For the transition period from _______________ to _______________.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (22.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the issuer is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).
2
GROTE MOLEN,BLACKRIDGE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20152017
| | | PAGE |
| | PART I | |
| | | |
| Item 1. | Business | 24 |
| | |
| Item 1A. | Risk Factors | 1210 |
| | |
| Item 1B. | Unresolved Staff Comments | 1724 |
| | |
| Item 2. | Properties | 1724 |
| | |
| Item 3. | Legal Proceedings | 1724 |
| | |
| Item 4. | Mine Safety Disclosures | 1724 |
| | | |
| | PART II | |
| | | |
| Item 5. | Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities | 1825 |
| | |
| Item 6. | Selected Financial Data | 1928 |
| | |
| Item 7. | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations | 1928 |
| | |
| Item 7A. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk | 2534 |
| | |
| Item 8. | Financial Statements and Supplementary Data | 2634 |
| | |
| Item 9. | Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure | 2634 |
| | |
| Item 9A. | Controls and Procedures | 2635 |
| | |
| Item 9B. | Other Information | 2635 |
| | | |
| | PART III | |
| | | |
| Item 10. | Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance | 2736 |
| | |
| Item 11. | Executive Compensation | 2938 |
| | |
| Item 12. | Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters | 3040 |
| | |
| Item 13. | Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence | 3141 |
| | |
| Item 14. | Principal Accounting Fees and Services | 3242 |
| | |
| Item 15. | Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules | 3343 |
| | |
| Item 16. | Form 10-K Summary | 43 |
| | | |
| | SIGNATURES | 3544 |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements. These statements reflect the Company's views with respect to future events based upon information available to it at this time. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements. These uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A herein under the caption "Risk Factors." The words "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "plans," "projects," "targets" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, changes in assumptions, future events or otherwise.
Part I
Item 1. Business
Reorganization Agreement
On September 6, 2016, the Company and BlackRidge Technology Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("BlackRidge") entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the "Reorganization Agreement") originally dated as of September 6, 2016, and amended on February 22, 2017 to update the number of common shares, warrants, and options granted and outstanding as of the closing date.
On February 22, 2017, (the "Closing Date"), we completed the actions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreement and merged with and into BlackRidge with BlackRidge continuing as the surviving corporation.corporation ("Reorganization"). Upon completion of the Agreement, we issued 3,783,791 shares of our newly designated Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares of Common Stock to the stockholders of BlackRidge in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock and Common Stock of BlackRidge. Additionally, certain stockholders of the Company returned for cancellation a total of 16,284,330 shares of our Common Stock. Upon the completion of the Reorganization, BlackRidge became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the Company had a total of 3,783,791 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 21,790,683 shares of Common Stock outstanding, with the former BlackRidge stockholders owning 3,783,791 shares or 100% of Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares or approximately 58.9% of Common Stock. Upon completion of the Reorganization, we also had outstanding warrants entitling the holders to acquire a total of 18,541,579 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an average exercise price of $0.46 per share. The Reorganization resulted in a change of control of the Company. For accounting purposes, BlackRidge will be treated as the acquirer and the historical financial statements of BlackRidge will become the Company's historical financial statements. The acquisition is intended to constitute a tax-free reorganization pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
At the closing of the Reorganization, Robert Graham was appointed as President, and John Bluher was appointed Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary. In addition, Bruce Crane resigned from his position as a director and Robert Graham was appointed as a director of the Company to fill the vacancy created by such resignation. John Hofman, our remaining director, resigned from such position effective following our compliance with rule 14f-1 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and John Hayes and Robert Lentz were appointed as directors of the Company effective at such time as Mr. Hofman's resignation became effective.
On March 31, 2017, the Company completed the sale of substantially all assets, other than cash, used in or connection with the Company's home grain mill and kitchen mixer business to John Hofman and Bruce Crane, former officers and directors of the Company, in consideration for the assumption by such persons of substantially all the liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with such business. The assets divested consisted of the non-cybersecurity assets of the Company and included accounts receivable, inventory, deposits, property and equipment and intangible assets. The liabilities divested included the non-cybersecurity liabilities of the Company and included accounts payable and accrued expenses and long and short-term notes payable and accrued interest thereon.
Due to the change of control and the significant change in the Company's business resulting from the Reorganization,On July 2, 2017, the Company has determined to include in this report informationfiled Restated Articles with regard to BlackRidge and the businessSecretary of BlackRidge.
Information about Grote Molen, Inc.
General
Grote Molen, Inc. was incorporated under the lawsState of Nevada in March 2004. We also operate a wholly owned subsidiary by the name of BrownWick, LLC, which was organized as An Idaho Limited Liability Company in June 2005. Unless otherwise indicated, Grote Molen, Inc. and BrownWick, LLC are referred to, collectively herein as "we," "us," or the "Company."
We are engaged in the business of distributing our proprietary line of grain mills, known as the "WonderMill," and our kitchen mixer, known as the "WonderMix," for home use. Our WonderMills are available in electric and manual models and are used to grind wheat, rice and other small grains, but will also grind legumes and beans as large as garbanzos. Our electric WonderMill can mill about 12 cups of flour in 3 minutes and is adjustable to provide a texture ranging from a fine pastry flour to a coarse flour. Our WonderMix is an electric heavy-duty 3-speed mixer with a large 5.5 quart mixing bowl and a variety of available attachments. We sell our grain mills on a wholesale basis to retail dealers in all fifty states, in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and other foreign countries and to several online retailers. We sell our kitchen mixer on a wholesale basis to retail dealers in all fifty states and to certain foreign countries supplied by 110-volt electric current. Our mills and mixers are manufactured to our specifications under contract with manufacturers in India and Korea and we are dependent on such suppliers to provide us with our inventory of products. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in continuing to expand our business or that our sales will not decline in the future. We believe we will require substantial additional capital in order to expand our business and no assurance can be given that we will be successful in raising such additional capital.
Corporate History
We were organized under the laws of Nevada on March 15, 2004. Our wholly owned subsidiary, Brownwick, LLC, was organized under the laws of Idaho on June 5, 2005 and was acquired by us in August 2005 in exchange for shares of our common stock.
Our WonderMill Grinders
We are engaged in the business of contract manufacturing and distributing our proprietary line of electric and manual grain mills, known respectively as the "WonderMill" and the "Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill." The market for our WonderMill grinders consists primarily of home users and small natural foods restaurants desiring to grind their own grains due to the increased nutrients found in freshly ground whole wheat flour as compared to bleached white flour in which the bran and germ are removed prior to grinding. Our Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill is also purchased by persons for use as an emergency preparedness device because it can be operated without electricity to grind the whole wheat which is often stored in bulk for emergency situations. Our WonderMill and Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill both contain stainless steel blades and self cleaning milling chambers. Our WonderMills and Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mills are sold with limited lifetime warranties and warranty work is performed at our service center in Pocatello, Idaho or at our authorized service locations in Australia, Canada and the United Kingdom.
We believe our electric WonderMill is one of the quietest and fastest electric flourmills available. It may be used to grind wheat, rice and other small grains at temperatures that preserve nutrients, but will also grind legumes and beans as large as garbanzos. The WonderMill is adjustable to provide a texture ranging from fine pastry flour to coarse flour. Our electric WonderMill has a relatively large capacity and a 1250-watt motor that enables it to grind approximately 100 pounds of flour in one hour. The electric WonderMill has also been designed to be easy to use. The user simply fills the hopper, selects the grinding setting, turns it on and it begins to grind the grain. There are no small parts or gaskets to misplace, and cleaning the WonderMill is quick, easy and almost dust free. The list price for our electric WonderMill is $259.95.
We believe our Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill is a high quality and versatile hand mill. The Wonder Junior will grind wheat, rice and other small grains and will also grind legumes and beans as large as garbanzos. It can be adjusted to create very fine flour or coarse cracked grains for cereals. By swapping the stone heads for the stainless steel burr heads a user can also make peanut butter or other nut butters, can grind flax or any other oily or wet grain, and can grind herbs and spices, soybeans, and legumes. The whole Wonder Junior mill is powder-coated making it safe to wash for easy clean up. The hopper is large and holds over one quart. The octagon shape of the hopper makes it easy to fill. And because the Wonder Junior is one-piece construction the user does not need to worry about the hopper coming off during milling like some other hand grain mill models. The Wonder Junior also contains a heavy-duty patented double clamp that attaches to tables or counters up to two inches thick. The Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill uses large lifetime lubricated bearings and has a heavy base that can be bolted to any table or counter if desired. We believe the stone heads on the Wonder Junior are approximately one-third thicker than most of the competing manual grain mills that are designed to result in a smoother operation. In seconds, the high-quality stainless steel burr heads can be put on the Wonder Junior for milling wet or oily grains. The Wonder Junior is also easy to use. The user simply loads the easy-fill hopper, turns the handle, and it begins to grind flour or other grains. The list price for the Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill is $239.95.
Our WonderMix Kitchen Mixer
In early 2015 we introduced our newest product, a kitchen mixer known as the "WonderMix." The WonderMix is a heavy-duty, 3-speed mixer with a large 5.5 quart mixing bowl and available cookie whip, blender, slicer shredder, meat grinder, grain flaker and grain mill attachments. It includes a heavy duty Tru-Mix dough hook for mixing up to 6 loaves of bread. The WonderMix is powered by a large, 900-Watt motor and a high torque direct drive transmission and is backed by a 3-year warranty. It is BPA (bisphenol A) free, has a safety bowl locking mechanism, overload protection and a cord storage compartment. We believe the market for our WonderMix mixer will be substantially identical to the market for our WonderMill grinders and will consist primarily of home users and small natural foods restaurants. The WonderMix is a 110-volt appliance is not available in Europe or other countries supplied by 220-volt electricity. The list price for our WonderMix kitchen mixer is $299.95.
Manufacturing
Our mills and mixers are manufactured to our specifications under contract with a manufacturer in India for our Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill and in Korea for our electric WonderMill and our WonderMix and we are dependent on such suppliers to provide us with our inventory of products. Such manufacturers manufacture our products pursuant to purchase orders provided by us from time to time and then drop ship the products to our warehouse in Pocatello, Idaho and to our authorized resellers in Australia and the United Kingdom. We typically order a minimum of 1,000 products in each purchase order and we attempt to maintain an inventory of 1,000 products in our warehouse. We submit payment with our purchase orders and we submit our purchase orders based on sales projections that take into account the prior year's sales, sales in the current year, general economic conditions and other factors. The lead-time between submission of a purchase order and delivery of finished products is approximately 60 days for our electric WonderMill and WonderMix and approximately 90 days for our Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill. If we should underestimate sales and fail to timely submit purchase orders for new products, we could face delays in providing our products to dealers and their customers, which could have a negative effect on our reputation and result in a decline in our product sales. If we should overestimate sales, we will have invested our capital in products that remain in our warehouse or in the facilities of our authorized resellers, which will have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations. No assurances can be given that we will be able to accurately predict sales so as to maintain an optimal level of inventory in our system.
Our products are assembled using parts that we believe to be readily available from several sources and we believe the assembly process could be performed by a number of different manufacturers in India and Asia. However, we are dependent on our current manufacturers to provide timely deliveries of quality parts and products in order to meet customer demand for the timely delivery of our products. Furthermore, the ability of our manufacturers and their suppliers to timely deliver raw materials, parts and finished goods may be affected by events beyond their control, such as the inability of shippers to timely deliver merchandise due to work stoppages or slowdowns, or significant weather and health conditions (such as SARS) affecting manufacturers and/or shippers. Any adverse change in such things as our relationship with our third party manufacturers, the financial condition of such manufacturers, our ability to import our products from such manufacturers and their ability to manufacture and deliver our products on a timely basis could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. No assurance can be given that we could quickly or effectively replace any of our manufacturers if the need arose, and we cannot assure you that we could retrieve tooling and molds possessed by either of our manufacturers. Our dependence on these two manufacturers could also adversely affect our ability to react quickly and effectively to changes in the market for our products. The use of international manufacturers also subjects us to several significant risks that are beyond our control and the control of our manufacturers including, among other things, labor unrest, social, political and economic instability, restrictions on transfers of funds, domestic and international customs and tariffs, unexpected changes in regulatory environments and potentially adverse tax consequences.change the Company's name to BlackRidge Technology International, Inc.
Overview
Labor in India and Korea has historically been readily available at relatively low cost as compared to labor costs in North America. However, both countries have experienced rapid social, political and economic changes in recent years. We cannot assure you that labor will continue to be available to us in India or Korea at costs consistent with historical levels or that changes in labor or other laws will not be enacted which would have a material adverse effect on our operations in such countries. A substantial increase in labor costs in India or Korea could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Marketing and Sales
We sell our grain mills on a wholesale basis to retail dealers in all fifty states, in Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and other foreign countries and to several online retailers. We sell our kitchen mixer on a wholesale basis to retail dealers in all fifty states and to certain foreign countries supplied by 110-volt electric current. We maintain websites at www.thewondermill.com and www.wondermix.com that include information about our products, video demonstrations, dealer locator information, customer reviews, recipes for use with WonderMill and WonderMix products, information with regard to grain varieties and where to purchase them, customer support and repair forms and information on how to become a dealer. John Hofman and Bruce Crane, our former officers, directors and principal stockholders, each own retail stores that purchase our WonderMill grain mills from us on the same terms as other retailers. Sales to these related parties for our 2016 and 2015 fiscal years were $43,664 and $81,062 respectively, which amounted to approximately 4% and 5%, respectively, of our total sales each year. In addition, we have one other customer that accounted for approximately 10% and 7% of our total sales during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The loss of any of these major customers would be expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We incur advertising costs of a non-direct nature due in connection with advertising on our website and to our authorized dealers. During our fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, our advertising costs were $68,431 and $58,894, respectively.
Intellectual Property
We hold a patent on our Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill and we hold trademarks on the design of the electric WonderMill and the name "WonderMill." We also hold a copyright on the Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill. However, no assurance can be given that this patent and these trademarks will provide sufficient protection against potential competitors and we may be unable to successfully assert our intellectual property rights or these rights may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. Any such inability, particularly with respect to our product names, or a successful intellectual property challenge or infringement proceeding against us, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
During 2012, we purchased from a German manufacturer a license to the design and manufacture of its home kitchen mixer. We recently completed the molds and the design process to allow us to produce the WonderMix and introduced it to market in 2015. During the fourth quarter of 2014, we completed the contract manufacturing of our first shipment of the WonderMix. Because of its late completion in the prime sales season, we were unable to introduce the WonderMix in 2014. However, the response has been good by our dealers, and we experienced a successful introduction to market in 2015.
Although we have purchased the license and now manufacture under contract the WonderMix, no assurance can be given that we will be successful in the marketing of the grain mill or that the license will provide sufficient protection against potential competitors. Further, we may be unable to successfully assert our intellectual property rights or these rights may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged.
Facilities
BlackRidge's corporate headquarters are located at 10615 Professional Circle, Suite 201, Reno, NV 89521, phone 1-855-807-8776. This office consists of approximately 6,818 square feet of office and laboratory space and is leased from a third party pursuant to a 64 month lease expiring during April 2020, which provides for rent at the rate of $15,000.00 per month plus reimbursement of the landlord's costs for property taxes, insurance and common area maintenance, subject to increase on an annual basis.
BlackRidge also leases an engineering office at the Marist College Hancock Center, 3399 North Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601. This office consists of 200 square feet of office space and is leased from a third party pursuant to a twelve-month operating lease that renews annually. The rent for the facility is a flat monthly amount of $400 and the lease is renewable annually at the option of BlackRidge.
Grote Molen's offices are at 322 West Griffith Road, Pocatello, Idaho 83201, where our telephone number is (208) 234-9352. Our facilities consist of approximately 3,000 square feet of warehouse and office space located in a building owned by Big John's Store LLC, a company owned by John Hofman, our president, director and principal stockholder, which is shared with Big John's, a retail store owned by Mr. Hofman. Such space is provided to us under an Idaho Management Agreement with Big John's Store LLC pursuant to which we pay a flat rate of $12,500 per month for management services and the use of such space. Such agreement is on a month-to-month basis.
Competition
The home grain grinding and kitchen mixer industry is intensely competitive with respect to price, quality, features and durability and it is often difficult to entice customers to try a new product. There are also many well-established competitors with substantially greater financial and other resources than the Company. Such competitors include a large number of national and regional companies and most of our competitors have been in existence for a substantially longer period than have we and are better established. We believe our primary competitors are Blendtec, which produces the Blendtec Grain Mill, Nutrimill, which produces the Nutrimill Wheat Grinder, Country Living, which produces the Country Living Grain Mill, and Chris Enterprises, which produces the Family Grain Mill. Also, in the kitchen mixer market, we compete with Kitchenaid and Bosch. Almost all of such competitors are more established and have more experience and financial and human resources than do we. As such, there can be no assurance that we will be able to compete effectively in our chosen market. In addition, a change in the pricing, marketing or promotional strategies or product mix of one or more of these competitors could have a material adverse impact on our sales and earnings.
Government Regulation
Our operations are subject to numerous Federal, state and local government regulations, including those relating to the manufacture and distribution of electric and food preparation equipment and the importation of manufactured products from foreign countries. Our electric WonderMills meet the applicable requirements of Underwriters Laboratories (UL), Canadian Standards Association (CSA), and have received CE mark approval in Europe. Our WonderMix meets the applicable requirements of Underwriters Laboratories and may only be sold by us in countries supplied by 110 volt electric current. The failure to comply with such requirements or increase in the cost of compliance could adversely affect our operations. Our company is subject to licensing and regulation by a number of governmental authorities, which include health, safety, sanitation, building and fire agencies in Idaho. We are also subject to Federal and state environmental regulations, but these have not had a material effect on our operations to date. Our operations are also subject to Federal and state laws governing such matters as wages, working conditions, citizenship requirements and overtime.
Employees and Consultants
We currently have two employees, both of whom are officers and directors of the Company. None of our employees are represented by a labor union and we believe our relationship with our employees to be good. The loss of our officers, particularly our president, would have a material adverse impact on our business and there is no assurance that we could locate qualified replacements. We have not entered into employment agreements with our officers and we do not carry "key man" life insurance on their lives.
Information about Blackridge
Overview
BlackRidge, located in Reno Nevada, was incorporated in April 2010 to commercialize its military grade and patented network security technology.
BlackRidge develops and markets next generation cyber defense solutions that stop cyber-attacksenables our customers to deliver more secure and block unauthenticated access.resilient business services in today's rapidly evolving technology and cyber threat environments. Our network, server, and servercloud security products are based on our patented Transport Access Control technology and are designed to isolate, cloak and protect servers and cloud services from cyber-attacks and segment networks for regulatory compliance.block unauthenticated access. BlackRidge products are used in enterprise and government computing environments, the industrial Internet of Things (IoT), commercial blockchains, and other cloud service provider and network systems.
The directors of BlackRidge are Robert Graham, John Hayes and Robert Lentz, Thomas Bruderman, Allen Kosowsky, and itsRobert Zahm. Its officers are Robert Graham, Chief Executive Officer and President, John Hayes, Chief Technology Officer, and John Bluher, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary.
The address of the BlackRidge headquarters is: BlackRidge Technology, Holdings, Inc., 10615 Professional Circle,5390 Kietzke Lane, Suite 201,104, Reno, NV 8952189511
Blackridge also has an engineering officeoffices located at BlackRidge Technology, Inc., Marist College Hancock Center 0002, 3399 North Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601 and 100 Century Center Court, Suite 403, San Jose, CA 95112.
.
The general telephone number for BlackRidge is 1-855-807-8776 and our website is www.blackridge.us.
Business
BlackRidgeThe Company develops, markets and supports a family of products that provide a next generation cyber security solution for protecting enterprise networks and cloud services. With our patented technology, network and server resources located in the enterprise, datacenters and cloud systems, are better protected, less expensive to protect, and less vulnerable to compromise from cyber-attacks.cyber-attacks and insider threats. We believe that our identity-based approach to network and cloud security offersoffers superior performance compared to legacy network security approaches, and reduces the total cost of ownership for organizations by eliminating malicious and unwanted traffic from their networks and systems.
BlackRidge products provide advanced capabilities compared to advanced firewalls in applications such as network segmentation and isolating cloud services. BlackRidge also cloaks protected network resources from network mapping, reconnaissance and other forms of unauthorized access and attacks which cannot be blocked by advanced firewalls or malware detection systems.
Our proprietary technology, BlackRidge Transport Access Control (TAC)("TAC"), authenticates user or device identity and applies security policies across networks and cloud services before application sessions are established. Underlying BlackRidge TAC is our patented First Packet Authentication™ which conveys and authenticates identity in the "first packet" of a TCP network session request. This fundamental invention addresses a security gap in how the Internet operates: the inability to authenticate network traffic sources. Without authentication, unidentified and unauthorized users and devices can scan, probe and access networks and cloud services. This security gap is exploited in all cyber-attacks through the process of network scanning and reconnaissance, and it has been further exposed and magnified by cloud services, mobile connectivity, and the Internet of Things (IoT)Things.
BlackRidgeThe Company's technology is first to market with this approach of enforcing security policy based on cryptographically secured identity on every TCP/IP session.
Our products are protected by multiple U.S. Patents including "First Packet Authentication," "Concealing a Network Connected Device," "Digital Identity Authentication," and "Statistical Object Identification."
Products
BlackRidge and our partners sell network security products and solutions based on our proprietary BlackRidge TAC software technology.software. BlackRidge TAC provides high throughput and low latency network security that operates pre-session, in real time, before other security defenses engage. BlackRidge products can be deployed inside a network or a cloud to cloak and protect servers and segment networks, in front of existing security stacks to filter anonymous traffic, or as part of service provider or OEM (as defined below) solution.
The BlackRidge solution is available in the following product configurations, with additional platform support and endpoint under development:
| · | 1U rack-mountable 1GbE or 10GbE network devicesappliance |
| |
| · | 1GbE fanless desktop appliance |
| |
| · | VMware ESXi™ virtual appliance |
| |
| · | IBM z Systems™ LPAR and IBM z/VM® software appliances |
| |
| · | Amazon Web Services appliances |
| |
| · | Windows and IBM SoftLayer® cloud appliancesLinux software endpoints |
BlackRidge products are priced on a per appliance or gateway basis and on the total number of user and device identities supported in an implemenation.implementation. Enterprise and OEM licensing along with subscription pricing are available. BlackRidge appliances can support up to 100,000 identities and 4,000,000 sessions, providing a highly scalable enterprise solution.solution that operates with low latency and high throughput compared to current network security devices.
Network and cloud deployments options include deploying in-line as a Layer 2 transparent bridge or logically inline as a Layer 3 gateway for cloud deployments. BlackRidge software and systems are designed to be highly resilient and can be configured for high availability and failover. Security policies can be verified during deployment with progressive modes of bridge, monitor and audit, and then enforce policy.
Support and Maintenance
BlackRidge offers Standardstandard and Premium Supportpremium support to our end-customers and channel partners, where our channel partners typically deliver level one support and we provide level two and level three support. The support for our end customers includes ongoing maintenance services for both hardware and software in order to receive software upgrades, bug fixes, and repairs. End customers typically purchase these services for a one year or longer term at the time of the initial product sale and typically renew for successive one year or longer periods.
Professional Services.
Professional services are primarily delivered through our channel partners and include experts who plan, design, and deploy effective security solutions tailored to our end-customers' specific requirements. These services include solution design and planning, configuration, and installation. Our education services provide online and classroom-style training and are also primarily delivered through our internal team.
Technology Alliance Partners
BlackRidge participates in an ecosystem of Technology Alliance Partnerstechnology alliance partners to extend the breadth and depth of our products and partner solutions. By helping to ease the complications that organizations face when implementing multi-layered security solutions, our technology alliances facilitate integrated solution design, accelerate the time to realize value, and enhance our role as a strategic security partner.
Markets, Customers and Distribution Channels
The BlackRidge network security and adaptive cyber defense solution is broadly applicable to virtually all enterprise, government and governmentindustrial control market segments. Whether deployed directly in a customer's environment or consumedembedded as part of partner cloud service or solution, BlackRidge provides a new level of cyber defense not available in the market today.
BlackRidge markets and sells its products through multiple channels, including direct sales, integrator and reseller channel partners, cloud and managed service providers, and through strategic Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) ("OEM") partners to both government and commercial users. The initial sales focus and market entry strategy for BlackRidge was the US Department of Defense, which is a key leverage point for the company's current commercial, government, and governmentinternational sales efforts. Our customers and partners include IBM, Ciena, Crimson Logic, the US Department of Defense, the US Department of Energy, Marist College, Nihon Cornet Technology, Splunk and some large financial institutions.healthcare providers.
ForWithin the commercial markets, BlackRidge sells both direct and also withthrough our strategic partners to large enterprise accounts, and indirectly through certain channel partners to specific verticalverticals and international market segments. Our initial commercial market entry strategy for the commercial market is to sell directly in order to and establish customer and analyst references with large enterprises in North America that have high security and compliance requirementsrequirements. These include more complex regulated enterprises such as Financial Services, Healthcare, Insurance and InsuranceUtility companies. ChannelOur channel partners are recruited to assist with expanding enterprise sales, addressingcommercializing specific vertical markets, and for selling and delivering inpenetrating the international markets and other vertical markets. Revenue from commercial sales includes product licensing fees, installation services, and annual support based on a standard price list.
ForIn the government markets, BlackRidge sells its standard commercial products through a wholly owned subsidiary, BlackRidge Technology Government, to government resellers, integrators and contractors who sellresell to the Department of Defense (DOD) and civilian agencies. BlackRidge has been involved with the DOD for over fivesix years, including receivingour initial product development funding.funding which was provided by the U.S. DOD. The BlackRidge products have been designed intofor several large DOD programs and they have been extensively tested and validated for use.use by the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) labs. The timing of the DOD adoption of BlackRidge products depends on approval of budgets and final product testing approvals from the DOD.DISA. BlackRidge Government revenue is net of government discounts, contracting fees, and channel and service partner discounts.
The BlackRidge OEM and service provider partnership strategy is to make targeted investments to capitalize on opportunities in specific market segments such as the industrial Internet of Things (IoT), network and server equipment providers,blockchain networks, and cloud solution providers. For these markets and our partners, BlackRidge TAC iscan be deployed as an integrated or embedded capability in the partners' equipment and vertical market solutions, and it will be sold and supported by theour partner. BlackRidge provides unique, integrated identity-based cyber defense for these OEM products or service offerings that provides themtheir end user customer with a competitive market advantage in the face of today's advanced cyber threats. Revenue from OEM offerings comesflows from embedded product licensing fees and support fees that may beare somewhat unique to each OEM offering.
Marketing
Our marketing is focused on building our brand reputation and market awareness for our company and our unique technology capabilities and platform, driving customer demand and building a strong sales pipeline, and working with our channel and OEM partners. Our marketing team when fully developed will consistconsists of corporate marketing, channelproduct marketing lead development,and product management, marketing operations, and corporate communications. Marketing activities include sales training and enablement, demand generation programs, digital marketing programs, product launch activities, managing our corporate and investor website, social media, trade shows and conferences, and press and analyst relations.
Research and Development
We continue to enhance our BlackRidge TAC software, the core software used in the BlackRidge products. This software is responsible for the TAC token generation, token validation, the token cache, packet processing and the insertion of TAC tokens into TCP connection requests. The TAC software has been developed domestically within the U.S. using only U.S. citizens. This software includes implementations of granted and pending patents owned by BlackRidge.
We continue to pursue research and development to improve our existing products. These improvements include making our products easier to manage, easier to deploy in large numbers, and improvements in our integrations with 3rd3rd party products that communicate with BlackRidge products.
Our product development efforts release software with new features from time to time. When a new feature is significant enough, we produce a major software release. In between major software releases, there may be one or more minor software releases that also introduce less significant new features.
Intellectual Property
BlackRidge focuses on developing patent protection for products it develops and for products and features that are anticipated. We constantly perfect and file new applications. We continue to develop our products; we will continue to file additional patent applications where appropriate.
The granted patents focus on the communication of identity tokens at the network layer (6,973,496, 8,346,951), combining Identity authentication at different security layers (8,281,127, 8,635,445), insuring the integrity of token authentication (8,572,697) and using identity to select amongst a set of trusted resources (9,118,644). The pending applications focus on extending the above protections (13/987,747, 14/544,987, 14/998,645), using network identity in a firewall (14/545,988), making network routing policy decisions using identity (14/999,317) and detecting tampering of hardware and software systems (13/199,050).
As of release 3.0, our products use the technology described in patents 6,973,496, 8,346,951 and 8,572,697 as well as technology described in some of our pending applications. As we continue to add products and features, we will be incorporating technology described in additional patents and applications. All patents and completed applications are assigned to BlackRidge Technology Holdings, Inc.
Granted Patents
Concealing a Network Connected Device US Patent number 6,973,496,, Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 10/094,425. Filed 5 March 2002, Granted 6 December 2005, 1 Claim.
Method for Digital Identity Authentication US Patent number 8,281,127,, Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 12/658,113. Filed 1 February 2010, Granted 2 October 2012, 20 Claims.
Method for First Packet Authentication US Patent number 8,346,951,, Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 11/242,637. Filed 30 Sept 2005, Granted 1 January 2013, 25 Claims.
Method for Statistical Object Identification US Patent number 8,572,697,, Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 13/373,586. Filed 18 November 2011, Granted 29 October 2013, 43 Claims.
Method for Digital Identity Authentication US Patent number 8,635,445,, Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 13/573,077. Filed 16 August 2012, Granted 21 January 2014, 23 Claims.
Method for Directing Requests to Trusted Resources US Patent number 9,118,644,, Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 13/573,238. Filed 30 August 2012, Granted 25 August 2015, 27 Claims.
Published Pending Applications
Method for Statistical Object Identification Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 13/987,747,, filed 27 August 2013, continuation-in-part of Patent 8,572,697.
Unpublished Pending Applications
U.S. Patent Applications are published by the patent office 18 months after filing.
Method for Network Security Using Statistical Object Identification Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 14/544,987, filed 11 March 2015, continuation-in-part of Patent 8,572,697.
Method for Attribution Security System Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 14/545,988, filed 13 July 2015.
Method for Statistical Object Identification Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 14/998,645, filed 16 January 2016, continuation-in-part of Patent 8,572,697.
Method for Using Authenticated Requests to Select Network Routes Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. 14/999,317, filed 22 April 2016.
Secure Cloud Computing System Patent Application U.S. Ser. No. pending, filed 6 August 2016, continuation-in-part of Patent Applications U.S. Ser. No. 13/199,050 and 13/999,757.
Competition
BlackRidge TAC operates at the Transport Layer to provide a highly scalable, non-interactive authentication protocol that does not rely on signatures, sandboxing, or deep packet inspection. This provides key competitive differentiators including high through-put with very low latency, compatibility with existing network and security technologies and middle boxes, address and topology independent, and supports it network address translation (NAT).
We compete with other technology research and development, and sales companies for enterprise security spending and for financing from a limited number of investors that are prepared to invest in such companies. The presence of competing companies in our field of endeavor may impact our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations or further acquisitions, if investors perceive that investments in our competitors are more attractive based on the merit of their technologies, or the advanced stage of marketing or development or the price of the investment opportunity. We face competition from many companies, major universities and research institutions in the United States and abroad. Many of our competitors have substantially greater resources, experience in conducting research, experience in obtaining regulatory approvals for their products, operating experience, research and development and marketing capabilities, name recognition and production capabilities. We will face competition from companies marketing existing products or developing new products which may render our technologies (and products) obsolete.
These companies may have numerous competitive advantages, including:
| · | significantly greater name recognition; |
| |
| · | established distribution networks; |
| |
| · | more advanced technologies and product development; |
| |
| · | additional lines of products, and the ability to offer rebates, higher discounts or incentives; and |
| |
| · | greater experience in conducting research and development, manufacturing, obtaining regulatory approval for products |
Our commercial success will dependdepends on our ability to compete effectively in product development areas such as, but not limited to, safety, price, marketing and distribution. There can be no assurance that competitors will not succeed in developing products that are more effective than our cyber security technology, therefore rendering our products obsolete and noncompetitive. Accordingly, in addition to our research and development efforts, we believe we need to create a public relations/advertising program designed to establish our "brand" name recognition; we intend to continue to develop and market our brand name pending commercialization of products, if any, we may derive from our research and development efforts.
We believe ourOur strategy ultimately will facilitatedrives the marketing, distribution and public acceptance of any products we may derive from our research and development. Competition with respect to our technologies is and will be based, among other things, on effectiveness, latency, reliability, availability, price, marketing, distribution and patent position. Another important factor will be the timing of market introduction of any new versions of the software or development of new products and cyber security solutions new markets such asindustrial control systems (ICS) and the Industrial Internet of Things ("IoT"IIoT").
Accordingly, the speed with which we can distribute and sell products and the speed to market with new or updated versions of the existing software, complete testing and proof of concept processes and ultimately supply commercial quantities of our products to the market and channels is expected to be an important competitive factor.
Our competitive position will also depend upon our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, to obtain patent protection or otherwise develop proprietary products or processes, and to secure sufficient capital resources for the often-substantial period between technological conception and commercial sales.
Government Regulations
We are not yet aware of any specific, direct government regulations relating to the manufacture of our product; however, the manufacture will be subject to various general federal, and state laws governing manufacturing. As a software manufacturer, we will be responsible for ensuring that the products are manufactured and supplied for distribution in compliance with all laws.
BlackRidge exports products in compliance with the International Traffic in Arms Regulations that control the export and import of defense-related articles and services on the United States Munitions List. BlackRidge is authorized to export and re-export encryption products as described in Part 740-17 (b) (1) of the Export Administration Regulations EAR and mass market encryption products as described in Part 74215 (b) (1).
Environmental Regulations
We expect to comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations relating to our business, and at this time, we do not anticipate incurring any material capital expenditures to comply with any environmental regulations or other requirements. While our products, intended projects and business activities do not currently violate any laws, any regulatory changes that impose additional restrictions or requirements on us or on our potential customers could adversely affect us by increasing our operating costs or decreasing demand for our products or services, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Employees of BlackRidge
As of March 30, 2017,2018, we have 2244 full time employees and 4 part-time employees. We also engage ----22a number of independent contractors as engineers, system architects, or developers. The Blackridge employees are not represented by unions and it considers its relationship with its employees to be good.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Risk Factors
Blackridge has had operating losses each year since its inception, and may not achieve or maintain profitability in the future.
Blackridge has incurred operating losses each year since its inception, including net losses of $15,345,644 and $7,215,820 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our totaloperating expenses have increased as we have expanded our sales decreased by $520,744,and marketing efforts and we continue to invest in research and development of our technologies. These efforts may be more costly in the future than we expect, and we may not be able to increase our revenue to offset our increased operating expenses. Our revenue growth may slow or approximately 34%,our revenue may decline for a number of other reasons, including reduced demand for our platform, increased competition, a decrease in the growth or size of the IT security market, particularly the market for solutions that target the next generation of advanced cyber-attacks, or any failure to capitalize on growth opportunities. Any failure to increase our revenue as we grow our business could prevent us from achieving or maintaining profitability. If we are unable to meet these risks and challenges as we encounter them, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer.
The Blackridge audited financial statements contain a "going concern" qualification noting that during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared2017, we incurred a net loss of $15,345,644 and inception to date losses are $49,896,376, which factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
The independent registered public accounting firm for Blackridge for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, has included an explanatory paragraph in their opinion that accompanies the Blackridge audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. We believe there continues2017, indicating that we incurred a net loss of $15,345,644 and inception to date losses are $49,896,376, which factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. In this regard, management is proposing to raise any necessary additional funds not provided by operations through investment capital. There is no assurance that we will be an overall slow-downsuccessful in raising this additional capital or in achieving profitable operations. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Blackridge do not include any adjustments that might result if we are unable to continue as a going concern and, therefore, be required to realize our assets and discharge our liabilities other than in the preparedness market and continued slow economic recoverynormal course of business which could cause investors to suffer the loss of all or a substantial portion of their investment.
We may be unsuccessful in the United States.raising additional capital. If we are unable to significantly increaseraise additional financing, we will be under-capitalized and will not be able to execute our sales, it could cause us to operatebusiness plan as forecast. Such financing difficulties would likely reduce the value of your investment in the Registrant.
BlackRidge is a recently formed company, with limited operating history. BlackRidge was formed in 2010 and has generated limited revenue. To date, BlackRidge has operated at a lossloss. Prior to BlackRidge, management of BlackRidge has not previously worked together in a company. There is, therefore, no guarantee that management will work well together and require usexecute the business plan of BlackRidge successfully.
BlackRidge is likely to obtain additionallose money for a period of time.
BlackRidge, like many early stage companies, is projected to lose money for several months before it reaches cash-flow break even. Such projections may turn out to be too optimistic and BlackRidge may lose more money or for longer than forecast, hurting the value of an investment.
To the extent that BlackRidge's business plan relies on future access to financing, you are incurring the risk of future dilution.
The market for raising capital for small public companies is currently challenging and may remain challenging for the indefinite future. Therefore, future financings by the Registrant may either be not possible or only done on terms that are detrimental to meet our obligationsexisting debt and continue our operations.equity holders of the Company.
Our total sales decreasedbusiness plan is dependent on the success of Blackridge's existing technologies and new technologies which may be developed by $520,744,BlackRidge's engineering team.
There is no guarantee that BlackRidge's technologies will achieve wide acceptance at an economically attractive price point or approximately 34%, duringthat BlackRidge's engineering department will develop new technologies which are commercially feasible. BlackRidge's technologies also run the year ended December 31, 2016 compared torisk of technological obsolescence as they are based on the year ended December 31, 2015. Wd believe there continues to be an overall slow-downcurrent architecture of the internet.
Real or perceived defects, errors or vulnerabilities in our platform or the preparedness market and continued slow economic recovery in the United States. If we are unable to significantly increase our sales, it could cause us to operate at a loss and require us to obtain additional capital to meet our obligations and continue our operations. We are hopeful that the introductionfailure of our new WonderMix product will continueplatform to increase our sales, but no assurances can be given to that effect nor can we offer any assurance that the new product will be accepted in the market.
Historically, we have only manufactured and distributed one product line and this lack of diversification subjects us to additional risks in the event sales of such product line should decline
Historically we have manufactured under contract and distributed only the WonderMill and Wonder Junior Hand Grain Mill and we have been dependent on sales of such products in order to conduct profitable operations. Notwithstanding the recent introduction of our Wondermix product, if sales of such WonderMill products should decline for any reason including, changes in consumer taste, the introduction of new competing products, damage toblock DDOS attacks, malware or prevent a security breach could harm our reputation in connection with product liability or customer complaints, or any number of other reasons, such decrease in sales may be anticipated to have a material adverse effect onand adversely impact our business, financial position and results of operations.
Our relianceBecause the techniques used by computer hackers to access or sabotage networks change frequently and generally are not recognized until launched against a target, there is a risk that an advanced attack could emerge that our platform is unable to detect or prevent. Moreover, as our platform is adopted by an increasing number of enterprises and governments, it is possible that the individuals and organizations behind advanced malware attacks will begin to focus on manufacturing facilitiesfinding ways to defeat our software. If this happens, our networks, products, subscriptions and suppliersservices could be targeted by attacks specifically designed to disrupt our business and undermine the perception that our platform is capable of providing superior IT security, which, in India and Korea could make us vulnerable to supply interruptions related to the political, legal and cultural environments in India and Korea
Our products are manufactured by third-party manufacturers in India and Korea. Our ability to continue to select reliable vendors who provide timely deliveries of quality parts and products will impact our success in meeting customer demand for timely delivery of quality products. Furthermore, the ability of third-party manufacturers to timely deliver finished goods and/or raw materials, may be affected by events beyond their control, such as inability of shippers to timely deliver merchandise due to work stoppages or slowdowns, or significant weather and health conditions (such as SARS) affecting manufacturers and/or shippers. Any adverse change in, among other things, any of the followingturn, could have a material adverse effectserious impact on our business, resultsreputation as a provider of operations and financial condition:
our relationship with third-party manufacturers;
the financial condition of our third-party manufacturers or their suppliers;
our ability to import products from these third-party manufacturers; or
our third-party manufacturers' ability to manufacture and deliver outsourced products on a timely basis.virtual machine-based security solutions.
We cannot assure you that we could quickly or effectively replaceIf any of our manufacturerscustomers becomes infected with malware after adopting our platform, even if our platform has blocked the need arose, and we cannot assure you that we could retrieve tooling and molds possessed bytheft of any of such customer's data, such customer could nevertheless be disappointed with our third-party manufacturers. Our dependence on these two suppliersplatform. Furthermore, if any enterprises or governments that are publicly known to use our platform are the subject of an advanced cyber-attack that becomes publicized, our other current or potential customers may look to our competitors for alternatives to our platform. Real or perceived security breaches of our customers' networks could alsocause disruption or damage to their networks or other negative consequences and could result in negative publicity to us, damage to our reputation, declining sales, increased expenses and customer relations issues.
Furthermore, our software may fail to detect or prevent malware, viruses, worms or similar threats for any number of reasons, including our failure to enhance and expand our software to reflect industry trends, new technologies and new operating environments. Failure to keep pace with technological changes in the IT security industry and changes in the threat landscape could adversely affect our ability to react quicklyprotect against security breaches and effectivelycould cause us to changeslose customers.
Any real or perceived defects, errors or vulnerabilities in our software, or any other failure of our software to detect an advanced threat, could result in:
| • | a loss of existing or potential customers or channel partners; |
| |
| • | delayed or lost revenue; |
| |
| • | a delay in attaining, or the failure to attain, market acceptance; |
| |
| • | the expenditure of significant financial and product development resources in efforts to analyze, correct, eliminate, or work around errors or defects, to address and eliminate vulnerabilities, or to identify and ramp up production with alternative third-party manufacturers; |
| |
| • | an increase in warranty claims, or an increase in the cost of servicing warranty claims, either of which would adversely affect our gross margins; |
| |
| • | harm to our reputation or brand; and |
| |
| • | litigation, regulatory inquiries, or investigations that may be costly and further harm our reputation. |
Our CEO and CTO have limited prior experience with government sales.
BlackRidge's business plan is, in part, to sell to government contractors, the Department of Defense and other "government" clients as well as to the commercial marketplace. Mr. Graham, the Company's CEO and co-founder of Blackridge has past experience in government sales and contracting groups.Mr. Hayes, the Company's CTO and co-founder of Blackridge, has no prior experience selling to the government. Government sales have several unique aspects which require a different approach than commercial sales and may have a longer sales cycle. In order to mitigate this risk, we have appointed an advisory counsel with experience in government sales, as well partnered with companies experienced in government contracts.
Pending patent applications may be denied.
While BlackRidge owns issued U.S. patents on its core technology, there is no guarantee that other applications will result in granted patents. Furthermore, given the nature of the US Patent Office, the determination of patentability may take several years. Even with its existing patents, enforcing patent rights can be an expensive and time-consuming process, involving years of litigation and large legal fees.
Fluctuating economic conditions make it difficult to predict revenue for a particular period, and a shortfall in revenue may harm our operating results.
Our revenue depends significantly on general economic conditions and the demand for products in the market forIT security market. Economic weakness, customer financial difficulties, and constrained spending on IT security may result in decreased revenue and earnings. Such factors could make it difficult to accurately forecast our products.sales and operating results and could negatively affect our ability to provide accurate forecasts to our contract manufacturers and manage our contract manufacturer relationships and other expenses. In addition, international manufacturing is subject to significant risks, including, among other things:
labor unrest;
social, politicalconcerns regarding the impact of tight budgetary constraints and economic instability;
restrictionsthe new Trump Administration on transferthe IT budgets of funds;
domesticvarious agencies of the U.S. government, as well as continued budgetary challenges in the United States and international customsgeopolitical turmoil in many parts of the world have and tariffs;
unexpected changes in regulatory environments; and
potentially adverse tax consequences.
Labor in India and Korea has historically been readily available at relatively low cost as compared to labor costs in North America. However, both countries have experienced rapid social, political and economic changes in recent years. We cannot assure you that labor willmay continue to put pressure on global economic conditions and overall spending on IT security. Currently, most enterprises and governments have not allocated a fixed portion of their budgets to protect against next-generation advanced cyber-attacks. If we do not succeed in convincing customers that our platform should be availablean integral part of their overall approach to usIT security and that a fixed portion of their annual IT budgets should be allocated to our platform, general reductions in India or Korea at costs consistent with historical levels or that changes in labor or other laws will not be enacted which wouldIT spending by our customers are likely to have a material adverse effect on our operations in such countries. A substantial increase in labor costs in India or Korea could have a material adverse effectdisproportionate impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. No assurancesGeneral economic weakness may also lead to longer collection cycles for payments due from our customers, an increase in customer bad debt, restructuring initiatives and associated expenses, and impairment of investments.
Uncertainty about future economic conditions also makes it difficult to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments. Future or continued economic weakness for us or our customers, failure of our customers and markets to recover from such weakness, customer financial difficulties, and reductions in spending on IT security could have a material adverse effect on demand for our platform and consequently on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our results of operations are likely to vary significantly from period to period, which could cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.
Our results of operations have varied significantly from period to period, and we expect that following the Reorganization, our results of operations will continue to vary as a result of a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control and may be difficult to predict, including:
| • | our ability to attract and retain new customers; |
| |
| • | the budgeting cycles, seasonal buying patterns and purchasing practices of customers; |
| |
| • | the timing of shipments of our products and length of our sales cycles; |
| |
| • | changes in customer or reseller requirements or market needs; |
| |
| • | changes in the growth rate of the IT security market, particularly the market for threat protection solutions like ours that target next-generation advanced cyber-attacks; |
| |
| • | the timing and success of new product and service introductions by us or our competitors or any other change in the competitive landscape of the IT security market, including consolidation among our customers or competitors; |
| |
| • | the level of awareness of IT security threats, particularly advanced cyber-attacks, and the market adoption of our software; |
| |
| • | deferral of orders from customers in anticipation of new products or product enhancements announced by us or our competitors; |
| |
| • | our ability to successfully expand our business domestically and internationally; |
| |
| • | reductions in customer renewal rates for our subscriptions; |
| |
| • | decisions by organizations to purchase IT security solutions from larger, more established security vendors or from their primary IT equipment vendors; |
| |
| • | changes in our pricing policies or those of our competitors; |
| |
| • | any disruption in, or termination of, our relationship with channel partners; |
| |
| • | decreases in our customers' subscription renewal rates; |
| |
| • | our inability to fulfill our customers' orders due to supply chain delays or events that impact our manufacturers or their suppliers; |
| |
| • | insolvency or credit difficulties confronting our customers, affecting their ability to purchase or pay for our products, subscriptions and services, or confronting our key suppliers, particularly our sole source suppliers, which could disrupt our supply chain; |
| |
| • | the cost and potential outcomes of existing and future litigation; |
| |
| • | seasonality in our business; |
| |
| • | general economic conditions, both domestic and in our foreign markets; |
| |
| • | future accounting pronouncements or changes in our accounting policies or practices; |
| |
| • | the amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures related to the expansion of our business; |
| |
| • | a change in our mix of products, subscriptions and services; and |
| |
| • | increases or decreases in our expenses caused by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. |
Any of the above factors, individually or in the aggregate, may result in significant fluctuations in our financial and other operating results from period to period. As a result of this variability, our historical results of operations should not be relied upon as an indication of future performance. Moreover, this variability and unpredictability could result in our failure to meet our operating plan or the expectations of investors or analysts for any period. If we fail to meet such expectations for these or other reasons, the market price of our common stock could fall substantially, and we could face costly lawsuits, including securities class action suits.
We face intense competition and could fail to gain market share from our competitors, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The market for security products and services is intensely competitive and characterized by rapid changes in technology, customer requirements, industry standards and frequent new product introductions and improvements. We anticipate continued challenges from current competitors, which in many cases are more established and enjoy greater resources than us, as well as by new entrants into the industry. If we are unable to anticipate or effectively react to these competitive challenges, our competitive position could weaken, and we could experience a decline in our growth rate or revenue that could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Our competitors and potential competitors include large networking vendors such as Cisco Systems, Inc. and Juniper Networks, Inc. that may emulate or integrate features similar to ours into their own products; large companies such as Intel and HP that have acquired large IT security specialist vendors in recent years and have the technical and financial resources and broad customer bases needed to bring competitive solutions to the market; independent IT security vendors such as FireEye, Symantec, and Palo Alto Networks that offer products that claim to perform similar functions to our platform; and small and large companies that offer point solutions that compete with some of the features present in our platform. Other IT providers offer, and may continue to introduce, security features that compete with our platform, either in stand-alone security products or as additional features in their network infrastructure products. Many of our existing competitors have, and some of our potential competitors could have, substantial competitive advantages such as:
| • | greater name recognition, longer operating histories and larger customer bases; |
| |
| • | larger sales and marketing budgets and resources; |
| |
| • | broader distribution and established relationships with channel and distribution partners and customers; |
| |
| • | greater customer support resources; |
| |
| • | greater resources to make acquisitions; |
| |
| • | lower labor and research and development costs; |
| |
| • | larger and more mature intellectual property portfolios; and |
| |
| • | substantially greater financial, technical and other resources. |
In addition, some of our larger competitors have substantially broader product offerings and may be able to leverage their relationships with distribution partners and customers based on other products or incorporate functionality into existing products to gain business in a manner that discourages users from purchasing our products, subscriptions and services, including by selling at zero or negative margins, product bundling or offering closed technology platforms. Potential customers may also prefer to purchase from their existing suppliers rather than a new supplier regardless of product performance or features. As a result, even if the features of our platform are superior, customers may not purchase our products. In addition, new innovative start-up companies, and larger companies that are making significant investments in research and development, may invent similar or superior products and technologies that compete with our platform. Our current and potential competitors may also establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties that may further enhance their resources. If we are unable to compete successfully, or if competing successfully requires us to take costly actions in response to the actions of our competitors, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Our sales cycles can be givenlong and unpredictable, and our sales efforts require considerable time and expense. As a result, our sales and revenue are difficult to predict and may vary substantially from period to period, which may cause our results of operations to fluctuate significantly.
Our results of operations may fluctuate, in part, because of the resource intensive nature of our sales efforts, the length and variability of our sales cycle and the short-term difficulty in adjusting our operating expenses. Our results of operations depend in part on sales to large organizations. The length of our sales cycle, from proof of concept to delivery of and payment for our platform, is typically three to six months but can be more than a year. To the extent our competitors develop products that our prospective customers view as equivalent to ours, our average sales cycle may increase. Because the length of time required to close a sale varies substantially from customer to customer, it is difficult to predict exactly when, or even if, we will make a sale with a potential customer. As a result, large individual sales have, in some cases, occurred in quarters subsequent to those we anticipated, or have not occurred at all. The loss or delay of one or more large transactions in a quarter could impact our results of operations for that quarter and any future quarters for which revenue from that transaction is delayed. As a result of these factors, it is difficult for us to forecast our revenue accurately in any quarter. Because a substantial portion of our expenses are relatively fixed in the short term, our results of operations will suffer if our revenue falls below our or analysts' expectations in a particular quarter, which could cause the price of our common stock to decline.
If we do not accurately anticipate and respond promptly to changes in our customers' technologies, business plans or security needs, our competitive position and prospects could be harmed.
Many of our customers operate in markets characterized by rapidly changing technologies and business plans, which require them to add numerous network access points and adapt to increasingly complex IT networks, incorporating a variety of hardware, software applications, operating systems and networking protocols. As their technologies and business plans grow more complex, we expect these customers to face new and increasingly sophisticated methods of attack. We face significant challenges in ensuring that our platform effectively identifies and responds to these advanced and evolving attacks without disrupting our customers' network performance. As a result of the continued rapid innovations in the technology industry, including the rapid growth of smart phones, tablets and other devices and the trend of "bring your own device" in enterprises, we expect the networks of our customers to continue to change rapidly and become more complex.
We have identified a number of new products and enhancements to our platform that we believe are important to our continued success in the IT security market. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in developing and marketing, on a timely basis, such new products or enhancements, or that our new products or enhancements will adequately address the changing needs of the marketplace. In addition, some of our new products and enhancements may require us to develop new hardware architectures that involve complex, expensive and time-consuming research and development processes. Although the market expects rapid introduction of new products and enhancements to respond to new threats, the development of these products and enhancements is difficult and the timetable for commercial release and availability is uncertain, as there can be significant time lags between initial beta releases and the commercial availability of new products and enhancements. We may experience unanticipated delays in the availability of new products and enhancements to our platform and fail to meet customer expectations with respect to the timing of such availability. If we do not quickly respond to the rapidly changing and rigorous needs of our customers by developing, releasing and making available on a timely basis new products and enhancements to our platform that can adequately respond to advanced threats and our customers' needs, our competitive position and business prospects will be harmed. Furthermore, from time to time, we or our competitors may announce new products with capabilities or technologies that could have the potential to replace or shorten the life cycles of our existing products. There can be no assurance that announcements of new products will not cause customers to defer purchasing our existing products.
Additionally, the process of developing new technology is expensive, complex and uncertain. The success of new products and enhancements depends on several factors, including appropriate component costs, timely completion and introduction, differentiation of new products and enhancements from those of our competitors, and market acceptance. To maintain our competitive position, we must continue to commit significant resources to developing new products or enhancements to our platform before knowing whether these investments will be affectedcost-effective or achieve the intended results. There can be no assurance that we will successfully identify new product opportunities, develop and bring new products or enhancements to market in a timely manner, or achieve market acceptance of our platform, or that products and technologies developed by others will not render our platform obsolete or noncompetitive. If we expend significant resources on researching and developing products or enhancements to our platform and such products or enhancements are not successful, our business, financial position and results of operations may be adversely affected.
If we are unable to sell additional products, licenses, subscriptions and services, as well as renewals of our licenses, subscriptions and services, to our customers, our future revenue and operating results will be harmed.
Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to expand the deployment of our platform with existing customers by selling them additional products, subscriptions and services. This may require increasingly sophisticated and costly sales efforts and may not result in additional sales. In addition, the rate at which our customers purchase additional products, subscriptions and services depends on a number of factors, including the perceived need for additional IT security as well as general economic conditions. If our efforts to sell additional products, subscriptions and services to our customers are not successful, our business may suffer.
Further, existing customers that purchase our platform have no contractual obligation to renew their subscriptions and support and maintenance services after the initial contract period, and given our limited operating history, we may not be able to accurately predict our renewal rates. Our customers' renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of a number of factors, including the level of their satisfaction with our platform, our customer support, customer budgets and the pricing of our platform compared with the products and services offered by our competitors. If our customers renew their subscriptions, they may renew for shorter contract lengths or on other terms that are less economically beneficial to us. We cannot assure you that our customers will renew their subscriptions, and if our customers do not renew their subscriptions or renew on less favorable terms, our revenue may grow more slowly than expected, if at all.
If we are unable to increase sales of our platform to large organizations while mitigating the risks associated with serving such customers, our business, financial position and results of operations may suffer.
Our growth strategy is dependent, in part, upon increasing sales of our platform to large enterprises and governments. Sales to large customers involve risks that may not be present (or that are present to a lesser extent) with sales to smaller entities. These risks include:
| • | increased purchasing power and leverage held by large customers in negotiating contractual arrangements with us; |
| |
| • | more stringent or costly requirements imposed upon us in our support service contracts with such customers, including stricter support response times and penalties for any failure to meet support requirements; |
| |
| • | more complicated implementation processes; |
| |
| • | longer sales cycles and the associated risk that substantial time and resources may be spent on a potential customer that ultimately elects not to purchase our platform or purchases less than we hoped; |
| |
| • | closer relationships with, and dependence upon, large technology companies who offer competitive products; and |
| |
| • | more pressure for discounts and write-offs. |
In addition, because security breaches with respect to larger, high-profile enterprises are likely to be heavily publicized, there is increased reputational risk associated with serving such customers. If we are unable to increase sales of our platform to large enterprise and government customers while mitigating the risks associated with serving such customers, our business, financial position and results of operations may suffer.
Our current research and development efforts may not produce successful products or enhancements to our platform that result in significant revenue, cost savings or other benefits in the near future, if at all.
We must continue to dedicate significant financial and other resources to our research and development efforts if we are to maintain our competitive position. However, developing products and enhancements to our platform is expensive and time consuming, and there is no assurance that such activities will result in significant new marketable products or enhancements to our platform, design improvements, cost savings, revenue or other expected benefits. If we spend significant time and effort on research and development and are unable to generate an adequate return on our investment, our business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property adequately, which could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We believe that our intellectual property is an essential asset of our business. We rely on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions, to establish and protect our intellectual property rights in the United States and abroad. The efforts we have taken to protect our intellectual property may not be sufficient or effective, and our trademarks, copyrights and patents may be held invalid or unenforceable. Any U.S. or other patents issued to us may not be sufficiently broad to protect our proprietary technologies. We may not be effective in policing unauthorized use of our intellectual property, and even if we do detect violations, litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights. Any enforcement efforts we undertake, including litigation, could be time-consuming and expensive, could divert management's attention and may result in a court determining that our intellectual property rights are unenforceable. If we are not successful in cost-effectively protecting our intellectual property rights, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be harmed.
Claims by others that we infringe their proprietary technology or other rights could harm our business.
Technology companies frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of patent infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. In addition, patent holding companies seek to monetize patents they have purchased or otherwise obtained. As we face increasing competition and gain an increasingly higher profile, the possibility of intellectual property rights claims against us grows. From time to time, we expect that third parties may assert, claims of infringement of intellectual property rights against us. Third parties may in the future also assert claims against our customers or channel partners, whom our standard license and other agreements obligate us to indemnify against claims that our products infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties. While we intend to increase the size of our patent portfolio, many of our competitors and others may now and in the future have significantly larger and more mature patent portfolios than we have. In addition, future litigation may involve patent holding companies or other patent owners who have no relevant product offerings or revenue and against whom our own patents may therefore provide little or no deterrence or protection. Any claim of intellectual property infringement by a third party, even a claim without merit, could cause us to incur substantial costs defending against such claim, could distract our management from our business and could require us to cease use of such intellectual property. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by the aforementioneddiscovery process.
Although third parties may offer a license to their technology or other intellectual property, the terms of any offered license may not be acceptable, and the failure to obtain a license or the costs associated with any license could cause our business, financial condition and results of operations to be materially and adversely affected. In addition, some licenses may be non-exclusive, and therefore our competitors may have access to the same technology licensed to us. If a third party does not offer us a license to its technology or other intellectual property on reasonable terms, or at all, we could be enjoined from continued use of such intellectual property. As a result, we may be required to develop alternative, non-infringing technology, which could require significant time (during which we could be unable to continue to offer our affected products, subscriptions or services), effort, and expense and may ultimately not be successful. Furthermore, a successful claimant could secure a judgment or we may agree to a settlement that prevents us from distributing certain products, providing certain subscriptions or performing certain services or that requires us to pay substantial damages, royalties or other fees. Any of these events could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We rely on our management team and other key employees and will need additional personnel to grow our business, and the loss of one or more key employees or our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could harm our business.
Our future success is substantially dependent on our ability to attract, retain and motivate the members of our management team and other key employees throughout our organization. We may not be successful in attracting qualified personnel to fulfill our current or future needs. Our competitors may be successful in recruiting and hiring members of our management team or other key employees, and it may be difficult for us to find suitable replacements on a timely basis, on competitive terms, or at all. Also, to the extent we hire employees from mature public companies with significant financial resources, we may be subject to allegations that such employees have been improperly solicited, or that they have divulged proprietary or other confidential information or that their former employers own such employees' inventions or other work product.
In addition, we believe that it is important to establish and maintain a corporate culture that facilitates the maintenance and transfer of institutional knowledge within our organization and also fosters innovation, teamwork, a passion for customers and a focus on execution. Our Chief Executive Officer and certain other key members of our management and finance teams have only been working together for a relatively short period of time, and we expect to add additional vice presidents and other members of management in the foreseeable future. If we are not successful in integrating these key employees into our organization, such failure could delay or hinder our product development efforts and the achievement of our strategic objectives, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Most of our employees, including some of our executive officers, work for us on an "at-will" basis, which means they may terminate their employment with us at any time. We do not maintain key person life insurance policies on any of our key employees. If one or more of our key employees resigns or otherwise ceases to provide us with their service, our business could be harmed.
If we are unable to maintain successful relationships with our channel partners and technology alliance partners, or if our channel partners or technology alliance partners fail to perform, our ability to market, sell and distribute our platform will be limited, and our business, financial position and results of operations will be harmed.
In addition to our direct sales force, we rely on our indirect channel partners to sell and support our platform. We expect that sales through channel partners will be a significant percentage of our revenue. We also partner with our technology alliance partners to design go-to-market strategies that combine our platform with products or services provided by our technology alliance partners.
Our agreements with our channel partners and our technology alliance partners are generally non-exclusive, meaning our partners may offer customers products from several different companies, including products that compete with ours. If our channel partners do not effectively market and sell our platform, choose to use greater efforts to market and sell their own products or those of our competitors, or fail to meet the needs of our customers, our ability to grow our business and sell our platform may be adversely affected. Our channel partners and technology alliance partners may cease marketing our platform with limited or no notice and with little or no penalty, and new channel partners require extensive training and may take several months or more to achieve productivity. The loss of a substantial number of our channel partners, our possible inability to replace them, or the failure to recruit additional channel partners could materially and adversely affect our results of operations. In addition, sales by channel partners are more likely than direct sales to involve collectability concerns, particularly in developing markets. Our channel partner structure could also subject us to lawsuits or reputational harm if, for example, a channel partner misrepresents the functionality of our platform to customers or violates applicable laws or our corporate policies.
Our ability to achieve revenue growth in the future will depend in part on our success in maintaining successful relationships with our channel partners, and to train our channel partners to independently sell and deploy our platform. If we are unable to maintain our relationships with these channel partners or otherwise develop and expand our indirect sales channel, or if our channel partners fail to perform, our business, financial position and results of operations could be adversely affected.
U.S. federal, state and local government sales are subject to a number of challenges and risks eachthat may adversely impact our business.
Sales to U.S. federal, state, and local governmental agencies have in the past accounted for, and may in the future account for, a significant portion of our revenue. Sales to such government entities are subject to the following risks:
| • | selling to governmental agencies can be highly competitive, expensive and time consuming, often requiring significant upfront time and expense without any assurance that such efforts will generate a sale; |
| |
| • | government certification requirements applicable to our products may change and in doing so restrict our ability to sell into the U.S. federal government sector until we have attained the revised certification; |
| |
| • | government demand and payment for our products and services may be impacted by public sector budgetary cycles and funding authorizations, with funding reductions or delays adversely affecting public sector demand for our products and services; |
| |
| • | we sell our software to governmental agencies through our indirect channel partners, and these agencies may have statutory, contractual or other legal rights to terminate contracts with our distributors and resellers for convenience or due to a default, and any such termination may adversely impact our future results of operations; and |
| |
| • | governments routinely investigate and audit government contractors' administrative processes, and any unfavorable audit could result in the government refusing to continue buying our platform, which would adversely impact our revenue and results of operations, or institute fines or civil or criminal liability if the audit uncovers improper or illegal activities. |
Our failure to adequately protect personal information could have a material adverse effect on our business.
A wide variety of provincial, state, national, and international laws and regulations apply to the collection, use, retention, protection, disclosure, transfer and other processing of personal data. These data protection and privacy-related laws and regulations are evolving and may result in ever-increasing regulatory and public scrutiny and escalating levels of enforcement and sanctions. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, or to protect such data, could result in enforcement action against us, including fines, imprisonment of company officials and public censure, claims for damages by customers and other affected individuals, damage to our reputation and loss of goodwill (both in relation to existing customers and prospective customers), any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, resultsoperations, financial performance and business. Evolving and changing definitions of operationspersonal data and financial condition. The foregoing factorspersonal information within the European Union, the United States, and elsewhere, especially relating to classification of IP addresses, machine identification, location data and other information, may have a material adverse effect onlimit or inhibit our ability to increaseoperate or maintainexpand our supplybusiness, including limiting technology alliance partners that may involve the sharing of products,data. Even the perception of privacy concerns, whether or not valid, may harm our financial condition or the resultsreputation and inhibit adoption of our operations.products by current and future customers.
ThreeIf the general level of DDOS and advanced cyber-attacks declines, or is perceived by our current or potential customers accountto have declined, our business could be harmed.
Our business is substantially dependent on enterprises and governments recognizing that DDOS and advanced cyber-attacks are pervasive and are not effectively prevented by legacy security solutions. High visibility attacks on prominent enterprises and governments have increased market awareness of the problem of DDOS and advanced cyber-attacks and help to provide an impetus for a significant percententerprises and governments to devote resources to protecting against DDOS and advanced cyber-attacks, such as testing our platform, purchasing it, and broadly deploying it within their organizations. If DDOS and advanced cyber-attacks were to decline, or enterprises or governments perceived that the general level of DDOS and advanced cyber-attacks have declined, our total salesability to attract new customers and the loss of any of suchexpand our offerings within existing customers could be materially and adversely affectaffected. A reduction in the threat landscape could increase our results of operationssales cycles and financial condition
During each ofharm our 2016 and 2015 fiscal years, purchases of our WonderMill products by two retail stores owned by John Hofman and Bruce Crane, our officers, directors and principal stockholders, accounted for approximately 4% and 5%, respectively, of our total sales. In addition, purchases by one other customer accounted for 10% and 7%, respectively, of our total sales during each of our 2016 and 2015 fiscal years. The loss of any of these major customers would be expected to have a material adverse effect on ourbusiness, results of operations and financial condition.
ChangesWe are exposed to the credit risk of some of our distributors and resellers and to credit exposure in the retail industryweakened markets, which could result in material losses.
Most of our sales are on an open credit basis. Although we have programs in place that are designed to monitor and markets for consumer products affectingmitigate these risks, we cannot assure you these programs will be effective in reducing our customers or retailing practicescredit risks, especially as we expand our business internationally. If we are unable to adequately control these risks, our business, results of operations and financial condition could negatively impact existing customer relationshipsbe harmed.
We may acquire other businesses, which could require significant management attention, disrupt our business, dilute stockholder value, and adversely affect our results of operations.
As part of our business strategy, we may acquire or make investments in complementary companies, products or technologies. However, we have not made any large acquisitions to date, and as a result, our ability as an organization to acquire and integrate other companies, products or technologies in a successful manner is unproven. We may not be able to find suitable acquisition candidates, and we may not be able to complete such acquisitions on favorable terms, if at all. If we do complete acquisitions, we may not ultimately strengthen our competitive position or achieve our goals, and any acquisitions we complete could be viewed negatively by our customers, analysts and investors. In addition, if we are unsuccessful at integrating such acquisitions or the technologies associated with such acquisitions, our revenue and results of operations could be adversely affected. Any integration process may require significant time and resources, and we may not be able to manage the process successfully. We may not successfully evaluate or utilize the acquired technology or personnel, or accurately forecast the financial impact of an acquisition transaction, including accounting charges. We may have to pay cash, incur debt or issue equity securities to pay for any such acquisition, each of which could adversely affect our financial condition or the value of our common stock. The sale of equity or issuance of debt to finance any such acquisitions could result in dilution to our stockholders. The incurrence of indebtedness would result in increased fixed obligations and could also include covenants or other restrictions that would impede our ability to manage our operations.
Our failure to raise additional capital or generate the significant capital necessary to expand our operations and invest in new products could reduce our ability to compete and could harm our business.
We sellintend to continue to make investments to support our WonderMill grain millsbusiness growth and may require additional funds to retail dealers,respond to business challenges, including natural foods stores, emergency preparedness stores,the need to develop new products and mass merchant retailers. Aenhancements to our platform, improve our operating infrastructure or acquire complementary businesses and technologies. Accordingly, we may need to engage in equity or debt financings to secure additional funds. If we raise additional equity financing, our stockholders may experience significant deteriorationdilution of their ownership interests and the per share value of our common stock could decline. Furthermore, if we engage in debt financing, the holders of debt would have priority over the holders of common stock, and we may be required to accept terms that restrict our ability to incur additional indebtedness. We may also be required to take other actions that would otherwise be in the interests of the debt holders and force us to maintain specified liquidity or other ratios, any of which could harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition. If we need additional capital and cannot raise it on acceptable terms, we may not be able to, among other things:
| • | develop or enhance our products and subscriptions; |
| |
| • | continue to expand our sales and marketing and research and development organizations; |
| |
| • | acquire complementary technologies, products or businesses; |
| |
| • | expand operations, in the United States or internationally; |
| |
| • | hire, train and retain employees; or |
| |
| • | respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated working capital requirements. |
Our failure to do any of these things could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If our major customersproducts do not effectively interoperate with our customers' IT infrastructure, installations could be delayed or cancelled, which would harm our business.
Our products must effectively interoperate with our customers' existing or future IT infrastructure, which often has different specifications, utilizes multiple protocol standards, deploys products from multiple vendors, and contains multiple generations of products that have been added over time. As a result, when problems occur in a network, it may be difficult to identify the sources of these problems. If we find errors in the existing software or defects in the hardware used in our customers' infrastructure or problematic network configurations or settings, we may have to modify our software or hardware so that our products will interoperate with our customers' infrastructure. In such cases, our products may be unable to provide significant numberperformance improvements for applications deployed in our customers' infrastructure. These issues could cause longer installation times for our products and could cause order cancellations, either of our smaller customers could have a material adverse effect on our sales and profitability. A bankruptcy filing by a key customer or customers could also have a material adverse effect onwhich would adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, as a result of the desire of retailers to more closely manage inventory levels, there is a growing trend among retailers to make purchases on a "just-in-time" basis. This requires us to shorten our lead time for production in certain cases and more closely anticipate demand, which could in the future require us to carry additional inventories.
Our business involves the potential for product recalls, product liabilitygovernment and other claims against us, which could affectcustomers may require our earningsproducts to comply with certain security or other certifications and financial condition
As a distributor of contract manufactured consumerstandards. If our products we are subjectlate in achieving or fail to the Consumer Products Safety Act, which empowers the Consumer Products Safety Commission to exclude from the market products that are found to be unsafeachieve compliance with these certifications and standards, or hazardous. Under certain circumstances, the Consumer Products Safety Commission could require us to repurchase or recall one or more of our products. Additionally, laws regulating certain consumer products exist in some citiescompetitors achieve compliance with these certifications and states and more restrictive laws and regulationsstandards, we may be adopted in the future. Any repurchase or recall ofdisqualified from selling our products couldto such customers, or may otherwise be costly to us and could damage our reputation. If we were required to remove, or we voluntarily removed, our products from the market, our reputation could be tarnished and we might have large quantitiesat a competitive disadvantage, either of finished products that we could not sell.
We also face exposure to product liability claims in the event that one of our products is alleged to have resulted in property damage, bodily injury or other adverse effects. Although we maintain product liability insurance in amounts that we believe are reasonable, we cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain such insurance on acceptable terms, if at all, in the future or that product liability claims will not exceed the amount of insurance coverage. Additionally, we do not maintain product recall insurance. As a result, product recalls or product liability claims could have a material adverse effect onwhich would harm our business, results of operations, and financial condition. In addition, we face potential exposure to unusual or significant litigation arising out of alleged defects in our products or otherwise. We spend time and resources
Failure to comply with governmental laws and regulations could harm our business.
Our business is subject to regulation by various U.S. federal, state, local and foreign governments. In certain jurisdictions, these regulatory requirements may be more stringent than those in the United States. Noncompliance with applicable regulations or requirements could subject us to investigations, sanctions, mandatory product recalls, enforcement actions, disgorgement of profits, fines, damages, civil and criminal penalties, or injunctions. If any governmental sanctions are imposed, or if we do not prevail in any possible civil or criminal litigation, our business, results of operations, and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. In addition, responding to any action will likely result in a significant diversion of management's attention and resources and an increase in professional fees. Enforcement actions and sanctions could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our ability to use our net operating losses to offset future taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.
In general, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, a corporation that undergoes an "ownership change" is subject to limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change net operating losses, or NOLs, to offset future taxable income. Our existing NOLs may be subject to limitations arising from previous ownership changes, and if we undergo an ownership change, our ability to utilize NOLs could be further limited by Section 382 of the Code. Future changes in our stock ownership, some of which are outside of our control, could result in an ownership change under Section 382 of the Code. Furthermore, our ability to utilize NOLs of companies that we may acquire in the future may be subject to limitations. There is also a risk that due to regulatory changes, such as suspensions on the use of NOLs, or other applicable standards. However, compliance withunforeseen reasons, our existing NOLs could expire or otherwise be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities. There is also a risk that due to regulatory changes in the tax rates, the value of our NOLs could change substantially. For these standards doesreasons, we may not necessarily prevent individualbe able to utilize a material portion of our NOLs, even if we attain profitability.
Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Ownership of Our Common Stock
The price of our common stock may be volatile, and the value of your investment could decline.
Technology stocks have historically experienced high levels of volatility. The trading price of our common stock following the Reorganization may fluctuate substantially, depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be related to our operating performance. These fluctuations could cause you to lose all or part of your investment in our common stock. Factors that could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock include the following:
| • | announcements of new products, services or technologies, commercial relationships, acquisitions or other events by us or our competitors; |
| |
| • | changes in how customers perceive the effectiveness of our platform in protecting against advanced cyber-attacks or other reputational harm; |
| |
| • | price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time; |
| |
| • | significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of technology companies in general and of companies in the IT security industry in particular; |
| |
| • | fluctuations in the trading volume of our shares or the size of our public float; |
| |
| • | actual or anticipated changes or fluctuations in our results of operations; |
| |
| • | whether our results of operations meet the expectations of securities analysts or investors; |
| |
| • | actual or anticipated changes in the expectations of investors or securities analysts; |
| |
| • | litigation involving us, our industry, or both; |
| |
| • | regulatory developments in the United States, foreign countries or both; |
| |
| • | general economic conditions and trends; |
| |
| • | major catastrophic events; |
| |
| • | sales of large blocks of our common stock; or |
| |
| • | departures of key personnel. |
In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, results of operations or financial condition. The trading price of our common stock might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies in our industry even if these events do not directly affect us. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, securities class action lawsuits, which can entail significant costlitigation has often been brought against that company. If our stock price is volatile, we may become the target of securities litigation. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and risk. We do not maintain insurance against many types of claims involving alleged defects indivert our products that do not involve personal injury or property damage. As a result, these types of claimsmanagement's attention and resources from our business. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The infringement or lossSales of substantial amounts of our proprietary rightscommon stock in the public markets, or the perception that such sales might occur, could have an adverse effect onreduce the price that our businesscommon stock might otherwise attain and may dilute your voting power and your ownership interest in us.
We believemay issue our shares of common stock or securities convertible into our common stock from time to time in connection with a financing, acquisition or otherwise. Any such issuance could result in substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and cause the trading price of our common stock to decline.
Our securities are illiquid meaning that you may not be able to sell your securities when you wish or for a price you like.
Although the Registrant is a publicly traded company, the current market for its securities is limited and relatively illiquid. Therefore, you may incur higher trading costs in the form of wider than typical bid-ask spreads and may have difficulty selling a large block of shares in a short period of time.
Our common stock is currently considered a "penny" stock and therefore is subject to limitations on trading.
Stocks that trade below $5.00 per share and are not listed on a major national securities exchange such as the NYSE or NASDAQ, are subject to restrictions on how broker-dealers may handle such stocks including limitations on solicitation and more onerous record-keeping requirements. As a result, penny stocks tend to have less trading volume and liquidity than stocks which are not subject to penny stock rules. We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We have never declared or paid any dividends on our rights in ownedcommon stock. We intend to retain any earnings to finance the operation and licensed names are a significant partexpansion of our business, and that our ability to create demand for our products is dependent to a large extent on our ability to exploit these trademarks. The breadth or degree of protection that these trademarks afford us may be insufficient, or we may be unable to successfully leverage our trademarksdo not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the future. The costs associated with protectingAs a result, you may only receive a return on your investment in our intellectual property rights, including litigation costs, may be material. We may be unable to successfully assert our intellectual property rights or these rights may be invalidated, circumvented or challenged. Any such inability, particularly with respect tocommon stock if the namesmarket price of our products,common stock increases.
We are an "emerging growth company," and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.
For so long as we remain an "emerging growth company," as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or a successful intellectual property challenge or infringement proceeding against us, could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, because our business strategy is heavily dependent upon the useJOBS Act, we may take advantage of brand names, adverse publicity with respectcertain exemptions from various requirements that are applicable to productspublic companies that are not sold by us, but bear"emerging growth companies," including not being required to comply with the same brand names, couldindependent auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We will remain an "emerging growth company" until the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the completion of this offering, (ii) the last day of the first fiscal year in which our annual gross revenue is $1 billion or more, (iii) the date on which we have, a material adverse effectduring the previous rolling three-year period, issued more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt securities or (iv) the date on us.
Government regulations could adversely impact our operations
Throughout the world, most federal, state, provincial and local authorities require Underwriters Laboratory, Inc. or other safety regulation certification prior to marketing electrical appliances in those jurisdictions. Our electric WonderMill product has such certifications and our WonderMix has UL certification. However, our product may not continue to meet such specifications. Many foreign, federal, state and local governments also have enacted laws and regulations that govern the labeling and packaging of products and limit the sale of products containing certain materialswhich we are deemed to be environmentally sensitive. A determination that we are not in compliance with such rules and regulations could resulta "large accelerated filer" as defined in the imposition of fines or an award of damages to private litigants.Exchange Act. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock, and our stock price may be more volatile and may decline.
We face risks relatedare obligated to implement and maintain proper and effective internal control over financial reporting. We may not complete our analysis of our internal control over financial reporting in a timely manner, or these internal controls may not be determined to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in our company and, as a result, the value of our common stock.
We are required, pursuant to the economic crisisExchange Act, to furnish a report by management on, among other things, the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. This assessment needs to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our internal control over financial reporting.
The credit crisisWe are currently evaluating our internal controls, identifying and related turmoilremediating deficiencies in those internal controls and documenting the global financial system has had and may continue to have an impact on our business and our financial condition. Our ability to generate revenue from salesresults of our WonderMill grain mills depends significantly on discretionary consumer spending. It is difficult to predict new general economic conditions that could impact consumerevaluation, testing and customer demand for our products or our ability to manage normal commercial relationships with our customers, suppliers and creditors. Any significant decrease in discretionary consumer spending could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, our ability to access the capital markets may be severely restricted at a time when we would like or need to do so, which could have an impact on our flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions.
remediation. We may not be able to continue to absorbcomplete our evaluation, testing and any required remediation in a timely fashion. During the costs of being a public company
As aevaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting company under the Exchange Act,that we are requiredunable to file quarterly, annual and current reports withremediate before the SEC, to prepare unaudited interim financial statements and annual audited financial statements, to periodically review our disclosure controls and our control over internal financial accounting, and otherwise to comply with the applicable provisionsend of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andsame fiscal year in which the provisions of Federal and state law applicable to public companies. Our status as a publicly reporting company results in significant additional costs, primarily in the form of legal and accounting fees, that we estimate to range from approximately $40,000 to $70,000 per year, and therematerial weakness is no assurance thatidentified, we will be ableunable to continueassert that our internal controls are effective. If we are unable to absorb the costs of being a publicassert that our internal control over financial reporting companyis effective, or that such costs will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if our stock should ever become listedauditors, when required, are unable to attest to management's report on a national stock exchange, we will incur additional costs in complying with the requirementseffectiveness of such exchange.
We will be required to establish and maintain acceptableour internal controls, relatedwe could lose investor confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which would cause the price of our common stock to financial reporting which will be difficult, time consuming and expensivedecline.
As a public reporting company, we will be required to disclose material changes made in our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting isprocedures on a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Such controls will be reviewed byquarterly basis. However, our independent registered public accounting firm in connection withwill not be required to formally attest to the annual auditeffectiveness of our financial statements. Since we do not have employees with the requisite accounting expertise or experience or an internal audit or accounting group, we will need to rely on consultants and other outside experts to assist us in establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting which is anticipatedpursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until the later of the year following our first annual report required to be expensive. There isfiled with the SEC or the date we are no assurance thatlonger an "emerging growth company" as defined in the JOBS Act, if we will be abletake advantage of the exemptions contained in the JOBS Act. To comply with the requirements of being a public company, we may need to pay the costs of establishingundertake various actions, such as implementing new internal controls and procedures and hiring accounting or that we will be able to establish controls that are free from material weaknesses.internal audit staff
WeIf securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research reports about our business, our share price and trading volume could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will, to some extent, depend on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our officers and the loss of their services would have an adverse effect on our business
We have only two employees, both of whom are officers of the Company. We are dependent on our officers, particularly our president, to operate our business and the loss of such person would have an adverse impact on our operations until such time as he could be replaced, if he could be replaced.business. We do not have employment agreements withany control over these analysts. If one or more of the analysts who cover us should downgrade our officers and we do not carry key man life insurance onshares or change their lives. (See "Management.")
Because we are significantly smaller than the majorityopinion of our competitors,shares, our share price would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases coverage of our company or fails to regularly publish reports on us, we may lack the resources needed to capture market share
The home grain grinding and kitchen mixing businesses are highly competitive and are affected by changes in consumer tastes, as well as national, regional and local economic conditions and demographic trends. Our sales can be affected by changes in consumer tastes and practices, the costs of purchasing fresh ground grain at retail outlets, the popularity of grinding grain at home for health and emergency preparedness reasons, and the type, price and quality of competing grinders and mixers availablecould lose visibility in the marketplace. The home grain grinding and kitchen mixing businesses are extremely competitive with respectfinancial markets, which could cause our share price or trading volume to price, quality, features and durability. We compete with a variety of other manufacturers of home grain grinders and kitchen mixers including national and regional companies with name brand recognition who manufacture more than just a single product or product line. Many of our competitors have been in existence longer and have a more established market presence and substantially greater financial, marketing and other resources than do we. New competitors may emerge and may develop new or innovative grain grinding products that compete with our WonderMill. No assurance can be given that we will be able to continue to compete successfully in the home grain grinding business.decline.
There is currently no active trading market for our stock and there is no assurance that any active or liquid market will developmay be other risks which the Company has not identified which could negatively affect the value of your investment in the future,Company.
While we believe that the risks identified herein are the major risks we face, there are likely other risks which means a purchasercould occur and negatively affect the value of your investment in the company. Therefore, you should only purchase our shares may not besecurities if you are able to resellafford to lose part or all of the shares in the future
There is currently no active trading market for our stock, and there can be no assurance that any active or liquid trading market for our stock will develop in the future. As a result, an investment in our common stock must be considered an "illiquid" investment and a purchaser may not be able to resell the shares acquired by him, her or it in the future. (See "Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchasesvalue of Equity Securities.")
Our stock is subject to special sales practice requirements that could have an adverse impact on any trading market that may develop for our stock
Our stock is subject to special sales practice requirements applicable to "penny stocks" which are imposed on broker-dealers who sell low-priced securities of this type. These rules may be anticipated to affect the ability of broker-dealers to sell our stock, which may in turn be anticipated to have an adverse impact on the market price for our stock if and when a trading market should develop. (See "Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.")
Our officers, directors and principal stockholders own a large percentage of our issued and outstanding shares and other stockholders have little or no ability to elect directors or influence corporate matters
As of April 14, 2017,March 30, 2018, our officers, directors and principal stockholders were deemed to the beneficial owners of over 80%approximately 55% of our issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock, including Series A Preferred Stock and warrants on an "as converted" basis. As a result, such persons will able to determine the outcome of any actions taken by us that require stockholder approval. For example, they will be able to elect all of our directors and control the policies and practices of the Company.Registrant.
We have the ability to issue additional shares of common stock and to issue shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval
The Company is authorized to issue up to 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, 77,610,171 of which have been issued and are outstanding. The Company is also authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, 3,783,818 of which have been issued and 3,639,783 are outstanding, and all of which have been designated as Series A Preferred Stock. To the extent of such authorization, the officers of the Registrant have the ability, without seeking stockholder approval, to issue additional shares of Common Stock in the future for such consideration as they believe to be sufficient. The issuance of additional Common Stock in the future will reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power of the Registrant's current stockholders.
The shares of common stock available for sale in the future could adversely affect the market price for the Company's common stock.
Of the 24,899,33077,610,171 shares of Common Stock outstanding, as of the date of this filing, approximately 5,466,00033,121,000 shares are freely tradable if held by non-affiliates or eligible for resale under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, if held by affiliates. Sales of substantial amounts of this Common Stock in the public market could adversely affect the market price for the Company'sRegistrant's common stock. The approximately 16,325,00044,481,000 remaining shares will become available for sale under Rule 144 around August, 2017within one year if held by non-affiliates, and the availability of those shares for sale could also adversely affect the market price for the Company'sRegistrant's Common Stock. In addition, the Company'sRegistrant's outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock are convertible into shares of the Company'sRegistrant's Common Stock at the rate of 10 shares (subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments) of Common Stock for each one share of Series A Preferred Stock. If the Series A Preferred Stock is converted, and the shares are placed for sale, such sales could adversely affect the market price for the Company'sRegistrant's Common Stock.
We do not anticipate paying dividends in the foreseeable future
We have never paid dividends on our stock. The payment of dividends, if any, on the common stock in the future is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend upon our earnings, if any, capital requirements, financial condition and other relevant factors. The board of directors does not intend to declare any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
Following the effectiveness of the change in our management, we will continue to have only three directors and two of them will not be independent directors, which means our board of directors may be influenced by the concerns, issues or objectives of management to a greater extent than would occur with a number of independent directors
Following the effectiveness of the change in our management, we will continue to have only three directors and two of them will not be independent directors. As a result, our board of directors may be influenced by the concerns, issues or objectives of management to a greater extent than would occur with independent board members. In addition, we do not have the benefit of having persons independent of management review, comment and direct our corporate strategies and objectives and oversee our reporting processes, our disclosure controls and procedures and our internal control over financial reporting.
We have the ability to issue additional shares of common stock and to issue shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval
The Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock. To the extent of such authorization, the officers of the Company have the ability, without seeking stockholder approval, to issue additional shares of common stock in the future for such consideration as they believe to be sufficient. The issuance of additional common stock in the future will reduce the proportionate ownership and voting power of the Company's current stockholders. The Company is also authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, the rights and preferences of which may be designated in series by the board of directors. To the extent of any authorizations, such designations may be made without stockholder approval. The designation and issuance of a series of preferred stock in the future could create additional securities which may have voting, dividend, liquidation preferences or other rights that are superior to those of the common stock, which could effectively deter any takeover attempt of the Company.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
Not Applicable. The Company is a "smaller reporting company."
Item 2. Properties.
BlackRidge's corporate headquarters are located at 10615 Professional Circle, Suite 201,5390 Kietzke Lane, Reno, NV 89521,89511, phone 1-855-807-8776. This office consists of approximately 6,8187,579 square feet of office and laboratory space and is leased from a third party pursuant to a 6462 month lease expiring during April 2020,January 2023, which provides for rent at the initial rate of $15,000.00$16,674 per month plus reimbursement of the landlord's costs for property taxes, insurance and common area maintenance, subject to increase on an annual basis.
BlackRidge also leases an engineering office at the Marist College Hancock Center, 3399 North Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601. This office consists of 200 square feet of office space and is leased from a third party pursuant to a twelve-month operating lease that renews annually. The rent for the facility is a flat monthly amount of $400 and the lease is renewable annually at the option of BlackRidge.
Grote Molen's offices areBlackRidge also leases an engineering office at 322 West Griffith Road, Pocatello, Idaho 83201, where our telephone number100 Century Center Court, Suite 403, San Jose, CA 95112. This office is (208) 234-9352. Our facilities consist of approximately 3,000 square feet of warehouse and office space located inleased from a building owned by Big John's Store LLC, a company owned by John Hofman, the former president, director and principal stockholder of Grote Molen Inc., which is shared with Big John's, a retail store owned by Mr. Hofman. Such space is provided to us under an Idaho Management Agreement with Big John's Store LLCthird party pursuant to a 23 month lease expiring during August 2019, which we payprovides for rent at a flat rate of $12,500$7,988 per month plus reimbursement of the landlord's costs for management servicesproperty taxes, insurance and the use of such space. Such agreement is on a month-to-month basis.common area maintenance.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings.
On December 2, 2016, AltEnergy Cyber, LLC ("Plaintiff") instituted a legal action in Connecticut against the Company and Robert Zahm. The complaint alleged that (i) the company improperly extended the maturity date of the Plaintiff's convertible note in the amount of $1,500,000 and (ii) improperly converted the loan into the Company's stock. The Complaint alleges that the Company is notliable to the Plaintiff for the $4,500,000 plus interest. This litigation is still ongoing. During the year, Robert Zahm was dismissed from the proceedings for lack of personal jurisdiction. On March 29, 2018, the AltEnergy Cyber, LLC's legal action was dismissed through a party to any material legal proceedings, and to our knowledge, no such legal proceedings have been threatened against us.motion for summary judgement.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not Applicable.
Part II
Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
The Company's common stock is on the OTCQB under the symbol "GROT."BRTI."
On April 14,Until July 24, 2017, the Company's common stock had no quoted price on the OTCQB due to the company not currently being traded. The CompanyThere is currently sellinga limited trading market for shares of our common sharesstock. Management does not expect significant active market to develop in privateour common stock unless and until we are able to implement our business plan. No assurance can be given that any active market for our common stock will develop or be maintained.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing quotations, as reported by the OTC Bulletin Board, and represents prices between dealers, does not include retail markups, markdowns or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions:
| | | Closing Bid | |
| | | High | | | Low | |
2016 | | | | | | |
| January 1 – March 31 | | | - | | | | - | |
| April 1 – June 30 | | | - | | | | - | |
| July 1 - September 30 | | | - | | | | - | |
| October 1 – December 31 | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
2017 | | | | | | | | |
| January 1 - March 31 | | | - | | | | - | |
| April 1 – June 30 | | | - | | | | - | |
| July 1- September 30 | | | 4.00 | | | | 0.59 | |
| October 1 – December 31 | | | 0.90 | | | | 0.45 | |
These prices were obtained from the finance portal, Yahoo! Finance, and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions, at a price of $0.45 per share.retail markups, mark downs or commissions.
Holders
At April 14, 2017,March 30, 2018, there were approximately 129 holders160 shareholders of record of the Company's common stock and 7674 holders of the Company's Series A preferred stock, as reported by the Company's transfer agent. In computing the number of holders of record, each broker-dealer and clearing corporation holding shares on behalf of its customers is counted as a single stockholder.
Dividends
No dividends have ever been paid on the Company's securities, and the Company has no current plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.
Equity Compensation Plans
We doIn May 2017, the Company approved the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the "2017 Plan"), which became effective immediately.
Under the 2017 Plan, the term of an option grant shall not have in effect any compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorizedexceed ten years from the date of its grant and options generally vest over a five-year period, with vesting on a monthly interval. Under the 2017 Plan, up to 20,000,000 shares of common stock can be reserved for issuance and we do not have any outstanding stock options.to eligible participants.
Special Sales Practice Requirements with Regard to "Penny Stocks"
In order to protect investors from patterns of fraud and abuse that have occurred in the market for low priced securities commonly referred to as "penny stocks," the SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a "penny stock" to be any equity security having a market price (as defined) less than $5.00 per share, or an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. The price of our stock is currently below $5.00 per share and our stock is subject to the "penny stock" regulations. As a result, broker-dealers selling our common stock are subject to additional sales practices when they sell our stock to persons other than established clients and "accredited investors." For transactions covered by these rules, before the transaction is executed, the broker-dealer must make a special customer suitability determination, receive the purchaser's written consent to the transaction and deliver a risk disclosure document relating to the penny stock market. The broker-dealer must also disclose the commission payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative taking the order, current quotations for the securities and, if applicable, the fact that the broker-dealer is the sole market maker and the broker-dealer's presumed control over the market. Monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks. Such "penny stock" rules may restrict trading in our common stock and may deter broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common stock.
Transfer Agent
Action Stock Transfer Corp., 2469 E. Fort Union Blvd., Suite 214, Salt Lake City, UT 84121, Telephone: (801) 274-1088, serves as the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the period from November 15, 2016 through February 22, 2017, we sold a total of 3,049,330 units, each consisting of one share of Common Stock and one five-year warrant to purchase one share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share, for total proceeds of $304,933.
On February 22, 2017 (the "Closing Date"), the we completed the actions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreement and merged with and into BlackRidge with BlackRidge continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon completion of the Agreement, we issued 3,783,791 shares of our newly designated Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares of Common Stock to the stockholders of BlackRidge in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock and Common Stock of BlackRidge. Additionally, certain stockholders of the Company returned for cancellation a total of 16,284,330 shares of our Common Stock.
Between February 27, 2017 and March 31, 2017, the Company sold an aggregate 6,214,606 shares of Common Stock with 4,660,995 detachable warrants to purchase additional shares of the Company's Common Stock at the price of $0.60 per share to several investors for gross proceeds of $2,796,573 or $0.45 per share.
The Company has authorized 200 million shares of common stock, $0.0001 par value, and 10 million shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value. Each share of the Company's preferred stock is convertible into 10 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment, has voting rights equal to its common stock equivalent, 7% cumulative dividend rights, and has liquidation rights that entitle the recipient to the receipt of net assets on a pro-rata basis. The Company has 77,047,671 and 13,325,681 common shares issued and outstanding and 3,639,783 and 3,671,316 preferred shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
On February 22, 2017, we completed the actions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreement (see note 11 – Business Acquisitions/Dispositions) and merged with and into BlackRidge with BlackRidge continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon completion of the Agreement, the Company issued 3,783,791 shares of its newly designated Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares of common stock to the stockholders of BlackRidge in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock and Common Stock of BlackRidge. Because BlackRidge continues as the surviving entity, the net effect from this transaction on the outstanding stock of the Company was the addition of 8,965,000 shares of common stock held by the investors of the Company at the time of the acquisition.
Between January 13, 2017 and February 27, 2017, the Company issued 62,502 shares of the Company's preferred stock along with 5 year warrants to purchase 625,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.70 to several investors for aggregate proceeds of $375,000, or $0.60 per share. The warrants were valued at $104,765 using the Black-Scholes pricing model.
Between February 27, 2017 and August 29, 2017, the Company issued 10,364,121 shares of the Company's common stock and 5 year warrants to purchase 6,755,291 shares of the Company's common stock at an average exercise price per share of $0.51 to several investors for aggregate proceeds of $4,666,453. The warrants were valued at $1,248,536 using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The Company paid consultant and business development fees of $89,000 related to these issuances.
On February 2, 2017, the Company issued warrants to purchase 166,667 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share in conjunction with a debt agreement. The warrants were valued at $31,002 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded as a discount to the debt agreement.
Between February 9, 2017 and March 6, 2017, the Company issued warrants to purchase 150,001 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.60 to several parties in conjunction with short term notes and advances. The warrants were valued at $27,945 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded to additional paid in capital.
On March 31, 2017, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock in connection with the exercise of a warrant to purchase shares at $0.01 per share. The Company received $10,000 in proceeds for the warrant exercise.
Between August 29, 2017 and November 16, 2017, the Company converted an aggregate 144,035 shares of the Company's preferred stock into 1,568,862 shares of the Company's common stock after receiving conversion exercises from preferred stockholders.
Between August 31, 2017 and September 25, 2017, the Company issued 7,700,000 shares of the Company's common stock and 5 year warrants to purchase 7,700,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.50 to several investors for aggregate proceeds of $3,850,000. The warrants were valued at $1,800,288 using the Black-Scholes pricing model.
On September 11, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate 22,064,105 shares of the Company's common stock to satisfy $13,238,453 in wages payable at a per share price of $0.60. The stock contains a 10 month restriction on transfers and/or sales.
Between September 11, 2017 and September 27, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate 462,740 shares of the Company's common stock as settlement of contracts valued at $231,370 at a per share price of $0.50.
On October 31, 2017, the Company issued 55,556 shares of the Company's common stock in connection with the exercise of a warrant to purchase shares at $0.60 per share. The Company received $33,334 in proceeds for the warrant exercise.
On November 9, 2017, the Company issued 10,757,254 shares of the Company's common stock for the conversion of a note payable and accrued interest totaling $5,378,628. The Company also issued 5 year warrants to purchase an additional 5,378,627 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $0.50. These warrants were valued at $913,238 which was recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt.
On November 9, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate 388,726 shares of the Company's common stock to satisfy $233,235 in accrued accounts payable at a per share price of $0.60. The stock contains a 10 month restriction on transfers and/or sales.
On October 1, 2017, the Company issued 50,000 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $22,500 or $0.45 per share, along with warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $0.60 per share pursuant to a consulting contract.
Between December 1, 2017 and December 17, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate 610,126 shares of the company's common stock valued at $438,500 or an average of $0.72 pursuant to several consulting contracts.
On December 15, 2017, the Company issued 225,000 shares of the Company's common stock and 5 year warrants to purchase 56,250 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.32 to an investor for aggregate proceeds of $90,000. The warrants were valued at $8,365 using the Black-Scholes pricing model.
On January 3, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate 547,000 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $333,670 or $0.61 per share in conjunction with a consulting contracts.
We believe that the foregoing transactions were exempt from the registration requirements under exemption 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended ("the Act"), based on the following facts: there was no general solicitation, there was a limited number of purchasers, each of whom the Registrant believes was an "accredited investor" (within the meaning of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) and was sophisticated about business and financial matters, and all shares issued were subject to restriction on transfer, so as to take reasonable steps to assure that the purchaser was not an underwriter within the meaning of Section 2(11) under the Act.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We have not adopted a stock repurchase plan and we did not purchaserepurchase any shares of our equity securities during our 2017 or 216 fiscal year.years.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
Not Applicable. The Company is a "smaller reporting company."
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
YouThe following discussion should be read the following discussion in conjunction with our financial statements, which are included elsewhere in this report. The following information contains forward-looking statements. (See "Forward-Looking Statements" and "Item 1A. Risk Factors.")
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This report contains forward-looking statements that reflect the Company's views with respect to future events based upon information available to it at this time. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these statements. These uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to the risk factors described in Part I, Item 1A hereof under the caption "Risk Factors." The words "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "expects," "plans," "projects," "targets" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statement was made. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, changes in assumptions, future events or otherwise.
General
BlackRidge Technology International, Inc., formerly known as Grote Molen, Inc. ("Grote Molen", (the "Company") was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 15, 2004. BrownWick, LLC ("BrownWick"), a wholly owned subsidiary, was formed in the State of Idaho on June 5, 2005. The principal business of Grote Molen and BrownWick (collectively the "Company") is to distribute electrical and hand operated grain mills, home kitchen mixers and related accessories for home use.
On February 22, 2017, we completed the actions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreement as described above,We develop and merged with and into BlackRidge with BlackRidge continuing as the surviving corporation. The Reorganization resulted in a change of control of the Company.
On March 31, 2017, we completed the divestiture of substantially all of the assets except for cash associated with the Company's home grain mill and kitchen mixer business to John Hofman and Bruce Crane, former officers and directors of the Company, in consideration for the assumption by such persons of substantially all the liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with such business.
BlackRidge develops and marketsmarket next generation cyber defense solutions that stop cyber-attacks and block unauthenticated access. Our network and server security products are based on our patented Transport Access Control technology and are designed to isolate, cloak and protect servers and cloud services and segment networks for regulatory compliance. BlackRidge products are used in enterprise and government computing environments, the industrial Internet of Things (IoT)("IoT"), and other cloud service provider and network systems.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires our management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements, including the notes thereto, and related disclosures of commitments and contingencies, if any. We consider our critical accounting policies to be those that require the more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation of financial statements, including the following:
Accounts Receivable
Trade accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less an estimate made for doubtful accounts. We determine the allowance for doubtful accounts by identifying potential troubled accounts and by using historical experience and future expectations applied to an aging of accounts. Trade accounts receivable are written off when deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade accounts receivable previously written off are recorded as income when received. We determined that no allowance for doubtful accounts was required at December 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015.2016.
InventoriesInventory
Inventories, consisting primarily of grain mills, kitchen mixers, parts and accessories, areInventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using primarily the first-in-first-out (FIFO)average cost method. We purchase substantially all inventories from two foreign suppliers, and have been dependent on those suppliers for substantially all inventory purchases since we commenced operations.
DepositsPrepaid Expenses
Generally, we are requiredPrepaid expenses consist mainly of payments to payvendors made in advance and deposits towardheld on account for the purchase of inventories from our principal suppliers. Such advance payments are recorded as deposits, a current asset in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.Company.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are carriedstated at cost less accumulated depreciation.depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is computed using theon a straight-line method based onbasis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows: office equipment – 3 to 5 years; warehouse equipment – 5 to 10 years; website development – 3 years; and molds – 10 years. or, in the case of leasehold improvements, the remaining lease term, if shorter. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the costassets and related accumulated depreciation are removed, and anythe resulting gaingains or loss is recognizedlosses are recorded as part of other income or expense in operations for the period. The coststatements of operations. Repairs and maintenance and repairs is charged to operationscosts are expensed as incurred. Significant renewals and betterments are capitalized.
The estimated useful lives of the property and equipment are as follows:
Property and Equipment | Estimated Useful Life |
| Building improvements | 15 years |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 7 years |
| Computer equipment | 5 years |
Intangible Assets
IntangibleAcquired intangible assets are recorded at cost, lessestimated fair value, net of accumulated amortization. Amortization of definitive lived intangible assets is computed using the straight-line method based on theCosts incurred in obtaining certain patents and intellectual property as well as software development expenses, are capitalized and amortized over their related estimated useful lives, or contractual lives ofusing a straight-line basis consistent with the assets, which range from 10 to 30 years.
Our indefinite lived intangible asset includes the cost to acquire from a German manufacturer in 2012 the license to produce a 110-volt mixer. The license agreement stipulates that as long as the Company meets the terms of the agreement, the Company will have an exclusive licenseunderlying expected future cash flows related to the mixer indefinitely. No specific legalintangible asset. Costs to renew or extend the life or term toof intangible assets are capitalized and amortized over the license is otherwise stated in the agreement. We have concluded that no legal, regulatory, contractual, competitive, economic, or other factors limit theremaining useful life of thisthe asset. Amortization expenses are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company's continued ability to extend and/or renew the rights associated with these intangible asset. We thereforeassets may have classified the license as indefinite, and are not amortizing its carrying value.an impact on future cash flows.
Useful life estimates for the Company's significant intangible asset classes are as follows:
| Useful Life |
| Patent Costs | 20 years |
| Software Licenses | 7 years |
| Software Development Costs | 15 years |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
We periodically review ourThe Company reviews long-lived assets, including intangibleat least annually, to determine if impairment has occurred and whether the economic benefit of the asset (fair value of assets to be used and fair value less disposal cost for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate thatassets to be disposed of) is expected to be less than the carrying value. Triggering events, which signal further analysis, consist of a significant decrease in the asset's market value, a substantial change in the use of an asset, a significant physical change in the asset, a significant change in the legal or business climate that could affect the asset, an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to acquire or construct the asset, or a history of losses that imply continued loss associated with assets used to generate revenue.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Revenue generally is recognized net of allowances for returns and any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.
Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the fair value for each of the elements.
The Company may enter into arrangements that can include various combinations of software, services, and hardware. Where elements are delivered over different periods of time, and when allowed under U.S. GAAP, revenue is allocated to the respective elements based on their relative selling prices at the inception of the arrangement, and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. We use a hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value ("VSOE"), (ii) third-party evidence, and (iii) best estimate of selling price ("ESP"). For software elements, we follow the industry specific software guidance which only allows for the use of VSOE in establishing fair value. Generally, VSOE is the price charged when the deliverable is sold separately or the price established by management for a product that is not be recoverable. No events or changes in circumstances have occurred to indicateyet sold if it is probable that the carrying amountprice will not change before introduction into the marketplace. ESPs are established as best estimates of our long-lived assetswhat the selling prices would be if the deliverables were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. Our process for determining ESPs requires judgment and considers multiple factors that may not be recoverable. Therefore, no impairment loss was recognized duringvary over time depending upon the years ended December 31, 2016unique facts and 2015.circumstances related to each deliverable.
Revenue RecognitionAny revenue received that does not yet meet the above recognition standards is recorded to unearned revenue, and held as a liability until recognition occurs.
We record revenue from the sales of grain mills, kitchen mixers and accessories in accordance with the underlying sales agreements when the products are shipped, the selling price is fixed and determinable, and collection is reasonably assured.
Warranties
We provide limited warranties to our customers for certain of our products sold. We perform warranty work at our service center in Pocatello, Idaho or at other authorized service locations. Warranty expenses have not been material to our consolidated financial statements.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification™ ("ASC") Topic 730, Research and Development. The costs of materials and other costs acquired for research and development activities are charged to expense as incurred. Salaries, wages, and other related costs of personnel, as well as other facility operating costs are allocated to research and development expense through management's estimate of the percentage of time spent by personnel in research and development activities. We had no material research and development costs for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Foreign Currency Transactions
All transactions with our foreign suppliers and customers are delineated in United States Dollars. Therefore, there are no effects of foreign currency transactions and translations in our consolidated financial statements.
Income Taxes
We account for income taxes in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, requires us to determine whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination based upon the technical merits of the position. If the more-likely-than-not threshold is met, we must measure the tax position to determine the amount to recognize in our consolidated financial statements. We performed a review of our material tax positions in accordance with recognition and measurement standards established by ASC Topic 740 and concluded we had no unrecognized tax benefit that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized for the yearsnine months ended December 31, 2016September 30, 2017 and 2015.2016.
We include interest and penalties arising from the underpayment of income taxes, if any, in our consolidated statements of operations in general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015,2017 and 2016, we had no accrued interest or penalties related to uncertain tax positions.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
OurThe Company's financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, notes payable and notes payable.convertible debt. The carrying amount of cash, accounts receivable and accounts payablethese financial instruments approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these items. The carrying amount of the notes payable approximates fair value because the interest rates on the notes approximate market rates of interest.
Results of Operations
Sales
Our business is not seasonal; however, our quarterlyTotal sales including sales to related parties, may fluctuate materially from period to period. At times we derive a significant portion of our revenues from sales to related parties. Each of our two principal stockholders own companies that are significant customers. Our sales forduring the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 20152017 were comprised of the following:
| | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| | | | | | | |
| Sales | | $ | 962,782 | | | $ | 1,466,128 | |
| Sales to related parties | | | 43,664 | | | | 81,062 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total sales | | $ | 1,006,446 | | | $ | 1,527,190 | |
Sales$81,968, as compared to related parties represented approximately 4% and 5% totalnet sales for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Our total sales decreased by $520,744, or approximately 34%, during the year ended December 31, 2016 comparedof $84,023. Management believes historical sales to the year ended December 31, 2015.not be indicative of future expectations due to historically limited business operations. We believe there continues to be an overall slow-down in the preparedness market and continued slow economic recovery in the United States. We completed the development of the molds and the design process during the fourth quarter of 2014, and received our first shipments of the new grain mills. We believethat future sales of the Wondermix will continue to increase in; however, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in these endeavors.significantly increased as we market our new suite of products.
Cost of SalesGoods Sold
Total costCost of salesgoods sold for the year ended December 31, 2016 was 744,831,2017 were $10,260 as compared to $1,111,422 fornone during the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of $366,591, or approximately 13%. Our cost of sales consists of the purchase price of our products incurred2016. This increase was due to our suppliers, plus inbound shipping costs. We do not manufacture our own products. Our costs to purchase products for resale remained relatively constant during 2016. Therefore, the decrease in our cost of sales during 2016 was primarily attributed to the decreasean increase in sales volume compared to 2015. Includedcontaining hardware in costthe current year whereas all sales comprised of sales were cost of related party sales of $32,314 and $58,933 forsoftware only in the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Total cost of sales as a percentage of total sales was approximately 74% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to approximately 73% for the year ended December 31, 2015.prior year.
Cost of sales as a percentage of sales may fluctuate from period to period, based on the mix of products sold during a particular period and pricing arrangements with our suppliers. In addition, we purchase substantially all inventories from two foreign suppliers, and have been dependent on those suppliers for substantially all inventory purchases since we commenced operations. International manufacturing is subject to factors that can have a material impact on our costs of sales, including: availability of labor at costs consistent with historical levels; changes in labor or other laws; instability of social, political and economic factors; freight costs, including domestic and international customs and tariffs; unexpected changes in regulatory environments; costs and availability of manufacturing materials; and other factors.
Selling, General and AdministrativeOperating Expenses
Our selling, general and administrative expenses were $319,973$13,323,460 for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $5,235,260 for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $304,095 for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of $15,878,$8,088,200, or approximately 5%154%.
Management Fees to Related Parties
Pursuant to an agreement effective The increase in February 2011, we pay a monthly management fee to a company owned by one of the major stockholders of the Company to manage our day-to-day business activitiesselling, general and to provide business space. Historically we have paid monthly management fees in varying amounts to this related party pursuant to prior agreements. The agreement is on a month-to-month basis and can be cancelled at any time by the vote of management. The agreement was amended and restated on October 31, 2014 to increase the monthly fee from $10,700 to $12,500 effective November 1, 2014. Also included in management fees are monthly payments of $150 to another major stockholder of the Company for expense reimbursement. Management fees to related parties totaled $151,800 and for both years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
Depreciation and amortization expense remained relatively flat at $17,081 and $18,016 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development activities are not currently significant to our business. We did not incur material research and developmentadministrative expenses in the years ended December 31, 2016current year is primarily attributable to an approximate $267,000 increase in engineering expense related to new product testing, a $3,176,000 increase in professional fees (consists primarily of 7$05,000 in market development expense, $950,000 in capital consultant expense, 300,000 in investor relations expense, $200,000 in accounting and 2015.finance expense, 100,000 in legal expense and $692,000 in non-cash expense), a $1,967,000 increase in wages and salaries, an increase of approximately $1,100,000 in onetime, non-cash stock compensation accruals and an increase of $238,000 in depreciation and amortization. The increase in salaries and wages, and professional fees is mainly due to increased business activity as we ramp up operations and build our sales capability. We expect that much of the increase in professional fees as well as the stock compensation expenses will not continue in future periods.
Other ExpenseInterest Income (Expense)
Other expense includes interest expense on our indebtedness, a significant portion of which is indebtedness to related parties. Total net interest expense – related parties was $18,051$686,990 and $10,628$2,064,788 for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The increasedecrease in interest expense to related parties is due to additional short term borrowings from related partiesof $1,377,798 in the current year. Total interest expenseyear is attributable primarily to non-related parties was $16,197 and $15,009 for the yearsconversion of approximately $14 million of convertible debt into equity in the prior year.
Loss on extinguishment of debt
During the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase in interest expense to non-related parties is2017, the company renegotiated the conversion terms of a convertible note due to the refinancingCompany's Chief Technology Officer and significant shareholder. The Company converted the note principal of $3,712,637and accrued interest of $1,665,991 into 10,757,254 shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion rate of $0.50 per share. The Company also issued a 5 year warrant to purchase an additional 5,378,627 shares of the Company s common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share as further consideration for this conversion. The Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt related to this transaction of $913,238.
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations
On March 31, 2017, the Company completed the sale of substantially all the assets, other than cash, used in or connection with the current year.Company's home grain mill and kitchen mixer business to John Hofman and Bruce Crane, former officers and directors of the Company, in consideration for the assumption by such persons of substantially all the liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with such business. The assets divested consisted of the non-cybersecurity assets of the Company and included accounts receivable, inventory, deposits, property and equipment and intangible assets. The liabilities divested included the non-cybersecurity liabilities of the Company and included accounts payable and accrued expenses and long and short-term notes payable and accrued interest thereon. Upon completion of the divestiture, the Company recognized a $484,927 non-cash loss on disposal.
Loss from discontinued operations
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recognized a loss from discontinued operations of $8,737. This loss was primarily driven by lower than anticipated product sales of the entity that was eventually sold.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As ofAt December, 31, 2016,2017, we had total current assets of $1,261,598,$1,041,299, including cash of $111,565,$421,869, and current liabilities of $785,712,$6,119,655, resulting in working capital deficit of $475,886.$5,078,356. Our current assets and working capital included inventoriesinclude receivables of $1,061,558$217,380, inventory of $40,408 and depositsprepaid expenses of $50,000. Generally, we are required to pay significant advance deposits toward the purchase of inventories from our principal suppliers.$361,642.
In addition, as of December 31, 2016,2017, we had total stockholders' equity of $520,320. We$1,568,354. As we have worked toward our new product launches, we have primarily financed ourrecent operations, the acquisitiondevelopment of inventories,technologies, and the payment of vendor deposits from our operations, short-term loans from our principal stockholders and non-related parties, a long-term note payable from a bank, and fromexpenses through the issuance of our debt, common stock.stock, preferred stock and warrants.
For the year ended December 31, 2016,2017, net cash used in operating activities was $244,345,$7,748,606, as a result of our net loss from continued operations of $259,447,$15,345,644 and increases in inventoriesaccounts receivable of $352,665205,380, inventory of $40,408, prepaid expenses of $260,688, and decreases in deferred revenue of $11,228, accounts payable and accrued interest payableexpenses – related party of $11,267, and accrued interest payable of $2,748,$564,665, partially offset by decreases in accounts receivable of $1,560, deposits of $14,685,non-cash expenses totaling $2,248,894, and increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $338,821,$833,372, accrued interest of $6,657, accrued interest - related party of $601,145, wages payable – related parties of $12,300.$447,647, loss from discontinued operation of $493,664 and cash flows from discontinued operations of $45,028.
By comparison,Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash used2017 was $1,425,276 compared to $1,056,370 for the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase of 368,906 in operating activities was $30,209, as a result of our net loss of $52,120 and increasesthe current period is due primarily to an increase in inventories of $380,733, partially offset by non-cash expenses of $18,016, decreases in accounts receivable of $17,652, accounts receivable –capitalized engineering costs related parties of $1,776, deposits of $317,610 and prepaid expenses of $6,579, and increases in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $23,949, accrued interest payable – related parties of $8,571 and accrued interest payable of $8,491.to the Company's technology development.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, we had net provided by investing activities of $3,710, comprised of the purchase of property and equipment, as compared to2017, net cash provided by investingfinancing activities was $9,538,718, comprised of $0, forproceeds from the year ended December 31, 2015.sale of common stock of $8,482,450, preferred stock of $275,000 and warrants exercised of $43,334, proceeds from short term convertible notes of $1,250,000 and advances – related party of $115,000, partially offset by the repayment of short-term notes of $38,989, repayments of short-term convertible notes of $100,000, repayments of long-term notes of $433,342 and cash outflows from discontinued operations of $54,735.
For the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by financing activities was $342,949,$3,266,004, comprised of Proceeds from notes payable – related party of $300,000, proceeds from long-term debt of $5,300, proceeds from notes payable of $94,500 and proceeds from issuance of common stock of $269,932, partially offset by repayment of notes payable – related parties of $250,248, repayment of long-term debt – related party of $2,493, repayment of long-term note payable of $59,600 and repayment of Long-term debt of $10,992.
For the year ended December 31, 2015, net cash used in financing activities was $21,348, comprised of repayment of notes payable – related parties of $24,500, repayment of long-term debt – related party of $49,734 and repayment of long-term note payable of $20,314, partially offset by proceeds from long-term note payable of $28,700 and proceeds from notes payable of $44,500.
At December 31, 2016, we had short-term notes payable – related parties totaling $179,879, which are payable to our principal stockholders, are unsecured, bear interest at rates ranging from 6% to 18% per annum and are generally due on demand. In addition, at December 31, 2016, we had short-term notes payable to non-related parties totaling $118,000, which are unsecured, bear interest at rates ranging from 6% to 8% per annum and are due on demand.
At December 31, 2016, we had a long-term note payable to a bank with a principal balance of $139,603. The long-term note payable is a line of credit promissory note bearing interest at an indexed rate plus 2% (4.75% at December 31, 2015), requiring monthly interest payments only and maturing on May 16, 2021. The note payable has an available line of credit of $150,000 and is secured by a deed of trust on certain real estate owned by one of the principal stockholders of the Company and by the Company's inventories, property and equipment, and intangible assets.
Accrued interest payable – related parties was $42,240 and $53,507 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accrued interest payable to non-related parties was $19,502 and $22,686 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In the event sales during 2017 do not meet our expectations, we may require additional funding from the sale of preferred stock of $3,131,004 and proceeds from subscriptions payable of $135,000.
Based on our common stockcurrent business plan, we anticipate that our operating activities will use approximately $500,000 in cash per month over the next twelve months, or debt in$6 million. Currently we do not have enough cash on hand to fully implement our business plan, and will require additional funds within the next year. We believe that our operations will not begin to generate significant cash flows until the second quarter of 2018 when we expect to begin new product contracts.
In order to meet our obligations. Depending onremedy this liquidity deficiency, we are actively seeking to raise additional funds through the requirementsale of equity and debt securities, and ultimately plan to pay advance deposits on ordersgenerate substantial positive operating cash flows. Our internal sources of funds will consist of cash flows from our suppliers,operations, but not until we estimatebegin to realize substantial revenues from sales. In December 2017, we entered into a term sheet for a private placement of up to $7 million to fund continuing operations. If we are unable to raise additional funds in the near term, we may require $50,000not be able to $100,000 of additional funding in 2017. No assurances can be givenfully implement our business plan, and it is unlikely that if required, such fundingwe will be availableable to us on acceptable terms or at all.continue as a going concern.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company has implemented allFrom time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB that are in effectadopted by the Company as of the datespecified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the issuance of theseCompany's financial statements. The following pronouncements will significantly impact future reporting of financial positon and results of operations. Management is currently assessing implementation.statements upon adoption.
The FASB hasDuring August 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying("ASU") 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows - Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the Definitionobjective of a Business, clarifyingreducing the definitionexisting diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of a business.cash flows. The amendments affect all companies and other reporting organizations that must determine whether they have acquired or sold a business.
For public companies, the amendments arestandard is effective for annual periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods.fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this new pronouncement on the Company's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
TheIn February 2016, the FASB has issued its new lease accountingASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes Topic 840, Leases ("ASU 2016-02"). The guidance in Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).
Underthis new standard requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses on their income statements in a manner similar to the new guidance, lessees will be required to recognizecurrent accounting and eliminates the followingcurrent real estate-specific provisions for all entities. The guidance also modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date:
· | A lease liability, which is a lessee's obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and |
· | A right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee's right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. |
· | Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. |
· | The new lease guidance simplified the accounting for sale and leaseback transactions primarily because lessees must recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Lessees will no longer be provided with a source of off-balance sheet financing. |
Public business entities should apply the amendments infor lessors. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, includingand interim periods within those fiscal years, (i.e., January 1, 2019, for a calendar year entity). with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02.
TheIn May 2014, in addition to several amendments issued during 2016, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments are intended to improve2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." This pronouncement updated the accounting guidance related to revenue from contracts with customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for employee share-based paymentsthose goods or services. The standard defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, affect all organizations that issue share-based payment awards to their employees.
Several aspects ofin doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the accounting for share-based payment award transactionsrevenue recognition process than are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows.
Forrequired under existing U.S. GAAP. In accordance with allowed public companies, the amendmentscompany guidelines, these updates are effective for the Company for its annual periods beginning afterperiod ending December 15, 2016,2017 and after, and interim periods within those annual periods. For private companies,fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the amendments areConsolidated Financial Statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) ("ASU 2016-08") which clarified the revenue recognition implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for any organization in any interim or annual period.
Theduring the same period as ASU 2014-09. In April 2016, the FASB has issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The amendments clarifyLicensing ("ASU 2016-10") which clarified the following two aspectsrevenue recognition guidance regarding the identification of Topic 606: (a) identifying performance obligations;obligations and (b) the licensing implementation guidance. The amendmentsand is effective during the same period as ASU 2014-09. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients ("ASU 2016-12") which narrowly amended the revenue recognition guidance regarding collectability, noncash consideration, presentation of sales tax and transition. ASU 2016-12 is effective during the same period as ASU 2014-09. Based on our preliminary assessment, we do not changeexpect the core principlenew standard to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of the guidance in Topic 606.operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718) ("ASU 2016-09"). The standard identifies areas for simplification involving several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, an option to recognize gross stock compensation expense with actual forfeitures recognized as they occur, as well as certain classifications on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory ("ASU 2015-11"), which simplifies the subsequent measurement of inventory by requiring inventory to be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling price of inventory in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal and transportation. ASU 2015-11 was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In July 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments ("ASU 2016-13"), which among other things, these amendments require the measurement of all expected credit losses of financial assets held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions, and transition requirementsreasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform their credit loss estimates. In addition, the ASU amends the accounting for the amendments are the same as thecredit losses on available-for-sale debt securities and purchased financial assets with credit deterioration. ASU 2016-13 is effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606. Public entities should apply the amendments for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including2019, and interim reporting periods therein (i.e., January 1, 2018, for a calendar year entity). Early application for public entities is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period.those fiscal years. The effective date for nonpublic entitiesCompany is deferred by one year.in the process of evaluating the impact of the pronouncement.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Pursuant to an agreement effective in February 2011, we pay a monthly management fee to a company owned by one of the major stockholders of the Company to manage the day-to-day business activities of the Company and provide business space. Historically we have paid monthly management fees in varying amounts to this related party pursuant to prior agreements approved by the stockholders of the Company. The agreement is on a month-to-month basis and can be cancelled at any time by the vote of management. On October 31, 2014, the agreement was amended and restated to increase the monthly fee from $10,700 to $12,500 effective November 1, 2014.None.
We also pay another major stockholder of the Company at the rate of $150 per month for expense reimbursement.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Not Applicable. The Company is a "smaller reporting company."
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The following financial statements are being filed with this report and are located immediately following the signature page.TABLE OF CONTENTS
| PAGE |
| |
| Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm | F - 2 |
| |
| Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 | F - 4 |
| |
| Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 | F - 5 |
| |
| Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 | F - 6 |
| |
| Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 | F - 7 |
| |
| Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements | F - 8 |
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2016
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Audited Financial Statements of BlackRidge Technology Holdings, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for the years then ended.
Pro forma financial information
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.On January 29, 2018, Pritchett, Siler and Hardy P.C. ("PSH") resigned as the independent registered public accounting firm for Blackridge Technology International, Inc., following PSH's acquisition by Haynie & Company, CPA ("Haynie & Company"). On January 29, 2018, the Company engaged Haynie & Company, Salt Lake City, Utah, as its new independent registered public accounting firm. The change of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm from PSH to Haynie & Company was approved unanimously by the Company's board of directors.
The reports of PSH on the Company's financial statements for the two most recent fiscal years did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principles.
During the two most recent fiscal years and through the Resignation Date, there were (i) no disagreements between the Company and PSH on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedures, which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of PSH, would have caused PSH to make reference thereto in their reports on the consolidated financial statements for such years, and (ii) no reportable events as that term is defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("the Exchange Act") as of December 31, 2016,September 30, 2017, the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, we have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 20162017 were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Our internal control system is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and board of directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officerCEO and principal financial officer,CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the COSO framework (1992), an integrated framework for the evaluation of internal controls issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.reporting. Based on our evaluation under that framework, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.2017.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 20162017 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table indicates the name, age, term of office and position held by each of our officers and directors. The term of office for each officer position is for one year or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified by the board of directors. The term of office for a director is for one year or until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified by the stockholders.
| Name | Age | Titles |
| Directors and Officers | | |
| Robert Graham | 6768 | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President |
| John Bluher | 5859 | Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary |
| John Hayes | 4950 | Chief Technology Officer and Director |
| Robert Lentz | 65 | Director |
| Thomas Bruderman | 48 | Director |
| J. Allen Kosowsky | 69 | Director |
| Robert Zahm | 55 | Director |
Certain biographical information for the Company's directors and officers is set forth below.
Robert Graham is a co-founder of BlackRidge and has served as its Chairman and CEO since its inception. Mr. Graham is a seasoned executive with broad business and entrepreneurial experience in the technology and services industry, from Fortune 500 firms to start-ups. He has an extensive background in venture capital, engineering, marketing, sales, and operations, along with living and working in non-English speaking environments, including Asia, Europe, and the Americas. Mr. Graham also worked as a technology analyst on the subjects of storage, networking, servers, and services.
John Hayes is a co-founder of BlackRidge and has served as its Chief Technology Officer since its inception. Mr. Hayes is a technology entrepreneur who specializes in cyber security, networking, I/O interface design, storage architecture, and communications protocols. He has a proven track record of bringing concepts to market and is able to clearly communicate complex ideas to diverse audiences. Mr. Hayes is skilled at finding creative solutions for technology and business challenges
John Bluher is the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Secretary of BlackRidge. Mr. Bluher an attorney and specialist in financial management and operating growing early stage companies. He specializes in capital management, capitalization, structuring mergers and acquisitions, and valuations of public and private companies. Mr. Bluher has significant operating experience managing finance and budgeting and capital allocation models. He has 20 years of experience working or managing multiple departments in public companies and corporate governance. His experience also includes negotiating transactions and purchases, sales of assets and properties, creating value for growth companies and implementing corporate governance plans
Robert Lentz is a Director of BlackRidge and currently the President and CEO of Cyber Security Strategies. Mr. Lentz was the first Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for cyber and identity security, in which from November 2007 to October 2009, he led the DoD's transformation to Network Centric Operations including the establishment of US Cyber Command. Since November 2000, he served as the CISO for the Secretary of Defense overseeing global security post 9-11. He previously worked at the NSA from 1975 to 2000, where he served in the first National Computer Security Center and as Chief of Network Security. Mr. Lentz serves on the board of directors of multiple high tech companies, advisor to the University of Maryland University College and on the nominating committee to the Cyber Hall of Fame. Robert holds a BA from St. Mary's College and an MS in national strategy from National Defense University, and attended Harvard Business School.
Thomas Bruderman is the founder and Managing Partner of two alternative asset strategies, VP Theta Management, a public equity hedge fund and MAG Ventures, an early to mid-stage venture fund. Mr. Bruderman has over 25 years of experience in finance and asset management, including his experience as Senior Equity Trader responsible for the healthcare group at Fidelity Investments, and Managing Director of Equity Securities at Merit Capital, a Connecticut-based boutique Investment Bank. Mr. Bruderman serves on the Board of Powercast, Champion Technology Company, Flyp, and Battlefin, and he is a board observer and advisor to Acacia Research Corporation and PNA Innovations. Mr. Bruderman holds a BS in finance from Providence College.
Mr. Bruderman has extensive financial management and board experience with technology companies which will make him an asset to our board in setting strategy and managing our financial and industry growth plans.
J. Allen Kosowsky, CPA, is a certified public accountant who since 1985 has conducted business through his own advisory firm. The firm provides services that include business and intellectual property valuations, forensic accounting and financial analysis, and alternative dispute resolutions. From January of 2003 to February of 2010, Mr. Kosowsky served as the Chairman of the Board and Chairman of the audit committee for ON2 Technologies Inc., a U.S. based video compression software company, which was acquired by Google. On September 17, 2016, Mr. Kosowsky became a National Association of Corporate Directors Fellow.
Mr. Kosowsky has extensive accounting experience and financial expertise and training, which qualifies him as an "audit committee financial expert" and makes him a significant asset to our board and Company
Robert Zahm spent the first 23 years of his professional career with Accenture as a management and technology consultant. Since 2010, he has worked as an independent consultant at Whiz Bang Consulting, where he applies his core areas of expertise in large scale system architecture, high performance computing, capital markets trading and clearing systems, and technology organization optimization. Mr. Zahm graduated from the University of Michigan with a BS in Computer Engineering, from Lehigh with an MS in Computer Science, and from the University of Pittsburgh with an MBA in Accounting.
Mr. Zahm has deep expertise in IT, corporate strategy and management and in the Financial Services market that will be an asset to our board and Company as we develop and expand our enterprise go to market strategies.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen to become directors or executive officers.
Board of Directors
Our board of directors consists of threesix persons, Robert Graham, John Hayes, Robert Lentz, Thomas Bruderman, J. Allen Kosowsky and Robert Lentz.Zahm. Messrs. Graham and Hayes are not "independent" within the meaning of Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace because they are officers and employees of the Company. Mr.Messrs. Lentz, isBruderman, Kosowsky and Zahm are considered independent.
Our boardAudit Committee consists of directors has not appointed any standingfour persons, J. Allen Kosowsky (serving as chair), Robert Zahm, Robert Lentz and Thomas Bruderman. J. Allen Kosowsky holds a CPA license and serves as the committees there is no separately designated audit committee and the entire board of directors acts as our audit committee. The board of directors does not have an independent "financial expert" because it does not believe the scope of the Company's activitiesin addition to date has justified the expenses involved in obtaining such a financial expert. In addition, our securities are not listed on a national exchange and we are not subject to the special corporate governance requirements of any such exchange.being its chair.
The Company does not have a compensation committeeOur Compensation Committee consists of three persons, Thomas Bruderman (serving as chair), J. Allen Kosowsky and the entire board participates in the consideration of executive officer and director compensation. The Company's president and chief technical officer are also members of the Company's board of directors and they participate in determining the amount and form of executive and director compensation. To date, the Company has not engaged independent compensation consultants to determine or recommend the amount or form of executive or director compensation.Robert Zahm.
The Company does not have a standing nominating committeeOur Nominating and the Company's entire boardCorporate Governance Committee consists of directors performs the functions that would customarily be performed by a nominating committee. The board of directors does not believe a separate nominating committee is required at this time due to the limited size of the Company's business operationsthree persons, Robert Zahm (serving as chair), J. Allen Kosowsky and the limited resources of the Company which do not permit it to compensate its directors. The board of directors has not established policies with regard to the consideration of director candidates recommended by security holders or the minimum qualifications of such candidates.
It is anticipated that the board of directors will appoint standing audit, nominating and corporate governance and compensation committees during the first quarter of 2017.Robert Lentz.
Code of Ethics
We have not previously adopted a Code of Ethics due to the small number of officers and employees and the size of the Company's operations. It is anticipated that the new board of directors will adopt a Code of Ethics that applies to all of the Company's directors and executive officers serving in any capacity, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions.
37
Director Meetings and Stockholder Meeting Attendance
The Board of Directors held no formal meetings during 2016 and the directors took action by written consents in lieu of meetings. The Company's policy is to encourage, but not require, members of the Board of Directors to attend annual stockholder meetings. The Company did not hold an annual stockholders' meeting during 2016.
Communications with Directors
Shareholders may communicate with the Board of Directors or any individual director by sending written communications addressed to the Board of Directors, or any individual director, to: Grote Molen,BlackRidge Technology International, Inc., Attention: Corporate Secretary, 322 West Griffith Road, Pocatello, Idaho 83201.5390 Kietzke Lane, Reno, NV 89511. All communications will be compiled by the corporate secretary and forwarded to the Board of Directors or any individual director, as appropriate. In order to facilitate a response to any such communication, the Company's Board of Directors suggests, but does not require, that any such submission include the name and contact information of the shareholder submitting the communication.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than 10 percent of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the SEC. Officers, directors, and greater than ten percent shareholders also are required by rules promulgated by the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to us, we believe that all Section 16(a) filing requirements were timely met during 2016.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The following table sets forth certain information regarding the annual compensation paid to our principal executive officer and our vice president in all capacities for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014.2015. No other person served as an executive officer of the Company or received total annual compensation from the Company in excess of $100,000.
Summary Compensation Table
| Name and principal position | Year | | Salary | | | | Bonus | | | Equity Compensation | | | All other compensation | | | | Total | | Year | | Salary | | | Bonus | | | Equity Compensation | | | All other compensation | | | Total | |
| Robert Graham, CEO and President | 2016 | | $ | 225,000 | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | $ | 225,000 | | 2017 | | $ | 225,000 | | | $ | 100,000 | (1) | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 325,000 | |
| | 2015 | | | 225,000 | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | $ | 225,000 | | 2016 | | $ | 225,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 225,000 | |
| | 2014 | | | 200,000 | | (1) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | $ | 200,000 | | 2015 | | $ | 225,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 225,000 | |
| John Hayes, CTO | 2016 | | $ | 180,000 | | (2) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | 180,000 | | 2017 | | $ | 180,000 | (2) | | $ | 100,000 | (3) | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 280,000 | |
| | 2015 | | $ | 180,000 | | (2) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | - | | 2016 | | $ | 180,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 180,000 | |
| | 2014 | | $ | 180,000 | | (3) | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | - | | 2015 | | $ | 180,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| John Bluher, CFO | 2016 | | $ | 13,867 | | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 108,000 | | (4) | | $ | 121.867 | | 2017 | | $ | 275,000 | | | $ | 38,280 | (4) | | $ | 900,000 | (5) | | $ | 30,000 | (6) | | $ | 1,243,280 | |
| | 2015 | | | - | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | - | | 2016 | | $ | 13,867 | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 108,000 | (7) | | $ | 121,867 | |
| | 2014 | | | - | | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | | - | | 2015 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| John B. Hoffman, Former President (5) | 2016 | | | - | | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 171,573 | | | | $ | 171,573 | | |
| John B. Hofman, Former President(8) | | 2017 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | 2015 | | | - | | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 174,695 | | | | $ | 174,695 | | 2016 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 171,573 | | | $ | 171,573 | |
| | 2014 | | $ | 600 | | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 156,005 | | | | $ | 156,605 | | 2015 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 174,695 | | | $ | 174,695 | |
Bruce P. Crand, Former Vice President (6) | 2016 | | | - | | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 6,114 | | | | $ | 6,114 | | |
| Bruce P. Crane, Former Vice President(9) | | 2017 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | 2015 | | | - | | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 5,076 | | | | $ | 5,076 | | 2016 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 6,114 | | | $ | 6,114 | |
| | 2014 | | $ | 600 | | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 8,673 | | | | $ | 9,273 | | 2015 | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | $ | 5,076 | | | $ | 5,076 | |
(1) | $169,927Payment of Mr. Graham's 2014 salary2017 bonus has been deferred as of this filing |
(2) | $146,72073,360 of Mr. Hayes' 2016 and 20152017 salary has been deferred as of this filing |
(3) | $146,927Payment of Mr. Hayes' 2014 salary2017 bonus has been deferred as of this filing |
(4) | Represents performance bonuses paid to Mr. Bluher |
(5) | Represents 1,500,000 shares of restricted common stock granted to Mr. Bluher |
(6) | Represents a car allowance and cost of living adjustment of $2,500 per month |
(7) | Represents 1099 payments to Mr. Bluher of which $12,000 have been deferred |
(5)(8)
| All Other Compensation consists of: (i) payments made to Big John's Store LLC, a company managed and owned by John Hofman, under an Idaho Management Agreement with Big John's Store LLC for the provision of management services and office and warehouse space in the amount of $150,000 during 2016 and 2015, and $132,000 during 2014; (ii) medical insurance premiums in the amount of $13,823 during 2016, $16,045 during 2015 and $17,455 during 2014; and (iii) contributions to a Health Savings Account for the benefit of Mr. Hofman in the amount of $7,750 during 2016, $8,650 during 2015 and $6,550 during 2014. |
(6)(9)
| All Other Compensation consists of: (i) expense reimbursement of $1,800 during 2016, 2015 and 2014 and (ii) medical insurance premiums in the amount of $4,314 during 2016, $3,276 during 2015 and $6,873 during 2014. |
Additional Compensation
We have not grantedDuring the year ended December 31, 2017, the company paid a stock award to our officers or directors any stock options, stock awards or other formsCFO of equity compensation.1,500,000 shares valued at $900,000.
We do not have any retirement, pension or profit sharing plans covering our officers or directors, and we are not contemplating implementing any such plans at this time.
Director Compensation
OurIn Fiscal 2017, our nominating and corporate governance committee approved a policy (the "Director Compensation Policy) for the compensation of non-employee members of our board of directors do not currentlyto attract, retain, and reward individuals and align their financial interest with those of our stockholders. Only non-employee directors are eligible for compensation under this policy
The members of our Board of Directors have agreed to delay cash payments of earned under the Director Compensation Policy until such time as the Company has a positive EBITDA. Until then, delayed payments may be paid in restricted stock as determined by management and the board.
Initial Award
Under the Director Compensation Policy, when an eligible director initially joins our board of directors, the eligible director received an initial award of restricted stock units having a value of $30,000.
Annual Awards
Under the Director Compensation Policy, each eligible director shall receive anyan annual award of $20,000 for their service to the Company. In addition, the Lead Independent Director and each director servings as committee chair will receive an additional $2,000 to their annual award.
Board Meeting Awards
Under the Director Compensation Policy, each eligible director shall receive $2,000 for their attendance at each directors meeting that they attend.
Director Compensation Table
The following table presents summary information regarding the compensation for serving in their capacities as directors and we have not compensatedpaid to our non-employee directors for service in such capacity in the past.year ended December 31, 2017:
Director | | Board Fees (1) | | | | Other ($) | | | | Total ($) | |
| J. Allen Kosowsky | | $ | 60,000 | | (2) | | $ | 59,000 | | (6) | | $ | 119,000 | |
| Thomas Bruderman | | $ | 58,000 | | (3) | | $ | - | | | | $ | 58,000 | |
| Robert Lentz | | $ | 56,000 | | (4) | | $ | - | | | | $ | 56,000 | |
| Robert Zahm | | $ | 58,000 | | (5) | | $ | - | | | | $ | 58,000 | |
(1) | Amounts reported in this column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock issued as payment of amounts owed |
(2) | Amount paid through the issuance of 100,000 restricted shares of the Company's common stock at $0.60 per share. The common stock has a 10 month vesting period |
(3) | Amount paid through the issuance of 96,666 restricted shares of the Company's common stock at $0.60 per share. The common stock has a 10 month vesting period |
(4) | Amount paid through the issuance of 93,333 restricted shares of the Company's common stock at $0.60 per share. The common stock has a 10 month vesting period |
(5) | Amount paid through the issuance of 96,666 restricted shares of the Company's common stock at $0.60 per share. The common stock has a 10 month vesting period |
(6) | Represents fees paid for consulting services performed outside the scope of Mr. Kosowsky's board duties. Amount paid through the issuance of 98,334 restricted shares of the Company's common stock at $0.60 per share. The common stock has a 10 month vesting period |
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth as of April 14, 2017March 30, 2018 the number of shares of the Company's common stock, par value $0.001,$0.0001, owned of record or beneficially by each person known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of the issued and outstanding shares of the Company's common stock, and by each of the Company's officers and directors, and by all officers and directors as a group. On such date, there were 21,790,68377,610,171 issued and outstanding shares of our common stock and 3,783,7913,639,783 issued and outstanding shares of our Series A preferred stock. To the best of our knowledge, each person named below has sole voting and investment power, subject to community property laws where applicable, with respect to the shares shown unless otherwise indicated.
In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by an individual or entity and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options, warrants or other rights held by such person that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days of April 14, 2017March 30, 2018 are considered outstanding, although these shares are not considered outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
We know of no arrangements, including pledges, by or among any of the forgoing persons, the operation of which could result in a change of control of the Company
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | | Number of Shares of Common Stock | | | Amount of Number of Share Equivalents(2) | | | Total Beneficial Ownership | | | Percentage of Class | |
| Principal Stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Mag Ventures, LLC(14) 3 Fawn Hill Rd Burlington, CT 06013 | | | 200,000 | | | | 4,213,730 | (3) | | | 4,413,730 | | | | 16.97 | % |
AltEnergy Cyber, LLC(15) 137 Rowayton Ave Norwalk, CT 06853 | | | - | | | | 8,941,316 | (4) | | | 8,941,316 | | | | 29.09 | % |
Franklin S. Tuck 29 Tulip Tree Ln Darien, CT 06820 | | | - | | | | 2,997,016 | (5) | | | 2,997,016 | | | | 12.09 | % |
Robert Zahm 7 Ridgewood Dr Rye, NY 10580 | | | - | | | | 4,855,531 | (6) | | | 4,855,531 | | | | 18.22 | % |
John Snyder 10 Stone Fence Rd Bernardsville, NJ 07924 | | | - | | | | 1,443,156 | (7) | | | 1,443,156 | | | | 6.21 | % |
Growth Ventures, Inc.(16) 14 Red Tail Dr Highlands Ranch, CO 80126 | | | 750,000 | | | | 950,000 | (8) | | | 1,700,000 | | | | 7.48 | % |
Dr. Rao Kothapalli 2501 Jimmie Johnson Blvd #500 Port Arthur, TX 77640 | | | 500,000 | | | | 980,383 | (9) | | | 1,480,393 | | | | 6.50 | % |
Hugh B. Underwood 19853 Park Dr Saratoga, CA 95070 | | | 366,670 | | | | 1,478,006 | (10) | | | 1,844,676 | | | | 7.93 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Officers and Directors | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| John Hayes | | | 6,492,586 | | | | 2,322,970 | (11) | | | 8,815,556 | | | | 36.56 | % |
| Robert Graham | | | 3,540,000 | | | | 1,597,947 | (12) | | | 5,137,947 | | | | 21.97 | % |
| Robert Lentz | | | 100,000 | | | | 142,740 | (13) | | | 242,740 | | | | * | % |
| John Bluher | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | * | % |
All Officers and Directors As Group (4 Persons) | | | 10,132,586 | | | | 4,063,657 | | | | 14,196,243 | | | | 54.91 | % |
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner(1) | | Number of Shares of Common Stock | | | Amount of Number of Share Equivalents(2) | | | Total Beneficial Ownership | | | Percentage of Class | |
| Principal Stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | |
AltEnergy Cyber, LLC(3) 137 Rowayton Ave Norwalk, CT 06853 | | | - | | | | 8,941,316 | (4) | | | 8,941,316 | | | | 10.40 | % |
Conyers Investments, LLC(5) Phillips Point East #1001 777 S. Flagler Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33401 | | | 6,311,006 | | | | 704,178 | (6) | | | 7,015,184 | | | | 9.02 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Officers and Directors(13) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| John Hayes | | | 17,951,611 | | | | 6,984,935 | (7) | | | 24,936,546 | | | | 29,67 | % |
| Robert Graham | | | 4,545,716 | | | | 637,950 | (8) | | | 5,183,666 | | | | 6.67 | % |
| John Bluher | | | 1,500,000 | | | | - | | | | - | | | | 1.95 | % |
| Robert Lentz | | | 486,074 | | | | - | | | | 486,074 | | | | * | % |
Thomas Bruderman(9) | | | 366,667 | | | | 4,350,397 | (10) | | | 4,717,064 | | | | 5.79 | % |
| Robert Zahm | | | 96,667 | | | | 5,022,207 | (11) | | | 5,118,874 | | | | 6.24 | % |
| J. Allen Kosowsky | | | 326,109 | | | | 294,448 | (12) | | | 620,557 | | | | * | % |
All Officers and Directors As Group (7 Persons) | | | 25,272,844 | | | | 17,289,937 | | | | 42,562,781 | | | | 55.24 | % |
* less than 1%
(1) | The address for each named executive officer and director is the same address as the Company |
(2) | Represents number of commons shares issuable upon exercise of warrants, options, and conversion of preferred stock |
(3) | Russ Stidolph is the Managing Member of AltEnergy Cyber, LLC |
(4) | Represents 3,154,7104,026,020 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 315,471 shares of preferred stock and 1,059,020 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants |
(4)
| Represents 4,026,012 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 402,601402,602 shares of preferred stock and 4,915,304 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants |
(5) | Represents 2,877,016 sharesChristopher Uzpen is the Managing Member of common stock issuable upon conversion of 287,702 shares of preferred stock and 120,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrantsConyers Investments, LLC |
(6) | Represents shares of common stock issuable upon conversionexercise of 485,553 shares of preferred stockwarrants |
(7) | Represents 417,650 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 144,316 shares of preferred stock |
(8)
| Represents 200,000 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 20,00041,765 shares of preferred stock and 750,0006,567,285 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants |
(9)(8)
| Represents 637,950 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 98,03963,795 shares of preferred stock |
(9) | Includes shares owned by Mr. Bruderman and Mag Ventures, LLC of which Mr. Bruderman is the Managing Member |
(10) | Represents 1,111,3363,154,710 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 111,134315,471 shares of preferred stock and 366,6701,195,687 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants |
(11) | Represents 417,6474,855,540 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 41,765485,554 shares of preferred stock 1,105,323and 166,667 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of warrants |
(12) | Represents 83,340 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 8,334 shares of preferred stock and 800,000211,108 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of options |
(12)
| Represents 637,947 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 63,795 shares of preferred stock, and 960,000 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of optionswarrants |
(13) | Represents common stock issuable upon exerciseAddresses of options |
(14)
| Thomas BrudermanDirectors and Officers is the Managing Member of Mag Ventures, LLC |
(15)
| Russ Stidolph is the Managing Member of AltEnergy Cyber, LLC |
(16)
| Gary McAdam is the Trustee of Growth Venture, IncCompany address |
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence
Unless otherwise indicated, the terms of the following transactions between related parties were not determined as a result of arm's length negotiations.
As of December 31, 2016, we were indebted to Bruce Crane,John Hayes, an officer director and principal stockholder of the Company, in the principal amount of $3,500 pursuant to a demand note bearing interest at 6% per annum and in the aggregate amount of $939 pursuant to non-interest bearing advances with no formal repayment terms.
As of December 31, 2016, we were indebted to John Hofman, an officer, director and principalsignificant stockholder of the Company, in the aggregate principal amount of $167,252$3,813,638 pursuant to demand notes bearing interest at 6%12% per annum.
As of December 31, 2017, we were indebted to 18%John Hayes, an officer and significant stockholder of the Company, in the aggregate principal amount of $338,000 pursuant to demand notes bearing interest at 12% per annumannum.
During the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred interest expense on notes to related parties in the aggregate amount of $8,188 pursuant to non-interest bearing advances with no formal repayment terms.$604,145 and 649,362, respectively (see Note 6 – Convertible Notes).
BrownWick, LLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into an Idaho Management Agreement dated as of February 1, 2011, with Big John's Store LLC, a company owned by John Hofman, our president, director and a principal stockholder, pursuant to which we pay a monthly management fee to Big John's Store LLC to manage our day-to-day business activities and provide us with office and warehouse space. The agreement is on a month-to-month basis and can be cancelled at any time byDuring the vote of management. We have historically paid monthly management fees in varying amounts to Big John's Store LLC pursuant to prior agreements approved by our stockholders. The agreement was amended and restated on October 31, 2014 to increase the monthly fee from $10,700 to $12,500 effective as of November 1, 2014. The monthly fee will be evaluated on an annual basis to take into account any future increases in Big John's Store's costs of providing the warehouse/office space, however there are no plans to increase the monthly fee at this time. The total management fees paid to Big John's Store LLC were $150,000 during both fiscal yearsyear ended December 31, 20162017, the Company incurred professional expenses in the amount of $90,000, which was paid through the issuance of 150,000 shares of restricted stock, to Robert Lentz, a director, for services related to business development activities performed that were outside the scope of his board position.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued Robert Lentz, a director, 142,740 shares of the Company's common stock as payment for board duties performed in a previous year.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred professional expenses in the amount of $59,000, which was paid through the issuance of 98,334 shares of restricted stock, to J. Allen Kosowsky, a director, for services related to consulting activities performed that were outside the scope of his board position.
Between February 9, 2017 and 2015.March 2, 2017, the Company issued warrants to purchase 83,334 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.60 to John Hayes, an executive officer and significant shareholder, in conjunction with short term advances extended to the Company The warrants were valued at $15,504 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded to additional paid in capital.
On March 6, 2017, the Company issued warrants to purchase 83,334 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.60 to Thomas Bruderman, director, in conjunction with short term advances extended to the Company. The warrants were valued at $12,441 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded to additional paid in capital.
On August 29, 2017, the Company issued 44,445 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 44,445 shares of common stock at a price per share of $0.60 to J. Allen Kosowsky, a director, for gross proceeds of $20,000 or $0.45 per share. The terms of this issuance were the Idaho Management Agreement are notsame as terms offered to non-related parties during the result of arm's length negotiations.
BrownWick, LLC also pays Bruce Crane $150On August 29, 2017, the Company issued 70,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 70,000 shares of common stock at a price per monthshare of $0.60 to Thomas Bruderman, a director, for expense reimbursement.
Eachgross proceeds of John Hofman and Bruce Crane, our officers, directors and principal stockholders, own retail companies that purchase grain mills and other products from the Company. Sales to these related parties totaled $43,664 and $81,062 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively,$35,000 or approximately 4% and 5%$0.45 per share. The terms of our total sales for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Accounts receivable from these related partiesthis issuance were $6,905 and $6,365 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Sales to these related parties are on the same as terms as salesoffered to unrelated third parties.non-related parties during the same time period.
Director Independence
Our board of directors consists of threesix persons, Robert Graham, John Hayes, Robert Lentz Thomas Bruderman, J. Allen Kosowsky and Robert Lentz.Zahm. Messrs. Graham and Hayes are not "independent" within the meaning of Rule 5605(a)(2) of the NASDAQ Marketplace because they are officers and employees of the Company. Mr.Messrs. Lentz, isBruderman, Kosowsky and Zahm are considered independent.
Indemnification
Our articles of incorporation provide that to the fullest extent permitted by Nevada law, now or hereafter in force, no director of the Company shall be personally liable to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director. In addition, Section 78.037 of the Nevada corporation law, Article Fourteenth of our articles of incorporation, and Section VII of our bylaws generally provide for indemnification of our directors and officers in a variety of circumstances, which may include liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers, and controlling persons pursuant to the foregoing provisions, we have been informed that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is contrary to public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and, therefore, is unenforceable.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C. served as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.2016.
Haynie & Company served as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017. Haynie & Company was appointed on January 1, 2018 to audit our 2017 year end.
During the fiscal years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, fees for services provided by Pritchett, Siler & Hardy, P.C. were as follows:follows. No fees were paid to Haynie & Company during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
| | Year Ended | | Year Ended | |
| | December 31, | | December 31, | |
| | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Audit Fees | | $ | 22,870 | | | $ | 22,800 | | | $ | 104,312 | | | $ | 40,000 | |
| Audit-Related Fees | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Tax Fees | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| All Other Fees | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | $ | 22,870 | | | $ | 22,800 | | | $ | 104,312 | | | $ | 40,000 | |
"Audit Fees" consisted of fees billed for services rendered for the audit of the Company's annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in the Company's quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and other services normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. "Audit-Related Fees" consisted of fees billed for due diligence procedures in connection with acquisitions and divestitures and consultation regarding financial accounting and reporting matters. "Tax Fees" consisted of fees billed for tax payment planning and tax preparation services. "All Other Fees" consisted of fees billed for services in connection with legal matters and technical accounting research.
The Company's Board of Directors functions as its audit committee. It is the policy of the Company for all work performed by our principal accountant to be approved in advance by the Board of Directors. All of the services described above in this Item 14 were approved in advance by our Board of Directors.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
The following documents are included as exhibits to this report.
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit Number | | Title of Document |
| | |
| 3.1 | | |
| 3.2 | | |
| 4.1 | | |
| 4.2 | | |
| 10.1 | | |
| 10.2 | | |
| 10.3 | | |
| 10.4 | | |
| 10.5 | | |
| 10.6 | | |
| 10.7 | | |
| 10.8 | | |
| 10.9 | | |
| 10.10 | | |
| 10.11 | | |
| 10.12 | | Form of convertible note issued December 21, 2017 and December 22, 2017 * |
| 31.1 | | Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Executive Officer * |
| 31.2 | | Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer * |
| 32.1 | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Executive Officer * |
| 32.2 | | Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer * |
| 101 INS | | XBRL Instance Document** |
| 101 SCH | | XBRL Schema Document ** |
| 101 CAL | | XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document ** |
| 101 DEF | | XBRL Definition Linkbase Document ** |
| 101 LAB | | XBRL Labels Linkbase Document ** |
| 101 PRE | | XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document ** |
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10-12G filed May 14, 2010. |
(2) Incorporated by reference to Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10-12G filed July 13, 2010. |
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Company's 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2011. |
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Company's March 31, 2011 Report on Form 10-Q filed May 13, 2011. |
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Company's June 30, 2011 Report on Form 10-Q filed August 12, 2011. |
(6) Incorporated by reference to the Company's September 30, 2011 Report on Form 10-Q filed November 10, 2011. |
(7) Incorporated by reference to the Company's March 31, 2012 Report on Form 10-Q filed May 15, 2012. |
(8) Incorporated by reference to the Company's September 30, 2012 Report on Form 10-Q filed November 14, 2012. |
(9) Incorporated by reference to the Company's March 31, 2013 Report on Form 10-Q filed May 15, 2013. |
(10) Incorporated by reference to the Company's June 30, 20132017 Report on Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2013.2017. |
(11) (2) | Incorporated by reference to Exhibit Numbers 3.1 and 3.2 of the Company's September 30, 2013 Reportregistration statement on Form 10-Q10 filed Novemberwith the SEC on May 14, 2013.2010. |
(12) Incorporated by reference to the Company's 2013 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2014.(3) |
(13) Incorporated by reference to the Company's June 30, 2014 Report on Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2014. |
(14) Incorporated by reference to the Company's September 30, 2014 Report on Form 10-Q filed November 18, 2014. |
(15) Incorporated by reference to the Company's 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 31, 2015. |
(16) Incorporated by reference to the Company's March 31, 2015 Report on Form 10-Q filed May 13, 2015. |
(17) Incorporated by reference to the Company's June 30, 2015 Report on Form 10-Q filed August 14, 2015. |
(18) Incorporated by reference to the Company's September 30, 2015 Report on Form 10-Q filed November 16, 2015. |
(19) Incorporated by reference to the Company's December 31, 2015 Report on Form 10-K filed March 30, 2016. |
(20) Incorporated by reference to the Company's March 31, 2016 Report on Form 10-Q filed May 20, 2016. |
(21) Incorporated by reference to the Company's June 30, 2016 Report on Form 10-Q filed August 15, 2016. |
(22) Incorporated by reference to the Company's September 30, 2016 Report on Form 10-Q filed November 16, 2015.14, 2016. |
(23)(4)
| Incorporated by reference to Exhibit Number 10.1 of the current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 7, 2016 and amended on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 24, 20172017. |
(24)(5)
| Incorporated by reference to the current reportCompany's March 31, 2017 Report on Form 8-K10-Q filed with the SEC on February 24, 2017 |
(25)Incorporated by reference to the current report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on April 6, 2017
May 15, 2017. |
*Filed herewith
**The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
The registrant opts out of providing a Form 10-K summary.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| | Grote Molen,BlackRidge Technology International, Inc. |
| | |
| | |
Dated: April 14, 20172, 2018 | By /s/ Robert Graham |
| | Robert Graham |
| | Chief Executive Officer and President |
In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Dated: April 14, 20172, 2018 | By /s/ Robert Graham | |
| | Robert Graham | |
| | Chief Executive Officer and President | |
| | |
Dated: April 14, 20172, 2018 | By /s/ John Bluher | |
| | John Bluher | |
| | Chief Financial Officer | |
| | |
| Dated: April 2, 2018 | By /s/ J. Allen Kosowsky | |
| J. Allen Kosowsky | |
| | |
| | |
| Dated: April 2, 2018 | By /s/ Thomas Bruderman | |
| Thomas Bruderman | |
| Director | |
| | |
| Dated: April 2, 2018 | By /s/ Robert Zahm | |
| Robert Zahm | |
| Director | |
| | |
| Dated: April 2, 2018 | By /s/ Robert Lentz | |
| Robert Lentz | |
| Director | |
| Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities | | | | | | | | |
| Wages payable included in capitalized intangible assets | | $ | 215,705 | | | $ | 532,324 | |
| Wages payable settled with common stock | | $ | 13,238,453 | | | $ | - | |
| Accounts payable settled with common stock | | $ | 238,035 | | | $ | - | |
| Common stock converted to preferred stock | | $ | 500 | | | $ | - | |
| Common stock issued for debt and interest conversion | | $ | 5,378,628 | | | $ | - | |
| | $ | 483,957 | | | $ | - | |
| Warrants issued in conjunction with debt agreements | | $ | 567,166 | | | $ | - | |
| Beneficial conversion feature on convertible debt | | $ | 536,165 | | | $ | - | |
| Warrants issued and expensed in conjunction with advances | | $ | 27,945 | | | $ | - | |
| Notes payable issued to settle liabilities | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,200,000 | |
| Preferred stock issued for accrued interest | | $ | - | | | $ | 4,097,831 | |
| Preferred stock issued for accrued interest – related party | | $ | - | | | $ | 268,880 | |
| Preferred stock issued for convertible notes | | $ | - | | | $ | 9,452,000 | |
| Preferred stock issued for convertible notes – related party | | $ | - | | | $ | 230,763 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest | | $ | 16,654 | | | $ | 311 | |
| Cash paid for income taxes | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
BLACKRIDGE TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016 and 2015
NOTE 1 ‑– ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization – Blackridge Holdings,BlackRidge Technology International, Inc. (the "Company") was organizedincorporated under the laws of the State of DelawareNevada on April 23, 2010.March 15, 2004 under the name "Grote Molen, Inc." The Company sells identity basedidentity-based network security to protect hybrid cloud and mainframe workloads from cyber-attacks and insider threats.
On September 6, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of reorganization with Grote Molen,BlackRidge Technology International, Inc., a NevadaDelaware corporation, and Grote Merger Co.(together "Grote"), a Delaware corporation providing for Grote'sthe Company's acquisition of the CompanyBlackRidge in exchange for a controlling number of shares of the Grote'sCompany's preferred and common stock pursuant to the merger of Grote Merger Co. with and into BlackRidge, with BlackridgeBlackRidge continuing as the surviving corporation. ThisThe transaction contemplated in the agreement was finalizedclosed on February 22, 2017.
On July 2, 2017, (see Note 10 – Subsequent Events).the Company filed a Certificate to Accompany Restated Articles or Amended and Restated Articles with the Secretary of State of Nevada to, among other things, change the Company's name to BlackRidge Technology International, Inc.
On September 22, 2017, the Company formed a new business subsidiary called BlackRidge Secure Blockchain to pursue new market opportunities for securing blockchain applications.
On October 13, 2017, the Company formed a new business subsidiary called BlackRidge Secure Services to work with partners on Secure Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Systems ("SCADA") infrastructure and to design and deliver secure systems using BlackRidge Technology products for use by the Utilities Industry
Principles of Consolidation - The Company and its subsidiaries consist of the following entities, which have been consolidated in the accompanying financial statements:
Blackridge
BlackRidge Technology International, Inc.
BlackRidge Technology Holding, Inc.
BlackridgeBlackRidge Technology, Inc.
BlackridgeBlackRidge Technology Government, Inc.
BlackRidge Secure Blockchain, Inc
BlackRidge Secure Services, Inc.
All intercompany balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments- The Company's financial instruments consist of cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, notes payable and convertible debt. The carrying amount of these financial instruments approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of these items.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimated by management.
Concentrations - Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and accounts receivable. The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The cash balance at times may exceed federally insured limits. Management believes the financial risk associated with these balances is minimal and has not experienced any losses to date. At December 31, 2016 and 2015,2017, the Company had no cash balances in excess of FDIC insured limits of $169,751. At December 31, 2016, the Company did not have any cash balances in excess of FDIC insured limits.
Significant customers are those which represent more than 10% of the Company's revenue for each period presented, or the Company's accounts receivable balance as of each respective balance sheet date. For each significant customer, revenue as a percentage of total revenue and accounts receivable as a percentage of total net accounts receivable are as follows:
| | Revenue | | Accounts Receivable | |
| | Years Ended December 31 | | December 31 | |
| 2016 | | 2015 | | 2016 | | 2015 | |
| Customer A | | | 55 | % | | | - | | | | - | | | | - | |
| Customer B | | | 33 | % | | | 9 | % | | | - | | | | - | |
| Customer C | | | - | | | | 49 | % | | | - | | | | - | |
| Customer D | | | - | | | | 42 | % | | | - | | | | 100 | % |
| | Revenue | | Accounts Receivable | |
| | Year Ended December 31, | | December 31, | |
Customers | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| Customer A | | | 41 | % | | | 33 | % | | | - | | | | - | |
| Customer B | | | 34 | % | | | - | % | | | - | | | | - | |
| Customer C | | | 12 | % | | | 55 | % | | | 15 | % | | | - | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid debt investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - Accounts receivable represents trade obligations from customers that are subject to normal trade collection terms and are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of any allowance for doubtful accounts, and do not typically bear interest. The Company assesses the collectability of the accounts by taking into consideration the aging of accounts receivable, changes in customer credit worthiness, general market and economic conditions, and historical experience. Bad debt expenses are recorded as part of selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company writes off the receivable balance against the allowance when management determines a balance is uncollectible. The Company also reviews its customer discounts and an accrual is made for discounts earned but not yet utilized at each period end. The Company does not believe there to be any question as to the collectability of its receivables as of December 31, 20152017 and 2016 and has, therefore, not created an allowance as of this date.
Inventory - Inventory is valued at the lower of cost or market value. Product-related inventories are primarily maintained using the average cost method. When market value is determined to be less than cost, the Company records an allowance for obsolescence. The company's inventory assets at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 consisted primarily of hardware appliances valued as follows:
| | | As of December 31, 2016 | | | As of December 31, 2015 | | | As of December 31, 2017 | | | As of December 31, 2016 | |
| Inventory | | $ | 335,655 | | | $ | 345,930 | | | $ | 376,063 | | | $ | 335,655 | |
| Less: allowance for obsolescence | | | (335,655 | ) | | | (345,930 | ) | | | (335,655 | ) | | | (335,655 | ) |
| | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 40,408 | | | $ | - | |
Revenue Recognition - We account for product revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification 605, Revenue Recognition, and all related interpretations. Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Revenue generally is recognized net of allowances for returns and any taxes collected from customers and subsequently remitted to governmental authorities.
Revenue recognition for multiple-element arrangements requires judgment to determine if multiple elements exist, whether elements can be accounted for as separate units of accounting, and if so, the fair value for each of the elements.
The Company may enter into arrangements that can include various combinations of software, services, and hardware. Where elements are delivered over different periods of time, and when allowed under U.S. GAAP, revenue is allocated to the respective elements based on their relative selling prices at the inception of the arrangement, and revenue is recognized as each element is delivered. We use a hierarchy to determine the fair value to be used for allocating revenue to elements: (i) vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value ("VSOE"), (ii) third-party evidence, and (iii) best estimate of selling price ("ESP"). For software elements, we follow the industry specific software guidance which only allows for the use of VSOE in establishing fair value. Generally, VSOE is the price charged when the deliverable is sold separately, or the price established by management for a product that is not yet sold if it is probable that the price will not change before introduction into the marketplace. ESPs are established as best estimates of what the selling prices would be if the deliverables were sold regularly on a stand-alone basis. Our process for determining ESPs requires judgment and considers multiple factors that may vary over time depending upon the unique facts and circumstances related to each deliverable.
Any revenue received that does not yet meet the above recognition standards is recorded to unearned revenue and held as a liability until recognition occurs.
Property and Equipment - Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets or, in the case of leasehold improvements, the remaining lease term, if shorter. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the assets and related accumulated depreciation are removed, and the resulting gains or losses are recorded as part of other income or expense in the statements of operations. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
The estimated useful lives of the property and equipment are as follows:
Property and Equipment | Estimated Useful Life |
| Building improvements | 15 years |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | 7 years |
| Computer equipment | 5 years |
Intangible Assets - Acquired intangible assets are recorded at estimated fair value, net of accumulated amortization. Costs incurred in obtaining certain patents and intellectual property as well as software development expenses, are capitalized and amortized over their related estimated useful lives, using a straight-line basis consistent with the underlying expected future cash flows related to the specific intangible asset. Costs to renew or extend the life of intangible assets are capitalized and amortized over the remaining useful life of the asset. Amortization expenses are included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company's continued ability to extend and/or renew the rights associated with these intangible assets may have an impact on future cash flows.
Useful life estimates for the Company's significant intangible asset classes are as follows:
| | Useful Life |
| Patent Costs | 20 years |
| Software Licenses | 7 years |
| Software Development Costs | 15 years |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets- The Company reviews long-lived assets, at least annually, to determine if impairment has occurred and whether the economic benefit of the asset (fair value of assets to be used and fair value less disposal cost for assets to be disposed of) is expected to be less than the carrying value. Triggering events, which signal further analysis, consist of a significant decrease in the asset's market value, a substantial change in the use of an asset, a significant physical change in the asset, a significant change in the legal or business climate that could affect the asset, an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected to acquire or construct the asset, or a history of losses that imply continued loss associated with assets used to generate revenue.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share -– The basic computation of loss per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period presented in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings Per Share". The computation of diluted earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period plus the common stock equivalents which would arise from the exercise of stock options and warrants outstanding using the treasury stock method and the average market price per share during the period. Common stock equivalents are not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation when their effect is antidilutive.
Income Taxes - Income taxes are provided in accordance with ASC 740 Accounting for Income Taxes. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from the net change during the year of deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion of all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.
Provision for income taxes consists of federal and state income taxes in the United States. Due to uncertainty as to the realization of benefits from our deferred tax assets, including net operating loss carry-forwards and other tax credits, we have a full valuation allowance reserved against such assets. We expect to maintain this full valuation allowance at least in the near term.
Reclassification – Certain December 31, 2016 amounts disclosed in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications are for presentation purposes only and have no effect on the Company's net loss or financial position in any of the periods presented
Share-Based Payments and Stock-Based Compensation – Share-based compensation awards, including stock options and restricted stock awards, are recorded at estimated fair value on the applicable award's grant date, based on estimated number of awards that are expected to vest. The grant date fair value is amortized on a straight-line basis over the time in which the awards are expected to vest, or immediately if no vesting is required. Share-based compensation awards issued to non-employees for services are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payments whichever is more readily determinable. The fair value of restricted stock awards is based on the fair value of the stock underlying the awards on the grant date as there is no exercise price.
Recently Enacted Accounting Standards - From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by FASB that are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date. If not discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements upon adoption.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes Topic 840, Leases ("ASU 2016-02"). The guidance in this new standard requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses on their income statements in a manner similar to the current accounting and eliminates the current real estate-specific provisions for all entities. The guidance also modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases for lessors. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02.
In May 2014, in addition to several amendments issued during 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." This pronouncement updated the accounting guidance related to revenue from contracts with customers, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. The standard defines a five-step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. These updates are effective for the Company for its annual period ending December 31, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of this guidance did not have a significant impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTE 2 - GOING–GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, during the year ended December 31, 20162017 the Company incurred a net loss of $7,215,820$15,345,644 and inception to date losses are equal to $34,550,732.$49,896,376. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. In this regard, management is proposing to raise any necessary additional funds not provided by operations through investment capital. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising this additional capital or in achieving profitable operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
NOTE 3 –
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2016:
| | | As of December 31, 2017 | | | As of December 31, 2016 | | Estimated Useful Life |
| Building improvements | | | 55,390 | | | | - | | 15 years |
| Furniture, fixtures and equipment | | | 26,101 | | | | - | | 7 years |
| Computer equipment | | | 8,927 | | | | - | | 5 years |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (790 | ) | | | - | | |
| | | $ | 87,628 | | | $ | - | | |
The Company records depreciation expense on a straight-line basis over the estimated life of the related asset. The Company recorded depreciation expense of $790 during the year ended December 31, 2017.
NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS
In accordance with ASC 350-40, ASC 350-50, and ASC 985-20, during the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company capitalized $1,588,694$1,563,122 and $1,537,878,$1,588,694, respectively, towards the development of software, intellectual property, and patent expenses.
The Company amortizes these costs over their related useful lives (approximately 7 to 20 years), using a straight-line basis. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques, including market and income approaches as considered necessary. The Company recorded amortization of $365,134$443,021 and $259,875$365,134 related to intangible assets during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Intangible assets consisted of the following at December 31, 2017 and 2015, respectively.
| | | | | | | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2016 | | | As of December 31, 2015 | | Amortization Period |
| Patent costs | | | 422,995 | | | | 397,900 | | 20 years |
| Software licenses | | | 58,260 | | | | 58,260 | | 7 years |
| Capitalized software development costs | | | 6,432,075 | | | | 4,868,476 | | 15 years |
| Less: accumulated depreciation | | | (989,787 | ) | | | (624,653 | ) | |
| | | $ | 5,923,543 | | | $ | 4,699,983 | | |
| | | As of December 31, 2017 | | | As of December 31, 2016 | | Estimated Useful Life |
| Patent Costs | | | 397,417 | | | | 422,995 | | 15 years |
| Software Licenses | | | 58,260 | | | | 58,260 | | 7 years |
| Software Development Costs | | | 8,020,775 | | | | 6,432,075 | | 5 years |
| Less: accumulated amortization | | | (1,432,808 | ) | | | (989,787 | ) | |
| | | $ | 7,043,644 | | | $ | 5,923,543 | | |
NOTE 45 – NOTES PAYABLE
Short term notes
At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company had outstanding short termshort-term debt totaling $89,221.$50,232 and $89,221, respectively. These notes bear interest at the raterates of between 10% and 12% annually and have maturity dates ranging from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2014. As some of these notes have exceeded their initial maturity dates, they are subject to the default interest rate of 18% per annum.
The following table summarizes the Company's short termshort-term notes payable for the years Endedended December 31, 20162017 and 2015:2016:
| | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | December 31, 2017 | | | December 31, 2016 | |
| Beginning Balance | | $ | 89,221 | | | $ | 149,221 | | | $ | 89,221 | | | $ | 89,221 | |
| Repayments on loans | | | - | | | | (60,000 | ) | |
| Notes acquired in business acquisition | | | | 208,811 | | | | - | |
| Repayments – continuing operations | | | | (38,989 | ) | | | - | |
| Repayments – discontinued operations | | | | (53,132 | ) | | | - | |
| Notes divested in disposal of discontinued operations | | | | (155,679 | ) | | | - | |
| Ending Balance | | $ | 89,221 | | | $ | 89,221 | | | $ | 50,232 | | | $ | 89,221 | |
Long term notes
On November 2, 2016 the Company entered into settlement agreements with two holders of convertible debt and other payables in which the Company agreed to issue new long-term debt agreements as settlement of amounts due. Pursuant to these agreements, the Company issued two non-interest bearing $600,000 notes payable in 36 equal installments of 16,667 beginning on January 1, 2017 and Maturing on December 1, 2019.
The following table summarizes the Company's long termlong-term notes payable for the years Endedended December 31, 20162017 and 2015:2016:
| | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | December 31, 2017 | | | December 31, 2016 | |
| Beginning Balance | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,200,000 | | | $ | - | |
| Debt Issuances | | | 1,200,000 | | | | - | | |
| Repayments | | | - | | | | - | | |
| Notes acquired in business acquisition | | | | 136,830 | | | | 1,200,000 | |
| Repayments – continuing operations | | | | (433,342 | ) | | | - | |
| Repayments – discontinued operations | | | | (1,603 | ) | | | - | |
| Notes divested in disposal of discontinued operations | | | | (135,227 | ) | | | - | |
| Ending Balance | | $ | 1,200,000 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 766,658 | | | $ | 1,200,000 | |
| Short Term Portion of Long Term Debt | | $ | 400,000 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 400,000 | | | $ | 400,000 | |
| Long Term Debt | | $ | 800,000 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 366,658 | | | $ | 800,000 | |
NOTE 56 – CONVERTIBLE NOTES
During year ended December 31, 2015Short term convertible notes
On February 2, 2017, the Company issued a $100,000 convertible debt totaling $2,255,940, netnote bearing interest at 10% per annum. The note matures on March 31, 2018 and is convertible at a price of discounts, bearing 12% interest$0.66 per annum with original maturity dates ranging from one monthshare at the holder's request. The noteholder was also granted detachable 5 year warrants to eleven months in term. The debt holders are entitled, at their option, to convert all or partpurchase an aggregate of the principal and accrued interest into166,667 shares of the Company'scompany's common stock.stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share. The notes also containwarrants were valued at $31,002 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded as a provision for automatic conversion ifdiscount to the Company raises gross proceeds of $3,000,000debt agreement. The note was repaid in a preferred capital raise.
On November 2, 2016, the Company entered into settlement agreements with two holders of convertible debt in which the Company agreed to issue new long-term debt agreements as settlement of amounts due. Included in the terms of these agreements was convertible debt totaling $145,945 and accrued interest totaling $202,326 which was refinanced into the new notes.
On November 15, 2016, the Company completed a capital raise which triggered certain automatic conversion provisions in many of its convertible notes. Consequently, the company converted aggregate short term convertible notes totaling $9,452,000full on April 4, 2017 along with $1,785 in accrued interest of $4,097,831, and aggregate convertible notes to related parties of $230,763 along with accrued interest due to related parties of $268,880 into a total of 30,525,648 shares of its preferred stock.interest.
The following table summarizes the Company's convertible notes payable for the years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015:
| | | 2016 | | | 2015 | |
| Beginning Balance | | $ | 13,815,094 | | | $ | 11,324,982 | |
| Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes, net of issuance discounts | | | - | | | | 2,255,940 | |
| Conversion of notes payable into preferred stock | | | (9,452,000 | ) | | | - | |
| Conversion of related party notes payable into preferred stock | | | (230,763 | ) | | | - | |
| Settlement agreements | | | (145,945 | ) | | | - | |
| Amortization of discounts | | | 10,424 | | | | 234,172 | |
| Ending Balance | | $ | 3,996,810 | | | $ | 13,815,094 | |
| Convertible Notes, Short Term - Related Party | | $ | 284,172 | | | $ | 331,763 | |
| Convertible Notes, Short Term | | $ | - | | | $ | 9,587,521 | |
| Convertible Notes, Long Term – Related Party | | $ | 3,712,638 | | | $ | 3,895,810 | |
Short term convertible notes – related party
On November 1, 2011,October 31, 2013, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and significant shareholder invested $150,000 via a one year convertible note bearing interest at 12% annually and convertible into 89 shares of convertible preferred stock at the lesser of $1,700 per share or, a 10% discount from the price offered in the Company's preferred share offering. On November, 15, 2106 the company converted this debt along with accrued interest of $194,491 into 637,947 shares of the Company's preferred stock at the rate of $0.54 per share.
On November 1, 2013,Company agreed to convert balances owed to the Company's Corporate Counsel and Secretary invested $80,763 viaCouncil (as defined below) in the amount of $183,172 into a eighteen42 month convertible note bearing interest at 12% annually and convertible into 89,736203,525 shares of convertible preferred stock at the lesserrate of $0.90 per share or a 25% discount from the price offered in the Company's preferred share offering. On November, 15, 2016 the company converted this debt along with accrued interest of $74,389 into 344,781 shares of the Company's preferred stock at the rate of $0.45 per share.
On November 30, 2015, the Company's Chief Technology Officer and significant shareholder invested $101,000 via a one year convertible note bearing interest at 12% annually and convertible into 112,223 shares of convertible preferred stock at the lesser of $0.90 per share or a 25% discount from the price offered in the Company's preferred share offering. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the principal balance was still outstanding, and 2015, the Company hashad accrued interest for this note in the amount of $13,947$136,469 and $1,010,$84,172, respectively, which is included in accrued interest – related party on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The note carries a default rate of 18% for any principal not paid by the maturity date.
On October 31, 2013, the Company agreed to convert balances owed toNovember 30, 2015, the Company's Secretary in the amount of $183,172 intoChief Technology Officer and significant shareholder, John Hayes, invested $101,000 via a 42 monthone year convertible note bearing interest at 12% annually and convertible into 203,525112,223 shares of convertible preferred stock at the rate of $0.90 per share. On November 8, 2017, an additional $237,000 owed to Mr. Hayes was added to the note. At December 31, 20162017 and 2015, the principal under the note is still outstanding, andDecember 31, 2016, the Company has accrued interest for this note in the amount of $84,172$43,597 and $55,537,$13,947, respectively, which is included in accrued interest – related party on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The note carries a default rate of 18% for any principal not paid by the maturity date.
Long term convertible notes
On December 21, 2017, the Company issued a $150,000 convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum. The note matures on December 31, 2019 and is convertible into the Company's Series B Preferred Shares at a price of $0.32 per share at the holder's request. The Company has determined the note to contain a beneficial conversion feature valued at $69,935 based on the intrinsic per share value of the conversion feature. This beneficial conversion feature is recorded as a discount to the debt agreement. The noteholder was also granted detachable 5 year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 468,750 shares of the company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share. The warrants were valued at $69,935 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded as a discount to the debt agreement. At December 31, 2017, the principal balance was still outstanding, and the Company had accrued interest for this note in the amount of $329, which is included in accrued interest on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
On December 22, 2017, the Company issued a $1,000,000 convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum. The note matures on December 31, 2019 and is convertible into the Company's Series B Preferred Shares at a price of $0.32 per share at the holder's request. The Company has determined the note to contain a beneficial conversion feature valued at $466,230 based on the intrinsic per share value of the conversion feature. This beneficial conversion feature is recorded as a discount to the debt agreement. The noteholder was also granted detachable 5 year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 3,125,000 shares of the company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share. The warrants were valued at $466,230 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded as a discount to the debt agreement. At December 31, 2017, the principal balance was still outstanding, and the Company had accrued interest for this note in the amount of $1,973, which is included in accrued interest on the Company's consolidated balance sheets.
Long term convertible notes – related party
During 2011 2012, 2013, andto 2014, the Company's Chief TechnicalTechnology Officer and significant shareholder of the Company loaned a total of $2,673,200 to the Company. On October 1, 2014, all prior notes including accrued interest were combined into a single $3,712,637 convertible note bearing interest at 12% annually and convertible into 4,125,154 shares of preferred stock at the at the rate of $0.90 per share. AtOn November 9, 2017, the Company converted the note and accrued interest of $1,665,991 into 10,757,254 shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion rate of $0.50 per share. The Company also issued a 5 year warrant to purchase an additional 5,378,627 shares of the Company s common stock at a purchase price of $0.50 per share as further consideration for this conversion. The Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt related to this transaction of $913,238.
Convertible debt holders are entitled, at their option, to convert all or part of the principal and accrued interest into shares of the Company's common stock at the conversion prices and terms discussed above. The Company has determined that any embedded conversion options do not possess a beneficial conversion feature, and therefore has not separately accounted for their value.
The following table summarizes the Company's convertible notes payable for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015, the Company has accrued interest for this note in the amount of $1,143,791 and $597,619, respectively, which is included in accrued interest – related party on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The note matures on October 1, 2017 if the officer elects not to convert. The note carries a default rate of 18% for any principal not paid by the maturity date.2016:
| | | December 31, 2017 | | | December 31, 2016 | |
| Beginning Balance | | $ | 3,996,810 | | | $ | 13,815,094 | |
| Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes, net of issuance discounts | | | 146,669 | | | | - | |
| Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes – related party | | | 237,000 | | | | | |
| Repayments | | | (100,000 | ) | | | - | |
| Conversion of notes payable into common stock | | | (3,712,638 | ) | | | | |
| Conversion of notes payable into preferred stock | | | - | | | | (9,452,000 | ) |
| Conversion of related party notes payable into preferred stock | | | - | | | | (230,763 | ) |
| Settlement agreements | | | - | | | | (145,945 | ) |
| Amortization of discounts | | | 33,735 | | | | 10,424 | |
| Ending Balance | | $ | 601,576 | | | $ | 3,996,810 | |
| Convertible notes, short term | | $ | 1,150,000 | | | $ | - | |
| Convertible notes, short term – related party | | $ | 521,172 | | | $ | 284,172 | |
| convertible notes, long term – related party | | $ | - | | | $ | 3,712,638 | |
| Debt discounts | | $ | 1,069,596 | | | $ | - | |
NOTE 67 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating Leases
The Company leases approximately 6,8187,579 square feet of office space under a 6462 month operating lease which expires during April 2020.2023. The amounts reflected in the table below are for the aggregate future minimum lease payments under the non-cancelable facility operating leases. Under lease agreements that contain escalating rent provisions, lease expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company leases office space under a 23 month operating lease which expires during August 2019. The amounts reflected in the table below are for the aggregate future minimum lease payments under the non-cancelable facility operating leases. Under lease agreements that contain escalating rent provisions, lease expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company also leases approximately 202 square feet of office space under a 12 month operating lease expiringwhich originally expired in 2016. The lease was renewed and is renewable at the Company's option annually at a flat monthly amount of $400. The amounts reflected in the table below are for the aggregate future minimum lease payments under the non-cancelable facility operating leases.
Rent expense was $225,840$186,640 and $235,166$225,840 for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively.
As of December 31, 2016,2017, future minimum lease payments are as follows:
Year Ending December 31, | | | | | | |
| 2017 | | $ | 175,041 | | |
| 2018 | | | 177,950 | | | $ | 281,646 | |
| 2019 | | | 183,609 | | | | 259,851 | |
| 2020 | | | 78,612 | | | | 209,559 | |
| 2021 | | | | 214,107 | |
| 2022 | | | | 218,654 | |
| 2023 and thereafter | | | | 18,569 | |
| Total minimum lease payments | | $ | 615,212 | | | $ | 1,202,386 | |
On August 1, 2017, the Company entered into a 36 month lease of computer equipment. The lease carries a monthly payment of $2,871 with the option to purchase the equipment at its fair market value at the end of the lease.
Restricted Stock Commitments
The Company has committed to settling a significant portion of its current accounts payable and wages payable balances through the future issuance of restricted stock units. While the terms of these agreements have not yet been formalized with employees and outside contractors, they could have a potentially dilutive effect to current shareholders.
Contingent Liability
On October 15, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with a consultant by which the consultant's invoices for the previous four months would be accrued as a liability to be paid out upon (a) the Company's successful raising of $10,000,000 in capital funding, or (b) the Company reaching total revenues of $10,000,000. The Company has a balance due under this agreement of $37,500 atDecember 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
Legal Proceedings
On October 14, 2015, Gregory Clarke Chapman ("Plaintiff") instituted a legal action in Virginia against the Company alleging that, among other things, the Company was indebted to the Plaintiff for certain sums of money totaling $816,291, and seeking declaratory judgment with respect to Incentive Stock Options, Warrants, and attorney's fees. On November 2, 2016, without admitting any wrongdoing, the Company and the Plaintiff agreed to settle this matter by entering into a definitive settlement agreement in which the Company has agreed to (i) pay the Plaintiff the sum of $138,500 as reimbursement of legal fees and consulting income, and (ii) issue a zero-interest bearing note payable to the Plaintiff in the amount of $600,000 to be paid in 36 equal monthly payments beginning January 1, 2017 (see Note 4 – Notes Payable). So long as payments are made timely per the prescribed schedule, all additional amounts sought by the Plaintiff will be waived.
On October 14, 2015, Timothy F. Kelleher ("Plaintiff") instituted a legal action in Virginia against the Company alleging that, among other things, the Company was indebted to the Plaintiff for certain sums of money totaling $806,674, and seeking declaratory judgment with respect to Incentive Stock Options and attorney's fees. On November 2, 2016, without admitting any wrongdoing, the Company and the Plaintiff agreed to settle this matter by entering into a definitive settlement agreement in which the Company has agreed to (i) pay the Plaintiff the sum of $173,000 as reimbursement of legal fees and consulting income, and (ii) issue a zero-interest bearing note payable to the Plaintiff in the amount of $600,000 to be paid in 36 equal monthly payments beginning January 1, 2017 (see Note 4 – Notes Payable). So long as payments are made timely per the prescribed schedule, all additional amounts sought by the Plaintiff will be waived.
On December 2, 2016, AltEnergy Cyber, LLC ("Plaintiff") instituted a legal action in Connecticut against the Company and Robert Zahm. The complaint alleged that (i) the companyCompany improperly extended the maturity date of the Plaintiff's convertible note in the amount of $1,500,000 and (ii) improperly converted the loan into the Company's stock. The Complaint alleges that the Company is liable to the Plaintiff for the $4,500,000 plus interest. The Company believes this claim to be without merit, and intends to vigorously defend itself against it.This litigation is still ongoing. During the year ended December 31, 2017, Robert Zahm was dismissed from the proceedings for lack of personal jurisdiction. On March 29, 2018, the AltEnergy Cyber, LLC's legal action was dismissed through a motion for summary judgement.
NOTE 78 ‑ RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
During the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company incurred interest expense on notes to related parties in the aggregate amount of $649,362$604,145 and $561,693,649,362, respectively (see Note 6 – Convertible Notes).
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, we were indebted to John Hayes, an officer and significant stockholder of the Company, in the aggregate principal amount of $338,000 and $3,813,638, respectively, pursuant to demand notes bearing interest at 12% per annum.
During the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,2017, the Company incurred professional expenses in the amount of $150,000 pursuant$90,000, which was paid through the issuance of 150,000 shares of restricted stock, to Robert Lentz, a consulting contract withdirector, for services related to business development activities performed that were outside the scope of his board position.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued Robert Lentz, a business owned by Jay Wright,director, 142,740 shares of the Company's Corporate Counsel and Secretary. Unpaid amounts due under this contract are includedcommon stock valued at $71,370, or $0.50 per share as payment for board duties performed in Jay Wright's payable balancesa previous year.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred professional expenses in the table below.amount of $59,000, which was paid through the issuance of 98,334 shares of restricted stock, to J. Allen Kosowsky, a director, for services related to consulting activities performed that were outside the scope of his board position.
Between February 9, 2017 and March 2, 2017, the Company issued warrants to purchase 83,334 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.60 to John Hayes, an executive officer and significant shareholder, in conjunction with short term advances extended to the Company The warrants were valued at $15,504 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded to additional paid in capital.
On March 6, 2017, the Company issued warrants to purchase 83,334 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.60 to Thomas Bruderman, director, in conjunction with short term advances extended to the Company. The warrants were valued at $12,441 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded to additional paid in capital.
On August 29, 2017, the Company issued 44,445 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 44,445 shares of common stock at a price per share of $0.60 to J. Allen Kosowsky, a director, for gross proceeds of $20,000 or $0.45 per share. The terms of this issuance were the same as terms offered to non-related parties during the same time period.
On August 29, 2017, the Company issued 70,000 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 70,000 shares of common stock at a price per share of $0.60 to Thomas Bruderman, a director, for gross proceeds of $35,000 or $0.45 per share. The terms of this issuance were the same as terms offered to non-related parties during the same time period.
Accounts payable related party
At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,December 31, 2016, the Company had a balance in related party accounts payable of $68,060 and $709,725, respectively, which consisted of $819,725the following:
| | | | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| Party Name: | Relationship: | Nature of transactions: | | 2017 | | | 2016 | |
| Jay Wright | Corporate Counsel | Consulting fees | | $ | - | | | $ | 355,795 | |
| John Hayes | Chief Technology Officer | Expense reimbursement | | | 55,254 | | | | 308,485 | |
| Robert Graham | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | Expense reimbursement | | | 6,806 | | | | 45,445 | |
| Robert Graham | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | Rent | | | 6,000 | | | | - | |
| | | | | $ | 68,060 | | | $ | 709,725 | |
Advances related party
At December 31, 2017 and $549,236,December 31, 2016, the Company had a balance in related party advances of $65,000 and $110,000, respectively, which consisted of the following:
| | | | | December 31, | | | December 31, | |
| Party Name: | Relationship: | Nature of transactions: | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | Relationship: | | 2017 | | | 2016 | |
| Jay Wright | Corporate Counsel and Secretary | Consulting fees | | $ | 355,795 | | | $ | 227,298 | | |
| John Hayes | Chief Technology Officer | Advance | | | 110,000 | | | | 110,000 | | Chief Technology Officer | | $ | - | | | $ | 110,000 | |
| John Hayes | Chief Technology Officer | Expense reimbursement | | | 308,485 | | | | 193,995 | | |
| Robert Graham | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer | Expense reimbursement | | | 45,445 | | | | 17,493 | | |
| Thomas Bruderman | | Director and significant shareholder | | | 65,000 | | | | - | |
| | | | | $ | 819,725 | | | $ | 549,236 | | | | $ | 65,000 | | | $ | 110,000 | |
NOTE
89 ‑ STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The Company has authorized 90200 million shares of common stock, $0.001$0.0001 par value, and 5010 million shares of preferred stock, each with $0.001$0.0001 par value.
Each share of the Company's preferred stock is convertible into 10 shares of common stock, subject to adjustment, has voting rights equal to its common stock equivalent, 7% cumulative dividend rights, and has liquidation rights that entitle the recipient to the receipt of net assets on a pro-rata basis. The Company has 77,047,671 and 13,325,681 common shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015,3,639,783 and 36,712,907 and 98,0403,671,316 preferred shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
On February 22, 2017, we completed the actions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreement (see note 11 – Business Acquisitions/Dispositions) and
2015, respectively.merged with and into BlackRidge with BlackRidge continuing as the surviving corporation. Upon completion of the Agreement, the Company issued 3,783,791 shares of its newly designated Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares of common stock to the stockholders of BlackRidge in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock and Common Stock of BlackRidge. Because BlackRidge continues as the surviving entity, the net effect from this transaction on the outstanding stock of the Company was the addition of 8,965,000 shares of common stock held by the investors of the Company at the time of the acquisition.
Between January 13, 2017 and February 27, 2017, the Company issued 62,502 shares of the Company's preferred stock along with 5 year warrants to purchase 625,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.70 to several investors for aggregate proceeds of $375,000, or $0.60 per share. The warrants were valued at $104,765 using the Black-Scholes pricing model.
Between February 27, 2017 and August 29, 2017, the Company issued 10,364,121 shares of the Company's common stock and 5 year warrants to purchase 6,755,291 shares of the Company's common stock at an average exercise price per share of $0.51 to several investors for aggregate proceeds of $4,666,453. The warrants were valued at $1,248,536 using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The Company paid consultant and business development fees of $89,000 related to these issuances.
On February 2, 2017, the Company issued warrants to purchase 166,667 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of $0.60 per share in conjunction with a debt agreement. The warrants were valued at $31,002 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded as a discount to the debt agreement.
Between February 9, 2017 and March 6, 2017, the Company issued warrants to purchase 150,001 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.60 to several parties in conjunction with short term notes and advances. The warrants were valued at $27,945 using the Black-Scholes pricing model and were recorded to additional paid in capital.
On March 31, 2017, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock in connection with the exercise of a warrant to purchase shares at $0.01 per share. The Company received $10,000 in proceeds for the warrant exercise.
Between August 23, 201629, 2017 and December 22, 2016,November 16, 2017, the Company converted an aggregate 144,035 shares of the Company's preferred stock into 1,568,862 shares of the Company's common stock after receiving conversion exercises from preferred stockholders.
Between August 31, 2017 and September 25, 2017, the Company issued 6,089,2197,700,000 shares of its preferredthe Company's common stock at $0.60 per share for aggregate gross proceedsand 5 year warrants to purchase 7,700,000 shares of 3,131,004. Each share of preferred stock is entitled to preferential liquidation status, one vote per share, and is convertible into one share ofthe Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.50 to several investors for aggregate proceeds of $3,850,000. The warrants were valued at $1,800,288 using the holder's request.Black-Scholes pricing model.
On November 15, 2016,September 11, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate 30,525,64822,064,105 shares of its preferredthe Company's common stock to satisfy $13,238,453 in wages payable at a per share price of $0.60. The stock contains a 10 month restriction on transfers and/or sales.
Between September 11, 2017 and September 27, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate 462,740 shares of the Company's common stock as settlement of contracts valued at $231,370 at a per share price of $0.50.
On October 31, 2017, the Company issued 55,556 shares of the Company's common stock in connection with the exercise of a warrant to purchase shares at $0.60 per share. The Company received $33,334 in proceeds for the warrant exercise.
On November 9, 2017, the Company issued 10,757,254 shares of the Company's common stock for the conversion of $14,049,474 in notesa note payable and accrued interest. Each shareinterest totaling $5,378,628. The Company also issued 5 year warrants to purchase an additional 5,378,627 shares of preferred stock is entitled to preferential liquidation status, one vote per share, and is convertible into one share ofthe Company's common stock at a price of $0.50. These warrants were valued at $913,238 which was recorded as a loss on extinguishment of debt.
On November 9, 2017, the holder's request.Company issued an aggregate 388,726 shares of the Company's common stock to satisfy $233,235 in accrued accounts payable at a per share price of $0.60. The stock contains a 10 month restriction on transfers and/or sales.
On October 1, 2017, the Company issued 50,000 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $22,500 or $0.45 per share, along with warrants to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at a price of $0.60 per share pursuant to a consulting contract.
Between December 1, 2017 and December 17, 2017, the Company issued an aggregate 610,126 shares of the company's common stock valued at $438,500 or an average of $0.72 pursuant to several consulting contracts.
On December 15, 2017, the Company issued 225,000 shares of the Company's common stock and 5 year warrants to purchase 56,250 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price per share of $0.32 to an investor for aggregate proceeds of $90,000. The warrants were valued at $8,365 using the Black-Scholes pricing model.
The significant assumptions used in the Black-Scholes valuation of the warrants are as follows:
| Stock price on the valuation date | | $ | 0.32 – 0.50 | |
| Warrant exercise price | | $ | 0.10 - 0.70 | |
| Dividend yield | | | 0.00 | % |
| Years to maturity | | | 5.0 | |
| Risk free rate | | | 1.50 – 2.16 | % |
| Expected volatility | | | 51.35 - 55.43 | % |
NOTE 9 ‑10 – SHARE BASED COMPENSATION
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company issued 5,570,000 5 year options to purchase common stock to employees and directors under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan. The options were valued at $1,557,089 using the Black-Scholes pricing model. As of December 31, 2017, the total unrecognized expense for unvested share based compensation is $1,446,989. The 2017 Stock Incentive Plan allows for a maximum 25,000,000 shares to be issued, of which 19,430,000 shares remain available for issuance as of December 31, 2017.
The activity of options granted to during the year ended December 31, 2017 is as follows:
| | | Employee and Director Options Outstanding | | | Weighted Average Exercise Price | | Weighted Average Remaining Life | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value | |
| Beginning Balance – December 31, 2016 | | | - | | | | | | | | |
| Granted | | | 5,570,000 | | | $ | 0.60 | | 5 years | | $ | 0.28 | |
| Exercised | | | - | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cancelled | | | - | | | | | | | | | | |
| Ending Balance – December 31, 2017 | | | 5,570,000 | | | $ | 0.60 | | 4.65 years | | $ | 0.28 | |
| Exercisable options | | | 392,958 | | | $ | 0.60 | | 4.65 years | | $ | 0.28 | |
The Company's outstanding employee options at December 31, 2017 are as follows:
| Options Outstanding | | Option Exercisable | |
Exercise Price Range
| | Number
Outstanding | | Weighted Average
Remaining
Contractual Life (in
years) | | Weighted Average
Exercise Price | | Number
Exercisable | | Weighted
Average
Exercise Price | | Intrinsic Value | |
| $ | 0.60 | | | | 5,177,042 | | | | 4.65 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | | 392,958 | | | $ | 0.60 | | | | 19,648 | |
The weighted average fair value per option issued during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $0.28.
NOTE 11 – BUSINESS ACQUISITION
On September 6, 2016, the Company and BlackRidge entered into an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the "Reorganization Agreement") originally dated as of September 6, 2016, and amended on February 22, 2017 to update the number of common shares, warrants, and options granted and outstanding as of the closing date.
On February 22, 2017, we completed the actions contemplated by the Reorganization Agreement and merged with and into BlackRidge with BlackRidge continuing as the surviving corporation ("Reorganization"). Upon completion of the Agreement, we issued 3,783,791 shares of our newly designated Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares of Common Stock to the stockholders of BlackRidge in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock and Common Stock of BlackRidge. Additionally, certain stockholders of BlackRidge returned for cancellation a total of 16,284,330 shares of our Common Stock. Upon the completion of the Reorganization, BlackRidge became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and the Company had a total of 3,783,791 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 21,790,683 shares of Common Stock outstanding, with the former BlackRidge stockholders owning 3,783,791 shares or 100% of Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares or approximately 58.9% of Common Stock. Upon completion of the Reorganization, we also had outstanding warrants entitling the holders to acquire a total of 18,541,579 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an average exercise price of $0.46 per share. The Reorganization resulted in a change of control of the Company. For accounting purposes, BlackRidge was treated as the acquirer and the historical financial statements of BlackRidge became the Company's historical financial statements. The acquisition is intended to constitute a tax-free reorganization pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
NOTE 12 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
On March 31, 2017, the Company completed the sale of substantially all the assets, other than cash, used in or connection with the Company's home grain mill and kitchen mixer business to John Hofman and Bruce Crane, former officers and directors of the Company, in consideration for the assumption by such persons of substantially all the liabilities incurred by the Company in connection with such business. The assets divested consisted of the non-cybersecurity assets of the Company and included accounts receivable, inventory, deposits, property and equipment and intangible assets. The liabilities divested included the non-cybersecurity liabilities of the Company and included accounts payable and accrued expenses and long and short-term notes payable and accrued interest thereon. Upon completion of the divestiture, the Company recognized a $484,927 loss on disposal. Additionally, during the period from February 22, 2017 through March 31, 2017, the Company incurred a loss from discontinued operations of $8,737.
The following table shows the value of assets and liabilities divested:
| Assets | | | |
| Accounts receivable | | $ | 40,044 | |
| Deposits and prepaid expenses | | | 90,559 | |
| Inventory | | | 1,157,555 | |
| Property and equipment | | | 117,254 | |
| Intangible assets | | | 62,820 | |
| Total Assets | | | 1,468,232 | |
| | | | | |
| Liabilities | | | | |
| Accounts payable and accrued expenses | | | 692,399 | |
| Notes payable – short term | | | 64,000 | |
| Notes payable – short term, related party | | | 91,679 | |
| Line of credit | | | 135,227 | |
| Total Liabilities | | | 983,305 | |
| | | | | |
| Loss on disposal | | $ | 484,927 | |
NOTE 13 – INCOME TAXES
Income taxes are provided for the tax effects of transactions reported in the financial statements and consist of taxes currently due. Deferred taxes relate to differences between the basis of assets and liabilities for financial and income tax reporting which will be either taxable or deductible when the assets or liabilities are recovered or settled.
At December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company had net operating loss ("NOL") carry-forwards for federal income purposes approximating $34,394,555 and $30,340,393 respectively. At December 31, 2017 and $23,895,458,2016, the Company had net operating loss ("NOL") carry-forwards for state income purposes approximating $26,508,562 and $7,798,749 respectively. These losses are available for future years and expire through 2036.
The deferred tax asset at December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 is summarized as follows:
| | | December 31, 2016 | | | December 31, 2015 | | | December 31, 2017 | | | December 31, 2016 | |
| Net operating loss carry forwards | | $ | 10,315,734 | | | $ | 8,124,456 | | |
| Net operating loss & credit carry forwards | | | $ | 7,897,392 | | | $ | 10,315,734 | |
| Inventory obsolescence reserve | | | 117,616 | | | | 117,616 | | | | 77,993 | | | | 117,616 | |
| Accrued wages, related party | | | 867,078 | | | | 436,700 | | | | 1,216,954 | | | | 867,078 | |
| Accrued interest – convertible debt, related party | | | 438,606 | | | | 607,132 | | | | 290,845 | | | | 438,606 | |
| Depreciation and amortization | | | 3,687 | | | | 3,438 | | | | (125,749 | ) | | | 3,687 | |
| Other tax adjustments | | | 4,527 | | | | 4,527 | | | | 3,566 | | | | 4,527 | |
| Deferred Revenue | | | | (4,626 | ) | | | - | |
| Valuation allowance | | | (11,747,248 | ) | | | (9,293,869 | ) | | | (9,356,375 | ) | | | (11,747,248 | ) |
| | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
The Company has taken a 100% valuation allowance against the deferred asset attributable to the NOL carry-forwards and other temporary differences of approximately $11,747,248$9,356,375 and $9,293,869$11,747,248 at December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, due to the uncertainty of realizing the future tax benefits. The increasesdecrease and increase in valuation allowanceallowances for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 20152016 of approximately $2,453,379($2,390,872) and $2,404,868, respectively, are primarily attributable to the Company's net operating loss during the years then ended.ended, true ups for state NOLs and credit carryforwards, and then the rate change associated with Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
The following table displays a reconciliation from the U.S. statutory rate to the effective tax rate and the provision for (benefit from) income taxes for the years ended December 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively:
| | | 2016 | | | 2015 | | | 2017 | | | 2016 | |
| Tax (benefit) at the US statutory rate of 34% | | $ | (2,453,379 | ) | | $ | (2,404,868 | ) | |
| Tax (benefit) at the US statutory rate of 22% | | | $ | 2,390,872 | | | $ | (2,453,379 | ) |
| Change in valuation allowance | | | 2,453,379 | | | | 2,404,868 | | | | (2,390,872 | ) | | | 2,453,379 | |
| | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | | | $ | - | |
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740, "Income Taxes." This standard requires the Company to provide a net deferred tax asset or liability equal to the expected future tax benefit or expense of temporary reporting differences between book and tax accounting and any available operating loss or tax credit carryforwards.
The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. During the years ended December 31,
20162017 and
2015,2016, the Company recognized no interest and penalties. The Company had no accruals for interest and penalties at December 31,
20162017 and
2015.2016.
The tax years 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, and 20132014 remain open to examination for federal income tax purposes and by the other major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.
NOTE 1014 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
We have evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when our financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. Management has determined that other than as disclosed below, there were no additional reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.
Debt IssuancesEquity
On February 2,2017,January 3, 2018, the Company issued an aggregate 547,000 shares of the Company's common stock valued at $333,670 or $0.61 per share in conjunction with a consulting contracts.
Notes Payable
On January 31, 2018, the Company issued a $100,000 convertible note bearing interest at 10%8% per annum. The note matures on MarchJanuary 31, 20182019 and is convertible into the Company's Series B Preferred Shares at a price of $0.66$0.32 per share at the holder's request. The notenoteholder was repaid in full on April 4, 2017 along with $1,785 in accrued interest.
Equity Issuances
Between January 13, 2017 and February 27, 2017, the Company issued 625,000 shares of the Company's preferred stock along withalso granted detachable 5 year warrants to purchase 601,191an aggregate of 312,500 shares of the company's common stock at an average exercise price per share of $0.62 to several investors for aggregate proceeds of $375,000 or $0.60$0.32 per share.
Between February 27, 2017 and MarchOn January 31, 2017,2018, the Company issued 6,214,606 shares ofa $500,000 convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum. The note matures on January 31, 2019 and is convertible into the Company's common stock andSeries B Preferred Shares at a price of $0.32 per share at the holder's request. The noteholder was also granted detachable 5 year warrants to purchase 4,660,955an aggregate of 1,562,500 shares of the Company'scompany's common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share of $0.60 to several investors for aggregate proceeds of $2,796,573.share.
BetweenOn February 2, 2017 and March 6, 2017,23, 2018, the Company issued a $1,000,000 convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum. The note matures on February 28, 2019 and is convertible into the Company's Series B Preferred Shares at a price of $0.32 per share at the holder's request. The noteholder was also granted detachable 5 year warrants to purchase 316,667an aggregate of 3,125,000 shares of the Company'scompany's common stock at an exercise price of $0.32 per share of $0.60 to several parties in conjunction with short term Financing.
Material Agreement
On September 6, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement and plan of reorganization with Grote Molen, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and Grote Merger Co.(together "Grote"), a Delaware corporation providing for Grote's acquisition of the Company in exchange for a controlling number of shares of the Grote's preferred and common stock pursuant to the merger of Grote Merger Co. with and into BlackRidge, with Blackridge continuing as the surviving corporation.share.
On February 22, 2017 (the "Closing Date"), we completed27, 2018, the actions contemplated byCompany issued a $1,000,000 convertible note bearing interest at 8% per annum. The note matures on February 28, 2019 and is convertible into the Reorganization Agreement and merged with and into Grote with BlackRidge continuing asCompany's Series B Preferred Shares at a price of $0.32 per share at the surviving corporation. Upon completionholder's request. The noteholder was also granted detachable 5 year warrants to purchase an aggregate of the Agreement, Grote issued 3,783,791 shares of their newly designated Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares of Common Stock to the stockholders of BlackRidge in exchange for all the issued and outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock and Common Stock of BlackRidge. Additionally, certain stockholders of Grote returned for cancellation a total of 16,284,330 shares of Common Stock. Upon the completion of the Reorganization, BlackRidge became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Grote and had a total of 3,783,791 shares of Series A Preferred Stock and 21,790,683 shares of Common Stock outstanding, with the former BlackRidge stockholders owning 3,783,791 shares or 100% of Series A Preferred Stock and 12,825,683 shares or approximately 58.9% of Common Stock. The Reorganization resulted in a change of control of Grote. For accounting purposes, BlackRidge will be treated as the acquirer and the historical financial statements of BlackRidge will become Grote's historical financial statements. The acquisition is intended to constitute a tax-free reorganization pursuant to the applicable provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
On February 22, 2017, Grote Molen, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company" or the "Registrant"), Grote Merger Co., a Delaware corporation ("Merger Corp.") and BlackRidge Technology Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("BlackRidge") completed an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization (the " Reorganization Agreement"), providing for the Registrant's acquisition of BlackRidge in exchange for a controlling number of3,125,000 shares of the Registrant's preferred andcompany's common stock pursuant to the mergerat an exercise price of Merger Corp. with and into BlackRidge, with Blackridge continuing as the surviving corporation.$0.32 per share.
We are presentingLegal proceedings
On March 29, 2018, AltEnergy Cyber, LLC's legal action against the historical financial statements of the Company as well as BlackRidgecompany was dismissed through a motion for the years ended December 31, 2016 as part of this pro-forma disclosure. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 reflects the acquisition and related events as if they had been consummated on that date. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016 reflects the acquisition and related events as if they had been consummated on January 1, 2016.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended have been prepared based on certain pro forma adjustments to our historical financial statements as set forth in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such historical financial statements and related notes contained in those reports. The historical financial statements for BlackRidge were derived from the audited financial statements for BlackRidge as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes and with the historical financial statements and related notes thereto.
In the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements, the acquisition is accounted for as a reverse acquisition using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") No. 805 Business Combinations.
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not include the effects of costs associated with any restructuring or integration activities resulting from the transaction, as they are non-recurring in nature and not factually supportable at the time that the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements were prepared. In addition, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not include the realization of any cost savings from operating efficiencies or synergies resulting from the transaction, nor do they include any potential incremental revenues and earnings that may be achieved with the combined capabilities of the companies.
These unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are presented for illustrative purposes only, and the pro forma adjustments are based on estimated fair value of the net assets acquired. Such information is not necessarily indicative of the operating results or financial position that would have occurred had the acquisition been completed at the dates indicated or what results would be for any future periods.
Grote Molen, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
December 31, 2016
| | | | | | | | | Combined | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | BlackRidge | | | Before Pro | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | Technology | | | Forma | | | Pro Forma | | | | Grote Molen, Inc | |
| | | Grote Molen, Inc | | | Holdings, Inc | | | Adjustments | | | Adjustments | | | | Pro Forma | |
Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current Assets: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 111,565 | | | $ | 57,033 | | | $ | 168,598 | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 168,598 | |
| Accounts receivable | | | 26,005 | | | | - | | | | 26,005 | | | | - | | | | | 26,005 | |
| Accounts receivable – related party | | | 11,905 | | | | - | | | | 11,905 | | | | - | | | | | 11,905 | |
| Inventory | | | 1,061,558 | | | | - | | | | 1,061,558 | | | | - | | | | | 1,061,558 | |
| Prepaid Expenses | | | 50,565 | | | | 100,954 | | | | 151,519 | | | | - | | | | | 151,519 | |
| Total current assets | | | 1,261,598 | | | | 157,987 | | | | 1,419,585 | | | | - | | | | | 1,419,585 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Property and equipment – net | | | 121,217 | | | | - | | | | 121,217 | | | | - | | | | | 121,217 | |
| Intangible assets - net | | | 62,820 | | | | 5,923,543 | | | | 5,986,363 | | | | - | | | | | 5,986,363 | |
| Total assets | | $ | 1,445,635 | | | $ | 6,081,530 | | | $ | 7,527,165 | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 7,527,165 | |
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Current Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Accounts payable | | $ | 411,841 | | | $ | 2,038,273 | | | $ | 2,450,114 | | | $ | - | | | | $ | 2,450,114 | |
| Accounts payable – related party | | | 14,250 | | | | 819,725 | | | | 833,975 | | | | - | | | | | 833,975 | |
| Accrued interest | | | 19,502 | | | | 52,888 | | | | 72,390 | | | | - | | | | | 72,390 | |
| Accrued interest – related party | | | 42,240 | | | | 1,241,911 | | | | 1,284,151 | | | | - | | | | | 1,284,151 | |
| Wages payable | | | - | | | | 10,696,311 | | | | 10,696,311 | | | | - | | | | | 10,696,311 | |
| Deferred revenue | | | - | | | | 19,988 | | | | 19,988 | | | | - | | | | | 19,988 | |
| Notes payable | | | 179,879 | | | | 89,221 | | | | 269,100 | | | | - | | | | | 269,100 | |
| Notes payable – related party | | | 118,000 | | | | - | | | | 118,000 | | | | - | | | | | 118,000 | |
| Current portion of long term notes | | | - | | | | 400,000 | | | | 400,000 | | | | - | | | | | 400,000 | |
| Convertible notes – related party | | | - | | | | 284,172 | | | | 284,172 | | | | - | | | | | 284,172 | |
| Total Current Liabilities | | | 785,712 | | | | 15,642,489 | | | | 16,428,201 | | | | | | | | | 16,428,201 | |
| Long Term Liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Contingent liability | | | - | | | | 37,500 | | | | 37,500 | | | | - | | | | | 37,500 | |
| Notes payable, long term | | | - | | | | 800,000 | | | | 800,000 | | | | - | | | | | 800,000 | |
| Notes payable – related party | | | 139,603 | | | | 3,712,638 | | | | 3,852,241 | | | | - | | | | | 3,852,241 | |
| Total Liabilities | | | 925,315 | | | | 20,192,627 | | | | 21,117,942 | | | | - | | | | | 21,117,942 | |
| Stockholders' Equity (Deficit): | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Preferred stock | | | - | | | | 36,713 | | | | 36,713 | | | | (33,042 | ) | (a) | | | 3,671 | |
| Common stock, par value | | | 24,899 | | | | 13,326 | | | | 38,225 | | | | (16,284 | ) | (b) | | | 21,941 | |
| Additional paid-in capital | | | 465,469 | | | | 20,254,596 | | | | 20,720,065 | | | | 33,042 | | (a) | | | 20,799,343 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 16,284 | | (b) | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 29,952 | | (c) | | | | |
| Accumulated earnings deficit | | | 29,952 | | | | (34,550,732 | ) | | | (34,520,780 | ) | | | (29,952 | ) | (c) | | | (34,550,732 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Subscriptions payable | | | - | | | | 135,000 | | | | 135,000 | | | | - | | | | | | 135,000 | |
| Total Stockholders' Equity | | | 469,093 | | | | 6,081,530 | | | | (13,590,777 | ) | | | - | | | | | | (13,590,777 | ) |
| Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) | | $ | 1,258,892 | | | $ | 5,669,549 | | | $ | 7,527,165 | | | $ | - | | | | | $ | 7,527,165 | |
Grote Molen, Inc.
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2016
| | | | | | | | | Combined | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Before Pro | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | BlackRidge | | | Forma | | | Pro Forma | | | Grote Molen, Inc | |
| | | Grote Molen, Inc | | | Technology Holdings, Inc | | | Adjustments | | | Adjustments | | | Pro Forma | |
| Revenue | | $ | 962,782 | | | $ | 84,023 | | | $ | 1,046,805 | | | $ | - | | | $ | 1,046,805 | |
| Revenue – related party | | | 43,664 | | | | - | | | | 43,664 | | | | - | | | | 43,664 | |
| Cost of goods sold | | | 712,517 | | | | - | | | | 712,517 | | | | - | | | | 712,517 | |
| Cost of goods sold – related party | | | 32,314 | | | | - | | | | 32,314 | | | | - | | | | 32,314 | |
| Gross profit | | | 261,615 | | | | 84,023 | | | | 345,638 | | | | - | | | | 345,638 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| General and administrative | | | 488,854 | | | | 5,235,260 | | | | 5,724,114 | | | | - | | | | 5,724,114 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Loss from operations | | | (227,239 | ) | | | (5,151,237 | ) | | | (5,378,476 | ) | | | - | | | | (5,378,476 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net operating Loss | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Other income (expense) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest income | | | - | | | | 205 | | | | 205 | | | | - | | | | 205 | |
| Interest expense | | | (18,051 | ) | | | (1,415,426 | ) | | | (1,433,477 | ) | | | - | | | | (1,433,477 | ) |
| Interest expense – related party | | | (16,197 | ) | | | (649,362 | ) | | | (665,559 | ) | | | - | | | | (665,559 | ) |
| Gain on sale of property and equipment | | | 2,072 | | | | - | | | | 2,072 | | | | | | | | 2,072 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss from operations | | | (259,415 | ) | | | (7,215,820 | ) | | | (7,475,235 | ) | | | - | | | | (7,475,235 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Income Tax | | | (32 | ) | | | - | | | | (32 | ) | | | - | | | | (32 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Loss | | $ | (259,447 | ) | | $ | (7,215,820 | ) | | $ | (7,475,267 | ) | | $ | - | | | $ | (7,475,267 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net loss per share – basic and diluted | | | (0.01 | ) | | | (0.54 | ) | | | (0.21 | ) | | | | | | | (0.38 | ) |
| Weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period – basic and diluted | | | 22,746,068 | | | | 13,325,681 | | | | 36,071,749 | | | | (16,284,330 | )(c) | | | 19,787,419 | |
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared assuming that the acquisition is accounted for using the reverse acquisition method of accounting. Accordingly, the assets acquired and liabilities assumed of the Seller are recorded at their historical book value.
NOTE 3 - PRO FORMA PRESENTATION ADJUSTMENTS AND ASSUMPTIONS
The adjustments includedsummary judgement in the column under the heading "Pro Forma Adjustments" in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are as follows:Connecticut Superior Court.
Pro Forma Adjustments to the Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
| (a) | To record the 10 for 1 exchange of outstanding BlackRidge preferred stock for Grote Molen preferred stock upon the completion of the acquisition. |
| (b) | To record the cancellation of an aggregate 16,284,330 shares of Grote Molen common stock attributable to the acquisition agreement. |
| (c) | To record the cancellation of Grote Molen's retained earnings from its balance sheet due to the reverse merger. |
Pro Forma Adjustments to the Condensed Combined Statements of Operations
| (c) | To record the cancellation of an aggregate 16,284,330 shares of Grote Molen common stock attributable to the acquisition agreement. |
F - 3622