 65 years4,134 3,920 
General and intangible plant5 - 65 years871 836 
Utility plant10,544 10,052 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(3,624)(3,406)
Utility plant, net6,920 6,646 
Nonregulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization45 years
6,921 6,647 
Construction work-in-progress485 244 
Property, plant and equipment, net$7,406 $6,891 

333

 Depreciable Life 2017 2016
Utility plant:     
Generation30 - 55 years $3,707
 $4,271
Distribution20 - 65 years 3,314
 3,231
Transmission45 - 65 years 1,860
 1,846
General and intangible plant5 - 65 years 793
 738
Utility plant  9,674
 10,086
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (2,871) (3,205)
Utility plant, net  6,803
 6,881
Other non-regulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization45 years 1
 2
Plant, net  6,804
 6,883
Construction work-in-progress  73
 114
Property, plant and equipment, net  $6,877
 $6,997


Almost all of Nevada Power's plant is subject to the ratemaking jurisdiction of the PUCN and the FERC. Nevada Power's depreciation and amortization expense, as authorized by the PUCN, stated as a percentage of the depreciable property balances as of December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 was 3.1%, 3.2%, 3.2% and 3.0%3.1%, respectively. Nevada Power is required to file a utility plant depreciation study every six years as a companion filing with the triennial general rate casereview filings. The most recent study was filed in 2017.


Construction work-in-progress is primarily related to the construction of regulated assets.


During 2017, Nevada Power performed a depreciation study, in which the depreciation rates will be implemented in January 2018. The study results in shorter estimated useful lives at the Navajo Generating Station and longer average service lives for various other utility plant groups. The net effect of these changes, based on the study, will increase depreciation and amortization expense by $7 million annually based on depreciable plant balances at the time of the change.

Acquisitions

In April 2017, Nevada Power purchased the remaining 25% interest in the Silverhawk natural gas-fueled generating facility for $77 million. The Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN") approved the purchase of the facility in Nevada Power's triennial Integrated Resource Plan filing in December 2015. The purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired, consisting primarily of generation utility plant, and no significant liabilities were assumed.


(4)    Jointly Owned Utility Facilities


Under joint facility ownership agreements, Nevada Power, as tenants in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation and transmission facilities. Nevada Power accounts for its proportionate share of each facility and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include Nevada Power's share of the expenses of these facilities.


The amounts shown in the table below represent Nevada Power's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 20172022 (dollars in millions):

NevadaConstruction
Power'sUtilityAccumulatedWork-in-
SharePlantDepreciationProgress
Navajo Generating Station(1)
11 %$$$— 
ON Line Transmission Line19 121 26 
Other transmission facilitiesVarious56 27 — 
Total$178 $57 $

(1)Represents Nevada Power's proportionate share of capitalized asset retirement costs to retire the Navajo Generating Station, which was shut down in November 2019.

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$$10 
Finance leases303 326 
Total right-of-use assets$312 $336 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$11 $13 
Finance leases313 336 
Total lease liabilities$324 $349 

334


 Nevada     Construction
 Power's Utility Accumulated Work-in-
 Share Plant Depreciation Progress
        
Navajo Generating Station11% $220
 $152
 $
ON Line Transmission Line24
 146
 16
 
Other transmission facilitiesVarious
 48
 26
 
Total  $414
 $194
 $
The following table summarizes Nevada Power's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Variable$369 $449 $434 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization14 13 12 
Interest27 28 29 
Total lease costs$412 $492 $478 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases4.85.76.5
Finance leases29.128.728.7
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases4.5 %4.5 %4.5 %
Finance leases8.6 %8.6 %8.6 %

(5)The following table summarizes Nevada Power's supplemental cash flow information relating to leases for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(3)$(3)$(3)
Operating cash flows from finance leases(28)(29)(34)
Financing cash flows from finance leases(17)(16)(15)
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases$— $— $
Finance leases

335


Nevada Power has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$44 $46 
202444 47 
202543 46 
202644 47 
202742 44 
Thereafter— 414 414 
Total undiscounted lease payments13 631 644 
Less - amounts representing interest(2)(318)(320)
Lease liabilities$11 $313 $324 

Operating and Finance Lease Obligations

Nevada Power's lease obligation primarily consists of a transmission line, One Nevada Transmission Line ("ON Line"), which was placed in-service on December 31, 2013. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, collectively the ("Nevada Utilities"), entered into a long-term transmission use agreement, in which the Nevada Utilities have a 25% interest and Great Basin Transmission South, LLC has a 75% interest. The Nevada Utilities' share of the long-term transmission use agreement and ownership interest is split at 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, previously split 95% for Nevada Power and 5% for Sierra Pacific. In December 2019, the PUCN ordered the Nevada Utilities to complete the necessary procedures to change the ownership split to 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, effective January 1, 2020. In August 2020, the FERC approved the amended agreement between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC that reallocated the PUCN-approved ownership percentage change from Nevada Power to Sierra Pacific. The term of the lease is 41 years with the agreement ending December 31, 2054. Total ON Line finance lease obligations of $276 million and $286 million were included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 2 for further discussion of Nevada Power's other lease obligations.

(6)    Regulatory Matters


Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. Nevada Power's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred energy costs1 year654 273 
Decommissioning costs3 years116 169 
Merger costs from 1999 merger22 years105 110 
Unrealized loss on regulated derivative contracts1 year75 117 
Asset retirement obligations5 years69 73 
Deferred operating costs13 years67 93 
OtherVarious208 184 
Total regulatory assets$1,294 $1,019 
Reflected as:
Current assets$666 $291 
Noncurrent assets628 728 
Total regulatory assets$1,294 $1,019 

336

 Weighted    
 Average    
 Remaining Life 2017 2016
      
Decommissioning costs6 years $231
 $114
Deferred operating costs12 years 169
 127
Merger costs from 1999 merger27 years 130
 136
Employee benefit plans(1)
8 years 89
 105
Asset retirement obligations7 years 72
 74
Abandoned projects3 years 58
 75
Legacy meters15 years 56
 60
ON Line deferrals36 years 47
 44
Deferred energy costs2 years 46
 46
Deferred income taxes(2)

N/A 
 141
OtherVarious 71
 98
Total regulatory assets  $969
 $1,020
      
Reflected as:     
Current assets  $28
 $20
Other assets  941
 1,000
Total regulatory assets  $969
 $1,020


(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.
(2)Amounts primarily represent income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.


Nevada Power had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $363$320 million and $560$371 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The regulatory assets not earning a return on investment primarily consist of merger costs from the 1999 merger, asset retirement obligations,AROs, deferred operating costs, a portion of the employee benefit plans, losses on reacquired debt and deferred energy costs.

Regulatory assets not earning a return as of December 31, 2016 also included deferred income taxes.Liabilities


Regulatory liabilities represent amounts that are expected to be returned to customers in future periods. Nevada Power's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred income taxes(1)
Various$560 $603 
Cost of removal(2)
31 years358 348 
Earning sharing mechanism4 years114 73 
OtherVarious106 125 
Total regulatory liabilities$1,138 $1,149 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$45 $49 
Noncurrent liabilities1,093 1,100 
Total regulatory liabilities$1,138 $1,149 
 Weighted    
 Average    
 Remaining Life 2017 2016
      
Deferred income taxes(1)
33 years $670
 $9
Cost of removal(2)
31 years 307
 294
Impact fees6 years 89
 90
Energy efficiency program

1 year 27
 37
OtherVarious 28
 23
Total regulatory liabilities  $1,121
 $453
      
Reflected as:     
Current liabilities  $91
 $37
Other long-term liabilities  1,030
 416
Total regulatory liabilities  $1,121
 $453


(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. See Note 10 for further discussion of 2017 Tax Reform impacts.

(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices.
(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.


Deferred Energy


Nevada statutes permit regulated utilities to adopt deferred energy accounting procedures. The intent of these procedures is to ease the effect on customers of fluctuations in the cost of purchased natural gas, fuel and electricity and are subject to annual prudency review by the PUCN. Under deferred energy accounting, to the extent actual fuel and purchased power costs exceed fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates that excess is not recorded as a current expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations but rather is deferred and recorded as a regulatory asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and would be included in the table above as deferred energy costs. Conversely, a regulatory liability is recorded to the extent fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates exceed actual fuel and purchased power costs and is included in the table above as deferred energy costs. These excess amounts are reflected in quarterly adjustments to rates and recorded as cost of fuel, energy and capacity in future time periods.


Regulatory Rate Review

337
In June 2017, Nevada Power filed an electric regulatory rate review with the PUCN.


(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

The filing supported an annual revenue increase of $29 million, or 2%, but requested no incremental annual revenue relief. In December 2017, the PUCN issued an order which reducedfollowing table summarizes Nevada Power's revenue requirement by $26 million and requires Nevada Power to share 50% of revenues related to equity returns above 9.7%. As a result of the order, Nevada Power recorded expense of $28 million primarily due to the reduction of a regulatory asset to return to customers revenue collected for costs not incurred. In January 2018, Nevada Power filed a petition for clarification of certain findings and directives in the order. The new rates were effective in February 2018.


Energy Efficiency Program Rates ("EEPR") and Energy Efficiency Implementation Rates ("EEIR")

EEPR was established to allow Nevada Power to recover the costs of implementing energy efficiency programs and EEIR was established to offset the negative impacts on revenue associated with the successful implementation of energy efficiency programs. These rates change once a year in the utility's annual DEAA application based on energy efficiency program budgets prepared by Nevada Power and approved by the PUCN in integrated resource plan proceedings. To the extent Nevada Power's earned rate of return exceeds the rate of return used to set base general rates, Nevada Power is required to refund to customers EEIR revenue previously collected for that year. In March 2017, Nevada Power filed an application to reset the EEIR and EEPR and refund the EEIR revenue received in 2016, including carrying charges. In September 2017, the PUCN issued an order accepting a stipulation requiring Nevada Power to refund the 2016 revenue and reset the rates as filed effective October 1, 2017. The EEIR liability for Nevada Power is $10 million, which is included in current regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheetsavailability under its credit facilities as of December 31 2017 and 2016.(in millions):


Chapter 704B Applications
20222021
Credit facilities$400 $400 
Short-term debt— (180)
Net credit facilities$400 $220 


Chapter 704B of the Nevada Revised Statutes allows retail electric customers with an average annual load of one megawatt ("MW") or more to file with the PUCN an application to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become distribution only service customers. On a case-by-case basis, the PUCN will assess the application and may deny or grant the application subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee, paying on-going charges and receiving approval for specific alternative energy providers and terms. The impact fee and on-going charges are assessed to alleviate the burden on other Nevada customers for the applicant's share of previously committed investments and long-term renewable contracts and are set at a level designed such that the remaining customers are not subjected to increased costs.

In May 2015, MGM Resorts International ("MGM") and Wynn Las Vegas, LLC ("Wynn"), filed applications with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become distribution only service customers of Nevada
Power. In December 2015, the PUCN granted the applications subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee, on-going charges and receiving approval for specific alternative energy providers and terms. In December 2015, the applicants filed petitions for reconsideration. In January 2016, the PUCN granted reconsideration and updated some of the terms, including removing a limitation related to energy purchased indirectly from NV Energy. In September 2016, MGM and Wynn paid impact fees of $82 million and $15 million, respectively. In October 2016, MGM and Wynn became distribution only service customers and started procuring energy from another energy supplier. In April 2017, Wynn filed a motion with the PUCN seeking relief from the January 2016 order and requested the PUCN adopt an alternative impact fee and revise on-going charges associated with retirement of assets and high cost renewable contracts. This request is still pending. In May 2017, a stipulation reached between MGM, Regulatory Operations Staff and the Bureau of Consumer Protection was filed requiring Nevada Power to reduce the original $82 million impact fee by $16 million and apply the credit against MGM's remaining on-going charge obligation. In June 2017, the PUCN approved the stipulation as filed.

In September 2016, Switch, Ltd. ("Switch"), a customer of Nevada Power, filed an application with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become a distribution only service customer of Nevada Power. In December 2016, the PUCN approved a stipulation agreement that allows Switch to purchase energy from alternative providers subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee to Nevada Power. In May 2017, Switch paid impact fees of $27 million and, in June 2017, Switch became a distribution only service customer and started procuring energy from another energy supplier.

In November 2016, Caesars Enterprise Service ("Caesars"), a customer of Nevada Power, filed an application with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become a distribution only service customer of Nevada
Power. In March 2017, the PUCN approved the application allowing Caesars to purchase energy from alternative providers subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee. In March 2017, Caesars provided notice that it intends to pay the impact fee monthly for six years and proceed with purchasing energy from alternative providers. In July 2017, Caesars made the required compliance filings and, in September 2017, the PUCN issued an order allowing Caesars to acquire electric energy and ancillary services from another energy supplier and become a distribution only service customer of Nevada Power. In December 2017, Caesars provided notice that it intends to transition eligible meters in the Nevada Power service territory to unbundled electric service in February 2018 at the earliest.

Emissions Reduction and Capacity Retirement Plan ("ERCR Plan")

In March 2017, Nevada Power retired Reid Gardner Unit 4, a 257-MW coal-fueled generating facility. The early retirement was approved by the PUCN in December 2016 as a part of Nevada Power's second amendment to the ERCR Plan. The remaining net book value of $151 million was moved from property, plant and equipment, net to noncurrent regulatory assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet in March 2017, in compliance with the ERCR Plan. Refer to Note 14 for additional information on the ERCR Plan.

(6)Credit Facility

Nevada Power has a $400 million secured credit facility expiring in June 20202025 with two one-yearan unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes and provide for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Eurodollar rateSecured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a spread that varies based on Nevada Power's credit ratings for its senior secured long‑term debt securities. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, Nevada Power had no borrowings of $— million and $180 million, respectively, outstanding under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding was —% and 0.86%, respectively. Amounts due under Nevada Power's credit facility are collateralized by Nevada Power's general and refunding mortgage bonds. The credit facility requires Nevada Power's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.



(7)    Long-TermAs of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power had $— million and $15 million, respectively, of a fully available letter of credit issued under committed arrangements in support of certain transactions required by a third party and has provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration date for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew the letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

(8)    Long-term Debt and Financial and Capital Lease Obligations


Nevada Power's long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
General and refunding mortgage securities:
3.700% Series CC, due 2029$500 $497 $497 
2.400% Series DD, due 2030425 422 422 
6.650% Series N, due 2036367 360 359 
6.750% Series R, due 2037349 346 346 
5.375% Series X, due 2040250 248 248 
5.450% Series Y, due 2041250 239 239 
3.125% Series EE, due 2050300 298 297 
5.900% Series GG, due 2053400 394 — 
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:
Fixed-rate series:
1.875% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017A, due 2032(1)
40 39 39 
1.650% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017, due 2036(1)
40 39 39 
1.650% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017B, due 2039(1)
13 13 13 
Variable-rate 4.821% Term Loan, due 2024(2)
300 300 — 
Total long-term debt$3,234 $3,195 $2,499 
Reflected as:
Total long-term debt$3,195 $2,499 

(1)Subject to mandatory purchase by Nevada Power in March 2023 at which date the interest rate may be adjusted.
(2)Amounts borrowed under the facility bear interest at variable rates based on SOFR or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a pricing margin.

338

 Par Value 2017 2016
General and refunding mortgage securities:     
6.500% Series O, due 2018$324
 $324
 $324
6.500% Series S, due 2018499
 499
 498
7.125% Series V, due 2019500
 499
 499
6.650% Series N, due 2036367
 357
 357
6.750% Series R, due 2037349
 346
 345
5.375% Series X, due 2040250
 247
 247
5.450% Series Y, due 2041250
 236
 236
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:     
Fixed-rate series:     
1.800% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017A, due 2032(1)
40
 40
 
1.600% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017, due 2036(1)
40
 39
 
1.600% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017B, due 2039(1)
13
 13
 
Variable-rate series - 1.890% to 1.928%     
Pollution Control Bonds Series 2006A, due 2032
 
 38
Pollution Control Bonds Series 2006, due 2036
 
 37
Capital and financial lease obligations - 2.750% to 11.600%, due through 2054475
 475
 485
Total long-term debt and financial and capital leases$3,107
 $3,075
 $3,066
      
Reflected as:     
Current portion of long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations  $842
 $17
Long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations  2,233
 3,049
Total long-term debt and financial and capital leases  $3,075
 $3,066


(1)Subject to mandatory purchase by Nevada Power in May 2020 at which date the interest rate may be adjusted from time to time.


Annual Payment on Long-Term Debt and Financial and Capital Leases


The annual repayments of long-term debt and capital and financial leases for the years beginning January 1, 20182023 and thereafter, are as follows (in millions):
2024$300 
2028 and thereafter2,934 
Total3,234 
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost(39)
Total$3,195 
  Long-term Capital and Financial  
  Debt Lease Obligations Total
       
2018 $823
 $75
 $898
2019 500
 76
 576
2020 
 76
 76
2021 
 80
 80
2022 
 75
 75
Thereafter 1,309
 760
 2,069
Total 2,632
 1,142
 3,774
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost
 (32) 
 (32)
Executory costs 
 (92) (92)
Amounts representing interest 
 (575) (575)
Total $2,600
 $475
 $3,075


The issuance of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities by Nevada Power is subject to PUCN approval and is limited by available property and other provisions of the mortgage indentures. As of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately $8.4$9.8 billion (based on original cost) of Nevada Power's property was subject to the liens of the mortgages.


Financial and Capital Lease Obligations

(9)    Income Taxes
In 1984, Nevada Power entered into a 30-year capital lease
Income tax expense consists of the following for the Pearson Building with five, five-year renewal options beginning in year 2015. In February 2010, Nevada Power amended this capital lease agreement to include the leaseyears ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current – Federal$(13)$37 $57 
Deferred – Federal49 — (10)
Total income tax expense$36 $37 $47 

A reconciliation of the adjoining parking lot andfederal statutory income tax rate to exercise threethe effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Effects of ratemaking(11)(11)(8)
Other
Effective income tax rate11 %11 %14 %

The net deferred income tax liability consists of the five-year renewal options beginning in year 2015. There remain two additional renewal options which could extend the lease an additional ten years. Capital assets of $24 million and $25 million were included in property, plant and equipment, netfollowing as of December 31 2017 and 2016, respectively.(in millions):
In 2007,
 20222021
Deferred income tax assets:  
Regulatory liabilities$186 $195 
Operating and finance leases68 73 
Customer advances27 25 
Unamortized contract value20 25 
Other
Total deferred income tax assets310 326 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property related items(821)(800)
Regulatory assets(273)(204)
Operating and finance leases(65)(70)
Other(26)(34)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(1,185)(1,108)
Net deferred income tax liability$(875)$(782)

339


The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of Nevada Power's income tax return through the short year ended December 31, 2013. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, may not preclude the U.S. Internal Revenue Service from adjusting the federal net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans

Nevada Power entered intois a 20-year lease, with three 10-year renewal options, to occupy landparticipant in benefit plans sponsored by NV Energy. The NV Energy Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan ("Qualified Pension Plan") and buildinga supplemental executive retirement plan and a restoration plan (collectively, "Non‑Qualified Pension Plans") that provide pension benefits for its Beltway Complex operations center in southern Nevada.eligible employees. The NV Energy Comprehensive Welfare Benefit and Cafeteria Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Plans") on behalf of Nevada Power. Nevada Power accountsdid not make any contributions to the Qualified Pension Plan for the building portionyears ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power contributed $1 million to the Non-Qualified Pension Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power did not make any contributions to the Other Postretirement Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Amounts attributable to Nevada Power were allocated from NV Energy based upon the current, or in the case of retirees, previous, employment location. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates. Net periodic benefit costs not included in regulated rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net.

Amounts receivable from (payable to) NV Energy are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of the lease as a capital lease and the land portion of the lease as an operating lease. Nevada Power transferred operations to the facilities in June 2009. Capital assets of $6 million and $7 million were included in property, plant and equipment, netfollowing as of December 31 2017 and 2016, respectively.(in millions):
20222021
Qualified Pension Plan -
Other non-current assets$27 $42 
Non-Qualified Pension Plans:
Other current liabilities(1)(1)
Other long-term liabilities(6)(8)
Other Postretirement Plans -
Other non-current assets

(11)    Asset Retirement Obligations

Nevada Power has long-term energy purchase contracts which qualify as capital leases. The leases were entered into between the years 1989 and 1990 and became commercially operable through 1993. The termsestimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the leasesamount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for 30 yearsinflation and expire betweenthen discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the years 2022-2023. Capitalamount and timing of the expected work.

Nevada Power does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of $34removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $358 million and $38$348 million were included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.

The following table presents Nevada Power has master leasing agreements of which various pieces of equipment qualify as capital leases. The remaining equipment is treated as operating leases. Lease terms average seven years under the master lease agreement. Capital assets of $3 million and $1 million were included in property, plant and equipment, netPower's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 2017(in millions):
20222021
Waste water remediation$31 $37 
Evaporative ponds and dry ash landfills14 13 
Solar-powered generating facilities
Other11 15 
Total asset retirement obligations$59 $68 

340


The following table reconciles the beginning and 2016, respectively.
ON Line was placed in-service onending balances of Nevada Power's ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 2013. The(in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$68 $72 
Change in estimated costs— 
Retirements(16)(6)
Accretion
Ending balance$59 $68 
Reflected as:
Other current liabilities$16 $19 
Other long-term liabilities43 49 
$59 $68 

In 2008, Nevada UtilitiesPower signed an administrative order of consent as owner and operator of Reid Gardner Generating Station Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and as co-owner and operating agent of Unit No. 4. Based on the administrative order of consent, Nevada Power recorded estimated AROs and capital remediation costs. However, actual costs of work under the administrative order of consent may vary significantly once the scope of work is defined and additional site characterization has been completed. In connection with the termination of the co-ownership arrangement, effective October 22, 2013, between Nevada Power and California Department of Water Resources ("CDWR") for the Reid Gardner Generating Station Unit No. 4, Nevada Power and CDWR entered into a long-term transmission usecost-sharing agreement that sets forth how the parties will jointly share in whichcosts associated with all investigation, characterization and, if necessary, remedial activities as required under the administrative order of consent.

Certain of Nevada Utilities have 25% interestPower's decommissioning and Great Basin Transmission South, LLC has 75% interest. Referreclamation obligations relate to Note 4 for additional information. Thejointly-owned facilities, and as such, Nevada Utilities'Power is committed to pay a proportionate share of the long-term transmission use agreement and ownership interest is split at 95%decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, the respective subsidiary may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. Management has identified legal obligations to retire generation plant assets specified in land leases for Nevada PowerPower's jointly-owned Navajo Generating Station, retired in November 2019, and 5% for Sierra Pacific. The term is for 41 years with the agreement ending December 31, 2054. Payments beganHiggins Generating Station. Provisions of the lease require the lessees to remove the facilities upon request of the lessors at the expiration of the leases. Nevada Power's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities in other long-term liabilities on January 31, 2014. ON Line assets of $396 million and $402 million were included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.the Consolidated Balance Sheets.



(8)    
(12)Risk Management and Hedging Activities


Nevada Power is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Nevada Power is principally exposed to electricity and natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Nevada Power's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Nevada Power's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power does not engage in proprietary trading activities.


Nevada Power has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage mitigate, monitor and report on each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Nevada Power uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Nevada Power manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed‑ratefixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, Nevada Power may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate Nevada Power's exposure to interest rate risk. Nevada Power does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.


There have been no significant changes in Nevada Power's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 913 for additional information on derivative contracts.


341


The following table, which excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases orand normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair value of Nevada Power's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts to the amounts presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

  Other Other  
  Current Long-term  
  Liabilities Liabilities Total
As of December 31, 2017:      
Commodity derivative liabilities(1)
 $(2) $(1) $(3)
       
As of December 31, 2016:      
Commodity derivative liabilities(1)
 $(7) $(7) $(14)
Derivative
OtherContracts -Other
CurrentCurrentLong-term
AssetsLiabilitiesLiabilitiesTotal
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts (1):
Commodity assets$23 $— $— $23 
Commodity liabilities— (51)(24)(75)
Total derivative - net basis$23 $(51)$(24)$(52)
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (55)(62)(117)
Total derivative - net basis$$(55)$(62)$(113)


(1)Nevada Power's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are included in regulated rates and as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, a regulatory asset of $3 million and $14 million, respectively, was recorded related to the derivative liability of $3 million and $14 million, respectively.

(1)Nevada Power's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are included in regulated rates. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a regulatory asset of $52 million and $113 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $52 million and $113 million, respectively.

Derivative Contract Volumes


The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity derivative contracts with indexed and fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
Unit of
Measure20222021
Electricity purchasesMegawatt hours
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms109 119 
  Unit of    
  Measure 2017 2016
Electricity sales Megawatt hours 
 (2)
Natural gas purchases Decatherms 125
 114



Credit Risk


Nevada Power is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Nevada Power's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Nevada Power analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishestablishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluateevaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Nevada Power enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Nevada Power exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.


342


Collateral and Contingent Features


In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These derivative contractsagreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security in the event ofif credit exposures on a credit rating downgrade ("credit-risk-relatednet basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels "credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," in the event ofassurance" if there is a material adverse change in Nevada Power's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2017,2022, Nevada Power's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.


The aggregate fair value of Nevada Power's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features was $1totaled $5 million and $2$6 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, which represents the amount of collateral to be posted if all credit risk related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered. Nevada Power's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation or other factors.


(9)
Fair Value Measurements

(13)    Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of Nevada Power's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. Nevada Power has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:


Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Nevada Power has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect Nevada Power's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. Nevada Power develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.



343


The following table presents Nevada Power's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $23 $23 
Money market mutual funds34 — — 34 
Investment funds— — 
$37 $— $23 $60 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(75)$(75)
As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds34 — — 34 
Investment funds— — 
$37 $— $$41 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(117)$(117)
 Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
As of December 31, 2017:       
Assets - investment funds$2
 $
 $
 $2
        
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$
 $
 $(3) $(3)
        
As of December 31, 2016:       
Assets:       
Money market mutual funds(1)
$220
 $
 $
 $220
Investment funds6
 
 
 6
 $226
 $
 $
 $226
        
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$
 $
 $(14) $(14)


Nevada Power's investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.
(1)Amounts are included in cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of these money market mutual funds approximates cost.


Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Nevada Power transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, Nevada Power uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent Nevada Power's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. Nevada Power bases its forward price curves upon internally developed models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to markets that are not active. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, Nevada Power uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The model incorporates a mid-market pricing convention (the mid‑point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient for valuing its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value. The determination of the fair value for derivative contracts not only includes counterparty risk, but also the impact of Nevada Power's nonperformance risk on its liabilities, which as of December 31, 2017,2022, had an immaterial impact to the fair value of its derivative contracts. As such, Nevada Power considers its derivative contracts to be valued using Level 3 inputs. Refer to Note 8 for further discussion regarding Nevada Power's risk management and hedging activities.


Nevada Power's investments in money market mutual funds and equity securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.


344


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Nevada Power's net commodity derivative assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$(113)$15 $(8)
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities(68)(90)(17)
Settlements129 (38)40 
Ending balance$(52)$(113)$15 
  2017 2016 2015
Beginning balance $(14) $(22) $(30)
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory assets (3) (4) 
Settlements 14
 12
 8
Ending balance $(3) $(14) $(22)



Nevada Power's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of Nevada Power's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The carrying value of Nevada Power's variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value because of the frequent repricing of these instruments at market rates. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Nevada Power's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$3,195 $3,114 $2,499 $3,067 

(14)    Commitments and Contingencies
 2017 2016
 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
 Value Value Value Value
        
Long-term debt$2,600
 $3,088
 $2,581
 $3,040


Commitments
(10)
Income Taxes


Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

The 2017 Tax Reform impacts many areas of income tax law. The most material items include the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, limitations on bonus depreciation for utility property and the elimination of the deduction for production activities. GAAP requires the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates be recognized in the period the tax rate change was enacted. As a result of the 2017 Tax Reform, Nevada Power reduced deferred income tax liabilities $787 million. As it is probable the change in deferred taxes will be passed back to customers through regulatory mechanisms, Nevada Power increased net regulatory liabilities by $792 million.

In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 to assist in the implementation process of the 2017 Tax Reform by allowing for calculations to be classified as provisional and subject to remeasurement. There are three different classifications for the accounting: (1) completed, (2) not complete but reasonably estimable or (3) not complete and amounts are not reasonably estimable. Nevada Power has recorded the impacts of the 2017 Tax Reform and believes all the impacts to be complete with the exception of the interpretation of the bonus depreciation rules. Nevada Power has determined the amounts recorded and the interpretation relating to this item to be provisional and subject to remeasurement during the measurement period upon obtaining the necessary additional information to complete the accounting. Nevada Power believes its interpretations for bonus depreciation to be reasonable, however, as the guidance is clarified estimates may change. The accounting is estimated to be completed by December 2018.

Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following forfirm commitments that are not reflected on the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
      
Current – Federal$62
 $68
 $
Deferred – Federal95
 79
 163
Investment tax credits(1) (1) (1)
Total income tax expense$156
 $146
 $162

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 2017 2016 2015
      
Federal statutory income tax rate35% 35 % 35%
Effect of ratemaking1
 
 1
Effect of tax rate change1
 
 
Other1
 (1) 
Effective income tax rate38% 34 % 36%


The net deferred income tax liability consists of the followingConsolidated Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as of December 31, 2022 are as follows (in millions):
202320242025202620272028 and ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$1,149 $485 $357 $360 $349 $2,871 $5,571 
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)60 181 211 211 211 4,148 5,022 
Construction commitments525 77 20 21 10 — 653 
Easements50 64 
Maintenance, service and other contracts30 24 24 19 11 38 146 
Total commitments$1,769 $770 $614 $613 $583 $7,107 $11,456 
 2017 2016
Deferred income tax assets:   
Regulatory liabilities$201
 $83
Capital and financial leases100
 170
Employee benefits18
 29
Customer advances14
 23
Federal net operating loss and credit carryforwards
 5
Other6
 16
Total deferred income tax assets339
 326
Valuation allowance
 (5)
Total deferred income tax assets, net339
 321
    
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Property related items(796) (1,293)
Regulatory assets(206) (321)
Capital and financial leases(97) (165)
Other(7) (16)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(1,106) (1,795)
Net deferred income tax liability$(767) $(1,474)


Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments
The United States federal jurisdiction is the only significant income tax jurisdiction for NV Energy. In July 2012, the United States Internal Revenue Service and the Joint Committee on Taxation concluded their examination of NV Energy with respect to its United States federal income tax returns for December 31, 2005 through December 31, 2008.

Purchased Power
(11)
Related Party Transactions


Nevada Power has an intercompany administrative services agreement with BHEseveral contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy which have been approved by the PUCN. The expiration of these contracts range from 2023 to 2067. Purchased power includes estimated payments for contracts which meet the definition of a lease and its subsidiaries. Amounts chargedpayments are based on the amount of energy expected to be generated. See Note 5 for further discussion of Nevada Power under this agreement totaled $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.Power's lease commitments.


Kern RiverNatural Gas Transmission Company, an indirect subsidiary of BHE, provided natural

Nevada Power's gas transportation contracts expire from 2027 to 2039 and other servicesthe gas supply contracts expires from 2023 to Nevada Power of $66 million, $68 million2024.

345


Fuel and $68 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to Kern River Gas Transmission Company of $5 million.Capacity Contract Commitments - Not Commercially Operable


Nevada Power provided electricityhas several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy in which the facility remains under development. Amounts represent the estimated payments under renewable energy power purchase contracts, which have been approved by the PUCN and are contingent upon the developers obtaining commercial operation and their ability to deliver power.

Construction Commitments

Nevada Power's construction commitments included in the table above relate to firm commitments and include costs associated with a planned 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada, a planned 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada and certain other services to PacifiCorp, an indirect subsidiary of BHE, of $3 million, $2 milliongenerating plant projects.

Easements

Nevada Power has non-cancelable easements for land. Operations and $3maintenance expense on non-cancelable easements totaled $4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015, respectively. There were no receivables associated with these services as of December 31, 20172020.

Maintenance, Service and 2016. PacifiCorp provided electricity and the sale of renewable energy credits to Nevada Power of $- million, $- million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. There were no payables associated with these transactions as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.Other Contracts


Nevada Power provided electricity to Sierra Pacific of $104 million, $78 million and $69 millionhas long-term service agreements for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Receivables associated with these transactions were $10 million and $45 million asperformance of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Nevada Power purchased electricity from Sierra Pacific of $21 million, $17 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Payables associated with these transactions were $- million and $12 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.


Nevada Power incurs intercompany administrative and shared facility costs with NV Energy and Sierra Pacific. These transactions are governed by an intercompany service agreement and are priced at cost. Nevada Power provided services to NV Energy of $- million, $1 million, $1 million for each of the years ending December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. NV Energy provided services to Nevada Power of $10 million, $10 million and $12 million for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Nevada Power provided services to Sierra Pacific of $27 million, $24 million and $22 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Sierra Pacific provided services to Nevada Power of $17 million, $14 million and $16 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to NV Energy of $29 million and $32 million, respectively. There were no receivables due from NV Energy as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included receivables due from Sierra Pacific of $5 million and $4 million, respectively. There were no payables due to Sierra Pacific as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Nevada Power is party to a tax-sharing agreement with NV Energy and NV Energy is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated United States federal income tax return. Federal income taxes payable to NV Energy were $38 million and $68 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Nevada Power made cash payments of $89 million, $- million and $- million for federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Certain disbursements for accounts payable and payroll are made by NV Energymaintenance on behalf of Nevada Power and reimbursed automatically when settled by the bank. Thesegeneration units. Obligation amounts are recorded as accounts payable at the time of disbursement.

(12)    Retirement Plan and Postretirement Benefits

Nevada Power is a participant in benefit plans sponsored by NV Energy.based on estimated usage. The NV Energy Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan ("Qualified Pension Plan") and a supplemental executive retirement plan and a restoration plan (collectively, "Non‑Qualified Pension Plans") that provide pension benefits for eligible employees. The NV Energy Comprehensive Welfare Benefit and Cafeteria Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Plans") on behalf of Nevada Power. Nevada Power contributed $1 million, $36 million and $- million to the Qualified Pension Plan for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Nevada Power contributed $1 million, $- million and $- million to the Non-Qualified Pension Plans for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Nevada Power did not make any contributions to the Other Postretirement Plans for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Amounts attributable to Nevada Power were allocated from NV Energy based upon the current, or in the case of retirees, previous, employment location. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates. Net periodic benefit costs not included in regulated rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net.

Amounts receivable from (payable to) NV Energy are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016
Qualified Pension Plan -   
Other long-term liabilities$(23) $(24)
    
Non-Qualified Pension Plans:   
Other current liabilities(1) (1)
Other long-term liabilities(10) (9)
    
Other Postretirement Plans -   
Other long-term liabilities1
 (4)

(13)    Asset Retirement Obligations

Nevada Power estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.


Nevada Power does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $307 million and $294 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table presents Nevada Power's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016
    
Waste water remediation$39
 $38
Evaporative ponds and dry ash landfills11
 22
Asbestos3
 4
Solar3
 2
Other24
 17
Total asset retirement obligations$80
 $83

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Nevada Power's ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$83
 $85
Change in estimated costs6
 4
Retirements(13) (10)
Accretion4
 4
Ending balance$80
 $83
    
Reflected as:   
Other current liabilities$4
 $20
Other long-term liabilities76
 63
 $80
 $83

In 2008, Nevada Power signed an administrative order of consent as owner and operator of Reid Gardner Generating Station Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and as co-owner and operating agent of Unit No. 4. Based on the administrative order of consent, Nevada Power recorded estimated AROs and capital remediation costs. However, actual costs of work under the administrative order of consent may vary significantly once the scope of work is defined and additional site characterization has been completed. In connection with the termination of the co-ownership arrangement, effective October 22, 2013, between Nevada Power and California Department of Water Resources ("CDWR") for the Reid Gardner Generating Station Unit No. 4, Nevada Power and CDWR entered into a cost-sharing agreement that sets forth how the parties will jointly share in costs associated with all investigation, characterization and, if necessary, remedial activities as required under the administrative order of consent.

Certain of Nevada Power's decommissioning and reclamation obligations relate to jointly-owned facilities, and as such, Nevada Power is committed to pay a proportionate share of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, the respective subsidiary may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. Management has identified legal obligations to retire generation plant assets specified in land leases for Nevada Power's jointly-owned Navajo Generating Station and the Higgins Generating Station. Provisions of the lease require the lessees to remove the facilities upon request of the lessors at the expiration of the leases. Nevada Power's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.these service agreements range from 2023 to 2031.


(14)
Commitments and Contingencies


Environmental Laws and Regulations


Nevada Power is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, renewable portfolio standards,climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact Nevada Power'sits current and future operations. Nevada Power believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.


Senate Bill 123


In June 2013, the Nevada State Legislature passed Senate Bill No. 123 ("SB 123"), which included the retirement of coal plants and replacing the capacity with renewable facilities and other generating facilities. In May 2014, Nevada Power filed its Emissions Reduction and Capacity Replacement Plan ("ERCR PlanPlan") in compliance with SB 123. In July 2015, Nevada Power filed an amendment to its ERCR Plan with the PUCN which was approved in September 2015. In June 2015, the Nevada State Legislature passed Assembly Bill No. 498, which modified the capacity replacement components of SB 123.


In compliance with SB 123, Nevada Power retired 255 MWs of coal-fueled generation in 2019 in addition to the 557 MWs of coal-fueled generation retired in 2017. Consistent with the ERCR Plan, between 2014 and 2016, Nevada Power acquired a 272-MW536 MWs of natural gas co-generating facility in 2014, acquired a 210-MW natural gas peaking facility in 2014,generating resources, executed long-term power purchase agreements for 200 MWs of nameplate renewable energy capacity and constructed a 15-MW solar photovoltaic facility in 2015, contracted two renewable power purchase agreements with 100-MW solar photovoltaic generating facilities in 2015, contracted a renewable power purchase agreement with 100-MW solar photovoltaic generating facility in 2016 and acquired the remaining 130 MW, 25%, of the Silverhawk natural gas-fueled generating facility in April 2017, of which 54 MW were approved as part of the ERCR Plan.facility. Nevada Power has the option to acquire 35 MWMWs of nameplate renewable energy capacity in the future under the ERCR Plan, subject to PUCN approval. Nevada Power retired Reid Gardner Units 1, 2, and 3, 300 MW of coal-fueled generation, in 2014 and Reid Gardner Unit 4, 257 MW of coal-fueled generation, in March 2017. These transactions are related to Nevada Power's compliance with SB 123, resulting in the retirement of 812 MW of coal-fueled generation by 2019.


Legal Matters


Nevada Power is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. Nevada Power does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. Nevada Power is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties and other costs in substantial amounts.

346


(15)    Revenues from Contracts with Customers

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's Customer Revenue by customer class for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Retail:
Residential$1,440 $1,207 $1,145 
Commercial525 414 384 
Industrial528 386 345 
Other14 14 12 
Total fully bundled2,507 2,021 1,886 
Distribution-only service20 22 24 
Total retail2,527 2,043 1,910 
Wholesale, transmission and other82 74 62 
Total Customer Revenue2,609 2,117 1,972 
Other revenue21 22 26 
Total operating revenue$2,630 $2,139 $1,998 

(16)    Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$121 $115 $115 
Income taxes (refunded) paid$(29)$63 $50 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$98 $53 $32 

(17)    Related Party Transactions

Nevada Power has an intercompany administrative services agreement with BHE and its subsidiaries. Amounts charged to Nevada Power under this agreement, either directly or through NV Energy, totaled $46 million, $30 million and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Amounts charged to Nevada Power in 2022 and 2021 primarily relate to information technology projects billed at a consolidated level and passed through to affiliates.

Kern River Gas Transmission Company, an indirect subsidiary of BHE, provided natural gas transportation and other services to Nevada Power of $49 million, $52 million, $52 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to Kern River Gas Transmission Company of $3 million and $4 million, respectively.

Nevada Power provided electricity and other services to PacifiCorp, an indirect subsidiary of BHE, of $4 million, $3 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were no receivables associated with these services as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. PacifiCorp provided electricity and the sale of renewable energy credits to Nevada Power of $— million, $— million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. There were no payables associated with these transactions as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

347


Nevada Power provided electricity to Sierra Pacific of $362 million, $179 million and $106 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Receivables associated with these transactions were $41 million and $13 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Nevada Power purchased electricity from Sierra Pacific of $86 million, $43 million and $34 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Payables associated with these transactions were $5 million and $— million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Nevada Power incurs intercompany administrative and shared facility costs with NV Energy and Sierra Pacific. These transactions are governed by an intercompany service agreement and are priced at cost. Nevada Power provided services to NV Energy of $3 million, $1 million and $— million for each of the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. NV Energy provided services to Nevada Power of $9 million for the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power provided services to Sierra Pacific of $25 million, $25 million and $26 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sierra Pacific provided services to Nevada Power of $16 million, $15 million and $15 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to NV Energy of $51 million and $33 million, respectively. There were no receivables due from NV Energy as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. In November 2022, Nevada Power entered into a $100 million unsecured note with NV Energy receivable upon demand and $100 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included receivables due from Sierra Pacific of $33 million and $2 million, respectively. There were no payables due to Sierra Pacific as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Nevada Power is party to a tax-sharing agreement with NV Energy and NV Energy is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 federal income taxes receivable from NV Energy were $12 million and $27 million, respectively. Nevada Power received cash refunds of $29 million for federal income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 and made cash payments of $63 million and $50 million for federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Certain disbursements for accounts payable and payroll are made by NV Energy on behalf of Nevada Power and reimbursed automatically when settled by the bank. These amounts are recorded as accounts payable at the time of disbursement.

348


Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section
349


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Pacific during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Sierra Pacific's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K. Sierra Pacific's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

Results of Operations

Overview

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $118 million, a decrease of $6 million, or 5%, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher operations and maintenance expenses, mainly due to higher plant operations and maintenance expenses, lower other, net, mainly due to higher pension expense and lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies, higher depreciation and amortization, primarily due to higher plant in-service, higher interest expense mainly due to higher long-term debt, partially offset by higher electric utility margin and higher interest and dividend income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to higher transmission and wholesale revenue, higher customer volumes and higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals, partially offset by unfavorable price impacts from changes in sales mix. Electric retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.8% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather and unfavorable changes in customer usage. Energy generated decreased 13% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower natural gas- and coal-fueled generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes increased 13% and purchased electricity volumes decreased 5%.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $124 million, an increase of $13 million, or 12%, compared to 2020, primarily due to higher interest and dividend income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances, higher electric utility margin, mainly from price impacts from changes in sales mix and an increase in the average number of customer, primarily from the residential customer class, partially offset by lower revenue recognized due to a favorable regulatory decision and an adjustment to regulatory-related revenue deferrals, higher other, net, mainly due to lower pension expense and higher cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies, higher allowance for equity funds, mainly due to higher construction work-in-progress, higher natural gas utility margin, mainly due to higher commercial usage, and lower interest expense, mainly due to lower carrying charges on regulatory balances, partially offset by higher income tax expense primarily due to higher pretax income, higher depreciation and amortization, mainly from regulatory amortizations and higher plant in-service, and higher operations and maintenance expenses, mainly due to higher plant operations and maintenance expenses and higher legal expenses, offset by lower earnings sharing. Electric retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.9% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable changes in customer usage patterns and the favorable impact of weather. Energy generated decreased 2% for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower natural gas-fueled generation, partially offset by higher coal-fueled generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes increased 20% and purchased electricity volumes increased 4%.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Management utilizes various key financial measures that are prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as, electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin, to help evaluate results of operations. Electric utility margin is calculated as electric operating revenue less cost of fuel and energy while natural gas utility margin is calculated as natural gas operating revenue less cost of natural gas purchased for resale, which are captions presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Sierra Pacific's cost of fuel and energy and cost of natural gas purchased for resale are generally recovered from its retail customers through regulatory recovery mechanisms and, as a result, changes in Sierra Pacific's expenses included in regulatory recovery mechanisms result in comparable changes to revenue. As such, management believes electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin more appropriately and concisely explains profitability rather than a discussion of revenue and cost of sales separately. Management believes the presentation of electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin provides meaningful and valuable insight into the information management considers important to running the business and a measure of comparability to others in the industry.
350


Electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating income, which is the most directly comparable financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table provides a reconciliation of utility margin to operating income for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021Change20212020Change
Electric utility margin:
Operating revenue$1,025 $848 $177 21 %$848 $738 $110 15 %
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 148 36 407 301 106 35 
Electric utility margin470 441 29 %441 437 %
Natural gas utility margin:
Operating revenue168 117 51 44 %117 116 %
Natural gas purchased for resale111 61 50 82 61 62 (1)(2)
Natural gas utility margin57 56 %56 54 %
Utility margin527 497 30 %497 491 %
Operations and maintenance189 163 26 16 %163 162 %
Depreciation and amortization149 143 143 141 
Property and other taxes24 24 — — 24 23 
Operating income$165 $167 $(2)(1)%$167 $165 $%

351


Electric Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to electric utility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$1,025 $848 $177 21 %$848 $738 $110 15 %
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 148 36 407 301 106 35 
Utility margin$470 $441 $29 %$441 $437 $%
Sales (GWhs):
Residential2,747 2,769 (22)(1)%2,769 2,672 97 %
Commercial3,124 3,056 68 3,056 2,977 79 
Industrial2,867 3,716 (849)(23)3,716 3,544 172 
Other13 15 (2)(13)15 15 — — 
Total fully bundled(1)
8,751 9,556 (805)(8)9,556 9,208 348 
Distribution only service2,757 1,639 1,118 68 1,639 1,670 (31)(2)
Total retail11,508 11,195 313 11,195 10,878 317 
Wholesale741 656 85 13 656 548 108 20 
Total GWhs sold12,249 11,851 398 %11,851 11,426 425 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)371 365 %365 359 %
Average revenue per MWh:
Retail - fully bundled(1)
$106.57 $81.77 $24.80 30 %$81.77 $73.89 $7.88 11 %
Wholesale$75.48 $58.14 $17.34 30 %$58.14 $52.52 $5.62 11 %
Heating degree days4,631 4,494 137 %4,494 4,477 17 — %
Cooling degree days1,353 1,366 (13)(1)%1,366 1,176 190 16 %
Sources of energy (GWhs)(2)(3):
Natural gas4,075 4,712 (637)(14)%4,712 5,219 (507)(10)%
Coal1,077 1,220 (143)(12)1,220 855 365 43 
Renewables(4)
26 31 (5)(16)31 37 (6)(16)
Total energy generated5,178 5,963 (785)(13)5,963 6,111 (148)(2)
Energy purchased4,691 4,960 (269)(5)4,960 4,753 207 
Total9,869 10,923 (1,054)(10)%10,923 10,864 59 %
Average cost of energy per MWh(5):
Energy generated$46.05 $28.84 $17.21 60 %$28.84 $20.12 $8.72 43 %
Energy purchased$67.49 $47.39 $20.10 42 %$47.39 $37.46 $9.93 27 %

(1)    Fully bundled includes sales to customers for combined energy, transmission and distribution services.
(2)    The average cost of energy per MWh and sources of energy excludes -, 2 and 10 GWhs of coal and -, 6 and 31 GWhs of natural gas generated energy that is purchased at cost by related parties for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(3)    GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.
(4)    Includes the Fort Churchill Solar Array which was under lease by Sierra Pacific until it was acquired in December 2021.
(5)    The average cost of energy per MWh includes only the cost of fuel associated with the generating facilities, purchased power and deferrals.
352


Natural Gas Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to natural gas utility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$168 $117 $51 44 %$117 $116 $%
Natural gas purchased for resale111 61 50 82 61 62 (1)(2)
Utility margin$57 $56 $%$56 $54 $%
Sold (000's Dths):
Residential11,269 10,662 607 %10,662 10,452 210 %
Commercial5,897 5,524 373 5,524 5,148 376 
Industrial2,211 1,981 230 12 1,981 1,826 155 
Total retail19,377 18,167 1,210 %18,167 17,426 741 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)180 177 %177 174 %
Average revenue per retail Dth sold$8.67 $6.44 $2.23 35 %$6.44 $6.66 $(0.22)(3)%
Heating degree days4,631 4,494 137 %4,494 4,477 17 — %
Average cost of natural gas per retail Dth sold$5.73 $3.36 $2.37 71 %$3.36 $3.56 $(0.20)(6)%

Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021

Electric utility margin increased $29 million, or 7%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to:
$15 million of higher ON Line temporary rider (offset in operations and maintenance expense) for the recovery of deferred costs for ON Line due to the regulatory-directed reallocation of costs between Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific;
$9 million of higher transmission and wholesale revenue;
$4 million of higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals; and
$1 million of higher electric retail utility margin due to higher customer volumes, offset by unfavorable price impacts from changes in sales mix. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.8% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather and unfavorable changes in customer usage.
The increase in electric utility margin was offset by:
$2 million in lower energy efficiency program rates (offset in operations and maintenance expense).

Operations and maintenance increased $26 million, or 16%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher regulatory-approved cost recovery for the ON Line reallocation of $15 million (offset in operating revenue) and higher plant operations and maintenance expenses, partially offset by lower energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue).

Depreciation and amortization increased $6 million, or 4%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher plant in-service.

Interest expense increased $4 million, or 7%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher interest rates and debt.

Interest and dividend income increased $9 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher interest income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances.

Other, net decreased $9 million, or 82%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher pension expense and lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies.
353



Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

Electric utility margin increased $4 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to:
$10 million of higher electric retail utility margin primarily due to higher retail customer volumes. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.9% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable changes in customer usage patterns and the favorable impact of weather, and
$3 million of higher transmission and wholesale revenue.
The increase in electric utility margin was offset by:
$3 million in lower revenue recognized due to a favorable regulatory decision in 2020;
$3 million due to an adjustment to regulatory-related revenue deferrals; and
$2 million due to lower energy efficiency program rates (offset in operations and maintenance expense).

Natural gas utility margin increased $2 million, or 4%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to favorable changes in customer usage patterns.

Operations and maintenance increased $1 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher plant operations and maintenance expenses and higher legal expenses, offset by lower earnings sharing and lower energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue).
Depreciation and amortization increased $2 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to regulatory amortizations and higher plant in-service.

Interest expense decreased $2 million, or 4%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower carrying charges on regulatory
balances.

Allowance for equity funds increased $3 million, or 75%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher construction work-in-progress.

Interest and dividend income increased $5 million for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher interest income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances.

Other, net increased $4 million, or 57%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower pension expense and higher cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies.

Income tax expense increased $3 million, or 20%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher pretax income. The effective tax rate was 13% in 2021 and 12% in 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific's total net liquidity was $299 million as follows (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents$49 
Credit facilities(1)
250 
Total net liquidity$299 
Credit facilities:
Maturity dates2025

(1)Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding Sierra Pacific's credit facility.
354


Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $109 million and $183 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher payments related to fuel and energy costs and the timing of payments for operating costs, partially offset by higher collections from customers.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $183 million and $190 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to the timing of payments for fuel and energy costs, partially offset by higher collections from customers, the timing of payments for operating costs, lower inventory purchases and increased collections of customer advances.

The timing of Sierra Pacific's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $(351) million and $(300) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to increased capital expenditures. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $(300) million and $(246) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to increased capital expenditures. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $282 million and $107 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher contributions from NV Energy, Inc. and greater proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, partially offset by higher long-term debt reacquired, higher repayments of short-term debt and higher dividends paid to NV Energy, Inc.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $107 million and $50 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher proceeds from short-term debt and lower dividends paid to NV Energy, Inc., partially offset by lower proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt.

Ability to Issue Debt

Sierra Pacific's ability to issue debt is primarily impacted by its financing authority from the PUCN. As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific has financing authority from the PUCN consisting of the ability to issue long-term and short-term debt securities so long as the total amount of debt outstanding (excluding borrowings under Sierra Pacific's $250 million secured credit facility) does not exceed $1.9 billion and to issue common and preferred stock so long as the total amounts outstanding do not exceed $2.2 billion and $500 million, respectively, as measured at the end of each calendar quarter. Sierra Pacific's revolving credit facility contains a financial maintenance covenant which Sierra Pacific was in compliance with as of December 31, 2022. In addition, certain financing agreements contain covenants which are currently suspended as Sierra Pacific's senior secured debt is rated investment grade. However, if Sierra Pacific's senior secured debt ratings fall below investment grade by either Moody's Investor Service or Standard & Poor's, Sierra Pacific would be subject to limitations under these covenants.

Ability to Issue General and Refunding Mortgage Securities

To the extent Sierra Pacific has the ability to issue debt under the most restrictive covenants in its financing agreements and has financing authority to do so from the PUCN, Sierra Pacific's ability to issue secured debt is limited by the amount of bondable property or retired bonds that can be used to issue debt under Sierra Pacific's indenture.

355


Sierra Pacific's indenture creates a lien on substantially all of Sierra Pacific's properties in Nevada. As of December 31, 2022, $4.9 billion of Sierra Pacific's assets were pledged. Sierra Pacific had the capacity to issue $2.0 billion of additional general and refunding mortgage securities as of December 31, 2022 determined on the basis of 70% of net utility property additions. Property additions include plant-in-service and specific assets in construction work-in-progress. The amount of bond capacity listed above does not include eligible property in construction work-in-progress. Sierra Pacific also has the ability to release property from the lien of Sierra Pacific's indenture on the basis of net property additions, cash or retired bonds. To the extent Sierra Pacific releases property from the lien of Sierra Pacific's indenture, it will reduce the amount of securities issuable under the indenture.

Long-Term Debt

In June 2022, Sierra Pacific purchased $60 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Gas & Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016B, due 2036, as required by the bond indenture. Sierra Pacific is holding these bonds and can re-offer them at a future date.

In May 2022, Sierra Pacific issued $250 million of 4.71% General and Refunding Mortgage bonds, Series W, due 2052. The net proceeds were used to repay the outstanding $200 million unsecured loan with NV Energy, Inc., repay amounts outstanding under its existing revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

In April 2022, Sierra Pacific entered into a $200 million unsecured loan with NV Energy payable upon demand. The net proceeds were used to purchase certain tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations that were subject to mandatory purchase by Sierra Pacific in April 2022. The loan has an underlying variable interest rate based on 30-day U.S. dollar deposits offered on the London Interbank Offered Rate market plus a spread of 0.75%.

In April 2022, Sierra Pacific purchased the following series of bonds that were held by the public: $30 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016C, due 2036; $25 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016D, due 2036; $25 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016E, due 2036; $75 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016F, due 2036; $20 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016G, due 2036; and $30 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016B, due 2029. Sierra Pacific purchased these bonds as required by the bond indentures. Sierra Pacific is holding these bonds and can re-offer them at a future date.

Future Uses of Cash

Sierra Pacific has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the use of secured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which Sierra Pacific has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including Sierra Pacific's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with Sierra Pacific and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Prudently incurred expenditures for compliance-related items such as pollution-control technologies, replacement generation and associated operating costs are generally incorporated into Sierra Pacific's regulated retail rates. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisition of existing assets.

356


Historical and forecasted capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Electric distribution$128 $96 $113 $125 $112 $269 
Electric transmission60 77 75 45 247 188 
Solar generation— 17 36 — — — 
Electric battery storage— 18 — — 270 196 
Other58 92 127 141 147 116 
Total$246 $300 $351 $311 $776 $769 

Sierra Pacific received PUCN approval through its recent IRP filings for an increase in solar generation and electric transmission and has included estimates from its latest IRP filing in its forecast capital expenditures for 2022 through 2024. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. Sierra Pacific's historical and forecast capital expenditures include the following:
Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Growth projects primarily relate to the Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Operating expenditures consist of routine expenditures for transmission and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Solar generation includes solar photovoltaic panels procured for future growth projects.
Electric battery storage includes a growth projects consisting of a 200-MW battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the Valmy generating station in Humboldt County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2025.
Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of turbine upgrades at the Tracy generating facility, routine expenditures for generation, other operating projects and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.

Material Cash Requirements

Sierra Pacific has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise primarily from long- and short-term debt (refer to Notes 7 and 8), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 5), purchased electricity contracts (refer to Note 14), fuel contracts (refer to Note 14), construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7 and Note 14) and AROs (refer to Note 11). Refer to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

Sierra Pacific has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $647 million on long-term debt, including $48 million due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters

Sierra Pacific is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding Sierra Pacific's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

357


Environmental Laws and Regulations

Sierra Pacific is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact Sierra Pacific's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. Sierra Pacific believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and Sierra Pacific is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt of Sierra Pacific is rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of Sierra Pacific's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.

Sierra Pacific has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. Sierra Pacific's secured revolving credit facility does not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon its availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facility are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, the applicable credit ratings obtained from recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific would not have been required to post additional collateral. Sierra Pacific's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors.

Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where Sierra Pacific operates has not had a significant impact on Sierra Pacific's financial results. Sierra Pacific operates under a cost-of-service based rate-setting structure administered by the PUCN and the FERC. Under this rate-setting structure, Sierra Pacific is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation after Sierra Pacific experiences cost increases. Fuel and purchase power costs are recovered through a balancing account, minimizing the impact of inflation related to these costs. Sierra Pacific attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of periodic rate adjustments for fuel and energy costs, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by Sierra Pacific's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with Sierra Pacific's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Sierra Pacific's Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
358


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Sierra Pacific prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Sierra Pacific defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

Sierra Pacific continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Sierra Pacific's ability to recover its costs. Sierra Pacific believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $611 million and total regulatory liabilities were $455 million as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Sierra Pacific's Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's regulatory assets and liabilities.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Sierra Pacific evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the purposes of impairment analysis, requires the exercise of judgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of fair value or the recoverable amount of an asset may include significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect Sierra Pacific's results of operations.

Income Taxes

In determining Sierra Pacific's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by Sierra Pacific's various regulatory commissions. Sierra Pacific's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Sierra Pacific recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Sierra Pacific's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, Sierra Pacific believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on Sierra Pacific's financial results. Refer to Sierra Pacific's Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's income taxes.

It is probable that Sierra Pacific will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to its customers. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $223 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

359


Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue

Revenue is recognized as electricity or natural gas is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since their last billing is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $94 million as of December 31, 2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month when actual revenue is recorded.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Sierra Pacific's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. Sierra Pacific's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which Sierra Pacific transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with Sierra Pacific's business activities. Sierra Pacific has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's contracts accounted for as derivatives.

Commodity Price Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Sierra Pacific is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Sierra Pacific's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Sierra Pacific's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold, and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific does not engage in proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Sierra Pacific uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Sierra Pacific does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. Sierra Pacific's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates through its deferred energy mechanism, which is subject to disallowance and regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.

The table that follows summarizes Sierra Pacific's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worse case scenarios (dollars in millions).

Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(13)$(3)$(23)
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(33)$(26)$(40)

Sierra Pacific's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts are recoverable from customers in regulated rates and therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose Sierra Pacific to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a net regulatory asset of $13 million and $33 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $13 million and $33 million, respectively. The settled cost of these commodity derivative contracts is generally included in regulated rates.

360


Interest Rate Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, Sierra Pacific's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose Sierra Pacific to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Sierra Pacific were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of Sierra Pacific's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 7 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of Sierra Pacific's short- and long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Sierra Pacific had short-term variable-rate obligations totaling $— million and $159 million, respectively, that expose Sierra Pacific to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on Sierra Pacific's annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Credit Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Sierra Pacific's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Sierra Pacific analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Sierra Pacific enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Sierra Pacific exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions were not material, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral.

361


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

362


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Sierra Pacific Power Company

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sierra Pacific Power Company and subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sierra Pacific as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of Sierra Pacific's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Sierra Pacific's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Sierra Pacific in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Sierra Pacific is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Sierra Pacific's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are described below.material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.


Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Sierra Pacific is subject to rate regulation by a state public service commission as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where Sierra Pacific operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

363


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow Sierra Pacific an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While Sierra Pacific Power Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit Sierra Pacific's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated Sierra Pacific's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected Sierra Pacific's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.


/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 24, 2023

We have served as Sierra Pacific's auditor since 1996.

364


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions, except share data)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $10 
Trade receivables, net175 128 
Inventories79 65 
Regulatory assets357 177 
Other current assets50 35 
Total current assets710 415 
Property, plant and equipment, net3,587 3,340 
Regulatory assets254 263 
Other assets181 205 
Total assets$4,732 $4,223 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$224 $147 
Note payable to affiliate70 — 
Short-term debt— 159 
Current portion of long-term debt250 — 
Other current liabilities108 108 
Total current liabilities652 414 
Long-term debt898 1,164 
Finance lease obligations100 106 
Regulatory liabilities436 444 
Deferred income taxes445 402 
Other long-term liabilities153 158 
Total liabilities2,684 2,688 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholder's equity:
Common stock - $3.75 stated value, 20,000,000 shares authorized and 1,000 issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital1,576 1,111 
Retained earnings473 425 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(1)(1)
Total shareholder's equity2,048 1,535 
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$4,732 $4,223 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



365


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$1,025 $848 $738 
Regulated natural gas168 117 116 
Total operating revenue1,193 965 854 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 301 
Cost of natural gas purchased for resale111 61 62 
Operations and maintenance189 163 162 
Depreciation and amortization149 143 141 
Property and other taxes24 24 23 
Total operating expenses1,028 798 689 
Operating income165 167 165 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(58)(54)(56)
Allowance for borrowed funds
Allowance for equity funds
Interest and dividend income18 
Other, net11 
Total other income (expense)(28)(25)(39)
Income before income tax expense137 142 126 
Income tax expense19 18 15 
Net income$118 $124 $111 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

366


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions, except shares)
RetainedAccumulated
OtherEarningsOtherTotal
Common StockPaid-in(AccumulatedComprehensiveShareholder's
SharesAmountCapitalDeficit)Loss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 20191,000 $— $1,111 $210 $(1)$1,320 
Net income— — — 111 — 111 
Dividends declared— — — (20)— (20)
Balance, December 31, 20201,000 — 1,111 301 (1)1,411 
Net income— — — 124 — 124 
Balance, December 31, 20211,000 — 1,111 425 (1)1,535 
Net income— — — 118 — 118 
Dividends declared— — — (70)— (70)
Contributions— — 465 — — 465 
Balance, December 31, 20221,000 $— $1,576 $473 $(1)$2,048 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

367


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$118 $124 $111 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization149 143 141 
Allowance for equity funds(7)(7)(4)
Deferred energy(267)(116)(17)
Amortization of deferred energy97 29 (14)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(1)(39)(33)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits31 13 12 
Other, net(1)(2)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(52)(27)(81)
Inventories(14)12 (19)
Accrued property, income and other taxes(13)
Accounts payable and other liabilities65 43 87 
Net cash flows from operating activities109 183 190 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(351)(300)(246)
Net cash flows from investing activities(351)(300)(246)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt248 — 30 
Long-term debt reacquired(265)— — 
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt(159)114 45 
Net proceeds from affiliate note payable70 — — 
Dividends paid(70)— (20)
Contributions from parent465 — — 
Other, net(7)(7)(5)
Net cash flows from financing activities282 107 50 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents40 (10)(6)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period16 26 32 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$56 $16 $26 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

368


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)    Organization and Operations

Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific") is a wholly owned subsidiary of NV Energy, Inc. ("NV Energy"), a holding company that also owns Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") and certain other subsidiaries. Sierra Pacific is a U.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial and industrial customers and regulated retail natural gas customers primarily in northern Nevada. NV Energy is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"). BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Sierra Pacific and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Sierra Pacific prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Sierra Pacific defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

369


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of funds restricted by the PUCN for a certain renewable energy contract. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $10 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents included in other current assets
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$56 $16 

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on Sierra Pacific's assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to Sierra Pacific by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, Sierra Pacific primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, Sierra Pacific may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. Sierra Pacific also has the ability to assess deposits on customers who have delayed payments or who are deemed to be a credit risk. The changes in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$$$
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net
Write-offs, net(1)(3)(2)
Ending balance$$$

Derivatives

Sierra Pacific employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.

Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked‑to‑market and settled amounts are recognized as cost of fuel, energy and capacity or natural gas purchased for resale on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.

370


Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of materials and supplies totaling $69 million and $62 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and fuel, which includes coal stock, stored natural gas and fuel oil, totaling $10 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The cost is determined using the average cost method. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and are expensed or capitalized to construction work in process, as appropriate, when used. Fuel costs are recovered from retail customers through the base tariff energy rates and deferred energy accounting adjustment charges approved by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN").

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Sierra Pacific capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. The cost of repairs and minor replacements are charged to expense when incurred with the exception of costs for generation plant maintenance under certain long-term service agreements. Costs under these agreements are expensed straight-line over the term of the agreements as approved by the PUCN.

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by Sierra Pacific's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by Sierra Pacific to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as a non-current regulatory liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

Generally when Sierra Pacific retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated using the composite method, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings with the exception of material gains or losses on regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated on a straight-line basis, which is then recorded to a regulatory asset or liability.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, are capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The rate applied to construction costs is the lower of the PUCN allowed rate of return and rates computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, Sierra Pacific is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets. Sierra Pacific's AFUDC rate used during 2022 and 2021 was 5.52% and 6.75%, respectively, for electric, 5.09% and 5.75%, respectively, for natural gas and 5.23% and 6.65%, respectively, for common facilities.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Sierra Pacific recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. Sierra Pacific's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The costs are not recovered in rates until the work has been completed.

371


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Sierra Pacific evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

Leases

Sierra Pacific has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for transmission and delivery assets, generating facilities, vehicles and office equipment and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities and vehicles. These leases generally require Sierra Pacific to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Sierra Pacific does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating Sierra Pacific is reasonably certain to exercise the option. Sierra Pacific's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

Sierra Pacific's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

Sierra Pacific's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and current finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

Sierra Pacific uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which Sierra Pacific expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Sierra Pacific records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Substantially all of Sierra Pacific's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission, distribution and natural gas and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 842, "Leases" and amounts not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers."

Revenue recognized is equal to what Sierra Pacific has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Sierra Pacific's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $94 million and $78 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued.

372


Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and financing costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes

Berkshire Hathaway includes Sierra Pacific in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, Sierra Pacific's provision for income taxes has been computed on a separate return basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of other comprehensive income ("OCI") are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that Sierra Pacific deems probable to be passed on to its customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.

Sierra Pacific recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Sierra Pacific's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility plant:
Electric generation25 - 60 years$1,298 $1,163 
Electric transmission50 - 100 years993 940 
Electric distribution20 - 100 years1,983 1,846 
Electric general and intangible plant5 - 70 years219 204 
Natural gas distribution35 - 70 years455 438 
Natural gas general and intangible plant5 - 70 years15 14 
Common general5 - 70 years380 370 
Utility plant5,343 4,975 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(1,992)(1,854)
Utility plant, net3,351 3,121 
Construction work-in-progress236 219 
Property, plant and equipment, net$3,587 $3,340 

All of Sierra Pacific's plant is subject to the ratemaking jurisdiction of the PUCN and the FERC. Sierra Pacific's depreciation and amortization expense, as authorized by the PUCN, stated as a percentage of the depreciable property balances as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was 3.0%, 3.1% and 3.2%, respectively. Sierra Pacific is required to file a utility plant depreciation study every six years as a companion filing with the triennial general rate review filings. The most recent study was filed in 2022.

Construction work-in-progress is primarily related to the construction of regulated assets.
373



(4)    Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements, Sierra Pacific, as tenants in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation and transmission facilities. Sierra Pacific accounts for its proportionate share of each facility and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include Sierra Pacific's share of the expenses of these facilities.

The amounts shown in the table below represent Sierra Pacific's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):
SierraConstruction
Pacific'sUtilityAccumulatedWork-in-
SharePlantDepreciationProgress
Valmy Generating Station50 %$399 $327 $
ON Line Transmission Line40 — 
Valmy Transmission50 
Total$443 $337 $

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$16 $15 
Finance leases105 111 
Total right-of-use assets$121 $126 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$15 $15 
Finance leases108 115 
Total lease liabilities$123 $130 

374


The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Variable$103 $86 $78 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization
Interest
Total lease costs$117 $101 $93 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases26.027.427.2
Finance leases28.228.427.8
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases5.0 %5.0 %5.0 %
Finance leases8.4 %8.2 %8.1 %

The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's supplemental cash flow information relating to leases for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(1)$(1)$(2)
Operating cash flows from finance leases(9)(9)(6)
Financing cash flows from finance leases(7)(7)(5)
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases$$— $— 
Finance leases89 

Sierra Pacific has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$16 $17 
202415 16 
202516 17 
202615 16 
202713 14 
Thereafter23 137 160 
Total undiscounted lease payments28 212 240 
Less - amounts representing interest(13)(104)(117)
Lease liabilities$15 $108 $123 

375


Operating and Finance Lease Obligations

Sierra Pacific's operating and finance lease obligations consist mainly of ON Line and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District ("TCID"). ON Line was placed in-service on December 31, 2013. Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power, collectively the ("Nevada Utilities"), entered into a long-term transmission use agreement, in which the Nevada Utilities have a 25% interest and Great Basin Transmission South, LLC has a 75% interest. The Nevada Utilities' share of the long-term transmission use agreement and ownership interest is split at 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, previously split 95% for Nevada Power and 5% for Sierra Pacific. In December 2019, the PUCN ordered the Nevada Utilities to complete the necessary procedures to change the ownership split to 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, effective January 1, 2020. In August 2020, the FERC approved the amended agreement between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC that reallocated the PUCN-approved ownership percentage change from Nevada Power to Sierra Pacific. The term of the lease is 41 years with the agreement ending December 31, 2054. In 1999, Sierra Pacific entered into a 50-year agreement with TCID to lease electric distribution facilities. Total finance lease obligations of $107 million and $110 million were included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, for these leases. See Note 2 for further discussion of Sierra Pacific's remaining lease obligations.

(6)    Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. Sierra Pacific's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred energy costs1 year$277 $107 
Natural disaster protection plan1 year69 62 
Merger costs from 1999 merger24 years63 66 
Employee benefit plans(1)
8 years57 46 
Deferred operating costs7 years35 31 
Unrealized loss on regulated derivative contracts1 year21 35 
OtherVarious89 93 
Total regulatory assets$611 $440 
Reflected as:
Current assets$357 $177 
Noncurrent assets254 263 
Total regulatory assets$611 $440 
(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.

Sierra Pacific had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $143 million and $158 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The regulatory assets not earning a return on investment primarily consist of merger costs from the 1999 merger, a portion of the employee benefit plans, losses on reacquired debt, AROs and legacy meters.

376


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent amounts that are expected to be returned to customers in future periods. Sierra Pacific's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred income taxes(1)
Various$223 $234 
Cost of removal(2)
35 years200 201 
OtherVarious32 28 
Total regulatory liabilities$455 $463 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$19 $19 
Noncurrent liabilities436 444 
Total regulatory liabilities$455 $463 

(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices.

Deferred Energy

Nevada statutes permit regulated utilities to adopt deferred energy accounting procedures. The intent of these procedures is to ease the effect on customers of fluctuations in the cost of purchased natural gas, fuel and electricity and are subject to annual prudency review by the PUCN. Under deferred energy accounting, to the extent actual fuel and purchased power costs exceed fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates that excess is not recorded as a current expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations but rather is deferred and recorded as a regulatory asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and would be included in the table above as deferred energy costs. Conversely, a regulatory liability is recorded to the extent fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates exceed actual fuel and purchased power costs and is included in the table above as deferred energy costs. These excess amounts are reflected in quarterly adjustments to rates and recorded as cost of fuel, energy and capacity in future time periods.

Regulatory Rate Review

In June 2022, Sierra Pacific filed a regulatory rate review with the PUCN that requested an annual revenue increase of $88 million, or 9.7%. In addition, a filing was made to revise depreciation rates based on a study, the results of which are reflected in the proposed revenue requirement. In August 2022, Sierra Pacific filed an updated certification filing that requested an annual revenue increase of $77 million, or 8.5%. Parties to the review filed testimony and evidence in August and September 2022. Hearings in the cost of capital, revenue requirement, and rate design phases were held in September, October, and November 2022, respectively. In December 2022, the PUCN issued an order approving an increase in base rates of $58 million, effective January 1, 2023, reflecting a reduction in Sierra Pacific's requested rate of return, updated depreciation and amortization rates for its electric operations and updated time of use periods to reflect the changes in system costs due to the increased solar generation on the system.


377


(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's availability under its credit facilities as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Credit facilities$250 $250 
Short-term debt— (159)
Net credit facilities$250 $91 

Sierra Pacific has a $250 million secured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at Sierra Pacific's option, plus a spread that varies based on Sierra Pacific's credit ratings for its senior secured long‑term debt securities. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Sierra Pacific had borrowings of $— million and $159 million, respectively, outstanding under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding was —% and 0.86%, respectively. Amounts due under Sierra Pacific's credit facility are collateralized by Sierra Pacific's general and refunding mortgage bonds. The credit facility requires Sierra Pacific's ratio of debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.

378


(8)    Long-term Debt

Sierra Pacific's long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
General and refunding mortgage securities:
3.375% Series T, due 2023$250 $249 $249 
2.600% Series U, due 2026400 397 397 
6.750% Series P, due 2037252 254 253 
4.710% Series W, due 2052250 248 — 
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:
Fixed-rate series:
1.850% Pollution Control Series 2016B, due 2029— — 30 
3.000% Gas and Water Series 2016B, due 2036— — 60 
0.625% Water Facilities Series 2016C, due 2036— — 30 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016D, due 2036— — 25 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016E, due 2036— — 25 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016F, due 2036— — 75 
1.850% Water Facilities Series 2016G, due 2036— — 20 
Total long-term debt$1,152 $1,148 $1,164 
Reflected as:
Current portion of long-term debt$250 $— 
Long-term debt898 1,164 
Total long-term debt$1,148 $1,164 
Annual Payment on Long-Term Debt
The annual repayments of long-term debt for the years beginning January 1, 2023 and thereafter, are as follows (in millions):
2023$250 
2026400 
2028 and thereafter502 
Total1,152 
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost(4)
Total$1,148 

The issuance of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities by Sierra Pacific is subject to PUCN approval and is limited by available property and other provisions of the mortgage indentures. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $4.9 billion (based on original cost) of Sierra Pacific's property was subject to the liens of the mortgages.

(9)    Income Taxes

Income tax expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current – Federal$(12)$$
Deferred – Federal31 13 12 
Total income tax expense$19 $18 $15 

379


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Effects of ratemaking(7)(8)(9)
Effective income tax rate14 %13 %12 %

The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
 20222021
Deferred income tax assets:  
Regulatory liabilities$63 $64 
Operating and finance leases26 27 
Customer advances17 14 
Unamortized contract value
Other
Total deferred income tax assets118 119 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property related items(387)(379)
Regulatory assets(135)(94)
Operating and finance leases(25)(27)
Other(16)(21)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(563)(521)
Net deferred income tax liability$(445)$(402)

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of Sierra Pacific's income tax return through the short year ended December 31, 2013. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, may not preclude the U.S. Internal Revenue Service from adjusting the federal net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans

Sierra Pacific is a participant in benefit plans sponsored by NV Energy. The NV Energy Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan ("Qualified Pension Plan") and a supplemental executive retirement plan and a restoration plan (collectively, "Non‑Qualified Pension Plans") that provide pension benefits for eligible employees. The NV Energy Comprehensive Welfare Benefit and Cafeteria Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Plans") on behalf of Sierra Pacific. Sierra Pacific did not make any contributions to the Qualified Pension Plan for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Sierra Pacific contributed $1 million to the Non-Qualified Pension Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Sierra Pacific contributed $5 million and $1 million to the Other Post Retirement Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Sierra Pacific did not make any contributions to the Other Post Retirement Plans for the year ended December 31, 2020. Amounts attributable to Sierra Pacific were allocated from NV Energy based upon the current, or in the case of retirees, previous, employment location. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates. Net periodic benefit costs not included in regulated rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net.

380


Amounts receivable from (payable to) NV Energy are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Qualified Pension Plan -
Other non-current assets$43 $62 
Non-Qualified Pension Plans:
Other current liabilities(1)(1)
Other long-term liabilities(5)(7)
Other Postretirement Plans -
Other long-term liabilities(2)(10)

(11)    Asset Retirement Obligations

Sierra Pacific estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.

Sierra Pacific does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $200 million and $201 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The following table presents Sierra Pacific's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Asbestos$$
Evaporative ponds and dry ash landfills
Other
Total asset retirement obligations$11 $11 

Sierra Pacific's ARO liabilities beginning and ending balances totaled $11 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. These balances are reflected as other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Certain of Sierra Pacific's decommissioning and reclamation obligations relate to jointly-owned facilities, and as such, Sierra Pacific is committed to pay a proportionate share of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, the respective subsidiary may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. Sierra Pacific's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

381


(12)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

Sierra Pacific is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Sierra Pacific is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Sierra Pacific's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Sierra Pacific's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific does not engage in proprietary trading activities.

Sierra Pacific has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Sierra Pacific uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Sierra Pacific manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, Sierra Pacific may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate Sierra Pacific's exposure to interest rate risk. Sierra Pacific does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in Sierra Pacific's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 13 for additional information on derivative contracts.

The following table, which excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases and normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair value of Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

OtherOtherOther
CurrentCurrentLong-term
AssetsLiabilitiesLiabilitiesTotal
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts (1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (14)(7)(21)
Total derivative - net basis$$(14)$(7)$(13)
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (16)(19)(35)
Total derivative - net basis$$(16)$(19)$(33)

(1)Sierra Pacific's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are included in regulated rates. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a regulatory asset of $13 million and $33 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $13 million and $33 million, respectively.

382


Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
Unit of
Measure20222021
Electricity purchasesMegawatt hours
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms52 53 

Credit Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Sierra Pacific's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Sierra Pacific analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Sierra Pacific enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Sierra Pacific exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in Sierra Pacific's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

The aggregate fair value of Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $— million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which represents the amount of collateral to be posted if all credit risk related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered. Sierra Pacific's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation or other factors.

(13)    Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of Sierra Pacific's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. Sierra Pacific has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Sierra Pacific has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect Sierra Pacific's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. Sierra Pacific develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.
383


The following table presents Sierra Pacific's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds49 — — 49 
Investment funds— — 
$50 $— $$58 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(21)$(21)
As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds10 — — 10 
Investment funds— — 
$11 $— $$13 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(35)$(35)

Sierra Pacific's investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Sierra Pacific transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, Sierra Pacific uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent Sierra Pacific's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. Sierra Pacific bases its forward price curves upon internally developed models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to markets that are not active. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, Sierra Pacific uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The model incorporates a mid-market pricing convention (the mid‑point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient for valuing its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value. The determination of the fair value for derivative contracts not only includes counterparty risk, but also the impact of Sierra Pacific's nonperformance risk on its liabilities, which as of December 31, 2022, had an immaterial impact to the fair value of its derivative contracts. As such, Sierra Pacific considers its derivative contracts to be valued using Level 3 inputs.

Sierra Pacific's investments in money market mutual funds and equity securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

384


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Sierra Pacific's net commodity derivative assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$(33)$$(1)
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities(21)(25)(2)
Settlements41 (15)10 
Ending balance$(13)$(33)$

Sierra Pacific's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of Sierra Pacific's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Sierra Pacific's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$1,148 $1,111 $1,164 $1,316 

(14)    Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments


Nevada PowerSierra Pacific has the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as of December 31, 20172022 are as follows (in millions):
2028 and
20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$413 $244 $184 $134 $127 $1,447 $2,549 
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)11 12 12 11 236 290 
Construction commitments500 741 86 268 — — 1,595 
Easements33 43 
Maintenance, service and other contracts— 25 
Total commitments$930 $1,003 $289 $419 $140 $1,721 $4,502 
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 and Thereafter Total
Contract type:             
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$591
 $450
 $377
 $378
 $380
 $5,208
 $7,384
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)
 15
 22
 24
 25
 421
 507
Operating leases and easements7
 7
 8
 8
 7
 54
 91
Maintenance, service and other contracts46
 44
 43
 39
 37
 40
 249
Total commitments$644
 $516
 $450
 $449
 $449
 $5,723
 $8,231



Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments


Purchased Power


Nevada PowerSierra Pacific has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy which have been approved by the PUCN. The expiration of these contracts range from 20182025 to 2067.2047. Purchased power includes estimated payments for contracts which meet the definition of a lease. Nevada Power's operationslease and maintenance expense for purchase power contracts which met the lease criteria for 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $310 million, $302 million and $264 million, respectively, andpayments are recorded as cost of fuel, energy and capacitybased on the Consolidated Statementsamount of Operations.energy expected to be generated. See Note 5 for further discussion of Sierra Pacific's lease commitments.


CoalAbility to Issue General and Natural GasRefunding Mortgage Securities


To the extent Nevada Power has the ability to issue debt under the most restrictive covenants in its financing agreements and has financing authority to do so from the PUCN, Nevada Power's ability to issue secured debt is limited by the amount of bondable property or retired bonds that can be used to issue debt under Nevada Power's indenture.

Nevada Power's indenture creates a lien on substantially all of Nevada Power's properties in Nevada. As of December 31, 2022, $9.8 billion of Nevada Power's assets were pledged. Nevada Power had the capacity to issue $3.3 billion of additional general and refunding mortgage securities as of December 31, 2022, determined on the basis of 70% of net utility property additions. Property additions include plant-in-service and specific assets in construction work-in-progress. The amount of bond capacity listed above does not include eligible property in construction work-in-progress. Nevada Power also has the ability to release property from the lien of Nevada Power's indenture on the basis of net property additions, cash or retired bonds. To the extent Nevada Power releases property from the lien of Nevada Power's indenture, it will reduce the amount of securities issuable under the indenture.

Long-Term Debt

In October 2022, Nevada Power issued $400 million of 5.90% General and Refunding Mortgage bonds, Series GG, due 2053. The net proceeds were used to repay amounts outstanding under its existing revolving credit facility, to fund capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes.

315


In January 2022, Nevada Power entered into a $300 million secured delayed draw term loan facility maturing in January 2024. Amounts borrowed under the facility bear interest at variable rates based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a pricing margin. In January 2022, Nevada Power borrowed $200 million under the facility at an initial interest rate of 0.55%. In May 2022, Nevada Power drew the remaining $100 million available under the facility at an initial interest rate of 1.24%. Nevada Power used the proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under its existing secured credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

Future Uses of Cash

Nevada Power has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the use of secured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which Nevada Power has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including Nevada Power's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with Nevada Power and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Prudently incurred expenditures for compliance-related items such as pollution control technologies, replacement generation and associated operating costs are generally incorporated into Nevada Power's regulated retail rates. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisition of existing assets.

Historical and forecasted capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Electric distribution$232 $184 $236 $276 $276 $275 
Electric transmission35 57 110 100 333 427 
Solar generation— 85 144 
Electric battery storage— — 271 — — 
Other188 200 323 512 342 150 
Total$455 $449 $762 $1,303 $953 $853 

Nevada Power received PUCN approval through its recent IRP filings for an increase in solar generation and electric transmission and has included estimates from its IRP filings in its forecast capital expenditures for 2023 through 2025. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. Nevada Power's historical and forecast capital expenditures include the following:

Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Growth projects primarily relate to the Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Operating expenditures consist of routine expenditures for transmission and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.
316


Solar generation includes a growth project consisting of a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2023.
Electric battery storage includes two growth projects consisting of a 100-MW battery energy storage system co-located with a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2023. The second project is a 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2023.
Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of turbine upgrades at several generating facilities, routine expenditures for generation, other operating projects and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.

Material Cash Requirements

Nevada Power has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise primarily from long- and short-term debt (refer to Notes 7 and 8), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 5), purchased electricity contracts (refer to Note 14), fuel contracts (refer to Note 14), construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7 and Note 14) and AROs (refer to Note 11). Refer to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

Nevada Power has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $2.4 billion on long-term debt, including $152 million due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters

Nevada Power is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding Nevada Power's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

Nevada Power is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact Nevada Power's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. Nevada Power believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and Nevada Power is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt of Nevada Power is rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of Nevada Power's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.

Nevada Power has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. Nevada Power's secured revolving credit facility does not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon its availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facility are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.

317


In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, the applicable credit ratings obtained from recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2022, Nevada Power would have been required to post $51 million of additional collateral. Nevada Power's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors.

Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where Nevada Power operates has not had a significant impact on Nevada Power's consolidated financial results. Nevada Power operates under a cost-of-service based rate-setting structure administered by the PUCN and the FERC. Under this rate-setting structure, Nevada Power is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation after Nevada Power experiences cost increases. Fuel and purchase power costs are recovered through a balancing account, minimizing the impact of inflation related to these costs. Nevada Power attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of periodic rate adjustments for fuel and energy costs, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by Nevada Power's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with Nevada Power's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Nevada Power's Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Nevada Power prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Nevada Power defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

Nevada Power continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Nevada Power's ability to recover its costs. Nevada Power believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $1.3 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Nevada Power's Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's regulatory assets and liabilities.

318


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Nevada Power evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the purposes of impairment analysis, requires the exercise of judgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of fair value or the recoverable amount of an asset may include significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect Nevada Power's results of operations.

Income Taxes

In determining Nevada Power's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by Nevada Power's various regulatory commissions. Nevada Power's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Nevada Power recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Nevada Power's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, Nevada Power believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on Nevada Power's consolidated financial results. Refer to Nevada Power's Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's income taxes.

It is probable that Nevada Power will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property related basis differences and other various differences on to its customers. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $560 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue

Revenue is recognized as electricity is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since their last billing is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $143 million as of December 31, 2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month when actual revenue is recorded.

Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. Nevada Power's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which Nevada Power transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with Nevada Power's business activities. Nevada Power has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's contracts accounted for as derivatives.

319


Commodity Price Risk

Nevada Power is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Nevada Power is principally exposed to electricity and natural gas market fluctuations primarily through Nevada Power's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Nevada Power's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power does not engage in proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Nevada Power uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Nevada Power does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. Nevada Power's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates through its deferred energy mechanism, which is subject to disallowance and regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.

The table that follows summarizes Nevada Power's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worse case scenarios (dollars in millions).

Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(52)$(23)$(81)
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(113)$(93)$(133)

Nevada Power's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts are recoverable from customers in regulated rates and therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose Nevada Power to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a net regulatory asset of $52 million and $113 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $52 million and $113 million, respectively. The settled cost of these commodity derivative contracts is generally included in regulated rates.

Interest Rate Risk

Nevada Power is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, Nevada Power's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose Nevada Power to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Nevada Power were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of Nevada Power's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 7 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of Nevada Power's short- and long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power had short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $300 million and $180 million, respectively, that expose Nevada Power to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on Nevada Power's annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
320



Credit Risk

Nevada Power is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Nevada Power's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Nevada Power analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Nevada Power enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Nevada Power exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

As of December 31, 2022, Nevada Power's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions were not material, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral.

321


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

322


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Nevada Power Company

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nevada Power Company and subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nevada Power as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of Nevada Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Nevada Power's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Nevada Power in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Nevada Power is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Nevada Power's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Nevada Power is subject to rate regulation by a state public service commission as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where Nevada Power operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

323


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow Nevada Power an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While Nevada Power Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit Nevada Power's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated Nevada Power's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected Nevada Power's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.


/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 24, 2023

We have served as Nevada Power's auditor since 1987.

324


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions, except share data)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$43 $33 
Trade receivables, net388 227 
Note receivable from affiliate100 — 
Inventories93 64 
Regulatory assets666 291 
Other current assets89 86 
Total current assets1,379 701 
Property, plant and equipment, net7,406 6,891 
Regulatory assets628 728 
Other assets388 432 
Total assets$9,801 $8,752 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$422 $242 
Accrued interest40 32 
Accrued property, income and other taxes32 29 
Short-term debt— 180 
Regulatory liabilities45 49 
Customer deposits51 44 
Derivative contracts51 55 
Other current liabilities49 62 
Total current liabilities690 693 
Long-term debt3,195 2,499 
Finance lease obligations295 310 
Regulatory liabilities1,093 1,100 
Deferred income taxes875 782 
Other long-term liabilities299 338 
Total liabilities6,447 5,722 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholder's equity:
Common stock - $1.00 stated value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital2,333 2,308 
Retained earnings1,022 724 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(1)(2)
Total shareholder's equity3,354 3,030 
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$9,801 $8,752 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
325


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue$2,630 $2,139 $1,998 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy1,427 939 816 
Operations and maintenance303 301 299 
Depreciation and amortization417 406 361 
Property and other taxes53 48 47 
Total operating expenses2,200 1,694 1,523 
Operating income430 445 475 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(165)(153)(162)
Capitalized interest
Allowance for equity funds11 
Interest and dividend income47 20 10 
Other, net18 
Total other income (expense)(96)(105)(133)
Income before income tax expense334 340 342 
Income tax expense36 37 47 
Net income$298 $303 $295 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

326


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions, except shares)
Accumulated
OtherOtherTotal
Common StockPaid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholder's
SharesAmountCapitalEarningsLoss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 20191,000 $— $2,308 $493 $(4)$2,797 
Net income— — — 295 — 295 
Dividends declared— — — (155)— (155)
Other equity transactions— — — 
Balance, December 31, 20201,000 — 2,308 634 (3)2,939 
Net income— — — 303 — 303 
Dividends declared— — — (213)— (213)
Other equity transactions— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20211,000 — 2,308 724 (2)3,030 
Net income— — — 298 — 298 
Contributions— — 25 — — 25 
Other equity transactions— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20221,000 $— $2,333 $1,022 $(1)$3,354 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

327


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$298 $303 $295 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization417 406 361 
Allowance for equity funds(11)(7)(7)
Deferred energy(541)(245)(44)
Amortization of deferred energy160 11 (41)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(15)(19)(42)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits49 — (10)
Other, net— 
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(178)45 
Inventories(29)(7)
Accrued property, income and other taxes21 (18)
Accounts payable and other liabilities176 63 (90)
Net cash flows from operating activities355 505 467 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(762)(449)(455)
Proceeds from sale of assets— — 26 
Issuance of affiliate note receivable(100)— — 
Other, net— — 
Net cash flows from investing activities(862)(447)(429)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt694 — 718 
Repayments of long-term debt— — (575)
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt(180)180 — 
Dividends paid— (213)(155)
Contributions from parent25 — — 
Other, net(17)(16)(15)
Net cash flows from financing activities522 (49)(27)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents15 11 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period45 36 25 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$60 $45 $36 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

328


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)    Organization and Operations

Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power"), is a wholly owned subsidiary of NV Energy, Inc. ("NV Energy"), a holding company that also owns Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific") and certain other subsidiaries. Nevada Power is a U.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial and industrial customers primarily in Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson and adjoining areas. NV Energy is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"). BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Nevada Power and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Nevada Power prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Nevada Power defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

329


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of funds restricted by the PUCN for a certain renewable energy contract. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$43 $33 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents included in other current assets17 12 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$60 $45 

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on Nevada Power's assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to Nevada Power by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, Nevada Power primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, Nevada Power may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. Nevada Power also has the ability to assess deposits on customers who have delayed payments or who are deemed to be a credit risk. The changes in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$18 $19 $15 
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net14 13 13 
Write-offs, net(12)(14)(9)
Ending balance$20 $18 $19 

Derivatives

Nevada Power employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.

Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked‑to‑market and settled amounts are recognized as cost of fuel, energy and capacity on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For Nevada Power's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.

330


Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of materials and supplies totaling $93 million and $64 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The cost is determined using the average cost method. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and are expensed or capitalized to construction work in process, as appropriate, when used.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Nevada Power capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. The cost of repairs and minor replacements are charged to expense when incurred with the exception of costs for generation plant maintenance under certain long-term service agreements. Costs under these agreements are expensed straight-line over the term of the agreements as approved by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN").

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by Nevada Power's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by Nevada Power to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as a non-current regulatory liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

Generally when Nevada Power retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated using the composite method, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings with the exception of material gains or losses on regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated on a straight-line basis, which is then recorded to a regulatory asset or liability.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, are capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The rate applied to construction costs is the lower of the PUCN allowed rate of return and rates computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, Nevada Power is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets. Nevada Power's AFUDC rate used during 2022 and 2021 was 6.55% and 7.14%, respectively.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Nevada Power recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. Nevada Power's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The costs are not recovered in rates until the work has been completed.

331


Impairment

Nevada Power evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

Leases

Nevada Power has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for land, generating facilities, vehicles and office equipment and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities, office space and vehicles. These leases generally require Nevada Power to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Nevada Power does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating Nevada Power is reasonably certain to exercise the option. Nevada Power's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

Nevada Power's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

Nevada Power's operating and right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

Nevada Power uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which Nevada Power expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Nevada Power records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Substantially all of Nevada Power's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission and distribution and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of amounts not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 842, "Leases."

Revenue recognized is equal to what Nevada Power has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Nevada Power's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $143 million and $107 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued. In addition, Nevada Power has recognized contract assets of $4 million and $6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, due to Nevada Power's performance on certain contracts.
332



Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and financing costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes

Berkshire Hathaway includes Nevada Power in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, Nevada Power's provision for income taxes has been computed on a separate return basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of other comprehensive income ("OCI") are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with certain property‑related basis differences and other various differences that Nevada Power deems probable to be passed on to its customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.

Nevada Power recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Nevada Power's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Segment Information

Nevada Power currently has one segment, which includes its regulated electric utility operations.

(3)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility plant:
Generation30 - 55 years$3,977 $3,793 
Transmission45 - 70 years1,562 1,503 
Distribution20 - 65 years4,134 3,920 
General and intangible plant5 - 65 years871 836 
Utility plant10,544 10,052 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(3,624)(3,406)
Utility plant, net6,920 6,646 
Nonregulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization45 years
6,921 6,647 
Construction work-in-progress485 244 
Property, plant and equipment, net$7,406 $6,891 

333


Almost all of Nevada Power's plant is subject to the ratemaking jurisdiction of the PUCN and the FERC. Nevada Power's depreciation and amortization expense, as authorized by the PUCN, stated as a percentage of the depreciable property balances as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was 3.1%, 3.2%, and 3.1%, respectively. Nevada Power is required to file a utility plant depreciation study every six years as a companion filing with the triennial general rate review filings. The most recent study was filed in 2017.

Construction work-in-progress is primarily related to the construction of regulated assets.

(4)    Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements, Nevada Power, as tenants in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation and transmission facilities. Nevada Power accounts for its proportionate share of each facility and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include Nevada Power's share of the expenses of these facilities.

The amounts shown in the table below represent Nevada Power's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):
NevadaConstruction
Power'sUtilityAccumulatedWork-in-
SharePlantDepreciationProgress
Navajo Generating Station(1)
11 %$$$— 
ON Line Transmission Line19 121 26 
Other transmission facilitiesVarious56 27 — 
Total$178 $57 $

(1)Represents Nevada Power's proportionate share of capitalized asset retirement costs to retire the Navajo Generating Station, which was shut down in November 2019.

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$$10 
Finance leases303 326 
Total right-of-use assets$312 $336 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$11 $13 
Finance leases313 336 
Total lease liabilities$324 $349 

334


The following table summarizes Nevada Power's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Variable$369 $449 $434 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization14 13 12 
Interest27 28 29 
Total lease costs$412 $492 $478 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases4.85.76.5
Finance leases29.128.728.7
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases4.5 %4.5 %4.5 %
Finance leases8.6 %8.6 %8.6 %

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's supplemental cash flow information relating to leases for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(3)$(3)$(3)
Operating cash flows from finance leases(28)(29)(34)
Financing cash flows from finance leases(17)(16)(15)
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases$— $— $
Finance leases

335


Nevada Power has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$44 $46 
202444 47 
202543 46 
202644 47 
202742 44 
Thereafter— 414 414 
Total undiscounted lease payments13 631 644 
Less - amounts representing interest(2)(318)(320)
Lease liabilities$11 $313 $324 

Operating and Finance Lease Obligations

Nevada Power's lease obligation primarily consists of a transmission line, One Nevada Transmission Line ("ON Line"), which was placed in-service on December 31, 2013. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, collectively the ("Nevada Utilities"), entered into a long-term transmission use agreement, in which the Nevada Utilities have a 25% interest and Great Basin Transmission South, LLC has a 75% interest. The Nevada Utilities' share of the long-term transmission use agreement and ownership interest is split at 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, previously split 95% for Nevada Power and 5% for Sierra Pacific. In December 2019, the PUCN ordered the Nevada Utilities to complete the necessary procedures to change the ownership split to 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, effective January 1, 2020. In August 2020, the FERC approved the amended agreement between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC that reallocated the PUCN-approved ownership percentage change from Nevada Power to Sierra Pacific. The term of the lease is 41 years with the agreement ending December 31, 2054. Total ON Line finance lease obligations of $276 million and $286 million were included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 2 for further discussion of Nevada Power's other lease obligations.

(6)    Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. Nevada Power's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred energy costs1 year654 273 
Decommissioning costs3 years116 169 
Merger costs from 1999 merger22 years105 110 
Unrealized loss on regulated derivative contracts1 year75 117 
Asset retirement obligations5 years69 73 
Deferred operating costs13 years67 93 
OtherVarious208 184 
Total regulatory assets$1,294 $1,019 
Reflected as:
Current assets$666 $291 
Noncurrent assets628 728 
Total regulatory assets$1,294 $1,019 

336


Nevada Power had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $320 million and $371 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The regulatory assets not earning a return on investment primarily consist of merger costs from the 1999 merger, AROs, deferred operating costs, a portion of the employee benefit plans, losses on reacquired debt and deferred energy costs.

Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent amounts that are expected to be returned to customers in future periods. Nevada Power's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred income taxes(1)
Various$560 $603 
Cost of removal(2)
31 years358 348 
Earning sharing mechanism4 years114 73 
OtherVarious106 125 
Total regulatory liabilities$1,138 $1,149 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$45 $49 
Noncurrent liabilities1,093 1,100 
Total regulatory liabilities$1,138 $1,149 

(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices.

Deferred Energy

Nevada statutes permit regulated utilities to adopt deferred energy accounting procedures. The intent of these procedures is to ease the effect on customers of fluctuations in the cost of purchased natural gas, fuel and electricity and are subject to annual prudency review by the PUCN. Under deferred energy accounting, to the extent actual fuel and purchased power costs exceed fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates that excess is not recorded as a current expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations but rather is deferred and recorded as a regulatory asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and would be included in the table above as deferred energy costs. Conversely, a regulatory liability is recorded to the extent fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates exceed actual fuel and purchased power costs and is included in the table above as deferred energy costs. These excess amounts are reflected in quarterly adjustments to rates and recorded as cost of fuel, energy and capacity in future time periods.


337


(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's availability under its credit facilities as of December 31 (in millions):

20222021
Credit facilities$400 $400 
Short-term debt— (180)
Net credit facilities$400 $220 

Nevada Power has a contract$400 million secured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes and provide for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a spread that varies based on Nevada Power's credit ratings for its senior secured long‑term debt securities. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power had borrowings of $— million and $180 million, respectively, outstanding under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding was —% and 0.86%, respectively. Amounts due under Nevada Power's credit facility are collateralized by Nevada Power's general and refunding mortgage bonds. The credit facility requires Nevada Power's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.


As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power had $— million and $15 million, respectively, of a fully available letter of credit issued under committed arrangements in support of certain transactions required by a third party and has provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration date for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew the letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

(8)    Long-term Debt

Nevada Power's long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
General and refunding mortgage securities:
3.700% Series CC, due 2029$500 $497 $497 
2.400% Series DD, due 2030425 422 422 
6.650% Series N, due 2036367 360 359 
6.750% Series R, due 2037349 346 346 
5.375% Series X, due 2040250 248 248 
5.450% Series Y, due 2041250 239 239 
3.125% Series EE, due 2050300 298 297 
5.900% Series GG, due 2053400 394 — 
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:
Fixed-rate series:
1.875% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017A, due 2032(1)
40 39 39 
1.650% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017, due 2036(1)
40 39 39 
1.650% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017B, due 2039(1)
13 13 13 
Variable-rate 4.821% Term Loan, due 2024(2)
300 300 — 
Total long-term debt$3,234 $3,195 $2,499 
Reflected as:
Total long-term debt$3,195 $2,499 

(1)Subject to mandatory purchase by Nevada Power in March 2023 at which date the interest rate may be adjusted.
(2)Amounts borrowed under the facility bear interest at variable rates based on SOFR or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a pricing margin.

338


Annual Payment on Long-Term Debt

The annual repayments of long-term debt for the years beginning January 1, 2023 and thereafter, are as follows (in millions):
2024$300 
2028 and thereafter2,934 
Total3,234 
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost(39)
Total$3,195 

The issuance of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities by Nevada Power is subject to PUCN approval and is limited by available property and other provisions of the mortgage indentures. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $9.8 billion (based on original cost) of Nevada Power's property was subject to the liens of the mortgages.

(9)    Income Taxes

Income tax expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current – Federal$(13)$37 $57 
Deferred – Federal49 — (10)
Total income tax expense$36 $37 $47 

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Effects of ratemaking(11)(11)(8)
Other
Effective income tax rate11 %11 %14 %

The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
 20222021
Deferred income tax assets:  
Regulatory liabilities$186 $195 
Operating and finance leases68 73 
Customer advances27 25 
Unamortized contract value20 25 
Other
Total deferred income tax assets310 326 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property related items(821)(800)
Regulatory assets(273)(204)
Operating and finance leases(65)(70)
Other(26)(34)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(1,185)(1,108)
Net deferred income tax liability$(875)$(782)

339


The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of Nevada Power's income tax return through the short year ended December 31, 2013. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, may not preclude the U.S. Internal Revenue Service from adjusting the federal net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans

Nevada Power is a participant in benefit plans sponsored by NV Energy. The NV Energy Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan ("Qualified Pension Plan") and a supplemental executive retirement plan and a restoration plan (collectively, "Non‑Qualified Pension Plans") that provide pension benefits for eligible employees. The NV Energy Comprehensive Welfare Benefit and Cafeteria Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Plans") on behalf of Nevada Power. Nevada Power did not make any contributions to the Qualified Pension Plan for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power contributed $1 million to the Non-Qualified Pension Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power did not make any contributions to the Other Postretirement Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Amounts attributable to Nevada Power were allocated from NV Energy based upon the current, or in the case of retirees, previous, employment location. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates. Net periodic benefit costs not included in regulated rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net.

Amounts receivable from (payable to) NV Energy are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Qualified Pension Plan -
Other non-current assets$27 $42 
Non-Qualified Pension Plans:
Other current liabilities(1)(1)
Other long-term liabilities(6)(8)
Other Postretirement Plans -
Other non-current assets

(11)    Asset Retirement Obligations

Nevada Power estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.

Nevada Power does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $358 million and $348 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The following table presents Nevada Power's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Waste water remediation$31 $37 
Evaporative ponds and dry ash landfills14 13 
Solar-powered generating facilities
Other11 15 
Total asset retirement obligations$59 $68 

340


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Nevada Power's ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$68 $72 
Change in estimated costs— 
Retirements(16)(6)
Accretion
Ending balance$59 $68 
Reflected as:
Other current liabilities$16 $19 
Other long-term liabilities43 49 
$59 $68 

In 2008, Nevada Power signed an administrative order of consent as owner and operator of Reid Gardner Generating Station Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and as co-owner and operating agent of Unit No. 4. Based on the administrative order of consent, Nevada Power recorded estimated AROs and capital remediation costs. However, actual costs of work under the administrative order of consent may vary significantly once the scope of work is defined and additional site characterization has been completed. In connection with the termination of the co-ownership arrangement, effective October 22, 2013, between Nevada Power and California Department of Water Resources ("CDWR") for the Reid Gardner Generating Station Unit No. 4, Nevada Power and CDWR entered into a cost-sharing agreement that sets forth how the parties will jointly share in costs associated with all investigation, characterization and, if necessary, remedial activities as required under the administrative order of consent.

Certain of Nevada Power's decommissioning and reclamation obligations relate to jointly-owned facilities, and as such, Nevada Power is committed to pay a proportionate share of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, the respective subsidiary may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. Management has identified legal obligations to retire generation plant assets specified in land leases for Nevada Power's jointly-owned Navajo Generating Station, retired in November 2019, and the Higgins Generating Station. Provisions of the lease require the lessees to remove the facilities upon request of the lessors at the expiration of the leases. Nevada Power's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(12)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

Nevada Power is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Nevada Power is principally exposed to electricity and natural gas market fluctuations primarily through Nevada Power's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Nevada Power's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of coalfuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power does not engage in proprietary trading activities.

Nevada Power has established a risk management process that extendsis designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Nevada Power uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Nevada Power manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through 2018.the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, Nevada Power may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate Nevada Power's exposure to interest rate risk. Nevada Power does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in Nevada Power's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 13 for additional information on derivative contracts.

341


The following table, which excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases and normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair value of Nevada Power's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

Derivative
OtherContracts -Other
CurrentCurrentLong-term
AssetsLiabilitiesLiabilitiesTotal
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts (1):
Commodity assets$23 $— $— $23 
Commodity liabilities— (51)(24)(75)
Total derivative - net basis$23 $(51)$(24)$(52)
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (55)(62)(117)
Total derivative - net basis$$(55)$(62)$(113)

(1)Nevada Power's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are included in regulated rates. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a regulatory asset of $52 million and $113 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $52 million and $113 million, respectively.

Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
Unit of
Measure20222021
Electricity purchasesMegawatt hours
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms109 119 

Credit Risk

Nevada Power is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Nevada Power's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Nevada Power analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Nevada Power enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Nevada Power exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

342


Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels "credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in Nevada Power's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, Nevada Power's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

The aggregate fair value of Nevada Power's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $5 million and $6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which represents the amount of collateral to be posted if all credit risk related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered. Nevada Power's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation or other factors.

(13)    Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of Nevada Power's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. Nevada Power has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Nevada Power has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect Nevada Power's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. Nevada Power develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

343


The following table presents Nevada Power's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $23 $23 
Money market mutual funds34 — — 34 
Investment funds— — 
$37 $— $23 $60 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(75)$(75)
As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds34 — — 34 
Investment funds— — 
$37 $— $$41 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(117)$(117)

Nevada Power's investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Nevada Power transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, Nevada Power uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent Nevada Power's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. Nevada Power bases its forward price curves upon internally developed models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to markets that are not active. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, Nevada Power uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The model incorporates a mid-market pricing convention (the mid‑point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient for valuing its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value. The determination of the fair value for derivative contracts not only includes counterparty risk, but also the impact of Nevada Power's nonperformance risk on its liabilities, which as of December 31, 2022, had an immaterial impact to the fair value of its derivative contracts. As such, Nevada Power considers its derivative contracts to be valued using Level 3 inputs.

Nevada Power's investments in money market mutual funds and equity securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

344


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Nevada Power's net commodity derivative assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$(113)$15 $(8)
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities(68)(90)(17)
Settlements129 (38)40 
Ending balance$(52)$(113)$15 

Nevada Power's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of Nevada Power's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Nevada Power's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$3,195 $3,114 $2,499 $3,067 

(14)    Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Nevada Power has the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as of December 31, 2022 are as follows (in millions):
202320242025202620272028 and ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$1,149 $485 $357 $360 $349 $2,871 $5,571 
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)60 181 211 211 211 4,148 5,022 
Construction commitments525 77 20 21 10 — 653 
Easements50 64 
Maintenance, service and other contracts30 24 24 19 11 38 146 
Total commitments$1,769 $770 $614 $613 $583 $7,107 $11,456 

Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments

Purchased Power

Nevada Power has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy which have been approved by the PUCN. The expiration of these contracts range from 2023 to 2067. Purchased power includes estimated payments for contracts which meet the definition of a lease and payments are based on the amount of energy expected to be generated. See Note 5 for further discussion of Nevada Power's lease commitments.

Natural Gas

Nevada Power's gas transportation contracts expire from 20222027 to 20322039 and the gas supply contractcontracts expires from 20182023 to 2019.2024.


345


Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments - Not Commercially Operable


Nevada Power has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy in which the facility remains under development. Amounts represent the estimated payments under renewable energy power purchase contracts, which have been approved by the PUCN and are contingent upon the developers obtaining commercial operation and their ability to deliver power.


Operating LeasesConstruction Commitments

Nevada Power's construction commitments included in the table above relate to firm commitments and include costs associated with a planned 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada, a planned 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada and certain other generating plant projects.

Easements


Nevada Power has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office equipment, office space, certain operating facilities, vehicles and land. These leases generally require Nevada Power to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Nevada Power also has non-cancelable easements for land. Operations and maintenance expense on non-cancelable operating leases and easements totaled $9 million, $13 million and $11$4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015, respectively.2020.


Maintenance, Service and Other Contracts


Nevada Power has long-term service agreements for the performance of maintenance on generation units. Obligation amounts are based on estimated usage. The estimated expiration of these service agreements range from 2023 to 2031.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

Nevada Power is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. Nevada Power believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Senate Bill 123

In June 2013, the Nevada State Legislature passed Senate Bill 123 ("SB 123"), which included the retirement of coal plants and replacing the capacity with renewable facilities and other generating facilities. In May 2014, Nevada Power filed its Emissions Reduction and Capacity Replacement Plan ("ERCR Plan") in compliance with SB 123. In July 2015, Nevada Power filed an amendment to its ERCR Plan with the PUCN which was approved in September 2015. In June 2015, the Nevada State Legislature passed Assembly Bill No. 498, which modified the capacity replacement components of SB 123.

In compliance with SB 123, Nevada Power retired 255 MWs of coal-fueled generation in 2019 in addition to 2026.the 557 MWs of coal-fueled generation retired in 2017. Consistent with the ERCR Plan, between 2014 and 2016, Nevada Power acquired 536 MWs of natural gas generating resources, executed long-term power purchase agreements for 200 MWs of nameplate renewable energy capacity and constructed a 15-MW solar photovoltaic facility. Nevada Power has the option to acquire 35 MWs of nameplate renewable energy capacity in the future under the ERCR Plan, subject to PUCN approval.


Legal Matters

Nevada Power is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. Nevada Power does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. Nevada Power is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties and other costs in substantial amounts.

346


(15)    Revenues from Contracts with Customers

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's Customer Revenue by customer class for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Retail:
Residential$1,440 $1,207 $1,145 
Commercial525 414 384 
Industrial528 386 345 
Other14 14 12 
Total fully bundled2,507 2,021 1,886 
Distribution-only service20 22 24 
Total retail2,527 2,043 1,910 
Wholesale, transmission and other82 74 62 
Total Customer Revenue2,609 2,117 1,972 
Other revenue21 22 26 
Total operating revenue$2,630 $2,139 $1,998 

(16)    Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures


The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$121 $115 $115 
Income taxes (refunded) paid$(29)$63 $50 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$98 $53 $32 

(17)    Related Party Transactions

Nevada Power has an intercompany administrative services agreement with BHE and its subsidiaries. Amounts charged to Nevada Power under this agreement, either directly or through NV Energy, totaled $46 million, $30 million and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Amounts charged to Nevada Power in 2022 and 2021 primarily relate to information technology projects billed at a consolidated level and passed through to affiliates.

Kern River Gas Transmission Company, an indirect subsidiary of BHE, provided natural gas transportation and other services to Nevada Power of $49 million, $52 million, $52 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to Kern River Gas Transmission Company of $3 million and $4 million, respectively.

Nevada Power provided electricity and other services to PacifiCorp, an indirect subsidiary of BHE, of $4 million, $3 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were no receivables associated with these services as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. PacifiCorp provided electricity and the sale of renewable energy credits to Nevada Power of $— million, $— million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. There were no payables associated with these transactions as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

347


 2017 2016 2015
      
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information -     
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$167
 $173
 $186
Income taxes paid$89
 $
 $
      
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:     
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$18
 $19
 $51
Capital and financial lease obligations incurred$
 $(1) $(5)
Nevada Power provided electricity to Sierra Pacific of $362 million, $179 million and $106 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Receivables associated with these transactions were $41 million and $13 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Nevada Power purchased electricity from Sierra Pacific of $86 million, $43 million and $34 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Payables associated with these transactions were $5 million and $— million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.



(16)    Unaudited Quarterly Operating Results (in millions)Nevada Power incurs intercompany administrative and shared facility costs with NV Energy and Sierra Pacific. These transactions are governed by an intercompany service agreement and are priced at cost. Nevada Power provided services to NV Energy of $3 million, $1 million and $— million for each of the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. NV Energy provided services to Nevada Power of $9 million for the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power provided services to Sierra Pacific of $25 million, $25 million and $26 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sierra Pacific provided services to Nevada Power of $16 million, $15 million and $15 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to NV Energy of $51 million and $33 million, respectively. There were no receivables due from NV Energy as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. In November 2022, Nevada Power entered into a $100 million unsecured note with NV Energy receivable upon demand and $100 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included receivables due from Sierra Pacific of $33 million and $2 million, respectively. There were no payables due to Sierra Pacific as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Nevada Power is party to a tax-sharing agreement with NV Energy and NV Energy is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 federal income taxes receivable from NV Energy were $12 million and $27 million, respectively. Nevada Power received cash refunds of $29 million for federal income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 and made cash payments of $63 million and $50 million for federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Certain disbursements for accounts payable and payroll are made by NV Energy on behalf of Nevada Power and reimbursed automatically when settled by the bank. These amounts are recorded as accounts payable at the time of disbursement.

348
 Three-Month Periods Ended
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
 2017 2017 2017 2017
        
Operating revenues$392
 $574
 $819
 $421
Operating income52
 157
 317
 37
Net income10
 77
 176
 (8)
   ��    
 Three-Month Periods Ended
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
 2016 2016 2016 2016
        
Operating revenues$399
 $525
 $766
 $393
Operating income46
 141
 324
 69
Net income3
 66
 188
 22




Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section

349

Item 6.        Selected Financial Data



Information required by Item 6 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(a) to Form 10-K.

Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

General

Sierra Pacific's revenues and operating income are subject to fluctuations during the year due to impacts that seasonal weather, rate changes, and customer usage patterns have on demand for electric energy, natural gas and resources. Sierra Pacific's electric segment is summer peaking experiencing its highest retail energy sales in response to the demand for air conditioning and its natural gas segment is winter peaking due to sales in response to the demand for heating. The variations in energy usage due to varying weather, customer growth and other energy usage patterns, including energy efficiency and conservation measures, necessitates a continual balancing of loads and resources and purchases and sales of energy under short- and long-term energy supply contracts. As a result, the prudent management and optimization of available resources has a direct effect on the operating and financial performance of Sierra Pacific. Additionally, the timely recovery of purchased power, fuel costs and other costs and the ability to earn a fair return on investments through rates are essential to the operating and financial performance of Sierra Pacific.


The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Pacific during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Sierra Pacific's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K. Sierra Pacific's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.


Results of Operations


Overview

Net income for the year ended December 31, 20172022 was $109$118 million, an increasea decrease of $25$6 million, or 30%5%, compared to 2016, which includes $1 million of tax benefit from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (the "2017 Tax Reform"). Excluding the impact of 2017 Tax Reform, adjusted net income was $108 million, an increase of $24 million compared to 2016,2021, primarily due to higher operations and maintenance expenses, mainly due to higher plant operations and maintenance expenses, lower interest on deferred chargesother, net, mainly due to higher pension expense and long-term debtlower cash surrender value of $11 million,corporate-owned life insurance policies, higher electric margins of $8 million, lower depreciation and amortization, primarily due to regulatory amortizations of $4 million and lower operating costs of $4 million. The increase in electric margin washigher plant in-service, higher interest expense mainly due to the impacts of weather, higher transmission revenue and customer usage patterns,long-term debt, partially offset by lowerhigher electric utility margin and higher interest and dividend income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to higher transmission and wholesale revenue, higher customer volumes and higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals, partially offset by unfavorable price impacts from changes in sales mix. Electric retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.8% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather and unfavorable changes in customer usage. Energy generated decreased 13% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower volumes.natural gas- and coal-fueled generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes increased 13% and purchased electricity volumes decreased 5%.


Net income for the year ended December 31, 20162021 was $84$124 million, an increase of $1$13 million, or 1%12%, compared to 2015. Net2020, primarily due to higher interest and dividend income, increasedmainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances, higher electric utility margin, mainly from price impacts from changes in sales mix and an increase in the average number of customer, primarily from the residential customer class, partially offset by lower revenue recognized due to a decrease infavorable regulatory decision and an adjustment to regulatory-related revenue deferrals, higher other, net, mainly due to lower pension expense and higher cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies, higher allowance for equity funds, mainly due to higher construction work-in-progress, higher natural gas utility margin, mainly due to higher commercial usage, and lower interest expense, from financing transactions in 2016 of $8 million, increased customer growth and usagemainly due to lower carrying charges on regulatory balances, partially offset by higher income tax expense primarily due to the impacts of weather of $7 million and lower planned maintenance costs. The increase in nethigher pretax income, was partially offset by disallowances resulting from the settlement of the regulatory rate review in 2016 of $5 million, higher depreciation and amortization, primarilymainly from regulatory amortizations and higher plant in-service, and higher operations and maintenance expenses, mainly due to higher plant placed in-serviceoperations and maintenance expenses and higher legal expenses, offset by lower earnings sharing. Electric retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.9% primarily due to an increase in the average number of $5 million, a settlement payment associated with terminated transmission service in 2015 of $4 million and lower margins from a decrease in wholesale demand charges andcustomers, favorable changes in customer usage patterns and the favorable impact of weather. Energy generated decreased 2% for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower natural gas-fueled generation, partially offset by higher coal-fueled generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes increased 20% and purchased electricity volumes increased 4%.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Management utilizes various key financial measures that are prepared in accordance with commercialGAAP, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as, electric utility margin and industrial customers.

Operating revenue;natural gas utility margin, to help evaluate results of operations. Electric utility margin is calculated as electric operating revenue less cost of fuel and energy while natural gas utility margin is calculated as natural gas operating revenue less cost of natural gas purchased for resale, which are captions presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Sierra Pacific's cost of fuel and energy and capacity; andcost of natural gas purchased for resale are key drivers ofgenerally recovered from its retail customers through regulatory recovery mechanisms and, as a result, changes in Sierra Pacific's results of operations as they encompass retail and wholesale electricityexpenses included in regulatory recovery mechanisms result in comparable changes to revenue. As such, management believes electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin more appropriately and concisely explains profitability rather than a discussion of revenue and cost of sales separately. Management believes the direct costs associated with providing electricitypresentation of electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin provides meaningful and valuable insight into the information management considers important to customers. Sierra Pacific believes thatrunning the business and a discussionmeasure of grosscomparability to others in the industry.
350


Electric utility margin representing operating revenue less cost of fuel, energy and capacity and natural gas purchasedutility margin are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, resale,operating income, which is therefore meaningful.


Electric Gross Margin

A comparisonthe most directly comparable financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table provides a reconciliation of Sierra Pacific's keyutility margin to operating results related to regulated electric gross marginincome for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021Change20212020Change
Electric utility margin:
Operating revenue$1,025 $848 $177 21 %$848 $738 $110 15 %
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 148 36 407 301 106 35 
Electric utility margin470 441 29 %441 437 %
Natural gas utility margin:
Operating revenue168 117 51 44 %117 116 %
Natural gas purchased for resale111 61 50 82 61 62 (1)(2)
Natural gas utility margin57 56 %56 54 %
Utility margin527 497 30 %497 491 %
Operations and maintenance189 163 26 16 %163 162 %
Depreciation and amortization149 143 143 141 
Property and other taxes24 24 — — 24 23 
Operating income$165 $167 $(2)(1)%$167 $165 $%

351


Electric Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to electric utility margin is as follows:follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$1,025 $848 $177 21 %$848 $738 $110 15 %
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 148 36 407 301 106 35 
Utility margin$470 $441 $29 %$441 $437 $%
Sales (GWhs):
Residential2,747 2,769 (22)(1)%2,769 2,672 97 %
Commercial3,124 3,056 68 3,056 2,977 79 
Industrial2,867 3,716 (849)(23)3,716 3,544 172 
Other13 15 (2)(13)15 15 — — 
Total fully bundled(1)
8,751 9,556 (805)(8)9,556 9,208 348 
Distribution only service2,757 1,639 1,118 68 1,639 1,670 (31)(2)
Total retail11,508 11,195 313 11,195 10,878 317 
Wholesale741 656 85 13 656 548 108 20 
Total GWhs sold12,249 11,851 398 %11,851 11,426 425 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)371 365 %365 359 %
Average revenue per MWh:
Retail - fully bundled(1)
$106.57 $81.77 $24.80 30 %$81.77 $73.89 $7.88 11 %
Wholesale$75.48 $58.14 $17.34 30 %$58.14 $52.52 $5.62 11 %
Heating degree days4,631 4,494 137 %4,494 4,477 17 — %
Cooling degree days1,353 1,366 (13)(1)%1,366 1,176 190 16 %
Sources of energy (GWhs)(2)(3):
Natural gas4,075 4,712 (637)(14)%4,712 5,219 (507)(10)%
Coal1,077 1,220 (143)(12)1,220 855 365 43 
Renewables(4)
26 31 (5)(16)31 37 (6)(16)
Total energy generated5,178 5,963 (785)(13)5,963 6,111 (148)(2)
Energy purchased4,691 4,960 (269)(5)4,960 4,753 207 
Total9,869 10,923 (1,054)(10)%10,923 10,864 59 %
Average cost of energy per MWh(5):
Energy generated$46.05 $28.84 $17.21 60 %$28.84 $20.12 $8.72 43 %
Energy purchased$67.49 $47.39 $20.10 42 %$47.39 $37.46 $9.93 27 %
  2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
Gross margin (in millions):              
Operating electric revenue $713
 $702
 $11
2 % $702
 $810
 $(108)(13)%
Cost of fuel, energy and capacity 268
 265
 3
1
 265
 374
 (109)(29)
Gross margin $445
 $437
 $8
2
 $437
 $436
 $1

               
GWh sold:              
Residential 2,492
 2,375
 117
5 % 2,375
 2,315
 60
3 %
Commercial 2,954
 2,933
 21
1
 2,933
 2,942
 (9)
Industrial 3,176
 3,014
 162
5
 3,014
 2,973
 41
1
Other 16
 16
 

 16
 16
 

Total fully bundled(1)
 8,638
 8,338
 300
4
 8,338
 8,246
 92
1
Distribution only service 1,394
 1,360
 34
3
 1,360
 1,304
 56
4
Total retail 10,032
 9,698
 334
3
 9,698
 9,550
 148
2
Wholesale 561
 662
 (101)(15) 662
 664
 (2)
Total GWh sold 10,593
 10,360
 233
2
 10,360
 10,214
 146
1
               
Average number of retail customers (in thousands):              
Residential 295
 291
 4
1 % 291
 288
 3
1 %
Commercial 47
 47
 

 47
 46
 1
2
Total 342
 338
 4
1
 338
 334
 4
1
               
Average per MWh:              
Revenue - retail fully bundled(1)
 $76.90
 $78.08
 $(1.18)(2)% $78.08
 $90.85
 $(12.77)(14)%
Revenue - wholesale $50.29
 $52.05
 $(1.76)(3)% $52.05
 $61.37
 $(9.32)(15)%
Total cost of energy(2)
 $27.35
 $28.16
 $(0.81)(3)% $28.16
 $38.80
 $(10.64)(27)%
               
Heating degree days 4,523
 4,185
 338
8 % 4,185
 4,122
 63
2 %
Cooling degree days 1,401
 1,088
 313
29 % 1,088
 1,194
 (106)(9)%
               
Sources of energy (GWh)(3):
              
Coal 457
 751
 (294)(39)% 751
 1,210
 (459)(38)%
Natural gas 4,280
 4,290
 (10)
 4,290
 3,981
 309
8
Other 36
 
 36

 
 
 

Total energy generated 4,773
 5,041
 (268)(5) 5,041
 5,191
 (150)(3)
Energy purchased 5,017
 4,383
 634
14
 4,383
 4,441
 (58)(1)
Total 9,790
 9,424
 366
4
 9,424
 9,632
 (208)(2)


(1)    Fully bundled includes sales to customers for combined energy, transmission and distribution services.
(2)    The average total cost of energy per MWh includesand sources of energy excludes -, 2 and 10 GWhs of coal and -, 6 and 31 GWhs of natural gas generated energy that is purchased at cost by related parties for the cost of fuel, purchased poweryears ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and deferrals and does not include other costs.2020, respectively.
(3)    GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.

(4)    Includes the Fort Churchill Solar Array which was under lease by Sierra Pacific until it was acquired in December 2021.
(5)    The average cost of energy per MWh includes only the cost of fuel associated with the generating facilities, purchased power and deferrals.
352


Natural Gas GrossUtility Margin


A comparison of key operating results related to regulated natural gas grossutility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31 is as follows:31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$168 $117 $51 44 %$117 $116 $%
Natural gas purchased for resale111 61 50 82 61 62 (1)(2)
Utility margin$57 $56 $%$56 $54 $%
Sold (000's Dths):
Residential11,269 10,662 607 %10,662 10,452 210 %
Commercial5,897 5,524 373 5,524 5,148 376 
Industrial2,211 1,981 230 12 1,981 1,826 155 
Total retail19,377 18,167 1,210 %18,167 17,426 741 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)180 177 %177 174 %
Average revenue per retail Dth sold$8.67 $6.44 $2.23 35 %$6.44 $6.66 $(0.22)(3)%
Heating degree days4,631 4,494 137 %4,494 4,477 17 — %
Average cost of natural gas per retail Dth sold$5.73 $3.36 $2.37 71 %$3.36 $3.56 $(0.20)(6)%
  2017 2016 Change 2016 2015 Change
Gross margin (in millions):              
Operating natural gas revenue $99
 $110
 $(11)(10)% $110
 $137
 $(27)(20)%
Natural gas purchased for resale 42
 55
 (13)(24) 55
 84
 (29)(35)
Gross margin $57
 $55
 $2
4
 $55
 $53
 $2
4
               
Dth sold:              
Residential 10,291
 9,207
 1,084
12 % 9,207
 8,649
 558
6 %
Commercial 5,153
 4,679
 474
10
 4,679
 4,198
 481
11
Industrial 1,822
 1,548
 274
18
 1,548
 1,470
 78
5
Total retail 17,266
 15,434
 1,832
12
 15,434
 14,317
 1,117
8
               
Average number of retail customers (in thousands) 164
 162
 2
1 % 162
 159
 3
2 %
Average revenue per retail Dth sold: $5.73
 $7.13
 $(1.40)(20)% $7.13
 $9.57
 $(2.44)(25)%
Average cost of natural gas per retail Dth sold $2.43
 $3.56
 $(1.13)(32)% $3.56
 $5.87
 $(2.31)(39)%
Heating degree days 4,523
 4,185
 338
8 % 4,185
 4,122
 63
2 %


Year Ended December 31, 20172022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 20162021


Electric grossutility margin increased $8$29 million, or 2%7%, for 20172022 compared to 20162021 primarily due to:
$815 million of higher ON Line temporary rider (offset in operations and maintenance expense) for the recovery of deferred costs for ON Line due to the regulatory-directed reallocation of costs between Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific;
$9 million of higher transmission and wholesale revenue;
$4 million of higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals; and
$1 million of higher electric retail utility margin due to higher customer usagevolumes, offset by unfavorable price impacts from changes in sales mix. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.8% primarily fromdue to an increase in the impactsaverage number of weather;
$3 millioncustomers, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather and unfavorable changes in higher transmission revenue and
$2 million from customer usage patterns.usage.
The increase in grosselectric utility margin was offset by:
$62 million in lower energy efficiency program rates (offset in operations and maintenance expense).

Operations and maintenance increased $26 million, or 16%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher regulatory-approved cost recovery for the ON Line reallocation of $15 million (offset in operating revenue) and higher plant operations and maintenance expenses, partially offset by lower energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue).

Depreciation and amortization increased $6 million, or 4%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher plant in-service.

Interest expense increased $4 million, or 7%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher interest rates and debt.

Interest and dividend income increased $9 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher interest income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances.

Other, net decreased $9 million, or 82%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher pension expense and lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies.
353



Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

Electric utility margin increased $4 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to:
$10 million of higher electric retail utility margin primarily due to higher retail customer volumes. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.9% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable changes in customer usage patterns and the favorable impact of weather, and
$3 million of higher transmission and wholesale revenue.
The increase in electric utility margin was offset by:
$3 million in lower revenue recognized due to a favorable regulatory decision in 2020;
$3 million due to an adjustment to regulatory-related revenue deferrals; and
$2 million due to lower volumes.energy efficiency program rates (offset in operations and maintenance expense).


Natural gas grossutility margin increased $2 million, or 4%, for 20172021 compared to 20162020 primarily due to favorable changes in customer usage patterns.

Operations and maintenance increased $1 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher customer usageplant operations and maintenance expenses and higher legal expenses, offset by lower earnings sharing and lower energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue).
Depreciation and amortization increased $2 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to regulatory amortizations and higher plant in-service.

Interest expense decreased $2 million, or 4%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower carrying charges on regulatory
balances.

Allowance for equity funds increased $3 million, or 75%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher construction work-in-progress.

Interest and dividend income increased $5 million for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher interest income, mainly from the impacts of weather.carrying charges on regulatory balances.


Operations and maintenance decreasedOther, net increased $4 million, or 2%57%, for 20172021 compared to 20162020 primarily due to disallowances resulting from the settlementlower pension expense and higher cash surrender value of the regulatory rate review in 2016 of $5 million.corporate-owned life insurance policies.


Depreciation and amortization decreased $4Income tax expense increased $3 million, or 3%20%, for 20172021 compared to 20162020 primarily due to the expiration of various regulatory amortizations.

Other income (expense) is favorable $13 million, or 28%, for 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to a decrease in interest expense from lower rates on outstanding debt balances, lower interest expense on deferred charges and an increase in allowance for funds used during construction.

Income tax expense increased $6 million, or 12%, for 2017 compared to 2016.higher pretax income. The effective tax rate was 34% for 201713% in 2021 and 37% for 2016. The decrease12% in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the effects of 2017 Tax Reform.2020.



Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2015

Electric gross margin increased $1 million for 2016 compared to 2015 due to:
$4 million in higher energy efficiency program rate revenue, which is offset in operating and maintenance expense;
$3 million in higher customer growth and
$2 million in higher customer usage primarily due to the impacts of weather.
The increase in gross margin was offset by:
$4 million related to a settlement payment associated with terminated transmission service in 2015;
$2 million decrease in wholesale demand charges and
$2 million in usage patterns for commercial and industrial customers.

Natural gas gross margin increased $2 million, or 4%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to higher customer usage from the impacts of weather.

Operations and maintenance increased $3 million, or 2%, for 2016 compared to 2015 due to disallowances resulting from the settlement of the regulatory rate review in 2016 of $5 million and higher energy efficiency program costs, which are fully recovered in operating revenue, partially offset by decreased planned maintenance costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $5 million, or 4%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to higher plant placed in-service.

Other income (expense) is favorable $7 million, or 13%, for 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to a decrease in interest expense from financing transactions in 2016.

Income tax expense increased $2 million, or 4%, for 2016 compared to 2015. The effective tax rate was 37% for 2016 and 36% for 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources


As of December 31, 2017,2022, Sierra Pacific's total net liquidity was $174$299 million as follows (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents $4
   
Credit facilities(1)
 250
Less -  
Letters of credit and tax-exempt bond support (80)
Net credit facilities 170
   
Total net liquidity $174
Credit facilities:  
Maturity dates 2020

(1)Cash and cash equivalents$49 
Refer to Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding Sierra Pacific's credit facility.Credit facilities(1)
250 
Total net liquidity$299 
Credit facilities:
Maturity dates2025

(1)Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding Sierra Pacific's credit facility.
354


Operating Activities


Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $182$109 million and $243$183 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher payments related to fuel and energy costs and the timing of payments for fueloperating costs, partially offset by lower contributions to the pension plan.higher collections from customers.


Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $243$183 million and $342$190 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to decreasedthe timing of payments for fuel and energy costs, partially offset by higher collections from customers, due to lower retail rates as a resultthe timing of deferred energy adjustment mechanisms, contributions to the pension plan and lower customer advances, partially offset by lower payments for fuel costs.operating costs, lower inventory purchases and increased collections of customer advances.



Sierra Pacific's income tax cash flows benefited in 2017, 2016 and 2015 from 50% bonus depreciation on qualifying assets placed in service. In December 2017, the 2017 Tax Reform was enacted which, among other items, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, eliminates bonus depreciation on qualifying regulated utility assets acquired after September 27, 2017 and eliminates the deduction for production activities. Sierra Pacific believes for qualifying assets acquired on or before September 27, 2017, bonus depreciation will remain available for 2018 and 2019. In February 2018, the Nevada Utilities made filings with the PUCN proposing a tax rate reduction rider for the lower annual income tax expense anticipated to result from the 2017 Tax Reform for 2018 and beyond. The filing supports an annual rate reduction of $25 million. Sierra Pacific expects lower revenue and income taxes as well as lower bonus depreciation benefits as a result of the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment. Sierra Pacific does not expect the 2017 Tax Reform and related regulatory treatment to have a material adverse impact on its cash flows, subject to actual regulatory outcomes. Refer to Regulatory Matters in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion of regulatory matters associated with the 2017 Tax Reform. The timing of Sierra Pacific's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.


Investing Activities


Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $(186)$(351) million and $(194)$(300) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to decreasedincreased capital expenditures. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.


Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $(194)$(300) million and $(250)$(246) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to decreasedincreased capital expenditures. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.


Financing Activities


Net cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 were $(47)$282 million and $(100)$107 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to lower repaymentshigher contributions from NV Energy, Inc. and greater proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, partially offset by higher long-term debt reacquired, higher repayments of short-term debt and lowerhigher dividends paid to NV Energy, Inc. in 2017, offset by lower proceeds from issuance of long-term debt.


Net cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 20162021 and 20152020 were $(100)$107 million and $(8)$50 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to financing transactions in 2016higher proceeds from short-term debt and higherlower dividends paid to NV Energy, Inc., partially offset by lower proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt.


Ability to Issue Debt


Sierra Pacific's ability to issue debt is primarily impacted by its financing authority from the PUCN. As of December 31, 2017,2022, Sierra Pacific has financing authority from the PUCN consisting of the ability to: (1)to issue additional long-term and short-term debt securities so long as the total amount of updebt outstanding (excluding borrowings under Sierra Pacific's $250 million secured credit facility) does not exceed $1.9 billion and to $350 million; (2) refinance up to $55issue common and preferred stock so long as the total amounts outstanding do not exceed $2.2 billion and $500 million, respectively, as measured at the end of long-term debt securities; and (3) maintain a revolving credit facility of up to $600 million.each calendar quarter. Sierra Pacific's revolving credit facility contains a financial maintenance covenant which Sierra Pacific was in compliance with as of December 31, 2017.2022. In addition, certain financing agreements contain covenants which are currently suspended as Sierra Pacific's senior secured debt is rated investment grade. However, if Sierra Pacific's senior secured debt ratings fall below investment grade by either Moody's Investor Service or Standard & Poor's, Sierra Pacific would be subject to limitations under these covenants.


Ability to Issue General and Refunding Mortgage Securities

To the extent Sierra Pacific has the ability to issue debt under the most restrictive covenants in its financing agreements and has financing authority to do so from the PUCN, Sierra Pacific's ability to issue secured debt is limited by the amount of bondable property or retired bonds that can be used to issue debt under Sierra Pacific's indenture.

355


Sierra Pacific's indenture creates a lien on substantially all of Sierra Pacific's properties in Nevada. As of December 31, 2022, $4.9 billion of Sierra Pacific's assets were pledged. Sierra Pacific had the capacity to issue $2.0 billion of additional general and refunding mortgage securities as of December 31, 2022 determined on the basis of 70% of net utility property additions. Property additions include plant-in-service and specific assets in construction work-in-progress. The amount of bond capacity listed above does not include eligible property in construction work-in-progress. Sierra Pacific also has the ability to release property from the lien of Sierra Pacific's indenture on the basis of net property additions, cash or retired bonds. To the extent Sierra Pacific releases property from the lien of Sierra Pacific's indenture, it will reduce the amount of securities issuable under the indenture.

Long-Term Debt

In June 2022, Sierra Pacific purchased $60 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Gas & Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016B, due 2036, as required by the bond indenture. Sierra Pacific is holding these bonds and can re-offer them at a future date.

In May 2022, Sierra Pacific issued $250 million of 4.71% General and Refunding Mortgage bonds, Series W, due 2052. The net proceeds were used to repay the outstanding $200 million unsecured loan with NV Energy, Inc., repay amounts outstanding under its existing revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

In April 2022, Sierra Pacific entered into a $200 million unsecured loan with NV Energy payable upon demand. The net proceeds were used to purchase certain tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations that were subject to mandatory purchase by Sierra Pacific in April 2022. The loan has an underlying variable interest rate based on 30-day U.S. dollar deposits offered on the London Interbank Offered Rate market plus a spread of 0.75%.

In April 2022, Sierra Pacific purchased the following series of bonds that were held by the public: $30 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016C, due 2036; $25 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016D, due 2036; $25 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016E, due 2036; $75 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016F, due 2036; $20 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016G, due 2036; and $30 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016B, due 2029. Sierra Pacific purchased these bonds as required by the bond indentures. Sierra Pacific is holding these bonds and can re-offer them at a future date.

Future Uses of Cash

Sierra Pacific has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the use of secured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which Sierra Pacific has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including Sierra Pacific's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with Sierra Pacific and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Prudently incurred expenditures for compliance-related items such as pollution-control technologies, replacement generation and associated operating costs are generally incorporated into Sierra Pacific's regulated retail rates. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisition of existing assets.

356


Historical and forecasted capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Electric distribution$128 $96 $113 $125 $112 $269 
Electric transmission60 77 75 45 247 188 
Solar generation— 17 36 — — — 
Electric battery storage— 18 — — 270 196 
Other58 92 127 141 147 116 
Total$246 $300 $351 $311 $776 $769 

Sierra Pacific received PUCN approval through its recent IRP filings for an increase in solar generation and electric transmission and has included estimates from its latest IRP filing in its forecast capital expenditures for 2022 through 2024. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. Sierra Pacific's historical and forecast capital expenditures include the following:
Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Growth projects primarily relate to the Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Operating expenditures consist of routine expenditures for transmission and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Solar generation includes solar photovoltaic panels procured for future growth projects.
Electric battery storage includes a growth projects consisting of a 200-MW battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the Valmy generating station in Humboldt County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2025.
Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of turbine upgrades at the Tracy generating facility, routine expenditures for generation, other operating projects and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.

Material Cash Requirements

Sierra Pacific has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise primarily from long- and short-term debt (refer to Notes 7 and 8), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 5), purchased electricity contracts (refer to Note 14), fuel contracts (refer to Note 14), construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7 and Note 14) and AROs (refer to Note 11). Refer to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

Sierra Pacific has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $647 million on long-term debt, including $48 million due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters

Sierra Pacific is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding Sierra Pacific's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

357


Environmental Laws and Regulations

Sierra Pacific is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact Sierra Pacific's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. Sierra Pacific believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and Sierra Pacific is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt of Sierra Pacific is rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of Sierra Pacific's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.

Sierra Pacific has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. Sierra Pacific's secured revolving credit facility does not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon its availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facility are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, the applicable credit ratings obtained from recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific would not have been required to post additional collateral. Sierra Pacific's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors.

Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where Sierra Pacific operates has not had a significant impact on Sierra Pacific's financial results. Sierra Pacific operates under a cost-of-service based rate-setting structure administered by the PUCN and the FERC. Under this rate-setting structure, Sierra Pacific is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation after Sierra Pacific experiences cost increases. Fuel and purchase power costs are recovered through a balancing account, minimizing the impact of inflation related to these costs. Sierra Pacific attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of periodic rate adjustments for fuel and energy costs, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by Sierra Pacific's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with Sierra Pacific's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Sierra Pacific's Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
358


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Sierra Pacific prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Sierra Pacific defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

Sierra Pacific continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Sierra Pacific's ability to recover its costs. Sierra Pacific believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $611 million and total regulatory liabilities were $455 million as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Sierra Pacific's Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's regulatory assets and liabilities.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Sierra Pacific evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the purposes of impairment analysis, requires the exercise of judgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of fair value or the recoverable amount of an asset may include significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect Sierra Pacific's results of operations.

Income Taxes

In determining Sierra Pacific's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by Sierra Pacific's various regulatory commissions. Sierra Pacific's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Sierra Pacific recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Sierra Pacific's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, Sierra Pacific believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on Sierra Pacific's financial results. Refer to Sierra Pacific's Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's income taxes.

It is probable that Sierra Pacific will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to its customers. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $223 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

359


Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue

Revenue is recognized as electricity or natural gas is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since their last billing is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $94 million as of December 31, 2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month when actual revenue is recorded.

Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Sierra Pacific's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. Sierra Pacific's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which Sierra Pacific transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with Sierra Pacific's business activities. Sierra Pacific has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's contracts accounted for as derivatives.

Commodity Price Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Sierra Pacific is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Sierra Pacific's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Sierra Pacific's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold, and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific does not engage in proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Sierra Pacific uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Sierra Pacific does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. Sierra Pacific's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates through its deferred energy mechanism, which is subject to disallowance and regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.

The table that follows summarizes Sierra Pacific's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worse case scenarios (dollars in millions).

Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(13)$(3)$(23)
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(33)$(26)$(40)

Sierra Pacific's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts are recoverable from customers in regulated rates and therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose Sierra Pacific to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a net regulatory asset of $13 million and $33 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $13 million and $33 million, respectively. The settled cost of these commodity derivative contracts is generally included in regulated rates.

360


Interest Rate Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, Sierra Pacific's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose Sierra Pacific to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Sierra Pacific were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of Sierra Pacific's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 7 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of Sierra Pacific's short- and long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Sierra Pacific had short-term variable-rate obligations totaling $— million and $159 million, respectively, that expose Sierra Pacific to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on Sierra Pacific's annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Credit Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Sierra Pacific's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Sierra Pacific analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Sierra Pacific enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Sierra Pacific exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions were not material, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral.

361


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

362


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Sierra Pacific Power Company

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sierra Pacific Power Company and subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sierra Pacific as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of Sierra Pacific's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Sierra Pacific's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Sierra Pacific in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Sierra Pacific is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Sierra Pacific's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Sierra Pacific is subject to rate regulation by a state public service commission as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where Sierra Pacific operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

363


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow Sierra Pacific an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While Sierra Pacific Power Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit Sierra Pacific's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated Sierra Pacific's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected Sierra Pacific's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.


/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 24, 2023

We have served as Sierra Pacific's auditor since 1996.

364


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions, except share data)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $10 
Trade receivables, net175 128 
Inventories79 65 
Regulatory assets357 177 
Other current assets50 35 
Total current assets710 415 
Property, plant and equipment, net3,587 3,340 
Regulatory assets254 263 
Other assets181 205 
Total assets$4,732 $4,223 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$224 $147 
Note payable to affiliate70 — 
Short-term debt— 159 
Current portion of long-term debt250 — 
Other current liabilities108 108 
Total current liabilities652 414 
Long-term debt898 1,164 
Finance lease obligations100 106 
Regulatory liabilities436 444 
Deferred income taxes445 402 
Other long-term liabilities153 158 
Total liabilities2,684 2,688 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholder's equity:
Common stock - $3.75 stated value, 20,000,000 shares authorized and 1,000 issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital1,576 1,111 
Retained earnings473 425 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(1)(1)
Total shareholder's equity2,048 1,535 
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$4,732 $4,223 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



365


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$1,025 $848 $738 
Regulated natural gas168 117 116 
Total operating revenue1,193 965 854 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 301 
Cost of natural gas purchased for resale111 61 62 
Operations and maintenance189 163 162 
Depreciation and amortization149 143 141 
Property and other taxes24 24 23 
Total operating expenses1,028 798 689 
Operating income165 167 165 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(58)(54)(56)
Allowance for borrowed funds
Allowance for equity funds
Interest and dividend income18 
Other, net11 
Total other income (expense)(28)(25)(39)
Income before income tax expense137 142 126 
Income tax expense19 18 15 
Net income$118 $124 $111 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

366


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions, except shares)
RetainedAccumulated
OtherEarningsOtherTotal
Common StockPaid-in(AccumulatedComprehensiveShareholder's
SharesAmountCapitalDeficit)Loss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 20191,000 $— $1,111 $210 $(1)$1,320 
Net income— — — 111 — 111 
Dividends declared— — — (20)— (20)
Balance, December 31, 20201,000 — 1,111 301 (1)1,411 
Net income— — — 124 — 124 
Balance, December 31, 20211,000 — 1,111 425 (1)1,535 
Net income— — — 118 — 118 
Dividends declared— — — (70)— (70)
Contributions— — 465 — — 465 
Balance, December 31, 20221,000 $— $1,576 $473 $(1)$2,048 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

367


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$118 $124 $111 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization149 143 141 
Allowance for equity funds(7)(7)(4)
Deferred energy(267)(116)(17)
Amortization of deferred energy97 29 (14)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(1)(39)(33)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits31 13 12 
Other, net(1)(2)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(52)(27)(81)
Inventories(14)12 (19)
Accrued property, income and other taxes(13)
Accounts payable and other liabilities65 43 87 
Net cash flows from operating activities109 183 190 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(351)(300)(246)
Net cash flows from investing activities(351)(300)(246)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt248 — 30 
Long-term debt reacquired(265)— — 
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt(159)114 45 
Net proceeds from affiliate note payable70 — — 
Dividends paid(70)— (20)
Contributions from parent465 — — 
Other, net(7)(7)(5)
Net cash flows from financing activities282 107 50 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents40 (10)(6)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period16 26 32 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$56 $16 $26 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

368


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)    Organization and Operations

Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific") is a wholly owned subsidiary of NV Energy, Inc. ("NV Energy"), a holding company that also owns Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") and certain other subsidiaries. Sierra Pacific is a U.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial and industrial customers and regulated retail natural gas customers primarily in northern Nevada. NV Energy is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"). BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Sierra Pacific and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Sierra Pacific prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Sierra Pacific defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

369


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of funds restricted by the PUCN for a certain renewable energy contract. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $10 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents included in other current assets
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$56 $16 

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on Sierra Pacific's assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to Sierra Pacific by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, Sierra Pacific primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, Sierra Pacific may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. Sierra Pacific also has the ability to assess deposits on customers who have delayed payments or who are deemed to be a credit risk. The changes in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$$$
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net
Write-offs, net(1)(3)(2)
Ending balance$$$

Derivatives

Sierra Pacific employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.

Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked‑to‑market and settled amounts are recognized as cost of fuel, energy and capacity or natural gas purchased for resale on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.

370


Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of materials and supplies totaling $69 million and $62 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and fuel, which includes coal stock, stored natural gas and fuel oil, totaling $10 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The cost is determined using the average cost method. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and are expensed or capitalized to construction work in process, as appropriate, when used. Fuel costs are recovered from retail customers through the base tariff energy rates and deferred energy accounting adjustment charges approved by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN").

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Sierra Pacific capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. The cost of repairs and minor replacements are charged to expense when incurred with the exception of costs for generation plant maintenance under certain long-term service agreements. Costs under these agreements are expensed straight-line over the term of the agreements as approved by the PUCN.

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by Sierra Pacific's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by Sierra Pacific to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as a non-current regulatory liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

Generally when Sierra Pacific retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated using the composite method, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings with the exception of material gains or losses on regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated on a straight-line basis, which is then recorded to a regulatory asset or liability.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, are capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The rate applied to construction costs is the lower of the PUCN allowed rate of return and rates computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, Sierra Pacific is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets. Sierra Pacific's AFUDC rate used during 2022 and 2021 was 5.52% and 6.75%, respectively, for electric, 5.09% and 5.75%, respectively, for natural gas and 5.23% and 6.65%, respectively, for common facilities.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Sierra Pacific recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. Sierra Pacific's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The costs are not recovered in rates until the work has been completed.

371


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Sierra Pacific evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

Leases

Sierra Pacific has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for transmission and delivery assets, generating facilities, vehicles and office equipment and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities and vehicles. These leases generally require Sierra Pacific to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Sierra Pacific does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating Sierra Pacific is reasonably certain to exercise the option. Sierra Pacific's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

Sierra Pacific's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

Sierra Pacific's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and current finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

Sierra Pacific uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which Sierra Pacific expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Sierra Pacific records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Substantially all of Sierra Pacific's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission, distribution and natural gas and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 842, "Leases" and amounts not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers."

Revenue recognized is equal to what Sierra Pacific has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Sierra Pacific's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $94 million and $78 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued.

372


Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and financing costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes

Berkshire Hathaway includes Sierra Pacific in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, Sierra Pacific's provision for income taxes has been computed on a separate return basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of other comprehensive income ("OCI") are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that Sierra Pacific deems probable to be passed on to its customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.

Sierra Pacific recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Sierra Pacific's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(3)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility plant:
Electric generation25 - 60 years$1,298 $1,163 
Electric transmission50 - 100 years993 940 
Electric distribution20 - 100 years1,983 1,846 
Electric general and intangible plant5 - 70 years219 204 
Natural gas distribution35 - 70 years455 438 
Natural gas general and intangible plant5 - 70 years15 14 
Common general5 - 70 years380 370 
Utility plant5,343 4,975 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(1,992)(1,854)
Utility plant, net3,351 3,121 
Construction work-in-progress236 219 
Property, plant and equipment, net$3,587 $3,340 

All of Sierra Pacific's plant is subject to the ratemaking jurisdiction of the PUCN and the FERC. Sierra Pacific's depreciation and amortization expense, as authorized by the PUCN, stated as a percentage of the depreciable property balances as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was 3.0%, 3.1% and 3.2%, respectively. Sierra Pacific is required to file a utility plant depreciation study every six years as a companion filing with the triennial general rate review filings. The most recent study was filed in 2022.

Construction work-in-progress is primarily related to the construction of regulated assets.
373



(4)    Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements, Sierra Pacific, as tenants in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation and transmission facilities. Sierra Pacific accounts for its proportionate share of each facility and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include Sierra Pacific's share of the expenses of these facilities.

The amounts shown in the table below represent Sierra Pacific's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):
SierraConstruction
Pacific'sUtilityAccumulatedWork-in-
SharePlantDepreciationProgress
Valmy Generating Station50 %$399 $327 $
ON Line Transmission Line40 — 
Valmy Transmission50 
Total$443 $337 $

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$16 $15 
Finance leases105 111 
Total right-of-use assets$121 $126 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$15 $15 
Finance leases108 115 
Total lease liabilities$123 $130 

374


The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Variable$103 $86 $78 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization
Interest
Total lease costs$117 $101 $93 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases26.027.427.2
Finance leases28.228.427.8
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases5.0 %5.0 %5.0 %
Finance leases8.4 %8.2 %8.1 %

The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's supplemental cash flow information relating to leases for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(1)$(1)$(2)
Operating cash flows from finance leases(9)(9)(6)
Financing cash flows from finance leases(7)(7)(5)
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases$$— $— 
Finance leases89 

Sierra Pacific has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$16 $17 
202415 16 
202516 17 
202615 16 
202713 14 
Thereafter23 137 160 
Total undiscounted lease payments28 212 240 
Less - amounts representing interest(13)(104)(117)
Lease liabilities$15 $108 $123 

375


Operating and Finance Lease Obligations

Sierra Pacific's operating and finance lease obligations consist mainly of ON Line and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District ("TCID"). ON Line was placed in-service on December 31, 2013. Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power, collectively the ("Nevada Utilities"), entered into a long-term transmission use agreement, in which the Nevada Utilities have a 25% interest and Great Basin Transmission South, LLC has a 75% interest. The Nevada Utilities' share of the long-term transmission use agreement and ownership interest is split at 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, previously split 95% for Nevada Power and 5% for Sierra Pacific. In December 2019, the PUCN ordered the Nevada Utilities to complete the necessary procedures to change the ownership split to 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, effective January 1, 2020. In August 2020, the FERC approved the amended agreement between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC that reallocated the PUCN-approved ownership percentage change from Nevada Power to Sierra Pacific. The term of the lease is 41 years with the agreement ending December 31, 2054. In 1999, Sierra Pacific entered into a 50-year agreement with TCID to lease electric distribution facilities. Total finance lease obligations of $107 million and $110 million were included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, for these leases. See Note 2 for further discussion of Sierra Pacific's remaining lease obligations.

(6)    Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. Sierra Pacific's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred energy costs1 year$277 $107 
Natural disaster protection plan1 year69 62 
Merger costs from 1999 merger24 years63 66 
Employee benefit plans(1)
8 years57 46 
Deferred operating costs7 years35 31 
Unrealized loss on regulated derivative contracts1 year21 35 
OtherVarious89 93 
Total regulatory assets$611 $440 
Reflected as:
Current assets$357 $177 
Noncurrent assets254 263 
Total regulatory assets$611 $440 
(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.

Sierra Pacific had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $143 million and $158 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The regulatory assets not earning a return on investment primarily consist of merger costs from the 1999 merger, a portion of the employee benefit plans, losses on reacquired debt, AROs and legacy meters.

376


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent amounts that are expected to be returned to customers in future periods. Sierra Pacific's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred income taxes(1)
Various$223 $234 
Cost of removal(2)
35 years200 201 
OtherVarious32 28 
Total regulatory liabilities$455 $463 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$19 $19 
Noncurrent liabilities436 444 
Total regulatory liabilities$455 $463 

(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices.

Deferred Energy

Nevada statutes permit regulated utilities to adopt deferred energy accounting procedures. The intent of these procedures is to ease the effect on customers of fluctuations in the cost of purchased natural gas, fuel and electricity and are subject to annual prudency review by the PUCN. Under deferred energy accounting, to the extent actual fuel and purchased power costs exceed fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates that excess is not recorded as a current expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations but rather is deferred and recorded as a regulatory asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and would be included in the table above as deferred energy costs. Conversely, a regulatory liability is recorded to the extent fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates exceed actual fuel and purchased power costs and is included in the table above as deferred energy costs. These excess amounts are reflected in quarterly adjustments to rates and recorded as cost of fuel, energy and capacity in future time periods.

Regulatory Rate Review

In June 2022, Sierra Pacific filed a regulatory rate review with the PUCN that requested an annual revenue increase of $88 million, or 9.7%. In addition, a filing was made to revise depreciation rates based on a study, the results of which are reflected in the proposed revenue requirement. In August 2022, Sierra Pacific filed an updated certification filing that requested an annual revenue increase of $77 million, or 8.5%. Parties to the review filed testimony and evidence in August and September 2022. Hearings in the cost of capital, revenue requirement, and rate design phases were held in September, October, and November 2022, respectively. In December 2022, the PUCN issued an order approving an increase in base rates of $58 million, effective January 1, 2023, reflecting a reduction in Sierra Pacific's requested rate of return, updated depreciation and amortization rates for its electric operations and updated time of use periods to reflect the changes in system costs due to the increased solar generation on the system.


377


(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's availability under its credit facilities as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Credit facilities$250 $250 
Short-term debt— (159)
Net credit facilities$250 $91 

Sierra Pacific has a $250 million secured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at Sierra Pacific's option, plus a spread that varies based on Sierra Pacific's credit ratings for its senior secured long‑term debt securities. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Sierra Pacific had borrowings of $— million and $159 million, respectively, outstanding under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding was —% and 0.86%, respectively. Amounts due under Sierra Pacific's credit facility are collateralized by Sierra Pacific's general and refunding mortgage bonds. The credit facility requires Sierra Pacific's ratio of debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.

378


(8)    Long-term Debt

Sierra Pacific's long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
General and refunding mortgage securities:
3.375% Series T, due 2023$250 $249 $249 
2.600% Series U, due 2026400 397 397 
6.750% Series P, due 2037252 254 253 
4.710% Series W, due 2052250 248 — 
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:
Fixed-rate series:
1.850% Pollution Control Series 2016B, due 2029— — 30 
3.000% Gas and Water Series 2016B, due 2036— — 60 
0.625% Water Facilities Series 2016C, due 2036— — 30 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016D, due 2036— — 25 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016E, due 2036— — 25 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016F, due 2036— — 75 
1.850% Water Facilities Series 2016G, due 2036— — 20 
Total long-term debt$1,152 $1,148 $1,164 
Reflected as:
Current portion of long-term debt$250 $— 
Long-term debt898 1,164 
Total long-term debt$1,148 $1,164 
Annual Payment on Long-Term Debt
The annual repayments of long-term debt for the years beginning January 1, 2023 and thereafter, are as follows (in millions):
2023$250 
2026400 
2028 and thereafter502 
Total1,152 
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost(4)
Total$1,148 

The issuance of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities by Sierra Pacific is subject to PUCN approval and is limited by available property and other provisions of the mortgage indentures. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $4.9 billion (based on original cost) of Sierra Pacific's property was subject to the liens of the mortgages.

(9)    Income Taxes

Income tax expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current – Federal$(12)$$
Deferred – Federal31 13 12 
Total income tax expense$19 $18 $15 

379


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Effects of ratemaking(7)(8)(9)
Effective income tax rate14 %13 %12 %

The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
 20222021
Deferred income tax assets:  
Regulatory liabilities$63 $64 
Operating and finance leases26 27 
Customer advances17 14 
Unamortized contract value
Other
Total deferred income tax assets118 119 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property related items(387)(379)
Regulatory assets(135)(94)
Operating and finance leases(25)(27)
Other(16)(21)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(563)(521)
Net deferred income tax liability$(445)$(402)

The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of Sierra Pacific's income tax return through the short year ended December 31, 2013. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, may not preclude the U.S. Internal Revenue Service from adjusting the federal net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans

Sierra Pacific is a participant in benefit plans sponsored by NV Energy. The NV Energy Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan ("Qualified Pension Plan") and a supplemental executive retirement plan and a restoration plan (collectively, "Non‑Qualified Pension Plans") that provide pension benefits for eligible employees. The NV Energy Comprehensive Welfare Benefit and Cafeteria Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Plans") on behalf of Sierra Pacific. Sierra Pacific did not make any contributions to the Qualified Pension Plan for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Sierra Pacific contributed $1 million to the Non-Qualified Pension Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Sierra Pacific contributed $5 million and $1 million to the Other Post Retirement Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Sierra Pacific did not make any contributions to the Other Post Retirement Plans for the year ended December 31, 2020. Amounts attributable to Sierra Pacific were allocated from NV Energy based upon the current, or in the case of retirees, previous, employment location. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates. Net periodic benefit costs not included in regulated rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net.

380


Amounts receivable from (payable to) NV Energy are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Qualified Pension Plan -
Other non-current assets$43 $62 
Non-Qualified Pension Plans:
Other current liabilities(1)(1)
Other long-term liabilities(5)(7)
Other Postretirement Plans -
Other long-term liabilities(2)(10)

(11)    Asset Retirement Obligations

Sierra Pacific estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.

Sierra Pacific does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $200 million and $201 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The following table presents Sierra Pacific's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Asbestos$$
Evaporative ponds and dry ash landfills
Other
Total asset retirement obligations$11 $11 

Sierra Pacific's ARO liabilities beginning and ending balances totaled $11 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021. These balances are reflected as other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Certain of Sierra Pacific's decommissioning and reclamation obligations relate to jointly-owned facilities, and as such, Sierra Pacific is committed to pay a proportionate share of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, the respective subsidiary may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. Sierra Pacific's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

381


(12)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

Sierra Pacific is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Sierra Pacific is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Sierra Pacific's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Sierra Pacific's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific does not engage in proprietary trading activities.

Sierra Pacific has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Sierra Pacific uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Sierra Pacific manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, Sierra Pacific may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate Sierra Pacific's exposure to interest rate risk. Sierra Pacific does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in Sierra Pacific's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 13 for additional information on derivative contracts.

The following table, which excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases and normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair value of Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

OtherOtherOther
CurrentCurrentLong-term
AssetsLiabilitiesLiabilitiesTotal
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts (1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (14)(7)(21)
Total derivative - net basis$$(14)$(7)$(13)
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (16)(19)(35)
Total derivative - net basis$$(16)$(19)$(33)

(1)Sierra Pacific's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are included in regulated rates. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a regulatory asset of $13 million and $33 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $13 million and $33 million, respectively.

382


Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
Unit of
Measure20222021
Electricity purchasesMegawatt hours
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms52 53 

Credit Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Sierra Pacific's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Sierra Pacific analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Sierra Pacific enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Sierra Pacific exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in Sierra Pacific's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

The aggregate fair value of Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $— million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which represents the amount of collateral to be posted if all credit risk related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered. Sierra Pacific's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation or other factors.

(13)    Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of Sierra Pacific's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. Sierra Pacific has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Sierra Pacific has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect Sierra Pacific's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. Sierra Pacific develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.
383


The following table presents Sierra Pacific's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds49 — — 49 
Investment funds— — 
$50 $— $$58 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(21)$(21)
As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds10 — — 10 
Investment funds— — 
$11 $— $$13 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(35)$(35)

Sierra Pacific's investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Sierra Pacific transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, Sierra Pacific uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent Sierra Pacific's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. Sierra Pacific bases its forward price curves upon internally developed models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to markets that are not active. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, Sierra Pacific uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The model incorporates a mid-market pricing convention (the mid‑point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient for valuing its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value. The determination of the fair value for derivative contracts not only includes counterparty risk, but also the impact of Sierra Pacific's nonperformance risk on its liabilities, which as of December 31, 2022, had an immaterial impact to the fair value of its derivative contracts. As such, Sierra Pacific considers its derivative contracts to be valued using Level 3 inputs.

Sierra Pacific's investments in money market mutual funds and equity securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

384


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Sierra Pacific's net commodity derivative assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$(33)$$(1)
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities(21)(25)(2)
Settlements41 (15)10 
Ending balance$(13)$(33)$

Sierra Pacific's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of Sierra Pacific's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Sierra Pacific's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$1,148 $1,111 $1,164 $1,316 

(14)    Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Sierra Pacific has the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as of December 31, 2022 are as follows (in millions):
2028 and
20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$413 $244 $184 $134 $127 $1,447 $2,549 
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)11 12 12 11 236 290 
Construction commitments500 741 86 268 — — 1,595 
Easements33 43 
Maintenance, service and other contracts— 25 
Total commitments$930 $1,003 $289 $419 $140 $1,721 $4,502 

Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments

Purchased Power

Sierra Pacific has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy which have been approved by the PUCN. The expiration of these contracts range from 2025 to 2047. Purchased power includes estimated payments for contracts which meet the definition of a lease and payments are based on the amount of energy expected to be generated. See Note 5 for further discussion of Sierra Pacific's lease commitments.

Ability to Issue General and Refunding Mortgage Securities


To the extent Nevada Power has the ability to issue debt under the most restrictive covenants in its financing agreements and has financing authority to do so from the PUCN, Nevada Power's ability to issue secured debt is limited by the amount of bondable property or retired bonds that can be used to issue debt under Nevada Power's indenture.

Nevada Power's indenture creates a lien on substantially all of Nevada Power's properties in Nevada. As of December 31, 2022, $9.8 billion of Nevada Power's assets were pledged. Nevada Power had the capacity to issue $3.3 billion of additional general and refunding mortgage securities as of December 31, 2022, determined on the basis of 70% of net utility property additions. Property additions include plant-in-service and specific assets in construction work-in-progress. The amount of bond capacity listed above does not include eligible property in construction work-in-progress. Nevada Power also has the ability to release property from the lien of Nevada Power's indenture on the basis of net property additions, cash or retired bonds. To the extent Nevada Power releases property from the lien of Nevada Power's indenture, it will reduce the amount of securities issuable under the indenture.

Long-Term Debt

In October 2022, Nevada Power issued $400 million of 5.90% General and Refunding Mortgage bonds, Series GG, due 2053. The net proceeds were used to repay amounts outstanding under its existing revolving credit facility, to fund capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes.

315


In January 2022, Nevada Power entered into a $300 million secured delayed draw term loan facility maturing in January 2024. Amounts borrowed under the facility bear interest at variable rates based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a pricing margin. In January 2022, Nevada Power borrowed $200 million under the facility at an initial interest rate of 0.55%. In May 2022, Nevada Power drew the remaining $100 million available under the facility at an initial interest rate of 1.24%. Nevada Power used the proceeds to repay amounts outstanding under its existing secured credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

Future Uses of Cash

Nevada Power has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the use of secured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which Nevada Power has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including Nevada Power's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with Nevada Power and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Prudently incurred expenditures for compliance-related items such as pollution control technologies, replacement generation and associated operating costs are generally incorporated into Nevada Power's regulated retail rates. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisition of existing assets.

Historical and forecasted capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Electric distribution$232 $184 $236 $276 $276 $275 
Electric transmission35 57 110 100 333 427 
Solar generation— 85 144 
Electric battery storage— — 271 — — 
Other188 200 323 512 342 150 
Total$455 $449 $762 $1,303 $953 $853 

Nevada Power received PUCN approval through its recent IRP filings for an increase in solar generation and electric transmission and has included estimates from its IRP filings in its forecast capital expenditures for 2023 through 2025. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. Nevada Power's historical and forecast capital expenditures include the following:

Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Growth projects primarily relate to the Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Operating expenditures consist of routine expenditures for transmission and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.
316


Solar generation includes a growth project consisting of a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2023.
Electric battery storage includes two growth projects consisting of a 100-MW battery energy storage system co-located with a 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2023. The second project is a 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2023.
Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of turbine upgrades at several generating facilities, routine expenditures for generation, other operating projects and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.

Material Cash Requirements

Nevada Power has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise primarily from long- and short-term debt (refer to Notes 7 and 8), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 5), purchased electricity contracts (refer to Note 14), fuel contracts (refer to Note 14), construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7 and Note 14) and AROs (refer to Note 11). Refer to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information.

Nevada Power has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $2.4 billion on long-term debt, including $152 million due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters

Nevada Power is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding Nevada Power's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

Nevada Power is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact Nevada Power's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. Nevada Power believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and Nevada Power is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt of Nevada Power is rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of Nevada Power's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.

Nevada Power has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. Nevada Power's secured revolving credit facility does not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon its availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facility are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.

317


In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, the applicable credit ratings obtained from recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2022, Nevada Power would have been required to post $51 million of additional collateral. Nevada Power's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors.

Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where Nevada Power operates has not had a significant impact on Nevada Power's consolidated financial results. Nevada Power operates under a cost-of-service based rate-setting structure administered by the PUCN and the FERC. Under this rate-setting structure, Nevada Power is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation after Nevada Power experiences cost increases. Fuel and purchase power costs are recovered through a balancing account, minimizing the impact of inflation related to these costs. Nevada Power attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of periodic rate adjustments for fuel and energy costs, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by Nevada Power's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with Nevada Power's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Nevada Power's Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Nevada Power prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Nevada Power defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

Nevada Power continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Nevada Power's ability to recover its costs. Nevada Power believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $1.3 billion and total regulatory liabilities were $1.1 billion as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Nevada Power's Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's regulatory assets and liabilities.

318


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Nevada Power evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the purposes of impairment analysis, requires the exercise of judgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of fair value or the recoverable amount of an asset may include significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect Nevada Power's results of operations.

Income Taxes

In determining Nevada Power's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by Nevada Power's various regulatory commissions. Nevada Power's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Nevada Power recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Nevada Power's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, Nevada Power believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on Nevada Power's consolidated financial results. Refer to Nevada Power's Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's income taxes.

It is probable that Nevada Power will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property related basis differences and other various differences on to its customers. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $560 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue

Revenue is recognized as electricity is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since their last billing is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $143 million as of December 31, 2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month when actual revenue is recorded.

Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. Nevada Power's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which Nevada Power transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with Nevada Power's business activities. Nevada Power has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Nevada Power's contracts accounted for as derivatives.

319


Commodity Price Risk

Nevada Power is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Nevada Power is principally exposed to electricity and natural gas market fluctuations primarily through Nevada Power's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Nevada Power's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power does not engage in proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Nevada Power uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Nevada Power does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. Nevada Power's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates through its deferred energy mechanism, which is subject to disallowance and regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.

The table that follows summarizes Nevada Power's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worse case scenarios (dollars in millions).

Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(52)$(23)$(81)
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(113)$(93)$(133)

Nevada Power's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts are recoverable from customers in regulated rates and therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose Nevada Power to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a net regulatory asset of $52 million and $113 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $52 million and $113 million, respectively. The settled cost of these commodity derivative contracts is generally included in regulated rates.

Interest Rate Risk

Nevada Power is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, Nevada Power's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose Nevada Power to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Nevada Power were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of Nevada Power's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 7 and 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of Nevada Power's short- and long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power had short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $300 million and $180 million, respectively, that expose Nevada Power to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on Nevada Power's annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.
320



Credit Risk

Nevada Power is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Nevada Power's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Nevada Power analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Nevada Power enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Nevada Power exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

As of December 31, 2022, Nevada Power's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions were not material, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral.

321


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

322


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Nevada Power Company

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Nevada Power Company and subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nevada Power as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of Nevada Power's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Nevada Power's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Nevada Power in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Nevada Power is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Nevada Power's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Nevada Power is subject to rate regulation by a state public service commission as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where Nevada Power operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

323


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow Nevada Power an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While Nevada Power Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit Nevada Power's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated Nevada Power's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected Nevada Power's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.


/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 24, 2023

We have served as Nevada Power's auditor since 1987.

324


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions, except share data)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$43 $33 
Trade receivables, net388 227 
Note receivable from affiliate100 — 
Inventories93 64 
Regulatory assets666 291 
Other current assets89 86 
Total current assets1,379 701 
Property, plant and equipment, net7,406 6,891 
Regulatory assets628 728 
Other assets388 432 
Total assets$9,801 $8,752 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$422 $242 
Accrued interest40 32 
Accrued property, income and other taxes32 29 
Short-term debt— 180 
Regulatory liabilities45 49 
Customer deposits51 44 
Derivative contracts51 55 
Other current liabilities49 62 
Total current liabilities690 693 
Long-term debt3,195 2,499 
Finance lease obligations295 310 
Regulatory liabilities1,093 1,100 
Deferred income taxes875 782 
Other long-term liabilities299 338 
Total liabilities6,447 5,722 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholder's equity:
Common stock - $1.00 stated value, 1,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital2,333 2,308 
Retained earnings1,022 724 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(1)(2)
Total shareholder's equity3,354 3,030 
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$9,801 $8,752 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
325


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue$2,630 $2,139 $1,998 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy1,427 939 816 
Operations and maintenance303 301 299 
Depreciation and amortization417 406 361 
Property and other taxes53 48 47 
Total operating expenses2,200 1,694 1,523 
Operating income430 445 475 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(165)(153)(162)
Capitalized interest
Allowance for equity funds11 
Interest and dividend income47 20 10 
Other, net18 
Total other income (expense)(96)(105)(133)
Income before income tax expense334 340 342 
Income tax expense36 37 47 
Net income$298 $303 $295 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

326


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions, except shares)
Accumulated
OtherOtherTotal
Common StockPaid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholder's
SharesAmountCapitalEarningsLoss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 20191,000 $— $2,308 $493 $(4)$2,797 
Net income— — — 295 — 295 
Dividends declared— — — (155)— (155)
Other equity transactions— — — 
Balance, December 31, 20201,000 — 2,308 634 (3)2,939 
Net income— — — 303 — 303 
Dividends declared— — — (213)— (213)
Other equity transactions— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20211,000 — 2,308 724 (2)3,030 
Net income— — — 298 — 298 
Contributions— — 25 — — 25 
Other equity transactions— — — — 
Balance, December 31, 20221,000 $— $2,333 $1,022 $(1)$3,354 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

327


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$298 $303 $295 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization417 406 361 
Allowance for equity funds(11)(7)(7)
Deferred energy(541)(245)(44)
Amortization of deferred energy160 11 (41)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(15)(19)(42)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits49 — (10)
Other, net— 
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(178)45 
Inventories(29)(7)
Accrued property, income and other taxes21 (18)
Accounts payable and other liabilities176 63 (90)
Net cash flows from operating activities355 505 467 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(762)(449)(455)
Proceeds from sale of assets— — 26 
Issuance of affiliate note receivable(100)— — 
Other, net— — 
Net cash flows from investing activities(862)(447)(429)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt694 — 718 
Repayments of long-term debt— — (575)
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt(180)180 — 
Dividends paid— (213)(155)
Contributions from parent25 — — 
Other, net(17)(16)(15)
Net cash flows from financing activities522 (49)(27)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents15 11 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period45 36 25 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$60 $45 $36 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

328


NEVADA POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)    Organization and Operations

Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power"), is a wholly owned subsidiary of NV Energy, Inc. ("NV Energy"), a holding company that also owns Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific") and certain other subsidiaries. Nevada Power is a U.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial and industrial customers primarily in Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson and adjoining areas. NV Energy is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"). BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Nevada Power and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Nevada Power prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Nevada Power defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

329


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of funds restricted by the PUCN for a certain renewable energy contract. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):
As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$43 $33 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents included in other current assets17 12 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$60 $45 

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on Nevada Power's assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to Nevada Power by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, Nevada Power primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, Nevada Power may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. Nevada Power also has the ability to assess deposits on customers who have delayed payments or who are deemed to be a credit risk. The changes in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$18 $19 $15 
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net14 13 13 
Write-offs, net(12)(14)(9)
Ending balance$20 $18 $19 

Derivatives

Nevada Power employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.

Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked‑to‑market and settled amounts are recognized as cost of fuel, energy and capacity on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For Nevada Power's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.

330


Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of materials and supplies totaling $93 million and $64 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The cost is determined using the average cost method. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and are expensed or capitalized to construction work in process, as appropriate, when used.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Nevada Power capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. The cost of repairs and minor replacements are charged to expense when incurred with the exception of costs for generation plant maintenance under certain long-term service agreements. Costs under these agreements are expensed straight-line over the term of the agreements as approved by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN").

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by Nevada Power's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by Nevada Power to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as a non-current regulatory liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

Generally when Nevada Power retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated using the composite method, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings with the exception of material gains or losses on regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated on a straight-line basis, which is then recorded to a regulatory asset or liability.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, are capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The rate applied to construction costs is the lower of the PUCN allowed rate of return and rates computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, Nevada Power is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets. Nevada Power's AFUDC rate used during 2022 and 2021 was 6.55% and 7.14%, respectively.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Nevada Power recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. Nevada Power's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The costs are not recovered in rates until the work has been completed.

331


Impairment

Nevada Power evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

Leases

Nevada Power has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for land, generating facilities, vehicles and office equipment and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities, office space and vehicles. These leases generally require Nevada Power to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Nevada Power does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating Nevada Power is reasonably certain to exercise the option. Nevada Power's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

Nevada Power's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

Nevada Power's operating and right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

Nevada Power uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which Nevada Power expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Nevada Power records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Substantially all of Nevada Power's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission and distribution and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of amounts not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 842, "Leases."

Revenue recognized is equal to what Nevada Power has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Nevada Power's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $143 million and $107 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued. In addition, Nevada Power has recognized contract assets of $4 million and $6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, due to Nevada Power's performance on certain contracts.
332



Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and financing costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes

Berkshire Hathaway includes Nevada Power in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, Nevada Power's provision for income taxes has been computed on a separate return basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of other comprehensive income ("OCI") are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with certain property‑related basis differences and other various differences that Nevada Power deems probable to be passed on to its customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.

Nevada Power recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Nevada Power's unrecognized tax benefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Segment Information

Nevada Power currently has one segment, which includes its regulated electric utility operations.

(3)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility plant:
Generation30 - 55 years$3,977 $3,793 
Transmission45 - 70 years1,562 1,503 
Distribution20 - 65 years4,134 3,920 
General and intangible plant5 - 65 years871 836 
Utility plant10,544 10,052 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(3,624)(3,406)
Utility plant, net6,920 6,646 
Nonregulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization45 years
6,921 6,647 
Construction work-in-progress485 244 
Property, plant and equipment, net$7,406 $6,891 

333


Almost all of Nevada Power's plant is subject to the ratemaking jurisdiction of the PUCN and the FERC. Nevada Power's depreciation and amortization expense, as authorized by the PUCN, stated as a percentage of the depreciable property balances as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 was 3.1%, 3.2%, and 3.1%, respectively. Nevada Power is required to file a utility plant depreciation study every six years as a companion filing with the triennial general rate review filings. The most recent study was filed in 2017.

Construction work-in-progress is primarily related to the construction of regulated assets.

(4)    Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements, Nevada Power, as tenants in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation and transmission facilities. Nevada Power accounts for its proportionate share of each facility and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include Nevada Power's share of the expenses of these facilities.

The amounts shown in the table below represent Nevada Power's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):
NevadaConstruction
Power'sUtilityAccumulatedWork-in-
SharePlantDepreciationProgress
Navajo Generating Station(1)
11 %$$$— 
ON Line Transmission Line19 121 26 
Other transmission facilitiesVarious56 27 — 
Total$178 $57 $

(1)Represents Nevada Power's proportionate share of capitalized asset retirement costs to retire the Navajo Generating Station, which was shut down in November 2019.

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$$10 
Finance leases303 326 
Total right-of-use assets$312 $336 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$11 $13 
Finance leases313 336 
Total lease liabilities$324 $349 

334


The following table summarizes Nevada Power's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Variable$369 $449 $434 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization14 13 12 
Interest27 28 29 
Total lease costs$412 $492 $478 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases4.85.76.5
Finance leases29.128.728.7
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases4.5 %4.5 %4.5 %
Finance leases8.6 %8.6 %8.6 %

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's supplemental cash flow information relating to leases for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(3)$(3)$(3)
Operating cash flows from finance leases(28)(29)(34)
Financing cash flows from finance leases(17)(16)(15)
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases$— $— $
Finance leases

335


Nevada Power has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$44 $46 
202444 47 
202543 46 
202644 47 
202742 44 
Thereafter— 414 414 
Total undiscounted lease payments13 631 644 
Less - amounts representing interest(2)(318)(320)
Lease liabilities$11 $313 $324 

Operating and Finance Lease Obligations

Nevada Power's lease obligation primarily consists of a transmission line, One Nevada Transmission Line ("ON Line"), which was placed in-service on December 31, 2013. Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific, collectively the ("Nevada Utilities"), entered into a long-term transmission use agreement, in which the Nevada Utilities have a 25% interest and Great Basin Transmission South, LLC has a 75% interest. The Nevada Utilities' share of the long-term transmission use agreement and ownership interest is split at 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, previously split 95% for Nevada Power and 5% for Sierra Pacific. In December 2019, the PUCN ordered the Nevada Utilities to complete the necessary procedures to change the ownership split to 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, effective January 1, 2020. In August 2020, the FERC approved the amended agreement between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC that reallocated the PUCN-approved ownership percentage change from Nevada Power to Sierra Pacific. The term of the lease is 41 years with the agreement ending December 31, 2054. Total ON Line finance lease obligations of $276 million and $286 million were included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. See Note 2 for further discussion of Nevada Power's other lease obligations.

(6)    Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. Nevada Power's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred energy costs1 year654 273 
Decommissioning costs3 years116 169 
Merger costs from 1999 merger22 years105 110 
Unrealized loss on regulated derivative contracts1 year75 117 
Asset retirement obligations5 years69 73 
Deferred operating costs13 years67 93 
OtherVarious208 184 
Total regulatory assets$1,294 $1,019 
Reflected as:
Current assets$666 $291 
Noncurrent assets628 728 
Total regulatory assets$1,294 $1,019 

336


Nevada Power had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $320 million and $371 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The regulatory assets not earning a return on investment primarily consist of merger costs from the 1999 merger, AROs, deferred operating costs, a portion of the employee benefit plans, losses on reacquired debt and deferred energy costs.

Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent amounts that are expected to be returned to customers in future periods. Nevada Power's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred income taxes(1)
Various$560 $603 
Cost of removal(2)
31 years358 348 
Earning sharing mechanism4 years114 73 
OtherVarious106 125 
Total regulatory liabilities$1,138 $1,149 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$45 $49 
Noncurrent liabilities1,093 1,100 
Total regulatory liabilities$1,138 $1,149 

(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices.

Deferred Energy

Nevada statutes permit regulated utilities to adopt deferred energy accounting procedures. The intent of these procedures is to ease the effect on customers of fluctuations in the cost of purchased natural gas, fuel and electricity and are subject to annual prudency review by the PUCN. Under deferred energy accounting, to the extent actual fuel and purchased power costs exceed fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates that excess is not recorded as a current expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations but rather is deferred and recorded as a regulatory asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and would be included in the table above as deferred energy costs. Conversely, a regulatory liability is recorded to the extent fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates exceed actual fuel and purchased power costs and is included in the table above as deferred energy costs. These excess amounts are reflected in quarterly adjustments to rates and recorded as cost of fuel, energy and capacity in future time periods.


337


(7)Short-term Debt and Credit Facilities

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's availability under its credit facilities as of December 31 (in millions):

20222021
Credit facilities$400 $400 
Short-term debt— (180)
Net credit facilities$400 $220 

Nevada Power has a $400 million secured credit facility expiring in June 2025 with an unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes and provide for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a spread that varies based on Nevada Power's credit ratings for its senior secured long‑term debt securities. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power had borrowings of $— million and $180 million, respectively, outstanding under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding was —% and 0.86%, respectively. Amounts due under Nevada Power's credit facility are collateralized by Nevada Power's general and refunding mortgage bonds. The credit facility requires Nevada Power's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.


As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power had $— million and $15 million, respectively, of a fully available letter of credit issued under committed arrangements in support of certain transactions required by a third party and has provisions that automatically extend the annual expiration date for an additional year unless the issuing bank elects not to renew the letter of credit prior to the expiration date.

(8)    Long-term Debt

Nevada Power's long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
Par Value20222021
General and refunding mortgage securities:
3.700% Series CC, due 2029$500 $497 $497 
2.400% Series DD, due 2030425 422 422 
6.650% Series N, due 2036367 360 359 
6.750% Series R, due 2037349 346 346 
5.375% Series X, due 2040250 248 248 
5.450% Series Y, due 2041250 239 239 
3.125% Series EE, due 2050300 298 297 
5.900% Series GG, due 2053400 394 — 
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:
Fixed-rate series:
1.875% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017A, due 2032(1)
40 39 39 
1.650% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017, due 2036(1)
40 39 39 
1.650% Pollution Control Bonds Series 2017B, due 2039(1)
13 13 13 
Variable-rate 4.821% Term Loan, due 2024(2)
300 300 — 
Total long-term debt$3,234 $3,195 $2,499 
Reflected as:
Total long-term debt$3,195 $2,499 

(1)Subject to mandatory purchase by Nevada Power in March 2023 at which date the interest rate may be adjusted.
(2)Amounts borrowed under the facility bear interest at variable rates based on SOFR or a base rate, at Nevada Power's option, plus a pricing margin.

338


Annual Payment on Long-Term Debt

The annual repayments of long-term debt for the years beginning January 1, 2023 and thereafter, are as follows (in millions):
2024$300 
2028 and thereafter2,934 
Total3,234 
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost(39)
Total$3,195 

The issuance of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities by Nevada Power is subject to PUCN approval and is limited by available property and other provisions of the mortgage indentures. As of December 31, 2022, approximately $9.8 billion (based on original cost) of Nevada Power's property was subject to the liens of the mortgages.

(9)    Income Taxes

Income tax expense consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current – Federal$(13)$37 $57 
Deferred – Federal49 — (10)
Total income tax expense$36 $37 $47 

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Effects of ratemaking(11)(11)(8)
Other
Effective income tax rate11 %11 %14 %

The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
 20222021
Deferred income tax assets:  
Regulatory liabilities$186 $195 
Operating and finance leases68 73 
Customer advances27 25 
Unamortized contract value20 25 
Other
Total deferred income tax assets310 326 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property related items(821)(800)
Regulatory assets(273)(204)
Operating and finance leases(65)(70)
Other(26)(34)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(1,185)(1,108)
Net deferred income tax liability$(875)$(782)

339


The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of Nevada Power's income tax return through the short year ended December 31, 2013. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, may not preclude the U.S. Internal Revenue Service from adjusting the federal net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans

Nevada Power is a participant in benefit plans sponsored by NV Energy. The NV Energy Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan ("Qualified Pension Plan") and a supplemental executive retirement plan and a restoration plan (collectively, "Non‑Qualified Pension Plans") that provide pension benefits for eligible employees. The NV Energy Comprehensive Welfare Benefit and Cafeteria Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Plans") on behalf of Nevada Power. Nevada Power did not make any contributions to the Qualified Pension Plan for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power contributed $1 million to the Non-Qualified Pension Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power did not make any contributions to the Other Postretirement Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Amounts attributable to Nevada Power were allocated from NV Energy based upon the current, or in the case of retirees, previous, employment location. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates. Net periodic benefit costs not included in regulated rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net.

Amounts receivable from (payable to) NV Energy are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Qualified Pension Plan -
Other non-current assets$27 $42 
Non-Qualified Pension Plans:
Other current liabilities(1)(1)
Other long-term liabilities(6)(8)
Other Postretirement Plans -
Other non-current assets

(11)    Asset Retirement Obligations

Nevada Power estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.

Nevada Power does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $358 million and $348 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The following table presents Nevada Power's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Waste water remediation$31 $37 
Evaporative ponds and dry ash landfills14 13 
Solar-powered generating facilities
Other11 15 
Total asset retirement obligations$59 $68 

340


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Nevada Power's ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$68 $72 
Change in estimated costs— 
Retirements(16)(6)
Accretion
Ending balance$59 $68 
Reflected as:
Other current liabilities$16 $19 
Other long-term liabilities43 49 
$59 $68 

In 2008, Nevada Power signed an administrative order of consent as owner and operator of Reid Gardner Generating Station Unit Nos. 1, 2 and 3 and as co-owner and operating agent of Unit No. 4. Based on the administrative order of consent, Nevada Power recorded estimated AROs and capital remediation costs. However, actual costs of work under the administrative order of consent may vary significantly once the scope of work is defined and additional site characterization has been completed. In connection with the termination of the co-ownership arrangement, effective October 22, 2013, between Nevada Power and California Department of Water Resources ("CDWR") for the Reid Gardner Generating Station Unit No. 4, Nevada Power and CDWR entered into a cost-sharing agreement that sets forth how the parties will jointly share in costs associated with all investigation, characterization and, if necessary, remedial activities as required under the administrative order of consent.

Certain of Nevada Power's decommissioning and reclamation obligations relate to jointly-owned facilities, and as such, Nevada Power is committed to pay a proportionate share of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, the respective subsidiary may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. Management has identified legal obligations to retire generation plant assets specified in land leases for Nevada Power's jointly-owned Navajo Generating Station, retired in November 2019, and the Higgins Generating Station. Provisions of the lease require the lessees to remove the facilities upon request of the lessors at the expiration of the leases. Nevada Power's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

(12)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

Nevada Power is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Nevada Power is principally exposed to electricity and natural gas market fluctuations primarily through Nevada Power's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Nevada Power's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Nevada Power does not engage in proprietary trading activities.

Nevada Power has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Nevada Power uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Nevada Power manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, Nevada Power may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate Nevada Power's exposure to interest rate risk. Nevada Power does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in Nevada Power's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 13 for additional information on derivative contracts.

341


The following table, which excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases and normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair value of Nevada Power's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

Derivative
OtherContracts -Other
CurrentCurrentLong-term
AssetsLiabilitiesLiabilitiesTotal
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts (1):
Commodity assets$23 $— $— $23 
Commodity liabilities— (51)(24)(75)
Total derivative - net basis$23 $(51)$(24)$(52)
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (55)(62)(117)
Total derivative - net basis$$(55)$(62)$(113)

(1)Nevada Power's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are included in regulated rates. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a regulatory asset of $52 million and $113 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $52 million and $113 million, respectively.

Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
Unit of
Measure20222021
Electricity purchasesMegawatt hours
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms109 119 

Credit Risk

Nevada Power is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Nevada Power's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Nevada Power analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Nevada Power enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Nevada Power exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

342


Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels "credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in Nevada Power's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, Nevada Power's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

The aggregate fair value of Nevada Power's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $5 million and $6 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which represents the amount of collateral to be posted if all credit risk related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered. Nevada Power's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation or other factors.

(13)    Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of Nevada Power's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. Nevada Power has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Nevada Power has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect Nevada Power's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. Nevada Power develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

343


The following table presents Nevada Power's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $23 $23 
Money market mutual funds34 — — 34 
Investment funds— — 
$37 $— $23 $60 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(75)$(75)
As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds34 — — 34 
Investment funds— — 
$37 $— $$41 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(117)$(117)

Nevada Power's investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Nevada Power transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, Nevada Power uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent Nevada Power's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. Nevada Power bases its forward price curves upon internally developed models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to markets that are not active. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, Nevada Power uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The model incorporates a mid-market pricing convention (the mid‑point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient for valuing its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value. The determination of the fair value for derivative contracts not only includes counterparty risk, but also the impact of Nevada Power's nonperformance risk on its liabilities, which as of December 31, 2022, had an immaterial impact to the fair value of its derivative contracts. As such, Nevada Power considers its derivative contracts to be valued using Level 3 inputs.

Nevada Power's investments in money market mutual funds and equity securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

344


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Nevada Power's net commodity derivative assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$(113)$15 $(8)
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities(68)(90)(17)
Settlements129 (38)40 
Ending balance$(52)$(113)$15 

Nevada Power's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of Nevada Power's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Nevada Power's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$3,195 $3,114 $2,499 $3,067 

(14)    Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Nevada Power has the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as of December 31, 2022 are as follows (in millions):
202320242025202620272028 and ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$1,149 $485 $357 $360 $349 $2,871 $5,571 
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)60 181 211 211 211 4,148 5,022 
Construction commitments525 77 20 21 10 — 653 
Easements50 64 
Maintenance, service and other contracts30 24 24 19 11 38 146 
Total commitments$1,769 $770 $614 $613 $583 $7,107 $11,456 

Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments

Purchased Power

Nevada Power has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy which have been approved by the PUCN. The expiration of these contracts range from 2023 to 2067. Purchased power includes estimated payments for contracts which meet the definition of a lease and payments are based on the amount of energy expected to be generated. See Note 5 for further discussion of Nevada Power's lease commitments.

Natural Gas

Nevada Power's gas transportation contracts expire from 2027 to 2039 and the gas supply contracts expires from 2023 to 2024.

345


Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments - Not Commercially Operable

Nevada Power has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy in which the facility remains under development. Amounts represent the estimated payments under renewable energy power purchase contracts, which have been approved by the PUCN and are contingent upon the developers obtaining commercial operation and their ability to deliver power.

Construction Commitments

Nevada Power's construction commitments included in the table above relate to firm commitments and include costs associated with a planned 150-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 100 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Clark County, Nevada, a planned 220-MW grid-tied battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the retired Reid Gardner generating station in Clark County, Nevada and certain other generating plant projects.

Easements

Nevada Power has non-cancelable easements for land. Operations and maintenance expense on non-cancelable easements totaled $4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Maintenance, Service and Other Contracts

Nevada Power has long-term service agreements for the performance of maintenance on generation units. Obligation amounts are based on estimated usage. The estimated expiration of these service agreements range from 2023 to 2031.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

Nevada Power is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality, coal ash disposal and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. Nevada Power believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Senate Bill 123

In June 2013, the Nevada State Legislature passed Senate Bill 123 ("SB 123"), which included the retirement of coal plants and replacing the capacity with renewable facilities and other generating facilities. In May 2014, Nevada Power filed its Emissions Reduction and Capacity Replacement Plan ("ERCR Plan") in compliance with SB 123. In July 2015, Nevada Power filed an amendment to its ERCR Plan with the PUCN which was approved in September 2015. In June 2015, the Nevada State Legislature passed Assembly Bill No. 498, which modified the capacity replacement components of SB 123.

In compliance with SB 123, Nevada Power retired 255 MWs of coal-fueled generation in 2019 in addition to the 557 MWs of coal-fueled generation retired in 2017. Consistent with the ERCR Plan, between 2014 and 2016, Nevada Power acquired 536 MWs of natural gas generating resources, executed long-term power purchase agreements for 200 MWs of nameplate renewable energy capacity and constructed a 15-MW solar photovoltaic facility. Nevada Power has the option to acquire 35 MWs of nameplate renewable energy capacity in the future under the ERCR Plan, subject to PUCN approval.

Legal Matters

Nevada Power is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. Nevada Power does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results. Nevada Power is also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties and other costs in substantial amounts.

346


(15)    Revenues from Contracts with Customers

The following table summarizes Nevada Power's Customer Revenue by customer class for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Retail:
Residential$1,440 $1,207 $1,145 
Commercial525 414 384 
Industrial528 386 345 
Other14 14 12 
Total fully bundled2,507 2,021 1,886 
Distribution-only service20 22 24 
Total retail2,527 2,043 1,910 
Wholesale, transmission and other82 74 62 
Total Customer Revenue2,609 2,117 1,972 
Other revenue21 22 26 
Total operating revenue$2,630 $2,139 $1,998 

(16)    Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$121 $115 $115 
Income taxes (refunded) paid$(29)$63 $50 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$98 $53 $32 

(17)    Related Party Transactions

Nevada Power has an intercompany administrative services agreement with BHE and its subsidiaries. Amounts charged to Nevada Power under this agreement, either directly or through NV Energy, totaled $46 million, $30 million and $6 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Amounts charged to Nevada Power in 2022 and 2021 primarily relate to information technology projects billed at a consolidated level and passed through to affiliates.

Kern River Gas Transmission Company, an indirect subsidiary of BHE, provided natural gas transportation and other services to Nevada Power of $49 million, $52 million, $52 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to Kern River Gas Transmission Company of $3 million and $4 million, respectively.

Nevada Power provided electricity and other services to PacifiCorp, an indirect subsidiary of BHE, of $4 million, $3 million and $3 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were no receivables associated with these services as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. PacifiCorp provided electricity and the sale of renewable energy credits to Nevada Power of $— million, $— million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2020, respectively. There were no payables associated with these transactions as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

347


Nevada Power provided electricity to Sierra Pacific of $362 million, $179 million and $106 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Receivables associated with these transactions were $41 million and $13 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Nevada Power purchased electricity from Sierra Pacific of $86 million, $43 million and $34 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Payables associated with these transactions were $5 million and $— million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

Nevada Power incurs intercompany administrative and shared facility costs with NV Energy and Sierra Pacific. These transactions are governed by an intercompany service agreement and are priced at cost. Nevada Power provided services to NV Energy of $3 million, $1 million and $— million for each of the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. NV Energy provided services to Nevada Power of $9 million for the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Nevada Power provided services to Sierra Pacific of $25 million, $25 million and $26 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sierra Pacific provided services to Nevada Power of $16 million, $15 million and $15 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to NV Energy of $51 million and $33 million, respectively. There were no receivables due from NV Energy as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. In November 2022, Nevada Power entered into a $100 million unsecured note with NV Energy receivable upon demand and $100 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Nevada Power's Consolidated Balance Sheets included receivables due from Sierra Pacific of $33 million and $2 million, respectively. There were no payables due to Sierra Pacific as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Nevada Power is party to a tax-sharing agreement with NV Energy and NV Energy is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 federal income taxes receivable from NV Energy were $12 million and $27 million, respectively. Nevada Power received cash refunds of $29 million for federal income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2022 and made cash payments of $63 million and $50 million for federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Certain disbursements for accounts payable and payroll are made by NV Energy on behalf of Nevada Power and reimbursed automatically when settled by the bank. These amounts are recorded as accounts payable at the time of disbursement.

348


Sierra Pacific Power Company and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section
349


Item 7.    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the financial condition and results of operations of Sierra Pacific during the periods included herein. Explanations include management's best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth, usage trends and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Sierra Pacific's historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K. Sierra Pacific's actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

Results of Operations

Overview

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $118 million, a decrease of $6 million, or 5%, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher operations and maintenance expenses, mainly due to higher plant operations and maintenance expenses, lower other, net, mainly due to higher pension expense and lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies, higher depreciation and amortization, primarily due to higher plant in-service, higher interest expense mainly due to higher long-term debt, partially offset by higher electric utility margin and higher interest and dividend income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances. Electric utility margin increased primarily due to higher transmission and wholesale revenue, higher customer volumes and higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals, partially offset by unfavorable price impacts from changes in sales mix. Electric retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.8% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather and unfavorable changes in customer usage. Energy generated decreased 13% for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to lower natural gas- and coal-fueled generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes increased 13% and purchased electricity volumes decreased 5%.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $124 million, an increase of $13 million, or 12%, compared to 2020, primarily due to higher interest and dividend income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances, higher electric utility margin, mainly from price impacts from changes in sales mix and an increase in the average number of customer, primarily from the residential customer class, partially offset by lower revenue recognized due to a favorable regulatory decision and an adjustment to regulatory-related revenue deferrals, higher other, net, mainly due to lower pension expense and higher cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies, higher allowance for equity funds, mainly due to higher construction work-in-progress, higher natural gas utility margin, mainly due to higher commercial usage, and lower interest expense, mainly due to lower carrying charges on regulatory balances, partially offset by higher income tax expense primarily due to higher pretax income, higher depreciation and amortization, mainly from regulatory amortizations and higher plant in-service, and higher operations and maintenance expenses, mainly due to higher plant operations and maintenance expenses and higher legal expenses, offset by lower earnings sharing. Electric retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.9% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable changes in customer usage patterns and the favorable impact of weather. Energy generated decreased 2% for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower natural gas-fueled generation, partially offset by higher coal-fueled generation. Wholesale electricity sales volumes increased 20% and purchased electricity volumes increased 4%.

Non-GAAP Financial Measure

Management utilizes various key financial measures that are prepared in accordance with GAAP, as well as non-GAAP financial measures such as, electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin, to help evaluate results of operations. Electric utility margin is calculated as electric operating revenue less cost of fuel and energy while natural gas utility margin is calculated as natural gas operating revenue less cost of natural gas purchased for resale, which are captions presented on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Sierra Pacific's cost of fuel and energy and cost of natural gas purchased for resale are generally recovered from its retail customers through regulatory recovery mechanisms and, as a result, changes in Sierra Pacific's expenses included in regulatory recovery mechanisms result in comparable changes to revenue. As such, management believes electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin more appropriately and concisely explains profitability rather than a discussion of revenue and cost of sales separately. Management believes the presentation of electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin provides meaningful and valuable insight into the information management considers important to running the business and a measure of comparability to others in the industry.
350


Electric utility margin and natural gas utility margin are not measures calculated in accordance with GAAP and should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating income, which is the most directly comparable financial measure prepared in accordance with GAAP. The following table provides a reconciliation of utility margin to operating income for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021Change20212020Change
Electric utility margin:
Operating revenue$1,025 $848 $177 21 %$848 $738 $110 15 %
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 148 36 407 301 106 35 
Electric utility margin470 441 29 %441 437 %
Natural gas utility margin:
Operating revenue168 117 51 44 %117 116 %
Natural gas purchased for resale111 61 50 82 61 62 (1)(2)
Natural gas utility margin57 56 %56 54 %
Utility margin527 497 30 %497 491 %
Operations and maintenance189 163 26 16 %163 162 %
Depreciation and amortization149 143 143 141 
Property and other taxes24 24 — — 24 23 
Operating income$165 $167 $(2)(1)%$167 $165 $%

351


Electric Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to electric utility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$1,025 $848 $177 21 %$848 $738 $110 15 %
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 148 36 407 301 106 35 
Utility margin$470 $441 $29 %$441 $437 $%
Sales (GWhs):
Residential2,747 2,769 (22)(1)%2,769 2,672 97 %
Commercial3,124 3,056 68 3,056 2,977 79 
Industrial2,867 3,716 (849)(23)3,716 3,544 172 
Other13 15 (2)(13)15 15 — — 
Total fully bundled(1)
8,751 9,556 (805)(8)9,556 9,208 348 
Distribution only service2,757 1,639 1,118 68 1,639 1,670 (31)(2)
Total retail11,508 11,195 313 11,195 10,878 317 
Wholesale741 656 85 13 656 548 108 20 
Total GWhs sold12,249 11,851 398 %11,851 11,426 425 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)371 365 %365 359 %
Average revenue per MWh:
Retail - fully bundled(1)
$106.57 $81.77 $24.80 30 %$81.77 $73.89 $7.88 11 %
Wholesale$75.48 $58.14 $17.34 30 %$58.14 $52.52 $5.62 11 %
Heating degree days4,631 4,494 137 %4,494 4,477 17 — %
Cooling degree days1,353 1,366 (13)(1)%1,366 1,176 190 16 %
Sources of energy (GWhs)(2)(3):
Natural gas4,075 4,712 (637)(14)%4,712 5,219 (507)(10)%
Coal1,077 1,220 (143)(12)1,220 855 365 43 
Renewables(4)
26 31 (5)(16)31 37 (6)(16)
Total energy generated5,178 5,963 (785)(13)5,963 6,111 (148)(2)
Energy purchased4,691 4,960 (269)(5)4,960 4,753 207 
Total9,869 10,923 (1,054)(10)%10,923 10,864 59 %
Average cost of energy per MWh(5):
Energy generated$46.05 $28.84 $17.21 60 %$28.84 $20.12 $8.72 43 %
Energy purchased$67.49 $47.39 $20.10 42 %$47.39 $37.46 $9.93 27 %

(1)    Fully bundled includes sales to customers for combined energy, transmission and distribution services.
(2)    The average cost of energy per MWh and sources of energy excludes -, 2 and 10 GWhs of coal and -, 6 and 31 GWhs of natural gas generated energy that is purchased at cost by related parties for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(3)    GWh amounts are net of energy used by the related generating facilities.
(4)    Includes the Fort Churchill Solar Array which was under lease by Sierra Pacific until it was acquired in December 2021.
(5)    The average cost of energy per MWh includes only the cost of fuel associated with the generating facilities, purchased power and deferrals.
352


Natural Gas Utility Margin

A comparison of key operating results related to natural gas utility margin is as follows for the years ended December 31:
20222021Change20212020Change
Utility margin (in millions):
Operating revenue$168 $117 $51 44 %$117 $116 $%
Natural gas purchased for resale111 61 50 82 61 62 (1)(2)
Utility margin$57 $56 $%$56 $54 $%
Sold (000's Dths):
Residential11,269 10,662 607 %10,662 10,452 210 %
Commercial5,897 5,524 373 5,524 5,148 376 
Industrial2,211 1,981 230 12 1,981 1,826 155 
Total retail19,377 18,167 1,210 %18,167 17,426 741 %
Average number of retail customers (in thousands)180 177 %177 174 %
Average revenue per retail Dth sold$8.67 $6.44 $2.23 35 %$6.44 $6.66 $(0.22)(3)%
Heating degree days4,631 4,494 137 %4,494 4,477 17 — %
Average cost of natural gas per retail Dth sold$5.73 $3.36 $2.37 71 %$3.36 $3.56 $(0.20)(6)%

Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021

Electric utility margin increased $29 million, or 7%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to:
$15 million of higher ON Line temporary rider (offset in operations and maintenance expense) for the recovery of deferred costs for ON Line due to the regulatory-directed reallocation of costs between Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific;
$9 million of higher transmission and wholesale revenue;
$4 million of higher regulatory-related revenue deferrals; and
$1 million of higher electric retail utility margin due to higher customer volumes, offset by unfavorable price impacts from changes in sales mix. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.8% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, offset by the unfavorable impact of weather and unfavorable changes in customer usage.
The increase in electric utility margin was offset by:
$2 million in lower energy efficiency program rates (offset in operations and maintenance expense).

Operations and maintenance increased $26 million, or 16%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher regulatory-approved cost recovery for the ON Line reallocation of $15 million (offset in operating revenue) and higher plant operations and maintenance expenses, partially offset by lower energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue).

Depreciation and amortization increased $6 million, or 4%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher plant in-service.

Interest expense increased $4 million, or 7%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher interest rates and debt.

Interest and dividend income increased $9 million for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher interest income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances.

Other, net decreased $9 million, or 82%, for 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher pension expense and lower cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies.
353



Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

Electric utility margin increased $4 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to:
$10 million of higher electric retail utility margin primarily due to higher retail customer volumes. Retail customer volumes, including distribution only service customers, increased 2.9% primarily due to an increase in the average number of customers, favorable changes in customer usage patterns and the favorable impact of weather, and
$3 million of higher transmission and wholesale revenue.
The increase in electric utility margin was offset by:
$3 million in lower revenue recognized due to a favorable regulatory decision in 2020;
$3 million due to an adjustment to regulatory-related revenue deferrals; and
$2 million due to lower energy efficiency program rates (offset in operations and maintenance expense).

Natural gas utility margin increased $2 million, or 4%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to favorable changes in customer usage patterns.

Operations and maintenance increased $1 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher plant operations and maintenance expenses and higher legal expenses, offset by lower earnings sharing and lower energy efficiency program costs (offset in operating revenue).
Depreciation and amortization increased $2 million, or 1%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to regulatory amortizations and higher plant in-service.

Interest expense decreased $2 million, or 4%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower carrying charges on regulatory
balances.

Allowance for equity funds increased $3 million, or 75%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher construction work-in-progress.

Interest and dividend income increased $5 million for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher interest income, mainly from carrying charges on regulatory balances.

Other, net increased $4 million, or 57%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to lower pension expense and higher cash surrender value of corporate-owned life insurance policies.

Income tax expense increased $3 million, or 20%, for 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to higher pretax income. The effective tax rate was 13% in 2021 and 12% in 2020.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific's total net liquidity was $299 million as follows (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents$49 
Credit facilities(1)
250 
Total net liquidity$299 
Credit facilities:
Maturity dates2025

(1)Refer to Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding Sierra Pacific's credit facility.
354


Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $109 million and $183 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher payments related to fuel and energy costs and the timing of payments for operating costs, partially offset by higher collections from customers.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $183 million and $190 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to the timing of payments for fuel and energy costs, partially offset by higher collections from customers, the timing of payments for operating costs, lower inventory purchases and increased collections of customer advances.

The timing of Sierra Pacific's income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $(351) million and $(300) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to increased capital expenditures. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $(300) million and $(246) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to increased capital expenditures. Refer to "Future Uses of Cash" for further discussion of capital expenditures.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $282 million and $107 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher contributions from NV Energy, Inc. and greater proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, partially offset by higher long-term debt reacquired, higher repayments of short-term debt and higher dividends paid to NV Energy, Inc.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $107 million and $50 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher proceeds from short-term debt and lower dividends paid to NV Energy, Inc., partially offset by lower proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt.

Ability to Issue Debt

Sierra Pacific's ability to issue debt is primarily impacted by its financing authority from the PUCN. As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific has financing authority from the PUCN consisting of the ability to issue long-term and short-term debt securities so long as the total amount of debt outstanding (excluding borrowings under Sierra Pacific's $250 million secured credit facility) does not exceed $1.9 billion and to issue common and preferred stock so long as the total amounts outstanding do not exceed $2.2 billion and $500 million, respectively, as measured at the end of each calendar quarter. Sierra Pacific's revolving credit facility contains a financial maintenance covenant which Sierra Pacific was in compliance with as of December 31, 2022. In addition, certain financing agreements contain covenants which are currently suspended as Sierra Pacific's senior secured debt is rated investment grade. However, if Sierra Pacific's senior secured debt ratings fall below investment grade by either Moody's Investor Service or Standard & Poor's, Sierra Pacific would be subject to limitations under these covenants.

Ability to Issue General and Refunding Mortgage Securities

To the extent Sierra Pacific has the ability to issue debt under the most restrictive covenants in its financing agreements and has financing authority to do so from the PUCN, Sierra Pacific's ability to issue secured debt is limited by the amount of bondable property or retired bonds that can be used to issue debt under Sierra Pacific's indenture.


355


Sierra Pacific's indenture creates a lien on substantially all of Sierra Pacific's properties in Nevada. As of December 31, 2017, $3.92022, $4.9 billion of Sierra Pacific's assets were pledged. Sierra Pacific had the capacity to issue $1.2$2.0 billion of additional general and refunding mortgage securities as of December 31, 20172022 determined on the basis of 70% of net utility property additions. Property additions include plant-in-service and specific assets in construction work-in-progress. The amount of bond capacity listed above does not include eligible property in construction work-in-progress. Sierra Pacific also has the ability to release property from the lien of Sierra Pacific's indenture on the basis of net property additions, cash or retired bonds. To the extent Sierra Pacific releases property from the lien of Sierra Pacific's indenture, it will reduce the amount of securities issuable under the indenture.


Long-Term Debt

In June 2022, Sierra Pacific purchased $60 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Gas & Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016B, due 2036, as required by the bond indenture. Sierra Pacific is holding these bonds and can re-offer them at a future date.

In May 2022, Sierra Pacific issued $250 million of 4.71% General and Refunding Mortgage bonds, Series W, due 2052. The net proceeds were used to repay the outstanding $200 million unsecured loan with NV Energy, Inc., repay amounts outstanding under its existing revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.

In April 2022, Sierra Pacific entered into a $200 million unsecured loan with NV Energy payable upon demand. The net proceeds were used to purchase certain tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations that were subject to mandatory purchase by Sierra Pacific in April 2022. The loan has an underlying variable interest rate based on 30-day U.S. dollar deposits offered on the London Interbank Offered Rate market plus a spread of 0.75%.

In April 2022, Sierra Pacific purchased the following series of bonds that were held by the public: $30 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016C, due 2036; $25 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016D, due 2036; $25 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016E, due 2036; $75 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016F, due 2036; $20 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016G, due 2036; and $30 million of its variable-rate tax-exempt Pollution Control Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2016B, due 2029. Sierra Pacific purchased these bonds as required by the bond indentures. Sierra Pacific is holding these bonds and can re-offer them at a future date.

Future Uses of Cash


Sierra Pacific has available a variety of sources of liquidity and capital resources, both internal and external, including net cash flows from operating activities, public and private debt offerings, the use of secured revolving credit facilities, capital contributions and other sources. These sources are expected to provide funds required for current operations, capital expenditures, debt retirements and other capital requirements. The availability and terms under which Sierra Pacific has access to external financing depends on a variety of factors, including Sierra Pacific's credit ratings, investors' judgment of risk associated with Sierra Pacific and conditions in the overall capital markets, including the condition of the utility industry.

Capital Expenditures


Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; load projections; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital. Prudently incurred expenditures for compliance-related items such as pollution-control technologies, replacement generation and associated operating costs are generally incorporated into Sierra Pacific's regulated retail rates. Expenditures for certain assets may ultimately include acquisition of existing assets.


356


Historical and forecasted capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Electric distribution$128 $96 $113 $125 $112 $269 
Electric transmission60 77 75 45 247 188 
Solar generation— 17 36 — — — 
Electric battery storage— 18 — — 270 196 
Other58 92 127 141 147 116 
Total$246 $300 $351 $311 $776 $769 
 Historical Forecasted
 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020
            
Distribution$86
 $115
 $88
 $81
 $76
 64
Transmission system investment38
 12
 12
 11
 47
 15
Other128
 67
 86
 104
 101
 80
Total$252
 $194
 $186
 $196
 $224
 $159


Sierra Pacific received PUCN approval through its recent IRP filings for an increase in solar generation and electric transmission and has included estimates from its latest IRP filing in its forecast capital expenditures for 2022 through 2024. These estimates are likely to change as a result of the RFP process. Sierra Pacific's historical and forecast capital expenditures include investments thatthe following:
Electric distribution includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of routine expenditures for distribution needed to serve existing and expected demand.
Electric transmission includes both growth projects and operating expenditures. Growth projects primarily relate to operating projects thatthe Nevada Utilities' Greenlink Nevada transmission expansion program. In this project, the company has received approval from the PUCN to build a 350-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink West, connecting the Ft. Churchill substation to the Northwest substation to the Harry Allen substation; a 235-mile, 525-kV transmission line, known as Greenlink North, connecting the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substation; a 46-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Mira Loma substations; and a 38-mile, 345-kV transmission line from the new Ft. Churchill substation to the Robinson Summit substations. Operating expenditures consist of routine expenditures for transmission distribution, generation and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.

Solar generation includes solar photovoltaic panels procured for future growth projects.
Contractual ObligationsElectric battery storage includes a growth projects consisting of a 200-MW battery energy storage system that will be developed on the site of the Valmy generating station in Humboldt County, Nevada. Commercial operation is expected by the end of 2025.

Other includes both growth projects and operating expenditures consisting of turbine upgrades at the Tracy generating facility, routine expenditures for generation, other operating projects and other infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.

Material Cash Requirements

Sierra Pacific has contractual cash obligationsrequirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition. The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's material contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2017 (in millions):
 Payments Due by Periods
 2018 2019 - 2020 2021 - 2022 2023 and Thereafter Total
Long-term debt$
 $
 $
 $1,121
 $1,121
Interest payments on long-term debt(1)
40
 81
 81
 351
 553
Capital leases, including interest(2)
3
 4
 2
 8
 17
ON Line financial lease, including interest(2)
2
 4
 5
 38
 49
Fuel and capacity contract commitments(1)
200
 269
 145
 515
 1,129
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)(1)

 24
 44
 590
 658
Operating leases and easements(1)
4
 8
 5
 54
 71
Asset retirement obligations
 
 
 14
 14
Maintenance, service and other contracts(1)
6
 12
 12
 12
 42
Total contractual cash obligations$255
 $402
 $294
 $2,703
 $3,654

(1)Not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)Interest is not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


Sierra Pacific has other types of commitmentscondition that arise primarily from unused lines of credit, letters of credit or relatelong- and short-term debt (refer to Notes 7 and 8), operating and financing leases (refer to Note 5), purchased electricity contracts (refer to Note 14), fuel contracts (refer to Note 14), construction and other development costs (Liquidity(refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7 and Note 6), uncertain tax positions (Note 9)14) and asset retirement obligations (Note 12), which have not been included in the above table because the amount and timing of the cash payments are not certain.AROs (refer to Note 11). Refer where applicable, to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K10-K for additional information.


Sierra Pacific has cash requirements relating to interest payments of $647 million on long-term debt, including $48 million due in 2023.

Regulatory Matters


Sierra Pacific is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussioninformation regarding Sierra Pacific's general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.


357


Environmental Laws and Regulations


Sierra Pacific is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, RPS,climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact Sierra Pacific's current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. Sierra Pacific believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and Sierra Pacific is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results. Refer to "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for discussion of Sierra Pacific's forecasted environmental-related capital expenditures.


Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for additional informationfurther discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" for Sierra Pacific's forecasted environmental-related capital expenditures.regulations.


Collateral and Contingent Features


Debt of Sierra Pacific is rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of Sierra Pacific's ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.


Sierra Pacific has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments. Sierra Pacific's secured revolving credit facility does not require the maintenance of a minimum credit rating level in order to draw upon its availability. However, commitment fees and interest rates under the credit facility are tied to credit ratings and increase or decrease when the ratings change. A ratings downgrade could also increase the future cost of commercial paper, short- and long-term debt issuances or new credit facilities.


In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the three recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance," or in some cases terminate the contract, in the event of a material adverse change in creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the applicable credit ratings obtained from the three recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade. If all credit-risk-related contingent features or adequate assurance provisions for these agreements had been triggered as of December 31, 2017,2022, Sierra Pacific would not have been required to post $15 million of additional collateral. Sierra Pacific's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation, or other factors.



Inflation


Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where Sierra Pacific operates has not had a significant impact on Sierra Pacific's consolidated financial results. Sierra Pacific operates under a cost-of-service based raterate-setting structure administered by the PUCN and the FERC. Under this raterate-setting structure, Sierra Pacific is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation after Sierra Pacific experiences cost increases. Fuel and purchase power costs are recovered through a balancing account, minimizing the impact of inflation related to these costs. Sierra Pacific attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations through the use of periodic rate adjustments for fuel and energy costs, by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.


New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting Sierra Pacific, refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Critical Accounting Estimates


Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by Sierra Pacific's methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with Sierra Pacific's Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Sierra Pacific's Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

358


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


Sierra Pacific prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Sierra Pacific defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.


Sierra Pacific continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Sierra Pacific's ability to recover its costs. Sierra Pacific believes theits application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $332$611 million and total regulatory liabilities were $500$455 million as of December 31, 2017.2022. Refer to Sierra Pacific's Note 56 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's regulatory assets and liabilities.


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


Sierra Pacific evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, as of December 31, 2017, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.



The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the asset that are used in thepurposes of impairment analysis, requires judgment regarding what Sierra Pacific would expect to recover from the future useexercise of the asset. Changes in judgmentjudgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of the fair value or the recoverable amount of thean asset may result frominclude significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, or the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, load growth, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect Sierra Pacific's results of operations.


Income Taxes


In determining Sierra Pacific's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by Sierra Pacific's various regulatory jurisdictions.commissions. Sierra Pacific's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Sierra Pacific recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Sierra Pacific's federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, Sierra Pacific believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations if any, is not expected to have a material impact on Sierra Pacific's consolidated financial results. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Refer to Sierra Pacific's Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's income taxes.


It is probable that Sierra Pacific is probable towill pass income tax benefitsbenefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to its customers. As of December 31, 2017,2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $264$223 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.


359


Revenue Recognition - Unbilled Revenue


Revenue is recognized as electricity or natural gas is delivered or services are provided. The determination of customer billings is based on a systematic reading of meters. At the end of each month, energy provided to customers since their last billing is estimated, and the corresponding unbilled revenue is recorded. Unbilled revenue was $62$94 million as of December 31, 2017.2022. Factors that can impact the estimate of unbilled energy include, but are not limited to, seasonal weather patterns, total volumes supplied to the system, line losses, economic impacts and composition of sales among customer classes. Estimates are reversed in the following month when actual revenue is recorded.


Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk


Sierra Pacific's Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. Sierra Pacific's significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which Sierra Pacific transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with Sierra Pacific's business activities. Sierra Pacific has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Sierra Pacific's contracts accounted for as derivatives.



Commodity Price Risk


Sierra Pacific is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Sierra Pacific is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Sierra Pacific's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Sierra Pacific's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity, wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold, and natural gas supply for retail customers. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific does not engage in proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Sierra Pacific uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Sierra Pacific does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. Sierra Pacific's exposure to commodity price risk is generally limited by its ability to include commodity costs in regulated rates through its deferred energy mechanism, which is subject to disallowance and regulatory lag that occurs between the time the costs are incurred and when the costs are included in regulated rates, as well as the impact of any customer sharing resulting from cost adjustment mechanisms.


The table that follows summarizes Sierra Pacific's price risk on commodity contracts accounted for as derivatives and shows the effects of a hypothetical 10% increase and 10% decrease in forward market prices by the expected volumes for these contracts as of that date. The selected hypothetical change does not reflect what could be considered the best or worse case scenarios (dollars in millions).

Fair Value -Estimated Fair Value after
Net AssetHypothetical Change in Price
(Liability)10% increase10% decrease
As of December 31, 2022:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(13)$(3)$(23)
As of December 31, 2021:
Total commodity derivative contracts$(33)$(26)$(40)

Sierra Pacific's commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedging contracts are recoverable from customers in regulated rates and therefore, net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on commodity derivative contracts do not expose Sierra Pacific to earnings volatility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a net regulatory asset of $13 million and $33 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $13 million and $33 million, respectively. The settled cost of these commodity derivative contracts is generally included in regulated rates.

360


Interest Rate Risk


Sierra Pacific is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, Sierra Pacific's fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose Sierra Pacific to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Sierra Pacific were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of Sierra Pacific's short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Notes 67 and 78 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of Sierra Pacific's short- and long-term debt.


As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, Sierra Pacific had short- and long-termshort-term variable-rate obligations totaling $80$— million and $159 million, respectively, that expose Sierra Pacific to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on Sierra Pacific's consolidated annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.


Credit Risk


Sierra Pacific is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Sierra Pacific's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Sierra Pacific analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Sierra Pacific enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Sierra Pacific exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.


As of December 31, 2017,2022, Sierra Pacific's aggregate credit exposure from energy related transactions were not material, based on settlement and mark-to-market exposures, net of collateral.



361


Item 8.    Financial Statements and Supplementary Data




362


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM




To the Shareholder and Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Sierra Pacific Power Company
Las Vegas, Nevada


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Sierra Pacific Power Company and subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific") as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”"financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Sierra Pacific as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of Sierra Pacific's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Sierra Pacific’sPacific's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Sierra Pacific in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Sierra Pacific is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Sierra Pacific's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Sierra Pacific is subject to rate regulation by a state public service commission as well as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (collectively, the "Commissions"), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of electric and natural gas companies in the respective service territories where Sierra Pacific operates. Management has determined it meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economic effects of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

363


Regulated rates are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes. Rates are determined, approved, and established based on a cost-of-service basis, which is designed to allow Sierra Pacific an opportunity to recover its prudently incurred costs of providing services and to earn a reasonable return on its invested capital. Regulatory decisions can have an effect on the recovery of costs, the rate of return earned on investment, and the timing and amount of assets to be recovered by rates. While Sierra Pacific Power Company has indicated it expects to recover costs from customers through regulated rates, there is a risk that changes to the Commissions' approach to setting rates or other regulatory actions could limit Sierra Pacific's ability to recover its costs.

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the Commissions included the following, among others:
We evaluated Sierra Pacific's disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected Sierra Pacific's filings with the Commissions and the filings with the Commissions by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the Commissions' treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inquired of management to identify projects that are designed to replace assets that may be retired prior to the end of the useful life. We inspected minutes of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with the Commissions to identify any evidence that may contradict management's assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.


/s/    Deloitte & Touche LLP

Las Vegas, Nevada
February 23, 201824, 2023

We have served as Sierra Pacific’sPacific's auditor since 1996.



364


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions, except share data)

As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $10 
Trade receivables, net175 128 
Inventories79 65 
Regulatory assets357 177 
Other current assets50 35 
Total current assets710 415 
Property, plant and equipment, net3,587 3,340 
Regulatory assets254 263 
Other assets181 205 
Total assets$4,732 $4,223 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$224 $147 
Note payable to affiliate70 — 
Short-term debt— 159 
Current portion of long-term debt250 — 
Other current liabilities108 108 
Total current liabilities652 414 
Long-term debt898 1,164 
Finance lease obligations100 106 
Regulatory liabilities436 444 
Deferred income taxes445 402 
Other long-term liabilities153 158 
Total liabilities2,684 2,688 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Shareholder's equity:
Common stock - $3.75 stated value, 20,000,000 shares authorized and 1,000 issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital1,576 1,111 
Retained earnings473 425 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(1)(1)
Total shareholder's equity2,048 1,535 
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$4,732 $4,223 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



365
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS
    
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$4
 $55
Accounts receivable, net112
 117
Inventories49
 45
Regulatory assets32
 25
Other current assets17
 13
Total current assets214
 255
    
Property, plant and equipment, net2,892
 2,822
Regulatory assets300
 410
Other assets7
 6
    
Total assets$3,413
 $3,493
    
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$92
 $146
Accrued interest14
 14
Accrued property, income and other taxes10
 10
Regulatory liabilities19
 69
Current portion of long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations2
 1
Customer deposits
15
 16
Other current liabilities12
 12
Total current liabilities164
 268
    
Long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations1,152
 1,152
Regulatory liabilities481
 221
Deferred income taxes330
 617
Other long-term liabilities114
 127
Total liabilities2,241
 2,385
    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)   
    
Shareholder's equity:   
Common stock - $3.75 stated value, 20,000,000 shares authorized and 1,000 issued and outstanding
 
Other paid-in capital1,111
 1,111
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)62
 (2)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(1) (1)
Total shareholder's equity1,172
 1,108
    
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$3,413
 $3,493
    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.






SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$1,025 $848 $738 
Regulated natural gas168 117 116 
Total operating revenue1,193 965 854 
Operating expenses:
Cost of fuel and energy555 407 301 
Cost of natural gas purchased for resale111 61 62 
Operations and maintenance189 163 162 
Depreciation and amortization149 143 141 
Property and other taxes24 24 23 
Total operating expenses1,028 798 689 
Operating income165 167 165 
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(58)(54)(56)
Allowance for borrowed funds
Allowance for equity funds
Interest and dividend income18 
Other, net11 
Total other income (expense)(28)(25)(39)
Income before income tax expense137 142 126 
Income tax expense19 18 15 
Net income$118 $124 $111 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

366
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Operating revenue:     
Electric$713
 $702
 $810
Natural gas99
 110
 137
Total operating revenue812
 812
 947
      
Operating costs and expenses:     
Cost of fuel, energy and capacity268
 265
 374
Natural gas purchased for resale42
 55
 84
Operations and maintenance166
 170
 167
Depreciation and amortization114
 118
 113
Property and other taxes24
 24
 25
Total operating costs and expenses614
 632
 763
      
Operating income198
 180
 184
      
Other income (expense):     
Interest expense(43) (54) (61)
Allowance for borrowed funds2
 4
 2
Allowance for equity funds3
 (1) 2
Other, net4
 4
 3
Total other income (expense)(34) (47) (54)
      
Income before income tax expense164
 133
 130
Income tax expense55
 49
 47
Net income$109
 $84
 $83
      
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions, except shares)

RetainedAccumulated
OtherEarningsOtherTotal
Common StockPaid-in(AccumulatedComprehensiveShareholder's
SharesAmountCapitalDeficit)Loss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 20191,000 $— $1,111 $210 $(1)$1,320 
Net income— — — 111 — 111 
Dividends declared— — — (20)— (20)
Balance, December 31, 20201,000 — 1,111 301 (1)1,411 
Net income— — — 124 — 124 
Balance, December 31, 20211,000 — 1,111 425 (1)1,535 
Net income— — — 118 — 118 
Dividends declared— — — (70)— (70)
Contributions— — 465 — — 465 
Balance, December 31, 20221,000 $— $1,576 $473 $(1)$2,048 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

367
        Retained Accumulated  
      Other Earnings Other Total
  Common Stock Paid-in (Accumulated Comprehensive Shareholder's
  Shares Amount Capital Deficit) Loss, Net Equity
Balance, December 31, 2014 1,000
 $
 $1,111
 $(111) $(2) $998
Net income 
 
 
 83
 
 83
Dividends declared 
 
 
 (7) 
 (7)
Other equity transactions 
 
 
 
 2
 2
Balance, December 31, 2015 1,000
 
 1,111
 (35) 
 1,076
Net income 
 
 
 84
 
 84
Dividends declared 
 
 
 (51) 
 (51)
Other equity transactions

 
 
 
 
 (1) (1)
Balance, December 31, 2016 1,000
 
 1,111
 (2) (1) 1,108
Net income 
 
 
 109
 
 109
Dividends declared 
 
 
 (45) 
 (45)
Balance, December 31, 2017 1,000
 $
 $1,111
 $62
 $(1) $1,172
             
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$118 $124 $111 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization149 143 141 
Allowance for equity funds(7)(7)(4)
Deferred energy(267)(116)(17)
Amortization of deferred energy97 29 (14)
Other changes in regulatory assets and liabilities(1)(39)(33)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits31 13 12 
Other, net(1)(2)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(52)(27)(81)
Inventories(14)12 (19)
Accrued property, income and other taxes(13)
Accounts payable and other liabilities65 43 87 
Net cash flows from operating activities109 183 190 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(351)(300)(246)
Net cash flows from investing activities(351)(300)(246)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from long-term debt248 — 30 
Long-term debt reacquired(265)— — 
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt(159)114 45 
Net proceeds from affiliate note payable70 — — 
Dividends paid(70)— (20)
Contributions from parent465 — — 
Other, net(7)(7)(5)
Net cash flows from financing activities282 107 50 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents40 (10)(6)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period16 26 32 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$56 $16 $26 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

368
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$109
 $84
 $83
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Loss on nonrecurring items
 5
 
Depreciation and amortization114
 118
 113
Allowance for equity funds(4) 1
 (2)
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits55
 49
 47
Changes in regulatory assets and liabilities17
 (17) (21)
Deferred energy(20) 53
 81
Amortization of deferred energy(47) (54) 17
Other, net(3) 
 (9)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:     
Accounts receivable and other assets4
 7
 15
Inventories(3) (6) 1
Accrued property, income and other taxes1
 (3) 
Accounts payable and other liabilities(41) 6
 17
Net cash flows from operating activities182
 243
 342
      
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Capital expenditures(186) (194) (252)
Other, net
 
 2
Net cash flows from investing activities(186) (194) (250)
      
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 1,089
 
Repayments of long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations(2) (1,138) (1)
Dividends paid(45) (51) (7)
Net cash flows from financing activities(47) (100) (8)
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(51) (51) 84
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period55
 106
 22
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$4
 $55
 $106
      
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.




SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


(1)    Organization and Operations


Sierra Pacific Power Company together withand its subsidiaries ("Sierra Pacific"), is a wholly owned subsidiary of NV Energy, Inc. ("NV Energy"), a holding company that also owns Nevada Power Company and its subsidiaries ("Nevada Power") and certain other subsidiaries. Sierra Pacific is a United StatesU.S. regulated electric utility company serving retail customers, including residential, commercial and industrial customers and regulated retail natural gas customers primarily in northern Nevada. NV Energy is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"). BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in energy businesses. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway").


(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


Basis of Consolidation and Presentation


The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Sierra Pacific and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015. Certain amounts in the prior period Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications did not impact previously reported operating income, net income or retained earnings.2020.


Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements


The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.


Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation


Sierra Pacific prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Sierra Pacific defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

Sierra Pacific continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Sierra Pacific's ability to recover its costs. Sierra Pacific believes the application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at both the federal and state levels. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be written off to net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").



Fair Value Measurements


As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Different valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered inwhen determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.


369


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Investments


Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, United StatesU.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted amounts are includedcash and cash equivalents consist of funds restricted by the PUCN for a certain renewable energy contract. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, as presented in other assetsthe Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and other current assetsdisaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.Sheets (in millions):

As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $10 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents included in other current assets
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$56 $16 

Allowance for Doubtful AccountsCredit Losses


Accounts receivableTrade receivables are primarily short-term in nature with stated collection terms of less than one year from the date of origination and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts.credit losses. The allowance for doubtful accountscredit losses is based on Sierra Pacific's assessment of the collectibilitycollectability of amounts owed to Sierra Pacific by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, Sierra Pacific primarily utilizes credit loss history. However, Sierra Pacific may adjust the allowance for credit losses to reflect current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that deviate from historical experience. Sierra Pacific also has the ability to assess deposits on customers who have delayed payments or who are deemed to be a credit risk. The changechanges in the balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts,credit losses, which is included in accounts receivable,trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

2017 2016 2015202220212020
Beginning balance$2
 $1
 $2
Beginning balance$$$
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net2
 2
 1
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net
Write-offs, net(2) (1) (2)Write-offs, net(1)(3)(2)
Ending balance$2
 $2
 $1
Ending balance$$$


Derivatives


Sierra Pacific employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and interest rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements.


Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked‑to‑market and settled amounts are recognized as cost of fuel, energy and capacity or natural gas purchased for resale on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


For Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts, the settled amount is generally included in regulated rates. Accordingly, the net unrealized gains and losses associated with interim price movements on contracts that are accounted for as derivatives and probable of inclusion in regulated rates are recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. For a derivative contract not probable of inclusion in rates, changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings.


370



Inventories


Inventories consist mainly of materials and supplies totaling $42$69 million and $36$62 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, and fuel, which includes coal stock, stored natural gas and fuel oil, totaling $7$10 million and $9$3 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The cost is determined using the average cost method. Materials are charged to inventory when purchased and are expensed or capitalized to construction work in process, as appropriate, when used. Fuel costs are recovered from retail customers through the base tariff energy rates and deferred energy accounting adjustment charges approved by the Public Utilities Commission of Nevada ("PUCN").


Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


General


Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Sierra Pacific capitalizes all construction-related material, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed. The cost of repairs and minor replacements are charged to expense when incurred with the exception of costs for generation plant maintenance under certain long-term service agreements. Costs under these agreements are expensed straight-line over the term of the agreements as approved by the PUCN.


Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on either estimated useful lives or mandated recovery periods as prescribed by Sierra Pacific's various regulatory authorities. Depreciation studies are completed by Sierra Pacific to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the applicable regulatory commission. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as a non-current regulatory liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.


Generally when Sierra Pacific retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated using the composite method, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings with the exception of material gains or losses on regulated property, plant and equipment depreciated on a straight-line basis, which is then recorded to a regulatory asset or liability.


Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, are capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The rate applied to construction costs is the lower of the PUCN allowed rate of return and rates computed based on guidelines set forth by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC"). After construction is completed, Sierra Pacific is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets. Sierra Pacific's AFUDC rate used during 20172022 and 20162021 was 6.65%5.52% and 7.62%6.75%, respectively, for electric, 5.63%5.09% and 6.02%5.75%, respectively, for natural gas and 6.55%5.23% and 7.44%6.65%, respectively, for common facilities, respectively.facilities.


Asset Retirement Obligations


Sierra Pacific recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. Sierra Pacific's AROs are primarily associated with its generating facilities. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. The difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The costs are not recovered in rates until the work has been completed.



371


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets


Sierra Pacific evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment was used in regulated businesses, as of December 31, 2017, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.


Leases

Sierra Pacific has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for transmission and delivery assets, generating facilities, vehicles and office equipment and finance leases consisting primarily of transmission assets, generating facilities and vehicles. These leases generally require Sierra Pacific to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Sierra Pacific does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating Sierra Pacific is reasonably certain to exercise the option. Sierra Pacific's accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

Sierra Pacific's leases of generating facilities generally are for the long-term purchase of electric energy, also known as power purchase agreements ("PPA"). PPAs are generally signed before or during the early stages of project construction and can yield a lease that has not yet commenced. These agreements are primarily for renewable energy and the payments are considered variable lease payments as they are based on the amount of output.

Sierra Pacific's operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and current finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

Sierra Pacific uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which Sierra Pacific expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Sierra Pacific records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Substantially all of Sierra Pacific's Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by various regulatory commissions. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of energy, transmission, distribution and natural gas and have performance obligations to deliver energy products and services to customers which are satisfied over time as energy is delivered or services are provided. Other revenue consists primarily of revenue recognized in accordance with ASC 842, "Leases" and amounts not considered Customer Revenue within ASC 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers."

Revenue recognized is equal to what Sierra Pacific has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Sierra Pacific's performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $94 million and $78 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued.

372


Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and financing costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes


Berkshire Hathaway includes Sierra Pacific in its consolidated United StatesU.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, Sierra Pacific's provision for income taxes has been computed on a separate return basis.


Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using estimatedenacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with components of other comprehensive income ("OCI") are charged or credited directly to OCI. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("2017 Tax Reform") was signed into law which, among other items, reduces the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities that are associated with income tax benefits and expense for the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21%, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that Sierra Pacific deems probable to be passed on to its customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Investment tax credits are generally deferred and amortized over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.


In determining Sierra Pacific's income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by Sierra Pacific's various regulatory jurisdictions. Sierra Pacific's income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Sierra Pacific recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Sierra Pacific's federal, state and local incomeunrecognized tax examinations is uncertain, Sierra Pacific believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income taxbenefits are primarily included in other long-term liabilities that may result from these examinations, if any, is not expected to have a material impact on Sierra Pacific's consolidated financial results.the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized as electricity or natural gas is delivered or services are provided. Revenue recognized includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, unbilled revenue was $62 million and $52 million, respectively, and is included in accounts receivable, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Rates are established by regulators or contractual arrangements. When preliminary rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued. Sierra Pacific records sales, franchise and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Sierra Pacific primarily buys energy and natural gas to satisfy its customer load requirements. Due to changes in retail customer load requirements, Sierra Pacific may not take physical delivery of the energy or natural gas. Sierra Pacific may sell the excess energy or natural gas to the wholesale market. In such instances, it is Sierra Pacific's policy to allocate the natural gas sales between generation and natural gas retail based on usage. The energy sales and natural gas sales allocated to generation are recorded net in cost of fuel, energy and capacity. The natural gas sales allocated to natural gas retail is recorded as wholesale revenue.


Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and financing costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing on a straight-line basis.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2017-07, which amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 715, "Compensation - Retirement Benefits." The amendments in this guidance require that an employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and report the service cost component in the same line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statement of operations separately from the service cost component and outside the subtotal of operating income. Additionally, the guidance only allows the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. This guidance must be adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of operations and prospectively for the capitalization of the service cost component in the balance sheet. Sierra Pacific adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, which amends FASB ASC Subtopic 230-10, "Statement of Cash Flows - Overall." The amendments in this guidance require that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. Sierra Pacific adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, which amends FASB ASC Topic 230, "Statement of Cash Flows." The amendments in this guidance address the classification of eight specific cash flow issues within the statement of cash flows with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted retrospectively. Sierra Pacific adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 and the adoption will not have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, which creates FASB ASC Topic 842, "Leases" and supersedes Topic 840 "Leases." This guidance increases transparency and comparability among entities by recording lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. A lessee should recognize in the balance sheet a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. The recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. In January 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-01 that provides for an optional transition practical expedient allowing companies to not have to evaluate existing land easements if they were not previously accounted for under ASC Topic 840, "Leases." This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. Sierra Pacific plans to adopt this guidance effective January 1, 2019 and is currently evaluating the impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, which creates FASB ASC Topic 606, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers" and supersedes ASC Topic 605, "Revenue Recognition." The guidance replaces industry-specific guidance and establishes a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Additionally, the guidance requires the entity to disclose further quantitative and qualitative information regarding the nature and amount of revenues arising from contracts with customers, as well as other information about the significant judgments and estimates used in recognizing revenues from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, which defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 one year to interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. During 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued several ASUs that clarify the implementation guidance for ASU No. 2014-09 but do not change the core principle of the guidance. This guidance may be adopted retrospectively or under a modified retrospective method where the cumulative effect is recognized at the date of initial application. Sierra Pacific adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 under the modified retrospective method and the adoption will not have an impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements but will increase the disclosures included within Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The timing and amount of revenue recognized after adoption of the new guidance will not be different than before as a majority of revenue is recognized when Sierra Pacific has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of Sierra Pacific's performance to date. Sierra Pacific's current plan is to quantitatively disaggregate revenue in the required financial statement footnote by segment and customer class.

(3)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility plant:
Electric generation25 - 60 years$1,298 $1,163 
Electric transmission50 - 100 years993 940 
Electric distribution20 - 100 years1,983 1,846 
Electric general and intangible plant5 - 70 years219 204 
Natural gas distribution35 - 70 years455 438 
Natural gas general and intangible plant5 - 70 years15 14 
Common general5 - 70 years380 370 
Utility plant5,343 4,975 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(1,992)(1,854)
Utility plant, net3,351 3,121 
Construction work-in-progress236 219 
Property, plant and equipment, net$3,587 $3,340 
 Depreciable Life 2017 2016
Utility plant:     
Electric generation25 - 60 years $1,144
 $1,137
Electric distribution20 - 100 years 1,459
 1,417
Electric transmission50 - 100 years 786
 771
Electric general and intangible plant5 - 70 years 181
 164
Natural gas distribution35 - 70 years 390
 381
Natural gas general and intangible plant5 - 70 years 14
 15
Common general5 - 70 years 294
 267
Utility plant  4,268
 4,152
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (1,513) (1,442)
Utility plant, net  2,755
 2,710
Other non-regulated, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization70 years 5
 5
Plant, net  2,760
 2,715
Construction work-in-progress  132
 107
Property, plant and equipment, net  $2,892
 $2,822


All of Sierra Pacific's plant is subject to the ratemaking jurisdiction of the PUCN and the FERC. Sierra Pacific's depreciation and amortization expense, as authorized by the PUCN, stated as a percentage of the depreciable property balances as of December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 was 3.0%, 3.0%3.1% and 2.9%3.2%, respectively. Sierra Pacific is required to file a utility plant depreciation study every six years as a companion filing with the triennial general rate casereview filings. The most recent study was filed in 2022.


Construction work-in-progress is primarily related to the construction of regulated assets.

373


In January 2017, Sierra Pacific revised its electric and gas depreciation rates based on the results of a new depreciation study performed in 2016, the most significant impact of which was shorter estimated useful lives at the Valmy Generating Station. The effect of this change increased depreciation and amortization expense by $9 million annually based on depreciable plant balances at the time of the study. However, the PUCN ordered the change relating to the Valmy Generating Station of $7 million annually be deferred for future recovery through a regulatory asset.


(4)    Jointly Owned Utility Facilities


Under joint facility ownership agreements, Sierra Pacific, as tenants in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned generation and transmission facilities. Sierra Pacific accounts for its proportionate share of each facility and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners based on their percentage of ownership or energy production, depending on the nature of the cost. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include Sierra Pacific's share of the expenses of these facilities.


The amounts shown in the table below represent Sierra Pacific's share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 20172022 (dollars in millions):
SierraConstruction
Pacific'sUtilityAccumulatedWork-in-
SharePlantDepreciationProgress
Valmy Generating Station50 %$399 $327 $
ON Line Transmission Line40 — 
Valmy Transmission50 
Total$443 $337 $

(5)    Leases

The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$16 $15 
Finance leases105 111 
Total right-of-use assets$121 $126 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$15 $15 
Finance leases108 115 
Total lease liabilities$123 $130 

374


 Sierra     Construction
 Pacific's Utility Accumulated Work-in-
 Share Plant Depreciation Progress
        
Valmy Generating Station50% $388
 $233
 $1
ON Line Transmission Line1
 8
 1
 
Valmy Transmission50
 4
 2
 
Total  $400
 $236
 $1
The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Variable$103 $86 $78 
Operating
Finance:
Amortization
Interest
Total lease costs$117 $101 $93 
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases26.027.427.2
Finance leases28.228.427.8
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases5.0 %5.0 %5.0 %
Finance leases8.4 %8.2 %8.1 %

(5)The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's supplemental cash flow information relating to leases for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$(1)$(1)$(2)
Operating cash flows from finance leases(9)(9)(6)
Financing cash flows from finance leases(7)(7)(5)
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating leases$$— $— 
Finance leases89 

Sierra Pacific has the following remaining lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):
OperatingFinanceTotal
2023$$16 $17 
202415 16 
202516 17 
202615 16 
202713 14 
Thereafter23 137 160 
Total undiscounted lease payments28 212 240 
Less - amounts representing interest(13)(104)(117)
Lease liabilities$15 $108 $123 

375


Operating and Finance Lease Obligations

Sierra Pacific's operating and finance lease obligations consist mainly of ON Line and Truckee-Carson Irrigation District ("TCID"). ON Line was placed in-service on December 31, 2013. Sierra Pacific and Nevada Power, collectively the ("Nevada Utilities"), entered into a long-term transmission use agreement, in which the Nevada Utilities have a 25% interest and Great Basin Transmission South, LLC has a 75% interest. The Nevada Utilities' share of the long-term transmission use agreement and ownership interest is split at 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, previously split 95% for Nevada Power and 5% for Sierra Pacific. In December 2019, the PUCN ordered the Nevada Utilities to complete the necessary procedures to change the ownership split to 75% for Nevada Power and 25% for Sierra Pacific, effective January 1, 2020. In August 2020, the FERC approved the amended agreement between the Nevada Utilities and Great Basin Transmission, LLC that reallocated the PUCN-approved ownership percentage change from Nevada Power to Sierra Pacific. The term of the lease is 41 years with the agreement ending December 31, 2054. In 1999, Sierra Pacific entered into a 50-year agreement with TCID to lease electric distribution facilities. Total finance lease obligations of $107 million and $110 million were included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, for these leases. See Note 2 for further discussion of Sierra Pacific's remaining lease obligations.

(6)    Regulatory Matters


Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future rates. Sierra Pacific's regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred energy costs1 year$277 $107 
Natural disaster protection plan1 year69 62 
Merger costs from 1999 merger24 years63 66 
Employee benefit plans(1)
8 years57 46 
Deferred operating costs7 years35 31 
Unrealized loss on regulated derivative contracts1 year21 35 
OtherVarious89 93 
Total regulatory assets$611 $440 
Reflected as:
Current assets$357 $177 
Noncurrent assets254 263 
Total regulatory assets$611 $440 
 Weighted    
 Average    
 Remaining Life 2017 2016
      
Employee benefit plans(1)
8 years $110
 $128
Merger costs from 1999 merger29 years 77
 80
Abandoned projects7 years 34
 39
Renewable energy programs2 years 23
 25
Losses on reacquired debt16 years 21
 22
Deferred income taxes(2)
N/A 
 85
OtherVarious 67
 56
Total regulatory assets  $332
 $435
      
Reflected as:     
Current assets  $32
 $25
Other assets  300
 410
Total regulatory assets  $332
 $435
(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.

(1)Represents amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit cost that are expected to be included in regulated rates when recognized.

(2)Amounts represent income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.


Sierra Pacific had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $188$143 million and $305$158 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The regulatory assets not earning a return on investment primarily consist of merger costs from the 1999 merger, a portion of the employee benefit plans, losses on reacquired debt, asset retirement obligationsAROs and legacy meters.

376


Regulatory assets not earning a return as of December 31, 2016 also included deferred income taxes.Liabilities



Regulatory liabilities represent amounts that are expected to be returned to customers in future periods. Sierra Pacific's regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted
Average
Remaining Life20222021
Deferred income taxes(1)
Various$223 $234 
Cost of removal(2)
35 years200 201 
OtherVarious32 28 
Total regulatory liabilities$455 $463 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$19 $19 
Noncurrent liabilities436 444 
Total regulatory liabilities$455 $463 
 Weighted    
 Average    
 Remaining Life 2017 2016
      
Deferred income taxes(1)
29 years $264
 $6
Cost of removal(2)
41 years 211
 205
Deferred energy costs2 years 8
 64
OtherVarious 17
 15
Total regulatory liabilities  $500
 $290
      
Reflected as:     
Current liabilities  $19
 $69
Other long-term liabilities  481
 221
Total regulatory liabilities  $500
 $290


(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to accelerated tax depreciation and certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. See Note 9 for further discussion of 2017 Tax Reform impacts.

(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices.
(2)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Amounts are deducted from rate base or otherwise accrue a carrying cost.


Deferred Energy


Nevada statutes permit regulated utilities to adopt deferred energy accounting procedures. The intent of these procedures is to ease the effect on customers of fluctuations in the cost of purchased natural gas, fuel and electricity and are subject to annual prudency review by the PUCN. Under deferred energy accounting, to the extent actual fuel and purchased power costs exceed fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates that excess is not recorded as a current expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations but rather is deferred and recorded as a regulatory asset on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and would be included in the table above as deferred energy costs. Conversely, a regulatory liability is recorded to the extent fuel and purchased power costs recoverable through current rates exceed actual fuel and purchased power costs and is included in the table above as deferred energy costs. These excess amounts are reflected in quarterly adjustments to rates and recorded as cost of fuel, energy and capacity in future time periods.


Regulatory Rate Review


In June 2016,2022, Sierra Pacific filed an electrica regulatory rate review with the PUCN. The filingPUCN that requested no incrementalan annual revenue relief.increase of $88 million, or 9.7%. In October 2016, Sierra Pacific filed withaddition, a filing was made to revise depreciation rates based on a study, the PUCN a settlement agreement resolving most, but not all, issuesresults of which are reflected in the proceeding and reduced Sierra Pacific's electric revenue requirement by $3 million spread evenly to all rate classes. In December 2016, the PUCN approved the settlement agreement and established an additional six MW of net metering capacity under the grandfathered rates, which are those net metering rates that were in effect prior to January 2016; the order establishes cost-based rates and a value-based excess energy credit for customers who choose to install private generation after the six MW limitation is reached. The new rates were effective January 1, 2017. In January 2017, Sierra Pacific filed a petition for reconsideration relating to the creation of the additional six MW of net metering at the grandfathered rates. Sierra Pacific believes the effects of the PUCN decision results in additional cost shifting to non-net metering customers and reduces the stipulated rate reduction for other customer classes. In June 2017, the PUCN denied the petition for reconsideration.

In June 2016, Sierra Pacific filed a gas regulatory rate review with the PUCN. The filing requested a slight decrease in its incremental annualproposed revenue requirement. In October 2016, Sierra Pacific filed with the PUCN a settlement agreement resolving all issues in the proceeding and reduced Sierra Pacific's gas revenue requirement by $2 million. In December 2016, the PUCN approved the settlement agreement. The new rates were effective January 1, 2017.


Energy Efficiency Program Rates ("EEPR") and Energy Efficiency Implementation Rates ("EEIR")

EEPR was established to allow Sierra Pacific to recover the costs of implementing energy efficiency programs and EEIR was established to offset the negative impacts on revenue associated with the successful implementation of energy efficiency programs. These rates change once a year in the utility's annual DEAA application based on energy efficiency program budgets prepared by Sierra Pacific and approved by the PUCN in integrated resource plan proceedings. To the extent Sierra Pacific's earned rate of return exceeds the rate of return used to set base general rates, Sierra Pacific is required to refund to customers EEIR revenue previously collected for that year. In March 2017,August 2022, Sierra Pacific filed an applicationupdated certification filing that requested an annual revenue increase of $77 million, or 8.5%. Parties to reset the EEIRreview filed testimony and EEPR.evidence in August and September 2022. Hearings in the cost of capital, revenue requirement, and rate design phases were held in September, October, and November 2022, respectively. In September 2017,December 2022, the PUCN issued an order acceptingapproving an increase in base rates of $58 million, effective January 1, 2023, reflecting a stipulationreduction in Sierra Pacific's requested rate of return, updated depreciation and amortization rates for its electric operations and updated time of use periods to resetreflect the rates as filed effective October 1, 2017. The EEIR liability for Sierra Pacific is $1 million and $2 million, which is includedchanges in current regulatory liabilitiessystem costs due to the increased solar generation on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017system.


377


(7)Short-term Debt and 2016, respectively.Credit Facilities

Chapter 704B Applications

Chapter 704B of the Nevada Revised Statutes allows retail electric customers with an average annual load of one megawatt ("MW") or more to file with the PUCN an application to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become distribution only service customers. On a case-by-case basis, the PUCN will assess the application and may deny or grant the application subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee, paying on-going charges and receiving approval for specific alternative energy providers and terms. The impact fee and on-going charges are assessed to alleviate the burden on other Nevada customers for the applicant's share of previously committed investments and long-term renewable contracts and are set at a level designed such that the remaining customers are not subjected to increased costs.

In September 2016, Switch, Ltd. ("Switch"), a customer of Sierra Pacific, filed an application with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become a distribution only service customer of Sierra Pacific. In December 2016, the PUCN approved a stipulation agreement that allows Switch to purchase energy from alternative providers without paying an impact fee, subject to conditions. In June 2017, Switch became a distribution only service customer and started procuring energy from another energy supplier.

In November 2016, Caesars Enterprise Service ("Caesars"), a customer of Sierra Pacific, filed an application with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become a distribution only service customer of Sierra Pacific. In March 2017, the PUCN approved the application allowing Caesars to purchase energy from alternative providers subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee. In March 2017, Caesars provided notice that it intends to pay the impact fee monthly for three years and proceed with purchasing energy from alternative providers. In July 2017, Caesars made the required compliance filings and, in September 2017, the PUCN issued an order allowing Caesars to acquire electric energy and ancillary services from another energy supplier and become a distribution only service customer of Sierra Pacific. In January 2018, Caesars became a distribution only service customer and started procuring energy from another energy supplier for its eligible meters in the Sierra Pacific service territory.

In May 2017, Peppermill Resort Spa Casino ("Peppermill"), a customer of Sierra Pacific, filed an application with the PUCN to purchase energy from alternative providers of a new electric resource and become a distribution only service customer of Sierra Pacific. In August 2017, the PUCN approved a stipulation allowing Peppermill to purchase energy from alternative providers subject to conditions, including paying an impact fee. In September 2017, Peppermill provided notice that it intends to pay the impact fee and proceed with purchasing energy from alternative providers.


(6)Credit Facility


The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's availability under its credit facilities as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Credit facilities$250 $250 
Short-term debt— (159)
Net credit facilities$250 $91 
  2017 2016
Credit facilities $250
 $250
Less - Water Facilities Refunding Revenue Bond support

 (80) (80)
Net credit facilities $170
 $170


Sierra Pacific has a $250 million secured credit facility expiring in June 20202025 with two one-yearan unlimited number of maturity extension options, subject to lender consent. The credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Eurodollar rateSecured Overnight Financing Rate or a base rate, at Sierra Pacific's option, plus a spread that varies based on Sierra Pacific's credit ratings for its senior secured long‑term debt securities. As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, Sierra Pacific had no borrowings of $— million and $159 million, respectively, outstanding under the credit facility. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the weighted average interest rate on borrowings outstanding was —% and 0.86%, respectively. Amounts due under Sierra Pacific's credit facility are collateralized by Sierra Pacific's general and refunding mortgage bonds. The credit facility requires Sierra Pacific's ratio of consolidated debt, including current maturities, to total capitalization not exceed 0.65 to 1.0 as of the last day of each quarter.


378
(7)    Long-Term


(8)    Long-term Debt and Financial and Capital Lease Obligations


Sierra Pacific's long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):
 Par Value 2017 2016
General and refunding mortgage securities:     
3.375% Series T, due 2023$250
 $248
 $248
2.600% Series U, due 2026400
 396
 395
6.750% Series P, due 2037252
 255
 255
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:     
Fixed-rate series:     
1.250% Pollution Control Series 2016A, due 2029(1)
20
 20
 20
1.500% Gas Facilities Series 2016A, due 2031(1)
59
 58
 58
3.000% Gas and Water Series 2016B, due 2036(2)
60
 63
 64
Variable-rate series (2017 - 1.690% to 1.840%, 2016 - 0.788% to 0.800%):     
Water Facilities Series 2016C, due 203630
 30
 29
Water Facilities Series 2016D, due 203625
 25
 25
Water Facilities Series 2016E, due 203625
 25
 25
Capital and financial lease obligations (2017 - 2.700% to 10.396%, 2016 - 2.700% to 10.130%), due through 205434
 34
 34
Total long-term debt and financial and capital leases$1,155
 $1,154
 $1,153
      
Reflected as:     
Current portion of long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations  $2
 $1
Long-term debt and financial and capital lease obligations  1,152
 1,152
Total long-term debt and financial and capital leases  $1,154
 $1,153

(1)Subject to mandatory purchase by Sierra Pacific in June 2019 at which date the interest rate may be adjusted from time to time.
(2)Subject to mandatory purchase by Sierra Pacific in June 2022 at which date the interest rate may be adjusted from time to time.

Par Value20222021
General and refunding mortgage securities:
3.375% Series T, due 2023$250 $249 $249 
2.600% Series U, due 2026400 397 397 
6.750% Series P, due 2037252 254 253 
4.710% Series W, due 2052250 248 — 
Tax-exempt refunding revenue bond obligations:
Fixed-rate series:
1.850% Pollution Control Series 2016B, due 2029— — 30 
3.000% Gas and Water Series 2016B, due 2036— — 60 
0.625% Water Facilities Series 2016C, due 2036— — 30 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016D, due 2036— — 25 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016E, due 2036— — 25 
2.050% Water Facilities Series 2016F, due 2036— — 75 
1.850% Water Facilities Series 2016G, due 2036— — 20 
Total long-term debt$1,152 $1,148 $1,164 
Reflected as:
Current portion of long-term debt$250 $— 
Long-term debt898 1,164 
Total long-term debt$1,148 $1,164 
Annual Payment on Long-Term Debt and Financial and Capital Leases

The annual repayments of long-term debt and capital and financial leases for the years beginning January 1, 20182023 and thereafter, are as follows (in millions):
2023$250 
2026400 
2028 and thereafter502 
Total1,152 
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost(4)
Total$1,148 
  Long-term Capital and Financial  
  Debt Lease Obligations Total
       
2018 $
 $4
 $4
2019 
 4
 4
2020 
 4
 4
2021 
 4
 4
2022 
 3
 3
Thereafter 1,121
 47
 1,168
Total 1,121
 66
 1,187
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost
 (1) 
 (1)
Amounts representing interest 
 (32) (32)
Total $1,120
 $34
 $1,154


The issuance of General and Refunding Mortgage Securities by Sierra Pacific is subject to PUCN approval and is limited by available property and other provisions of the mortgage indentures. As of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately $3.9$4.9 billion (based on original cost) of Sierra Pacific's property was subject to the liens of the mortgages.


Financial and Capital Lease Obligations

(9)    Income Taxes
Sierra Pacific has master leasing agreements of which various pieces of equipment qualify as capital leases. The remaining equipment is treated as operating leases. Lease terms average seven years under the master lease agreement. Capital assets of $3 million were included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
ON Line was placed in-service on December 31, 2013. The Nevada Utilities entered into a long-term transmission use agreement, in which the Nevada Utilities have 25% interest and Great Basin Transmission South, LLC has 75% interest. Refer to Note 4 for additional information. The Nevada Utilities share of the long-term transmission use agreement and ownership interest is split at 5% for Sierra Pacific and 95% for Nevada Power. The term is for 41 years with the agreement ending December 31, 2054. Payments began on January 31, 2014. ON Line assets of $21 million were included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.
In 2015, Sierra Pacific entered into a 20-year capital lease for the Fort Churchill Solar Array. Capital assets of $9 million and $10 million were included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

(8)Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of Sierra Pacific's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. Sierra Pacific has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Sierra Pacific has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect Sierra Pacific's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. Sierra Pacific develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

The following table presents Sierra Pacific's assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):

 Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements  
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
As of December 31, 2017:       
Assets - investment funds$
 $
 $
 $
        
As of December 31, 2016:       
Assets:       
Money market mutual funds(1)
$35
 $
 $
 $35
Investment funds1
 
 
 1
 $36
 $
 $
 $36
        

(1)Amounts are included in cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of these money market mutual funds approximates cost.

Sierra Pacific's investments in money market mutual funds and equity securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

Sierra Pacific's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of Sierra Pacific's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The carrying value of Sierra Pacific's variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value because of the frequent repricing of these instruments at market rates. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Sierra Pacific's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016
 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair
 Value Value Value Value
        
Long-term debt$1,120
 $1,221
 $1,119
 $1,191

(9)Income Taxes

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

The 2017 Tax Reform impacts many areas of income tax law. The most material items include the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, limitations on bonus depreciation for utility property and the elimination of the deduction for production activities. GAAP requires the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates be recognized in the period the tax rate change was enacted. As a result of the 2017 Tax Reform, Sierra Pacific reduced deferred income tax liabilities $342 million. As it is probable the change in deferred taxes will be passed back to customers through regulatory mechanisms, Sierra Pacific increased net regulatory liabilities by $341 million.


In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 to assist in the implementation process of the 2017 Tax Reform by allowing for calculations to be classified as provisional and subject to remeasurement. There are three different classifications for the accounting: (1) completed, (2) not complete but reasonably estimable or (3) not complete and amounts are not reasonably estimable. Sierra Pacific has recorded the impacts of the 2017 Tax Reform and believes all the impacts to be complete with the exception of the interpretation of the bonus depreciation rules. Sierra Pacific has determined the amounts recorded and the interpretation relating to this item to be provisional and subject to remeasurement during the measurement period upon obtaining the necessary additional information to complete the accounting. Sierra Pacific believes its interpretations for bonus depreciation to be reasonable, however, as the guidance is clarified estimates may change. The accounting is estimated to be completed by December 2018.


Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Current – Federal$(12)$$
Deferred – Federal31 13 12 
Total income tax expense$19 $18 $15 

379

 2017 2016 2015
      
Deferred - Federal$56
 $50
 $48
Investment tax credits(1) (1) (1)
Total income tax expense$55
 $49
 $47


A reconciliation of the federal statutory income rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
Effects of ratemaking(7)(8)(9)
Effective income tax rate14 %13 %12 %
 2017 2016 2015
      
Federal statutory income tax rate35 % 35% 35%
Effects of ratemaking
 1
 1
Effect of tax rate change(1) 
 
Other
 1
 
Effective income tax rate34 % 37% 36%


The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
 20222021
Deferred income tax assets:  
Regulatory liabilities$63 $64 
Operating and finance leases26 27 
Customer advances17 14 
Unamortized contract value
Other
Total deferred income tax assets118 119 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property related items(387)(379)
Regulatory assets(135)(94)
Operating and finance leases(25)(27)
Other(16)(21)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(563)(521)
Net deferred income tax liability$(445)$(402)
 2017 2016
Deferred income tax assets:   
Regulatory liabilities$67
 $16
Federal net operating loss and credit carryforwards10
 25
Employee benefit plans10
 22
Capital and financial leases7
 12
Customer Advances7
 9
Commodity derivative contract
 5
Other6
 6
Total deferred income tax assets107
 95
    
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Property related items(349) (562)
Regulatory assets(74) (124)
Capital and financial leases(7) (12)
Other(7) (14)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(437) (712)
Net deferred income tax liability$(330) $(617)



The following table providesU.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed or effectively settled its examination of Sierra Pacific's income tax return through the short year ended December 31, 2013. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, may not preclude the U.S. Internal Revenue Service from adjusting the federal net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and expiration dates ascarryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of December 31, 2017 (in millions):limitations is not closed.

Net operating loss carryforwards$18
Deferred income taxes on federal net operating loss carryforwards$4
Expiration dates2033
  
Other tax credits$6
Expiration dates2021 - 2032

The United States federal jurisdiction is the only significant income tax jurisdiction for NV Energy. In July 2012, the United States Internal Revenue Service and the Joint Committee on Taxation concluded their examination of NV Energy with respect to its United States federal income tax returns for December 31, 2005 through December 31, 2008.

(10)    Related Party TransactionsEmployee Benefit Plans

Sierra Pacific has an intercompany administrative services agreement with BHE and its subsidiaries. Amounts charged to Sierra Pacific under this agreement totaled $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Sierra Pacific provided electricity to Nevada Power of $21 million, $17 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Receivables associated with these transactions were $- million and $12 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. Sierra Pacific purchased electricity from Nevada Power of $104 million, $78 million and $69 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Payables associated with these transactions were $10 million and $45 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Sierra Pacific incurs intercompany administrative and shared facility costs with NV Energy and Nevada Power. These transactions are governed by an intercompany service agreement and are priced at cost. NV Energy provided services to Sierra Pacific of $5 million, $5 million and $6 million for the years ending December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Sierra Pacific provided services to Nevada Power of $17 million, $14 million, and $16 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Nevada Power provided services to Sierra Pacific of $27 million, $24 million, and $22 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Sierra Pacific's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to NV Energy of $17 million and $18 million, respectively. There were no receivables due from NV Energy as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, Sierra Pacific's Consolidated Balance Sheets included payables due to Nevada Power of $5 million and $4 million, respectively. There were no receivables due from Nevada Power as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Sierra Pacific is party to a tax-sharing agreement with NV Energy and NV Energy is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated United States federal income tax return. There were no federal income taxes payable to NV Energy as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. No cash payments were made for federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

Certain disbursements for accounts payable and payroll are made by NV Energy on behalf of Sierra Pacific and reimbursed automatically when settled by the bank. These amounts are recorded as accounts payable at the time of disbursement.

(11)    Retirement Plan and Postretirement Benefits


Sierra Pacific is a participant in benefit plans sponsored by NV Energy. The NV Energy Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan ("Qualified Pension Plan") and a supplemental executive retirement plan and a restoration plan (collectively, "Non‑Qualified Pension Plans") that provide pension benefits for eligible employees. The NV Energy Comprehensive Welfare Benefit and Cafeteria Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Plans") on behalf of Sierra Pacific. Sierra Pacific contributed $1 million, $27 million and $- milliondid not make any contributions to the Qualified Pension Plan for the yearyears ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015, respectively. For the Other Postretirement Plans,2020. Sierra Pacific contributed $4 million, $1 million and $- million for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Sierra Pacific contributed $1 million, $- million and $- million to the Non-Qualified Pension Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Sierra Pacific contributed $5 million and $1 million to the Other Post Retirement Plans for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Sierra Pacific did not make any contributions to the Other Post Retirement Plans for the year ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2020. Amounts attributable to Sierra Pacific were allocated from NV Energy based upon the current, or in the case of retirees, previous, employment location. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates. Net periodic benefit costs not included in regulated rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net.


380


Amounts payable toreceivable from (payable to) NV Energy are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and consist of the following as of December 31(in31 (in millions):
20222021
Qualified Pension Plan -
Other non-current assets$43 $62 
Non-Qualified Pension Plans:
Other current liabilities(1)(1)
Other long-term liabilities(5)(7)
Other Postretirement Plans -
Other long-term liabilities(2)(10)

 2017 2016
Qualified Pension Plan -   
Other long-term liabilities$(2) $(12)
    
Non-Qualified Pension Plans:   
Other current liabilities(1) (1)
Other long-term liabilities(8) (9)
    
Other Postretirement Plans -   
Other long-term liabilities(20) (28)

(12)(11)    Asset Retirement Obligations


Sierra Pacific estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.


Sierra Pacific does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on certain generation, transmission, distribution and other assets cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. These accruals totaled $211$200 million and $205$201 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.


The following table presents Sierra Pacific's ARO liabilities by asset type as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Asbestos$$
Evaporative ponds and dry ash landfills
Other
Total asset retirement obligations$11 $11 
 2017 2016
    
Asbestos$5
 $4
Evaporative ponds and dry ash landfills2
 3
Other3
 3
Total asset retirement obligations$10
 $10


The following table reconciles theSierra Pacific's ARO liabilities beginning and ending balances of Sierra Pacific's ARO liabilitiestotaled $11 million for the years ended December 31, (in millions):2022 and 2021. These balances are reflected as other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$10
 $10
Retirements
 
Ending balance$10
 $10
    
Reflected as:   
Other current liabilities$
 $
Other long-term liabilities10
 10
 $10
 $10



Certain of Sierra Pacific's decommissioning and reclamation obligations relate to jointly-owned facilities, and as such, Sierra Pacific is committed to pay a proportionate share of the decommissioning or reclamation costs. In the event of a default by any of the other joint participants, the respective subsidiary may be obligated to absorb, directly or by paying additional sums to the entity, a proportionate share of the defaulting party's liability. Sierra Pacific's estimated share of the decommissioning and reclamation obligations are primarily recorded as ARO liabilities in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.


381
(13)Commitments and Contingencies



(12)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

Sierra Pacific is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices and interest rates. Sierra Pacific is principally exposed to electricity, natural gas and coal market fluctuations primarily through Sierra Pacific's obligation to serve retail customer load in its regulated service territory. Sierra Pacific's load and generating facilities represent substantial underlying commodity positions. Exposures to commodity prices consist mainly of variations in the price of fuel required to generate electricity and wholesale electricity that is purchased and sold. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, generating facility availability, customer usage, storage, and transmission and transportation constraints. The actual cost of fuel and purchased power is recoverable through the deferred energy mechanism. Interest rate risk exists on variable-rate debt and future debt issuances. Sierra Pacific does not engage in proprietary trading activities.

Sierra Pacific has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Sierra Pacific uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Sierra Pacific manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. Additionally, Sierra Pacific may from time to time enter into interest rate derivative contracts, such as interest rate swaps or locks, to mitigate Sierra Pacific's exposure to interest rate risk. Sierra Pacific does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in Sierra Pacific's accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 13 for additional information on derivative contracts.

The following table, which excludes contracts that have been designated as normal under the normal purchases and normal sales exception afforded by GAAP, summarizes the fair value of Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts, on a gross basis, and reconciles those amounts presented on a net basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

OtherOtherOther
CurrentCurrentLong-term
AssetsLiabilitiesLiabilitiesTotal
As of December 31, 2022:
Not designated as hedging contracts (1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (14)(7)(21)
Total derivative - net basis$$(14)$(7)$(13)
As of December 31, 2021:
Not designated as hedging contracts(1):
Commodity assets$$— $— $
Commodity liabilities— (16)(19)(35)
Total derivative - net basis$$(16)$(19)$(33)

(1)Sierra Pacific's commodity derivatives not designated as hedging contracts are included in regulated rates. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, a regulatory asset of $13 million and $33 million, respectively, was recorded related to the net derivative liability of $13 million and $33 million, respectively.

382


Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):
Unit of
Measure20222021
Electricity purchasesMegawatt hours
Natural gas purchasesDecatherms52 53 

Credit Risk

Sierra Pacific is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Sierra Pacific's counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Sierra Pacific analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Sierra Pacific enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtain third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Sierra Pacific exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

Collateral and Contingent Features

In accordance with industry practice, certain wholesale agreements, including derivative contracts, contain credit support provisions that in part base certain collateral requirements on credit ratings for senior unsecured debt as reported by one or more of the recognized credit rating agencies. These agreements may either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed specified rating-dependent threshold levels ("credit-risk-related contingent features") or provide the right for counterparties to demand "adequate assurance" if there is a material adverse change in Sierra Pacific's creditworthiness. These rights can vary by contract and by counterparty. As of December 31, 2022, Sierra Pacific's credit ratings for its senior secured debt and its issuer credit ratings for senior unsecured debt from the recognized credit rating agencies were investment grade.

The aggregate fair value of Sierra Pacific's derivative contracts in liability positions with specific credit-risk-related contingent features totaled $— million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which represents the amount of collateral to be posted if all credit risk related contingent features for derivative contracts in liability positions had been triggered. Sierra Pacific's collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due to market price volatility, changes in credit ratings, changes in legislation or regulation or other factors.

(13)    Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of Sierra Pacific's cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. Sierra Pacific has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Sierra Pacific has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect Sierra Pacific's judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. Sierra Pacific develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.
383


The following table presents Sierra Pacific's financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):
Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds49 — — 49 
Investment funds— — 
$50 $— $$58 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(21)$(21)
As of December 31, 2021:
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $— $$
Money market mutual funds10 — — 10 
Investment funds— — 
$11 $— $$13 
Liabilities - commodity derivatives$— $— $(35)$(35)

Sierra Pacific's investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Sierra Pacific transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, Sierra Pacific uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent Sierra Pacific's estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. Sierra Pacific bases its forward price curves upon internally developed models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations for certain electricity and natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to markets that are not active. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, Sierra Pacific uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The model incorporates a mid-market pricing convention (the mid‑point price between bid and ask prices) as a practical expedient for valuing its assets and liabilities measured and reported at fair value. The determination of the fair value for derivative contracts not only includes counterparty risk, but also the impact of Sierra Pacific's nonperformance risk on its liabilities, which as of December 31, 2022, had an immaterial impact to the fair value of its derivative contracts. As such, Sierra Pacific considers its derivative contracts to be valued using Level 3 inputs.

Sierra Pacific's investments in money market mutual funds and equity securities are accounted for as available-for-sale securities and are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

384


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Sierra Pacific's net commodity derivative assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant Level 3 inputs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Beginning balance$(33)$$(1)
Changes in fair value recognized in regulatory assets or liabilities(21)(25)(2)
Settlements41 (15)10 
Ending balance$(13)$(33)$

Sierra Pacific's long-term debt is carried at cost on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of Sierra Pacific's long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Sierra Pacific's long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$1,148 $1,111 $1,164 $1,316 

(14)    Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments

Sierra Pacific has the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as of December 31, 2022 are as follows (in millions):
2028 and
20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Contract type:
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$413 $244 $184 $134 $127 $1,447 $2,549 
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)11 12 12 11 236 290 
Construction commitments500 741 86 268 — — 1,595 
Easements33 43 
Maintenance, service and other contracts— 25 
Total commitments$930 $1,003 $289 $419 $140 $1,721 $4,502 

Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments

Purchased Power

Sierra Pacific has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy which have been approved by the PUCN. The expiration of these contracts range from 2025 to 2047. Purchased power includes estimated payments for contracts which meet the definition of a lease and payments are based on the amount of energy expected to be generated. See Note 5 for further discussion of Sierra Pacific's lease commitments.

Coal and Natural Gas
Sierra Pacific has a long-term contract for the transport of coal that expires in 2024. Additionally, gas transportation contracts expire from 2023 to 2046 and the gas supply contracts expire from 2023 to 2024.

385


Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments - Not Commercially Operable

Sierra Pacific has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy in which the facility remains under development. Amounts represent the estimated payments under renewable energy power purchase contracts, which have been approved by the PUCN and are contingent upon the developers obtaining commercial operation and their ability to deliver power.

Construction Commitments

Sierra Pacific's construction commitments included in the table above relate to firm commitments and include costs associated with two solar photovoltaic facility projects and solar photovoltaic panels for future projects. The first project is a 250-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 200 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Humboldt County, Nevada. The second project is a 350-MW solar photovoltaic facility with an additional 280 MWs of co-located battery storage that will be developed in Humboldt County, Nevada. Commercial operation has been delayed for both projects to an undetermined date. Both facilities will be jointly owned and operated by Nevada Power and Sierra Pacific.

Easements

Sierra Pacific has non-cancelable easements for land. Operating and maintenance expense on non-cancelable easements totaled $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.

Maintenance, Service and Other Contracts

Sierra Pacific has long-term service agreements for the performance of maintenance on generation units. Obligation amounts are based on estimated usage. The estimated expiration of these service agreements range from 2026 to 2046.

Environmental Laws and Regulations


Sierra Pacific is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air and water quality, renewable portfolio standards,climate change, emissions performance standards, climate change,water quality, coal combustion byproductash disposal hazardous and solid waste disposal, protected species and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact Sierra Pacific'sits current and future operations. Sierra Pacific believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.


Legal Matters


Sierra Pacific is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. Sierra Pacific does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.

Commitments

Sierra Pacific hasis also involved in other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or seek to impose fines, penalties and other costs in substantial amounts.

386


(15)    Revenues from Contracts with Customers

The following table summarizes Sierra Pacific's Customer Revenue by customer class, including a reconciliation to Sierra Pacific's reportable segment information included in Note 18, for the following firm commitments that are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Minimum payments as ofyears ended December 31 2017 are as follows (in millions):
202220212020
ElectricNatural GasTotalElectricNatural GasTotalElectricNatural GasTotal
Customer Revenue:
Retail:
Residential$365 $105 $470 $307 $76 $383 $273 $76 $349 
Commercial333 45 378 267 29 296 233 29 262 
Industrial229 16 245 202 10 212 170 179 
Other— — 
Total fully bundled933 167 1,100 781 115 896 681 114 795 
Distribution only service— — — 
Total retail938 167 1,105 784 115 899 685 114 799 
Wholesale, transmission and other86 — 86 62 — 62 50 — 50 
Total Customer Revenue1,024 167 1,191 846 115 961 735 114 849 
Other revenue
Total operating revenue$1,025 $168 $1,193 $848 $117 $965 $738 $116 $854 

           2023 and  
 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Thereafter Total
Contract type:             
Fuel, capacity and transmission contract commitments$200
 $155
 $114
 $74
 $71
 $515
 $1,129
Fuel and capacity contract commitments (not commercially operable)
 7
 17
 22
 22
 590
 658
Operating leases and easements4
 4
 4
 3
 2
 54
 71
Maintenance, service and other contracts6
 6
 6
 7
 5
 12
 42
Total commitments$210
 $172
 $141
 $106
 $100
 $1,171
 $1,900

Fuel and Capacity Contract Commitments

Purchased Power

Sierra Pacific has several contracts for long-term purchase of electric energy which have been approved by the PUCN. The expiration of these contracts range from 2018 to 2045. Purchased power includes contracts which meet the definition of a lease. Sierra Pacific's operating and maintenance expense for purchase power contracts which met the lease criteria for 2017, 2016 and 2015 were $74 million, $69 million and $65 million, respectively, and are recorded as cost of fuel, energy and capacity on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Coal and Natural Gas
Sierra Pacific has a long-term contract for the transport of coal that expires in 2018. Additionally, gas transportation contracts expire from 2019 to 2046 and the gas supply contracts expire from 2018 to 2019.

Operating Leases and Easements

Sierra Pacific has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office equipment, office space, certain operating facilities, vehicles and land. These leases generally require Sierra Pacific to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. Sierra Pacific also has non-cancelable easements for land. Operating and maintenance expense on non-cancelable operating leases and easements totaled $4 million, $6 million and $7 million for the year-ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Maintenance, Service and Other Contracts

Sierra Pacific has long-term service agreements for the performance of maintenance on generation units. Obligation amounts are based on estimated usage. The estimated expiration of these service agreements range from 2019 to 2039.

(14)(16)Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures


The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):
202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$45 $41 $42 
Income taxes (refunded) paid$(1)$(3)$
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$57 $27 $17 

(17)    Related Party Transactions

Sierra Pacific has an intercompany administrative services agreement with BHE and its subsidiaries. Amounts charged to Sierra Pacific under this agreement, either directly or through NV Energy, totaled $23 million, $14 million and $4 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Amounts charged to Sierra Pacific in 2022 and 2021 primarily relate to information technology projects billed at a consolidated level and passed through to affiliates.

Sierra Pacific provided electricity to Nevada Power of $86 million, $43 million and $34 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Receivables associated with these transactions were $5 million and $— million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Sierra Pacific purchased electricity from Nevada Power of $362 million, $179 million and $106 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Payables associated with these transactions were $41 million and $13 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

387


 2017 2016 2015
      
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information -     
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$40
 $47
 $54
      
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:     
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$10
 $15
 $24
Capital and financial lease obligations incurred$1
 $
 $13
Sierra Pacific incurs intercompany administrative and shared facility costs with NV Energy and Nevada Power. These transactions are governed by an intercompany service agreement and are priced at cost. NV Energy provided services to Sierra Pacific of $5 million for the years ending December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sierra Pacific provided services to Nevada Power of $16 million, $15 million, and $15 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Nevada Power provided services to Sierra Pacific of $25 million, $25 million, and $26 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Sierra Pacific provided services to NV Energy of $1 million, $— million, and $— million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Sierra Pacific's Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to NV Energy of $47 million and $19 million, respectively. There were no receivables due from NV Energy as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. In November 2022, Sierra Pacific entered into a $100 million unsecured note with NV Energy payable upon demand and $70 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Sierra Pacific's Consolidated Balance Sheets included payables due to Nevada Power of $33 million and $2 million, respectively. There were no receivables due from Nevada Power as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.


Sierra Pacific is party to a tax-sharing agreement with NV Energy and NV Energy is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021 federal income taxes receivable from NV Energy were $11 million and $— million, respectively. Sierra Pacific received cash refunds of $1 million and $3 million for federal income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and made cash payments of $2 million for federal income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2020.
(15)
Certain disbursements for accounts payable and payroll are made by NV Energy on behalf of Sierra Pacific and reimbursed automatically when settled by the bank. These amounts are recorded as accounts payable at the time of disbursement.

(18)Segment Information


Sierra Pacific has identified two reportable operating segments: regulated electric and regulated natural gas. The regulated electric segment derives most of its revenue from regulated retail sales of electricity to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and from wholesale sales. The regulated natural gas segment derives most of its revenue from regulated retail sales of natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and also obtains revenue by transporting natural gas owned by others through its distribution system. Pricing for regulated electric and regulated natural gas sales are established separately by the PUCN; therefore, management also reviews each segment separately to make decisions regarding allocation of resources and in evaluating performance.

Sierra Pacific believes presenting gross margin allows the reader to assess the impact of Sierra Pacific's regulatory treatment and its overall regulatory environment on a consistent basis and is meaningful. Gross margin is calculated as operating revenue less cost of fuel, energy and capacity and natural gas purchased for resale ("cost of sales").



The following tables provide information on a reportable segment basis (in millions):
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue:
Regulated electric$1,025 $848 $738 
Regulated natural gas168 117 116 
Total operating revenue$1,193 $965 $854 
Operating income:
Regulated electric$146 $148 $147 
Regulated natural gas19 19 18 
Total operating income165 167 165 
Interest expense(58)(54)(56)
Allowance for borrowed funds
Allowance for equity funds
Interest and dividend income18 
Other, net11 
Income before income tax expense$137 $142 $126 
388


As of December 31,
202220212020
Assets
Regulated electric$4,224 $3,829 $3,540 
Regulated natural gas441 365 342 
Regulated common assets(1)
67 29 37 
Total assets$4,732 $4,223 $3,919 

(1)    Consists principally of cash and cash equivalents not included in either the regulated electric or regulated natural gas segments.

389


Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section
390


Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Eastern Energy Gas during the periods included herein. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Eastern Energy Gas' historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. Eastern Energy Gas' actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

Results of Operations

Overview

Net income attributable to Eastern Energy Gas for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $426 million, an increase of $164 million, or 63%, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher margin from EGTS' regulated gas transmission and storage operations of $128 million, a benefit from the settlement of regulated tax matters in the Iroquois rate case and a decrease due to the settlement of depreciation rates in EGTS' general rate case, partially offset by an increase in income tax expense primarily due to higher pre-tax income.

Net income attributable to Eastern Energy Gas for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $262 million, an increase of $153 million, or 140%, compared to 2020, primarily due to a 2020 charge associated with the abandonment of a significant portion of a project in connection with the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project ("Supply Header Project") and a 2020 charge for cash flow hedges of debt-related items that were probable of not occurring as a result of the GT&S Transaction. These increases were partially offset by an increase in net income attributable to DEI's 50% noncontrolling interest in Cove Point and the November 2020 disposition of Questar Pipeline Group of $75 million, both of which were a result of the GT&S Transaction, and an increase in income tax expense primarily due to higher pre-tax income.

Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021

Operating revenue increased $136 million, or 7%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to an increase in regulated gas transmission and storage services revenues due to the settlement of EGTS' general rate case of $101 million, an increase in Cove Point LNG variable revenue of $69 million and an increase in variable revenue related to park and loan activity of $24 million, partially offset by a decrease in regulated gas sales for operational and system balancing purposes primarily due to decreased volumes of $49 million and decreased LNG service as a result of increased scheduled maintenance days of $13 million.

(Excess) cost of gas was a credit of $30 million for 2022 compared to an expense of $12 million for 2021. The change is primarily due to a decrease in volumes sold of $62 million, partially offset by an unfavorable change to operational and system balancing volumes of $20 million.

Operations and maintenance increased $15 million, or 3%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a 2021 benefit from the finalization of entries for the disallowance of capitalized AFUDC of $11 million and higher corporate charges of $11 million, partially offset by lower long-term incentive plan expenses of $8 million.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $7 million, or 2%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to the settlement of depreciation rates in EGTS' general rate case of $23 million, partially offset by higher plant placed in-service of $16 million.

Property and other taxes decreased $10 million, or 7%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower than estimated 2021 tax assessments.

Interest expense decreased $4 million, or 3%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to the repayment of $500 million of long-term debt in the second quarter of 2021.

Interest and dividend income increased $7 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to interest income from BHE GT&S' intercompany revolving credit agreement with Eastern Energy Gas.

Other, net was an expense of $1 million for 2022 compared to a credit of $1 million for 2021. The change is primarily due to losses on marketable securities.

391


Income tax expense (benefit) increased $50 million, or 43%, for 2022 compared to 2021 and the effective tax rate was 18% for 2022 and 16% for 2021. The effective tax rate increased primarily due to the revaluation of deferred taxes from changes in various state income tax rates.

Equity income increased $59 million for 2022 compared 2021, primarily due to a benefit from the settlement of regulated tax matters in the Iroquois rate case of $45 million and higher operating revenues at Iroquois due to favorable fixed negotiated rate agreements and hedges of $15 million.

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased $33 million for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to an increase in Cove Point LNG variable revenue, partially offset by decreased LNG service as a result of increased scheduled maintenance days.

Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

Operating revenue decreased $220 million, or 11%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to the November 2020 disposition of Questar Pipeline Group of $197 million and a decrease in services performed for Atlantic Coast Pipeline of $43 million, which is offset in operations and maintenance expense, partially offset by an increase in regulated gas revenues for operational and system balancing purposes primarily due to increased prices of $15 million.

Cost of gas decreased $12 million, or 50%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to a favorable change in natural gas prices of $55 million and the November 2020 disposition of Questar Pipeline Group of $3 million, partially offset by an increase in prices of natural gas sold of $49 million.

Operations and maintenance decreased $627 million, or 55%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to a 2020 charge associated with the abandonment of the Supply Header Project of $463 million, a decrease in services performed for Atlantic Coast Pipeline of $45 million, the November 2020 disposition of Questar Pipeline Group of $43 million, a 2020 charge for disallowance of capitalized AFUDC due to the resolution of EGTS' 2015 FERC audit of $43 million, the 2020 write-off of certain items in connection with the GT&S Transaction of $17 million and a 2021 benefit from the finalization of entries for the disallowance of capitalized AFUDC of $11 million.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $38 million, or 10%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due the November 2020 disposition of Questar Pipeline Group.

Property and other taxes increased $9 million, or 6%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher tax assessments.

Interest expense decreased $188 million, or 55%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to a charge in 2020 for cash flow hedges of $141 million of debt-related items that were probable of not occurring as a result of the GT&S Transaction, the November 2020 disposition of Questar Pipeline Group of $16 million and lower interest expense of $17 million from the repayment of $700 million of long-term debt in the fourth quarter of 2020 and $5 million from the repayment of $500 million of long-term debt in the second quarter of 2021.

Allowance for borrowed funds decreased $4 million, or 67%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to the 2020 abandonment of the Supply Header Project.

Allowance for equity funds decreased $6 million, or 46%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to the 2020 abandonment of the Supply Header Project.

Interest and dividend income decreased $67 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to interest income from the East Ohio Gas Company of $33 million and DEI of $32 million recognized in 2020.

Other, net decreased $41 million, or 98%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to non-service cost credits recognized in 2020 related to certain Eastern Energy Gas benefit plans that were retained by DEI as a result of the GT&S Transaction.

Income tax expense (benefit) was an expense of $117 million for 2021 compared to a benefit of $24 million for 2020. The effective tax rate was 16% in 2021 and (12)% in 2020. The effective tax rate increased primarily due to the change in the noncontrolling interest of Cove Point as a result of the GT&S Transaction, lower pre-tax income driven by charges associated with the Supply Header Project in 2020 and the finalization of the effects from the change in tax status of certain Eastern Energy Gas subsidiaries in 2020.

392


Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests increased $226 million for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to DEI's 50% noncontrolling interest in Cove Point effective with the GT&S Transaction.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas' total net liquidity was as follows (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents$65 
Intercompany revolving credit agreement(1)
400 
Total net liquidity$465 
Intercompany credit agreement:
Maturity date2023

(1)Refer to Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding Eastern Energy Gas' intercompany revolving credit agreement.
Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively. The change was primarily due to the impacts from the proposed rate increase in effect April 1, 2022 for the EGTS general rate case, timing of income tax payments and other changes in working capital, partially offset by lower collections from customers.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $1.1 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively. The change was primarily due to lower collections from affiliates, the November 2020 disposition of Questar Pipeline Group and the timing of payments of operating costs, partially offset by the settlement of interest rate swaps in 2020 and higher income tax receipts.

The timing of Eastern Energy Gas' income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods elected and assumptions made for each payment date.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $(778) million and $(486) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to higher loans to affiliates of $381 million and lower repayments of loans by affiliates of $266 million, partially offset by equity method distribution of $150 million in 2022, equity method contributions of $154 million in 2021 and a decrease in capital expenditures of $55 million.

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $(486) million and $3.1 billion, respectively. The change was primarily due to lower repayments of loans by affiliates of $3.1 billion, loans to affiliates of $183 million and higher funding of equity method investments of $152 million.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $(515) million and consisted of distributions to noncontrolling interests from Cove Point.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $(615) million. Sources of cash totaled $346 million and consisted of proceeds from equity contributions, that included a contribution from its indirect parent, BHE, to Eastern Energy Gas to assist in the repayment of $500 million of debt. Uses of cash totaled $961 million and consisted mainly of repayments of long-term debt of $500 million, distributions to noncontrolling interests from Cove Point of $450 million and repayment of notes to affiliates of $9 million.

393


Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $(4.3) billion. Sources of cash totaled $1.2 billion and consisted of proceeds from equity contributions, that included a contribution from its indirect parent BHE to Eastern Energy Gas to repay its $700 million of debt. Uses of cash totaled $5.5 billion and consisted mainly of distributions of $4.5 billion, repayments of long-term debt of $700 million and net repayments of affiliated current borrowings of $251 million as required by the GT&S Transaction.

Future Uses of Cash

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, new growth projects and the timing of growth projects; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital.

Eastern Energy Gas' historical and forecasted capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Natural gas transmission and storage$112 $16 $43 $15 $46 $147 
Other262 426 344 336 285 245 
Total$374 $442 $387 $351 $331 $392 

Eastern Energy Gas' natural gas transmission and storage capital expenditures primarily include growth capital expenditures related to planned regulated projects. Eastern Energy Gas' other capital expenditures consist primarily of nonregulated and routine capital expenditures for natural gas transmission, storage and LNG terminalling infrastructure needed to serve existing and expected demand.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Eastern Energy Gas has certain investments that are accounted for under the equity method in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, an amount is recorded on Eastern Energy Gas' Consolidated Balance Sheets as an equity investment and is increased or decreased for Eastern Energy Gas' pro-rata share of earnings or losses, respectively, less any dividends from such investments.

As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas' investments that are accounted for under the equity method had short- and long-term debt of $307 million and an unused revolving credit facility of $10 million. As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas' pro-rata share of such short- and long-term debt was $154 million and unused revolving credit facility was $5 million. The entire amount of Eastern Energy Gas' pro-rata share of the outstanding short- and long-term debt and unused revolving credit facility is non-recourse to Eastern Energy Gas. Although Eastern Energy Gas is generally not required to support debt service obligations of its equity investees, default with respect to this non-recourse short- and long-term debt could result in a loss of invested equity.

394


Material Cash Requirements

The following table summarizes Eastern Energy Gas' material cash requirements as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):

Payments Due by Periods
20232024-20252026-20272028 and thereafterTotal
Interest payments on long-term debt(1)
$136 $205 $164 $1,012 $1,517 
Natural gas supply and transmission(1)
49 98 98 — 245 
Total cash requirements$185 $303 $262 $1,012 $1,762 
(1)Not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In addition, Eastern Energy Gas also has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise from long-term debt (refer to Note 8), construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7), uncertain tax positions (refer to Note 9) and AROs (refer to Note 11). Refer, where applicable, to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K for additional information.

Regulatory Matters

Eastern Energy Gas is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding Eastern Energy Gas' general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

Eastern Energy Gas is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. Eastern Energy Gas believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and Eastern Energy Gas is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt of Eastern Energy Gas is rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of Eastern Energy Gas' ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.

Eastern Energy Gas has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments.

395


Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where Eastern Energy Gas operates have not had a significant impact on Eastern Energy Gas' consolidated financial results. Eastern Energy Gas and its subsidiaries primarily operate under cost-of-service based rate-setting structures administered by the FERC. Under these rate-setting structures, Eastern Energy Gas is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation. Eastern Energy Gas attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by Eastern Energy Gas' methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with Eastern Energy Gas' Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Eastern Energy Gas' Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Eastern Energy Gas prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Eastern Energy Gas defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

Eastern Energy Gas continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Eastern Energy Gas' ability to recover its costs. Eastern Energy Gas believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at the federal level. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $48 million and total regulatory liabilities were $722 million as of December 31, 2022. Refer to Eastern Energy Gas' Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Eastern Energy Gas' regulatory assets and liabilities.

Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

Eastern Energy Gas' Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022 includes goodwill of acquired businesses of $1.3 billion. Eastern Energy Gas evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31, 2022. Additionally, no indicators of impairment were identified as of December 31, 2022. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. Eastern Energy Gas uses a variety of methods to estimate a reporting unit's fair value, principally discounted projected future net cash flows. Key assumptions used include, but are not limited to, the use of estimated future cash flows; multiples of earnings; and an appropriate discount rate. Estimated future cash flows are impacted by, among other factors, growth rates, changes in regulations and rates, ability to renew contracts and estimates of future commodity prices. In estimating future cash flows, Eastern Energy Gas incorporates current market information, as well as historical factors.

396


Eastern Energy Gas evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the purposes of impairment analysis, requires the exercise of judgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of fair value or the recoverable amount of an asset may include significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect Eastern Energy Gas' results of operations.

Income Taxes

In determining Eastern Energy Gas' income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by the FERC. Eastern Energy Gas' income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. Eastern Energy Gas recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of Eastern Energy Gas' federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, Eastern Energy Gas believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on Eastern Energy Gas' consolidated financial results. Refer to Eastern Energy Gas' Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Eastern Energy Gas' income taxes.

It is probable that Eastern Energy Gas will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to their customers. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $406 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Eastern Energy Gas' Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. Eastern Energy Gas' significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates, foreign currency and the extension of credit to counterparties with which Eastern Energy Gas transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with Eastern Energy Gas' business activities. Eastern Energy Gas has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding Eastern Energy Gas' contracts accounted for as derivatives.

Commodity Price Risk

Eastern Energy Gas is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices. Eastern Energy Gas is principally exposed to natural gas market fluctuations primarily through fuel retained and used during the operation of the pipeline system as well as lost and unaccounted for gas. Eastern Energy Gas is exposed to the risk of fuel retention, meaning customers have a fixed fuel retention percentage assessed on transmission and storage quantities, and the pipeline bears the risk of under-recovery and benefits from any over-recovery of volumes. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, facility availability, customer usage, storage and transmission constraints. Eastern Energy Gas does not engage in proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Eastern Energy Gas uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply quantities or sell future supply quantities generally at fixed prices. Eastern Energy Gas does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. As of February 2023, all of Eastern Energy Gas' regulated operations recover their cost of gas through fuel trackers and are no longer subject to significant commodity price risk.
397



Interest Rate Risk

Eastern Energy Gas is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. Eastern Energy Gas manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, Eastern Energy Gas' fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose Eastern Energy Gas to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if Eastern Energy Gas were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of Eastern Energy Gas' short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Note 8 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of Eastern Energy Gas' long-term debt.

Eastern Energy Gas holds foreign currency swaps with the purpose of hedging the foreign currency exchange risk associated with Euro denominated debt. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Eastern Energy Gas had €250 million in aggregate notional amounts of these foreign currency swaps outstanding. A hypothetical 10% decrease in market interest rates would not have resulted in a material decrease in fair value of Eastern Energy Gas' foreign currency swaps as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

The impact of a change in interest rates on the Eastern Energy Gas' interest rate-based financial derivative instruments at a point in time is not necessarily representative of the results that will be realized when the contracts are ultimately settled. Net gains and/or losses from interest rate derivative instruments used for hedging purposes, to the extent realized, will generally be offset by recognition of the hedged transaction.

Credit Risk

Eastern Energy Gas is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with natural gas transmission and storage service contracts with utilities, natural gas producers, power generators, industrials, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Eastern Energy Gas' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Eastern Energy Gas analyzes the financial condition of each wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate counterparty credit risk, Eastern Energy Gas obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit, financial guarantee bonds and cash deposits. If required, Eastern Energy Gas exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

Eastern Energy Gas' gross credit exposure for each counterparty is calculated as outstanding receivables plus any unrealized on- or off-balance sheet exposure, taking into account contractual netting rights. Gross credit exposure is calculated prior to the application of collateral. As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas' credit exposure totaled $90 million. Of this amount, investment grade counterparties, including those internally rated, represented 98%, with three investment grade counterparties representing 57%.
398


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

399


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and subsidiaries ("Eastern Energy Gas") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Eastern Energy Gas as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of Eastern Energy Gas' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Eastern Energy Gas' financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to Eastern Energy Gas in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Eastern Energy Gas is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of Eastern Energy Gas' internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 6 to the Financial Statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

Eastern Energy Gas, through its subsidiaries, is subject to rate regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (the "FERC"), which has jurisdiction with respect to the rates of interstate natural gas transmission companies. Management has determined its rate regulated subsidiaries meet the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accounting for the economics of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

400


Revenue provided by the Eastern Energy Gas interstate natural gas transmission operations is based primarily on rates approved by the FERC. Eastern Energy Gas defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur. Eastern Energy Gas continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit Eastern Energy Gas' ability to recover its costs. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).

We identified the effects of rate regulation on the financial statements as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of future regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the FERC, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of the accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by the FERC included the following, among others:
We evaluated the Eastern Energy Gas disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the FERC, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected Eastern Energy Gas' filings with the FERC, and the filings with the FERC by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedents of the FERC's treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Richmond, Virginia
February 24, 2023

We have served as Eastern Energy Gas' auditor since 2012.
401


EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$65 $22 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents30 17 
Trade receivables, net202 183 
Receivables from affiliates30 47 
Notes receivable from affiliates536 
Inventories127 122 
Prepayments78 76 
Natural gas imbalances193 100 
Other current assets42 47 
Total current assets1,303 621 
Property, plant and equipment, net10,202 10,200 
Goodwill1,286 1,286 
Investments278 412 
Other assets95 129 
Total assets$13,164 $12,648 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
402


EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$86 $79 
Accounts payable to affiliates10 38 
Accrued interest19 19 
Accrued property, income and other taxes77 89 
Accrued employee expenses14 13 
Regulatory liabilities126 40 
Asset retirement obligations25 33 
Current portion of long-term debt649 — 
Other current liabilities107 54 
Total current liabilities1,113 365 
Long-term debt3,243 3,906 
Regulatory liabilities596 645 
Other long-term liabilities324 238 
Total liabilities5,276 5,154 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Equity:
Member's equity:
Membership interests3,983 3,501 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(42)(43)
Total member's equity3,941 3,458 
Noncontrolling interests3,947 4,036 
Total equity7,888 7,494 
  
Total liabilities and equity$13,164 $12,648 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
403


EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue$2,006 $1,870 $2,090 
  
Operating expenses: 
(Excess) cost of gas(30)12 24 
Operations and maintenance530 515 1,142 
Depreciation and amortization321 328 366 
Property and other taxes139 149 140 
Total operating expenses960 1,004 1,672 
   
Operating income1,046 866 418 
  
Other income (expense): 
Interest expense(147)(151)(339)
Allowance for borrowed funds
Allowance for equity funds13 
Interest and dividend income— 67 
Other, net(1)42 
Total other income (expense)(133)(141)(211)
   
Income before income tax expense (benefit) and equity income913 725 207 
Income tax expense (benefit)167 117 (24)
Equity income103 44 42 
Net income849 652 273 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests423 390 164 
Net income attributable to Eastern Energy Gas$426 $262 $109 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
404


EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income$849 $652 $273 
 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax:
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $—, $— and $4094 
Unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $—, $1 and $10(1)30 
Total other comprehensive income, net of tax15 124 
    
Comprehensive income853 667 397 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests426 395 154 
Comprehensive income attributable to Eastern Energy Gas$427 $272 $243 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
405


EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)

Accumulated
Other
MembershipComprehensiveNoncontrollingTotal
InterestsLoss, NetInterestsEquity
Balance, December 31, 2019$9,031 $(187)$1,385 $10,229 
Net income109 — 164 273 
Other comprehensive income (loss)— 134 (10)124 
Distributions(4,282)— (216)(4,498)
Contributions1,223 — — 1,223 
Distribution of Questar Pipeline Group(699)— — (699)
Distribution of 50% interest in Cove Point(2,765)— 2,765 — 
Acquisition of Eastern Energy Gas by BHE343 — — 343 
Other equity transactions(3)— — 
Balance, December 31, 20202,957 (53)4,091 6,995 
Net income262 — 390 652 
Other comprehensive income— 10 15 
Distributions(137)— (450)(587)
Contributions419 — — 419 
Balance, December 31, 20213,501 (43)4,036 7,494 
Net income426 — 423 849 
Other comprehensive income— 
Distributions(42)— (515)(557)
Contributions98 — — 98 
Balance, December 31, 2022$3,983 $(42)$3,947 $7,888 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
406


EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income$849 $652 $273 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:
Losses (gains) on other items, net(3)531 
Depreciation and amortization321 328 366 
Allowance for equity funds(6)(7)(13)
Equity (income) loss, net of distributions(58)— 35 
Changes in regulatory assets and liabilities56 (20)(37)
Deferred income taxes126 186 (5)
Other, net(19)23 
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(77)346 
Derivative collateral, net(1)10 (140)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans— — (88)
Accrued property, income and other taxes27 (30)23 
Accounts payable and other liabilities99 (12)(40)
Net cash flows from operating activities1,349 1,092 1,274 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(387)(442)(374)
Loans to affiliates(564)(183)— 
Repayment of loans by affiliates39 305 3,422 
Equity method investments150 (154)(2)
Other, net(16)(12)18 
Net cash flows from investing activities(778)(486)3,064 
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayments of long-term debt— (500)(700)
Net (repayments of) proceeds from short-term debt— — (62)
Repayment of affiliated current borrowings, net— (9)(251)
Proceeds from equity contributions— 346 1,223 
Distributions to parent— — (4,323)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(515)(450)(216)
Other, net— (2)— 
Net cash flows from financing activities(515)(615)(4,329)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents56 (9)
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period39 48 39 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$95 $39 $48 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
407


EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)Organization and Operations

Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC is a holding company, and together with its subsidiaries ("Eastern Energy Gas") conducts business activities consisting of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC")-regulated interstate natural gas transmission pipeline and underground storage operations in the eastern region of the U.S. and operates Cove Point LNG, LP ("Cove Point"), a liquefied natural gas ("LNG") export, import and storage facility. Eastern Energy Gas owns 100% of the general partner interest and 25% of the limited partnership interest in Cove Point. In addition, Eastern Energy Gas owns a 50% noncontrolling interest in Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. ("Iroquois"), a 416-mile FERC-regulated interstate natural gas transmission pipeline. On November 1, 2020, Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE") completed its acquisition of substantially all of the natural gas transmission and storage business of Dominion Energy, Inc. ("DEI") (the "GT&S Transaction"). As a result of the GT&S Transaction, Eastern Energy Gas became an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of BHE. BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in the energy industry. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway"). See Note 3 for more information regarding the GT&S Transaction.

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Eastern Energy Gas and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Eastern Energy Gas consolidates variable interest entities ("VIE") in which it possesses both (i) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; impairment of goodwill; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

Eastern Energy Gas prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, Eastern Energy Gas defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

408


Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Alternative valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of customer deposits as allowed under the FERC gas tariffs. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$65 $22 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents30 17 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$95 $39 

Investments

Eastern Energy Gas utilizes the equity method of accounting with respect to investments when it possesses the ability to exercise significant influence, but not control, over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The ability to exercise significant influence is presumed when the investor possesses more than 20% of the voting interests of the investee. This presumption may be overcome based on specific facts and circumstances that demonstrate that the ability to exercise significant influence is restricted. In applying the equity method, Eastern Energy Gas records the investment at cost and subsequently increases or decreases the carrying value of the investment by Eastern Energy Gas' share of the net earnings or losses and other comprehensive income ("OCI") of the investee. Eastern Energy Gas records dividends or other equity distributions as reductions in the carrying value of the investment.

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on Eastern Energy Gas' assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to Eastern Energy Gas by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, Eastern Energy Gas primarily evaluates the financial condition of the individual customer and the nature of any disputed amount.

The changes in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trades receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$$$
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net— 
Write-offs, net(3)— (1)
Ending balance$$$

409


  Years Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:      
Regulated electric $713
 $702
 $810
Regulated gas 99
 110
 137
Total operating revenue $812
 $812
 $947
       
Cost of sales:      
Regulated electric $268
 $265
 $374
Regulated gas 42
 55
 84
Total cost of sales $310
 $320
 $458
       
Gross margin:      
Regulated electric $445
 $437
 $436
Regulated gas 57
 55
 53
Total gross margin $502
 $492
 $489
       
Operating and maintenance:      
Regulated electric $148
 $153
 $149
Regulated gas 18
 17
 18
Total operating and maintenance $166
 $170
 $167
       
Depreciation and amortization:      
Regulated electric $100
 $101
 $96
Regulated gas 14
 17
 17
Total depreciation and amortization $114
 $118
 $113
       
Operating income:      
Regulated electric $176
 $161
 $168
Regulated gas 22
 19
 16
Total operating income $198
 $180
 $184
       
Interest expense:      
Regulated electric $39
 $49
 $56
Regulated gas 4
 5
 5
Total interest expense $43
 $54
 $61
       
Income tax expense:      
Regulated electric $48
 $44
 $43
Regulated gas 7
 5
 4
Total income tax expense $55
 $49
 $47
Derivatives



Eastern Energy Gas employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price, interest rate, and foreign currency exchange rate risk. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements. Cash collateral received from or paid to counterparties to secure derivative contract assets or liabilities in excess of amounts offset is included in other current assets or other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked-to-market and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of gas on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For Eastern Energy Gas' derivatives not designated as hedging contracts, unrealized gains and losses are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as operating revenue for derivatives related to natural gas sales contracts.

For Eastern Energy Gas' derivatives designated as hedging contracts, Eastern Energy Gas formally assesses, at inception and thereafter, whether the hedging contract is highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged item. Eastern Energy Gas formally documents hedging activity by transaction type and risk management strategy. For derivative instruments that are accounted for as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges, the cash flows from the derivatives and from the related hedged items are classified in operating cash flows.

Changes in the estimated fair value of a derivative contract designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge, to the extent effective, are included on the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity as AOCI, net of tax, until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Eastern Energy Gas discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it has determined that a derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, or when it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur. When hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, future changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative contract are charged to earnings. Gains and losses related to discontinued hedges that were previously recorded in AOCI will remain in AOCI until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings, unless it becomes probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur at which time associated deferred amounts in AOCI are immediately recognized in earnings.

Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of materials and supplies and are determined using the average cost method.

Natural Gas Imbalances

Natural gas imbalances occur when the physical amount of natural gas delivered from, or received by, a pipeline system or storage facility differs from the contractual amount of natural gas delivered or received. Eastern Energy Gas values these imbalances due to, or from, shippers and operators at an appropriate index price at period end, subject to the terms of its tariff for regulated entities. Imbalances are primarily settled in-kind. Imbalances due to Eastern Energy Gas from other parties are reported in natural gas imbalances and imbalances that Eastern Energy Gas owes to other parties are reported in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Eastern Energy Gas capitalizes all construction-related materials, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include capitalized interest, including debt allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), and equity AFUDC, as applicable. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed.

410


  Years Ended December 31,
  2017 2016 2015
Capital expenditures:      
Regulated electric $169
 $176
 $229
Regulated gas 17
 18
 23
Total capital expenditures $186
 $194
 $252
       
  As of December 31,
Total assets: 2017 2016 2015
Regulated electric $3,103
 $3,119
 $3,060
Regulated gas 300
 314
 316
Regulated common assets(1)
 10
 60
 111
Total assets $3,413
 $3,493
 $3,487
Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. Depreciation studies are completed by Eastern Energy Gas to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the FERC. See Note 6 for the prospective impacts related to changes in depreciation rates. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.


Generally when Eastern Energy Gas retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, is capitalized by Eastern Energy Gas as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the FERC. After construction is completed, Eastern Energy Gas is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.

Asset Retirement Obligations

Eastern Energy Gas recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. Eastern Energy Gas' AROs are primarily related to the obligations associated with its natural gas pipeline and storage well assets. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. For Eastern Energy Gas, the difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.

Impairment

Eastern Energy Gas evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets. See Note 6 for more information.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations. Eastern Energy Gas evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31, 2022. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, Eastern Energy Gas estimates the fair value of its reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the estimated fair value, then the excess is charged to earnings as an impairment loss. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. The determination of fair value incorporates significant unobservable inputs. During 2022, 2021 and 2020, Eastern Energy Gas did not record any goodwill impairments.

Eastern Energy Gas records goodwill adjustments for changes to the purchase price allocation prior to the end of the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date.

411


Revenue Recognition

Eastern Energy Gas uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which Eastern Energy Gas expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Eastern Energy Gas records sales and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

A majority of Eastern Energy Gas' Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by the FERC. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of natural gas transmission and storage services and have performance obligations which are satisfied over time as services are provided. Eastern Energy Gas' revenue that is nonregulated primarily relates to LNG terminalling services.

Revenue recognized is equal to the value to the customer of Eastern Energy Gas' performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $18 million and $36 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued. See Note 6 for discussion surrounding the Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. ("EGTS") provision for rate refund. In the event one of the parties to a contract has performed before the other, Eastern Energy Gas would recognize a contract asset or contract liability depending on the relationship between Eastern Energy Gas' performance and the customer's payment. Eastern Energy Gas has recognized contract assets of $10 million and $19 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $80 million and $18 million of contract liabilities as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, due to Eastern Energy Gas' performance on certain contracts.

Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Debt Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, DEI included Eastern Energy Gas in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction, Berkshire Hathaway includes Eastern Energy Gas in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, Eastern Energy Gas' provision for income taxes has been computed on a stand-alone basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of OCI are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that Eastern Energy Gas' regulated businesses deems probable to be passed on to its customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

Eastern Energy Gas recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense (benefit) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Segment Information

Eastern Energy Gas currently has one segment, which includes its natural gas pipeline, storage and LNG operations.
412


(3)    Business Acquisitions and Dispositions

Acquisition of Eastern Energy Gas by BHE

In July 2020, DEI entered into an agreement to sell substantially all of its natural gas transmission and storage operations, including Eastern Energy Gas and a 25% limited partnership interest in Cove Point, to BHE. Approval of the transaction under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act was not obtained within 75 days and DEI and BHE mutually agreed to a dual-phase closing consisting of two separate disposal groups identified as the GT&S Transaction and the proposed sale of Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline, LLC and related entities ("the Questar Pipeline Group") by DEI to BHE pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement entered into on October 5, 2020 ("Q-Pipe Transaction"). In July 2021, Dominion Energy Questar Corporation ("Dominion Questar") and DEI delivered a written notice to BHE stating that BHE and Dominion Questar mutually elected to terminate the Q-Pipe Transaction. Prior to the completion of the GT&S Transaction, Eastern Energy Gas finalized a restructuring whereby Eastern Energy Gas distributed the Questar Pipeline Group and a 50% noncontrolling interest in Cove Point to DEI. This restructuring was accounted for by Eastern Energy Gas as a reorganization of entities under common control and the disposition was reflected as an equity transaction. The disposition was not reported as a discontinued operation as the disposal did not represent a strategic shift in the way management had intended to run the business.

In November 2020, the GT&S Transaction was completed and Eastern Energy Gas, with the exception of the Questar Pipeline Group as discussed above, became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of BHE. DEI retained a 50% noncontrolling interest in Cove Point as well as the assets and obligations of the pension and other postretirement employee benefit plans associated with the operations sold and relating to services provided before closing. The GT&S Transaction was treated as a deemed asset sale for federal and state income tax purposes and all deferred taxes at Eastern Energy Gas were reset to reflect financial and tax basis differences as of November 1, 2020. See Notes 9 and 16 for more information on the GT&S Transaction.

Eastern Energy Gas recorded a distribution of net assets of $699 million, including goodwill of $185 million and $41 million of cash, for the distribution of the Questar Pipeline Group to DEI and recorded an approximately $2.8 billion increase in noncontrolling interests for DEI's retained 50% noncontrolling interest in Cove Point. Additionally, in accordance with the terms of the GT&S Transaction, DEI retained certain assets and liabilities associated with Eastern Energy Gas and settled all affiliated balances. As a result, Eastern Energy Gas recorded a contribution for the reset of deferred taxes of $1.3 billion, net of distributions of $895 million related to the pension and other postretirement employee benefit plans retained by DEI and $107 million related to the settlement of affiliated balances.
413


(4)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Utility Plant:
Interstate natural gas pipeline and storage assets21 - 52 years$8,922 $8,675 
Intangible plant5 - 18 years113 110 
Utility plant in-service9,035 8,785 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(3,039)(2,901)
Utility plant in-service, net5,996 5,884 
Nonutility Plant:
LNG facility40 years4,522 4,475 
Intangible plant14 years25 25 
Nonutility plant4,547 4,500 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(542)(423)
Nonutility plant, net4,005 4,077 
10,001 9,961 
Construction work- in-progress201 239 
Property, plant and equipment, net$10,202 $10,200 

Construction work-in-progress includes $181 million and $209 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, related to the construction of utility plant.

(5)    Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements with other utilities, Eastern Energy Gas, as a tenant in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned transmission and storage facilities. Eastern Energy Gas accounts for its proportionate share of each facility, and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners primarily based on their percentage of ownership. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include Eastern Energy Gas' share of the expenses of these facilities.

The amounts shown in the table below represent Eastern Energy Gas' share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):

AccumulatedConstruction
Eastern Energy Gas'Facility inDepreciation andWork-in-
ShareServiceAmortizationProgress
Ellisburg Pool39 %$32 $11 $— 
Ellisburg Station50 26 
Harrison50 53 18 — 
Leidy50 143 47 
Oakford50 202 70 
Tioga56 69 30 
Total$456 $154 $

414


(6)    Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future regulated rates. Eastern Energy Gas' regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted Average Remaining Life20222021
Employee benefit plans(1)
11 years$32 $62 
OtherVarious16 12 
Total regulatory assets$48 $74 
Reflected as:
Other current assets$$
Other assets40 68 
Total regulatory assets$48 $74 

(1)Represents costs expected to be recovered through future rates generally over the expected remaining service period of plan participants by certain rate-regulated subsidiaries.

Eastern Energy Gas had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $44 million and $8 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

415


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent income to be recognized or amounts expected to be returned to customers in future periods. Eastern Energy Gas' regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted Average Remaining Life20222021
Income taxes refundable through future rates(1)
Various$406 $468 
Other postretirement benefit costs(2)
Various123 116 
Provision for rate refunds(3)
90 — 
Cost of removal(4)
53 years82 73 
OtherVarious21 28 
Total regulatory liabilities$722 $685 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$126 $40 
Noncurrent liabilities596 645 
Total regulatory liabilities$722 $685 

(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(2)Reflects a regulatory liability for the collection of postretirement benefit costs allowed in rates in excess of expense incurred.
(3)Reflects amounts expected to be refunded to customers in late February 2023 in connection with the EGTS rate case. See below for more information.
(4)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Refer to Note 11 for more information.

Regulatory Matters

Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.

In September 2021, EGTS filed a general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective November 1, 2021. EGTS' previous general rate case was settled in 1998. EGTS proposed an annual cost-of-service of approximately $1.1 billion, and requested increases in various rates, including general system storage rates by 85% and general system transmission rates by 60%. In October 2021, the FERC issued an order that accepted the November 1, 2021 effective date for certain changes in rates, while suspending the other changes for five months following the proposed effective date, until April 1, 2022, subject to refund. In September 2022, a settlement agreement was filed with the FERC, resolving EGTS' general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services and providing for increased service rates and decreased depreciation rates. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, EGTS' rates result in an increase to annual firm transmission and storage revenues of approximately $160 million and a decrease in annual depreciation expense of approximately $30 million, compared to the rates in effect prior to April 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, EGTS' provision for rate refund for April 2022 through December 2022 totaled $90 million and was included in current regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In November 2022, the FERC approved the settlement agreement.

416


In July 2017, the FERC audit staff communicated to EGTS that it had substantially completed an audit of EGTS' compliance with the accounting and reporting requirements of the FERC's Uniform System of Accounts and provided a description of matters and preliminary recommendations. In November 2017, the FERC audit staff issued its audit report. In December 2017, EGTS provided its response to the audit report. EGTS requested FERC review of the contested findings and submitted its plan for compliance with the uncontested portions of the report. EGTS reached resolution of certain matters with the FERC in the fourth quarter of 2018. EGTS recognized a charge for a disallowance of plant, originally established beginning in 2012, for the resolution of one matter with the FERC. In December 2020, the FERC issued a final ruling on the remaining matter, which resulted in a $43 million ($31 million after-tax) estimated charge for disallowance of capitalized AFUDC, recorded within operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As a condition of the December 2020 ruling, EGTS filed its proposed accounting entries and supporting documentation with the FERC during the second quarter of 2021. During the finalization of these entries, EGTS refined the estimated charge for disallowance of capitalized AFUDC, which resulted in a reduction to the estimated charge of $11 million ($8 million after-tax) that was recorded in operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the second quarter of 2021. In September 2021, the FERC approved EGTS' accounting entries and supporting documentation.

In December 2014, EGTS entered into a precedent agreement with Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC ("Atlantic Cost Pipeline") for the project previously intended for EGTS to provide approximately 1,500,000 decatherms ("Dth") of firm transmission service to various customers in connection with the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project ("Supply Header Project"). As a result of the cancellation of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project, in the second quarter of 2020 Eastern Energy Gas recorded a charge of $482 million ($359 million after-tax) in operations and maintenance expense in its Consolidated Statement of Operations associated with the probable abandonment of a significant portion of the project as well as the establishment of a $75 million ARO. In the third quarter of 2020, Eastern Energy Gas recorded an additional charge of $10 million ($7 million after-tax) associated with the probable abandonment of a significant portion of the project and a $29 million ($20 million after-tax) benefit from a revision to the previously established ARO, both of which were recorded in operations and maintenance expense in Eastern Energy Gas' Consolidated Statement of Operations. As EGTS evaluates its future use, approximately $40 million remains within property, plant and equipment for a potential modified project.

Cove Point

In January 2020, pursuant to the terms of a previous settlement, Cove Point filed a general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective March 1, 2020. Cove Point proposed an annual cost-of-service of $182 million. In February 2020, FERC approved suspending the changes in rates for five months following the proposed effective date, until August 1, 2020, subject to refund. In November 2020, Cove Point reached an agreement in principle with the active participants in the general rate case proceeding.Under the terms of the agreement in principle, Cove Point's rates effective August 1, 2020 resulted in an increase to annual revenues of $4 million and a decrease in annual depreciation expense of $1 million, compared to the rates in effect prior to August 1, 2020.The interim settlement rates were implemented November 1, 2020, and Cove Point's provision for rate refunds for August 2020 through October 2020 totaled $7 million. The agreement in principle was reflected in a stipulation and agreement filed with the FERC in January 2021. In March 2021, the FERC approved the stipulation and agreement and the rate refunds to customers were processed in late April 2021.

417


(7)    Investments and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):

20222021
Investments:
Investment funds$14 $13 
Equity method investments:
Iroquois264 399 
Total investments278 412 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents:
Customer deposits30 17 
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents30 17 
Total investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents$308 $429 
Reflected as:
Current assets$30 $17 
Noncurrent assets278 412 
Total investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents$308 $429 

Equity Method Investments

Eastern Energy Gas, through subsidiaries, owns 50% of Iroquois, which owns and operates an interstate natural gas pipeline located in the states of New York and Connecticut. Prior to the GT&S Transaction, Eastern Energy Gas, through the Questar Pipeline Group, owned 50% of White River Hub, which owns and operates a natural gas pipeline in northwest Colorado.

As of both December 31, 2022 and 2021, the carrying amount of Eastern Energy Gas' investments exceeded its share of underlying equity in net assets by $130 million. The difference reflects equity method goodwill and is not being amortized. Eastern Energy Gas made contributions of $154 million in 2021. Eastern Energy Gas received distributions from its investments of $195 million, $44 million and $77 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. In the third quarter of 2022, in connection with the settlement of regulated tax matters in the Iroquois rate case, Eastern Energy Gas released a long-term regulatory liability and recognized a $45 million benefit that was recorded in equity income in its Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(8)    Long-term Debt

On June 30, 2021, as part of an intercompany transaction with its wholly owned subsidiary EGTS, Eastern Energy Gas exchanged a total of $1.6 billion of its issued and outstanding third party notes, making EGTS the primary obligor of the exchanged notes. The intercompany debt exchange was a common control transaction accounted for as a debt modification with no gain or loss recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

418


Eastern Energy Gas' long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars and euros in millions):
Par Value20222021
Eastern Energy Gas:
2.875% Senior Notes, due 2023$250 $250 $250 
3.55% Senior Notes, due 2023400 399 399 
2.50% Senior Notes, due 2024600 598 597 
3.60% Senior Notes, due 2024339 338 338 
3.32% Senior Notes, due 2026 (€250)(1)
268 267 283 
3.00% Senior Notes, due 2029174 173 173 
3.80% Senior Notes, due 2031150 150 150 
4.80% Senior Notes, due 204354 53 53 
4.60% Senior Notes, due 204456 56 56 
3.90% Senior Notes, due 204927 26 26 
EGTS:
3.60% Senior Notes, due 2024111 110 110 
3.00% Senior Notes, due 2029426 422 422 
4.80% Senior Notes, due 2043346 342 341 
4.60% Senior Notes, due 2044444 437 437 
3.90% Senior Notes, due 2049273 271 271 
Total long-term debt$3,918 $3,892 $3,906 
Reflected as:
Current portion of long-term debt$649 $— 
Long-term debt3,243 3,906 
Total long-term debt$3,892 $3,906 
(1)The senior notes are denominated in Euros with an outstanding principal balance of €250 million and a fixed interest rate of 1.45%. Eastern Energy Gas has entered into cross currency swaps that fix USD payments for 100% of the notes. The fixed USD outstanding principal when combined with the swaps is $280 million, with fixed interest rates as of both December 31, 2022 and 2021 that averaged 3.32%.
Annual Payment on Long-Term Debt

The annual repayments of long-term debt for the years beginning January 1, 2023 and thereafter, are as follows (in millions):

2023$650 
20241,050 
2025— 
2026268 
2027— 
2028 and thereafter1,950 
Total3,918 
Unamortized premium, discount and debt issuance cost(26)
Total$3,892 

419


(9)    Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Current:
Federal$12 $(47)$(20)
State29 (21)
41 (68)(19)
Deferred:
Federal88 129 23 
State38 56 (28)
126 185 (5)
Total$167 $117 $(24)

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax expense (benefit) is as follows for the years ended December 31:

202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit(13)
Equity interest
Effects of ratemaking(1)(2)
Change in tax status— — (9)
AFUDC-equity— — (1)
Noncontrolling interest(10)(11)(16)
Write-off of regulatory assets— — 
Other, net— 
Effective income tax rate18 %16 %(12)%

For the year ended December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas' reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate is driven primarily by the absence of tax on noncontrolling interest.

420


The net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):

20222021
Deferred income tax assets:
Federal and state carryforwards$23 $
Employee benefits22 33 
Intangibles112 150 
Derivatives and hedges16 16 
Other
Total deferred income tax assets180 215 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property related items(214)(129)
Partnership investments(51)(49)
Debt exchange(53)(60)
Deferred state income taxes(4)(16)
Other(12)(16)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(334)(270)
Net deferred income tax liability(1)
$(154)$(55)

(1)Net deferred income tax liability, as of both December 31, 2022 and 2021, is presented in other assets and other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas' state tax carryforwards, entirely related to $23 million of net operating losses, expire at various intervals between 2036 and indefinite.

Through October 31, 2020, Eastern Energy Gas was included in DEI's consolidated federal income tax return and, where applicable, combined state income tax returns. As a result of the GT&S Transaction, DEI retained the rights and obligations of Eastern Energy Gas' federal and state income tax returns through October 31, 2020. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has not closed or effectively settled an examination of Eastern Energy Gas' income tax returns for any tax years beginning on or after November 1, 2020. The statute of limitations for Eastern Energy Gas' states remains open for periods beginning on or after November 1, 2020. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, for state filings may not preclude the state from adjusting the state net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(10)    Employee Benefit Plans

As discussed in Note 3, in November 2020, the GT&S Transaction was completed and the assets and obligations of the pension and other postretirement employee benefit plans associated with the operations sold and relating to services provided before closing were retained by DEI. As a result, just prior to completing the sale, net benefit plan assets of $895 million were distributed through an equity transaction with DEI.

421


Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction

Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction, Eastern Energy Gas is a participant in benefit plans sponsored by MidAmerican Energy Company ("MidAmerican Energy"), an affiliate. The MidAmerican Energy Company Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan ("Qualified Pension Plan") that provides pension benefits for eligible employees. The MidAmerican Energy Company Welfare Benefit Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees ("Other Postretirement Plans") on behalf of Eastern Energy Gas. Eastern Energy Gas made $14 million, $18 million and $3 million of contributions to the MidAmerican Energy Company Retirement Plan for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Eastern Energy Gas made $2 million, $10 million and $2 million of contributions to the MidAmerican Energy Company Welfare Benefit Plan for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Contributions related to these plans are reflected as net periodic benefit cost in operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amounts attributable to Eastern Energy Gas were allocated from MidAmerican Energy in accordance with the intercompany administrative service agreement. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates. Net periodic benefit costs not included in regulated rates are included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net.

Eastern Energy Gas participates in the BHE GT&S, LLC ("BHE GT&S") defined contribution employee savings plan subsequent to the GT&S Transaction. Eastern Energy Gas' matching contributions are based on each participant's level of contribution. Contributions cannot exceed the maximum allowable for tax purposes. Eastern Energy Gas' contributions to the 401(k) plan were $6 million, $5 million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Prior to the GT&S Transaction

Defined Benefit Plans

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, certain Eastern Energy Gas employees not represented by collective bargaining units were covered by the Dominion Energy Pension Plan, a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by DEI that provides benefits to multiple DEI subsidiaries. As participating employers, Eastern Energy Gas was subject to DEI's funding policy, which was to contribute annually an amount that is in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. Eastern Energy Gas' net periodic pension credit related to this plan was $14 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Net periodic pension credit is reflected in other operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The funded status of various DEI subsidiary groups and employee compensation are the basis for determining the share of total pension costs for participating DEI subsidiaries.

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, certain retiree healthcare and life insurance benefits for Eastern Energy Gas employees not represented by collective bargaining units were covered by the Dominion Energy Retiree Health and Welfare Plan, a plan sponsored by DEI that provides certain retiree healthcare and life insurance benefits to multiple DEI subsidiaries. Eastern Energy Gas' net periodic benefit credit related to this plan was $5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Net periodic benefit credit is reflected in other operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Employee headcount is the basis for determining the share of total other postretirement benefit costs for participating DEI subsidiaries.

Pension benefits for Eastern Energy Gas employees represented by collective bargaining units were covered by a separate pension plan that provides benefits to employees of both EGTS and Hope Gas, Inc. ("Hope"). Employee compensation was the basis for allocating pension costs and obligations between EGTS and Hope. Retiree healthcare and life insurance benefits for Eastern Energy Gas employees represented by collective bargaining units were covered by a separate other postretirement benefit plan that provides benefits to both EGTS and Hope. Employee headcount was the basis for allocating other postretirement benefit costs and obligations between EGTS and Hope.

Pension Remeasurement

In the third quarter of 2020, Eastern Energy Gas remeasured a pension plan due to a curtailment resulting from the agreement for DEI to retain the assets and obligations of the pension benefit plan associated with the GT&S Transaction. The remeasurement resulted in an increase in the pension benefit obligation of $3 million and a decrease in the fair value of the pension plan assets of $7 million for Eastern Energy Gas. The impact of the remeasurement on net periodic pension benefit credit was recognized prospectively from the remeasurement date and was not material. The discount rate used for the remeasurement was 3.16%. All other assumptions used for the remeasurement were consistent with the measurement as of December 31, 2019.

422


Net Periodic Benefit Credit

Net periodic benefit credit for the plans included the following components for the year ended December 31, 2020 (in millions):

PensionOther Postretirement
Service cost$$
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets(47)(16)
Net amortization(3)
Net periodic benefit credit$(29)$(14)

Significant assumptions used to determine periodic credits for the year ended December 31, 2020:

PensionOther Postretirement
Discount rate3.16% - 3.63%3.44 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets8.60 %8.50 %
Weighted average rate of increase for compensation4.73 %N/A
Healthcare cost trend rate6.50 %
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)5.00 %
Year that the rate reached the ultimate trend rate2026

Defined Contribution Plans

Eastern Energy Gas participated in the DEI defined contribution employee savings plans prior to the GT&S Transaction. Eastern Energy Gas' matching contributions were based on each participant's level of contribution. Contributions could not exceed the maximum allowable for tax purposes. Eastern Energy Gas' contributions to the 401(k) plan were $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

(11)    Asset Retirement Obligations

Eastern Energy Gas estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.

Eastern Energy Gas does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the associated liabilities on the Cove Point LNG facility, interim removal of natural gas pipelines and certain storage wells in EGTS' underground natural gas storage network cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Cost of removal regulatory liabilities totaled $82 million and $73 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Eastern Energy Gas will continue to monitor operational and strategic developments to identify if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate a retirement date for these assets.

423


The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of Eastern Energy Gas' ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
20222021
Beginning balance$55 $71 
Additions— 
Retirements(12)(17)
Accretion
Ending balance$48 $55 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$25 $33 
Other long-term liabilities23 22 
Total ARO liability$48 $55 

(12)    Risk Management and Hedging Activities

Eastern Energy Gas is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates, and foreign currency exchange rates. Eastern Energy Gas is principally exposed to natural gas market fluctuations primarily through fuel retained and used during the operation of the pipeline system as well as lost and unaccounted for gas, to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances, and to foreign currency exchange risk associated with Euro denominated debt. Eastern Energy Gas has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage and report on each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, Eastern Energy Gas uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. Eastern Energy Gas also uses interest rate swaps to hedge its exposure to variable interest rates on long-term debt as well as foreign currency swaps to hedge its exposure to principal and interest payments denominated in Euros. Eastern Energy Gas does not hedge all of its commodity price and interest rate risks, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices.

There have been no significant changes in Eastern Energy Gas' accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 13 for additional information on derivative contracts.

Derivative Contract Volumes

The following table summarizes the net notional amounts of outstanding commodity and foreign currency derivative contracts with fixed price terms that comprise the mark-to-market values as of December 31 (in millions):

Unit of
Measure20222021
Foreign currencyEuro €250 250 
Natural gasDth

Credit Risk

Eastern Energy Gas is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent Eastern Energy Gas' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, Eastern Energy Gas analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, Eastern Energy Gas enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, Eastern Energy Gas exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.
424



Upon the Cove Point LNG export/liquefaction facility commencing commercial operations, the majority of Cove Point's revenue and earnings are from annual reservation payments under certain terminalling, storage and transmission contracts with ST Cove Point, LLC, a joint venture of Sumitomo Corporation and Tokyo Gas Co., LTD., and GAIL Global (USA) LNG, LLC (the "Export Customers"). If such agreements were terminated and Cove Point was unable to replace such agreements on comparable terms, there could be a material impact on results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows.

The Export Customers comprised approximately 38% and 40% of Eastern Energy Gas' operating revenues for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, with Eastern Energy Gas' largest customer representing approximately 20% of such amounts.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, EGTS provided service to 266 customers with approximately 95% of its storage and transmission revenue being provided through firm services. The 10 largest customers provided approximately 38% of the total storage and transmission revenue and the thirty largest provided approximately 71% of the total storage and transmission revenue.

(13)    Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of Eastern Energy Gas' cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. Eastern Energy Gas has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Financial Statements using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that Eastern Energy Gas has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect Eastern Energy Gas' judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. Eastern Energy Gas develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

425


The following table presents Eastern Energy Gas' financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):

Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022
Assets:
Commodity derivative$— $$— $
Money market mutual funds42 — — 42 
Equity securities:
Investment funds14 — — 14 
$56 $$— $57 
Liabilities:
Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives$— $(20)$— $(20)
$— $(20)$— $(20)
As of December 31, 2021
Assets:
Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives$— $$— $
Equity securities:
Investment funds13 — — 13 
$13 $$— $16 
Liabilities:
Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives$— $(3)$— $(3)
$— $(3)$— $(3)

Eastern Energy Gas' investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchase or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which Eastern Energy Gas transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, Eastern Energy Gas uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent Eastern Energy Gas' estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. Eastern Energy Gas bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations, when available, or internally developed and commercial models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations are obtained from independent brokers, exchanges, direct communication with market participants and actual transactions executed by Eastern Energy Gas. Market price quotations are generally readily obtainable for the applicable term of Eastern Energy Gas' outstanding derivative contracts; therefore, Eastern Energy Gas' forward price curves reflect observable market quotes. Market price quotations for certain natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to the length of the contracts. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, as well as for those contracts that are not actively traded, Eastern Energy Gas uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contracts is a function of underlying forward commodity prices, interest rates, currency rates, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of contracts.

426


Eastern Energy Gas' long-term debt is carried at cost, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs as applicable, on the Consolidated Financial Statements. The fair value of Eastern Energy Gas' long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The carrying value of Eastern Energy Gas' variable-rate long-term debt approximates fair value because of the frequent repricing of these instruments at market rates. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of Eastern Energy Gas' long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$3,892 $3,510 $3,906 $4,266 

(14)    Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental Laws and Regulations

Eastern Energy Gas is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. Eastern Energy Gas believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Carbon Regulations

In August 2016, the EPA issued a draft rule proposing to reaffirm that a source's obligation to obtain a prevention of significant deterioration or Title V permit for greenhouse gases ("GHG") is triggered only if such permitting requirements are first triggered by non-GHG, or conventional, pollutants that are regulated by the New Source Review program, and to set a significant emissions rate at 75,000 tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions under which a source would not be required to apply best available control technology for its GHG emissions. Until the EPA ultimately takes final action on this rulemaking, Eastern Energy Gas cannot predict the impact to its results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows.

Legal Matters

Eastern Energy Gas is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. Eastern Energy Gas does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.

Surety Bonds

As of December 31, 2022, Eastern Energy Gas had purchased $19 million of surety bonds. Under the terms of the surety bonds, Eastern Energy Gas is obligated to indemnify the respective surety bond company for any amounts paid.

427


(15)    Revenue from Contracts with Customers

The following table summarizes Eastern Energy Gas' Customer Revenue by regulated and nonregulated, with further disaggregation of regulated by line of business, for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Gas transmission and storage$1,179 $1,044 $1,242 
Wholesale57 43 
Other(2)
Total regulated1,188 1,099 1,289 
Nonregulated821 767 798 
Total Customer Revenue2,009 1,866 2,087 
Other revenue(1)
(3)
Total operating revenue$2,006 $1,870 $2,090 

(1)Other revenue consists primarily of revenue recognized in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 815, "Derivative and Hedging" and includes unrealized gains and losses for derivatives not designated as hedges related to natural gas sales contracts.

Remaining Performance Obligations

The following table summarizes Eastern Energy Gas' revenue it expects to recognize in future periods related to significant unsatisfied remaining performance obligations for fixed contracts with expected durations in excess of one year as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):

Performance obligations expected to be satisfied
Less than 12 monthsMore than 12 monthsTotal
Eastern Energy Gas$1,694 $15,598 $17,292 

(16)    Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

The following table shows the change in accumulated other comprehensive loss by each component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of applicable income taxes, for the year ended December 31 (in millions):

UnrecognizedUnrealizedAccumulated
Amounts OnLosses OnOther
RetirementCash FlowNoncontrollingComprehensive
BenefitsHedgesInterestsLoss, Net
Balance, December 31, 2019$(106)$(81)$— $(187)
Other comprehensive income94 30 10 134 
Balance, December 31, 2020(12)(51)10 (53)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(5)10 
Balance, December 31, 2021(6)(42)(43)
Other comprehensive income (loss)(1)(3)
Balance, December 31, 2022$(1)$(43)$$(42)

428


The following table shows the reclassifications from AOCI to net income for the year ended December 31 (in millions):

(1)Consists principally AmountsAffected Line Item In The
ReclassifiedConsolidated Statements
From AOCIof Operations
2022
Deferred (gains) and losses on derivatives-hedging activities:
Interest rate contracts$Interest expense
Foreign currency contractsOther, net
Total
Tax(1)Income tax expense (benefit)
Total, net of tax$
2021
Deferred (gains) and losses on derivatives-hedging activities:
Interest rate contracts$Interest expense
Foreign currency contracts21 Other, net
Total27 
Tax(7)Income tax expense (benefit)
Total, net of tax$20 
2020
Deferred (gains) and losses on derivatives-hedging activities:
Interest rate contracts$157 Interest expense
Foreign currency contracts(25)Other, net
Total132 
Tax(34)Income tax expense (benefit)
Total, net of tax$98 
Unrecognized pension costs:
Actuarial losses$Other, net
Total
Tax(2)Income tax expense (benefit)
Total, net of tax$

The following table presents selected information related to losses on cash flow hedges included in AOCI in Eastern Energy Gas' Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):

AOCI After-TaxAmounts Expected to be Reclassified to Earnings During the Next 12 Months After-TaxMaximum Term
Interest rate$(37)$(3)264 months
Foreign currency(6)(4)42 months
Total$(43)$(7)

The amounts that will be reclassified from AOCI to earnings will generally be offset by the recognition of the hedged transactions (e.g., interest payments) in earnings, thereby achieving the realization of prices contemplated by the underlying risk management strategies and will vary from the expected amounts presented above as a result of changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates.
429



In July 2020, Eastern Energy Gas recorded a loss of $141 million ($105 million after-tax) in interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, for cash flow hedges of debt-related items that are probable of not occurring as a result of the GT&S Transaction. The derivatives related to these hedges were settled in October 2020 for a cash payment of $165 million.

(17)    Variable Interest Entities and Noncontrolling Interests

The primary beneficiary of a VIE is required to consolidate the VIE and to disclose certain information about its significant variable interests in the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both 1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and 2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

In November 2019, DEI contributed to Eastern Energy Gas a 75% controlling limited partner interest in Cove Point. In December 2019, DEI sold its retained 25% noncontrolling limited partner interest in Cove Point. As discussed in Note 3, as part of the GT&S Transaction, Eastern Energy Gas finalized a restructuring which included the disposition of a 50% noncontrolling interest in Cove Point to DEI, which resulted in Eastern Energy Gas owning 100% of the general partner interest and 25% of the limited partnership interest in Cove Point. Eastern Energy Gas concluded that Cove Point is a VIE due to the limited partners lacking the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. Eastern Energy Gas is the primary beneficiary of Cove Point as it has the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact its economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses and benefits which could be significant to it.

Eastern Energy Gas purchased shared services from Carolina Gas Services, Inc. ("Carolina Gas Services") an affiliated VIE, of $12 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Eastern Energy Gas' Consolidated Balance Sheets included amounts due to Carolina Gas Services of $1 million and $7 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Eastern Energy Gas determined that neither it nor any of its consolidated entities is the primary beneficiary of Carolina Gas Services as neither it nor any of its consolidated entities has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact its economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses and benefits which could be significant to them. Carolina Gas Services provides marketing and operational services. Neither Eastern Energy Gas nor any of its consolidated entities has any obligation to absorb more than its allocated share of Carolina Gas Services costs.

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, Eastern Energy Gas purchased shared services from Dominion Energy Questar Pipeline Services, Inc. ("DEQPS"), an affiliated VIE, of $23 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Eastern Energy Gas determined that neither it nor any of its consolidated entities was the primary beneficiary of DEQPS, as neither it nor any of its consolidated entities has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses and benefits which could be significant to them. DEQPS provided marketing and operational services. Neither Eastern Energy Gas nor any of its consolidated entities had any obligation to absorb more than its allocated share of DEQPS costs.

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, Eastern Energy Gas purchased shared services from Dominion Energy Services, Inc. ("DES"), an affiliated VIE, of $90 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. Eastern Energy Gas determined that neither it nor any of its consolidated entities was the primary beneficiary of DES as neither it nor any of its consolidated entities had both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses and benefits which could be significant to them. DES provided accounting, legal, finance and certain administrative and technical services. Neither Eastern Energy Gas nor any of its consolidated entities had any obligation to absorb more than its allocated share of DES costs.

Included in noncontrolling interests in the Consolidated Financial Statements are DEI's 50% interest in Cove Point (effective November 2020) and Brookfield Super-Core Infrastructure Partner's 25% interest in Cove Point.

430


(18)    Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):

202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$143 $144 $317 
Income taxes paid (received), net$$(60)$31 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$29 $42 $30 
Equity distributions(1)
$(42)$(137)$— 
Equity contributions(1)
$98 $73 $— 
Distribution of Questar Pipeline Group$— $— $(699)
Distribution of 50% interest in Cove Point$— $— $(2,765)
Acquisition of Eastern Energy Gas by BHE$— $— $343 
(1)Amounts primarily represent the forgiveness of affiliated receivables/payables.

(19)    Related Party Transactions

Transactions Prior to the GT&S Transaction

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, Eastern Energy Gas engaged in related party transactions primarily with other DEI subsidiaries (affiliates). Eastern Energy Gas' receivable and payable balances with affiliates were settled based on contractual terms or on a monthly basis, depending on the nature of the underlying transactions. Through October 31, 2020, Eastern Energy Gas was included in DEI's consolidated federal income tax return and, where applicable, combined state income tax returns. All affiliate payables or receivables were settled with DEI prior to the closing date of the GT&S Transaction.

Eastern Energy Gas transacted with affiliates for certain quantities of natural gas and other commodities at market prices in the ordinary course of business. Additionally, Eastern Energy Gas provided transmission and storage services to affiliates. Eastern Energy Gas also entered into certain other contracts with affiliates, and related parties, including construction services, which were presented separately from contracts involving commodities or services. Eastern Energy Gas participated in certain DEI benefit plans as described in Note 10.

DES, Carolina Gas Services, DEQPS and other affiliates provided accounting, legal, finance and certain administrative and technical services to Eastern Energy Gas. Eastern Energy Gas provided certain services to related parties, including technical services.

The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2020 include costs for certain general, administrative and corporate expenses assigned by DES, Carolina Gas Services and DEQPS to Eastern Energy Gas on the basis of direct and allocated methods in accordance with Eastern Energy Gas' services agreements with DES, Carolina Gas Services and DEQPS. Where costs incurred cannot be determined by specific identification, the costs were allocated based on the proportional level of effort devoted by DES, Carolina Gas Services and DEQPS resources that is attributable to the entity, determined by reference to number of employees, salaries and wages and other similar measures for the relevant DES service. Management believes the assumptions and methodologies underlying the allocation of general corporate overhead expenses are reasonable.

Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction, and with the exception of Cove Point, Eastern Energy Gas' transactions with other DEI subsidiaries are no longer related party transactions.

431


Presented below are Eastern Energy Gas' significant transactions with DES, Carolina Gas Services, DEQPS and other affiliated and related parties for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
2020
Sales of natural gas and transmission and storage services$207 
Purchases of natural gas and transmission and storage services10 
Services provided by related parties(1)
129 
Services provided to related parties(2)
83 
(1)Includes capitalized expenditures of $14 million.
(2)Includes amounts attributable to Atlantic Coast Pipeline, a related party VIE prior to the GT&S Transaction. See below for more information.


EGTS provided services to Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which totaled $46 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, included in operating revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Interest income related to the affiliated notes receivable under the DEI money pool was $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Eastern Energy Gas' affiliated notes receivable from DEI totaled $1.8 billion as of December 31, 2019. In August 2020, DEI repaid the remaining principal balance outstanding. Interest income on the promissory notes was $32 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

As of December 31, 2019, Eastern Energy Gas' affiliated notes receivable from the East Ohio Gas Company totaled $1.7 billion. In June 2020, the East Ohio Gas Company repaid the remaining principal balance outstanding. Interest income on these promissory notes was $33 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Interest charges related to Eastern Energy Gas' total borrowings under an intercompany revolving credit agreement with DEI were $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Interest charges related to CPMLP Holdings Company LLC's total borrowings from DES were $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

For the year ended December 31, 2020, Eastern Energy Gas distributed $4.3 billion to DEI.

Transactions Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction

Eastern Energy Gas is party to a tax-sharing agreement and is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. For current federal and state income taxes, Eastern Energy Gas had a receivable from BHE of $16 million and $8 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Eastern Energy Gas received net cash receipts for federal and state income taxes from BHE totaling $47 million and $76 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

Other assets included amounts due from an affiliate of $3 million as of December 31, 2021.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Eastern Energy Gas had $1 million and $5 million, respectively, of natural gas imbalances payable to affiliates, presented in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

432


Presented below are Eastern Energy Gas' significant transactions with affiliated and related parties for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
202220212020
Sales of natural gas and transmission and storage services$27 $32 $
Purchases of natural gas and transmission and storage services— 
Services provided by related parties(1)
83 51 
Services provided to related parties38 32 
(1)Includes capitalized expenditures.

Eastern Energy Gas participates in certain MidAmerican Energy benefit plans as described in Note 10. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, Eastern Energy Gas' amount due to MidAmerican Energy associated with these plans and reflected in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $51 million and $95 million, respectively.

Borrowings with BHE GT&S

Eastern Energy Gas has a $400 million intercompany revolving credit agreement from its parent, BHE GT&S, expiring in November 2023. The credit facility, which is for general corporate purposes and provides for the issuance of letters of credit, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") plus a fixed spread. There were no amounts outstanding under the credit agreement as of both December 31, 2022 and 2021.

BHE GT&S has an intercompany revolving credit agreement from Eastern Energy Gas expiring in November 2023. In March 2021, BHE GT&S increased its credit facility limit from $200 million to $400 million and to $650 million in November 2022. The credit agreement has a variable interest rate based on SOFR plus a fixed spread. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, $536 million and $7 million, respectively, was outstanding under the credit agreement. Interest income related to this borrowing totaled $7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022.
433


Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Section
434


Item 7.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is management's discussion and analysis of certain significant factors that have affected the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of EGTS during the periods included herein. This discussion should be read in conjunction with EGTS' historical Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. EGTS' actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.

Results of Operations

Overview

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2022 was $261 million, an increase of $105 million, or 67%, compared to 2021, primarily due to higher margin from regulated gas transmission and storage operations of $128 million and a decrease due to the settlement of depreciation rates in EGTS' general rate case, partially offset by an increase in income tax expense primarily due to higher pre-tax income.

Net income for the year ended December 31, 2021 was $156 million compared to a net loss of $181 million for 2020, primarily due to a 2020 charge associated with the abandonment of a significant portion of a project in connection with the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project ("Supply Header Project") and a 2020 charge for disallowance of capitalized AFUDC due to the resolution of EGTS' 2015 FERC audit, partially offset by a decrease of $50 million due to non-service cost credits recognized in 2020 related to certain Eastern Energy Gas over-funded benefit plans that were retained DEI as a result of the GT&S Transaction and an increase in income tax expense primarily due to higher pre-tax income.

Year Ended December 31, 2022 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2021

Operating revenue increased $82 million, or 9%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to an increase in regulated gas transmission and storage services revenues due to the settlement of EGTS' general rate case of $101 million and an increase in variable revenue related to park and loan activity of $24 million, partially offset by a decrease in regulated gas sales for operational and system balancing purposes primarily due to decreased volumes of $49 million.

(Excess) cost of gas was a credit of $33 million for 2022 compared to an expense of $13 million for 2021. The change is primarily due to a decrease in volumes sold of $62 million, partially offset by unfavorable change to operational and system balancing volumes of $20 million.

Operations and maintenance decreased $12 million, or 3%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to a decrease in post-retirement benefit related costs.

Depreciation and amortization decreased $14 million, or 8%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to the settlement of depreciation rates in EGTS' general rate case of $23 million, partially offset by higher plant placed in-service of $9 million.

Property and other taxes decreased $8 million, or 13%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower than estimated 2021 tax assessments.

Disallowance and abandonment of utility plant was a credit of $11 million for 2021. The change is due to a 2021 benefit from the finalization of entries for the disallowance of capitalized AFUDC.

Interest expense decreased $9 million, or 12%, for 2022 compared to 2021, primarily due to lower expense of $44 million related to the elimination of long-term indebtedness to Eastern Energy Gas following the Debt Exchange Transaction in June 2021. These decreases were partially offset by $32 million of interest expense incurred under the senior notes issued in connection with that transaction, which bear lower interest rates than the original long-term indebtedness to Eastern Energy Gas.

Other, net was an expense of $2 million for 2022 compared to a credit of $2 million in 2021. The change is primarily due to losses on marketable securities.

Income tax expense (benefit) increased $48 million, or 79%, for2022 compared to 2021 and the effective tax rate was 29% in 2022 and 28% in 2021. The effective tax rate increased primarily due to the revaluation of deferred taxes from changes in various state income tax rates.

435


Year Ended December 31, 2021 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2020

Operating revenue decreased $25 million, or 3%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to $43 million of lower fees earned for services performed for Atlantic Coast Pipeline, partially offset by an increase in regulated natural gas sales of $15 million for operational and system balancing purposes primarily due to higher natural gas prices.

Cost of gas decreased $8 million, or 38%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to favorable valuations of system gas of $55 million, partially offset by an increase in prices of natural gas sold of $49 million.

Operations and maintenance decreased $16 million, or 4%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower expenses incurred in connection with services performed for Atlantic Coast Pipeline in connection with the cancelled Atlantic Coast Pipeline project of $45 million, partially offset by a $27 million increase in salaries, wages and benefits and general administrative expenses.
Depreciation and amortization increased $3 million, or 2%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher plant placed in-service during 2021.

Property and other taxes increased $9 million, or 17%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to higher property tax assessments.

Disallowance and abandonment of utility plant was a credit of $11 million for 2021 compared to an expense of $525 million for 2020. The change is primarily due to a 2020 charge associated with the abandonment of the Supply Header Project of $463 million, a 2020 charge for disallowance of capitalized AFUDC due to the resolution of EGTS' 2015 FERC audit of $43 million, the 2020 write-off of certain items in connection with the GT&S Transaction of $18 million and a 2021 benefit from the finalization of entries for the disallowance of capitalized AFUDC of $11 million.

Interest expense decreased $11 million, or 12%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower expense of $44 million related to the elimination of long-term indebtedness to Eastern Energy Gas following the Debt Exchange Transaction in June 2021. These decreases were partially offset by $32 million of interest expense incurred under the senior notes issued in connection with that transaction, which bear lower interest rates than the original long-term indebtedness to Eastern Energy Gas.

Allowance for equity funds decreased $6 million, or 50%, for 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to lower capital expenditures related to the Supply Header Project as a result of the abandonment of the project.

Other, net decreased $60 million, or 97%, for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to 2020, primarily due to non-service cost credits recognized in 2020 related to the overfunded status of certain DEI benefit plans in which EGTS' employees participated prior to the GT&S Transaction.

Income tax expense (benefit) was an expense of $61 million for 2021 compared to a benefit of $67 million for 2020. The effective tax rate was 28% in 2021 and 27% in 2020.

436


Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2022, EGTS' total net liquidity was as follows (in millions):
Cash and cash equivalents not$16 
Intercompany revolving credit agreement(1)
400 
Less:
Notes payable to affiliates36 
Net intercompany revolving credit agreement364 
Total net liquidity$380 
Intercompany credit agreement:
Maturity date2023

(1)Refer to Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding EGTS' intercompany revolving credit agreement.
Operating Activities

Net cash flows from operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $552 million and $367 million, respectively. The change was primarily due to the impacts from the proposed rate increase in effect April 1, 2022 for the EGTS general rate case, timing of income tax payments, higher collections of receivables from affiliates and other working capital adjustments.

Net cash flows from operating activities for each of the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $367 million. Higher collections of non-trade receivables and lower payments on outstanding accounts payable balances were offset by lower collections from affiliates and other changes in working capital amounts.

The timing of EGTS' income tax cash flows from period to period can be significantly affected by the estimated federal income tax payment methods selected and assumptions made for each payment date.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 were $(286) million and $(357) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to a decrease in capital expenditures of $83 million and lower loans to affiliates of $6 million, partially offset by lower repayments of loans by affiliates of $8 million.

Net cash flows from investing activities for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 were $(357) million and $(265) million, respectively. The change was primarily due to increases in capital expenditures of $95 million related to increased pipeline integrity work.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2022 were $(247) million and consisted of dividends paid to Eastern Energy Gas of $215 million and net repayment of notes payable to Eastern Energy Gas of $32 million.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were $(7) million, primarily reflecting dividends paid of $18 million and the net repayment of notes payable to Eastern Energy Gas of $13 million, partially offset by a $20 million equity contribution from Eastern Energy Gas.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were $(91) million, reflecting dividends paid of $125 million, partially offset by the issuance of notes payable from Eastern Energy Gas of $34 million.

437


Short-term Debt

As of December 31, 2022, EGTS had $36 million of an outstanding note payable to an affiliate at a weighted average interest rate of 1.43%. As of December 31, 2021, EGTS had $68 million of an outstanding note payable to an affiliate at a weighted average interest rate of 0.51%. For further discussion, refer to Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Future Uses of Cash

Capital Expenditures

Capital expenditure needs are reviewed regularly by management and may change significantly as a result of these reviews, which may consider, among other factors, new growth projects and the timing of growth projects; changes in environmental and other rules and regulations; impacts to customers' rates; outcomes of regulatory proceedings; changes in income tax laws; general business conditions; system reliability standards; the cost and efficiency of construction labor, equipment and materials; commodity prices; and the cost and availability of capital.

EGTS' historical and forecasted capital expenditures, each of which exclude amounts for non-cash equity AFUDC and other non-cash items, for the years ending December 31 are as follows (in millions):
HistoricalForecast
202020212022202320242025
Natural gas transmission and storage$110 $10 $35 $$40 $107 
Other153 348 240 191 173 173 
Total$263 $358 $275 $200 $213 $280 

EGTS' natural gas transmission and storage capital expenditures primarily include growth capital expenditures related to planned regulated projects. EGTS' other capital expenditures consist primarily of pipeline integrity work, automation and controls upgrades, underground storage, corrosion control, unit exchanges, compressor modifications and projects related to Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration natural gas storage rules. The amounts also include EGTS' asset modernization program, which includes projects for vintage pipeline replacement, compression replacement, pipeline assessment and underground storage integrity.

Material Cash Requirements

The following table summarizes EGTS' material cash requirements as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):

Payments Due by Periods
20232024-20252026-20272028 and thereafterTotal
Interest payments on long-term debt(1)
$64 $125 $121 $873 $1,183 
Natural gas supply and transmission(1)
49 98 98 — 245 
Total cash requirements$113 $223 $219 $873 $1,428 
(1)Not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In addition, EGTS also has cash requirements that may affect its consolidated financial condition that arise from operating leases (refer to Note 6), long-term debt (refer to Note 9), construction and other development costs (refer to Liquidity and Capital Resources included within this Item 7), uncertain tax positions (refer to Note 10) and AROs (refer to Note 12). Refer, where applicable, to the respective referenced note in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10‑K for additional information.

438


Regulatory Matters

EGTS is subject to comprehensive regulation. Refer to the discussion contained in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further information regarding EGTS' general regulatory framework and current regulatory matters.

Environmental Laws and Regulations

EGTS is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. In addition to imposing continuing compliance obligations and capital expenditure requirements, these laws and regulations provide regulators with the authority to levy substantial penalties for noncompliance, including fines, injunctive relief and other sanctions. These laws and regulations are administered by various federal, state and local agencies. EGTS believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations, although many laws and regulations are subject to interpretation that may ultimately be resolved by the courts. Environmental laws and regulations continue to evolve, and EGTS is unable to predict the impact of the changing laws and regulations on its operations and financial results.

Refer to "Environmental Laws and Regulations" in Item 1 of this Form 10-K for further discussion regarding environmental laws and regulations.

Collateral and Contingent Features

Debt of EGTS is rated by credit rating agencies. Assigned credit ratings are based on each rating agency's assessment of EGTS' ability to, in general, meet the obligations of its issued debt. The credit ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and there is no assurance that a particular credit rating will continue for any given period of time.

EGTS has no credit rating downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity dates of outstanding debt, and a change in ratings is not an event of default under the applicable debt instruments.

Inflation

Historically, overall inflation and changing prices in the economies where EGTS operates have not had a significant impact on EGTS' consolidated financial results. EGTS operates under cost-of-service based rate-setting structures administered by the FERC. Under these rate-setting structures, EGTS is allowed to include prudent costs in its rates, including the impact of inflation. EGTS attempts to minimize the potential impact of inflation on its operations by employing prudent risk management and hedging strategies and by considering, among other areas, its impact on purchases of energy, operating expenses, materials and equipment costs, contract negotiations, future capital spending programs and long-term debt issuances. There can be no assurance that such actions will be successful.

Critical Accounting Estimates

Certain accounting measurements require management to make estimates and judgments concerning transactions that will be settled several years in the future. Amounts recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements based on such estimates involve numerous assumptions subject to varying and potentially significant degrees of judgment and uncertainty and will likely change in the future as additional information becomes available. The following critical accounting estimates are impacted significantly by EGTS' methods, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and should be read in conjunction with EGTS' Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in EGTS' Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

EGTS prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, EGTS defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.
439


EGTS continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit EGTS' ability to recover its costs. EGTS believes its application of the guidance for regulated operations is appropriate and its existing regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate at the federal level. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as AOCI. Total regulatory assets were $39 million and total regulatory liabilities were $627 million as of December 31, 2022. Refer to EGTS' Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding EGTS' regulatory assets and liabilities.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

EGTS evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment supports EGTS' regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets.

The estimate of cash flows arising from the future use of an asset, for the purposes of impairment analysis, requires the exercise of judgment. Circumstances that could significantly alter the calculation of fair value or the recoverable amount of an asset may include significant changes in the regulatory environment, the business climate, management's plans, legal factors, market price of the asset, the use of the asset, the physical condition of the asset, future market prices, competition and many other factors over the life of the asset. Any resulting impairment loss is highly dependent on the underlying assumptions and could significantly affect EGTS' results of operations.

Income Taxes

In determining EGTS' income taxes, management is required to interpret complex income tax laws and regulations, which includes consideration of regulatory implications imposed by the FERC. EGTS' income tax returns are subject to continuous examinations by federal, state and local income tax authorities that may give rise to different interpretations of these complex laws and regulations. Due to the nature of the examination process, it generally takes years before these examinations are completed and these matters are resolved. EGTS recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Although the ultimate resolution of EGTS' federal, state and local income tax examinations is uncertain, EGTS believes it has made adequate provisions for these income tax positions. The aggregate amount of any additional income tax liabilities that may result from these examinations is not expected to have a material impact on EGTS' consolidated financial results. Refer to EGTS' Note 10 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding EGTS' income taxes.

It is probable that EGTS will pass income tax benefit and expense related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% as a result of 2017 Tax Reform, certain property-related basis differences and other various differences on to their customers. As of December 31, 2022, these amounts were recognized as a net regulatory liability of $382 million and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.

Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

EGTS' Consolidated Balance Sheets include assets and liabilities with fair values that are subject to market risks. EGTS' significant market risks are primarily associated with commodity prices, interest rates and the extension of credit to counterparties with which EGTS transacts. The following discussion addresses the significant market risks associated with EGTS' business activities. EGTS has established guidelines for credit risk management. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding EGTS' contracts accounted for as derivatives.

440


Commodity Price Risk

EGTS is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices. EGTS is principally exposed to natural gas market fluctuations primarily through fuel retained and used during the operation of the pipeline system as well as lost and unaccounted for gas. EGTS is exposed to the risk of fuel retention, meaning customers have a fixed fuel retention percentage assessed on transmission and storage quantities, and the pipeline bears the risk of under-recovery and benefits from any over-recovery of volumes. Commodity prices are subject to wide price swings as supply and demand are impacted by, among many other unpredictable items, weather, market liquidity, facility availability, customer usage, storage and transmission constraints. EGTS does not engage in proprietary trading activities. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, EGTS uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply quantities or sell future supply quantities generally at fixed prices. EGTS does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. As of February 2023, EGTS recovers its cost of gas through a fuel tracker and is no longer subject to significant commodity price risk.

Interest Rate Risk

EGTS is exposed to interest rate risk on its outstanding variable-rate short- and long-term debt and future debt issuances. EGTS manages its interest rate risk by limiting its exposure to variable interest rates primarily through the issuance of fixed-rate long-term debt and by monitoring market changes in interest rates. As a result of the fixed interest rates, EGTS' fixed-rate long-term debt does not expose EGTS to the risk of loss due to changes in market interest rates. Additionally, because fixed-rate long-term debt is not carried at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, changes in fair value would impact earnings and cash flows only if EGTS were to reacquire all or a portion of these instruments prior to their maturity. The nature and amount of EGTS' short- and long-term debt can be expected to vary from period to period as a result of future business requirements, market conditions and other factors. Refer to Note 9 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional discussion of EGTS' long-term debt.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, EGTS had short- and long-term variable-rate obligations totaling $36 million and $68 million, respectively, that expose EGTS to the risk of increased interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If variable interest rates were to increase by 10% from December 31 levels, it would not have a material effect on EGTS' annual interest expense. The carrying value of the variable-rate obligations approximates fair value as of December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Credit Risk

EGTS is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with natural gas transmission and storage service contracts with utilities, natural gas producers, power generators, industrials, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent EGTS' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct and indirect relationships among the counterparties. Before entering into a transaction, EGTS analyzes the financial condition of each wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate counterparty credit risk, EGTS obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit, financial guarantee bonds and cash deposits. If required, EGTS exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

EGTS' gross credit exposure for each counterparty is calculated as outstanding receivables plus any unrealized on- or off-balance sheet exposure, taking into account contractual netting rights. Gross credit exposure is calculated prior to the application of collateral. As of December 31, 2022, EGTS credit exposure totaled $90 million. Of this amount, investment grade counterparties, including those internally rated, represented 98%, with three investment grade counterparties representing 57%.
441


Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

442


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors of Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc., and subsidiaries ("EGTS") as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in shareholder's equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of EGTS as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of EGTS' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on EGTS' financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to EGTS in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. EGTS is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of EGTS' internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Regulatory Matters — Effects of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements — Refer to Notes 2 and 7 to the Financial Statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

EGTS prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Management has determined EGTS meets the requirements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America to prepare its financial statements applying the specialized rules to account for the effects of cost-based rate regulation. Accordingly, EGTS defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur. Furthermore, revenue provided by EGTS' interstate natural gas transmission operations is based primarily on rates approved by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC").

443


EGTS continually evaluates the applicability of the guidance for regulated operations and whether its regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of inclusion in future regulated rates by considering factors such as a change in the regulator's approach to setting rates from cost-based ratemaking to another form of regulation, other regulatory actions or the impact of competition that could limit EGTS' ability to recover its costs. The evaluation reflects the current political and regulatory climate. If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers, or re-established as accumulated comprehensive income (loss). Accounting for the economics of rate regulation has a pervasive effect on the financial statements.

We identified the effects of rate regulation as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about affected account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of future regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing the likelihood of (1) recovery in future rates of incurred costs and (2) a refund to customers. Given that management's accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the FERC, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of the accounting for rate regulation and the rate setting process due to its inherent complexities.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the assessment of whether recovery of regulatory assets through future rates or a regulatory liability due to customers is probable included the following, among others:
We evaluated EGTS' disclosures related to the effects of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the FERC, as well as relevant regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other external information. We evaluated the external information and compared to management's recorded regulatory assets and liability balances for completeness and to assess whether this external information was properly considered by management in concluding upon the financial statement impacts of rate regulation.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected EGTS' filings with the FERC, and the filings with the FERC by intervenors to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of refunds due to customers based on precedents of the FERC's treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Richmond, Virginia
February 24, 2023

We have served as EGTS' auditor since 2000.
444


EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$16 $11 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents29 15 
Trade receivables, net113 98 
Receivables from affiliates13 
Inventories50 48 
Income taxes receivable21 19 
Prepayments36 35 
Natural gas imbalances193 94 
Other current assets10 
Total current assets480 339 
Property, plant and equipment, net4,504 4,440 
Notes receivable from affiliates— 
Other assets190 319 
Total assets$5,174 $5,101 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
445


EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions, except share data)

As of December 31,
20222021
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable$46 $54 
Accounts payable to affiliates13 
Accrued property, income and other taxes71 71 
Accrued employee expenses13 12 
Notes payable to affiliates36 68 
Regulatory liabilities109 25 
Customer and security deposits29 15 
Asset retirement obligations25 33 
Other current liabilities39 37 
Total current liabilities373 328 
Long-term debt1,582 1,581 
Regulatory liabilities518 507 
Other long-term liabilities101 145 
Total liabilities2,574 2,561 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
Shareholder's equity:
Common stock - 75,000 shares authorized, $10,000 par value, 60,101 issued and outstanding609 609 
Additional paid-in capital1,275 1,241 
Retained earnings746 721 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(30)(31)
Total shareholder's equity2,600 2,540 
  
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$5,174 $5,101 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
446


EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating revenue$973 $891 $916 
Operating expenses:
(Excess) cost of gas(33)13 21 
Operations and maintenance364 376 392 
Depreciation and amortization152 166 163 
Property and other taxes54 62 53 
Disallowance and abandonment of utility plant— (11)525 
Total operating expenses537 606 1,154 
Operating income (loss)436 285 (238)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(69)(78)(89)
Allowance for borrowed funds
Allowance for equity funds12 
Other, net(2)62 
Total other income (expense)(66)(68)(10)
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit)370 217 (248)
Income tax expense (benefit)109 61 (67)
Net income (loss)$261 $156 $(181)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
447


EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income (loss)$261 $156 $(181)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $1, $(12) and $—(31)— 
Unrecognized amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $—, $— and $30— — 77 
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax(31)77 
Comprehensive income (loss)$262 $125 $(104)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
448


EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
(Amounts in millions, except shares)

Accumulated
AdditionalOtherTotal
Common StockPaid-inRetainedComprehensiveShareholder's
SharesAmountCapitalEarningsLoss, NetEquity
Balance, December 31, 201960,101 $609 $889 $947 $(77)$2,368 
Net loss— — — (181)— (181)
Other comprehensive income— — — — 77 77 
Dividends declared— — — (125)— (125)
Acquisition of EGTS by BHE— — 40 — — 40 
Balance, December 31, 202060,101 609 929 641 — 2,179 
Net income— — — 156 — 156 
Other comprehensive loss— — — — (31)(31)
Dividends declared— — (76)— (76)
Contributions— — 312 — — 312 
Balance, December 31, 202160,101 609 1,241 721 (31)2,540 
Net income— — — 261 — 261 
Other comprehensive income— — — — 
Dividends declared— — — (236)— (236)
Contributions— — 34 — — 34 
Balance, December 31, 202260,101 $609 $1,275 $746 $(30)$2,600 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
449


EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)$261 $156 $(181)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
Losses (gains) on other items, net(8)517 
Depreciation and amortization152 166 163 
Allowance for equity funds(4)(6)(12)
Changes in regulatory assets and liabilities61 — 24 
Deferred income taxes92 93 (121)
Other, net(7)26 
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables and other assets(48)48 49 
Receivables from affiliates(4)(46)
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans— (17)(85)
Accrued property, income and other taxes18 (23)10 
Accounts payable and other liabilities25 — 
Accounts payable to affiliates(8)11 (32)
Net cash flows from operating activities552 367 367 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures(275)(358)(263)
Loans to affiliates(8)(14)— 
Repayment of loans by affiliates11 19 — 
Other, net(14)(4)(2)
Net cash flows from investing activities(286)(357)(265)
Cash flows from financing activities:
(Repayment) issuance of notes payable, net(32)(13)34 
Proceeds from equity contributions— 20 — 
Dividends paid(215)(18)(125)
Other, net— — 
Net cash flows from financing activities(247)(7)(91)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents19 11 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period26 23 12 
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents at end of period$45 $26 $23 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
450


EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)Organization and Operations

Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("EGTS") conduct business activities consisting of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC")-regulated interstate natural gas transmission pipeline and underground storage. EGTS' operations include transmission pipelines in Maryland, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia. EGTS also operates one of the nation's largest underground natural gas storage systems located in New York, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. EGTS is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC ("Eastern Energy Gas"). On November 1, 2020, Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE") completed its acquisition of substantially all of the natural gas transmission and storage business of Dominion Energy, Inc. ("DEI") (the "GT&S Transaction"). As a result of the GT&S Transaction, EGTS became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of BHE. BHE is a holding company based in Des Moines, Iowa that owns subsidiaries principally engaged in the energy industry. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway"). See Note 3 for more information regarding the GT&S Transaction.

(2)    Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Consolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of EGTS and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial interest as of the financial statement date. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the effects of regulation; recovery of long-lived assets; certain assumptions made in accounting for pension and other postretirement benefits; asset retirement obligations ("AROs"); income taxes; unbilled revenue; valuation of certain financial assets and liabilities, including derivative contracts; and accounting for contingencies. Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types of Regulation

EGTS prepares its Consolidated Financial Statements in accordance with authoritative guidance for regulated operations, which recognizes the economic effects of regulation. Accordingly, EGTS defers the recognition of certain costs or income if it is probable that, through the ratemaking process, there will be a corresponding increase or decrease in future regulated rates. Regulatory assets and liabilities are established to reflect the impacts of these deferrals, which will be recognized in earnings in the periods the corresponding changes in regulated rates occur.

If it becomes no longer probable that the deferred costs or income will be included in future regulated rates, the related regulatory assets and liabilities will be recognized in net income, returned to customers or re-established as accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI").

Fair Value Measurements

As defined under GAAP, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability between market participants in the principal market or in the most advantageous market when no principal market exists. Adjustments to transaction prices or quoted market prices may be required in illiquid or disorderly markets in order to estimate fair value. Alternative valuation techniques may be appropriate under the circumstances to determine the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction. Market participants are assumed to be independent, knowledgeable, able and willing to transact an exchange and not under duress. Nonperformance or credit risk is considered when determining fair value. Considerable judgment may be required in interpreting market data used to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, estimates of fair value presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current or future market exchange.

451


Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash equivalents consist of funds invested in money market mutual funds, U.S. Treasury Bills and other investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased. Cash and cash equivalents exclude amounts where availability is restricted by legal requirements, loan agreements or other contractual provisions. Restricted cash and cash equivalents consist of customer deposits as allowed under the FERC gas tariff. A reconciliation of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows is outlined below and disaggregated by the line items in which they appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheets (in millions):

As of December 31,
20222021
Cash and cash equivalents$16 $11 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents29 15 
Total cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents$45 $26 

Allowance for Credit Losses

Trade receivables are primarily short-term in nature and are stated at the outstanding principal amount, net of an estimated allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses is based on EGTS' assessment of the collectability of amounts owed to EGTS by its customers. This assessment requires judgment regarding the ability of customers to pay or the outcome of any pending disputes. In measuring the allowance for credit losses for trade receivables, EGTS primarily evaluates the financial condition of the individual customer and the nature of any disputed amount.

The changes in the balance of the allowance for credit losses, which is included in trades receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is summarized as follows for the years ended December 31, (in millions):

202220212020
Beginning balance$$$
Charged to operating costs and expenses, net— 
Write-offs, net(3)— — 
Ending balance$— $$

Derivatives

EGTS employs a number of different derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to manage its commodity price and interest rate risks. Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchases or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. Derivative balances reflect offsetting permitted under master netting agreements with counterparties and cash collateral paid or received under such agreements. Cash collateral received from or paid to counterparties to secure derivative contract assets or liabilities in excess of amounts offset is included in other current assets or other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Commodity derivatives used in normal business operations that are settled by physical delivery, among other criteria, are eligible for and may be designated as normal purchases or normal sales. Normal purchases or normal sales contracts are not marked-to-market and settled amounts are recognized as operating revenue or cost of gas on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

For EGTS' derivatives not designated as hedging contracts, unrealized gains and losses are recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as operating revenue for derivatives related to natural gas sales contracts.

For EGTS' derivatives designated as hedging contracts, EGTS formally assesses, at inception and thereafter, whether the hedging contract is highly effective in offsetting changes in the hedged item. EGTS formally documents hedging activity by transaction type and risk management strategy. For derivative instruments that are accounted for as cash flow hedges or fair value hedges, the cash flows from the derivatives and from the related hedged items are classified in operating cash flows.

452


Changes in the estimated fair value of a derivative contract designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge, to the extent effective, are included on the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity as AOCI, net of tax, until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings. EGTS discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when it has determined that a derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, or when it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur. When hedge accounting is discontinued because the derivative contract no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, future changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative contract are charged to earnings. Gains and losses related to discontinued hedges that were previously recorded in AOCI will remain in AOCI until the contract settles and the hedged item is recognized in earnings, unless it becomes probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will not occur at which time associated deferred amounts in AOCI are immediately recognized in earnings.

Inventories

Inventories consist mainly of materials and supplies and are determined using the average cost method.

Natural Gas Imbalances

Natural gas imbalances occur when the physical amount of natural gas delivered from, or received by, a pipeline system or storage facility differs from the contractual amount of natural gas delivered or received. EGTS values these imbalances due to, or from, shippers and operators at an appropriate index price at period end, subject to the terms of its tariff for regulated entities. Imbalances are primarily settled in-kind. Imbalances due to EGTS from other parties are reported in natural gas imbalances and imbalances that EGTS owes to other parties are reported in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

General

Additions to property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. EGTS capitalizes all construction-related materials, direct labor and contract services, as well as indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include debt and equity allowance for funds used during construction ("AFUDC"), as applicable. The cost of additions and betterments are capitalized, while costs incurred that do not improve or extend the useful lives of the related assets are generally expensed.

Depreciation and amortization are generally computed by applying the composite or straight-line method based on estimated useful lives. Depreciation studies are completed by EGTS to determine the appropriate group lives, net salvage and group depreciation rates. These studies are reviewed and rates are ultimately approved by the FERC. See Note 7 for the prospective impacts related to changes in depreciation rates. Net salvage includes the estimated future residual values of the assets and any estimated removal costs recovered through approved depreciation rates. Estimated removal costs are recorded as either a cost of removal regulatory liability or an ARO liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, depending on whether the obligation meets the requirements of an ARO. As actual removal costs are incurred, the associated liability is reduced.

Generally when EGTS retires or sells a component of regulated property, plant and equipment, it charges the original cost, net of any proceeds from the disposition, to accumulated depreciation. Any gain or loss on disposals of all other assets is recorded through earnings.

Debt and equity AFUDC, which represent the estimated costs of debt and equity funds necessary to finance the construction of regulated facilities, is capitalized by EGTS as a component of property, plant and equipment, with offsetting credits to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is computed based on guidelines set forth by the FERC. After construction is completed, EGTS is permitted to earn a return on these costs as a component of the related assets, as well as recover these costs through depreciation expense over the useful lives of the related assets.

453


Asset Retirement Obligations

EGTS recognizes AROs when it has a legal obligation to perform decommissioning, reclamation or removal activities upon retirement of an asset. EGTS' AROs are primarily related to the obligations associated with its natural gas pipeline and storage well assets. The fair value of an ARO liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made, and is added to the carrying amount of the associated asset, which is then depreciated over the remaining useful life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial recognition, the ARO liability is adjusted for any revisions to the original estimate of undiscounted cash flows (with corresponding adjustments to property, plant and equipment, net) and for accretion of the ARO liability due to the passage of time. For EGTS, the difference between the ARO liability, the corresponding ARO asset included in property, plant and equipment, net and amounts recovered in rates to satisfy such liabilities is recorded as a regulatory asset or liability.

Impairment

EGTS evaluates long-lived assets for impairment, including property, plant and equipment, when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable or when the assets are being held for sale. Upon the occurrence of a triggering event, the asset is reviewed to assess whether the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected from the use of the asset plus the residual value from the ultimate disposal exceeds the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated recoverable amounts, the asset is written down to the estimated fair value and any resulting impairment loss is reflected on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As substantially all property, plant and equipment supports EGTS' regulated businesses, the impacts of regulation are considered when evaluating the carrying value of regulated assets. See Note 7 for more information.

Leases

EGTS has non-cancelable operating leases primarily for office space, office equipment and land and finance leases consisting primarily of natural gas pipeline facilities and vehicles. These leases generally require EGTS to pay for insurance, taxes and maintenance applicable to the leased property. Given the capital intensive nature of the utility industry, it is common for a portion of lease costs to be capitalized when used during construction or maintenance of assets, in which the associated costs will be capitalized with the corresponding asset and depreciated over the remaining life of that asset. Certain leases contain renewal options for varying periods and escalation clauses for adjusting rent to reflect changes in price indices. EGTS does not include options in its lease calculations unless there is a triggering event indicating EGTS is reasonably certain to exercise the option. EGTS' accounting policy is to not recognize right-of-use assets and lease obligations for leases with contract terms of one year or less and not separate lease components from non-lease components and instead account for each separate lease component and the non-lease components associated with a lease as a single lease component. Leases will be evaluated for impairment in line with Accounting Standards Codification 360, "Property, Plant and Equipment" when a triggering event has occurred that might affect the value and use of the assets being leased.

EGTS' operating and finance right-of-use assets are recorded in other assets and the operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded in current and long-term other liabilities accordingly.

Revenue Recognition

EGTS uses a single five-step model to identify and recognize revenue from contracts with customers ("Customer Revenue") upon transfer of control of promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which EGTS expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. EGTS records sales and excise taxes collected directly from customers and remitted directly to the taxing authorities on a net basis on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

A majority of EGTS' Customer Revenue is derived from tariff-based sales arrangements approved by the FERC. These tariff-based revenues are mainly comprised of natural gas transmission and storage services and have performance obligations which are satisfied over time as services are provided.

454


Revenue recognized is equal to what EGTS has the right to invoice as it corresponds directly with the value to the customer of EGTS' performance to date and includes billed and unbilled amounts. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, trade receivables, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets relate substantially to Customer Revenue, including unbilled revenue of $9 million and $28 million, respectively. Payments for amounts billed are generally due from the customer within 30 days of billing. Rates charged for energy products and services are established by regulators or contractual arrangements that establish the transaction price as well as the allocation of price amongst the separate performance obligations. When preliminary regulated rates are permitted to be billed prior to final approval by the applicable regulator, certain revenue collected may be subject to refund and a liability for estimated refunds is accrued. See Note 7 for discussion surrounding EGTS' provision for rate refund. In the event one of the parties to a contract has performed before the other, EGTS would recognize a contract asset or contract liability depending on the relationship between EGTS' performance and the customer's payment. EGTS has recognized contract assets of $10 million and $19 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, and $9 million and $3 million of contract liabilities as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, due to EGTS' performance on certain contracts.

Unamortized Debt Premiums, Discounts and Debt Issuance Costs

Premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs incurred for the issuance of long-term debt are amortized over the term of the related financing using the effective interest method.

Income Taxes

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, DEI included EGTS in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction, Berkshire Hathaway includes EGTS in its consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. Consistent with established regulatory practice, EGTS' provision for income taxes has been computed on a stand-alone basis.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are based on differences between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted income tax rates expected to be in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with components of OCI are charged or credited directly to OCI. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities associated with certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that EGTS' regulated businesses deems probable to be passed on to its customers are charged or credited directly to a regulatory asset or liability and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse. Other changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities are included as a component of income tax expense. Changes in deferred income tax assets and liabilities attributable to changes in enacted income tax rates are charged or credited to income tax expense or a regulatory asset or liability in the period of enactment. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred income tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized.

EGTS recognizes the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more-likely-than-not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements from such a position are measured based on the largest benefit that is more-likely-than-not to be realized upon ultimate settlement. Estimated interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions are included as a component of income tax expense (benefit) on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Segment Information

EGTS currently has one segment, which includes its natural gas pipeline and storage operations.

(3)    Business Acquisitions and Dispositions

Acquisition of EGTS by BHE

In July 2020, DEI entered into an agreement to sell substantially all of its natural gas transmission and storage operations, including EGTS, to BHE. In November 2020, the GT&S Transaction was completed and EGTS became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of BHE. DEI retained the assets and obligations of the pension and other postretirement employee benefit plans associated with the operations sold and relating to services provided before closing. The GT&S Transaction was treated as a deemed asset sale for federal and state income tax purposes and all deferred taxes at EGTS were reset to reflect financial and tax basis differences as of November 1, 2020. See Notes 10 and 11 for more information on the GT&S Transaction.

455


In accordance with the terms of the GT&S Transaction, DEI retained certain assets and liabilities associated with EGTS and settled all affiliated balances. As a result, EGTS recorded a contribution for the reset of deferred taxes of $1.0 billion and $34 million for retained tax liabilities payable to EGTS by DEI, net of distributions of $904 million related to the pension and other postretirement employee benefit plans retained by DEI and $107 million of other pension related amounts. In addition, EGTS decided to forgo recovery of $18 million of certain property, plant and equipment as a result of the GT&S Transaction, included in disallowance and abandonment of utility plant on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

(4)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Property, plant and equipment, net consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Depreciable Life20222021
Interstate natural gas pipeline and storage assets28 - 50 years$6,724 $6,517 
Intangible plant12 - 20 years79 74 
Plant in-service6,803 6,591 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(2,440)(2,339)
4,363 4,252 
Construction work-in-progress141 188 
Property, plant and equipment, net$4,504 $4,440 

(5)    Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Under joint facility ownership agreements with other utilities, EGTS, as a tenant in common, has undivided interests in jointly owned transmission and storage facilities. EGTS accounts for its proportionate share of each facility, and each joint owner has provided financing for its share of each facility. Operating costs of each facility are assigned to joint owners primarily based on their percentage of ownership. Operating costs and expenses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations include EGTS' share of the expenses of these facilities.

The amounts shown in the table below represent EGTS' share in each jointly owned facility included in property, plant and equipment, net as of December 31, 2022 (dollars in millions):

AccumulatedConstruction
EGTS'Facility inDepreciation andWork-in-
ShareServiceAmortizationProgress
Ellisburg Pool39 %$32 $11 $— 
Ellisburg Station50 26 
Harrison50 53 18 — 
Leidy50 143 47 
Oakford50 202 70 
Total$456 $154 $

456


(6)Leases

The following table summarizes EGTS' leases recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31 (in millions):

20222021
Right-of-use assets:
Operating leases$19 $20 
Total right-of-use assets$19 $20 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases$18 $18 
Total lease liabilities$18 $18 

The following table summarizes EGTS' lease costs for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Operating$$$
Short-term— — 
Total lease costs$$$
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases13.714.711.7
Finance leases0.00.04.6
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases4.3 %4.3 %4.4 %
Finance leases— %— %2.6 %

The following table summarizes EGTS' supplemental cash flow information relating to leases for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases$$$
Operating cash flows from finance leases— — 
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Finance leases$— $— $












457


EGTS has the following remaining operating lease commitments as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):

2023$
2024
2025
2026
2027
Thereafter14 
Total undiscounted lease payments24 
Less - amounts representing interest(6)
Lease liabilities$18 

(7)    Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets

Regulatory assets represent costs that are expected to be recovered in future regulated rates. EGTS' regulatory assets reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted Average Remaining Life20222021
Employee benefit plans(1)
11 years$31 $58 
OtherVarious
Total regulatory assets$39 $64 
Reflected as:
Current assets$$
Noncurrent assets34 62 
Total regulatory assets$39 $64 
(1)Represents costs expected to be recovered through future rates generally over the expected remaining service period of plan participants.


EGTS had regulatory assets not earning a return on investment of $39 million and $64 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

458


Regulatory Liabilities

Regulatory liabilities represent income to be recognized or amounts expected to be returned to customers in future periods. EGTS' regulatory liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
Weighted Average Remaining Life20222021
Income taxes refundable through future rates(1)
Various$382 $391 
Other postretirement benefit costs(2)
Various123 116 
Provision for rate refunds(3)
90 — 
Cost of removal(4)
53 years24 16 
OtherVarious
Total regulatory liabilities$627 $532 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$109 $25 
Noncurrent liabilities518 507 
Total regulatory liabilities$627 $532 

(1)Amounts primarily represent income tax liabilities related to the federal tax rate change from 35% to 21% that are probable to be passed on to customers, offset by income tax benefits related to certain property-related basis differences and other various differences that were previously passed on to customers and will be included in regulated rates when the temporary differences reverse.
(2)Reflects a regulatory liability for the collection of postretirement benefit costs allowed in rates in excess of expense incurred.
(3)Reflects amounts expected to be refunded to customers in late February 2023 in connection with the EGTS rate case. See below for more information.
(4)Amounts represent estimated costs, as accrued through depreciation rates and exclusive of ARO liabilities, of removing regulated property, plant and equipment in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Refer to Note 12 for more information.


Regulatory Matters

In September 2021, EGTS filed a general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services, with proposed rates to be effective November 1, 2021. EGTS' previous general rate case was settled in 1998. EGTS proposed an annual cost-of-service of approximately $1.1 billion, and requested increases in various rates, including general system storage rates by 85% and general system transmission rates by 60%. In October 2021, the FERC issued an order that accepted the November 1, 2021 effective date for certain changes in rates, while suspending the other changes for five months following the proposed effective date, until April 1, 2022, subject to refund. In September 2022, a settlement agreement was filed with the FERC, resolving EGTS' general rate case for its FERC-jurisdictional services and providing for increased service rates and decreased depreciation rates. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, EGTS' rates result in an increase to annual firm transmission and storage revenues of approximately $160 million and a decrease in annual depreciation expense of approximately $30 million, compared to the rates in effect prior to April 1, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, EGTS' provision for rate refund for April 2022 through December 2022 totaled $90 million and was included in current regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. In November 2022, the FERC approved the settlement agreement.

459


In July 2017, the FERC audit staff communicated to EGTS that it had substantially completed an audit of EGTS' compliance with the accounting and reporting requirements of the FERC's Uniform System of Accounts and provided a description of matters and preliminary recommendations. In November 2017, the FERC audit staff issued its audit report. In December 2017, EGTS provided its response to the audit report. EGTS requested FERC review of the contested findings and submitted its plan for compliance with the uncontested portions of the report. EGTS reached resolution of certain matters with the FERC in the fourth quarter of 2018. EGTS recognized a charge for a disallowance of plant, originally established beginning in 2012, for the resolution of one matter with the FERC. In December 2020, the FERC issued a final ruling on the remaining matter, which resulted in a $43 million ($31 million after-tax) estimated charge for disallowance of capitalized AFUDC, recorded in disallowance and abandonment of utility plant on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As a condition of the December 2020 ruling, EGTS filed its proposed accounting entries and supporting documentation with the FERC during the second quarter of 2021. During the finalization of these entries, EGTS refined the estimated charge for disallowance of capitalized AFUDC, which resulted in a reduction to the estimated charge of $11 million ($8 million after-tax) that was recorded in disallowance and abandonment of utility plant on the Consolidated Statement of Operations in the second quarter of 2021. In September 2021, the FERC approved EGTS' accounting entries and supporting documentation.

In December 2014, EGTS entered into a precedent agreement with Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC ("Atlantic Cost Pipeline") for the project previously intended for EGTS to provide approximately 1,500,000 decatherms ("Dth") of firm transmission service to various customers in connection with the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project ("Supply Header Project"). As a result of the cancellation of the Atlantic Coast Pipeline project, in the second quarter of 2020 EGTS recorded a charge of $482 million ($359 million after-tax) in disallowance and abandonment of utility plant on the Consolidated Statement of Operations associated with the probable abandonment of a significant portion of the project as well as the establishment of a $75 million ARO. In the third quarter of 2020, EGTS recorded an additional charge of $10 million ($7 million after-tax) associated with the probable abandonment of a significant portion of the project and a $29 million ($20 million after-tax) benefit from a revision to the previously established ARO, both of which were recorded in disallowance and abandonment of utility plant on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As EGTS evaluates its future use, approximately $40 million remains within property, plant and equipment for a potential modified project.

(8)    Investments and Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

Investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):

20222021
Investments:
Investment funds$14 $13 
Restricted cash and cash equivalents:
Customer deposits29 15 
Total restricted cash and cash equivalents29 15 
Total investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents$43 $28 
Reflected as:
Current assets$29 $15 
Noncurrent assets14 13 
Total investments and restricted cash and cash equivalents$43 $28 

460


(9)    Long-term Debt

On June 30, 2021, Eastern Energy Gas exchanged a total of $1.6 billion of its issued and outstanding third-party notes for new notes, making EGTS the primary obligor of the new notes. The terms of the new notes are substantially similar to the terms of the original Eastern Energy Gas notes. The debt exchange was a common control transaction accounted for as a debt modification. As such, no gain or loss was recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and approximately $17 million of unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs and $32 million of deferred losses on previously settled interest rate swaps remaining in AOCI were contributed to EGTS by Eastern Energy Gas in connection with the transaction. In addition, new fees of $2 million paid directly to note holders in connection with the exchange were deferred as additional debt issuance costs that will be amortized over the lives of the respective notes. As a result of the transaction, EGTS' $1.9 billion of long-term indebtedness to Eastern Energy Gas was cancelled in full and the remaining balance was satisfied through a capital contribution.

EGTS' long-term debt consists of the following, including unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs, as of December 31 (dollars in millions):

Par Value20222021
3.60% Senior Notes, due 2024$111 $110 $110 
3.00% Senior Notes, due 2029426 422 422 
4.80% Senior Notes, due 2043346 342 341 
4.60% Senior Notes, due 2044444 437 437 
3.90% Senior Notes, due 2049273 271 271 
Total long-term debt$1,600 $1,582 $1,581 
Annual Payment on Long-Term Debt

The annual repayments of long-term debt for the years beginning January 1, 2023 and thereafter, are as follows (in millions):

2023$— 
2024111 
2025— 
2026— 
2027— 
2028 and thereafter1,489 
Total1,600 
Unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs(18)
Total$1,582 

AOCI

The following table presents selected information related to losses on interest rate cash flow hedges included in AOCI in EGTS' Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):

AOCI After-TaxAmounts Expected to be Reclassified to Earnings During the Next 12 Months After-TaxMaximum Term
Interest rate$(30)$(2)264 months

EGTS reclassified $2 million and $1 million from AOCI to interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.


461


(10)    Income Taxes

Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Current:
Federal$$(22)$48 
State12 (10)
17 (32)54 
Deferred:
Federal64 67 (93)
State28 26 (28)
92 93 (121)
Total$109 $61 $(67)

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the effective income tax rate applicable to income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit) is as follows for the years ended December 31:

202220212020
Federal statutory income tax rate21 %21 %21 %
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit
Effects of ratemaking— — 
AFUDC-equity— — 
Write-off of regulatory assets— — (3)
Other, net(1)(1)(1)
Effective income tax rate29 %28 %27 %

The net deferred income tax asset consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):

20222021
Deferred income tax assets:
Federal and state carryforwards$$— 
Employee benefits22 31 
Intangibles and goodwill265 298 
Derivatives and hedges11 12 
Other
Total deferred income tax assets308 345 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Property related items(146)(77)
Debt exchange(53)(60)
Employee benefits(4)(9)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(203)(146)
Net deferred income tax asset(1)
$105 $199 
(1)Net deferred income tax asset, as of both December 31, 2022 and 2021, is presented in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

462


As of December 31, 2022, EGTS' state tax carryforwards, entirely related to $6 million of net operating losses, expire at various intervals between 2036 and indefinite.

Through October 31, 2020, EGTS was included in DEI's consolidated federal income tax return and, where applicable, combined state income tax returns. As a result of the GT&S Transaction, DEI retained the rights and obligations of EGTS' federal and state income tax returns through October 31, 2020. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has not closed or effectively settled an examination of EGTS' income tax returns for any tax years beginning on or after November 1, 2020. The statute of limitations for EGTS' states remains open for periods beginning on or after November 1, 2020. The closure of examinations, or the expiration of the statute of limitations, for state filings may not preclude the state from adjusting the state net operating loss carryforward utilized in a year for which the statute of limitations is not closed.

(11)    Employee Benefit Plans

As discussed in Note 3, in November 2020, the GT&S Transaction was completed and the assets and obligations of the pension and other postretirement employee benefit plans associated with the operations sold and relating to services provided before closing were retained by DEI. As a result, just prior to completing the sale, net benefit plan assets of $904 million were distributed through an equity transaction with DEI.

Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction

Defined Benefit Plans

Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction, EGTS is a participant in benefit plans sponsored by MidAmerican Energy, an affiliate. The MidAmerican Energy Company Retirement Plan includes a qualified pension plan that provides pension benefits for eligible employees. The MidAmerican Energy Company Welfare Benefit Plan provides certain postretirement health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees on behalf of EGTS. EGTS made $12 million, $16 million and $2 million of contributions to the MidAmerican Energy Company Retirement Plan for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. EGTS made $2 million, $9 million and $2 million of contributions to the MidAmerican Energy Company Welfare Benefit Plan for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Contributions related to these plans are reflected as net periodic benefit cost in operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amounts attributable to EGTS were allocated from MidAmerican Energy in accordance with the intercompany administrative service agreement. Offsetting regulatory assets and liabilities have been recorded related to the amounts not yet recognized as a component of net periodic benefit costs that will be included in regulated rates.

Defined Contribution Plan

EGTS participates in the BHE GT&S defined contribution employee savings plan subsequent to the GT&S Transaction. EGTS' matching contributions are based on each participant's level of contribution. Contributions cannot exceed the maximum allowable for tax purposes. EGTS' contributions to the 401(k) plan were $5 million and $4 million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively

Prior to the GT&S Transaction

Defined Benefit Plans

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, certain EGTS employees not represented by collective bargaining units were covered by the Dominion Energy Pension Plan, a defined benefit pension plan sponsored by DEI that provides benefits to multiple DEI subsidiaries. As participating employers, EGTS was subject to DEI's funding policy, which was to contribute annually an amount that is in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. EGTS' net periodic pension credit related to this plan was $17 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, reflected in operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. The funded status of various DEI subsidiary groups and employee compensation are the basis for determining the share of total pension costs for participating DEI subsidiaries.

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, certain retiree healthcare and life insurance benefits for EGTS employees not represented by collective bargaining units were covered by the Dominion Energy Retiree Health and Welfare Plan, a plan sponsored by DEI that provides certain retiree healthcare and life insurance benefits to multiple DEI subsidiaries. EGTS' net periodic benefit credit related to this plan was $5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, reflected in operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. Employee headcount is the basis for determining the share of total other postretirement benefit costs for participating DEI subsidiaries.

463


Pension benefits for EGTS employees represented by collective bargaining units were covered by a separate pension plan that provides benefits to employees of both EGTS and Hope Gas, Inc. ("Hope"). Employee compensation was the basis for allocating pension costs and obligations between EGTS and Hope. Retiree healthcare and life insurance benefits, for EGTS employees represented by a collective bargaining unit, were covered by a separate other postretirement benefit plan that provides benefits to both EGTS and Hope. Employee headcount was the basis for allocating other postretirement benefit costs and obligations between EGTS and Hope.

Pension Remeasurement

In the third quarter of 2020, EGTS remeasured a pension plan due to a curtailment resulting from the agreement for DEI to retain the assets and obligations of the pension benefit plan associated with the GT&S Transaction. The remeasurement resulted in an increase in the pension benefit obligation of $3 million and a decrease in the fair value of the pension plan assets of $7 million for EGTS. The impact of the remeasurement on net periodic pension benefit credit was recognized prospectively from the remeasurement date and was not material. The discount rate used for the remeasurement was 3.16%. All other assumptions used for the remeasurement were consistent with the measurement as of December 31, 2019.

Net Periodic Benefit Credit

Net periodic benefit credit for the plans included the following components for the year ended December 31, 2020 (in millions):

PensionOther Postretirement
Service cost$$
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets(47)(16)
Net amortization(3)
Net periodic benefit credit$(31)$(14)

Significant assumptions used to determine periodic credits for the year ended December 31, 2020:

PensionOther Postretirement
Discount rate3.16% - 3.63%3.44 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets8.60 %8.50 %
Weighted average rate of increase for compensation4.73 %N/A
Healthcare cost trend rate6.50 %
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)5.00 %
Year that the rate reached the ultimate trend rate2026

Defined Contribution Plans

EGTS participated in the DEI defined contribution employee savings plans prior to the GT&S Transaction. EGTS' matching contributions were based on each participant's level of contribution. Contributions could not exceed the maximum allowable for tax purposes. EGTS' contributions to the 401(k) plan were $2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

(12)    Asset Retirement Obligations

EGTS estimates its ARO liabilities based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash spending for a third party to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and then discounted at a credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. Changes in estimates could occur for a number of reasons, including changes in laws and regulations, plan revisions, inflation and changes in the amount and timing of the expected work.

464


EGTS does not recognize liabilities for AROs for which the fair value cannot be reasonably estimated. Due to the indeterminate removal date, the fair value of the interim removal of natural gas pipelines and certain storage wells in EGTS' underground natural gas storage network cannot currently be estimated, and no amounts are recognized on the Consolidated Financial Statements other than those included in the cost of removal regulatory liability established via approved depreciation rates in accordance with accepted regulatory practices. Cost of removal regulatory liabilities totaled $24 million and $16 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. EGTS will continue to monitor operational and strategic developments to identify if sufficient information exists to reasonably estimate a retirement date for these assets.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of EGTS' ARO liabilities for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

20222021
Beginning balance$55 $71 
Additions— 
Retirements(12)(17)
Accretion
Ending balance$48 $55 
Reflected as:
Current liabilities$25 $33 
Other long-term liabilities23 22 
Total ARO liability$48 $55 

(13)    Risk Management and Hedging Activities

EGTS is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in commodity prices, principally, to natural gas market fluctuations primarily related to fuel retained and used during the operation of the pipeline system as well as lost and unaccounted for gas. EGTS has established a risk management process that is designed to identify, assess, manage, mitigate, monitor and report, each of the various types of risk involved in its business. To mitigate a portion of its commodity price risk, EGTS uses commodity derivative contracts, which may include forwards, futures, options, swaps and other agreements, to effectively secure future supply or sell future production generally at fixed prices. EGTS does not hedge all of its commodity price risk, thereby exposing the unhedged portion to changes in market prices. See Note 14 for further information about fair value measurements and associated valuation methods for derivatives.

There have been no significant changes in EGTS' accounting policies related to derivatives. Refer to Notes 2 and 14 for additional information on derivative contracts.

Credit Risk

EGTS is exposed to counterparty credit risk associated with wholesale energy supply and marketing activities with other utilities, energy marketing companies, financial institutions and other market participants. Credit risk may be concentrated to the extent EGTS' counterparties have similar economic, industry or other characteristics and due to direct or indirect relationships among the counterparties. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the ten largest customers provided 38% of the total storage and transmission revenues. Before entering into a transaction, EGTS analyzes the financial condition of each significant wholesale counterparty, establishes limits on the amount of unsecured credit to be extended to each counterparty and evaluates the appropriateness of unsecured credit limits on an ongoing basis. To further mitigate wholesale counterparty credit risk, EGTS enters into netting and collateral arrangements that may include margining and cross-product netting agreements and obtains third-party guarantees, letters of credit and cash deposits. If required, EGTS exercises rights under these arrangements, including calling on the counterparty's credit support arrangement.

465


(14)    Fair Value Measurements

The carrying value of EGTS' cash, certain cash equivalents, receivables, payables, accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term maturity of these instruments. EGTS has various financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on the Consolidated Financial Statements using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. A financial asset or liability classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels are as follows:

Level 1 - Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that EGTS has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 - Inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 - Unobservable inputs reflect EGTS' judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability since limited market data exists. EGTS develops these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.

The following table presents EGTS' financial assets and liabilities recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in millions):

Input Levels for Fair Value Measurements
Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
As of December 31, 2022
Assets:
Commodity derivatives$— $$— $
Money market mutual funds— — 
Equity securities:
Investment funds14 — — 14 
$22 $$— $23 
As of December 31, 2021
Assets:
Equity securities:
Investment funds$13 $— $— $13 
$13 $— $— $13 

EGTS' investments in money market mutual funds and investment funds are stated at fair value. When available, a readily observable quoted market price or net asset value of an identical security in an active market is used to record the fair value.

Derivative contracts are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either assets or liabilities and are stated at estimated fair value unless they are designated as normal purchase or normal sales and qualify for the exception afforded by GAAP. When available, the fair value of derivative contracts is estimated using unadjusted quoted prices for identical contracts in the market in which EGTS transacts. When quoted prices for identical contracts are not available, EGTS uses forward price curves. Forward price curves represent EGTS' estimates of the prices at which a buyer or seller could contract today for delivery or settlement at future dates. EGTS bases its forward price curves upon market price quotations, when available, or internally developed and commercial models, with internal and external fundamental data inputs. Market price quotations are obtained from independent brokers, exchanges, direct communication with market participants and actual transactions executed by EGTS. Market price quotations are generally readily obtainable for the applicable term of EGTS' outstanding derivative contracts; therefore, EGTS' forward price curves reflect observable market quotes. Market price quotations for certain natural gas trading hubs are not as readily obtainable due to the length of the contracts. Given that limited market data exists for these contracts, as well as for those contracts that are not actively traded, EGTS uses forward price curves derived from internal models based on perceived pricing relationships to major trading hubs that are based on unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value of these derivative contracts is a function of underlying forward commodity prices, related volatility, counterparty creditworthiness and duration of contracts.
466



EGTS' long-term debt is carried at cost, including unamortized premiums, discounts and debt issuance costs as applicable, on the Consolidated Financial Statements. The fair value of EGTS' long-term debt is a Level 2 fair value measurement and has been estimated based upon quoted market prices, where available, or at the present value of future cash flows discounted at rates consistent with comparable maturities with similar credit risks. The following table presents the carrying value and estimated fair value of EGTS' long-term debt as of December 31 (in millions):
20222021
CarryingFairCarryingFair
ValueValueValueValue
Long-term debt$1,582 $1,337 $1,581 $1,812 

(15)    Commitments and Contingencies

Environmental Laws and Regulations

EGTS is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding air quality, climate change, emissions performance standards, water quality and other environmental matters that have the potential to impact its current and future operations. EGTS believes it is in material compliance with all applicable laws and regulations.

Carbon Regulations

In August 2016, the EPA issued a draft rule proposing to reaffirm that a source's obligation to obtain a prevention of significant deterioration or Title V permit for greenhouse gases ("GHG") is triggered only if such permitting requirements are first triggered by non-GHG, or conventional, pollutants that are regulated by the New Source Review program, and to set a significant emissions rate at 75,000 tons per year of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions under which a source would not be required to apply best available control technology for its GHG emissions. Until the EPA ultimately takes final action on this rulemaking, EGTS cannot predict the impact to its results of operations, financial condition and/or cash flows.

Legal Matters

EGTS is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. EGTS does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.

Surety Bonds

As of December 31, 2022, EGTS had purchased $16 million of surety bonds. Under the terms of the surety bonds, Eastern Energy Gas is obligated to indemnify the respective surety bond company for any amounts paid.

467


(16)    Revenue from Contracts with Customers

The following table summarizes EGTS' Customer Revenue by regulated and other, with further disaggregation of regulated by line of business, for the years ended December 31 (in millions):

202220212020
Customer Revenue:
Regulated:
Gas transmission$644 $574 $583 
Gas storage248 188 191 
Wholesale57 41 
Total regulated900 819 815 
Management services and other revenues79 73 100 
Total Customer Revenue979 892 915 
Other revenue(1)
(6)(1)
Total operating revenue$973 $891 $916 

(1)Other revenue consists primarily of revenue recognized in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 815, "Derivative and Hedging" and includes unrealized gains and losses for derivatives not designated as hedges related to natural gas sales contracts.

Remaining Performance Obligations

The following table summarizes EGTS' revenue it expects to recognize in future periods related to significant unsatisfied remaining performance obligations for fixed contracts with expected durations in excess of one year as of December 31, 2022 (in millions):

Performance obligations expected to be satisfied
Less than 12 monthsMore than 12 monthsTotal
EGTS$766 $3,431 $4,197 

(17)    Variable Interest Entities

The primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity ("VIE") is required to consolidate the VIE and to disclose certain information about its significant variable interests in the VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the entity that has both: (1) the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

EGTS had been engaged to oversee the construction of, and to subsequently operate and maintain, the projects undertaken by Atlantic Coast Pipeline based on the overall direction and oversight of Atlantic Coast Pipeline's members. Prior to the GT&S Transaction, an affiliate of EGTS held a membership interest in Atlantic Coast Pipeline; therefore, EGTS was considered to have a variable interest in Atlantic Coast Pipeline. Prior to the cancellation of the project in 2020, the members of Atlantic Coast Pipeline held the power to direct the construction, operations and maintenance activities of the entity. EGTS concluded it was not the primary beneficiary of Atlantic Coast Pipeline as it did not have the power to direct the activities of Atlantic Coast Pipeline that most significantly impacted its economic performance. EGTS had no obligation to absorb any losses of the VIE.

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, EGTS purchased shared services from Dominion Energy Services, Inc. ("DES"), an affiliated VIE, of $53 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. EGTS determined that neither it nor any of its consolidated entities was the primary beneficiary of DES as neither it nor any of its consolidated entities had both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance as well as the obligation to absorb losses and benefits which could be significant to them. DES provided accounting, legal, finance and certain administrative and technical services. Neither EGTS nor any of its consolidated entities had any obligation to absorb more than its allocated share of DES costs.

468


(18)    Supplemental Cash Flow Disclosures

The summary of supplemental cash flow disclosures as of and for the years ended December 31 is as follows (in millions):

202220212020
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$67 $71 $82 
Income taxes paid (received), net$$(12)$58 
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:
Accruals related to property, plant and equipment additions$15 $29 $25 
Equity dividends(1)
$(21)$(58)$— 
Equity contributions(2)
$34 $292 $— 
Acquisition of EGTS by BHE$— $— $40 

(1)Equity dividends represents the forgiveness of affiliated receivables.
(2)Equity contributions for the year ended December 31, 2021 primarily reflect the impacts from the intercompany debt exchange with Eastern Energy Gas. See Note 9 for more information regarding the intercompany debt exchange with Eastern Energy Gas.

(19)    Related Party Transactions

Transactions Prior to the GT&S Transaction

Prior to the GT&S Transaction, EGTS engaged in related party transactions primarily with other DEI subsidiaries (affiliates). EGTS' receivable and payable balances with affiliates were settled based on contractual terms or on a monthly basis, depending on the nature of the underlying transactions. Through October 31, 2020, EGTS was included in DEI's consolidated federal income tax return and, where applicable, combined state income tax returns. All affiliate payables or receivables were settled with DEI prior to the closing date of the GT&S Transaction.

EGTS transacted with affiliates for certain quantities of natural gas and other commodities at market prices in the ordinary course of business. Additionally, EGTS provided transmission and storage services to affiliates. EGTS also entered into certain other contracts with affiliates, and related parties, including construction services, which were presented separately from contracts involving commodities or services. EGTS participated in certain DEI benefit plans as described in Note 11.

DES and other affiliates provided accounting, legal, finance and certain administrative and technical services to EGTS. EGTS provided certain services to related parties, including technical services.

The financial statements for the year ended 2020 includes costs for certain general, administrative and corporate expenses assigned by DES to EGTS on the basis of direct and allocated methods in accordance with EGTS' services agreements with DES. Where costs incurred cannot be determined by specific identification, the costs were allocated based on the proportional level of effort devoted by DES resources that is attributable to the entity, determined by reference to number of employees, salaries and wages and other similar measures for the relevant DES service. Management believes the assumptions and methodologies underlying the allocation of general corporate overhead expenses are reasonable.

Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction EGTS' transactions with other DEI subsidiaries are no longer related party transactions.

469


Presented below are EGTS' significant transactions with DES and other affiliated and related parties for the year ended December 31 (in millions):
2020
Sales of natural gas segments.and transmission and storage services$71 
Purchases of natural gas and transmission and storage services
Services provided by related parties(1)
67 
Services provided to related parties(2)
86 

(1)Includes capitalized expenditures of $14 million.
(16)    Unaudited Quarterly Operating Results(2)Includes amounts attributable to Atlantic Coast Pipeline, a related party VIE prior to the GT&S Transaction. See below for more information.


EGTS provided services to Atlantic Coast Pipeline, which totaled $46 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, included in operating revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Transactions Subsequent to the GT&S Transaction

EGTS is party to a tax-sharing agreement and is part of the Berkshire Hathaway Inc. consolidated U.S. federal income tax return. For current federal and state income taxes, EGTS had a receivable from BHE of $21 million and $11 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. EGTS received net cash receipts for federal and state income taxes from BHE totaling $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, and paid net cash payments for federal and state income taxes to BHE totaling $7 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Trade receivables, net as of both December 31, 2022 and 2021 included $2 million of accrued unbilled revenue. This revenue is based on estimated amounts of services provided but not yet billed to an affiliate.

As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, EGTS had $10 million and $8 million, respectively, of natural gas imbalances payable to affiliates, presented in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

EGTS participates in certain MidAmerican Energy benefit plans as described in Note 11. As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, EGTS' amount due to MidAmerican Energy associated with these plans and reflected in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets was $47 million and $85 million, respectively.

Presented below are EGTS' significant transactions with related parties for the years ended December 31 (in millions):


202220212020
Sales of natural gas and transmission and storage services$26 $28 $
Purchases of natural gas and transmission and storage services— 
Services provided by related parties46 26 
Services provided to related parties62 57 10 

Borrowings With Eastern Energy Gas

EGTS has a $400 million intercompany revolving credit agreement from its parent, Eastern Energy Gas, expiring in November 2023. The credit agreement, which is for general corporate purposes, has a variable interest rate based on the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") plus a fixed spread. Net outstanding borrowings totaled $36 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 1.43% as of December 31, 2022 and $68 million with a weighted-average interest rate of 0.51% as of December 31, 2021. Interest expense related to these borrowings totaled $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.

In March 2021, Eastern Energy Gas entered into a $400 million intercompany revolving credit agreement from EGTS that currently expires in March 2024. The credit agreement, which is for general corporate purposes, has a variable interest rate based on SOFR plus a fixed spread. Net outstanding borrowings totaled $2,071 as of December 31, 2021. Interest income related to this borrowing totaled $2,071 for the year ended December 31, 2021.

470


 Three-Month Periods Ended
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
 2017 2017 2017 2017
Regulated electric operating revenue$159
 $160
 $215
 $179
Regulated natural gas operating revenue34
 17
 15
 33
Operating income46
 36
 75
 41
Net income24
 17
 44
 24
        
 Three-Month Periods Ended
 March 31, June 30, September 30, December 31,
 2016 2016 2016 2016
Regulated electric operating revenue$170
 $162
 $207
 $163
Regulated natural gas operating revenue47
 19
 15
 29
Operating income41
 28
 69
 42
Net income17
 10
 38
 19
EGTS had also borrowed from Eastern Energy Gas pursuant to a series of long-term notes with fixed interest rates ranging from 3.6% to 5.0%, due 2024 to 2047. EGTS incurred interest charges related to these borrowings of $44 million and $88 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. Refer to Note 9 for more information.

471



Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure


None.


Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Item 9A.Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures


At the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, each of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company, PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Funding, LLC, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company, and Sierra Pacific Power Company, Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC and Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. carried out separate evaluations, under the supervision and with the participation of each such entity's management, including its Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and its Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), or persons performing similar functions, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon these evaluations, management of each such entity, including its Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and its Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), or persons performing similar functions, in each case, concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures for such entity were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by such entity in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC'sU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and its Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), or persons performing similar functions, in each case, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure by it. Each such entity hereby states that there has been no change in its internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 20172022 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.


Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting


Management of each of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company, PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Funding, LLC, MidAmerican Energy Company, Nevada Power Company, and Sierra Pacific Power Company and Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC, respectively, is responsible for establishing and maintaining, for such entity, adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of management for each such entity, including its Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and its Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), or persons performing similar functions, in each case, such management conducted an evaluation for the relevant entity of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, as required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rule 13a-15(c). In making this assessment, management for each such respective entity used the criteria set forth in the framework in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the evaluation conducted under the framework in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)," management for each such respective entity concluded that internal control over financial reporting for such entity was effective as of December 31, 2017.2022.


This first Annual Report on Form 10-K for Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc. does not include a report of management's assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting due to a transition period established by U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission rules applicable to new registrants. Management will be required to provide an assessment of the effectiveness of Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.'s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023.

Berkshire Hathaway Energy CompanyPacifiCorpMidAmerican Funding, LLC
February 24, 2023February 24, 2023February 24, 2023
Berkshire Hathaway Energy CompanyPacifiCorpMidAmerican Funding, LLC
February 23, 2018February 23, 2018February 23, 2018
MidAmerican Energy CompanyNevada Power CompanySierra Pacific Power Company
February 23, 201824, 2023February 23, 201824, 2023February 23, 201824, 2023

Item 9B.Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLCOther InformationEastern Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.
February 24, 2023February 24, 2023


472


Item 9B.Other Information

None.



473


PART III


Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY, MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, MIDAMERICAN ENERGY, NEVADA POWER, AND SIERRA PACIFIC, EASTERN ENERGY GAS AND EGTS


Information required by Item 10 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) to Form 10-K.


PACIFICORP


PacifiCorp is an indirect subsidiary of BHE, and its directors consist of executive management from both BHE and PacifiCorp. Each director was elected based on individual responsibilities, experience in the energy industry and functional expertise. There are no family relationships among the executive officers, nor any arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and any other person pursuant to which the executive officer was appointed. Set forth below is certain information, as of February 16, 2018,January 31, 2023, with respect to the current directors and executive officers of PacifiCorp:


WILLIAM J. FEHRMANSCOTT W. THON, 57, Chairman59,Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer since January 2018.April 2022. Mr. FehrmanThon has also been President Chief Executive Officerof Operations for Berkshire Hathaway Energy since April 2022. Mr. Thon previously served as President and director of BHE since January 2018. Mr. Fehrman was Chief Executive Officer of MidAmerican Energy Company from 2008 to January2018BHE Canada since 2014 and Presidentthe Chief Executive Officer of its largest Canadian subsidiary, AltaLink, since 2002. Mr. Thon has led the investment and director from 2007 to January 2018. Mr. Fehrman joined BHEconstruction of significant energy infrastructure developments in 2006Alberta, Canada and has extensive executive management experience in the energy industry with strong regulatory and operational skills.globally.


STEFAN A. BIRD, 51,56, Director since 2015. President and Chief Executive Officer of Pacific Power and director since 2015. Mr. Bird was Senior Vice President, Commercial and Trading, of PacifiCorp Energy from 2007 to 2014. Mr. Bird joined BHE in 1998 and has significant operational, public policy and leadership experience in the energy industry, including expertise in energy supply management, resource acquisition and federal and state regulatory matters.


CINDY A. CRANE, 56,GARY W. HOOGEVEEN, 54, Director since November 2018, President since June 2018 and Chief Executive Officer since November 2018 of Rocky Mountain Power. Prior to his current positions, Mr. Hoogeveen served as Senior Vice President and Chief ExecutiveCommercial Officer of Rocky Mountain Power since November 2014 and director since 2015. Ms. Crane wasPresident and CEO of Kern River Gas Transmission Company from 2010 to 2014. He joined Kern River after serving as Vice President of Interwest MiningCustomer Service and Business Development for Northern Natural Gas Company. Prior to joining Northern Natural Gas Company, a subsidiary of PacifiCorp, from 2009 to 2014. Ms. Crane joined PacifiCorpMr. Hoogeveen held various management positions at Berkshire Hathaway Energy, joining BHE in 1990 and2000. He has significant strategy, operational, public policy and leadership experience in both the energy industry,electricity and natural gas industries, including complex commercial negotiations.customer, regulatory and government relations.


NIKKI L. KOBLIHA, 45,50, Director since 2017. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2015 and Treasurer and director since 2017. Ms. Kobliha joined PacifiCorp in 1997 and has significant financial, accounting and leadership experience in the energy industry, including expertise in financial reporting to the SEC and FERC.


PATRICK J. GOODMANCALVIN D. HAACK, 51,54, Director since 2006.May 2020. Mr. GoodmanHaack has been ExecutiveSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of BHE since 2012March 2020 and was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerTreasurer of BHE from 19992010 to 2012.2020. Mr. GoodmanHaack joined BHE in 19951997 and has significant financial experience, including expertise in mergers and acquisitions, accounting, treasury and tax functions. Mr. GoodmanHaack is also a manager of MidAmerican Funding, LLC and Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC.


NATALIE L. HOCKEN, 48,53, Director since 2007. Ms. Hocken has been Senior Vice President and General Counsel of BHE since 2015 and Corporate Secretary since 2017. Ms. Hocken was Senior Vice President, Transmission and System Operations of PacifiCorp from 2012 to 2015 and Vice President and General Counsel of Pacific Power from 2007 to 2012. Ms. Hocken joined PacifiCorp in 2002 and has significant experience in the utility industry, including expertise in transmission, legal matters and federal and state regulatory matters. Ms. Hocken is also a manager of MidAmerican Funding, LLC and Eastern Energy Gas Holdings, LLC.


Board's Role in the Risk Oversight Process


PacifiCorp's Board of Directors is comprised of a combination of BHE senior executives and PacifiCorp senior management who have direct and indirect responsibility for the management and oversight of risk. PacifiCorp's Board of Directors has not established a separate risk management and oversight committee.


474


Audit Committee and Audit Committee Financial Expert


During the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, and as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, PacifiCorp's Board of Directors did not have an audit committee. PacifiCorp is not required to have an audit committee as its common stock is indirectly and wholly owned by BHE. However, the audit committee of BHE acts as the audit committee for PacifiCorp.


Code of Ethics


PacifiCorp has adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officer, its principal financial and accounting officer, or persons acting in such capacities, and certain other covered officers. The code of ethics is incorporated by reference in the exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Item 11.Executive Compensation

Item 11.Executive Compensation

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY, MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, MIDAMERICAN ENERGY, NEVADA POWER, AND SIERRA PACIFIC, EASTERN ENERGY GAS AND EGTS


Information required by Item 11 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) to Form 10-K.


PACIFICORP


Compensation Discussion and Analysis


Compensation Philosophy and Overall Objectives


On April 13, 2022, Mr. Gregory E. Abel,William J. Fehrman resigned as PacifiCorp's ChairmanChair of the Board of Directors ("Chair") and Chief Executive Officer or Chairman("CEO") and CEO,Mr. Scott W. Thon was elected as PacifiCorp's Chair and CEO. Neither Mr. Fehrman nor Mr. Thon received noany direct compensation from PacifiCorp.PacifiCorp in 2022. PacifiCorp reimbursed its indirect parent company, BHE, for the cost of Mr. Abel'sFehrman's and Mr. Thon's time spent on matters supporting PacifiCorp, including compensation paid to himthem by BHE, pursuant to an intercompany administrative services agreement among BHE and its subsidiaries. On January 10, 2018, Mr. Gregory E. Abel resigned as PacifiCorp's Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. William J. Fehrman was elected as PacifiCorp's Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer.


PacifiCorp believes that the compensation paid to each of its Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, and its other most highly compensated executive officers, to whom PacifiCorp refers collectively as its Named Executive Officers, or NEOs, should be closely aligned with itsPacifiCorp's overall performance, and each NEO's contribution to that performance, on both a short- and long-term basis, and that such compensation should be sufficient to attract and retain highly qualified leaders who can create significant value for the organization. PacifiCorp's compensation programs are designed to provide its NEOs meaningful incentives for superior corporate and individual performance. Performance is evaluated on a subjective basis within the context of both financial and non-financial objectives, among which are customer service, employee commitment, environmental respect, regulatory integrity, operational excellence and financial strength, which PacifiCorp believes contribute to its long-term success.


How Compensation is Compensation Determined


PacifiCorp's compensation committee consists solely of the ChairmanChair and CEO. On January 10, 2018, Mr. Fehrman replaced Mr. Abel as the sole member of PacifiCorp's compensation committee. Mr. Fehrman also serves as BHE's President and Chief Executive Officer. The ChairmanChair and CEO is responsible for the establishment and oversight of PacifiCorp's compensation policy and for approving compensation decisions for its NEOs, such as approving base pay increases, incentive and performance awards, off-cycle pay changes, and participation in other employee benefit plans and programs.


PacifiCorp's criteria for assessing executive performance and determining compensation in any year is inherently subjective and is not based upon specific formulas or weighting of factors. PacifiCorp does not specifically use other companies as benchmarks when establishing its NEOs' compensation.



475


Discussion and Analysis of Specific Compensation Elements


Base Salary


PacifiCorp determines base salaries for all of its NEOs, other than the ChairmanChair and CEO, by reviewing its overall performance, and each NEO's performance, the value each NEO brings to PacifiCorp and general labor market conditions. Base salary is intended to compensate NEOs for services rendered during the fiscal year and to provide sufficient cash income for retention and recruitment purposes. While base salary provides a base level of compensation intended to be competitive with the external market, the annual base salary adjustment for each NEO, other than the ChairmanChair and CEO, is determined on a subjective basis after consideration of these factors and is not based on target percentiles or other formal criteria. All merit increases are approved by the ChairmanChair and CEO and take effect in the last payroll period of the year. An increase or decrease in base salary may also result from a promotion or other significant change in aan NEO's responsibilities during the year. For 2017,2022, base salaries for all NEOs, other than the ChairmanChair and CEO, increased on average by 2.55%2.27% effective December 26, 2016,2021, reflecting merit increases.


Short-Term Incentive Compensation


The objective of short-term incentive compensation is to reward the achievement of significant annual corporate and business unit goals while also providing NEOs with competitive total cash compensation.


Annual Incentive Plan


Under PacifiCorp's Annual Incentive Plan, or AIP, all NEOs, other than the ChairmanChair and CEO, are eligible to earn an annual discretionary cash incentive award, which is determined on a subjective basis at the ChairmanChair and CEO's sole discretion and is not based on a specific formula or cap. The ChairmanChair and CEO considers a variety of factors in determining each NEO's annual incentive award including the NEO's performance, PacifiCorp's overall performance and each NEO's contribution to that overall performance. The ChairmanChair and CEO evaluates performance using financial and non-financial objectives, including customer service, employee commitment, environmental respect, regulatory integrity, operational excellence and financial strength, as well as the NEO's response to issues and opportunities that arise during the year. No factor was individually material to the ChairmanChair and CEO's determination regarding the amounts paid to each NEO under the AIP for 2017.2022. Approved awards are paid prior to year-end.


Performance Awards


In addition to the annual awards under the AIP, PacifiCorp may grant cash performance awards periodically during the year to one or more NEOs, other than the ChairmanChair and CEO, to reward the accomplishment of significant non-recurring tasks or projects. These awards are discretionary and are approved by the ChairmanChair and CEO. In 2017,2022, a cash performance award was granted to Mr. Bird and Ms. CraneKobliha in recognition of theirher outstanding efforts.


Long-Term Incentive Compensation


The objective of long-term incentive compensation is to retain NEOs, reward their exceptional performance and motivate them to create long-term, sustainable value. PacifiCorp's current long-term incentive compensation program is cash-based. PacifiCorp does not utilize stock options or other forms of equity-based awards.



476


Long-Term Incentive Partnership Plan


The PacifiCorp Long-Term Incentive Partnership Plan, or LTIP, is designed to retain key employees and to align PacifiCorp's interests and the interests of the participating employees. All of PacifiCorp's NEOs, other than the ChairmanChair and CEO, participate in the LTIP. The LTIP provides for annual discretionary awards based upon significant accomplishments by the individual participants and the achievement of the financial and non-financial objectives previously described. The goals are developed with the objective of being attainable with a sustained, focused and concerted effort and are determined and communicated by January of each plan year. The BHE ChairmanChair and PacifiCorp's Presidents approve eligibility to participate in the LTIP and the amount of the incentive award. Awards are capped at 1.0 times base salary and finalized in the first quarter of the following year. The BHE Chairman and PacifiCorp's Presidents may grant a supplemental award to any participant for the award year separate from the incentive award, subject to the same terms and conditions as the incentive award. PacifiCorp's Presidents may participate in the LTIP but only the BHE ChairmanChair shall make determinations regarding their participation and the value of their incentive award. These cash-based awards are subject to mandatory deferral and equal annual vesting over a four-year period starting in the performance year. Participants allocate the value of their deferral accounts among various investment alternatives. Gains or losses may be incurred based on investment performance. Participating NEOs may elect to defer all or a part of the award or receive payment in cash after the four-year mandatory deferral and vesting period. Vested balances (including any investment gains or losses thereon) of terminating participants are paid at the time of termination.


Deferred Compensation Plan


PacifiCorp's Executive Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan, or DCP, provides a means for all NEOs, other than the ChairmanChair and CEO, to make voluntary deferrals of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of short-term incentive compensation awards. PacifiCorp includes the DCP as part of the participating NEO's overall compensation in order to provide a comprehensive, competitive package. The deferrals and any investment returns grow on a tax-deferred basis. Amounts deferred under the DCP receive a rate of return based on the returns of any combination of various investment alternatives offered under the DCP and selected by the participant. The plan allows participants to choose from three forms of distribution. The plan permits PacifiCorp to make discretionary contributions on behalf of participants.


Potential Payments Upon Termination
PacifiCorp's NEOs other than the Chairman and CEO, are generally not entitled to severance or enhanced benefits upon termination of employment or change in control. However,None of PacifiCorp's NEOs have an employment agreement; therefore, payments upon any termination ofare determined by the applicable plan documents and our general employment PacifiCorp's other NEOs would be entitled to the vested balances in the LTIP, DCPpolicies and PacifiCorp's non-contributory defined benefit pension plan, or the Retirement Plan.practices as discussed below.


Compensation Committee Report


Mr. Fehrman,Thon, PacifiCorp's current ChairmanChair and CEO and sole member of PacifiCorp's compensation committee, has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and, based on thishis review, has recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


William J. FehrmanScott W. Thon



477


Summary Compensation Table


The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by each of PacifiCorp's NEOs during the years indicated:
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
CompensationAll Other
Name and Principal PositionYearSalary
Bonus (1)
Earnings(2)
Compensation (3)
Total (4)
Scott W. Thon(6)(7)
2022$— $— $— $— $— 
Chair of the Board of Directors2021— — — — — 
and Chief Executive Officer2020— — — — — 
William J. Fehrman(5)(6)
2022— — — — — 
Chair of the Board of Directors2021— — — — — 
and Chief Executive Officer2020— — — — — 
Stefan A. Bird2022510,000 1,134,275 — 41,525 1,685,800 
President and Chief Executive2021473,011 1,142,660 — 33,010 1,648,681 
Officer, Pacific Power2020375,000 1,327,839 17,723 33,479 1,754,041 
Gary W. Hoogeveen2022510,000 881,112 — 41,979 1,433,091 
President and Chief Executive2021473,011 1,066,924 — 33,010 1,572,945 
Officer, Rocky Mountain Power2020361,080 1,109,713 — 32,690 1,503,483 
Nikki L. Kobliha2022282,182 259,110 — 37,131 578,423 
Vice President, Chief Financial2021262,260 396,880 — 32,651 691,791 
Officer and Treasurer2020262,260 330,510 37,438 32,286 662,494 
        Change in    
        Pension    
        Value and    
        Nonqualified    
        Deferred    
        Compensation All Other  
Name and Principal Position Year Base Salary 
Bonus (1)
 
Earnings (2)
 
Compensation (3)
 
Total (4)
             
Gregory E. Abel (5)(6)
 2017 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Chairman of the Board of Directors 2016 
 
 
 
 
and Chief Executive Officer 2015 
 
 
 
 
             
Stefan A. Bird 2017 346,000
 1,116,105
 9,480
 30,965
 1,502,550
President and Chief Executive 2016 338,000
 738,784
 629
 13,958
 1,091,371
Officer, Pacific Power 2015 313,275
 844,634
 13,201
 12,614
 1,183,724
             
Cindy A. Crane 2017 346,000
 1,252,241
 45,016
 31,938
 1,675,195
President and Chief Executive 2016 338,000
 758,248
 35,752
 15,841
 1,147,841
Officer, Rocky Mountain Power 2015 324,028
 758,656
 8,589
 13,429
 1,104,702
             
Nikki L. Kobliha 2017 217,079
 122,400
 18,304
 30,415
 388,198
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer 2016 203,900
 143,004
 9,728
 29,585
 386,217
  2015 177,384
 91,758
 
 27,253
 296,395


(1)Consists of annual cash incentive awards earned pursuant to the AIP for PacifiCorp's NEOs, performance awards for Mr. Bird and Ms. Crane in recognition of efforts to support PacifiCorp's objectives and the vesting of LTIP awards and associated vested earnings. The breakout for 2017 is as follows:
(1)Consists of annual cash incentive awards earned pursuant to the AIP for PacifiCorp's NEOs, performance awards, and the vesting of LTIP awards and associated vested earnings. The breakout for 2022 is as follows:
     LTIPLTIP
   Performance Vested Vested  PerformanceVestedVested
 AIP Award Awards Earnings TotalAIPAwardAwardsEarnings (Losses)Total
Stefan A. Bird $500,000
 $100,000
 $503,178
 $12,927
 $516,105
Stefan A. Bird$450,000 $— $661,250 $23,025 $684,275 
Cindy A. Crane 500,000
 100,000
 479,093
 173,148
 652,241
Gary W. HoogeveenGary W. Hoogeveen450,000 — 530,000 (98,888)431,112 
Nikki L. Kobliha 75,000
 
 46,750
 650
 47,400
Nikki L. Kobliha106,026 50,000 162,250 (59,166)103,084 


The ultimate payouts of LTIP awards are undeterminable as the amounts to be paid out may increase or decrease depending on investment performance. BHE's ChairmanChair and PacifiCorp's Presidents establish the award categories for determining LTIP awards based on net income target goals or other criteria. In 2017,2022, the gross award was subjectively determined at the discretion of the BHE ChairmanChair and PacifiCorpPacifiCorp's Presidents based on the overall achievement of PacifiCorp's financial and non-financial objectives including customer service, employee commitment and safety, environmental respect, regulatory integrity, operational excellence and financial strength.
(2)Amounts are based upon the aggregate increase in the actuarial present value of all qualified and nonqualified defined benefit plans, which includes the Retirement Plan. Refer to the Pension Benefits table below for a discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these amounts. No participant in PacifiCorp's nonqualified deferred compensation plans earned "above market" or "preferential" earnings on amounts deferred.
(3)Amounts consist of PacifiCorp K Plus Employee Savings Plan, or 401(k) Plan, contributions PacifiCorp paid on behalf of the NEOs, except for Mr. Bird and Ms. Crane for whom PacifiCorp also includes an amount paid to each of them as a tax gross-up with respect to a personal benefit with a value less than $10,000.
(4)Any amounts voluntarily deferred by the NEO, if applicable, are included in the appropriate column in the Summary Compensation Table.
(5)Mr. Abel receives no direct compensation from PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp reimburses BHE for the cost of Mr. Abel's time spent on matters supporting PacifiCorp, including compensation paid to him by BHE, pursuant to an intercompany administrative services agreement among BHE and its subsidiaries. In 2017, PacifiCorp reimbursed BHE $123,480 for the cost of Mr. Abel's time spent on matters supporting PacifiCorp pursuant to the intercompany administrative services agreement.
(6)On January 10, 2018, Mr. Gregory E. Abel resigned as PacifiCorp's Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. William J. Fehrman was elected as PacifiCorp's Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer.

(2)Amounts are based upon the aggregate change in the actuarial present value of all qualified and nonqualified defined benefit plans, which includes the Retirement Plan. For Mr. Bird and Ms. Kobliha, such change was negative ($(23,432) and $(69,705), respectively). Refer to the Pension Benefits table below for a discussion of the assumptions used in calculating these amounts. No participant in PacifiCorp's nonqualified deferred compensation plans earned "above market" or "preferential" earnings on amounts deferred.
(3)Amounts consist of PacifiCorp K Plus Employee Savings Plan, or 401(k) Plan, contributions PacifiCorp paid on behalf of the NEOs, except for Mr. Hoogeveen for whom PacifiCorp also includes an amount paid for a tax gross-up with respect to a personal benefit with a value less than $10,000.
(4)Any amounts voluntarily deferred by the NEO, if applicable, are included in the appropriate column in the Summary Compensation Table.
(5)In 2022, PacifiCorp reimbursed BHE $118,237 for the cost of Mr. Fehrman's time spent on matters supporting PacifiCorp pursuant to the intercompany administrative services agreement.
478


(6)On April 13, 2022, Mr. William J. Fehrman resigned as PacifiCorp's Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Scott W. Thon was elected as PacifiCorp's Chair of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer.
(7)In 2022, PacifiCorp reimbursed BHE $145,283 for the cost of Mr. Thon's time spent on matters supporting PacifiCorp pursuant to the intercompany administrative services agreement.
Pension Benefits

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the defined benefit pension plan accounts held by each of PacifiCorp's NEOs as of December 31, 2017:2022:

    Number of years of Present value of
Name Plan name credited service 
accumulated benefits (1)
       
Gregory E. Abel  n/a n/a n/a
Stefan A. Bird  Retirement 10 years $177,225
Cindy A. Crane  Retirement 21 years 478,574
Nikki L. Kobliha  Retirement 12 years 123,795


(1)Amounts are computed using assumptions, other than the expected retirement age, consistent with those used in preparing the related pension disclosures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNumber of PacifiCorp in Item 8years of this Form 10-K and are asPresent value of December 31, 2017,
NamePlan namecredited service
accumulated benefits (1)
Scott W. Thonn/an/an/a
William J. Fehrmann/an/an/a
Stefan A. Bird Retirement10 years$200,512 
Gary W. Hoogeveenn/an/an/a
Nikki L. Kobliha Retirement12 years98,895 


(1)Amounts are computed using assumptions, other than the expected retirement age, consistent with those used in preparing the related pension disclosures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K and are as of December 31, 2022, which is the measurement date for the plans. The expected retirement age assumption has been determined in accordance with Instruction 2 to Item 402(h)(2) of Regulation S-K. For the Retirement Plan calculations of the present value of accumulated benefits, the following assumptions were used: 60% lump sum payment; 40% joint and 100% survivor annuity if participant is married and 40% single life annuity if participant is single. The present value assumptions used in calculating the present value of accumulated benefits for the Retirement Plan were as follows: a discount rate of 3.60%; an expected retirement age of 65; postretirement mortality using the RP-2014 gender specific tables, adjusted for BHE credibility weighted experience, translated to 2011 using MP-2014. 2012 and 2013 rates were used for MP-2016 and MP-2017, respectively and generational mortality improvements from 2013 forward were based on the custom RPEC 2017 model; a lump sum interest rate of 3.60%; and lump sum mortality using the gender specific tables set forth in IRC 417(e)(3) for the upcoming fiscal year with mortality improvements determined using MP-2016.
Historically, PacifiCorp has adopted the Retirement Plan calculations of the present value of accumulated benefits, the following assumptions were used: 60% lump sum payment; 40% joint and 100% survivor annuity if participant is married and 40% single life annuity if participant is single. The present value assumptions used in calculating the present value of accumulated benefits for the Retirement Plan were as follows: a discount rate of 5.55%; an expected retirement age of 65; cash balance interest crediting assumption of 5.43% for 2023 and 2024, and 2.60% thereafter; postretirement mortality using the Pri-2012 gender specific tables; generational mortality improvements from 2012 forward based on MP-2021; and the applicable lump sum interest and mortality rates set forth in IRC 417(e)(3) for the upcoming fiscal year.
Historically, the majority of itsPacifiCorp's employees were entitled to participate in PacifiCorp's Retirement Plan, other than employees subject to collective bargaining agreements that do not provide for coverage under the Retirement Plan. Through May 31, 2007, participants earned benefits at retirement payable for life based on length of service through May 31, 2007 and average pay in the 60 consecutive months of highest pay out of the 120 months prior to May 31, 2007. Pay for this purpose included base salary and annual incentive plan payments up to 10% of base salary, but was limited to the amounts specified in Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a)(17). Benefits were based on 1.3% of final average pay plus 0.65% of final average pay in excess of covered compensation (as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 401(1)(5)(E)) multiplied by years of service.


The Retirement Plan was restatedamended effective June 1, 2007 to change from a traditional final average pay formula as described above to a cash balance formula for non-union participants. Benefits under the final average pay formula were frozen as of May 31, 2007, and no future benefits will accrue under that formula for non-union participants. Under the cash balance formula, benefits are based on pay credits to each participant's account of 6.5% (5.0% for employees hired after June 30, 2006 and before January 1, 2008) of eligible compensation. In addition, through August 1, 2009, there was a pay credit of 4% of eligible compensation in excess of the Social Security Wage Base. Interest is also credited to each participant's account. Employees who were age 40 or older as of May 31, 2007 received certain additional transition pay credits for five years from the effective date of the Retirement Plan restatement.


Participants in the Retirement Plan are entitled to receive full benefits upon retirement on or after age 65. Such participants are also entitled to receive reduced benefits upon early retirement after age 55 with at least five years of service or when age plus years of service equals 75.


The Retirement Plan was closed to non-union employees hired after December 31, 2007 (which includes Mr. Hoogeveen, Mr. Fehrman and Mr. Thon). In 2008, non-union employee participants in the Retirement Plan were offered the option to continue to receive pay credits in the Retirement Plan or receive equivalent fixed contributions to the 401(k) Plan with any such election becoming effective January 1, 2009. Ms. Kobliha elected the equivalent fixed 401(k) contribution option and, therefore, no longer receives pay credits in the Retirement Plan. In 2017, the Retirement Plan was frozen for the remainder of the non-union employees who had participated (which includeincludes Mr. Bird and Ms. Crane)Bird) with pay credits equivalent to those received in the Retirement Plan allocated into the K Plus Employee Savings401(k) Plan. Each NEO continuesMr. Bird and Ms. Kobliha continue to receive interest credits in the Retirement Plan.





479


Nonqualified Deferred Compensation


The following table sets forth certain information regarding the nonqualified deferred compensation plan accounts held by each of PacifiCorp's NEOs as of December 31, 2017:2022:

ExecutiveRegistrantAggregateAggregateAggregate
contributionscontributionsearnings/(losses)withdrawals/balance as of
Name
in 2022(1)(2)
in 2022in 2022distributions
12/31/2022(3)
Scott W. Thon$— $— $— $— $— 
William J. Fehrman— — — — — 
Stefan A. Bird— — — — — 
Gary W. Hoogeveen330,330 — (589,981)— 3,607,102 
Nikki L. Kobliha333,707 — (65,034)— 805,545 

  Executive Registrant Aggregate Aggregate Aggregate
  contributions contributions earnings withdrawals/ balance as of
Name 
in 2017 (1)
 in 2017 in 2017 distributions 
December 31, 2017 (2)
           
Gregory E. Abel $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Stefan A. Bird 
 
 
 
 
Cindy A. Crane 825,744
 
 457,063
 (85,811) 3,781,797
Nikki L. Kobliha 
 
 
 
 
(1)The executive contribution amount shown for Mr. Hoogeveen represents a deferral of $330,330 of his 2019 LTIP award which was deferred in 2022. $74,389 of the deferred 2019 LTIP award is included in the 2022 total compensation reported for him in the Summary Compensation Table and is not additional compensation. The remaining LTIP award was earned prior to 2022.

(2)The executive contribution amount shown for Ms. Kobliha represents a deferral of $140,093 of her 2022 compensation and a deferral of $193,614 of her 2019 LTIP award which was deferred in 2022. $12,895 of the deferred 2019 LTIP award is included in the 2022 total compensation reported for her in the Summary Compensation Table and is not additional compensation. The remaining LTIP award was earned prior to 2022.
(1)The executive contribution amount shown for Ms. Crane represents a deferral of $500,000 of her 2017 compensation and $325,744 of her 2013 LTIP award which was deferred in 2017. The $500,000 deferred compensation and $100,751 of the deferred LTIP award are included in the 2017 total compensation reported for her in the Summary Compensation Table and are not additional compensation. The remaining 2013 LTIP award was earned prior to 2017.
(2)The aggregate balance as of December 31, 2017 shown for Ms. Crane includes $67,107 of compensation previously reported in 2016 in the Summary Compensation Table, and $35,397 of compensation previously reported in 2015 in the Summary Compensation Table.
(3)The aggregate balance as of December 31, 2022, shown for Mr. Hoogeveen and Ms. Kobliha includes $567,702 and $136,703, respectively, of compensation previously reported in the Summary Compensation Table.
Eligibility for PacifiCorp's DCP is restricted to select management and highly compensated employees. The plan provides tax benefits to eligible participants by allowing them to defer compensation on a pretax basis, thus reducing their current taxable income. Deferrals and any investment returns grow on a tax-deferred basis, thus participants pay no income tax until they receive distributions. The DCP permits participants to make a voluntary deferral of up to 50% of base salary and 100% of short-term incentive compensation awards. All deferrals are net of social security taxes. Amounts deferred under the DCP receive a rate of return based on the returns of any combination of various investment alternatives offered by the plan and selected by the participant. Gains or losses are calculated daily, and returns are posted to accounts based on participants' fund allocation elections. Participants can change their fund allocations as of the end of any day on which the market is open.

The DCP allows participants to maintain three accounts based upon when they want to receive payments: retirement account, in-service account and education account. Both the retirement and in-service accounts can be distributed as lump sums or in up to 10 annual installments, except in the case of the four DCP transition accounts that allow for a grandfathered payout based on the previous deferred compensation plan distribution elections of lump sum, 5, 10 or 15 annual installments. Effective December 31, 2006, no new money may be deferred into the DCP transition accounts. The education account is distributed in four annual installments. If a participant leaves employment prior to retirement (age 55), all amounts in the participant's account will be paid out in a lump sum as soon as administratively practicable. Participants are 100% vested in their deferrals and any investment gains or losses recorded in their accounts.


Participants in PacifiCorp's LTIP also have the option of deferring all or a part of those awards after the four-year mandatory deferral and vesting period. The provisions governing the deferral of LTIP awards are similar to those described for the DCP above.



Potential Payments Upon Termination


PacifiCorp's NEOs other than the Chairman and CEO, are not generally entitled to severance or enhanced benefits upon termination of employment or change in control. Mr. Abel resignedNone of PacifiCorp's NEOs have an employment agreement; therefore, payments upon termination are determined by the applicable plan documents and our general employment policies and practices as PacifiCorp's Chairman and CEO on January 10, 2018 and received no severance or enhanced benefits in connection with his resignation.discussed below.


The following table sets forth the estimated increase in the present value of benefits pursuant to the termination scenarios indicated for PacifiCorp's NEOs, other than Mr. Abel.Thon. Payments or benefits that are not enhanced in form or amount upon the occurrence of a particular termination scenario, which include 401(k) and nonqualified deferred compensation account balances and those portions of long-term incentive payments that would have otherwise been paid, are not included herein. All estimated payments reflected in the table below assume termination on December 31, 20172022 and are payable as lump sums unless otherwise noted.

480


Termination Scenario 
Incentive (1)
 
Pension (2)
Termination Scenario
Incentive (1)
Pension (2)
    
Stefan A. Bird:    Stefan A. Bird:
Retirement, Voluntary and Involuntary With or Without Cause 
 49,531
Retirement, Voluntary and Involuntary With or Without Cause$— $43,590 
Death and Disability 896,780
 49,531
Death and Disability944,233 43,950 
Cindy A. Crane(3):
    
Involuntary With Cause 
 30,536
Retirement, Voluntary and Involuntary Without Cause, Death and Disability 974,072
 30,536
Gary W. Hoogeveen:Gary W. Hoogeveen:
Retirement, Voluntary and Involuntary With or Without CauseRetirement, Voluntary and Involuntary With or Without Cause— n/a
Death and DisabilityDeath and Disability838,153 n/a
Nikki L. Kobliha:    Nikki L. Kobliha:
Retirement, Voluntary and Involuntary With or Without Cause 
 1,282
Retirement, Voluntary and Involuntary With or Without Cause— — 
Death and Disability 96,990
 1,282
Death and Disability228,678 — 


(1)Amounts represent the unvested portion of each NEO's LTIP account, which becomes 100% vested under certain circumstances.
(2)Pension values represent the excess of the present value of benefits payable under each termination scenario over the amount already reflected in the Pension Benefits table.
(3)Ms. Crane has already met the retirement criteria, therefore her termination and death scenarios under the Retirement Plan are based on assuming 60% paid as a lump sum and 40% paid as a 100% joint and survivor annuity.

(1)Amounts represent the unvested portion of each NEO's LTIP account, which becomes 100% vested under certain circumstances.
(2)Pension values represent the excess of the present value of benefits payable under each termination scenario over the amount already reflected in the Pension Benefits table.
Chief Executive Officer Pay Ratio


PacifiCorp’sPacifiCorp's CEO receives no direct compensation from PacifiCorp, and no amounts are reported for the CEO in the Summary Compensation Table. Accordingly, PacifiCorp has determined that the CEO pay ratio is not calculable.


Director Compensation


PacifiCorp's directors do not receive additional compensation for service as directors of PacifiCorp. Compensation information for Messrs. Abel,Thon, Fehrman, Bird, Ms. Crane,Hoogeveen, and Ms. Kobliha for their services as executive officers of PacifiCorp is described above.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation


As of December 31, 2017, Mr. Abel wasThon is PacifiCorp's ChairmanChair and CEO and also the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of BHE. On January 10, 2018, Mr. Fehrman became PacifiCorp's Chairman and CEO and also the President and Chief Executive Officer of BHE.CEO. None of PacifiCorp's executive officers serves as a member of the compensation committee of any company that has an executive officer serving as a member of PacifiCorp's Board of Directors. None of PacifiCorp's executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors of any company (other than BHE) that has an executive officer serving as a member of PacifiCorp's compensation committee. See also PacifiCorp's Item 13 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



481


Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY, MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, MIDAMERICAN ENERGY, NEVADA POWER, AND SIERRA PACIFIC, EASTERN ENERGY GAS AND EGTS


Information required by Item 12 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) to Form 10-K.


PACIFICORP


Beneficial Ownership


PacifiCorp is a consolidated subsidiary of BHE. PacifiCorp's common stock is indirectly owned by BHE, 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 500, Des Moines, Iowa 50309-2580. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway that, as of February 16, 2018,January 31, 2023, owns 90.2%92% of BHE's common stock. The balance of BHE's common stock is beneficially owned by Walter Scott, Jr. (along with his family members and related or affiliated entities)entities of the late Mr. Walter Scott, Jr., a former member of BHE's Board of Directors, and Gregory E. Abel, BHE's Executive Chairman.Directors.


None of PacifiCorp's executive officers or directors owns shares of its preferred stock. The following table sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of BHE's common stock and the Class A and Class B shares of Berkshire Hathaway common stock held by each of PacifiCorp's directors, executive officers and all of its directors and executive officers as a group as of February 16, 2018:January 31, 2023:

BHEBerkshire Hathaway
Common StockClass A Common StockClass B Common Stock
Beneficial Owner
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)
Percentage of Class(1)
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)
Percentage of Class(1)
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)
Percentage of Class(1)
Scott W. Thon— — — — 1,042 *
Stefan A. Bird— — — — — — 
Calvin D. Haack— — — — — — 
Natalie L. Hocken— — — — — — 
Nikki L. Kobliha— — — — — — 
Gary W. Hoogeveen— — — — 521 *
All executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons)— — — — 1,563 *

  BHE Berkshire Hathaway
  Common Stock Class A Common Stock Class B Common Stock
Beneficial Owner 
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)
 
Percentage of Class(1)
 
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)
 
Percentage of Class(1)
 
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned(1)
 
Percentage of Class(1)
             
William J. Fehrman 
 
 
 
 20
 *
Stefan A. Bird 
 
 
 
 
 
Cindy A. Crane 
 
 
 
 
 
Patrick J. Goodman 
 
 5
 *
 786
 *
Natalie L. Hocken 
 
 
 
 
 
Nikki L. Kobliha 
 
 
 
 
 
All executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons) 
 
 5
 *
 806
 *

*    Indicates beneficial ownership of less than one percent of all outstanding shares.
(1)Includes shares of which the listed beneficial owner is deemed to have the right to acquire beneficial ownership under Rule 13d-3(d) under the Securities Exchange Act, including, among other things, shares which the listed beneficial owner has the right to acquire within 60 days.


Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

(1)Includes shares of which the listed beneficial owner is deemed to have the right to acquire beneficial ownership under Rule 13d-3(d) under the Securities Exchange Act, including, among other things, shares which the listed beneficial owner has the right to acquire within 60 days.

482


Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY, MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, MIDAMERICAN ENERGY, NEVADA POWER, AND SIERRA PACIFIC, EASTERN ENERGY GAS AND EGTS


Information required by Item 13 is omitted pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) to Form 10-K.


PACIFICORP


Certain Relationships and Related Transactions


The Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and the BHE Code of Business Conduct, or the Codes, which apply to all of PacifiCorp's directors, officers and employees and those of its subsidiaries, generally govern the review, approval or ratification of any related-person transaction. A related-person transaction is one in which PacifiCorp or any of its subsidiaries participate and in which one or more of PacifiCorp's directors, executive officers, holders of more than five percent of its voting securities or any of such persons' immediate family members have a direct or indirect material interest.


Under the Codes, all of PacifiCorp's directors and executive officers (including those of its subsidiaries) must disclose to PacifiCorp's legal department any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict with its interests. No action may be taken with respect to such transaction or relationship until approved by the legal department. For PacifiCorp's chief executive officer and chief financial officer, prior approval for any such transaction or relationship must be given by Berkshire Hathaway's audit committee. In addition, prior legal department approval must be obtained before a director or executive officer can accept employment, offices or board positions in other for-profit businesses, or engage in his or her own business that raises a potential conflict or appearance of conflict with PacifiCorp's interests.


Under an intercompany administrative services agreement PacifiCorp has entered into with BHE and its other subsidiaries, the costs of certain administrative services provided by BHE to PacifiCorp or by PacifiCorp to BHE, or shared with BHE and other subsidiaries, are directly charged or allocated to the entity receiving such services. This agreement has been filed with the regulatory commissions in the states where PacifiCorp serves retail customers. PacifiCorp also provides an annual report of all transactions with its affiliates to its state regulatory commissions, who have the authority to refuse recovery in rates for payments PacifiCorp makes to its affiliates deemed to have the effect of subsidizing the separate business activities of BHE or its other subsidiaries.


Refer to Note 1821 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of PacifiCorp in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding related-partyrelated party transactions.


Director Independence


Because PacifiCorp's common stock is indirectly, wholly owned by BHE and its Board of Directors consists of BHE and PacifiCorp employees, PacifiCorp is not required to have independent directors or audit, nominating or compensation committees consisting of independent directors.


Based on the standards of the New York Stock Exchange LLC, on which the common stock of PacifiCorp's ultimate parent company, Berkshire Hathaway, is listed, PacifiCorp's Board of Directors has determined that none of its directors are considered independent because of their employment by BHE or PacifiCorp.



483
Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services



Item 14.Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table shows the fees paid or accrued by each Registrant for audit and audit-related services and fees paid for tax and all other services rendered by Deloitte & Touche LLP (PCAOB ID No. 34), the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, and their respective affiliates (collectively, the "Deloitte Entities") for each of the last two years (in millions):

BerkshireEastern
HathawayMidAmericanMidAmericanNevadaSierraEnergy
Energy(1)
PacifiCorp
Funding(1)
EnergyPowerPacific
Gas(1)
EGTS
2022
Audit fees(2)
$12.6 $1.7 $1.3 $1.2 $1.0 $0.9 $1.7 $1.3 
Audit-related fees(3)
0.8 — — — — — 0.2 0.1 
Tax fees(4)
— — — — — — — — 
Other0.6 — — — — — — — 
Total$14.0 $1.7 $1.3 $1.2 $1.0 $0.9 $1.9 $1.4 
2021
Audit fees(2)
$11.3 $1.7 $1.3 $1.2 $0.9 $0.9 $1.2 $— 
Audit-related fees(3)
0.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 — — 0.2 — 
Tax fees(4)
0.1 — — — — — — — 
Total$12.2 $1.8 $1.4 $1.3 $0.9 $0.9 $1.4 $— 

 Berkshire          
 Hathaway   MidAmerican MidAmerican Nevada Sierra
 Energy PacifiCorp Funding Energy Power Pacific
2017           
Audit fees(1)
$9.3
 $1.5
 $1.2
 $1.1
 $0.9
 $0.9
Audit-related fees(2)
0.8
 0.2
 0.2
 0.2
 
 
Tax fees(3)
0.1
 
 
 
 
 
Total$10.2
 $1.7
 $1.4
 $1.3
 $0.9
 $0.9
            
2016           
Audit fees(1)
$9.1
 $1.5
 $1.2
 $1.1
 $0.9
 $1.1
Audit-related fees(2)
0.8
 0.2
 0.2
 0.2
 
 
Tax fees(3)
0.1
 
 
 
 
 
Total$10.0
 $1.7
 $1.4
 $1.3
 $0.9
 $1.1
(1)The reported fees for Berkshire Hathaway Energy include those fees reported for PacifiCorp, MidAmerican Funding, Nevada Power, Sierra Pacific and Eastern Energy Gas while the reported fees for MidAmerican Funding include those fees reported for MidAmerican Energy and the reported fees for Eastern Energy Gas include those fees reported for EGTS, which became an SEC registrant on July 28, 2022.

(2)Audit fees include fees for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and interim reviews of the quarterly financial statements for each Registrant, audit services provided in connection with required statutory audits of certain of BHE's subsidiaries and comfort letters, consents and other services related to SEC matters for each Registrant.
(1)Audit fees include fees for the audit of the consolidated financial statements and interim reviews of the quarterly financial statements for each Registrant, audit services provided in connection with required statutory audits of certain of BHE's subsidiaries and comfort letters, consents and other services related to SEC matters for each Registrant.
(2)Audit-related fees primarily include fees for assurance and related services for any other statutory or regulatory requirements, audits of certain employee benefit plans and consultations on various accounting and reporting matters.
(3)Tax fees include fees for services relating to tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, tax return preparation and tax audits.

(3)Audit-related fees primarily include fees for assurance and related services for any other statutory or regulatory requirements, audits of certain employee benefit plans and consultations on various accounting and reporting matters.
(4)Tax fees include fees for services relating to tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and international tax compliance, tax return preparation and tax audits.

The audit committee has considered whether the non-audit services provided to the Registrants by the Deloitte Entities impaired the independence of the Deloitte Entities and concluded that they did not. All of the services performed by the Deloitte Entities were pre-approved in accordance with the pre-approval policy adopted by the audit committee. The policy provides guidelines for the audit, audit-related, tax and other non-audit services that may be provided by the Deloitte Entities to the Registrants. The policy (a) identifies the guiding principles that must be considered by the audit committee in approving services to ensure that the Deloitte Entities' independence is not impaired; (b) describes the audit, audit-related and tax services that may be provided and the non-audit services that are prohibited; and (c) sets forth pre-approval requirements for all permitted services. Under the policy, requests to provide services that require specific approval by the audit committee will be submitted to the audit committee by both the Registrants' independent auditor and BHE's Chief Financial Officer. All requests for services to be provided by the independent auditor that do not require specific approval by the audit committee will be submitted to BHE's Chief Financial Officer and must include a detailed description of the services to be rendered. BHE's Chief Financial Officer will determine whether such services are included within the list of services that have received the general pre-approval of the audit committee. The audit committee will be informed on a timely basis of any such services rendered by the independent auditor.

484


PART IV


Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

Item 15.Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)Financial Statements and Schedules
(1)Financial Statements
The financial statements of all Registrants are included in their respective Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
(2)Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are either not applicable, not required or the information required to be set forth therein is included on the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto.
(3)
(b)Exhibits

Item 16.Form 10-K Summary
(a)Financial Statements and Schedules 
      
 (1)Financial Statements 
      
  The financial statements of all Registrants are included in their respective Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
   
      
 (2)Financial Statement Schedules 
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
      
  Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are either not applicable, not required or the information required to be set forth therein is included on the Consolidated Financial Statements or notes thereto. 
      
 (3)
   
      
(b)Exhibits
      
 
      
(c)Financial statements required by Regulation S-X, which are excluded from the Annual Report by Rule 14a-3(b). 
      
 


Item 16.Form 10-K Summary


None.



485


Schedule I

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY
Berkshire Hathaway Energy CompanyPARENT COMPANY ONLY
Parent Company Only
Condensed Balance Sheets
As of December 31,CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)
As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$32 $18 
Accounts receivable— 
Accounts receivable - affiliate263 117 
Notes receivable - affiliate10 189 
Income tax receivable28 23 
Other current assets12 13 
Total current assets349 360 
Investments in subsidiaries59,944 58,190 
Other investments205 237 
Goodwill1,221 1,221 
Other assets1,152 1,101 
Total assets$62,871 $61,109 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and other current liabilities$429 $397 
Notes payable - affiliate287 353 
Short-term debt245 — 
Current portion of BHE senior debt900 — 
Total current liabilities1,861 750 
BHE senior debt13,096 13,003 
BHE junior subordinated debentures100 100 
Notes payable - affiliate477 
Other long-term liabilities505 560 
Total liabilities16,039 14,415 
Equity:
BHE shareholders' equity:
Preferred stock - 100 shares authorized, $0.01 par value, 1 and 2 shares issued and outstanding850 1,650 
Common stock - 115 shares authorized, no par value, 76 shares issued and outstanding— — 
Additional paid-in capital6,298 6,374 
Long-term income tax receivable— (744)
Retained earnings41,833 40,754 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(2,149)(1,340)
Total BHE shareholders' equity46,832 46,694 
Noncontrolling interest— — 
Total equity46,832 46,694 
Total liabilities and equity$62,871 $61,109 
 2017 2016
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$346
 $33
Accounts receivable
 21
Accounts receivable - affiliate60
 
Notes receivable - affiliate391
 105
Other current assets21
 2
Total current assets818
 161
    
Investments in subsidiaries34,019
 33,400
Other investments2,117
 1,338
Goodwill1,221
 1,221
Other assets1,155
 1,171
    
Total assets$39,330
 $37,291
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable and other current liabilities$268
 $357
Notes payable - affiliate182
 194
Short-term debt3,331
 834
Current portion of BHE senior debt1,000
 400
Total current liabilities4,781
 1,785
    
BHE senior debt5,452
 7,418
BHE junior subordinated debentures100
 944
Notes payable - affiliate1
 1,859
Other long-term liabilities800
 942
Total liabilities11,134
 12,948
    
Equity:   
BHE shareholders' equity:   
Common stock - 115 shares authorized, no par value, 77 shares issued and outstanding
 
Additional paid-in capital6,368
 6,390
Retained earnings22,206
 19,448
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net(398) (1,511)
Total BHE shareholders' equity28,176
 24,327
Noncontrolling interest20
 16
Total equity28,196
 24,343
    
Total liabilities and equity$39,330
 $37,291

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.

Schedule I
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company    
Parent Company Only (continued)
Condensed Statements of Operations
For the years ended December 31,
(Amounts in millions)

 2017 2016 2015
      
Operating costs and expenses:     
General and administration$55
 $51
 $58
Depreciation and amortization4
 4
 3
Total operating costs and expenses59
 55
 61
      
Operating loss(59) (55) (61)
      
Other income (expense):     
Interest expense(475) (527) (556)
Other, net(369) 37
 14
Total other income (expense)(844) (490) (542)
      
Loss before income tax benefit and equity income(903) (545) (603)
Income tax benefit(335) (285) (330)
Equity income3,441
 2,805
 2,646
Net income2,873
 2,545
 2,373
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest3
 3
 3
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders$2,870
 $2,542
 $2,370


The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.

486

396



Schedule I
Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company    BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY
Parent Company Only (continued)PARENT COMPANY ONLY
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31,CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Operating expenses:
General and administration$31 $83 $57 
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating expenses39 89 61 
Operating loss(39)(89)(61)
Other income (expense):
Interest expense(629)(580)(527)
Other, net(45)1,846 4,789 
Total other income (expense)(674)1,266 4,262 
(Loss) income before income tax (benefit) expense and equity income(713)1,177 4,201 
Income tax (benefit) expense(259)194 1,089 
Equity income3,175 4,807 3,832 
Net income2,721 5,790 6,944 
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest— — 
Net income attributable to BHE shareholders2,721 5,790 6,943 
Preferred dividends46 121 26 
Earnings on common shares$2,675 $5,669 $6,917 
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net income$2,873
 $2,545
 $2,373
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax1,113
 (603) (414)
Comprehensive income3,986
 1,942
 1,959
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests3
 3
 3
Comprehensive income attributable to BHE shareholders$3,983
 $1,939
 $1,956


The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.



487



Schedule I
Berkshire Hathaway Energy CompanyBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY
Parent Company Only (continued)PARENT COMPANY ONLY
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the years ended December 31,CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net income$2,721 $5,790 $6,944 
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax(809)212 154 
Comprehensive income1,912 6,002 7,098 
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests— — 
Comprehensive income attributable to BHE shareholders$1,912 $6,002 $7,097 
 2017 2016 2015
      
Cash flows from operating activities$2,450
 $2,760
 $2,528
      
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Investments in subsidiaries(1,566) (1,080) (1,506)
Purchases of investments(71) (24) (36)
Proceeds from sale of investments68
 20
 47
Notes receivable from affiliate, net(305) (307) 19
Other, net(8) (5) (7)
Net cash flows from investing activities(1,882) (1,396) (1,483)
      
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Repayments of BHE senior debt(1,379) 
 
Repayments of BHE subordinated debt(944) (2,000) (850)
Common stock purchases(19) 
 (36)
Net proceeds from (repayments of) short-term debt2,498
 581
 (142)
Tender offer premium paid(406) 
 
Notes payable to affiliate, net
 69
 4
Other, net(5) (4) (1)
Net cash flows from financing activities(255) (1,354) (1,025)
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents313
 10
 20
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year33
 23
 3
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$346
 $33
 $23


The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.





488
398



Schedule I
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Cash flows from operating activities$1,252 $1,819 $1,639 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investments in subsidiaries(1,085)(1,206)(6,422)
Purchases of marketable securities(20)(29)(55)
Proceeds from sales of marketable securities11 28 22 
Purchases of other investments— — (1,290)
Proceeds from other investments— 1,290 — 
Notes receivable from affiliate, net390 200 (121)
Other, net(44)(20)(20)
Net cash flows from investing activities(748)263 (7,886)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock— — 3,750 
Preferred stock redemptions(800)(2,100)— 
Preferred dividends(50)(132)(7)
Common stock purchases(870)— (126)
Proceeds from BHE senior debt986 — 5,212 
Repayments of BHE senior debt— (450)(350)
Net proceeds from (repayments of) short-term debt245 — (1,590)
Other, net(1)(5)(32)
Net cash flows from financing activities(490)(2,687)6,857 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents14 (605)610 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year18 623 13 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$32 $18 $623 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.


489


Schedule I
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Basis of Presentation - The condensed financial information of BHE investments in subsidiaries are presented under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, the assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are not consolidated. The investments in subsidiaries are recorded in the Condensed Balance Sheets. The income from operations of subsidiaries is reported on a net basis as equity income in the Condensed Statements of Operations.


Other investments - BHE's investment in BYD Company Limited ("BYD") common stock is accounted for as an available-for-sale security with changes in fair value recognized in AOCI. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the fair value of BHE's investment in BYD common stock was $1,961 million and $1,185 million, respectively, which resulted in an unrealized gain of $1,729 million and $953 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Dividends and distributions from subsidiaries - Cash dividends paid to BHE by its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 were $3.0$1.9 billion, for each of the three years. $2.4 billion and $2.0 billion, respectively. In January and February 2018,2023, BHE received cash dividends from its subsidiaries totaling $158 million.$495 million.


Guarantees and commitments - BHE has issued guarantees up to a maximumand letters of $236 millioncredit in supportrespect of various obligations of consolidated subsidiaries, equity method investments and commitments, subject to satisfaction of certain specified conditions, to provide equity contributions in support of renewable tax equity investments totaling $265 million.other related parties aggregating $1.6 billion and commitments.


See the notes to the consolidated BHE financial statements in Part II, Item 8 for other disclosures regarding long-term obligations (Notes 8, 9, 10 and 10)11) and shareholders' equity (Note 17)18).


Schedule II
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
(Amounts in millions)


490
  Column B Column C  Column E
  Balance at Charged     Balance
Column A Beginning to Acquisition Column D at End
Description of Year Income Reserves Deductions of Year
           
Reserves Deducted From Assets To Which They Apply:          
           
Reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable:          
Year ended 2017 $33
 $42
 $
 $(35) $40
Year ended 2016 31
 39
 
 (37) 33
Year ended 2015 37
 33
 
 (39) 31
           
Reserves Not Deducted From Assets(1):
          
Year ended 2017 $13
 $7
 $
 $(7) $13
Year ended 2016 13
 5
 
 (5) 13
Year ended 2015 11
 7
 
 (5) 13



The notes to the consolidated BHE financial statements are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.

(1)Reserves not deducted from assets relate primarily to estimated liabilities for losses retained by BHE for workers compensation, public liability and property damage claims.


Schedule I

MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)

As of December 31,
20222021
ASSETS
Current assets:
Receivables from affiliates$$
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries10,959 10,070 
Total assets$10,960 $10,071 
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Interest accrued and other current liabilities$$
Payable to affiliate36 25 
Long-term debt240 240 
Total liabilities281 270 
Member's equity:
Paid-in capital1,679 1,679 
Retained earnings9,000 8,122 
Total member's equity10,679 9,801 
Total liabilities and member's equity$10,960 $10,071 
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Receivables from affiliates$2
 $2
Income tax receivable13
 
Total current assets15
 2
    
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries7,322
 6,718
    
Total assets$7,337
 $6,720
    
LIABILITIES AND MEMBER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Interest accrued and other current liabilities$6
 $7
    
Payable to affiliate431
 301
Long-term debt240
 326
Total liabilities677
 634
    
Member's equity:   
Paid-in capital1,679
 1,679
Retained earnings4,981
 4,407
Total member's equity6,660
 6,086
    
Total liabilities and member's equity$7,337
 $6,720


The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.

491


Schedule I

MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Other income (expense):
Interest expense$(17)$(16)$(16)
Loss before income taxes(17)(16)(16)
Income tax benefit(5)(5)(5)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries959 894 829 
Net income$947 $883 $818 
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Other income and (expense):     
Interest expense$(22) $(22) $(22)
Other, net(30) 
 
Loss before income taxes(52) (22) (22)
Income tax benefit(22) (9) (8)
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries604
 545
 472
Net income$574
 $532
 $458


The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.






MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net income$574
 $532
 $458
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 3
 (7)
      
Comprehensive income$574
 $535
 $451

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.



Schedule I


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)

Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
Net cash flows from operating activities$(12)$(12)$(12)
Net cash flows from investing activities:
Dividend from subsidiary69 — — 
Net cash flows from investing activities69 — — 
Net cash flows from financing activities:
Distribution to member(69)— — 
Net change in amounts payable to subsidiary12 12 12 
Net cash flows from financing activities(57)12 12 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents— — — 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year— — — 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$— $— $— 

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net cash flows from operating activities$(15) $(13) $(13)
      
Net cash flows from investing activities
 
 
      
Net cash flows from financing activities:     
Repayment of long-term debt(86) 
 
Tender offer premium paid(29) 
 
Net change in amounts payable to subsidiary130
 13
 13
Net cash flows from financing activities15
 13
 13
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$
 $
 $


The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.

492


Schedule I

MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Incorporated by reference are MidAmerican Funding, LLC and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Changes in Member's Equity for the three years ended December 31, 20172022, 2021 and 2020 in Part II, Item 8.


Basis of Presentation - The condensed financial information of MidAmerican Funding, LLC's ("MidAmerican Funding's") investments in subsidiaries is presented under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, the assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are not consolidated. The investments in and advances to subsidiaries are recorded on the Condensed Balance Sheets. The income from operations of the subsidiaries is reported on a net basis as equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary companies on the Condensed Statements of Operations. The Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income have been omitted as net income equals comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020.


Income Taxes - MidAmerican Funding is not subject to income tax and is disregarded by the taxing authorities. However, a portion of Berkshire Hathaway Inc.'s consolidated income tax expense has been allocated to MidAmerican Funding for presentation in its separate financial statements commensurate with computing MidAmerican Funding's provision on a stand-alone basis.

Payable to Affiliate - MHC, Inc. ("MHC") settles all obligations of MidAmerican Funding including primarily interest costs on, and repayments of, MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt. Net amountsdebt, income taxes and distributions to parent. MHC paid by MHC$81 million,$12 million and $12 million in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, on behalf of MidAmerican Funding.

Distribution to Parent - In 2022, MidAmerican Funding totaled $130 million, $13 milliondeclared and $13 million for the years 2017, 2016paid, via MHC, a cash dividend of $69 million. In January 2023, MidAmerican Funding declared and 2015, respectively.paid, via MHC, a cash dividend of $100 million.


See the notes to the consolidated MidAmerican Funding financial statements in Part II, Item 8 for other disclosures.




Schedule I

MHC INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)


493
 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $1
Receivables from affiliates2
 1
    
Receivable from parent431
 301
Investments and nonregulated property, net14
 12
Goodwill1,270
 1,270
Investments in and advances to subsidiaries5,783
 5,181
    
Total assets$7,500
 $6,766
    
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Payables to affiliates$175
 $44
    
Deferred income taxes3
 4
Total liabilities178
 48
    
Shareholder's equity:   
Paid-in capital2,430
 2,430
Retained earnings4,892
 4,288
Total shareholder's equity7,322
 6,718
    
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$7,500
 $6,766

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.

Schedule I

MHC INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)



 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Other income$1
 $1
 $1
Income before income taxes1
 1
 1
Equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiaries603
 544
 471
Net income$604
 $545
 $472
EXHIBIT INDEX

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.




MHC INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net income$604
 $545
 $472
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 3
 (7)
      
Comprehensive income$604
 $548
 $465

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.


Schedule I

MHC INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net cash flows from operating activities$(1) $1
 $1
      
Net cash flows from investing activities:     
Dividend from subsidiary
 
 16
Capital expenditures(2) (1) 
Net change in amounts receivable from parent(130) (13) (13)
Other
 
 (1)
Net cash flows from investing activities(132) (14) 2
      
Net cash flows from financing activities:     
Net change in amounts payable to subsidiaries(1) 5
 (7)
Net change in note payable to Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company133
 9
 3
Net cash flows from financing activities132
 14
 (4)
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents(1) 1
 (1)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year1
 
 1
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$
 $1
 $

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this financial statement schedule.

Schedule I

MHC INC.
PARENT COMPANY ONLY
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Incorporated by reference are MHC Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the three years ended December 31, 2017, in Part IV, Item 15(c).

Basis of Presentation - The condensed financial information of MHC Inc.'s ("MHC's") investments in subsidiaries is presented under the equity method of accounting. Under this method, the assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are not consolidated. The investments in and advances to subsidiaries are recorded on the Condensed Balance Sheets. The income from operations of the subsidiaries is reported on a net basis as equity in undistributed earnings of subsidiary companies on the Condensed Statements of Operations.

Receivable from Parent - MHC settles all obligations of MidAmerican Funding, LLC ("MidAmerican Funding") including primarily interest costs on, and repayments of, MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt. Net amounts paid by MHC on behalf of MidAmerican Funding totaled $130 million, $13 million and $13 million for the years 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Note Payable to Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company - On January 1, 2016, MidAmerican Energy Company transferred the assets and liabilities of its unregulated retail services business to a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE"). The transfer repaid $117 million of MHC's note payable to BHE. See Note 3 of MidAmerican Energy Company's Notes to Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 for further discussion of the transfer.

See the notes to the consolidated MHC financial statements in Part IV, Item 15(c) for other disclosures.


Schedule II

MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
(Amounts in millions)

  Column B Column C   Column E
  Balance at Additions   Balance
Column A Beginning Charged Column D at End
Description of Year to Income Deductions of Year
         
Reserves Deducted From Assets To Which They Apply:        
Reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable:        
         
Year ended 2017 $7
 $8
 $(8) $7
         
Year ended 2016 $6
 $7
 $(6) $7
         
Year ended 2015 $7
 $7
 $(8) $6
         
         
Reserves Not Deducted From Assets(1):
        
         
Year ended 2017 $13
 $7
 $(7) $13
         
Year ended 2016 $13
 $5
 $(5) $13
         
Year ended 2015 $11
 $7
 $(5) $13
(1)Exhibit No.Reserves not deducted from assets include estimated liabilities for losses retained by MidAmerican Energy for workers compensation, public liability and property damage claims.


Schedule II

MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
MHC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017
(Amounts in millions)

  Column B Column C   Column E
  Balance at Additions   Balance
Column A Beginning Charged Column D at End
Description of Year to Income Deductions of Year
         
Reserves Deducted From Assets To Which They Apply:        
Reserve for uncollectible accounts receivable:        
         
Year ended 2017 $7
 $8
 $(8) $7
         
Year ended 2016 $6
 $7
 $(6) $7
         
Year ended 2015 $7
 $7
 $(8) $6
         
         
Reserves Not Deducted From Assets (1):
        
         
Year ended 2017 $13
 $7
 $(7) $13
         
Year ended 2016 $13
 $5
 $(5) $13
         
Year ended 2015 $11
 $7
 $(5) $13
(1)Reserves not deducted from assets include primarily estimated liabilities for losses retained by MidAmerican Funding and MHC for workers compensation, public liability and property damage claims.


The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of MHC Inc., the direct wholly owned subsidiary of MidAmerican Funding, are being provided pursuant to Rule 3-16 of the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation S-X. The purpose of these financial statements is to provide information about the assets and equity interests that collateralize MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt and that, upon the occurrence of any triggering event under the collateral agreement, would be available to satisfy the applicable debt obligations.



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
MHC Inc.
Des Moines, Iowa

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MHC Inc. and subsidiaries ("MHC") as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(ii) (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MHC as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of MHC's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on MHC's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to MHC in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB and in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. MHC is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of MHC’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Des Moines, Iowa
February 23, 2018

We have served as MHC's auditor since 1999.


MHC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts in millions)

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
    
ASSETS
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents$172
 $15
Receivables, net346
 284
Income taxes receivable51
 9
Inventories245
 264
Other current assets135
 35
Total current assets949
 607
    
Property, plant and equipment, net14,221
 12,835
Goodwill1,270
 1,270
Regulatory assets204
 1,161
Investments and restricted cash and investments730
 655
Receivable from affiliate431
 301
Other assets233
 216
    
Total assets$18,038
 $17,045

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

MHC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
(Amounts in millions)

 As of December 31,
 2017 2016
    
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Current liabilities:   
Accounts payable$451
 $302
Accrued interest48
 45
Accrued property, income and other taxes133
 138
Note payable to affiliate164
 31
Short-term debt
 99
Current portion of long-term debt350
 250
Other current liabilities128
 159
Total current liabilities1,274
 1,024
    
Long-term debt4,692
 4,051
Deferred income taxes2,235
 3,568
Regulatory liabilities1,661
 883
Asset retirement obligations528
 510
Other long-term liabilities326
 291
Total liabilities10,716
 10,327
    
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)   
    
Shareholder's equity:   
Common stock - no par value, 1,000 shares authorized, 1,000 shares issued and outstanding
 
Additional paid-in capital2,430
 2,430
Retained earnings4,892
 4,288
Total shareholder's equity7,322
 6,718
    
Total liabilities and shareholder's equity$18,038
 $17,045

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


MHC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts in millions)

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:     
Regulated electric$2,108
 $1,985
 $1,837
Regulated gas and other738
 646
 678
Total operating revenue2,846
 2,631
 2,515
      
Operating costs and expenses:     
Cost of fuel, energy and capacity434
 410
 433
Cost of gas sold and other447
 371
 407
Operations and maintenance784
 693
 707
Depreciation and amortization500
 479
 407
Property and other taxes119
 112
 110
Total operating costs and expenses2,284
 2,065
 2,064
      
Operating income562
 566
 451
      
Other income and (expense):     
Interest expense(215) (196) (184)
Allowance for borrowed funds15
 8
 8
Allowance for equity funds41
 19
 20
Other, net21
 18
 20
Total other income and (expense)(138) (151) (136)
      
Income before income tax benefit424
 415
 315
Income tax benefit(180) (130) (141)
      
Income from continuing operations604
 545
 456
      
Discontinued operations (Note 3):     
Income from discontinued operations
 
 22
Income tax expense
 
 6
Income on discontinued operations
 
 16
      
Net income$604
 $545
 $472

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


MHC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Amounts in millions)

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
      
Net income$604
 $545
 $472
      
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax of $-, $1 and $-
 3
 
Unrealized losses on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $-, $- and $(4)
 
 (7)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 3
 (7)
      
Comprehensive income$604
 $548
 $465

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


MHC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(Amounts in millions)

     Accumulated  
     Other  
 Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Total
 Capital Earnings Loss, Net Equity
        
Balance, December 31, 2014$2,430
 $3,272
 $(23) $5,679
Net income
 472
 
 472
Other comprehensive loss
 
 (7) (7)
Balance, December 31, 20152,430
 3,744
 (30) 6,144
Net income
 545
 
 545
Other comprehensive income
 
 3
 3
Transfer to affiliate (Note 3)
 
 27
 27
Other equity transactions
 (1) 
 (1)
Balance, December 31, 20162,430
 4,288
 
 6,718
Net income
 604
 
 604
Balance, December 31, 2017$2,430
 $4,892
 $
 $7,322

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


MHC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts in millions)

 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$604
 $545
 $472
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows from operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization500
 479
 407
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits334
 362
 276
Changes in other assets and liabilities37
 47
 49
Other, net(57) (92) (70)
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities:     
Receivables, net(61) (61) 93
Inventories19
 (27) (53)
Derivative collateral, net2
 5
 33
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net(11) (6) (8)
Accounts payable69
 39
 (76)
Accrued property, income and other taxes, net(42) 107
 213
Other current assets and liabilities1
 8
 12
Net cash flows from operating activities1,395
 1,406
 1,348
      
Net cash flows from investing activities:     
Utility construction expenditures(1,773) (1,636) (1,446)
Purchases of available-for-sale securities(143) (138) (142)
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale securities137
 158
 135
Proceeds from sales of other investments2
 2
 13
Net increase in restricted cash and investments(98) (10) 
Net change in amounts receivable from parent(130) (13) (13)
Other, net(2) 10
 2
Net cash flows from investing activities(2,007) (1,627) (1,451)
      
Net cash flows from financing activities:     
Proceeds from long-term debt990
 62
 649
Repayments of long-term debt(255) (38) (426)
Net change in amounts receivable from/payable to affiliates133
 9
 3
Net proceeds from (repayments of) short-term debt(99) 99
 (50)
Other, net
 1
 
Net cash flows from financing activities769
 133
 176
      
Net change in cash and cash equivalents157
 (88) 73
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year15
 103
 30
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$172
 $15
 $103

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


MHC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)
Company Organization

MHC Inc. ("MHC") is an Iowa corporation with MidAmerican Funding, LLC ("MidAmerican Funding") as its sole shareholder. MidAmerican Funding is an Iowa limited liability company with Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company ("BHE") as its sole member. BHE is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. ("Berkshire Hathaway"). MHC constitutes substantially all of MidAmerican Funding's assets, liabilities and business activities except those related to MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt securities. MHC conducts no business other than the ownership of its subsidiaries and related corporate services. MHC's principal subsidiary is MidAmerican Energy Company ("MidAmerican Energy"), a public utility with electric and natural gas operations. Direct wholly owned nonregulated subsidiaries of MHC are Midwest Capital Group, Inc. and MEC Construction Services Co.

(2)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

In addition to the following significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for significant accounting policies of MHC.

Basis ofConsolidation and Presentation

The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of MHC and its subsidiaries in which it held a controlling financial interest as of the date of the financial statement. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated, other than those between rate-regulated operations. MHC has evaluated subsequent events through February 23, 2018, which is the date the Consolidated Financial Statements were issued.

Goodwill

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of identifiable net assets acquired when MidAmerican Funding purchased MHC. MHC evaluates goodwill for impairment at least annually and completed its annual review as of October 31. When evaluating goodwill for impairment, MHC estimates the fair value of the reporting unit. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit, including goodwill, exceeds the estimated fair value, then the identifiable assets, including identifiable intangible assets, and liabilities of the reporting unit are estimated at fair value as of the current testing date. The excess of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit over the current estimated fair value of net assets establishes the implied value of goodwill. The excess of the recorded goodwill over the implied goodwill value is charged to earnings as an impairment loss. Significant judgment is required in estimating the fair value of the reporting unit and performing goodwill impairment tests. MHC uses a variety of methods to estimate a reporting unit's fair value, principally discounted projected future net cash flows. Key assumptions used include, but are not limited to, the use of estimated future cash flows; multiples of earnings and regulatory asset value; and an appropriate discount rate. In estimating future cash flows, MHC incorporates current market information, as well as historical factors. As such, the determination of fair value incorporates significant unobservable inputs. During 2017, 2016 and 2015, MHC did not record any goodwill impairments.

(3)Discontinued Operations

Refer to Note 3 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. The transfer of MidAmerican Energy's unregulated retail services business to a subsidiary of BHE repaid $117 million of MHC's note payable to BHE.

(4)    Property, Plant and Equipment, Net

Refer to Note 4 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. In addition to MidAmerican Energy's property, plant and equipment, net, MHC had gross nonregulated property of $24 million and $22 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related accumulated depreciation and amortization of $10 million and $9 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and construction work-in-progress of $1 million as of December 31, 2016, which consisted primarily of a corporate aircraft owned by MHC.

(5)Jointly Owned Utility Facilities

Refer to Note 5 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


(6)Regulatory Matters

Refer to Note 6 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(7)Investments and Restricted Cash and Investments

Refer to Note 7 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. In addition to MidAmerican Energy's investments and restricted cash and investments, MHC had corporate-owned life insurance policies in a Rabbi trust owned by MHC with a total cash surrender value of $2 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

(8)Short-Term Debt and Credit Facilities

Refer to Note 8 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. In addition to MidAmerican Energy's credit facilities, MHC has a $4 million unsecured credit facility, which expires in June 2018 and has a variable interest rate based on LIBOR plus a spread. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, there were no borrowings outstanding under this credit facility. As of December 31, 2017, MHC was in compliance with the covenants of its credit facility.

(9)Long-Term Debt

Refer to Note 9 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(10)Income Taxes

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act enacted on December 22, 2017 (the "2017 Tax Reform") impacts many areas of income tax law. The most material items include the reduction of the federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and limitations on bonus depreciation for utility property. Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") require the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates be recognized in the period the tax rate change was enacted. As a result of the 2017 Tax Reform, MHC reduced deferred income tax liabilities $1,822 million. As it is probable the change in deferred taxes for MHC's regulated businesses will be passed back to customers through regulatory mechanisms, MHC increased net regulatory liabilities by $1,845 million.

In December 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin ("SAB") 118 to assist in the implementation process of the 2017 Tax Reform by allowing for calculations to be classified as provisional and subject to remeasurement. There are three different classifications for the accounting: (1) completed, (2) not complete but reasonably estimable or (3) not complete and amounts are not reasonably estimable. MHC has recorded the impacts of the 2017 Tax Reform and believes all the impacts to be complete with the exception of interpretations of the bonus depreciation rules. MHC has determined the amounts recorded and the interpretations relating to this item to be provisional and subject to remeasurement during the measurement period upon obtaining the necessary additional information to complete the accounting. MHC believes its interpretations for bonus depreciation to be reasonable; however, as the guidance is clarified estimates may change. The accounting is estimated to be completed by December 2018.

MHC's income tax benefit from continuing operations consists of the following for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
Current:     
Federal$(489) $(478) $(411)
State(25) (14) (6)
 (514) (492) (417)
Deferred:     
Federal338
 367
 282
State(3) (4) (5)
 335
 363
 277
      
Investment tax credits(1) (1) (1)
Total$(180) $(130) $(141)

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to MHC's effective income tax rate applicable to income before income tax benefit from continuing operations is as follows for the years ended December 31:
 2017 2016 2015
      
Federal statutory income tax rate35 % 35 % 35 %
Income tax credits(68) (60) (67)
State income tax, net of federal income tax benefit(4) (3) (2)
Effects of ratemaking(7) (3) (12)
2017 Tax Reform2
 
 
Other, net(1) 
 1
Effective income tax rate(43)% (31)% (45)%

Income tax credits relate primarily to production tax credits earned by MidAmerican Energy's wind-powered generating facilities. Federal renewable electricity production tax credits are earned as energy from qualifying wind-powered generating facilities is produced and sold and are based on a per-kilowatt hour rate pursuant to the applicable federal income tax law. Interim recognition of production tax credits in income is based on the annualized effective tax rate applied each period, similar to all book to tax differences. Recognition of production tax credits in income during interim periods of the year may vary significantly from actual amounts earned. Wind-powered generating facilities are eligible for the credits for 10 years from the date the qualifying generating facilities are placed in-service.

MHC's net deferred income tax liability consists of the following as of December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016
Deferred income tax assets:   
Regulatory liabilities$443
 $333
Asset retirement obligations160
 230
Employee benefits45
 66
Other62
 82
Total deferred income tax assets710
 711
    
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Depreciable property(2,868) (3,767)
Regulatory assets(42) (471)
Other(35) (41)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(2,945) (4,279)
    
Net deferred income tax liability$(2,235) $(3,568)

As of December 31, 2017, MHC has available $40 million of state tax carryforwards, principally related to $583 million of net operating losses, that expire at various intervals between 2018 and 2036.

The United States Internal Revenue Service has closed its examination of BHE's income tax returns through December 31, 2009, including components related to MHC. In addition, state jurisdictions have closed their examinations of MidAmerican Energy's income tax returns for Iowa through December 31, 2013, for Illinois through December 31, 2008, and for other jurisdictions through December 31, 2009.


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of MHC's net unrecognized tax benefits is as follows for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016
    
Beginning balance$10
 $10
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year1
 
Additions for tax positions of prior years23
 10
Reductions based on tax positions related to the current year(4) (2)
Reductions for tax positions of prior years(19) (8)
Interest and penalties1
 
Ending balance$12
 $10

As of December 31, 2017, MHC had unrecognized tax benefits totaling $39 million that, if recognized, would have an impact on the effective tax rate. The remaining unrecognized tax benefits relate to tax positions for which ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty as to the timing of such deductibility. Recognition of these tax benefits, other than applicable interest and penalties, would not affect MHC's effective income tax rate.

(11)Employee Benefit Plans

Refer to Note 11 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for additional information regarding MHC's pension, supplemental retirement and postretirement benefit plans.

Pension and postretirement costs allocated by MHC to its parent and other affiliates in each of the years ended December 31, were as follows (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
      
Pension costs$4
 $4
 $4
Other postretirement costs(3) (1) (2)

(12)Asset Retirement Obligations

Refer to Note 12 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(13)Risk Management and Hedging Activities

Refer to Note 13 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(14)Fair Value Measurements

Refer to Note 14 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(15)Commitments and Contingencies

Refer to Note 15 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

Legal Matters

MHC is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. MHC does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material impact on its consolidated financial results.

(16)Components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, Net

Refer to Note 16 of MidAmerican Energy's Notes to Financial Statements in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

(17)Other Income and (Expense) - Other, Net

Other, net, as shown on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, includes the following other income (expense) items for the years ended December 31 (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
      
Corporate-owned life insurance income$13
 $8
 $4
Gain on redemption of auction rate securities
 5
 
Gains on sales of assets and other investments1
 3
 13
Interest income and other, net7
 2
 3
Total$21
 $18
 $20

MidAmerican Funding recognized a $13 million pre-tax gain on the sale of an investment in a generating facility lease in 2015.

(18)Supplemental Cash Flow Information

The summary of supplemental cash flow information as of and for the years ending December 31 is as follows (in millions):
 2017 2016 2015
Supplemental cash flow information:     
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized$193
 $181
 $154
Income taxes received, net$463
 $600
 $621
      
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing transactions:     
Accounts payable related to utility plant additions$224
 $131
 $249
Transfer of assets and liabilities to affiliate (note 3)$
 $90
 $

(19)Related Party Transactions

The companies identified as affiliates of MHC are Berkshire Hathaway and its subsidiaries, including BHE and its subsidiaries. The basis for the following transactions is provided for in service agreements between MHC and the affiliates.

MHC is reimbursed for charges incurred on behalf of its affiliates. The majority of these reimbursed expenses are for allocated general costs, such as insurance and building rent, and for employee wages, benefits and costs for corporate functions, such as information technology, human resources, treasury, legal and accounting. The amount of such reimbursements was $46 million, $35 million and $35 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

MHC reimbursed BHE in the amount of $7 million, $6 million and $7 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, for its share of corporate expenses.

MidAmerican Energy purchases natural gas transportation and storage capacity services from Northern Natural Gas Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of BHE, and coal transportation services from BNSF Railway Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, in the normal course of business at either tariffed or market prices. These purchases totaled $122 million, $135 million and $165 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

MHC has a $300 million revolving credit arrangement carrying interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate plus a spread to borrow from BHE. Outstanding balances are unsecured and due on demand. The outstanding balance was $164 million at an interest rate of 1.629% as of December 31, 2017, and $31 million at an interest rate of 0.885% as of December 31, 2016, and is reflected as note payable to affiliate on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

BHE has a $100 million revolving credit arrangement carrying interest at the 30-day LIBOR rate plus a spread to borrow from MHC. Outstanding balances are unsecured and due on demand. There were no borrowings outstanding throughout 2017 and 2016.


MHC settles all obligations of MidAmerican Funding including primarily interest costs on MidAmerican Funding's long-term debt. In 2017, MHC paid for MidAmerican Funding's redemption of a portion of its long-term debt through a tender offer. Net amounts paid by MHC on behalf of MidAmerican Funding totaled $130 million, $13 million and $13 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

MHC had accounts receivable from affiliates of $438 million and $306 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, that are reflected in receivables, net and receivable from affiliate on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. MHC also had accounts payable to affiliates of $14 million and $12 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, that are included in accounts payable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

MHC is party to a tax-sharing agreement and is part of the Berkshire Hathaway consolidated United States federal income tax return. For current federal and state income taxes, MHC had a receivable from BHE of $51 million as of December 31, 2017, and a payable to BHE of $7 million as of December 31, 2016. MHC received net cash receipts for federal and state income taxes from BHE totaling $463 million, $600 million and $621 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

MHC recognizes the full amount of the funded status for its pension and postretirement plans, and amounts attributable to MHC's affiliates that have not previously been recognized through income are recognized as an intercompany balance with such affiliates. MHC adjusts these balances when changes to the funded status of the respective plans are recognized and does not intend to settle the balances currently. Amounts receivable from affiliates attributable to the funded status of employee benefit plans totaled $16 million and $12 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and similar amounts payable to affiliates totaled $45 million and $36 million, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. See Note 11 for further information pertaining to pension and postretirement accounting.

(20)Segment Information

MHC has identified two reportable operating segments: regulated electric and regulated gas. The previously reported nonregulated energy segment consisted substantially of MidAmerican Energy's unregulated retail services business, which was transferred to a subsidiary of BHE and is excluded from the information below related to the statements of operations for all periods presented. The regulated electric segment derives most of its revenue from regulated retail sales of electricity to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and from wholesale sales. The regulated gas segment derives most of its revenue from regulated retail sales of natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers and also obtains revenue by transporting gas owned by others through its distribution system. Pricing for regulated electric and regulated gas sales are established separately by regulatory agencies; therefore, management also reviews each segment separately to make decisions regarding allocation of resources and in evaluating performance. Common operating costs, interest income, interest expense and income tax expense are allocated to each segment based on certain factors, which primarily relate to the nature of the cost. "Other" in the tables below consists principally of the nonregulated subsidiaries of MHC not engaged in the energy business. Refer to Note 10 for a discussion of items affecting income tax (benefit) expense for the regulated electric and gas operating segments.


The following tables provide information on a reportable segment basis (in millions):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating revenue:     
Regulated electric$2,108
 $1,985
 $1,837
Regulated gas719
 637
 661
Other19
 9
 17
Total operating revenue$2,846
 $2,631
 $2,515
      
Depreciation and amortization:     
Regulated electric$458
 $436
 $366
Regulated gas42
 43
 41
Total depreciation and amortization$500
 $479
 $407
      
Operating income:     
Regulated electric$485
 $497
 $385
Regulated gas77
 68
 64
Other
 1
 2
Total operating income$562
 $566
 $451
      
Interest expense:     
Regulated electric$196
 $178
 $166
Regulated gas18
 18
 17
Other1
 
 1
Total interest expense$215
 $196
 $184
      
Income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations:     
Regulated electric$(212) $(156) $(163)
Regulated gas29
 22
 16
Other3
 4
 6
Total income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations$(180) $(130) $(141)
      
Net income:     
Regulated electric$570
 $512
 $413
Regulated gas35
 32
 33
Other(1) 1
 10
Income from continuing operations604
 545
 456
Income on discontinued operations
 
 16
Net income$604
 $545
 $472
      
Utility construction expenditures:     
Regulated electric$1,686
 $1,564
 $1,365
Regulated gas87
 72
 81
Total utility construction expenditures$1,773
 $1,636
 $1,446


 As of December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Total assets:     
Regulated electric$16,105
 $15,304
 $14,161
Regulated gas1,482
 1,424
 1,330
Other451
 317
 468
Total assets$18,038
 $17,045
 $15,959

Goodwill by reportable segment as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows (in millions):
Regulated electric$1,191
Regulated gas79
Total$1,270


EXHIBIT INDEX

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.54.4
4.64.5
4.74.6
4.84.7
4.9
4.104.8

Exhibit No.4.9
Description

4.11
4.124.10
494


Exhibit No.Description


4.11
4.134.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.144.17
4.154.18
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20
4.214.19
4.224.20

Exhibit No.
Description

4.23
4.24
4.25
4.26
4.274.21
4.284.22
4.294.23
4.304.24
495


4.31Exhibit No.Description


4.25
4.324.26
4.33
4.34
4.35

Exhibit No.
Description

4.36
4.374.27
4.384.28
4.394.29
4.404.30
4.414.31
4.424.32
4.434.33
4.444.34
4.454.35
4.36
4.37
4.464.38
496


4.47Exhibit No.Description


4.39

Exhibit No.
Description

4.48
4.49
4.50
4.51
4.524.40
4.534.41
4.42
4.544.43
4.554.44
4.564.45
4.574.46
4.584.47
4.594.48
4.604.49

Exhibit No.4.50
Description

4.61
4.624.51
4.634.52
497


Exhibit No.Description


4.53
4.54
4.55
4.644.56
4.654.57
4.664.58
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.410.3
10.510.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
498


Exhibit No.Description


10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11

Exhibit No.10.12
Description

10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18*

14.1
21.1
23.1
24.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2


PACIFICORP
499


10.24*Exhibit No.Description


10.19*
10.25*10.20*
10.26*10.21*
12.114.2
12.2
14.2
23.2
31.3
31.4
32.3

Exhibit No.32.4
Description

32.4


500


Exhibit No.Description


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY AND PACIFICORP
4.674.59Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of January 9, 1989, between PacifiCorp and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as successor Trustee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-E to the PacifiCorp Form 8-B, as supplemented and modified by 2833 Supplemental Indentures, each incorporated by reference, as follows:
ExhibitPacifiCorp
NumberExhibit NumberPacifiCorp File TypeFile Date
(4)(b)(a)
SENovember 2, 1989
(4)(a)(a)
8-KJanuary 9, 1990
(4)(a)(a)
8-KSeptember 11, 1991
(4)(a)(a)
8-KJanuary 7, 1992
(4)(a)(a)
10-QQuarter ended March 31, 1992
(4)(a)(a)
10-QQuarter ended September 30, 1992
(4)(a)(a)
8-KApril 1, 1993
(4)(a)(a)
10-QQuarter ended September 30, 1993
10-QQuarter ended June 30, 1994
10-KYear ended December 31, 1994
10-KYear ended December 31, 1995
10-KYear ended December 31, 1996
10-KYear ended December 31, 1998
8-KNovember 21, 2001
10-QQuarter ended June 30, 2003
8-KSeptember 9, 2003
8-KAugust 26, 2004
8-KJune 14, 2005
8-KAugust 14, 2006
8-KMarch 14, 2007
8-KOctober 3, 2007
8-KJuly 17, 2008
8-KJanuary 8, 2009
8-KMay 12, 2011
8-KJanuary 6, 2012
8-KJune 6, 2013
8-KMarch 13, 2014
8-KJune 19, 2015

8-KJuly 13, 2018
10.278-KMarch 1, 2019
8-KApril 8, 2020
8-KJuly 9, 2021
8-KDecember 1, 2022
10.22
10.28
9510.23
95

501


Exhibit No.
Description





MIDAMERICAN ENERGY


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY, MIDAMERICAN ENERGY AND MIDAMERICAN FUNDING
502

4.744.65
4.754.66
4.764.67
4.77
4.784.68
4.794.69
4.804.70
4.814.71
4.824.72
4.834.73
4.844.74
4.854.75
4.864.76
4.874.77

Exhibit No.4.78
Description

4.88
4.894.79
4.904.80
4.914.81
4.924.82
503


4.93Exhibit No.Description


4.83
4.944.84
4.85
4.86
4.87
4.88
4.89
4.90
4.91
4.92
4.954.93
4.964.94
4.974.95
10.2910.24

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY AND MIDAMERICAN FUNDING
4.984.96

NEVADA POWER
504


3.11Exhibit No.Description



NEVADA POWER
3.12
3.123.13

Exhibit No.4.97
Description

4.99
4.1004.98
10.3010.25
12.310.26
14.5
23.4
31.9
31.10
32.9
32.10


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY AND NEVADA POWER
4.1014.99
4.1024.100
4.103
4.1044.101
4.1054.102
4.106
4.1074.103
4.108
4.109

Exhibit No.4.104
Description

4.110
505


Exhibit No.Description


4.1114.105
10.314.106
4.107
4.108
4.109
10.27


SIERRA PACIFIC
3.133.14
3.143.15
4.1124.110
4.1134.111
4.1144.112
10.3210.28
12.410.29
14.6
31.11
31.12
32.11
506


Exhibit No.Description


32.12


Exhibit No.
Description


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY AND SIERRA PACIFIC
4.1154.113
4.1164.114
4.1174.115
4.116
4.1184.117
4.1194.118
4.1204.119
10.334.120
4.121
10.30

ALL REGISTRANTS
EASTERN ENERGY GAS
507


Exhibit No.Description



BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY AND EASTERN ENERGY GAS
4.122
4.123
4.124
4.125
4.126
4.127
4.128
4.129
4.130
4.131
4.132
4.133
4.134
508


Exhibit No.Description



EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE
3.19
3.20
10.34
10.35
31.15
31.16
32.15
32.16

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY AND EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE
4.136
4.137
4.138
4.139
4.140
4.141

509


Exhibit No.Description


ALL REGISTRANTS
101The following financial information from each respective Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20172022 is formatted in XBRL (eXtensibleiXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language) and included herein: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged in summary and detail.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File formatted in iXBRL (Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language) and contained in Exhibit 101.

(a)    Not available electronically on the SEC website as it was filed in paper previous to the electronic system currently in place.


*    Management contract or compensatory plan.

Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, each Registrant has not filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K certain instruments with respect to long-term debt not registered in which the total amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10% of the total assets of the respective Registrant. Each Registrant hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the Commission upon request.

510





SIGNATURES


BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on this 23rd24th day of February 2018.

2023.
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ENERGY COMPANY
/s/ William J. Fehrman*
William J. Fehrman
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ William J. Fehrman*Director, President and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 24, 2023
William J. Fehrman(principal executive officer)
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ William J. Fehrman*Calvin D. Haack*Director,Senior Vice President and Chief ExecutiveFinancial OfficerFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
William J. FehrmanCalvin D. Haack(principal executive officer)
/s/ Patrick J. Goodman*Executive Vice President andFebruary 23, 2018
Patrick J. GoodmanChief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Gregory E. Abel*Executive ChairmanChair of the Board of DirectorsFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Gregory E. Abelof Directors
/s/ Warren E. Buffett*DirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Warren E. Buffett
/s/ Marc D. Hamburg*DirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Marc D. Hamburg
/s/ Walter Scott, Jr.*DirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Walter Scott, Jr.
*By: /s/ Natalie L. HockenAttorney-in-FactFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Natalie L. Hocken





511



SIGNATURES


PACIFICORP


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on this 23rd24th day of February 2018.

2023.
PACIFICORP
PACIFICORP
/s/ Nikki L. Kobliha
Nikki L. Kobliha
Director, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Treasurer
(principal financial and accounting officer)


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Scott W. ThonChair of the Board of Directors and Chief ExecutiveFebruary 24, 2023
Scott W. ThonOfficer
(principal executive officer)
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ William J. Fehrman

Chairman of the Board of Directors,February 23, 2018
William J. Fehrman

President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
/s/ Nikki L. KoblihaDirector, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Nikki L. KoblihaOfficer and Treasurer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Stefan A. BirdDirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Stefan A. Bird
/s/ Cindy A. CraneCalvin D. HaackDirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Cindy A. CraneCalvin D. Haack
/s/ Patrick J. GoodmanDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Patrick J. Goodman
/s/ Natalie L. HockenDirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Natalie L. Hocken
/s/ Gary W. HoogeveenDirectorFebruary 24, 2023
Gary W. Hoogeveen



512



SIGNATURES


MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on this 23rd24th day of February 2018.

2023.
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY
MIDAMERICAN ENERGY COMPANY/s/ Kelcey A. Brown
Kelcey A. Brown
/s/ Adam L. Wright
Adam L. Wright
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Kelcey A. BrownDirector, President and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 24, 2023
Kelcey A. Brown(principal executive officer)
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Adam L. WrightDirector, President and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 23, 2018
Adam L. Wright(principal executive officer)
/s/ Thomas B. SpecketerDirector, Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Thomas B. SpecketerChief Financial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Robert B. BerntsenDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Robert B. Berntsen



513



SIGNATURES


MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on this 23rd24th day of February 2018.

2023.
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC
MIDAMERICAN FUNDING, LLC/s/ Kelcey A. Brown
Kelcey A. Brown
/s/ Adam L. Wright
Adam L. Wright
Manager and President
(principal executive officer)


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Kelcey A. BrownManager and PresidentFebruary 24, 2023
Kelcey A. Brown(principal executive officer)
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Adam L. WrightManager and PresidentFebruary 23, 2018
Adam L. Wright(principal executive officer)
/s/ Thomas B. SpecketerVice President and ControllerFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Thomas B. Specketer(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Daniel S. FickManagerFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Daniel S. Fick
/s/ Patrick J. GoodmanCalvin D. HaackManagerFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Patrick J. GoodmanCalvin D. Haack
/s/ Natalie L. HockenManagerFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Natalie L. Hocken



514



SIGNATURES


NEVADA POWER COMPANY


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on this 23rd24th day of February 2018.

2023.
NEVADA POWER COMPANY
/s/ Paul J. CaudillDouglas A. Cannon
Paul J. CaudillDouglas A. Cannon
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Douglas A. CannonDirector, President and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 24, 2023
Douglas A. Cannon(principal executive officer)
Signature/s/ Michael J. BehrensTitleInterim Chief Financial OfficerDateFebruary 24, 2023
Michael J. Behrens
/s/ Paul J. CaudillDirector and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 23, 2018
Paul J. Caudill(principal executive officer)
/s/ E. Kevin BethelDirector, Senior Vice President and ChiefFebruary 23, 2018
E. Kevin BethelFinancial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Douglas A. CannonBrandon M. BarkhuffDirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Douglas A. CannonBrandon M. Barkhuff
/s/ Patrick S. EganDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Patrick S. Egan
/s/ Shawn M. EliceguiDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Shawn M. Elicegui

/s/ Kevin C. GeraghtyDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Kevin C. Geraghty
/s/ Jennifer L. OswaldDirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Jennifer L. Oswald
/s/ Anthony F. Sanchez, IIIDirectorFebruary 24, 2023
Anthony F. Sanchez, III



515



SIGNATURES


SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on this 23rd24th day of February 2018.

2023.
SIERRA PACIFIC POWER COMPANY
/s/ Paul J. CaudillDouglas A. Cannon
Paul J. CaudillDouglas A. Cannon
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:

SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Douglas A. CannonDirector, President and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 24, 2023
Douglas A. Cannon(principal executive officer)
Signature/s/ Michael J. BehrensTitleInterim Chief Financial OfficerDateFebruary 24, 2023
Michael J. Behrens
/s/ Paul J. CaudillDirector and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 23, 2018
Paul J. Caudill(principal executive officer)
/s/ E. Kevin BethelDirector, Senior Vice President and ChiefFebruary 23, 2018
E. Kevin BethelFinancial Officer
(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Douglas A. CannonBrandon M. BarkhuffDirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Douglas A. CannonBrandon M. Barkhuff
/s/ Patrick S. EganDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Patrick S. Egan
/s/ Shawn M. EliceguiDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Shawn M. Elicegui
/s/ Kevin C. GeraghtyDirectorFebruary 23, 2018
Kevin C. Geraghty
/s/ Jennifer L. OswaldDirectorFebruary 23, 201824, 2023
Jennifer L. Oswald
/s/ Anthony F. Sanchez, IIIDirectorFebruary 24, 2023
Anthony F. Sanchez, III



516



SIGNATURES

EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on this 24th day of February 2023.
EASTERN ENERGY GAS HOLDINGS, LLC
/s/ Paul E. Ruppert
Paul E. Ruppert
President and Chief Executive Officer
(principal executive officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Paul E. RuppertPresident and Chief Executive OfficerFebruary 24, 2023
Paul E. Ruppert(principal executive officer)
/s/ Scott C. MillerVice President, Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerFebruary 24, 2023
Scott C. Miller(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Mark A. HewettManagerFebruary 24, 2023
Mark A. Hewett
/s/ Calvin D. HaackManagerFebruary 24, 2023
Calvin D. Haack
/s/ Natalie L. HockenManagerFebruary 24, 2023
Natalie L. Hocken
517



SIGNATURES

EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on this 24th day of February 2023.
EASTERN GAS TRANSMISSION AND STORAGE, INC.
/s/ Paul E. Ruppert
Paul E. Ruppert
President and Chair of the Board of Directors
(principal executive officer)
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated:
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Paul E. RuppertPresident and Chair of the Board of DirectorsFebruary 24, 2023
Paul E. Ruppert(principal executive officer)
/s/ Scott C. MillerVice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer andFebruary 24, 2023
Scott C. MillerDirector
(principal financial and accounting officer)
/s/ Anne E. BomarSenior Vice President, General Counsel and DirectorFebruary 24, 2023
Anne E. Bomar
518


SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION TO BE FURNISHED WITH REPORTS FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15(D) OF THE ACT BY REGISTRANTS WHICH HAVE NOT REGISTERED SECURITIES PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE ACT


No annual report to security holders covering each respective Registrant's last fiscal year or proxy material has been sent to security holders.





448
519