Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

(Mark One)

 

x

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142017

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from          to         

 

Commission file number 1-13627

 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

DELAWARE

26-4413382

(State of Incorporation or Organization)

26-4413382
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

350 Indiana Street, Suite 800

Golden, Colorado

80401

(Address of principal executive offices)

80401
(Zip Code)

 

(303) 839-5060

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.01 par value

 

NYSE MKTAmerican

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o  No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o  No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer o☐      

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated        Non accelerated filer  o

Smaller reporting company x         Emerging growth company ☐

Do                                                                                       (Do not check if a (smallersmaller

                                                                                       reporting company)

 

 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act. 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o  No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes x  No o

 

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 20142017 was approximately $37.2 million,$26,478,366, based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock of $1.15$0.56 per share on the NYSE MKTAmerican on June 30, 2014.2017. For the purpose of this calculation, the registrant has assumed that its affiliates as of June 30, 20142017 included all directors and officers and one shareholder that held approximately 22.3%46% of its outstanding common stock. The number of shares of common stock outstanding on February 25, 201527, 2018 was 53,162,833.91,929,709.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K.

 


 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

FORM 10-K

YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

INDEX

 


PAGE

PART I

ITEM 1 AND ITEM 2

BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES……………………………………………………...………..

9

ITEM 1A

RISK FACTORS…………………………………………………………..………………..…..

33

ITEM 1B

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS………………………………………………………...

46

ITEM 3

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS……………………………………………………………………….

46

ITEM 4

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES………………………………………………………………

46

PART II

ITEM 5

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES………………………..

47

ITEM 6

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA…………………………………………

48

ITEM 7

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS………………………………………………………………….

50

ITEM 8

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA…………………………….

59

ITEM 9

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE……………………………………………………………..

60

ITEM 9A

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES…………………………………………………………….

60

ITEM 9B

OTHER INFORMATION………………………………………………………………………

60

PART III

ITEM 10

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE……………

61

ITEM 11

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION………………………………………………………………

61

ITEM 12

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS………………………………………………

61

ITEM 13

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE……………………………………………………………………………….

61

ITEM 14

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES………………………………...………

61

PART IV

ITEM 15

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES………………………………………

62

ITEM 16

PREPARATION OF STATEMENT OR REPORT……………………………………………..

63

EXHIBITS

63

SIGNATURES

67

 

2


Table of Contents

References to “Golden Minerals, the “Company,” “our,” “we,” or “us” mean Golden Minerals Company, its predecessors and consolidated subsidiaries, or any one or more of them, as the context requires. Many of the terms used in our industry are technical in nature. We have included a glossary of some of these terms below.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Some information contained in or incorporated by reference into this annual report on Form 10-K may contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information (collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other applicable securities laws. These statements include statements relating to our plans, expectations and assumptions concerning the Velardeña Properties (as defined below), the El Quevar project and certain properties in our exploration portfolio, the timing and budget for costs related to our Velardeña Properties, our El Quevar project and our exploration properties, our expected cash needs, and statements concerning our financial condition, business strategies and business and legal risks.

We use the words “anticipate,” “continue,” “likely,” “estimate,” “expect,” “may,” “could,” “will,” “project,” “should,” “believe” and similar expressions (including negative and grammatical variations) to identify forward-looking statements.  Statements that contain these words discussThese statements include comments relating to our futureplans, expectations and assumptions concerning the oxide plant lease, including the expected term, anticipated revenues, and potential future tailings expansion; the El Quevar project, including timing and expectations of evaluation activities; the Santa Maria property, including the PEA results (including life of mine and production expectations), and other expectations regarding the project, including future drilling plans, timing of initial drill results, expansion potential for the existing deposit and general cost expectations; the Rodeo property, including the Company’s general evaluation plans and cost expectations; the Celaya property, including farm-out terms and possible future drill testing; the Mogotes property, including future drilling plans and evaluation activities; our financial outlook in 2018, including anticipated income and expenditures during the year; expected need for miningexternal financial and processing at the Velardeña Propertiesstatements concerning our financial condition, business strategies and planned exploration activities,business and contain projections of 2015 expenditures or other matters, or state other forward-looking information.legal risks. Although we believe the expectations and assumptions reflected in those forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that these expectations and assumptions will prove to be correct. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors described in this annual report on Form 10-K, including:

·HigherLower revenue than anticipated costsfrom the oxide plant lease, which could result from delays or interruptions related to optimizing mining and processingproblems at the Velardeña Propertiesthird party's mine or at the oxide plant, permitting problems at the third party's mine or the oxide plant, delays in Mexico;constructing additional tailings capacity at the oxide plant, earlier than expected termination of the lease or other causes; 

·

Higher than anticipated care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties in Mexico or at El Quevar in Argentina; 

Continued decreases or insufficient increases in silver and gold prices;

 

·Whether we are able to raise the necessary capital required to continue our business on terms acceptable to us or at all, and the likely negative effect of continued low silver and gold prices or unfavorable exploration results;  

Unfavorable results from exploration at the Santa Maria, Rodeo, Yoquivo, Mogotes or other exploration properties and whether we will be able to advance these or other exploration properties; 

���Risks related to the El Quevar project in Argentina, including unfavorable results from our Velardeñevaluation activities, the feasibility and economic viability and unexpected costs of maintaining the project, and whether we will be able to find a Properties, including variationsjoint venture partner or secure adequate financing to further advance the project; 

Variations in the nature, quality and quantity of any mineral deposits that are or may be located there, our ability to extract and sell minerals from the mines successfully or profitably at current silver and gold prices, mining or processing problems, decreases in expected silver and gold prices, our ability to obtain and maintain any necessary permits, consents, or authorizations for mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties accidentsor the Company's exploration properties, changes in interpretations of geological information, and unfavorable results of metallurgical and other tests; 

3


Table of Contents

·

Whether we will be able to mine and sell minerals successfully or profitably at any of our current properties at current or future silver and gold prices and achieve our objective of becoming a mid-tier mining company; 

Potential delays in our exploration activities or other activities to advance properties towards mining resulting from environmental consents or permitting delays or problems, accidents, problems with contractors, disputes under agreements related to exploration properties, unanticipated eventscosts and our ability to raise the necessary capital required to finance future mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties;other unexpected events; 

 

·Risks related to the El Quevar project in Argentina, including whether we will be able to find a joint venture partner to advance the project, feasibility and economic viability and increased costs associated with maintaining the project;

·        The results of future exploration at our exploration properties and our ability to further advance certain exploration properties;

·Our ability to retain key management and mining personnel necessary to optimize mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties and to successfully runoperate and grow our business;

 

·Economic and political events affecting the market prices for gold, silver, gold, zinc, lead and other minerals whichthat may be found on our exploration properties;

 

·Political and economic instability in Mexico, and Argentina, and other countries in which we may conduct our business and future actions of any of these governments with respect to nationalization of natural resources or other changes in mining or taxation policies; and

 

·

Volatility in the market price of our common stock; and

·The factors set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this annual report on Form 10-K.

2



 

Many of these factors are beyond our ability to control or predict. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such expectations may prove to be materially incorrect due to known and unknown riskrisks and uncertainties. You should not unduly rely on any of our forward-looking statements. These statements speak only as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K. Except as required by law, we are not obligated to publicly release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to reflect future events or developments. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us and persons acting on our behalf are qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained in this section and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL

“Mineralized material” as used in this annual report on Form 10-K, although permissible under the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards. We cannot be certain that any deposits at the Velardeña Properties, or any part of the Yaxtché deposit at the El Quevar, projectSanta Maria or Rodeo properties or any deposits at our other exploration properties, will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves”. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of the disclosed mineralized material estimates will ever be confirmed or converted into reserves or that mineralized material can be economically or legally extracted. In addition, in this annual report on Form 10-K we also modify our estimates made in compliance with National Instrument 43-101 to conform to SEC Industry Guide 7 for reporting in the United States. Mineralized material is substantially equivalent to measured and indicated mineral resources (exclusive of reserves) as disclosed for reporting purposes in Canada, except that the SEC only permits issuers to report “mineralized material” in tonnage and average grade without reference to contained ounces.

 

4


Table of Contents

CONVERSION TABLE

 

In this annual report on Form 10-K, figures are presented in both United States standard and metric measurements. Conversion rates from United States standard measurement systems to metric and metric to United States standard measurement systems are provided in the table below. All currency references in this annual report on Form 10-K are to United States dollars, unless otherwise indicated.

 

U.S. Unit

Metric Measure

Metric Unit

U.S. Unit

Metric Measure

Metric Unit

U.S. Measure

1 acre

 

0.4047 hectares

 

1 hectare

 

2.47 acres

1 foot

 

0.3048 meters

 

1 meter

 

3.28 feet

1 mile

 

1.609 kilometers

 

1 kilometer

 

0.62 miles

1 ounce (troy)

 

31.103 grams

 

1 gram

 

0.032 ounces (troy)

1 ton

 

0.907 tonnes

 

1 tonne

 

1.102 tons

 

GLOSSARY OF SELECTED MINING TERMS

 

Assay” means to test ores or minerals by chemical or other methods for the purpose of determining the amount of valuable metals contained.

Base Metal” means a classification of metals usually considered to be of low value and higher chemical activity when compared with the precious metals (gold, silver, platinum, etc.). This nonspecific term generally refers to the high-volume, low-value metals copper, lead, tin, and zinc.

 

Breccia” means rock consisting of fragments, more or less angular, in a matrix of finer-grained material or of cementing material.

 

Calcareous Clastic” means sedimentary rock composed of siliciclastic particles usually of conglomerate, sand, or silt-size and cemented by calcium carbonate in the form of calcite.

 

Claim” means a mining interest giving its holder the right to prospect, explore for and exploit minerals within a defined area.

 

Concentrates” means the clean product of ore or metal separated from its containing rock or earth by froth flotation or other methods of mineral separation.

 

Concession” means a grant or lease of a tract of land made by a government or other controlling authority in return for stipulated services or a promise that the land will be used for a specific purpose.

 

Core Drill” means a rotary type of rock drill that cuts a core of rock and is recovered in long cylindrical sections, two centimeters or more in diameter.

 

Deposit” means an informal term for an accumulation of minerals.

 

3



Development Stage” means a project with an established resource, not in production, engaged in the process of additional studies preparing for completion of a feasibility study or for commercial extraction.

 

Diorite” means a grey to dark grey intermediate intrusive igneous rock composed principally of plagioclase feldspar (typically andesine), biotite, hornblende, and/or pyroxene.

 

Doré” means gold and silver bullion that remains in a cupelling furnace after the lead has been oxidized and skimmed off.

Epithermal Calcite-Quartz” means deposits, typically occurring in veins, of calcite-quartz from hydrothermal fluids at shallow depths under conditions in the lower ranges of temperature and pressure.

 

Euhedral” means a well-developed degree of which mineral grains show external crystal faces (fully crystal-faced).

5


Table of Contents

 

Exploration Stage” means a project that is not yet in either the Development Stage or Production Stage.

 

Feasibility Study” means an engineering study designed to define the technical, economic, and legal viability of a mining project with a high degree of reliability.

 

Felsic” means igneous rocks that are relatively rich in elements that form feldspar and quartz.

Flotation” means the separating of finely crushed minerals from one another by causing some to float in a froth and others to remain in suspension in the pulp. Oils and various chemicals are used to activate, make floatable, or depress the minerals.

 

Formation” means a distinct layer of sedimentary rock of similar composition.

 

Fracture System” means a set or group of contemporaneous fractures related by stress.

 

Grade” means the metal content of ore, usually expressed in troy ounces per ton (2,000 pounds) or in grams per ton or metric tonnes which contain 2,204.6 pounds or 1,000 kilograms.

 

Hypabyssal rock” means an intrusive igneous rock that originates at medium to shallow depths within the crust, and has intermediate grain size and often porphyritic texture between that of volcanic and plutonic rocks.

Inferred Mineral Resource” means the part of a mineral resource for which quantity and grade or quality can be estimated on the basis of geological evidence and limited sampling and reasonably assumed, but not verified, geological and grade continuity. The estimate is based on limited information and sampling gathered through appropriate techniques from locations such as outcrops, trenches, pits, workings and drill holes.

Laramide Orogeny” means a period of mountain building in western North America, which started in the Late Cretaceous age, 70 to 80 million years ago, and ended 35 to 55 million years ago.

 

Mineralization” means the concentration of metals within a body of rock.

 

Mineralized Material” means a mineralized body that has been defined by appropriate drilling and/or underground sampling to establish continuity and support an estimate of tonnage and an average grade of the selected metals.

 

Mining” means the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves or mineral deposits to produce a marketable metal or mineral product. Exploration continues during the mining process and, in many cases, mineral reserves or mineral deposits are expanded during the life of the mine activities as the exploration potential of the deposit is realized.

 

Monzodiorite” means coarse-grained igneous rock consisting of essential plagioclase feldspar, orthoclase feldspar, hornblende and biotite, with or without pyroxene, with plagioclase being the dominant feldspar making up 6% to 90% of the total feldspar and varying from oligoclase to andesine in composition. The presence of the orthoclase feldspar distinguishes this rock from a diorite.

 

National Instrument 43-101” or “NI 43-101” means the standards of disclosure for mineral projects prescribed by the Canadian Securities Administrators.

 

4



Net Smelter Return Royalty” means a defined percentage of the gross revenue from a resource extraction operation, less a proportionate share of transportation, insurance, and processing costs.

 

Open Pit” means a mine working or excavation open to the surface.

 

Ore” means material containing minerals that can be economically extracted.

 

Outcrop” means that part of a geologic formation or structure that appears at the surface of the earth.

 

Oxide” means mineralized rock in which some of the original minerals have been oxidized (i.e., combined with oxygen).

 

6


Table of Contents

Precious Metal” means any of several relatively scarce and valuable metals, such as gold, silver, and the platinum-group metals.

 

Preliminary Economic Assessment” or “PEA” means a study, other than a pre-Feasibility or Feasibility Study, that includes an economic analysis of the potential viability of mineral resources.

 

Probable Mineral Reserves” means mineral reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for Proven Mineral Reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for Proven Mineral Reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.

 

Production Stage” means a project that is actively engaged in the process of extraction and beneficiation of mineral reserves or mineral deposits to produce a marketable metal or mineral product.

 

Proven Mineral Reserves” means mineral reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well established.

 

Reclamation” means the process of returning land to another use after mining is completed.

 

Recovery” means that portion of the metal contained in the ore that is successfully extracted by processing, expressed as a percentage.

 

MineralReserves” means that part of a mineral deposit that could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of mineral reserve determination.

 

Sampling” means selecting a fractional part of a mineral deposit for analysis.

 

Sediment” means solid fragmental material that originates from weathering of rocks and is transported or deposited by air, water, or ice, or that accumulates by other natural agents, such as chemical precipitation from solution or secretion by organisms, and that forms in layers on the earth’s surface at ordinary temperatures in a loose, unconsolidated form.

 

Sedimentary” means formed by the deposition of Sediment.

 

Silver Equivalent” means silver and gold only, with gold converted to silver equivalents at a 70 to 1 ratio.

 

Skarn” means a coarse-grained metamorphic rock formed by the contact metamorphism of carbonate rock often containing garnet, pyroxene epodite and wollastonnite.

 

Stock” means discordant igneous intrusion having a surface exposure of less than 40 square miles.

 

Sulfide” means a compound of sulfur and some other element.

 

Tailings Pond” means a low-lying depression used to confine tailings, the prime function of which is to allow enough time for heavy metals to settle out or for cyanide to be destroyed before water is discharged into the local watershed.

 

Tertiary” means the first period of the Cenozoic Era (after the Cretaceous of the Mesozoic Era and before the Quaternary) thought to have covered the span of time between 2 to 3 million years ago and 65 million years ago.

 

5


7



Table of Contents

Vein” means a fissure, fault or crack in a rock filled by minerals that have traveled upwards from some deep source.

 

Waste” means rock lacking sufficient grade and/or other characteristics of Ore.ore.

 

8


Table of Contents

PART I

 

ITEMS 1 AND 2:  BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

 

Overview

 

We are a mining company and we ownholding a 100% interest in the Velardeña and Chicago precious metals mining properties (the “Velardeña Properties”)and associated oxide and sulfide processing plants in the State of Durango, Mexico (the “Velardeña Properties”), the El Quevar advanced exploration silver property in the province of Salta, Argentina, and a diversified portfolio of precious metals and other mineral exploration properties located primarily in or near historical precious metals producing regions of Mexico. The Velardeña Properties and the El Quevar advanced exploration property are our only material properties.

        We remain focused on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near term prospects of mining, and particularly for properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña processing plants. We are also reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico.We are also focused on evaluation activities at our El Quevar exploration property in Argentina, and are continuing our exploration efforts on selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 10 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico. Our management team is comprised of experienced mining professionals with extensive expertise in mineral exploration, mine construction and development, and mine operations. Our principal offices areoffice is located in Golden, Colorado at 350 Indiana Street, Suite 800, Golden, CO 80401, and our registered office is the Corporation Trust Company, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, DE 19801. We also maintain an office at the Velardeña Properties in Mexico and exploration offices in Argentina and Mexico.

 

We recommenced mining activities at the Velardeña Properties in July 2014 and began processing material from the Velardeña mine in November 2014. Our decision to restart mining activities followed an extensive evaluation period, which began after the shutdown of the Velardeña Properties in June 2013 and included a 9,000-meter drill program that concluded in June 2014.

We are primarily focused on efforts to optimize mining and processing activities at our Velardeña Properties in order to achieve positive net cash flows at the Velardeña Properties. We are focused on establishing a second group of mining assets, which may include those recently acquired assets in the Parral District in Chihuahua Mexico, and obtaining oxide feed from outside sources to enable us to restart the oxide plant, in order to generate sufficient revenue, along with revenue from our Velardeña Properties, to fund our continuing business activities.

We are continuing our exploration efforts on selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 30 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico, including our Celaya property in the State of Guanajuato Mexico. We continue to hold our El Quevar property on care and maintenance and to reduce holding costs until we can find a partner to further advance the project. We reduced general and administrative expenses in 2014 by approximately 17% over 2013 expenses. We expect this reduced level of spending to continue in 2015. We also are reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico.

No Proven or Probable Mineral Reserves/Exploration Stage Company

 

We are considered an exploration stage company under the SEC criteria since we have not demonstrated the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves at our Velardeña Properties or any of our other properties. In SEC Industry Guide 7, the SEC defines a “reserve” as that part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination. Proven or probable mineral reserves are those reserves for which (a) quantity is computed and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are spaced so closely that the geologic character is defined and size, shape and depth of mineral content can be established (proven) or the sites are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced but high enough to assume continuity between observation points (probable). Mineral Reservesreserves cannot be considered proven or probable unless and until they are supported by a feasibility study, indicating that the mineral reserves have had the requisite geologic, technical and economic work performed and are economically and legally extractable.

 

Prior to suspending mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties in June 2013,November 2015, we had revenues from the sale of silver, gold, lead and zinc products from the Velardeña and Chicago mines. We have not completed a feasibility study with regard to all or a portion of any of our properties to date. Any mineralized material discovered or extracted by us should not be considered proven or probable mineral reserves. As of December 31, 2014,2017, none of our mineralized material met the definition of proven or probable mineral reserves. We expect to remain an exploration stage company for the foreseeable future, even though we were extracting and processing mineralized material. We will not exit the exploration stage until such time, if ever, that we demonstrate the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves that meet the guidelines under SEC Industry Guide 7.

 

Company History

 

We were incorporated in Delaware under the Delaware General Corporation Law in March 2009, and we are the successor to Apex Silver Mines Limited (“Apex Silver”) for purposes of reporting under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).2009. From March 2009 through September 2011, we focused on the advancement of our El Quevar silver project in

6



Argentina. On September 2, 2011, we completed a business combination transaction with ECU Silver Mining Inc. (“ECU”) and now own

9


Table of Contents

the Velardeña and Chicago silver, gold and base metals mines located in the Velardeña mining district in the State of Durango, Mexico as further described below under “—Velardeña Properties”. Since the business combination with ECU, we have focused primarily on the further advancement and improvement of the Velardeña Properties.Properties, as well as identifying and establishing other mining opportunities with near term prospects.

 

Corporate Structure

 

Golden Minerals Company, headquartered in Golden, Colorado, is the operating entity through which we conduct our business. Following our September 2, 2011 business combination, ECU became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Golden Minerals, and threetwo of ECU’s wholly-owned Mexican subsidiaries hold the assets and rights associated with the Velardeña Properties. We have a number of other wholly-owned subsidiaries organized throughout the world, including in Mexico, Central America, South America, the Caribbean and Europe. We generally hold our exploration rights and properties through subsidiaries organized in the countries in which our rights and properties are located.

 

Our Competitive Strengths and Business Strategy

 

Our business strategy is to establish Golden Minerals as a mid-tier precious metals mining company focusing on miningfocused in Mexico and Argentina. We also review strategic opportunities from time to time.

Velardeña Properties.Due to continuing net operating losses, we suspended mining and sulfide processing activities at the Velardeña Properties establishingduring the first half of November 2015 in order to conserve the future value of the asset. We have placed the mine and sulfide processing plant on care and maintenance to enable a secondre-start of either the mine or the mill when mining and processing plans and metals prices support a cash positive outlook for the property. We retained a core group of mining assets,employees, most of whom have been assigned to operate the oxide plant, which may includeis leased to a third party and not affected by the shutdown.

In July 2015 we entered into a leasing agreement with Minera Hecla, S.A. de C.V. (“Hecla”), a Mexican corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company, to lease our recently acquired exploration properties, obtainingVelardeña oxide feedplant for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. The lease agreement contained several lease extension options, and in the third quarter 2016, the lease was extended through June 2017. The 2016 extension included an agreement under which Hecla would construct, at its cost, certain tailings expansion facilities to accommodate Hecla's increased use of tailings capacity in excess of an agreed amount, while preserving flexibility for future tailings expansions. The tailings expansion work began in early 2017 and is now completed. The parties agreed that Hecla would either leave unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost. In connection with their agreement regarding tailings impoundment expansions, the parties agreed that Hecla had the right to extend the lease for an additional 18 months following June 30, 2017, or until December 31, 2018. On March 24, 2017, Hecla exercised its right to extend the lease until December 31, 2018.

On August 2, 2017, we granted Hecla an option to extend the lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 (the “Extension Period”) in exchange for a $1.0 million cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares, of our common stock issued at a price of $0.55 per share (the “Hecla Share Issuance”), which was the undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price at the time of the option agreement. Hecla must exercise the option to extend the lease no later than October 3, 2018. All of the fixed fees and throughput related charges remain the same as under the original lease. Similar volume limitations apply to any required future tailings expansions, which Hecla will fund, leaving unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility. Hecla will have the right to terminate the lease during the Extension Period for any reason with 120 days’ notice. Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following a termination notice through December 31, 2020 if we decide to use the oxide plant for our own purposes before December 31, 2020.

10


Table of Contents

Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant. During the year ended December 31, 2017, Hecla processed approximately 131,000 tonnes of material through the oxide plant, resulting in total revenues to us of approximately $6.7 million, comprised of approximately $3.0 million for direct plant charges plus fixed fees and continuedother net reimbursable costs totaling approximately $3.7 million. We incurred costs of approximately $2.1 million related to the services we provide under the lease for a net margin of $4.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. We expect Hecla to continue to process material near the intended approximately 400 tonnes per day rate during 2018, which would generate cash payments to us, net of reimbursable costs, of approximately $4.6 million during 2018. However, because Hecla has the right to terminate the lease on 60 days’ notice, there is no assurance that these amounts will be received.

El Quevar Project. We plan to continue to advance El Quevar as much as possible within the limits of our current exploration budget and remain open to finding a partner to contribute to the funding of further exploration and development.

Exploration Focus. We are focused on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with high precious metal grades and low development costs with near term prospects of mining, and particularly properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña processing plants. We are also continuing our exploration efforts on selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 10 exploration portfolio.  We also are focusedproperties located primarily in Mexico. During the last two years, we have continued to focus on strategic opportunities, primarily on development or operating properties in North America,the Santa Maria mine west of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua, including Mexico.

Velardeñ4,000 meters of core drilling, acquired the right to purchase claims covering the Yoquivo District, Ocampo Municipality, Chihuahua through an option agreement and completed a Properties.  On July 1, 2014 we restarted mining2,080 meter core drilling program at the Velardeña Properties and began processing material from the mine on November 3, 2014. During 2014 we generated payable metals totaling approximately 42,000 silver equivalent ounces (equivalents calculated at 70:1 silver to gold) and included approximately 29,000 ounces of silver and 194 ounces of gold. We are focused on optimizing mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties in order to ramp up to the 285 tonnes per day (“tpd”) rate, which we expect to achieve late in the first quarter 2015. We expect feed material grades to gradually increase through the second quarter of 2015 as new stopes in the mine are developed and access to the Terneras vein increases. In the first quarter 2015, the engineering firm Tetra Tech updated our estimate of mineralized material at the Velardeña Properties, and also plans to complete a Preliminary Economic Assessment and a technical report pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101 in respect of the Velardeña Properties.Rodeo property.

 

El Quevar Project.  We continue to hold our El Quevar property on care and maintenance and to reduce holding costs until we can find a partner to fund further exploration.

Exploration Focus.  We are focused on establishing a second group of mining assets, which may include our Los Azules property and our Santa Maria property, each of which contains a small underground mine located in the Parral District in Chihuahua, Mexico. We completed drill programs at each of the Los Azules and Santa Maria properties during 2014 and expect to release reports on these results in the first quarter 2015. During 20152018 we plan to focus our exploration efforts primarily at our El Quevar silver project and on these properties in the Parral District,exploration and exploration on certainevaluation activities at Santa Maria, Yoquivo and other properties, including our Celaya project in the State of Guanajuato Mexico.properties. We expect our expenditures for the exploration program in 20152018 to be approximately $3.1$3.0 million.

 

Experienced Management Team.  We are led by a team of mining professionals with approximately 13060 years of combined experience in exploration, project development, construction and operations all overmanagement, primarily in the world.Americas. Our executive officers have held senior positions at various large mining companies including, among others, Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, Phelps Dodge Corporation,INCO Limited, Meridian Gold Company, Barrick Gold Exploration and Noranda Exploration. Our executive team has a proven ability to manage large projects in challenging environments.

 

Velardeña Properties

 

Location, Access and Facilities

 

The Velardeña Properties are comprised of two underground mines and two processing plants within the Velardeña mining district, which is located in the municipality of Cuencamé, in the northeast quadrant of the State of Durango, Mexico, approximately 65 kilometers southwest of the city of Torreón, Coahuila and approximately 140 kilometers northeast of the city of Durango, which is the capital of the State of Durango. The mines are reached by a seven kilometer road from the village of Velardeña which is reached by highway from Torreón and Durango. The Velardeña mining district is situated in a hot, semi-arid region.

 

Of the two underground mines comprising the Velardeña Properties, the Velardeña mine includes five different major vein systems including the Terneras, Roca Negra, San Mateo, Santa Juana and San Juanes systems. During 20142015 we were miningmined from the

7



San Mateo, Terneras and Roca Negra vein systems as well as the Santa Juana vein system to augment grades as mining and processing rates ramped up. During 2015 we plan to mine primarily from the Terneras, Roca Negra and San Mateo veins with some feed coming from the Santa Juana vein. The Chicago mine is located approximately two kilometers south of the Velardeña property. We did not mine from the Chicago mine during 2014, and do not have current plans to mine from the Chicago mine during 2015.

 

We own a 300 tonne per day flotation sulfide mill situated near the town of Velardeña, which accounted for approximately 100% and 42% of our revenue from saleable metals during 2014 and 2013, respectively.2015. The mill includes lead, zinc and pyrite flotation circuits in which we can

11


process the sulfide orematerial to make lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. In 2014 mostMost of the silver and gold sold in 2015 was contained in the lead concentrate. In 2013 most of the silver was contained in the lead concentrate and most of the gold was contained in the pyrite concentrate. During 20142015 we processed all our mined material through the sulfide plant.

 

We also own a conventional 550 tonne per day cyanide leach oxide mill with a Merrill-Crowe precipitation circuit and flotation circuit located adjacent to our Chicago mine, which accounted for approximately 58% of our revenue from saleable metals during 2013. We currently are not processing material through the oxide plant. Wewe previously used the mill to process oxide and mixed sulfide/oxide material from the Velardeña Properties and during the first half of 2013, generated silver and gold bearing precipitates and lead concentrates that were sold to third party refineries. We continue to search for oxide feed from outside sources, which could enable us to restart the oxide plant. There is also a small refinery at the oxide plant capable of matching the throughput of the oxide plant up to about 300 tpd, or slightly more than half the maximum capacity ofProperties. In July 2015, we leased the oxide plant to make doré silverHecla to process its own material through the plant for up to 42 months. Hecla began processing material at the plant in December 2015. In August 2017, we granted Hecla an option to extend the lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020. The option to extend the lease must be exercised no later than October 3, 2018. We continue to evaluate and gold bars. We did not make any doré in 2013 or 2014.search for other oxide and sulfide feed sources, focusing on sources within haulage distance of our sulfide and oxide mills at the Velardeña Properties.

 

Ore isPrior to shutdown, we trucked material from the Velardeña minemines to the sulfide plant, which has its own tailings ponds.plant. In January 2012 we completed a tailings pond expansion at the sulfide plant, which is fully permitted and has capacity to treat tailings for approximately four additional years at the average processing rate of 285 tpd.   Fortonnes per day.   At the oxide plant, we completed the first stage of a new tailings pond during May 2013. If oxide mining activities resume, the first stage provides capacity to treatThe tailings for approximately one year at the processing rate of 500 tpd.  We would expect to complete the second stage approximately six months after the resumption of oxide mining activities, which would provide tailings treatment capacity for approximately an additional two years at 500 tpd. Completion of the third stage would provide tailings treatment capacity for approximately an additional 14 years at the 500 tpd processing rate.expansion work began in early 2017 and is now completed.

 

Power for all of the mines and plants is provided through substations connected to the national grid. Water is provided for all of the mines by wells located in the valley adjacent to the Velardeña Properties. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are currently only using water from two wells near the sulfide plant and one well near the oxide plant. Under our current mining plan, we may need additional water to run the sulfide plant, which we can truckpumping from the two unusedthree wells nearassociated with the oxide plant or obtain from outside sources, both of which will increase our water costs. To avoid these higher water costs, we plan to construct a pipeline to transport water from the two unused wells near the oxide plant. We are waiting on certain environmental permitting and expect to have this pipeline complete by the end of 2015.is more than sufficient for Hecla’s processing operations.

 

8


12



The following map shows the location of the Velardeña Properties.Properties (other than the El Mogote Fraccion concession, which is located southeast of the identified properties).

 

 

Property History

 

Exploration and mining in the Velardeña district extends back to at least the late 1500s or early 1600s, with large scale mining beginning in 1888 with the Velardeña Mining and Smelter Company. In 1902, the mining properties were acquired by ASARCO, who mined the property until 1926 when the mines were closed. For the next 35 years, the mines were operated from time to time by small companies and local miners. The property was nationalized in 1961, and in 1968 the sulfide processing plant was built by the Mexican government. In 1994, William Resources acquired the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties. In 1997, ECU Gold (the predecessor to ECU Silver Mining Inc.) purchased from William Resources the subsidiaries that owned the concessions. ECU builtconcessions and the oxide processing plant. The sulfide processing plant was acquired in 1998.2004.

 

Title and Ownership Rights

 

We hold the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties through our wholly-owned Mexican subsidiariessubsidiary Minera William S.A. de C.V. and BLM Minera Mexicana S.A. de C.V. At present, a total of 2930 mineral concessions comprise the Velardeña Properties. The Velardeña Properties encompass approximately 557895 hectares. The mineral concessions vary in size, and the concessions comprising each mineral property are contiguous within each of the Velardeña and Chicago properties. We are required to

13


pay annual concession holding fees to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to the Velardeña mining concessions. In 2014,2017, we made such payments totaling approximately $12,000$69,000 and expect to pay approximately $12,000$70,000 in 2015.2018.  We also own the surface rights to 144 hectares that contains the oxide plant, tailings area and access to the Chicago mine, along with surface lands that may be required for potential plant expansions.

 

The Velardeña Properties are subject to the Mexican ejido system requiring us to contract with the local communities, or ejidos, surrounding our properties to obtain surface access rights needed in connection with our mining and exploration activities. We currently have contracts with two ejidos to secure surface rights for our Velardeña Properties with a total annual cost of approximately $35,000. The first contract is$25,000. We have a ten-year contract with the Velardeña ejido, which provides surface rights to certain roads and other infrastructure at the Velardeña Properties through 2021.  The second contract is2021, and a 25-year contract with the Vista Hermosa ejido, signed in March 2013, which provides exploration access and access rights for roads and utilities for our Velardeña Properties. In 2012 we entered into an agreement with the Vista Hermosa ejido to purchase the surface rights to the 144 hectares area that contains the oxide plant, tailings area and access to the Chicago mine, along with surface lands that may be required for potential plantProperties until 2038.

14


 


expansions. The title for the purchase has been issued by the National Agrarian Registry (RAN) and is in the process of being transferred to us.

The following Velardeña Properties exploitation concessions are identified below by name and number in the Federal government Public Registry of Mining.

 

Mine/Area

Mine/Area

Name of Exploitation

Concession

Concession

Number

Velardeña

 

AMPL. DEL ÁGUILA MEXICANA

 

85580

 

 

ÁGUILA MEXICANA

 

168290

 

 

LA CUBANA

 

168291

 

 

TORNASOL

 

168292

 

 

SAN MATEO NUEVO

 

171981

 

 

SAN MATEO

 

171982

 

 

RECUERDO

 

171983

 

 

SAN LUIS

 

171984

 

 

LA NUEVA ESPERANZA

 

171985

 

 

LA PEQUEÑA

 

171988

 

 

BUEN RETIRO

 

172014

 

 

UNIFICACIÓN SAN JUAN EVANGELISTA

 

172737

 

 

UNIFICACIÓN VIBORILLAS

 

185900

 

 

BUENAVENTURA No. 3

 

188507

 

 

EL PÁJARO AZÚL

 

188508

 

 

BUENAVENTURA 2

 

191305

 

 

BUENAVENTURA

 

192126

 

 

LOS DOS AMIGOS

 

193481

 

 

VIBORILLAS NO. 2

 

211544

 

 

KELLY

 

218681

 

 

 

 

 

Chicago

 

SANTA TERESA

 

171326

 

 

SAN JUAN

 

171332

 

 

LOS MUERTOS

 

171986

 

 

EL GAMBUSINO

 

171987

 

 

AMPLIACIÓN SAN JUAN

 

183883

 

 

MUÑEQUITA

 

196313

 

 

SAN AGUSTÍN

 

210764

 

 

EL PISTACHÓN

 

220407

 

 

LA CRUZ

 

189474

EL MOGOTE FRACCION I

221401

 

We hold water concessions in wells that provide water for the Velardeña Properties. In Mexico water concessions are granted by the National Commission of Water (“CNA”). Currently no new water concessions are being granted by the CNA; however, companies can acquire water concessions through purchase or lease from current concession holders. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are required to make annual payments to the CNA to maintain our rights to these wells.  In 20142017 we made such payments totaling approximately $28,000$25,000 and expect to pay approximately the same amount in 2015.2018. We are required to pay a fine to the CNA each year if

15


we use too much water from a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well. During 20142017 we paid fines of approximately $20,800 for our overuse of one well and approximately $3,000 for our underuse of another well.did not incur any over usage or under usage fines.

 

Geology and Mineralization

 

The Velardeña district is located at the easternmost limit of the Sierra Madre Occidental on the boundary between the Sierra Madre Oriental and the Mesa Central sub-provinces. Both of these terrains are underlain by Paleozoic and possibly Precambrian basement rocks.

 

The regional geology is characterized by a thick sequence of limestone and minor calcareous clastic sediments of Cretaceous age, intruded by Tertiary plutons of acidic to intermediate composition. During the Laramide Orogeny, the sediments were folded into symmetrical anticlines and synclines that were modified into a series of asymmetrical overturned folds by a later stage of compression.

 

10



A series of younger Tertiary stocks have intruded the older Cretaceous limestone over a distance of approximately 15 kilometers along a northeast to southwest trend. The various mineral deposits of the Velardeña mining district occur along the northeast southwest axis and are spatially associated with the intrusions and their related alteration.

 

An important northwest southeastnorthwest-southeast fracture system is associated with these intrusions and, in many cases, acts as the main focus of mineralization. The Velardeña Properties are underlain by a thick sequence of limestone that corresponds to rocks of the Aurora and Cuesta del Cura formations of Lower Cretaceous age.

 

Several types of Tertiary intrusive rocks are present in the Velardeña district. The largest of these rocks outcrops on the western flank of the Sierra San Lorenzo and underlies a portion of the Velardeña Properties. It is referred to as the Terneras pluton and forms a northeast oriented, slightly elongated body, considered to represent a diorite or monzodiorite that outcrops over a distance of about 2.5 kilometers. The adjacent limestone has been altered by contact metamorphism (exoskarn), and locally the intrusive has been metamorphosed (endoskarn).

 

The following is a description of the individual geological characteristics and mineralization found on each of the properties comprising the Velardeña Properties.and Chicago mines.

 

Velardeña Mine

 

The Santa Juana, Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo vein deposits on the Velardeña property are hosted by Aurora Formation limestone, the Terneras intrusion and related skarn. The limestone is intruded by a series of multiphase diorite or monzodiorite stocks (Terneras intrusion) and dikes of Tertiary age that outcrop over a strike length of approximately 2.5 kilometers.

 

Two main vein systems are present on the Velardeña property. The first is a northwest striking system as found in the Santa Juana deposit, while the second is east-west trending and is present in the Santa Juana, Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo deposits.

 

In the Santa Juana deposit, two main sets of vein trends are observed. The most significant is a steeply northeast dipping, northwest trending set that has acted as the main conduit for the mineralizing fluids in the Santa Juana deposit. This direction includes both linear and curved northwest vein sets.

 

The Terneras, San Juanes and San Mateo veins all strike east-west and dip steeply north. The most extensive of these is the Terneras vein, which was mined in the past over a strike length of 1,100 meters. All of these veins are observed to have extensive strike lengths and vertical continuity for hundreds of meters. The mineralogy of the east west system is somewhat different in that it contains less arsenic than the northwest Santa Juana veins.

16


Mineralization in the deposits located at the Velardeña mine belongs primarily to epithermal calcite quartz veins with associated lead, zinc, silver, gold and copper mineralization, typical of the polymetallic vein deposits of northern Mexico. The veins are usually thin, normally in the 0.2 meter to 0.5 meter range, but consistent along strike and down dip. Coxcomb and rhythmically banded textures are common.

 

Chicago Mine

 

On the Chicago property, the oldest rocks outcropping are Cretaceous limestone of the Aurora Formation which are highly folded. This limestone is locally metamorphosed by the intrusion of the Tertiary dioritic stocks and dykes. The general geology of the Chicago property is very similar to the geology of the Velardeña property. The Chicago veins strike northeast and dip steeply southeast. Chicago ore tends to be higher in lead and zinc and lower in arsenic than the Santa Juana ore. Vein widths at Chicago are variable and tend to be narrower than at the Santa Juana deposit, especially in the skarn host.

 

2014 Technical Report

 

During the first quarter of 2015, the engineering firm of Tetra Tech, Inc. (“Tetra Tech”) completed an estimate of mineralized material at the Velardeña Properties, set forth in the following table:

 

11


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

Silver

    

Gold

    

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Ag)

 

(Au)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grade

 

Grade

 

Lead

 

 

 

 

 

Tonnes

 

(Grams

 

(Grams

 

(Pb)

 

 

 

 

 

(in

 

per

 

per

 

Grade

 

Zinc (Zn)

 

Mineralized Material

 

thousands)

 

tonne)

 

tonne)

 

%

 

Grade %

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

572

 

295

 

4.1

 

1.34

 

1.07

 

Sulfide

 

1,032

 

274

 

3.9

 

1.11

 

1.42

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

91

 

208

 

3.2

 

3.77

 

2.8

 

Sulfide

 

98

 

165

 

2.8

 

2.97

 

3.49

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

1,793

 

272

 

3.8

 

1.42

 

1.49

 


Mineralized Material

 

Tonnes
(in
thousands)

 

Silver
(Ag)
Grade
(Grams
per
tonne)

 

Gold
(Au)
Grade
(Grams
per
tonne)

 

Lead
(Pb)
Grade
%

 

Zinc (Zn)
Grade %

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

572

 

295

 

4.1

 

1.34

 

1.07

 

Sulfide

 

1,032

 

274

 

3.9

 

1.11

 

1.42

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

91

 

208

 

3.2

 

3.77

 

2.8

 

Sulfide

 

98

 

165

 

2.8

 

2.97

 

3.49

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

1,793

 

272

 

3.8

 

1.42

 

1.49

 


Note: Results may not tie precisely due to rounding. Additionally, silver ounces, zinc pounds and leads pounds are rounded to the nearest thousand and gold ounces are rounded to the nearest ounce and tonnes. The variance in rounding different commodities and units is for convenience and does not reflect any differences in the level of accuracy of the calculated mineralized material estimate.

 

The Tetra Tech mineralized material estimate assumed a silver price of $25 per troy ounce, a gold price of $1,446 per troy ounce, and a cutoff grade of a net smelter return (“NSR”) of $100 per tonne.

 

The following table shows the commodity prices and metallurgical recoveries used to determine the cutoff grade.

 

Metal

 

Metal Prices*

 

Sulfide
Metallurgical
Recovery
%

 

Oxide
Metallurgical
Recovery
%

 

Mixed Metallurgical
Recovery
%

 

Silver

 

$

25 (oz)

 

89

 

68

 

50

 

Gold

 

$

1,446 (oz)

 

68

 

71

 

29

 

Lead

 

$

0.96 (lb)

 

83

 

 

25

 

Zinc

 

$

0.91 (lb)

 

83

 

 

37

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Sulfide

    

Oxide

    

Mixed

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metallurgical

 

Metallurgical

 

Metallurgical

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recovery

 

Recovery

 

Recovery

 

Metal

 

Metal Prices*

 

%

 

%

 

%

 

Silver

 

$

25 (oz)  

 

89

 

68

 

50

 

Gold

 

$

1,446 (oz)  

 

68

 

71

 

29

 

Lead

 

$

0.96 (lb)  

 

83

 

 —

 

25

 

Zinc

 

$

0.91 (lb)  

 

83

 

 —

 

37

 


* Amounts represent three-year average prices.

17


The cutoff grade of $100 NSR per tonne of mineralized material was determined by adding the estimated average costs of mining ($53 per tonne), processing ($27 per tonne) and general and administration ($20 per tonne). The average cost estimates are the same for both the Velardeña and Chicago mines. The NSR value of mineralized material was determined for each type of mineralized material (sulfide, mixed, and oxide) by multiplying a fractional factor that represents an estimated combination of metallurgical recovery, treatment charges, penalties and payment terms by the unit value of each metal and then multiplying by the expected amount of that metal in each block of inventoried material.

 

The following table shows the recovery ratesreduction in mineralized material reported in the Tetra Tech report that resulted from extraction and processing of mineralized material in 2015. As a result of the shutdown of mining and processing in November 2015, there are no results for silver, gold, lead and zinc at each of our processing facilities for 2013 and 2014.2016 or 2017.

 

 

 

2013

 

2014(1)

 

Oxide plant recovery

 

 

 

 

 

Silver

 

78.0

%

%

Gold

 

40.1

%

%

Sulfide plant recovery

 

 

 

 

 

Silver

 

72.1

%

56.6

%

Gold

 

61.2

%

29.0

%

Lead

 

62.3

%

51.7

%

Zinc

 

82.2

%

45.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

Silver

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

 

 

 

(Ag)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Au)

 

 

 

Grade

 

Contained

 

Lead

 

Contained

 

 

 

Contained

 

 

 

 

 

Grade

 

Contained

 

(Grams

 

Silver (Ag)

 

(Pb)

 

Lead (Pb)

 

Zinc

 

Zinc (Zn)

 

 

 

Tonnes

 

(Grams

 

Gold (Au)

 

per

 

oz.

 

Grade

 

lbs.

 

(Zn)

 

lbs.

 

Mineralized Material

 

(in thousands)

 

per tonne)

 

oz.

 

tonne)

 

(in thousands)

 

%

 

(in thousands)

 

Grade %

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

572

 

4.1

 

74,780

 

295

 

5,425

 

1.34

 

16,898

 

1.07

 

13,493

 

Sulfide

 

1,032

 

3.9

 

127,741

 

274

 

9,101

 

1.11

 

25,254

 

1.42

 

32.307

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

91

 

3.2

 

9,362

 

208

 

609

 

3.77

 

7,563

 

2.8

 

5,617

 

Sulfide

 

98

 

2.8

 

8,822

 

165

 

520

 

2.97

 

6,417

 

3.49

 

7,540

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2014

 

1,793

 

3.8

 

220,406

 

272

 

15,655

 

1.42

 

56,132

 

1.49

 

58,958

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015 Extraction

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

Sulfide

 

76

 

2.6

 

6,371

 

156

 

383

 

0.8

 

1,343

 

1.09

 

1,839

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

Sulfide

 

 5

 

1.9

 

310

 

117

 

19

 

 2

 

220

 

2.82

 

311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Tonnes Extracted in 2015

 

81

 

2.6

 

6,681

 

154

 

401

 

0.87

 

1,564

 

1.2

 

2,150

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metal loss adjustments during 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

Sulfide

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,063)

 

 —

 

(290)

 

 —

 

(522)

 

 —

 

(547)

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

Sulfide

 

 —

 

 —

 

(140)

 

 —

 

(8)

 

 —

 

(107)

 

 —

 

(74)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Tonnes Extracted in 2015

 

 —

 

 —

 

(3,203)

 

 —

 

(297)

 

 —

 

(629)

 

 —

 

(621)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineralized Material at December 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

572

 

4.1

 

74,780

 

295

 

5,425

 

1.34

 

16,898

 

1.07

 

13,493

 

Sulfide

 

956

 

3.9

 

118,308

 

274

 

8,429

 

1.11

 

23,389

 

1.42

 

29,921

 

Chicago Mine

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide and mixed

 

91

 

3.2

 

9,362

 

208

 

609

 

3.77

 

7,563

 

2.8

 

5,617

 

Sulfide

 

93

 

2.8

 

8,372

 

165

 

493

 

2.97

 

6,089

 

3.49

 

7,155

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Mineralized Material at December 31, 2015

 

1,712

 

3.8

 

210,522

 

272

 

14,956

 

1.43

 

53,940

 

1.49

 

56,187

 


(1)  Recoveries were low in 2014Note: Results may not tie precisely due to rounding. Additionally, silver ounces, zinc pounds and leads pounds are rounded to the buildup of in-process inventoriesnearest thousand and gold ounces are rounded to the nearest ounce and tonnes. The variance in rounding different commodities and units is for convenience and does not reflect any differences in the sulfide plant associated withlevel of accuracy of the start-upcalculated mineralized material estimate.

18


For further detail regarding mineralized material, see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL”.

 

Velardeña Properties and PlansActivities

 

In June 20132017 we suspendedincurred approximately $1.6 million in expenses related to shut down costs and maintenance at our Velardeña Properties as a result of the suspension of mining and processing atactivities in November 2015.  We retained a core group of employees, most assigned to operate the oxide plant that is leased to a third party and not affected by the shutdown. The retained employees also include an exploration group and an operations and administrative group to continue to advance our plans in Mexico, oversee corporate compliance activities, and to maintain and safeguard the longer term value of the Velardeña Properties. assets.

In July 20142015, we recommenced mining activitiesleased our Velardeña oxide plant to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. The lease agreement contained several lease extension options, and in the third quarter 2016, the lease was extended through June 2017. The 2016 extension included an agreement under which Hecla would construct, at its cost, certain tailings expansion facilities to accommodate Hecla's increased use of tailings capacity in excess of an agreed amount, while preserving flexibility for future tailings expansions. The tailings expansion work began in early 2017 and is now completed. The parties agreed that Hecla would either leave unused at the Velardeña Properties and began processing material fromend of the mineslease term an agreed amount of capacity in November 2014. During the fourth quarterexpanded tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost. In connection with their agreement regarding tailings impoundment expansions, the parties agreed that Hecla had the right to extend the lease for an additional 18 months following June 30, 2017, or until December 31, 2018. On March 24, 2017, Hecla exercised its right to extend the lease until December 31, 2018.

 

12



2014, On August 2, 2017, we granted Hecla an option to extend the processing facilities generated payable metals totalinglease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 in exchange for a $1.0 million cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 42,000 silver equivalent ounces (equivalents calculated1.8 million shares, of our common stock issued at 70:1 silvera price of $0.55 per share, which was the undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price at the time of the option agreement. Hecla must exercise the option to gold)extend the lease no later than October 3, 2018. All of the fixed fees and included approximately 29,000 ouncesthroughput related charges remain the same as under the original lease. Similar volume limitations apply to any required future tailings expansions, which Hecla will fund, leaving unused at the end of silver and 194 ouncesthe lease term an agreed amount of gold. Payable silver equivalents include only silver and gold equivalent ounces. Also,capacity in the expanded tailings facility. Hecla will have the right to terminate the lease during the fourth quarter 2014,Extension Period for any reason with 120 days’ notice. Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the processing facilities generated approximately 111,000 pounds of payable lead and 135,000 pounds of payable zinc. Theplant following table shows actual silver, gold and silver equivalent payablesa termination notice through December 31, 2020 if we decide to use the oxide plant for the first six months of 2013 and the fourth quarter 2014.

 

 

Payable Metal

 

 

 

2013(1)

 

2014(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Silver (oz)

 

252,256

 

28,746

 

Gold (oz)

 

2,349

 

194

 

Silver equivalent (AgEq)(oz)(3)

 

416,686

 

42,326

 


(1)  Mining and processing activities were suspended at the Velardeña Properties on June 19, 2013.

(2)  Mining activities at the Velardeña Properties recommenced on July 1, 2014 and processing activities recommenced on November 3, 2014.

(3)  Equivalents calculated at 70:1 silver to gold.our own purposes before December 31, 2020.

 

The table below sets forthHecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant. During the year ended December 31, 2017, Hecla processed approximately 131,000 tonnes of material through the oxide plant, resulting in total revenues to us of approximately $6.7 million, comprised of approximately $3.0 million for direct plant charges plus fixed fees and other net reimbursable costs totaling approximately $3.7 million. We incurred costs of approximately $2.1 million related to the services we provide under the lease and reported a net operating margin of approximately $4.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. We expect Hecla to continue to process material near the intended approximately 400 tonnes per day rate during 2018, which would generate cash payments to us, net of reimbursable costs, of approximately $4.6 million during 2018. However, because Hecla has the right to terminate the lease on sixty days’ notice, there is no assurance that these amounts will be received.

Mining and Processing

There were no mining andor processing statistics ofactivities, other than the Hecla lease, at our Velardeña Properties for the first six monthsin 2016 or 2017 as a result of 2013 and the last six months of 2014.

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2013(1)

 

2014(2)

 

Tonnes Milled

 

 

 

 

 

(includes stockpiles)

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide plant

 

41,383

 

 

Sulfide plant

 

30,680

 

14,322

 

 

 

72,063

 

14,322

 

Combined plant grades

 

 

 

 

 

(Grams per tonne)

 

 

 

 

 

Silver

 

163

 

119

 

Gold

 

2.56

 

1.57

 

Combined plant recovery (3)

 

 

 

 

 

Silver

 

75.8

%

56.6

%

Gold

 

48.7

%

29.0

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contained Metals (3)

 

 

 

 

 

(includes stockpiles)

 

 

 

 

 

Silver ounces

 

286,394

 

30,615

 

Gold ounces

 

2,885

 

209

 

Silver equivalent ounces (70:1)

 

488,344

 

45,245

 

Lead - pounds (000)

 

564

 

124

 

Zinc - pounds (000)

 

836

 

155

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payable Metals (3)

 

 

 

 

 

(includes stockpiles)

 

 

 

 

 

Silver ounces

 

252,256

 

28,746

 

Gold ounces

 

2,349

 

194

 

Silver equivalent ounces (70:1)

 

393,196

 

42,326

 

Lead - pounds (000)

 

500

 

111

 

Zinc - pounds (000)

 

706

 

135

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Products sold

 

 

 

 

 

Doré - kilograms

 

 

 

Precipitate - kilograms

 

9.07

 

 

Lead concentrates - tonnes

 

1,147

 

72

 

Zinc concentrates - tonnes

 

1,054

 

36

 

Pyrite concentrates - tonnes

 

2,789

 

 

Copper concentrates - tonnes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payable metals in products sold

 

 

 

 

 

Silver ounces

 

310,791

 

9,489

 

Gold ounces

 

2,845

 

75

 

Silver equivalent ounces (70:1)

 

509,941

 

14,739

 

Lead - pounds (000)

 

720

 

40

 

Zinc - pounds (000)

 

927

 

34

 

13




(1)  Mining and processing activities were suspended at the Velardeña Properties on June 19, 2013.

(2)  Mining activities at the Velardeña Properties recommenced on July 1, 2014 and processing activities recommenced on November 3, 2014.

(3)  Current payable metals and recoveries include final metal settlements pertaining to sales of previously reported payable metals.

Following the shutdown of the Velardeña Propertiesmining and sulfide processing activities in June 2013, we continuedNovember 2015. We expect to developincur approximately $0.4 million in quarterly holding costs for as long as mining and evaluate plans to restart mining. We completed this evaluation and new mine plans in the second quarter 2014 and on July 1, 2014 we restarted mining at the Velardeña Properties and began processing material from the mine on November 3, 2014. As discussed above, during 2014 we generated payable metals totaling approximately 42,000 silver equivalent ounces (equivalents calculated at 70:1 silver to gold) and included approximately 29,000 ounces of silver and 194 ounces of gold. In 2015 we expect output of approximately 0.8 to 1.0 million silver equivalent ounces (including silver and gold but excluding lead and zinc and calculated at a ratio of 70 silver ounces to 1 gold ounce), with cash costs in 2015 between $12.00 and $15.00 per payable silver ounce net of by-product gold, lead and zinc credits, assuming a price for gold of $1,250 per ounce. “Cash costs per payable silver ounce, net of by-product credits” is a non-GAAP financial measure defined below in “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.activities remain suspended.

 

We completed the evaluation

19


We reopened Velardeña as a leaner and lower cost mine, with new management throughout the mine. We have hired 177 new employees under a new labor union agreement and are mining two ten-hour shifts per day. To date, we are employing approximately 250 people at the Velardeña Properties. This is about half of the employees prior to the June 2013 shutdown when we were running both sulfide and oxide plants and processing approximately 500 tpd.

Under our new mine plan, we are using shrinkage stope mining, standard mechanized cut and fill and an overhand cut and fill mining method and slusher mucking in the stopes in the narrower veins. This later mining method should allow us to mine vein widths as narrow as 0.5 meters, which should significantly decrease dilution and allow higher grade material to be hauled to the mill. For conservative planning purposes, we have assumed dilution of the veins to one meter widths. We are removing material from the mine using the new 1.9 kilometer San Mateo access ramp, which we completed prior to suspending mining in June 2013. This ramp is providing more efficient and lower cost removal of mined material compared to pre-suspension haulage primarily from a low capacity internal shaft. The mining plan calls for the processing of mined material to make silver and gold bearing lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. In 2014 we processed mined material to make silver and gold bearing lead and zinc concentrates, and in 2015 we expect to also make saleable pyrite concentrates.

During 2014 we focused on mining on the San Mateo, Terneras and Roca Negra veins. Drilling results and metallurgical studies indicate that these sulfide veins, mined minimally in the past, contain higher grade material over more consistent widths in the 0.5 to 1.0 meter range, with significantly lower arsenic levels than those in the Santa Juana vein system that was the focus of our previous mining activity. We expect that the lower arsenic will allow for improved payment terms and metallurgical recovery of the metals. The Roca Negra vein, not considered in the initial restart plan, should add greater flexibility in achieving the objectives of the mine plan, providing an additional vein for mining.  In 2015 we expect mining to focus primarily on the Terneras, Roca Negra and San Mateo veins with some feed coming from the Santa Juana vein.

We began processing material through the sulfide mill in November 2014. During November 2014 we tested new equipment in the mill including a revamped electrical system, concentrate filters for our concentrate products, refurbished flotation cells and other equipment. Grades were low in November 2014 as we processed material from stope access drifts and raises to test plant circuits that

14



were refurbished as part of the restart. Average grades in November were 109 grams per tonne silver and 1.3 grams per tonne gold with payable metals generated from the processing facilities of approximately 12,000 silver equivalent ounces, which is exclusive of process inventory in the circuit that required build up.  In December 2014 the mill began operating at nearly full capacity of an average 264 tpd. We are continuing to ramp up to the 285 tpd rate, which we expect to achieve late in the first quarter 2015. Average grades in December had increased to 127 grams per tonne silver and 1.8 grams per tonne gold with payable metals generated from the processing facilities of approximately 31,000 silver equivalent ounces. We expect feed material grades to gradually increase through the second quarter of 2015 as new stopes in the mine are developed and access to the Terneras vein increases. We also continue to actively search for oxide feed from outside sources, which could enable us to restart the oxide plant.

Product Mix

Our mining plan calls for the processing of mined material to make silver and gold bearing lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. In 2014 we sold from the Velardeña Properties lead and zinc concentrates containing payable quantities of silver, gold, lead and zinc, selling approximately 16,000 ounces of silver and approximately 95 ounces of gold. Silver sales accounted for approximately 70% and 65% of our revenue from saleable metals during 2014 and 2013, respectively, while gold sales accounted for approximately 30% and 35% of our revenue from saleable metals during 2014 and 2013, respectively. Except as otherwise noted, the information below discusses the product mix for 2014, which we expect to be representative of the product mix during 2015.

Concentrates

The sulfide plant at the Velardeña Properties contains a typical flotation circuit that processes material from the Velardeña Properties into lead, zinc and pyrite concentrate products.

Lead concentrates comprise approximately 50% to 60% of total concentrate products from the sulfide plant. The lead concentrates have typical assays of 30% to 35% lead, 5,000 to 6,000 grams per tonne silver, 25 to 35 grams per tonne gold, 4% to 5% zinc and 3% to 5% copper. After metal deductions, we are typically paid for 95% of contained lead, silver and gold. Concentrate treatment charges are negotiated annually and generally reflect market terms for the industry for similar products. Treatment charges in 2014 were approximately $300.00 per tonne. Additional charges are incurred for silver and gold refining, and penalties are assessed for certain elements, such as arsenic and antimony that exceed agreed limits.

Zinc concentrates comprise approximately 40% to 50% of total concentrate products from the sulfide plant. The zinc concentrates have typical assays of 50% to 55% zinc, 500 to 600 grams per tonne silver, 1 to 2 grams per tonne gold and 1% to 2% lead. After metal deductions, we are typically paid for approximately 80% of contained zinc and 55% of silver with lesser amounts payable for the contained gold. Concentrate treatment charges are negotiated annually and generally reflect market terms for the industry for similar products. Treatment charges in 2014 were approximately $260.00 per tonne. Additional charges are incurred for silver and gold refining, and penalties are assessed for certain elements, such as arsenic, that exceed agreed limits.

We did not sell any pyrite concentrates during 2014 because the contained silver and gold in the pyrite concentrates were too low to provide economic value.  Ore grades for silver and gold are anticipated to increase during 2015. We anticipate generating and selling pyrite concentrates, in addition to the lead and zinc concentrates that are generated currently. To provide economic value, pyrite concentrates generally must have assays of greater than 12 to15 grams per tonne gold. The pyrite concentrates will also typically contain approximately 200 grams per tonne silver and 33% to 38% sulfur.  In 2013, when we previously made pyrite concentrates, we were paid for approximately 60% to 65% of the contained gold and incurred treatment charges of approximately $260.00 per tonne with additional penalties assessed for certain elements, such as zinc and copper, that exceed agreed upon limits. Concentrate treatment charges are negotiated annually and generally reflect market terms for the industry for similar products. Treatment charges can vary significantly depending on the gold content of the pyrite concentrate.

In 2014 we incurred approximately $55,000 in smelting and refining charges and approximately $10,000 in penalty charges, primarily for arsenic and antimony included in our lead and zinc concentrates. Treatment and penalty charges are netted against revenue in our consolidated statement of operations.

Customers

During 2014 all of our revenues from mining were attributable to the sale of products from the Velardeña Properties, including lead and zinc concentrates. In 2014 we sold lead and zinc concentrate products to one customer under an exclusive contract that will expire on March 31, 2015. Our sales contract includes terms typical for the industry, including deductions for smelting and refining charges (or treatment charges) and penalties for contaminates present in our products sold.

Our customer contracts, including our one customer contract through March 31, 2015, are such as ordinarily accompany the kind of business conducted by us and our subsidiaries and are entered into in the ordinary course. Typically our customer contracts are not material in amount, and any contract that is material in amount is not a contract on which our business is substantially dependent.

15



Most of our customer contracts are for a term of one year or less, and many of the contract terms are negotiable during the term of the contract. The global silver and gold markets are competitive with numerous refineries willing to buy concentrates on short notice. If any one of our customer contracts were terminated, we have identified other customers during the bidding process as additional avenues in which to sell our product. We do not believe that a loss of one particular customer would materially delay, disrupt or reduce revenues in the future.

Environmental Matters and Permitting

 

We hold environmental licenses and environmental impact assessments that allow us to run our mines, plants and tailing facilities at our Velardeña Properties. In environmental reviews conducted in 2011, 2012 and 2013, we identified non-compliance matters related to our mining and processing activities that were remediated, including general site clean-up and permit renewals. We recently retained a consultant to complete an environmental review to identify and address any current non-compliance items. In 2012, for the sulfide plant, we applied for and were accepted into the Mexican National Environmental Auditing Program (“NEAP”), which allows companies to continue mining activities during the remediation of non-compliance matters. In June 2013, when we suspended mining activities at the Velardeña Properties, we suspended our participation in NEAP. Once we complete the 2015 environmental review, we plan to re-apply for acceptance into the NEAP for the sulfide plant.

We are required to update our environmental licenses and environmental impact assessments for expansion of or modification to any of the existing two processing plants. The construction of new infrastructure beyond the current plant facilities also would require additional permitting, which could include environmental impact assessments and land use permits. We do not expectare currently finalizing obtaining all permits necessary for expansion of the tailings disposal facility at our oxide plant to have difficulty obtainingaccommodate additional permits or environmental impact assessments.capacity required for production by the plant lessee.

 

Certain Laws Affecting Mining in Mexico

 

Mexico, officially the United Mexican States, is a federal constitutional republic in North America and bordered by the United States of America, Belize and Guatemala. Mexico is a federal democratic republic with 31 states and one federal district.Mexico City. Each state has its own constitution and its citizens elect a governor, as well as representatives, to their respective state congresses. The President of Mexico is the head of the executive federal government. Executive power is exercised by the President, while legislative power is vested in the two chambers of the Congress of the Union. The three constitutional powers are the Judiciary, the Executive and the Legislature which are independent of each other.

 

Legislation Affecting Mining

 

The Mining Law, originally published in 1992 and amended in 1996, 2005, 2006 and 2006,2014, is the primary legislation governing mining activities in Mexico. Other significant legislation applicable to mining in Mexico includes the regulations to the Mining Law, the Federal Law of Waters, the Federal Labour Law, the Federal Law of Fire Arms and Explosives, the General Law on Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection and regulations, the Federal Law of Duties and the Federal Law on Metrology and Standards.

 

The Concession System

 

Under Mexican law, mineral deposits are property of the Mexican republic, and a mining concession, granted by the executive branch of the federal government, is required for the exploration, exploitation and processing of mineral deposits. Mining concessions may only be granted to Mexican individuals domiciled in Mexico or companies incorporated and validly existing under the laws of Mexico. Mexican companies that have foreign shareholders must register with the National Registry of Foreign Investments and renew their registration on an annual basis. Mining concessions grant rights to explore and exploit mineral deposits but do not grant surface rights over the land where the concession is located. Mining concession holders are required to negotiate surface access with the land owner or holder (e.g., agrarian communities) or, should such negotiations prove unsuccessful, file an application with the corresponding administrative authority (Ministry of Economy or Ministry of Agrarian-Territorial-Urban Development) to obtain an easement, temporary occupancy, or expropriation of the land, as the case may be. An application for a concession must be filed with the Mining Agency or Mining Delegation located closest to the area to which the application relates.

 

Mining concessions have a term of 50 years from the date on which title is recorded in the Public Registry of Mining. Holders of mining concessions are required to comply with various obligations, including the payment of certain mining duties based on the number of hectares of the concession and the number of years the concession has been in effect. Failure to pay the mining duties can lead to cancellation of the relevant concession. Holders of mining concessions are also obliged to carry out and prove assessment works in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the Mining Law and its regulations. The regulations to the Mining Law establish minimum amounts that must be spent or invested on mining activities. A report must be filed in May of each year regarding the assessment works carried out during the preceding year. The mining authorities may impose a fine on the mining concession holder if one or more proof of assessment work reports is not timely filed.

 

16


20



Pursuant to amendments to the federal corporate income tax law, effective January 2014, additional duties are imposed on mining concession holders; see “—Taxes in Mexico”.

 

Environmental Legislation

 

Mining projects in Mexico are subject to Mexican federal, state and municipal environmental laws and regulations for the protection of the environment. The principal legislation applicable to mining projects in Mexico is the federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection, which is enforced by the Federal Bureau of Environmental Protection, commonly known as “PROFEPA”. PROFEPA is the federal entity in charge of carrying out environmental inspections and negotiating compliance agreements. Voluntary environmental audits, coordinated through PROFEPA, are encouraged under the federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection. PROFEPA monitors compliance with environmental legislation and enforces Mexican environmental laws, regulations and official standards. If warranted, PROFEPA may initiate administrative proceedings against companies that violate environmental laws, which proceedings may result in the temporary or permanent closure of non-complying facilities, the revocation of operating licenses and/or other sanctions or fines. According to the Federal Criminal Code, PROFEPA must inform the relevant governmental authorities of any environmental crimes that are committed by a mining company in Mexico.

 

Concession holders under the exploration stage may submit themselves to comply with the Mexican Official Norm: NOM-120-SEMARNAT-1997, which provides, among other things, that mining exploration activities to be carried out within certain areas must be conducted in accordance with the environmental standards set forth in NOM-120-SEMARNAT-1997; otherwise, concession holders are required to file a preventive report or an environmental impact study prior to the commencement of the exploration, exploitation and processing of mineral resources. However, anAn environmental impact study may not be necessary if the concessionaire files an application with the environmental authorities confirming the concessionaire’s commitment to observeis required for exploitation and comply with NOM-120-SEMARNAT-1997.processing of mineral resources activities.

 

In 2014 Mexico developed an Energy sector applicable to private investment companies whereby new mining concessions are now subject to prior approval from the Ministry of Energy. Current mining concessions forming the Velardeña Properties are not subject to or affected by this approval requirement, but any new mining concessions acquired will be subject to this additional approval.

 

Taxes in Mexico

 

Mexico has a federal corporate income tax rate of 30%, and there are no state taxes on corporate net income. In determining their corporate income tax, entities are allowed to subtract from gross income various deductions permitted by law, and they are allowed a ten-year carry-forward of net operating losses. Pursuant to amendments to the federal tax laws effective January 1, 2014, a 10% withholding tax is charged on dividends distributed to shareholders, regardless of the tax residence of the recipient, out of after tax profits. However, in the case of nonresident shareholders the limitations and tax rates provided in the treaties to avoid double taxation will prevail. A foreign resident company is subject to income tax if it has a permanent establishment in Mexico. In general, a permanent establishment is a place of business where the activities of an enterprise are totally or partially carried out and includes, among others, offices, branches and mining sites.

 

Under the 2014 amendments to the federal corporate income tax law, titleholders of mining concessions are required to pay an annual special duty of 7.5% of their mining related profits. Titleholders of mining concessions also are required to pay a 0.5% special mining duty, or royalty, on an annual basis, on revenues obtained from the sale of silver, gold and platinum. Both the 7.5% annual special duty and the 0.5% duty are due at the end of March each year. The special duty of 7.5% is generally applicable to earnings before income tax, depreciation, depletion, amortization, and interest.  In calculating the special duty of 7.5%, there are no deductions related to depreciable costs from operational fixed assets, but exploration and prospecting depreciable costs are deductible when incurred.  Both duties are tax deductible for income tax purposes.

21


Mexico has several taxes in addition to income tax that are relevant to most business operations, including (i) the Value Added Tax (“VAT”); (ii) import duties; (iii) various payroll taxes; and (iv) statutorily entitled employee profit sharing (“PTU”); and (v) mining duties and royalties..  In addition, annual mining concession fees are charged by the government.

 

VAT in Mexico is charged upon alienation of goods, performance of independent services, grant of temporary use or exploitation of goods, or import of goods or services that occur within Mexico’s borders, at a rate of 16%. There is no VAT in the case of export of goods or services or for the sale of gold, jewelry, and gold metalwork with a minimum gold content of 80%, excluding retail sale to the general public. The sale of mining concessions is subject to VAT as concessions are not considered to be land. VAT paid by a business enterprise on its purchases and expenses may usually be credited against its liability for VAT collected from customers on its own sales. In addition, VAT may also be refunded, or overpayments may be used to offset tax liabilities arising from other federal taxes.

 

Import duties apply for goods and services entering the country, unless specifically exempted due to a free trade agreement or if registered under specific programs like IMMEX, under which we are currently registered. Payroll taxes are payable in most states including Durango and Coahuila, and social security, housing and pension contributions must be made to the federal government when paying salaries.

 

Employees of Mexico entities are statutorily entitled to a portion of the employer’s pre-tax profits, called PTU. The rate of profit sharing is currently 10% of the employer’s taxable income as defined by the Income Tax law. A taxpayer may reduce its income

17



tax base by an amount equal to the PTU. Certain companies are exempt from paying PTU, which include companies in the extractive industry (principally the mining industry) during the period of exploration.

 

Under the 2013 amendments to the federal corporate income tax law, titleholders of mining concessions are required to pay an annual special duty of 7.5% of their mining related profits, determined by deducting from mining related revenues certain specified types of cash expenditures. Payment of the special duty will be due at the end of March each year commencing in 2015.El Quevar

 

Titleholders of mining concessions also will be required to pay a 0.5% special mining duty, or royalty, on an annual basis, on revenues obtained from the sale of silver, gold and platinum. Similar to the 7.5% annual special duty, the 0.5% duty will be due at the end of March each year commencing in 2015.

El Quevar

Location and Access

 

Our El Quevar silver project is located in the San Antonio de los Cobres municipality, Salta Province, in the altiplano region of northwestern Argentina, approximately 300 kilometers by road northwest of the city of Salta, the capital city of the province. The project is also accessible by a 300 kilometer dirt and gravel road from the city of Calama in northern Chile. The small village of Pocitos, located about 20 kilometers to the west of El Quevar, is the nearest settlement. We have established a camp approximately 10 kilometers west of the project to house project workers. A high tension power line is located approximately 40 kilometers from the site, and a high pressure gas line devoted to the mining industry and subsidized by the Salta government is located within four kilometers of the El Quevar camp.

 

The El Quevar project is located near Nevado Peak with altitudes at the concessions ranging from 3,800 to 6,130 meters above sea level. The climate of the area is high mountain desert, with some precipitation in summer (such as snow) and little snow in winter.

 

22


The following map shows the location of the El Quevar project.

 

 

18



Property History

 

Mining activity in and around the El Quevar project dates back at least 80 years. Between 1930 and 1950, there was lead and silver extraction of mineralized materials from small workings in the area, but we have no mining records from that period. The first organized exploration activities on the property occurred during the 1970s, although no data from that period remains. Over the last 30 years, several companies have carried out exploration activity in the area, including BHP Billiton, Industrias Peñoles, Mansfield Minerals and Hochschild Mining Group, consisting primarily of local sampling with some limited drilling programs.

 

Title and Ownership Rights

 

According to Argentine law, mineral resources are subject to regulation in the provinces where the resources are located. Each province has the authority to grant mining exploration permits and mining exploitation concession rights to applicants. The Federal Congress has enacted the National Mining Code and other substantive mining legislation, which is applicable throughout Argentina; however, each province has the authority to regulate the procedural aspects of the National Mining Code and to organize the enforcement authority within its own territory.

23


 

In the province of Salta, where the El Quevar project is located, all mining concessions are granted by a judge in the Salta Mining Court. The El Quevar project is comprised of exploitation concessions. Exploitation concessions are subject to a canon payment fee (maintenance fee) which is paid in advance twice a year (before June 30th and December 31st of each calendar year). Each time a new mining concession is granted, concession holders are exempt from the canon payment fee for a period of three years from the concession grant date. However, this exemption does not apply to the grant of vacant exploitation concessions; only to the grant of new mining concessions.

 

The El Quevar project is currently comprised of 3231 mining concessions. Weconcessions we hold 31 of the concessions directly, and we control the Nevado I concession, located approximately four kilometers from the Yaxtché target, pursuant to a purchase option agreement with the third party concession owner. We made one payment in 2014 totaling $50,000 on the Nevado I option agreement. Our remaining payment on the option agreement totals $550,000 and has been extended to June 2015.directly. In total, the El Quevar project encompasses approximately 59,00057,000 hectares. The area of most of our exploration activities at El Quevar is within the concessions that are owned by Silex Argentina S.A., our wholly-owned subsidiary.

 

We are required to pay a 1% net smelter return royalty on the value of all minerals extracted from the El Quevar II concession and a 1% net smelter return royalty on one-half of the minerals extracted from the Castor concession to the third party from whom we acquired these concessions.  We can purchase one half of the royalty for $1 million in the first two years of production.  The Yaxtché deposit is located primarily on the Castor concession. We aremay also be required to pay a 3% royalty to the Salta Province based on the mine mouthnet smelter value of minerals extracted from any of our concessions.concessions less costs of processing. To maintain all of the El Quevar concessions, in 2014, we paid canon payment fees to the Argentine government of approximately $35,000.$116,000 and $111,000 in 2016 and 2017, respectively. In 20152018 we expect to pay approximately $110,000. The increase in 2015 and subsequent years is the result$93,000. 

24


The following El Quevar mine concessions are identified below by name and file number in the Salta Province Registry of Mines.

 

Name of Mine Concession

Concession

File Number

Quevar II

 

17114

Nevado I

 

18359

Quirincolo I

 

18036

Quirincolo II

 

18037

Castor

 

3902

Vince

 

1578

Armonia

 

1542

Quespejahuar

 

12222

Toro I

 

18332

Quevar Primera

 

19534

Quevar Novena

 

20215

Quevar Decimo Tercera

 

20501

Quevar Tercera

 

19557

Quevar Vigesimo Tercero

 

21043

Quevar 10

 

20219

Quevar Vigesimo Primera

 

20997

Quevar Vigesimo Septima(1)Septima

 

22403

Quevar IV

 

19558

Quevar Vigesimo Cuarto

 

21044

Quevar 11

 

20240

Quevar Quinta

 

19617

Quevar 12

 

20360

Quevar Decima Quinta

 

20445

Quevar Sexta

 

19992

Quevar 19

 

20706

Quevar Vigesimo Sexta

 

22087

Quevar Vigesimo Segundo

 

21042

Quevar Séptima

 

20319

Quevar Veinteava

 

20988

MARIANA CANTERA

 

15190

Arjona II

 

18080

Quevar Vigesimo Quinto

 

21054

19




(1) The Quevar Vigesimo Septima concession is still undergoing the registration process with the Salta Province Mining Court. We expect final registration in the second quarter 2015.

 

The surface rights at El Quevar are controlled by the Salta Province. There are no private properties within the concession area. To date, no issues involving surface rights have impacted the project. Although we have unrestricted access to our facilities, we have been granted easements to further protect our access rights.

 

Geology and Mineralization

 

The geology of the El Quevar project is characterized by silver-rich veins and disseminations in Tertiary volcanic rocks that are part of an eroded stratovolcano. Silver mineralization at El Quevar is hosted within a broad, generally east-west-trending structural zone and occurs as a series of north-dipping parallel sheeted vein zones, breccias and mineralized

25


faults situated within an envelope of pervasively silicified brecciated volcanic rocks. There are at least three sub-parallel structures that extend for an aggregate length of approximately 6.5 kilometers. Several volcanic domes (small intrusive bodies) have been identified and mineralization is also found in breccias associated with these domes, especially where they are intersected by the structures. The silver mineralization at the Yaxtché zone is of epithermal origin. The cross-cutting nature of the mineralization, the assemblage of sulfide and alteration minerals, and the presence of open spaces with euhedral minerals, all point to an origin at shallow to moderate depths (a few hundred meters below surface) from hydrothermal solutions.

 

2012 Technical Report

Mineralized Material Estimate

During 2012, RungePincockMinarco (“RPM”) completedwe released an updated estimate of mineralized material at our El Quevar project.  This SEC Industry Guide 7 estimate assumed mining of oxide material from an open pit on the east end of the Yaxtché deposit and sulfide material from both the open pit and an underground mine on the western portion of the Yaxtché deposit.  According to the RPMThe estimate was based on results from 270 core drill holes,holes. 

In 2017, Amec Foster Wheeler E&C Services, Inc., a Wood Group PLC company (“Wood”) undertook an analysis and re-modeling of the data utilized in the prior mineralized material estimate using updated geologic controls and a modeling method that optimizes grade. This resulted in an updated mineralized material estimate completed in February 2018.  The Wood estimate assumes mining would occur solely underground and would be optimized to maximize potential silver grades.  According to the Wood estimate, sulfide mineralized material in the Yaxtché zone, at a cut-off grade of 26250 grams per tonne silver, for the open pit and 100 grams per tonne silver for underground material, and using a three-year average silver price of $24.41$16.62 per ounce, was as follows:

Tonnes
(000s)

 

Average silver
grade (grams/tonne)

 

6,024

 

147.5

 

The RPM estimate includes a smaller tonnage2.6 million tonnes at an average silver grade of mineralized material in the possible open pit at a higher likely grade as compared to the technical report prepared by RPM pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101 (“43-101”). In the RPM report pursuant to 43-101, RPM used inferred resources beneficially to the possible operation in the optimization of a resource level open pit. When preparing its mineralized material estimate under Industry Guide 7, RPM did not use the inferred resources calculated pursuant to 43-101 to beneficially optimize the pit. As such, optimization without the benefit of inferred material yielded a smaller tonnage of mineralized material in the possible open pit at a higher likely grade as compared to the RPM report pursuant to 43-101.

487 grams per tonne.

For further detail regarding mineralized material, see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING MINERALIZED MATERIAL”.

 

20



Exploration and Advancement of El Quevar

 

The Yaxtché deposit is the primary target currently identified at the El Quevar project. We believe that the El Quevar deposit may be amenable to bulk mining, which could include an open pit on the eastern and central areas of the Yaxtché deposit and bulk underground mining in the western area. Our work indicates that the Yaxtché deposit is at least 2 kilometers in strike length and is continuous laterally and to depths of more than 300 meters below surface in the main area. More recent results also support a possible eastward extension of the Yaxtché deposit and recognize an emerging new mineralized trend five kilometers north of the Yaxtché deposit. We continuehave continued to hold our El Quevar property on care and maintenance until we can fund further exploration ourselves or find a partner to fund further exploration. We have completed environmental baseline studies, and a further environmental impact assessment process would be required to support the permits necessary for construction and mining. If the El Quevar project proceeds to development and construction, we would be required to obtain numerous additional permits from national, provincial and municipal authorities in Argentina.

 

In 2014 weWe spent approximately $1.6$0.8 million and  $0.5 million at our El Quevar project on holding and maintenance costs.costs in 2017 and 2016, respectively. From the inception of our exploration activities in 2004 through December 31, 20142017 we have spent approximately $74.2$76.6 million on exploration and related activities at El Quevar. In 20152018 we expect to spend approximately $1.0 million at our El Quevar project onto fund ongoing exploration and evaluation activities, care and maintenance and property holding costs.

 

We are evaluating plans for further exploration drilling to increase the size of high grade silver resources near the Yaxtché deposit.  The Yaxtché deposit is open to the west and there are numerous drill intercepts with silver grades of economic interest in the nearby area that represent targets for further expansion. During 2017, we received $1.1 million in refunds of previous VAT payments made in Argentina during 2012 and 2013.  The refunds, available through certain

26


provisions in the Argentina Mining Investment Law, have been pending for several years, but were only recently approved for payment by the Argentine tax authority.  In February 2018 we received an additional $138,000 of VAT refunds and we have approximately $0.1 million of VAT refund claims remaining.

We plan to continue to advance El Quevar as much as possible within the limits of our current exploration budget and remain open to finding a partner to contribute to the funding of further exploration and development.

Exploration Properties

 

In addition to El Quevar, we currently control a portfolio of approximately 3010 exploration properties located primarily in certain traditional precious metals producing regions of Mexico. We do not consider any of our exploration properties to be material, including those noted below.

 

In 20152018 we plan to focus our exploration efforts primarily on selected targetsexploration and evaluation activities at Santa Maria, Yoquivo and other properties, primarily in Mexico. We are focused on establishing a second group of mining assets, which may include those recently acquired assets in the Parral District in Chihuahua Mexico, in order to generate sufficient revenue, along with revenue from our Velardeña Properties, to fund our continuing business activities. During 20152018 we expect our expenditures for the exploration program to total approximately $3.1$2.0 million, with approximately $0.4$0.3 million of which is expected to be attributable toin property holding costs in Mexico and approximately $0.5 million in administrative and general reconnaissance costs in Mexico.

 

The Parral District

Los Azules (Mexico)

Santa Maria

In 2013 we acquired the 233 hectare Los Azules property in Chihuahua, Mexico under a purchase agreement with Minera Socavato, a private Mexico mining company. The purchase agreement, which we can terminate at any time following a short notice period, requires a series of option payments over a four-year period totaling $2.0 million, with approximately $1.7 million to be paid in 2016 and 2017, and a 5% net smelter return royalty, half of which may be repurchased for $1.0 million.

The Los Azules property is located 20 kilometers west of San Francisco de Oro in southernmost Chihuahua, Mexico.  Los Azules hosts a north south trending gold bearing epithermal quartz vein system cutting Tertiary felsic volcanics and a felsic hypabyssal stock.  We hold the concessions in the Los Azules property through our wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary Minera de Cordilleras, S. De R.L. de C.V.

In the first quarter 2014, we completed a 2,000 meter drill program to test down dip targets on the previously mined vein system. Based on results from this phase one drilling program, we conducted a phase two drill program and have completed in both programs a total of 7,475 meters in 30 holes drilled from both surface and underground. Based on these drill results and underground sampling, we believe we have identified a silver and gold deposit and expect to issue a report regarding the results of these programs in the first quarter 2015.

Santa Maria (Mexico)

On August 1, 2014, we entered into an option agreement giving us the right to acquire for $1.6$1.2 million the Santa Maria mine, a privately held property comprised of a single mining claim of 18 hectares near thewest of Hildalgo de Parral, District of southern Chihuahua State, Mexico, located approximately 20 kilometersMexico. Since 2015, we have completed test mining and processing of 7,500 tons from the Los Azules project. Santa Maria mine, with average grades 338 gpt silver and 0.7 gpt gold. In March 2017 a preliminary economic assessment (“PEA”) was completed on our behalf by Tetra Tech, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on an updated estimate of mineralized material. The PEA presented a base case assessment of developing Santa Maria’s mineral deposit.  The PEA contemplates a 38-month underground mining operation at a mining rate of 200 tonnes per day using a combination of cut and fill and other mining techniques, and custom milling at a local third-party flotation mill.  Based on the assumptions in the PEA, we believe there may be potential to develop a small mining operation at Santa Maria.

In August 2017, we acquired three additional claims that cover the eastward extension of the Santa Maria vein. The new claims provide a 600 meter potential extension to the strike length of the vein system and add substantial downdip expansion potential.  In August 2017, we also commenced a new drill program targeting extensions of the vein deposit described in the PEA and recent estimate of mineralized material with the goal of expanding the existing estimate of mineralized material to improve the overall economics reported in the PEA. 

Through the end of 2017, we drilled fourteen holes totaling approximately 3,300 meters, and have received completed assay results showing mineralized intercepts in most of the holes.  We increased the drill program from an original 2,000 meters to about 4,800 meters due to geologic complexity along the eastern extension and newly encountered mineralization on the western extension of the vein system.  Based on the results of the 2017 drilling program, we anticipate that we will be able to increase the size of the existing mineralized material estimate, although the extent of that increase has not yet been determined.  We are continuing to drill in 2018 and have completed 1,000 meters in five drill holes.  We will likely complete another 500 meters in three additional drill holes before completing the program, after which we plan to review the drill results and revise the existing PEA and mineralized material estimate.

We have the right to acquire the Santa Maria property under two separate option agreements representing the total concessions that comprise the property for additional payments of $1.4 million, payable through April 2022. The first option agreement, covering concessions we acquired in August 2014, requires an additional approximately $0.7 million be paid to acquire a 100% interest in the concessions related to that option by continuing to make minimum payments of $0.1 million in 2018 and $0.2 million in each of the years 2019 through 2021.  In addition, until the total due under the first option agreement has been paid, the property owners have the right to 50% of any net profits from mining activities

27


from the concessions related to the option, after reimbursement of all costs incurred by us since April 2015, to the extent that such net profit payments exceed the minimum payments.  The second option agreement, covering concessions recently acquired in August 2017, requires an additional approximately $0.7 million be paid to acquire a 100% interest in the concessions related to that option by making additional payments of $0.1 million in 2018 and $0.2 million in each of the years 2019 through 2021.

Rodeo

We acquired the Rodeo and Rodeo 2 claims comprising 1,866 hectares 80 kilometers west of the Velardeña Properties in Durango, Mexico where previous exploration by other companies has identified a gold-bearing epithermal system exposed at the surface. During 2016, we completed a 2,080 meter core drilling program at the Rodeo property at a cost of approximately $0.4 million. The results from the program show a gold and silver bearing epithermal vein and breccia system with encouraging gold and silver values over an approximate 50 to 70 meter true width.  The system is exposed at the top of a northwesterly striking ridge and dips steeply to the northeast over about one kilometer of strike length.

During January 2017, Tetra Tech completed an estimate of mineralized material at the Rodeo deposit, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on two different operating scenarios.  The first operating scenario reflects a smaller amount of higher grade material and estimated mineralized material of 0.4 million tonnes containing 3.3 gpt gold and 11 gpt silver for a total of 46,000 ounces of gold and 0.2 million ounces of silver. This scenario provides a potentially shorter time to processing with lower capital costs since we already own the mill, located within trucking distance of the Rodeo property.  The second operating scenario reflects a larger amount of lower grade material and estimated mineralized material of 3.6 million tonnes containing 0.8 gpt gold and 12 gpt silver.  The second mineralized material estimate envisions a standalone heap leach operation, depending on leachability of the material and development and operating costs. We believe this material, as currently identified, could provide additional mined material for ourVelardeña oxide mill following the completion of the Hecla lease, currently set to expire December 31, 2020.

In initial drill programtest work conducted in 2017, we have received confirmation of 11 holesgood gold and silver metallurgical recoveries for milled material in initial test work. Bottle roll cyanide leach testing of the high-grade samples resulted in gold extractions of 80 to 86 percent. Silver extractions ranged from 72 to 76 percent for all tests. Test work also indicates that the material is not suitable for gold and silver recovery by heap leaching.

Due to the extension of the lease period for the oxide mill, plans to advance the Rodeo project have been delayed until later in 2018.

Celaya Farm-out

In August 2016, our wholly owned Mexican subsidiary entered into an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum Global Holdings, L.P., a privately owned company (together “Electrum”), related to our Celaya exploration property in Mexico. We received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling 2,300 meters at Santa Maria and identifiedleast $0.5 million within the first year of the agreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurred on the property since December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program. Electrum, at its option, can elect to acquire an undivided 60% interest in a joint venture company to be formed to hold the Celaya project after incurring exploration expenditures totaling $2.5 million during the initial first three years of the agreement. Electrum would serve as manager of the joint venture.  Prior to an amendment to the agreement, we would have been allowed to maintain a 40% interest in the Celaya project, following the initial three-year earn-in period, by contributing our pro-rata share of an additional $2.5 million in exploration or development expenditures incurred over a second three-year period.  In February 2018, we amended the Celaya earn-in agreement to permit Electrum to earn, at its option, an additional 20% interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a payment of $ 1.0 million.  Electrum can now increase its total interest in the project to 80% by contributing 100% of the $2.5 million of additional expenditures required in the second three-year earn-in period.  Following the second earn-in period we will have the right to maintain our 20%

28


participating interest or our interest ultimately could be converted into a carried 10% net profits interest if we elect not to participate as a joint venture owner.

The 6,200-hectare silver and gold deposit. We expect to issue a report on the results in the first quarter 2015. Initial payments of $190,000 have been made toward the purchase of the claim with the next optional payment of $410,000 due in April 2015, and subsequent payments of $500,000 due every six months until the full $1.6 million is paid.

21



Celaya

Our Celaya properties total 6,000 hectares encompassingproject contains a strongly developed alteration system on the main Mexico Silver Beltsilver belt trend, located approximately 10 kmkilometers east of the Plata LatinaLatina’s Naranjillo silver and gold discovery and 50 km45 kilometers southeast of and on trend with the historic Guanajuato District. We have conducted mapping and sampling activities at Celaya since 2012.  We completed a 2,000 meter, three-hole drilling program in 2015 that identified epithermal gold and silver mineralization beneath a portion of the widespread clay-silica alteration on the claims comprising the project.

Electrum Global Holdings’ Mexican subsidiary, Minera Adularia, has reported the completion of 12,400 meters of drilling on the property in fifteen drill holes in their ongoing drill program through the end of 2017.  Results to date show intercepts of epithermal quartz vein mineralization with grades for gold, silver, lead and zinc that warrant further drill testing.

Other Exploration Activities

Mogotes

During the fourth quarter of 2017 we completed a 2,580 meter drill program on our Mogotes property on the El Mogote claim located 7 kilometers southeast of the historictown of Velardeña, Durango, Mexico. The drill program was planned to test an area of silicification and producing veinsbreccias hosted in volcanic rocks. The altered area is exposed over a strike length of 1.5 kilometers and a width of about 500 meters. Results from the drill program showed low grade gold mineralization in two of the Guanajuato district. Since 2012 we have been conducting mapping and sampling exploration activities onholes. The epithermal system appears to be more deeply centered than the properties.  In 2015 we plan to drill test northwest trending, southwest dipping structures we believe represent the tops of epithermal veins. Clay and silica alteration hosting strongly anomalous arsenic and antimonysurface geochemical values characterize these target areas at surface.  We plan to start a 2,000 meter initial drill program in the first half of 2015.

Other

Zacatecas (Mexico)

Our 100% controlled Zacatecas silver and base metals project in Mexico is in an advanced stage of exploration. Although we believe that the Zacatecas project may contain significant silver and other mineralization, we have not completed a feasibility study on the property, and the property may not advance further.initially indicated. 

 

The Zacatecas Mining DistrictMogotes property was purchased from Silver Standard Resources in 2015 and is located in the central partwholly owned by one of Mexico, in the Faja de Plata mineral belt. Our Zacatecas project surrounds the municipalities of Zacatecas, Veta Grande, Guadalupe, Pánuco, and Morelos in the state of Zacatecas, Mexico. We own approximately 149 concessions totaling approximately 7,900 hectares in the Zacatecas project.

To maintain all of the concessions in the Zacatecas project, we pay approximately $120,000 per yearGolden Minerals’ Mexican subsidiaries, subject to the Mexican government. We are party to a finder’s fee agreement with an individual, which requires that we pay a 1% net smelter return royalty on any mineral production from certain of our Zacatecas claims. We also have the obligation to pay a 1% net smelter return royalty on the San Sabino concession, which we may buy back for $1.0 million and a 2% net smelter return royalty on the San Gil concession. For the San Gil concession, on the first anniversaryto Silver Standard and a pre-existing finder’s fee agreement (2% of production, we will be required to purchase the San Gil royalty for $575,000. At that time we will no longer be obligated to pay the 2% royalty.direct exploration and development expenditures, capped at $365,000).

 

San Diego (Mexico)Additional targeting work is being carried out on the Mogotes claims including geologic mapping and sampling focused on several outcropping veins in the northern portion of the claims and on our adjacent Pistachon claim, part of the Chicago mine holdings.  Previous work on the Mogotes property identified the possible continuation of Industrias Peñoles’ Santa Maria silver-zinc mine mineralization onto our Mogotes claims. 

Yoquivo

In October 2017 we acquired the right to purchase claims covering the Yoquivo District, Ocampo Municipality, Chihuahua through an option agreement.  The Yoquivo District is a past producing, bonanza grade epithermal vein gold and silver district located 35 kilometers southeast of the Ocampo Mining District.  We have the right to purchase six claims totaling 1,906 hectares for payment of $0.5 million over four years plus outstanding claim taxes totaling approximately$0.1 million.  No cash payments to the owner are due until the second anniversary of the agreement.  The owner retains a 2% net smelter return royalty capped at $2.0 million.

 

We own a 50% interest in the San Diego silver and gold exploration property, which is subject to a joint venture agreement between ECU and Golden Tag Resources Ltd. (“Golden Tag”), with each company holding 50% of the joint venture. The property consists of four concessions and the exploration activities of the joint venture are currently managed by Golden Tag. Until March 2015, Golden Tag has the option to earn an additional 10% interest in this joint venture by making expenditures related to further exploration drilling and completing an updated resource assessment.  We hold the concessions in the San Diego property through our wholly-owned Mexican subsidiary Minera William S.A. de C.V.

The San Diego property, located in the State of Durango, Mexico, is situated approximately nine kilometers northeast of the Velardeña Properties and contains the La Cruz-La Rata and El Trovador mines as well as a number of other shallower shafts which were sunk on narrower veins such as the Cantarranas, Montanez and El Jal. The mineralization at San Diego is similar in many respects to that at our Velardeña Properties but appears to contain less gold.

Farm-outs, Royalties and Other Dispositions

 

Exploration properties that we choose not to advance are evaluated for joint venture, sale of all or a partial interest and royalty potential. We currently have minority ownership interests and/or royalties in or have disposed of the following properties that were once part of our exploration portfolio:

·Zacatecas Royalty (Mexico)With respect to certain concessions in a portion

29


·

Zacatecas. In April 2016, we entered into an option agreement under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santacruz”) may acquire our interest in certain nonstrategic mineral claims located in Mexico sold to a subsidiary of Capstone Mining Corp. in 2009, we are entitled to a net smelter return of 1.5% on the first one million tonnes of production from the concessions sold, and a 3% net smelter return on production in excess of one million tonnes from the concessions sold. Additionally, the Zacatecas Mining District, Zacatecas, Mexico (the “Zacatecas Properties”) for a series of payments totaling $1.5 million, including a final payment of $0.5 million due in April 2018.  To date, Santacruz has paid us approximately $0.9 million. We amended the option agreement with Santacruz in February 2018 to extend the due dates for the remaining series of payments through September 2018. To complete the acquisition of the Zacatecas Properties, Santacruz must now make three additional payments of $225,000 each in March, June and September 2018. Santacruz has the right to terminate the option agreement at any time, and the agreement could be terminated, at our option, if Santacruz fails to make subsequent payments when due.

·

San Diego Exploration Property. In August 2016, we sold our remaining 50% interest in the San Diego property in Mexico to Golden Tag Resources, Ltd (“Golden Tag”), which held the other 50% interest in the property, for approximately $379,000 in cash and 2,500,000 common shares of Golden Tag. Pursuant to the sales agreement, Golden Tag will be required to pay us a 2.0% net smelter return royalty in respect to the San Diego property. We continue to hold 7,500,000 common shares of Golden Tag, representing approximately 10% of its outstanding common shares.

·

Sale of Mining Equipment. In August 2016, we sold certain mining equipment to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of The Sentient Group, a related party, for $687,000. The equipment sold was excess equipment held at our Velardeña Properties that we did not expect to use. We received $69,000 or 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale, with the remaining $618,000 plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10% to be due in February 2017. With the approval of a Special Committee of our Board of Directors, we amended the original equipment sale with Minera Indé on March 31, 2017 to include the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000 and extend the time for payment relating to the original equipment sale.  Upon execution of the amendment, the Company received an additional payment of $100,000. The remaining principal and interest balance, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, was amended to be due in August 2017. On May 2, 2017, we received approximately $750,000 from Minera Indé as payment in full for the remaining balance due related to the equipment sale, including interest through that date.  

·

Zacatecas Royalty (Mexico)With respect to certain concessions in a portion of our Zacatecas project in Mexico sold to a subsidiary of Capstone Mining Corp. in 2009, we are entitled to a net smelter return of 1.5% on the first one million tonnes of production, and a 3% net smelter return on production in excess of one million tonnes.  The net smelter return on production in excess of one million tonnes escalates by 0.5% for each $0.50 increment in copper price above $3.00 per pound of copper. There is currently no production on these concessions.

·

Fortuna Royalty (Peru). We are entitled to a net smelter return of 2.5% from a mining claim in Peru we sold to Compañia Minera Fortuna in August 2012. There is currently no production related to this claim.

 

· Fortuna Royalty (Peru)We are entitled to a net smelter return of 2.5% from a mining claim in Peru we sold to Compañia Minera Fortuna in August 2012. There is currently no production related to this claim.

·Zacatecas Concessions (Mexico)During the third quarter 2014 we sold 45 mining concessions totaling 770 hectares located in the Zacatecas District, Zacatecas State, Mexico, to Capstone Mining Group for the sum of $700,000 and recorded a $0.5 million gain on the sale.

22



· Minera Silex Peru Sale (Peru)During the third quarter 2014 we entered into an option agreement with a private party to sell our 1,100 hectare Peruvian Otuzco property for $450,000. At that time we had received $150,000 under this agreement, with the remainder payable in 2015 if the option is maintained and exercised.

Executive Officers of Golden Minerals

 

Name

Age

Position

Jeffrey G. Clevenger

 

65

 

Chairman,

Name

Age

Position

Warren M. Rehn

63

President and Chief Executive Officer

Deborah J. Friedman(1)

62

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Warren M. RehnRobert P. Vogels

 

60

Senior Vice President, Exploration and Chief Geologist

Robert P. Vogels

57

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


(1)Ms. Friedman is a partner at Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP and devotes approximately half her time to service as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Golden Minerals.

 

Jeffrey G. Clevenger.  Mr. Clevenger has served as our Chairman of the Board and as our President and Chief Executive Officer since March 2009. He served as a director and President and Chief Executive Officer of Apex Silver from October 2004 until March 2009. Mr. Clevenger worked as an independent consultant from 1999 when Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, his previous employer, was sold until he joined us in 2004. Mr. Clevenger served as Senior Vice President and Executive Vice President of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company from 1993 to 1998 and 1998 to 1999, respectively, and as President of Cyprus Climax Metals Company and its predecessor, Cyprus Copper Company, a large integrated producer of copper and molybdenum with operations in North and South America, from 1993 to 1999. He was Senior Vice President of Cyprus Copper Company from August 1992 to January 1993. From 1973 to 1992, Mr. Clevenger held various technical, management and executive positions at Phelps Dodge Corporation, including President and General Manager of Phelps Dodge Morenci, Inc. He is a Member of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers and the Metallurgical Society of America. Mr. Clevenger holds a B.S. in Mining Engineering with Honors from the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology and is a graduate of the Advanced International Senior Management Program of Harvard University.

Deborah J. Friedman.  Ms. Friedman was appointed Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary in March 2009. She served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Apex Silver from July 2007 until March 2009. Ms. Friedman is also a partner at Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP, where her practice focuses primarily on securities, finance and transactional matters for publicly-traded mining companies. She was on leave from Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP from July 2007 to May 2009 while she was employed by Apex Silver. Ms. Friedman has been a partner at Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP since August 2000, and she was of counsel to the firm from May 1999 through August 2000. From 1982 through 1994, Ms. Friedman held various positions in the law department of Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, including General Counsel and Associate General Counsel, and served from 1994 to 1998 as the General Counsel of AMAX Gold Inc. Prior to working for Cyprus, Ms. Friedman was an associate in several Denver law firms from 1977 to 1982. Ms. Friedman holds a B.A. in History from the University of Illinois and a J.D. from the University of Michigan Law School.

Warren M. Rehn.  Mr. Rehn was appointed Vice President Explorationof our company in May 2015 and appointed Chief GeologistExecutive Officer and director in February 2012 and subsequently promoted toSeptember 2015. Mr. Rehn previously served as Senior Vice President, Exploration and Chief Geologist insince December 2012 and served as Vice President, Exploration and Chief Geologist since February 2012. From 2006 until February 2012, Mr. Rehn held various positions at Barrick Gold Exploration, Inc., serving most recently as

30


Chief Exploration Geologist for the Bald Mountain and Ruby Hill mining units. From 2005 until 2007, Mr. Rehn was a consulting geologist for Gerson Lehman Group, which provides consulting services to various industries, including geology and mining. Mr. Rehn served as a Consulting Senior Geologist at Placer Dome Exploration, Inc. in 2004 and as an independent consulting geologist throughout the Americas from 1994 until 2003. He served as a Senior Geologist at Noranda Exploration, Inc. from 1988 until 1994. Mr. Rehn holds an M.S. in Geology from the Colorado School of Mines and a B.S. in Geological Engineering from the University of Idaho.

 

Robert P. Vogels.  Mr. Vogels was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in March 2009. Mr. Vogels served as Controller of Apex Silver from January 2005 to March 2009 and was named Vice President in January 2006. Prior to joining Apex Silver, Mr. Vogels served as corporate controller for Meridian Gold Company from January 2004 until December 2004. He served as the controller of INCO Limited’s Goro project in New Caledonia from October 2002 to January 2004. Prior to joining INCO, Mr. Vogels worked from 1985 through October 2002 for Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, which was acquired in 1999 by Phelps Dodge Corp. During that time, he served in several capacities, including as the controller for its El Abra copper mine in Chile from 1997 until March 2002. Mr. Vogels began his career in public accounting as a CPA. He holds a B.Sc. in accounting and an MBA degree from Colorado State University.

 

23



Board of Directors of Golden Minerals

 

Name

Age

Occupation

Jeffrey G. Clevenger

 

65

Name

Age

Occupation

Jeffrey G. Clevenger

68

 

Chairman

Warren M. Rehn

63

President and Chief Executive Officer, Company

W. Durand Eppler (1),(3)

61

Partner, Sierra Partners, LLC

Michael T. Mason (3)

70

Chief Executive Officer and Director, Geovic Mining Corporation

Ian Masterton-Hume (2)

 

64

Managing Director, Capstone Headwaters MB

Ian Masterton-Hume (2)

67

 

Corporate Director and Member, Sentient Business Council

Kevin R. Morano (2),(3)

 

6164

 

Managing Principal, KEM Capital LLC

Terry M. Palmer (1),(3)

 

7073

 

Principal, Marrs, Sevier & Company LLCRetired Certified Public Accountant

Andrew N. Pullar

 

4345

 

Chief Executive OfficerManaging Partner and Director, The Sentient GroupEquity Partners

David H. Watkins (1),(2)

 

7073

 

Chairman, AtnaDirector, Commander Resources Ltd., Euro Resources S.A.

 


Committee Membership

(1)  Audit

(2)  Compensation

(3)  Corporate Governance

(1)

Audit

(2)

Compensation

(3)

Corporate Governance and Nominating

 

Metals Market Overview

 

We are an emerging precious metals exploration company with silver and gold mining properties in Mexico and a large silver advanced exploration project in Argentina. Descriptions of the markets for these metals are provided below.

 

Silver Market

 

Silver has traditionally served as a medium of exchange, much like gold. Silver’s strength, malleability, ductility, thermal and electrical conductivity, sensitivity to light and ability to endure extreme changes in temperature combine to make it a widely used industrial metal. While silver continues to be used as a form of investment and a financial asset, the principal uses of silver are industrial, primarily in electrical and electronic components, photography, jewelry, silverware, batteries, computer chips, electrical contacts, and high technology printing. Silver’s anti-bacterial properties also make it valuable for use in medicine and in water purification. Additionally, the use of silver in the photovoltaic and solar panel

31


industries is growing rapidly, and new uses of silver are being developed in connection with the use of superconductive wire and radio frequency identification devices.

 

Most silver product is obtained from mining in which silver is not the principal or primary product. The Silver Institute, an international silver industry association, estimates in itsnoted that for 2014 World Silver Survey that only around 30%31% of output comescame from so-called primary silver mines, where silver is the main source of revenue.

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated on the London Fix high and low silver fixes in U.S. dollars per troy ounce. On February 25, 2015,27, 2018, the closing price of silver was $16.51$16.61 per troy ounce.

 

 

Silver

 

Year

 

High

 

Low

 

2009

 

$

19.18

 

$

10.51

 

2010

 

$

30.70

 

$

15.14

 

2011

 

$

48.70

 

$

26.16

 

2012

 

$

37.23

 

$

26.67

 

2013

 

$

32.23

 

$

18.61

 

2014

 

$

22.05

 

$

15.28

 

2015*

 

$

18.23

 

$

15.71

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Silver

 

Year

    

High

    

Low

 

2011

 

$

48.70

 

$

26.16

 

2012

 

$

37.23

 

$

26.67

 

2013

 

$

32.23

 

$

18.61

 

2014

 

$

22.05

 

$

15.28

 

2015

 

$

18.23

 

$

13.71

 

2016

 

$

20.71

 

$

13.58

 

2017

 

$

18.56

 

$

15.22

 

2018*

 

$

17.52

 

$

16.35

 


*Through February 25, 2015.27, 2018.

 

Gold Market

 

Gold has two main categories of use: fabrication and investment. Fabricated gold has a variety of end uses, including jewelry, electronics, dentistry, industrial and decorative uses, medals, medallions and official coins. Gold investors buy gold bullion, official coins and jewelry. The supply of gold consists of a combination of production from mining and the draw-down of existing stocks of gold held by governments, financial institutions, industrial organizations and private individuals.

 

24



The following table sets forth for the periods indicated on the London Fix AMPM high and low gold fixes in U.S. dollars per troy ounce. On February 25, 2015,27, 2018, the closing price of gold was $1,204.75$1,326 per troy ounce.

 

 

Gold

 

Year

 

High

 

Low

 

2009

 

$

1,218.25

 

$

813.00

 

2010

 

$

1,426.00

 

$

1,052.25

 

2011

 

$

1,896.50

 

$

1,316.00

 

2012

 

$

1,790.00

 

$

1,537.50

 

2013

 

$

1,693.75

 

$

1,192.00

 

2014

 

$

1,385.00

 

$

1,142.00

 

2015*

 

$

1,275.95

 

$

1,172.00

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gold

 

Year

    

High

    

Low

 

2011

 

$

1,895

 

$

1,319

 

2012

 

$

1,792

 

$

1,540

 

2013

 

$

1,694

 

$

1,192

 

2014

 

$

1,385

 

$

1,142

 

2015

 

$

1,296

 

$

1,049

 

2016

 

$

1,366

 

$

1,077

 

2017

 

$

1,346

 

$

1,151

 

2018*

 

$

1,355

 

$

1,311

 


*Through February 25, 2015.27, 2018.

 

Employees

 

We currently have approximately 293160 employees, including 9seven in Golden, approximately 250130 in Torreón, Mexico or at the Velardeña Properties 9(including approximately 70 assigned to the oxide plant which is leased to a third party), three in Argentina in connection with the El Quevar project, and approximately 2520 in various foreign exploration offices.

32


Competition

 

There is aggressive competition within the mining industry for the acquisition of a limited number of mineral resource opportunities, and many of the mining companies with which we compete have greater financial and technical resources than we do. Accordingly, these competitors may be able to spend greater amounts on acquisitions of mineral properties of merit, as well as on exploration and advancement of their mineral properties. We also compete with other mining companies for the acquisition and retention of skilled mining engineers, mine and processing plant operators and mechanics, geologists, geophysicists and other experienced technical personnel. Our competitive position depends upon our ability to successfully and economically advance new and existing silver and gold properties. Failure to achieve and maintain a competitive position could adversely impact our ability to obtain the financing necessary for us to advance our mineral properties.

 

Available Information

 

We make available, free of charge through our website at www.goldenminerals.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. Information on our website is not incorporated into this annual report on Form 10-K and is not a part of this report.  Additionally, the public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov.

ITEM 1A:RISK FACTORS

Investors in Golden Minerals should consider carefully, in addition to the other information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors:

We have historically incurred operating losses and operating cash flow deficits and we expect to incur operating losses and operating cash flow deficits through 2015; our potential profitability in the foreseeable future would depend on our ability to mine at our Velardeña Properties on a profitable basis and on our ability to generate sufficient revenue from other sources to fund our continuing activities.

We have a history of operating losses and we expect that we will continue to incur operating losses unless and until such time as our Velardeña Properties, our El Quevar project, or another of our exploration properties, including those recently acquired assets in the Parral District in Chihuahua Mexico, generates sufficient revenue to fund our continuing business activities. If we are successful at mining at the Velardeña Properties on a profitable basis, it is unlikely that those activities will generate sufficient revenue to fund all of our continuing business activities as currently conducted. In that case, operating losses would continue until we develop or acquire

25



 

Investors in Golden Minerals should consider carefully, in addition to the other information contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K, the following risk factors:

We have historically incurred operating losses and operating cash flow deficits and we expect to incur operating losses and operating cash flow deficits through 2018; our potential profitability in the foreseeable future would depend on our ability to identify, acquire and mine properties to generate sufficient revenues to fund our continuing activities.

       We have a history of operating losses and we expect that we will continue to incur operating losses unless and until such time as our Velardeña Properties, our El Quevar project, or another of our exploration properties, generates sufficient revenue to fund our continuing business activities. Although we have leased the oxide plant at the Velardeña Properties to a subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company, the cash that we expect will be generated from that lease may not be sufficient to fund all of our continuing business activities as currently conducted. In addition, the oxide plant lease may terminate sooner or produce less revenue than we anticipate. There is no assurance that we will develop additional sources of revenue.

sufficient additional sources of revenue. There is no assurance that we will develop additional sources or revenue.

In addition, the potential profitability of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties isany of our properties would be based on a number of assumptions. For example, profitability willwould depend on metal prices, costs of materials and supplies, costs at the mines and processing plants and the amounts and timing of expenditures, and assumptions relatedincluding expenditures to profitability at other than themaintain our Velardeña Properties, could include expenditures to maintain our El Quevar project and to continue exploration at other exploration properties, and potential strategic acquisitions or other transactions, in addition to other factors, many of which

33


Table of Contents

are and will be beyond our control. We cannot be certain we will be able to generate sufficient revenue from the Velardeña Properties or other sources,any source to achieve profitability and eliminate operating cash flow deficits, or to cease to require additional funding.

We may require additional external financing to fund our continuing business activities in the future.

As of December 31, 2014,

We may require additional external financing to fund our continuing business activities in the future

As of December 31, 2017, we had approximately $3.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. With anticipated costs during 2018, including exploration expenditures, care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties, exploration and evaluation expenditures and property holding costs at the El Quevar project, and general and administrative expenses, offset by anticipated revenue from the lease of the oxide plant, payment related to an exploration property farm out and payment related to an amendment of the farm-out agreement of the Celaya property to Electrum, we expect our current cash and cash equivalent balance will be approximately $1.5 million by the end of 2018. Even with these anticipated revenues throughout 2018, our cash balance in 2018 might not be sufficient to provide adequate cash reserves in the event of an unexpected termination of the Hecla lease, variations from anticipated care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties and costs for continued exploration, project assessment and development at our other exploration properties, requiring us to seek additional funding from equity or debt or from monetization of non-core assets.

        Other than our outstanding At-the-Market program (the “ATM Program”), which we launched in December 2016, and for which the amount of funds raised thereby is uncertain, we had approximately $8.6 million in cash and cash equivalents. With anticipated costs during 2015, we expect that our current cash and cash equivalent balance would be depleted to approximately $2.0 million by the end of 2015. Even with the restart of mining at the Velardeña Properties in July 2014, our cash balance for 2015 might not be sufficient to provide adequate cash reserves in the event of decreasing metals prices, unexpected costs in connection with optimization of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties or to pursue further exploration of our properties in Mexico, requiring us to seek additional funding from equity or debt or from monetization of non-core assets.

We do not have a credit, off-take or other commercial financing arrangement in place that would finance our general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities in the future, and we believe that securing credit for these purposes may be difficult given our limited history and the continuing volatility in global credit and commodity markets. In addition, commercial financing arrangements may not be available on favorable terms or on terms that would not further restrict our flexibility and ongoing ability to meet our cash requirements over a reasonable period of time. Access to public financing has been negatively impacted by the volatility in the credit markets and metals prices, which may affect our ability to obtain equity or debt financing in the future and, if obtained, to do so on favorable terms. We also may not be able to obtain funding by monetizing additional non-core exploration or other assets at an acceptable price. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain financing to fund our general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities in the future on favorable terms or at all.

Hecla may terminate the oxide plant lease.

       In July 2015 we entered into a leasing agreement with a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company to lease our Velardeña oxide plant for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. The lease agreement contained several lease extension options, which Hecla exercised, extending the lease through December 31, 2018. In August 2017, we granted Hecla an option pursuant to an option agreement to extend the lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020. Hecla must exercise this option to extend the lease no later than October 3, 2018. Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant and during the year ended December 31, 2017, Hecla's mining and processing activities resulted in a net margin of $4.5 million for the Company. Although we intend the oxide plant lease to extend through December 2018, and then through December 2020 assuming exercise of the option, the lease may terminate sooner than we anticipate if Hecla experiences mining problems or delays at its nearby mine, if there are disputes between Hecla and us, or for other reasons. Moreover, the lease payment from Hecla is based, in part, on the amount of ore processed at the plant, and we have no control over their production. There is also no assurance that Hecla will exercise the option to extend the lease for an additional two years through December 31, 2020.

One of our stockholders owns a significant percentage of our common stock and could block decisions or transactions that could be beneficial to other stockholders.

34


Table of Contents

       One of our stockholders, Sentient, owns approximately 45% of the Company's outstanding common stock. With this level of ownership, Sentient could exert significant control over the Company, including over the election of directors, changes in the size or the composition of the board of directors, and mergers and other business combinations involving the Company. Through greater control of the board of directors and increased voting power, including the potential to prevent a quorum at stockholders meetings, Sentient could control certain decisions, including decisions regarding qualification and appointment of officers, operations of the business including acquisition or disposition of our assets or purchases and sales of mining or exploration properties, dividend policy, and access to capital (including borrowing from third-party lenders and the issuance of equity or debt securities)  Sentient’s large share ownership will also make it difficult, if not impossible, for the Company to enter into a change of control transaction that may otherwise be beneficial for the Company’s other shareholders.

If we commence mining in Mexico, we will likely enter into a collective bargaining agreement with a union that, together with labor and employment regulations, could adversely affect our mining activities and financial condition.

As was the case at our Velardeña Properties, mine employees in Mexico are typically represented by a union, and our relationship with our employees was, and we expect in the future will be, governed by collective bargaining agreements. Any collective bargaining agreement that we enter into with a union is likely to restrict our mining flexibility in and impose additional costs on our mining activities. In addition, relations between us and our employees in Mexico may be affected by changes in regulations or labor union requirements regarding labor relations that may be introduced by the Mexican authorities or by labor unions. Changes in legislation or in the relationship between us and our employees may have a material adverse effect on our mining activities and financial condition.

We may not mine the Velardeña Properties again.

In mid-November 2015, we shut down the mines and sulfide processing plant at our Velardeña Properties and placed them on care and maintenance.  Commencing mining again is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including:

·

whether we are able to create mine plans or gold recovery improvements that can achieve sustainable cash positive results at current and future metals prices;

·

unexpected events, including difficulties in maintaining the properties on a care and maintenance basis, potential sabotage or damage to the assets related to the suspension of mining, and variations in ore grade and relative amounts, grades and metallurgical characteristics of oxide and sulfide ores;

·

continued decreases or insufficient increases in gold and silver prices to permit us to achieve sustainable cash positive results;

·

actual holding and care and maintenance costs resulting from the shutdown exceeding current estimates or including unanticipated costs;

·

loss of and inability to adequately replace skilled mining and management personnel;

·

strikes or other labor problems; and

·

our ability to obtain additional funding for general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities in the future,as currently conducted and we believe that securing creditpossibly for these purposes may be difficult given our limited history and the continuing volatility in global credit and commodity markets. In addition, commercial financing arrangements may not be available on favorable terms or on terms that would not further restrict our flexibility and ongoing ability to meet our cash requirements over a reasonable period of time. Access to public financing has been negatively impacted by the volatility in the credit markets and metals prices, which may affect our ability to obtain equity or debt financing in the future and, if obtained, to do so on favorable terms. We also may not be able to obtain funding by monetizing additional non-core exploration or other assets at an acceptable price. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain financing to fund our general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities in the future on favorable terms or at all.

Since we have recommenced mining at our Velardeña Properties, we are likely to enter into a collective bargaining agreement with a union in the future and we will remain subject to Mexican labor and employment regulations, which may adversely affect our mining activities and financial condition.

Prior to the suspensionpotential restart of our Velardeña Properties in June 2013, our employees in Mexico were represented by a union, and our relationship with our employees was governed by collective bargaining agreements. Upon recommencement of mining at our Velardeña Properties, our mining activities are not subject to collective bargaining agreements. However, we currently have an agreement with the union that allows us to mine without a full scale collective bargaining agreement, which we will likely have to enter into in the future. Any collective bargaining agreement that we enter into with the union may restrict our mining flexibility in and impose additional costs on our mining activities. In addition, relations between us and our employees in Mexico may be affected by changes in regulations or labor union requirements regarding labor relations that may be introduced by the Mexican authorities or by labor unions. Changes in legislation or in the relationship between us and our employees may have a material adverse effect on our mining activities and financial condition.Properties.

35


Table of Contents

Based on these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that we will restart mining activities at the Velardeña Properties.

Our ability to successfully conduct mining and processing activities at our Velardeña Properties and potentially obtainresulting in long-term cash flow and profitability from our Velardeña Properties or other properties in the future will be affected by changes in prices of silver, gold and other metals.

 

Our ability to successfully conduct mining and processing activities in Mexico, Argentina or other countries, to establish reserves and advance our exploration properties, and to become profitable in the future, as well as our long-term viability, depend, in large part, on the market prices of silver, gold, zinc, copper and other metals. The market prices for these metals are volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including:

Our ability to successfully conduct mining and processing activities at our Velardeña Properties, to establish reserves and advance our exploration properties, and to become profitable in the future, as well as our long-term viability, depend, in large part, on the market prices of silver, gold, zinc, lead, copper and other metals. The market prices for these metals are volatile and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control, including:

·

·

global or regional consumption patterns;

·

supply of, and demand for, silver, gold, zinc, lead, copper and other metals;

·

speculative activities and hedging activities;

26·



·expectations for inflation;

·

political and economic conditions; and

·

supply of, and demand for, consumables required for extraction and processing of metals.

The declines in silver and gold prices in 2013, 2014 and 2015 have had a significant impact on our mining activities, resulting in shutdowns in 2013 and 2015 of mining at our Velardeña Properties, and negatively affect mining opportunities at our other properties. Additionally, future weakness in the global economy could increase volatility in metals prices or depress metals prices, which could also affect our mining and processing plans at our Velardeña Properties or make it uneconomic for us to engage in mining or exploration activities. Volatility or sustained price declines may also adversely affect our ability to build or continue our business.

The declines in silver and gold prices in 2013 and 2014 had a significant impact on our mining activities and a similar decline in these prices in the future could negatively affect mining activities at the Velardeña Properties. Additionally, future weakness in the global economy could increase volatility in metals prices or depress metals prices, which could also affect our mining and processing plans at our Velardeña Properties or make it uneconomic for us to engage in mining or exploration activities. Volatility or sustained price declines may also adversely affect our ability to build or continue our business.

ProductsIf products are processed from our Velardeña Properties or other mines in the future, they could contain higher than expected contaminates,contaminants, thereby negatively impacting our financial condition.

In 2015 we processed mined material to make gold and silver bearing lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. Concentrate treatment charges paid to smelters and refineries include penalties for certain elements, including arsenic and antimony that exceed contract limits. In the future, if we process material from our Velardeña Properties or other mines, any such concentrates could include higher than expected contaminants, which would result in higher treatment expenses and penalty charges that could increase our costs and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. This could occur due to unexpected variations in the occurrence of these elements in the material mined, problems that occur during blending of material from various locations in the mine prior to processing and other unanticipated events.

Our mining plan calls for the processing of mined material to make gold and silver bearing lead, zinc and pyrite concentrates. In 2014 we processed mined material to make gold and silver bearing lead and zinc concentrates, and in 2015 we expect to also make saleable pyrite concentrates. Concentrate treatment charges paid to smelters and refineries include penalties for certain elements, including arsenic and antimony that exceed contract limits. It is possible that our concentrates will contain higher amounts of these elements than we anticipate.  This can occur due to unexpected variations in the occurrence of these elements in the material mined, problems that occur during blending of material from various locations in the mine prior to processing and other unanticipated events. If our concentrates include higher than expected contaminants, we would incur higher treatment expenses and penalty charges, which could increase our costs and negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As a result of our business combination with ECU, we have assumed all historical ECU liabilities, some of which are known or which may become known by Golden Minerals.

In September 2011, we completed a business combination with ECU (the “Transaction”), which at that time owned the Velardeña Properties. As a result of the Transaction, we are now subject to the environmental, contractual, tax and other obligations and liabilities of ECU, some of which may be unknown. For example, we received notices from Mexican tax authorities regarding approximately $1.4 million in social security taxes alleged to be due for previous years, which have been paid by us but which we have challenged for refund. There can be no assurance that we are aware of all obligations and liabilities related to the historical business of ECU. These liabilities, and other liabilities related to ECU’s business not currently known to us or that prove to be more significant than we currently anticipate, could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar project and our other properties may not contain mineral reserves.

We are considered an exploration stage company under SEC Industry Guide 7, and none of the properties at our Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar project, or any of our other properties have been shown to contain proven or probable mineral reserves. Expenditures made in mining at the Velardeña Properties or the exploration and advancement of our El Quevar project or other properties may not result in positive cash flow or in discoveries of commercially recoverable quantities of ore. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable ore deposits, and we cannot assure you that any mineral deposit we identify will qualify as an orebody that can be legally and economically exploited or that any particular level of recovery from discovered mineralization will in fact be realized.

36


Table of Contents

Tetra Tech completed technical reports on our Velardeña Properties and our Santa Maria and Rodeo properties, which indicated the presence of mineralized material.  During 2012, we released an estimate of mineralized material at our El Quevar project and in 2017 Wood Group undertook an analysis and re-modeling of the data utilized in the prior mineralized material estimate. Mineralized material figures based on estimates made by geologists are inherently imprecise and depend on geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling that may prove to be unreliable or inaccurate. We cannot assure you that these estimates are accurate or that proven and probable mineral reserves will be identified at the Velardeña Properties, the Santa Maria and Rodeo properties, the El Quevar project or any of our other properties. Even if the presence of reserves is established at a project, the economic viability of the project may not justify exploitation. We have spent significant amounts on the evaluation of El Quevar prior to establishing the economic viability of that project.

Estimates of reserves, mineral deposits and mining costs also can be affected by factors such as governmental regulations and requirements, fluctuations in metals prices or costs of essential materials or supplies, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties and unusual or unexpected geological formations. In addition, the grades of ore or material ultimately mined may differ from that indicated by drilling results, sampling, feasibility studies or technical reports. Short-term factors relating to reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies or the processing of new or different grades, may also have an adverse effect on mining and on the results of operations. Silver, gold or other minerals recovered in small-scale laboratory tests may not be duplicated in large-scale tests under on-site processing conditions.

We are considered an exploration stage company under SEC Industry Guide 7, and none of the properties at our Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar project, or any of our other properties have been shown to contain proven or probable mineral reserves. Expenditures made in mining at the Velardeña Properties or the exploration and advancement of our El Quevar project or other properties may not result in positive cash flow or in discoveries of commercially recoverable quantities of ore. Most exploration projects do not result in the discovery of commercially mineable ore deposits, and we cannot assure you that any mineral deposit we identify will qualify as an orebody that can be legally and economically exploited or that any particular level of recovery from discovered mineralization will in fact be realized.

Tetra Tech completed a technical report on our Velardeña Properties, which indicated the presence of mineralized material, and RungePincockMinarco completed a technical report on our El Quevar property, which indicated the presence of mineralized material. Mineralized material figures based on estimates made by geologists are inherently imprecise and depend on geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling that may prove to be unreliable or inaccurate. We cannot assure you that these estimates are accurate or that proven and probable mineral reserves will be identified at the Velardeña Properties, El Quevar or any of our other properties. Even if the presence of reserves is established at a project, the economic viability of the project may not justify exploitation. We have spent significant amounts on the evaluation of El Quevar prior to establishing the economic viability of that project.

Estimates of reserves, mineral deposits and mining costs also can be affected by factors such as governmental regulations and requirements, fluctuations in metals prices or costs of essential materials or supplies, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties and unusual or unexpected geological formations. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined may differ from that indicated by drilling results, sampling, feasibility studies or technical reports. Short-term factors relating to reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies or the processing of new or different grades, may also have an adverse effect on mining and on the results of operations. Silver, gold or other minerals recovered in small-scale laboratory tests may not be duplicated in large-scale tests under on-site processing conditions.

The Velardeña Properties, the El Quevar project and our other properties are subject to foreign environmental laws and regulations which could materially adversely affect our business.

We have conducted mining activities in Mexico and conduct mineral exploration activities primarily in Mexico. Mexico and Argentina, where the El Quevar project is located, have laws and regulations that control the exploration and mining of mineral properties and their effects on the environment, including air and water quality, mine reclamation, waste generation, handling and disposal, the protection of different species of flora and fauna and the preservation of lands. These laws and regulations require us to acquire permits and other authorizations for conducting certain activities. In many countries, there is relatively new comprehensive environmental legislation, and the permitting and authorization process may not be established or predictable. We may not be able to acquire necessary permits or authorizations on a timely basis, if at all. Delays in acquiring any permit or authorization could increase the cost of our projects and could suspend or delay the commencement of extraction and processing of mineralized material.

Our Velardeña Properties are subject to regulation by SEMARNAT, the environmental protection agency of Mexico. In order to permit new facilities at or expand existing facilities, regulations require that an environmental impact statement, known in Mexico as a Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental (the “Manifestación”), be prepared by a third-party contractor for submission to SEMARNAT. Studies required to support the Manifestación include a detailed analysis of soil, water, vegetation, wildlife, cultural resources and socio-economic impacts. The Manifestación is then published on SEMARNAT’s web page and in its official gazette in a national and local newspaper. The Manifestación is discussed at various open hearings, including hearings in the local communities, at which third parties may voice their views. We would be required to provide proof of local community support of the Manifestación as a condition to final approval. We may not be able to obtain community support of future projects.

Environmental legislation in Mexico is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. For example, in January 2011, Article 180 of the Mexican Federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection was amended. Among other things, this amendment extended the term during which an individual or entity having a legitimate interest may contest administrative acts, including environmental authorizations, permits or concessions granted, without the need to demonstrate the actual existence of harm to the environment, natural resources, flora, fauna or human health, making it sufficient to argue that harm may be caused. Further, the amendment permits the contesting party to

37


Table of Contents

challenge a Manifestación through a variety of administrative or court procedures. As a result of the amendment, more legal actions supported or sponsored by non-governmental groups interested in halting projects may be filed against companies operating in all industrial sectors, including the mining sector. Mexican operations are also subject to the environmental agreements entered into by Mexico, the United States and Canada in connection with the North American Free Trade Agreement. Further, in August 2011, certain amendments to the Civil Federal Procedures Code of Mexico (“CFPC”) were published in the Official Daily of the Federation. The amendments establish three categories of collective actions by which 30 or more people claiming injury resulting from, among other things, environmental harm, will be deemed to have a sufficient and legitimate interest in seeking, through a civil procedure, restitution, economic compensation or suspension of the activities from which the alleged injury derived. These amendments to the CFPC may result in more litigation by plaintiffs seeking remedies for alleged environmental harms, including suspension of the activities alleged to cause harm. Future changes in environmental regulation in the jurisdictions where the Velardeña Properties are located may adversely affect our business, make our business prohibitively expensive, or prohibit it altogether.

Environmental legislation in many other countries, in addition to Mexico, is evolving in a manner that will likely require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. We cannot predict what environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted or adopted in the future or how future laws and regulations will be administered or interpreted. For example, in September 2010, the Argentine National Congress passed legislation which prohibits mining activity in glacial and surrounding areas. Although we do not currently anticipate that this legislation will impact the El Quevar project, the legislation provides an example of the evolving environmental legislation in the areas in which we operate. Compliance with more stringent laws and regulations, as well as potentially more vigorous enforcement policies or regulatory agencies or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may (i) necessitate significant capital outlays, (ii) cause us to delay, terminate or otherwise change our intended activities with respect to one or more projects, or (iii) materially adversely affect our future exploration activities. 

The Velardeña Properties and many of our exploration properties are located in historic mining districts where prior owners, including ECU in the case of the Velardeña Properties, may have caused environmental damage that may not be known to us or to the regulators. At the Velardeña Properties and in most other cases, we have not sought complete environmental analyses of our mineral properties. We have not conducted comprehensive reviews of the environmental laws and regulations in every jurisdiction in which we own or control mineral properties. Insurance fully covering many environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and mining) is not generally available. To the extent environmental hazards may exist on the properties in which we currently hold interests, or may hold interests in the future, that are unknown to us at present and that have been caused by us, or previous owners or operators, or that may have occurred naturally, and to the extent we are subject to environmental requirements or liabilities, the cost of compliance with these requirements and satisfaction of these liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If we are unable to fully fund the cost of remediation of any environmental condition, we may be required to suspend activities or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remediation.

In addition, U.S. or international legislative or regulatory action to address concerns about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions could negatively impact our business.

We conduct mining activities in Mexico and mineral exploration activities primarily in Argentina and Mexico. These countries have laws and regulations that control the exploration and mining of mineral properties and their effects on the environment, including air and water quality, mine reclamation, waste generation, handling and disposal, the protection of different species of flora and fauna and the preservation of lands. These laws and regulations require us to acquire permits and other authorizations for conducting certain activities. In many countries, there is relatively new comprehensive environmental legislation, and the permitting and authorization process may not be established or predictable. We may not be able to acquire necessary permits or authorizations on

27



a timely basis, if at all. Delays in acquiring any permit or authorization could increase the cost of our projects and could suspend or delay the commencement of extraction and processing of mineralized material.

Our Velardeña Properties are subject to regulation by SEMARNAT, the environmental protection agency of Mexico. In order to permit new facilities at or expand existing facilities, regulations require that an environmental impact statement, known in Mexico as a Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental, be prepared by a third-party contractor for submission to SEMARNAT. Studies required to support the Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental include a detailed analysis of soil, water, vegetation, wildlife, cultural resources and socio-economic impacts. The Manifestación is then published on SEMARNAT’s web page and in its official gazette in a national and local newspaper. The Manifestación is discussed at various open hearings, including hearings in the local communities, at which third parties may voice their views. We would be required to provide proof of local community support of the Manifestación as a condition to final approval.

Environmental legislation in Mexico is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. For example, in January 2011, Article 180 of the Mexican Federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection was amended. Among other things, this amendment extended the term during which an individual or entity having a legitimate interest may contest administrative acts, including environmental authorizations, permits or concessions granted, without the need to demonstrate the actual existence of harm to the environment, natural resources, flora, fauna or human health, making it sufficient to argue that harm may be caused. Further, the amendment permits the contesting party to challenge a Manifestación de Impacto Ambiental through a variety of administrative or court procedures. As a result of the amendment, more legal actions supported or sponsored by non-governmental groups interested in halting projects may be filed against companies operating in all industrial sectors, including the mining sector. Mexican operations are also subject to the environmental agreements entered into by Mexico, the United States and Canada in connection with the North American Free Trade Agreement. Further, in August 2011, certain amendments to the Civil Federal Procedures Code of Mexico (“CFPC”) were published in the Official Daily of the Federation. The amendments establish three categories of collective actions by which 30 or more people claiming injury resulting from, among other things, environmental harm, will be deemed to have a sufficient and legitimate interest in seeking, through a civil procedure, restitution, economic compensation or suspension of the activities from which the alleged injury derived. These amendments to the CFPC may result in more litigation by plaintiffs seeking remedies for alleged environmental harms, including suspension of the activities alleged to cause harm. Future changes in environmental regulation in the jurisdictions where the Velardeña Properties are located may adversely affect our business, make our business prohibitively expensive, or prohibit it altogether.

Environmental legislation in many other countries, in addition to Mexico, is evolving in a manner that will likely require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. We cannot predict what environmental legislation or regulations will be enacted or adopted in the future or how future laws and regulations will be administered or interpreted. For example, in September 2010, the Argentine National Congress passed legislation which prohibits mining activity in glacial and surrounding areas. Although we do not currently anticipate that this legislation will impact the El Quevar project, the legislation provides an example of the evolving environmental legislation in the areas in which we operate. Compliance with more stringent laws and regulations, as well as potentially more vigorous enforcement policies or regulatory agencies or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may (i) necessitate significant capital outlays, (ii) cause us to delay, terminate or otherwise change our intended activities with respect to one or more projects, or (iii) materially adversely affect our future exploration activities.

The Velardeña Properties and many of our exploration properties are located in historic mining districts where prior owners, including ECU in the case of the Velardeña Properties, may have caused environmental damage that may not be known to us or to the regulators. At the Velardeña Properties and in most other cases, we have not sought complete environmental analyses of our mineral properties. We have not conducted comprehensive reviews of the environmental laws and regulations in every jurisdiction in which we own or control mineral properties. Insurance fully covering many environmental risks (including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of disposal of waste products occurring from exploration and mining) is not generally available. To the extent environmental hazards may exist on the properties in which we currently hold interests, or may hold interests in the future, that are unknown to us at present and that have been caused by us, or previous owners or operators, or that may have occurred naturally, and to the extent we are subject to environmental requirements or liabilities, the cost of compliance with these requirements and satisfaction of these liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. If we are unable to fully fund the cost of remediation of any environmental condition, we may be required to suspend activities or enter into interim compliance measures pending completion of the required remediation.

In addition, U.S. or international legislative or regulatory action to address concerns about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions could negatively impact our business.

28



Title to the Velardeña Properties and our other properties and rights may be defective or may be challenged.

Our policy is to seek to confirm the validity of our rights to, title to, or contract rights with respect to, each mineral property in which we have a material interest. However, we cannot guarantee that title to our properties will not be challenged. Title insurance is not available for our mineral properties, and our ability to ensure that we have obtained secure rights to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. Accordingly, the Velardeña Properties and our other mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims,

38


Table of Contents

and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. In addition, we may be unable to conduct activities on our properties as permitted or to enforce our rights with respect to our properties, and the title to our mineral properties may also be impacted by state action. We have not conducted surveys of all of the exploration properties in which we hold direct or indirect interests and, therefore, the precise area and location of these exploration properties may be in doubt.

        In most of the countries in which we operate, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements, or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners. Any such loss, reduction or imposition of partners could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Under the laws of Mexico, mineral resources belong to the state, and government concessions are required to explore for or exploit mineral reserves. Mineral rights derive from concessions granted, on a discretionary basis, by the Ministry of Economy, pursuant to the Mexican mining law and regulations thereunder. We hold title to the Velardeña Properties and our other properties in Mexico through these government concessions, but there is no assurance that title to the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties and other properties will not be challenged or impaired. The Velardeña Properties and other properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, interests or native land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects. There could be valid challenges to the title of any of the claims comprising the Velardeña Properties that, if successful, could impair mining with respect to such properties in the future. A defect could result in our losing all or a portion of our right, title, and interest in and to the properties to which the title defect relates.

Our Velardeña Properties mining concessions and our other mining concessions in Mexico may be terminated if our obligations to maintain the concessions in good standing are not satisfied, including obligations to explore or exploit the relevant concession, to pay any relevant fees, to comply with all environmental and safety standards, to provide information to the Ministry of Economy and to allow inspections by the Ministry of Economy. In addition to termination, failure to make timely concession maintenance payments and otherwise comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in reduction or expropriation of entitlements. Additionally, in 2014, new mining concessions became subject to additional review and approval by the Mexico Ministry of Energy.

Mining concessions in Mexico give exclusive exploration and exploitation rights to the minerals located in the concessions but do not include surface rights to the real property, which requires that we negotiate the necessary agreements with surface landowners. Many of our mining properties are subject to the Mexican ejido system requiring us to contract with the local communities surrounding the properties in order to obtain surface rights to land needed in connection with our mining exploration activities. In connection with our Velardeña Properties, we have contracts with two ejidos to secure surface rights with a total annual cost of approximately $25,000. The first contract is a ten-year contract with the Velardeña ejido, which provides surface rights to certain roads and other infrastructure at the Velardeña Properties through 2021. The second contract is a 25-year contract with the Vista Hermosa ejido signed in March 2013, which provides exploration access and access rights for roads and utilities for our Velardeña Properties. Our inability to maintain and periodically renew or expand these surface rights on favorable terms or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Mining and processing activities are dependent on the availability of sufficient water supplies to support our mining activities.

Mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties, as at most mines, requires significant amounts of water. At the Velardeña Properties, our ability to have sufficient water is dependent on our ability to maintain our water rights and claims. Water is provided for all of the mines comprising our Velardeña Properties by wells located in the valley adjacent to the Velardeña Properties. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration

39


Table of Contents

to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are currently only using water from the three wells associated with the oxide plant. We are required to make annual payments to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to these wells. We are required to pay a fine to the Mexican Government each year if we use too much water from a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well. In addition to these fines, the Mexican Government reserves the right to cancel our title to the wells for abuse of these rules.

We currently have a sufficient amount of water for the third-party processing activities at the oxide plant. However, if we began processing material from both the sulfide and oxide plants in the future, we may face shortages in our water supply, and therefore will need to obtain water from outside sources at higher costs. The loss of some or all water rights for any of our wells, in whole or in part, or shortages of water to which we have rights would require us to seek water from outside sources at higher costs and could require us to curtail or shut down mining and processing in the future. Laws and regulations may be introduced in the future which could limit our access to sufficient water resources in mining activities, thus adversely affecting our business.

Our policy is to seek to confirm the validity of our rights to, title to, or contract rights with respect to, each mineral property in which we have a material interest. However, we cannot guarantee that title to our properties will not be challenged. Title insurance is not available for our mineral properties, and our ability to ensure that we have obtained secure rights to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. Accordingly, the Velardeña Properties and our other mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims, and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. In addition, we may be unable to conduct activities on our properties as permitted or to enforce our rights with respect to our properties, and the title to our mineral properties may also be impacted by state action. We have not conducted surveys of all of the exploration properties in which we hold direct or indirect interests and, therefore, the precise area and location of these exploration properties may be in doubt.

In most of the countries in which we operate, failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in loss, reduction or expropriation of entitlements, or the imposition of additional local or foreign parties as joint venture partners. Any such loss, reduction or imposition of partners could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Under the laws of Mexico, mineral resources belong to the state, and government concessions are required to explore for or exploit mineral reserves. Mineral rights derive from concessions granted, on a discretionary basis, by the Ministry of Economy, pursuant to the Mexican mining law and regulations thereunder. We hold title to the Velardeña Properties and our other properties in Mexico through these government concessions, but there is no assurance that title to the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties and other properties will not be challenged or impaired. The Velardeña Properties and other properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, interests or native land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects. There would be valid challenges to the title of any of the claims comprising the Velardeña Properties that, if successful, could impair mining with respect to such properties in the future. A defect could result in our losing all or a portion of our right, title, and interest in and to the properties to which the title defect relates.

Our Velardeña Properties mining concessions and our other mining concessions in Mexico may be terminated if our obligations to maintain the concessions in good standing are not satisfied, including obligations to explore or exploit the relevant concession, to pay any relevant fees, to comply with all environmental and safety standards, to provide information to the Ministry of Economy and to allow inspections by the Ministry of Economy. In addition to termination, failure to make timely concession maintenance payments and otherwise comply strictly with applicable laws, regulations and local practices relating to mineral right applications and tenure could result in reduction or expropriation of entitlements. Additionally, effective in 2014, new mining concessions are now subject to additional review and approval by the Mexico Ministry of Energy.

Mining concessions in Mexico give exclusive exploration and exploitation rights to the minerals located in the concessions but do not include surface rights to the real property, which requires that we negotiate the necessary agreements with surface landowners. Many of our mining properties are subject to the Mexican ejido system requiring us to contract with the local communities surrounding the properties in order to obtain surface rights to land needed in connection with our mining exploration activities. In connection with our Velardeña Properties, we have contracts with two ejidos to secure surface rights with a total annual cost of approximately $35,000. The first contract is a ten-year contract with the Velardeña ejido, which provides surface rights to certain roads and other infrastructure at the Velardeña Properties through 2021. The second contract is a 25-year contract with the Vista Hermosa ejido signed in March 2013, which provides exploration access and access rights for roads and utilities for our Velardeña Properties. Our inability to maintain and periodically renew or expand these surface rights on favorable terms or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Continuation of our mining and processing activities at our Velardeña Properties is dependent on the availability of sufficient water supplies to support our mining activities.

We require significant quantities of water for mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties. Continuous mining and processing is dependent on our ability to maintain our water rights and claims. Water is provided for all of the mines comprising our Velardeña Properties by wells located in the valley adjacent to the Velardeña Properties. We hold title to three wells located near the sulfide plant and hold certificates of registration to three wells located near the oxide plant. We are licensed to pump water from all six wells up to a permitted amount. We are currently only using water from two wells near the sulfide plant and one well near the oxide plant. We are required to make annual payments to the Mexican government to maintain our rights to these wells. In 2014 we made such payments totaling approximately $28,000 and expect to pay approximately the same amount in 2015. We are required to pay a fine to the Mexican Government each year if we use too much water from a particular well or alternatively if we do not use a minimum amount of water from a particular well. In addition to these fines, the Mexican Government reserves the right to cancel our

29



title to the wells for abuse of these rules. During 2014 we paid fines of approximately $20,800 for our overuse of one well and approximately $3,000 for our underuse of another well.

Under our current mining plan, in the near term, we will likely need additional water to run the sulfide plant, which we can truck from the two unused wells near the oxide plant or obtain from outside sources, both of which will increase our water costs. To avoid these higher water costs, we plan to construct a pipeline to enable us to pull water from the unused wells near the oxide plant. We are waiting on certain environmental permitting and expect to have this pipeline complete by the end of 2015. If we cannot complete this pipeline at all or in a timely manner, we will likely incur higher overall mining and processing costs as a result of paying higher water costs to truck water from the two unused wells near the oxide plant or from outside sources to run the sulfide plant. Additionally, once we begin processing material from both the sulfide and oxide plants, we may face shortages in our water supply, and therefore will need to obtain water from outside sources at higher costs. The loss of some or all water rights for any of our wells, in whole or in part, or shortages of water to which we have rights would require us to seek water from outside sources at higher costs and could require us to curtail or shut down mining and processing. Laws and regulations may be introduced in the future which could limit our access to sufficient water resources in mining activities, thus adversely affecting our business.

There are significant hazards involved in underground mining and processing activities at our Velardeña Properties, not all of which are fully covered by insurance. To the extent we must pay the costs associated with such risks, our business may be negatively affected.

The mining and processing of the underground mines at our Velardeña Properties, as well as the conduct of our exploration programs that frequently require rehabilitation of and drilling in underground mine workings, are subject to numerous risks and hazards, including, but not limited to, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, encountering unusual or unexpected geological formations, formation pressures, cave-ins, underground fires or floods, power outages, labor disruptions, seismic activity, rock bursts, accidents relating to historical workings, landslides and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions. These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or processing facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, reduced extraction and processing and delays in mining, asset write-downs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although we maintain insurance against risks inherent in the conduct of our business in amounts that we consider reasonable, this insurance contains, as in the case of our Velardeña Properties, exclusions and limitations on coverage, and will not cover all potential risks associated with mining and exploration activities, and related liabilities might exceed policy limits. As a result of any or all of the forgoing, particularly if the facilities are older, we could incur significant liabilities and costs that could adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition.

Our Velardeña Properties and most of our exploration programs, are subject to numerous risks and hazards, including, but not limited to, environmental hazards, industrial accidents, encountering unusual or unexpected geological formations, formation pressures, cave-ins, underground fires or floods, power outages, labor disruptions, seismic activity, rock bursts, accidents relating to historical workings, landslides and periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions. These occurrences could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties or processing facilities, personal injury or death, environmental damage, reduced extraction and processing and delays in mining, asset write-downs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. Although we maintain insurance against risks inherent in the conduct of our business in amounts that we consider reasonable, this insurance contains, as in the case of our Velardeña Properties, exclusions and limitations on coverage, and will not cover all potential risks associated with mining and exploration activities, and related liabilities might exceed policy limits. As a result of any or all of the forgoing, particularly if the facilities are older, we could incur significant liabilities and costs that could adversely affect our results of operation and financial condition.

Our Velardeña Properties are located in Mexico and are subject to various levels of political, economic, legal and other risks.

Our Velardeña Properties are located in Mexico, and, as such, are exposed to various levels of political, economic, legal and other risks and uncertainties, including local acts of violence, such as violence from drug cartels; military repression; extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates; high rates of inflation; labor unrest; the risks of war or civil unrest; expropriation and nationalization; renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts; illegal mining; acts of political corruption; changes in taxation policies; restrictions on foreign exchange and repatriation; and changing political conditions, currency controls and governmental regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction.

Our Velardeña Properties are located in Mexico, and, as such, are exposed to various levels of political, economic, legal and other risks and uncertainties, including local acts of violence, such as violence from drug cartels; military repression; extreme fluctuations in currency exchange rates; high rates of inflation; labor unrest; the risks of war or civil unrest; expropriation and nationalization; renegotiation or nullification of existing concessions, licenses, permits and contracts; illegal mining; acts of political corruption; changes in taxation policies; restrictions on foreign exchange and repatriation; and changing political conditions (including potential instability if the United States withdraws from or renegotiates the North American Free Trade Agreement), currency controls and governmental regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local contractors or require foreign contractors to employ citizens of, or purchase supplies from, a particular jurisdiction. Furthermore, given the uncertainties surrounding the policies of the new US Administration, the political relationship between the United States and Mexico may deteriorate, creating further political risk of doing business in Mexico.

40


Table of Contents

In the past, Mexico has been subject to political instability, changes and uncertainties, which have resulted in changes to existing governmental regulations affecting mineral exploration and mining activities. Mexico’s status as a developing country may make it more difficult for us to obtain any required funding for our Velardeña Properties or other projects in Mexico in the future.

Our Mexican properties are subject to a variety of governmental regulations governing health and worker safety, employment standards, waste disposal, protection of historic and archaeological sites, mine development, protection of endangered and protected species, purchase, storage and use of explosives and other matters. Specifically, our activities related to the Velardeña Properties are subject to regulation by SEMARNAT, the Comision Nacional del Agua, which regulates water rights, and Mexican mining laws. Mexican regulators have broad authority to shut down and levy fines against facilities that do not comply with regulations or standards.

Our Velardeña Properties and mineral exploration activities in Mexico may be adversely affected in varying degrees by changing government regulations relating to the mining industry or shifts in political conditions that increase the costs related to our mining and exploration activities or the maintenance of our properties. For example, effective January 2014, amendments to the Mexico federal corporate income tax law impose additional duties on mining concession holders, which will have a significant impact on the annual costs to maintain the concessions comprising the Velardeña Properties and our other Mexico exploration properties.

30



Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies, changes or increases in the legal rights of indigenous populations or in the difficulty or expense of obtaining rights from them that are necessary for our Velardeña Properties or shifts in political attitude may adversely affect our business and financial condition. Our mining and exploration activities may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on extraction, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income and other taxes, expropriation of property, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties continue to be subject to the need to assure the availability of adequate supplies of water and power, which could be affected by government policy and competing businesses in the area. The occurrence of these various factors and uncertainties cannot be accurately predicted and could have an adverse effect on our mining and exploration activities and financial condition.

Future changes in applicable laws and regulations or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could negatively impact current or planned exploration or mining activities at our Velardeña Properties or in respect of any of our other projects in Mexico or with which we become involved in Mexico. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, even if inadvertent, could result in the interruption of mining and exploration or material fines, penalties or other liabilities.

Results from our Velardeña Properties or other projects in Mexico in the future.

Our Mexican properties are subject to a variety of governmental regulations governing health and worker safety, employment standards, waste disposal, protection of historic and archaeological sites, mine development, protection of endangered and protected species, purchase, storage and use of explosives and other matters. Specifically, our activities related to the Velardeña Properties are subject to regulation by SEMARNAT, the Comisión Nacional del Agua, which regulates water rights, and Mexican mining laws. Mexican regulators have broad authority to shut down and levy fines against facilities that do not comply with regulations or standards.

Our Velardeña Properties and mineral exploration activities in Mexico may be adversely affected in varying degrees by changing government regulations relating to the mining industry or shifts in political conditions that increase the costs related to our mining and exploration activities or the maintenance of our properties. For example, in January 2014, amendments to the Mexico federal corporate income tax law require titleholders of mining concessions to pay annually a 7.5% duty of their mining related profits and a 0.5% duty on revenues obtained from the sale of gold, silver and platinum that were effective March 2015. These additional duties applicable to Mexico mining concession titleholders will have a significant impact on the annual costs applicable to the Velardeña Properties if we have mining related profits or significant revenues in the future.

Changes, if any, in mining or investment policies, changes or increases in the legal rights of indigenous populations or in the difficulty or expense of obtaining rights from them that are necessary for our Velardeña Properties or shifts in political attitude may adversely affect our business and financial condition. Our mining and exploration activities may be affected in varying degrees by government regulations with respect to restrictions on extraction, price controls, export controls, currency remittance, income and other taxes, expropriation of property, foreign investment, maintenance of claims, environmental legislation, land use, land claims of local people, water use and mine safety. Restart of mining or use of both the oxide and sulfide plant may also require us to assure the availability of adequate supplies of water and power, which could be affected by government policy and competing businesses in the area. The occurrence of these various factors and uncertainties cannot be accurately predicted and could have an adverse effect on our mining and exploration activities and financial condition.

Future changes in applicable laws and regulations or changes in their enforcement or regulatory interpretation could negatively impact current or planned exploration or mining activities at our Velardeña Properties or in respect of any of our other projects in Mexico or with which we become involved in Mexico. Any failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations, even if inadvertent, could result in the interruption of mining and exploration or material fines, penalties or other liabilities.

Most of our costs are subject to exchange control policies, the effects of inflation and currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and the Mexican peso.

Our revenue and external funding are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. However, mining, processing, maintenance and exploration costs at the Velardeña Properties and most of our exploration properties are denominated principally in Mexican pesos. These costs principally include electricity, labor, water, maintenance, local contractors and fuel. When inflation in Mexico increases without a corresponding devaluation of the Mexican peso, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. The annual average inflation rate in Mexico was 6.0% in 2017, 2.8% in 2016 and 2.7% in 2015. At the same time, the peso has been subject to significant fluctuation, which may not have been proportionate to the inflation rate and may not be proportionate to the inflation rate in the future. The value of the peso increased by 5.0% in 2017, decreased by 19% in 2016 and decreased by 17% in 2015. In addition, fluctuations

41


in currency exchange rates may have a significant impact on our financial results. There can be no assurance that the Mexican government will maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso's value will not fluctuate significantly in the future. We cannot assure you that currency fluctuations, inflation and exchange control policies will not have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, earnings and cash flows.

Our revenues are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. However, operating costs of our Velardeña Properties are denominated principally in Mexican pesos. These costs principally include electricity, labor, water, maintenance, local contractors and fuel. Accordingly, when inflation in Mexico increases without a corresponding devaluation of the Mexican peso, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. The annual inflation rate in Mexico was 4.1% in 2014, 4.0% in 2013 and 3.6% in 2012. At the same time, the peso has been subject to significant fluctuation, which may not have been proportionate to the inflation rate and may not be proportionate to the inflation rate in the future. The value of the peso decreased by 13% in 2014, decreased by 0.6% in 2013 and increased by 7.0% in 2012. In addition, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may have a significant impact on our financial results. There can be no assurance that the Mexican government will maintain its current policies with regard to the peso or that the peso’s value will not fluctuate significantly in the future. We cannot assure you that currency fluctuations, inflation and exchange control policies will not have an adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations, earnings and cash flows.

If we are unable to obtain all of our required governmental permits or obtain property rights on favorable terms or at all, our business could be negatively impacted.

Mining

Future mining and current processing at our Velardeña Properties, the continued evaluation of the El Quevar project and other exploration activities will require additional permits from various governmental authorities. Our business is and will continue to be governed by laws and regulations governing mining, exploration, prospecting, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety, mining royalties and other matters. We may also be required to obtain certain property rights to access or use our properties. Obtaining or renewing licenses and permits, and acquiring property rights, can be complex and time-consuming processes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire all required licenses, permits or property rights on reasonable terms or in a timely manner, or at all, and that such terms will not be adversely changed, that required extensions will be granted, or that the issuance of such licenses, permits or property rights will not be challenged by third parties. Delays in obtaining or a failure to obtain any licenses, permits or property rights or any required extensions; challenges to the issuance of licenses, permits or property rights, whether successful or unsuccessful; changes to the terms of licenses, permits or property rights; or a failure to comply with the terms of any licenses, permits or property rights that have been obtained could have a material adverse effect on our business by delaying, preventing or making future mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties and other continued processing at our Velardeña Properties, the continued evaluation of the El Quevar project and other exploration activities will require additional permits from various governmental authorities. Our business is and will continue to be governed by laws and regulations governing mining, exploration, prospecting, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety, mining royalties and other matters. We may also be required to obtain certain property rights to access or use our properties. Obtaining or renewing licenses and permits, and acquiring property rights, can be complex and time-consuming processes. There can be no assurance that we will be able to acquire all required licenses, permits or property rights on reasonable terms or in a timely manner, or at all, and that such terms will not be adversely changed, that required extensions will be granted, or that the issuance of such licenses, permits or property rights will not be challenged by third parties. Delays in obtaining or a failure to obtain any licenses, permits or property rights or any required extensions; challenges to the issuance of licenses, permits or property rights, whether successful or unsuccessful; changes to the terms of licenses, permits or property rights; or a failure to comply with the terms of any licenses, permits or property rights that have been obtained could have a material adverse effect on our business by delaying, preventing or making mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties and other continued mining activities economically unfeasible. U.S. or international legislative or regulatory action to address concerns about climate change and greenhouse gas emissions could also negatively impact our business. While we will continue to monitor and assess any new policies, legislation or regulations regarding such matters, we currently believe that the impact of such legislation on our business will not be significant.

We own our interest in the San Diego exploration property in Mexico in a 50-50 joint venture and are therefore unable to control all aspects of exploration and advancement of this property.

We hold the San Diego exploration property in Mexico in a 50-50 joint venture with Golden Tag Resources Ltd., which, until March 2015, has a right to acquire an additional 10% interest by making expenditures related to further exploration drilling and completing an updated resource assessment at the property. Our interest in the San Diego property is subject to the risks normally associated with the conduct of joint ventures. A disagreement between joint venture partners on how to conduct business efficiently, the inability of joint venture partners to meet their obligations to the joint venture or third parties, or litigation arising between joint venture partners regarding joint venture matters could have a material adverse effect on the viability of our interests held through the

31



joint venture. For example, in 2009, ECU received a notice of arbitration from Golden Tag Resources Ltd. The dispute was settled in September 2010 and resulted in an increase in ECU’s mining property costs of approximately $61,000. Additionally, if Golden Tag Resources Ltd. exercises its right to acquire an additional 10% interest, our ability to control exploration and advancement will be further reduced.

We depend on the services of key executives.

 

Our business strategy is based on leveraging the experience and skill of our management team. We are dependent on the services of key executives, including Jeffrey Clevenger, Robert Vogels and Warren Rehn.

Our business strategy is based on leveraging the experience and skill of our management team. We are dependent on the services of key executives, including Warren Rehn and Robert Vogels. Due to our relatively small size, the loss of any of these persons or our inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled employees may have a material adverse effect on our business and our ability to manage and succeed in our mining and exploration activities.

The exploration of our mineral properties is highly speculative in nature, involves substantial expenditures and is frequently non-productive.

 

Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature and is frequently non-productive. Substantial expenditures are required to:

Mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature and is frequently non-productive. Substantial expenditures are required to:

·

·

establish mineral reserves through drilling and metallurgical and other testing techniques;

·

determine metal content and metallurgical recovery processes to process metal from the ore;

·

determine the feasibility of mine development and production; and

·

construct, renovate or expand mining and processing facilities.

If we discover a deposit or ore at a property, it usually takes several years from the initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of a project may change because of increased costs, lower metal prices or other factors. As a result of these uncertainties, we may not successfully acquire additional mineral

42


rights, or our exploration programs may not result in proven and probable reserves at all or in sufficient quantities to justify developing the El Quevar project or any of our exploration properties.

The decisions about future advancement of exploration projects may be based on feasibility studies, which derive estimates of mineral reserves, operating costs and project economic returns. Estimates of economic returns are based, in part, on assumptions about future metal prices and estimates of average cash operating costs based upon, among other things:

If we discover ore at a property, it usually takes several years from the initial phases of exploration until production is possible. During this time, the economic feasibility of a project may change because of increased costs, lower metal prices or other factors. As a result of these uncertainties, we may not successfully acquire additional mineral rights, or our exploration programs may not result in proven and probable reserves at all or in sufficient quantities to justify developing the El Quevar project or any of our exploration properties.·

The decisions about future advancement of exploration projects may be based on feasibility studies, which derive estimates of mineral reserves, operating costs and project economic returns. Estimates of economic returns are based, in part, on assumptions about future metal prices and estimates of average cash operating costs based upon, among other things:

·anticipated tonnage, grades and metallurgical characteristics of ore to be mined and processed;

·

anticipated recovery rates of silver and other metals from the ore;

·

cash operating costs of comparable facilities and equipment; and

·

anticipated climatic conditions.

Actual cash operating costs, production and economic returns may differ significantly from those anticipated by our studies and estimates.

Actual cash operating costs, production and economic returns may differ significantly from those anticipated by our studies and estimates.

Lack of infrastructure could forestall or prevent further exploration and advancement.

 

Exploration activities, as well as any advancement activities, depend on adequate infrastructure. Reliable roads, bridges, power sources and water supply are important factors that affect capital and operating costs and the feasibility and economic viability of a project. Unanticipated or higher than expected costs and unusual or infrequent weather phenomena, or government or other interference in the maintenance or provision of such infrastructure, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

32



Our exploration activities are in countries with developing economies and are subject to the risks of political and economic instability associated with these countries.

 

We currently conduct exploration activities almost exclusively in countries with developing economies, including Argentina and Mexico. These countries and other emerging markets in which we may conduct business have from time to time experienced economic or political instability. We may be materially adversely affected by risks associated with conducting exploration activities in countries with developing economies, including:

We currently conduct exploration activities almost exclusively in countries with developing economies, including Argentina and Mexico. These countries and other emerging markets in which we may conduct business have from time to time experienced economic or political instability. We may be materially adversely affected by risks associated with conducting exploration activities in countries with developing economies, including:

·

·

political instability and violence;

·

war and civil disturbance;

·

acts of terrorism or other criminal activity;

·

expropriation or nationalization;

·

changing fiscal, royalty and tax regimes;

·

fluctuations in currency exchange rates;

·

high rates of inflation;

·

uncertain or changing legal requirements respecting the ownership and maintenance of mineral properties, mines and mining activities, and inconsistent or arbitrary application of such legal requirements;

43


·

underdeveloped industrial and economic infrastructure;

·

corruption; and

·

unenforceability of contractual rights.

Changes in mining or investment policies or shifts in the prevailing political climate in any of the countries in which we conduct exploration activities could adversely affect our business.

Changes in mining or investment policies or shifts in the prevailing political climate in any of the countries in which we conduct exploration activities could adversely affect our business.

We explore and mineconduct our business in countries that may be adversely affected by changes in the local government’s policies toward or laws governing the mining industry.

We have exploration activities primarily in Mexico and Argentina. In these regions there exist uncertainties regarding future changes in applicable law related to mining and exploration. For instance, in January 2014, amendments to the Mexico federal corporate income tax law require titleholders of mining concessions to pay annually a 7.5% duty of their mining related profits and a 0.5% duty on revenues obtained from the sale of gold, silver and platinum that were effective March 2015. These additional duties applicable to Mexico mining concession titleholders will have a significant impact on the annual costs applicable to the Velardeña Properties if we have mining related profits or significant revenues in the future.

Additionally, effective January 2015, the Argentina National Mining Code was amended, increasing the annual canon payment by approximately four times. In 2016 and 2017, our annual canon fees payable to the Argentine government was $112,000 and $113,000 respectively, and we expect to pay approximately $115,000 in 2018.

In addition to the risk of increased transaction costs, we do not maintain political risk insurance to cover losses that we may incur as a result of nationalization, expropriation or similar events in Mexico or Argentina where we explore or have mining and processing activities.

We have mining activities in Mexico and exploration activities primarily in Mexico and Argentina. In these regions there exist uncertainties regarding future changes in applicable law related to mining and exploration. For instance, effective January 2014, amendments to the Mexico federal corporate income tax law require titleholders of mining concessions to pay annually a 7.5% duty of their mining related profits and a 0.5% duty on revenues obtained from the sale of gold, silver and platinum. These additional duties applicable to Mexico mining concession titleholders will have a significant impact on the annual costs applicable to the Velardeña Properties if we have mining related profits or significant revenues in the future.

Additionally, effective January 2015, the Argentina National Mining Code was amended, increasing the annual canon payment by approximately four times. As a result, we expect our annual canon fees payable to the Argentine government to increase from approximately $35,000 in 2014 to approximately $110,000 in 2015.

Furthermore, as a result of the termination of a bilateral tax treaty among Spain and Argentina (terminated January 2013), certain beneficial tax treatment arising from equity ownership between our Spain and Argentina subsidiaries was eliminated. Consequently, we recorded a liability of approximately $0.3 million as of December 31, 2014 and could be liable for up to an additional $0.7 million stemming from a tax audit of this equity tax for years 2009 through 2012.

In addition to the risk of increased transaction costs, we do not maintain political risk insurance to cover losses that we may incur as a result of nationalization, expropriation or similar events in Mexico or Argentina where we explore or have mining and processing activities.

We compete against larger and more experienced companies.

The mining industry is intensely competitive. Many large mining companies are primarily makers of precious or base metals and may become interested in the types of deposits on which we are focused, which include silver, gold and other precious metals deposits or polymetallic deposits containing significant quantities of base metals, including zinc, lead and copper. Many of these companies have greater financial resources, experience and technical capabilities than we do. We may encounter increasing

33

The mining industry is intensely competitive. Many large mining companies are primarily makers of precious or base metals and may become interested in the types of deposits on which we are focused, which include silver, gold and other precious metals deposits or polymetallic deposits containing significant quantities of base metals, including zinc, lead and copper. Many of these companies have greater financial resources, experience and technical capabilities than we do. We may encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in our efforts to acquire mineral properties and hire experienced mining professionals. Increased competition in our business could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable mining properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.



competition from other mining companies in our efforts to acquire mineral properties and hire experienced mining professionals. Increased competition in our business could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable mining properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.

We are dependent on information technology systems, which are subject to certain risks, including cybersecurity risks and data leakage risks.

We are dependent upon information technology systems in the conduct of our business. Any significant breakdown, invasion, virus, cyber attack, security breach, destruction or interruption of these systems by employees, others with authorized access to our systems, or unauthorized persons could negatively impact our business. To the extent any invasion, cyber attack or security breach results in disruption to our business, loss or disclosure of, or damage to, our data or confidential information, our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Our systems and insurance coverage for protecting against cyber security risks may not be sufficient. Although to date we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber attacks, we may suffer such losses in the future. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective

44


measures. We also may be subject to significant litigation, regulatory investigation and remediation costs associated with any information security vulnerabilities, cyber attacks or security breaches.

We are dependent upon information technology systems in the conduct of our business. Any significant breakdown, invasion, virus, cyber attack, security breach, destruction or interruption of these systems by employees, others with authorized access to our systems, or unauthorized persons could negatively impact our business. To the extent any invasion, cyber attack or security breach results in disruption to our business, loss or disclosure of, or damage to, our data or confidential information, our reputation, business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected. Our systems and insurance coverage for protecting against cyber security risks may not be sufficient. Although to date we have not experienced any material losses relating to cyber attacks, we may suffer such losses in the future. We may be required to expend significant additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities.

Our stockholders may suffer additional dilution to their equity and voting interests as a result of future financing transactions.

We could require additional funding to support our business, including for general and administrative costs and other working capital needs to fund our continuing business activities as currently conducted. Because debt financing is difficult to obtain for early-stage mining companies, it is likely that we will seek such financing in the equity markets. If we were to engage in any type of equity financing, the current ownership interest of our stockholders would be diluted.

The existence of a significant number of warrants and options may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.

        In connection with our financing in May 2016, we issued five year warrants to acquire 6,000,000 shares of our common stock at $0.75 per share expiring in November 2021. In connection with our financing in September 2014, we issued five year warrants to acquire 4,746,000 shares of our common stock at $1.21 per share expiring in September 2019. Pursuant to the anti-dilution clauses in the September 2014 warrant agreements, the exercise price of the warrants has been adjusted downward as a result of the subsequent issuance of the Company's common stock in separate transactions, including pursuant to the Hecla Share Issuance (as defined herein), our ATM Program, the May 2016 financing, and the conversion of the Sentient Senior Secured Convertible Note (the “Sentient Note”). As a result of these transactions, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the September 2014 warrants was increased from the original 4,746,000 shares to 5,478,172 shares (732,172 share increase) and the exercise price was reduced from the original $1.21 per share to $0.87 per share. The existence of securities available for exercise and resale is referred to as an "overhang," and, particularly if the warrants are "in the money," the anticipation of potential sales could exert downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.

Failure to meet the maintenance criteria of the NYSE American may result in the delisting of our common stock, at $1.21 per share expiringwhich could result in September 2019. In connection withlower trading volumes and liquidity, lower prices of our financing in September 2012, we issued five year warrantscommon shares and make it more difficult for us to purchase 3,431,649 sharesraise capital.

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE American, and we are subject to its continued listing requirements, including maintaining certain share prices and a minimum amount of shareholders equity. The market price of our common stock has been and may continue to be subject to significant fluctuation. If we are unable to comply with the NYSE American continued listing requirements, including its trading price requirements, our common stock may be suspended from trading on and/or delisted from the NYSE American. Alternatively, in order to avoid delisting by the NYSE American, we may be required to effect a reverse split of our common stock. Although we have not been notified of any delisting proceedings, there is no assurance that we will not receive such notice in the future or that we will be able to then comply with NYSE American listing standards. The delisting of our common stock from the NYSE American may materially impair our stockholders' ability to buy and sell our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of the trading market for, our common stock. In addition, the delisting of our common stock could significantly impair our ability to raise capital.

If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer could find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock at an exercise price of $8.42 per share expiring September 2017. Pursuant to a weighted average dilution calculation based on the pricing in the September 2014 financing, the exercise price for the September 2012 warrants was reduced to $7.17 and the number of shares issuable on exercise of the warrants increased to 4,031,409. The existence of securities available for exercise and resale is referred to as an “overhang,” and, particularly if the warrants are “in the money,” the anticipation of potential sales could exert downward pressure on the market price of our common stock.secondary market.

If our common stock were removed from listing on the NYSE American, it may be subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price per share of less than $5.00, subject to certain exceptions, such as any securities listed on a national securities exchange. For any transaction involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions. If our common stock were delisted and determined to be a “penny stock,” a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our common stock and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common stock on the secondary market. These factors could significantly negatively affect the market price of our common stock and our ability to raise capital.

45


ITEM 1B:  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

None.

 

ITEM 3:  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

None.

 

ITEM 4:  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not applicable.

 

34


46



 

PART II

 

ITEM 5:  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Our common stock began trading on the NYSE MKTAmerican under the symbol “AUMN” on March 19, 2010. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share and volume traded on the NYSE MKTAmerican from January 1, 20132016 through December 31, 2014.2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Volume

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traded

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

(shares)

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

0.68

 

$

0.13

 

16,384,800

 

Second Quarter

 

$

0.94

 

$

0.31

 

45,674,400

 

Third Quarter

 

$

1.16

 

$

0.66

 

53,664,500

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.84

 

$

0.58

 

27,452,000

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Volume
Traded
(shares)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Volume

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traded

 

 

High

 

Low

 

(shares)

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

4.87

 

$

2.16

 

22,167,600

 

 

$

0.85

 

$

0.55

 

18,106,800

 

Second Quarter

 

$

2.47

 

$

1.26

 

23,835,600

 

 

$

0.68

 

$

0.45

 

9,827,800

 

Third Quarter

 

$

1.64

 

$

0.90

 

21,376,400

 

 

$

0.64

 

$

0.48

 

9,855,100

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.98

 

$

0.42

 

12,190,000

 

 

$

0.50

 

$

0.37

 

7,101,300

 

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Volume
Traded
(shares)

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

1.28

 

$

0.49

 

33,281,000

 

Second Quarter

 

$

1.58

 

$

0.50

 

15,413,700

 

Third Quarter

 

$

1.59

 

$

0.57

 

21,963,800

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.78

 

$

0.42

 

10,307,300

 

47


 

Our common stock is also listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, also referred to as the “TSX”, and trades under the symbol “AUM”“AUMN”. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share expressed in Canadian dollars and volume traded on the TSX from January 1, 20132016 through December 31, 2014.2017.

 

 

High
(Cdn$)(1)

 

Low
(Cdn$)(1)

 

Volume
Traded
(shares)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Volume

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Traded

 

 

(Cdn$)(1)

 

(Cdn$)(1)

 

(shares)

 

2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

4.79

 

$

2.23

 

1,444,900

 

 

$

0.93

 

$

0.19

 

1,543,600

 

Second Quarter

 

$

2.53

 

$

1.10

 

1,914,200

 

 

$

1.22

 

$

0.42

 

5,822,300

 

Third Quarter

 

$

1.74

 

$

0.94

 

617,900

 

 

$

1.51

 

$

0.88

 

5,043,100

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

1.00

 

$

0.44

 

1,182,200

 

 

$

1.10

 

$

0.77

 

2,239,400

 

 

 

 

High
(Cdn$)(1)

 

Low
(Cdn$)(1)

 

Volume
Traded
(shares)

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

1.42

 

$

0.54

 

2,556,600

 

Second Quarter

 

$

1.70

 

$

0.55

 

1,543,500

 

Third Quarter

 

$

1.69

 

$

0.65

 

1,377,300

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.91

 

$

0.53

 

784,900

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Volume

 

 

 

High

 

Low

 

Traded

 

 

 

(Cdn$)(1)

 

(Cdn$)(1)

 

(shares)

 

2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

First Quarter

 

$

1.10

 

$

0.73

 

1,549,900

 

Second Quarter

 

$

0.88

 

$

0.61

 

676,900

 

Third Quarter

 

$

0.75

 

$

0.59

 

274,100

 

Fourth Quarter

 

$

0.62

 

$

0.47

 

550,400

 


(1)

(1)           Prices are in Canadian dollars.

 

As of February 25, 2015,27, 2018, we had 232201 record holders of our common stock of record based upon the stockholders list provided by our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

 

Dividends

 

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all future earnings, if any, to fund the growth of our business.

35



 

ITEM 6:  SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

 

The selected consolidated financial data for all periods presented has been derived from our audited financial statements for that period. Our financial statements are reported in U.S. dollars and have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The following selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in this Form 10-K.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

    

2013

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

Statement of Operations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

235

 

$

10,680

 

$

26,086

 

$

1,836

 

$

11,216

 

 

$

6,691

 

$

6,400

 

$

8,071

 

$

235

 

$

10,680

 

Net Loss(1)

 

$

(18,823

)

$

(240,380

)

$

(92,025

)

$

(62,671

)

$

(33,274

)

 

$

(3,892)

 

$

(10,659)

 

$

(25,383)

 

$

(18,823)

 

$

(240,380)

 

Net Loss per common share

 

$

(0.41

)

$

(5.61

)

$

(2.45

)

$

(2.94

)

$

(3.72

)

 

$

(0.04)

 

$

(0.13)

 

$

(0.48)

 

$

(0.41)

 

$

(5.61)

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2012

 

2011

 

2010

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

41,258

 

$

54,881

 

$

348,102

 

$

413,015

 

$

135,618

 

Long term liabilities

 

$

4,334

 

$

2,655

 

$

49,524

 

$

59,672

 

$

802

 

Dividends:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

48


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

    

2015

    

2014

    

2013

 

Balance Sheet Data:

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

13,077

 

$

14,008

 

$

17,001

 

$

41,258

 

$

54,881

 

Long term liabilities

 

$

3,138

 

$

4,398

 

$

2,840

 

$

4,334

 

$

2,655

 

Dividends:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash dividends declared per common share

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 


(1)

The year ended December 31, 2015 includes a $13.2 million impairment of long-lived assets charge. The impairment charge is related to our Velardeña Properties in Mexico and is the result of the shutdown of mining and sulfide processing at the Velardeña Properties in November 2015, which was an event requiring an assessment of the recoverability of the Velardeña Properties assets. There were no such charges during the year ended December 31, 2016. The year ended December 31, 2013 includes a $244.0 million impairment of long-lived assets charge and an $11.7 million impairment of goodwill charge. Both charges are related to our Velardeña Properties in Mexico and are the result of a significant decrease in metals prices during 2013 and the shutdown of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties at the end of the second quarter 2013, which were events requiring an assessment of the recoverability of the Velardeña Properties assets.

49


ITEM 7:  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes beginning on page F-1 in this annual report on Form 10-K. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in this annual report on Form 10-K.

 

Our Company

 

We were incorporated in Delaware under the Delaware General Corporation Law in March 2009, and are the successor to Apex Silver Mines Limited for purposes of reporting under the Exchange Act. During the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, our only sources of income were revenues from the salelease of lead and zinc concentrates from our Velardeña Properties, royalty and interest income, andoxide plant, sales of non-core exploration properties.assets, and a tax refund received by an Argentine subsidiary. We incurred net operating losses for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013.

2014 Highlights2016.

 

We recommencedremain focused on evaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near term prospects of mining, and particularly for properties within reasonable haulage distances of our Velardeña processing plants. We are also reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico.  During 2018, we also intend to continue evaluation activities at the Velardeña Propertiesour El Quevar exploration property in July 2014Argentina and began processing material from the mine in November 2014. Our decision to restart mining activities followed an extensive evaluation period, which began after the shutdown of the Velardeña Properties in June 2013 and included a 9,000-meter drill program that concluded in June 2014. In addition to the Velardeña Properties, we are focused on establishing a second group of mining assets, which may include those recently acquired assets in the Parral District in Chihuahua Mexico. During 2014 we continued our exploration efforts on selected properties in our portfolio of approximately 3010 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico. We continued to hold our El Quevar property on care and maintenance until we can find a partner to further advance the project. We reduced general and administrative expenses in 2014 by approximately 17% over 2013 expenses. We also continued to review strategic opportunities, focusing on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico.

 

Financing Activities

2017 Highlights

 

·On September 10, 2014, the Company completed an underwritten registered public offering and concurrent private placement for total net proceeds, after underwriter commissions and expenses, of $7.4 million. The Company sold 3,692,000 units in the registered offering, priced at $0.86 per unit, before discount to the underwriters, with each unit consisting of one share of theVelardeña Oxide Plant Lease Agreement

 

36In July 2015, we leased our Velardeña oxide plant to a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company for an initial term of 18 months beginning July 1, 2015. The lease agreement contained several lease extension options, and in the third quarter 2016, the lease was extended through June 2017. The 2016 extension included an agreement under which Hecla would construct, at its cost, certain tailings expansion facilities to accommodate Hecla's increased use of tailings capacity in excess of an agreed amount, while preserving flexibility for future tailings expansions. The tailings expansion work began in early 2017 and is now completed. The parties agreed that Hecla would either leave unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility, or construct an additional expansion at its cost. In connection with their agreement regarding tailings impoundment expansions, the parties agreed that Hecla had the right to extend the lease for an additional 18 months following June 30, 2017, or until December 31, 2018. On March 24, 2017, Hecla exercised its right to extend the lease until December 31, 2018.



 

Company’sOn August 2, 2017, we granted Hecla an option to extend the lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 (the “Extension Period”) in exchange for a $1.0 million cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares, of our common stock and a five year warrant to purchase 0.50 of a share of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.21 per share. The Company sold an additional 5,800,000 units in a concurrent private placement to The Sentient Group (“Sentient”), the Company’s largest stockholder,issued at a price of $0.817$0.55 per unit,share, which was the undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price at the time of the option agreement. Hecla must exercise the option to extend the lease no later than October 3, 2018. All of the fixed fees and throughput related charges remain the same discounted price paidas under the original lease. Similar volume limitations apply to any required future tailings expansions, which Hecla will fund, leaving unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility. Hecla will have the right to terminate the lease during the Extension Period for any reason with 120 days’ notice. Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following a termination notice through December 31, 2020 if we decide to use the oxide plant for our own purposes before December 31, 2020.

50


Hecla is responsible for ongoing operation and maintenance of the oxide plant. During the year ended December 31, 2017, Hecla processed approximately 131,000 tonnes of material through the oxide plant, resulting in total revenues to us of approximately $6.7 million, comprised of approximately $3.0 million for direct plant charges plus fixed fees and other net reimbursable costs totaling approximately $3.7 million. We incurred costs of approximately $2.1 million related to the services we provide under the lease and reported a net operating margin of approximately $4.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. We expect Hecla to continue to process material near the intended approximately 400 tonnes per day rate during 2018, which would generate cash payments to us, net of reimbursable costs, of approximately $4.6 million during the full year 2018.  However, because Hecla has the right to terminate the lease on sixty days’ notice, there is no assurance that these amounts will be received.

El Quevar

In February 2018 we announced a revised estimate of mineralized material for the Yaxtché deposit at El Quevar based on re-modeling existing previously released data using updated geologic controls and a modeling method that optimizes grade. See “Item 1 and 2: Business and Properties – El Quevar – Mineralized Material Estimate” above. 

We are evaluating plans for further exploration drilling to increase the size of the high grade silver resource at or near the Yaxtché deposit and for preparation of a PEA that will use the revised estimate of mineralized material for the Yaxtché deposit as a basis.  The Yaxtché deposit is open to the west and there are numerous drill intercepts with silver grades of economic interest in the nearby area that represent targets for further expansion.  We plan to continue to advance El Quevar as much as possible within the limits of our current exploration budget and remain open to finding a partner to contribute to the funding of further exploration and development.

During 2017, we received $1.1 million in refunds of previous VAT payments madein Argentina during 2012 and 2013.  The refunds, available through certain provisions in the Argentina Mining Investment Law, have been pending for several years, but were only recently approved for payment by the underwriterArgentine tax authority.  In February 2018, we received an additional $138,000 of VAT refunds and we have approximately $0.1 million of VAT refund claims remaining. 

Santa Maria

Since 2015, we have completed test mining and processing of 7,500 tons from the Santa Maria mine west of Hildalgo de Parral, Chihuahua, with average grades 338 grams per tonne (“gpt”) silver and 0.7 gpt gold. In March 2017, a PEA was completed on our behalf by the engineering firm Tetra Tech, prepared pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101, based on an updated estimate of mineralized material. The PEA presented a base case assessment of developing Santa Maria’s mineral deposit. The PEA contemplates a 38-month underground mining operation at a mining rate of 200 tonnes per day using a combination of cut and fill and other mining techniques, and custom milling at a local third-party flotation mill. Based on the assumptions in the registered offering.PEA, we believe there may be potential to develop a small mining operation at Santa Maria.

In August 2017, we acquired three additional claims that cover the eastward extension of the Santa Maria vein. The new claims provide a 600 meter potential extension to the strike length of the vein system and add substantial downdip expansion potential.  In August 2017, we also commenced a new drill program targeting extensions of the vein deposit described in the PEA and recent estimate of mineralized material with the goal of expanding the existing estimate of mineralized material to improve the overall economics reported in the PEA.

Through the end of 2017, we drilled 14 holes totaling approximately 3,300 meters, and have received completed assay results showing mineralized intercepts in most of the holes.  We increased the drill program from an original 2,000 meters to approximately 4,800 meters due to the geologic complexity along the eastern extension and newly encountered mineralization on the western extension of the vein system. Based on the results of the 2017 drilling program, we anticipate that we will be able to increase the size of the existing mineralized material estimate, although the extent of that increase

51


has not yet been determined.  We are continuing to drill in 2018 and have completed 1,000 meters in five drill holes.  We will likely complete another 500 meters in three additional drill holes before completing the program, after which we plan to review the drill results and revise the existing PEA and mineralized material estimate.

We have the right to acquire the Santa Maria property under two separate option agreements representing the total concessions that comprise the property for additional payments of $1.4 million, payable through April 2022. The first option agreement, covering concessions we acquired in August 2014, requires an additional approximately $0.7 million be paid to acquire a 100% interest in the concessions related to that option by continuing to make minimum payments of $0.1 in 2018 and $0.2 in each of the years 2019 through 2021.  In addition, until the total due under the first option agreement has been paid, the property owners have the right to 50% of any net profits from mining activities from the concessions related to the option, after reimbursement of all costs incurred by us since April 2015, to the extent that such net profit payments exceed the minimum payments.  The second option agreement, covering concessions recently acquired in August 2017, requires an additional approximately $0.7 million be paid to acquire a 100% interest in the concessions related to that option by making additional payments of $0.1 million in 2018 and $0.2 million in each of the years 2019 through 2021.

Celaya Farm-out

In August 2016, our wholly owned Mexican subsidiary entered into an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum Global Holdings, L.P., a privately owned company (together “Electrum”), related to our Celaya exploration property in Mexico. We received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling at least $0.5 million within the first year of the agreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurred on the property since December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program. Electrum, at its option, can elect to acquire an undivided 60% interest in a joint venture company to be formed to hold the Celaya project after incurring exploration expenditures totaling $2.5 million during the initial first three years of the agreement. Electrum would serve as manager of the joint venture.  Prior to an amendment to the agreement, we would have been allowed to maintain a 40% interest in the Celaya project, following the initial three-year earn-in period, by contributing our pro-rata share of an additional $2.5 million in exploration or development expenditures incurred over a second three-year period.  In February 2018, we amended the Celaya earn-in agreement to permit Electrum to earn, at its option, an additional 20% interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a payment of $1.0 million.  Electrum can now increase its total interest in the project to 80% by contributing 100% of the $2.5 million of additional expenditures required in the second three-year earn-in period.  Following the second earn-in period we will have the right to maintain our 20% participating interest or our interest could ultimately be converted into a carried 10% net profits interest if we elect not to participate as a joint venture owner.

Electrum Global Holdings’ Mexican subsidiary, Minera Adularia, has reported the completion of 12,400 meters of drilling on the Private Placementproperty in fifteen drill holes in their ongoing drill program through the end of 2017. Results to date show intercepts of epithermal quartz vein mineralization with grades for gold, silver, lead and zinc that warrant further drill testing.

Other Exploration Activities

Mogotes.    During the Offering, Sentient holds approximately 27.2% (onfourth quarter 2017 we completed a non-diluted basis)2,580 meter drill program on our Mogotes property on the El Mogote claim located 7 kilometers southeast of the Company’s outstanding common stock (excluding restricted common stock heldtown of Velardeña, Durango, Mexico. The drill program was planned to test an area of silicification and breccias hosted in volcanic rocks.  The altered area is exposed over a strike length of 1.5 kilometers and a width of about 500 meters.  Results from the drill program showed low grade gold mineralization in two of the holes.  The epithermal system appears to be more deeply centered than the surface geochemical values initially indicated. 

Additional targeting work is being carried out on the Mogotes claims including geologic mapping and sampling focused on several outcropping veins in the northern portion of the claims and on our adjacent Pistachon claim, part of

52


the Chicago mine holdings.  Previous work on the Mogotes property identified the possible continuation of Industrias Peñoles’ Santa Maria silver-zinc mine mineralization onto our Mogotes claims.

The Mogotes property was purchased from Silver Standard Resources in 2015 and is wholly owned by the Company’s employees)one of Golden Minerals’ Mexican subsidiaries, subject to a 2% net smelter return royalty to Silver Standard and a pre-existing finder’s fee agreement (2% of direct exploration and development expenditures, capped at $365,000).

 

SaleYoquivo. In October 2017 we acquired the right to purchase claims covering the Yoquivo District, Ocampo Municipality, Chihuahua through an option agreement.  The Yoquivo District is a past producing, bonanza grade epithermal vein gold and silver district located 35 kilometers southeast of Assetsthe Ocampo Mining District.  We have the right to purchase six claims totaling 1,906 hectares for payment of $0.5 million over four years plus outstanding claim taxes totaling approximately $0.1 million.  No cash payments to the owner are due until the second anniversary of the agreement.  The owner retains a 2% net smelter return royalty capped at $2.0 million.

 

·Zacatecas. We generated approximately $1.0 million In April 2016, we entered into an option agreement under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. may acquire our interest in asset sales in 2014, including $700,000 from the sale of mining concessions totaling 770 hectarescertain nonstrategic mineral claims located in the Zacatecas Mining District, Zacatecas, Mexico for a series of payments totaling $1.5 million, including a final payment of $0.5 million due in Mexico, $150,000 as partial paymentApril 2018. To date, Santacruz has paid us approximately $0.9 million.  We amended the option agreement in February 2018 to extend the due dates for the saleremaining series of payments through September 2018.  To complete the acquisition of the Zacatecas Properties Santacruz must now make three additional payments of $225,000 each in March, June and September 2018.  Santacruz has the right to terminate the option agreement at any time, and the agreement could be terminated, at our 1,100 hectare Peruvian Otuzco property, and $130,000 from the sale of miscellaneous surplus equipment located in Argentina.option, if Santacruz fails to make subsequent payments when due.

 

Restart of MiningRodeo.    During 2016, we completed a 2,080-meter core drilling program at the Velardeña PropertiesRodeo property, approximately 80

·Following the shutdownkilometers west of the Velardeña Properties in June 2013, we continuedDurango Mexico. The results from the program revealed a gold andsilver bearing epithermal vein and breccia system with encouraging gold and silver values over an approximate 50 to develop and evaluate plans to restart mining. We completed this evaluation and new mine plans in the second quarter 2014. In July 2014 we restarted mining70 meter true width. The system is exposed at the Velardeñtop of a Propertiesnorthwesterly striking ridge and began processingdips steeply to thenortheast over about one kilometer of strike length. During January 2017, the engineering firm of Tetra Techcompleted an estimate of mineralized material fromat the mine in November 2014. During 2014 we generated payable metals totaling approximately 42,000Rodeo deposit, prepared pursuant to Canadian NationalInstrument 43-101, containing 3.3 gpt gold and 11 gpt silver equivalent ounces (equivalents calculated at 70:1 silver to gold) and included approximately 29,000for a total of 46,000 ounces of silvergold and 1940.2 million ounces of gold. In 2015 we expect outputsilver. We believe this material, as currently identified, could provide additional mined material for ourVelardeña oxide mill following the completion of approximately 0.8the Hecla lease, currently set to 1.0 million silver equivalent ounces (including silver and gold but excluding lead and zinc and calculated at a ratio of 70 silver ounces to 1 gold ounce), with cash costs in 2015 between $12.00 and $15.00 per payable silver ounce net of by-product gold, lead and zinc credits, assuming a price for gold of $1,250 per ounce. “Cash costs per payable silver ounce, net of by-product credits” is a non-GAAP financial measure defined below in “—Non-GAAP Financial Measures”.expire December 31, 2020.

 

·UnderIn initial test work conducted during 2017, we have received confirmation of good gold and silver metallurgical recoveries for milled material. Bottle roll cyanide leach testing of the high-grade samples resulted in gold extractions of 80 to 86 percent. Silver extractions ranged from 72 to 76 percent for all tests. Test work also indicates that the material is not suitable for gold and silver recovery by heap leaching.

Due to the extension of the lease period for the oxide mill, plans to advance the Rodeo project have been delayed until later in 2018.

Sale of Mining Equipment

In August 2016, we sold certain mining equipment consisting of two haul trucks, two scoop trams and a compressor to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of The Sentient Group, a related party, for $687,000. The equipment sold was excess equipment held at our new mine plan,Velardeña Properties that we are using shrinkage stope mining, standard mechanized cut and fill and an overhand cut and fill mining method and slusher muckingdid not expect to use. We used a third party consultant with experience in the stopesused mining equipment market in Mexico to determine a fair value. We believe the price paid was at least equal to the fair market value of the equipment had it been sold through auction or in the narrower veins. This later mining method should allow usopen market. We received 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale in August, with the additional 90%, plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, due in February 2017.

53


With the approval of a Special Committee of our Board of Directors, we amended the original equipment sale with Minera Indé on March 31, 2017 to mine narrower vein widths with a significant decrease in dilution, which should allow higher grade materialinclude the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000 and extend the time for payment relating to the original equipment sale.  Upon execution of the amendment, we received an additional payment of $100,000. The remaining principal and interest balance, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, was amended to be hauleddue in August 2017.  On May 2, 2017, we received approximately $750,000 from Minera Indé as payment in full for the remaining balance due related to the mill. Since reopening Velardeña, we have employed about half of the employees prior to the June 2013 shutdown when we were running both sulfide and oxide plants and processing approximately 500 tonnes per day (“tpd”). In 2014 we processed mined material to make silver and gold bearing lead and zinc concentrates, and in 2015 we expect to also make saleable pyrite concentrates. During 2014 and 2015 we are focused primarily on mining on the San Mateo, Terneras and Roca Negra veins, which contain higher grade material over more consistent widths in the 0.5 to 1.0 meter range, with significantly lower arsenic levels than those in the Santa Juana vein systemequipment sale, including interest through that was the focus of our previous mining activity.date.

 

·We began processing material throughAt the sulfide mill in November 2014. During November 2014 we tested new equipment in the mill including a revamped electrical system, concentrate filters for our concentrate products, refurbished flotation cells and other equipment. Grades were low in November 2014 as we processed material from stope access drifts and raises to test plant circuits that were refurbished as part of the restart. Average grades in November were 109 grams per tonne silver and 1.3 grams per tonne gold, with payable metals generated from the processing facilities of approximately 12,000 silver equivalent ounces, which is exclusive of process inventory buildup in the circuit.  In December 2014 the mill began operating at nearly full capacity of an average 264 tpd. We are continuing to ramp up to the 285 tpd rate, which we expect to achieve late in the first quarter 2015. Average grades in December had increased to 127 grams per tonne silver and 1.8 grams per tonne gold, with payable metals generated from the processing facilities of approximately 31,000 silver equivalent ounces. We expect feed material grades to gradually increase through the second quarter of 2015 as new stopes in the mine are developed and access to the Terneras vein increases. We also continue to actively search for oxide feed from outside sources, which could enable us to restart the oxide plant.

El QuevarMarket Offering Program

 

·We continue to hold our El Quevar property on care and maintenance and to reduce holding costs until we can find a partner to fund further exploration.

37



Exploration

·In the first quarter 2014, we completed a 2,000 meter drill program at the 233 hectare Los Azules property in Chihuahua, Mexico. Based on results from this phase one drilling program, we conducted a phase two drill program and have completed in both programs a total of 7,475 meters in 30 holes drilled from both surface and underground. Based on these drill results and underground sampling, we believe we have identified a silver and gold deposit and expect to issue a report regarding the results of these programs in the first quarter 2015.

·In August 2014,December 2016, we entered into an at-the-market offering agreement giving us(as amended from time to time, the rightATM Agreement”) with H. C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“Wainwright”), under which we may, from time to acquiretime, issue and sell shares of our common stock through Wainwright as sales manager in an at-the-market offering under a prospectus supplement for $1.6aggregate sales proceeds of up to $5.0 million or a maximum of 10 million shares.  The ATM Agreement will remain in full force and effect until the Santa Maria mine, a privately held property nearearlier of December 31, 2018, or until the Parral District of southern Chihuahua State, Mexico, located approximately 20 kilometers fromdate that the Los Azules project. We have completed an initial drill program of 11 holes totaling 2,300 meters at Santa Maria and identified a silver and gold deposit. We expect to issue a report onATM Agreement is terminated in accordance with the results in the first quarter 2015.terms therein.

 

Through December 31, 2017, we have sold an aggregate of approximately 1,024,000 common shares under the ATM Program at an average price of $0.70 per common share for gross proceeds of approximately $720,000. We paid cash commissions and other nominal transaction fees to Wainwright totaling approximately $16,000 or 2.2% of the gross proceeds and incurred additional accounting, legal and regulatory costs of approximately $34,000.

Results of Operations

 

For the results of operations discussed below, we compare the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 20142017 to the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016.

 

Revenue from the sale of metals.oxide plant lease. We recorded $0.2revenue of $6.7 million and $10.7$6.4 million of revenue for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016 respectively all from the salelease of metals from our Velardeña Properties in Mexico. The decrease in revenue in 2014 is primarily the result of the suspension of mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties from June 2013 until processing mined material resumed in November 2014, as discussed above.oxide plant to Hecla.

 

Costs of metals sold.Oxide plant lease costs. We recorded $1.7 million and $17.5 million of costs applicable to sales forDuring the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013, respectively. The decrease2016 we recorded $2.2 and $2.0 million, respectively of costs related to the oxide plant lease consisting primarily of reimbursable labor and utility costs which for accounting purposes were also included in cost of metals sold in 2014 is primarilyrevenue from the result of the suspension of mining and processing at our Velardeña Properties from June 2013 until mining activity resumed in July 2014 and processing resumed in November 2014, as discussed above. Included in costs of metals sold for the period ended December 31, 2014 was a $1.2 million write down of finished goods inventory to estimated net realizable value.oxide plant lease.

 

Exploration Expense.  Our exploration expense, including property holding costswork at the Santa Maria, Mogotes and allocated administrative expenses,other properties, totaled $5.5$3.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, as compared to $4.62017. Our exploration expense, including drilling at the San Luis del Cordero, Santa Maria, and Rodeo properties, totaled $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016.  Exploration expense for both years was incurred primarily in Mexico Peru, and Argentina (excluding amounts spent on the Yaxtché deposit at the El Quevar project) and includes property holding costs, and costs incurred by our local exploration offices. The increase in exploration expenses in 2014 is primarily related to the 2014 drilling program at our Velardeña Properties.offices, and allocated corporate administrative expenses.

 

Velardeña Project Expense.  During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 we incurred approximately $3.1 million and $3.1 million of expenses, respectively, primarily related to the restart of mining and processing activities in 2014 and the construction of the San Mateo ramp and other mine construction and engineering work in 2013 at our Velardeña Properties.  In addition to amounts expensed, we incurred capital expenditures of approximately $0.5 million and $1.8 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively for plant construction, mining and other equipment.

Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance costs.  We recorded $2.5$1.6 million and $6.4$2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, for expenses related to shutdownshut down and care and maintenance at our Velardeña Properties as the result of the suspension of mining and processing activities at the Velardeña Properties from June 2013 until mining activity resumed in July 2014 and processing mined material resumed in November 2014, as discussed above.2015. The 2016 expense included certain one-time repair and maintenance costs associated with the plant shut down.

 

El Quevar Project Expense.  During the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 we incurred $1.6$0.8 million and $2.6$0.5 million of expenses, respectively, primarily related to furthering our evaluation and holding costs for the Yaxtché deposit at our El Quevar project in Argentina. The reduction2017 expense included certain property evaluation costs not incurred in 2016. For both years, additional nominal costs for 2014 is primarily the result of placingincurred in Argentina and not related to the El Quevar project in a holding and maintenance state during 2014.  For both years, costs incurred for work performed outside of the Yaxtché deposit in Argentina are included in “—Exploration Expense”, discussed above.

 

54


Administrative Expense.  Administrative expenses totaled $4.6$3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 20142017 compared to $5.6$3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016. Administrative expenses, including costs associated with being a public company, are incurred primarily by our corporate activities in support of the Velardeña Properties, El Quevar project and our exploration portfolio.  The $4.6$3.5 million of administrative expenses we incurred during 20142017 is comprised of $1.9$1.6 million of employee compensation and directors’ fees, $1.2$0.8 million of professional fees and $1.5$1.1 million of insurance, rents, travel expenses, utilities and other office costs. The $5.6$3.9 million of administrative expenses we incurred during 20132016 is comprised of $2.2$1.4 million of employee compensation and directors’ fees, $1.4$1.3 million of professional fees and $2.0$1.2 million of insurance, travel expenses, rents, utilities and other office costs.  Administrative expenses were lower in 2014 due primarily to fewer staff employees and lower auditing and other professional fees.

 

38



Stock based compensation.  During the year ended December 31, 20142017 we incurred expense related to stock based compensation in the amount of $0.9$0.3 million compared to $1.6$0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016. Stock based compensation varies from period to period depending on the number and timing of shares granted, the type of grant, the market value of the shares on the date of grant and other variables. The 2017 and 2016 stock based compensation amounts includes $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to KELTIP grants made to two officers (see Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Form 10-K for a discussion of KELTIP grants).

 

Reclamation and accretion expense.  During each of the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 we incurred $0.2 million of reclamation expense related to the accretion of an asset retirement obligation at the Velardeña Properties.

 

Impairment of long lived assets and goodwill.  We assess the recoverability of our long lived assets, including goodwill, at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may be impaired.  There was no impairment of our long lived assets for the year ended December 31, 2014.   During 2013, the significant decrease in metals prices and the shutdown of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties during June 2013 were events that required an assessment of the recoverability of the Velardeña Properties asset group and goodwill.  We completed an impairment analysis using a market valuation approach which relies upon assumptions related to the Velardeña Properties asset group in comparison to other corroborated observable market data.  At June 30, 2013 we determined that both the long lived assets and the goodwill associated with the Velardeña Properties and the San Diego property were impaired.  As a result at June 30, 2013 we recorded a $237.8 million impairment charge related to the long lived assets and an $11.2 million impairment charge related to goodwill.  At December 31, 2013 we reviewed the remaining carrying value of the long lived assets and goodwill based on the corroborated observable market data at that date and determined that the long lived assets and goodwill were further impaired.  As a result, at December 31, 2013 we recorded an additional $6.1 million impairment charge related to the long lived assets and a $0.5 million impairment charge related to goodwill which reduced the carrying value of the goodwill to zero.

Other Operating Income, Net.  We recorded other operating income of $0.7$2.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20142017 compared to $3.5$1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2013.2016. The net amounts for both years consist primarily of net gains recorded on the sales of certain fixed assets and non-strategic exploration properties. The 2017 amount includes approximately $0.1 million related to the $1.0 million lease option extension payment received from Hecla.  The lease option extension payment has been recorded as Deferred Revenue and is being amortized to Other Operating Income on a straight-line basis from August 2, 2017 through December 31, 2020.

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization.  During the year ended December 31, 20142017 we incurred depreciation, depletion and amortization expense of $3.1$1.0 million compared to $6.9$1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Depreciation, depletion and amortization includes a $0.6 million write down of finished goods inventory to estimated net realizable value at December 31, 2014. There was no write down of finished goods inventory at December 31, 2013.2016. The decrease in depreciation, depletion and amortization in 2014expense during the 2017 period is primarily the result of the impairment of long lived assetscertain equipment at theour Velardeña Properties during 2013 which resulted in a significant decrease in the carrying value of property, plant and equipment.having been fully depreciated or sold.

 

Interest and Other Income.expense.  During the year ended December 31, 20142016 we recorded approximately $1.7$0.5 million of interest and other income primarilyexpense related to the reduction of a loss contingency liability related to foreign withholding taxes that the government could assert are owed by the Company, acting as withholding agent, on certain interest payments made to a third party. We recorded interestSentient Loan.  The remaining Sentient Loan was fully converted in June 2016 and other income of $0.4 million forat December 31, 2016 and 2017 we had no outstanding debt.  For the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily related to this loss contingency liability.2017 we did not record any interest expense.

 

WarrantInterest and Other Income. During the year ended December 31, 20142017 we recorded only a nil amount of interest and other income.  During the year ended December 31, 2016 we recorded approximately $1.8$0.4 million of interest and other income which included a refund of previously paid social security taxes in Mexico of approximately $0.4 million. 

Warrant loss.  For the year ended December 31, 2016 we recorded approximately $1.7 million of loss related to a decreasean increase in the fair value of the liability recorded for warrants to acquire the Company’s stock (see Note 15 of our consolidated financial statements filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K).stock. The warrant liability has beenwas recorded at fair value as of December 31, 20142016 based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  The valuation model takes into accountmethod is discussed in detail in Note 13 of our consolidated financial statements. We did not record any warrant derivative gains or losses during 2017 following a change in accounting principle and the probability that the Company could issue additional shares in a future transaction at a lower price than the current exercise pricesubsequent reclassification of the warrants.  Significant inputswarrant liabilities to equity retroactively to the valuation model includedbeginning of 2017 (see Note 3 to the Company’s closing stock price atconsolidated financial statements filed as part of this Form 10-K).

Derivative Loss.    For the year ended December 31, 20142016 we recorded a $0.8 million loss related to the fair value adjustment to the beneficial conversion feature of $0.54, the exercise prices for the warrants disclosed inSentient Note 15(as defined herein), which constitutes an imbedded derivative (see Note 10 of our consolidated financial statements filed as part of this Form 10-K). There were no such

55


amounts recorded for the Company’s stock volatilityyear ended December 31, 2017 as the Sentient Note was fully converted and no longer outstanding as of 90%, the applicable risk free interest rate of 1.6%, and the probability of an additional issuance of the Company’s common stock at a lower price than the current warrant exercise price.September 30, 2016.

 

Gain (Loss) on Foreign Currency.  We recorded a $0.1 million foreign currency gain forloss in each of the yearyears ended December 31, 2014 compared to a $0.6 million foreign currency loss for the year ended December 31, 2013.2017 and 2016. Foreign currency gains and losses are primarily related to the effect of currency fluctuations on monetary assets net of liabilities held by our foreign subsidiaries that are denominated in currencies other than US dollars.

 

Income Taxes.  We recorded $13,000 of income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 related to a Mexican subsidiary.  We recorded no income tax expense or benefit for the year ended December 31, 2014.  For the year ended December 31, 2013 we recorded an income tax benefit of $49.7 million primarily related to the impairment of long lived assets during the year.2016.

 

39



Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

At December 31, 20142017, our aggregate cash and cash equivalents totaled $8.6 million.  With the cash balance at December 31, 2014 and the assumptions described below we expect to have sufficient funding to continue our long term business strategy through 2015, ending 2015 with a cash balance of approximately $2.0 million.  Our cash and cash equivalents balance at December 31, 2014 of $8.6$3.3 million, is $10.5$0.7 million lowerhigher than the $19.1$2.6 million in similar assets held at December 31, 2013 due primarily to negative operating margin (defined as revenues less costs of sales) at the Velardeña Properties of $1.4 million; expenditures of $3.6 million on the restart of mining activities and plant capital and repairs at our Velardeña Properties; $2.5 million in care and maintenance and $1.0 million in drilling costs at our Velardeña Properties; $4.5 million in other exploration expenditures; $1.6 million in maintenance and property holding costs at the El Quevar project;  and $4.6 million in general and administrative expenses; offset in part by2016. The net proceeds of $7.4 million receivedincrease resulted from the sale of shares of our common stockfollowing expenditures and warrants through an underwritten registered offering and concurrent private placement; $1.0cash inflows for the year ended December 31, 2017.  Expenditures totaled $9.0 million in proceeds received from the sale of non-strategic property interests; and a reduction in working capital and other items of $0.3 million primarily related to collections of VAT receivables in Mexico and an increase in accounts payable for expenditures associated with the restart of mining activities at the Velardeña Properties.following:

 

·

$3.1 million in exploration expenditures, including costs related to drilling at the Santa Maria and Mogotes properties;

With

·

$1.6million in care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties;

·

$0.8 million in evaluation activities, care and maintenance and property holding costs at the El Quevar project; and

·

$3.5 million in general and administrative expenses.

The foregoing expenditures were offset by cash inflows of $9.7 million from the following:

·

$4.5 million of net operating margin received pursuant to the oxide plant lease (defined as oxide plant lease revenue less oxide plant lease costs);

·

$1.9 million from Hecla comprised of $1.0 million for an option to extend the oxide plant lease for an additional period of up to two years and $1.0 million for the purchase of 1.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock issued at a price of $0.55 per share, less $0.1 million in legal and stock exchange issuance costs;

·

$1.1 million in refunds of previous VAT payments made in Argentina during 2012 and 2013;

·

$0.8 million from final payments related to the sale of excess mining equipment to Minera Indé;

·

$0.7 million of net proceeds received from the issuance of our common stock under the ATM Program;

·

$0.5 million from the farm out of certain nonstrategic mineral claims to Santacruz;

·

$0.2 million of net proceeds from the sale of other nonstrategic exploration properties and mining equipment.

In addition to our $3.3 million cash balance at December 31, 2014 of $8.62017, during 2018 we expect to receive approximately $4.6 million and a positivein net operating margin from the lease of $2.5the oxide plant and $0.7 million from the Velardeña Properties for the full year 2015, assuming metals pricesSantacruz

56


·Approximately $0.3 million for sustaining capital for the Velardeña Properties;

·Approximately $1.0 million at the El Quevar project to fund ongoing maintenance activities and property holding costs;

·Approximately $3.0 million on other exploration activities and property holding costs related to the Company’s portfolio of exploration properties located primarily in Mexico; and

·Approximately $4.5 million on general and administrative costs and $0.3Zacatecas farm out.  In addition, subsequent to December 31, 2017 we received $1.0 million in increased working capital primarily relatednet proceeds from an amendment to the build-upfarm out agreement of inventories and accounts receivable at the Velardeña Properties.

In arriving at our forecast forCelaya property to Electrum. If no additional sales of common stock under the ATM Program occur, we project we would end 2018 with a cash balance of $2.0$1.5 million atbased on the end of 2015 we assumed a price for silver and gold of $17.00 and $1,250 per ounce, respectively.  For the full year 2015, a 10 percent change in the price per ounce of silver would have a $0.9 million impact (positive or negative) on our cash balance at the end of 2015.  A 10 percent change in the price per ounce of gold would have a $0.7 million impact (positive or negative) on our cash balance at the end of 2015.following forecasted expenditures during 2018.

·

Approximately $2.0 million on exploration activities and property holding costs related to our portfolio of exploration properties located primarily in Mexico, including project assessment and evaluation costs relating to Santa Maria, Yoquivo, and other properties;

·

Approximately $1.5 million at the Velardeña Properties for care and maintenance;

·

Approximately $1.0 million at the El Quevar project to fund ongoing exploration and evaluation activities, care and maintenance and property holding costs;

·

Approximately $3.4 million on general and administrative costs; and

·

Approximately $0.2 on other working capital.

 

The actual amount of cash that we spend through year end 2015receive or the expenditures that we incur during 2018 and the projected year end cash balancebalances at December 31, 2018 may vary significantly from the amounts specified above and will depend on a number of factors, including unexpectedvariations from anticipated care and maintenance costs associated with mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties and the results ofcosts for continued exploration, project assessment, workand development at our other exploration properties. Despite projections of positive net cash flow by mid-2015properties, including Santa Maria, Yoquivo, and El Quevar. Moreover, if revenues from our oxide plant lease or payments from the Velardeñexploration farm out agreement are less than anticipated, we may reduce our planned expenditures accordingly.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a Properties at metals prices of $17.00 per ounce of silvergoing concern basis under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and $1,250 per ounce of gold, our projected cash balance at the end of 2015 would not be sufficient to provide adequate reservessatisfy its liabilities in the eventnormal course of decreasing metals prices, interruptionsbusiness.  However, our continuing long-term operations are dependent upon our ability to secure sufficient funding and to generate future profitable operations.  The underlying value and recoverability of the amounts shown as property, plant and equipment in our consolidated financial statements are dependent on our ability to generate positive cash flows from operations and to continue to fund exploration and development activities that would lead to profitable mining and processing at the Velardeña Propertiesactivities or to adequately pursue further explorationgenerate proceeds from the disposition of our properties in Mexico, requiring us to seek additional funding from equity or debt or from monetization of non-core assets.property, plant and equipment.  There can be no assurance that we wouldwill be successful in obtaining sufficientgenerating future profitable operations or securing additional funding from any of these actions or sources in the future on terms acceptable to us or at all.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Cash costs, net  We believe the continuing cash flow from the lease of by-product credits, per payable ouncethe oxide plant and prior asset dispositions make it probable that we will have sufficient cash to meet our financial obligations and continue our business strategy beyond one year from the filing of silver is a non GAAPour consolidated financial measure that is widely used in the mining industry. Under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), there is no standardized definition of cash cost, net of by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver, and therefore the Company’s forecasted cash costs may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies.

Forecasted cash costs for the Velardeña Properties were calculated based on the mining plan, and include all forecasted direct and indirect costs associated with the physical activities that would generate concentrate products for sale to customers, including mining to gain access to mineralized materials, mining of mineralized materials and waste, milling, third-party related treatment, refining and transportation costs, on-site administrative costs and royalties. Forecasted cash costs do not include depreciation, depletion, amortization, exploration expenditures, reclamation and remediation costs, sustaining capital, financing costs, income taxes, or corporate general and administrative costs not directly or indirectly related to the Velardeña Properties. By-product credits include forecasted revenues from gold, lead and zinc contained in the products sold to customers. Cash costs, after by-product credits, were divided by the quantity of payable silver forecastedstatements for the period to arrive at cash costs, after by-product credits, per payable ounce of silver. Cost of sales is the most comparable financial measure, calculated in accordance with GAAP, to cash costs. As compared toended December 31, 2017.  

 

40



cash costs, cost of sales includes adjustments for changes in inventory and excludes net revenue from by-products and third-party related treatment, refining and transportation costs, which are reported as part of revenue in accordance with GAAP.

We provide cash costs, after by-product credits to provide additional information regarding the performance of the Velardeña Properties, and believe the use of this measure provides investors with useful information about the underlying costs of our mining activities. Cash costs, after by-product credits, is an important statistic that the Company uses to measure the Velardeña Properties’ performance. It also allows us to benchmark the performance of the Velardeña Properties against those operations of our competitors. The statistic is also useful in identifying acquisition and investment opportunities since it provides a common tool for measuring the financial performance of other mines with varying geologic, metallurgical and mining and processing characteristics.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The selection and application of accounting policies is an important process that has developed as our business activities have evolved and as the accounting rules have changed. Accounting rules generally do not involve a selection among alternatives, but involve an implementation and interpretation of existing rules, and the use of judgment, to the specific set of circumstances existing in our business. Discussed below are the accounting policies that we believe are critical to our financial statements due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liability, revenue or expense being reported.

 

Mineral Reserves

 

When and if we determine that a mineral property has proven and probable reserves, subsequent development costs are capitalized to mineral properties. When mineral properties are developed and operations commence, capitalized

57


costs are charged to operations using the units-of-production method over proven and probable reserves. “Mineralized material” as used in this annual report, although permissible under SEC’s Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by SEC standards, and therefore all development costs incurred by us are expensed when incurred. The Company cannot be certain that any part of the deposits at the Velardeña Properties or the Yaxtché deposit at the El Quevar project will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves”.

 

Asset Retirement Obligations

 

We record asset retirement obligations in accordance with Auditing Standards Codification (“ASC”) 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (“ASC 410”), which establishes a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. According to ASC 410, the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. An offsetting asset retirement cost is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets with which it is associated, and depreciated over the useful life of the asset.

 

Long Lived Assets and Goodwill

 

We assessLong lived assets are recorded at cost and per the guidance of ASC 360 the Company assesses the recoverability of ourits long lived assets, including goodwill, at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be impaired.  The significant decrease in metals prices during 2013 andrecoverable.  If the shutdownsum of mining and processing atestimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis is less than the Velardeña Properties during June 2013 were events that required an assessmentcarrying amount of the recoverabilityrelated asset, impairment is considered to exist. The related impairment loss is measured by comparing estimated future net cash flows on a discounted basis or by comparing other market indicators to the carrying amount of the Velardeña Properties asset group and goodwill.  We completed an impairment analysis using a market valuation approach which relies upon assumptions related to the Velardeña Properties asset group in comparison to other corroborated observable market data.  At June 30, 2013 we determined that both the long lived assets and the goodwill associated with the Velardeña Properties and the San Diego property were impaired.  As a result at June 30, 2013 we recorded a $237.8 million impairment charge related to the long lived assets and an $11.2 million impairment charge related to goodwill.  At December 31, 2013 we reviewed the remaining carrying value of the long lived assets and goodwill based on the corroborated observable market data at that date and determined that the long lived assets and goodwill were further impaired.  As a result, at December 31, 2013 we recorded an additional $6.1 million impairment charge related to the long lived assets and a $0.5 million impairment charge related to goodwill which reduced the carrying value of the goodwill to zero.asset.

 

Table of Contractual Obligations

 

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2014:2017:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

 

    

More

 

 

 

 

Less Than

 

1 - 3

 

3 - 5

 

Than

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Total

 

Less Than
1 Year

 

1 - 3
Years

 

3 - 5
Years

 

More
Than
5 Years

 

 

Total

 

1 Year

 

Years

 

Years

 

5 Years

 

 

(in thousands of $)

 

 

(in thousands of $)

 

Operating leases(1)

 

1,254

 

270

 

490

 

493

 

 

 

567

 

293

 

274

 

 —

 

 —

 

El Quevar and Velardeña concession payments(2)

 

610

 

122

 

244

 

244

 

(3)

 

940

 

188

 

376

 

376

 

(3)


(1)

The operating lease obligations are related to our corporate headquarters office in Golden, Colorado, which expires November 30, 2019, as well as another office lease associated with our Velardeña Properties.

(2)

In 2018 and subsequent years, we expect to make annual maintenance payments of approximately $70,000 to the Mexico federal government to maintain the Velardeña Properties concessions and $25,000 to maintain related surface rights under a contract with the local community ejido.  In 2018 and subsequent years, we expect to payapproximately $93,000 per year to the Argentina federal government in order to maintain our El Quevar concessions.

 

41


58



 

(1)The operating lease obligations are related to our corporate headquarters office in Golden, Colorado, as well as another office lease associated with our Velardeña Properties. The lease for the corporate headquarters office space was renegotiated and extended during the first quarter 2014. The new lease reflects an approximately 46% reduction in space and an approximately 44% reduction in cost beginning March 1, 2014. The new lease expires November 30, 2019. The lease for the Velardeña Properties office expires in 2015.

(2)We make annual maintenance payments of approximately $12,000 to the Mexico federal government to maintain the Velardeña Properties concessions and approximately $35,000 to the Argentine federal government to maintain the El Quevar project concessions. In 2015 and subsequent years, we expect to pay approximately $110,000 per year to the Argentina federal government as a result of an amendment to the National Mining Code effective January 2015, increasing the annual payment by approximately four times. These payments include payments for both owned concessions and concessions held under purchase option agreements.

(3)We cannot currently estimate the life of the Velardeña Properties or El Quevar project. This table assumes that no annual maintenance payments will be made more than five years after December 31, 2014. If we continue mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties beyond five years, we expect that we would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $12,000 per year for the life of the Velardeña mine. If we continue to construct a mine at the El Quevar project, we expect that we would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $110,000 per year for the life of the El Quevar mine.

(3)

We cannot currently estimate the life of the Velardeña Properties or El Quevar project. This table assumes that no annual maintenance payments will be made more than five years after December 31, 2017. If we continue to hold the Velardeña Properties concessions beyond five years, we expect that we would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $70,000 per year for the life of the Velardeña Properties concessions. If we continue to hold the El Quevar concessions beyond five years, we expect that we would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $93,000 per year for the life of the El Quevar concessions.

 

From time to time we enter into lease or option agreements related to exploration properties that are of interest to us. These agreements typically contain escalating payments required to maintain our exploration rights to the property. Such agreements are not included in the above table because exploration success is historically low and we have the right to terminate the agreements at any time. For example, at the El Quevar project we control the Nevado I concession pursuant to a purchase option agreement with a third party concession owner. Our remaining payment on the Nevado I option agreement totals $550,000 and has been extended to June, 2015.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off balanceoff-balance sheet arrangements.

 

ITEM 7A:  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Interest Rate Risk

 

We invest substantially all of our excess cash with high credit-quality financial institutions or in U.S. government and debt securities rated “investment grade” or better. The rates received on such investments may fluctuate with changes in economic conditions. Based on the average cash, restricted cash, investments and restricted investment balances outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, a 1.0% decrease in interest rates would have resulted in a reduction in interest income for the period of less than approximately $0.1 million.

 

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

 

Although most of our expenditures are in U.S. dollars, certain purchases of labor, supplies and capital assets are denominated in other currencies. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact the costs of our mining and exploration activities. To reduce this risk, we maintain minimum cash balances in foreign currencies and complete most of our purchases in U.S. dollars.

 

42



Commodity Price Risk

 

We are primarily engaged in the exploration and mining of properties containing silver, gold, zinc, lead and other minerals. As a result, decreases in the price of any of these metals have the potential to negatively impact our ability to establish reserves and mine on our properties. For further detail regarding the effect on our expected cash flow from fluctuations in silver and gold prices, see “Item 7: Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Liquidity and Capital Resources” above.

 

ITEM 8:  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The consolidated financial statements and supplementary information filed as part of this Item 8 are listed under Part IV, Item 15, “Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules” and contained in this annual report on Form 10-K at page F-1.

59


ITEM 9:  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

 

None.

 

ITEM 9A:  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

The management of Golden Minerals Company has evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2014.2017.

 

Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2014,2017, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) were effective and designed to provide reasonable assurance that (i) information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and (ii) information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

 

The management of Golden Minerals, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

 

Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

 

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment, management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2014,2017, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on these criteria.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarteryear ended December 31, 20142017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B:  OTHER INFORMATION

 

None.

60


43



PART III

 

ITEM 10:  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

For Information regarding our executive officers, see Items“Items 1 and 2: Business and Properties—Executive Officers of Golden MineralsMinerals” and Items“Items 1 and 2: Business and Properties—Board of Directors of Golden Minerals.Minerals.

 

Additional information is incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all of our employees, including the principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, and those of our officers performing similar functions. The full text of our code of ethics can be found on the Corporate Governance page on our website. In the event our Board of Directors approves an amendment to or waiver from any provision of our code of ethics, we will disclose the required information pertaining to such amendment or waiver on our website.

 

ITEM 11:  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

ITEM 12:  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

ITEM 13:  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

ITEM 14:  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

 

Incorporated by reference from the information in our proxy statement for the 20152018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which we will file with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the end of the fiscal year to which this report relates.

 

61


PART IV

 

ITEM 15:  EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

a.

Documents filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference:

(1)

Our consolidated financial statements are listed on the “Index to Financial Statements” on Page F-1 to this report.

(2)

Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements or related notes).

(3)

The following exhibits are filed with this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference.

62


ITEM 16: PREPARATION OF STATEMENT OR REPORT

Not applicable

 

(a)Documents filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference:EXHIBITS

 

(1)Our consolidated financial statements are listed on the “Index to Financial Statements” on Page F-1 to this report.

(2)Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because they are either not required, are not applicable, or the required information is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements or related notes).

(3)The following exhibits are filed with this annual report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference.

44



EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number

Description

1.1

 

Underwriting Agreement between Golden Minerals Company and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC dated as of September 13, 2012.(1)

Exhibit
Number

Description

 

 

 

1.2

3.1

 

Underwriting Agreement betweenAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company and Roth Capital Partners, LLC, dated as of September 5, 2014.(13)Company.(2)

 

 

 

3.1

3.2

 

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company.(2)

3.2

First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company.(3)

 

 

 

3.3

 

BylawsSecond Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Golden Minerals Company.(2) (17)

 

 

 

4.1

3.4

 

SpecimenBylaws of Common Stock Certificate.(4)Golden Minerals Company.(2)

 

 

 

4.2

4.1

 

Supplemental Warrant Indenture, dated asSpecimen of September 2, 2011, by and among Golden Minerals, ECU Silver Mining Inc., and Computershare, including Form of WarrantCommon Stock Certificate.(3)(4)

 

 

 

4.3

4.2

 

Third Supplemental Warrant Indenture, dated as of September 2, 2011, by and among Golden Minerals, ECU Silver Mining Inc., and Computershare, including Form of Bilingual Warrant Certificate.(3)

4.4

Warrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A. dated as of September 19, 2012.2012, as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of March 7, 2014, as further amended by Amendment No. 2 dated as of May 2, 2016.(1) (16)

 

 

 

4.5

4.3

 

Warrant by and between Golden Minerals Company and Sentient Global Resources Fund IV, L.P. dated as of September 19, 2012.(1)

 

 

 

4.6

4.4

 

Warrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A. dated as of September 10, 2014 (Public Offering). (13)(11)

 

 

 

4.7

4.5

 

Warrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A. dated as of September 10, 2014 (Sentient Private Placement). (14), as amended by Amendment No. 1 dated as of May 2, 2016. (12) (16)

 

 

 

10.1

4.6

 

FormWarrant Agreement by and between Golden Minerals Company and Computershare Trust Company N.A., dated as of Indemnification Agreement.(2)May 6, 2016. (16)

 

 

 

10.2

10.1

 

Form of Change of ControlIndemnification Agreement.(2)

 

 

 

10.3

10.2

 

Amendment No. 1 toForm of Change of Control Agreement.(5)(2)

 

 

 

10.4

10.3

 

Golden Minerals Company Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.(6)Amendment No. 1 to Change of Control Agreement.(5)

 

 

 

10.4

10.5

Golden Minerals Company Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan.(6)

63



64



(1)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 19, 2012.

 

(2)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 30, 2009.

(3)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 9, 2011.

(4)

Incorporated by reference to our Form S-1/A Registration Statement filed November 16, 2009.

65


(5)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 28, 2013.

(1)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 19, 2012.

(6)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2014.

(7)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 10, 2009.

(8)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 4, 2010.

(9)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 11, 2011.

(10)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 18, 2013.

(11)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 10, 2014.

(12)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2014.

(13)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 20, 2015.

(14)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 18, 2015.

(15)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 18, 2016.

(16)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2016.

(17)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 20, 2016.

(18)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 14, 2016.

(19)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 5, 2016.

(20)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 11, 2016.

(21)

Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2016.

(22)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 20, 2016.

(23)

Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 3, 2017.

*     Filed herewith.

**   Furnished herewith.

 

(2)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 30, 2009.

66


 

(3)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 9, 2011.Table of Contents

(4)Incorporated by reference to our Form S-1/A Registration Statement filed November 16, 2009.

(5)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 28, 2013.

(6)Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2014.

(7)Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 10, 2009.

(8)Incorporated by reference to our Form S-8 Registration Statement filed September 2, 2011.

(9)Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 4, 2010.

(10)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 11, 2011.

(11)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 18, 2013.

(12)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 15, 2013.

(13)Incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 10, 2014.

(14)Incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2014.

*Filed herewith.

**Furnished herewith.

46



SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Dated: February 27, 2015March 1, 2018

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

Registrant

 

Registrant

 

 

 

By:

/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGERWARREN M. REHN

 

 

Jeffrey G. ClevengerWarren M. Rehn

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Signature

Title

Date

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGERWARREN M. REHN

 

President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chairman of the Board of Directors

 

February 27, 2015March 1, 2018

Jeffrey G. ClevengerWarren M. Rehn

 

(Principal Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ ROBERT P. VOGELS

 

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal

March 1, 2018

Robert P. Vogels

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

 

February 27, 2015

Robert P. Vogels

/s/ JEFFREY G. CLEVENGER

Chairman of the Board of Directors

March 1, 2018

Jeffrey G. Clevenger

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ W. DURAND EPPLER

 

Director

 

February 27, 2015March 1, 2018

W.DurandW. Durand Eppler

/s/ MICHAEL T. MASON

Director

February 27, 2015

Michael T. Mason

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ IAN MASTERTON-HUME

 

Director

 

February 27, 2015March 1, 2018

Ian Masterton-Hume

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ KEVIN R. MORANO

 

Director

 

February 27, 2015March 1, 2018

Kevin R. Morano

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ TERRY M. PALMER

 

Director

 

February 27, 2015March 1, 2018

Terry M. Palmer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ ANDREW N. PULLAR

 

Director

 

February 27, 2015March 1, 2018

Andrew N. Pullar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ DAVID H. WATKINS

 

Director

 

February 27, 2015March 1, 2018

David H. Watkins

 

 

 

 

 

47



 

67



 

F-1


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders

Golden Minerals Company

Golden, Colorado

 

OPINION ON THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Golden Minerals Company and subsidiaries (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each year in the years then ended.  The Company’s management is responsibletwo‑year period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for theseeach year in the two‑year period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

BASIS FOR OPINION

These financial statements.statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company's financial statements based on our audits.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform our auditsthe audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. OurAs part of our audits included considerationwe are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Golden Minerals Company and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

/s/ EKS&H LLLP

March 1, 2018

Denver, Colorado

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013.

 

 

February 27, 2015

Denver, Colorado

F-2


 


GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

(in thousands, except share data)

 

 

(in thousands, except share data)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (Note 3)

 

$

8,579

 

$

19,146

 

Trade receivables

 

 

25

 

Inventories (Note 5)

 

1,497

 

449

 

Value added tax receivable (Note 6)

 

1,316

 

1,765

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets (Note 4)

 

835

 

1,091

 

Cash and cash equivalents (Note 4)

 

$

3,250

 

$

2,588

 

Short-term investments (Note 4)

 

 

238

 

 

334

 

Lease receivables

 

 

314

 

 

380

 

Inventories, net (Note 6)

 

 

242

 

 

245

 

Value added tax receivable, net (Note 7)

 

 

148

 

 

 5

 

Related party receivable (Note 23)

 

 

 —

 

 

643

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets (Note 5)

 

 

745

 

 

578

 

Total current assets

 

12,227

 

22,476

 

 

 

4,937

 

 

4,773

 

Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 7)

 

29,031

 

32,375

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets (Note 4)

 

 

30

 

Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 8)

 

 

8,140

 

 

9,235

 

Total assets

 

$

41,258

 

$

54,881

 

 

$

13,077

 

$

14,008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities (Note 10)

 

$

1,639

 

$

1,365

 

Other current liabilities (Note 12)

 

2,551

 

4,405

 

Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities (Note 9)

 

$

1,556

 

$

1,224

 

Deferred revenue, current (Note 16)

 

 

293

 

 

 —

 

Other current liabilities

 

 

 9

 

 

24

 

Total current liabilities

 

4,190

 

5,770

 

 

 

1,858

 

 

1,248

 

Asset retirement and reclamation liabilities (Note 11)

 

2,685

 

2,602

 

 

 

2,495

 

 

2,434

 

Warrant liability (Note 15)

 

1,554

 

 

Other long term liabilities (Note 12)

 

95

 

53

 

Deferred revenue, non-current (Note 16)

 

 

600

 

 

 —

 

Warrant liability - related party (Note 13)

 

 

 —

 

 

976

 

Warrant liability (Note 13)

 

 

 —

 

 

922

 

Other long term liabilities

 

 

43

 

 

66

 

Total liabilities

 

8,524

 

8,425

 

 

 

4,996

 

 

5,646

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 20)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity (Note 15)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 53,162,833 and 43,530,833 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

532

 

435

 

Common stock, $.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 91,929,709 and 89,020,041 shares issued and outstanding, respectively

 

 

919

 

 

889

 

Additional paid in capital

 

484,197

 

494,647

 

 

 

516,284

 

 

495,455

 

Accumulated deficit

 

(451,995

)

(448,626

)

 

 

(509,082)

 

 

(488,037)

 

Shareholders’ equity

 

32,734

 

46,456

 

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

 

 

(40)

 

 

55

 

Shareholders' equity

 

 

8,081

 

 

8,362

 

Total liabilities and equity

 

$

41,258

 

$

54,881

 

 

$

13,077

 

$

14,008

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3


GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

  

2017

  

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide plant lease (Note 16)

 

$

6,691

 

$

6,400

 

Total revenue

 

 

6,691

 

 

6,400

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Oxide plant lease costs (Note 16)

 

 

(2,189)

 

 

(2,046)

 

Exploration expense

 

 

(3,091)

 

 

(3,718)

 

El Quevar project expense

 

 

(822)

 

 

(508)

 

Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance costs

 

 

(1,589)

 

 

(2,016)

 

Administrative expense

 

 

(3,512)

 

 

(3,890)

 

Stock based compensation

 

 

(296)

 

 

(593)

 

Reclamation expense

 

 

(196)

 

 

(192)

 

Other operating income, net (Notes 7 and 8)

 

 

2,093

 

 

1,790

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

(952)

 

 

(1,548)

 

Total costs and expenses

 

 

(10,554)

 

 

(12,721)

 

Loss from operations

 

 

(3,863)

 

 

(6,321)

 

Other income and (expense):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense (Note 10)

 

 

 —

 

 

(515)

 

Interest and other income (Note 17)

 

 

37

 

 

390

 

Warrant derivative loss (Notes 3 and 18)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,688)

 

Derivative loss (Note 18)

 

 

 —

 

 

(778)

 

Loss on debt extinguishment (Note 10)

 

 

 —

 

 

(1,653)

 

Loss on foreign currency

 

 

(53)

 

 

(94)

 

Total other income (expense)

 

 

(16)

 

 

(4,338)

 

Loss from operations before income taxes

 

 

(3,879)

 

 

(10,659)

 

Income tax expense

 

 

(13)

 

 

 —

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,892)

 

$

(10,659)

 

Comprehensive loss, net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized (loss) gain on securities

 

 

(95)

 

 

182

 

Comprehensive loss

 

$

(3,987)

 

$

(10,477)

 

Net loss per common share — basic

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss

 

$

(0.04)

 

$

(0.13)

 

Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - basic (1)

 

 

90,468,606

 

 

81,651,896

 


(1)

Potentially dilutive shares have not been included because to do so would be anti-dilutive

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4


GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

Comprehensive

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Deficit

 

Income (loss)

 

Equity

 

 

 

(in thousands except share data)

 

Balance, December 31, 2015

 

53,335,333

 

$

534

 

$

484,742

 

$

(477,378)

 

$

(127)

 

$

7,771

 

Stock compensation accrued and shares issued for vested stock awards

 

317,968

 

 

 2

 

 

250

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

252

 

Shares issued on conversion of Sentient Note (Note 10)

 

27,366,740

 

 

273

 

 

6,944

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

7,217

 

Registered offering common stock, net and warrants (Note 15)

 

8,000,000

 

 

80

 

 

3,519

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

3,599

 

Unrealized gain on marketable equity securities, net of tax

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

182

 

 

182

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(10,659)

 

 

 —

 

 

(10,659)

 

Balance, December 31, 2016

 

89,020,041

 

$

889

 

$

495,455

 

$

(488,037)

 

$

55

 

$

8,362

 

Cumulative adjustment related to change in accounting principle (Note 3)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

19,046

 

 

(17,148)

 

 

 —

 

 

1,898

 

Adjusted balance at January 1, 2017

 

89,020,041

 

$

889

 

$

514,501

 

$

(505,185)

 

$

55

 

$

10,260

 

Stock compensation accrued and shares issued for vested stock awards

 

200,000

 

 

 1

 

 

196

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

197

 

Shares issued under the at-the-market offering agreement, net (Note 15)

 

1,024,392

 

 

10

 

 

671

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

681

 

Consideration shares sold to Hecla, net (Notes 15 and 16)

 

1,811,015

 

 

18

 

 

912

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

930

 

Cancellation of treasury shares (Note 15)

 

(125,739)

 

 

 1

 

 

(1)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Deemed dividend on warrants (Note 3)

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 5

 

 

(5)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Unrealized loss on marketable equity securities, net of tax

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(95)

 

 

(95)

 

Net loss

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,892)

 

 

 —

 

 

(3,892)

 

Balance, December 31, 2017

 

91,929,709

 

$

919

 

$

516,284

 

$

(509,082)

 

$

(40)

 

$

8,081

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5


GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities (Note 19)

 

$

(1,630)

 

$

(6,205)

 

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

 

762

 

 

1,167

 

Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment

 

 

(81)

 

 

(50)

 

Net cash from investing activities

 

$

681

 

$

1,117

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

 

 

1,611

 

 

3,599

 

Net cash from financing activities

 

$

1,611

 

$

3,599

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 

 

662

 

 

(1,489)

 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

 

2,588

 

 

4,077

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

3,250

 

$

2,588

 

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

F-3


F-6



 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

The Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands except per share data)

 

Revenue:

 

 

 

 

 

Sale of metals (Note 16)

 

$

235

 

$

10,680

 

Costs and expenses:

 

 

 

 

 

Cost of metals sold (exclusive of depreciation shown below) (Note 16)

 

(1,655

)

(17,534

)

Exploration expense

 

(5,528

)

(4,575

)

El Quevar project expense

 

(1,597

)

(2,628

)

Velardeña project expense

 

(3,126

)

(3,052

)

Velardeña shutdown and care & maitntenance costs

 

(2,457

)

(6,374

)

Administrative expense

 

(4,642

)

(5,610

)

Stock based compensation

 

(926

)

(1,555

)

Reclamation expense

 

(199

)

(184

)

Impairment of long lived assets (Note 8)

 

 

(243,985

)

Impairment of goodwill (Note 9)

 

 

(11,666

)

Other operating income, net

 

691

 

3,526

 

Depreciation, depletion and amortization

 

(3,128

)

(6,927

)

Total costs and expenses

 

(22,567

)

(300,564

)

Loss from operations

 

(22,332

)

(289,884

)

Other income and (expenses):

 

 

 

 

 

Interest and other income (Note 17)

 

1,708

 

444

 

Warrant derivative income (Note 18)

 

1,693

 

 

Gain (loss) on foreign currency

 

108

 

(626

)

Other total income and (expenses)

 

3,509

 

(182

)

Loss before income taxes

 

(18,823

)

(290,066

)

Income taxes benefit (Note 14)

 

 

49,686

 

Net loss

 

$

(18,823

)

$

(240,380

)

Other comprehensive gain:

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gain on securities, net of tax

 

$

 

$

90

 

Comprehensive loss

 

$

(18,823

)

$

(240,290

)

Net loss per common share — basic and diluted

 

 

 

 

 

Loss

 

$

(0.41

)

$

(5.61

)

Weighted average Common Stock outstanding - basic and diluted

 

45,862,419

 

42,838,735

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

Common Stock

 

Paid-in

 

Accumulated

 

income

 

Total

 

 

 

Shares

 

Amount

 

Capital

 

Deficit

 

(loss)

 

Equity

 

 

 

(in thousands except share data)

 

Balance, December 31, 2012

 

43,265,833

 

$

433

 

$

493,175

 

$

(208,246

)

$

(90

)

$

285,272

 

Stock compensation accrued

 

265,000

 

2

 

1,553

 

 

 

1,555

 

KELTIP mark-to-market

 

 

 

(81

)

 

 

(81

)

Realized gain on marketable equity securities, net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

90

 

90

 

Net loss

 

 

 

 

(240,380

)

 

(240,380

)

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

43,530,833

 

$

435

 

$

494,647

 

$

(448,626

)

$

 

$

46,456

 

Stock compensation accrued

 

140,000

 

2

 

924

 

 

 

926

 

KELTIP mark-to-market

 

 

 

12

 

 

 

12

 

Registered offering stock units, net (Note 15)

 

3,692,000

 

37

 

1,502

 

 

 

1,539

 

Private placements stock units, net (Note 15)

 

5,800,000

 

58

 

2,729

 

 

 

2,787

 

Reclassification to reflect warrant liability (Note 15)

 

 

 

(15,617

)

15,454

 

 

(163

)

Net loss

 

 

 

 

(18,823

)

 

(18,823

)

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

53,162,833

 

$

532

 

$

484,197

 

$

(451,995

)

$

 

$

32,734

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

The Years Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities (Note 19)

 

$

(18,459

)

$

(27,878

)

Cash flows from (used in) investing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Sale of available-for-sale investments

 

 

198

 

Proceeds from sale of assets

 

982

 

4,217

 

Additions to property, plant and equipment

 

(500

)

(1,797

)

Net cash from investing activities

 

482

 

2,618

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issue costs

 

7,410

 

 

Net cash from financing activities

 

7,410

 

 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 

(10,567

)

(25,260

)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

 

19,146

 

44,406

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

 

$

8,579

 

$

19,146

 

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Expressed in United States dollars)

1.Nature of Operations

 

1.Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements

Golden MineralsThe Company (the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, is a mining company, holding a 100% interest in the Velardeña and Chicago precious metals mining properties and associated oxide and sulfide processing plants in Mexico (the “Velardeña Properties”).  TheDuring November 2015 the Company is primarily focused on efforts to optimizesuspended mining and sulfide processing activities at theits Velardeña Properties in order to achieveconserve the asset until the Company is able to develop mining and processing plans that at then current prices for silver and gold indicate a sustainable positive net cash flowsoperating margin (defined as revenues less costs of sales) or the Company is able to locate, acquire and develop alternative mineral sources that could be economically mined and transported to the Velardeña Properties for processing.  The Company expects to incur approximately $0.4 million in quarterly care and maintenance costs at the Velardeña Properties. Properties while mining and processing remain suspended. 

The Company is also focused on establishinghas retained a secondcore group of mining assets, which may include those recently acquired assets inemployees at the Parral District in Chihuahua MexicoVelardeña Properties, most of whom have been assigned to operate and obtaining oxide feed from outside sources to enable restart ofprovide administrative support for the oxide plant, which is leased to a subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company (“Hecla”) and not affected by the shutdown.  The oxide plant began processing material for Hecla in ordermid-December 2015, and the Company received net cash flow under the lease of approximately $4.5 million and $4.4 million in 2017 and 2016 respectively.  During March 2017, Hecla exercised its right to generate sufficient revenue, along with revenue fromextend the lease through December 31, 2018. On August 2, 2017, the Company granted Hecla an option to extend the lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 in exchange for a $1.0 million cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares of the Company’s common stock, issued at a price of $0.55 per share, which was the undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price at the time of sale (see Note 15).   The retained employees also include an exploration group and an operations and administrative group to continue to advance the Company’s plans in Mexico, oversee corporate compliance activities, and to maintain and safeguard the longer term value of the Velardeña Properties to fund continuing business activities. assets.

The Company is continuing its exploration effortsremains focused on selectedevaluating and searching for mining opportunities in North America (including Mexico) with near term prospects of mining, and particularly for properties in its portfoliowithin reasonable haulage distances of 30 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico. It continues to hold its El Quevar property on care and maintenance and to reduce holding costs until it can find our processing plants at the Velardeña partner to further advance the project.Properties. The Company is also reviewing strategic opportunities, focusing primarily on development or operating properties in North America, including Mexico. The Company is continuing its exploration efforts on selected properties in its portfolio of approximately 10 exploration properties located primarily in Mexico.  The Company is also conducting evaluation activities at its El Quevar advanced exploration property in Argentina and remains open to finding a partner to contribute to the funding of further exploration. 

 

The Company is considered an exploration stage company under the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)SEC as the Company has not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable mineral reserves, as defined by the SEC Industry Guide 7, at the Velardeña Properties, or any of the Company’s other properties.  As a result, and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”)GAAP for exploration stage companies, all expenditures for exploration and evaluation of the Company’s properties are expensed as incurred. As such the Company’s financial statements may not be comparable to the financial statements of mining companies that do have proven and probable mineral reserves.  Such companies would typically capitalize certain development costs including infrastructure development and mining activities to access the ore. The capitalized costs would be amortized on a units-of-production basis as reserves are mined. The amortized costs are typically allocated to inventory and eventually to cost of sales as the inventories are sold.  As the Company does not have proven and probable reserves, substantially all expenditures at the Company’s Velardeña Properties for mine construction activity, as well as costs associated with the mill facilities, and for items that do not have a readily identifiable market value apart from the mineralized material, have been expensed as incurred. Such costs are charged to cost of metals sold or project expense during the period depending on the nature of the costs. Certain of the costs may be reflected in inventories prior to the sale of the product. The term “mineralized material” as used herein, although permissible under SEC Industry Guide 7, does not indicate “reserves” by

F-7


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

SEC standards. The Company cannot be certain that any deposits at the Velardeña Properties or any other exploration property will ever be confirmed or converted into SEC Industry Guide 7 compliant “reserves”.

 

In June 2013 the Company suspended mining and processing at its Velardeña Properties. Following the shutdown, the Company continued to develop and evaluate plans to restart mining. The Company completed this evaluation and new mine plans in the second quarter 2014 and on July 1, 2014 restarted mining at the Velardeña Properties and began processing material from the mine on November 3, 2014. During 2014 the Company focused primarily on mining material from the San Mateo, Terneras and Roca Negra vein systems. Average grades in November were 109 grams per tonne silver and 1.3 grams per tonne gold, with payable metals generated from the processing facilities of approximately 12,000 ounces silver equivalent ounces, which is exclusive of process inventory in the circuit that required build up.  In December 2014 the mill began operating at nearly full capacity of an average 264 tonnes per day (“tpd”). The Company is continuing to ramp up to the 285 tpd rate, which it expects to achieve late in the first quarter 2015. Average grades in December were 127 grams per tonne silver and 1.8 grams per tonne gold, with payable metals generated from the processing facilities of approximately 31,000 ounces silver equivalent ounces. During the fourth quarter 2014, the Company sold approximately 16,000 ounces of silver and approximately 95 ounces of gold. In the first quarter 2015, the engineering firm Tetra Tech updated the Company’s estimate of mineralized material at the Velardeña Properties, and plans to finalize a Preliminary Economic Assessment (“PEA”) and a technical report pursuant to Canadian National Instrument 43-101 in respect of the Velardeña Properties.

The financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis under which an entity is considered to be able to realize its assets and satisfy its liabilities in the normal course of business.  However, the continuing operations

 

F-7



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

of the Company are dependent upon its ability to secure sufficient funding and to generate future profitable operations.  The underlying value and recoverability of the amounts shown as mineral properties in Note 7 are dependent on the ability of the Company to generate positive cash flows from operations and to continue to fund exploration and development activities that would lead to profitable mining activities or to generate proceeds from the disposition of the mineral properties.  There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in generating future profitable operations or securing additional funding in the future on terms acceptable to the Company or at all.

2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements requirerequires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The more significant areas requiring the use of management estimates and assumptions relate to mineral reservesmineralized material and related future metals prices that are the basis for future cash flow estimates utilized in impairment calculations and units-of-production depreciation, depletion and amortization calculations; environmental reclamation and closure obligations; estimates of recoverable metals in stockpiles; valuation allowances for deferred tax assets and the fair value of financial instruments. The Company based its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ significantly from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

The policies adopted, considered by management to be significant, are summarized as follows:

 

a.Basisa.Basis of consolidation

 

All of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries are 100% owned and as such the Company does not recognizehave a noncontrolling interest in any of its subsidiaries.  All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated at consolidation.

 

b.Translationb.Translation of foreign currencies

 

Substantially all expenditures and sales are made in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, the Company and its subsidiaries use the U.S. dollar as their functional and reporting currency.

 

c.Cashc.Cash and cash equivalents

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

 

d.d.InventoriesInventories

Metals inventory at the Velardeña Properties consisted of marketable products including concentrates and precipitates.  Metals inventory were carried at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.  Net realizable value represents the estimated future sales price of the product based on spot and futures metals prices through estimated sale and settlement dates, less the estimated costs to complete processing and bring the product to sale. Costs included in metals inventory included direct and indirect costs of mining and processing, including depreciation.  At December 31, 2014 the Company had written down its metals inventory to net realizable value with excess costs included in cost of sales and depreciation. The Company did not have any metals inventory at December 31, 2013.

F-8



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

Materials and supplies inventories are valued at the lower of average cost or net realizable value. Cost includes applicable taxes and freight. The Company routinely counts and evaluates its material and supplies to determine the existence of any obsolete stock that is subject to impairment.

 

e.e. Mining properties, exploration and development costs

 

The Company expenses general prospecting costs and the costs of acquiring and exploring unevaluated mineral properties. When a mineral property is determined to have proven and probable reserves, subsequent development costs are capitalized to mineral properties.  For acquired mineral properties with proven and probable reserves, the Company capitalizes acquisition costs and subsequent development costs.  When mineral properties are developed and operations

F-8


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

commence, capitalized costs are charged to operations using the units-of-production method over proven and probable reserves. Upon abandonment or sale of a mineral property, all capitalized costs relating to the specific property are written off in the period abandoned or sold and a gain or loss is recognized in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive loss.Loss.

 

As discussed in Note 1, the Company is considered an exploration stage company under the criteria set forth by the SEC since it has not yet demonstrated the existence of proven or probable reserves at the Velardeña Properties, or any of the Company’s other properties. As such, the Company expenses costs as incurred related to theany extraction of mineralized material at its Velardeña Properties.  The Company established a cost basis for the mineralized material at the Velardeña Properties as a result of purchase accounting for the Company’s business combination transaction with ECU Silver Mining Inc. (“ECU”) in September 2011, the transaction pursuant to which the Company acquired the Velardeña Properties. Mineral properties acquired in the ECU merger were recorded at estimated fair market value based on valuations performed with the assistance of an independent appraisal firm and a minerals engineering company. Although the Company has not demonstrated the existence of proven and probable reserves, and the Company has not completed a pre-feasibility economic assessment, the Company had established the existence of mineralized material that was used in assigning value to mineral properties for purchase accounting purposes. The subsequent extraction of this mineralized material has provided a reasonable basis for the calculation of units-of-production depreciation for the cost basis in the mineral properties.

 

On a quarterly basis the Company evaluates its exploration properties to determine if they meet the Company’s minimum requirements for continued evaluation.  The rights to the properties that do not meet the minimum requirements are relinquished and the carrying values, if any, are written off and reflected in other“Other operating gains and losses, netincome, net” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  Costs of exploration subsequent to the application of fresh start accounting have and will continue to be expensed.

 

f.Property,f.Property, plant and equipment and long lived asset impairment

 

Buildings are depreciated using the straight—straight–line method over the estimated useful lives of 30 to 40 years or the life of the mine whichever is shorter.  Mining equipment and machinery, excluding the plant, are depreciated using the straight-line method over useful lives of three to eight years or the lease period, whichever is shorter.  Mineral properties with proven and probable reserves and the plant are depreciated using units of production based on estimated mine reserves.mineralized material.  Other furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three to five years. Depreciation on plant and equipment used in the construction of an asset is capitalized to the constructed asset.

 

As discussed above, the Company does not have any properties with proven or probable reserves including the the Velardeña Properties.

 

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost and per the guidance of ASC 360 the Company assesses the recoverability of its property, plant and equipment, including goodwill, at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  If the sum of estimated future net cash flows on an undiscounted basis is less than the carrying amount of the related asset, impairment is considered to exist. The related impairment loss is measured by comparing estimated future net cash flows on a discounted basis or by comparing other market indicators to the carrying amount of the asset (see Notes 8 and 9).asset.

 

F-9The Company evaluated its remaining long lived assets at December 31, 2016 and 2017, and determined that no impairment was required.



 

F-9


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

ASC 350 requires that an entity assign its goodwill to reporting units and test each reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the goodwill may be impaired.  The Company wrote off the remaining balance of its goodwill related to the Velardeña Properties as of December 31, 2013 (see Note 9).

g.Assetg.Asset Retirement Obligations

 

The Company records asset retirement obligations (“ARO”) in accordance with ASC 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations” (“ASC 410”), which establishes a uniform methodology for accounting for estimated reclamation and abandonment costs. According to ASC 410, the fair value of an ARO is recognized in the period in which it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. An offsetting asset retirement cost (“ARC”) is capitalized as part of the carrying value of the assets with which it is associated, and depreciated over the useful life of the asset (see Note 11).

 

The Company prepares estimates of the timing and amount of expected cash flows when an ARO is incurred. The fair value of the ARO is measured by discounting the expected cash flows using a discount rate that reflects the credit adjusted risk-free rate of interest. The Company records the fair value of an ARO when it is incurred and changes in the fair valuelayer adjustments of the ARO are recorded as an adjustment to the corresponding ARC. The ARO is adjusted to reflect the passage of time (accretion cost) calculated by applying the discount rate implicit in the initial fair value measurement to the beginning-of-period carrying amount of the ARO. The Company records accretion costs to expense as incurred.

 

h.Revenueh.Revenue Recognition

 

FollowingThe Company recognizes oxide plant lease fees and reimbursements for labor, utility and other costs as "Revenue from Oxide plant lease" in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss following the guidance of ASC 605 “Revenue Recognition” (“regarding "income statement characterization of reimbursements received for "out-of-pocket" expenses incurred" and "reporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent". ASC 605”),605 supports recording as gross revenue fees received for the reimbursement of expenses in situations where the recipient is the primary obligor and has certain discretion in the incurrence of the reimbursable expense. The actual costs incurred for the reimbursed labor, utility and other costs are reported as "Oxide plant lease costs" in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company recognizes “Revenue fromlease fees during the sale of metals” at the earliest point that both risk of loss and title transfer to the purchaser pursuant toperiod as fees are earned per the terms of the Company’s sales agreements. Prices for concentrate and precipitate sales are fixed according to terms included in the sales agreements, which generally call for final pricing based on average metals prices observed over specific periods that range from 10 days prior to the transfer of title to the month following the month the product is received by the purchaser.  Revenue is recorded based on estimated metals contained in the product from assay data and using either actual or projected prices for the pricing period specified in the sales agreement.  Upon final settlement revenue may be adjusted for changes in actual contained metals and final metals prices.lease (see Note 16).

 

i.StockiStock compensation

 

Stock based compensation costs are recognized per the guidance of ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation” (“ASC 718”), using a graded vesting attribution method whereby costs are recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award (see Note 15).  Stock grants are valued at their grant date at fair value which in the case of options requires the use of the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Per ASC 718 the grants may be classified as equity grants or liability grants depending on the terms of the grant.

 

j.Netj.Net income (loss) per Share of Common Stock/Ordinary ShareStock

 

Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to holders of the Company’s Common Stock by the weighted average number of shares of Common Stock/Ordinary SharesStock outstanding for the period.  Diluted income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue Common Stock or Ordinary Shares were exercised or converted into Common Stock or Ordinary Shares.Stock.

 

At December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, all potentially dilutive shares were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because to include them would have been anti-dilutive.

 

F-10


F-10



 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

k.Comprehensivek.Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as all changes in equity (deficit), exclusive of transactions with stockholders, such as capital investments.  Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and changes in certain assets and liabilities that are reported directly in equity.  For the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 Comprehensive Lossloss included the change in the market value of available for sale securities and is reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.Income (Loss).

 

l.        ��                                Incomel.Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”), on a tax jurisdictional basis.  The Company files United States and certain other foreign country income tax returns, and pays taxes reasonably determined to be due.  The tax rules and regulations in these countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation.  The Company’s income tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities and in connection with such examinations, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain tax rules within the country involved.  In accordance with ASC 740, the Company identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions, and recognizes the impact of uncertain tax positions for which there is a less than more-likely-than-not probability of the position being upheld when reviewed by the relevant taxing authority.  Such positions are deemed to be unrecognized tax benefits and a corresponding liability is established on the balance sheet.

 

The Company classifies income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense.

 

m.Recentlym.Recently Adopted Standards

 

In February 2013,July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)  issued ASU 2017-11,  “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part 1) Accounting Standards Updatefor Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Non public Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU”ASU 2017-11”) 2013-02, “Reporting.  Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting.  Down round features are features of Amounts Reclassified outcertain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”. The purpose of this accounting standard updatefuture equity offerings. An entity still is required to improvedetermine whether instruments would be classified as equity under the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income andguidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities. ASU 2017-11 is effective for public entities prospectively forannual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012.  Substantially all of the information2018, including interim periods within that this update requires alreadyreporting period. Early adoption is required to be disclosed elsewherepermitted, including in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. However, the new requirement regarding presenting information about amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and their corresponding effect on net income will present, in one place, information about significant amounts reclassified and, in some cases, cross-references to related footnote disclosures.an interim period. The Company had only immaterial amounts classified out of accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.  The adoption of this standard did not have an impact onearly adopted ASU 2017-11 during the Company’s financial position or results of operations and is not expected to have an impact in the future.interim period ended September 30, 2017 (see Note 3).

 

In July 2013March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-11 “Income Taxes(“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 740)718): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists”Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2013-11”2016-09”), which requires an unrecognizedsimplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions including accounting for income taxes and classification of excess tax benefit to be presented as a reduction to a deferredbenefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures and minimum statutory tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward thatwithholding requirements.  For the entity intends to use andCompany, ASU 2016-09 is available for settlement at the reporting date. ASU 2013-11 became effective for the Company January 1, 2014.annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. The adoption of ASU 2013-11 has2016-09 in 2017 did not hadmaterially change the Company’s previous accounting methods and therefore did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.operation.

F-11


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

n.Recently Issued PronouncementsIn November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, “Income Taxes: Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes” (“ASU 2015-17”). ASU 2015-17 requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. This update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-17 in 2017 did not materially change the Company’s previous accounting methods and therefore did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operation.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “Inventory, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory” (“ASU 2015‑11”). ASU 2015-11 affects reporting entities that measure inventory using first-in, first-out or average cost. ASU 2015‑11 requires that inventory be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. ASU 2015-11 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016.  The adoption of ASU 2015-11 in 2017 did not materially change the Company’s previous accounting methods and therefore did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operation.

 

On August 27, 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern” (“ASU No. 2014-15”2014‑15”).  ASU No. 2014-15 will require management to evaluate whether there are conditions and events that raise substantial doubt about the

F-11



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Company’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the financial statements are issued on both an interim and annual basis. Management will beis required to provide certain footnote disclosures if it concludes that substantial doubt exists or when its plans alleviate substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company adopted ASU 2014-15 in 2016 and has since included disclosures in its financial statements consistent with the pronouncement.

n.Recently Issued Pronouncements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15 becomes2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments” (“ASU 2016-13”).  ASU 2016-13 modifies the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the currently used incurred loss methodology, which will result in the more timely recognition of losses. ASU 2016-13 will be effective for the Company as of January 1, 2020. As the Company’s principle credit risk is related to its Lease Receivables the Company does not expect the adoption of this update to result in a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08,  “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)” (“ASU 2016-08”), which clarifies principal versus agent when another party, along with the entity, is involved in providing a good or service to a customer. Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, requires an entity to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide that good or service to the customer (i.e., the entity is a principal) or to arrange for the good or service to be provided to the customer by the other party (i.e., the entity is an agent). For the Company, ASU 2016-08 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. As the Company’s current accounting practices per the guidance of ASC 605 are comparable to the requirements of ASU 2016-08, the Company does not expect the adoption of this update to result in a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations or the requirement for retrospective reporting.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases” (“ASU 2016-02”), which will require lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for interim reporting periods startingall leases with terms greater than twelve months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income

F-12


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

statement. For a lessor, the accounting applied is largely unchanged from previous guidance. The new rules will be effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2019. The Company does not anticipate early adoption. The Company currently leases administrative offices in the U.S. and in several foreign locations under lease agreements that typically exceed one year.  Depending on the number of years remaining under such lease agreements the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that the Company would record under ASU 2016-2 could be material.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“ASU 2016-01”) which amended its standards related to the accounting of certain financial instruments. This amendment addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. The new rules will become effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this amendmentASU 2016-01 to materially change its current accounting methods and therefore the Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

OnIn May 28, 2014, FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards UpdateASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. In addition, the guidance requires improved disclosures to help users of financial statements better understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue that is recognized and the related cash flows. ASU 2014-09 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016;2017; early applicationadoption is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the financial statement implications of adopting ASU 2014-09 was originally effective December 15, 2016 but does not believe adoptionASU 2015-14 deferred the effective date by one year.  As the Company’s current accounting practices per the guidance of ASU 2014-09 will haveare comparable to the requirements of ASU 2014-09, the Company does not expect the adoption of this update to result in a material impact on its consolidated financial position or results of operations.

 

On April 10, 20143. Change in Accounting Principle

In July 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 “PresentationASU 2017-11.  Part I relates to the accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features in Subtopic 815-40, which is considered in determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument qualifies for a scope exception from derivative accounting.  Down round features are features of Financial Statements (Topic 205)certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced based on the pricing of future equity offerings.  An entity still is required to determine whether instruments would be classified in equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 in determining whether they qualify for that scope exception. If they do qualify, freestanding instruments with down round features are no longer classified as liabilities.  In the case where the exception from derivative accounting does not apply, warrants must be accounted for as a liability and Property, Plant,recorded at fair value at the date of grant and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operationsre-valued at the end of each reporting period.

The Company’s September 2012 and Disclosures2014 warrants (see Note 15) include anti-dilution provisions characterized as down round features and have previously been accounted for as liabilities, with the fair value of Disposalsthe warrant liabilities remeasured at each reporting date and the change in liabilities recorded as other non-operating income or loss.  The Company had recorded a “Warrant liability of Components$1.9 million and a warrant derivative gain of an Entity” (“$17.1 million in its “Accumulated deficit” as reported in its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for the year ended December 31, 2016 relating to the September 2012 and 2014 warrants.The Company had recorded a warrant liability of $1.5 million as of June 30, 2017 and reported a warrant derivative gain of $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 relating to the September 2012 and 2014 warrants.

F-13


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

In addition, for freestanding equity-classified financial instruments, ASU 2014-08)2017-11 also requires entities that present earnings per share (EPS) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down round feature when it is triggered.  That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS.  Certain equity transactions following the issuance of the September 2012 and 2014 warrants have triggered anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements resulting in additional warrant shares and a reduction to the original strike price of the warrants.  ASU 2017-11 prescribes a method to measure the value of a deemed dividend related to a triggering event by computing the difference in fair value between two instruments that have terms consistent with the actual instrument but that do not have a down round feature, where the number of warrant shares and strike price of one instrument corresponds to the actual instrument before the triggering event and the number of warrant shares and strike price of the other instrument corresponds to the actual instrument immediately after the triggering event.  Following ASU 2017-11, for periods ending on or prior to December 31, 2016 the Company would have reduced its “Accumulated deficit as reported on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets by approximately $0.3 million related to prior triggering events.  During the nine month period ending September 30, 2017 the Company would have reduced its accumulated deficit by approximately $5,000 related to triggering events.

Except for the down round features in the September 2012 and 2014 warrants, the warrants would have been classified in equity under the guidance in Subtopic 815-40 and therefore qualify for the scope exception in ASU 2017-11As permitted, the Company elected to adopt the accounting principles prescribed by ASU 2014-08 changes2017-11 for the criteriainterim period ended September 30, 2017 and has recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment stemming from a change in accounting principle in its financial statements for reporting discontinuedthe year ended December  31, 2017 measured retrospectively to the beginning of 2017.  The cumulative effect adjustment appears at the beginning of 2017 in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity.  The results of operations while enhancing disclosures in this area. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals representing a strategic shift in operations will be presented as discontinued operations. Additionally, ASU 2014-08 requires expanded disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide financial statement users with more information about the assets, liabilities, income, and expenses of discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 will become effective for the Company January 1, 2015. for year ended December 31, 2017 reflects application of the change in accounting principle from the beginning of 2017.

The Company does not believefollowing table details the adoptionimpact stemming from the cumulative effect of ASU 2014-08 will have a material impactthe change in accounting principle on the Company’s consolidated financial position or resultsConsolidated Balance Sheets as of operations.the beginning of 2017.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported after

 

    

As Previously

    

 

Cumulative

    

the Effect of a Change in

 

 

Reported

 

Effect Adjustment

 

Accounting Principle

Balance Sheet Accounts Impacted by

 

December 31,

 

at the Beginning

 

at the Beginning

September 2012 and 2014 Warrants

 

2016

 

of 2017

 

of 2017

 

 

(in thousands)

Warrant Liability - Related Party

 

$

976

 

$

(976)

 

$

 —

Warrant Liability

 

 

922

 

 

(922)

 

 

 —

Additional Paid-in Capital

 

 

495,455

 

 

19,046

 

 

514,501

Accumulated Deficit

 

 

(488,037)

 

 

(17,148)

 

 

(505,185)

 

As noted above, the Company had previously reported a warrant derivative gain of $0.4 million during the six month period ending June 30, 2017.  Because the Company has retroactively applied the change in accounting principle discussed above to the beginning of 2017, the Company is no longer reporting warrant derivative gains or losses for the September 2012 and 2014 warrants beginning in 2017.  Amounts reported for periods ending on or prior to December 31, 2016 have not been adjusted.

F-14


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

3.Cash4.Cash and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents. Short-term investments include investments with maturities greater than three months, but not exceeding 12 months, or highly liquid investments with maturities greater than 12 months that the Company intends to liquidate during the next 12 months for working capital needs.

 

4.The following tables summarize the Company's short-term investments at December 31, 2017 and 2016:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

 

 

    

Estimated

    

Carrying

 

December 31, 2017

 

Cost

 

Fair Value

 

Value

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale common stock

 

$

275

 

$

238

 

$

238

 

Total available for sale

 

 

275

 

 

238

 

 

238

 

Total short term

 

$

275

 

$

238

 

$

238

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Short-term:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Available for sale common stock

 

$

275

 

$

334

 

$

334

 

Total available for sale

 

 

275

 

 

334

 

 

334

 

Total short term

 

$

275

 

$

334

 

$

334

 

Credit Risk

The Company invests substantially all of its excess cash with high credit-quality financial institutions or in U.S. government or debt securities.  Credit risk is the risk that a third party might fail to fulfill its performance obligations under the terms of a financial instrument. For cash and equivalents and investments, credit risk represents the carrying amount on the balance sheet. The Company mitigates credit risk for cash and equivalents and investments by placing its funds and investments with high credit-quality financial institutions, limiting the amount of exposure to each of the financial institutions, monitoring the financial condition of the financial institutions and investing only in government and corporate securities rated “investment grade” or better.  The Company invests with financial institutions that maintain a net worth of not less than $1 billion and are members in good standing of the Securities Investor Protection Corporation.

F-15


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Prepaid5.Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

 

Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of the following:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Prepaid insurance

 

$

542

 

$

687

 

Prepaid contractor fees and vendor advances

 

100

 

193

 

Taxes receivable

 

90

 

96

 

Recoupable deposits and other

 

103

 

115

 

 

 

$

835

 

$

1,091

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31,

    

December 31,

 

 

2017

 

 

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Prepaid insurance

 

$

362

 

$

296

 

Deferred offering costs

 

 

137

 

 

153

 

Recoupable deposits and other

 

 

246

 

 

129

 

 

 

$

745

 

$

578

 

 

The prepaid contractor fees and vendor advances consist of advance payments madedeferred offering costs are related to contractors and suppliers primarily at the Company’s Velardeña PropertiesATM Program discussed in Mexico.detail in Note 15.

 

F-126.Inventories



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

December 31, 2013

The prepaid contractor fees and vendor advances consist of advance payments made to contractors and suppliers primarily at the Company’s Velardeña Properties in Mexico.

In addition, included in non-current assets at December 31, 2013 is approximately $30,000 of prepaid insurance on which amortization will be recognized through 2015.

5.Inventories

 

Inventories at the Velardeña Properties were as follows:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Metals inventory

 

$

477

 

$

 

In-process inventory

 

307

 

 

Material and supplies

 

713

 

449

 

 

 

$

1,497

 

$

449

 

At December 31, 2014 the Company had written down its metals and in-process inventories to net realizable value including a charge to cost of metals sold of $1.2 million and a charge to depreciation expense of approximately $0.7 million.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Material and supplies

 

$

242

 

$

245

 

 

 

$

242

 

$

245

 

 

The Company had no metals or in process inventoriesmaterial and supplies inventory at December 31, 2013 as the result of the suspension of mining2017 and processing at2016 are related to the Velardeña Properties (see Note 1).and are reduced by a $0.2 million obsolescence reserve.

 

6.Value7.Value added tax receivable

 

The Company has recorded value added tax (“VAT”) paid in Mexico and related to the Velardeña Properties as a recoverable asset. Mexico law allows for certain VAT payments to be recovered through ongoing applicationsfrom VAT collected from the sale of products or rendering of services. At December 31, 2017, the Company has also recorded approximately $19,000 of VAT receivable as a reduction to VAT payable in Mexico, which appears in “Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

During 2017 the Company received refunds of approximately $1.1 million from the government of Argentina for refunds.VAT payments made in that country during 2012 and 2013. Because of uncertainties relating to collectability of the taxes the Company had recorded a full valuation allowance against the VAT receivable at the time the taxes were paid. The Company expects thatreported the current amounts$1.1 million of VAT refunds received during the year ended December 31, 2017 in “Other operating income” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. In February 2018, we received an additional approximately $138,000 of VAT refunds. At December 31, 2017, the Company reversed $138,000 of the valuation allowance and recorded a VAT receivable of $138,000 with a corresponding gain in “Other operating income” on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company has remaining Argentina VAT refund claims totaling approximately $0.1 million.  The Company cannot predict if or when it will be recovered withinreceive these additional VAT refunds and accordingly has recorded a one year period.full valuation allowance against the remaining VAT refund claims.  

F-16


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

The Company has also paid VAT in Mexico as well as other countries, primarily related to exploration projects, which has been charged to expense as incurred because of the uncertainty of recoverability.

 

7.Property,8.Property, Plant and Equipment

 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 

The components of property, plant, and equipment, net were as follows:

 

F-13


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineral properties

 

$

9,352

 

$

9,352

 

Exploration properties

 

 

2,518

 

 

2,518

 

Royalty properties

 

 

200

 

 

200

 

Buildings

 

 

4,246

 

 

4,386

 

Mining equipment and machinery

 

 

15,989

 

 

16,351

 

Other furniture and equipment

 

 

958

 

 

952

 

Asset retirement cost

 

 

865

 

 

992

 

 

 

 

34,128

 

 

34,751

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization

 

 

(25,988)

 

 

(25,516)

 

 

 

$

8,140

 

$

9,235

 


 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineral properties

 

$

22,397

 

$

22,397

 

Exploration properties

 

2,743

 

2,993

 

Royalty properties

 

200

 

200

 

Buildings

 

2,848

 

2,349

 

Mining equipment and machinery

 

19,224

 

19,441

 

Other furniture and equipment

 

841

 

1,054

 

Asset retirement cost

 

2,002

 

2,087

 

 

 

50,255

 

50,521

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation & amortization

 

(21,224

)

(18,146

)

 

 

29,031

 

32,375

 

During the year ended December 31, 2014In August 2016, the Company sold 45certain mining concessions totaling 770 hectares located in the Zacatecas District, Zacatecas State, Mexico,equipment consisting of two haul trucks, two scoop trams and a compressor to Capstone MiningMinera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of The Sentient Group, for $700,000 and recorded $687,000 (see Note 23). The equipment sold was excess equipment held at the Company’s Velardeña $0.5 million gain on the sale.  Also in the third quarter 2014,Properties that the Company entered into an option agreement withdid not expect to use.  The equipment had a private party to sell its 1,100 hectare Otuzco propertynet book value of $27,000 resulting in Peru for $450,000.  At December 31, 2014 the Company had received $150,000 under the option agreement, with the remainder payablea gain of $660,000 in 2015 if the option2016. The gain is maintained and exercised.  In addition, the Company sold miscellaneous surplus equipment locatedincluded in Argentina for $130,000 and recorded a nominal gain. The net gains for the above sales are reflected in otherOther operating income, net onnet” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company received $69,000 or 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale, with the remaining $618,000 plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10% due in February 2017.

 

DuringWith the year ended December 31, 2013approval of a Special Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company relinquishedand Minera Indé amended the rightsoriginal equipment sale on March 31, 2017 to two exploration propertiesinclude the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000 and extend the time for payment relating to the original equipment sale.  Upon execution of the amendment the Company received an additional payment of $100,000. The remaining principal and interest balance, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, was amended to be due in Mexico that did not meetAugust 2017.  The Company recorded a gain of $105,000 in 2017 on the Company’s minimum requirements for continued evaluation. The properties had a carrying valuesale of approximately $0.2 million which isthe additional equipment, included in Loss from operations.

Also during 2013 the Company reduced the carrying value of the Velardeña Properties property, plant and equipment by $235.3 million and the carrying value of the San Diego mineral property by $8.7 million and recorded $244.0 million of impairment charges onOther operating income, net” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated StatementStatements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, (see Note 8).  The table below sets forth the detail of the impairment charges recordedequal to the Velardeñgross proceeds less the remaining basis in the equipment.  On May 2, 2017, the Company received approximately $750,000 from Minera Indé as payment in full for the remaining balance due related to the equipment sale, including interest through that date.

On August 2, 2016, the Company entered into a Properties property, plant and equipment anddefinitive agreement to sell its remaining 50% interest in the San Diego mineralexploration property at December 31, 2013:

 

 

Impairment Charges

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Properties

 

San Diego

 

Total

 

 

 

Asset Group

 

Asset Group

 

Impairment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineral properties

 

$

217,524

 

$

 

$

217,524

 

Exploration properties

 

3,472

 

8,659

 

12,131

 

Buildings

 

3,036

 

 

3,036

 

Mining equipment and machinery

 

10,394

 

 

10,394

 

Other furniture and equipment

 

900

 

 

900

 

 

 

235,326

 

8,659

 

243,985

 

in Mexico to Golden Tag Resources ltd (“Golden Tag”), the company that held the other 50% interest in the property. As a result of the sale, the Company received approximately $379,000 in cash and 2,500,000 common shares of Golden Tag.  Pursuant to the agreement, Golden Tag will be required to pay the Company a 2.0% net smelter return royalty in respect to the San Diego property. The carrying value afterCompany had previously written down the impairment represents the fair value of the assets

F-17


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

San Diego property to approximately zero and accordingly recognized a gain of approximately $0.5 million in 2016 on the sale. The gain is included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. Following this transaction, the Company now holds 7,500,000 common shares representing approximately 10% of the outstanding common shares of Golden Tag (see Note 4).

In August 2016, the Company, through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, entered into an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum Global Holdings, L.P., a privately owned company (together “Electrum”), related to the Company’s Celaya exploration property in Mexico. The Company received an upfront payment of $0.2 million and Electrum agreed to incur exploration expenditures totaling at least $0.5 million in the first year of the agreement, reduced by certain costs Electrum previously incurred on the property since December 2015 in its ongoing surface exploration program. Electrum, at its option, can elect to acquire an undivided 60% interest in a joint venture company to be formed to hold the Celaya project after incurring exploration expenditures totaling $2.5 million during the initial first three years of the agreement. Electrum would serve as discussedmanager of the joint venture. Prior to an amendment to the agreement, the Company would have been allowed to maintain a 40% interest in Note 8.the Celaya project, following the initial three-year earn-in period, by contributing its pro-rata share of an additional $2.5 million in exploration or development expenditures incurred over a second three-year period.  In February 2018, the Company and Electrum amended the Celaya earn-in agreement to permit Electrum to earn, at its option, an additional 20% interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a payment of $1.0 million.  Electrum can now increase its total interest in the project to 80% by contributing 100% of the $2.5 million of additional expenditures required in the second three-year earn-in period.  Following the second earn-in period the Company will have the right to maintain its 20% participating interest or its interest could ultimately be converted into a carried 10% net profits interest if the Company elects not to participate as a joint venture owner.  The Company has previously expensed all of its costs associated with the Celaya property and accordingly recognized a gain of $0.2 million from the farm-out of the property in 2016 and will recognize an additional gain of $1.0 million from the execution of the amendment to the agreement in the first quarter 2018. The $0.2 million gain recognized in 2016 is included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

In April 2016, the Company entered into an option agreement under which Santacruz Silver Mining Ltd. (“Santacruz”) may acquire the Company’s interest in certain nonstrategic mineral claims located in the Zacatecas Mining District, Zacatecas, Mexico (the “Zacatecas Properties”) for a series of payments totaling $1.5 million, including a final payment of $0.5 million due in April 2018. To date, Santacruz has paid the Company approximately $0.9 million.  The Company and Santacruz amended the option agreement in February 2018 to extend the due dates for the remaining series of payments through September 2018.  To complete the acquisition of the Zacatecas Properties Santacruz must now make three additional payments of $225,000 each in March, June and September 2018.  Santacruz has the right to terminate the option agreement at any time, and the agreement could be terminated, at the Company’s option, if Santacruz fails to make subsequent payments when due.  The Company has previously expensed all of its costs associated with the Zacatecas Properties and accordingly recognized a gain of $0.5 million and $0.4 million in 2017 and 2016 respectively, included in “Other operating income, net” in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

 

The assetAsset retirement cost (“ARC”) is all related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties.  The amounts for ARC have been fully depreciated at December 31, 2017.  The decrease in the ARC during the period is related to an adjustment to the asset retirement obligation (“ARO”) (seeARO, as discussed below in Note 11).11.

 

F-14


F-18



 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

8.Impairment of Long Lived Assets

Velardeña Properties Asset Group

The Velardeña Properties asset group consists of the property, plant, and equipment and working capital related to the Velardeña Properties. Per the guidance of ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”), the Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment, at least annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  Based on the Company’s assessment of the recoverability of the Velardeña Properties at December 31, 2014 no impairment was deemed to have occurred during 2014.

Prices for silver and gold decreased approximately 34% and 26% respectively from March 31, 2013 to June 30, 2013.  The significant decrease in metals prices and the shutdown of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties at the end of the second quarter 2013 were events that required an assessment of the recoverability of the Velardeña Properties asset group at June 30, 2013. Per the guidance of ASC 360, recoverability of an asset group is not achieved if the projected undiscounted, pre-tax cash flows related to the asset group are less than its carrying amount. In its analysis of projected cash flows from the Velardeña Properties, the Company determined that the Velardeña Properties asset group was impaired. As a result, at June 30, 2013 and later at December 31, 2013 the Company recorded impairment charges totaling $235.3 million to arrive at a fair value for the Velardeña Properties of $23.9 million at December 31, 2013, as shown in the table below.

The Company also recomputed deferred tax assets and liabilities associated with the Velardeña Properties asset group and determined, based on the new carrying value of the Velardeña Properties asset group, that no net deferred tax liabilities exist. Therefore, the net deferred tax liabilities calculated prior to the impairment of approximately $45.0 million were written off and the Company recorded an income tax benefit equal to that amount for the year ended December 31, 2013 (see Note 14).

In arriving at a fair value for the Velardeña mineral deposit and exploration properties at June 30, 2013 the Company used a market valuation approach, which the Company deemed reasonable under the circumstances, that considered a combination of: (1) recently published market data reflecting an average in the ground mineral resource value for a representative group of junior silver mining companies primarily located in Mexico and South America, and (2) recent mineral resource acquisition and development cost data provided by a third party mining engineering consultant. From this data the Company inferred an enterprise value for the Velardeña Properties of approximately $0.29 per ounce of estimated equivalent silver ounces contained in the Velardeña Properties deposit.  From the derived enterprise value the Company subtracted the fair value assigned to tangible assets and working capital to arrive at a residual value for the mineral and exploration properties.  Using this approach, the Company determined that the Velardeña Properties asset group, including tangible assets, had a fair value of approximately $23.9 million at December 31, 2013, resulting in total impairment charges of $235.3 million for 2013.

The tangible assets at the Velardeña Properties were separately analyzed by a third party valuation firm using available market data to determine a fair value based on the net realizable value that could be received in a sale to a third party. The market data was derived by researching the secondary equipment market on sales and/or offers for sale of similar assets. The tangible assets were determined to have a fair value of approximately $9.6 million, resulting in an impairment charge of approximately $14.3 million at June 30, 2013.

The market valuation approach used in the determination of fair value falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy per ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”) (see Note 13) and relies upon assumptions related to the condition and location of the Velardeña Properties asset group in comparison to other corroborated observable market data.

The following table details the components of the impairment of the Velardeña Properties Asset Group:

F-15



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

Net Book Value

 

 

 

Net Book Value

 

 

 

Net Book Value

 

 

 

Prior to

 

Jun. 30, 2013

 

After

 

Dec. 31, 2013

 

After

 

 

 

Impairment at

 

Impairment

 

Impairment at

 

Impairment

 

Impairment at

 

 

 

Jun. 30, 2013

 

Charges

 

Jun. 30, 2013

 

Charges

 

Dec. 31, 2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Mineral properties (1)

 

$

232,805

 

$

211,608

 

$

21,197

 

$

5,916

 

$

15,384

 

Exploration properties

 

3,472

 

3,472

 

 

 

 

Tangible assets (2)

 

23,928

 

14,330

 

9,598

 

 

8,485

 

 

 

$

260,205

 

$

229,410

 

$

30,795

 

$

5,916

 

$

23,869

 


(1)The December 31, 2013 mineral properties net book value reflects a $0.1 million adjustment recorded during the fourth quarter of 2013 in addition to the impairment charge.

(2)The December 31, 2013 tangible assets net book value reflects depreciation and asset disposals recorded during the third and fourth quarters of 2013.

San Diego Property Asset Group

At December 31, 2014 the Company had a 50% ownership interest in the San Diego exploration property, which is located approximately 10 kilometers from the Velardeña Properties.   Because of its close proximity to the Velardeña Properties, the San Diego property could become a source of additional ore for the Velardeña Properties if developed in the future. The San Diego property is included in the Velardeña Properties reporting segment but is separate from the Velardeña Properties asset group.

Per the guidance of ASC 360, the Company assesses the recoverability of its property, plant and equipment at least annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable.  Based on the Company’s assessment of the recoverability of the San Diego property at December 31, 2014 no impairment of the San Diego properties was deemed to have occurred during 2014.

As discussed above relating to the impairment of long lived assets associated with the Velardeña Properties asset group, the significant decrease in metals prices in the early part of 2013 and the shutdown of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties at the end of the second quarter 2013 were events that required the assessment of the recoverability of the carrying amounts of the San Diego property.  Because the San Diego property is in the exploration stage a market valuation approach was used to determine the fair value for the property. Because of the close proximity and geological similarities of the San Diego property to the Velardeña Properties mineral deposit and exploration properties, and given that both the San Diego property and the Velardeña Properties mineral deposit and exploration properties were originally recorded at fair value at the same time as part of the ECU merger transaction,  the Company determined that the impairment of the Velardeña mineral deposit and exploration properties provided a reasonable estimate for the decline in fair value of the San Diego property.  As such, at June 30, 2013 and later at December 31, 2013 the Company recorded impairment charges totaling $8.7 million to arrive at a fair value for the San Diego property of $0.6 million at December 31, 2013, as shown in the table below.

The market valuation approach used in the determination of fair value falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy per ASC 820 (see Note 13) and relies upon assumptions related to the condition and location of the San Diego property in comparison to other corroborated observable market data.

The following table details the components of the impairment of the San Diego Property Asset Group:

F-16



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

Net Book Value

 

 

 

Net Book Value

 

 

 

Net Book Value

 

 

 

Prior to

 

Jun. 30, 2013

 

After

 

Dec. 31, 2013

 

After

 

 

 

Impairment at

 

Impairment

 

Impairment at

 

Impairment

 

Impairment at

 

 

 

Jun. 30, 2013

 

Charges

 

Jun. 30, 2013

 

Charges

 

Dec. 31, 2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Exploration properties

 

$

9,260

 

$

8,428

 

$

832

 

$

231

 

$

601

 

 

 

$

9,260

 

$

8,428

 

$

832

 

$

231

 

$

601

 

9.Impairment of Goodwill

Prior to December 31, 2013 the Company reflected goodwill on its balance sheet related to the acquisition of the Velardeña Properties as part of the ECU merger transaction primarily as a result of the requirement to record a deferred tax liability for the difference between the fair value and the tax basis of both the assets acquired and liabilities assumed.  Per the guidance of ASC 350, “Intangible — Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”), the Company assesses the recoverability of its goodwill at least annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the goodwill may be impaired.  The carrying value of goodwill, related to the Mexico ECU reporting unit, was fully written off at December 31, 2013.  The Company recorded impairment charges related to goodwill of $11.7 million during 2013.

As discussed in Note 8, regarding the impairment of long lived assets related to the Velardeña Properties asset group, the significant decrease in metals prices and shutdown of mining and processing at the Velardeña Properties during 2013 were events that also required an assessment of whether goodwill had been impaired.  In determining the impairment of goodwill, the Company used an analysis of discounted after-tax cash flows to calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill related to the Velardeña Properties asset group following the guidance of ASC 805. Several mining, processing and shutdown scenarios were combined to arrive at a single projection of cash flows using a weighted average approach, which assigned probabilities to the occurrence of each individual scenario.  The cash flow analysis used in the impairment assessment for goodwill related to the Velardeña Properties falls within level 3 of the fair value hierarchy per ASC 820 (see Note 13) and includes various inputs including the weighted average cost of capital of 21%, projected future metals prices, and assumptions from the Company’s Velardeña Properties mining and processing plans. The most significant unobservable factors are certain assumptions used in the Velardeña Properties mining and processing plans and include: 1) ore grades consistent with the Company’s current and previously reported estimates of mineralized material, 2) plant throughput consistent with projected mining and processing plans under the various mining and processing scenarios, 3) the Company’s projections of operating costs, and 4) the weighting of mining and processing scenarios.  The weighted average cost of capital and forecast of future metals prices were obtained from a third party valuation consultant that derived the data from corroborated observable market data. Metals prices used in the cash flow analysis for silver ranged from $23.80 to $18.06 per ounce and for gold ranged from $1,440 to $1,198 per ounce.

10.Accounts9.Accounts Payable and Other Accrued Liabilities

 

The Company’s accounts payable and other accrued liabilities consist of the following:

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable and accruals

 

$

893

 

$

717

 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

 

746

 

648

 

 

 

$

1,639

 

$

1,365

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Accounts payable and accruals

 

$

310

 

$

344

 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits

 

 

1,246

 

 

880

 

 

 

$

1,556

 

$

1,224

 

 

F-17



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

December 31, 20142017

 

Accounts payable and accruals at December 31, 2014 are2017 consist primarily related to amountsof $0.1 million and $0.2 million due to contractors and suppliers in the amounts of $0.7 million and $0.2 million related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties and corporate administrative activities, respectively.  In the case of the Velardeña Properties, amounts due also include VAT payable that is not anpartially offset to theby a small VAT receivable.

 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits at December 31, 20142017 consist of $0.1$0.2 million of accrued vacation payable, and $0.6 million related toof withholding taxes and benefits payable of(of which $0.3 million is related to activities at the Velardeña Properties.Properties) and $0.4 million related to the Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan ("KELTIP") (see Note 15).

 

December 31, 20132016

 

Accounts payable and accruals at December 31, 2013 are2016 consist primarily related to amountsof $0.1 million and $0.2 million due to contractors and suppliers in the amounts of $0.4 million, $0.2 million and $0.1 million related to the Company’s Velardeña Properties and corporate administrative activities, and exploration, respectively.  In the case of the Velardeña Properties, amounts due also include VAT payable that is not ana partial offset to the small VAT receivable.

 

Accrued employee compensation and benefits at December 31, 20132016 consist of $0.1$0.2 million of accrued vacation payable, and $0.5$0.4 million related toof withholding taxes and benefits payable of(of which $0.3$0.2 million is related to activities at the Velardeña Properties.Properties) and $0.3 million related to the KELTIP (see Note 15).

 

Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan10.Convertible Note Payable – Related Party, Net

 

In December  2013,October 2015, the BoardCompany borrowed $5.0 million from Sentient, the Company’s largest stockholder, pursuant to the terms of Directorsa Senior Secured Convertible Note the (“Sentient Note”) and a related loan agreement (the “Sentient Loan”), with principal and accrued interest due on October 27, 2016. In January 2016, upon approval by the Company’s stockholders, the Sentient Note became convertible, solely at Sentient's option, into shares of the Company's common stock at a price equal to the lowest of: 1) $0.289, 90 percent of the 15-day volume weighted average price ("VWAP") for the period immediately preceding the loan closing date, 2) 90 percent of the 15-day VWAP for the period immediately preceding the loan conversion date, or 3) an anti-dilution adjusted price based on the lowest price for which the Company approvedhas sold its stock following the loan closing date. The loan provided for interest at a rate of 9% per annum, compounded monthly.

On February 11, 2016, Sentient converted approximately $3.9 million of principal and $0.1 million of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the conversion date) on the Sentient Note into 23,355,000 shares of

F-19


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

the Company's common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.172 per share, equal to 90% of the 15-day VWAP immediately preceding the conversion date. On June 10, 2016, Sentient converted the remaining approximately $1.1 million of principal and approximately $34,000 of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at the conversion date) into 4,011,740 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price of approximately $0.289 per share, equal to 90% of the 15day VWAP immediately preceding the loan’s original issue date.

The beneficial conversion feature of the Sentient Note represented an embedded derivative as defined by ASC 815 "Derivatives and Hedging" ("ASC 815"). ASC 815 provides that a derivative instrument's fair value must be bifurcated from the note and separately recorded on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company used a third party consultant to value the embedded derivative in the Sentient Note employing a Monte Carlo type probability analysis, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 13). For purposes of valuing the embedded derivative as of the Sentient Loan closing date, at December 31, 2015, at February 11, 2016 (first partial conversion date), and at March 31, 2016, the valuation model took into account, among other items: 1) the probability of successfully achieving stockholder approval of the Sentient Note’s conversion feature, 2) future variations in the Company’s stock price, and 3) the probability of entering into an equity transaction prior to the Sentient Loan maturity date that would lower the conversion price. It was determined that the embedded derivative had a fair value of approximately $1.1 million at October 27, 2015, the date the Company entered into the Sentient Loan.  Subsequent mark-to-market changes in the value of the derivative were recorded as income or loss in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  The Sentient Note was recorded net of the bifurcated embedded derivative at October 27, 2015 with the $1.1 million difference between the face value and the recorded value of the Note representing a loan discount that was amortized to interest expense over the life of the loan using the interest rate method. 

The Company incurred approximately $0.3 million in legal and other costs associated with the Sentient Loan. Per the guidance of ASU 2015-03 the loan costs were presented as a reduction to the note payable on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and were amortized to interest expense over the life of the Sentient note using the interest rate method.

The Company adjusted the recorded value of the Sentient Loan at the first partial conversion date and at March 31, 2016 to reflect the amortization of the loan discount and loan costs, shown as “Interest expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Company recorded a total noncash loss on debt extinguishment of $1.7 million reflecting the difference between the value of the shares issued to Sentient as a result of the February 11, 2016 conversion and the recorded value of the Sentient Loan, including related loan costs, loan discount and embedded derivative eliminated at the conversion date. The Company marked-to-market the embedded derivative at the February 11, 2016 conversion date and recorded a total derivative loss of $0.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Sentient Note had been fully converted and the Company adopted the 2013 Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “KELTIP”), which became effective immediately. The KELTIP provides for the grant of units (“KELTIP Units”) to certain officers and key employees of the Company, which units will, once vested, entitle such officers and employees to receive an amount, in cash or in Company common stock issued pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, measured generally by the price of the Company’s common stock on the settlement date. KELTIP Units are not an actual equity interest in the Company and are solely unfunded and unsecured obligations of the Company that are not transferable and do not provide the holder with any stockholder rights. Payment of the settlement amount of vested KELTIP Units is deferred generally until the earlier of a change of control of the Company or the date the grantee ceases to serve as an officer or employee of the Company.had no outstanding debt.

 

The KELTIP Units are marked to market at each reporting period. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 the Company had recorded liabilities of $93,000 and $81,000, respectively, related to KELTIP Unit grants which are included in accrued employee compensation and benefits in the table above.

11.Asset11.Asset Retirement and Reclamation Liabilities

 

The Company retained the services of a mining engineering firm to prepare a detailed closure plan for the Velardeña Properties. The plan was completed during the second quarter 2012 and indicated that the Company had an ARO and offsetting ARC of approximately $1.9 million.  The estimated $3.5 million ARO and ARC that was recorded at the time of the acquisition of the Velardeña Properties was adjusted accordingly.

 

F-20


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The Company will continue to accrue additional estimated ARO amounts based on an asset retirement plan as activities requiring future reclamation and remediation occur.  During the year ended December 31, 20142017 the Company recognized approximately $0.2 million of accretion expense and approximately $0.2 million$4,000 of amortization expense related to the ARC.

 

The following table summarizes activity in the Velardeña Properties ARO:

 

F-18


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

2,380

 

$

2,480

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in estimates, and other

 

 

(128)

 

 

(293)

 

Accretion expense

 

 

196

 

 

193

 

Ending balance

 

$

2,448

 

$

2,380

 


GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

2,467

 

$

2,080

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in estimates, and other

 

(85

)

203

 

Accretion expense

 

200

 

184

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

2,582

 

$

2,467

 

 

The decrease in the ARO recorded during the yearyears ended December 31, 20142017 and 2016 is the result of changes in assumptions related to inflation factors and discount rates used in the determination of future cash flows.

 

The increase in ARO recorded during the year ended December 31, 2013 relates to a change in assumption related to inflation factors used in the determination of future cash flows.  The corresponding increase in ARO was discounted using the Company’s current credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate.

The ARO set forth on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 20142017 and December 31, 20132016 include approximately $0.1 million$50,000 of reclamation liabilities related to activities at the El Quevar project in Argentina.

 

12.Other12.Other Liabilities

 

The Company recorded nil amounts of other current liabilities of approximately $2.6 million and $4.4 million at December 31, 20142017 and December 31, 2013, respectively.  The amounts are primarily related to a loss contingency on foreign withholding taxes that2016.  

During the government could assert are owed byfirst four months of 2016 the Company acting as withholding agent, on certain interest payments made to a third party. The amounts include estimated interest, penalties and other adjustments.

The December 31, 2014 amount also includes a net liability ofpaid approximately $0.2 million related to the Argentinaof Argentine tax on equity due for years 2009 through 2012 stemming from a tax auditleaving approximately $0.2 million of those years.  The amount includesestimated interest and penalties and is netawaiting a final assessment from the tax authorities.  During the third quarter 2016 the Argentine government adopted an amnesty program that the Company effectively used to eliminate the remaining $0.2 million of certain VAT credits due the Company.  The tax authorities have agreed in principle to offset a portion of the $0.9 million in tax, interest and penalties with approximately $0.7 million of VAT credits due the Company.  Should the Argentina tax authorities ultimately not allow a portion or allthat had been accrued.  The reversal of the VAT credits as an offset,accrual reduced expenses incurred at the liability could increase by as much as $0.7 million (see Note 20).El Quevar project during the third quarter 2016. 

 

13.Fair13.Fair Value Measurements

 

Financial assets and liabilities and nonfinancial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring (annual) basis under a framework of a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs into valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.  This hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs.  Further, financial assets and liabilities should be classified by level in their entirety based upon the lowest level of input that was significant to the fair value measurement.  The three levels of the fair value hierarchy per ASC 820 are as follows:

 

Level 1:  Unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that are accessible at the measurement date.

 

F-21


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Level 2:  Quoted prices in inactive markets for identical assets or liabilities, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, or other observable inputs either directly related to the asset or liability or derived principally from corroborated observable market data.

 

Level 3:  Unobservable inputs due to the fact that there is little or no market activity. This entails using assumptions in models which estimate what market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

 

F-19



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The Company has consistently applied the valuation techniques discussed in Notes 82, 10 and 915 in all periods presented.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis at fair value at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 by respective level of the fair value hierarchy:

 

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

At December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

8,579

 

$

 

$

 

$

8,579

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

8,579

 

$

 

$

 

$

8,579

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant liability

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,442

 

$

1,442

 

 

 

$

 

$

 

$

1,442

 

$

1,442

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

19,146

 

$

 

$

 

$

19,146

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

25

 

 

 

25

 

 

 

$

19,171

 

$

 

$

 

$

19,171

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

At December 31, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

3,250

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3,250

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

 

314

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

314

 

Short-term investments

 

 

238

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

238

 

 

 

$

3,802

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3,802

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

$

2,588

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

2,588

 

Trade accounts receivable

 

 

380

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

380

 

Trade accounts receivable - related party

 

 

643

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

643

 

Short-term investments

 

 

334

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

334

 

 

 

$

3,945

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

3,945

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Warrant liability - related party

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

976

 

$

976

 

Warrant liability

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

922

 

 

922

 

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

1,898

 

$

1,898

 

 

The Company’s cash equivalents, comprised principally of U.S. treasury securities, are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The Company’s trade accounts receivable isare classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy and isare related to the sale of metals at our Velardeña Properties and is valued at published metals pricesoxide plant lease per the terms of the refining and smelting agreements.lease rates established in the plant lease agreement.

 

At December 31, 20142016, the Company has recorded a liability for warrants to acquire the Company’s stock as a result of anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements that could result in a resetting of the warrant exercise price in the event the Company were to issue additional shares of its common stock in a future transaction at a an offering price lower than the current exercise price of the warrants (see Note 15). The Company assesses the fair value of its warrant liability at the end of each

F-22


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

reporting period, with changes in the value recorded as a separate line itemWarrant derivative (loss) gain on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.Loss. The valuation policies are approved by the Chief Financial Officer who reviews and approves the inputs used in the fair value calculations and the changes in fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness. Fair value measurements are discussed with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as deemed appropriate. The warrant liability hashad been recorded at fair value as of December 31, 20142016 based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  The valuation model takes into account the probability that the Company could issue additional shares in a future transaction at a lower price than the current exercise price of the warrants. SignificantThe Company did not have a warrant liability at December 31, 2017 as the result of a change in accounting principal during the period as discussed in Note 3.

The beneficial conversion feature of the Sentient Note represents an embedded derivative as defined by ASC 815 (see Note 10). ASC 815 provides that a derivative instrument’s fair value must be bifurcated from the host contract and separately recorded on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. At December 31, 2015 and at each of the conversion dates (see Note 10), the Company had recorded a derivative liability related to the beneficial conversion feature of the Sentient Note. On June 10, 2016, the remaining Sentient Note and related embedded derivative had been fully retired.  The Company assesses the fair value of the derivative liability at the end of each reporting period, with changes in the value recorded as “Derivative loss” on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The valuation policies are approved by the Chief Financial Officer who reviews and approves the inputs used in the fair value calculations and the changes in fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness. Fair value measurements are discussed with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as deemed appropriate. The derivative liability was recorded at fair value at December 31, 2015 and each of the conversion dates based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The valuation model takes into account, among other items: 1) the probability of successfully achieving stockholder approval of the loan’s conversion feature, 2) future variations in the Company’s stock price, and 3) the probability of entering into an equity transaction prior to the Loan maturity date that would lower the conversion price.

In addition to the warrant exercise prices (see Note 15) and Sentient Note conversion price (see Note 10) other significant inputs to the warrant valuation model and derivative valuation model included the Company’s closing stock price at December 31, 2014following as applicable:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

December 31,

 

 

 

2016

 

Company's ending stock price

 

$

0.58

 

Company's stock volatility

 

 

110%

 

Applicable risk free interest rate

 

 

1.39%

 

F-23


An increase or decrease in the Company’s stock price, in isolation, would result in a relatively lower or higher fair value measurement respectively.  A decrease in the probability of the issuance of additional common stock at a lower price than the current warrant exercise price would result in a lower value for the warrants.  The table below highlights the change in fair value of the warrant liability and the derivative liability.

 

F-20


 

 

 

 

 

    

    

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

 

 

 

Using Significant Unobservable

 

 

 

 

Inputs (Level 3)

 

 

 

Warrant Liabilities

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Ending balance at December 31, 2015

 

$

1,898

 

Change in estimated fair value

 

 

(364)

 

Ending balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

1,534

 


 

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

Fait Value Measurements

 

 

 

Using SignificantUnobservable

 

 

 

Inputs (level 3)

 

 

 

Warrant Liabilities

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Beginning balance at January 1, 2014

 

$

 

Adjustment to record 2012 warrants as a liability (Note 15)

 

163

 

Issuance of warrants

 

3,084

 

Change in estimated fair value

 

(1,693

)

Ending balance at December 31, 2014

 

$

1,554

 

The Company did not have any Level 2 or Level 3 financial assets atAt December 31, 2013.2017, the remaining warrants are recorded as equity as the result of a change in accounting principal as fully detailed in Note 3.

 

Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements

 

There were no non-recurring fair value measurements at December 31, 2014.

The following table summarizes the Company’s non-recurring fair value measurements at2017 or December 31, 2013 by respective level of the fair value hierarchy:2016.

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

At December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mineral properties

 

$

 

$

 

$

22,397

 

$

22,397

 

Exploration properties

 

 

 

2,993

 

2,993

 

 

 

$

 

$

 

$

25,390

 

$

25,390

 

 

The Company assesses the fair value of its long lived assets including goodwill, at least annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate a change in the fair value has occurred.  The valuation policies are approved by the Chief Financial Officer who reviews and approves the inputs used in the fair value calculations and the changes in fair value measurements from period to period for reasonableness. Fair value measurements are discussed with the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as deemed appropriate.

 

To determine theNo fair value of mineral propertiesadjustments to long lived assets were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and exploration properties the Company uses a market valuation approach which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The market valuation approach relies upon assumptions related to the condition and location of the properties in comparison to other corroborated observable market data for similar properties. In arriving at a fair value for the Velardeña mineral deposit and exploration properties and the San Diego exploration property, the Company considered recently published market data reflecting an average in the ground mineral resource value for a representative group of junior silver mining companies primarily located in Mexico and South America. See Note 8 for details related to the unobservable inputs.December 31, 2016.

 

F-21



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

14.Income14.Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740 “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”) on a tax jurisdictional basis.

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

 

2017

    

2016

CURRENT TAXES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

United States

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Other Countries

 

 

(2,450

)

 

 

13

 

 

 —

 

$

 

$

(2,450

)

 

$

13

 

$

 —

DEFERRED TAXES:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United States

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

Other Countries

 

 

(47,236

)

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

$

 

$

(47,236

)

Total Income Tax Provision (Benefit)

 

$

 

$

(49,686

)

Total income tax provision

 

$

13

 

$

 —

 

F-24


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Income (loss) from operations before income taxes by country consists of the following:

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

United States

 

$

(8,207

)

$

(8,632

)

Other Countries

 

(10,615

)

(281,434

)

 

 

$

(18,822

)

$

(290,066

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

United States

 

$

(7,197)

 

$

(11,732)

 

Other Countries

 

 

3,318

 

 

1,073

 

 

 

$

(3,879)

 

$

(10,659)

 

 

In 20142017 the Company recorded $13,000 of current tax expense stemming from taxable income of a subsidiary in Mexico, and no current taxes were recorded in 2016.  No deferred taxes were recorded in 2017 or deferred tax expense or benefit,2016, as any such tax expense or benefit incurred during the year has been offset against a change in the valuation allowance against prior year net operating lossesof various deferred tax assets in each country.  In 2013 the Company recorded a $47.2 million deferred tax benefit related primarily to the impairment of long lived assets of the Velardeña Properties, and recorded a current tax benefit of $2.5 million related to the effective settlement of an unrecognized tax benefit in Mexico.

 

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes computed at the statutory rate to the provision for income taxes as shown in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operationsOperations and comprehensive income (loss)Comprehensive Loss is summarized below.

 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Tax expense (benefit) at US rate of 34%

 

$

(6,400

)

$

(98,623

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

Non-deductibility of Goodwill impairment

 

 

3,500

 

Rate differential of other jurisdictions

 

301

 

11,047

 

Effects of foreign earnings

 

(2,238

)

(6,671

)

Change in valuation allowance

 

14,127

 

37,894

 

Provision to return true-ups

 

(18,826

)

 

Exchange rate changes on net deferred tax assets

 

13,605

 

 

Effect of a change in tax rates

 

 

3,153

 

Other

 

(569

)

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income tax provision

 

$

 

$

(49,686

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Tax expense (benefit) at US rate of 35%

 

$

(1,319)

 

$

(3,624)

 

Other adjustments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rate differential of other jurisdictions

 

 

(70)

 

 

(98)

 

Effects of foreign earnings

 

 

310

 

 

(786)

 

Change in valuation allowance

 

 

33,975

 

 

(4,690)

 

Provision to tax return true-ups

 

 

(33,720)

 

 

209

 

Exchange rate changes on deferred tax assets

 

 

(8,444)

 

 

8,802

 

Effect of a change in tax rates

 

 

11,516

 

 

(1,177)

 

Debt extinguishment loss

 

 

 —

 

 

550

 

Warrant liability loss

 

 

 —

 

 

838

 

Tax loss on sale of subsidiary

 

 

(1,693)

 

 

 —

 

Inflation adjustment on net operating losses

 

 

(2,491)

 

 

 —

 

Expired net operating losses

 

 

1,931

 

 

 —

 

Other

 

 

18

 

 

(24)

 

Income tax provision

 

$

13

 

$

 —

 

 

F-22


F-25



 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

The components of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

 

 

 

For the years ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

$

93,364

 

$

84,735

 

Stock-based compensation

 

1,943

 

1,691

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

13,990

 

7,838

 

Other

 

1,289

 

1,239

 

 

 

110,586

 

95,503

 

Less: Valuation allowance

 

(106,764

)

(92,637

)

Total deferred tax assets

 

3,822

 

2,866

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

(3,436

)

(2,388

)

Other

 

(386

)

(478

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

(3,822

)

(2,866

)

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the  year ended

 

 

 

December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Deferred tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net operating loss carryforwards

 

$

131,866

 

$

96,038

 

Stock-based compensation

 

 

517

 

 

1,435

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

4,307

 

 

7,545

 

Other

 

 

3,274

 

 

1,016

 

 

 

 

139,964

 

 

106,034

 

Less: Valuation allowance

 

 

(139,795)

 

 

(105,820)

 

Total deferred tax assets

 

 

169

 

 

214

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Property, plant and equipment

 

 

(169)

 

 

(195)

 

Other

 

 

 —

 

 

(19)

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

 

 

(169)

 

 

(214)

 

Net deferred tax asset (liability)

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

 

In accordance with ASC 740, the Company presents deferred tax assets net of its deferred tax liabilities on a tax jurisdictional basis on its Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The net deferred tax liability as of December 31, 20142017 and December 31, 20132016 was zero.

At the end of 2017 a new U.S. tax law was enacted, lowering the U.S. corporate tax rate to 21% from the top rate of 35% beginning in 2018.  The tax rate change resulted in a reduction of the Company’s U.S. deferred tax assets by $10.2 million.  The Company’s deferred tax assets are currently completely offset by a valuation allowance so the reduction in U.S. deferred tax assets has no impact on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017.  In addition, the new tax law imposes a transition tax on the accumulated earnings and profits of controlled foreign corporations (“CFC’s).  None of the Company’s CFCs currently have accumulated earnings and profits and therefore the Company has no transition tax liability.  No other provisions of the new tax law had a material impact on the Company’s financial statements for the period ended December 31, 2017.  Based on the Company’s current interpretation and subject to the release of the related regulations and any future interpretive guidance, the Company believes the effects of the change in the tax law incorporated herein are substantially complete.

 

At December 31, 20142017 the Company had net operating loss carryforwards in the U.S. and in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions totaling $312.9$484.9 million.  Of these, $100.6$83.9 million is related to the Velardeña Properties in Mexico and expireexpires in future years through 2024.  $23.12027,  $22.6 million is related to other Mexico exploration activities and also expireexpiring in future years through 2024.  $42.22027, $121.1 million net operating losses existexists in LuxembourgSpain and havehas no expiration date, while $95.8and $186.5 million existexists in other non-U.S. countries, which will expire in future years through 2034.2027.  In the U.S. there are $50.5$70.8 million of net operating loss carryforwards which will expire in future years through 2034.  A portion of the U.S. net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitations under Internal Revenue Code Section 382, relating to a change of control event triggered by the Company’s public offering of its common stock in March 2010.2037.

 

The valuation allowance offsetting the net deferred tax assets of the Company of $106.7$139.8 million and $92.6$105.8 million at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, relates primarily to the uncertain utilization of certain deferred tax assets, primarily net operating loss carryforwards, in various tax jurisdictions.  The Company continually assesses both

F-26


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

positive and negative evidence to determine whether it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets can be realized prior to their expiration.

 

The Company, a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries file tax returns in the United States and in various foreign jurisdictions.  The tax rules and regulations in these countries are highly complex and subject to interpretation.  The Company’s tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant taxing authorities and in connection with such examinations, disputes can arise with the taxing authorities over the interpretation or application of certain tax rules within the country involved.  In accordance with ASC 740, the Company identifies and evaluates uncertain tax positions, and recognizes the impact of uncertain tax positions for which there is less than a more-likely-than-not probability of the position being upheld upon review by the relevant taxing authority.  Such positions are deemed to be “unrecognized tax benefits” which require additional disclosure and recognition of a liability within the financial statements.  If recognized, none of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the Company’s effective tax rate.

 

F-23



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The Company had no unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2014 and 2013.  During 2013 an unrecognized tax benefit of $2.5 million was effectively settled with taxing authorities.  Below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits, which excludes any estimated penalties and interest.interest on all identified unrecognized tax benefits.  The Company’s unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are completely offset by net deferred tax benefits and therefore do not appear on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period

 

$

1,668

 

$

2,841

 

Increases for tax positions taken during prior years

 

 

 

17

 

Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

 

(889

)

Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations

 

(505

)

(301

)

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of period

 

$

1,163

 

$

1,668

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at beginning of period

 

$

740

 

$

937

 

Increases for tax positions taken during prior years

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations

 

 

(154)

 

 

(197)

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits at end of period

 

$

586

 

$

740

 

 

Tax years as early as 20092012 remain open and are subject to examination in the Company’s principal tax jurisdictions.  The Company does not expect a significant change to its net unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12 months.  No interest and penalties were recognized in the statementConsolidated Statement of operationsOperations and Comprehensive Loss for the year 2014. The total amount of interest and penalties recognized in the statement of operations for 2013 is an income tax benefit of $1.3 million,ended December 31, 2017 or 2016, and there arewere no interest and penalties recognized in the statement of financial position as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.  The Company classifies income tax related interest and penalties as income tax expense.

 

15.15.EquityEquity

 

Registered offeringCancellation of Treasury Shares

Pursuant to the terms of an agreement between the Company and ECU, relating to the merger of the two companies on September 2, 2011, ECU shareholders had the right to receive 0.05 shares of the Company’s common stock for each share of ECU common stock held. On the sixth anniversary following the merger any unconverted shares expired per the terms of the agreement. Accordingly, during December 2017, ECU shares being held for conversion, representing 125,739 shares of the Company, were returned to treasury and canceled. 

F-27


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Consideration Shares

 

On September 10, 2014August 2, 2017, the Company completed a registered public offering (the “Offering”)granted Hecla an option to extend the oxide plant lease for an additional period of 3,692,000 Units (the “Units”), with each Unit consisting of one shareup to two years (see Note 16).  As partial consideration for the option Hecla purchased $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares, of the Company’s common stock (the “Shares”“Consideration Shares”), issued at a price of $0.55 per share, which was the undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price. The Consideration Shares were offered and sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) in reliance on the exemptions provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Act and/or Regulation D promulgated thereunder.  Under the terms of the Option Agreement (defined herein), the Company agreed to register with the SEC the resale of the Consideration Shares.  A resale registration statement with the SEC became effective in September 2017.  The $1.0 million received for the Consideration Shares, net of $71,000 in legal and a warrantstock exchange issuance fees, has been recorded as equity in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017.

At the Market Offering Agreement

In December 2016, the Company entered into an at-the-market offering agreement (as amended from time to purchase .50 of a sharetime, the “ATM Agreement”) with H. C. Wainwright & Co., LLC (“Wainwright”), under which the Company may, from time to time, issue and sell shares of the Company’s common stock through Wainwright as sales manager in an at-the-market offering under a prospectus supplement for aggregate sales proceeds of up to $5.0 million (the “Warrants”“ATM Program”). Each Unit was priced at $0.86 per Unit, before discount or a maximum of 10 million shares.  On September 29, 2017, the Company entered into an amendment to the underwriters. The Warrants become exercisableATM Agreement with Wainwright to reflect a new registration statement on March 11, 2015 at an exercise price of $1.21 per share and will expire on September 10, 2019, five years from the date of issuance. The Shares and the Warrants are immediately separable and were issued separately. The Company received net proceeds from the Offering of approximately $2.7 million after the underwriter commissions and expenses of approximately $0.5 million.

In arriving at the value of the Shares and Warrants the Company first valued and recorded the Warrants as a liability on the balance sheet as a result of anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements that could result in a resetting of the warrant exercise price in the event the Company were to issue additionalForm S-3 (File No. 333-220461) under which shares of its common stock in a future transaction at a an offering price lower than the current exercise price of the warrants. A third party expert determined a value for the Warrants at September 4, 2014, the date prior to the announcement of the Offering, using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 13). The valuation model takes into account the probability that the Company could issue additional shares in a future transaction at a lower price than the current exercise price of the Warrants. Significant inputs to the valuation model included the Company’s closing stock price at September 4, 2014 of $1.01, the exercise price for the Warrants disclosed above, the Company’s stock volatility measured as of September 4, 2014, the applicable risk free interest rate of 1.6%, and the probability of an additional issuance of the Company’s common stock may be sold under the ATM Program.  The ATM Agreement will remain in full force and effect until the earlier of December 31, 2018, or the date that the ATM Agreement is terminated in accordance with the terms therein. Offers or sales of common shares under the ATM Program will be made only in the United States and no offers or sales of common shares under the ATM Agreement will be made in Canada. The common stock will be distributed at the market prices prevailing at the time of sale. As a result, prices of the common stock sold under the ATM Program may vary as between purchasers and during the period of distribution. The ATM Agreement provides that Wainwright will be entitled to compensation for its services at a lower price than the current warrant exercise price. The fair valuecommission rate of 2.0% of the Warrants was determinedgross sales price per share of common stock sold.  The Company reimbursed certain legal expenses of Wainwright totaling $50,000 and incurred additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs of approximately $109,000 in connection with establishing the ATM Program.  Such costs have been deferred and will be amortized to be $1.2 million, withequity as sales are completed under the remaining $1.5 million of net proceeds fromATM Program. At December 31, 2017, unamortized costs totaling $136,000 appear on the Offering being allocated to additional paid in capital.accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Prepaid expense and other assets.”

 

Private placementDuring the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company sold an aggregate of approximately 1,024,000 common shares under the ATM Program at an average price of $0.70 per common share for gross proceeds of approximately $720,000. The Company paid cash commissions and other nominal transaction fees to Wainwright totaling approximately $16,000 or 2.2% of the gross proceeds and amortized approximately $23,000 of deferred accounting, legal and regulatory costs resulting in a net amount of approximately $682,000 that has been recorded as equity in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company also incurred approximately $34,000 in additional accounting, legal, and regulatory costs associated with the ATM Program that were included in “General and administrative costs” in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

Sentient Note conversion

 

On September 10, 2014February 11, 2016, Sentient converted approximately $3.9 million of principal and $0.1 million of accrued interest (representing the Company also completed a private placement (the “Private Placement”) with The Sentient Group (“Sentient”),total amount of accrued interest at the Company’s largest stockholder, pursuant to which Sentient purchased, pursuant to Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, a total of 5,800,000 Units (the “Private Placement Units”), with each Private Placement Unit consisting of one shareconversion date) into 23,355,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and a warrant to purchase 0.50Company's

F-28


Following the completion of the Private Placement and the Offering, Sentient holds approximately 27.2% (on a non-diluted basis) of the Company’s outstanding common stock (excluding restricted common stock held by the Company’s employees).

In arriving at the value of the Shares and Warrants the Company first valued and recorded the Warrants as a liability on the balance sheet as a result of anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements that could result in a resetting of the warrant exercise price in the event the Company were to issue additional shares of its common stock in a future transaction at a an offering price lower than the current exercise price of approximately $0.172 per share, reflecting 90% of the warrants. A third party expert determined a value for15-day VWAP immediately preceding the Warrantsconversion date. On June 10, 2016, Sentient converted the remaining approximately $1.1 million of principal and approximately $34,000 of accrued interest (representing the total amount of accrued interest at September 4, 2014, the date priorconversion date) pursuant to the announcementSentient Note into 4,011,740 shares of the Offering, using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy (see Note 13). The valuation model takes into account the probability that the Company could issue additional shares in a future transactionCompany's common stock at a lower price than the currentan exercise price of approximately $0.289 per share, equal to 90% of the Warrants. Significant inputs to15day VWAP immediately preceding the valuation model included the Company’s closing stock price at September 4, 2014 of $1.01, the exercise price for the Warrants disclosed above, the Company’s stock volatility measured as ofloan’s original issue date (see Note 10).  At September 30, 2014,2016 the applicable risk free interest rate of 1.6%,Sentient Note had been fully converted and the probabilityCompany had no further debt outstanding. After conversion, and following the sale of an additional issuanceshares of the Company’s common stock in 2017 pursuant to the ATM Program (discussed above), Sentient holds approximately 45% of the Company’s 91.9 million shares of issued and outstanding common stock.

Offering and Private Placement

On May 6, 2016, the Company issued 8.0 million registered shares of common stock at a lowerpurchase price thanof $0.50 per share in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) resulting in gross proceeds of $4.0 million. The Company incurred costs and fees of approximately $0.4 million related to the currentOffering, resulting in net proceeds of approximately $3.6 million.  In connection with the Offering, each investor received in a private placement an unregistered warrant to purchase threequarters of a share of common stock for each share of common stock purchased. The 6.0 million warrants have an exercise price. price of $0.75 per share and are exercisable beginning six months after the date of issuance and will expire five years from the initial exercise date. 

The net proceeds of the Offering were recorded in equity and appear as a separate line item in the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity. Using the Black Scholes model, the fair value of the Warrantswarrants issued was determined$3.6 million, considering the closing stock price on April 29, 2016 (the first business day preceding May 2, 2016, the date the Company entered into a definitive agreement to be $1.9 million, withissue the remaining $2.7 millionshares), the exercise price and exercise period of net proceeds from the Offering being allocated to additional paid in capital.warrants, the Company’s volatility rate of 105%, and the applicable risk free rate of 0.74%.

 

Equity Incentive Plans

 

In May 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved amendments to the Company’s 2009 Equity Incentive Plan, adopting the Amended and Restated 2009 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”), pursuant to which awards of the Company’s common stock may be made to officers, directors, employees, consultants and agents of the Company and its subsidiaries.  The Company recognizes stock-based compensation costs using a graded vesting attribution method whereby costs are recognized over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award.

 

F-29


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s restricted stock grants issued under the Equity Plan at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 and changes during the years then ended:

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Restricted Stock Grants

 

Number of
Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share

 

Number of
Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

915,971

 

$

2.47

 

823,500

 

$

5.67

 

Granted during the year

 

140,000

 

0.52

 

637,000

 

0.76

 

Restrictions lifted during the year

 

(455,133

)

3.18

 

(200,029

)

6.54

 

Forfeited during the year

 

 

 

(344,500

)

4.60

 

Outstanding at end of year

 

600,838

 

$

1.48

 

915,971

 

$

2.47

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted 

    

 

    

Weighted 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant 

 

 

 

Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 Date Fair 

 

 

 

Grant Date 

 

 

 

Number of 

 

 Value Per 

 

Number of 

 

Fair Value 

 

Restricted Stock Grants

 

Shares

 

 Share

 

Shares

 

Per Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

100,000

 

$

0.63

 

84,170

 

$

0.46

 

Granted during the period

 

200,000

 

 

0.53

 

100,000

 

 

0.63

 

Restrictions lifted during the period

 

(96,666)

 

 

0.60

 

(84,170)

 

 

0.46

 

Forfeited during the period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

203,334

 

$

0.55

 

100,000

 

$

0.63

 

 

In connection with performance and reductions in work force,During the Company’s Compensation Committee and Board of Directors approved a 10% annual salary reduction effective June 1, 2013 for certain officers of the Company. In conjunction with the salary reduction, to be in effect for one year the Compensation Committee approved a grant of an aggregate of 149,500 restricted shares to the officers effective June 1, 2013. The stock vested one year from the grant date. In addition, 2,500 shares of restricted stock were granted to a new employee hired during the period.  One third of the restricted stock granted to the employee vests on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant dates, provided the employee continues to serve the Company at that time.  The remaining 485,000 shares were granted to officers duringended December 2013 as a portion of their annual compensation. One third of the December 201331, 2017 restricted stock grants will vest on each ofwere made to two employees. During the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant dates, provided the officer continuesyear ended December 31, 2016 restricted stock grants were made to serve the Company at that time.three employees.

 

Restrictions were lifted on 444,63346,666 shares during the year ended December 31, 20142017 on the anniversaries of grants made to officers andthree employees in prior years and restrictions were liftedyears.  In addition, during 2017, 50,000 shares of a 150,000 share grant to a new employee vested on an additional 10,500 shares during 2014 in connection with the termination of employment of two employees.grant date. Restrictions were lifted on 187,62984,170 shares during the year ended December 31, 20132016 on the anniversaries of grants made to two officers and employees in prior years and restrictions were lifted on an additional 12,400 shares during 2013 related to an employee’s retirement.

Included in the forfeitures for 2013 are 199,500 unvested shares related to the resignation of two officers of the Company during the year. Also, included in the forfeitures for 2013 are 145,000 unvested shares that were surrendered to the Company on December 13, 2013 by an officer of the Company.  The surrender is the result of the determination by the Board of Directors of the Company that the officer had been granted shares of common stock during 2012 in excess of the 150,000 share limit per the Equity Plan on grants to any one individual in one calendar year. In addition the officer also surrendered 27,500 vested shares that were granted in 2010 and vested in 2011 that were also

F-25



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

determined to be in excess of the 150,000 share limit. Per the terms of a Stock Surrender and Grant Agreement entered into on December 13, 2013 with the officer, the officer was granted 172,500 KELTIP Units (see Note 10).years. 

 

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2014 and 20132017 the Company recognized approximately $0.5$0.1 million and $1.0 million, respectively,of compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants. For the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recognized a nominal amount of compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants.  The Company expects to recognize additionalapproximately $0.1 million of compensation expense related to these awards of approximately $0.2 milliongrants over the next 35 months.

 

The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s stock option grants issued under the Equity Plan at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 and changes during the years then ended:

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Equity Plan Options

 

Number of
Shares

 

Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value Per
Share

 

Number of
Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

110,810

 

$

8.02

 

118,810

 

$

8.02

 

Granted during the year

 

 

 

 

 

Restrictions lifted during the year

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited during the year

 

(15,000

)

$

8.00

 

(8,000

)

$

8.00

 

Outstanding at end of year

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

110,810

 

$

8.02

 

Exercisable at end of period

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

110,810

 

$

8.02

 

Granted and vested

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

110,810

 

$

8.02

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted

    

 

    

Weighted

 

 

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

Average

 

 

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

Exercise

 

 

 

Number of 

 

Price Per 

 

Number of 

 

Price Per 

 

Equity Plan Options

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of period

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

245,810

 

$

3.47

 

Granted during the period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Forfeited or expired during period

 

(55,500)

 

 

8.00

 

(150,000)

 

 

0.56

 

Exercised during period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Outstanding at end of period

 

40,310

 

$

8.05

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

Exercisable at end of period

 

40,310

 

$

8.05

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

Granted and vested

 

40,310

 

$

8.05

 

95,810

 

$

8.02

 

 

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model using the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatilities of the Company’s shares. The Company uses historical datadoes not expect to estimate option exercises and forfeitures within the Black-Scholes model. The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, based on past experience and future estimates and includes datarecord any additional expense related to both employees directors. The risk-free rate for periods within the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company currently does not foresee the payment of dividends in the near term.these options.

 

Grant Date

April 12

2010

Expected volatility

73.20

%

Weighted average volatility

73.20

%

Expected dividend yield

Expected term (in years)

5

Risk-free rate

1.50

%

F-30


 

The options that expired during 2014 were options issued to former ECU stock option holders to replace options previously issued to them by ECU.Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

Also, pursuant to the Equity Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Non-Employee Director’s Deferred Compensation and Equity Award Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”).  Pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan the non-employee directors receive a portion of their compensation in the form of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) issued under the Equity Plan. The RSUs vest on the first anniversary of the grant and each vested RSU entitles the director to receive one unrestricted share of common stock upon the termination of the director’s board service.

 

The following table summarizes the status of the RSU grants issued under the Deferred Compensation Plan at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 and changes during the years then ended:

 

F-26


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

    

 

    

Weighted 

    

 

    

Weighted 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Grant 

 

 

 

Average 

 

 

 

 

 

 Date Fair 

 

 

 

Grant Date 

 

 

 

Number of 

 

 Value Per 

 

Number of 

 

Fair Value 

 

Restricted Stock Units

 

Shares

 

 Share

 

Shares

 

Per Share

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

1,607,317

 

$

1.28

 

1,245,285

 

$

1.66

 

Granted during the period

 

280,000

 

 

0.48

 

530,000

 

 

0.42

 

Restrictions lifted during the period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

(167,968)

 

 

1.40

 

Forfeited during the period

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

1,887,317

 

$

1.16

 

1,607,317

 

$

1.28

 


GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Restricted Stock Units 

 

Number of
Underlying
Shares

 

Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share

 

Number of
Underlying
Shares

 

Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Per Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

585,285

 

$

2.97

 

143,995

 

$

7.21

 

Granted during the year

 

350,000

 

0.58

 

441,290

 

1.59

 

Restrictions lifted during the year

 

 

 

 

 

Forfeited during the year

 

 

 

 

 

Outstanding at end of year

 

935,285

 

$

2.08

 

585,285

 

$

2.97

 

 

For the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 the Company recognized approximately $0.4$0.1 million and $0.6$0.2 million respectively, of compensation expense, respectively related to the RSU grants.  The Company expects to recognize additional compensation expense related to the RSU grants of approximatelyless than $0.1 million over the next six months.

 

Restrictions lifted on 167,968 RSU shares during 2016 all relate to the retirement of Michael T. Mason from the Company’s Board of Directors during the year.

Key Employee Long-Term Incentive Plan

Pursuant to the KELTIP (see Note 10)9), KELTIP Units may be granted to certain officers and key employees of the Company, which units will, once vested, entitle such officers and employees to receive an amount in cash or in Company common stock measured generally by the price of the Company’s Company's common stock on the settlement date. The KELTIP Units are recorded as a liability as discussed in detail in Note 10.9.

 

During the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company awarded 435,000 KELTIP Units to two officers of the Company and recorded approximately $0.2 million of compensation expense, included in “Stock based compensation” in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2017, the KELTIP Units were marked-to-market and the Company recognized approximately a $0.1 million reduction of compensation expense. At December 31, 2017 1,020,000 KELTIP Units were outstanding.

During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company awarded 585,000 KELTIP Units to two officers of the Company and recorded approximately $0.2 million of compensation expense, included in “Stock based compensation” in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2016 the KELTIP Units were marked-to-market and the Company recognized approximately $0.1 million of additional compensation expense. At December 31, 2016 585,000 KELTIP Units were outstanding.

F-31


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

Common stock warrants

 

The following table summarizes the status of the Company’s common stock warrants at December 31, 20142017 and December 31, 2013216, and the changes during the years then ended:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

 

 

Weighted 

 

 

 

Weighted 

 

 

For the Year Ended December 31,

 

 

Number of

 

Average Exercise 

 

Number of

 

Average Exercise 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

Underlying

 

Price Per

 

Underlying

 

Price Per

 

Common Stock Warrants

 

Number of
Underlying
Shares

 

Weighted Average
Exercise Price Per
Share

 

Number of
Underlying Shares

 

Weighted
Average Exercise
Price Per Share

 

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Shares

 

Share

 

Outstanding at beginning of year

 

5,263,578

 

$

12.10

 

5,263,578

 

$

12.10

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

 

17,578,950

 

$

2.17

 

8,777,409

 

$

3.96

 

Granted during period

 

4,746,000

 

1.21

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

6,000,000

 

 

0.75

 

Dilution adjustment

 

599,760

 

7.17

 

 

 

 

157,302

 

 

 

 

2,801,541

 

 

 —

 

Expired during period

 

(1,831,929

)

19.00

 

 

 

 

(6,258,080)

 

 

4.62

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Exercised during period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

Outstanding at end of year

 

8,777,409

 

$

3.95

 

5,263,578

 

$

12.10

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

 

11,478,172

 

$

0.81

 

17,578,950

 

$

2.17

 

 

The warrants granted during the period are relatedrelate to the Offeringprior registered offerings and Private Placementprivate placements of the Company’s securities completed on September 10, 2014 as discussed above.

stock.  In September 2012, the Company closed on both a registered public offering and concurrent private placement with Sentient in which it sold units, consisting of one share of common stock and a five-year warrant to acquire one half of a share of common stock at an exercise price of $8.42 per share. A total of 3,431,649 warrant shares were issued and became exercisable on March 20, 2013 and expired on September 19, 2017, five years from the date of issuance.

In September 2014 the Company closed on both a registered public offering and concurrent private placement with Sentient in which it sold units, consisting of one share (the “September 2012 Warrants”). Pursuantof common stock and a five-year warrant to certain dilution adjustment provisions inacquire one half of a share of common stock at an exercise price of $1.21 per share.  A total of 4,746,000 warrant shares were issued that became exercisable on March 11, 2015 and will expire on September 10, 2019, five years from the warrant agreement governingdate of issuance.

In May 2016, the September 2012 Warrants, the number ofCompany issued 8.0 million registered shares of common stock issuable upon exerciseat a purchase price of $0.50 per share in a registered direct offering (the “Offering”) resulting in gross proceeds of $4.0 million. In connection with the September 2012 Warrants was increased from 3,431,649Offering, each investor received an unregistered warrant to purchase threequarters of a share of common stock for each share of common stock purchased. The resulting 6,000,000 warrant shares to 4,031,409 shares (599,760 share increase) and thehave an exercise price was reduced from $8.42of $0.75 per share, to $7.17 per share pursuant to a weighted average dilution calculation basedbecame exercisable on November 7, 2016 and will expire on November 6, 2021, five years from the pricing of the Offering and the Private Placement.initial exercise date.

 

The warrants that expired during 2014 were warrants related to the merger with ECU on September 2, 2011 and were issued to former ECU warrant holders to replace warrants previously issued to them by ECU.

F-27



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The warrants issued in September 2012 and September 2014 are being recorded as a liability on the balance sheet as a result ofwarrant agreements contain anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements that could result in a resetting of the warrant exercise price and the number of warrant shares outstanding in the event the Company were to issue additional shares of its common stock in a future transaction at a an offering price lower than the current exercise price of the warrants.  As a result of the subsequent issuance of the Company’s common stock in separate transactions, including the September 2014 registered public offering and private placement, the conversion of the Sentient Note, the May 2016 Offering and private placement, the ATM Program and the Hecla Share Issuance (defined herein) the exercise price of the 2012 and 2014 warrants has been adjusted downward. As a result of these transactions, the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the September 2012 warrants, prior to their expiration on September 19, 2017, had increased from the original 3,431,649 shares to 6,258,080 shares (2,826,431 share increase) and the exercise price has been reduced from the original $8.42 per share to $4.62 per share. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the September 2014 warrants has increased from the original 4,746,000 shares to 5,478,172 shares (732,172 share increase) and the exercise price has been reduced from the original $1.21 per share to $0.87 per share.

F-32


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

The warrants issued in September 2012 and September 2014 were recorded as a liability on the balance sheet at December 31, 2016, as a result of anti-dilution clauses in the warrant agreements as discussed above. The May 2016 warrants are not subject to anti-dilution and the warrants are recorded as equity.  At December 31, 20142016, the total liability recorded for the 2012 and 2014 warrants was $1.6approximately $1.9 million, consisting of $1.5approximately $1.8 million for the 2014 warrants and $0.1 million for the 2012 warrants.  The September 2012 warrants expired during 2017 and as a result of a change in accounting principle the September 2014 warrants were recorded in equity on the balance sheet at December 31, 2017 (see Note 3).   As a result, the Company did not record a warrant liability at December 31, 2017. 

16.Revenue, Deferred Revenue and Related Costs

Oxide Plant Lease and Oxide Plant Lease Costs

For the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company recorded revenue of approximately $6.7 million and related costs of approximately $2.2 million associated with the lease of the Velardeña Properties oxide plant. The Company recognizes oxide plant lease fees and reimbursements for labor, utility and other costs as “Revenue: Oxide plant lease” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss following the guidance of ASC 605 regarding "income statement characterization of reimbursements received for "out-of-pocket expenses incurred" and "reporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent".  ASC 605 supports recording as gross revenue fees received for the reimbursement of expenses in situations where the recipient is the primary obligor and has certain discretion in the incurrence of the reimbursable expense. The actual costs incurred for reimbursed direct labor and utility costs are reported as “Oxide plant lease costs” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. The Company recognizes lease fees during the period the fees are earned per the terms of the lease.

During August 2017, the Company granted Hecla an option to extend the oxide plant lease for an additional period of up to two years ending no later than December 31, 2020 (the “Extension Period”) in exchange for a $1.0 million upfront cash payment and the purchase of $1.0 million, or approximately 1.8 million shares, of the Company’s common stock, issued at a price of $0.55 per share, which was the undiscounted 30-day volume weighted average stock price (see Note 15).  The option and lease extension were memorialized in (i) an Option Agreement dated August 2, 2017 among the Company and Hecla Mining Company (the “Option Agreement”), and (ii) a Second Amendment to Master Agreement and Lease Agreement dated August 2, 2017 among Minera William S.A. de C.V., an indirect subsidiary of the Company, and Minera Hecla S.A.  de C.V., an indirect subsidiary of Hecla Mining Company (the “Second Amendment”). Under the Second Amendment, Hecla must exercise the option to extend the lease no later than October 3, 2018.  All of the fixed fees and throughput related charges remain the same as under the original lease.  Similar volume limitations apply to any required future tailings expansions, which Hecla will fund, leaving unused at the end of the lease term an agreed amount of capacity in the expanded tailings facility.  Pursuant to the Second Amendment, Hecla will have the right to terminate the lease during the Extension Period for any reason with 120 days’ notice.  Hecla will also have a one-time right of first refusal to continue to lease the plant following a termination notice through December 31, 2020 if the Company decides to use the oxide plant for its own purposes before December 31, 2020.

The Company expects to recognize the $1.0 million of income from granting the option over the expected life of the lease from August 2, 2017 through December 31, 2020 on a straight-line basis, including such income in “Other operating income” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.  As of December 31, 2017, the unamortized portion of the lease option payment totaled approximately $0.9 million recorded as short and long term “Deferred revenue” on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The $1.0 million received for the Consideration Shares, net of $71,000 in legal and stock exchange issuance fees, has been recorded as equity in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017.

F-33


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

For the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recorded revenue of approximately $6.4 million and related costs of approximately $2.0 million associated with the lease of the Velardeña Properties oxide plant.

17.Interest and Other Income

For the year ended December 31, 2017 the Company had only a nominal amount of interest and other income, primarily related to interest on amounts receivable from the sale of mining equipment as discussed in Note 8.

For the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company reported interest and other income of $0.4 million, which is primarily related to a refund of previously paid social security taxes in Mexico.

18.Derivative Loss

During the year ended December 31, 2016 the Company recorded approximately $1.7 million of warrant derivative loss related to an increase in the fair value of the liability recorded for warrants to acquire the Company’s common stock (see Note 13).  The warrant liability at December 31, 2016 was recorded at fair value as of December 31, 2014 based primarily on a valuation performed by a third partythird-party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.hierarchy (see Note 13). The third party valuation model takes into account the probability that the Company could issue additional shares in a future transaction at a lower price than the current exercise price of the warrants. Significant inputs to the third party valuation model included the Company’s closing stock price at December 31, 2014 of $0.54, the exercise prices for the warrants disclosed above, the Company’s stock volatility of 90%, the applicable risk free interest rate of 1.6%, and the probability of an additional issuance of the Company’s common stock at a lower price than the current warrant exercise price.price and the inputs in the table below for the respective periods. The balances forCompany did not have a warrant liability paid-in capital, and accumulated earnings also reflect an adjustment made during 2014 to reflectat December31, 2017 as the impact of recording the 2012 warrants as a liability.  Paid in capital and accumulated deficit were reduced by $15.6 million $15.5 million respectively and warrant liability was increased by $0.2 million. The adjustments were determined to be immaterial to the Company’s financial statements filed in prior periods.

16.Sale of Metals and Cost of Metals Sold

During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company sold marketable products including concentrates and precipitates from its Velardeña Properties. During 2014 and 2013 the Company sold marketable products to five customers.  Under the terms of the Company’s agreement with one precipitate customer, title does not pass to the purchaser until the product is received by the refinery, at which point revenue is recognized. For the Company’s other customers, title generally passes when a provisional payment is made, which occurs generally after the product is shipped and customary sales documents are completed.  Costs related to the sale of metals products include direct and indirect costs incurred to mine, process and market the products.  At December 31, 2014 the Company had written down its metals and in-process inventories to net realizable value including a charge to the cost of metals sold of approximately $1.2 million and a charge to depreciation expense of approximately $0.7 million. The Company had no metals inventory at December 31, 2013 as a result of a change in accounting principal during the suspension of mining and processing at its Velardeña Properties (seeperiod as discussed in Note 1).

17.Interest and Other Income

For the year ended December 31, 2014 the Company reported other income of $1.6 million related primarily to the reduction of a loss contingency liability related to foreign withholding taxes that the government could assert are owed by the Company, acting as withholding agent, on certain interest payments made to a third party (see Note 12).

The Company recorded interest and other income of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, primarily related to the reduction of a loss contingency liability related to foreign withholding taxes that the government could assert are owed by the Company, acting as withholding agent, on certain interest payments made to a third party (see Note 12).

18.Warrant Income3.

 

During the year ended December 31, 20142016 the Company recorded approximately $1.7$0.8 million of other incomederivative loss related to a decreasean increase in the fair value of the derivative liability recorded for warrantsrelated to acquire the Company’s stock (see Note 15).Sentient Loan. The warrantderivative liability has beenwas recorded at fair value asat June 10, 2016, the date of December 31, 2014the conversion of the remaining note (see Note 10), based primarily on a valuation performed by a third party expert using a Monte Carlo simulation, which falls within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  The valuation model takes into account the probability that the Company could issue additional shares in a future transaction at a lower price than the current exercise price of the warrants.hierarchy (see Note 13).  Significant inputs to the valuation model included the Company’s closing stock price at December 31, 2014 of $0.54, the exercise prices for the warrants disclosed above,included: 1) future variations in the Company’s stock volatility of 90%, the applicable risk free interest rate of 1.6%,price, and 2) the probability of entering into an additional issuance ofequity transaction prior to the Company’s common stock at aloan maturity date that would lower price than the current warrant exerciseconversion price.  At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Sentient Loan had been fully converted.

 

F-28


F-34



 

Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

19.Cash19.Cash flow information

 

The following table reconciles net income (loss)loss for the period to cash fromused in operations:

 

 

 

The Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(18,823

)

$

(240,380

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

Amortization and depreciation

 

3,128

 

6,927

 

Loss on sale of investments

 

 

133

 

Gain on sale of assets, net

 

(689

)

(3,626

)

Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

200

 

184

 

Asset write off

 

138

 

30

 

Write off of loss contingency

 

(1,645

)

(2,450

)

Decrease in warrant liability

 

(1,693

)

 

Impairment of long lived assets

 

 

243,985

 

Impairment of goodwill

 

 

11,666

 

Deferred income taxes

 

 

(47,634

)

Foreign exchange gain on loss contingency

 

(281

)

(8

)

Foreign exchange loss on deferred tax liability

 

 

562

 

Stock compensation

 

926

 

1,555

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease in trade accounts receivable

 

25

 

1,266

 

Decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets

 

287

 

86

 

(Increase) decrease in inventories

 

(764

)

2,511

 

Decrease in value added tax receivable (net)

 

449

 

2,658

 

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued Liabilities

 

358

 

(5,159

)

Increase (decrease) in deferred leasehold payments

 

42

 

(140

)

Increase in reclamation liability

 

(117

)

(44

)

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(18,459

)

$

(27,878

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

    

2017

    

2016

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net loss

 

$

(3,892)

 

$

(10,659)

 

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

 

952

 

 

1,548

 

Accretion of asset retirement obligation

 

 

196

 

 

193

 

Write off of loss contingency, net

 

 

 —

 

 

(212)

 

Asset write off

 

 

 —

 

 

24

 

Gain on reduction of asset retirement obligation

 

 

(56)

 

 

 —

 

Gain on sale of assets

 

 

(608)

 

 

(1,791)

 

Amortization of deferred loan costs

 

 

 —

 

 

57

 

Warrant liability fair market adjustment

 

 

 —

 

 

1,688

 

Derivative liability fair market adjustment

 

 

 —

 

 

778

 

Accretion of loan discount

 

 

 —

 

 

372

 

Loss on debt extinguishment

 

 

 —

 

 

1,653

 

Stock compensation

 

 

296

 

 

593

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Decrease in trade accounts receivable

 

 

683

 

 

166

 

Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets

 

 

(142)

 

 

(152)

 

Decrease in inventories

 

 

 3

 

 

85

 

(Increase) decrease in value added tax recoverable, net

 

 

(149)

 

 

346

 

Increase in accrued interest payable net of amounts capitalized

 

 

 —

 

 

85

 

Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue

 

 

892

 

 

(500)

 

Decrease in reclamation liability

 

 

(8)

 

 

(11)

 

Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 

 

226

 

 

(450)

 

Decrease in deferred leasehold payments

 

 

(23)

 

 

(18)

 

Net cash used in operating activities

 

$

(1,630)

 

$

(6,205)

 

 

The Company did not make any cash payments for interest or income taxes during the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

 

F-35


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

20.Commitments20.Commitments and Contingencies

 

Leases and Purchase Commitments —The

The Company has non-cancelable operating lease commitments as follows:

 

 

2015

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

El Quevar mining concessions (estimated)

 

$

110

 

$

110

 

$

110

 

$

110

 

$

110

 

$

 

Velardeña mining consessions (estimated)

 

$

12

 

$

12

 

$

12

 

$

12

 

$

12

 

$

 

Office space

 

$

270

 

$

242

 

$

248

 

$

255

 

$

239

 

$

 

Dedicated communications link

 

$

70

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

Purchase option agreement

 

$

550

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

2018

    

2019

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

    

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

El Quevar mining concessions (estimated)

 

$

93

 

$

93

 

$

93

 

$

93

 

$

93

 

$

 

Velardeña mining concessions (estimated)

 

$

70

 

$

70

 

$

70

 

$

70

 

$

70

 

$

 

Office space

 

$

293

 

$

274

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 —

 

$

 

 

The Company is required to make payments to the ArgentineanArgentine government to maintain its rights to the El Quevar mining concessions. The Company has made such payments totaling approximately $35,000$111,000 and $34,000$116,000 for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

F-29



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

 

The Company is required to pay concession holding fees to the Mexican government to maintain its rights to the Velardeña Properties mining concessions. During the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016 the Company made such payments totaling approximately $12,000$69,000 and $9,000, respectively.  The$74,000 respectively, and annual payments include payments made related to adjacent exploration concessions on which there is no current mining.under its surface right agreement with the local ejido of approximately $25,000.

 

The Company has office leases for its corporate headquarters in Golden, Colorado, as well as for its Velardeña Properties offices in Mexico, and exploration offices in Mexico and Argentina.  The lease for the corporate headquarters office space was renegotiated and extended during the first quarter 2014. The new lease reflects an approximately 46% reduction in space and an approximately 44% reduction in cost beginning March 1, 2014. The new lease expires November 30, 2019. Payments associated with the corporate headquarters lease were recorded to rent expense by the Company in the amounts of $259,000$226,000 and $405,000$224,000 for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

The dedicated communications link provides high band width communications to our Velardeña Properties in Mexico. The Company has entered into an agreement with communications services provider that requires monthly payments of $7,000 through October of 2015.

The purchase option agreement is a required payment to a current El Quevar concession owner in order to retain title to the property. The concession is not deemed material to future development at El Quevar and the Company has the right to terminate the payment obligation and release the concession at any time.

 

The Company cannot currently estimate the life of the Velardeña Properties or El Quevar project. ThisThe table above assumes that no annual maintenance payments will be made more than five years after December 31, 2014.2017. If the Company continues mining and processing or evaluations of restart at the Velardeña Properties beyond five years, the Company expects that it would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $12,000$70,000 per year for the life of the Velardeña mine. If the Company continues to evaluate development opportunities at the El Quevar project, the Company expects that it would make annual maintenance payments of approximately $110,000$93,000 per year for the life of the El Quevar mine. The increase in 2015 and subsequent years is the result of a January 2015 amendment to the National Mining Code, increasing the annual canon payment by approximately four times.

 

Payments associated with other exploration concessions the Company owns are not included because the Company has not completed exploration work on these concessions. Exploration success is historically low and the Company has the right to terminate the payments and release the concessions at any time.

Contingencies

The Company has recorded only nil amounts to loss contingencies of approximately $2.6 million and $4.4 million at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively2016, as discussed in Note 12. In addition to the amountsNo loss contingencies were recorded the Company could be liable for up to an additional $0.7 million stemming from a tax auditat December 31, 2017.

F-36


21.Foreign Currency

 

The Company conducts exploration and mining activities primarily in ArgentinaMexico and MexicoArgentina, and gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are related to those activities. The Company’s functional currency is the U.S. dollar but certain transactions are conducted in the local currencies resulting in foreign currency transaction gains or losses.

 

22.Segment22.Segment Information

 

The Company’s sole activity is the mining, construction and exploration of mineral properties containing precious metals.  The Company’s reportable segments are based upon the Company’s revenue producing activities and cash consuming activities. The Company reports two segments, one for its Velardeña Properties in Mexico and the other comprised of non-revenue producing activities including exploration, construction and general and

F-30



GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

administrative activities.  Intercompany revenue and expense amounts have been eliminated within each segment in order to report on the basis that management uses internally for evaluating segment performance. The financial information relating to the Company’s segments is as follows:

 

The Year ended December 31, 2014

 

Revenue

 

Costs
Applicable
to Sales

 

Depreciation,
Depletion and
Amortization

 

Exploration, El
Quevar,
Velardeña and
Administrative
Expense

 

Pre-Tax loss

 

Total Assets

 

Capital
Expenditures

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

Velardeña Properties

 

$

235

 

$

1,655

 

$

2,353

 

$

6,607

 

$

8,144

 

$

27,188

 

$

491

 

Corporate, Exploration & Other

 

 

 

775

 

10,743

 

10,679

 

14,070

 

9

 

 

 

$

235

 

$

1,655

 

$

3,128

 

$

17,350

 

$

18,823

 

$

41,258

 

$

500

 

 

The Year ended December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Properties

 

$

10,680

 

$

17,534

 

$

5,978

 

$

9,426

 

$

278,195

 

$

28,861

 

$

1,767

 

Corporate, Exploration & Other

 

 

 

949

 

12,813

 

11,871

 

26,020

 

30

 

 

 

$

10,680

 

$

17,534

 

$

6,927

 

$

22,239

 

$

290,066

 

$

54,881

 

$

1,797

 

Lesser amounts of revenues, costs applicable to sales, and depreciation were recorded in 2014 as the Velardeña Properties were on care and maintenance much of the year until processing of mined material resumed in early November 2014.  The decline in the Corporate, Exploration and Other segment for total assets from December 31, 2013 to December 31, 2014 is primarily related to a reduction in cash and equivalents.  The Velardeña Properties segment pre-tax loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes charges of $255.7 million related to the impairment of long lived assets and goodwill as discussed in Notes 8 and 9.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

Exploration, El

  

  

 

  

  

 

  

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quevar,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Costs

 

Depreciation,

 

Velardeña and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Applicable

 

Depletion and

 

Administrative

 

Pre-Tax

 

 

 

 

Capital

 

The Year ended December 31, 2017

 

Revenue

 

to Sales

 

Amortization

 

Expense

 

(Income)/Loss

 

Total Assets

 

Expenditures

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Properties

 

$

6,691

 

$

2,189

 

$

584

 

$

2,089

 

$

(3,330)

 

$

6,406

 

$

79

 

Corporate, Exploration & Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

368

 

 

6,925

 

 

7,209

 

 

6,671

 

 

 2

 

 

 

$

6,691

 

$

2,189

 

$

952

 

$

9,014

 

$

3,879

 

$

13,077

 

$

81

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Year ended December 31, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Velardeña Properties

 

$

6,400

 

$

2,046

 

$

1,116

 

$

2,544

 

$

(2,167)

 

$

7,821

 

$

35

 

Corporate, Exploration & Other

 

 

 —

 

 

 —

 

 

432

 

 

7,588

 

 

12,826

 

 

6,187

 

 

15

 

 

 

$

6,400

 

$

2,046

 

$

1,548

 

$

10,132

 

$

10,659

 

$

14,008

 

$

50

 

 

All of the revenue for the two years presented was from the Company’sCompany's Velardeña Properties in Mexico (see Note 16).  The revenue for 2013 and was all attributable to salesthe lease of precipitates and concentrates to five customers under varying agreements. The revenue for 2014 was attributable to sale of concentrates to one customer.the oxide plant. 

 

F-3123.Related Party Transactions

The following sets forth information regarding transactions between the Company (and its subsidiaries) and its officers, directors and significant stockholders. 

Sale of Equipment:

In August 2016, the Company sold certain mining equipment to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of Sentient, for $687,000 (see Note 8), in a transaction approved by the Company’s Audit Committee and Board of Directors. At December 31, 2017 Sentient holds approximately 45% of the Company’s 91.9 million shares of issued and outstanding common stock. The equipment sold was excess equipment held at the Company’s Velardeña Properties that the Company did not expect to use. The Company used a third party consultant with experience in the used mining equipment market in Mexico to determine a fair value. The Company believes the price paid was at least equal to the fair market value of the

F-37


Table of Contents

GOLDEN MINERALS COMPANY

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - (Continued)

(Expressed in United States dollars)

equipment had it been sold through auction or in the open market. The Company received 10% of the sales price at the closing of the sale in August 2016, with the remainder, plus interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, due in February 2017. At December 31, 2016 the Company had recorded a receivable of $643,000 related to the sale, including accrued interest, included in “Related party receivable” in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

With the approval of a Special Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company and Minera Indé amended the original equipment sale on March 31, 2017 to include the sale of an additional piece of excess equipment for $185,000 and extend the time for payment relating to the original equipment sale.  Upon execution of the amendment the Company received an additional payment of $100,000. The remaining principal and interest balance, plus additional interest on the unpaid balance at an annual rate of 10%, was amended to be due in August 2017.  The Company recorded a gain of $105,000 on the sale of the additional equipment, included in “Other operating income” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, equal to the gross proceeds less the remaining basis in the equipment.  On May 2, 2017, the Company received approximately $750,000 from Minera Indé as payment in full for the remaining balance due related to the equipment sale, including interest through that date. At December 31, 2017, no amounts were due to the Company related to the mining equipment sale to Minera Indé.

Administrative Services:

Beginning in August 2016, the Company began providing limited accounting and other administrative services to Minera Indé, an indirect subsidiary of Sentient.  The services are provided locally in Mexico by the administrative staff at the Company’s Velardeña Properties. The Company charges Minera Indé $15,000 per month for the services, which provides reimbursement to the Company for its costs incurred plus a small profit margin. Amounts received under the arrangement reduce costs incurred for the care and maintenance of the Velardeña Properties and allows the Company to maintain a larger more experienced staff at the Velardeña Properties to support the oxide plant lease and potential future mining or processing activities. The Company’s Board of Directors and Audit Committee approved the agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and the period ended December 31, 2016 the Company charged Minera Indé approximately $180,000 and $83,000, respectively for services, offsetting costs that are recorded in “Velardeña shutdown and care and maintenance” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss. 

24.Subsequent Event

In August 2016, the Company, through its wholly owned Mexican subsidiary, entered into an earn-in agreement with a 100% owned Mexican subsidiary of Electrum related to the Company’s Celaya exploration property in Mexico.  (See Note 8 for further details on the terms of the earn-in agreement.)  In February 2018, the Company and Electrum amended the Celaya earn-in agreement to permit Electrum to earn, at its option, an additional 20% interest in the Celaya project in exchange for a $1.0 million payment.  Electrum can now increase its total interest in the project to 80% by contributing 100% of the $2.5 million of expenditures required in the second three-year earn-in period as specified under the earn-in agreement. The Company will recognize a gain of $1.0 million from the amendment in the first quarter 2018.

F-38