Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

x(Mark One)

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

OR

oFor the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number 0-16244

For the transition period from              to              .

Commission file number 0-16244


VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware


11-2989601

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

 

11-2989601
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Terminal Drive

 

Terminal Drive
Plainview, New York


11803

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

 

11803
(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code code:

(516) 677-0200

Website: www.veeco.com

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock, par value $.01 per share

(Title of each class)
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

(Name of each exchange on which registered)
The NASDAQ Stock Market

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrantregistrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o  No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No   o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.files). Yes x  No   o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by references in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer xo

Accelerated filer ox

Non-accelerated filer o  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes x No

 

The aggregate market value of the votingcommon stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant,registrant at July 1, 2016 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter) was $655,733,038 based on the closing price of $16.38 on the common stockNASDAQ Stock Market on June 28, 2013 as reported on that date.

The Nasdaq National Market, was $1,376,219,104. Sharesnumber of shares of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

39,846,244on February 14, 2017 was 40,595,406 shares of common stock, were outstanding as of the close of business on February 18, 2014.par value $0.01 per share.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Certain portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be used in connection with the Registrant’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 



Table of Contents

 

Safe Harbor Statement

This annual report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Part I. Items 1, 3, 7 and 7A hereof, as well as within this Report generally. In addition, when used in this Report, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends”, “will” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:

·Our operating results have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by unfavorable market conditions;

·Timing of market adoption of light emitting diode (“LED”) technology for general lighting is uncertain;

·Our failure to successfully manage our outsourcing activities or failure of our outsourcing partners to perform as anticipated could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to adapt to fluctuating order volumes;

·The further reduction or elimination of foreign government subsidies and economic incentives may adversely affect the future order rate for our metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) equipment;

·Our operating results have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by tightening credit markets;

·Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification and such cancellation could result in decreased sales and increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed;

·Our failure to estimate customer demand accurately could result in excess or obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed, while manufacturing interruptions or delays could affect our ability to meet customer demand;

·The cyclicality of the industries we serve directly affects our business;

·We rely on a limited number of suppliers, some of whom are our sole source for particular components;

·Our sales to LED and data storage manufacturers are highly dependent on these manufacturers’ sales for consumer electronics applications, which can experience significant volatility due to seasonal and other factors, which could materially adversely impact our future results of operations;

·We are exposed to the risks of operating a global business, including the need to obtain export licenses for certain of our shipments and political risks in the countries we operate;

·We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and any determination that we violated these or similar laws could have a material adverse effect on our business;

·The timing of our orders, shipments, and revenue recognition may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly;

·We operate in industries characterized by rapid technological change;

·We face significant competition;

·We depend on a limited number of customers, located primarily in a limited number of regions, which operate in highly concentrated industries;

1



Table of Contents

·Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable;

·We are subject to internal control evaluations and attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any delays or difficulty in satisfying these requirements or negative reports concerning our internal controls could adversely affect our future results of operations and our stock price;

·The price of our common shares may be volatile and could decline significantly;

·Our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business;

·We are subject to foreign currency exchange risks;

·The enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights may be expensive and could divert our limited resources;

·We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement by others;

·If we are subject to cyber-attacks we could incur substantial costs and, if such attacks are successful, could result in significant liabilities, reputational harm and disruption of our operations;

·Our acquisition strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and integrating these businesses;

·We may be required to take additional impairment charges for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets or definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets;

·Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices may adversely affect our financial results;

·We are subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental, health and safety regulations;

·We have significant operations in locations which could be materially and adversely impacted in the event of a natural disaster or other significant disruption;

·We have adopted certain measures that may have anti-takeover effects which may make an acquisition of our Company by another company more difficult;

·New regulations related to conflict minerals will force us to incur additional expenses, may make our supply chain more complex, and may result in damage to our relationships with customers; and

·The matters set forth in this Report generally, including the risk factors set forth in “Part I. Item 1A. Risk Factors.”

Consequently, such forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as the current plans, estimates and beliefs of Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Veeco”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our”, unless the context indicates otherwise). The Company does not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

2



Table of Contents

 

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

 

INDEX

 

Safe Harbor StatementPART I

1

PART I.

43

 

 

Item 1. Business

43

Item 1A. Risk Factors

109

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

2224

Item 2. Properties

2224

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

2324

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

2324

 

 

PART II

2425

 

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2425

Stock Performance Graph

26

Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

2627

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

27

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

40

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

4840

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

4840

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

4840

Item 9B. Other Information

5143

 

 

PART III

5143

 

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

5143

Item 11. Executive Compensation

5143

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

5143

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

5243

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

5243

 

 

PART IV

5344

 

 

Item 15. Exhibits, and Financial Statements and ScheduleStatement Schedules

5344

 

 

SIGNATURES

56

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

57

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

F-147

3



TableThis Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Form 10-K”) contains certain forward-looking information relating to Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Veeco,” the “Company,” “Registrant,” “we,” “our,” or “us,” unless the context indicates otherwise) that is based on the beliefs of, Contentsand assumptions made by, our management as well as information currently available to management. When used in this Form 10-K, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates,” “targets,” “plans,” “intends,” “will,” and similar expressions relating to the future are intended to identify forward-looking information. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Part I. Items 1, 3, 7 and 7A hereof, as well as within this Form 10-K generally. This forward-looking information reflects our current views with respect to future events and is subject to certain risks, uncertainties, and assumptions, including with respect to our pending acquisition of Ultratech, some of which are described under the caption “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A, and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties occur, or should our assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from the forward-looking information described in this Form 10-K as believed, anticipated, expected, estimated, targeted, planned, or similarly identified. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

 

PART I.I

 

Item 1. Business

 

The Company

Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Veeco”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our”, unless the context indicates otherwise) createsWe create process equipment that enables technologies for a cleaner and more productive world. We design, develop, manufacture, market, and marketsupport thin film equipment aligned withto meet the demands of key global “megatrends”trends such as improving energy efficiency, enhancing mobility, and mobility.increasing connectivity. Our equipment is primarily soldused to make electronic devices which enable these trends, including light emitting diodes (“LED”s)LEDs”), flexible organic LED (OLED) displays, hard-diskmicro-electromechanical systems (“MEMS”), wireless devices, power electronics, hard disk drives solar cells, power semiconductors(“HDDs”), and wireless components.semiconductor devices. Our products are sold to semiconductor and advanced packaging device manufacturers, and we may also license our technology to our customers or partners.

 

We develop highly differentiated, “best-in-class” process equipment for critical performance steps.steps in thin film processing. Our products featureprovide leading technology at low cost-of-ownership and high throughput.cost-of-ownership. Core competencies in advanced thin film technologies over 300 patents, and decades of specialized process know-how helpshelp us to stay at the forefront of these demandingrapidly advancing industries.

 

Our LED & Solar segment includes two related compound semiconductor technologies, metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) and molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) as well as newly acquired atomic layer deposition (“ALD”) technology. Our MOCVD and MBE systems and components enable the manufacture of LEDs usedHeadquartered in consumer electronics, displays and lighting, power semiconductors, wireless components and solar cells. Our ALD technology is used by the manufacturers of OLED displays and has further applications in the semiconductor and solar markets.

Our Data Storage segment designs and manufactures systems used to create thin film magnetic heads (“TFMH”s) that read and write data on hard disk drives. These include ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and slicing, dicing and lapping systems. While our systems are primarily sold to hard drive customers, they also have applications in optical coatings, micro-electro-mechanical systems (“MEMS”) and magnetic sensors, and extreme ultraviolet (“EUV”) lithography.

As of December 31, 2013,Plainview, New York, we had approximately 800 employees to support our customers through product and process development, training, manufacturing, and sales and service sites in the U.S., South Korea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europe and other locations.

Veeco Instruments Inc. waswere organized as a Delaware corporation in 1989. We have sales and service operations across the Asia-Pacific region, Europe, and North America to address our customers’ needs.

 

Our Growth StrategyRecent Developments

 

Our growth strategy consists of:On February 2, 2017, Veeco and Ultratech, Inc. (“Ultratech”), a leading supplier of lithography, laser-processing, and inspection systems used to manufacture semiconductor devices and LEDs, signed a definitive agreement for Veeco to acquire Ultratech. The Boards of Directors of both Veeco and Ultratech have unanimously approved the transaction.

Ultratech shareholders will receive (i) $21.75 per share in cash and (ii) 0.2675 of a share of Veeco common stock for each Ultratech common share outstanding. Based on Veeco’s closing stock price on February 1, 2017, the transaction consideration is valued at approximately $28.64 per Ultratech share. The implied total transaction value is approximately $815 million and the implied enterprise value is approximately $550 million, net of Ultratech’s net cash balance as of December 31, 2016. The transaction is expected to close in the second calendar quarter of 2017, subject to approval by Ultratech shareholders, regulatory approvals in the United States, and other customary closing conditions.

Business Overview

We are focused on:

 

·          Providing differentiated process equipment to address customers’ current production requirements and next generation product development roadmaps;

 

·          Investing to win through focused research and development spending in markets that we believe provide significant growth opportunities or are at an inflection point in process equipment requirements. Examples includerequirements, including LED, OLED, and power semiconductor devices;devices, and advanced packaging technologies;

·         Leveraging our world-class sales channel and local process applications support teams to build strong strategic relationships with technology leaders;

 

·         Expanding our portfolio of service products thatto improve the performance of our systems, including spare parts, upgrades, and consumables to drive growth, reduce our customers’ cost of ownership, and improve customer satisfaction;

 

·         CombiningCross-selling our product portfolio across our broad customer base and end markets to both maximize sales opportunities and diversify our business;

·Utilizing a combination of outsourced and internal manufacturing strategies to flex manufacturing capacity through industry investment cycles;cycles without compromising quality or performance; and

 

·         Pursuing partnerships and acquisitions to expand our product portfolio into new and accelerate ouradjacent markets to drive sales growth.

 

4



Table of Contents

Business Overview and Industry TrendsMarkets

 

Business Overview:Our deposition, etch and other systems are applicable toused in the creation of a broad range of microelectronic components, including LEDs, OLEDs, TFMHsMEMS, radio frequency (“RF”) filters, power semiconductors, thin film magnetic heads (“TFMHs”), and compoundother semiconductor devices. Our customers who manufacture these devices invest in equipment in orderour systems to advance theirdevelop next generation products and deliver more efficient, and cost effective, technologyand advanced technological solutions. Our businesses tend to beWe operate in a cyclical business environment, and are highly influenced by customerour customers’ buying patterns that are dependent upon industry trends. While ourOur products are sold tointo multiple end markets, we are focused hereinand the following discussion focuses on the trends that most influence our business.business within each of those markets.

 

Lighting, Display & Power Electronics

LED Industry Trends: Followingtechnology has existed for more than 50 years; however, commercial adoption of LEDs was limited to niche applications until the global recession in 2008-2009, we experiencedmost recent decade. In the early 1990’s, researchers developed a rapid improvement in business conditions in late 2009 through mid-2011, particularly in our MOCVD business.  Demand for our MOCVD equipment increased dramatically, primarily from customers in South Korea, China, and Taiwan, as LEDs became the standard illumination for TV backlighting. We experiencedprocess utilizing Gallium Nitride (“GaN”) that created a strong increase in demand for MOCVD from customers in China duelow cost blue LED to government funding of LED fabrication facility expansions throughout the region. Following this large investment,produce white light. With that breakthrough, the LED industry entered an overcapacity situation, evidenced by low tool utilization rates being reported by many key global customers.  As a result, our MOCVD business declined significantly fromstarted, and the middlenumber of 2011 through the end of 2013. While utilization rates of our equipment in many customer facilities improved in 2013 from prior trough levels in 2012, weak business conditions in MOCVD persist and continueapplications for LEDs began to be difficult at the start of 2014.  In the short term, it is difficult for us to predict when the supply/demand of MOCVD equipment will return to equilibrium and when order rates for our MOCVD products will meaningfully recover.expand.

 

While consumer electronics (e.g. cell phones, laptops, LED-TVs) have beenSince that time, the dominant end markets forLED industry has experienced multiple growth cycles brought on by the adoption of LED technology overfor consumer and commercial applications. The first wave of LED growth was driven by mobile phones, which implemented the past decade, anduse of LED technology for which mostdisplay backlighting. The LED industry experienced its second period of the new MOCVD capacity was installed, these applications are expected to reach saturation in the next few years.  Conversely, the general lighting market is in its infancy, and we believe that thousands of additional MOCVD tools will be requiredrapid growth as LEDs become widelywere adopted for this much larger market application.

As partTV display backlighting. More recently, the adoption of the shift toward more efficient energy use across the globe, we believeLEDs for solid state lighting has given rise to a third wave of demand. LED technology will play a key role inoffers energy and cost savings opportunities in lighting.lighting, which align with the global shift toward energy efficiency initiatives.

Our metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) technology is at the core of the manufacturing process for GaN-based LEDs. We see this opportunityhave benefited with each growth cycle, as both vastLED producers invest in MOCVD process equipment to capture share in these markets. Demand for our equipment has historically been cyclical in nature, influenced by multiple factors, including: macroeconomic conditions; prices for LED chips; supply and long-term given thatdemand dynamics; and our customers’ manufacturing plans. However, we expect the ongoing adoption of LED lighting to drive the need for additional MOCVD capacity over the next several years.

MOCVD technology is just now beginning to penetrate the global lighting market. LED adoption is happening initially in outdoor, commercial and industrial lighting where high usage and lower efficiency make incumbent lighting costly. Further adoption across all forms of lighting is expected to occurequally important in the coming years with rapidly declining LED costs, shortening payback periods versus conventionalmanufacturing of red, orange, and yellow (“ROY”) LEDs, which are used increasingly for fine-pitch digital signage and automotive lighting technologies, and “ban-the-bulb” legislation now underway in more than 20 countries around the globe. In addition to the incandescent bulb phase-outs, many countries are implementing policies to accelerate adoption of LEDs. These include China’s “10 cities 10,000 lights” program, South Korea’s “20-60” plan targeting 60% penetration of lighting on a national level by 2020, and Japan’s “Basic Energy Plan” with specific goals for energy efficient lighting. In March 2013, LED industry forecasters at Digitimes Research projected that LED lighting will represent about 38.6% of the total lighting market, and will be worth approximately $44.2 billion by 2015.

In order to capitalize on this opportunity, we introduced several new generations of MOCVD tools, including our TurboDisc® K-Series™ and MaxBright® MOCVD systems which provide customers with significant cost of ownership advantages when compared with alternative equipment.  These activities enabled us to overtake our primary competitor in market share in 2012. To maintain our leadership position, we continue to invest heavily in MOCVD research and development to help drive down cost of LED manufacturing for our customers in order to accelerate lighting adoption.

Trends in other Markets Impactingapplications. For these applications, our MOCVD Business:  Power semiconductors are an emergingtechnology is used to deposit highly uniform Arsenic Phosphide (“AsP”) films which create amber and red hues. AsP MOCVD technology is also used to produce multiple other devices including infrared LEDs and vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers (“VCSELS”) used for optical data communication. While the market opportunity for AsP MOCVD equipment.  technology is smaller than the GaN MOCVD market for blue LEDs, we expect to also benefit from growth driven by increased adoption of LED technology for automobiles, outdoor display, signage, and other applications.

Our MOCVD technologies are also crucial in the manufacturing of GaN-on-Silicon based power electronic devices. Global demand is increasing for advanced power electronics with greater energy efficiency, smaller footprints, higher operating temperatures, faster switching capabilities, and greater reliability. These devices support many needs, including

more efficient IT servers, electrical motors, electric vehicles, wind turbines, and photovoltaic power inverters.

While silicon-based transistors are the mainstream ofwidely used in power electronic devices today, gallium nitride (“GaN”)-on-SiliconGaN-on-Silicon based power electronics developed on MOCVD tools can potentially deliver higher performance (i.e.(e.g., smaller power supply form factors, higher efficiency, and faster switching speed)speeds). GlobalIn recent years, global industry leaders in power electronics are currently workinghave focused on research and development (“R&D”) programs to explorecommercialize this new technology. GaN-on-Silicon based powerDevice manufacturers will likely begin to transition from development to production of these devices have potential for information technology and consumer devices (e.g. power supplies, inverters).over the next couple of years; we can benefit from this transition as our customers invest in process equipment to support this production ramp-up.

 

Another application for In addition to depositing the critical GaN layer with our MOCVD is in the solar market. MOCVD equipment can also be usedproducts, our Precision Surface Processing (“PSP”) products address multiple etch and clean steps required to manufacture high-efficiency triple junction photovoltaic cells. We currently sell a small number of MOCVD systems each year to make solar cells for Concentrator Photovoltaic (CPV)these advanced power electronics and Space Based applications.

5



Table of ContentsLED devices.

 

Trends ImpactingAdvanced Packaging, MEMS & RF

Advanced Packaging includes a portfolio of wafer-level assembly technologies that enable the miniaturization and performance improvement of electronic products, such as smartphones, smartwatches, and other mobile applications. As process steps such as wet etch and cleans in Advanced Packaging have become increasingly more challenging, our MBE Business:  Our MBE systems, sourcesPSP products have been gaining traction in this growing market segment. Demand for higher performance, increased functionality, smaller form factors, and componentslower power consumption in mobile devices, consumer electronics, and high performance computing is driving the adoption of advanced packaging technology. Independent Device Manufacturers (“IDMs”) and Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test (“OSAT”) companies are implementing multiple advanced packaging approaches including Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging (“FO-WLP”), recently deployed in high-volume manufacturing and Through Silicon Via (“TSV”) to enable stacked memory, 2.5D, and 3D packaging devices.

MEMS devices are used to manufacture critical epitaxial layers in applications such as solar cells, fiber-optics, mobile phones, radar systems and displays. Our business is primarily influenced by long-term market trends in cell phone manufacturing. Each one of these complex cell phone devices containsfor an increasing number of power amplifiers or other compound semiconductor radio frequency components. Due to industry consolidationapplications, including accelerometers for automobile airbags, pressure sensors for medical uses, and resulting overcapacity, our salesgyroscopes for a variety of MBE production tools haveconsumer products, such as gaming consoles and mobile devices. One of the fastest growing MEMS applications has been declining for about a year. In 2013, we refocused our business and product portfolio to increase our market share in sales of MBE systems to scientific research organizations and universities.

Trends Impacting our ALD Business:  On October 1, 2013, we completed the acquisition of Synos Technology, Inc.(“Synos”), which brought atomic layer deposition technology to us. We are working with the world leader in mobile OLED displays to develop ALD systems that effectively encapsulate the OLED materials and potentially enable flexible displaysRF filters for mobile phones. Accordingdevices, driven by increasingly complex wireless standards, the exponential growth of mobile data, and carrier aggregation. In order to industry forecasting firm IHS iSuppli,address these growing demands, the flexible OLED display marketnumber of discrete RF filters in an average smartphone is expected to growdouble from $21 million in 201350 to almost $12 billion100 by 2020. In addition, we also see numerous extended opportunitiesThese trends are positive for ALDus, particularly for our PSP products, where our technology in OLED TV, lighting, semiconductor, solaris enabling some of the most challenging process steps, as well as our ion beam etch and other adjacent markets.Molecular Beam Epitaxy (“MBE”) products, which are used to create Bulk Acoustic Wave (“BAW”) and Surface Acoustic Wave (“SAW”) RF filters.

 

Data Storage Business Overview and Trends:  Worldwide

The Data Storage market involves the storage demand continues to increase.of data in electromagnetic or other forms for use by a computer or other devices, including HDDs used in large capacity storage applications. While hard disk drives (“HDDs”)HDDs face significant competition from flash memory, we believe that HDDs will continue to provide the bestsignificant value for mass storage and will remain at the forefront of large capacity storage applications. According toThis is especially true for data center applications where large volumes of data storage research firm TrendFocus’ August 2013 report, shipmentsare required to serve an increasingly mobile population. The HDD manufacturing industry continues to optimize its existing manufacturing capacity to address demand. As a result, we expect future sales to be focused on implementation of TFMHs,new technologies as opposed to capacity expansion. Future demand for our data storage systems is unclear and sales are expected to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Our process knowledge and magnetic materials expertise from the HDD component that our equipment makes, are forecasted to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 4.2% from 2013 to 2017.Data Storage market positions us well for certain front-end semiconductor and MEMS opportunities, as thin film magnetic manufacturing methods become increasingly used in these markets.

 

While technological change continuesScientific & Industrial

The Scientific and Industrial markets include advanced materials research and a broad range of manufacturing applications including high-power fiber lasers, infrared detectors, optical coatings, and extreme ultraviolet (“EUV”) photomasks blanks.

Our MBE systems are used by scientific research organizations and universities to drive new discoveries in data storage, the industry has gone throughareas of materials science. MBE enables precise epitaxial crystal growth for a periodwide variety of maturation, including vertical integrationmaterials, which supports the

development of new performance materials used for emerging technologies. MBE technology is also used in the manufacturing of products such as high-power lasers and consolidation. A recovery in capital spending by our key data storage customers in 2010, combined with the successful introduction of several new depositioninfrared sensors. Our tools to advance areal density, enabled us to report revenue growth in both 2010 and 2011. Natural disasters in Japan (tsunami) and Thailand (floods) caused major disruptionscreate highly uniform Gallium-Arsenide (“GaAs”) or Indium-Phosphide (“InPh”) film layers, which are critical to the HDD supply chain in 2011. The floods in Thailand resulted in an unexpected increase in equipment orders for us in the fourth quarterperformance of 2011 as customers rebuilt lost capacity. This ledthese devices. Our PSP products are also used to record levels of Data Storage revenue in the first half of 2012. However, this significant equipment investment, combined with industry consolidation and a slowdown in hard drive unit demand in mid-2012 due to weak global economic conditions, caused our hard drive customers to freeze capacity additions. So, for the full year of 2012, our Data Storage revenue was flat and orders were well below recent historical averages.  Industry overcapacity and weak order rates continued into 2013 and it is unclear when hard drive manufacturers will need to make significant investments in new equipment capacity.manufacture infrared sensors.

 

ThroughoutOur Ion Beam Deposition (“IBD”) tools are used to produce high quality optical films for multiple applications including laser mirrors, optical filters, and anti-reflective coatings. Our tools deposit thin layers of advanced materials on various substrates to alter how light is reflected and transmitted. Our ability to precisely deposit high quality films with extremely low particulate levels make our ion beam deposition technology ideal for manufacturing defect-free EUV photomask blanks. The front-end semiconductor industry cycles, we continueis expected to invest in developing systemsadopt EUV lithography to support advanced technologies such as heat assisted magnetic recording (“HAMR”). HAMR is a technology that magnetically records datameet future device requirements. Future growth will depend on high-stability media using laser thermal assistance to first heat the material. HAMR takes advantageoverall adoption of high-stability magnetic compounds that can store single bits in a much smaller area than in current hard driveEUV technology.

 

Our Data Storage systems are also sold for applications in MEMS magnetic sensors, optical coatings and EUV photomasks. We have put in place new product development, marketing and sales strategies to grow the non-data storage applications for our technologies.

We have two segments, LED & Solar and Data Storage. Net sales for these segments are illustrated in the following table (dollars in thousands):

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of

 

 

 

Percent of

 

 

 

Percent of

 

 

 

2013

 

total

 

2012

 

total

 

2011

 

total

 

Segment Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

$

249,742

 

75.3

%

$

363,181

 

70.4

%

$

827,797

 

84.5

%

Data Storage

 

82,007

 

24.7

%

152,839

 

29.6

%

151,338

 

15.5

%

Total

 

$

331,749

 

100.0

%

$

516,020

 

100.0

%

$

979,135

 

100.0

%

Please see our footnote Foreign Operations, Geographic Area and Product Segment Information in our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding our segments and sales by geographic location.

6



Table of Contents

LED & SolarSystem products

 

Metal Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition Systems (“MOCVD”):

We are the world’s leading supplier of MOCVD technology.systems. MOCVD production systems are used to make GaN-based devices (blue(such as blue and green LEDs) and AsP-based devices (red, orange and yellow(such as ROY LEDs), which are used today in television and laptopcomputer display backlighting, general illumination, large area signage, specialty illumination, power electronics, and many other applications. Our AsPTurboDisc® EPIK®700 GaN MOCVD systems also are used to make high-efficiency triple junction photo cells. In 2011, we introducedsystem combines the industry’s first production-proven multi-chamber MOCVD system, the MaxBright,highest productivity and best-in-class yields with low cost of ownership, further enabling lower manufacturing costs for high-volume production of LEDs. We sell MOCVD systems in either single or multi-chamber configurations.LED applications. In 2012,2016, we introduced the TurboDisc MaxBright M & MHPK475i AsP MOCVD system, which offers best-in-class productivity and K465i HP GaNyields for ROY LEDs, infra-red LEDs, and high-efficiency triple junction photovoltaic solar cell applications. Our Propel PowerGaN MOCVD systems,System (“Propel”) enables the development of highly-efficient GaN-based power electronic devices that have the potential to accelerate the industry’s highest productivity, highest footprint efficiency platformstransition from research and development to high volume production. The Propel system offers 200mm technology and incorporates single-wafer reactor technology for LED manufacturing.outstanding film uniformity, yield, and device performance.

 

Precision Surface Processing Systems

Our Precision Surface Processing systems offer single wafer wet etch, clean, and surface preparation solutions which target high growth segments in advanced packaging, MEMS, LEDs, and compound semiconductor markets. The WaferStorm® platform is based on PSP’s unique ImmJET technology, which provides improved performance at a lower cost of ownership than conventional wet bench-only or spray-only approaches. This highly flexible platform targets solvent based cleaning applications that require a significant level of process control and flexibility. The WaferEtch® platform provides highly uniform, selective etching with onboard end point detection for improved process control and yield in bumping applications. In addition, PSP has developed a state-of-the-art solution with the WaferEtch platform to address the requirements of TSV reveal, in which the backside of a wafer is thinned to reveal the copper interconnects. PSP’s TSV technology offers a significant cost of ownership reduction compared with dry etch processing by replacing up to four separate process steps.

Ion Beam Etch and Deposition Systems

Our NEXUS® IBD systems utilize ion beam technology to deposit precise layers of thin films. IBD systems deposit high purity thin film layers and provide excellent uniformity and repeatability. Our NEXUS Ion Beam Etch (“IBE”) systems utilize a charged particle beam consisting of ions to etch precise, complex features. The NEXUS systems may be included on our cluster system platform to allow either parallel or sequential deposition/etch processes. These systems are used primarily by data storage and telecommunications device manufacturers in the fabrication of discrete and integrated microelectronic devices.

We also provide a broad array of ion beam sources. These technologies are applicable in the HDD industry as well as for optical coatings and other end markets. Our SPECTOR® Ion Beam Sputtering system was developed for high precision coatings and offers manufacturers state of the art optical thickness monitoring, improved productivity, and target material utilization, for cutting-edge optical interference coating applications.

Molecular Beam Epitaxy Systems (“MBE”):

MBE is the process of precisely depositing epitaxially aligned atomically thin crystalepitaxially-aligned atomically-thin crystalline layers, or epilayers, of elemental materials onto a substrate in an ultra-high vacuum environment. We are the leading supplier of MBE systems worldwide. Our MBE systems, sources, and components are used to develop and manufacture critical epitaxial layers in a wide variety of applications such as solar cells, high-power fiber lasers, infrared detectors, mobile phones, radar systems, and displays. For many compound semiconductors, MBE is the critical first step of the fabrication process, ultimately determining device functionality and performance. We provide MBE systems and components for the production of wireless devices (e.g., power amplifiers, high electron mobility transistors, or hetero-junction bipolar transistors) and a broad array of research applications for new compound semiconductor materials research applications.  In 2013, we introduced the GENxplor™,materials. Our GENxplor® R&D MBE System is the industry’s first fully-integrated MBE system for the compound semiconductor R&Dresearch and development market. The GENxplor MBE system creates high quality epitaxial layers on substrates up to 3” in diameter and is ideal for cutting edgecutting-edge research on a wide variety of materials including gallium arsenide, nitrides, and oxides. Our GEN2000

Fast Array Scanning Atomic Layer Deposition Systems (“FAST-ALD”®):  FAST-ALD™ represents a paradigm shift in a technology long known and GEN200® production MBE systems continue to set standards for excellent deposition uniformity and pin-hole free films. While traditional ALD is slow, costly and limited to “chamber-sized” reactors, FAST-ALD can deposit materials below 100º Celsius and 10 times faster, making it capablevolume production of deposition on substrates with virtually no size limitation. Our patented linear reactor allows the chemical reaction to occur at the substrate’s surface. We are primarily focused on applying this technology for the encapsulation of organic light emitting diode (OLED) materials used to enable flexible mobile devices and we are also exploring additional applications in solar,MBE-based compound semiconductor and other end markets.

Data Storage

Ion Beam Deposition (“IBD”) Systems:  Our IBD systems and NEXUS® IBD systems utilize ion beam technology to deposit precise layers of thin films. The NEXUS systems may be included on our cluster system platform to allow either parallel or sequential etch/deposition processes. IBD systems deposit high purity thin film layers and provide maximum uniformity and repeatability. In addition to IBD systems, we provide a broad array of ion beam sources. These technologies are applicable in the hard drive industry as well as for optical coatings and other end markets.

Ion Beam Etch (“IBE”) Systems:  Our NEXUS IBE systems etch precise, complex features for use primarily by data storage and telecommunications device manufacturers in the fabrication of discrete and integrated microelectronic devices.

 

Other Deposition and Industrial Products

We make a broad array of deposition systems including Physical Vapor Deposition, (“PVD”) Systems: Our NEXUS PVD systems offer manufacturers a highly flexible deposition platform for developing next-generation data storage applications.

Diamond-Like Carbon (“DLC”) Deposition, Systems: Our DLC deposition systems deposit protective coatings on advanced TFMHs.

and Chemical Vapor Deposition (“CVD”) Systems: Systems. In addition, our Optium Our NEXUS CVD systems deposit conformal films for advanced TFMH applications.®

Precision Lapping, Slicing, and Dicing Systems:  Our Optium® products generally are used in “back-end” applications in a data storage fabrication facilityfacilities where TFMHs or “sliders” are fabricated. This equipment includes lapping tools, which enable precise material removal within three nanometers, which is necessary for next generationadvanced TFMHs. We also manufacture tools that slice and dice wafers into rowbarsrow bars and TFMHs.

 

Optical Coatings: Our SPECTOR offers manufacturers improvements in target material utilization, optical endpoint controlSales and process time for cutting-edge optical interference coating applications.

7



Table of Contents

Service and Sales

 

We sell our products and services worldwide primarily through various strategically located sales and service facilities in the U.S.,United States, Europe, and Asia Pacific, and wethe Asia-Pacific region. We believe that our customer service organization is a significant factor in our success. In 2010 and 2011, we significantly expanded our footprint in Asia to bring training, technology support and R&D closer to our customers through new sites in China, Taiwan and South Korea. We provide service and support on a warranty, service contract, orand an individual service-call basis. We believe that offering timely support creates stronger relationships with customers and provides us with a significant competitive advantage. RevenuesRevenue from the salesales of parts, upgrades, service, and support represented approximately 29%28%, 21%22%, and 9%25% of our net sales for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively. Parts and consumablesupgrade sales represented approximately 23%21%, 17%18%, and 7%21% of our net sales for those years, respectively, and service and support sales were 6%, 4%, and 2%,4% respectively.

 

Customers

 

We sell our products to many of the world’s major LED, solarMEMS, OSAT, HDD and hard drivesemiconductor manufacturers, as well as to customers in other industries, research centers and universities. We rely on certain principal customers for a significant portion of our sales. Sales to HC SemiTek in our LED & Solar segmentOSRAM Opto Semiconductors accounted for more than 10% of our total net sales in 2013, Western Digital in our Data Storage segment accounted for more than 10% of our total net2016; sales in 2012,to San’an Optoelectronics Co. and Elec-Tech InternationalKAISTAR Lighting (Xiamen) Co. Ltd. and Sanan Optoelectronics in our LED & Solar segment each accounted for more than 10% of our total net sales in 2011.2015; sales to HC SemiTek Corp. and Seoul Viosys Co. each accounted for more than 10% of our total net sales in 2014. If any principal customer discontinues its relationship with us or suffers economic difficulties, our business prospects, financial condition, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

 

Research and Development and Marketing

 

Our marketing, research and development functions are organized by business unit.focused on the timely creation of new products and enhancements to existing products, both of which are necessary to maintain our competitive position. We believe that this organizational structure allows each business unit managercollaborate with our customers to more closely monitor the products for which they are responsible, resulting in more efficient marketingalign our technology and research and development.product roadmaps to customer requirements. Our research and development activities take place at our facilities in St. Paul, Minnesota; Somerset, New Jersey; Plainview, New York; Poughkeepsie, New York; Camarillo, California; Ft. Collins, Colorado; Somerset, New Jersey; St. Paul, Minnesota; Fremont, California; and South Korea.

We believe that continued and timely development of new products and enhancements to existing products are necessary to maintain our competitive position. We work collaboratively with our customers to help ensure our technology and product roadmaps are aligned with customer requirements.Horsham, Pennsylvania.

 

Our research and development expenses were approximately $81.4$81.0 million, $95.2$78.5 million, and $96.6$81.2 million, or approximately 25%24%, 18%16%, and 10%21% of net sales for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively. These expenses consisted primarily of salaries, project materials, and other product development and enhancement costs.

Suppliers

 

We currently outsource certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially allmanufacturing of our new MOCVD systems, Data Storage systems and ion sources. Wesystems. While we primarily rely on several suppliersone supplier for the manufacturing of these systems, we maintain a minimum level of internal manufacturing capability for these systems. In addition, certainRefer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for a description of the componentsrisks associated with our reliance on suppliers and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers.

8



Table of Contentsoutsourcing partners.

 

Backlog

 

Our backlog consists of orders for which we received a firm purchase order, a customer-confirmed shipment date within twelve months, and a deposit wherewhen required.

Our backlog decreasedincreased to $143.3$209.2 million as ofat December 31, 20132016 from $150.2$186.0 million as ofat December 31, 2012.2015. During the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, we recorded backlog adjustments of approximately $6.8$17.9 million consistingprimarily related to a partial cancellation of a $5.6 million adjustment related to orders that no longer met our bookings criteria as well as an adjustment related to foreign currency translation of $1.2 million.prior period customer order.

 

Competition

 

In each of the markets that we serve, we face substantial competition from established competitors, some of which have greater financial, engineering, and marketing resources than us,we do, as well as from smaller competitors. In addition, many of our products face competition from alternative technologies, some of which are more established than those used in our products. Significant factors for customer selection of our tools include system performance, accuracy, repeatability, ease of use, reliability, cost of ownership, and technical service and support. We believe that we are competitive based on the customer selection factors in each market we serve. None of our competitors compete with us across all of our product lines.

 

Some of ourOur competitors include, but are not limited to:include: Aixtron; Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment (AMEC); Applied Materials; Canon AnelvaAnelva; DCA Instruments; Grand Plastics Technology Corporation; Lam Research; Leybold Optics; Oerlikon Balzers;Mantis Deposition Systems; MBE Komponenten; Oerlikon; Methode Electronics; Orbotech; Oxford Instruments; ToyoRiber; Scientech; Taiyo Nippon Sanso; and Riber.Tang Optoelectronics Equipment Company (TOPEC).

 

Intellectual Property

 

Our success depends in part on our proprietary technology. Althoughtechnology, and we attempt to protect our intellectual property rights throughhave over 300 patents copyrights, trade secretsin the United States and other measures, there can be no assurance that we will be able to protect our technology adequately or that competitors will not be able to develop similar technology independently.countries and have additional applications pending for new inventions.

 

We have patents and exclusive and non-exclusive licenses to patents owned by others covering certain of our products, which we believe provide us with a competitive advantage. We have a policy of seeking patents on inventions concerning new products and improvements as part of our ongoing research, development, and manufacturing activities. We believe that there is no single patent or exclusive or non-exclusive license to patents owned by others that is critical to our operations, as the success of our business depends primarily on the technical expertise, innovation, customer satisfaction, and experience of our employees.

 

We also rely upon trade secret protectionRefer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for our confidential and propriety information. There can be no assurance that others will not independently develop substantially equivalent proprietary information and techniques or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets. In addition, we cannot be certain that we will not be sued by third parties alleging that we have infringed their patents or othera description of risks associated with intellectual property rights. If any third party sues us, our business, results of operations or financial condition could be materially adversely affected.property.

 

Employees

 

As ofAt December 31, 2013,2016 we had approximately 800716 employees, of which there were approximately 160230 in manufacturing and testing, 9075 in sales and marketing, 160111 in service and product support, 260169 in engineering and research and development, and 130131 in information technology, general administration, and finance. In addition, we had approximately 10 temporary employees/outside contractors in support of our variable cost strategy. The success of our future operations depends in large part on our ability to recruit and retain engineers, technicians, and other highly-skilledhighly skilled professionals who are in considerable demand. We feel that we have adequate programs in place to attract, motivate, and retain our employees. We plan to monitor industry practices to make sure that our compensation and employee benefits remain competitive. However, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in recruiting or retaining key personnel. We believe that our employee relations with our employees are good. Refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for a description of risks associated with employee retention and recruitment.

Financial Information About Segments and Geographic Areas

 

9



TableWe operate as a single reportable segment and report our financial results in four geographic regions: the United States; China; Europe, Middle East, and Africa (“EMEA”); and Rest of ContentsWorld (“ROW”). Refer to Note 18, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for financial data pertaining to our geographic operations. Refer to Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for a description of risks relating to our geographic operations.

 

Available Information

 

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other informationOur corporate website address is www.veeco.com. All filings we make with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”(“SEC”). The public may obtain information by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is www.sec.gov.

Internet Address

We maintain a website where additional information concerning our business and various upcoming events can be found. The address of our website is www.veeco.com. We provide a link on our website, under Investors—Financial—SEC Filings, through which investors can access our filings with the SEC,, including our filed annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-K, filed quarterly reportsour Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, current reportsour Current Reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statements and allany amendments thereto filed or furnished pursuant to those reports. These filingsSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are posted toavailable for free in the Investor Relations section of our website as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such materialthey are filed with or furnished to the SEC. Our SEC filings are available to be read or copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information about the operation of the Public Reference Room can be obtained by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Our filings can also be obtained for free on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The reference to our website address does not constitute inclusion or incorporation by reference of the information contained on our website in this Form 10-K or other filings with the SEC.SEC, and the information contained on our website is not part of this document.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

Key Risk Factors That May Impact Future Results

 

In addition toStockholders should consider carefully the other information set forth herein, the following risk factors should be carefully considered by shareholdersdescribed below. Any of these factors, many of which are beyond our control, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, operating results, cash flow, and potential investors in the Company.stock price.

 

OurUnfavorable market conditions may adversely affect our operating results have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by unfavorable market conditions.results.

 

Market conditions relative toConditions of the segmentsmarkets in which we operate are volatile and have deteriorated significantly in many of the countries and regions in which we do business and may remain or become further depressed for the foreseeable future. Our MOCVD order volumes decreased significantly in the latter part of 2011, remained depressed through 2012 and 2013, and may continue to remain at low levels. Foreign government incentives designed to encourage the development of the LED industry have been curtailed, and the demand for our MOCVD products has softened.future. We have experienced and may continue to experience customer rescheduling and, to a lesser extent, cancellations of orders for our products. Continuing adverseAdverse market conditions relative to our products would negatively impact our business, and could result in:

 

·      further reduced demand for our products;

 

·      further rescheduling and cancellations of orders for our products, resulting in negative backlog adjustments;

 

·      increased price competition andleading to lower margin for our products;

 

·      increased competition from sellers of used equipment or lower-priced alternatives to our products;

 

·      increased risk of excess and obsolete inventories;inventory obsolescence;

 

·      increased risk in the collectability ofuncollectable amounts due from our customers;

·increased riskcustomers resulting in potentialincreased reserves for doubtful accounts and write-offs of accounts receivable;

 

·      disruptions in our supply chain as we reduce our purchasing volumes and limit our contract manufacturing operations; and

 

·      higher operating costs as a percentage of revenues.

 

If the markets in which we participate continuefail to experience a slow recovery or an additional down turn,experience a further downturn, this could have a further negative impact on our sales and revenue generation, margins and operating expenses, and profitability.

A reduction or elimination of foreign government subsidies and economic incentives may adversely affect the future order rate for our MOCVD equipment.

We generate a significant portion of our revenue in China. In recent years, the Chinese government has provided various incentives to encourage development of the LED industry, including subsidizing a significant portion of the purchase cost of MOCVD equipment. These subsidies have enabled and encouraged certain customers in this region to purchase more of our MOCVD equipment than these customers might have purchased without these subsidies. The availability of these subsidies has varied over time and may end at some point in the future. A reduction or elimination of these incentives may result in a reduction in future orders for our MOCVD equipment in this region, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, in an effort to promote Chinese competition, the Chinese government could impose restrictions on the receipt of these subsidies, including requirements that the purchased equipment be sourced locally.

A related risk is that many customers use or had planned to use Chinese government subsidies, in addition to other incentives from the Chinese government, to build new manufacturing facilities or to expand existing manufacturing facilities. Delays in the start-up of these facilities or the cancellation of construction plans altogether, together with other related issues pertaining to customer readiness, could adversely impact the timing of our revenue recognition, could result in order cancellations, a reduction in order backlog, and could have other negative effects on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The cyclicality of the industries we serve directly affects our business.

Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of manufacturers in the LED, mobile communication, data storage, and other device markets. We are subject to the business cycles of these industries, the timing, length, and volatility of which are difficult to predict. These industries have historically been highly cyclical and have experienced significant economic downturns in the last decade. As a capital equipment provider, our revenue depends in large part on the spending patterns of these customers, who often delay expenditures or cancel or reschedule orders in reaction to variations in their businesses or general economic conditions. In downturns, we must be able to quickly and effectively align our costs with prevailing market conditions, as well as motivate and retain key employees. However, because a portion of our costs are fixed, our ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to revenue shortfalls may be limited. Downturns in one or more of these industries have had and will likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and operating results. Alternatively, during periods of rapid growth, we must be able to acquire and/or develop sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand and attract, hire, assimilate, and retain a sufficient number of qualified people. We cannot give assurances that our net sales and operating results will not be adversely affected if our customers experience economic downturns or slowdowns in their businesses.

We operate in industries characterized by rapid technological change.

Each of the industries in which we operate is subject to rapid technological change. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to enhance existing products and develop and manufacture new products in a timely and cost effective manner and to accurately predict technology transitions. Because new product development commitments must be made well in advance of sales, we must anticipate the future demand for products when selecting which development programs to fund and pursue. Our financial results depend to a great extent on the successful introduction of several new products, many of which require achieving increasingly stringent technical specifications. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing, and marketing new products or new technologies or in enhancing existing products. Our performance may be adversely affected if we are unable to accurately predict evolving market trends and related customer needs and to effectively allocate our resources among new and existing products and technologies.

We are also exposed to potential risks associated with unexpected product performance issues. Our product designs and manufacturing processes are complex and could contain unexpected product defects, especially when products are first introduced. Unexpected product performance issues could result in significant costs and damages, including increased service and warranty expenses, the need to provide product replacements or modifications, reimbursement for damages caused by our products, product recalls, related litigation, and product write-offs and disposal costs. These costs could be

substantial and our reputation could be harmed, resulting in reduced demand for our products and could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We have a concentrated customer base, located primarily in a limited number of regions, which operate in highly concentrated industries.

Our customer base continues to be highly concentrated. Orders from a relatively limited number of customers have accounted for, and likely will continue to account for, a substantial portion of our net sales, which may lead customers to demand pricing and other terms less favorable to us. Our five largest customers accounted for 39% of our total net sales in 2016. Customer consolidation activity involving some of our largest customers could result in an even greater concentration of our sales in the future. Management changes at key customer accounts could result in a loss of future sales due to vendor preferences or other reasons and may introduce new challenges in managing customer relationships.

If a principal customer discontinues its relationship with us or suffers economic setbacks, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. Our ability to increase sales in the future will depend in part upon our ability to obtain orders from new customers. We cannot be certain that we will be able to do so. In addition, because a relatively small number of large manufacturers, many of whom are our customers, dominate the industries in which they operate, it may be especially difficult for us to replace these customers if we lose their business. A significant portion of orders in our backlog are orders from our principal customers.

In addition, a substantial investment is required by customers to install and integrate capital equipment into a production line. As a result, once a manufacturer has selected a particular vendor’s capital equipment, we believe that the manufacturer generally relies upon that equipment for the specific production line application and frequently will attempt to consolidate its other capital equipment requirements with the same vendor. Accordingly, if a customer selects a competitor’s product over ours, we could experience difficulty selling to that customer for a significant period of time.

Furthermore, we do not have long-term contracts with our customers. As a result, our agreements with our customers do not provide any assurance of future sales, and we are exposed to competitive price pressure on each new order we attempt to obtain. Our failure to obtain new sales orders from new or existing customers would have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our customer base is also highly concentrated in terms of geography, and the majority of our sales are to customers located in a limited number of countries. In 2016, 26% of our total net sales were to customers located in China. Dependence upon sales emanating from a limited number of regions increases our risk of exposure to local difficulties and challenges, such as those associated with regional economic downturns, political instability, fluctuating currency exchange rates, natural disasters, social unrest, pandemics, terrorism, or acts of war. Our reliance upon customer demand arising primarily from a limited number of countries could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

We face significant competition.

We face significant competition throughout the world, which may increase as certain markets in which we operate continue to evolve. Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing, and marketing resources than us. Other competitors are located in regions with lower labor costs and other reduced costs of operation. In addition, our ability to compete in foreign countries against local manufacturers may be hampered by nationalism, social attitudes, laws, regulations, and policies within such countries that favor local companies over U.S. companies or that are otherwise designed to promote the development and growth of local competitors. Furthermore, we face competition from smaller emerging equipment companies whose strategy is to provide a portion of the products and services we offer, with a focused approach on innovative technology for specialized markets. New product introductions or enhancements by us or our competitors could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing or prior generation products. Increased competitive pressure could also lead to intensified price competition resulting in lower margins. Our failure to compete successfully with these other companies would seriously harm our business.

To remain competitive, we may enter into strategic alliances with customers, suppliers, and other third parties to explore new market opportunities and possible technological advancements. These alliances may require significant investments of capital and other resources and often involve the exchange of sensitive confidential information. The success of these

alliances may depend on factors over which we have limited control and will likely require ongoing cooperation and good faith efforts from our strategic partners. Strategic alliances are inherently subject to significant risks, and the inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

The timing of our orders, shipments, and revenue recognition may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

We derive a substantial portion of our net sales in any fiscal period from the sale of a relatively small number of high-priced systems. As a result, the timing of recognition of revenue for a single transaction could have a material effect on our sales and operating results for a particular fiscal period. As is typical in our industry, orders, shipments, and customer acceptances often occur during the last few weeks of a quarter. As a result, a delay of only a week or two can impact which period revenue is reported in and can cause volatility in our revenue for a given reporting period. Our quarterly results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect this trend to continue. If our orders, shipments, net sales, or operating results in a particular quarter do not meet expectations, our stock price may be adversely affected.

Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable.

Historically, we have experienced long and unpredictable sales cycles (the period between our initial contact with a potential customer and the time when we recognize revenue from that customer). Our sales cycle can exceed twelve months. The timing of an order often depends on the capital expenditure budget cycle of our customers, which is completely out of our control. In addition, the time it takes us to returnbuild a product to profitability.

10



Tablecustomer specifications typically ranges from three to six months. When coupled with the fluctuating amount of Contentstime required for shipment, installation, and final acceptance, our sales cycles often vary widely, and variations in length of this period can cause further fluctuations in our operating results. As a result of our lengthy sales cycle, we may incur significant research, development, selling, general, and/or administrative expenses before we generate revenues for these products. We may never generate the anticipated revenues if a customer cancels or changes plans. Variations in the length of our sales cycle could also cause our sales and, therefore, our cash flow and results of operations to fluctuate widely from period to period.

 

TimingOur backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification which could result in decreased sales, increased inventory obsolescence, and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

Customer purchase orders may be cancelled or rescheduled by the customer, sometimes with limited or no penalties, which may result in increased and/or unrecoverable costs for the Company. We adjust our backlog for such cancellations, contract modifications, and delivery delays that result in a delivery period in excess of market adoptionone year, among other items. A downturn in one or more of LED technologyour businesses could result in increases in order cancellations and/or postponements.

We write-off excess and obsolete inventory based on historical trends, future usage forecasts, and other factors including the consideration of the amount of backlog we have on hand. If our backlog is canceled or modified, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated the write-off required for general lightingexcess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory is uncertain.overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in our financial statements at the time of such determination. In addition, we place orders with our suppliers based on our customers’ orders. If our customers cancel their orders with us, we may not be able to cancel our orders with our suppliers or may be required to take a charge for these cancelled commitments to our suppliers. Any such charges could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

Our failure to estimate customer demand accurately could result in inventory obsolescence, liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed, and/or manufacturing interruptions or delays which could affect our ability to meet customer demand.

 

Our future business prospects depend largelydepends on our ability to accurately forecast and supply equipment, services, and related products that meet the rapidly changing technical and volume requirements of our customers, which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts, components, and subassemblies (collectively, “parts”) from suppliers. Uncertain worldwide economic conditions and market adoptioninstabilities make it difficult for us (and our customers and our suppliers) to accurately forecast future product demand. If actual demand for our products is different than expected, we may purchase more/fewer parts than necessary or incur costs for canceling, postponing, or expediting delivery of parts. If we overestimate the demand for our products,

excess inventory could result, which could be subject to heavy price discounting, which could become obsolete, and/or which could subject us to liabilities to our suppliers for products that incorporate our technologies. Potential barriers to such adoption include higher initial costs and customer familiarity with, and substantial investment and know-how in, existing technologies.  These barriers apply to the adoption of LED technology for general illumination applications, including residential, commercial and street lighting markets. While the use of LED technology for general lighting has grown in recent years, challenges remain and widespread adoptionno longer needed. Similarly, we may not occur at currently projected rates. Furthermore, the adoption of, or changes in, government policies that discourage the use of traditional lighting technologies may impact LED adoption.  These barriers also apply to the adoption of OLED products.  While the use of OLED is expected to growbe harmed in the near future, itevent that our competitors overestimate the demand for their products and engage in heavy price discounting practices as a result. In addition, the volatility of demand for capital equipment increases capital, technical, and other risks for companies in our supply chain.

Furthermore, some key parts may be subject to long lead-times and/or obtainable only from a single supplier or limited group of suppliers, and some sourcing or subassembly is difficultprovided by suppliers located in countries other than the United States. We may experience significant interruptions of our manufacturing operations, delays in our ability to predict deliver products or services, increased costs, or customer order cancellations as a result of:

·the rate at which OLED willfailure or inability of suppliers to timely deliver quality parts;

·volatility in the availability and cost of materials;

·difficulties or delays in obtaining required import or export approvals;

·information technology or infrastructure failures;

·natural disasters (such as earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, or storms); or

·other causes (such as regional economic downturns, pandemics, political instability, terrorism, or acts of war) that could result in delayed deliveries, manufacturing inefficiencies, increased costs, or order cancellations.

In addition, in the event of an unanticipated increase in demand for our products, our need to rapidly increase our business and manufacturing capacity may be adoptedlimited by working capital constraints of our suppliers and may exacerbate any interruptions in our manufacturing operations and supply chain and the market. The market adoptionassociated effect on our working capital. Any or all of OLED products may not occur atthese factors could materially and adversely affect our currently projected rates.business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

Our failure to successfully manage our outsourcing activities or failure of our outsourcing partners to perform as anticipated could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability to adapt to fluctuating order volumes.

 

To better align our costs with market conditions, increase the percentage of variable costs relative to total costs, and to increase productivity and operational efficiency, we have outsourced certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, Data Storage systems and ion sources.systems. We are relyingrely heavily on our outsourcing partners to perform their contracted functions and to allow us the flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions, including periods of significantly diminished order volumes. If our outsourcing partners do not perform as required, or if our outsourcing model does not allow us to realize the intended cost savings and flexibility, our results of operations (and those of our third party providers) may be adversely affected. Disputes and possibly litigation involving third party providers could result, and we could suffer damage to our reputation. Dependence on contract manufacturing and outsourcing may also adversely affect our ability to bring new products to market. Although we attempt to select reputable providers, it is possible that one or more of these providers could fail to perform as we expect. In addition, the role of third party providers has required and will continue to require us to implement changes to our existing operations and adopt new procedures and processes for retaining and managing these providers in order to realize operational efficiencies, assure quality, and protect our intellectual property. If we do not effectively manage our outsourcing strategy or if third party providers do not perform as anticipated, we may not realize the benefits of productivity improvements, and we may experience operational difficulties, increased costs, manufacturing and/or installation interruptions or delays, inefficiencies in the structure and/or operation of our supply chain, loss of intellectual property rights, quality issues, increased product time-to-market and/or inefficient allocation of human resources, any or all of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

The further reduction or elimination of foreign government subsidies and economic incentives may adversely affect the future order rate for our MOCVD equipment.

We generate a significant portion of our revenue in China. In recent years, the Chinese government has provided various incentives to encourage development of the LED industry, including subsidizing a significant portion of the purchase cost of MOCVD equipment. These subsidies have enabled and encouraged certain customers in this region to purchase more of our MOCVD equipment than these customers might have purchased without these subsidies. These subsidies have now been curtailed and are expected to further decline over time and may end at some point in the future. The further reduction or elimination of these incentives may result in a further reduction in future orders for our MOCVD equipment in this region which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A related risk is that many customers use or had planned to use Chinese government subsidies, in addition to other incentives from the Chinese government, to build new manufacturing facilities or to expand existing manufacturing facilities. Delays in the start-up of these facilities or the cancellation of construction plans altogether, together with other related issues pertaining to customer readiness, could adversely impact the timing of our revenue recognition, could result in further order cancellations, and could have other negative effects on our financial condition and operating results.

11



Table of Contents

Our operating results have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by tightening credit markets.

As a global company with worldwide operations, we are subject to volatility and adverse consequences associated with worldwide economic downturns. As seen in recent years, in the event of a worldwide downturn, many of our customers may delay or further reduce their purchases of our products and services. If negative conditions in the global credit markets prevent our customers’ access to credit, product orders in these channels may decrease which could result in lower revenue. Likewise, if our suppliers face challenges in obtaining credit, in selling their products or otherwise in operating their businesses, they may become unable to continue to offer the materials we use to manufacture our products. With the recent downturn in our MOCVD segment, we have experienced, and may continue to experience, lower than anticipated order levels, cancellations of orders in backlog, rescheduling of customer deliveries, and attendant pricing pressures, all of which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Furthermore, tightening macroeconomic measures and monetary policies adopted by China’s government aimed at preventing overheating of China’s economy and controlling China’s high level of inflation have limited, and may continue to limit, the availability of financing to our customers in this region. Limited financing, or delays in the timing of such financing, may result in delays and cancellations of shipments of our products (and associated revenues) conditioned on such financing.

In addition, we finance a portion of our sales through trade credit. In addition to ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition, we seek to mitigate our credit risk by obtaining deposits and/or letters of credit on certain of our sales arrangements. We could suffer significant losses if a customer whose accounts receivable we have not secured fails or is otherwise unable to pay us. A significant loss in collections on our accounts receivable would have a negative impact on our financial results.

Our backlog is subject to customer cancellation or modification and such cancellation could result in decreased sales and increased provisions for excess and obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

Customer purchase orders are subject to cancellation or rescheduling by the customer, sometimes with limited or no penalties. Often, we have incurred expenses prior to such cancellation without adequate monetary compensation. We adjust our backlog for such cancellations, contract modifications, and delivery delays that result in a delivery period in excess of one year, among other items. The current and forecasted downturn in our MOCVD reporting unit could result in further increases in order cancellations and/or postponements.

We record a provision for excess and obsolete inventory based on historical and future usage trends and other factors including the consideration of the amount of backlog we have on hand at any particular point in time. If our backlog is canceled or modified, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory is overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in our financial statements at the time of such determination. In addition, we place orders with our suppliers based on our customers’ orders to us. If our customers cancel their orders with us, we may not be able to cancel our orders with our suppliers and may be required to take a charge for these cancelled commitments to our suppliers. Any such charges could be material to our results of operations and financial condition.

Our failure to estimate customer demand accurately could result in excess or obsolete inventory and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed, while manufacturing interruptions or delays could affect our ability to meet customer demand.

Our business depends on our ability to accurately forecast and supply equipment, services and related products that meet the rapidly changing technical and volume requirements of our customers, which depends in part on the timely delivery of parts, components and subassemblies (collectively, parts) from suppliers. The current uncertain worldwide economic conditions and market instabilities make it increasingly difficult for us (and our customers and our suppliers) to accurately forecast future product demand. If actual demand for our products is different than expected, we may purchase more/fewer parts than necessary or incur costs for canceling, postponing or expediting delivery of parts. If we overestimate the demand for our products, excess inventory could result which could be subject to heavy price discounting, which could become

12



Table of Contents

obsolete, and which could subject us to liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed. In addition, the volatility of demand for capital equipment increases capital, technical and other risks for companies in the supply chain.

Furthermore, some key parts may be subject to long lead-times and/or obtainable only from a single supplier or limited group of suppliers, and some sourcing or subassembly is provided by suppliers located in countries other than the United States. We may experience significant interruptions of our manufacturing operations, delays in our ability to deliver products or services, increased costs or customer order cancellations as a result of:

·the failure or inability of suppliers to timely deliver quality parts;

·volatility in the availability and cost of materials;

·difficulties or delays in obtaining required import or export approvals;

·information technology or infrastructure failures;

·natural disasters (such as earthquakes, tsunamis, floods or storms); or

·other causes (such as regional economic downturns, pandemics, political instability, terrorism, or acts of war) could result in delayed deliveries, manufacturing inefficiencies, increased costs or order cancellations.

In addition, in the event of an unanticipated increase in demand for our products, our need to rapidly increase our business and manufacturing capacity may be limited by working capital constraints of our suppliers and may exacerbate any interruptions in our manufacturing operations and supply chain and the associated effect on our working capital. Any or all of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The cyclicality of the industries we serve directly affects our business.

Our business depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of manufacturers in the LED markets, data storage markets, and other device markets. We are subject to the business cycles of these industries, the timing, length, and volatility of which are difficult to predict. These industries have historically been highly cyclical and have experienced significant economic downturns in the last decade. As a capital equipment provider, our revenues depend in large part on the spending patterns of these customers, who often delay expenditures or cancel or reschedule orders in reaction to variations in their businesses or general economic conditions. In downturns, we must be able to quickly and effectively align our costs with prevailing market conditions, as well as motivate and retain key employees. However, because a portion of our costs are fixed, our ability to reduce expenses quickly in response to revenue shortfalls may be limited. Downturns in one or more of these industries, including the current MOCVD and Data Storage downturn, have had and will likely have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results. Alternatively, during periods of rapid growth, we must be able to acquire and/or develop sufficient manufacturing capacity to meet customer demand, and attract, hire, assimilate and retain a sufficient number of qualified people. We cannot give assurances that our net sales and operating results will not be adversely affected if our customers experience economic downturns or slowdowns in their businesses.

We rely on a limited number of suppliers, some of whom are our sole source for particular components.

 

We currently outsource certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our new MOCVD systems, Data Storage systems and ion sources.systems. We primarily rely on severala small number of suppliers for the manufacturing of these systems. We plan toWhile we maintain some level of internal manufacturing capability for these systems. Thesystems, the failure of our present suppliers to meet their contractual obligations under our supply arrangements and our inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems

ourselves could have a material adverse effect on our revenues, profitability, cash flows, and relationships with our customers.

13



Tablecustomers and/or our business, financial condition, and results of Contentsoperations.

 

In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in our products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. Our inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect our operating results.business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our inability to attract, retain, and motivate employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our success depends upon our ability to attract, retain, and motivate employees, including those in executive, managerial, engineering, and marketing positions, as well as highly skilled and qualified technical personnel and personnel to implement and monitor our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems. Attracting, retaining, and motivating such qualified personnel may be difficult due to challenging industry conditions, competition for such personnel by other technology companies, consolidations and relocations of operations, and workforce reductions, and there can be no assurance that we will be successful in recruiting or retaining key personnel. We have entered into employment agreements with certain key personnel but our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our acquisition strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and integrating these businesses.

We have completed several significant acquisitions in the past, and we will consider acquisitions of, or investments in, other businesses in the future. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, many of which are unpredictable and beyond our control, including, but not limited to:

·difficulties and increased costs in integrating the personnel, operations, technologies, and products of acquired companies;

·diversion of management’s attention while evaluating, pursuing, and integrating the business to be acquired;

·the inability to complete proposed transactions as anticipated, resulting in obligations to pay professional and other expenses, including any applicable termination fees;

·potential loss of key employees of acquired companies, especially if a relocation or change in responsibilities is involved;

·difficulties in managing geographically dispersed operations in a cost-effective manner;

·the unattainability of expected synergies;

·unknown, underestimated, and/or undisclosed commitments or liabilities;

·increased amortization expense relating to intangible assets; and

·other adverse effects on our business, including the potential impairment and write-down of amounts capitalized as intangible assets and goodwill as part of the acquisition, as a result of technological advancements or worse-than-expected performance by the acquired company.

Our inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, if we issue equity securities to pay for an acquisition, the ownership percentage of our then-current shareholders would be reduced and the value of the shares held by these shareholders could be diluted, which could adversely affect the price of our stock. If we use cash to pay for an acquisition, the payment could significantly reduce the cash that would be available to fund our operations or other purposes.

Timing of market adoption of LED technology for general lighting is uncertain.

Our future business prospects depend largely on the market adoption of products that incorporate our technologies. Potential barriers to such adoption include higher initial costs and customer familiarity with, and substantial investment

and know-how in, existing technologies. These barriers apply to the adoption of LED technology for general illumination applications, including residential, commercial, and street lighting markets. While the use of LED technology for general lighting has grown in recent years, challenges remain and widespread adoption (and the related demand for our products) may not occur at currently projected rates. Furthermore, the adoption of, or changes in, government policies that discourage the use of traditional lighting technologies may impact LED adoption.

 

Our sales to LED and data storage manufacturers are highly dependent on these manufacturers’ sales forof consumer electronics applications, which can experience significant volatility due to seasonal and other factors which couldand materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

 

The demand for LEDs, HDDs, and hard disk drivesour other products is highly dependent on sales of consumer electronics, such as flat-panel televisions and computer monitors, computers, tablets, digital video recorders, camcorders, MP3/4 players, smartphones, cell phones, and other mobile devices. Manufacturers of LEDs and hard disk drives are among our largest customers and have accountedaccount for a substantial portion of our revenues for the past several years.revenue. Factors that could influence the levels of spending on consumer electronic products include consumer confidence, access to credit, volatility in fuel and other energy costs, conditions in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, labor and healthcare costs, and other macroeconomic factors affecting consumer spending behavior. These and other economic factors have had and could continue to have a material adverse effect on the demand for our customers’ products and, in turn, on our customers’ demand for our products and services and onimpacting our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, manufacturers of LEDs have in the past overestimated their potential for market share growth. If this growth is currently overestimated, or is overestimated in the future, we may experience further cancellations of orders in backlog, rescheduling of customer deliveries, obsolete inventory, and/or liabilities to our suppliers for products no longer needed.

 

In addition, the demand for some of our customers’ products can be even more volatile and unpredictable due to the possibility of competing technologies, such as flash memory as an alternative to hard disk drives.HDDs. Unpredictable fluctuations in demand for our customers’ products or rapid shifts in demand from our customers’ products to alternative technologies could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

Our operating results have been, and may continue to be, adversely affected by tightening credit markets.

As a global company with worldwide operations, we are subject to volatility and adverse consequences associated with economic downturns in different parts of the world. In the event of a downturn, many of our customers may delay or further reduce their purchases of our products and services. If negative conditions in the credit markets prevent our customers from obtaining credit or necessary financing, product orders in these channels may decrease, which could result in lower revenue. In addition, we may experience cancellations of orders in backlog, rescheduling of customer deliveries, and pricing pressures. If our suppliers face challenges in obtaining credit, in selling their products, or otherwise in operating their businesses, they may become unable to continue to offer the materials we use to manufacture our products, which could impair our operations.

In addition, we finance some of our sales through trade credit. In addition to ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition, we seek to mitigate our credit risk by obtaining deposits and/or letters of credit on certain of our sales arrangements. We could suffer significant losses if a customer whose accounts receivable we have not secured fails or is otherwise unable to pay us, or if financial institutions providing letters of credit become insolvent. A significant loss in collections on our accounts receivable would have a negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

We are exposed to the risks of operating a global business, including the need to obtain export licenses for certain of our shipments and political risks in the countries we operate.

 

Approximately 83%, 84%, and 90%Most of our net sales for the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively were generated from salesare to customers located outside of the United States. We expect sales from non-U.S. markets to continue to represent a significant and possibly increasing, portion of our sales in the future. Our non-U.S. sales and operations are subject to risks inherent in conducting business abroad,outside the United States, many of which are outside our control, including:

 

·                 difficulties in managing a global enterprise, including staffing, managing distributors and representatives, and repatriation of earnings;repatriating cash in a tax efficient manner;

 

·                 regional economic downturns, varying foreign government support, and unstable political environments;

·                 political and social attitudes, laws, rules, regulations, and policies within countries that favor domesticlocal companies over non-domesticU.S. companies, including government-supported efforts to promote the development and growth of local competitors;

·pressures from foreign customers and foreign governments for us to increase our operations and sourcing in the foreign country;

 

·                 longer sales cycles and difficulty in collecting accounts receivable;

 

·              multiple, conflicting, and changing governmental laws and regulations, including varying labor laws, tax regulations, import/export controls, changes to trade treaties, possible trade wars and other trade barriers;barriers and uncertainties;

 

·                 reliance on various information systems and information technology to conduct our business, which may be vulnerable to cyber-attackscyberattacks by third parties or breached due to employee error, misuse or other causes that could result in business disruptions, loss of or damage to intellectual property, transaction errors, processing inefficiencies, or other adverse consequences should our security practices and procedures prove ineffective,ineffective; and

 

·                 different customs and ways of doing business.

 

14



Table of Contents

These challenges, many of which are associated with sales into China,the Asia-Pacific region, may continue and recur again in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, political instability, terrorism, acts of war, tsunamis, or epidemics in regions where we operate may adversely affect or disrupt our business and results of operations.

 

Furthermore, products which are either manufactured in the United States or based on U.S. technology are subject to the United StatesU.S. Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”) when exported to and re-exported from international jurisdictions, in addition to the local jurisdiction’s export regulations applicable to individual shipments. Currently, our MOCVD deposition systems and certain of our other products are controlled for export under the EAR. Licenses or proper license exceptions may be required for the shipment of our products to certain countries. Obtaining an export license requires cooperation from the customer and customer-facility readiness and can add time to the order fulfillment process. While we have generally been successful in obtaining export licenses in a timely manner, there can be no assurance that this will continue or that an export license can be obtained in each instance where it is required. If an export license is required but cannot be obtained, then we will not be permitted to export the product to the customer. The administrative processing, potential delay, and risk of ultimately not obtaining an export license pose a particular disadvantage to us relative to our non-U.S. competitors who are not required to comply with U.S. export controls. Non-compliance with the EAR or other applicable export regulations could result in a wide range of penalties including the denial of export privileges, fines, criminal penalties, and the seizure of commodities. In the event that any export regulatory body determines that any of our shipments violate applicable export regulations, we could be fined significant sums and/or our export capabilities could be restricted, which could have a material adverse impact on our business.

 

We may be exposed to liabilities under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and any determination that we violated these or similar laws could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and other laws that prohibit improper payments or offers of payments to foreign government officials, as defined by the statute, for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business. In addition, many of our customers have policies limiting or prohibiting us from providing certain types or amounts of entertainment, meals, or gifts to their employees. It is our policy to implement safeguards to discourage these practices by our employees and representatives. However, our safeguards may prove to be ineffective and our employees, consultants, sales agents, or distributors may engage in conduct for which we may be held responsible. In addition, we may acquire a company that has engaged in unlawful conduct in the past, and be held responsible for this conduct through successor liability principles. Violations of the FCPA or similar laws or similar customer policies may result in severe criminal or civil sanctions or the loss of supplier privileges to a customer, and we may be subject to other liabilities, which could negatively affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

The timing of our orders, shipments, and revenue recognition may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

We derive a substantial portion of our net sales in any fiscal period from the sale of a relatively small number of high-priced systems. As a result, the timing of recognition of revenue for a single transaction could have a material effect on our sales and operating results for a particular fiscal period. As is typical in our industry, orders, shipments, and customer acceptances often occur during the last few weeks of a quarter. As a result, delay of only a week or two will determine which period revenue is reported in and can cause volatility in our revenue for a given reporting period. Our quarterly results have fluctuated significantly in the past, and we expect this trend to continue. If our orders, shipments, net sales or operating results in a particular quarter do not meet expectations, our stock price may be adversely affected.

We operate in industries characterized by rapid technological change.

All of our businesses are subject to rapid technological change. Our ability to remain competitive depends on our ability to enhance existing products and develop and manufacture new products in a timely and cost effective manner and to accurately predict technology transitions. Because new product development commitments must be made well in advance of sales, we must anticipate the future demand for products in selecting which development programs to fund and pursue. Our financial results for the current year and in the future will depend to a great extent on the successful introduction of several new products, many of which require achieving increasingly stringent technical specifications. We cannot be certain that we will be successful in selecting, developing, manufacturing and marketing new products or new technologies or in enhancing existing products.

15



Table of Contents

We face significant competition.

We face significant competition throughout the world in each of our reportable segments, which may increase as certain markets in which we operate continue to expand. Some of our competitors have greater financial, engineering, manufacturing, and marketing resources than us. In addition, we face competition from smaller emerging equipment companies whose strategy is to provide a portion of the products and services we offer, with a focused approach on innovative technology for specialized markets. New product introductions or enhancements by our competitors could cause a decline in sales or loss of market acceptance of our existing products. Increased competitive pressure could also lead to intensified price competition resulting in lower margins. Our failure to compete successfully with these other companies would seriously harm our business.

We depend on a limited number of customers, located primarily in a limited number of regions, which operate in highly concentrated industries.

Our customer base is and has been highly concentrated. Orders from a relatively limited number of customers have accounted for, and likely will continue to account for, a substantial portion of our net sales, which may lead customers to demand pricing and other terms less favorable to us. Based on net sales, our five largest customers accounted for 42%, 34%, and 41% of our total net sales for the years ended 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Customer consolidation activity involving some of our largest customers could result in an even greater concentration of our sales in the future.

If a principal customer discontinues its relationship with us or suffers economic setbacks, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected. Our ability to increase sales in the future will depend in part upon our ability to obtain orders from new customers. We cannot be certain that we will be able to do so. In addition, because a relatively small number of large manufacturers, many of whom are our customers, dominate the industries in which they operate, it may be especially difficult for us to replace these customers if we lose their business. A substantial portion of orders in our backlog are orders from our principal customers.

In addition, a substantial investment is required by customers to install and integrate capital equipment into a production line. As a result, once a manufacturer has selected a particular vendor’s capital equipment, we believe that the manufacturer generally relies upon that equipment for the specific production line application and frequently will attempt to consolidate its other capital equipment requirements with the same vendor. Accordingly, if a customer selects a competitor’s product over ours for technical superiority or other reasons, we could experience difficulty selling to that customer for a significant period of time.

Furthermore, we do not have long-term contracts with our customers. As a result, our agreements with our customers do not provide any assurance of future sales and we are exposed to competitive price pressure on each new order we attempt to obtain. Our failure to obtain new sales orders from new or existing customers would have a negative impact on our results of operations.

Our customer base is also highly concentrated in terms of geography, and the majority of our sales are to customers located in a limited number of countries. In 2013, 62% of our total net sales were to customers located in China, Taiwan and South Korea. Dependence upon sales emanating from a limited number of regions increases our risk of exposure to local difficulties and challenges, such as those associated with regional economic downturns, political instability, fluctuating currency exchange rates, natural disasters, social unrest, pandemics, terrorism or acts of war. In addition, we may encounter challenges associated with political and social attitudes, laws, rules, regulations and policies within these countries that favor domestic companies over non-domestic companies, including customer- or government-supported efforts to promote the development and growth of local competitors. Our reliance upon customer demand arising primarily from a limited number of countries could materially adversely impact our future results of operations.

Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable.

Historically, we have experienced long and unpredictable sales cycles (the period between our initial contact with a potential customer and the time when we recognize revenue from that customer). Our sales cycle can range up to twelve months or longer. The timing of an order often depends on the capital expenditure budget cycle of our customers, which is completely out of our control. In addition, the time it takes us to build a product to customer specifications typically ranges

16



Table of Contents

from one to six months. When coupled with the fluctuating amount of time required for shipment, installation and final acceptance, our sales cycles often vary widely, and variations in length of this period can cause further fluctuations in our operating results. As a result of our lengthy sales cycle, we may incur significant research and development expenses and selling and general and administrative expenses before we generate revenues for these products. We may never generate the anticipated revenues if a customer cancels or changes plans. Variations in the length of our sales cycle could also cause our sales and, therefore, our cash flow and net income to fluctuate widely from period to period.

We are subject to internal control evaluations and attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and any delays or difficulty in satisfying these requirements or negative reports concerning our internal controls could adversely affect our future results of operations and our stock price.

 

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we must include in our Annual Report on Form 10-K a report by management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Ongoing compliance with this requirement is complex, costly, time-consuming, and is subject to significant judgment. If our internal controls are ineffective or if our management does not timely assess the adequacy of such internal controls, our ability to file timely and accurate periodic reports may be impeded. Any delays in filing may cause us to face the following risks and concerns, among others:

 

·                 concern on the part of our customers, partners, investors, and employees about our financial condition and filing delay status, including the potential loss of business opportunities;

 

·                 significant time and expense required to complete delayed filings and the distraction of our senior management team and board of directors as we work to complete delayed filings;

 

·                 investigations by the SEC and other regulatory authorities of the Company and of members ofand/or our management;

 

·                 limitations on our ability to raise capital and make acquisitions;capital;

 

·                 suspension or termination of our stock listing on theThe NASDAQ stock exchange,Stock Market and the removal of our stock as a component of certain stock market indices; and

 

·                 general reputational harm.

 

Any or all of the foregoing could result in the commencement of stockholder lawsuits against the Company. Any such litigation, as well as any proceedings that could arise as a result of a filing delay and the circumstances which gave rise to it, may be time consuming and expensive, may divert management attention from the conduct of our business, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, and may expose us to costly indemnification obligations to current or former officers, directors, or other personnel, regardless of the outcome of such matters, which may not be adequately covered by insurance.

 

Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices may adversely affect our financial results.

Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results. New accounting pronouncements or taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements or taxation practices have occurred and may occur in the future. New rules, changes to existing rules, or the questioning of our current or past practices, such as those associated with our transfer pricing, may adversely affect our reported financial results.

Our income taxes can change.

We are subject to income tax on a jurisdictional or legal entity basis and significant judgment is required in certain instances to allocate our taxable income to a jurisdiction and to determine the related income tax expense and benefits. Losses in one jurisdiction generally may not be used to offset profits in other jurisdictions. As a result, changes in the mix of our earnings (or losses) between jurisdictions, among other factors, could alter our overall effective income tax rate, possibly resulting in significant tax rate increases.

We are regularly audited by various tax authorities. Income tax audit assessments or changes in tax laws, regulations, or other interpretations may result in increased tax provisions which could materially affect our operating results in the period or periods in which such determinations are made or changes occur.

In addition, our effective tax rate could increase if we determine that it is no longer more likely than not that we are able to utilize our remaining net deferred tax assets, if we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain jurisdictions, or if we are otherwise required to increase our valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets.

We may be required to take additional impairment charges on assets.

We are required to assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment, or on an interim basis, whenever certain events occur or circumstances change, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry, that would more likely than not reduce the fair value below its carrying amount. We are also required to test our long-lived assets, including acquired intangible assets and property, plant, and equipment, for recoverability and impairment whenever there are indicators of impairment, such as an adverse change in business climate.

As part of our long-term strategy, we may pursue future acquisitions of other companies or assets which could potentially increase our assets. Adverse changes in business conditions could materially impact our estimates of future operations and result in impairment charges to these assets. In the future, a significant decline in the market price of our common stock could indicate a decline in the fair value of our reporting unit such that goodwill becomes impaired. If our assets were impaired, our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We have indebtedness in the form of convertible senior notes which could adversely affect our financial position, prevent us from implementing our strategy, and dilute the ownership interest of our existing shareholders.

In January of 2017, we issued $345 million of 2.70% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 (“Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are convertible into Company common stock at an initial conversion rate of 24.98 shares of Company common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes. The Company is obligated to repurchase the Convertibles Notes upon the occurrence of certain events described in the indenture relating to the Convertible Notes. The degree to which we are leveraged could have negative consequences, including but not limited to the following:

·we may be more vulnerable to economic downturns, less able to withstand competitive pressures, and less flexible in responding to changing business and economic conditions;

·our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, general corporate, or other purposes may be limited;

·a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations in the future may be required for the payment of the principal amount of our existing indebtedness when it becomes due; and

·we may elect to make cash payments upon any conversion of the Convertible Notes, which would reduce our cash on hand.

Our ability to meet our payment obligations under the Convertible Notes depends on our ability to generate significant cash flow in the future. This, to some extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, and regulatory factors, as well as other factors, that are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that our business will generate cash flow from operations, or that additional capital will be available to us, in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet our debt payment obligations and to fund other liquidity needs. If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow to service our debt obligations, we may need to refinance or restructure our debt, sell assets, reduce or delay capital investments, or seek to raise additional capital. If we were unable to implement one or more of these alternatives, we may be unable to meet our debt payment obligations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition.

Furthermore, if the Convertible Notes are converted into shares of Company common stock, the issuance of additional shares of Company common stock would dilute the ownership interest of our existing shareholders and could have a dilutive effect on our net income per share to the extent that the price of our common stock exceeds the conversion price of the Convertible Notes. In addition, any sales in the public market of our common stock issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes could adversely affect prevailing market prices of our common stock.

The accounting method for convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash, such as the Convertible Notes, could have a material effect on our reported financial results.

Under Accounting Standards Codification 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, which we refer to as ASC

470-20, an entity must separately account for the liability and equity components of certain convertible debt instruments (such as the Convertible Notes) that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. The effect of ASC 470-20 on the accounting for the Convertible Notes is that the equity component is required to be included in the additional paid-in capital section of stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheet, and the value of the equity component would be treated as original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Convertible Notes. As a result, we will be required to record a greater amount of non-cash interest expense in current periods presented as a result of the amortization of the discounted carrying value of the Convertible Notes to their face amount over the term of the Convertible Notes. We will report lower net income in our financial results because ASC 470-20 will require interest to include both the current period’s amortization of the debt discount and the instrument’s coupon interest, which could adversely affect our financial results, the trading price of our common stock, and the trading price of the Convertible Notes.

In addition, under certain circumstances, convertible debt instruments (such as the Convertible Notes) that may be settled entirely or partly in cash can be accounted for utilizing the treasury stock method, the effect of which is that the shares issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share except to the extent that the conversion value of the Convertible Notes exceeds their principal amount. Under the treasury stock method, for diluted earnings per share purposes, the transaction is accounted for as if the number of shares of common stock that would be necessary to settle such excess, if we elected to settle such excess in shares, are issued. We cannot be sure that the accounting standards in the future will continue to permit the use of the treasury stock method or that we will continue to expect to settle the principal balance in cash. If we are unable to use the treasury stock method in accounting for the shares issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, our diluted earnings per share could be adversely affected.

The price of our common shares may beis volatile and could decline significantly.

 

The stock market in general and the market for technology stocks in particular has experienced volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating performance of companies.volatility. If these industry-based market or industry-based fluctuations continue, the trading price of our common shares could decline significantly independent of our actual operating performance,the overall market, and shareholders could lose all or a substantial part of their investment. The market price of our common shares could fluctuate significantly in response to several factors, including, among others:

 

·                 difficult macroeconomic conditions, unfavorable geopolitical events, and general stock market conditions and uncertainty,uncertainties, such as those occasioned by a global liquidity crisis negative financial news, and a failure of large financial institutions;

 

·                 receipt of substantiallarge orders or cancellations of orders for our products;

 

·issues associated with the performance and reliability of our products;

 

·                 actual or anticipated variations in our results of operations;

 

·                 announcements of financial developments or technological innovations;

 

17



Table of Contents

·                 our failure to meet the performance estimates of investment research analysts;

 

·        ��         changes in recommendations and/or financial estimates by investment research analysts;

 

·                 strategic transactions, such as acquisitions, divestitures, or spin-offs;

·the dilutive impact of our Convertible Notes; and

 

·                 the occurrence of major catastrophic events.

 

Significant price and value fluctuations have occurred with respect to theour publicly traded securities of the Company and technology companies generally. The price of our common shares is likely to be volatile in the future. In the past, securities class action litigation often has been brought against a company following periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. If similar litigation were pursued against us, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity.

Our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our success depends upon our ability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees, including those in executive, managerial, engineering and marketing positions, as well as highly skilled and qualified technical personnel and personnel to implement and monitor our financial and managerial controls and reporting systems. Attracting, retaining, and motivating such qualified personnel may be difficult due to challenging industry conditions, competition for such personnel by other technology companies, consolidations and relocations of operations and workforce reductions. While we have entered into Employment Agreements with certain key personnel, our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

We are subject to foreign currency exchange risks.

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks that are inherent in our anticipated sales, sales commitments and assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar. Although we attempt to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, hedging activities may not always be available or adequate to eliminate, or even mitigate, the impact of our exchange rate exposure. Failure to sufficiently hedge or otherwise manage foreign currency risks properly could materially and adversely affect our revenues and gross margins.

The enforcement and protection of our intellectual property rights may be expensive and couldand/or divert our limited resources.

 

Our success depends in part upon the protection of our intellectual property rights. We rely primarily on patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret laws, as well as nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements and other methods, to protect our proprietary information, technologies, and processes. We own various United StatesU.S. and international patents and have additional pending patent applications relating to certain of our products and technologies. The process of seeking patent protection is lengthy and expensive, and we cannot be certain that pending or future applications will actually result in issued patents or that issued patents will be of sufficient scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or commercial advantage. In addition, our intellectual property rights may be circumvented, invalidated, or rendered obsolete by the rapid pace of technological change. Policingchange, or through efforts by others to reverse engineer our products or design around patents that we own. Given these limitations, our success will depend in part upon our ability to innovate ahead of our competitors.

Furthermore, policing unauthorized use of our products and technologies is difficult and time consuming. Furthermore,consuming, and the laws of other countries may less effectively protect our proprietary rights than U.S. laws. Our outsourcing strategy requires that we share certain portions of our technology with our outsourcing partners, which poses additional risks of infringement and trade secret misappropriation. Infringement of our rights by a third party, possibly for purposes of developing and selling competing products, could result in uncompensated lost market and revenue opportunities. Similar exposure could result in the event that former employees seek to compete with us through their unauthorized use of our intellectual property and proprietary information. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent the misappropriation or unauthorized use of our proprietary information and technologies, particularly in foreign countries where the laws may not protect our proprietary intellectual property rights as fully or as readily as United StatesU.S. laws. Further, we cannot be certain that the laws and policies of any country, including the United States, with respect to intellectual property enforcement or licensing will not be changed in a way detrimental to the sale or use of our products or technology.

 

18



Table of Contents

We may need to litigate to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets, or determine the validity and scope of proprietary rights of others. As a result of any such litigation, we could lose our ability to enforce one or more patents, or incur substantial unexpected operating costs.costs, and jeopardize relationships with current or prospective customers or suppliers. Any action we take to enforce our intellectual property rights could be costly and could absorb significant management time and attention, which, in turn, could negatively impact our operating results. In addition, failure to protect our trademark rights could impair our brand identity.

 

We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement by others.

 

From time to time we have received communications from other parties asserting the existence of patent or other rights which they believe cover certain of our products. We also periodically receive notice from customers who believe that we are required to indemnify them for damages they may incur related to infringement claims made against these customers by third parties. Our customary practice is to evaluate such assertions and to consider the available alternatives, including whether to seek a license, if appropriate. However, we cannot ensure that licenses can be obtained or, if obtained, will be on acceptable terms or that costly litigation or other administrative proceedings will not occur. If we are not able to resolve a claim, negotiate a settlement of the matter, obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms, and/or successfully prosecute or defend our position, our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

 

We are subject to foreign currency exchange risks.

We are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks that are inherent in our anticipated sales, sales commitments, and assets and liabilities that are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Although we attempt to mitigate our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, hedging activities may not always be available or adequate to mitigate the impact of our exchange rate exposure. Failure to sufficiently hedge or otherwise manage foreign currency risks properly could materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, and liquidity.

If we are subject to cyber-attacks we could incur substantial costs and, if such attacks are successful, we could result inincur significant liabilities, reputational harm, and disruption ofto our operations.

 

We manage, store, and transmit various proprietary information and sensitive data relating to our operations. We may be subject to breaches of the information technology systems we use for these purposes. Experienced computer programmers and hackers may be able to penetrate our network security and misappropriate and/or compromise our confidential information (and/or those of third parties,party confidential information), create system disruptions, or cause shutdowns. Computer programmers and hackers also may be able to develop and deploy viruses, worms, and other malicious software programs that attack our systems or our products, or that otherwise exploit any security vulnerabilities.

 

The costs to address the foregoing security problems and security vulnerabilities before or after a cyber-incident could be significant. Our remediation efforts may not be successful and could result in interruptions, delays, or cessation of service, and loss of existing or potential customers, that may impedeimpeding our sales, manufacturing, distribution, or other critical functions. In addition, breaches of our security measures and the unapproved dissemination of proprietary information or sensitive data about us, or our customers or other third parties, could expose us, our customers, or other third parties to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, result in litigation and potential liability for us, damage our reputation, or otherwise harm our business.

Our acquisition strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and integrating these businesses.

We have considered numerous acquisition opportunities and completed several significant acquisitions in the past. We may consider acquisitions of, or investments in, other businesses in the future. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, many of which are unpredictable and beyond our control, including:

·difficulties and increased costs in integrating the personnel, operations, technologies and products of acquired companies;

·diversion of management’s attention while evaluating, pursuing, and integrating the business to be acquired;

·potential loss of key employees of acquired companies, especially if a relocation or change in responsibilities is involved;

·difficulties in managing geographically dispersed operations in a cost-effective manner;

·lack of synergy or inability to realize expected synergies;

19



Table of Contents

·unknown, underestimated and/or undisclosed commitments or liabilities;

·increased amortization expense relating to intangible assets; and

·the potential impairment and write-down of amounts capitalized as intangible assets and goodwill as part of the acquisition, as a result of technological advancements or worse-than-expected performance by the acquired company.

Our inability to effectively manage these risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and operating results. We are subject to many of these risks in connection with our recent acquisition of Synos.

In addition, if we issue equity securities to pay for an acquisition, the ownership percentage of our then-existing shareholders would be reduced and the value of the shares held by these shareholders could be diluted, which could adversely affect the price of our stock. If we use cash to pay for an acquisition, the payment could significantly reduce the cash that would be available to fund our operations or other purposes.

We may be required to take additional impairment charges for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets or definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets.

We are required to assess goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets annually for impairment, or on an interim basis whenever certain events occur or circumstances change, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry, that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. We are also required to test our definite-lived intangible and long-lived assets, including acquired intangible assets and property, plant and equipment, for recoverability and impairment whenever there are indicators of impairment, such as an adverse change in business climate.

As part of our long-term strategy, we may pursue future acquisitions of other companies or assets which could potentially increase our goodwill and intangible and long-lived assets. Adverse changes in business conditions could materially impact our estimates of future operations and result in additional impairment charges to these assets. If our goodwill or intangible and long-lived assets were to become further impaired, our results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices may adversely affect our financial results.

Changes in accounting pronouncements or taxation rules or practices can have a significant effect on our reported results. New accounting pronouncements or taxation rules and varying interpretations of accounting pronouncements or taxation practices have occurred and may occur in the future. New rules, changes to existing rules, if any, or the questioning of current practices may adversely affect our reported financial results or change the way we conduct our business.

We are subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental, health and safety regulations.

We are subject to environmental, health and safety regulations in connection with our business operations, including but not limited to regulations related to the research, development, and use of our products. Failure or inability to comply with existing or future environmental and safety regulations could result in significant remediation liabilities, the imposition of fines and/or the suspension or termination of research, development, or use of certain of our products, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation.  In addition, some of our operations involve the storage, handling and use of hazardous materials that may pose a risk of fire, explosion, or environmental release. Such events could result from acts of terrorism, natural disasters or operational failures and may result in injury or loss of life to our employees and others, local environmental contamination and property damage. These events might cause a temporary shutdown of an affected facility, or portion thereof, and we could be subject to penalties or claims as a result. Each of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operation.

20



Table of Contents

We have significant operations in locations which could be materially and adversely impacted in the event of a natural disaster or other significant disruption.

Our operations in the U.S., the Asia-Pacific region and in other areas could be subject to natural disasters or other significant disruptions, including earthquakes, tsunamis, fires, hurricanes, floods, water shortages, other extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics, acts of terrorism, power shortages and blackouts, telecommunications failures, and other natural and manmade disasters or disruptions. In the event of such a natural disaster or other disruption, we could experience disruptions or interruptions to our operations or the operations of our suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers; destruction of facilities; and/or loss of life, all of which could materially increase our costs and expenses and materially and adversely affect our business, revenue and financial condition.

 

We have adopted certain measures that may have anti-takeover effects which may make an acquisition of our Company by another company more difficult.

 

We have adopted, and may in the future adopt, certain measures that may have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a takeover or other change in control of our Company, any of which a holder of our common stock might not consider to be in the holder’s best interest. These measures include:

 

·                 “blank check” preferred stock;

 

·                 a classified board of directors; and

 

·                 certain other certificate of incorporation and bylaws provisions.

 

Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 500,000 shares of preferred stock and to fix the rights (including voting rights), preferences, and privileges of these shares (“blank check” preferred). Such preferred stock may have rights, including economic rights, senior to our common stock. As a result, the issuance of the preferred stock could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock and could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding common stock.

 

Our board of directors is divided into three classes with each class serving a staggered three-year term. The existence of a classified board will makemakes it more difficult for our shareholders to change the composition (and therefore the policies) of our board of directors in a relatively short period of time.

 

We have adopted certain certificate of incorporation and bylaws provisions which may have anti-takeover effects. These include: (a) requiring certain actions to be taken at a meeting of shareholders rather than by written consent, (b) requiring a super-majority of shareholders to approve certain amendments to our bylaws, (c) limiting the maximum number of directors, and (d) providing that directors may be removed only for “cause.” These measures and those described above may have the effect of delaying, deferring, or preventing a takeover or other change in control of Veecoour Company that a holder of our common stock might consider to be in itsthe holder’s best interest.

 

In addition, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which prohibits a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination, including mergers and asset sales, with an interested stockholder (generally, a 15% or greater stockholder) for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. The operation of Section 203 may have anti-takeover effects, which could delay, defer, or prevent a takeover attempt that a holder of our common stock might consider to be in itsthe holder’s best interest.

Despite the above measures, an activist shareholder could undertake action to implement governance, strategic, or other changes to the Company which a holder of our common stock might not consider to be in the holder’s best interest. Such activities could interfere with our ability to execute our strategic plans, be costly and time consuming, disrupt our operations, and divert the attention of management and our employees.

 

NewWe are subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental, health, and safety regulations.

We are subject to environmental, health, and safety regulations in connection with our business operations, including but not limited to regulations related to the development, manufacture and use of our products, recycling and disposal of related materials, and the operation and use of our facilities and real property. Failure or inability to comply with existing or future environmental and safety regulations, which vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, could result in significant remediation liabilities, the imposition of fines, and/or the suspension or termination of research, development, or use of certain of our products, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, some of our operations involve the storage, handling, and use of hazardous materials that may pose a risk of fire, explosion, or environmental release. Such events could result from acts of terrorism, natural disasters, or operational failures and may result in injury or loss of life to our employees and others, local environmental contamination, and property damage. These events might cause a temporary shutdown of an affected facility, or portion thereof, and we could be subject to penalties or claims as a result. Each of these events could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Regulations related to conflict minerals will force us to incur additional expenses, and may make our supply chain more complex, and may result in damage to our relationships with customers.

 

On August 22, 2012, underUnder the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, or the Dodd-Frank Act, the SEC adopted new requirements for companies that manufacture products that contain certain minerals and metals, known as conflict minerals. These rules require public companies to perform diligence and to report annually to the SEC whether such minerals originate from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries. The implementation of

21



Table of Contents

these new requirements could adversely affect the sourcing, availability, and pricing of minerals we use in the manufacture of our products. In addition, we have incurred and will continue to incur additional costs to comply with the disclosure requirements, including costs related to determining the source of any of the relevant minerals used in our products. Given the complexity of our supply chain, we may not be able to ascertain the origins of these minerals used in our products through the due diligence procedures that we implement, which may harm our reputation. We may also face difficulties in satisfying customers who may require that our products be certified as conflict mineral free, which could harm our relationships with these customers and lead to a loss of revenue. These new requirements could limit the pool of suppliers that can provide conflict-free minerals, and we may be unable to obtain conflict-free minerals at competitive prices, which could increase our costs and adversely affect our manufacturing operations and our profitability.

 

We have significant operations in locations which could be materially and adversely impacted in the event of a natural disaster, an act of terrorism, or other significant disruption.

Our operations in the United States, the Asia-Pacific region, and in other areas could be subject to natural disasters or other significant disruptions, including earthquakes, tsunamis, fires, hurricanes, floods, water shortages, other extreme weather conditions, medical epidemics, power shortages and blackouts, telecommunications failures, and other natural and manmade disasters or disruptions. In the event of such a natural disaster or other disruption, we could experience disruptions or interruptions to our operations or the operations of our suppliers, distributors, resellers or customers, destruction of facilities, and/or loss of life, all of which could materially increase our costs and expenses and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, various regions of the world in which we do business are subject to the threat of terrorism and acts of war. Any act of terrorism or war that affects the economy or the industries in which we operate could result in significant harm to us, including the loss of life and property, manufacturing and transportation delays, disruptions in our supply chain, the need to comply with enhanced security measures, and other increased costs.

If we are unable to complete our contemplated acquisition of Ultratech, Inc., our expected financial results and the market value of our common stock could be adversely affected.

On February 2, 2017, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Ultratech, Inc. to acquire all of Ultratech’s issued and outstanding stock through a merger of Ultratech with one of our subsidiaries, Ulysses Acquisition Subsidiary Corp. (the “merger”). Consummation of the merger is subject to customary conditions to closing, including the receipt of required regulatory approvals. If any condition to the merger is not satisfied or waived, the merger will not be completed. The parties also may terminate the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances. Any or all of the preceding could jeopardize our ability to consummate the merger on the negotiated terms. To the extent the merger is not completed for any reason, we would have devoted substantial resources and management attention to the transaction without realizing the accompanying benefits expected by our management, and our financial condition and results of operations and the market value of our stock may be adversely affected. Additional risks and uncertainties associated with the merger include:

·various conditions to the closing of the merger may not be satisfied or waived;

·the inability to obtain consents from third parties who have “change of control” or similar clauses in their agreements with Ultratech;

·the failure to consummate the merger may result in negative publicity and a negative impression of us in the investment community;

·litigation relating to the merger could be commenced, which may prevent the merger from becoming effective within the expected time frame, if at all;

·required regulatory approvals from governmental entities may delay the merger or result in the imposition of conditions that could cause the abandonment of the merger; and

·the attention of our employees and management may be diverted due to activities related to the merger, which may harm our relationships with our employees, customers, distributors, suppliers, and other business partners, may impair our ability to continuously innovate to meet the industry inflections, and may result in a loss of or a substantial decrease in purchases by our customers.

Even if the Ultratech merger is consummated, we may not be able to successfully integrate the business of Ultratech with our own or realize the anticipated benefits of the merger.

The merger involves the combination of two companies that currently operate as independent public companies. The combined company will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating our business practices with those of Ultratech. Potential difficulties that the combined company may encounter as part of the integration process include the following:

·the inability to successfully combine our business with Ultratech in a manner that permits the combined company to achieve the full revenue and cost synergies and other benefits anticipated to result from the merger;

·the loss of customers and strategic partners who may not wish to continue their relationships with the combined company;

·required regulatory approvals from governmental entities may result in limitations, additional costs or placement of restrictions on the conduct of the combined company, imposition of additional material costs on or materially limiting the revenues of the combined company following the merger;

·complexities associated with managing the combined businesses, including difficulty addressing possible differences in corporate cultures and management philosophies and the challenge of integrating complex systems, technology, networks and other assets of each of the companies in a seamless manner that minimizes any adverse impact on customers, suppliers, employees and other business partners; and

·potential unknown liabilities and unforeseen increased expenses or delays associated with the merger.

In addition, we have operated and, until the completion of the merger will continue to operate, independently. It is possible that the integration process could result in the diversion of the attention of our management and the disruption of, or the loss of momentum in, our ongoing business. These and other factors could adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with customers, suppliers, employees and other partners, and our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

 

None.

 

Item 2. Properties

 

Our corporate headquarters and our principal product development and marketing, manufacturing, research and development, manufacturing, and training facilities, as well as the approximate sizesales and the segments which utilize suchservice facilities are:

 

Approximate

Owned Facilities Location

Size (sq. ft.)

Mortgaged

Use

Plainview, NY

 

80,000

 

No

 

Data Storage and Corporate HeadquartersHeadquarters; R&D; Manufacturing; Sales & Service

Somerset, NJ

 

80,000

 

No

 

LEDR&D; Manufacturing; Sales & SolarService; Administration

St. Paul, MN (1)

75,000

Yes

Building for sale

St. Paul, MN (1)

43,000

Yes

R&D; Manufacturing; Sales & Service; Administration

Somerset, NJ

 

38,000

 

No

 

LEDR&D; Sales & Solar

St. Paul, MN(1)

111,000

Yes

LED & Solar

Yongin-city, South Korea

56,000

No

Sales Office, Customer Training Center and R&D Center

Hyeongok-ri, South Korea

18,000

No

Sales Office and Clean RoomService; Administration

 

 

 

Approximate

 

Lease

 

 

Leased Facilities Location

 

Size (sq. ft.)

 

Expires

 

Use

Camarillo, CA

 

23,000

 

2015

 

Data Storage

Fort Collins, CO

 

26,000

 

2018

 

Data Storage

Peabody, MA

 

30,000

 

2014

 

Held for Sublease

Somerset, NJ

 

14,000

 

2014

 

LED & Solar

Poughkeepsie, NY

 

9,000

 

2015

 

LED & Solar

Kingston, NY

 

44,000

 

2018

 

LED & Solar

Fremont, CA

 

17,000

 

2015

 

LED & Solar

Shanghai, China (2)

 

18,700

 

2014

 

Customer Training Center

Hsinchu City, Taiwan

 

13,500

 

2015

 

Sales Office, Process Development, and Customer Training Center


(1)Our LED & Solar segment utilizes approximately 95,000 square feet of this facility. The balance is available We consolidated our business into one building, leaving the adjacent building for expansion.sale.

 

 

Approximate

 

Lease

 

 

Leased Facilities Location

 

Size (sq. ft.)

 

Expires

 

Use

Kingston, NY (2)

 

62,000

 

2018

 

Manufacturing

Somerset, NJ

 

57,000

 

2020

 

Warehouse

Horsham, PA

 

48,900

 

2024

 

R&D; Manufacturing; Sales & Service; Administration

Fremont, CA

 

25,000

 

2018

 

Sales & Service

Hillsborough, NJ (2)

 

14,000

 

2017

 

Warehouse

Hsinchu City, Taiwan

 

13,000

 

2020

 

Sales & Service; Administration

Shanghai, China

 

9,900

 

2017

 

Sales & Service; Administration

(2)We have Currently in the optionprocess of consolidating manufacturing sites and expect to renew this lease for two consecutive two year terms and also have the option to purchase this facility.vacate these locations during 2017.

 

22



Table of Contents

The St. Paul, Minnesota facility is subjectIn addition to the above, we lease a mortgage which, as of December 31, 2013, had an outstanding balance of $2.1 million. We also lease small officesoffice in Santa Clara, California and Edina, Minnesota for sales and service. Ourservice and our foreign sales and service subsidiaries lease office space in Germany, Japan,Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Philippines and China.United Kingdom. We believe our facilities are adequate to meet our current needs.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

 

Environmental

We are aware that petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has been detected in the soil at the site of a facility formerly leased by us in Santa Barbara, California. We have been indemnified for any liabilities we may incur which arise from environmental contamination at the site. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any such liabilities. The former owner of the land and building in Santa Barbara, California in which our former Metrology operations were located (which business was sold to Bruker Corporation (“Bruker”) on October 7, 2010), has disclosed that there are hazardous substances present in the ground under the building. Management believes that the comprehensive indemnification clause that was part of the purchase contract relating to the purchase of such land provides adequate protection against any environmental issues that may arise. We have provided Bruker with similar indemnification as part of the sale.

Non-Environmental

Veeco and certain other parties were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed on April 25, 2013 in the Superior Court of California, County of Sonoma. The plaintiff in the lawsuit, Patrick Colbus, seekssought unspecified damages and assertsasserted claims that he suffered burns and other injuries while he was cleaning a molecular beam epitaxy system alleged to have been manufactured by Veeco. The lawsuit alleges,alleged, among other things, that the molecular beam epitaxy system was defective and that Veeco failed to adequately warn of the potential risks of the system. Veeco believes thisIn April 2016, the parties settled the lawsuit, is without merit and intends to defend vigorously against the claims.  Veeco is unable to predict the outcomeany admission of this action or to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, arising from the claims asserted therein.wrongdoing. The Company believes that, in the event of any recovery by the plaintiff from Veeco, such recovery would besettlement amount was fully covered by Veeco’s insurance.

 

We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not Applicable.

23



Table of Contents

PART II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Our common stock is quoted on The NASDAQ NationalStock Market under the symbol “VECO.” The 20132016 and 20122015 high and low closing bid prices by quarter are as follows:

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

 

 

High

 

Low

 

High

 

Low

 

First Quarter

 

$

38.41

 

$

28.71

 

$

33.40

 

$

21.46

 

 

  $

20.64

 

  $

16.89

 

  $

35.12

 

  $

29.12

 

Second Quarter

 

42.60

 

32.23

 

36.97

 

26.54

 

 

19.72

 

15.79

 

31.89

 

28.25

 

Third Quarter

 

36.41

 

33.16

 

38.11

 

30.00

 

 

20.98

 

15.91

 

28.88

 

20.41

 

Fourth Quarter

 

38.15

 

28.44

 

31.52

 

26.89

 

 

29.95

 

19.75

 

21.83

 

18.02

 

 

On February 18, 2014,14, 2017, the closing bid price for our common stock on The NASDAQ NationalStock Market was $41.13$26.35, and we had 12083 shareholders of record.

 

We have not paid dividends on our common stock. The Board of Directors will determine future dividend policy based on our consolidated results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, and other circumstances.

 

24



TableIssuer Purchases of ContentsEquity Securities

 

On October 28, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a program to repurchase up to $100 million of our common stock to be completed through October 28, 2017. We did not repurchase any shares during the fourth quarter of 2016. At December 31, 2016, $22.3 million of the $100 million had been utilized. Repurchases are expected to be made from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. The timing and amount of future repurchases, if any, will depend upon market conditions, SEC regulations, and other factors. The repurchases would be funded using available cash balances and cash generated from operations. The program does not obligate us to acquire any particular amount of common stock and may be modified or suspended at any time at our discretion.

Stock Performance Graph

 

*$100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31.

Copyright©2017 Standard & Poor’s, a division of S&P Global. All rights reserved.

 

ASSUMES $100 INVESTED ON DEC. 31,, 2008 2011

ASSUMES DIVIDENDS REINVESTED

FISCAL YEAR ENDING DEC. 31

 

 

2008

 

2009

 

2010

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

Veeco Instruments Inc.

 

100.00

 

521.14

 

677.60

 

328.08

 

465.14

 

519.09

 

S&P Smallcap 600

 

100.00

 

125.57

 

158.60

 

160.22

 

186.37

 

263.37

 

PHLX Semiconductor

 

100.00

 

159.68

 

183.23

 

186.05

 

204.93

 

268.55

 

RDG MidCap Technology

 

100.00

 

166.67

 

214.78

 

179.75

 

177.47

 

239.71

 

25

 

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

2016

 

Veeco Instruments Inc.

 

100.00

 

141.78

 

158.22

 

167.69

 

98.85

 

140.14

 

S&P Smallcap 600

 

100.00

 

116.33

 

164.38

 

173.84

 

170.41

 

215.67

 

RDG MidCap Technology

 

100.00

 

102.28

 

160.01

 

149.09

 

138.27

 

138.23

 



Table of Contents

Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

 

The financial datainformation set forth below should be read in conjunction with the “Results of Operations” section included in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.Operations.”

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

331,749

 

$

516,020

 

$

979,135

 

$

930,892

 

$

282,262

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(71,812

)

37,212

 

276,259

 

303,253

 

7,631

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations net of income taxes

 

(42,263

)

26,529

 

190,502

 

277,176

 

(1,777

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of income taxes

 

 

4,399

 

(62,515

)

84,584

 

(13,855

)

Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest

 

 

 

 

 

(65

)

Net income (loss) attributable to Veeco

 

$

(42,263

)

$

30,928

 

$

127,987

 

$

361,760

 

$

(15,567

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per common share attributable to Veeco:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.69

 

$

4.80

 

$

7.02

 

$

(0.05

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.11

 

(1.57

)

2.14

 

(0.43

)

Income (loss)

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.80

 

$

3.23

 

$

9.16

 

$

(0.48

)

Diluted :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.68

 

$

4.63

 

$

6.52

 

$

(0.05

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.11

 

(1.52

)

1.99

 

(0.43

)

Income (loss)

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.79

 

$

3.11

 

$

8.51

 

$

(0.48

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

38,807

 

38,477

 

39,658

 

39,499

 

32,628

 

Diluted

 

38,807

 

39,051

 

41,155

 

42,514

 

32,628

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

2016(1)

 

2015(1)

 

2014(1)

 

2013

 

2012(2)

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

  $

332,451 

 

  $

477,038 

 

  $

392,873 

 

  $

331,749 

 

  $

516,020

Operating income (loss)

 

(120,402)

 

(23,232)

 

(79,209)

 

(71,812)

 

37,212

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax

 

(122,210)

 

(31,978)

 

(66,940)

 

(42,263)

 

26,529

Basic income (loss) per common share from continuing operations

 

(3.11)

 

(0.80)

 

(1.70)

 

(1.09)

 

0.69

Diluted income (loss) per common share from continuing operations

 

(3.11)

 

(0.80)

 

(1.70)

 

(1.09)

 

0.68

(1) During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company acquired PSP. The results of operations of PSP have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. Refer to Note 5, “Business Combinations,” for additional information.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2) Information presented for 2012 excludes the results of our discontinued operations.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

2009

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

(in thousands)

 

 

(in thousands)

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

210,799

 

$

384,557

 

$

217,922

 

$

245,132

 

$

148,500

 

 

  $

277,444

 

  $

269,232

 

  $

270,811

 

  $

210,799

 

  $

384,557

Short-term investments

 

281,538

 

192,234

 

273,591

 

394,180

 

135,000

 

 

66,787

 

116,050

 

120,572

 

281,538

 

192,234

Restricted cash

 

2,738

 

2,017

 

577

 

76,115

 

 

Working capital

 

485,452

 

632,197

 

587,076

 

640,139

 

317,317

 

 

357,999

 

379,904

 

387,254

 

485,452

 

632,197

Goodwill

 

91,348

 

55,828

 

55,828

 

52,003

 

52,003

 

Total assets

 

947,969

 

937,304

 

936,063

 

1,148,034

 

605,372

 

 

758,532

 

890,789

 

929,455

 

947,969

 

937,304

Long-term debt (including current installments)

 

2,137

 

2,406

 

2,654

 

104,021

 

101,176

 

Long-term debt (less current installments)

 

826

 

1,193

 

1,533

 

1,847

 

2,138

Total equity

 

780,230

 

811,212

 

760,520

 

762,512

 

359,059

 

 

594,595

 

714,615

 

738,932

 

780,230

 

811,212

26



Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Executive Summary

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Veeco”, the “Company”, “we”, “us”, and “our”, unless the context indicates otherwise) creates process equipment that enables technologies for a cleaner and more productive world. We design, manufacture, and market thin film process equipment aligned to meet the demands of key global trends such as energy conservation, mobility, and the ‘internet of things.’ Our equipment is primarily soldused to make components for electronic devices including LEDs, displays, power electronics, wireless devices, smartphones, MEMS, and hard-disk drives, as well as for concentrator photovoltaics, power semiconductors, wireless components, and micro-electro-mechanical systems (“MEMS”).

Veeco developsHDDs. We develop highly differentiated “best-in-class” process equipment for critical performance steps.steps in thin film processing. Our products featureprovide leading technology at low cost-of-ownership and high throughput.volume productivity. Core competencies in advanced thin film technologies, over 300 patents,patent protection, and decades of specialized process know-how helpshelp us to stay at the forefront of these demanding industries.rapidly advancing markets.

 

Veeco’sOur portfolio of technology solutions sell into four key market areas: Lighting, Display & Power Electronics; Advanced Packaging, MEMS & RF; Scientific & Industrial; and Data Storage.

A majority of our sales in Lighting, Display & Power Electronics were derived from customers who manufacture LEDs. Demand for LED & Solar segment designsmanufacturing equipment fluctuates quarter-to-quarter depending on various factors, including but not limited to macroeconomic conditions, customer utilization rates, demand for TVs and manufactures metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”)smartphones, and molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) systems and components sold to manufacturersthe rate of LEDs, wireless components, power semiconductors, and concentrator photovoltaics, as well asLED adoption for R&D applications.  Our ALD technology is used by the manufacturers of OLED displays and has further applicationsgeneral lighting. Starting in the semiconductorsecond half of 2015, weak LED demand for TV backlighting adversely impacted sales of our MOCVD equipment. TV demand began to improve in 2016, particularly for larger sized panels, which require more LEDs to backlight compared with smaller panel sizes. At the same time, we have seen an increase in LED demand for fine-pitch digital signage. These trends have led to increased demand for our MOCVD equipment and build-up

in our MOCVD backlog. While we have limited long-term visibility, we believe these trends are positive for MOCVD demand in the near term. Our broad portfolio of MOCVD technologies has been developed to support the most significant industry trends, including developing mid-power LEDs, utilizing larger wafer sizes, and optimizing cost-of-ownership. Our TurboDisc® EPIK700 GaN MOCVD system continues to win new business for blue LEDs. Our TurboDisc K475i AsP MOCVD system targets red-orange-yellow LEDs, laser diodes, and high-efficiency triple junction photovoltaic solar markets.cells and continues to gain market momentum.

 

Veeco’sSales into the Advanced Packaging, MEMS & RF market improved by 10% in 2016, supported by our expansion efforts in the Advanced Packaging space with our PSP product family. We continue to build positive momentum in this growing market and received orders from multiple new customers including a leading Asian OSAT supplier and a leading North American IDM. We expect to benefit as these customers invest in production capacity over the near to mid-term. Our versatile PSP product architecture is well suited for a multitude of advanced packaging process schemes, including WLFO (wafer level fan out) and 3D TSV (thru silicon via) applications.

Sales from Scientific & Industrial and Data Storage segment designs and manufactures systems used to create thin film magnetic heads (“TFMH”s) that read and write data on hard disk drives. Thesemarkets are generated primarily from our legacy products, which include our ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, and slicing, dicingMBE product families. While equipment demand from each individual market may fluctuate quarter to quarter, the diverse customer base has historically provided a relatively stable revenue stream for the company on a combined basis. In 2016, increased demand for Industrial applications such as high-power laser diodes and lapping systems. While our systems are primarily sold to hard drive customers, they also have applications inadvanced optical coatings MEMS and magnetic sensors, and extreme ultraviolet (“EUV”) lithography.offset softer demand from the Data Storage market for HDD capacity.

 

AsAgreement to Acquire Ultratech

On February 2, 2017, Veeco and Ultratech, Inc. (“Ultratech”), a leading supplier of lithography, laser-processing, and inspection systems used to manufacture semiconductor devices and LEDs, signed a definitive agreement for Veeco to acquire Ultratech. The Boards of Directors of both Veeco and Ultratech have unanimously approved the transaction.

Ultratech shareholders will receive (i) $21.75 per share in cash and (ii) 0.2675 of a share of Veeco common stock for each Ultratech common share outstanding. Based on Veeco’s closing stock price on February 1, 2017, the transaction consideration is valued at approximately $28.64 per Ultratech share. The implied total transaction value is approximately $815 million and the implied enterprise value is approximately $550 million, net of Ultratech’s net cash balance as of December 31, 2013, Veeco had approximately 800 employees2016. The transaction is expected to support our customers through product and process development, training, manufacturing, and sales and service sitesclose in the U.S., South Korea, Taiwan, China, Singapore, Japan, Europesecond calendar quarter of 2017, subject to approval by Ultratech shareholders, regulatory approvals in the United States, and other locations.

Veeco Instruments Inc. was organized as a Delaware corporation in 1989.

Summary of Results for 2013

Selected financial highlights include:

·Revenue decreased 35.7% to $331.7 million in 2013 from $516.0 million in 2012. LED & Solar revenues decreased 31.2% to $249.7 million from $363.2 million in 2012. Data Storage revenues decreased 46.3% to $82.0 million from $152.8 million in 2012;

·Orders were down 15.4%, to $331.6 million in 2013, compared to $391.9 million in 2012;

·Our gross margin decreased, to 31.1%, in 2013 compared to 41.7% in 2012. Gross margins in LED & Solar decreased from 40.9% in 2012 to 28.0%. Data Storage gross margins also decreased from 43.7% to 40.4%.

·Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased to $85.5 million, from $73.1 million in 2012. Selling, general and administrative expenses were 25.8% of net sales in 2013, compared to 14.2% in 2012;

·Our research and development expenses decreased to $81.4 million from $95.2 million in 2012. Research and development expenses were 24.5% of net sales in 2013, compared to 18.4% in 2012;

·Net income (loss) from continuing operations in 2013 was $(42.3) million compared to $26.5 million in 2012;

·Diluted net income (loss) from continuing operations per share in 2013 was $(1.09) compared to $0.68 in 2012.

27



Table of Contents

Outlook

As we begin 2014, it is unclear when business conditions may improve for Veeco.

We are seeing some positive signs in our MOCVD business.  LED customer facility utilization rates are stable and at a high level.  It is clear that LED lighting adoption is accelerating.  Some of our key customers are currently contemplating capacity additions. However, it remains difficult to accurately predict if, and when, a turnaround will happen and to what extent we will see growth in our MOCVD business. Competitive pricing pressure, which had a dramatic effect on our gross margins in 2013, is also difficult to predict.  Our focus is to introduce next-generation products that will offer our customers additional value, and that, combined with potentially higher volumes, could help restore gross margins in MOCVD.

Our new ALD business was acquired as a “pre-revenue” business and thus decreased our earnings in 2013.  The timing of production ALD orders from our key customer could have a significant impact on our expected revenue growth and potential return to profitability.

While Data Storage orders increased 8.4% from the prior year period and low growth is expected in hard drives, our customers have excess manufacturing capacity and they have only been making select technology purchases. Future demand for our Data Storage products is unclear.

Our priorities for 2014 include taking the steps we believe are necessary to transition us back to profitable growth.  We are focused on four areas to improve our financial performance: 1) developing and launching new products that enable cost effective LED lighting, flexible OLED encapsulation and other emerging technologies; 2) executing manufacturing cost reduction programs; 3) driving process improvement initiatives to make us more efficient; and 4) improving product differentiation and customer value to stem margin erosion. We currently anticipate that our losses will continue in the near term.

Our outlook discussion above constitutes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Our expectations regarding future results are subject to risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated.

You should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the dates they are made.

28



Table of Contentscustomary closing conditions.

 

Results of Operations

 

Years Ended December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

 

The following table showspresents revenue and expense line items reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations percentagesfor 2016 and 2015 and the period-over-period dollar and percentage changes for those line items. Our results of sales and comparisons between 2013 and 2012 (dollars in thousands):operations are reported as one business segment, represented by our single operating segment.

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Period to Period

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Net sales

 

 

$

332,451

 

100.0

%

$

477,038

 

100.0

%

$

(144,587

)

(30

)%

Cost of sales

 

 

199,593

 

60.0

%

299,797

 

62.8

%

(100,204

)

(33

)%

Gross profit

 

 

132,858

 

40.0

%

177,241

 

37.2

%

(44,383

)

(25

)%

Operating expenses, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

 

81,016

 

24.4

%

78,543

 

16.5

%

2,473

 

3

%

Selling, general, and administrative

 

 

77,642

 

23.4

%

90,188

 

18.9

%

(12,546

)

(14

)%

Amortization of intangible assets

 

 

19,219

 

5.8

%

27,634

 

5.8

%

(8,415

)

(30

)%

Restructuring

 

 

5,640

 

1.7

%

4,679

 

1.0

%

961

 

21

%

Asset impairment

 

 

69,520

 

20.9

%

126

 

0.0

%

69,394

 

*

 

Other, net

 

 

223

 

0.1

%

(697

)

(0.1

)%

920

 

*

 

Total operating expenses, net

 

 

253,260

 

76.2

%

200,473

 

42.0

%

52,787

 

26

%

Operating income (loss)

 

 

(120,402

)

(36.2

)%

(23,232

)

(4.9

)%

(97,170

)

*

 

Interest income (expense), net

 

 

958

 

0.3

%

586

 

0.1

%

372

 

63

%

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

 

(119,444

)

(35.9

)%

(22,646

)

(4.7

)%

(96,798

)

*

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

 

2,766

 

0.8

%

9,332

 

2.0

%

(6,566

)

70

%

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

 

$

(122,210

)

(36.8

)%

$

(31,978

)

(6.7

)%

$

(90,232

)

*

 

 

 

 

Year ended

 

Dollar and

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Percentage Change

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

331,749

 

100.0

%

$

516,020

 

100.0

%

$

(184,271

)

(35.7

)%

Cost of sales

 

228,607

 

68.9

%

300,887

 

58.3

%

(72,280

)

(24.0

)%

Gross profit

 

103,142

 

31.1

%

215,133

 

41.7

%

(111,991

)

(52.1

)%

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

85,486

 

25.8

%

73,110

 

14.2

%

12,376

 

16.9

%

Research and development

 

81,424

 

24.5

%

95,153

 

18.4

%

(13,729

)

(14.4

)%

Amortization

 

5,527

 

1.7

%

4,908

 

1.0

%

619

 

12.6

%

Restructuring

 

1,485

 

0.4

%

3,813

 

0.7

%

(2,328

)

(61.1

)%

Asset impairment

 

1,220

 

0.4

%

1,335

 

0.3

%

(115

)

(8.6

)%

Total operating expenses

 

175,142

 

52.8

%

178,319

 

34.6

%

(3,177

)

(1.8

)%

Other, net

 

(1,017

)

(0.3

)%

(398

)

(0.1

)%

(619

)

155.5

%

Changes in contingent consideration

 

829

 

0.2

%

 

0.0

%

829

 

*

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(71,812

)

(21.6

)%

37,212

 

7.2

%

(109,024

)

*

 

Interest income (expense), net

 

602

 

0.2

%

974

 

0.2

%

(372

)

(38.2

)%

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

(71,210

)

(21.5

)%

38,186

 

7.4

%

(109,396

)

*

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

(28,947

)

(8.7

)%

11,657

 

2.3

%

(40,604

)

*

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

(42,263

)

(12.7

)%

26,529

 

5.1

%

(68,792

)

*

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

 

0.0

%

6,269

 

1.2

%

(6,269

)

*

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

 

0.0

%

1,870

 

0.4

%

(1,870

)

*

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

0.0

%

4,399

 

0.9

%

(4,399

)

*

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(42,263

)

(12.7

)%

$

30,928

 

6.0

%

$

(73,191

)

*

 


* Not Meaningful

29



Table of Contents

Net Sales

 

The following is an analysis of sales by segmentmarket and by region (dollars in thousands):region:

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

 

 

Percent

 

Change

 

 

 

2013

 

of total

 

2012

 

of total

 

Year to Year

 

Segment Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

$

249,742

 

75.3

%

$

363,181

 

70.4

%

$

(113,439

)

(31.2

)%

Data Storage

 

82,007

 

24.7

%

152,839

 

29.6

%

(70,832

)

(46.3

)%

Total

 

$

331,749

 

100.0

%

$

516,020

 

100.0

%

$

(184,271

)

(35.7

)%

Regional Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia Pacific

 

$

252,199

 

76.0

%

$

390,995

 

75.8

%

$

(138,796

)

(35.5

)%

Americas (1)

 

57,609

 

17.4

%

83,317

 

16.1

%

(25,708

)

(30.9

)%

Europe, Middle East and Africa

 

21,941

 

6.6

%

41,708

 

8.1

%

(19,767

)

(47.4

)%

Total

 

$

331,749

 

100.0

%

$

516,020

 

100.0

%

$

(184,271

)

(35.7

)%


(1)Less than 1% of sales included within the Americas caption above have been derived from other regions outside the United States.

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

Change

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

Period to Period

 

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Market Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lighting, Display & Power Electronics

 

 

$

136,247

 

41.0

%

$

291,133

 

61.0

%

$

(154,886

)

(53.2

)%

Advanced Packaging, MEMS & RF

 

 

68,304

 

20.5

%

61,935

 

13.0

%

6,369

 

10.3

%

Scientific & Industrial

 

 

74,913

 

22.5

%

64,297

 

13.5

%

10,616

 

16.5

%

Data Storage

 

 

52,987

 

16.0

%

59,673

 

12.5

%

(6,686

)

(11.2

)%

Total Sales

 

 

$

332,451

 

100.0

%

$

477,038

 

100.0

%

$

(144,587

)

(30.3

)%

Regional Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

 

$

85,637

 

25.8

%

$

86,627

 

18.2

%

$

(990

)

(1.1

)%

China

 

 

85,834

 

25.8

%

242,442

 

50.8

%

(156,608

)

(64.6

)%

EMEA

 

 

83,410

 

25.1

%

64,019

 

13.4

%

19,391

 

30.3

%

Rest of World

 

 

77,570

 

23.3

%

83,950

 

17.6

%

(6,380

)

(7.6

)%

Total Sales

 

 

$

332,451

 

100.0

%

$

477,038

 

100.0

%

$

(144,587

)

(30.3

)%

 

LED & Solar segmentTotal sales decreased in 20132016 from 2015 primarily due to lower MOCVDreduced sales asin Lighting, Display & Power Electronics driven by an oversupply of LED units in the market. The decrease was partially offset by increased sales in the Scientific & Industrial and Advanced Packaging, MEMS & RF markets. Pricing was not a resultsignificant driver of continued industry manufacturing overcapacity and our customer’s hesitancy to make new investments. Data Storagethe change in total sales. By geography, sales decreased in 2013 due to customer fabrication facility overcapacity and weak hard drive demand. Our Data Storageall regions, except EMEA. The largest sales in 2012 were favorably impacted by the replacement of equipment at one of our customer’s sites thatdecline was damaged by the floods in Thailand. By region, net sales decreased in Asia Pacific (“APAC”), primarily due to a significant decrease in MOCVD sales in China, resulting from industry manufacturing overcapacity. Net saleswhich was attributable to the decline in the Americas and Europe, Middle East and Africa (“EMEA”) also decreased, due to reduced end-market demand resulting from the weak global economy.Lighting, Display & Power Electronics. We believe thatexpect there will continue to be year-to-year variations in the geographicour future sales distribution of sales.across markets and geographies.

 

OrdersBetween 2016 and 2015, orders decreased 15.4%$10.2 million, or 3%, to $331.6 million from $391.9 million$374.2 million. The decrease in the prior year,orders was primarily attributable to a 22.1%43% decrease in LEDorders in Advanced Packaging, MEMS & Solar orders, principally drivenRF as well as a 27% decrease in Data Storage. These decreases were offset by a declineincreases in MOCVD orders due to industry manufacturing overcapacity. Since hitting a peak inLighting, Display & Power Electronics and Scientific & Industrial. In the second quarterhalf of 2011, our orders have slowed dramatically.2016, we saw some improvements in LED industry conditions. While there may continue to be year-to-year variations, we also expect Data Storage orders increased 8.4% fromdemand to generally be weak as customers make limited technology purchases.

One of the prior year period and low growthperformance measures we use as a leading indicator of the business is expected in hard drives, our customers have excess manufacturing capacity and they have only been making select technology purchases. We continue to experience weak overall market conditions due to overcapacity in all of our businesses.

Ourthe book-to-bill ratio. The ratio for 2013, which is calculated by dividingdefined as orders recorded in a given time period divided by revenue recognized in the same time period,period. A ratio greater than one indicates we are adding orders faster than we are recognizing revenue. In 2016, the ratio was 1 to 11.1, a rise compared to 0.76 to 1 in 2012.2015, when it was 0.8. Our backlog as ofat December 31, 20132016 was $143.3$209.2 million, compared to $150.2 million as ofwhich was higher than the ending backlog at December 31, 2012.2015 of $186.0 million. During the year ended December 31, 2013,2016, we recorded backlog adjustments of approximately $6.8$17.9 million consistingprimarily relating to a partial cancellation of a $5.6 million adjustment related to orders that no longer met our bookings criteria as well as an adjustment related to foreign currency translation of $1.2 million.prior period customer order. For certain sales arrangements, we require a deposit for a portion of the sales price before shipment. As ofprior to manufacturing a system for a customer. At December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, we had customer deposits of $27.5$22.2 million and $32.7$28.2 million, respectively.

30



Table of Contents

Gross Profit

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

Gross profit - LED & Solar

 

$

69,998

 

$

148,383

 

$

(78,385

)

(52.8

)%

Gross margin

 

28.0

%

40.9

%

 

 

 

 

Gross profit - Data Storage

 

$

33,144

 

$

66,750

 

$

(33,606

)

(50.3

)%

Gross margin

 

40.4

%

43.7

%

 

 

 

 

Gross profit - Total Veeco

 

$

103,142

 

$

215,133

 

$

(111,991

)

(52.1

)%

Gross margin

 

31.1

%

41.7

%

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar gross marginsGross profit decreased primarilycompared to 2015 due to lower average selling prices, reducedsharp decline in sales volume and fewer final acceptances partially offset by cost reductionsimproved gross margins. Gross margins increased despite the decline in overall sales volume principally due to favorable product and region mix of sales in the period and from the benefits associated with reduced volumes and reduced expenses in 2013 for slow moving inventory items. Data Storage gross margins decreased primarily due to a significantongoing cost reduction in volume.activities.

 

Operating ExpensesResearch and development

The markets we serve are characterized by continuous technological development and product innovation, and we invest in various research and development initiatives to maintain our competitive advantage and achieve our growth objectives. R&D expenses increased in 2016 compared to 2015 as a result of a reduction in external funding used to offset the cost of R&D activities, as well as the additional use of third party contractors to accelerate the development of products for the Lighting, Display & Power Electronics market. We also incurred increased depreciation of research and development-related property, plant, and equipment. These increases were partially offset by decreased personnel-related incentive compensation. We expect our research and development expenses to decline in the future as a result of our decision to significantly reduce investments in our Atomic Layer Deposition (“ALD”) technology.

Selling, general, and administrative

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

85,486

 

$

73,110

 

$

12,376

 

16.9

%

Percentage of sales

 

25.8

%

14.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general, and administrative expenses increaseddecreased primarily from professional fees associated withdue to reductions in sales commissions, and incentive compensation as a result of the decline in our reviewfinancial performance as well as a decrease in personnel-related expenses as a result of our revenue accounting that began in 2012initiative to streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and completed in October 2013, partially offset by a reduction in bonus and profit sharing expense and increased cost control measures put into placereduce costs in response to weak market conditions, which resulted in lower personnel-related costs and discretionary expenses. The addition of our ALD business in the fourth quarter of 2013 has also contributed to an increase in our selling, general and administrative expenses.conditions.

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

Research and development

 

$

81,424

 

$

95,153

 

$

(13,729

)

(14.4

)%

Percentage of sales

 

24.5

%

18.4

%

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense

 

Research and developmentThe decrease in amortization expense decreased as we sharpened our focus on product development in areasis a result of anticipated high-growth. We selectively funded certain product development activities which resulted in reduced spending for project materials and professional consultantsthe impairment of the ALD technology asset as well as lower personnelcertain other intangible assets becoming fully amortized during the year, including the backlog and personnel-related costs.trademark/tradename assets associated with the December 2014 PSP acquisition.

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

Amortization

 

$

5,527

 

$

4,908

 

$

619

 

12.6

%

Percentage of sales

 

1.7

%

1.0

%

 

 

 

 

Restructuring expense

 

Amortization expense increased primarily dueDuring 2016, additional accruals were recognized and payments made related to previous years’ restructuring initiatives. In addition, during 2016, we undertook additional amortization associated with intangible assets acquiredrestructuring activities as part of our acquisition of Synos during the fourth quarter of 2013, partially offset by certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.

31



Table of Contents

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

Restructuring

 

$

1,485

 

$

3,813

 

$

(2,328

)

(61.1

)%

Percentage of sales

 

0.4

%

0.7

%

 

 

 

 

During 2013, we recorded $1.5 millioninitiative to streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and reduce costs. We also significantly reduced investments in personnel severance and related costs principally resulting from the transition from a direct sales presence to a distributor in one of our international sales offices and the consolidation of certain sales, business and administrative functions. During 2012, we took measures to improve profitability, including a reduction in discretionary expenses, realignment of our senior management team and consolidation of certain sales, business and administrative functions.ALD technology development. As a result of these actions, we notified approximately 75 employees of their termination and recorded a restructuring charge in 2012charges related to these actions of $5.6 million, consisting of $3.0$4.5 million inof personnel severance and related costs $0.4and $1.1 million in equity compensation and relatedof facility closing costs. Over the next year, we expect to incur additional restructuring costs and $0.4of $2 million in other severance costs resulting from a headcount reduction of 52 employees.to $5 million as we finalize these activities.

 

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

Asset impairment

 

$

1,220

 

$

1,335

 

$

(115

)

(8.6

)%

Percentage of sales

 

0.4

%

0.3

%

 

 

 

 

Asset impairment

 

During 2013,2016 we recorded non-cash asset impairment charges of $57.6 million as a result of our decision to significantly reduce future investments in LED & Solarour ALD technology development, primarily all of $0.9which related to the impairment of the intangible ALD technology asset. In addition, we recorded net non-cash impairment charges of approximately $5.7 million related to certain lab tools carried in property, plant and equipment which we are holdingassets held for sale and $0.3sale. We also recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $6.2 million related to another asset carried in Other assets. During 2012, we recorded an asset impairment charge related to a license agreement in our Data Storage segment.the

disposition of lab equipment that was no longer required.

 

Income Taxes

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

$

(28,947

)

$

11,657

 

$

(40,604

)

*

 

Effective tax rate

 

40.7

%

30.5

%

 

 

 

 


* Not Meaningful

 

The 2013 net benefit for2016 income tax expense is comprised of three components: (i) $1.9 million related primarily to U.S. tax amortization of our indefinite-lived intangible assets that is not available to offset existing deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance as well as state and local income taxes, included(ii) a $3.5$0.4 million provisiontax benefit associated with the termination of the pension plan, and (iii) $1.3 million in net tax expense related primarily to our profitable foreign operations. The 2015 income tax expense is comprised of two components: (i) $1.8 million related primarily to U.S. tax amortization of our indefinite-lived intangible assets that is not available to offset existing deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance and state and local income taxes and (ii) $7.5 million in tax expense relating to our profitable foreign operations and $32.4 million benefit relating to our domestic operations. The 2012 provision for income taxes included $8.3 million relating to our foreign operations and $3.4 million relating to our domestic operations. Our 20132016 and 2015 effective tax rate is higherdifferent than the statutory rate asprimarily due to our inability to recognize our U.S. deferred tax assets on a result of the jurisdictional mix of earnings in our foreign locations, an income tax benefit relatedmore-likely-than-not basis with respect to the generation of current year research and development tax credits and legislation enactedpre-tax U.S. operating losses in the first quarter of 2013 which extended the Federal Research and Development Credit for both the 2012 and 2013 taxthose years.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, we determined that we may not meet the criteria required to receive a certain incentive tax rate pursuant to a negotiated tax holiday in one foreign jurisdiction. Although we are continuing to negotiate the criteria for the incentive, for financial reporting purposes we have recorded additional tax provisions of $0.9 million and $4.0 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, totaling $4.9 million, which represents the cumulative effect of calculating the tax provision using the incentive tax rate as compared to the foreign country’s statutory rate. If we successfully renegotiate the incentive criteria, this additional tax provision could be reversed as a future benefit in the period in which the negotiations are finalized.

During 2012, we recorded an income tax expense of $1.9 million related to discontinued operations, with no comparable amount in 2013. In addition, we recorded a current tax benefit of $2.1 million related to equity-based compensation in 2012 for which no current tax benefit was recorded in 2013.

32



Table of Contents

Discontinued Operations

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Year to Year

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

$

 

$

6,269

 

$

(6,269

)

*

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

 

1,870

 

(1,870

)

*

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

$

 

$

4,399

 

$

(4,399

)

*

 


* Not Meaningful

Discontinued operations represent the results of the operations of our disposed Metrology segment, which was sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010, and our CIGS solar systems business, which was discontinued on September 27, 2011. The 2012 results included a $1.4 million gain ($1.1 million net of taxes) on the sale of the assets of discontinued segment held for sale and a $5.4 million gain ($4.1 million net of taxes) associated with the closing of the sale to Bruker.

33



Table of Contents

 

Years Ended December 31, 20122015 and 20112014

 

The following table showspresents revenue and expense line items reported in our Consolidated Statements of Operations percentagesfor 2015 and 2014 and the period-over-period dollar and percentage changes for those line items. Our results of sales and comparisons between 2012 and 2011 (dollars in thousands):operations are reported as one business segment, represented by our single operating segment.

 

 

 

Year ended

 

Dollar and

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Percentage Change

 

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Net sales

 

$

516,020

 

100.0

%

$

979,135

 

100.0

%

$

(463,115

)

(47.3

)%

Cost of sales

 

300,887

 

58.3

%

504,801

 

51.6

%

(203,914

)

(40.4

)%

Gross profit

 

215,133

 

41.7

%

474,334

 

48.4

%

(259,201

)

(54.6

)%

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

73,110

 

14.2

%

95,134

 

9.7

%

(22,024

)

(23.2

)%

Research and development

 

95,153

 

18.4

%

96,596

 

9.9

%

(1,443

)

(1.5

)%

Amortization

 

4,908

 

1.0

%

4,734

 

0.5

%

174

 

3.7

%

Restructuring

 

3,813

 

0.7

%

1,288

 

0.1

%

2,525

 

196.0

%

Asset impairment

 

1,335

 

0.3

%

584

 

0.1

%

751

 

128.6

%

Total operating expenses

 

178,319

 

34.6

%

198,336

 

20.3

%

(20,017

)

(10.1

)%

Other, net

 

(398

)

(0.1

)%

(261

)

(0.0

)%

(137

)

52.5

%

Operating income (loss)

 

37,212

 

7.2

%

276,259

 

28.2

%

(239,047

)

(86.5

)%

Interest income (expense), net

 

974

 

0.2

%

(824

)

(0.1

)%

1,798

 

*

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

0.0

%

(3,349

)

(0.3

)%

3,349

 

*

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

38,186

 

7.4

%

272,086

 

27.8

%

(233,900

)

(86.0

)%

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

11,657

 

2.3

%

81,584

 

8.3

%

(69,927

)

(85.7

)%

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

26,529

 

5.1

%

190,502

 

19.5

%

(163,973

)

(86.1

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

6,269

 

1.2

%

(91,885

)

(9.4

)%

98,154

 

*

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

1,870

 

0.4

%

(29,370

)

(3.0

)%

31,240

 

*

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

4,399

 

0.9

%

(62,515

)

(6.4

)%

66,914

 

*

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

30,928

 

6.0

%

$

127,987

 

13.1

%

$

(97,059

)

(75.8

)%

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

Change

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Period to Period

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Net sales

 

$

477,038

 

100.0%

 

$

392,873

 

100.0%

 

$

84,165

 

21.4%

 

Cost of sales

 

299,797

 

62.8%

 

257,991

 

65.7%

 

41,806

 

16.2%

 

Gross profit

 

177,241

 

37.2%

 

134,882

 

34.3%

 

42,359

 

31.4%

 

Operating expenses, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

78,543

 

16.5%

 

81,171

 

20.7%

 

(2,628

)

(3.2)%

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

90,188

 

18.9%

 

89,760

 

22.8%

 

428

 

0.5%

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

27,634

 

5.8%

 

13,146

 

3.3%

 

14,488

 

110.2%

 

Restructuring

 

4,679

 

1.0%

 

4,394

 

1.1%

 

285

 

6.5%

 

Asset impairment

 

126

 

0.0%

 

58,170

 

14.8%

 

(58,044

)

*  

 

Changes in contingent consideration

 

 

0.0%

 

(29,368

)

(7.5)%

 

29,368

 

*  

 

Other, net

 

(697

)

(0.1)%

 

(3,182

)

(0.8)%

 

2,485

 

78.1%

 

Total operating expenses, net

 

200,473

 

42.0%

 

214,091

 

54.5%

 

(13,618

)

(6.4)%

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(23,232

)

(4.9)%

 

(79,209

)

(20.2)%

 

55,977

 

70.7%

 

Interest income, net

 

586

 

0.1%

 

855

 

0.2%

 

(269

)

(31.5)%

 

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

(22,646

)

(4.7)%

 

(78,354

)

(19.9)%

 

55,708

 

71.1%

 

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

9,332

 

2.0%

 

(11,414

)

(2.9)%

 

20,746

 

*   

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(31,978

)

(6.7)%

 

$

(66,940

)

(17.0)%

 

$

34,962

 

52.2%

 

 


* Not Meaningfulmeaningful

34



Table of Contents

Net Sales

 

The following is an analysis of sales by segmentmarket and by region (dollars in thousands):region:

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage

 

 

 

 

 

Percent of

 

 

 

Percent of

 

Change

 

 

 

2012

 

total

 

2011

 

total

 

Year to Year

 

Segment Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

$

363,181

 

70.4

%

$

827,797

 

84.5

%

$

(464,616

)

(56.1

)%

Data Storage

 

152,839

 

29.6

%

151,338

 

15.5

%

1,501

 

1.0

%

Total

 

$

516,020

 

100.0

%

$

979,135

 

100.0

%

$

(463,115

)

(47.3

)%

Regional Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Asia Pacific

 

$

390,995

 

75.8

%

$

820,883

 

83.8

%

$

(429,888

)

(52.4

)%

Americas (1)

 

83,317

 

16.1

%

100,635

 

10.3

%

(17,318

)

(17.2

)%

Europe, Middle East and Africa

 

41,708

 

8.1

%

57,617

 

5.9

%

(15,909

)

(27.6

)%

Total

 

$

516,020

 

100.0

%

$

979,135

 

100.0

%

$

(463,115

)

(47.3

)%


(1)Less than 1%, of sales included within the United States caption above has been derived from other regions within the Americas.

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

Change

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Period to Period

 

 

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

Market Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lighting, Display & Power Electronics

 

$

291,133

 

61.0%

 

$

278,551

 

70.9%

 

$

12,582

 

4.5%

 

Advanced Packaging, MEMS & RF

 

61,935

 

13.0%

 

11,449

 

2.9%

 

50,486

 

441.0%

 

Scientific & Industrial

 

64,297

 

13.5%

 

44,429

 

11.3%

 

19,868

 

44.7%

 

Data Storage

 

59,673

 

12.5%

 

58,444

 

14.9%

 

1,229

 

2.1%

 

Total Sales

 

$

477,038

 

100.0%

 

$

392,873

 

100.0%

 

$

84,165

 

21.4%

 

Regional Analysis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

86,627

 

18.2%

 

$

44,060

 

11.2%

 

$

42,567

 

96.6%

 

China

 

242,442

 

50.8%

 

159,063

 

40.5%

 

83,379

 

52.4%

 

EMEA

 

64,019

 

13.4%

 

35,644

 

9.1%

 

28,375

 

79.6%

 

Rest of World

 

83,950

 

17.6%

 

154,106

 

39.2%

 

(70,156

)

(45.5)%

 

Total Sales

 

$

477,038

 

100.0%

 

$

392,873

 

100.0%

 

$

84,165

 

21.4%

 

 

By segment, LED & Solar sales decreased from the prior year primarily due to a 62.0% decrease in MOCVD reactor shipments as a result of industry overcapacity following over two years of strong customer investments. Data StorageTotal sales increased slightlyin 2015 from the prior year,2014 primarily due to an increase in shipmentsthe Advanced Packaging, MEMS & RF market which was primarily attributed to replace equipment destroyed by floodingthe PSP business acquired in customer facilitiesDecember 2014. Sales increases were also realized in Thailandthe other three markets. Pricing was not a significant driver of the change in total sales. By region, sales increased in China, EMEA, and the United States, partially offset by reduced demand due to our customers’ hesitancy to add manufacturing capacity during weak global economic conditions. By region, net sales decreaseddeclines in APAC, primarily due to lower MOCVD sales to LED customers. SalesRest of World, principally in the Americas and EMEA also decreased due to reduced end market demand resulting from the weak global economy.  We believe that there will continue to be year-to-year variations in the geographic distribution of sales.South Korea.

 

Orders in 2012Between 2015 and 2014, orders decreased 52.1% compared$125.6 million, or 25%, to 2011,$384.4 million. The decrease is primarily attributable to a 53.1%57% decrease in LEDorders in Lighting, Display & SolarPower Electronics as well as a 31% decrease in Data Storage. The pronounced decline in orders that were principallyand the corresponding drawdown on backlog was driven by a declineweakness in MOCVD bookingsthe LED market, which was due to industry overcapacity. After hittinglower demand for LED TV display backlighting and an economic slowdown in China. As a peakresult, LED manufacturers delayed their MOCVD equipment investments, which impacted our full year orders in the second quarter of 2011, our bookings slowed dramatically in the second half of 2011, which continued throughout 2012. Data Storage orders decreased 48.1% as strong prior year orders from hard drive customers recovering from the flood in Thailand resulted in those customers being over-invested in capacity.  In addition, the industry appears to have frozen further investments as end-user hard drive demand has slowed.Lighting, Display & Power Electronics market.

 

OurIn 2015, the book-to-bill ratio for 2012, which is calculated by dividing orders received inwas 0.8, a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period, was 0.76 to 1reduction compared to 0.84 to 1 in 2011.2014, when it was 1.3. Our backlog as ofat December 31, 20122015 was $150.2$186.0 million, compared to $332.9 million as ofwhich was lower than the ending backlog at December 31, 2011.2014 of $286.7 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012,2015, we recorded net backlog adjustments of approximately $58.5 million. The adjustments consisted of $42.0$7.7 million relatedrelating to orders that no longer met our booking criteria, primarily due to contracts being extended past a twelve month delivery time frame, and $15.4 million of order cancellations and order adjustments of $1.1 million. For certain sales arrangements we require a deposit for a portion of the sales price before shipment. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, we had customer deposits of $32.7 million and $57.1 million, respectively.

35



Table of Contentsbookings criteria.

 

Gross Profit

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Gross profit - LED & Solar

 

$

148,383

 

$

397,614

 

$

(249,231

)

(62.7

)%

Gross margin

 

40.9

%

48.0

%

 

 

 

 

Gross profit - Data Storage

 

$

66,750

 

$

76,720

 

$

(9,970

)

(13.0

)%

Gross margin

 

43.7

%

50.7

%

 

 

 

 

Gross profit - Total Veeco

 

$

215,133

 

$

474,334

 

$

(259,201

)

(54.6

)%

Gross margin

 

41.7

%

48.4

%

 

 

 

 

 

Total Veeco grossGross margins decreased primarily due to the weak business environment. As a result, we recorded a total expense for slow moving items in 2012 of approximately $9.6 million, which negatively impacted our gross margins.

LED & Solar gross margins decreased from the prior year, primarily due to a significant decrease in sales volumes, lower average selling prices and fewer final acceptances partially offset by lower plant and service spending associated with reduced volumes and cost reductions in response to lower business levels. Data Storage gross margins decreased from the prior year, primarily due to a sales mix of lower margin products. We anticipate a continuing weak business environment resulting in persistent selling price pressure in our MOCVD business.

Operating Expenses

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

73,110

 

$

95,134

 

$

(22,024

)

(23.2

)%

Percentage of sales

 

14.2

%

9.7

%

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased primarily due to lower commissions and bonus and profit sharing expenses from the reduced level of business in each of our segments. In addition our cost control measures put into place throughout the year resulting in lower personnel-related costs, travel and entertainment expense, professional consulting fees and other discretionary expenses.

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Research and development

 

$

95,153

 

$

96,596

 

$

(1,443

)

(1.5

)%

Percentage of sales

 

18.4

%

9.9

%

 

 

 

 

We continued to invest, at approximately the prior year levels, in the development of products in areas of high-growth for end market opportunities in our LED & Solar segment.

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Amortization

 

$

4,908

 

$

4,734

 

$

174

 

3.7

%

Percentage of sales

 

1.0

%

0.5

%

 

 

 

 

Amortization expense increased from the prior year primarily due to additionalour acquisition of PSP in 2015, which contributed to an increase in sales volume and an improved product mix, as well as negatively impacting 2014 gross margin for an inventory fair value step-up that was recorded in connection with the purchase accounting. Products sold into our Scientific & Industrial markets improved margins as well. Finally, $4.6 million of customer deposits were forfeited and recognized into revenue and gross profit in 2015, favorably impacting gross margin.

Selling, general, and administrative

Selling, general, and administrative expenses remained relatively consistent in 2015 as compared to 2014. Increases related to a full year of expenses associated with our PSP business which was acquired in December of 2014 were offset by decreases in third party professional fees and personnel related expenses.

Research and development

We focus our research and development on areas we anticipate to be high-growth. Research and development expenses

decreased due to reductions in personnel-related expenses largely related to the 2015 restructuring, which included closing the Hyeongok-ri, South Korea facility and reducing the workforce, including 23 employees whose positions were eliminated. We also continue to selectively fund product development activities, which has resulted in reductions in spending for project materials, and, in 2015, we received a small amount of research and development funding from a collaborative arrangement. These reductions were partially offset by an increase in spending as a result of a full year of expenses associated with our PSP business.

Amortization expense

The increase in amortization associated withexpense is related to the $79.8 million in amortizable intangible assets acquired as part of our acquisition of a privately held company duringPSP in December 2014.

Restructuring expense

In 2015, we announced the second quarterclosing of 2011, partially offset by certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized.our Hyeongok-ri, South Korea facility and reduced the workforce, including 23 employees whose positions were eliminated, resulting in additional restructuring costs. And in an effort to better align our cost structure with the recently observed weakness in the LED market, we reduced spending primarily through the reduction of 16 employees and 12 temporary staff toward the end of 2015. During 2014, we announced the closing of our Ft. Collins, Colorado and Camarillo, California facilities. Business activities formerly conducted at these sites have been transferred to our Plainview, New York facility.

Asset impairment

 

36



TableLimited asset impairment charges were observed in 2015. During 2014, based on a combination of Contentsfactors,

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Restructuring

 

$

3,813

 

$

1,288

 

$

2,525

 

196.0

%

Percentage of sales

 

0.7

%

0.1

%

 

 

 

 

During 2012,including our determination that incumbent deposition technology for flexible OLED display encapsulation had progressed to satisfy current market requirements, we took measures to improve profitability, including a reduction in discretionary expenses, realignment ofbelieved that there were sufficient indicators that required an interim asset impairment analysis on our senior management team and consolidation of certain sales, business and administrative functions.Atomic Layer Deposition (“ALD”) business. As a result of these actions,our analysis, we recorded a restructuring charge consistingnon-cash impairment charges of $3.0$28.0 million in personnel severance and related costs, $0.4 million in equity compensation and related costs and $0.4 million in other severance costs resulting from a headcount reduction of 52 employees. During 2011, we recorded $1.3 million in personnel severance and related costs related to a companywide reorganization resulting in a headcount reduction of 65 employees. These reductions in workforce included executives, management, administration, salesgoodwill and service personnel and manufacturing employees companywide.

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Asset impairment

 

$

1,335

 

$

584

 

$

751

 

128.6

%

Percentage of sales

 

0.3

%

0.1

%

 

 

 

 

During 2012, we recorded an asset impairment charge$25.9 million related to a license agreement in our Data Storage segment. During 2011, we recorded an asset impairment charge for property, plant and equipmentother long-lived assets, including $17.4 million related to the discontinuancecustomer relationships, $4.8 million related to in-process research and development, and $3.6 million related to certain tangible assets. In addition, during 2014, we recognized $4.3 million of asset impairments on tangible assets held for sale, including certain lab tools and a certain product line in our LED & Solar segment.vacant building and land.

 

Interest Income (Expense), NetChanges in Contingent Consideration

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Interest income (expense), net

 

$

974

 

$

(824

)

$

1,798

 

*

 

Percentage of sales

 

0.2

%

(0.1

)%

 

 

 

 


* Not Meaningful

 

Interest income, net for 2012 was comprisedIncluded in our agreement to acquire ALD in the fourth quarter of $2.5 million in cash interest income, partially offset by $0.2 million in cash interest expense and $1.3 million in non-cash interest expense relating2013 were performance milestones that could trigger contingent payments to net amortization of our short-term investments. Interest expense, net for 2011 was comprised of $1.4 million in cash interest expense, $1.9 million in non-cash interest expense relating to net amortization of our short-term investments and $1.3 million in non-cash interest expense relating to our convertible debt, which was retired duringthe original selling shareholders. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the first halfmilestone was achieved, and we paid the former shareholders $5.0 million and increased the estimated fair value of 2011 creatingthe remaining contingent payments by $0.8 million. During 2014, we determined that all of the remaining performance milestones were not met, reversed the fair value of the liability, and recorded a loss on extinguishmentnon-cash gain of approximately $3.3$29.4 million. Interest expense in 2011 was partially offset by $3.8 million in interest income earned on our cash and short-term investment balances. The non-cash interest expense is related to accounting rules that requires a portion of convertible debt to be allocated to equity in 2011 and accretion of debt discounts and amortization of debt premiums related to our short-term investments in 2012 and 2011.

 

37Other, net



Table

During 2014, we completed our plan to liquidate our subsidiary in Japan, since we moved to a distributor model to serve our customers in that region. As a result of Contentsthe liquidation, we reclassified a cumulative translation gain of $3.1 million from Other Comprehensive Income to “Other, net” on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Income Taxes

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

$

11,657

 

$

81,584

 

$

(69,927

)

(85.7

)%

Effective tax rate

 

30.5

%

30.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

The 2012 provision for2015 income tax expense is comprised of two components: (i) $1.8 million related primarily to U.S. tax amortization of the our indefinite-lived intangible assets that is not available to offset existing deferred tax assets and related valuation allowance as well as state and local income taxes included $8.3and (ii) $7.5 million in tax expense relating to our foreign operations and $3.4profitable non-U.S. operations. The 2014 income tax benefit included $13.4 million in tax benefits relating to our domestic operations. The 2011 provision for income taxes included $9.6U.S. operations offset by $2.0 million in tax expense relating to our foreign operations and $72.0 million relatingnon-U.S. operations. Our 2015 effective tax rate is different than the statutory rate primarily due to our domestic operations.inability to recognize our U.S. deferred tax assets on a more-likely-than-not basis with respect to current year pre-tax U.S. operating losses. Our 20122014 effective tax rate is lower than the statutory rate primarily related to a

$4.9 million tax benefit associated with our successful negotiation of an incentive tax rate in one of our non-U.S. subsidiaries, a $2.3 million reversal of uncertain tax positions as a result of concluding the jurisdictional mix2010 IRS examination, and the recognition of earnings in our foreign locations and other favorable tax benefits including the Domestic Production Activities Deduction and an adjustment for the Research and Development Credit related to the filingonly a portion of our 2011 Federal incomeU.S. deferred tax return.assets on a more-likely-than-not basis with respect to current year pre-tax operating losses. We maintain a valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets.

 

During the fourth quarter of 2012, we determined that we may not meet the criteria required to receive a certain incentive tax rate pursuant to a negotiated tax holiday in one foreign jurisdiction. Although we are continuing to negotiate the criteria for the incentive, for financial reporting purposes we have recorded an additional tax provision of $4.0 million which represents the cumulative effect of calculating the tax provision using the incentive tax rate as compared to the foreign country’s statutory rate. As such amount is not expected to be paid within twelve months, we have recorded the $4.0 million as a long term taxes payable. If we successfully renegotiate the incentive criteria, this additional tax provision could be reversed as a future benefit in the period in which the successful negotiations are finalized.

During 2012, we recorded an income tax expense of $1.9 million related to discontinued operations compared to the $29.4 million income tax benefit from discontinued operations in the prior year which was reported in accordance with the intraperiod tax allocation provisions. In addition, we recorded a current tax benefit of $2.1 million related to equity-based compensation which was a credit to additional paid in capital compared to $10.4 million tax benefit recorded in the prior year.

Discontinued Operations

 

 

Year ended

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Dollar and Percentage Change

 

(dollars in thousands)

 

2012

 

2011

 

Year to Year

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

$

6,269

 

$

(91,885

)

$

98,154

 

*

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

1,870

 

(29,370

)

31,240

 

*

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

$

4,399

 

$

(62,515

)

$

66,914

 

*

 


* Not Meaningful

Discontinued operations represent the results of the operations of our disposed Metrology segment, which was sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010, and our CIGS solar systems business, which was discontinued on September 27, 2011, reported as discontinued operations. The 2012 results included a $1.4 million gain ($1.1 million net of taxes) on the sale of the assets of discontinued segment held for sale and a $5.4 million gain ($4.1 million net of taxes) associated with the closing of the China Assets with Bruker. The 2011 results reflect an operational loss before taxes of $1.6 million related to the Metrology segment and an operational loss before taxes of $90.3 million related to the CIGS solar systems business.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

AsOur cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and restricted cash are as follows:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

277,444

 

$

269,232

 

Short-term investments

 

66,787

 

116,050

 

Total

 

$

344,231

 

$

385,282

 

A portion of our cash and cash equivalents is held by our subsidiaries throughout the world, frequently in each subsidiary’s respective functional currency, which is typically the U.S. dollar. At December 31, 20132016 and 2012, we had2015, cash and cash equivalents of $210.8$149.2 million and $384.6 million, respectively, of which $150.6 million and $128.0$135.3 million, respectively, were held outside the United States. Liquidity is affected by many factors, some of which are based on normal ongoing operations of our business and some of which arise from fluctuations relatedIn order to global economics and markets. Cash balances are generated and held in many locations throughout the world. Itfund continued international growth, it is our current intentintention to permanently reinvest our funds from Singapore,the cash and cash equivalent balances held in China, Taiwan, South Korea, and Malaysia, outside of the United States and our current plansforecasts do not demonstrate a needrequire repatriation of these funds back to repatriate them to fund ourthe United States operations. As ofStates. At December 31, 2013,2016, we had $115.0$80.2 million in cash held offshoreoutside the United States on which we wouldmay have to pay significant United StatesU.S. income taxes to repatriate in the event that we need the funds for our operations in the United

38



Table of Contents

States.repatriate. Additionally, local government regulations may restrict our ability to move cash balances to meet cash needs under certain circumstances. We currently do not expect such regulations and restrictions to impact our ability to make acquisitions, pay vendors, or conduct operations throughout the global organization. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, in addition to our cash balances, we also had short-term investments in the United States of $281.5 million and $192.2 million, respectively, and restricted cash in Germany of $2.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively.operations. We believe that our projected cash flow from operations, combined with our cash and short term investments, will be sufficient to meet our projected working capital requirements, contractual obligations, and other cash flow requirementsneeds for the next twelve months, as well asincluding scheduled interest payments on our contractual obligations.Convertible Notes issued in January 2017.

 

A summary of the cash flow activity for the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 is as follows (in thousands):follows:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(42,263

)

$

30,928

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

727

 

111,963

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(168,056

)

48,321

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(5,766

)

5,555

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(663

)

796

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(173,758

)

166,635

 

Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of year

 

384,557

 

217,922

 

Cash and cash equivalents as of end of year

 

$

210,799

 

$

384,557

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(122,210

)

$

(31,978

)

Non-cash items:

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

32,650

 

39,850

 

Deferred income taxes

 

940

 

2,648

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

15,741

 

17,986

 

Asset impairment

 

69,520

 

126

 

Other

 

(259

)

(1,218

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

 

(20,226

)

(11,625

)

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

$

(23,844

)

$

15,789

 

 

During 2013, we continuedNet cash used in operating activities was $23.8 million in 2016 and was due to generatethe net loss of $122.2 million plus a decline in cash flow from operations despite the $184.3operating activities due to changes in operating assets and liabilities of $20.2 million, partially offset by adjustments for non-cash items of $118.6 million. The changes in operating assets and liabilities was largely attributable to a decrease in revenues. Cashaccounts payable and accrued expenses, an increase in accounts receivable, and an increase in inventories and deferred cost of sales, partially offset by a decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets and an increase in customer deposits and deferred revenue.

Net cash provided by operations declined primarilyoperating activities was $15.8 million in 2015 and was due to a $73.2 million reduction in net income, generating athe net loss of $32.0 million plus

adjustments for 2013.non-cash items of $59.4 million, offset by a decline in cash flow from operating activities due to changes in operating assets and liabilities of $11.6 million. The net loss for 2013 included $22.5 million of noncash items. A $38.8 millionchanges in operating assets and liabilities was largely attributable to an increase in inventory and a decrease in customer deposits and deferred revenue, offset by a decrease in accounts receivable and $7.5 millionan increase in accounts payable contributed most significantly to ourand accrued expenses.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(68

)

Capital expenditures

 

 

(11,479

)

 

 

(13,887

)

Changes in investments, net

 

 

48,907

 

 

 

4,403

 

Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment

 

 

9,512

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of lab tools

 

 

 

 

 

3,068

 

Other

 

 

(230

)

 

 

(594

)

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

 

$

46,710

 

 

 

$

(7,078

)

The cash provided from operations. Thisby investing activities in 2016 was primarily attributable to net changes in investments and sales of property, plant, and equipment, partially offset by a $17.3 million reduction of accrued expenses, customer deposits and deferred revenue and a $12.6 million increase in income taxes receivable, primarily resulting from a net operating loss carryback claim.

Netcapital expenditures. The cash fromused by investing activities in 2013 declined2015 was primarily attributable to capital expenditures, partially offset by $216.4net sales of marketable securities and sales of lab tools. As part of our efforts to streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and reduce costs, we are making certain investments in our facilities to support the consolidation activities, and, in 2017, we expect to incur capital expenditures related to these activities of $9 million compared to the prior year. $11 million above our annual average capital spending.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Settlement of equity awards, net of withholding taxes

 

$

(945

)

$

(982

)

Purchases of common stock

 

(13,349

)

(8,907

)

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(340

)

(314

)

Net cash used in financing activities

 

$

(14,634

)

$

(10,203

)

The cash used in investing activities was primarily driven by our acquisition of Synos, which consumed $71.5 million and the $89.3 million increase in short-term investments. This was partially offset by a $15.8 million reduction in capital expenditures from the prior year.

Net cash from financing activities in 2013 declined by $11.3 million compared to the prior year. This change resultsfor both 2016 and 2015 was primarily from a $5.0 million payment of a contingent consideration milestone made in accordance with the terms of our agreement to purchase Synos and a change of $6.3 million related to option and restricted stock activity, including tax impacts.

On October 1, 2013, we acquired Synos for an initial purchase price of $71.5 million. Synos develops atomic layer deposition technology. As a result of this purchase, we acquired $99.3 million of definite-lived intangibles, of which $78.2 million is related to core technology, and $35.5 million of goodwill. The financial results of this acquisition are included in our LED & Solar segment as of the acquisition date. As of October 1, 2013, we had a contingent obligation to pay up to an additional $115.0 million if certain conditions are met. The first $5.0 million of the $115.0 million was earned and paid in the fourth quarter of 2013.  Up to $35.0 million of the remaining contingent obligation could be payable in the first quarter of 2014, if the conditions related to earning the payments are met. The remaining $75.0 million contingent consideration could be payable in 2015 if the conditions related to earning the payments are met. As part of the purchase price allocation, we recorded a liability of $33.5 million related to the fair valueshare repurchase program, which commenced in November 2015.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We have commitments under certain contractual arrangements to make future payments for goods and services. These contractual arrangements secure the rights to various assets and services to be used in the future in the normal course of business. We expect to fund these contractual arrangements with cash generated from operations in the contingent consideration.normal course of business.

 

39The following table summarizes our contractual arrangements at December 31, 2016 and the timing and effect that those commitments are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods. The effect of unrecognized tax benefits, which total $5.4 million at December 31, 2016, have been excluded from the table since we are unable to reasonably estimate the period of potential cash settlement, if any, with the respective tax authorities.



Table of Contents

 

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

1 – 3

 

3 – 5

 

More than

 

 

 

 

Total

 

1 year

 

years

 

years

 

5 years

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Long-term debt

 

$

1,194

 

$

368

 

$

826

 

$

 

$

 

Interest on debt

 

151

 

81

 

70

 

 

 

Operating leases

 

13,873

 

3,281

 

4,192

 

2,795

 

3,605

 

Bank guarantees

 

4,970

 

4,970

 

 

 

 

Purchase commitments(1)

 

72,627

 

72,627

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

92,815

 

$

81,327

 

$

5,088

 

$

2,795

 

$

3,605

 

 

As of December 31, 2013, our contractual cash obligations and commitments are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

 

 

 

 

More than 5

 

 

 

Total

 

1 year

 

1-3 years

 

3-5 years

 

years

 

Long-term debt (1)

 

$

2,137

 

$

290

 

$

654

 

$

766

 

$

427

 

Interest on debt (1)

 

553

 

159

 

244

 

132

 

18

 

Operating leases (2)

 

8,082

 

3,076

 

3,418

 

1,588

 

 

Letters of credit and bank guarantees (3)

 

6,493

 

6,493

 

 

 

 

Purchase commitments (4)

 

60,290

 

60,290

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

77,555

 

$

70,308

 

$

4,316

 

$

2,486

 

$

445

 


(1)Long-term debt obligations consist of mortgage and interest payments for our St. Paul, MN facility.

(2)In accordance with relevant accounting guidance, we account for our office leases as operating leases with expiration dates ranging from 2014 through 2018, excluding renewal options. There are future minimum annual rental payments required under the leases. Leasehold improvements made at the beginning of or during a lease are amortized over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the assets. This also includes other operating leases we hold, such as cars, apartments and office equipment. There are no material sublease payments receivable associated with the leases.

(3)Issued by a bank on our behalf as needed. We had letters of credit outstanding of $0.6 million and bank guarantees outstanding of $5.9 million, of which, $2.7 million is collateralized against cash that is restricted from use. As of December 31, 2013, we had $40.4 million of unused lines of credit available. The line of credit is available to draw upon to cover performance bonds as required by our customers.

(4)                Purchase commitments are primarily for inventory used in manufacturing our products. It has been our practiceWe generally do not to enter into purchase commitments extending beyond one year. We have $9.4$7.8 million of offsetting supplier deposits against these purchase commitments as of December 31, 2013.2016.

New Convertible Notes

In January 2017, we issued $345.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.70% convertible senior unsecured notes due 2023 (the “Convertible Notes”) pursuant to an indenture dated as of January 18, 2017 between Veeco and U.S. Bank National Association, as the trustee (the “Offering”). We received net proceeds from the Offering, after deducting fees and expenses payable by us, of approximately $336.0 million. The Convertible Notes bear interest payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2017. We believe that we have sufficient capital resources and cash flows from operations to support scheduled interest payments on this debt.

Agreement to Acquire Ultratech

As described above, on February 2, 2017, Veeco and Ultratech signed a definitive agreement for Veeco to acquire Ultratech. We believe that we have sufficient capital resources and cash flows from operations to support the purchase of Ultratech.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources other than operating leases, letters of credit and bank guarantees, and purchase commitments disclosed in the preceding “Contractual Cash Obligations and Commitments” table.

40



Table of Contents

 

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

 

General:Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to makerequire a high degree of judgment, either in the application and interpretation of existing accounting literature or in the development of estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Management continually monitors and evaluates itsOn an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible and other long-lived assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring costs, and contingent liabilities, including potential litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgmentsbased on historical experience and on variousas well as other factors that are believedwe believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, thecircumstances. The results of whichour evaluation form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. ActualThese estimates may change in the future if underlying assumptions or factors change, and actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. estimates.

We consider certainthe following significant accounting policies related to revenue recognition, short-term investments, the valuation of inventories, the impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the impairment of long-lived assets, accounting for acquisitions, fair value measurements, warranty costs, income taxes and equity-based compensation to be critical policies due tobecause of their complexity and the estimation processeshigh degree of judgment involved in each.  We have reclassified certain amounts previously reported in our financial statements to conform to the current presentation, including amounts related to discontinued operations.implementing them.

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue Recognition:We recognize revenue when all of the following criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, with a customer; delivery of the specified products has occurred or services have been rendered; prices are contractuallyrendered, the selling price is fixed or determinable; anddeterminable, collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recorded including shippingassured, and, handling costs and excluding applicable taxes related to sales. A significant portionfor system sales, we have received customer acceptance or we have otherwise objectively demonstrated that the delivered system meets all of our revenue is derivedthe agreed-to customer specifications. Each sales arrangement may contain commercial terms that differ from contractual arrangements with customers that have multiple elements, such as systems, upgrades, components, spare parts, maintenance and service plans. For sales arrangementsother arrangements. In addition, we frequently enter into contracts that contain multiple elements,deliverables. Judgment is required to properly identify the accounting units of the multiple deliverable transactions and to determine the manner in which revenue should be allocated among the accounting units. Moreover, judgment is used in interpreting the commercial terms and determining when all criteria have been met in order to recognize revenue in the appropriate accounting period. The maximum revenue we splitrecognize on a delivered element is limited to the arrangement into separateamount that is not contingent upon the delivery of additional items. While changes in the allocation of the estimated sales price between the units of accounting ifwill not affect the individually delivered elements have value to the customer onamount of total revenue recognized for a standalone basis. We also evaluate whether multiple transactions with the same customer or related party should be considered part of a multiple elementparticular sales arrangement, whereby we assess, among other factors, whether the contracts or agreements are negotiated or executed within a short time frame of each other or if there are indicators that the contracts are negotiatedany material changes in contemplation of each other. When we have separate units of accounting, we allocate revenue to each element based on the following selling price hierarchy: vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available; third party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available; or our best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available.  We utilize BESP for the majority of the elements in our arrangements. The accounting guidance for selling price hierarchy did not include BESP for arrangements entered into prior to January 1, 2011, and as such we recognized revenue for those arrangements as described below.

We consider many facts when evaluating each of our sales arrangements to determinethese allocations could impact the timing of revenue recognition, including the contractual obligations, the customer’s creditworthinesswhich could have a material effect on our financial condition and the natureresults of the customer’s post-delivery acceptance provisions.  Our system sales arrangements, including certain upgrades,operations. We generally include field acceptance provisions that may include functional or mechanical test procedures. For the majority of our arrangements, a customer source inspection of the system is performed in our facility or test data is sent to the customer documenting that the system is functioning to the agreed upon specifications prior to delivery. Historically, such source inspection or test data replicates the field acceptance provisions that will be performed at the customer’s site prior to final acceptance of the system. As such, we objectively demonstrate that the criteria specified in the contractual acceptance provisions are achieved prior to delivery and, therefore, we recognize revenue upon delivery since there is no substantive contingency remaining related to the acceptance provisions at that date, subject to the retention amount constraint described below.  For new products, new applicationssales of existing products or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where we cannot objectively demonstrate that the criteria specified in the contractual acceptance provisions have been achieved prior to delivery,components and spare parts upon shipment. We generally recognize revenue and the associated costs are deferred and fully recognized upon the receipt of final customer acceptance, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

Our system sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally do not contain provisions for right of return or forfeiture, refund, or other purchase price concessions. In the rare instances where such provisions are included, we defer all revenue until such rights expire. In many cases our products are sold with a billing retention, typically 10% of the sales price (the “retention amount”), which is typically payable by the customer when field acceptance provisions are completed. The amount of revenue recognized upon delivery of a system or upgrade, if any, is limited to the lower of i) the amount billed that is not contingent upon acceptance provisions or ii) the value of the arrangement consideration allocated to the delivered elements, if such sale is part of a multiple-element arrangement.

41



Table of Contents

For transactions entered into prior to January 1, 2011, under the accounting rules for multiple-element arrangements in place at that time, we deferred the greater of the retention amount or the relative fair value of the undelivered elements based on VSOE.  When we could not establish VSOE or TPE for all undelivered elements of an arrangement, revenue on the entire arrangement was deferred until the earlier of the point when we did have VSOE for all undelivered elements or the delivery of all elements of the arrangement.

Our sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally include installation. The installation process is not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment since it is not complex; that is, it does not require significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building elaborate interfaces or connections subsequent to factory acceptance. We have a demonstrated history of consistently completing installations in a timely manner and can reliably estimate the costs of such activities. Most customers engage us to perform the installation services, although there are other third-party providers with sufficient knowledge who could complete these services. Based on these factors, we deem the installation of our systems to be inconsequential or perfunctory relative to the system as a whole, and as a result, do not consider such services to be a separate element of the arrangement. As such, we accrue the cost of the installation at the time of revenue recognition for the system.

In Japan, where our contractual terms with customers generally specify title and risk and rewards of ownership transfer upon customer acceptance, revenue is recognized and the customer is billed upon the receipt of written customer acceptance. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we began using a distributor for almost all of our product and service sales to customers in Japan. Title and risk and rewards of ownership of our system sales still transfer to our end-customers upon their acceptance.  As such, there is no impact to our policy of recognizing revenue upon receipt of written acceptance from the end customer.

Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the applicable contract term. Component and spare part revenue are recognized atSee Note 1, “Significant Accounting Policies,” in the time of delivery in accordance withNotes to the terms of the applicable sales arrangement.

Short-Term Investments: We determine the appropriate balance sheet classificationConsolidated Financial Statements for a description of our investments at the time of purchase and evaluate the classification at each balance sheet date. As part of our cash management program, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities which are classified as available-for-sale. These securities include U.S. treasuries and government agency securities with maturities of greater than three months. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income (loss) and reported in equity. Net realized gains and losses are included in net income (loss).revenue recognition policy.

 

Inventory Valuation:Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principallyor net realizable value using standard costs that approximate actual costs on a first-in, first-out method) or market.  On a quarterly basis, management assessesbasis. Each quarter we assess the valuation and recoverability of all inventories, classified asinventories: materials (which include raw(raw materials, spare parts, and service inventory), work-in-process; work-in-process; and finished goods.

Materials Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of our estimated usage requirements is used primarilywritten down to support the installed tool baseits estimated net realizable value if less than cost. We evaluate usage requirements by analyzing historical and spare parts salesanticipated demand, and anticipated demand is reviewed for excess quantities or obsolescence by comparing on-hand balances to historical usage, and adjusted forestimated based upon current economic conditions, utilization requirements related to current backlog, current sales trends, and other qualitative factors. Historically, the variability of such estimates has been impacted by customer demand and tool utilization rates.

The work-in-process and finished goods inventory is principally used to support system sales and is reviewed for recoverability by considering whether on hand inventory would be utilized to fulfill the related backlog. As we typically receive deposits for our orders, the variability of this estimate is reduced as customers have a vested interest in the orders they place with us. Recoverability of such inventory is evaluated by monitoring customer demand, current sales trends and product gross margins.  Management also considers qualitative factors such as future product demand based on market outlook, which is based principally upon production requirements resulting from customer purchase orders received with a customer-confirmed shipment date within the next twelve months.  Historically, the variability of these estimates of future product demand has been impacted by backlog cancellations or modifications resulting from unanticipated changes in technology or customer demand.

42



Table of Contents

Following identification of potential excess or obsolete inventory, management evaluates the need to write down inventory balances to its estimated market value, if less than its cost.  Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses, and ultimate realization of potential excess inventory.  Unanticipated changes in demand for our products may require a write down of inventory that could materially affect our operating results.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment:  Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired.  We account for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives in accordance with relevant accounting guidance related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which states that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level.  Our policy is to perform this annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, using a measurement date of October 1st, of each fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets.

The guidance provides an option for an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.

If we determine the two-step impairment test is necessary, we are required to determine if it is appropriate to use the operating segment, as defined under guidance for segment reporting, as the reporting unit, or one level below the operating segment, depending on whether certain criteria are met. We have identified five reporting units that are required to be reviewed for impairment. The five reporting units are aggregated into two segments: the VIBE and Mechanical reporting units which are reported in our Data Storage segment; and the MOCVD, MBE and ALD reporting units which are reported in our LED & Solar segment. In identifying the reporting units management considered the economic characteristics of operating segments including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution.

We perform this impairment test by first comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their respective carrying amount. When determining the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, we utilize a discounted future cash flow approach since reported quoted market prices are not available for our reporting units. Developing the estimate of the discounted future cash flow requires significant judgment and projections of future financial performance. The key assumptions used in developing the discounted future cash flows are the projection of future revenues and expenses, working capital requirements, residual growth rates and the weighted average cost of capital. In developing our financial projections, we consider historical data, current internal estimates and market growth trends. Changes to any of these assumptions could materially change the fair value of the reporting unit. We reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our adjusted market capitalization as a supporting calculation. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.

If the carrying value of the reporting units exceed the fair value we would then compare the implied fair value of our goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.

Definite-Lived Intangible and Long-Lived Assets:  Definite-lived intangible assets consist of purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, software licenses and deferred financing costs. Purchased technology consists of the core proprietary manufacturing technologies associated with the products and offerings obtained through acquisition and are initially recorded at fair value. Customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete and software licenses that are obtained in an acquisition are initially recorded at fair value. Other software licenses and deferred financing costs are initially recorded at cost. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives for periods ranging from 2 years to 17 years.

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

43



Table of Contents

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets with definite useful lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Accounting for Acquisitions:  Our growth strategy has included the acquisition of businesses. The purchase price of these acquisitions has been determined after due diligence of the acquired business, market research, strategic planning, and the forecasting of expected future results and synergies. Estimated future results and expected synergies are subject to judgment as we integrate each acquisition and attempt to leverage resources.

The accounting for the acquisitions we have made requires that the assets and liabilities acquired, as well as any contingent consideration that may be part of the agreement, be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. This requires management to make significant estimates in determining the fair values, especially with respect to intangible assets, including estimates of expected cash flows, expected cost savings and the appropriate weighted average cost of capital. As a result of these significant judgments to be made we often obtain the assistance of independent valuation firms. We complete these assessments as soon as practical after the closing dates. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill

Fair Value Measurements: Accounting guidance requires that we disclose the type of inputs we use to value our assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value, based on three categories of inputs as defined in such. Level 1 inputs are quoted, unadjusted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access at the measurement date. Level 2 inputs are other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date. These requirements apply to our long-lived assets, goodwill, cost method investment and intangible assets. We use Level 3 inputs to value all of such assets. We primarily apply the market approach for recurring fair value measurements.

 

Warranty Costs:Costs

Our warranties are typically valid for one year from the date of final acceptance. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we provide and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. Our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is tested for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter of our fiscal year. We may first perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, and, if so, we then apply the two-step impairment test. The two-step impairment test first compares the fair value of our reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is not impaired and we are not required to perform further testing. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, we determine the implied fair value of the goodwill and if the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then we record an impairment loss equal to the difference.

We determine the fair value of our reporting unit based on a reconciliation of the aggregate fair value of our reporting unit to our adjusted market capitalization. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.

The carrying values of identifiable intangible assets are reviewed for recoverability on a quarterly basis. The facts and circumstances considered include the recoverability of the cost of other intangible assets from future undiscounted cash flows to be derived from the use of the asset or asset group. It is not possible for us to predict the likelihood of any possible future impairments or, if such an impairment were to occur, the magnitude of any impairment.

Intangible assets with finite useful lives, including purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, and software licenses, are subject to amortization over the expected period of economic benefit to us. We evaluate whether events or circumstances have occurred that warrant a revision to the remaining useful lives of intangible assets. In cases where a revision is deemed appropriate, the remaining carrying amounts of the intangible assets are amortized over the revised remaining useful life.

Accounting for Business Combinations

The allocation of the purchase price for acquisitions requires extensive use of accounting estimates and judgments to allocate the purchase price to the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired, including in-process research and development and liabilities assumed based on their respective fair values. The estimates we make include expected cash flows, expected cost savings, and the appropriate weighted average cost of capital. We complete these assessments as soon as practical after the acquisition closing dates. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The measurement of fair value for our financial instruments is based on the authoritative guidance which establishes a fair value hierarchy that is based on three levels of inputs and requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. See Note 3, “Fair Value Measurements,” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

 

Income Taxes:Taxes

We are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimatingDeferred income taxes reflect the actual currentnet tax expense, together with assessingeffect of temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is adjusted by a partial valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. Our net deferred tax assets consist primarily of tax credit carry forwards and timing differences between the bookasset and liability balances recognized for financial reporting purposes and the balances used for income tax treatmentpurposes, as well as the tax effect of inventory, acquired intangible assets and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income.

44



Table of Contents

carry forwards. We record a valuation allowances in orderallowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, we consider a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under the relevant accounting guidance, factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

Relevant accounting guidance addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under such guidance, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if itthat is more likely than not thatto be realized. Realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent on future taxable income.

We recognize the effect of income tax position willpositions for only those positions which are estimated to more likely than not be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognizedif challenged. We reflect changes in recognition or measurement in the financial statements from suchperiod in which our change in judgment occurs. We record interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.in income tax expense.

 

Equity-Based Compensation: Accounting for Share-Based CompensationWe grant equity-based awards, such as stock options and restricted stock or restricted stock units, to certain key employees to create a clear and meaningful alignment between compensation and shareholder return and to enable the employees to develop and maintain a stock ownership position. While the majority of our equity awards feature time-based vesting, performance-based equity awards, which are awarded from time to time to certain key Company executives, vest as a function of performance, and may also be subject to the recipient’s continued employment which also acts as a significant retention incentive.

 

Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date,We account for share-based awards granted to employees for services based on the fair value of those awards. We use the award and is recognized as expense overBlack-Scholes option-pricing model to compute the employee requisite service period. In order to determine theestimated fair value of option awards and purchase rights under the employee stock options on the date of grant, we apply thepurchase plan. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model areincludes assumptions related toregarding expected volatility, expected term, and risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock-price volatility and option life.

The risk-free rate assumed in valuing the options isrates. These assumptions reflect our best estimates, but these items involve uncertainties based on the U.S. Treasury yield curvemarket and other conditions outside of our control. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, share-based compensation expense could have been materially affected. Furthermore, if different assumptions are used in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. The dividend yield assumption is based on our historical and future expectation of dividend payouts. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on objective data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates.periods, share-based compensation expense could be materially affected in future years.

 

We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combinationhave granted performance share awards to senior executives where the number and, in some instances, the timing of both historical volatility calculated basedthe vesting of restricted shares ultimately received by the senior executives depends on the daily closing prices of our common stock over a period equal toperformance, as measured against specified targets. We reevaluate the expected term oftarget achievement each reporting period until the option and implied volatility, and utilization of market data of actively traded options on our common stock, which are obtained from public data sources. We believe that the historical volatility of the price of our common stock over the expected term of the option is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility and that implied volatility takes into consideration market expectations of how future volatility will differ from historical volatility. Accordingly, we believe a combination of both historical and implied volatility provides the best estimate of the future volatility of the market price of our common stock.

The expected option term, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated using a lattice-based model incorporating historical post vest exercise and employee termination behavior.

We estimate forfeitures using our historical experience, which is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Because of the significant amount of judgment used in these calculations, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change.

With regard to the weighted-average option life assumption, we consider the exercise behavior of past grants and model the pattern of aggregate exercises.

We settle the exercise of stock options with newly issued shares.

With respect to grants of performance based awards, we assess the probability that such performance criteria will be met in order to determine the compensation expense. Consequently, the compensation expense is recognized straight-line over the vesting period. If that assessment of the probabilityconclusion of the performance condition being met changes, we wouldperiod and recognize the impact of theany change in estimate in the period of the change. As with the use of any estimate, and owing to the significant judgment used to derive those estimates, actual results may vary.

 

45In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09: Stock Compensation: Improvements to

Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting



Table, which simplifies several aspects of Contentsthe accounting for share-based payments. We early adopted the ASU effective January 1, 2016. Beginning in 2016, excess tax benefits and deficiencies are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the reporting period incurred. We also made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures when they occur. The ASU transition guidance requires that this election be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period in which the ASU is effective. Accordingly, we recorded a $1.3 million charge to the opening accumulated deficit balance with a corresponding adjustment to additional paid-in capital, resulting in no impact to the opening balance of total stockholders’ equity. In addition, we recorded additional deferred tax assets with an equally offsetting valuation allowance of $2.4 million.

 

We have elected to treat awards with only service conditions and with graded vesting as one award. Consequently, the total compensation expense is recognized straight-line over the entire vesting period, so long as the compensation cost recognized at any date at least equals the portion of the grant date fair value of the award that is vested at that date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

The FASB issued ASU 2014-09, as amended: PresentationRevenue from Contracts with Customers, which has been codified as Accounting Standards Codification 606 (“ASC 606”). ASC 606 requires our revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an Unrecognized Tax Benefit Whenamount that reflects the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 outlines a Net Operating Loss Carryforward,five-step model to make the revenue recognition determination and requires new financial statement disclosures. Publicly-traded companies are required to adopt ASC 606 for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, but can adopt early for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are still completing our evaluation of the impact of adopting this standard; however, we currently expect the most significant financial statement impacts of adopting ASC 606 will be the elimination of the constraint on revenue associated with the billing retention related to the receipt of customer final acceptance as well as the identification of installation services as a Similar Tax Loss, or Tax Credit Carryforward Exists:performance obligation. The elimination of the constraint on revenue related to customer final acceptance, which is usually about 10 percent of a system sale, will generally be recognized at the time we transfer control of the system to the customer, which is earlier than under our current revenue recognition model. The new performance obligation related to installation services under the new standard will generally be recognized as the installation services are performed, which is later than under our current revenue recognition model. Taken together, we currently believe there will be a net acceleration of a small percentage of our revenue under ASC 606 as compared to our current revenue recognition model. ASC 606 provides for different transition alternatives, and we are evaluating which method of adoption to select.

In July 2013,January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11,2016-01: PresentationFinancial Instruments — Overall, which requires certain equity investments to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized in net income. Publicly-traded companies are required to adopt the update for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is permitted. We don’t expect this ASU will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02: Leases, which generally requires our operating lessee rights and obligations to be recognized as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. In addition, interest on lease liabilities is to be recognized separately from the amortization of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or Tax Credit Carryforward Exists. ASU 2013-11 requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or aright-of-use assets in the Statement of Operations. Further, payments of the principal portion of an unrecognized tax benefit,lease liabilities are to be classified as financing activities while payments of interest on lease liabilities and variable lease payments are to be classified as operating activities in the Statement of Cash Flows. When the standard is adopted, we will be required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward when settlement in this manner is available under the tax law. Thismodified retrospective approach. ASU 2016-02 is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013.2018, with early application permitted. We are evaluating the potentialanticipated impact of this adoptionadopting the ASU on ourthe consolidated financial statements.

 

Presentation of Financial Statements:In April 2013,August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, “Presentation2016-15, Statement of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation BasisCash Flows: Classification of Accounting.” The objective of ASU 2013-07 isCertain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues, including debt prepayments or debt extinguishment costs. Publicly-traded companies are required to clarify when an entity should applyadopt the liquidation basis of accounting. The update provides principles for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities and requirements for financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interimreporting periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.2017. We do not anticipateexpect this ASU will have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. Publicly-traded companies are required to adopt the update for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are evaluating the anticipated effect the ASU will have on the consolidated financial statements.

We are also evaluating other pronouncements recently issued but not yet adopted. The adoption of this standard willthese pronouncements is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, absent any indications that liquidation is imminent.

Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment: In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity. This new standard is intended to resolve diversity in practice regarding the release into net income of a cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) upon derecognition of a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity. ASU No. 2013-05 is effective prospectively for fiscal years (and interim reporting periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013. We currently anticipate that its adoption could have an impact on our consolidated financial statements, in the event of derecognition of a foreign subsidiary in 2014 or subsequently.  We cannot estimate the amount of CTA to be released into income from any potential derecognition.

Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date:  In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-04, “Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date”.  ASU No. 2013-04 provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. In addition, ASU No. 2013-04 requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation, as well as other information about the obligations. ASU No. 2013-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2013 and is to be applied retrospectively. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

MarketInterest Rate Risk

 

The principalOur exposure to market risks (such as therate risk of loss arising from adversefor changes in marketinterest rates and prices)primarily relates to which we are exposed are:

·rates onour investment portfolios, and

·exchange rates, generating translation and transaction gains and losses.

46



Table of Contents

Interest Rates

portfolio. We centrally manage our investment portfolios considering investment opportunities and risk,risks, tax consequences, and overall financing strategies. Our investment portfolio includes fixed-income securities with a fair value of approximately $281.5$66.8 million as ofat December 31, 2013.2016. These securities are subject to interest rate risk and, will decline in value if interest rates increase. Basedbased on our investment portfolio as ofat December 31, 2013, an immediate2016, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates maywould result in a decrease in the fair value of the portfolio of approximately $2.0$0.2 million. While an increase in interest rates may reduce the fair value of the investment portfolio, we will not realize the losses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations unless the individual fixed-income securities are sold prior to recovery or the loss is determined to be other-than-temporary.

 

Foreign OperationsCurrency Exchange Risk

 

OperatingWe conduct business on a worldwide basis and, as such, a portion of our revenues, earnings, and net investments in international markets involves exposureforeign affiliates is exposed to movementschanges in currency exchange rates, which are volatile at times.rates. The economic impact of currency exchange rate movements is complex because such changes are often linked to variability in real growth, inflation, interest rates, governmental actions, and other factors. These changes, if material, could cause us to adjust our financing and operating strategies. Consequently, isolating the effect of changes in currency does not incorporate these other important economic factors.

 

We have managed our risks and exposures to currency exchange rates through the use of derivative financial instruments (e.g., forward contracts). We only use derivative financial instruments in the context of hedging and do not use them for speculative purposes. During fiscal 2016, we did not designate foreign exchange derivatives as hedges. We did not enter into any derivative transactions in 2015. Accordingly, all foreign exchange derivatives are recorded in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value and changes in fair value from these contracts are recorded in “Other, net” in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Our net sales to foreign customers located outside of the United States represented approximately 83%74%, 84%82%, and 90%89% of our total net sales in 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively. We expect that net sales to foreign customers outside the United States will continue to represent a large percentage of our total net sales. Our net sales denominated in foreign currencies other than the U.S. dollar represented approximately 4%, 4%2%, and 3%8%, of total net sales in 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 2011,2014, respectively.

 

We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates. To mitigate these risks, we use derivative financial instruments. We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. We enter into monthly forward contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known currency exposures. The foreign currency that has the largest impact on translating our international operating profit (loss) is the Japanese Yen. We believe that based upon our hedging program, aA 10% change in foreign exchange rates would have an immaterial impact on the consolidated results of operations. We believe that this quantitative measure has inherent limitations because it does not take into account any governmental actions or changesoperations since most of our sales outside the United States are denominated in either customer purchasing patterns or our financing and operating strategies.U.S. dollars.

47



Table of Contents

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

Maturity

 

Notional

 

(in thousands)

 

Component of

 

Value

 

Dates

 

Amount

 

Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

1

 

January 2014

 

4,700

 

Foreign currency collar

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

906

 

October 2014

 

34,069

 

Total Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

$

907

 

 

 

$

38,769

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

Maturity

 

Notional

 

(in thousands)

 

Component of

 

Value

 

Dates

 

Amount

 

Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

248

 

January 2013

 

9,590

 

Total Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

$

248

 

 

 

$

9,590

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of realized net gain (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

and changes in the fair value of

 

 

 

Location of realized net gain

 

derivatives for the year ended

 

 

 

(loss) and changes in the fair

 

December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

value of derivatives

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Other, net

 

$

248

 

$

333

 

$

553

 

Foreign currency collar

 

Other, net

 

$

906

 

$

 

$

 

 

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

Our Consolidated Financial Statements are listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule filed as part of this Form 10-K.

 

Item 9.9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

 

None.

 

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013 (the “Evaluation”). Based upon the Evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) are effective.

48



Table of Contents

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

Our managementprincipal executive and financial officers have evaluated and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of December 31, 2016. The disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that the information

required to be disclosed in this report filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our principal executive and financial officers as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our principal executive and financial officers are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate “internal control over financial reporting” (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)). Management evaluates the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, usingwhich is a process designed and put into effect to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Using the criteria set forthestablished in the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework).(“COSO”), Management under the supervisionhas evaluated, assessed, and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of ourconcluded that internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2013, and concluded that it is effective.2016.

 

We acquired Synos duringKPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the quarter ended December 31, 2013, which is included in our 2013 consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and, constituted 14.6 percent and 17.0 percentas part of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2013 and 0.1 percent and 15.3 percent of our consolidated net sales and net loss, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2013. We have excluded Synos from our annual assessment of and conclusiontheir audit, has issued their report, included herein, on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, has audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, as stated in their report, which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

We monitor and evaluate, on an ongoing basis, our disclosure controls and procedures in order to improve their overall effectiveness. In the course of these evaluations, we modify and refine our internal processes as conditions warrant.  As required by Rule 13a-15(d), our management including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred duringDuring the quarter ended December 31, 20132016, there were no changes in internal control that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. We implemented a material change in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2013. The change related to the remediation

Report of internal controls of revenue recognition and related costs. Specifically, we completed the implementation of redesigned processes and increased the level of review of work performed by our personnel and third-party professionals in the identification and calculation of revenue and cost of revenue. We have completed our testing of the additional control processes outlined above and conclude that our previously reported material weakness has been satisfactorily remediated as of December 31, 2013.

49



Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors and ShareholdersStockholders of

Veeco Instruments Inc.:

 

We have audited Veeco InstrumentsInstrument Inc.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria)(COSO). The Company’sVeeco Instrument Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, andrisk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Companycompany are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company;company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’scompany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

As indicated in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, management’s assessment of and conclusion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting did not include the internal controls of Synos Technology, Inc. which is included in the 2013 consolidated financial statements of Veeco Instruments Inc. and constituted 14.6 percent and 17.0 percent of total and net assets, respectively, as of December 31, 2013 and 0.1 percent and 15.3 percent of net sales and net loss, respectively, for the year then ended. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting of the Company also did not include an evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting of Synos Technology, Inc.

In our opinion, Veeco Instruments Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO criteria.Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Veeco InstrumentsInstrument’s Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the two-year period ended December 31, 20132016, and our report dated February 28, 201422, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.on those consolidated financial statements.

 

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

New York, New York

February 28, 2014

 

50



Table of Contents/s/ KPMG LLP

 

Melville, New York
February 22, 2017

Item 9B. Other Information

 

None.

 

PART III

 

Portions of the information required by Part III of Form 10-K are incorporated by reference from Veeco’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC in connection with Veeco’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”).

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

 

The informationInformation required by this Item 10 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statementthat will appear under the headings “Corporate Governance,” “Executive Officers”Officers,” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.”Compliance” in the definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC relating to our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

 

We have adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers (the “Code”) which applies to our chief executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Code can be found on our website (www.veeco.com)(www.veeco.com). We intend to disclose on our website the nature of any future amendments to and waivers of the Code that apply to the chief executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or persons performing similar functions. We have also adopted a Code of Business Conduct which applies to all of our employees, including those listed above, as well as to our directors. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct can be found on our website (www.veeco.com)(www.veeco.com). The website address above is intended to be an inactive, textual reference only. None of the material on this website is part of this report.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

 

The informationInformation required by this Item 11 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statementthat will appear under the heading “Executive Compensation.”“Compensation” in the definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC relating to our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

The informationInformation required by this Item 12 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statementthat will appear under the headingheadings “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

The following table gives information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013. See our footnote Equity Compensation Plans and EquityInformation” in the notesdefinitive proxy statement to be filed with the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein for information regarding the material features of these plans.

 

 

Number of

 

 

 

Number of securities

 

 

 

securities to be

 

Weighted

 

remaining available

 

 

 

issued upon

 

average exercise

 

for future issuance

 

 

 

exercise of

 

price of

 

under equity

 

 

 

outstanding

 

outstanding

 

compensation plans

 

 

 

options,

 

options,

 

(excluding securities

 

 

 

warrants, and

 

warrants, and

 

reflected in column

 

 

 

rights

 

rights (1)

 

(a))

 

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

2,870,301

 

$

28.17

 

2,775,167

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders (2)

 

210,800

 

$

37.70

 

 

Total

 

3,081,101

 

 

 

2,775,167

 


(1)The calculation of the weighted average exercise price includes only stock options and does not include the outstanding restricted stock units which do not have an exercise price.

(2)In connection with our acquisition of Synos on October 1, 2013, equity awards were granted to Synos’ employees, pursuantSEC relating to our 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan, in order to create a retention incentive for those employees. Shares issued in connection with this

51



Table2017 Annual Meeting of Contents

equity award may be granted under the Veeco Instruments, Inc. 2010 Stock Incentive Plan.  There are no awards available for future grant under the Inducement Plan.Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

 

The informationInformation required by this Item 13 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statementthat will appear under the headings “Independence of the Board of Directors” and “CertainCertain Relationships and Related Transactions.”Transactions” and “Independence of Board” in the definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC relating to our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

 

The informationInformation required by this Item 14 of Form 10-K is incorporated by reference to our Proxy Statementthat will appear under the heading “Proposal 3—4 — Ratification of the Appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”KPMG” in the definitive proxy statement to be filed with the SEC relating to our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated herein by reference.

52



Table of Contents

PART IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits, and Financial Statements and ScheduleStatement Schedules

 

(a)  (1)  The Registrant’s financial statements together with a separate table of contents are annexed hereto. The financial statement schedule ishereto

(2)  Financial Statement Schedules are listed in the separate table of contents annexed hereto.

(b)(3)  Exhibits

 

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

 

Number

Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference to the Following 
Documents

2.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed or

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Furnished

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

2.1

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger dated as of February 2, 2017 among Ultratech, Inc., Veeco Instruments Inc. and Ulysses Acquisition Subsidiary Corp.

 

8-K

 

2.1

 

2/3/2017

 

 

2.2

 

Securities Purchase Agreement, dated December 4, 2014, by and among Solid State Equipment Holdings LLC, certain securityholders thereof, Veeco Instruments Inc. and certain other parties thereto.

 

10-K

 

2.1

 

2/24/2015

 

 

2.3

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 18, 2013, by and among Veeco, Veeco Wyoming Inc., Synos Technology, Inc., certain stockholders of Synos Technology, Inc., and Shareholder Representative Services LLC.

 

10-K

 

2.1

 

2/28/2014

 

 

3.1

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated December 1, 1994, as amended June 2, 1997 and July 25, 1997.

 

10-Q

 

3.1

 

8/14/1997

 

 

3.2

 

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 29, 1998.

 

10-K

 

3.2

 

3/14/2001

 

 

3.3

 

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 5, 2000.

 

10-Q

 

3.1

 

8/14/2000

 

 

3.4

 

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 16, 2002.

 

10-Q

 

3.1

 

10/26/2009

 

 

3.5

 

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 14, 2010.

 

10-K

 

3.8

 

2/24/2011

 

 

3.6

 

Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective February 5, 2016.

 

8-K

 

3.1

 

5/9/2001

 

 

3.7

 

Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Veeco.

 

8-K

 

3.1

 

5/26/2010

 

 

4.1

 

Indenture, dated as of January 18, 2017, by and between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 2.70% Convertible Notes due 2023).

 

8-K

 

4.1

 

1/18/2017

 

 

4.2

 

First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 18, 2017, by and between Veeco Instruments Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (relating to the 2.70% Convertible Notes due 2023).

 

8-K

 

4.2

 

1/18/2017

 

 

4.3

 

Form of 2.70% Convertible Senior Note due 2023.

 

8-K

 

4.3

 

1/18/2017

 

 

10.1

 

Loan Agreement dated as of December 15, 1999 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

 

10-Q

 

10.2

 

11/14/2001

 

 

10.2

 

Promissory Note dated as of December 15, 1999 issued by Applied Epi, Inc. to Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

 

10-Q

 

10.3

 

11/14/2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed or

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Furnished

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

10.3

 

Amendment to Loan Documents effective as of September 17, 2001 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company (executed in June 2002).

 

10-Q

 

10.2

 

8/14/2002

 

 

10.4*

 

Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006.

 

10-Q

 

10.4

 

8/4/2006

 

 

10.5*

 

Amendment No. 1 effective April 18, 2007 (ratified by the Board August 7, 2007) to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

10-Q

 

10.1

 

8/7/2007

 

 

10.6*

 

Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

 

10-K

 

10.41

 

3/2/2009

 

 

10.7*

 

Veeco Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 14, 2010.

 

Def 14A

 

Appendix A

 

11/4/2013

 

 

10.8*

 

Veeco Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 5, 2016.

 

S-8

 

10.1

 

6/2/2016

 

 

10.9*

 

Form of Notice of Performance Share Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2015.

 

10-Q

 

10.1

 

8/3/2015

 

 

10.10*

 

Form of Notice of Performance Share Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2016.

 

10-Q

 

10.1

 

11/1/2016

 

 

10.11*

 

Form of Notice of Critical Priorities Performance Share Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2016.

 

10-Q

 

10.2

 

11/1/2016

 

 

10.12*

 

Veeco 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan, effective September 26, 2013.

 

10-Q

 

10.1

 

11/4/2013

 

 

10.13*

 

Form of 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement.

 

10-Q

 

10.2

 

11/4/2013

 

 

10.14*

 

Form of 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement.

 

10-Q

 

10.3

 

11/4/2013

 

 

10.15*

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan.

 

S-8

 

10.9

 

6/2/2016

 

 

10.16*

 

Form of Support Agreement (issued in connection with the Agreement and Plan of Merger with Ultratech, Inc. dated February 2, 2017).

 

8-K

 

10.1

 

2/3/2017

 

 

10.17*

 

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Veeco and each of its directors and executive officers.

 

8-K

 

10.1

 

10/23/2006

 

 

10.18*

 

Veeco Amended and Restated Senior Executive Change in Control Policy, effective as of January 1, 2014.

 

10-K

 

10.22

 

2/28/2014

 

 

10.19*

 

Employment Agreement effective as of July 1, 2007 between Veeco and John R. Peeler.

 

10-Q

 

10.3

 

8/7/2007

 

 

10.20*

 

Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler.

 

10-K

 

10.38

 

3/2/2009

 

 

10.21*

 

Second Amendment effective June 11, 2010 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler.

 

10-Q

 

10.1

 

7/29/2010

 

 

10.22*

 

Third Amendment effective April 27, 2012 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler.

 

10-Q

 

10.2

 

5/9/2012

 

 

10.23*

 

Amendment dated June 12, 2014 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler.

 

10-Q

 

10.3

 

7/31/2014

 

 

10.24*

 

Letter Agreement dated April 8, 2014 between Veeco and Shubham Maheshwari.

 

10-Q

 

10.1

 

7/31/2014

��

 

10.25*

 

Letter Agreement dated January 30, 2012 between Veeco and Dr. William J. Miller.

 

10-K

 

10.3

 

2/22/2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed or

Exhibit

 

 

 

Incorporated by Reference

 

Furnished

Number

 

Exhibit Description

 

Form

 

Exhibit

 

Filing Date

 

Herewith

10.26*

 

Letter dated December 22, 2015 from Veeco to Dr. William J. Miller.

 

10-K

 

10.21

 

2/25/2016

 

 

10.27*

 

Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.

 

10-K

 

10.38

 

3/12/2004

 

 

10.28*

 

Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Letter Agreement between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.

 

10-Q

 

10.3

 

8/4/2006

 

 

10.29*

 

Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Letter Agreement between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.

 

10-K

 

10.40

 

3/2/2009

 

 

10.30*

 

Letter Agreement effective as of June 19, 2009 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.

 

10-Q

 

10.2

 

7/30/2009

 

 

16.1

 

Letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission from Ernst & Young LLP, dated March 19, 2015.

 

8-K

 

16.1

 

3/19/2015

 

 

21.1

 

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

23.1

 

Consent of KPMG LLP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

23.2

 

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

31.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

31.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

32.1

 

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

32.2

 

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

101.XSD

 

XBRL Schema.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

101.PRE

 

XBRL Presentation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

101.CAL

 

XBRL Calculation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

101.DEF

 

XBRL Definition.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

101.LAB

 

XBRL Label.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

**

 

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 18, 2013, by and among Veeco, Veeco Wyoming Inc., Synos Technology, Inc. certain stockholders of Synos Technology, Inc., and Shareholder Representative Services LLC

Filed herewith

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated December 1, 1994, as amended June 2, 1997 and July 25, 1997.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 3.1

3.2

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 29, 1998.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, Exhibit 3.2

3.3

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 5, 2000.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, Exhibit 3.1

3.4

Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Veeco.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, Exhibit 3.1

3.5

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 16, 2002

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Exhibit 3.1

3.6

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 14, 2010

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, Exhibit 3.8

3.7

Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco, effective October 23, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2008, Exhibit 3.1

3.8

Amendment No. 1 to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective May 20, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2010, Exhibit 3.1

3.9

Amendment No. 2 to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective October 20, 2011

Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 24, 2011, Exhibit 3.1

10.1

Loan Agreement dated as of December 15, 1999 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.2

10.2

Amendment to Loan Documents effective as of September 17, 2001 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company (executed in June 2002).

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, Exhibit 10.2

10.3

Promissory Note dated as of December 15, 1999 issued by Applied Epi, Inc. to Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.3

10.4*

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Veeco and each of its directors and executive officers.

Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1

53



Table of Contents

Number

Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference to the Following 
Documents

10.5*

Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.4

10.6*

Amendment No. 1 effective April 18, 2007 (ratified by the Board August 7, 2007) to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1

10.7*

Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.41

10.8*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Veeco 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 2005

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September  30, 2005, Exhibit 10.3

10.9*

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2006

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September  30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

10.10*

Veeco Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 14, 2010

Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 4, 2013, Appendix A

10.11*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (2012 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.2

10.12*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (2012 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.3

10.13*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2012 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.4

10.14*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Non-Employee Director) (2011 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.5

10.15*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Performance Based) (2012 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.6

10.16*

Veeco 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan, effective September 26, 2013

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.1

10.17*

Form of 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.2

10.18*

Form of 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.3

10.19*

Veeco Performance-Based Restricted Stock 2010

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.2

10.20*

Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of September 12, 2008

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.3

10.21*

Amendment No. 1 dated December 23, 2008 (effective September 12, 2008) to Veeco Senior Executive Change in Control Policy

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.37

10.22*

Veeco Amended and Restated Senior Executive Change in Control Policy, effective as of January 1, 2014

Filed herewith

10.23*

Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.38

10.24*

Second Amendment effective June 11, 2010 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

54



Table of Contents

Number

Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference to the Following 
Documents

10.25*

Third Amendment effective April 27, 2012 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, Exhibit 10.2

10.26*

Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2009 (effective January 18, 2010) between Veeco and David D. Glass

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

10.27*

Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.38

10.28*

Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Letter Agreement between Veeco and John P. Kiernan

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

10.29*

Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Letter Agreement between Veeco and John P. Kiernan

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.40

10.30*

Letter agreement effective as of June 19, 2009 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Exhibit 10.2

10.31*

Letter agreement effective as of January 4, 2010 between Veeco and Peter Collingwood

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, Exhibit 10.1

10.32*

Letter Agreement dated January 30, 2012 between Veeco and Dr. William J. Miller

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, Exhibit 10.30

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

Filed herewith

23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

Filed herewith

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

Filed herewith

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

Filed herewith

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002

Filed herewith

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002

Filed herewith

101.INS

XBRL Instance

**

101.XSD

XBRL Schema

**

101.PRE

XBRL Presentation

**

101.CAL

XBRL Calculation

**

101.DEF

XBRL Definition

**

101.LAB

XBRL Label

**


*   Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement, as required by Item 15(a) (3) of Form 10-K.

** Filed herewith electronically

55



Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on February 28, 2014.

22, 2017.

 

 

Veeco Instruments Inc.

 

 

 

 

By:

/S/ JOHN R. PEELER

 

 

John R. Peeler

 

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated, on February 28, 2014.22, 2017.

 

Signature

Title

/s/ /s/ JOHN R. PEELER

 

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

John R. Peeler

 

(principal executive officer)

 

 

 

/s/  DAVID D. GLASS /s/ SHUBHAM MAHESHWARI

 

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

David D. GlassShubham Maheshwari

 

(principal financial officer)

 

 

 

/s/  JOHN P. KIERNAN

 

Senior Vice President, Finance, Chief Accounting Officer,

 /s/ JOHN P. KIERNAN

Corporate Controller and Treasurer

John P. Kiernan

 

(principal accounting officer)

 

 

 

/s/  EDWARD H. BRAUN /s/ KATHLEEN A. BAYLESS

 

Director

Edward H. BraunKathleen A. Bayless

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ /s/ RICHARD A. D’AMORE

 

Director

Richard A. D’Amore

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ /s/ GORDON HUNTER

 

Director

Gordon Hunter

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ /s/ KEITH D. JACKSON

 

Director

Keith D. Jackson

 

 

 

 

 

/s/  ROGER D. MCDANIEL

Director

Roger D. McDaniel

/s/ /s/ PETER J. SIMONE

 

Director

Peter J. Simone

 

 

56



Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

Number

Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference to the Following 
Documents

2.1

Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated September 18, 2013, by and among Veeco, Veeco Wyoming Inc., Synos Technology, Inc. certain stockholders of Synos Technology, Inc., and Shareholder Representative Services LLC

Filed herewith

 

 

 

3.1 /s/ THOMAS ST. DENNIS

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated December 1, 1994, as amended June 2, 1997 and July 25, 1997.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1997, Exhibit 3.1Director

Thomas St. Dennis

 

 

3.2

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 29, 1998.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, Exhibit 3.2

3.3

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 5, 2000.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000, Exhibit 3.1

3.4

Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of Veeco.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001, Exhibit 3.1

3.5

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 16, 2002

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, Exhibit 3.1

3.6

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Veeco dated May 14, 2010

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, Exhibit 3.8

3.7

Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco, effective October 23, 2008

Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2008, Exhibit 3.1

3.8

Amendment No. 1 to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective May 20, 2010

Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 26, 2010, Exhibit 3.1

3.9

Amendment No. 2 to the Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Veeco effective October 20, 2011

Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 24, 2011, Exhibit 3.1

10.1

Loan Agreement dated as of December 15, 1999 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.2

10.2

Amendment to Loan Documents effective as of September 17, 2001 between Applied Epi, Inc. and Jackson National Life Insurance Company (executed in June 2002).

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, Exhibit 10.2

10.3

Promissory Note dated as of December 15, 1999 issued by Applied Epi, Inc. to Jackson National Life Insurance Company.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001, Exhibit 10.3

10.4*

Form of Indemnification Agreement entered into between Veeco and each of its directors and executive officers.

Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2006, Exhibit 10.1

10.5*

Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective July 20, 2006.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.4

10.6*

Amendment No. 1 effective April 18, 2007 (ratified by the Board August 7, 2007) to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, Exhibit 10.1

10.7*

Amendment No. 2 dated January 22, 2009 to Veeco Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Incentive Plan.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.41

57



Table of Contents

Number

Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference to the Following 
Documents

10.8*

Form of Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to the Veeco 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective November 2005

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September  30, 2005, Exhibit 10.3

10.9*

Form of Notice of Restricted Stock Award and related terms and conditions pursuant to the Veeco 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, effective June 2006

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September  30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

10.10*

Veeco Amended and Restated 2010 Stock Incentive Plan, effective May 14, 2010

Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed November 4, 2013, Appendix A

10.11*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement (2012 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.2

10.12*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (2012 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.3

10.13*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (2012 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.4

10.14*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Non-Employee Director) (2011 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.5

10.15*

Form of 2010 Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Agreement (Performance Based) (2012 rev.)

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.6

10.16*

Veeco 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan, effective September 26, 2013

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.1

10.17*

Form of 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.2

10.18*

Form of 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Agreement

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2012, Exhibit 10.3

10.19*

Veeco Performance-Based Restricted Stock 2010

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.2

10.20*

Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of September 12, 2008

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.3

10.21*

Amendment No. 1 dated December 23, 2008 (effective September 12, 2008) to Veeco Senior Executive Change in Control Policy

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.37

10.22*

Veeco Amended and Restated Senior Executive Change in Control Policy, effective as of January 1, 2014

Filed herewith

10.23*

Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.38

10.24*

Second Amendment effective June 11, 2010 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

10.25*

Third Amendment effective April 27, 2012 to Employment Agreement between Veeco and John R. Peeler

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, Exhibit 10.2

10.26*

Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2009 (effective January 18, 2010) between Veeco and David D. Glass

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, Exhibit 10.1

10.27*

Letter Agreement dated January 21, 2004 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan.

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, Exhibit 10.38

58



Table of Contents

Number

Exhibit

Incorporated by Reference to the Following 
Documents

10.28*

Amendment effective June 9, 2006 to Letter Agreement between Veeco and John P. Kiernan

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006, Exhibit 10.3

10.29*

Amendment effective December 31, 2008 to Letter Agreement between Veeco and John P. Kiernan

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, Exhibit 10.40

10.30*

Letter agreement effective as of June 19, 2009 between Veeco and John P. Kiernan

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, Exhibit 10.2

10.31*

Letter agreement effective as of January 4, 2010 between Veeco and Peter Collingwood

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2012, Exhibit 10.1

10.32*

Letter Agreement dated January 30, 2012 between Veeco and Dr. William J. Miller

Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, Exhibit 10.30

21.1

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

Filed herewith

23.1

Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.

Filed herewith

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

Filed herewith

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a—14(a) or Rule 15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.

Filed herewith

32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002

Filed herewith

32.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002

Filed herewith

101.INS

XBRL Instance

**

101.XSD

XBRL Schema

**

101.PRE

XBRL Presentation

**

101.CAL

XBRL Calculation

**

101.DEF

XBRL Definition

**

101.LAB

XBRL Label

**


*   Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement, as required by Item 15(a) (3) of Form 10-K.

** Filed herewith electronically

59



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

 

Page

 

 

ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmFirms on Financial Statements

F-2

Consolidated Balance Sheets as ofat December 31, 20132016 and 20122015

F-3F-4

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 20112014

F-4F-5

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 20112014

F-5F-6

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 20112014

F-6F-7

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 20112014

F-7F-8

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

F-8F-9

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

S-1

 

F-1F-1



Table of Contents

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

The Board of Directors and ShareholdersStockholders of

Veeco Instruments Inc.:

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Veeco Instruments Inc. (the “Company”)and subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 20122015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits2016. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, we also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a).have audited Schedule II – Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. These consolidated financial statements and thefinancial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.audit.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Veeco Instruments Inc. atand subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, and the consolidated results of itstheir operations and itstheir cash flows for each of the three years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2013,2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Veeco InstrumentsInstrument Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework)(COSO) , and our report dated February 28, 201422, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ KPMG LLP

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

 

 

New York,Melville, New York

 

February 28, 201422, 2017

 

F-2F-2



Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of

Veeco Instruments Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of Veeco Instruments, Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows of Veeco Instruments, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Jericho, New York
February 24, 2015

F-3



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in thousands, except share data)amounts)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

210,799

 

$

384,557

 

 

$

277,444

 

$

269,232

 

Short-term investments

 

281,538

 

192,234

 

 

66,787

 

116,050

 

Restricted cash

 

2,738

 

2,017

 

Accounts receivable, net

 

23,823

 

63,169

 

 

58,020

 

49,524

 

Inventories

 

59,726

 

59,807

 

 

77,063

 

77,469

 

Deferred cost of goods sold

 

724

 

1,797

 

Deferred cost of sales

 

6,160

 

2,100

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

22,579

 

30,358

 

 

16,034

 

22,760

 

Assets held for sale

 

 

5,000

 

Total current assets

 

501,508

 

542,135

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

60,646

 

79,590

 

Intangible assets, net

 

58,378

 

131,674

 

Goodwill

 

114,908

 

114,908

 

Deferred income taxes

 

11,716

 

10,545

 

 

2,045

 

1,384

 

Total current assets

 

613,643

 

744,484

 

Property, plant and equipment at cost, net

 

89,139

 

98,302

 

Goodwill

 

91,348

 

55,828

 

Intangible assets, net

 

114,716

 

20,974

 

Other assets

 

38,726

 

16,781

 

 

21,047

 

21,098

 

Deferred income taxes

 

397

 

935

 

Total assets

 

$

947,969

 

$

937,304

 

 

$

758,532

 

$

890,789

 

Liabilities and equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

$

35,755

 

$

26,087

 

 

$

22,607

 

$

30,074

 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 

51,084

 

41,401

 

 

33,201

 

49,393

 

Customer deposits and deferred revenue

 

34,754

 

42,099

 

 

85,022

 

76,216

 

Income taxes payable

 

6,149

 

2,292

 

 

2,311

 

6,208

 

Deferred income taxes

 

159

 

140

 

Current portion of long-term debt

 

290

 

268

 

 

368

 

340

 

Total current liabilities

 

128,191

 

112,287

 

 

143,509

 

162,231

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

28,052

 

7,137

 

 

13,199

 

11,211

 

Long-term debt

 

1,847

 

2,138

 

 

826

 

1,193

 

Other liabilities

 

9,649

 

4,530

 

 

6,403

 

1,539

 

Total liabilities

 

167,739

 

126,092

 

 

163,937

 

176,174

 

Equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock; $.01 par value; authorized 120,000,000 shares; 39,666,195 shares issued and outstanding in 2013; and 39,328,503 shares issued and outstanding in 2012

 

397

 

393

 

Stockholders’ equity:

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding

 

 

 

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 120,000,000 shares authorized; 40,714,790 and 40,995,694 shares issued at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively; 40,588,194 and 40,526,902 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

407

 

410

 

Additional paid-in capital

 

721,352

 

708,723

 

 

763,303

 

767,137

 

Retained earnings

 

53,860

 

96,123

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(168,583

)

 

(45,058

)

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

4,621

 

5,973

 

 

1,777

 

1,348

 

Total equity

 

780,230

 

811,212

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

947,969

 

$

937,304

 

Treasury stock, at cost, 126,596 and 468,792 shares at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

 

(2,309

)

 

(9,222

)

Total stockholders’ equity

 

594,595

 

714,615

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 

$

758,532

 

$

890,789

 

 

The

See accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

F-3F-4



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(in thousands, except per share data)amounts)

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net sales

 

$

331,749

 

$

516,020

 

$

979,135

 

Cost of sales

 

228,607

 

300,887

 

504,801

 

Gross profit

 

103,142

 

215,133

 

474,334

 

Operating expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

85,486

 

73,110

 

95,134

 

Research and development

 

81,424

 

95,153

 

96,596

 

Amortization

 

5,527

 

4,908

 

4,734

 

Restructuring

 

1,485

 

3,813

 

1,288

 

Asset impairment

 

1,220

 

1,335

 

584

 

Total operating expenses

 

175,142

 

178,319

 

198,336

 

Other, net

 

(1,017

)

(398

)

(261

)

Changes in contingent consideration

 

829

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(71,812

)

37,212

 

276,259

 

Interest income

 

1,200

 

2,476

 

3,776

 

Interest expense

 

(598

)

(1,502

)

(4,600

)

Interest income (expense), net

 

602

 

974

 

(824

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

(3,349

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

(71,210

)

38,186

 

272,086

 

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

(28,947

)

11,657

 

81,584

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations

 

(42,263

)

26,529

 

190,502

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

 

6,269

 

(91,885

)

Income tax provision (benefit)

 

 

1,870

 

(29,370

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

 

4,399

 

(62,515

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(42,263

)

$

30,928

 

$

127,987

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.69

 

$

4.80

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.11

 

(1.57

)

Income (loss)

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.80

 

$

3.23

 

Diluted :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.68

 

$

4.63

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

0.11

 

(1.52

)

Income (loss)

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.79

 

$

3.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

38,807

 

38,477

 

39,658

 

Diluted

 

38,807

 

39,051

 

41,155

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net sales

 

$

332,451

 

 

$

477,038

 

 

$

392,873

 

Cost of sales

 

199,593

 

 

299,797

 

 

257,991

 

Gross profit

 

132,858

 

 

177,241

 

 

134,882

 

Operating expenses, net:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Research and development

 

81,016

 

 

78,543

 

 

81,171

 

Selling, general, and administrative

 

77,642

 

 

90,188

 

 

89,760

 

Amortization of intangible assets

 

19,219

 

 

27,634

 

 

13,146

 

Restructuring

 

5,640

 

 

4,679

 

 

4,394

 

Asset impairment

 

69,520

 

 

126

 

 

58,170

 

Changes in contingent consideration

 

 

 

 

 

(29,368

)

Other, net

 

223

 

 

(697

)

 

(3,182

)

Total operating expenses, net

 

253,260

 

 

200,473

 

 

214,091

 

Operating income (loss)

 

(120,402

)

 

(23,232

)

 

(79,209

)

Interest income

 

1,180

 

 

1,050

 

 

1,570

 

Interest expense

 

(222

)

 

(464

)

 

(715

)

Income (loss) before income taxes

 

(119,444

)

 

(22,646

)

 

(78,354

)

Income tax expense (benefit)

 

2,766

 

 

9,332

 

 

(11,414

)

Net income (loss)

 

$

(122,210

)

 

$

(31,978

)

 

$

(66,940

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(3.11

)

 

$

(0.80

)

 

$

(1.70

)

Diluted

 

$

(3.11

)

 

$

(0.80

)

 

$

(1.70

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average number of shares:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

39,340

 

 

39,742

 

 

39,350

 

Diluted

 

39,340

 

 

39,742

 

 

39,350

 

 

The

See accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

F-4F-5



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

For the year ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(42,263

)

$

30,928

 

$

127,987

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities

 

34

 

(118

)

393

 

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

 

11

 

50

 

(79

)

Less: Reclassification adjustments for gains included in net income (loss)

 

(61

)

(24

)

(271

)

Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities

 

(16

)

(92

)

43

 

Minimum pension liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minimum pension liability

 

125

 

(216

)

(73

)

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

 

(86

)

79

 

30

 

Net minimum pension liability

 

39

 

(137

)

(43

)

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

(1,322

)

(1,071

)

1,228

 

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

 

(53

)

683

 

(434

)

Net foreign currency translation

 

(1,375

)

(388

)

794

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

(1,352

)

(617

)

794

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(43,615

)

$

30,311

 

$

128,781

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(122,210

)

 

$

(31,978

)

 

$

(66,940

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available-for-sale securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in net unrealized gains or losses

 

(6

)

 

(49

)

 

51

 

Reclassification adjustments for net (gains) losses included in net income

 

18

 

 

 

 

(65

)

Net changes related to available-for-sale securities

 

12

 

 

(49

)

 

(14

)

Minimum pension liability:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in minimum pension liability

 

 

 

15

 

 

(145

)

Reclassification adjustments for net (gains) losses included in net income

 

866

 

 

 

 

 

Net changes related to minimum pension liability

 

866

 

 

15

 

 

(145

)

Currency translation adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in currency translation adjustments

 

(19

)

 

(87

)

 

149

 

Reclassification adjustments for net (gains) losses included in net income

 

(430

)

 

 

 

(3,142

)

Net changes related to currency translation adjustments

 

(449

)

 

(87

)

 

(2,993

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

429

 

 

(121

)

 

(3,152

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(121,781

)

 

$

(32,099

)

 

$

(70,092

)

 

The

See accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

F-5F-6



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Treasury

 

Paid-in

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Equity

 

Balance as of January 1, 2011

 

40,337,950

 

$

409

 

$

(38,098

)

$

656,969

 

$

137,436

 

$

5,796

 

$

762,512

 

Exercise of stock options

 

688,105

 

7

 

 

10,707

 

 

 

10,714

 

Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

 

 

 

 

12,807

 

 

 

12,807

 

Equity-based compensation expense-discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

689

 

 

 

689

 

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

 

131,196

 

1

 

 

(3,175

)

 

 

(3,174

)

Treasury stock

 

(4,160,228

)

 

(162,077

)

 

 

 

(162,077

)

Debt Conversion

 

1,771,413

 

18

 

 

(50

)

 

 

(32

)

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

 

 

 

 

10,406

 

 

 

10,406

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

(106

)

794

 

688

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

127,987

 

 

127,987

 

Balance as of December 31, 2011

 

38,768,436

 

435

 

(200,175

)

688,353

 

265,317

 

6,590

 

760,520

 

Exercise of stock options

 

351,436

 

4

 

 

5,405

 

 

 

5,409

 

Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

 

 

 

 

14,268

 

 

 

14,268

 

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

 

208,631

 

7

 

 

(1,732

)

 

 

(1,725

)

Treasury stock

 

 

(53

)

200,175

 

 

(200,122

)

 

 

Prior period debt conversion adjustment

 

 

 

 

310

 

 

 

310

 

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

 

 

 

 

2,119

 

 

 

2,119

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

(617

)

(617

)

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

30,928

 

 

30,928

 

Balance as of December 31, 2012

 

39,328,503

 

393

 

 

708,723

 

96,123

 

5,973

 

811,212

 

Exercise of stock options

 

149,170

 

2

 

 

2,197

 

 

 

2,199

 

Equity-based compensation expense-continuing operations

 

 

 

 

13,130

 

 

 

13,130

 

Issuance, vesting and cancellation of restricted stock

 

188,522

 

2

 

 

(2,698

)

 

 

(2,696

)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1,352

)

(1,352

)

Net income (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

(42,263

)

 

(42,263

)

Balance as of December 31, 2013

 

39,666,195

 

$

397

 

$

 

$

721,352

 

$

53,860

 

$

4,621

 

$

780,230

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Retained

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

Earnings

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Treasury Stock

 

Paid-in

 

(Accumulated

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Deficit)

 

Income

 

Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

39,666

 

$

397

 

 

$

 

$

721,352

 

$

53,860

 

$

4,621

 

$

780,230

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

(66,940

)

 

(66,940

)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,152

)

(3,152

)

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

18,813

 

 

 

18,813

 

Net issuance under employee stock plans

 

694

 

7

 

 

 

9,974

 

 

 

9,981

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

40,360

 

404

 

 

 

750,139

 

(13,080

)

1,469

 

738,932

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

(31,978

)

 

(31,978

)

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(121

)

(121

)

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

17,986

 

 

 

17,986

 

Net issuance under employee stock plans

 

636

 

6

 

 

 

(988

)

 

 

(982

)

Purchases of common stock

 

 

 

469

 

(9,222

)

 

 

 

(9,222

)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

40,996

 

410

 

469

 

(9,222

)

767,137

 

(45,058

)

1,348

 

714,615

 

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle - adoption of ASU 2016-09

 

 

 

 

 

1,315

 

(1,315

)

 

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

(122,210

)

 

(122,210

)

Other comprehensive income, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

429

 

429

 

Share-based compensation expense

 

 

 

 

 

15,741

 

 

 

15,741

 

Net issuance under employee stock plans

 

(281

)

(3

)

(1,072

)

19,948

 

(20,890

)

 

 

(945

)

Purchases of common stock

 

 

 

730

 

(13,035

)

 

 

 

(13,035

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

40,715

 

$

407

 

127

 

$

(2,309

)

$

763,303

 

$

(168,583

)

$

1,777

 

$

594,595

 

 

The

See accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

F-6F-7



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(42,263

)

$

30,928

 

$

127,987

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

18,425

 

16,192

 

12,892

 

Amortization of debt discount

 

 

 

1,260

 

Non-cash equity-based compensation

 

13,130

 

14,268

 

12,807

 

Non-cash asset impairment

 

1,220

 

1,335

 

584

 

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

3,349

 

Deferred income taxes

 

(12,264

)

(340

)

11,276

 

Gain on disposal of segment

 

 

(4,112

)

 

Gain on sale of lab tools

 

(767

)

 

 

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

 

 

(2,119

)

(10,406

)

Change in contingent consideration

 

829

 

 

 

Other, net

 

1,971

 

262

 

(31

)

Non-cash items from discontinued operations

 

 

(706

)

44,381

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

38,844

 

31,215

 

56,843

 

Inventories

 

2,753

 

53,937

 

(18,627

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

842

 

8,524

 

(13,087

)

Income taxes receivable

 

(12,604

)

654

 

(9,076

)

Accounts payable

 

7,542

 

(12,106

)

8,098

 

Accrued expenses, customer deposits, deferred revenue and other current liabilities

 

(17,329

)

(34,227

)

(72,723

)

Income taxes payable

 

(130

)

1,199

 

(42,204

)

Transfers to restricted cash

 

(721

)

(1,440

)

 

Other, net

 

1,249

 

10,431

 

2,119

 

Discontinued operations

 

 

(1,932

)

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

727

 

111,963

 

115,442

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Capital expenditures

 

(9,174

)

(24,994

)

(60,364

)

Payments for net assets of businesses acquired

 

(71,488

)

 

(28,273

)

Payment for purchase of cost method investment

 

(2,391

)

(10,341

)

 

Transfers from (to) restricted cash related to discontinued operations

 

 

 

75,540

 

Proceeds from short-term investments

 

499,645

 

244,929

 

707,649

 

Payments for purchases of short-term investments

 

(589,099

)

(165,080

)

(588,453

)

Proceeds from the sale of lab tools

 

4,440

 

 

 

Other

 

11

 

49

 

195

 

Proceeds from sale of assets from discontinued segment

 

 

3,758

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

(168,056

)

48,321

 

106,294

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises

 

2,199

 

5,409

 

10,714

 

Contingent consideration payments

 

(5,000

)

 

 

Restricted stock tax withholdings

 

(2,696

)

(1,725

)

(3,173

)

Excess tax benefits from stock option exercises

 

 

2,119

 

10,406

 

Purchases of treasury stock

 

 

 

(162,077

)

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(269

)

(248

)

(105,803

)

Other

 

 

 

(2

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

(5,766

)

5,555

 

(249,935

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(663

)

796

 

989

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

(173,758

)

166,635

 

(27,210

)

Cash and cash equivalents as of beginning of year

 

384,557

 

217,922

 

245,132

 

Cash and cash equivalents as of end of year

 

$

210,799

 

$

384,557

 

$

217,922

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

357

 

$

209

 

$

1,393

 

Income taxes paid

 

8,001

 

11,566

 

89,745

 

Non-cash investing and financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accrual of fair value of contingent consideration

 

$

33,539

 

$

 

$

 

Merger consideration adjustment

 

2,695

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(122,210

)

 

$

(31,978

)

 

$

(66,940

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

32,650

 

 

39,850

 

 

24,573

 

Deferred income taxes

 

940

 

 

2,648

 

 

(11,330

)

Share-based compensation expense

 

15,741

 

 

17,986

 

 

18,813

 

Asset impairment

 

69,520

 

 

126

 

 

58,170

 

Gain on sale of lab tools

 

 

 

(1,261

)

 

(1,549

)

Provision (recovery) for bad debts

 

171

 

 

43

 

 

(1,814

)

Gain on cumulative translation adjustment

 

(430

)

 

 

 

(3,142

)

Change in contingent consideration

 

 

 

 

 

(29,368

)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts receivable

 

(8,667

)

 

10,715

 

 

(25,390

)

Inventories and deferred cost of sales

 

(5,389

)

 

(12,312

)

 

6,513

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 

6,726

 

 

(39

)

 

(2,245

)

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

(24,202

)

 

9,470

 

 

(5,534

)

Customer deposits and deferred revenue

 

8,807

 

 

(20,738

)

 

55,536

 

Income taxes receivable and payable, net

 

547

 

 

759

 

 

20,279

 

Other, net

 

1,952

 

 

520

 

 

5,497

 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 

(23,844

)

 

15,789

 

 

42,069

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired

 

 

 

(68

)

 

(144,069

)

Capital expenditures

 

(11,479

)

 

(13,887

)

 

(15,588

)

Proceeds from the sale of investments

 

152,301

 

 

88,647

 

 

318,276

 

Payments for purchases of investments

 

(103,394

)

 

(84,244

)

 

(157,737

)

Payments for purchases of cost method investment

 

 

 

(1,594

)

 

(2,388

)

Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment

 

9,512

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of lab tools

 

 

 

3,068

 

 

9,259

 

Other

 

(230

)

 

1,000

 

 

350

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

 

46,710

 

 

(7,078

)

 

8,103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from stock option exercises and employee stock purchase plan

 

1,656

 

 

2,233

 

 

12,056

 

Restricted stock tax withholdings

 

(2,601

)

 

(3,215

)

 

(2,075

)

Purchases of common stock

 

(13,349

)

 

(8,907

)

 

 

Repayments of long-term debt

 

(340

)

 

(314

)

 

(290

)

Net cash provided by (used) in financing activities

 

(14,634

)

 

(10,203

)

 

9,691

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

(20

)

 

(87

)

 

149

 

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

8,212

 

 

(1,579

)

 

60,012

 

Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period

 

269,232

 

 

270,811

 

 

210,799

 

Cash and cash equivalents - end of period

 

$

277,444

 

 

$

269,232

 

 

$

270,811

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest paid

 

$

225

 

 

$

485

 

 

$

159

 

Income taxes paid

 

1,699

 

 

7,091

 

 

3,320

 

Non-cash operating and financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net transfer of inventory to property, plant and equipment

 

1,827

 

 

 

 

 

 

The

See accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

F-7F-8



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2013

 

1.  Description of Business andNote 1 — Significant Accounting Policies

 

(a) Description of Business

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Veeco,” or the “Company” or “we”) creates process equipment solutions that enable technologies foroperates in a cleaner and more productive world. Wesingle segment: the design, development, manufacture, and marketsupport of thin film process equipment primarily sold to make electronic devices including light emitting diodes (“LED”s) and hard-disk drives, as well as for emerging applications such as concentrator photovoltaics,LEDs”), power semiconductors, wireless components, micro-electromechanical systems (“MEMS”), and other next-generation devices.

Our LED & Solar segment designs and manufactures metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) and molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) systems as well as newly acquired atomic layer deposition (“ALD”) technology. Our MOCVD and MBE systems are sold to manufacturers of LEDs,electronics, wireless devices, power semiconductors, and concentrator photovoltaics, as well as for R&D applications. Our ALD technology is used by the manufacturers of OLED displays and has further applications in the semiconductor and solar markets.  In 2011 we discontinued the sale of our products related to Copper, Indium, Gallium, Selenide (“CIGS”) solar systems technology.

Our Data Storage segment designs and manufactures systems used to create thin film magnetic heads (“TFMH”s) that read and write data on hard disk drives. These include ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition,drives, and slicing, dicing and lapping systems. While our systems are primarily sold to hard drive customers, they also have applications in optical coatings, micro-electro mechanical systems (“MEMS”) and magnetic sensors, and extreme ultraviolet (“EUV”) lithography.semiconductors.

 

(b) Basis of Presentation

 

We reportThe accompanying audited Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The Company reports interim quarters other than fourth quarters which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday within such period. The interim quarter ends areof each period, which is determined at the beginningstart of each year basedyear. The Company’s fourth quarter always ends on the 13-week quarters. The 2013last day of the calendar year, December 31. During 2016 the interim quarter ends were March 31, June 30 and September 29. The 2012 interim quarter ends were April 1, July 1 and September 30. The 2011 interim quarter ends werequarters ended on April 3, July 3, and October 2. For ease of reference, we report2, and during 2015 the interim quarters ended on March 29, June 28 and September 27. The Company reports these interim quarter endsquarters as March 31, June 30, and September 30 in ourits interim consolidated financial statements. We have reclassified certain amounts previously reported in our financial statements to conform to the current presentation, including amounts related to discontinued operations.

 

(c) Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”)GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date ofin the financial statements and accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the reported amounts of revenuesfuture, these estimates may ultimately differ from actual results. Significant items subject to such estimates and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates made by managementassumptions include: (i) the best estimate of selling price for ourthe Company’s products and services; allowance(ii) allowances for doubtful accounts; (iii) inventory obsolescence; recoverability(iv) the useful lives and useful livesexpected future cash flows of property, plant, and equipment and identifiable intangible assets; investment valuations;(v) the fair value of derivatives;the Company’s reporting unit and related goodwill; (vi) the fair value, less cost to sell, of assets held for sale; (vii) investment valuations and the valuation of derivatives, deferred tax assets, and assets acquired in business combinations; (viii) the recoverability of goodwill and long livedlong-lived assets; recoverability of deferred tax assets;(ix) liabilities for product warranty; accounting for acquisitions; accruals forwarranty and legal contingencies; equity-based payments, including forfeitures(x) share-based compensation; and performance based vesting; and liabilities for(xi) income tax uncertainties. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

(d) Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of Veecothe Company and its subsidiaries. Intercompany itemsbalances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Companies acquired during each reporting period are reflected in the results of the Company effective from their respective dates of acquisition through the end of the reporting period.

 

(e) Foreign Currencies

Assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that operate using local functional currencies are translated using the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Results of operations are translated using monthly average exchange rates. Adjustments arising from the translation of the foreign currency financial statements of the Company’s subsidiaries into U.S. dollars, including intercompany transactions of a long-term nature, are reported as currency translation adjustments in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Foreign currency transaction gains or losses are included in “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

F-9



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

(f) Revenue Recognition

 

We recognizeThe Company recognizes revenue when all of the following criteria have been met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists with a customer; delivery of the specified products has occurred or services have been rendered; prices are contractually fixed or determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recorded including shipping and handling costs and

F-8



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

excluding applicable taxes related to sales. A significant portion of our revenue is derived from contractual arrangements

Contracts with customers that havefrequently contain multiple elements,deliverables, such as systems, upgrades, components, spare parts, maintenance, and service plans. For sales arrangements that contain multiple elements, we splitJudgment is required to properly identify the arrangement into separateaccounting units of the multiple-element arrangements and to determine how the revenue should be allocated among the accounting if the individually delivered elements have value to the customer on a standalone basis. Weunits. The Company also evaluateevaluates whether multiple transactions with the same customer or related partyparties should be considered part of a multiple elementsingle, multiple-element arrangement whereby we assess, among other factors,based on an assessment of whether the contracts or agreements are negotiated or executed within a short time frame of each other or if there are indicators that the contracts are negotiated in contemplation of each other. one another. Moreover, judgment is used in interpreting the commercial terms and determining when all criteria have been met in order to recognize revenue in the appropriate accounting period.

When we havethere are separate units of accounting, we allocatethe Company allocates revenue to each element based on the following selling price hierarchy: vendor-specific objective evidence (“VSOE”) if available; third party evidence (“TPE”) if VSOE is not available; or ourthe best estimate of selling price (“BESP”) if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. We utilizeThe Company uses BESP for the majority of the elements in ourits arrangements. The accounting guidance for selling price hierarchy didmaximum revenue recognized on a delivered element is limited to the amount that is not include BESP for arrangements entered into prior to January 1, 2011, and as such we recognized revenue for those arrangements as described below.contingent upon the delivery of additional items.

 

We considerThe Company considers many facts when evaluating each of ourits sales arrangements to determine the timing of revenue recognition including theits contractual obligations, the customer’s creditworthiness, and the nature of the customer’s post-delivery acceptance provisions. OurThe Company’s system sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally include field acceptance provisions that may include functional or mechanical test procedures. For the majority of ourthe arrangements, a customer source inspection of the system is performed in ourthe Company’s facility or test data is sent to the customer documenting that the system is functioning to the agreed upon specifications prior to delivery. Historically, such source inspection or test data replicates the field acceptance provisions that will beare performed at the customer’s site prior to final acceptance of the system. As such, weWhen the Company objectively demonstratedemonstrates that the criteria specified in the contractual acceptance provisions are achieved prior to delivery, and, therefore, we recognize revenue is recognized upon system delivery since there is no substantive contingency remaining related to the acceptance provisions at that date, subject to the retention amount constraint described below. For new products, new applications of existing products, or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where wethe Company cannot objectively demonstrate that the criteria specified in the contractual acceptance provisions have been achieved prior to delivery, revenue and the associated costs are deferred and fully recognized upon the receipt of final customer acceptance, assuming all other revenue recognition criteria have been met.

 

OurThe Company’s system sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally do not contain provisions for right of return, or forfeiture, refund, or other purchase price concessions.concession. In the rare instances where such provisions are included, we defer all revenue is deferred until such rights expire. The sales arrangements generally include installation. The installation process is not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment since it is not complex; it does not require significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve constructing elaborate interfaces or connections subsequent to factory acceptance. The Company has a demonstrated history of consistently completing installations in a timely manner and can reliably estimate the costs of such activities. Most customers engage the Company to perform the installation services, although there are other third-party providers with sufficient knowledge who could complete these services. Based on these factors, installation is deemed to be inconsequential or perfunctory relative to the system sale as a whole, and as a result, installation service is not considered a separate element of the arrangement. As such, the Company accrues the cost of the installation at the time of revenue recognition for the system.

F-10



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

In many cases ourthe Company’s products are sold with a billing retention, typically 10% of the sales price, (the “retention amount”), which is typically payable by the customer when field acceptance provisions are completed. The amount of revenue recognized upon delivery of a system or upgrade, if any, is limited to the lower of i) the amount billed that is not contingent upon acceptance provisions or ii) the value of the arrangement consideration allocated to the delivered elements, if such sale is part of a multiple-element arrangement.

 

For transactions enteredThe Company’s contractual terms with customers in Japan generally specify that title and risk and rewards of ownership transfer upon customer acceptance. As a result, for customers in Japan, revenue is recognized upon the receipt of written customer acceptance. A distributor is used for almost all sales to customers in Japan. Title passes to the distributor upon shipment; however, due to customary local business practices, the risks and rewards of ownership of the system transfer to the end-customers upon their acceptance. As such, the Company recognizes revenue upon receipt of written acceptance from the end customer.

The Company recognizes revenue related to maintenance and service contracts ratably over the applicable contract term. The Company recognizes revenue from the sales of components, spare parts, and specified service engagements at the time of delivery in accordance with the terms of the applicable sales arrangement.

Incremental direct costs incurred related to the acquisition of a customer contract, such as sales commissions, are expensed as incurred, even if the related revenue is deferred in accordance with the above policy.

(g) Warranty Costs

The Company typically provides standard warranty coverage on its systems for one year from the date of final acceptance by providing labor and parts necessary to repair the systems during the warranty period. The Company accounts for the estimated warranty cost when revenue is recognized on the related system. Warranty cost is included in “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The estimated warranty cost is based on the Company’s historical experience with its systems and regional labor costs. The Company calculates the average service hours by region and parts expense per system utilizing actual service records to determine the estimated warranty charge. The Company updates its warranty estimates on a semiannual basis when the actual product performance or field expense differs from original estimates.

(h) Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs are expenses incurred to move, package, and prepare the Company’s products for shipment and to move the products to a customer’s designated location. These costs are generally comprised of payments to third-party shippers. Shipping and handling costs are included in “Cost of sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

(i) Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and include charges for the development of new technology and the transition of existing technology into prior to January 1, 2011,new products or services.

(j) Advertising Expense

The cost of advertising is expensed as incurred and totaled $0.8 million, $0.9 million, and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

(k) Accounting for Share-Based Compensation

Share-based awards exchanged for employee services are accounted for under the accounting rules for multiple-element arrangements in placefair value method. Accordingly, share-based compensation cost is measured at that time, we deferred the greater ofgrant date based on the retention amount or the relative fair value of the undelivered elements based on VSOE.  When we could not establish VSOE or TPEaward. The expense for all undelivered elements of an arrangement, revenue onawards is recognized over the entire arrangement was deferred untilemployee’s requisite service period (generally the earliervesting period of the point when we did have VSOE for all undelivered elements or the delivery of all elements of the arrangement.

Our sales arrangements, including certain upgrades, generally include installation. The installation process is not deemed essential to the functionality of the equipment since it is not complex; that is, it does not require significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or involve building elaborate interfaces or connections subsequent to factory acceptance. We have a demonstrated history of consistently completing installations in a timely manner and can reliably estimate the costs of such activities. Most customers engage us to perform the installation services, although there are other third-party providers with sufficient knowledge who could complete these services. Based on these factors, we deem the installation of our systems to be inconsequential or perfunctory relative to the system as a whole, and as a result, do not consider such services to be a separate element of the arrangement. As such, we accrue the cost of the installation at the time of revenue recognition for the system.award).

 

F-9F-11



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

In Japan, where our contractual terms with customers generally specify title and risk and rewards of ownership transfer upon customer acceptance, revenue is recognized and the customer is billed upon the receipt of written customer acceptance. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2013, we began using a distributor for almost all of our product and service sales to customers in Japan. Title and risk and rewards of ownership of our system sales still transfer to our end-customers upon their acceptance.  As such, there is no impact to our policy of recognizing revenue upon receipt of written acceptance from the end customer.

Revenue related to maintenance and service contracts is recognized ratably over the applicable contract term.  Component and spare part revenue are recognized at the time of delivery in accordance with the terms of the applicable sales arrangement.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and certain highly liquid investments. Highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased may be classified as cash equivalents. Such items may include liquid money market accounts, U.S. treasuries, government agency securities and corporate debt. The investments that are classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.

Short-Term Investments

We determine the appropriate balance sheet classification of our investments at the time of purchase and evaluate the classification at each balance sheet date. As part of our cash management program, we maintain a portfolio of marketable securities which are classified as available-for-sale. These securities include U.S. treasuries and government agency securities with maturities of greater than three months when purchased. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair market value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in the determination of comprehensive income (loss) and reported in equity. Net realized gains and losses are included in net income (loss).

Accounts Receivable, Net

Accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $2.4 million and $0.5 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We evaluate the collectability of accounts receivable based on a combination of factors. In cases where we become aware of circumstances that may impair a customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations subsequent to the original sale, we will record an allowance against amounts due, and thereby reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount the we reasonably believes will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize an allowance for doubtful accounts based on the length of time the receivables are past due and consideration of other factors such as industry conditions, the current business environment and its historical experience.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of accounts receivable, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and, where appropriate, require that letters of credit be provided on certain foreign sales arrangements. We maintain allowances for potential credit losses and make investments with strong, higher credit quality issuers and continuously monitor the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market.  On a quarterly basis, management assesses the valuation and recoverability of all inventories, classified as materials (which include raw materials, spare parts and service inventory), work-in-process and finished goods.

F-10



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

Materials inventory is used primarily to support the installed tool base and spare parts sales and is reviewed for excess quantities or obsolescence by comparing on-hand balances to historical usage, and adjusted for current economic conditions and other qualitative factors. Historically, the variability of such estimatesCompany has been impacted by customer demand and tool utilization rates.

The work-in-process and finished goods inventory is principally used to support system sales and is reviewed for recoverability by considering whether on hand inventory would be utilized to fulfill the related backlog. As we typically receive deposits for our orders, the variability of this estimate is reduced as customers have a vested interest in the orders they place with us. Recoverability of such inventory is evaluated by monitoring customer demand, current sales trends and product gross margins.  Management also considers qualitative factors such as future product demand based on market outlook, which is based principally upon production requirements resulting from customer purchase orders received with a customer-confirmed shipment date within the next twelve months.  Historically, the variability of these estimates of future product demand has been impacted by backlog cancellations or modifications resulting from unanticipated changes in technology or customer demand.

Following identification of potential excess or obsolete inventory, management evaluates the need to write down inventory balances to its estimated market value, if less than its cost.  Inherent in the estimates of market value are management’s estimates related to our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses, and ultimate realization of potential excess inventory.  Unanticipated changes in demand for our products may require a write down of inventory that could materially affect our operating results.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of an acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired.  We account for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives in accordance with relevant accounting guidance related to goodwill and other intangible assets, which states that goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful lives should not be amortized, but instead tested for impairment at least annually at the reporting unit level.  Our policy is to perform this annual impairment test in the fourth quarter, using a measurement date of October 1st, of each fiscal year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets.

The guidance provides an option for an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not (that is, a likelihood of more than 50%) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. If, after assessing the totality of events or circumstances, an entity determines it is not more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, then performing the two-step impairment test is unnecessary.

If we determine the two-step impairment test is necessary, we are required to determine if it is appropriate to use the operating segment, as defined under guidance for segment reporting, as the reporting unit, or one level below the operating segment, depending on whether certain criteria are met. We have identified five reporting units that are required to be reviewed for impairment. The five reporting units are aggregated into two segments: the VIBE and Mechanical reporting units which are reported in our Data Storage segment; and the MOCVD, MBE and ALD reporting units which are reported in our LED & Solar segment. In identifying the reporting units management considered the economic characteristics of operating segments including the products and services provided, production processes, types or classes of customer and product distribution.

F-11



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

If required, we perform this impairment test by first comparing the fair value of our reporting units to their respective carrying amount. When determining the estimated fair value of a reporting unit, we utilize a discounted future cash flow approach since reported quoted market prices are not available for our reporting units. Developing the estimate of the discounted future cash flow requires significant judgment and projections of future financial performance. The key assumptions used in developing the discounted future cash flows are the projection of future revenues and expenses, working capital requirements, residual growth rates and the weighted average cost of capital. In developing our financial projections, we consider historical data, current internal estimates and market growth trends. Changes to any of these assumptions could materially change the fair value of the reporting unit. We reconcile the aggregate fair value of our reporting units to our adjusted market capitalization as a supporting calculation. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of our common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.

If the carrying value of the reporting units exceed the fair value we would then compare the implied fair value of our goodwill to the carrying amount in order to determine the amount of the impairment, if any.

Definite-Lived Intangible and Long-Lived Assets

Definite-lived intangible assets consist of purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, software licenses and deferred financing costs. Purchased technology consists of the core proprietary manufacturing technologies associated with the products and offerings obtained through acquisition and are initially recorded at fair value. Customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete and software licenses that are obtained in an acquisition are initially recorded at fair value. Other software licenses and deferred financing costs are initially recorded at cost. Intangible assets with definitive useful lives are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives for periods up to 17 years.

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets using the straight-line method for financial statement purposes. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

Long-lived assets, such as property, plant, and equipment and intangible assets with definite useful lives, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, a historical or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flow expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized by the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the fair value of the asset.

Accounting for Acquisitions

Our growth strategy has included the acquisition of businesses. The purchase price of these acquisitions has been determined after due diligence of the acquired business, market research, strategic planning, and the forecasting of expected future results and synergies. Estimated future results and expected synergies are subject to judgment as we integrate each acquisition and attempt to leverage resources.

F-12



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

The accounting for the acquisitions we have made requires that the assets and liabilities acquired, as well as any contingent consideration that may be part of the agreement, be recorded at their respective fair values at the date of acquisition. This requires management to make significant estimates in determining the fair values, especially with respect to intangible assets, including estimates of expected cash flows, expected cost savings and the appropriate weighted average cost of capital. As a result of these significant judgments to be made we often obtain the assistance of independent valuation firms. We complete these assessments as soon as practical after the closing dates. Any excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. Please see our footnote Business Combinations in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cost Method of Accounting for Investments

Investee companies not accounted for under the consolidation or the equity method of accounting are accounted for under the cost method of accounting. Under this method, our share of the earnings or losses of such investee companies are not included in the Consolidated Balance Sheet or Statements of Operations. However, impairment charges are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. If circumstances suggest that the value of the investee company has subsequently recovered, such recovery is not recorded.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

We believe the carrying amounts of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, reflected in the consolidated financial statements approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities. The fair value of our debt, including current maturities, is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis, based on the estimated current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of securities.

Translation of Foreign Currencies

Certain of our international subsidiaries operate using local functional currencies. Foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date, and income and expense accounts and cash flow items are translated at average monthly exchange rates during the respective periods. Net exchange gains or losses resulting from the translation of foreign financial statements and the effect of exchange rates on intercompany transactions of a long-term investment nature are recorded as a separate component of equity in accumulated other comprehensive income. Any foreign currency gains or losses related to transactions are included in operating results.

Environmental Compliance and Remediation

Environmental compliance costs include ongoing maintenance, monitoring and similar costs. Such costs are expensed as incurred. Environmental remediation costs are accrued when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable and the cost can be reasonably estimated.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development costs are charged to expense as incurred and include expenses for the development of new technology and the transition of technology into new products or services.

Warranty Costs

Our warranties are typically valid for one year from the date of final acceptance. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty that we provide for our products. We record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. Our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

F-13



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

Income Taxes

We are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves estimating the actual current tax expense, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and financial reporting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is adjusted by a partial valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. Our net deferred tax assets consist primarily of tax credit carry forwards and timing differences between the book and tax treatment of inventory, acquired intangible assets and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our ability to generate future taxable income.

We record valuation allowances in order to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, we consider a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under the relevant accounting guidance, factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

Relevant accounting guidance addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under such guidance, we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution.

Advertising Expense

The cost of advertising is expensed as of the first showing of each advertisement. We incurred $0.5 million, $0.8 million and $1.4 million in advertising expenses during 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs are costs that are incurred to move, package and prepare our products for shipment and then to move the products to the customer’s designated location. These costs are generally comprised of payments to third-party shippers. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Equity-Based Compensation

We grant equity-based awards, such as stock options and restricted stock or restricted stock units, to certain key employees to create a clear and meaningful alignment between compensation and shareholder return and to enable the employees to develop and maintain a stock ownership position.  While the majority of our equity awards feature time-based vesting, performance-based equity awards, which are awarded from time to time to certain of our key executives, vest as a function of performance, and may also be subject to the recipient’s continued employment which also acts as a significant retention incentive.

Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the date of grant, we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to risk-free interest rate, dividend yield, expected stock-price volatility and option life.

The risk-free rate assumed in valuing the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the expected term of the option. The dividend yield assumption is based on our historical and future expectation of dividend payouts. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on objective data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which results in more subjective accounting estimates.

F-14



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical volatility calculated based on the daily closing prices of our common stock over a period equal to the expected term of the option and implied volatility which utilizes market data of actively traded options on our common stock, which are obtained from public data sources. We believe that the historical volatility of the price of our common stock over the expected term of the option is a strong indicator of the expected future volatility and that implied volatility takes into consideration market expectations of how future volatility will differ from historical volatility. Accordingly, we believe a combination of both historical and implied volatility provides the best estimate of the future volatility of the market price of our common stock.

The expected option term, representing the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, is estimated using a lattice-based model incorporating historical post vest exercise and employee termination behavior.

We estimate forfeitures using our historical experience, which is adjusted over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Because of the significant amount of judgment used in these calculations, it is reasonably likely that circumstances may cause the estimate to change.

We settle the exercise of stock options with newly issued shares.

With respect to grants of performance based awards, we assess the probability that such performance criteria will be met in order to determine the compensation expense.  Consequently, the compensation expense is recognized straight-line over the vesting period. If that assessment of the probability of the performance condition being met changes, we would recognize the impact of the change in estimate in the period of the change. As with the use of any estimate, and due to the significant judgment used to derive those estimates, actual results may vary.

We have elected to treat awards with only service conditions and with graded vesting as one award. Consequently, the total compensation expense is recognized straight-line over the entire vesting period, so long as the compensation cost recognized at any date at least equals the portion of the grant date fair value of the award that is vested at that date.

 

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to compute the estimated fair value of option awards, as well as purchase rights under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Black-Scholes model includes assumptions regarding dividend yields, expected volatility, expected option term, and risk-free interest rates. See Note 15, “Stock Plans,” for additional information.

In addition to stock options, restricted share awards (“RSAs”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with time-based vesting, the Company issues performance share units and awards (“PSUs” and “PSAs”). Compensation cost for PSUs and PSAs is recognized over the requisite service period based on the timing and expected level of achievement of the performance targets. A change in the assessment of the probability of a performance condition being met is recognized in the period of the change in estimate. At the conclusion of the performance period, the number of shares granted may vary based on the level of achievement of the performance targets.

See Note 1(u), “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards,” for additional information concerning the Company’s early adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09: Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.

Negotiable Letters of Credit(l) Income Taxes

 

ForIncome taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities from a change in tax rate is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

See Note 1(u), “Recently Adopted Accounting Standards,” for additional information concerning the Company’s early adoption of ASU 2015-17: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.

(m) Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investments, derivative financial instruments used in hedging activities, and accounts receivable. The Company invests in a variety of financial instruments and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution or commercial issuer. The Company has not experienced any material credit losses on its investments.

The Company maintains an allowance reserve for potentially uncollectible accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The Company evaluates its allowance for doubtful accounts based on a combination of factors. In circumstances where specific invoices are deemed to be uncollectible, the Company provides a specific allowance for bad debt against the amount due to reduce the net recognized receivable to the amount reasonably expected to be collected. The Company also provides allowances based on its write-off history. The allowance for doubtful accounts totaled $0.3 million and $0.2 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

To further mitigate the Company’s exposure to uncollectable accounts, the Company may request certain transactions, we request that our customers provide us with a negotiable irrevocable letter of credit drawn on a reputable financial institution. These irrevocable letters of credit are typically issued to mature on average, for 0 tobetween zero and 90 days postfrom the date the documentation requirements but occasionally for longer. Forare met, typically when a fee, onesystem ships or upon receipt of our banks confirmsfinal acceptance from the reputation of the issuing institution and,customer. The Company, at our option, monetizes these letters of credit on a non-recourse basis soon after they become negotiable. Once we monetize the letter of credit with the confirming bank, we have no further obligations or interest in the letter of credit and they are not included in our consolidated balance sheets. The fees that we pay are included in selling, general and administrative expense and are not material.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or Tax Credit Carryforward Exists: In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11. ASU 2013-11 requires entities to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward when settlement in this manner is available under the tax law. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We are evaluating the potential impact of this adoption on our consolidated financial statements.

Presentation of Financial Statements: In April 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-07, “Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205): Liquidation Basis of Accounting.” The objective of ASU 2013-07 is to clarify when an entity should apply the liquidation basis of accounting. The update provides principles for the recognition and measurement of assets and liabilities and requirements for financial statements prepared using the liquidation basis of accounting. This ASU is effective prospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements, absent any indications that liquidation is imminent.its discretion, may

 

F-15F-12



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

Parent’s Accounting formonetize these letters of credit on a non-recourse basis after they become negotiable, but before maturity. The fees associated with the Cumulative Translation Adjustment: In March 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-05, Parent’s Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investmentmonetization are included in a Foreign Entity. This new standard is intended to resolve diversity in practice regarding the release into net income of a cumulative translation adjustment (“CTA”) upon derecognition of a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity. ASU No. 2013-05 is effective prospectively for fiscal years (and interim reporting periods within those years) beginning after December 15, 2013. We currently anticipate that its adoption could have an impact on our consolidated financial statements,“Selling, general, and administrative” in the eventConsolidated Statements of derecognition of a foreign subsidiary in 2014 or subsequently.  We cannot estimate the amount of CTA to be released into income from any potential derecognition.

Obligations Resulting from JointOperations and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date:  In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-04, “Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date”.  ASU No. 2013-04 provides guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. In addition, ASU No. 2013-04 requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation, as well as other information about the obligations. ASU No. 2013-04 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2013 and is to be applied retrospectively. We do not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

2.  Income (Loss) Per Common Share

The following table sets forth basic and diluted net income (loss) per common share and the basic weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands, except per share data):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(42,263

)

$

30,928

 

$

127,987

 

Net income (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.80

 

$

3.23

 

Diluted

 

$

(1.09

)

$

0.79

 

$

3.11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

38,807

 

38,477

 

39,658

 

Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards and units and convertible debt

 

 

574

 

1,497

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

38,807

 

39,051

 

41,155

 

Basic income (loss) per common share is computed using the basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted income (loss) per common share is computed using the basic weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the effect of approximately 0.6 million common equivalent shares were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive due to the net loss sustained during the period. Potentially dilutive securities attributable to outstanding stock options and restricted stock of approximately 1.3 million, 1.3 million and 0.7 million common equivalent shares during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

During the second quarter of 2011 the entire outstanding principal balance of our convertible debt was converted, with the principal amount paid in cash and the conversion premium paid in shares. The convertible notes met the criteria for determining the effect of the assumed conversion using the treasury stock method of accounting, since we had settled the principal amount of the notes in cash. Using the treasury stock method, it was determined that the impact of the assumed conversioninsignificant for the years ended December 31, 2011 had2016, 2015, and 2014.

(n) Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued expenses reflected in the consolidated financial statements approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities. The fair value of debt for footnote disclosure purposes, including current maturities, is estimated using a dilutive effectdiscounted cash flow analysis based on the estimated current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of 0.6instruments.

(o) Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Short-Term Investments

All financial instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase are considered cash equivalents. Such items may include liquid money market accounts, U.S. treasuries, government agency securities, and corporate debt. Investments that are classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. The Company’s cash and cash equivalents includes $1.5 million shares.and $18.0 million of cash equivalents at December 31, 2016 and 2015 respectively.

A portion of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents is held by its subsidiaries throughout the world, frequently in each subsidiary’s respective functional currency, which is typically the U.S. dollar. Approximately 54% and 50% of cash and cash equivalents were maintained outside the United States at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Marketable securities are generally classified as available-for-sale for use in current operations, if required, and are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, presented as a separate component of stockholders’ equity under the caption “Accumulated other comprehensive income.” These securities can include U.S. treasuries, government agency securities, corporate debt, and commercial paper, all with maturities of greater than three months when purchased. All realized gains and losses and unrealized losses resulting from declines in fair value that are other than temporary are included in “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The specific identification method is used to determine the realized gains and losses on investments.

(p) Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value, with cost determined on a first-in, first-out basis. The Company reviews and sets standard costs on a periodic basis at current manufacturing costs in order to approximate actual costs. The Company assesses the valuation of all inventories, including manufacturing raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods, and spare parts, each quarter. Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of management’s estimated usage requirement is written down to its estimated net realizable value if less than cost. Estimates of net realizable value include, but are not limited to, management’s forecasts related to the Company’s future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, general market conditions, possible alternative uses, and ultimate realization of excess inventory. If future customer demand or market conditions are less favorable than the Company’s projections, additional inventory write-downs may be required and would be reflected in cost of sales in the period the revision is made. Inventory acquired as part of a business combination is recorded at fair value on the date of acquisition. See Note 5, “Business Combinations,” for additional information.

 

F-16F-13



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

3.  Discontinued Operations(Continued)

 

CIGS Solar Systems(q) Business Combinations

 

On July 28, 2011, we announced a plan to discontinue our CIGS solar systems business. The results of operations for the CIGS solar systems business have been recorded as discontinued operations for all periods presented. During the year ended December 31, 2011, total discontinued operations related to the discontinued CIGS business include pre-tax charges totaling $69.8 million. These charges include an asset impairment charge totaling $6.2 million, a goodwill write-off of $10.8 million, an inventory write-off totaling $27.0 million, charges to settle contracts totaling $22.1 million, lease related charges totaling $1.4 million and personnel severance charges totaling $2.3 million.

Metrology

On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker. The results of operations for the Metrology business have been recorded as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The sale transaction closed on October 7, 2010, except for assets located in China due to local restrictions. Total proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment of $1 million, totaled $230.4 million of which $7.2 million relates to the assets in China. During 2010, we recognized a pre-tax gain on disposal of $156.3 million and a pre-tax deferred gain of $5.4 million related to the assets in China.  We recognized into income the pre-tax deferred gain of $5.4 million during 2012 related to the completion of the sale of the assets in China to Bruker. We also recognized a $1.4 million gain ($1.1 million net of taxes) on the sale of assets of this discontinued segment that were previously held for sale and sold during 2012.

Summary information related to discontinued operations is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

2012

 

2011

 

 

 

Solar

 

 

 

 

 

Solar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Systems

 

Metrology

 

Total

 

Systems

 

Metrology

 

Total

 

Net sales

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Net income (loss) from discontinued operations

 

$

(62

)

$

4,461

 

$

4,399

 

$

(61,453

)

$

(1,062

)

$

(62,515

)

4.  Fair Value Measurements

We have categorized our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value based uponCompany allocates the fair value hierarchy. The levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:

·Level 1 inputs utilize quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identicalthe purchase consideration of the Company’s acquisitions to the tangible assets, or liabilities that we have the ability to access.

·Level 2 inputs utilize other-than-quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similarintangible assets, including in-process research and development (“IPR&D”), if any, and liabilities in active markets, and inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

·Level 3 inputs are unobservable and are typicallyassumed, based on our own assumptions, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measureestimated fair value may fall into different levelsvalues. The excess of the fair value hierarchy. Inof purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. IPR&D is initially capitalized at fair value as an intangible asset with an indefinite life and assessed for impairment thereafter. When a project underlying reported IPR&D is completed, the corresponding amount of IPR&D is amortized over the asset’s estimated useful life. Acquisition-related expenses are recognized separately from the business combination and are expensed as incurred in “Selling, General, and Administrative” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 5, “Business Combinations,” for additional information.

(r) Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangibles

Goodwill is an asset representing the future economic benefits arising from assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the consideration transferred over the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are measured at their respective fair values on the acquisition date. Intangible assets related to IPR&D projects are considered to be indefinite-lived until the completion or abandonment of the associated R&D efforts. If and when development is complete, the associated assets would be deemed long-lived and would then be amortized based on their respective estimated useful lives at that point in time. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are not amortized into results of operations but instead are evaluated for impairment. The Company performs the evaluation in the fourth quarter of each year or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.

The Company may first perform a qualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount, and, if so, the Company then applies the two-step impairment test. The two-step impairment test first compares the fair value of the Company’s reporting unit to its carrying amount. If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill is not impaired, and the Company is not required to perform further testing. If the carrying amount exceeds fair value, the Company determines the implied fair value of the goodwill and, if the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then the Company records an impairment loss equal to the difference.

The Company determines the fair value of its reporting unit based on a reconciliation of the fair value of the reporting unit to the Company’s adjusted market capitalization. The adjusted market capitalization is calculated by multiplying the average share price of the Company’s common stock for the last ten trading days prior to the measurement date by the number of outstanding common shares and adding a control premium.

(s) Long-Lived Assets and Cost Method Investment

Long-lived intangible assets consist of purchased technology, customer-related intangible assets, patents, trademarks, covenants not-to-compete, and software licenses and are initially recorded at fair value. Long-lived intangibles are amortized over their estimated useful lives in a method reflecting the pattern in which the economic benefits are consumed or straight-lined if such cases, we categorize such assets or liabilitiespattern cannot be reliably determined.

Property, plant, and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation expense is calculated based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessmentestimated useful lives of the significanceassets by using the straight-line method. Amortization of leasehold improvements is recognized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the remaining lease term or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

Long-lived assets and cost method investments are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a particular inputlong-lived asset or asset group be tested for possible impairment, a recoverability test is performed utilizing undiscounted cash flows expected to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset.

 

F-17F-14



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

Both observablebe generated by that asset or asset group compared to its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, impairment is recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models or, when available, quoted market values, and unobservable inputs maythird-party appraisals.

(t) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The FASB issued ASU 2014-09, as amended: Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which has been codified as Accounting Standards Codification 606 (“ASC 606”). ASC 606 requires the Company’s revenue recognition to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be usedentitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASC 606 outlines a five-step model to determinemake the revenue recognition determination and requires new financial statement disclosures. Publicly-traded companies are required to adopt ASC 606 for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, but can adopt early for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is still finalizing its assessment of the impact of adopting the ASU on its consolidated financial statements and is still evaluating which method of adoption it will select.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01: Financial Instruments — Overall, which requires certain equity investments to be measured at fair value, of positions that are classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets within the Level 3 category presented below may includewith changes in fair value that were attributablerecognized in net income. Publicly-traded companies are required to both observable (e.g. changes in market interest rates) and unobservable (e.g. changes in historical company data) inputs.adopt the ASU for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect this ASU will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

The major categories ofIn February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02: Leases, which generally requires the Company’s operating lessee rights and obligations to be recognized as assets and liabilities on the balance sheet. In addition, interest on lease liabilities is to be recognized separately from the amortization of right-of-use assets in the Statement of Operations. Further, payments of the principal portion of lease liabilities are to be classified as financing activities while payments of interest on lease liabilities and variable lease payments are to be classified as operating activities in the Statement of Cash Flows. The transition to the ASU will require leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented to be recognized and measured using a modified retrospective approach. The ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early application permitted. The Company is evaluating the anticipated impact of adopting the ASU on a recurring basis, at fair value, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

130,977

 

$

 

$

 

$

130,977

 

Corporate debt

 

 

77,601

 

 

77,601

 

Government agency securities

 

 

61,013

 

 

61,013

 

Commercial paper

 

 

11,947

 

 

11,947

 

Derivative instrument

 

 

907

 

 

907

 

Contingent consideration

 

 

 

(29,368

)

(29,368

)

 

 

December 31, 2012 (1)

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

278,698

 

$

 

$

 

$

278,698

 

Government agency securities

 

 

123,054

 

 

123,054

 

Derivative instrument

 

 

248

 

 

248

 


(1)December 31, 2012 table has been conformed to present year presentation.its consolidated financial statements.

 

Highly liquid investments with maturitiesIn August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of three monthsCash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which provides guidance on eight specific cash flow issues, including debt prepayments or less when purchased may be classified as cash equivalents. Such items may include liquid money market accounts, U.S. treasuries, government agency securities and corporate debt.debt extinguishment costs. Publicly-traded companies are required to adopt the update for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The investments that are classified as cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.  Accordingly, no gains or losses (realized/unrealized) have been incurred for cash equivalents. All investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value within short-term investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In determining the fair value of our investments and levels, through a third-party service provider, we use pricing information from pricing services that value securities based on quoted market prices in active markets and matrix pricing. Matrix pricing is a mathematical valuation technique thatCompany does not rely exclusively on quoted prices of specific investments, but on the investment’s relationship to other benchmarked quoted securities. Weexpect this ASU will have a process in place for investment valuations to facilitate identification and resolution of potentially erroneous prices. We review the information provided by the third-party service provider to record the fair value ofmaterial impact on its portfolio.

Consistent with Level 1 measurement principles, U.S. treasuries are priced using active market prices of identical securities. Consistent with Level 2 measurement principles, corporate debt, government agency securities, commercial paper, and derivative instruments are priced with matrix pricing.consolidated financial statements.

 

F-18In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires that entities recognize the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset, other than inventory, when the transfer occurs. Publicly-traded companies are required to adopt the update for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company is evaluating the anticipated effect the ASU will have on its consolidated financial statements.

(u) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09: Stock Compensation: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payments. The Company early adopted the ASU effective January 1, 2016. Beginning in 2016, excess tax benefits and deficiencies are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement in the reporting period incurred. The Company also made an accounting policy election to account for forfeitures when they occur. The ASU transition guidance requires that this election be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the

F-15



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

period in which the ASU is effective. Accordingly, the Company recorded a $1.3 million charge to the opening accumulated deficit balance with a corresponding adjustment to additional paid-in capital, resulting in no impact to the opening balance of total stockholders’ equity. In addition, the Company recorded additional deferred tax assets with an equally offsetting valuation allowance of $2.4 million.

A reconciliationIn November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, which simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring that deferred income tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in our consolidated balance sheet. Publicly-traded companies are required to adopt the update for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with early application permitted. The Company early adopted the ASU effective January 1, 2015. In accordance with the ASU’s transition requirements, the Company chose to apply the amendments in the update prospectively. As such, periods prior to 2015 have not been retrospectively adjusted. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Note 2 — Income (Loss) Per Share

The Company considers unvested share-based awards that have non-forfeitable rights to dividends prior to vesting to be participating shares, which are treated as a separate class of security from the Company’s common shares for calculating per share data. Therefore, the Company applies the two-class method when calculating income (loss) per share. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. However, since the holders of the participating shares are not obligated to fund losses, participating shares are excluded from the calculation of loss per share.

Basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period under the two-class method. Diluted income per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares used to calculate basic income (loss) per share plus the weighted average number of common share equivalents outstanding during the period. The dilutive effect of outstanding options to purchase common stock and non-participating share-based awards is considered in diluted income per share by application of the treasury stock method. The dilutive effect of performance share units is included in diluted income per common share in the periods the performance targets have been achieved. The computations of basic and diluted income (loss) per share for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 are as follows:

F-16



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

2015

 

 

2014

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(122,210

)

 

$

(31,978

)

 

$

(66,940

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

$

(3.11

)

 

$

(0.80

)

 

$

(1.70

)

Diluted

 

$

(3.11

)

 

$

(0.80

)

 

$

(1.70

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic weighted average shares outstanding

 

39,340

 

 

39,742

 

 

39,350

 

Effect of potentially dilutive share-based awards

 

 

 

 

 

 

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

 

39,340

 

 

39,742

 

 

39,350

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unvested participating shares excluded from basic weighted average shares outstanding since the securityholders are not obligated to fund losses

 

312

 

 

1,017

 

 

1,141

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common share equivalents excluded from the diluted weighted average shares outstanding since Veeco incurred a net loss and their effect would be antidilutive

 

107

 

 

146

 

 

339

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Potentially dilutive non-participating shares excluded from the diluted calculation as their effect would be antidilutive

 

1,896

 

 

2,111

 

 

1,123

 

Note 3 — Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received for an asset or the amount paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Company is required to classify certain assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy:

·Level 3 is as follows (1: Quoted prices in thousands):active markets that are unadjusted and accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

 

 

 

Level 3

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

 

$

 

Addition of contingent consideration

 

(33,539

)

Payment on contingent consideration

 

5,000

 

Fair value adjustment of contingent consideration

 

(829

)

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

(29,368

)

·Level 2: Quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or financial instruments for which significant inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly; and

 

We·Level 3: Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company has evaluated the estimated fair value of financial instruments using available market information and valuations as provided by third-party sources. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies could have a significant effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The following table presents the Company’s assets that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2016 and 2015:

F-17



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 

 

 

 

Level 1

 

 

 

Level 2

 

 

 

Level 3

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate debt

 

$

 

$

1,501

 

$

 

$

1,501

 

Total

 

 

1,501

 

 

1,501

 

Short-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

40,008

 

 

 

40,008

 

Government agency securities

 

 

10,012

 

 

10,012

 

Corporate debt

 

 

13,773

 

 

13,773

 

Commercial paper

 

 

2,994

 

 

2,994

 

Total

 

$

40,008

 

$

26,779

 

$

 

$

66,787

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

9,999

 

$

 

$

 

$

9,999

 

Government agency securities

 

 

4,998

 

 

4,998

 

Commercial paper

 

 

2,999

 

 

2,999

 

Total

 

9,999

 

7,997

 

 

17,996

 

Short-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

94,918

 

 

 

94,918

 

Government agency securities

 

 

12,988

 

 

12,988

 

Corporate debt

 

 

8,144

 

 

8,144

 

Total

 

$

94,918

 

$

21,132

 

$

 

$

116,050

 

Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased. These investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. All investments classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value within short-term investments in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s investments classified as Level 1 are based on quoted prices that are available in active markets. The Company’s investments classified as Level 2 are valued using observable inputs to quoted market prices, benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency.

Note 4 — Investments

At December 31, 2016 and 2015 the amortized cost and fair value of marketable securities were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

 

 

Cost

 

 

 

Gains

 

 

 

Losses

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

40,013

 

$

 

$

(5

)

$

40,008

 

Government agency securities

 

10,020

 

 

(8

)

10,012

 

Corporate debt

 

13,780

 

 

(7

)

13,773

 

Commercial paper

 

2,994

 

 

 

2,994

 

Total

 

$

66,807

 

$

 

$

(20

)

$

66,787

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

94,935

 

$

6

 

$

(23

)

$

94,918

 

Government agency securities

 

12,985

 

3

 

 

12,988

 

Corporate debt

 

8,144

 

1

 

(1

)

8,144

 

Total

 

$

116,064

 

$

10

 

$

(24

)

$

116,050

 

F-18



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Available-for-sale securities in a loss position at December 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Losses

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

Losses

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

20,002

 

$

(5

)

$

64,922

 

$

(23

)

Government agency securities

 

10,012

 

(8

)

 

 

Corporate debt

 

13,774

 

(7

)

3,353

 

(1

)

Total

 

$

43,788

 

$

(20

)

$

68,275

 

$

(24

)

At December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were no short-term investments that had been in a continuous loss position for more than 12 months.

The maturities of securities classified as available-for-sale at December 31, 2016 were all due in one year or less. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. There were no realized gains or losses for the year ended December 31, 2016. There were no realized losses and minimal realized gains for 2015 and 2014, which were included in “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Cost Method Investment

The Company has an ownership interest of less than 20% in a non-marketable investment, Kateeva, Inc. (“Kateeva”). The Company does not exert significant influence over Kateeva and therefore the investment is carried at cost. The carrying value of the investment was $21.0 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015. The investment is included in “Other assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The investment is subject to a periodic impairment review; as there are no open-market valuations, the impairment analysis requires judgment. The analysis includes assessments of Kateeva’s financial condition, the business outlook for its products and technology, its projected results and cash flow, business valuation indications from recent rounds of financing, the likelihood of obtaining subsequent rounds of financing, and the impact of equity preferences held by Veeco relative to other investors. Fair value of the investment is not estimated unless there are identified events or changes in circumstances that could have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the contingent consideration by applying various probabilities and discount factors to each of the various performance milestones as further discussed in note Business Combinations. These fair value measurementsinvestment. No such events or circumstances are based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The discount rates used ranged from 3.6% to 13.0% for the purchase order related contingent payments and from 15.5% to 30.5% for the revenue and gross margin related contingent payments. These rates were determined based on the nature of the milestone, the risks and uncertainties involved and the time period until the milestone was measured.present.

We measure certain assets for fair value on a non-recurring basis when there are indications of impairment.

In 2013 and 2012 we measured certain assets consistent with Level 3 measurement principles using an income approach based on a discounted cash flow model in order to determine the amount of impairment, if any. In 2013, we evaluated certain tangible assets in our LED & Solar segment for impairment. As a result of the evaluation we adjusted the carrying value by $0.9 million related to tools that we had previously used in our laboratories held in Property, plant and equipment which we are holding for sale and by $0.3 million related to an asset held in Other assets with $1.2 million of adjustments recorded as impairment in 2013. In 2012, we evaluated an asset in our Data Storage segment for impairment. As a result of the evaluation we adjusted the carrying value of the asset carried in Other assets from $1.4 million to $0.1 million with the $1.3 million adjustment recorded as impairment in 2012.

 

5.Note 5 — Business Combinations

 

On April 4, 2011, we purchased a privately-held company which supplies certain components to one of our businesses for $28.3 million in cash. As a result of this purchase, we acquired $16.4 million of definite-lived intangibles, of which $13.6 million related to core technology, and $14.7 million of goodwill. The financial results of this acquisition are included in our LED & Solar segment as of the acquisition date. We determined that this acquisition does not constitute a material business combination and therefore we have not included pro forma financial information in this report.PSP

 

On October 1, 2013 (“December 4, 2014 the Acquisition Date”), VeecoCompany acquired 100% of Solid State Equipment, LLC (“SSEC”) and rebranded the outstanding common shares and voting interest of Synos Technology, Inc.business Veeco Precision Surface Processing (“Synos”PSP”). The results of Synos’PSP operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. Synos is an early stage manufacturerthe date of fast array scanning atomic layer depositionacquisition. PSP designs and develops wafer wet processing capabilities. Target market applications include semiconductor advanced packaging (including 2.5D and 3D ICs), micro-electromechanical systems (“FAST-ALD”MEMS”) tools for OLED, compound semiconductor (RF, power electronics, LED and other applications. As a resultothers), data storage, photomask, and flat panel displays. PSP further extends the Company’s penetration in the compound semiconductor and MEMS markets and represents the Company’s entry into the advanced packaging market.

The acquisition date fair value of the acquisition,consideration totaled $145.5 million, net of cash acquired, which consisted of the Company has entered the FAST-ALD market which is complimentary to the Company’s MOCVD LED offerings.following:

 

F-19F-19



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 

 

Acquisition Date

 

(December 4, 2014)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Amount paid, net of cash acquired

 

$

145,382

 

Working capital adjustment

 

88

 

Acquisition date fair value

 

$

145,470

 

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date. The Company utilized third-party valuations to estimate the fair value of certain of the acquired tangible and intangible assets:

 

 

Acquisition Date

 

(December 4, 2014)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

9,383

 

Inventory

 

13,812

 

Other current assets

 

463

 

Property, plant, and equipment

 

6,912

 

Intangible assets

 

79,810

 

Total identifiable assets acquired

 

110,380

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 

6,473

 

Customer deposits

 

6,039

 

Deferred tax liability, net

 

2,705

 

Other

 

1,089

 

Total liabilities assumed

 

16,306

 

 

 

 

 

Net identifiable assets acquired

 

94,074

 

Goodwill

 

51,396

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

145,470

 

The gross contractual value of the acquired accounts receivable was approximately $10.5 million. The fair value of the accounts receivables is the amount expected to be collected by the Company. Goodwill generated from the acquisition is primarily attributable to expected synergies from future growth and strategic advantages provided through the expansion of product offerings as well as assembled workforce. Approximately 80% of the value of the goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes.

During 2015, the Company finalized the purchase accounting, including taxes and the working capital adjustment under the purchase agreement. Based on the final adjustments, net working capital increased $0.7 million, goodwill decreased $0.1 million, deferred tax liabilities decreased $0.2 million, and a lease-related asset retirement obligation of $0.8 million was recognized.

F-20



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

The Acquisition Date fair value of the consideration totaled $102.3 million, net of cash acquired, which consisted of the following (in thousands):

 

 

Acquisition Date

 

 

 

(October 1, 2013)

 

Cash (net of cash acquired)

 

$

71,488

 

Working capital adjustment

 

(2,695

)

Contingent consideration

 

33,539

 

Total

 

$

102,332

 

As part of Veeco’s acquisition of Synos, we may be obligated to pay to the selling shareholders of Synos certain contingent consideration. The aggregate fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement at the acquisition date was $33.5 million. The contingency arrangements are generally as follows:

·Up to $40.0 million based on defined milestones tied to the receipt of certain purchase orders from customers by certain dates through the first quarter of 2014. The Company determined the fair value of these contingent payments to be $24.3 million.  Of this amount, $5.0 million was earned and paid in the fourth quarter of 2013.  The second milestone pertaining to this contingency is to be measured by March 31, 2014 and could result in either no payment, a payment of $17.5 million or a payment of $35 million.  The difference between the amount earned and the fair value recorded will be recorded in the statement of operations for the period ended March 31, 2014.  The outcome is currently unknown.

·Up to $75.0 million based on defined milestones tied to meeting certain revenue and gross margin thresholds based on full year 2014 results. The Company has determined the fair value of these contingent payments to be $9.2 million. The fair value of this contingency will continued to be measured at each reporting period and changes in fair value will be recorded in the statement of operations.

We estimated the fair value of the contingent consideration by applying various probabilities and discount factors to each of the various performance milestones. These fair value measurements are based on significant inputs not observable in the market and thus represent a Level 3 measurement as defined in ASC 820. The discount rates used ranged from 3.6% to 13.0% for the purchase order related contingent payments and from 15.5% to 30.5% for the revenue and gross margin related contingent payments. These rates were determined based on the nature of the milestone, the risks and uncertainties involved and the time period until the milestone was measured. The determination of the various probabilities and discount factors are highly subjective and require significant judgment and are influenced by a number of factors, including the adoption of OLED technology and limited history.  While the use of OLED is expected to grow in the near future, it is difficult to predict the rate at which OLED will be adopted by the market and thus would impact the sales of our equipment.

As of December 31, 2013, the first milestone was achieved and we paid the former shareholders of Synos $5.0 million.  In addition, the recognized amount for the contingencies increased by $0.8 million as of December 31, 2013 as a result of changes in the fair value of contingent consideration.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired, net of the cash acquired, and liabilities assumed at the Acquisition Date. Veeco utilized third-party valuations of the tangible and intangible assets acquired as well as the contingent consideration. The amounts below are preliminary and are subject to change (in thousands):

 

 

Acquisition Date

 

 

 

(October 1, 2013)

 

Accounts receivable

 

$

1,523

 

Inventory

 

386

 

Other current assets

 

512

 

Property, plant, and equipment

 

1,917

 

Intangible assets

 

99,270

 

Total identifiable assets acquired

 

103,608

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

4,370

 

Estimated deferred tax liability, net

 

32,426

 

Total liabilities assumed

 

36,796

 

Net identifiable assets acquired

 

66,812

 

Goodwill

 

35,520

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

102,332

 

F-20



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

The $35.5 million of goodwill was assigned to the LED & Solar segment. None of the goodwill is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes. As of December 31, 2013, there were no changes in the recognized amounts of goodwill resulting from the acquisition of Synos.

The classes of intangible assets acquired and the estimated weighted-average useful life of each class is presented in the table below (in thousands):below:

 

 

 

Acquisition Date

 

 

 

(October 1, 2013)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Average useful life

 

Technology

 

$

73,160

 

14 years

 

In-process research and development

 

5,070

 

To be determined

 

Customer relationship

 

20,630

 

8 years

 

Trademark and trade name

 

140

 

1 year

 

Non-compete agreement

 

270

 

3 years

 

Intangible assets acquired

 

$

99,270

 

 

 

 

 

Acquisition Date

 

 

 

(December 4, 2014)

 

 

 

Amount

 

Useful life

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Technology

 

$

39,950

 

10 years

 

Customer relationships

 

34,310

 

14 years

 

Backlog

 

3,340

 

6 months

 

Non-compete agreements

 

1,130

 

2 years

 

Trademark and tradenames

 

1,080

 

1 year

 

Intangible assets acquired

 

$

79,810

 

 

 

 

WeThe Company determined the estimated fair value of the identifiable intangible assets based on various factors including: cost, discounted cash flow, income method, loss-of-revenue/income method, and relief-from-royalty method in determining the purchase price allocation.

 

Technology is being amortized on an accelerated basis consistent withDuring 2014, the timing of the cash flows it is expected to generate. Pursuant to the accounting guidance, acquired in-process research and development is not amortized until such time as it is completed or abandoned. Upon completion, we will amortize the acquired amount over its useful life. As noted earlier, the fair value of the acquired assets is provisional pending the final valuations for these assets.

WeCompany recognized $1.0$3.2 million of acquisition related costs that were expensedare included in 2013. These costs are included“Selling, general, and administrative” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in the line item entitled “Selling, general and administrative.”Operations.

 

The amounts of revenue and income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes of SynosPSP included in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations from the acquisition date (October 1, 2013)(December 4, 2014) to the period ending December 31, 20132014 are as follows (in thousands):follows:

 

 

Total

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Revenue

 

$

409

 

 

$

7,906

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

(6,480

)

Loss from operations before income taxes

 

$

(3,011

)

 

The following represents the unaudited pro forma Consolidated Statements of Operations as if SynosPSP had been included in ourthe Company’s consolidated results (in thousands):

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

(unaudited)

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Revenue

 

$

346,319

 

$

522,029

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

(60,983

)

$

16,840

 

for the periods indicated. These amounts have been calculated after applying ourthe Company’s accounting policies to material amounts and also adjusting the results of SynosPSP to reflect the additional amortization and depreciation that would have been expensed assuming the fair value adjustments to intangiblethe acquired assets had been applied on January 1, 2012.2013:

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Revenue

 

$

447,089

 

Loss from operations before income taxes

 

$

(68,715

)

Note 6 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized. The following table presents the changes in goodwill balances during the years indicated:

 

F-21F-21



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

6.  Balance Sheet Information

 

 

Gross carrying

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

amount

 

 

 

impairment

 

 

 

Net amount

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

238,158

 

$

123,199

 

$

114,959

 

Purchase price adjustments

 

(51

)

 

(51

)

Balance at December 31, 2015 and 2016

 

$

238,107

 

$

123,199

 

$

114,908

 

 

Short-Term Investments

Available-for-sale securities consist of the following (in thousands):

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Gains in

 

Losses in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Comprehensive

 

Comprehensive

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Cost

 

Income

 

Income

 

Fair Value

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

130,956

 

$

22

 

$

(1

)

$

130,977

 

Government agency securities

 

61,004

 

9

 

 

61,013

 

Corporate debt

 

77,582

 

55

 

(36

)

77,601

 

Commercial paper

 

11,947

 

 

 

11,947

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 

$

281,489

 

$

86

 

$

(37

)

$

281,538

 

DuringThe Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test during the year ended December 31, 2013, sales2016. The fair value of the Company’s reporting unit exceeded the carrying amount and maturitiestherefore goodwill was not impaired. In the future, a significant decline in the market price of available-for-sale securities provided total proceedsthe Company’s common stock could indicate a decline in the fair value of $499.6 million. The gross realized gains on these sales were $0.1the Company’s reporting unit such that goodwill becomes impaired.

During 2014, the Company successfully demonstrated its FAST-ALD technology for flexible OLED encapsulation. But, subsequent to the Company’s annual goodwill impairment test in 2014, the incumbent deposition technology had progressed to satisfy current market requirements, which required an additional impairment test to be performed in the fourth quarter of 2014. After estimating the fair value of significant tangible and intangible long-lived assets related to the Atomic Layer Deposition (“ALD”) business, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $28.0 million related to goodwill and $25.9 million related to other long-lived assets, including $17.4 million related to customer relationships, $4.8 million related to in-process research and development, and $3.6 million related to certain tangible assets.

During 2016, the Company decided to further significantly reduce future investments in its ALD technology development and, as a result, recorded non-cash impairment charges of its remaining ALD assets, including $54.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. For purposefull impairment of determining gross realized gains, the cost of securities sold isintangible purchased ALD technology. The impairment charges were based on specific identification. The change inprojected cash flows that required the net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities was minimal for the year ended December 31, 2013, and has been included in accumulated other comprehensive income. The tax impact on the unrealized gains, which is excluded from the table above, was less than $0.1 million.use of unobservable inputs.

 

 

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

Gains in

 

Losses in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

Amortized

 

Comprehensive

 

Comprehensive

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Cost

 

Income

 

Income

 

Fair Value

 

U.S. treasuries

 

$

184,102

 

$

76

 

$

 

$

184,178

 

Government agency securities

 

8,056

 

 

 

8,056

 

Total available-for-sale securities

 

$

192,158

 

$

76

 

$

 

$

192,234

 

The components of purchased intangible assets were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

December 31, 2015

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Remaining

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

Net

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

Net

 

 

 

Period

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

Impairment

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

Impairment

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

(in years)

 

(in thousands)

 

Technology

 

7.3

 

$

149,198

 

$

113,904

 

$

35,294

 

$

222,358

 

$

120,496

 

$

101,862

 

Customer relationships

 

11.9

 

47,885

 

28,659

 

19,226

 

47,885

 

22,470

 

25,415

 

Trademarks and tradenames

 

4.3

 

2,590

 

1,948

 

642

 

2,730

 

1,937

 

793

 

Indefinite-lived trademark

 

 

2,900

 

 

2,900

 

2,900

 

 

2,900

 

Other

 

2.9

 

2,026

 

1,710

 

316

 

6,241

 

5,537

 

704

 

Total

 

8.9

 

$

204,599

 

$

146,221

 

$

58,378

 

$

282,114

 

$

150,440

 

$

131,674

 

 

During the year ended December 31, 2012, salesOther intangible assets primarily consist of patents, licenses, customer backlog, and maturities of available-for-sale securities provided total proceeds of $244.9 million. The gross realized gains on these sales were minimal for the year ended December 31, 2012. For purpose of determining gross realized gains, the cost of securities sold is based on specific identification. The change in the net unrealized holding gain on available-for-sale securities amounted to $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, and has been included in accumulated other comprehensive income. The tax impact on the unrealized gains, which is excluded from the table above, was minimal.non-compete agreements.

 

F-22F-22



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

Available-for-sale securities in a loss positionBased on the intangible assets recorded at December 31, 20132016, and assuming no subsequent additions to or impairment of the underlying assets, the remaining estimated annual amortization expense is expected to be as follows:

 

 

 

 

Amortization

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

$

11,470

 

2018

 

9,893

 

2019

 

8,608

 

2020

 

7,530

 

2021

 

5,491

 

Thereafter

 

12,486

 

Total

 

$

55,478

 

Note 7 — Inventories

Inventories are as follows (in thousands):stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value using standard costs that approximate actual costs on a first-in, first-out basis. Inventories consist of the following:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Materials

 

$

46,457

 

$

42,373

 

Work-in-process

 

25,250

 

30,327

 

Finished goods

 

5,356

 

4,769

 

Total

 

$

77,063

 

$

77,469

 

Note 8 — Property, Plant, and Equipment and Assets Held for Sale

Property and equipment, net, consist of the following:

 

 

December 31,

 

Average

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

Useful Life

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Land

 

$

5,669

 

$

9,592

 

N/A

 

Building and improvements

 

50,814

 

54,622

 

10-40 years

 

Machinery and equipment(1)

 

99,370

 

110,075

 

3-10 years

 

Leasehold improvements

 

3,652

 

5,554

 

3-7 years

 

Gross property, plant and equipment

 

159,505

 

179,843

 

 

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

98,859

 

100,253

 

 

 

Net property, plant and equipment

 

$

60,646

 

$

79,590

 

 

 

(1) Machinery and equipment also includes software, furniture and fixtures

 

 

 

Less than 12 months

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

Gross

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

Fair value

 

Losses

 

Fair value

 

Losses

 

Corporate debt

 

$

37,654

 

$

(36

)

$

37,654

 

$

(36

)

U.S. treasuries

 

29,068

 

(1

)

29,068

 

(1

)

Total

 

$

66,722

 

$

(37

)

$

66,722

 

$

(37

)

As ofDepreciation expense was $13.4 million, $12.2 million, and $11.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 we had $66.72016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. During 2016, the Company decided to significantly reduce future investments in its ALD technology development and, as a result, recorded a charge for impairment of its ALD assets, including a $3.3 million in short-term investments that had an aggregate unrealized fair value lossimpairment of less than $0.1 million none of which had been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or longer. As of December 31, 2012 we did not hold any short-term investments that were in a loss position.

Contractual maturities of available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 2013 are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

196,015

 

Due in 1–2 years

 

64,156

 

Due in 2–3 years

 

21,367

 

Total investments in securities

 

$

281,538

 

Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because some borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Restricted Cashproperty, plant, and equipment.

 

As part of the Company’s efforts to reduce costs, enhance efficiency and streamline operations, the Company removed certain lab equipment that is no longer required and recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $6.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, restricted cash consisted2016. Additionally, as part of $2.7 million and $2.0 million, respectively, which serves as collateral for bank guarantees that provide financial assurance thatinitiative, the Company will fulfill certain customer obligations. This cash is heldlisted its two facilities in custody by the issuing bank, and is restricted as to withdrawal or use while the related bank guarantees are outstanding.

Accounts Receivable, Net

Accounts receivable are shown net of the allowanceSouth Korea for doubtful accounts of $2.4 million and $0.5 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

F-23F-23



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

Inventories (in thousands)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Materials

 

$

34,301

 

$

36,523

 

Work in process

 

12,900

 

13,363

 

Finished goods

 

12,525

 

9,921

 

 

 

$

59,726

 

$

59,807

 

Property, Plantsale. When each facility was reclassified as held for sale, the Company determined that the carrying values of the buildings exceeded their fair market values, less cost to sell, and Equipment (in thousands)

 

 

December 31,

 

Estimated

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Useful Lives

 

Land

 

$

12,535

 

$

12,535

 

 

 

Building and improvements

 

52,050

 

49,498

 

10-40 years

 

Machinery and equipment

 

110,228

 

110,150

 

3-10 years

 

Leasehold improvements

 

5,888

 

5,677

 

3-7 years

 

Gross property, plant and equipment at cost

 

180,701

 

177,860

 

 

 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

91,562

 

79,558

 

 

 

Net property, plant and equipment

 

$

89,139

 

$

98,302

 

 

 

Forrecorded net impairment charges of $4.5 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, depreciation expense was $12.9 million, $11.3 million and $8.2 million, respectively.2016. Both facilities were sold before the end of 2016 at prices that approximated the revised carrying values.

 

AsThe Company also has a property in St. Paul, Minnesota that was classified as held for sale in 2014. At that time, the Company determined that the carrying value of this property exceeded the fair value, less cost to sell, and recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, we had $7.22014. The Company continued to classify the property as held for sale throughout 2015. In early 2016, the Company recorded an additional impairment charge of approximately $1.2 million to reflect changes in market conditions that impacted the fair value of toolsthe assets. The Company continues to actively market the property for sale. However, the Company can no longer make the assessment that we previously used in our laboratories carried in machinerythe assets will be sold within the next twelve months. As such, the land and building no longer meet the criteria to be classified as assets held for sale on the balance sheet and were reclassified to “Property, plant and equipment, which we are holding for sale. These tools are the same type of tools we sell to our customersnet” in the ordinary courseConsolidated Balance Sheets at its carrying value of our business. In addition,$3.6 million, which approximates its fair market value.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company classified certain property, plant, and equipment related to the Company’s research and demonstration labs in Asia as held for sale, and recorded an impairment charge of approximately $1.6 million. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company sold these assets for $1.0 million, which approximated carrying value.

Finally, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we converted and sold $3.7 million of tools that we had previously used in our laboratories as Veeco Certified Equipment at an aggregate selling price of $7.4 million which is included in revenue. During 2013, we recorded2014, the Company recognized additional asset impairment charges in LED & Solar of $0.9$0.7 million relatedrelating to certain tools used in our laboratories carried in machineryassets that were abandoned during the year.

Note 9 — Accrued Expenses and equipment which we are holding for sale.Other Liabilities

The components of accrued expenses and other current liabilities were as follows:

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Payroll and related benefits

 

$

18,780

 

$

30,917

 

 

 

 

 

Warranty

 

4,217

 

8,159

 

 

 

 

 

Professional fees

 

1,827

 

2,224

 

 

 

 

 

Installation

 

1,382

 

1,110

 

 

 

 

 

Sales, use, and other taxes

 

1,282

 

1,132

 

 

 

 

 

Restructuring liability

 

1,796

 

824

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

3,917

 

5,027

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

33,201

 

$

49,393

 

 

 

 

 

 

GoodwillCustomer deposits and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assetsdeferred revenue

 

In accordance withCustomer deposits totaled $22.2 million and $28.2 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, which are included in “Customer deposits and deferred revenue” in the relevant accounting guidance related to goodwill and other intangible assets, we conducted our annual impairment test of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth quarters of 2013 and 2012, using October 1st as our measurement date as described in our footnote Description of Business and Significant Accounting Policies. Based upon the results of the qualitative assessment we determined that it was not more likely than not that goodwill or our indefinite-lived intangible assets were impaired. Therefore, we determined that no impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset existed as of October 1, 2013. In 2012, we determined not to perform the optional qualitative assessment and performed our step 1 assessment utilizing discounted future cash flows and a reconciliation to our market capitalization. Based on our assessment we determined that there was no impairment of our goodwill or our indefinite-lived assets as of October 1, 2012.Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Changes in our goodwill are as follows (in thousands):Note 10 — Restructuring Charges

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Beginning balance

 

$

55,828

 

$

55,828

 

Acquisition (see Business Combinations)

 

35,520

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

91,348

 

$

55,828

 

During 2016, additional accruals were recognized and payments made related to previous years’ restructuring initiatives. In addition, in 2016, the Company undertook additional restructuring activities as part of its initiative to streamline operations, enhance efficiency, and reduce costs. As a result of these actions, the Company notified approximately 50 employees of their termination from the Company and recorded restructuring charges related to these actions of $4.4 million, consisting of $3.3 million of personnel severance and related costs and $1.1 million of facility closing costs. In

 

F-24F-24



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)(Continued)

addition, the Company decided to significantly reduce future investments in its ALD technology development, which impacted approximately 25 additional employees. As a result, the Company recorded personnel severance and related restructuring charges of $1.2 million. Over the next year, the Company expects to incur additional restructuring costs of $2 million to $5 million as it finalizes all of these activities.

During 2015, charges of $2.7 million were recognized and payments made related to the 2014 closing of the Ft. Collins, Colorado and Camarillo, California facilities. In 2015, the Company announced the closing of its Hyeongok-ri, South Korea facility and reduced the workforce, including 23 employees whose positions were eliminated, resulting in restructuring costs of $1.1 million. And in an effort to better align the Company’s cost structure with the then recently observed weakness in the LED market, the Company incurred $0.9 million to reduce spending primarily through the reduction of 16 employees and 12 temporary staff.

During 2014, the Company announced the closing of its Ft. Collins, Colorado and Camarillo, California facilities. Business activities formerly conducted at these sites were transferred to the Company’s Plainview, New York facility, and the Company recorded $0.4 million of facility closing costs. The Company also took additional measures to improve profitability and notified 93 employees of their termination from the Company and recorded $4.0 million of personnel severance and related costs. These actions were substantially complete at the end of 2014.

The following table shows the amounts incurred and paid for restructuring activities during the years ended December 31, 20132016, 2015, and 2014 and the remaining accrued balance of restructuring costs at December 31, 2016, which is included in “Accrued expenses and other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets:

 

 

 

 

Personnel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Severance and

 

 

 

Facility

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related Costs

 

 

 

Related Costs

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

533

 

$

 

$

533

 

Provision

 

4,012

 

382

 

4,394

 

Payments

 

(3,117

)

(382

)

(3,499

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

1,428

 

 

1,428

 

Provision

 

3,513

 

1,166

 

4,679

 

Payments

 

(4,117

)

(1,166

)

(5,283

)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

824

 

 

824

 

Provision

 

4,544

 

1,098

 

5,642

 

Changes in estimate

 

(2

)

 

(2

)

Payments

 

(3,570

)

(1,098

)

(4,668

)

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

1,796

 

$

 

$

1,796

 

Note 11 — Commitments and Contingencies

 

Intangible AssetsWarranty

 

AsWarranties are typically valid for one year from the date of December 31, 2013, we had $8.0 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets consisting of trademarks, tradenamessystem final acceptance, and in-process researchthe Company estimates the costs that may be incurred under the warranty. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and development (“IPR&D”). Pursuanthistorical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs and is affected by product failure rates, material usage, and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to acquisition guidance, IPR&D is carried as an indefinite lived intangible until abandonment or completion. As of December 31, 2012, we had $2.9 million of indefinite-lived intangible assets consisting of trademarks and tradenames. These intangibles are includedwarranty costs.

Changes in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets in the caption intangible assets, net.

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Purchased

 

intangible

 

intangible

 

Purchased

 

intangible

 

intangible

 

(in thousands)

 

technology

 

assets

 

assets

 

technology

 

assets

 

assets

 

Gross intangible assets

 

$

187,478

 

$

40,675

 

$

228,153

 

$

109,248

 

$

19,635

 

$

128,883

 

Less accumulated amortization

 

(97,524

)

(15,913

)

(113,437

)

(93,436

)

(14,473

)

(107,909

)

Intangible assets, net

 

$

89,954

 

$

24,762

 

$

114,716

 

$

15,812

 

$

5,162

 

$

20,974

 

The estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets with definite useful lives for each of the next five fiscal years isCompany’s product warranty reserves were as follows (in thousands):

2014

 

$

11,569

 

2015

 

19,376

 

2016

 

18,498

 

2017

 

15,876

 

2018

 

12,244

 

Other Assets

 

 

December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Cost method investment

 

$

16,884

 

$

14,494

 

Income taxes receivable

 

21,128

 

 

Other

 

714

 

2,287

 

 

 

$

38,726

 

$

16,781

 

Cost Method Investment

On September 28, 2010, we completed a $3 million investment in a rapidly developing organic light emitting diode (also known as OLED) equipment company (the “Investment”). We invested an additional $10.3 million and $1.2 million in the Investment during 2012 and 2011, respectively. In 2013, we invested an additional $2.4 million in the Investment in the form of bridge notes bearing 4% interest. The bridge notes are payable in equity at the time of a liquidity event or a qualifying equity investment round, otherwise they are payable in cash in June 2014.  As of December 31, 2013, we have a 15.4% ownership of the preferred shares, and effectively hold a 11.0% ownership interest of the total company. Since we do not exert significant influence on the Investment, this investment is treated under the cost method in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. This investment is recorded in other assets in our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.follows:

 

F-25F-25



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)(Continued)

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance, beginning of the year

 

$

8,159

 

$

5,411

 

$

5,662

 

Addition for new warranties issued

 

3,916

 

7,873

 

3,484

 

Addition from PSP acquisition

 

 

 

809

 

Settlements

 

(6,433

)

(3,551

)

(3,802

)

Changes in estimate

 

(1,425

)

(1,574

)

(742

)

Balance, end of the year

 

$

4,217

 

$

8,159

 

$

5,411

 

Minimum Lease Commitments

Minimum lease commitments at December 31, 20132016 for property and equipment under operating lease agreements (exclusive of renewal options) are payable as follows:

 

 

Operating

 

 

 

Leases

 

Payments due by period:

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

$

3,281

 

2018

 

2,292

 

2019

 

1,900

 

2020

 

1,592

 

2021

 

1,203

 

Thereafter

 

3,605

 

Total

 

$

13,873

 

Lease expense was $2.5 million, $2.3 million, and $2.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. In addition, the Company is obligated under such leases for certain other expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance.

 

Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

 

 

December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Payroll and related benefits

 

$

11,020

 

$

14,581

 

Sales, use and other taxes

 

5,402

 

6,480

 

Contingent consideration

 

20,098

 

 

Warranty

 

5,662

 

4,942

 

Restructuring liability

 

533

 

1,875

 

Other

 

8,369

 

13,523

 

 

 

$

51,084

 

$

41,401

 

Customer deposits and deferred revenueLegal Proceedings

 

AsVeeco and certain other parties were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed on April 25, 2013 in the Superior Court of December 31, 2013California, County of Sonoma. The plaintiff in the lawsuit, Patrick Colbus, sought unspecified damages and 2012, we had customer depositsasserted claims that he suffered burns and other injuries while cleaning a molecular beam epitaxy system alleged to have been manufactured by Veeco. The lawsuit alleged, among other things, that the molecular beam epitaxy system was defective and that Veeco failed to adequately warn of $27.5 million and $32.7 million, respectively recorded asthe potential risks of the system. In April 2016, the parties settled the lawsuit, without any admission of wrongdoing. The settlement amount was fully covered by Veeco’s insurance.

The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a componentmaterial adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of customer deposits and deferred revenue.operations, or cash flows.

 

Accrued WarrantyConcentrations of Credit Risk

 

Typically, we provide ourThe Company depends on purchases from its ten largest customers, a one year manufacturer’s warranty from the datewhich accounted for 73% and 75% of final acceptance on the products they purchase from us. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty we providenet accounts receivable at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Customers who accounted for our products and recognize a liability in the amountmore than 10% of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Factors that affect our warranty liability include product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. Changes in our warranty liability during the yearnet accounts receivable or net sales are as follows:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Balance as of the beginning of year

 

$

4,942

 

$

8,731

 

Warranties issued during the year

 

5,291

 

3,563

 

Settlements made during the year

 

(5,580

)

(7,060

)

Changes in estimate during the period

 

1,009

 

(292

)

Balance as of the end of year

 

$

5,662

 

$

4,942

 

Other Liabilities

 

 

December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2013

 

2012

 

Contingent consideration

 

$

9,270

 

$

 

Income taxes payable

 

 

3,986

 

Other

 

379

 

544

 

 

 

$

9,649

 

$

4,530

 

F-26F-26



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)(Continued)

 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

Customer

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Customer A

 

23%

 

*

 

13%

 

*

 

*

Customer B

 

17%

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

Customer C

 

*

 

23%

 

*

 

*

 

*

Customer D

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

20%

 

*

Customer E

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

12%

 

*

Customer F

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

15%

Customer G

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

11%

* Less than 10% of aggregate accounts receivable or net sales

The Company manufactures and sells its products to companies in different geographic locations. Refer to Note 18, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information,” for additional information. In certain instances, the Company requires deposits from its customers for a portion of the sales price in advance of shipment and performs periodic credit evaluations on its customers. Where appropriate, the Company requires letters of credit on certain non-U.S. sales arrangements. Receivables generally are due within 30 to 90 days from the date of invoice.

Suppliers

The Company outsources certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of its MOCVD systems. While the Company primarily relies on one supplier for the manufacturing of these systems, the Company maintains a minimum level of internal manufacturing capability for these systems. The failure of the Company’s present suppliers to meet their contractual obligations under its supply arrangements and the Company’s inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues, profitability, cash flows, and relationships with its customers.

In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in the Company’s products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. The Company’s inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

The Company had deposits with its suppliers of $7.8 million and $14.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, that were included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Purchase Commitments

The Company had purchase commitments of $72.6 million at December 31, 2016, all of which will come due within one year. Purchase commitments are primarily for inventory used in manufacturing products. The Company have $7.8 million of offsetting supplier deposits against these purchase commitments as of December 31, 2016.

Bank Guarantees

The Company has bank guarantees and letters of credit issued by a financial institution on its behalf as needed. At December 31, 2016, outstanding bank guarantees and letters of credit totaled $5.0 million, and unused bank guarantees and letters of credit of $59.4 million were available to be drawn upon.

F-27



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

December 31, 2013Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 

Note 12 — Debt

As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, debt consists of a mortgage note payable with a carrying value of $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively. See Note 20, “Subsequent Events,” for information concerning the Company’s issuance of $345.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.7% convertible senior unsecured notes due 2023 in January 2017. The mortgage note payable is secured by certain land and buildings with a carrying value of $3.3 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015. The annual interest rate on the mortgage is 7.91%, and the final payment is due on January 1, 2020. The Company determined the mortgage is a Level 3 liability in the fair-value hierarchy and estimated its fair value as $1.2 million and $1.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, using a discounted cash flow model. Payments due under the note are as follows:

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

368

 

2018

 

 

398

 

2019

 

 

428

 

Total

 

 

1,194

 

Less current portion

 

 

368

 

Total (less current maturities)

 

 

$

826

 

See Note 20, “Subsequent Events,” for additional information regarding the Company’s Convertible Notes.

Note 13 — Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to financial market risks arising from changes in currency exchange rates. Changes in currency exchange rate changes could affect the Company’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities and forecasted cash flows. The Company entered into monthly forward derivative contracts with the intent of mitigating a portion of this risk. The Company only used derivative financial instruments in the context of hedging and not for speculative purposes and had not designated its foreign exchange derivatives as hedges. Accordingly, changes in fair value from these contracts were recorded as “Other, net” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company executed derivative transactions with highly rated financial institutions to mitigate counterparty risk.

The Company did not have any outstanding derivative contracts at December 31, 2016 and 2015. The following table shows the gains and (losses) from currency exchange derivatives during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, which are included in “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

 

$

219

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(89

)

Foreign currency collar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(457

)

Total

 

 

$

219

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(546

)

Note 14 — Stockholders’ Equity

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

 

The componentsfollowing table presents the changes in the balances of accumulated other comprehensive income are:

As of December 31, 2013

 

Gross

 

Taxes

 

Net

 

Translation adjustments

 

$

5,718

 

$

(392

)

$

5,326

 

Minimum pension liability

 

(1,160

)

424

 

(736

)

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

 

49

 

(18

)

31

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

4,607

 

$

14

 

$

4,621

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

Gross

 

Taxes

 

Net

 

Translation adjustments

 

$

7,040

 

$

(339

)

$

6,701

 

Minimum pension liability

 

(1,285

)

510

 

(775

)

Unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities

 

76

 

(29

)

47

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 

$

5,831

 

$

142

 

$

5,973

 

7.  Debt

Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt aseach component of December 31, 2013, consistsAOCI, net of a mortgage note payable, which is secured by certain land and buildings with carrying amounts aggregating approximately $4.7 million and $4.8 million as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The mortgage note payable ($2.1 million as of December 31, 2013 and $2.4 million as of December 31, 2012) bears interest at an annual rate of 7.91%, with the final payment due on January 1, 2020. We estimate the fair market value of this note as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $2.3 million and $2.6 million, respectively.

Maturity of Long-Term Debttax:

 

Long-term debt matures as follows (in thousands):F-

2014

 

$

290

 

2015

 

314

 

2016

 

340

 

2017

 

368

 

2018

 

398

 

Thereafter

 

427

 

 

 

2,137

 

Less current portion

 

290

 

 

 

$

1,847

 

Convertible Notes

In 2011, we retired our convertible notes which were initially convertible into 36.7277 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to a conversion price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for Veeco’s common stock on April 16, 2007). We paid interest on these notes on April 15 and October 15 of each year. The notes were unsecured and were effectively subordinated to all of our senior and secured indebtedness and to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries.

F-2728



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)(Continued)

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Currency

 

 

 

Minimum Pension

 

 

 

Gains (Losses) on
Available for Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translation

 

 

 

Liability

 

 

 

Securities

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

 

$

5,326

 

 

 

$

(736

)

 

 

$

31

 

 

 

$

4,621

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

149

 

 

 

(145

)

 

 

51

 

 

 

55

 

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

 

(3,142

)

 

 

 

 

 

(65

)

 

 

(3,207

)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(2,993

)

 

 

(145

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(3,152

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

 

2,333

 

 

 

(881

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

1,469

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(87

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

(49

)

 

 

(121

)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

2,246

 

 

 

(866

)

 

 

(32

)

 

 

1,348

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), before reclassifications

 

 

(19

)

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(25

)

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

 

(430

)

 

 

866

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

454

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(449

)

 

 

866

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

429

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

$

1,797

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(20

)

 

 

$

1,777

 

The Company did not allocate additional tax expense (benefit) to other comprehensive income (loss) for all years presented as the Company is in a full valuation allowance position such that a deferred tax asset related to amounts recognized in other comprehensive income is not regarded as realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.

 

During 2016, the first quarterCompany finalized the process to terminate a defined benefit plan. As a result, the Company reclassified the minimum pension liability of 2011, at$0.9 million, net of a tax benefit of $0.4 million, from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the optionConsolidated Balance Sheets to “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally the holders, $7.5Company completed its plan to liquidate its ALD subsidiary in Korea. As a result of this liquidation, a cumulative translation gain of $0.4 million was reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” to “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of notes were tendered for conversion at a price of $45.95 per share in a net share settlement. We paid the principal amount of $7.5 million in cash and issued 111,318 shares of our common stock. We recorded a loss on extinguishment totaling $0.3 million related to these transactions.Operations.

 

During the second quarter of 2011, we issued a notice of redemption on the remaining outstanding principal balance of notes outstanding. As a result, at the option of the holders, the notes2015, there were tendered for conversion at a price of $50.59 per share, calculated as definedminimal realized gains reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the indenture relatingConsolidated Balance Sheets to the notes, in a net share settlement. As a result, we paid the principal amount of $98.1 million in cash and issued 1,660,095 shares of our common stock. We recorded a loss on extinguishment totaling $3.0 million related to these transactions.

Certain accounting guidance requires a portion of convertible debt to be allocated to equity. This guidance requires issuers of convertible debt that can be settled in cash to separately account for (i.e. bifurcate) a portion of the debt associated with the conversion feature and reclassify this portion to equity. The liability portion, which represents the fair value of the debt without the conversion feature, is accreted to its face value over the life of the debt using the effective interest method by amortizing the discount between the face amount and the fair value. The amortization is recorded as interest expense. Our convertible notes were subject to this accounting guidance. This additional interest expense did not require the use of cash.

The components of interest expense recorded on the notes were as follows (in thousands):

 

 

For the year ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

Contractual interest

 

$

2,025

 

Accretion of the discount on the notes

 

1,260

 

Total interest expense on the notes

 

$

3,285

 

Effective interest rate

 

6.7

%

8.  Equity Compensation Plans and Equity

Stock Option and Restricted Stock Plans

We have several stock option and restricted stock plans. In connection with our acquisition of Synos Technology, Inc. on October 1, 2013, the Board of Directors granted equity awards to the Synos employees. Pursuant to Nasdaq Listing Rules, the equity awards were granted under our 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan (the “Inducement Plan”), which the Board of Directors adopted to facilitate the granting of equity awards as an inducement to these employees to commence employment with us. We issued 124,500 stock options and 87,000 restricted stock units under this plan. The stock options will vest over a three year period and have a 10-year term and the restricted stock units will vest over a two or four year period. As of December 31, 2013, the Inducement Plan was effectively merged into the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended to date, the “2010 Plan”), and is therefore considered an inactive plan with no further shares available for future grant. As of December 31, 2013, there are 124,500 options outstanding under the Inducement Plan.

On April 1, 2010, our Board of Directors, and on May 14, 2010, our shareholders, approved the 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan replaced the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2000 Plan”), as the Company’s active stock plan. Our employees, directors and consultants are eligible to receive awards under the 2010 Plan. The 2010 Plan permits the granting of a variety of awards, including both non-qualified and incentive stock options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units and dividend equivalent rights. We are authorized to issue up to 6,750,000 shares under the 2010 Plan, including an additional 3,250,000 shares (including up to 2,995,000 shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the 2010 Plan and up to 255,000 shares underlying awards granted under the Inducement Plan) that were approved by the shareholders on December 10, 2013. Option awards are generally granted with an exercise price equal to the closing price of our stock on the trading day prior to the date of grant; those option awards generally vest over a 3 year period and have a 7 or 10-year term. Restricted share awards generally vest over 1-5 years. Certain option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control, as defined“Other, net” in the 2010 Plan. AsConsolidated Statements of December 31, 2013, there are 1,746,092 options outstanding under the 2010 Plan.

F-28



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

The 2000 Plan was approved by our Board of Directors and shareholders in May 2000. The 2000 Plan provides for the grant to officers and key employees of stock awards, either in the form of options to purchase shares of our common stock or restricted stock awards. Stock awards granted pursuant to the 2000 Plan expire after seven years and generally vest over a two-year to five-year period following the grant date. In addition, the 2000 Plan provides for automatic annual grants of restricted stock to each member of our Board of Directors who is not an employee. As of December 31, 2013, there are 727,552 options outstanding under the 2000 Plan.

Equity-Based Compensation Expense, Stock Option and Restricted Stock Activity

Equity-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period.  We recorded equity compensation expense of $13.1 million, $14.3 million and $12.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We did not capitalize any equity compensation in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, we discontinued our CIGS solar systems business and as a result the equity-based compensation expense related to each CIGS solar systems business employee has been classified as discontinued operations in determining the consolidated results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011. For the year ended December 31, 2011 discontinued operations included compensation expense of $0.7 million.

As of December 31, 2013, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards and option awards expected to vest is $33.2 million and $12.3 million, respectively, and the related weighted average period over which it is expected that such unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized is approximately 3.1 years and 2.2 years for the nonvested stock awards and for option awards, respectively.

The fair value of each option granted during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Weighted-average expected stock-price volatility

 

48

%

59

%

55

%

Weighted-average expected option life

 

5 years

 

5 years

 

4 years

 

Average risk-free interest rate

 

1.27

%

0.70

%

1.40

%

Average dividend yield

 

0

%

0

%

0

%

A summary of our restricted stock awards including restricted stock units as of December 31, 2013 is presented below:

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Shares

 

Grant-Date

 

 

 

(000’s)

 

Fair Value

 

Nonvested as of December 31, 2012

 

693

 

$

36.11

 

Granted

 

798

 

33.16

 

Vested

 

(207

)

32.44

 

Forfeited (including cancelled awards)

 

(126

)

34.33

 

Nonvested as of December 31, 2013

 

1,158

 

$

34.93

 

F-29



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we granted 797,583 shares of restricted common stock and restricted stock units to key employees, which generally vest over a four year period. Included in this grant were 16,165 shares of restricted common stock granted to the non-employee members of the Board of Directors, which vest over the lesser of one year or at the time of the next annual meeting. The vested shares include the impact of 71,342 shares of restricted stock which were cancelled in 2013 due to employees electing to receive fewer shares in lieu of paying withholding taxes. The total fair value of shares that vested during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $7.9 million, $5.4 million and $9.7 million, respectively.

A summary of our stock option plans as of the year ended December 31, 2013 is presented below:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

Remaining

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Aggregate

 

Contractual

 

 

 

Shares

 

Exercise

 

Intrinsic

 

Life

 

 

 

(000’s)

 

Price

 

Value (000’s)

 

(in years)

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2012

 

2,322

 

$

28.63

 

 

 

 

 

Granted

 

539

 

32.68

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

(149

)

14.74

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited (including cancelled options)

 

(114

)

35.22

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding as of December 31, 2013

 

2,598

 

$

29.98

 

$

14,277

 

6.5

 

Options exercisable as of December 31, 2013

 

1,567

 

$

27.19

 

$

13,208

 

4.7

 

The weighted-average grant date fair value of stock options granted for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $13.47, $15.56 and $21.90 per option, respectively. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $2.5 million, $6.8 million and $22.8 million, respectively.

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2013:

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

 

 

 

Number

 

Weighted-Average

 

Weighted-

 

Number

 

Weighted-

 

 

 

Outstanding at

 

Remaining

 

Average

 

Exercisable at

 

Average

 

 

 

December 31,

 

Contractual Life

 

Exercise

 

December 31,

 

Exercise

 

Range of Exercise Prices

 

2013 (000s)

 

(in years)

 

Price

 

2013 (000s)

 

Price

 

$8.82 - 16.37

 

432

 

2.4

 

$

10.98

 

432

 

$

10.98

 

17.48 - 26.69

 

296

 

2.2

 

19.85

 

278

 

19.55

 

28.60 - 42.96

 

1,601

 

8.2

 

33.43

 

674

 

34.27

 

44.09 - 51.70

 

269

 

7.4

 

51.02

 

183

 

50.96

 

 

 

2,598

 

6.5

 

$

29.98

 

1,567

 

$

27.19

 

Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

As of December 31, 2013, we have 5,856,268 shares reserved for future issuance upon exercise of stock options and grants of restricted stock.Operations.

 

Preferred Stock

 

OurThe Board of Directors has authority under ourthe Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to issue shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01, with voting and economic rights to be determined by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 2016 no preferred shares have been issued.

 

F-30



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

Treasury StockConcentrations of Credit Risk

 

On August 24, 2010, our BoardThe Company depends on purchases from its ten largest customers, which accounted for 73% and 75% of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $200 million of our common stock. All funds for this repurchase program were exhausted as of August 19, 2011. Repurchases were made from time to time on the open market in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. During 2011, we purchased 4,160,228 shares for $162 million (including transaction costs) under the programnet accounts receivable at an average cost of $38.96 per share. During 2010, we purchased 1,118,600 shares for $38 million (including transaction costs) under the program at an average cost of $34.06 per share. This stock repurchase is included as treasury stock in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2011. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we cancelled2016 and retired the 5,278,828 shares of treasury stock we purchased under this repurchase program. As a result of this transaction, we recorded a reduction in treasury stock of $200.2 million and a corresponding reduction of $200.1 million and $0.1 million in retained earnings and common stock,2015, respectively.

 

9.  Income TaxesCustomers who accounted for more than 10% of net accounts receivable or net sales are as follows:

 

Our income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations consists of (in thousands):F-

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Domestic

 

$

(84,942

)

$

5,811

 

$

230,204

 

Foreign

 

13,732

 

32,375

 

41,882

 

 

 

$

(71,210

)

$

38,186

 

$

272,086

 

Significant components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations are presented below (in thousands):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

$

(21,022

)

$

2,515

 

$

59,921

 

Foreign

 

3,921

 

7,576

 

10,714

 

State and local

 

148

 

(317

)

805

 

Total current provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

(16,953

)

9,774

 

71,440

 

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

(11,589

)

(482

)

10,454

 

Foreign

 

(462

)

727

 

(1,073

)

State and local

 

57

 

1,638

 

763

 

Total deferred provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

(11,994

)

1,883

 

10,144

 

Total provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

$

(28,947

)

$

11,657

 

$

81,584

 

The following is a reconciliation of the income tax provision (benefit) computed using the Federal statutory rate to our actual income tax provision (in thousands):

F-3126



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Income tax provision (benefit) at U.S. statutory rates

 

$

(24,923

)

$

13,366

 

$

95,231

 

State income tax expense (benefit), net of federal impact

 

(1,554

)

(89

)

1,616

 

Nondeductible expenses

 

195

 

622

 

(749

)

Domestic production activities deduction

 

1,554

 

(489

)

(4,581

)

Nondeductible compensation

 

11

 

205

 

841

 

Research and development tax credit

 

(3,151

)

(3,013

)

(4,675

)

Net change in valuation allowance

 

2,420

 

2,943

 

121

 

Change in accrual for unrecognized tax benefits

 

577

 

533

 

824

 

Foreign tax rate differential

 

(4,275

)

(2,387

)

(5,225

)

Other

 

199

 

(34

)

(1,819

)

Total provision (benefit) for income taxes

 

$

(28,947

)

$

11,657

 

$

81,584

 

 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

Customer

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Customer A

 

23%

 

*

 

13%

 

*

 

*

Customer B

 

17%

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

Customer C

 

*

 

23%

 

*

 

*

 

*

Customer D

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

20%

 

*

Customer E

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

12%

 

*

Customer F

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

15%

Customer G

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

11%

 

On January 2, 2013, the American Taxpayer Relief Act* Less than 10% of 2012 was signed into law, and this legislation retroactively extended the research and development tax credit for 2 years, from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2013. Income tax benefit for 2013 includes $1.9 million for the entire benefit of the research and development tax credit attributable to 2012.aggregate accounts receivable or net sales

 

DuringThe Company manufactures and sells its products to companies in different geographic locations. Refer to Note 18, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information,” for additional information. In certain instances, the fourth quarterCompany requires deposits from its customers for a portion of 2012, we determined that we may not meet the criteria requiredsales price in advance of shipment and performs periodic credit evaluations on its customers. Where appropriate, the Company requires letters of credit on certain non-U.S. sales arrangements. Receivables generally are due within 30 to receive a90 days from the date of invoice.

Suppliers

The Company outsources certain incentive tax rate pursuantfunctions to a negotiated tax holiday inthird parties, including the manufacture of its MOCVD systems. While the Company primarily relies on one foreign jurisdiction. Although we are continuing to negotiate the criteriasupplier for the incentive,manufacturing of these systems, the Company maintains a minimum level of internal manufacturing capability for financial reporting purposes wethese systems. The failure of the Company’s present suppliers to meet their contractual obligations under its supply arrangements and the Company’s inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems could have recorded additional tax provisionsa material adverse effect on the Company’s revenues, profitability, cash flows, and relationships with its customers.

In addition, certain of $0.9the components and sub-assemblies included in the Company’s products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. The Company’s inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect the Company’s operating results.

The Company had deposits with its suppliers of $7.8 million and $4.0$14.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, that were included in 2013“Prepaid expenses and 2012, respectively, totaling $4.9 million which representsother current assets” on the cumulative effect of calculating the tax provision using the incentive tax rate as compared to the foreign country’s statutory rate. If we successfully renegotiate the incentive criteria, this additional tax provision could be reversed as a future benefit in the period in which the successful negotiations are finalized.Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.Purchase Commitments

 

On October 1, 2013, we acquired 100%The Company had purchase commitments of Synos’s total outstanding stock. In connection with the acquisition, we recorded a $32.4$72.6 million deferred tax liability related to the difference between the financial reporting amount and the tax basisat December 31, 2016, all of the assets acquired.which will come due within one year. Purchase commitments are primarily for inventory used in manufacturing products. The Company have $7.8 million of offsetting supplier deposits against these purchase commitments as of December 31, 2016.

 

During 2012, we recordedBank Guarantees

The Company has bank guarantees and letters of credit issued by a current tax benefitfinancial institution on its behalf as needed. At December 31, 2016, outstanding bank guarantees and letters of $2.1credit totaled $5.0 million, relatedand unused bank guarantees and letters of credit of $59.4 million were available to equity-based compensation which was a credit to additional paid in capital. We did not record any tax benefits related to equity-based compensation during 2013.  We will credit $0.5 million to additional paid-in capital when the research and development credits are realized for financial reporting purposes.be drawn upon.

 

F-32F-27



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

Significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):Note 12 — Debt

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory valuation

 

$

6,983

 

$

6,386

 

Domestic net operating loss carry forwards

 

5,585

 

1,144

 

Tax credit carry forwards

 

12,566

 

4,145

 

Foreign net operating loss carry forwards

 

821

 

 

Warranty and installation accruals

 

3,002

 

2,174

 

Equity compensation

 

10,638

 

9,114

 

Other accruals

 

2,556

 

3,270

 

Other

 

1,160

 

760

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

43,311

 

26,993

 

Valuation allowance

 

(7,753

)

(4,708

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

35,558

 

22,285

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased intangible assets

 

45,208

 

9,973

 

Undistributed earnings

 

1,737

 

1,095

 

Depreciation

 

4,711

 

7,014

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

51,656

 

18,082

 

Net deferred taxes

 

$

(16,098

)

$

4,203

 

No provision has been made as of December 31, 2013 for United States or additional foreign withholding taxes on approximately $101.0 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries because it is the present intention of management to permanently reinvest the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries in China, South Korea, Malaysia, Singapore and Taiwan. As it is our intention to reinvest those earnings permanently, it is not practicable to estimate the amount of tax that might be payable if they were remitted. In the fourth quarter of 2013, we changed our assertion relating to Japan and such earnings will no longer be permanently reinvested based on the future liquidation of our Japanese entity. We have provided deferred income taxes and future withholding taxes on the earnings that we anticipate will be remitted.

 

As of December 31, 2013, we have credit carry forwards2016 and 2015, debt consists of approximately $12.6a mortgage note payable with a carrying value of $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively. See Note 20, “Subsequent Events,” for financial reporting purposes, consisting primarilyinformation concerning the Company’s issuance of foreign tax credits, which expire between 2022$345.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.7% convertible senior unsecured notes due 2023 in January 2017. The mortgage note payable is secured by certain land and 2023, federal researchbuildings with a carrying value of $3.3 million at December 31, 2016 and development credits which expire between 20312015. The annual interest rate on the mortgage is 7.91%, and 2033,the final payment is due on January 1, 2020. The Company determined the mortgage is a Level 3 liability in the fair-value hierarchy and various state tax credits which expireestimated its fair value as $1.2 million and $1.6 million at various dates through 2028.December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, using a discounted cash flow model. Payments due under the note are as follows:

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

368

 

2018

 

 

398

 

2019

 

 

428

 

Total

 

 

1,194

 

Less current portion

 

 

368

 

Total (less current maturities)

 

 

$

826

 

See Note 20, “Subsequent Events,” for additional information regarding the Company’s Convertible Notes.

 

Our valuation allowanceNote 13 — Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company is exposed to financial market risks arising from changes in currency exchange rates. Changes in currency exchange rate changes could affect the Company’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities and forecasted cash flows. The Company entered into monthly forward derivative contracts with the intent of approximately $7.8 millionmitigating a portion of this risk. The Company only used derivative financial instruments in the context of hedging and not for speculative purposes and had not designated its foreign exchange derivatives as hedges. Accordingly, changes in fair value from these contracts were recorded as “Other, net” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of December 31, 2013 increased by approximately $3.0 million during the year then ended.Operations. The increase relates primarilyCompany executed derivative transactions with highly rated financial institutions to state and local deferred tax assets of $1.6 million and foreign tax attributes of $1.4 million for which we could not conclude were realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.mitigate counterparty risk.

 

F-33The Company did not have any outstanding derivative contracts at December 31, 2016 and 2015. The following table shows the gains and (losses) from currency exchange derivatives during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, which are included in “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

 

$

219

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(89

)

Foreign currency collar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(457

)

Total

 

 

$

219

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(546

)

Note 14 — Stockholders’ Equity

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents the changes in the balances of each component of AOCI, net of tax:

F-28



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

Beginning balance as of December 31

 

$

5,818

 

$

4,748

 

Additions for tax positions related to current year

 

324

 

435

 

Reductions for tax positions related to current year

 

 

 

Additions for tax positions related to prior years

 

477

 

742

 

Reductions for tax positions related to prior years

 

(224

)

(59

)

Reductions due to the lapse of the applicable statute of limitations

 

 

(48

)

Settlements

 

(167

)

 

Ending balance as of December 31

 

$

6,228

 

$

5,818

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Currency

 

 

 

Minimum Pension

 

 

 

Gains (Losses) on
Available for Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translation

 

 

 

Liability

 

 

 

Securities

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

 

$

5,326

 

 

 

$

(736

)

 

 

$

31

 

 

 

$

4,621

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

149

 

 

 

(145

)

 

 

51

 

 

 

55

 

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

 

(3,142

)

 

 

 

 

 

(65

)

 

 

(3,207

)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(2,993

)

 

 

(145

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(3,152

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

 

2,333

 

 

 

(881

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

1,469

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(87

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

(49

)

 

 

(121

)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

2,246

 

 

 

(866

)

 

 

(32

)

 

 

1,348

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), before reclassifications

 

 

(19

)

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(25

)

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

 

(430

)

 

 

866

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

454

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(449

)

 

 

866

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

429

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

$

1,797

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(20

)

 

 

$

1,777

 

 

We doThe Company did not anticipateallocate additional tax expense (benefit) to other comprehensive income (loss) for all years presented as the Company is in a full valuation allowance position such that our uncertaina deferred tax position will change significantly within the next twelve months subject to the completion of our ongoing federal tax audit and any resultant settlement.

Of the amounts reflected in the table above as of December 31, 2013, the entire amount if recognized would reduce our effective tax rate.  It is our policy to recognize interest and penaltiesasset related to amounts recognized in other comprehensive income tax matters in income tax expense. The total accrual for interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $0.8 million and $0.5 millionis not regarded as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We or one of our subsidiaries file income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and various state, local and foreign jurisdictions. All material federal income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2006 subject to subsequent utilization of net operating losses generated in such years. Our 2010 federal tax return is currently under examination. All material state and local income tax matters have been reviewed through 2008 with one state jurisdiction currently under examination for open tax years between 2007 and 2011. The majority of our foreign jurisdictions have been reviewed through 2009. Principally all of our foreign jurisdictions remain open with respect to the 2010 through 2013 tax years.

10.  Commitments and Contingencies and Other Matters

Restructuring and Other Chargesrealizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.

 

During 2011 through 2013, in response2016, the Company finalized the process to challenging business conditions, we initiated activities to reduce and contain spending, including reducing our workforce, consultants and discretionary expenses.

In conjunction with these activities, we recognized restructuring chargesterminate a defined benefit plan. As a result, the Company reclassified the minimum pension liability of approximately $1.5$0.9 million, $3.8net of a tax benefit of $0.4 million, and $1.3 million during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we also recorded inventory write-offs of $1.0 million related to a discontinued product line in our Data Storage segment and $0.8 million related to a discontinued product line in our LED & Solar segment, respectively. These inventory write-offs are included in cost of salesfrom “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the accompanyingConsolidated Balance Sheets to “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally the Company completed its plan to liquidate its ALD subsidiary in Korea. As a result of this liquidation, a cumulative translation gain of $0.4 million was reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” to “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

Restructuring expense forDuring 2015, there were minimal realized gains reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Other, net” in thousands):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Personnel severance and related costs

 

$

1,485

 

$

3,040

 

$

1,288

 

Equity compensation and related costs

 

 

414

 

 

Lease-related and other

 

 

359

 

 

 

 

$

1,485

 

$

3,813

 

$

1,288

 

F-34



Tablethe Consolidated Statements of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013Operations.

 

Personnel Severance and Related CostsPreferred Stock

 

During 2013, we recorded $1.5 million in personnel severanceThe Board of Directors has authority under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to issue shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01, with voting and related costs resulting fromeconomic rights to be determined by the restructuringBoard of one of our international sales offices and the consolidation of certain sales, business and administrative functions. During 2012, we recorded $3.0 million in personnel severance and related costs resulting from a headcount reduction of 52 employees. During 2011, we recorded $1.3 million in personnel severance and related costs related to a companywide reorganization resulting in a headcount reduction of 65 employees. These reductions in workforce included executives, management, administration, sales and service personnel and manufacturing employees’ companywide.

Lease-Related and Other

During 2012, we recorded $0.4 million in other associated costs resulting from a headcount reduction of 52 employees. These charges primarily consist of job placement services, consulting and relocation expenses, as well as duplicate wages incurred during the transition period.

The following is a reconciliation of the liability for the 2013, 2012 and 2011 restructuring charges through December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 

 

LED & Solar

 

Data Storage

 

Unallocated

 

Total

 

Short-term liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2011

 

$

 

$

178

 

$

536

 

$

714

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Personnel severance and related costs 2011

 

672

 

51

 

311

 

1,034

 

Personnel severance and related costs 2012

 

874

 

1,684

 

135

 

2,693

 

Personnel severance and related costs 2013

 

1,017

 

410

 

58

 

1,485

 

Short-term/long-term reclassification 2011

 

 

58

 

 

58

 

Cash payments 2011

 

(138

)

(159

)

(553

)

(850

)

Cash payments 2012

 

(960

)

(504

)

(310

)

(1,774

)

Cash payments 2013

 

(1,282

)

(1,368

)

(177

)

(2,827

)

Balance as of December 31, 2013

 

$

183

 

$

350

 

$

 

$

533

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term liability

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance as of January 1, 2011

 

$

 

$

58

 

$

 

$

58

 

Short-term/long-term reclassification 2011

 

 

(58

)

 

(58

)

Balance as of December 31, 2011

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Minimum Lease Commitments

Minimum lease commitments asDirectors. As of December 31, 2013 for property and equipment under operating lease agreements (exclusive of renewal options) are payable as follows (in thousands):

2014

 

$

3,076

 

2015

 

2,091

 

2016

 

1,327

 

2017

 

1,052

 

2018

 

536

 

 

 

$

8,082

 

Rent amounted to $2.9 million, $3.5 million and $2.7 million in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, we are obligated under such leases for certain other expenses, including real estate taxes and insurance.2016 no preferred shares have been issued.

 

F-35



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

Environmental Remediation

We are aware that petroleum hydrocarbon contamination has been detected in the soil at the site of a facility formerly leased by us in Santa Barbara, California. We have been indemnified for any liabilities we may incur which arise from environmental contamination at the site. Even without consideration of such indemnification, we do not believe that any material loss or expense is probable in connection with any such liabilities. The former owner of the land and building in Santa Barbara, California in which our former Metrology operations were located, which business (sold to Bruker on October 7, 2010), has disclosed that there are hazardous substances present in the ground under the building. Management believes that the comprehensive indemnification clause that was part of the purchase contract relating to the purchase of such land provides adequate protection against any environmental issues that may arise. We have provided Bruker indemnification as part of the sale.

Litigation

Veeco and certain other parties were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed on April 25, 2013 in the Superior Court of California, County of Sonoma. The plaintiff in the lawsuit, Patrick Colbus, seeks unspecified damages and asserts claims that he suffered burns and other injuries while he was cleaning a molecular beam epitaxy system alleged to have been manufactured by Veeco. The lawsuit alleges, among other things, that the molecular beam epitaxy system was defective and that Veeco failed to adequately warn of the potential risks of the system. Veeco believes this lawsuit is without merit and intends to defend vigorously against the claims.  Veeco is unable to predict the outcome of this action or to reasonably estimate the possible loss or range of loss, if any, arising from the claims asserted therein.  The Company believes that, in the event of any recovery by the plaintiff from Veeco, such recovery would be fully covered by Veeco’s insurance.

We are involved in various other legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

 

Our businessThe Company depends in large part upon the capital expenditures of our topon purchases from its ten largest customers, which accounted for 69%73% and 77%75% of totalnet accounts receivable as ofat December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Of such, LED & Solar and Data Storage customers accounted for approximately 30% and 39%, and 56% and 21%, respectively, of total accounts receivable as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

Customers who accounted for more than 10% of our aggregatenet accounts receivable or net sales are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

Net Sales for the year ended

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

Customer

 

Segment

 

2013

 

2012

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Customer A

 

Data Storage

 

23

%

16

%

*

 

14

%

*

 

Customer B

 

Data Storage

 

11

%

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

Customer C

 

LED & Solar

 

10

%

16

%

14

%

*

 

*

 

Customer D

 

LED & Solar

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

11

%

Customer E

 

LED & Solar

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

12

%


* Less than 10% of aggregate accounts receivable or net sales.

F-36F-26



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

 

 

Accounts Receivable

 

Net Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

Customer

 

2016

 

2015

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

Customer A

 

23%

 

*

 

13%

 

*

 

*

Customer B

 

17%

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

Customer C

 

*

 

23%

 

*

 

*

 

*

Customer D

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

20%

 

*

Customer E

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

12%

 

*

Customer F

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

15%

Customer G

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

*

 

11%

We manufacture

* Less than 10% of aggregate accounts receivable or net sales

The Company manufactures and sell oursells its products to companies in different geographic locations. Refer to Note 18, “Segment Reporting and Geographic Information,” for additional information. In certain instances, we requirethe Company requires deposits from its customers for a portion of the sales price in advance of shipment. We performshipment and performs periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and, whereon its customers. Where appropriate, require thatthe Company requires letters of credit be provided on certain foreignnon-U.S. sales arrangements. Receivables generally are due within 30-9030 to 90 days other than receivables generated from customers in Japan where payment terms generally range from 60-150 days. Our net accounts receivable balance is concentrated in the following geographic locations (in thousands):date of invoice.

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

China

 

$

4,845

 

$

28,132

 

Singapore

 

3,192

 

7,266

 

Taiwan

 

553

 

6,390

 

Other

 

6,162

 

3,853

 

Asia Pacific

 

14,752

 

45,641

 

Americas

 

7,526

 

13,917

 

Europe, Middle East and Africa

 

1,545

 

3,611

 

 

 

$

23,823

 

$

63,169

 

 

Suppliers

 

We currently outsourceThe Company outsources certain functions to third parties, including the manufacture of all or substantially all of our newits MOCVD systems, Data Storage systems and ion sources. Wesystems. While the Company primarily relyrelies on several suppliersone supplier for the manufacturing of these systems. We plan to maintain somesystems, the Company maintains a minimum level of internal manufacturing capability for these systems. The failure of ourthe Company’s present suppliers to meet their contractual obligations under ourits supply arrangements and ourthe Company’s inability to make alternative arrangements or resume the manufacture of these systems ourselves could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s revenues, profitability, cash flows, and relationships with ourits customers.

 

In addition, certain of the components and sub-assemblies included in ourthe Company’s products are obtained from a single source or a limited group of suppliers. OurThe Company’s inability to develop alternative sources, if necessary, could result in a prolonged interruption in supply or a significant increase in the price of one or more components, which could adversely affect ourthe Company’s operating results.

 

The Company had deposits with its suppliers of $7.8 million and $14.6 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, that were included in “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Purchase Commitments

 

As of December 31, 2013, weThe Company had purchase commitments totaling $60.3of $72.6 million at December 31, 2016, all of which will come due within one year. WePurchase commitments are primarily for inventory used in manufacturing products. The Company have $9.4$7.8 million of offsetting supplier deposits against these purchase commitments as of December 31, 2013.2016.

 

Lines of Credit andBank Guarantees

 

AsThe Company has bank guarantees and letters of December 31, 2013, we had letter of credit and bank guarantees issued by a bankfinancial institution on ourits behalf as needed. We hadAt December 31, 2016, outstanding bank guarantees and letters of credit outstanding of $0.6totaled $5.0 million, and unused bank guarantees outstanding of $5.9 million, of which, $2.7 million is collateralized against cash that is restricted from use. As of December 31, 2013, we had $40.4 million of unused linesand letters of credit available. The line of credit is$59.4 million were available to draw upon to cover performance bonds as required by our customers.

11.  Foreign Operations, Geographic Area and Product Segment Informationbe drawn upon.

 

Net sales which are attributed to the geographic location in which the customer facility is located and long-lived tangible assets related to operations in the United States and other foreign countries as of and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 are as follows (in thousands):F-

F-3727



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

 

 

Net Sales to Unaffiliated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Customers

 

Long-Lived Tangible Assets

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Americas (1)

 

$

57,609

 

$

83,317

 

$

100,635

 

$

66,002

 

$

74,497

 

$

67,788

 

Europe, Middle East and Africa (1)

 

21,941

 

41,708

 

57,617

 

95

 

36

 

203

 

Asia Pacific (1)

 

252,199

 

390,995

 

820,883

 

23,042

 

23,769

 

20,417

 

 

 

$

331,749

 

$

516,020

 

$

979,135

 

$

89,139

 

$

98,302

 

$

88,408

 

Note 12 — Debt

 


(1) For the year endedAs of December 31, 2013, net sales to customers2016 and 2015, debt consists of a mortgage note payable with a carrying value of $1.2 million and $1.5 million, respectively. See Note 20, “Subsequent Events,” for information concerning the Company’s issuance of $345.0 million in China were 44.8%aggregate principal amount of total net sales. For the year ended2.7% convertible senior unsecured notes due 2023 in January 2017. The mortgage note payable is secured by certain land and buildings with a carrying value of $3.3 million at December 31, 2012, net sales to customers2016 and 2015. The annual interest rate on the mortgage is 7.91%, and the final payment is due on January 1, 2020. The Company determined the mortgage is a Level 3 liability in Chinathe fair-value hierarchy and Taiwan were 42.0%estimated its fair value as $1.2 million and 11.4% of total net sales, respectively. For the year ended$1.6 million at December 31, 2011, net sales to customers in China were 66.4% of total net sales. No other country in Europe, Middle East,2016 and Africa (“EMEA”) and Asia Pacific (“APAC”) accounted2015, respectively, using a discounted cash flow model. Payments due under the note are as follows:

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

2017

 

 

368

 

2018

 

 

398

 

2019

 

 

428

 

Total

 

 

1,194

 

Less current portion

 

 

368

 

Total (less current maturities)

 

 

$

826

 

See Note 20, “Subsequent Events,” for more than 10% of our net sales foradditional information regarding the years presented. A minimal amount, less than 1%, of sales included within the Americas caption above have been derived from other regions outside of the United States.Company’s Convertible Notes.

 

We have five identified reporting units that we aggregate into two reportable segments: the VIBE and Mechanical reporting units which are reported in our Data Storage segment; and the MOCVD, MBE and ALD reporting units are reported in our LED & Solar segment.  We manage the business, review operating results and assess performance, as well as allocate resources, based upon our reporting units that reflect the market focus of each business. The LED & Solar segment consists of metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) systems, molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) systems, thermal deposition sources and other types of deposition systems as well as newly acquired atomic layer deposition (“ALD”) technology. These systems are primarily sold to customers in the LED, OLED and solar industries, as well as to scientific research customers. This segment has product development and marketing sites in Somerset, New Jersey, Poughkeepsie, New York, St. Paul, Minnesota, Fremont, California, and Korea. During 2011 we discontinued our CIGS solar systems business, located in Tewksbury, Massachusetts and Clifton Park, New York. The Data Storage segment consists of the ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond-like carbon, physical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing products sold primarily to customers in the data storage industry. This segment has product development and marketing sites in Plainview, New York, Ft. Collins, Colorado and Camarillo, California.

We evaluate the performance of our reportable segments based on income (loss) from operations before interest, income taxes, amortization and certain items (“segment profit (loss)”), which is the primary indicator used to plan and forecast future periods. The presentation of this financial measure facilitates meaningful comparison with prior periods, as management believes segment profit (loss) reports baseline performance and thus provides useful information. Certain items include restructuring expenses, asset impairment charges, inventory write-offs, equity-based compensation expense and other non-recurring items. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of critical accounting policies.Note 13 — Derivative Financial Instruments

 

The Company is exposed to financial market risks arising from changes in currency exchange rates. Changes in currency exchange rate changes could affect the Company’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities and forecasted cash flows. The Company entered into monthly forward derivative contracts with the intent of mitigating a portion of this risk. The Company only used derivative financial instruments in the context of hedging and not for speculative purposes and had not designated its foreign exchange derivatives as hedges. Accordingly, changes in fair value from these contracts were recorded as “Other, net” in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company executed derivative transactions with highly rated financial institutions to mitigate counterparty risk.

The Company did not have any outstanding derivative contracts at December 31, 2016 and 2015. The following tables present certain data pertaining to our reportable product segmentstable shows the gains and a reconciliation of segment profit (loss) to income (loss)(losses) from continuing operations, before income taxes forcurrency exchange derivatives during the years ended December 31, 2013, 20122016, 2015, and 2011, and goodwill and total assets as2014, which are included in “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):Operations:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

 

$

219

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(89

)

Foreign currency collar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(457

)

Total

 

 

$

219

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(546

)

Note 14 — Stockholders’ Equity

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents the changes in the balances of each component of AOCI, net of tax:

 

F-38F-28



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

Storage

 

Unallocated

 

Total

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

249,742

 

$

82,007

 

$

 

$

331,749

 

Segment loss

 

$

(26,362

)

$

(671

)

$

(22,588

)

$

(49,621

)

Interest income (expense), net

 

 

 

602

 

602

 

Amortization

 

(4,233

)

(1,294

)

 

(5,527

)

Equity-based compensation

 

(5,126

)

(1,703

)

(6,301

)

(13,130

)

Restructuring

 

(1,017

)

(410

)

(58

)

(1,485

)

Asset impairment charge

 

(1,174

)

(46

)

 

(1,220

)

Changes in contingent consideration

 

(829

)

 

 

(829

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

(38,741

)

$

(4,124

)

$

(28,345

)

$

(71,210

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

363,181

 

$

152,839

 

$

 

$

516,020

 

Segment profit (loss)

 

$

41,603

 

$

25,414

 

$

(4,919

)

$

62,098

 

Interest income (expense), net

 

 

 

974

 

974

 

Amortization

 

(3,586

)

(1,322

)

 

(4,908

)

Equity-based compensation

 

(5,400

)

(1,920

)

(6,534

)

(13,854

)

Restructuring

 

(1,233

)

(2,521

)

(59

)

(3,813

)

Asset impairment charge

 

 

(1,335

)

 

(1,335

)

Other

 

 

(976

)

 

(976

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

31,384

 

$

17,340

 

$

(10,538

)

$

38,186

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net sales

 

$

827,797

 

$

151,338

 

$

 

$

979,135

 

Segment profit (loss)

 

$

267,059

 

$

38,358

 

$

(8,987

)

$

296,430

 

Interest income (expense), net

 

 

 

(824

)

(824

)

Amortization

 

(3,227

)

(1,424

)

(83

)

(4,734

)

Equity-based compensation

 

(3,473

)

(1,458

)

(7,876

)

(12,807

)

Restructuring

 

(204

)

(12

)

(1,072

)

(1,288

)

Asset impairment charge

 

(584

)

 

 

(584

)

Other

 

(758

)

 

 

(758

)

Loss on extinguishment of debt

 

 

 

(3,349

)

(3,349

)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

258,813

 

$

35,464

 

$

(22,191

)

$

272,086

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign Currency

 

 

 

Minimum Pension

 

 

 

Gains (Losses) on
Available for Sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Translation

 

 

 

Liability

 

 

 

Securities

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

 

$

5,326

 

 

 

$

(736

)

 

 

$

31

 

 

 

$

4,621

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

 

149

 

 

 

(145

)

 

 

51

 

 

 

55

 

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

 

(3,142

)

 

 

 

 

 

(65

)

 

 

(3,207

)

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(2,993

)

 

 

(145

)

 

 

(14

)

 

 

(3,152

)

Balance at December 31, 2014

 

 

2,333

 

 

 

(881

)

 

 

17

 

 

 

1,469

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(87

)

 

 

15

 

 

 

(49

)

 

 

(121

)

Balance at December 31, 2015

 

 

2,246

 

 

 

(866

)

 

 

(32

)

 

 

1,348

 

Other comprehensive income (loss), before reclassifications

 

 

(19

)

 

 

 

 

 

(6

)

 

 

(25

)

Amounts reclassified from AOCI

 

 

(430

)

 

 

866

 

 

 

18

 

 

 

454

 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 

 

(449

)

 

 

866

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

429

 

Balance at December 31, 2016

 

 

$

1,797

 

 

 

$

 

 

 

$

(20

)

 

 

$

1,777

 

 

Unallocated assets are comprised principallyThe Company did not allocate additional tax expense (benefit) to other comprehensive income (loss) for all years presented as the Company is in a full valuation allowance position such that a deferred tax asset related to amounts recognized in other comprehensive income is not regarded as realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.

During 2016, the Company finalized the process to terminate a defined benefit plan. As a result, the Company reclassified the minimum pension liability of cash$0.9 million, net of a tax benefit of $0.4 million, from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Additionally the Company completed its plan to liquidate its ALD subsidiary in Korea. As a result of this liquidation, a cumulative translation gain of $0.4 million was reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” to “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During 2015, there were minimal realized gains reclassified from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Preferred Stock

The Board of Directors has authority under the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to issue shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01, with voting and cash equivalents and short-term investments aseconomic rights to be determined by the Board of Directors. As of December 31, 20132016 no preferred shares have been issued.

Treasury Stock

On October 28, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $100 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock through October 28, 2017. Repurchases are expected to be made from time to time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions in accordance with applicable federal securities laws. During 2016, the Company purchased 0.7 million shares for $13.0 million. At December 31, 2016, $22.3 million of the $100 million had been utilized.

The Company records treasury stock purchases under the cost method using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Upon reissuance of treasury stock, amounts in excess of the acquisition cost are credited to additional paid-in capital. If the Company reissues treasury stock at an amount below its acquisition cost and 2012.if additional paid-in capital associated with

 

F-39F-29



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013

 

 

LED & Solar

 

Data Storage

 

Unallocated

 

Total

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

91,348

 

$

 

$

 

$

91,348

 

Total assets

 

$

359,464

 

$

37,910

 

$

550,595

 

$

947,969

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill

 

$

55,828

 

$

 

$

 

$

55,828

 

Total assets

 

$

276,352

 

$

38,664

 

$

622,288

 

$

937,304

 

Other Segment Data (in thousands):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Depreciation and amortization expense:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

$

14,365

 

$

12,020

 

$

8,320

 

Data Storage

 

2,907

 

3,008

 

3,245

 

Unallocated

 

1,153

 

1,164

 

1,327

 

Total depreciation and amortization expense

 

$

18,425

 

$

16,192

 

$

12,892

 

Expenditures for long-lived assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LED & Solar

 

$

6,796

 

$

20,279

 

$

56,141

 

Data Storage

 

1,271

 

3,341

 

2,703

 

Unallocated

 

1,108

 

1,374

 

1,520

 

Total expenditures for long-lived assets

 

$

9,175

 

$

24,994

 

$

60,364

 

12.  Derivative Financial Instruments(Continued)

 

We use derivative financial instrumentsprior treasury stock transactions is insufficient to minimizecover the impactdifference between the acquisition cost and the reissue price, this difference is charged to accumulated deficit.

Note 15 — Stock Plans

Share-based incentive awards are provided to employees under the terms of foreign exchange rate changes on earningsthe Company’s equity incentive compensation plans (the “Plans”), which are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The 2010 Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders. The Company’s employees, non-employee directors, and cash flows. consultants are eligible to receive awards under the 2010 Stock Incentive Plan (as amended to date, the “2010 Plan”), which can include non-qualified stock options, incentive stock options, restricted share awards (“RSAs”), restricted share units (“RSUs”), performance share awards (“PSAs”), performance share units (“PSUs”), share appreciation rights, dividend equivalent rights, or any combination thereof. The Company settles awards under the Plans with newly issued shares or with shares held in treasury.

In 2013, the normal courseBoard of business, our operationsDirectors granted equity awards to certain employees under the Company’s 2013 Inducement Stock Incentive Plan (the “Inducement Plan”). The Company issued 124,500 stock option shares and 87,000 RSUs under this plan. Stock options under this plan vest over a three year period and have a 10-year term, and RSUs under this plan vest over a two or four year period. At December 31, 2013, the Inducement Plan was merged into the 2010 Plan and is considered an inactive plan with no further shares available for grant. At December 31, 2016, there are exposed77,500 option shares and 5,200 RSUs outstanding under the Inducement Plan.

The Company is authorized to fluctuationsissue up to 10.6 million shares under the 2010 Plan, including additional shares authorized under plan amendments approved by shareholders in foreign exchange rates. In order2016 and 2013. Option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to reduce the effectclosing price of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known foreign currency exposures, we enter into monthly forward contracts. We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Our forward contracts are not expected to subject us to material risks due to exchange rate movements because gains and losses on these contracts are intended to offset exchange gains and lossesthe Company’s common stock on the underlying assetstrading day prior to the date of grant; option awards generally vest over a three year period and liabilities. The forward contractshave a seven or ten year term. RSAs and RSUs generally vest over one to five years. Certain option and share awards provide for accelerated vesting if there is a change in control, as defined in the 2010 Plan. At December 31, 2016, there are marked-to-market through earnings. We conduct our derivative transactions with highly rated financial institutions in an effort to mitigate any material counterparty risk.1.5 million option shares and 0.6 million RSUs and PSUs outstanding under the 2010 Plan.

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

Maturity

 

Notional

 

(in thousands)

 

Component of

 

Value

 

Dates

 

Amount

 

Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

1

 

January 2014

 

4,700

 

Foreign currency collar

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

906

 

October 2014

 

34,069

 

Total Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

$

907

 

 

 

$

38,769

 

During 2016 the Company’s Board of Directors approved the 2016 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP Plan”). The Company is authorized to issue up to 750,000 shares under the 2016 ESPP Plan. Under the ESPP Plan, substantially all employees in the U.S. may purchase the Company’s common stock through payroll deductions at a price equal to 85 percent of the lower of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the beginning or end of each six-month Offer Period, as defined in the ESPP Plan, and subject to certain limits. The ESPP Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders.

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

Fair

 

Maturity

 

Notional

 

(in thousands)

 

Component of

 

Value

 

Dates

 

Amount

 

Not Designated as Hedges under ASC 815

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Prepaid and other current assets

 

248

 

January 2013

 

9,590

 

Total Derivative Instruments

 

 

 

$

248

 

 

 

$

9,590

 

Shares Reserved for Future Issuance

At December 31, 2016, the Company has 6.3 million shares reserved to cover exercises of outstanding stock options, vesting of RSUs, and additional grants under the 2010 Plan. At December 31, 2016, the Company has 0.7 million shares reserved to cover future issuances under the ESPP Plan.

Share-Based Compensation

The Company recognized share-based compensation in the following line items in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

 

F-40F-30



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

 

 

 

 

Amount of realized net gain (loss)

 

 

 

 

 

and changes in the fair value of

 

 

 

Location of realized net gain

 

derivatives for the year ended

 

 

 

(loss) and changes in the fair

 

December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

value of derivatives

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

Foreign currency exchange forwards

 

Other, net

 

$

248

 

$

333

 

$

553

 

Foreign currency collar

 

Other, net

 

$

906

 

$

 

$

 

These contracts were valued using market quotes in the secondary market for similar instruments (fair value Level 2, please see our footnote Fair Value Measurements).

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of sales

 

 

 

$

1,956

 

 

 

$

2,495

 

 

 

$

2,456

 

Research and development

 

 

 

3,324

 

 

 

4,031

 

 

 

4,498

 

Selling, general, and administrative

 

 

 

10,433

 

 

 

11,474

 

 

 

11,859

 

Total

 

 

 

$

15,713

 

 

 

$

18,000

 

 

 

$

18,813

 

 

The weighted average notional amount of derivative contracts outstanding duringCompany did not realize any tax benefits associated with share-based compensation for the yearyears ended December 31, 20132016, 2015, and 2012 was approximately $5.2 million2014, due to the full valuation allowance on its U.S. deferred tax assets. See Note 17, “Income Taxes” for additional information. The Company capitalized an insignificant amount of share-based compensation into inventory for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and $3.5 million, respectively2014.

 

Unrecognized share-based compensation costs at December 31, 2016 are summarized below:

 

 

 

 

Unrecognized

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Share-Based

 

 

 

Average Period

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

 

Expected to be

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

 

 

Recognized

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

(in years)

 

Stock option awards

 

 

 

$

660

 

 

 

0.6

 

Restricted stock units

 

 

 

3,034

 

 

 

2.0

 

Restricted stock awards

 

 

 

20,669

 

 

 

2.7

 

Performance share units

 

 

 

4,556

 

 

 

2.5

 

Total unrecognized share-based compensation cost

 

 

 

$

28,919

 

 

 

2.5

 

13.  Retirement PlansStock Option Awards

 

We maintain a defined contribution benefit plan under Section 401(k)Stock options are awards issued to employees that entitle the holder to purchase shares of the Internal Revenue Code. Almost all of our domestic full-time employeesCompany’s stock at a fixed price. At December 31, 2016, options outstanding that have vested and are eligibleexpected to participate in this plan. Under the plan during 2011, we provided matching contributions of fifty cents for every dollar employees contribute up to a maximum of $3,000. During 2012, we provided matching contributions of fifty cents for every dollar employees contribute, up to the lesser of 3% of the employee’s eligible compensation or $7,500. During 2013, we provided a matching contributions of fifty cents for every dollar employees contribute, up to the lesser of 3% of the employee’s eligible compensation or $7,650. Generally, the plan calls for vesting of Company contributions over the initial five years of a participant’s employment. We maintain a similar type of contribution plan at one of our foreign subsidiaries. Our contributions to these plans in 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $2.3 million, $2.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively.vest are as follows:

 

We acquired a defined benefit plan on May 5, 2000 that had been frozen as of September 30, 1991. No further benefits since September 30, 1991 accrued to any participant. The benefit that participants are entitled to receive as of their normal retirement date is their accrued benefit as of September 30, 1991. In connection with the freezing of the Plan as of September 30, 1991, all participants became fully vested in their benefit. The Plan is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). This plan has a plan year end of September 30.  There are 110 participants in the plan as of September 30, 2013. The plan is funded in accordance with ERISA guidelines and has $1.6  million in contract assets as of September 30, 2013.

14.  Selected Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

Number

 

Weighted

 

Average

 

Aggregate

 

 

of

 

Average

 

Remaining

 

Intrinsic

 

 

Shares

 

Exercise Price

 

Contractual Life

 

Value

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

(in years)

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Vested

 

1,449

 

 

$

35.39

 

 

4.9

 

 

$

39

 

Expected to vest

 

127

 

 

32.79

 

 

5.1

 

 

 

Total

 

1,576

 

 

$

35.18

 

 

4.9

 

 

$

39

 

 

The following table presents selected unaudited financial data for eachaggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the option exercise price and $29.15, the closing price of the Company’s common stock on December 30, 2016, the last trading day of the Company’s fiscal quarter of 2013 and 2012. Although unaudited, thisyear as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market.

Additional information has been prepared on a basis consistent with our audited Consolidated Financial Statements and, in the opinion of our management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that we consider necessary for a fair presentation of this information in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Such quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations.respect to stock option activity:

 

F-41F-31



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)

December 31, 2013(Continued)

 

 

 

Fiscal 2013 (unaudited)

 

Fiscal 2012 (unaudited)

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Q1

 

Q2

 

Q3

 

Q4

 

Q1

 

Q2

 

Q3

 

Q4

 

Net sales

 

$

61,781

 

$

97,435

 

$

99,324

 

$

73,209

 

$

139,909

 

$

136,547

 

$

132,715

 

$

106,849

 

Gross profit

 

22,552

 

34,640

 

30,308

 

15,642

 

65,268

 

61,254

 

49,884

 

38,727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes

 

(10,071

)

(4,081

)

(6,026

)

(22,085

)

16,462

 

11,011

 

7,698

 

(8,642

)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes

 

 

 

 

 

(50

)

807

 

4,055

 

(413

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

(10,071

)

$

(4,081

)

$

(6,026

)

$

(22,085

)

$

16,412

 

$

11,818

 

$

11,753

 

$

(9,055

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per common share:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.11

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.57

)

$

0.43

 

$

0.29

 

$

0.20

 

$

(0.22

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

0.10

 

(0.01

)

Income (loss)

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.11

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.57

)

$

0.43

 

$

0.31

 

$

0.30

 

$

(0.23

)

Diluted :

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Continuing operations

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.11

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.57

)

$

0.42

 

$

0.28

 

$

0.20

 

$

(0.22

)

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

0.02

 

0.10

 

(0.01

)

Income (loss)

 

$

(0.26

)

$

(0.11

)

$

(0.16

)

$

(0.57

)

$

0.42

 

$

0.30

 

$

0.30

 

$

(0.23

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Basic

 

38,716

 

38,764

 

38,841

 

38,904

 

38,261

 

38,370

 

38,577

 

38,698

 

Diluted

 

38,716

 

38,764

 

38,841

 

38,904

 

38,863

 

38,988

 

39,169

 

38,698

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

Number of

 

Average

 

 

 

Shares

 

Exercise Price

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

 

 

2,598

 

 

$

29.98

 

Granted

 

 

509

 

 

33.05

 

Exercised

 

 

(561

)

 

23.88

 

Expired or forfeited

 

 

(155

)

 

36.22

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

 

 

2,391

 

 

31.65

 

Granted

 

 

17

 

 

30.22

 

Exercised

 

 

(192

)

 

12.95

 

Expired or forfeited

 

 

(152

)

 

38.15

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2015

 

 

2,064

 

 

32.91

 

Granted

 

 

 

 

 

Exercised

 

 

(194

)

 

12.18

 

Expired or forfeited

 

 

(294

)

 

34.44

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

 

1,576

 

 

$

35.18

 

 

A varietyThe following table summarizes stock option information at December 31, 2016:

 

 

Options Outstanding

 

Options Exercisable

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

Aggregate

 

Average

 

Weighted

 

Range of

 

 

 

 

Remaining

 

Average

 

 

 

 

Intrinsic

 

Remaining

 

Average

 

Exercise Prices

 

Shares

 

Contractual Life

 

Exercise Price

 

Shares

 

Value

 

Contractual Life

 

Exercise Price

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in years)

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

 

(in years)

 

 

 

 

$20.00 – $30.00

 

 

32

 

 

5.8

 

 

$

28.18

 

 

29

 

 

$

39

 

 

5.9

 

 

$

28.04

 

$30.01 – $40.00

 

 

1,336

 

 

5.1

 

 

33.09

 

 

1,212

 

 

 

 

5.1

 

 

33.12

 

$40.01 – $50.00

 

 

73

 

 

2.7

 

 

45.93

 

 

73

 

 

 

 

2.7

 

 

45.96

 

$50.01 – $60.00

 

 

135

 

 

4.4

 

 

51.70

 

 

135

 

 

 

 

4.4

 

 

51.70

 

 

 

 

1,576

 

 

4.9

 

 

$

35.18

 

 

1,449

 

 

$

39

 

 

4.9

 

 

$

35.39

 

The fair value of factors influenceeach option is estimated on the leveldate of our net sales in a particular quarter including economic conditions ingrant using the LED, solar, data storage and semiconductor industries, the timing of significant orders, shipment delays, specific feature requests by customers, the introduction of new products by us and our competitors, production and quality problems, changes in material costs, disruption in sources of supply, seasonal patterns of capital spending by customers, interpretation and application of accounting principles, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, we derive a substantial portion of our revenues from the sale of products with a selling price of up to $8.0 million. As a result, the timing of recognition of revenue from a single transaction could have a significant impact on our net sales and operating results in any given quarter.Black-Scholes option pricing model.

 

Synos Acquisition

On October 1, 2013 (“Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the Acquisition Date”), Veeco acquired 100%value ultimately realized by employees who receive equity awards. No options were granted in 2016. The weighted average estimated values of employee stock option grants as well as the outstanding common sharesweighted average assumptions that were used in calculating such values during fiscal years 2015 and voting interest2014 were based on estimates at the date of Synos. The results of Synos’ operations have been included in the consolidated financial statements since that date. Synos is an early stage manufacturer of fast array scanning atomic layer deposition (“FAST-ALD”) tools for OLED and other applications. As a result of the acquisition, the Company has entered the FAST-ALD market which is complimentary to the Company’s MOCVD LED offerings.

Metrology Divestiture

On August 15, 2010, we signed a definitive agreement to sell our Metrology business to Bruker comprising our entire Metrology reporting segment for $229.4 million. Accordingly, Metrology’s operating results are accounted forgrant as discontinued operations in determining the consolidated results of operations. The sale transaction closed on October 7, 2010, except for assets located in China due to local restrictions. Total proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment of $1 million, totaled $230.4 million of which $7.2 million relates to the assets in China. As part of our agreement with Bruker,follows:

 

F-42F-32



Table of Contents

 

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)(Continued)

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2015

 

2014

 

Weighted average fair value

 

  $

10.58

 

  $

11.58

 

Dividend yield

 

0%

 

0%

 

Expected volatility factor(1)

 

44%

 

44%

 

Risk-free interest rate(2)

 

1.18%

 

1.19%

 

Expected life (in years)(3)

 

3.9

 

3.9

 

(1)

Expected volatility is measured using historical daily price changes of the Company’s stock over the respective expected term of the options and the implied volatility derived from the market prices of the Company’s traded options.

(2)

The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual term of the stock options is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

(3)

The expected life is the number of years the Company estimates that options will be outstanding prior to exercise. The Company’s computation of expected life was determined using a lattice-based model incorporating historical post vest exercise and employee termination behavior.

The following table summarizes information on options exercised for the periods indicated:

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash received from options exercised

 

  $

494

 

  $

2,233

 

  $

12,056

 

Intrinsic value of options exercised

 

  $

1,165

 

  $

2,089

 

  $

8,390

 

RSAs, RSUs, PSAs, PSUs

RSAs are stock awards issued to employees that are subject to specified restrictions and a risk of forfeiture. RSUs are stock awards issued to employees that entitle the holder to receive shares of common stock as the awards vest. PSAs and PSUs are awards that result in a payment to a grantee in shares of common stock if certain performance goals and vesting criteria are achieved. These awards typically vest over one to five years and vesting is subject to the grantee’s continued service with the Company and, in the case of performance awards, meeting the performance condition. The fair value of the awards is determined and fixed based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the trading day prior to the date of grant.

The following table summarizes the activity of these awards:

F-33



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 

 

 

 

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Number of

 

Grant Date

 

 

 

Shares

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

Outstanding - December 31, 2013

 

 

1,158

 

 

$

34.93

 

Granted

 

 

395

 

 

34.18

 

Released

 

 

(183

)

 

38.65

 

Forfeited

 

 

(133

)

 

33.66

 

Outstanding - December 31, 2014

 

 

1,237

 

 

34.27

 

Granted

 

 

672

 

 

30.33

 

Released

 

 

(389

)

 

35.65

 

Forfeited

 

 

(122

)

 

34.46

 

Outstanding - December 31, 2015

 

 

1,398

 

 

 

31.97

 

Granted

 

 

1,166

 

 

17.59

 

Released

 

 

(349

)

 

32.73

 

Forfeited

 

 

(266

)

 

27.31

 

Outstanding - December 31, 2016

 

 

1,949

 

 

$

23.85

 

For performance awards, the final number of shares earned will vary depending on the achievement of the actual results relative to the performance targets. Each performance award is included in the table above at the grant date target share amount until the end of the performance period (if not previously forfeited). The total fair value of shares that vested during the years ended December 31, 20132016, 2015, and 2014 was $7.5 million, $9.6 million, and $6.2 million, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company received cash proceeds of $1.2 million and issued 83,000 shares under the ESPP Plan for the year ended December 31, 2016. The weighted average estimated values of employee purchase rights as well as the weighted average assumptions that were used in calculating such values during fiscal year 2016 were based on estimates at the date of grant as follows:

Year ended December 31,

2016

Weighted average fair value

  $

4.45

Dividend yield

0%

Expected volatility factor(1)

43%

Risk-free interest rate(2)

0.35%

Expected life (in years)(3)

0.5

(1)

Expected volatility is measured using historical daily price changes of the Company’s stock over the respective expected term of the options and the implied volatility derived from the market prices of the Company’s traded options.

(2)

The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual term of the purchase rights is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

(3)

The expected life is the length of time, in years, that the purchase rights will be outstanding.

F-34



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 

$22.9Note 16 — Retirement Plans

The Company maintains a defined contribution plan for the benefit of its U.S. employees. The plan is intended to be tax qualified and contains a qualified cash or deferred arrangement as described under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Eligible participants may elect to contribute a percentage of their base compensation, and the Company may make matching contributions, generally equal to fifty cents for every dollar employees contribute, up to the lesser of three percent of the employee’s eligible compensation or three percent of the maximum the employee is permitted to contribute under then current Internal Revenue Code limitations. Generally, the plan calls for vesting in the Company contributions over the initial five years of a participant’s employment. The Company recognized costs associated with these plans of approximately $2.6 million, $2.5 million, and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

During 2016, the Company finalized the process to terminate a defined benefit plan it had acquired in the year 2000. The plan had been frozen as of September 30, 1991, and no further benefits had been accrued by participants since that date. In connection with the termination, responsibility for the payment of benefits under the plan was transferred to an insurance company. As a result, the Company reclassified the minimum pension liability of $0.9 million, net of a tax benefit of $0.4 million, from “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets to “Other, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Note 17 — Income Taxes

The amounts of income (loss) before income taxes attributable to domestic and foreign operations were as follows:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Domestic

 

 

$

(123,021

)

 

$

(53,553

)

 

$

(95,195

)

Foreign

 

 

3,577

 

 

30,907

 

 

16,841

 

Total

 

 

$

(119,444

)

 

$

(22,646

)

 

$

(78,354

)

Significant components of the expense (benefit) for income taxes consisted of the following:

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Current:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

$

 

 

$

139

 

 

$

(2,464

)

Foreign

 

 

1,937

 

 

6,952

 

 

2,325

 

State and local

 

 

(111

)

 

(407

)

 

55

 

Total current expense (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

1,826

 

 

6,684

 

 

(84

)

Deferred:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Federal

 

 

1,459

 

 

2,104

 

 

(11,230

)

Foreign

 

 

(646

)

 

516

 

 

(291

)

State and local

 

 

127

 

 

28

 

 

191

 

Total deferred expense (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

940

 

 

2,648

 

 

(11,330

)

Total expense (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

$

2,766

 

 

$

9,332

 

 

$

(11,414

)

The income tax expense was reconciled to the tax expense computed at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate as follows:

F-35



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 

 

 

Year ended December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit) at U.S. statutory rates

 

 

$

(41,806

)

 

$

(7,926

)

 

$

(27,424

)

State taxes, net of U.S. federal impact

 

 

(1,963

)

 

(1,607

)

 

(662

)

Effect of international operations

 

 

8,849

 

 

(7,659

)

 

(6,160

)

Research and development tax credit

 

 

(801

)

 

(1,628

)

 

(1,935

)

Net change in valuation allowance

 

 

50,520

 

 

23,655

 

 

27,156

 

Change in accrual for unrecognized tax benefits

 

 

(1,700

)

 

4,876

 

 

(1,940

)

ALD liquidation

 

 

(12,435

)

 

 

 

 

U.S. share-based compensation

 

 

2,133

 

 

 

 

 

Goodwill impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,786

 

Change in contingent consideration

 

 

 

 

 

 

(10,279

)

Worthless stock deduction

 

 

 

 

(2,069

)

 

 

Change in entity tax status

 

 

 

 

904

 

 

 

Other

 

 

(31

)

 

786

 

 

44

 

Total expense (benefit) for income taxes

 

 

$

2,766

 

 

$

9,332

 

 

$

(11,414

)

Deferred income taxes reflect the effect of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts recognized for tax purposes. The tax effects of the temporary differences were as follows:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

2015

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Deferred tax assets: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inventory valuation

 

 

$

6,681

 

 

$

6,334

 

Net operating losses and credit carry forwards

 

 

54,527

 

 

33,181

 

Credit carry forwards

 

 

24,598

 

 

20,738

 

Warranty and installation accruals

 

 

1,757

 

 

3,022

 

Share-based compensation

 

 

12,624

 

 

12,461

 

Other

 

 

6,778

 

 

5,787

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

106,965

 

 

81,523

 

Valuation allowance

 

 

(106,793

)

 

(56,273

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

 

172

 

 

25,250

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities: 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Purchased intangible assets

 

 

11,071

 

 

32,550

 

Undistributed earnings

 

 

186

 

 

618

 

Depreciation

 

 

69

 

 

1,908

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

11,326

 

 

35,076

 

Net deferred taxes

 

 

$

(11,154

)

 

$

(9,826

)

The Company did not record a provision for U.S. federal income taxes or any additional withholding taxes on unremitted earnings in foreign subsidiaries in the amount of $48.2 million at December 31, 2016, as such amount is permanently reinvested. It is not practicable to determine the hypothetical amount of tax associated with such unremitted earnings if the Company were to assume they were remitted to the U.S. For financial reporting purposes, these balances are determined

F-36



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

as amounts that exceed the tax basis of such investments. The Company has provided U.S. federal income taxes and additional withholding taxes on foreign earnings that are anticipated to be remitted.

At December 31, 2016 the Company had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $137.2 million that will expire between 2034 and 2036, if not utilized. Additionally, $3.5 million of proceeds was heldcapital losses will expire in escrow2021. At December 31, 2016 the Company had U.S. foreign tax credit carryforwards of $7.7 million that will expire between 2023 and was restricted from use for one year following2026 and U.S. federal research and development credits of $12.1 million that will expire between 2031 and 2036. The Company also has state and local net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $68.0 million (a net deferred tax asset of $3.5 million net of federal tax benefits and before the closing datevaluation allowance) that will expire between 2016 and 2036. In addition, the Company has state credits of the transaction$9.9 million some of which are indefinite and others that will expire between 2016 and 2030.

The Company makes assessments to secure certain specified losses arising out of breaches of representations, warranties and covenants we madeestimate if sufficient taxable income will be generated in the stock purchase agreement and related documents.future to use existing deferred tax assets. The restrictionCompany’s cumulative three year loss in its domestic operations led to a full valuation allowance against the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets in fiscal year 2014, because the Company could not conclude that such amounts are realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis. As the cumulative three year loss continued in 2016, the Company increased the valuation allowance by approximately $50.5 million during the period ended December 31, 2016.

The Company amortizes certain indefinite-lived intangible assets for tax purposes, which are not amortizable for financial reporting purposes. The deferred tax liability at December 31, 2016 includes $13.2 million relating to the escrowed proceeds was released on October 6, 2011. As parttax effect of differences between financial reporting and tax bases of intangible assets that are not expected to reverse within the Company’s net operating loss carryforward period.

A roll-forward of the sale we incurred transaction costs, which consistedCompany’s uncertain tax positions for all U.S. federal, state, and foreign tax jurisdictions was as follows:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Balance at beginning of year

 

 

$

9,152

 

 

 

$

4,276

 

 

 

$

6,228

 

Additions for tax positions related to current year

 

 

1,038

 

 

 

5,596

 

 

 

244

 

Additions for tax positions related to prior years

 

 

233

 

 

 

143

 

 

 

199

 

Reductions for tax positions related to prior years

 

 

(2,826

)

 

 

 

 

 

(2,345

)

Reductions due to the lapse of the statute of limitations

 

 

(39

)

 

 

(642

)

 

 

(38

)

Settlements

 

 

(106

)

 

 

(221

)

 

 

(12

)

Balance at end of year

 

 

$

7,452

 

 

 

$

9,152

 

 

 

$

4,276

 

If the amount of investment banking feesunrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2016 were recognized, the Company’s income tax provision would decrease by $5.4 million. The gross amount of interest and legal fees, totaling $5.2 million. Duringpenalties accrued in income tax payable in the fourth quarter of 2010, we recognized a pre-tax gain on disposal of $156.3Consolidated Balance Sheets was approximately $0.3 million and a pre-tax deferred gain$0.2 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The Company or one of $5.4 million relatedits subsidiaries files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and various state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. All material federal income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2013 subject to subsequent utilization of net operating losses generated in such years. All material state and local income tax matters have been reviewed through 2012. The majority of the Company’s foreign jurisdictions have been reviewed through 2013. Substantially all of the Company’s foreign jurisdictions’ statutes of limitation remain open with respect to the assets in China.  We recognized into incometax years from 2013 through 2016. The Company does not anticipate that its uncertain tax position will change significantly within the pre-tax deferred gain of $5.4 million during the third quarter of 2012 relatednext twelve months subject to the completion of the saleongoing tax audits and any resultant settlement.

F-37



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

Note 18 — Segment Reporting and Geographic Information

The Company operates and measures its results in one operating segment and therefore has one reportable segment: the design, development, manufacture, and support of thin film process equipment primarily sold to make electronic devices. The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker, the Chief Executive Officer, evaluates performance of the assetsCompany and makes decisions regarding allocation of resources based on total Company results.

Sales by market is as follows:

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Sales by end-market

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lighting, Display & Power Electronics

 

 

$

136,247

 

 

 

$

291,133

 

 

 

$

278,551

 

Advanced Packaging, MEMS & RF

 

 

68,304

 

 

 

61,935

 

 

 

11,449

 

Scientific & Industrial

 

 

74,913

 

 

 

64,297

 

 

 

44,429

 

Data Storage

 

 

52,987

 

 

 

59,673

 

 

 

58,444

 

Total

 

 

$

332,451

 

 

 

$

477,038

 

 

 

$

392,873

 

The Company’s significant operations outside the United States include sales and service offices in China, Europe and Rest of World. For geographic reporting, sales are attributed to Bruker.the location in which the customer facility is located.

Sales and long-lived tangible assets by geographic region are as follows:

 

 

Net Sales to Unaffiliated Customers

 

Long-lived Tangible Assets

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

2016

 

 

 

2015

 

 

 

2014

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

United States

 

 

$

85,637

 

 

 

$

86,627

 

 

 

$

44,060

 

 

 

$

60,012

 

 

 

$

64,951

 

 

 

$

63,349

 

China

 

 

85,834

 

 

 

242,442

 

 

 

159,063

 

 

 

219

 

 

 

422

 

 

 

621

 

EMEA(1)

 

 

83,410

 

 

 

64,019

 

 

 

35,644

 

 

 

93

 

 

 

96

 

 

 

78

 

Rest of World

 

 

77,570

 

 

 

83,950

 

 

 

154,106

 

 

 

322

 

 

 

14,121

 

 

 

14,704

 

Total

 

 

$

332,451

 

 

 

$

477,038

 

 

 

$

392,873

 

 

 

$

60,646

 

 

 

$

79,590

 

 

 

$

78,752

 

(1) EMEA consists of Europe, the Middle East, and Africa

Note 19 — Selected Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

The following table presents selected unaudited financial data for each fiscal quarter of 2016 and 2015. Although unaudited, this information has been prepared on a basis consistent with the Company’s audited Consolidated Financial Statements and, in the opinion of management, reflects all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that are considered necessary for a fair presentation of this information in accordance with GAAP. Such quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of future results of operations.

F-38



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

 

 

Fiscal 2016

 

Fiscal 2015

 

 

Q1

 

Q2

 

Q3

 

Q4

 

Q1

 

Q2

 

Q3

 

Q4

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Net sales

 

 $

78,011

 

 $

75,348

 

 $

85,482

 

 $

93,609

 

 $

98,341

 

 $

131,410

 

 $

140,744

 

 $

106,543

 

Gross profit

 

31,956

 

31,439

 

33,455

 

36,008

 

35,136

 

49,069

 

54,250

 

38,786

 

Net income (loss)

 

(15,533)

 

(32,082)

 

(69,598)

 

(4,998)

 

(19,110)

 

(8,386)

 

5,306

 

(9,788)

 

Basic income (loss) per common share

 

(0.40)

 

(0.82)

 

(1.78)

 

(0.13)

 

(0.48)

 

(0.21)

 

0.13

 

(0.25)

 

Diluted income (loss) per common share

 

(0.40)

 

(0.82)

 

(1.78)

 

(0.13)

 

(0.48)

 

(0.21)

 

0.13

 

(0.25)

 

 

Other Quarterly ItemsImpairment Charge

 

During the fourth quarter of 2013, we recorded asset impairment charges in LED & Solar of $0.9 million related to certain tools previously used in our laboratories carried in property, plant and equipment which we are holding for sale and $0.3 million related to another asset carried in other assets. During the fourth quarter of 2012, we recorded an asset impairment charge of $1.3 million related to a particular asset in our Data Storage segment.

During 2012, we took measures to improve profitability, including a reduction in discretionary expenses, realignment of our senior management team and consolidation of certain sales, business and administrative functions. As a result of these actions, we recorded a $3.8 million restructuring charge consisting of $3.0 million in personnel severance and related costs, $0.4 million in equity compensation and related costs and $0.4 million in other severance costs resulting from a headcount reduction of 52 employees. We recorded $2.0 million of these charges in the third quarter of 20122016, the Company decided to significantly reduce future investments in its ALD technology development and, $1.8as a result, recorded a charge for impairment of its ALD assets, including $54.3 million for the full impairment of thesethe intangible purchased ALD technology. The impairment charges were based on projected cash flows that required the use of unobservable inputs. Refer to Note 6, “Goodwill and Intangible Assets,” for additional information.

Note 20 — Subsequent Events

New Convertible Notes

In January 2017, the Company issued $345.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.70% convertible senior unsecured notes due 2023 (the “Convertible Notes”) pursuant to an indenture, dated as of January 18, 2017, between the Company and U.S. Bank National Association, as the trustee (the “Offering”). The Company received net proceeds from the Offering, after deducting fees and expenses payable by the Company, of approximately $336.0 million.

The Convertible Notes bear interest payable semiannually in arrears on January 15 and July 15 of each year, beginning on July 15, 2017. The Company will separately account for the liability and equity components of the Convertible Notes. The fair value of the liability component used in the fourth quarterallocation between the liability and equity components as of 2012 with the balance recorded in the first quarter of 2012.

As a result of the delay in filing our Form 10-Q for September 30, 2012 (“Q3 10-Q”), we were required to evaluate the impact of events and circumstances occurring through the date of issuance was based on the filingpresent value of cash flows using a discount rate of 7%, the Company’s borrowing rate for a similar debt instrument without the conversion feature.

The Convertible Notes mature on January 15, 2023, unless earlier repurchased, redeemed or converted. The Convertible Notes are convertible into common shares of the Q3 10-Q. After considering declinesCompany under certain circumstances described in systems shipments and parts usage occurring though the dateindenture. The initial conversion rate is 24.9800 shares of the filingCompany’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Q3 10-Q, we determined thatConvertible Notes, with an increaseinitial conversion price of approximately $40.03 per share of common stock. The conversion rate is subject to adjustment in our reserve for slow movingcertain circumstances. The dilutive effect of the Convertible Notes on income (loss) per share will be calculated using the treasury stock method since the Company has both the current intent and obsolete inventory was warranted and resultedability to settle the principal amount of the Convertible Notes in us recording a total charge of $7.2 million to cost of sales in the third quarter of 2012. The evaluation resulted in relatively lower provisions for inventory reserves over the first three quarters of 2013. We recorded a $1.8 million charge to cost of sales for inventory write downs in the fourth quarter of 2012 that related to a terminated program. The effect on the comparative statements above was to reduce gross profit for September 30, 2012 compared to all other periods presented.cash.

 

Out of Period AdjustmentAgreement to Acquire Ultratech

 

We identified net cumulative errors which overstated cumulative net income from continuing operations through December 31, 2011 by $0.6 millionOn February 2, 2017, Veeco and net cumulative errors that understated net income from continuing operationsUltratech, Inc. (“Ultratech”), a leading supplier of lithography, laser-processing, and inspection systems used to manufacture semiconductor devices and LEDs, signed a definitive agreement for Veeco to acquire Ultratech. The Boards of Directors of both Veeco and Ultratech have unanimously approved the transaction.

Ultratech shareholders will receive (i) $21.75 per share in cash and (ii) 0.2675 of a share of Veeco common stock for each Ultratech common share outstanding. Based on Veeco’s closing stock price on February 1, 2017, the six month period ended June 30, 2012 by $1.1 million. As a result, in the third quarter of 2012, we recorded adjustments to correct all prior periods resulting in an increase in income from continuing operations of $0.5 million.transaction

 

F-43F-39



Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

consideration is valued at approximately $28.64 per Ultratech share. The implied total transaction value is approximately $815 million and the implied enterprise value is approximately $550 million, net of Ultratech’s net cash balance as of December 31, 2016. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2017, subject to approval by Ultratech shareholders, regulatory approvals in the United States, and other customary closing conditions.

F-40



Table of Contents

 

Schedule II—II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (in thousands)

COL. A

 

COL. B

 

COL. C

 

COL. D

 

COL. E

 

 

 

 

Additions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

Charged to

 

Charged to

 

 

 

Balance at

 

 

 

 

Charged

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning

 

Costs and

 

Other

 

 

 

End of

 

 

Balance at

 

(Credited)

 

Charged to

 

 

 

Balance at

 

Description

 

of Period

 

Expenses

 

Accounts

 

Deductions

 

Period

 

 

Beginning

 

to Costs and

 

Other

 

 

 

End of

 

Deducted from asset accounts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of Period

 

Expenses

 

Accounts

 

Deductions

 

Period

 

Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

492

 

$

1,946

 

$

 

$

 

$

2,438

 

 

$

206

 

$

171

 

$

 

$

(91

)

$

286

 

Valuation allowance in net deferred tax assets

 

4,708

 

2,420

 

625

 

 

7,753

 

 

56,273

 

50,520

 

 

 

106,793

 

 

$

5,200

 

$

4,366

 

$

625

 

$

 

$

10,191

 

 

$

56,479

 

$

50,691

 

$

 

$

(91

)

$

107,079

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

468

 

$

198

 

$

 

$

(174

)

$

492

 

 

$

731

 

$

43

 

$

 

$

(568

)

$

206

 

Valuation allowance in net deferred tax assets

 

1,765

 

2,943

 

 

 

4,708

 

 

34,909

 

23,655

 

(2,291

)

 

56,273

 

 

$

2,233

 

$

3,141

 

$

 

$

(174

)

$

5,200

 

 

$

35,640

 

$

23,698

 

$

(2,291

)

$

(568

)

$

56,479

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2011

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 

$

512

 

$

 

$

 

$

(44

)

$

468

 

 

$

2,438

 

$

(1,814

)

$

325

 

$

(218

)

$

731

 

Valuation allowance in net deferred tax assets

 

1,644

 

 

 

121

 

1,765

 

 

7,753

 

27,156

 

 

 

34,909

 

 

$

2,156

 

$

 

$

 

$

77

 

$

2,233

 

 

$

10,191

 

$

25,342

 

$

325

 

$

(218

)

$

35,640

 

 

S-1S-1