UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)


Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017


2020

or


Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934


For the transition period from _____________to_____________


to

Commission File No.: 000-25805


Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Virginia54-1288193

Virginia

54-1288193

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

10 Courthouse Square, Warrenton, Virginia

20186

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)


(540) 347-2700

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

 Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, par value $3.13 per share

 FBSS

The Nasdaq Capital Market


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:None


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes  No


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Yes  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web Site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large“large accelerated filer," "accelerated” “accelerated filer," "smaller” “smaller reporting company," and "emerging“emerging growth company"company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to not use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  


Indicate by check mark ifwhether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)Act). Yes No


The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant at June 30, 2017,2020, was $67.9$50.8 million.

The registrant had 3,773,9713,807,659 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 20, 2018.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.
25, 2021.



TABLE OF CONTENTS


Page

PART I

Item 1.

2

Item 1A.

8

11

Item 1B.

8

21

Item 2.

9

21

Item 3.

9

21

Item 4.

9

21

PART II

Item 5.

9

22

Item 6.

10

23

Item 7.

11

24

Item 7A.

24

40

Item 8.

25

41

Item 9.

59

79

Item 9A.

59

79

Item 9B.

59

79

PART III

Item 10

59

80

Item 11.

59

83

Item 12.

59

94

Item 13.

60

96

Item 14.

60

97

PART IV

Item 15.

60

98

Item 16.

Signatures

62

99


1


PART I


ITEM 1. BUSINESS


BUSINESS

GENERAL

Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. (the Company”(“Fauquier” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia on January 13, 1984. The Company is a registered bank holding company and owns all of the voting shares of The Fauquier Bank (the “Bank”). The Company engages in its business through the Bank, a Virginia state-chartered bank that commenced operations in 1902. The Company has no significant operations other than owning the stock of the Bank.


Merger between the Company and Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (“Virginia National”).

On October 1, 2020 the Company and Virginia National announced a definitive agreement to combine in a strategic merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company will merge with and into Virginia National (the “Merger”). Upon consummation of the Merger, the holders of shares of the Company's common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.675 shares of Virginia National common stock for each share of the Company's common stock held immediately prior to the effective date of the Merger, plus cash in lieu of fractional shares. The transaction is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2021.  The companies have received regulatory and shareholder approvals, and the transaction remains subject to other customary closing conditions.

THE FAUQUIER BANK

The Bank’s general market area principally includes Fauquier County, Prince William County and neighboring communities, and is located approximately 50 miles southwest of Washington, D.C. The Bank provides a full range of consumerfinancial services, including internet banking, mobile banking, commercial, retail, insurance, wealth management, and commercialfinancial planning services through eleven banking offices throughout Fauquier and Prince William counties in Virginia.

The Bank provides retail banking services to individuals businesses and industries. Asbusinesses. These services include various types of January 1, 2018, the Bank had 11 full service branch offices and approximately 12 automated teller machines (“ATM”) located throughout its market area.


The basic services offered by the Bank include: interest and noninterest-bearing demand depositchecking accounts, money market depositand savings accounts, negotiable order of withdrawal (“NOW”) accounts,and time deposits, safe deposit services, automated teller machines (“ATM”), debit and credit cards, cash management, direct deposits, notary services, night depository, prepaid debit cards, cashier’s checks, domestic and international collections, automated teller services, drive-in tellers, mobile and internet banking, telephone banking, and banking by mail.deposits.  In addition, the Bank makesprovides secured and unsecured commercial and real estate loans, issues stand-bystandby letters of credit, secured and grants availableunsecured lines of credit, for installment, unsecured and secured personal loans, residential mortgages and home equity loans, as well as automobile and other types of consumer financing. The deposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).  The Bank provides ATM cards, as a part of the Maestro, Accel - Exchange, and Plus ATM networks, thereby permitting customers to utilize the convenience of larger ATM networks. The Bank also is a member of the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) and Insured Cash Sweep Service (“ICS”), to provide customers multi-million dollar FDIC insurance on certificate of deposit investments and deposit sweeps through the transfer and/or exchange with other FDIC insured institutions. CDARS and ICS are registered service marks of Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC.

The Bank operates a Wealth Management Services (“WMS” or “Wealth Management”) division that began with the granting of trust powers to the Bank in 1919. The WMS division providesoffers a full range of personalized services that include investment management, financial planning, trust, estate settlement, retirement, insurance and brokerage services.


The Bank, through its subsidiary Fauquier Bank Services, Inc., has equity ownership interests in Bankers Insurance, LLC, a Virginia independent insurance company, and Bankers Title Shenandoah, LLC, a title insurance company and Infinex Investments, Inc., a full service broker/dealer. Bankers Insurance and Bankers Title Shenandoahwhich are owned by a consortium of Virginia community banks, andbanks.  Fauquier Bank Services, Inc. also previously had an equity ownership interest in Infinex isInvestments, Inc., a full service broker/dealer owned by banks and banking associations in various states.


states, whose ownership was sold by Fauquier Bank Services, Inc. in January 2019.

The revenues of the Bank are primarily derived from interest on, and fees received in connection with, real estate and otheron loans, and from interest and dividends from investment and mortgage-backed securities, and short-term investments.securities.  The principal sources of funds for the Bank’s lending activities are its deposits, repayment of loans, the sale and maturity of investment securities, and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”). Additional revenues are derived from fees for deposit-relateddeposit and WMS-relatedWMS related services. The Bank’s principal expenses are salaries and benefits and occupancy expense.


As is the case with banking institutions generally, the Bank’s operations are materially and significantly influenced by general economic conditions and by related monetary and fiscal policies of financial institution regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (“Federal Reserve”). As a Virginia-chartered bank and a member of the Federal Reserve, the Bank is supervised and examined by the Federal Reserve and the Bureau of Financial Institutions of the Virginia State Corporation Commission (“SCC”). Interest rates on competing investments and general market rates of interest influence deposit flows and costs of funds. Lending activities are affected by the demand for financing of real estate and other types of loans, which in turn is affected by the interest rates at which such financing may be offered and other factors affecting local demand and availability of funds. The Bank faces strong competition in the attraction of deposits (its primary source of lendable funds) and in the origination of loans. See “Competition” below.

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had total consolidated assets of $644.6 million, total consolidated loans net of allowance for loan losses of $497.7 million, total consolidated deposits of $570.0 million, and total consolidated shareholders’ equity of $56.1 million.

LENDING ACTIVITIES

The Bank offers a range of lending services, including real estate and commercial loans, to individuals, as well as, small-to-medium sized businesses and other organizations that are located in or conduct a substantial portion of their business in the Bank’s market area. The majority of the Bank’s total net loans at December 31, 2017, were $497.7 million, or 77.2% of total assets.are made on a secured basis. The interest rates charged on loans vary with the degree of risk, maturity, and amount of the loan, and are further subject to competitive pressures, money market rates, availability of funds and government regulations. The Bank has no foreign loans, sub-primesubprime loans or loans for highly leveraged transactions.


The Bank’s general market area for lending consists of Fauquier and Prince William Counties, Virginia and the neighboring communities. There is no assurance that this area will experience economic growth. Deteriorating economic conditions, in Fauquier or Prince William Counties,including as a result of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) pandemic, as well as declines in the market value of local commercial and/or residential real estate, may have an adverse effect on the Company and the Bank.


2


Table of Contents

The Bank’s loans are concentrated inloan portfolio includes the following areas:segments: commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, construction and land, consumer and student, residential real estate and home equity lines of credit.  

COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL LOANS

Commercial loans commercial real estateinclude loans construction and landfor working capital, equipment purchases, SBA-backed loans commercial and industrial loans, consumerincluding PPP loans, and U.S. Government guaranteed student loans. The majority ofvarious other business purposes. Business assets are the primary collateral for the Bank’s commercial loan portfolio.  Commercial loans have variable or fixed rates of interest. Commercial lines of credit are madetypically granted on a securedone-year basis.  As of December 31, 2017, approximately 92.0% of the loan portfolio consisted ofOther commercial loans secured by mortgages on real estate.


2

LOANS SECURED BY REAL ESTATE
1- 4 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE. The Bank’s 1-4 family residential real estate loan portfolio primarily consists of conventional loans, generally with fixedterms or amortization schedules longer than one year will normally carry interest rates with 15 or 30 year terms,that vary based on financial indices and balloon loans with fixed interest rates,are generally payable in three to five years.

Loan originations are derived from a number of sources, including existing customers and 3, 5, 7, or 10-year maturities utilizing amortization schedules of 30 years or less. As of December 31, 2017,borrowers, walk-in customers, advertising, and direct solicitation by the Bank’s 1-4 family residential loans amounted to $187.1 million, or 37.2% of the total loan portfolio. The majority of the Bank’s single-family residential mortgage loans are secured by properties locatedofficers. Inherent risks within this portfolio include interest rate and prepayment risks, risks resulting from uncertainties in the Bank’s market area.future value of collateral and changes in economic and industry conditions.  In particular, longer maturities increase the risk that economic conditions will change and adversely affect the Bank's ability to collect. The Bank requires private mortgage insurance ifattempts to minimize loan losses by including the principal amountdebtors’ cash flow as the source of the loan exceeds 80% ofrepayment and, secondarily, the value of the property held asunderlying collateral.


HOME EQUITY LINES OF CREDIT. The Bank’s home equity lines In addition, the Bank attempts to utilize shorter loan terms in order to reduce the risk of credit loan portfolio primarily consists of conventional loans, generally with variable interest rates that are tied to the Wall Street Journal prime rate with 10 year terms. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank’s home equity loans amounted to $44.5 million, or 8.9% of the total loan portfolio. The majority of the Bank’s home equity lines of credit are secured by properties locateda decline in the Bank’s market area. The Bank allows a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 85% of the value of such collateral.

COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS

Loans secured by commercial real estate consist principally of commercial loans for which real estate constitutes the property held as collateral atprimary source of collateral. Commercial real estate loans generally involve a greater degree of risk because repayment may be more vulnerable to adverse conditions in the time of origination.


real estate market or the economy.

CONSTRUCTION AND LAND. LAND LOANS

The majority of the Bank’s construction and land loans are made to individuals to construct a primary residence. Such loans have a maximum term of twelve months, a fixed rate of interest, and loan-to-value ratios of 80% or less of the appraised value upon completion. The Bank requires that permanent financing, with the Bank or some other lender, be in place prior to closing any construction loan.closing. Construction loans are generally considered to involve a higher degree of credit risk than single-family residential mortgage loans. Thebecause the risk of loss on a construction loan is dependent largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion. The Bank also provides construction loans and lines of credit to developers.developers to acquire the necessary land, develop the site and construct the residential units. Such loans generally have maximum loan-to-value ratios of 80% of the appraised value upon completion. The loans are madecompletion with a fixed rate of interest. The majority of these construction loans are made to selected local developers for the building of single-family dwellings on either a pre-sold or speculative basis. The Bank limits the number of unsold units under construction at one time. Loan proceeds are disbursed in stages after inspections of the project indicate that such disbursements are for costs already incurred and that have added to the value of the project.  Construction loans include loans to developers to acquire the necessary land, develop the site and construct the residential units. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank’s construction and land loans totaled $54.2 million, or 10.8% of the total loan portfolio, which includes $17.1 million of commercial acquisition and development loans, $25.4 million of raw land loans and $1.3 million of agricultural land loans.


COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE. Loans secured by commercial real estate comprised $176.8 million, or 35.2% of total loans at December 31, 2017, and consist principally of commercial loans for which real estate constitutes a source of collateral. Approximately $85.5 million or 48.4% of commercial real estate loans are owner-occupied. Commercial real estate loans generally involve a greater degree of risk than single-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of commercial real estate loans may be more vulnerable to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy.

COMMERCIAL LOANS
The Bank’s commercial loans include loans to individuals and small-to-medium sized businesses located primarily in Fauquier and Prince William Counties for working capital, equipment purchases, and various other business purposes. Equipment or similar assets secure approximately 92.7% of the Bank’s commercial loans, on a dollar-value basis, and the remaining 7.3% of commercial loans are on an unsecured basis. Commercial loans have variable or fixed rates of interest. Commercial lines of credit are typically granted on a one-year basis. Other commercial loans with terms or amortization schedules longer than one year will normally carry interest rates that vary with the prime lending rate and other financial indices and will be payable in full in three to five years.

Loan originations are derived from a number of sources, including existing customers and borrowers, walk-in customers, advertising, and direct solicitation by the Bank’s loan officers. Certain credit risks are inherent in originating and keeping loans on the Bank’s balance sheet. These include interest rate and prepayment risks, risks resulting from uncertainties in the future value of collateral, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, and risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers. In particular, longer maturities increase the risk that economic conditions will change and adversely affect the Bank's ability to collect. The Bank attempts to minimize loan losses through various means. In particular, on larger credits, the Bank generally relies on the cash flow of a debtor as the source of repayment and secondarily on the value of the underlying collateral. In addition, the Bank attempts to utilize shorter loan terms in order to reduce the risk of a decline in the value of such collateral. The commercial loan portfolio was $24.4 million or 4.9% of total loans at December 31, 2017.

CONSUMER AND STUDENT LOANS

The Bank’s consumer loans include loans to individuals such as auto loans, credit card loans and overdraft loans. The consumer loan portfolio was $5.1 million or 1.0% of total loans at December 31, 2017.


The Bank also has U.S. Government guaranteed student loans, which were purchased through and serviced by a third-party and have a variable rate of interest.

RESIDENTIAL REAL ESTATE LOANS

The U.S. Government guaranteed studentBank’s 1-4 family residential real estate loan portfolio was $10.7 millionprimarily consists of conventional loans, generally with fixed interest rates with 15 or 2.1%30-year terms, and balloon loans with fixed interest rates, and 5, 10, or 15 year maturities utilizing amortization schedules of total30 years. The majority of the Bank’s 1-4 family residential mortgage loans are secured by properties located in the Bank’s market area.

HOME EQUITY LINES OF CREDIT

Home equity lines of credit consist of conventional loans, generally with variable interest rates that are tied to the Wall Street Journal prime rate with 10 year terms. The majority of the Bank’s home equity lines of credit are secured by properties located in the Bank’s market area. The Bank allows a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 85% of the value of the property held as collateral at December 31, 2017.


the time of origination.

DEPOSIT ACTIVITIES

Deposits are the major source of the Bank’s funds for lendinglending and other investment activities. The deposits of the Bank are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).  The Bank considers its regularinterest and noninterest-bearing checking accounts, savings demand, NOW, premium NOW,and money market accounts, and non-brokerednonbrokered time deposits under $100,000 to be core deposits. These accounts comprised approximately 93.0% of the Bank’s total deposits at December 31, 2017.  Generally, the Bank attempts to maintain the rates paid on its deposits at a competitive level.  Time deposits of $100,000 through $250,000, and time deposits greater than $250,000 made up approximately 4.1% and 2.8%, respectively,The Bank is a member of the Bank’s total deposits at December 31, 2017. During 2017, time depositsCertificate of $100,000Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) and over generally paid interest at rates the same or higher than certificatesInsured Cash Sweep Service (“ICS”), to provide customers multi-

3


Table of less than $100,000. The majority of the Bank’s deposits are generated from Fauquier and Prince William Counties, Virginia.  Included in interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2017 were $17.3 Contents

million of brokered deposits, or 3.0% of total deposits. Of the brokered deposits, $12.9 million or 2.3% of total deposits represent a reciprocal arrangement for existing Bank customers who desiredollar FDIC insurance for deposits above current limits.


3

deposit investments and deposit sweeps through the transfer and/or exchange with other FDIC insured institutions. CDARS and ICS are registered service marks of Promontory Interfinancial Network, LLC.

INVESTMENTS

The Bank invests a portion of its assets in U.S. Government-sponsored corporation and agency obligations, state, county and municipal obligations, corporate obligations, and mutual funds, FHLB stock and equity securities.funds. The Bank’s investments are managed in relation to loan demand and deposit growth, and are generally used to provide for the investment of excess funds, at reduced yieldswhile also providing liquidity. The Bank’s restricted investments include holdings of FHLB stock and risks relative to yields and risksstock of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the “Reserve Bank”).  

RESPONSE TO THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Following the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020, the business environment in which the Company operates has been subject to numerous changes as a result of public health measures, economic disruption, government intervention and changes in regulation, which have affected the Company’s businesses operationally, including how it serves customers, as well as financially.  The Company has implemented safe and healthy practices of social distancing and enhanced cleaning to protect employees and customers, and has increased options for certain employees to work remotely.  The Company is working proactively with borrowers affected by the pandemic, including by offering short-term modifications, such as payment deferrals or interest only periods, to borrowers who are temporarily unable to make loan portfolio,payments.

The federal government and federal regulatory agencies have introduced numerous initiatives in response to the pandemic.  For example, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), enacted on March 27, 2020, included provisions that, among other things, (i) established the Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) to provide loans guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) to businesses affected by the pandemic, (ii) established the Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility (the “PPPLF”) to provide funding to eligible financial institutions through the Federal Reserve Board system to facilitate lending under the PPP, (iii) provided certain forms of economic stimulus, including direct payments to certain U.S. households, enhanced unemployment benefits, certain income tax benefits intended to assist businesses in surviving the economic crisis, and delayed the required implementation of certain new accounting standards for some entities, and (iv) provided limited regulatory relief to banking institutions.  The federal banking agencies have eased certain bank capital requirements and reporting requirements in response to the pandemic, and have encouraged banking institutions to work prudently with borrowers affected by the pandemic by offering loan modifications that can improve borrowers’ capacity to service debt, increase the potential for financially stressed residential borrowers to keep their homes, and facilitate financial institutions’ ability to collect on their loans.  The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, enacted on December 27, 2020, expanded on some of the benefits made available under the CARES Act, including the PPP program, and provided further economic stimulus.

The Company continues to monitor and respond to developments related to the COVID-19 pandemic and will continue to find ways to improve customer service while providing liquiditycontinuing to fund increases in loan demand or to offset fluctuations in deposits. The Bank’s total unrestrictedprotect customers and restricted investments, at fair value, were $72.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively, or 11.2% and 0.2% of total assets, respectively, at December 31, 2017.


employees.

GOVERNMENT SUPERVISION AND REGULATION

GENERAL.

Bank holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under both federal and state law. The following summary briefly addresses certain provisions of federal and state laws that apply to the Company or the Bank. This summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the particular statutory or regulatory provisions.


EFFECT OF GOVERNMENTAL MONETARY POLICIES. The earnings and business of the Company and the Bank are affected by the economic and monetary policies of various regulatory authorities of the United States, especially the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve.Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). The Federal Reserve, among other things, regulates the supply of credit and money and settingsets interest rates in order to influence general economic conditions within the United States. The instruments of monetary policy employed by the Federal Reserve for those purposes influence in various ways the overall level of investments, loans, other extensions of credits,credit, and deposits, and the interest rates paid on liabilities and received on assets. Federal Reserve monetary policies have had a significant effect on the operating results of commercial banks in the past and are expected to continue to do so in the future.


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002. The Company is subject to the periodic reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including the filing of annual, quarterly, and other reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). As an Exchange Act reporting company, the Company is directly affected by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “SOX”(“SOX”), which is aimed at improving corporate governance, internal controls and reporting procedures. The Company is complying with applicable SEC and other rules and regulations implemented pursuant to the SOX.


4


Table of Contents

BANK HOLDING COMPANY REGULATION. The Company is a one-bank holding company, registered with the Federal Reserve under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the “BHC Act”). As such, the Company is subject to the supervision, examination, and reporting requirements of the BHC Act and the regulations of the Federal Reserve. The Company is required to furnish to the Federal Reserve an annual report of its operations at the end of each fiscal year and such additional information as the Federal Reserve may require pursuant to the BHC Act. The BHC Act generally prohibits the Company from engaging in activities other than banking or managing or controlling banks or other permissible subsidiaries and from acquiring or retaining direct or indirect control of any company engaged in any activities other than those activities determined by the Federal Reserve to be sufficiently related to banking or managing or controlling banks. With some limited exceptions, the BHC Act requires every bank holding company to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve before: acquiring substantially all the assets of any bank; acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting shares of any bank if after such acquisition it would own or control more than 5% of the voting shares of such bank (unless it already owns or controls the majority of such shares); or merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. In addition, and subject to some exceptions, the BHC Act and the Change in Bank Control Act, together with the regulations promulgated thereunder, require Federal Reserve approval prior to any person or company acquiring “control” of a bank holding company.


BANK REGULATION. The Bank is chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia. The FDIC insures the depositsVirginia and is a member of the Bank's customers to the maximum extent provided by law.Federal Reserve System.  The Bank is subject to comprehensive regulation, examination and supervision by the Federal Reserve and the SCCVirginia State Corporation Commission and to other laws and regulations applicable to banks. These regulations include limitations on loans to a single borrower and to the Bank’s directors, officers and employees; requirements on the opening and closing of branch offices; requirements regarding the maintenance of prescribed regulatory capital and liquidity ratios; requirements to grant credit under equal and fair conditions; and requirements to disclose the costs and terms of such credit. The SCCFDIC insures the deposits of the Bank’s customers to the maximum extent provided by law and, as a result, the Bank is also hassubject to regulation by the FDIC.  The Bank’s regulators have broad enforcement powers over the Bank, including the power to impose fines and other civil or criminal penalties and to appoint a receiver in order to conserve the Bank’s assets for the benefit of depositors and other creditors.


The Bank is also subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 (“CRA”). Under the terms of the CRA, the appropriate federal bank regulatory agency is required, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess the bank’s record in meeting the credit needs of the community served by that bank, including low-and moderate-income neighborhoods. The regulatory agency’s assessment of a bank’s record is made available to the public. Such assessment is required of any bank that has applied to (i) charter a national bank, (ii) obtain deposit insurance coverage for a newly chartered institution, (iii) establish a new branch office that will accept deposits, (iv) relocate an office, or (v) merge or consolidate with, or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of, a federally regulated financial institution. In the case of a bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank or other bank holding company, the Federal Reserve will assess the record of each subsidiary bank of the applicant bank holding company, and such records may be the basis for denying the application. The Bank received a rating of “satisfactory” at its last CRA performance evaluation as of February 9, 2015.


May 20, 2019.

In December 2019, the FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency jointly proposed rules that would significantly change existing CRA regulations. The proposed rules are intended to increase bank activity in low- and moderate-income communities where there is significant need for credit, more responsible lending, greater access to banking services, and improvements to critical infrastructure. The proposals change four key areas: (i) clarifying what activities qualify for CRA credit; (ii) updating where activities count for CRA credit; (iii) providing a more transparent and objective method for measuring CRA performance; and (iv) revising CRA-related data collection, record keeping, and reporting.  The Company is evaluating what impact this proposed rule may have on its operations if the rule is implemented and applicable to Federal Reserve member banks.

DIVIDENDS. Dividends from the Bank constitute the primary source of funds for dividends to be paid by the Company. There are various statutory and contractual limitations on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends, extend credit, or otherwise supply funds to the Company, including the requirement under Virginia banking laws that cash dividends only be paid out of net undivided profits and only if such dividends would not impair the capital of the Bank. The Federal Reserve also has the general authority to limit the dividends paid by bank holding companies and state member banks, if the payment of dividends is deemed to constitute an unsafe and unsound practice. The Federal Reserve has indicated that banking organizations should generally pay dividends only if (i) the organization’s net income available to common shareholders over the past year has been sufficient to fund fully the dividends and (ii) the prospective rate of earnings retention appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The Bank does not expect any of these laws, regulations or policies to materially impact its ability to pay dividends to the Company.


DEPOSIT INSURANCE. The depositsEach of the Bank areBank’s depository accounts is insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund (the “DIF”)FDIC against loss to the depositor to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, and federal law and regulatory policy impose a number of obligations and restrictions on the FDICCompany and are subjectthe Bank to deposit insurance assessmentsreduce potential loss exposure to maintaindepositors and to the DIF.  On April 1, 2011, theThe deposit insurance assessment base changed from total deposits tois based on average total

5


Table of Contents

assets minus average tangible equity, pursuant to a rule issued by the FDIC as required by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”).


4

Also, on April 1, 2011, the

The FDIC began utilizingutilizes a risk-based assessment system that imposed insurance premiums based upon a risk category matrix that took into account a bank's capital level and supervisory rating. Effective, July 1, 2016, the FDIC again changed its deposit insurance pricing and eliminated all risk categories and now uses the “financial ratios method” based on the CAMELS composite ratings to determine assessment rates for small established institutions with less than $10 billion in assets.assets, such as the Bank. The CAMELS rating system is a supervisory rating system designed to take into account and reflect all financial and operational risks that a bank may face, including capital adequacy, asset quality, management capability, earnings, liquidity and sensitivity to market risk (“CAMELS”). CAMELS composite ratings set a maximum assessment for CAMELS 1 and 2 rated banks, and set minimum assessments for lower rated institutions.


The FDIC's “reserve ratio” of the DIF to total industry deposits reached its 1.15% target effective June 30, 2016. On March 15,

During 2016, the FDIC implemented by final rule certain Dodd-Frank Act provisions by raisingraised the DIF'sDIF’s minimum reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%., as required by the Dodd-Frank Act.  The FDIC imposed a 4.5 basis point annual surcharge on insured depository institutions with total consolidated assets of $10 billion or more. The new rule grantsgranted credits to smaller banks, such as the Bank, for the portion of their regular assessments that contribute to increasing the reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%.  Prior to whenThe minimum reserve ratio reached 1.35% in the new assessment system became effective,third quarter of 2018; therefore, the Bank's overall rate for assessment calculations was 9 basis points or less, which was within the range of assessment rates for the lowest risk category under the former FDIC assessment rules. In 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded expense of $312,000 and $489,000, respectively, for FDIC insurance premiums.


In addition, all FDIC insured institutions areBank has not been required to pay assessments to the FDIC at an annual rate of approximately one basis point of insured deposits to fund interest payments on bonds issued by the Financing Corporation, an agency of the federal government established to recapitalize the predecessor to the Savings Association Insurance Fund. These assessments will continue until the Financing Corporation bonds mature in 2019.

such a surcharge thereafter.

CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS.  The Company meets the eligibility criteria of a smallFederal bank regulators have issued substantially similar guidelines requiring banks and bank holding company in accordance withcompanies to maintain capital at certain levels.  In addition, regulators may from time to time require that a banking organization maintain capital above the Federal Reserve’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement issued in February 2015, and is no longer obligated to report consolidated regulatory capital. The Bank continues to be subject to various capital requirements administered by banking agencies.minimum levels because of its financial condition or actual or anticipated growth.  Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can trigger certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines that involve quantitative measurescondition and results of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. operations.

The Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.


In July 2013, the Federal Reserve issued final rules that make technical changes to its capitaland the FDIC have adopted rules to align them withimplement the Basel III regulatory capital framework as outlined by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) and meet certain requirementsprovisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rules maintainAct (the “Basel III Capital Rules”). For the general structurepurposes of the prompt corrective action framework in effect at such time while incorporating certain increased minimum requirements. The final rules modified or left unchanged the components of regulatory capital, which are:Basel III Capital Rules, (i) “total capital”, defined as core capital and supplementary capital less certain specified deductions from total capital such as reciprocal holdings of depository institution capital instruments andcommon equity investments; (ii) “TierTier 1 capital” which consists principally of common stock (including surplus) and retained earnings; (ii) Tier 1 capital consists principally of common equity Tier 1 capital plus noncumulative preferred stock and related surplus, and certain qualifyinggrandfathered cumulative preferred shareholders’ equity (including grandfatheredstocks and trust preferred securities) as well as retained earnings, less certain intangibles and other adjustments;securities; and (iii) “TierTier 2 capital”, whichcapital consists of cumulative preferred stock, long-term perpetual preferred stock, a limited amount of subordinated and other qualifying debt (including certain hybrid capital instruments), and a limited amount of the general loan loss allowance. The Federal Reserve also has established a minimum leverage capital ratioprincipally of Tier 1 capital plus qualifying subordinated debt and preferred stock, and limited amounts of an institution’s allowance for loan losses.  Each regulatory capital classification is subject to average adjustedcertain adjustments and limitations, as implemented by the Basel III Capital Rules.  The Basel III Capital Rules also establish risk weightings that are applied to many classes of assets (“Tier 1 leverage ratio”).

Effective January 1, 2015, the final rulesheld by community banks, including applying higher risk weightings to certain commercial real estate loans.

The Basel III Capital Rules require the Bankbanks and bank holding companies to comply with the following minimum capital ratios: (i) a new common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0% of risk-weighted assets (increased from the prior requirement of 4.0%); (iii) a total capital ratio of 8.0% of risk-weighted assets (unchanged from the prior requirement); and (iv) a leverage ratio of 4.0% of total assets (unchanged from the prior requirement). These are the initial capital requirements, which are being phased-in over a four-year period. When fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, the rules will require the  Bank to maintain (i) a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 4.5%, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (which is added to the 4.5% common equity Tier 1 ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively(effectively resulting in a minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets of at least 7.0% upon full implementation),7%); (ii) a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 6.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 6.0% Tier 1 capital ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively(effectively resulting in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% upon full implementation),); (iii) a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, plus the 2.5% capital conservation buffer (which is added to the 8.0% total capital ratio as that buffer is phased-in, effectively(effectively resulting in a minimum total capital ratio of 10.5% upon full implementation),); and (iv) a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%4%, calculated as the ratio of Tier 1 capital to balance sheet exposures plus certain off-balance sheet exposures (computed as the average assets.


for each quarter of the month-end ratios for the quarter).  The phase-in of the capital conservation buffer requirement began on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, increasing by the same amount each year until it was fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. The capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress.  Banking institutionsorganizations with a ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets above the minimum but below the conservation buffer will face constraints on dividends, equity repurchases, and compensation based on the amount of the shortfall.

As of

In December 31, 2017, Tier 1 and total capital to risk-weighted assets ratiosthe Basel Committee published standards that it described as the finalization of the Bank were 11.4%Basel III post-crisis regulatory reforms (the standards are commonly referred to as “Basel IV”).  Among other things, these standards revise the standardized approach for credit risk (including by recalibrating risk weights and 12.4%, respectively, thus exceeding the minimum requirements. The common equity Tier 1 capital ratio and leverage ratio of the Bank were 11.4% and 9.2%, respectively, as of December 31, 2017, well above the minimum requirements. Based on management’s understanding and interpretation of theintroducing new capital requirements for certain “unconditionally cancellable commitments,” such as unused credit card lines of credit) and provide a new standardized approach for operational risk capital.  Under the proposed framework, these standards will generally be effective on January 1, 2022, with an aggregate output floor phasing-in through January 1, 2027.  Under the current capital rules, it believes that, asoperational risk capital requirements and a capital floor apply only to advanced approaches institutions, and not to the Company.  The impact of December 31, 2017,Basel IV on the Company and the Bank would meet all capital adequacy requirements under such ruleswill depend on a fully phased-in basis as if such requirements werethe manner in effect as of such date.


PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION. Federal banking regulators are authorized and, under certain circumstances, required to take certain actions against banks that fail to meet their capital requirements. Thewhich it is implemented by the federal bank regulatory agenciesagencies.

The Company meets the eligibility criteria of a small bank holding company in accordance with the Federal Reserve’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement (the “SBHC Policy Statement”). On August 28, 2018, the Federal Reserve issued an interim final rule required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018, which was signed into law on May 24, 2018 (the

6


Table of Contents

“EGRRCPA”), that expands the applicability of the SBHC Policy Statement to bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of less than $3 billion (up from the prior $1 billion threshold).  Under the SBHC Policy Statement, qualifying bank holding companies, such as the Company, have additional enforcement authority with respect to undercapitalized depository institutions. “Well capitalized” institutions may generally operate without supervisory restriction. With respect to “adequately capitalized” institutions, such banks cannot normally pay dividends or make any capital contributions that would leave it undercapitalized,flexibility in the amount of debt they cannot pay a management fee to a controlling person if, after payingcan issue and are also exempt from the fee, it would be undercapitalized, and they cannot accept, renew or roll over any brokered deposit unless the bank has applied for and been granted a waiver by the FDIC.


5

Immediately upon becoming “undercapitalized,” a depository institution is subjectBasel III Capital Rules.  The SBHC Policy Statement does not apply to the provisions ofBank and the Bank must comply with the Basel III Capital Rules.  The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the “prompt corrective action” regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, (“FDIA”), which: (i) restrict payment of capital distributions and management fees; (ii) require thatas described below.

On September 17, 2019, the appropriate federal banking agency monitoragencies jointly issued a final rule required by the conditionEGRRCPA that permits qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in consolidated assets to elect to be subject to a 9% leverage ratio that would be applied using less complex leverage calculations (commonly referred to as the community bank leverage ratio or “CBLR”). Under the rule, which became effective on January 1, 2020, banks and bank holding companies that opt into the CBLR framework and maintain a CBLR of greater than 9% are not subject to other risk-based and leverage capital requirements under the Basel III Capital Rules and would be deemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the “prompt corrective action” framework.  The CBLR will be available for banking organizations to use as of March 31, 2020 (with the flexibility for banking organizations to subsequently opt into or out of the institution and its effortsCBLR, as applicable). 

PROMPT CORRECTIVE ACTION. Federal banking agencies have broad powers under current federal law to restore its capital; (iii) require submission of a capital restoration plan; (iv) restrict the growth of the institution’s assets; and (v) require prior approval of certain expansion proposals. The appropriate federal banking agency for an undercapitalized institution also may take any number of discretionary supervisory actions if the agency determines that any of these actions is necessary to resolve the problems of the institution at the least possible long-term cost to the DIF, subject in certain cases to specified procedures. These discretionary supervisory actions include: (i) requiring the institution to raise additional capital; (ii) restricting transactions with affiliates; (iii) requiring divestiture of the institution or the sale of the institution to a willing purchaser; and (iv) any other supervisory action that the agency deems appropriate. These and additional mandatory and permissive supervisory actions may be taken with respect to significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized institutions.


The new capital requirement rules issued by the Federal Reserve incorporated new requirements into the prompt corrective action framework, pursuant to Section 38resolve problems of insured depository institutions. The extent of these powers depends upon whether the institution in question is “well capitalized,” “adequately capitalized,” “undercapitalized,” “significantly undercapitalized” or “critically undercapitalized.” These terms are defined under uniform regulations issued by each of the FDIA, byfederal banking agencies regulating these institutions. An insured depository institution which is less than adequately capitalized must adopt an acceptable capital restoration plan, is subject to increased regulatory oversight and is increasingly restricted in the scope of its permissible activities.

To be well capitalized under these regulations, a bank must have the following minimum capital ratios: (i) introducing a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio requirementof at each level (other than critically undercapitalized), with the required ratio beingleast 6.5% for well capitalized status;; (ii) increasing the minimuma Tier 1 capital ratio requirement for each category, with the minimum ratio for well-capitalized status being 8.0% (as compared to the priorrisk-weighted assets ratio of 6.0%)at least 8.0%; and (iii) eliminating the current provision that provides that a bank with a composite supervisory rating of 1 may have a 3.0% Tier 1 leverage ratio and still be well-capitalized. These new thresholds were effective for the Bank as of January 1, 2015. The minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (10.0%)of at least 10.0%; and minimum(iv) a leverage ratio (5.0%) for well-capitalized status were unchanged by the final rules. The Bank meets the definition of being “well capitalized” asat least 5.0%.  As of December 31, 2017.


The new capital requirements also include changes2020, the Bank was considered “well capitalized.”

As described above, on September 17, 2019, the federal banking agencies jointly issued a final rule required by the EGRRCPA that permits qualifying banks and bank holding companies that have less than $10 billion in the risk weights ofconsolidated assets to better reflect credit riskopt into the CBLR framework.  Banks opting into the CBLR framework and other risk exposures. These includemaintaining a 150% risk weight (up from 100%)CBLR of greater than 9% are deemed to have met the well capitalized ratio requirements under the “prompt corrective action” framework.The CBLR will be available for certain high volatility commercial real estate acquisition, development and construction loans and nonresidential mortgage loans that are 90 days past duebanking organizations to use as of March 31, 2020 (with the flexibility for banking organizations to subsequently opt into or otherwise on nonaccrual status, a 20% (up from 0%) credit conversion factor forout of the unused portion of a commitment with an original maturity of one year or less that is not unconditionally cancellable, a 250% risk weight (up from 100%) for mortgage servicing rights and deferred tax assets that are not deducted from capital, and increased risk-weights (from 0% to up to 600%) for equity exposures.


CBLR, as applicable). 

SOURCE OF STRENGTH. Federal Reserve policy has historically required bank holding companies to act as a source of financial and managerial strength to their subsidiary banks. The Dodd-Frank Act codified this policy as a statutory requirement. Under this requirement, the Company is expected to commit resources to support the Bank, including at times when the Company may not be in a financial position to provide such resources. Any capital loans by a bank holding company to any of its subsidiary banks are subordinate in right of payment to depositors and to certain other indebtedness of such subsidiary banks. In the event of a bank holding company’s bankruptcy, any commitment by the bank holding company to a federal bank regulatory agency to maintain the capital of a subsidiary bank will be assumed by the bankruptcy trustee and entitled to priority of payment.


FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF ATLANTA. The Bank is a member of the FHLB, which provides funding to their members for making housing loans as well as loans for affordable housing and community development lending. FHLB serves as a reserve or central bank for its members within its assigned region. It is funded primarily from proceeds derived from the sale of consolidated obligations of the FHLB system. It makes loans to its members (i.e., advances) in accordance with policies and procedures established by the Board of Directors of the FHLB. As a member, the Bank is required to purchase and maintain stock in the FHLB in an amount equal to at least 5% of the aggregate outstanding advances made by the FHLB to the Bank. In addition, the Bank is required to pledge collateral for outstanding advances. The borrowing agreement with the FHLB provides for the pledge by the Bank of various forms of securities and commercial and mortgage loans as collateral.


USA PATRIOT ACT. The USA PATRIOT Act became effective on October 26, 2001 and provides for the facilitation of information sharing among governmental entities and financial institutions for the purpose of combating terrorism and money laundering. Among other provisions, the USA PATRIOT Act permits financial institutions, upon providing notice to the United States Treasury, to share information with one another in order to better identify and report to the federal government concerning activities that may involve money laundering or terrorists’ activities. The USA PATRIOT Act is considered a significant banking law in terms of information disclosure regarding certain customer transactions. Certain

7


Table of Contents

provisions of the USA PATRIOT Act impose the obligation to establish anti-money laundering programs, including the development of a customer identification program, and the screening of all customers against any government lists of known or suspected terrorists. Although it does create a reporting obligation and a cost of compliance, the USA PATRIOT Act has not materially affected the Bank’s products, services, or other business activities.


OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL. The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) is responsible for administering and enforcing economic and trade sanctions against specified foreign parties, including countries and regimes, foreign individuals and other foreign organizations and entities. OFAC publishes lists of prohibited parties that are regularly consulted by the Company in the conduct of its business in order to assure compliance. The Company is responsible for, among other things, blocking accounts of, and transactions with, prohibited parties identified by OFAC, avoiding unlicensed trade and financial transactions with such parties and reporting blocked transactions after their occurrence. Failure to comply with OFAC requirements could have serious legal, financial and reputational consequences for the Company.


MORTGAGE BANKING REGULATION. The Bank’s mortgage banking activities are subject to the rules and regulations of, and examination by the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the Federal Housing Administration, the Department of Veterans Affairs and state regulatory authorities with respect to originating, processing and selling mortgage loans. Those rules and regulations, among other things, establish standards for loan origination, prohibit discrimination, provide for inspections and appraisals of property, require credit reports on prospective borrowers and, in some cases, restrict certain loan features, and fix maximum interest rates and fees. In addition to other federal laws, mortgage origination activities are subject to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, Truth-in-Lending Act, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act, Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, Home Ownership Equity Protection Act, S.A.F.E.the Secure and Fair Enforcement for Mortgage Licensing Act (S.A.F.E. Act), and the regulations promulgated under these acts. These laws prohibit discrimination, require the disclosure of certain basic information to mortgagors concerning credit and settlement costs, limit payment for settlement services to the reasonable value of the services rendered and require the maintenance and disclosure of information regarding the disposition of mortgage applications based on race, gender, geographical distribution and income level.


6

CONSUMER LAWS AND REGULATIONS. The Bank is subject to certain consumer laws and regulations that are designed to protect consumers in transactions with banks. While the list set forth herein is not exhaustive, these laws and regulations include the Truth-in-Lending Act, the Truth-in-Savings Act, the Electronic Funds Transfer Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Fair Housing Act, and regulations issued under such acts, among others. These laws and regulations mandate certain disclosure requirements and regulate the manner in which financial institutions must deal with customers when taking deposits, making loans to or engaging in other types of transactions with such customers.


The Dodd-Frank Act centralized responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”), and giving it responsibility for implementing, examining, and enforcing compliance with federal consumer protection laws. The CFPB focuses on (i) risks to consumers and compliance with the federal consumer financial laws, (ii) the markets in which firms operate and risks to consumers posed by activities in those markets, (iii) depository institutions that offer a wide variety of consumer financial products and services, and (iv) non-depository companies that offer one or more consumer financial products or services.


The CFPB has broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer financial laws that apply to all banks, including, among other things, the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. Abusive acts or practices are defined as those that materially interfere with a consumer’s ability to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or service or take unreasonable advantage of a consumer’s (i) lack of financial savvy, (ii) inability to protect himself in the selection or use of consumer financial products or services, or (iii) reasonable reliance on a covered entity to act in the consumer’s interests. The CFPB can issue cease-and-desist orders against banks and other entities that violate consumer financial laws. The CFPB may also institute a civil action against an entity in violation of federal consumer financial law in order to impose a civil penalty or injunction.Further, regulatory positions taken by the CFPB may influence how other regulatory agencies apply the subject consumer financial protection laws and regulations.


LOANS TO INSIDERS. The Federal Reserve Act and related regulations impose specific restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of banks. Under Section 22(h) of the Federal Reserve Act, loans to a director, an executive officer and to a principal shareholder of a bank, and some affiliated entities of any of the foregoing, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such person and affiliated entities, the bank’s loan-to-one borrower limit. Loans in the aggregate to insiders and their related interests as a class may not exceed the Bank’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Section 22(h) also prohibits loans, above amounts prescribed by the appropriate federal banking agency, to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of a bank or bank holding company, and their respective affiliates, unless such loan is approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the bank with any “interested” director not participating in the voting. The FDIC has prescribed the loan amount, which includes all other outstanding loans to such person, as to which such prior board of director approval is required, as being the greater of $25,000 or 5% of capital and surplus (up to $500,000). Section 22(h) requires that loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders be made on terms and underwriting standards substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons.

ABILITY-TO-REPAY AND QUALIFIED MORTGAGE RULE. PursuantThe Dodd-Frank Act authorized the CFPB to establish certain minimum standards for the origination of residential mortgages, including a determination of the borrower's ability-to-repay, and allows borrowers to raise certain defenses to foreclosure if they receive any loan other than a “qualified mortgage” as defined by the Dodd-Frank Act theand CFPB issued a final rule effective January 10, 2014, amending Regulation Z as implemented by the Truth-in-Lending Act, requiring mortgage lenders to make a reasonable and good faith determination based on verified and documented information that a consumer applying for a mortgage loan has a reasonable ability to repay the loan according to its terms. Mortgage lenders are required to determine consumers’ ability to repay in one of two ways. The first alternative requires the mortgage lender to consider the following eight underwriting factors when making the credit decision: (i) current or reasonably expected income or assets; (ii) current employment status; (iii) the monthly payment on the covered transaction; (iv) the monthly payment on any simultaneous loan; (v) the monthly payment for mortgage-related obligations; (vi) current debt obligations, alimony, and child support; (vii) the monthly debt-to-income ratio or residual income; and (viii) credit history. Alternatively, the mortgage lender can originate “qualified mortgages,” which are entitled to a presumption that the creditor making the loan satisfied the ability-to-repay requirements.regulations. In general, a “qualified mortgage” is a mortgage loan without negative amortization, interest-only payments, balloon payments, or terms exceeding 30 years. In addition, to be a qualified mortgage the points and fees paid by a consumer cannot exceed 3% of the total loan amount. Qualified mortgages that are “higher-priced” (e.g. subprime loans) garner a rebuttable presumption of compliance with the ability-to-repay rules, while qualified mortgages that are not “higher-priced” (e.g. prime loans) are given a safe harbor of compliance. The Company is predominantly an originator of compliant qualified mortgages.


LOANS TO INSIDERS. The Federal Reserve Act and related regulations impose specific restrictions on loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders of banks. Specifically, loans to a director, an executive officer and to a principal shareholder of a bank, and some affiliated entities of any of the foregoing, may not exceed, together with all other outstanding loans to such person and affiliated

8


Table of Contents

entities, the bank’s loan-to-one borrower limit. Loans in the aggregate to insiders and their related interests as a class may not exceed the Bank’s unimpaired capital and unimpaired surplus. Loans exceeding these amounts are prohibited, unless such loan is approved in advance by a majority of the board of directors of the bank with any “interested” director not participating in the voting. The FDIC has prescribed the loan amount, which includes all other outstanding loans to such person, as to which such prior board of director approval is required, as being the greater of $25,000 or 5% of capital and surplus (up to $500,000). Loans to directors, executive officers and principal shareholders are required to be made on terms and underwriting standards substantially the same as offered in comparable transactions to other persons.

CYBERSECURITY. In March 2015,Federal banking agencies have adopted guidelines for establishing information security standards and cybersecurity programs for implementing safeguards under the supervision of a financial institution’s board of directors. These guidelines, along with related regulatory materials, increasingly focus on risk management and processes related to information technology and the use of third-parties in the provision of financial products and services. The federal regulators issued two related statements regarding cybersecurity. One statement indicates thatbanking agencies expect financial institutions should design multiple layers of security controls to establish lines of defense and to ensure that their risk management processes also address the risk posed by compromised customer credentials, including security measures to reliably authenticate customers accessing internet-based services of theand also expect financial institution. The other statement indicates that a financial institution’s management is expectedinstitutions to maintain sufficient business continuity planning processes to ensure the rapid recovery, resumption and maintenance of the institution’s operations after a cyber-attack involving destructive malware. A financial institution is also expected to develop appropriate processes to enable recovery of data and business operations and address rebuilding network capabilities and restoring data if the institution or its critical service providers fall victim to this type of cyber-attack. If the Companyfinancial institution fails to observemeet the expectations set forth in this regulatory guidance, itthe institution could be subject to various regulatory sanctions,actions, including financial penalties. To date, the Company has not experienced apenalties, and any remediation efforts may require significant compromise, significant data loss or any material financial losses related to cybersecurity attacks, but its systems and those of its customers and third-party service providers are under constant threat and it is possible that the Company could experience a significant event in the future. Risks and exposures related to cybersecurity attacks are expected to remain high for the foreseeable future due to the rapidly evolving nature and sophistication of these threats, as well as due to the expanding use of Internet banking, mobile banking and other technology-based products and services by the Company and its customers.


resources.

INCENTIVE COMPENSATION. In June 2010, the federalFederal bank regulatory agencies issued comprehensive final guidance on incentive compensation policies intended to ensure that the incentive compensation policies of financial institutionsbanking organizations do not undermine the safety and soundness of such institutionsorganizations by encouraging excessive risk-taking. The Interagency Guidance on Sound Incentive Compensation Policies, which covers all employees that have the ability to materially affect the risk profile of a financial institutions, either individually or as part of a group, is based upon the key principles that a financial institution’s incentive compensation arrangements should (i) provide incentives that do not encourage risk-taking beyond the institution’s ability to effectively identify and manage risks, (ii) be compatible with effective internal controls and risk management, and (iii) be supported by strong corporate governance, including active and effective oversight by the financial institution’s board of directors.


7

The Federal Reserve will review, as part of the regular, risk-focused examination process, the incentive compensation arrangements of financial institutions,banking organizations, such as the Bank, that are not “large, complex banking organizations.” These reviews will be tailored to each financial institution based on the scope and complexity of the institution’s activities and the prevalence of incentive compensation arrangements. The findings of the supervisory initiatives will be included in reports of examination. Deficienciesexamination, and deficiencies will be incorporated into the institution’sorganization’s supervisory ratings, which can affect the institution’s ability to make acquisitions and take other actions.ratings. Enforcement actions may be taken against a financial institutionbanking organization if its incentive compensation arrangements, or related risk-management control or governance processes, pose a risk to the institution’sorganization’s safety and soundness and the financial institutionorganization is not taking prompt and effective measures to correct the deficiencies. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company is not aware of any instances of non-compliancenoncompliance with the guidance.
TAX REFORM. On

COVID-19 RELATED REGULATORY RELIEF. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, federal banking agencies issued a joint statement on March 22, 2020 encouraging banking institutions to work with borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including offering short-term loan modifications to borrowers unable to meet their contractual payment obligations.  Under this interagency guidance, certain loans that have been modified are exempt from being reported as past due or as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”).  Further, the CARES Act provided additional exemptions from TDR reporting for certain loans that have been modified for reasons related to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Regulatory agencies also issued an interim final rule on April 7, 2020 which provides relief in bank regulatory capital requirements that allow loans originated under the PPP to be excluded from risk-weighted assets, and to be excluded from total assets for purposes of bank leverage ratio requirements if they are pledged as collateral to the PPPLF.

Congress also enacted the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, on December 22, 2017,27, 2020, which included (i) the President ofEconomic Aid to Hard-Hit Small Businesses, Non-profits, and Venues Act, (ii) the United States signed into law theCOVID-Related Tax Cuts and JobsRelief Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”).  The legislation made key changes2020, and (iii) the Taxpayer Certainty and Disability Relief Act of 2020. These laws include significant clarifications and modifications to PPP, which had terminated on August 8, 2020. In particular, Congress revived the U.S. tax law, including the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018.PPP and allocated an additional $284.45 billion in PPP funds for 2021. As a result, of the reduction in the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35%SBA has modified prior guidance and promulgated new regulations and guidance to 21% under the Tax Act, the Company revalued its ending net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2017conform with and recognized a provisional $1.7 million tax expense in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2017.  The Company is still analyzing certain aspects ofimplement the new lawprovisions during the first quarter of 2021. As a participating PPP lender, the Bank continues to monitor legislative, regulatory, and refining its calculations, which could affect the measurement of these assets and liabilities or give rise to new deferred tax amounts.  The accounting is expected to be complete when the 2017 U.S. corporate income tax return is filed in 2018.


supervisory developments related thereto.

FUTURE REGULATORY UNCERTAINTY. Congress may enact legislation from time to time that affects the regulation of the financial services industry, and state legislatures may enact legislation from time to time affecting the regulation of financial institutions chartered by or operating in those states. Federal and state regulatory agencies also periodically propose and adopt changes to their regulations or change the manner in which existing regulations are applied. The substance or impact of pending or future legislation or regulation, or the application thereof, cannot be predicted, although enactment of the proposed legislation could impact the regulatory structure under which the Company and the Bank operate and may significantly increase costs, impede the efficiency of internal business processes, require an increase in regulatory capital, require modifications to business strategy, and limit the ability to pursue business opportunities in an efficient manner. A change in statutes, regulations or regulatory policies applicable to the Company or the Bank could have a material, adverse effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of the Company and the Bank.



9


Table of Contents

COMPETITION

The Company encounters strong competition both in making loans and in attracting deposits. In one or more aspects of its business, the Bank competes with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, finance companies, mutual funds, insurance companies, brokerage and investment banking companies, financial technology (“fintech”) companies, and other financial intermediaries. Most of these competitors, some of which are affiliated with bank holding companies, have substantially greater resources and lending limits, and may offer certain services that the Bank does not currently provide. In addition, many of the Bank’s non-banknonbank competitors are not subject to the same level of federal regulation that governs bank holding companies and federally insured banks. Recent federal and state legislation has heightened the competitive environment in which financial institutions must conduct their business, and the potential for competition among financial institutions of all types has increased significantly. To compete, the Bank relies upon specialized services, responsive handling of customer needs, and personal contacts by its officers, directors, and staff. Large multi-branch banking institutions tend to compete based primarily on price and the number and location of branches while smaller independent financial institutions, like the Company, tend to compete primarily on price and personal service.

EMPLOYEES

As of December 31, 2017,2020, the Company and the Bank employed 150approximately 140 full-time equivalent employees. No employee is represented by a collective bargaining unit. The Company and the Bank consider relations with employees to be good.

The Company is a small community bank and customer service is an important differentiator. The Company’s senior officers have personal relationships with many of the Company’s key customers, and attracting and retaining these senior officers is critical to the Company’s success. The Company’s compensation programs encourage performance consistent with strategic and business plans approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, while ensuring that the financial costs of current or proposed compensation and benefits are reasonable and consistent with industry standards and shareholders’ interests. See “PART III – ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the types of plans and programs that Fauquier maintains for its senior officers.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

The Company files annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. The Company’s SEC filings are filed electronically and are available to the public over the internet at the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, any document filed by the Company with the SEC can be read and copied at the SEC’s public reference facilities at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of documents can be obtained at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.  The Company’s website is http:https://www.tfb.bank. The Company makes its SEC filings available free of charge through this website under “About Us” “Investor Relations,” “Financial Information” “Documents” as soon as practicable after filing or furnishing the material to the SEC. Copies of documents can also be obtained free of charge by writing to the Company's secretary at 10 Courthouse Square, Warrenton, Virginia 20186 or by calling 800-638-3798. The information on the Company’s website is not incorporated into this report or any other filing the Company makes with the SEC.


The Company’s transfer agent and registrar is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC and can be contacted by writing to 6201 15th Avenue, Brooklyn, New York 11209 or by phone 800-937-5449. Their website is www.amstock.comwww.astfinancial.com.



10


Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in the Company’s securities involves risks and uncertainties.  In addition to the other information contained in this report, including the information addressed under “Forward-Looking Statements,” investors in the Company’s securities should carefully consider the factors discussed below.  These factors could materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, and capital position and could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from its historical results or the results contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this report, in which case the trading price of the Company’s securities could decline.

Risk Factors Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The economic impact of the COVID-19 outbreak could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic. On March 12, 2020, the former President of the United States declared the COVID-19 outbreak in the United States a national emergency. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant economic dislocation in the United States as many state and local governments ordered non-essential businesses to close and residents to shelter in place at home. This has resulted in an unprecedented slow-down in economic activity and a related increase in unemployment. In response to the COVID-19 outbreak, the Federal Reserve has reduced the benchmark federal funds rate to a target range of 0% to 0.25%, and the yields on 10 and 30-year treasury notes have declined to historic lows. Various state governments and federal agencies are encouraging, or in some cases requiring, lenders to provide forbearance and other relief to borrowers (e.g., waiving late payment and other fees). The federal banking agencies have encouraged financial institutions to prudently work with affected borrowers through the issuance of an interagency statement, and federal legislation has provided relief from reporting loan classifications due to modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Certain industries have been particularly hard-hit, including the travel and hospitality industry, the restaurant industry and the retail industry. Finally, the spread of COVID-19 has caused the Company to modify business practices, including branch operations, employee travel, employee work locations, and cancellation of physical participation in meetings, events and conferences.The Company may take further actions as may be required by government authorities or that we determine are in the best interests of our employees, clients and business partners.

Given the ongoing and dynamic nature of the circumstances, it is difficult to predict the full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on the Company or its business. The extent of such impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain, including when the coronavirus can be controlled and abated and when and how the economy may be reopened.

As the result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the related adverse local and national economic consequences, the Company could be subject to any of the following risks, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity, and results of operations:

demand for products and services may decline, making it difficult to grow assets and income;

Not applicable

if the economy is unable to substantially reopen, and high levels of unemployment continue for an extended period of time, loan delinquencies, problem assets, and foreclosures may increase, resulting in increased charges, additions to the allowance for loan losses, and reduced income, among other impacts;

collateral for loans, especially real estate, may decline in value, which could cause loan losses to increase;

the allowance for loan losses may have to be increased if borrowers experience financial difficulties beyond forbearance periods, which will adversely affect net income;

the net worth and liquidity of loan guarantors may decline, impairing their ability to honor commitments;

as the result of the decline in the Federal Reserve’s target federal funds rate, the yield on the Company’s assets may decline to a greater extent than the decline in its cost of interest-bearing liabilities, reducing its net interest margin and spread and reducing net income;

a material decrease in net income or a net loss over several quarters could result in a decrease in the rate of the Company’s quarterly cash dividend;

the Company’s wealth management and trust revenues may decline with continuing market turmoil;

the Company relies on third party vendors for certain services and the unavailability of a critical service due to the COVID-19 outbreak could have an adverse effect the Company and its operations; and

FDIC premiums may increase if the agency experiences additional resolution costs.

Moreover, the Company’s future success and profitability substantially depends on the management skills of our executive officers. The unanticipated loss or unavailability of key employees due to the outbreak could harm our ability to operate the Company’s business or

11


Table of Contents

execute its business strategy. The Company may not be successful in finding and integrating suitable successors in the event of key employee loss or unavailability.

Any one or a combination of the factors identified above could negatively impact the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations and prospects.

As a participating lender in the PPP, the Company and the Bank are subject to additional risks of litigation from the Bank’s clients or other parties regarding the Bank’s processing of loans for the PPP and risks that the SBA may not fund some or all PPP loan guaranties.

On March 27, 2020, the former President of the United States signed the CARES Act, which included a $349 billion loan program administered through the SBA referred to as the PPP. Under the PPP, small businesses and other entities and individuals can apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enroll in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria. The Bank is participating as a lender in the PPP. There continues to be some ambiguity in the laws, regulations and administrative guidance related to the PPP.  In addition, since the opening of the PPP, several large banks have been subject to litigation regarding the process and procedures that such banks used in processing applications for the PPP. The Company and the Bank may be exposed to the risk of similar litigation, from both clients and non-clients that approached the Bank regarding PPP loans, regarding its process and procedures used in processing applications for the PPP. If any such litigation is filed against the Company or the Bank and is not resolved in a manner favorable to the Company or the Bank, it may result in significant financial liability or adversely affect the Company’s reputation. In addition, litigation can be costly, regardless of outcome. Any financial liability, litigation costs or reputational damage caused by PPP related litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Bank also has credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded, or serviced by the Bank, such as an issue with the eligibility of a borrower to receive a PPP loan, which may or may not be related to the ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP. In the event of a loss resulting from a default on a PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which the PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced by the Bank, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from the Company or the Bank.

Risk Factors Related to the Merger Agreement with Virginia National

Combining Virginia National and the Company may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected.

The success of the Merger will depend, in part, on Virginia National’s ability after the Merger to realize the anticipated benefits and cost savings from combining the businesses of Virginia National and the Company and to combine the businesses of Virginia National and the Company in a manner that permits growth opportunities and cost savings to be realized without materially disrupting the existing customer relationships of the Company or decreasing revenues due to loss of customers. If Virginia National is not able to achieve these objectives, the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Merger may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.

Virginia National and the Company have operated, and, until the completion of the Merger, will continue to operate, independently. To realize these anticipated benefits of the Merger, after the completion of the Merger, Virginia National expects to integrate the Company’s business into its own. The integration process in the Merger could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of each party’s ongoing business, inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that affect adversely either party’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or achieve the anticipated benefits of the Merger. The loss of key employees could adversely affect Virginia National’s ability to successfully conduct its business in the markets in which the Company now operates, which could have an adverse effect on Virginia National’s financial results and the value of its common stock. If Virginia National experiences difficulties with the integration process, the anticipated benefits of the Merger may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected. As with any merger of financial institutions, there also may be disruptions that cause Virginia National and the Company to lose customers or cause customers to withdraw their deposits from the Company’s or Virginia National’s banking subsidiaries, or other unintended consequences that could have a material adverse effect on Virginia National’s results of operations or financial condition after the Merger. These integration matters could have an adverse effect on the Company during this transition period and on Virginia National for an undetermined period after consummation of the Merger.

Because the market price of Virginia National common stock will fluctuate, the value of the consideration to be received by the Company’s shareholders in the Merger may change.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, each share of the Company’s common stock, except for certain shares of the Company’s common stock owned by the Company or Virginia National, that is issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger

12


Table of Contents

will be converted into the right to receive 0.6750 shares of common stock of Virginia National.  The closing price of Virginia National common stock on the date that the Merger is completed may vary from the closing price of Virginia National common stock on the date the Company and Virginia National announced the signing of the Merger Agreement. Because the Merger consideration is determined by a fixed exchange ratio, at the time of the Company’s special meeting, the Company’s shareholders will not know or be able to calculate the value of the shares of Virginia National common stock they will receive upon completion of the Merger. Any change in the market price of Virginia National common stock prior to completion of the Merger may affect the value of the Merger consideration that the Company’s shareholders will receive upon completion of the Merger. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors, including general market and economic conditions, changes in the companies’ respective businesses, operations and prospects, and regulatory considerations, among other things. Many of these factors are beyond the control of the Company and Virginia National. The Company’s shareholders should obtain current market quotations for shares of Virginia National common stock and the Company’s common stock before voting their shares at the Company’s special meeting of shareholders.

The Merger may distract management of the Company from its other responsibilities.

The Merger could cause the management of the Company to focus its time and energies on matters related to the Merger that otherwise would be directed to its business and operations. Any such distraction on the part of the Company’s management, if significant, could affect its ability to service existing business and develop new business and may adversely affect the business and earnings of the Company before the Merger, or the business and earnings of Virginia National after the Merger.

Termination of the Merger Agreement could negatively impact the Company.

Each of the Company’s and Virginia National’s obligation to consummate the Merger remains subject to a number of conditions, and there can be no assurance that all of the conditions will be satisfied, or that the Merger will be completed on the proposed terms, within the expected timeframe, or at all. Any delay in completing the Merger could cause the Company not to realize some or all of the benefits that the Company expects to achieve if the Merger is successfully completed within its expected timeframe. If the Merger Agreement is terminated, the Company’s business may be impacted adversely by the failure to pursue other beneficial opportunities due to the focus of management on the Merger, without realizing any of the anticipated benefits of completing the Merger. Additionally, if the Merger Agreement is terminated, the market price of the Company’s common stock could decline to the extent that the current market prices reflect a market assumption that the Merger will be completed. If the Merger Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, including circumstances involving a change in recommendation by the Company's board of directors, the Company may be required to pay to Virginia National a termination fee of $2.5 million.

In addition, the Company has incurred and will incur substantial expenses in connection with the negotiation and completion of the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement. If the Merger is not completed, the Company would have to recognize these expenses and would have committed substantial time and resources by management, without realizing the expected benefits of the Merger. In addition, failure to consummate the Merger also may result in negative reactions from the financial markets or from the Company’s customers, vendors and employees. If the Merger is not completed, these risks may materialize and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s stock price, business and cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

The Merger Agreement limits the ability of the Company to pursue alternatives to the Merger.

The Merger Agreement contains “no-shop” provisions that, subject to limited exceptions, limits the ability of the Company to discuss, facilitate or commit to competing third-party proposals to acquire all or a significant part of the Company. In addition, under certain circumstances, if the Merger Agreement is terminated and the Company, subject to certain restrictions, consummates a similar transaction other than the Merger, the Company must pay to Virginia National a fee of $2.5 million. These provisions might discourage a potential competing acquiror that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of the Company from considering or proposing the acquisition even if it were prepared to pay consideration, with respect to the Company, with a higher per share market price than that proposed in the Merger.

The Company will be subject to business uncertainties and contractual restrictions while the Merger is pending.

Uncertainty about the effect of the Merger on employees and customers may have an adverse effect on the Company. These uncertainties may impair the Company’s ability to attract, retain and motivate key personnel until the Merger is completed, and could cause customers and others that deal with the Company to seek to change existing business relationships with the Company. Retention of certain employees by the Company may be challenging while the Merger is pending, as certain employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the Company or the combined company following the Merger. If key employees depart because of issues relating to the uncertainty and difficulty of integration or a desire not to remain with the Company or the combined company following the Merger, the Company’s business, or the business of the combined company following the Merger, could be harmed. In addition, the Company has agreed to operate its business in the ordinary course prior to the closing of the Merger and from taking certain specified actions until the

13


Table of Contents

Merger occurs, and the Merger Agreement restricts the Company from taking other specified actions until the merger occurs without the consent of Virginia National. These restrictions may prevent the Company from pursuing attractive business opportunities that may arise prior to the completion of the merger.

Risk Factors Related to the Company’s Lending Activities

The Company’s business is subject to various lending and other economic risks that could adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s business is directly affected by general economic and market conditions; broad trends in industry and finance; legislative and regulatory changes; changes in governmental monetary and fiscal policies; and inflation, all of which are beyond the Company’s control. A deterioration in economic conditions, in particular a prolonged economic slowdown within the Company’s geographic region, could result in the following consequences which could adversely affect the Company’s business: an increase in loan delinquencies; an increase in problem assets and foreclosures; a decline in demand for products and services; and a deterioration in the value of collateral for loans.

The Company’s focus on lending to small to mid-sized community-based businesses may increase its credit risk.

Most of the Company’s commercial business and commercial real estate loans are made to small business or middle market customers.  These businesses generally have fewer financial resources in terms of capital or borrowing capacity than larger entities and have a heightened vulnerability to economic conditions.  Additionally, these loans may increase concentration risk as to industry or collateral securing the loans.  If general economic conditions in the market areas in which the Company operates negatively impact this important customer sector, the Company’s results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.  Moreover, a portion of these loans have been made by the Company in recent years and the borrowers may not have experienced a complete business or economic cycle.  The deterioration of the borrowers’ businesses may hinder their ability to repay their loans with the Company, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company’s credit standards and on-going credit assessment processes might not protect it from significant credit losses.

The Company takes credit risk by virtue of making loans and extending loan commitments and letters of credit. Credit risk is managed through a program of underwriting standards, the review of certain credit decisions and an ongoing process of assessment of the quality of the credit already extended. In addition, the Company’s credit administration function employs risk management techniques intended to promptly identify problem loans. While these procedures are designed to provide the Company with the information needed to implement policy adjustments where necessary and to take appropriate corrective actions, there can be no assurance that such measures will be effective in avoiding future undue credit risk, and credit losses may occur in the future.

If the Company’s allowance for loan losses becomes inadequate, its financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

Making loans is an essential element of the Company’s business. The risk of nonpayment is affected by a number of factors, including but not limited to: the duration of the credit; credit risks of a particular customer; changes in economic and industry conditions; and, in the case of a collateralized loan, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the collateral. Although the Company seeks to mitigate risks inherent in lending by adhering to specific underwriting practices, loans may not be repaid. The Company attempts to maintain an appropriate allowance for loan losses to provide for losses in the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is determined by analyzing numerous factors about the loan portfolio including historical loan losses for relevant periods of time, current trends in delinquencies and charge-offs, current economic conditions that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay and the value of collateral, changes in the size and composition of the loan portfolio and industry information. Also included are qualitative considerations with respect to the effect of potential economic events, the outcomes of which are uncertain.

Because any estimate of loan losses is subjective and the accuracy depends on the outcome of future events, charge-offs in future periods may exceed the allowance for loan losses and additional increases in the allowance for loan losses may be required. Additions to the allowance for loan losses would result in a decrease of profitability. Although management believes the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb losses that are inherent in the loan portfolio, the Company cannot predict such losses or that the allowance will be adequate in the future.

In addition, the adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, as amended, could result in an increase in the allowance for loan losses as a result of changing from an “incurred loss” model, which encompasses allowances for current known and inherent losses within the portfolio, to an “expected loss” model, which encompasses allowances for losses expected to be incurred over the life of the portfolio. As a smaller reporting company, the Company has elected to defer adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 until January 1, 2023.  

14


Table of Contents

For information regarding recent accounting pronouncements and their effect on the Company, see “Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Other Regulatory Statements” in Note 1 “Nature of Banking Activities and Significant Accounting Policies” in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in Item 8 of this Form 10 K. Any increases in the allowance for loan losses will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly capital, and may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Nonperforming assets take significant time to resolve and adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Nonperforming assets adversely affect net income in various ways. The Company does not record interest income on nonaccruing loans, which adversely affects income and increases credit administration costs. When the Company receives collateral through foreclosures and similar proceedings, it is required to mark the related loan to the then fair market value of the collateral less estimated selling costs, which may result in a loss. An increased level of nonperforming assets also increases the Company’s risk profile and may impact the capital levels regulators believe are appropriate in light of such risks. The Company utilizes various techniques such as workouts, restructurings and loan sales to manage problem assets. Increases in, or negative adjustments in, the value of these problem assets, the underlying collateral, or in the borrowers’ performance or financial condition, could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the resolution of nonperforming assets requires significant commitments of time from management and staff, which can be detrimental to the performance of their other responsibilities, including generation of new loans. There can be no assurance that the Company will avoid increases in nonperforming assets in the future.

The Company’s real estate lending business can result in increased costs associated with other real estate owned (“OREO”).  

Because the Company originates loans secured by real estate, the Company may have to foreclose on the collateral property and may thereafter own and operate such property.  The amount that may be realized after a default is dependent upon factors outside of the Company’s control, including, but not limited to, general or local economic conditions, environmental cleanup liability, neighborhood values, interest rates, real estate tax rates, operating expenses of the mortgaged properties, and supply of and demand for properties. Certain expenditures associated with the ownership of income-producing real estate, principally real estate taxes and maintenance costs, may adversely affect the net cash flows generated by the real estate. Therefore, the cost of operating income-producing real property may exceed the rental income earned, if any, from such property, and the Company may have to advance funds in order to protect its investment or may be required to dispose of the real property at a loss.

Risks Related to the Company’s Business, Industry and Markets

Adverse changes in economic conditions in the Company’s market areas or adverse conditions in industries on which such markets are dependent could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company provides full service banking and other financial services in Fauquier and Prince William counties in Virginia. The Company’s loan and deposit activities are directly affected by economic conditions within these markets, as well as conditions in the industries on which those markets are economically dependent. A deterioration in local economic conditions or in the condition of an industry on which a local market depends could adversely affect such factors as unemployment rates, business formations and expansions, and housing market conditions. Adverse developments in any of these factors could result in, among other things, a decline in loan demand, a reduction in the number of creditworthy borrowers seeking loans, an increase in delinquencies, defaults and foreclosures, an increase in classified and nonaccrual loans, a decrease in the value of loan collateral, and a decline in the financial condition of borrowers and guarantors, any of which could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Competition from other financial institutions and financial intermediaries may adversely affect the Company’s profitability.

The Company faces competition in originating loans and in attracting deposits principally from other banks, mortgage banking companies, consumer finance companies, savings associations, credit unions, brokerage firms, insurance companies, fintech companies and other institutional lenders and purchasers of loans.  Advancements in technology and other changes have lowered barriers to entry and made it possible for non-banks to offer products and services traditionally provided by banks. In particular, the activity of fintech companies has grown significantly over recent years and is expected to continue to grow. Fintech companies have and may continue to offer bank or bank-like products and some fintech companies have applied for bank charters. Other fintech companies have partnered with existing banks to allow them to offer deposit products to their customers. Additionally, banks and other financial institutions with larger capitalization and financial intermediaries not subject to bank regulatory restrictions have larger lending limits and are thereby able to serve the credit needs of larger clients. These institutions may be able to offer the same loan products and services that the Company offers at more competitive rates and prices. Increased competition could require the Company to increase the rates paid on deposits or lower the rates offered on loans, which could adversely affect profitability.

15


Table of Contents

Weakness in the secondary residential mortgage loan markets will adversely affect noninterest income.

One of the components of the Company’s strategic plan is to generate noninterest income from loans originated for sale into the secondary market.  Interest rates, low housing inventory, cash buyers, new mortgage lending regulations and other market conditions could have an adverse effect on loan originations across the industry which would reduce our noninterest income.

The Company relies on deposits obtained from customers in the Company’s market area to provide liquidity and to support growth.

The Company’s business strategies are based on access to funding from local customer deposits. Deposit levels may be affected by a number of factors, including interest rates paid by competitors, general interest rate levels, returns available to customers on alternative investments and general economic conditions. If deposit levels fall, the Company could lose a relatively low-cost source of funding and interest expense would likely increase as alternative funding to replace lost deposits may be necessary. If local customer deposits are not sufficient to fund the Company’s normal operations and growth, the Company will look to outside sources, such as borrowings from the FHLB, which is a secured funding source. The Company’s ability to access borrowings from the FHLB will be dependent upon whether and the extent to which collateral to secure FHLB borrowings can be provided. The Company may also look to federal funds purchased and brokered deposits.  The Company may also seek to raise funds through the issuance of shares of its common stock, or other equity or equity-related securities, or debt securities including subordinated notes as additional sources of liquidity. If the Company is unable to access funding sufficient to support business operations and growth strategies or is only able to access such funding on unattractive terms, the Company may not be able to implement its business strategies which may negatively affect financial performance.

Risk Factors Related to the Company’s Operations and Technology

The Company relies on dividends from the Bank for substantially all of its revenue.

The Company is a bank holding company that conducts substantially all of its operations through the Bank. As a result, the Company relies on dividends from the Bank for substantially all of its revenues. There are various regulatory restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends or make other payments to the Company, and the Company’s right to participate in a distribution of assets upon the Bank’s liquidation or reorganization is subject to the prior claims of the Bank’s creditors. If the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Company, the Company may not be able to service its outstanding borrowings and other debt, pay its other obligations or pay a cash dividend to the holders of the Company’s common stock, and the Company’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. Further, although the Company has historically paid cash dividends to holders of its common stock, these holders are not entitled to receive dividends and regulatory or economic factors may cause the Company’s Board of Directors to consider, among other actions, the reduction of dividends paid on the Company’s common stock even if the Bank continues to pay dividends to the Company.

The Company’s risk management framework may not be effective in mitigating risk and loss.

The Company maintains an enterprise risk management program that is designed to identify, quantify, monitor, report and control the risks it faces including, but not limited to, interest rate, credit, liquidity, operational, reputation, legal, compliance, economic and litigation risk. Although the risk management program is assessed on an ongoing basis, the Company gives no assurance that the risk management framework and related controls will effectively mitigate the risks listed above or limit losses that may occur. If the Company’s risk management program or controls do not function effectively, the Company’s financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

The Company’s operations may be adversely affected by cybersecurity risks.

In the ordinary course of business, the Company collects and stores sensitive data, including proprietary business information and personally identifiable information of its customers and employees in systems and on networks. The secure processing, maintenance, and use of this information is critical to operations and the Company’s business strategy. The Company has invested in accepted technologies, and continually reviews processes and practices that are designed to protect its networks, computers, and data from damage or unauthorized access. Despite these security measures, the Company’s computer systems and infrastructure may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. A breach of any kind could compromise systems and the information stored there could be accessed, damaged or disclosed. A breach in security could result in legal claims, regulatory penalties, disruption in operations, and damage to the Company’s reputation, which could adversely affect its business and financial condition. Furthermore, as cyber threats continue to evolve and increase, the Company may be required to expend significant additional financial and operational resources to modify or enhance its protective measures, or to investigate and remediate any identified information security vulnerabilities.

In addition, multiple major U.S. retailers have experienced data systems incursions reportedly resulting in the thefts of credit and debit card information, online account information and other financial or privileged data. Retailer incursions affect cards issued and deposit

16


Table of Contents

accounts maintained by many banks, including the Bank. Although the Company’s systems are not breached in retailer incursions, these events can cause it to reissue a significant number of cards and take other costly steps to avoid significant theft loss to the Company and its customers. In some cases, the Company may be required to reimburse customers for the losses they incur. Other possible points of intrusion or disruption not within the Company’s control include internet service providers, electronic mail portal providers, social media portals, distant-server (cloud) service providers, electronic data security providers, telecommunications companies, and smart phone manufacturers.  Additionally, in recent years banking regulators have focused on the responsibilities of financial institutions to supervise vendors and other third-party service providers.  The Company may have to dedicate significant resources to manage risks and regulatory burdens, including the Company’s data processing and cybersecurity service providers.

Furthermore, because some of our employees are working remotely from their homes due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is an increased risk of disruption to our operations because they are utilizing residential networks and infrastructure which may not be as secure as in our office environment.

Business counterparties, over which the Company may have limited or no control, may experience disruptions that could adversely affect the Company.

Multiple major U.S. retailers and a major consumer credit reporting agency have experienced data systems incursions in recent years reportedly resulting in the thefts of credit and debit card information, online account information, and other personal and financial data of hundreds of millions of individuals.  Retailer incursions may affect debit cards issued and deposit accounts maintained by many banks.  Although the Company is not aware of any instance in which the Bank’s systems have been breached in a retailer incursion, these events can cause the Bank to reissue a significant number of cards and take other costly steps to avoid significant theft loss to the Bank and its customers.  In some cases, the Bank may be required to reimburse customers for losses they incur.  Credit reporting agency intrusions affect the Bank’s customers and can require these customers and the Bank to increase monitoring and take remedial action to prevent unauthorized account activity or access.  Other possible points of intrusion or disruption outside the Company’s control include internet service providers, electronic mail portal providers, social media portals, distant-server (or “cloud”) service providers, electronic data security providers, telecommunications companies and smart phone manufacturers.

The Company is technology dependent and an inability to invest in technological improvements may adversely affect its financial condition and results of operations.

The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services, which may require substantial capital expenditures to modify or adapt existing products and services. In addition to enhancing customer service, the effective use of technology increases efficiency and results in reduced costs, although a financial institution’s initial investment in a technology product or service may represent a significant incremental cost. The Company’s future success will depend, in part, upon the ability to create synergies in operations through the use of technology and to facilitate the ability of customers to engage in financial transactions in a manner that enhances the customer experience. The Company cannot assure that technological improvements will increase operational efficiency or that the Company will be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services or be successful in marketing these products and services to customers, which may cause the Company to lose market share or incur additional expense.

Failure to maintain effective systems of internal and disclosure control could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Effective internal and disclosure controls are necessary to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a public company.  As part of the Company’s ongoing monitoring of internal control, it may discover material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in its internal control that require remediation.  A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.  Any failure to maintain effective controls or to timely effect any necessary improvement of the Company’s internal and disclosure controls could, among other things, result in losses from fraud or error, harm the Company’s reputation or cause investors to lose confidence in the Company’s reported financial information, all of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company relies heavily on its management team and the unexpected loss of key officers may adversely affect operations.

The Company believes that growth and future success will depend in large part on the skills and experience of its executive officers and on their relationships with the communities it serves. The loss of the services of one or more of these officers could disrupt operations and impair the Company’s ability to implement its business strategy, which could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

17


Table of Contents

The success of the Company’s business strategies depends on its ability to identify and recruit individuals with experience and relationships in its primary markets.

The successful implementation of the Company’s business strategy will require the Company to continue to attract, hire, motivate and retain skilled personnel to develop new customer relationships as well as new financial products and services. The market for qualified management personnel is competitive. In addition, the process of identifying and recruiting individuals with the combination of skills and attributes required to carry out the Company’s strategy is often lengthy, and the Company may not be able to effectively integrate these individuals into its operations. The Company’s inability to identify, recruit and retain talented personnel to manage its operations effectively and in a timely manner could limit growth, which could materially adversely affect the Company’s business.

The Company’s corporate culture has contributed to its success, and if the Company cannot maintain this culture, the Company could lose the beneficial aspects fostered by this culture, which could harm business.

The Company believes that a critical contributor to its success has been its corporate culture, which focuses on building personal relationships with its customers. As the Company grows, and more complex organizational management structures are required, the Company may find it increasingly difficult to maintain the beneficial aspects of this corporate culture, which could negatively affect the Company’s future success.

Risks Related to Market Interest Rates

The Company is subject to interest rate risk and fluctuations in interest rates may negatively affect its financial performance.

The Company’s profitability depends, in part, on its net interest margin, which is the difference between the interest earned on loans, securities and other interest-earning assets, and interest paid on deposits and borrowings divided by total interest-earning assets. Changes in interest rates will affect the Company’s net interest margin in diverse ways, including the pricing of loans and deposits, the levels of prepayments and asset quality. The Company is unable to predict actual fluctuations of market interest rates because many factors influencing interest rates are beyond the Company’s control. Management believes that the Company’s current interest rate exposure is manageable and does not indicate any significant exposure to interest rate changes.  The Company expects continued pressure on its net interest margin due to continued low market rates and intense competition for loans and deposits from both local and national financial institutions.  Continued pressure on net interest margin could adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Bank may be required to transition from the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) index in the future.

In 2017, the United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority announced that after 2021 it would no longer compel banks to submit the rates required to calculate LIBOR. On November 30, 2020, the ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, the administrator of the LIBOR, announced that it would consult on its plan to cease the publication of one-week and two-month LIBOR immediately after December 31, 2021 and to cease the publications of the remaining tenors of LIBOR (one, three, six, and 12-month) immediately after June 30, 2023. The Federal Reserve, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC also issued a statement encouraging banks to transition away from LIBOR as soon as practicable. It is unclear whether new methods of calculating LIBOR will be established such that it continues to exist after 2021. As a result, the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. At this time, it is impossible to predict whether and to what extent banks will continue to provide submissions for the calculation of LIBOR. Similarly, it is impossible to predict whether LIBOR will continue to be viewed as an acceptable market benchmark, what rate or rates may become accepted alternatives to LIBOR, or what effects any such changes in views or alternatives may have on the markets for LIBOR-indexed financial instruments.

Regulators, industry groups, and others have, among other things, published recommended replacement language for LIBOR-linked financial instruments, identified recommended alternatives for certain LIBOR rates (e.g., the Secured Overnight Financing Rate), and proposed implementations of the recommended alternatives in floating rate instruments. There is not yet any consensus on what recommendations and proposals will be broadly accepted.

The Company has loans and other financial instruments with attributes that are either directly or indirectly dependent on LIBOR. The transition from LIBOR could create additional costs and additional risk. Since proposed alternative rates are calculated differently, payments under contracts referencing new rates will differ from those referencing LIBOR. The transition could change the Company’s market risk profiles, requiring changes to risk and pricing models, valuation tools, product design and hedging strategies. Furthermore, failure to adequately manage this transition process with customers could adversely impact the Company’s reputation. Although the Company is currently unable to assess what the ultimate impact of the transition from LIBOR will be, failure to adequately manage the transition could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

18


Table of Contents

Risks Related to the Regulation of the Company

Compliance with laws, regulations and supervisory guidance, both new and existing, may adversely affect the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The Company is subject to numerous laws, regulations and supervision from both federal and state agencies. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in financial, structural and operational penalties, including receivership. In addition, establishing systems and processes to achieve compliance with these laws and regulations may increase costs and/or place limits on pursuing certain business opportunities.

The legislative and regulatory environment is beyond the Company’s control, may change rapidly and unpredictably and may negatively influence profitability and capital levels. The Company’s success depends on its ability to maintain compliance with both existing and new laws and regulations.

Future legislation, regulation and government policy could affect the banking industry as a whole, including the Company’s results of operations, in ways that are difficult to predict. In addition, the Company’s results of operations could be adversely affected by changes in the way in which existing statutes and regulations are interpreted or applied by courts and government agencies.

The CFPB may increase the Company’s regulatory compliance burden and could affect consumer financial products and services that the Company offers.

The CFPB is reshaping the consumer financial laws through rulemaking and enforcement of the Dodd-Frank Act’s prohibitions against unfair, deceptive and abusive consumer finance products or practices, which are directly affecting the business operations of financial institutions offering consumer financial products or services.  This agency’s broad rulemaking authority includes identifying practices or acts that are unfair, deceptive or abusive in connection with any consumer financial transaction, financial product or service.  Although the CFPB has jurisdiction over banks with $10 billion or greater in assets, rules, regulations and policies issued by the CFPB may also apply to the Company by virtue of the adoption of such policies and best practices by the Federal Reserve and the FDIC.  Further, the CFPB may include its own examiners in regulatory examinations by the Company’s primary regulators. The total costs and limitations related to this additional regulatory agency and the limitations and restrictions that will be placed upon the Company with respect to consumer products and services have yet to be determined in their entirety.  However, these costs, limitations and restrictions are producing, and may continue to produce, significant, material effects on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

Regulatory capital standards, including the Basel III Capital Rules, require the Company and the Bank to maintain higher levels of capital and liquid assets, which could adversely affect the Company’s profitability and return on equity.

The Basel III Capital Rules and related changes to the standardized calculations of risk-weighted assets are complex and created additional compliance burdens, especially for community banks. The Basel III Capital Rules require bank holding companies and their subsidiaries to maintain significantly more capital as a result of higher required capital levels and more demanding regulatory capital risk weightings and calculations.  While the Company is exempt from these capital requirements under the SBHC Policy Statement, the Bank is not exempt and must comply.  The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the “prompt corrective action” regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.  Satisfying capital requirements may require the Company or the Bank to limit its banking operations, retain net income or reduce dividends to improve regulatory capital levels, which could negatively affect its business, financial condition and results of operations.  The EGRRCPA amended the Dodd-Frank Act to, among other things, provide relief from certain of these requirements.  The Company does not expect the EGRRCPA and the related rulemakings to materially reduce the impact of capital requirements on its business.

The Company’s earnings are significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies.

The policies of the Federal Reserve affect the Company significantly. The Federal Reserve regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. Its policies directly and indirectly influence the rate of interest earned on loans and paid on borrowings and interest-bearing deposits and can also affect the value of financial instruments. Those policies determine, to a significant extent, the cost of funds for lending and investing. Changes in those policies are beyond the Company’s control and are difficult to predict. Federal Reserve policies can also affect the Company’s borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their loans. This could adversely affect the borrower’s earnings and ability to repay a loan, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.


19


Table of Contents

The Company’s deposit insurance premiums could increase in the future, which may adversely affect future financial performance.

The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions, including the Bank.  The FDIC charges insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the DIF at a certain level.  Economic conditions that began with the financial crisis of 2008 increased the rate of bank failures through 2014, requiring the FDIC to make payments for insured deposits from the DIF and prepare for future payments from the DIF.  A depository institution’s deposit insurance assessment is calculated based on the institution’s total assets less tangible equity, rather than the previous base of total deposits.  The Bank’s FDIC insurance premiums could increase in future periods if the Bank’s asset size increases, if the FDIC raises base assessment rates, or if the FDIC takes other actions to replenish the DIF.

General Risk Factors

Changes in accounting standards and management’s selection of accounting methods, including assumptions and estimates, could materially affect the Company’s financial statements.

From time to time, the SEC and Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) change the financial accounting and reporting standards that govern the preparation of the Company’s financial statements. These changes can be hard to predict and can materially affect how the Company records and reports its financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, the Company could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, resulting in changes to previously reported financial results, or a cumulative charge to retained earnings. In addition, management is required to use certain assumptions and estimates in preparing financial statements, including determining the fair value of certain assets and liabilities, among other items. If the assumptions or estimates are incorrect, the Company may experience unexpected material consequences.

The Company’s common stock price may be volatile, which could result in losses to investors.

The Company’s common stock price has been volatile in the past, and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate in the future. These factors include, but are not limited to, actual or anticipated variations in earnings, changes in analysts’ recommendations or projections, operations and stock performance of other peer companies, and reports of trends and concerns and other issues related to the financial services industry. Fluctuations in the Company’s common stock price may be unrelated to performance. General market declines or market volatility in the future, especially in the financial institutions sector, could adversely affect the price of the Company’s common stock, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices.

Future sales of the Company’s common stock by shareholders or the perception that those sales could occur may cause the Company’s common stock price to decline.

Although the Company’s common stock is listed for trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market, the trading volume may be lower than that of other larger financial institutions. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of the common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which the Company has no control. Given the potential for lower relative trading volume, significant sales of the common stock in the public market, or the perception that those sales may occur, could cause the trading price of the Company’s common stock to decline or to be lower than it otherwise might be in the absence of these sales or perceptions.

Future issuances of the Company’s common stock could adversely affect the market price and could be dilutive.

The Company may issue additional shares of common stock or securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, shares of the Company’s common stock. Issuances of a substantial number of shares of common stock, or the expectation that such issuances might occur, could adversely affect the market price of the shares of common stock and could be dilutive to shareholders. Any decision the Company makes to issue common stock in the future will depend on market conditions and other factors, and the Company cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing, or nature of possible future issuances.  Accordingly, the Company’s shareholders bear the risk that future issuances could reduce the market price of the common stock and dilute their stock holdings in the Company.

The Company’s dividends may not be sustained.

Although the Company has historically paid cash dividends to holders of its common stock, holders of common stock are not entitled to receive dividends.  Financial, regulatory or economic factors may cause the Company’s Board of Directors to consider, among other actions, the suspension or reduction of dividends paid on the Company’s common stock.  Furthermore, the Company is a smaller reportingbank holding company under SEC rules.


that conducts substantially all of its operations through its subsidiaries, including the Bank. As a result, the Company relies on dividends from the Bank for substantially all of its revenues. There are various regulatory restrictions on the ability of the Bank to pay

20


Table of Contents

dividends or make other payments to the Company. If the Bank is unable to pay dividends to the Company, the Company may not be able to pay a cash dividend to the holders of the Company’s common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

8

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

The Company, through its subsidiary bank, owns or leases buildings which are used in normal business operations.  The executive officesfollowing describes the location and general character of the Company and the main officephysical properties of the Company.

The Bank are eachowns two buildings located in the Town of Warrenton at 10 Courthouse Square, Warrenton, Virginia 20186. Virginia.  These buildings house the Company’s executive offices and the Bank’s main office, loan operations, information technology and Wealth Management.

The Bank has 11 full service branch officesowns a building located in the Town of Warrenton at 87 W. Lee Highway, Warrenton, Virginia communities of Old Town-Warrenton, Warrenton, Catlett,which houses a retail banking branch and the Bank’s deposit operations department.

The Bank owns four retail banking branches located in Fauquier County:  6464 Main Street, The Plains, Sudley Road-Manassas,Virginia; 5119 Lee Highway, New Baltimore, Virginia; 3543 Catlett Road, Catlett, Virginia; and 6207 Station Drive, Bealeton, Virginia.

The Bank owns two retail banking branches located in Prince William County:  7485 Limestone Drive, Gainesville, Virginia; and 8780 Centreville Road, Manassas, Virginia.  

The Bank leases three retail banking branches located in Prince William County:  15240 Washington Street, Haymarket, Virginia; 10260 Bristow Haymarket, GainesvilleCenter Drive, Bristow, Virginia; and Centreville Road-Manassas,8091 Sudley Road, Manassas, Virginia. See the Note 1 “Nature

The Company believes all of Banking Activitiesits properties are in good operating condition and Significant Accounting Policies”are adequate for its present and Note 9 “Commitments and Contingent Liabilities” in the “Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K for information with respect to the amounts at which the Company’s premises and equipment are carried and commitments under long-term leases.


anticipated future needs.

In the ordinary course of operations,business, the Company and the Bank are parties to various legal proceedings. There areis no pending or threatened legal proceedings to which the Company or the Bank is a party or to which the property of either the Company or the Bank is subject that, in the opinion of management, may materially impact the financial condition of either entity.


ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


21


Table of Contents

PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Market Information and Holders

The Company’s common stock trades on the Nasdaq Capital Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “FBSS”. As of March 16, 2018,26, 2021, there were 3,773,6033,807,659 shares outstanding of the Company’s common stock, which is the Company’s only class of stock outstanding. These shares were held by approximately 334313 holders of record. As of March 16, 2018,26, 2021, the closing market price of the Company’s common stock was $21.75.


$20.70.

Dividends

The following table sets forthCompany declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.125 per share in 2020.  The Company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.12 per share in the highfirst, second and low sales prices as reported by Nasdaq forthird quarters of 2019.  In the Company’s common stock andfourth quarter of 2019, the amountsCompany declared a quarterly cash dividend of the cash dividends paid for each full quarterly period within the two most recent fiscal years.


  2017  2016  Dividends per share 
  High  Low  High  Low  2017  2016 
1st Quarter $19.88  $16.20  $15.96  $14.38  $0.12  $0.12 
2nd Quarter $19.60  $17.62  $15.75  $14.47  $0.12  $0.12 
3rd Quarter $20.18  $17.24  $14.95  $14.13  $0.12  $0.12 
4th Quarter $22.25  $19.06  $16.79  $14.49  $0.12  $0.12 

$0.125 per share.  

The Company’s future dividend policy is subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon a number of factors, including future earnings, financial condition, cash and capital requirements, and general business conditions. The Company’s ability to pay cash dividends will depend entirely upon the Bank’s ability to pay dividends to the Company. Transfers of funds from the Bank to the Company in the form of loans, advances and cash dividends are restricted by federal and state regulatory authorities.


banking laws and regulations.

Stock Repurchases

On an annual basis, the Company'sCompany’s Board of Directors authorizes the number of shares of common stock that can be repurchased. On January 21, 2018,16, 2020, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase up to 112,880113,512 shares (3% of the shares of common stock outstanding on January 1, 2018)2020) beginning January 1, 2018.2020. During the year ended December 31, 2017, 3822020, 2,007 shares of common stock were repurchased at an average price of $17.55$19.21 per share.  No shares were repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2017.


9
2020.

22


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The selected consolidated financial data set forth below should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation”Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included elsewhere in this report. The historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for any future period.

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

EARNINGS STATEMENT DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

$

28,312

 

 

$

29,170

 

 

$

26,698

 

 

$

23,320

 

 

$

21,574

 

Interest expense

 

 

2,541

 

 

 

4,520

 

 

 

3,233

 

 

 

2,049

 

 

 

1,843

 

Net interest income

 

 

25,771

 

 

 

24,650

 

 

 

23,465

 

 

 

21,271

 

 

 

19,731

 

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

 

 

1,773

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

507

 

 

 

520

 

 

 

(508

)

Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses

 

 

23,998

 

 

 

24,304

 

 

 

22,958

 

 

 

20,751

 

 

 

20,239

 

Noninterest income

 

 

5,474

 

 

 

5,895

 

 

 

5,236

 

 

 

5,468

 

 

 

5,296

 

Gain on sale and call of securities

 

 

992

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

838

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1

 

Noninterest expense

 

 

23,520

 

 

 

22,454

 

 

 

22,151

 

 

 

20,844

 

 

 

20,925

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

6,944

 

 

 

7,824

 

 

 

6,881

 

 

 

5,375

 

 

 

4,611

 

Income taxes

 

 

1,067

 

 

 

1,004

 

 

 

746

 

 

 

2,879

 

 

 

937

 

Net income

 

$

5,877

 

 

$

6,820

 

 

$

6,135

 

 

$

2,496

 

 

$

3,674

 

PER SHARE DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share, basic

 

$

1.55

 

 

$

1.80

 

 

$

1.63

 

 

$

0.66

 

 

$

0.98

 

Net income per share, diluted

 

$

1.55

 

 

$

1.80

 

 

$

1.62

 

 

$

0.66

 

 

$

0.98

 

Cash dividends

 

$

0.50

 

 

$

0.485

 

 

$

0.48

 

 

$

0.48

 

 

$

0.48

 

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic

 

 

3,793,366

 

 

 

3,783,322

 

 

 

3,772,421

 

 

 

3,764,690

 

 

 

3,753,757

 

Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted

 

 

3,798,816

 

 

 

3,790,718

 

 

 

3,779,366

 

 

 

3,773,010

 

 

 

3,763,929

 

Book value

 

$

19.08

 

 

$

17.74

 

 

$

15.90

 

 

$

14.92

 

 

$

14.51

 

BALANCE SHEET DATA:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

867,173

 

 

$

722,171

 

 

$

730,805

 

 

$

644,613

 

 

$

624,445

 

Loans, net

 

 

609,879

 

 

 

544,999

 

 

 

544,188

 

 

 

497,705

 

 

 

458,608

 

Securities, including restricted investments

 

 

84,683

 

 

 

81,799

 

 

 

74,124

 

 

 

73,699

 

 

 

51,755

 

Deposits

 

 

766,119

 

 

 

622,155

 

 

 

635,638

 

 

 

570,023

 

 

 

546,157

 

Shareholders' equity

 

 

72,461

 

 

 

67,122

 

 

 

60,007

 

 

 

56,142

 

 

 

54,451

 

PERFORMANCE RATIOS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest margin(1)

 

 

3.46

%

 

 

3.74

%

 

3.81%

 

 

3.66%

 

 

3.50%

 

Return on average assets

 

 

0.73

%

 

 

0.96

%

 

0.92%

 

 

0.39%

 

 

0.60%

 

Return on average equity

 

 

8.31

%

 

 

10.64

%

 

10.64%

 

 

4.44%

 

 

6.82%

 

Dividend payout

 

 

32.26

%

 

 

26.94

%

 

29.63%

 

 

72.44%

 

 

49.07%

 

Efficiency ratio (GAAP)

 

 

72.96

%

 

 

73.32

%

 

74.99%

 

 

77.95%

 

 

83.61%

 

ASSET QUALITY RATIOS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

 

 

1.11

%

 

 

0.95

%

 

0.94%

 

 

1.01%

 

 

0.98%

 

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans

 

 

67.41

%

 

 

102.57

%

 

78.65%

 

 

56.43%

 

 

38.72%

 

Nonperforming assets to total assets

 

 

1.87

%

 

 

0.89

%

 

1.09%

 

 

1.60%

 

 

2.10%

 

Nonaccrual loans to total loans

 

 

0.20

%

 

 

0.18

%

 

0.36%

 

 

0.63%

 

 

0.76%

 

Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

 

 

0.02

%

 

 

0.05

%

 

0.08%

 

 

(0.01%)

 

 

(0.19%)

 

CAPITAL RATIOS:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leverage

 

 

8.54

%

 

 

9.40

%

 

9.39%

 

 

9.17%

 

 

9.23%

 

Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio

 

 

12.67

%

 

 

12.58

%

 

11.89%

 

 

11.43%

 

 

12.22%

 

Tier 1 capital ratio

 

 

12.67

%

 

 

12.58

%

 

11.89%

 

 

11.43%

 

 

12.22%

 

Total capital ratio

 

 

13.87

%

 

 

13.54

%

 

12.85%

 

 

12.41%

 

 

13.17%

 

  For the Year Ended December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
EARNINGS STATEMENT DATA:               
Interest income $23,320  $21,574  $21,694  $21,935  $23,045 
Interest expense  2,049   1,843   1,962   2,564   3,062 
Net interest income  21,271   19,731   19,732   19,371   19,983 
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses  520   (508)  8,000      1,800 
Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses  20,751   20,239   11,732   19,371   18,183 
Noninterest income  5,468   5,296   6,414   6,619   6,551 
Gain on sale and call of securities     1   4   3   144 
Noninterest expense  20,844   20,925   20,186   19,807   19,106 
Income (loss) before income taxes  5,375   4,611   (2,036)  6,186   5,772 
Income taxes  2,879   937   (1,424)  1,380   1,441 
Net income (loss) $2,496  $3,674  $(612) $4,806  $4,331 
PER SHARE DATA:                    
Net income (loss) per share, basic $0.66  $0.98  $(0.16) $1.29  $1.17 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted $0.66  $0.98  $(0.16) $1.28  $1.16 
Cash dividends $0.48  $0.48  $0.48  $0.53  $0.48 
Average basic shares outstanding  3,764,690   3,753,757   3,742,725   3,728,316   3,710,802 
Average diluted shares outstanding  3,773,010   3,763,929   3,742,725   3,747,247   3,727,886 
Book value at period end $14.92  $14.51  $14.06  $14.78  $13.80 
BALANCE SHEET DATA:                    
Total assets $644,613  $624,445  $601,400  $606,286  $615,774 
Loans, net  497,705   458,608   442,669   435,070   444,710 
Securities, including restricted investments  73,699   51,755   56,510   58,700   55,033 
Deposits  570,023   546,157   524,294   525,215   540,204 
Shareholders' equity  56,142   54,451   52,633   55,157   51,227 
                     
PERFORMANCE RATIOS:                    
Net interest margin(1)
  3.66%  3.50%  3.62%  3.55%  3.64%
Return (loss) on average assets  0.39%  0.60%  (0.10%)  0.80%  0.72%
Return (loss) on average equity  4.44%  6.82%  (1.09%)  8.98%  8.89%
Dividend payout  72.44%  49.07%  (293.79%)  41.16%  41.15%
Efficiency ratio(2)
  76.80%  82.36%  75.50%  74.96%  70.72%
                     
ASSET QUALITY RATIOS:                    
Allowance for loan losses to total loans  1.01%  0.98%  0.94%  1.22%  1.48%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans  56.43%  38.72%  41.28%  40.81%  34.69%
Nonperforming assets to total assets  1.61%  2.09%  1.91%  2.41%  4.00%
Nonaccrual loans to total loans  0.63%  0.76%  0.41%  0.28%  0.48%
Net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans  (0.01%)  (0.19%)  2.04%  0.29%  0.31%
                     
CAPITAL RATIOS:                    
Leverage  9.17%  9.23%  9.13%  9.83%  9.24%
Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio  11.43%  12.22%  11.64% NA  NA 
Tier 1 capital ratio  11.43%  12.22%  11.64%  14.05%  13.28%
Total capital ratio  12.41%  13.17%  12.53%  15.30%  14.54%

(1)

Net interest margin is calculated as fully taxable equivalent net interest income divided by average earning assets and represents the Company'sCompany’s net yield on its earning assets.

(2)Efficiency ratio is computed by dividing noninterest expense by the sum of fully taxable equivalent net interest income and fully taxable equivalent noninterest income.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

In addition to the historical information contained herein, this

This report contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and describe future plans, strategies, and expectationswithin the meaning of the Company and are generally identifiable by usePrivate Securities Litigation Reform Act of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” “may,” “will” or similar expressions. Although the Company believes its plans, intentions and expectations reflected in these1995. These forward-looking statements are reasonable, the Company can give no assurance that these plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved. The Company's ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain, and actual results could differ materially from those contemplated. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on the Company's operations and future prospects include, but are not limited to, statements about (i) the benefits, expenses and expected completion date of the merger between Virginia National and Fauquier; (ii) Fauquier’s plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this report that are not historical facts; and (iii) other statements identified by words such as “may”, “assumes”, “approximately”, “will”, “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “seeks”, “estimates”, “targets”, “projects”, or words of similar meaning generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of the management of Fauquier and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond the control of the Company. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change and difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood and degree of occurrence. As a result, although Fauquier believes that its expectations with respect to forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its existing knowledge of its business and operations, actual results may differ materially from any projected future results performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.  

The following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements: (1) the businesses of Virginia National and Fauquier may not be combined successfully, or such combination may take longer, be more difficult, time-consuming or costly to accomplish than expected; (2) the expected growth opportunities or cost savings from the Merger may not be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected; (3) deposit attrition, operating costs, customer losses and business disruption following the Merger, including adverse effects on relationships with employees and customers, may be greater than expected; (4) the regulatory approvals required for the Merger may not be obtained on the proposed terms or on the anticipated schedule; (5) the shareholders of Virginia National or Fauquier may fail to approve the Merger; (6) economic, legislative or regulatory changes, in:including changes in accounting standards, may adversely affect the businesses in which Virginia National and Fauquier are engaged; (7) the interest rates,rate environment may further compress margins and adversely affect net interest income; (8) results may be adversely affected by continued diversification of assets and adverse changes to credit quality; (9) competition from other financial services companies in Virginia National’s and Fauquier’s markets could adversely affect operations; (10) an economic slowdown could adversely affect credit quality and loan originations; (11) general economic conditions, including unemployment levels and slowdowns in economic growth, and particularly related to further and sustained economic impacts of the legislative/regulatory climate,COVID-19 pandemic; (12) monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. Government, including policies of the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve, the quality and composition of the Company's loanReserve; (13) cyber threats, attacks or investment portfolios, the value of the collateral securing loans in the loan portfolio, demand for loan products, deposit flows, level of net charge-offs on loans and the adequacy of the Company's allowance for loan losses, competition, demand for financial services in the Company's market area, the Company's plans to increase its market share, mergers, acquisitions and dispositions, and tax andevents; (14) accounting principles, policies and guidelines. These risksguidelines and uncertainties should be consideredelections made by Fauquier thereunder; (15) competition from other financial institutions and financial-intermediaries; (16) the novel COVID-19 pandemic is adversely affecting Virginia National, Fauquier, and their respective customers, employees and third-party service providers; the adverse impacts of the pandemic on their respective business, financial position, operations and prospects have been material, and it is not possible to accurately predict the extent, severity or duration of the pandemic or when normal economic and operation conditions will return; (17) potential claims, damages and fines related to litigation or government actions, including litigation or actions arising from Fauquier or Virginia National’s participation in evaluatingand administration of programs related to COVID-19, including, among other things, the PPP under the CARES Act, as subsequently extended; and (18) other factors that may affect future results of Virginia National and Fauquier, including: changes in asset quality and credit risk; the inability to sustain revenue and earnings growth; changes in interest rates and capital markets; inflation; customer borrowing, repayment, investment and deposit practices; the impact, extent and timing of technological changes; capital management activities; and other actions of the bank regulatory agencies and legislative and regulatory actions and reforms. Additional factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements are discussed in Fauquier’s reports (such as Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K) filed with the SEC and available on the SEC’s Internet site (http://www.sec.gov).

Readers are cautioned not to rely too heavily on the forward-looking statements contained in this report and you should not place undue reliance on suchreport.  Forward-looking statements which reflect our positionspeak only as of the date they are made and Fauquier does not undertake any obligation to update, revise or clarify these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of this report.


new information, future events or otherwise.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

GENERAL. The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The financial information contained within the Company'sCompany’s statements is, to a significant extent, based on measures of the financial effects of transactions and events that have already occurred. A variety of factors could affect the ultimate value

24


Table of Contents

that is obtained either when earning income, recognizing an expense, recovering an asset or relieving a liability. The Company uses historical loss factors as one factor in determining the inherent loss that may be present in its loan portfolio. Actual losses could differ significantly from the historical factors that the Company uses in its estimates. In addition, GAAP itself may change from one previously acceptable accounting method to another method. Although the economics of the Company’s transactions would be the same, the timing of the recognition of the Company’s transactions could change.


ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES. The allowance for loan losses is an estimate of the losses that may be sustained in the Company's loan portfolio. The allowance is based on three basic principles of accounting: (i) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 450 “Contingencies” which requires that losses be accrued when they are probable of occurring and estimable, (ii) ASC 310 “Receivables” which requires that losses be accrued based on the differences between the value of collateral, present value of future cash flows or values that are observable in the secondary market and the loan balance and (iii) SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 102, “Selected Loan Loss Allowance Methodology and Documentation Issues,” which requires adequate documentation to supportCompany establishes the allowance for loan losses estimate.


The Company’s allowancethrough charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. Loan losses has three basic components:are charged against the specific allowance when it is believed that the general allowance and the unallocated component. Each of these components is determined based upon estimates that can and do change as actual events occur. The specific allowance is used to individually allocate an allowance for larger balance and/or non-homogeneous loans identified as impaired. The specific allowance uses various techniques to arrive at an estimate of loss. Analysiscollection of the borrower’s overall financial condition, resources and payment record,principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries of losses previously charged against the prospects for support and financial guarantors, andallowance are credited to the fair market value of collateral are usedallowance. The allowance represents an amount that, in management’s judgment, will be adequate to estimate the probability and severity of inherent losses. The general allowance is used for estimating the loss on pools of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans; including 1-4 family mortgage loans, installment loans and other consumer loans. Also, the general allowance is used for the remaining pool of larger balance and/or non-homogeneous loans which were not identified as impaired. The general allowance begins with estimates ofabsorb probable losses inherent in the homogeneous portfolioloan portfolio. Management’s judgment in determining the level of the allowance is based upon various statistical analyses. These include analysison evaluations of historical delinquencythe collectability of loans while taking into consideration such factors as trends in delinquencies and credit loss experience, together with analyses that reflect current trends and conditions. The Company also considers trends andcharge-offs for relevant periods of time, changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, current economic conditions that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay and termthe value of loans, changes in the credit process and/or lending policiescollateral, overall portfolio quality and procedures, and anreview of specific potential losses. This evaluation of overall credit quality. The general allowance uses a historical loss view as an indicator of future losses. As a result, even though this history is regularly updated with the most recent loss information,inherently subjective because it could differ from the loss incurred in the future. The general allowance also captures lossesrequires estimates that are attributablesusceptible to various economic events, industry or geographic sectors whose impact on the portfolio have occurred but have yet to be recognized.  The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.

Specifically, the Company uses both external and internal qualitative factors when determining the non-loan-specific allowances. The external factors utilized include: unemployment in the Company’s defined market area of Fauquier County, Prince William County, and the City of Manassas (“market area”),significant revision as well as state and national unemployment trends; new residential construction permits for the market area; bankruptcy statistics for the Virginia Eastern District and trends for the United States; and foreclosure statistics for the market area and the state. Quarterly, these external qualitative factors, as well as relevant anecdotalmore information are evaluated from data compiled from local periodicals such as The Washington Post, The Fauquier Times, and The Bull Run Observer, which cover the Company’s market area. Additionally, data is gathered from the Federal Reserve Beige Book for the Richmond Federal Reserve District, Global Insight’s monthly economic review, the George Mason School of Public Policy Center for Regional Analysis, and daily economic updates from various other sources. Internal Bank data utilized includes: past due loan aging statistics, nonperforming loan trends, trends in collateral values, loan concentrations, loan review status downgrade trends, and lender turnover and experience trends. Both external and internal data is analyzed on a rolling twelve quarter basis to determine risk profiles for each qualitative factor. Ratings are assigned through a defined matrix to calculate the allowance consistent with authoritative accounting literature. A narrative summary of the reserve allowance is produced quarterly and reported directlybecomes available.  Note 1 to the Company’s Board of Directors. The Company’s application of these qualitative factorsConsolidated Financial Statements presented in Item 8, Financial Statements and Supplementary Data provides additional information related to the allowance for loan losses has been consistent over the reporting period.

losses.

The Company employs an independent outsourced loan review function, which annually substantiates and/or adjusts internally generated risk ratings. This independent review is reportedfunction reports directly to the Company’s Board of Directors’ audit committee, and the results of this review are factored into the calculation of the allowance for loan losses.

OTHER-THAN-TEMPORARY IMPAIRMENT (“OTTI”) FOR SECURITIES. Impairment of securities occurs when the fair value of a security is less than its amortized cost. For debt securities, impairment is considered other-than-temporary and recognized in its entirety in net income if either (i) the Company intends to sell the security or (ii) it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If, however, the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery, the Company must determine what portion of the impairment is attributable to a credit loss, which occurs when the amortized cost basis of the security exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security. If there is no credit loss, there is no OTTI. If there is a credit loss, OTTI exists, and the credit loss must be recognized in net income and the remaining portion of impairment must be recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). For equity securities, impairment is considered to be other-than-temporary based on the Company'sCompany’s ability and intent to hold the investment until a recovery of fair value. OTTI of an equity security results in a write-down that must be included in net income. The Company regularly reviews each investment security for OTTI based on criteria that includes the extent to which cost exceeds market price, the duration of that market decline, the financial health of and specific prospects for the issuer, the best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from debt securities, the intention with regard to holding the security to maturity and the likelihood that the Company would be required to sell the security before recovery.

IMPACT OF COVID-19

On March 11,

2020, the World Health Organization declared COVID-19 a pandemic as a result of the global spread of the illness.  In response to the outbreak, federal and state authorities in the U.S. introduced various measures to try to limit or slow the spread of COVID-19, including travel restrictions, nonessential business closures, stay-at-home orders and strict social distancing.  

To the extent the economic impacts of COVID-19 continue for a prolonged period and conditions stagnate or worsen, the Company’s provision for loan losses, net interest income and overall profitability may be adversely affected.

Business Continuity

The Company remains committed to adhering to health and safety-related requirements and best practices across all locations by taking proactive and disciplined steps to promote safety and overall wellbeing of employees, clients, shareholders and communities.  The Company’s Enterprise Risk Management framework, which is overseen by the Board of Directors, the Company’s Business Continuity Plan and the Bank’s Incident Response Plan remain integral parts of monitoring day to day business activities.  The Company has not furloughed nor does the Company expect to furlough any employees. Management continues to closely monitor business activities and has or will adjust accordingly as the health and safety of all constituents continues to be the priority.

25


Table of Contents

Paycheck Protection Program

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted to, among other provisions, provide emergency assistance for individuals, families and businesses affected by COVID-19.  The CARES Act included the creation of the PPP through the SBA.  Loans provided by the Bank through the PPP may be forgiven based on the borrowers’ compliance with the terms of the program.  The SBA provides a 100% guaranty to the lender of principal and interest, unless the lender violates an obligation under the agreement.  As loan losses are expected to be immaterial, if any at all, due to the SBA guaranty, there is no provision allocated for PPP loans within the allowance for loan loss calculation.  The Company disbursed $53.1 million in PPP loans to 549 borrowers and has forgiven 223 PPP loans with an aggregate principal balance of $22.6 million in aggregate principal loan balances through December 31, 2020. During the first quarter of 2021, the Company disbursed $28.6 million in PPP loans to 346 borrowers and has forgiven 126 PPP loans with an aggregate principal balance of $9.2 million.  

The following table summarizes the details of the Company’s PPP loans:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

 

PPP loans originated

 

$

53,082

 

PPP loans forgiven

 

$

22,555

 

Average PPP loans outstanding

 

$

34,672

 

PPP average loan size outstanding

 

$

82

 

PPP interest income

 

$

347

 

PPP fee income, net

 

$

879

 

PPP outstanding unearned fees

 

$

963

 

PPP weighted average processing fee

 

 

4.00

%

Average yield on PPP loans

 

 

3.54

%

Short-term Loan Modifications

Under the provisions of the CARES Act, the Company established a short-term loan modification program, allowing the deferral of scheduled payments for a 90-day period beginning in April 2020.  Modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any relief were not considered trouble debt restructurings (“TDRs”).  Borrowers who were considered current were ones whose loans were less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time the modification was entered.  The CARES Act and interagency guidance provided financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain accounting requirements related to TDRs with respect to loan modifications, including the deferral of scheduled payments.  The following table summarizes loans modifications and loan payment deferrals, by loan segment, as of December 31, 2020.  

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Balance

 

 

Loan

Deferrals

 

 

Loan Modifications

 

 

Loan Deferrals and Modifications to

Total Loans

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

68,390

 

 

$

147

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

0.02

%

Commercial real estate

 

 

200,690

 

 

229

 

 

 

2,576

 

 

 

0.45

%

Construction and land

 

 

73,966

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Consumer

 

 

6,355

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Student

 

 

6,971

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Residential real estate

 

 

230,885

 

 

 

72

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.01

%

Home equity lines of credit

 

 

29,492

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

 

$

616,749

 

 

$

448

 

 

$

2,576

 

 

 

0.49

%

Borrowers whose industries are expected to be stressed by COVID-19, include, but are not limited to, religious organizations, hospitality, childcare and restaurants.  The following table summarizes these industries as it relates to the Company’s loan portfolio at December 31, 2020:

26


Table of Contents

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

 

Loan Category

 

Balance

 

 

Percent of

Total Loans

 

Religious Organizations

 

$

25,625

 

 

 

4.15

%

Hospitality

 

 

15,691

 

 

 

2.54

%

Childcare

 

 

14,407

 

 

 

2.34

%

Restaurants

 

 

11,189

 

 

 

1.81

%

 

 

$

66,912

 

 

 

10.85

%

Net interest income

While net interest income was significantly impacted by the lower interest rate environment during 2020, the Company’s interest income benefited from PPP loans and related processing fees.  PPP loans carry a fixed rate of 1.0% with a two-year contractual maturity.  For the year ended December 31, 2020, PPP loans contributed approximately $1.2 million to the Company’s net interest income, with the average yield of 3.54%.  

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

This discussion is intended to focus on certain financial information regarding the Company and the Bank and may not contain all the information that is important to the reader. The purpose of this discussion is to provide the reader with a more thorough understanding of the Company'sCompany’s financial statements. As such, this discussion should be read carefully in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes contained elsewhere in this report.


The Bank is the primary independent community bank in its immediate market area as measured by deposit market share. It seeks to be theCompany’s primary financial service provider for its market area by providingobjectives are to maximize earnings and to deploy capital in profitable growth initiatives that will enhance long-term shareholder value. The Company monitors the right mix of consistently high quality customer service, efficient technological support, value-added products,following financial performance metrics towards achieving these goals: (i) return on average assets (“ROA”), (ii) return on average equity (“ROE”), and (iii) growth in earnings.  The Company also actively manages capital through growth and dividends, while considering the need to maintain a strong commitment to the community.


The Company's primary operating businesses are in commercial and retail lending, core deposit account relationships, and assets under WMS management.  The revenues of the Company are primarily derived from net interest income, the largest component of net income, and equals the difference between income generated on interest-earning assets and interest expense incurred on interest-bearing liabilities. regulatory capital position.

Future trends regarding net interest income are dependent on the absolute level of market interest rates, the shape of the yield curve, the amount of lost income from nonperforming assets, the amount of prepaying loans,loan prepayments, the mix and amount of various deposit types, and many other factors, as well as the overall volume of interest-earning assets. Many of these factors are individually difficult to predict, and when factored together, the uncertainty of future trends compounds. Based on management’s current projections, net interest income may increase in 2018 with the growth of average loans, but this may be offset in part or in whole by a possible contraction in the Company’s net interest margin resulting from the prolonged historically low levels in market interest rates. The Company is also subject to a decline in net interest income due to competitive market conditions and/or a flat or inverted yield curve. A steeper yield curve is projected to result in an increase in net interest income, while a flatter or inverted yield curve is projected to result in a decrease in net interest income.


For the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, the Company’s return on average equity (“ROE”)ROE and on average assets (“ROA”)ROA were 4.44%8.31% and 0.39%0.73%, respectively, compared to 6.82%10.64% and 0.60%0.96%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2016.  Excluding the effect of the nonrecurring revaluation of the Company’s net deferred tax asset related to the Tax Act, for the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company’s adjusted ROE and adjusted ROA were 7.39% and 0.66%, respectively.  For reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures, refer to section “Non-GAAP Measures” included within this Item 7.


2019.

Total assets were $644.6$867.2 million on December 31, 20172020 compared to $624.4$722.2 million on December 31, 2016.2019. Net loans increased $39.1 million or 8.53% to $497.7were $609.9   million on December 31, 2017 from $458.62020 compared to $545.0 million on December 31, 2016.2019. Total deposits were $570.0$766.1 million on December 31, 20172020 compared to $546.2$622.2 million on December 31, 2016,2019, respectively. Low cost transaction deposits (demand and interest checking accounts) were $361.2increased to $449.2 million an increase of $12.4 million fromon December 31, 2016.


2020, from $366.0 on December 31, 2019.

The Company had net income of $2.5$5.9 million, or $0.66$1.55 per diluted share, in 2017in 2020 compared to $3.7$6.8 million, or $0.98$1.80 per diluted share for 2016.  2019. Net interest margin was 3.66%3.46% for the year ended December 31, 20172020 compared to 3.50%3.74% for the year ended December 31, 2016.2019. Net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased $1.52020 was $25.8 million to $21.3 million when compared to $19.7$24.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016.  The decrease2019.

On October 1, 2020, the Company and Virginia National announced the Merger Agreement pursuant to which the Company and Virginia National will engage in net income was primarily due tothe effect“Merger. Upon consummation of the Tax Act, which was signedMerger, the holders of shares of the Company's common stock will be converted into law on December 22, 2017. Among other things, the Tax Act permanently lowersright to receive 0.675 shares of Virginia National common stock for each share of the federal corporate income tax rate to 21% from the maximum rate of 35%Company's common stock held immediately prior to the passage of the Tax Act, effective January 1, 2018. As a result of the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate, GAAP requires companies to re-measure their deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities, including those accounted for in accumulated other comprehensive income, as of the date of the Tax Act’s enactment and record the corresponding effectsMerger, plus cash in income tax expense.  As a resultlieu of the permanent reductionfractional shares. The transaction is expected to be completed in the corporate income tax rate, the Company recognized a $1.7 million reduction in the value of its net deferred tax asset and recorded a corresponding incremental income tax expense of $1.7 million in the Company’s consolidated results of operations for the fourthsecond quarter of 2017. 


2021.  The companies have received regulatory and shareholder approvals, and the transaction remains subject to other customary closing conditions.

27


Table of Contents

The following table presents a quarterly summary of consolidated net income for the last two years.

 

 

For the Quarter Ended

 

 

For the Quarter Ended

 

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

December 31,

2020

 

 

September 30,

2020

 

 

June 30,

2020

 

 

March 31,

2020

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

 

September 30,

2019

 

 

June 30,

2019

 

 

March 31,

2019

 

Interest income

 

$

7,406

 

 

$

6,841

 

 

$

7,008

 

 

$

7,057

 

 

$

7,350

 

 

$

7,362

 

 

$

7,279

 

 

$

7,179

 

Interest expense

 

 

502

 

 

 

547

 

 

 

624

 

 

 

868

 

 

 

1,108

 

 

 

1,171

 

 

 

1,195

 

 

 

1,046

 

Net interest income

 

 

6,904

 

 

 

6,294

 

 

 

6,384

 

 

 

6,189

 

 

 

6,242

 

 

 

6,191

 

 

 

6,084

 

 

 

6,133

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

167

 

 

 

345

 

 

 

911

 

 

 

350

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

205

 

 

 

50

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

 

6,737

 

 

 

5,949

 

 

 

5,473

 

 

 

5,839

 

 

 

6,151

 

 

 

6,191

 

 

 

5,879

 

 

 

6,083

 

Gains on sales of securities available for sale, net

 

 

992

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Other noninterest income

 

 

1,438

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

1,216

 

 

 

1,342

 

 

 

1,484

 

 

 

1,610

 

 

 

1,400

 

 

 

1,480

 

Noninterest expense

 

 

7,357

 

 

 

5,670

 

 

 

4,889

 

 

 

5,605

 

 

 

5,808

 

 

 

5,419

 

 

 

5,509

 

 

 

5,718

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

1,810

 

 

 

1,757

 

 

 

1,800

 

 

 

1,576

 

 

 

1,827

 

 

 

2,382

 

 

 

1,770

 

 

 

1,845

 

Income tax expense

 

 

454

 

 

 

210

 

 

 

222

 

 

 

180

 

 

 

255

 

 

 

330

 

 

 

206

 

 

 

213

 

Net income

 

$

1,356

 

 

$

1,547

 

 

$

1,578

 

 

$

1,396

 

 

$

1,572

 

 

$

2,052

 

 

$

1,564

 

 

$

1,632

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income per share, basic

 

$

0.36

 

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.42

 

 

$

0.37

 

 

$

0.42

 

 

$

0.54

 

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.43

 

Net income per share, diluted

 

$

0.36

 

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.42

 

 

$

0.37

 

 

$

0.42

 

 

$

0.54

 

 

$

0.41

 

 

$

0.43

 


  Three Months Ended 2017  Three Months Ended 2016 
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) December 31  September 30  June 30  March 31  December 31  September 30  June 30  March 31 
Interest income $6,191  $6,001  $5,713  $5,415  $5,569  $5,423  $5,325  $5,257 
Interest expense  556   515   509   469   489   458   456   440 
Net interest income  5,635   5,486   5,204   4,946   5,080   4,965   4,869   4,817 
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses  125   110   235   50      425   (1,133)  200 
Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses  5,510   5,376   4,969   4,896   5,080   4,540   6,002   4,617 
Other income  1,380   1,290   1,393   1,405   1,283   1,290   1,337   1,386 
Gain on sale and call of securities                 1       
Other expense  5,288   4,998   5,150   5,408   5,357   5,017   5,215   5,336 
Income before income taxes  1,602   1,668   1,212   893   1,006   814   2,124   667 
Income tax expense  2,145   387   222   125   198   116   562   61 
Net income (loss) $(543) $1,281  $990  $768  $808  $698  $1,562  $606 
                                 
Net income (loss) per share, basic $(0.14) $0.34  $0.26  $0.20  $0.22  $0.19  $0.42  $0.16 
Net income (loss) per share, diluted $(0.14) $0.34  $0.26  $0.20  $0.22  $0.19  $0.42  $0.16 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


NET INTEREST INCOME AND EXPENSE


2017

2020 COMPARED WITH 2016

2019

Net interest income increased to $21.3$25.8 million for the year ended December 31, 20172020 from $19.7$24.7 million for the same period of 2016.2019. The netnet interest margin was 3.66%3.46% for the year ended December 31, 20172020 compared to 3.50%3.74% for the same period in 2016.2019.

Interest income decreased while average earning assets increased from $660.8 million in 2019 to $747.4 million in 2020.  The decrease of 63 basis points (“bp”) in the average yield on assets from 4.43% in 2019 to 3.80% in 2020 was primarily the result of:

Average loans increased $60.0 million from $544.9 million in 2019 to $604.9 million in 2020. The tax-equivalent yield on loans decreased to 4.33% in 2020 compared to 4.84% in 2019. Together, interest and fee income from loans decreased $206,000 for 2020 compared with 2019.  While average loan balances increased as a result of organic loan growth as well as approximately $34.7 million of average outstanding loan balances related to PPP loans, loan yields decreased as a result of the lower interest rate environment and the fixed rate of 1% on PPP loans.


Average securities increased $9.2 million from $74.8 million in 2019 to $84.0 million in 2020. The tax-equivalent yield on securities decreased to 2.52% in 2020 compared to 2.81% in 2019. Tax-equivalent interest and dividend income on securities remained relatively unchanged at $2.1 million for 2020 and 2019.

Total interest expense decreased $2.0 million from $4.5 million in 2019 to $2.5 million in 2020, resulting in the average rate on total interest-bearing liabilities decreasing from 0.88% in 2019 to 0.46% in 2020, and cost of funds decreasing from 0.71% in 2019 to 0.35% in 2020.  As described below, the decreases in the cost of funds were the result of the Company’s response to interest rate trends and the reduction of rates on certain interest-bearing transaction accounts, and lower funding costs on FHLB advances.  The increasedecrease in interest expense from 2019 to 2020 was due primarily to the following:  

Average interest-bearing deposits increased $50.8 million from $481.9 million in 2019 to $532.8 million in 2020.  The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased from 0.75% in 2019 to 0.39% in 2020.  This resulted in a decrease in interest paid on deposits of $1.5 million from $3.6 million in 2019 to $2.1 million in 2020.  The increase in interest-bearing deposit balances was primarily the result of organic deposit growth from new and existing personal and business clients.  

Average FHLB advances decreased $6.3 million from $27.6 million in 2019 to $21.3 million in 2020.  Interest expense on FHLB advances decreased $421,000 from $712,000 in 2019 to $291,000 in 2020.  

The Company believes that, given the current interest rate environment, net interest income and the net interest margin could decrease in future periods.  

28


Table of Contents

2019 COMPARED WITH 2018

Net interest income increased to $24.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 from $23.5 million for the same period of 2018. The net interest margin was 3.74% for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 3.81% for the same period in 2018.

Interest income increased as the result of an overall increase in average earning assets from $568.9$619.1 million in 20162018 to $587.7$660.8 million in 2017,2019, a direct result of management'smanagement’s emphasis on growing the loan and securities portfolio and an increase in the interest rate environment during 2017.  These following factors contributed to anportfolios.  The increase of 17 basis points (“bp”) in10 bps in the average yield on assets from 3.83%4.33% in 20162018 to 4.00%4.43% in 2017:

2019 was primarily the result of:

Average loans increased $18.3 $27.2 million or 4.0% from $453.2$517.7 million in 20162018 to $471.5$544.9 million in 2017.2019. The tax-equivalent yield on loans increased increased to 4.49%4.84% in 20172019 compared to 4.42%4.69% in 2016.2018. Together, this resulted in a $1.2 million increase in interest and fee income from loans increased $2.1 million for 20172019 compared with 2016.

2018.

Average securities increased $11.5 million $184,000 from $52.2$74.6 million in 20162018 to $63.6$74.8 million in 2017.2019. The tax-equivalent yield on investments increased from 2.68%remained unchanged at 2.81% in 20162019 compared to 2.86% in 2017.2018. Tax-equivalent interest and dividend income on securities increased $424,000decreased $11,000 from 20162018 to 2017.

2019.

Interest income on deposits at other banks increased from $338,000 in 2016 to $529,000 in 2017 due to the increase in the average yield from 0.53% in 2016 to 1.01% in 2017.

Total interest expense increased $206,000 or 11.2% $1.3 million from $1.84$3.2 million in 20162018 to $2.05$4.5 million in 2017,2019, resulting in the average rate on total interest-bearing liabilities increasing from 0.41%0.67% in 20162018 to 0.45%0.88% in 2017,2019, due primarily to the following:

Interest

Average interest-bearing deposits increased $27.8 million from $454.0 million in 2018 to $481.9 million in 2019.  The average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits increased $280,000 or 21.2% from $1.3 million0.54% in 20162018 to $1.6 million0.75% in 2017. Average NOW balances increased $2.8 million from 2016 to 2017 while the yield on NOW accounts increased 5 bp from 0.23% in 2016 to 0.28% in 2017, resulting2019.  This resulted in an increase in interest expensepaid on deposits of $120,000 in 2017.  Average money market accounts decreased $851,000 from 2016 to 2017, while the yield remained at 0.21% for both respective years, resulting in relatively flat interest expense in 2017. Average savings accounts increased $2.1$1.1 million from 2016$2.4 million in 2018 to 2017, while the yield increased 3 bp from 0.10%$3.6 million in 2016 to 0.13% in 2017. Average time deposits increased $1.7 million from 2016 to 2017 while the yield increased 18 bp from 0.88% to 1.06%, resulting in an increase of $133,000 in interest expense from 2016 to 2017.

2019.

Interest expense on

Average FHLB advances decreased $75,000advances increased $4.3 million from 2016 to 2017 due to a $3.1 million decrease in average balances over the same time periods. 

The interest expense on junior subordinated debt remained relatively flat when comparing 2016 to 2017.

2016 COMPARED WITH 2015
Net interest income remained relatively flat at $19.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The flat net interest income was the result of a decrease in interest income being equally offset by a decrease in interest expense as described below. The Company's net interest margin decreased from 3.62% in 2015 to 3.50% in 2016. Total average earning assets increased from $550.9 million in 2015 to $568.9 million in 2016. The percentage of average earning assets to total assets increased from 92.1% in 2015 to 92.2% in 2016.

Total interest income decreased $121,000 or 0.56% to $21.6 million in 2016 from $21.7 million in 2015. This decrease was due to the 15 bp decrease in the average yield on assets, partially offset by the increase in total average earning assets of $18.0 million or 3.27%, from 2015 to 2016. The yield on earning assets declined from 3.98% in 2015 to 3.83% in 2016 due to the decline in market interest rates in the economy at large over the last seven years.
Average loans increased $1.5 million or 0.33% from $451.8$23.3 million in 20152018 to $453.2$27.6 million in 2016. The tax-equivalent  yield on loans decreased to 4.42% in 2016 compared with 4.48% in 2015. Together, this resulted in a $157,000 decrease in interest and fee income from loans for 2016 compared with 2015. On a tax-equivalent basis, the year-to-year decrease in interest and fee income on loans was $186,000.
Average securities decreased $5.5 million from $57.7 million in 2015 to $52.2 million in 2016. The tax-equivalent yield on securities decreased from 2.71% in 2015 to 2.68% in 2016. Together, interest and dividend income on securities decreased $165,000 from 2015 to 2016 on a tax-equivalent basis.
Interest income on deposits at other banks increased from $139,000 in 2015 to $338,000 in 2016 due to the increase in average balances from $41.5 million in 2015 to $63.5 million in 2016 and an increase in yield from 0.34% in 2015 to 0.53% in 2016.

Total interest expense decreased $119,000 or 6.1% from $2.0 million in 2015 to $1.8 million in 2016, resulting in a decrease in rate on total interest-bearing liabilities from 0.45% in 2015 to 0.41% in 2016, primarily due to the replacement of more costly time deposits with less expensive demand deposit accounts, NOW accounts and savings deposits.
Interest paid on deposits decreased $111,000 or 7.8% from $1.4 million in 2015 to $1.3 million in 2016. Average NOW deposit balances increased $19.9 million from 2015 to 2016 while the yield increased from 0.21% during 2015 to 0.23% during 2016, resulting in $92,000 more interest expense in 2016. Average money market accounts increased $1.7 million from 2015 to 2016, and the yield remained at 0.21% for both respective years, resulting in $3,000 more interest expense in 2016. Average savings accounts increased $2.0 million from 2015 to 2016, and the yield on savings accounts remained at 0.10%, resulting in no interest expense change in 2016. Average time deposits decreased $6.0 million from 2015 to 2016 while the yield decreased from 1.10% to 0.88%, resulting in a decrease of $206,000 in interest expense from 2015 to 2016.
2019.  Interest expense on FHLB advances decreased $1,000 dueincreased $171,000 from $541,000 in 2018 to $70,000 of amortization. $712,000 in 2019.  

The interest expense on junior subordinated debt increased from $199,000 in 2015 to $200,000 in 2016.

The following table sets forth, on a tax-equivalent basis, information relating to the Company’s average balance sheet and reflects the average yield on assets and average cost of liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 and the average yields and rates paid for the periods indicated. These yields and costs are derived by dividing income or expense by the average daily balances of assets and liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented.

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Average

 

 

Income/

 

 

Average

 

 

Average

 

 

Income/

 

 

Average

 

 

Average

 

 

Income/

 

 

Average

 

Assets

 

Balances

 

 

Expense

 

 

Rate

 

 

Balances

 

 

Expense

 

 

Rate

 

 

Balances

 

 

Expense

 

 

Rate

 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

$

603,810

 

 

$

26,192

 

 

 

4.34

%

 

$

543,111

 

 

$

26,398

 

 

 

4.86

%

 

$

514,958

 

 

$

24,291

 

 

 

4.72

%

Nonaccrual (2)

 

 

1,125

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,834

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,770

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total loans

 

 

604,935

 

 

 

26,192

 

 

 

4.33

%

 

 

544,945

 

 

 

26,398

 

 

 

4.84

%

 

 

517,728

 

 

 

24,291

 

 

 

4.69

%

Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

 

65,949

 

 

 

1,554

 

 

 

2.38

%

 

 

60,847

 

 

 

1,631

 

 

 

2.71

%

 

 

60,560

 

 

 

1,622

 

 

 

2.68

%

Tax-exempt (1)

 

 

18,041

 

 

 

545

 

 

 

3.02

%

 

 

13,956

 

 

 

454

 

 

 

3.25

%

 

 

14,059

 

 

 

474

 

 

 

3.37

%

Total securities

 

 

83,990

 

 

 

2,099

 

 

 

2.52

%

 

 

74,803

 

 

 

2,085

 

 

 

2.81

%

 

 

74,619

 

 

 

2,096

 

 

 

2.81

%

Deposits in other banks

 

 

58,460

 

 

 

135

 

 

 

0.23

%

 

 

41,077

 

 

 

782

 

 

 

1.90

%

 

 

26,777

 

 

 

410

 

 

 

1.53

%

Federal funds sold

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.35

%

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2.31

%

 

 

14

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1.59

%

Total earning assets

 

 

747,399

 

 

 

28,426

 

 

 

3.80

%

 

 

660,839

 

 

 

29,265

 

 

 

4.43

%

 

 

619,138

 

 

 

26,797

 

 

 

4.33

%

Less: Allowance for loan losses

 

 

(6,149

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,429

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(5,317

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total nonearning assets

 

 

59,367

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

50,848

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

$

800,617

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

712,410

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

664,669

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demand

 

$

159,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

121,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

117,422

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW

 

 

252,648

 

 

$

493

 

 

 

0.20

%

 

 

230,081

 

 

$

1,028

 

 

 

0.45

%

 

 

231,819

 

 

$

893

 

 

 

0.39

%

Money market

 

 

105,218

 

 

 

420

 

 

 

0.40

%

 

 

78,097

 

 

 

645

 

 

 

0.83

%

 

 

59,400

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

0.52

%

Savings

 

 

102,862

 

 

 

94

 

 

 

0.09

%

 

 

87,478

 

 

 

281

 

 

 

0.32

%

 

 

89,103

 

 

 

235

 

 

 

0.26

%

Time deposits

 

 

72,095

 

 

 

1,057

 

 

 

1.47

%

 

 

86,205

 

 

 

1,641

 

 

 

1.90

%

 

 

73,717

 

 

 

1,009

 

 

 

1.37

%

Total interest-bearing deposits

 

 

532,823

 

 

 

2,064

 

 

 

0.39

%

 

 

481,861

 

 

 

3,595

 

 

 

0.75

%

 

 

454,039

 

 

 

2,447

 

 

 

0.54

%

Federal funds purchased

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.05

%

 

 

494

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

2.90

%

 

 

2,044

 

 

 

46

 

 

 

2.26

%

FHLB advances

 

 

21,324

 

 

 

291

 

 

 

1.37

%

 

 

27,611

 

 

 

712

 

 

 

2.58

%

 

 

23,315

 

 

 

541

 

 

 

2.32

%

Junior subordinated debt

 

 

4,124

 

 

 

186

 

 

 

4.50

%

 

 

4,124

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

4.83

%

 

 

4,124

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

4.83

%

Total interest-bearing liabilities

 

 

558,272

 

 

 

2,541

 

 

 

0.46

%

 

 

514,090

 

 

 

4,520

 

 

 

0.88

%

 

 

483,522

 

 

 

3,233

 

 

 

0.67

%

Other liabilities

 

 

11,968

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12,331

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,088

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareholders' equity

 

 

70,709

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

64,079

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

57,637

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

$

800,617

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

712,410

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

664,669

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income (tax-equivalent basis)

 

 

 

 

 

$

25,885

 

 

 

3.35

%

 

 

 

 

 

$

24,745

 

 

 

3.55

%

 

 

 

 

 

$

23,564

 

 

 

3.66

%

Less: tax equivalent adjustment

 

 

 

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

95

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

 

 

Net interest income

 

 

 

 

 

$

25,771

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

24,650

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

23,465

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense as a percent of average earning assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.34

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.68

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.52

%

Net interest margin

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.46

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.74

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3.81

%


(Dollars in thousands) December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Assets 
Average
Balances
  
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balances
  
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
  
Average
Balances
  
Income/
Expense
  
Average
Rate
 
Loans                           
Taxable $466,513  $21,075   4.52% $446,094  $19,783   4.43% $443,303  $19,884   4.49%
Tax-exempt (1)
  2,068   108   5.24%  4,716   253   5.36%  6,007   338   5.63%
Nonaccrual (2)
  2,953          2,436          2,457        
Total Loans  471,534   21,183   4.49%  453,246   20,036   4.42%  451,767   20,222   4.48%
Securities                                    
Taxable  51,824   1,303   2.52%  46,501   1,076   2.32%  51,722   1,230   2.38%
Tax-exempt (1)
  11,799   517   4.38%  5,649   320   5.66%  5,946   331   5.57%
Total securities  63,623   1,820   2.86%  52,150   1,396   2.68%  57,668   1,561   2.71%
Deposits in other banks  52,532   529   1.01%  63,534   338   0.53%  41,480   139   0.34%
Federal funds sold  9   
   0.94%  9      0.37%  9      0.17%
Total earning assets  587,698   23,532   4.00%  568,939   21,770   3.83%  550,924   21,922   3.98%
Less: Allowance for loan losses  (4,534)          (4,695)          (5,730)        
Cash and due from banks  4,903           4,728           5,308         
Premises and equipment, net  18,979           19,990           20,807         
Other real estate owned, net  1,356           1,384           1,516         
Other assets  25,405           26,447           25,536         
Total Assets $633,807          $616,793          $598,361         
Liabilities & Shareholders’ Equity                                    
Deposits                                    
Demand $114,910          $102,403          $96,538         
Interest-bearing                                    
NOW  233,963   655   0.28%  231,142   535   0.23%  211,273   443   0.21%
Money market  53,660   112   0.21%  54,511   115   0.21%  52,787   112   0.21%
Savings  86,806   115   0.13%  84,660   85   0.10%  82,626   85   0.10%
Time  67,716   717   1.06%  66,027   584   0.88%  72,056   790   1.10%
Total interest-bearing deposits  442,145   1,599   0.36%  436,340   1,319   0.30%  418,742   1,430   0.34%
Federal  funds purchased  111   2   1.41%  2      0.99%  1,415      0.53%
FHLB advances  9,829   249   2.54%  12,971   324   2.50%  13,041   325   2.49%
Junior subordinated debt  4,124   199   4.83%  4,124   200   4.84%  4,124   199   4.83%
Total interest-bearing liabilities  456,209   2,049   0.45%  453,437   1,843   0.41%  437,322   1,962   0.45%
Other liabilities  6,467           7,114           8,543         
Shareholders' equity  56,221           53,839           55,958         
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity $633,807          $616,793          $598,361         
Net interest income      21,483   3.55%      19,927   3.42%      19,960   3.53%
Less: tax-equivalent adjustment      212           196           228     
Net interest income     $21,271          $19,731          $19,732     
Interest expense as a percent of average earning assets          0.35%          0.32%          0.36%
Net interest margin          3.66%          3.50%          3.62%

(1)

Income and rates on non-taxablenontaxable assets are computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34%21%.

(2)

Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of total loans and total earning assets.


RATE/VOLUME ANALYSIS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding changes in interest income and interest expense of the Company for the periods indicated. For each category of interest-earning asset and interest-bearing liability, information is provided on changes attributable to changes in volume (change in volume multiplied by old rate); and changes in rates (change in rate multiplied by old volume). Changes in rate-volume, which cannot be separately identified, are allocated proportionately between changes in rate and changes in volume.

 

 

2020 Compared to 2019

 

 

2019 Compared to 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due to

 

 

Due to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Due to

 

 

Due to

 

(In thousands)

 

Change

 

 

Volume

 

 

Rate

 

 

Change

 

 

Volume

 

 

Rate

 

Interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

$

(206

)

 

$

2,953

 

 

$

(3,159

)

 

$

2,107

 

 

$

1,328

 

 

$

779

 

Securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable

 

 

(77

)

 

 

136

 

 

 

(213

)

 

 

9

 

 

 

7

 

 

 

2

 

Tax-exempt (1)

 

 

91

 

 

 

133

 

 

 

(42

)

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(3

)

 

 

(17

)

Deposits in other banks

 

 

(647

)

 

 

331

 

 

 

(978

)

 

 

372

 

 

 

219

 

 

 

153

 

Total interest income

 

 

(839

)

 

 

3,553

 

 

 

(4,392

)

 

 

2,468

 

 

 

1,551

 

 

 

917

 

Interest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW

 

 

(535

)

 

 

101

 

 

 

(636

)

 

 

135

 

 

 

(7

)

 

 

142

 

Money market

 

 

(225

)

 

 

224

 

 

 

(449

)

 

 

335

 

 

 

98

 

 

 

237

 

Savings

 

 

(187

)

 

 

49

 

 

 

(236

)

 

 

46

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

50

 

Time deposits

 

 

(584

)

 

 

(269

)

 

 

(315

)

 

 

632

 

 

 

171

 

 

 

461

 

Federal funds purchased

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(32

)

 

 

(35

)

 

 

3

 

FHLB advances

 

 

(421

)

 

 

(163

)

 

 

(258

)

 

 

171

 

 

 

99

 

 

 

72

 

Junior subordinated debt

 

 

(13

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

(13

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total interest expense

 

 

(1,979

)

 

 

(72

)

 

 

(1,907

)

 

 

1,287

 

 

 

322

 

 

 

965

 

Net interest income

 

$

1,140

 

 

$

3,625

 

 

$

(2,485

)

 

$

1,181

 

 

$

1,229

 

 

$

(48

)


  2017 Compared to 2016  2016 Compared to 2015 
(Dollars in thousands) Change  Due to Volume  Due to Rate  Change  Due to Volume  Due to Rate 
Interest Income                  
Loans; taxable $1,292  $906  $386  $(101) $125  $(226)
Loans; tax-exempt (1)
  (145)  (142)  (3)  (85)  (73)  (12)
Securities; taxable  227   123   104   (154)  (124)  (30)
Securities; tax-exempt (1)
  197   348   (151)  (11)  (16)  5 
Deposits in other banks  191   (59)  250   199   74   125 
Total Interest Income  1,762   1,176   586   (152)  (14)  (138)
Interest Expense                        
NOW accounts  120   7   113   92   42   50 
Money market accounts  (3)  (2)  (1)  3   4   (1)
Savings accounts  30   2   28      2   (2)
Time deposits  133   15   118   (206)  (66)  (140)
Federal funds purchased  2      2   (8)  (8)   
FHLB advances  (75)  (79)  4   (1)  (2)  1 
Junior subordinated debt  (1)     (1)  1      1 
Total Interest Expense  206   (57)  263   (119)  (28)  (91)
Net Interest Income $1,556  $1,233  $323  $(33) $14  $(47)

(1)

Income and rates on non-taxablenontaxable assets are computed on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal tax rate of 34%21%.

NONINTEREST INCOME

 

 

December 31,

 

 

Increase (Decrease) 2020 vs. 2019

 

 

Increase (Decrease) 2019 vs. 2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

Amount

 

 

Percent

 

 

Amount

 

 

Percent

 

Noninterest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trust and estate fees

 

$

2,249

 

 

$

1,743

 

 

$

1,542

 

 

$

506

 

 

 

29.0

%

 

$

201

 

 

 

13.0

%

Brokerage fees

 

 

557

 

 

 

453

 

 

 

180

 

 

 

104

 

 

 

23.0

%

 

 

273

 

 

 

151.7

%

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

 

1,118

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

1,706

 

 

 

(404

)

 

 

(26.5

)%

 

 

(184

)

 

 

(10.8

)%

Interchange fee income, net

 

 

1,215

 

 

 

1,305

 

 

 

1,252

 

 

 

(90

)

 

 

(6.9

)%

 

 

53

 

 

 

4.2

%

Bank-owned life insurance

 

 

360

 

 

 

366

 

 

 

361

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(1.6

)%

 

 

5

 

 

 

1.4

%

Gain on sale/call of securities available for sale, net

 

 

992

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

838

 

 

 

913

 

 

 

1155.7

%

 

 

(759

)

 

 

(90.6

)%

Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale, net

 

 

86

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

37

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

24.6

%

 

 

32

 

 

 

86.5

%

Other income

 

 

(111

)

 

 

437

 

 

 

158

 

 

 

(548

)

 

 

(125.4

)%

 

 

279

 

 

 

176.6

%

 

 

$

6,466

 

 

$

5,974

 

 

$

6,074

 

 

$

492

 

 

 

8.2

%

 

$

(100

)

 

 

(1.6

)%

2020 COMPARED WITH 2019

Total noninterest income increased $492,000 from $6.0 million in 2019 to $6.5 million in 2020.  The following were the primary changes in noninterest income:

Trust, estate and brokerage fees increased as a result of an increase in assets under management for both trust and investment management accounts and brokerage accounts.  Assets under management were $530.8 million at December 31, 2020 compared to $455.0 million at December 31, 2019.


Service charges on deposit accounts continued to decline as a result of the decline in non-sufficient funds (“NSF”) fees which is directly related to customer behavior.  NSF fees were $978,000 in 2020 compared to $1.5 million in 2019.  

31


Table of Contents

During 2020, the net gain on the sale of securities available for sale was the result of a portfolio reallocation to align with the Company’s investment goals.  During 2019, the gain on calls of securities available for sale was the result of two calls of trust preferred securities that went to auction and were settled at their par value.

Other income decreased primarily as a result of several factors.  Automated teller machine (“ATM”) surcharge income decreased $81,000 when compared to 2019, due to the Company outsourcing this activity.  Losses on the disposal of these ATMs totaled $177,000 during 2020. Partnership income, which is primarily derived from the Bank’s ownership interest in Bankers Insurance, LLC, increased $112,000 when compared to 2019.  The increase in this income was partially offset by an increase of $172,000 in pass-through losses from the Bank’s investment in qualified affordable housing projects.    

2019 COMPARED WITH 2018

Total noninterest income decreased $100,000 from $6.1 million in 2018 to $6.0 million in 2019.  The following were the primary changes in noninterest income:

Trust, estate and brokerage fees increased as a result of increased brokerage production and increased assets under management.  Assets under management were $455.0 million at December 31, 2019 compared to $325.5 million at December 31, 2018.

Service charges on deposit accounts continued to decline due to customer behavior and increased mobile banking usage.  

The decrease in the net gains on the sale of securities available for sale in 2019 was due to the Company’s portfolio reallocation to align with its investment goals and the gain on calls of securities available for sale in 2018 which was the result of two calls of trust preferred securities that went to auction and were settled at their par value.

The net gain on mortgage loans held for sale increased as a result of increased loans sold on the secondary market.  Loans originated for sale on the secondary market were $5.4 million in 2019 compared to $2.0 million in 2018.

Other income increased as a result of decreased net losses on partnerships of $32,000, gains from the sale of property of $139,000, income received from the sale of an equity ownership interest of $39,000 and income of $69,000 received from contract negotiations with a new broker/dealer which is recognized over the life of the contract.    

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

Increase (Decrease) 2020 vs. 2019

 

 

Increase (Decrease) 2019 vs. 2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

Amount

 

 

Percent

 

 

Amount

 

 

Percent

 

Noninterest Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

$

12,103

 

 

$

12,084

 

 

$

12,108

 

 

$

19

 

 

 

0.2

%

 

$

(24

)

 

 

(0.2

)%

Occupancy

 

 

2,409

 

 

 

2,352

 

 

 

2,331

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

2.4

%

 

 

21

 

 

 

0.9

%

Furniture and equipment

 

 

776

 

 

 

1,050

 

 

 

1,012

 

 

 

(274

)

 

 

(26.1

)%

 

 

38

 

 

 

3.8

%

Marketing and business development

 

 

487

 

 

 

648

 

 

 

610

 

 

 

(161

)

 

 

(24.8

)%

 

 

38

 

 

 

6.2

%

Legal, audit and consulting

 

 

1,129

 

 

 

1,054

 

 

 

1,015

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

7.1

%

 

 

39

 

 

 

3.8

%

Data processing

 

 

1,432

 

 

 

1,381

 

 

 

1,292

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

3.7

%

 

 

89

 

 

 

6.9

%

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessment

 

 

388

 

 

 

190

 

 

 

369

 

 

 

198

 

 

 

104.2

%

 

 

(179

)

 

 

(48.5

)%

Merger related expenses

 

 

1,231

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,231

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.0

%

Prepayment penalty on early debt extinguishment

 

 

-

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

(268

)

 

 

-

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

-

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

3,565

 

 

 

3,427

 

 

 

3,414

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

4.0

%

 

 

13

 

 

 

0.4

%

 

 

$

23,520

 

 

$

22,454

 

 

$

22,151

 

 

$

1,066

 

 

 

4.7

%

 

$

303

 

 

 

1.4

%

2020 COMPARED WITH 2019

Total noninterest expense increased $1.1 million from $22.5 million in 2019 to $23.5 million in 2020. Management continued to strive for increased efficiencies through process improvements and expense monitoring.  The following were the primary changes in noninterest expense:

Furniture and equipment expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in depreciation associated with the ATMs, as noted above in noninterest income, that were removed due to the Bank’s outsourcing this activity.  Depreciation expense for furniture and equipment was $113,000 for 2020 compared to $323,000 for 2019.  

Marketing expenses decreased by $92,000 primarily due to timing differences in marketing campaigns.  Business development activities decreased $60,000, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.      

FDIC deposit insurance assessment increased as a result of the Small Bank Assessment Credit of $162,000 that was received in 2019.  This credit is the portion of the Company’s assessment that contributed to the growth in the DIF reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%.

32


Table of Contents

Merger expenses of $1.2 million are related to the Merger with Virginia National, announced on October 1, 2020.  The Company expects to continue to incur merger expenses until the Merger with Virginia National is completed, which is currently expected to occur in the second quarter of 2021.

2019 COMPARED WITH 2018

Total noninterest expense increased $303,000 from $22.2 million in 2018 to $22.5 million in 2019. Management continued to strive for increased efficiencies through process improvements and expense monitoring.  The following were the primary changes in noninterest expense:

While the Company’s personnel expenses were its largest noninterest expense, total salary and benefit expenses remained relatively flat.

Occupancy, furniture and equipment expenses remained relatively unchanged.

Marketing and business development expenses increased slightly as a result of advertising campaigns, business development opportunities and community support.

Consulting expense, which includes legal and auditing fees, remained relatively unchanged.

FDIC deposit insurance assessment decreased as a result of the Small Bank Assessment Credit.  This credit is the portion of the Company’s assessment that contributed to the growth in the DIF reserve ratio from 1.15% to 1.35%.

The Company incurred prepayment penalties on the early extinguishment of $13.0 million of FHLB advances.  

Other operating expenses remained relatively unchanged.

INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense for 2020 was $1.1 million, resulting in an effective tax rate of 15.4%, compared with $1.0 million or 12.8%, in 2019 and $746,000, or 10.8%, in 2018.  Income tax expense and the effective tax rate differed from the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% primarily due to the Bank’s investment in tax-exempt securities, income from bank-owned life insurance and community development tax credits.  Community development tax credits were $479,000, $552,000, and $504,000 for 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

ASSET QUALITY

GAAP requires that the impairment of loans

Loans that are separately identified as impaired is to beare measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows or, alternatively, the observable market price of the loans or the fair value of the collateral. However, for those loans that are collateral dependent and for which management has determined foreclosure is probable, the measure of impairment is to be based on the net realizable value of the collateral.


A loan is considered impaired when there is an identified weakness thatwhich makes it probable that the Bank will not be able to collectcollection of all principal and interest amounts according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.agreement will not be made. Factors involved in determining if a loan is impaired include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, financial condition of the borrower, and the current economic conditions.  A performing loan may be considered impaired if the factors above indicate a need for impairment. Loans are placed on nonaccrual when principal or interest is delinquent for 90 days or more, unless the loans are well secured and in the process of collection, or if the shortfall in payment is insignificant.  A delay of less than 30 days or a shortfall of less than 5% of the required principal and interest payments generally is considered “insignificant” and would not indicate an impairment situation, if in management’s judgment the loan will be paid in full. Loans that meet the regulatory definitions ofare considered doubtful or loss generally qualify as impaired loans. As is the case for all loans, charge-offs occur when the loan or portion of the loan is determined to be uncollectible.


Nonperforming assets, in most cases, consist of nonaccrual loans, troubled debt restructure (“TDR”) loans, other real estate owned (“OREO”),TDRs, OREO, and loans that are greater than 90 days past due and accruing interest, and investments that areinterest.

As mentioned above, in response to COVID-19, the Company established a short-term loan modification program, which included the deferral of scheduled payments for a 90-day period.  Borrowers who were considered OTTI. Management evaluates allcurrent were ones whose loans and investments that are greaterwere less than 9030 days past due as well as borrowers that have suffered financial distress, to determine if they should be placed on nonaccrual.


The Bank considers all consumer installmenttheir contractual payments at the time the modification was entered.  As of December 31, 2020, there was one loan modification totaling $2.6 million and 5 loans in payment deferral totaling $518,000.  These additional deferrals remained within the CARES Act and smaller residential mortgage loans to be homogenous loans. These loans arethe March 2020 interagency guidance and were not subject to individual evaluation for impairment unless the loan is identified as TDR.  In determining a TDR status, management assesses whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and, if so, whether the Bank has granted a concession to the borrower by modifying the loan.  Once a loan has been identified as a TDR, it remains so until it is paid off according to the modified terms or until it reverts to the terms and conditions of the original contract.

15
considered TDRs.

33


The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s nonperforming assets:assets at the dates indicated:

 

 

At December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Nonaccrual loans

 

$

1,245

 

 

$

989

 

 

$

1,993

 

 

$

3,180

 

 

$

3,523

 

TDR loans still accruing

 

 

8,363

 

 

 

2,471

 

 

 

3,361

 

 

 

4,182

 

 

 

5,305

 

Loans 90+ days past due and accruing

 

 

584

 

 

 

1,636

 

 

 

1,227

 

 

 

1,665

 

 

 

2,859

 

Total nonperforming loans

 

 

10,192

 

 

 

5,096

 

 

 

6,581

 

 

 

9,027

 

 

 

11,687

 

OREO, net

 

 

1,356

 

 

 

1,356

 

 

 

1,356

 

 

 

1,356

 

 

 

1,356

 

Total nonperforming assets

 

$

11,548

 

 

$

6,452

 

 

$

7,937

 

 

$

10,383

 

 

$

13,043

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses to total loans

 

 

1.11

%

 

 

0.95

%

 

 

0.94

%

 

 

1.00

%

 

 

1.00

%

Nonaccrual loans to total loans

 

 

0.20

%

 

 

0.18

%

 

 

0.36

%

 

 

0.60

%

 

 

0.80

%

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans

 

 

67.41

%

 

 

102.57

%

 

 

78.65

%

 

 

56.40

%

 

 

38.70

%

Nonperforming loans to total loans

 

 

1.65

%

 

 

0.93

%

 

 

1.20

%

 

 

1.80

%

 

 

2.50

%

Nonperforming assets to total assets

 

 

1.33

%

 

 

0.89

%

 

 

1.09

%

 

 

1.60

%

 

 

2.10

%


  At December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands) 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
Nonaccrual loans $3,180  $3,523  $1,849  $1,227  $2,184 
Restructured loans still accruing  4,182   5,305   5,495   7,431   8,613 
Student loans greater than 90 days past due and still accruing  1,616   2,538   2,814   4,551   7,917 
Loans greater than 90 days past due and still accruing  49   321         506 
Total nonperforming loans  9,027   11,687   10,158   13,209   19,220 
Nonperforming corporate bond, at fair value              1,300 
Other real estate owned, net  1,356   1,356   1,356   1,406   4,085 
Total nonperforming assets $10,383  $13,043  $11,514  $14,615  $24,605 
                     
Allowance for loan losses to total loans  1.01%  0.98%  0.94%  1.22%  1.48%
Nonaccrual loans to total loans  0.63%  0.76%  0.41%  0.28%  0.48%
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans  56.43%  38.72%  41.28%  40.81%  34.69%
Nonperforming loans to total loans  1.46%  2.52%  2.27%  3.00%  4.26%
Nonperforming assets to total assets  1.61%  2.09%  1.91%  2.41%  4.00%

Nonperforming assets totaled $10.4 million or 1.61%, $13.0 million or 2.09% and $11.5 million or 1.91%1.33% of total assets at December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015, respectively.$6.5 million or 0.89% of total assets at December 31, 2019.  The ratio of allowance for loan losses as a percentage of nonperforming loans was 56.43%,  38.72%67.41% and 41.28%102.57% at December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively. Factors contributing to these changes are:

Nonaccrual loans were $3.2 million, $3.5$1.2 million and $1.8$1.0 million at December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015,2019, respectively. The primary changesChanges in nonaccrual loans during 2017 include2020 was the payoff result of a $1.0 million, 1-4 family residential loan, the charge-off of one 1-4 family residential loan andprincipal curtailment for one commercial real estate loan bothloans totaling $615,000 that were previously on nonaccrual status at December 31, 2016,$632,000, offset by the addition of $1.7 million in one commercial and industrial loan totaling $509,000 and one residential real estate loan and one 1-4 family residential loan totaling $1.7 million.

$379,000.    

OREO remainsremained unchanged at $1.36$1.4 million, consisting of one 47-acre tract of undeveloped property.

Loans greater than 90 or more days past due and still accruing interest totaled $584,000 and $1.6 million at December 31, 2017, consisting of one 47 acre tract of undeveloped property.

Student2020 and 2019, respectively.  Included are $583,000 and $1.2 million in student loans at December 31, 2020 and 2019 that were greater than 90 days past due and still accruing interest totaled $1.6 million, $2.5 million and $2.8 million at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Theseinterest. Student loans that are past due continue to accrue interest when past due because repayment of both principal and accrued interest areto the 98% guaranteedguarantee by the U.S. Department of Education.

Excluding student loans, loans that

There were 90 days past due and accruing interest totaled $49,000 and $321,000 at December 31, 2017 and 2016.  There were no loans, excluding student loans, that were greater than 90 days past due and accruing interest at December 31, 2015.

There are 10five loans in the portfolio totaling $5.6$8.4 million that have beenwere identified as TDRs (non-COVID related) at December 31, 20172020 compared to 12five loans at $6.9 million at December 31. 2016 and four loans at $4.2$2.5 million at December 31, 2015.  No loans2019. One commercial and industrial loan was modified and identified as a TDR during 2020.  There were no loans modified and identified as TDRs during 2017 and 2016.2019.  At December 31, 2017, six of the TDR loans2020, all TDRs were current and performing in accordance with thetheir modified terms. Three of the TDRs, totaling $1.3 million to a single borrower, were in nonaccrual status due to prior irregular payments, but were paying in accordance with a bankruptcy plan.


ANALYSIS OF LOAN PORTFOLIOLOSS EXPERIENCE

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management periodically evaluates the collectability of the loan portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loan loss experience, impaired loans, and current economic conditions in determining the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is increased by the provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense, and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries.  Because of uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio and the related allowance remains subject to change. Additions to the allowance, recorded as the provision for loan losses on the Company’s statements of operations, are made, as needed, to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level based on management’s analysis. The amount of the provision is a function of the level of loans outstanding, the level and nature of impaired and nonperforming loans, historical loan loss experience, the amount of loan losses actually charged-off or recovered during a given period and current national and local economic conditions.  There can be no assurances, however, that future losses will not exceed estimated amounts, or that increased amounts of provisions for loan losses will not be required in future periods.

The allowance for loan losses was $6.9 million or 1.11% of total loans at December 31, 2020 compared to $5.2 million or 0.95% of total loans at December 31, 2019.  The provision for loan losses was $1.8 million and $346,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  The increase in the allowance for loan losses was due primarily to the increase in qualitative factors related to COVID-19 and the current economic conditions, including, but not limited to, the increased unemployment rate for the Commonwealth of Virginia.  The allowance for loan losses was not impacted by PPP loans during the year ended December 31, 2020 due to the 100% SBA guaranty for loans funded under this program.  

34


Table of Contents

While Management believes that adequate loan loss reserves existed as of December 31, 2020, Management also recognizes that the full impact of COVID-19 may have a continued adverse effect on the credit quality of the Company’s loan portfolio subsequent to 2020.

Impaired loans were $9.6 million and $3.6 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.   Reserves allocated to impaired loans were $72,000 and $229,000 at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  There are no loans other than those disclosed above either as nonperforming or impaired, where information known about the borrower has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrower’s ability to repay.  

The following table summarizes the Bank’s loan loss experience for the periods indicated:

 

 

Years ended December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Allowance for loan losses, January 1,

 

$

5,227

 

 

$

5,176

 

 

$

5,094

 

 

$

4,525

 

 

$

4,193

 

Charged-off loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

148

 

 

 

328

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

19

 

 

 

226

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

476

 

 

 

380

 

Construction and land

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

312

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Consumer

 

 

34

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

114

 

 

 

46

 

Student

 

 

15

 

 

 

13

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

31

 

 

 

36

 

Residential real estate

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

51

 

 

 

36

 

Home equity lines of credit

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total loans charged-off

 

 

197

 

 

 

391

 

 

 

783

 

 

 

691

 

 

 

724

 

Recoveries:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

 

13

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

35

 

 

 

154

 

 

 

1,527

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

24

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

575

 

 

 

24

 

Construction and land

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Consumer

 

 

30

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

2

 

 

 

10

 

Student

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Residential real estate

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

248

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

-

 

Home equity lines of credit

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Total loan recoveries

 

 

67

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

358

 

 

 

740

 

 

 

1,564

 

Net charge-offs (recoveries)

 

 

130

 

 

 

295

 

 

 

425

 

 

 

(49

)

 

 

(840

)

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

 

 

1,773

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

507

 

 

 

520

 

 

 

(508

)

Allowance for loan losses, December 31,

 

$

6,870

 

 

$

5,227

 

 

$

5,176

 

 

$

5,094

 

 

$

4,525

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans

 

 

0.02

%

 

 

0.05

%

 

 

0.08

%

 

 

(0.01

)%

 

 

(0.19

)%

The following table allocates the allowance for loan losses to each loan portfolio segment. The allowance has been allocated according to the amount deemed to be reasonably necessary to provide for the possibility of losses being incurred, although the entire allowance balance is available to absorb any actual charge-offs that may occur.

35


Table of Contents

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

 

Percentage of Total Loans

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

 

Percentage of Total Loans

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

 

Percentage of Total Loans

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

 

Percentage of Total Loans

 

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

 

Percentage of Total Loans

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

751

 

 

 

11.09

%

 

$

296

 

 

 

4.98

%

 

$

483

 

 

 

4.86

%

 

$

518

 

 

 

4.90

%

 

$

561

 

 

 

5.50

%

Commercial real estate

 

 

2,334

 

 

 

32.54

%

 

 

1,788

 

 

 

33.06

%

 

 

1,738

 

 

 

34.18

%

 

 

1,609

 

 

 

35.20

%

 

 

1,569

 

 

 

35.70

%

Construction and land

 

 

1,080

 

 

 

11.99

%

 

652

 

 

 

11.86

%

 

 

635

 

 

 

13.00

%

 

 

879

 

 

 

10.70

%

 

 

661

 

 

 

10.70

%

Consumer

 

 

126

 

 

 

1.03

%

 

154

 

 

 

1.08

%

 

145

 

 

 

1.01

%

 

105

 

 

 

1.00

%

 

21

 

 

 

0.70

%

Student

 

 

81

 

 

 

1.13

%

 

65

 

 

 

1.48

%

 

68

 

 

 

1.67

%

 

72

 

 

 

2.10

%

 

76

 

 

 

2.80

%

Residential real estate

 

 

1,839

 

 

 

37.44

%

 

 

1,596

 

 

 

40.95

%

 

 

1,311

 

 

 

37.49

%

 

1174

 

 

 

37.20

%

 

943

 

 

 

35.10

%

Home equity lines of credit

 

 

309

 

 

 

4.78

%

 

326

 

 

 

6.59

%

 

446

 

 

 

7.79

%

 

387

 

 

 

8.90

%

 

307

 

 

 

9.50

%

Unallocated

 

 

350

 

 

 

-

 

 

350

 

 

 

-

 

 

350

 

 

 

-

 

 

350

 

 

 

-

 

 

387

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

$

6,870

 

 

 

100.00

%

 

$

5,227

 

 

 

100.00

%

 

$

5,176

 

 

 

100.00

%

 

$

5,094

 

 

 

100.00

%

 

$

4,525

 

 

 

100.00

%

COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT DECEMBER 31, 2020 AND 2019

SUMMARY

A financial institution’s primary sources of revenue are generated by its earning assets and sales of financial assets, while its major expenses are produced by the funding of those assets with interest-bearing liabilities, provisions for loan losses and compensation to employees.  Effective management of these sources and uses of funds is essential in attaining a financial institution’s maximum profitability while maintaining an acceptable level of risk.

At December 31, 2017, 20162020, the Company had total assets of $867.2 million compared to $722.2 million at December 31, 2019.  The significant components of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets are discussed below.

SECURITIES

At December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2015,2018, the carrying values of securities available for sale at fair value were:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for Sale

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies

 

$

59,210

 

 

$

63,941

 

 

$

56,409

 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

23,638

 

 

 

15,842

 

 

 

14,580

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

895

 

Total

 

$

82,848

 

 

$

79,783

 

 

$

71,884

 

36


Table of Contents

The following is a schedule of estimated maturities, or call date if more probable, or next rate repricing adjustment date, and related weighted average yields of securities at December 31, 2020:

 

 

Due in one year or less

 

 

Due after

One through Five years

 

 

Due after

Five through Ten years

 

 

Due after Ten years

 

 

Total

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

 

Yield

 

 

Amount

 

 

Yield

 

 

Amount

 

 

Yield

 

 

Amount

 

 

Yield

 

 

Amount

 

 

Yield

 

Securities available for sale:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies

 

$

2,016

 

 

 

1.37

%

 

$

8,118

 

 

 

2.59

%

 

$

5,409

 

 

 

1.54

%

 

$

43,667

 

 

 

1.84

%

 

$

59,210

 

 

 

1.90

%

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

55

 

 

 

5.28

%

 

 

301

 

 

 

4.58

%

 

 

4,060

 

 

 

3.13

%

 

 

19,222

 

 

 

2.78

%

 

 

23,638

 

 

 

2.87

%

Total securities

 

$

2,071

 

 

 

1.48

%

 

$

8,419

 

 

 

2.66

%

 

$

9,469

 

 

 

2.22

%

 

$

62,889

 

 

 

2.13

%

 

$

82,848

 

 

 

2.18

%

Excluding obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies, there were no securities from a single issuer exceeding 10% of shareholders’ equity.

LOAN PORTFOLIO

Loans are made mainly to customers located within the Company’s primary market area. Loan pricing strategies and product offerings are continually modified in an effort to increase lending activity without sacrificing the existing credit quality standards.  At December 31, 2020 and 2019, net loans accounted for 77.2%, 73.4%were 70.33% and 73.6%75.46% of total assets, respectively, and were the largest category of the Company’s earning assets. Loans are shown on the balance sheets net of unearned discounts and the allowance for loan losses. Interest is computed by methods that result in level rates of return on principal. Loans are charged-off when deemed by management to be uncollectible, after taking into consideration such factors as the current financial condition of the customer and the underlying collateral and guarantees.


Total loans on the balance sheet are comprised of the following classifications:portfolio segments at the dates indicated:

 

 

At December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

Commercial and industrial loans

 

$

68,390

 

 

$

27,404

 

 

$

26,721

 

 

$

24,413

 

 

$

25,735

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

200,690

 

 

 

181,898

 

 

 

187,797

 

 

 

176,827

 

 

 

165,271

 

Construction and land

 

 

73,966

 

 

 

65,231

 

 

 

71,409

 

 

 

54,162

 

 

 

49,777

 

Consumer

 

 

6,355

 

 

 

5,958

 

 

 

5,562

 

 

 

5,068

 

 

 

3,100

 

Student

 

 

6,971

 

 

 

8,151

 

 

 

9,158

 

 

 

10,677

 

 

 

13,006

 

Residential real estate

 

 

230,885

 

 

 

225,316

 

 

 

205,945

 

 

 

187,104

 

 

 

162,383

 

Home equity lines of credit

 

 

29,492

 

 

 

36,268

 

 

 

42,772

 

 

 

44,548

 

 

 

43,861

 

Total loans

 

$

616,749

 

 

$

550,226

 

 

$

549,364

 

 

$

502,799

 

 

$

463,133

 


  December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands) 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
Loans secured by real estate:               
Construction and land $54,162  $49,777  $49,855  $39,085  $32,807 
Residential real estate  187,104   162,383   150,575   143,477   142,256 
Home equity lines of credit  44,548   43,861   44,013   42,732   43,476 
Commercial real estate  176,827   165,271   160,036   165,528   176,320 
Commercial and industrial loans  24,413   25,735   23,705   26,924   24,746 
Consumer  5,068   3,100   3,160   3,015   3,810 
Student  10,677   13,006   15,518   19,700   27,962 
Total loans $502,799  $463,133  $446,862  $440,461  $451,377 

At December 31, 2017,2020, there were no concentration of loansloan concentrations to commercial borrowers engaged in similar activities that exceeded 10% of total loans.  The largest industry concentration at December 31, 2017 was approximately $16.8 million or 3.3% of loans to the hospitality industry.


Based on regulatory guidelines, the Bank is required to monitor the commercial investment real estate loan portfolio for: (a)(i) concentrations above 100% of Tier 1 capital and loan loss reserve for construction and land loans and (b)and; (ii) concentrations above 300% for permanent investor real estate loans. As of December 31, 2017, construction and land loans are $38.1 million or 59.2% of the concentration limit, while permanent investor real estate loans (by NAICS code) are $129.3 million or 200.9% of the concentration level.

ANALYSIS OF LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level which, in management’s judgment, is adequate to absorb credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loan loss experience, impaired loans, and current economic conditions. Management periodically reviews the loan portfolio to determine probable credit losses related to specifically identified loans as well as credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio. Allowances for impaired loans are generally determined based on net realizable values or the present value of estimated cash flows. The allowance is increased by a provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Changes in the allowances relating to impaired loans are charged or credited to the provision for loan losses. Because of uncertainties inherent in the estimation process, management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio and the related allowance remains subject to change. Additions to the allowance for loan losses, recorded as the provision for (recovery of) loan losses on the Company’s statements of operations, are made as needed to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level based on management’s analysis. The amount of the provision is a function of the level of loans outstanding, the level and nature of impaired and nonperforming loans, historical loan loss experience, the amount of loan losses actually charged-off or recovered during a given period and current national and local economic conditions.

The allowance for loan losses was $5.1 million or 1.01% of total loans at December 31, 2017, compared to $4.5 million or 0.98% of total loans and $4.2 million or 0.94% of total loans at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  The provision for loan losses was  $520,000 and $8.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2015, respectively, and a recovery of loan losses of $508,000 during 2016.  Changes in provision expense for 2017 was primarily due to portfolio growth and changes in historical loss rates, adjustments to qualitative factors based on management's ongoing analysis of economic and environmental factors, partially offset by improvements in asset quality from reductions in classified and nonaccrual loans. The recovery of loan losses during 2016 was the result of a $1.4 million recovery received on loans charged-off in previous years.  Management believes that adequate reserves existed on nonperforming loans as of December 31, 2017.

The increase in the allowance is due, in part, to the increase in impaired loans from $8.5 million at December 31, 2016 to $10.9 at December 31, 2017 and adjustments to reflect management's perception of portfolio risk based on the Company's analysis of external and internal qualitative factors of the loan portfolio.  There were 17 loans totaling $10.9 million at December 31, 2017 that were considered impaired and were allocated $912,000 of loan loss reserves. This included eight loans totaling $7.7 million that were performing and accruing interest at December 31, 2017. Additionally, there were nine loans totaling $3.2 million that were nonaccrual. There are no loans, other than those disclosed above as either non-performing or impaired, where information known about the borrower has caused management to have serious doubts about the borrower’s ability to repay.

The amount of the provision for loan loss for 2017, 2016 and 2015 was based upon management’s continual evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, which encompasses the overall risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, trends in the Bank’s delinquent and nonperforming loans, estimated values of collateral, and the impact of economic conditions on borrowers. The loss history by loan category, prolonged changes in portfolio delinquency trends by loan category, and changes in economic trends are also utilized in determining the allowance. There can be no assurances, however, that future losses will not exceed estimated amounts, or that increased amounts of provisions for loan losses will not be required in future periods.

The following table summarizes the Bank’s loan loss experience for each of the years presented:

  Years ended December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands) 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013 
Allowance for loan losses, January 1, $4,525  $4,193  $5,391  $6,667  $6,258 
Charged-off loans:                    
Secured by real estate:                    
Construction and land        17   313    
1-4 family residential  51   36   167   172   284 
Home equity lines of credit        50   91   174 
Commercial real estate  476   380   568   560   686 
Commercial and industrial  19   226   8,525   171   257 
Student  31   36   50   139    
Consumer  114   46   10   18   104 
Total loans charged-off  691   724   9,387   1,464   1,505 
Recoveries:                    
Secured by real estate:                    
Construction and land           65    
1-4 family residential  6      52   22   2 
Home equity lines of credit  3   3   21   5   11 
Commercial real estate  575   24          
Commercial and industrial  154   1,527   102   86   76 
Student               
Consumer  2   10   14   10   25 
Total loans recoveries  740   1,564   189   188   114 
Net charge-offs (recoveries)  (49)  (840)  9,198   1,276   1,391 
Provision for (recovery of)  loan losses  520   (508)  8,000      1,800 
Allowance for loan losses, December 31, $5,094  $4,525  $4,193  $5,391  $6,667 
                     
Ratio of net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans  (0.01%)  (0.19%)  2.04%  0.29%  0.31%

The following table allocates the allowance for loan losses at December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013 to each loan category. The allowance has been allocated according to the amount deemed to be reasonably necessary to provide for the possibility of losses being incurred, although the entire allowance balance is available to absorb any actual charge-offs that may occur.
  2017  2016  2015 
(Dollars in thousands) 
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
  
Percentage
of Total
Loans
  
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
  
Percentage
of Total
Loans
  
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
  
Percentage
of Total
Loans
 
Secured by real estate:                  
Construction and land $879   10.77% $661   10.75% $924   11.16%
1-4 family residential  1,174   37.21%  943   35.06%  886   33.70%
Home equity lines of credit  387   8.86%  307   9.47%  356   9.85%
Commercial real estate  1,609   35.17%  1,569   35.69%  1,162   35.81%
Commercial and industrial  518   4.86%  561   5.56%  526   5.30%
Student  72   2.11%  76   2.81%  117   3.47%
Consumer  105   1.01%  21   0.67%  13   0.71%
Unallocated  350      387      209    
  $5,094   100.00% $4,525   100.00% $4,193   100.00%

  2014  2013 
  
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
  
Percentage
of Total
Loans
  
Allowance
for Loan
Losses
  
Percentage
of Total
Loans
 
Secured by real estate:            
Construction $699   8.87% $412   7.27%
1-4 family residential  1,424   32.58%  1,261   31.52%
Home equity lines of credit  296   9.70%  1,314   9.63%
Commercial real estate  1,943   37.58%  2,320   39.06%
Commercial and industrial  516   6.11%  964   5.48%
Student  72   4.47%  196   6.20%
Consumer  37   0.69%  18   0.84%
Unallocated  404      182    
  $5,391   100.00% $6,667   100.00%

NONINTEREST INCOME

2017 COMPARED WITH 2016
Total noninterest income increased by $171,000 or 3.2% from $5.30 million in 2016 to $5.47 million in 2017.  The following are the primary components of noninterest income:
Trust and estate income increased $119,000 or 8.4% from 2016 to 2017.
Brokerage income decreased $14,000 or 7.6% from 2016 to 2017.
Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $182,000 or 8.6% to $1.9 million for 2017, compared with $2.1 million for 2016. The reason for the change may be linked to the continued growth in mobile banking usage, combined with improved personal cash flow as economic conditions continue to improve.
ATM fee income, net, totaled $1.3 million and $1.1 million for 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”) income was $362,000 in 2017, relatively unchanged from 2016.
Other service charges, commissions and fees decreased $68,000 or 18.5% from $367,000 in 2016 to $299,000 in 2017.
The recognition of passive losses within community development tax credit investments was $126,000 in 2017 compared with $267,000 in 2016, a $141,000 decrease. These passive losses will be more than offset in future periods by federal tax credits related to low/moderate income housing and/or buildings of historical significance.

2016 COMPARED WITH 2015
Total noninterest income decreased by $1.1 million or 17.5% from $6.4 million in 2015 to $5.3 million in 2016.  The following are the primary components of noninterest income:
Trust and estate income decreased $530,000 or 27.3% from 2015 to 2016, primarily due to the decline in production from the loss of personnel.
Brokerage income decreased $65,000 primarily due to the loss of personnel, as well as a shift from transaction based fees to assets under management.
Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $228,000 or 9.8% to $2.1 million in 2016, compared to $2.3 million in 2015. This decrease is attributable to growth in mobile banking combined with improved personal cash flow as economic conditions continue to improve.
ATM income, net, totaled $1.1 million and $1.2 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively.  This decline is associated with increased expense required for the production and issuance of chip enabled quipped debit cards.
BOLI income decreased from $796,000 in 2015 to $361,000 in 2016. Approximately $433,000 of BOLI income was in tax-free death benefits in excess of surrender value in 2015.
Other service charges, commissions and fees increased $13,000 or 3.7% to $367,000 from $354,000.
The recognition of passive losses within community development tax credit investments decreased $215,000.

NONINTEREST EXPENSE

2017 COMPARED WITH 2016
Total noninterest expense decreased $81,000 or 0.4% in 2017 compared with 2016. The primary components of noninterest expense are:
Salary and benefit expenses increased $323,000, or 3.0% in 2017 compared with 2016, primarily reflecting the increase in salary expense, merit salary increases, incentive pay and production based commissions.  The Company expects personnel costs, consisting primarily of salary and benefits, to continue to be its largest noninterest expense.
Net occupancy expense remained relatively unchanged from 2016 to 2017.  Furniture and equipment decreased $97,000 as a result of improved management of expenses for the period.
Marketing expense decreased $58,000 or 10.9% from 2016 to 2017 reflecting expense reductions to various areas such as advertising, promotional items and business development overhead.
Consulting expense, which includes legal and auditing fees, decreased $140,000 or 11.7% in 2017 compared with 2016.  This decline was primarily related to reduced expenses for troubled loan workouts in 2017 compared with 2016.
Data processing expense remained relatively unchanged from 2016 to 2017.  The Company outsources most of its data processing to third-party vendors.
The FDIC deposit insurance expense decreased $177,000 or 36.2% from $489,000 in 2016 to $312,000 for 2017, primarily due to the recent changes to the assessment calculations.
Other operating expenses increased $71,000 or 2.3% from 2016 to 2017. This was primarily due to operating expenses related to the Company's newly established business line for the origination and sale of mortgage loans on the secondary market.

2016 COMPARED WITH 2015
Total noninterest expense increased $739,000 or 3.7% in 2016 compared to 2015. The primary components of noninterest expense are:
Salary and benefit expenses increased $796,000, or 8.0%, primarily reflecting the increase in salary expense, merit salary increases and incentive pay.
Net occupancy expense increased $2,000 or 0.1%, and furniture and equipment expense increased $14,000 or 1.1%, from 2015 to 2016.
Marketing expense decreased $90,000 or 14.4% from 2015 to 2016 reflecting expense reductions to various areas such as advertising, promotional items and business development overhead.
Legal, audit and consulting expense increased $24,000 or 2.0% in 2016 compared with 2015.  An increase of $179,000 for continued legal expenses for troubled loan workouts in 2016 compared with 2015 was mostly offset by a decrease of $136,000 in consulting expenses during the same time period. The decrease in consulting expense was due to reduced expenses related to the chief executive officer succession planning in 2016 compared to 2015.
Data processing expense decreased $55,000 or 4.2% in 2016 compared with 2015 due to management’s expense reduction initiative.
The FDIC deposit insurance expense increased $103,000 or 26.7% from $386,000 for 2015 to $489,000 for 2016, primarily due to the  carryforward impact of 2015 charge-offs and their weight in FDIC assessment calculations.
Other operating expenses decreased $70,000 or 2.2% from 2015 to 2016. This was primarily due to a $124,000 decrease in non-loan charge-offs, with the largest portion related to debit card fraud. Retail debit/credit data breaches that plagued 2015 were infrequent during 2016, leading to less expense.

INCOME TAXES
The provision for income taxes is based upon the results of operations, adjusted for the effect of certain tax-exempt income and non-deductible expenses. In addition, certain items of income and expense are reported in different periods for financial reporting and tax return purposes. The tax effects of these temporary differences are recognized currently in the deferred income tax provision or benefit. Deferred tax assets or liabilities are computed based on the difference between the financial statement and income tax bases of assets and liabilities using the applicable enacted marginal tax rate.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was signed into law. Among other things, the Tax Act permanently reduced the corporate tax rate to 21% from the prior maximum rate of 35%, effective for tax years including or commencing January 1, 2018. As a result of the reduction of the corporate tax rate to 21%, companies were required to revalue their deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the date of enactment, with resulting tax effects accounted for in the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company continues to evaluate the impact on its 2017 tax expense of the revaluation required by the lower corporate tax rate implemented by the Tax Act, which management has estimated to be approximately $1.7 million. During the fourth quarter of 2017,2020, the Company recorded $1.7 million in additional tax expense based on the Company's preliminary analysis of the impact of the Tax Act. The Company's preliminary estimate of the impact of the Tax Act is based on currently available information and interpretation of its provisions. The actual results may differ from the current estimate due to, among other things, further guidance that may be issued by U.S. tax authorities or regulatory bodies and/or changes in interpretations and assumptions that the Company has preliminarily made. The Company's evaluation of the impact of the Tax Act is subject to refinement for up to one year after enactment per the guidance under ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes, and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.

The income tax expense was $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared with an income tax expense of $937,000 for the year ended December 31, 2016 and an income tax benefit of $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The effective tax rate was 53.6% for 2017, as compared to 20.3% for 2016, and a tax rate benefit of 69.9% for 2015. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2017 compared to prior years was primarily related to the impact of the Tax Act.

COMPARISON OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AT DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND DECEMBER 31, 2016

ASSETS
Total assets were $644.6 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of 3.2% or $20.2 million from $624.4 million at December 31, 2016. Balance sheet categories reflecting significant changes in assets were:
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks decreased from $62.3 million at December 31, 2016 to $23.4 million at December 31, 2017. The decrease in interest-bearing deposits in other banks was primarily the result of lower deposits at the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond due to excess funds being deployed to fund loan and securities growth.
Securities available for sale were $72.2 million at December 31, 2017, reflecting an increase of $22.32 million from $50.0 million at December 31, 2016.  See Note 2 “Securities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the Company’s investment securities.
Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses was $497.7 million at December 31, 2017, which represents an increase of $39.1 million or 8.5% from $458.6 million at December 31, 2016.
Bank premises and equipment, net of depreciation, totaled $18.6 million at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $693,000, primarily due to normal depreciation of assets. No new facilities were added in 2017 and none were in process.
Other assets were $8.8 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $11.2 million for the same period in 2016.  This decline is primarily the result of the deferred tax adjustment related to the Tax Act.

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Total liabilities were $588.5 million at December 31, 2017, an increase of 3.2% or $18.5 million from $570.0 million at December 31, 2016. Balance sheet categories reflecting significant changes in liabilities were:
Deposits increased by $23.9 million or 4.4% when compared with total deposits one year earlier.
FHLB advances at December 31, 2017 were $7.9 million, a decrease of $5.1 million, or 39.2%, when compared to $12.9 million at December 31, 2016.
Other liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2017 totaled $6.5 million, a decrease of $313,000 as compared to other liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to a reduction in commitment liabilities associated with the Company's investment in community development tax credits.

At December 31, 2017, shareholders’ equity was $56.1 million, an increase of $1.7 million from December 31, 2016. The Company’s capital ratios continue to exceed the minimum capital requirements for regulatory purposes.

SECURITIES
At December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the carrying values of securities were:

  
Available for Sale (1)
 
(Dollars in thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $52,377  $40,504  $45,792 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions, taxable  509   516   524 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions, tax-exempt  14,746   5,794   5,676 
Corporate bonds  4,139   2,785   2,860 
Mutual funds  382   374   372 
Total $72,153  $49,973  $55,224 
(1)Amounts for available for sale securities are based on fair value.

The following is a schedule of estimated maturities, or call date if more probable, or next rate repricing adjustment date, and related weighted average yields of securities at December 31, 2017:

  Due in one year or less  
Due after 1
through 5 years
  
Due after 5
through 10 years
 
(Dollars in thousands) Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
Securities available for sale:                  
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $1,974   2.01% $3,294   1.94% $22,479   2.45%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions, taxable         509   2.33%       
Total taxable  1,974   2.01%  3,803   2.00%  22,479   2.45%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions, tax-exempt  375   6.01%  821   2.57%  11,979   3.46%
Total securities $2,349   2.65% $4,624   2.10% $34,458   2.80%

  Due after 10 years  Total 
  Amount  Yield  Amount  Yield 
Securities available for sale:            
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $24,629   2.71% $52,376   2.53%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions, taxable         509   2.33%
Corporate bonds  4,140   5.60%  4,140   5.60%
Mutual funds  382   2.15%  382   2.15%
Total taxable  29,151   3.11%  57,407   2.74%
Obligations of states and political subdivisions, tax-exempt  1,571      14,746   3.48%
Total securities $30,722   3.13% $72,153   2.89%

Excluding obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies, there were no securities from a single issuer exceeding 10% of shareholders’ equity.

LOANS
Loans, net of the allowance for loan losses, was $497.7 million at December 31, 2017, which represents an increase of $39.1 million or 8.5% from $458.6 million at December 31, 2016. Changes in the loan portfolio from December 31, 2016 to 2017 were:
Commercial and industrial loans decreased $1.3 million or 5.1%.
Commercial real estate loans increased $11.6 million or 7.0%.
Construction and land loans increased $4.4 million or 8.8%.
Consumer loans increased $2.0 million or 63.5%.
Student loans decreased $2.3 million or 17.9%.
Residential real estate loans increased $24.7 million or 15.2%.
Home equity lines of credit increased $687,000 or 1.6%.

Loans are made primarily to customers located within the Company’s primary market area. Loan pricing strategies and product offerings are continually modified expanded in an effort to increase lending activity without sacrificing the existing credit quality standards.

well below these thresholds.

The following is a schedule of maturities and sensitivities of loans subject to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2017:2020:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Within One Year

 

 

One Year through Five Years

 

 

After Five Years

 

 

Total

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

8,487

 

 

$

52,498

 

 

$

7,405

 

 

$

68,390

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

27,948

 

 

 

96,382

 

 

 

76,360

 

 

 

200,690

 

Construction and land

 

 

48,192

 

 

 

25,198

 

 

 

576

 

 

 

73,966

 

 

 

$

84,627

 

 

$

174,078

 

 

$

84,341

 

 

$

343,046

 

For maturities over one year:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Floating and adjustable rate loans

 

 

 

 

 

$

14,938

 

 

$

32,271

 

 

$

47,209

 

Fixed rate loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

159,140

 

 

 

52,070

 

 

 

211,210

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

174,078

 

 

$

84,341

 

 

$

258,419

 

(Dollars in thousands) Within 1 Year  1 Year Within 5 Years  After 5 Years  Total 
Commercial real estate loans $24,875  $80,956  $70,996  $176,827 
Commercial and industrial loans  11,287   10,424   2,702   24,413 
Construction and land loans  22,497   22,219   9,446   54,162 
  $58,659  $113,599  $83,144  $255,402 
For maturities over one year:                
Floating and adjustable rate loans     $33,255  $51,171  $84,426 
Fixed rate loans      80,344   31,973   112,317 
      $113,599  $83,144  $196,743 

DEPOSITS

Included in interest-bearing deposits

Deposits totaled $766.1 million and $622.2 million at December 31, 2017 were $17.3 million of brokered deposits, or 3.0% of total deposits. This compares with $15.6 million of brokered deposits at December 31, 2016, or 2.9% of total deposits. Of the $17.3 million in brokered deposits at December 31, 2017, $2.9 million were deposits of Bank customers, exchanged through the CDARS network2020 and $10.0 million were money market deposits through the ICS network. Of the $15.6 million in brokered deposits at December 31, 2016, $1.1 million were deposits of Bank customers, exchanged through the CDARS network and $10.2 million through the ICS network. With these programs, funds are placed into certificate of deposits and money market deposits issued by other banks in the network, in increments usually less than $250,000, to ensure both principal and interest are eligible for complete FDIC coverage. These deposits are exchanged with other member banks on a dollar-for-dollar basis, bringing the full amount of the Bank's customers deposits back to the Bank and making these funds fully available for lending in the Bank's community.


The Bank projects to increase its transaction account and other deposits in 2018 and beyond by offering value-added NOW and demand deposit products, and selective rate premiums on its interest-bearing deposits.

2019, respectively.  

The average daily amounts of deposits and rates paid on deposits is summarized for the periods indicated in the following table:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

 

Rate

 

 

Amount

 

 

Rate

 

 

Amount

 

 

Rate

 

Demand

 

$

159,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

121,910

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

117,422

 

 

 

 

 

Interest-bearing:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NOW

 

 

252,648

 

 

 

0.20

%

 

 

230,081

 

 

 

0.45

%

 

 

231,819

 

 

 

0.39

%

Money market

 

 

105,218

 

 

 

0.40

%

 

 

78,097

 

 

 

0.83

%

 

 

59,400

 

 

 

0.52

%

Savings

 

 

102,862

 

 

 

0.09

%

 

 

87,478

 

 

 

0.32

%

 

 

89,103

 

 

 

0.26

%

Time deposits

 

 

72,095

 

 

 

1.47

%

 

 

86,205

 

 

 

1.90

%

 

 

73,717

 

 

 

1.37

%

Total interest-bearing deposits

 

 

532,823

 

 

 

0.39

%

 

 

481,861

 

 

 

0.75

%

 

 

454,039

 

 

 

0.54

%

Total deposits

 

$

692,491

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

603,771

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

571,461

 

 

 

 

 


  December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
(Dollars in thousands) Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate 
Noninterest-bearing $114,910     $102,403     $96,538    
Interest-bearing:                     
NOW accounts  233,963   0.28%  231,142   0.23%  211,273   0.21%
Money market accounts  53,660   0.21%  54,511   0.21%  52,787   0.21%
Savings accounts  86,806   0.13%  84,660   0.10%  82,626   0.10%
Time deposits  67,716   1.06%  66,027   0.88%  72,056   1.10%
Total interest-bearing  442,145   0.36%  436,340   0.30%  418,742   0.34%
Total deposits $557,055      $538,743      $515,280     

The following is a schedule of maturities of time deposits in amounts of $100,000 or more at December 31, 2017:2020:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Within

Three Months

 

 

Three through Six Months

 

 

Six through Twelve Months

 

 

Over Twelve Months

 

 

Total

 

$100,000 to $250,000

 

$

8,849

 

 

$

7,100

 

 

$

8,379

 

 

$

2,889

 

 

$

27,217

 

Over $250,000

 

 

1,832

 

 

 

4,525

 

 

 

5,190

 

 

 

1,478

 

 

 

13,025

 

Total

 

$

10,681

 

 

$

11,625

 

 

$

13,569

 

 

$

4,367

 

 

$

40,242

 

   December 31, 2017 
(Dollars in thousands)  Within Three Months  Three to Six Months  Six to Twelve Months  One to Four Years  Over Four Years  Total 
$100,000 to $250,000  $3,681  $1,716  $6,537  $10,936  $590  $23,460 
Over $250,000   797   2,257   1,880   10,567   505   16,006 
Total  $4,478  $3,973  $8,417  $21,503  $1,095  $39,466 

BORROWINGS

Amounts and weighted average rates for long andlong-and short-term borrowings as of December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 are as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Amount

 

 

Rate

 

 

Amount

 

 

Rate

 

 

Amount

 

 

Rate

 

FHLB advances

 

$

12,606

 

 

 

2.06

%

 

$

16,695

 

 

 

2.21

%

 

$

23,780

 

 

 

2.66

%

  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
(Dollars in thousands) Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate  Amount  Rate 
FHLB advances $7,860   2.54% $12,936   2.46% $13,007   2.46%

At December 31, 2017,2020, the weighted average life of FHLB advances was approximately 4.6 years.


2.99 years.

In 2019, the Company sought to reduce its cost of interest-bearing liabilities by reducing the balance of its FHLB advances from $23.8 million at December 31, 2018, to $16.7 million at December 31, 2019.  The reduction of FHLB advances included early repayments of $13.0 million on December 31, 2019, resulting in prepayment penalties totaling $268,000.

LIQUIDITY

Liquidity management involves meeting the present and future financial obligations of the Company with the sale or maturity of assets or with the occurrence of additional liabilities. Liquidity needs are met with cash on hand, deposits in other banks, federal funds sold and unencumbered securities classified as available for sale and loans maturing within one year.sale. At December 31, 2017,2020, liquid assets totaled $191.8$193.0 million, or 29.8%,22.26% of total assets and 32.6%24.29% of total liabilities. Securities provide a constant source of liquidity through paydowns and maturities. Also, theThe Company maintains short-term borrowing arrangements, namely federal funds lines of credit, with larger financial institutions as an additional source of liquidity. Theliquidity and the Bank’s membership with the FHLB also provides a source of borrowings with numerous rate and term structures. Management monitors the liquidity position regularly and attempts to maintain a position which utilizes available funds most efficiently. As a result, of the Company’s management of liquid assets and the ability to generate liquidity through liability funding, management believes that the Company maintains overall liquidity sufficient to satisfy its depositors’ requirements and meet its customers’ credit needs.


CAPITAL

Shareholders’ equity totaled $56.1$72.5 million at December 31, 20172020 compared with $54.5$67.1 million at December 31, 2016.2019. The amount of equity reflects management’s desire to increase shareholders’ return on equity while maintaining a strong capital base. During 2017 and 2016, 382 shares and 3,661 shares, of common stock were repurchased, respectively. No shares were repurchased in 2015.


Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes, was $125,000 at December 31, 2017, compared to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes, of $737,000 at December 31, 2016.

During 2006, the Company established a subsidiary trust that issued $4.0 million of capital securities as part of a separate pooled trust preferred security offering with other financial institutions. Under current applicable regulatory guidelines, the capital securities are treated as Tier 1 capital for purposes of the Federal Reserve’s capital guidelines for bank holding companies, as long as the capital securities and all other cumulative preferred securities of the Company together do not exceed 25% of Tier 1 capital. As previously discussed, banking regulations have established minimum capital requirements for financial institutions, including risk-based capital ratios and leverage ratios. As of December 31, 2017, the Bank falls into the “well capitalized” category as defined by the appropriate regulatory authorities.

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can trigger certain mandatory and discretionary actions by regulators that could have a direct material effect on the Company’s financial statements.condition and results of operations.  Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors. Quantitative measures in effect during 2017 established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy required the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios (set forth in the table below) of Total and Tier 1 capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined in the regulations), and of Tier 1 capital to average assets (as defined in the regulations). In addition effective January 1, 2015,to the regulatory risk-based capital, the Company must maintain a newcapital conservation buffer of additional total capital and common equity Tier 1 capital ratioas required by the Basel III Capital Rules.  The phase-in of 4.5%the capital conservation buffer requirement began on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, increasing by the same amount each year until it was established. fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019.  Management believes as of December 31, 2017, that the Bank more than satisfysatisfies all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.


are subject as of December 31, 2020 and 2019.

As of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company qualified as a small bank holding company under SBHC Policy Statement and, as a result, the Company was exempt from the Basel III Capital Rules.  See the discussion under the heading “Government Supervision and Regulation” in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information.

As of December 31, 2020, the Bank is considered “well capitalized” as defined by regulatory authorities.  The following table provides information on the regulatory capital ratios for the Bank at December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016. Management believes that the Bank exceeds all capital adequacy requirements of Basel III, including the full conservation buffer, as of December 31, 2017.2019.

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

Tier 1 Capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common equity

 

$

75,588

 

 

$

70,312

 

Unrealized (gain) loss on securities available for sale, net

 

 

(2,643

)

 

 

(1,294

)

Unrealized benefit obligation for supplemental retirement plans

 

 

(31

)

 

 

(155

)

Total Common equity tier 1 capital

 

 

72,914

 

 

 

68,863

 

Tier 2 Capital:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowable allowance for loan losses

 

 

6,870

 

 

 

5,227

 

Total Capital:

 

$

79,784

 

 

$

74,090

 

Risk-Weighted Assets:

 

$

575,302

 

 

$

547,202

 

Regulatory Capital Ratios:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Leverage Ratio

 

 

8.54

%

 

 

9.40

%

Common Equity Tier 1 Capital Ratio

 

 

12.67

%

 

 

12.58

%

Tier 1 Capital Ratio

 

 

12.67

%

 

 

12.58

%

Total Capital Ratio

 

 

13.87

%

 

 

13.54

%


  December 31, 
(Dollars in thousands) 2017  2016 
Tier 1 capital:      
Shareholders' equity $59,334  $57,390 
Less: Unrealized (loss) on securities available for sale, net  (30)  (763)
Less: Accumulated net gains on hedges and supplemental retirement plans  104   10 
Total Tier 1 capital  59,260   58,143 
Tier 2 capital:        
Allowable allowance for loan losses  5,094   4,525 
Total capital $64,354  $62,668 
Risk-weighted assets $518,562  $475,943 
Leverage ratio  9.17%  9.23%
Risk Based capital ratios:        
Common equity Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets  11.43%  12.22%
Tier 1 to risk-weighted assets  11.43%  12.22%
Total capital to risk-weighted assets  12.41%  13.17%

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following table sets forth information relating to the Company’s contractual obligations and scheduled payment amounts due at various intervals over the next five years and beyond as of December 31, 2017.2020.

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Payments due by period

 

Contractual Obligations:

 

Total

 

 

Less than One Year

 

 

Two through

Three Years

 

 

Four through

Five Years

 

 

More than Five Years (1)

 

Debt obligations

 

$

16,730

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

2,606

 

 

$

10,000

 

 

$

4,124

 

Data processing obligations

 

 

2,494

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

2,494

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Lease obligations

 

 

5,277

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,320

 

 

 

1,353

 

 

 

2,604

 

Total

 

$

24,501

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

6,420

 

 

$

11,353

 

 

$

6,728

 


(Dollars in thousands) Payments due by period 
Contractual Obligations: Total  Less than One Year  2-3 Years  4-5 Years  
More than 5 Years(1)
 
Debt obligations $11,984  $80  $174  $7,606  $4,124 
Operating lease obligations  19,775   2,905   6,099   6,445   4,326 
Total $31,759  $2,985  $6,273  $14,051  $8,450 

(1)

Includes $4.1 million of junior subordinated debt with varying put provisions beginning September 21, 2011 with a mandatory redemption September 21, 2036.2036.


OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company'sCompany’s off-balance sheet arrangements consist of interest rate swap agreements, commitments to extend credit and letters of credit.  SeeRefer to Note 15 “Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk” and Note 16 “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the specific arrangements and elements of credit and interest rate risk inherent to the arrangements.  These arrangements increase the degree of both credit and interest rate risk beyond that which is recognized through the financial assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.


IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING PRICES

The consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes presented elsewhere in this document have been prepared in accordance with GAAP, which require the measurement of financial position and operating results in terms of historical dollars without considering

39


Table of Contents

the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time and due to inflation. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of the Company and the Bank are monetary in nature. The impact of inflation is reflected in the increased cost of operations. As a result, interest rates have a greater impact on the Company'sCompany’s performance than inflation does.inflation. Interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

For information regarding recent

Recent accounting pronouncements and their effect onaffecting the Company see “Recent Accounting Pronouncements”are described in Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” under the heading Note 1 “Nature of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained herein.


NON-GAAP MEASURES
In reporting the results of the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company has provided supplemental performance measures on an operating basis. These measures are a supplement to GAAP used to prepare the Company's financial statementsBanking Activities and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable measures calculated in accordance with GAAP. In addition, the Company's non-GAAP measures may not be comparable to non-GAAP measures of other companies.

Operating measures exclude nonrecurring tax expenses, which tax expenses are unrelated to the Company’s normal operations. The Company believes these measures are useful to investors as they exclude certain costs resulting from the impact of the Tax ActSignificant Accounting Policies-Recent Significant Accounting Pronouncements and allows investors to more clearly see the combined economic results of the Company's operations.

The following table reconciles these non-GAAP measures from their respective GAAP basis measures for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015.

  For the years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016  2015 
Adjusted Net Income (Loss) and Earnings Per Share         
Net income (loss), as reported $2,496  $3,674  $(612)
Net deferred tax asset revaluation adjustment  1,669       
Adjusted net income (loss) $4,165  $  $(612)
             
Weighted average shares, assuming dilution  3,773,010   3,763,929   3,742,725 
Weighted average shares, basic  3,764,690   3,753,757   3,742,725 
             
Earnings (loss) per share, assuming dilution            
Earnings (loss) per share, assuming dilution, as reported $0.66  $0.98  $(0.16)
Adjusted earnings per share, assuming dilution  1.10   0.98   (0.16)
             
Earnings (loss) per share, basic            
Earnings (loss) per share, basic, as reported  0.66   0.98   (0.16)
Adjusted earnings per share, basic  1.11   0.98   (0.16)
             
Adjusted Return (Loss) on Average Equity (ROE)            
Average shareholders' equity  56,221   53,839   55,958 
ROE, as reported  4.44%  6.82%  (1.09%)
Adjusted ROE  7.39%  6.82%  (1.09%)
             
Adjusted Return (Loss) on Average Assets (ROA)            
Average assets $633,807  $616,793  $598,361 
ROA, as reported  0.39%  0.60   (0.10%)
Adjusted ROA  0.66%  0.60   (0.10%)

Other Regulatory Statements.”

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk is the risk of loss in a financial instrument arising from adverse changes in market rates or prices such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices.  The Company’s primary market risk exposure is interest rate risk, though it should be noted that the assets under management by Wealth Management are affected by equity price risk.  The ongoing monitoring and management of this risk is an important component of the Company’s asset/liability management process, which is governed by policies established by its Board of Directors.  The Company has established a management Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) that oversees and develops guidelines and strategies that govern the Company’s asset/liability management activities, based upon estimated market risk sensitivity, policy limits and overall market interest rate levels and trends.

Interest rate risk represents the sensitivity of earnings to changes in market interest rates.  As interest rates change, the interest income and expense streams associated with the Company’s financial instruments also change, affecting net interest income, the primary component of the Company’s earnings.  ALCO uses the results of a detailed and dynamic simulation model to quantify the estimated exposure of net interest income to sustained interest rate changes.  

The simulation model captures the impact of changing interest rates on the interest income received and interest expense paid on all assets and liabilities reflected on the Company’s balance sheets.  The simulation model’s sensitivity analysis is compared to ALCO policy limits, which specify a maximum tolerance level for net interest income exposure over a one-year horizon, assuming no balance sheet growth, given upward and downward shifts in interest rates.  The following reflects the range of the Company’s estimated net interest income sensitivity analysis during 2020 and 2019.

Rate Change

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

- 100 bps

 

 

(3.20

)%

 

 

(5.30

)%

+ 100 bps

 

 

4.40

%

 

 

2.50

%

+ 200 bps

 

 

7.90

%

 

 

4.10

%

Not applicable as

Asset sensitivity indicates that in a rising interest rate environment the Company’s net interest income would increase and in a decreasing interest rate environment the Company’s net interest income would decrease. Liability sensitivity indicates that in a rising interest rate environment the Company’s net interest income would decrease and in a decreasing interest rate environment the Company’s net interest income would increase.  Based on the analysis above, from a net interest income perspective, the Company was asset sensitive at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019.

While these numbers are subjective based upon the parameters used within the model, management believes that the current interest rate exposure is a smaller reporting company under SEC rules.

24
manageable and does not indicate any significant exposure to interest rate changes.

The preceding sensitivity analysis does not represent the Company’s forecast and should not be relied upon as being indicative of expected operating results.  These hypothetical estimates are based upon numerous assumptions, including the nature and timing of interest rate levels including yield curve shape, prepayments on loans and securities, deposit decay rates, pricing decisions on loans and deposits, reinvestment or replacement of asset and liability cash flows.  While assumptions are developed based upon current economic and local market conditions, the Company cannot make any assurances about the predictive nature of these assumptions, including how customer preferences or competitor influences might change.

Also, as market conditions vary from those assumed in the sensitivity analysis, actual results will also differ due to factors such as prepayment and refinancing levels likely deviating from those assumed, the varying impact of interest rate change, caps or floors on adjustable rate assets, the potential effect of changing debt service levels on customers with adjustable rate loans, depositor early

40


withdrawals and product preference changes, and other internal and external variables.  Furthermore, the sensitivity analysis does not reflect actions that ALCO might take in response to or anticipation of changes in interest rates.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


FAUQUIER BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL REPORT

DECEMBER

December 31, 2017


2020


41


Table of Contents

CONTENTS


CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Shareholders

Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.

Warrenton, Virginia


Opinion on the Financial Statements


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statementstatements of operations, comprehensive income, (loss), changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the yearthree years in the period ended December 31, 20172020 and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated“consolidated financial statements)statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the yearthree years in the period ended December 31, 2017.


2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit,audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our auditaudits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.


43


Table of Contents

Allowance for Loan Losses

Description of the Matter

As described in Note 1 (Nature of Banking Activities and Significant Accounting Policies) and Note 3 (Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company maintains an allowance for loan losses that represents management’s estimate of the probable losses inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio. Auditing management’s estimate used in determining the allowance for the loan portfolio involved a high degree of subjectivity in evaluating management’s determination of the factors and assumptions used in the allowance estimate. At December 31, 2020, the allowance for loans losses was $6,870,000.

We identified the determination and application of the various allowance calculation inputs and assumptions as a critical audit matter because of the extent of auditor judgment applied and significant audit effort to evaluate the significant subjective and complex judgments made by management related to these elements.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding and evaluated the design of controls over the Company’s allowance process for the loan portfolio. Controls included, among others, those over the risk rating process, the identification of indicators of impairment, management’s review and approval of the calculations used to determine the allowance, including the underlying data and data inputs and outputs of those calculations, and management’s evaluation and review of the qualitative adjustments, including the reasonable and supportable forecast qualitative adjustment.

To test the Company’s allowance estimate, we tested the underlying data used in the estimate calculation to determine it was accurate, complete and relevant. Included in this were loan reviews to test the accuracy of loan grades and specific reserve calculations, as well as testing the allowance calculation model for computational accuracy. Further, we evaluated management’s basis for qualitative adjustments in relation to changes in economic conditions. Our procedures included evaluating management’s inputs and assumptions by comparing the information to internal and external source data including, among others, historical loss data and economic data utilized by the Company.  In addition, we evaluated the overall allowance amount and whether the amount appropriately reflects losses incurred in the loan portfolios as of the consolidated balance sheet date. We also reviewed subsequent events and transactions and considered whether they corroborate or contradict the Company’s conclusion.



/s/ Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P.

L.L.P

BROWN, EDWARDS & COMPANY, L.L.P.

L.L.P


We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2017.


Harrisonburg, Virginia

March 29, 2018



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Fauquier Bankshares, Inc.
Warrenton, Virginia
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016.  The management of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) is responsible for these consolidated financial statements.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC
SMITH ELLIOTT KEARNS & COMPANY, LLC

Chambersburg, Pennsylvania
March 24, 2017

Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 20172020 and 20162019

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

December 31,

2020

 

 

December 31,

2019

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and due from banks

 

$

15,728

 

 

$

9,124

 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

 

 

108,825

 

 

 

37,203

 

Federal funds sold

 

 

13

 

 

 

14

 

Securities available for sale, at fair value

 

 

82,848

 

 

 

79,783

 

Restricted investments

 

 

1,835

 

 

 

2,016

 

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

 

375

 

 

 

247

 

Loans

 

 

616,749

 

 

 

550,226

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

 

(6,870

)

 

 

(5,227

)

Loans, net

 

 

609,879

 

 

 

544,999

 

Premises and equipment, net

 

 

16,529

 

 

 

17,492

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

 

2,305

 

 

 

1,984

 

Other real estate owned, net

 

 

1,356

 

 

 

1,356

 

Bank-owned life insurance

 

 

14,321

 

 

 

13,961

 

Other assets

 

 

13,159

 

 

 

13,992

 

Total assets

 

$

867,173

 

 

$

722,171

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Noninterest-bearing checking

 

$

182,653

 

 

$

123,492

 

Interest-bearing:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Checking

 

 

266,501

 

 

 

242,531

 

Savings and money market accounts

 

 

243,573

 

 

 

182,007

 

Time deposits

 

 

73,392

 

 

 

74,125

 

Total interest-bearing

 

 

583,466

 

 

 

498,663

 

Total deposits

 

 

766,119

 

 

 

622,155

 

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

 

 

12,606

 

 

 

16,695

 

Junior subordinated debt

 

 

4,124

 

 

 

4,124

 

Other liabilities

 

 

11,863

 

 

 

12,075

 

Total liabilities

 

 

794,712

 

 

 

655,049

 

Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, par value $3.13, and additional paid-in capital; authorized: 8,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding: 3,798,561 and 3,783,724 shares including 8,621 and 20,352 unvested shares, respectively

 

 

16,369

 

 

 

15,964

 

Retained earnings

 

 

53,767

 

 

 

49,787

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net

 

 

2,325

 

 

 

1,371

 

Total shareholders’ equity

 

 

72,461

 

 

 

67,122

 

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

 

$

867,173

 

 

$

722,171

 


(In thousands, except share information) 2017  2016 
Assets      
Cash and due from banks $5,868  $5,509 
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks  23,424   62,327 
Federal funds sold  8   10 
Securities available for sale, at fair value  72,153   49,973 
Restricted investments  1,546   1,782 
Loans  502,799   463,133 
  Allowance for loan losses  (5,094)  (4,525)
Loans, net  497,705   458,608 
Premises and equipment, net  18,606   19,299 
Accrued interest receivable  1,940   1,550 
Other real estate owned, net  1,356   1,356 
Bank-owned life insurance  13,234   12,873 
Other assets  8,773   11,158 
Total assets $644,613  $624,445 
         
Liabilities        
Deposits:        
Noninterest-bearing $115,682  $110,121 
Interest-bearing:        
  Checking  245,564   238,698 
  Savings and money market accounts  136,862   131,008 
  Time deposits  71,915   66,330 
Total interest-bearing  454,341   436,036 
Total deposits  570,023   546,157 
         
Federal Home Loan Bank advances  7,860   12,936 
Junior subordinated debt  4,124   4,124 
Other liabilities  6,464   6,777 
Total liabilities  588,471   569,994 
         
Shareholders' Equity        
Common stock, par value, $3.13, and additional paid-in capital; authorized 8,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 2017: 3,762,677 shares including 18,062 non-vested shares; 2016: 3,753,919 shares including 18,045 non-vested shares  15,526   15,364 
Retained earnings  40,491   39,824 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net  125   (737)
Total shareholders' equity  56,142   54,451 
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $644,613  $624,445 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018

(In thousands, except per share data)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and fees on loans

 

$

26,192

 

 

$

26,398

 

 

$

24,291

 

Interest and dividends on securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Taxable interest income

 

 

1,389

 

 

 

1,465

 

 

 

1,487

 

Tax-exempt interest

 

 

431

 

 

 

359

 

 

 

375

 

Dividends

 

 

165

 

 

 

166

 

 

 

135

 

Interest on deposits in other banks

 

 

135

 

 

 

782

 

 

 

410

 

Total interest income

 

 

28,312

 

 

 

29,170

 

 

 

26,698

 

Interest Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest on deposits

 

 

2,064

 

 

 

3,595

 

 

 

2,447

 

Interest on federal funds purchased

 

 

-

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

46

 

Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances

 

 

291

 

 

 

712

 

 

 

541

 

Interest on Junior subordinated debt

 

 

186

 

 

 

199

 

 

 

199

 

Total interest expense

 

 

2,541

 

 

 

4,520

 

 

 

3,233

 

Net interest income

 

 

25,771

 

 

 

24,650

 

 

 

23,465

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

1,773

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

507

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

 

 

23,998

 

 

 

24,304

 

 

 

22,958

 

Noninterest Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trust and estate fees

 

 

2,249

 

 

 

1,743

 

 

 

1,542

 

Brokerage fees

 

 

557

 

 

 

453

 

 

 

180

 

Service charges on deposit accounts

 

 

1,118

 

 

 

1,522

 

 

 

1,706

 

Interchange fee income, net

 

 

1,215

 

 

 

1,305

 

 

 

1,252

 

Bank-owned life insurance

 

 

360

 

 

 

366

 

 

 

361

 

Gain on sale/call of securities available for sale, net

 

 

992

 

 

 

79

 

 

 

838

 

Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale, net

 

 

86

 

 

 

69

 

 

 

37

 

Other income

 

 

(111

)

 

 

437

 

 

 

158

 

Total noninterest income

 

 

6,466

 

 

 

5,974

 

 

 

6,074

 

Noninterest Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Salaries and benefits

 

 

12,103

 

 

 

12,084

 

 

 

12,108

 

Occupancy

 

 

2,409

 

 

 

2,352

 

 

 

2,331

 

Furniture and equipment

 

 

776

 

 

 

1,050

 

 

 

1,012

 

Marketing and business development

 

 

487

 

 

 

648

 

 

 

610

 

Legal, audit and consulting

 

 

1,129

 

 

 

1,054

 

 

 

1,015

 

Data processing

 

 

1,432

 

 

 

1,381

 

 

 

1,292

 

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assessment

 

 

388

 

 

 

190

 

 

 

369

 

Merger related expenses

 

 

1,231

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Prepayment penalty on early debt extinguishment

 

 

-

 

 

 

268

 

 

 

-

 

Other operating expenses

 

 

3,565

 

 

 

3,427

 

 

 

3,414

 

Total noninterest expenses

 

 

23,520

 

 

 

22,454

 

 

 

22,151

 

Income before income taxes

 

 

6,944

 

 

 

7,824

 

 

 

6,881

 

Income tax expense

 

 

1,067

 

 

 

1,004

 

 

 

746

 

Net Income

 

$

5,877

 

 

$

6,820

 

 

$

6,135

 

Earnings per share, basic

 

$

1.55

 

 

$

1.80

 

 

$

1.63

 

Earnings per share, diluted

 

$

1.55

 

 

$

1.80

 

 

$

1.62

 

Dividends per share

 

$

0.50

 

 

$

0.485

 

 

$

0.48

 


(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Interest Income         
Interest and fees on loans $21,147  $19,949  $20,106 
Interest and dividends on securities available for sale:            
Taxable interest income  1,197   958   1,119 
Tax-exempt interest  341   211   219 
Dividends  106   118   111 
Interest on deposits in other banks  529   338   139 
Total interest income  23,320   21,574   21,694 
             
Interest Expense            
Interest on deposits  1,599   1,319   1,430 
Interest on federal funds purchased  2      8 
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank advances  249   324   325 
Junior subordinated debt  199   200   199 
Total interest expense  2,049   1,843   1,962 
             
Net interest income  21,271   19,731   19,732 
             
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses  520   (508)  8,000 
             
Net interest income after provision for (recovery of) loan losses  20,751   20,239   11,732 
             
Noninterest Income            
Trust and estate  1,528   1,409   1,939 
Brokerage fees  170   184   249 
Service charges on deposit accounts  1,926   2,108   2,336 
ATM fee income, net  1,299   1,134   1,222 
Bank-owned life insurance  362   361   796 
Other service charges, commissions and other income  299   367   354 
Loss on housing funds  (126)  (267)  (482)
Gain on sale of mortgage loans held for sale, net  10       
Gain on sale and call of securities     1   4 
Total noninterest income  5,468   5,297   6,418 
             
Noninterest Expenses            
Salaries and benefits  11,083   10,760   9,964 
Occupancy  2,320   2,312   2,314 
Furniture and equipment  1,154   1,251   1,237 
Marketing  476   534   624 
Legal, audit and consulting  1,058   1,198   1,174 
Data processing  1,254   1,264   1,319 
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation  312   489   386 
Other real estate owned  18   19    
Other operating expenses  3,169   3,098   3,168 
Total noninterest expenses  20,844   20,925   20,186 
Income (loss) before income taxes  5,375   4,611   (2,036)
Income tax expense (benefit)  2,879   937   (1,424)
Net Income (Loss) $2,496  $3,674  $(612)
             
Earnings (Loss) per Share, basic
 $0.66  $0.98  $$(0.16)
Earnings (Loss) per Share, assuming dilution
 $0.66  $0.98  $$(0.16)
Dividends per Share $0.48  $0.48  $0.48 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net income

 

$

5,877

 

 

$

6,820

 

 

$

6,135

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in fair value of securities available for sale, net of tax,

$(567), $(586), and $43, respectively

 

 

2,133

 

 

 

2,204

 

 

 

(161

)

Reclassification adjustment for gain on securities available for sale, net of tax,

$208, $17, and $176, respectively

 

 

(784

)

 

 

(62

)

 

 

(662

)

Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net of tax, $72, $66, and $(36), respectively

 

 

(271

)

 

 

(250

)

 

 

135

 

Change in unrecognized benefit obligation for Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,

net of tax, $33, $(4) and $(4), respectively

 

 

(124

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

15

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, $(254), $(507), and $179, respectively

 

 

954

 

 

 

1,909

 

 

 

(673

)

Total comprehensive income

 

$

6,831

 

 

$

8,729

 

 

$

5,462

 


(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Net Income (Loss) $2,496  $3,674  $(612)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:            
Change in fair value of interest rate swap, net of tax of $(1), $(107) and $(5), respectively  14   207   10 
Change in fair value of securities available for sale, net of tax of $(384), $277 and $199, respectively  735   (536)  (386)
Reclassification adjustment for gain on sale of securities available for sale, net of tax of $0, $0 and $1, respectively        (3)
Change in unrecognized benefit obligation for SERP plan, net of tax of $(27), $(26) and $(10), respectively  92   52   20 
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax of $(412), $144 and $185, respectively  841   (277)  (359)
Comprehensive Income (Loss) $3,337  $3,397  $(971)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders'Shareholders’ Equity

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

Common Stock

and Additional Paid-In Capital

 

 

Retained Earnings

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Total

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

$

15,526

 

 

$

40,491

 

 

$

125

 

 

$

56,142

 

Net income

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,135

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,135

 

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect of $179

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(673

)

 

 

(673

)

Cash dividends ($0.48 per share)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(1,813

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(1,813

)

Amortization of unearned compensation, restricted stock awards

 

 

134

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

134

 

Reclassification of net unrealized gains on equity securities from

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

10

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance of common stock - unvested shares (7,333 shares)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance of common stock - vested shares (4,194 shares)

 

 

90

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

90

 

Repurchase of common stock (368 shares)

 

 

(8

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(8

)

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

$

15,742

 

 

$

44,803

 

 

$

(538

)

 

$

60,007

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

$

15,742

 

 

$

44,803

 

 

$

(538

)

 

$

60,007

 

Net income

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,820

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,820

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect of $(507)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,909

 

 

 

1,909

 

Cash dividends ($0.485 per share)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(1,836

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(1,836

)

Amortization of unearned compensation, restricted stock awards

 

 

153

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

153

 

Issuance of common stock - unvested shares (7,956 shares)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance of common stock - vested shares (4,149 shares)

 

 

90

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

90

 

Forfeiture of common stock - unvested shares (1,210 shares)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Repurchase of common stock (960 shares)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(21

)

Balance, December 31, 2019

 

$

15,964

 

 

$

49,787

 

 

$

1,371

 

 

$

67,122

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2019

 

$

15,964

 

 

$

49,787

 

 

$

1,371

 

 

$

67,122

 

Net income

 

 

0

 

 

 

5,877

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

5,877

 

Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $(254)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

954

 

 

 

954

 

Cash dividends ($0.50 per share)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(1,897

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(1,897

)

Amortization of unearned compensation, restricted stock awards

 

 

254

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

254

 

Issuance of common stock - unvested shares (7,889 shares)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Issuance of common stock - vested shares (4,293 shares)

 

 

90

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

90

 

Issuance of common stock - performance-based restricted stock units (4,662 shares)

 

 

85

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

85

 

Repurchase of common stock - unvested shares (2,007 shares)

 

 

(24

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(24

)

Balance, December 31, 2020

 

$

16,369

 

 

$

53,767

 

 

$

2,325

 

 

$

72,461

 

(In thousands) 
Common
Stock and Additional Paid-In Capital
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2014 $14,895  $40,363  $(101) $55,157 
Net (loss)     (612)     (612)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect of $185        (359)  (359)
Cash dividends ($0.48 per share)     (1,798)     (1,798)
Amortization of unearned compensation, restricted stock awards  163         163 
Issuance of common stock - non-vested shares (11,925 shares)            
Issuance of common stock - vested shares (3,458 shares)  60         60 
Tax effect of restricted stock awards  22         22 
Balance, December 31, 2015 $15,140  $37,953  $(460) $52,633 
                 
Balance, December 31, 2015 $15,140  $37,953  $(460) $52,633 
Net income     3,674      3,674 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax effect of $144        (277)  (277)
Cash dividends ($0.48 per share)     (1,803)     (1,803)
Amortization of unearned compensation, restricted stock awards  169         169 
Issuance of common stock - non-vested shares (23,704 shares)            
Issuance of common stock - vested shares (4,536 shares)  68         68 
Repurchase of common stock (3,661 shares)  (55)  -      (55)
Tax effect of restricted stock awards  42         42 
Balance, December 31, 2016 $15,364  $39,824  $(737) $54,451 
                 
Balance, December 31, 2016 $15,364  $39,824  $(737) $54,451 
Net income     2,496      2,496 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax effect of $(412)        841   841 
Cash dividends ($0.48 per share)     (1,808)     (1,808)
Amortization of unearned compensation, restricted stock awards  79         79 
Issuance of common stock - non-vested shares (3,984 shares)            
Issuance of common stock - vested shares (5,139 shares)  90         90 
Repurchase of common stock (382 shares)  (7)        (7)
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act - reclassification adjustment     (21)  21    
Balance, December 31, 2017 $15,526  $40,491  $125  $56,142 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

5,877

 

 

$

6,820

 

 

$

6,135

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

1,086

 

 

 

1,256

 

 

 

1,255

 

Provision for loan losses

 

 

1,773

 

 

 

346

 

 

 

507

 

Loss on disposal of premises and equipment, net

 

 

211

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

(Gain) loss on interest rate swaps, net

 

 

(5

)

 

 

4

 

 

 

3

 

Deferred tax (benefit) expense

 

 

(487

)

 

 

124

 

 

 

221

 

Gains on sales/calls of securities available for sale

 

 

(992

)

 

 

(79

)

 

 

(838

)

Amortization of security premiums, net

 

 

508

 

 

 

450

 

 

 

357

 

Amortization of unearned compensation, net of forfeiture

 

 

328

 

 

 

250

 

 

 

214

 

Issuance of vested restricted stock

 

 

175

 

 

 

90

 

 

 

90

 

Bank-owned life insurance income

 

 

(360

)

 

 

(366

)

 

 

(361

)

Originations of mortgage loans held for sale

 

 

(4,898

)

 

 

(5,379

)

 

 

(2,042

)

Proceeds from mortgage loans held for sale

 

 

4,856

 

 

 

5,201

 

 

 

2,079

 

Gain on mortgage loans held for sale

 

 

(86

)

 

 

(69

)

 

 

(37

)

Changes in assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) decrease in other assets

 

 

745

 

 

 

(4,731

)

 

 

(1,065

)

Increase (decrease) in other liabilities

 

 

(822

)

 

 

4,641

 

 

 

812

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

7,909

 

 

 

8,558

 

 

 

7,330

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal payments of securities available for sale

 

 

16,166

 

 

 

8,196

 

 

 

11,707

 

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale

 

 

18,762

 

 

 

13,871

 

 

 

-

 

Purchase of securities available for sale

 

 

(35,801

)

 

 

(27,626

)

 

 

(12,372

)

Purchase of premises and equipment

 

 

(334

)

 

 

(558

)

 

 

(839

)

(Purchase) redemption of restricted investments, net

 

 

181

 

 

 

224

 

 

 

(694

)

Loan originations, net

 

 

(66,612

)

 

 

(1,009

)

 

 

(47,036

)

Net cash used in investing activities

 

 

(67,638

)

 

 

(6,902

)

 

 

(49,234

)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in noninterest-bearing checking, interest-bearing checking, savings and money market accounts

 

 

144,697

 

 

 

(5,396

)

 

 

55,318

 

Increase (decrease) in time deposits

 

 

(733

)

 

 

(8,087

)

 

 

10,297

 

Increase (decrease) in Federal Home Loan Bank advances

 

 

(4,089

)

 

 

(7,085

)

 

 

15,920

 

Cash dividends paid on common stock

 

 

(1,897

)

 

 

(1,836

)

 

 

(1,813

)

Repurchase of common stock

 

 

(24

)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(8

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

 

137,954

 

 

 

(22,425

)

 

 

79,714

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

78,225

 

 

 

(20,769

)

 

 

37,810

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning

 

 

46,341

 

 

 

67,110

 

 

 

29,300

 

Ending

 

$

124,566

 

 

$

46,341

 

 

$

67,110

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash payments for:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest

 

$

2,651

 

 

$

4,603

 

 

$

3,061

 

Income taxes

 

$

1,255

 

 

$

970

 

 

$

330

 

Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax

 

$

1,349

 

 

$

2,142

 

 

$

(823

)

Unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net of tax

 

$

(271

)

 

$

(250

)

 

$

135

 

Changes in Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans, net of tax

 

$

(124

)

 

$

17

 

 

$

15

 

(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities         
Net income (loss) $2,496  $3,674  $(612)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:            
Depreciation and amortization  1,337   1,450   1,421 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets        32 
Provision for (recovery of) loan losses  520   (508)  8,000 
Gain on sale or impairment of other real estate owned        (31)
Gain on interest rate swaps  (12)  (24)  (44)
Deferred tax expense (benefit)  1,356   229   (1,192)
Gain on sale and call of securities     (1)  (4)
Origination of mortgage loans held for sale  (440)      
Proceeds from mortgage loans held for sale  450       
Gain on mortgage loans held for sale  (10)      
Issuance of vested restricted stock  90   68   60 
Tax effect of restricted stock awards     42   22 
Amortization of security premiums, net  215   72   46 
Amortization of unearned compensation, net of forfeiture  126   207   28 
Bank-owned life insurance income  (362)  (361)  (796)
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Increase in other assets  189   2,131   636 
Decrease in other liabilities  (122)  (405)  (925)
Net cash provided by operating activities  5,833   6,574   6,641 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities            
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal payments of securities available for sale  12,934   14,222   13,349 
Purchase of securities available for sale  (34,215)  (9,854)  (11,798)
Purchase of premises and equipment  (644)  (289)  (845)
(Issuance) redemptions of restricted securities, net  236   (496)  8 
Loan originations, net  (39,665)  (15,460)  (16,157)
Proceeds from sale of other real estate owned        614 
Net cash used in investing activities  (61,354)  (11,877)  (14,829)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities            
Increase in demand deposits, NOW accounts and savings accounts  18,281   19,485   23,286 
Increase (decrease) in time deposits  5,585   2,378   (24,207)
Decrease in Federal Home Loan Bank advances  (5,076)  (71)  (68)
Cash dividends paid on common stock  (1,808)  (1,803)  (1,984)
Repurchase of common stock  (7)  (55)   
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  16,975   19,934   (2,973)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (38,546)  14,631   (11,161)
Cash and Cash Equivalents            
Beginning  67,846   53,215   64,376 
Ending $29,300  $67,846  $53,215 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information            
Cash payments for:            
Interest $2,033  $1,839  $2,040 
Income taxes $600  $  $266 
Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Investing Activities            
Loans transferred to other real estate owned $  $  $533 
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities available for sale, net of tax effect $735  $(536) $(389)
Unrealized gain on interest rate swap, net of tax effect $14  $207  $10 
Changes in benefit obligations and plan assets for defined benefit and post-retirement benefit plans, net of tax effect $92  $52  $20 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.


FAUQUIER BANKSHARES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015

2018


Note 1.

Nature of Banking Activities and Significant Accounting Policies


Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. (the “Company”) is thea bank holding company incorporated under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.  The Company owns all of the stock of The Fauquier Bank (the “Bank”) and, which is an independent commercial bank chartered under the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia.  In addition, the Company owns Fauquier Statutory Trust II (“Trust II”)., which is an unconsolidated subsidiary.  The subordinated debt owed to Trust II is reported as a liability of the Company.  The Bank provides a full range of financial services, including internet banking, mobile banking, commercial, retail, insurance, wealth management, and financial agricultural, residentialplanning services through 11 banking offices throughout Fauquier and consumer loans to customers primarilyPrince William counties in Virginia.  The loan portfolio is well diversified and generally is collateralized by assets of the customers. The loans are expected to be repaid from cash flows or proceeds from the sale of selected assets of the borrowers. The purpose of the September 2006 Trust II issuance was to use the proceeds to redeem the existing capital security Trust I issued on March 26, 2002.


The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and to the reporting guidelines prescribed by regulatory authorities. The following is a description of the more significant of those policies and practices.


Business Combination  

On October 1, 2020, the Company and Virginia National Bankshares Corporation (“Virginia National”) announced a definitive agreement to combine in a strategic merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company will merge with and into Virginia National (the “Merger”). As a result of the Merger, the holders of shares of the Company's common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.675 shares of Virginia National common stock for each share of the Company's common stock held immediately prior to the effective date of the Merger, plus cash in lieu of fractional shares. The transaction is expected to be completed in the second quarter of 2021, subject to approval of both companies' shareholders, regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary, the Bank; and the Bank's wholly-owned subsidiaries, Fauquier Bank Services, Inc. and Specialty Properties Acquisitions - VA, LLC (formed withfor the sole purpose of holding foreclosed property).  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.


Basis of Presentation

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP clarifiesrequires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the rules for consolidationreported amounts of certain entitiesassets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in which voting rights are not effective in identifying the investor with the controlling financial interest. An entity is subject to deconsolidation under the guidance if the investors do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, are unable to direct the entity’s activities, or are not exposednear term relate to the entity’sdetermination of the allowance for loan losses, or entitledthe valuation of other real estate owned, the valuation of deferred taxes and fair value measurements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations in these financial statements, have been made.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to its residual returns (“variable interest entities”). Variable interest entities withinprior period balances to conform to the scopecurrent year presentation.  None of GAAPthe reclassifications were material and none had an impact on net income.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one day periods.  The Company is required to be consolidated with their primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary of a variablemaintain collateral against all loss positions in its interest entity is determined to be the party that absorbs a majority of the entity’s losses, receives a majority of its expected returns, or both.  Management has determined that the Trust II qualifies as a variable interest entity. Trust II issued mandatorily redeemable capital securities to investors and loaned the proceeds to the Company. Trust II held, as its sole asset, subordinated debentures issued by the Companyrate swaps which are described in 2006. The deconsolidation resultedNote 16.

Securities

Investments in the Company’s investment in the common securities of Trust II being included in other assets and a corresponding increase in outstanding debt of $124,000.


Securities
Debt securities that management has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as “held to maturity” and recorded at amortized cost. The Company has no securities in this category. Securities not classified as held to maturity, including equity securities with readily determinable fair values are classified as “availableeither held to maturity, available for sale” and recordedsale, or trading, based on management’s intent. Currently, all of the Company’s investment securities are classified as available for sale. Available for sale securities are carried at estimated fair value with the corresponding unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income (loss).

income. Gains or losses are recognized in earnings on the trade date using the amortized cost of the specific security sold. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income using the interestspecific identification method over the terms of the securities. Declines in

50


Table of Contents

Impairment of securities occurs when the fair value of held to maturity and available for salea security is less than its amortized cost. For debt securities, below their cost that are deemed to be other-than-temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”), management considers (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and (3) whether is recognized in its entirety in net income if either (i) the Company intends to sell the security whetheror (ii) it is more likely than notmore-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, and whetherbasis. If, however, the Company expectsdoes not intend to recoversell the security’s entiresecurity and it is not more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery, the Company must determine what portion of the impairment is attributable to a credit loss, which occurs when the amortized cost basis. Gainsbasis of the security exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security. If there is no credit loss, there is no other-than-temporary impairment. If there is a credit loss, other-than-temporary impairment exists, and lossesthe credit loss must be recognized in net income and the remaining portion of impairment must be recognized in other comprehensive income.  The Company regularly reviews each investment security for other-than-temporary impairment based on criteria that include the saleextent to which cost exceeds market price, the duration of that market decline, the financial health of and specific prospects for the issuer, the Company’s best estimate of the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from debt securities, are recorded on the trade dateCompany’s intention with regard to holding the security to maturity and are determined using the specific identification method.


likelihood that the Company would be required to sell the security before recovery.

Restricted Investments

The Bank is required to maintain an investmentinvestments in the capital stock of certain correspondent banks. No readily available market exists for this stockthese investments and it hasthey have no quoted market value. These investments are recorded at cost and they are reported on the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as restricted investments.


Loans

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale

Mortgage loans held for sale are presented oncarried at the consolidated balance sheets at their recorded investment, which represents the unpaid principal balances, less the allowancelower of aggregate cost or fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held for loan losses, partial charge-offs and the net of unamortized deferred loan fees and costs.


sale is determined using current secondary market prices for loans with similar characteristics.  

Loans

The Company grantsmakes mortgage, commercial and consumer loans to customers. A substantial portion of the loan portfolio is represented by commercial and residential mortgage loans. The ability of the Company’s debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the real estate and general economic conditionsrecorded investment in the Company’s market area. The Company does not have significant concentrations in any one industry or customer.


Loansloans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or pay-off generally areis reported at their outstandingthe unpaid principal balances adjusted for the allowance for loan losses andcharges-offs, unearned discounts, any deferred fees or costs on originated loans.loans, and the allowance for loan losses. Interest incomeon loans is accruedcredited to operations based on the unpaid principal balance.amount outstanding. Loan origination fees net of certain directand origination costs are deferred and recognizedthe net amount is amortized as an adjustment of the related loanloan’s yield using the interest method.

The accrualCompany amortizes these amounts over the contractual life of interest on mortgage, commercial and installment loans is discontinued at the time therelated loans.

The past due status of a loan is 90 daysbased on the contractual due date of the most delinquent unless the credit is well-secured and in the process of collection.payment due.  Loans are typically charged-off no later than 180 days past due. In all cases, loans aregenerally placed on nonaccrual and charged-off sooner ifstatus when the collection of principal or interest is considered uncollectable.


90 days or more past due, or earlier, if collection is uncertain based on an evaluation of the net realizable value of the collateral and the financial strength of the borrower. All interest accrued but not collected for loans that are placed on nonaccrual or charged-off is reversed against interest income. The interest on these loans is accounted for on the cost recovery method, until qualifying for return to accrual.  Loans greater than 90 days past due may remain on accrual status if management determines it has adequate collateral to cover the principal and interest. For those loans that are carried on nonaccrual status, payments are first applied to the principal outstanding.  A loan may be returned to accrual status when allif the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured.

Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is adjusted through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Loan losses are charged againstrepayment performance in accordance with the allowance when management believes the uncollectability of loan principal is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated on a regular basis by management and is based upon management’s periodic review of the collectability of the loans in light of historical experience, the nature and volumecontractual terms of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affectand there is reasonable assurance the borrower’s abilityborrower will continue to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjectivemake payments as it requires estimates thatagreed.  These policies are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

All loans are risk rated on a 1-9 grading system:
Level 1 through 5 are loans with minimal to marginally acceptable risk (Pass)
Level 6 are loans with potential weaknesses identified (Special mention)
Level 7 are loans with well-defined weaknesses that may result in possible losses (Substandard)
Level 8 are loans that are unlikely to be repaid in full and will probably result in losses (Doubtful)
Level 9 are loans that will not be repaid in full and losses will occur (Loss)

The allowance consists of specific and general components as defined by GAAP. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired. For such loans, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or collateral value or observable market price) of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers nonimpaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors and is also maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. This includes an unallocated portion of the allowance which reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating general losses in the portfolio. Individual portfolio segments are evaluated on a rolling quarterly basis for the most recent 12 quarters through a rating matrix of internal and external qualitative factors by the following categories: delinquency, loss history, and nonperforming loans.

The Company has identified the following as loan segments and classes: commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, construction and land, residential real estate, home equity lines of credit, student and consumer.  Risk characteristics are evaluated for each portfolio segment by reviewing external factors such as: unemployment, new building permits, bankruptcies, foreclosures, regional economic conditions, competition and regulatory factors. Internal risk characteristics evaluated include: lender turnover, lender experience, lending policy changes, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral, risk rating adjustments, loan concentrations, and loan review analysis.

Loans secured by commercial real estate are subject to a cyclical industry that has economic and collateral value fluctuations. Commercial real estate lending is primarily limited to the Company's specific geographic market area of Fauquier and Prince William counties. Commercial and industrial loans are made to small businesses in the Company's geographic market area that are subject to management, industry and economic fluctuations that can impact cash flow, which is the primary source of repayment. Collateral for these loans is real estate and/or business assets, such as equipment and inventories. This collateral can fluctuate in value based on market conditions and timing of sale. Retail loans, which include residential mortgages, home equity lines of credit, and consumer loans, are made within strict loan policies, procedures, and regulatory compliance guidelines. Retail loans, when compared to commercial and industrial loans and commercial real estate loans, are of relatively smaller amounts made to many diverse customers within the Bank’s specific market area. There is not a dominant industry within the Bank’s defined market area, but due to the Bank’s proximity to Washington, D.C., a significant amount of local employment is directly or indirectly related to the federal government.  All loans within each segment are subject to review by independent third-party consultants for compliance.

Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, and consumer loans, are collectively evaluated for impairment unlessapplied consistently across the loan is a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).

Commercial and industrial loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans and residential real estate loansportfolio.

Loans are considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, payment history, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for these loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.


Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.

A loan is considered a TDRtrouble debt restructuring (“TDR”) when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and, if so, whether the Bankconcession has been granted a concession to a borrower by modifyingexperiencing financial difficulty.  TDRs are identified at the loan.  Allpoint when the borrower enters into a modification agreement.  TDRs are considered impaired loans and are individually evaluated for impairment.impairment in the determination of the allowance for loan losses.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is established through charges to earnings in the form of a provision for loan losses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when management believes the collectability of loan principal is unlikely. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance.

51


Table of Contents

The allowance represents an amount that, in management’s judgment, will be adequate to absorb probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management’s judgment in determining the level of the allowance is based on evaluations of the collectability of loans while taking into consideration such factors as historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.

All loans are risk rated on a 1-9 grading system:

Level 1 through 5 are loans with minimal to marginally acceptable risk (Pass)


Level 6 are loans with potential weaknesses identified (Special mention)

Level 7 are loans with well-defined weaknesses that may result in possible losses (Substandard)

Level 8 are loans that are unlikely to be repaid in full and will probably result in losses (Doubtful)

Level 9 are loans that will not be repaid in full and losses will occur (Loss)

The allowance consists of specific and general components. The specific component relates to loans that are classified as impaired, and is established when the discounted cash flows, collateral value, or the observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general component covers nonimpaired loans and is based on historical loss experience adjusted for qualitative factors and is also maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. This includes an unallocated portion of the allowance which reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating general losses in the portfolio.

The Company has identified the following loan segments and risk characteristics in evaluating the allowance for loan losses:

Commercial and industrial Commercial and industrial loans are made to small businesses and carry risks associated with management, industry and economic fluctuations that can impact cash flow, which is the primary source of repayment. Collateral for these loans is primarily business assets. This collateral can fluctuate in value based on market conditions and timing of sale.

Commercial real estate – Loans secured by commercial real estate carry risks associated with a cyclical industry that has economic and collateral value fluctuations. Commercial real estate lending is primarily limited to the Company's specific geographic market area of Fauquier and Prince William counties.

Construction and land – Real estate construction loans carry risks that the project will not be finished according to schedule, the project will not be finished according to budget and the value of the collateral may, at any point in time, be less than the principal amount of the loan.

Consumer – Consumer loans carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and the value of the collateral (e.g., rapidly depreciating assets such as automobiles), or lack thereof.

Student - Student loans carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower. Student loans are more likely to be immediately adversely affected by job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy.

Residential real estate – Residential real estate loans carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and changes in the value of the collateral.

Home equity lines of credit – Home equity lines of credit carry risks associated with the continued credit-worthiness of the borrower and changes in the value of the collateral.

Risk characteristics are evaluated for each portfolio segment by reviewing external factors such as: unemployment, new building permits, bankruptcies, foreclosures, economic conditions, competition and the regulatory environment. Internal risk characteristics evaluated include: lender turnover, lender experience, lending policy changes, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral, risk rating adjustments, loan concentrations, and loan review analysis.

Premises and Equipment

Land is carried at cost. Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Premises and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 39 years; leasehold improvements are amortized over the lives of the respective leases or the estimated useful life of the leasehold improvement, whichever is less. Software is amortized over its estimated useful life ranging from 3 to 5 years. Depreciation and amortization are recorded on the straight-line method.


Costs of maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Costs

52


Table of replacing structural partsContents

Leases

The Company recognizes a lease liability and a right-of-use asset in connection with leases in which it is a lessee, except for leases with a term of major unitstwelve months or less.  A lease liability represents the Company obligation to make future payments under lease contracts, and a right-of-use asset represents the Company right to control the use of the underlying property during the lease term.  Lease liabilities and right-of-use assets are considered individuallyrecognized upon commencement of a lease and are expensed or capitalizedmeasured as the facts dictate.


Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held for sale are carriedpresent value of lease payments over the lease term, discounted at the lower of aggregate cost or fair value. The fair value of mortgage loans held for sale is determined using current secondary market prices for loans with similar coupons, maturities, and credit quality and fair value of loans committed at year-end.

Income Taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the balance sheet method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effectsincremental borrowing rate of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.

The Company's federal and state income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service and state tax authorities, generally for a period of three years after the returns are filed.

Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statements of operations.lessee.  The Company has no uncertain tax positions.

On December 22, 2017,elected not to separate lease and nonlease components within the Tax Cutssame contract and Jobs Act (“Tax Act) was signed into law. Referinstead to Note 10 “Income Taxes” for additional information on the impact of the Tax Act.

Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share represent income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to restricted stock and are determined using the treasury method.

Stock Compensation Plans
Compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions is measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Compensation cost for all stock awards is calculated and recognized over the employees' service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded-vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periodaccount for the entire award. A Black-Scholes model is used to estimate the fair value of stock options, while the price of the Company’s common stock at the date of the grant is used for restricted awards. There were no options granted in 2017, 2016 or 2015.

Wealth Management Services Division
Securities and other property held by the Wealth Management Services division incontract as a fiduciary or agency capacity are not assets of the Company and are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, amounts due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in other banks and federal funds sold. Generally, federal funds are purchased and sold for one day periods.

lease.

Other Real Estate Owned ((“OREO”)

Assets acquired through, or in lieu of, loan foreclosure are held for sale and are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell at the date of foreclosure. Subsequent to foreclosure, management periodically performs valuations of the foreclosed assets based on updated appraisals, general market conditions, recent sales of like properties, length of time the properties have been held, and the Company's ability and intention with regard to continued ownership of the properties. The Company may incur additional write-downs of foreclosed assets to fair value less costs to sell if valuations indicate a further deterioration in market conditions. Revenue and expenses from operations and changes in the property valuations are included in net expenses from foreclosed assets and improvements are capitalized.


Use of Estimates
In preparing consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the balance sheets and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, OREO valuation, deferred taxes and fair value measurements.

Marketing
The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of marketing, including advertising, to expense as incurred.

Fair Value Measurements
Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant information and assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 18. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect those estimates.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Under GAAP, comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity from transactions and other events from non-owner sources. It includes all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by and distributions to shareholders. Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and certain elements of other comprehensive income (loss) such as employers’ accounting for pensions, certain investments in debt and equity securities, and interest rate swaps.

Transfers of Financial Assets

Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the asset has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1)(i) the assets have been isolated from the Company, and are presumptively beyond the reach of the transferor and its creditors, even in bankruptcy or other receivership, (2)(ii) the transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3)(iii) the Company does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their maturity or the ability to unilaterally cause the holder to return specific assets.


Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications

Income Taxes

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined using the balance sheet method. Under this method, the net deferred tax asset or liability is determined based on the tax effects of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of the various balance sheet assets and liabilities and gives current recognition to changes in tax rates and laws.

When tax returns are filed, it is likely that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the applicable taxing authority, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, the Company believes it is more-likely-than-not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than fifty percent (50%) likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured, as described above, is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the applicable taxing authority upon examination. Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as additional income taxes in the statement of operations. The Company has 0 uncertain tax positions.

Share-based Compensation

Compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions is measured based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.  Compensation cost for all stock awards is calculated and recognized over the employees’ service period, generally defined as the vesting period. For awards with graded-vesting, compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Additional information about the Company’s share-based compensation plans is presented in Note 12.

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share represent income available to common shareholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been madeoutstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to prior period balancesincome that would result from the assumed issuance. Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate solely to conformrestricted stock and are determined using the treasury method.  Earnings per share calculations are presented in Note 11.

53


Table of Contents

Comprehensive Income

Accounting principles generally require that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities, such as unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities, changes in defined benefit plan assets and liabilities, and unrealized gains and losses on cash flow hedging instruments are reported as a separate component of the equity section of the balance sheet, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income. These components are presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company recognizes derivative financial instruments in the consolidated balance sheets at fair value.  The fair value of a derivative is determined by quoted market prices and mathematical models using current and historical data. If certain hedging criteria are met, including testing for hedge effectiveness, special hedge accounting may be applied. The Company assesses each hedge, both at inception and on an ongoing basis, to determine whether the derivative used in a hedging transaction is effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the hedged item and whether the derivative is expected to remain effective during subsequent periods. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when (i) it determines that a derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of a hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (iii) probability exists that the forecasted transaction will no longer occur or; (iv) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. When hedge accounting is discontinued and a derivative remains outstanding, the Company recognizes the derivative in the balance sheet at its fair value and changes in the fair value are recognized in net income.

At inception, the Company designates a derivative as (i) a fair value hedge of recognized assets or liabilities or of unrecognized firm commitments (fair value hedge) or (ii) a hedge of forecasted transactions or variable cash flows to be received or paid in conjunction with recognized assets or liabilities (cash flow hedge). For a derivative treated as a fair value hedge, a change in fair value is recorded as an adjustment to the current year presentation.  No reclassifications werehedged item and recognized in net income. For a derivative treated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of a change in fair value is recorded as an adjustment to the hedged item and recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within shareholders’ equity. For a derivative treated as a cash flow hedge, the ineffective portion of a change in fair value is recorded as an adjustment to the hedged item and recognized in net income. For more information on derivative financial instruments see Note 16.

Wealth Management Services Division

Securities and other property held by the Wealth Management Services division in a fiduciary or agency capacity are not assets of the Company and are not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Marketing

The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of marketing, including advertising, to expense as incurred.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair values of financial instruments are estimated using relevant information and assumptions, as more fully disclosed in Note 18. Fair value estimates involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment. Changes in assumptions or in market conditions could significantly affect those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The majority of the Company's revenues are associated with financial instruments, including loans and there was no effectsecurities.  The Company’s noninterest income includes trust, estate and brokerage fee income, service charges on deposits accounts and net interchange fee income.  Substantially all of the Company's revenue is generated from contracts with customers. Noninterest income (loss).streams are discussed below. 

Trust, estate and brokerage fee income – Income is primarily comprised of fees earned from the management and administration of trusts, estates and other customer assets and by providing investment brokerage services. Fees that are transaction-based (e.g., execution of trades) are recognized on a monthly basis. Other fees, or commissions, are earned over time as the contracted monthly or quarterly services are provided and are generally assessed based on either account activity or the market value of assets under management.


Service charges on deposit accounts – The Company earns fees from its deposit customers for overdraft and account maintenance services. Overdraft fees are recognized when the overdraft occurs. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. The Company also earns fees from its customers for transaction-based services. Such services include safe deposit box, ATM, stop payment and wire transfer fees. In each case, these service charges and fees are recognized in income at the time or within the same period that the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied.

35

54


Table of Contents

Interchange fee income, net –  The Company earns interchange fees from debit and credit cardholder transactions conducted through various payment networks. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

and Other Regulatory Statements

In JanuaryJune 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”(the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-01, “Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” The amendments in ASU 2016-01, among other things: (1) Require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting, or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (2) Require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (3) Require separate presentation of financial assets and liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (i.e., securities or loans and receivables); and (4) Eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently assessing the impact  that ASU 2016-01 will have on its consolidated financial statements.


In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” Among other things, in the amendments in ASU 2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: (1) A lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective  approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. To date, the Company has not completed its comprehensive analysis of those leases and is unable to quantify the impact at this time. The Company does not expect the new standard to have a material effect on its expense recognition pattern or, in turn, its consolidated financial statements.

During June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.”  The amendments, in this ASU, among other things, require the measurement of all expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. Many of the loss estimation techniques applied today will still be permitted, although the inputs to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expected credit losses. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for credit losses on available for sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. The amendmentsFASB has issued multiple updates to ASU No. 2016-13 as codified in thisTopic 326, including ASU are effectiveNos. 2019-04, 2019-05, 2019-10, 2019-11, 2020-02, and 2020-03.  These ASUs have provided for various minor technical corrections and improvements to the codification as well as other transition matters.  Smaller reporting companies who file with the Securities and Exchange Commission filers(“SEC”) and all other entities who do not file with the SEC are required to apply the guidance for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019.2022. Changes under ASU No. 2016-13 and subsequent updates represent a fundamental shift from existing GAAP and may result in a material increase to the Company's accounting for credit losses on financial instruments. To prepare for implementation of the new standard the Company established a working group to evaluate the impact these changes will have on the Company’s financial statements and related disclosures. The Company's management is addressing compliance requirements, data gatheringCompany also contracted with a third-party for credit modeling in accordance with ASU No. 2016-13.  The Company has focused on model validations, the development of processes and archiving resources,related controls, and analyzing the potential impactevaluation of this standard.

Duringparallel runs. The Company has not yet determined an estimate of the effect of these changes.

Effective November 25, 2019, the SEC adopted Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) 119.  SAB 119 updated portions of the SEC’s interpretative guidance to align with FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326, “Financial Instruments – Credit Losses.”  The SAB covers topics including (i) measuring current expected credit losses; (ii) development, governance, and documentation of a systematic methodology; (iii) documenting the results of a systematic methodology; and (iv) validating a systematic methodology.

In August 2016,2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, “Statement2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): “Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.”  ASU No. 2018-13 modified the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements by requiring that Level 3 fair value disclosures include the range and weighted average of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classificationsignificant unobservable inputs used to develop those fair value measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements. Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”, to address diversitydisclosure requirements in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The amendments areTopic 820 were also removed or modified. ASU No. 2018-13 was effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years.the Company on January 1, 2020.  The amendments should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If retrospective application is impractical for some of the issues addressed by the update, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company does not expect theCompany’s adoption of ASU 2016-15 to haveNo. 2018-13 has not had a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


During January 2017,

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of Business.” The amendments in this ASU clarify the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. Under the current implementation guidance in Topic 805, there are three elements of a business - inputs, processes,  and outputs. While an integrated set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) that is a business usually has outputs, outputs are not required to be present. In addition, all the inputs and processes that a seller uses in operating a set are not required if market participants can acquire the set and continue to produce outputs. The amendments in this ASU provide a screen to determine when a set is not a business. If the screen is not met, the amendments (1) require that to be considered a business, a set must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output and (2) remove the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The ASU provides a framework to assist entities in evaluating whether both an input and a substantive process are present. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. No disclosures are required at transition. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.


During March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07.2018-14, “Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)- Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20): ImprovingDisclosure Framework - Changes to the PresentationDisclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans.”  These amendments modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. Certain disclosure requirements were deleted while the following disclosure requirements were added: the weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates and an explanation of Net Periodic Pension Costthe reasons for significant gains and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.”losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period. The amendments also clarify the disclosure requirements in this ASU require an employerparagraph 715-20-50-3, which state that offersthe following information for defined benefit pension plans other postretirementshould be disclosed: The projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) and fair value of plan assets for plans or other typeswith PBOs in excess of benefits accountedplan assets and the accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) and fair value of plan assets for under Topic 715 to report the service cost componentplans with ABOs in excess of net periodic benefit cost in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component. If separate line item(s) are not used, the line item(s) used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization as part of an asset, when applicable.plan assets. The amendments are effective for annual periods beginningfiscal years ending after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods.2020. Early adoption is permitted.  The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-07No. 2018-14 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During March 2017,

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, “Receivables – Nonrefundable Fees2019-12, “Income Taxes (Topic 740) - Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.”  This ASU is expected to reduce the cost and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.” The amendmentscomplexity related to the accounting for income taxes by removing specific exceptions to general principles in this ASU shortenTopic 740 (eliminating the amortization periodneed for an organization to analyze whether certain exceptions apply in a given period) and improving financial statement preparers’ application of certain callable debt securities purchased at a premium. Upon adoptionincome tax-related guidance. This ASU is part of the standard, premiums on these qualifying callable debt securities will be amortizedFASB’s

55


Table of Contents

simplification initiative to the earliest call date. Discounts on purchased debt securities will continuemake narrow-scope simplifications and improvements to be accreted to maturity. Theaccounting standards through a series of short-term projects.  For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. Upon transition, entities should apply the guidance on a modified retrospective basis, with a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption and provide the disclosures required for a change in accounting principle. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2017-08 will have on its consolidated financial statements.


During May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting.” The amendments in this ASU provide guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. The amendments are effective for all entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU 2017-09 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

During August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities.” The amendments in this ASU modify the designation and measurement guidance for hedge accounting as well as provide for increased transparency regarding the presentation of economic results on both the financial statements and related footnotes. Certain aspects of hedge effectiveness assessments will also be simplified upon implementation of this update. The amendments are effective for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

During February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, “Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.” The amendments provide financial statement preparers with an option to reclassify stranded tax effects within accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings in each period in which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate in the Tax Act (or portion thereof) is recorded.  The amendments are effective for all organizations for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted. Organizations should applyThe Company is currently assessing the proposed amendments either inimpact that ASU No. 2019-12 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In January 2020, the period of adoption or retrospectively to each period (or periods) in whichFASB issued ASU No. 2020-01, “Investments - Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) – Clarifying the effectInteractions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815.”  This ASU is based on a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force and is expected to increase comparability in accounting for these transactions.  ASU No. 2016-01 made targeted improvements to accounting for financial instruments, including providing an entity the ability to measure certain equity securities without a readily determinable fair value at cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer.  Among other topics, the amendments clarified that an entity should consider observable transactions that require it to either apply or discontinue the equity method of accounting.  For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2020-01 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04 “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.” These amendments provide temporary optional guidance to ease the potential burden in accounting for reference rate reform. This ASU also provides optional expedients and exceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) or another reference rate expected to be discontinued. It is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. The guidance is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022.  Subsequently, in January 2021, the FASB issued ASU No. 2021-01 “Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope.” This ASU clarifies that certain optional expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 for contract modifications and hedge accounting apply to derivatives that are affected by the discounting transition. The ASU also amends the expedients and exceptions in Topic 848 to capture the incremental consequences of the scope clarification and to tailor the existing guidance to derivative instruments affected by the discounting transition. An entity may elect to apply ASU No. 2021-01 on contract modifications that change the interest rate used for margining, discounting, or contract price alignment retrospectively as of any date from the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020, or prospectively to new modifications from any date within the interim period that includes or is subsequent to January 7, 2021, up to the date that financial statements are available to be issued. An entity may elect to apply ASU No. 2021-01 to eligible hedging relationships existing as of the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020, and to new eligible hedging relationships entered into after the beginning of the interim period that includes March 12, 2020.  The Company is assessing ASU 2020-04 and its impact on the Company’s transition away from LIBOR for its loan and other financial instruments.  

On March 12, 2020, the SEC finalized amendments to its definitions of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer.”  The amendments increase the threshold criteria for meeting these filer classifications and are effective on April 27, 2020. Any changes in filer status are to be applied beginning with the U.S. federal corporate income tax ratefiler’s first annual report filed with the SEC subsequent to the effective date.  For the Company, this will be its annual report on Form 10-K with respect to the year ending December 31, 2020.  Pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the classifications of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” require a public company to obtain an external auditor attestation concerning the effectiveness of a company’s internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”) and include the opinion on ICFR in the Tax Act is recognized.its annual report on Form 10-K. The Company has elected to reclassifycomplied with such requirements during the stranded income tax effectsyears it was considered an accelerated filer.  The SEC’s March 2020 definition amendments exclude from the Taxaccelerated filer and large accelerated filer definitions an issuer that (i) is eligible to be a smaller reporting company and (ii) had annual revenues of less than $100 million in the most recent fiscal year.  Such entity can now be considered a “non-accelerated filer.”  With respect to the 2020 fiscal year, the Company continues to be a smaller reporting company and is no longer be considered an accelerated filer.  

In March 2020 (revised in April 2020), various regulatory agencies, including the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (collectively, “the agencies”), issued an interagency statement on loan modifications and reporting for financial institutions working with customers affected by COVID-19. The interagency statement was effective immediately and impacted accounting for loan modifications. Under ASC 310-40, “Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors,” a restructuring of debt constitutes a TDR if the creditor, for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties, grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider. The agencies confirmed with the staff of the FASB that short-term modifications made on a good faith basis in response to COVID-19 to borrowers who were current prior to any relief, are not to be

56


Table of Contents

considered TDRs. This includes short-term modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or other delays in payment that are insignificant. Borrowers considered current are those that are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a modification program is implemented.  In August 2020, a joint statement on additional loan modifications was issued.  Among other things, the Interagency Statement addresses accounting and regulatory reporting considerations for loan modifications, including those accounted for under Section 4013 of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act.  The CARES Act inwas signed into law on March 27, 2020 to help support individuals and businesses through loans, grants, tax changes and other types of relief.  The most significant impacts of the Act related to accounting for loan modifications and establishment of the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”).  On December 21, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriates Act of 2021 (“CAA”) was passed.  The CAA extends or modifies many of the relief programs first created by the CARES Act, including the PPP and treatment of certain loan modifications related to the COVID-19 pandemic.  See Note 3 of the consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure of TDRs as of December 31, 2020.  

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-06 “Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity.” The ASU simplifies accounting for convertible instruments by removing major separation models required under current U.S. GAAP. Consequently, more convertible debt instruments will be reported as a single liability instrument and more convertible preferred stock as a single equity instrument with no separate accounting for embedded conversion features. The ASU removes certain settlement conditions that are required for equity contracts to qualify for the derivative scope exception. The ASU also simplifies the diluted earnings per share calculation in certain areas. In addition, the amendment updates the disclosure requirements for convertible instruments to increase the information transparency. For public business entities, excluding smaller reporting companies, the amendments in the ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  For all other entities, the standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2020-06 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In October 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-08, “Codification Improvements to Subtopic 310-20, Receivables – Nonrefundable fees and Other Costs.” This ASU clarifies that an entity should reevaluate whether a callable debt security is within the scope of ASC paragraph 310-20-35-33 for each reporting period. For public business entities, the ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is not permitted. ASU No. 2020-08 states that all entities should apply the amendments in this ASU on a prospective basis as of the beginning of the period ending December 31, 2017.of adoption for existing or newly purchased callable debt securities. The amountCompany does not expect the adoption of this reclassification in 2017 was $21,000.


ASU 2020-06 to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Note 2.

Securities


The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale, with unrealized gains and lossesare summarized as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(In thousands)

 

Amortized

Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

(Losses)

 

 

Fair

Value

 

Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies

 

$

57,486

 

 

$

1,759

 

 

$

(35

)

 

$

59,210

 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

22,016

 

 

 

1,623

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

23,638

 

 

 

$

79,502

 

 

$

3,382

 

 

$

(36

)

 

$

82,848

 


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

 

Amortized

Cost

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

Gains

 

 

Gross

Unrealized

(Losses)

 

 

Fair

Value

 

Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies

 

$

63,090

 

 

$

937

 

 

$

(86

)

 

$

63,941

 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

15,054

 

 

 

802

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

15,842

 

 

 

$

78,144

 

 

$

1,739

 

 

$

(100

)

 

$

79,783

 

  December 31, 2017 
(In thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)
  
Fair
Value
 
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $52,872  $113  $(608) $52,377 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions  15,124   191   (60)  15,255 
Corporate bonds  3,816   476   (153)  4,139 
Mutual funds  386      (4)  382 
  $72,198  $780  $(825) $72,153 

  December 31, 2016 
(In thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)
  
Fair
Value
 
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $40,781  $182  $(459) $40,504 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions  6,228   100   (18)  6,310 
Corporate bonds  3,743      (958)  2,785 
Mutual funds  378      (4)  374 
  $51,130  $282  $(1,439) $49,973 

The amortized cost and fair value of securities available for sale, by contractual maturity, are shown below.  Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations without penalties.

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(In thousands)

 

Amortized

Cost

 

 

Fair

Value

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

2,054

 

 

$

2,072

 

Due after one year through five years

 

 

7,934

 

 

 

8,419

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

 

8,972

 

 

 

9,467

 

Due after ten years

 

 

60,542

 

 

 

62,890

 

 

 

$

79,502

 

 

$

82,848

 


  December 31, 2017 
 
(In thousands)
 
Amortized
Cost
  
Fair
Value
 
Due in one year or less $1,320  $1,319 
Due after one year through five years  5,400   5,340 
Due after five years through ten years  22,834   22,792 
Due after ten years  42,258   42,320 
Mutual funds  386   382 
  $72,198  $72,153 

Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal repayments of securities available for sale during 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 were $12.9$16.2 million, $14.2$8.2 million and $13.3$11.7 million, respectively.  GainsProceeds from the sales of securities available for sale during 2020 and 2019 were $18.8 million and $13.9 million, respectively.  There were 0 sales of securities available for sale during 2018.  Net gains on sales and/or calls of securities available for sale were $1,000$992,000, $79,000, and $4,000,$838,000 during 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.  There were no gains from calls of securitiesSecurities available for sale during 2017. Securities available for saletotaling $34.2$35.8 million, $9.9$27.6 million and $11.8$12.4 million were purchased in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015, respectively. There were no OTTI losses on the investment in pooled trust preferred securities in 2017, 2016 and 2015.


2018, respectively.

The following table shows the Companypresents securities with gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.

(In thousands)

 

Less than 12 Months

 

 

12 Months or More

 

 

Total

 

December 31, 2020

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Unrealized

(Losses)

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Unrealized

(Losses)

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Unrealized

(Losses)

 

Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies

 

$

7,958

 

 

$

(35

)

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

7,958

 

 

$

(35

)

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

508

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

508

 

 

 

(1

)

Total temporarily impaired securities

 

$

8,466

 

 

$

(36

)

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

8,466

 

 

$

(36

)

(In thousands)

 

Less than 12 Months

 

 

12 Months or More

 

 

Total

 

December 31, 2019

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Unrealized

(Losses)

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Unrealized

(Losses)

 

 

Fair

Value

 

 

Unrealized

(Losses)

 

Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies

 

$

11,460

 

 

$

(42

)

 

$

5,651

 

 

$

(44

)

 

$

17,111

 

 

$

(86

)

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

2,049

 

 

 

(14

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

2,049

 

 

 

(14

)

Total temporarily impaired securities

 

$

13,509

 

 

$

(56

)

 

$

5,651

 

 

$

(44

)

 

$

19,160

 

 

$

(100

)

(In thousands) Less than 12 Months  12 Months or More  Total 
December 31, 2017 
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
(Losses)
  
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
(Losses)
  
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
(Losses)
 
                   
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $32,512  $(330) $10,008  $(278) $42,520  $(608)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions  4,172   (60)        4,172   (60)
Corporate bonds        1,540   (153)  1,540   (153)
Mutual funds  382   (4)        382   (4)
Total temporary impaired securities $37,066  $(394) $11,548  $(431) $48,614  $(825)

(In thousands) Less than 12 Months  12 Months or More  Total 
December 31, 2016 
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
(Losses)
  
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
(Losses)
  
Fair
Value
  
Unrealized
(Losses)
 
                   
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $18,942  $(400) $1,507  $(59) $20,449  $(459)
Obligations of states and political subdivisions  293   (18)        293   (18)
Corporate bonds  503   (136)  2,283   (822)  2,786   (958)
Mutual funds  374   (4)        374   (4)
Total temporary impaired securities $20,112  $(558) $3,790  $(881) $23,902  $(1,439)

At December 31, 2017,2020, there were 535 securities totaling $8.5 million of aggregate fair value considered temporarily impaired.  The primary cause of the temporary impairments in the Company’s investments in debt securities was fluctuations in interest rates. The Company concluded that were0 other-than-temporary impairment existed in a loss position due to market conditions, primarily interest rates, and not due to credit concerns.


The nature ofits securities which were impairedportfolio at December 31, 2017 consisted2020, and 0 other-than-temporary impairment loss has been recognized in net income, based primarily on the fact that changes in fair value were caused primarily by fluctuations in interest rates, there were 0 securities with unrealized losses that were significant relative to their carrying amounts, 0 securities have been in an unrealized loss position continuously for more than 12 months, securities with unrealized losses had generally high credit quality, the Company intends to hold these investments in debt securities to maturity and it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will not be required to sell these investments before a recovery of three corporate bonds with a cost basis netits investment, and issuers have continued to make timely payments of OTTI losses totaling $3.8 millionprincipal and a temporary loss of approximately $153,000. The value of these bonds is based on quoted market prices for similar assets. These corporate bonds areinterest. Additionally, the “Class B” or subordinated “mezzanine” tranche of pooled trust preferred securities. The trust preferredCompany’s mortgage-backed securities are collateralizedentirely issued by either U.S. government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprises.  Collectively, these entities provide a guarantee, which is either explicitly or implicitly supported by the interestfull faith and principal payments made on trust preferred capital offerings by a geographically diversified poolcredit of approximately 55 different financial institutions per bond. They have an estimated average maturity of 16 years. These bonds could have been called at par on the five year anniversary date of issuance, which has already passed for all three bonds. The bonds reprice every three months at a fixed rate index above the 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). These bonds have sufficient collateralization and cash flow projections to satisfy their valuation based on the cash flow as of December 31, 2017. All three bonds, totaling $4.1 million at fair value, are projected to repay the full outstanding interest andU.S. government, that investors in such mortgage-backed securities will receive timely principal and are classified as performing corporate bond investments. During 2017, $214,000 of interest income was recorded.

Additional information regarding each of the pooled trust preferred securities as of December 31, 2017 follows:

(In thousands)
Cost, net of
OTTI loss
  
Fair
Value(1)
  
Percent of
Underlying
Collateral
Performing
  
Percent of
Underlying
Collateral in
Deferral
  
Percent of
Underlying
Collateral in
Default
  
Cumulative
Amount of
OTTI Loss
  
Cumulative Other
Comprehensive
(Gain) Loss, net of
tax benefit
 
$1,693  $1,540   81.0%  2.9%  16.1% $325  $101 
 1,465   1,850   87.0%  4.0%  9.0%  535   (254)
 658   749   89.0%  4.3%  6.7%  341   (60)
$3,816  $4,139              $1,201  $(213)
(1)Current Moody's Ratings range from B2 to Ba2.

The following roll forward reflects the amount, in thousands, related to credit losses recognized in earnings:

Beginning balance as of December 31, 2016 $1,215 
Less: Increases in cash flows expected to be collected that are recognized over the remaining life of the  security  (14)
Ending balance as of December 31, 2017 $1,201 

payments.  

The carrying value of securities pledged to secure deposits and for other purposes amounted to $47.6$13.1 million and $41.9$16.6 million at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.



58


Table of Contents

Note 3.Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

Note 3.Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company’s allowance for loan losses has three basic components: the specific allowance, the general allowance, and the unallocated component. The specific allowance is used to individually allocate an allowance for larger balance, non-homogeneous loans identified as impaired. The general allowance is used for estimating the loss on pools of smaller balance, homogeneous loans;loans, including 1-4 family mortgage loans, installment loans and other consumer loans. Also, the general allowance is used for the remaining pool of larger balance, non-homogeneous loans which were not identified as impaired. The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.


On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted to, among other provisions, provide emergency assistance for individuals, families and businesses affected by COVID-19.  A provision in the CARES Act included the creation of the PPP through the Small Business Administration (“SBA”).  Loans provided by the Bank through the PPP may be forgiven based on the borrowers’ compliance with the terms of the program.  The SBA provides a 100% guaranty to the lender of principal and interest, unless the lender violates an obligation under the agreement.  As loan losses are expected to be immaterial, if any at all, due to the SBA guaranty, there is no provision allocated for PPP loans within the allowance for loan loss calculation.  As of December 31, 2020, the Bank’s Commercial and Industrial loan segment included the origination of 549 PPP loans, totaling $53.1 million, and under the terms of the PPP, subsequently issued forgiveness for 223 PPP loans, with an aggregate principal balance of $22.6 million.    

The following table presents the activity in the allowance for loan losses by portfolio segment for each of the years endingended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(In thousands)

 

Commercial

and Industrial

 

 

Commercial Real Estate

 

 

Construction and Land

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Student

 

 

Residential

Real Estate

 

 

Home Equity

Lines of Credit

 

 

Unallocated

 

 

Total

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance, December 31, 2019

 

$

296

 

 

$

1,788

 

 

$

652

 

 

$

154

 

 

$

65

 

 

$

1,596

 

 

$

326

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

5,227

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(148

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(34

)

 

 

(15

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(197

)

Recoveries

 

 

13

 

 

 

24

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

30

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

67

 

Provision (recovery)

 

 

590

 

 

 

522

 

 

 

428

 

 

 

(24

)

 

 

31

 

 

 

243

 

 

 

(17

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,773

 

Ending balance, December 31, 2020

 

$

751

 

 

$

2,334

 

 

$

1,080

 

 

$

126

 

 

$

81

 

 

$

1,839

 

 

$

309

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

6,870

 

Ending balances individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

20

 

 

$

52

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

72

 

Ending balances collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

731

 

 

$

2,282

 

 

$

1,080

 

 

$

126

 

 

$

81

 

 

$

1,839

 

 

$

309

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

6,798

 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

509

 

 

$

8,345

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

754

 

 

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

9,608

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

67,881

 

 

 

192,345

 

 

 

73,966

 

 

 

6,355

 

 

 

6,971

 

 

 

230,131

 

 

 

29,492

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

607,141

 

Ending balance, December 31, 2020

 

$

68,390

 

 

$

200,690

 

 

$

73,966

 

 

$

6,355

 

 

$

6,971

 

 

$

230,885

 

 

$

29,492

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

616,749

 

  December 31, 2017 
(In thousands) 
Commercial
and Industrial
  
Commercial
Real Estate
  
Construction
and Land
  Consumer  Student  
Residential
Real Estate
  
Home Equity
Lines of Credit
  Unallocated  Total 
Allowance for loan losses                           
Beginning balance, December 31, 2016 $561  $1,569  $661  $21  $76  $943  $307  $387  $4,525 
Charge-offs  (19)  (476)     (114)  (31)  (51)        (691)
Recoveries  154   575      2      6   3      740 
Provision (recovery)  (178)  (59)  218   196   27   276   77   (37)  520 
Ending balance, December 31, 2017 $518  $1,609  $879  $105  $72  $1,174  $387  $350  $5,094 
Ending balances individually evaluated for impairment $247  $257  $357  $  $  $  $51  $  $912 
Ending balances collectively evaluated for impairment $271  $1,352  $522  $105  $72  $1,174  $336  $350  $4,182 
Loans                                    
Individually evaluated for impairment $758  $3,631  $5,234  $  $  $581  $658      $10,862 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  23,655   173,196   48,928   5,068   10,677   186,523   43,890       491,937 
Ending balance, December 31, 2017 $24,413  $176,827  $54,162  $5,068  $10,677  $187,104  $44,548      $502,799 

39

59


Table of Contents

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

 

Commercial and Industrial

 

 

Commercial Real Estate

 

 

Construction and Land

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Student

 

 

Residential

Real Estate

 

 

Home Equity

Lines of Credit

 

 

Unallocated

 

 

Total

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance, December 31, 2018

 

$

483

 

 

$

1,738

 

 

$

635

 

 

$

145

 

 

$

68

 

 

$

1,311

 

 

$

446

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

5,176

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(328

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(50

)

 

 

(13

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

(391

)

Recoveries

 

 

2

 

 

 

80

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

14

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

96

 

Provision

 

 

139

 

 

 

(30

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

45

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

285

 

 

 

(120

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

346

 

Ending balance, December 31, 2019

 

$

296

 

 

$

1,788

 

 

$

652

 

 

$

154

 

 

$

65

 

 

$

1,596

 

 

$

326

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

5,227

 

Ending balances individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

0

 

 

$

229

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

229

 

Ending balances collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

296

 

 

$

1,559

 

 

$

652

 

 

$

154

 

 

$

65

 

 

$

1,596

 

 

$

326

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

4,998

 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

187

 

 

$

2,847

 

 

$

233

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

379

 

 

$

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,646

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

27,217

 

 

 

179,051

 

 

 

64,998

 

 

 

5,958

 

 

 

8,151

 

 

 

224,937

 

 

 

36,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

546,580

 

Ending balance, December 31, 2019

 

$

27,404

 

 

$

181,898

 

 

$

65,231

 

 

$

5,958

 

 

$

8,151

 

 

$

225,316

 

 

$

36,268

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

550,226

 

 

 

December 31, 2018

 

(In thousands)

 

Commercial and Industrial

 

 

Commercial Real Estate

 

 

Construction and Land

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Student

 

 

Residential

Real Estate

 

 

Home Equity

Lines of Credit

 

 

Unallocated

 

 

Total

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance, December 31, 2017

 

$

518

 

 

$

1,609

 

 

$

879

 

 

$

105

 

 

$

72

 

 

$

1,174

 

 

$

387

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

5,094

 

Charge-offs

 

 

(106

)

 

 

(47

)

 

 

(312

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(24

)

 

 

(200

)

 

 

(80

)

 

 

0

 

 

 

(783

)

Recoveries

 

 

35

 

 

 

70

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

248

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

358

 

Provision (recovery)

 

 

36

 

 

 

106

 

 

 

68

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

20

 

 

 

89

 

 

 

138

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

507

 

Ending balance, December 31, 2018

 

$

483

 

 

$

1,738

 

 

$

635

 

 

$

145

 

 

$

68

 

 

$

1,311

 

 

$

446

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

5,176

 

Ending balances individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

176

 

 

$

159

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

68

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

403

 

Ending balances collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

307

 

 

$

1,579

 

 

$

635

 

 

$

145

 

 

$

68

 

 

$

1,311

 

 

$

378

 

 

$

350

 

 

$

4,773

 

Loans

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

522

 

 

$

3,191

 

 

$

2,679

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

707

 

 

$

567

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

7,666

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

 

26,199

 

 

 

184,606

 

 

 

68,730

 

 

 

5,562

 

 

 

9,158

 

 

 

205,238

 

 

 

42,205

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

541,698

 

Ending balance, December 31, 2018

 

$

26,721

 

 

$

187,797

 

 

$

71,409

 

 

$

5,562

 

 

$

9,158

 

 

$

205,945

 

 

$

42,772

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

549,364

 

  December 31, 2016 
(In thousands) 
Commercial
and Industrial
  
Commercial
Real Estate
  
Construction
and Land
  Consumer  Student  
Residential
Real Estate
  
Home Equity
Lines of Credit
  Unallocated  Total 
Allowance for loan losses                           
Beginning balance, December 31, 2015 $526  $1,162  $924  $13  $117  $886  $356  $209  $4,193 
Charge-offs  (226)  (380)     (46)  (36)  (36)        (724)
Recoveries  1,527   24      10         3      1,564 
Provision (recovery)  (1,266)  763   (263)  44   (5)  93   (52)  178   (508)
Ending balance, December 31, 2016 $561  $1,569  $661  $21  $76  $943  $307  $387  $4,525 
Ending balances individually evaluated for impairment $100  $398  $309  $  $  $73  $  $  $880 
Ending balances collectively evaluated for impairment $461  $1,171  $352  $21  $76  $870  $307  $387  $3,645 
Loans                                    
Individually evaluated for impairment $227  $3,273  $3,504  $  $  $1,410  $70      $8,484 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  25,508   161,998   46,273   3,100   13,006   160,973   43,791       454,649 
Ending balance, December 31, 2016 $25,735  $165,271  $49,777  $3,100  $13,006  $162,383  $43,861      $463,133 
  December 31, 2015 
(In thousands) 
Commercial
and Industrial
  
Commercial
Real Estate
  
Construction
and Land
  Consumer  Student  
Residential
Real Estate
  
Home Equity
Lines of Credit
  Unallocated  Total 
Allowance for loan losses                           
Beginning balance, December 31, 2014 $516  $1,943  $699  $37  $72  $1,424  $296  $404  $5,391 
Charge-offs  (8,525)  (568)  (17)  (10)  (50)  (167)  (50)     (9,387)
Recoveries  102         14      52   21      189 
Provision (recovery)  8,433   (213)  242   (28)  95   (423)  89   (195)  8,000 
Ending balance at December 31, 2015 $526  $1,162  $924  $13  $117  $886  $356  $209  $4,193 
Ending balances individually evaluated for impairment $111  $  $296  $  $  $  $  $  $407 
Ending balances collectively evaluated for impairment $415  $1,162  $628  $13  $117  $886  $356  $209  $3,786 
Loans                                    
Individually evaluated for impairment $217  $2,896  $3,515  $     $419  $70      $7,117 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  23,488   157,140   46,340   3,160   15,518   150,156   43,943       439,745 
Ending balance, December 31, 2015 $23,705  $160,036  $49,855  $3,160  $15,518  $150,575  $44,013      $446,862 

The following tables present the recorded investment in loans

Loans by class of loan that have been classified according to the internal classification systemcredit quality indicators as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively:2019 are summarized as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(In thousands)

 

Commercial and Industrial

 

 

Commercial Real Estate

 

 

Construction and Land

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Student

 

 

Residential

Real Estate

 

 

Home Equity

Lines of Credit

 

 

Total

 

Grade:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass

 

$

67,499

 

 

$

189,656

 

 

$

71,630

 

 

$

6,352

 

 

$

6,971

 

 

$

223,681

 

 

$

27,650

 

 

$

593,439

 

Special mention

 

 

348

 

 

 

9,273

 

 

 

2,273

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

319

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

12,216

 

Substandard

 

 

543

 

 

 

1,761

 

 

 

63

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,885

 

 

 

1,842

 

 

 

11,094

 

Doubtful

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Loss

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Total

 

$

68,390

 

 

$

200,690

 

 

$

73,966

 

 

$

6,355

 

 

$

6,971

 

 

$

230,885

 

 

$

29,492

 

 

$

616,749

 


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

 

Commercial and Industrial

 

 

Commercial Real Estate

 

 

Construction and Land

 

 

Consumer

 

 

Student

 

 

Residential

Real Estate

 

 

Home Equity Lines of Credit

 

 

Total

 

Grade:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pass

 

$

26,555

 

 

$

175,063

 

 

$

62,231

 

 

$

5,955

 

 

$

8,151

 

 

$

218,686

 

 

$

34,218

 

 

$

530,859

 

Special mention

 

 

422

 

 

 

3,487

 

 

 

2,594

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

336

 

 

 

127

 

 

 

6,969

 

Substandard

 

 

427

 

 

 

3,348

 

 

 

406

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

6,294

 

 

 

1,923

 

 

 

12,398

 

Doubtful

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Loss

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Total

 

$

27,404

 

 

$

181,898

 

 

$

65,231

 

 

$

5,958

 

 

$

8,151

 

 

$

225,316

 

 

$

36,268

 

 

$

550,226

 

  December 31, 2017 
(In thousands) 
Commercial
and Industrial
  
Commercial
Real Estate
  
Construction
and Land
  Consumer  Student  
Residential
Real Estate
  
Home Equity
Lines of Credit
  Total 
Grade:                        
Pass $21,769  $167,625  $44,006  $5,065  $10,677  $180,119  $40,373  $469,634 
Special mention  1,152   4,243   143   3      763   813   7,117 
Substandard  1,492   4,959   10,013         6,222   3,362   26,048 
Doubtful                        
Loss                        
Total $24,413  $176,827  $54,162  $5,068  $10,677  $187,104  $44,548  $502,799 

  December 31, 2016 
(In thousands) 
Commercial
and Industrial
  
Commercial
Real Estate
  
Construction
and Land
  Consumer  Student  
Residential
Real Estate
  
Home Equity
Lines of Credit
  Total 
Grade:                        
Pass $20,956  $153,486  $39,342  $3,097  $13,006  $152,730  $40,253  $422,870 
Special mention  3,007   4,691   6,525   3      1,890   890   17,006 
Substandard  1,772   7,094   3,910         7,763   2,718   23,257 
Doubtful                        
Loss                        
Total $25,735  $165,271  $49,777  $3,100  $13,006  $162,383  $43,861  $463,133 

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due loans and nonaccrualstatus of loans as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016 by loan class.2019 are summarized as follows:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(In thousands)

 

30-59 Days

Past Due

 

 

60-89 Days

Past Due

 

 

90+ Days

Past Due

 

 

Total Past Due

 

 

Current

 

 

Total Loans

 

 

90+ Days

Past Due

and Accruing

 

 

Nonaccruals

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

38

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

510

 

 

$

548

 

 

$

67,842

 

 

$

68,390

 

 

$

1

 

 

$

509

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

357

 

 

 

357

 

 

 

200,333

 

 

 

200,690

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

357

 

Construction and land

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

73,966

 

 

 

73,966

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Consumer

 

 

9

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

9

 

 

 

6,346

 

 

 

6,355

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Student

 

 

430

 

 

 

427

 

 

 

583

 

 

 

1,440

 

 

 

5,531

 

 

 

6,971

 

 

 

583

 

 

 

0

 

Residential real estate

 

 

768

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

379

 

 

 

1,147

 

 

 

229,738

 

 

 

230,885

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

379

 

Home equity lines of credit

 

 

111

 

 

 

324

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

435

 

 

 

29,057

 

 

 

29,492

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Total

 

$

1,356

 

 

$

751

 

 

$

1,829

 

 

$

3,936

 

 

$

612,813

 

 

$

616,749

 

 

$

584

 

 

$

1,245

 


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

 

30-59 Days

Past Due

 

 

60-89 Days

Past Due

 

 

90+ Days

Past Due

 

 

Total Past Due

 

 

Current

 

 

Total Loans

 

 

90+ Days

Past Due

and Accruing

 

 

Nonaccruals

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

330

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

34

 

 

$

364

 

 

$

27,040

 

 

$

27,404

 

 

$

34

 

 

$

0

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

989

 

 

 

989

 

 

 

180,909

 

 

 

181,898

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

989

 

Construction and land

 

 

5,472

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

5,472

 

 

 

59,759

 

 

 

65,231

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Consumer

 

 

11

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

5,946

 

 

 

5,958

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Student

 

 

345

 

 

 

220

 

 

 

1,204

 

 

 

1,769

 

 

 

6,382

 

 

 

8,151

 

 

 

1,205

 

 

 

0

 

Residential real estate

 

 

739

 

 

 

109

 

 

 

397

 

 

 

1,245

 

 

 

224,071

 

 

 

225,316

 

 

 

397

 

 

 

0

 

Home equity lines of credit

 

 

389

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

389

 

 

 

35,879

 

 

 

36,268

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Total

 

$

7,286

 

 

$

330

 

 

$

2,624

 

 

$

10,240

 

 

$

539,986

 

 

$

550,226

 

 

$

1,636

 

 

$

989

 

  December 31, 2017 
(In thousands) 
30-59 Days
Past Due
  
60-89 Days
Past Due
  
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
  
Total
Past Due
  Current  
Total
Financing
Receivables
  
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
and Accruing
  Nonaccruals 
Commercial and industrial $83  $153  $60  $296  $24,117  $24,413  $49  $140 
Commercial real estate     1,404      1,404   175,423   176,827      936 
Construction and land  430      1,335   1,765   52,397   54,162      1,335 
Consumer  5   22      27   5,041   5,068       
Student  504   512   1,616   2,632   8,045   10,677   1,616    
Residential real estate  637   153      790   186,314   187,104      181 
Home equity lines of credit  337   346   588   1,271   43,277   44,548      588 
Total $1,996  $2,590  $3,599  $8,185  $494,614  $502,799  $1,665  $3,180 

  December 31, 2016 
(In thousands) 
30-59 Days
Past Due
  
60-89 Days
Past Due
  
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
  
Total
Past Due
  Current  
Total
Financing
Receivables
  
Greater than
90 Days
Past Due
and Accruing
  Nonaccruals 
Commercial and industrial $128  $58  $  $186  $25,549  $25,735  $  $187 
Commercial real estate     496   321   817   164,454   165,271   321   496 
Construction and land  237         237   49,540   49,777      1,497 
Consumer  70   3      73   3,027   3,100       
Student  1,163   490   2,538   4,191   8,815   13,006   2,538    
Residential real estate  302      1,343   1,645   160,738   162,383      1,343 
Home equity lines of credit  249   418      667   43,194   43,861       
Total $2,149  $1,465  $4,202  $7,816  $455,317  $463,133  $2,859  $3,523 

The following table presents information related to impaired loans by classportfolio segment as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(In thousands)

 

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Unpaid

Principal

Balance

 

 

Related

Allowance

 

 

Average

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Interest

Income

Recognized

 

With no specific allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

$

7,562

 

 

$

7,562

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

7,944

 

 

$

320

 

Residential real estate

 

 

754

 

 

 

754

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

761

 

 

 

19

 

With an allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

509

 

 

$

509

 

 

$

20

 

 

$

509

 

 

$

3

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

783

 

 

 

783

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

797

 

 

 

36

 

Total:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

509

 

 

$

509

 

 

$

20

 

 

$

509

 

 

$

3

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

8,345

 

 

 

8,345

 

 

 

52

 

 

 

8,741

 

 

 

356

 

Residential real estate

 

 

754

 

 

 

754

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

761

 

 

 

19

 

Total

 

$

9,608

 

 

$

9,608

 

 

$

72

 

 

$

10,011

 

 

$

378

 


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

 

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Unpaid

Principal

Balance

 

 

Related

Allowance

 

 

Average

Recorded

Investment

 

 

Interest

Income

Recognized

 

With no specific allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

187

 

 

$

187

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

287

 

 

$

13

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

1,048

 

 

 

1,048

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

1,213

 

 

 

61

 

Construction and land

 

 

233

 

 

 

233

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

494

 

 

 

25

 

Residential real estate

 

 

379

 

 

 

727

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

384

 

 

 

16

 

With an allowance recorded:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial real estate

 

$

1,799

 

 

$

1,813

 

 

$

229

 

 

$

1,806

 

 

$

38

 

Total:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial and industrial

 

$

187

 

 

$

187

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

287

 

 

$

13

 

Commercial real estate

 

 

2,847

 

 

 

2,861

 

 

 

229

 

 

 

3,019

 

 

 

99

 

Construction and land

 

 

233

 

 

 

233

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

494

 

 

 

25

 

Residential real estate

 

 

379

 

 

 

379

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

384

 

 

 

16

 

Total

 

$

3,646

 

 

$

3,660

 

 

$

229

 

 

$

4,184

 

 

$

153

 

  December 31, 2017 
(In thousands) 
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest
Income
Recognized
 
With no specific allowance recorded:               
Commercial and industrial $  $  $  $  $ 
Commercial real estate  2,383   2,383      2,429   124 
Construction and land  1,829   1,881      2,041   56 
Residential real estate  581   585      591   22 
Home equity lines of credit  70   70      70   3 
Consumer               
Student               
With an allowance recorded:                    
Commercial and industrial $758  $788  $247  $791  $29 
Commercial real estate  1,248   1,248   257   1,256   58 
Construction and land  3,405   3,433   357   3,451   134 
Residential real estate               
Home equity lines of credit  588   600   51   594   5 
Consumer               
Student               
Total:                    
Commercial and industrial $758  $788  $247  $791  $29 
Commercial real estate  3,631   3,631   257   3,685   182 
Construction and land  5,234   5,314   357   5,492   190 
Residential real estate  581   585      591   22 
Home equity lines of credit  658   670   51   664   8 
Consumer               
Student               
Total $10,862  $10,988  $912  $11,223  $431 

  December 31, 2016 
(In thousands) 
Recorded
Investment
  
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
  
Related
Allowance
  
Average
Recorded
Investment
  
Interest
Income
Recognized
 
With no specific allowance recorded:               
Commercial and industrial $41  $84  $  $72  $5 
Commercial real estate  2,777   2,777      2,837   142 
Construction and land  709   709      716   35 
Residential real estate  410   410      415   17 
Home equity lines of credit  70   70      70   3 
Consumer               
Student               
With an allowance recorded:                    
Commercial and industrial $186  $207  $100  $201  $3 
Commercial real estate  496   496   398   500   24 
Construction and land  2,795   2,825   309   2,793   61 
Residential real estate  1,000   1,000   73   1,006   27 
Home equity lines of credit               
Consumer               
Student               
Total:                    
Commercial and industrial $227  $291  $100  $273  $8 
Commercial real estate  3,273   3,273   398   3,337   166 
Construction and land  3,504   3,534   309   3,509   96 
Residential real estate  1,410   1,410   73   1,421   44 
Home equity lines of credit  70   70      70   3 
Consumer               
Student               
Total $8,484  $8,578  $880  $8,610  $317 

GAAP requires the impairment of loans that have been separately identified for evaluation be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows or, alternatively, the observable market price

Trouble Debt Restructurings

For each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, there were 5 loans or the fair value of the collateral. However, for those loans that are collateral dependent (that is, if repayment of those loans is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral) and for which management has determined foreclosure is probable, the measure of impairment is to be based on the net realizable value of the collateral.


A loan is considered impaired when it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts according to the contractual terms ofin the loan agreement. Factors involvedportfolio, totaling $8.4 million and $2.5 million, respectively, that were identified as TDRs, all of which were current and performing in determining impairment include, but are not limited to, expected future cash flows, financial condition of the borrower, and the current economic conditions. A performing loan may be considered impaired if the factors above indicateaccordance with their modified terms. The following table summarizes a need for impairment. A loan on nonaccrual status may not be impaired if it is in the process of collection or if the shortfall in payment is insignificant. A delay of less than 30 days or a shortfall of less than 5% of the required principal and interest payments generally is considered "insignificant" and would not indicate an impairment  situation, if in management's judgment  the loan will be paid in full. Loansmodification that meet the regulatory definitions of doubtful or loss generally qualify as impaired loans under GAAP. As is the case for all loans, charge-offs for impaired loans occur when the loan or portion of the loan is determined to be uncollectible.

At December 31, 2017, there were $2.4 million of commercial loans, including commercial real estate loans,was classified as substandard whicha TDR during 2020.  There were deemed not to be impaired because the Bank believes all principal and interest are likely to be collected according to the original0 loan agreements and are substandard based on their industry or changes in their cash flow. Impaired loans totaled $10.9 million at December 31, 2017, representing an increase of $2.4 million from the year earlier. Approximately $10.1 million of loansmodifications that were classified as impaired at December 31, 2017 were collateralized by commercial buildings, residential real estate, or land. No additional funds are committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.

No loans were modified as TDRs during the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.2019.  There were no0 payment defaults onfor TDRs occurring within twelve months of modification during the years ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019.

 

 

2020

 

Class of Loan

 

Number of Contracts

 

Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

 

Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment

 

Commercial and industrial

 

1

 

$

6,221

 

 

$

6,221

 


The CARES Act, along with interagency guidance, provided financial institutions the option to temporarily suspend certain accounting requirements related to TDRs with respect to loan modifications, including the deferral of scheduled payments.  As of December 31, 2020, under the current regulatory guidance, 5 loans, totaling $518,000 in principal loan balances, were granted a 90-day deferment of scheduled payments and 1 loan, with a principal balance of $2.6 million was modified.  These 6 loans were not considered TDRs under the current guidance.

62


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2017, there were 10 loans in the portfolio, totaling $5.6 million, that have been identified as TDRs. At December 31, 2017, six of the TDR loans were current2020 and performing in accordance with the modified terms, three TDRs totaling $1.3 million were to a single borrower, in nonaccrual status due to continued irregular payments.


At December 31, 2017,2019, the Company had no0 foreclosed residential real estate propertyproperties in its possession. There was one residential real estate property with a total carrying value of $65,000 that waspossession and NaN in the process of foreclosure.

TDRs on nonaccrual status are included with nonaccrual loans and not with restructured loans.

Note 4.Related Party Transactions

Note 4.Related Party Transactions

Loans outstanding to directors and executive officers and certain of their affiliates totaled $2.3 million and $2.2 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  Loan advances totaled $652,000 and repayments totaled $596,000 in the year ended December 31, 2020.  Total deposits for directors and executive officers and their affiliates were $6.1 million and $5.2 million at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  In the opinion of management, these transactions were made in the ordinary course of business the Company has granted loans to executive officers, directors, their immediate families and affiliated companies in which they are principal shareholders, which totaled $2.9 million and $2.0 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. During 2017, total principal additions were $1.0 million and total principal payments were $200,000. During 2016, total principal additions were $348,000 and total principal payments were $500,000. These loans were made on terms and underwriting standards substantially the same as those offered in comparable transactions to other persons.


The Company accepts deposits of executive officers, directors, their immediate familiesterms and affiliated companies in which they are principal shareholders on the same terms,conditions, including interest rates, collateral and repayment terms, as those prevailing at the same time offor comparable transactions with unrelated persons. The aggregate dollar amount of deposits of executive officerspersons and directors totaled $6.6 million and $4.8 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
do not involve more than normal risk or present other unfavorable features.


Note 5.

Premises and Equipment, Net


A summary of

The following table presents the cost and accumulated depreciation of premises and equipment at December 31, 20172020 and 2016 are as follows:2019.

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Land

 

$

4,246

 

 

$

4,254

 

Buildings and improvements

 

 

22,807

 

 

 

22,709

 

Furniture and equipment

 

 

6,178

 

 

 

6,410

 

Leasehold improvements

 

 

95

 

 

38

 

 

 

 

33,326

 

 

 

33,411

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

 

(16,797

)

 

 

(15,919

)

 

 

$

16,529

 

 

$

17,492

 

(In thousands) 2017  2016 
Land $4,309  $4,185 
Buildings and improvements  22,318   22,050 
Furniture and equipment  5,525   5,554 
Leasehold improvements  38   38 
   32,190   31,827 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization  (13,584)  (12,528)
  $18,606  $19,299 

Depreciation expense totaled $1.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and amortization expense$1.3 for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015 totaled $1.3 million, $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively.


2018.

Note 6.

Deposits


The aggregate amountamounts of time deposits in denominations of $250,000 or more at December 31, 20172020 and 20162019 were $16.0$13.0 million and $13.6$13.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, brokered deposit balances totaled $17.3 million and $15.6 million, respectively.  Brokered deposits include balances of customers who qualify to participate in the Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service and Insured Cash Sweep Service.


Overdraft deposits totaling $164,000$76,000 and $159,000$192,000 were reclassified to loans at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.


At December 31, 2017, the

The following table presents scheduled maturities of time deposits are as follows:at December 31, 2020.

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

2021

 

$

62,932

 

2022

 

 

7,399

 

2023

 

 

3,017

 

2024

 

 

44

 

 

 

$

73,392

 

63


Table of Contents


(In thousands)   
2018 $31,162 
2019  17,590 
2020  12,444 
2021  7,416 
2022  3,303 
and thereafter   
  $71,915 

Note 7.

Employee Benefit Plans


Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

(“SERP”)

The Company has a defined benefit Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”)SERP for certain executives, in which the contribution is solely funded by the Company. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, SERP expenses were $233,000, $270,000 and $256,000, $311,000 and $223,000 respectively. During 2017, distributions from the plan began for one retiring executive.


The following tables provide a reconciliation oftable summarizes the changes inprojected benefit obligations, plan assets, funded status and rate assumptions associated with the SERP’s obligations, in thousands,SERP based upon actuarial valuations, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.2018.

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in Benefit Obligations

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Benefit obligation, beginning

 

$

2,675

 

 

$

2,574

 

 

$

2,485

 

Service cost

 

 

155

 

 

 

169

 

 

 

171

 

Interest cost

 

 

77

 

 

 

100

 

 

 

84

 

Actuarial gain

 

 

158

 

 

 

(20

)

 

 

(18

)

Benefits paid

 

 

(212

)

 

 

(148

)

 

 

(148

)

Benefit obligation, ending

 

$

2,853

 

 

$

2,675

 

 

$

2,574

 

Funded status at December 31,

 

$

(2,853

)

 

$

(2,675

)

 

$

(2,574

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in Plan Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets, beginning

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Employer contributions

 

 

212

 

 

 

148

 

 

 

148

 

Benefits paid

 

 

(212

)

 

 

(148

)

 

 

(148

)

Fair value of plan assets, ending

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

$

-

 

Amounts recognized in the Balance Sheets

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Other assets, deferred income tax benefit

 

$

583

 

 

$

479

 

 

$

513

 

Other liabilities

 

 

2,853

 

 

 

2,675

 

 

 

2,574

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

33

 

 

157

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net gain

 

$

18

 

 

$

176

 

 

$

155

 

Prior service cost

 

23

 

 

22

 

 

22

 

Deferred tax expense

 

 

(8

)

 

 

(41

)

 

 

(37

)

Amount recognized

 

$

33

 

 

$

157

 

 

$

140

 

Changes in benefit obligations 2017  2016  2015 
Projected benefit obligation, beginning $2,531  $2,372  $2,181 
Service cost  164   213   141 
Interest cost  92   97   81 
Actuarial (gain)  (141)  (77)  (31)
Benefits paid  (161)  (74)   
Benefit obligation, ending $2,485  $2,531  $2,372 
Fair value of plan assets, ending $  $  $ 
Funded status at December 31, $(2,485) $(2,531) $(2,372)

Components of net periodic benefit cost

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Service cost

 

$

155

 

 

$

169

 

 

$

171

 

Interest cost

 

77

 

 

100

 

 

84

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Net periodic benefit cost

 

$

233

 

 

$

270

 

 

$

256

 

Amounts recognized on the balance sheets 2017  2016  2015 
Other assets, deferred income tax benefit $542  $861  $806 
Other liabilities  2,485   2,531   2,372 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  125   11   (41)
             
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)            
Net gain (loss) $137  $(4) $(81)
Prior service cost  21   20   19 
Net obligation at transition         
Deferred tax benefit (expense)  (33)  (5)  21 
Amount recognized $125  $11  $(41)
             
Funded status            
Benefit obligation $(2,485) $(2,531) $(2,372)
Fair value of assets         
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss         
Unrecognized net obligation at transition         
Unrecognized prior service cost         
Accrued benefit cost included in other liabilities $(2,485) $(2,531) $(2,372)


Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Net gain

 

$

(158

)

 

$

20

 

 

$

18

 

Amortization of prior service cost

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

1

 

Total recognized

 

 

(157

)

 

 

21

 

 

 

19

 

Less: Income tax effect

 

 

(33

)

 

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

Net amount recognized in other comprehensive income

 

$

(124

)

 

$

17

 

 

$

15

 

Components of net periodic benefit cost 2017  2016  2015 
Service cost $164  $213  $141 
Interest cost  92   97   81 
Expected return on plan assets         
Amortization of prior service cost  1   1   1 
Amortization of net obligation at transition         
Recognized net actuarial loss (gain)         
Net periodic benefit cost $257  $311  $223 

Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) 2017  2016  2015 
Net gain $140  $77  $30 
Prior service cost         
Amortization of prior service cost  1   1   1 
Net obligation at transition         
Amortization of net obligation at transition         
Total recognized  141   78   31 
Less: Income tax effect  27   26   11 
Net amount recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) $114  $52  $20 
Total

The total recognized in thousands, in net periodic benefit costs and other comprehensive (income) lossincome before income tax follows:

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

$

390

 

 

$

249

 

 

$

237

 

64


Table of Contents


Weighted-average assumptions:

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Discount rate used for net periodic benefit cost

 

 

3.00

%

 

 

4.00

%

 

 

3.50

%

Discount rate used for benefit obligation

 

 

2.25

%

 

 

3.00

%

 

 

4.00

%

Rate of compensation increase for net periodic benefit cost and benefit obligation

 

 

3.25

%

 

 

3.25

%

 

 

3.25

%

2017  2016  2015 
$116  $233  $192 

 Weighted-average assumptions 2017  2016  2015 
Discount rate used for net periodic benefit cost  3.75%  4.00%  3.75%
Discount rate used for disclosures  3.50%  3.75%  4.00%
Expected return on plan assets NA  NA  NA 
Rate of compensation increase  3.25%  3.25%  3.25%

Estimated future benefit payments in thousands, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are as follows.follows:

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

For the years ending December 31,

 

Amount

 

2021

 

$

203

 


For the years ending Amount 
December 31, 2018 $148 
December 31, 2019  148 
December 31, 2020  198 
December 31, 2021  202 
December 31, 2022  202 
Thereafter  1,070 

The Company has also established supplemental retirement plans for certain additional executives. The expense for these plans were $33,000was $52,000, $27,100 and $7,000$35,600 during 20172020, 2019 and 2016,2018, respectively.


401(k) Plan

The Company has a defined contribution retirement plan under Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (“Code”) Section 401(k) covering all employees who are at least 18 years of age.age and worked more than 20 hours per week. Under the plan, a participant may contribute an amount up to 100% of their covered compensation for the year, not to exceed the dollar limit set by law (Code Section 402(g)). The Company will make an annual matching contribution, equal to 100% on the first 6% of compensation deferred for a maximum match of 6% of compensation. The Company makes an additional safe harbor contribution equal to 3% of compensation to all eligible participants. The Company’s 401(k) expenses for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 were $685,000, $685,000$788,000, $747,000 and $715,000,$688,000, respectively.


Deferred Compensation Plans

The Company maintains a Director Deferred Compensation Plan (“Deferred Compensation Plan”).Plan. This plan provides that any non-employeenonemployee director of the Company may elect to defer receipt of all or any portion of his or her compensation as a director. A participating director may elect to have amounts deferred under the Deferred Compensation Plan held in a deferred cash account, which is credited on a quarterly basis with interest equal to the highest rate offered by the Bank at the end of the preceding quarter. Alternatively, a participant may elect to have a deferred stock account in which deferred amounts are treated as if invested in the Company’s common stock at the fair market value on the date of deferral. The value of a stock account will increase and decreasechange based upon the fair market value of an equivalent number of shares of common stock. In addition, the deferred amounts deemed invested in common stock will be credited with dividends on an equivalent number of shares. Amounts considered invested in the Company’s common stock are paid, at the election of the director, either in cash or in whole shares of the common stock and cash in lieu of fractional shares. Directors may elect to receive amounts contributed to their respective accounts in one1 or up to five5 installments. There were no0 directors participating in the Director Deferred Compensation Plan in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015.


2018.

The Company has a nonqualified deferred compensation program for a former key employee’s retirement, in which the contribution expense is solely funded by the Company. The retirement benefit to be provided is variable based upon the performance of underlying life insurance policy assets. Deferred compensation expense amounted to $22,000, $16,000$28,000, $77,000 and $45,000$44,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Concurrent with the establishment of the deferred compensation program, the Company purchased life insurance policies on this employee with the Company named as owner and beneficiary. These life insurance policies are intended to be utilized as a source of funding the deferred compensation program. TheAt December 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company has recorded on the consolidated balance sheets, $1.3$1.4 million in cash surrender value for these policies as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015,$155,000 and $93,000, $103,000 and $121,000$153,000 in accrued liabilities as of December 31, 2017, 20162020 and 2015.2019, respectively.  The Company has recorded on the consolidated statements of operations, noninterest income of $29,000, for the year ended December 31, 2020 and $28,000 $25,000 and $32,000 for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015, respectively.


Note 8.Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

Note 8.Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

In 2004, the Company implemented a dividend reinvestment and stock purchase plan (the “DRSPP”) that allows participating shareholders to purchase additional shares of the Company’s common stock through automatic reinvestment of dividends or optional cash investments at 100% of the market price of the common stock, which is either the actual purchase price of the shares if obtained on the open market, or the average of the closing bid and asked quotations for a share of common stock on the day before the purchase date for shares, if acquired directly from the Company, as newly issued shares under the DRSPP. There were no0 new shares issued during 2017, 20162020 and 2015.2019. The Company had 236,529 shares available for issuance under the DRSPP at December 31, 2017.


2020.

Note 9.Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

Note 9.Commitments and Contingent Liabilities

The Bank has entered into three banking facility leases of greater than one year.  Total rent expense was $679,000, $676,000 and $690,000 for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and was included in occupancy expense.


The Bank has two2 data processing contractual obligations of greater than one year.that began in June 2014 and will end in December 2021.  The expense for the Bank’s largest primary contractual obligation is for core data processing, andthese obligations totaled $1.1$1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and $1.2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019 and 2015.2018.  In addition, tothe core data processing this contract provides for interchange processing where the expense is based on interchange volume. The interchange expense for 2017, 2016volume and 2015 was $739,000, $831,000 and $716,000, respectively, and wasis more than offset by interchange income on the same transactions.transactions.  The termnet interchange income was $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and $1.3 million for each of the current data processing obligation began in June 2014years ended December 31, 2019 and will end in December 2021, and is included in data processing expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The following is a schedule by year of future minimum lease requirements and contractual obligations required under the long-term non-cancellable agreements:

(In thousands) Amount 
2018 $2,905 
2019  3,002 
2020  3,097 
2021  3,180 
2022  3,265 
Thereafter  4,326 
Total $19,775 

As a member2018.

In accordance with Regulation D of the Federal Reserve System,Act, the Bank is typically required to maintain certain averagecash reserve balances.balances on hand or with the Federal Reserve Bank.  In March 2020, the Federal Reserve Bank eliminated the reserve requirement.  For the final weekly reporting period for the yearsyear ended December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the aggregate amounts of daily averageBank had 0 required balances were approximately $23.8 million and $22.8 million, respectively.


reserve balances.  

In the normal course of business, there arethe Company makes various outstanding commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities, such as guarantees, commitments to extend credit, etc., which are not reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements. These commitments and contingent liabilities include various guarantees, commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. The Company does not anticipate any material losses as a material impact on its financial statements.result of these commitments.  See Note 15 with respect to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk.


Note 10.

Income Taxes


The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and the Commonwealth of Virginia.


On December 22, 2017,

The following table summarizes the Tax Act was signed into law. Among other things, the Tax Act permanently reduced the corporate tax rate to 21% from the prior maximum rate of 35%, effective for tax years including or commencing January 1, 2018. As a result of the reduction of the corporate tax rate to 21%, companies were required to revalue their deferred tax assets and liabilities as of the date of enactment, with resulting tax effects accounted for in the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company continues to evaluate the impact on its 2017 tax expense of the revaluation required by the lower corporate tax rate implemented by the Tax Act, which management has estimated to be $1.7 million. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company recorded $1.7 million in additional tax expense based on the Company's preliminary analysis of the impact of the Tax Act. The Company's preliminary estimate of the impact of the Tax Act is based on currently available information and interpretation of its provisions. The actual results may differ from the current estimate due to, among other things, further guidance that may be issued by U.S. tax authorities or regulatory bodies and/or changes in interpretations and assumptions that the Company has preliminarily made. The Company's evaluation of the impact of the Tax Act is subject to refinement for up to one year after enactment per the guidance under Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 740, Income Taxes, and Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118.


The components of the net deferred tax assets included in other assets at December 31, 20172020 and 2016 are as follows:2019.

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for loan losses

 

$

1,443

 

 

$

1,098

 

Interest on nonaccrual loans

 

71

 

 

40

 

Accrued vacation

 

98

 

 

76

 

SERP obligation

 

583

 

 

479

 

OREO

 

219

 

 

219

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

139

 

 

97

 

Restricted stock

 

64

 

 

108

 

Other

 

327

 

 

254

 

 

 

 

2,944

 

 

 

2,371

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Securities available for sale

 

703

 

 

344

 

Other

 

20

 

 

11

 

 

 

723

 

 

355

 

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

2,221

 

 

$

2,016

 


(In thousands) 2017  2016 
Deferred tax assets:      
Allowance for loan losses $1,070  $1,539 
Securities available for sale  9   393 
Impairment on securities  317   513 
Interest on nonaccrual loans  166   276 
Accrued vacation  75   121 
SERP obligation  542   892 
OREO  219   355 
Accumulated depreciation  53    
Restricted stock  58   93 
Other  201   282 
   2,710   4,464 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Accumulated depreciation     5 
Other  14   8 
   14   13 
Net deferred tax assets $2,696  $4,451 

The Company has not recorded a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets as management feels it is more likely than not,more-likely-than-not that they will be ultimately realized.


  Year Ended December 31, 
(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Current tax expense $1,523  $708  $(232)
Deferred taxes  1,356   229   (1,192)
  $2,879  $937  $(1,424)

The reasons for the difference between the statutory federalContents

Components of income tax rate and the effectiveexpense is summarized below:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Current tax expense

 

$

1,554

 

 

$

880

 

 

$

525

 

Deferred taxes

 

 

(487

)

 

 

124

 

 

 

221

 

 

 

$

1,067

 

 

$

1,004

 

 

$

746

 

Income tax ratesexpense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015 are summarized as follows:2018 differed from the federal statutory rate applied to income before income taxes for the following reasons:

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Computed “expected” tax expense

 

$

1,458

 

 

$

1,643

 

 

$

1,445

 

Changes in income taxes resulting from:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tax-exempt interest income

 

 

(160

)

 

 

(146

)

 

 

(149

)

Tax credits

 

 

(479

)

 

 

(552

)

 

 

(504

)

Other

 

 

248

 

 

 

59

 

 

 

(46

)

 

 

$

1,067

 

 

$

1,004

 

 

$

746

 

(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Computed “expected” tax expense (benefit) $1,828  $1,568  $(692)
Impact of the Tax Act  1,687       
Decrease in income taxes resulting from:            
Tax-exempt interest income  (254)  (242)  (407)
Tax credits  (422)  (402)  (338)
Other  40   13   13 
  $2,879  $937  $(1,424)

Note 11.Earnings Per Share

Note 11.Earnings Per Share

The following table showspresents the weighted average number of shares used in computing earnings per share and the effect on weighted average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock.

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Per Share Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Per Share Amount

 

 

Shares

 

 

Per Share Amount

 

Basic earnings per share

 

 

3,793,366

 

 

$

1.55

 

 

 

3,783,322

 

 

$

1.80

 

 

 

3,772,421

 

 

$

1.63

 

Effect of dilutive stock awards

 

 

5,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,396

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,945

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted earnings per share

 

 

3,798,816

 

 

$

1.55

 

 

 

3,790,718

 

 

$

1.80

 

 

 

3,779,366

 

 

$

1.62

 


  2017  2016  2015 
  Shares  
Per Share
Amount
  Shares  
Per Share
Amount
  Shares  
Per Share
Amount
 
                   
Basic earnings per share  3,764,690  $0.66   3,753,757  $0.98   3,742,725  $$(0.16)
Effect of dilutive stock awards  8,320       10,172            
Diluted earnings per share  3,773,010  $0.66   3,763,929  $0.98   3,742,725  $$(0.16)
Non-vested

Unvested restricted shares have voting rights and receive non-forfeitablenonforfeitable dividends during the vesting period; therefore, they are included in calculating basic earnings per share. The portion of non-vestedunvested performance-based restricted stock awardsunits that are expected to vest, but have not yet been awarded, are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.


Note 12.

Stock Based

Share-based Compensation


Stock Incentive Plan

On May 19, 2009,21, 2019, the shareholders of the Company approved the Company’sFauquier Bankshares, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which superseded and replaced the Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan.


.  Under the Plan, awards of options, restricted stock, options, stock appreciation rights, non-vested and/or restricted shares, and long-term performance unitother stock-based awards may be granted to employees, directors and certain employees for purchaseor consultants of the Company’s common stock.Company or any affiliate.  The effective date of the Plan is March 19, 2009,was May 21, 2019 and the date the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Plan, and it has a termination date of December 31, 2019.is May 21, 2029. The Company’s Board of Directors may terminate, suspend or modify the Plan within certain restrictions.  The Plan authorizes for issuance 350,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Plan requires that options be granted at an exercise price equal to at least 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant. Such options are generally not exercisable until three years from the date of issuance and generally require continuous employment during the period prior to exercise. The options will expire in no more than ten years after the date of grant. The stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, and long-term performance unit awards for certain employees are generally subject to vesting requirements and are subject to forfeiture if vesting and other contractual provision requirements are not met. The Company did not grant stock options during 2017, 2016 or 2015 and at December 31, 2017, there were none outstanding.

Restricted Shares

The restricted

Restricted shares are accounted for using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date the restrictedin which these shares were awarded. The restrictedRestricted shares are issued to certain executive officers and are subject to a vesting period, whereby, the restrictions on the shares lapse on the third year anniversary of the date the restricted shares were awarded. Compensation expense for these shares is recognized over the three yearthree-year period. The restricted shares issued to non-employeenonemployee directors are not subject to a vesting period and compensation expense is recognized at the date the shares are granted.


The Company granted awards of non-vested shares to certain officers and vested shares to non-employee directors under the Plan: 10,525 shares, 14,673 shares and 10,227 shares of non-vested restricted stock to executive officers; and 5,139 shares, 4,536 shares and 3,458 shares of vested restricted stock to non-employee directors for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.  Compensation expense for these non-vestedrestricted shares amounted to $79,000, $169,000$344,000, $243,000 and $163,000,$223,000, net of forfeiture, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there was $135,000$78,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted underrestricted shares. This amount is expected to be recognized through 2023, however the Company's equity compensation plans. This typeacceleration of deferred compensation costthis expense is recognized overexpected as a period of three years. Compensation expense for non-employee director shares was $90,000 in 2017, $68,000 in 2016 and $59,000 in 2015 and was recognized at the date the shares were granted.

A summaryresult of the statuscompletion of the Merger.

67


Table of Contents

The table below summarizes the Company’s non-vestedunvested restricted shares granted under the above-described plans is presented below:shares.

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Per Share

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Per Share

 

Unvested shares, beginning

 

 

20,352

 

 

$

20.20

 

 

 

22,569

 

 

$

18.08

 

Granted

 

 

12,182

 

 

 

20.95

 

 

 

12,058

 

 

 

21.69

 

Vested

 

 

(21,906

)

 

 

20.27

 

 

 

(12,105

)

 

 

21.20

 

Forfeited or surrendered

 

 

(2,007

)

 

 

19.21

 

 

 

(2,170

)

 

 

20.46

 

Unvested shares, ending

 

 

8,621

 

 

$

21.31

 

 

 

20,352

 

 

$

20.20

 


  2017 
  Shares  
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Non-vested at January 1,  18,045    
Granted  15,664  $17.50 
Vested  (9,123)    
Forfeited  (6,524)    
Non-vested at December 31,  18,062     

Performance-Based

Performance-based Restricted Stock Rights

Units

The Company grantedgrants performance-based restricted stock rights relating to 10,525 shares, 14,382 shares and 10,227 sharesunits to certain officers in the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, under the Plan. The performance-basedexecutive officers.  Performance-based restricted stock rightsunits are accounted for using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date awarded, and adjusted as the market value of the stock changes.  The performance-basedPerformance-based restricted stock rights sharesunits issued to executive officers are subject to a vesting period, whereby the restrictions on the sharesrights lapse on the third year anniversary of the date the restricted stock rightsunits were awarded. Until vesting, the shares underlying the units are not issued and are not included in shares outstanding.  The awards are subject toVesting is contingent upon the Company reaching a predetermined three year performance average on the return on average equity ratio, alsogoals as compared towith a predetermined peer group of banks. The compensationCompensation expense for performance-based restricted stock rightsunits totaled $48,000, $42,000$74,000, $97,000 and $(148,000)$80,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. In the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, previously accrued compensation expense of $7,000 and $206,000 respectively, for performance-based stock rights was recovered because the predetermined metrics were not attained. As of December 31, 2017,2020, there was $86,000$37,000 unrecognized compensation costexpense related to these performance-based restricted stock rights.units. This typeexpense is expected to be recognized through 2023, however the acceleration of deferred compensation costthis expense is recognized over a period of three years dependent upon management reachingexpected in connection with the predetermined goals.   


A summarycompletion of the status ofMerger.   

The table below summarizes the Company’s non-vestedunvested performance-based stock rights is presented below:units.

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

 

 

Shares

 

 

Weighted Average Fair Value

Per Share

 

 

Performance Based Stock Rights

 

 

Weighted Average Fair Value

Per Share

 

Unvested shares, beginning

 

 

30,012

 

 

$

18.90

 

 

 

22,103

 

 

$

17.90

 

Granted

 

 

7,889

 

 

 

20.95

 

 

 

7,909

 

 

 

21.69

 

Vested

 

 

(4,662

)

 

 

21.02

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Forfeited

 

 

(15,534

)

 

 

18.00

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Unvested shares, ending

 

 

17,705

 

 

$

20.05

 

 

 

30,012

 

 

$

18.90

 


  2017 
  
Performance
Based Stock Rights
(Shares)
  
Weighted Average
Fair Value
 
Non-vested at January 1,  18,045     
Granted  10,525     
Vested       
Forfeited  (10,508)    
Non-vested at December 31,  18,062  $16.58 

Note 13.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances and Other Borrowings


The Company’s borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) were $7.9$12.6 million and $16.7 million at December 31, 20172020 and $12.9 million at December 31, 2016.2019, respectively. At December 31, 2017 and 2016,2020, the fixed interest rates on FHLB advances ranged fromwere 2.06% to 2.82%, respectively, and the weighted average interest rate at December 31, 2020 and 2019 was 2.54%2.06% and 2.46%2.21%, respectively.


At December 31, 2017,2020, the Bank had anBank’s available line of credit with the FHLB with a borrowing limit ofwas approximately $189.2 million with advances of $7.9 million outstanding. The amount outstanding includes $2.9 million of amortizing balances that will mature with a balloon of $2.4 million in 2022.$109.1 million.  FHLB advances and the available line of credit were secured by certain first and second lien loans on 1-to-41-4 family single unit single-family dwellings and eligible commercial real estate loans of the Bank. As of December 31, 2017, the book value of eligible loans totaled approximately $185.2 million. At December 31, 2016, the advances were secured by similar loans totaling $161.4 million. The amount of available credit is limited to 100% of the market value of qualifying collateral for 1-to-41-4 family single unit single-family residential loans, 68% to 84% for home equity loans and 70% for commercial real estate loans. Any borrowing in excess of the qualifying collateral requires pledging of additional assets.


The following table presents the contractual maturities of FHLB advances in thousands, at December 31, 2017 are as follows:2020:

(In thousands)

 

 

 

 

2022

 

$

2,606

 

2024

 

 

10,000

 

 

 

$

12,606

 


Due in 2018 $80 
Due in 2019  85 
Due in 2020  89 
Due in 2021  95 
Due in 2022  7,511 
Thereafter   
  $7,860 

As additional sources

68


Table of liquidity,Contents

At December 31, 2020, the Bank has available$96.0 million in federal funds purchased lines of credit with sevenseveral different commercial banks totaling $60.0and $22.6 million andavailable from the Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondRichmond. As of December 31, 2020, the Bank also had a letter of credit in the amount of $35.0 million with the FHLB issued as collateral for $2.3 million.public fund depository accounts.  At December 31, 2017, none2020, NaN of the available federal funds purchased lines of credit with various commercial banksor letter of credit were in use.


Note 14.

Dividend Limitations on Affiliate Bank


Transfers of funds from the Bank to the Company in the form of loans, advances and cash dividends are restricted by federal and state regulatory authorities. As of December 31, 2017,2020, the aggregate amount of unrestricted funds, which could be transferred from the Bank to the Company, without prior regulatory approval, totaled $2.3$13.7 million.


Note 15.

Financial Instruments Withwith Off-Balance Sheet Risk


The Company is party to credit-relatedcredit related financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Such commitments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.


The Company’s exposure to credit loss is represented by the contractual amount of these commitments. The Company follows the same credit policies in making commitments as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.


At December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the following financial instruments were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Commitments to extend credit

 

$

112,712

 

 

$

91,564

 

Standby letters of credit

 

 

5,466

 

 

 

4,892

 

 

 

$

118,178

 

 

$

96,456

 


(In thousands) 2017  2016 
Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:      
Commitments to extend credit $88,123  $52,380 
Standby letters of credit  3,438   3,983 
  $91,561  $56,363 

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long asprovided that there isare no violationviolations of any condition established in the contract.terms of the contract prior to funding. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.fee by the customer. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer'scustomer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company, is based on management's credit evaluation of the customer.


Unfunded commitments under commercial lines of credit, revolving credit lines and overdraft protection agreements are commitments for possible future extensions of credit to existing customers. These lines of credit usually do not contain a specified maturity date and may not be drawn upon to the total extent to which the Company is committed.


Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third-party. Those letters of credit are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements.  The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Company generally holds collateral supporting those commitments if deemed necessary.


Note 16.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities


GAAP requires that all derivatives be recognized in the consolidated financial statements at their fair values. On the date that the derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the derivative as a hedge of variable cash flows to be paid or received in conjunction with recognized assets or liabilities as a cash flow or fair value hedge. For a derivative treated as a cash flow hedge, the ineffective portion of changes in fair value is reported in current period earnings. The effective portion of the cash flow hedge is recorded as an adjustment to the hedged item through other comprehensive income (loss). For a derivative treated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss on the derivative as well as the offsetting gain or loss on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in current earnings.

The Company uses interest rate swaps to reduce interest rate risk and to manage net interest income.  There was no cash flow hedge ineffectiveness identified during 2017, 2016 and 2015.


The Company formally assesses, both at the hedges’ inception, and on an on-going basis, whether derivatives used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives are expected to remain highly effective in subsequent periods. The Company discontinues hedge accounting when (a) it determines that a derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of a hedged item; (b) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (c) probability exists that the forecasted transaction will no longer occur; or (d) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. In all cases in which hedge accounting is discontinued and a derivative remains outstanding, the Company will carry the derivative at fair value in the consolidated financial statements, recognizing changes in fair value in current period income in the consolidated statements of operations.

Interest differentials paid or received under the swap agreements are reflected as adjustments to interest income. These interest rate swap agreements include both cash flow and fair value hedge derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting. The notional amounts of the interest rate swaps are not exchanged and do not represent exposure to credit loss. In the event of default by a counter party, the risk in these transactions is the cost of replacing the agreements at current market rates.

The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement on July 1, 2010 to manage the interest rate exposure on its Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest DebenturesDebt due 2036.  By entering into this agreement, the Company convertsconverted a floating rate liability into a fixed rate liability through the maturity date of September 15, 2020. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company receives interest quarterly at the rate equivalent to three-month LIBOR plus 1.70% repricing every three months on the same date as the Company’s Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2036Debt and pays interest expense monthly at the fixed rate of 4.91%3.21%. The interest expense on the interest rate swap was $82,000, $103,000 and $118,000 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and  2015, respectively.  In addition, on June 24, 2016, the Company entered into a forward interest rate swap agreement to convert the floating rate liability on the same Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable DebenturesDebt to fixed from 2020 to 2031.  Interest expense on these interest rate swaps was $87,000, $31,000 and $43,000 for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. There was no interest expense recognized on the forward interest rate swap in 2017,0 cash flow hedge ineffectiveness identified during 2020, 2019 and there will be no exchange of payments until 2020. Both of these2018.  These swaps are designated as cash flow hedges and changes in the fair value are recorded as an adjustment through other comprehensive income.


The Company entered into two2 swap agreements to manage the interest rate risk related to two2 commercial loans.loans on February 11, 2015 and April 7, 2015. The agreements allow the Company to convert fixed rate assets to floating rate assets through 2022 and 2025. The Company receives interest monthly at the rate equivalent to one-month LIBOR plus a spread repricing on the same date as the loans and pays interest at fixed rates. The interestInterest expense recognized on the interest rate swaps was $47,000, $89,000$54,000 for the year ended December 31, 2020 and $161,000 in 2017, 2016interest income of $26,000 and 2015, respectively,$5,000 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and is recorded in loan interest income.2018. These swaps are designated as fair value hedges and changes in fair value are recorded in current earnings.

  On July 28, 2020, 1 of these swap agreements with a notional/contract amount of $1.2 million terminated, resulting in a termination fee of $89,200.

Cash collateral held at other banks for these swaps was $1.2$1.1 million and $730,000 at December 31, 20172020 and 2016.2019, respectively. Collateral posted and received is dependent on the market valuation of the underlying hedges.


The gains on cash flow hedges included in other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, were $14,000 and $207,000follow table summarizes the Company’s derivative instruments as of December 31, 20172020 and 2016, respectively.  The gains (losses) on fair value hedges included in interest income were $12,000 and $(12,000) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2019:

(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

 

Notional/Contract Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Fair Value

Balance Sheet Location

 

Expiration Date

Interest rate forward swap - cash flow

 

$

4,000

 

 

$

(442

)

 

Other Liabilities

 

6/15/2031

Interest rate swap - fair value

 

 

4,150

 

 

 

(76

)

 

Other Liabilities

 

2/12/2022


(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2019

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

 

Notional/Contract Amount

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Fair Value

Balance Sheet Location

 

Expiration Date

Interest rate swap - cash flow

 

$

4,000

 

 

$

(41

)

 

Other Liabilities

 

9/15/2020

Interest rate forward swap - cash flow

 

 

4,000

 

 

 

(59

)

 

Other Liabilities

 

6/15/2031

Interest rate swap - fair value

 

 

1,167

 

 

 

(17

)

 

Other Liabilities

 

4/9/2025

Interest rate swap - fair value

 

 

4,230

 

 

 

(23

)

 

Other Liabilities

 

2/12/2022

The effects of derivative instruments on the consolidated financial statements for December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
(In thousands) December 31, 2017
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments 
Notional/
Contract Amount
  
Estimated Net
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Balance Sheet Location
 Expiration Date
Interest rate swap - cash flow $4,000  $(119)Other Liabilities 9/15/2020
Interest rate forward swap - cash flow  4,000   164 Other Assets 6/15/2031
Interest rate swap - fair value  1,219   20 Other Assets 4/9/2025
Interest rate swap - fair value  4,475   49 Other Assets 2/12/2022
(In thousands) December 31, 2016
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments 
Notional/
Contract Amount
  
Estimated Net
Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Balance Sheet Location
 Expiration Date
Interest rate swap - cash flow $4,000  $(214)Other Liabilities 9/15/2020
Interest rate swap forward - cash flow  4,000   238 Other Assets 6/15/2031
Interest rate swap - fair value  1,251   12 Other Assets 4/9/2025
Interest rate swap - fair value  4,598,000   (2,000)Other Liabilities 2/12/2022

Note 17.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Note 17.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents information on changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, for the periods indicated.(1)

(In thousands)

 

Gains (Losses) on Cash Flow Hedges

 

 

Unrealized Gains (Losses) on Available for Sale Securities

 

 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans

 

 

Total

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

$

37

 

 

$

(37

)

 

$

125

 

 

$

125

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassification of the income tax effect of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

-

 

 

 

10

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

10

 

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

 

 

135

 

 

 

(823

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

(673

)

Balance, December 31, 2018

 

$

172

 

 

$

(850

)

 

$

140

 

 

$

(538

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

(250

)

 

 

2,142

 

 

 

17

 

 

 

1,909

 

Balance, December 31, 2019

 

$

(78

)

 

$

1,292

 

 

$

157

 

 

$

1,371

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

(271

)

 

 

1,349

 

 

 

(124

)

 

 

954

 

Balance, December 31, 2020

 

$

(349

)

 

$

2,641

 

 

$

33

 

 

$

2,325

 


 (In thousands) 
Gains and Losses on
Cash Flow Hedges
  
Unrealized Gains and
Losses on Available
for Sale Securities
  
Supplemental
Executive
Retirement Plans
  Total 
Balance December 31, 2014 $(200) $160  $(61) $(101)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications  10   (386)  20   (356)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss)     (3)     (3)
Net current-period other comprehensive income  10   (389)  20   (359)
Balance December 31, 2015 $(190) $(229) $(41) $(460)
                 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications  207   (536)  52   (277)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss)            
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)  207   (536)  52   (277)
Balance December 31, 2016 $17  $(765) $11  $(737)
                 
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications  20   728   114   862 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss)            
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)  20   728   114   862 
Balance, December 31, 2017 $37  $(37) $125  $125 

(1)All amounts are net of tax.

Note 18.Fair Value Measurements

The

Note 18.Fair Value Measurements

GAAP requires the Company follows GAAP to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. GAAP clarifies thatliabilities. The fair value of certain assets and liabilities is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants.


participants as of the measurement date.

GAAP specifies a hierarchy ofrequires that valuation techniques based on whethermaximize the use of observable inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, whileand minimize the use of unobservable inputs reflect the Company’s market assumptions. The three levels of theinputs.  GAAP also establishes a fair value hierarchy under GAAP basedwhich prioritizes the valuation inputs into three broad levels. Based on these two typesthe underlying inputs, each fair value measurement in its entirety is reported in one of inputsthe three levels. These levels are:

          Level 1:Inputs are defined as follows:


Level 1 — Valuation is based on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets andor liabilities.

          Level 2:

Inputs are defined as inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.  


Level 2 — Valuation is based on observable3:Inputs are defined as unobservable inputs including quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identicalthe asset or similar assets and liabilities in less active markets, and model-based valuation techniques for which significant assumptions can be derived primarily from or corroborated by observable data in the market.

Level 3 — Valuation is based on model-based techniques that use one or more significant inputs or assumptions that are unobservable in the market.

liability.  

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to measure certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis in the consolidated financial statements:


Securities available for sale: Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.  Fair value measurement is based upon quoted market prices, when available (Level 1). If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are measured utilizing independent valuation techniques of identical or similar securities for which significant assumptions are derived primarily from or corroborated by observable market data (Level 2). If the inputs used to provide the evaluation for certain securities are unobservable and/or there is little, if any, market activity, then the security would fall to the lowest level of the hierarchy (Level 3). The Company’s investment portfolio is primarily valued using fair value measurements that are considered to be Level 2. The Company has contracted with a third-party for valuation of its securities. The vendor’s primary source for security valuation isan independent pricing service that uses Interactive Data Corporation (“IDC”), which evaluates securities based on market data. as the primary source for valuation.  IDC utilizes evaluated pricing models that vary by asset class and include available trade, bid, and other market information.  Generally, the methodology includes broker quotes, proprietary modes,models, vast descriptive terms and conditions databases, as well as extensive quality control programs.


71


Table of Contents

Interest rate swaps: Interest  The Company recognizes interest rate swaps are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements as part of the management of interest rate risk to modify the repricing characteristics of certain portions of the Company’s interest-bearing assets and liabilities.value.  The Company has contracted with a third-party to provide valuations for interest rate swaps using standard swap valuation techniques and therefore classifies such valuationstechniques.  The Company’s interest rate swaps are classified as Level 2. The Company has considered counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap assets and has considered its own credit risk in the valuation of its interest rate swap liabilities.


The following table presents the balances of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017basis:

 

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Assets at December 31, 2020:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies

 

$

59,210

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

59,210

 

 

$

0

 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

23,638

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

23,638

 

 

 

0

 

Total available for sale securities

 

 

82,848

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

82,848

 

 

 

0

 

Mutual funds

 

 

419

 

 

 

419

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

83,267

 

 

$

419

 

 

$

82,848

 

 

$

0

 

Liabilities at December 31, 2020:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

518

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

518

 

 

$

0

 

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

518

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

518

 

 

$

0

 

Assets at December 31, 2019:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies

 

$

63,941

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

63,941

 

 

$

0

 

Obligations of states and political subdivisions

 

 

15,842

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

15,842

 

 

 

0

 

Total available for sale securities

 

 

79,783

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

79,783

 

 

 

0

 

Mutual funds

 

 

403

 

 

 

403

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

Total assets at fair value

 

$

80,186

 

 

$

403

 

 

$

79,783

 

 

$

0

 

Liabilities at December 31, 2019:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

140

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

140

 

 

$

0

 

Total liabilities at fair value

 

$

140

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

140

 

 

$

0

 

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure and December 31, 2016 by levels within the valuation hierarchy:


  Fair Value Measurements 
(In thousands) Balance  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Assets at December 31, 2017            
Available for sale securities:            
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $52,377  $  $52,377  $ 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions  15,255      15,255    
Corporate bonds  4,139      4,139    
Mutual funds  382   382       
Total available for sale securities  72,153   382   71,771    
Interest rate swaps  233      233    
Total assets at fair value $72,386  $382  $72,004  $ 
                 
Liabilities at December 31, 2017                
Interest rate swaps $119  $  $119  $ 
Total liabilities at fair value $119  $  $119  $ 
                 
Assets at December 31, 2016                
Available for sale securities:                
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $40,504  $  $40,504  $ 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions  6,310      6,310    
Corporate bonds  2,785         2,785 
Mutual funds  374   374       
Total available for sale securities  49,973   374   46,814   2,785 
Interest rate swaps  250      250    
Total assets at fair value $50,223  $374  $47,064  $2,785 
                 
Liabilities at December 31, 2016                
Interest rate swaps $216  $  $216  $ 
Total liabilities at fair value $216  $  $216  $ 

Change in Level 3 Fair Value

  Total Gains (Losses) Realized/Unrealized 
(In thousands) 
Balance
January 1, 2017
  
Net
Income
  
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
  
Transfers
in (out) of
Level 3
  
Balance
December 31, 2017
 
Corporate bonds $2,785  $73  $1,281  $(4,139) $ 

Certainrecognize certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques and inputs used by the Company to measurein determining the fair value of certain financial assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the consolidated financial statements:

statements.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale:  Mortgage loans held for sale are carried at lower of cost or market value. These loans currently consist of 1-4 family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). NaN nonrecurring fair value adjustments were recorded on mortgage loans held for sale during 2020 and 2019. Net gains and losses on the sale of loans are recorded as a component of noninterest income on the consolidated statements of operations.

Impaired Loans: Loans are  A loan is designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loanloans or the fair value of the collateral securing the loans, or the present value of the cash flows. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The vast majority of the Company’s collateral is real estate.  The value of real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal of one year or less, conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is more than one year oldone-year-old and not solely based on observable market comparables or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal of one year or less, if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3).  Impaired loans allocated to the allowance for loan losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the consolidated statements of operations.       At December 31, 2017, the Company’s Level 3 loans for which a reserve has been taken, consisted of one loan totaling $312,000 secured by real estate with reserves of $312,000 and three loans totaling $140,000 secured with business assets and inventory with reserves of $94,000.  

Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”): Owned:OREO is measured at fair value less estimated selling costs.  Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral, or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. The Company considers OREO as nonrecurring Level 3. Total valuation of OREO property was $1.4 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016.


The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the period:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

$

375

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

375

 

 

$

0

 

Impaired loans, net

 

 

1,220

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,220

 

Other real estate owned, net

 

 

1,356

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,356

 


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

 

Balance

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

$

247

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

247

 

 

$

0

 

Impaired loans, net

 

 

1,570

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,570

 

Other real estate owned, net

 

 

1,356

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,356

 

  December 31, 2017 
(In thousands) 
Balance as of
December 31, 2017
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Assets:            
Impaired loans, net $5,087  $  $5,041  $46 
Other real estate owned, net  1,356         1,356 

  December 31, 2016 
(In thousands) 
Balance as of
December 31, 2016
  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Assets:            
Impaired loans, net $3,597  $  $3,509  $88 
Other real estate owned, net  1,356         1,356 

The following table displays quantitative information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements forfair value measurements at December 31, 20172020 and 2016:2019:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Fair Value

 

 

Valuation Technique

 

Unobservable Input

 

Weighted Average Discount

 

Impaired loans, net

 

$

1,220

 

 

Appraised values

 

Age of appraisals, current market conditions, and experience within local market

 

 

5

%

Other real estate owned, net

 

 

1,356

 

 

Appraised values

 

Age of appraisal, current market conditions and selling costs

 

 

18

%

Total

 

$

2,576

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

December 31, 2019

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

Fair Value

 

 

Valuation Technique

 

Unobservable Input

 

Weighted Average Discount

 

Impaired loans, net

 

$

1,570

 

 

Appraised values

 

Age of appraisal, current market conditions, and experience within local market

 

 

13

%

Other real estate owned, net

 

 

1,356

 

 

Appraised values

 

Age of appraisal, current market conditions and selling costs

 

 

18

%

Total

 

$

2,926

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  December 31, 2017 
(In thousands) 
Fair
Value
 
Valuation
Technique(s)
 Unobservable Input 
Weighted
Average
 
Impaired Loans $46  Appraised values 
Age of appraisal, current market conditions,
experience within local market, and U.S. Government guarantees
  90%
Other real estate owned, net  1,356 Appraised values Age of appraisal, current market conditions and selling costs  18%
Total $1,402        

  December 31, 2016 
(In thousands) 
Fair
Value
 
Valuation
Technique(s)
 Unobservable Input 
Weighted
Average
 
Corporate bonds $2,785 Market values Discounted cash flow  0%
Impaired Loans  88 Appraised values 
Age of appraisal, current market conditions,
experience within local market, and U.S. Government guarantees
  81%
Other real estate owned, net  1,356 Appraised values Age of appraisal, current market conditions and selling costs  18%
Total $4,229        
The

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 825, “Financial Instruments”, requires disclosure about fair value of a financial instrument is the current amountinstruments, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that would be exchanged between willing parties, other than in a forced liquidation.  Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted market prices for the Company’s various financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount raterequired to be measured and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, thereported at fair value estimates may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instruments. GAAPon a recurring or nonrecurring basis. ASC 825 excludes certain financial instruments and all non-financialnonfinancial instruments from its disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented may not necessarily represent the underlying fair value of the Company.


The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate Additionally, the Company uses the exit price notion, rather than the entry price notion, in calculating the fair value of each classvalues of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:

Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts of cash and short-term instruments with a maturity of three months or less approximate fair value. Instruments with maturities of greater than three months are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on similar instruments.

Securities: For securities and marketable equity securities held for investment purposes, fair values are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. For other securities held as investments,not measured at fair value equals quoted market price, if available. Ifon a quoted market price is not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices for similar securities. See Note 2 “Securities” for further discussion on determining fair value for pooled trust preferred securities.

Loans Receivable: For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for certain mortgage loans (e.g., 1-to-4 family residential), credit card loans, and other consumer loans are based on quoted market prices of similar loans sold in conjunction with securitization transactions, adjusted for differences in loan characteristics.  Fair values for other loans (i.e., commercial real estate and investment property mortgage loans, commercial and industrial loans) are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for impaired loans is described above.

54
recurring basis.

73


Accrued Interest:

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value.


Bank-owned life insurance: The carrying amount of life insurance contracts is assumed to be a reasonable fair value. Life insurance contracts are carried on the balance sheets at their redemption value. This redemption value is based on existing market conditions and therefore represents the fair value of the contract.

Interest Rate Swaps: The fair values are based on quoted market prices or mathematical models using current and historical data.

Deposit Liabilities: The fair values disclosed for demand deposits (i.e., interest and noninterest-bearing checking, statement savings and money market accounts) are, by definition, equal to the amount payable at the reporting date (that is, their carrying  amounts). Fair values of fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits.

Borrowed Funds: The fair values offollowing tables present the Company’s FHLB advances and other borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Company’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments: The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the counterparties. For fixed-rate loan commitments, fair value also considers the difference between current levels of interest rates and the committed rates.  The fair value of standby letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements or on the estimated cost to terminate them or otherwise settle the obligations with the counterparties at the reporting date.  At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the fair value of loan commitments and standby letters of credit were deemed immaterial.

The estimated fair values and related carrying amounts of the Company's financial instruments are as follows:amounts:

 

 

December 31, 2020

 

(In thousands)

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Fair Value

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and short-term investments

 

$

124,566

 

 

$

124,566

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

124,566

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

82,848

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

82,848

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

82,848

 

Restricted investments

 

 

1,835

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,835

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,835

 

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

 

375

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

375

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

375

 

Loans, net

 

 

609,879

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

607,181

 

 

 

607,181

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

 

2,305

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

2,305

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

2,305

 

Mutual Funds

 

 

419

 

 

 

419

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

419

 

Bank-owned life insurance

 

 

14,321

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

14,321

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

14,321

 

Total financial assets

 

$

836,548

 

 

$

124,985

 

 

$

101,684

 

 

$

607,181

 

 

$

833,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

$

766,119

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

766,449

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

766,449

 

FHLB advances

 

 

12,606

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

16,724

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

16,724

 

Junior subordinated debt

 

 

4,124

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

3,990

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

3,990

 

Accrued interest payable

 

 

107

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

107

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

107

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

518

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

518

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

518

 

Total financial liabilities

 

$

783,474

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

787,788

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

787,788

 

 

 

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

 

Carrying Amount

 

 

Level 1

 

 

Level 2

 

 

Level 3

 

 

Fair Value

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and short-term investments

 

$

46,341

 

 

$

46,341

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

46,341

 

Securities available for sale

 

 

79,783

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

79,783

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

79,783

 

Restricted investments

 

 

2,016

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

2,016

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

2,016

 

Mortgage loans held for sale

 

 

247

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

247

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

247

 

Loans, net

 

 

544,999

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

541,367

 

 

 

541,367

 

Accrued interest receivable

 

 

1,984

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,984

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

1,984

 

Mutual funds

 

 

403

 

 

 

403

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

403

 

Bank-owned life insurance

 

 

13,961

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

13,961

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

13,961

 

Total financial assets

 

$

689,734

 

 

$

46,744

 

 

$

97,991

 

 

$

541,367

 

 

$

686,102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deposits

 

$

622,155

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

622,295

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

622,295

 

FHLB advances

 

 

16,695

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

16,724

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

16,724

 

Junior subordinated debt

 

 

4,124

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

4,446

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

4,446

 

Accrued interest payable

 

 

217

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

217

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

217

 

Interest rate swaps

 

 

140

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

140

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

140

 

Total financial liabilities

 

$

643,331

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

643,822

 

 

$

0

 

 

$

643,822

 

  December 31, 2017 
(In thousands) Carrying Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Fair Value 
Assets               
Cash and short-term investments $29,300  $29,091  $  $  $29,091 
Securities available for sale  72,153   382   71,771      72,153 
Restricted investments  1,546      1,546      1,546 
Loans, net  497,705      494,143   46   494,189 
Accrued interest receivable  1,940      1,940      1,940 
Interest rate swaps  233      233      233 
BOLI  13,234      13,234      13,234 
Total financial assets $616,111  $29,473  $582,867  $46  $612,386 
Liabilities                    
Deposits $570,023  $  $569,297  $  $569,297 
FHLB advances  7,860      7,766      7,766 
Junior subordinated debt  4,124      4,116      4,116 
Accrued interest payable  128      128      128 
Interest rate swaps  119      119      119 
Total financial liabilities $582,254  $  $581,426  $  $581,426 

  December 31, 2016 
(In thousands) Carrying Value  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Fair Value 
Assets               
Cash and short-term investments $67,846  $67,581  $  $  $67,581 
Securities available for sale  49,973   374   46,814   2,785   49,973 
Restricted investments  1,782      1,782      1,782 
Loans, net  458,608      455,514   88   455,602 
Accrued interest receivable  1,550      1,550      1,550 
Interest rate swaps  250      250      250 
BOLI  12,873      12,873      12,873 
Total financial assets $592,882  $67,955  $518,783  $2,873  $589,611 
Liabilities                    
Deposits $546,157  $  $545,669  $  $545,669 
FHLB advances  12,936      12,922      12,922 
Junior subordinated debt  4,124      4,144      4,144 
Accrued interest payable  112      112      112 
Interest rate swaps  216      216      216 
Total financial liabilities $563,545  $  $563,063  $  $563,063 

The Company assumes interest rate risk (the risk that general interest rate levels will change) as a result ofduring its normal operations. As a result, the fair values of the Company’s financial instruments will change when interest rate levels change and that change may be either favorable or unfavorable to the Company. Management attempts to match maturities of assets and liabilities to the extent believed necessary to minimize interest rate risk. However, borrowers with fixed rate obligations are less likely to prepay in a rising rate environment. Conversely, depositors who are receiving fixed rates are more likely to withdraw funds before maturity in a rising rate environment and less likely to do so in a falling rate environment. Management monitors rates and maturities of assets and liabilities and attempts to minimize interest rate risk by adjusting terms of new loans and deposits and by investing in securities with terms that mitigate the Company’s overall interest rate risk.


Note 19.

Other Operating Expenses


The following table summarizes the principal components of other operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations are:operations:

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Postage and courier

 

$

175

 

 

$

189

 

 

$

194

 

Paper and supplies

 

 

184

 

 

120

 

 

125

 

Taxes, other than income taxes

 

 

470

 

 

406

 

 

370

 

Charge-offs, other than loan charge-offs

 

 

252

 

 

186

 

 

300

 

Telephone

 

 

255

 

 

322

 

 

333

 

Directors' compensation

 

 

375

 

 

326

 

 

329

 

Managed service agreements

 

 

507

 

 

459

 

 

425

 

Other

 

 

1,347

 

 

 

1,419

 

 

 

1,338

 

 

 

$

3,565

 

 

$

3,427

 

 

$

3,414

 


(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Postage and courier $196  $192  $171 
Paper and supplies  135   148   156 
Taxes, other than income taxes  341   351   363 
Charge-offs, other than loan charge-offs  320   275   400 
Telephone  315   330   331 
Directors' compensation  322   240   218 
Managed service agreements  409   402   437 
Other  1,131   1,160   1,092 
  $3,169  $3,098  $3,168 

Directors’ compensation is allocated and expensed separately at both the Company and the Bank. The above year-to-year comparisons of directors’ compensation are on a consolidated basis.

Note 20.Concentration Risk

Note 20.Concentration Risk

The Company maintains its cash accounts in several correspondent banks. The balances with these correspondent banks may exceed federally insured limits at times, which management considers a normal business risk.


Note 21.

Capital Requirements


The Company meets the eligibility criteria of a small bank holding company in accordance with the Federal Reserve’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement issued in February 2015, and is no longer obligated to report consolidated regulatory capital.

The Bank continues to beis subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can triggerinitiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company's consolidatedCompany’s financial statements.condition and results of operations. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of theirits assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheetoff-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank's capital amounts and classificationsclassification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. Based on final rules issued by

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve technical changes were madeSystem (the “Federal Reserve”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation have adopted rules to align the capital rules withimplement the Basel III regulatory capital framework and to meet certain requirementsprovisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rules maintain the general structure of the prompt corrective action framework in effect at such time while incorporating certain increased minimum requirements.


On January 1, 2015, the Bank applied changes to the regulatory capital framework that were approved on July 9, 2013 by the federal banking regulatorsWall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Basel“Basel III Final Rule)Capital Rules”). The Bank has made the one-time irrevocable election to continue treating accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) under regulatory standards that were in place prior to the Basel III Final Rule in order to eliminate volatility of regulatory capital that can result from fluctuations in AOCI and the inclusion of AOCI in regulatory capital, as would otherwise be required under the Basel III Capital Rule. 

Effective January 1, 2015, the final rulesRules require the Bank to comply with the following minimum capital ratios: (i) common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% of risk-weighted assets; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0% of risk-weighted assets; (iii) a total capital ratio of 8.0% of risk-weighted assets; and (iv) a leverage ratio of 4.0% of total assets. These areratios set forth in the initial capital requirements, which will be phased-in over a four-year period. When fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, the rules will require the Bank to maintain such minimum ratiostable below, plus a 2.5% “capital conservation buffer” (other than for the leverage ratio).buffer.”  The phase-in of the capital conservation buffer requirement beganwas phased in beginning on January 1, 2016, at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets, increasingand increased by the same amount each year until it was fully implemented at 2.5% on January 1, 2019. Management believesThe capital conservation buffer is designed to absorb losses during periods of economic stress.  The capital conservation buffer is applicable to all ratios except the leverage ratio, which is noted below as Tier 1 capital to average assets.

The Bank must also comply with the capital requirements set forth in the “prompt corrective action” regulations pursuant to Section 38 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.  At December 31, 2020, the most recent notification from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond categorized the Bank will be compliant with the fully phased-in requirements when they become effective January 1, 2019. Management believes that the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject to as of December 31, 2017.

As of December 31, 2017, the Bank is well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.action regulations.  To be categorized asconsidered “well capitalized,” an institutioncapitalized” under these regulations, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based, common equity Tier 1have the capital Tier 1 risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the table. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's category.

56
table below.

75


Table of Contents

 

 

Actual

 

 

Minimum Capital Requirement

 

 

Well Capitalized Under

Prompt Corrective Action Provisions

 

(Dollars In thousands)

 

Amount

 

 

Ratio

 

 

Amount

 

 

Ratio

 

 

Amount

 

 

Ratio

 

As of December 31, 2020

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

79,784

 

 

 

13.9

%

 

$

46,024

 

 

 

8.0

%

 

$

57,530

 

 

 

10.0

%

Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

72,914

 

 

 

12.7

%

 

$

25,889

 

 

 

4.5

%

 

$

37,395

 

 

 

6.5

%

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

72,914

 

 

 

12.7

%

 

$

34,518

 

 

 

6.0

%

 

$

46,024

 

 

 

8.0

%

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

 

$

72,914

 

 

 

8.5

%

 

$

34,163

 

 

 

4.0

%

 

$

42,704

 

 

 

5.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

74,090

 

 

 

13.5

%

 

$

43,776

 

 

 

8.0

%

 

$

54,720

 

 

 

10.0

%

Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

68,863

 

 

 

12.6

%

 

$

24,624

 

 

 

4.5

%

 

$

35,568

 

 

 

6.5

%

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)

 

$

68,863

 

 

 

12.6

%

 

$

32,832

 

 

 

6.0

%

 

$

43,776

 

 

 

8.0

%

Tier 1 capital (to average assets)

 

$

68,863

 

 

 

9.4

%

 

$

29,298

 

 

 

4.0

%

 

$

36,622

 

 

 

5.0

%

The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are also presented in the following table.
  Actual  
Minimum Capital
Requirement
  
Well Capitalized Under Prompt
Corrective Action Provisions
 
(In thousands) Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio 
As of December 31, 2017                  
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) $64,354   12.4% $41,485   8.0% $51,856   10.0%
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $59,260   11.4% $23,335   4.5% $33,707   6.5%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $59,260   11.4% $31,114   6.0% $41,485   8.0%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) $59,260   9.2% $25,862   4.0% $32,328   5.0%
                         
As of December 31, 2016                        
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) $62,668   13.2% $38,075   8.0% $47,594   10.0%
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $58,143   12.2% $21,417   4.5% $30,936   6.5%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $58,143   12.2% $28,557   6.0% $38,075   8.0%
Tier 1 capital (to average assets) $58,143   9.2% $25,204   4.0% $31,505   5.0%

Note 22.Junior Subordinated Debt

Note 22.Junior Subordinated Debt

On September 21, 2006, the Company’s wholly-owned Connecticut statutory business trust, Fauquier Statutory Trust II, privately issued $4.0 million face amount of the trust’s Floating Rate Capital Securities in a pooled capital securities offering (Trust II).offering. Simultaneously, the trust used the proceeds of that sale to purchase $4.0 million principal amount of the Company’s Floating Rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures due 2036. The interest rate on the capital security resets every three months at 1.70% above the then current three-month LIBOR. Interest is paid quarterly. Total capital securities at December 31, 20172020 and December 31, 2016 amounted to2019 were $4.1 million on each date.million. The Trust II issuance of capital securities and the respective subordinated debentures are callable at any time after five years from the issue date.time. The subordinated debentures are an unsecured obligation of the Company and are junior in right of payment to all present and future senior indebtedness of the Company. The capital securities are guaranteed by the Company on a subordinated basis.


Note 23.Parent Company Only Financial Statements

Note 23.Parent Company Only Financial Statements

Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

 

December 31,

 

Assets

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Cash

 

$

733

 

 

$

598

 

Interest-bearing deposits in other banks

 

570

 

 

330

 

Investment in subsidiaries

 

 

75,588

 

 

 

70,313

 

Other assets

 

 

243

 

 

171

 

Total assets

 

$

77,134

 

 

$

71,412

 

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Junior subordinated debt

 

$

4,124

 

 

$

4,124

 

Other liabilities

 

 

549

 

 

166

 

Total liabilities

 

 

4,673

 

 

 

4,290

 

Shareholders' Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock and additional paid-in capital

 

 

16,369

 

 

 

15,964

 

Retained earnings

 

 

53,767

 

 

 

49,787

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

 

2,325

 

 

 

1,371

 

Total shareholders' equity

 

 

72,461

 

 

 

67,122

 

Total liabilities and shareholders' equity

 

$

77,134

 

 

$

71,412

 


(In thousands) December 31, 
Assets 2017  2016 
Cash $243  $511 
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks  580   580 
Investment in subsidiaries  59,334   57,390 
Other assets  310   384 
Total assets $60,467  $58,865 
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity        
Junior subordinated debt $4,124  $4,124 
Other liabilities  201   290 
Total liabilities  4,325   4,414 
Shareholders' Equity        
Common stock  15,526   15,364 
Retained earnings  40,491   39,824 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)  125   (737)
Total shareholders' equity  56,142   54,451 
         
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $60,467  $58,865 

Statements of Operations

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest income

 

$

2

 

 

$

9

 

 

$

4

 

Dividends from subsidiaries

 

 

2,423

 

 

 

2,654

 

 

 

1,813

 

Total interest and dividend income

 

 

2,425

 

 

 

2,663

 

 

 

1,817

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

 

186

 

 

199

 

 

199

 

Legal and professional fees

 

 

197

 

 

184

 

 

149

 

Directors' fees

 

 

241

 

 

218

 

 

218

 

Miscellaneous

 

 

282

 

 

285

 

 

288

 

Total expense

 

906

 

 

886

 

 

854

 

Income before income tax benefits and equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

 

 

1,519

 

 

 

1,777

 

 

 

963

 

Income tax benefit

 

 

(307

)

 

 

(298

)

 

 

(289

)

Income before equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

 

 

1,826

 

 

 

2,075

 

 

 

1,252

 

Equity in undistributed net income of subsidiaries

 

 

4,051

 

 

 

4,745

 

 

 

4,883

 

Net income

 

$

5,877

 

 

$

6,820

 

 

$

6,135

 


(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Income         
Interest income $4  $8  $9 
Dividends from subsidiaries  1,808   901   1,797 
Total interest and dividend income  1,812   909   1,806 
Expenses            
Interest expense  199   200   199 
Legal and professional fees  105   112   107 
Directors' fees  212   164   141 
Miscellaneous  145   141   143 
Total expense  661   617   590 
Income before income tax benefits and equity in undistributed (distributed) net income (loss) of subsidiaries  1,151   292   1,216 
Income tax benefit  (229)  (207)  (198)
Income before equity in undistributed (distributed) net income (loss) of subsidiaries  1,380   499   1,414 
Equity in undistributed (distributed) net income (loss) of subsidiaries  1,116   3,175   (2,026)
Net income (loss) $2,496  $3,674  $(612)

Statements of Cash Flows

Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018

(In thousands)

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

5,877

 

 

$

6,820

 

 

$

6,135

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Undistributed earnings of subsidiaries

 

 

(4,051

)

 

 

(4,745

)

 

 

(4,883

)

Issuance of vested restricted stock

 

 

175

 

 

90

 

 

90

 

Amortization of unearned compensation, net of forfeiture

 

254

 

 

153

 

 

 

133

 

(Increase) decrease in other assets

 

 

-

 

 

 

1

 

 

 

(33

)

Increase in other liabilities

 

 

41

 

 

4

 

 

18

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

2,296

 

 

 

2,323

 

 

 

1,460

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Repurchase of common stock

 

 

(24

)

 

 

(21

)

 

 

(8

)

Cash dividends paid on common stock

 

 

(1,897

)

 

 

(1,836

)

 

 

(1,813

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

 

(1,921

)

 

 

(1,857

)

 

 

(1,821

)

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

375

 

 

 

466

 

 

 

(361

)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning

 

 

928

 

 

 

462

 

 

 

823

 

Ending

 

$

1,303

 

 

$

928

 

 

$

462

 


(In thousands) 2017  2016  2015 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities         
Net income (loss) $2,496  $3,674  $(612)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:            
(Undistributed) distributed earnings of subsidiaries  (1,116)  (3,175)  2,026 
Tax effect of restricted stock awards     42   22 
Issuance of vested restricted stock  90   68   60 
Amortization of unearned compensation  79   170   28 
(Increase) decrease in other assets  (8)     175 
Increase in other liabilities  6   2   136 
Net cash provided by operating activities  1,547   781   1,835 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities            
Repurchase of common stock  (7)  (55)   
Cash dividends paid  (1,808)  (1,803)  (1,984)
Net cash (used in) financing activities  (1,815)  (1,858)  (1,984)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (268)  (1,077)  (149)
Cash and Cash Equivalents            
Beginning  1,091   2,168   2,317 
Ending $823  $1,091  $2,168 

Note 24.

Investment in Affordable Housing Projects

The Company has investments in certain affordable housing projects located in the Commonwealth of Virginia through sixseveral limited liability partnerships of the Bank. These partnerships exist to develop and preserve affordable housing for low income families through residential rental property projects. The Company exerts no control over the operating or financial policies of the partnerships. Return on these investments is through receipt of tax credits and other tax benefits which are subject to recapture by taxing authorities based on compliance features at the project level. The investments are due to expire by 2033.2035. The Company accounts for the affordable housing investments using the equity method and has recorded $3.8 million $4.0and $4.2 million in other assets at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. The Company has also recorded $1.0 million$397,000 and $1.8 million$749,000 in other liabilities at December 31, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively, related to unfunded capital commitments through 2019.2023. The related federal tax credits for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018 were $422,000, $406,000$479,000, $552,000 and $502,000$504,000, respectively, and were included in income tax expense in the consolidated statements of

77


Table of Contents

operations. There were $126,000$409,000, $236,000 and $266,000 in flow-through losses recognized during the year ended December 31, 20172020, 2019 and $267,000 and $482,000 in the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,2018, respectively, that were included in noninterest income.

Note 25.Leases

The following tables present information about the Company’s leases:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

 

Lease liability

 

$

4,570

 

Right-of-use asset

 

$

4,495

 

Weighted average remaining lease term

 

7.82 years

 

Weighted average discount rate

 

 

3.55

%


(In thousands)

 

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

 

2018

 

Lease Expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating lease expense

 

 

 

$

810

 

 

$

804

 

 

$

686

 

Short-term lease expense

 

 

 

 

16

 

 

 

15

 

 

13

 

Total lease expense

 

 

 

$

826

 

 

$

819

 

 

$

699

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash paid for amounts included in lease liabilities

 

 

 

$

671

 

 

644

 

 

NR*

 

*Not reportable

Maturities of the Company’s lease liabilities are set forth in the table below.

(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

 

2021

 

$

626

 

2022

 

 

694

 

2023

 

 

707

 

2024

 

 

646

 

2025

 

 

537

 

Thereafter

 

 

2,067

 

Total undiscounted cash flows

 

 

5,277

 

Less:  Discount

 

 

(707

)

Total

 

$

4,570

 

58

78


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the SEC. An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operations of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) at the end of the period covered by this report was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the management of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer. Based on such an evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of such period.


The Company regularly assesses the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting and enhances its controls in response to internal control assessments and internal and external audit and regulatory recommendations. There have not been any significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, such controls during the quarter ended December 31, 2017.


2020.

There have been no material changes to the quantitative and qualitative disclosures made in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.


2020.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. (“Management”) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Management’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.


As of December 31, 2017,2020, Management has assessed the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.Commission in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the assessment, Management determined that it maintained effective internal control over the financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2020, based on thethe 2013 framework criteria.


No changes were made in Management’s internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 20172020 that have materially affected, or that are reasonably likely to materially affect, Management’s internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.



ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information concerning

Directors

The following biographical information discloses each director’s age and business experience, including the specific skills or attributes that qualify each director for service on the Board, and the year that each individual was first elected to the Board.

John B. Adams, Jr. (age 75) has been a director of Fauquier since 2003 and a director of The Fauquier Bank since 2002. He was elected chairman of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank in 2010. Mr. Adams was president and chief executive officer of A. Smith Bowman Distillery from 1989 to 2003. Mr. Adams serves as president and chief executive officer of Bowman Companies, Inc., primarily a family real estate holding company, and was a director of Universal Corporation, a publicly traded company headquartered in Richmond, Virginia, from 2003 to 2018. Mr. Adams served as chairman of The National Theatre in Washington, D.C. for 25 years and has served on the foundation boards of several higher education institutions. As a result of his various leadership roles, Mr. Adams brings to the Fauquier Board valuable insight and business acumen, along with significant business expertise.

Marc J. Bogan (age 54) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since February 2016. He has served as president of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since February 2016 and became chief executive officer of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank effective March 2016. Mr. Bogan has over 30 years of experience in the financial services industry. He served as president and chief operating officer of New Dominion Bank in Charlotte, North Carolina, from June 2011 until February 2016, when he joined Fauquier. Mr. Bogan was executive vice president, chief operating officer and chief retail officer for Ameris Bank, a four-state community bank based in Georgia, from 2008 to 2011, and was coastal regional executive – Eastern South Carolina for Ameris Bank from 2006 to 2008. Prior to joining Ameris Bank in 2006, Mr. Bogan held several senior management positions with Bank of America and South Carolina Bank and Trust. Mr. Bogan brings to the Fauquier Board significant management experience in diverse areas such as retail and commercial banking, private wealth management, information technology, operations, treasury services and mortgage banking.

Kevin T. Carter (age 55) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since November 2016. Mr. Carter has served as the managing director of Landsdown Resort since December 2020.  He has over 38 years of experience in the hospitality industry, holding positions such as director, corporate director, resident manager, general manager, independent consultant and president of Guests, Inc. from October 2016 to December 2020.  Mr. Carter served on the management teams of some of the country’s most notable properties including the Guests, Inc., the U.S. Grant Hotel, Intercontinental Hotel San Diego, Rancho Valencia Resort, Kiawah Island Resort, Bald Head Island Resort and The Founders Inn. He is currently a member of the Town Council of Warrenton, Virginia. Mr. Carter has been a member of the board of directors of the Fauquier County Chamber of Commerce, the Fauquier Hospital and Health System and the PATH Foundation. In addition, he has served as the president of the Warrenton Rotary Club and Senior Warden and School Board Treasurer for the St. James Episcopal Church in Warrenton, Virginia. Through his personal community involvement in the Town of Warrenton and Fauquier County, Virginia, and his professional experience, Mr. Carter provides the Fauquier Board with significant knowledge of Fauquier’s market base and financial management skills.

Donna D. Flory (age 60) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since 2015. Ms. Flory is currently the director of human resources for QMT Windchimes, a manufacturing company based in Manassas Park, Virginia. In addition, as an independent contractor, Ms. Flory provides financial support to the Industrial Development Authority of Prince William County, Virginia. Ms. Flory served as the Vice President of the Flory Small Business Development Center, Inc. (the “Flory Center”), located in Manassas, Virginia, from 1992 to 2019 and was responsible for financial operations, human resources, payroll, employee benefits and general operations. The Flory Center was a nonprofit organization that assisted small businesses and start-up entrepreneurs in accessing capital, developing business and marketing plans, and was a resource partner with the SBA. Ms. Flory also has significant experience in hospitality management, holding various management positions with Tysons Westpark Hotel and Ramada Inn from 1982 to 1989. Ms. Flory serves her community through leadership roles in the American Red Cross, Rotary International, March of Dimes and Bugles Across America. She is a Past President of Habitat for Humanity of Prince William County, and the cities of Manassas and Manassas Park, Virginia. Through her business and community involvement, Ms. Flory brings to the Fauquier Board a diverse range of professional skills and relationships.

Randolph D. Frostick (age 64) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since 2009. He is an attorney with Vanderpool, Frostick and Nishanian, P.C., a law firm located in Manassas, Virginia, which focuses primarily on civil litigation, business, employment, real estate transactions, financing, land use and development. Mr. Frostick joined the firm in 1987. In addition to practicing law, Mr.

80


Table of Contents

Frostick is actively involved in real estate development and commercial leasing in Manassas, Virginia. Mr. Frostick brings to the Fauquier Board insightful knowledge of Fauquier’s market base, and valuable business expertise.

Jay B. Keyser (age 64) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since 2009. Since January 2015, he has served as the chief executive of the William A. Hazel Family Office. He is also the manager of various real estate ventures and trustee of multiple trusts relating to the Hazel family. He currently serves on the board and was the chief executive officer of William A. Hazel, Inc., a site construction company headquartered in Chantilly, Virginia, from June 2008 to December 2014. Mr. Keyser had served for 25 years in various capacities, including chief financial officer, of this construction entity. He has served as board trustee for Highland School, located in Warrenton, Virginia. He received his Certified Public Accountant certification in 1982 and is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Virginia Society of CPAs. Mr. Keyser brings vast business and financial management knowledge and experience to the Fauquier Board.

Randolph T. Minter (age 61) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since 1996. Mr. Minter has been president and owner of Moser Funeral Home, Inc. since 1986, having worked prior to that time in various positions at the funeral home since 1980. He also has owned and operated Bright View Cemetery, Inc. in Fauquier County, Virginia since 1990. Through his involvement and leadership positions with a variety of business and community organizations, Mr. Minter brings to the Fauquier Board a vast knowledge of Fauquier’s community market base, and its business related issues.

Brian S. Montgomery (age 68) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since 1990. Mr. Montgomery was the owner and president of Warrenton Foreign Car, Inc. located in Warrenton, Virginia, from 1972 to 2020 and is the owner and manager of various commercial real estate properties located in Warrenton, Virginia. Mr. Montgomery brings extensive knowledge of the financial services industry to the Fauquier Board, with a specialty in insurance through his tenure on the board of Loudoun Mutual Insurance Company, where he has been a director since 1999.

P. Kurtis Rodgers (age 53) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since 2007. Mr. Rodgers is president and chief executive officer of S.W. Rodgers Co., Inc., a heavy highway site contractor headquartered in Gainesville, Virginia that operates throughout Virginia. Prior to his appointment as president in 1998, Mr. Rodgers served in multiple capacities within S.W. Rodgers Co., Inc. since its establishment in 1980. He is the past president of the Heavy Construction Contractors Association (a Virginia association) and has served on advisory panels for the James Madison University College of Business and the George Mason University Prince William Campus. Mr. Rodgers brings valuable business management expertise and knowledge to the Fauquier Board.

Sterling T. Strange, III (age 60) has been a director of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since 2007. Mr. Strange is president and chief executive officer of The Solution Design Group, Inc., an information technology software firm to the public sector and higher education industries, located in Warrenton, Virginia and Orlando, Florida. Prior to founding The Solution Design Group, Inc. in 2004, Mr. Strange was president and founder of Decision Support Technologies, Inc., a transportation software company that provided solutions and services to over 100 airports and seaports worldwide. Mr. Strange has served in senior management positions in both private and public companies for over 30 years. He provides valuable entrepreneurial experience and financial management expertise to the Fauquier Board.

Executive Officers

The following provides information on the executive officers of the Company required by this item is containedwho are not directors:

Christine E. Headly (age 65) has served as executive vice president and chief financial officer of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank since September 2016. Ms. Headly was senior vice president and controller of The Fauquier Bank from May 2013 to September 2016, and previously served as a vice president and controller from 2007 to May 2013. Ms. Headly joined The Fauquier Bank in the Company’s definitive proxy statement for the 2018 annual meeting1999.

Chip S. Register (age 64) has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of shareholdersFauquier and The Fauquier Bank since January 2020. Mr. Register was Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Information Officer of The Fauquier Bank from June 2016 to be held on May 15, 2018 (the “2018 proxy statement”) under the captions “ElectionJanuary 2020, and previously served as Chief Information Officer of Two Class I Directors,” “Meetings and The Fauquier Bank beginning in 2008.


81


Table of Contents

Committees of the Board

Audit Committee. The Board has an Audit Committee, composed entirely of directors who satisfy the independence and financial literacy requirements for audit committee members under the Nasdaq listing standards and applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations. In addition, at least one member of the Audit Committee has past employment experience in finance or accounting or comparable experience which results in the individual’s financial sophistication. The Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee held five official meetings and several informal discussions in 2020. The current members of the Audit Committee are Messrs. Adams, Keyser, Rodgers and Strange and Ms. Flory. The Board of Directors has determined that Messrs. Keyser and Strange qualify as the audit committee financial experts as defined by SEC regulations and has designated them as the Company’s Audit Committee Financial Experts. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is posted on the Bank’s website: www.tfb.bank under “About Us – Investor Relations – Corporate Profile – Corporate Governance.The committee reviews and “Sectionreassesses the charter annually and recommends any changes to the Board for approval.

Governance Committee. The responsibilities of the Governance Committee include the evaluation of the Board’s structure, personnel and processes; and the maintaining of a current and viable set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company. The committee is composed of a majority of directors who satisfy the independence requirements under the Nasdaq listing standards. The members of the Governance Committee are Messrs. Adams, Bogan, Carter, Frostick and Strange. The committee held three official meetings in 2020 and several informal discussions. The Governance Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is posted on the Bank’s website: www.tfb.bank under “About Us – Investor Relations – Corporate Profile – Corporate Governance.” The committee reviews and reassesses the charter annually and recommends any changes to the Board for approval.

Compensation and Benefits Committee. The Board has a Compensation and Benefits Committee, whose function is to aid the full Board of Directors of the Company in meeting its overall responsibilities with regard to the oversight and determination of executive compensation. The committee, composed entirely of directors who satisfy the independence requirements for compensation committee members under the Nasdaq listing standards, held six official meetings and several informal discussions in 2020. The current members of the Company’s Compensation and Benefits Committee are Messrs. Adams, Carter, Minter, Montgomery and Rodgers. The Compensation and Benefits Committees operate pursuant to written charters, which are posted on the Bank’s website: www.tfb.bank under “About Us – Investor Relations – Corporate Profile – Corporate Governance.” The committees review and reassess the charters annually and recommend any changes to the Board for approval.

Enterprise Risk Management Committee. The responsibilities of the Enterprise Risk Management Committee are to assist the Board in its oversight of the Company’s management of financial, operational, information technology (to include cyber risk), credit, market, capital, liquidity, reputation, strategic, legal, compliance and other risks; and to oversee the Company’s enterprise risk management framework. The committee is composed entirely of directors who satisfy the independence requirements under the Nasdaq listing standards and applicable SEC regulations. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee held eight official meetings and several informal discussions in 2020. Current members of the committee are Messrs. Adams, Carter, Frostick, Keyser and Strange and Ms. Flory. The Enterprise Risk Management Committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is posted on the Bank’s website: www.tfb.bank under “About Us – Investor Relations – Corporate Profile – Corporate Governance.” The committee reviews and reassesses the charter annually and recommends any changes to the Board for approval.

Nominating Committee. The responsibilities of the Nominating Committee include the identification and evaluation of potential director candidates and making recommendations to the full Board regarding nominations of individuals for election to the Board of Directors. The committee is composed entirely of directors who satisfy the independence requirements for nominating committee members under the Nasdaq listing standards. The members of the Nominating Committee are Messrs. Adams and Minter and Ms. Flory. The committee held two official meeting in 2020 and several informal discussions. The committee operates pursuant to a written charter, which is posted on the Bank’s website: www.tfb.bank under “About Us – Investor Relations – Corporate Profile – Corporate Governance.” The committee reviews and reassesses the charter annually and recommends any changes to the Board for approval.

The Nominating Committee considers diversity in board composition and qualifications for consideration as a director nominee may vary according to the particular areas of expertise being sought as a complement to the existing Board composition. The committee generally reviews a potential candidate’s background, experience and abilities, the contributions the individual could be expected to make to the collective functioning of the Board and the needs of the Board at the time. The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines for the Company, which outline certain specific criteria that the Board seeks to attract, which include (i) a commitment to the Company’s purpose; (ii) informed, mature and practical judgment developed as a result of management or policy-making experience; (iii) business

82


Table of Contents

acumen, with an appreciation of the major issues facing a company of comparable size and sophistication; (iv) financial literacy in reading and understanding key performance reports; (v) integrity and an absence of conflicts of interest; (vi) visionary thinking and strategic planning expertise; (vii) ability to influence others; (viii) strong organizational and self-management skills; (ix) being independent according to Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules; (x) having sufficient time to prepare and meet Board commitments; (xi) works or resides in the Bank’s market area, thereby bringing current and relevant demographic knowledge to the Board; and (xii) meeting age limit requirements.

The Nominating Committee will consider candidates for directors proposed by shareholders. The committee will accept written submissions that include the name, address and telephone number of the proposed nominee, along with a brief statement of the candidate’s qualifications to serve as a director. All such shareholder recommendations should be submitted to the attention of the Chairman, Nominating Committee, Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., 10 Courthouse Square, Warrenton, Virginia 20186. Any candidates submitted by a shareholder are reviewed and considered in the same manner as all other candidates.

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,”Reports

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires that directors and is incorporated hereinexecutive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s equity securities, file reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of the Company’s outstanding equity securities. Based on a review of these reports filed by reference.


the Company’s officers and directors, the Company believes that its officers and directors complied with all filing requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during 2020.  

Code of Ethics

The Company has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to theits directors, executive officers and employees of the Company and the Bank. See Exhibit 14 in the exhibit list contained in Part IV, Item 15 of this Form 10-K.


employees.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Executive Compensation

Compensation Philosophy. The Company strives to be an organization where the atmosphere is satisfying, challenging and rewarding to our knowledgeable and skillful employees, which is critical to the Company’s ability to provide quality products and services to its customers, as well as a reasonable return to its shareholders. The compensation system is an integral part of this strategy and contributes significantly to the achievement of goals and objectives for the ongoing development of the Company and its human resources.

The Company’s compensation system is designed to: (i) attract employees whose qualifications clearly meet or exceed the minimum education, experience and skills specified for each job; (ii) attract employees who are willing to be held accountable for results; (iii) retain employees who achieve the high level of results expected; (iv) motivate employees to seek additional accountability, make and communicate well-informed business decisions, and achieve greater than expected results; and (v) differentiate employees between those who perform and those who do not want to be accountable or fail to achieve results.

Overview of Compensation Program. The Company’s Compensation and Benefits Committee (the “Committee”) approves the Company’s compensation philosophy, strategy and policy. The Committee develops Company goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer (“named executive officers” or “NEOs”), including annual and long-term performance objectives for joint approval by the independent members of the Boards of the Company and the Bank.

With the assistance of the independent members of the Company and Bank Boards, the Committee evaluates the performance of the NEOs and sets their annual compensation, including annual salary, cash and equity incentive awards, and other direct or indirect benefits. The Committee and the Company and Bank Boards annually approve compensation structures, job values, compensation budgets and distribution guidelines. In addition to the Chief Executive Officer, the Human Resources Director periodically attends Committee meetings and makes presentations to the Committee on compensation and benefits matters. The Committee meets in executive session, without the Chief Executive Officer, when discussing his compensation.

83


Table of Contents

Finally, the Committee is responsible for reviewing the competitiveness of the Company’s executive compensation programs to ensure (i) the attraction and retention of senior management; (ii) the motivation of senior management to achieve the Company’s business objectives; and (iii) the alignment of key leadership with the long-term interests of the Company’s shareholders.

Establishing Executive Compensation. The Company compensates our NEOs, and other members of senior management, through a mix of base salary, cash and equity incentive compensation, and perquisites and benefits designed to be competitive with our peer financial institutions, consisting of publicly traded banks, similar in asset size, and predominantly located in the greater Washington, D.C./Virginia markets. Cash and equity incentive awards to senior management are made pursuant to our Management Incentive Plan and Stock Incentive Plan (together, the “Incentive Plans”), which are designed to reward company-wide performance through tying awards to selected performance goals. Our goal is to provide our NEOs with a level of assured cash compensation in the form of base salary as well as cash and equity opportunities in the form of incentive compensation that will help recruit, retain and reward competent and effective executive talent, and at the same time align senior management’s interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders.

The compensation planning process consists primarily of annually establishing an overall executive compensation package, and allocating that compensation among base salary and cash and equity incentives under the Incentive Plans. In order to recruit and retain top executive talent whom we expect to provide performance that will create and sustain long-term value for our shareholders, we intentionally pay overall compensation that we believe is competitive with our peer group. Our base salaries are comparable with the base salaries paid by most of our peer group for comparable positions.

Decisions regarding the base salaries for the NEOs are generally made at the Committee’s first meeting following the availability of the Company’s financial results for the prior year. In addition to referring to proposed pay ranges, the Committee uses the prior year’s financial results to evaluate each NEO’s performance against individual performance plans for the prior year. Generally, at this meeting, the Committee also determines the extent to which the cash and equity incentive awards under the Incentive Plans for the prior year were earned by measuring actual outcomes against pre-determined performance goals. Performance goals are made as early as practicable in the year in order to maximize the time period for the incentives associated with the awards to be achieved. The Committee’s schedule is determined several months in advance, and the proximity of granting equity awards to announcements of earnings or other market events is coincidental. The Committee seeks the Chief Executive Officer’s input regarding the performance evaluation and compensation recommendations for the Company’s other NEO, although the Committee makes the final decision.

Base Salaries. Based on the evaluation of each NEO’s performance against individual performance plans and the review of the Company’s overall performance in 2019, the Committee recommended, and the independent members of the Board approved, the 2020 base salaries as follows:

$332,500 for the Chief Executive Officer

$200,000 for the Chief Financial Officer

$215,000 for the Chief Operating Officer

Management Incentive Plan. Our practice is to award incentive compensation based on satisfactory completion of pre-determined performance objectives. Cash incentive awards to senior management are made pursuant to our Management Incentive Plan, which is designed to reward the achievement of company-wide performance through the tying of awards to selected performance measures. The Committee approves the performance goals and award payouts and has the discretion to increase or decrease cash awards earned under the Management Incentive Plan.

The Committee reviewed the Company’s strategic objectives for 2020 and chose award factors relative to meeting certain primary objectives. The NEOs’ performance goal objectives were based on the following measures of the Company’s 2020 performance: net income, efficiency ratio, noninterest and fee income, loan growth, deposit growth, nonperforming assets, and CAMELS rating. Performance criteria, which the Company considers confidential strategic information, is not publicly disclosed for competitive reasons. Performance goals were scaled in order for a recipient to receive part of an award in the event a portion of the targeted goals were achieved.

The annual target award opportunity for each named executive officer is a percentage of the midpoint of his or her established position salary range as determined by the Committee. The 2020 annual target award opportunity for the Chief Executive Officer was 40% of such midpoint and for the Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer was 30% of such midpoint. Based on the results of the pre-determined goals, each officer earned approximately 130% of the target award opportunity.

84


Table of Contents

The participants of the MIP are eligible for payment once net income reaches 90% of budgeted net income.  Actual net income for 2020 was $5.9 million which includes $1.5 million in merger related expenses.  These merger expenses were removed and net income of $7.4 million was used to calculate the MIP results and payments.

Stock Incentive Plan. The Company believes that ownership of the Company’s common stock will motivate officers for the successful conduct of its business, and will better align their interests with the interests of the Company’s shareholders. The Stock Incentive Plan was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Company on February 21, 2019 and approved by the shareholders on May 21, 2019 at the Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting.

Under the Stock Incentive Plan, incentive and non-statutory stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards may be granted to employees and directors. The plan makes available up to 350,000 shares for issuance to participants under the plan. No more than 200,000 shares may be issued in connection with any type of award other than stock appreciation rights or incentive stock options.

The Stock Incentive Plan is administered by the Committee, which determines the employees to be granted options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units or other stock-based awards, whether such options will be incentive or non-statutory options, the number of shares subject to each option or award, whether such options may be exercised by delivering other shares of common stock, and when such options or awards vest.

We have granted equity awards under the Stock Incentive Plan, and historically those awards have been made in the forms of restricted stock and restricted stock units. The Committee believes that restricted stock and restricted stock units are generally more effective than stock options when aligning the interests of the executives with those of the Company’s shareholders. The overall target award opportunity is defined as a percentage of base salary, divided equally between awards of restricted stock that have a time-based vesting component and restricted stock units that have a performance-based vesting component. The restricted stock awards vest according to a three-year cliff, becoming fully vested after three full years of continued employment. The restricted stock unit awards are earned at the end of a three-year performance period depending on the average of the Company’s past three years’ actual return on average equity performance relative to the defined SNL National Peer Group’s average over the three-year period. Each performance-based restricted stock unit award agreement allows the award to be issued in stock at 50% of the value of the award and in cash at 50% of the value of the award, to allow for applicable taxes withheld by the participants.

The 2020 annual target award opportunity was 35% of base salary for the Chief Executive Officer and 25% of base salary for the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Operating Officer. The grants of time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units were made on February 20, 2020 under the Stock Incentive Plan.

In December 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the acceleration of service-based vesting of certain restricted stock awards, and the acceleration of vesting and payment of certain restricted stock units, in each case with respect to awards that would otherwise have become fully vested upon completion of the Merger.  The vesting and payment of the impacted restricted stock units was based on target performance for the applicable performance period. These actions resulted in the (i) vesting on an accelerated basis of 8,017 and 3,205 shares of restricted stock of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer, respectively, (ii) vesting and payment on an accelerated basis of 5,419 and 2,250 restricted stock units of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Operating Officer, respectively, with such restricted stock units settled 50% in cash and 50% in shares of the Company’s common stock,

401(k) Savings Plan. To encourage saving for retirement and as a retention tool, the Bank maintains a defined contribution 401(k) savings plan (the “401(k) Savings Plan”), covering employees on the first day of hire who are at least 18 years of age and work at least 20 hours per week. Under the plan, participants may contribute an amount up to the Internal Revenue Service maximum amount of their covered compensation for the year. Eligible participants receive a 3% employer contribution that is 100% vested. In addition, eligible participants receive a 100% match on the first 6% of compensation deferred.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan. In 2005, the Company adopted a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for executives (the “Executive SERP”), which is a supplemental benefit plan designed to ensure that participants will have, upon retirement from the Company or its subsidiaries, retirement benefits targeted at 70% (prorated if the participant has fewer than 10 years of benefit service) of base salary and incentive pay when added together with benefits provided through Social Security, the Company’s non-contributory defined benefit plan (terminated in 2009), and employer contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan. A participant’s employee contributions to the 401(k) Savings Plan are not taken into account in determining the 70% target and thus will increase the total retirement benefits available to the participant.

85


Table of Contents

The Company adopted this plan to provide consistent retirement benefits as a percent of final compensation for individuals whose retirement compensation under any qualified retirement plan sponsored by the Company or the Bank is limited by maximums imposed on these plans by law. Employees eligible to participate in the Executive SERP during 2019 included Mr. Bogan and any individuals designated by the Board of Directors as plan participants. Subject to certain specified forfeiture events (termination of employment for cause, pre-change in control competition, or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information), an eligible employee will have a vested and non-forfeitable right in supplemental retirement benefits under the Executive SERP upon the first of the following events to occur while being an active participant in the Executive SERP: (i) the participant meets the age and service requirements for early retirement under the Executive SERP (60 years of age with 10 years of vesting service); (ii) the participant reaches normal retirement date (65 years of age); (iii) the participant retires on a disability retirement date (first day of the month following the date participant retires as a result of a disability); or (iv) a change in control of the Company or the Bank.

Supplemental retirement benefits are payable under the Executive SERP for 180 months (15 years), with the amount payable reduced actuarially in the event payment begins before the participant reaches the normal retirement date. If the participant dies before receiving monthly payments for 180 months, the remaining monthly benefits will be paid to the participant’s beneficiary until the Executive SERP has made a total of 180 monthly payments. In addition, the Executive SERP provides a pre-retirement death benefit payable for 15 years to the participant’s beneficiary, with the amount payable reduced actuarially in the event payment begins before the participant reaches the normal retirement date.

On September 21, 2016, the Company entered into a participation agreement with Mr. Bogan relating to the Executive SERP. Mr. Bogan has not met the vesting requirements for the plan. Based on contribution rates and plan provisions and assumptions in effect on January 1, 2020, with retirement at age 65, the estimated monthly retirement benefit for Mr. Bogan under the Executive SERP is $4,427.

On January 19, 2017, the Company entered into a separate Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan agreement with Ms. Headly. Supplemental retirement benefits are payable under this plan for 15 years with the amount payable accruing after each year of service. At the end of 2020, Ms. Headly had a 100% vested annual benefit of $10,000. Each year after 2017 the annual vested benefit increases 25% or $2,500 until attainment of age 65, at which time she will be fully vested with an annual benefit of $10,000.  

On September 14, 2015, the Company entered into a separate Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan agreement with Mr. Register.  Mr. Register will have a vested and non-forfeitable right in supplemental retirement benefits under the Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan upon the first of the following events to occur while being an active participant in the Plan: (i) the participant reaches normal retirement date (65 years of age); (ii) the participant becomes disabled and terminates employment or upon death (after having completed 10 years of continuous service); or (iv) a change in control of the Company or the Bank.  Upon vesting Mr. Register will benefits payable under this plan for 15 years in the amount of $10,000 annually.

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, Virginia National and the Company have agreed to fully vest the Company’s supplemental executive retirement plans and directoragreements that are subject to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and terminate and liquidate those plans and agreements by making a lump sum payment to each plan participant in accordance with Section 409A of the Code. The Company’s Chief Financial Officer, who will be fully vested in benefits under her plan prior to the effective time of the Merger, will receive a lump sum payment of benefits under her plan equal to $150,000, without reduction for present value. The Company’s Chief Operating Officer will receive a lump sum payment of benefits under his plan equal to $150,000, without reduction for present value. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer will receive a lump sum payment of benefits under his plan equal to $1,850,000; provided, however, that this amount may be adjusted in the event that the discount rate used for financial accounting with respect to the supplemental executive retirement plans changes to a rate that is five or more whole percentage points from the rate in effect as of the date of the Merger Agreement.

Employment Agreement with Chief Executive Officer. On June 6, 2016, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Bogan effective February 18, 2016 with an initial term until December 31, 2019. The Company’s Board of Directors determined that an employment agreement with Mr. Bogan was appropriate because it clarifies the terms of his employment and ensures that the Company and the Bank are protected by non-competition, non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions in the event Mr. Bogan ceases employment. In addition, the Company’s Board of Directors believes an employment agreement is necessary to attract and retain a qualified chief executive officer. Beginning December 31, 2017 and on each December 31st thereafter, the term of the employment agreement is automatically extended for an additional year so as to terminate three years from each renewal date, unless the Company notifies Mr. Bogan in writing prior to the renewal date. During December 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors and Mr. Bogan amended the employment agreement to clarify certain matters related to a termination following a change in control.

86


Table of Contents

Under the agreement, Mr. Bogan serves as the chief executive officer of the Company and the Bank at an annual base salary of not less than $310,000 per year. The base salary may be increased or decreased in the sole discretion of the compensation and benefits committee or the Company’s Board of Directors, but not below the minimum amount of $310,000. The agreement also provides that Mr. Bogan is eligible to participate in the Company’s short and long-term incentive plans, with targeted performance levels for the Company to be established by the compensation and benefits committee or the Company’s Board of Directors. Any incentive-based compensation or award to which Mr. Bogan is entitled is subject to clawback by the Company as required by applicable federal law. The agreement further provides that Mr. Bogan is eligible to participate in any employee benefit plans that are provided for executive management, including group medical, disability and life insurance, paid time off and retirement.

The agreement provides that Mr. Bogan will be entitled to receive certain severance payments in the event of a termination of employment under certain circumstances. If the Company terminates Mr. Bogan’s employment without “cause” or Mr. Bogan terminates his employment with “good reason” (as such terms are defined in the agreement), in a non-change in control context, he will receive (i) any earned but unpaid incentive bonus with respect to any completed calendar year immediately preceding the date of termination, (ii) the product of the annual cash bonus paid or payable, including by reason or deferral, for the most recently completed year and a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in the current year through the date of termination and the denominator of which is 365, and (iii) base salary in effect on the date of termination for a period of 24 months from the date of termination. In addition, if he elects coverage under COBRA, Mr. Bogan will be entitled to a reimbursement of the difference between the monthly COBRA premium amount paid by Mr. Bogan for him and his eligible dependents and the monthly premium paid by the Company for similarly situated active employees, provided that such benefits will not extend beyond the 18-month period permitted by COBRA.

If Mr. Bogan’s employment ends due to death prior to a “change in control” of the Company (as such term is defined in the agreement), the Company will continue to pay his base salary for three months following the month of his death to his designated beneficiary. If Mr. Bogan’s employment ends due to his termination by the Company for cause, or if he resigns his position without good reason or, prior to a change in control of the Company, he is terminated as a result of his incapacity, he would not be entitled to any additional compensation, bonus or benefits under the agreement.

If Mr. Bogan’s employment is terminated by him for good reason or by the Company on account of its failure to renew the agreement or without cause (other than on account of his death or incapacity), in each case within 24 months following a change in control of the Company, he is entitled to receive the following payments and benefits, provided he signs a release in favor of the Company: (i) the sum of (a) any accrued but unpaid base salary, unreimbursed expenses and such employee benefits (including equity compensation) to which he is entitled, (b) the amount, if any, of any earned but unpaid incentive or bonus compensation with respect to any completed calendar year immediately preceding the date of termination, (c) the product of the annual cash bonus paid or payable for the most recently completed year and a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in the current year through the date of termination and the denominator of which is 365, and (d) any benefits or awards (including cash and stock components) which pursuant to the terms of any plans, policies or programs have been earned or become payable, but which have not been paid; (ii) a lump sum payment amount equal to 2.99 times the total of (a) his base salary in effect at the date of termination plus (b) the highest annual cash bonus paid or payable for the two most recently completed years; and (iii) reimbursement of the difference between the monthly COBRA premium amount paid by Mr. Bogan for him and his eligible dependents and the monthly premium paid by the Company for similarly situated active employees, provided that such benefits will not extend beyond the 18-month period permitted by COBRA.

Under the agreement, Mr. Bogan is subject to two-year noncompetition restriction and a two-year nonsolicitation restriction following the termination of his employment for any reason.

Mr. Bogan has entered into an employment agreement with Virginia National that will be effective at the closing of the Merger that will supersede and replace his existing employment agreement with the Company. See the following description of that employment agreement.

New Virginia National Employment Agreement with Chief Executive Officer.  Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the merger of The Bank into Virginia National Bank, Mr. Bogan will be employed as president and chief executive officer of Virginia National Bank. Virginia National and Virginia National Bank have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Bogan pursuant to which he will serve as president and chief executive officer of Virginia National Bank and that will be effective upon consummation of the merger until the two-year anniversary of the effectiveness of the merger. Upon its effectiveness, the new employment agreement with Mr. Bogan will supersede Mr. Bogan’s current employment agreement with the Company, and accordingly Mr. Bogan will have no rights or entitlements and will receive no payments or benefits under his current employment agreement with the Company at the effective time of the merger.

87


Table of Contents

Mr. Bogan’s new employment agreement provides that Mr. Bogan will receive an annual base salary to be determined by Virginia National in accordance with its salary administration program, with the initial base salary equal to Mr. Bogan’s base salary as president and chief executive officer of the Company prior to the merger (currently, $350,000). Mr. Bogan’s base salary will be reviewed annually and will be subject to adjustment by the board of directors or compensation committee of Virginia National, provided that any downward adjustment may only be made in connection with a general reduction of base salary that affects all senior officers of Virginia National. Mr. Bogan’s new employment agreement provides opportunities for short- and long-term cash and equity incentive opportunities and certain other benefits, including an automobile allowance and reimbursement of business and relocation expenses.

Mr. Bogan’s new employment agreement further provides that, if Mr. Bogan is not promoted to chief executive officer of Virginia National on or before the first anniversary of the effectiveness of the merger but remains employed by Virginia National on that date, Mr. Bogan will receive a lump sum payment of $475,000 within thirty (30) days of such first anniversary.

Further, if Mr. Bogan is either (i) not promoted to chief executive officer of Virginia National on or before the second anniversary of the effective date of the merger but remains employed by Virginia National on that date, or (ii) Mr. Bogan is promoted to chief executive officer within two years following the effective date of the merger, then he will be offered an agreement, which will be effective no later than the earlier of the day following the second anniversary of the effectiveness of the merger or the date he is promoted to chief executive officer, as may be applicable, providing for benefits on a change in control of Virginia National in an amount no less favorable than those provided to the then-serving chief executive officer of Virginia National.

If, prior to being promoted to chief executive officer of Virginia National or otherwise entering into the change in control agreement described in the preceding paragraph, Mr. Bogan is terminated without “cause” or resigns for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the employment agreement), Mr. Bogan’s new employment agreement provides certain benefits. In such cases, Mr. Bogan will receive the sum of (i) any accrued but unpaid base salary, unreimbursed expenses and such employee benefits (including equity compensation) to which he is entitled, (ii) the amount, if any, of any earned but unpaid incentive or bonus compensation with respect to any completed calendar year immediately preceding the date of termination, (iii) the product of the annual cash bonus paid or payable for the most recently completed year and a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in the current year through the date of termination and the denominator of which is 365, and (iv) any benefits or awards (including cash and stock components) which pursuant to the terms of any plans, policies or programs have been earned or become payable, but which have not been paid. Unless otherwise specified in the employment agreement, such benefits will be paid in a lump sum within 10 days following the effective date of the release (described below).

Further, he will receive an amount equal to 2.99 times the sum of (i) his base salary in effect at the date of termination, and (ii) his highest annual cash bonus paid or payable for the two most recently completed years. This severance benefit will be paid to Mr. Bogan in a lump sum cash payment within thirty (30) days after the effective date of the release (described below). In addition, if he elects coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended (“COBRA”), Mr. Bogan will be entitled to a reimbursement of the difference between the monthly COBRA premium amount paid by Mr. Bogan for him and his eligible dependents and the monthly premium paid by Virginia National for similarly situated active employees, provided that such benefits will not extend beyond the 18-month period permitted by COBRA.

Mr. Bogan’s entitlement to the foregoing severance payments is subject to his execution of a release and waiver of claims against Virginia National and its affiliates.

Mr. Bogan’s new employment agreement requires Mr. Bogan to execute Virginia National’s standard non-disclosure, non-solicitation and non-competition agreement except that the non-competition period may be up to 24 months following termination of employment depending upon the circumstances of his termination.

Under the new employment agreement with Mr. Bogan, if the payments and benefits under the employment agreement, together with other payments and benefits Mr. Bogan has received or may have the right to receive, on account of a change in control would subject Mr. Bogan to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, then the payments and benefits shall be reduced by Virginia National to the minimum extent necessary so that none of the payments or benefits are subject to the excise tax, provided that no such reduction shall be made if Mr. Bogan’s net after-tax benefit, assuming no reduction, exceeds by $25,000 or more the net after-tax benefit assuming such reduction is made.

Under the new employment agreement with Mr. Bogan, he will generally have “good reason” to terminate his employment if Virginia National assigns duties inconsistent with his position, authority, duties or responsibilities without his prior consent; takes action that results

88


Table of Contents

in a substantial reduction in his status including a diminution in position, authority, duties or responsibilities (which will occur on the date of the merger as a result of the diminution of Mr. Bogan’s position because of the merger); moves his primary office outside of the city of Charlottesville, Virginia or Albemarle County, Virginia, unless either Virginia National or Virginia National Bank moves its principal executive offices to such other place; fails to comply with any material term of the agreement; or fails to nominate him for election to Virginia National’s board of directors. Under the new employment agreement, except for the diminution of Mr. Bogan’s position because of the merger, good reason to terminate employment would not exist unless Mr. Bogan has notified Virginia National of the condition giving rise to good reason, Virginia National has failed to remedy the condition, and Mr. Bogan terminates employment within ninety days of the initial occurrence of the condition giving rise to good reason. For good reason due to the diminution of Mr. Bogan’s position because of the merger, good reason will apply provided Mr. Bogan provides written notice to Virginia National at least 30 days prior to his termination date.

Under the new employment agreement with Mr. Bogan, termination for “cause” would generally include Mr. Bogan’s failure to perform material duties or responsibilities or failure to follow reasonable instructions or policies; conviction of, indictment for or entry of a guilty plea or plea of no contest with respect to a felony or misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, misappropriation or embezzlement of funds or property; fraud or dishonesty with respect to Virginia National; breach of fiduciary duties owed to Virginia National; breach of a material term of the agreement or material violation of applicable policies, codes and standards of behavior; or conduct reasonably likely to result in material injury to Virginia National. Under the new employment agreement, and except in cases involving irreparable injury, Virginia National would not have cause to terminate Mr. Bogan’s employment unless Virginia National has notified Mr. Bogan of the acts constituting “cause” and Mr. Bogan has failed to remedy them.

Employment Agreement with Chief Financial Officer. On August 1, 2020, we entered into an updated employment agreement with Ms. Headly effective on that date. The Board determined that an employment agreement with Ms. Headly was appropriate because it clarifies the terms of her employment and ensures the Company and the Bank are protected by non-compete, non-solicitation and confidentiality provisions in the event Ms. Headly ceases employment. In addition, the Board believes an employment agreement is necessary to attract and retain a qualified Chief Financial Officer in our industry.

Ms. Headly’s employment agreement provides for a fixed term through December 31, 2021, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The employment agreement provides for a minimum base salary of $200,000 per year. Ms. Headly will have the opportunity to earn short- and long-term cash and equity incentive awards and certain other benefits, including reimbursement of business expenses.

Ms. Headly’s employment agreement provides for benefits in the event of a termination of her employment by the Company without “cause” or by her for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the employment agreement). In such cases, Ms. Headly will be entitled to receive (i) the amount, if any, of any earned but unpaid incentive or bonus compensation with respect to any completed calendar year immediately preceding the date of termination; (ii) the product of the annual incentive bonus paid or payable for the year that includes the date of termination, based on attainment of applicable goals for the year, and a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days in the current year through the date of termination and the denominator of which is 365; and (iii) her then-current base salary for the lesser of the remainder of the term of her agreement or a period of 12 months. Ms. Headly’s entitlement to the foregoing severance payments is subject to her execution of a release and waiver of claims against the Company and its affiliates and her compliance with the restrictive covenants provided in her employment agreement.

Ms. Headly’s employment agreement contains restrictive covenants relating to the protection of confidential information, non-disclosure, non-competition and non-solicitation. The non-competition and non-solicitation covenants generally continue for a period of 12 months following the earlier of the expiration of the employment agreement or termination of employment.

Change in Control with Chief Operating Officer.  The Bank has entered into a change in control agreement with Mr. Register. Mr. Register’s change in control agreement provides for benefits if, within three years following a change in control, his employment by the Bank is terminated without “cause” or he resigns for “good reason” (as those terms are defined in the change in control agreement). In such cases, Mr. Register will receive (i) a cash amount equal to 2.99 times his highest annual compensation for the six month period prior to his termination; (ii) a cash amount equal to the actuarial equivalent of his retirement pension to which he would have been entitled to receive under the terms of such retirement plan or programs had he accumulated three additional years of continuous service after his termination at his base salary rate in effect on the date of his termination under such retirement plans or programs and reduced by the single sum actuarial equivalent of any amounts to which he is entitled; and (iii) continued participation in all of the employee benefit plans and programs that he was entitled to participate in prior to his termination for three years. If such participation is not possible, alternative coverage or cash equivalent will be provided or paid on a monthly basis. Upon a change in control, all outstanding stock options, if any,

89


Table of Contents

will vest and become fully exercisable. In the event of litigation to challenge, enforce or interpret the agreement that does not end in the Bank’s favor, The Bank will indemnify Mr. Register for reasonable attorneys’ fees and pay post-judgement interest on any money judgement.

Under the change in control agreement with Mr. Register, if the payments and benefits under the employment agreement, together with other payments and benefits Mr. Register has received or may have the right to receive, on account of a change in control would subject Mr. Register to the excise tax imposed under Section 4999 of the Code, then the payments and benefits shall be reduced by the Bank to the minimum extent necessary so that none of the payments or benefits are subject to the excise tax.

The term of Mr. Register’s change in control agreement automatically renews and is extended for three years following a change in control.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table summarizes the total compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 and the Company’s Chief Operating Officer for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Name and Principal Position

 

Year

 

Salary

 

 

Stock Awards

(1)

 

 

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation

(2)

 

 

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings

(3)

 

 

All Other Compensation

(4)

 

 

Total

 

Marc J. Bogan

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

2020

 

$

377,900

 

(5)

$

350,162

 

(6)

$

172,296

 

 

$

182,501

 

 

$

37,316

 

 

$

1,120,175

 

 

 

2019

 

$

327,500

 

 

$

114,610

 

 

$

124,216

 

 

$

162,331

 

 

$

33,277

 

 

$

761,934

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christine E. Headly

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

 

2020

 

$

200,000

 

 

$

49,987

 

 

$

84,506

 

 

$

39,573

 

 

$

21,572

 

 

$

395,638

 

 

 

2019

 

$

190,276

 

 

$

47,588

 

 

$

59,206

 

 

$

27,748

 

 

$

21,689

 

 

$

346,507

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chip S. Register

Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer

 

2020

 

$

236,501

 

(7)

$

148,667

 

(8)

$

84,506

 

 

$

12,471

 

 

$

26,669

 

 

$

508,814

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of equity awards in the year granted, in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For 2020, the awards included time-based restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units. Performance-based awards in the above table assume the probable outcome of performance conditions is equal to the target potential value of the awards. The assumptions made in the valuation of the stock awards are set forth in Note 12 to the Company’s audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 26, 2021.

(2)

The amounts in this column represent the amounts of cash incentive compensation earned for the years indicated.

(3)

The amounts in this column reflect the actuarial increase in the present value of the NEOs accumulated benefit under the Executive SERP, for Mr. Bogan and the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan agreement, for Ms. Headly and Mr. Register, determined using factors consistent with those used in the Company’s audited financial statements.

(4)

The amounts in this column consist of, for 2020 for Mr. Bogan, personal use of a company car of $3,849, a 401(k) Savings Plan company match of $17,100, a 401(k) Savings Plan employer contribution of $8,550, and $7,817 in cumulative dividends received during 2020 on restricted stock; for Ms. Headly, a health and welfare benefit of $200, a 401(k) Savings Plan company match of $11,939, a 401(k) Savings Plan employer contribution of $7,779, and $1,654 in cumulative dividends received during 2019 on restricted stock; and for Mr. Register, a 401(k) Savings Plan company match of $15,653, a 401(k) Savings Plan employer contribution of $7,940, and $3,076 in cumulative dividends received during 2020 on restricted stock.

(5)

Includes $45,400 paid on an accelerated basis for accrued but unused paid time off in connection with the proposed Merger of the Company and Virginia National.

(6)

Amount also includes $233,787 additional expense in 2020 related to the accelerated vesting of restricted stock awards and accelerated vesting and settlement of performance based restricted stock units in connection with the proposed merger of the Company and Virginia National.

(7)

Includes $21,501 paid on an accelerated basis for accrued but unused paid time off in connection with the proposed Merger of the Company and Virginia National.

(8)

Amount also includes $94,917 additional expense in 2020 related to the accelerated vesting of restricted stock awards and accelerated vesting and settlement of performance based restricted stock units in connection with the proposed merger of the Company and Virginia National.


90


Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at 2020 Fiscal Year-End

The following table includes certain information with respect to the value of all previously awarded unvested restricted stock awards held by the NEOs at December 31, 2020. Neither of the NEOs own any unexercised options.

 

 

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested

 

 

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (1)

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards:  Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested

 

 

Equity Incentive Plan Awards:  Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (1)

 

Marc J. Bogan

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

2,598

 

(7)

$

45,153

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christine E. Headly

 

 

1,193

 

(2)

$

20,734

 

 

 

1,193

 

(3)

$

20,734

 

 

 

 

1,097

 

(4)

$

19,066

 

 

 

1,097

 

(5)

$

19,066

 

 

 

 

1,030

 

(6)

$

17,901

 

 

 

1,030

 

(7)

$

17,901

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chip S. Register

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

$

-

 

 

 

955

 

(7)

$

16,598

 

(1)

The amounts in this column represent the number of shares of restricted stock held multiplied by the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $17.38 per share on December 31, 2020.

(2)

These shares of restricted stock were awarded on February 20, 2020 under the Stock Incentive Plan and vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date.

(3)

These restricted stock units were awarded on February 21, 2020 under the Stock Incentive Plan and will be earned on December 31, 2021 contingent on actual performance of predefined measures and subject to accelerated vesting upon the earlier occurrence of a change in control.  Each restricted stock unit is equivalent to one share of Company common stock.

(4)

These shares of restricted stock were awarded on February 21, 2019 under the Stock Incentive Plan and vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date.

(5)

These restricted stock units were awarded on February 21, 2019 under the Stock Incentive Plan and will be earned on December 31, 2021 contingent on actual performance of predefined measures and subject to accelerated vesting upon the earlier occurrence of a change in control.  Each restricted stock unit is equivalent to one share of Company common stock.

(6)

These shares of restricted stock were awarded on February 15, 2018 under the Stock Incentive Plan and vest in full on the third anniversary of the grant date.

(7)

These restricted stock units were awarded on February 15, 2018 under the Stock Incentive Plan and will be earned on December 31, 2020 contingent on actual performance of predefined measures. Each restricted stock unit is equivalent to one share of Company common stock.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Employment Agreements and Change in Control Agreement

For a description of the payments that may be made to the Company’s NEOs upon certain termination events or upon a change in control of the Company, see “—Employment Agreement with Chief Executive Officer,” “—Employment Agreement with Chief Financial Officer,” and “Change in Control Agreement with Chief Operating Officer” above.

Equity Awards. Our restricted stock grants normally vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, if the conditions with respect to the grants are met. In addition to any equity vesting provisions contained in the Company’s 2018 proxy statementemployment agreements we have with our NEOs, under the captions “Directors’ Compensation”terms of their restricted stock agreements, early vesting of their restricted stock occurs upon any of the following events (as defined in the Stock Incentive Plan): (i) the occurrence of a “change in control,” (ii) the executive’s death while an employee, (iii) the executive’s disability while an employee, (iv) the executive’s retirement, or (v) the termination of the executive’s employment by the Company or a subsidiary other than for “just cause” or “cause” under circumstances where the plan committee provides for special vesting rules or restrictions and “Executive Compensation”waives the otherwise applicable automatic forfeiture on cessation of employment.

Executive SERP. The benefits payable to (i) Mr. Bogan under the Executive SERP (ii) Ms. Headly under her Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement, and (iii) Mr. Register under his Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement upon termination are described under “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.”

91


Table of Contents

The following table shows the estimated payments for the NEOs upon the described termination events or upon a change in control of the Company, based on following assumptions and not taking into account the potential effects of the pending merger between the Company and Virginia National:

The table assumes each termination event or the change in control occurred on December 31, 2020, and assumes a stock price of $17.38 which was the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2020.

The amounts reflected in the following table are estimates, as the actual amounts to be paid to the NEO can only be determined at the time of termination or change in control.

In any case where a choice of payment is permitted, the table assumes all amounts were paid in a lump sum.

Except as noted in the table below, at termination, an NEO is entitled to receive all amounts accrued and vested under our 401(k) Savings Plan according to the same terms as other employees participating in those plans, whose benefits are not shown in the table below.

The NEO is entitled to receive amounts earned during the term of employment regardless of the manner in which the NEO’s employment is terminated. These amounts include base salary, unused vacation pay, and vested stock or option awards. These amounts are not shown in the table below.

Except as provided in their employment agreements, the NEO generally must be employed by the Company or the Bank on December 31, 2020 in order to receive any cash award under the Management Incentive Plan for 2020. In the event a termination occurs on an earlier date, the Committee has the discretion to award the employee an annual cash incentive under the plan. Discretionary annual cash compensation payments would not typically be awarded in the event of termination by the Company for cause or termination by the NEOs without good reason.

 

 

Termination with no Change in Control

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination with Change in Control

 

Benefits & Payments Upon Termination

 

Death

 

 

Disability (1)

 

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason

 

 

Termination for Cause or Resignation without Good Reason

 

 

Retirement

 

 

Change in Control with or without Termination (2)

 

 

Death

 

 

Disability

 

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (3)

 

 

Termination for Cause or Resignation without Good Reason

 

 

Resignation for Other than Good Reason including Retirement

 

Marc J. Bogan

President & Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary

$

 

83,125

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

Long-Term Incentive:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Vesting

 

 

99,031

 

 

 

99,031

 

 

 

99,031

 

 

 

 

 

 

99,031

 

 

 

99,031

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits & Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary Continuation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

665,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,509,340

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonus Continuation

 

 

172,296

 

 

 

172,296

 

 

 

172,296

 

 

 

 

 

 

172,296

 

 

 

 

 

 

172,296

 

 

 

172,296

 

 

 

172,296

 

 

 

 

 

 

172,296

 

Health & Welfare Coverage (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

223

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

223

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Disability

 

 

 

 

 

195

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

195

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid Time Off

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SERP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

811,946

 

 

 

811,946

 

 

 

811,946

 

 

 

 

 

 

811,946

 

Total Value

$

 

354,452

 

$

 

271,522

 

$

 

936,550

 

$

 

 

$

 

271,327

 

$

 

99,031

 

$

 

984,242

 

$

 

984,437

 

$

 

2,493,805

 

$

 

 

$

 

984,242

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

92


Table of Contents

 

 

Termination with no Change in Control

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination with Change in Control

 

Benefits & Payments Upon Termination

 

Death

 

 

Disability (1)

 

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason

 

 

Termination for Cause or Resignation without Good Reason

 

 

Retirement

 

 

Change in Control with or without Termination (2)

 

 

Death

 

 

Disability

 

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (3)

 

 

Termination for Cause or Resignation without Good Reason

 

 

Resignation for Other than Good Reason including Retirement

 

Christine E. Headly

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary

$

 

50,000

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

Long-Term Incentive:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Vesting

 

 

135,269

 

 

 

135,269

 

 

 

135,269

 

 

 

 

 

 

135,269

 

 

 

135,269

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits & Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary Continuation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonus Continuation

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Health & Welfare Coverage (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

200

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Disability

 

 

 

 

 

43

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid Time Off

 

 

32,308

 

 

 

32,308

 

 

 

32,308

 

 

 

32,308

 

 

 

32,308

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SERP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Value

$

 

302,083

 

$

 

252,126

 

$

 

452,282

 

$

 

32,308

 

$

 

252,083

 

$

 

135,269

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination with no Change in Control

 

 

 

 

 

 

Termination with Change in Control

 

Benefits & Payments Upon Termination

 

Death

 

 

Disability (1)

 

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason

 

 

Termination for Cause or Resignation without Good Reason

 

 

Retirement

 

 

Change in Control with or without Termination (2)

 

 

Death

 

 

Disability

 

 

Termination without Cause or Resignation for Good Reason (3)

 

 

Termination for Cause or Resignation without Good Reason

 

 

Resignation for Other than Good Reason including Retirement

 

Chip S. Register

Executive Vice President & Chief Operating Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

Long-Term Incentive:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Restricted Stock Vesting

 

 

35,073

 

 

 

35,073

 

 

 

35,073

 

 

 

 

 

 

35,073

 

 

 

35,073

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits & Perquisites:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary Continuation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

895,523

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonus Continuation

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

84,506

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Health & Welfare Coverage (4)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Disability

 

 

 

 

 

47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paid Time Off

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retirement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

58,050

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SERP

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7,615

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Value

$

 

119,579

 

$

 

119,626

 

$

 

119,579

 

$

 

 

$

 

119,579

 

$

 

35,073

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

$

 

1,045,694

 

$

 

 

$

 

 

(1)

Assumes disability continues through retirement age of 65.

(2)

These benefits are received upon a change in control whether or not the NEO is terminated in connection with the change in control.

(3)

These amounts may be reduced in order to avoid excess parachute payments under Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code, in accordance with the executive’s agreement.

(4)

Represents the difference between the NEO’s premium payments and the Company’s premium payments for continued health and welfare coverage.

Compensation of Directors

Retainer and Meeting Fees. Each non-employee director received an annual retainer of $5,000 for board service during 2020. Non-employee directors of The Fauquier Bank received an annual retainer of $5,000 for The Fauquier Bank board service during 2020. The chairman received a retainer from the Company of $29,500 during 2020, but did not receive a retainer from The Fauquier Bank. Annual retainers are pro-rated at one half for any director who does not serve after an annual meeting of shareholders. For 2020, all board meetings were joint meetings of Fauquier and The Fauquier Bank, and the fee paid to non-employee directors was $800 per meeting. Non-employee

93


Table of Contents

directors of the Company and The Fauquier Bank received committee fees of $300 for each committee meeting attended. Committee chairmen for the audit, compensation and benefits, and enterprise risk management committees received $800 for each committee meeting they chaired. Committee chairmen for the governance and nominating committees received $400 for each committee meeting they chaired. The chairman of the Company receives a committee fee only if he chairs the committee.

Equity Compensation. During 2020, the Company granted restricted stock to non-employee directors under the Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by shareholders at Fauquier’s 2019 annual meeting. The number of shares of restricted stock granted to each director was calculated by dividing $10,000 by the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the day prior to the day the compensation and benefits committee made the grant determination.

The compensation and benefits committee believes that granting restricted stock as part of director compensation better aligns the directors’ and shareholders’ long-term interest in a way that cannot be accomplished through cash compensation, and increases director ownership of the Company’s shares in an appropriate manner. On February 20, 2020, 477 shares of restricted stock were awarded to each non-employee director continuing in office after the 2020 annual meeting. The shares automatically vested on such date but are subject to transferability restrictions that lapse on the third anniversary of the grant date.  On February 1, 2021, 539 shares of restricted stock were awarded to each non-employee director.  The shares automatically vested on such date but are subject to transferability restrictions that lapse on the third anniversary of the grant date or, for any director that does not serve on the Board of Directors of Virginia National following the effectiveness of the Merger, that lapse upon the effectiveness of the Merger.

The following table provides compensation information for the year ended December 31, 2020 for each non-employee director.  Mr. Bogan is incorporated herein by reference.an employee director and does not receive separate compensation for serving on the Board.

Name

 

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash (1)

 

 

Stock Awards (2)

 

 

Total

 

John B. Adams, Jr.

 

$

40,367

 

 

$

9,993

 

 

$

50,360

 

Kevin T. Carter

 

 

27,300

 

 

 

9,993

 

 

 

37,293

 

Donna D. Flory

 

 

28,800

 

 

 

9,993

 

 

 

38,793

 

Randolph D. Frostick

 

 

31,500

 

 

 

9,993

 

 

 

41,493

 

Jay B. Keyser

 

 

34,600

 

 

 

9,993

 

 

 

44,593

 

Randolph T. Minter

 

 

31,300

 

 

 

9,993

 

 

 

41,293

 

Brian S. Montgomery

 

 

32,100

 

 

 

9,993

 

 

 

42,093

 

P. Kurtis Rodgers

 

 

34,200

 

 

 

9,993

 

 

 

44,193

 

Sterling T. Strange, III

 

 

31,800

 

 

 

9,993

 

 

 

41,793

 

(1)

Because each director also serves on The Fauquier Bank’s board of directors, the amounts reported in this table reflect compensation for board services paid by the Company and The Fauquier Bank.  


(2)

Reflects the grant date fair value of the restricted stock award granted to each non-employee director on February 20, 2020 under the Company’s stock incentive plan calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Beneficial Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers, and Principal Shareholders of the Company

The information regardingCompany has a Stock Ownership Policy which requires all directors to acquire within five years of becoming a director and retain a minimum of 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The policy requires that within five years of being named executive officers, the Chief Executive Officer must retain a minimum of 25,000 shares and other NEOs must retain a minimum of 15,000 shares of common stock.

For purposes of the following tables, beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with the provisions of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 under which, in general, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if the person has or shares the power to vote or direct the voting of the security or the power to dispose of or direct the disposition of the security, or if the person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership required by this item is containedof the security within 60 days. All shares of common stock indicated in the Company’s 2018 proxy statement underbelow tables are subject to the caption “Security Ownershipsole investment and voting power of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management,” and is incorporated herein by reference.


59
the identified person except as otherwise set forth in the footnotes, except that shares of restricted stock over which an individual has sole voting power but does not have investment power until transferability restrictions have lapsed, are not specifically identified.

94


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth, as of March 1, 2021, the number and percentage of shares of Company common stock held by each director and nominee for director of the Company, each of the NEOs and all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group.

Name of Beneficial Owner(s)

 

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

 

 

Percent of Class

 

John B. Adams, Jr.

 

 

26,078

 

 

*

 

Marc J. Bogan

 

 

22,026

 

 

*

 

Kevin T. Carter

 

 

6,276

 

(1)

*

 

Donna D. Flory

 

 

5,908

 

(2)

*

 

Randolph D. Frostick

 

 

9,115

 

 

*

 

Christine E. Headly

 

 

8,985

 

(3)

*

 

Jay B. Keyser

 

 

9,875

 

(4)

*

 

Randolph T. Minter

 

 

39,848

 

 

1.05%

 

Brian S. Montgomery

 

 

41,136

 

(5)

1.08%

 

Chip S. Register

 

 

9,838

 

 

*

 

P. Kurtis Rodgers

 

 

12,345

 

 

*

 

Sterling T. Strange, III

 

 

8,524

 

 

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

All directors and executive officers as a group (12 persons)

 

 

199,954

 

 

5.25%

 

*

Percentage ownership is less than one percent of the outstanding shares of common stock.

(1)

Includes 2,724 shares held jointly with spouse, over which Mr. Carter shares voting and investment power.

(2)

Includes 3,965 shares held jointly with spouse, over which Ms. Flory shares voting and investment power.

(3)

Includes (i) 657 shares held jointly with spouse, over which Ms. Headly shares voting and investment power; and (ii) 2,290 shares that are restricted stock holdings. The restricted shares are subject to a vesting schedule, forfeiture risk and other restrictions.

(4)

Includes 8,398 shares held in the Jay B. Keyser Revocable Trust, over which Mr. Keyser shares voting and investment power with spouse.

(5)

Includes 10,376 shares held jointly with spouse, over which Mr. Montgomery shares voting and investment power.

The following table sets forth, as of March 1, 2021, the number and percentage of shares of Company common stock beneficially held by persons known by the Company to be the owners of more than 5% of the Company’s common stock.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner

Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership

Percent of Class

Royce & Associates, LLC

745 Fifth Avenue

New York, NY 10151

294,000 (1)

7.72%

Ategra Community Financial Institution Fund, L.P.

Jonathan Holtaway                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          8229 Boone Blvd., Suite 305

Vienna, VA 22182

351,331 (2)

9.23%

Daniel R. Long, III, CFA

588 Eagle Watch Lane

Osprey, FL 34229

257,549 (3)

6.76%

(1)

Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 21, 2021 by Royce & Associates, LLC (“Royce”). Pursuant to the Schedule 13G/A, as of December 31, 2020, Royce was the beneficial owner of 294,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and had sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to all 294,000 shares.

(2)

Based on a Schedule 13D filed with the SEC on January 29, 2021 by (i) Ategra Community Financial Institution Fund, L.P. (“ACFIF”), (ii) Ategra GP, LLC (“AGP”), (iii) Ategra Capital Management, LLC (“ACM”), (iv) Jonathan Holtaway, and (v) Jacques Rebibo. Pursuant to the Schedule 13D, as of January 29, 2021, ACFIF, AGP, ACM and Mr. Holtaway were each the beneficial owners of 349,331 shares of the Company’s common stock and had shared voting power and shared investment power with respect to all 349,331 shares. The Schedule 13D also states that, as of such date, Jacques Rebibo was the beneficial owner of 351,331 shares of the Company’s common stock, had sole voting and sole investment power with respect to 2,000 shares, and had shared voting power and shared investment power with respect to 349,331 shares.

95


Table of Contents

(3)

Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on October 9, 2019 by Daniel R. Long, III, CFA. Pursuant to the Schedule 13D/A, as of October 8, 2019, Mr. Long was the beneficial owner of 257,549 shares of the Company’s common stock and had sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to 252,549 shares and only investment power with respect to certain other shares held by family members of Mr. Long.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 20172020 with respect to compensation plans under which equity securities of the Company are authorized for issuance:

Plan Category

 

Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)

 

 

Weighted–average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b)

 

 

Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))

 

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

 

17,705

 

(1)

$

20.05

 

 

 

66,553

 

 

Total

 

 

17,705

 

 

$

20.05

 

 

 

66,553

 

 


Plan Category 
Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights (a)
  
Weighted–average
exercise price
of outstanding
options, warrants
and rights (b)
  
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders  18,062
(1) 
 $16.58   151,174
(2) 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders          
Total  18,062  $16.58   151,174 

(1)

Consists of shares underlying performance-based stock rightsunits that were granted under the Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan approved by shareholders on May 19, 2009.21, 2019.

(2)Consists of 350,000 shares available to be granted in the form of options, restricted stock or stock appreciation rights under the Stock Incentive Plan approved by shareholders on May 19, 2009.

For additional information concerning the material features of the Company’s equity compensation plans please seerefer to Note 12 of the Company'sCompany’s Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.


Information required by this item

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Pursuant to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, all directors (including our NEOs) are prohibited from being a consultant to (excluding an attorney), a director, officer, or employee of, or otherwise operate, another bank or financial institution that markets products or services in competition with the Bank. Our Chief Executive Officer implements our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and is containedresponsible for overseeing compliance with the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

The Bank has had, and may be expected to have in the Company’s 2018 proxy statement underfuture, banking transactions in the captions “Meetingsordinary course of business with executive officers, directors, their immediate families and Committeesaffiliated companies in which they are principal shareholders. Such loans were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms, including interest rate and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with other persons and did not involve more than the normal risk of collectibility or present other unfavorable features.

Independence of the Directors

A majority of the directors are “independent directors” as defined by the listing standards of the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC and the Board has determined that these independent directors have no relationships with the Company that would interfere with the exercise of Directors”their independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The independent directors are Messrs. Adams, Carter, Frostick, Keyser, Minter, Montgomery, Rodgers, Strange and “Related Party Transactions,”Ms. Flory. In determining the independence of the directors, the Board considered that Vanderpool, Frostick and Nishanian, P.C., a law firm of which Mr. Frostick is incorporated hereina partner and shareholder, has been engaged by reference.


The Fauquier Bank for legal services. During 2020, the firm was paid $16,520 for its services. After considering this relationship, the Board concluded that Mr. Frostick is independent.


96


Table of Contents

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Brown Edwards, billed the following fees for services provided to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2020

 

 

2019

 

Audit fees (1)

$

96,904

 

 

$

101,813

 

Audit-related fees (2)

 

27,700

 

 

 

26,000

 

Tax fees

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

All other fees

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Total

$

124,604

 

 

$

127,813

 

(1)

Audit fees consist of audit and review services, consents and review of documents filed with the SEC. For 2019, audit fees also include an attestation report on internal controls under SEC rules.

Information required by this item is contained in

(2)

Audit-related fees consist of employee benefit plan audits, Housing and Urban Development audits, and audits of the Federal Family Education Loan Program.

Pre-Approval Policies

Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s 2018 proxy statement underAudit Committee Charter, the captions “Principal Accountant Fees”Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, compensation and “Pre-Approval Policies,”oversight of the work performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee, or a designated member of the Audit Committee, must pre-approve all audit (including audit-related) and non-audit services performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm in order to assure that the provisions of such services does not impair the accountants’ independence. The Audit Committee has delegated interim pre-approval authority to Mr. Keyser, Chairman of the Audit Committee. Any interim pre-approval of permitted non-audit services is incorporated hereinrequired to be reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee does not delegate its responsibilities to pre-approve services performed by reference.


the independent registered public accounting firm to management.

97


Table of Contents

PART IV


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)

(1) and (2).  The response to this portion of Item 15 is submitted as a separate section of this report.


(a)

(3) Exhibits


The following exhibits are filed as part of this Form 10-K and this list includes the Exhibit Index.

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit

Description

3.1

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Reorganization, dated as of October 1, 2020, between Virginia National Bankshares Corporation and Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed on October 2, 2020.

3.1

Articles of Incorporation of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., as amended,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K filed March 15, 2010.

3.2

Bylaws of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., as amended and restated,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Form 8-K filed MarchApril 20, 2018.2020.

10.1

4.1

Description of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2000, incorporated’s Securities, incorporate by reference to Exhibit 4.B4.1 to Form S-810-K filed October 15, 2002.March 6, 2020.

10.1.1

10.1

Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for Employee, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.1 to Form 8-K filed February 16, 2005.

10.1.2

Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement for Non-Employee Director, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.2 to Form 8-K filed February 16, 2005.

10.2
Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Director Deferred Compensation Plan, as adopted effective May 1, 1995,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.C to Form S-8 filed October 15, 2002.

10.3

10.2*

Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on May 21, 2019, filed on April 12, 2019).

10.3*

Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.0 to Form S-8 filed August 21, 2009.

10.3.1

10.3.1*

Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement relating to Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.1 to Form 10-K filed March 15, 2010.

10.3.2

10.3.2*

Form of Nonstatutory Stock Option Agreement relating to Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.2 to Form 10-K filed March 15, 2010.

10.3.3

10.3.3*

Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement relating to Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4.3 to Form 10-K filed March 15, 2010.

10.4

10.4*

Employment Agreement, dated June 6, 2016, between Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., The Fauquier Bank, and Marc J. Bogan,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Form 8-K/A filed June 7, 2016.

10.5

10.5*

Employment Agreement, dated February 8, 2017, between Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., The Fauquier Bank, and Christine E. Headly,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Form 8-K/A filed February 13, 2017.

10.6

10.6*

Employment Agreement, dated August 18, 2016, between Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., The Fauquier Bank, and T. Michael York, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to Form 8-K/A filed August 19, 2016.

10.7

Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated October 21, 2010,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2010.

10.7.1

10.6.1*

Form of Participation Agreement for Fauquier Bankshares, Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15.1 to Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2010.

14

10.7*

Employment Agreement, dated August 1, 2020, by and between Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., The Fauquier Bank and Christine E. Headly, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed August 4, 2020.

14

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics,, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to Form 10-Q10-K filed AugustMarch 11, 2006.2019.

21

Subsidiaries of the Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Part I of this Form 10-K.

Consent of Brown, Edwards & Company, L.L.P.

31.1

Consent of Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC.

Certification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

Certification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a).

Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

101

99.1

Form of Affiliate Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2020, by and among Virginia National Bankshares Corporation, Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., and certain shareholders of Fauquier Bankshares, Inc, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Form 8-K filed October 2, 2020.

98


Table of Contents

99.2

Form of Affiliate Agreement, dated as of September 30, 2020, by and among Virginia National Bankshares Corporation, Fauquier Bankshares, Inc., and certain shareholders of Virginia National Bankshares Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K filed October 2, 2020.

101

The following materials from the Company’s 10-K Report for the period ended December 31, 2017,2020, formatted in inline XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

104

The cover page from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, formatted in Inline eXtensible Business Reporting Language (included with Exhibit 101).

*Indicates management contract


ITEM 16. 10-K SUMMARY

None.


99


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FAUQUIER BANKSHARES, INC.
(Registrant)

By:

FAUQUIER BANKSHARES, INC.

(Registrant)

By:

/s/ Marc J. Bogan

Marc J. Bogan

President & Chief Executive Officer

Dated:  March 29, 2018

26, 2021

By:

/s/ Christine E. Headly

Christine E. Headly

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

Dated:  March 29, 2018

26, 2021


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


SIGNATURE

TITLE

DATE

/s/ John B. Adams, Jr.

Chairman, Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

John B. Adams, Jr.

/s/ Randolph T. Minter

Vice Chairman, Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Randolph T. Minter

/s/ Marc J. Bogan

President & Chief Executive Officer, Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Marc J. Bogan

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Christine E. Headly

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Christine E. Headly

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ Kevin T. Carter

Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Kevin T. Carter

/s/ Donna D. Flory

Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Donna D. Flory

/s/ Randolph D. Frostick

Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Randolph D. Frostick

/s/ Jay B. Keyser

Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Jay B. Keyser

/s/ Brian S. Montgomery

Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Brian S. Montgomery

/s/ P. Kurt Rodgers

Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

P. Kurt Rodgers

/s/ Sterling T. Strange III

Director

March 29, 2018

26, 2021

Sterling T. Strange III


62

100