Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Large accelerated filer | ☒☐ | | Accelerated filer | ☐☒ | | Emerging growth company | ☐ |
| Non-accelerated filer | ☐ | | Smaller reporting company | ☐ | | | |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐No ☒
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2019July 3, 2022 was $887,999,502.$325,084,278. The registrant does not have any non-voting common equity.
As of March 2, 2020,10, 2023, there were 19,920,23020,365,293 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III incorporates by reference certain portions of the information from the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 7, 2020. The definitive Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the registrant’s year ended December 31, 2019.
Table of Contents
| | | | | | | | |
| | Page
Number |
| Part I | |
| Item 1 | | |
Part I | |
Item 11A | | |
Item 1A1B | | |
Item 1B2 | | |
Item 23 | | |
Item 34 | | |
Item 4 | | |
| Part II | |
Part II | |
| Item 5 | | |
| Item 6 | | |
| Item 7 | | |
| Item 7A | | |
| Item 8 | | |
| Item 9 | | |
| Item 9A | | |
| Item 9B | | |
| Item 9C | | |
Part III | |
| Part III | |
| Item 10 | | |
| Item 11 | | |
| Item 12 | | |
| Item 13 | | |
| Item 14 | | |
| |
| Part IV | |
| Item 15 | | |
| Item 16 | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
Part I
Item 1. Business
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains certain statements that are “forward-looking statements” as that term is defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). The words “may,” “hope,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” “continue,” and other expressions which are predictions of or indicate future events and trends and which do not relate to historical matters, identify forward-looking statements. We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our stockholders, and we, therefore, make forward-looking statements in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Act. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or control and our actual results may differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements, including statements about our future performance, including realizationthe potential outcome, if any, of cost reductionsthe Board of Director's review of strategic alternatives; the expected and potential direct and indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business, our ability to remediate the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, the number of new product launches and future cash flows from restructuringoperating activities, and expected synergies, involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, changes in the priceduration and scope of and demand for oil and gas in both domestic and international markets, our ability to successfully integrate acquired businesses, as contemplated, our ability to successfully implement our divestiture, restructuring or simplification strategies, the possibility that expected benefits related to the Fluid Handling acquisition may not materialize as expected,COVID-19 pandemic; any adverse changes in governmental policies or laws, including tax laws; variability of raw material and component pricing,pricing; changes in our suppliers’ performance,performance; fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates,rates; changes in tariffs or other taxes related to doing business internationally,internationally; our ability to hire and retain key personnel,personnel; our ability to operate our manufacturing facilities at efficient levels, including our ability to prevent cost overruns and reduce costs,costs; supply chain disruptions; our ability to generate increased cash by reducing our working capital,capital; our prevention of the accumulation of excess inventory, fluctuationsinventory; increases in interest rates,rates; our ability to successfully defend product liability actions, any actions of stockholdersactions; the inability to identify or others in response tocomplete a strategic transaction; the expiration of the recent unsolicited tender offer and the costcurrent highly inflationary environment; volatility and disruption of responding to those actions,in the capital markets; as well as the uncertainty associated with the current worldwide economic conditions and the continuing impact on economic and financial conditions in the United States and around the world, including as a result of health pandemics,the current recessionary environment, COVID-19 pandemic, natural disasters, military conflicts, terrorist attacks current Middle Eastern conflicts and relatedsimilar matters. For a discussion of these risks, uncertainties and other factors, see Part I, Item 1A, "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.otherwise, except as required by law.
Overview
CIRCOR International, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of Delaware on July 1, 1999. As used in this report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” and “CIRCOR” mean CIRCOR International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (unless the context indicates another meaning). The term “common stock” means our common stock, par value $0.01 per share.
We design, manufactureCIRCOR designs, manufactures and marketmarkets differentiated technology products and sub-systems for markets includingthe industrial and aerospace and defense and energy. CIRCOR hasmarkets. We have a diversified flow and motion control product portfolio with recognized, market-leading brands that fulfill itsour customers’ mission critical and severe service needs. The Company’s strategy is to grow organically through innovative product development, aftermarket growth, penetrating new regions, and through complementary acquisitions; simplify CIRCOR’s operations, including through dispositions of non-core assets;leveraging core technologies into growth markets like hydrogen, medical and space; achieve world class operational excellence; and attractbuild an inclusive, growth-oriented culture that attracts and retain top industryretains a diverse group of talent. We have a global presence and operate 2518 major manufacturing facilities that are located in North America, Western Europe, Morocco, China and India. The Company has the following reportable business segments: Industrial segment (“Industrial segment”Industrial”), and Aerospace & Defense segment (“Aerospace & Defense segment”), and Energy ("Energy segment"Defense” or "Energy""A&D"). We sell our products through distributors, representatives, Engineering, Procurement and Construction ("EPC") companies, as well as directly to end-user customers and original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”)., as well as through Engineering, Procurement and Construction (“EPC”) companies and our channel partner network.
In 2019,2020, we completed the divestiture of our Engineered Valves ("EV") business and announced our intent to sell ourloss-making Distributed Valves ("DV"(“DV”) business. These actionsThis action stemmed from our strategic decision to exit the upstream oil and gas valves market, which was a strategic shift formarket. This business and the Company. As a result, these businesses are both accounted for asassociated loss on disposal were reported within discontinued operations in our consolidated financial statements. The following discussion in this Item 1 relates only to our continuing operations unless otherwise noted. Refer to Note 1, Description of Business along with Note 3, Discontinued Operations, and Assets Held for Sale, to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for additional information.
As previously announced in March 2022, our Board of Directors has initiated a full review of all potential strategic alternatives available to the Company to enhance value for stockholders including, but not limited to, a possible sale of some or all of our assets (whether in whole or in parts), merger, divestiture or other strategic transaction. The Company has not set a timetable for completion of the review, may suspend or terminate the review at any time and does not intend to make further announcements regarding the process unless and until our Board of Directors approves a course of action for which further disclosure is required or appropriate. The exploration of strategic alternatives may not result in any transaction or strategic change. The discussion of our business strategies below reflects our short-term and long-term strategies without giving effect to the strategic review process.
Strategies
Our objective is to enhance shareholderstockholder value by focusing on organic growth, margin expansion, strongimproving free cash flow (a non-GAAP financial measure) and disciplined capital deployment. We have a four-pointreducing leverage. Our strategy to achieve these objectives.objectives is to:
1) Grow Organically and Through AcquisitionsBuild the best team. We leverage the power of our global design capabilitiesare committed to develop innovative productscreating a strong employee value proposition that solve our customers’ mostattracts talented and diverse people to CIRCOR. We are also committed to investing in, engaging, challenging and developing our employees through a variety of development programs. Our goal is to build an inclusive, growth-oriented culture that, when combined with robust process, appropriate metrics, and individual accountability, will deliver extraordinary results.
2) Drive organic growth. We serve mission critical problems. New products will be an increasingly important partapplications across our A&D and Industrial portfolio, and typically enjoy competitive position in the market segments we serve. One of the pillars of our growth strategy going forward.is customer intimacy. Strong insights into the needs of our current and prospective customers enable us to drive growth through new products, aftermarket support, value-based pricing and enhanced customer experience from order through delivery. We view aftermarket as key to both organic growth and margin expansion and we will continue exploring support opportunities for our customers, especially those in our Industrial segment. In A&D, our businesses are well positioned for growth from critical programs such as Navy submarines, missiles including hypersonic, fighter aircraft and narrowbody and widebody commercial aircraft platforms. In addition, we are positioning ourselves to grow in partsfinding use of our endtechnologies in new markets where our products are under-represented. This could include establishing a presenceincluding medical, hydrogen and space applications. We will continue to invest in higher growth geographiesnew technologies and new programs where we have a limited presence today. It also could include taking products established in one end-market and selling those solutions into other relevant end markets.can leverage our unique technical advantages.
In addition to organic growth, we expect to acquire businesses over time. We are primarily focused on companies with differentiated technologies in complementary markets that we already understand and where we expect substantial growth. In addition to strategic fit and differentiated technology, the main criterion for an acquisition is return on invested capital.
2)3) Simplify CIRCORRealize margin expansion.. In 2013, we embarked on a long-term journey to simplify CIRCOR. We have a large numbersuccessful track record of facilities relative to our size and believe that simplifying this structure will not only expand ourexpanding margins by reducing cost, but will help us improve our customer service, operations, and controls. We obtain an in depth understanding of our customer needs and competitor capabilities in our end markets,A&D segment and continue to build on this success through value-based pricing, volume growth and the leverage of our best-cost manufacturing operations in Morocco. In Industrial, we are implementing similar strategies to those that have been successful in A&D, including value-based pricing, focus on the aftermarket, leverage of best-cost manufacturing in India and China, as well as factory modernization and 80/20 simplification.
4) Optimize overhead cost. We continue to evaluate our cost structure across the organization. We are continuously looking for opportunities to simplify our product portfoliostructure, eliminate redundancies and align our teams closer to the numbercustomers. These initiatives resulted in structural cost-out during 2022 and we have identified specific areas of unique productsopportunities for further improvements which we offer in the marketplace through active product management. During 2019, our simplification strategy shifted to include the exit of upstream oil and gas businesses.are currently evaluating for future implementation.
3)5) Achieve World Class Operational Excellenceworld class operational excellence. Our Global Operations and Supply Chain organization is fullybusinesses are committed to achieving operational excellence in support of our customers’ expectations of perfecthigh quality, on-time delivery and market competitiveness. We follow the CIRCOR Operating System ("COS"(“COS”), which creates a disciplined culture of continuous improvement for driving operational excellence including a sales and inventory operations plan that provides for world-class quality and delivery while maintaining an optimal level of working capital.excellence. COS is comprised of ten business process attributes designed to engage and empower our employees to recognize and eliminate waste, work real-time problem solving as part of their everyday job experience, and enhance our performance both in operations and business officefront end processes. Under the COS, our employees participate in a regimented training program and receive regular prescriptive assessments / action plans to drive process maturity. Quantitative performance metrics define site certification levels to help attain and sustain a high level of quality, productivity, inventory management and market competitiveness that delights our customers, shareholders,stockholders, and employees.
4)6) Build the Best TeamFocused capital deployment. Finally, weWe have a fundamental belief at CIRCOR thatportfolio of leading brands, differentiated technologies and strong customer relationships. We continually evaluate whether we are the best team wins. We are committed to attracting the most talented people inowners of our industrybusinesses, or whether we could undertake value enhancing divestitures. Although, our markets remain fragmented, and we are committed to investing, engaging, challengingsee opportunity for complementary and developingvalue enhancing acquisitions, in the near term our employees. We believe the best people combined with robust process, appropriate metrics,focus is on organic investments, evaluating divestitures and individual accountability will deliver extraordinary results.reducing leverage.
Business Segments
Industrial
Industrial is a global portfolio of highly engineered and differentiated fluid handling and flow control products.solutions. Our primary products are positive displacement pumps, specialty centrifugal pumps, metering pumps, automatic recirculating valves, and control valves and harsh environment flow control products for steam and cryogenicmission critical applications.
Our technology is focused on moving the most difficult fluids with extremely high efficiency for critical applications in the general industrial, power and process, oil & gas,energy, and commercial marine end markets.
We plan to grow the Industrial segment by expandingimproving our shareunderstanding of our customers and their challenges and providing innovative new products, including digitally enabled products, in existing markets with innovative solutionsmultiple product lines that address our customers' severe service and mission critical needs. We are driving growth regionally and developing products in-region, for-region. We are using multiple digital tools, including a new product offeringsCIRCOR app, to support our customers in the aftermarket. The Industrial segment is also focused on pricing initiatives to drive value-pricing for our products. We have achieved significant margin expansion in our Industrial segment in 2022 and believe that we have more opportunities for margin expansion through our strong salesvalue pricing strategy, simplification, factory modernization and service network,best cost country sourcing and leveraging our brand and commercial position.manufacturing.
Industrial is headquartered in Radolfzell, Germany, with primary manufacturing centers in North America, England, Germany, India, and China.
Markets and Applications
Industrial serves the general industrial, commercial marine, oil & gas, and power and process, energy and commercial marine markets.
•The general industrial market includes a broad range of manufacturing operations for flow and energy control. Our products are used to handle viscousfluids with a wide range of viscosity, lubricity, temperature, pressure and critical fluids,flow requirements, automate and control plant utilities, increase energy efficiency in buildings and campuses, and safely regulate critical fluids such as steam and industrial gases and cryogenic fluids used in manufacturing processes.
•The power and process market is comprised of electric utilities, industrial power producers and OEM power generating equipment providers. Our products and services are used across this segment in lubrication management for turbines and generators, as well as fuel delivery, heat transfer, and emissions reduction applications. We serve power generation facilities and processes fueled by natural gas, oil, hydro, solar, nuclear, and coal.
•The energy markets we serve are primarily midstream and downstream oil & gas, market is divided into three sub-segments: upstream, midstream, and downstream.as well as renewables. In midstream, our products and services are used in the transfer of oils and refined products via pipelines, ship vessels, railcars, and trucks. Our products and services are also used to manage and maintain storage terminals. In downstream, our products are used to support critical refining processes, both directly in the process and as part of integrated equipment supplied by OEMs. In 2019, we initiated a strategic shift away from upstream.Our products are also used in the production and management of biofuels and supporting the operation of large-scale wind farms.
•The commercial marine market includes shipbuilders, OEM suppliers of onboard equipment, and shipping fleet operators. Our products and services are designed specifically to support all aspects of fluid systems, including propulsion, ballast handling, cooling water, bilge, fuel, power generation, and mechanical hydraulics.
•In all of the markets we serve, we provide aftermarket components and in limited applications, aftermarket services.
Brands
Industrial manufactures and markets products and services through the following brands:
Allweiler, DeltaValve, Houttuin, IMO Pump, IMO AB, Leslie Controls, CPC Cryolab RG Lawrence, Rockwood Swendemann, RTK, Schroedahl, TapcoEnpro, Tushaco, and Zenith.
Products
Industrial offers a range of fluid handlingflow control products and services, including:
•3 Screw Pumps
•2 Screw Pumps
•Progressing Cavity Pumps
•Specialty Centrifugal Pumps
•Gear Metering Pumps
•Automatic Recirculation Valves
•Highly engineered valves, top and bottom unheading devices and center feed devices for refinery coking and Fluidized Catalytic Cracking Units (FCCU) operations
•Severe Service and General Service Control Valves
Our products must comply with certification standards applicable to many of our end markets. These standards include but are not limited to ISO 9001:2008, ANSI/ASQC Q 9001, API 676, and Mil-I-45208.
Customers
Industrial's products and services are sold directly to end-users, OEMs that supply specialized systems in their respective end markets, and EPC companies and through a global network of direct and indirect sales channels.
Revenue and Backlog
Industrial accounted for $450.7$504.2 million, $487.6$506.1 million, and $139.1$499.2 million or 47%64%, 48%67%, and 28%65% of our net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017. Industrial backlog as of January 31, 2020, was $157.2 million compared with $168.2 million as of January 31, 2019. Industrial backlog represents backlog orders we believe to be firm.respectively.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense is adesigns and produces diversified and innovative flow and motion control technology platform.products. Our primary product focus areas are valves, pumps, actuation,electric motors, kinetic switches, and high pressure pneumatic systems.
regulators and subsystems, and various ElectroMechanical assemblies. Aerospace & Defense products are mainly used in commercial aerospace, defense aerospace, Navy ships and submarines and general industrial markets.
We plan to grow Aerospace & Defense by increasing market share in existing and new markets through exceptional sales and customer service and with new products enabled by innovative, reliable and high qualityhigh-quality solutions. Product portfolio expansion through acquisitions of differentiated technologies in current and adjacent applications is also aA key part of our strategy is to leverage our core product technologies and technical capabilities to drive growth strategy.in new markets such as hydrogen transportation and dispensing, medical equipment, space, and hypersonic missiles. We are focused on capturing new business on new and existing platforms by providing innovative and best value solutions to our customers. We are also continuing to leverage our large installed base and our value-based strategy to drive growth and margin expansion from our aftermarket. We are also leveraging our manufacturing footprint in Morocco and sourcing initiatives in best cost countries to support our growth strategy and margin expansion on high value programs.
We have Aerospace & Defense facilities in North America, the United Kingdom, France, Morocco, and India. Our Aerospace & Defense headquarters is in Corona, California.
Markets and Applications
Aerospace & Defense serves the aerospace and defense markets.
•The aerospace market that we serve includes commercial aerospace primarily focused on systemssubsystems and components on airlinerscommercial aircraft and business jets, such as hydraulic, pneumatic, fuel and ground support equipmentElectroMechanical components including maintenance, repair and overhaul (MRO). In addition, we serve the defense aerospace market, including military and naval applications where controls or motion switches are mission critical. We support fixed wing aircraft, rotorcraft, missile systems, ground vehicles, submarines, weapon systems and weapon launch systems, ordinance, fire control, fuel systems, pneumatic controls, and hydraulic and dockside support equipment including MRO.systems.
•The non-aerospace defense market that we serve is primarily focused on naval vessels, with our pumps and valves used across most naval platforms in a wide variety of onboard applications. We are a trusted supplier to many countries' navies, leveraging our engineering and manufacturing capabilities to work directly with our customers in developing targeted solutions for mission critical applications including very low acoustic signature pumps for submarines.
•We also serve various other markets, such as hydrogen, medical and space leveraging our core products technologies and technical capabilities.
•In all of the markets we serve, we provide aftermarket components and repair services.
Brands
Aerospace & Defense manufactures and markets control valves, automatic recirculation valves,pumps, regulators, fluid controls, actuation systems, landing gear components, pneumatic valves and controls, electro-mechanical controls, electric motors and other flow control products and systems.subsystems. Aerospace & Defense provides actuation and fluid control systems and services through the following brands: CIRCOR Aerospace, Aerodyne Controls, CIRCOR Bodet, CIRCOR Industria, CIRCOR Motors, Hale Hamilton, Leslie Controls, Portland Valve, and Warren Pumps.
Products
Aerospace & Defense offers a range of solutions,products, including:
•Specialty Centrifugal, 2-Screw, and Propeller Pumps
•Specialized control valves
•MIL-Spec butterfly valves and actuators
•Electromechanical, pneumatic, and hydraulic, fluid and motion control systemscomponents and subsystems
•Brushless DC Motors
•Kinetic Switches
•Pressure regulators and pressure control systems
•Actuation components and sub-systems
In the manufacture of our products, we must comply with certain certification standards, such as AS9100C, ISO 9001:2008, National Aerospace & Defense Contractors Accreditation Program, Federal Aviation Administration Certification and European Aviation Safety Agency as well as other customer qualification standards. Currently all of our manufacturing facilities comply with the applicable standards.
Customers
Aerospace & Defense products and services are used bysold directly and indirectly to a range of customers, including those in the military and defense, commercial aerospace, business and general aviation and general industrial markets. Our customers include aircraft manufacturers (OEMs) and Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers to these customers.customers, missile systems integrators, Naval Shipyards, U.S. Department of Defense, U.K. Ministry of Defense, various commercial airlines, various industrial customers and various other end users.
Revenue and Backlog
Aerospace & Defense accounted for $272.6$282.7 million, $237.0$252.5 million, and $183.0$266.0 million, or 28%36%, 23%33%, and 36%35% of our net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 2017, respectively. Aerospace & Defense backlog as of January 31, 2020, was $191.1million compared with $183.3 million as of January 31, 2019. Aerospace & Defense backlog represents orders we believe to be firm.
Energy
The Energy segment significantly changed in 2019, reflecting CIRCOR's move away from the upstream oil and gas markets, as well as the divestiture of non-core assets. The Reliability Services business, which was added to the Energy segment in 2018 after the Fluid Handling acquisition, was divested in January of 2019. Reflecting our strategic shift away from upstream oil and gas, the EV business was divested in July 2019, and the DV business has been classified as held for sale. Additionally, in January 2020, we sold our non-core Instrumentation and Sampling business.
The remaining Energy businesses provide highly engineered integrated flow control solutions, valves, pipelines products and services for the midstream and downstream oil & gas and refinery markets.
We are focused on satisfying our customers’ mission-critical application needs by utilizing advanced technologies. Our flow control solutions can withstand extreme temperatures and pressures, and as such are used in the most critical and severe service applications. Our installations include refining and petrochemical process control, critical pressure control and midstream pipeline engineering solutions and services.
Energy is headquartered in Houston, Texas and has manufacturing facilities in North America, the United Kingdom, India and United Arab Emirates.
Markets and Applications
Energy serves a range of energy-focused global markets. Key to our business strategy is targeting additional markets that can benefit from our innovative products and system solutions. The primary markets served today include oil & gas: midstream and downstream, as well as petrochemical processing. The midstream markets are primarily served by our pipeline engineering business, and downstream and petrochemical markets are served primarily by our Refinery Valves, Instrumentation and Sampling business, and Reliability Services business until the latter two were sold in January 2020 and January 2019, respectively.
•Midstream Oil & Gas: This market begins at the mainline transmission pipeline and extends to the fence around the refinery or petrochemical plant. It includes certain ancillary equipment, as well as the gas processing plants that prepare and purify raw natural gas for entry into the major pipeline systems and Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) liquefaction and transport processes. Our valves are used for flow control in the main transmission lines, gathering systems, and storage facilities. We also provide inspection and cleaning products and services designed to ensure the integrity of transmission pipelines.
•Downstream Oil & Gas: The downstream market includes the refining, distilling, stripping, degassing, dehydrating, desulphurizing, and purifying of crude oil to its constituent components. In addition to flow control applications for feedstocks and process control across each downstream process unit, our refinery valves business provides highly specialized engineered solutions for coking and catalytic cracking that improve the safety and efficiency of operations within the refinery.
•Petrochemical Processing: The petrochemical processing market includes the refining and manufacture of chemicals derived from oil and gas, such as polyethylene. This market requires specific instrumentation and ancillary equipment to monitor the quality and efficiency of production.
Brands
Energy provides its flow control solutions and services through the following significant brands: DeltaValve, Pipeline Engineering, and TapcoEnpro.
Products
Energy offers a range of flow control solutions (distributed and highly engineered) and services, including:
Pipeline pigs, quick opening closure, pig signalers
Delayed coking unheading devices and fluid catalytic converter and isolation valves
For our manufactured products, we are subject to applicable federal, state and local regulations. In addition, many of our customers require us to comply with certain industrial standards, including those issued by the American Petroleum Institute, International Organization for Standardization, Underwriters’ Laboratory, American National Standards Institute, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, and the European Pressure Equipment Directive. We also need to meet standards that qualify us to be on authorized supplier lists with various global end users. We are fully qualified and licensed for the API 6D, API 6DSS and API 6A PSL4.
Customers
Energy’s products and services are sold to end-user customers, such as major oil companies, EPC companies, and distributors, through sales channels that include direct sales, sales representatives, and agents.
Revenue and Backlog
Energy accounted for $241.0 million, $288.9million, and $183.4 million, or 25%, 29%, and 36% of our net revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Energy’s backlog as of January 31, 2020 was $61.4million compared with $77.2 million as of January 31, 2019. Energy backlog represents backlog orders we believe to be firm.
CIRCOR Consolidated
Competition
The domestic and international markets for our products are highly competitive. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than us. We consider product brand, quality, performance, on-time delivery, customer service, price, distribution capabilities and breadth of product offerings to be the primary competitive factors in these markets. We believe that new product development and product engineering also are important to our success and that our position in the industry is attributable, in significant part, to our ability to develop innovative products and to adapt existing products to specific customer applications. Our ability to leverage our large installed base of equipment to drive repairs and spares growth is a competitive advantage.
The primary competitors of our Industrial segment include: Leistritz AG, Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Netzsch GmbH, ITT Corporation, IMI plc, SPX Flow, Inc., Seepex GmbH, and Naniwa Ltd.
The primary competitors of our Aerospace & Defense segment include: Transdigm, Crane Co., Curtiss-Wright Corporation, Moog, Inc., Parker Hannifin Corp., and Woodward Inc.
The primary competitors of our Energy segment include: T.D. Williamson, Blac Inc, IMI plc, and Baker Hughes.
New Product Development
Our engineering differentiation comes from our ability to offer products, solutions and services that address high pressure, high temperature, and caustic flow. Our solutions offer high standards of reliability, safety and durability in applications requiring efficiency, low leakage, low acoustics and precision movementin fluid and zero leakage.motion control.
We continue to develop new and innovative products to enhance our market positions.positions and drive growth. Our product development capabilities include designing and manufacturing custom applicationssolutions to meet high tolerance or close precision requirements. For example, our Energy segment operation can meet the tolerance requirements of sub-sea, cryogenic environments as well as critical service steam applications. Our Aerospace & Defense segment continues to expand its integrated systems design and testing capability to support bundled sub-systems for aeronautics applications, as well as acoustically superior motorspumps for marine applications. These testing and manufacturing capabilities enable us to develop and support customer-specified applications. In many cases, the unique characteristics of our customer-specified technologies have been subsequently used in broader product offerings. The Industrial segment provides unique fluid handlingflow control products for viscous and critical fluids with specific design and engineering capabilities, as well as highly differentiated smart technology for specific applications.capabilities.
We maintain a Global Engineering Center of Excellence in India with a capable technology and engineering team that complements the engineering resources in aour various business unit.units.
Customers
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022 and 2017, 2021, no customers accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated revenues. Our businesses sell into both long-term capital projects as well as short-cycle demand. As a result, we tend to experience fluctuations in orders, revenues and operating results at various points across economic and business cycles. Our Energy businesses can be cyclical in nature due to the fluctuation of the worldwide price, supply and demand for oil and gas. When the worldwide demand for oil and gas is depressed, the demand for our products used in those markets decreases as our customers with higher production costs will cut back investment and reduce purchases from us. The level of capital expenditures by national oil companies or the oil majors in exploration and production activities drive demand for our long cycle, engineered valves products. Maintenance expenditures during refinery turnarounds drive demand for our refinery valve products. Similarly, although not to the same extent as the oil & gas markets, the aerospace, military and maritime markets have historically experienced cyclical fluctuations in demand.
Selling and Distribution
Across our businesses we utilize a variety of channels to market our products and solutions. Those channels include direct sales, distributors and commissioned representatives, and our service centers.representatives. Our distribution and representative networkschannel partner network typically offeroffers technically trained sales forces with strong relationships in key markets.
We believe that our well-establishedestablished, global direct and indirect sales and distribution channels constitute a competitive strength. We believe that we have good relationships with our representatives and distributors. We continue to implement marketing programs to enhance these relationships. Our ongoing distribution-enhancement programs include reducing lead times, introducing new products, and offering competitive pricing, application design, technical training, and service.channel partners.
Intellectual Property
We ownThe Company relies upon a combination of trade secrets and patent and trademark registrations to protect its intellectual property. Our patents that are scheduled to expire between 20192022 and 20302038, and our trademarks that can be renewed as long as we continue to use them. We do not believe the vitality and competitiveness of any of our business segments as a whole depends on any one or more patents or trademarks. We own certain licenses such as software licenses, but we do not believe that our business as a whole depends on any one or more licenses.
Raw Materials
The raw materials used most often in our production processes are castings, forgings and bar stock of various materials, including stainless steel, carbon steel, bronze, copper, brass, titanium and aluminum. These materials are subject to price fluctuations that may adversely affect our results of operations. We purchase these materials from numerous suppliers and at times experience constraints on the supply of certain raw material as well as the inability of certain suppliers to respond to our needs. Historically, increases in the prices of raw materials have been partially offset by higher sales prices, active materials management, project engineering programs and the diversity of materials used in our production processes.
EmployeesRegulatory and Labor RelationsEnvironmental Matters
Our business and operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, both within and outside the United States, in areas such as: competition, government contracts, international trade, labor and employment, tax, environmental protection, workplace health and safety, and others. These and other laws and regulations impact the manner in which we conduct our business, and changes in legislation or government policies can affect our operations, both favorably and unfavorably. Below is a summary of some of the significant regulations that impact our business (see also Part I, Item IA, "Risk Factors").
Government Procurement. The services we provide to the U.S. federal government are subject to Federal Acquisition Regulation, the Truth in Negotiations Act, export controls rules and Department of Defense (DOD) security regulations, as well as many other laws and regulations. These laws and regulations affect how we transact business with our customers and, in some instances, impose additional costs on our business operations. A violation of specific laws and regulations could lead to fines, contract termination or suspension of future contracts. Our government clients can also terminate, renegotiate, or modify any of their contracts with us at their convenience.
Trade Controls. The export of our products is subject to applicable trade controls laws, including those in the U.S., the European Union, United Kingdom and China, and include, but are not limited to, the International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the Export Administration Regulations, and trade sanctions against embargoed countries. A violation of specific laws and regulations could lead to civil or criminal enforcement action and varying degrees of liability.
Anti-Bribery. We are subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar anti-bribery laws, which generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. The U.K. Bribery Act of 2010 prohibits both domestic and international bribery, as well as bribery across both private and public sectors. In addition, an organization that “fails to prevent bribery” committed by anyone associated with the organization can be charged under the U.K. Bribery Act unless the organization can establish the defense of having implemented “adequate procedures” to prevent bribery.
Human Capital
CIRCOR’s success depends on our ability to attract, develop, engage and retain key talent. Management oversees and drives a number of vital employee programs in support of these goals.
Employee Profile
As of JanuaryDecember 31, 2020,2022, CIRCOR had approximately 3,060, employees, of whom approximately 97% are full-time. Our workforce is located both in the U.S. and abroad, with 42% of our worldwide operations directly employed approximately 4,000 people. Weworkforce in Europe, 39% in the United States, 11% in India and the rest spread across the rest of Asia, the Middle East and Latin America.
Approximately 37% of our workforce is composed of skilled direct labor working in our factories across the globe, 30% is indirect labor in support of this direct labor, and 33% is selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) staff (including engineering, sales, finance, human resources and legal personnel). Approximately 6% of the Company’s U.S. employees are unionized. Outside the United States, we have 71 employees in North AmericaEurope that are represented by an employee representative organization, such as a union, works council or employee association.
Approximately 20% of the Company's global workforce is female, and 16% of the Company's employees in leadership roles are female. Approximately 35% of the Company's U.S. workforce and 14% of our U.S. employees in leadership roles are racially or ethnically diverse. At the Board of Directors level, 33% of our directors are female and 0% of our Board of Directors is racially or ethnically diverse (the Company had a racially diverse Board member, who had to resign last summer, due to health issues; he has not yet been replaced).
Talent Attraction
We employ a rigorous recruitment process to attract and hire the talent needed for our continued success and growth. This includes candidates from diverse backgrounds and with differing experiences. Candidates are covered by two collective bargaining agreements.carefully vetted and assessed in multiple stages and interviews. Our recruitment processes are designed to comply with local labor laws and regulations.
We continue to focus on creating a more diverse candidate pool. The current careers page on our website includes a specific section on diversity & inclusion and focused on improving our job descriptions, to make them more appealing to broader slate of potential candidates. We also haveprovided a standardized interview guide and unconscious bias training to hiring managers in 2021 and we continue to provide diversity and inclusion training to our leaders.
Talent Development
CIRCOR is committed to developing our talent. Many of our employees participate in an annual Talent Review Process and Performance Management Process, which helps assess the following employees covered by governmental regulationsperformance as well as the potential of employees. We focus on investment in three main methods of developing talent: (1) on-the-job, technical or workers' councils:skills-based training, (2) mentorship and (3) leadership and executive development training.
Germany - 702 employees
France - 105 employees
Mexico - 100 employees
Netherlands- 46 employees
United Kingdom - 25 employees
Sweden - 9 employees
We believe that our employee relations are good at this time.
We actively train our employees on leadership competencies, interpersonal skills, process improvement skills, compliance topics as well as technical skills. We work with high potential employees to create Individual Development Plans for them and provide opportunities for assessments and coaching as needed. In 2022, 74% of leadership positions were filled internally as CIRCOR lays heavy emphasis on promoting from within and creating growth opportunities for our employees. We use annual succession planning and periodic sessions with business leaders and the People team throughout the year to understand the open roles for which internal candidates might be available to fill.
Talent Retention
We are committed to creating a strong employee value proposition, and our retention strategy centers on building an inclusive, growth-oriented culture that is attractive to our employees. We have regular communications from our senior leaders to employees throughout the organization and provide channels for feedback.
We periodically conduct employee engagement surveys and other similar surveys to measure employee engagement and satisfaction. Our 2021 employee engagement survey had a greater than 70% participation rate, and measured employee engagement and satisfaction, and sought employee feedback, across a range of topics. In addition, our sites host town halls throughout the year to engage employees at a local level; some sites also have employee engagement committees that meet regularly with leadership to provide feedback. We continue to adapt to a hybrid workplace and have rolled out a flexible work policy for many of our employees. Our goal is for all of our employees, whether fully-remote, hybrid or in-office, to feel engagement and connected with CIRCOR.
In addition, we offer competitive compensation and benefits packages that are designed to retain, motivate and reward our employees. CIRCOR has a Pay for Performance philosophy, and we align our compensation practices with reference to external benchmarks, internal comparisons and the relationship between management and non-management remuneration. In 2022, we closely managed and responded to the changing job market, in order to retain talent. We seek to ensure that our pay practices do not discriminate on the basis of gender or race, taking into account job-related responsibilities, geographic location, and individual employee work experience, education and performance. Some of our employees participate in our short-term and/or long-term incentive program connecting payouts to achievement of key financial and other metrics and the employee’s contribution to those results.
We also provide competitive benefits programs in line with local market practice. We regularly review our benefits packages globally, especially in light of changing employees’ expectations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the entrance of Generation Z to our workforce. Additionally, we offer a global Employee Assistance Program to assist with our employee’s well-being.
We carefully monitor the voluntary attrition of our employees. In 2022, the annualized voluntary attrition rate was 9%. This is higher than last year but remains within our expectations.
Employee Health & Safety
We are committed to protecting the health and safety of our employees, and safety is one of our Absolutes. Our Absolutes, which are Safety, Controls and Ethics, are the three imperatives underlying everything we do at CIRCOR. Our culture of safety includes an ongoing training program, stand downs when injury events occur and encouraging our employees to speak up if they see a safety hazard. In 2021, we instituted a Safety Action Plan to reinforce the fundamentals of safety and focus on leading indicators.
In addition to common lagging indicators used to track employee safety, such as injuries, we look to leading indicators, such as safety observations and near-misses, integrated with established problem-solving methodologies to resolve issues that endanger worker safety. In 2022, our Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) was 0.75 and our Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR) was 0.32. These numbers are lower than our 2021 TRIR of 0.83 and LTIR of 0.48, with nominal recordable incidents and lost time incidents down year over year, driving rations lower even with a higher number of total hours worked across the organization. Additionally, 44% of our manufacturing sites had zero recordable incidents in 2022. We also had no work-related fatalities or incidents of occupational diseases. We aim to improve our safety numbers with continued training, regularly communicating our safety initiatives, and empowering our employees with measures including our Proactive Observation Program and Stop Work Authority.
We continue to strive to ensure the health, safety and general well-being of our teams. Actions we have taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, include the following:
•Encouraging those who are sick to stay home and continuing to use work-from-home where necessary to minimize potential outbreaks;
•Encouraging vaccination, and fully covering the cost of COVID-19 vaccinations
•Increasing cleaning protocols across all locations;
•Providing additional personal protective equipment and cleaning supplies;
•Implementing protocols to address actual and suspected COVID-19 cases and potential exposure;
•Utilization of masks to be worn as recommended by local law; and
•Expanding our Employee Assistance Program to all of our employees worldwide.
Diversity & Inclusion (“D&I”)
CIRCOR is committed to cultivating a workplace that makes diversity, equity, inclusion and transparency priorities in everything we do. In furtherance of that commitment, we have established active D&I initiatives in the areas of talent acquisition, talent development, total rewards, employee engagement and communications, which impact employees at all levels of the organization. In addition, we have a D&I Program Manager, an HR Vice President, and a Senior Executive Sponsor, who are driving our D&I initiatives and goals. Our primary goal is to increase gender and racial and ethnic representation throughout the organization, including senior management, and our initiatives are focused on that goal.
D&I achievements in 2022 included the following:
•Utilized metrics to understand penetration of activities and impact on creating diversity in the workplace;
•Celebrated key diversity events including Black History Month and US Pride Month, to support engagement efforts;
•Created a D&I learning path in our Learning Management System;
•Revised our Code of Conduct to include, among other things, a D&I Policy; and
•Continued employee communications on D&I topics and initiatives.
Available Information
We file reports on Form 10-Q with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")SEC on a quarterly basis, additional reports on Form 8-K from time to time, and an annual report on Form 10-K on an annual basis. These and other reports filed by us, or furnished by us, to the SEC in accordance with section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge from the SEC on its website at http://www.sec.gov. Additionally, our reports on Form 10-Q, Form 8-K, Form 10-K and amendments to those reports are available without charge, as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with, or furnished to, the SEC, on our Investor Relations website at http://investors.CIRCOR.com. The information on our website is not part of, or incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Set forth below are certain risk factors that we believe are material to our stockholders. The risks described in these risk factors, some of which we have actually experienced, could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and reputation. You should also consider these risk factors when you read “forward-looking statements” elsewhere in this report. You can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “may,” “hope,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential” or “continue,” the negative of those terms or other comparable terminology. Forward-looking statements are only predictions and can be adversely affected by any of the following risks:
Risks related to our end-markets are cyclical, which causes us to experience fluctuations in revenues or operating results.Material Weaknesses and Restatements
We have experienced,identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and those weaknesses have led to a conclusion that our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2022. Our inability to remediate the material weaknesses, our discovery of additional weaknesses, and our inability to achieve and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, could adversely affect our results of operations, our stock price and investor confidence in our company.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that companies evaluate and report on the effectiveness of their internal control over financial reporting. In addition, we engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to report on its evaluation of those controls. As disclosed in more detail under Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” below, we have identified four material weaknesses as of December 31, 2022 in our internal control over financial reporting resulting from (i) a lack of sufficient number of finance, accounting and internal controls personnel, (ii) a lack of design and effective controls to monitor at the corporate level significant balances recorded within the trial balances of smaller reporting locations, (iii) a lack of effective review controls to mitigate the risks of material misstatements within significant accounts of smaller reporting locations, and (iv) a lack of effective IT general controls over certain IT applications supporting financial reporting. Due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we have also concluded our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2022.
Failure to have effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures can impair our ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis and has led and could again lead to a restatement of our financial statements. For example, the identified material weaknesses resulted in material adjustments to the consolidated financial statements for the years ending December 31, 2020 and 2019, and interim and year to date periods through the nine months ended October 3, 2021. If, as a result of the ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, we cannot provide reliable financial statements, our business decision processes may be adversely affected, our business and results of operations could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information and our ability to obtain additional financing, or additional financing on favorable terms, could be adversely affected.
Our management has taken action to begin remediating the material weaknesses; however, certain remedial actions have only recently been undertaken, and while we expect to continue to experience, fluctuationsimplement our remediation plans throughout the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023, we cannot be certain as to when remediation will be fully completed. Additional details regarding the initial remediation efforts are disclosed in revenuesmore detail in Part II, Item 9A, “Controls and operating results dueProcedures” below. In addition, we could in the future identify additional internal control deficiencies that could rise to economicthe level of a material weakness or uncover other errors in financial reporting. During the course of our evaluation, we may identify areas requiring improvement and business cycles. Results of operations for any particular period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for any future period. We sellmay be required to design additional enhanced processes and controls to address issues identified through this review. In addition, there can be no assurance that such remediation efforts will be successful, that our products principally to aerospace, military, commercial aircraft, oil & gas exploration, transmission and refining, power generation, chemical processing and maritime markets. Although we serveinternal control over financial reporting will be effective as a variety of markets to reduce dependency on any one, a significant downturn in any oneresult of these markets could cause aefforts or that any such future deficiencies identified may not be material reductionweaknesses that would be required to be reported in future periods. In addition, we cannot assure you that our revenuesindependent registered public accounting firm will be able to attest that such internal controls are effective when they are required to do so.
If we fail to remediate these material weaknesses and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to offset. In addition, decreased market demand typicallyrely on the integrity of our financial results, which could result in excess manufacturing capacity amonginaccurate or additional late reporting of our competitors which, in turn,financial results, in pricing pressure. As a consequence, a significant downturn in our markets results in lower revenues and profit margins.
In particular, our Energy businesses are cyclical in nature as the worldwide demand for oil and gas fluctuates. Energy sector activity can fluctuate significantly in a short period of time, particularly in the United States, North Sea, the Middle East, Brazil and Australia, amongst other regions. When worldwide demand for oil and gas is depressed, the demand for our products used in maintenance and repair of existing oil and gas applications, as well as explorationdelays or new oilthe inability to meet our future reporting obligations or to comply with SEC rules and gas project applications, is reduced. Demand forregulations. This could result in claims or proceedings against us, including by shareholders or the SEC.The defense of any such claims could cause the diversion of the Company’s attention and resources and could cause us to incur significant legal and other expenses even if the matters are resolved in our productsfavor.
Risks Related to our Markets and services depends on a number of factors, including the maintenance and condition of industry assets, the volume of exploration and production activities and the capital expenditures of asset owners and maintenance companies. The willingness of asset owners and operators to make capital expenditures to produce and explore for sources of energy will continue to be influenced by numerous factors over which we have no control, including:Industry
the current and anticipated future prices for energy sources, including oil and natural gas, solar, wind and nuclear;
level of excess production capacity;
cost of exploring for and producing energy sources;
worldwide economic activity and associated demand for energy sources;
availability and access to potential hydrocarbon resources;
national government political priorities, including with respect to climate change risks;
development of alternate energy sources; and
environmental regulations.
As a result, we historically have generated lower revenues and profits in periods of declining demand or prices for crude oil and natural gas. Any downward pricing pressure on crude oil could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows, or results of operations.
We face significant competition and, if we are not able to respond, our revenues may decrease.
We operate in a highly competitive environment in each of the markets we serve, and we face significant competition from a variety of competitors in each of our markets. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial, marketing, personnel and other resources than we do. New competitors also could enter our markets.segments from numerous competitors. We consider product innovation, product quality, performance, customer service, on-time delivery, price, distribution capabilities and breadth of product offerings to be the primary competitive factors in our markets. Our competitors may be able to offer more
attractive pricing, duplicate our strategies, or develop enhancements to products that could offer performance features that are superior to our products. Competitive pressures, including those described above, and other factors could adversely affect our competitive position, resulting in a loss of market share or decreases in prices, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. In addition, some of our competitors are based in foreign countries and have cost structures and prices based on foreign currencies.
The majority of our transactions are denominated in either U.S. dollar or Euro currency. Accordingly, currency fluctuations could cause our U.S. dollar and/or Euro priced products to be less competitive than our competitors’ products that are priced in other currencies.
If we cannot continue operatingWe, along with our manufacturing facilitiescustomers and vendors, face the uncertainty in the public and private credit markets and in general economic conditions in the United States and around the world.
In recent years there has been at current or higher levels,times disruption and general slowdown of the public and private capital and credit markets in the United States and around the world. In particular, U.S. and global economies are experiencing high inflation, increasing interest rates and recessions. Such conditions can adversely affect our revenue, results of operations couldand overall financial growth. Our business can be adversely affected.
We operateaffected by a number of manufacturing facilities forfactors that are beyond our control such as general geopolitical, economic and business conditions and conditions in the productionfinancial services market, which each could materially impact our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of our products. The equipmentoperations. Additionally, many lenders and management systems necessary for such operations may break down, perform poorlyinstitutional investors, at times, have reduced funding to borrowers, including other financial institutions. A constriction on future lending by banks or fail, resultinginvestors could result in fluctuations in manufacturing efficiencies. Such fluctuations may affecthigher interest rates on future debt obligations, restrict our ability to deliver productsobtain sufficient financing to meet our long-term operational and capital needs or limit our ability in the future to consummate strategic acquisitions. Any uncertainty in the credit markets or increase in interest rates could also negatively impact the ability of our customers and vendors to finance their operations on acceptable terms or at all which, in turn, could result in a timely basis, whichdecline in our sales and in our ability to obtain necessary raw materials and components. Our customers may also reduce their purchases of our products because of increased costs from inflation or uncertainties relating to the current recessionary environment. The occurrence of any of the foregoing risks could have a materialan adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. We have continuously enhanced and improved Lean manufacturing techniques as part of the CIRCOR Operating System. We believe that this process produces meaningful reductions in manufacturing costs. However, continuous improvement of these techniques may cause short-term inefficiencies in production. If we are not successful in continuously improving our processes, our results of operations may suffer.
We completed the acquisition of FH on December 11, 2017. The success of the acquisition, including the achievement of anticipated benefits and cost savings of the acquisition, is subject to a number of uncertainties and will depend, in part, on our ability to successfully combine and integrate FH's business into our business in an efficient and effective manner. Potential difficulties that we may encounter in the integration process include the following:
the inability to successfully integrate FH's business into our own in a manner that permits us to achieve the cost savings and operating synergies anticipated to result from the acquisition, which could result in the anticipated benefits of the acquisition not being realized partly or wholly in the time frame currently anticipated or at all;
integrating personnel, IT systems and corporate, finance and administrative infrastructures of FH into our Company while maintaining focus on providing consistent, high quality products and services;
coordinating and integrating our internal operations, compensation programs, policies and procedures, and corporate structures;
potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen or increased costs and expenses;
the possibility of faulty assumptions underlying expectations regarding potential synergies and the integration process;
performance shortfalls as a result of the diversion of management’s attention caused by integrating operations; and
servicing the debt that we have incurred in connection with the acquisition.
Any of these factors could result in us failing to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition, on the expected timeline or at all, and could adversely impact our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
Actions of stockholders or others in response to expiration of the recent unsolicited tender offer could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources, and have an adverse effect on our business.
During the second quarter of 2019, we became subject to an unsolicited tender offer to purchase all outstanding shares of our common stock. At the time the tender offer expired on July 19, 2019, approximately two-thirds of our issued and outstanding shares had been tendered and, as a result, we have and expect that we will continue to receive additional attention and scrutiny from investors, potential acquirors, activist stockholders and others. Various actions to seek to effect change are available to such persons, including private engagement, public campaigns, proxy contests, litigation and other efforts to force transactions not supported by our board of directors or to acquire control over our Company. Responding to such actions is costly and time-consuming, may not align with our business strategies and could divert the attention of our board of directors and management from the management of our operations and the pursuit of business strategies. In addition, perceived uncertainties as to our future direction, strategy or leadership created as a consequence of any such actions may result in the loss of potential business opportunities, harm our ability to attract new investors, customers and employees, and cause our stock price to experience periods of volatility or stagnation.
A potential proxy contest launched by GAMCO Investors, Inc. (“GAMCO”) could cause us to incur substantial costs, divert management’s attention and resources, and have an adverse effect on our business.
On February 6, 2020, GAMCO Investors, Inc. notified us of its intention to nominate two directors at our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders. If GAMCO pursues a proxy contest or other actions at the 2020 annual meeting of stockholders to elect directors other than those recommended by our board of directors, or takes other actions that contest or conflict with our strategic direction, any such actions could have an adverse effect on us because:
responding to proxy contests may be costly and time-consuming and may disrupt our operations and divert the attention of our management and our employees; and
perceived uncertainties as to our future direction may be exploited by our competitors, cause concern to our current or potential customers, result in the loss of potential business opportunities and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners and may affect our relationships with vendors, customers and other third parties.
Implementation of our divestiture, restructuring, or simplification strategies may not be successful, which could affect our ability to increase our revenues or could reduce our profitability.
We continually review our current business and products to attempt to maximize our performance. As part of this process, during 2019 we disposed of, announced plans to dispose of, or entered into agreements to dispose of our Reliability Services business, Engineered Valves business, certain assets and liabilities related to our Spence and Nicholson product lines, Distributed Valves business, and Instrumentation and Sampling business. We may in the future deem it appropriate to divest additional product lines or businesses. Any divestiture may result in a dilutive impact to our future earnings if we are unable to offset the dilutive impacts from the loss of revenue associated with the divested assets or businesses, as well as significant write-offs, including those related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. A successful divestiture depends on various factors, including our ability to effectively transfer liabilities, contracts, facilities and employees to any purchaser, identify and separate the intellectual property to be divested from the intellectual property that we wish to retain, reduce fixed costs previously associated with the divested assets or business, and collect the proceeds from any divestitures. In addition, if customers of the divested business do not receive the same level of service from the new owners, this may adversely affect our other businesses to the extent that these customers also purchase other products offered by us. All of these efforts require varying levels of management resources, which may divert our attention from other business operations.
A focus of our Company is to simplify the way we are organized and the number of facilities we manage. We believe that such focus will reduce overhead structure, enhance operational synergies, and result in improved operating margins and customer service. Nevertheless, we may not achieve expected cost savings from restructuring and simplification activities and actual charges, costs and adjustments due to such activities may vary materially from our estimates. Our ability to realize anticipated cost savings, synergies, margin improvement, and revenue enhancements may be affected by a number of factors, including: our ability to effectively eliminate duplicative overhead, rationalize manufacturing capacity, synchronize information technology systems, consolidate warehousing and distribution facilities and shift production to more economical facilities; significant cash and non-cash integration and implementation costs or charges in order to achieve those cost savings, which could offset any such savings; and our ability to avoid labor disruption in connection with divestitures or restructuring activities.
If we do not realize the expected benefits or synergies of any divestiture, restructuring, or simplification activities, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be negatively impacted.
Implementation of our acquisition strategy may not be successful, which could affect our ability to increase our revenues, reduce our profitability or lead to significant impairment charges.
One of our strategies has been and is to increase our revenues and expand our markets through acquisitions that will provide us with complementary products and access to additional geographic markets. We expect to spend significant time and effort expanding our existing businesses and identifying, completing and integrating acquisitions.products. We expect to face competition for acquisition candidates that may limit the number of acquisition opportunities available to us and may result in higher acquisition prices. In addition, our announcement in March 2022 that our Board is reviewing strategic alternatives available to the Company may impact our ability to complete acquisitions. We cannot be certain that we will be able to identify, acquire or profitably manage additional acquired companies or successfully integrate such additional acquired companies without substantial costs, delays or other problems. Acquisitions may also
involve a number of special risks, including: adverse effects on our reported operating results; use of cash; diversion of management’s attention; loss of key personnel at acquired companies; or unanticipated management or operational problems or legal liabilities. In addition, uncertainty in the credit markets and increases in interest rates could negatively impact our ability to finance acquisitions on acceptable terms or at all.
Moreover, there can be no assurance that companies we have previously acquired or that we may acquire in the future ultimately will achieve the revenues, profitability or cash flows, or generate the synergies upon which we justify our investment in them; as a result, any such under-performing acquisitions could result in impairment charges which would adversely affect our results of operations. The acquired assets of businesses include goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets whichthat are required to be tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if impairment indicators are present. Events or changes that could indicate that the carrying value of our goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets may not be recoverable include reduced future cash flow estimates, slower growth rates in industry segments in which we participate and a decline in our stock price and market capitalization. The Company has recently experienced a significant decline in its market capitalization to below book value, which increases the risk of impairment charges. In addition, any prolonged material disruption of our employees, distributors, suppliers or customers, whether due to the recent coronavirus diseaseCOVID-19 or otherwise, would negatively impact our global sales and operating results and could lead to impairments and other valuation allowances.allowances relating to acquired businesses as well as our overall business.
Risks Related to our Operations
If we are unable tocannot continue operating successfully overseasour manufacturing facilities at current or to successfully expand into new international markets,higher levels, our revenues may decrease.results of operations could be adversely affected.
We deriveoperate a significant portionnumber of manufacturing facilities for the production of our revenue from sales outsideproducts. The equipment and management systems necessary for such operations may break down, perform poorly or fail, resulting in fluctuations in manufacturing efficiencies. Such fluctuations may affect our ability to deliver products to our customers on a timely basis, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations. We are working to continuously enhance and improve lean manufacturing techniques as part of the United States. In addition,CIRCOR Operating System. We believe that this process produces meaningful reductions in manufacturing costs. However, continuous improvement of these techniques may cause short-term inefficiencies in production. If we are not successful in continuously improving our processes, our results of operations may suffer.
Further, a catastrophic event could result in the loss of the use of all or a portion of one of our key growth strategies is to sellmanufacturing facilities. Although we carry property and business interruption insurance, our products in international markets not significantly served by us in portions of Europe, Latin America and Asia. We market our products and services outside of the United States through direct sales, distributors, and technically trained commissioned representatives. Wecoverage may not succeed in our effortsbe adequate to further penetrate these markets. Moreover, conducting business outside the United States is subject to additional risks, including currency exchange rate fluctuations; changes in regional, political or economic conditions, trade protection measures such as tariffs or import or export restrictions; and complex, varying and changing government regulations and legal standards and requirements, particularly with respect to price protection, competition practices, export control regulations and restrictions, customs and tax requirements, immigration, anti-boycott regulations, data privacy, intellectual property, anti-corruption and environmental compliance, including U.S. customs and export regulations and restrictions and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and the occurrence of anycompensate us for all losses that may occur. Any of these factorsevents individually or in the aggregate could materiallyhave a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and adversely affect our operations.operating results.
If we cannot pass on higher raw material or manufacturing costs to our customers, we may become less profitable.
One of the ways we attempt to manage the risk of higher raw material and manufacturing costs is to increase selling prices to our customers. The markets we serve are extremely competitive and customers may not accept price increases or may look to alternative suppliers, which may negatively impact our profitability and revenues. This risk may be heightened in the current highly inflationary and recessionary economic environment.
IfThe inability of our suppliers cannotto provide us with adequate quantities of materials to meet our customers’ demands on a timely basis orhas had, and may continue to have, an adverse effect on our business; in addition, if the quality of the materials provided does not meet our standards, we may lose customers or experience lower profitability.
Some of our customer contracts require us to compensate those customers if we do not meet specified delivery obligations. We rely on numerous suppliers to provide us with our required materials and in many instances these materials must meet certain specifications. In addition, we continue to increase our dependence on lower cost foreign sources of raw materials, components, and, in some cases, completed products. ManagingWhile we actively manage our supply chain, having a geographically diverse supply base inherently poses significant logistical challenges, and we could experience diminished supplier performance resulting in longer than expected lead times and/or product quality issues. In addition, the potential physical effects of climate change, such as increased frequency and severity of storms, floods and other climatic events, natural disasters, acts of war or political instabilities or pandemics or other illness outbreaks, could disrupt our supply chain, and cause our suppliers to incur significant costs in preparing for or responding to these effects or events. These or other similar changes or events could lead to increased costs. The occurrence of such factors could have a negative impact on our ability to deliver products to customers within our committed time frames and could adversely impact our results of operations, financial conditionscondition and cash flows.
Our international activities expose usFor example, during the second half of 2021, the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as labor shortages and logistics constraints, contributed to fluctuations in currency exchange rates that could adversely affectsupply chain shortages and negatively impacted our results of operations as we faced unexpected difficulties obtaining raw material, castings, and cash flows.components across CIRCOR. In the near term, we anticipate continued greater than usual uncertainty as a result of global supply chain challenges and that shortages of components and raw materials may continue to negatively impact the operation of our business.
Our international manufacturing and sales activities expose us to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our major foreign currency exposures involve the markets in Western Europe and Canada. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could result in our (i) paying higher prices for certain imported goods and services, (ii) realizing lower prices for any sales denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, (iii) realizing lower net income, on a U.S. dollar basis, from our international operations due to the effects of translation from weakened functional currencies, and (iv) realizing higher costs to settle transactions denominated in other currencies. Any of these risks could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.
We use derivatives to help manage the currency risk related to certain business transactions denominated in foreign currencies. To the extent these transactions are completed, the contracts minimize our risk from exchange rate fluctuations because they offset gains and losses on the related derivatives. However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to effectively utilize these forward exchange contracts in the future to offset significant risk related to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. In addition, there can be no assurances that counterparties to such contracts will perform their contractual obligations to us in order for us to realize the anticipated benefits of the contracts.
If we experience delays in introducing new products or if our existing or new products do not achieve or maintain market acceptance, our revenues may decrease.
Our industries are characterized by: intense competition; changes in end-user requirements; technically complex products; and evolving product offerings and introductions.
We believe our future success depends, in part, on our ability to anticipate or adapt to these factors and to offer, on a timely basis, mission-critical products that meet customer demands. Failure to develop new and innovative products or to custom design existing products could result in the loss of existing customers to competitors or the inability to attract new business, either of which may adversely affect our revenues. The development of new or enhanced products is a complex and uncertain process requiring the anticipation of technological and market trends. We may experience design, manufacturing, marketing or other difficulties, such as an inability to attract a sufficient number of qualified engineers, which could delay or prevent our development, introduction or marketing of new products or enhancements and result in unexpected expenses.
If we fail to manufacture and deliver high quality products in accordance with industry standards, we will lose customers.
Product quality and performance are a priority for our customers since many of our product applications involve caustic or volatile chemicals and, in many cases, involve processes that require precise control of fluids. Our products are used in the aerospace, military, commercial aircraft, analytical equipment, oil & gas exploration, transmission and refining, power generation, chemical processing and maritime industries. These industries require products that meet stringent performance and safety standards, such as the standards of the American Petroleum Institute, International Organization for Standardization, Underwriters’ Laboratory, American National Standards Institute, American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the European Pressure Equipment Directive. If we fail to maintain and enforce quality control and testing procedures, our products will not meet these stringent performance and safety standards whichthat are required by many of our customers. Non-compliance with the standards could result in a loss of current customers and damage our ability to attract new customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
We depend on our key personnel and the loss of their services may adversely affect our business.
We believe that our success depends on our ability to hire new talent and the continued employment of our senior management team and other key personnel. If one or more members of our senior management team or other key personnel were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our business could be seriously harmed. In addition, if any of our key personnel joins a competitor or forms a competing company, some of our customers might choose to use the services of that competitor or those of a new company instead of our own. Other companies seeking to develop capabilities and products similar to ours may hire away some of our key personnel. If we are unable to maintain our key personnel and attract new employees, the execution of our business strategy may be hindered and our growth limited.
We face risks from product liability lawsuits that may adversely affect our business.
We, like other manufacturers, face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims in the event that the use of our products results in personal injury, property damage or business interruption to our customers. We may be subjected to various product liability claims, including, among others, that our products include inadequate or improper instructions for use or installation, or inadequate warnings concerning the effects of the failure of our products. Although we maintain quality controls and procedures, including the testing of raw materials and safety testing of selected finished products, we cannot be certain that our products will be free from defect. In addition, in certain cases, we rely on third-party manufacturers for our products or components of our products. Although we have liability insurance coverage, we cannot be certain that this insurance coverage will continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost or, if available, will be adequate to cover any such liabilities. For example, liability insurance typically does not afford coverage for a design or manufacturing defect unless such defect results in injury to person or property. We generally attempt to contractually limit liability to our customers to risks that are insurable but are not always successful in doing so. Similarly, we generally seek to obtain contractual indemnification from our third-party suppliers, and for us to be added as an additional insured party under such parties’ insurance policies. Any such indemnification or insurance is limited by its terms and, as a practical matter, is limited to the credit worthiness of the
indemnifying or insuring party. In the event that we do not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification, product liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
We rely on information technology in our operations, and any material failure, inadequacy, interruption or security failure of that technology could harm our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including systems of third parties and the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and manage or support a variety of business processes, including operational and financial transactions and records, personal identifying information, payroll data and workforce scheduling information. We purchase some of our information technology from vendors, on whom our systems depend. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools and monitoring to provide security for the processing, transmission and storage of Company and customer information. Although we have taken steps to protect the security of our information systems and the data maintained in those systems, no such measures can eliminate the possibility of the systems' improper functioning or the improper access or disclosure of confidential or personally identifiable information such as in the event of cyber-attacks. Security breaches, whether through physical or electronic break-ins, computer viruses, ransomware, impersonation of authorized users, attacks by hackers or other means, can create system disruptions or shutdowns or the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Additionally, outside parties frequently attempt to fraudulently induce employees, suppliers or customers to disclose sensitive information or take other actions, including making fraudulent payments or downloading malware, by using “spoofing” and “phishing” emails or other types of attacks. Our employees have been and likely will continue to be targeted by such fraudulent activities. Outside parties may also subject us to distributed denial of services attacks or introduce viruses or other malware through “trojan horse” programs to our users’ computers in order to gain access to our systems and the data stored therein. Because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade service, or sabotage systems change frequently and continuously become more sophisticated, often are not recognized until launched against a target and may be difficult to detect for a long time, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventive or detective measures.
IfWhen Company, personal or otherwise protected information is improperly accessed, tampered with or distributed, we may face significant financial exposure, including incurring significant costs to remediate possible injury to the affected parties. We may also be subject to sanctions and civil or criminal penalties if we are found to be in violation of the privacy or security rules under federal, state, or international laws protecting confidential information. Any failure to maintain proper functionality and security of our information systems could results in the loss of trade secrets or other proprietary or competitively sensitive information, compromise personally identifiable information regarding customers or employees, interrupt our operations, damage our reputation, subject us to liability claims or regulatory penaltiespenalties. The costs associated with maintaining robust information security mechanisms and controls are also increasing and are likely to increase further in the future. We continuously seek to maintain a robust program of information security and controls, but the impact of a material information technology event could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Terrorist activity, acts of war, and/or political instability around the world could cause economic conditions to deteriorate and adversely impact our businesses.
In the past, terrorist attacks have negatively impacted general economic, market and political conditions. Terrorist acts, acts of war or political instability (wherever located around the world) could cause damage or disruption to our business, our facilities or our employees which could significantly impact our business, financial condition cash flowsor results of operations. The potential for future terrorist attacks, the national and international responses to terrorist attacks, political instability, and other acts of war or hostility, have created many economic and political uncertainties, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations.operations in ways that cannot presently be predicted. U.S. Government imposed sanctions and export restrictions on certain businesses in Russia as a result of its actions in Ukraine could cause us to experience adverse effects with respect to certain business partners or customers, including inability to ship, or collect payments for, completed orders. In addition, with manufacturing facilities located worldwide, including facilities located in North America, Western Europe, Morocco, China, and India, we may be impacted by terrorist actions not only against the United States but in other parts of the world as well. In some cases, we are not insured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of war.
The trading priceimpact of our common stockthe COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted, and continues to be volatilepose risks to, our business, results of operations and investors in our common stock may experience substantial losses.financial condition.
The trading pricesituation relating to the COVID-19 pandemic and its potential effects on our business and financial results remains dynamic. The broader implications for our business and results of operations remain uncertain and will depend on many factors outside our common stockcontrol, including, without limitation, the timing, extent, trajectory and duration of the pandemic (including COVID-19 variants), the development, availability and effectiveness of treatments and vaccines, the imposition of protective public safety measures, and the impact of the pandemic on the global economy and enterprise and consumer behaviors. We may face the same risks with respect to any future pandemics or other illness outbreaks. If these and other effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, including its effect on broader economies, financial markets and overall demand environment for our products, continue or worsen, or if any future pandemic or other illness outbreak were to occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
The COVID-19 pandemic or any other future pandemic or other illness outbreak may further increase the likelihood and severity of other risks discussed in the past, has been volatile. Our common stock could decline or fluctuate in response to a variety of factors,this “Risk Factors” section, including but not limited to:to risks related to competition, development of the market for and demand for our failure to meet our performance estimates or performance estimates of securities analysts; changesproducts, delays in financial estimatesthe development and production of our revenuesproducts, availability and operating results or buy/sell recommendations by securities analysts;cost of raw materials required to produce our products and other supply chain disruptions, labor shortages reliance on third parties, our international scale, our exposure to currency exchange rate fluctuations and the timing of announcements by us or our competitors concerning significant product line developments, contracts or acquisitions or publicity regarding actual or potential results or performance; fluctuation in our quarterly operating results caused by fluctuations in revenue and expenses; substantial salescredit risks of our common stock by our existing shareholders; general stock market conditions;customers and fluctuations in oilresellers, and gas prices or other economic or external factors. While we attempt in our public disclosures to provide forward-looking information in order to enable investors to anticipate our future performance, such information by its nature represents our good-faith forecasting efforts. In recent years, the unprecedented nature of oil prices, credit and financial crises and economic recessions, together with the uncertain depth and duration of these crises, has rendered such forecasting more difficult. As a result, our actual results have differed materially, and going forward could differ materially, from our forecasts, which could cause further volatility in the value ofcapital markets.
Risks Related to our common stock.International Operations
In recent years the stock market as a whole has experienced dramatic price and volume fluctuations. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management attention and resources.
The costs of complying with existing or future governmental regulations on importing and exporting practices and of curing any violations of these regulations, could increase our expenses, reduce our revenues or reduce our profitability.
We are subject to a variety of laws and international trade practices, including regulations issued by the United States Bureau of Industry and Security, the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of State and the Department of Treasury. We cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international trading practices might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted. Future regulations could limit the countries into which certain of our products may be sold or could restrict our access to, and increase the cost of obtaining products from, foreign sources. In addition, actual or alleged violations of such regulations could result in enforcement actions and/or financial penalties that could result in substantial costs.
If we incur higher costs as a result of trade policies, treaties, government regulations or tariffs, we may become less profitable.
There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States and China, including with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs. The current U.S. administration has called for substantial changes to U.S. foreign trade policy and has implemented greater restrictions on international trade and significant increases in tariffs on goods imported into the U.S. Under the current status, we expect that tariff increases will primarily impact our Industrial segment. We are unable to predict whether or when additional tariffs will be imposed or the impact of any such future tariff increases.
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow, wecontinue operating successfully overseas or to successfully expand into new international markets, our revenues may not be able to service our debt obligations, including making payments on our outstanding term loan.decrease.
Our ability to make payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness when due, including theWe derive a significant indebtedness that we incurred in connection with the acquisition of FH, depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions, industry cycles and financial, business and other factors affecting our consolidated operations, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our outstanding debt, we may be required to, among other things:
seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets;
refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness;
divert funds that would otherwise be investedrevenue from sales outside the United States. In addition, one of our key growth strategies is to sell our products in international markets not significantly served by us in portions of Europe, Latin America and Asia. We market our products and services outside of the United States through direct sales, distributors, and technically trained commissioned representatives. We may not succeed in our operations;
sell selected assets;efforts to further penetrate these markets. Moreover, conducting business outside the United States is subject to risks, including currency exchange rate fluctuations; changes or
reduce instability in regional, political or delay planned capital expenditures or operating expenditures.
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt, which could negatively impact our financial results. In addition, we may not be able to obtain any such financing, refinancing or complete a sale of assets on economically favorable terms. In the case of financing or refinancing, favorable interest rates will be dependent on the health of the debt capital markets.
Our existing indebtedness could also have the effect, among other things, of reducing our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions, reducing funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitionsoutbreak of war or expansion of hostilities, trade protection measures such as tariffs or import or export restrictions; and other general corporate purposes complex, varying and changing government regulations and legal standards and requirements, particularly with respect to price protection, competition practices, export control regulations and restrictions, customs and tax requirements, immigration, anti-boycott regulations, data privacy, intellectual property, anti-corruption and environmental compliance, including U.S. customs and export regulations and restrictions and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Additionally, the U.S. Government continues to impose and/or creating competitive disadvantages relativeconsider imposing sanctions on certain businesses and persons in Russia. We continue to other companies with lower debt levels.
Our credit agreement requiresmonitor and evaluate additional sanctions and export restrictions that we maintain certain ratiosmay be imposed by the U.S. Government and limitsany responses from Russia that could directly affect our supply chain, or our ability to make acquisitions, incur debt, pay dividends, make investments, sell assetscontinue delivering products to or merge.
Our credit agreement, dated December 11, 2017, governs our indebtedness. This agreement includes provisions which place limitations on certain activities, including our ability to: issue; incur additional indebtedness; create any liens or encumbrances on our assets or make any guarantees; make certain investments; pay cash dividends above certain limits; or dispose of or sell assets or enter into a merger or a similar transaction. These restrictions may limit our ability to operatereceiving payments from our business andpartners or customers, including customers who may prohibit or limit our abilitydecide to execute our business strategy, compete, enhance our operations, take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise or meet our capital needs. Furthermore, future debt instruments or other contracts could contain more restrictive financial or other covenants.completely withhold contract payments owed to us. The breachoccurrence of any of these covenants by us or the failure byfactors could materially and adversely affect our operations.
Our international activities expose us to meet any of these conditions or requirementsfluctuations in currency exchange rates that could result in a default under any or all ofadversely affect our indebtedness. If we are unable to
service our indebtedness, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.and cash flows.
Various restrictions and agreements could hinder a takeover of us which is not supported by our board of directors or which is leveraged but which may be beneficial to our shareholders.
Our amendedinternational manufacturing and restated certificate of incorporationsales activities expose us to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Our major foreign currency exposures involve the markets in Western Europe and amended and restated by-laws, as well as the Delaware General Corporation Law, contain provisions that could delay or prevent a changeAsia. Fluctuations in control in a transaction that is not approved by our board of directors or that is on a leveraged basis or otherwise but that shareholders may consider favorable, including transactions in which shareholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares. These include provisions establishing a staggered board, limiting the shareholders’ powers to remove directors, and prohibiting shareholders from calling a special meeting or taking action by written consent in lieu of a shareholders’ meeting. In addition, our board of directors has the authority, without further action by the shareholders, to set the terms of and to issue preferred stock. Issuing preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of the owners of our common stock, including the loss of voting control to others.
Delaying or preventing a takeoverforeign currency exchange rates could result in our shareholders ultimately receiving less(i) paying higher prices for their shares by deterring potential bidderscertain imported goods and services, (ii) realizing lower prices for any sales denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, (iii) realizing lower net income, on a U.S. dollar basis, from our stock or assets.international operations due to the effects of translation from weakened functional currencies, and (iv) realizing higher costs to settle transactions denominated in other currencies. Any of these risks could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.
A change in international governmental policies or restrictions could result in decreased availability and increased costs for certain components and finished products that we purchase from sources in foreign countries, which could adversely affect our profitability.
Like most manufacturers of flow control products, we attempt, where appropriate, to reduce costs by seeking lower cost sources of certain components and finished products. Many such sources are located in developing countries such as India and China, where a change in governmental approach toward U.S. trade could restrict the availability to us of such sources. In addition, periods of war or other international tension and global health pandemics could interfere with international freight operations and hinder our ability to purchase such components and products. A decrease in the availability of these items could hinder our ability to timely meet our customers’ orders. We attempt, when possible, to maintain alternate sources for these components and products and the capability to produce such items in our own manufacturing facilities. However, the cost of obtaining such items from alternate sources or producing them ourselves is often considerably greater, and a shift toward such higher cost production could therefore adversely affect our profitability.
We, alongRisks Related to our Business Strategy
Our ability to execute our strategy is dependent upon our ability to attract, train and retain qualified personnel.
Our continued success depends, in part, on our ability to identify, attract, motivate, train and retain qualified personnel in key functions and geographic areas, including the members of our senior management team. In particular, we are dependent on our ability to recruit and retain qualified engineers with the requisite education, background and industry experience to assist in the development, enhancement, introduction and manufacture of our customersproducts.
Failure to attract, train and vendors, faceretain qualified personnel, whether as a result of an insufficient number of qualified candidates or the allocation of inadequate resources to training, integration and retention, could impair our ability to execute our business strategy and could have an adverse effect on our business prospects. Our success also depends to a large extent upon our ability to attract and retain key executives. The loss of the services of one or more of these key employees could have an adverse effect, at least in the short to medium term, on significant aspects of our business, including the ability to manage our business effectively and the successful execution of our strategies. Our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel has been, and may continue to be, negatively affected by our Board's pending strategic alternative review process. If we fail to retain qualified personnel, particularly key employees, we could incur disruptions to the completion of certain initiatives and we could incur significant costs in hiring, training, developing and retaining their replacements.
Recent changes in the Company’s executive management team may be disruptive to, or cause uncertainty in, the public and private credit markets and in general economic conditions in the United States and around the world.
In recent years there has been at times disruption and general slowdown of the public and private capital and credit markets in the United States and around the world. Such conditions can adversely affect our revenue,business, results of operations and overall financial growth. Our business can be affected by a numberthe price of factors that are beyond our control suchthe Company’s common stock.
On December 10, 2021, Abhishek Khandelwal announced his resignation from his position as general geopolitical, economicChief Financial Officer of the Company effective December 31, 2021, and business conditionsthe Company’s Board of Directors appointed Arjun Sharma, Senior Vice President of Business Development as the Company’s interim Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 2022. Subsequently, on January 19, 2022, Mr. Scott A. Buckhout stepped down from his position as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, effective immediately, and conditionsthe Company’s Board of Directors promoted Aerospace & Defense Group President Tony S. Najjar to the position of Chief Operating Officer and appointed him as interim Chief Executive Officer effective immediately. On August 10, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the change of Mr. Najjar’s title to President & Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Sharma’s title to Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of Business Development.These changes in the financial services market, which eachCompany’s executive management team may be disruptive to, or cause uncertainty in, the Company’s business, and any additional changes to the executive management team could materiallyhave a negative impact on the Company’s ability to manage and grow its business effectively. Any such disruption or uncertainty or difficulty in efficiently and effectively filling key roles could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations and the price of the Company’s common stock.
Our review of strategic alternatives may not result in the identification or completion of a transaction, or create additional value for our stockholders, and the process may have an adverse effect on our business.
On March 14, 2022, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had initiated a review of potential strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value. At this time it has not made any decisions as to any potential strategic alternatives. We cannot make any assurance that the Board’s review will result in a transaction or other strategic change to the Company or its business, or that the outcome of the review will provide greater value to our stockholders than the current price of our common stock. The strategic review process may require significant resources and expenses. In addition, speculation and uncertainty regarding the strategic review process may cause or result in disruption of our business; distraction of our employees; difficulty in recruiting, hiring, motivating, and retaining qualified personnel; difficulty in maintaining or negotiating and consummating new business or strategic relationships or transactions; potential litigation; and increased stock price volatility. If we are unable to mitigate these or other potential risks related to the uncertainty caused by the strategic review process, it may adversely affect our business or adversely impact our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. Additionally, many lendersoperations and institutional investors, at times, have reduced fundingcash flows.
Risks Related to borrowers, includingLegal, Regulatory and Compliance Matters
We face risks from product liability lawsuits that may adversely affect our business.
We, like other financial institutions. A constriction on future lending by banks or investors could result in higher interest rates on future debt obligations, restrict our abilitymanufacturers, face an inherent risk of exposure to obtain sufficient financing to meet our long-term operational and capital needs or limit our abilityproduct liability claims in the future to consummate strategic acquisitions. Any uncertainty inevent that the credit markets could also negatively impact the abilityuse of our customersproducts results in personal injury, property damage or business interruption to our customers. We may be subjected to various product liability claims, including, among others, asbestos-related claims, claims that our products include inadequate or improper instructions for use or installation, or inadequate warnings concerning the effects of the failure of our products. Although we maintain quality controls and vendors to finance their operations which, in turn, could result in a decline in our sales and in our ability to obtain necessaryprocedures, including the testing of raw materials and safety testing of selected finished products, we cannot be certain that our products will be free from defect. In addition, in certain cases, we rely on third-party manufacturers for our products or components thus potentially havingof our products. Although we have liability insurance coverage, we cannot be certain that this insurance coverage will continue to be available to us at a reasonable cost or, if available, will be adequate to cover any such liabilities. For example, liability insurance typically does not afford coverage for a design or manufacturing defect unless such defect results in injury to person or property. We generally attempt to contractually limit liability to our customers to risks that are insurable but are not always successful in doing so. Similarly, we generally seek to obtain contractual indemnification from our third-party suppliers, and for us to be added as an additional insured party under such parties’ insurance policies. Any such indemnification or insurance is limited by its terms and, as a practical matter, is limited to the credit worthiness of the indemnifying or insuring party. In the event that we do not have adequate insurance or contractual indemnification, product liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
Terrorist activityThe costs of complying with existing or future governmental regulations on importing and exporting practices and of curing any violations of these regulations, could increase our expenses, reduce our revenues or reduce our profitability.
We are subject to a variety of laws and international trade practices, including regulations issued by certain United States governmental agencies and authorities in the European Union. We cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our international trading practices might be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be administered or interpreted. Future regulations could limit the countries into which certain of our products may be sold or could restrict our access to, and increase the cost of obtaining products from, foreign sources. We continue to monitor and evaluate additional sanctions and export restrictions that may be imposed by the U.S. Government with respect to Russia, and any responses from Russia, that could impact our business. Sanctions or restrictions could cause us to be unable to complete contractual commitments to end customers, cause our end customers to fail to compensate us for previously ordered or delivered products, or cause funds or products to be subjected to legal holds. The aggregate revenue from customers in Russia and Ukraine for each of the fiscal years ended 2022 and 2021 was less than 1% of consolidated net revenues, primarily related to our Downstream Oil & Gas business in the Industrial reporting segment. Currently we have a pending project in Russia that could result in a $4.0 million reversal of unbilled and other receivable if tighter sanctions or restrictions prevented us from delivering the project and receiving payment. In addition, actual or alleged violations of such regulations could result in enforcement actions and/or political instability around the worldfinancial penalties that could cause economic conditions to deteriorate and adversely impact our businesses.result in substantial costs.
In the past, terrorist attacks have negatively impacted general economic, market and political conditions. Terrorist acts, acts
If we incur higher costs as a result of wartrade policies, treaties, government regulations or political instability (wherever located around the world) could cause damage or disruption to our business, our facilities or our employees which could significantly impact our business, financial condition or results of operations. The potential for future terrorist attacks, the national and international responses to terrorist attacks, political instability, and other acts of war or hostility, including the recent and current conflicts in Iraq, Afghanistan and the Middle East, have created many economic and political uncertainties, which could adversely affect our business and results of operations in ways that cannot presently be predicted. In addition, with manufacturing facilities located worldwide, including facilities located in North America, Western Europe, Morocco, and India,tariffs, we may be impacted by terrorist actions not only againstbecome less profitable.
There is currently significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United States butand China, including with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs. The past U.S. presidential administration had called for substantial changes to U.S. foreign trade policy and had implemented greater restrictions on international trade and significant changes in other parts oftariffs on goods imported into the world as well. In some cases,U.S. Under the current administration, we are not insured for losses and interruptions caused by terrorist acts and acts of war.
The coronavirus outbreak couldexpect that tariff increases will primarily impact our operations.
Our business and operations couldIndustrial segment. We are unable to predict whether or when additional tariffs will be materially and adversely affected by the effects of a widespread outbreak of a contagious disease, including the recent outbreak of the respiratory illness caused by a coronavirus strain first identified in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, or any other outbreak of contagious diseases, and other adverse public health developments. These effects could include disruptions or restrictions on our employees’ and other service providers’ ability to travel, as well as temporary closures of our facilitiesimposed or the facilitiesimpact of our customers, suppliers, or other vendors in our supply chain, potentially including single source suppliers.any such future tariff changes.
The costs of complying with existing or future environmental regulations and curing any violations of these regulations could increase our expenses or reduce our profitability.
We are subject to a variety of environmental laws relating to the storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, use and disposal of chemicals, solid and hazardous waste and other toxic and hazardous materials used to manufacture, or resulting from the process of manufacturing, our products. We cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future regulatory requirements to which our operations might be subject or the manner in which existing or future laws will be administered or interpreted. Future regulations could be applied to materials, products or activities that have not been subject to regulation previously. The costs of complying with new or more stringent regulations, or with more vigorous enforcement of these or existing regulations, could be significant.
Environmental laws require us to maintain and comply with a number of permits, authorizations and approvals and to maintain and update training programs and safety data regarding materials used in our processes. Violations of these requirements could result in financial penalties and other enforcement actions. We also could be required to halt one or more portions of our operations until a violation is cured. Although we attempt to operate in compliance with these environmental laws, we may not succeed in this effort at all times. The costs of curing violations or resolving enforcement actions that might be initiated by government authorities could be substantial.
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting and those weaknesses have led to a conclusion that our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2019. Our ability to remediate the material weaknesses, our discovery of additional weaknesses, and our inability to achieve and maintain effective
disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, could adversely affect our
results of operations, our stock price and investor confidence in our company.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that companies evaluate and report on the effectiveness of their internal control over financial reporting. In addition, we engaged our independent registered public accounting firm to report on its evaluation of those controls. As disclosed in more detail under Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” below, we have identified three material weaknesses as of December 31, 2019 in our internal control over financial reporting resulting from (i) a lack of a sufficient complement of corporate personnel with appropriate levels of accounting and controls knowledge and experience commensurate with our financial reporting requirements, (ii) a lack of design and effective controls over the analyses, accounting for, and review of non-routine transactions at the corporate level, and (iii) a lack of design and effective controls over the preparation, review and approval of account reconciliations at the corporate level and certain of our shared service locations. Due to the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we have also concluded our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2019.
Failure to have effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures could impair our ability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis and could lead to a restatement of our financial statements. For example, the identified material weaknesses resulted in immaterial adjustments to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019 and caused a difference between the financial results we reported in the press release we issued on March 2, 2020 and furnished to the SEC with our Current Report on Form 8-K on the same date and reported in this annual report. If, as a result of the ineffectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures, we cannot provide reliable financial statements, our business decision processes may be adversely affected, our business and results of operations could be harmed, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information and our ability to obtain additional financing, or additional financing on favorable terms, could be adversely affected. In addition, failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could result in sanctions by regulatory authorities.
Our management has taken action to begin remediating the material weaknesses; however, certain remedial actions have not started or have only recently been undertaken, and while we expect to continue to implement our remediation plans throughout the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020, we cannot be certain as to when remediation will be fully completed. Additional details regarding the initial remediation efforts are disclosed in more detail under Item 9A, “Controls and Procedures” below. In addition, we may in the future identify additional internal control deficiencies that could rise to the level of a material weakness or uncover other errors in financial reporting. During the course of our evaluation, we may identify areas requiring improvement and may be required to design additional enhanced processes and controls to address issues identified through this review. In addition, there can be no assurance that such remediation efforts will be successful, that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective as a result of these efforts or that any such future deficiencies identified may not be material weaknesses that would be required to be reported in future periods. In addition, we cannot assure you that our independent registered public accounting firm will be able to attest that such internal controls are effective when they are required to do so.
If we fail to remediate these material weaknesses and maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to rely on the integrity of our financial results, which could result in inaccurate or late reporting of our financial results, as well as delays or the inability to meet our reporting obligations or to comply with SEC rules and regulations. The consequences of such failure include delisting actions by the New York Stock Exchange, investigation and sanctions by regulatory authorities and stockholder investigations and lawsuits, any of which could adversely affect our business and the trading price of our common stock.
Regulations related to “conflict minerals” may cause us to incur additional expenses and could limit the supply and increase the cost of certain metals used in manufacturing our products.
Under the conflict minerals rule, public companies must disclose whether specified minerals, known as conflict minerals, are necessary to the functionality or production of products manufactured or contracted to be manufactured. The rule requires a disclosure report to be filed by May 31st of each year. The conflicts mineral rule could affect sourcing at competitive prices and availability in sufficient quantities of certain minerals used in the manufacture of our products, including tantalum, tin, gold and tungsten. The number of suppliers who provide conflict-free minerals is limited. In addition, there may be material costs associated with complying with the disclosure requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of certain minerals used in our products, as well as costs of possible changes to products, processes, or sources of supply as a consequence of such verification activities. As our supply chain is complex, we may not be able to sufficiently verify the origins of the relevant minerals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement, which may harm our reputation. In addition, we may encounter challenges to satisfy those customers who require that all of the components of our products be certified as conflict-free, which could place us at a competitive disadvantage if we are unable to do so.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
The trading price of our common stock continues to be volatile, and investors in our common stock may experience substantial losses.
The trading price of our common stock may be, and, in the past, has been volatile. Our common stock could decline or fluctuate in response to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to: our Board's pending strategic review process; our failure to meet our performance estimates or performance estimates of securities analysts; changes in financial estimates of our revenues and operating results or buy/sell recommendations by securities analysts; the timing of announcements by us or our competitors concerning significant product line developments, contracts or acquisitions or publicity regarding actual or potential results or performance; fluctuation in our quarterly operating results caused by fluctuations in revenue and expenses; substantial sales of our common stock by our existing stockholders; general stock market conditions; rising interests rates or inflation; our prior restatement of our financials; and fluctuations in oil and gas prices or other economic or external factors. While we attempt in our public disclosures to provide forward-looking information in order to enable investors to anticipate our future performance, such information by its nature represents our good-faith forecasting efforts. As a result, our actual results have differed materially, and going forward could differ materially, from our forecasts, which could cause further volatility in the value of our common stock.
In recent years the stock market as a whole has experienced dramatic price and volume fluctuations. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against companies following periods of volatility in the market price of their securities. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management attention and resources.
Risks Related to our Indebtedness
If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow, we may not be able to service our debt obligations, including making payments on our outstanding term loan.
Our ability to make payments of principal and interest on our indebtedness when due, including the significant indebtedness that we incurred in connection with our acquisition of Colfax Corporation's Fluid Handling business (“FH”), depends upon our future performance, which will be subject to general economic conditions (including recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, increasing inflation and interest rates and recessionary risks), industry cycles and financial, business and other factors affecting our consolidated operations, many of which are beyond our control. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations in the future to service our outstanding debt, we may be required to, among other things:
•seek additional financing in the debt or equity markets;
•refinance or restructure all or a portion of our indebtedness;
•divert funds that would otherwise be invested in our operations;
•sell selected assets; or
•reduce or delay planned capital expenditures or operating expenditures.
Such measures might not be sufficient to enable us to service our debt, which could negatively impact our financial results. In addition, we may not be able to obtain any such financing, refinancing or complete a sale of assets on economically favorable terms or at all. In the case of financing or refinancing, favorable interest rates will be dependent on the health of the debt capital markets and our credit rating. Our ability to obtain such financing or refinancing may be negatively impacted by current disruptions in the credit markets, and our costs of such financing or refinancing may not be on economically acceptable or desirable terms because of increasing interest rates.
Our existing indebtedness could also have the effect, among other things, of reducing our flexibility to respond to changing business and economic conditions, reducing funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes or creating competitive disadvantages relative to other companies with lower debt levels.
Our credit agreement requires that we maintain certain ratios and limits our ability to make acquisitions, incur debt, pay dividends, make investments, sell assets or merge.
Our credit agreement, dated December 20, 2021, amended on April 8, 2022, and May 27, 2022 (as amended, the "Credit Agreement"), governs our senior secured term loan and senior secured revolving credit facility. This agreement includes provisions which place limitations on certain activities, including, without limitation, our ability to: incur additional indebtedness; create liens or encumbrances on our assets; provide guarantees; make certain investments, loans and acquisitions; pay certain dividends or redeem, repurchase or retire certain capital stock or certain indebtedness; engage in certain transactions with our affiliates; enter into certain restrictive agreements; or dispose of or sell assets; or enter into mergers or similar transactions. These restrictions may limit our ability to operate our business and may prohibit or limit our ability to execute our business strategy, compete, enhance our operations, take advantage of potential business opportunities as they arise or meet our capital needs. Furthermore, future debt instruments or other contracts could contain more restrictive financial or other covenants. The breach of any of these covenants by us or the failure by us to meet any of these conditions or requirements could result in a default under any or all of our indebtedness, which could result in the lenders thereunder ending their obligation to make loans to us and declaring any outstanding indebtedness under the credit agreement or other applicable debt instrument immediately due and payable. Alternatively, our lenders could charge us substantial consent fees to secure amendments or waivers for our non-compliance with financial or other debt covenants. If we are unable to service our indebtedness, our business, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.
Discontinuation, replacement or reform of LIBOR could affect interest rates under our credit agreement and financing costs.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement are made at variable rates, based on London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) as a reference rate. The ICE Benchmark Administration Limited, which administers LIBOR, has announced that it plans to cease publication of the remaining LIBOR tenors on June 30, 2023. In light of this announcement, the future of LIBOR at this time is uncertain and any changes in the methods by which LIBOR is determined or regulatory activity related to LIBOR’s phaseout could cause LIBOR to perform differently than in the past or cease to exist. In the United States the Alternative Reference Rate Committee convened by the US Federal Reserve identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) as its preferred alternative reference rate to the US Dollar LIBOR. Our Credit Agreement includes a provision for determining the reference rate in the event LIBOR is discontinued, including a potential transition to the use of SOFR as the new reference rate. Prior to the phase-out of LIBOR, we expect to reach agreement with our lenders to use SOFR in lieu of LIBOR. We do not expect a significant change to the effective interest rate on our borrowing as a result of any replacement reference rate, however, it is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates. Whether SOFR attains market acceptance as a LIBOR replacement tool is uncertain. In the event we are unable to reach agreement on a replacement reference rate, the loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement from time to time using LIBOR as a reference rate will convert to the base rate, which could result in higher interest rates on these term loans and any such revolving loans.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
We maintain 2518 major manufacturing facilities worldwide, including operations located in North America, Western Europe, Morocco, China, and India. We also maintain sales offices or warehouses from which we ship finished goods to customers, distributors and commissioned representative organizations. Our executive office is located in Burlington, Massachusetts and is leased.
Our Energy segment has major manufacturing facilities located in North America, the United Kingdom, India and Dubai. Properties in South Carolina, Texas, Utah and the United Kingdom are leased. Our Aerospace & Defense segment has major manufacturing facilities located in North America, United Kingdom, France, Morocco and India. Properties in New York and California are leased.Morocco. Our Industrial segment has major facilities located in North America, Germany, India and China. Properties in Germany, India and China are leased.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Segment | Leased | | Owned | | Total |
| Industrial | 5 | | | 8 | | | 13 | |
| Aerospace & Defense | 2 | | | 3 | | | 5 | |
| Total | 7 | | | 11 | | | 18 | |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Segment | Leased | | Owned | | Total |
| Industrial | 6 |
| | 6 |
| | 12 |
|
| Aerospace & Defense | 1 |
| | 5 |
| | 6 |
|
| Energy | 4 |
| | 3 |
| | 7 |
|
| Total | 11 |
| | 14 |
| | 25 |
|
In general, we believe that our properties, including machinery, tools and equipment, are in good condition, are well maintained, and are adequate and suitable for their intended uses. Our manufacturing facilities generally operate five days per week on one or two shifts. We believe our manufacturing capacity could be increased by working additional shifts and weekends and by successful implementation of our CIRCOR Operating System. We also have low-cost sources for manufacturing in India and Morocco which have capacity to fulfill our expected manufacturing needs. We believe that our current facilities will meet our near-term production requirements without the need for additional facilities.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
For information regarding our legal proceedings refer to the first two paragraphs of Note 17,16, Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees, to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, which disclosure is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, the Company has self-reported to the SEC relating to the accounting irregularities identified at the Pipeline Engineering business discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company continues to respond to requests for information from the SEC. At this time, it is not possible to predict the outcome of the Company’s correspondence with the SEC, including whether or not any proceeding will be initiated or, if so, when or how the matter will be resolved.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “CIR.”“CIR”.
Our Board of Directors is responsible for determining our dividend policy. The timing and level of any dividends will necessarily depend on our Board of Directors’ assessments of earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors, including restrictions, if any, imposed by our lenders. On February 28, 2018, we announced the suspension of our nominal dividend, as part of our capital deployment strategy.
As of of March 2, 2020,10, 2023, there were 19,920,23020,365,293 shares of our common stock outstanding and we had 5445 holders of record of our common stock. We believe the number of beneficial owners of our common stock was substantially greater on that date.
The graph below compares the cumulative 5-Year total return provided shareholdersstockholders on CIRCOR International, Inc.'s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 index, the Russell 2000 index, our previous2019 peer group (“2018 Peer2019 Group”), and our updated2022 peer group (“20192022 Peer Group”). The companies included in the 20182019 and 2022 Peer Group and the 2019 Peer GroupGroups are listed in footnotes 1 and 2 below, respectively. We revised our peer group to incorporate peers relevant to the businesses we acquired in the Fluid Handling acquisition along with divestitures of non-core businesses. AnAn investment of $100 (with reinvestment of all dividends) is assumed to have been made in our common stock, in each index and in each of the peer groups on December 31, 20142017 and its relative performance is tracked through December 31, 2019.2022.
21
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 12/14 | | 12/15 | | 12/16 | | 12/17 | | 12/18 | | 12/19 |
| CIRCOR International, Inc. | $ | 100.00 |
| | $ | 70.14 |
| | $ | 108.28 |
| | $ | 81.47 |
| | $ | 35.65 |
| | $ | 77.38 |
|
| S&P 500 | 100.00 |
| | 101.38 |
| | 113.51 |
| | 138.29 |
| | 132.23 |
| | 173.86 |
|
| Russell 2000 | 100.00 |
| | 95.59 |
| | 115.95 |
| | 132.94 |
| | 118.30 |
| | 148.49 |
|
| 2018 Peer Group | 100.00 |
| | 84.83 |
| | 104.72 |
| | 95.00 |
| | 60.15 |
| | 76.78 |
|
| 2019 Peer Group | 100.00 |
| | 78.65 |
| | 84.12 |
| | 112.27 |
| | 87.27 |
| | 116.16 |
|
| |
• | 2018 Peer Group: There are three companies included in the Company's 2018 Peer Group which are: Dover Corp, IDEX Corp and Schlumberger NV.
|
| |
• | 2019 Peer Group: The eight companies included in the Company's 2019 Peer Group are:Alfa Laval Ab, Flowserve Corp, Gardner Denver Holdings Inc, Imi Plc, Metso Oyj, Spx Flow Inc, Sulzer Ag and Weir Group Plc.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | 12/17 | | 12/18 | | 12/19 | | 12/20 | | 12/21 | | 12/22 |
| CIRCOR International, Inc. | | | $ | 100.00 | | | $ | 43.76 | | | $ | 94.99 | | | $ | 78.96 | | | $ | 55.83 | | | $ | 49.22 | |
| S&P 500 | | | 100.00 | | | 95.62 | | | 125.72 | | | 148.85 | | | 191.58 | | | 156.88 | |
| Russell 2000 | | | 100.00 | | | 88.99 | | | 111.70 | | | 134.00 | | | 153.85 | | | 122.41 | |
| 2019 Peer Group | | | 100.00 | | | 76.17 | | | 107.45 | | | 130.08 | | | 168.83 | | | 143.16 | |
| 2022 Peer Group | | | 100.00 | | | 88.57 | | | 118.83 | | | 117.28 | | | 150.75 | | | 135.81 | |
•2019 Peer Group: The eight companies included in the Company's 2019 Peer Group are: Alfa Laval Ab, Flowserve Corp, Gardner Denver Holdings Inc, Imi Plc, Metso Oyj, Sulzer Ag and Weir Group Plc.
•2022 Peer Group: The twelve companies included in the Company's Industrial Peer Group are: Crane Holdings Co, Alfa Laval Ab, Sulzer Ag and Weir Group Pl, Flowserve Corp, ImI Plc, Rotork Plc, Zurn Elkay Corp, ITT Inc., Curtiss-Wright Corp, Moog Inc, Woodward Inc, and Hexcel Corp.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following table presents certain selected financial data that has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes and should be read along with the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in this Annual Report.
Not Applicable.
The consolidated statements of (loss) income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in this Annual Report. The consolidated statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, are derived from our consolidated financial statements not included in this Annual Report.
Selected Financial Data
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 (2) | | 2017 (3) | | 2016 (3) | | 2015 (3) |
| Statement of (Loss) Income Data (1): | | | | | | | | | |
| Net revenues | $ | 964,313 |
| | $ | 1,013,470 |
| | $ | 505,492 |
| | $ | 380,062 |
| | $ | 355,262 |
|
| Gross profit | 308,809 |
| | 325,203 |
| | 172,674 |
| | 137,914 |
| | 126,265 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | 37,681 |
| | 21,653 |
| | 16,307 |
| | (5,627 | ) | | (12,538 | ) |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (133,935 | ) | | $ | (39,384 | ) | | $ | 11,789 |
| | $ | 10,101 |
| | $ | 9,863 |
|
| Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | |
| Total assets | $ | 1,470,945 |
| | $ | 1,791,612 |
| | $ | 1,906,799 |
| | $ | 820,756 |
| | $ | 669,915 |
|
| Total debt | 636,297 |
| | 786,037 |
| | 795,208 |
| | 251,200 |
| | 90,500 |
|
| Shareholders’ equity | 391,411 |
| | 528,993 |
| | 601,974 |
| | 404,410 |
| | 400,777 |
|
| Total capitalization | $ | 1,027,708 |
| | $ | 1,315,030 |
| | $ | 1,397,182 |
| | $ | 655,610 |
| | $ | 491,277 |
|
| Other Financial Data: | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted earnings per common share | $ | (6.73 | ) | | $ | 1.99 |
| | $ | 0.70 |
| | $ | 0.61 |
| | $ | 0.58 |
|
| Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 19,903 |
| | 19,834 |
| | 16,849 |
| | 16,536 |
| | 16,913 |
|
| Cash dividends declared per common share | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.15 |
| | $ | 0.15 |
| | $ | 0.15 |
|
| (1) See Note 6, Special and Restructuring charges, net, of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, for additional details on charges included in the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017 operating income above. The statement of income data for the year ended December 31, 2016 includes special and restructuring charges, net of $17.2 million. The statement of income data for the year ended December 31, 2015 includes special and restructuring charges, net of $14.4 million. |
| (2) On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts, which had a material impact on revenues during the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company discloses the impact of this change on revenue in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. On January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715), which had a material impact in 2018. Refer to Note 16, Retirement Plans, to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. |
| (3) On December 11, 2017 we acquired FH, on October 12, 2016 we acquired Critical Flow Solutions, and on April 15, 2015 we acquired Schroedahl. |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
See Part 1, Item 1, Business,“Business”, for additional detail on forward looking statements.
Company Overview
We design, manufacture and market differentiated technologyCIRCOR International is one of the world’s leading providers of mission critical flow control products and sub-systemsservices for markets including industrial, aerospacethe Industrial and defense, and energy. CIRCORAerospace & Defense markets. The Company has a diversified flow and motion control product portfolio with recognized,of market-leading brands that fulfillserving its customers’ mission critical needs.most demanding applications. CIRCOR markets its solutions directly and through various sales partners to more than 14,000 customers in approximately 100 countries. The Company has a global presence with approximately 3,100 employees and is headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts. See Part 1, Item 1, Business, for additional information regarding the description of our business.
We organize our reporting structure into two segments: Aerospace & Defense and defenseIndustrial. Both the current and prior periods are reported under these two segments.
The Company's Aerospace & Defense segment continues to experience lingering effects of the COVD-19 pandemic, primarily in our Commercial Aerospace end markets, are expectedand impacts from volatile foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Commercial Aerospace order rates improved in 2022 compared to grow2021 as demand for commercialOEM components and aftermarket services increased with air travel continuesframer production rates and aircraft utilization. We expect that a recovery to increase and funding on military programs inpre-pandemic levels of demand will not occur until the U.S. continues to improve in 2020. Capital expenditures inend of 2023. While our Defense business has been less impacted by the industrial end markets thatpandemic, we serve are expected to grow modestly, although there are signs ofdid experience a slowdown in Europe, North America, Chinagovernment spending on spare parts as well as some delays on key programs which impacted our revenues in 2022. However, we expect a return to near term and India.long-term growth in this end market driven by our positions on key U.S. defense programs, including the Joint Strike Fighter and Columbia class submarines, strong backlog, and new product introductions in close partnership with our customers. We continue to focus on increasing our global aftermarket and deploying value-based pricing across the segment, both of which will contribute to drive growth and margin expansion.
The Company's Industrial reporting segment continues to experience the lingering effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, the ongoing conflict between Russia and Ukraine, and impacts driven by global energy inflation and volatile foreign exchange rates and interest rates. We exited 2021 with a strong backlog that positions the Industrial segment well for revenue growth in 2023 and beyond. We expect to experience lower demand forstrong growth in our longer-cycle end markets, such as Commercial Marine and Downstream Oil & Gas, as we deliver on improved orders from 2022. Our General Industrial end market, which includes products that serve the power generation, chemical processing, and stream driven commercialother customers, is expected to experience moderate growth. We continue to focus on increasing our global aftermarket, deploying value-based pricing across the segment, and residential construction markets. We expect continuedsimplifying our organizational structure to drive growth inand margin expansion.
In both reporting segments, the downstreamCompany's results from operations were, and midstream oil and gas markets. We do not expect an improvement in the commercial marine sector as global shipbuilding continuescontinue to be, constrained, however,adversely impacted by global supply chain constraints and rising inflation. In 2022, we do expectfaced unexpected difficulties in procuring certain raw material, castings, and components, additional labor constraints due to COVID-19 and a challenging labor market as well as inflation on both material and logistics. These challenges continued to evolve in 2022, in particular with inflation levels, including energy inflation, reaching multi-decade highs, and driving corresponding volatility in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. Should inflation or interest rates, or both, continue to increase higher than expected or stay high for longer than expected, the regulatory environment will cause demand forCompany could face additional financial exposure. In order to mitigate the impact of these factors on our products in the commercial marine sector.
Weoperations and financial position, we continue to implement actions to mitigateacross the impact on our earningscompany including, but not limited to: list price increases and surcharges, structural cost out actions, changes in suppliers from lower demandwhich we procure material, and increasingly competitive environment. In addition, we are investing in productsmanufacturing productivity through the implementation of the CIRCOR Operating System and technologies designed to help solve our customers’ most difficult problems. We expect to further simplify CIRCOR by standardizing technology, reducing facilities, consolidating suppliers and achieving world class operational excellence, including working capital management. We believe our cash flow from operations and financing capacity is adequate to support these activities.80/20 across the company. Finally, continuing to attract and retain diverse and talented personnel, including the enhancement of our global sales, operations, product management and engineering organizations, remains an important part of our strategy during 2020.2023.
Finally, we continue to monitor and evaluate additional sanctions and export restrictions that may be imposed by the U.S. Government and other governments along with any responses from Russia that could directly affect our supply chain, business partners or customers. Further tightening of sanctions or restrictions could cause us to be unable to complete contractual commitments to end customers, cause our end customers to fail to compensate us for previously ordered or delivered products, or cause funds or products to be subjected to legal holds. The aggregate revenue from customers in Russia and Ukraine for each of the fiscal years ended 2022 and 2021 was less than 1% of consolidated net revenues, primarily related to our Downstream Oil & Gas business in the Industrial reporting segment. Currently we have a pending project in Russia that could result in approximately $4.0 million reversal of unbilled revenue and other receivables if tighter sanctions or restrictions prevented us from delivering the project and receiving payment. Additionally, the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has and continues to adversely impact demand in that region, increase energy costs related to our operations, and negatively impact material cost and availability.
Basis of Presentation
All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. We operate and report financial information using a 52-week fiscal year ending December 31. The data periods contained within our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q reflect the results of operations for the 13-week, 26-week and 39-week periods which generally end on the Sunday nearest the calendar quarter-end date. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period financial statement presentation, including the results of discontinued operations and reportable segment information.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based upon its consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"(“GAAP”). The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its significant estimates, including those related to contracts accounted for under the percentage of completion method, bad debts, inventories, intangible assets and goodwill, purchase accounting, delivery penalties, income taxes, and contingencies including litigation. Management believes goodwill, revenue recognition and income taxes to be the most complex and sensitive judgments because of their significance to the consolidated financial statements and which result primarily from the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. Management bases its estimates on historical experience, current market and economic conditions and other assumptions that management believes are reasonable. The results of these estimates form the basis for judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities where the values are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
There have been no significant changes from the methodology applied by management for critical accounting estimates previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018. 2021.
For information regarding our significant accounting policies, refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, which disclosure is incorporated by reference herein.Report.
Goodwill
For goodwill, we perform an impairment assessment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis as of our October month endmonth-end or more frequently if circumstances warrant. In October 2019 when
During the fourth quarter of 2021, we identified a change in our reporting units due to economic deviations within the Industrial business segment. Refinery valves (“RV”) and Industrial were determined to be two separate reporting units within the Industrial business segment. With the change in reporting units, we performed an impairment test prior to the change, on our previous one reporting unit, and then performed an impairment test immediately after the change on the two reporting units which also coincides with our annual impairment test date of October month end. With the change, we assigned goodwill to the Industrial and RV reporting units based on their relative fair values.
As of October 2022 month end, the Company had goodwill balances within its Industrial and A&D reporting units, with no goodwill in its RV reporting unit. For the annual goodwill assessment, we estimated the fair value of eachIndustrial and Aerospace & Defense reporting units, using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. We selected this method as being the most meaningful in preparing the goodwill assessments because the use of the income approach typically generates a more precise measurement of fair value than the market approach. In applying the income approach to our accounting for goodwill, we make assumptions about the amount and timing of future expected cash flows, terminal value growth rates and appropriate discount rates. The amount and timing of future cash flows within our discounted cash flow analyses is based on our most recent operational budgets, current industry and market conditions, and other estimates of future performs. The terminal value growth rate is used to calculate the value of cash flows beyond the last projected period in our discounted cash flow analyses and reflects our best estimates for stable, perpetual growth of its reporting units. We corroborated the valuations that arose from the discounted cash flow approach by performing both a market multiple valuation and by reconciling the aggregate fair value of its reporting units to its market capitalization at the time of the test. As RV has no goodwill balance, following the $10.5 million goodwill impairment charge recorded in 2021, we did not use an income approach, but did estimate RV's fair value using market approach for purposes of performing a reconciliation of the fair value of our reporting units to the market capitalization as of the date of our annual impairment assessment.
The fair value of Industrial and A&D reporting units exceeded the respective carrying amount, and no goodwill impairments were recorded. The fair values utilized foramounts as of the date of our 2019 goodwill assessment exceeded the carrying amounts by more than 20% for our Energy, Aerospace
& Defense, and Industrial reporting units, respectively.assessment. The growth rate assumptions utilized were consistent with growth rates within the markets that we serve. If our results significantly vary from our estimates, related projections, or business assumptions in the future due to change in industry or market conditions, we may be required to record impairment charges.
On March 29, 2020, we reorganized our reporting units and the stock price dropped below book value, which we determined were triggering events requiring an assessment of our goodwill and indefinite-lived trade names. Based on our impairment assessment as of March 29, 2020, we concluded that our goodwill in the Industrial reporting unit was impaired and, accordingly, recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $138.1 million in the quarter ended March 29, 2020.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recorded based on the amount of consideration we expect to be entitled to as a result of satisfying our performance obligations. Revenue on our point in time contracts are recognized when the customer obtains control of the product, which is generally at the time of shipping. Revenues and costs on certain long-term contracts are recognized over-time using an input measure (e.g., costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs at completion, known as the “cost-to-cost” method) as we incur costs on our contracts. We use a cost-to-cost measure of progress because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer which occurs as it incurs costs on its contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, revenue is recognized proportionally as costs are incurred. Contract costs include labor, materials and subcontractors’ costs, other direct costs and an allocation of overhead, as appropriate. Accounting for over-time contracts requires reliable estimates in order to estimate total contract revenue and costs. For these contracts, management reviews the progress and execution of our performance obligations at least quarterly. Management estimates the profit on a contract as the difference between the total estimated revenue and estimate at completion (“EAC”) costs and recognizes the resultant profit over the life of the contract, using the cost-to-cost EAC input method to measure progress toward complete satisfaction of a performance obligation. A change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of the related contracts. Management recognizes adjustments in estimated profit on contracts under the cumulative catch-up method. Under this method, the impact of the adjustment on profit recorded to date is recognized in the period the adjustment is identified. Revenue and profit in future periods of contract performance is recognized using the adjusted estimate. The impact of adjustments in contract estimates on our operating earnings may be reflected in operating expenses and/or revenue.
The transaction price for our contracts represents our best estimate of the consideration we will receive and includes assumptions regarding variable consideration as applicable. Certain of our long-term contracts contain fees or other provisions that can either increase or decrease the transaction price. We include estimated amounts in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved. Our estimates of variable consideration and determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the transaction price are based largely on an assessment of our anticipated performance, historical performance, and all other information that is reasonably available to us.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Any material changes in tax rates or changes in tax laws could cause our estimates of taxes we anticipate to pay or to recover in the future to change. Any material changes could create an increase or a decrease in our effective tax rate.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, the Company initially recognizes the financial statement effect of a tax position when, based solely on its technical merits, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of greater than fifty percent) that the position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority. Those tax positions failing to qualify for initial recognition are recognized in the first interim period in which they meet the more likely than not standard, are resolved through negotiation or litigation with the taxing authority, or upon expiration of the statute of limitations. De-recognition of a tax position that was previously recognized occurs when an entity subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being sustained. Tax laws are complex and often subject to varied interpretations. Therefore, the ultimate outcome with respect to taxes we may owe may differ from the amounts recognized.
ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, requires a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets ("DTAs") if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence should be commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. The more negative evidence that exists, (a) the more positive evidence is necessary and (b) the more difficult it is to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed for some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset. Should there be a cumulative loss in recent years it is considered a significant piece of negative evidence that is difficult to overcome in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.
The Company recognized a valuation allowance for the German and the U.S. net DTAs to the extent of reversing DTLs during the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company continued to maintain a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets in Germany and the U.S. as both jurisdictions remain in a cumulative three year loss position at December 31, 2022. The Company calculated the valuation allowance based on the reversal of temporary differences. The Company concluded that the negative evidence associated with the history of losses outweighed any positive evidence as of December 31, 2022. Therefore, the Company has not relied on projections of future taxable income in our assessment of the realization of deferred tax assets at December 31, 2022. The Company maintained a valuation allowance related to the German deferred tax assets of $3.9 million and $13.2 million, as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The Company maintained a valuation allowance related to the U.S. deferred tax assets of $82.5 million and $73.1 million, as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. For other jurisdictions there are no temporary differences to consider for the valuation allowance
Results of Operations
2019 Compared With 2018
Consolidated Operations
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Total Change | | Divestiture | | Operations | | Foreign Exchange |
| Net Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Industrial | $ | 450,706 |
| | $ | 487,576 |
| | $ | (36,870 | ) | | $ | (18,537 | ) | | $ | (1,203 | ) | | $ | (17,130 | ) |
| Aerospace & Defense | 272,625 |
| | 237,017 |
| | 35,608 |
| | — |
| | 39,133 |
| | (3,525 | ) |
| Energy | 240,982 |
| | 288,877 |
| | (47,895 | ) | | (62,507 | ) | | 16,483 |
| | (1,871 | ) |
| Consolidated Net Revenues | $ | 964,313 |
| | $ | 1,013,470 |
| | $ | (49,157 | ) | | $ | (81,044 | ) | | $ | 54,413 |
| | $ | (22,526 | ) |
Net revenues in 2019 were $964.3 million, a decrease of $(49.2) million from 2018 primarily driven by lower revenue as a result of divestitures $(81.0) million and unfavorable foreign exchange of $(22.5) million, partially offset by operational growth in all segments of $54.4 million.
Segment Results
The Chief Operating Decision Maker ("CODM") is the function that allocates the resources of the enterprise and assesses the performance of the Company's reportable operating segments. CIRCOR has determined that the CODM is solely comprised of its Chief Executive Officer ("CEO"), as the CEO has the ultimate responsibility for CIRCOR strategic decision-making and resource allocation.
Our CODM evaluates segment operating performance using segment operating income. We define segment operating income as GAAP operating income excluding intangible amortization and amortization of fair value step-ups of inventory and fixed assets from acquisitions completed subsequent to December 31, 2011, the impact of restructuring related inventory write-offs, impairment charges and special charges or gains. The Company also refers to this measure as adjusted operating income. The Company uses this measure because it helps management understand and evaluate the segments’ core operating results and facilitates a comparison of performance for determining incentive compensation achievement.
For information regarding our segment determination refer to Note 19, Business Segment and Geographical Information, of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
The following tables present information on net revenues and operating income of our business segments, along with a reconciliation of total segment operating income to the Company's consolidated operating income.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
| Net Revenues | | | | | |
| Industrial | $ | 450,706 |
| | $ | 487,576 |
| | $ | (36,870 | ) |
| Aerospace & Defense | 272,625 |
| | 237,017 |
| | 35,608 |
|
| Energy | 240,982 |
| | 288,877 |
| | (47,895 | ) |
| Consolidated Net Revenues | $ | 964,313 |
| | $ | 1,013,470 |
| | $ | (49,157 | ) |
| | | | | | |
| Operating Income | | | | | |
| Industrial - Segment Operating Income | $ | 52,188 |
| | $ | 57,340 |
| | $ | (5,152 | ) |
| Aerospace & Defense - Segment Operating Income | 52,480 |
| | 36,047 |
| | 16,433 |
|
| Energy - Segment Operating Income | 30,394 |
| | 38,779 |
| | (8,385 | ) |
| Corporate expenses | (25,262 | ) | | (30,299 | ) | | 5,037 |
|
| Subtotal | 109,800 |
| | 101,867 |
| | 7,933 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 5,186 |
| | 5,848 |
| | (662 | ) |
| Special charges, net | 17,686 |
| | 13,061 |
| | 4,625 |
|
| Special and restructuring charges, net (1) | 22,872 |
| | 18,909 |
| | 3,963 |
|
| Restructuring related inventory charges (1) | (820 | ) | | 346 |
| | (1,166 | ) |
| Amortization of inventory step-up | — |
| | 6,600 |
| | (6,600 | ) |
| Acquisition amortization | 45,715 |
| | 47,310 |
| | (1,595 | ) |
| Acquisition depreciation | 4,352 |
| | 7,049 |
| | (2,697 | ) |
| Restructuring and other costs | 49,247 |
| | 61,305 |
| | (12,058 | ) |
| Consolidated Operating Income | $ | 37,681 |
| | $ | 21,653 |
| | $ | 16,028 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Consolidated Operating Margin | 3.9 | % | | 2.1 | % | | |
| | | | | | |
| (1) See Note 6, Special and Restructuring charges, net of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, for additional details. |
Industrial For information regarding our segment determination refer to Note 18, Business Segment
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
| Net Revenues as reported | $ | 450,706 |
| | $ | 487,576 |
| | $ | (36,870 | ) |
| Net Revenues excluding divestiture (1) | 437,227 |
| | 455,560 |
| | (18,333 | ) |
| Segment Operating Income as reported | 52,188 |
| | 57,340 |
| | (5,152 | ) |
| Segment Operating Income excluding divestiture (2) | 48,701 |
| | 51,642 |
| | (2,941 | ) |
| Segment Operating Margin (adjusted) | 11.1 | % | | 11.3 | % | | |
| Orders | $ | 447,439 |
| | $ | 510,115 |
| | $ | (62,676 | ) |
| (1) Adjusted for the August 2019 divestiture of certain assets and liabilities related to our Spence and Nicholson product lines and the October 2018 divestiture of our Rosscor B.V. and SES International B.V. subsidiaries (the "Delden Business"). The Spence and Nicholson components generated revenues of $13.5 million and $20.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The Delden business generated revenues of $0.0 million and $11.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively. |
| (2) Adjusted for the August 2019 divestiture of certain assets and liabilities related to our Spence and Nicholson product lines, which contributed $3.5 million and $6.4 million to segment operating income for the year ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively, and for the divestiture of the Delden business, which contributed $0.0 million and ($0.7) million to segment operating income for the year ended December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively. |
Industrial segment net revenues, excluding divestitures, decreased $18.3 million, or (-4%), in 2019 compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by timing of projects in Europe and North American Pumps businesses ("Pumps Businesses") of (-4%).
Segment operating income, excluding divestitures, decreased $2.9 million, or (-6%), to $48.7 million for 2019 compared to $51.6 million for 2018, primarily driven by the Pumps Businesses (-14%), partially offset by the Valves businesses (+6%) along with operational efficiencies in headquarters.
Industrial segment orders, excluding divestitures, decreased $62.7 million, or (-12%), to $446.7 million for 2019 as compared to $510.1 million in 2018, driven by declines within our Pumps Businesses (-9%) and Valves Businesses (-3%).
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| QUARTERLY INDUSTRIAL SEGMENT INFORMATION |
| (in thousands, except percentages) |
| (unaudited) |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 | 2019 |
| | 1ST QTR | 2ND QTR | 3RD QTR | 4TH QTR | TOTAL | 1ST QTR | 2ND QTR | 3RD QTR | 4TH QTR | TOTAL |
| Orders | 136,607 | 136,746 | 114,876 | 121,886 | 510,115 | 123,746 | 120,660 | 105,710 | 97,323 | 447,439 |
| Net Revenues | 117,131 | 131,064 | 118,734 | 120,647 | 487,576 | 110,738 | 119,322 | 113,596 | 107,050 | 450,706 |
| Operating Income | 12,948 | 15,037 | 14,609 | 14,746 | 57,340 | 10,787 | 16,138 | 13,953 | 11,310 | 52,188 |
| Operating Margin | 11.1% | 11.5% | 12.3% | 12.2% | 11.8% | 9.7% | 13.5% | 12.3% | 10.6% | 11.6% |
| Backlog (1) | 170,568 | 167,325 | 178,044 | 163,801 | 163,801 | 174,228 | 175,717 | 159,056 | 152,084 | 152,084 |
| (1) At end of period. | | | | | | | | |
Aerospace & Defense Segment
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
| Net Revenues | $ | 272,625 |
| | $ | 237,017 |
| | $ | 35,608 |
|
| Segment Operating Income | 52,480 |
| | 36,047 |
| | 16,433 |
|
| Segment Operating Margin | 19.2 | % | | 15.2 | % | | |
| Orders | $ | 313,939 |
| | $ | 277,469 |
| | $ | 36,470 |
|
Aerospace & Defense segment net revenues increased by $35.6 million, or 15%, in 2019 as compared to 2018. The increase was driven by our Defense businesses (+10%) and our Aerospace businesses (+5%).
Segment operating income increased $16.4 million, or 46%, to $52.5 million for 2019 compared to $36.0 million for 2018. The increase in operating income was driven by our Defense businesses (+25%) and our Aerospace businesses (21%).
Aerospace & Defense segment orders increased $36.5 million, or 13%, to $313.9 million for 2019 compared to $277.5 million in 2018, driven by our Defense businesses (+10%) and our Aerospace businesses (+3%).
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| QUARTERLY A&D SEGMENT INFORMATION |
| (in thousands, except percentages) |
| (unaudited) |
| | 2018 | 2019 |
| | 1ST QTR | 2ND QTR | 3RD QTR | 4TH QTR | TOTAL | 1ST QTR | 2ND QTR | 3RD QTR | 4TH QTR | TOTAL |
| Orders | 59,793 | 59,441 | 81,533 | 76,702 | 277,469 | 88,107 | 93,405 | 63,968 | 68,459 | 313,939 |
| Net Revenues | 58,477 | 57,500 | 57,757 | 63,283 | 237,017 | 61,240 | 64,694 | 67,621 | 79,070 | 272,625 |
| Operating Income | 8,931 | 6,992 | 8,709 | 11,415 | 36,047 | 9,374 | 10,443 | 13,564 | 19,099 | 52,480 |
| Operating Margin | 15.3% | 12.2% | 15.1% | 18.0% | 15.2% | 15.3% | 16.1% | 20.1% | 24.2% | 19.2% |
| Backlog (1) | 165,841 | 152,081 | 150,571 | 156,256 | 156,256 | 206,457 | 234,964 | 206,917 | 194,459 | 194,459 |
| (1) At end of period. |
Energy Segment
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
| Net Revenues as reported | $ | 240,982 |
| | $ | 288,877 |
| | $ | (47,895 | ) |
| Net Revenues excluding divestiture (1) | 237,876 |
| | 223,264 |
| | $ | 14,612 |
|
| Segment Operating Income as reported | 30,394 |
| | 38,779 |
| | (8,385 | ) |
| Segment Operating Income excluding divestiture (2) | 30,394 |
| | 32,183 |
| | (1,789 | ) |
| Segment Operating Margin (adjusted) | 12.8 | % | | 14.4 | % | | |
| Orders | $ | 216,114 |
| | $ | 311,626 |
| | $ | (95,512 | ) |
| (1) Adjusted for the January 2019 divestiture of our Reliability Services business, which generated revenues of $3.1 million and $65.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. |
| (2) Adjusted for the January 2019 divestiture of our Reliability Services business, which contributed $0.0 million and $6.6 million to segment operating income for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. |
Energy segment net revenues, excluding divestiture, increased $14.6 million, or 7%, in 2019 compared to 2018. The increase was primarily driven by organic growth in our Refinery Valves business (+7%) and Pipeline business (+2%), partially offset by declines within our Instrumentation and Sampling business (-1%), and unfavorable foreign currency fluctuations (-1%). The Instrumentation and Sampling business was sold in January 2020. See Note 1, Description of Business,Geographical Information, of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
2022 Compared With 2021
Consolidated Operations | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 | | Total
Change | | | | | | Operations | | Foreign
Exchange |
| Net Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Industrial | $ | 504,204 | | | $ | 506,126 | | | $ | (1,922) | | | | | | | $ | 32,964 | | | $ | (34,886) | |
| Aerospace & Defense | 282,715 | | | 252,541 | | | 30,174 | | | | | | | 38,211 | | | (8,037) | |
| Consolidated Net Revenues | $ | 786,919 | | | $ | 758,667 | | | $ | 28,252 | | | | | | | $ | 71,175 | | | $ | (42,923) | |
Net revenues in 2022 were $786.9 million, an increase of $28.3 million from 2021 from improved operational results of $71.2 million driven primarily by improved pricing and increased volume, partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange of $42.9 million.
Segment Results | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| Net Revenues | | | | | |
| Industrial | $ | 504,204 | | | $ | 506,126 | | | $ | (1,922) | |
| Aerospace & Defense | 282,715 | | | 252,541 | | | 30,174 | |
| Consolidated Net Revenues | $ | 786,919 | | | $ | 758,667 | | | $ | 28,252 | |
| | | | | |
| Operating Income | | | | | |
| Industrial - Segment Operating Income | $ | 49,302 | | | $ | 28,896 | | | $ | 20,406 | |
| Aerospace & Defense - Segment Operating Income | 63,584 | | | 56,073 | | | 7,511 | |
| Corporate expenses | (25,384) | | | (30,638) | | | 5,254 | |
| Subtotal | 87,502 | | | 54,331 | | | 33,171 | |
| Special restructuring charges | 11,066 | | | 4,234 | | | 6,832 | |
| Special other (recoveries) charges, net | (30,079) | | | 20,038 | | | (50,117) | |
| Special and restructuring (recoveries) charges, net (1) | (19,013) | | | 24,272 | | | (43,285) | |
| Restructuring related inventory charges (recoveries), net | 2,757 | | | 599 | | | 2,158 | |
| Goodwill impairment charges | — | | | 10,500 | | | (10,500) | |
| Acquisition amortization | 36,338 | | | 41,772 | | | (5,434) | |
| Acquisition depreciation | 4,614 | | | 6,511 | | | (1,897) | |
| Restructuring, impairment and other cost, net | 43,709 | | | 59,382 | | | (15,673) | |
| Consolidated Operating Income (Loss) | $ | 62,806 | | | $ | (29,323) | | | $ | 92,129 | |
| | | | | |
| Consolidated Operating Margin | 8.0 | % | | (3.9) | % | | |
| | | | | |
| (1) See Note 5, Special and Restructuring (Recoveries) Charges, net in the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, for additional details. |
Industrial Segment
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| Net Revenues as reported | $ | 504,204 | | | $ | 506,126 | | | $ | (1,922) | |
| | | | | |
| Segment Operating Income as reported | 49,302 | | | 28,896 | | | 20,406 | |
| | | | | |
| Segment Operating Margin as reported | 9.8 | % | | 5.7 | % | | |
| Orders | $ | 599,014 | | | $ | 595,410 | | | $ | 3,604 | |
| | | | | |
|
|
Industrial segment revenues decreased $1.9 million, or less than 1%, in 2022 compared to 2021. A minimal increase in the Pumps businesses was offset by a decrease of 1% in the Valves businesses. Segment revenues, excluding the impact of the exited Pipeline Engineering business and unfavorable foreign exchange, increased $44.2 million or 9% largely driven by value-based pricing initiatives.
Industrial segment operating income increased $20.4 million, or 71%, in 2022 compared to 2021. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in the Valves businesses which was largely due to the exit of the loss-making Pipeline Engineering business and improved pricing offsetting increased material and freight inflation.
Industrial segment orders increased $3.6 million, or 1%, in 2022 compared to 2021. The increase was primarily driven by a 9% increase in the Pumps businesses partially offset by a 12% decrease in the Valves businesses. Segment orders, excluding the impact of the exited Pipeline Engineering business and unfavorable foreign exchange, increased $66.0 million, or 12%, in 2022 compared to 2021.
Aerospace & Defense Segment
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands, except percentages) | 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| Net Revenues | $ | 282,715 | | | $ | 252,541 | | | $ | 30,174 | |
| Segment Operating Income | 63,584 | | | 56,073 | | | 7,511 | |
| Segment Operating Margin | 22.5 | % | | 22.2 | % | | |
| Orders | $ | 308,207 | | | $ | 255,168 | | | $ | 53,039 | |
Aerospace & Defense segment net revenues increased by $30.2 million, or 12% in 2022 compared to 2021. The increase was primarily driven by a 33% increase in the Commercial Aerospace businesses partially offset by a 1% decrease in the Defense businesses. Segment revenue excluding the impact of foreign exchange increased $38.2 million, or 15%, in 2022 compared to 2021.
Segment operating income excluding divestiture, decreased $1.8increased $7.5 million, or (-6%)13%, to $30.4 million for 2019in 2022 compared to $32.2 million in 2018.
Energy segment orders decreased $95.5 million, or (-31%), to $216.1 million for 2019 compared to $311.6 million in 2018,2021. The increase was primarily driven by higher volume in the divestitureCommercial Aerospace business combined with improved pricing offsetting material and freight inflation.
Aerospace & Defense segment orders increased $53.0 million, or 21%, in 2022 compared to 2021. The increase was driven by a 27% and 17% increase in our Commercial Aerospace and Defense businesses, respectively. Segment orders excluding the impact of our Reliability Services business (-21%) andforeign exchange increased $62.3 million, or 24%, in comparison2022 compared to a strong 2018 order book within our Refinery Valves business (-9%).2021.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| QUARTERLY ENERGY SEGMENT INFORMATION |
| (in thousands, except percentages) |
| (unaudited) |
| | 2018 | 2019 |
| | 1ST QTR | 2ND QTR | 3RD QTR | 4TH QTR | TOTAL | 1ST QTR | 2ND QTR | 3RD QTR | 4TH QTR | TOTAL |
| Orders | 85,336 | 66,825 | 87,146 | 72,319 | 311,626 | 48,088 | 43,982 | 53,276 | 70,768 | 216,114 |
| Net Revenues | 64,279 | 71,094 | 70,718 | 82,786 | 288,877 | 66,876 | 61,752 | 55,835 | 56,519 | 240,982 |
| Operating Income | 5,627 | 10,691 | 9,726 | 12,735 | 38,779 | 9,978 | 8,343 | 5,286 | 6,787 | 30,394 |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 15.0% | 13.8% | 15.4% | 13.4% | 14.9% | 13.5% | 9.5% | 12.0% | 12.6% |
| Backlog (1) | 112,336 | 106,190 | 121,600 | 110,498 | 110,498 | 80,714 | 62,364 | 59,309 | 74,124 | 74,124 |
| (1) at end of period. |
Corporate Expenses
Corporate expenses decreased $5.0$5.3 million to $25.3$25.4 million for 2019. This2022. The decrease was primarily driven largely by ongoing cost savings initiatives resulting in lower professional fees, variable compensation and integrationbenefit costs.
Special and Restructuring charges,(Recoveries) Charges, net
During 2019,2022, the Company recorded a total of $22.9$19.0 million in special and restructuring recoveries compared to $24.3 million of Specialcharges in 2021. The recoveries recorded in 2022 were due to the gain on real estate sales partially offset by the Pipeline Engineering investigation and restructuring charges.restatement costs, debt amendment charges and the strategic alternative evaluation. The charges recorded in 2021 were related to debt refinancing, the sale of two Industrial product lines, the write off of an aged receivable, and cost saving initiatives. In our consolidated statements of (loss) income,operations, these charges are recorded in Specialspecial and restructuring charges (recoveries), net. These costs are primarily related to our simplificationspecial and restructuring efforts, as well as cost relating to an unsolicited tender offer to acquire the Company. These restructuring charges and other special(recoveries) charges are described in further detail in Note 6,5, Special and Restructuring charges,(Recoveries) Charges, net, ofin the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Restructuring, impairment and other costs, net
During 2019,2022, the Company recorded a total of $49.2$43.7 million of Restructuringrestructuring and other costs. Thesecosts, net, including $2.8 million of restructuring related inventory charges in our Industrial business. The remaining charges represent plant, property, and equipment depreciation related to the step-up in fair value as part of our acquisition of Colfax Corporation's Fluid Handling ("FH"(“FH”) business and intangible amortization in connection with acquisitions subsequent to December 31, 2011, and step-up in fair value of inventory acquired as part of our FH acquisition.2011. These charges are recorded in either selling, general and administrative expenses or cost of revenues based upon the nature of the underlying asset.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, decreased $4.4net increased $12.5 million from 2021 to $48.6$44.9 million for 2019.in 2022. The change in interest expense was primarily due to lowerhigher debt balances and our net investment hedge, partially offset by an increase inincreased interest rates.rates throughout the year.
Other Income, Net
Other income, net was $0.8$5.7 million for 20192022 compared to $7.4$3.8 million in 2018.for 2021. The difference of $6.6$1.9 million increase primarily relates to netfavorable exchange rates partially offset with lower returns on pension income for the retirement plans we acquired as part of the FH acquisition. Effective January 1, 2018 allassets and increased pension gains and losses are recorded in the Other (Income) Expense, net caption on our consolidated statement of (loss) income. In addition we experienced lower gains from foreign exchange in 2019 compared to 2018.interest costs.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) Income
Comprehensive lossincome increased $72.1$45.4 million, from a comprehensive loss position of $72.4$21.3 million for the year-ended December 31, 20182021 to a comprehensive loss positionincome of $144.5$24.1 million for the year-ended December 31, 2019.2022. This change was primarily driven by ana $81.0 million increase in net income caused by a higher revenue, decrease of $10.5 million impairment of goodwill, a $0.9 million decrease in our income tax provision and a $1.4 million decrease in net loss of $103.1 million infrom our discontinued operations, a $43.3 million increase in special and restructuring recoveries, partially offset by $15.8a $20.5 million of lower negative effects ofdecrease in pension related actuarial gains and a $8.1 million change in foreign currency translation and reduced losses in our continuing operations of $8.6 million, as compared to the prior year.adjustments.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had a cumulative currency translation adjustment of $18.2$18.6 million regardingin Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss for our Brazil entity. If we were to cease to have a controlling financial interest in the Brazil entity or otherwise satisfy criteria for reclassification of the amount from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss to earnings, we would incurrecognize a non-cash charge of $18.2$18.6 million based on December 31, 2022 balances, which would be included as a special charge within the consolidated statementsstatement of (loss) income.
(Benefit from)
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
The table below outlines the change in effective tax rate for 20192022 and 20182021 (in thousands, except percentages).
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | Change |
| Income (Loss) Before Tax | $23,667 | | $(57,862) | | $81,529 |
| | | | | |
| Expected federal income tax rate | 21.0% | | 21.0% | | —% |
| State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit | (10.3) | | (0.3) | | (10.0) |
| | | | | |
| US permanent differences | 2.3 | | (1.7) | | 4.0 |
| Foreign tax rate differential | (4.8) | | 3.7 | | (8.5) |
| Maturity of Interest Rate Swap | (10.7) | | — | | (10.7) |
| Tax reserve | (1.5) | | (2.6) | | 1.1 |
| Rate Change | — | | (1.7) | | 1.7 |
| GILTI | 5.3 | | — | | 5.3 |
| | | | | |
| Prior period adjustment | 6.2 | | 0.2 | | 6.0 |
| Dispositions | — | | (1.0) | | 1.0 |
| Valuation Allowance | 11.9 | | (24.7) | | 36.6 |
| Other, net | 1.3 | | (5.2) | | 6.5 |
| Equity compensation | 0.6 | | 2.0 | | (1.4) |
| Research and development | (3.2) | | 1.3 | | (4.5) |
| Effective tax rate | 18.1% | | (9.0)% | | 27.1% |
The Company recognized a valuation allowance for the German and the U.S. net DTAs to the extent of reversing DTLs during the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company continued to maintain a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets in Germany and the U.S. as both jurisdictions remain in a cumulative three year loss position at December 31, 2022. The Company concluded that the negative evidence associated with the history of losses outweighed any positive evidence as of December 31, 2022. Therefore, the Company has not relied on projections of future taxable income in our assessment of the realization of deferred tax assets at December 31, 2022. The Company calculated the valuation allowance based on the reversal of temporary differences. The Company maintained a valuation allowance related to the German deferred tax assets of $3.9 million and $13.2 million, as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The Company maintained a valuation allowance related to the U.S. deferred tax assets of $82.5 million and $73.1 million, as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. For other jurisdictions there are no temporary differences to consider for the valuation allowance.
As of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company maintained a total valuation allowance of $127.4 million and $139 million, respectively, which relates to foreign, federal, and state deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. This decrease is partially due to the removal of the United Kingdom deferred tax asset of $8.7 million related to Pipeline UK and the deconsolidation. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced or increased or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight is given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth.
|
| | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | Change |
| Income/ (Loss) Before Tax | $(10,092) | | $(23,896) | | $13,804 |
| | | | | | |
| US tax rate | 21.0% | | 21.0% | | —% |
| State taxes | 15.5% | | 3.8% | | 11.7% |
| US permanent differences | (1.6)% | | (1.0)% | | (0.6)% |
| Foreign tax rate differential | (26.0)% | | (7.6)% | | (18.4)% |
| Unbenefited foreign losses | (0.5)% | | (5.5)% | | 5.0% |
| Global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") impact | (3.9)% | | (20.7)% | | 16.8% |
| Intercompany financing | 30.4% | | 12.7% | | 17.7% |
| Foreign tax credit write off | —% | | (45.6)% | | 45.6% |
| Tax reserve | (0.3)% | | 1.3% | | (1.6)% |
| Rate change | 5.9% | | —% | | 5.9% |
| Foreign-derived intangible income ("FDII") | 10.7% | | 0.1% | | 10.6% |
| Dispositions | (227.0)% | | —% | | (227.0)% |
| Prior period adjustment | 44.1% | | 4.3% | | 39.8% |
| Equity compensation | (10.8)% | | (4.2)% | | (6.6)% |
| R&D credits | 13.1% | | 2.7% | | 10.4% |
| Other | (16.0)% | | (0.8)% | | (15.2)% |
| Total | (145.4)% | | (39.5)% | | (105.9)% |
Results of Operations
20182021 Compared With 20172020
Consolidated Operations
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2018 | | 2017 | | Total Change | | Acquisitions | | Operations | | Foreign Exchange |
| Net Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Industrial | $ | 487,576 |
| | $ | 139,110 |
| | $ | 348,466 |
| | $ | 344,456 |
| | $ | 1,911 |
| | $ | 2,099 |
|
| Aerospace & Defense | 237,017 |
| | 182,983 |
| | 54,034 |
| | 46,929 |
| | 4,669 |
| | 2,436 |
|
| Energy | 288,877 |
| | 183,399 |
| | 105,478 |
| | 57,290 |
| | 47,068 |
| | 1,120 |
|
| Consolidated Net Revenues | $ | 724,593 |
| | $ | 322,093 |
| | $ | 402,500 |
| | $ | 391,385 |
| | $ | 6,580 |
| | $ | 4,535 |
|
Net revenuesComparisons between prior year periods can be found in 2018 were $1.0 billion, an increase of $508.0 million from 2017. The increase in net revenue was primarily driven by our acquisition of the FH business, which contributed $448.7 million in net revenues, along with operations increases of $53.6 million and favorable foreign exchange increase of $5.7 million.
Segment Results
The following table present information on net revenues and operating income of our business segments, along with a reconciliation of total segment operating income to the Company's consolidated operating income.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | 2018 | | 2017 | | Change |
| Net Revenues | | | | | |
| Industrial | $ | 487,576 |
| | $ | 139,110 |
| | $ | 348,466 |
|
| Aerospace & Defense | 237,017 |
| | 182,983 |
| | 54,034 |
|
| Energy | 288,877 |
| | 183,399 |
| | 105,478 |
|
| Consolidated Net Revenues | $ | 1,013,470 |
| | $ | 505,492 |
| | $ | 507,978 |
|
| | | | | |
|
| Operating Income | | | | |
|
| Industrial - Segment Operating Income | $ | 57,340 |
| | $ | 19,932 |
| | $ | 37,408 |
|
| A&D - Segment Operating Income | 36,047 |
| | 23,375 |
| | 12,672 |
|
| Energy - Segment Operating Income | 38,779 |
| | 21,708 |
| | 17,071 |
|
| Corporate expenses | (30,299 | ) | | (21,744 | ) | | (8,555 | ) |
| Subtotal | 101,867 |
| | 43,271 |
| | 58,596 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 5,848 |
| | 2,559 |
| | 3,289 |
|
| Special charges, net | 13,061 |
| | 7,330 |
| | 5,731 |
|
| Special and restructuring charges, net (1) | 18,909 |
| | 9,889 |
| | 9,020 |
|
| Restructuring related inventory charges (1) | 346 |
| | — |
| | 346 |
|
| Amortization of inventory step-up | 6,600 |
| | 4,300 |
| | 2,300 |
|
| Impairment charges | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Acquisition amortization | 47,310 |
| | 12,542 |
| | 34,768 |
|
| Acquisition depreciation | 7,049 |
| | 233 |
| | 6,816 |
|
| Restructuring and other cost, net | 61,305 |
| | 17,075 |
| | 44,230 |
|
| Consolidated Operating Income | $ | 21,653 |
| | $ | 16,307 |
| | $ | 5,346 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Consolidated Operating Margin | 2.1 | % | | 3.2 | % | | |
| | | | | | |
| (1) See Note 6, Special and Restructuring charges, net of the consolidated financial statements, for additional details. |
| Refer to our Annual Report Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 1, 2019 for further discussion of our 2018 results in comparison with 2017. |
Corporate Expenses
Corporate expenses increased $8.6 million to $30.3 million for 2018. This increase was primarily driven by higher variable compensation costs, professional fees and integration costs.
Special and Restructuring charges, net and other charges
During 2018, the Company recorded a total of $18.9 million of Special and restructuring charges. In our consolidated statement of (loss) income, these charges are recorded in Special and restructuring charges, net. These costs are primarily related to our simplification and restructuring efforts. These restructuring charges and other special charges are described in further detail in Note 6, Special and Restructuring charges, net, of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Restructuring and other costs
During 2018, the Company recorded a total of $61.3 million of Restructuring and other costs. These charges represent plant, property, and equipment depreciation related to the step-up in fair value as part of our FH acquisition, intangible amortization in connection with acquisitions subsequent to December 31, 2011, and step-up in fair value of inventory acquired as part of our FH acquisition. These charges are recorded in either selling, general, and administrative expenses or cost of revenues based upon the nature of the underlying asset.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense increased $42.1 million to $52.9 million for 2018. This change in interest expense was primarily due to higher outstanding debt balances as a result of our acquisition of FH during the fourth quarter of 2017.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
Other income, net, was $7.4 million for 2018 compared to other expense, net of $1.8 million in 2017. The difference of $9.3 million primarily relates to net pension incomeReport on Form 10-K for the retirement plans we acquired as part of the FH acquisition. Effective January 1, 2018 all pension gains and losses are to be recorded in the Other (Income) Expense, net caption on our consolidated statement of (loss) income. In addition, we had gains resulting from changes in foreign currency in 2018, whereas in 2017 we had losses resulting from changes in foreign currency.
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive (loss) income decreased $123.7 million, from comprehensive income of $51.3 million for the year-ended December 31, 2017 to comprehensive loss of $(72.4) million for the year-ended December 31, 2018. This decrease is primarily driven by a year-over-year decrease of $55 million in foreign currency translation, as the Company had $(21) million in unfavorable foreign currency translation in 2018 compared to favorable foreign currency translation of $34 million in 2017, and a $51 million year-over-year decrease in net (loss) income.
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act includes significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system including: a federal corporate rate reduction from 35% to 21%; limitations on the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation; creation of the base erosion anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”), a new minimum tax; global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI"); and the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a modified territorial tax system. The change to a modified territorial tax system resulted in a one-time U.S. tax liability on those earnings which have not previously been repatriated to the U.S. (the “Transition Tax”), with future distributions not subject to U.S. federal income tax when repatriated. A majority of the provisions in the Tax Act are effective January 1, 2018 and have been reflected in our financial statements. With respect to GILTI, the Company has adopted a policy to account for this provision as a period cost.
In response to the Tax Act, the SEC staff issued guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act. The guidance provided a one-year measurement period for companies to complete the accounting.
In connection with the impact of the Tax Act, we had recorded a $0.5 million net tax benefit for the periodFiscal Year ended December 31, 2017. This benefit consists of zero net expense for the Transition Tax liability, and $0.5 million benefit from the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets/liabilities due to the corporate rate reduction. The Company did not owe the one-time Transition Tax2021.
liability, based on foreign tax pools that are in excess of U.S. tax rates. The impact of the Tax Act resulted in a valuation allowance on a portion of our U.S. foreign tax credit carryforwards (deferred tax asset), in the amount of $10.9 million of expense which was recorded in 2018.
The table below outlines the change in effective tax rate for 2018 and 2017 (in thousands, except percentages).
|
| | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | Change |
| Income/ (Loss) Before Tax | $(23,896) | | $3,640 | | $(27,536) |
| | | | | | |
| US tax rate | 21.0% | | 35.0% | | (14.0)% |
| State taxes | 3.8% | | (5.7)% | | 9.5% |
| US permanent differences | (1.0)% | | 22.7% | | (23.7)% |
| Foreign tax rate differential | (7.6)% | | (66.4)% | | 58.8% |
| Unbenefited foreign losses | (5.5)% | | —% | | (5.5)% |
| Rate change | —% | | (13.9)% | | 13.9% |
| GILTI impact | (20.7)% | | —% | | (20.7)% |
| FDII | 0.1% | | —% | | 0.1% |
| Dispositions | —% | | 4.7% | | (4.7)% |
| Foreign tax credit writeoff | (45.6)% | | —% | | (45.6)% |
| Tax reserve | 1.3% | | (27.0)% | | 28.3% |
| Prior period adjustment | 4.3% | | (0.6)% | | 4.9% |
| R&D | 2.7% | | (14.0)% | | 16.7% |
| Equity compensation | (4.2)% | | (2.7)% | | (1.5)% |
| Intercompany financing | 12.7% | | (17.8)% | | 30.5% |
| Release of contingent consideration | —% | | (113.9)% | | 113.9% |
| Other | (0.8)% | | 3.9% | | (4.7)% |
| Total | (39.5)% | | (195.7)% | | 156.2% |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity needs arise primarily from capital investment in machinery, equipment and the improvement of facilities, funding working capital requirements to support business growth initiatives, acquisitions, and debt service costs.costs, and acquisitions. We have historically generated cash from operations and remain in a strong financial position, with resources available for reinvestment in existing businesses strategic acquisitions and managing our capital structure on a short and long-term basis.
We completedCash Flow Activities for the acquisition of FH onYear Ended December 11, 2017. The total consideration paid31, 2022 Compared to acquire FH consisted of $542 million in cash, 3,283,424 unregistered shares of our common stock and the assumption of net pension and post-retirement liabilities of FH. We financed the cash consideration through a combination of committed debt financing and cash on hand. Refer to Note 5, Business Acquisitions, of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report, for details. As a result of the transaction we incurred significant debt, including secured indebtedness, as described below. Since January 2017, we have completed several asset sales with proceeds over $340 million. Net proceeds from these transactions have been used to reduce indebtedness as described below.Year Ended December 31, 2021
The following table summarizes our cash flow activities for the year-ended indicated (in thousands):
| | | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Cash flow provided by (used in): | | | | | | Cash flow provided by (used in): | | | | | |
| Operating activities | $ | 15,913 |
| | $ | 53,994 |
| | $ | 9,637 |
| Operating activities | $ | (821) | | | $ | 10,448 | | | $ | (22,481) | |
| Investing activities | 153,036 |
| | (16,877 | ) | | (502,124 | ) | Investing activities | 37,545 | | | (2,705) | | | 144,295 | |
| Financing activities | (152,944 | ) | | (74,073 | ) | | 535,568 |
| Financing activities | (26,466) | | | (11,528) | | | (134,139) | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 197 |
| | (5,812 | ) | | 8,996 |
| |
| Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (1) | $ | 16,202 |
| | $ | (42,768 | ) | | $ | 52,077 |
| |
| (1) Pursuant to the terms of the FH purchase agreement, $64.5 million of the cash balance as of December 31, 2017 was due back to Colfax Corporation (“Colfax”), which has been reflected as a current liability within the December 31, 2017 balance sheet. Amounts were fully settled during 2018. | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | | Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | (4,908) | | | (3,448) | | | 3,878 | |
| Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | | Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash | $ | 5,350 | | | $ | (7,233) | | | $ | (8,447) | |
| |
Cash Flow Activities forDuring the Year Endedyear ended December 31, 2019 Compared2022, cash used in operating activities was $0.8 million compared to $10.4 million provided during the Year Endedyear ended December 31, 20182021. The $11.3 million decrease in operating cash flows was primarily driven by an increase in inventories due to relief of previous supply chain disruptions as well as prepaid assets.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we generated $15.92022, cash provided by investing activities was $37.5 million in cash flow from operating activities compared to $54.0$2.7 million used during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The $38.1$40.3 million decreaseincrease in operatinginvesting cash flows was primarily driven by higherthe cash taxes, higher working capitalreceived from the sale of two properties within the Industrial segment located in Walden, New York and cash used by discontinued operations.Tampa, Florida and one property within the Aerospace and Defense segment in Corona, California.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we generated $153.02022, cash used in financing activities was $26.5 million for investing activities compared to cash$11.5 million used of $16.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The $169.9$14.9 million year over year increase in cash provided was primarily driven by cash proceeds from the sale of certain assets and liabilities related to Spence and Nicholson products lines for $84.5 million and the sale of the RS business for approximately $85 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we used $152.9 million in cash from financing activities as compared to cash used of $74.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. The $78.9 million year over year increase in cash used byin financing activities resulted fromis driven by $14.0 million higher debt payments, to reduce long-term debt.$4.5 million increase in debt issuance costs, partially offset by $4.0 million in failed sales leaseback proceeds and $2.9 million of lower tax withholding on share based plans.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, total debt (including current portion) was $636.3$496.5 million compared to $786.0$513.3 million at December 31, 2018.2021. Total debt is net of unamortized term loandebt discount and debt issuance costs of $17.6$20.4 million and $21.0$13.0 million at December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively. Total debt as a percentage of total shareholders’ equity was 163%312% as of December 31, 20192022 compared to 149%384% as of December 31, 2018.2021. As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had available capacity to borrow an additional $115.7$48.3 million under our revolving credit facility.
We entered into a new secured Credit Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2021 (“Credit Agreement”), which provides for a $100.0 million revolving line of credit with a five year maturity and a $530.0 million term loan with a seven year maturity of which the term loan was funded in full at closing. This Credit Agreement replaced and terminated the Credit Agreement dated December 11, 2017 (“Prior Credit Agreement”) under which the Company had borrowings of $492.0 million on its term loan and $38.7 million on its revolving line of credit as of December 20, 2021. The Company amended its Credit Agreement with the First Amendment on April 8, 2022 and the Second Amendment on May 27, 2022. For further discussion of both amendments, see Note 12, Financing Arrangements.
The Credit Agreement contains covenants that require, among other items, maintenance of certain financial ratios and also limits our ability to: enter into secured and unsecured borrowing arrangements; issue dividends to shareholders; acquire and dispose of businesses; invest in capital equipment; transfer assets among domestic and international entities; participate in certain higher yielding long-term investment vehicles; and issue certain types of additional shares of our stock which limits our ability to borrow under the credit facility. The primary financial covenant is total net leverage, a ratio of total secured debt (less cash and cash equivalents up to a maximum of $75.0 million) to total earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation, and amortization based on the four fiscal quarters at the testing period.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had $27.4 million borrowings of $636.3 million outstanding under our revolving credit facility, $489.6 million gross borrowings under our term loan, and $42.0$32.4 million borrowings outstanding under letters of credit.
We were in compliance with all financial covenants related to our existing debt obligationsthe Credit Agreement at December 31, 20192022 and we believe it is likely that we will continue to meet such covenants for at least the next twelve months from date of issuance of the financial statements.
The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.4:2.2:1 at December 31, 20192022 compared to 2.3:2.0:1 at December 31, 2018.2021. As of December 31, 2019,2022, cash and cash equivalents totaled $84.5$64.3 million, andthe majority of which was substantially all held in foreign bank accounts. This compares to $68.5$59.9 million of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2018,2021, with balances all substantially held in foreign bank accounts. The cash and cash equivalents located at our foreign subsidiaries may notThese funds are considered indefinitely reinvested to be repatriatedused to expand operations either organically or through acquisitions outside of the United States or other jurisdictions without significant tax implications. On a provisional basis, the Company does not expect to owe the one-time Transition Tax liability, based on foreign tax pools that are in excess of U.S. tax rates. We believe that our U.S. based subsidiaries, in the aggregate, will generate positive operating cash flows and in addition we may utilize our Credit Agreement for U.S. based cash needs.States.
In 2020,2023, we expect to generate positive cash flow from operating activities sufficient to support our capital expenditures and service our debt. Based on our expected cash flows from operations and contractually available borrowings under our credit facility, we expect to have sufficient liquidity to fund working capital needs and future growth over at least the next twelve months from March 15, 2023 the date of filing the 2019these 2022 financial statements.
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19, which continues to spread throughout the U.S. and the world, as a pandemic. The outbreak is having an impact on the global economy, resulting in rapidly changing market and economic conditions, which may impact the Company. Subsequent to year end and through the date of this filing, the Company has experienced a significant decline in its market capitalization to approximately 35% (based on the closing market price at March 26, 2019) below its consolidated book value. As a result, management has concluded that there was a goodwill and an intangible asset impairment triggering event for the Company in the first quarter of 2020, which will result in management performing an impairment evaluation of its goodwill and intangible asset balances. The decline in market capitalization and any prolonged material disruption of our employees, distributors, suppliers or customers can reasonably be expected to negatively impact our global sales and operating results and could lead to valuation allowances or impairments of our goodwill or intangible assets, which were 271.9 million and 385.5 million million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019.
Given the continued uncertainty surrounding COVID-19, on March 20, 2020, the Company executed an $80 million drawdownof its remaining available line of credit under its existing Credit Agreement. The Company took this action as a precautionary measure to increase the Company’s cash position and help maintain financial flexibility. The proceeds from the drawdown will be available to be used for working capital, general corporate or other purposes.
On February 26, 2020, the Company amended its term loan to lower the interest rate associated with the applicable margin calculation. The new terms lower the interest rate on the Company's term loan from LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 3.5% to LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 3.25%, based on its existing corporate family rating from Moody's. The applicable margin reduces to LIBOR plus an applicable margin of 3.00%, with a corporate family rating from Moody's of B1 or better.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to sell its non-core Instrumentation and Sampling ("I&S") business to Crane Co. for $172 million, in cash, subject to working capital adjustments. The transaction closed on January 31, 2020. The I&S business manufactures valves, fittings, regulators and sampling systems primarily serving energy end markets. We expect to record a gain on the I&S sale during the first quarter of 2020 in the range of $35 million to $40 million.
Cash Flow Activities for the Year Ended December 31, 20182021 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 20172020
DuringComparisons between prior year periods can be found in the yearCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2018, we generated $54.0 million in cash flow from operating activities compared to $9.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The $44.4 million increase in operating cash was primarily driven by $26.9 million of working capital changes primarily due to improved management of inventory and cash collection on outstanding trade receivables and higher cash related earnings of $17.5 million.2021.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we used $16.9 million for investing activities as compared to $502.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The $485.2 million year over year decrease in cash used was primarily driven by our purchase of the FH business in December of 2017.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, we used $74.1 million from financing activities as compared to cash generated of $535.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. The $609.6 million year over year decrease in cash generated from financing activities was primarily related to our purchase of the FH business. On December 11, 2017, we borrowed $785.0 million under a new term loan and entered into a new $150.0 million revolving line of credit on which we drew $40.0 million.
Proceeds from these borrowings were used to fund the acquisition of FH and repay $97.5 million and $176.0 million of outstanding debt under our previous term loan and revolving line of credit, respectively.
As of December 31, 2018, total debt (including current portion) was $786.0 million compared to $795.2 million at December 31, 2017. Total debt is net of unamortized term loan debt issuance costs of $21.0 million and $23.7 million at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Total debt as a percentage of total shareholders’ equity was 149% as of December 31, 2018 compared to 132% as of December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, we had available capacity to borrow an additional $84.5 million under our revolving credit facility.
As a result of a significant portion of our cash balances being denominated in Euros, the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar resulted in a $5.8 million increase in reported cash balances.
As of December 31, 2018, we had borrowings of $786.0 million outstanding under our credit facility and $70.7 million outstanding under letters of credit.
We were in compliance with all financial covenants related to our existing debt obligations at December 31, 2018.
The ratio of current assets to current liabilities was 2.3:1 at December 31, 2018 compared to 2.0:1 at December 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2018, cash and cash equivalents totaled $68.5 million and was substantially all held in foreign bank accounts. This compares to $110.4 million of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2017, of which $65.3 million was payable to Colfax Corporation with balances all substantially held in foreign bank accounts. The cash and cash equivalents located at our foreign subsidiaries may not be repatriated to the United States or other jurisdictions without significant tax implications. On a provisional basis, the Company does not expect to owe the one-time Transition Tax liability, based on foreign tax pools that are in excess of U.S. tax rates. We believe that our U.S. based subsidiaries, in the aggregate, will generate positive operating cash flows and in addition we may utilize our Credit Agreement for U.S. based cash needs.
Significant Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
The following table summarizes our significant contractual obligations and commercial commitments atas of December 31, 2019 that affect our liquidity:2022.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Payments due by Period |
| | Total (1) | | Less Than 1 Year | | 1 – 3 Years | | 3 – 5 Years | | More than 5 years |
| Contractual Cash Obligations: | (in thousands) |
| Long-term debt, less current portion | $ | 653,850 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 653,850 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Interest payments on debt | 154,130 |
| | 34,777 |
| | 64,055 |
| | 55,298 |
| | — |
|
| Operating leases | 21,193 |
| | 3,994 |
| | 6,332 |
| | 4,033 |
| | 6,834 |
|
| Total contractual cash obligations | $ | 829,173 |
| | $ | 38,771 |
| | $ | 70,387 |
| | $ | 713,181 |
| | $ | 6,834 |
|
| Commercial Commitments: | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. standby letters of credit | $ | 34,329 |
| | $ | 23,060 |
| | $ | 11,269 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| International standby letters of credit | 7,661 |
| | 4,176 |
| | 2,236 |
| | 944 |
| | 305 |
|
| Commercial contract commitments | 116,733 |
| | 103,795 |
| | 10,129 |
| | 2,184 |
| | 625 |
|
| Total commercial commitments | $ | 158,723 |
| | $ | 131,031 |
| | $ | 23,634 |
| | $ | 3,128 |
| | $ | 930 |
|
Total lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases as of December 31, 2022 were $7.9 million in 2023, $7.4 million in 2024, $6.3 million in 2025, $5.8 million in 2026, $5.0 million in 2027 and $19.2 million thereafter.
Debt payments due during the next five years as of December 31, 2022 are zero in 2023 through 2025, $27.4 million in 2026, zero in 2027 and $489.6 million thereafter.
Interest payments due during the next five years as of December 31, 2022 are $51.9 million in 2023, $51.9 million in 2024, $51.9 million in 2025, $51.9 million in 2026, $51.9 million in 2027, $46.6 million thereafter.
In accordance with the authoritative guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, as of December 31, 2019,2022, we had unrecognized tax benefits of $0.6$2.1 million including $0.0and $0.1 million of accrued interest. Approximately $1.5 million as of December 31, 2022 represents the amount that if recognized would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate in future periods. The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months.
Our commercial contract commitments primarily relate to open purchase orders of $107.3 million, $7.5 million of which extend to 2020 and beyond.
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, we made cash contributions of approximately $0.8 million to our U.S. plans and $4.3 million for our foreign plans. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, we did not make any cash contributions to our qualified defined benefit plan, but made $0.4 million in payments for our nonqualified plans. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, we contributed $0.8 million to our qualified defined benefit U.S. plans, $0.4 million to
our nonqualified supplemental plan, and $0.2 million for our non-U.S. plans. In addition, we made $3.4 million, $1.8 million, $2.0 million in payments to our 401(k) savings plan for 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
In 2020,2023, we expect to make defined benefit plan contributions based on the minimum required funding in accordance with statutory requirements.requirements (approximately $1.0 million in the U.S. and approximately $3.8 million for our foreign plans). The estimates for plan funding for future periods may change as a result of the uncertainties concerning the return on plan assets, the number of plan participants, and other changes in actuarial assumptions. We anticipate fulfilling these commitments through ourthe generation of cash flow from operations.
In addition to the contractual obligations and commitments described above, we also had other commercial commitments for which we are contingently liable as of December 31, 2022. Other corporate commercial commitments include standby letters of credit of $32.4 million, in the aggregate, $16.3 million of which expire in less than one year.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Through December 31, 2019,2022, we have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements or material transactions with unconsolidated entities or other persons that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to investors.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market Risk
BusinessIn both reporting segments, the Company's performance continues to be adversely impacted by global supply chain constraints, rising inflation including global energy inflation, and volatility in foreign exchange rates and interest rates. In 2021 and into 2022, we faced unexpected difficulties in procuring certain raw material, castings, and components, additional labor constraints due to COVID-19 and a challenging labor market, and inflation on both material and logistics. These challenges continued to evolve in 2022, with inflation levels reaching multi-decade highs. In order to mitigate the impact of these factors on our operations and financial position, we continue to implement actions across the company including, but not limited to: list price increases and surcharges, structural cost out actions, changes in suppliers from which we procure material, and manufacturing productivity through the implementation of the CIRCOR Operating System across the company. Additionally, we continue to monitor and evaluate additional sanctions and export restrictions that may be imposed by the U.S. Government and other governments along with any responses from Russia that could directly affect our supply chain, business partners or customers. The aggregate revenue from customers in Russia and Ukraine for each of the fiscal years ended 2022 and 2021 was less than 1% of consolidated net revenues, primarily related to our Downstream Oil & Gas business in the oil & gas refining sectorIndustrial reporting segment. Currently we have a pending project in Russia that could result in approximately $4.0 million reversal of unbilled revenue and other receivables if tighter sanctions or restrictions prevented us from delivering the project and receiving payment. Additionally, the conflict in Russia and Ukraine is largely tiedlikely to refining margins, which are also driven by the market price of crude oil and gasoline demand. Seasonal factors such as hurricanes and peak gasolineadversely impact demand in the summer months may also drive high crack spread margins. During periods when high crack spread margins exist, refineries preferthat region, increase energy costs related to operate continuously at full capacity. Refiners may decide to delay planned maintenance (commonly called “unit turnarounds”) during these periods to maximize their returns. Refining crack spread margins moderated in 2018, which resulted in unit turnarounds. As a result, the timing of major capital projects in our severe service refinery valves business were impacted. While planned maintenanceoperations, and unit turnarounds are necessary for safenegatively impact material cost and efficient operation of the refineries, project timing driven by these factors may continue to create fluctuations in our performance.availability.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations including foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. During 2019, the Company entered into a cross-currency swap ("(“cross-currency swap"swap”) agreement to hedge against future volatility in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Euro. We believe our exposureThe cross-currency swap was pursuant to changesan ISDA Master Agreement with Deutsche Bank AG and provided for early termination if the counterparty ceased to be part of the Company’s secured lender group. Concurrent with the closing of the Credit Agreement, the cross-currency swap was terminated in foreign currency is not material given our hedging policy.December 2021. For additional information regarding our foreign currency exchange risk refer to Note 13,12, Financing Arrangements, of the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Interest Rate Risk
Loans under our credit facility bear interest at variable rates which reset every 30 to 180 days depending on the rate and period selected by the Company. These loans are subject to interest rate risk as interest rates will be adjusted at each rollover date to the extent such amounts are not repaid. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the annual ratesinterest rate on the revolving loans were 6.0%Company's term loan portion was 9.884%. TheIn 2018, the Company entered into a hedging agreementan interest rate swap to mitigate the inherent rate risk associated with our outstanding variable rate debt. We believe our exposure toThis hedging instrument matured in April 2022 and the Company is currently unhedged against changes in interest rates is not material given our hedging policy.rates. Refer to Note 13,12, Financing Arrangements, of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto are listed in Item 15(a)(1) on the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") (our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information we disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive and financial officers, to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective because of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined by Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). The Company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The Company's management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based upon the framework presented in “Internal Control-Integrated Framework” (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2019,2022, due to the material weaknesses discussed below.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
WeBased on its assessment, Management concluded that deficiencies existed as of December 31, 2022, as the Company did not maintain a sufficient complementnumber of corporate personnel with appropriate levels offinance, accounting and internal controls knowledgepersonnel across the organization to identify and experience commensurate with ourprevent the misstatements that resulted in the restatement of the prior period financial reporting requirements to appropriately analyze, record and disclose accounting matters completely and accurately. statements.
This material weakness contributed to the following additional material weaknesses detailed below.
Wea. The Company did not design and maintain effectivea sufficient level of centralized oversight over smaller reporting locations. Specifically, the Company did not adequately design controls to analyze, account forvalidate the completeness and review non-routine transactions ataccuracy of amounts that were used in controls designed to mitigate the corporate level, including accounting forrisks of material misstatements within significant accounts of smaller reporting locations. Also, the financial statement effects of business dispositions, adverse purchase commitment liabilities, restricted cash balance sheet classification and other non-recurring transactions.
WeCompany did not design and maintain effective controls over the preparation, review and approval of cash account reconciliations and did not obtain direct access to bank accounts at certain account reconciliations. Specifically, wesmaller reporting locations.
b. The Company did not maintain a sufficient complement of effective process level controls overat smaller reporting locations to validate activity recorded within the completeness and reviewtrial balances of supporting schedules and accuracysmaller reporting locations based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issue by the Committee of underlying data supporting account reconciliations preparedSponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Additionally, the Company did not maintain sufficient level of monitoring of that activity at the corporate level and certain of our shared service locations.segment level.
These material weaknesses resulted in audit adjustmentsmisstatements to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in the areasacross a number of financial statement line items, including but not limited to revenues, net income, taxes,goodwill, cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash), adverse purchase commitment liabilities and other liabilities, and special chargesworking capital accounts resulting in restatement of the prior period financial statements.
As part of the Company's review of control testing during 2022, the Company determined it did not have effective IT general controls over certain IT applications supporting financial reporting. Governance of IT general controls includes a process to monitor performance of the controls within the IT control environment throughout the year. The material weakness was primarily related to non-recurring transactionsan ineffective governance of IT general controls by the Company. Process-level automated controls and manual controls that were dependent upon the information derived from IT systems were also determined to be ineffective as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019. Additionally, these material weaknesses coulda result in misstatements of the annual or interim consolidated financial statements that would result in a material misstatement that would not be prevented or detected.IT general control deficiencies.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included herein.
Remediation Plan for Material WeaknessWeaknesses in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We haveThe Company has been actively addressing the identified material weaknesses. Actions have been taken to strengthen controls, and further actions are planned including:
Hire additional full-time corporate accounting resources with appropriate levels of experience
Continue to allocate additional resources to the Corporate accounting function, which may include the use of independent consultants with sufficient expertise to assista. The Company is in the preparationprocess of reassessing its staffing needs and adding personnel in key roles or external resources as necessary, to address the identified control gaps
b. Redesign monitoring controls to provide more direct and centralized oversight over smaller reporting locations
c. Implement additional controls targeted to prevent and detect a material misstatement arising at smaller reporting locations including an additional control designed to have Corporate independently review of certain non-recurring transactionscash account reconciliations and timely reviewobtain direct access to bank accounts of the account reconciliationsCompany’s smaller reporting locations
d. Continue training on a regular basis related to internal control over financial reporting for our finance, accounting and accountingIT personnel
We anticipatef. Implementing additional monitoring controls by management over the execution and timeliness of the Company's IT general controls
The Company expects that the actions described above and resulting improvements in controls will strengthen the Company’sits internal control over financial reporting and will address the relatedidentified material weaknesses.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2019 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Item 9C. Disclosure Regarding Foreign Jurisdiction that Prevents Inspections
Not applicable.
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Board of Directors
The following table provides information required under this item is incorporated by referenceabout the board of directors and the detailed information about each individual’s qualifications, experience, skills and expertise along with select professional and community contributions can be found below.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Position | Age | Director Since | Audit | Compensation | N&CG* | Independent |
| Samuel R. Chapin | Director | 65 | 2019 | t | | l | X |
| Tina M. Donikowski | Director | 63 | 2017 | l | l | t | X |
| Bruce Lisman | Director | 76 | 2020 | l | l | | X |
Helmuth Ludwig t | Chair | 60 | 2016 | | | | X |
Tony Najjar** | Director | 61 | 2023 | | | | |
| John (Andy) O'Donnell | Director | 74 | 2011 | | t | l | X |
| Jill D. Smith | Director | 64 | 2020 | l | | l | X |
t Chair l Member
*N&CG: Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
**On March 13, 2023, the Board elected Tony Najjar to a vacant seat, effective March 20, 2023.
Under our amended Articles of Incorporation and By-laws, our board has completed its transition from a classified board to the Company’s definitive proxy statement pursuantannual election of all directors. At each annual meeting of stockholders, all directors will stand for election for one-year terms expiring at the next succeeding annual meeting of stockholders.
Samuel R. Chapin. Mr. Chapin has served as a member of the Board since January 2019. Mr. Chapin served as Executive Vice Chairman at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch, a multinational investment bank, from 2010 to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filedhis retirement in June 2016. Mr. Chapin joined Merrill Lynch in 1984 as a member of the Mergers and Acquisitions group and he was named a Managing Director in Investment Banking in 1993. Mr. Chapin was named Senior Vice President and head of Merrill Lynch’s Global Investment Banking Division in 2001 and was named Vice Chairman in 2003. While at Merrill Lynch and Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Mr. Chapin was responsible for managing relationships with a number of the firm’s largest corporate clients. He currently serves on the Board of Directors of PerkinElmer, Inc., and O-I Glass, Inc. and the Board of Trustees at Lafayette College. Mr. Chapin’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his experience and significant knowledge of the industrials market with a mastery of strategic M&A accrued over more than 35 years in investment banking.
Tina M. Donikowski. Ms. Donikowski has served as a member of the Board since March 2017. Ms. Donikowski retired from General Electric Company, a diversified industrial company, in October 2015 after 38 years with the company. She served in a number of senior positions during her career at General Electric Company, including most recently as Vice President, Global Locomotive Business, GE Transportation, from January 2013 until her retirement. She currently also serves on the Board of Directors of TopBuild Corp., a leading installer and distributor of insulation and building material products to the U.S. construction industry based in Daytona Beach, Florida; Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of highly engineered precision power, measurement, and control solutions for mission-critical applications and processes; and Eriez Magnetics, a privately held manufacturer and designer of magnetic, vibratory, and metal detection applications based in Erie, Pennsylvania. Previously she served on the board of Atlas Copco AB, a world-leading provider of sustainable productivity solutions based in Stockholm, Sweden. Ms. Donikowski’s qualifications to sit on our Board include her extensive experience in leading technology businesses and her strong operations background.
Bruce Lisman. Mr. Lisman has served as a member of the Board since June 2020. Mr. Lisman retired in 2009 from JP Morgan Chase & Co., a multinational investment firm, where he had served as Chairman of the Global Equities Division. From 1987 to 2008, he was Head or Co-Head of the Global Equity Division at Bear Stearns Companies. Mr. Lisman serves as a director of Myers Industries, Inc., where he is a member of the audit and nominating and governance committees, Associated Capital, where he is a member of the audit committee and chair of the governance committee, and National Life Group, where he serves on the compensation committee, executive committee, and nominating and governance committee. Prior board service includes PC Construction, an engineering and construction company as Chairman from 2013 to 2019, and as a member until 2021, and The Pep Boys, a nationwide auto parts retailer. Mr. Lisman’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his financial, global business and leadership expertise.
Helmuth Ludwig. Dr. Ludwig has served as a member of the Board since January 2016. From October 2016 until his retirement in December 2019, he served as Global CIO for Siemens, a leading technology company. He previously served among other roles as CEO of the Siemens Industry Sector in North America from October 2011 to September 2014 and as President of Siemens PLM Software from August 2007 to September 2010 where he is credited for having successfully led the integration of the organization’s 50 legal entities and multiple facilities across 26 countries. Earlier in his career, Dr. Ludwig held a number of international assignments at Siemens in Europe, Latin America, and Asia. Dr. Ludwig has served as a member of the board of Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo since July 2020. He teaches as a Professor of Practice for Strategy and Entrepreneurship at Southern Methodist University Cox School of Business in Dallas and is a Board Leadership Fellow and a Certified Director with the National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD). Dr. Ludwig is a known expert and regular speaker at industry conferences on the Internet of Things and “Industry 4.0.” Dr. Ludwig’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his proven manufacturing leadership skills, extensive international experience, and his success in leading the integration and simplification of a complex global enterprise.
Tony Najjar. Mr. Najjar was named Chief Operating Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 19, 2022, and President and Chief Executive Officer effective August 10, 2022. He previously served as the President, Aerospace and Defense Group beginning in February 2018. He served as Vice President, Aerospace and Defense in the Advance Flow Solutions Group from October 2016 to February 2018 and Vice President, Sales & Marketing, Aerospace and Defense Group, from April 2015 to October 2016. Before joining CIRCOR, Mr. Najjar served as Programs Manager, Business Development and Mergers & Acquisitions at Rockwell Collins, a multinational manufacturing company, from October 2011 to April 2015. He has spent nearly 36 years in the aerospace and defense industry in engineering, sales, and general management roles, including leadership positions at Rockwell Collins and Kaiser Aerospace. Mr. Najjar's qualifications to sit on our Board include his extensive business and manufacturing leadership and improving the operational performance and profitably of large multinational manufacturing businesses.
John (Andy) O'Donnell. Mr. O'Donnell has served as a member of the Board since November 2011. Until his retirement in January 2014, Mr. O'Donnell had worked at Baker Hughes, an oilfield services company, since 1975. He served as Vice President of Baker Hughes since 1998 and was appointed to Vice President, Office of the Chief Executive Officer in 2012, a role in which he served until his retirement. From 2009 to 2011, Mr. O'Donnell was President, Western Hemisphere Operations of Baker Hughes. He was President of Baker Petrolite Corporation from 2005 to 2009 and President of Baker Hughes Drilling Fluids from 2004 to 2005. He served as Vice President, Business Process Development at Baker Hughes from 1998 to 2002 and as Vice President of Manufacturing at Baker Oil Tools from 1990 to 1998. Mr. O'Donnell also serves on the Board of Directors of Cactus, Inc., where he is a member of its Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. Mr. O'Donnell’s qualifications to sit on our Board include his experience in international energy markets and leading multinational sales, marketing, service and manufacturing operations.
Jill D. Smith. Ms. Smith has served as a member of the Board since January 2020. Ms. Smith most recently served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Allied Minds plc, an intellectual property commercialization company focused on technology and life sciences from March 2017 until her retirement in June 2019. She previously served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of DigitalGlobe, Inc., a global provider of satellite imagery products and services, from 2005 to 2011. Ms. Smith started her career as a consultant at Bain & Company where she rose to Partner. She then joined Sara Lee as Vice President and subsequently went on to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer of SRDS, a business-to-business publishing firm and later as President and Chief Executive Officer of eDial, a VoIP collaboration company. Furthermore, she served as Chief Operating Officer of Micron Electronics, and co-founded and led Treacy & Company, a consulting and boutique investment firm. Ms. Smith currently serves on the Boards of Directors of R1 RCM Inc., where she is a member of the Audit and Human Capital Committees, AspenTech, where she is Chair of the Board and Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and MDA, where she is Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee. Ms. Smith’s qualifications to sit on our Board includes her extensive experience as a technology executive, including as a CEO focused on growing innovative companies.
Management
Our current executive officers and key employees, and their respective ages and positions, are as follows: | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Age | Position |
| Tony Najjar | 61 | President and Chief Executive Officer |
| Arjun Sharma | 45 | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Business Development |
| Jessica Wenzell | 48 | Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary and Chief People Officer |
| Joseph Losak II | 58 | Vice President, Finance, Corporate Controller |
| Forrest Tiedeman | 65 | Vice President, Corporate Treasurer |
Tony Najjar. Mr. Najjar was named Chief Operating Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 19, 2022, and President and Chief Executive Officer effective August 10, 2022. He previously served as the President, Aerospace and Defense Group beginning in February 2018. He served as Vice President, Aerospace and Defense in the Advance Flow Solutions Group from October 2016 to February 2018 and Vice President, Sales & Marketing, Aerospace and Defense Group, from April 2015 to October 2016. Before joining CIRCOR, Mr. Najjar served as Programs Manager, Business Development and Mergers & Acquisitions at Rockwell Collins, a multinational manufacturing company, from October 2011 to April 2015. He has spent nearly 36 years in the aerospace and defense industry in engineering, sales, and general management roles, including leadership positions at Rockwell Collins and Kaiser Aerospace. Mr. Najjar holds both a bachelor's degree and a Master of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from Oklahoma State University and an MBA from Pepperdine University.
Arjun Sharma. Mr. Sharma was appointed as our Interim Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 2022, and Chief Financial Office effective August 10, 2022. He continues to serve as our Senior Vice President, Business Development, a position he has held since 2009, overseeing the Company’s mergers and acquisitions and strategic planning functions. Prior to joining CIRCOR, Mr. Sharma served as managing director at Global Equity Partners, a venture capital and strategy consulting firm, from January 2009 to September 2009, where he was responsible for executing equity investments and leading client engagements on acquisitions, divestitures, and growth strategy. From 2007 to 2008, he was Director of Mergers and Acquisitions at Textron Inc., a multi-industry company with a global network of aircraft, defense, industrial and finance businesses, where he was responsible for developing the company’s M&A strategy and leading acquisition and divestiture transactions. From 2002 to 2007, Mr. Sharma held various positions of increasing responsibility at SPX Corporation, a Fortune 500 multi-industry company, culminating in his appointment as Director of Corporate Development. Mr. Sharma holds a Master of Science degree in Finance from Drexel University and a Bachelor of Commerce degree from Delhi University. Mr. Sharma is a graduate of the PLD program at Harvard Business School.
Jessica Wenzell. Ms. Wenzell was appointed as Chief People Officer effective November 15, 2021 and continues to serve as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, roles she has held since joining CIRCOR in September 2020. Prior to joining CIRCOR, Ms. Wenzell served in executive roles of increasing responsibility at General Electric Company for over 14 years. From January 2018 to August 2020, she was GE’s Executive Counsel – Strategic Transactions, leading cross-functional, legal entity carve-out activities for divestitures. Her previous roles at GE included Executive Counsel – Indirect Sourcing & Properties (August 2017 to March 2018); Executive Counsel, Chief Compliance Officer for GE Oil & Gas (August 2013 to July 2017); and General Counsel for GE Measurement & Control (2010 to 2013). Ms. Wenzell began her career at Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP in the Corporate & Securities Practice Group. She received her Bachelor’s degree in Political Science from the University of California, San Diego and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days afterher J.D. from the closeUniversity of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco.
Joseph Losak II. Mr. Losak joined CIRCOR as Vice President, Deputy Controller in August 2022 and appointed Vice President, Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer in January 2023. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Losak worked at Hill International, Inc., a construction management company, where he served as Director of Accounting & Financial Reporting from 2018 to 2022 responsible for overseeing Hill International, Inc.'s accounting and financial reporting functions. He began his career in public accounting and has held various internal audit and corporate finance positions. He is a Certified Public Accountant and received his Bachelor of Arts in Economics from University of Michigan and Master of Business Administration from Pace University in New York.
Forrest Tiedeman. Mr. Tiedeman has served as Vice President and Corporate Treasurer since September 2022. He joined CIRCOR in April 2021 as the Vice President of Tax. He currently leads the Tax and Treasury functions at CIRCOR. Before joining CIRCOR, from November 2013 to November 2020 he served as the Senior Director International Tax at Nuance Communications Inc. and from September 2003 to November 2013 as the Director of Tax at Alere Inc. He is registered in Massachusetts as a Certified Public Accountant and as a licensed lawyer. He is a graduate of Suffolk University Law School and the University of Michigan.
CERTAIN CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS
Board Committees
Our Board maintains three standing committees: an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee and a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee, which consists of Mr. Chapin, Ms. Donikowski, Mr. Lisman, and Ms. Smith (each of whom has been affirmatively determined by the full Board to be an independent director, as well as meeting the stricter independence standards applicable to audit committee members under NYSE listing standards and the rules of the SEC), oversees the integrity of the Company’s fiscalfinancial statements and is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work of the firm of independent auditors (the “Auditors”) that audits the Company’s financial statements and performs services related to the audit. Among other responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviews the scope and results of the audit with the Auditors, reviews with management and the Auditors the Company’s annual and quarterly operating results, considers the adequacy of the Company’s internal accounting procedures and controls and considers the effect of such procedures on the Auditors’ independence. The Audit Committee also is responsible for overseeing the Company’s internal audit function, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and cybersecurity issues, and the review and approval of related party transactions. To satisfy these oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee separately meets regularly with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Vice President of Internal Audit, and the Auditors. Pursuant to the requirements of the NYSE, the Audit Committee operates in accordance with a charter (the “Audit Committee Charter”), which is available on the Company’s website at www.CIRCOR.com under the “Investors” sub-link. The Company will provide a hard copy of the Audit Committee Charter to stockholders free of charge upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate headquarters. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the financial literacy requirements of the NYSE and, in addition, the Board has determined that at least one of the Committee’s members, Mr. Chapin, is an “audit committee financial expert” under the disclosure standards adopted by the SEC.
Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee, which consists of Mr. O’Donnell, Ms. Donikowski, and Mr. Lisman (each of whom has been affirmatively determined by the full Board to be an independent director, as well as meeting the stricter independence standards applicable to compensation committee members under NYSE listing standards and the rules of the SEC), sets and oversees the Company’s compensation philosophy and policy, reviews and determines the compensation arrangements for the Company’s CEO; reviews the recommendations of the CEO and approves the compensation arrangements for all other officers and senior level employees; reviews general compensation levels for other employees as a group; determines the awards to be granted to eligible persons under the Company's 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (as amended, the “2019 Pan:”); and takes such other action as may be required in connection with the Company’s compensation and incentive plans, including with respect to compensation and risk-management issues. The Compensation Committee has the sole authority from the Board for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the Company’s outside compensation consultant.
The Compensation Committee engaged Semler Brossy (“Semler”) in the last quarter of the year ended December 31, 20192021 as its compensation consultant. In so doing, the Compensation Committee affirmatively determined that Semler is independent and has no conflict of interest as contemplated under rules adopted by the SEC and the NYSE, and has conducted annual reviews to confirm that Semler remains free of conflict per these rules. Semler reports directly to the Compensation Committee and does not provide any additional services to the Company. The executive compensation services provided by Semler include assisting in defining the Company’s executive compensation strategy, providing market benchmark information, recommending the composition of the compensation peer group used as a benchmark by the Compensation Committee, advising with respect to the design of both short-term and long-term incentive compensation plans, and summarizing regulatory and governance guidelines. In making its compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee relies significantly on the information provided by Semler.
.
The Compensation Committee operates in accordance with a charter (the “Compensation Committee Charter”), which is available on the Company’s website at www.CIRCOR.com under the “Investors” sub-link. The Company also will provide a hard copy of the Compensation Committee Charter to stockholders free of charge upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate headquarters.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, which consists of Ms. Donikowski, Mr. Chapin, Mr. O'Donnell, and Ms. Smith (each of whom has been affirmatively determined by the full Board to be an independent director), is responsible for establishing criteria for selection of new directors, identifying individuals qualified to become directors and recommending candidates to the Board for nomination as directors. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board a set of corporate governance principles applicable to the Company, overseeing the evaluation process of the Board and the evaluation of its committees, recommending to the Board appropriate levels of director compensation and, together with the Audit Committee, monitoring compliance with the Company’s Code of Conduct & Business Ethics. The committee also oversees ESG, including human capital, employee safety and diversity & inclusion initiatives. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee operates in accordance with a charter (the “Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter”), which is available on the Company’s website at www.CIRCOR.com under the “Investors” sub-link. The Company also will provide a hard copy of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Charter to stockholders free of charge upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at the Company’s corporate headquarters.
Ad Hoc Committees. From time to time, the Board may establish ad hoc committees and delegate certain of its authority for the purpose of addressing particular matters (including, for example, the approval of financing or credit agreements or other matters that the Board thinks would be appropriate for review by an ad hoc committee). The Board established a special sub-committee on February 4, 2022, to assist with its strategic alternatives review. Mr. Ludwig, Mr. Chapin, and Mr. Lisman serve on the committee.
Executive Session. Independent directors meet at least twice a year in executive session without management, and at such other times as may be requested by any independent director. During Fiscal Year 2022, the Chair of the Board presided at meetings of the Company’s independent directors held in executive session without management. These sessions promote candor and discussion of matters in a setting that is independent of management.
Code of Ethics
The Company has implemented and regularly monitors compliance withIn November 2022 the Company's Board approved a comprehensivenew Code of Conduct & Business Ethics (the "Code“Code of Conduct"Conduct”),. The Company regularly monitors compliance with the Code of Conduct, which applies uniformly to all directors, executive officers, employees, contractors, and employees.vendors. Among other things, the Code of Conduct addresses conflicts of interest, confidentially,confidentiality, fair dealing, protection and proper use of Company assets, compliance with applicable law (including insider trading and anti-bribery laws), and reporting of illegal or unethical behavior. The Code of Conduct is available on the Company's website at www.CIRCOR.com under the "Investors" sub link“Investors” tab and hardcopya hard copy will be provided by the Company to any stockholder who requests it by writing to the Company's Secretary at the Company's headquarters.executive offices. In addition, we intend towill post on our website all disclosures that are required by SEC regulations or NYSE listing standards with respect to amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Code of Conduct.
Delinquent Section16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and the holders of more than 10% of our common stock to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and other equity securities. To our knowledge, based solely on a review of our records and written representations by the persons required to file these reports, all filing requirements of Section 16(a) were satisfied on a timely basis with respect to Fiscal Year 2022.
Family Relationships
No family relationships exist between any director or executive officer.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The members of the Compensation Committee in Fiscal Year 2022 were Mr. O'Donnell, Ms. Donikowski, and Mr. Lisman. None of the Company’s executive officers serves as a member of the Board or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of the Company’s Compensation Committee. In addition, none of the Company’s executive officers serves as a member of the compensation committee of any entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of the Board.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Director Compensation
The form and amount of director compensation are reviewed periodically by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, most recently in February 2023. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee reviews peer compensation practices of our Peer Group Companies, which are outlined in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this document, as presented by the board's independent compensation consultant, Semler Brossy Consulting Group, and broad survey data concerning director compensation practices, levels, and trends for companies comparable to the Company in revenue, business, and complexity. It also considers the significant amount of time that our non-employee directors spend in fulfilling their duties to the Company as well as the required level of skill to serve on our Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends changes, if any, to the Board for approval. Employee directors do not receive separate compensation for service as directors.
The Company uses a combination of cash and stock-based incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve as non-employee directors on the Board. Cash compensation is paid quarterly, in arrears. The cash compensation our non-employee directors earned in 2022 is as follows:
Annual Cash Compensation | | | | | |
Annual Retainer (Chair of the Board)................................................................................................. | $ | 190,000 | |
Annual Retainer (Board Member)...................................................................................................... | $ | 75,000 | |
Chair Fee (Audit Committee)............................................................................................................ | $ | 20,000 | |
Chair Fee (Compensation Committee)................................................................................................ | $ | 15,000 | |
Chair Fee (Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee)............................................................... | $ | 10,000 | |
Committee Membership Fee (per committee)....................................................................................... | $ | 5,000 | |
Annual Equity Grant
Our non-employee directors are also eligible to receive an annual equity grant under our 2019 Plan. If a director joins the Board during the middle of the year, the annual equity grant is pro-rated based on the quarter in which the director joins the Board. In 2022, the targeted value of such grant was $105,000. On August 15, 2022, each directorreceived a grant of 5,840 time-based restricted stock units (“Time RSUs”) which becomes vested and settles in shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis one-year from the date of grant, provided the non-employee director is still providing services on the Board. The number of Time RSUs was determined by dividing $105,000 by $17.98, which reflects the average closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange for the last 11 trading days ending on August 12, 2022, rounded up to the nearest whole share.
2022 Director Compensation
The following table shows the compensation our non-employee directors earned for their services in 2022:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Fees Earned in Cash (1) | Stock Awards (2) | Total |
| Samuel Chapin | $100,000 | $115,282 | $215,282 |
| Tina M. Donikowski | $95,000 | $115,282 | $210,282 |
| Arthur L. George, Jr. | $36,173 | $26,839 | $63,012 |
| Bruce Lisman | $85,000 | $115,282 | $200,282 |
| Helmuth Ludwig | $190,000 | $115,282 | $305,282 |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| John (Andy) O'Donnell | $95,000 | $115,282 | $210,282 |
| Jill D. Smith | $85,000 | $115,282 | $200,282 |
| | | | | |
| (1) | The amounts shown in this column reflect the fees earned in Fiscal Year 2022 for Board and committee service. Mr. George resigned from the Board effective July 22, 2022. |
| (2) | Reflects the grant date fair value of the annual equity grant made in Time RSUs to each of the directors in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. For a discussion of the assumptions related to the calculation of the amounts in this column, refer to Note 13 Share-Based Compensation, of the consolidated financial statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The grant date fair value of the Time RSUs was based on the Company's previous day closing stock price prior to the grant date. For Mr. George, this value is based on a stock price of $26.60 in connection with his pro-rated new hire grant on January 26, 2022; for the other directors, this value is based on a stock price of $19.74 in connection with the annual award granted on August 15, 2022. Mr. George did not participate in the August award due to his resignation on July 22, 2022. |
The total number of Time RSUs held by each non-employee director as of December 31, 2022 was 5,840, excluding Mr. George whose 1,009 outstanding RSUs vested and converted to common stock on July 25, 2022 following his resignation.
Deferred Compensation
The Company did not sponsor a compensation deferral program for non-employee directors in 2022. As of December 31, 2022, there were no outstanding deferred compensation balances for non-employee directors.
Reimbursement for Training and Reasonable Related Travel
Each of our directors has a budget of up to $5,000 USD (plus travel costs) per year for relevant educational training. When possible, directors are encouraged to share training opportunities with other boards that they serve on and to split the costs for such opportunities between those boards and the Company. Each of our non-employee directors are also reimbursed for reasonable travel and other expenses incurred in attending meetings.
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis explains the key elements of our executive compensation program and compensation decisions as they relate to the named executive officers ("NEOs") of the Company for Fiscal Year 2022. As a result of various role restructurings over the course of 2022, including the elimination of our Group President roles, the consolidation of our Chief People Officer and General Counsel roles and the consolidation of our Chief Financial Officer and Head of Business Development roles, as of December 31, 2022 we had four active executive officers. These four officers, along with our former President and Chief Executive Officer and former Chief Accounting Officer, comprise our list of NEOs for Fiscal Year 2022, listed below.
| | | | | |
| Named Executive Officer | Title |
Tony Najjar(1) | President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) |
Arjun Sharma(2) | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Business Development |
| Jessica Wenzell | Senior Vice President, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary & Chief People Officer |
Forrest Tiedeman(3) | Vice President, Treasury and Tax |
Scott Buckhout(4) | Former President and Chief Executive Officer |
Amit Goel(5) | Former Vice President, Finance, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Mr. Najjar was named President and Chief Executive Officer effective August 10, 2022; previously, he served as Chief Operating Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer with effect from January 19, 2022 and served in the role of President, Aerospace and Defense Group prior to January 19, 2022. |
| (2) | Mr. Sharma was named Chief Financial Officer effective August 10, 2022; previously, he served as our Interim Chief Financial Officer with effect from January 1, 2022 and continues to serve as our Senior Vice President, Business Development. |
| (3) | Mr. Tiedeman was appointed as our Treasurer effective October 1, 2022 and continues to serve as our Vice President of Tax. |
| (4) | Mr. Buckhout terminated employment with CIRCOR on January 19, 2022. |
| (5) | Mr. Goel terminated employment with CIRCOR on September 9, 2022. |
Executive Summary
Our Business: 2022 Performance Overview
CIRCOR is one of the world's leading providers of mission critical flow control products and services for the Industrial and Aerospace & Defense markets. The Company has a product portfolio of market-leading brands serving its customers' most demanding applications. CIRCOR markets its solutions directly and through various sales partners to more than 14,000 customers in approximately 100 countries. The Company has a global presence with approximately 3,060 employees and is headquartered in Burlington, Massachusetts.
We organize our reporting structure into two segments: Aerospace & Defense ("Aerospace & Defense Group") and Industrial ("Industrial Group"). Both the current and prior periods are reported under these two segments.
We believe that the Company’s continued focus on growth, margin expansion and deleveraging the balance sheet creates value for shareholders. In the Industrial segment, we continue to focus on leveraging our aftermarket position, value-based pricing, growth and margin expansion. In our Aerospace & Defense segment, we continue to benefit from the rebound of commercial aerospace, new products in defense and hydrogen, and sustaining momentum in our core defense businesses.
Additionally, attracting and retaining talented personnel remains an essential underpinning to the enhancement of our global sales, operations, product management and engineering organizations.
2022 Financial Achievements
The following table highlights certain measures that serve as our compensation performance metrics for our performance-based compensation and the level of achievement of these metrics in 2022 (prior to adjustments as discussed below under Key Compensation Actions Taken During 2022):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (expressed in millions except percentages) |
| Short-Term Incentive Plan Metrics | Long-Term Incentive Plan Metrics |
| Net Sales | Adjusted Operating Income(1) | Adjusted Working Capital % of Sales(2) | Free Cash Flow(3) | Adjusted Operating Margin(4) | Adjusted Measurement Cash Flow(5) | Relative Total Shareholder Return(6) |
CIRCOR (overall including Corporate expenses)(7) | N/A | $95.7 | N/A | $(22.7) | 11.1% | $7.4 | see note (6) |
Chief Operating Officer Functional Leadership Score(8) | $822.7 | $119.2 | 31.5% | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Adjusted Operating Income (“AOI”), a non-GAAP measure, is defined as GAAP operating income excluding intangible amortization and amortization of fair value step-ups of inventory and fixed assets from acquisitions completed after December 31, 2011, the impact of restructuring-related inventory write-offs, impairment charges and special charges or gains. |
| (2) | "Adjusted Working Capital % of Sales" or "(AWC % of Sales": a non-GAAP measure, is defined as the sum of Adjusted Working Capital balances at year-end divided by Net Sales. “Adjusted Working Capital” includes the following accounts: Trade Accounts Receivable, Unbilled Receivables (short and long term), Inventory, Trade Accounts Payable, Customer Advances (short and long term), and Deferred Revenue. |
| (3) | Free Cash Flow, a non-GAAP financial measure calculated by subtracting GAAP capital expenditures, net of proceeds from asset sales, from GAAP operating cash flow. For the purposes of Short-Term Incentive calculations, the CIRCOR Free Cash Flow results will be adjusted for any restructuring or special charges cash expense that was not contemplated in the Fiscal Year budget. |
| (4) | Adjusted Operating Margin (“AOM”), a non-GAAP measure, is defined as Adjusted Operating Income divided by Net Sales. Adjusted Operating Income is defined as GAAP operating income excluding intangible amortization and amortization of fair value step-ups of inventory and fixed assets from acquisitions completed after December 31, 2011, the impact of restructuring-related inventory write-offs, impairment charges and special charges or gains. |
| (5) | “Adjusted Measurement Cash Flow” or “Adjusted MCF” with respect to a fiscal year is calculated by adding the Company’s cash provided by operating businesses less Corporate General and Administrative spend for that year. Specifically, Adjusted MCF excludes cash flows from income taxes, corporate special charges, and restructuring costs but includes interest expense. |
| (6) | “Relative Total Shareholder Return” or “Relative TSR” is calculated by ranking the Company and a list of specified peer companies within the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index from highest to lowest according to their respective TSR and expressing the Company's performance as its corresponding percentile within the group of companies. Results are not yet reportable as the applicable three-year performance periods end in 2024 and 2025. |
| (7) | Corporate refers to the group of employees that provides services to the Aerospace & Defense and Industrial segments or support management of Company-wide functions. |
| (8) | Chief Operating Officer Functional Leadership Score is determined based on composite results for our A&D and Industrial segments. |
Key Compensation Actions Taken During 2022
The Company’s financial results and the overall business environment were considered when determining compensation paid for 2022. Please see Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for Fiscal Year 2022 for a more detailed description of the Company’s financial results.
Notable compensation actions taken by the Compensation Committee in 2022 included the following:
•New Short-Term Incentive Plan Component: To reflect the organizational changes following Mr. Buckhout's termination, the Compensation Committee created a new component within the Short-Term Incentive Plan (the "STI" plan) to measure the performance of the newly created office of the Chief Operating Officer. Performance for executives associated with this office, which included Mr. Najjar prior to his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, is measured based on composite results for our A&D and Industrial segments as measured by AOI, AWC% of Sales, Net Sales results and also CIRCOR AOI results. This component also impacts STI results for Corporate executives, including our NEOs.
•Retention Incentives for Certain NEOs: Given the criticality of successfully managing and completing the accounting restatement process related to our Pipeline Engineering business unit, the continued significant uncertainty arising out of our Board’s review of potential strategic alternatives and the leadership changes to our CEO and CFO positions, in 2022 the Compensation Committee determined it was necessary to provide certain of our NEOs retention awards to ensure their continued commitment and dedication to the Company during this period.
•Annual Short-Term Incentives: The Compensation Committee exercised its discretion to modify the performance targets for determining payouts under the 2022 Short-Term Incentive Plan (“2022 STI Plan”). At the beginning of 2022, when the Compensation Committee set the performance targets for the 2022 STI Plan, the Company had not yet determined the impact of the significant accounting irregularities discovered with respect to its former Pipeline Engineering business unit. As announced in the Form 8-K filed on March 14, 2022, the Pipeline Engineering accounting irregularities occurred over multiple years under the leadership of Mr. Buckhout and other former executives in our Industrial segment. For this reason, the Compensation Committee determined that it was in the best interest of the Company to exclude the Pipeline Engineering business unit for purposes of determining awards under the 2022 STI Plan. Additionally, the Compensation Committee excluded the impact of sale-lease-back transactions in determining 2022 STI Plan results since such transactions, while a net positive for our cash flow and other long-term strategic initiatives, had a negative accounting impact on our AOI STI performance results. These modifications impacted the STI awards for all plan participants, including our NEOs. The 2022 STI Plan results for our NEOs are set forth below under 2022 Short-Term Incentive Plan Results.
•Outstanding Long-Term Incentives: While a certain portion of our stock-based long-term incentive awards ("LTI") were significantly impacted by the recent restatement of our financial results, the Compensation Committee did not modify any of the performance targets or results when determining the number of shares earned under our performance-based restricted stock unit awards (“PSUs”), and as a result the third and final tranche of our 2020 PSUs earned 0% of target shares as set forth below under Prior Year PSU Results. The vesting of our 2021 and 2022 PSU awards will be determined following the completion of the three-year performance periods ending in 2024 and 2025, respectively.
•Compensation Terms for Interim and New Appointments: We experienced several management transitions during 2022. As a result, the Compensation Committee took actions to put into place compensation packages for interim and new appointments, including Mr. Najjar's appointment to Interim President and Chief Executive Officer in January 2022 and subsequent appointment in August to President and Chief Executive Officer, and similarly, for Mr. Sharma with respect to his appointment to Interim Chief Financial Officer in January and subsequent appointment to Chief Financial Officer in August.
•Compensation Clawback: In connection with our restatement of previously filed financial results, the Compensation Committee conducted a review of incentive compensation that was subject to clawback pursuant to our policies. As a result of this review, the Compensation Committee determined that it was in the best interest of the Company to not pay any 2021 STI award to Mr. Buckhout or to our former President, Industrial Group. The Committee also decided to not payout any portion of the last vesting tranche of the 2019 PSU award to any participants, including Messrs. Najjar, Sharma and Buckhout, since prior payouts for earlier vesting tranches of that award would have been reduced had they been determined based on restated award results.
CEO Pay At-A-Glance (Target v. Realized)
The chart below shows target and realized compensation for our CEO for each of the past three years. The years 2020 and 2021 reflect Mr. Buckhout's target and actual realized compensation, and 2022 reflects Mr. Najjar's target and actual realized compensation. In each case, target total direct compensation represents the base salary, target annual bonus, and target annual LTI awards in effect for our CEO as of the end of each such year. Realized compensation represents year-end base salary, annual bonus actually paid in cash (including retention bonus payments, if applicable), the value realized upon the exercise of stock options or vesting of PSUs or RSUs, including RSUs granted under our Management Stock Purchase Plan during each year, plus any special payments. Mr. Buckhout's realized compensation trailed target total direct compensation for each of 2020 and 2021, reflecting the rigor of our goal-setting process for annual bonus and PSU awards and the pay for performance nature of our overall executive compensation program. With regard to 2022, as a result of being newly appointed to the CEO role, Mr. Najjar's target compensation was set at a lower level than Mr. Buckhout's most recent target compensation, and Mr. Najjar's realized compensation reflects the pro-ration of his 2022 STI award between his former position as COO/Interim CEO and his new position as CEO and also reflects the realized value of RSU vestings attributable to prior year equity grants that preceded his promotion to CEO.
Good Compensation Governance
The Compensation Committee continually evaluates the Company's compensation policies and practices to ensure that they are consistent with good governance principles. Highlights of our executive compensation program include:
•Short-term incentive plans aligned to critical metrics. The short-term incentive plan is designed to ensure appropriate focus on the respective business units as well as overall corporate performance. Specifically, Corporate NEO bonuses are based 60% on the composite performance results of the A&D and Industrial segments with respect to AOI, AWC % of Sales and net sales goals, and 20% based on CIRCOR AOI and 20% based on CIRCOR Free Cash Flow.
•Equity vehicle mix for NEOs aligned with long-term objectives. Our 2022 annual LTI awards for NEOs that sit on our executive leadership team (comprised of Mr. Najjar, Mr. Sharma and Ms. Wenzell) were a mix of 50% PSUs based on a three-year performance period and 50% time-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”) that vest upon meeting specified multi-year service requirements, providing both long-term performance and retention incentives in support of our business strategy. Our other NEOs that participated in the 2022 LTI award (Messrs. Tiedeman and Goel) received awards using 100% RSUs to maximize long-term retention incentives. The 2022 LTI awards are described in detail below under Long-Term Incentive Awards.
•TSR performance metric for long-term awards. The Relative TSR metric that we use for our PSU awards closely aligns the long-term interests of our executive management team with those of our stockholders by formulaically linking award results with shareholder returns as measured over a three-year period.
The table below summarizes our compensation governance practices:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| What We Do | What We Do Not Do |
| ü | We place the majority of weight on performance-based, at-risk, and long-term compensation. | X | We do not provide any compensation-related tax gross-ups (except in connection with relocation expenses). |
| ü | We deliver rewards that are based on achieving long-term objectives and the creation of stockholder value. | X | We do not provide significant perquisites. |
| ü | We target total direct compensation at approximately the market median for our peer group. | X | We do not allow officers or directors to hedge Company stock. |
| ü | We maintain stock ownership guidelines for our directors and executives, including our CEO and other NEOs. | X | We do not reprice or replace out-of-the-money stock options without stockholder approval. |
| ü | We have “double-trigger” change in control vesting of cash severance payments and equity awards. | X | We do not have contracts that guarantee employment with any executive (all employment is terminable-at-will). |
| ü | Our Compensation Committee seeks advice from an independent compensation consultant. | | |
| ü | We maintain a clawback policy with respect to incentive-based cash and equity compensation. | | |
| ü | We cap annual bonus payouts to eliminate potential windfalls for executives. | | |
| ü | We cap the vesting value of TSR-based PSUs to eliminate potential windfalls for executives. | | |
| ü | We encourage executives to invest their cash incentives in the Company through our Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP). | | |
What Guides Our Program
Our Compensation Guiding Principles
The philosophy underlying our executive compensation program is to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified and talented executives and reward the achievement of specific annual, long-term and strategic goals that promote the profitable growth of the Company and enhance stockholder value. To this end, the following principles guide the structure of our program:
•Link to business priorities and performance. A significant portion of an executive’s total compensation should be “at risk,” subject to the attainment of certain specific and measurable performance goals and objectives. We select performance metrics that are most directly tied to the creation of enterprise value and that our management team can meaningfully influence. As performance goals are met or exceeded, executives are rewarded commensurately. Conversely, if goals are not met, actual earned compensation will be lower than target compensation.
•Alignment of executives with stockholders' interests. Our compensation program should encourage our executives to hold a meaningful amount of equity. In addition, we believe compensation to our executives should be based on a balance of short-term and long-term financial performance factors. This approach also supports our retention strategy and promotes our achievement-oriented culture.
•Competitiveness of Pay Position. Target total direct compensation should be competitive with that being offered to individuals holding comparable positions at other public companies with which we compete for executive talent. In general, we position target total direct compensation for our NEOs, as well as each element of total target compensation, to be at or around the median target compensation for executives with similar positions at our peer group companies. When making compensation decisions we also take into consideration other factors such as tenure, performance, and retention risk.
•Maintenance of Governance Standards. We believe that maintaining best-practice executive compensation governance standards is in the best interests of our stockholders and executives and critical to the ability to manage risk.
Elements of Compensation
Our compensation philosophy is supported by the following elements of compensation:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pay Element | How It’s Paid | What It Does | How It Links to Performance |
| Base Salary | Cash
(Fixed) | Provides a competitive, fixed rate of pay relative to similar positions in the market and enables the Company to attract and retain critical executive talent | Based on job scope, level of responsibilities, individual performance, experience, tenure and market levels |
| Short-Term Incentive Plan | Cash
(At-Risk) | Focuses executives on achieving annual financial and strategic goals that enhance long-term stockholder value | –Tied to achievement of targets relating to AOI, Free Cash Flow, Working Capital and Net Sales –No formulaic payouts for performance below threshold –Award capped at 300% of target value with respect to 2022; cap reduced to 200% for 2023 |
| Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Plan | PSUs | Provides incentives for our executive leadership team to execute on longer-term goals that will increase stockholder returns | –Tied to achievement of Relative TSR when compared to peer industrial companies –Vesting follows three-year period based on performance results –Number of shares is capped at 200% of target (100% of target if absolute TSR is negative) |
| RSUs | Supports leadership retention strategy | –Annual vesting over a three-year period –Paid in CIRCOR shares at vesting |
How We Further Foster Stock Ownership and Strengthen Alignment with Stockholders
In order to more closely align the interests of our executives with those of our stockholders, our NEOs are also eligible to participate in the MSPP, which is designed to encourage MSPP eligible participants to invest up to 100% of their own earned incentive compensation in equity of the Company.
The Compensation Committee approves the participants in the MSPP. Participants are entitled to purchase RSUs under the MSPP at a discount of 33% from the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the annual grant date using all or a portion of their pre-tax, short-term incentive award. RSUs purchased under the MSPP vest in whole after a three-year period. Any NEO who resigns from the Company (other than due to retirement) prior to vesting may lose the benefits associated with the discounted purchase price of RSUs purchased under the MSPP, as well as any further appreciation in stock price and accrued dividends associated with such RSUs.
Total Pay Mix at Target
A significant portion of our NEOs' compensation is designed “at risk,” subject to the attainment of specific and measurable performance goals and objectives or subject to the valuation of the Company’s stock price. For example, as shown in the diagram below, 60% of the target total direct compensation of Mr. Najjar, appointed to CEO on August 10, 2022, and 51% of the target total direct compensation of our other NEOs serving at year-end is allocated to a combination of PSUs, RSUs and target bonus; and therefore, based on achieving financial and operating metrics or based on the valuation of the Company's stock price.
The above diagram reflects annualized target total direct compensation as of year-end 2022, which we define to include annualized base salaries, target short-term incentive amounts and the target LTI award amounts used to determine the number of target shares underlying PSU and RSU awards.
Strong Governance Practices Utilized in Determining Executive Compensation
The Role of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee oversees the executive compensation program for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee is comprised of independent, non-employee members of the Board. The Committee works very closely with its independent consultant and management to examine the effectiveness of the Company's executive compensation program throughout the year. Attracting and retaining a team of outstanding executives with complementary skills is one of the Company’s priorities.
When making decisions regarding the compensation of the NEOs, the Compensation Committee considers information required underfrom a variety of sources. The Compensation Committee also regularly assesses our incentive plan measures in light of current business context, relevance to stockholders and alignment with peer company practices. The Compensation Committee analyzes both individual elements, total compensation and pay mix for each of the NEOs that sit on our executive leadership team, while the CEO performs these tasks for our other NEOs and executives. While actual compensation reflects the Company’s performance, the Company’s goal is for total target compensation, as well as each element of total target compensation, to be at or around the median target compensation for executives with similar positions at our peer group companies (described in further detail below). The Compensation Committee also incorporates flexibility into its compensation programs and into the assessment process to respond to changing business needs, and to take into consideration individual performance, including the relative complexity and strategic importance of specific roles.
In setting meaningful performance goals for our STI Plan, the Compensation Committee carefully considers a number of factors, including the general economic and industry climate, anticipated customer spending, projected revenue from current contracts and renewals and deals in the pipeline. Based on these factors, a range of performance scenarios is developed. Goals are then set at the threshold, target and maximum performance levels with the target goals aligning with the Company’s operating plan. CIRCOR strives for alignment between our STI Plan performance targets and our operating plan and the financial guidance we provide externally. In setting performance goals for our LTI Plan, the Compensation Committee considers the same factors as for the STI Plan but over a multi-year timeframe, its long-term objectives and the degree of difficulty in setting extended multi-year financial goals based on the economic and industry climates. We believe achievement of the meaningful performance targets and shareholder return goals that result from this item is incorporatedrigorous goal-setting process will drive long-term value creation for our investors.
The Compensation Committee makes all final compensation and equity award decisions regarding those of our NEOs that are part of the Company's executive leadership team, and the CEO makes all final compensation decisions with respect to our other NEOs and executives.
The Role of Management. The CEO reviews his compensation recommendations pertaining to NEOs and other executives with the Committee providing transparency and oversight. Compensation decisions for those of our NEOs that are not part of our executive leadership team and other non-leadership executives are made by the CEO. The CEO does not participate in the deliberations of the Committee regarding his own compensation.
The Role of the Independent Consultant. The Compensation Committee engages an independent compensation consultant to provide expertise on competitive pay practices, program design, and an objective assessment of any inherent risks of any programs. In 2022, the Committee retained Semler Brossy Consulting Group as its independent consultant. Semler Brossy reports directly to the Committee and does not provide any additional services to management. The Committee has conducted an independence assessment of its consultants in accordance with SEC rules and has determined that there are no conflicts of interests.
The Role of Market References - Peer Group Companies. Our executive compensation program considers the compensation practices of companies with which the Company competes or could compete for executive talent. In its review of 2022 executive compensation, the Compensation Committee compared the Company’s overall compensation structure (mix of pay) and levels (total annual compensation, as well as each component of their total compensation) for those of our NEOs that are part of the executive leadership team with the peer group companies to the extent appropriate position comparisons are available; compensation for our other NEOs was reviewed by reference to market data for comparable roles as reported in commercial salary surveys and the Company's corresponding internal salary ranges based on job level.
Peer group companies generally have similar business models (e.g., multiple product lines, significant concentration of international sales, manufacturing operations) and are within comparable size ranges (e.g., market capitalization, revenue). For the purposes of setting 2022 compensation, and with the support of its prior compensation consultant in 2021, the Compensation Committee considered the following list of peer group companies (the “Peer Group Companies”) which was updated from the prior year:
| | | | | | | | |
| Peer Group Companies for Setting 2022 Compensation |
| Albany International Corp. | Helios Technologies, Inc.(1) | SPX FLOW, Inc.(2) |
| Altra Industrial Motion Corp. | Kadant Inc.(1) | Standex International Corporation |
Astrec Industries, Inc.(1) | Kaman Corporation(1) | Tennant Company |
| Barnes Group Inc. | Mueller Water Products, Inc. | TriMas Corporation |
Ducommun Incorporated(1) | Rexnord Corporation | Watts Water Technologies, Inc. |
| ESCO Technologies, Inc. | SPX Corporation | |
| (1) This company is one of the five new companies that the Compensation Committee added to our peer group list following its review in 2021, replacing the following companies that were removed from the prior list: Chart Industries, Inc., Enerpac Tool Group Corp., EnPro Industries, Inc., Forum Energy Technologies, Inc., and NN, Inc. |
| (2) This company became a privately owned company during 2022 and as a result is no longer a component of our peer group. |
The Committee also reviewed supplemental market survey data as part of its subjective determination of 2022 target compensation levels for our NEOs. When reviewing market survey data, to the extent available the Compensation Committee relies on size-appropriate general industry survey data based on annual revenue. In its 2022 compensation review, the survey data was sourced from the 2021 Willis Towers Watson General Industry Executive Survey Report.
2022 Stockholder Engagement & Say-on-Pay Results
The Company regularly evaluates its compensation programs and considers the results of its most recent stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay”), as well as feedback received directly from stockholders through our ongoing engagement.
At the October 2022 annual meeting of stockholders, we received say-on-pay support of approximately 98%. This result indicated continued support for the Company’s definitive proxy statement pursuantexecutive compensation program. Going forward, we plan to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filedcontinue to engage with our stockholders and consider their perspectives regarding compensation and governance matters.
2022 Executive Compensation in Detail
As set forth above, the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the closeprincipal elements of the Company’s executive compensation program consist of base salary, annual short-term incentives, and long-term incentives. Each of these elements is described in detail below with respect to 2022 compensation.
Base Salary
NEOs' base salaries are generally determined by evaluating factors such as the responsibilities and complexity of the position, the experience and performance of the individual, market data for similar roles, overall company performance and internal equity within the Company.
At the beginning of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee generally reviews and adjusts the base salaries for each of the Company’s executives, with any adjustments to become effective on or about April 1st of that year. Due to the interim appointments made to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer roles in January 2022 and the subsequent permanent appointments to these roles made in August of 2022, among other leadership changes, the Compensation Committee made adjustments to NEO salaries at multiple points during the year. The table below illustrates the total impact of such changes for each NEO, with further details set forth in the corresponding footnotes:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | 2021
Year-End Base Salary | 2022
Year-End Base Salary | % Change |
Tony Najjar(1) | $396,500 | $665,000 | 67.7% |
Arjun Sharma(2) | $371,000 | $499,000 | 34.5% |
| Jessica Wenzell | $390,000 | $406,000 | 4.1% |
Forrest Tiedeman(3) | $225,000 | $260,000 | 15.6% |
Scott Buckhout(4) | $810,000 | N/A | |
Amit Goel(5) | $360,000 | N/A | |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Mr. Najjar received a 7.1% salary adjustment in January 2022 in connection with his appointment to Chief Operating Officer (increasing his salary to $425,000) plus a temporary monthly stipend of $20,000 in connection with his appointment to Interim Chief Executive Officer (also effective in January 2022). He later received a 56.5% salary increase in August 2022 in connection with his permanent appointment to Chief Executive Officer (coinciding with the cessation of the monthly stipend). |
| (2) | Mr. Sharma received a temporary biweekly stipend of $4,500 effective January 2022 in connection with his appointment to Interim Chief Financial Officer, plus a 3.0% salary increase in March 2022 (increasing his salary to $382,000). He later received a 30.6% salary increase in August 2022 in connection with his permanent appointment to Chief Financial Officer (coinciding with the cessation of the bi-weekly stipend). |
| (3) | Mr. Tiedeman received a 1.9% merit increase in March 2022 in connection with his services as Vice President, Tax, increasing his salary to $229,119, and a 13.5% increase in September 2022 in connection his taking on the additional role of Vice President, Treasury. |
| (4) | Mr. Buckhout terminated employment on January 19, 2022. He received no salary increase in 2022. |
| (5) | Mr. Goel received a 4.0% merit increase in March 2022, increasing his salary to $374,400, prior to his termination of employment on September 9, 2022. |
The decisions made with respect to Mr. Najjar's and Mr. Sharma's compensation were influenced by the transitional nature of their appointments during a period of significant leadership change following the departures of the former chief financial officer on December 31, 2021 and Mr. Buckhout's departure on January 19, 2022. The Compensation Committee's decisions with respect to (1) Mr. Najjar's salary increase in January 2022, (2) the temporary stipend compensation for Messrs. Najjar and Sharma in January 2022, and (3) the subsequent decisions in August to roll the annualized stipend amounts into base salary upon their permanent appointments to Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, were based on the Committee's assessment of what they viewed as appropriate compensation levels for newly appointed officers in these public company leadership roles. Additional compensation actions were also taken for Messrs. Najjar and Sharma upon their new appointments as discussed further under "Retention Incentive Compensation" and "Other 2022 Compensation Actions".
The increases to Mr. Sharma's, Ms. Wenzell's, Mr. Tiedeman's and Mr. Goel's salary in March of 2022 was based on merit in connection with prior year performance, and in the case of Mr. Sharma and Ms. Wenzel, such decisions were made in reference to specific peer market data with Mr. Sharma's resulting salary comparing slightly above median and Ms. Wenzell's salary comparing below median.
Short-Term Incentive Plan
Target Award Opportunities. The STI Plan provides our NEOs the opportunity to earn a performance-based annual cash bonus. Actual bonus payouts depend on the achievement of pre-established performance objectives and can range from 0% to 300% of target award amounts (0% to 200% with respect to the 2023 STI Plan), depending on the financial measure. Target annual award opportunities for the NEOs are approved by the Compensation Committee and are intended to be competitive in the market in which the Company competes for talent and reflect the level of responsibility of the role. They are, therefore, set at or around the median for comparable positions in the market. For 2022, target award amounts, which are stated as a percentage of base salary, were as follows:
| | | | | |
| NEO | Target Award Opportunity (as % of base salary) |
| Tony Najjar | 75% |
| Arjun Sharma | 65% |
| Jessica Wenzell | 60% |
Forrest Tiedeman(1) | 30% |
Scott Buckhout(2) | 110% |
Amit Goel(2) | 45% |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Reflects Mr. Tiedeman's STI target effective September 19, 2022 in connection with his appointment to Vice President, Treasury and Tax. Prior to this appointment, his target was 25% of salary. The 2022 STI award calculation was determined based on the pro-ration of these target award percentages to reflect the portion of the year that each target was in effect. |
| (2) | Was not eligible to receive any payment under the 2022 STI Plan as a result of termination of employment in 2022. |
Performance Measures, Weightings and Goals. Our STI Plan pays participants based on levels of performance against rigorous metrics established by the Compensation Committee. For 2022, STI awards for NEOs were based on specific performance achievements, as calculated based on the following performance measures and weightings:
| | | | | |
| Performance Measures | Weightings |
COO Functional Leadership Result(1) | 60% |
| CIRCOR AOI | 20% |
| CIRCOR Free Cash Flow | 20% |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Reflects STI Plan results from the table below but excluding the impact of CIRCOR AOI on such results. |
For the 2022 STI Plan, the COO Functional Leadership score is determined based on composite results for our A&D and Industrial segments (collectively, "Group Composite") relative to our 2022 financial plan, determined as follows:
| | | | | |
| Performance Measures | Weight |
| Group Composite AOI | 35% |
| CIRCOR AOI | 30% |
| Group Composite Adjusted Working Capital % of Sales | 20% |
| Group Composite Net Sales | 15% |
The table below summarizes the Threshold, Target, Stretch and Above Stretch performance levels and the calculated results for each STI Plan performance measure in effect for our NEOs in 2022. For performance between Threshold, Target, Stretch and Above Stretch, bonus pool funding is determined by linear interpolation.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (expressed in millions except percentages) |
| Measure(1) | Threshold | Target | Stretch | Above Stretch | Achievement Results(2) | Adjusted Achievement Results(2)(3) |
| Group Composite AOI | $86.0 | $122.8 | $159.7 | $196.5 | $119.2 | $124.9 |
| Group Composite AWC % of Sales | 39.4% | 27.6% | 21.2% | 17.3% | 31.5% | 31.6% |
| Group Composite Net Sales | $662.2 | $827.7 | $993.3 | $1,158.8 | $822.7 | $819.5 |
| CIRCOR AOI | $72.0 | $90.0 | $108.0 | $126.0 | $95.7 | $101.4 |
| CIRCOR Free Cash Flow | $38.5 | $55.0 | $71.5 | $88.0 | $(22.7) | $(22.7) |
| | | | | | |
| Plan Funding as % of Target Bonus (2) | 50.0% | 100.0% | 200% | 300.0% | See table below | See table below |
| | | | | |
| (1) | STI Plan measures are calculated using a set foreign exchange rate. That same rate is used to calculate Achievement Results. The Compensation Committee believes that it is important to use a set exchange rate for metric and result calculations to reduce the impact on the level of achievement of metrics caused by fluctuations in exchange rates, which are beyond the control of our NEOs. |
| (2) | To achieve funding above Target level with respect to Group Composite AWC% of Sales, Group Composite AOI achievement must be at or above Threshold; to achieve funding above Target level with respect to Group Composite Net Sales, Group Composite AOI achievement must be at or above Target; to achieve funding above Target level with respect to CIRCOR Free Cash Flow, CIRCOR AOI achievement must be at or above Threshold. |
| (3) | Reflects the adjusted results used to determine final 2022 STI awards for our NEOs. The Compensation Committee determined that 2022 STI Plan results should be calculated excluding the impact of the Pipeline Engineering business, which the Company exited in 2022, and excluding the impact of sales-lease-back transactions that, while aligned with our long-term strategic goals, had an adverse accounting impact to our 2022 AOI results. These adjustments were applied to all participants in the STI Plan. |
Based on the outlook at the time the goals were set, the Compensation Committee concluded that these performance goals struck an appropriate balance in providing both a reasonable probability of attainment and sufficient rigor and motivation of superior performance. The Compensation Committee considered the probability of achievement of different levels of performance as well as the uncertainty of the Company’s performance in 2022.
2022 Short-Term Incentive Plan Results
Our NEOs shared in the STI payments based on the approved STI Plan funding results as set forth in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | STI Plan
Alignment | Pro-Rata Factor | Pro-Rated Target STI Amount | STI Plan Funding Result(2) | Actual Award
(in Dollars) |
Tony Najjar(1) | COO Function | 60.5% | $192,997 | 138.4% | $267,169 |
| Corporate | 39.5% | $196,767 | 106.7% | $209,915 |
| Combined Total | 100.0% | $389,764 | 122.4% | $477,084 |
| Arjun Sharma | Corporate | 100.0% | $324,350 | 106.7% | $346,023 |
| Jessica Wenzell | Corporate | 100.0% | $243,600 | 106.7% | $259,877 |
Forrest Tiedeman(3) | Corporate | 100.0% | $63,184 | 106.7% | $67,405 |
Scott Buckhout(4) | Corporate | N/A | N/A | N/A | $— |
Amit Goel(4) | Corporate | N/A | N/A | N/A | $— |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Mr. Najjar's 2022 STI Plan amount reflects a pro-ration between (1) the STI Plan component that he was assigned to and his corresponding salary in connection with his service as Chief Operating Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer up through August 9, 2022 and (2) the STI Plan component he was assigned to and corresponding salary in connection with his service as President and Chief Executive Officer effective August 10, 2022. Each of his STI Plan components was calculated using a target award of 75% of salary. |
| (2) | Reflects the results of the adjusted STI Plan measures approved by the Compensation Committee, as described in note 3 of the preceding table. |
| (3) | Mr. Tiedeman's Pro-Rated Target STI Amount reflects the pro-rated increase of his target % of salary from 25% to 30% effective September 19, 2022 in connection with his appointment to Vice President, Treasury and Tax . |
| (4) | Did not receive any payment under the 2022 STI Plan as a result of his termination of employment in 2022. |
Historical Alignment of Performance and STI Plan Results
The chart below depicts our track record of past payouts for Corporate NEOs under our STI Plan over the last five years:
| | | | | |
| (1) | 2020 payout percentage reflects adjustment approved by the Compensation Committee from the actual 28.3% of target achieved. |
| (2) | 2022 payout percentage reflects the actual performance results using the adjusted performance measures approved by the Compensation Committee; without adjustment, the payout percentage would have been 81.1% of target. |
Management Stock Purchase Plan (“MSPP”)
In connection with our 2022 STI Plan payments, consistent with past practice, some of our NEOs made an advanced election to apply all or a portion of their 2022 STI Plan cash bonus payment towards the purchase of RSUs under the MSPP. The table below outlines the MSPP deferral election made by our NEOs prior to the beginning of 2022.
| | | | | |
| NEO | 2022 Cash Bonus Deferral - Election |
| Tony Najjar | 30% |
| Arjun Sharma | 100% |
| Jessica Wenzell | 10% |
| Forrest Tiedeman | —% |
Scott Buckhout(1) | 80% |
| Amit Goel | —% |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Although Mr. Buckhout elected to participate in the MSPP with respect to the 2022 STI payout, he was not eligible to participate in the 2022 STI payment as a result of his termination of employment on January 19, 2022. |
Long-Term Incentive Awards
LTI awards are intended to provide executives with a continuing stake in the long-term success of the Company and to align their interests with those of stockholders. LTI awards are also used to attract, retain and motivate executives responsible for the Company’s long-term success.
The Compensation Committee evaluates the Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTI Plan”) annually relative to its objectives as well as practices within the Peer Group Companies. For our 2022 LTI grants, we continued to use Relative TSR as the performance measure for our PSUs, which compares our performance against a peer group of companies within the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index, as described in more detail below. Using Relative TSR aligns our leadership team's compensation with stockholder interests by rewarding for TSR performance above peers and also aligns the three-year cliff performance and vesting periods with peer market practice.
For those of our NEOs that are part of our executive leadership team, comprised of Messrs. Najjar, Sharma and Ms. Wenzell at the time of the 2022 grant, the 2022 LTI Plan included an equal mix of PSUs and time-based RSUs. The Committee believes that using a mix of performance and time-based awards for our leadership team provides balance to the LTI Plan with substantial alignment to shareholder interests with the TSR measure and mitigates retention risk for our NEOs in periods when performance may lag our peers. For our other NEOs, the 2022 LTI Plan awards were delivered using 100% time-based RSUs subject to continued employment with the Company on the date of vesting, creating a strong retention incentive particularly during this period of uncertainty for the Company.
Our annual LTI awards are typically awarded in March shortly following the filing of our annual report for the preceding fiscal year, with our PSU performance period generally set to a three-year period ending on the last day of February preceding the three-year anniversary of the award (the cliff vesting date), and our time-based RSUs set with a graded vesting schedule of one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of the award date. With regard to our 2022 LTI awards granted on August 15, 2022, we modified our vesting schedule slightly as a result of the delayed timing of our annual grant date following the July 2022 filing our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K, with the PSU cliff vesting date set to March 15, 2025 (following the three-year performance period ending February 28, 2025) and with our time-based RSU vesting schedule set to one-third on each of August 15, 2023 (the one-year anniversary of the award date and the minimum vesting period allowed for in our LTI Plan), March 15, 2024 and March 15, 2025. The purpose of the modified vesting schedule was to maintain our traditional cadence of LTI vesting dates occurring in the March timeframe, consistent with prior awards.
Target LTI awards for each of our NEOs in 2022 was expressed in dollar amounts and varied based on consideration of factors such as role, level of responsibility, performance, past award history, and market practice for similar roles as it relates to LTI award levels and total target direct compensation:
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | Target PSU Award Value(1) | Target RSU Award Value(1) | Total Target
LTI Value |
| Tony Najjar | $250,000 | $250,000 | $500,000 |
| Arjun Sharma | $200,000 | $200,000 | $400,000 |
| Jessica Wenzell | $187,500 | $187,500 | $375,000 |
Forrest Tiedeman(2) | $— | $40,000 | $40,000 |
Scott Buckhout(3) | $— | $— | $— |
Amit Goel(4) | $— | $150,000 | $150,000 |
| | | | | |
| (1) | The number of share units underlying the PSUs and RSUs was determined based on the average per share price of the Company’s common stock for the 11 consecutive trading days ending on August 12, 2022, rounding up for any fractional shares. The corresponding grant date fair value of these awards as reported in the Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan Based Awards Table differs from the values listed above since we generally account for these types of awards using the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day preceding the grant date and, with regard to PSUs, the grant date fair value is determined based on a Monte Carlo simulation that takes into account the probability of all possible stock price outcomes and Relative TSR performance between the start of the performance period (March 1, 2022) and the grant date (August 15, 2022). |
| (2) | Mr. Tiedeman's target award above was in effect on the award date with respect to his position as Vice President, Tax. His target award was increased to $60,000, to be effective with the 2023 award cycle, in connection with his additional appointment as Vice President, Treasury, effective October 1, 2022. |
| (3) | Mr. Buckhout did not participate in the 2022 LTI awards, having terminated employment with CIRCOR prior to the grant date. |
| (4) | The award for Mr. Goel was subsequently forfeited in connection with his termination of employment on September 9, 2022. |
As noted above, the 2022 performance metric for the PSU portion of awards is based on Relative TSR, which measures the Company’s return to stockholders in the form of stock price appreciation and assuming reinvestment of any dividends over a three-year period relative to that of other peer industrial companies (the "TSR Peer Group"). The TSR Peer Group is comprised of a custom group of companies listed on the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index, which includes other mid-sized industrial companies that are comparable to the current profile of the Company. Specifically, with respect to the 2022 awards, "S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index" means each company that was in the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index as of March 1, 2022 and continues to be a member of such index through February 28, 2025 (and including any companies that become bankrupt or insolvent prior to such date) but excluding companies in the following five industries due to the higher concentration of services in their business mix relative to the Company: Diversified Support Services, Environmental & Facilities Services, Human Resources & Employment Services, Office Services & Supplies, and Research & Consulting Services (collectively, the companies in these five excluded industries are comprised of: ABM Industries Incorporated, Exponent, Inc., Forrester Research, Inc., Harsco Corporation, Healthcare Services Group, Inc., Heidrick & Struggles International, Inc., HNI Corporation, Interface, Inc., KAR Auction Services, Inc., Kelly Services, Inc., Korn Ferry, ManTech International Corporation, Matthews International Corporation, Pitney Bowes Inc., Resources Connection, Inc., TrueBlue, Inc., Unifirst Corporation, and Viad Corp).
Final award value is determined after completion of the three-year performance period (as described below) based on the following schedule, subject in each case to (1) a vesting limit of no more than the number of target shares awarded if absolute TSR over the three year performance period is negative (the "Negative Return Cap") and (2) a limit on the value of shares than can vest, determined as of the last day of the performance period, equal to a maximum of six hundred percent (600%) of the product of (i) the number of target shares awarded, times (ii) the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the grant date (the “600% Cap”). If the 600% Cap is exceeded, the number of PSUs that would otherwise become earned PSUs will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the 600% Cap being exceeded.
| | | | | |
| Company TSR Relative to the TSRs of the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Companies for the Performance Period | Earned Vesting Percentage (% of target shares awarded that will vest)(1)(2) |
| Below 25th Percentile | 0% |
| 25th Percentile | 50% |
| 50th Percentile | 100% |
| 75th Percentile or Higher | 200% (Maximum) |
| (1) To the extent performance falls between two levels in the table above, linear interpolation shall apply in determining the percentage of the PSUs that are earned. |
| (2) Subject to the Negative Return Cap and/or the 600% Cap, as applicable, as defined in the preceding paragraph. |
As of December 31, 2022, the Company's Relative TSR with respect to its 2022 PSU award from the beginning of the performance period of March 1, 2022 was at the 29th percentile. Final performance results for this award will be measured through February 28, 2025 with vesting set to occur on March 15, 2025.
Prior Year PSU Results
LTI awards made to our executive leadership team in 2021 and 2020 were also delivered in a 50/50 mix of RSUs and PSUs.
2021 PSU Award: The performance criteria for the 2021 PSU awards is based on relative total shareholder return with respect to members of the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Index as it was constituted on February 26, 2021 that continue to be members of such index during the three year performance period ending February 29, 2024 but excluding the following companies that the Compensation Committee determined were inappropriate comparisons due to the higher concentration of services in their business mix relative to the Company: Exponent, Inc., Forrester Research, Inc., Heidrick and Struggles International, Inc, Interface, Inc., Kelly Services, Inc., Korn Ferry, Matthews International Corporation, Pitney Bowes, Inc., Resources Connection Inc., True Blue Inc., Unifirst Corporation, US Ecology Inc., and Viad Corp. The final award value of the 2021 PSU award is determined after completion of the three-year performance period using the same earned vesting percentage schedule as set forth above for the 2022 PSU award.
As of December 31, 2022, the Company's Relative TSR with respect to its 2021 PSU award from the beginning of the performance period of February 26, 2021 was below the 25th percentile. Final performance results for this award will be measured through February 29, 2024 with vesting set to occur on March 17, 2024.
2020 PSU Award: The performance criteria for the 2020 PSUs is based on cumulative performance over three years. For each performance year in the three-year performance period, cumulative goals were set for Adjusted MCF and AOM and performance is assessed at the end of each year to determine the number of shares to vest.
The PSUs will vest only if the pre-established goals are met. PSUs that do not vest in years one or two of the performance period due to performance results may vest in a subsequent year up to 100% if the cumulative performance in years two and/or three, as applicable, is 100% of target or above. Performance at threshold achievement level results in .01% of target shares vesting; performance at target achievement level results in 100% of target shares vesting; and performance at maximum achievement level or better results in a maximum of 200% of target shares vesting, in each case subject to interpolation of vesting percentage results should performance results fall between such thresholds.
For the third and final vesting tranche of the PSUs granted in 2020 (reflecting cumulative results for 2020, 2021 and 2022), the Company’s performance fell below the threshold for Adjusted MCF and Average AOM resulting in zero shares vesting, as detailed below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Performance Measures
(50/50 weighting) | Performance Range | Actual Performance | %
Payout | Shares Earned and Vested |
| Threshold | Target | Maximum |
| Fiscal Years 2020-2022 Adjusted MCF | $127.2M | $159.0M | $190.8M | $31.2M | —% | 0 |
| Fiscal Years 2020-2022 AOM | 11.0% | 13.7% | 16.4% | 8.5% | —% | 0 |
As no shares vested in each of the three vesting tranches, the entire 2020 PSU award was forfeited for all participants, including Messrs. Najjar, Sharma and Buckhout.
2022 Retention Incentive Compensation
2022 presented several challenges to the Company with respect to stabilizing its leadership team during a prolonged period of uncertainty following (1) the termination of our former chief financial officer on December 31, 2021, (2) the termination of our former CEO, Mr. Buckhout, three weeks later in January 2022, (3) the significant work involved with restating our financial statements following the accounting irregularities found in our former Pipeline business segment in early 2022, and (4) the announcement that our Board was to engage in a review of potential strategic alternatives. These events framed many discussions by management and our Compensation Committee regarding retention strategy, including for certain of our NEOs as described below.
In connection with our former chief financial officer's termination of employment on December 31, 2021 and our search for a new chief financial officer, the Compensation Committee approved retention awards for those of our NEOs that were integral to our financial reporting, disclosure and corporate governance processes in early 2022. These awards were made to retain experienced executives to provide continuity of leadership for these important functions through the end of 2022:
•Mr. Sharma, in connection with his appointment to interim Chief Financial Officer effective January 1, 2022, received (1) an additional $4,500 per bi-weekly pay period during the term of his interim role, (2) payment on his behalf up to $65,000 towards an executive management education program, (3) a retention bonus installment in the amount of $95,000 following June 30, 2022, and (4) a second retention bonus installment in the amount of $45,000 following December 31, 2022.
•Ms. Wenzell, in connection with her General Counsel role, received a retention bonus installment in the amount of $100,000 following the filing of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and received a second retention bonus installment in the amount of $50,000 following December 31, 2022.
•Mr. Goel, in connection with his critical role of Chief Accounting Officer, received a retention bonus installment in the amount of $150,000 following the filing of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and was eligible to receive a second retention bonus installment in the amount of $100,000 following December 31, 2022 had his employment continued until this date; this second installment was subsequently forfeited by Mr. Goel's upon his resignation from the Company.
Payment of each of the above bonus installments was subject to (1) continued employment, (2) absence of a notice from the executive or from the Company of intent to terminate employment and (3) satisfactory performance through the applicable scheduled installment payment dates and, additionally, payment of the first bonus installment was subject to repayment to the Company in the event of termination of employment for cause prior to December 31, 2022. Mr. Sharma's retention installments, to the extent not already paid, were subject to full payment in the event the Company terminated his employment without cause. Ms. Wenzell's and Mr. Goel's retention installments, to the extent not already paid, were subject to payment on a pro-rata basis in the event the Company provided notice of its intent to terminate employment without cause. In all cases, the retention bonuses, to the extent not already paid, were payable in the event of a qualifying termination of employment in connection with a change in control transaction.
In mid-2022, as a result of the continued volatility at the Company and the Compensation Committee’s recognition of the importance of maintaining continuity in the executive leadership team, the Company entered into additional retention agreements with certain of its NEOs:
•In July 2022, the Compensation Committee approved retention awards for Mr. Najjar ($40,000), Mr. Sharma ($74,000), Ms. Wenzell ($78,000) and Mr. Goel ($52,000), in each case, to be paid in two equal installments on August 31 and November 30 of 2022. The payment terms for Mr. Goel's award was later modified to be an "end of service" award, payable following his September 2022 termination of employment, in recognition of Mr. Goel's efforts in helping the Company through its financial restatements.
•The Company also entered into a retention agreement with Mr. Tiedeman in May of 2022 whereby Mr. Tiedeman received a retention bonus installment in the amount of $57,500 following the filing of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, and is eligible to receive a second retention bonus installment in the amount of $57,500 following the filing of our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
Payment of each of the above bonus installments is subject to (1) continued employment, (2) absence of a notice from the executive of intent to terminate employment and (3) satisfactory performance through the applicable scheduled installment payment dates and, additionally, payment of the first bonus installment was subject to repayment to the Company in the event of termination of employment for cause prior payment of the last installment. In the event of a without cause termination by the Company prior to receiving the last installment, Mr. Tiedeman's award provides for a pro-rata payment and the other awards provided for a full payment. In all cases, the retention bonuses, to the extent not already paid, were payable in the event of a qualifying termination of employment in connection with a change in control transaction.
Other 2022 Compensation Actions
In conjunction with the departure of Mr. Buckhout on January 19, 2022 and the announcement that our Board had initiated a review of potential strategic alternatives in response to multiple inquiries from third parties about a possible transaction, the Compensation Committee and/or the Board took the following additional actions to address the promotions and changes in role and responsibilities for each of Messrs. Najjar and Sharma:
•For Mr. Najjar, in connection with his appointment to Chief Operating Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer effective January 19, 2022, the Board approved (1) an increase in base salary from $396,500 to $425,000, (2) an increase in STI target for 2022 from 60% to 65% of base salary, (3) a 2022 LTI grant in the amount of $500,000, and (4) for his interim role, additional compensation of $20,000 per month during the term of his interim role and a special $250,000 RSU grant schedule to vest one year following grant (with vesting accelerated if Mr. Najjar’s employment with the Company is terminated for a reason other than for cause) to be granted upon the earlier of the conclusion of his interim role or immediately prior to a change of control event.
•Upon Mr. Najjar's subsequent appointment to President and Chief Executive Officer effective August 10, 2022, the Board approved (1) an increase in base salary from to $665,000 (equaling the annualized total of his prior salary rate of $425,000 plus his $20,000 per month stipend), (2) an increase in STI target for 2022 from 65% to 75% of base salary, retroactive to the beginning of 2022, and (3) continuation of his LTI annual grant target in the amount of $500,000. The special $250,000 RSU award referenced in the preceding paragraph was granted on August 15, 2022 in connection with the end of Mr. Najjar's interim role.
•Upon Mr. Sharma's appointment to Chief Financial Officer effective August 10, 2022, the Board approved (1) an increase in base salary to $499,000 (equaling the annualized total of his prior salary rate of $382,000 plus his $4,500 biweekly stipend for his previous appointment to Interim Chief Financial Officer), (2) an increase in STI target for 2022 from 60% to 65% of base salary, retroactive to the beginning of 2022, and (3) continuation of his LTI annual grant target in the amount of $400,000.
Additionally, in connection with the filing delay of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 and the corresponding delay in the grant of our 2022 LTI awards, the Compensation Committee conditionally approved the cash settlement of these LTI awards in the event that a change in control transaction was consummated prior to the grant date. This action was taken to provide our executives with a measure of certainty regarding their compensation during a period of significant uncertainty about the future ownership and leadership structure of the Company. Ultimately, upon the grant of our 2022 LTI Awards in August, this conditional approval became irrelevant.
Other Executive Compensation Practices & Policies
Long-Term Incentive Grant Practices
Most LTI awards are granted at the time of the annual grant in the first quarter of the year, although awards may be granted as part of the hiring process or in connection with a change in responsibility. LTI awards granted during the year have a grant date no earlier than the date of approval. Grants for our executive officers are typically reviewed and approved at a regularly scheduled Compensation Committee meeting or by written consent in advance of the individual’s employment commencement or promotion date. For these awards, the grant date is the date of the meeting if the individual receiving the grant has already commenced employment. If the individual has not yet commenced employment, the date of grant is the business day following the individual’s first day of employment.
For our 2022 annual LTI awards, the grant date occurred later in the year than is typical as a result of the delay in the filing of our 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The annual award was made on August 15, 2022 and the number of share units underlying each award was determined by dividing the award value by the average per share price of the Company’s common stock for the 11 consecutive trading days ending on August 12, 2022, rounding up for any fractional shares. The method of averaging share prices over a period of time for determining the number of share units to award was introduced in the first quarter of 2020, in lieu of using the closing price on the grant date, during a highly volatile period in the trading price of our stock. Using this approach ensures that the number of share units awarded is not inflated due the closing price on the grant date.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
To further align the interests of the executive officers of the Company with the interests of the stockholders, the Company has adopted Stock Ownership Guidelines for executive officers. These guidelines establish an expectation that, within a five-year period, each such executive shall achieve and maintain an equity interest in the Company at least equal to a specified multiple of such individual’s annual base salary. The applicable multiples are as follows:
| | | | | |
| Position | Target |
| Chief Executive Officer | 5x annual base salary |
| Chief Financial Officer | 3x annual base salary |
| Corporate Senior Vice Presidents | 2x annual base salary |
In calculating an individual’s equity interest, credit is given for (i) the value of actual shares of Common Stock owned beneficially, (ii) the before-tax value of all vested stock options and (iii) the before-tax value of all outstanding RSU awards (including those which the individual has received in lieu of bonus compensation). The calculation of an individual’s equity interest, however, does not include the value of any outstanding equity awards subject to risk of forfeiture by virtue of performance.
An annual review is conducted by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to assess compliance with the guidelines. As of December 31, 2022, Mr. Sharma met his ownership guideline and Ms. Wenzell was on schedule to meet her guideline with the five year accumulation period. Mr. Najjar, as a result of his promotion to President and Chief Executive Officer with its five-times salary ownership target, was not yet on track to meet this guideline. Mr. Najjar's compensation was scheduled to be reviewed by the Compensation Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
Clawback Policy
Under our clawback policy, in the event of a restatement of the Company’s financial results, the Board may recover or require reimbursement of incentive compensation received by a NEO during the three completed fiscal years immediately preceding the date on which we are required to prepare a restatement. In addition, if the Board determines that a NEO engaged in misconduct, then the Board shall take such action as it deems to be in the Company’s best interest and necessary to remedy the misconduct or acts/omissions of the NEO and prevent their recurrence, including recovery or required reimbursement of incentive compensation. Misconduct for this purpose includes, but is not limited to, fraudulent, criminal or other willful misconduct, any action or inaction that causes harm, willful and material breach of Company policies, breach of confidentiality obligations or withholding of material information from or misstatement to the Board. Any recoupment under this policy may be in addition to, and shall not otherwise limit, any other remedies that may be available to the Company under applicable law, including disciplinary actions up to and including termination of employment. The Company intends to adopt a revised
clawback policy that complies with the newly adopted Rule 10D-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the listing standards implementing such rule.
In 2022, the Company did encounter an event that triggered a restatement of previously filed financial results. As disclosed in our Form 8-K issued on March 13, 2022 and in connection with accounting irregularities in the financial statements with respect to the Company’s now former Pipeline Engineering business unit, the Company issued restated financial statements in July 2022 for the previously issued consolidated financial statements and related disclosures for (i) the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2020 included in its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, (ii) each of the quarterly and year-to-date periods for 2020 and (iii) the quarterly and year-to-date periods for the nine months ended October 3, 2021.
In light of this restatement activity, the Compensation Committee consulted with its advisors to assess if any compensation previously paid to its executives should be recouped given the events that transpired in our Pipeline Engineering business segment. After thoroughly reviewing the facts and circumstances, including the payment amounts that were in scope over the last three years, the Committee determined that it was in the best interest of the Company to not pay any 2021 STI award to Mr. Buckhout, our President and CEO during the restatement periods in question or to our former President, Industrial Group who was also in service during the restatement periods up until his termination of employment in 2021 but who remained eligible to participate in the 2021 STI award payout as a condition of his termination. The Committee also decided to not payout any portion of the last vesting tranche of the 2019 PSU award (covering cumulative performance over the 2019, 2020, and 2021 periods) for any participants (including Messrs. Najjar, Sharma, and Buckhout) since prior payouts for earlier vesting tranches of that award would have been reduced had they been determined based on the restated award results. The Company did not pursue any further recoupments after careful consideration of the amounts involved and the corresponding costs of pursuing recovery.
Insider Trading, Anti-Hedging & Anti-Pledging Policies
We maintain an insider trading policy that prohibits hedging the economic risk of ownership of our stock by all directors, executive officers and certain designated employees. No person who is considered an “insider” of the Company, which includes each of our NEOs and directors, may directly or indirectly sell any securities of the Company that are not owned by the person at the time of the sale (short sale). Such persons also may not purchase or sell puts, calls, options or other derivative instruments in respect of our securities at any time without the approval of the Company’s Clearance Officer. We also do not allow officers or directors to pledge Company stock.
Risk Assessment and Mitigation of Compensation Policies and Practices
The Compensation Committee has reviewed our incentive compensation programs, discussed the concept of risk as it relates to our compensation program, considered various mitigating factors and reviewed these items with its various independent consultants. Based on these reviews and discussions, the Compensation Committee does not believe our compensation program creates risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our business.
As part of its ongoing responsibilities, the Compensation Committee has engaged its current consultant, Semler Brossy, to conduct an independent risk assessment of our executive compensation programs in 2023.
Other Benefits
The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) plan in which substantially all of our U.S. employees, including our NEOs, are eligible to participate. We also maintain a nonqualified deferred compensation plan to provide benefits, at the Company’s discretion, that would otherwise be provided under the qualified 401(k) plan to certain participants but for the imposition of certain maximum statutory limits imposed on qualified plan benefits (for example, annual limits on eligible pay and contributions).
We also provide certain of our NEOs with a limited number of perquisites as part of their compensation arrangements, which we consider to be reasonable and consistent with competitive practice. These perquisites include annual car allowances and financial counseling/tax preparation services, which, in total, comprise a de minimis part of the NEO’s target total direct compensation.
Severance and Change in Control Agreements
In order to attract and retain key executives, the Company has entered into severance and change in control agreements with certain of our NEOs, including a special severance agreement entered into with Mr. Buckhout in connection with his termination of employment, as discussed in “Severance and Other Benefits upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.” In instances that we do not enter into specific agreements with our NEOs, we provide severance protection through employee policies.
The agreements and plans are intended to support management continuity and align with market practice. The change in control protections are intended to maintain focus on stockholder value creation in the event of an actual or threatened change in control. Pursuant to Company policy, the Company does not provide tax gross-ups in connection with any compensatory arrangements. As a result, we do not have any change in control agreements or severance plans that provide for tax gross-ups. More detail is provided below in “Severance and Other Benefits upon Termination of Employment or Change in Control.”
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 162(m)) generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation paid in excess of $1 million for any fiscal year to a company's chief executive officer or specified other current or former executive officers. The Company has implemented a process to identify this excess compensation amount and to not deduct this amount on the U.S. Federal and State income tax returns.
SUMMARY OF CASH AND CERTAIN OTHER COMPENSATION AND
OTHER PAYMENTS TO THE NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following sections provide a summary of cash and certain other amounts earned by the NEOs in Fiscal Year 2022 (and the preceding two fiscal years). We encourage you to read the following tables closely. The narratives preceding the tables and the footnotes accompanying each table are important parts of each table. Also, we encourage you to read this section in conjunction with the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above.
2022 Summary Compensation Table | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and
Principal Position | Year | Salary(1) | Bonus(2) | Stock Awards(3) | Option
Awards | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(4) | All Other Compensation(5) | Total |
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) |
| Tony Najjar President and Chief Executive Officer (6) | 2022 | $ | 649,290 | | $ | 158,097 | | $ | 778,755 | | $ | — | | $ | 358,987 | | $ | 15,616 | | $ | 1,960,745 | |
| 2021 | $ | 393,846 | | $ | — | | $ | 477,828 | | $ | — | | $ | 90,057 | | $ | 14,031 | | $ | 975,762 | |
| 2020 | $ | 345,962 | | $ | 79,356 | | $ | 368,095 | | $ | — | | $ | 128,544 | | $ | 2,835 | | $ | 924,792 | |
| Arjun Sharma Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Business Development (7) | 2022 | $ | 494,212 | | $ | 252,058 | | $ | 426,978 | | $ | — | | $ | 262,965 | | $ | 22,581 | | $ | 1,458,794 | |
| 2021 | $ | 368,462 | | $ | — | | $ | 526,926 | | $ | — | | $ | 69,505 | | $ | 22,401 | | $ | 987,294 | |
| 2020 | $ | 315,712 | | $ | 100,813 | | $ | 395,605 | | $ | — | | $ | 61,187 | | $ | 14,342 | | $ | 887,659 | |
| Jessica Wenzell Senior Vice President, General Counsel & Chief People Officer | 2022 | $ | 402,308 | | $ | 240,380 | | $ | 368,287 | | $ | — | | $ | 197,497 | | $ | 13,168 | | $ | 1,221,640 | |
| 2021 | $ | 368,000 | | $ | — | | $ | 279,469 | | $ | — | | $ | 73,064 | | $ | 13,890 | | $ | 734,423 | |
| Forrest Tiedeman Vice President, Treasury and Tax (8) | 2022 | $ | 236,483 | | $ | 73,680 | | $ | 43,941 | | $ | — | | $ | 51,226 | | $ | 10,074 | | $ | 415,404 | |
| Scott Buckhout Former President and Chief Executive Officer (9) | 2022 | $ | 56,077 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 1,747,436 | | $ | 1,803,513 | |
| 2021 | $ | 805,385 | | $ | — | | $ | 3,410,115 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 14,001 | | $ | 4,229,501 | |
| 2020 | $ | 754,017 | | $ | 405,586 | | $ | 2,193,689 | | $ | — | | $ | 246,164 | | $ | 3,582 | | $ | 3,603,038 | |
| Amit Goel Former Vice President, Finance, Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer (10) | 2022 | $ | 263,077 | | $ | 202,000 | | $ | 164,691 | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | 66,326 | | $ | 696,094 | |
| | | | | |
| (1) | 2022 Salary figures include stipends paid in the amount of (1) $143,077 for Mr. Najjar in connection with his tenure as Interim Chief Executive Officer between January 19, 2022 and August 10, 2022 and (2) $74,250 for Mr. Sharma in connection with his tenure as Interim Chief Financial Officer between January 1, 2022 and August 10, 2022. |
| (2) | As set forth in the table below, 2022 Bonus figures include the portion of the 2022 STI Plan awards attributable to the Compensation Committee’s decision to adjust the performance measures used to determine plan funding as discussed above in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—2022 Short-Term Incentive Plan Results,” whether received in cash or restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The number of RSUs purchased by each NEO, if any, is set forth in Note 4 below. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | Year | Retention
Bonus | Bonus Attributable to Adjustment to 2022 STI Plan Performance Measure | Total Bonus
Reported | |
| Tony Najjar | 2022 | $40,000 | $118,097 | $158,097 | |
| 2021 | $— | $— | $— | |
| 2020 | $— | $79,356 | $79,356 | |
| Arjun Sharma | 2022 | $169,000 | $83,058 | $252,058 | |
| 2021 | $— | $— | $— | |
| 2020 | $— | $100,813 | $100,813 | |
| Jessica Wenzell | 2022 | $178,000 | $62,380 | $240,380 | |
| 2021 | $— | $— | $— | |
| Forrest Tiedeman | 2022 | $57,500 | $16,180 | $73,680 | |
| Scott Buckhout | 2022 | $— | $— | $— | |
| 2021 | $— | $— | $— | |
| 2020 | $— | $405,586 | $405,586 | |
| Amit Goel | 2022 | $202,000 | $— | $202,000 | |
| | | | | |
| (3) | Reflects the grant date fair value of PSUs and time-based restricted stock units (“Time RSUs”), including MSPP RSUs attributable to the 33% discount on restricted stock units purchased under our Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP) in 2022 in connection with our 2021 STI Plan. For more details about these grants, please refer to the section below entitled “2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards.” A discussion of the assumptions used in calculating the amounts in this column may be found in Note 13 (“Share-Based Compensation”) to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
| (4) | Reflects the amounts earned under our STI Plan by each NEO, whether received in cash or RSUs. Some of our NEOs elected to use all or a portion of their short-term incentive to purchase RSUs under our MSPP. The number of RSUs purchased by each NEO is as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | Year | Percentage of Bonus Used to Purchase RSUs | Amount of Bonus Excluding Retention Bonus | Amount of Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Amount of Bonus Plus Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation | Amount of Bonus and
Non-Equity Incentive Compensation Used to Purchase RSUs | Number of RSUs Purchased |
| Tony Najjar | 2022 | 30% | $ | 118,097 | | $ | 358,987 | | $ | 477,084 | | $ | 143,125 | | [TBD] |
| 2021 | 30% | $ | — | | $ | 90,057 | | $ | 90,057 | | $ | 27,017 | | 2,040 |
| 2020 | 30% | $ | 79,356 | | $ | 128,544 | | $ | 207,900 | | $ | 62,370 | | 2,337 |
| Arjun Sharma | 2022 | 100% | $ | 83,058 | | $ | 262,965 | | $ | 346,023 | | $ | 346,023 | | [TBD] |
| 2021 | 100% | $ | — | | $ | 69,505 | | $ | 69,505 | | $ | 69,505 | | 5,249 |
| 2020 | 100% | $ | 100,813 | | $ | 61,187 | | $ | 162,000 | | $ | 162,000 | | 6,072 |
| Jessica Wenzell | 2022 | 10% | $ | 62,380 | | $ | 197,497 | | $ | 259,877 | | $ | 25,988 | | [TBD] |
| 2021 | —% | $ | — | | $ | 73,064 | | $ | 73,064 | | $ | — | | 0 |
| Forrest Tiedeman | 2022 | —% | $ | 16,180 | | $ | 51,226 | | $ | 67,406 | | $ | — | | 0 |
| Scott Buckhout | 2022 | 70% | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | 0 |
| 2021 | 70% | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | 0 |
| 2020 | 70% | $ | 405,586 | | $ | 246,164 | | $ | 651,750 | | $ | 456,225 | | 17,100 |
| Amit Goel | 2022 | —% | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | 0 |
| | | | | |
| Under our MSPP, the purchase price for RSUs is 67% of the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. The grant date fair value of the portion of MSPP RSUs attributable to the 33% discount have been included under the Stock Awards column as additional compensation to NEOs. The total number of RSUs to be purchased in connection with the 2022 STI Plan will be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the bonus indicated in the above table by 67% of the closing price of our Common Stock on the grant date, scheduled to occur following the filing of this 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K. For the 2021 STI Plan, the total number of RSUs purchased was determined by dividing the dollar amount of the bonus indicated in the above table by $13.24, which is 67% of the closing price of our Common Stock on August 15, 2022. For the 2020 STI Plan, the total number of RSUs purchased was determined by dividing the dollar amount of the bonus indicated in the above table by $26.68, which is 67% of the closing price of our Common Stock on March 16, 2021. The actual number of RSUs purchased under the MSPP may be reduced to pay for tax withholding. Although Mr. Buckhout elected to participate in the MSPP with respect to the 2021 and 2022 STI payouts, no MSPP award was granted since he did not receive a 2021 or 2022 STI payment. |
| (5) | See “2022 All Other Compensation Table” for specific items in this category. |
| (6) | Mr. Najjar was named President and Chief Executive Officer effective August 10, 2022; previously, he served as Chief Operating Officer and Interim President and Chief Executive Officer with effect from January 19, 2022 and served in the role of President, Aerospace and Defense Group prior to January 19, 2022. |
| (7) | Mr. Sharma was named Chief Financial Officer effective August 10, 2022; previously, he served as our interim Chief Financial Officer with effect from January 1, 2022 and continues to serve as our Senior Vice President, Business Development. |
| (8) | Mr. Tiedeman was appointed as our Vice President of Treasury effective October 1, 2022 and continues to serve as our Vice President of Tax. |
| (9) | Mr. Buckhout terminated employment with CIRCOR on January 19, 2022. |
| (10) | Mr. Goel terminated employment with CIRCOR on September 9, 2022. The equity awards granted to Mr. Goel in 2022 and disclosed in column (e) of the Summary Compensation Table were forfeited |
2022 All Other Compensation Table
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits (1) | Tax Preparation and Financial Planning | Life Insurance Premiums (2) | Payments Relating to Employee Savings Plan (3) | Other (4) | Total |
| Tony Najjar | $296 | $2,448 | $672 | $12,200 | $— | $15,616 |
| Arjun Sharma | $8,696 | $1,013 | $672 | $12,200 | $— | $22,581 |
| Jessica Wenzell | $296 | $— | $672 | $12,200 | $— | $13,168 |
| Forrest Tiedeman | $178 | $— | $437 | $9,459 | $— | $10,074 |
| Scott Buckhout | $25 | $— | $56 | $2,243 | $1,745,112 | $1,747,436 |
| Amit Goel | $296 | $— | $672 | $10,595 | $54,762 | $66,325 |
| | | | | |
| (1) | The amounts shown in this column reflect, as applicable, the cost of group disability insurance that provides for higher coverage levels than generally available to other employees, plus, in the case of Mr. Sharma, his annual car allowance of $8,400. |
| (2) | The amounts shown in this column reflect group term life insurance premiums paid on behalf of each NEO. |
| (3) | The amounts shown in this column reflect Company matching contributions earned in 2022 with respect to each NEO’s 401(k) account of up to 4.0% of eligible compensation, subject to the limits imposed by IRS regulations. |
| (4) | For Mr. Buckhout, the amount shown in this column reflects severance in the amount of $1,701,000, subsidized COBRA payments in the amount of $23,737, and $20,375 for accrued vacation. For Mr. Goel, the amount includes consulting fees paid to Mr. Goel following his termination of employment in the amount of $25,800 and $27,158 for accrued vacation. |
2022 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table summarizes the grant of plan-based awards made to our NEOs in 2022.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name | Type of
Award (1) | Grant
Date | Approval Date | Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (2) | Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards (3) | All Other Stock
Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units
(#) | Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock and Option Awards ($) (4) (5) |
Thresh-hold
($) | Target
($) | Maxi-mum
($) | Thresh-hold
(#) | Target
(#) | Maxi-mum
(#) |
| (a) | | (b) | | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (l) |
| Tony Najjar | STI | | | 194,882 | 389,764 | 1,169,292 | — | — | — | — | — |
| PSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | 6,953 | 13,905 | 27,810 | — | 216,501 |
| Time RSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13,905 | 274,485 |
| Special RSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 13,905 | 274,485 |
| MSPP RSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 673 | 13,285 |
| Arjun Sharma | STI | | | 162,175 | 324,350 | 973,050 | — | — | — | — | — |
| PSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | 5,562 | 11,124 | 22,248 | — | 173,201 |
| Time RSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11,124 | 219,588 |
| MSPP RSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1,732 | 34,190 |
| Jessica Wenzell | STI | | | 121,800 | 243,600 | 730,800 | — | — | — | — | — |
| PSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | 5,215 | 10,429 | 20,858 | — | 162,380 |
| Time RSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10,431 | 205,908 |
| Forrest Tiedeman | STI | | | 31,592 | 63,184 | 189,552 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Time RSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2,226 | 43,941 |
| Scott Buckhout | STI | — | — | 445,500 | 891,000 | 2,673,000 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Amit Goel | STI | | | 84,240 | 168,480 | 505,440 | — | — | — | — | — |
| Time RSU | 8/15/2022 | 8/8/2022 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8,343 | 164,691 |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Type of Award: |
| "STI" refers to cash awards that are subject to performance conditions under the STI Plan |
| "PSU" refers to RSU awards that are subject to performance conditions |
| "Time RSU" refers to RSU awards that are subject to time-based vesting only |
| "Special RSU" refers to Mr. Najjar's award issued in connection with his service as Interim Chief Executive Officer, which is scheduled to vest on the one-year anniversary of the award date or earlier in the event of termination of employment without cause. |
| "MSPP RSU" refers to the portion of Time RSU awards granted under our Management Stock Purchase Plan (MSPP) that are attributable to the 33% discounted purchase price. Messrs. Najjar and Sharma elected to use a portion of the short-term incentive bonus awarded under our 2021 STI Plan to purchase Time RSUs at a price equal to 67% of the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant. See footnote (3) to the “Summary Compensation Table” for a description of the actual amount of annual bonus earned by each of the NEOs, the corresponding amount of each NEO’s bonus that was used to purchase RSUs and the total number of RSUs purchased. |
| The Time RSU, PSU, and MSPP RSU awards were granted under our LTI Plan. See Summary Compensation Table and the footnotes thereto for additional information on these types of awards. |
| (2) | The amounts in these columns indicate the threshold, target and maximum performance bonus amounts payable under our STI Plan prior to deducting any amounts the NEO elected to use to purchase RSUs under the MSPP. The potential bonus amounts payable under the STI Plan are based on the achievement of specific financial performance metrics. The NEOs would receive a bonus payout equal to 50% of their target bonus at the threshold level of performance and 300% of their target bonus at the maximum level of performance. If none of the threshold performance metrics are met, no bonus would be payable to the NEOs under the STI Plan unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee. |
| (3) | The amounts in these columns indicate the threshold, target and maximum number of shares that the NEO could receive if an award payout is achieved under the PSUs. These potential share amounts are based on achievement of relative total shareholder return goals compared to a specified index of small-sized industrial companies during the performance period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on February 28, 2025. The NEO would receive 50% of the target number of shares at the threshold level of performance and 200% of the target number of shares at the maximum level of performance. If the threshold performance target is not met, then our NEOs will not receive any shares. |
| (4) | The amounts in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair values of the PSUs reflected in column (g) and Time RSUs, Special RSUs and MSPP RSUs reflected in column (i), each calculated in accordance with accounting guidance. |
| (5) | Included in this column is the grant date fair value of the target number of PSUs granted to each NEO, which we consider to be the probable outcome of the performance conditions as of the grant date. The following table shows for each NEO the grant date fair value of the target number of PSUs granted to each such officer that is included in the Summary Compensation Table and the grant date fair value of the maximum number of PSUs. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NEO | Target Number of PSUs | Grant Date Fair Value of Target Number of PSUs | Maximum Number of PSUs | Grant Date Fair Value of Maximum Number of PSUs |
| Tony Najjar | 13,905 | $216,501 | 27,810 | $433,002 |
| Arjun Sharma | 11,124 | $173,201 | 22,248 | $346,401 |
| Jessica Wenzell | 10,429 | $162,380 | 20,858 | $324,759 |
| Forrest Tiedeman | — | $— | — | $— |
| Scott Buckhout | — | $— | — | $— |
| Amit Goel | — | $— | — | $— |
| | | |
| The target number of PSUs awarded in 2022 is earned if our relative total shareholder return goals are achieved during the performance period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on February 28, 2025. The maximum number of PSUs that can be earned is two times the target number of PSUs. See “Long Term Equity Incentives” in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” for more details. |
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| Name | Type of Award (1) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#)(2) | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) (2) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying unexercised unearned options (#) | Option Exercise Price ($) | Option Expiration Date | Award Grant Date | Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (3) | Equity Incentive Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (3) |
| (a) | | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) | (f) | (g) | (h) | (i) | (j) | (k) |
| Tony Najjar | Option | 2,730 | — | — | $38.89 | 2/23/2023 | 2/23/2016 | — | — | — | — |
| Option | 1,449 | — | — | $60.99 | 2/27/2024 | 2/27/2017 | — | — | — | — |
| Option | 1,704 | — | — | $42.62 | 3/05/2025 | 3/05/2018 | — | — | — | — |
| Option | 4,224 | — | — | $33.63 | 3/04/2026 | 3/04/2019 | — | — | — | — |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/27/2020 | 2,802 | $67,136 (4) | — | — |
| MSPP RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/17/2021 | 2,337 | $55,995 (5) | — | — |
| PSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/17/2021 | — | — | 2,692 | $64,500 (6) |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/17/2021 | 3,590 | $86,016 (4) | — | — |
| MSPP RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | 2,040 | $48,878 (5) | — | — |
| PSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | — | — | 13,905 | $333,164 (7) |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | 13,905 | $333,164 (8) | — | — |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | 13,905 | $333,164 (9) | — | — |
| Arjun Sharma | Option | 8,406 | — | — | $38.89 | 2/23/2023 | 2/23/2016 | — | — | — | — |
| Option | 5,943 | — | — | $60.99 | 2/27/2024 | 2/27/2017 | — | — | — | — |
| Option | 2,760 | — | — | $42.62 | 3/05/2025 | 3/05/2018 | — | — | — | — |
| Option | 5,280 | | — | $33.63 | 3/04/2026 | 3/04/2019 | — | — | — | — |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/27/2020 | 3,203 | $76,744 (4) | — | — |
| MSPP RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/17/2021 | 6,072 | $145,485 (5) | — | — |
| PSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/17/2021 | — | — | 2,692 | $64,500 (6) |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/17/2021 | 3,590 | $86,016 (4) | — | — |
| MSPP RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | 5,249 | $125,766 (5) | — | — |
| PSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | — | — | 11,124 | $266,531 (7) |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | 11,124 | $266,531 (8) | — | — |
| Jessica Wenzell | Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 11/9/2020 | 579 | $13,873 (4) | — | — |
| PSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/17/2021 | — | — | 1,683 | $40,313 (6) |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 3/17/2021 | 2,244 | $53,766 (4) | — | — |
| PSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | — | — | 10,429 | $249,879 (7) |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | 10,431 | $249,927 (8) | — | — |
| Forrest Tiedeman | Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/12/2021 | 662 | $15,862 (4) | — | — |
| Time RSU | — | — | — | — | — | 8/15/2022 | 2,226 | $53,335 (8) | — | — |
| Scott Buckhout (10) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Amit Goel (10) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| | | | | |
| (1) | Type of Award: |
| "Time RSU" refers to RSU awards that are subject to time-based vesting only |
| "PSU" refers to RSU awards that are subject to performance conditions |
| "Option" refers to stock option awards that are subject to time-based vesting |
| "MSPP RSU" refers to RSU awards subject to time-based vesting pursuant to our Management Stock Purchase Plan |
| Each of these awards was granted under our 2014 or 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plans. |
| (2) | The Options listed in these columns were granted pursuant to our 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and vest ratably 33% per year generally beginning on the first anniversary from such date and have a seven-year term. |
| (3) | The amounts shown in these columns reflect the market value of unvested RSUs calculated by multiplying the number of such unvested RSUs by $23.96, the closing price of our Common Stock on December 30, 2022. |
| | | | | |
| (4) | The amounts reflect the unvested portion of long-term incentive grants in the form of Time RSUs pursuant to our 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and generally vest ratably over a three-year period, beginning on the first anniversary of the date of grant. |
| (5) | The amounts reflect the unvested portion of MSPP RSUs pursuant to the MSPP provisions allowing executives to receive RSUs in lieu of a specified percentage or dollar amount of their short-term incentive cash bonus. Such MSPP RSUs vest in whole on the date that is three years from the date of the grant, provided that the NEO is then employed with the Company, at which time they convert into shares of Common Stock and are issued to the executive unless the executive has selected a longer deferral period. For example, awards with a grant date of March 17, 2021 vest on March 17, 2024. To the extent that an executive does not earn a vested benefit when terminating employment before the scheduled vesting date, the unvested MSPP RSUs are cancelled and the Company returns the corresponding annual incentive cash bonus used to purchase those MSPP RSUs plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. If all of the unvested MSPP RSUs disclosed in the table above were cancelled on December 31, 2022 due to an NEO’s voluntary resignation, the amount that would be required to be returned to each NEO is as follows: Mr. Najjar $83,305; and Mr. Sharma $215,755. In the event of retirement, disability or an involuntary termination for any reason prior to the third anniversary of the grant date, the NEO vests in a pro-rata amount of the MSPP RSUs based on number of full years that the NEO was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three, and the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of the corresponding bonus with interest. See the tables for each NEO under the heading “Severance and Other Benefits Upon Termination of Employment or Change of Control” for an estimate of these amounts. |
| (6) | The amounts reflect the unvested portion of long-term incentive grants in the form of PSUs pursuant to our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan in connection with the 2021 PSU award. Such grants are subject to relative total shareholder return conditions during the performance period beginning on February 26, 2021 and ending on February 29, 2024 and reflect the threshold amount of the award (one-half of target award). |
| (7) | The amounts reflect the unvested portion of long-term incentive grants in the form of PSUs pursuant to our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan in connection with the 2022 PSU award. Such grants are subject to relative total shareholder return conditions during the performance period beginning on March 1, 2022 and ending on February 28, 2025 and reflect the target amount of the award. |
| (8) | The amounts reflect the unvested portion of long-term incentive grants in the form of Time RSUs pursuant to our 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan and vest one-third on August 15, 2023, one-third on March 15, 2024, and one-third on March 15, 2025. |
| (9) | The amounts reflect the unvested portion of Mr. Najjar's special long-term incentive grant in the form of Time RSUs pursuant to our 2019 Equity Incentive Plan and awarded in connection with Mr. Najjar's assignment as Interim Chief Executive Officer. This grant is scheduled to vest on the one-year anniversary of the grant date. |
| (10) | Messrs. Buckhout and Goel terminated employment in 2022 and had no outstanding awards as of December 31, 2022. |
2022 Options Exercises and Stock Vested
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Option Awards | Stock Awards |
| Name | Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#) | Value Realized
on
Exercise ($) | Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)(1) | Value Realized
on
Vesting ($)(2) |
| (a) | (b) | (c) | (d) | (e) |
| Tony Najjar(3) | — | — | 10,276 | $267,025 |
| Arjun Sharma(4) | — | — | 12,230 | $318,189 |
| Jessica Wenzell(5) | — | — | 1,701 | $38,819 |
| Forrest Tiedeman(6) | — | — | 331 | $5,783 |
| Scott Buckhout(7) | — | — | 48,593 | $1,143,078 |
| Amit Goel(8) | — | — | 1,346 | $32,142 |
| | | | | |
| (1) | With respect to shares acquired upon vesting of RSUs, NEOs have shares withheld to pay associated income taxes. The number of shares reported represents the gross number prior to withholding of such shares. In certain cases, the actual receipt of shares underlying vested RSUs may have been deferred pursuant to a previous election made by the NEO. This table reports the number of shares vested regardless of whether distribution actually was made. |
| (2) | The amounts shown in this column reflect the value realized upon vesting of Time RSUs, PSUs, and MSPP RSUs determined by multiplying the number of share units that vested (prior to withholding of any shares to pay associated income taxes) and the closing price of our Common Stock on the day prior to vesting, or, in the case of vestings triggered by termination of employment, the closing price on the day of vesting. The amounts reported include the value of MSPP RSUs that were purchased with the following Short-Term Incentive award amounts earned prior to 2022: $116,792 for Mr. Najjar, $149,022 for Mr. Sharma, and $439,076 for Mr. Buckhout. |
| (3) | Mr. Najjar had 5,183 MSPP RSUs and 496 RSUs vest on March 4, 2022 with a price of $25.78, 2,802 RSUs vest on March 27, 2022 with a price of $27.75, and 1,795 RSUs vest on April 17, 2022 with a price of $23.88. |
| (4) | Mr. Sharma had 6,612 MSPP RSUs and 620 RSUs vest on March 4, 2022 with a price of $25.78, 3,203 RSUs vest on March 27, 2022 with a price of $27.75, and 1,795 RSUs vest on April 17, 2022 with a price of $23.88. |
| (5) | Ms. Wenzell had 1,122 RSUs vest on April 17, 2022 with a price of $23.88 and 579 RSUs vest on November 9, 2022 with a price of $20.77. |
| (6) | Mr. Tiedeman had 331 RSUs vest on September 12, 2022 with a price of $17.47. |
| (7) | Mr. Buckhout had 12,991 MSPP RSUs and 35,602 RSUs vest on January 19, 2022 with a price of $23.67. |
| (8) | Mr. Goel had 1,346 RSUs vest on April 17, 2022 with a price of $23.88. |
2022 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation
The Company sponsors a nonqualified deferred compensation plan (the "nonqualified 401(k) excess plan") to provide benefits that would have otherwise been provided to participants in our 401(k) plan but for the imposition of certain maximum statutory limits imposed on qualified plans, such as annual limits on eligible pay and contributions. The Company also may, in its discretion, make the company contributions to the plan but only with respect to compensation in excess of the annual limit of eligible pay. In 2022, the Company elected not to make company contributions to the nonqualified 401(k) excess plan. Contributions made to the nonqualified 401(k) excess plan are invested in a rabbi trust, at the discretion of the plan participants, in one or more mutual funds selected by the plan participants.
The same mutual funds that we make available under our 401(k) plan are also available under the nonqualified 401(k) excess plan and there are no minimum or guaranteed rates of return to the participants on such investments. Distributions from the plan are made in lump sum, in the case of an in-service distribution, or lump sum or annual installments, as elected by participants, in connection with a participant’s separation from service.
As discussed above, our MSPP allows our NEOs to defer the payment of their short-term incentive compensation in the form of RSUs for a deferral period of three years. In general, if the grantee’s employment terminates before the end of the deferral period for reasons other than retirement, the MSPP RSUs will be settled in shares of our common stock upon termination of employment. If the grantee retires before the end of the deferral period, the MSPP RSUs will be settled in shares of our common stock at the end of the deferral period. During the deferral period, any dividends that would otherwise be paid on the deferred MSPP RSUs accumulate in cash and will be paid out at the same time that the deferred MSPP RSUs are settled. Information regarding short-term incentive compensation that was used to purchase MSPP RSUs is set forth in the Outstanding Equity Awards at 2022 Fiscal Year-End Table.
Under either deferred compensation arrangement, if a distribution is made on account of separation from service, the distribution will be delayed by six months if the participant is considered a specified employee within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
The following table outlines employee and employer contributions to the nonqualified 401(k) excess plan for Fiscal Year 2022. The table also includes earnings or losses during Fiscal Year 2022, and the year-end balances as of December 31, 2022.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Name (a) | Item | Executive
Contributions
in Last FY (1)
(b) | Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
(c) | Aggregate
Earnings/(Loss) in
Last FY (2)
(d) | Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
(e) | Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE (3)
(f) |
| Tony Najjar | Excess 401K | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— |
| Arjun Sharma | Excess 401K | $— | $— | $(25,350) | $— | $70,690 |
| Jessica Wenzell | Excess 401K | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— |
| Forrest Tiedeman | Excess 401K | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— |
| Scott Buckhout | Excess 401K | $11,215 | $— | $(40,121) | $221,141 | $— |
| Amit Goel | Excess 401K | $— | $— | $— | $— | $— |
| | | | | |
| (1) | These amounts are included in 2022 salary as reported in the Summary Compensation Table. |
| (2) | These amounts are excluded from the Summary Compensation Table. |
| (3) | For Mr. Sharma, this figure includes $50,123 that has been reported in the Summary Compensation Tables of prior year Proxy Statements. |
SEVERANCE AND OTHER BENEFITS UPON
TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT OR CHANGE IN CONTROL
To achieve our compensation objective of attracting, retaining and motivating qualified executives, we believe that we need to provide our executive officers with severance and change in control protections that are competitive with the protections offered by our Peer Group Companies. Offering our executive officers these payments and benefits facilitates the operation of our business, allows them to better focus their time, attention and capabilities on our business, assists us in recruiting and motivating executive officers, provides for a clear and consistent approach to managing involuntary departures with mutually understood separation benefits and aligns with market practice. The following section describes our severance and change in control agreements for our NEOs employed with us at year-end along with estimated payments if their employment had terminated with us as of December 31, 2022. With regard to NEOs who departed during 2022, the summary below sets forth the actual amounts that they received in connection termination of employment. Other benefits that our NEOs would be entitled to irrespective of termination of employment or change in control, such as previously vested equity awards and non-qualified deferred compensation, are described above.
Severance Agreements
Certain of our NEOs have entered into an agreement providing severance benefits if he or she resigns from the Company for good reason or if the Company terminates him or her other than for cause (the “Severance Agreements”). Messrs. Najjar, Sharma, Buckhout and Ms. Wenzell each are (or were in the case of terminated NEOs) party to such a Severance Agreement (collectively referred to as "participating" NEO's in this section). In such circumstances, Mr. Buckhout’s Severance Agreement entitled him to a lump sum payment equal to (i) his then-current base salary and (ii) his target short-term incentive compensation in effect during the fiscal year in which the termination occurs. In the same circumstances, each of Messrs. Najjar’s and Sharma’s and Ms. Wenzell's Severance Agreement entitles him or her to a lump sum payment equal to his or her then-current base salary and short-term incentive compensation for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs, to the extent that performance goals are met for that year, prorated based on the date of termination of employment. In addition, for each participating NEO, the Severance Agreements provide that the Company will continue to subsidize the cost for medical coverage (if COBRA coverage is elected) in the same proportion it did on the date of termination for up to 12 months following termination.
To receive the benefits described above, each such participating NEO must execute a general release of claims in a manner satisfactory to the Company within 21 days of the termination of employment. Each of the participating NEOs listed in the above paragraph also has agreed to comply with non-competition and non-solicitation obligations lasting for the term of employment and one year following termination as consideration for the severance benefits.
The Severance Agreements continue to apply after a change in control. No benefits, however, are payable under the Severance Agreements if severance benefits become payable under the Change in Control Agreements, as described below.
In addition to the Severance Agreements, the company also entered into a special agreement with Mr. Buckhout in connection with his termination of employment ("Special Termination Agreement"). Mr. Buckhout's Special Termination Agreement, entered into between the parties on January 28, 2022 in connection with his termination of employment on January 19, 2022, is substantially the same as Mr. Buckhout's Severance Agreement described above except that it provides for acceleration of vesting (but not the timing of payment) of his two RSU vesting tranches that were otherwise scheduled to vest in March and April of 2022 (a combined total of 35,602 RSUs). Mr. Buckhout's Special Termination Agreement also confirmed his eligibility to participate in the 2021 STI Plan (payment amount was $0) and the PSU vesting on December 31, 2021 pursuant to his 2019 PSU award (zero shares vested due to performance results). All other outstanding equity awards, deferred compensation benefits and earned but unused vacation balances were settled in accordance with the underlying terms of the applicable award agreements and plan documents.
Severance Plan
Those of our NEOs that are not otherwise covered under an individual Severance Agreement are eligible for severance benefits pursuant to the Company's severance policy. Mr. Tiedeman is eligible, and Mr. Goal was eligible before his termination of employment, to receive severance in an amount equal to six-months of salary in connection with a termination by the Company due to a work force reduction or job elimination or in connection with a decision to participate in an exit incentive program offered by the Company. Participants must agree to a release of claims against the Company as a condition to receiving any such severance benefits. All other outstanding equity awards, deferred compensation benefits and earned but unused vacation balances would be settled in accordance with the underlying terms of the applicable award agreements and plan documents.
Change in Control Agreements
Certain of our NEOs have entered into an agreement providing benefits in the event of a change in control of the Company (the “Change in Control Agreements”). Messrs. Najjar, Sharma, Buckhout and Goel and Ms. Wenzell each are (or were in the case of terminated NEOs) party to such a Change in Control Agreement (collectively referred to as "participating" NEO's in this section). The term of each Change in Control Agreement is one year subject to annual one-year extensions unless there is a notice of non-renewal. Each of the Change in Control Agreements provides enhanced severance benefits if, within two years following a change of control, such participating NEO's employment is terminated by the Company without cause or he or she resigns from the Company for good reason. In such circumstances, the Change in Control Agreement entitles each such NEO to a lump sum payment equal to two times (i) the greater of his or her (a) then-current base salary, (b) salary immediately prior to the change in control or (c) salary immediately prior to the announcement of the change in control if such announcement occurs in a different year than the change in control and (ii) the greater of (a) his or her target annual bonus in effect during the fiscal year in which the termination occurs and (b) the average annual bonuses paid or payable for the three fiscal years ended prior to termination of employment or, if greater, the three fiscal years ended prior to the change in control (or, in each case, a lesser period for which annual bonuses were payable). Such payment is payable on the first payroll date after a release of claims becomes irrevocable, subject to a later payment date of up to six months and one-day following termination of employment, in the event required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Change in Control Agreements also provide for (i) a pro-rated payment of annual bonus for the performance year in which termination of employment occurs based on actual performance through such termination date and payable at the same time as bonuses are paid to other senior executives, (ii) payments equal to the value of up to 24 months of COBRA premiums (if COBRA coverage is elected) to facilitate continuation of medical coverage, with the first 18 months payable in monthly installments and the remaining six months, if applicable, paid in a lump sum following the 18-month anniversary of termination of employment if COBRA coverage were maintained for the full 18 months and (iii) the accelerated vesting of certain equity-based awards in connection with a termination of employment without cause or for good reason (a “qualifying termination”) as further detailed below.
The treatment of equity awards are governed by the Change in Control Agreements as follows:
•For equity awards that are subject only to service conditions, awards will vest upon a change in control only in the event the surviving entity does not assume or continue the awards or provide substitute awards of similar value. If such awards are assumed or substituted and a qualifying termination of employment subsequently occurs within two years of the change in control event, any unvested portion of such awards will immediately vest.
•For equity awards that are subject to achievement of performance criteria, if the change in control event is also a “change in the ownership of a corporation” or a “change in the ownership of a substantial portion of a corporation's assets” (as set forth in Treas.Reg. 1.409A-3(i)(5)), then any such award (i) will, to the extent not otherwise subject to substantial risk of forfeiture, immediately vest on a pro-rated basis based on the greater of (a) the target number of shares underlying the award or (b) the number of shares determined based on actual performance between the beginning of the performance period and the event date) or (ii) if such award is otherwise subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, it may be replaced with a substitute award of restricted stock of the successor entity of equal value to the target number of performance shares (or, if greater, the number of shares determined based on actual performance between the beginning of the performance period and change in control date) with vesting to occur on the second anniversary of the change in control if the change in control occurs within the first 12 months of the applicable performance period or on the first anniversary of the change in control date if the change in control occurs after the first 12 months of the applicable performance period, or, if earlier, immediate vesting upon a qualifying termination of employment.
A “change in control” for purposes of the Change in Control Agreements means any of the following: (i) acquisition of 50% or more of the voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities; (ii) consummation of a consolidation or merger of the Company that results in stockholders owning less than 50% voting shares of the consolidated or merge entity (or its ultimate parent corporation, if any), (iii) stockholders of the Company approve a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or there is consummation of a sale or similar transaction of substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (iv) failure of incumbent directors for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board. In each case above, such event must also constitute a change in ownership or effective control of the Company, or a change in the ownership of a substantial portion of the assets of the Company, within the meaning of Section 409A(a)(2)(A)(v) of the Internal Revenue Code and U.S. Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(5).
As noted above, the participating NEOs would not be entitled to benefits under the Severance Agreements in connection with any termination from the Company with respect to which benefits under the Change in Control Agreements would be payable. Each of the participating NEOs listed above also has agreed to comply with non-competition and non-solicitation provisions lasting for the term of employment and one year following termination as consideration for the change in control benefits.
Change In Control Severance Pay Plan
Those of our NEOs that are not otherwise covered under an individual Change in Control Agreement are eligible for enhanced severance benefits in the event of a qualifying termination following a change in control pursuant to the Company's Change in Control Severance Pay Plan ("CIC Severance Plan"). Mr. Tiedeman is eligible for coverage under this plan. The CIC Severance Plan provides benefits if, within one year following a change in control, a participant is terminated by the Company without cause or he or she resigns from the Company for good reason, in either case within the twelve-month period following a Change in Control (a “Qualifying Termination”). In such circumstances, the plan provides, in the case of Mr. Tiedeman, payments equal to:
•the sum of (x) 100% of annual salary at the rate in effect on the date of a Qualifying Termination (or, if greater, at the rate in effect immediately before the Change in Control) and (y) 100% of target bonus for the then current calendar year in which such Qualifying Termination occurs, or if such target bonus amount has not yet been established for such year, 100% of the target bonus amount for the calendar year immediately prior to the calendar year in which the Qualifying Termination occurs, plus
•a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (x) any bonus amount that had been awarded for a completed calendar year but not yet paid as of the date of a Qualifying Termination and (y) with respect to the calendar year during which a Qualifying Termination occurs, an amount equal to the product of (i) the target bonus for such year, or if such target amount has not yet been established for such year, the target bonus amount for the calendar year immediately prior to the calendar year in which the Qualifying Termination occurs, and (ii) a fraction, the numerator of which equals the number of days from and including the first day of the calendar year during which the Qualifying Termination occurred through and including the date of Qualifying Termination, and the denominator of which is 365, plus
•a monthly payment during a period of up to 12 months (or such shorter period if coverage commences under a subsequent employer's health care plan) equal to the COBRA premium for the covered employee’s level of coverage in effect at the time of a Qualifying Termination under the Company's group health plans but reduced by the monthly amount that the employee would pay for such coverage if they were an active employee, plus
•the vesting of any outstanding equity awards that vest solely on the basis of continued employment with the Company shall be accelerated solely by reason of a Change in Control only if the surviving corporation or acquiring corporation following a Change in Control refuses to assume or continue these awards or to substitute similar equity awards for those outstanding immediately prior to the Change in Control. If such equity awards are so continued, assumed or substituted and the employee incurs a Qualifying Termination within the twelve month period following the Change in Control, then the vesting and exercisability of all such unvested equity awards will be accelerated in full.
Such payments are generally payable on the first regular payroll cycle following the one-month anniversary of the Qualifying Termination (or, if later, in the first regular payroll cycle after a release of claims becomes irrevocable, or if applicable with respect to a performance bonus payment amount that has yet to be determined, the date on which such bonus payments are regularly scheduled, and in each case subject to a later payment date of up to six months and one-day following termination of employment, in the event required by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
A “change in control” for purposes of the CIC Severance Plan means any of the following:
(i) acquisition of securities of the Company representing more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities, provided, however, that no Change in Control will be deemed to have occurred as a result of a change in ownership percentage resulting solely from an acquisition of securities by the Company or a transaction described in clause (a) of paragraph (ii) below; or
(ii) there is consummated a merger of the Company with any other business entity, other than (a) a merger which would result in the securities of the Company generally entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company outstanding immediately prior to such merger continuing to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into such securities of the surviving entity or any parent thereof), in combination with the ownership of any trustee or other fiduciary holding such securities under an employee benefit plan of the Company or any subsidiary at least 50% (fifty percent) of the
combined voting power of the voting securities of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof outstanding immediately after such merger, generally entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company or such surviving entity or any parent thereof and, in the case of such surviving entity or any parent thereof, of a class registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), or (b) a merger effected to implement a recapitalization of the Company (or similar transaction) in which no new Person is or becomes a beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of the Company’s then outstanding voting securities; or
(iii) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company or there is consummated the sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of (1) the Company’s assets on a consolidated basis in one or a series of transactions with one or more parties or (2) either one of the Company’s externally reporting segments, other than a sale or disposition by the Company of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity or entities where the outstanding securities generally entitled to vote in the election of directors of the Company immediately prior to the transaction continue to represent (either by remaining outstanding or by being converted into such securities of the surviving entity or entities or any parent(s) thereof) fifty percent (50%) or more of the combined voting power of the outstanding voting securities of any such entity or entities generally entitled to vote in such entity’s election of directors immediately after such sale and of a class registered under Section 12 of the Act; or
(iv) Incumbent Directors (as defined below) cease for any reason ,to constitute at least a majority of the Board.
Employees receiving benefits under the CIC Severance Plan would not be entitled to benefits under any other severance plan or severance agreements of the Company. Additionally, plan coverage is contingent upon (i) covered employee executing and delivering to the Company a general release of claims following the date of a Qualifying Termination and (ii) covered employee executing and delivering to the Company a restrictive covenants and cooperation agreement, including non-disparagement and non-disclosure agreements, and agreement to non-solicitation of Company employees for a period of twelve (12) months following the termination of employment for any reason.
Illustration of Potential Payments upon Termination of Employment
The following tables list the estimated amounts that Messrs. Najjar, Sharma and Tiedeman and Ms. Wenzell would have become entitled to in the event of a termination from the Company or change in control of the Company had such termination or change in control occurred on December 31, 2022. Assumptions used in preparing these estimates are set forth in the footnotes to each table. These tables do not include amounts that are otherwise earned and vested prior to a termination of employment or a change in control, such as vested stock options or nonqualified deferred compensation, amounts payable under disability or life insurance coverages.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Tony Najjar | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Severance and Other Benefits | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Involuntary Without Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason Within Two Years Following Change in Control | | Involuntary Other Than For Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason at Any Other Time | | Involuntary For Cause or Voluntary Resignation Without Good Reason | | Change in Control Without a Termination of Employment (“Single Trigger”) | | Retirement | | Death or Disability | (13) |
| 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | |
| Cash Severance | $ | 2,327,500 | (1) | $ | 665,000 | (6) | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Pro-Rated Bonus | — | (2) | — | (2) | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Health Benefits | $ | 48,939 | (3) | $ | 16,896 | (7) | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Value of accelerated restricted stock units | $ | 1,386,517 | (4) | $ | 416,468 | (8) | — | (9) | — | (10) | $ | 365,793 | (11) | $ | 1,364,949 | (12) |
| Total Value: | $ | 3,762,956 | | (5) | $ | 1,098,364 | | | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 365,793 | | | $ | 1,364,949 | | |
| | | | | |
| (1) | This amount reflects payment to Mr. Najjar that would equal two times his (i) then-current base salary and (ii) then-effective target short-term incentive compensation. |
| (2) | Payment would equal Mr. Najjar’s then-effective target short-term incentive compensation, to the extent that performance goals were met, prorated based on the date of resignation or termination (no amount is illustrated in this example since the bonus had been earned as of December 31, 2022 as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Bonus and Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns). |
| (3) | This amount reflects payments to Mr. Najjar that would equal the cost of continued health insurance for a period of two years for Mr. Najjar and any covered spouse and dependents. 75% of this amount would be paid in equal monthly installments over the 18-month period following the date of termination with each installment payment conditioned on qualification for coverage under COBRA and the remaining 25% would be paid in a lump sum following the 18-month anniversary of employment termination if healthcare coverage is still in effect under COBRA. |
| (4) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Mr. Najjar would be entitled due to the immediate vesting of all unvested RSUs including MSPP RSUs and the target number of PSUs assuming target performance results using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022. |
| (5) | These amounts do not reflect a 20% excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code that may apply depending upon the facts and circumstances in the event of a change in control. This estimate also does not reflect that payments are subject to being reduced in certain circumstances to avoid this tax. |
| (6) | This amount reflects payment to Mr. Najjar that would equal his then-current base salary |
| (7) | This amount reflects payments to Mr. Najjar that would equal the cost of continued health insurance for a period of one- year for Mr. Najjar and any covered spouse and dependents based on the same cost sharing percentage in effect for the health insurance plans prior to termination of employment. This amount would be divided into monthly installments with each installment payment conditioned on qualification for coverage under COBRA. |
| (8) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Mr. Najjar would be entitled due to the full accelerated vesting of his special RSU award granted in 2022 in connection with his appointment to Interim Chief Executive Officer plus the pro-rata vesting of the MSPP RSUs (based on number of full years that he was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three) using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022, and the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of the corresponding bonus plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. |
| (9) | An executive who voluntarily resigns prior to attaining 55 years of age and completing at least five years of service is entitled to receive a return of short-term incentive cash bonuses used to purchase MSPP RSUs plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. See footnote (5) to the Outstanding Equity Awards table for the amounts that would be returned to Mr. Najjar due to a voluntary resignation on December 31, 2022. In the event of any involuntary termination, regardless of the reason for it, the executive vests in a pro-rata amount of the MSPP RSUs (based on number of full years that the executive was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three), and the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of the corresponding bonus plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. The value of the shares and cash that would be returned to Mr. Najjar upon an involuntary termination on December 31, 2022 would be $83,305. This amount is included in the amount disclosed under “Involuntary Other Than For Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason at Any Other Time” above. |
| (10) | As of December 31, 2022, none of Mr. Najjar's unvested awards were subject to single trigger vesting. |
| (11) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Mr. Najjar would be entitled due to (a) pro-rata vesting of the MSPP RSUs (based on number of full years that the executive was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three) and the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of the corresponding bonus plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate, (b) pro-rata vesting of all other unvested RSUs (based on number of days that the executive was employed by the Company during the vesting period), and (c) pro-rata vesting of all unvested PSUs determined for each award based on number of months that the executive was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by the number of months in the applicable performance period, based on actual performance results and paid on the originally scheduled vesting date. This amount assumes final performance results equal the performance results attained as of December 31, 2022 and is valued using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022. |
| (12) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Mr. Najjar would be entitled due to (a) pro-rata vesting of the MSPP RSUs (based on number of full years that the executive was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three) and the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of the corresponding bonus plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate, (b) the immediate vesting of all other unvested RSUs, and (c) immediate vesting of all unvested PSUs assuming target performance results, in each case using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022. |
| (13) | “Disability” for this purpose means qualifying for receipt of long-term disability benefits under the Company’s long-term disability plan as in effect from time to time. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Arjun Sharma | | | | | | | | | | |
| Severance and Other Benefits | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Involuntary Without Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason Within Two Years Following Change in Control | | Involuntary Other Than For Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason at Any Other Time | | Involuntary For Cause or Voluntary Resignation Without Good Reason | | Change in Control Without a Termination of Employment (“Single Trigger”) | | Death or Disability | (12) |
| 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | |
| Cash Severance | $ | 1,646,700 | (1) | $ | 499,000 | (6) | — | | — | | — | |
| Pro-Rated Bonus | — | (2) | — | (2) | — | | — | | — | |
| Health Benefits | $ | 55,314 | (3) | $ | 24,462 | (7) | — | | — | | — | |
| Value of accelerated restricted stock units | $ | 1,096,074 | (4) | $ | 215,755 | (8) | — | (9) | — | (10) | $ | 1,040,578 | (11) |
| Total Value: | $ | 2,798,088 | | (5) | $ | 739,217 | | | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,040,578 | | |
| | | | | |
| (1) | This amount reflects payment to Mr. Sharma that would equal two times his (i) then-current base salary and (ii) then-effective target short-term incentive compensation. |
| (2) | Payment would equal Mr. Sharma’s then-effective target short-term incentive compensation, to the extent that performance goals were met, prorated based on the date of resignation or termination (no amount is illustrated in this example since the bonus had been earned as of December 31, 2022 as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Bonus” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns). |
| (3) | This amount reflects payments to Mr. Sharma that would equal the cost of continued health insurance for a period of two years for Mr. Sharma and any covered spouse and dependents. 75% of this amount would be paid in equal monthly installments over the 18-month period following the date of termination with each installment payment conditioned on qualification for coverage under COBRA and the remaining 25% would be paid in a lump sum following the 18-month anniversary of employment termination if healthcare coverage is still in effect under COBRA. |
| (4) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Mr. Sharma would be entitled due to the immediate vesting of all unvested RSUs including MSPP RSUs and the target number of PSUs assuming target performance results (including PSUs that had not met the performance threshold to vest as of December 31, 2022 but that remain eligible for future vesting) using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022. |
| (5) | These amounts do not reflect a 20% excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code that may apply depending upon the facts and circumstances in the event of a change of control. This estimate also does not reflect that payments are subject to being reduced in certain circumstances to avoid this tax. |
| (6) | This amount reflects payment to Mr. Sharma that would equal his then-current base salary |
| (7) | This amount reflects payments to Mr. Sharma that would equal the cost of continued health insurance for a period of one year for Mr. Sharma and any covered spouse and dependents based on the same cost sharing percentage in effect for the health insurance plans prior to termination of employment. This amount would be divided into monthly installments with each installment payment conditioned on qualification for coverage under COBRA. |
| (8) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Mr. Sharma would be entitled due to pro-rata vesting of the MSPP RSUs (based on number of full years that he was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three) using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022, and the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of the corresponding bonus plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. |
| (9) | (10) An executive who voluntarily resigns prior to attaining 55 years of age and completing at least five years of service is entitled to receive a return of short-term incentive cash bonuses used to purchase MSPP RSUs plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. See footnote (5) to the Outstanding Equity Awards table for the amounts that would be returned to Mr. Sharma due to a voluntary resignation on December 31, 2022. In the event of any involuntary termination, regardless of the reason for it, the executive vests in a pro-rata amount of the MSPP RSUs (based on number of full years that the executive was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three), and the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of the corresponding bonus plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. The value of the shares and cash that would be returned to Mr. Sharma upon an involuntary termination on December 31, 2022 would be $215,755. This amount is reflected in the amount disclosed under “Involuntary Other Than For Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason at Any Other Time” above. |
| (10) | As of December 31, 2022, none of Mr. Sharma's unvested awards were subject to single trigger vesting. |
| (11) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Mr. Sharma would be entitled due to (a) pro-rata vesting of the MSPP RSUs (based on number of full years that the executive was employed by the Company after the grant date divided by three) and the remaining unvested MSPP RSUs would be cancelled for a return of the corresponding bonus plus interest at the one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate, (b) the immediate vesting of all other unvested RSUs, and (c) immediate vesting of all unvested PSUs assuming target performance results, in each case using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022. |
| (12) | “Disability” for this purpose means qualifying for receipt of long-term disability benefits under the Company’s long-term disability plan as in effect from time to time. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Jessica Wenzell | | | | | | | | | | |
| Severance and Other Benefits | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Involuntary Without Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason Within Two Years Following Change in Control | | Involuntary Other Than For Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason at Any Other Time | | Involuntary For Cause or Voluntary Resignation Without Good Reason | | Change in Control Without a Termination of Employment (“Single Trigger”) | | Death or Disability | (8) |
| 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | |
| Cash Severance | $ | 1,299,200 | (1) | $ | 406,000 | (6) | — | | — | | — | |
| Pro-Rated Bonus | — | (2) | — | (2) | — | | — | | — | |
| Health Benefits | $ | 66,448 | (3) | $ | 25,324 | (7) | — | | — | | — | |
| Value of accelerated restricted stock units | $ | 648,070 | (4) | — | | — | | — | | $ | 648,070 | (4) |
| Total Value: | $ | 2,013,718 | | (5) | $ | 431,324 | | | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 648,070 | | |
| | | | | |
| (1) | This amount reflects payment to Ms. Wenzell that would equal two times her (i) then-current base salary and (ii) then-effective target short-term incentive compensation. |
| (2) | Payment would equal Ms. Wenzell’s then-effective target short-term incentive compensation, to the extent that performance goals were met, prorated based on the date of resignation or termination (no amount is illustrated in this example since the bonus had been earned as of December 31, 2022, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Bonus” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns). |
| (3) | This amount reflects payments to Ms. Wenzell that would equal the cost of continued health insurance for a period of two years for Ms. Wenzell and any covered spouse and dependents. 75% of this amount would be paid in equal monthly installments over the 18-month period following the date of termination with each installment payment conditioned on qualification for coverage under COBRA and the remaining 25% would be paid in a lump sum following the 18-month anniversary of employment termination if healthcare coverage is still in effect under COBRA. |
| (4) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Ms. Wenzell would be entitled due to the immediate vesting of all unvested RSUs using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022. |
| (5) | These amounts do not reflect a 20% excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code that may apply depending upon the facts and circumstances in the event of a change in control. This estimate also does not reflect that payments are subject to being reduced in certain circumstances to avoid this tax. |
| (6) | This amount reflects payment to Ms. Wenzell that would equal her then-current base salary. |
| (7) | This amount reflects payments to Ms. Wenzell that would equal the cost of continued health insurance for a period of one year for Ms. Wenzell and any covered spouse and dependents based on the same cost sharing percentage in effect for the health insurance plans prior to termination of employment. This amount would be divided into monthly installments with each installment payment conditioned on qualification for coverage under COBRA. |
| (8) | “Disability” for this purpose means qualifying for receipt of long-term disability benefits under the Company’s long-term disability plan as in effect from time to time. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Forrest Tiedeman | | | | | | | | | | |
| Severance and Other Benefits | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| Involuntary Without Cause or Voluntary Resignation With Good Reason Within One Year Following Change in Control | | Involuntary Other Than For Cause at Any Other Time | | Involuntary For Cause or Voluntary Resignation | | Change in Control Without a Termination of Employment (“Single Trigger”) | | Death or Disability | (9) |
| 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | | 12/31/2022 | |
| Cash Severance | $ | 338,000 | (1) | $ | 130,000 | (7) | — | | — | | — | |
| Pro-Rated Bonus | — | (2) | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Health Benefits | $ | 8,189 | (3) | — | | — | | — | | — | |
| Accelerated retention award payments | $ | 57,500 | (4) | $ | 43,730 | (8) | — | | — | | — | |
| Value of accelerated restricted stock units | $ | 69,196 | (5) | — | | — | | — | | $ | 69,196 | (5) |
| Total Value: | $ | 472,885 | | (6) | $ | 173,730 | | | — | | $ | — | | | $ | 69,196 | | |
| | | | | |
| (1) | This amount reflects payment to Mr. Tiedeman that would equal one times his (i) then-current base salary and (ii) then-effective target short-term incentive compensation. |
| (2) | Payment would equal Mr. Tiedeman’s then-effective target short-term incentive compensation, prorated based on the date of resignation or termination (no amount is illustrated in this example since the bonus earned as of December 31, 2022 exceeded target, as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table in the “Bonus” and “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” columns). |
| (3) | This amount reflects payments to Mr. Tiedeman that would equal the cost of continued health insurance for a period of one year for Mr. Tiedeman and any covered spouse and dependents based on the same cost sharing percentage in effect for the health insurance plans prior to termination of employment. This amount would be divided into monthly installments with each installment payment conditioned on qualification for coverage under COBRA. |
| (4) | This amount reflects the accelerated retention payment to which Mr. Tiedeman would be entitled if he experienced a qualifying termination of employment in connection with a change in control on December 31, 2022. |
| (5) | This amount reflects the incremental value to which Mr. Tiedeman would be entitled due to the immediate vesting of all unvested RSUs using the closing stock price of $23.96 on December 30, 2022. |
| (6) | These amounts do not reflect a 20% excise tax under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code that may apply depending upon the facts and circumstances in the event of a change in control. This estimate also does not reflect that payments are subject to being reduced in certain circumstances to avoid this tax. |
| (7) | This amount reflects payment to Mr. Tiedeman that would equal 50% of his then-current base salary. |
| (8) | This amount reflects the pro-rated retention payment to which Mr. Tiedeman would be entitled if his employment was terminated by the Company other than for cause on December 31, 2022. |
| (9) | “Disability” for this purpose means qualifying for receipt of long-term disability benefits under the Company’s long-term disability plan as in effect from time to time. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Scott Buckhout | | | | | | | | | |
| Severance and Other Benefits | | | | | | | |
In connection with Mr. Buckhout's termination of employment and as described in Exhibit 10.38 to CIRCOR's 2021 Annual Report on Form 10-K, he received benefits and payments that included: (1) severance in the amount of $1,701,000, (2) subsidized healthcare coverage by way of monthly payments towards COBRA premiums, totaling $23,737 in 2022, (3) cash payment in the amount of $20,375 for earned but unused vacation, (4) accelerated vesting of 35,602 RSUs that were otherwise scheduled to vest in March 2022, and (5) in connection with his participation in the MSPP and pursuant to its terms, vesting of 12,991 MSPP RSUs plus a cash payment in the amount of $556,420 representing the return of prior year short-term incentive cash bonuses used to purchase MSPP RSUs plus interest at the applicable one-year U.S. Treasury bill rate. The payments referenced in (1), (2), and (3) above were made pursuant to Mr. Buckhout's Severance Agreement with the Company and are reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above; the payments referenced in (4) and (5) above are attributable to compensation awards granted before 2022 that were reported in prior year Summary Compensation Tables. No payment was made to Mr. Buckhout with respect to his participation in the 2021 or 2022 STI Plans and no shares vested in connection with the last vesting tranche of his 2019 PSU award granted May 14, 2019.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Amit Goel | | | | | | | | | | |
| Severance and Other Benefits | | | | | | | |
With regard to payments made to Mr. Goel's in connection with his termination of employment on September 9, 2022, the only payments made to him were: (1) his end-of-service bonus in the amount of $52,000 in recognition of his contributions to CIRCOR in restating its financial statements, filing the 2021 Form 10-K and filing the Q1 2022 Form 10-Q, (2) payment in the amount of $27,158 for earned but unused vacation, and (3) consulting fees in the amount of $25,800 for post-termination consulting services, in each case as reflected in the Summary Compensation Table above.
CEO PAY RATIO
Under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are required to disclose the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (excluding our CEO), the annual total compensation of our principal executive officer, and the ratio of these two amounts.
There have been no significant changes in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements in our last completed fiscal year that we believe would significantly impact our pay ratio disclosure. Accordingly, we are using the same median employee as we used for purposes of our Fiscal Year 2020 pay ratio disclosure. We used December 31, 2020 as the date for identifying our median employee as it corresponded to the end of our fiscal year. As of December 31, 2020, we employed 3,263 employees globally. We included all of our full-time employees (but not the CEO), part-time employees and consultants (other than those whose pay was determined by a third party) in our analysis, and we identified our median employee by ranking total compensation based on employees' base pay on December 31, 2020. We use base pay as a reasonable alternative measure for annual total compensation since our incentive and equity plans do not have broad participation across our employee population. Adjustments were made to annualize the compensation for full-time and part-time employees who were not employed for all of 2020. We did not apply any cost-of-living adjustments as part of the calculation. Using this methodology, our median employee was determined to be a full-time employee.
The 2022 annual compensation of our median employee was $68,608, calculated in accordance with the rules applicable to the Summary Compensation Table found in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. For 2022, both Mr. Buckhout and Mr. Najjar served non-concurrently in capacity as our CEO, and their combined 2022 annual compensation was $3,764,258, including Mr. Buckhout's severance pay, as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table. Our estimate of the ratio of Messrs. Buckhout and Najjar's combined annual total compensation to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees is 55-to-1.
Mr. Najjar served in the capacity of either Interim Chief Executive Officer or Chief Executive Officer from January 19, 2022 through the end of 2022. When calculated relative to Mr. Najjar's 2022 annual compensation as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table ($1,960,745), the ratio of his compensation to the above referenced median annual total compensation of all other employees is 29-to-1.
The SEC’s rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee's annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies to apply certain exclusions and make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. Given the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine their estimates of pay ratio, including different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions allowed under SEC rules, and different employment and compensation practices among companies, the ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between CIRCOR and other companies.
Compensation Committee Report
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for Fiscal Year 2022 with management. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Submitted by the Compensation Committee of the Board
John (Andy) O'Donnell
Tina M. Donikowski
Bruce M. Lisman
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Except for the information required by Section 201(d) of Regulation S-K which is set forth below, the information required under this item is incorporated by reference to the Company’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the close of the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Plan category | | Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and rights | | Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights | | Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in column (a)) |
| | (a) | | (b) | | (c) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | 407,631 | (1) | $44.62 | (2) | 1,247,421 |
| | | | | | |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | — | | $— | (2) | N/A |
| Total | | 407,631 | | $44.62 | | 1,247,421 |
(1)Reflects 41,310 stock options and 1,338 restricted stock units granted under the Company's 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, and 364,983 restricted stock units granted under the Company's 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan.
(2)The weighted-average exercise price does not take into account the shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock units, which have no exercise price.
Principal Stockholders
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 10, 2023, by:
•all persons known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock;
•each of our current directors;
•our NEOs included in the Summary Compensation Table appearing in this Proxy Statement; and
•all current directors and executive officers as a group.
The number of shares beneficially owned by each stockholder is determined under rules issued by the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Under these rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has sole or shared voting power or investment power and includes any shares as to which the individual or entity has the right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days after March 31, 2023, through the exercise of any stock option, RSU or other right. The inclusion in this Annual Report of such shares, however, does not constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of such shares. As of March 10, 2023, a total of 20,365,293 shares of our common stock were outstanding.
Unless otherwise indicated below, to our knowledge, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock except, to the extent authority is shared by spouses under applicable law. | | | | | | | | |
| Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned |
Name of Beneficial Owner(1) | Number(2) | Percent(2) |
BlackRock, Inc.(3) | 3,196,920 | | 15.7 |
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.(4) | 2,635,158 | | 12.9 |
Gabelli Entities(5) | 2,168,490 | | 10.7 |
Royce & Associates, LP(6) | 1,444,240 | | 7.1 |
Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLCs(7) | 1,357,094 | | 6.7 |
The Vanguard Group(8) | 1,292,582 | | 6.4 |
| | |
Scott Buckhout(9) | 86,305 | | * |
| Samuel R. Chapin | 10,994 | | * |
| Tina Donikowski | 15,396 | | * |
Arthur L George, Jr.(10) | — | | * |
| Bruce Lisman | 8,797 | | * |
| Helmuth Ludwig | 27,120 | | * |
|
| | | | | | |
| Plan category | | Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) |
| | | (a) | | (b) | | (c) |
| Equity compensation plans approved by security holders | | 944,061 | (1) | $35.10 | (3) | 952,825 |
| Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders | | 150,000 | (2) | $8.67 | (3) | N/A |
| Total | | 1,094,061 | | $26.33 | | 952,825 |
| | | | | | | | |
| Tony Najjar | 31,493 | | * |
| John (Andy) O'Donnell | 35,368 | | * |
| Arjun Sharma | 65,013 | | * |
| Jill D. Smith | 7,871 | | * |
| Forrest Tiedeman | 432 | | |
| Jessica W. Wenzell | 1,545 | | * |
| | |
| All current executive officers and directors as a group (ten) | 204,029 | | 1.0 |
* Less than 1%. | | | | | |
| (1) | Reflects 28,348 stock options and 1,050 restricted stock units granted underThe address of each stockholder in the Company’s Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, 534,152 stock options and 333,336 restricted stock units granted undertable is c/o CIRCOR International, Inc., 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 200, Burlington, MA 01803, except that the Company's 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, and 47,175 restricted stock units granted underaddress of BlackRock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055; the Company's 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan. |
| address of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. is 100 E. Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202; the address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, PA 19355; the address of the Gabelli Entities (as defined in Footnote 6) is One Corporate Center, Rye, NY 10580; the address of Royce & Associates is 745 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10151. |
| (2) | ReflectsThe number of shares of Common Stock outstanding used in calculating the percentage for each listed person and the directors and executive officers as a group includes the number of shares of Common Stock underlying stock options issued as an inducement equity award to our Presidentheld by such person or group that are exercisable, and CEO on April 9, 2013. This award was granted pursuant toRSUs that vest within 60 days after March 31, 2023, but excludes shares of Common Stock underlying stock options or RSUs held by any other person. Amounts in the inducement award exemption under Section 303A.08 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Details of this grant, including vesting terms, are set forth in Note 14, Share-Based Compensation, of the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report. |
| table include: 10,107 options for Mr. Najjar and 22,389 options for Mr. Sharma. |
| (3) | The weighted-average exercise priceinformation is based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 26, 2023 on behalf of BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”). According to the filing, BlackRock has sole investment discretion over 3,196,920 shares and sole voting authority over 3,163,656 shares. The firm does not take into accounthave the authority to vote 33,264 of the reported shares. |
| (4) | This information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 14, 2023, on behalf of T. Rowe Price Investment Management, Inc. (“Price Investment”) and T. Rowe Price Small-Cap Value Fund, Inc. (“T. Rowe Small Cap”). According to the filings, Price Investment has sole investment discretion over 2,635,158 shares issuable upon vestingand sole voting authority over 957,958 shares. T. Rowe Small Cap has sole voting authority over 1,654,843 shares. Price Investment does not serve as custodian of outstanding restricted stock units,the assets of any of its clients; in each instance, only the client or the client’s custodian or trustee bank has the right to receive dividends paid with respect to, and proceeds from the sale of, such securities. The ultimate power to direct the receipt of dividends paid with respect to, and the proceeds from the sale of, such securities, is vested in the individual and institutional clients which Price Investment serves as an investment adviser. Any and all discretionary authority which has been delegated to Price Investment may be revoked in whole or in part at any time. Not more than 5% of the class of such securities is owned by any one client subject to the investment advice of Price Investment. With respect to securities owned by any one of the registered investment companies sponsored by Price Investment which it also serves as investment adviser (the “T. Rowe Price Funds”), only the custodian for each of such T. Rowe Price Funds has the right to receive dividends paid with respect to, and proceeds from the sale of, such securities. No other person is known to have no exercise price.such right, except that the shareholders of each such T. Rowe Price Fund participate proportionately in any dividends and distributions so paid. |
| (5) | The information is based on Schedules 13F-HR and 13F-HR/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2023 and February 15, 2023, respectively (the “13F-HR Filings”), on behalf of Mario J. Gabelli and various entities which Mr. Gabelli directly or indirectly controls or for which he acts as chief investment officer including, but not limited to, Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Asset Management Inc., Gabelli & Company Investment Advisors, Inc., Teton Advisors, Inc., GGCP, Inc., GAMCO Investors, Inc., and Associated Capital Group, Inc. According to the 13F-HR Filings, Gabelli Funds, LLC, GAMCO Investors, Inc., Teton Advisors, Inc., and Gabelli & Company Investment Advisers, Inc. beneficially owned 665,083, 1,372,404,62,000, and 69,003 shares, respectively. |
| (6) | The information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 23, 2023 on behalf of Royce & Associates LP ("Royce Associates"). According to the filing, Royce Associates has sole investment discretion and and sole voting authority over 1,444,240 shares. |
| (7) | The information is based on a Form 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2023 on behalf of Segall Bryant & Hamill, LLC. According to the filing, Segall Bryant & Hamill has sole investment discretion over 1,357,094 shares and sole voting authority over 1,026,012 shares. |
| (8) | The information is based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 9, 2023 on behalf of The Vanguard Group. According to the filing, The Vanguard Group has sole investment discretion over 1,256,404 shares, shared investment discretion over 36,178 shares, and shared voting authority over 18,434 shares. The firm does not have the authority to vote 1,274,148 of the reported shares. |
| (9) | Mr. Buckhout terminated his employment with the Company on January 19, 2022 and information provided is as of that date. |
| (10) | Arthur L. George, Jr. joined the Board of Directors on January 26, 2022 and resigned on July 22, 2022, due to health reasons. |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Director Independence
The information required under this itemBoard, upon consideration of all relevant facts and circumstances and upon recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, has affirmatively determined that each of Mr. Chapin, Ms. Donikowski, Mr. Lisman, Mr. Ludwig, Mr. O’Donnell and Ms. Smith is incorporated by reference toindependent of the Company’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed withCompany. In evaluating the independence of each director, the
Board applied the standards and guidelines set forth in the applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) regulations in determining that each director has no later than 120 days aftermaterial relationship with the closeCompany, directly or as a partner, stockholder or affiliate of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The bases for the Board’s determination include, but are not limited to, the following:
•No director is an employee of the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.Company, or its subsidiaries or affiliates.
•No director has a family member who has received any compensation during the past three years from the Company. •No director, during the past three years, has been affiliated with, or had an immediate family member who has been affiliated with, a present or former internal or external auditor of the Company.
•No executive officer of the Company serves on the compensation committee or the board of directors of any corporation that employs a director or a member of any director’s immediate family.
•No director is an officer or employee (or has an immediate family member who is an officer or employee) of an organization that sells products and services to, or receives products and services from, the Company in excess of the greater of $1 million or 2% of such organization’s consolidated gross revenues in any fiscal year.
Related Party Transactions
The Company’s Board of Directors has adopted a Related Party Transactions Policy that requires that any proposed transaction involving the Company or a subsidiary of the Company in which a director or executive officer has direct economic or beneficial interest shall be reviewed and approved by the Audit Committee of the Board.
Since the beginning of Fiscal Year 2022, the Company was not a participant in any transaction in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000 and in which an executive officer, director, director nominee or 5% stockholder (or their immediate family members) had a material direct or indirect interest, and no such person was indebted to the Company.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required under this item is incorporatedfollowing table summarizes the fees we incurred for professional services provided by reference toErnst & Young, LLP for fiscal year 2022 and 2021, for audit, tax and other services:
Auditor Fees ($ in Thousands)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fiscal Year | 2022 | | 2021 |
Audit Fees (1) | $ | 5,800 | | | $ | 6,400 | |
| | | |
Tax Fees (2) | 154 | | | 29 | |
All Other Fees (3) | 8 | | | 8 | |
| Total | $ | 5,962 | | | $ | 6,437 | |
(1) For the Company’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Regulation 14A, which proxy statement will be filed withprofessional services rendered for the Securities and Exchange Commission no later than 120 days after the closeaudit of the Company’s fiscalannual financial statements, for review of the financial statements included in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, for conducting of the independent auditor’s obligations relative to attestation of internal controls under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and performing local statutory audits. The 2021 amount also includes incremental professional services rendered for the restatement of the Company's financial statements as described within.
(2) The tax services performed in 2022 consisted of tax compliance and advisory services and tax services performed in 2021 consisted of tax compliance services.
(3) All other fees consisted of fees for an accounting research tool.
Audit Committee Pre-Approval
The Audit Committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval generally is provided for up to one year ended December 31, 2019.and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and generally is subject to a specific budget. The Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to its Chair when expediting of services is necessary. The independent auditors and management report annually to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed.
Part IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a)(1) Financial Statements
Report of PricewaterhouseCoopersErnst & Young LLP (PCAOB ID: 42) dated March 30, 202015, 2023 on the Company’sCompany's financial statements filed as a part hereof for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192022, and 2021 and on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20192022 is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The independent registered public accounting firm’sfirm's consent with respect to this report appears in ExhibitExhibit 23.1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
Other than our Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Rollforward included in Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, all other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not required, or because the required information is included either in the consolidated financial statements or in the notes thereto.
(a)(3) Exhibits
Unless otherwise indicated, references to exhibits in the table below being incorporated by reference are made in each case with respect to filings of the Company, SEC File No. 001-14962.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Exhibit | | |
| No. | | Description and Location |
| | Share Purchase Agreement, dated April 15, 2015, between the Company and affiliates and Schroedahl-ARAPP Spezialarmaturen GmbH & Co. KG and affiliates, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 15, 2015 |
|
| | |
| | Agreement and Plan of Merger dated October 12, 2016 by and among the Company, Downstream Holding, LLC, Downstream Acquisition LLC, and Sun Downstream, LP., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 14, 2016 |
| | Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2017, by and between Colfax Corporation and the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company's Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 25, 2017 |
| | Quota Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 13, 2019, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Quota Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 26, 2019, between CEP Holdings Sarl and P&P Flow Control AG, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on August 1, 2019 |
| | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of August 30, 2019, by and among Spence Engineering Company, Inc., Leslie Controls, Inc., Emerson Process Management Regulator Technologies, Inc. and the Company (for certain enumerated provisions), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 6, 2019 |
| | Amended and Restated Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 31, 2020, by and among CIRCOR Dovianus Holdings B.V., CIRCOR Aerospace, Inc., the Company and Crane Co., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on February 5, 2020 |
3 | | ArticlesSecurities Purchase Agreement, dated as of IncorporationJune 5, 2020, by and By-Laws:between CIRCOR Energy Products, LLC and Rheinsee 765. V V GmbH (Renamed into “MS Valves GmbH”), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 23, 2020 |
| | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on October 29, 2009August 7, 2020 |
| | Fourth Amended and Restated By-Laws, as amended, of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’sCompany's Form 10-Q,8-K, filed with the SEC on October 31, 2013 |
4 | | Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indenturesSept 28, 2022 |
| | Description of Securities Registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act (to link) |
10.1 | | Material Contracts: | | | | | | |
| | Credit Agreement, dated as of December 11, 2017, by and among the Company, as borrower, certain subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as term loan administrative agent and collateral agent, SunTrust Bank, as revolver administrative agent, swing line lender and a letter of credit issuer, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., as joint-lead arrangers and joint-bookrunners, and Citizens Bank, N.A. and HSBC Securities (USA) Inc. as co-managers incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 12, 2017 |
| | CIRCOR International, Inc. AmendedAmendment No 2. to the Credit Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2020, by and Restated 1999 Stock Optionamong the Company, certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, the lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as term loan administrative agent and Incentive Plan (as amended, the “1999 Stock Optionas collateral agent and Incentive Plan ”)Trust Bank (formerly known as SunTrust Bank), as revolver administrative agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.410.56 to the Company’s Form S-8, File No. 333-125237,10-K, filed with the SEC on May 25, 2005March 31, 2020 |
| | First Amendment No. 3 to the 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan,Credit Agreement, dated as of December 1, 2005,February 26, 2020, by and among the Company, certain domestic subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, the lenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as term loan administrative agent and as collateral agent and Trust Bank (formerly known as SunTrust Bank), as revolver administrative agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 7, 2005February 28, 2020 |
| | Second Amendment No. 4 to the 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan,Credit Agreement, dated as of February 12, 2014, incorporated hereinMay 18, 2020, by reference to Exhibit 10.6 toand among the Company's Form 10-K, filed withCompany, Inc., certain domestic subsidiaries of the SEC on March, 1 2018 |
| | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Employees (Three Year Cliff Vesting) underCompany, as guarantors, the 1999 Stock Optionlenders party thereto, Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as term loan administrative agent and Incentive Plan as collateral agent and Truist Bank (formerly known as SunTrust Bank), as revolver administrative agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q,8-K, filed with the SEC on May 10, 201022, 2020 |
| | CIRCOR International, Inc. Amended and Restated Management Stock Purchase Plan dated as of January 1, 2017, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March1, 2018 |
| | Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into by the Company and its directors and certain of its officers incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 12, 2003 |
| | Executive Change of Control Agreement between CIRCOR, Inc. and Arjun Sharma, dated September 1, 2009, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on October 29, 2009 |
| | Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement between CIRCOR, Inc. and Arjun Sharma, dated November 4, 2010, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 5, 2010 |
| | Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2013, between the Company and Scott A Buckhout incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013 |
| | Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2013, between the Company and Scott A Buckhout, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013 |
|
| | |
| | Stock Option Inducement Award Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2013, between the Company and Scott A Buckhout, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013 |
| | Severance Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2013, between the Company and Scott A Buckhout, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013 |
| | Amended Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2013, between the Company and Scott A. Buckhout, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2015 |
| | Executive Change of Control Agreement, dated as of April 9, 2013, between the Company and Scott A Buckhout, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 15, 2013 |
| | Performance-Based Stock Option Award Agreement, dated as of March 5, 2014, between the Company and Scott A. Buckhout, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on March 11, 2014 |
| | CIRCOR International, Inc. 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan 201 (the "2014“2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan"Plan”) incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC on March 21, 2014 |
| | First Amendment to 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, dated February 12, 2014, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 18, 2015 |
| | |
| | Executive Change of Control Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2015, between the Company and Andrew Farnsworth, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on July 29, 2015 |
| | Executive Change of Control Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2016, between the Company and David Mullen, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2016 |
| | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement For Employees and Directors under the 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement For Employees and Directors under the 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.30 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement For Directors under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.31 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement For Employees and Directors under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Form of Management Stock Purchase Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement For Employees and Directors under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Employees under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.34 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement Forfor Employees under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Executive Change of Control Agreement, dated as of 2016, between the Company and Sumit Mehrotra, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Severance Agreement, dated as of December 9, 2016, between the Company and Sumit Mehrotra, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.39 of the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on February 21, 2017 |
| | Stockholders Agreement, dated December 11, 2017, between the Company and Colfax Corporation, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 12, 2017 |
| | Severance Agreement, dated as of April 21, 2017, between the Company and Arjun Sharma, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on April 28, 2017 |
| | Executive Change of Control Agreement between CIRCOR, International Inc. and Chadi Chahine, dated January 7, 2019, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 1, 2019. |
|
| | |
| | Severance Agreement, dated January 7, 2019, between the Company and Chadi Chahine, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10. to the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 1, 2019. |
| | Executive Change of Control Agreement between CIRCOR, Inc. and Lane Walker, dated October 10, 2018, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10. to the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 1, 2019. |
| | Severance Agreement, dated October 10, 2018, between the Company and Lane Walker, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10. to the Company's Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 1, 2019. |
| | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Employees under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2019 |
| | Form of Management Stock Purchase Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Employees and Directors under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2019 |
| | Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Employees under the 2014 Stock Option Andand Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2019 |
| | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Employees under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2019 |
| | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Directors under the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2019 |
| | CIRCOR International, Inc. 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the “2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan”), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 ofto the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 14, 2019 |
| | Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Employees under the 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 1, 2019 |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Amendment to Executive ChangeForm of ControlUpdated Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Chadi Chahine,under the 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on AugustJune 1, 20192020 |
| | Amendment to Executive ChangeForm of Control2020 Special One Year Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Lane Walker,under the 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of10.9 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on AugustJune 1, 20192020 |
| | Amendment to Executive ChangeForm of ControlRestricted Stock Unit Agreement for Tony Najjar,Employees under the 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of10.10 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on AugustJune 1, 20192020 |
| | Third Amendment to Executive ChangeForm of ControlRestricted Stock Unit Agreement for Arjun Sharma,Directors under the 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of10.11 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on AugustJune 1, 20192020 |
| | Second Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement for Andrew Farnsworth, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 1, 2019 |
| | Second Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement for David Mullen, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 1, 2019 |
| | Second Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement for Scott Buckhout, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 1, 2019 |
| | Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement for Sumit Mehrotra, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 1, 2019 |
| | Second Amendment to Executive Change of Control Agreement for Sumit Mehrotra, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 1, 2019 |
| | Guaranty dated August 30, 2019 by Company to Emerson Process Management Regulator Technologies, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 6, 2019 |
| | First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Management Stock Purchase Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on November 13, 2019 |
| | Lane Walker Transaction BonusOffer Letter, (to link)dated March 28, 2020, between the Company and Abhishek Khandelwal, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on June 1, 2020 |
| | Amendment No 2.Form of Inducement Restricted Stock Unit Agreement between the Company and Abhishek Khandelwal, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Credit AgreementCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-8, File No. 333-237554, filed with the SEC on April 2, 2020 |
| | Form of Amended and Restated Executive Change in Control Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q, filed with the SEC on August 7, 2020 |
| | Form of Severance Agreement between the Company and each of its executive officers other than Scott A. Buckhout, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.32 to the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2021 |
| | Form of Restrictive Covenants Agreement between the Company and each of its executive officers, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s 2020 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 15, 2021 |
| | Credit Agreement, dated as of December 20, 2021, by and among the Company, as borrower, certain subsidiaries of the Company, as guarantors, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Truist Bank, as administrative agent, collateral agent, swing line lender and a letter of credit issuer, and Truist Securities, Inc., Citizen Bank, N.A. and Keybanc Capital Markets Inc. as joint lead arrangers and joint bookrunners incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on December 22, 2022 |
| | Separation Agreement and Release, dated July 5, 2021, between the Company and Sumit Mehrotra, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s 2021 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on July 26, 2022 |
| | Executive Retention Agreement, dated January 14, 2022, between the Company and AJ Sharma incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on January 19, 2022. |
| | Executive Retention Agreement, dated January 14, 2022, between the Company and Jessica W. Wenzell, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s 2021 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on July 26, 2022 |
| | Agreement and Release, dated January 19, 2022 between the Company and Scott A. Buckhout, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.38 to the Company’s 2021 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on July 26, 2022 |
| | Letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to the SEC, dated June 5, 2020, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 16.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on June 5, 2020 |
| | CIRCOR International, Inc. 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 28, 2021 |
| | Amendment No. 1 to Credit Agreement, dated as of April 8, 2022, by and among CIRCOR International, Inc., as borrower, the other credit parties party thereto, each lender and letter of credit issuer from time to time party thereto and Truist Bank, as administrative agent and collateral agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on April 13, 2022 |
| | Amendment No. 2 to Credit Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on May 31, 2022 |
| | Schedule of Subsidiaries of CIRCOR International, Inc. |
| | Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopersErnst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
| | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
| | |
| | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
| | | | | | | | |
| 101 | | The following financial statements from CIRCOR International, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, as filed with the SEC on March 30, 2020,15, 2023, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language), as follows: |
| (i) | | Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 |
| (ii) | | Consolidated Statements of IncomeOperations for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 |
| (iii) | | Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Income for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 |
| (iv) | | Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 |
| (v) | | Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 |
| (vi) | | Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements |
| |
* | * The Company hereby agrees to provide the Commission, upon request, copies of any omitted exhibits or schedules to this exhibit required by Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. |
| |
** | Filed with this report. |
| |
*** | Furnished with this report. |
| |
§ | Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
*** Furnished with this report. § Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | | | | | | | |
| | CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. |
| | |
| By: | CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC./s/ Tony Najjar |
| | |
| By: | /s/ Scott A. Buckhout |
| | Scott A. Buckhout
Tony Najjar
President and Chief Executive Officer |
| | |
| Date: | March 30, 202015, 2023 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | | | | |
| Signature | Title | Date |
/s/ Scott A. BuckhoutTony Najjar | President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) | March 30, 202015, 2023 |
Scott A. BuckhoutTony Najjar | | |
/s/ GregoryArjun Sharma | Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President, Business Development (Principal Financial Officer) | March 15, 2023 |
| Arjun Sharma | | |
/s/ Joseph C. BowenLosak, II | Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Financial and
(Principal Accounting Officer) | March 30, 202015, 2023 |
GregoryJoseph C. BowenLosak, II | | |
/s/ David F. DietzHelmuth Ludwig | ChairmanChair of the Board of Directors | March 30, 202015, 2023 |
David F. DietzHelmuth Ludwig | | |
| /s/ Samuel R. Chapin | Director | March 15, 2023 |
| Samuel R. Chapin | | |
| /s/ Tina M. Donikowski | Director | March 30, 202015, 2023 |
| Tina M. Donikowski | | |
/s/ Helmuth LudwigBruce M. Lisman | Director | March 30, 202015, 2023 |
Helmuth LudwigBruce M. Lisman | | |
/s/ Samuel Chapin | Director | March 30, 2020 |
Samuel Chapin | | |
| /s/ John A. O'Donnell | Director | March 30, 202015, 2023 |
| John A. O’Donnell | | |
/s/ Peter M. Wilver | Director | March 30, 2020 |
Peter M. Wilver | | |
| /s/ Jill D. Smith | Director | March 30, 202015, 2023 |
| Jill D. Smith | | |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors and Shareholders of CIRCOR International, Inc.
OpinionsOpinion on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of CIRCOR International, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”)Company) as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018, and2021, the related consolidated statements of (loss)operations, comprehensive income comprehensive (loss) income,, cash flows and shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, including2022, and the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)(2) (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as ofat December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192022, in conformity with accounting principlesU.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the United Statesstandards of America. Also in our opinion, the Public Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effectiveAccounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO because material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting existed asCommittee of that date related to (i) not maintaining a sufficient complement of corporate personnel with appropriate levels of accounting and controls knowledge and experience commensurate with the Company’s financial reporting requirements, (ii) not designing and maintaining effective controls to analyze, account for and review non-routine transactions at the corporate level, and (iii) not designing and maintaining effective controls over the preparation, review and approval of account reconciliations prepared at the corporate level and certainSponsoring Organizations of the Company’s shared service locations.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weaknesses referred to above are described in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A. We considered these material weaknesses in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2019 consolidated financial statements,Treadway Commission (2013 framework), and our report dated March 15, 2023, expressed an adverse opinion regarding the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting does not affect our opinion on those consolidated financial statements.thereon.
Changes in Accounting Principles
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed the manner in which it accounts for leases in 2019 and the manner in which it accounts for revenue from contracts with customers in 2018.
Basis for OpinionsOpinion
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidatedThese financial statements for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessmentare the responsibility of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in management's report referred to above.Company's management. Our responsibility is to express opinionsan opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditsaudit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
fraud. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements. Ourstatements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit of internalmatter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the account or disclosure to which it relates.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment for the Industrial Reporting Unit
| | | | | | | | |
| Description of the Matter | | As discussed in Note 9 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $119.8 million as of December 31, 2022. The goodwill associated with the Industrial reporting unit amounted to $62.5 million as of December 31, 2022. Management performs an impairment assessment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis as of the Company’s October month end or more frequently if circumstances warrant. In completing its annual goodwill impairment assessment, the Company measures the fair value of the Industrial reporting unit using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. The Company corroborated the valuations that arose from the discounted cash flow approach by performing both a market multiple valuation and by reconciling the aggregate fair value of its reporting units to its market capitalization at the time of the assessment. The fair value of each reporting unit was compared to the respective carrying value as of the date of the assessment.
Auditing management’s goodwill impairment assessment for the Industrial reporting unit was complex and judgmental due to the significant estimation required in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. In particular, the fair value estimates were sensitive to significant assumptions such as the rate of revenue growth and the discount rate which contemplate business, market and overall economic conditions
|
| How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit | | We obtained an understanding, evaluated the design and tested the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s process to complete its goodwill impairment assessment. Our procedures included testing management’s controls over the review of the Industrial reporting unit’s valuation model, including review of the significant assumptions discussed above.
To test the estimated fair value of the Company’s Industrial reporting unit, with the support of our valuation specialists, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the valuation methodologies used by the Company and testing the significant assumptions and the completeness and accuracy of underlying data used by management in its assessment. We compared the rate of revenue growth to management’s internal projections and historical results, current and forecasted industry and economic trends, analyst reports, and forecasted peer company information. With the assistance of our valuation specialists, we evaluated the selection of the discount rate by developing a range of independent estimates and comparing those to the rate selected by management. We also involved our valuation specialists to evaluate the market approach, including evaluating the reasonableness of the selected comparable publicly traded companies and the resulting market multiples calculation. In addition, we assessed the historical accuracy of management’s estimates and performed sensitivity analyses over the significant assumptions to evaluate the changes in the fair value of the reporting unit that would result from changes in the assumptions. We tested management's reconciliation of the fair value of the reporting units to the market capitalization of the Company. .
|
| | |
| | |
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2020.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 15, 2023
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of CIRCOR International, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited CIRCOR International Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the 2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses described below on the achievement of the objectives of the control criteria, CIRCOR International, Inc. (the Company) has not maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment. Management has identified three material weaknesses related to the Company’s financial statement close process and a material weakness related to information technology general controls and automated controls for significant IT applications and manual controls dependent upon the information derived from the impacted IT applications.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2022 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 15, 2023, which expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also includedrisk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions.opinion.
Subsequent Event
As discussed in Note 23 to the consolidated financial statements, as a result of the COVID-19 outbreak, the Company has experienced a significant decline in its market capitalization to below its consolidated book value. As a result, management has concluded that there will be a goodwill and an intangible asset impairment triggering event in the first quarter of 2020, which will result in management performing an impairment evaluation of its goodwill and intangible asset balances.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i)(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii)(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii)(3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
88
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Goodwill Impairment Assessment
As described in Notes 2 and 10 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated goodwill balance was $272 million as of December 31, 2019. Management performs an impairment assessment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis as of the Company’s October month end or more frequently if circumstances warrant. The annual impairment assessment requires a comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to the respective carrying value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit is greater than the fair value, an impairment loss will be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. Goodwill allocated to reporting units as of December 31, 2019 excluded amounts allocated to disposed businesses and the Instrumentation & Sampling disposal group which was held for sale. With the assistance of an independent third-party appraisal firm, management estimates the fair value of the reporting units using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. The key assumptions utilized in the discounted cash flow model include estimates of the rate of revenue growth, including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, as well as the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the goodwill impairment assessment is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management when developing the fair value measurement of the reporting units and, as described in the “Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting” section, a material weakness was identified as of December 31, 2019 related to an insufficient complement of corporate personnel with appropriate levels of accounting and controls knowledge and experience commensurate with the Company’s financial reporting requirements. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence relating to management’s cash flow projections and significant assumptions, including the rate of revenue growth, including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, as well as the discount rate
based on a weighted average cost of capital. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s goodwill impairment assessment, including controls over the valuation of the Company’s reporting units. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for developing the fair value measurement. This included evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model, testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the model, and evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management, including the rate of revenue growth, including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, and the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital. Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assumptions related to the rate of revenue growth, including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, and the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the reporting units, (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data, and (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the appropriateness of the Company’s discounted cash flow model and certain significant assumptions, including the discount rate.
Fair Value of the Distributed Valves Disposal Group
As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company classified the Distributed Valves business as a disposal group held for sale in the third quarter of 2019. The Company initially measured the disposal group held for sale at the lower of the carrying value or the fair value less any costs to sell. The loss resulting from this measurement was recognized in the period in which the held for sale criteria were met. The Company assessed the fair value of the disposal group less any costs to sell each reporting period until the date of sale. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recognized a valuation allowance of $39.8 million to adjust the carrying value of the disposal group to its fair value less expected costs to sell value of $2.3 million. Management calculated the fair value of the disposal group held for sale using an income approach based on the present value of projected future cash flows. This approach incorporates several key assumptions which include the rate of revenue growth, including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, the projected operating margin, as well as the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the fair value of the Distributed Valves disposal group is a critical audit matter are there was significant judgment by management when developing the fair value measurement of the disposal group and, as described in the “Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting” section, a material weakness was identified as of December 31, 2019 related to an insufficient complement of corporate personnel with appropriate levels of accounting and controls knowledge and experience commensurate with the Company’s financial reporting requirements. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing procedures and in evaluating audit evidence relating to management’s cash flow projections and significant assumptions, including the rate of revenue growth, including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, the projected operating margin, as well as the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in performing these procedures and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures including testing the effectiveness of controls relating to management’s fair value assessment of the Distributed Valves disposal group, including controls over the development of assumptions relating to the cash flow projections. These procedures also included, among others, testing management’s process for developing the fair value measurement of the disposal group. This included evaluating the appropriateness of the discounted cash flow model, testing the completeness, accuracy, and relevance of underlying data used in the model, and evaluating the reasonableness of the significant assumptions used by management, including the rate of revenue growth, including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, the projected operating margin, and the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital. Evaluating the reasonableness of management’s assumptions related to the rate of revenue growth, including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, and the projected operating margin involved evaluating whether the assumptions used by management were reasonable considering (i) the current and past performance of the disposal group, (ii) the consistency with external market and industry data, (iii) whether these assumptions were consistent with evidence obtained in other areas of the audit. Professionals with specialized skill and knowledge were used to assist in the evaluation of the appropriateness of the Company’s discounted cash flow model and certain significant assumptions, including the discount rate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersErnst & Young LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2020
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.
CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Balance SheetsCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
| | | | December 31, | | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2022 | | 2021 |
| ASSETS | | | | ASSETS | | | |
| CURRENT ASSETS: | | | | CURRENT ASSETS: | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 84,531 |
| | $ | 68,517 |
| Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 64,275 | | | $ | 59,924 | |
| Trade accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,086 and $2,270, respectively | 125,422 |
| | 167,181 |
| |
| | Trade accounts receivable, net | | Trade accounts receivable, net | 109,754 | | | 100,149 | |
| Inventories | 137,309 |
| | 143,682 |
| Inventories | 139,786 | | | 123,343 | |
| | Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 66,664 |
| | 71,428 |
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 117,766 | | | 110,749 | |
| Assets held for sale | 161,193 |
| | 197,238 |
| |
| | Total Current Assets | 575,119 |
| | 648,046 |
| Total Current Assets | 431,581 | | | 394,165 | |
| PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET | 172,179 |
| | 189,672 |
| PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET | 141,141 | | | 154,461 | |
| OTHER ASSETS: | | | | OTHER ASSETS: | |
| Goodwill | 271,893 |
| | 450,605 |
| Goodwill | 119,847 | | | 122,906 | |
| Intangibles, net | 385,542 |
| | 440,281 |
| Intangibles, net | 256,338 | | | 303,476 | |
| | Deferred income taxes | 30,852 |
| | 19,906 |
| Deferred income taxes | 512 | | | 756 | |
| Assets held for sale | — |
| | 30,374 |
| |
| | Lease right-of-use assets, net | | Lease right-of-use assets, net | 42,491 | | | 21,139 | |
| Other assets | 35,360 |
| | 12,728 |
| Other assets | 20,777 | | | 22,395 | |
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 1,470,945 |
| | $ | 1,791,612 |
| TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 1,012,687 | | | $ | 1,019,298 | |
| LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | | LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | | | |
| CURRENT LIABILITIES: | | | | CURRENT LIABILITIES: | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 79,399 |
| | $ | 94,715 |
| Accounts payable | $ | 78,778 | | | $ | 83,382 | |
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 94,169 |
| | 92,496 |
| Accrued expenses and other current liabilities | 84,510 | | | 81,998 | |
| Accrued compensation and benefits | 19,518 |
| | 30,703 |
| Accrued compensation and benefits | 30,817 | | | 26,551 | |
| Liabilities held for sale | 43,289 |
| | 58,298 |
| |
| Notes payable and current portion of long-term debt | — |
| | 7,850 |
| |
| | Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt | | Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt | — | | | 1,611 | |
| Total Current Liabilities | 236,375 |
| | 284,062 |
| Total Current Liabilities | 194,105 | | | 193,542 | |
| LONG-TERM DEBT | 636,297 |
| | 778,187 |
| |
| DEFERRED INCOME TAXES | 21,425 |
| | 33,607 |
| |
| PENSION LIABILITY, NET | 146,801 |
| | 150,623 |
| |
| LIABILITIES HELD FOR SALE | — |
| | 861 |
| |
| Long-term debt | | Long-term debt | 496,534 | | | 511,694 | |
| Deferred income taxes | | Deferred income taxes | 18,238 | | | 21,721 | |
| Pension liability, net | | Pension liability, net | 85,968 | | | 120,881 | |
| | Long-term lease liabilities | | Long-term lease liabilities | 38,480 | | | 17,715 | |
| OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | 38,636 |
| | 15,279 |
| OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES | 20,316 | | | 20,029 | |
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 17) | | | | |
| COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 16 and 17) | | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 16 and 17) | |
| SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | | | | SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY: | |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding | — |
| | — |
| |
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 29,000,000 shares authorized; 19,912,362 and 19,845,205 shares issued at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | 213 |
| | 212 |
| |
| Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; — shares issued and outstanding | | Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; — shares issued and outstanding | — | | | — | |
| Common stock, $0.01 par value; 29,000,000 shares authorized; 21,736,911 and 21,633,131 shares issued at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | | Common stock, $0.01 par value; 29,000,000 shares authorized; 21,736,911 and 21,633,131 shares issued at December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively | 218 | | | 217 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | 446,657 |
| | 440,890 |
| Additional paid-in capital | 456,102 | | | 454,852 | |
| Retained earnings | 99,280 |
| | 232,102 |
| |
| Common treasury stock, at cost (1,372,488 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018) | (74,472 | ) | | (74,472 | ) | |
| Accumulated deficit | | Accumulated deficit | (178,693) | | | (198,081) | |
| Common treasury stock, at cost (1,372,488 shares at December 31, 2022 and 2021) | | Common treasury stock, at cost (1,372,488 shares at December 31, 2022 and 2021) | (74,472) | | | (74,472) | |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (80,267 | ) | | (69,739 | ) | Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (44,109) | | | (48,800) | |
| Total Shareholders’ Equity | 391,411 |
| | 528,993 |
| Total Shareholders’ Equity | 159,046 | | | 133,716 | |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 1,470,945 |
| | $ | 1,791,612 |
| TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY | $ | 1,012,687 | | | $ | 1,019,298 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of (Loss) IncomeCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
| | | | Year Ended December 31, | | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Net revenues | $ | 964,313 |
| | $ | 1,013,470 |
| | $ | 505,492 |
| Net revenues | $ | 786,919 | | | $ | 758,667 | | | $ | 765,219 | |
| Cost of revenues | 655,504 |
| | 688,267 |
| | 332,818 |
| Cost of revenues | 529,832 | | | 528,291 | | | 533,005 | |
| Gross Profit | 308,809 |
| | 325,203 |
| | 172,674 |
| |
| Gross profit | | Gross profit | 257,087 | | | 230,376 | | | 232,214 | |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 248,256 |
| | 284,641 |
| | 146,478 |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 213,294 | | | 224,927 | | | 223,386 | |
| Special and restructuring charges, net | 22,872 |
| | 18,909 |
| | 9,889 |
| |
| Operating income | 37,681 |
| | 21,653 |
| | 16,307 |
| |
| Goodwill impairment charges | | Goodwill impairment charges | — | | | 10,500 | | | 138,078 | |
| Special and restructuring (recoveries) charges, net | | Special and restructuring (recoveries) charges, net | (19,013) | | | 24,272 | | | (34,303) | |
| Operating income (loss) | | Operating income (loss) | 62,806 | | | (29,323) | | | (94,947) | |
| Other expense (income): | | | | | | Other expense (income): | | | | | |
| Interest expense, net | 48,609 |
| | 52,975 |
| | 10,841 |
| Interest expense, net | 44,886 | | | 32,365 | | | 34,219 | |
| Other (income) expense, net | (836 | ) | | (7,426 | ) | | 1,826 |
| |
| Other income, net | | Other income, net | (5,747) | | | (3,826) | | | (1,594) | |
| Total other expense, net | 47,773 |
| | 45,549 |
| | 12,667 |
| Total other expense, net | 39,139 | | | 28,539 | | | 32,625 | |
| (Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes | (10,092 | ) | | (23,896 | ) | | 3,640 |
| |
| Provision for (Benefit from) income taxes | 14,676 |
| | 9,451 |
| | (7,211 | ) | |
| (Loss) Income from continuing operations, net of tax | (24,768 | ) |
| (33,347 | ) |
| 10,851 |
| |
| (Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of tax | (109,167 | ) | | (6,037 | ) | | 938 |
| |
| Net (Loss) Income | $ | (133,935 | ) | | $ | (39,384 | ) | | $ | 11,789 |
| |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | | Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes | 23,667 | | | (57,862) | | | (127,572) | |
| Provision for income taxes | | Provision for income taxes | 4,279 | | | 5,182 | | | 55,902 | |
| Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax | | Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax | 19,388 | | | (63,044) | | | (183,474) | |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | | Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | — | | | 1,406 | | | (35,140) | |
| Net Income (loss) | | Net Income (loss) | $ | 19,388 | | | $ | (61,638) | | | $ | (218,614) | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic (Loss) Income per common share: | | | | | | |
| Basic Income (loss) income per common share: | | Basic Income (loss) income per common share: | |
| Basic from continuing operations | $ | (1.24 | ) | | $ | (1.68 | ) | | $ | 0.65 |
| Basic from continuing operations | $ | 0.95 | | | $ | (3.12) | | | $ | (9.18) | |
| Basic from discontinued operations | $ | (5.48 | ) | | $ | (0.30 | ) | | $ | 0.06 |
| Basic from discontinued operations | $ | — | | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | (1.76) | |
| Net (Loss) Income | $ | (6.73 | ) | | $ | (1.99 | ) | | $ | 0.71 |
| |
| Net Income (loss) | | Net Income (loss) | $ | 0.95 | | | $ | (3.05) | | | $ | (10.94) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Diluted (Loss) Income per common share: | | | | | | |
| Diluted Income (loss) income per common share: | | Diluted Income (loss) income per common share: | |
| Diluted from continuing operations | $ | (1.24 | ) | | $ | (1.68 | ) | | $ | 0.64 |
| Diluted from continuing operations | $ | 0.95 | | | $ | (3.12) | | | $ | (9.18) | |
| Diluted from discontinued operations | $ | (5.48 | ) | | $ | (0.30 | ) | | $ | 0.06 |
| Diluted from discontinued operations | $ | — | | | $ | 0.07 | | | $ | (1.76) | |
| Net (Loss) Income | $ | (6.73 | ) | | $ | (1.99 | ) | | $ | 0.70 |
| |
| Net Income (loss) | | Net Income (loss) | $ | 0.95 | | | $ | (3.05) | | | $ | (10.94) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding: | | | | | | Weighted average common shares outstanding: | |
| Basic | 19,903 |
| | 19,834 |
| | 16,674 |
| Basic | 20,350 | | | 20,201 | | | 19,982 | |
| Diluted | 19,903 |
| | 19,834 |
| | 16,849 |
| Diluted | 20,427 | | | 20,201 | | | 19,982 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) IncomeCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (133,935 | ) | | $ | (39,384 | ) | | $ | 11,789 |
|
| Other comprehensive (loss) income: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (4,740 | ) | | (20,523 | ) | | 34,119 |
|
| Interest rate swap adjustments (1) | (5,390 | ) | | (1,516 | ) | | — |
|
| Other net changes in post-retirement liabilities and assets - recognized actuarial (loss) gains (2) | (398 | ) | | (11,087 | ) | | 4,877 |
|
| Net periodic pension costs amortization (3) | — |
| | 117 |
| | 535 |
|
| Other comprehensive (loss) income | (10,528 | ) | | (33,009 | ) | | 39,531 |
|
| COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME | $ | (144,463 | ) | | $ | (72,393 | ) | | $ | 51,320 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Net Income (loss) | $ | 19,388 | | | $ | (61,638) | | | $ | (218,614) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: | | | | | |
| Foreign currency translation adjustments | (12,455) | | | (4,372) | | | 4,466 | |
| Interest rate swap adjustments (1) | (688) | | | 6,398 | | | 1,196 | |
| Other net changes in post-retirement liabilities and assets - recognized actuarial gains (loss) (2) | 17,834 | | | 38,303 | | | (13,846) | |
| | | | | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | 4,691 | | | 40,329 | | | (8,184) | |
| COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) | $ | 24,079 | | | $ | (21,309) | | | $ | (226,798) | |
| |
(1) | Net of an income tax effect of $1.6 million and $(0.5) million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. |
| |
(2) | Net of an income tax effect of $1.9 million, $3.3 million, and $1.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
| |
(3) | Net of an income tax effect of $0.0 million, $0.0 million, and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. |
(1)Net of an income tax effect of $(2.5) million, $0.0 million, and $0.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
(2)Net of an income tax effect of $0.0 million, $0.0 million, and $0.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Net (loss) income | $ | (133,935 | ) | | $ | (39,384 | ) | | $ | 11,789 |
|
| (Loss) income from discontinued operations | (109,167 | ) | | (6,037 | ) | | 938 |
|
| (Loss) income from continuing operations | (24,768 | ) | | (33,347 | ) | | 10,851 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 22,045 |
| | 26,183 |
| | 12,413 |
|
| Amortization | 47,591 |
| | 49,129 |
| | 14,621 |
|
| Provision for bad debt expense | 617 |
| | (261 | ) | | 777 |
|
| Loss on write down of inventory and amortization of fair value step-up | 366 |
| | 7,675 |
| | 7,175 |
|
| Compensation expense of share-based plans | 5,418 |
| | 4,965 |
| | 3,807 |
|
| Debt extinguishment | — |
| | — |
| | 1,810 |
|
| Change in fair value of contingent consideration | — |
| | — |
| | (12,200 | ) |
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | 4,622 |
| | 3,937 |
| | 759 |
|
| Deferred income tax benefit | (3,440 | ) | | (2,367 | ) | | (11,792 | ) |
| (Gain) loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment | (1,793 | ) | | 1,380 |
| | 349 |
|
| Loss on sale of businesses | 3,615 |
| | 1,882 |
| | 5,300 |
|
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures: | | | | | |
| Trade accounts receivable | 24,339 |
| | (12,229 | ) | | (17,232 | ) |
| Inventories | (9,557 | ) | | 6,620 |
| | 15,647 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | 7,360 |
| | (26,770 | ) | | (6,664 | ) |
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | (34,168 | ) | | 30,458 |
| | (16,085 | ) |
| Net cash provided by continuing operations | 42,247 |
| | 57,255 |
| | 9,536 |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by discontinued operations | (26,334 | ) | | (3,261 | ) | | 101 |
|
| Net cash provided by operating activities | 15,913 |
| | 53,994 |
| | 9,637 |
|
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Purchases of property, plant and equipment | (13,855 | ) | | (20,114 | ) | | (12,814 | ) |
| Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment | 6,172 |
| | 156 |
| | 785 |
|
| Proceeds from collection of beneficial interest | 861 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Proceeds from divestitures | 162,591 |
| | 2,753 |
| | — |
|
| Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired | — |
| | 3,727 |
| | (488,517 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing activities | 155,769 |
| | (13,478 | ) | | (500,546 | ) |
| Net cash used in discontinued investing activities | (2,733 | ) | | (3,399 | ) | | (1,578 | ) |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 153,036 |
| | (16,877 | ) | | (502,124 | ) |
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Proceeds from long-term debt | 281,600 |
| | 248,300 |
| | 1,090,883 |
|
| Payments of short-term and long-term debt | (434,797 | ) | | (260,146 | ) | | (523,183 | ) |
| Debt issuance costs | — |
| | — |
| | (30,366 | ) |
| Dividends paid | — |
| | — |
| | (2,506 | ) |
| Proceeds from the exercise of stock options | 253 |
| | 690 |
| | 740 |
|
| Return of cash to seller | — |
| | (62,917 | ) | | — |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by continuing financing activities | (152,944 | ) | | (74,073 | ) | | 535,568 |
|
| Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities | (152,944 | ) | | (74,073 | ) | | 535,568 |
|
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents | 197 |
| | (5,812 | ) | | 8,996 |
|
| INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | 16,202 |
| | (42,768 | ) | | 52,077 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | 69,525 |
| | 112,293 |
| | 58,279 |
|
| CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR | $ | 85,727 |
| | $ | 69,525 |
| | $ | 110,356 |
|
| Cash paid during the year for: | | | | | |
| Income taxes | $ | 16,711 |
| | $ | 633 |
| | $ | 9,984 |
|
| Interest | $ | 47,544 |
| | $ | 50,326 |
| | $ | 6,778 |
|
| Non-cash supplemental information: | | | | | |
| Share issuance for business acquisition | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 143,767 |
|
| Accrued purchase price | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4,824 |
|
| Payable to seller related to cash balances | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 65,314 |
|
| Change in fair value for shares issued in acquisition | $ | — |
| | $ | (3,783 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Accrued purchase price settled | $ | — |
| | $ | (2,299 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Net Income (loss) | $ | 19,388 | | | $ | (61,638) | | | $ | (218,614) | |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes | — | | | 1,406 | | | (35,140) | |
| Income (Loss) from continuing operations, net of tax | 19,388 | | | (63,044) | | | (183,474) | |
| Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: | | | | | |
| Depreciation | 19,691 | | | 22,854 | | | 20,401 | |
| Amortization | 36,360 | | | 42,304 | | | 43,662 | |
| Change in provision for bad debt expense | (813) | | | 1,213 | | | 6,274 | |
| Write down of inventory | 2,606 | | | 3,364 | | | 4,272 | |
| | | | | |
| Compensation expense of share-based plans | 1,880 | | | 5,252 | | | 5,488 | |
| Loss on debt extinguishment | 4,977 | | | 8,693 | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| Amortization of debt issuance costs | 3,645 | | | 3,996 | | | 7,460 | |
| Deferred income tax (benefit) provision | (3,709) | | | (2,992) | | | 46,774 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Goodwill impairment charges | — | | | 10,500 | | | 138,078 | |
| Other impairment charges | 8,011 | | | — | | | — | |
| Loss (gain) on sale of businesses | — | | | 1,919 | | | (54,429) | |
| Gain on sale of real estate | (47,977) | | | — | | | — | |
| Loss on deconsolidation charges | 4,675 | | | — | | | — | |
| Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions and divestitures: | | | | | |
| Trade accounts receivable | (9,649) | | | (6,308) | | | 26,211 | |
| Inventories | (26,299) | | | (6,974) | | | 4,366 | |
| Prepaid expenses and other assets | (22,218) | | | (23,665) | | | (29,255) | |
| Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities | 8,611 | | | 15,820 | | | (43,748) | |
| | | | | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by continuing operations | (821) | | | 12,932 | | | (7,920) | |
| Net cash used in discontinued operations | — | | | (2,484) | | | (14,561) | |
| Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities | (821) | | | 10,448 | | | (22,481) | |
| INVESTING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Additions of property, plant and equipment | (21,988) | | | (14,747) | | | (12,222) | |
| Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment | 104 | | | 2 | | | (322) | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Proceeds from beneficial interest of factored receivables | 4,484 | | | 2,047 | | | 2,957 | |
| Proceeds from sale of real estate | 54,945 | | | — | | | — | |
| Proceeds from sale of business | — | | | 9,993 | | | 165,540 | |
| | | | | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) continuing investing activities | 37,545 | | | (2,705) | | | 155,953 | |
| Net cash used in discontinued investing activities | — | | | — | | | (11,658) | |
| Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities | 37,545 | | | (2,705) | | | 144,295 | |
| FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | | | |
| Proceeds from long-term debt | 219,266 | | | 734,612 | | | 219,000 | |
| Payments of long-term debt | (227,041) | | | (729,551) | | | (352,916) | |
| Net change in short-term borrowings | (1,573) | | | (374) | | | 372 | |
| | | | | |
| Equipment financing | 894 | | | — | | | — | |
| Proceeds from the exercise of stock options | — | | | 151 | | | 118 | |
| Withholding tax payments on net share settlements on equity rewards | (1,311) | | | (4,209) | | | (713) | |
| Payment of debt issuance costs | (16,701) | | | (12,157) | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Net cash used in financing activities | (26,466) | | | (11,528) | | | (134,139) | |
| Effect of exchange rate changes on cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | (4,908) | | | (3,448) | | | 3,878 | |
| INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH | 5,350 | | | (7,233) | | | (8,447) | |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year | 61,374 | | | 68,607 | | | 77,054 | |
| CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS, AND RESTRICTED CASH AT END OF YEAR | $ | 66,724 | | | $ | 61,374 | | | $ | 68,607 | |
| Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Cash paid for income taxes | $ | 8,622 | | | $ | 7,264 | | | $ | 11,085 | |
| Cash paid for interest | $ | 42,795 | | | $ | 31,430 | | | $ | 33,993 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ EquityCONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common Stock | | Additional Paid-in Capital | | Retained Earnings | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income | | Treasury Stock | | Total Shareholders’ Equity |
| | | Shares | | Amount | |
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2016 | | 16,445 |
| | $ | 178 |
| | $ | 289,422 |
| | $ | 265,543 |
| | $ | (76,261 | ) | | $ | (74,472 | ) | | $ | 404,410 |
|
| Net income | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,789 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 11,789 |
|
| Cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of share-based compensation standard (ASU 2016-09) | | — |
| | — |
| | 755 |
| | (582 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 173 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 39,531 |
| | — |
| | 39,531 |
|
| Common stock dividends declared | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,507 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,507 | ) |
| Stock options exercised | | 18 |
| | — |
| | 707 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 707 |
|
| Conversion of restricted stock units | | 39 |
| | 1 |
| | 296 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 297 |
|
| Share-based plan compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | 3,807 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3,807 |
|
| Issuance of common stock to acquire business | | 3,283 |
| | 33 |
| | 143,734 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 143,767 |
|
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2017 | | 19,785 |
| | $ | 212 |
| | $ | 438,721 |
| | $ | 274,243 |
| | $ | (36,730 | ) | | $ | (74,472 | ) | | $ | 601,974 |
|
| Net loss | | | | | | | | (39,384 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (39,384 | ) |
| Cumulative effect adjustment related to the adoption of revenue recognition standard (ASC 606) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (2,757 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,757 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (33,009 | ) | | — |
| | (33,009 | ) |
| Stock options exercised | | 18 |
| | — |
| | 690 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 690 |
|
| Conversion of restricted stock units | | 42 |
| | — |
| | 291 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 291 |
|
| Share-based plan compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | 4,971 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4,971 |
|
| Measurement period change in fair value of common stock to acquire a business | | — |
| | — |
| | (3,783 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| (3,783 | ) |
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2018 | | 19,845 |
| | $ | 212 |
| | $ | 440,890 |
| | $ | 232,102 |
| | $ | (69,739 | ) | | $ | (74,472 | ) |
| $ | 528,993 |
|
| Net loss | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (133,935 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (133,935 | ) |
| Cumulative effect adjustment related to adoption of ASC 842 | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,113 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,113 |
|
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (10,528 | ) | | — |
| | (10,528 | ) |
| Stock options exercised | | 6 |
| | — |
| | 253 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 253 |
|
| Conversion of restricted stock units | | 61 |
| | 1 |
| | (65 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (64 | ) |
| Share-based plan compensation | | — |
| | — |
| | 5,579 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5,579 |
|
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2019 | | 19,912 |
| | $ | 213 |
| | $ | 446,657 |
| | $ | 99,280 |
| | $ | (80,267 | ) | | $ | (74,472 | ) | | $ | 391,411 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Common Stock | | Additional
Paid-in
Capital | | Retained
Earnings (Accumulated deficit) | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
(Loss) Income | | Treasury Stock | | Total
Shareholders’
Equity |
| | | Shares | | Amount | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2019 | | 19,912 | | | $ | 213 | | | $ | 446,657 | | | $ | 82,414 | | | $ | (80,945) | | | $ | (74,472) | | | $ | 373,867 | |
| Net income (loss) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (218,614) | | | — | | | — | | | (218,614) | |
| Cumulative effect adjustment related to adoption of ASC (326) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (222) | | | — | | | — | | | (222) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (8,184) | | | — | | | (8,184) | |
| Stock options exercised | | 3 | | | — | | | 118 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 118 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Conversion of restricted stock units | | 86 | | | 1 | | | 239 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 240 | |
| Share-based plan compensation | | — | | | — | | | 5,714 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,714 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2020 | | 20,001 | | | $ | 214 | | | $ | 452,728 | | | $ | (136,423) | | | $ | (89,129) | | | $ | (74,472) | | | $ | 152,919 | |
| Net income (loss) | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (61,638) | | | — | | — | | | (61,638) | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 40,329 | | | — | | | 40,329 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (21) | | | — | | | — | | | (21) | |
| Stock options exercised | | 5 | | | — | | | 151 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 151 | |
| Conversion of restricted stock units | | 255 | | | 3 | | | (3,279) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (3,276) | |
| Share-based plan compensation | | — | | | — | | | 5,252 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 5,252 | |
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2021 | | 20,261 | | | $ | 217 | | | $ | 454,852 | | | $ | (198,081) | | | $ | (48,800) | | | $ | (74,472) | | | $ | 133,716 | |
| Net income (loss) | | — | | | — | | | $ | — | | | 19,388 | | | — | | — | | 19,388 | |
| Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 4,691 | | | — | | | 4,691 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stock options exercised | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Conversion of restricted stock units | | 103 | | | 1 | | | (630) | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (629) | |
| Share-based plan compensation | | — | | | — | | | 1,880 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | 1,880 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2022 | | 20,364 | | | $ | 218 | | | $ | 456,102 | | | $ | (178,693) | | | $ | (44,109) | | | $ | (74,472) | | | $ | 159,046 | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
CIRCOR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial StatementsNOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Description of Business
CIRCOR International, Inc. (“CIRCOR” or the “Company” or “we”) designs, manufactures and distributes a broad array of flow and motion control products and certain services to a variety of end-markets for use in a wide range of applications to optimize the efficiency and/or ensure the safety of flow control systems. We haveCIRCOR has a global presence and operateoperates major manufacturing facilities in North America, Western Europe, Morocco, India and India.China.
As of December 31, 2019, we2022, the Company organized ourits business segment reporting structure into 3two segments: CIRCOR Energy ("Energy"), CIRCOR Aerospace and& Defense ("(“Aerospace and Defense"& Defense”) and CIRCOR Industrial ("Industrial"(“Industrial”). Refer to Note 19,18, Business Segment and Geographical Information, for further information about ourthe segments.
During 2018 and 2019, the Company entered into several significant transactions as described below.
In November 2018, the Company sold its Rosscor B.V. and SES International B.V. subsidiaries (the “Delden Business”) for a nominal amount. The Delden Business was our Netherlands-based fluid handling skids and systems business, primarily for the oil and gas end market. We maintain a 19.9% interest in the Delden Business, as well as the intellectual property rights to our two-screw pump product line. The Company determined that the accounting for this transaction is not material to our consolidated financial statements.
In January 2019,2020, the Company sold its Reliability Services ("RS") business for approximately $85 million in cash, on a cash-free, debt-free basis, subject to working capital and other adjustments of approximately $(5) million. The RS business provided lubrication management, chemical flushing services, and oil misting equipment tocompleted the oil and gas industry. The RS business was acquired as partsale of the acquisition of the Colfax Fluid Handling (“FH”) business, which is described further in Note 5, Business Acquisitions. The disposal group did not meet the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations. However, it did meet the criteria for presentation as held for sale. Accordingly, the RS assets and liabilities were collapsed as held for sale within our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2018.
In July 2019, the Company sold its Engineered Valves ("EV") business for a nominal amount, with an earnout of 50% of net income over seven years up to a maximum of $20.6 million (€18 million). The EV business is a long-cycle upstream oil and gas engineered value business. The disposal group met the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations, and is recorded as such within our consolidated financial statements. All prior period comparative financial information has been reclassified to conform with this presentation.
In August 2019, the Company sold certain assets and liabilities related to our Spence and Nicholson product lines for $84.5 million, subject to adjustment for working capital and other specified items of approximately $(0.5) million. The Spence and Nicholson product lines include steam regulators, control valves, safety relief valves, temperature regulators, steam traps and other steam accessories and solutions. The disposal group did not meet the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations.
In September 2019, the Company obtained approval from its Board of Directors to dispose of the Distributed Valves ("DV") business in a transaction or transfer to a third-party purchaser or purchasers. The DV business is a long-cycle upstream oil and gas engineered valve business. The disposal group met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and a discontinued operation, and is recorded as such within our consolidated financial statements. All prior period comparative financial information has been reclassified to conform with this presentation. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has not yet secured a buyer for the DV business but is actively marketing the business for sale. The Company anticipates completing the disposition within twelve months.
In December 2019, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to dispose of a non-core business, Instrumentation and Sampling (“I&S”) business.business to Crane Co. for $169.1 million in cash, net of working capital adjustments. The I&S business manufacturesmanufactured fittings, regulators, sampling systems and valves. The disposal group did not meet the criteria to be classified as a discontinued operation. However, it did meet
As of March 29, 2020, the criteriaCompany experienced a significant decline in its market capitalization below its consolidated book value. As a result, management concluded that there was a goodwill and an indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment triggering event for presentation as heldthe Company in the first quarter of 2020. Through its impairment analysis, the Company determined that goodwill in its Industrial segment was impaired and recognized a $138.1 million impairment. See Note 9, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Assets, for sale. Accordinglyadditional information on the I&S assets and liabilities were collapsed as held for sale within the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019. goodwill impairment.
In JanuaryJune 2020, the Company completed the saledisposition of the I&Sits Distributed Valves (“DV”) business to Crane Co. for $172at a cost of $10.8 million in cash, subject to ainclusive of working capital adjustment. See Note 23, Subsequent Events.
adjustments, while also retaining certain liabilities related to the business. The DV business was a long-cycle upstream oil and gas engineered valve business. This disposal group met the criteria to be classified as held for sale and a discontinued operation, and was recorded as such within the comparative consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019. For more information on the discontinued operations and held for sale transactions, see Note 3, Discontinued OperationsOperations.
In December 2021, the Company refinanced its term loan and revolving line of credit facility. See Note 12, Financing Arrangements for additional information on the refinancing.
In the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge in the amount of $10.5 million as a result of the Company's annual impairment assessment. See Note 9, Goodwill and Other Intangibles Assets, Held for Sale.additional information on the goodwill impairment.
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise indicated, amounts and activity are presented on a continuing operations basis.
As further described in the Explanatory Note in its 2021 Annual Report and Note 2 and Note 23 in Item 8 of the 2021 Annual Report, the discovery of accounting irregularities and investigation in its Pipeline Engineering business unit resulted in the Company restating its financial statements for prior periods. The restatement of prior period financial statements included the annual periods of 2020 and 2019, interim and year to date periods for 2020 and interim and year to date periods for the nine months ended October 3, 2021.
On April 14, 2022, the Company placed the Catterick, UK entity of the Pipeline Engineering business into Administration under the U.K. Insolvency Act of 1986 and the Insolvency (England and Wales) Rules 2016 (IR 2016). The loss of control triggered deconsolidation which effect is described in Note 5 Special and Restructuring (Recoveries) Charges, Net.
COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to impact the global economy, resulting in rapidly changing market and economic conditions. The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic continue to negatively impact the Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial position. The Company’s consolidated financial statements presented herein reflect management's estimates and assumptions regarding the effects of COVID-19 as of the date of the consolidated financial statements.
(2) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CIRCOR and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of companies acquired or divested are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition or up to the date of disposal. Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period financial statement presentation, including the results of discontinued operations and reportable segment information. These reclassifications have no effect on the previously reported net (loss) income.
Assets and Liabilities Held for Sale
The Company classifies assets and liabilities (disposal groups) to be sold as held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met: management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the disposal group; the disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject to terms customary for sales of such disposal groups; an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the disposal group have been initiated; the sale of the disposal group is probable, and transfer of the disposal group is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year; the disposal group is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
The Company initially measures a disposal group that is classified as held for sale at the lower of its carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell. Any loss resulting from this measurement is recognized in the period in which the held for sale criteria are met. Conversely, gains are not recognized on the sale of a disposal group until the date of sale. The Company assesses the fair value of a disposal group, less any costs to sell, each reporting period it remains classified as held for sale and reports any subsequent changes as an adjustment to the carrying value of the disposal group, as long as the new carrying value does not exceed the carrying value of the disposal group at the time it was initially classified as held for sale.
Upon determining that a disposal group meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, the Company reports the assets and liabilities of the disposal group, if material, in the line items assets held for sale and liabilities held for sale in the consolidated statements of financial position. Refer to Note 3, Discontinued Operations and Assets Held for Sale, for further information.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of these financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying disclosures. Some of the more significant estimates, some of which are impacted by management’s estimates and assumptions regarding the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, relate to acquisition accounting,recoverability of goodwill and indefinite-lived trade names, estimated total costs for ongoing long-term revenue contracts accounted for as performance obligations where transfer of control occurs over time, allowance for credit losses, inventory valuation, share-based compensation, amortization and impairment of long-lived assets, income taxes (including valuation allowance), fair value of disposal group, pension benefitsbenefit obligations, income taxes, penalty accruals for late shipments, asset valuations, and product warranties. While management believes that the estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of the financial statements are appropriate, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of control to the Company’s customers in an amount reflecting the considerationwhat the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for performance obligations. In order to apply this revenue recognition principle, the Company applies the following five step approach: (1) identify the contract with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5) recognize revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied. See Note 4, Revenue Recognition for further information.
Revenues disclosed for 2017 were accounted forrelating to point in accordance with Accounting Standard Codification ("ASC") Topic 605. Under this standard, revenue was primarilytime contracts are recognized when title and risk of loss have passed to the customer persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, no significant post-delivery obligations remain, the price to the buyers is fixed or determinable and collectionobtains control of the resulting receivableproduct, which is reasonably assured.
generally at the time of shipping. Revenues and costs on certain long-term capital contracts are recognized on the percentage-of-completion method measured on the basis of costs incurred to estimated total costs for each contract. This method is used because management considers it to be the best available measure of progress towards completion on these contracts. Revenues and costs on contracts are subject to changes in estimates throughout the duration of the contracts, and any required adjustments are made in the period in which a change in estimate becomes known. Estimated losses on contracts in progress are recognized in the period in which a loss becomes known. Unbilled receivables for net revenues recognized in excess of the amounts billed for active projects are recognized within other currentas contract assets on the balance sheet.
The Company provides for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon the recognition of the related revenue. Shipping and handling costs invoiced to customers are recorded as components of revenues and the associated costs are recorded as cost of revenues. We recognizeThe Company recognizes revenue net of sales returns, rebates, penalties, and discounts. Accounts receivable allowances include sales returns and bad debt allowances.the allowance for credit losses. The Company monitors and tracks the amount of product returns and reduces revenue at the time of shipment for the estimated amount of such future returns, based on historical experience.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The Company continuously monitors collections and payments from its customers and maintains a provision for estimated credit losses or doubtful accounts based upon expected losses, its historical experience, expectation of changes in risk of loss and any specific customer collection issues that it has identified. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when the Company believes it is probable the receivable will not be recovered.
The following table presents changes in the accounts receivables allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Additions (Reductions) | | | | |
| Description | | Balance at
Beginning of
Period | | Charged to
Costs
and Expenses | | Charged to
Other
Accounts | | Deductions
(1) | | Balance at
End
of Period |
| | |
| Year ended | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2022 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deducted from asset account: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 10,781 | | | $ | (813) | | | $ | (881) | | | $ | (832) | | | $ | 8,255 | |
| Year ended | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deducted from asset account: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 10,596 | | | $ | 1,213 | | | $ | (608) | | | $ | (420) | | | $ | 10,781 | |
| Year ended | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | | |
| Deducted from asset account: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Allowance for doubtful accounts | | $ | 3,948 | | | $ | 6,274 | | | $ | 999 | | | $ | (625) | | | $ | 10,596 | |
| (1) Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries. | | | | | | | | | | |
During 2021 the Company recorded a charge for allowance against contract assets of $4.4 million which is also the ending balance of allowance against contract assets as of December 31, 2021.
Goodwill
Goodwill is measured as the excess of the cost of acquisition over the sum of the amounts assigned to identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired less liabilities assumed. We performThe Company performs an impairment assessment for goodwill at the reporting unit level on an annual basis as of the end of ourits October month end or more frequently if circumstances warrant. OurIts annual impairment assessment requires a comparison of the fair value of each of ourits reporting units to the respective carrying value. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying value of a reporting unit is greater than its fair value, an impairment loss will be recognized in an amount equal to that excess, limited to the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Additionally, wethe Company will consider the income tax effect from any tax-deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the reporting unit when measuring the goodwill impairment loss.
Determining the fair value of a reporting unit is subjective and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions. With the assistance of an independent third-party appraisal firm, we estimatethe Company estimates the fair value of ourits reporting units using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. We believeIt believes this approach yields the most appropriate evidence of fair value. WeThe Company also utilizeutilizes the comparable company multiples method and market transaction fair value method to validate the fair value amount we obtainestimate using the income approach. The key assumptions utilized in ourits discounted cash flow model include ourincludes estimates of the rate of revenue growth including the rate of growth used in terminal year value, as well asand the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital. Any unfavorable material changes to these key assumptions could potentially impact ourits fair value determinations.
For additional information, see Note 10,9, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Cost of Revenues
Cost of revenues primarily reflects the costs of manufacturing and preparing products for sale and, to a much lesser extent, the costs of performing services. Cost of revenues is primarily comprised of the cost of materials, outside processing, inbound freight, production, direct labor and overhead including indirect labor, which are expenses that directly result from the level of production activity at a manufacturing site. Additional expenses that directly result from the level of production activity at a manufacturing site include purchasing and receiving costs, inspection costs, warehousing costs, internal transfer costs, utility expenses, property taxes, amortization of inventory step-up from revaluation at the date of acquisition, depreciation of production building and equipment assets, warranty costs, salaries and benefits paid to plant manufacturing management and maintenance supplies.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Where appropriate, standard cost systems are utilizedutilized for
purposes of determining cost; the standards are adjusted as necessary to ensure they approximate actual cost. Cost is generally determined on the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) basis. We The Company typically analyze ouranalyzes its inventory aging and projected future usage on a quarterly basis to assess the adequacy of ourits inventory valuation reserve, which primarily consists of obsolescence and net realizable value estimates. These estimates are measured either on an item-by-item basis or higher-level inventory grouping and determined based on the difference between the cost of the inventory and estimated net realizable value. The provision for inventory valuation reserves is a component of ourthe Company's cost of revenues. Assumptions about future demand are among the primary factors utilized to estimate marketnet realizable value. At the point of the loss recognition, a new, lower-cost basis for that inventory is established, and subsequent changes in facts and circumstances do not result in the restoration or increase in that newly established cost basis. Only subsequent inventory transactions via sale or disposal would then release the established inventory reserve.
If there were to be a sudden and significant decrease in demand for ourits products, significant price reductions, or a higher incidence of inventory obsolescence for any reason, including a change in technology or customer requirements, wethe Company could be required to increase ourits inventory valuation reserves, which could adversely affect ourits gross profits.
Business Acquisitions
We account for business combinations under the acquisition method, and accordingly, the assets and liabilities of the acquired businesses are recorded at their estimated fair value on the acquisition date with the excess of the purchase price over their estimated fair value recorded as goodwill. We determine acquisition related asset and liability fair values through established valuation techniques for industrial manufacturing companies and utilize third party valuation firms to assist in the valuation of certain tangible and intangible assets.
The definition of a business introduces a “screen test” that is a quantitative threshold for defining asset acquisitions. If substantially all of the acquisition is made up of one asset or several similar assets, then the acquisition is an asset acquisition. “Substantially all” is commonly considered to be approximately 90%. While it is not a bright line, if it meets or exceeds the threshold it’s an asset acquisition. Otherwise, the analysis must continue through the “full model.” This means that the structure of the transaction will be important in determining the accounting result.
The consideration for our acquisitions may include future payments that are contingent upon the occurrence of a particular event. For acquisitions that qualify as business combinations, we record an obligation for such contingent payments at fair value on the acquisition date. We estimate the fair value of contingent consideration obligations through valuation models that incorporate probability adjusted assumptions related to the achievement of the milestones and thus the likelihood of making related payments or by using a Monte Carlo simulation model. We revalue these contingent consideration obligations each reporting period. Changes in the fair value of our contingent consideration obligations are recognized within general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of income.
ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, provides guidance regarding business combinations and requires acquisition-date fair value measurement of identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree. For additional information, see Note 5, Business Acquisitions.
Legal Contingencies
We areThe Company is currently involved in various legal claims and legal proceedings, some of which may involve substantial dollar amounts. Periodically, we reviewthe Company reviews the status of each significant matter and assess ourassesses its potential financial exposure. If the potential loss from any claim or legal proceeding is considered probable and the amount can be estimated, we accrueit accrues a liability for the estimated loss. The determination of probability and the determination as to whether exposure can be reasonably estimated requires management estimates. Because of uncertainties related to these matters, accruals are based on the best information available at the time. As additional information becomes available, we reassessthe Company reassesses the potential liability related to ourits pending claims and litigation and may revise ourits estimates. Such revisions in the estimates of the potential liabilities could have a material adverse effect on ourits business, results of operations and financial position.
For more information see Note 17,16, Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees.
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Indefinite-lived intangible assets, such as trade names, are generally recorded and valued in connection with a business acquisition. For these assets, we performthe Company performs a qualitative assessment on an annual basis to determine if it is more likely than not the asset is impaired ("(“Step 0"0” test). These assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment as of the October month end, or more frequently if facts and circumstances warrant. For any that fail the Step 0 test, we performthe Company performs an impairment assessment at the asset level utilizing a fair value calculation. The Company has the option to bypass the qualitative assessment for an indefinite lived intangible asset in any period and proceed directly to the quantitative impairment test. Determining the fair value is subjective and requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions. With the assistance of an independent third-party appraisal firm, we estimatethe Company estimates the fair value using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. We noterelief from royalty method. The significant assumptions that are used to determine the estimated fair value of each individualfor indefinite-lived asset exceededintangible assets are forecasted revenue growth rates, the respective carrying amount,assumed royalty rates and no intangible impairments were recorded.the market-participant discount rates.
For more information see Note 10,9, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
Other Long-Lived Assets
In accordance with ASC Topic 360, Plant, Property, and Equipment, we performthe Company performs impairment analyses of long-lived asset groups whenever events and circumstances indicate impairment. If indicators are present, we performit performs a recoverability test by comparing the sum of the undiscounted future cash flows specific to the asset group to its carrying value. If the recoverability test fails (sum of undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset group's carrying value), weit then determinedetermines the fair value of the asset group and recognizerecognizes an impairment loss if the carrying value exceeds the calculatedestimated fair value.
For more information, see Note 9,8, Property, Plant and Equipment.
Post-Retirement Benefits
Pensions and other post-retirement benefit obligations and net periodic benefit costs are actuarially determined and are affected by several assumptions including the discount rate, mortality, and the expected long-term return on plan assets. Changes in assumptions and differences from actual results will affect the amounts of net periodic benefit cost recognized in future periods. These assumptions may also effect the amount and timing of future cash contributions.
As required in the recognition and disclosure provisions of ASC Topic 715, Compensation - Retirement Benefits, the Company recognizes the over-funded or under-funded status of defined benefit post-retirement plans in its balance sheet, measured as the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the benefit obligations (the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation for other post-retirement plans). The change in the funded status is the net of the recognized net periodic benefit cost, cash contributions to the trust/benefits paid directly by the Company and recognized changes in other comprehensive income. Other comprehensive income changes are due to new actuarial gains and losses, new plan amendments and the amortizations of amounts in the net periodic benefit cost.
Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses in excess of the 10% corridor (defined as the threshold above which gains or losses need to be amortized) are being recognized for all plans over the weighted average expected remaining service period of the employee group unless substantially all participants are inactive in which case the average remaining lifetime of covered participants is used. Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses arise from several factors including changes in the benefit obligations from actuarial experience and assumption changes, and fromas well as the difference between expected returns and actual returns on plan assets.
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if we anticipatethe Company anticipates that it is more likely than not that weit may not realize some or all of a deferred tax asset.
In accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, the Company initially recognizes the financial statement effect of a tax position when, based solely on its technical merits, it is more likely than not (a likelihood of greater than fifty percent) that the position will be sustained upon examination by the relevant taxing authority. Those tax positions failing to qualify for initial recognition are recognized in the first interim period in which they meet the more likely than not standard, are resolved through negotiation or litigation with the taxing authority, or upon expiration of the statute of limitations. De-
recognitionDe-recognition of a tax position that was previously recognized occurs when an entity subsequently determines that a tax position no longer meets the more likely than not threshold of being sustained.
If future results of operations exceed ourthe Company's current expectations, ourits existing tax valuation allowances may be adjusted, resulting in future tax benefits. Alternatively, if future results of operations are less than expected, future assessments may result in a determination that some or all of the deferred tax assets are not realizable. Consequently, wethe Company may need to establish additional tax valuation allowances for a portion or all of the gross deferred tax assets, which may have a material adverse effect on ourits results of operations.
Under ASC Topic 740,Income Taxes, only the portion of the liability that is expected to be paid within one year is classified as a current liability. As a result, liabilities expected to be resolved without the payment of cash (e.g., due to the expiration of the statute of limitations) or are not expected to be paid within one year are classified as non-current. It is the Company’s policy to record estimated interest and penalties as income tax expense, and tax credits as a reduction in income tax expense.
With respect to global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI"(“GILTI”), the Company has adopted a policy to account for this provision as a period cost. Also, the Company has adopted the impact of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Update ("ASU ") 2018-05 in our financial statements.
For additional information, see Note 11,10, Income Taxes.
Share-Based Compensation
Share-based compensation costs are based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, Accounting for Share Based Payments, and these costs are recognized over the requisite vesting period. The Black-Scholes option pricing model is used to estimate the fair value of each stock option at the date of grant. Black-Scholes utilizes assumptions related to volatility, the risk-free interest rate, the dividend yield and employee exercise behavior. Expected volatilities utilized in the model are based on the historic volatility of the Company’s stock price. The risk-free interest rate is derived from the U.S. Treasury Yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The model incorporates exercise and post-vesting forfeitureservice termination assumptions based on an analysis of historical data.
Market condition stock option awards include both a service period and a market performance vesting condition. The stock options vest if certain stock price targets are met based on the stock price closing at or above the target for 60 consecutive trading days. Vested options may be exercised 25% at the time of vesting, 50% one year from the date of vesting and 100% two years from the date of vesting. These market condition stock option awards are being expensed utilizing a graded method and are subject to forfeiture in the event of employment termination (whether voluntary or involuntary) prior to vesting. To the extent that the market conditions above (stock price targets) are not met, those options will not vest and will forfeit 5 years from the grant date. The Company used a Monte Carlo simulation option pricing model to value these option awards.
For additional information, see Note 14,13, Share-Based Compensation.
Assets Held for Sale
The Company classifies assets and liabilities (disposal groups) to be sold as held for sale in the period in which all of the following criteria are met: management, having the authority to approve the action, commits to a plan to sell the disposal group; the disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition subject to terms customary for sales of such disposal groups; an active program to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell the disposal group have been initiated; the sale of the disposal group is probable, and transfer of the disposal group is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year; the disposal group is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair value; and actions required to complete the plan indicate that it is unlikely that significant changes to the plan will be made or that the plan will be withdrawn.
The Company initially measures a disposal group that is classified as held for sale at the lower of its carrying value or fair value less any costs to sell. Any loss resulting from this measurement is recognized in the period in which the held for sale criteria are met. Conversely, gains are not recognized on the sale of a disposal group until the date of sale. The Company assesses the fair value of a disposal group, less any costs to sell, each reporting period it remains classified as held for sale and reports any subsequent changes as an adjustment to the carrying value of the disposal group, as long as the new carrying value does not exceed the carrying value of the disposal group at the time it was initially classified as held for sale.
Upon determining that a disposal group meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, the Company reports the assets and liabilities of the disposal group, if material, as separate line items on the consolidated statements of financial position.
Environmental Compliance and Remediation
Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to existing conditions caused by past operations, which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed. Expenditures that meet the criteria of "Regulated Operations"“Regulated Operations” are capitalized. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. In accordance with ASC Topic 450, Contingencies, estimated costs are based upon current laws and regulations, existing technology and the most probable method of remediation.
Foreign Currency and Foreign Currency Contracts
OurThe Company's international subsidiaries operate and report their financial results using local functional currencies. Accordingly, all assets liabilities, revenues, and costsliabilities of these subsidiariesoperations are translated into United States ("(“U.S."”) dollars using exchange rates in effect at the end of the relevant periods. Income statement accounts such as revenues and cost of revenues are translated at the average rate of exchange prevailing during the period. The resulting translation adjustments are presented as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income. We doloss. The Company does not provide for U.S. income taxes on foreign currency translation adjustments since we doit does not provide for such taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries.
The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations including foreign currency exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. TheFrom time to time the Company currently uses derivative instruments to manage foreign currency risk on certain
business transactions denominated in foreign currencies. To the extent the underlying transactions hedged are completed, these forward contracts do not subject usthe Company to significant risk from exchange rate movements because they offset gains and losses on the related foreign currency denominated transactions. These forward contracts do not qualify as hedging instruments and, therefore, do not qualify for fair value or cash flow hedge treatment. Any gains and losses on ourthe forward contracts are recognized as a component of other expense in ourits consolidated statements of income.operations.
The Company is subject to exchange rate adjustmentsrelated gains or losses resulting from foreign currency denominated transactions. OurIts net foreign exchange losses(gains) / (gains)losses recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 were $(0.4)$(2.2) million, $(1.7)$0.9 million, and $0.8$1.7 million, respectively and are included in other (income) expense in the consolidated statements of income.operations.
For additional information, see Note 13, Financing Arrangements.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the number of weighted average common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average common shares outstanding and assumes the conversion of all dilutive securities when the effects of such conversion would not be anti-dilutive.
Earnings per common share and the weighted average number of shares used to compute net earnings per common share, basic and assuming full dilution, are reconciled below (in thousands, except per share data):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| | Net Income | | Shares | | Per Share Amount | | Net Income | | Shares | | Per Share Amount | | Net Income | | Shares | | Per Share Amount |
| Basic EPS | $ | (133,935 | ) | | 19,903 |
| | $ | (6.73 | ) | | $ | (39,384 | ) | | 19,834 |
| | $ | (1.99 | ) | | $ | 11,789 |
| | 16,674 |
| | $ | 0.71 |
|
| Dilutive securities, principally common stock options | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 175 |
| | (0.01 | ) |
| Diluted EPS | $ | (133,935 | ) | | 19,903 |
| | $ | (6.73 | ) | | $ | (39,384 | ) | | 19,834 |
| | $ | (1.99 | ) | | $ | 11,789 |
| | 16,849 |
| | $ | 0.70 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| | Net
Income | | Shares | | Per Share
Amount | | Net
(Loss) | | Shares | | Per Share
Amount | | Net
(Loss) | | Shares | | Per Share
Amount |
| Basic EPS | $ | 19,388 | | | 20,350 | | | $ | 0.95 | | | $ | (61,638) | | | 20,201 | | | $ | (3.05) | | | $ | (218,614) | | | 19,982 | | | $ | (10.94) | |
| Dilutive securities, principally common stock awards | — | | | 77 | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Diluted EPS | $ | 19,388 | | | 20,427 | | | $ | 0.95 | | | $ | (61,638) | | | 20,201 | | | $ | (3.05) | | | $ | (218,614) | | | 19,982 | | | $ | (10.94) | |
Certain stock options to purchase common shares and restricted stock units ("RSUs"(“RSUs”) were anti-dilutive. There were 431,16543,515 anti-dilutive stock options, RSUs, and RSUs under our management stock purchase planRSU MSPs for the year ended December 31, 20192022 with exercise (grant) prices ranging from $26.84 to $60.99. There were 596,753 anti-dilutive stock options, RSUs and RSU MSPs for the year ended December 31, 2021 with exercise prices ranging from $33.63$32.76 to $71.56.$60.99. There were 1,041,454663,986 anti-dilutive stock options and RSUs for the year ended December 31, 20182020 with exercise prices ranging from $26.06$33.63 to $71.56. There were 252,001 anti-dilutive stock options and RSUs for the year ended December 31, 2017 with exercise prices ranging from $51.84 to $71.56.
As of December 31, 2019, there were 11,135 outstanding RSUs that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividend equivalents and are considered participating securities that are included in our computation of basic and fully diluted earnings per share.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
OurThe Company's cash equivalents are invested in time deposits of financial institutions. We haveinstitutions, and it has established guidelines relative to credit ratings, diversification and maturities that are intended to maintain safety and liquidity. Cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with maturity periods of three months or less when purchased. Restricted cash represents cash that is legally restricted as to withdrawal or usage.
Restricted Cash
Restricted cash represents cash that is legally restricted as to withdrawal or usage and includes amounts required to be maintained in relation to employment lawsbank guarantees in certain jurisdictions. Restricted cash is classified within prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
Other Assets
Other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets include deferred debt issuance costs associated with ourthe Company's revolving credit facility, tax receivable, non-current contract assets and other certain assets.
Fair Value
ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, defines fair value and includes a framework for measuring fair value and disclosing fair value measurements in financial statements. Fair value is a market-based measurement rather than an entity-specific measurement. The fair value hierarchy makes a distinction between assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and the reporting entity’s own assumptions (unobservable inputs). This hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows:
Level One: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.
Level Two: Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level Three: Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
Fair value information for those assets and liabilities, including their classification in the fair value hierarchy, is included in: Note 13,12, Financing Arrangements (for fair value of debt and interest- rate swaps) along with Derivative Financial Instruments, (for cross-currency hedges), and Note 16,15, Retirement Plans (for assets held in trust).
Certain pension plan asset investments are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share (or its equivalent) practical expedient (the “NAV”). The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables and trade payables approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these financial instruments. Cash equivalents are carried at cost which approximates fair value at the balance sheet date and is a Level 1 financial instrument.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is generally provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which typically range from 3 to 40 years for buildings and improvements, 1 to 10 years for manufacturing machinery and equipment, and 3 to 7 years for computer equipment and software. Motor vehicles and furniture and fixtures are typically depreciated over 5 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the lease term or estimated useful life of the asset. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
The Company reports depreciation of property, plant and equipment in cost of revenue and selling, general and administrative expenses based on the nature of the underlying assets. Depreciation primarily related to equipment used in the production of inventory is recorded in cost of revenue.revenues. Depreciation related to selling and administrative functions is reported in selling, general and administrative expenses.
See Note 9,8, Property, Plant and Equipment for additional information.
Research and Development
Research and development expenditures, including certain engineering costs, are expensed when incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses. Our researchResearch and development expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 were $7.7 million, $7.6 million, $8.5 million and $5.2$8.4 million, respectively.
Sale of Receivables
During the third quarter of 2019, theThe Company entered into ahas an active receivables purchasing agreement with a bank whereby the Company can sell selected account receivables and receive between 90% to 100% of the purchase price upfront, net of applicable discount fee, and the residual amount as the receivables are collected.
During the year,2022, the Company sold a total of $34.4$46.6 million in receivables under the program, receiving $46.2 million in cash of which $0.9 million related to prior year. The outstanding purchase price component of $1.1 million was recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2022. During 2021, the Company sold a total of $38.1 million in receivables under the program, receiving $32.2$38.0 million in cash.cash of which $0.8 million related to prior year. The outstanding purchase price component of $2.2$0.9 million was recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2019.2021.
New Accounting Standards
AdoptedChanges to U.S.GAAP are typically established by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") in the form of Accounting Standards Updates (ASUs") to the FASB's Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC"). The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs, and based on its assessment, determined that any recently issued or proposed ASUs not listed below are either not applicable to the Company or adoption will have minimal impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In September 2019, we elected to early-adoptMarch 2020, the FASB ASU 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwillissued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. This guidance contains optional expedients and Other (Topic 350): Simplifyingexceptions for applying GAAP to contract modifications, hedging relationships, and other areas or transactions that are impacted by reference rate reform (i.e., by the Test for Goodwill Impairment. This ASU simplifies how entities assess goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.transition of LIBOR and other interbank offered rates to alternative reference interest rates). The goodwill impairment test, as amended, will consist of one step comparing the fair value of a reporting unitnew standard was effective upon issuance and generally can be applied to its carrying amount.
On January 1, 2019, weapplicable contract modifications through December 31, 2022. The Company adopted the FASB ASU 2016-02, Leases, and all related amendments ("ASC Topic 842"), under the modified retrospective approach. Consequently, periods prior to January 1, 2019 are not restated for the adoption of ASC Topic 842. In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard which among other things, allowed us to carry forward the historical lease classification.
Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of additional Right-of-Use ("ROU") assets and lease liabilities of $10.7 million and $10.9 million, respectively, as of January 1, 2019. ROU assets represent our right2021, and intends to use an underlying asset forapply the lease term,provisions of this standard to contract modifications if and the lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. The difference between the additional lease assets and lease liabilities was recorded as an adjustment to deferred rent and prepaid rent. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated net earnings. See Note 7, Leases for further information.
On January 1, 2018, we adopted the FASB ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers and all the related amendments (“ASC Topic 606” or the “new revenue standard”) using the modified retrospective transition approach. The new revenue standard provides for a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and replaced most previously existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. We recognized the cumulative effect of adopting the new revenue standard as an adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. The comparative periods presented have not been restated and continue to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.
Not Yet Adopted
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which amends the impairment model by requiring entities to use a forward-looking approach based on expected losses rather than incurred losses to estimate credit losses on certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables. The ASU is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.
The Company will adopt the standard effective January 1, 2020 using a modified retrospective approach through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings.when applicable. The adoption of the standard isdid not expected to have a material impact on ourthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.statements..
(3) Discontinued Operations
During the second quarter of 2020, the Company completed the sale of its DV business to MS Valves GmbH for negative $8.3 million and Assets Helda working capital adjustment of negative $2.0 million at the time of closing. The transaction is subject to an earnout of 50% of net profit (only if positive) from closing through December 31, 2022. The Company had agreed to provide certain transition services for Salesix to twelve months, depending on the nature of the services. As part of transaction the Company retained certain supplier and lease liabilities and responsibility for shutting down DV’s Mexico manufacturing facility. The Company recognized a loss of $21.6 million in 2020 from the sale of DV, including costs to sell and working capital adjustments.
Discontinued Operations
During 2021, the Company continued to settle certain retained liabilities related to the sale of its DV business. During the third quarter of 2019, the Company instituted a strategic shift to exit the upstream oil and gas valves market to focus on more attractive end markets. In line with that shift, during the third quarter of 2019 the Company sold its EV business and classified its DV business as held for sale. These businesses were previously part of the Energy segment.
In accordance with ASC Topic 205-20, Presentation of Financial Statements - Discontinued Operations, the Company determined that the EV and DV businesses represented a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results. As a result, these businesses met the conditions for discontinued operations and are recorded as such in the consolidated financial statements. All prior period comparative financial information has been reclassified to conform to this presentation. We report financial results for discontinued operations separately from continuing operations in order to distinguish the financial impact of the disposal transactions from ongoing operations.
Upon classifying the DV business as held for sale, the Company was required to measure the disposal group at the lower of its carrying value or fair value less expected costs to sell. The Company calculated fair value of the DV business using an income
approach based on the present value of projected future cash flows. This approach incorporates several key assumptions which include the rate of revenue growth including the rate of growth used in the terminal year value, the projected operating margin, as well as the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital. Any unfavorable material changes to these key assumptions could potentially impact our fair value determinations. Through this process, the Company determined that the carrying value exceeded fair value and recognized a goodwill impairment of $6.9 million and an intangible asset impairment of $1.0 million. At December 31, 2019,2021, the Company recognized a valuation allowancegain of $39.8$2.7 million related to adjustan extinguished liability for the carrying valuelease settlement of the disposal group to its fair value less expected costs to sell.Mexico manufacturing facility.
The following table presents the summarized components of income (loss) income from discontinued operations, for the EV and DV businesses for the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended |
| | | | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| Net revenues | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 10,055 | |
| Cost of revenues | | | | | — | | | — | | | 26,399 | |
| Net loss | | | | | — | | | — | | | (16,344) | |
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | | | | | — | | | (84) | | | 9,074 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Special and restructuring charges, net (1) | | | | | — | | | 17 | | | 17,831 | |
| Operating income (loss) | | | | | — | | | 67 | | | (43,249) | |
| Other (income) expense: | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest (income), net | | | | | — | | | — | | | (14) | |
| Other (income) expense, net | | | | | — | | | (1,581) | | | 614 | |
| Total other (income) expense, net | | | | | — | | | (1,581) | | | 600 | |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, pre tax | | | | | — | | | 1,648 | | | (43,849) | |
| (Benefit from) provision for income taxes | | | | | — | | | 242 | | | (8,709) | |
| Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | 1,406 | | | $ | (35,140) | |
| (1) The year ended December 31, 2020, includes a loss on the sale of the DV business of $21.6 million. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Twelve Months Ended |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 |
| Net revenues | $ | 79,848 |
| | $ | 162,355 |
| | $ | 156,218 |
|
| Cost of revenues | 105,132 |
| | 145,908 |
| | 128,072 |
|
| Gross (loss) profit | (25,284 | ) | | 16,447 |
| | 28,146 |
|
| Selling, general and administrative expenses | 15,487 |
| | 23,786 |
| | 19,723 |
|
| Special and restructuring charges, net (1) | 85,603 |
| | 4,930 |
| | 4,162 |
|
| Operating (loss) income | (126,374 | ) | | (12,269 | ) | | 4,261 |
|
| Other (income) expense: | | | | | |
| Interest (income), net | (8 | ) | | (62 | ) | | (64 | ) |
| Other (income) expense, net | (378 | ) | | (9 | ) | | 1,852 |
|
| Total other (income) expense, net | (386 | ) | | (71 | ) | | 1,788 |
|
| (Loss) income from discontinued operations, pre tax | (125,988 | ) | | (12,198 | ) | | 2,473 |
|
| (Benefit from) provision for income tax | (16,821 | ) | | (6,161 | ) | | 1,535 |
|
| (Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax | $ | (109,167 | ) | | $ | (6,037 | ) | | $ | 938 |
|
| (1) For the year ended December 31, 2019, includes a valuation allowance of $39.8 million for the DV business, loss on sale of the EV business of $37.9 million, and goodwill and intangible asset impairments related to the DV business of $7.9 million. |
Assets Held for Sale
In addition to its businesses classified as discontinued operations, the Company has other disposal groups that meet the requirements of ASC 360-10 to be classified as held for sale in its consolidated balance sheets. In December 2019, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to dispose of its I&S business. The disposal group met the requirements to be classified as held for sale in the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019. In accordance with ASC 360-10, prior period results have not been restated to reflect the I&S business as held for sale.
In January 2019, the Company sold its RS business. This disposal group met the requirements for classification as held for sale in the Company's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018.
The following table presents the balance sheet information for assets and liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| | Discontinued Operations (1) | | Other Held for Sale (2) | | Total | | Discontinued Operations (1) | | Other Held for Sale (2) | | Total |
| Trade accounts receivable, net | $ | 467 |
| | $ | 9,935 |
| | $ | 10,402 |
| | $ | 16,371 |
| | $ | 12,341 |
| | $ | 28,712 |
|
| Inventories | 55,521 |
| | 13,878 |
| | 69,399 |
| | 73,696 |
| | 3,044 |
| | 76,740 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 2,867 |
| | 616 |
| | 3,483 |
| | 19,230 |
| | 1,602 |
| | 20,832 |
|
| Property, plant, and equipment, net | 6,742 |
| | 6,409 |
| | 13,151 |
| | 12,127 |
| | 12,542 |
| | 24,669 |
|
| Goodwill | — |
| | 91,492 |
| | 91,492 |
| | 8,600 |
| | 40,372 |
| | 48,972 |
|
| Intangibles | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 1,021 |
| | 17,209 |
| | 18,230 |
|
| Deferred tax asset | 778 |
| | 1,089 |
| | 1,867 |
| | 8,556 |
| | 824 |
| | 9,380 |
|
| Other assets | 4,793 |
| | 6,363 |
| | 11,156 |
| | 70 |
| | 7 |
| | 77 |
|
| Valuation adjustment on classification to assets held for sale | (39,757 | ) | | — |
| | (39,757 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Classified as current (3) | 31,411 |
| | 129,782 |
| | 161,193 |
| | 109,297 |
| | 87,941 |
| | 197,238 |
|
| Classified as noncurrent | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 30,374 |
| | — |
| | 30,374 |
|
| Total assets held for sale | $ | 31,411 |
| | $ | 129,782 |
| | $ | 161,193 |
| | $ | 139,671 |
| | $ | 87,941 |
| | $ | 227,612 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | $ | 8,708 |
| | $ | 5,997 |
| | $ | 14,705 |
| | $ | 29,166 |
| | $ | 3,370 |
| | $ | 32,536 |
|
| Accrued and other current liabilities | 5,834 |
| | 2,192 |
| | 8,026 |
| | 17,991 |
| | 5,576 |
| | 23,567 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 638 |
| | 151 |
| | 789 |
| | 325 |
| | — |
| | 325 |
|
| Other noncurrent liabilities | 13,931 |
| | 5,838 |
| | 19,769 |
| | 536 |
| | 2,195 |
| | 2,731 |
|
| Classified as current (3) | 29,111 |
| | 14,178 |
| | 43,289 |
| | 47,157 |
| | 11,141 |
| | 58,298 |
|
| Classified as noncurrent | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 861 |
| | — |
| | 861 |
|
| Total liabilities held for sale | $ | 29,111 |
| | $ | 14,178 |
| | $ | 43,289 |
| | $ | 48,018 |
| | $ | 11,141 |
| | $ | 59,159 |
|
| (1) Reflects the assets and liabilities of the DV disposal group at December 31, 2019, and the assets and liabilities of the DV and EV disposal groups at December 31, 2018. |
| (2) Reflects the assets and liabilities of disposal groups that did not meet the criteria to be classified as discontinued operations. At December 31, 2019, the balances consist of assets and liabilities of the I&S disposal group. At December 31, 2018, the balances consist of assets and liabilities related to the RS disposal group, along with a $4.5 million building that was actively being marketed for sale. The building was sold during 2019. |
| (3) The Company classified all assets and liabilities held for sale as current on the December 31, 2019 consolidated balance sheet because it is probable that these assets will be sold within one year. Similarly, the Company classified all assets and liabilities associated with RS disposal group and a building being marketed for sale as current on the December 31, 2018 consolidated balance sheet. For the assets and liabilities that were reclassified to discontinued operations as of December 31, 2018, the Company maintained the current and noncurrent classification from its historical consolidated balance sheet. |
(4) Revenue Recognition
OurThe Company’s revenue is derived from a variety of contracts. A significant portion of our revenues are from contracts associated with the design, development, manufacture or modification of highly engineered, complex and severe environment products with customers who are either in or service the energy, aerospace, defense and industrial markets. Our contractsContracts within the defense markets are primarily with U.S. military customers. OurThese contracts with the U.S. military customers typically are subject to the Federal Acquisition Regulations. We accountRegulations (“FAR”). The Company accounts for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable. Contracts may be modified to account for changes in contract specifications and requirements. Contract modifications exist when the modification either creates new, or changes the existing, enforceable rights and obligations. Contract modifications for goods or services that are not distinct from the existing contract are accounted for as if they were part of that existing contract. In these cases, the effect of the contract modification on the transaction price and the measure of progress for the performance obligation to which it relates, is recognized as an adjustment to revenue (either as an increase in or a reduction of revenue) on a cumulative catch-up basis, except when such modifications relate to a performance obligation which is a series of substantially the same distinct goods or services. If the modification relates to a performance obligation for a series of substantially the same distinct goods or services, the modifications are treated
prospectively. Contract modifications for goods or services that are considered distinct from the existing contract are accounted for as separate contracts.
Performance Obligations.Obligations
A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer, and is the unit of account in ASC Topic 606.account. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or as, control is transferred to the customer. Consistent with historical practice, we excludethe Company excludes from the transaction price amounts collected on behalf of third parties (e.g. taxes). Our performancePerformance obligations are typically satisfied at a point in time upon delivery and shipping and handling costs are treated as fulfillment costs. To determine the proper revenue recognition method for contracts for highly engineered, complex and severe environment products, with right of payment, which meet over-time revenue recognition criteria, we evaluatethe Company evaluates whether two or more contracts should be combined and accounted for as one single contract and whether the combined or single contract should be accounted for as more than one performance obligation. This evaluation requires significant judgment and the decision to combine a group of contracts or separate the combined or single contract into multiple performance obligations could change the amount of revenue and profit recorded in a given period. In certain instances, we accounted for contracts using the portfolio approach when the effect of accounting for a group of contracts or group of performance obligations would not differ materially from considering each contract or performance obligation separately. This determination requires the use of estimates and assumptions that reflect the size and composition of the portfolio. For most of ourthe Company’s over-time revenue recognition contracts, the customer contracts with usthe Company to provide custom products which serve a single project or capability (even if that single project results in the delivery of multiple products) with enforceable right ofto payment. In circumstances where each distinct product in the contract transfers to the customer over time and the same method would be used to measure the entity’s progress toward complete satisfaction of the performance obligation to transfer each unit to the customer, we wouldthe Company then applyapplies the series guidance to account for the multiple products as a single performance obligation. Hence,In certain instances, the entire contract is accounted for as one performance obligation. An example of these performance obligations include refinery valves or actuation components and sub-systems. Less commonly, however, weCompany may promise to provide distinct goods or services within the over-time revenue recognition contract, in which case we separatethe Company separates the contract into more than one performance obligation. For all contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocatethe Company allocates the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation using our best estimate of theestimated standalone selling price of each distinct good or service in the contract. Generally,contract when not directly observable. If at the contractually stated price isinception of the primary method used to estimate standalone selling price ascontract the period between the transfer of control of the good or service to the customer and when the customer pays for that good or service is sold separatelyless than a year the Company applies the practical expedient for significant financing component. Certain long-term contracts result in similar circumstancescontract assets for unbilled receivables or contract liabilities for customer advances or deposits. Such unbilled receivables or customer advances and to similar customers for a similar price and discountsdeposits are allocated proportionally to each performance obligation. The Company will not adjust the promised amount of consideration for the effects ofconsidered a significant financing component as we expect, at contract inception, that the period between when the transfer of control to our customers and whenbecause they are protective in nature for the customer fully paysor the Company.
Certain of the Company’s contracts give rise to variable consideration, including penalties.The Company includes in its contract estimates a reduction to revenue for customer agreements, primarily in the relatedlarge projects businesses, which contain late shipment penalty clauses whereby the Company is contractually obligated to pay consideration to customers if the Company does not meet specified shipment dates. Variable consideration is estimated using the most likely amount method or the expected value method depending on nature of the variability, and the method elected is consistently applied among performance obligations will be less than a year.with similar uncertainties.
The majority of ourFor revenue that is recognized over-time is related to our Refinery Valves business within our Energy segmentfrom products and certain other businesses that sell customized productsservices transferred to customers that serveover-time, the U.S. Department of Defense within our Aerospace & Defense segment and have contract provisions guaranteeing us costs and profit upon customer cancellation. Revenue is recognized over-time usingCompany uses an input measure (i.e.(e.g., costs incurred to date relative to total estimated costs at completion, known as the “cost-to-cost” method) to measure progress. We generally useThe Company uses the cost-to-cost measure of progress for our contracts because it best depicts the transfer of control to the customer which occurs as we incurit incurs costs on ourits contracts. Under the cost-to-cost measure of progress, revenues are recordedrevenue is recognized proportionally as costs are incurred. Contract costs include labor, materials and subcontractors’ costs, other direct costs and an allocation of overhead, as appropriate.
On December 31, 2019, we had $407.8 million of revenue related to remaining performance obligations. We expect to recognize approximately 83% of our remaining performance obligations as revenue during 2020, 12% in 2021, and 5% thereafter.
Contract Balances. The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections results in billed accounts receivable, unbilled receivables (contract assets), and customer advances and deposits (contract liabilities) on the consolidated balance sheet. Contract assets include unbilled amounts typically resulting from over-time contracts when the cost-to-cost method of revenue recognition is utilized and revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer, and right to payment is not just subject to the passage of time. Amounts may not exceed their net realizable value. Contract assets are generally classified as current. Generally, payment terms are based on shipment and billing occurs subsequent to revenue recognition, resulting in contract assets for over-time revenue recognition products. However, we sometimes receive advances or deposits from our customers, before revenue is recognized, resulting in contract liabilities. Contract liabilities are generally classified as current. These assets and liabilities are reported net on the consolidated balance sheet on a contract-by-contract basis at the end of each reporting period. Consistent with historical practice, we elected to expense the incremental costs of obtaining a contract when the amortization period for such contracts would have been one year or less.
In order to determine revenue recognized in the period from contract liabilities, we first allocate revenue to the individual contract liabilities balances outstanding at the beginning of the period until the revenue exceeds that balance. If additional
advances are received on those contracts in subsequent periods, we assume all revenue recognized in the reporting period first applies to the beginning contract liabilities as opposed to a portion applying to the new advances for the period.
The opening and closing balances of the Company’s contract assets and contract liabilities balances as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2019, respectively, are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 | Increase/(Decrease) |
| Trade accounts receivables, net | | $ | 125,422 |
| | $ | 167,181 |
| $ | (41,759 | ) |
| Contract assets (1) (2) | | $ | 52,781 |
| | $ | 46,912 |
| $ | 5,869 |
|
| Contract liabilities (3) (4) (5) | | $ | 35,007 |
| | $ | 41,951 |
| $ | (6,944 | ) |
| | | | | | |
(1) Recorded within prepaid expenses and other current assets.
|
| (2) Contract assets balance as of December 31, 2018 includes $0.4 million associated with the I&S business, which is classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019. |
| (3) Recorded within accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
| (4) Contract liabilities balance has been adjusted by $1.4 million associated with RS, which the Company divested during the first quarter of 2019. |
| (5) Contract liabilities balance as of December 31, 2018 includes $1.0 million associated with the I&S business, which is classified as held for sale as of December 31, 2019. |
The difference in the opening and closing balances of the contract assets and contract liabilities primarily result from the timing difference between the Company’s performance and the customer’s payment.
Trade account receivables, net decreased $(41.8) million, or (-25%), to $125.4 million as of December 31, 2019, primarily driven by the timing of cash collections during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019.
Contract assets increased $5.9 million, or (+13%), to $52.8 million, primarily related to unbilled revenue recognized during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 within our Defense businesses (+9%), North American Pumps business (+3%), and Refinery Valves business (+3%), partially offset by declines within our North American Valves business (-5%).
Contract liabilities decreased $(6.9) million, or (-17%), to $35.0 million, primarily driven by declines within our Refinery Valves business (-27%), partially offset by the timing of revenue recognition in our U.S. Defense business (+8%) and Fluid Control business (+3%).
Contract Estimates. Accounting for over-time contracts requires reliable estimates in order to estimate total contract revenue and costs.For these contracts, we have a Company-wide standard and disciplined quarterly Estimate at Completion ("EAC") process in which management reviews the progress and execution of ourthe Company's performance obligations. As part of this process, management reviews information including, but not limited to, any outstanding key contract matters, progress towards completion and the related program schedule, identified risks and opportunities and the related changes inobligations at least quarterly. Management estimates of revenues and costs. The risks and opportunities include management's judgment about the ability and cost to achieve the delivery schedule (e.g., the timing of shipments), technical requirements (e.g., a highly engineered product requiring sub-contractors) and other contract requirements. Management must make assumptions and estimates regarding labor productivity and availability, the complexity of the work to be performed, the availability of materials, the length of time to complete the performance obligation (e.g. to estimate increases in wages and prices for materials and related support cost allocations), execution by our subcontractors, the availability and timing of funding from our customer and overhead cost rates, among other variables. Based on all of these factors, we estimate the profit on a contract as the difference between the total estimated revenue and EACestimate at completion (“EAC”) costs and recognizerecognizes the resultant profit over the life of the contract, using the cost-to-cost EAC input method to measure progress toward complete satisfaction of a performance obligation.
The nature of our contracts gives rise to several types of variable consideration, including penalties. We include in our contract estimates a reduction to revenue for customer agreements, primarily in our large projects business, which contain late shipment penalty clauses whereby we are contractually obligated to pay consideration to our customers if we do not meet specified shipment dates. We generally estimate the variable consideration at the most likely amount to which the customer expects to be entitled. We include estimated amounts in the transaction price to the extent it is probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur when the uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved. The variable consideration for estimated penalties is based on several factors including historical customer
settlement experience, contractual penalty percentages, and facts surrounding the late shipment. Accruals related to these potential late shipment penalties as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 were $1.8 million and $2.0 million, respectively.
A change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of ourthe related contracts. We review and update our contract-related estimates regularly. We recognizeManagement recognizes adjustments in estimated profit on contracts under the cumulative catch-up method. Under this method, the impact of the adjustment on profit recorded to date is recognized in the period the adjustment is identified. Revenue and profit in future periods of contract performance is recognized using the adjusted estimate. If at any time the estimate of contract profitability indicates an anticipated loss on the contract, we recognize the total loss in the quarter it is identified.
The impact of adjustments in contract estimates on our operating earnings canmay be reflected in either operating expenses cost of revenues and/or revenue. There were no significant changes
On December 31, 2022, the Company had $236.7 million of transaction price related to remaining performance obligations. It expects to recognize approximately 66% of our remaining performance obligations as revenue during 2023, 26% in estimates2024, and 8% thereafter.
Contract Balances
Revenue on over time contracts is recognized as the Company, in accordance with the terms of the applicable contract, transfers control in the twelve monthsunderlying products or services to the customer, which occurs as it incurs costs on its contracts under the cost-to-cost measure of progress. The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections results in billed accounts receivable, unbilled receivables (contract assets), and customer advances and deposits (contract liabilities) on the consolidated balance sheet. Contract assets include unbilled amounts typically resulting from over-time contracts when revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer, and right to payment is not just subject to the passage of time. Expected credit losses are considered and allowances recorded where applicable, which result in the net amount expected to be collected. Generally, payment terms are based on milestones or shipment and billing occurs subsequent to revenue recognition, resulting in contract assets for over-time revenue recognition products. However, the Company sometimes receives advances or deposits from its customers, before revenue is recognized, resulting in contract liabilities. These assets and liabilities are reported net on the consolidated balance sheet on a contract-by-contract basis at the end of each reporting period. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are expensed when the amortization period for such contracts would have been one year or less.
In order to determine revenue recognized in the period from contract liabilities, the Company first allocates revenue to the individual contract liabilities balances outstanding at the beginning of the period until the revenue exceeds that balance. If additional advances are received on those contracts in subsequent periods, it assumes all revenue recognized in the reporting period first applies to the beginning contract liabilities as opposed to a portion applying to the new advances for the period. Revenue recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019.
The Company’s contract assets and contract liabilities as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 are as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | |
| | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | Increase/(Decrease) |
| Contract assets: | | | | | | |
| Recorded within prepaid expenses and other current assets | | $ | 98,406 | | | $ | 87,527 | | | $ | 10,879 | |
| Recorded within other non-current assets | | 7,677 | | | 6,336 | | | 1,341 | |
| Total | | $ | 106,083 | | | $ | 93,863 | | | $ | 12,220 | |
| | | | | | |
| Contract liabilities: | | | | | | |
| Recorded within accrued expenses and other current liabilities | | $ | 36,871 | | | $ | 26,870 | | | $ | 10,001 | |
| Recorded within other non-current liabilities | | 5,149 | | | 4,847 | | | 302 | |
| Total | | $ | 42,020 | | | $ | 31,717 | | | $ | 10,303 | |
Contract assets increased by $12.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to unbilled revenue recognized during the period for over-time revenue contracts within the Defense partially offset by decreases in Refinery Valves, Commercial and Other businesses and allowances against contract assets.
Contract liabilities increased by $10.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2022, primarily due to customer advances received in excess of revenue recognition in the Defense and Industrial businesses.
Disaggregation of Revenue.Revenue
The Company determined that disaggregating revenue into the categories shown in the table below meets the disclosure objective in ASC 606, Revenue from Contacts with Customers, which is to depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.
The following tables presents ourpresent the revenue disaggregated by major product line and geographical market (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended |
| Revenue by Major Product Line | | | | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| Industrial Segment | | | | | | | | | |
| Valves | | | | | $ | 183,997 | | | $ | 185,044 | | | $ | 199,715 | |
| Pumps | | | | | 320,207 | | | 321,082 | | | 299,494 | |
| Total | | | | | $ | 504,204 | | | $ | 506,126 | | | $ | 499,209 | |
| Aerospace & Defense Segment | | | | | | | | | |
| Commercial Aerospace & Other | | | | | $ | 125,492 | | | $ | 92,059 | | | $ | 90,835 | |
| Defense | | | | | 157,223 | | | 160,482 | | | 175,175 | |
| Total | | | | | 282,715 | | | 252,541 | | | 266,010 | |
| Net Revenue | | | | | $ | 786,919 | | | $ | 758,667 | | | $ | 765,219 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue by Major Product Line | | Twelve Months Ended |
| | | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Energy Segment | | | | |
| | Oil & Gas - Upstream, Midstream & Other | | $ | 54,818 |
| | $ | 67,738 |
|
| | Oil & Gas - Downstream | | 186,164 |
| | 221,139 |
|
| | Total | | 240,982 |
| | 288,877 |
|
| Aerospace & Defense Segment | | | | |
| | Commercial Aerospace & Other | | 124,023 |
| | 105,914 |
|
| | Defense | | 148,602 |
| | 131,103 |
|
| | Total | | 272,625 |
| | 237,017 |
|
| Industrial Segment | | | | |
| | Valves | | 113,386 |
| | 117,492 |
|
| | Pumps | | 337,320 |
| | 370,084 |
|
| | Total | | 450,706 |
| | 487,576 |
|
| Net Revenue | | $ | 964,313 |
| | $ | 1,013,470 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended |
| Revenue by Geographical Market | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| Industrial Segment | | | | | |
| Europe, Middle East, Africa, "EMEA" | $ | 202,063 | | | $ | 230,176 | | | $ | 217,853 | |
| North America | 177,728 | | | 146,307 | | | 170,301 | |
| Other | 124,413 | | | 129,643 | | | 111,055 | |
| Total | $ | 504,204 | | | $ | 506,126 | | | $ | 499,209 | |
| Aerospace & Defense Segment | | | | | |
| EMEA | $ | 67,320 | | | $ | 59,242 | | | $ | 61,726 | |
| North America | 195,190 | | | 179,589 | | | 188,817 | |
| Other | 20,205 | | | 13,710 | | | 15,467 | |
| Total | $ | 282,715 | | | $ | 252,541 | | | $ | 266,010 | |
| Net Revenue | $ | 786,919 | | | 758,667 | | | 765,219 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Revenue by Geographical Market | | Twelve Months Ended |
| | | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Energy Segment | | | | |
| | EMEA | | $ | 83,685 |
| | $ | 84,174 |
|
| | North America | | 118,061 |
| | 158,649 |
|
| | Other | | 39,236 |
| | 46,054 |
|
| | Total | | 240,982 |
| | 288,877 |
|
| Aerospace & Defense Segment | | | | |
| | EMEA | | 74,657 |
| | 65,634 |
|
| | North America | | 172,676 |
| | 148,968 |
|
| | Other | | 25,292 |
| | 22,415 |
|
| | Total | | 272,625 |
| | 237,017 |
|
| Industrial Segment | | | | |
| | EMEA | | 209,302 |
| | 238,177 |
|
| | North America | | 147,912 |
| | 151,147 |
|
| | Other | | 93,492 |
| | 98,252 |
|
| | Total | | 450,706 |
| | 487,576 |
|
| Net Revenue | | $ | 964,313 |
| | $ | 1,013,470 |
|
(5) Business Acquisitions
On September 24, 2017, CIRCOR entered into a Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with Colfax Corporation (“Colfax”). Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on December 11, 2017, the Company acquired the fluid handling business of Colfax ("FH") for consideration consisting of $542.0 million in cash, 3,283,424 unregistered shares of the Company's common stock, with a fair value of approximately $140.0 million at closing, and the assumption of net pension and post-retirement liabilities of FH. The Company financed the cash consideration through a combination of committed debt financing and cash on hand. During the second quarter of 2018, the shares were registered and sold with all proceeds going to Colfax.
FH is a leader in the engineering, development‚ manufacturing‚ distribution‚ service and support of fluid handling systems. With a history dating back to 1860‚ FH is a leading supplier of screw pumps for high demand, severe service applications across a range of markets including general industry, commercial marine, defense, and oil & gas. FH leverages differentiated technology, and provides critical aftermarket customer support, to maintain leading positions in high demand niche markets.
The operating results of FH have been split between each of our operating segments, Energy, Aerospace & Defense, and Industrial based upon the end markets of the sub-businesses within FH.
The purchase price allocation is based upon a valuation of assets and liabilities that was prepared with assistance from a third party valuation specialist. The purchase accounting was finalized in the fourth quarter of 2018.
During 2018, the Company paid Colfax approximately $2.6 million pursuant to a transition services agreement which facilitated the orderly separation of the FH business from Colfax. Colfax was a significant shareholder of the Company during the first six months of 2018.
The following table summarizes the acquisition date fair value of the assets acquired and the liabilities assumed:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | Preliminary Fair Value of Assets Acquired | | Measurement Period Adjustment | | Finalized Fair Value of Assets Acquired |
| Cash and cash equivalents (a) | $ | 63,403 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 63,403 |
|
| Restricted cash (a) | 1,911 |
| | — |
| | 1,911 |
|
| Accounts receivable | 77,970 |
| | (2,128 | ) | | 75,842 |
|
| Inventory | 79,329 |
| | (402 | ) | | 78,927 |
|
| Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 16,937 |
| | (1,348 | ) | | 15,589 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment | 115,891 |
| | 5,033 |
| | 120,924 |
|
| Identifiable intangible assets | 388,000 |
| | (3,000 | ) | | 385,000 |
|
| Other assets | 338 |
| | 586 |
| | 924 |
|
| Accounts payable | (46,045 | ) | | 20 |
| | (46,025 | ) |
| Cash payable to seller (a) | (65,314 | ) | | — |
| | (65,314 | ) |
| Accrued and other expenses | (63,115 | ) | | (9,273 | ) | | (72,388 | ) |
| Long-term post-retirement liabilities | (143,067 | ) | | 2,600 |
| | (140,467 | ) |
| Other long-term liabilities | (11,215 | ) | | — |
| | (11,215 | ) |
| Deferred tax liabilities | (4,479 | ) | | (10,366 | ) | | (14,845 | ) |
| Total identifiable net assets | 410,544 |
| | (18,278 | ) | | 392,266 |
|
| Goodwill | 293,344 |
| | 8,195 |
| | 301,539 |
|
| Total purchase price | $ | 703,888 |
| | $ | (10,083 | ) | | $ | 693,805 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Consideration | | | | | |
| Base purchase price | $ | 542,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 542,000 |
|
| Net working capital and other purchase accounting adjustments | 18,121 |
| | (6,300 | ) | | 11,821 |
|
| Common Stock | 143,767 |
| | (3,783 | ) | | 139,984 |
|
| Total | $ | 703,888 |
| | $ | (10,083 | ) | | $ | 693,805 |
|
| | | | | | |
| (a) Cash acquired and returned to seller by the second quarter of 2018, net of FX impact of $2.3 million and cash withheld to pay Colfax obligations to foreign taxing authorities of $1.8 million. |
As illustrated in the table above, during the measurement period we identified certain uncollectible account receivable balances, unsubstantiated prepaid and other assets, certain existence or valuation adjustments to inventory amounts, revised valuation of property, plant, and equipment from our third party specialists, revised valuation of intangibles from our third party specialists, and accrual adjustments primarily relating to a loss contract for which we needed to establish a liability in purchase accounting. Additionally, we settled customary working capital adjustments ($11.8 million) with Colfax.
The excess of purchase price paid over the fair value of FH's net assets was recorded to goodwill, which is primarily attributable to projected future profitable growth, market penetration, as well as an expanded customer base for the acquired businesses. As of December 31, 2019, approximately 65.5% of goodwill is projected to be deductible for income tax purposes.
The FH acquisition resulted in the preliminary identification of the following identifiable intangible assets (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Original Estimate | | Measurement Period Adjustment | | Fair Value | | Weighted average amortization period (in years) |
| Customer relationships | $ | 215,000 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 215,000 |
| | 19 |
| Acquired technologies | 107,000 |
| | 6,000 |
| | 113,000 |
| | 20 |
| Trade names | 44,000 |
| | (3,000 | ) | | 41,000 |
| | Indefinite-life |
| Backlog | 22,000 |
| | (6,000 | ) | | 16,000 |
| | 4 |
| Total intangible assets | $ | 388,000 |
| | $ | (3,000 | ) | | $ | 385,000 |
| | |
During the measurement period, with the help of third party specialists, we adjusted the fair value of the acquired FH intangibles based upon better information regarding discount rates, royalty rates, and more detailed business unit forecasts that was determinable at the time of acquisition. The revised fair value of acquired FH intangibles have been recorded against our FH opening balance sheet during 2018.
The fair value of the intangible assets was based on variations of the income approach, which estimates fair value based on the present value of cash flows that the assets are expected to generate. These approaches included the relief-from-royalty method and multi-period excess earnings method, depending on the intangible asset being valued. Customer relationships, backlog, and existing technology are amortized on a cash flow basis which reflects the economic benefit consumed. The trade name was assigned an indefinite life based on the Company’s intention to keep the trade names for an indefinite period of time. Refer to Note 10, Goodwill and Intangibles, net for future expected amortization to be recorded.
The results of operations of FH have been included in our consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date and reported within the Industrial segment, with the exception of the U.S. Defense business which is reported in the Aerospace & Defense segment and RS business which is reported in the Energy segment. As disclosed in Note 1, Description of Business, the RS business was sold in January 2019. The consolidated results for the year ended December 31, 2018 include $484.8 million of net revenue and $6.1 million operating loss. The results for the year ended December 31, 2017 include $36.5 million of net revenue and a $1.1 million operating loss.
The following unaudited pro forma information presents the combined results of operations as if the acquisition had been completed on January 1, 2017, the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period. The unaudited pro forma results include: (i) amortization associated with preliminary estimates for the acquired intangible assets; (ii) interest expense on borrowings in connection with the acquisition; (iii) the associated tax impact on these unaudited pro forma adjustments; and the transaction costs presented in the earliest period (2017).
The unaudited pro forma results do not reflect any cost saving synergies from operating efficiencies or the effect of the incremental costs incurred in integrating the two companies. Accordingly, these unaudited pro forma results are presented for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of what the actual results of operations of the combined company would have been if the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the period presented, nor are they indicative of future results of operations (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| (Unaudited) | Year ended December 31, |
| | 2017 |
| Net Revenues | $ | 942,760 |
|
| Net Income | $ | (6,475 | ) |
(6) Special and Restructuring (Recoveries) Charges, net
Special and Restructuring (Recoveries) Charges, net
Special and restructuring (recoveries) charges, net consist of restructuring costs (including costs to exit a product line or program) as well as certain special charges such as significant litigation settlements and other transactions (charges or recoveries) that are described below.below, as well as gain or loss on sale of businesses not classified as discontinued operations. All items described below are recorded in Special and restructuring (recoveries) charges, net on ourthe Company's consolidated statements of
(loss) income. operations. Certain other special and restructuring charges such as inventory related items may be recorded in cost of revenues given the nature of the item.
The table below (in thousands) summarizes the amounts recorded within the special and restructuring (recoveries) charges, net line item on the consolidated statements of (loss) incomeoperations for the periods endingyears ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 2017:2020 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Special and Restructuring (Recoveries) Charges, net |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Special (recoveries) charges, net | $ | (30,079) | | | $ | 20,038 | | | $ | (39,248) | |
| Restructuring charges, net | 11,066 | | | 4,234 | | | 4,945 | |
| Total special and restructuring (recoveries) charges, net | $ | (19,013) | | | $ | 24,272 | | | $ | (34,303) | |
| | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Special and Restructuring Charges, net |
| | for the year ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Special charges, net | $ | 17,686 |
| | $ | 13,061 |
| | $ | 7,330 |
|
| Restructuring charges, net | 5,186 |
| | 5,848 |
| | 2,559 |
|
| Total special and restructuring charges, net | $ | 22,872 |
| | $ | 18,909 |
| | $ | 9,889 |
|
Special (Recoveries) Charges, net
The table below (in thousands) outlines the special charges (recoveries), net recorded for the year endingended December 31, 2019:2022 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Special (Recoveries) Charges, net |
| | Year Ended December 31, 2022 |
| | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Corporate | |
Total |
| Pipeline Engineering investigation and restatement costs | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 7,040 | | | $ | 7,040 | |
| Gain on real estate sales | | (25,969) | | | (22,008) | | | — | | | (47,977) | |
| Incremental loss allowance | | — | | | 500 | | — | | | 500 | |
| Strategic alternatives evaluation | | — | | | — | | 2,987 | | | 2,987 | |
| Debt amendment charges | | — | | | — | | | 4,977 | | | 4,977 | |
| Other special charges | | — | | | 988 | | | 1,406 | | | $ | 2,394 | |
| Total special (recoveries) charges, net | | $ | (25,969) | | | $ | (20,520) | | | $ | 16,410 | | | $ | (30,079) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Special Charges (Recoveries), net |
| | for the year ended December 31, 2019 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Corporate | |
Total |
| Divestiture- related | $ | (5,868 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 9,938 |
| | $ | 1,881 |
| | $ | 5,951 |
|
| Professional fees to review and respond to an unsolicited tender offer to acquire the Company | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 7,345 |
| | 7,345 |
|
| Other cost savings initiatives | 2,520 |
| | — |
| | 78 |
| | 1,792 |
| | 4,390 |
|
| Total special charges, net | $ | (3,348 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | 10,016 |
| | $ | 11,018 |
| | $ | 17,686 |
|
Divestiture-related:
In September 2022, the Company recognized a gain on the sale of real estate of $26.0 million located at Corona, California within the Aerospace and Defense segment. On September 6, 2022, the Company entered into a five year operating lease on the Corona facility, at the market rate of buildings of similar size and location, with a five year option to renew. The Company recorded an initial $14.3 million of operating right of use asset and lease liabilities.
In June 2022, the Company recognized a gain on the sale of real estate of $22.0 million located at Walden, New York and Tampa, Florida within the Industrial segment. The Company recognized a gain of $6.4 million and $15.6 million on each building, respectively. On April 8, 2022, the Company entered into a five year operating lease on the Tampa facility, at the market rate of buildings of similar size and location, with a five year option to renew. The Company recorded an initial $9.3 million of operating right of use asset and lease liability.
Incremental loss allowance: The Company incurred special charges of $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, related to a contract assumed as part of the Fluid Handling acquisition. The charges relates to incremental loss allowance for a receivable, contract asset and sub-contractor claims.
Strategic alternatives evaluation: The Company incurred net special charges of $6.0$3.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019, primarily attributed2022, related to a gain on the saleevaluation of strategic alternatives for the RS business (in the Energy segment) and losses in the Industrial segment associated with the sale of our Spence and Nicholson product lines. Corporate costs include certain costs associated with these and other divestiture activity.Company.
Professional fees:Debt amendment charges: The Company incurred special charges of $7.3$5.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31. 2019, associated with31, 2022 related to the reviewamendments of its credit agreements. See Note 12, Financing Arrangements for amendment information.
Other special charges, net: During the twelve months ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized other special charges, net of $2.4 million. Other special charges, net within Corporate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2022 include a net $0.9 million for severance related to the former CEO, comprised of $1.7 million severance, partially offset by the accounting effects of forfeitures for certain unvested CEO stock based compensation awards. Additionally, for the twelve months ended, December 31, 2022 the Company incurred other special charges of $0.3 million at Corporate related to retention agreements and response$1.0 million within Industrial related to an unsolicited tender offer to acquire the Company.severance and contract termination costs, and other special charges.
The table below outlines the special charges (recoveries), net recorded for the year ended December 31, 2021 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Special Charges (Recoveries), net |
| | |
| | for the year ended December 31, 2021 |
| | Aerospace & Defense | | | Industrial | | Corporate | | Total |
| Cryo divestiture gain | | $ | — | | | | $ | (1,947) | | | $ | — | | | $ | (1,947) | |
| Heater & Control Valve divestiture charges | | — | | | | 3,459 | | | 407 | | | 3,866 | |
| Debt refinancing charge | | — | | | | — | | | 8,693 | | | 8,693 | |
| Incremental loss allowance | | — | | | | 7,943 | | | — | | | 7,943 | |
| Other special charges, net | | $ | 39 | | | | $ | 1,105 | | | $ | 339 | | | $ | 1,483 | |
| Total special charges (recoveries), net | | $ | 39 | | | | $ | 10,560 | | | $ | 9,439 | | | $ | 20,038 | |
Cryo divestiture: The Company recognized a net special recovery of $1.9 million from the sale of the Cryo business. The Company received cash proceeds of $7.2 million and recognized a pre-tax gain on sale of $1.9 million.
Heater & Control Valve divestiture: The Company recognized special charges of $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, related to the sale of the Heater and Control Valve businesses.
Debt refinancing charges: The Company incurred special charges of $8.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, related to the refinancing of the credit agreement.
Incremental loss allowance: The Company incurred special charges of $7.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, related to a contract assumed as part of the Fluid Handling acquisition. The charges relate to incremental loss allowance for a receivable, contract asset and sub-contractor claims.
Other special charges, net: The Company recognized special charges of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. Included in the $1.1 million charge recognized within the Industrial segment was a contingency indemnification to the buyer of a previously divested business. The Company also recognized charges of $0.3 million in Corporate associated with streamlining operations and reducing costs.
The table below outlines the special charges, net recorded for the year ending December 31, 2018:2020 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Special Charges (Recoveries), net |
| for the year ended December 31, 2020 |
| | Aerospace & Defense | | | Industrial | | Corporate | |
Total |
| Divestiture- related | | $ | — | | | | $ | (53,203) | | | $ | 46 | | | $ | (53,157) | |
| Professional fees to review and respond to an unsolicited tender offer to acquire the Company | | — | | | | — | | | 6,937 | | | 6,937 | |
| Amortization debt issuance costs | | — | | | | — | | | 3,541 | | | 3,541 | |
| Other cost savings initiatives | | 19 | | | | 371 | | | 3,041 | | | 3,431 | |
| Total special charges, net | | $ | 19 | | | | $ | (52,832) | | | $ | 13,565 | | | $ | (39,248) | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Special Charges, net |
| | for the year ended December 31, 2018 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Corporate | | Total |
| Brazil closure | $ | 921 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 921 |
|
| Acquisition and divestiture related charges | — |
| | — |
| | 1,888 |
| | 8,278 |
| | 10,166 |
|
| Other cost saving initiatives | 986 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 988 |
| | 1,974 |
|
| Total special charges, net | $ | 1,907 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,888 |
| | $ | 9,266 |
| | $ | 13,061 |
|
Brazil Closure: On November 3, 2015, our BoardDivestiture-related: The Company recovered net special recoveries of Directors approved$53.2 million for the closure and exit of our Brazil manufacturing operationsyear ended December 31, 2020 due to the economic realitiesgain on sale of the I&S business in Brazilthe Industrial segment.
Professional fees: The Company incurred special charges of $6.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, associated with milestones reached subsequent to its response to an unsolicited tender offer to acquire the Company in the prior year.
Amortization of debt issuance costs: During the first quarter of 2020, the Company amended its term loan agreement in place at that time. As part of this amendment, the Company accelerated amortization of $3.5 million in debt issuance costs.
Restructuring Charges, Net
The tables below outline the charges associated with restructuring actions recorded for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and the ongoing challenges with our only significant end customer, Petrobras.2020 (in thousands).
CIRCOR Brazil reported substantial operating losses every year since it was acquired in 2011 while the underlying market | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Restructuring Charges |
| | as of and for the year ended December 31, 2022 |
| | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Corporate | |
Total |
| Facility related expenses | | $ | 8 | | | $ | 9,664 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 9,672 | |
| Employee related expenses | | 15 | | | 986 | | | 393 | | | 1,394 | |
| Total restructuring charges, net | | $ | 23 | | | $ | 10,650 | | | $ | 393 | | | $ | 11,066 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | $ | 1,839 | |
| Total year to date charges, net (shown above) | | | | | | | | 11,066 | |
| Charges paid / settled, net | | | | | | | | (12,068) | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2022 | | | | | | | | $ | 837 | |
conditions and outlook deteriorated. In connection with the closure, we
The Company recorded $0.9restructuring charges of $11.1 million of charges within the Energy segment during the twelve months ended December 31, 2018, respectively, which relates to losses incurred subsequent to our closure of manufacturing operations during2022. Of the first quarter of 2016.
Acquisition and divestiture related charges: In November 2018, we sold our Rosscor (see Note 1) business for a nominal amount and recorded a $1.9$11.1 million loss on the transaction. Rosscor was part of the Industrial business. Corporate costs relate to (i) our December 2017 acquisition of FH from Colfax, comprised of internal costs and external professional fees to separate
the FH business from Colfax and integrate the FH business into CIRCOR and (ii) $2.2in total restructuring charges, $10.4 million of transaction costs related to the January 2019 saleexit of the RS business (see Note 1).
Pipeline Engineering business. The table below (in thousands) outlines the special charges (recoveries), net recorded for the year ending December 31, 2017: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Special Charges (Recoveries), net |
| | for the year ended December 31, 2017 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Corporate | |
Total |
| Acquisition and divestitures related charges | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 3,760 |
| | $ | 13,096 |
| | $ | 16,910 |
|
| Brazil closure | 879 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 879 |
|
| Contingent consideration revaluation | (12,200 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (12,200 | ) |
| California Legal Settlement | — |
| | 2,400 |
| | — |
| | 2,400 |
|
| Other cost saving initiatives | (329 | ) | | — |
| | (330 | ) | | (659 | ) |
| Total special charges, net | $ | (11,596 | ) | | $ | 6,160 |
| | $ | 12,766 |
| | $ | 7,330 |
|
Acquisition and divestiture related charges:
On December 11, 2017, we acquired FH. In connection with our acquisition, we recorded $13.1$10.4 million charge consists of $5.3 million in impairments, $0.6 million of acquisitiontermination benefits and $4.7 million of deconsolidation charges. Impairments of $5.3 million included $3.8 million related professional feesto the write downs of Property, Plant and debt extinguishment feesEquipment, Right of Use Assets and Intangibles, which is a level three fair value measurement based on the expected cash proceeds from dispositions of the assets. In addition, the Company recorded $1.5 million in charges for write downs of working capital accounts, including primarily $1.0 million for accounts receivables. Included in the Industrial employee related expenses is $0.6 million in severance and termination benefits related to the exit of the Pipeline Engineering business. Additionally, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017.
On July 7, 2017, we divested our French non-core aerospace build-to-print business within our Advanced Flow Solutions segment as part of our simplification strategy. We measured2022, the disposal group at its fair value less costs to sell, which was lower than its carrying value, and recorded a $3.8 million charge during the second quarter of 2017. Also, in connection with this disposition we recorded a $1.5Company recognized $0.2 million of severance included as a restructuring charge.
Brazil Closure: In connection withan incremental recovery on the closuresale of our Brazil manufacturing operations, we recorded $0.9 million ofPipeline Engineering assets within facility and other related charges within the Energy segment during the year ended December 31, 2017, which relates to losses incurred subsequent to our closure of manufacturing operations during the first quarter of 2016.
Contingent Consideration Revaluation: On October 12, 2016, we acquired Critical Flow Solutions ("CFS").(recoveries), net. The fair value of the earn-out decreased $12.2 million related to the CFS acquisition during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017. The change in fair value during the year ended December 31, 2017 was recorded as a recovery within the special and restructuring charges (recoveries) line on our consolidated statement of (loss) income. The actual achievement of the earn-out was zero and the earn-out period expired on September 30, 2017.
California Legal Settlement: We recorded a special charge of $2.4 million during the fourth quarter of 2017 related to settlement of a wage and hour claim in our California Aerospace business. The claim was settled on February 21, 2018. Refer to Note 17, Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees for additional disclosure.
Restructuring Charges, net
The tables below (in thousands) outline the charges (or any recoveries) associated with restructuring actions recorded for the year ending December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. A description of the restructuring actions is provided in the section titled "Restructuring Programs Summary" below.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Restructuring Charges (Recoveries), net |
| | as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | |
Total |
| Facility related expenses | $ | (1,785 | ) | | $ | 35 |
| | $ | 327 |
| | $ | (1,423 | ) |
| Employee related expenses | 604 |
| | 560 |
| | 5,445 |
| | 6,609 |
|
| Total restructuring charges, net | $ | (1,181 | ) | | $ | 595 |
| | $ | 5,772 |
| | $ | 5,186 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2018 | | | | | | | $ | 874 |
|
| Total year to date charges, net (shown above) | | | | | | | 5,186 |
|
| Charges paid / settled, net | | | | | | | (861 | ) |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | $ | 5,199 |
|
We expectCompany expects to make payment or settle the majority of the restructuring charges accrued as of December 31, 20192022, during the first halfremainder of 2020.2023.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Restructuring Charges (Recoveries), net |
| | as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | |
Total |
| Facility related expenses | $ | 854 |
| | $ | 190 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,044 |
|
| Employee related expenses | 2,807 |
| | 436 |
| | 1,561 |
| | 4,804 |
|
| Total restructuring charges, net | $ | 3,661 |
| | $ | 626 |
| | $ | 1,561 |
| | $ | 5,848 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | $ | 882 |
|
| Total year to date charges, net (shown above) | | | | | | | 5,848 |
|
| Charges paid / settled, net | | | | | | | (5,856 | ) |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2018 | | | | | |
| $ | 874 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Restructuring Charges (Recoveries), net |
| | as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Corporate | |
Total |
| Facility related expenses | $ | 85 |
| | $ | 443 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 528 |
|
| Employee related expenses | (31 | ) | | 2,062 |
| | — |
| | 2,031 |
|
| Total restructuring charges, net | $ | 54 |
| | $ | 2,505 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,559 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2016 | | | | | | | $ | 1,309 |
|
| Total year to date charges, net (shown above) | | | | | | | 2,559 |
|
| Charges paid / settled, net | | | | | | | (2,986 | ) |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2017 | | | | | | | $ | 882 |
|
73In addition, the Company recorded a charge of $2.8 million for write down of inventories related to the exit of the Pipeline Engineering business classified within cost of revenues on the condensed consolidated statements of operations.
Restructuring Programs Summary
As specific restructuring programs are announced,During the amounts associated with that particular action may betwelve months ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded in periods other than when announced to comply with the applicable accounting rules. For example, total cost associated with 2017 Actions (as discussed below) were recorded in 2017 and 2018. The amounts shown below reflect the total cost for that restructuring program.
During 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 we initiated certain restructuring activities, under which we continued to simplify our business ("2019 Actions", "2018 Actions", "2017 Actions", "2016 Actions", respectively). Under these restructurings, we reduced expenses, primarily through reductions in force and closing a number$0.4 million of smaller facilities. Chargesemployee related severance charges, not associated with the 2019 Actions andexit of the 2018 Actions were recorded during their respective years. Charges associated with the 2017 Actions and 2016 Actions were finalized in 2017.Pipeline Engineering business.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 Restructuring Charges (Recoveries), net as of December 31, 2019 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Total |
| Facility related expenses - incurred to date | $ | (1,785 | ) | | $ | 35 |
| | $ | 327 |
| | $ | (1,423 | ) |
| Employee related expenses - incurred to date | 604 |
| | 560 |
| | 5,445 |
| | 6,609 |
|
| Total restructuring related special charges - incurred to date | $ | (1,181 | ) | | $ | 595 |
| | $ | 5,772 |
| | $ | 5,186 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 Actions Restructuring Charges, net as of December 31, 2018 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Total |
| Facility related expenses - incurred to date | $ | 1,964 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,964 |
|
| Employee related expenses - incurred to date | 1,552 |
| | 382 |
| | 1,536 |
| | 3,470 |
|
| Total restructuring related special charges - incurred to date | $ | 3,516 |
| | $ | 382 |
| | $ | 1,536 |
| | $ | 5,434 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2017 Actions Restructuring Charges (Recoveries), net as of December 31, 2018 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Total |
| Facility related expenses - incurred to date | $ | — |
| | $ | 366 |
| | $ | 366 |
|
| Employee related expenses - incurred to date | 222 |
| | 1,892 |
| | 2,114 |
|
| Total restructuring related special charges - incurred to date | $ | 222 |
| | $ | 2,258 |
| | $ | 2,480 |
|
The 2017 Actions were finalized during 2017. There are no remaining cash payments for these actions.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2016 Actions Restructuring Charges (Recoveries), net as of December 31, 2018 |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Total |
| Facility related expenses - incurred to date | $ | (92 | ) | | $ | 94 |
| | $ | 2 |
|
| Employee related expenses - incurred to date | 1,080 |
| | 1,181 |
| | 2,261 |
|
| Total restructuring related special charges - incurred to date | $ | 988 |
| | $ | 1,275 |
| | $ | 2,263 |
|
(7) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Restructuring Charges |
| | as of and for the year ended December 31, 2021 |
| | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Corporate | |
Total |
| Facility related expenses | | $ | 181 | | | $ | 118 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 299 | |
| Employee related expenses | | 1,126 | | | 2,438 | | | 371 | | | 3,935 | |
| Total restructuring charges, net | | $ | 1,307 | | | $ | 2,556 | | | $ | 371 | | | $ | 4,234 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | $ | 1,512 | |
| Total year to date charges, net (shown above) | | | | | | | | 4,234 | |
| Charges paid / settled, net | | | | | | | | (3,907) | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2021 | | | | | | | | $ | 1,839 | |
The Company made payment or settled the majority of the restructuring charges accrued as of December 31, 2021 during 2022.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Restructuring Charges |
| | as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020 |
| | Aerospace & Defense | | | Industrial | | Corporate | |
Total |
| Facility related expenses | | $ | 18 | | | | $ | 246 | | | 1 | | | $ | 265 | |
| Employee related expenses | | 343 | | | | 3,822 | | | 515 | | | 4,680 | |
| Total restructuring charges, net | | $ | 361 | | | | $ | 4,068 | | | $ | 516 | | | $ | 4,945 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2019 | | | | | | | | | $ | 5,199 | |
| Total year to date charges, net (shown above) | | | | | | | | | 4,945 | |
| Charges paid / settled, net | | | | | | | | | (8,632) | |
| Accrued restructuring charges as of December 31, 2020 | | | | | | | | | $ | 1,512 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
The Company made payment or settled the majority of the restructuring charges accrued as of December 31, 2020 during 2021.
(6) Leases
We leaseThe Company leases certain office spaces, warehouses, vehicles and equipment.equipment under operating leases. Leases with an initial term of 12-months or less haveare not been capitalizedrecorded on the consolidated balance sheet. We recognizesheets. The Company recognizes lease expense associated withfor these short-term leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
For lease agreements entered into after the adoption of ASC Topic 842, we combineLeases, which was adopted on January 1, 2019, the Company combines lease and non-lease fixed components for real estate, vehicles and equipment leases. We doIt does not combine lease and non-lease components for information technology leases. Variable lease costs are not included within the measurement of the lease liability as they are
entirely variable or the difference between the portion captured within the lease liability and the actual cost will be expensed as incurred. Variable costs are contractually obligated and relate primarily to common area maintenance and taxes, which are not material to the financial statements.
We
The Company elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which allowed usit to carry forward the historical lease classification, not reassess if existing contracts are or contain leases, and not reassess indirect costs for existing leases.
We have It has elected not to recast the comparable periods and rather used the effective adoption date of the standard as the date of initial application.
Leases which contain a renewal option to extend an existing lease term, or a termination option to end a lease early are exercisable at our sole discretion. We evaluate such leases to determine if we are reasonably certain to exercise the option. The depreciable life of assets and leasehold improvements are limited by the expected lease term, unless there is a transfer of title or purchase option reasonably certain of exercise.
Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees.
In determining the present value of lease payments, we usethe Company uses the implicit borrowing rate in the lease, if available. In cases where a lease does not provide an implicit borrowing rate, we useit uses the incremental borrowing rate based on available information at the lease commencement date. As of December 31, 2019, 2022, none of ourits existing leases provided an implicit borrowing rate. We giveThe Company gives consideration to ourits debt issuances as well as publicly available data for instruments with similar characteristics when calculating ourits incremental borrowing rates. Additionally, we performit performs an entity-level financial assessment along with risk assessment by country or jurisdiction in the determination of ourthe incremental borrowing rate. We update ourIt updates its financial and risk assessments periodically. We reassessThe Company reassesses lease classification and / or remeasureremeasures the lease liability in the event of the following: changes in assessment of renewal, termination or purchase option based on triggering events within our control, change in amounts probable of being owed under a residual guarantee, or contingency resolution.
Certain leases include one or more options to renew or terminate a lease early. The consolidatedexercise of these options is at the Company’s sole discretion. There are currently no renewal periods included in any of the leases’ respective lease terms as they are not reasonably certain of being exercised. The Company does not have any material purchase options.
Certain of our lease agreements have rental payments that are adjusted periodically for inflation or that are based on usage. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Supplemental balance sheet impact at December 31, 2019information related to our leases is as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Assets | Operating | | Finance | Assets | Operating | | Finance | | Operating | | Finance |
| Gross ROU Assets (1) | $ | 21,116 |
| | $ | 3,527 |
| |
| Gross Right-of-Use Assets (1) | | Gross Right-of-Use Assets (1) | $ | 46,009 | | | $ | 5,600 | | | $ | 26,657 | | | $ | 5,461 | |
| Less: Accumulated Amortization | (3,492 | ) | | (338 | ) | Less: Accumulated Amortization | (8,571) | | | (547) | | | (9,605) | | | (1,374) | |
| Net ROU Assets | $ | 17,624 |
| | $ | 3,189 |
| |
| Net Right-of-Use Assets | | Net Right-of-Use Assets | $ | 37,438 | | | $ | 5,053 | | | $ | 17,052 | | | $ | 4,087 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Liabilities | Operating | | Finance | Liabilities | Operating | | Finance | | Operating | | Finance |
| Current (2) | $ | 3,042 |
| | $ | 504 |
| Current (2) | $ | 5,246 | | | $ | 856 | | | $ | 3,682 | | | $ | 867 | |
| Non-current (3) | 14,317 |
| | 2,744 |
| Non-current (3) | 34,218 | | | 4,262 | | | 14,471 | | | 3,243 | |
| Total Lease Liabilities | $ | 17,359 |
| | $ | 3,248 |
| Total Lease Liabilities | $ | 39,464 | | | $ | 5,118 | | | $ | 18,153 | | | $ | 4,110 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (1) Operating and finance ROU assets are included within other assets on the balance sheet. | |
| (2) The current portion of operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded within accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the balance sheet. | |
| (3) The non-current portion of operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded within other non-current liabilities on the balance sheet. | |
(1) Operating and Finance Right-of-Use assets are included within lease, right-of-use assets, net on the consolidated balance sheets. | | (1) Operating and Finance Right-of-Use assets are included within lease, right-of-use assets, net on the consolidated balance sheets. |
(2) The current portion of operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded within accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. | | (2) The current portion of operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded within accrued expenses and other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. |
(3) The non-current portion of operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded within long-term lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. | | (3) The non-current portion of operating and finance lease liabilities are recorded within long-term lease liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. |
112
The components of lease costs are as follows (in thousands): |
| | | | |
| | | Twelve Months Ended |
| Lease Costs | | December 31, 2019 |
| Operating lease cost (1) | | $ | 5,071 |
|
| | | |
| Finance lease cost | | |
| Amortization of leased assets (2) | | 251 |
|
| Interest on lease liabilities (3) | | 40 |
|
| Total finance lease costs | | 291 |
|
| Total lease cost | | $ | 5,362 |
|
| | | |
| (1) Operating lease costs are recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses or cost of revenue within the consolidated statements of (loss) income depending upon the nature of the underlying lease. |
| (2) Finance lease amortization costs are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statements of (loss) income. |
| (3) Finance lease interest costs are recorded in interest expense, net within the consolidated statements of (loss) income. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Year Ended |
| Lease Costs | | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| Operating lease cost (1) | | | $ | 7,060 | | | $ | 5,912 | | | $ | 6,794 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Finance lease cost | | | | | | | |
| Amortization of leased assets (2) | | | 866 | | | 611 | | | 568 | |
| Interest on lease liabilities (3) | | | 181 | | | 93 | | | 70 | |
| Total finance lease costs | | | 1,047 | | | 704 | | | 638 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Total lease cost | | | $ | 8,107 | | | $ | 6,616 | | | $ | 7,432 | |
| | | | | | | |
| (1) Operating lease costs are recorded within selling, general and administrative expenses or cost of revenues within the consolidated statements of operations depending upon the nature of the underlying lease. |
| (2) Finance lease amortization costs are recorded in cost of revenues, as well as selling, general and administrative expenses within the consolidated statements of operations. |
| (3) Finance lease interest costs are recorded in interest expense, net within the consolidated statements of operations. |
| | | | |
| | | | |
Short-term lease expense and variable lease cost for the twelve monthsyears ended December 31, 20192022, 2021, and 2020 were not significant.
The estimated future minimum lease payments only include obligations for which we arethe Company is reasonably certain toit will exercise ourits renewal option. Such future payments are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Maturity of Lease Liabilities | Operating | | Finance | | Total |
| 2020 | $ | 3,994 |
| | $ | 526 |
| | $ | 4,520 |
|
| 2021 | 3,338 |
| | 526 |
| | 3,864 |
|
| 2022 | 2,994 |
| | 515 |
| | 3,509 |
|
| 2023 | 2,272 |
| | 515 |
| | 2,787 |
|
| 2024 | 1,761 |
| | 499 |
| | 2,260 |
|
| After 2024 | 6,834 |
| | 942 |
| | 7,776 |
|
| Less: Interest | (3,834 | ) | | (275 | ) | | (4,109 | ) |
| Present value of lease liabilities | $ | 17,359 |
| | $ | 3,248 |
| | $ | 20,607 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Maturity of Lease Liabilities | Operating | | Finance | | Total |
| 2023 | $ | 7,881 | | | $ | 1,353 | | | $ | 9,234 | |
| 2024 | 7,387 | | | 1,346 | | | 8,733 | |
| 2025 | 6,285 | | | 1,330 | | | 7,615 | |
| 2026 | 5,817 | | | 1,273 | | | 7,090 | |
| 2027 | 5,028 | | | 828 | | | 5,856 | |
| After 2027 | 19,161 | | | — | | | 19,161 | |
| Less: Interest | (12,095) | | | (1,012) | | | (13,107) | |
| Total | $ | 39,464 | | | $ | 5,118 | | | $ | 44,582 | |
The weighted average remaining lease term and discount rates are as follows:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Lease Term and Discount Rate | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| Weighted average remaining lease term (years) | | | | | |
| Operating leases | 7.8 | | 5.9 | | 6.3 |
| Finance leases | 4.6 | | 5.6 | | 6.2 |
| Weighted average discount rate (percentage) | | | | | |
| Operating leases | 7.7 | % | | 4.5 | % | | 6.8 | % |
| Finance leases | 8.9 | % | | 2.0 | % | | 4.8 | % |
|
| | |
Lease Term and Discount Rate | December 31, 2019 |
|
Weighted average remaining lease term (years) | |
Operating leases | 6.7 |
|
Finance leases | 6.8 |
|
Weighted average discount rate (percentage) | |
Operating leases | 4.6 | % |
Finance leases | 2.0 | % |
113
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | |
| | Twelve Months Ended |
| Other Information | December 31, 2019 |
| Operating Activities | |
| Noncash lease expense on operating ROU assets | $ | (17,625 | ) |
| Amortization expense on finance ROU assets | 251 |
|
| Change in total operating lease liabilities | 17,359 |
|
| Principal paid on operating lease liabilities | (4,301 | ) |
| Total Operating Activities | $ | (4,316 | ) |
| Financing Activities | |
| Principal paid on finance lease liabilities | $ | (281 | ) |
| Supplemental | |
| Interest Paid on finance lease liabilities | $ | 40 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended |
| Other Information | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 | | December 31, 2020 |
| Operating Activities | | | | | |
| Noncash Right-of-Use assets arising from entering into new operating lease obligations | $ | 27,135 | | | $ | 303 | | | $ | 268 | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Cash paid for operating lease liabilities | 8,129 | | | 5,256 | | | 5,013 | |
| Total Operating Activities | $ | 35,264 | | | $ | 5,559 | | | $ | 5,281 | |
| Financing Activities | | | | | |
| Principal paid on finance lease liabilities | $ | (353) | | | $ | (654) | | | $ | (557) | |
| | | | | |
| Supplemental | | | | | |
| Interest paid on finance lease liabilities | $ | 181 | | | $ | 93 | | | $ | 70 | |
| | | | | |
As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company has not entered into any lease agreements with related parties.
(8)(7) Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Raw materials | $ | 59,431 | | | $ | 51,911 | |
| Work in process | 63,846 | | | 55,942 | |
| Finished goods | 16,509 | | | 15,490 | |
| Inventories | $ | 139,786 | | | $ | 123,343 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Raw materials | $ | 65,315 |
| | $ | 66,391 |
|
| Work in process | 53,891 |
| | 58,911 |
|
| Finished goods | 18,103 |
| | 18,380 |
|
| Inventories | $ | 137,309 |
| | $ | 143,682 |
|
WeThe Company regularly reviewreviews inventory quantities on hand and recordrecords a provision to write-down excess and obsolete inventory to its estimated net realizable value, if less than cost, based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand. Once our inventory value is written-down a new cost basis has been established. For 2019, 2018the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, and 2017, our2020, charges for acquisition inventory step-up amortization, excess and obsolete inventory and net realizable value reserves totaled $0.4$2.6 million, $7.7$3.4 million, and $7.2$4.3 million, respectively.
(9)(8) Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Land | $ | 31,136 |
| | $ | 32,189 |
|
| Buildings and improvements | 82,149 |
| | 82,728 |
|
| Manufacturing machinery and equipment | 126,942 |
| | 146,022 |
|
| Computer equipment and software | 35,536 |
| | 34,180 |
|
| Furniture and fixtures | 11,980 |
| | 22,928 |
|
| Vehicles | 584 |
| | 223 |
|
| Construction in progress | 12,597 |
| | 17,647 |
|
| Property, plant and equipment, at cost | 300,924 |
| | 335,917 |
|
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | (128,745 | ) | | (146,245 | ) |
| Property, plant and equipment, at cost, net | $ | 172,179 |
| | $ | 189,672 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Land | $ | 25,813 | | | $ | 31,377 | |
| Buildings and improvements | 60,000 | | | 84,846 | |
| Manufacturing machinery and equipment (1) | 133,921 | | | 127,692 | |
| Computer equipment and software | 37,773 | | | 39,111 | |
| Furniture and fixtures | 13,329 | | | 13,477 | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Vehicles | 753 | | | 797 | |
| Construction in progress (1) | 14,364 | | | 10,769 | |
| Property, plant and equipment, at cost | 285,953 | | | 308,069 | |
| Less: Accumulated depreciation | (144,812) | | | (153,608) | |
| Property, plant and equipment, net | $ | 141,141 | | | $ | 154,461 | |
| (1) For the period ended December 31, 2021, the Company recast $4.7 million from Construction in progress to Manufacturing machinery and equipment to conform with current period presentation. | | | |
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 20172020 was $22.0$19.7 million, $26.2$22.9 million, and $12.4$20.4 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the depreciation expense included $1.2 million, $1.6 million, and $1.5 million, respectively, related to assets classified as held for sale on our consolidated balance sheets.
Property, plant and equipment, net, at December 31, 2019 excludes $6.4 million related to I&S held for sale assets.
The Company recorded additions to property, plant and equipment of$1.2 $2.5 millionand $1.4$1.5 million in the years ended December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2018,2021, respectively, for which cash payments had not yet been made.
(10)(9) Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The following table shows goodwill by segment as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Consolidated
Total |
| Goodwill as of December 31, 2021 | | $ | 57,360 | | | $ | 65,546 | | | $ | 122,906 | |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| Currency translation adjustments | | 21 | | | (3,080) | | | (3,059) | |
| Goodwill as of December 31, 2022 | | $ | 57,381 | | | $ | 62,466 | | | $ | 119,847 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Consolidated Total |
| Goodwill as of December 31, 2018 | $ | 96,272 |
| | $ | 57,418 |
| | $ | 296,915 |
| | $ | 450,605 |
|
| Business divestiture | — |
| | — |
| | (85,474 | ) | | (85,474 | ) |
| Reclassification of Instrumentation & Sampling to assets held for sale | (91,492 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (91,492 | ) |
| Currency translation adjustments | (4,780 | ) | | (33 | ) | | 3,067 |
| | (1,746 | ) |
| Goodwill as of December 31, 2019 | $ | — |
| | $ | 57,385 |
| | $ | 214,508 |
| | $ | 271,893 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | | Consolidated
Total |
| Goodwill as of December 31, 2020 | | $ | 57,468 | | | $ | 79,455 | | | | $ | 136,923 | |
| Impairment | | — | | | (10,500) | | | | (10,500) | |
| Reclassification of Cryo to assets held for sale | | — | | | (755) | | | | (755) | |
| Currency translation adjustments | | (108) | | | (2,654) | | | | (2,762) | |
| Goodwill as of December 31, 2021 | | $ | 57,360 | | | $ | 65,546 | | | | $ | 122,906 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Energy | | Aerospace & Defense | | Industrial | | Consolidated Total |
| Goodwill as of December 31, 2017 | $ | 145,458 |
| | $ | 62,548 |
| | $ | 289,156 |
| | $ | 497,162 |
|
| Held for sale | (40,372 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (40,372 | ) |
| Measurement Period adjustments related to acquisitions | (4,742 | ) | | (5,046 | ) | | 17,984 |
| | 8,196 |
|
| Business divestiture | — |
| | — |
| | (3,394 | ) | | (3,394 | ) |
| Currency translation adjustments | (4,072 | ) | | (84 | ) | | (6,831 | ) | | (10,987 | ) |
| Goodwill as of December 31, 2018 | $ | 96,272 |
| | $ | 57,418 |
| | $ | 296,915 |
| | $ | 450,605 |
|
During
For the twelve monthsannual goodwill impairment assessment during the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company estimated the fair value of its reporting units, using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. The Company believes this approach was the best approximation of fair value of its reporting units and incorporates assumptions market participants would use in estimating the fair value of reporting units. The Company also utilized the implied market value method under the market approach to validate the fair value amount it obtained using a discounted cash flow model income approach which indicated a control premium. The key assumptions utilized in our discounted cash flow model included an estimated rate of revenue growth and the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital. The estimated fair values using a discounted cash flow model were reconciled to the value indicated by the market capitalization including an assessment of the implied control premium. The relevant inputs, estimates and assumptions used in the implied market value method included our market capitalization as of the end of October 2022, and selection of a control premium.
The Company also performed its annual impairment testing of indefinite-lived assets during the fourth quarter of 2022. This impairment evaluation was performed using the relief from royalty valuation method. Based on this analysis, the fair value of the indefinite-lived assets exceeded their carrying values and the assets were deemed to be not impaired. The Company believes its procedures for estimating fair value were reasonable and consistent with market conditions at the time of estimation.
As part of the 2022 annual impairment assessment, the Company determined that the fair value for the RV reporting unit was less than its carrying value. While the RV reporting unit had no goodwill as of the date of the assessment, the Company determined this was an impairment indicator, and performed an impairment assessment of the asset group using an undiscounted cash flow model. The Company concluded that there was no impairment related to RV asset group for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022.
As part of its annual goodwill impairment assessment during the fourth quarter of 2021, the Company reassessed the aggregation criteria for its reporting units and determined that the Refinery Valves component in the Industrial segment no longer satisfied criteria for aggregation with the Industrial reporting unit and was identified as a separate reporting unit. Accordingly, goodwill of the previously aggregated Industrial reporting unit was reassigned on a relative fair value basis between the Refinery Valves and Industrial reporting units. The reassignment resulted in $10.5 million of goodwill reassigned from the aggregated Industrial reporting unit to the Refinery Valves reporting unit. The Company performed its goodwill impairment assessment immediately before and after the change in reporting units, on the aggregated Industrial reporting unit and disaggregated Refinery Values and Industrial reporting units.
The fair value of the aggregated and disaggregated Industrial reporting unit immediately prior to and following the change in reporting units, exceeded its carrying value and its goodwill was not impaired. The fair value of the Refinery Valves reporting unit was less than its carrying value in 2021. The Company recorded goodwill impairmentsimpairment charge of $8.6 million relatedall of the Refinery Valves reporting unit goodwill in the amount of $10.5 million. The Refinery Valves long-lived asset group was not impaired and did not suffer a decline in utility requiring a reassessment of the long-lived assets in the asset group.
The fair value of the Aerospace & Defense reporting unit exceeded its carrying value and its goodwill was not impaired.
At March 29, 2020, the Company reorganized its reporting units (see Note 18, Business Segment and Geographical Information) and had its stock price drop below book value, which the Company determined were triggering events requiring an assessment of its goodwill and indefinite-lived trade names. The Company's asset groups did not experience a triggering event, and its long-lived assets did not suffer a decline in utility requiring a reassessment of their useful lives. Through its assessment, management determined that its long-lived assets other than goodwill were not impaired.
For the assessment of goodwill as of March 29, 2020, the Company estimated the fair value of its two reporting units, Industrial and Aerospace & Defense, using an income approach based on the present value of future cash flows. The Company also utilized the implied market value method under the market approach to validate the fair value amount it obtained using a discounted cash flow model income approach which indicated a control premium. Management believes this approach was the best approximation of fair value of its reporting units given the environment and considering the uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The key assumptions utilized in discounted cash flow model included an estimated rate of revenue growth and the discount rate based on a weighted average cost of capital. The estimated fair values using a discounted cash flow model were reconciled to the discontinued businesses. These amounts are excluded fromvalue indicated by the tables above which representsmarket capitalization including an assessment of the implied control premium. The relevant inputs, estimates and assumptions used in the implied market value method included our market capitalization as of March 29, 2020, and selection of a control premium.
Based on the impairment assessment as of March 29, 2020, the Company determined that goodwill activity for continuing operations. Noin the Industrial reporting unit had been impaired and, accordingly, resulted in a goodwill impairments were recorded related to continuing operationsimpairment charge of $138.1 million during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 or 2018. Historical accumulated goodwill impairments were immaterial.first quarter of 2020.
Goodwill impairment was measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using future discounted cash flows and other observable inputs (Level 3).
The tables below present gross intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 |
| | Gross Carrying
Amount | | | | | | | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net Carrying Value |
| Patents | $ | 5,368 | | | | | | | | | $ | (5,368) | | | $ | — | |
| Customer relationships | 285,910 | | | | | | | | | (151,258) | | | 134,652 | |
| Acquired technology | 132,601 | | | | | | | | | (82,898) | | | 49,703 | |
| Total Amortized Assets | $ | 423,879 | | | | | | | | | $ | (239,524) | | | $ | 184,355 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Non-amortized intangibles (primarily trademarks and trade names) | $ | 71,983 | | | | | | | | | $ | — | | | $ | 71,983 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Carrying Value of Intangible assets | | | | | | | | | | | $ | 256,338 | |
| | | | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2021 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Value | | Gross Carrying
Amount | | Accumulated
Amortization | | Net Carrying Value |
| Patents | $ | 5,368 |
| | $ | (5,368 | ) | | $ | — |
| Patents | $ | 5,368 | | | $ | (5,368) | | | $ | — | |
| Customer relationships | 300,284 |
| | (83,411 | ) | | 216,873 |
| Customer relationships | 302,358 | | | (137,861) | | | 164,497 | |
| Order backlog | 22,789 |
| | (20,517 | ) | | 2,272 |
| |
| | Acquired technology | 134,731 |
| | (43,890 | ) | | 90,841 |
| Acquired technology | 135,972 | | | (72,708) | | | 63,264 | |
| Other | 341 |
| | (341 | ) | | — |
| |
| Total Amortized Assets | $ | 463,513 |
|
| $ | (153,527 | ) |
| $ | 309,986 |
| Total Amortized Assets | $ | 443,698 | | | $ | (215,937) | | | $ | 227,761 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Non-amortized intangibles (primarily trademarks and trade names) | $ | 75,556 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 75,556 |
| Non-amortized intangibles (primarily trademarks and trade names) | $ | 75,715 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 75,715 | |
| | | | | | | | |
| Net Carrying Value of Intangible assets |
|
| |
|
| | $ | 385,542 |
| Net Carrying Value of Intangible assets | | $ | 303,476 | |
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2018 |
| | Gross Carrying Amount | | Accumulated Amortization | | Net Carrying Value |
| Patents | $ | 5,399 |
| | $ | (5,399 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Customer relationships | 305,866 |
| | (56,133 | ) | | 249,733 |
|
| Order backlog | 23,354 |
| | (18,746 | ) | | 4,608 |
|
| Acquired technology | 133,247 |
| | (23,883 | ) | | 109,364 |
|
| Other | 4,599 |
| | (4,195 | ) | | 404 |
|
| Total Amortized Assets | $ | 472,465 |
| | $ | (108,356 | ) | | $ | 364,109 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Non-amortized intangibles (primarily trademarks and trade names) | $ | 76,172 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 76,172 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Net Carrying Value of Intangible assets | | | | | $ | 440,281 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets was $36.3 million, $42.3 million and $43.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
The table below presents estimated future amortization expense for intangible assets recorded as of December 31, 20192022 (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | After 2027 |
| Estimated amortization expense | $ | 31,320 | | | $ | 27,512 | | | $ | 24,018 | | | $ | 20,890 | | | $ | 16,716 | | | $ | 63,899 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | After 2025 |
| Estimated amortization expense | $ | 43,251 |
| | $ | 41,314 |
| | $ | 36,310 |
| | $ | 31,839 |
| | $ | 27,982 |
| | $ | 129,290 |
|
The annualFor the year ended December 31, 2022 the Company recorded $1.6 million of trade name impairment testingrelated to the exit of our non-amortized intangible assetsPipeline Engineering business. No goodwill impairment was completed as of October 27, 2019 and consisted of a comparison of the fair value of the intangible assets with carrying amounts. NaN impairments of our non-amortized intangible assets were recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019.2022.
(11)(10) Income Taxes
The significant components of our deferred income tax liabilities and assets were as follows (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Deferred income tax (liabilities): | | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Fixed Assets | (9,390) | | | (12,315) | |
| Intangible Assets | (32,839) | | | (41,425) | |
| Right of Use Lease | (9,461) | | | (3,175) | |
| Other | (5,030) | | | (3,957) | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| Total deferred income tax liabilities | (56,720) | | | (60,872) | |
| Deferred income tax assets: | | | |
| Accrued Expenses | 5,184 | | | 4,937 | |
| Bad Debt | 2,217 | | | 2,375 | |
| Equity Compensation | 869 | | | 3,191 | |
| Right of Use Lease | 9,941 | | | 3,457 | |
| R&D Capitalization | 5,014 | | | — | |
| Inventory | 4,342 | | | 4,768 | |
| Other | 4,037 | | | 6,804 | |
| Net operating loss and credit carry-forward | 81,849 | | | 96,511 | |
| Pension | 14,018 | | | 23,727 | |
| Interest | 31,404 | | | 22,329 | |
| Goodwill | 7,506 | | | 10,813 | |
| Total deferred income tax assets | 166,381 | | | 178,912 | |
| Valuation allowance | (127,387) | | | (139,005) | |
| Deferred income tax asset, net of valuation allowance | 38,994 | | | 39,907 | |
| Deferred income tax liability | $ | (17,726) | | | $ | (20,965) | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Deferred income tax (liabilities): | | | |
| Accrued expenses | $ | (971 | ) | | $ | — |
|
| Bad Debt | (260 | ) | | — |
|
| Fixed Assets | (14,044 | ) | | (6,343 | ) |
| Intangible Assets | (54,032 | ) | | (73,558 | ) |
| Inventory | (1,121 | ) | | — |
|
| Other | (697 | ) | | 151 |
|
| Pension | (210 | ) | | — |
|
| Total deferred income tax liabilities | (71,335 | ) | | (79,750 | ) |
| Deferred income tax assets: | | | |
| Accrued expenses | 5,202 |
| | 15,153 |
|
| Bad Debt | 2,247 |
| | (2,069 | ) |
| Equity Compensation | 3,373 |
| | 4,760 |
|
| Intangible Assets | 4 |
| | — |
|
| Inventory | 7,439 |
| | 4,696 |
|
| Other | 11,510 |
| | 307 |
|
| Net operating loss and credit carry-forward | 23,124 |
| | 26,298 |
|
| Pension | 32,901 |
| | 29,400 |
|
| Interest | 9,836 |
| | 5,067 |
|
| Total deferred income tax assets | 95,636 |
| | 83,612 |
|
| Valuation allowance | (14,303 | ) | | (17,562 | ) |
| Deferred income tax asset, net of valuation allowance | 81,333 |
| | 66,050 |
|
| Deferred income tax (liability)/asset, net | $ | 9,998 |
| | $ | (13,700 | ) |
The (benefit from) provision for income taxes is based on the following pre-tax (loss) income (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 | | |
| Domestic | $ | (26,430) | | | $ | (55,752) | | | $ | (168,988) | | | |
| Foreign | 50,097 | | | (2,110) | | | 41,416 | | | |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 23,667 | | | $ | (57,862) | | | $ | (127,572) | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Domestic | $ | (45,209 | ) | | $ | (71,059 | ) | | $ | (4,406 | ) |
| Foreign | 35,117 |
| | 47,163 |
| | 8,046 |
|
| (Loss) income before income taxes | $ | (10,092 | ) | | $ | (23,896 | ) | | $ | 3,640 |
|
The provision for income taxes consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
| 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Current provision: | | | | | |
| Federal - U.S. | $ | 253 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 165 | |
| Foreign | 7,233 | | | 7,942 | | | 8,415 | |
| State -U.S. | 502 | | | 232 | | | 548 | |
| Total current provision | $ | 7,988 | | | $ | 8,174 | | | $ | 9,128 | |
| Deferred expense (benefit): | | | | | |
| Federal - U.S. | $ | (2,070) | | | $ | 130 | | | $ | 39,293 | |
| Foreign | (1,371) | | | (3,052) | | | 5,033 | |
| State -U.S. | (268) | | | (70) | | | 2,448 | |
| Total expense (benefit) deferred | (3,709) | | | (2,992) | | | 46,774 | |
| Total provision for income taxes | $ | 4,279 | | | $ | 5,182 | | | $ | 55,902 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Current provision: | | | | | |
| Federal - U.S. | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (447 | ) |
| Foreign | 17,522 |
| | 11,583 |
| | 4,586 |
|
| State -U.S. | 594 |
| | 235 |
| | 442 |
|
| Total current | $ | 18,116 |
| | $ | 11,818 |
| | $ | 4,581 |
|
| Deferred provision (benefit): | | | | | |
| Federal - U.S. | $ | 8,414 |
| | $ | 621 |
| | $ | (6,764 | ) |
| Foreign | (11,768 | ) | | (1,323 | ) | | (4,640 | ) |
| State -U.S. | (86 | ) | | (1,665 | ) | | (388 | ) |
| Total (benefit) deferred | (3,440 | ) | | (2,367 | ) | | (11,792 | ) |
| Total (benefit) provision for income taxes | $ | 14,676 |
| | $ | 9,451 |
| | $ | (7,211 | ) |
Actual income taxes reported from operations were different from those that would have been computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate to (loss) income before income taxes. The expense for income taxes differed from the U.S. statutory rate due to the following:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Expected federal income tax rate | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % |
| State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit | (10.3) | | | (0.3) | | | (2.1) | |
| Impairment | — | | | — | | | (6.5) | |
| U.S. permanent differences | 2.3 | | | (1.7) | | | — | |
| Foreign tax rate differential | (4.8) | | | 3.7 | | | 2.8 | |
| Maturity of Interest Rate Swap | (10.7) | | | — | | | — | |
| Tax reserve | (1.5) | | | (2.6) | | | (0.6) | |
| Rate Change | — | | | (1.7) | | | (0.1) | |
| GILTI | 5.3 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Prior period adjustment | 6.2 | | | 0.2 | | | 1.4 | |
| Dispositions | — | | | (1.0) | | | (0.7) | |
| Valuation Allowance | 11.9 | | | (24.7) | | | (59.1) | |
| | | | | |
| Other, net | 1.3 | | | (5.2) | | | 0.3 | |
| Equity compensation | 0.6 | | | 2.0 | | | (0.3) | |
| Research and development | (3.2) | | | 1.3 | | | — | |
| Effective tax rate | 18.1 | % | | (9.0) | % | | (43.8) | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Expected federal income tax rate | 21.0 | % | | 21.0 | % | | 35.0 | % |
| State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit | 15.5 |
| | 3.8 |
| | (5.7 | ) |
| US permanent differences | (1.6 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | 22.7 |
|
| Foreign tax rate differential and credits | (26.0 | ) | | (7.6 | ) | | (66.4 | ) |
| Unbenefited foreign losses | (0.5 | ) | | (5.5 | ) | | — |
|
| Tax reserve | (0.3 | ) | | 1.3 |
| | (27.0 | ) |
| Rate Change | 5.9 |
| | — |
| | (13.9 | ) |
| GILTI | (3.9 | ) | | (20.7 | ) | | — |
|
| Intercompany financing | 30.4 |
| | 12.7 |
| | (17.8 | ) |
| Foreign tax credit writeoff | — |
| | (45.6 | ) | | — |
|
| Foreign-derived intangible income ("FDII") | 10.7 |
| | 0.1 |
| | — |
|
| Prior period adjustment | 44.1 |
| | 4.3 |
| | (0.6 | ) |
| Dispositions | (227.0 | ) | | — |
| | 4.7 |
|
| Other, net | (16.0 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | 3.9 |
|
| Equity compensation | (10.8 | ) | | (4.2 | ) | | (2.7 | ) |
| Release of contingent consideration | — |
| | — |
| | (113.9 | ) |
| Research and development | 13.1 |
| | 2.7 |
| | (14.0 | ) |
| Effective tax rate | (145.4 | )% | | (39.5 | )% | | (195.7 | )% |
ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires a valuation allowance to reduce deferred tax assets ("DTAs") if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The weight given to the potential effect of negative and positive evidence should be commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. The more negative evidence that exists, (a) the more positive evidence is necessary and (b) the more difficult it is to support a conclusion that a valuation allowance is not needed for some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset. Should there be a cumulative loss in recent years it is considered a significant piece of negative evidence that is difficult to overcome in assessing the need for a valuation allowance.
The Company recognized a valuation allowance for the German and the U.S. net DTAs to the extent of reversing DTLs during the year ended December 31, 2020. The Company continued to maintain a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets in Germany and the U.S. as both jurisdictions remain in a cumulative three year loss position at December 31, 2022. The Company concluded that the negative evidence associated with the history of losses outweighed any positive evidence as of December 31, 2022. Therefore, the Company has not relied on projections of future taxable income in our assessment of the realization of deferred tax assets at December 31, 2022. The Company calculated the valuation allowance based on the reversal of temporary differences. The Company maintained a valuation allowance related to the German deferred tax assets of $3.9 million and $13.2 million, as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The Company maintained a valuation allowance related to the U.S. deferred tax assets of $82.5 million and $73.1 million, as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. For other jurisdictions there are no temporary differences to consider for the valuation allowance.
As of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the Company maintained a total valuation allowance of $14.3$127.4 million and $17.6$139 million, respectively, which relatesrelating toforeign, federal, and state deferred tax assets asassets. This decrease is partially due to the removal of December 31, 2019 and foreign, federal and
statethe United Kingdom deferred tax assets as December 31, 2018.asset of $8.7 million related to Pipeline UK and the deconsolidation. The valuation allowance is based onamount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be adjusted if estimates of future taxable income in each ofduring the jurisdictions in which we operate and thecarryforward period over which our deferred tax assets will be recoverable. The movementare reduced or increased or if objective negative evidence in the valuation allowanceform of cumulative losses is primarily dueno longer present and additional weight is given to reclassification of balances to assets heldsubjective evidence such as our projections for sale.growth.
The following table provides a summary of the changes in the deferred tax valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, 2021, and 20172020 (in thousands): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Deferred tax valuation allowance at January 1 | $ | 139,005 | | | $ | 138,689 | | | $ | 46,967 | |
| Additions | 10,236 | | | 9,329 | | | 91,866 | |
| Acquired | — | | | — | | | — | |
| Deductions | (21,854) | | | (9,013) | | | (144) | |
| | | | | |
| Deferred tax valuation allowance at December 31 | $ | 127,387 | | | $ | 139,005 | | | $ | 138,689 | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Deferred tax valuation allowance at January 1 | $ | 17,562 |
| | $ | 22,067 |
| | $ | 3,028 |
|
| Additions | — |
| | 10,960 |
| | 712 |
|
| Acquired | 150 |
| | (15,431 | ) | | 18,494 |
|
| Deductions | (2,838 | ) | | (34 | ) | | (167 | ) |
| Reclass to assets available for sale | (571 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Deferred tax valuation allowance at December 31 | $ | 14,303 |
| | $ | 17,562 |
| | $ | 22,067 |
|
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S.US federal, state and local jurisdictions and in foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS"(“IRS”) and state jurisdictions for years prior to 20162019 and is no longer subject to examination by the tax authorities in foreign and state jurisdictions prior to 2006,2007, with the exception of net operating loss carryforwards. The Company is currently under examination for income tax filings in various foreign jurisdictions.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company had foreignU.S. federal net operating losses of $33.2 million, U.S. tax credits of $11.3$21.5 million, foreign net operating losses of $9.4$152.8 million, state net operating losses of $68.8$181.9 million and state tax credits of $2.0$3.6 million. As of December 31, 2018,2021, the Company had foreignU.S. federal net operating losses of $55.6 million, U.S. tax credits of $16.8$21.4 million, foreign net operating losses of $37.3 million, federal net operating losses of $3.0$202.0 million, state net operating losses of $70.0$151.2 million and state tax credits of $2.4$4.0 million. The foreignU.S. tax credits, if not utilized, will expire in 2026.2026 through 2038. A portion of the foreign net operating losses ($4.5 million)$90.3 million expire at various dates through 2026;2037; the remainderremaining $62.5 million have an unlimited carryforward period. The federal net operating losses have an unlimited carryforward period. The state net operating losses and state tax credits, if not utilized, will expire at various dates through 2036.2042.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act includes significant changes to the U.S. corporate income tax system including: a federal corporate rate reduction from 35% to 21%; limitations on the deductibility of interest expense and executive compensation; creation of the base erosion anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”), a new minimum tax; GILTI; and the transition of U.S. international taxation from a worldwide tax system to a modified territorial tax system. The change to a modified territorial tax system resulted in a one-time U.S. tax liability on those earnings which have not previously been repatriated to the U.S. (the “Transition Tax”), with future distributions not subject to U.S. federal income tax when repatriated. A majority of the provisions in the Tax Act were effective January 1, 2018 and have been reflected in our financial statements. With respect to GILTI, the Company has adopted a policy to account for this provision as a period cost.
In response to the Tax Act, the SEC staff issued guidance on accounting for the tax effects of the Tax Act (ASU 2018-05). The guidance provided a one-year measurement period for companies to complete the accounting. The Company has adopted the impact of ASU 2018-05 in our financial statements.
In connection with the impact of the Tax Act, we recorded a $0.5 million net tax benefit for the period ended December 31, 2017. This benefit consists of zero net expense for the Transition Tax liability, and $0.5 million benefit from the remeasurement of our deferred tax assets/liabilities due to the corporate rate reduction. The Company did not owe the one-time Transition Tax liability, based on foreign tax pools that are in excess of U.S. tax rates. The impact of the Tax Act resulted in a valuation allowance on a portion of our U.S. foreign tax credit carryforwards (deferred tax asset), in the amount of $10.9 million expense which was recorded in 2018.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, the liability for uncertain income tax positions was approximately $0.6$2.1 million. Approximately $0.6$1.5 million as of December 31, 20192022 represents the amount that if recognized would affect the Company’s effective income tax rate in future periods. The Company does not expect the unrecognized tax benefits to change over the next 12 months. The table below does not include interest and penalties of $0.0$0.1 million and $0.4$0.2 million as of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, respectively.
The following is a reconciliation of the Company’s liability for uncertain income tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020 (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Balance beginning January 1 | $ | 593 |
| | $ | 3,014 |
| | $ | 3,000 |
|
| Additions/(reductions) for tax positions of prior years | — |
| | (460 | ) | | (7 | ) |
| Additions/(reductions) based on tax positions related to current year | 37 |
| | (340 | ) | | (65 | ) |
| Acquired uncertain tax position balance | — |
| | (512 | ) | | 1,221 |
|
| Settlements | — |
| | (1,103 | ) | | (338 | ) |
| Lapse of statute of limitations | — |
| | (6 | ) | | (978 | ) |
| Currency movement | — |
| | — |
| | 181 |
|
| Balance ending December 31 | $ | 630 |
| | $ | 593 |
| | $ | 3,014 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2020 |
| Balance beginning January 1 | $ | 2,578 | | | $ | 1,078 | | | $ | 630 | |
| Additions/(reductions) for tax positions of prior years | (461) | | | 1,529 | | | 448 | |
| Additions/(reductions) based on tax positions related to current year | 311 | | | 212 | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| Tax Audit Settlement | (269) | | | (200) | | | — | |
| | | | | |
| Currency movement | (44) | | | (41) | | | — | |
| Balance ending December 31 | $ | 2,115 | | | $ | 2,578 | | | $ | 1,078 | |
Undistributed earningsearnings of our foreign subsidiaries amounted to $196.4$87.8 million and $259.9$86.0 million at December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2018,2021, respectively. The undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries (except for one of our China subsidiaries and a $1.5 million dividend that has been approved but not yet distributed from an Indian subsidiary. $0.2 million of withholding tax has been accrued on this dividend) are considered to be indefinitely reinvested unless earnings can be repatriated in a tax efficient manner and accordingly, no provision for U.S. federal and statefor income taxes has been recorded.recorded (except for withholding taxes related to the forementioned China and India subsidiaries). Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability on these undistributed earnings is not practicable because of the complexity of laws and regulations, the varying tax treatment of alternative repatriation scenarios, and the variation due to multiple potential assumptions relating to the timing of any future repatriation.
(12)(11) Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Customer deposits and obligations | $ | 24,006 |
| | $ | 25,251 |
|
| Commissions payable and sales incentive | 2,472 |
| | 3,517 |
|
| Penalty accruals | 1,847 |
| | 1,957 |
|
| Warranty reserve | 1,642 |
| | 2,980 |
|
| Professional fees | 2,318 |
| | 2,775 |
|
| Taxes other than income tax | 3,551 |
| | 2,913 |
|
| Other Contract Liabilities | 9,153 |
| | 14,646 |
|
| Income tax payable | 5,521 |
| | 3,529 |
|
| Other | 43,659 |
| | 34,928 |
|
| Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 94,169 |
| | $ | 92,496 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| 2022 | | | 2021 |
| Contract liabilities | $ | 36,871 | | | | $ | 26,870 | |
| Commissions payable and sales incentive | 2,853 | | | | 3,594 | |
| Warranty reserve | 2,521 | | | | 2,739 | |
| Professional fees | 1,774 | | | | 2,529 | |
| Taxes other than income tax | 3,342 | | | | 3,091 | |
| Income tax payable | 2,051 | | | | 3,075 | |
| Short term pension liability and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) | 4,789 | | | | 4,560 | |
| Operating lease liability | 5,246 | | | | 3,682 | |
| Other | 25,063 | | | | 31,858 | |
| Total accrued expenses and other current liabilities | $ | 84,510 | | | | $ | 81,998 | |
(13)(12) Financing Arrangements
Debt
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2022 | | 2021 |
| Term Loan at interest rates ranging from 5.0%-9.9% in 2022 and 4.3%-5.0% in 2021 | $ | 489,575 | | | $ | 525,000 | |
| Line of Credit at interest rates ranging from 6.8%-11.3% in 2022 and 3.6%-6.8% in 2021 | 27,350 | | | — | |
| Short-Term Borrowings | — | | | 1,311 | |
| Total Principal Debt Outstanding | 516,925 | | | 526,311 | |
| Less: Unamortized Discount and Debt Issuance Costs | 20,391 | | | 13,006 | |
| Less: Short-Term Borrowings and Current Portion of Long-Term Debt | — | | | 1,611 | |
| Total Long-Term Debt, net | $ | 496,534 | | | $ | 511,694 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Term Loan at interest rates ranging from 5.24%-6.0% in 2019 and 4.93%-5.92% in 2018 | $ | 653,850 |
| | $ | 777,150 |
|
| Line of Credit at interest rates ranging from 5.65%-8.00% in 2019 and 4.93%-8.00% in 2018 | — |
| | 29,900 |
|
| Total Principal Debt Outstanding | 653,850 |
| | 807,050 |
|
| Less: Term Loan Debt Issuance Costs | 17,553 |
| | 21,013 |
|
| Less: Current Portion | — |
| | 7,850 |
|
| Total Long-Term Debt, net | $ | 636,297 |
| | $ | 778,187 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| 2023 | | 2024 | | 2025 | | 2026 | | 2027 | | Thereafter |
| Minimum principal payments | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 27,350 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 489,575 | |
As of December 31, 2022, the Company had gross borrowings of $516.9 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement compared to $525.0 million as of December 31, 2021. In addition, the Company had $0.0 million and $1.3 million in other short-term borrowings as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | Thereafter |
| Minimum principal payments | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 653,850 |
| | $ | — |
|
On December 11, 2017, we20, 2021, the Company entered into a secured credit agreement (the "Credit Agreement"" Credit Agreement”), which provides for a $150.0$100.0 million revolving line of credit with a five year maturity and a $785.0$530.0 million term loan with a seven year maturity which was funded in full at closingclosing. As of the FH acquisition.December 31, 2022, we had available capacity to borrow an additional $48.3 million under our revolving credit facility. The Credit Agreement replaced and terminated the Company’s prior credit agreement, dated as of MayDecember 11, 2017 (the "Prior“Prior Credit Agreement"Agreement”). The Prior Credit Agreement, under which we had borrowings of $273.5 million outstanding, was terminated on December 11, 2017 and replaced by the Credit Agreement..
The term loan requires quarterly principal payments of 0.25% of initial aggregate principal amount beginning March 29, 2018 with the balance due atuntil maturity. During 2019, theThe Company paid down its term loan by $123.3 million primarily with divestiture-related proceeds thereby satisfying all future amortizationhas mandatory debt repayment obligations (previously $2.0of $5.3 million per quarter)year until 20242028 under the Credit Agreement. AdditionalHowever, since the Company made a $5.0 million prepayment on its term loan in December 2021, and $35.4 million in prepayments in April and September 2022 from sale-leaseback proceeds, there are no further repayment obligations until the term loan matures in December 2028.
On April 8, 2022, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment makes certain changes to the Credit Agreement, including (i) extending the deadline for the Company to deliver its annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021, (ii) increasing the interest rate margins for (a) the term loan facility to 5.50% with respect to Eurodollar loans, (b) the revolving facility to 4.75% with respect to Eurodollar loans and (c) the swing line facility to 3.75%, (iii) in the event of a step-down in the debt ratings of the facilities, increasing the interest rate margins for the term loan facility by an additional 0.50% during any such step-down period, (iv) decreasing certain debt, lien, investment, restricted payment and affiliate transaction baskets and negative covenant thresholds by 15%, (v) further decreasing or eliminating the use of certain debt, lien, investment and restricted payment baskets during the period until the date on which the Company delivers the annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 (such period, the “Restricted Period”), (vi) eliminating the minimum threshold and reinvestment rights with respect to mandatory prepayments of the term loans with the net cash proceeds of sale-leaseback transactions, subject to certain exceptions, (vii) restricting the Company’s ability to borrow swing loans or revolving loans if the aggregate amount of cash and cash equivalents of the Company and its domestic subsidiaries exceeds $10.0 million and creating a requirement to prepay outstanding swing loans and revolving loans with any such excess, in each case, during the Restricted Period, (viii) resetting the “soft call” prepayment premium for an additional 12 months, and (ix) requiring the Company to hold private-side lender calls twice upon request of the Administrative Agent during the Restricted Period and promptly after the delivery of all quarterly and annual financial statements. In connection with the execution of the First Amendment, the Company paid approximately $12.5 million in customary arranger and lender consent fees, attorney fees, and reasonable and documented expenses of the Administrative Agent.
Per the First Amendment, additional loans may be made available up to $150.0the greater of $85.0 million (plusor 80% of total earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization plus the amount of certain voluntary prepayments)prepayments and plus an unlimited amount subject to compliance with a first lien net leverage ratio of 6.504.5 to 1.00 may be made available under the Credit Agreementor less upon request ofby the Company subject to specified terms and conditions. The Company may repay any borrowings under the Credit Agreement at any time, subject to certain limited and customary restrictions stated in the Credit Agreement;stated; provided, however, that if the Company prepays all or any portion of the term loan in connection with a repricing transaction on or prior to the 6-month12-month anniversary of the origination date,First Amendment, the Company must pay a prepayment premium of 1.0% of the aggregate principal amount of the term loan so prepaid.
On May 27, 2022, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”). The Second Amendment makes certain changes to the Credit Agreement, including, to extend the deadline for the Company to deliver its annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and its quarterly financial statements for the fiscal quarters ended April 3, 2022 and July 3, 2022. In addition, the Company is required to hold private-side lender calls at least once per month upon request, and promptly after the delivery of all quarterly and annual financial statements. In connection with the execution of the Second Amendment, the Company paid approximately $4.2 million in customary arranger and lender consent fees, attorney fees, and reasonable and documented expenses of the Administrative Agent.
Prior to Amendments No.1 and No. 2, the Company had $12.6 million of unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs associated with its term loan and $1.5 million unamortized deferred financing fees associated with its revolver as of April 3, 2022. Per Amendments No. 1 and No. 2, the Company incurred $23.9an additional $15.5 million of debt discount and issuance costs associated with the term loan which have been recorded as a debt discount within long-term debt, and $5.2$1.2 million of fees associated with the revolver which have been recordedrevolver. The Company evaluated the accounting for this transaction under ASC 470 to determine modification versus extinguishment accounting on a creditor-by-creditor basis. During the second quarter 2022, the Company accounted for a combination of old and new debt discount and issuance costs totaling $23.1 million as a modification (recorded as a debt discount and issuance costs on the consolidated balance sheet) and accounted for $5.0 million as a debt extinguishment (included in special charges on the consolidated statements of operations). For the revolving credit facility, $1.2 million was rolled into the existing Credit Agreement (included in other assets.
assets) during the second quarter 2022 based on the borrowing capacity with the underlying banks. As of December 31, 2019, we2022, there was $20.4 million of debt issuance costs recorded as a debt discount and issuance costs on the consolidated balance sheet and $2.3 million recorded in other assets associated with the Company's revolving credit facility.
The Company had borrowings of $653.9$24.4 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement and $34.3$24.7 million in letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreement.Agreement as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively. The Company recorded non-cash interest expense of $3.9$3.6 million, $3.9 million, and $0.8$4.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively, related to the amortization of its deferred financing costs described above.costs. The Credit Agreement revolving line of credit facility matures on December 11, 202220, 2026 whereas the term loan facility matures on December 11, 2024.20, 2028.
The Company's outstanding debt balances are characterized as Level 2 financial instruments. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the estimated fair value of ourits gross term loan debt (before netting debt issuance costs) was $655.8$502.7 million, or $1.9$14.2 million above ourunder its carrying costvalue of $653.9$516.9 million. This compares to an estimated fair value of $524.3 million, or $2.0 million under its carrying value of $526.3 million as of December 31, 2021.
The outstanding principal amounts bear interest at a fluctuating rate (generallyFinancial Instruments
As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the 30 day LIBOR rate) per annum plus an applicable marginCompany had restricted cash balances of 3.50% with respect to LIBOR loans $2.4 million and 2.50% with respect to base rate loans. The Company entered into a hedging agreement to mitigate the inherent rate risk associated with the variable rate debt, which is accounted for as cash flow hedge. Any gain or loss is$1.4 million, respectively. These balances are recorded within accumulatedprepaid expenses and other comprehensive income.current assets on the consolidated balance sheets, and are included within cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows.
Effective April 12, 2018, the Company entered into an interest rate swap pursuant to an International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA")ISDA Master Agreement with Citizens Bank, National Association ("interest rate swap").Association. The four-year interest rate swap has a fixed notional value of $400.0 million with a 1% LIBOR floor and a maturity date of April 12, 2022. The fixed rate of interest paid by the Company is comprised of our current credit spread of 350 basis points plus 2.6475% for a total interest rate of 6.1475%. The ISDA Master Agreement, together with its related schedules, contain customary
representations, warranties and covenants. This hedging agreement was entered into to mitigate the interest rate risk inherent in the Company’s variable rate debt and is not for speculative trading purposes. The Company has designated the interest rate swap aswas a qualifying hedging instrument and is treating itwas accounted for as a cash flow hedge for accounting purposes pursuant to ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging.
Effective July 12, 2019, the Company entered into a cross-currency swap agreement to hedge its net investment in non-U.S. subsidiaries against future volatility in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Euro. The cross-currency swap agreement is pursuant to an ISDA Master Agreement with Deutsche Bank AG. The three-year cross-currency swap has a fixed notional value of $100.0 million at an annualinterest rate of 2.4065% and a maturity date of July 12, 2022. At inception, the cross-currency swap was designated assettled upon its maturity during the second quarter of 2022. As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the interest rate swap had a net investment hedge. The swap was entered into to hedge a portionfair value liability of CIRCOR International Inc.'s net investment in certain of its Euro functional currency-denominated subsidiaries against the variability of exchange rate translation impacts between the US dollar$0.0 million and the Euro. The net investment hedge was deemed effective as of year end.$2.2 million, respectively.
The aggregate net fair value of the interest rate swap and cross currencycross-currency swap as of December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 2021 are summarized in the table below:below (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Significant Other Observable Inputs |
| Level 2 |
| 2022 | | 2021 |
| Derivative asset | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
| Derivative liabilities | $ | — | | | $ | (2,187) | |
|
| | | |
| | Significant Other Observable Inputs |
| | Level 2 |
| Derivative asset | $ | 476 |
|
| Derivative liabilities | $ | (9,168 | ) |
These balances areDerivative liabilities of $(2.2) million were recorded in other long-term liabilities of $(5.1) million, accrued expenses and other current liabilities of $(4.0) million, and other current assets of $0.5 million on ourthe Company's consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021. There were no Derivative assets or liabilities as of December 31, 2019.2022.
The amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive (loss) income ("OCI"(“OCI”) and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ("AOCI"(“AOCI”) to incomeearnings are summarized below:below (in thousands):
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Year Ended |
| | | | | December 31, 2022 | | December 31, 2021 |
| Amount of (loss) recognized in OCI | | | | | $ | (10) | | | $ | (284) | |
| | | | | | | |
| Amount of (loss) reclassified from AOCI to earnings (interest expense, net) | | | | | $ | (1,849) | | | $ | (6,682) | |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Twelve Months Ended |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| | December 31, 2018 |
|
| Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI | $ | (8,580 | ) | | $ | (2,000 | ) |
| | | | |
| Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into income | $ | (1,583 | ) | | $ | (1,600 | ) |
| The realized loss was reclassified from OCI to interest expense as interest expense was accrued on the swap during the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2019, amounts expected to be reclassified from AOCI into interest expense in the next 12 months is a loss of $4.0 million. |
| The Company recorded a long term deferred tax asset of $2.1 million and $0.5 million on our balance sheet as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. |
Interest expense, net (including the effects of the cash flow hedge) related to the portion of the Company's term loan subject to the interest-rate swap agreement was $24.9 $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 and $24.0 million for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2019.2021. The significant decrease in interest expense when compared to 2021 was due to the hedge being in effect for only a partial term in 2022.
(14)(13) Share-Based Compensation
We have threeThe Company has two share-based compensation plans as of December 31, 2019:2022: (1) the 2019 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "2019 Plan"“2019 Plan”), and (2) the 2014 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "2014 Plan"), and (3) the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "1999 Plan"“2014 Plan”). The 2019 Plan was adopted by ourits Board of Directors (subject to shareholder approval) on February 20, 2019 and approved by ourits shareholders at the Company's annual meeting on May 9, 2019. On May 25, 2021 at the Company's annual meeting, the Company's shareholders approved an amendment to the 2019 Plan increasing the number of shares available for issuance from 1,000,000 to 2,000,000 shares (subject to adjustment for stock splits and similar events). As of May 9, 2019, no new awards will be granted under either the 2014 Plan or the 1999 Plan. As a result, any shares subject to outstanding awards under the 2014 Plan and the 1999 Plan that expire, are canceled or otherwise terminate, or are withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations will not be available for award grant purposes under the 2019 Plan. AllBoth plans permit the grant of the following types of awards to ourits officers, other employees and non-employee directors: incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, deferred stock awards, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit ("RSU"(“RSU”) awards, unrestricted stock awards, performance share awards, cash basedcash-based awards, stock appreciation rights ("SARs"(“SARs”) and dividend equivalent rights. The 2019 Plan provides for the issuance of up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock (subject to adjustment for stock splits and
similar events). Under the 2019 Plan, shares issued for all awards count against the aggregate share limit as 1.0 share for every share actually issued. All stock options and RSUs granted under the 19992014 Plan are either 100% vested or have been terminated. RSUs granted under the 2014 Plan and the 2019 Planboth plans generally vest within three years. RSUs will be settled in shares of ourthe Company's common stock. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there were 952,8251,247,421 shares available for grant under the 2019 Plan.
As of December 31, 2019,2022, there were 712,50041,310 stock options (including the CEO stock option award noted below) and 381,561366,321 RSUs outstanding. As of December 31, 2019, there were 11,135 RSUs outstanding that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividend equivalents and are considered participating securities that are included in our computation of basic and fully diluted earnings per share. There is no difference in the earnings per share amounts between the two class method and the treasury stock method, which is why we continue to use the treasury stock method.
The Company measures the cost of all share-based payments, including stock options, at fair value on the grant date and recognizerecognizes this cost in the Consolidated Statementconsolidated statements of Operations,operations, net of actual forfeitures. Compensation expense related to our share-basedits share-based plans for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021, and 20172020 was $5.4$1.9 million, $5.0$5.3 million and $3.8$5.5 million, respectively. ExpensesThe significant decrease in compensation cost in 2022 relates primarily to forfeitures associated with the departure of the Company's former CEO in January 2022 as well as the delay in granting annual equity awards. During 2022, expenses related to non-share basedshare-based compensation are generallywere recorded as follows: $2.5 million as selling, general and administrative expense.expenses and $(0.6) million as special charges due mainly to the Company's former CEO departure. In 2021, expenses related to share-based compensation were recorded entirely in selling, general and administrative expenses. During 2020, $0.2 million of share based compensation expense was classified in discontinued operations related to the sale of the DV business and is not included in the expense of $5.5 million which relates to continuing operations. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there was $8.1$5.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to ourthe Company's outstanding share-based compensation arrangements. ThatThis cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.8 years. This compares to $7.6$7.4 million for 2018,2021 and $6.8$5.4 million for 2017,2020, respectively.
Stock Options
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we granted stock option awards for the purchase of 153,726 shares of our common stock, compared with 127,704 in 2018 and 142,428 in 2017.
On April 9, 2013, we granted a stock option to purchase 200,000 shares of common stock to our President and Chief Executive Officer at an exercise price of $41.17 per share. This award included a service period and a market performance vesting condition. In 2014, certain of these targets were achieved and 150,000 shares vested and remain exercisable. The remaining 50,000 shares were canceled in 2018 due to lack of performance achievement.
On March 5, 2014, we granted a stock option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock to our President and Chief Executive Officer at an exercise price of $70.42 per share. This option award includes a service period and a market performance vesting conditions which were not met and all 100,000 shares were canceled in the year ended December 31, 2018.
The Company uses the Black Scholes pricing model to value the option awards. The average fair value of stock options granted duringDuring the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, December 31, 2021, and 2017December 31, 2020 there were no stock option awards granted for the purchase of $11.84, $14.68, and $19.36, respectively, was estimated usingshares of the following weighted-average assumptions:Company's common stock.
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Risk-free interest rate | 2.6 | % | | 2.5 | % | | 1.7 | % |
| Expected life (years) | 4.3 |
| | 4.3 |
| | 4.4 |
|
| Expected stock volatility | 38.1 | % | | 37.2 | % | | 35.1 | % |
| Expected dividend yield | — | % | | — | % | | 0.2 | % |
Restricted Stock Units
We account
The Company accounts for RSU awards by expensing the weighted average fair value to selling, general and administrative expenses ratably over vesting periods generally ranging up to three years. During the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2022, December 31, 2018, we2021, and December 31, 2020, the Company granted 205,291263,490, 245,345 and 167,480616,612 RSUs, respectively, with approximateweighted average fair values of $$19.1532.92, $40.53, a and $42.87nd $12.88 per RSU award, respectively.
During 20192022, 2021, and 2018,2020, the Company granted performance-based RSUs as part of the overall mix of RSU awards. In 2019,2022 and 2021, these performance-based RSU awards include a market condition based on the Company's total shareholder return relative to a subset of the S&P 600 SmallCap Industrial Companies over a three year performance period. The target payout range is 0% to 200% with a cap not to exceed 600% of the target value on grant date. The 2022 and 2021 performance-based RSUs are valued using a Monte Carlo Simulation model to account for the market condition on grant date. In 2020, these performance-based RSU Awards included metrics for achieving adjusted operating marginAdjusted Operating Margin and adjusted free cash flowAdjusted Measurement Cash Flow with target payouts ofranging from 0% to 200%. In 2018 and prior years, these performance-based RSUs included metrics for achieving return on invested capital and adjusted operating margin with the same target payout ranges. Of the 205,291different performance-based RSU tranches without a market condition, the Company anticipates 0% overall achievement and probability to vest. Of the 263,490 RSUs granted during 2019, 67,3622022, 42,272 are performance-based RSU awards. This compares to 48,08070,933 and 109,278 performance-based RSU awards granted in 2018.2021 and 2020, respectively.
The CIRCOR Management Stock Purchase Plan ("MSPP"(“MSPP”), which is a component of all three of ourthe Company's share-based compensation plans, provides that eligible employees may elect to receive RSUs in lieu of all or a portion of their pre-tax annual incentive bonus and, in some cases, make after-tax contributions in exchange for RSUs (“RSU MSPs”). Each RSU MSP represents a right to receive one share of ourthe Company's common stock after a three-year vesting period. RSU MSPs are granted at a discount of 33% from the fair market value of the shares of common stock on the date of grant. This discount is amortized as compensation expense, to selling, general and administrative expenses, over a four-yearfour-year period. During 2022, RSU MSPs totaling 56,379 and 34,93711,273 were granted with per unit discount amounts representing fair values of $11.10 and $14.06, respectively,$6.51. RSU MSPs totaling 31,248 with per unit discount amounts representing fair values of $13.14 were granted during 2021. There were no RSU MSPs granted under the MSPP during the yearsyear ended December 31, 20192020.
and December 31, 2018, respectively.
A summary of the status of all stock options and RSU awards granted to employees and non-employee directors as of December 31, 20192022 and changes during the year are presented in the table below:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2022 |
| | Stock Options | | RSU Awards | | RSU MSPs |
| | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Exercise Price | | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Price | | Shares | | Weighted
Average
Price |
| Options and awards outstanding at beginning of period | 596,753 | | | $ | 42.58 | | | 445,396 | | | $ | 27.81 | | | 62,251 | | | $ | 24.35 | |
| Granted | — | | | $ | — | | | 263,490 | | | $ | 19.15 | | | 11,273 | | | $ | 13.23 | |
| Exercised/Settled | — | | | $ | — | | | (129,077) | | | $ | 27.83 | | | (28,170) | | | $ | 20.98 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Forfeited | (188,711) | | | $ | 39.62 | | | (233,770) | | | $ | 26.23 | | | (25,072) | | | $ | 25.27 | |
| Expired | (366,732) | | | $ | 43.88 | | | — | | | $ | — | | | — | | | $ | — | |
| Options and awards outstanding at end of period | 41,310 | | | $ | 44.62 | | | 346,039 | | | $ | 22.29 | | | 20,282 | | | $ | 19.55 | |
| Options and awards exercisable at end of period | 41 | | | $ | 44.62 | | | 2,092 | | | $ | 35.30 | | | — | | | $ | — | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2019 |
| | Stock Options | | RSU Awards | | RSU MSPs |
| | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Shares | | Weighted Average Exercise Price |
| Options and awards outstanding at beginning of period | 742,658 |
| | $ | 50.26 |
| | 226,683 |
| | $ | 45.66 |
| | 72,113 |
| | $ | 32.25 |
|
| Granted | 153,726 |
| | $ | 33.63 |
| | 205,291 |
| | $ | 32.92 |
| | 56,379 |
| | $ | 22.53 |
|
| Exercised | (6,516 | ) | | $ | 38.89 |
| | (59,450 | ) | | $ | 44.06 |
| | (16,866 | ) | | $ | 28.81 |
|
| Forfeited | (108,013 | ) | | $ | 68.79 |
| | (97,565 | ) | | $ | 39.99 |
| | (5,024 | ) | | $ | 26.34 |
|
| Expired | (69,355 | ) | | $ | 52.35 |
| | — |
| | | | — |
| | — |
|
| Options and awards outstanding at end of period | 712,500 |
| | $ | 43.76 |
| | 274,959 |
| | $ | 38.51 |
| | 106,602 |
| | $ | 28.06 |
|
| Options and awards exercisable at end of period | 457,778 |
| | $ | 46.12 |
| | 5,689 |
| | $ | 51.71 |
| | 5,446 |
| | $ | 31.90 |
|
U.S. Contribution Plan
The Company also sponsors various defined benefit plans, and other post-retirement benefits plans, including health and life insurance, for former employees of an acquired business. These plans include significant benefit obligations which are calculated based on actuarial valuations. Key assumptions are made in determining these obligations and related net periodic benefit costs, including discount rates, mortality, and expected long-term return on plan assets.
Outside of the U.S., the Company sponsors various funded and unfunded defined benefit plans. The obligations are primarily attributed to a partially funded plansplan in Germany and a fully funded plan in the U.K.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the postretirement plans were as follows (in thousands):
The weighted average assumptions used in determining the net periodic benefit cost and benefit obligations for the post-retirement plans are shown below:
The amounts reported for net periodic benefit cost and the respective benefit obligation amounts are dependent upon the actuarial assumptions used. The Company reviews historical trends, future expectations, current market conditions, and external data to determine the assumptions. The actuarial assumptions used to determine the net periodic pension cost are based upon the prior year’s assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation.
In selecting the expected long-term return on assets for the qualified and foreign plans, wethe Company considered the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits of these plans. We,It, with input from the plans’ professional investment managers and actuaries, also considered the average rate of earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide plan benefits. This process included determining expected returns for the various asset
classes that comprise the plans’ target asset allocation. This basis for selecting the long-term return on assets is consistent with the prior year. Using generally accepted diversification techniques, the plans’ assets, in aggregate and at the individual portfolio level, are invested so that the total portfolio risk exposure and risk-adjusted returns best meet the plans’ long-term benefit obligations to employees. Plan asset allocations are reviewed periodically and rebalanced to achieve target allocation among the asset categories when necessary. This included considering the pension asset allocation and the expected returns likely to be earned over the life of the plans.
Each reporting segment is individually managed, as each requires different technology and marketing strategies, and has separate financial results that are reviewed by ourthe Company's CODM. OurThe CODM evaluates segment performance and determines how to allocate resources utilizing, among other data, segment operating income. Segment operating income excludes special and restructuring charges, net. In addition, certain administrative expenses incurred at the corporate level for the benefit of the reporting segments are allocated to the segments based upon specific identification of costs, employment related information or net revenues. Each segment contains related products and services particular to that segment.
Corporate is reported on a net “after allocations” basis. Inter-segment intercompany transactions affecting net operating profit have been eliminated within the respective reportable segments.
The amounts reported in the Corporate expenses line item in the following table consists primarily of the following: compensation and fringe benefit costs for executive management and other corporate staff; Board of Director compensation; corporate development costs (relating to mergers and acquisitions); human resource development and benefit plan administration expenses; legal, accounting and other professional and consulting costs; facilities, equipment and maintenance costs; and travel and various other administrative costs related to ourthe corporate office and respective functions. The above costs are incurred in the course of furthering the business prospects of the Company and relate to activities such as: implementing strategic business growth opportunities; corporate governance; risk management; tax; treasury; investor relations and shareholder services; regulatory compliance; strategic tax planning; and stock transfer agent costs.
