Item 6. SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected ~~income statement~~Statement of Operations and ~~balance sheet~~Balance Sheet data for the five fiscal years ended ~~January 28, 2006~~February 3, 2007 from the Company’s audited ~~consolidated financial statements. Each~~Consolidated Financial Statements. The fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 consisted of 53 weeks while all the other fiscal years of the Company presented consisted of 52 weeks. The information should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited ~~consolidated financial statements~~Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes and other financial information included herein, including Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.

Fiscal Year Ended

January 28,
2006

January 29,
2005

January 31,
2004

February 1,
2003

February 2,
2002

($ in thousands, except per share and store data)

INCOME STATEMENT DATA:

Sales

$
1, 238,486

$
1,365,133

$
1,330,626

$
1,281,869

$
1,388,032

Cost of sales

806,873

869,999

842,726

815,071

935,256

Gross profit

431,613

495,134

487,900

466,798

452,776

Selling, general and administrative expenses

426,854

450,162

459,441

465,893

422,737

Goodwill impairment charge (1)

—

—

—

40,914

—

Income (loss) from operations

4,759

44,972

28,459

(40,009
)
30,039

Interest expense

2,954

2,444

2,147

2,349

2,477

Other income

(2,171
)
(1,039
)
(718
)
(1,231
)
(2,120
)
Income (loss) before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

3,976

43,567

27,030

(41,127
)
29,682

Income tax expense (benefit)

1,090

4,892

8,302

(9,341
)
12,891

Income (loss) before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

2,886

38,675

18,728

(31,786
)
16,791

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill , net of income taxes (2)

—

3,166

4,339

—

—

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income taxes (3)(4)

(2,277
)
—

—

(13,684
)
—

Net income (loss)

$
2,922

$
41,841

$
23,067

$
(45,470
)
$
16,791

Basic earnings (loss) per share:

Earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
1.12

$
0.50

$
(0.79
)
$
0.40

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill

—

0.09

0.12

—

—

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

(0.07
)
—

—

(0.34
)
—

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$
0.02

$
1.21

$
0.62

$
(1.13
)
$
0.40

Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic

31,962

34,531

37,422

40,224

41,938

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:

Earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
1.06

$
0.49

$
(0.79
)
$
0.39

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill

—

0.09

0.11

—

—

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

(0.07
)
—

—

(0.34
)
—

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$
0.09

$
1.15

$
0.60

$
(1.13
)
$
0.39

Weighted average number of shares outstanding – diluted

32,124

36,297

38,209

40,224

42,553

Pro forma amounts assuming new accounting principle was applied retroactively:

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported

$
2,886

$
38,675

$
18,728

$
(31,786
)
$
16,791

Pro forma income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

2,922

38,946

18,533

(32,115
)
17,283

Pro forma net income

2,922

42,112

22,872

(45,799
)
17,283

Per share amounts:

Basic earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported

$
0.09

$
1.12

$
0.50

$
(0.79
)
$
0.40

Pro forma basic earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
1.13

$
0.50

$
(0.80
)
$
0.41

Pro forma basic earnings per share

$
0.09

$
1.22

$
0.61

$
(1.14
)
$
0.41

Diluted earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported

$
0.09

$
1.06

$
0.49

$
(0.79
)
$
0.39

Pro forma diluted earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
1.07

$
0.49

$
(0.80
)
$
0.40

Pro forma diluted earnings per share

$
0.09

$
1.16

$
0.60

$
(1.14
)
$
0.40


	Fiscal Year Ended

	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006			January 29, 2005			January 31, 2004			February 1, 2003

*STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:*	*($ in thousands, except per share and store data)*

Sales	$	1,471,157		$	1,238,486		$	1,365,133		$	1,330,626		$	1,281,869
Cost of sales		951,935			806,873			869,999			842,726			815,071

Gross profit		519,222			431,613			495,134			487,900			466,798
Selling, general and administrative expenses		519,246			426,854			450,162			459,441			465,893
Goodwill impairment charge ⁽¹⁾		—			—			—			—			40,914

(Loss) income from operations		(24	)		4,759			44,972			28,459			(40,009	)
Interest expense		5,504			2,954			2,444			2,147			2,349
Other income		(4,435	)		(2,171	)		(1,039	)		(718	)		(1,231	)

(Loss) income before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(1,093	)		3,976			43,567			27,030			(41,127	)
Income tax (benefit) expense		(2,041	)		1,090			4,892			8,302			(9,341	)

Income (loss) before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		948			2,886			38,675			18,728			(31,786	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes ^(2),(6)		10,721			—			3,166			4,339			—
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes ⁽³⁾⁽⁴⁾		—			(2,277	)		—			—			(13,684	)

Net income (loss)	$	11,669		$	609		$	41,841		$	23,067		$	(45,470	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.03		$	0.09		$	1.12		$	0.50		$	(0.79	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill		0.35			—			0.09			0.12			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			(0.07	)		—			—			(0.34	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.38		$	0.02		$	1.21		$	0.62		$	(1.13	)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic		30,797			31,962			34,531			37,422			40,224

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.03		$	0.09		$	1.06		$	0.49		$	(0.79	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill		0.33			—			0.09			0.11			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			(0.07	)		—			—			(0.34	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.36		$	0.02		$	1.15		$	0.60		$	(1.13	)

Weighted average number of shares outstanding – diluted		31,986			32,124			36,297			38,209			40,224


Proforma amounts assuming new accounting principles were applied retroactively:
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported	$	948		$	2,886		$	38,675		$	18,728		$	(31,786	)
Proforma income (loss) before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		948			2,922			38,946			18,533			(32,115	)
Pro forma net income		11,669			2,922			42,122			22,872			(45,799	)
Per share amounts:
Basic earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported	$	0.03		$	0.09		$	1.12		$	0.50		$	(0.79	)
Proforma basic earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.03		$	0.09		$	1.13		$	0.50		$	(0.80	)
Pro forma basic earnings per share	$	0.38		$	0.09		$	1.22		$	0.61		$	(1.14	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported	$	0.03		$	0.09		$	1.06		$	0.49		$	(0.79	)
Proforma diluted earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.03		$	0.09		$	1.07		$	0.49		$	(0.80	)
Pro forma diluted earnings per share	$	0.36		$	0.09		$	1.16		$	0.60		$	(1.14	)


	Fiscal Year Ended

	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006			January 29, 2005			January 31, 2004			February 1, 2003

	($ in thousands, except per share and store data)

*BALANCE SHEET DATA (at the end of the period):*

Total assets	$	829,690		$	799,657		$	859,653		$	817,758		$	803,396
Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations		3,393			3,659			780			395			1,640
Long-term obligations		16,085			19,474			12,037			7,465			7,860
Shareholders’ equity	$	393,205		$	378,512		$	404,323		$	399,184		$	392,104

*OPERATING DATA:*
Store count (open at end of period):
Mall stores		737			546			560			595			650
Freestanding stores		255			236			250			286			205
Total stores		992			782			810			881			855

Comparable store sales (decrease) / increase⁽⁵⁾		(6.2	%)		(5.7	%)		0.8	%		1.3	%		(5.0	%)

Total square footage (in thousands)		5,950			4,824			5,002			5,484			4,944


1.	The Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge in fiscal 2002 related to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

2.	The Company’s acquisition of substantially all of net assets of Wherehouse Entertainment Inc. and CD World Inc. stores in fiscal 2003 resulted in extraordinary gains recorded in 2003 and 2004 in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. The gains represent the excess of fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price of the acquired assets.

3.	The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB’s”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Statement No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor”, effective as of the beginning of 2002, resulting in a one-time, non-cash, after-tax charge of $13.7 million, which was classified as a “cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle” in 2002.

4.	The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143”, effective January 28, 2006 resulting in a one-time, non-cash, after tax charge of $2.3 million, which was classified as a “cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle” in 2005. For additional discussion regarding the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle, refer to Note 2 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

5.	A store is included in comparable store sales calculations at the beginning of its thirteenth full month of operation. Mall stores relocated in the same shopping center after being open for at least thirteen months are considered comparable stores. Closed stores that were open for at least thirteen months are included in comparable store sales through the month immediately preceding the month of closing.

6.	The Company’s acquisition of substantially all of the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. stores in fiscal 2006 resulted in an extraordinary gain recorded in 2006 in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. The gain represents the excess of fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price of the acquired assets. For additional discussion regarding the extraordinary gain, refer to Note 3 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Fiscal Year Ended

January 28,
2006

January 29,
2005

January 31,
2004

February 1,
2003

February 2,
2002

($ in thousands, except per share and store data)

BALANCE SHEET DATA: (at the end of the period)

Total assets

$
800,323

$
859,653

$
817,758

$
803,396

$
935,418

Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations

3,659

780

395

1,640

4,711

Long-term obligations

19,474

12,037

7,465

7,860

9,500

Shareholders’ equity

$
378,512

$
404,323

$
399,184

$
392,104

$
448,066

OPERATING DATA:

Store count (open at end of period):

Mall stores

546

560

595

650

686

Freestanding stores

236

250

286

205

216

Total stores

782

810

881

855

902

Comparable store sales increase/(decrease) (5)

(5.7
)%
0.8
%
1.3
%
(5.0
)%
(2.7
)%

Total square footage (in thousands)

4,824

5,002

5,484

4,944

5,076

~~(1)~~~~The Company recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment charge in fiscal 2002 related to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” concerning the accounting for goodwill.~~

~~(2)~~The Company’s acquisition of the net assets of Wherehouse Entertainment Inc. and CD World Inc. stores in fiscal 2003 resulted in extraordinary gains recorded in 2003 and 2004 in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” . The gain represents the excess of fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price of the acquired assets. For additional discussion regarding the extraordinary gain, refer to Note 3 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~(3)~~The Company adopted guidance relating to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB’s”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Statement No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor”, effective as of the beginning of 2002, resulting in a one-time, non-cash, after-tax charge of $13.7 million, which was classified as a “cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle” in 2002.

~~(4)~~The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 47, “Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143”, effective January 28, 2006 resulting in a one-time, non-cash, after tax charge of $2.3 million, which was classified as a “cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle” in 2005. For additional discussion regarding the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle, refer to Note 2 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~(5)~~A store is included in comparable store sales calculations at the beginning of its thirteenth full month of operation. Mall stores relocated in the same shopping center after being open for at least thirteen months are considered comparable stores. Closed stores that were open for at least thirteen months are included in comparable store sales through the month immediately preceding the month of closing.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations provides information that the Company’s management believes necessary to achieve an understanding of its financial condition and results of operations. To the extent that such analysis contains statements which are not of a historical nature, such statements are forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. These risks include, but are not limited to, changes in the competitive environment for the Company’s merchandise, including the entry or exit of non-traditional retailers of the Company’s merchandise to or from its markets; releases by the music, ~~DVD,~~home video, and video ~~games~~game industries of an increased or decreased number of “hit releases”; general economic factors in markets where the Company’s merchandise is sold; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and the ~~consolidated financial statements~~Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

~~Subsequent to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 and effective~~In March, ~~27,~~ 2006, the Company acquired substantially all of the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. (“Musicland”). Musicland, an entertainment specialty retailer, ~~which operates~~operated retail stores and ~~Web sites~~websites under the names Sam Goody ~~(www.SamGoody.com)~~(samgoody.com), Suncoast Motion Picture Company ~~(www.Suncoast.com)~~(suncoast.com), On Cue and ~~www.MediaPlay.com,~~MediaPlay.com, and filed a voluntary petition to restructure under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in January 2006. See Note 133 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further detail.

OnIn March ~~16,~~ 2006, the Company acquired an 80% interest in Mix & Burn LLC, a company that ~~will be~~is fully consolidated for financial ~~reporting purposes.~~reporting. The Company has committed ~~a total~~ funding of $5.2 million, ~~over two years,~~ of which ~~$1.2~~$4.0 million was funded as of ~~March 25, 2006.~~

February 3, 2007.

At ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, the Company operated ~~782~~992 stores totaling approximately ~~4.8~~6.0 million square feet in ~~46 states,~~the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In the fiscal year ended February 3, 2007 (referred to herein as “2006”), the Company’s sales increased as compared to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006, (referred to herein as “2005”)~~, the Company’s sales decreased as compared to the fiscal year ended January 29, 2005, (referred to herein as “2004”)~~ as a result of ~~lower~~increased store count related to the Musicland acquisition, partially offset by a decrease in comparable ~~sales and from operating fewer stores during the year. Earnings~~store sales. Income before extraordinary items decreased in ~~2005~~2006 as ~~a result of lower~~greater overall sales and gross ~~margins,~~margin were not able to offset increased SG&A expenses associated with the higher average store count and integration costs associated with the Musicland acquisition. Comparable store sales decreased 6.2% during Fiscal 2006 as double digit comparable store sale declines in music were partially offset by ~~lower selling, general~~positive comparable store sales in home video, video games and ~~administrative expenses.~~

accessories and related products.

The Company focuses on the following areas in its effort to improve its business:

Developing its Brands – f.y.e. brand

The Company ~~strives to increase consumer awareness of its various branded stores and Internet sites. Particular attention~~ is ~~paid to its~~creating a recognized national ~~mall-based~~ brand ~~f.y.e~~under the name f.y.e. (“For Your Entertainment”)~~, since its launch in 2001.~~. The ~~f.y.e~~f.y.e. brand initiative is aimed at broadening the Company’s customer base by creating a more relevant entertainment shopping experience and differentiating ~~f.y.e~~f.y.e. from its competition. It is centered on an engaging and personalized approach in marketing and merchandising, an interactive in-store and on-line entertainment experience and a best-in-retail-class customer service level – all designed to draw customers into stores and enhance long-term customer loyalty. As of February 3, 2007, the Company had over 650 f.y.e. stores and is in the process of re-branding the remaining of its freestanding stores to f.y.e. during 2007. The video only Suncoast brand will be retained. There were 118 Suncoast stores at February 3, 2007. During 2005, the Company ~~also~~ introduced its customer loyalty program, f.y.e. Backstage Pass, which is designed to ~~build stronger connections with each customer.~~drive repeat business.

Improving Merchandise Assortment and Product Mix

The Company ~~edits~~tailors the product mix of its stores toward regional tastes in order to ~~increase~~optimize the productivity of its stores, seeking to serve key customer segments within each store. This involves tailoring the overall ~~CD inventory and~~ square footage allocation in line with a store’s trend, and increasing inventory and square footage allocations for ~~other, growing~~growth categories. ~~The Company is also evaluating introduction of new products~~As music sales have continued to ~~complement its core categories of CD, DVD and video games. In particular,~~decline on an industry wide basis, the Company has been able to offset the impact by shifting square footage allocations from music to home video, video game, and other product categories. In addition, the acquisition of the video only Suncoast stores in March 2006 has helped diversify the product mix and lower music as a percentage of the total business. This is ~~seeing growth~~evident as music has decreased to 44.2% of total sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 53.6% in Fiscal 2005.

The acquisition of Mix and positive results with the introduction of new products including portable DVD players, mobile phones, MP3 players and accessories in the electronics, accessories and boutique categories and will continue to refine that mix. In 2005, an area of success was the 20% growth over 2004 in the Company’s used product business and this growth is expected to continueBurn in 2006 aswill allow the Company ~~expands into the underdeveloped DVD business as well as increase promotions~~to offer customers CD burning and ~~in-store merchandising.~~

~~The Company is embracing new digital media sales in its stores and on its e-commerce sites and regards~~ digital downloading ~~as a means to grow sales. With the introduction of its third generation Listening and Viewing Stations (“LVS 3”)~~stations in ~~all~~selected stores ~~in 2006, the Company will pursue growth in this category. LVS 3 will support the digital download of music and videos in the future.~~during 2007.

~~Growing~~ Store ~~Count~~Openings

The Company has historically grown its sales by opening new stores and by acquiring specialty retailers in its business. ~~The Company continues to assess and evaluate the expansion of its national store network, seeking prudent additions, as competitors abandon locations and where~~

economics are compelling. Management believes there are opportunities to expand into new markets, fill-in existing markets, and reposition stores in its current portfolio, particularly with its freestanding formats.

~~In October 2003,~~During 2006, the Company acquired ~~substantially all~~335 stores and closed 189 stores, including 125 of the ~~net assets of 111 stores from Wherehouse Entertainment Inc. (“Wherehouse”), a specialty music retailer located primarily in the Western United States, for $35.2 million in cash. The~~ acquired stores, ~~have been an excellent fit both strategically and operationally with the Company’s freestanding~~opened 64 stores and ~~provided an intelligent opportunity to expand its West Coast presence. The~~repositioned 15 stores. In 2007, the Company also acquired in October 2003 substantially all of the net assets of 13 specialty stores of CD World Inc. (“CD World”), located in New Jersey and Missouri, for $1.9 million in cash. See Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information.

will open very few new stores.

Historically, about 10% of the Company’s stores are ~~being~~ evaluated at any time for closure. The composition of these stores changes from time-to-time as the result of competitive changes and other factors. The Company ~~aggressively~~ closes stores when minimum operating thresholds are not achieved. In ~~recent years, the Company has experienced a net store decline, as closings have outnumbered openings and acquisitions.~~

During 2005, the Company closed 47 stores, opened 19 stores and repositioned 16 stores. Management believes it will close approximately 35 stores in 2006 and open about 50 new stores. The Company anticipates that its store growth will continue in the future. Subsequent to the fiscal year ended January 28, 2006 and effective March 27, 2006, the Company ~~acquired the~~experienced a significant net ~~assets of 335 stores from Musicland Holding Corp. (“Musicland”). Musicland, an entertainment specialty retailer which operates retail~~store increase, as acquired stores and websites under the names Sam Goody (SamGoody.com), Suncoast Motion Picture Company (Suncoast.com), On Cue and MediaPlay.com. The acquisition of the Musicland stores provides the Company with the ability to leverage theirnew store locations, and strategically increase its national presence and provide further growth opportunities. See Note 13 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for detail.openings outpaced store closings.

Key Performance Indicators

Management monitors a number of key performance indicators to evaluate its performance, including:

Sales:The Company measures the rate of comparable store sales change. A store is included in comparable store sales calculations at the beginning of its thirteenth full month of operation. Mall stores relocated in the same shopping center after being open for at least thirteen months are considered comparable stores. Closed stores that were open for at least thirteen months are included in comparable store sales through the month immediately preceding the month of closing. The Company further analyzes sales by store format ~~(i.e. mall versus freestanding)~~ and by product category.

Cost of Sales and Gross Profit: Gross profit is a function of the cost of product in relation to its retail selling value. Changes in gross profit are impacted primarily by sales levels, mix of products sold, vendor discounts and allowances and distribution costs. The Company records its distribution and product shrink expenses in cost of sales. Distribution expenses include those costs associated with purchasing, receiving, inspecting and warehousing merchandise and costs associated with product returns to vendors. Cost of sales also includes obsolescence costs and is reduced by the benefit of vendor allowances.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) ~~Expenses:~~expenses: Included in SG&A expenses are payroll and related costs, occupancy charges, professional and service fees, general operating and overhead expenses and depreciation charges (excluding those related to distribution operations, as discussed in Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). SG&A expenses also include asset impairment charges and write-offs, if any, and miscellaneous items, other than interest.

Balance Sheet and Ratios:The Company views cash, net inventory investment ~~(inventory~~(merchandise inventory less accounts payable) and working capital (current assets less current liabilities) as indicators of its financial position. See Liquidity and Capital Resources for further discussion of these items.

Fiscal Year Ended February 3, 2007 (“2006”)

Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 28, 2006 (“2005”)

~~Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005 (“2004”)~~Sales.

~~Sales.~~ The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s total sales:


					2006 vs. 2005

($ in thousands)	2006		2005		$		%

Sales	$	1,471,157	$	1,238,486	$	232,671		18.8	%

Sales increased in 2006 due to an increase in the average store count. Due to the Musicland acquisition, average store count increased from 801 in Fiscal 2005 to 1,044 in Fiscal 2006. Additionally, the 53^rd week in Fiscal 2006 contributed approximately $23.0 million in sales. These factors were partially offset by a comparable store sales decrease of 6.2%. Non-comparable store sales for Fiscal 2006 and 2005 were $349.5 million and $37.6 million, respectively. Total product units sold in Fiscal 2006 increased 13.4% over Fiscal 2005, and the average retail price for units sold increased 3.8% as a larger portion of the Company’s total units sold represented DVDs, video games and electronics which, in general, sell at higher average retail unit prices than CDs.

2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)

2005

2004

$

%

Sales

$
1,238,486

$
1,365,133

$
(126,647
)
(9.3
)%

Sales and percentage of total by merchandise category for Fiscal 2006 and 2005, sales change by category for Fiscal 2006 and comparable store sales by category for Fiscal 2006 were as follows:



($ in thousands)	2006 Sales		% Total			2005 Sales		% Total			Total % Sales Change			Comparable Store % Sales Change


Music	$	650,352		44.2	%	$	663,712		53.6	%		(2.0	)%		(14.0	)%
Home Video		552,722		37.6			371,965		30.0			48.6			1.2
Video games		114,514		7.8			90,408		7.3			26.7			4.0
Other		153,569		10.4			112,401		9.1			36.6			7.9

Total	$	1,471,157		100.0	%	$	1,238,486		100.0	%		18.8	%		(6.2	)%

The “Other” category includes electronics, accessories and trend item sales, none of which individually exceed 5% of total sales.

Music

The Company’s stores offer a wide range of new and used CDs across most music genres, including new releases from current artists as well as an extensive catalog of music from past periods and artists. The music category represented 44.2% of the Company’s sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 53.6% in Fiscal 2005. The music category has declined as a percentage of total sales due to a shift in square footage allocations to higher growth categories and due to the acquisition of over 160 video only Suncoast stores in March 2006 (118 remain open at February 3, 2007) which has shifted a larger portion of total sales into the home video category.

Total sales in the music category declined 2.0% from $663.7 million in Fiscal 2005 to $650.4 million in Fiscal 2006. The Company’s annual CD unit sales decreased 2.7% in Fiscal 2006. This decrease in total music sales is due to lower comparable store sales, partially offset by increased average store count.

On a comparable store basis, music sales declined 14.0% due to continued industry sales declines and the aforementioned shift in store square footage allocations. According to Soundscan, total CD unit sales in the United States declined 6.2% during the period corresponding with the Company’s Fiscal 2006.

Home Video

The Company offers DVDs in all its stores. The home video category represented 37.6% of the Company’s sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 30.0% in Fiscal 2005. The majority of the increase is due to the addition of the video only Suncoast stores in March 2006. The increase is also partially due to the increase in store square footage to support the home video category.

Total sales for Fiscal 2006 in the home video category, including DVD and VHS, increased 48.6% from $372.0 million in Fiscal 2005 to $552.7 million in Fiscal 2006. Total sales in the DVD category increased 55.5% in 2006 and represented 99.1% of total home video sales in 2006. The total sales increase in home video is due the addition of the Suncoast stores, a greater average store count and an increase in comparable store sales.

Comparable store sales, during Fiscal 2006, increased 5.5% in the DVD category. Comparable store sales in the total home video category, including VHS, increased only 1.2% due to the declining VHS category as the Company has discontinued carrying VHS during Fiscal 2006.

The increase in DVD comparable store sales reflects the increase in inventory and floor space to support growth in this category. According to statistics obtained from Rentrak Home Video Essentials, overall home video sales in calendar year 2006, including DVD and VHS, were $15.9 billion, a decrease of 0.9% from 2005. DVD retail sales in calendar year 2006 were $15.7 billion, flat compared to 2005.

Video games

The Company offers video game hardware and software in most of its stores. Total sales in the video game category increased 26.7% from $90.4 million in Fiscal 2005 to $114.5 million in Fiscal 2006 and represented 7.8% of the Company’s total sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 7.3% in Fiscal 2005.

Comparable store sales in the video games category increased 4.0% in 2006. The increase was due to the release of Sony’s Play Station 3 and Nintendo’s Wii in November 2006 and Microsoft’s Xbox 360 which was released in November 2005. According to the NPD Group, video games sales during calendar year 2006, including portable and console hardware, software and accessories increased 19% over calendar year 2005 sales.

Other

The “Other” category consists of electronics, accessories and trend items and represented 10.4% of total sales in Fiscal 2006 compared to 9.1% in Fiscal 2005. Total sales in this category increased 36.6% to $153.6 million in Fiscal 2006 compared to $112.4 million in Fiscal 2005. This increase is due to the increase in average store count and a comparable store sale increase of 7.9%.

Gross Profit. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s Gross Profit:


							2006 vs. 2005

($ in thousands)	2006			2005			$		%

Gross Profit	$	519,222		$	431,613		$	87,609		20.3	%

As a percentage of sales		35.3	%		34.9	%

Gross profit as a percentage of sales increased 40 basis points in Fiscal 2006 as compared to Fiscal 2005 due to higher overall product margins (20 basis points) and the leveraging of distribution expenses over the total sales increase (20 basis points).

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s SG&A expenses:


							2006 vs. 2005

($ in thousands)	2006			2005			$		%

Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	519,246		$	426,854		$	92,392		21.6	%

As a percentage of sales		35.3	%		34.5	%

The Company’s SG&A expenses increased in Fiscal 2006 due to the operation of a greater number of stores. The Company operated an average of 1,044 stores in 2006 compared to an average of 801 stores in 2005, an increase of 30%. SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales increased 80 basis points, due to the recording of $7.9 million in transition costs related to the Musicland acquisition and a comparable store sales decrease of 6.2%.

Interest Expense. Interest expense in Fiscal 2006 was $5.5 million compared to $3.0 million in Fiscal 2005. The increase is due to increased borrowings on the Company’s line of credit to fund the Musicland acquisition, along with higher variable interest rates.

Other Income. For Fiscal 2006, other income includes a $3.5 million gain on the sale of an investment. For Fiscal 2005, other income includes a realized gain of $0.8 million on the sale of available-for-sale securities. Other income also includes interest income, which was $0.9 million and $1.4 million in Fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s income tax (benefit) expense:


							2006 vs. 2005

($ in thousands)	2006			2005			$


Income tax expense (benefit)	$	(2,041	)	$	1,090		$	(3,131	)

Effective tax rate		186.7	%		27.4	%

The 2006 income tax benefit is attributable to a tax favored gain from the sale of an investment, which resulted in a $1.4 million reduction of the valuation allowance attributable to losses on investments, favorable settlements of income tax examinations ($0.9 million) and federal income tax credits ($0.3 million), partially offset by unfavorable state tax legislation enacted during the year and changes in management’s estimates of the realization of state net operating losses. For a reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate, see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

For Fiscal 2005, the Company’s effective tax rate was negatively impacted by changes in Ohio State tax legislation. The legislation phased out state corporation franchise taxes which are based on income. The impact of the Ohio tax legislation resulted in an increase in the state valuation allowance of $1.9 million, associated with deferred tax assets, principally net operating losses that, based on management’s estimates, will not be realized during the phase-out period. Additionally, the valuation allowance was increased by $0.9 million to reserve for deferred tax assets attributable to state net operating losses impacted as a result of projected lower future taxable income within certain states’ expiration periods. During Fiscal 2005, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $2.0 million attributable to the effect of additional deductible temporary differences.

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle. The Company adopted FIN 47,Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, effective January 28, 2006. In accordance with FIN 47, the Company recorded an asset and a corresponding liability for the present value of the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at its store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases. The Company recognized an expense for the cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2005 of $2.3 million, net of income taxes of $1.5 million.

Extraordinary Gain. In Fiscal 2006, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain as a result of acquiring substantially all of the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. on March 27, 2006. From March 27, 2006 to February 3, 2007, the Company allocated the purchase price in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations, resulting in an extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill of $10.7 million, net of income taxes $6.7 million. The extraordinary gain represents the excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price. The purchase price was allocated on a preliminary basis during the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2006 using information available at the time. The extraordinary gain recorded as of April 29, 2006 was $0.9 million, which was net of income taxes of $0.7 million. In accordance with SFAS No.141, the allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities acquired must be finalized within twelve months following the date of acquisition. Accordingly, the purchase price allocation has been adjusted between April 29, 2006 and February 3, 2007, resulting in an adjustment to the extraordinary gain of $9.8 million, which is net of income taxes of $6.0 million. The pre-tax increase in the extraordinary gain from April 29, 2006 to February 3, 2007 represents adjustments to the value of acquired inventory ($1.9 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to the former Musicland loyalty program ($3.4 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to gift cards based on the redemption experience since acquisition ($6.1 million) and an adjustment to occupancy related expenses ($1.5 million) and an adjustment to the cash purchase price ($2.9 million).

Net Income. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s net income:


							2006 vs. 2005

($ in thousands)	2006			2005			$			%

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	948		$	2,886		$	(1,938	)		(67.2	%)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes of $6,739 and $0 for 2006 and 2005, respectively		10,721			—

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes of $0 and $1,505 for 2006 and 2005, respectively		—			(2,277	)

Net income	$	11,669		$	609		$	11,060			1,816.1	%


Net income as a percentage of sales		0.8	%		0.1	%

Income before extraordinary items decreased to $0.9 million in Fiscal 2006 as increased sales and gross profit associated with the increased average store count was not enough to offset a 6.2% decline in comparable store sales and the increase in SG&A expenses, including integration expenses of $7.9 million related to the Musicland acquisition. Income before extraordinary items in Fiscal 2006 was positively impacted by an income tax benefit of $2.0 million. The increase in net income in Fiscal 2006 is due to the extraordinary gain, net of tax, of $10.7 million recorded in relation to the Musicland acquisition.

Fiscal Year Ended January 28, 2006 (“2005”)
Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005 (“2004”)

Sales. The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s total Sales:


					2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)	2005		2004		$			%

Sales	$	1,238,486	$	1,365,133	$	(126,647	)		(9.3)%

Sales decreased in 2005 due to a decrease in the average store count from ~~810 at the end of~~853 during 2004 to ~~782 at the end of~~801 during 2005. The decrease in sales was also the result of a comparable store sales decrease of 5.7%. In 2005, comparable store sales decreased 5.4% for mall-based stores and decreased 6.3% for freestanding stores. A store is included in comparable store sales calculations at the beginning of its thirteenth full month of operation. Not including comparable store sales, sales from new and acquired stores, sales from stores closed during the year and Internet sales, for 2005 and 2004 were $37.6 million and $145.8 million, respectively. Product units sold in 2005 decreased 9.0% over 2004, and average retail for units sold decreased 0.5%.

Sales by merchandise category for 2005 and 2004 and comparable store sales by category for 2005 were as follows:

Total Comparable

2005

2004

Store Sales

($ in thousands)

Music:

Compact discs

$
655,806

$
736,149

(8.5
)%
Audio cassettes and singles

7,906

14,463

(42.5
)
Total Music

663,712

750,612

(9.2
)
Video:

DVD

352,184

360,262

0.7

VHS

19,781

37,781

(45.5
)
Total Video

371,965

398,043

(3.7
)
Video games

90,408

89,297

2.3

Other

112,401

127,181

4.4

Total

$
1,238,486

$
1,365,133

(5.7
)%



($ in thousands)	2005		% Total			2004		% Total			Total % Sales Change			Comparable Store % Sales Change


Music	$	663,712		53.6	%	$	750,612		55.0	%		(11.6	) %		(9.2	)%
Home Video		371,965		30.0			398,043		29.2			(6.6	)		(3.7	)
Video games		90,408		7.3			89,297		6.5			1.2			2.3
Other		112,401		9.1			127,181		9.3			(11.6	)		4.4

Total	$	1,238,486		100.0	%	$	1,365,133		100.0	%		(9.3	) %		(5.7	)%

The “Other” category includes electronics, accessories ~~boutique~~ and ~~other sales,~~trend items, none of which individually exceeds 5%. of total sales.

Music

The Company’s annual CD unit sales decreased 12.4% in 2005. This decrease is due to a lower store count, weak industry new releases and increased digital downloading. According to Soundscan, total CD unit sales in the United States declined 7.2%. during the same period.

Home Video

The Company is working to introduce digital distribution channels in its stores and through its e-commerce sites. The Company has rolled-out the third generation of LVS, or LVS 3, in over 185 mall stores at the end of 2005 and expects to install it in all stores in 2006. This next generation of technology for the customers enhances overall in-store and online experience through new product information displays and full catalog search capabilities. It is also positioned to deliver in-store digital downloading in the future. Management believes that music will be the category with the highest sales for the foreseeable future.

~~Video~~

~~The Company offers DVDs in all its stores.~~ Total sales for 2005 in the home video category decreased 6.6%. Total sales in the DVD category decreased 2.2% in 2005, ~~due to a lower store count,~~and were partially offset by a comparable store sales increase of 0.7%. The increase in DVD comparable store sales ~~reflects~~reflected the continued industry growth in this category offset by a lack of strong new releases and increased competition. The ~~Company plans to continue to grow market share in this category by adding more product and increasing square footage allocations. The~~home video category, including DVD and VHS, represented 30.0% of the Company’s total sales in 2005. According to statistics obtained from Rentrak Home Video Essentials, DVD industry retail sales in 2005 were $15.7 billion, an increase of 4.5% over 2004.

Video games

~~The Company offers video game hardware and software in most of its stores, with a mix that favors software.~~ Comparable sales in the video games category increased 2.3% in 2005. The results in this category were positively impacted by Microsoft’s Xbox 360 which was released in

November 2005. The comparable store sales increase in this category was partially offset by hardware shortages, delays in ~~release~~releases of highly anticipated software titles and consumer anticipation of next-generation hardware. Video games represented 7.3% of the Company’s total sales in 2005. According to the NPD Group, industry sales for 2005 were $10.5 billion including portable and console hardware, software and accessories, an increase of 6% over 2004.

Other

The “Other” category predominantly consists of electronics, accessories and trend items and represented 9.1% of total sales in Fiscal 2005 compared to 9.3% in Fiscal 2004. Total sales in these categories decreased 11.6% to $112.4 million in Fiscal 2005 compared to $127.2 million in Fiscal 2004. This decrease is due to the decrease in average store count, partially offset by a comparable store sale increase of 4.4%.

Gross Profit.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s Gross Profit:

2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)

2005

2004

$

%

Gross Profit

$
431,613

$
495,134

$
(63,521
)
(12.8
)%

As a percentage of sales

34.9
%
36.3
%


							2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)	2005			2004			$			%

Gross Profit	$	431,613		$	495,134		$	(63,521	)		(12.8) %

As a percentage of sales		34.9	%		36.3	%

Gross profit as a percentage of sales decreased in 2005 as compared to 2004 due to an increase in the Company’s distribution center costs by 30 basis points, a shift in the mix of sales from music to DVD and video games categories of 30 basis points and more competitive pricing in DVD, video games and accessories categories of 50 basis points.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s SG&A expenses:

2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)

2005

2004

$

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

$
426, 854

$
450,162

$
(23,308
)
(5.2
)%

As a percentage of sales

34.5
%
33.0
%


							2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)	2005			2004			$			%

Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	426,854		$	450,162		$	(23,308	)		(5.2) %

As a percentage of sales		34.5	%		33.0	%

The Company’s SG&A expenses decreased in 2005 due to the operation of fewer stores. The Company operated an average of ~~796~~801 stores in 2005 compared to an average of ~~846~~853 stores in 2004, a decrease of 6%. The increase in the SG&A expenses rate as a percentage of sales was due to lower sales.

Interest Expense. Interest expense was $3.0 million during 2005 compared to $2.4 million during 2004. The increase was due to a full year of interest being recorded on the real estate mortgaged in 2004 (See Footnote 4 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and interest expense recorded on the $12.0 million capital lease financing of the Company’s point of sale system in 2005 (See Footnote 8 in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements).

Other Income.Other income includes interest ~~income.~~income of $1.4 million. For 2005, other income also ~~includes~~included a realized gain of $0.8 million on the sale of available-for-sale securities.

Income Tax Expense.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s provision for income taxes:

2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)

2005

2004

$

Income tax expense

$
1,090

$
4,892

$
(3,802
)

Effective tax rate

27.4
%
11.2
%


							2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)	2005			2004			$


Income tax expense	$	1,090		$	4,892		$ (3,802)

Effective tax rate		27.4	%		11.2	%

For 2005, the Company’s effective tax rate was negatively impacted by changes in Ohio State tax legislation. The legislation ~~phases~~phased out state corporation franchise taxes which are based on income. The impact of the Ohio tax legislation resulted in an increase in the state valuation allowance of $1.9 million, associated with deferred tax assets, principally net operating losses that, based on management’s estimates, will not be realized during the phase-out period. Additionally, the valuation allowance was increased by $0.9 million to reserve for deferred tax assets attributable to state net operating losses impacted as a result of projected lower future taxable income within certain states’ expiration periods. During 2005, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $2.0 million attributable to the effect of additional deductible temporary differences. For a reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate, see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The effective tax rate for 2004 was positively impacted by a benefit arising from the closing of a federal income tax examination and a decrease in the valuation allowance. The benefit of $10.5 million was recorded in the second fiscal quarter and included the closing of all matters not previously settled in relation to corporate-owned life insurance (“COLI”) policies, which were part of the Company’s acquisition of Camelot in ~~1999 (see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).~~1999. The original income tax payable amounts which were recorded during the years covered by the examination were reversed subsequent to the final settlement resulting in the tax benefit. With the closing of the tax examination, the Company has surrendered the remaining COLI policies. In addition, the valuation allowance was decreased by $2.2 million to account for the planned utilization of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards during the

expiration periods previously considered ~~uncertain (see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).~~uncertain.

Cumulative Effect of a Change in Accounting Principle.The Company adopted FIN 47,Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, effective January 28, 2006. In accordance with FIN 47, the Company recorded an asset and a corresponding liability for the present value of the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at its store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases. The Company recognized an expense for the cumulative effect of this change in accounting principle in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2005 of $2.3 million, net of income taxes of $1.5 million.

Extraordinary Gain.In Fiscal 2004, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain as the result of acquiring substantially all the net assets of Wherehouse Entertainment Inc. and CD World Inc. in October 2003 for $35.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The purchase price was allocated on a preliminary basis using information available at the time. The gain represents the excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price. In accordance with SFAS No.141,Business Combinations, the allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities acquired was finalized and adjusted in 2004, resulting in an extraordinary gain of $3.2 million, which is net of income taxes of $2.0 million, related to unallocated negative goodwill. The extraordinary gain represents adjustments to the value of liquidated inventory ($2.5 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to gift cards based on the redemption experience since acquisition ($2.1 million) and occupancy related expenses ($0.6 million).

Net Income.The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s net income:

2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)

2005

2004

$

%

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

$
2,886

$
38,675

$
(35,789
)
(92.5
)%
Extraordinary gain –unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes of $0 and $1,979 for 2005 and 2004, respectively

—

3,166

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes of $1,505 and $0 for 2005 and 2004 , respectively

(2,277
)
—

Net income

$
609

$
41,841

$
(41,232
)

Net income as a percentage of sales

0.1
%
3.1
%


							2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)	2005			2004			$			%

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	2,886		$	38,675		$	(35,789	)		(92.5)%
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes of $0 and $1,979 for 2005 and 2004, respectively		—			3,166

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes of $1,505 and $0 for 2005 and 2004, respectively		(2,277	)		—


Net income	$	609		$	41,841		$	(41,232	)


Net income as a percentage of sales		0.1	%		3.1	%

The decrease in income before extraordinary gain and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, and net income in 2005 as compared to 2004 is due to the decrease in income from operations driven by lower sales and resulting lower gross profit, partially offset by lower SG&A expenses, and a lower income tax benefit of $2.0 million recorded in 2005 compared to a benefit of $10.5 million, which was recorded in the second fiscal quarter of ~~2004 (see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).~~

172004.

~~Fiscal Year Ended January 29, 2005 (“2004”)~~

~~Compared to Fiscal Year Ended January 31, 2004 (“2003”)~~

~~Sales.~~ ~~The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s total Sales:~~

2004 vs. 2003

($ in thousands)

2004

2003

$

%

Sales

$
1,365,133

$
1,330,626

$
34,507

2.6
%

Sales increased in 2004 despite a decrease in the store count from 881 at the end of 2003 to 810 at the end of 2004. The increase in sales resulted from a comparable store sales increase of 0.8%. In 2004, comparable store sales increased 1.9% for mall-based stores and decreased 1.3% for freestanding stores. A store is included in comparable store sales calculations at the beginning of its thirteenth full month of operation. Sales from new and acquired stores and stores closed during the year, excluded from comparable store sales, for 2004 and 2003 are $145.8 million and $121.2 million, respectively. Product units sold in 2004 increased 3.4% over 2003, and average retail for units sold decreased 0.6%.

~~Sales by merchandise category and comparable store sales for 2004 and 2003 were as follows:~~

2004

2003

Comparable
Store Sales

($ in thousands)

Music:

Compact discs

$
736,149

$
717,145

(0.8
)%
Audio cassettes and singles

14,463

23,819

(38.4
)
Total Music

750,612

740,964

(2.0
)
Video:

DVD

360,262

313,977

14.6

VHS

37,781

60,891

(35.3
)
Total Video

398,043

374,868

6.5

Video games

89,297

80,888

9.6

Other

127,181

133,906

(5.8
)
Total

$
1,365,133

$
1,330,626

0.8
%

~~The “Other” category includes electronics, accessories, boutique and other sales, none of which individually exceeds 5%.~~

~~Music~~

The Company’s stores offer a wide range of CDs across most music genres, including new releases from current artists as well as an extensive catalog of music from past periods and artists. This category represented 55% of the Company’s sales in 2004.

The Company’s annual CD unit sales increased 4.0% in 2004. Despite positive comparable store sales during the first and second quarters of 2004, annual comparable store sales in the CD category declined in 2004. The decrease is largely due to weak industry new releases and effects of the much publicized unauthorized duplication of music. The Company’s annual CD unit sales compared favorably with the Soundscan reported industry increase of 1.9% in 2004. The industry increase marked the first rise in four years. Despite the growing popularity of legal digital music downloads, the CD format accounts for 98% of the 666 million albums sold, according to Soundscan.

The Company is actively embracing digital media in its stores and through its e-commerce activities and regards digital downloading as yet another format for selling media products. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company unveiled the f.y.e Download Zone, a subscription-based digital music service, where customers can have access to over a million songs for a monthly fee of $14.95.

~~Video~~

The Company offers DVDs and VHS in all of its stores. The growth in the DVD format has more than offset the corresponding decline in VHS for the Company. The increase in the Company’s comparable store sales for video was driven by DVD comparable store sales which increased 14.6%. The Company plans to continue to grow its business and market share in this category by adding more product and increasing square footage allocations. The video category, including DVD and VHS, represented 29% of the Company’s total sales in 2004.

According to statistics obtained from Rentrak Home Video Essentials, video sales, including DVD and VHS, increased 15% to $16.1 billion in 2004, as compared to 2003. The increase in 2004 was driven by a 27% increase in DVD sales. VHS sales declined by 57% during the same period.

~~Video games~~

The Company offers game hardware and software in most of its stores, with a mix that favors software. The Company’s video games business improved steadily during the second half of 2004, reversing first half results. The Company’s comparable sales in this category increased 9.6% in 2004. The results in the video games category were driven by the Company’s initiatives to improve product selection and increase the category’s visibility in its stores. The video games category was also positively impacted by the success of new releases, including Grand Theft Auto – San Andreas and Halo2. The category represented 7% of the Company’s total sales in 2004.

Software sales for the game industry were $6.2 billion, up 8%, or $400 million over sales in 2003. Industry sales for 2004 of $9.9 billion including portable and console hardware, software and accessories, decreased by less than 1% over 2003 sales, according to The NPD Group, which tracks video games sales in the United States. For 2004, console software, portable game software and portable game hardware also experienced unit sales increases of 8%, 13% and 9%, respectively.

~~Gross Profit.~~ ~~The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s Gross Profit:~~

2004 vs. 2003

($ in thousands)

2004

2003

$

%

Gross Profit

$
495,134

$
487,900

$
7,234

1.5
%

As a percentage of sales

36.3
%
36.7
%

The decrease in the gross profit rate as a percentage of sales was due to a continued shift in the mix of the Company’s sales toward DVD and video games, and higher markdowns in the electronics, accessories and boutique categories due to fourth quarter promotions and clearance activity. The Company also incurred higher product shrink expenses and distribution costs associated with bringing its Carson, California distribution facility into full production during the year.

~~Selling, General and Administrative Expenses.~~ ~~The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s SG&A expenses:~~

2004 vs. 2003

($ in thousands)

2004

2003

$

%

Selling, general and administrative expenses

$
450,162

$
459,441

$
(9,279
)
(2.0
)%

As a percentage of sales

33.0
%
34.5
%

The Company’s SG&A expenses were lower in 2004 due to the absence of non-recurring charges including the write-off of long-lived assets of $3.7 million related to the outsourcing of its Internet operations, and transition costs of $2.3 million associated with the Wherehouse acquisition in 2003. The Company also recognized approximately $5.0 million lower incentive bonuses in 2004 as compared to 2003. The improvement in the SG&A expenses rate as a percentage of sales was also due to the increase in 2004 sales.

~~Income Tax Expense.~~ ~~The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s provision for income taxes:~~

2004 vs. 2003

($ in thousands)

2004

2003

$

Income tax expense

$
4,892

$
8,302

$
(3,410
)

Effective tax rate

11.2
%
30.7
%

For 2004, the Company’s effective tax rate of 11.2% was positively impacted by a benefit arising from the closing of a federal income tax examination and a decrease in the valuation allowance. The benefit of $10.5 million was recorded in the second fiscal quarter and included the closing of all matters not previously settled in relation to corporate-owned life insurance (“COLI”) policies, which were part of the Company’s acquisition of Camelot in 1999 (see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). The original income tax payable amounts which were recorded during the years covered by the examination were reversed subsequent to the final settlement resulting in the tax benefit. With the closing of the tax examination, the Company has surrendered the remaining COLI policies. In addition, the valuation allowance was decreased by $2.2 million to account for the planned utilization of federal and state net operating loss carryforwards during the expiration periods previously considered uncertain.

For 2003, the Company’s effective tax rate of 30.7% was positively impacted by improved earnings before taxes and the settlement of its COLI litigation with the IRS. An increase in earnings improves the rate due to the rate leverage on fixed-base state taxes recorded in income tax

expense. The Company recorded an additional tax benefit of $2.1 million as a result of the COLI settlement payment terms with the IRS that it recorded in the second quarter (see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). For a reconciliation of the federal statutory tax rate to the Company’s effective income tax rate, see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~Extraordinary Gain.~~ In 2004, the Company recorded an extraordinary gain as the result of acquiring substantially all the net assets of Wherehouse Entertainment Inc. and CD World Inc. in October 2003 for $35.2 million and $1.9 million, respectively. The purchase price was allocated on a preliminary basis using information available at the time. The gain represents the excess of the fair value of net assets acquired over the purchase price. In accordance with SFAS No.141, ~~Business Combinations~~, the allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities acquired was finalized and adjusted in 2004, resulting in an extraordinary gain of $3.2 million, which is net of income taxes of $2.0 million, related to unallocated negative goodwill. The extraordinary gain represents adjustments to the value of liquidated inventory ($2.5 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to gift cards based on the redemption experience since acquisition ($2.1 million) and occupancy related expenses ($0.6 million).

~~Net Income.~~ ~~The following table sets forth a year-over-year comparison of the Company’s net income:~~

2004 vs. 2003

($ in thousands)

2004

2003

$

%

Income before extraordinary gain

$
38,675

$
18,728

$
19,947

106.5
%
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes of $1,979 and $2,437 for 2004 and 2003, respectively

3,166

4,339

Net income

$
41,841

$
23,067

$
18,774

81.4
%

��

Net income as a percentage of sales

3.1
%
1.7
%

The increase in income before extraordinary gain and net income in 2004 as compared to 2003 is due to increased sales and resulting gross profit, lower SG&A expenses and the income tax benefit recorded in the second fiscal quarter of 2004 (see Note 6 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Liquidity and Cash Flows: The Company’s primary sources of working capital are cash provided by operations and borrowing capacity under its revolving credit facility. The Company’s cash flows fluctuate from quarter to quarter due to various items, including seasonality of sales and earnings, merchandise inventory purchases and the related terms on the purchases, store openings, tax payments and capital ~~expenditures and stock repurchase activity.~~expenditures. Management believes it will have adequate resources to fund its cash needs for the foreseeable future, and anticipates that cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund its capital spending, its seasonal increase in merchandise inventory, income tax payments and other operating cash requirements and commitments. Management anticipates any cash requirements due to an unanticipated shortfall in cash from operations, ~~will~~would be funded by the Company’s revolving credit facility, discussed hereafter. Management believes its reported cash flows for Fiscal 2006 are indicative of cash flow for Fiscal 2007, with the ~~foreseeable future~~exception of cash usage associated with the acquisition of Musicland, and is not currently aware of any trends, uncertainties or other significant events that would cause liquidity to increase or decrease in a material ~~way except as discussed under Subsequent Events - Note 13 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.~~way. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will continue to generate cash flows at or above current levels or that we will be able to maintain the Company’s ability to borrow under the revolving credit facility. The Company does not expect any material changes in the mix (between equity and debt) or the relative cost of capital resources.

The following table sets forth a three year summary of key components of cash flow and working capital:


							2006 vs. 2005									2005 vs. 2004

($ in thousands)	2006			2005			$			%			2004			$			%

Operating Cash Flows	$	47,268		$	25,247		$	22,021			87	%	$	105,931		$	(80,684	)	(76	)%
Investing Cash Flows		(122,871	)		(40,517	)		(82,354	)		(203	)%		(35,398	)		(5,119	)	(14	)%
Financing Cash Flows		(2,976	)		(17,289	)		14,313			83	%		(32,687	)		15,398		47	%

Capital Expenditures		(48,289	)		(41,330	)		(6,959	)		(17	)%		(33,398	)		(7,932	)	(24	)%
Acquisition of Business		(78,810	)		—			(78,810	)		—			(2,000	)		2,000		—

Cash and Cash Equivalents		118,630			197,209			(78,579	)		(40	)%		229,768			(32,559	)	(14	)%
Merchandise Inventory		504,860			402,712			102,148			25	%		431,246			(28,534	)	(7	)%
Working Capital		266,204			273,623			(7,419	)		(3	)%		289,999			(16,376	)	(6	)%
Inventory turns		1.8			1.9									2.0

Cash from operating activities increased by approximately $22.0 million in Fiscal 2006. The most significant factor driving the increase was the decrease (cash source) in net merchandise inventory (merchandise inventory less accounts payable) as compared to Fiscal 2005, excluding the merchandise inventory acquired in the Musicland acquisition. The change in net inventory provided cash of approximately $14.3 million in Fiscal 2006, compared to a cash use of approximately $10.2 million in Fiscal 2005, resulting in a $24.5 million increase in cash from operating activities. This was partially offset by a decrease in income before depreciation, amortization, stock compensation and gains and losses for which proceeds are presented in investing activities of approximately $2.6 million. Additional cash uses of approximately $2.9 million for accrued expenses and changes in prepaid expenses and other assets resulting in decreases in cash from operating activities of approximately $2.0 million, as compared to Fiscal 2005, were offset by changes in accounts receivable resulting in an increase in cash from operating activities of approximately $3.3 million and changes in current and deferred taxes resulting an increase in cash from operating activities of approximately $1.5 million.

2005 vs. 2004

2004 vs. 2003

($ in thousands)

2005

2004

$

%

2003

$

%

Operating Cash Flows

$
25,247

$
105,931

$
(80,684
)
(76
)%
$
66,883

$
39,048

58
%
Investing Cash Flows

(40,517
)
(35,398
)
(5,119
)
(14
)%
(54,033
)
18,635

34
%
Financing Cash Flows

(17,289
)
(32,687
)
15,398

47
%
(17,978
)
(14,709
)
(82
)%

Capital Expenditures

(41,330
)
(33,398
)
(7,932
)
(24
)%
(16,989
)
(16,409
)
97
%

Cash and Cash Equivalents

197,209

229,768

(32,559
)
(14
)%
191,922

37,846

20
%
Merchandise Inventory

402,712

431,246

(28,534
)
(7
)%
424,783

6,463

2
%
Working Capital

257,467

278,066

(20,599
)
(7
)%
253,475

24,591

10
%
Inventory turns

1.9

2.0

2.1

The Company monitors various statistics to measure its management of inventory, including inventory turn (annual cost of sales divided by average merchandise inventory balances), inventory investment per square foot and inventory leverage (accounts payable divided by merchandise inventory). Inventory turn in Fiscal 2006 was 1.8 compared to 1.9 in Fiscal 2005. Inventory investment per square foot was $85 per square foot at the end of Fiscal 2006 as compared to $83 per square foot at the end of Fiscal 2005. Inventory leverage was 62% as of February 3, 2007 compared with 76% as of January 28, 2006. Management considers these results to be in a normal operating range. Management does not anticipate large fluctuations in merchandise inventory or accounts payable balances in the foreseeable future.

Cash used in investing activities was $122.9 million in Fiscal 2006, as compared to $40.5 million in Fiscal 2005. In Fiscal 2006, the primary uses of cash in investing activities were $48.3 million for capital expenditures and $78.8 million for the acquisition of the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. These uses were partially offset by proceeds from the sale of an investment of approximately $4.2 million. The Company had capital expenditures in 2006 of $16.7 million for new store openings, relocations and store improvements. An additional $5.3 million was invested in the expansion of LVS 3 (Listening and Viewing Stations) to a greater number of stores. Another $13.5 million was invested in general MIS software and equipment. An investment of $8.4 million was made in store visual displays and other store related projects. Other capital expenditures totaled $4.4 million.

Capital expenditures were $41.3 million in Fiscal 2005. Included in Fiscal 2005 capital expenditures was $16.0 million for new store openings, relocations and other store improvements. The Company further made investments in its store technology and upgraded its LVS (in-store Listening and Viewing Stations) for $10.7 million. The Company also replaced its store point-of-sale system for $12.0 million.

The Company typically finances its capital expenditures through cash generated from operations. It may also receive landlord allowances or concessions for store openings, relocations or improvements. The Company anticipates capital spending of approximately $35 million in 2007.

In March, 2006, the Company acquired 335 Musicland stores for a total cash consideration of $78.8 million, and $16.3 million in assumed liabilities including certain customer obligations, rent and occupancy liabilities and other employee obligations. See Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Cash used in financing activities was $3.0 million in Fiscal 2006, as compared to a $17.3 million use of cash in Fiscal 2005. In Fiscal 2006, the primary uses of cash were payments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations of $0.5 million and $3.2 million, respectively, partially offset by $0.7 million in proceeds and excess tax benefits received from the exercise of stock awards. In Fiscal 2005, the primary use of cash in financing activities was $31.3 million to repurchase outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock under programs authorized by the Board of Directors. There are currently no open share repurchase programs.

The decrease in cash from operating activities in Fiscal 2005 compared to Fiscal 2004 was the result of lower net income of $0.6 million as compared to net income of $41.8 million in 2004. It was further due to a ~~net $7.0~~$10.2 million cash use in Fiscal 2005 in net merchandise inventory ~~(inventory~~(merchandise inventory less accounts payable) as compared to a ~~$48.1~~$44.1 million ~~net~~ cash source in Fiscal 2004. ~~The net $7.0 million cash use in 2005 was the result of larger than usual inventory payments in early 2005 for inventory received in the fourth quarter of 2004.~~

The Company used less cash in Fiscal 2005 for the payment of accrued expenses ($2.8 million cash use in Fiscal 2005 as compared to $10.4 million cash use in Fiscal 2004) and taxes ($7.9 million cash use in Fiscal 2005 as compared to $15.1 million cash use in Fiscal 2004). compared to Fiscal 2004. All other operating cash sources in Fiscal 2005, net, were approximately $10.7 million.

The Company monitors various statistics to measure its management of inventory, including inventory turn (annual cost of sales divided by average inventory balances), inventory investment per square foot and inventory leverage (accounts payable divided by inventory). Inventory turn for 2005 was 1.9 compared to 2.0 in 2004. Inventory investment per square foot was $83 per square foot at the end of 2005 as compared to $86 per square foot at the end of 2004. Inventory leverage was 80% as of January 28, 2006 compared with 83% as of January 29, 2005. Management considers these results to be in a normal operating range. Management does not anticipate large fluctuations in inventory or accounts payable balances for its existing stores in the foreseeable future.

Cash used in investing activities was $40.5 million in Fiscal 2005, as compared to $35.4 million in Fiscal 2004. In Fiscal 2005, the primary use of cash used in investing activities was $41.3 million for capital expenditures. The Company had capital expenditures in Fiscal 2005 of $16.0 million for new store openings and relocations and for store improvements. The Company further made investments in its store technology and upgraded its LVS (in-store Listening and Viewing Stations) for $10.7 million. The Company also replaced its store point-of-sale system for $12.0 ~~million, as discussed hereafter.~~

The Company had capital expenditures in 2004 of $24.5 million for new store openings and relocations and for store improvements. The Company further made investments in its store technology and upgraded its LVS for $5.2 million. The remainder for 2004 was for other technology upgrades.

Cash used in financing activities was $17.3 million in 2005, as compared to $32.7 million in 2004. In 2005, the primary sources of cash were $12.9 million through capital lease transactions and $4.2 million from the exercise of stock options. In 2005 and 2004, the primary use of cash in financing activities was $31.3 million and $40.2 million, respectively, to repurchase outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock under

programs authorized by the Board of Directors. The most recent share repurchase program was authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors in May 2003. As of January 28, 2006, the Company had purchased all the 10 million shares authorized under this program at a cost of $88.5 million.

The increase in operating cash flows in 2004 was due to increased earnings and the increase in accounts payable, offset by decreases in accrued expenses and income taxes payable in 2004. Inventory increased $4.0 million (net of adjustments related to extraordinary gain) in 2004 as compared to a decrease of $5.3 million in 2003. The rate of inventory turn (which is a measure of how fast inventory is sold and is calculated by dividing current year’s cost of sales by average inventory) for 2004 was 2.0 comparing with 2.1 in 2003. Inventory was $86 per square foot at the end of 2004 as compared to $77 per square foot at the end of 2003. The increase in inventory can be attributed to the fact that the Company anticipated greater sales than actually realized in the fourth quarter of 2004. Management does not anticipate significant changes to its inventory turn rates and inventory investment per square foot for the foreseeable future. Income taxes payable decreased $15.2 million due to the recording of a tax benefit of $10.5 million in the second quarter of 2004 and tax payments of $12.5 million compared to a provision of $8.5 million in 2004. The seasonality of the Company’s earnings results in substantially all of income tax payments to be made subsequent to year-end. Accounts payable leveraging (the percentage of merchandise inventory financed by vendor credit terms, e.g., accounts payable divided by merchandise inventory) increased to 83.1% as ofIn January, 29, 2005 compared with 72.0% as of January 31, 2004. The increase in leverage was due to the absence of last year’s inventory related to the acquired Wherehouse stores, which was funded in October 2003 without the corresponding accounts payable, and of which a significant amount was on hand at prior year-end. The decrease in accrued expenses in 2004 of $10.4 million was due to lower accruals for gift cards ($2.7 million), lower accruals for employee incentive costs ($4.1 million) and the absence of accruals for acquisition related costs in 2003 ($1.8 million). See Note 3 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for detail.

Cash used in investing activities was $35.4 million in 2004, as compared to $54.0 million in 2003. In 2004, the primary uses of cash were $33.4 million for capital expenditures and $2.0 million for the acquisition of businesses (see Note 3 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further detail). The majority of the Company’s capital expenditures in 2004 were spent on store improvements, relocations and new store openings. The Company also made investments in technology in its stores including upgrading and maintenance of LVS. The investment in technology was $5.2 million. The remainder of the Company’s capital expenditures in 2004 related to miscellaneous MIS (Management Information Systems) projects. In 2003, primary uses of cash were $37.0 million for the acquisition of businesses (see Note 3 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K) and store improvements, relocations and new store openings. In 2003, the Company made investments of $4.0 million in technology in its stores including upgrading and maintenance of LVS and continued enhancement of the Company’s Web site ~~www.fye.com~~.

Cash used in financing activities was $32.7 million in 2004, as compared to $18.0 million in 2003. In 2004 and 2003, the primary use of cash used in financing activities was $40.2 million and $17.0 million, respectively, to repurchase outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock under programs authorized by the Board of Directors. The current share repurchase program was authorized by the Company’s Board of Directors in May 2003, and allows the Company to repurchase up to 10 million shares of Common Stock from time to time on the open market. As of January 2004, the Company had completed the purchase of 15 million shares of common stock under previously announced programs. As of January 29, 2005, the Company had purchased 6.9 million shares under this plan, at a total cost of $57.2 million, and 3.1 million shares were available for purchase under the current program. In 2004, the Company purchased 3.8 million shares.

Effective March 27, 2006, the Company acquired 335 Musicland stores for a total cash consideration of $104.2 million and $18.1 million in assumed liabilities including certain customer obligations, rent and occupancy liabilities and other employee obligations. See Note 13 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~On January 5,~~ 2006, the Company entered into a new ~~five year,~~five-year, $100 million revolving secured Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A that expires in January 2010. The revolving credit facility contains provisions governing additional indebtedness and acquisitions and is secured by the Company’s eligible inventory, proceeds from the sale of inventory and by the stock of the Company’s subsidiaries. ~~Prior~~In March, 2006, the Company and Bank of America N.A., entered into a First Amendment to the ~~new credit agreement~~Credit Agreement which increased the amount available for borrowing by the Company ~~had~~under the Credit Agreement to $130 million and in October, 2006, the Company and Bank of America N.A. entered into a ~~three year, $100 million secured revolving credit facility with Congress Financial Corporation that would have expired in July 2006. Subsequent~~Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement increasing the amount available to the Company for borrowing to $150 million. The terms and conditions under the aforementioned amendments were the same as the original Credit Agreement.

As of February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, the Company entered into a First Amendment of the Credit Agreement with Bank of America N.A on March 26, 2006, which increases the maximum amount available for borrowing under the revolving secured credit facility to $130 million.

~~As of January 28, 2006~~had $36 thousand and ~~January 29, 2005, the Company had~~ $0.5 ~~million and $0.3~~ million, respectively, in outstanding letter of credit obligations under the credit agreements with Bank of America, ~~N.A and Congress Financial Corporation, respectively.~~N.A. The Company had ~~$99.5~~$150.0 million and ~~$99.7~~$99.5 million, available for borrowing as of February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, ~~and January 29, 2005,~~ respectively. Interest expense in Fiscal 2006 was $5.5 million, of which $2.1 million was incurred for capital leases. Interest expense in Fiscal 2005 was $3.0 million, of which $1.5 million was incurred for capital leases. ~~Interest expense in 2004 was $2.4 million, of which $2.0 million was incurred for capital leases.~~

During Fiscal 2005, the Company financed the replacement of its point-of-sale system through a capital lease arrangement in the amount of $12.0 million. The lease arrangement has an average interest rate of 5.76% and will be repaid in monthly installments of approximately $229,000 ~~over 5 years.~~through June 2010. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, the outstanding balance on the lease was ~~$10.4~~$8.2 million.

During 2005, the Company purchased software licenses through a capital lease arrangement for $0.9 million, with an interest rate of 5.75%. The capital lease will be repaid in quarterly installments of $122,000 over 2 years. As of January 28, 2006, the outstanding balance on the lease was $0.5 million.

During 2005, the Company acquired an 80% interest in a company that is fully consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The Company has committed funding of $3.0 million over a period of three years, of which $1.0 million was funded as of January 28, 2006.

~~During~~Fiscal 2004, the Company borrowed $5.8 million under a mortgage loan to finance the purchase of real estate. The mortgage loan is repayable in monthly installments of $64,000 over 10 years with a fixed interest rate of 6.0% and is collateralized by the real estate. ~~The mortgage loan contains a minimum net worth (shareholders’ equity) covenant of $290 million, excluding the impact, if any, of certain non-cash charges.~~ As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, the outstanding balance on the loan was ~~$5.1~~$4.6 million.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments. The following table summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations ~~at January 28, 2006,~~as of February 3, 2007, and the effect that such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flows in future periods.


Contractual Obligation	2007		2008- 2009		2010 - 2011		2012 and Beyond		Total

$ in thousands
Operating lease obligations	$	116,934	$	163,132	$	70,000	$	48,293	$	398,359
Capital lease obligations		4,831		9,418		4,672		7,392		26,313
Long-term debt (principal)		506		1,107		1,252		1,726		4,591
Long-term debt (interest)		261		427		286		132		1,106
Purchase obligations (1)		—		—		—		—		—
IRS Settlement (3)		7,435		—		—		—		7,435
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities (2)		3,890		1,961		978		938		7,767
Pension benefits		50		115		244		6,091		6,500

Total	$	133,907	$	176,160	$	77,432	$	64,572	$	452,071


(1)	For the purposes of this table, contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. The Company’s purchase orders are based on its current inventory needs and are fulfilled by its suppliers within short time periods.

(2)	Included in deferred rent and other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 3, 2007 are unfavorable lease valuations of $3.0 million and the long-term portion of deferred rent of $7.1 million which are not reflected in the table above as these amounts do not represent contractual obligations. Also included in long-term liabilities is the long-term portion of the straight line rent liability of $8.9 million, which is included in operating lease obligations in the table above.

	Included in deferred rent and other long term liabilities in the table above are the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at the Company’s store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases.

	In March, 2006, the Company acquired an 80% interest in Mix & Burn, LLC which is fully consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The Company has committed funding of $5.2 million of which $4.0 million was funded as of February 3, 2007.

(3)	During 2000, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware issued an opinion upholding the IRS’ disallowance of deductions of interest expense related to corporate-owned life insurance policies through fiscal 1994. During 2003, the Company and the IRS reached a settlement agreement on this issue. Under the final payment terms, the Company has agreed with the IRS to make annual interest payments and a final principal payment of approximately $7.1 million in June 2007. This amount and accrued interest is recorded in income taxes payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The total payment of $7.4 million due in June 2007 includes the final principal payment of approximately $7.1 million and approximately $0.3 million related to annual interest.

(4)	The Company offers a 401(k) Savings Plan to eligible employees (see also Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Total expense related to the Company’s matching contribution was approximately $1,003,000, $957,000 and $897,000 in 2006, 2005 and 2004 respectively. The Company expects to expense and fund an amount in 2007 that is comparable to these historical amounts, however, is not contractually obligated to do so and, as such, no amount is recorded in the table above.

Contractual
Obligation

2006

2007 -
2008

2009 -
2010

2011 and
Beyond

Total

$
in thousands

Operating lease obligations

$
101,583

$
156,691

$
83,373

$
50,596

$
392,243

Capital lease obligations

5,195

9,539

7,418

9,356

31,508

Long-term debt (principal)

477

1,043

1,176

2,368

5,064

Long-term debt (interest)

291

491

358

257

1,397

Purchase obligations (1)

—

—

—

—

—

Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities (2)

1,637

9,797

1,649

1,550

14,633

Pension benefits

50

2,362

2,426

7,101

11,939

Total

$
109,233

$
179,923

$
96,400

$
71,228

$
456,784

~~(1)~~Purchase obligations include all legally binding contracts such as software acquisition/license commitments and legally binding service contracts or other commitments. Purchase orders for inventory and other services are not included in the table above. Purchase orders represent authorization to purchase rather than binding agreements. For the purposes of this table, contractual obligations for purchase of goods or services are defined as agreements that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction. Our purchase orders are based on our current inventory needs and are fulfilled by our suppliers within short time periods.

~~(2)~~As part of a settlement agreement with the IRS, the Company is required to pay interest of approximately $180,000 every six months, through fiscal year 2007, and a final principal payment of $7.1 million in 2007. These payments are pursuant to the settlement of matters with regard to corporate owned life insurance polices and the principal portion is reported in other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 28, 2006. Included in deferred rent and other long-term liabilities are unfavorable lease valuations of $1.0 million and the long-term portion of deferred rent of $8.7 million which are not reflected in the table above as the underlying agreements are not legally binding. Also included in long-term liabilities is the long-term portion of the straight line rent liability of $10.6 million, which is included in operating lease obligations in the table above.

Included in deferred rent and other long term liabilities above, is the long-term liability corresponding to the present value of the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at the Company’s store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases.

During 2005, the Company acquired an 80% interest in a Company that is fully consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The Company has committed funding of $3.0 million over a period of three years, of which $1.0 million was funded as of January 28, 2006 and the remaining obligations are included in deferred rent and other long term liabilities above.

Subsequent to January 28, 2006, the Company acquired an 80% interest in a company that will be fully consolidated for financial reporting purposes in 2006. The Company has committed funding of $5.2 million over a period of two years of which $1.2 million was committed as of March 25, 2006. This commitment has not been included in the table above as it does not represent a contractual obligation as of January 28, 2006.

~~The Company offers a 401(k) Savings Plan to eligible employees (see also Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in~~

this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Total expense related to the Company’s matching contribution was $957,000, $897,000 and $858,000 in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The Company expects to expense and fund an amount in 2006 that is comparable to these historical amounts.

Related Party Transactions.

The Company leases its ~~181,000~~181,300 square foot distribution center/office facility in Albany, New York from Robert J. Higgins, its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and largest shareholder, under three capital leases that expire in the year 2015. The original distribution center/office facility was ~~constructed~~occupied in 1985.

Under the three capital leases, dated April 1, 1985, November 1, 1989 and September 1, 1998 (the “Leases”), the Company paid Mr. Higgins an annual rent of ~~$1.9~~$2.0 million, ~~$1.8~~$1.9 million and $1.8 million in Fiscal 2006, 2005 ~~2004~~ and ~~2003~~2004 respectively. Pursuant to the terms of the lease agreements, effective January 1, 2006 and every two years thereafter, rental payments will increase in accordance with the biennial increase in the Consumer Price Index. Under the terms of the lease agreements, the Company is responsible for property taxes, insurance and other operating costs with respect to the premises. Mr. Higgins’ obligation for principal and interest on his underlying indebtedness relating to the real property is approximately $1.1 million per year. None of the leases contain any real property purchase options at the expiration of their terms.

The Company leases oneof its retail stores from Mr. Higgins under ana long-term operating lease. Annual rental payments under this lease were $40,000 in Fiscal 2006, 2005 ~~2004~~ and ~~2003.~~2004. Under the terms of the lease, the Company pays property taxes, maintenance and a contingent rental if a specified sales level is achieved. Total additional charges for the store, including contingent rent, were approximately $4,100, $4,400 and $14,500 in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and ~~$4,600 in 2005,~~ 2004 ~~and 2003~~ respectively.

The Company regularly utilizes privately chartered aircraft owned or partially owned by Mr. ~~Higgins. Under an unwritten agreement with Quail Aero Services of Syracuse, Inc., a corporation in which Mr.~~ Higgins, ~~holds a 47.5% share, the~~for Company ~~paid $0, $1,000, and $60,000 for chartered aircraft services in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.~~business. The Company ~~also~~ charters an aircraft from Crystal Jet, a corporation wholly-owned by Mr. ~~Higgins.~~Higgins, for Company business. Payments to Crystal Jet aggregated approximately $11,000, $6,000 and $10,000 in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and ~~$13,000 in 2005,~~ 2004, ~~and 2003,~~ respectively. The Company also charters an aircraft from Richmor Aviation, an unaffiliated corporation that leases an aircraft owned by Mr. ~~Higgins.~~Higgins, for Company business. Payments to Richmor Aviation, to charter the aircraft owned by Mr. Higgins, in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004 were approximately $526,000, $276,000 and ~~2003 were $276,000,~~ $314,000, ~~and $235,000,~~ respectively. The Company believes that the charter rates and terms are as favorable to the Company as those generally available to it from other commercial charters.

Michael Solow, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, is a partner of the law firm Kaye Scholer LLP, which rendered legal services to the Company in Fiscal 2004 ~~and 2003~~ for which the Company incurred fees of ~~$115,000 and $202,000 respectively.~~approximately $115,000. Kaye Scholer concluded its representation of the Company in Fiscal 2004.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires that management apply accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect results of operations and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the financial statements. Management continually evaluates its estimates and judgments including those related to merchandise inventory and return costs, valuation of long-lived assets, income taxes, stock-based compensation, and accounting for gift card liability. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K includes a summary of the significant accounting policies and methods used by the Company in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements. Management believes that of the Company’s significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment or complexity:

Merchandise Inventory and Return Costs: ~~Inventory~~ Merchandise inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market as determined by the average cost method. The average cost method attaches a cost to each item and is a blended average of the original purchase price and those of subsequent purchases or other cost adjustments throughout the life cycle of that item.

Inventory valuation requires significant judgment and estimates, including obsolescence, shrink and any adjustments to market value, if market value is lower than cost. Inherent in the entertainment software industry is the risk of obsolete inventory. Typically, newer releases generate a higher product demand. Some vendors offer credits to reduce the cost of products that are selling more slowly, thus allowing for a reduction in the selling price and reducing the possibility for items to become obsolete. The Company records obsolescence and any adjustments to market value (if lower than cost) based on current and anticipated demand, customer preferences, and market conditions. The provision for inventory shrink is estimated as a percentage of sales for the period from the last date a physical inventory was performed to the end of the fiscal year. Such estimates are based on historical results and trends and the shrink results from the last physical inventory. Physical inventories are taken at least annually for all stores throughout the year and inventory records are adjusted accordingly.

Shrink expense, including obsolescence was $14.9 million, $15.1 million and $17.2 million, in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and ~~$14.0 million, in 2005,~~ 2004 ~~and 2003~~ respectively. As a rate to sales, this equaled ~~1.2%~~1.0%, ~~1.3%~~1.2% and ~~1.0%~~1.3%, respectively. The Company expects to realize approximately the same rate of shrink and obsolescence

for the foreseeable future as recorded in ~~2005.~~Fiscal 2006. Presently, a 0.1% change in the rate of shrink and obsolescence provision would equal approximately ~~$1.2~~$0.7 million in additional charge or benefit to cost of sales, based on ~~2005 sales.~~Fiscal 2006 sales since the last physical inventories.

The Company is generally entitled to return merchandise purchased from major vendors for credit against other purchases from these vendors. Certain vendors reduce the credit with a per unit merchandise return charge ~~ranging from 0% to 20% of the original merchandise purchase price~~which varies depending on the type of merchandise being returned. Certain other vendors charge a handling fee based on units returned. The Company records merchandise return charges in cost of sales. The Company incurred merchandise return charges in its fiscal years 2006, 2005 and 2004 ~~and 2003~~ of $3.6 million, $5.6 million and $12.4 million, ~~and $13.5 million,~~ respectively. ~~Merchandise returns decreased 11% in 2005.~~ Return penalties were lower in ~~2005~~Fiscal 2006 than in prior years as the major vendors have decreased the up-front incentives and in turn, lowered the back-end penalty rate. ~~The level of merchandise return charges incurred is directly related to the level of merchandise returns.~~

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets:The Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets to determine if any part of the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that the Company considers to be important when assessing impairment include:


	•	significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results;

	•	significant changes in the manner of the use of acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business;

	•	significant negative industry or economic trends;

•~~significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future operating results;~~

•~~significant changes in the manner of the use of acquired assets or the strategy for the Company’s overall business;~~

•~~significant negative industry or economic trends;~~

If the Company determines that the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable, it tests for impairment to determine if an impairment charge is needed. ~~Impairment~~There were no impairment losses recorded in Fiscal 2006, 2005 2004 and 2003 were $0, $0 and $3.7 million, respectively. The 2003 amount which is reflected in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations represents the write-down of the fixed assets of www.fye.com pursuant to the Company’s decision to outsource the operation of its f.y.e. Web site.or 2004. Losses for store closings in the ordinary course of business represent the write down of the net book value of abandoned fixtures and leasehold improvements. The loss on disposal of fixed assets related to store closings was ~~$2.5~~$2.2 million, $2.4 million and $2.8 million in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and ~~$2.5 million in 2005,~~ 2004, ~~and 2003,~~ respectively, and is included in SG&A ~~expenses. Losses due to~~expenses in the ~~write down~~Consolidated Statement of ~~fixed assets related to store closings are included in Loss~~Operations and loss on disposal of fixed assets in the Consolidated ~~Statements~~Statement of Cash Flows. Store closings usually occur at the expiration of the lease, at which time leasehold improvements, which constitute a majority of the abandoned assets, are fully depreciated. Also, actual store closures usually occur within three to six months of the planned store closure date. ~~As a result, changes in depreciation estimates as required by Accounting Principles Board, Opinion No. 20,~~ ~~Accounting Changes~~ ~~(“APB 20”), do not have a material impact on financial results.~~

Income Taxes:Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

Accounting for income taxes requires management to make estimates and judgments regarding interpretation of various taxing jurisdictions, laws and regulations as well as the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets. These estimates and judgments include the generation of future taxable income, viable tax planning strategies and support of tax filings. Valuation allowances are recorded against deferred tax assets if, based upon management’s estimates of realizability, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of these deferred tax assets will not be realized. For additional discussion regarding income taxes, refer to Note 6 in Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Stock-based Compensation:~~For periods 2005 and prior,~~ The Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment”, or SFAS 123(R), in the first quarter of 2006 required that the Company ~~applied~~recognize stock-based compensation expense associated with the ~~intrinsic value-based method~~vesting of ~~accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No.25,~~ ~~Accounting for Stock Issued~~share based instruments in the statement of operations. Determining the amount of stock-based compensation to ~~Employees~~,~~and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44,~~ ~~Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation – An Interpretation~~be recorded requires the Company to develop estimates to be used in calculating the grant-date fair value of ~~APB No.25, in accounting for its fixed plan~~ stock options. ~~Under this method,~~The Company calculate the grant-date fair values using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Black-Scholes model requires the Company to make estimates of the following assumptions:

Expected volatility—The estimated stock price volatility was derived based upon the Company’s actual historic stock prices over the expected life of the options, which represents the Company’s best estimate of expected volatility.

Expected option life—The Company’s estimate of an expected option life was calculated based on actual historical data relating to grants, exercises and cancellations.

Risk-free interest rate—The Company used the yield on zero-coupon U.S. Treasury securities for a period that is commensurate with the expected life assumption as the risk-free interest rate.

The amount of stock-based compensation ~~expense would be recorded~~recognized during a period is based on the ~~date~~value of the portion of the awards that are ultimately expected to vest. SFAS 123(R) requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The term “forfeitures” is distinct from “cancellations” or “expirations” and represents only if the ~~current market price~~unvested portion of the ~~underlying stock exceeded~~surrendered option. The Company reviewed historical forfeiture data and determined the ~~exercise price. Unearned compensation recognized for restricted stock awards is shown~~appropriate forfeiture rate based on that data. The Company will re-evaluate this analysis periodically and adjust the forfeiture rate as ~~a separate component of shareholders’ equity and is amortized to~~necessary. Ultimately, the Company will recognize the actual expense over the vesting period ofonly for the ~~stock award using the straight-line method. SFAS No.123,~~ ~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation~~~~, as amended by SFAS No.148,~~ ~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure,~~ established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS No.123, the Company elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No.123 and SFAS No.148. The Company adopted the expense recognition provisions of SFAS No.123(R), effective for fiscal 2006shares that ~~began on January 29, 2006.~~

vest.

In December 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of previously granted unvested annual options awarded to employees and officers under the Company’s Stock Option Plans which had exercise prices greater than $10.00 per share. Options to purchase 2.3 million shares became exercisable immediately, representing 24% of total options outstanding, as a result of the vesting acceleration. The decision to accelerate vesting of these stock options was made primarily to avoid recognizing compensation expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in future financial statements upon the adoption of SFAS No.123 (R), ~~Share-Based Payment,~~ ~~which the~~

Company will adopt on January 29, 2006. The acceleration of vesting of these stock options resulted in compensation expenses of $5.9 million, in the pro forma net income (loss) results (see Note 1 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).

Accounting for Gift Card Liability:The Company sells gift cards that are redeemable only for merchandise and have no expiration date. The Company derecognizes card liability when either ~~cu stomers~~customers redeem cards, at which point the Company records revenue; or the Company determines it does not have a legal obligation to remit unredeemed cards to the relevant jurisdictions and the likelihood of the cards being

redeemed becomes remote, at which point the Company records breakage as a credit to SG&A expenses. The Company’s accounting for gift cards is based on estimating the Company’s liability for future card redemptions asat the end of a reporting ~~period end.~~period. Estimated liability is equal to two years of unredeemed cards, plus an amount for outstanding cards that may possibly be redeemed for the cumulative look-back period, exclusive of the last two years. The Company’s ability to reasonably and reliably estimate the liability is based on historical redemption experience with gift cards and similar types of arrangements and the existence of a large volume of relatively homogeneous transactions. The Company’s estimate is not susceptible to significant external factors and the circumstances around gift card sales and redemptions have not changed significantly over time.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements.

In February ~~2006,~~2007, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ~~SFAS~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. ~~155,~~ 159,~~Accounting~~The Fair Value Option for ~~Certain Hybrid~~ Financial ~~Instruments -~~Assets and Financial Liabilities – including an amendment of FASB ~~Statements~~Statement No. ~~133 and 140~~115~~, to simplify and make more consistent the accounting for certain financial instruments. Specifically,~~. SFAS No. ~~155 amends~~159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective of the statement is to provide entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. ~~133,~~ ~~Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities~~~~, to permit fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument with an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, provided that the whole instrument~~159 is ~~accounted for on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 140,~~ ~~Accounting for Transfers and Servicing~~effective as of ~~Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities~~, to allow a qualifying special-purpose entity to hold a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS No. 155 applies to all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s ~~first~~ fiscal year ~~that begins~~beginning after ~~September~~November 15, ~~2006, with earlier application allowed.~~2007. The adoption of SFAS ~~No.155~~No. 159 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s ~~consolidated financial position or results of operations.~~Consolidated Financial Statements.

In ~~May 2005,~~September 2006, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. ~~154,~~ 157,~~Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and FASB Statement No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements~~Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. ~~154 provides guidance on the~~157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting ~~for~~principles (GAAP), and reporting of accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes, unless impracticable, retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the absence of explicit transition requirements specific to the newly adopted accounting principle.expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. ~~154 also provides guidance~~157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, however, does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for ~~determining whether retrospective application of a change in accounting principle is impracticable~~financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and ~~for reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable.~~interim periods within those fiscal years. The ~~provisions~~adoption of SFAS No. ~~154 are effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS No. 154~~157 is not expected to have a ~~material~~significant impact on the Company’s ~~consolidated financial condition or results of operations.~~Consolidated Financial Statements.

In ~~June 2005,~~July 2006, the ~~Emerging Issues Task Force~~FASB issued Interpretation No. (“~~EITF”~~FIN”) ~~issued EITF~~48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. ~~05-6,~~ ~~Determining~~109, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the ~~Amortization Period~~financial statement recognition and measurement of ~~Leasehold Improvements (purchased after lease inception)~~a tax position taken or ~~Acquired~~expected to be taken in a ~~Business Combination (“EITF 05-6”). EITF 05-6 provides that~~tax return. In particular, this interpretation requires uncertain tax positions to be recognized only if they are “more-likely-than-not” to be upheld based on their technical merits. Additionally, the ~~amortization period for leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or purchased after the inception of a lease be the shorter of (a) the useful life~~measurement of the ~~assets or (b)~~tax position will be based on the largest amount that is determined to have greater than a ~~term that includes required lease periods and renewals that are reasonably assured~~50% likelihood of realization upon ~~the acquisition~~ultimate settlement. Any resulting cumulative effect of applying the ~~purchase. The~~ provisions of ~~EITF 05-6 are~~FIN 48 upon adoption would be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. FIN 48 will be effective ~~on a prospective basis~~ for ~~leasehold improvements purchased or acquired~~the Company’s fiscal year beginning ~~July 1, 2005.~~February 4, 2007. The ~~adoption~~Company is currently evaluating the impact of ~~EITF 05-6 did not have a material effect~~this interpretation on the Company’s ~~consolidated financial position or results of operations.~~Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No.123(R),~~ ~~Share-Based Payment: an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95.~~ SFAS No.123(R) requires an enterprise to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award at the grant date (with limited exceptions) and recognize the compensation cost over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No.107 (“SAB 107”), which expresses views of the SEC staff regarding the application of SFAS No.123(R). Among other things, SAB 107 provides interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS No.123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations, and provides the SEC staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. In February 2006, the FASB published FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-4 (“FSP No.123(R)-4”), ~~Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event~~, to amend guidance in SFAS No.123(R), on classifying options and similar instruments issued as part of employee compensation arrangements. As amended, SFAS No.123(R) requires options issued as compensation to employees to be classified as liabilities if the cash settlement feature can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control, and such event is deemed probable to occur. The Company will adopt the expense recognition provisions of SFAS No.123(R) in its first quarter of fiscal 2006 which began on January 29, 2006. If the Company had applied the provisions of SFAS No.123(R) to the financial statements for the period ended January 28, 2006, net loss would have been greater by approximately $7.3 million or $(0.23) per share.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company does not hold any financial instruments that expose it to significant market risk and does not engage in hedging activities. To the extent the Company borrows under its revolving credit facility, the Company is subject to risk resulting from interest rate fluctuations since interest on the Company’s borrowings under its revolving credit facility can be variable. If interest rates on the Company’s revolving credit facility were to increase by 25 basis points, and to the extent borrowings were outstanding, for every $1,000,000 outstanding on the facility, income before income taxes would be reduced by $2,500 per year. Information about the fair value of financial instruments is included in Note 1of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The index to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements is included in Item 15, and the Consolidated Financial Statements follow the signature page to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.

The quarterly results of operations are included herein in Note 12 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, in that they provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit, under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting: Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d – 15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) inInternal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our evaluation under the framework inInternal Control- Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of ~~January 28, 2006.~~February 3, 2007.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, ~~have~~has issued an audit report on the Company’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, which is included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference.

Changes in Controls and Procedures:No change in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarterly period ended ~~January 28, 2006~~February 3, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

No events have occurred which would require disclosure under this Item.

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, ~~AND~~ EXECUTIVE OFFICERS ~~OF THE REGISTRANT~~AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

(a) Identification of Directors

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the captions “Election of Directors” and ~~“Board~~“Compensation of ~~Directors Meetings and Its Committees”~~Directors” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s ~~2006~~2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after ~~January 28, 2006.~~

February 3, 2007.

(b) Identification of Executive Officers

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption “Executive ~~Officers and~~ Compensation” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s ~~2006~~2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after ~~January 28, 2006.~~

February 3, 2007.

We have adopted the Trans World Entertainment Corporation Code of Ethics that applies to all officers, directors, employees and consultants of the Company. The Code of Ethics is intended to comply with Item 406 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and with applicable rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc. Our Code of Ethics is posted on our Internet website under the “Corporate” page. Our Internet website address is www.twec.com. To the extent required or permitted by the rules of the SEC and ~~Nasdaq,~~NASDAQ, we will disclose amendments and waivers relating to our Code of Ethics in the same place as our website.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED ~~STOCKHOLDER~~SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the captions “Equity Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers” and “Principal Shareholders” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s ~~2006~~2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after ~~January 28, 2006.~~

February 3, 2007.

Information on Trans World Entertainment Common Stock authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is contained in our Proxy Statement for our ~~2006~~2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders under the caption “Stock Option Plans” and is incorporated herein by reference. See Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of the Company’s employee stock ~~option~~award plans.

The following table contains information about the Company’s Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants and rights under all of the Company’s equity compensation plans as of February 3, 2007:



Plan Category	Number of Shares to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights	Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights	Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights)

	(Shares in thousands)

Equity Compensation Plan Approved by Shareholders	10,059	$8.70	4,454
Equity Compensation Plans and Agreements not Approved by Shareholders	—	—	—

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption “Related Party Transactions” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s ~~2006~~2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after ~~January 28, 2006.~~February 3, 2007.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ~~ACCOUNTING~~ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Incorporated herein by reference is the information appearing under the caption “Other Matters” in the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s ~~2006~~2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after ~~January 28, 2006.~~

28February 3, 2007.

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES ~~AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K~~

15(a) (1) Financial Statements

The ~~consolidated financial statements~~Consolidated Financial Statements and ~~notes~~Notes are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this report.

15(a) (2) Financial Statement Schedules

Consolidated ~~financial statement schedules~~Financial Statement Schedules not filed herein have been omitted as they are not applicable or the required information or equivalent information has been included in the ~~consolidated financial statements~~Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

15(a) (3) Exhibits

Exhibits are as set forth in the “Index to Exhibits” which follows the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and immediately precedes the exhibits filed.

~~15(b) Reports on Form 8-K~~

A Form 8-K was filed on November 10, 2005, incorporating by reference Trans World Entertainment’s November 10, 2005 press release announcing the Company’s financial results for its third quarter ended October 29, 2005.

A Form 8-K/A was filed on December 21, 2005, incorporating by reference Trans World Entertainment’s press release dated December 20, 2006, announcing the acceleration of vesting of “underwater” unvested stock options held by employees and executive officers.

A Form 8-K was filed on January 4, 2006, incorporating be reference Trans World Entertainment’s January 4, 2006 press release announcing the Company’s financial results for the five and nine-week periods ending December 31, 2005.

A Form 8-K was filed on January 10, 2006, incorporating be reference Trans World Entertainment’s January 5, 2006 press release announcing the Company’s new five year, $100 million revolving secured credit facility agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A.

A Form 8-K was filed on February 22, 2006, incorporating by reference Trans World Entertainment’s February 17, 2006 entry into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Musicland Holding Corp. and the related press release announcing the same event.

A Form 8-K was filed on March 9, 2006, incorporating by reference Trans World Entertainment’s March 9, 2006 press release announcing the Company’s financial results for its fourth quarter and year ended January 28, 2006.

A Form 8-K was filed on March 23, 2006, incorporating by reference Trans World Entertainment’s March 22, 2006 press release announcing the approval by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York of the Company’s bid to acquire all of the assets of Musicland Holding Corp.

A Form 8-K was filed on March 29, 2006, incorporating by reference Trans World Entertainment’s March 29, 2006 press release announcing the completion of the Company’s acquisition of Musicland stores and the First Amendment to the Company’s Credit Agreement with Bank of America N.A.

A Form 8-K was filed on March 30, 2006, incorporating by reference Trans World Entertainment’s March 30, 2006 press release announcing the Company’s acquisition of a majority interest in Mix and Burn LLC, a provider of digital content services.

~~15(c) Exhibits~~

~~Exhibits are as set forth in the “Index to Exhibits” which follows the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and immediately precedes the exhibits filed.~~

~~15(d) Other Financial Statements~~

~~Not applicable.~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

Date: April 19, 2007		By: /s/ ROBERT J. HIGGINS

~~Date:~~	~~April 13, 2006~~		~~By: /s/ ROBERT J. HIGGINS~~
			Robert J. Higgins
			Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

~~Name~~	~~Title~~
Name	Title		Date

/s/ ROBERT J. HIGGINS				Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007
~~(Robert J. Higgins)~~	(Principal Executive Officer)
(Robert J. Higgins)

/s/ JOHN J. SULLIVAN		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal		April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007
	Financial and Chief Accounting Officer) and Secretary
~~(John~~(John J. Sullivan)

/s/ BRETT BREWER	Director		April 19, 2007

(~~Principal Financial and Chief Accounting Officer) and Secretary~~Brett Brewer)

/s/ MARK A. COHEN		Director		April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007

~~(Mark~~(Mark A. Cohen)

/s/ MARTIN E. HANAKA		Director		April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007

~~(Martin~~(Martin E. Hanaka)

/s/ ISAAC KAUFMAN		Director		April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007

~~(Isaac~~(Isaac Kaufman)

/s/ DR. JOSEPH G. MORONE	Director		April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007

~~(Dr.~~(Dr. Joseph G. Morone)

/s/ LORI SCHAFER		Director		April ~~13, 2005~~19, 2007

~~(Lori~~(Lori Schafer)

/s/ MICHAEL B. SOLOW		Director		April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007

~~(Michael~~(Michael B. Solow)

/s/ EDMOND THOMAS		Director		April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007

~~(Edmond~~(Edmond Thomas)

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


		Form 10-K Page No.

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2

Consolidated Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets at February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006 ~~and January 29, 2005~~		F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations - Fiscal years ended February 3, 2007, January 28, 2006, and January 29, 2005 ~~and January 31, 2004~~		F-5

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Fiscal years ended February 3, 2007, January 28, 2006, and January 29, 2005 ~~and January 31, 2004~~		F-6

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Fiscal years ended February 3, 2007, January 28, 2006, and January 29, 2005 ~~and January 31, 2004~~		F-7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-8

~~F-1~~

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders

Trans World Entertainment Corporation:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) as of February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, ~~and January 29, 2005,~~ and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended ~~January 28, 2006.~~February 3, 2007. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, ~~and January 29, 2005,~~ and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

As discussed in ~~note 2~~Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, during 2006 the Company changed its ~~method~~methods of accounting for ~~conditional asset retirement~~pension and other postretirement benefit obligations ~~associated with operating leases, effective January 28, 2006.~~

and for share-based compensation.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Trans World Entertainment Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective operation of internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ KPMG LLP

~~/s/ KPMG LLP~~

~~Albany, New York~~
~~April 13, 2006~~

~~F-2~~Albany, New York
April 19, 2007

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

Trans World Entertainment Corporation:

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the ~~audit~~audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO. Also, in our opinion, Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, based on criteria established inInternal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries as of February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, and ~~January 29, 2005, and the~~ related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, and our report dated April ~~13, 2006~~19, 2007 expressed aan unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ KPMG LLP

~~/s/ KPMG LLP~~


~~Albany, New York~~
~~April 13, 2006~~

~~F-3~~Albany, New York
April 19, 2007

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

($ in thousands)


	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	118,630		$	197,209
Accounts receivable		7,874			8,671
Merchandise inventory		504,860			402,712
Income taxes receivable		—			892
Prepaid expenses and other		5,953			6,083
Deferred taxes		9,039			11,266

Total current assets		646,356			626,833


FIXED ASSETS, net		138,252			131,798

DEFERRED TAXES		32,715			27,511
OTHER ASSETS		12,367			13,515

TOTAL ASSETS	$	829,690		$	799,657


LIABILITIES
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	311,372		$	307,687
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		51,741			41,864
Income taxes payable		13,646			—
Current portion of long-term debt		506			477
Current portion of capital lease obligations		2,887			3,182

Total current liabilities		380,152			353,210


LONG –TERM DEBT, less current portion		4,085			4,587
CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, less current portion		12,000			14,887
DEFERRED RENT AND OTHER LIABILITIES		40,248			48,461

TOTAL LIABILITIES		436,485			421,145


SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued)		—			—
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 55,998,109 shares and 55,727,575 shares issued, respectively)		560			557
Additional paid-in capital		301,526			298,699
Unearned compensation – restricted stock		—			(30	)
Treasury stock at cost (25,103,990 and 25,104,990 shares, respectively)		(217,560	)		(217,564	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(1,888	)		(2,048	)
Retained earnings		310,567			298,898

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		393,205			378,512

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	829,690		$	799,657

January 28,
2006

January 29,
2005

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents

$
197,209

$
229,768

Accounts receivable

8,671

6,202

Merchandise inventory

402,712

431,246

Income taxes receivable

892

—

Prepaid expenses and other

5,737

6,804

Deferred taxes

11,266

15,526

Total current assets

626,487

689,546

FIXED ASSETS, net

132,464

130,196

DEFERRED TAXES

27,511

25,230

OTHER ASSETS

13,861

14,681

TOTAL ASSETS

$
800,323

$
859,653

LIABILITIES

CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accounts payable

$
322,831

$
358,396

Income taxes payable

—

8,592

Accrued expenses and other

42,530

43,712

Current portion of long-term debt

477

448

Current portion of capital lease obligations

3,182

332

Total current liabilities

369,020

411,480

LONG —TERM DEBT, less current portion

4,587

5,060

CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS, less current portion

14,887

6,977

DEFERRED RENT AND OTHER LIABILITIES

33,317

31,813

TOTAL LIABILITIES

421,811

455,330

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred stock ($0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued)

—

—

Common stock ($0.01 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 55,727,575 shares and 55,014,598 shares issued in 2005 and 2004, respectively)

557

550

Additional paid-in capital

298,699

292,922

Unearned compensation – restricted stock

(30
)
(46
)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(2,048
)
(1,094
)
Treasury stock at cost (25,104,990 and 21,988,949 shares in 2005 and 2004, respectively)

(217,564
)
(186,298
)
Retained earnings

298,898

298,289

TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

378,512

404,323

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

$
800,323

$
859,653

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~F-4~~

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Fiscal Year Ended

	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006			January 29, 2005


Sales	$	1,471,157		$	1,238,486		$	1,365,133
Cost of sales		951,935			806,873			869,999

Gross profit		519,222			431,613			495,134
Selling, general and administrative expenses		519,246			426,854			450,162

(Loss) income from operations		(24	)		4,759			44,972
Interest expense		5,504			2,954			2,444
Other income		(4,435	)		(2,171	)		(1,039	)

(Loss) income before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		(1,093	)		3,976			43,567
Income tax (benefit) expense		(2,041	)		1,090			4,892

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		948			2,886			38,675
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes of $6,739, $0 and $1,979 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively		10,721			—			3,166
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes of $0, $1,505 and $0 in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.		—			(2,277	)		—

NET INCOME	$	11,669		$	609		$	41,841

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.03		$	0.09		$	1.12
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill		0.35			—			0.09
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		—			(0.07	)		—

Basic earnings per share	$	0.38		$	0.02		$	1.21


Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic		30,797			31,962			34,531


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:
Earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.03		$	0.09		$	1.06
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill		0.33			—			0.09
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		—			(0.07	)		—

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.36		$	0.02		$	1.15


Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted		31,986			32,132			36,297

Fiscal Year Ended

January 28,
2006

January 29,
2005

January 31,
2004

Sales

$
1,238,486

$
1,365,133

$
1,330,626

Cost of sales

806,873

869,999

842,726

Gross profit

431,613

495,134

487,900

Selling, general and administrative expenses

426,854

450,162

459,441

Income from operations

4,759

44,972

28,459

Interest expense

2,954

2,444

2,147

Other income

(2,171
)
(1,039
)
(718
)
Income before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

3,976

43,567

27,030

Income tax expense

1,090

4,892

8,302

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

2,886

38,675

18,728

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes of $1,979 and $2,437 in 2004 and 2003, respectively

—

3,166

4,339

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes of $1,505 million in 2005

(2,277
)
—

—

NET INCOME

$
609

$
41,841

$
23,067

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
1.12

$
0.50

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill

—

0.09

0.12

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

(0.07
)
—

—

Basic earnings per share

$
0.02

$
1.21

$
0.62

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – basic

31,962

34,531

37,422

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
1.06

$
0.49

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill

—

0.09

0.11

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

(0.07
)
—

—

Diluted earnings per share

$
0.02

$
1.15

$
0.60

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding – diluted

32,132

36,297

38,209

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~F-5~~

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

($ in thousands)


	Common Shares		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Unearned Compensation Restricted Stock			Treasury Shares			Treasury Stock At Cost			Accum. Other Comp. Loss			Retained Earnings		Shareholders’ Equity

Balance as of January 31, 2004		54,246	$	542	$	288,272		$	(23	)		(18,147	)	$	(146,055	)		—		$	256,448	$	399,184

Comprehensive income:

Net income		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			41,841		41,841

Excess of additional minimum pension liability over unrecognized prior service cost, net of income taxes of $747		—		—		—			—			—			—		$	(1,094	)		—		(1,094	)

Total comprehensive income																							40,747

Repurchase of shares of treasury stock		—		—		—			—			(3,843	)		(40,247	)		—			—		(40,247	)

Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs		—		—		6			—			1			4			—			—		10

Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted stock		—		—		—			28			—			—			—			—		28

Issuance of restricted stock		5		—		51			(51	)		—			—			—			—		—

Issuance of stock to Directors		12		—		52			—			—			—			—			—		52

Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit		752		8		4,541			—			—			—			—			—		4,549

Balance as of January 29, 2005		55,015	$	550	$	292,922		$	(46	)		(21,989	)	$	(186,298	)	$	(1,094	)	$	298,289	$	404,323

Comprehensive loss:

Net income		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			609		609

Excess of additional minimum pension liability over unrecognized prior service cost, net of income taxes of $741		—		—		—			—			—			—			(954	)		—		(954	)

Total comprehensive loss																							(345	)

Repurchase of shares of treasury stock		—		—		—			—			(3,117	)		(31,270	)		—			—		(31,270	)

Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs		—		—		3			—			1			4			—			—		7

Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted stock		—		—		—			16			—			—			—			—		16

Stock compensation and related tax benefit		713		7		5,774			—			—			—			—			—		5,781

Balance as of January 28, 2006		55,728	$	557	$	298,699		$	(30	)		(25,105	)	$	(217,564	)	$	(2,048	)	$	298,898	$	378,512

Comprehensive income:

Net income		—		—		—			—			—			—			—			11,669		11,669
Additional pension liability adjustment, net of income taxes of $1,771		—		—		—			—			—			—			2,445			—		2,445

Total comprehensive income																							14,114

Adjustment to initially apply SFAS 158, net of income taxes of $1,623		—		—		—			—			—			—			(2,285	)		—		(2,285	)
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs		—		—		2			—			1			4			—			—		6
Stock compensation and related tax benefit		270		3		2,842			—			—			—			—			—		2,845

Reclassification of unearned compensation upon adoption of SFAS 123(R)		—		—		(30	)		30			—			—			—			—		—
Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted stock		—		—		13			—			—			—			—			—		13

Balance as of February 3, 2007		55,998	$	560	$	301,526		$	—			(25,104	)	$	(217,560	)	$	(1,888	)	$	310,567	$	393,205

Common
Shares

Stock
Amount

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Unearned
Compensation
Restricted
Stock

Treasury
Shares

Stock
Amount

Accum.
Other
Comp.
Loss

Retained
Earnings

Shareholders’
Equity

Balance as of February 1, 2003

54,046

$
540

$
287,402

$
(116
)
(15,105
)
$
(129,103
)
—

$
233,381

$
392,104

Net income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

23,067

23,067

Repurchase of shares of treasury stock

—

—

—

—

(3,042
)
(16,952
)
—

—

(16,952
)
Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted stock

—

—

—

93

—

—

—

—

93

Issuance of stock to Directors

—

—

50

—

—

—

—

—

50

Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit

200

2

820

—

—

—

—

—

822

Balance as of January 31, 2004

54,246

$
542

$
288,272

$
(23
)
(18,147
)
$
(146,055
)
—

$
256,448

$
399,184

Comprehensive income:

Net income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

41,841

41,841

Excess of additional minimum pension liability over unrecognized prior service cost, net of income taxes of $747

—

—

—

—

—

—

$
(1,094
)
—

(1,094
)
Total comprehensive income

40,747

Repurchase of shares of treasury stock

—

—

—

—

(3,843
)
(40,247
)
—

—

(40,247
)
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs

—

—

6

—

1

4

—

—

10

Amortization of unearned compensation — restricted stock

—

—

—

28

—

—

—

—

28

Issuance of restricted stock

5

—

51

(51
)
—

—

—

—

—

Issuance of stock to Directors

12

—

52

—

—

—

—

—

52

Exercise of stock options and related tax benefit

752

8

4,541

—

—

—

—

—

4,549

Balance as of January 29, 2005

55,015

$
550

$
292,922

$
(46
)
(21,989
)
$
(186,298
)
$
(1,094
)
$
298,289

$
404,323

Comprehensive income (loss):

Net income

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

609

609

Excess of additional minimum pension liability over unrecognized prior service cost, net of income taxes of $741

—

—

—

—

—

—

(954
)
—

(954
)
Total comprehensive loss

(345
)
Repurchase of shares of treasury stock

—

—

—

—

(3,117
)
(31,270
)
—

—

(31,270
)
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs

—

—

3

—

1

4

—

—

7

Amortization of unearned compensation – restricted stock

—

—

—

16

—

—

—

—

16

Stock compensation and related tax benefit

713

7

5,774

—

—

—

—

—

5,781

Balance as of January 28, 2006

55,728

$
557

$
298,699

$
(30
)
(25,105
)
$
(217,564
)
$
(2,048
)
$
298,898

$
378,512

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~F-6~~

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

($ in thousands)


	Fiscal Year Ended

	February 3,			January 28,			January 29,
	2007			2006			2005

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	11,669		$	609		$	41,841
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets		40,099			37,216			39,796
Amortization of intangible assets		263			94			—
Amortization of lease valuations, net		(3,150	)		(428	)		(844	)
Stock compensation programs		2,191			319			90
Loss on disposal of fixed assets		2,243			2,391			2,848
Gain on sale of available for sale securities and other investments		(3,528	)		(813	)		—
Deferred tax (benefit) expense		(4,387	)		4,186			6,948
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income taxes		—			2,277			—
Extraordinary gain on acquisition of businesses, net of income taxes		(10,721	)		—			(3,166	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:
Accounts receivable		819			(2,469	)		2,980
Merchandise inventory		10,520			28,534			(4,009	)
Prepaid expenses and other		146			1,067			(104	)
Other assets		(490	)		544			(2,730	)
Accounts payable		3,804			(38,776	)		48,080
Income taxes receivable/payable		2,247			(7,863	)		(15,151	)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		(3,305	)		(2,831	)		(10,442	)
Deferred rent and other liabilities		(1,152	)		1,190			(206	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		47,268			25,247			105,931

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of fixed assets		(48,289	)		(41,330	)		(33,398	)
Acquisition of businesses		(78,810	)		—			(2,000	)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities and other investments		4,228			813			—

Net cash used by investing activities		(122,871	)		(40,517	)		(35,398	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from long-term debt		—			—			5,760
Proceeds from capital lease obligations		—			12,877			—
Payments of long-term debt		(473	)		(444	)		(252	)
Payments of capital lease obligations		(3,182	)		(2,117	)		(551	)
Payments of debt issue costs		—			(495	)
Payments for purchases of treasury stock		—			(31,270	)		(40,247	)
Excess tax benefit from stock award exercises		36			—			—
Proceeds from exercise of stock awards		643			4,160			2,603

Net cash used by financing activities		(2,976	)		(17,289	)		(32,687	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(78,579	)		(32,559	)		37,846
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		197,209			229,768			191,922

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	118,630		$	197,209		$	229,768

Supplemental disclosures and non-cash investing and financing activities:
Issuance of treasury stock under incentive stock programs	$	6		$	7		$	10
Issuance of deferred / restricted shares under deferred / restricted stock plans		105			—			51
Income tax benefit resulting from exercises of stock options		—			1,621			1,946
Interest paid		5,529			2,901			2,331

Fiscal Year Ended

January 28,

January 29,

January 31,

2006

2005

2004

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income

$
609

$
41,841

$
23,067

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets

37,069

39,796

40,539

Amortization of intangible assets

94

47

—

Amortization of lease valuations, net

(428
)
(844
)
(893
)
Stock compensation programs

319

90

143

Loss on disposal of fixed assets

2,538

2,848

2,544

Loss on impairment of fixed assets

—

—

3,682

Gain on sale of available for sale securities

(813
)
—

—

Deferred tax expense (benefit)

4,186

6,948

(4,106
)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income taxes

2,277

—

—

Extraordinary gain on acquisition of businesses, net of income taxes

—

(3,166
)
(4,339
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects of acquisitions:

Accounts receivable

(2,469
)
2,980

1,009

Merchandise inventory

28,534

(4,009
)
5,275

Prepaid expenses and other

1,067

(104
)
(1,218
)
Other assets

544

(2,777
)
(353
)
Accounts payable

(35,565
)
52,098

(20,661
)
Income taxes receivable/(payable)

(7,863
)
(15,151
)
12,479

Accrued expenses and other

(2,831
)
(10,442
)
12,849

Deferred rent and other liabilities

(2,021
)
(4,224
)
(3,134
)
Net cash provided by operating activities

25,247

105,931

66,883

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Purchases of fixed assets

(41,330
)
(33,398
)
(16,989
)
Acquisition of businesses

—

(2,000
)
(37,044
)
Proceeds from sale of available-for-sale securities

813

—

—

Net cash used by investing activities

(40,517
)
(35,398
)
(54,033
)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Proceeds from long-term debt

—

5,760

—

Proceeds from capital lease obligations

12,877

—

—

Payments of long-term debt

(444
)
(252
)
—

Payments of capital lease obligations

(2,117
)
(551
)
(1,640
)
Payments of debt issue costs

(495
)

Payments for purchases of treasury stock

(31,270
)
(40,247
)
(16,952
)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options

4,160

2,603

614

Net cash used by financing activities

(17,289
)
(32,687
)
(17,978
)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(32,559
)
37,846

(5,128
)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

229,768

191,922

197,050

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

197,209

229,768

$
191,922

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:

Issuance of stock under incentive stock programs

$
7

$
10

—

Issuance of restricted shares under restricted stock plan

—

51

—

Income tax benefit resulting from exercises of stock options

1,621

1,946

208

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~F-7~~

TRANS WORLD ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations: Trans World Entertainment Corporation and subsidiaries (“the Company”) is one of the largest specialty retailers of entertainment software, including music, home video, video games and related products in the United States. The Company operates a chain of retail entertainment stores and e-commerce sites,www.fye.com,~~www.coconuts.com,~~ www.wherehouse.com,www.secondspin.com,www.samgoody.com and~~www.secondspin.com,~~www.suncoast.com in a single industry segment. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, the Company operated ~~782~~992 stores totaling approximately ~~4.8~~6.0 million square feet in ~~46 states,~~the United States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin ~~Islands, with a majority of the stores concentrated in the eastern half of the United States.~~Islands. The Company’s business is seasonal in nature, with the peak selling period being the holiday season in the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter.

Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements consist of Trans World Entertainment Corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiary, Record Town, Inc. (“Record Town”), and Record Town’s subsidiaries, all of which are wholly-owned. During Fiscal 2006 and 2005, the Company acquired an 80% ~~interest~~interests in ~~a newly formed company~~two companies that isare fully consolidated for financial reporting purposes. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Certain amounts in previously issued consolidated financial statements were reclassified to conform to ~~2005~~2006 presentation. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Items Affecting Comparability:The Company’s fiscal year is a 52 or 53-week period ending the Saturday nearest to January 31. Fiscal 2006, 2005, and 2004 ~~and 2003~~ ended February 3, 2007, January 28, 2006, and January 29, 2005, respectively. Fiscal 2006 had 53 weeks and ~~January 31,~~2005 and 2004 ~~respectively, and each fiscal year consisted of~~had 52 weeks. The 53^rd week in Fiscal 2006 contributed approximately $23.0 million in sales.

OnThe Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R), effective February ~~7, 2005~~3, 2007. In accordance with SFAS No. 158, the ~~Office~~Company recorded a liability equal to the underfunded status of the ~~Chief Accountant~~Company sponsored Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) and “Director Retirement Plan” as of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a clarification of their interpretation of certain accounting issues and their application under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles relating to operating leases. After an internal review and discussion with its independent auditors, the Company determined its then current method of accounting for allowances provided by landlords to fund leasehold improvements needed to be revised. Historically, the Company accounted for these allowances as reductions to the related leasehold improvements on its Consolidated Balance Sheets and as a reduction of related investing activities on its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Management revised its method of accounting in 2004 for these allowances to record them as deferred credits (“deferred rent”) on its Consolidated Balance Sheets and as a component of operating activities on its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.November 1, 2006 measurement date. See Note 49 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed discussion.

Effective January 29, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, using the modified prospective transition method. Under this transition method, compensation cost recognized during 2006 includes compensation expense for all stock-based awards granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 29, 2006 as well as awards granted in Fiscal 2006, based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123. Results for prior periods have not been restated, as allowed for under the modified prospective transition method.

For periods 2005 and prior, the Company applied the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25,Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation – An Interpretation of APB No. 25, in accounting for its fixed plan stock options. Under this method, compensation expense would be recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeded the exercise price. Unearned compensation recognized for restricted stock awards is amortized to expense over the vesting period of the stock award using the straight-line method. SFAS No. 123,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, as amended by SFAS No. 148,Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation plans. As allowed by SFAS No. 123, prior to 2006, the Company elected to continue to apply the intrinsic value-based method of accounting described above, and adopted the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 and SFAS No.148.

The Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 47Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, effective January 28, 2006. In accordance with FIN 47, the Company recorded an asset and a corresponding liability for the present value of the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at its store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed discussion.

~~Revenue Recognition:~~Concentration of Business Risks:The ~~Company’s revenue is primarily~~Company purchases merchandise inventory for its stores from ~~retail~~approximately 990 suppliers, with approximately 68% of purchases being made from ten suppliers including EMI Music Distribution, Sony-Bertelsmann Music Group, Warner/Electra/Atlantic Corp., Universal Music and Video Distribution, Fox Video Inc., Paramount Home Video, Buena Vista Home Video, Warner Home Entertainment, Universal Studios Home Entertainment and Sony Pictures Home Entertainment. Historically, the Company has not experienced difficulty in obtaining satisfactory sources of supply, and management believes that it will retain access to adequate sources of supply. However, a loss of a major supplier could cause a loss of sales, ~~of merchandise inventory. Revenue is recognized at the point-of-sale. Internet sales are recognized as revenue upon delivery to~~which would have an adverse effect on operating results and ~~acceptance by the customer. Loyalty card revenue is amortized over the life of the card. Sales are recorded net of estimated amounts~~also result in a decrease in vendor support for ~~sales returns and other allowances. Shipping and handling fee income from~~ the Company’s ~~Internet operations is recognized as net sales. The Company records shipping and handling costs in cost of goods sold.~~advertising programs.

Cash and Cash Equivalents: The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

~~Accounts Receivable:~~ Accounts receivable are comprised of receivables and unbilled revenues from advertising services performed for third parties, and amounts due under operating or service agreements with unaffiliated entities, loans to related business ventures, and other, individually insignificant amounts. There are no provisions for uncollectible amounts from retail sales of merchandise inventory since payment is received at the time of sale.

~~Cost of Sales:~~ In addition to the cost of product, the Company includes in cost of sales those costs associated with purchasing, receiving, shipping, inspecting and warehousing product. Also included are costs associated with the return of product to vendors. Cost of sales further includes the cost of inventory shrink and obsolescence and the benefit of vendor allowances and discounts.

~~Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses~~: Included in SG&A expenses are payroll and related costs, store operating costs, occupancy charges, professional and service fees, general operating and overhead expenses and depreciation charges (excluding those related to distribution operations, as discussed in Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Selling, general and administrative expenses also include asset impairment charges and write-offs, if any, and miscellaneous items, other than interest.

~~F-8~~

~~Vendor Allowances:~~ The Company often receives allowances from its vendors to fund in-store displays, print advertising and other promotional events. The Company accounts for vendor allowances in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB’s”) Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue No. 02-16, ~~Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor~~. Vendor advertising allowances which exceed specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred in relation to the advertising and promotions offered by the Company to its vendors are classified as a reduction in the purchase price of merchandise inventory.

~~Lease Accounting:~~ In 2004, the Company revised its method of accounting for rent expense (and related deferred rent liability) and leasehold improvements funded by landlord incentives for allowances under operating leases (tenant improvement allowances) to conform to GAAP, as clarified by the Chief Accountant of the SEC in a February 2005 letter to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. For all stores, the Company had calculated straight-line rent expense using the initial lease term, but was generally depreciating leasehold improvements over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the initial lease term plus the option periods. The Company corrected its calculation of straight-line rent expense to include the impact of escalating rents for periods in which it is reasonably assured of exercising lease options and to include in the lease term any period during which the Company is not obligated to pay rent while the store is being constructed (“rent holiday”). The Company also corrected its calculation of depreciation expense for leasehold improvements for those leases which do not include an option period. This resulted in rent expense being recorded at an earlier date for each lease and reduced future monthly rent expense, as the total rent due under the lease was recognized over a greater number of months. The Company accounts for step rent provisions, escalation clauses and other lease concessions by recognizing these amounts on a straight line basis over the initial lease term. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further detail.

~~Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations:~~ The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the asset. The Company also records a corresponding asset that is depreciated over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the ARO, the ARO is adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation. The Company adopted FIN 47, ~~Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143~~, effective January 28, 2006. In accordance with FIN 47, the Company recorded an asset and a corresponding liability for the present value of the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at its store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Concentration of Credit Risks: The Company maintains centralized cash management and investment programs whereby excess cash balances are invested in short-term money market funds and instruments considered to be cash equivalents. The Company’s investment portfolio is diversified and consists of short-term investment grade securities consistent with its investment guidelines. These guidelines include the provision that sufficient liquidity will be maintained to meet anticipated cash flow needs. The Company maintains investments with various financial institutions. These amounts often exceed the FDIC insurance limits. The Company limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution and believes that no significant concentration of credit risk exists with respect to cash investments.

~~Concentration~~Accounts Receivable: Accounts receivable are comprised of ~~Business Risks:~~ ~~The Company purchases~~receivables and unbilled revenues from advertising services performed for third parties, and amounts due under operating or service agreements with unaffiliated entities, loans to related business ventures, and other, individually insignificant amounts. There are no provisions for uncollectible amounts from retail sales of merchandise inventory ~~for its stores from approximately 900 suppliers, with approximately 71%~~since payment is received at the time of purchases being made from ten suppliers: EMD (EMI Music Distribution), Sony/BMG (Sony-Bertelsmann Music Group), WEA (Warner/Electra/Atlantic Corp.), UMVD (Universal Music and Video Distribution), Fox Video Inc., Paramount Home Video, Buena Vista Home Video, Sony Computer Entertainment and Sony Pictures Home Entertainment.Historically, the Company has not experienced difficulty in obtaining satisfactory sources of supply, and management believes that it will retain access to adequate sources of supply. However, a loss of a major supplier could cause a loss of sales, which would have an adverse effect on operating results and also result in a decrease in vendor support for the Company’s advertising programs.sale.

~~Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates:~~ Investments in unconsolidated affiliates have been recorded on the cost basis, with any decline in the market value below cost that is deemed other than temporary charged to operations. Write-off of investments in unconsolidated affiliates for other than temporary decline in market value are reflected in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. There were no write-off of investments in unconsolidated affiliates in 2005, 2004 and 2003.

Merchandise Inventory and Return Costs: ~~Inventory~~ Merchandise inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market as determined by the average cost method. Inventory valuation requires significant judgment and estimates, including obsolescence, shrink and any adjustments to market value, if market value is lower than cost. The Company records obsolescence and any adjustments to market value (if lower than cost) based on current and anticipated demand, customer preferences and market conditions. The provision for inventory shrink is estimated as a percentage of sales for the period from the last date a physical inventory was performed to the end of the fiscal year. Such estimates are based on historical results and trends, and the shrink results from the last physical inventory. Physical inventories are taken at least annually for all stores throughout the year, and inventory records are adjusted accordingly.

~~F-9~~

which varies depending on the type of merchandise being returned. Certain other vendors charge a handling fee based on units returned. The Company records merchandise return charges in cost of sales.

Fixed Assets and Depreciation: Fixed assets are recorded at cost and depreciated or amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives are as follows:


Leasehold improvements		Lesser of estimated useful life of the asset or the lease term
Fixtures and equipment		3-7 years (estimated useful life of the asset)
Buildings and improvements		3010-30 years

Major improvements and betterments to existing facilities and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. A majority of the Company’s operating leases are ten years in term. Amortization of capital lease assets is included in depreciation and amortization expense.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset over its remaining useful life. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair value is generally measured based on discounted estimated future cash flows. Assets to be disposed of would be separately presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less disposition costs. The assets and liabilities of a disposed group classified as held-for-sale would be presented separately in the appropriate assets and liabilities sections of the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

~~Impairment~~There were no impairment losses recorded in Fiscal 2006, 2005 2004 and 2003 were $0, $0 and $3.7 million, respectively. The 2003 amount, which is reflected in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statement of Operations, represents the write-down of the fixed assets of www.fye.com pursuant to the Company’s decision to outsource the operation of its Web site.or 2004. Losses for store closings in the ordinary course of business represent the write down of the net book value of abandoned fixtures and leasehold improvements. The loss on disposal of fixed assets related to store closings was $2.2 million, $2.4 million and $2.8 million in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and ~~$2.5 million in 2005,~~ 2004, ~~and 2003,~~ respectively, and is included in SG&A ~~expenses. Losses due to~~expenses in the ~~write down~~Consolidated Statement of ~~fixed assets related to store closings are included in~~Operations and loss on disposal of fixed assets in the Consolidated ~~Statements~~Statement of Cash Flows. Store closings usually occur at the expiration of the lease, at which time leasehold improvements, which constitute a majority of the abandoned assets, are fully depreciated. Also, actual store closures usually occur within three to six months of the planned store closure date. As

Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations: The Company records the fair value of an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development, and/or normal use of the asset. The Company also records a corresponding asset that is depreciated over the life of the

asset. Subsequent to the initial measurement of the ARO, the ARO is adjusted at the end of each period to reflect the passage of time and changes in ~~depreciation estimates~~the estimated future cash flows underlying the obligation.

Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates: Investments in unconsolidated affiliates have been recorded on the cost basis, with any decline in the market value below cost that is deemed other than temporary charged to operations. Write-offs of investments in unconsolidated affiliates for other than temporary decline in market value are reflected in SG&A expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. There were no write-offs of investments in unconsolidated affiliates in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004.

Revenue Recognition: The Company’s revenue is primarily from retail sales of merchandise inventory. Revenue is recognized at the point-of-sale. Internet sales are recognized as ~~required~~revenue upon delivery to and acceptance by ~~Accounting Principles Board, Opinion No. 20,~~ ~~Accounting Changes~~ ~~(“APB 20”), do not have a material impact on financial results.~~

~~Advertising Costs:~~ the customer. Loyalty card revenue is amortized over the life of the card. Sales are recorded net of estimated amounts for sales returns and other allowances. Shipping and handling fee income from the Company’s Internet operations is recognized as net sales. The Company ~~applies~~records shipping and handling costs in cost of goods sold. Sales are recorded net of applicable sales taxes.

Cost of Sales: In addition to the ~~guidance issued by~~cost of product, the ~~FASB’s~~Company includes in cost of sales those costs associated with purchasing, receiving, shipping, inspecting and warehousing product. Also included are costs associated with the return of product to vendors. Cost of sales further includes the cost of inventory shrink and obsolescence and the benefit of vendor allowances and discounts.

Selling, General and Administrative (“SG&A”) Expenses: Included in SG&A expenses are payroll and related costs, store operating costs, occupancy charges, professional and service fees, general operating and overhead expenses and depreciation charges (excluding those related to distribution operations, as discussed in Note 4 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K). Selling, general and administrative expenses also include asset impairment charges and write-offs, if any, and miscellaneous items, other than interest.

Advertising Costs and Vendor Allowances: The Company often receives allowances from its vendors to fund in-store displays, print advertising and other promotional events. The Company accounts for vendor allowances in accordance with the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB’s”) Emerging Issues Task Force ~~EITF~~(“EITF”) Statement No. 02-16,Accounting by a Customer~~(Including~~ (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration Received from a Vendor. Vendor advertising allowances which exceed specific, incremental and identifiable costs incurred in relation to the advertising and promotions offered by the Company to its vendors are classified as a reduction in the purchase price of merchandise inventory. Accordingly, advertising and sales promotion costs are charged to operations, offset by direct vendor reimbursements, as incurred. Total advertising expense, excluding vendor allowances, ~~were~~was $29.7 million, $22.0 million, and $23.9 million in Fiscal 2006, 2005, and ~~$21.2 million in 2005,~~ 2004, ~~and 2003~~ respectively. In the aggregate, vendor allowances supporting the Company’s advertising and promotion included as a reduction of SG&A expenses, as reimbursements of such costs in accordance with EITF No. 02-16, were $10.7 million, $9.6 million, and $11.8 million in Fiscal 2006, 2005, and ~~$12.7 million in 2005,~~ 2004, ~~and 2003,~~ respectively.

Lease Accounting: The Company accounts for rent expense and leasehold improvements funded by landlord incentives for allowances under operating leases (tenant improvement allowances) in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”), as clarified by the Chief Accountant of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in a February 2005 letter to the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. The Company’s calculation of straight-line rent expense includes the impact of escalating rents for periods in which it is reasonably assured of exercising lease options and includes in the lease term any period during which the Company is not obligated to pay rent while the store is being constructed (“rent holiday”). The Company accounts for step rent provisions, escalation clauses and other lease concessions by recognizing these amounts on a straight line basis over the initial lease term. The Company capitalizes leasehold improvements funded by tenant improvement allowances, depreciating them over the lives of the related leases. The tenant improvement allowances are recorded as deferred rent in the Consolidated Balance Sheet and are amortized as a reduction in rent expense over the life of the related leases.

Store Closing ~~Costs~~Costs:: Management periodically evaluates the closing of underperforming stores. Reserves are established at the time a liability is incurred for the present value of any remaining lease obligations, net of estimated sublease income, and other exit costs, as prescribed by SFAS No. 146,Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.

Gift Cards: The Company offers gift cards for sale. A deferred income account, which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, is established for gift cards issued. The deferred income balance related to gift cards was approximately $21.0 million and $17.8 million at the end of Fiscal 2006 and 2005, respectively When gift cards are redeemed at the store level, revenue is recorded and the related liability is reduced. Breakage is estimated based on the historical relationship of the redemption of gift cards redeemed to gift cards sold, over a certain period of time. The Company has the ability to reasonably and reliably estimate gift card liability based on historical experience with redemption rates associated with a large volume of homogeneous transactions, from a period of more than ten years. The Company’s estimate is not susceptible to significant external factors and the circumstances around purchases and redemptions have not changed significantly over time. The Company recorded breakage on its gift cards for Fiscal 2006, 2005 ~~2004~~ and ~~2003~~2004 in the amount of $3.6 million, $2.9 million ~~$4.7 million~~ and ~~$3.5~~$4.7 million, respectively.

respective tax bases, and tax operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred tax assets are subject to valuation allowances based upon management’s estimates of realizability.

~~F-10~~

Comprehensive Income (Loss): The Company accounts for comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) ~~No.130,~~ No. 130,Reporting Comprehensive Income and results are presented within the Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss). Comprehensive ~~loss~~income for ~~2005~~Fiscal 2006 consisted of net income and adjustments to the ~~excess additional minimum~~ pension liability ~~over unrecognized prior service cost.~~recorded under SFAS No. 158. Comprehensive loss for Fiscal 2005 and income for Fiscal 2004 consisted of net income and adjustments to the ~~excess additional minimum~~ pension liability ~~over unrecognized prior service cost. In 2003,~~recorded under SFAS No. 87.

Stock-Based Compensation: Effective January 29, 2006, the Company ~~did not have other items of comprehensive income as defined by~~adopted SFAS ~~No.130,~~No. 123 (Revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123 (R)”), which amends SFAS No. 123 and ~~accordingly, comprehensive income was equal to net income.~~

~~Stock-Based Compensation:~~ ~~The Company applies the intrinsic value-based method of accounting prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No.25,~~ ~~Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees~~,~~and related interpretations including FASB Interpretation No.44,~~ ~~Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation – An Interpretation of~~supersedes APB No. 25, in establishing standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, as well as transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. This Statement requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value of the share-based payment. This Statement establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for its fixed plan stock options. Under this method, compensation expense is recorded on the date of grant only if the current market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price. Unearned compensation recognizedshare-based payment transactions with employees, except for ~~restricted stock awards is shown as a separate component of shareholders’~~ equity ~~and is amortized to expense over the vesting period of the stock award using the straight-line method. SFAS No.123,~~ ~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation~~~~, as amended~~instruments held by ~~SFAS No.148,~~ ~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure,~~ ~~established accounting and disclosure requirements using a fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based~~ employee ~~compensation~~share ownership plans. As allowed byunder SFAS ~~No.123,~~No. 123 (R), the Company ~~has~~ elected ~~to continue to apply~~ the ~~intrinsic value-based~~modified prospective method of ~~accounting described above, and adopted~~adoption, under which compensation cost is recognized in the ~~disclosure requirements of SFAS No.123 and SFAS No.148. The Company will adopt the expense recognition provisions of SFAS No.123(R),~~financial statements beginning with the ~~first quarter~~effective date of ~~its 2006 fiscal year~~SFAS No. 123 (R) for all share-based payments granted after that ~~began on January 29, 2006.~~date, and for all unvested awards granted prior to the effective date of SFAS No. 123 (R). Accordingly, prior period amounts have not been restated.

In the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the acceleration of vesting of previously granted unvested options awarded annually to employees and officers under the Company’s Stock Option Plans which had exercise prices greater than $10.00 per share.

Options to purchase 2,273,057 shares of the Company’s common stock, representing approximately 24% of the total options outstanding, became immediately vested and exercisable as a result of this action. The number of shares and exercise prices of the options subject to the acceleration remained unchanged. Also, all of the other terms of the options remain the same. Based upon an analysis performed in ~~a ccordance~~accordance with SFAS No.123, the acceleration of vesting of these stock options resulted in compensation expense of $5.9 million, in the pro forma net income (loss) results. The decision to accelerate vesting of these stock options was made primarily to avoid recognizing compensation expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations in future financial statements upon the adoption of SFAS ~~No.123(R)~~No.123 (R),Share-Based Payment,which the Company ~~will adopt~~adopted on January 29, 2006. The acceleration of the vesting of these stock options ~~will reduce~~reduced the amounts recognized by the Company as share-based compensation expense, net of income taxes, by approximately $2.4 million in Fiscal 2006 and will reduce compensation expense by approximately $1.9 million in Fiscal 2007, $1.2 million in Fiscal 2008, and $0.4 million in Fiscal 2009. The accelerated options included 1,355,000 options held by executive officers and 918,057 options held by other employees. Based on the Company’s closing stock price of $6.25 per share on the date of accelerated vesting, , the exercise prices of all of the options were above the closing market price.

Total stock-based compensation expense recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2006 was $2.2 million, before income taxes. The related total deferred tax benefit was approximately $0.9 million. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company presented all tax benefits for deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flows in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. SFAS No. 123(R) requires the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options to be classified and reported as both an operating cash outflow and a financing cash inflow on a prospective basis upon adoption. As of February 3, 2007, there was $3.3 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to stock option awards that is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of 1.4 years.

The following table illustrates the effect on net (loss) income and (loss) ~~and~~ earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS ~~No.123~~No. 123 to ~~stock-based employee compensation~~its share-based payments for Fiscal 2005 ~~2004~~ and ~~2003.~~2004.

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

2003

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

Net income, as reported

$
609

$
41,841

$
23,067

Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects

180

159

93

Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects

(7,521
)
(2,919
)
(3,347
)
Pro forma net income (loss)

$
(6,732
)
$
39,081

$
19,813

Earnings (loss) per share:

Basic - as reported

$
0.02

$
1.21

$
0.62

Basic– pro forma

$
(0.21
)
$
1.13

$
0.53

Diluted – as reported

$
0.02

$
1.15

$
0.60

Diluted – pro forma

$
(0.21
)
$
1.08

$
0.52



($ in thousands except for per share amounts)	Fiscal Year

	2005			2004


Net income, as reported	$	609		$	41,841
Add: Stock-based employee compensation expense included in reported net income, net of related tax effects		180			159
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects		(7,521	)		(2,919	)

Pro forma net (loss) income	$	(6,732	)	$	39,081

Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic - as reported	$	0.02		$	1.21
Basic– pro forma	$	(0.21	)	$	1.13
Diluted – as reported	$	0.02		$	1.15
Diluted – pro forma	$	(0.21	)	$	1.08

The fair values of the options granted have been estimated at the date of grant using the Black - Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:


	Stock Option Plan

	2006		2005		2004

Dividend yield		0%		0%		0%
Expected volatility		65.9% - 71.2%		55%		57%
Risk-free interest rate		4.64% - 5.04%		3.71% - 4.34%		3.71%
Expected option life in years		4.93 – 7.12		5 – 6.25		5
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted during the year		$3.42		$6.59		$3.49

~~F-11~~

Stock Option Plan

2005

2004

2003

Dividend yield

0%

0%

0%

Expected volatility

55%

57%

59%

Risk-free interest rate

3.71% - 4.34%

3.71%

3.16%

Expected option life in years

5 – 6.25

5

5

Weighted average fair value per share of options granted during the year

$6.59

$3.49

$1.16

Earnings ~~(Loss)~~ Per Share: Basic earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share is calculated by dividing net income ~~(loss)~~ by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the sum of the weighted average shares outstanding and additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued for the Company’s common stock ~~options~~awards from the Company’s Stock ~~Option~~Award Plans. ~~See Note 9 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

The following is a reconciliation of the basic weighted average number of shares outstanding to the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding:

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

2003

(in thousands)

Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic

31,962

34,531

37,422

Dilutive effect of employee stock options

170

1,766

787

Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted

32,132

36,297

38,209

Antidilutive stock options

4,756

1,631

5,322


	Fiscal Year

	2006		2005		2004


Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic		30,797		31,962		34,531
Dilutive effect of employee stock awards		1,189		170		1,766

Weighted average common shares outstanding – diluted		31,986		32,132		36,297


Antidilutive stock awards		7,290		4,756		1,631

Antidilutive stock ~~options~~awards outstanding were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average market price of the common shares during the period.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:The carrying amounts reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other current liabilities approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying value of life insurance policies included in other assets approximates fair value based on estimates received from insurance companies. The carrying value of the Company’s long-term debt including current portion, approximates fair value based on estimated discounted future cash flows for remaining maturities and rates currently offered to the Company for similar debt instruments. The Company had outstanding product import letters of credit with a fair value of ~~$0.3 million~~$36 thousand and ~~$3.5~~$0.3 million as of February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006 ~~and January 29, 2005~~ respectively.

Segment Information:The Company has one reportable segment ~~and,~~ in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 131,Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information~~, the~~. The following table shows revenues by merchandise category:

Fiscal year

2005

2004

2003

($ in thousands)

Music:

Compact discs

$
655,806

$
736,149

$
717,145

Audio cassettes and singles

7,906

14,463

23,819

Total Music

663,712

750,612

740,964

Video:

DVD

352,184

360,262

313,977

VHS

19,781

37,781

60,891

Total Video

371,965

398,043

374,868

Video games

90,408

89,297

80,888

Other

112,401

127,181

133,906

Total

$
1,238,486

$
1,365,133

$
1,330,626



	Fiscal year

	2006		2005		2004

	($ in thousands)
Music	$	650,352	$	663,712	$	750,612
Home Video		552,722		371,965		398,043
Video games		114,514		90,408		89,297
Other		153,569		112,401		127,181

Total	$	1,471,157	$	1,238,486	$	1,365,133

The “Other” category includes electronics, accessories ~~boutique,~~ and ~~other sales,~~trend items, none of which individually exceeds 5%. of total sales.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:

~~F-12~~

. SFAS No. ~~155 amends~~159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. The objective of the statement is to provide entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. SFAS No. ~~133,~~ ~~Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities~~~~, to permit fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument with an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, provided that the whole instrument~~159 is ~~accounted for on a fair value basis. SFAS No. 155 amends SFAS No. 140,~~ ~~Accounting for Transfers and Servicing~~effective as of ~~Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities~~, to allow a qualifying special-purpose entity to hold a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial instrument. SFAS No. 155 applies to all financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entity’s ~~first~~ fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS No. 159 is not expected to significantly impact the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157,Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that ~~begins~~require or permit fair value measurements, however, does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after ~~September~~November 15, ~~2006, with earlier application allowed.~~2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of SFAS ~~No.155~~No. 157 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s ~~consolidated financial position or results of operations.~~Consolidated Financial Statements.

In ~~May 2005,~~July 2006, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~Interpretation No. ~~154,~~ (“FIN”) 48,Accounting ~~Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement~~for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—An Interpretation of ~~APB Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes and~~ FASB Statement No. ~~3, Reporting Accounting Changes~~109, which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in ~~Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 provides guidance~~a tax return. In particular, this interpretation requires uncertain tax positions to be recognized only if they are “more-likely-than-not” to be upheld based on their technical merits. Additionally, the measurement of the tax position will be based on the ~~accounting for and reporting~~largest amount that is determined to have greater than a 50% likelihood of ~~accounting changes and error corrections. It establishes, unless impracticable, retrospective application as the required method for reporting a change in accounting principle in the absence~~realization upon ultimate settlement. Any resulting cumulative effect of explicit transition requirements specific to the newly adopted accounting principle. SFAS No. 154 also provides guidance for determining whether retrospective application of a change in accounting principle is impracticable and for reporting a change when retrospective application is impracticable. The provisions of SFAS No. 154 are effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption ofapplying the provisions of ~~SFAS No. 154~~FIN 48 upon adoption would be reported as an adjustment to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. FIN 48 will be effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning February 4, 2007. The Company is ~~not expected to have a material~~currently evaluating the impact of this interpretation on the Company’s ~~consolidated financial condition or results of operations.~~Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~In June 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) issued EITF No. 05-6,~~ ~~Determining the Amortization Period of Leasehold Improvements (purchased after lease inception) or Acquired in a Business Combination (“EITF 05-6”)~~. EITF 05-6 provides that the amortization period for leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination or purchased after the inception of a lease be the shorter of (a) the useful life of the assets or (b) a term that includes required lease periods and renewals that are reasonably assured upon the acquisition of the purchase. The provisions of EITF 05-6 are effective on a prospective basis for leasehold improvements purchased or acquired beginning July 1, 2005. The adoption of EITF 05-6 did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

~~In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123(R),~~ ~~Share-Based Payment: an amendment of FASB Statements No. 123 and 95~~. SFAS No.123(R) requires an enterprise to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the fair value of the award at the grant date (with limited exceptions) and recognize the compensation cost over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. In March 2005, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107 (“SAB 107”), which expresses views of the SEC staff regarding the application of SFAS No. 123(R). Among other things, SAB 107 provides interpretive guidance related to the interaction between SFAS No. 123(R) and certain SEC rules and regulations, and provides the SEC staff’s views regarding the valuation of share-based payment arrangements for public companies. In February 2006, the FASB published FASB Staff Position No. FAS 123(R)-4 (“FSP No.123(R)-4”), ~~Classification of Options and Similar Instruments Issued as Employee Compensation That Allow for Cash Settlement upon the Occurrence of a Contingent Event~~~~, to amend guidance in SFAS No. 123(R),~~ ~~Share-Based Payment~~, on classifying options and similar instruments issued as part of employee compensation arrangements. As amended, SFAS No. 123(R) requires options issued as compensation to employees to be classified as liabilities if the cash settlement feature can be exercised only upon the occurrence of a contingent event that is outside the employee’s control, and such event is deemed probable to occur. The Company will adopt the expense recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123(R), beginning with the first quarter of its 2006 fiscal year. If the Company had applied the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R) to the financial statements for the period ending January 28, 2006, net loss would have been greater by approximately $7.3 million or $(0.23) per share.

Note 2. Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle

The Company adopted FIN 47,Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligations—an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143, effective January 28, 2006. In accordance with FIN 47, the Company recorded an asset and a corresponding liability for the present value of the estimated asset retirement obligations associated with the fixed assets and leasehold improvements at its store locations that arise under the terms of operating leases.

The following table illustrates the effect on income before extraordinary gain, net income and related per share amounts as if the Company had applied the provisions of FIN 47 retroactively:

Fiscal Year

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

2005

2004

2003

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, as reported

$
2,886

$
38,675

$
18,728

Pro forma income before extraordinary gain - unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

$
2,922

$
38,946

$
18,533

~~F-13~~


	Fiscal Year

($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)	2005		2004


Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, as reported	$	2,886	$	38,675
Pro forma income before extraordinary gain - unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	2,922	$	38,946


Net income as reported	$	609	$	41,841

Proforma net income	$	2,922	$	42,112


Proforma liability	$	4,327	$	4,408

Basic earnings per share:
Earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, as reported	$	0.09	$	1.12
Pro forma earnings per share before extraordinary gain- unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.09	$	1.13


Basic earnings per share as reported	$	0.02	$	1.21


Pro forma basic earnings per share	$	0.09	$	1.22

Diluted earnings per share:

Earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, as reported	$	0.09	$	1.06

Pro forma earnings per share before extraordinary gain- unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.09	$	1.07


Diluted earnings per share as reported	$	0.02	$	1.15


Pro forma diluted earnings per share	$	0.09	$	1.16

Net income as reported

$
609

$
41,841

$
23,067

Pro forma net income

$
2,922

$
42,112

$
22,872

Pro forma liability

$
4,327

$
4,408

$
4,716

Basic earnings per share:

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, per share as reported

$
0.09

$
1.12

$
0.50

Pro forma income per share before extraordinary gain- unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
1.13

$
0.50

Net income per share as reported

$
0.02

$
1.21

$
0.62

Pro forma net income per share

$
0.09

$
1.22

$
0.61

Diluted earnings per share:

Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, per share as reported

$
0.09

$
1.06

$
0.49

Pro forma income per share before extraordinary gain- unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
1.07

$
0.49

Net income per share as reported

$
0.02

$
1.15

$
0.60

Pro forma net income per share

$
0.09

$
1.16

$
0.60

Note 3. Business Combinations

During 2005, the Company acquired an 80% interest in a newly formed company that is fully consolidated for financial reporting purposes. The Company has committed funding of $3.0 million over a period of three years, of which $1.0 million had been funded as of January 28, 2006.

On July 22, 2004, the Company acquired the remaining 29% of the issued and outstanding shares of Second Spin Inc., for cash of $2.0 million. The Company now owns 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Second Spin Inc. In accordance with SFAS No. 141, ~~Business Combinations~~, the transaction was accounted for as a step acquisition with the excess of purchase price over the fair value reported as goodwill. The Company recorded goodwill of $62,000 related to this transaction. Prior to the step acquisition, the Company had consolidated all of the net assets and operations of Second Spin Inc. in its Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Operations due to Second Spin’s accumulated operating losses, and accordingly no minority interest had been reflected in the consolidated financial statements.

~~In October 2003,~~March 27, 2006, the Company acquired substantially all the net assets of ~~Wherehouse Entertainment Inc.~~Musicland Holding Corp. (“~~Wherehouse”~~Musicland”). The acquisition of Musicland’s assets provided the Company with the ability to leverage its overhead expenses over a greater store base, and ~~CD World Inc.~~strategically increase the Company’s national presence and provide further growth opportunities. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement (“~~CD World”~~APA”), the Company acquired 335 of Musicland’s 400 stores, with the remainder of the stores being liquidated under an agency agreement with Hilco Merchant Resources LLC. Musicland, which operated retail stores and websites under the names Sam Goody (samgoody.com), Suncoast Motion Picture Company (suncoast.com), On Cue and MediaPlay.com, filed a voluntary petition to restructure under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in January 2006. The acquisition was accounted for ~~$35.2~~using the purchase method of accounting. The Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2006 includes the results of Musicland beginning March 27, 2006.

The purchase price for the acquired Musicland assets was $78.8 million, ~~and $1.9 million, respectively.~~including acquisition-related costs of $1.8 million. The total purchase price was allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on ~~a preliminary basis during 2003 using information available at~~their estimated fair values as of February 3, 2007 as follows:


	*($ in thousands)*

Assets Acquired:
Inventory	$	112,612

Liabilities Assumed:
Accrued expenses and other	$	11,062
Other long-term liabilities		5,280

Total liabilities assumed	$	16,342

Net assets acquired	$	96,270

From March 27, 2006 to February 3, 2007, the ~~time. Extraordinary~~Company allocated the purchase price in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 141,Business Combinations, resulting in an extraordinary gain ~~recorded in 2003 was $4.3~~– unallocated negative goodwill of $10.7 million, ~~which is~~ net of income taxes ~~of $2.4 million, related to unallocated negative goodwill.~~$6.7 million. The extraordinary gain represents the excess of the fair value of net assets acquired ~~in excess of~~over the purchase price. The purchase price was allocated on a preliminary basis during the thirteen weeks ended April 29, 2006 using information available at the time. The extraordinary gain recorded as of ~~the assets.~~April 29, 2006 was $0.9 million, which was net of income taxes of $0.7 million. In accordance with SFAS No.141, the allocation of the purchase price to the assets and liabilities acquired ~~was~~must be finalized within twelve months following the date of acquisition. Accordingly, the purchase price allocation has been adjusted between April 29, 2006 and ~~adjusted during 2004,~~February 3, 2007, resulting in an adjustment to the extraordinary gain of ~~$3.2~~$9.8 million, which is net of income taxes of ~~$2.0 million, related to unallocated negative goodwill.~~$6.0 million. The pre-tax increase in the extraordinary gain ~~in 2004~~from April 29, 2006 to February 3, 2007 represents adjustments to the value of ~~liquidated~~acquired inventory ($~~2.5~~1.9 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to the former Musicland loyalty program ($3.4 million), an adjustment to customer liabilities related to gift cards based on the redemption experience since acquisition ($~~2.1~~6.1 million) and an adjustment to occupancy related expenses ($~~0.6~~1.5 million) and an adjustment to the cash purchase price ($2.9 million).

The financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of operations of the Company and Musicland, on a pro forma basis as though the companies had been combined at the beginning of each period presented. This pro forma information is presented for informational purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have been achieved had the acquisition taken place at the beginning of each period presented. The pro forma information does not include one time items related to purchase accounting, including the extraordinary gain arising from unallocated negative goodwill.

The pro forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2006 combines the historical results of the Company for Fiscal 2006 and the historical results of Musicland for the period preceding the acquisition from January 29, 2006 through March 27, 2006.The pro forma Consolidated Statement of Operations for Fiscal 2005 combines the historical results of the Company and Musicland for the periods. The following is the pro forma information, exclusive of the effect of purchase accounting adjustments:


($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)	2006			2005


Pro forma sales	$	1,519,620		$	1,625,981
Pro forma loss before extraordinary gain- unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(1,573	)		(1,837	)


Pro forma net loss	$	(1,573	)	$	(4,114	)

Pro forma net loss before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, per basic share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.06	)

Pro forma net loss before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, per diluted share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.06	)


Pro forma net loss per basic share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.13	)


Pro forma net loss per diluted share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.13	)

In March 2006, the Company acquired an 80% interest in Mix & Burn LLC, a company that is fully consolidated for financial reporting. The Company has committed funding of $5.2 million, of which $4.0 million has been funded as of February 3, 2007. Pro forma results of operations including the results of Mix & Burn LLC have not been presented because the pro forma effect of the acquisition would not be material to the Company’s results of operations. Mix & Burn LLC is a provider of digital content services to retailers nationwide. Using its technology, consumers can create custom music CDs from an extensive catalog of new and old content. This acquisition will enable the Company’s retail locations to offer customers new content, new products and new services relating to music players and music player enabled cell phones in its stores.

Note 4. Fixed Assets

Fixed assets consist of the following:

~~F-14~~

January 28,

January 29,

2006

2005

($ in thousands)

Buildings

$
26,275

$
26,275

Fixtures and equipment

196,296

198,396

Leasehold improvements

159,707

139,283

382,278

363,954

Allowances for depreciation and amortization

(249,814
)
(233,758
)

$
132,464

$
130,196


	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006

	($ in thousands)
Buildings	$	26,493		$	26,275
Fixtures and equipment		229,115			196,296
Leasehold improvements		157,935			159,041

		413,543			381,612
Allowances for depreciation and amortization		(275,291	)		(249,814	)

	$	138,252		$	131,798

Depreciation and amortization expense related to the Company’s distribution center facility and equipment of $3.1 million, $3.1 million and $2.5 million in 2006, 2005 and ~~$2.4 million in 2005,~~ 2004, ~~and 2003,~~ respectively, is included in cost of sales. All other depreciation and amortization of fixed assets is included in SG&A expenses.

Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets is included in the ~~consolidated statements of operations as follows:~~

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

2003

($ in thousands)

Cost of sales

$
3,076

$
2,466

$
2,405

Selling, general and administrative expenses

33,993

37,330

38,134

Total

$
37,069

$
39,796

$
40,539

On February 7, 2005, the Office of the Chief Accountant of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission issued a clarification of their interpretation of certain accounting issues and their application under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles relating to operating leases. After an internal review and discussion with its independent auditors, the Company determined its then current method of accounting for allowances provided by landlords to fund leasehold improvements needed to be revised. Historically, the Company had accounted for these allowances as reductions to the related leasehold improvements on its Consolidated Balance Sheets and as a reduction of related investing activities on its Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. In 2004, Management revised its method of accounting for these allowances to record them as deferred rent on its Consolidated Balance Sheets which were amortized as a reduction in rent expense over the life of the related leases. This resulted in rent expense being recorded at an earlier date for each lease and reduced future monthly rent expense, as the total rent due under the lease was recognized over a greater number of months.

The net, unamortized allowances recorded in the January 29, 2005 Consolidated Balance Sheets was $12.4 million, of which $10.0 million was reflected under deferred rent and other long-term liabilities and the remaining amounts were included in accrued expenses and other. The cumulative adjustment to the Consolidated Statements of Operations ~~for 2004~~ as result of the revision was to decrease net income by approximately $0.2 million. The revision did not, however, affect the classification of the amortization of these allowances in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.follows:


	Fiscal Year

	2006		2005		2004

	($ in thousands)
Cost of sales	$	3,108	$	3,076	$	2,466
Selling, general and administrative expenses		36,991		34,140		37,330

Total	$	40,099	$	37,216	$	39,796

In 2004, during the Company’s review of its accounting for allowances, described above, it came to light there were certain leasehold improvements recorded with useful lives exceeding the related remaining lease terms of the respective stores. The Company’s policy with respect to leasehold improvements is to compute depreciation expense based on the shorter of the useful life of the asset or its related store lease term. The cumulative adjustment to the Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2004 as result of the revision was to decrease net income by $0.5 million.

No adjustment was made to prior periods for the revision to the accounting for allowances or the adjustment to depreciation on leasehold improvements, as management considered these items to be immaterial to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. These items, individually, or together, did not change previously reported earnings per share in prior years by more than $0.02, did not change previously reported total assets or liabilities by more than 4.0% and did not change reported net cash provided by (used in) operating activities or net cash used by investing activities by more than $1.7 million.

Note 5. Debt

On January 5, 2006, the Company entered into a new five year, $100 million revolving secured credit facility agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with Bank of America, N.A. At the election of the Company, loans under the Credit Agreement bear interest on the principal amount at a rate equal to either, the Prime Rate or Adjusted LIBOR plus 0.75%. The principal amount of ~~the~~ all outstanding loans under the Credit Agreement together with any accrued but unpaid interest, are due and payable on January 6, 2010, unless otherwise paid earlier pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement. Payments of amounts due under the Credit Agreement are secured by the Company’s eligible merchandise inventory, proceeds from sale of merchandise inventory and the stock of the Company’s subsidiaries.

The new Credit Agreement replaces the Company’s previous ~~Credit Agreement~~credit agreement and will provide for general corporate purposes. The Credit Agreement includes customary provisions, including affirmative and negative covenants, including representations, warranties and restrictions on additional indebtedness and acquisitions. The Credit Agreement also includes customary events of default, including, among other things, bankruptcy, and certain changes of control.

~~F-15~~

~~Prior to the new credit agreement the Company had a three year, $100 million secured revolving credit facility with Congress Financial Corporation that would have expired in July 2006.~~

~~Subsequent to January 28,~~On March 23, 2006, the Company entered into a First Amendment of the Credit Agreement with Bank of America, ~~N.A on March 26, 2006,~~N.A. which ~~increases~~increased the maximum amount available for borrowing under the revolving secured credit facility to $130 ~~million.~~million, under the same terms and conditions.

On October 20, 2006, the Company entered into a Second Amendment of the Credit Agreement with Bank of America, N.A. which increased the maximum amount available for borrowing under the revolving secured credit facility to $150 million, under the same terms and conditions.

During Fiscal 2006, 2005 ~~2004~~ and ~~2003,~~2004, the highest aggregate balances outstanding under the revolving credit facility were $107.5 million, $27.2 million ~~$28.0 million~~ and ~~$58.3~~$28.0 million, respectively. As of February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, ~~and January 29, 2005,~~ the Company had ~~$0.5 million~~$36 thousand and ~~$0.3~~$0.5 million, respectively, in outstanding letter of credit obligations under the ~~credit agreements~~Credit Agreements with Bank of America, ~~N.A and Congress Financial Corporation, respectively.~~N.A. The Company had ~~$99.5~~$150 million and ~~$99.7~~$99.5 million, respectively, available for borrowing as of February 3, 2007 and January 28, ~~2006 and January 29, 2005.~~

2006.

During 2004, the Company borrowed $5.8 million under a mortgage loan to finance the purchase of real estate. The mortgage loan is repayable in monthly installments of $64,000 over 10 years with a fixed interest rate of 6.0% and is collateralized by the real estate. ~~The mortgage loan contains a minimum net worth (shareholders’ equity) covenant of $290 million, excluding the impact, if any, of certain non-cash charges.~~ As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, the outstanding balance on the loan was ~~$5.1~~$4.6 million. The following table presents principal cash payments of long-term debt by expected maturity dates as of ~~January 28, 2006:~~February 3, 2007:


	Long-term debt

	($ in thousands)
2007		506
2008		537
2009		570
2010		606
2011		646
Thereafter		1,726

Total		4,591
Less: current portion		506

Long –term debt obligation	$	4,085

Long-term debt

($ in thousands)

2006

477

2007

506

2008

537

2009

570

2010

606

Thereafter

2,368

Total

5,064

Less: current portion

477

Long –term debt obligation

$
4,587

Note 6. Income Taxes

Income tax (benefit) expense consists of the following:

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

2003

($ in thousands)

Federal – current

$
(3,887
)
$
(3,969
)
$
10,044

State – current

791

1,913

2,364

Deferred

4,186

6,948

(4,106
)

$
1,090

$
4,892

$
8,302


				Fiscal Year

	2006			2005			2004

	($ in thousands)
Federal – current	$	2,090		$	(3,887	)	$	(3,969	)
State – current		256			791			1,913
Deferred		(4,387	)		4,186			6,948

	$	(2,041	)	$	1,090		$	4,892

A reconciliation of the Company’s effective income tax rate with the Federal statutory rate is as follows:

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

2003

Federal statutory rate

35.0
%
35.0
%
35.0
%
State income taxes, net of federal tax effect

52.2
%
2.1
%
3.5
%
Change in federal valuation allowance

(5.9
)%
(2.1
)%
(0.4
)%
Closing of federal tax examination

—

(24.2
)%
—

Corporate-owned life insurance payment settlement, net

5.9
%
0.5
%
(7.4
)%
Cash surrender value – insurance/ benefit programs

(4.2
)%
(0.2
)%
(0.8
)%
Executive compensation

3.3
%
0.4
%
0.4
%
Tax exempt income

(3.2
)%
(0.3
)%
(0.2
)%
Closing of tax periods

(8.8
)%
—

—

Tax credits

(7.8
)%
(0.2
)%
(0.3
)%
Recognized deferred tax asset

(43.3
)%
—

—

Other

4.2
%
0.2
%
0.9
%
Effective income tax rate

27.4
%
11.2
%
30.7
%

~~F-16~~


	Fiscal Year

	2006			2005			2004

Federal statutory rate		35.0	%		35.0	%		35.0	%
State income taxes, net of federal tax effect		17.9	%		52.2	%		2.1	%
Change in federal valuation allowance		99.3	%		(5.9	)%		(2.1	%)
Closing of federal tax examination		—			—			(24.2	%)
Corporate-owned life insurance payment settlement, net		(21.4	)%		5.9	%		0.5	%
Cash surrender value – insurance/ benefit programs		10.7	%		(4.2	)%		(0.2	)%
Executive compensation		(13.1	)%		3.3	%		0.4	%
Tax exempt income		17.7	%		(3.2	)%		(0.3	)%
Closing of tax periods		18.1	%		(8.8	)%		—
Tax credits		27.6	%		(7.8	)%		(0.2	)%
Recognized deferred tax asset		—			(43.3	%)		—
Other		(5.1	)%		4.2	%		0.2	%

Effective income tax rate		186.7	%		27.4	%		11.2	%

During 2004, the Company closed a federal tax examination for periods through the Company’s 2000 fiscal year. The settlement closed all outstanding matters related to corporate-owned life insurance policies which were part of the Company’s acquisition of CM Holdings Inc. (“Camelot”) in 1999. As a result of the closing agreement with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), the Company recorded a tax benefit of $10.5 million, which reversed federal income tax payable amounts originally recorded in the years covered by the examination. The closing of the federal tax examination further resulted in the recording of a state deferred tax benefit, net of federal tax effect of $0.9 million in 2004, attributable to state net operating loss carryforwards from Camelot. The amounts and utilization of these state net operating loss carryforwards had been uncertain until the closing of the federal tax examination in 2004. During 2005, the Company recognized a tax benefit of $2.0 million attributable to the effect of additional deductible temporary differences.

The Other category is comprised of various items, including non deductible meals, dues, penalties, amortization and graduated rate brackets.

During 2000, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware issued an opinion upholding the IRS’ disallowance of deductions of interest expense related to corporate-owned life insurance policies through fiscal 1994. The original accrual for additional income taxes resulting from disallowed interest expense deductions was recorded following the 2000 court decision. During 2003, the Company and the IRS agreed on final computational and payment terms for an amount less than previously accrued, which resulted in an income tax benefit of $2.1 million in 2003. Under the final payment terms, the Company has agreed with the IRS to make annual interest payments and a final principal payment of approximately $7.1 million in 2007. The remaining accrued ~~liabilities~~liability attributable to this matter as of ~~January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005 are $8.7~~February 3, 2007, including accrued interest, is $7.2 million which ~~are~~is included in ~~deferred rent and other long-term liabilities~~income tax payable in the Consolidated Balance ~~Sheets.~~Sheet.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets are as follows:

January 28,

January 29,

2006

2005

($ in thousands)

DEFERRED TAX ASSETS

Accrued expenses

$
1,031

$
1,101

Accounts receivable

40

121

Inventory

2,308

4,707

Retirement and compensation related accruals

5,490

5,601

Fixed assets

2,537

—

Federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards

14,690

14,700

Real estate leases, including deferred rent

12,511

11,764

Losses on investments

3,714

4,000

Goodwill

7,264

7,897

Other

542

354

Gross deferred tax assets before valuation allowance

50,127

50,245

Less: valuation allowance

(11,350
)
(8,763
)
Total deferred tax assets

$
38,777

$
41,482

DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES

Fixed assets

—

726

Total deferred tax liabilities

—

726

NET DEFERRED TAX ASSET

$
38,777

$
40,756


	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006

	($ in thousands)
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS
Accrued expenses	$	1,888		$	1,031
Inventory		5,459			2,308
Retirement and compensation related accruals		7,172			5,490
Fixed assets		3,532			2,537
Federal and state net operating loss and credit carryforwards		10,381			14,690
Real estate leases, including deferred rent		11,839			12,511
Losses on investments		2,475			3,714
Goodwill		6,251			7,264
Other		493			582

Gross deferred tax assets before valuation allowance		49,490			50,127
Less: valuation allowance		(7,736	)		(11,350	)

Total deferred tax assets	$	41,754		$	38,777


DEFERRED TAX LIABILITIES		—			—


NET DEFERRED TAX ASSET	$	41,754		$	38,777

The net deferred tax asset is classified on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:


	February 3,		January 28,
	2007		2006

	($ in thousands)
Current deferred tax asset	$	9,039	$	11,266
Non-current deferred tax asset, net		32,715		27,511

	$	41,754	$	38,777

January 28,

January 29,

2006

2005

($ in thousands)

Current deferred tax asset

$
11,266

$
15,526

Non-current deferred tax asset, net

27,511

25,230

$
38,777

$
40,756

~~F-17~~

The net deferred tax asset as of February 3, 2007 reflects the tax effect ($1.2 million) of the reduction of deductible temporary differences related to the extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill associated with the Musicland acquisition and the tax effect ($0.2 million) of the combined reductions in deductible temporary differences related to the exercise and cancellation of stock options accounted for under SFAS No. 123(R),Share-Based Payment, charged to Additional Paid-In Capital and to changes in the Company’s pension liability accounted for under SFAS No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, charged to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss.

The net deferred tax asset as of January 28, 2006, reflects the tax effect ($1.5 million) of the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (see Note 2 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and the tax effect ($0.04 million) of the reduction of a deductible temporary difference related to restricted stock that was charged to Additional Paid In-In Capital.

As disclosed in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company acquired the remaining 29% interest in Second Spin, Inc. (“Second Spin”) during 2004. In connection with this step acquisition transaction, deferred tax assets amounting to $1.4 million were recorded at the date of the acquisition related to the tax effects of Second Spin’s federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and other deductible temporary differences. Prior to this acquisition, a valuation allowance in the amount of the gross deferred tax asset had been recorded as management considered it more likely than not that the net operating loss carryforwards would not be realized by Second Spin as a separate entity. Second Spin has been merged into the Company and inclusion in the Company’s consolidated tax return will enable substantially all of these net operating loss carryforwards to be utilized within the expiration periods.

The Company had a net operating loss carryforward of ~~$6.5~~$1.8 million for federal income tax purposes and ~~$203.2~~$161.4 million for state income tax purposes as of the end of ~~2005~~Fiscal 2006 that expire at various times through 2025 and are subject to certain limitations and statutory expiration periods. The state net operating loss carryforwards are subject to various business apportionment factors and multiple jurisdictional requirements when utilized.

In addition, the Company has capital loss carryforwards of ~~$6.4~~$3.5 million for federal income tax purposes which expire in Fiscal 2007. A 100% valuation allowance has been established against the deferred tax asset related to these capital loss carryforwards.

In assessing the propriety of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income. Management considers the scheduled reversal of ~~deferred tax liabilities,~~taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon ~~the level~~historic and projected levels of ~~projected future~~ taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, and tax planning strategies, the valuation allowance ~~was increased~~decreased from ~~$8.8~~$11.4 million to ~~$11.4~~$7.7 million, a level where management believes that it is more likely than not that the tax benefit will be realized. The net ~~increase~~decrease in the valuation allowance included a ~~$2.8~~$2.2 million ~~increase~~decrease reflected as state income taxes, net of federal tax effect, ~~offset~~due to the closing of tax examinations and higher taxable income realized in Fiscal 2006 and $0.4 million included in income taxes related to the extraordinary gain for unallocated negative goodwill. The federal

valuation allowance was decreased by ~~a $0.2~~$1.1 million ~~decrease~~ to account for the reduction in the deferred tax ~~assets~~asset attributable to losses on investments resulting from an investment gain. ~~The valuation allowance increase principally relates to deferred~~

During Fiscal 2006, the Company received a net income tax assets attributable to state net operating losses and other deductible temporary differences impacted by lower future taxable income projections in certain states’ expiration periods and by changes in legislation, notably Ohio tax reform legislation enacted during 2005. The Ohio legislation phases out the state corporate franchise tax, and, based on management’s estimates, certain Ohio deferred tax assets, principally net operating losses, will not be realized during the phase-out period.

refund of approximately $0.1 million. The Company paid income taxes, net of refunds, of approximately $4.7 million and $12.5 million during Fiscal 2005 and ~~$2.9 million during 2005,~~ 2004, ~~and 2003,~~ respectively.

Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies

During 2000, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware issued an opinion upholding the IRS’ disallowance of deductions of interest expense related to corporate-owned life insurance policies through fiscal 1994. The original accrual for additional income taxes resulting from disallowed interest expense deductions was recorded following the 2000 court decision. During 2003, the Company and the IRS agreed on final computational and payment terms for an amount less than previously accrued, which resulted in an income tax benefit of $2.1 million in 2003. Under the final payment terms, the Company has agreed with the IRS to make annual interest payments and a final principal payment of approximately $7.1 million in 2007. The remaining accrued ~~liabilities~~liability attributable to this matter as of ~~January 28, 2006~~February 3, 2007, including accrued interest, is $7.2 million which is recorded in income taxes payable in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, there is an accrued liability of $1.5 million, representing exposure to potential state income taxes associated with this matter included in deferred rent and ~~January 29, 2005 are~~other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of February 3, 2007. The entire accrued liability of $8.7 million, ~~which are~~including accrued interest, was included in deferred rent and other long-term liabilities in the Consolidated Balance ~~Sheets.~~Sheets as of January 28, 2006.

~~During 2005,~~In March 2006, the Company acquired an 80% interest in Mix & Burn LLC, a ~~newly formed~~ company that is fully consolidated for financial ~~reporting purposes.~~reporting. The ~~Company’s~~Company has committed funding of ~~$3.0~~$5.2 million, ~~over a period of three years,~~ of which ~~$1.0~~$4.0 million ~~was~~has been funded as of ~~January 28, 2006.~~

February 3, 2007.

The Company is subject to other legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of its business and have not been finally adjudicated. Although there can be no assurance as to the ultimate disposition of these matters, it is management’s opinion, based upon the information available at this time, that the expected outcome of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company.

Note 8. Leases

As more fully discussed in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Company leases its Albany, NY distribution center and administrative offices under three capital lease arrangements with its Chief Executive Officer and largest shareholder.

Fixed assets recorded under capital leases, which are included in fixed assets on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, are as follows:

~~F-18~~

January 28,

January 29,

2006

2005

($ in thousands)

Buildings

$
9,342

$
9,342

Fixtures and equipment

12,824

—

22,166

9,342

Allowances for depreciation and amortization

(7,170
)
(4,938
)

$
14,996

$
4,404


	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006

	($ in thousands)
Buildings	$	9,342		$	9,342
Fixtures and equipment		12,824			12,824

		22,166			22,166

Allowances for depreciation and amortization		(10,325	)		(7,170	)

	$	11,841		$	14,996

The Company leases ~~781~~991 stores under operating leases, many of which contain renewal options, for periods ranging from five to twenty-five years, with the majority being ten years. Most leases also provide for payment of operating expenses and real estate taxes. Some also provide for additional rent based on a percentage of sales.

Net rental expense was as follows:

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

2003

($ in thousands)

Minimum rentals

$
108,581

$
115,422

$
118,392

Contingent rentals

1,226

1,372

1,279

$
109,807

$
116,794

$
119,671


	Fiscal Year

	2006		2005		2004

	($ in thousands)
Minimum rentals	$	130,802	$	108,581	$	115,422
Contingent rentals		1,453		1,226		1,372

	$	132,255	$	109,807	$	116,794

Future minimum rental payments required under all leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year at ~~January 28, 2006~~February 3, 2007 are as follows:

Operating

Capital

Leases

Leases

($ in thousands)

2006

101,583

5,195

2007

87,279

4,830

2008

69,412

4,709

2009

50,407

4,709

2010

32,966

2,709

Thereafter

50,596

9,356

Total minimum payments required

$
392, 243

$
31,508

Less: amounts representing interest

13,439

Present value of minimum lease payments

18,069

Less: current portion

3,182

Long-term capital lease obligations

$
14,887


	Operating		Capital
	Leases		Leases

	($ in thousands)
2007		116,934		4,831
2008		100,935		4,709
2009		62,197		4,709
2010		42,637		2,709
2011		27,363		1,963
Thereafter		48,293		7,392

Total minimum payments required	$	398,359	$	26,313

Less: amounts representing interest				11,426

Present value of minimum lease payments				14,887
Less: current portion				2,887

Long-term capital lease obligations			$	12,000

Interest rates on capital leases were between 5.65% ~~to 27%~~and 28% per annum.

During 2005, the Company financed the replacement of its point-of-sale system through a capital lease arrangement in the amount of $12.0 million. The lease arrangement has an average interest rate of 5.76% and will be repaid in monthly installments of approximately $229,000 ~~over 5 years.~~through June 2010. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, the outstanding balance on ~~the~~this lease was ~~$10.4~~$8.2 million.

Note 9. Benefit Plans

401(k) Savings Plan

The Company offers a 401(k) Savings Plan to eligible employees meeting certain age and service requirements. This plan permits participants to contribute up to ~~20%~~80% of their salary, including bonuses, up to the maximum allowable by IRS regulations. Participants are immediately vested in their voluntary contributions plus actual earnings thereon. Participant vesting of the Company’s matching and profit sharing contribution is based

~~F-19~~

on the years of service completed by the participant. Participants are fully vested upon the completion of four years of service. All participant forfeitures of non-vested benefits are used to reduce the Company’s contributions in future years. Total expense related to the Plan was approximately $1,003,000, $957,000 and $897,000 in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and ~~$858,000 in 2005,~~ 2004, ~~and 2003,~~ respectively.

Stock ~~Option~~Award Plans

The Company has six employee stock ~~option~~award plans, the 1986 Stock Option Plan, the 1994 Stock Option Plan, the 1998 Stock Option Plan, the 1999 Stock Option Plan and the 2002 Stock Option Plan (the “Old Plans”); and the 2005 Long Term Incentive Share Plan (the “New Plan”). The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors may grant options to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock to employees of the Company at the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. ~~Under the New and Old Plans, options generally become exercisable commencing one year from the date of grant in increments of 25% per year with a maximum term of ten years.~~ The Company has stopped issuing stock options under the Old Plans.

Under the New Plan, the Company generally issues Stock-Settled Appreciation Rights (“SSARS”) that become exercisable in 50% increments commencing three years from the date of grant and have a maximum term of ten years from issuance.

Options and SSARS authorized for issuance under the Old and New Plans ~~totaled~~total 19.8 million. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, of the options authorized for issuance under the Old Plans and New ~~Plans, 9.5~~Plan, 9.7 million were granted and are outstanding, ~~7.1~~7.4 million of which were vested and exercisable. Options available for future grants at February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006 were 3.7 million and ~~January 29, 2005 were~~ 4.7 million, ~~and 1.6 million,~~ respectively.

Under the terms of the Camelot merger agreement, all options issued under the Camelot 1998 Stock Option Plan (the “Camelot Plan”) were converted to the Company’s options. The Camelot Plan provided for the granting of either incentive stock options or nonqualified stock options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock. Vesting of the options was originally over a four-year period with a maximum term of ten years. Based on the terms of the Camelot Plan, vesting was accelerated based on the market performance of the Company’s common stock whereby 50% of the options vested on March 13, 1998. The remaining 50% vested on April 22, 1999 in connection with the merger. At ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, 16,950 options were outstanding and exercisable. The Company stopped issuing stock options under the Camelot Stock Option Plan as of April 22, 1999.

The following table summarizes information about the stock ~~options~~awards outstanding under the Old Plans, the New Plan and the Camelot Plan as of ~~January 28, 2006:~~February 3, 2007:

Outstanding

Exercisable

Exercise
Price Range

Shares

Average
Remaining
Life

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Price

Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Price

$0.00-$2.66

94,577

0.3

$
1.58

$
325,345

94,577

$
1.58

$
325,345

2.67-5.33

2,219,973

6.9

3.52

3,329,960

684,698

3.57

992,812

5.34-8.00

427,500

8.7

7.21

—

32,500

7.39

—

8.01-10.00

2,008,371

5.8

8.43

—

1,499,097

8.57

—

10.01-13.33

3,124,500

5.0

10.90

—

3,110,250

10.90

—

13.34-16.00

1,466,565

7.6

14.56

—

1,466,565

14.56

—

16.01-18.67

178,050

2.2

17.79

—

178,050

17.79

—

18.68-24.00

2,000

2.9

23.75

—

2,000

23.75

—

Total

9,521,536

6.1

$
9.10

$
3,655,305

7,067,737

$
10.49

$
1,318,157



	Outstanding								Exercisable

Exercise Price Range	Shares		Average Remaining Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value

$2.67-$5.33		2,841,273		6.9	$	4.08	$	4,858,577		887,890	$	3.55	$	1,988,874
5.34-8.00		393,500		8.7		6.97		5,625		76,875		7.17		—
8.01-10.00		1,913,810		4.7		8.44		—		1,913,810		8.44		—
10.01-13.33		3,000,200		3.9		10.92		—		2,992,700		10.92		—
13.34-16.00		1,365,995		6.4		14.57		—		1,365,995		14.57		—
16.01-18.67		173,925		1.2		17.79		—		173,925		17.79		—
18.68-24.00		2,000		0.0		23.75		—		2,000		23.75		—

Total		9,690,703		5.4	$	8.91	$	4,864,202		7,413,195	$	10.20	$	1,988,874

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pretax intrinsic value based on the Company’s closing stock price of ~~$5.02~~$5.79 as of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, which would have been received by the ~~option~~award holders had all ~~option~~award holders under the Old Plans, New Plan and Camelot Plans exercised their ~~options~~awards as of that date. The total number of in-the-money ~~options~~awards exercisable as of ~~January 28, 2006~~February 3, 2007 was ~~779,275.~~

887,890.

The Company also has a stock ~~option~~award plan for non-employee directors (the “1990 Plan”). ~~Options~~Awards under this plan are granted at an exercise price determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Under the 1990 Plan, ~~options~~awards generally become exercisable commencing one year from the date of grant in increments of 25% per year with a maximum term of ten years. In addition, directors of the Company receive annual grants of deferred shares of Common Stock (“Deferred Shares”) issued under this plan which vest equally in three years from date of grant. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, there were 750,000 ~~options~~awards authorized for issuance and ~~333,526 options~~363,401 awards have been granted and are outstanding, ~~140,014~~142,161 of which were vested and exercisable. There are ~~118,480~~54,105 shares of common stock reserved for possible future option grants under the 1990 Plan.

In connection with the Company’s merger with Camelot in April 1999 all options issued under the Camelot Outside Director Stock Option Plan (the “Camelot Director Plan”) were converted to the Company’s options. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, there were 4,750 options outstanding and exercisable under the Camelot Director Plan. The Company no longer issues options under the Camelot Director Plan.

~~F-20~~

The 1990 Plan and Camelot Director Plan are collectively referred to as the “Director Plans”.

The following table summarizes information about the stock ~~options~~awards outstanding under the ~~two~~ Director Plans at ~~January 28, 2006:~~February 3, 2007:

Outstanding

Exercisable

Exercise
Price Range

Shares

Average
Remaining
Life

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

Shares

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value

$0.00-$2.67

179,401

7.9

$
0.03

$
895,211

18,389

$
0.33

$
86,244

2.68-5.33

4,500

1.3

3.36

7,470

4,500

3.36

7,470

5.34-8.00

30,000

7.8

6.44

—

15,000

6.44

—

8.01-10.67

76,875

2.5

9.39

—

74,375

9.44

—

10.68-13.33

40,750

5.3

12.41

—

25,750

11.90

—

13.34-16.00

6,750

1.6

15.12

—

6,750

15.12

—

Total

338,276

6.2

$
4.56

$
902,681

144,764

$
8.48

$
93,714



	Outstanding								Exercisable

Exercise Price Range	Shares		Average Remaining Life		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value

$0.00-$2.67		249,901		8.1	$	0.00	$	1,446,927		47,411	$	0.00	$	274,510
2.68-5.33		4,500		0.2		3.36		10,935		4,500		3.36		10,935
5.34-8.00		30,000		6.8		6.44		—		22,500		6.44		—
8.01-10.00		26,000		4.4		8.66		—		26,000		8.66		—
10.01-13.33		53,250		3.8		11.80		—		42,000		11.40		—
13.34-16.00		4,500		1.2		15.12		—		4,500		15.12		—

Total		368,151		6.9	$	3.07	$	1,457,862		146,911	$	6.35	$	285,445

The aggregate intrinsic value in the preceding table represents the total pretax intrinsic value based on the Company’s closing stock price of ~~$5.02~~$5.79 as of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, which would have been received by the ~~option~~award holders had all ~~option~~award holders under the ~~two~~ Director Plans exercised their ~~options~~awards as of that date. The total number of in-the-money ~~options~~awards exercisable as of ~~January 28, 2006~~February 3, 2007 was ~~22,889.~~51,911.

The following tables summarize activity under the Stock ~~Option~~Award Plans:

Employee Stock Option Plans

Director Stock Option Plans

Number of
Shares Subject
To Option

Option
Price Range
Per Share

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

Number of
Shares Subject
To Option

Option
Price Range
Per Share

Weighted
Average
Exercise Price

Balance February 1, 2003

6,621,924

$ 1.21-$23.75

$
9.11

278,750

$ 1.18-$15.12

$
6.19

Granted

2,350,100

2.57-5.99

3.50

187,107

0.00-6.44

1.44

Exercised

(162,457
)
1.21-4.58

3.62

(36,786
)
0.00-2.09

1.28

Canceled

(363,176
)
2.57-18.00

9.24

(9,000
)
4.61-4.61

4.61

Balance January 31, 2004

8,446,391

$ 1.21-$23.75

$
7.63

420,071

$ 0.00-$15.12

$
4.98

Granted

1,299,250

7.50-10.31

10.30

62,080

0.00-0.00

0.00

Exercised

(706,614
)
1.21-10.92

3.54

(57,145
)
0.00-10.94

2.93

Canceled

(135,826
)
2.66-17.79

8.02

(30,111
)
0.00-8.95

0.52

Balance January 29, 2005

8,903,201

$ 1.21-$23.75

$
8.34

394,895

$ 0.00-$15.12

$
4.17

Granted

1,371,725

7.10-14.32

12.74

48,516

0.00-13.28

4.11

Exercised

(634,977
)
1.21-12.44

6.17

(78,000
)
1.18-3.68

3.12

Canceled

(118,413
)
3.50-17.79

10.31

(27,135
)
0.00-15.12

2.15

Balance January 28, 2006

9,521,536

$ 1.58-$23.75

$
9.10

338,276

$ 0.00-$15.12

$
4.56


	Employee Stock Award Plans						Director Stock Award Plans

	Number of Shares Subject To Option		Option Price Range Per Share	Weighted Average Exercise Price			Number of Shares Subject To Option		Option Price Range Per Share	Weighted Average Exercise Price

Balance January 31, 2004	8,446,391		$1.21-$23.75		$	7.63	420,071		$0.00-$15.12		$	4.98
Granted	1,299,250		7.50-10.31			10.30	62,080		0.00-0.00			0.00
Exercised	(706,614	)	1.21-10.92			3.54	(57,145	)	0.00-10.94			2.93
Canceled	(135,826	)	2.66-17.79			8.02	(30,111	)	0.00-8.95			0.52

Balance January 29, 2005	8,903,201		$1.21-$23.75		$	8.34	394,895		$0.00-$15.12		$	4.17
Granted	1,371,725		7.10-14.32			12.74	48,516		0.00-13.28			4.11
Exercised	(634,977	)	1.21-12.44			6.17	(78,000	)	1.18-3.68			3.12
Canceled	(118,413	)	3.50-17.79			10.31	(27,135	)	0.00-15.12			2.15

Balance January 28, 2006	9,521,536		$1.58-$23.75		$	9.10	338,276		$0.00-$15.12		$	4.56
Granted	987,675		5.32-7.29			5.38	105,000		0.00-0.00			0.00
Exercised	(232,762	)	1.58-3.96			2.73	(34,500	)	0.00-1.35			0.18
Canceled	(585,746	)	2.80-17.79			8.48	(40,625	)	8.02-15.12			10.05

Balance February 3, 2007	9,690,703		$3.16-$23.75		$	8.91	368,151		$0.00-$15.12		$	3.07	��

During Fiscal 2006, 2005 ~~2004~~ and ~~2003,~~2004, the Company recognized expenses of approximately $477,000, $296,000 ~~$218,000~~ and ~~$50,000,~~$218,000, respectively, for ~~stock options~~deferred shares issued to non-employee directors at an exercise price below the closing stock price on the date of grant.

Restricted Stock Plan

Under the 1990 Restricted Stock Plan, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is authorized to grant awards for up to 900,000 restricted shares of Common Stock to executive officers and other key employees of the Company. The shares are issued as restricted stock and are held in the custody of the Company until all vesting restrictions are satisfied. If conditions or terms under which an award is granted are not satisfied, the shares are forfeited. Shares vest under these grants over a period of two to five years, with vesting criteria that includes continuous employment until applicable vesting dates have expired. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, a total of 330,000 shares have been granted, of which ~~262,000~~240,000 shares ~~had~~have vested and 85,000 shares had been forfeited. Unearned compensation is recorded at the date of award, based on the market value of the shares, and is included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity and is amortized over the applicable vesting period. The amount amortized to expense in Fiscal 2006, 2005 ~~2004~~ and ~~2003,~~2004, net of the impact of forfeitures, was approximately $13,000, $16,000 ~~$28,000~~ and ~~$93,000,~~$28,000, respectively. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~February 3, 2007, outstanding awards and shares available for grant totaled 5,000 and ~~633,000~~655,000, respectively.

~~F-21~~

Defined Benefit Plans

The Company maintains a non-qualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”) for certain ~~executive officers~~Executive Officers of the Company. The SERP, which is unfunded, provides eligible executives defined pension benefits that supplement benefits under other retirement arrangements. The annual benefit amount is based on salary and bonus at the time of retirement and number of years of service.

The Company provides the Board of Directors with a noncontributory, unfunded retirement plan (“Director Retirement Plan”) that pays a retired director an annual retirement benefit equal to 60% of the annual retainer at the time of retirement plus a 3% annual increase through the final payment. Payments begin at age 62 or retirement, whichever is later, and continue for 10 years or the life of the director and his or her spouse, whichever period is shorter. Partial vesting in the retirement plan begins after six years of continuous service. Participants become fully vested after 12 years of continuous service on the Board. ~~The Company accounts for the SERP and the Director Retirement Plan in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 87,~~ ~~Employers’ Accounting for Pensions~~.

For 2005, 2004 and 2003, net periodic pension costs recognized under both plans totaled approximately $1.9 million, $1.4 million, and $1.2 million, respectively. The accrued pension liability for the plans, which is included in accrued expenses and other in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, was approximately $15.2 million and $12.0 million at January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005, respectively. In addition, an intangible asset, which is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to reflect the excess of the accumulated benefit obligation over the fair value of plan assets, net of accrued pension costs, of approximately $3.7 million and $4.1 million was recorded at January 28, 2006 and January 29, 2005.

The measurement date for the SERP and Director Retirement Plan is November 1 of each year using actuarial techniques which reflect estimates for mortality, turnover and expected retirement. In addition, management makes assumptions concerning future salary increases. Generally discount rates are established as of the measurement date using theoretical bond models that select high-grade corporate bonds with maturities or coupons that correlate to the expected payouts of the applicable liabilities.

After June 1, 2003, new directors were not covered by the ~~retirement plan.~~Director Retirement Plan. Directors who were not yet vested in their retirement benefits as of June 1, 2003 had the present value of benefits already accrued as of the effective date converted to Deferred Shares under the Directors Plan. Directors that were fully or partially vested in their retirement benefits were given a one time election to continue to participate in the current retirement program or convert the present value of benefits already accrued to Deferred Shares under the Directors Plan as of the effective date.

The Company accounts for the SERP and the Director Retirement Plan in accordance with SFAS No 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit and Other Postretirement Plans – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R). SFAS No. 158 requires that the funded status of defined benefit pension plans, or the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit obligation, be recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. This differs from the accounting under SFAS No. 87, which required the difference between the fair value of plan assets and the accumulated benefit obligation to be recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. SFAS No. 158 does not

require retrospective application. Accordingly, the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of January 28, 2006 has not been restated. SFAS No. 158 also requires that defined benefit plan assets and obligations be measured as of the date of the employer’s fiscal year-end statement of financial position, however, this requirement of the statement is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2008. Accordingly, the Company has not adopted this provision of SFAS No. 158 for the year ended February 3, 2007, however this provision will be adopted in accordance with the aforementioned requirements. For Fiscal 2006 and 2005, the measurement date for the plans is November 1.

As a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 158, the following incremental impacts were recognized in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of February 3, 2007:


Balance Sheet Impact of SFAS No. 158 Adoption

	Before Adoption of SFAS No. 158			Adjustments				After Adoption of SFAS No. 158

	($ in thousands)

Deferred taxes		$	31,092		$	1,623			$	32,715
Other assets			15,767			(3,400	)			12,367

Total Assets			831,467			(1,777	)			829,690

Deferred rent and other liabilities			39,740			508				40,248

Total Liabilities			435,977			508				436,485

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)			397			(2,285	)			(1,888	)

Total Shareholder’s Equity		$	395,490		$	(2,285	)		$	393,205

For Fiscal 2006, 2005 and 2004, net periodic pension cost recognized under both plans totaled approximately $2.2 million, $1.9 million, and $1.4 million, respectively. The accrued pension liability for the plans was approximately $13.3 million and $15.2 million at February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, respectively. In addition, an intangible asset, which is included in other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to reflect the amount of projected benefit obligation representing unrecognized prior service cost, of approximately $3.7 million was recorded at January 28, 2006. Under SFAS 158, no intangible asset representing unrecognized prior service cost is recorded as of February 3, 2007.

The following is a summary of the Company’s defined benefit pension plans as of the most recent actuarial calculations:


Obligation and Funded Status:

	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006

	($ in thousands)
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	16,108		$	14,232
Service cost		679			531
Interest cost		885			782
Actuarial (gain)* / loss		(4,346	)		604
Benefits paid		(50	)		(41	)

Projected Benefit obligation at end of year	$	13,276		$	16,108


Fair value of plan assets at end of year		—			—

Reconciliation of Funded Status:
Funded status		(13,276	)		(16,108	)
Unrecognized prior service cost		3,400			3,742
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) / loss		(171	)		4,451

Accrued benefit cost		(10,047	)		(7,915	)
Additional liability		(3,229	)		(7,279	)

Accrued pension liability	$	(13,276	)	$	(15,194	)

~~Obligation and Funded Status:~~

January 28,

January 29,

2006

2005

($ in thousands)

Change in Benefit Obligation:

Benefit obligation at beginning of year

$
14,232

$
10,476

Service cost

531

402

Interest cost

782

628

Actuarial loss

604

2,767

Benefits paid

(41
)
(41
)
Benefit obligation at end of year

$
16,108

$
14,232

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

—

—

Reconciliation of Funded Status:

Funded status

(16,108
)
(14,232
)
Unrecognized prior service cost

3,742

4,084

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

4,451

4,090

Accrued pension cost

(7,915
)
(6,058
)
Additional minimum liability (“AML”)

(7,279
)
(5,925
)
Accrued pension liability including AML

$
(15,194
)
$
(11,983
)

~~Amounts recognized~~* The actuarial gain of $4.3 million in Fiscal 2006 is due to the non-vested termination of two plan participants, an increase in the ~~Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:~~

January 28,

January 29,

2006

2005

($ in thousands)

Accrued pension liability, including additional minimum liability

$
(15,194
)
$
(11,983
)
Intangible assets

3,742

4,084

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

3,537

1,841

Net amount recognized

$
(7,915
)
$
(6,058
)

~~F-22~~discount rate from 5.50% to 5.75% and a 5 year extension of the assumed retirement age for the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.


Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets consist of:

	February 3, 2007			January 28, 2006

	($ in thousands)

Accrued pension liability	$	(13,276	)	$	(15,194	)
Intangible assets		—			3,742
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		1,888			2,048
Deferred tax asset		1,341			1,489

Net amount recognized	$	(10,047	)	$	(7,915	)

The accumulated benefit obligation for the plans was $12.8 million and $15.2 million at February 3, 2007 and ~~$12.0 million at~~ January 28, 2006, ~~and January 29, 2005,~~ respectively, which exceeds plan assets ($0).

Information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:


	February 3, 2007		January 28, 2006

	$ in thousands
Projected benefit obligation	$	13,276	$	16,108
Accumulated benefit obligation	$	12,768	$	15,194
Fair value of plan assets		—		—


Components of Net Periodic Pension Cost:

*($ in thousands)*	2006		Fiscal Year 2005		2004

Service cost	$	679	$	531	$	402
Interest cost		885		782		628
Amortization of prior service cost		343		342		342
Amortization of net loss		275		243		18

Net periodic pension cost	$	2,182	$	1,898	$	1,390

During Fiscal 2006, the pre-tax amounts recognized in other comprehensive income are summarized below:

January 28,

January 29,

2006

2005

$ in thousands

Projected benefit obligation

$
16,108

$
14,232

Accumulated benefit obligation

$
15,194

$
11,983

Fair value of plan assets

—

—


($ in thousands)	Fiscal Year 2006
Net prior service recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost	$	343
Net actuarial loss recognized as a component of net periodic pension cost		275
Net actuarial gain arising during the period		3,598

		4,216
Income tax effect		1,771

Other comprehensive income	$	2,445

~~Components~~The pre-tax components of ~~Net Periodic Pension Cost:~~accumulated other comprehensive loss, which have not yet been recognized as components of net periodic pension cost as of February 3, 2007 are summarized below.

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

2003

Service cost

$
531

$
402

$
224

Interest cost

782

628

629

Amortization of prior service cost

342

342

385

Amortization of net (gain) / loss

243

18

—

Net periodic pension cost

$
1,898

$
1,390

$
1,238

~~Assumptions:~~

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:

Discount rate

5.50
%
5.50
%

Salary increase rate

4.00
%
4.00
%

Measurement date

Nov 1, 2005

Nov 1, 2004

Fiscal Year

2005

2004

2003

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost:

Discount rate

5.50
%
6.00
%
6.50
%

Salary increase rate

4.00
%
4.00
%
4.00
%


($ in thousands)		February 3, 2007

Net unrecognized actuarial gain	$	(171	)
Net unrecognized prior service cost		3,400

Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	3,229

In Fiscal 2007, approximately $342,000 of net unrecognized prior service cost and approximately $2,000 of the net unrecognized actuarial gain, recorded as components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at February 3, 2007, will be recognized as components of net periodic pension cost.


Assumptions:

	Fiscal Year

	2006		2005

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine benefit obligation:
Discount rate	5.75	%	5.50	%
Salary increase rate	4.00	%	4.00	%
Measurement date	Nov 1, 2006		Nov 1, 2005


	Fiscal Year
	2006		2005		2004

Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic pension cost:
Discount rate	5.75	%	5.50	%	6.00	%
Salary increase rate	4.00	%	4.00	%	4.00	%

The Company expects to make ~~$50,000~~$50,450 in benefit payments during ~~2006.~~2007.

~~Additional Information:~~

January 28,

January 29,

2006

2005

($ in thousands)

Increase in additional minimum liability included in other comprehensive loss, before income taxes

$
1,696

$
1,841

Balance of additional minimum liability included in other comprehensive loss, before income taxes

$
3,537

$
1,841

Income taxes related to additional minimum liability included in other comprehensive loss

$
1,489

$
747

Balance, net of income taxes, of additional minimum liability included in other comprehensive loss

$
2,048

$
1,094

The discount rate is based on the rates implicit in high-quality fixed-income investments currently available as of the measurement date. The Citigroup Pension Discount Curve (CPDC) rates are intended to represent the spot rates implied by the high quality corporate bond market in the U.S. The projected benefit payments attributed to the projected benefit obligation have been discounted using the CPDC mid-year rates and the discount rate is the single constant rate that produces the same total present value.

The following benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate, are expected to be paid:

~~F-23~~



Year	Pension Benefits

	*($ in thousands)*

2007	$	50
2008		51
2009		64
2010		101
2011		143
2012 and thereafter	$	6,091

Year

Pension Benefits

($ in thousands)

2006

$
50

2007

1,181

2008

1,181

2009

1,194

2010

1,232

2011 and thereafter

7,101

Note 10. Shareholders’ Equity

On May 28, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of 10 million outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock from time to time on the open market. The Company had repurchased 15 million shares of common stock under previously announced programs. As of ~~January 28, 2006,~~the end of Fiscal 2005, the Company had purchased the 10 million shares outstanding under the stock repurchase program, at a total cost of $88.5 ~~million and there were~~million. There are currently no shares remaining to be purchased under the current program. During 2005 the Company purchased 3.1 million shares at a total cost of $31.3 million. The Company had completed the purchase of 15.0 million shares at a total cost of $128.7 million under earlier authorized programs.repurchase programs outstanding. As of February 3, 2007 and January 28, 2006, ~~and January 29, 2005,~~ the Company held ~~25,104,990~~25,103,990 and ~~21,988,949~~25,104,990 shares, respectively, in treasury stock.

The Company has never declared dividends on its Common Stock and does not plan to pay cash dividends on its Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The Company’s credit agreement does not restrict the payment of cash dividends so long as payment conditions per the agreement are met. Any future determination as to the payment of dividends will depend upon capital requirements, limitations imposed by the Company’s ~~credit agreement~~Credit Agreement (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and other factors the Company’s Board of Directors may consider.

Note 11. Related Party Transactions

The Company leases its ~~168,400~~181,300 square foot distribution center/office facility in Albany, New York from Robert J. Higgins, its Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and largest shareholder, under three capital leases that expire in the year 2015. The original distribution center/office facility was ~~constructed~~occupied in 1985.

Under the three capital leases, dated April 1, 1985, November 1, 1989 and September 1, 1998 (the “Leases”), the Company paid Mr. Higgins an annual rent of ~~$1.9~~$2.0 million, ~~$1.8~~$1.9 million and $1.8 million in ~~2004, 2003~~Fiscal 2006, 2005 and ~~2002~~2004 respectively. Pursuant to the terms of the lease agreements, effective January 1, 2002 and every two years thereafter, rental payments will increase in accordance with the biennial increase in the Consumer Price Index. Under the terms of the lease agreements, the Company is responsible for property taxes, insurance and other operating costs with respect to the premises. Mr. Higgins’ obligation for principal and interest on his underlying indebtedness relating to the real property is approximately $1.1 million per year. None of the leases contain any real property purchase options at the expiration of ~~their terms.~~its term.

The Company leases oneof its retail stores from Mr. Higgins under an operating lease. Annual rental payments under this lease were $40,000 in Fiscal 2006, 2005 ~~2004~~ and ~~2003.~~2004. Under the terms of the lease, the Company pays property taxes, maintenance and a contingent rental if a specified sales level is achieved. Total additional charges for the store, including contingent rent, were approximately $4,100, $4,400 and $14,500 in Fiscal 2006, 2005 and ~~$4,600 in 2005,~~ 2004 ~~and 2003~~ respectively.

Michael Solow, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors, is a partner of the law firm Kaye Scholer LLP, which rendered legal services to the Company in Fiscal 2004 ~~and 2003~~ for which the Company incurred fees of ~~$115,000 and $202,000 respectively.~~$115,000. Kaye Scholer concluded its representation of the Company in Fiscal 2004.

~~F-24~~

Note 12. Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)


	Fiscal 2006 Quarter Ended

	2006		2/03/07		10/28/06			7/29/06			4/29/06

	($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)

Sales	$	1,471,157	$	586,680	$	297,679		$	298,261		$	288,537
Gross profit		519,222		203,755		108,811			106,212			100,444
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain - unallocated negative goodwill		948		32,461		(13,305	)		(10,217	)		(7,991	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes		10,721		5,387		1,925			2,475			934

Net income (loss)	$	11,669	$	37,848	$	(11,380	)	$	(7,742	)	$	(7,057	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill	$	0.03	$	1.05	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.26	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes		0.35		0.18		0.06			0.08			0.03

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.38	$	1.23	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.23	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill	$	0.03	$	1.00	$	(0.43	)	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.26	)
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes		0.33		0.17		0.06			0.08			0.03

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.36	$	1.17	$	(0.37	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.23	)


	Fiscal 2005 Quarter Ended

	2005			1/28/06			10/29/05			7/30/05			4/30/05

	($ in thousands, except for per share amounts)

Sales	$	1,238,486		$	458,563		$	241,395		$	253,118		$	285,410
Gross profit		431,613			151,175			82,998			92,875			104,565
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		2,886			22,255			(11,468	)		(6,947	)		(954	)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes		(2,277	)		(2,277	)		—			—			—

Net income (loss)	$	609		$	19,976		$	(11,468	)	$	(6,947	)	$	(954	)

Basic earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.09		$	0.72		$	(0.36	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.03	)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.07	)		—			—			—

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.02		$	0.65		$	(0.36	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.03	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.09		$	0.70		$	(0.36	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.03	)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.07	)		—			—			—

Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.02		$	0.63		$	(0.36	)	$	(0.21	)	$	(0.03	)

Fiscal 2005 Quarter Ended

2005

1/28/06

10/29/05

7/30/05

4/30/05

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

Sales

$
1,238,486

$
458,563

$
241,395

$
253,118

$
285,410

Gross profit

431,613

151,175

82,998

92,875

104,565

Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

2,886

22,255

(11,468
)
(6,947
)
(954
)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes

(2,277
)
(2,277
)
—

—

—

Net income (loss)

$
609

$
19,976

$
(11,468
)
$
(6,947
)
$
(954
)
Basic earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
0.72

$
(0.36
)
$
(0.21
)
$
(0.03
)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes

$
(0.07
)
$
(0.07
)
—

—

—

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$
0.02

$
0.65

$
(0.36
)
$
(0.21
)
$
(0.03
)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle

$
0.09

$
0.70

$
(0.36
)
$
(0.21
)
$
(0.03
)
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, net of income taxes

$
(0.07
)
$
(0.07
)
—

—

—

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$
0.02

$
0.63

$
(0.36
)
$
(0.21
)
$
(0.03
)

Fiscal 2004 Quarter Ended

2004

1/29/05

10/30/04

7/31/04

5/1/04

($ in thousands, except per share amounts)

Sales

$
1,365,133

$
513,455

$
270,013

$
277,182

$
304,483

Gross profit

495,134

178,823

99,968

103,038

113,305

Income (loss) before extraordinary gain

38,675

34,679

(5,174
)
7,129

2,041

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes

3,166

—

570

2,178

418

Net income (loss)

$
41,841

$
34,679

$
(4,604
)
$
9,307

$
2,459

Basic earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain

$
1.12

$
1.04

$
(0.15
)
$
0.20

$
0.06

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes

$
0.09

—

$
0.01

0.06

0.01

Basic earnings (loss) per share

$
1.21

$
1.04

$
(0.14
)
$
0.26

$
0.07

Diluted earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain

$
1.06

$
0.98

$
(0.15
)
$
0.19

$
0.06

Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill, net of income taxes

$
0.09

—

$
0.01

0.06

0.01

Diluted earnings (loss) per share

$
1.15

$
0.98

$
(0.14
)
$
0.25

$
0.07

~~Note 13. Subsequent Event~~

Effective March 27, 2006, the Company executed a definitive agreement to acquire the net assets of Musicland Holding Corp. (“Musicland”). Musicland, an entertainment specialty retailer which operates retail stores and Web sites under the names Sam Goody (www.SamGoody.com), Suncoast Motion Picture Company (www.Suncoast.com), On Cue and www.MediaPlay.com, filed a voluntary petition to restructure under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in January 2006. The acquisition of Musicland’s assets provides the Company with the ability to leverage their store locations, and strategically increase the Company’s national presence and provide further growth opportunities. The transaction represents total consideration of $104.2 million in cash and $18.1 million in assumed liabilities subject to certain post closing adjustments, including adjustments relating to the final determination of the value of the inventory. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company agreed to acquire the 335 of Musicland’s remaining 400 stores, with the remainder of the stores being liquidated under an agency agreement with Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC. As of the date of filing of this Report, the Company had not finalized the allocation of the purchase price.

~~F-25~~

On March 16, 2006, the Company acquired an 80% interest in a company that will be fully consolidated for financial reporting purposes in 2006. The Company has committed a total funding of $5.2 million over two years, of which $1.2 million was funded as of March 25, 2006.

Index to Exhibits

Document Number and Description

Exhibit No.

~~Exhibit No.~~
2.1		Asset Acquisition Agreement dated February 17, 2006, between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Musicland Holding Corp.-incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed February 22, 2006. Commission File No. 000-14818.

3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 1994. Commission File No. 0-14818.

3.2		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 29, 1994. Commission File No. 0-14818.

3.3		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 31, 1998. Commission File No. 0-14818.

3.4		*3.4 Amended By-Laws –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 29, 2000. Commission File No. 0-14818.

3.5		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of ~~Incorporation–~~Incorporation—incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, No. 333-75231.

3.6		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of ~~Incorporation–~~Incorporation—incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, No. 333-75231.

3.7		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of ~~Incorporation–~~Incorporation—incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 11, 2000. Commission File No. 0-14818.

3.8		Rights Agreement, between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services, L.L.C., as Rights Agent ~~–incorporated~~– incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-A filed August 11, 2000. Commission File ~~No.0-14818.~~No. 0-14818.

3.9		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation of Trans World Entertainment Corporation - incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-A filed August 11, 2000. Commission File No. 0-14818.

4.1		Credit Agreement dated January 5, 2006, between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Bank of America N.A. - incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 10, 2006. Commission File No. 0-14818.

4.2		First Amendment to Credit Agreement between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Bank of America N.A – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 23, 2006. Commission File No. 0-14818.

4.3	Second Amendment to Credit Agreement between Trans World Entertainment Corporation and Bank of America N.A – incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 23, 2006. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.1		Lease, dated April 1, 1985, between Robert J. Higgins, as Landlord, and Record Town, Inc. and Trans World Music Corporation, as Tenant and Amendment thereto dated April 28, 1986 –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, No. 33-6449.

10.2		Second Addendum, dated as of November 30, 1989, to Lease, dated April 1, 1985, among Robert J. Higgins, and Trans World Music Corporation, and Record Town, Inc., exercising five year renewal option –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 1990. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.3		Lease, dated November 1, 1989, between Robert J. Higgins, as Landlord, and Record Town, Inc. and Trans World Music Corporation, as Tenant –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 1991. Commission File No. 0-14818.


10.5		Lease dated September 1, 1998, between Robert J. Higgins, as Landlord, and Record Town, Inc. and Trans World Music Corporation, as Tenant, for additional office space at 38 Corporate Circle –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 1998. Commission File No. 0-14818.

~~F-26~~

~~10.6~~
10.6	Trans World Music Corporation 1986 Incentive and Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated, and Amendment No. 3 thereto –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 2, 1991. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.7		Trans World Music Corporation 1990 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, as amended and restated –— incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to Trans World’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 19, 2000. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.8		Trans World Entertainment Corporation Amended 1990 Restricted Stock Plan –— incorporated herein by reference to Annex B to Trans World’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 17, 1999. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.9		Trans World Entertainment Corporation 1994 Stock Option Plan –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 1994. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.10		Trans World Entertainment Corporation 1998 Stock Option Plan –— incorporated herein by reference to Annex B to Trans World’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 7, 1998. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.11		Trans World Entertainment Corporation 1999 Stock Option Plan –— incorporated herein by reference to Annex A to Trans World’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 7, 1998. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.12		Form of Indemnification Agreement dated May 1, 1995 between the Company and its officers and directors incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 29, 1995. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.13		Trans World Entertainment Corporation 1997 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended May 3, 1997. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.14		Employment Agreement, dated as of May 1, 2003, between the Company and Robert J. ~~Higgins incorporated~~Higgins. Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 1, 2003. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.15		Agreement dated September 19, 2003 by and between a joint venture composed of Trans World Entertainment Corporation, Hilco Merchant Resources, LLC, Hilco Real Estate, LLC Gordon Brothers Retail Partners, LLC and The Ozer Group LLC as Agent and Wherehouse Entertainment, Inc., as Merchant to acquire certain assets of Wherehouse Entertainment Inc. –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.16		Amendment No.1 dated October 1, 2003 to the agency agreement dated September 19, 2003 –— incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2003. Commission File No. 0-14818.

10.17		Trans World Entertainment Corporation 2005 Long Term Incentive and Share Award Plan incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to Trans ~~World’s~~World Entertainment Corporation’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Form 14A filed as of May 11, 2005. Commission ~~File~~ file No. 0-14818.

* 21		Significant Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

* 23		Consent of KPMG ~~LLP.~~LLP.

*31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer dated April ~~14, 2005,~~19, 2007, relating to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended ~~January 28, 2006.~~February 3, 2007.

*31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer dated April ~~14, 2005,~~19, 2007, relating to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended ~~January 28, 2006.~~February 3, 2007.


*32		Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Registrant, dated April ~~14, 2005,~~19, 2007, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 relating to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended ~~January 28, 2006.~~February 3, 2007.

*Filed herewith.

F-31

~~F-27~~

ý		xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

~~FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED JANUARY 28, 2006~~

OR

o		~~TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT~~

~~FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO~~

~~New York~~
New York	14-1541629
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)


Documents of Which Portions Are Incorporated by Reference		Parts of the Form 10-K into Which Portion of Documents are Incorporated

Proxy Statement for Trans World Entertainment Corporation’s June ~~7, 2006~~6, 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be filed on or about May 9, 2007		III

	Closing Sales Prices
	High		Low
2004
1^st Quarter	$	10.79	$	7.45
2^nd Quarter	$	10.65	$	9.38
3^rd Quarter	$	11.54	$	8.83
4^th Quarter	$	12.77	$	10.62

2005
1^st Quarter	$	15.39	$	12.55
2^nd Quarter	$	14.91	$	10.39
3^rd Quarter	$	10.74	$	6.39
4^th Quarter	$	6.95	$	4.74

2006
1^st Quarter (through March 31, 2006)	$	6.17	$	5.06


	Closing Sales Prices

	High		Low
2005
1^st Quarter	$	15.39	$	12.55
2^nd Quarter	$	14.91	$	10.39
3^rd Quarter	$	10.74	$	6.39
4^th Quarter	$	6.95	$	4.74

2006
1^st Quarter	$	6.17	$	5.06
2^nd Quarter	$	7.35	$	5.03
3^rd Quarter	$	6.50	$	5.50
4^th Quarter	$	6.88	$	5.45

2007
1^st Quarter (through March 30, 2007)	$	5.82	$	5.20

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

III

Company Background

f.y.e Movie stores. Saturday Matinee and f.y.e Movie stores specialize in the sale of DVD and related accessories. They are located in large, regional shopping malls and average 2,200 square feet. The Company operated 17 Saturday Matinee and f.y.e Movie stores at January 28, 2006.

Merchandise Categories

Business Environment

Competition

Seasonality

Trade Customs and Practices

Employees

Available Information

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


	•	highly competitive nature of the retail entertainment business;

	•	competitive pricing;

	•	adverse publicity;

	•	interest rate fluctuations;

	•	dependence on key employees;

	•	change in laws;

	•	accelerated declines in music CD industry sales;

	•	the Company’s level of debt and related restrictions and limitations;

	•	new product introductions (“hit releases”);

	•	future cash flows;

	•	availability of new real estate;

	•	new technology, including digital downloading; and

	•	product liability claims.


	•	the reported amounts and timing of revenue and expenses,

	•	the reported amounts and classification of assets and liabilities, and

	•	the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.


	Traditional stores. The Traditional store averages about 5,600 square feet and carries a full complement of entertainment software, including music, home video, video games and related accessories. There were 587 Traditional f.y.e. stores at the end of Fiscal 2006.

	Superstores. The Superstores carry the same merchandise categories as Traditional locations, but with a much broader and deeper assortment. This concept is a semi-anchor or destination location in major regional malls. There were 13 f.y.e. mall Superstores at the end of Fiscal 2006 that averaged about 24,000 square feet.

	Video only stores.At the end of Fiscal 2006, the Company operated 137 video only stores, under the Suncoast and Saturday Matinee brands. These stores specialize in the sale of home video and related accessories. They are located in large, regional shopping malls and average about 2,400 square feet.

	2005		Comparable Store Sales		2004		Comparable Store Sales		2003
Music:
Compact discs	53.0	%	(8.5	)%	53.9	%	(0.8	)%	53.9	%
Audio cassettes and singles	0.6		(42.5	)	1.1		(38.4	)	1.8
Total Music	53.6		(9.2	)	55.0		(2.0	)	55.7
Video:
DVD	28.4		0.7		26.4		14.6		23.6
VHS	1.6		(45.5	)	2.8		(35.3	)	4.6
Total Video	30.0		(3.7	)	29.2		6.5		28.2
Video games	7.3		2.3		6.5		9.6		6.1
Other	9.1		4.4		9.3		(5.6	)	10.0
Total	100.0	%	(5.7	)%	100.0	%	0.8	%	100.0	%



				Comparable						Comparable
	2006			Store Sales			2005			Store Sales			2004

Music		44.2	%		(14.0	)%		53.6	%		(9.2	)%		55.0	%
Home Video		37.6			1.2			30.0			(3.7	)		29.2
Video games		7.8			4.0			7.3			2.3			6.5
Other		10.4			7.9			9.1			4.4			9.3

Total		100.0	%		(6.2	)%		100.0	%		(5.7	)%		100.0	%


	•	Location and convenience: a strength of the Company is its convenient store locations that are often the exclusive retailer in centers offering a full complement of entertainment software;

	•	Marketing: the Company uses newspaper, radio and television advertising and in-store visual displays to market to consumers;

	•	Selection and assortment: the Company differentiates itself by maintaining a high in-stock position in a large assortment of product, particularly CDs and DVDs;

	•	Customer service: the Company believes it offers personalized customer service at its stores;

	•	Listening and Viewing Stations (“LVS”): the Company’s LVS is a sampling and selection tool designed to encourage customer purchases. The third generation of LVS (“LVS 3”) is currently installed in over 700 of the Company’s stores. LVS 3 enhances the customers’ in-store experience through improved product information displays and product search and suggestion capabilities;

	•	In-store CD burning and digital downloading: The Company has begun offering CD burning and digital downloading stations in selected stores and plans on expanding these capabilities to a greater number of stores in Fiscal 2007.


Year	No. of Leases	Year	No. of Leases

2007	395	2011	54

2008	173	2012	40

2009	141	2013	19

2010	87	2014 and beyond	82

Year	No. of Leases	Year	No. of Leases

2006	186	2010	69

2007	135	2011	39

2008	132	2012	31

2009	118	2013 and beyond	71

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Programs	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan
October 30, 2005 – November 26, 2005	226,100	$	6.63	226,100	434,541
November 27, 2005 – December 31, 2005	434,541	$	6.44	434,541	—
January 1, 2006 – January 28, 2006	—	—		—	—
Total	660,641	$	6.51	660,641	—

Plan Category	Number of Shares to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights	Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights		Number of Shares Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights)
	(Shares in thousands)
Equity Compensation Plan Approved by Shareholders	9,860	$	8.94	5,451
Equity Compensation Plans and Agreements not Approved by Shareholders	—	—		—


	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007

Trans World Entertainment Corporation	100	40	94	157	66	70
NASDAQ (U.S. Stocks)	100	69	107	107	121	130
NASDAQ Retail Trade Stocks	100	80	118	143	153	166

	Fiscal Year Ended
	January 28, 2006			January 29, 2005			January 31, 2004			February 1, 2003			February 2, 2002
	*($ in thousands, except per share and store data)*
*INCOME STATEMENT DATA:*
Sales	$	1, 238,486		$	1,365,133		$	1,330,626		$	1,281,869		$	1,388,032
Cost of sales	806,873			869,999			842,726			815,071			935,256
Gross profit	431,613			495,134			487,900			466,798			452,776
Selling, general and administrative expenses	426,854			450,162			459,441			465,893			422,737
Goodwill impairment charge (1)	—			—			—			40,914			—
Income (loss) from operations	4,759			44,972			28,459			(40,009		)	30,039
Interest expense	2,954			2,444			2,147			2,349			2,477
Other income	(2,171		)	(1,039		)	(718		)	(1,231		)	(2,120		)
Income (loss) before income taxes, extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	3,976			43,567			27,030			(41,127		)	29,682
Income tax expense (benefit)	1,090			4,892			8,302			(9,341		)	12,891
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	2,886			38,675			18,728			(31,786		)	16,791
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill , net of income taxes (2)	—			3,166			4,339			—			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of income taxes (3)(4)	(2,277		)	—			—			(13,684		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	2,922		$	41,841		$	23,067		$	(45,470	)	$	16,791
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.09		$	1.12		$	0.50		$	(0.79	)	$	0.40
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill	—			0.09			0.12			—			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	(0.07		)	—			—			(0.34		)	—
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.02		$	1.21		$	0.62		$	(1.13	)	$	0.40
Weighted average number of shares outstanding - basic	31,962			34,531			37,422			40,224			41,938
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Earnings (loss) per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	0.09		$	1.06		$	0.49		$	(0.79	)	$	0.39
Extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill	—			0.09			0.11			—			—
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	(0.07		)	—			—			(0.34		)	—
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.09		$	1.15		$	0.60		$	(1.13	)	$	0.39
Weighted average number of shares outstanding – diluted	32,124			36,297			38,209			40,224			42,553

Pro forma amounts assuming new accounting principle was applied retroactively:
Income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported	$	2,886		$	38,675		$	18,728		$	(31,786	)	$	16,791
Pro forma income before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	2,922			38,946			18,533			(32,115		)	17,283
Pro forma net income	2,922			42,112			22,872			(45,799		)	17,283
Per share amounts:
Basic earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported	$	0.09		$	1.12		$	0.50		$	(0.79	)	$	0.40
Pro forma basic earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.09		$	1.13		$	0.50		$	(0.80	)	$	0.41
Pro forma basic earnings per share	$	0.09		$	1.22		$	0.61		$	(1.14	)	$	0.41
Diluted earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, as reported	$	0.09		$	1.06		$	0.49		$	(0.79	)	$	0.39
Pro forma diluted earnings per share before extraordinary gain – unallocated negative goodwill and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.09		$	1.07		$	0.49		$	(0.80	)	$	0.40
Pro forma diluted earnings per share	$	0.09		$	1.16		$	0.60		$	(1.14	)	$	0.40

					2005 vs. 2004
*($ in thousands)*	2005		2004		$			%
Sales	$	1,238,486	$	1,365,133	$	(126,647	)	(9.3	)%

					Total Comparable
	2005		2004		Store Sales
	*($ in thousands)*
Music:
Compact discs	$	655,806	$	736,149	(8.5	)%
Audio cassettes and singles	7,906		14,463		(42.5	)
Total Music	663,712		750,612		(9.2	)
Video:
DVD	352,184		360,262		0.7
VHS	19,781		37,781		(45.5	)
Total Video	371,965		398,043		(3.7	)
Video games	90,408		89,297		2.3
Other	112,401		127,181		4.4
Total	$	1,238,486	$	1,365,133	(5.7	)%

					2004 vs. 2003
*($ in thousands)*	2004		2003		$		%
Sales	$	1,365,133	$	1,330,626	$	34,507	2.6	%

Contractual Obligation		2006		2007 - 2008		2009 - 2010		2011 and Beyond		Total
$	*in thousands*
Operating lease obligations		$	101,583	$	156,691	$	83,373	$	50,596	$	392,243
Capital lease obligations		5,195		9,539		7,418		9,356		31,508
Long-term debt (principal)		477		1,043		1,176		2,368		5,064
Long-term debt (interest)		291		491		358		257		1,397
Purchase obligations (1)		—		—		—		—		—
Deferred rent and other long-term liabilities (2)		1,637		9,797		1,649		1,550		14,633
Pension benefits		50		2,362		2,426		7,101		11,939
Total		$	109,233	$	179,923	$	96,400	$	71,228	$	456,784