SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORMForm 10-K


(Mark One)

(Mark One)
 
þANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000

OR

 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001
or
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from           to

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period fromto .

Commission File Number: 0-20981

DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATIONDocument Sciences Corporation

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware 33-0485994
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 
6339 Paseo del Lago, Carlsbad, California 92009
(Address of principal executive offices) (zipZip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (760) 602-1400


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common Stock, $.001 par value per share
(Title of Class)

    Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes þ         No o

    Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.    o

    As of March 30, 2001,February 28, 2002, there were 10,858,3843,869,364 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding and the aggregate market value of such shares held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (based upon the closing sale price of such shares on The Nasdaq National Market on March 30, 2001)February 28, 2002) was approximately $5,689,717.$7,375,355. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each entity that owns 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

    Part III incorporates certain information by reference from Registrant’s definitive proxy statement pursuant to Schedule 14A for its 2001 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 30, 2001,April 23, 2002, which proxy statement will be filed no later than 120 days after the close of Registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.

2001.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A Warning About Forward-Looking StatementsWARNING ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I
Item 1.Business1. Business
Item 2.Properties2. Properties
Item 3.Legal3. Legal Proceedings
Item 4.Submission4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5.Market5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Item 6.Selected6. Selected Financial Data
Item 7.Management’s7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.Quantitative7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.Financial8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.Changes9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosure.
PART III
Item 10.Directors10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
Item 11.Executive11. Executive Compensation
Item 12.Security12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Item 13.Certain13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
PART IV
Item 14.Exhibits,14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K
Signatures
Financial StatementsSIGNATURES
EXHIBIT 10.314.2
EXHIBIT 10.14
EXHIBIT 10.15
EXHIBIT 10.16
EXHIBIT 10.17
EXHIBIT 23.1


TABLE OF CONTENTS

       
Page

A Warning About Forward-Looking Statements  1 
PART I
Item 1 Business  1 
Item 2 Properties  1312 
Item 3 Legal Proceedings  1312 
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders  1312 
PART II
Item 5 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters  1413 
Item 6 Selected Financial Data  1413 
Item 7 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations
  1514 
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  1918 
Item 8 Financial Statements and Supplementary Data  1918 
Item 9 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures  19 
PART III
Item 10 Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant  2019 
Item 11 Executive Compensation  20 
Item 12 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management  20 
Item 13 Certain Relationships and Related Transactions  2120 
PART IV
Item 14 Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K  2120 
Signatures  2221 
Financial Statements  F-1 

i


A WARNING ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

     We make forward-looking statements in this Annual Report that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include information about possible or assumed future results of our financial condition, operations, plans, objectives and performance. Additionally, when we use the words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate” or similar expressions, we are making forward-looking statements. Many possible events or factors could affect our future financial results and performance. This could cause our results or performance to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. You should consider these risks when you review this document, along with the following possible events or factors:

 • national, international, regional and local economic, competitive and regulatory conditions and developments;
 
 • the market for document automation software;
 
 • market acceptance of enhancements to our existing products and introduction of new products and enhancements to existing products;
 
 • continued expansion of our professional services;
 
 • maintaining our relationships with Xerox;
• possible transfer of our listing of our shares to the NASDAQ SmallCap Market;Xerox Corporation; and
 
 • other uncertainties, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control.

     Foreseeable risks and uncertainties are described elsewhere in this report and in detail under “Item 1. Business — Risk Factors.” You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which reflect management’s analysis only as of the date of this Annual Report. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revision of the forward-looking statements.

PART I

Item 1.     Business

     Document Sciences Corporation develops, markets and supports a family of document automation software used in high volume print and transactional electronic publishing applications. Document automation has become increasingly important as more companies realize the benefits of producing individually customizedpersonalized documents that requireinclude the precise layout of regulated content, personal financial data and in-context, one-to-one marketing information. Our document automation software the(ourDocument Sciences Autographfamily of products,products) enables personalized publishing solutions for many industries including insurance, managed healthcare, financial services, commercial print services, government, telecommunications and manufacturing. Our products facilitate an important form of communication between organizations and their customers by employing enterprise database assets to produce high-quality, personalizedhighly-personalized documents that are ready to print on demand, to email or to distribute over the web using HTML or Adobe Systems’ (Adobe) PDF® technology. OurDocument Sciences Autographisproducts are licensed to approximately 600 customers worldwide who collectively produce over one billion customized pages per month. Our highly portableDocument Sciences Autographsoftware platform enables cost-effective, just-in-time, on demand, high volume or transactional publishing that is high quality and fully automated. Our software products are used across a wide array of computing environments from client/server PC and Unix configurations to large mainframe computer systems.

Company Formation

     We were incorporated in Delaware in October 1991 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Xerox Corporation.Corporation (Xerox). Following our initial public offering of stock in September 1996, Xerox ownership was reduced to approximately 62%. After the completionAs a result of our tender offer to purchase 6,000,000 shares ofand our outstanding stock, which expired on March 23, 2001, and the likely exercise of ouran option to purchase additional shares

1


from Xerox itsin April 2001, Xerox’s ownership interest will likely behas been reduced to approximately 19.9%.See“Management’s “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — OverviewLiquidity and Recent Developments.”
Capital Resources”.

1


Products

     TheOurDocument Sciences Autographfamily of products currently addresses threetwo major functional areas within the enterprise content and document automation arena: Document Composition and Assembly Variableand Regulated Content Management and Electronic Document Viewing, as described below.Management. All of our software products can be complemented by our professional services organization.

     Historically, we have licensedWe generally license our products for one year, for an initial license fee, after which an annual renewal license and support fee, usually 15% of the initial license fee, is required for continued use. We have augmented this approach with newtwo additional licensing models whereby we offer perpetual licenses for our products, as well as three-year term licenses, after which the license may be renewed for additional three-year terms, or converted for perpetual use. We also provide three-year maintenance agreements that are usually in an amount equal to 15%, per year of the initial license fee. The list price for a three-year license fee for CompuSet, our core product, is currently $80,000$90,000 for a mainframe installation and ranges down to $40,000$45,000 for a PC NT server installation. Options currently range from $2,000 to $50,000. A typical new account sale through our direct channel is currently aboutapproximately $100,000 for software licenses and approximately $75,000 for professional services.

Document Composition and Assembly

     Composition and Assembly.CompuSet software automates document assemblycomposition and compositionassembly using corporate data and variable content. CompuSet consists of a rule-based language and a robust composition engine that provides high-speed content assemblycomposition and compositionassembly of complex personalized documents at a high level of quality. The corporateCorporate data and variable content are marked with CompuSet tags which, in turn, are defined in logically separate CompuSet style specifications. The CompuSet tags are conceptually and syntactically similar to HTML or XML tags, the current web standards for content tagging, and the CompuSet style specification isspecifications are conceptually similar to CSS and XSL, the current web standards for style definition. Without requiring any real-time user interaction, CompuSet transforms the tagged data, the style specifications and the variable content into high-quality electronic documents that can beare assembled and composed and assembled at rates in excess of 50 pages per second, depending on the computing platform configuration and the complexity of the document. DocumentThe document composition features are rich and extensive, including the automatic generation of multi-dimensional dynamic data driven graphics and the support of full color text and images. The assemblycomposition and compositionassembly process can be optimized for print, email and/or web presentation media.media for multi-channel distribution.

     Data and Variable Content Capture.Corporate data and variable content capture products include the Data Preparation Tool, or DPT, as well as a number of variable content Importers. These tools map corporate data and prepare variable content for subsequent assembly and composition. DPT is an optional product that enables users to capture and tag corporate data and variable content from a wide variety of sources, including flat files and relational databases, for subsequent CompuSet processing. It provides an easy-to-use Graphical User Interface, or GUI, that describes the data environment and the related data processing and tagging instructions for CompuSet. It then automatically generates a data-tagging program in COBOL that is compatible with mainframe COBOL compilers and Acucorp’s AcuCobol® runtime products. The content Importers accept externally generated document objects, including text, static graphics and scanned images, and converts them into CompuSet compatible formats. The content Importers currently support merge objects in Xerox Corporation’s (Xerox) Metacode®, Adobe’s PostScript® and EPS®, and in the TIFF and JPEG standards for scanned images. This part of theAutographarchitecture is extensible and new content Importers can be developed for supplemental print, email and web media, as required.

Document Output and Merge.The CompuSet Emitters transform CompuSet generated output into a number of popular Page Description Languages or PDLs,(PDLs) for subsequent printing, electronic distribution and/or archive storage for future retrieval and viewing. TheThese PDLs provide device-specific instructions for rendering text, forms, images and graphics into finished documents. The Emitters also condition the PDLs for transport over a variety of high-speed printing interfaces and for support of various

2


finishing devices. The PDL formats currently supported are Xerox Metacode,Xerox’ Metacode®, International Business Machines Corporation’s (IBM) AFPDS®, Hewlett-Packard Company’s PCL® and Adobe’s PostScript®. and PDF. This part of theAutographarchitecture is extensible and new Emitters can be developed as required. Additionalnecessary. In 2001, we significantly extended our architecture with the release of Output Processing. Output Processing enables inline output stream manipulation including stream splitting, merging, resequencing, sorting, bundling and barcoding. These features are necessary for postal optimization, for the support of finishing equipment without further post-processing and for multi-channel applications that require both print and electronic (email) distribution. In addition, several additional Emitter features and enhancements,extensions were released, including support for inline Output Processing functionality, are plannedCreo’s Variable Print Specification® (VPS), enabling high-volume full-color production on Xerox DocuColor products, as well as additional extensions for introduction during 2001.
IBM’s AFPDS® and Adobe’s PDF®.

     Rapid Application Development Tools.The Visual CompuSet application development tools run on Microsoft Corporation’s (Microsoft) Windows® and simplify variable document application design and prototyping. Visual CompuSet incorporates support for the optional DPT product, for a variety of Importer, Merge, Font and Emitter tools, as well as for the CompuSeries II design environment and JetForm Corporation’s JetForm Design Tool®. Visual CompuSet uses a WindowsWindows® version of CompuSet andthat supports all of the dynamic functions andcomposition features of the NT, Unix and mainframe CompuSet production engines.engines to ensure exact design for all supported production platforms. Visual CompuSet includes a variety of content Importer, Merge, Font and Emitter tools necessary for basic application development. The content Importers accept externally generated

2


document content, including text and forms, static graphics and scanned images, and converts them into CompuSet compatible formats. The content Importers currently support merge content in Xerox Metacode®, Adobe PostScript® and EPS® and in the TIFF and JPEG standards for scanned images. This part of theAutographarchitecture is extensible and new content Importers can be developed as necessary. Visual CompuSet also provides an extensible and easy-to-use Graphical User Interface (GUI) platform for our optional Data Preparation Tool and Professional Edition product options as described below.

     Data Preparation Tool.The Data Preparation Tool (DPT) is a Visual CompuSet product extension that enables users to map, capture, edit and tag corporate data and variable content from a wide variety of sources, including flat files and popular relational databases. It provides an easy-to-use GUI that enables the description of a complex variable data environment including any related data processing and tagging instructions. Using a data description, it automatically generates a COBOL data-tagging program that is compatible with mainframe COBOL compilers and with Acucorp’s AcuCobol® runtime products on Unix and NT platforms. DPT eliminates the need to manually develop and maintain custom programs for capturing, processing and tagging corporate data used to drive personalized document assembly and composition. DPT is the production engine for applications that are developed using our fully integrated design tool, Visual CompuSet Professional Edition.

Visual CompuSet Professional Edition. Visual CompuSet Professional Edition or VCPro,(VCPro) significantly augments the capabilities of the basic Visual CompuSet product. Anand DPT products through the addition of an interactive Document Designer component that is tightly integrated with the graphical DPT user interface. UsersGUI. VCPro users can define their existing data environment with DPT and can directly associate their data and variable content elements with CompuSet style objectsspecifications such as sections, paragraphs, tabular elements, images, photographs and 2 and 3-D data-driven graphics. The DPT andVCPro Document Designer GUI interactions featurefeatures WYSIWYG interaction and Drag-and-Dropdrag-and-drop operability. The feature set is rich and general-purpose and the design centerline isoptimized for the generation of complex high-value investment and other financial statements. Existing Visual CompuSetIn 2001, we released VCPro Web Designer, a new product option that enables the parallel development of HTML portal applications using the same DPT data environment as a related print application. In a single GUI, users are able to design an application for both print and real-time web distribution. For example, an investment statement designed for traditional print distribution can upgradebe easily web-enabled for on-demand interactive web access. The web-enabled application can be integrated into a corporate web portal that provides personalized customer access to individual account information. VCPro Web Designer eliminates the new Professional Edition product, released November 2000. Additional VCPro enhancements, including integratedneed to develop and maintain duplicate application development environments for both web application support, are planned for introduction during 2001.and print.

  VariableRegulated Content Management

     Variable Content ManagementOurAutographregulated content management products provide client/server solutions for the creation, revision and management of document componentscontent used in several types of regulated document automation solutions.applications. They consist of the Document Library Service or DLS,(DLS) Server and Client products, DLS Web Express, DLS eCor and DLSCOM. Unlike other general-purpose content management products, ourAutographDLS products are tailored for regulated document applications.

     DLS Server and Clients.Client.The DLS Server manages the document componentcontent creation process required byin complex, variable andregulated text-intensive documents, such as proposals, contracts, policies and customer correspondence. In addition to component creation,Our DLS also supports the definition of complex assembly rules required for interactive or fully automated document composition and assembly using Microsoft Word and/or CompuSet. DLS usesproducts use a client server architecture for accessing data and files stored on a mainframemainframes or NT network server. Theservers. DLS Client product manages the text objectscontent created with Microsoft Word,Word® and stored in HTML. The DLS text objects arecontent is tracked and managed in a multi-authoring environment that supports access security, content searching, revision control and approval workflow. In addition to content creation and management, DLS also providesClient enables the definition of complex assembly and business rules required for interactive or automated document assembly and composition using Microsoft Word® and/or CompuSet. DLS supports a criteria-based document text objectcontent selection capabilitymechanism for customized or personalized documents. These criteria are then used by DLS to select the text objects and generategenerating a Microsoft WordWord® document or a CompuSet-readyCompuSet tagged file, based on application volume requirements. The customized or personalized document assembly can be directed to occur in a high volume fashion on thea server or in a just-in-time,just in time, on-demand fashion on thea local DLS Client PC.computer.

3


     DLS Web Express.DLS Web Express augments the flexibility of our DLS product line by incorporating Internetweb support. DLS Web Express enables the dynamic creation and fulfillment of web-ready documents using HTML and/or Adobe’s PDF.PDF®. These web documents can be created on-demand through a variety of web server applications including Advanced Server PagePages (ASP), or other web server applications.. Dynamic web browser form input iscan be routed to the DLS Web Express Serverserver to automatically assemble and generate a customized web-ready document for local browser viewing or for local printing. Target web fulfillment applications for DLS Express include insurance agent and sales proposal automation. Existing DLS users can upgrade to the new DLS Web Express product. Additional features and enhancements to DLS Web Express are plannedcontract automation for 2001.insurance and other financial agents.

     DLS eCor and DLSCOM. The recent introduction of DLS eCor and DLSCOM in December 2000 further augments theaugment our DLS technology capabilities by providing a rich feature-set that is targeted at enterprise-

3


wideenterprise-wide correspondence applications. DLS eCor enables the on-demand generation of customer correspondence by customer support personnel in a network or Intranet environment.through corporate call centers. DLS eCor alsois web-based and features aan integrated Java editor that can be used to make additional manual or exception changes to pre-assembled customer correspondence. DLS eCor supports an email-based change tracking, approval and workflow process to ensure document integrity and compliance. DLSCOM is a component product version that enables the deployment of our DLS technology in a Microsoft COMCOM/ DCOM environment. With DLSCOM and DLS eCor and/or DLSCOM, customers can tightly integrate theour DLS products into a CRMCustomer Relationship Management (CRM) system or eCRMelectronic CRM system of their choice.

Electronic Document ViewingAutograph for the Enterprise

     Electronic Document Viewing enables on-line viewing and archiving of electronic documents produced by Autograph applications. It consists of a proprietary viewing architecture using the CCF Emitter and CompuView, as well as an open viewing architecture using the PDF Emitter for supporting Adobe’s popular Portable Document Format. The CCF Emitter is availableOur products generally are licensed initially for a varietysingle document automation application. Regulated content applications such as policies and contracts are typically implemented using our DLS products whereas statement applications are typically implemented using our VCPro products. In each case, document production is driven through our CompuSet products. A growing number of mainframe, Unix, and PC NT servers. The electronic document filescustomers are generated in the Composite Container Format, or CCF, which is optimizedlicensing our entireAutographproduct suite for fast, memory-efficient viewing, transport and storage of variable document streams, and these can be searched and viewed using CompuView. CCF files consist of three major components: an internal rendition of the pages for WYSIWYG viewing, various indices for locating documents and reusable document elements. The view of the document is virtually identical to the printed document. CCF files can be distributed, archived or printed through document distribution and archiving systems offered by third party software developers that integrate CCF and CompuView. The PDF Emitter can also be used to support archiving and viewing using third party archiving products. Lastly, indexed support of IBM’s AFPDS document format is provided for compatibility with IBM’s On-Demand offering.use across multiple applications throughout their enterprise.

      We are developing a variety of Internet extensions, as well as considering additional possible future extensions, some of which are not currently under active development. We believe that our core technology can be extended to the Internet and we are continuing our development activities in this area, although there can be no assurance that such development activities will result in commercially successful products. See “Business — Research and Development.”

Professional Services

     In addition to our software products, we provide a comprehensive suite of professional services that can assist customers in the implementation of mission-critical document automation applications. ProfessionalOur professional services include on-site software installation, consulting services, customer training programs and telephone support programs and consulting services.support. Our consulting services are currently focusedfocus on assisting in the sale of high margin initial software licenses by providing project management, requirements analysis, application design and application development services. In addition to consulting services, we provide introductory and advanced-level education classes in CompuSet, Visual CompuSet, DPT, VCPro and DLS at our headquarters in San Diego, our offices in Milwaukee and Washington DC and at customer sites. We believe that the use of our professional services enablesenable customers to deployuse our document automation products more rapidly and effectively. TheOur professional services and support organizations employed a staff of 4241 as of December 31, 2000.2001.

Sales and Marketing

     Our sales and marketing organization targets vertical industry markets that require document automation and high volume, high quality document customization.personalization. We currently license our products using a combination of direct sales and alternative channels. In the United States, we market our products primarily through a direct sales force that manages our existing base of corporate accounts, as well as targets new accounts in select market segments. Our sales account executives are grouped into industry focused teams and are provided with pre-sales technical support bythrough qualified solution analysts. Account executives and solution analysts are located throughout the United States to provide optimal coverage. Outside of the United States, we distribute our software products through value added resellers or VARs,(VARs) such as Xerox Canada, Ltd. in Canada, Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. in Australia and Xerox do Brazil, Ltd. in Brazil. Our subsidiary, Document Sciences Europe, markets our products in Europe, Africa and the Middle East by providing VAR channel

4


management and support and by defining European market and product requirements. Our European VARs are principally Xerox Europe affiliates who re-market our products. Our revenues from export transactions with Xerox affiliates were $4.1 million, $4.6 million, and $4.7 million and $3.7 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. TheOur sales and marketing organization employed a staff of 4136 as of December 31, 2000.
2001.

4


     We intend to increase both our product offerings and markets through joint marketing, sales and distribution and development relationships with other major companies. Current relationships include formal and informal marketing and sales alliances with IBM, Xerox, American Management Systems, Inc., Siebel Systems, and Edgewater Technology, Inc., Sybase, Inc. and Cardiff Software. These relationships provide qualified sales leads for our products and extend our sales coverage and networking capabilities. In addition, we also support partner relationships with complimentary technology companies such as Siebel Systems, Inc., Sybase, Inc. and Oracle Corporation. We participate in joint marketing events with our key partners whenever appropriate and feasible. Furthermore, we actively market our products and solutions at major trade shows, through focused regional seminars and through a variety of web marketing mechanisms, including webinars.

Research and Development

     We are continuing to enhance our World Wide Webweb functionality across all of our major product offerings. We engage customers in a formal requirements analysis that is based on the Quality Function Deployment (QFD) process. The QFD process which is a formal procedure for interviewing customers, identifying their needs and prioritizing specific product features. As a result, we have identified a number of customer requirements for the production of regulated, electronic documents offor the future. Our major productdevelopment initiatives in 20012002 address several of thethese key requirements brought to our attention through theour QFD process.

     In general, our product development strategy is based on delivering document automation solutions for specific types of documents in one or more vertical markets or industries. A cross-functional team that includes a representative from each discipline in the company is responsible for delivering each focused offering. We use a documented business planning and product delivery process to guide our product development and delivery activities. We also employ iterative and rapid prototyping development methodologies.

     Our newrecent product offerings continue to build on our existingDocument Sciences Autographfamily of products. These establishedwell-established products are maintained by teams that respond to customer requests for defect corrections and feature enhancements. By building on our existing products, we maximize our reuse of existing software and expertise and we enable our customers to purchase these new offerings as upgrades.upgrades to their existing product configurations.

     NewFuture new product offerings are increasingly being delivereddeveloped as components that adhere to open standards for large-scale systems integration. Furthermore, new products are increasinglythese product offerings will be supporting open tagged data and content standards such as HTML and XML. By developing withproducts using open standards, we can expand the delivery of our products through large systems integrators.integrators and other channels.

     We can make no assurance that we will be successful in developing, introducing and marketing future new products on a timely and cost-effective basis, if at all, or that such future new products will achieve market acceptance.See— Risk Factors — Our growth depends on market acceptance of enhancements to our existing products and our introduction of new products and enhancements to existing products.”

     We expect to continue to enhanceenhancing our existing products and to develop future new products, particularly as they relate to electronic documentmulti-channel content automation applications. Our research and development expenditures have grown substantially since our inception. Such expenditures, not including amounts capitalized, were $4.3$5.3 million, $4.7$5.3 million and $4.2$5.9 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. Our development organization employed a staff of 4640 as of December 31, 2000. We also utilize outside consulting and development firms and employ independent contractors as needed to supplement our permanent development staff.

Competition

     The market for document automation products is intensely competitive, subject to rapid change and significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. Our software products are targeted atWe target document intensive organizations that require the ability to produce large quantities of customized and personalized documents in paper or electronic form. We face direct and indirect competition from a broad range of competitors who offer a variety of products and solutions to our current and potential customers. Our principal competition currently comes from systems developed in-house by the internal MIS departments of large

5


organizations where there is a reluctance to commit the time and effort necessary to convert their existing document automation processes to our document automation software. We also face

5


competition from DocuCorpDocucorp International, Inc., in the insurance industry, MetaventeMetavante in banking and financial services, Group 1 Software, Inc. in commercial direct mailing and marketing, as well as severalnumerous other smaller competitors. Several of our competitors have longer operating histories, significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources, greater name recognition and a larger installed base of customers than we do.established customers. We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting our market include product performance and functionality, ease of use, scalability, operating across multiple computer and operating system platforms, product and company reputation, client service and support and price.

     It is also possible that we will face competition from new competitors. These include large independent software companies offering personal computer-based application software solutions, such as Microsoft and Adobe, and from large corporations providing database and content management software solutions, such as Oracle Corporation. In addition, Xerox or IBM, either directly or through affiliated entities, could become a large competitor.competitors. Moreover, as the market for document automation software develops, a number of these or other companies with significantly greater resources than we do could attempt to enter or increase their presence in the document automation market by either acquiring or forming strategic alliances with our competitors or by increasing their focus on the industry. In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to address the needs of our current and prospective customers. It is possible that new competitors or alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly acquire significant market share. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Patents and Proprietary Rights

     Our success is dependent, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely primarily on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. We seek to protect our software, documentation and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws, whichlaws. However, these afford only limited protection. We presently have no patents or patent applications pending. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary.See“— Risk “Risk Factors — Our growth is dependent upon successfully protecting our proprietary rights.”

     In addition, we also rely on certain software that we license from third parties, including software that is integrated with internally developed software and used in our products to perform key functions. There can be no assurances that such firms will remain in business, that they will continue to support their products or that their products will otherwise continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. The loss or inability to maintain any of these software licenses could result in delays or reductions in product shipments until equivalent software can be developed, identified, licensed and integrated, which would adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Customers

     We derived 23%19% of our revenues through Xerox and its affiliates in 2000.2001. As a result, discontinuation of agreements and other business transactions that may adversely impact our relationship with Xerox could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Employees

     As of December 31, 2000,2001, we had 148130 employees including 4241 in professional services, 4136 in sales and marketing, 4640 in research and development and 1913 in finance and administration. None of our employees are represented by a labor union.unions. We have experienced no work stoppages and believe our relationship with our employees is good. Competition for qualified personnel in the industry in which we compete is intense. We

6


believe that our future success will depend in part on our continued ability to attract, hire and retain qualified personnel.

6


Financial Information about Segments and Geographic Areas

     The information regarding revenues and operating profit by reportable segments and revenues from unaffiliated customers by geographic region is set forth at the end of the Annual Report under the heading “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements — 3. Segment Information,” and is incorporated herein by reference.

Risk FactorsRISK FACTORS

     The following is a discussion of certain factors which currently impact or may impact our business, operating results and/or financial condition. Anyone making an investment decision with respect to our common stock or other securities is cautioned to carefully consider these factors. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, future operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In such case, the trading price of our common stock could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Our quarterly results fluctuate significantly and we may not be able to grow our business.

     Our total revenues and operating results can vary, sometimes substantially, from quarter to quarter, and we expect them to vary significantly in the future. Our revenues and operating results are difficult to forecast;forecast, and our future results will depend upon many factors, including the following:

 • the demand for our products;
 
 • the level of product and price competition we face;
 
 • the length of our sales cycle;
 
 • the size and timing of individual license transactions;
 
 • the delay or deferral of customer implementations;
 
 • the budget cycles of our customers;
 
 • our success in expanding our direct sales force or indirect distribution channels;
 
 • the timing of our new product introductions and enhancements, as well as those of our competitors;
 
 • our mix of products and services;
 
 • our level of international sales;
 
 • the activities of and acquisitions by our competitors;
 
 • our timing of new hires;
 
 • changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
 
 • our ability to develop and market new products and to control costs; and
 
 • general domestic and international economic conditions.

     Our initial license fee revenue mainly depends on when orders are received and shipped. However, because of our sales model, our customers’ implementation schedule and the complexity of the implementation process, revenue from some software shipments may not be recognized in the same quarter as when a shipment occurs. Our operating expenses are primarily based on anticipated revenue levels. Since a high percentage of those expenses are relatively fixed, a delay in the recognition of revenue from license transactions could cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter and we may sustain losses as a result. If such expenses precede increased revenues, our operating results would be materially adversely affected.

7


     As a result of these factors, results from operations for any quarter are subject to significant variation, and we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and you

7


should not relybe relied upon them as an indication of our future performance. Furthermore, our operating results in some future quarter may fall below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. If this occurs, the price of our common stock would likely be materially adversely affected.

We are substantially controlled by Xerox.

      Xerox owns approximately 62% of the outstanding shares of our common stock. Consequently, Xerox controls Document Sciences, is able to elect our entire board of directors and could have significant input into our operations. In addition, Xerox is able to determine the outcome of all corporate actions requiring stockholder approval, including potential mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and sales of all or substantially all of our assets. Xerox’s voting power could delay or prevent a change in control of Document Sciences and may prevent or discourage tender offers for our common stock at a premium price by another person or entity. Xerox affiliates currently hold one of the five seats on our board of directors.

      As discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Overview and Recent Developments,” our tender offer for up to 6,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock expired on March 23, 2001. The offer was oversubscribed. Xerox tendered all of its shares of Document Sciences in that offer, but will be subject to proration. Xerox also gave us an option to purchase up to 2,000,000 additional shares of our common stock that it owns at the tender offer price under the condition that they would hold at least 19.9% of our common stock outstanding after the exercise of the option. After the conclusion of the tender offer and our likely exercise of the option, we expect Xerox to own approximately 19.9% of our common stock outstanding.

We currently derive a significant portion of our revenues through Xerox.

     We currently have a variety of contractual and informal relationships with Xerox and its affiliates, of Xerox, including a cooperative marketing agreement, a transfer and license agreement and various distribution agreements. We rely on these relationships and agreements for a significant portion of our total revenues.

• In 2000, In 2001, revenues derived from relationships with Xerox and affiliates of Xerox accounted for approximately $5.2 million, representing 23% of our total revenues;
• In 1999, revenues derived from relationships with Xerox and affiliates of Xerox accounted for approximately $5.2 million, representing 21% of our total revenues; and
• In 1998, revenues derived from relationships with Xerox and affiliates of Xerox accounted for approximately $5.4 million, representing 27% of our total revenues.

      Included above were commissions that we received from sales of Xerox printers under our strategic marketing alliance with Xerox. These commissions were:

• 2000: $0;
• 1999: $287,000; and
• 1998: $344,000.

      These commissions have little or no associated costsaccounted for approximately $5.2 million, $5.2 million and have contributed a substantial portion$4.1 million in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively, representing 21%, 23% and 19% of our income from operations for certain prior operating periods. This commission arrangement was terminated as of September 30, 1999.total revenues, respectively.

     Furthermore, there can be no assurance that existing and potential customers will continue to do business with us because of these relationships or our historical ties with Xerox and its affiliates. Although we intend to continue our existing business relationships with Xerox, our strategy is to lessen our dependence on Xerox. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so and, because of our current level of dependence on Xerox, there can be no assurance that our move to become more independent will not adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition. Our failure to maintain these

8


relationships, particularly with Xerox and its affiliates, or to establish new relationships in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

     Xerox has strategic alliances and other business relationships with other companies who supply software and services used in high volume electronic publishing applications and who now or in the future may be our competitors. There can be no assurance that Xerox or one of its affiliated companies will not engage in business that directly competes with us. In addition, Xerox has ongoing internal development activities that could in the future lead to products that compete with us. Xerox could in the future expand these relationships or enter into additional ones and, as a result, our business could be materially adversely affected.

Our growth is dependent upon successfully protecting our proprietary rights.

     We rely on a combination of copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets, confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to protect our proprietary rights. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for unauthorized third-partiesthird parties to copy portions of our products or use information we consider proprietary. Policing unauthorized use of our products is difficult and, while we are unable to determine the extent to which piracy of our software products exists, software piracy can be expected to be a persistent problem. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States. We can notcannot assure you that our means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate or that our competitors will not independently develop similar technology.

     We are not aware thatof any infringement of our products infringe upon the proprietary rights of third parties. We can notHowever, we cannot assure you however, that third parties will not claim infringement by us with respect to current or future products. We expect that software product developers will increasingly be subject to infringement claims as the number of products and competitors in our industry segment grows and the functionality of products in different industry segments overlaps. Any such claims, with or without merit, could be time consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or at all, which could have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our growth is dependent upon successfully focusing our distribution channels.

     We intend to streamline our worldwide sales and distribution channels by focusing on key target industry market segments where our current and planned products enjoy a significant competitive advantage and a current, high market demand. We also plan on leveraging our existing relationships with Xerox, IBM and their channels and affiliates by launching targeted joint marketing and value added reseller programs and by

8


introducing new product offerings that are optimized for selected target markets and marketing channels. In addition, we intend to form additional partnerships with system integrators and consultants in order to broaden our capacity to deliver complete document automation solutions that incorporate significant services content, while also maintaining our core domain expertise. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully streamline and focus our worldwide channels, leverage our existing relationships or form new alliances. If we fail to do so, it will have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Maintaining our professional services expertise is necessary for our future growth.

     We are continuing our focus on the consulting services component of our professional services to assist customers in the planning and implementation of enterprise-wide, mission-critical document automation applications. This strategy is dependent on retaining and hiring professionals to perform these consulting services. Should we be unable to maintain the necessary services workforce, our business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our growth depends on our ability to compete successfully against current and future competitors.

     The market for our document automation products is intensely competitive. We face competition from a broad range of competitors, many of whom have greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. Our principal competition currently comes from systems developed in-house by the internal MIS

9


departments of large organizations and direct competition from numerous software vendors, including Docucorp International, Inc., Metavente and Group 1 Software, Inc. We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting our market include product performance and functionality, ease of use, scalability, operating across multiple computer and operating system platforms, product and company reputation, client service and support and price. Although we believe that we currently compete favorably with respect to such factors, we can notcannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our competitive position against current and future competitors, especially those with greater financial, technical and marketing resources than us, or that we will be successful in the face of increasing competition from new products, new solutions introduced by existing competitors or by new companies entering the market.

Our growth depends on market acceptance of enhancements to our existing products and our introduction of new products and enhancements to existing products.

     Our future business, operating results and financial condition will depend upon market acceptance of our existing products, as well as our ability to respond to emerging industry standards and practices and to develop new products that address the future needs of our target markets and to respond to emerging industry standards and practices.markets. OurDocument Sciences Autographfamily of products has been applied mainly to document automation applications producing paper-based documents. We believe thathave started to extend our core technology can be extended to the Internet, intranets and commercial on-line services, andservices. However, we have begun development activity and released some products in these areas. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in developing, introducing and marketing new products or product enhancements, including new products or the extension of existing products for the Internet, intranets and commercial on-line services, on a timely and cost effective basis, if at all. In addition, we cannot assure you that our new products and product enhancements will adequately meet the requirements of the marketplace or achieve market acceptance. Delays in our commercial shipments of new products or enhancements may result in client dissatisfaction and a delay or loss of product revenues.

     If we are unable, for technological or other reasons we are unable to develop and introduce new products or enhancements of existing products in a timely manner in response to changing market conditions or client requirements, then our business, operating results and financial condition wouldwill be materially adversely affected. In addition, we cannot assure you that our existing products, new products or new versions of our existing products will achieve market acceptance. In order to provide our customers with integrated product solutions, our future success will also depend in part upon our ability to maintain and enhance relationships with our technology partners.

9


A longer than expected sales cycle may affect our revenues and operating results.

     The licensing of our software products is often involves an enterprise-wide decision making process by prospective customers andpotential customers. Sales cycles generally involves a sales cycle ofrange from three to twelve months in order to educate thempotential customers regarding the use and benefits of our products. In addition, the implementation of our products by customers involves a significant commitment of their resources over an extended period of time and is commonly associated with substantial customer business process reengineering efforts. For these and other reasons, our sales and customer implementation cycles are subject to a number of significant delays over which we have little or no control. Any delay in the sale or customer implementation of a limited number of license transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition and cause our operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter.

Our operating results are substantially dependent on sales of a small number of products in highly concentrated industries.

     We derived 72%66% of our initial license revenue from CompuSet and related CompuSet option products in 2000. Our2001. In 2001, our initial license fees from DLS and Electronic Document Viewing products comprised 24%33% and 4%1%, respectively, in 2000.respectively. As a result, factors that may adversely impact the pricing of or demand for CompuSet and related products, such as competition from other products, negative publicity or obsolescence of the hardware or software environments in which our products run, could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our financial performance will continue to depend

10


significantly on the successful development, introduction and customer acceptance of new and enhanced versions of our CompuSet software and related products.

     Our revenues are derived from sales to a small number of industries. Licenses to end users in the insurance, finance and commercial print services industries as follows:

• Licenses to end users in the insurance, finance and commercial print services industries for 2000 accounted for 90% of initial license revenues;
• Licenses to end users in these industries for 1999 accounted for 82% of initial license revenues; and
• Licenses to end users in these industries for 1998 accounted for 72% of initial license revenues.
accounted for 82%, 90% and 97% of initial license revenues in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.

     Our future success will depend on our ability to continue to successfully market our products in these and other industries. We cannot assure you that we will continue to be successful in developing and marketing CompuSet products and related services. Our failure to do so would have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may be exposed to risks associated with international operations.

     Our revenues from export sales, including sales through our foreign subsidiary, accounted for the following:

• 28% of our total revenues in 2000;
• 25% of our total revenues in 1999; and
• 31% of our total revenues in 1998.
25%, 28% and 21% of our total revenues in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively.

     Our wholly owned subsidiary, Document Sciences Europe, markets and supports our products in Europe. We license our products in Europe through value added resellersVAR’s and to a much lesser extent, direct sales. Our VARs are principally Xerox affiliates who re-market our products. Revenues generated through European resellers were $4.5 million, $3.7 million, and $3.9 million and $2.7 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. In Canada, Australia and Brazil, we distribute our products through Xerox Canada, Ltd., Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. and Xerox do Brazil, Ltd., respectively. Revenues generated by these Xerox affiliates were $1.7$2.4 million, $2.4 million and $2.4$2.1 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. In order to successfully expand export sales, we may need to establish additional foreign operations, hire additional personnel and develop relationships with additional international resellers. If we are unable to do so in a timely manner, our growth in international export sales could be limited and our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain or increase international market demand for our products.

     Additional risks inherent in our international business activities include:

 • currency fluctuations;
 
 • unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
 
 • tariffs and other trade barriers;

10


 • our limited experience in localizing products for foreign countries;
 
 • lack of acceptance of our localized products in foreign countries;
 
 • longer accounts receivable payment cycles;
 
 • difficulties in managing our international operations;
 
 • potentially adverse tax consequences including restrictions on the repatriation of earnings; and
 
 • the burdens of complying with a wide variety of foreign laws.

     A portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar, primarily the French Franc and Euro. Although exchange rate fluctuations have not had a significant impact on us, fluctuations in

11


the value of the currencies in which we conduct our business relative to the U.S. Dollar could cause currency transaction gains and losses in future periods. We do not currently engage in currency hedging transactions, and we cannot assure you that fluctuations in currency exchange rates in the future will not have a material adverse impact on our international revenues, business, operating results and financial condition.

Our business is dependent on the market for document automation software.

     The market for document automation software is intensely competitive, highly fragmented under-developed and subject to rapid change. Marketing and sales techniques in the document automation software marketplace, as well as the bases for competition, are not well established. We cannot assure you that the market for document automation software will developgrow or that, if it does develop,grow, organizations will adopt our products. We have spent, and intend to continue to spend, significant resources educating potential customers about the benefits of our products. However, we cannot assure you that such expenditures will enable our products to achieve further market acceptance. Furthermore,Moreover, if the document automation software market fails to developgrow or developsgrows more slowly than we currently anticipate, our business, operating results and financial condition would be materially adversely affected.

     In addition, the commercial market for document automation of electronic documents designed for use with the Internet, intranets and commercial on-line services has only recently begun to develop, and the success of our products designed for these markets will depend in part on theirthe compatibility of our products with such services. It is difficult to predict whether the Internet, intranets and commercial on-line services will be viable commercial marketplaces or whether the demand for related products and services will increase or decrease in the future. Since the increased commercial use of the Internet, intranets and commercial on-line services could require substantial modification and customization of certain of our products and services as well as the introduction of new products and services, we cannot assure you that we will be able to effectively or successfully compete in this market.

Our ability to manage future change will affect our business.

     Our ability to compete effectively and to manage future change will require us to continue to improve our financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures on a timely basis and to expand, train and manage our work force. We cannot assure you that we will be able to do so successfully. Our failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

Our executive officers and certain key personnel are critical to our business, and these officers and key personnel may not remain with us in the future.

     Our future performance depends in significant partsignificantly upon the continued service of our key technical, sales and senior management personnel. Only our presidentPresident and chief executive officerChief Executive Officer and our chief scientistChief Scientist have signed employment agreements with us. The loss of the services of one or more of our executive officers or key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. Our future success also depends on our continuing ability to attract and retain highly qualified product development, sales and management personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain our key employees or that we will be able to attract, assimilate or retain other highly qualified product development, sales and managerial personnel in the future.

11


Our failure to adequately limit our exposure to product liability claims may adversely affect us.

     Our license agreements with our customers typically contain provisions designed to limit our exposure to potential product liability claims. However, it is possible that the limitation of liability provisions contained in our license agreements may not be effective under the laws of certain jurisdictions. Although we have not experienced any product liability claims to date, sale and support of our products may entail the risk of such claims in the future. A successful product liability claim brought against us or a claim arising as a result of our professional services could have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.

12


Our products may suffer from defects or errors.

     SoftwareOur software products asare complex as those we offer,and may contain undetected defects or errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. As a result, we could in the future lose or delay recognition of revenues as a result of software errors or defects. In addition, our products are typically intended for use in applications that may be critical to a customer’s business. As a result, we expect that our customers and potential customers have a greater sensitivity to product defects than the general market for software products. Although our business has not been adversely affected by any such errors to date, we cannot assure you that, despite our testing by us and testing by current and potential customers, errors will not be found in our new products or releases. If these errors are discovered after the commencement of commercial shipments, it could result in any of the following:

 • loss of revenue or delay in market acceptance;
 
 • diversion of our development resources;
 
 • damage to our reputation; or
 
 • increased service and warranty costs.

     If any of these events occur, it would have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.

We may face risks from the Euro.

      In January 1999, a new currency called the “Euro” was introduced in certain Economic and Monetary Union, or EMU, countries. During 2002, all EMU countries are expected to be operating with the Euro as their single currency. Uncertainty exists as to the effects the Euro will have on the marketplace. Additionally, all of the final rules and regulations have not yet been defined and finalized by the European Commission with regard to the Euro. We are still assessing the impact the EMU formation will have on our internal systems and the sale of our products. We expect to take appropriate actions based on the results of such assessment. We have not yet determined any potential costs.

Item 2.     Properties

     We lease approximately 27,30021,300 square feet for our principal administrative, sales, marketing, training and research and development facilitiesfacility in Carlsbad, California. These leases expireThis lease expires on October 14, 2001 and February 28, 2005. Our subsidiary in France occupies approximately 2,200 square feet of office space with a renewable lease expiring on April 15, 2004. In addition, our regional office in Milwaukee, Wisconsin occupies approximately 7,500 square feet of office space pursuant to a lease expiring on March 31, 2003. Sales representatives and field technical support personnel operate from their homes.

Item 3.     Legal Proceedings

     In the ordinary course of business, we may become involved in legal proceedings from time to time. As of March 15, 2001,February 22, 2002, we were not a party, nor was our property subject, to any material pending legal proceedings.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

     No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2000.2001.

1312


PART II

Item 5.     Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters

     Our common stock is traded on The Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “DOCX.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices of our common stock for the periods indicated, as reported on The Nasdaq National Market System. Such quotations represent inter-dealer prices without retail markup, markdown or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

           
Price RangePrice Range


HighLowHighLow




Fiscal 1999
 
First quarter ended March 31, 1999 $2.88 $1.63 
Second quarter ended June 30, 1999 $2.25 $1.25 
Third quarter ended September 30, 1999 $2.25 $1.69 
Fourth quarter ended December 31, 1999 $4.22 $1.31 
Fiscal 2000
  
First quarter ended March 31, 2000 $6.25 $2.94  $6.25 $2.94 
Second quarter ended June 30, 2000 $4.34 $2.06  $4.34 $2.06 
Third quarter ended September 30, 2000 $2.50 $1.34  $2.50 $1.34 
Fourth quarter ended December 31, 2000 $1.50 $0.59  $1.50 $0.59 
Fiscal 2001
 
First quarter ended March 31, 2001 $1.88 $0.75 
Second quarter ended June 30, 2001 $2.11 $1.30 
Third quarter ended September 30, 2001 $4.49 $1.43 
Fourth quarter ended December 31, 2001 $3.40 $2.30 

     We had 10,835,1393,867,906 shares outstanding and 107103 record holders of our common stock as of December 31, 2000.February 27, 2002. We did not make any sales of unregistered stock in 2000.1999, 2000 or 2001. We have not paid dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future.

Item 6.     Selected Financial Data

     The following table presents selected financial data of Document Sciences Corporation. This historical data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related notes thereto in Item 8 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7.

                            
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,


1996199719981999200019971998199920002001










(In thousands, except per share data)(In thousands, except per share data)
Statement of Operations
  
Net revenues $15,319 $19,740 $20,107 $24,305 $22,579  $19,740 $20,107 $24,305 $22,579 $22,120 
Income (loss) from operations 1,665 (58) (10,361) 1,366 (416) (58) (10,361) 1,366 (416) 359 
Net income (loss) 1,361 838 (9,154) 2,111 531  838 (9,154) 2,111 531 638 
Net income (loss) per share .14 .08 (.86) .20 .05  0.08 (0.86) 0.20 0.05 0.11 
Shares used in per share calculations 9,615 11,013 10,690 10,817 11,153  11,013 10,690 10,817 11,153 5,831 
Balance Sheet
  
Working capital $25,807 $23,896 $14,883 $16,611 $17,151  $23,896 $14,883 $16,611 $17,151 $5,036 
Total assets 32,022 34,229 30,989 30,423 31,496  34,229 30,989 30,423 31,496 19,706 
Capital lease obligations, less current
portion
 116 52 13 1 0  52 13 1   
Stockholders’ equity 26,910 27,691 18,410 20,280 21,134  27,691 18,410 20,280 21,134 7,700 

1413


Item 7.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview and Recent Developments

     Document Sciences Corporation develops, marketsWe develop, market and supportssupport a family of document automation software used in high volume electronic publishing applications. We were incorporated in Delaware in October 1991 as a wholly owned subsidiary of Xerox Corporation. Following our initial public offering of stock in September 1996, Xerox ownership was reduced to approximately 62%.

      On February 16, 2001, we made As a selfresult of our tender offer for 6,000,000 sharesand our exercise of our outstanding common stock. Xerox tendered all of its shares of Document Sciences common stock in the offer. The tender offer expired on March 23, 2001 and was oversubscribed. We are currently calculating the proration factors and will close the tender offer shortly. Xerox also granted us an option to purchase up to 2,000,000 additional shares of our stock it owned after completion of the tender offer at the tender offer price so long as its ownership after the exercise of the option is at least 19.9% of our outstanding common stock. We currently expect to exercise the option to the extent required to reducefrom Xerox in April 2001, Xerox’s ownership interest has been reduced to 19.9% of.

Critical Accounting Policies

     We believe the following represent our stock. The purchase would be financed with a promissory note.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 1998, 1999 and 2000

  Revenuescritical accounting policies:

     Total revenues were $20.1 million, $24.3 million and $22.6 million in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively, representing an increase of 21% from 1998 to 1999 and a decrease of 7% from 1999 to 2000. Our revenues are divided into three categories based upon the sources from which they are derived: initial license fees, annual renewal license and support fees, and services and other revenues. Initial license fees are comprised primarily of license fees for the first year of use of our products. Annual renewal license and support fees are comprised of license fees for the continued use and support of our licensed products. Services and other revenues are comprised of fees for consulting, application development and training services performed by us as well as miscellaneous other operational revenues. Revenue Recognition.We recognize revenue in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position (SOP)SOP 97-2,Software Revenue Recognitionand Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)SAB No. 101,Revenue Recognition in Financial StatementsStatements.. Initial license fees are recognized when a contract exists, the fee is fixed orand determinable, software delivery has occurred and collection of the receivable is deemed probable. Any portion of the initial license fee representing the software support for the first year is deferred and recognized ratably over the contract period. Annual renewal license and support fees are recognized ratably over the contract period. Revenues generated from consulting services are recognized as the related services are performed. However, when such consulting services are deemed to be essential to the functionality of the delivered software product, revenue from the entire arrangement is recognized on a percentage of completion method or not until the contract is completed in accordance with SOP 81-1,Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, and Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)ARB No. 45,Long-Term Construction-Type ContractsContracts..

     Our operating expenses are primarily based on anticipated revenue levels. Since a high percentage of those expenses are relatively fixed, a delay in the recognition of revenue from license transactions could cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter and we may sustain losses as a result. Since revenue may not be recognized in the same quarter as when shipment occurs and if such fixed expenses precede these revenues, our operating results would be materially adversely affected.

Computer Software Costs.In accordance with SFAS No. 86,Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed, costs incurred in the research and development of new software products and significant enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until the technological feasibility of the product has been established. After technological feasibility has been established, direct production costs, including programming and testing, are capitalized until general release of the product.

     Capitalized costs of software to be sold, licensed or otherwise marketed are amortized using the greater of the amount computed using the ratio of current period product revenues to estimated total product revenues or the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic lives of the products. It is possible that estimated total product revenues, the estimated economic life of the product, or both, will be reduced in the future. As a result, the carrying amount of capitalized software costs may be reduced in the future, which could cause our operating results in future periods to be adversely affected.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 1999, 2000 and 2001

Revenues

     Total revenues were $24.3 million, $22.6 million and $22.1 million in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively, representing decreases of 7% from 1999 to 2000 and 2% from 2000 to 2001. Our revenues are divided into three categories based upon the sources from which they are derived: initial license fees, annual renewal license and support fees, and services and other revenues. Initial license fees consist primarily of license fees for the first year of use of our products. Annual renewal license and support fees consist of license fees for the continued use and support of our licensed products. Services and other revenues consist of fees for consulting, application development and training services performed by us as well as miscellaneous other operational revenues.

14


     We sell our products principally through our direct sales force domestically, and internationally through distributors and value added resellers or VARs.(VARs). Revenues from export sales and sales through our foreign subsidiary were $6.2 million, $6.1 million, and $6.3 million and $4.7 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing a decrease of 2% from 1998 to 1999 and an increase of 3% from 1999 to 2000.2000 and a decrease of 25% from 2000 to 2001. Revenue from export sales were 31%25%, 25%28% and 28%21% of total revenues in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. The decrease from 2000 respectively.to 2001 was the result of lower initial license fees in all regions. The increase from 1999 to 2000 iswas primarily the result of increased revenues through our Xerox affiliates in Australia and Europe. The decrease from 1998 to 1999 is primarily the result of decreased activity associated with an internal realignment of our foreign subsidiary.

      Until September 30, 1999, we had a strategic marketing alliance with Xerox under which both parties agreed to pay each other fees on referrals that lead to the successful sale or licensing of each other’s products. Our revenues from this strategic marketing alliance were $344,000, $287,000 and $0 in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. These commissions were 2%, 1% and 0% of total revenues in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. No commissions were paid relating to referrals from Xerox in 1998, 1999 and 2000.

15


     We have entered into distributorship agreements with various Xerox foreign affiliates to remarket our products internationally. Our revenues from these agreements were $4.1 million, $4.6 million, and $4.7 million and $3.7 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively. The decrease from 2000 respectively.to 2001 was the result of lower initial license fees in all regions. The increase from 1999 to 2000 iswas primarily the result of increased revenues through our Xerox affiliates in Australia and Europe. The increase from 1998 to 1999 is primarily the result of increased revenues through our Xerox affiliate in Brazil.

     Initial license fees.Initial license fees were $7.2 million, $10.4 million, and $10.3 million and $8.2 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing an increase of 44% from 1998 to 1999 and a decreasedecreases of 1% from 1999 to 2000.2000 and 20% from 2000 to 2001. The decreasedecreases in 2001 and 2000 was mainlywere largely the result of decreased revenuesfewer sales and fewer new customers from our foreign resellers. The increase in 1999 was mainly due to increased sales by our direct sales force in the United States. Initial license revenues were 36%43%, 43%46% and 46%37% of total revenues in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

     Annual renewal license and support fees.Annual renewal license fees were $5.9 million, $7.6 million, and $8.6 million and $8.7 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing increases of 29% from 1998 to 1999 and 13% from 1999 to 2000.2000 and 1% from 2000 to 2001. The increase in 2001 was largely offset by the impact of discontinuing support for certain products and platforms. These increases in license renewal and support fees were principally due to an increase in the installed base of users of our software products. Annual license fees were 29%31%, 31%38% and 38%39% of total revenues in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

     Services and other.Revenues from services and other were $7.0 million, $6.3 million, and $3.7 million and $5.2 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing decreasesa decrease of 10% from 1998 to 1999 and 41% from 1999 to 2000. These decreases were2000 and an increase of 41% from 2000 to 2001. The increase in 2001 is due to the delivery of consulting services needed to implement new product sales made since the fourth quarter of 2000 as well as significant services to existing customers. The decrease in 2000 was principally due to the mix of software being sold, much of which did not require as muchonly required minimal consulting services in order to be implemented.at implementation. Revenues from services and other were 35%26%, 26%16% and 16%24% of total revenues in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

Cost of Revenues and Operating Expenses

     Cost of initial license fees.Costs of initial license fees were $1.4 million, $1.4$1.6 million and $1.6$1.5 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing 19%13%, 13%16% and 16%18% of initial license fees in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. Cost of initial license fees includes documentation, reproduction costs, product packaging and media, employment costs for installation and distribution personnel, the cost of third party software and amortization of previously capitalized software development costs. The increase asdecrease in 2001 compared to 2000 was due to lower sales and a percentagedecrease in the amortization of revenuesoftware. The increase in 2000 fromcompared to 1999 was primarily the result of expensing the remainder of the capitalized software costs of Visual CompuSet Professional EditionVCPro 2.0 due to the 4th quarter 2000 release of Visual CompuSet Professional EditionVCPro 3.0. The decrease as a percentage of revenue in 1999 from 1998 was primarily due to savings realized from our restructuring.

     Cost of annual renewal license and support fees.Costs of annual license fees were $862,000, $947,000, and $1.3 million 1998,and $1.5 million 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing 15%13%, 13%15% and 15%17% of annual license fees in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. Costs of annual renewal license fees consist principally of the employment-related costs for our technical support staff. The increase in cost2001 compared to 2000 was due to additional technical support personnel necessary to support our increasing customer base. The increase in 2000 fromcompared to 1999 iswas due to the implementation of a new technical support database and additional technical support personnel necessary to support our increasing customer base. The increase in cost in 1999 from 1998 is due to additional technical support personnel necessary to support our increasing customer base.

     Cost of services and other.Costs of services and other were $4.3 million, $3.6 million, and $2.5 million and $3.0 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing 62%58%, 58%68% and 68%58% of services and other revenue in 1998, 1999, 2000

15


and 2000,2001, respectively. Costs of services and other consist principally of the employment-related costs of our consulting and training staff. The increase in 2001 compared to 2000 was primarily due to additional personnel costs and the greater use of outside consultants to complete our increased consulting work in 2001. The decrease in 2000 compared to 1999 was primarily due to attrition and transferring underutilized personnel to other departments. The decrease in 1999 was primarily due to savings realized from our restructuring.

     Research and development.Research and development expenses were $4.3 million, $4.7 million, and $4.2 million and $5.2 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing an increase of 9% from 1998 to 1999 and a decrease of 11% from 1999 to 2000.2000 and an increase of 24% from 2000 to 2001. Research and development expenses consist primarily of the employment-related costs of personnel associated with developing new products, enhancing existing products, testing software products and developing product documentation. As a percentage of total revenue, research and

16


development expenses were 22%19%, 19%18% and 18%24% in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. We anticipate that we will continue to direct significant resources to the development and enhancement of our products.
In connection with a development services and referral agreement effective January 16, 2002, we have signed a two-year agreement with Objectiva Software Solutions, Inc. to provide us development services, which could range up to $3.1 million.

      We expense all costs for research and development of new products until technological feasibility has been assured. Thereafter, costs of software development are capitalized until general release of the product. The capitalized costs of software development are amortized using the greater of the amount computed using the ratio of current product revenues to estimated total product revenues or the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic life of the product.     We capitalized software development costs of $644,000, $643,000, and $1.2 million and $717,000 in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. The increaseSome of the new products started in 2000 is due2001 have yet to the release of two major products, Visual CompuSet Professional Edition 3.0 and DLS 6.0 and related components.reach technological feasibility. The amount of software development costs to be capitalized in the future may change if the time between the establishment of technological feasibility of a product and its general release changes.

     Selling and marketing.Selling and marketing expenses were $11.4 million, $7.7 million, and $8.4 million and $7.2 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing a decrease of 32% from 1998 to 1999 and an increase of 9% from 1999 to 2000.2000 and a decrease of 14% from 2000 to 2001. Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, commissions, marketing programs and related costs for pre- and post-sales activity. The decrease in 2001 was primarily due to fewer personnel and decreased commissions due to decreased initial license fees. The increase in 2000 was primarily due to increased marketing expenditures on advertising, promotion activities and trade shows. The decrease in 1999 was primarily the result of savings realized from our restructuring and the aligning of our commission structure with our recognition of revenue. Selling and marketing expenses were 56%32%, 32%37% and 37%32% of total revenues in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

     General and administrative.General and administrative expenses were $6.2 million, $4.6 million, and $5.0 million and $3.4 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, representing a decrease of 26% from 1998 to 1999 and an increase of 9% from 1999 to 2000.2000 and a decrease of 32% from 2000 to 2001. General and administrative expenses consist of employment-related costs for finance, administration and human resources, allowance for doubtful accounts and general corporate management expenses, including legal and audit fees. The decrease in 2001 was primarily due to decreased personnel and outside consultant costs. The increase in 2000 was primarily due to an increase in the allowance for doubtful accounts and higher professional fees. The decrease in 1999 was the result of savings realized from our restructuring. General and administrative expenses were 31%19%, 19%22% and 22%15% of total revenues in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

     Restructuring charges.Other income (expense).In connection with a restructuring plan adopted in the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998, we recorded a $2.0 million restructuring charge associated with our actions to reduce our overall cost structure that had become inconsistent with our revenue base. This charge included the termination of 46 employees, the write off of impaired assets and a reduction in our leased facilities.

Interest, net.Interest, netOther income (expense) is composed of interest income from cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments offset by finance chargesinterest expense related to equipment leases. Interest, netnotes to Xerox and losses on disposal of fixed assets. Other income was $901,000, $745,000, $961,000 and $961,000$281,000 in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. The decrease in 2001 was the result of less interest income following a large decrease in our cash balances as a result of our tender offer which was completed in April 2001. The increase in 2000 iswas from higher cash balances. The decrease in 1999 is from lower cash balances due to payments made toward the restructuring charges.which generated higher interest income.

     Provision for income taxes.The provision for income taxes in 2000 and 2001 was for taxes under the alternative minimum tax. Effective tax rates were approximately 3%0%, 3% and 0% in 1999, 2000 and 3% in 1998, 1999 and 2000,2001, respectively. These rates differsdiffer from the federal statutory rate primarily due to the change in the valuation allowances offsetting deferred tax assets.

Factors That May Affect Future Operating Results

     Our total revenues and operating results can vary, sometimes substantially, from quarter to quarter and are expected to vary significantly in the future. Our revenues and operating results are difficult to forecast. Future results will depend upon many factors, including the demand for our products, the level of product and

16


price competition, the length of our sales cycle, the size and timing of individual license transactions, the delay or deferral of customer implementations, the budget cycles of our customers, our success in expanding our direct sales force and indirect distribution channels, the timing of new product introductions and product enhancements by us and our competitors, the mix of products and services sold, levels of international sales, activities of and acquisitions by competitors, the timing of new hires, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, our ability to develop and market new products, controlling costs and general domestic and international

17


economic conditions. In addition, our sales generally reflect a relatively high amount of revenue per order, and, therefore, the loss or delay of individual orders could have a significant impact on our revenues and quarterly operating results. In addition, a significant amount of our revenues occur predominantly in the third month of each fiscal quarter and tend to be concentrated in the latter half of that third month.

     Our software products generally are shipped as orders are received. As a result, initial license fees in any quarter are substantially dependent on orders booked and shipped in that quarter. The timing of receipt of initial license fees is difficult to predict because of the length of our sales cycle, typically three to twelve months from the initial contact. Because our operating expenses are based on anticipated revenue trends and because a high percentage of our expenses are relatively fixed, a delay in the recognition of revenue from a limited number of initial license transactions could cause significant variations in operating results from quarter to quarter and could result in losses. To the extent such expenses precede, or are not subsequently followed by, increased revenues, our operating results could be materially adversely affected.

     Due to the foregoing factors, revenues and operating results for any quarter are subject to significant variation, and we believe that period-to-period comparisons are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     At December 31, 2000,2001, we had $18.6$8.9 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. This is an increasea decrease of $1.3$9.6 million from December 31, 1999,2000, which was used primarily representing cash generated from operating activities less capital expenditures.to purchase 6,000,000 shares of our common stock at $2.00 per share pursuant to our tender offer. On April 16, 2001, we executed two promissory notes payable to Xerox to purchase an additional 1,139,600 shares of our common stock owned by Xerox at $2.00 per share. The principal amount of the first note was $2,000,000 and accrued interest at 9%. This note was due on March 23, 2002. The principal amount of the second note was $279,200 and accrued interest at 9%. This note was due on March 23, 2003. Both of these notes were paid in full on February 15, 2002.

     We believe that our existing cash balances and anticipated cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures at least through the next twelve months. As discussed above in “Overview and Recent Developments,” our self tender offer for cash expired on March 23, 2001. We anticipate purchasing 6,000,000 shares at $2.00 per share, which will reduce our cash balance by $12.0 million to approximately $6.6 million. In addition, we may exercise our option to purchase additional shares from Xerox which would be paid for with a promissory note. A portion of our remaining cash could be used to acquire or invest in complementary businesses or products or obtain the right to use complementary technologies. We are currently evaluating, in our ordinary course of business, potential investments such as businesses, products or technologies. We have no material current understandings, commitments or agreements with respect to any acquisition in whole of other businesses, products or technologies.

     As of December 31, 2000 and 2001, we did not have any other relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partners, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. As such, we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in such relationships.

Recently EnactedIssued Accounting Standards

     In June 1999,July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or FASB,(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 137,141,Accounting for Derivative Instruments Business Combinationsand Hedging Activities — Deferral of Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets., SFAS No. 137.141 requires all business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for by the purchase method. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment.

17


Separate intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life will continue to be amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The Statement defers for one year the effective dateamortization provisions of SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments142 apply to goodwill and Hedging Activities.intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001, we are required to adopt SFAS No. 137 now142 effective January 1, 2002. Effective January 1, 2002, we will apply to all fiscal quartersdiscontinue amortization of all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. goodwill, which will reduce annual operating expenses by approximately $70,000.

In June 1998,August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133,144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which requires usaddresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and supercedes SFAS No. 121,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to recognize all derivatives onbe Disposed Of, and the balance sheet at fair value. Derivatives that are not hedges must be adjusted to fair value through income. Ifaccounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30,Reporting the derivative isResults of Operations for a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portionDisposal of a derivative’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. AsSegment of December 31, 2000, wea Business. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002. We do not hold any derivative instruments, or conduct any hedging activities. Therefore, we do not anticipate any impact to our consolidated financial statements forexpect the adoption of SFAS No. 133 and 137 at January 1, 2001.

      In March 2000, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. (FIN) 44,Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation — an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25. FIN 44 clarifies the definition of an employee for purposes of applying Accounting Practice Board Opinion (APB) No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. APB No. 25 states the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, the accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of a

18


previously fixed stock option or award and the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. FIN 44 became effective on July 1, 2000, but certain conclusions in this Interpretation cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998 or January 12, 2000. FIN 44 did not144 will have a material effectsignificant impact on our operating results and financial position or results of operations.
condition.

Euro Conversion

     In January 1999, a new currency called the “Euro” was introduced in certain Economic and Monetary Union or EMU,(EMU) countries. Our subsidiary, Document Sciences Europe, is based in one of these countries, France. During 2002, allmost EMU countries are expectedconverted to be operating with the Euro as their single currency. Uncertainty exists as toAlthough the effects the Euroconversion has gone smoothly, we cannot assure you that there will have on the marketplace. Additionally, all of the final rules and regulations have not yet been defined and finalized by the European Commission with regard to the Euro. We are still assessing the impact the EMU formation will havebe any future material adverse effects on our internal systems and the sale of our products. We expect to take appropriate actions based on the results of such assessment. We have not yet determined any potential costs.financial position.

Item 7A.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

     Our earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To a certain extent, foreign currency exchange rate movements also affect our competitive position, as exchange rate changes may affect business practices and/or pricing strategies on non-U.S. based competitors. The primary foreign currency risk exposure is related to U.S. Dollar to French Franc and U.S. Dollar to Euro conversions. Considering both the anticipated cash flows from firm sales commitments and anticipated sales for the next quarter, and the foreign currency derivative instruments in place at year end, a hypothetical 10% weakening of the U.S. Dollar relative to all other currencies would not materially adversely affect expected first quarter 20002002 earnings or cash flows. This analysis is dependent on actual export sales during the next quarter occurring within 90% of budgeted forecasts. The effect of the hypothetical change in exchange rates ignores the affect this movement may have on other variables including competitive risk. If it were possible to quantify this competitive impact, the results could well be different than the sensitivity effects described above. In addition, it is unlikely that all currencies would uniformly strengthen or weaken relative to the U.S. Dollar. In reality, some currencies may weaken while others may strengthen. Each month we review our position for expected currency exchange rate movements.

Interest Rate Risk

     We are exposed to changes in interest rates primarily from our short-term available-for-sale investments. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. A hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments at December 31, 2000.2001. Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce our interest income.

Item 8.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     The financial statements and supplementary data required by this item are set forth at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K beginning on page F-1 and is incorporated into this item by reference.

18


Item 9.     Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosure.

     None.

19


PART III

Item 10.     Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

     The information required by this item concerning our directors and certain information regarding our executive officers is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the sections entitled “Election of Directors — Nominees,” “Compensation of Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our Proxy Statement for the 20012002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Executive Officers of Document Sciences

     The executive officers of Document Sciences and their ages, as of March 30, 2001,1, 2002, are as follows:

       
NameAgePosition



John L. McGannon  4041  President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Daniel J. Fregeau  4445  Executive Vice President
J. Douglas Pike  4546  Vice President, Worldwide Sales
Lisa L. Sutrick
38
Vice President, Product Planning and Development

     John L. McGannonhas served as President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2001 and Chief Financial Officer since December 1999. He has also served as Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer and Controller since joining Document Sciences in September 1998. From June 1997 through August 1998, Mr. McGannon served as the Manager of Financial Analysis and Planning for Simulation Sciences, Inc., a California-based software developer for the oil and chemical engineering industries. Mr. McGannon worked for Chevron Corporation from 1988 to 1997 in a variety of financial management positions. Mr. McGannon holds a BA degree from Stanford University and an MBA from Carnegie Mellon University.

     Daniel J. Fregeauhas served as Executive Vice President since January 2001. From 1998 to 2001, he served as Vice President of Worldwide Sales and Business Development, from 1997 to 1998, he served as Vice President, Business Development, from 1994 to 1997, he served as Vice President, Marketing and from 1992 to 1994, he served as Vice President, Sales. Prior to joining Document Sciences, Mr. Fregeau was Marketing Manager for the Networking Division of Sears Business Centers, San Diego, from 1990 to 1992. Mr. Fregeau was a founder and principal of MicroAge in San Diego from 1988 to 1990. From 1982 to 1988, Mr. Fregeau held several positions with Xerox Corporation’s Electronic Publishing Business Unit including Manager of Systems Engineering and Integration, Technical Program Manager and Project Manager. While at Xerox, Mr. Fregeau designed and directed the development of several publishing products and was a key contributor to the launch of the XICS (now CompuSet) product in the U.S. and Canada.

     J. Douglas Pikehas served as Vice President, Worldwide Sales since January 2001. He has alsohad previously served as Director of US Sales and Area Sales Manager since joining Document Sciences in January 1995. From 1990 to 1994, Mr. Pike was employed by Xerox Corporation to provide digital printing solutions to major accounts in the insurance and finance industries. Mr. Pike also worked for Unisys Corporation for seven years providing custom software application and database solutions as an account executive. Mr. Pike holds a B.S. degree in Industrial Technology from the State University of New York.

     Lisa L. Sutrickhas served as Vice President, Product Planning and Development since January 2002. She had previously served in the capacities of Director of Product Planning and Development, Director of Product Marketing, Product Marketing Manager for Document Library Services and Program Manager in Development since joining Document Sciences in May 1997. From 1987 to 1997, Ms. Sutrick worked for Data Retrieval Corporation, a Wisconsin software company purchased by Document Sciences in May 1997, in a

19


variety of customer focused software development positions. Ms. Sutrick holds a B.S. degree in Applied Mathematics from the University of Wisconsin, Stout.

Executive officers are appointed by the Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board. There are no family relationships among any directors or executive officers of Document Sciences.

Item 11.     Executive Compensation

     The information required by this item regarding executive compensation is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the sections entitled “Executive Officer Compensation” and “Compensation of Directors” in our Proxy Statement for the 20012002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 12.     Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

     The information required by this item regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the section entitled “Security

20


Ownership of Management and Certain Beneficial Owners” in our Proxy Statement for the 20012002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Item 13.     Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

     The information required by this item regarding certain relationships and related transactions is incorporated by reference to the information set forth in the section entitled “Certain Transactions” in our Proxy Statement for the 20012002 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

PART IV

Item 14.     Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K

     (a) The following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-K:

      1.Financial Statements.The financial statements, related notes thereto and the Report of Independent Auditors required hereunder are set forth at the end of this Annual Report beginning on the page F-1.
 
      2.Financial Statement Schedule.The following financial statement schedule for the fiscal years ended December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 20002001 is filed as part of this Form 10-K and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.
 
      Schedule II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
 
      Schedules other than those listed above have been omitted since they are either not required, not applicable or the information is otherwise included.
 
      3.Exhibits.See Item 14(c) below.

     (b) Reports on Form 8-K.No reports on Form 8-K were filed by us during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2000.2001.

     (c) Exhibits.The exhibits listed on the accompanying index to exhibits immediately following the financial statement schedules are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Form 10-K.

     (d) Financial Statement Schedules.See Item 14(a) above.

2120


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on this 30th1st day of March 2001.2002.

 DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

 By: /s/ JOHN L. MCGANNON


 John L. McGannon
 President and Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

Dated: March 30, 20011, 2002

POWER OF ATTORNEY

     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints John L. McGannon his attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution, for him in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this Form 10-K, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact or his substitute, may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant andon March 1, 2002 in the capacities and on March 30, 2001 in the capacities indicated:

   
SignaturesTitle


/s/ JOHN L. MCGANNON

John L. McGannon
 President, Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
(principal (principal executive, financial and
accounting officer)
/s/ THOMAS L. RINGER

Thomas L. Ringer
 Chairman of the Board of Directors
/s/ BARTON L. FABER

Barton L. Faber
 Director
/s/ CHARLES P. HOLT

Charles P. Holt
Director
/s/ COLIN J. O’BRIEN

Colin J. O’Brien
 Director
/s/ BRIAN E. STERNJAMES J. COSTELLO

Brian E. SternJames J. Costello
 Director

2221


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

     
Page

Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors  F-2 
Consolidated Balance Sheets  F-3 
Consolidated Statements of OperationsIncome  F-4 
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity  F-5 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  F-6 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements  F-7 

F-1


REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Document Sciences Corporation

     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Document Sciences Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 19992000 and 2000,2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations,income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000.2001. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Document Sciences Corporation at December 31, 19992000 and 2000,2001, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2000,2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

 /s/  ERNST & YOUNG LLP

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

San Diego, California

January 26, 2001, except for Note 12
for which the date is February 16, 200118, 2002

F-2


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS

                   
December 31,December 31,


1999200020002001




ASSETSASSETS
Current assets:Current assets: Current assets: 
Cash and cash equivalents $3,746,357 $4,768,520 Cash and cash equivalents $4,768,520 $3,187,229 
Short-term investments 13,528,662 13,783,595 Short-term investments 13,783,595 5,736,200 
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $765,873 and $1,012,177 in 1999 and 2000, respectively 6,063,873 6,084,249 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,012,177 and $427,683 in 2000 and 2001, respectively 6,084,249 5,028,059 
Due from affiliates 1,878,114 1,604,097 Due from affiliates 1,604,097 1,739,739 
Unbilled revenue 308,063 269,428 Unbilled revenue 269,428 400,164 
Other current assets 913,453 779,018 Other current assets 779,018 519,163 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total current assets 26,438,522 27,288,907 
Total current assetsTotal current assets 27,288,907 16,610,554 
Property and equipment, netProperty and equipment, net 1,787,245 1,930,699 Property and equipment, net 1,930,699 1,178,600 
Computer software costs, net of accumulated amortization of $1,547,871 and $2,706,041 in 1999 and 2000, respectively 1,332,048 1,364,636 
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $186,998 and $257,121 in 1999 and 2000, respectively 864,863 794,739 
Computer software costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,706,041 and $1,288,326 in 2000 and 2001, respectivelyComputer software costs, net of accumulated amortization of $2,706,041 and $1,288,326 in 2000 and 2001, respectively 1,364,636 1,143,618 
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $257,121 and $327,246 in 2000 and 2001, respectivelyGoodwill, net of accumulated amortization of $257,121 and $327,246 in 2000 and 2001, respectively 794,739 724,615 
Other assetsOther assets  117,413 Other assets 117,413 48,785 
 
 
   
 
 
 $30,422,678 $31,496,394   $31,496,394 $19,706,172 
 
 
   
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYLIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITYLIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:Current liabilities: Current liabilities: 
Accounts payable $605,038 $332,893 Accounts payable $332,893 $191,919 
Accrued compensation 1,876,813 953,195 Accrued compensation 953,195 881,791 
Other accrued liabilities 695,754 532,858 Other accrued liabilities 532,858 520,599 
Deferred revenue 6,638,681 8,319,390 Deferred revenue 8,319,390 7,851,670 
Current portion of obligations under capital leases 11,376  Short-term notes  2,128,219 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total current liabilities 9,827,662 10,138,336 
Obligations under capital leases 1,244  
Deferred revenue 313,669 224,049 
Total current liabilitiesTotal current liabilities 10,138,336 11,574,198 
Long-term notesLong-term notes  297,099 
Deferred revenue — long-termDeferred revenue — long-term 224,049 134,430 
CommitmentsCommitments Commitments 
Stockholders’ equity:Stockholders’ equity: Stockholders’ equity: 
Common stock, $.001 par value; Authorized shares — 30,000,000; Issued and outstanding shares — 10,744,169 in 1999 and 10,835,139 in 2000 10,919 10,923 Common stock, $.001 par value; Authorized shares — 30,000,000; 
Deferred compensation (10,794)  Issued shares — 10,923,101 in 2000 and 3,824,896 in 2001 10,923 3,825 
Treasury stock (609,983) (503,273)Treasury stock — 87,962 and 0 in 2000 and 2001 (503,273)  
Additional paid-in capital 25,425,809 25,436,306 Additional paid-in capital 25,436,306 10,781,055 
Accumulated comprehensive income (loss) (186,500) 8,462 Accumulated comprehensive income 8,462 95,514 
Retained deficit (4,349,348) (3,818,409)Retained deficit (3,818,409) (3,179,949)
 
 
   
 
 
Total stockholders’ equityTotal stockholders’ equity 21,134,009 7,700,445 
 Total stockholders’ equity 20,280,103 21,134,009   
 
 
 
 
   $31,496,394 $19,706,172 
 $30,422,678 $31,496,394   
 
 
 
 
 

See accompanying notes.

F-3


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSINCOME

                           
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,


199819992000199920002001






Revenues:Revenues: Revenues: 
Initial license fees (including $2,987,600, $3,138,700 and $2,671,800 from affiliates in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively) $7,186,247 $10,405,839 $10,257,633 Initial license fees (including $3,138,700, $2,671,800 and $1,717,700 from affiliates in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively) $10,405,839 $10,257,633 $8,200,159 
Annual renewal license and support fees (including $1,234,300, $1,604,600 and $2,235,700 from affiliates in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively) 5,889,410 7,607,077 8,620,958 Annual renewal license and support fees (including $1,604,600, $2,235,700 and $2,182,500 from affiliates in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively) 7,607,077 8,620,958 8,707,247 
Services and other (including $1,184,800, $430,300 and $279,900 from affiliates in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively) 7,031,693 6,292,324 3,700,336 Services and other (including $430,300, $279,900 and $224,500 from affiliates in 1999, 2000 and 2001, respectively) 6,292,324 3,700,336 5,212,231 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total revenues 20,107,350 24,305,240 22,578,927 
Total revenuesTotal revenues 24,305,240 22,578,927 22,119,637 
Cost of revenues:Cost of revenues: Cost of revenues: 
Initial license fees 1,367,939 1,375,892 1,643,617 Initial license fees 1,375,892 1,643,617 1,495,073 
Annual renewal license and support fees 862,058 947,445 1,311,196 Annual renewal license and support fees 947,445 1,311,196 1,498,664 
Services and other 4,344,896 3,628,909 2,501,372 Services and other 3,628,909 2,501,372 2,992,555 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total cost of revenues 6,574,893 5,952,246 5,456,185 
Total cost of revenuesTotal cost of revenues 5,952,246 5,456,185 5,986,292 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Gross profitGross profit 13,532,457 18,352,994 17,122,742 Gross profit 18,352,994 17,122,742 16,133,345 
Operating expenses:Operating expenses: Operating expenses: 
Research and development 4,336,116 4,679,067 4,154,364 Research and development 4,679,067 4,154,364 5,203,525 
Selling and marketing 11,353,604 7,680,764 8,358,577 Selling and marketing 7,680,764 8,358,577 7,151,651 
General and administrative 6,214,275 4,626,854 5,025,417 General and administrative 4,626,854 5,025,417 3,418,823 
Restructuring charges 1,988,983     
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total operating expenses 23,892,978 16,986,685 17,538,358 
Total operating expensesTotal operating expenses 16,986,685 17,538,358 15,773,999 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Income (loss) from operationsIncome (loss) from operations (10,360,521) 1,366,309 (415,616)Income (loss) from operations 1,366,309 (415,616) 359,346 
Interest, net 900,755 744,566 960,581 
Interest and other income, netInterest and other income, net 744,566 960,581 280,921 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes (9,459,766) 2,110,875 544,965 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (306,168)  14,026 
Income before provision for income taxesIncome before provision for income taxes 2,110,875 544,965 640,267 
Provision for income taxesProvision for income taxes  14,026 1,807 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net income (loss) $(9,153,598) $2,110,875 $530,939 
Net incomeNet income $2,110,875 $530,939 $638,460 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net income (loss) per share — basic $(.86) $.20 $.05 
Net income per share — basicNet income per share — basic $0.20 $0.05 $0.12 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Weighted average shares used in basic calculationWeighted average shares used in basic calculation 10,690,340 10,693,888 10,771,588 Weighted average shares used in basic calculation 10,693,888 10,771,588 5,547,872 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net income (loss) per share — diluted $(.86) $.20 $.05 
Net income per share — dilutedNet income per share — diluted $0.20 $0.05 $0.11 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Weighted average shares used in diluted calculationWeighted average shares used in diluted calculation 10,690,340 10,816,948 11,153,893 Weighted average shares used in diluted calculation 10,816,948 11,153,893 5,830,728 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

See accompanying notes.

F-4


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
                                  
Accumulated
Common StockTreasury StockAdditionalComprehensiveRetained


Paid-inDeferredIncomeEarnings
SharesAmountSharesAmountCapitalCompensation(Loss)(Deficit)








Balance at December  31, 1997
  10,803,369  $10,803   60,072  $(240,515) $25,398,897  $(241,469) $69,506  $2,693,375 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  54,589   55         10,502          
Purchase of treasury stock        212,800   (543,618)            
Sale of treasury stock        (49,714)  97,144             
Amortization of deferred compensation                 174,143       
Comprehensive income (loss):                                
 Unrealized loss on short-term investments                    (22,337)   
 Foreign currency translation adjustment                    156,902    
 Net loss                       (9,153,598)
 Comprehensive loss                                
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December  31, 1998
  10,857,958   10,858   223,158   (686,989)  25,409,399   (67,326)  204,071   (6,460,223)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  61,093   61         16,410          
Sale of treasury stock        (48,276)  77,006             
Amortization of deferred compensation                 56,532       
Comprehensive income (loss):                                
 Unrealized loss on short-term investments                    (271,098)   
 Foreign currency translation adjustment                    (119,473)   
 Net income                       2,110,875 
 Comprehensive income                                
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December  31, 1999
  10,919,051   10,919   174,882   (609,983)  25,425,809   (10,794)  (186,500)  (4,349,348)
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  4,050   4         10,497          
Sale of treasury stock        (86,920)  106,710             
Amortization of deferred compensation                 10,794       
Comprehensive income (loss):                                
 Unrealized gain on short-term investments                    212,916    
 Foreign currency translation adjustment                    (17,954)   
 Net income                       530,939 
 Comprehensive income                                
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December  31, 2000
  10,923,101  $10,923   87,962  $(503,273) $25,436,306  $  $8,462  $(3,818,409)
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

[Additional columns below]

[Continued from above table, first column(s) repeated]
      
Total
Stockholders’
Equity

Balance at December  31, 1997
 $27,690,597 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  10,557 
Purchase of treasury stock  (543,618)
Sale of treasury stock  97,144 
Amortization of deferred compensation  174,143 
Comprehensive income (loss):    
 Unrealized loss on short-term investments  (22,337)
 Foreign currency translation adjustment  156,902 
 Net loss  (9,153,598)
   
 
 Comprehensive loss  (9,019,033)
   
 
Balance at December  31, 1998
  18,409,790 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  16,471 
Sale of treasury stock  77,006 
Amortization of deferred compensation  56,532 
Comprehensive income (loss):    
 Unrealized loss on short-term investments  (271,098)
 Foreign currency translation adjustment  (119,473)
 Net income  2,110,875 
   
 
 Comprehensive income  1,720,304 
   
 
Balance at December  31, 1999
  20,280,103 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  10,501 
Sale of treasury stock  106,710 
Amortization of deferred compensation  10,794 
Comprehensive income (loss):    
 Unrealized gain on short-term investments  212,916 
 Foreign currency translation adjustment  (17,954)
 Net income  530,939 
   
 
 Comprehensive income  725,901 
   
 
Balance at December  31, 2000
 $21,134,009 
   
 

                                      
Accumulated
Common StockTreasury StockAdditionalComprehensiveTotal


Paid-inDeferredIncomeRetainedStockholders’
SharesAmountSharesAmountCapitalCompensation(Loss)(Deficit)Equity









Balance at December 31, 1998  10,857,958  $10,858   223,158  $(686,989) $25,409,399  $(67,326) $204,071  $(6,460,223) $18,409,790 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  61,093   61         16,410            16,471 
Sale of treasury stock        (48,276)  77,006               77,006 
Amortization of deferred compensation                 56,532         56,532 
Comprehensive income (loss):                                    
 Net change in unrealized loss on short-term investments                    (271,098)     (271,098)
 Foreign currency translation adjustment                    (119,473)     (119,473)
 Net loss                       2,110,875   2,110,875 
                                   
 
 Comprehensive income                                  1,720,304 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 1999  10,919,051   10,919   174,882   (609,983)  25,425,809   (10,794)  (186,500)  (4,349,348)  20,280,103 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  4,050   4         10,497            10,501 
Sale of treasury stock        (86,920)  106,710               106,710 
Amortization of deferred compensation                 10,794         10,794 
Comprehensive income (loss):                                    
 Net change in unrealized gain on short-term investments                    212,916      212,916 
 Foreign currency translation adjustment                    (17,954)     (17,954)
 Net income                       530,939   530,939 
                                   
 
 Comprehensive income                                  725,901 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2000  10,923,101   10,923   87,962   (503,273)  25,436,306      8,462   (3,818,409)  21,134,009 
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of options  44,406   44         11,939            11,983 
Warrants issued to non-employee              30,600            30,600 
Purchase of treasury stock        7,144,854   (14,294,972)              (14,294,972)
Sale of treasury stock        (90,204)  93,313               93,313 
Retirement of treasury stock  (7,142,611)  (7,142)  (7,142,612)  14,704,932   (14,697,790)            
Comprehensive income (loss):                                    
 Net change in unrealized gain on short-term investments                    82,686      82,686 
 Foreign currency translation adjustment                    4,366      4,366 
 Net income                       638,460   638,460 
                                   
 
 Comprehensive income                                  725,512 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2001  3,824,896  $3,825     $  $10,781,055  $  $95,514  $(3,179,949) $7,700,445 
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
 

See accompanying notes.

F-5


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

                            
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,


199819992000199920002001






Operating activities
Operating activities
 
Operating activities
 
Net income (loss) $(9,153,598) $2,110,875 $530,939 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) operating activities: 
Net incomeNet income $2,110,875 $530,939 $638,460 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: 
Depreciation and amortization 614,099 529,188 652,837 Depreciation and amortization 529,188 652,837 700,666 
Amortization of goodwill 70,125 70,124 70,124 Amortization of goodwill 70,124 70,124 70,124 
Loss on disposal of fixed assets 610,159 25,881 36,534 Loss on disposal of fixed assets 25,881 36,534 176,378 
Amortization of computer software costs 377,384 694,362 1,158,170 Amortization of computer software costs 694,362 1,158,170 937,774 
Amortization of deferred compensation 174,143 56,532 10,794 Amortization of deferred compensation 56,532 10,794  
Current income tax expense payable to affiliates (387,443)   Provision for doubtful accounts 44,510 245,170 (584,312)
Deferred income taxes (85,000)   Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquired business: 
Provision for doubtful accounts 507,283 44,510 245,170  Accounts receivable (1,885,316) (264,438) 1,640,037 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquired business:  Due from affiliates (283,754) 280,251 (139,683)
 Accounts receivable 398,369 (1,885,316) (264,438) Unbilled revenue 83,538 38,635 (130,736)
 Due from affiliates 679,251 (283,754) 280,251  Income tax receivable 331,337   
 Unbilled revenue (102,669) 83,538 38,635  Other assets (395,671) 17,411 328,341 
 Income tax receivable (331,337) 331,337   Accounts payable (456,309) (272,146) (140,974)
 Other assets (239,162) (395,671) 17,411  Accrued compensation 7,935 (923,771) (71,255)
 Accounts payable 391,675 (456,309) (272,146) Accrued liabilities (1,075,860) (163,976) 134,622 
 Accrued compensation 1,080,978 7,935 (923,771) Deferred revenue (844,986) 1,589,169 (556,618)
 Accrued liabilities 1,374,169 (1,075,860) (163,976)  
 
 
 
 Deferred revenue 3,990,648 (844,986) 1,589,169 
 
 
 
 
 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (30,926) (987,614) 3,005,703 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activitiesNet cash provided by (used in) operating activities (987,614) 3,005,703 3,002,824 
Investing activities
Investing activities
 
Investing activities
 
Purchases of short-term investmentsPurchases of short-term investments (16,196,630) (16,027,127) (7,495,217)Purchases of short-term investments (16,298,225) (7,280,780) (4,705,851)
Sales of short-term investmentsSales of short-term investments 18,194,575 12,784,046 340,284 Sales of short-term investments 12,784,046 340,284 11,014,139 
Maturities of short-term investmentsMaturities of short-term investments 3,010,000 2,935,000 6,900,000 Maturities of short-term investments 2,935,000 6,900,000 1,850,000 
Purchases of property and equipment, netPurchases of property and equipment, net (752,194) (709,568) (905,449)Purchases of property and equipment, net (709,568) (905,449) (132,963)
Proceeds from disposal of assetsProceeds from disposal of assets  29,640 73,044 Proceeds from disposal of assets 29,640 73,044 7,747 
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities (22,337) (271,098) 214,437 
Additions to computer software costsAdditions to computer software costs (643,655) (642,820) (1,190,758)Additions to computer software costs (642,820) (1,190,758) (716,756)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 3,589,759 (1,901,927) (2,063,659)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activitiesNet cash provided by (used in) investing activities (1,901,927) (2,063,659) 7,316,316 
Financing activities
Financing activities
 
Financing activities
 
Principal payments under capital lease obligationsPrincipal payments under capital lease obligations (63,158) (41,566) (12,620)Principal payments under capital lease obligations (41,566) (12,620)  
Purchase of treasury stockPurchase of treasury stock (543,618)   Purchase of treasury stock   (12,015,772)
Sale of treasury stockSale of treasury stock 97,144 77,006 106,710 Sale of treasury stock 77,006 106,710 93,313 
Proceeds from issuance of common stockProceeds from issuance of common stock 10,557 16,471 10,501 Proceeds from issuance of common stock 16,471 10,501 42,583 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (499,075) 51,911 104,591 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activitiesNet cash provided by (used in) financing activities 51,911 104,591 (11,879,876)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalentsIncrease (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 3,059,758 (2,837,630) 1,046,635 Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (2,837,630) 1,046,635 (1,560,736)
Foreign currency translation adjustment 108,361 (110,433) (24,472)
Effect of foreign currency on cashEffect of foreign currency on cash (110,433) (24,472) (20,555)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of yearCash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 3,526,301 6,694,420 3,746,357 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 6,694,420 3,746,357 4,768,520 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of yearCash and cash equivalents at end of year $6,694,420 $3,746,357 $4,768,520 Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $3,746,357 $4,768,520 $3,187,229 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
 
Interest paidInterest paid $11,135 $3,108 $1,040 Interest paid $3,108 $1,040 $ 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Notes issued for purchase of treasury stockNotes issued for purchase of treasury stock $ $ $2,279,200 
 
 
 
 

See accompanying notes.

F-6


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.     Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

     Document Sciences Corporation was incorporated on October 18, 1991 in Delaware as a subsidiary of Xerox Corporation (Xerox). We develop, market and support a family of document automation software products and services used in high volume electronic publishing applications.Autograph, our document automation software architecture, enables personalized publishing solutions for many industries including insurance, managed healthcare, financial services, commercial print services, government, telecommunications and manufacturing.

     We currently derive substantially all of our license revenues from licenses of CompuSet,Autograph’sflagship product, and related products and from fees for services related to the CompuSet software. Our financial performance will continue to depend, in significant part, on the successful development, introduction and customer acceptance of new and enhanced versions of the CompuSet software and related products. There can be no assurance that we will continue to be successful in developing and marketing CompuSet products and related services.

     We currently have a variety of contractual and informal relationships with Xerox and affiliates of Xerox, including a cooperative marketing agreement, a transfer and license agreement and various distribution agreements. There can be no assurance that Xerox or its affiliates will continue these relationships. Our failure to maintain these relationships with Xerox and its affiliates could have a material adverse effect on our financial statements.

Basis of Presentation

     In 1994, we established a wholly owned subsidiary, Document Sciences Europe, in France, in order to market and support our products to the European community. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of all our operations. Significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Foreign Operations

     The functional currency of our French subsidiary isin 2001 was the French Franc. Beginning January 1, 2002, the functional currency became the Euro. The balance sheet accounts of our subsidiary are translated into U.S. Dollars at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Revenues and expenses are translated into U.S. Dollars at the average rates of exchange during the period. Foreign currency translation gains are recorded as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency transaction gains and losses are included in generalselling and administrativemarketing expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and were not materialsignificant during the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000.2001.

Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments

     Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid investments whichthat include debt securities with remaining maturities when acquired of three months or less and are stated at market.fair market value. We evaluate

F-7


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

the financial strength of institutions at which significant investments are made and believe the related credit risk is limited to an acceptable level.

F-7


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

      We have adoptedIn accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115,Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities, and classifywe have classified our investments as available-for-sale in accordance with that standard.available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, are reported in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary, if any, on available-for-sale securities will be included in investment income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Concentration of Credit Risk

     We sell our products primarily to large, multinational customers in the United States, Europe, Canada, Australia and Brazil. We derived 31%25%, 25%28% and 28%21% of our total revenues from customers outside the United States for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. A significant concentration of our customers is in the insurance, finance and commercial print service industries. Xerox was the only customer that accounted for more than 10% of our revenue in any one year. They accounted for 27%21%, 21%23% and 23%19% for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

     Credit is extended based on an evaluation of the customer’s financial condition and a cash deposit is generally not required. We estimate our potential losses on trade receivables on an ongoing basis and provide for anticipated losses in the period in which the revenues are recognized.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

     In accordance with SFAS No. 121,Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of,Of, we record impairment losses on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the asset’s carrying amount. SFAS No. 121 also addresses the accounting for long-lived assets that are expected to be disposed of. To date, no such impairments have been identified.

Computer Software Costs

     In accordance with SFAS No. 86,Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed, costs incurred in the research and development of new software products and significant enhancements to existing software products are expensed as incurred until the technological feasibility of the product has been established. After technological feasibility has been established, direct production costs, including programming and testing, are capitalized until general release of the product.

     Capitalized costs of software to be sold, licensed or otherwise marketed are amortized using the greater of the amount computed using the ratio of current period product revenues to estimated total product revenues or the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic lives of the products. It is possible that estimated total product revenues, the estimated economic life of the product, or both, will be reduced in the future. As a result, the carrying amount of capitalized software costs may be reduced in the future, which could result in charges tocause our operating results in future periods.

periods to be adversely affected.

Depreciation and Amortization

     Depreciation is provided on a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets (generally three to seven years). Amortization of leasehold improvements is provided over the lesser of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. AmortizationPrior to 2002, amortization of goodwill iswas provided over an estimated life of 15 years. Beginning in 2002, we will adopt SFAS No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which states that we annually review goodwill for impairment.

F-8


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Revenue Recognition

     We recognize revenue in accordance with AICPA Statement of Position (SOP)SOP 97-2,Software Revenue Recognitionand Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB)SAB No. 101,Revenue Recognition in Financial StatementsStatements.. Initial license fees are recognized when a contract exists, the fee is fixed orand determinable, software delivery has occurred and collection of the receivable is deemed probable. The portionfair value of the initial license fee representing the software support for the first year is deferred and recognized ratably over the contract period.period of support. Annual renewal license and support fees are recognized ratably over the contract period. Revenues from commissions paid by Xerox in connection with the sale of Xerox printer products are recognized upon installation of the printer products. Revenues generated from consulting services are recognized as the related services are performed. However, when such consulting services are deemed to be essential to the functionality of the delivered software product, revenue from the entire arrangement is recognized on a percentage of completion method or not until the contract is completed in accordance with SOP 81-1,Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts, and Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB)ARB No. 45,Long-Term Construction-Type ContractsContracts..

Computation of Net Income Per Share

     In accordance with SFAS No. 128,Earnings per Share, “Basic EPS” includes no dilution and is based on weighted-average common shares outstanding for the period. SFAS No. 128 also requires companies with complex capital structures to present “Diluted EPS” that reflects the potential dilution of securities such as employee stock options.

     In 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, the difference between weighted-average shares used in determining Basic EPS versus Diluted EPS related to dilutive common stock options totaled 123,060, 382,305 and 382,305282,856 shares, respectively. Common stock options to purchase 867,234, 1,523,619448,908, 227,722 and 1,252,609282,274 shares were excluded from the calculation of weighted-average shares used in determining Diluted EPS for 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively, as their effect would have been antidilutive.

Stock Options

     As permitted by SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, we have elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB)APB No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,and related interpretations in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB Opinion No. 25, among other things, when the exercise price of our employee stock options is not less than the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.

Income Taxes

     We follow the liability method of accounting for income taxes, as set forth in SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes.Through September 19, 1996, we were included in the consolidated tax returns of Xerox, and our share of Xerox consolidated income tax liability was determined on a separate company basis computed under Internal Revenue Code guidelines. Subsequent to our initial public offering on September 19, 1996, we have filed separate federal and state tax returns and are only included in certain consolidated state tax returns with Xerox.

Comprehensive Income

     In 1998, we adopted SFAS No. 130,Reporting Comprehensive Income.SFAS No. 130 requires that all components of comprehensive income, including net income, be reported in the financial statements in the period they are recognized. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. Net income and other comprehensive income, including foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on invest-

F-9


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

ments,investments, shall be reported, net of their related tax effect, to arrive at comprehensive income. We have disclosed comprehensive income in our financial statements accordingly.

F-9


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Segment Information

     In 1998, we adopted SFAS No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.SFAS No. 131 amends the requirements for public enterprises to report financial and descriptive information about their reportable operating segments. Operating segments, as defined in SFAS No. 131, are components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by a company in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. This financial information is required to be reported on the basis that is used internally for evaluating the segment performance. WeThe chief operating decision maker does not evaluate our operationsoperation based on geographic location, and, therefore, we operate in two segments, United States and Europe operations.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

      In June 1999,one business segment, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued Statement No. 137,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — Deferral of Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133,SFAS No. 137. The Statement defers for one yearsoftware business. Geographic information, however, has been disclosed in accordance with the effective dateprovisions of SFAS No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.SFAS No. 137 now will apply to all fiscal quarters of all fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. 131.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June 1998,July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 133, which141,Business Combinationsand No. 142,Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.SFAS No. 141 requires usall business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 to recognize all derivatives onbe accounted for by the balance sheet at fair value. Derivativespurchase method. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually (or more frequently if impairment indicators arise) for impairment. Separate intangible assets that are not hedges mustdeemed to have an indefinite life will continue to be adjustedamortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to fair value through income. Ifgoodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. With respect to goodwill and intangible assets acquired prior to July 1, 2001, we are required to adopt SFAS No. 142 effective January 1, 2002. Effective January 1, 2002, we will discontinue amortization of goodwill, which will reduce annual operating expenses by approximately $70,000.

In August 2001, the derivative isFASB issued SFAS No. 144,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment of long-lived assets and supercedes SFAS No. 121,Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of, and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30,Reporting the Results of Operations for a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of derivatives will either be offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. The ineffective portionDisposal of a derivative’s change in fair value will be immediately recognized in earnings. AsSegment of December 31, 2000, the Company dida Business.We are required to adopt SFAS No. 144 effective January 1, 2002. We do not hold any derivative instruments, or conduct any hedging activities. Therefore, there is no anticipated impact to the consolidated financial statements forexpect the adoption of SFAS No. 133 and 137 at January 1, 2001.

      In March 2000, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. (FIN) 44,Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation — an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 25. FIN 44 clarifies the definition of an employee for purposes of applying APB No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. APB No. 25 states the criteria for determining whether a plan qualifies as a noncompensatory plan, the accounting consequence of various modifications to the terms of a previously fixed stock option or award and the accounting for an exchange of stock compensation awards in a business combination. FIN 44 became effective on July 1, 2000, but certain conclusions in this Interpretation cover specific events that occur after either December 15, 1998 or January 12, 2000. FIN 44 did not144 will have a material effectsignificant impact on our operating results and financial position or results of operations.condition.

Reclassifications

      Certain reclassifications, none of which affect net income (loss), have been made to prior years’ amounts in order to conform to the current year’s presentation.

F-10


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

2.     Financial Statement Information

Property and EquipmentInvestments

     Property and equipment are stated at cost and consist of the following at December 31:

         
19992000


Computer equipment $1,908,711  $2,177,786 
Office equipment  243,100   328,249 
Office furniture and fixtures  323,281   426,830 
Leasehold improvements  681,004   567,649 
   
   
 
   3,156,096   3,500,514 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  (1,368,851)  (1,569,815)
   
   
 
  $1,787,245  $1,930,699 
   
   
 

      The cost of equipment acquired under capital leases totaled $217,071 and $203,853 at December 31, 1999 and 2000, respectively, with accumulated depreciation of $168,614 and $188,879 at December 31, 1999 and 2000, respectively.

Investments

We have classified all of our investment securities as available-for-sale. The following table summarizes available-for-sale securities at December 31, 19992000 and 2000:2001:

                                
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedEstimated
CostGainsLossesFair Value




December 31, 1999
 
U.S. treasury securities $4,173,981 $ $102,917 $4,071,064 
U.S. government agency obligations 3,356,996  23,372 3,333,624 
U.S. corporate securities 6,221,613 482 98,121 6,123,974 
 
 
 
 
 UnrealizedUnrealizedEstimated
 $13,752,590 $482 $224,410 $13,528,662 CostGainsLossesFair Value
 
 
 
 
 



December 31, 2000
  
U.S. treasury securities $3,827,316 $3,403 $11,395 $3,819,324  $3,827,316 $3,403 $11,395 $3,819,324 
U.S. government agency obligations 4,123,255 6,406 2,890 4,126,771  4,123,255 6,406 2,890 4,126,771 
U.S. corporate securities 5,844,037 31,933 38,470 5,837,500  5,844,037 31,933 38,470 5,837,500 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 $13,794,608 $41,742 $52,755 $13,783,595  $13,794,608 $41,742 $52,755 $13,783,595 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
December 31, 2001
 
U.S. government agency obligations $5,664,527 $73,139 $1,466 $5,736,200 
 
 
 
 
 

F-10


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2000,2001, by contractual maturity, are shown below:

                
EstimatedEstimated
CostFair ValueCostFair Value




Due in one year or less $7,038,507 $7,142,062  $2,254,900 $2,271,419 
Due after one year through ten years 6,756,101 6,641,533  3,409,627 3,464,781 
 
 
  
 
 
 $13,794,608 $13,783,595  $5,664,527 $5,736,200 
 
 
  
 
 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and consist of the following at December 31:

         
20002001


Computer equipment $2,177,786  $1,358,695 
Office equipment  328,249   311,889 
Office furniture and fixtures  426,830   448,175 
Leasehold improvements  567,649   523,423 
   
   
 
   3,500,514   2,642,182 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  (1,569,815)  (1,463,582)
   
   
 
  $1,930,699  $1,178,600 
   
   
 

     The cost of equipment acquired under capital leases totaled $203,853 and $176,715 at December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively, with accumulated depreciation of $188,879 and $173,773 at December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively.

3.     Segment Information

The tables below summarize our operating results by our major geographic locations in the United States and Europe:

                 
United StatesEuropeEliminationsTotals




Year ended December 31, 1999
                
Sales to unaffiliated customers $17,641,284  $1,490,348  $  $19,131,632 
Sales to affiliates  2,972,985   2,200,623      5,173,608 
   
   
   
   
 
Revenues $20,614,269  $3,690,971  $  $24,305,240 
   
   
   
   
 
Operating income (loss) $1,549,879  $(183,570) $  $1,366,309 
   
   
   
   
 
Identifiable assets $30,106,425  $332,919  $(16,666) $30,422,678 
   
   
   
   
 

F-11


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

  3. Segment Information

      The tables below summarize our operations in the United States and by those of our subsidiary, Document Sciences Europe:

                                
UnitedUnited StatesEuropeEliminationsTotals
StatesEuropeEliminationsTotals




Year ended December 31, 1998
 
Sales to unaffiliated customers $13,581,446 $2,081,749 $ $15,663,195 
Sales to affiliates 2,019,548 2,424,607  4,444,155 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues $15,600,994 $4,506,356 $ $20,107,350 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss) $(10,404,611) $44,090 $ $(10,360,521)
 
 
 
 
 
Identifiable assets $29,811,491 $1,193,834 $(16,666) $30,988,659 
 
 
 
 
 
Year ended December 31, 1999
 
Sales to unaffiliated customers $17,904,917 $2,200,623 $ $20,105,540 
Sales to affiliates 2,709,352 1,490,348  4,199,700 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues $20,614,269 $3,690,971 $ $24,305,240 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss) $1,549,879 $(183,570) $ $1,366,309 
 
 
 
 
 
Identifiable assets $30,106,425 $332,919 $(16,666) $30,422,678 
 
 
 
 
 



Year ended December 31, 2000
  
Sales to unaffiliated customers $16,302,949 $2,327,654 $ $18,630,603  $15,859,272 $1,532,215 $ $17,391,487 
Sales to affiliates 2,416,109 1,532,215  3,948,324  2,859,786 2,327,654  5,187,440 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Revenues $18,719,058 $3,859,869 $ $22,578,927  $18,719,058 $3,859,869 $ $22,578,927 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Operating income (loss) $(551,081) $135,465 $ $(415,616) $(551,081) $135,465 $ $(415,616)
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
Identifiable assets $31,264,827 $248,233 $(16,666) $31,496,394  $31,264,827 $248,233 $(16,666) $31,496,394 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
                 
United StatesEuropeEliminationsTotals




Year ended December 31, 2001
                
Sales to unaffiliated customers $16,949,144  $1,045,804  $  $17,994,948 
Sales to affiliates  2,495,863   1,628,826      4,124,689 
   
   
   
   
 
Revenues $19,445,007  $2,674,630  $  $22,119,637 
   
   
   
   
 
Operating income (loss) $320,977  $38,369  $  $359,346 
   
   
   
   
 
Identifiable assets $19,530,350  $192,488  $(16,666) $19,706,172 
   
   
   
   
 

      In 1998, we adopted SFAS No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.     Sales attributable to the United States were made to customers located in North America, South America and Australia. Sales attributable to Europe are based on those sales generated by our French subsidiary. These sales were made to customers located in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

4.     Leases

     We lease our headquarters in Carlsbad, California under an operating lease expiring on February 28, 2005. Under the terms of the lease, effective March 1, 1999, monthly rental payments will be increased annually by 4%. The lease provides us with an option to extend the lease term for an additional five years at the base rent in effect for the last year of the initial lease term plus 4%. We sublease additional space in Carlsbad under an operating lease expiring October 14, 2001. Our offices in France and Milwaukee, Wisconsin are

F-12


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

under operating leases expiring on April 15, 2004 and March 31, 2003, respectively. Annual future minimum lease payments as of December 31, 20002001 are as follows:

        
Years ending December 31,
Operating
Years Ending December 31,Leases


2001 $466,370 
2002 428,221  $428,221 
2003 298,006  298,006 
2004 268,815  268,815 
2005 45,092  45,092 
Thereafter  
 
  
 
 1,506,504  $1,040,134 
 
  
 

     Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 20002001 was $576,417, $451,871, $492,886 and $492,886,$545,202, respectively.

5.     Stockholders’ Equity

Stock

     As of December 31, 2000,2001, authorized capital stock consisted of 30,000,000 shares of common stock and 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock.

F-12


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Stock Incentive Plans

     Our Stock Incentive Plansstock incentive plans provide for the issuance of incentive and nonstatutory options to purchase Common Sharescommon shares to eligible employees, officers, directors of and consultants to Document Sciences.consultants. Our 1993 Stock IncentiveOption Plan (the “1993 Plan”) provided for the issuance of up to 1,500,000 shares. In October 1995, the Board of Directors approved the 1995 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”), which provided for the issuance of an additional 779,250 shares which included 29,250 shares previously reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan. In 1998, 1999 and 2000, this plan was amended to provide for the issuance of an additional 750,000, 350,000 and 1,000,000 shares, respectively. The 1995 Plan replaced the 1993 Plan. All outstanding options under the 1993 Plan remain exercisable in accordance with their original terms. Terms of stock purchase or stock option agreements, including vesting requirements, are determined by the Board of Directors, subject to the provisions of the 1995 Plan. The maximum term of the options granted under the 1995 Plan is ten years. The exercise price of incentive stock options must equal at least the fair market value on the date of grant. The exercise price of nonstatutory stock options and stock issued under purchase rights must equal at least 85% of the fair market value on the date of grant or time of issuance.

     The following table summarizes stock option activity under the stock incentive plans:

                          
WeightedWeighted
NumberOption PriceAverage Price
of SharesPer SharePer Share



Balance at December 31, 1998 867,234 $ .03 – $10.00 $2.64 
Granted 1,297,850 $1.50 – $ 2.00 $1.90 Average
Exercised (61,093) $ .03 – $  .67 $  .27 NumberOption PriceExercise Price
Canceled (457,312) $ .03 – $10.00 $2.70 of SharesPer SharePer Share
 
 


Balance at December 31, 1999Balance at December 31, 1999 1,646,679 $ .03 – $10.00 $2.10 Balance at December 31, 1999 1,646,679 $.03-$10.00 $2.10 
Granted 161,500 $1.13 – $ 5.00 $2.65 Granted 161,500 $1.13-$ 5.00 $2.65 
Exercised (4,050) $  .67 $.67 Exercised (4,050) $  .67 $  .67 
Canceled (169,215) $ .67 – $10.00 $2.05 Canceled (169,215) $.67-$10.00 $2.05 
 
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2000Balance at December 31, 2000 1,634,914 $ .03 – $10.00 $2.17 Balance at December 31, 2000 1,634,914 $.03-$10.00 $2.17 
 
 Granted 520,150 $.91-$ 2.64 $1.50 
Exercised (44,406) $.03-$ 1.97 $.27 
Canceled (395,943) $1.13-$10.00 $2.27 
 
 
Balance at December 31, 2001Balance at December 31, 2001 1,714,715 $.17-$10.00 $1.98 
 
 

F-13


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

As of December 31, 2000, 845,782 of the options were vested and exercisable and 1,150,1712001, 1,025,964 shares were available for future grant. Following is a breakdown of the options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 2000:2001:

                       
WeightedWeighted
AverageAverage
WeightedExerciseExercise
Range ofAveragePrice ofPrice of
ExerciseOptionsRemainingOptionsOptionsOptions
PricesOutstandingLife in yearsOutstandingExercisableExercisable






 $  .03 – $   .67   90,299   3.22  $0.22   90,299  $0.22 
 $1.13 – $ 1.75   262,450   8.64  $1.53   227,731  $1.53 
 $1.97   818,032   8.70  $1.97   257,947  $1.97 
 $2.00 – $10.00   464,133   7.98  $3.23   269,805  $3.56 
     
           
     
     1,634,914   8.18  $2.16   845,782  $2.17 
     
           
     
                       
WeightedWeighted AverageWeighted Average
AverageExercise PriceExercise Price
OptionsRemainingof OptionsOptionsof Options
Range of Exercise PricesOutstandingLife in YearsOutstandingExercisableExercisable






 $ .17-$1.75   796,383   8.37  $1.39   286,078  $1.28 
 $1.97   536,597   7.70  $1.97   304,092  $1.97 
 $2.00-$10.00   381,735   7.09  $3.18   296,969  $3.33 
     
           
     
 Total or Average   1,714,715   7.87  $1.98   887,139  $2.20 
     
           
     

      In 1996, we recorded $440,000 of deferred compensation for options granted to employees prior to our initial public offering, which closed September 19, 1996. The amount recorded represents the difference between the option grant price and the deemed fair market value of the related shares. We are amortizing such amount ratably over the 48-month vesting period of the options.

      On March 17, 1998, 68,403 options with exercise prices between $5.00 and $15.00 per share were repriced to $4.75 per share, the fair market value of the stock at such date.

     Adjusted pro forma information regarding net income (loss)our operating results is required by SFAS No. 123, and has been determined as if we had accounted for our employee stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. For options granted in the period prior to September 19, 1996, the fair value for options was estimated at the date of grant using the “minimum value” method for option pricing with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rates of 5.5%-6%, dividend yields of 0% and a weighted-average expected life of the option of four to seven years. For options granted from September 19, 1996 to December 31, 2000, theThe fair value of options was estimated at the date of grant using the “Black-Scholes” method for option pricing with the following weighted-average assumptions: risk-free interest rates of 5.5%-6%, dividend yields of 0%, expected volatility of .69 to 1.43 and a weighted-average expected life of the option of seven years.

F-13


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

For purposes of adjusted pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the option’s vesting period. The effect of applying SFAS No. 123 for purposes of providing pro forma disclosures is not likely to be representative of the effects on reported net income (loss)our operating results for future years because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect future value estimates. Our pro forma information is as follows:

                        
Years ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,


199819992000199920002001






Adjusted pro forma basic net income (loss) $(9,704,706) $1,466,003 $(292,321) $1,466,003 $(292,321) $541,356 
Adjusted pro forma basic net income (loss) per share $(.91) $.14 $(.03) $0.14 $(0.03) $0.10 
Adjusted pro forma diluted net income (loss) per share $(.91) $.14 $(.03) $0.14 $(0.03) $0.09 

     Our 1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan provides for the issuance of shares of our common stock, up to a total of 350,000 shares, to eligible employees. The price of the common shares purchased under the Plan is equal to 85% of the fair market value of the common shares on the first or last day of the offering period, whichever is lower. Employees who choose to participate in the plan can withhold between one and ten percent of their wages. However, an employee cannot purchase more than 5,000 shares in any one offering period. As of December 31, 2001, 59,791 shares were available for issuance.

F-14


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

6.     Income Taxes

     For financial reporting purposes, income (loss) before income taxes includes the following components:

            
Years Ended December 31,
            
199819992000199920002001






United States $(9,660,080) $2,294,445 $409,500  $2,294,445 $409,500 $601,898 
Foreign 200,314 (183,570) 135,465  (183,570) 135,465 38,369 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 $(9,459,766) $2,110,875 $544,965  $2,110,875 $544,965 $640,267 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

     The provision for income taxes (benefit) is as follows:

              
Years Ended December 31,

199819992000



Current:            
 Federal $(331,337) $  $14,026 
 State         
 Foreign  110,169       
   
   
   
 
   (221,168)     14,026 
Deferred (credit):            
 Federal  (104,000)      
 State  19,000       
 Foreign         
   
   
   
 
   (85,000)      
   
   
   
 
  $(306,168) $  $14,026 
   
   
   
 
              
Years Ended December 31,

199920002001



Current:            
 Federal $  $14,026  $1,807 
   
   
   
 

F-14


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Deferred income taxes reflect the net effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

             
              
December 31,
December 31,

199819992000199920002001






Deferred tax liabilities:Deferred tax liabilities: Deferred tax liabilities: 
Computer software costs $(509,100) $(490,200) $(502,200)Computer software costs expensed for tax $(490,200) $(502,200) $(421,200)
Fixed assets (127,900) (149,600) (138,800)Excess tax depreciation (149,600) (138,800) (80,800)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 Total deferred tax liabilities (637,000) (639,800) (641,000)
Total deferred tax liabilitiesTotal deferred tax liabilities (639,800) (641,000) (502,000)
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Deferred tax assets:Deferred tax assets: Deferred tax assets: 
Operating loss carryforwards 2,496,000 2,362,700 1,921,300 Operating loss carryforwards 2,362,700 1,921,300 1,853,600 
Accrued vacation 132,000 157,600 201,100 Accrued liabilities 413,000 552,300 355,200 
Provision for doubtful accounts 262,400 255,400 351,200 Tax credits 231,900 431,600 490,800 
Tax credits 205,900 231,900 431,600   
 
 
 
Restructuring charges 728,800   
 
 
 
 
 Total deferred tax assets 3,825,100 3,007,600 2,905,200 
Total deferred tax assetsTotal deferred tax assets 3,007,600 2,905,200 2,699,600 
Valuation allowanceValuation allowance 3,188,100 2,367,800 2,264,200 Valuation allowance 2,367,800 2,264,200 2,197,600 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net deferred tax assetsNet deferred tax assets 637,000 639,800 641,000 Net deferred tax assets 639,800 641,000 502,000 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Net deferred tax asset (liability)Net deferred tax asset (liability) $0 $0 $0 Net deferred tax asset (liability) $0 $0 $0 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 

     A valuation allowance has been recognized to offset deferred tax assets as of December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 20002001 as realization of such assets is uncertain.

F-15


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

     At December 31, 2000,2001, we have federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $5.9$5.4 million whichthat will begin expiring in 2018 unless previously utilized. At December 31, 2000,2001, we have federal and state research and development tax credit carryforwards of approximately $372,100 which$419,000 and $71,800, respectively, that will begin expiring in 2012 unless previously utilized.

     Pursuant to Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code, annual use of our net operating loss carryforwards may be limited in the event of a cumulative change in ownership of more than 50% within a three yearthree-year period.

     The differences between our income tax provision and the amounts computed by applying the statutory Federal income tax rate of 35% in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 20002001 to income before income taxes are as follows:

                        
December 31,December 31,


199819992000199920002001






Provision at statutory rate $(3,310,918) $738,806 $185,829  $738,806 $185,829 $224,093 
Benefit for graduated rates 94,596 (21,109) (5,309) (21,109) (5,309) (6,402)
Increase (decrease) in valuation allowance 3,188,100 (820,300) (103,600) (820,300) (103,600) (66,600)
Permanent differences and other (277,946) (102,603) (62,894) (102,603) (62,894) (149,284)
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Provision for income taxes $(306,168) $ $14,026  $ $14,026 $1,807 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 

7.     Transactions with Affiliates

      Until September 30, 1999, we had a strategic marketing alliance with Xerox under which both parties agreed to pay each other fees on referrals that led to the successful sale or licensing of each other’s products. Included in services and other revenues in the accompanying statements of operations are commissions earned from Xerox totaling $344,000, $287,000 and $0 in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. These commissions were 2%, 1% and 0% of total revenues in 1998, 1999 and 2000, respectively. No commissions we paid relating to referrals from Xerox in 1998, 1999 or 2000.

     We have distribution agreements with affiliates providing the non-exclusive right to sub-license our software in Canada, Australia and Brazil. The terms of the distributor agreements provide that the affiliates receive a discount from the list price of our licensed products and annual license fees. Revenues from the affiliates under these agreements, net of discounts, were $1.7$2.4 million, $2.4 million and $2.4$2.1 million in 1998, 1999,

F-15


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. Included in accounts receivable are $473,800, $900,500, $707,000 and $707,000$762,600 from these revenues at December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

     We have distribution agreements with affiliates providing the non-exclusive right to sub-license our software in Europe. Revenues under these agreements were $2.4 million, $2.2 million, and $2.3 million and $1.6 million in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. Related accounts receivable are $181,600, $663,300, $564,500 and $564,500$660,400 at December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

     We also license software to Xerox and affiliates of Xerox in the United States. These revenues were $962,600, $263,600, $443,700 and $443,700$430,300 in 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively. Related accounts receivable are $379,000, $221,400, $332,600 and $332,600$316,800 at December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, respectively.

F-16


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)     On February 16, 2001, we commenced a self tender offer for 6,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock. Xerox tendered all of its shares of Document Sciences common stock in the offer. The tender offer expired on March 23, 2001. In April 2001, we completed our tender offer and purchased 6,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock for $2.00 per share.

     8. Financial StatementsOn February 16, 2001, Xerox also granted us an option to purchase up to 2,000,000 additional shares of our stock it owned after completion of the tender offer at the tender offer price. On April 16, 2001, we executed two promissory notes payable to Xerox pursuant to our exercise of the option to purchase 1,139,600 shares of our common stock owned by Xerox at $2.00 per share. The principal amount of the first note is $2,000,000 and Supplementary Dataaccrues interest at 9%. This note is due on March 23, 2002. The principal amount of the second note is $279,200 and accrues interest at 9%. This note is due on March 23, 2003.

     Supplementary interim financial information is presented as follows (unaudited):

                 
Quarters ended

March 31June 30September 30December 31




2000
                
Revenues $5,669,926  $5,215,972  $4,981,821  $6,711,208 
Cost of revenues  1,309,457   1,200,741   1,284,185   1,661,802 
Net income (loss)  413,912   (382,875)  (208,652)  708,554 
Basic income (loss) per share  .04   (.04)  (.02)  .07 
Diluted income (loss) per share  .04   (.04)  (.02)  .07 
 
1999
                
Revenues $5,509,743  $5,996,779  $5,526,705  $7,272,013 
Cost of revenues  1,311,680   1,688,981   1,401,917   1,549,668 
Net income  225,805   259,077   461,159   1,164,834 
Basic income per share  .02   .02   .04   .11 
Diluted income per share  .02   .02   .04   .11 
As a result of our tender offer and our exercise of the option to purchase additional shares of Xerox, Xerox presently owns 19.9% of our outstanding shares.

8.     Sales Commitments

     9. Sales Commitments

      InSince 1999, we beganhave been licensing software for non-cancelable three-year terms. Where we provide extended payment terms to customers (allowing them to make payments on a quarterly or annual basis), we recognize license revenue when invoices come due, as SOP 97-2 precludes us from recognizing the portion of these licenses that is not currently due from the customer. Amounts not currently due from customers on these agreements are not reflected on our Balance Sheet and are identified below.

     We also began signing customers to non-cancelable three-year maintenance agreements, which we recognize ratably over the service period. As we invoice these agreements, the amounts are recorded initially to Deferred Revenue.as deferred revenue. Amounts to be invoiced are not reflected on our Balance Sheet and are identified below.

F-16


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

The following table summarizes these multi-year license and maintenance agreement activities showing ending balances not reflected on our Balance Sheet at December 31, 2000:2001:

            
Unrecognized Revenue
            Backlog Maintenance
Maintenance
LicensesAgreementsTotalsLicensesAgreementsTotals






Balances at December 31, 1998 $–0– $–0– $–0–  $-0- $-0- $-0- 
1999 additions 2,905,033 3,876,105 6,781,138  1,083,008 3,876,105 4,959,113 
1999 revenue recognized (2,064,003) (289,463) (2,353,466)
Invoiced and included in deferred revenue –0– (661,125) (661,125) (241,978) (950,588) (1,192,566)
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balances at December 31, 1999 841,030 2,925,517 3,766,547  841,030 2,925,517 3,766,547 
2000 additions 1,697,671 3,171,475 4,869,146  66,329 3,171,475 3,237,804 
2000 revenue recognized (1,978,795) (1,458,216) (3,437,011)
Invoiced and included in deferred revenue (71,842) (1,216,107) (1,287,949) (419,295) (2,674,323) (3,093,618)
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balances at December 31, 2000 $488,064 $3,422,669 $3,910,733  488,064 3,422,669 3,910,733 
2001 additions 23,334 2,830,831 2,854,165 
Invoiced and included in deferred revenue (484,257) (3,193,020) (3,677,277)
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
Balances at December 31, 2001 $27,141 $3,060,480 $3,087,621 
 
 
 
 

     All revenue from the unrecognized revenue backlog will have been recognized by the end of the fourththird quarter of 2003.2005.

F-17


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

10.9.     Employee Retirement Plan

401(k) Plan

     Document Sciences hasWe have an employee savings and retirement plan (the “401(k) Plan”) that is intended to be tax-qualified covering substantially all employees. Under the terms of the 401(k) Plan, employees may elect to contribute up to 15% of their compensation, or the statutory prescribed limit, if less, to the 401(k) Plan as a savings contribution. We may, in our discretion, match employee contributions, at such rate as we determine, up to a maximum of $3,000 or 10% of the employee’s compensation. The 401(k) Plan has a profit sharing element whereby we can contribute annually an amount determined by the Board of Directors. An employee’s interest in matching contributions and profit sharing contributions generally vest over four years from the date of employment. For the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000 and 2000,2001, we made discretionary contributions of $443,000, $346,200, $349,500 and $349,500,$202,900, respectively.

11. Restructuring ChargesF-17


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

10.     Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     In December 1998,Supplementary interim financial information is presented as follows (unaudited):

                 
Quarters Ended

March 31,June 30,September 30,December 31,




2000
                
Revenues $5,669,926  $5,215,972  $4,981,821  $6,711,208 
Cost of revenues  1,309,457   1,200,741   1,284,185   1,661,802 
Net income  413,912   (382,875)  (208,652)  708,554 
Basic income per share  .04   (.04)  (.02)  .07 
Diluted income per share  .04   (.04)  (.02)  .07 
2001
                
Revenues $5,257,439  $5,654,141  $5,032,409  $6,175,648 
Cost of revenues  1,683,494   1,394,637   1,337,854   1,570,307 
Net income (loss)  (351,582)  723,488   196,118   70,436 
Basic income (loss) per share  (.03)  .19   .05   .02 
Diluted income (loss) per share  (.03)  .19   .05   .02 

11.     Subsequent Events

     Effective January 16, 2002, we entered into a formal two-year development services and referral agreement with Objectiva Software Solutions, Inc. (Objectiva). Document Sciences has engaged Objectiva for development services since January 2001 and has committed to pay Objectiva $3.1 million over the two-year term of the agreement for development services to be provided by a dedicated team. The agreement is cancelable within 30 days due to material breach or with 90 days notice if all scheduled work has been completed. We would prorate the two-year fee in the case of early termination. Objectiva provided $750,000 worth of development services to us during the second half of 2001. Additionally, the parties have entered into a referral arrangement under which Objectiva would pay us 20% of net revenue associated with a transaction with a customer that was referred by us.

     We are also negotiating agreements whereby we would make an equity investment to acquire approximately 25% of Objectiva’s outstanding stock for approximately $550,000 in cash consideration and would enable Objectiva to resell our Boardsoftware in Asia. It is expected that these agreements would be finalized by the end of Directors approved a plan of restructuring and we recorded a charge of approximately $2.0 million. At December 31, 1998, our restructuring reserve totaled $1.5 million. This amount was paid in 1999 and there was no reserve remaining at December 31, 1999.

12. Subsequent Events

      In the first quarter of 2001, we eliminated 12 positions in the areas of sales, professional services, development and administration and recorded a charge of approximately $280,000.

      On February 16, 2001, we announced a tender offer to purchase up to 6,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock, par value $0.001 per share, at a purchase price of $2.00 per share. The offer will expire March 23, 2001, and be paid net to the seller in cash, without interest thereon, upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Offer to Purchase. Xerox has agreed to tender all of its shares in the offer. Additionally, we have an option to purchase from Xerox up to 2.0 million additional shares after the completion of the offer at $2.00 per share, with the purchase price represented by promissory notes. Both Xerox’s agreement to tender its shares in the offer and the exercise of the option are subject to the condition that in no event will we purchase shares that would cause Xerox’s ownership interest to be less than 19.9% of our outstanding shares.2002.

F-18


SCHEDULE II

DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

                                  
Balance atCharged toBalance atBalance atCharged toBalance at
BeginningCosts andEndBeginningCosts andEnd
of YearExpensesDeductionsof Yearof YearExpensesDeductionsof Year








Year Ended December 31, 1998
 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns $218,278 $1,199,425 $692,142 $725,561 
Year Ended December 31, 1999
Year Ended December 31, 1999
 Year Ended December 31, 1999 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns 725,561 219,482 179,170 765,873 Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns $725,561 $219,482 $179,170 $765,873 
Year Ended December 31, 2000
Year Ended December 31, 2000
 Year Ended December 31, 2000 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns 765,873 658,165 411,861 1,012,177 Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns 765,873 658,165 411,861 1,012,177 
Year Ended December 31, 2001Year Ended December 31, 2001 
Allowance for doubtful accounts and returns 1,012,177 113,000 697,494 427,683 

S-1


DOCUMENT SCIENCES CORPORATION

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

FOR YEAR ENDED DECEMBERFor Year Ended December 31, 20002001

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

     
Exhibit
NumberExhibit Description


 3.1(1)  Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant filed May 1, 1992.
 3.2(1)  Form of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.
 3.3(1)  Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant.
 3.4(1)  Form of Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant.
 4.1(1)  Specimen Stock Certificate.
 4.2(6)Rights Agreement Between the Registrant and U.S. Stock Transfer Corporation, as Rights Agent, dated May 11, 2001, which includes as Exhibit A thereto the form of Rights Certificate to be Distributed to Holders of Rights after the Distribution Date (as that term is defined in the Rights Agreement).
10.1(1, 3)2)  Form of Indemnity Agreement Between the Registrant and each of its Officers and Directors.
 10.2(1, 3)2)  1993 Stock Option Plan and Form of Agreement.
 10.3(5)10.3(4)  1995 Stock Incentive Plan and Form of Agreement, as amended.
 10.4(1, 3)2)  Stockholder Rights Agreement Dated September 1996 Between the Registrant and Xerox Corporation.
 10.5(1)  Tax Sharing Agreement Dated August 1996 Between the Registrant and Xerox Corporation.
 10.6(1)  Transfer and License Agreement Dated July 1, 1992, as Amended in September 1994, Between the Registrant and Xerox Corporation.
 10.7(1)  Strategic Marketing Alliance Agreement Dated September 1, 1993, Between the Registrant and Xerox Corporation.
 10.8(1)Value Added Remarketer Agreement Between Xerox Canada Limited and the Registrant.
10.9(1)Value Added Reseller Agreement Between N.V. Rank Xerox S.A. and the Registrant.
10.10(1)Form of Professional Services Agreement.
10.11(1)Form of Domestic Value Added Remarketer Agreement.
10.12(1)Form of International Value Added Reseller Agreement.
10.13(1)Form of Software License and Software Support Agreement.
10.14(2)Lease for Registrant’s Principal Facilities, as Amended and Assignment of Lease.
10.15(1, 3)Letter Agreement Between Tony Domit and the Registrant.
10.16(1, 3)Letter Agreement Between Thomas Anthony and the Registrant.
10.17(1, 3)Letter Agreement Between Judith A. O’Reilly and the Registrant.
10.18(1, 3)Letter Agreement Between Daniel Fregeau and the Registrant.
10.19(1, 3)Letter Agreement Between Alfred G. Altomare and the Registrant.
10.20(1)Value Added Reseller Agreement Between Geneva Digital Ltd. and the Registrant.
10.21(1)Value Added Remarketer Agreement Between Business and Business and the Registrant.
10.22(5)10.8(4)  1997 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.
 10.23(4)Tony N. Domit Agreement.
10.24(4)10.9(3)  Xerox Cooperative Marketing Agreement.
 10.25(4)10.10(3)  Xerox Canada Cooperative Marketing and Customer Support Agreement.
 10.26(5)10.11(4)  International Business Machines Marketing Agreement.
 10.27(5)10.12(4)  Lease for Company’s new Principal Facilities, as Amended, and Assignment of Lease.
 10.28(5)Thomas J. Anthony Agreement.
10.29(5)Robert J. Pryor Agreement.
10.30(5)John H. Wilson Consulting Agreement.
10.31(3, 6)10.13(2, 5)  John L. McGannon Employment Agreement.


 10.14(6)  Form of Software License and Software Support Agreement.
10.15(6) 
ExhibitForm of Professional Services Agreement.
Number10.16(6)Exhibit DescriptionForm of Value Added Reseller Agreement.

10.17(6)
Development Services and Referral Agreement Between Objectiva Software Solutions, Inc. and the Registrant.
 21.1(1)  List of Subsidiaries.
 23.1(6)  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors.
 24.1(6)  Power of Attorney (See page 22)21)


(1) Previously filed as exhibits to Registration Statement on Form S-1 Registration Number 333-06344.
 
(2) Indicates management compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
(3) Previously filed as exhibits to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.
(3) Indicates management compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.1997.
 
(4) Previously filed as exhibits to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997.1998.


(5) Previously filed as exhibits to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998.2000
 
(6) Filed herewith.