Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549


FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT

ANNUAL REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017

000-557862019

000-55786

(Commission file number)

IBM CREDIT LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

22-2351962

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(IRS employer identification number)

Armonk, New YorkOne North Castle Drive

Armonk, New York

10504

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

914-765-1900914-765-1900

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

Limited Liability Company Interests

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes  oNo  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes  oNo  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes  x  No  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes  x No  o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer  o

Accelerated filer  o

Non-accelerated filer  x

Smaller reporting company  o

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Emerging growth company  o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).  Yeso No  x


REDUCED DISCLOSURE FORMAT

IBM Credit LLC (IBM Credit), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of International Business Machines Corporation, meets the requirements set forth in General Instruction I(1) of Form 10-K. In accordance with published guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Division of Corporation Finance, this Annual Report on Form 10-K omits certain disclosure items that correspond to the disclosure items that IBM Credit is permitted to omit from a Form 10-K pursuant to General Instruction I(2) of Form 10-K.




Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Page

PART I

Item 1. Business.

3

Item 1. Business.

3

Item 1A. Risk FactorsFactors..

911

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

1316

Item 2. PropertiesProperties..

1316

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

1316

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

1316

PART II

17

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

1417

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

1417

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

1417

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

4439

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

4640

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

4742

Consolidated Financial Statements

4843

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5249

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

8684

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

8684

Item 9B. Other Information.

8685

PART III

85

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

8785

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

8785

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

8785

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

8785

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

85

PART IV

87

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

8887

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

90

2

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business.

Overview

Overview

IBM Credit LLC (IBM Credit or the company), a Delaware limited liability company, is an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of International Business Machines Corporation (IBM). All of the limited liability company interests in IBM Credit LLC are owned by IBM GF International Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the Member), which is also an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of IBM. IBM Credit is engaged in providing financing solutions for information technology (IT) hardware, software and services.

IBM Credit was originally established as a subsidiary of IBM to provide financing solutions and remanufacturing and remarketing operations, in each case primarily for IBM products sold in the United States. Today, the company maintains a global organizational structure aligned with its operating segments, Client Financing and Commercial Financing. Client Financing primarily provides financing to end-user clients, which consist primarily of large, medium-sized and small corporations and other businesses, for their purchase of IBM products and services and original equipment manufacturers’ (OEM) IT products and services, in each case in order to finance clients’ total solution requirements. Client Financing also provides loans to IBM to finance the acquisition of IT assets used in client services contracts. The company believes the financing arrangements are predominantly for products and services that are critical to the end-user clients’ business operations. Commercial Financing provides working capital financing to suppliers, distributors, and resellers of IBM and OEM IT products and services. Beginning in the second quarter of 2019 and continuing throughout the year, the company wound down the portion of its Commercial Financing operations that provides short-term working capital solutions for OEM IT suppliers, distributors and resellers. The company had receivables of $0.6 billion and $8.5 billion relating to its OEM IT Commercial Financing operations for the periods ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. IBM Credit will continue to provide differentiated end-to-end financing solutions, including commercial financing in support of IBM partner relationships.

For information regarding the company’s operations by segment, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”,Operations,” and note M,N, “Segment Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

IBM Credit has the benefit of both deep knowledge of the company’s and IBM’s client base and insight into the hardware, software and services traditionally financed. These factors allow the company to effectively manage two of the major risks associated with financing: credit and residual value. These risks and others are discussed more fully in Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” The company also maintains long-term relationships with its clients through various stages of the IT asset life cycle — including initial purchase, technology upgrades and end-of-lease asset disposition.

Organizational Structure

IBM Credit was incorporated in Delaware in 1981 as IBM Credit Corporation and was subsequently converted to a limited liability company and renamed IBM Credit LLC in 2003.

IBM Credit operates as part of IBM’s Global Financing (IGF) business segment. The IGF business segment encompasses two primary activities: IBM Credit’s financing business and IBM’s remanufacturing and remarketing business. The remanufacturing and remarketing business includes sales, marketing and inventory management of used IBM and OEM IT products, and is conducted by IBM subsidiaries that are not part of IBM Credit.

In 2016, IGF established new entities to separate certain assets and liabilities related to IBM Credit’s financing business from IBM in the majority of countries where IGF operates. In most countries in which IBM Credit’s financing business was operated as a division of the IBM legal entity, a subsidiary was formed that acquired the assets and liabilities related to the financing business from the existing IBM legal entity. The remanufacturing and remarketing business and related assets and liabilities remained in the existing IBM legal entity. In the few countries where the financing business was not considered material to IBM Credit on a consolidated basis, such operations remained in the existing IBM legal entity.

3

Table of Contents

Item 1. Business – (continued)

These countries’ operating results are not reported as part of IBM Credit. In countries in which the financing business already operated in a separate legal entity and included the remanufacturing and remarketing business, such legal entity was transferred to IBM Credit. In connection with each such transfer, the legal entity divested its assets and liabilities related to the remanufacturing and remarketing business to IBM prior to its transfer to IBM Credit. In 2017, IBM Credit directly or indirectly acquired all of the foreign legal entities that operate the financing business, as referenced above. This is intendedabove, as part of a strategy to drive operational benefits by consolidating the financing business under IBM Credit.

The company divested its remanufacturing and remarketing business in the U.S. to IBM in 2016 to leverage IBM’s experience in product manufacturing, distribution, sales and service of IT equipment. The company concluded that the divestiture of the U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business represented a significant strategic shift in the company’s operations which will have a material effect on its future financial results. As a result, the U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business results are presented as discontinued operations for the historical periods included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The foreign remanufacturing and remarketing business was divested by the foreign affiliates prior to

Item 1. Business – (continued)

the company acquiring the foreign affiliates, and is therefore not included in the company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Business Segments

The company’s two operating segments, Client Financing and Commercial Financing, are business units that offer financing solutions based upon the needs of the company’s clients. The segments represent components of the company for which separate financial information is available and utilized on a regular basis by the chief operating decision maker in determining how to allocate resources and evaluate performance.

Each segment’s business and the financing solutions that generate the segment’s revenue, results of operations and asset portfolio are discussed further in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in note M,N, “Segment Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Client Financing

The company provides leases and loan financing to end-user clients and acquires installment payment plans offered to end-user clients by IBM. End-user clients are primarily IBM clients who elect to finance their acquisition of IBM’s hardware, software, and services, as well as OEM IT hardware, software and services, to meet their total solution requirements. In addition, the company provides loans to IBM, primarily in support of IBM’s Global Technology Services & Cloud Platforms segment’s acquisition of IT assets, which are used in its external, revenue-producing services contracts.

Client Financing solutions are typically delivered as follows:

·Leases, Loans and Installment Payment Plans: Leases are primarily direct financing and operating leases for IBM’s hardware and select OEM IT hardware in areas in which IBM and the company have experience. Loans are primarily made to end-user clients to finance purchases of IBM and select OEM software and services, and are generally unsecured. These leases and loans are typically documented in contracts between IBM Credit and the end-user client.

Leases, Loans and Installment Payment Plans: Leases are primarily sales-type, direct financing and operating leases for IBM’s hardware and select OEM IT hardware in areas in which IBM and the company have experience. Loans are primarily made to end-user clients to finance purchases of IBM and select OEM software and services, and are generally unsecured. These leases and loans are typically documented in contracts between IBM Credit and the end-user client.

In certain countries, the leases and loans are originated by IBM directly to the end-user client, and the company purchases the receivables and related equipment from IBM. In addition, IBM Credit supports IBM’s client offerings of installment payment plans for hardware, software and services to the end-user by purchasing receivables related to such payment plans from IBM. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

·IBM Total Solution Offerings that include Financing: For certain IBM offerings, IBM Credit’s financing contract is bundled with IBM’s product and service contract to create a combined periodic payment schedule for the entire offering (Total Solution Offering). For Total Solution Offerings, the financing and non-financing amounts are provided in a single, combined periodic invoice for the IBM end-user client, such that each amount due to IBM Credit for the financing payment is collected by IBM along with the amounts due to IBM for the non-financing items. In these cases, IBM acts as IBM Credit’s billing and collection agent and forwards the financing payments to IBM Credit.

IBM Total Solution Offerings that include Financing: For certain IBM offerings, IBM Credit’s financing contract is bundled with IBM’s product and service contract to create a combined periodic payment schedule for the entire offering (Total Solution Offering). For Total Solution Offerings, the financing and non-financing amounts due are provided in a single, combined periodic invoice for the IBM end-user client, such that each amount due to IBM Credit for the financing payment is collected by IBM along with the amounts due to IBM for the non-financing items. In these cases, IBM acts as IBM Credit’s billing and collection agent and forwards the financing payments to IBM Credit.

For IBM Total Solution Offerings in certain countries, as well as for certain government and other contracts, IBM Credit is not a party to IBM’s contract with the end-user client. Instead, IBM directly provides the end-user client with the financing. IBM Credit acquires a participation interest from IBM that represents the financing portion of such payments and assumes the associated credit risk of IBM’s end-user client from IBM. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

Table of Contents

·Other Financing to IBM: In certain countries, the company provides loans to IBM, primarily in support of IBM’s Technology Services & Cloud Platforms segment’s acquisition of IT assets which are used in its external, revenue-producing services contracts. The loan portfolio balance is renewed and repriced periodically with a net settlement for advances on new equipment acquisitions or repayments of principal on prior acquisitions.Item 1. Business – (continued)

Other Financing to IBM: In certain countries, the company provides loans to IBM, primarily in support of IBM’s Global Technology Services segment’s acquisition of IT assets used in its external, revenue-producing client services contracts. The loan portfolio balance is renewed and repriced periodically with a net settlement for advances on new equipment acquisitions or repayments of principal on prior acquisitions. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Client Financing solutions are typically marketed and sold by IBM Credit employees, primarily in cooperation with IBM and business partner sales teams during the product and services sales cycle. Client Financing solutions are generally offered at

Item 1. Business – (continued)

market rates that are competitive with what individual clients could obtain from other lenders. Client Financing solutions may also be offered at discounted rates, resulting from financing incentives provided by IBM, business partners or OEM IT providers through various financing incentive programs, allowing IBM Credit to realize a market yield. For additional information, see the “Financing Incentive Programs” section.

The company recovers the residual value of leased equipment by selling to IBM assets that have been returned from lease at cost, which approximates fair value. In addition, IBM may migrate a client to new technology. In the event this migration results in an early termination of a lease, IBM will purchase the returned equipment from the company at a pre-negotiated price, which is a function of the discounted value of the scheduled future lease payments and the residual value. The company may also obtain guarantees from financial institutions of the future value of the equipment to be returned at the end of lease. Guarantees may be obtained for both IBM and OEM IT products. For additional information on the residual value of leased assets and the sale of equipment returned from lease to IBM, see note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” and note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Commercial Financing

IBM Credit provides working capital financing to suppliers (consisting of IBM and suppliers of OEM IT products and services), distributors (typically third parties that purchase IT products from suppliers and provide those products to resellers) and resellers. This financing may take the form of loans to distributors and resellers, which are generally unsecured obligations of the client, but may be collateralized by inventory or accounts receivable. This financing may also include factoring, in which IBM Credit purchases receivables from suppliers, distributors or resellers.

IBM Credit generally extends payment terms in the range of 30 to 90 days to distributors and resellers in respect of their inventory purchases, while providing early settlement to suppliers at the supplier’s election. Suppliers generally provide financing incentives to reduce their distributors’ or resellers’ cost of financing for this term. The extended payment terms and early settlement provide liquidity to these clients. Commercial Financing is also important to suppliers and distributors because it enables them to shed credit risk, which is assumed by IBM Credit. For certain creditworthy distributors or resellers, IBM Credit may, at its discretion, allow a further extension of the repayment period for an additional financing charge. In addition, IBM Credit purchases interests in certain of IBM’s trade and other accounts receivable at a discount and assumes the credit risk of the IBM client. In the second quarter of 2019, the company suspended the program under which IBM Credit purchases interests in IBM’s trade accounts receivable.

Beginning in the second quarter of 2019 and continuing throughout the year, the company wound down the OEM IT portion of its Commercial Financing operations. The company will continue to provide differentiated end-to-end financing solutions, including commercial financing in support of IBM partner relationships.

Financial Regulation and Supervision

IBM Credit’s operations are subject to financial regulation, including licensing requirements and supervision, within and outside the U.S., including licensing requirements and supervision. Although IBM Credit operates in all 50 states and in certain U.S. territories, the company is only required to be licensed for the type of financing it provides in a very limited number of states or territories. The company believes it is in material compliance with all licensing requirements in these states and territories. None of the company’s lender licenses are consumer finance licenses, as the company does not extend credit to consumers. In certain of these jurisdictions, as a result of being licensed as a non-bank lender, the company is or may be subject to compliance examinations, audits or information requests, including with respect to client complaints, by the relevant licensing

5

Table of Contents

Item 1. Business – (continued)

agency. With respect to the type of commercial financing activities conducted by IBM Credit, state and local laws in the U.S. generally regulate debt collection practices and creditors’ rights, establish maximum interest rates and other charges and prohibit discrimination in the extension of credit and related activities.

In addition to state and local laws, IBM Credit is subject to certain federal financial laws and regulations, including, for example, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act which, among other things, prohibits discrimination in the extension of credit and related activities.

IBM Credit’s financing business outside the U.S. is generally conducted through subsidiaries and is subject to local financial laws and regulations, including, in certain jurisdictions, reporting requirements and the requirement to maintain an anti-money laundering program. A limited number of IBM Credit’s foreign subsidiaries are authorized or licensed as banks, credit institutions or non-bank lenders that are subject to heightened regulation, including, for example, capital requirements and prudential supervision by local authorities. The company’s regulated subsidiaries in these countries are subject to periodic examinations related to their financing business.

IBM Credit monitors its financing operations for compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The company believes it is in material compliance with all licensing requirements as are necessary to conduct its financing business both within and outside the United States and is in material compliance with all laws and regulations applicable to its financing operations.

Item 1. Business – (continued)

Portfolio Risk Management

IBM Credit conducts a credit evaluation of its clients prior to extending financing. The credit evaluation takes into account current information about the client, such as published credit ratings, financial statements, news reports and current market implied credit analysis, as well as the current economic environment, outstanding obligations to the company and prior collection history. In some cases, commercial factors, including IBM’s relationship with a client, are also considered in making origination and other business decisions. Counterparty risks are managed at an overall IBM level and all subsidiaries, including IBM Credit, operate within those policies, principles and delegations. When appropriate, actions are taken to mitigate credit risk, such as requiring the inclusion of covenants from the client to protect against credit deterioration during the life of the obligation and obtaining credit enhancements, such as payment guarantees and letters of credit. The company performs additional credit evaluations of its clients on a regular basis. For additional information, see note E,F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

IBM Credit employs a rigorous process to optimize portfolio risk and to obtain additional credit capacity in support of new business opportunities. IBM Credit engages in portfolio risk mitigation by entering into various non-recourse and limited recourse agreements with third parties consisting primarily of domestic and foreign financial institutions including banks, commercial and vendor finance companies, equipment lessors, credit insurers and other specialty finance companies. Third party arrangements may be funded or unfunded and include participations, sales and assignments, factoring, credit insurance, and other credit risk mitigation structures under discretionary or committed facilities. In limited instances, the company sells financing receivables and operating leases (and related assets) to third parties.

Financing Incentive Programs

IBM and OEM IT suppliers from time to time sponsor financing incentive programs that allow the company to offer waived or reduced rate financing for marketing program offerings and sales promotions. Pursuant to these programs, IBM or OEM IT suppliers offer a discount to IBM Credit that enables the company to realize a market yield on any financing contractClient Financing agreements entered into either directly or indirectly under these incentive programs. Market yield is based on the credit quality of the client and the length of the contract.

The volume of financing incentive programs sponsored by IBM and others,OEM IT suppliers, and the split of those programs between leases and loans, may vary over time depending upon the marketing strategies of the respective supplier.

6

Table of Contents

Item 1. Business – (continued)

In addition, the company provides financing which includes an interest free period to suppliers, distributors and resellers of IBM products and services, which is funded by IBM. These fees are included in the Commercial Financing segment as financing revenue. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Client Services

Once a financing arrangement is in place, the company provides its clients with timely direct settlement of financial obligations with such clients’ suppliers. The company provides account management and client service and support throughout the financing relationship. This includesrelationship, including reminders for payment, processing of payments and handling of client billing questions. The company also provides end-of-lease options, including purchase, extension or return of leased equipment.

Relationship with IBM

IBM Credit is a captive finance company and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of IBM. IBM Credit generally conducts its financing activities with IBM on an arm’s-length basis, subject in certain cases, particularly with respect to originations, to commercial factors, including IBM’s relationship with a client. The following is a description of certain material relationships between IBM and IBM Credit regarding support, borrowing, licensing, service and other arrangements. For additional information, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

IBM Support Agreement

IBM Credit and IBM are parties to a support agreement, which became effective on May 2, 2017 (the Support(Support Agreement). Pursuant to the Support Agreement, IBM has agreed with IBM Credit that IBM will:

·                  retain, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of at least 51 percent of the equity voting interests in IBM Credit at all times;

·                  cause IBM Credit to, on the last day of each of IBM Credit’s fiscal years, have a consolidated tangible net worth of at least $50 million (with consolidated tangible net worth for purposes of this discussion of the Support Agreement

Item 1. Business – (continued)

understood to mean (a) the total assets of IBM Credit and its subsidiary companies less (b) the intangible assets and total liabilities of IBM Credit and its subsidiary companies); and

·                  cause the leverage ratio of IBM Credit to be no more than 11 to 1 for each of IBM Credit’s fiscal quarters (with leverage ratio for purposes of this discussion of the Support Agreement understood to mean, for any calendar quarter, IBM Credit’s debt-to-equity ratio as reported in, and calculated in the manner set forth in, IBM Credit’s periodic report covering such fiscal quarter).

retain, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of at least 51 percent of the equity voting interests in IBM Credit at all times;
cause IBM Credit to, on the last day of each of IBM Credit’s fiscal years, have a consolidated tangible net worth of at least $50 million (with consolidated tangible net worth for purposes of this discussion of the Support Agreement understood to mean (a) the total assets of IBM Credit and its subsidiary companies less (b) the intangible assets and total liabilities of IBM Credit and its subsidiary companies); and
cause the leverage ratio of IBM Credit to be no more than 11 to 1 for each of IBM Credit’s fiscal quarters (with leverage ratio for purposes of this discussion of the Support Agreement understood to mean, for any calendar quarter, IBM Credit’s debt-to-equity ratio as reported in, and calculated in the manner set forth in, IBM Credit’s periodic report covering such fiscal quarter).

In the event that IBM Credit’s leverage ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter is higher than 11 to 1, then, upon demand by IBM Credit, IBM has agreed to make or cause to be made a capital contribution to IBM Credit in an amount sufficient to cause the leverage ratio to not exceed 11 to 1.

The Support Agreement is not a guarantee by IBM of any indebtedness, other obligation, or liability of any kind of IBM Credit.

IBM or IBM Credit may each terminate the Support Agreement upon giving the other party 30 days prior written notice, with a copy of such notice to each rating agency that is then rating any outstanding debt (with debt for purposes of this discussion defined as IBM Credit’s indebtedness for borrowed money that either (i) is rated by one or more rating agencies or (ii) is designated by the board of managers of IBM Credit as constituting debt for purposes of the Support Agreement). The Support Agreement may be modified or amended only by the written agreement of IBM and IBM

7

Table of Contents

Item 1. Business – (continued)

Credit and upon 30 days prior written notice to each rating agency rating any outstanding debt. However, such termination, modification or amendment will not be effective with respect to any debt outstanding at the time of such termination, modification or amendment unless (a) such termination, modification or amendment is permitted under the documentation governing such debt, (b) all affected holders of such debt (or, in the case of debt incurred pursuant to documentation that permits the Support Agreement to be terminated, modified, or amended with the consent of less than all of the holders of such debt, the requisite holders of such debt) otherwise consent in writing or (c) with respect to debt that is rated by one or more rating agencies at the request of IBM or IBM Credit, each such rating agency confirms in writing that the rating assigned to such debt by such rating agency will not be withdrawn or reduced because of the proposed action.

Under the terms of the Support Agreement, the Support Agreement is not enforceable against IBM by anyone other than (a) IBM Credit or (b) if any case is commenced under the United States Bankruptcy Code (11(11 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq.), or any successor statutory provisions (the Bankruptcy Code), in respect of IBM Credit, the debtor in possession or trustee appointed by the court having jurisdiction over such proceeding. In the event of (1) a breach by IBM in performing a provision of the Support Agreement and (2) the commencement of such a case under the Bankruptcy Code with respect to IBM Credit while any debt is outstanding, the remedies of a holder of debt shall include the right, if no proceeding on behalf of IBM Credit has already been commenced in such case, to file a petition in respect of IBM Credit thereunder with a view to the debtor in possession, or the trustee appointed by the court having jurisdiction over such proceeding, pursuing IBM Credit’s rights under the Support Agreement.

The Support Agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

Borrowing Relationship

The company has a credit facilityfacilities with IBM that allowsallow the company to obtain short-termshort- and long-term funding on an as neededas-needed basis and the company seeks to substantially match fundmatch-fund the term, currency and interest rate variability of its debt against its underlying financing assets. The general terms of the loans under these credit facilities are set forth in a customarystandard intercompany loan agreement,agreements, which includesinclude standard default clauses (including failure to pay interest or principal when due, bankruptcy and ceasing to be a wholly owned subsidiary). The specific terms of any individual loan, including the interest rate and term applicable to each loan, are set forth in a loan confirmation statement that is issued at the time of each individual borrowing under the facility. IBM Credit is entitled to prepay loans issued under thisthese credit facilityfacilities from time to time, subject to payment of any agreed penalty or premium. Loans with IBM under such agreements are included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as debt payable to IBM. Interest expense incurred on these borrowings from IBM is included in financing cost in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. For additional information on short-termshort- and long-term funding, see note G,H, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Services and Other Arrangements

The company sources a number of services from IBM, including functional support for collection administration, treasury, accounting, legal, tax, human resources, marketing and IT services. In certain instances, IBM acts as IBM Credit’s billing and collection agent and forwards the financing payments to IBM Credit. The company also has the right to use certain IBM intangibles in its business. Where practical, allocationscharges of the expenses incurred by IBM in the provision of these functional

Item 1. Business – (continued)

support services are based upon direct usage. For the remainder, where possible, expenses are allocatedcharged based on measurable non-financial drivers, such as number of employees. When a clear and measurable non-financial driver cannot be established, these expenses are allocatedcharged based on a measurable financial driver, such as net margin. Management believes that these allocation methods are reasonable. In addition, the company conducts its global operations primarily from IBM leased or IBM owned facilities for which IBM charges the company for occupancy expenses based on square footage space usage with no fixed term commitment. For additional information regarding the historical allocation of expenses by IBM to the company, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The company participates in the various IBM stock-based compensation plans, including awards of Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

8

Table of Contents

Item 1. Business – (continued)

The company participates in certain multiemployer retirement-related plans that are sponsored by IBM. Charges from IBM to the company in relation to these multiemployer plans (including non-pension, post-retirement benefits) are limited to service costs. The company is charged by IBM using an allocation method based on the number of employees. Contributions and any other typetypes of costs for these multiemployer plans are the responsibility of IBM. In certain countries, the company participates in plans that are accounted for as multiple-employer plans. For these plans, the retirement-related plan obligation is owned by the company and is generally calculated using actuarial valuations. These plans are accounted for as multiple-employer plans. Under these plans, IBM manages the assets and allocates them to the company based on the company’s obligation. The company also participates in certain defined contribution plans and is charged by IBM based on the number of employees. For additional information, see note L,M, “Retirement-Related Benefits,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Expenses related to the services discussed above are included in Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expense in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. It is not practical to estimate the actual costs that would have been incurred had IBM Credit been a separate company during the periods presented. These costs also may not be indicative of the expenses that IBM Credit will incur in the future or would have incurred if the company had obtained these services from a third party.

The company also invests a portion of its excess cash in short-term interest bearinginterest-bearing accounts with IBM, which can be withdrawn upon demand. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Tax Sharing Agreement

The company’s U.S. federal and certain state and foreign operations are included in various IBM consolidated tax returns; and in such cases, IBM makes payments to tax authorities on the company’s behalf. IBM and the company maintain a Tax Sharing Agreementtax sharing agreement for any operations included in an IBM consolidated tax return pursuant(Tax Sharing Agreement). Pursuant to whichthe Tax Sharing Agreement, IBM charges the company for any taxes owed and reimburses the company for tax attributes generated. Such charges or reimbursements are based upon a calculation of the company’s relevant pro forma stand-alone tax return. For additional information, see note K,L, “Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Competition

The company operates in a highly competitive environment, where financing for users of IBM hardware, software and services and OEM IT products and services is available through a variety of sources. The company’s strong relationship with IBM provides the company with access to capital and the ability to manage increased exposures, each of which generates a competitive advantage. The key competitive factors in Client Financing and Commercial Financing include interest rates charged, IT product experience, client service, contract flexibility, ease of doing business, global capabilities and residual values. In providing financing solutions to clients, the company competes with three types of companies: other captive financing entities of IT companies, non-captive financing entities and banks and financial institutions.

Employees and Related Workforce

At December 31, 2019, IBM Credit and its subsidiaries employed approximately 2,200 people globally.

Geographic Results

The company reports revenue on a geographic basis within Item 7, “Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” The geographies include the Americas, Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA), and Asia Pacific. The company also provides information regarding total revenue and earning assets in the U.S. and foreign countries in note M,N, “Segment Information,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

9

Table of Contents

Item 1. Business – (continued)

Available Information

IBM Credit files reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), including the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any other filings required by the SEC. The SEC maintains a website (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. In addition, IBM’s website (www.ibm.com/investor) contains a significant amount of information about IBM Credit, including the company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. These materials are also available free of charge on or through IBM’s website.

Forward-looking and Cautionary Statements

Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“Reform Act”)(Reform Act). Forward-looking statements are based on the company’s current assumptions regarding future business and financial performance. These statements by their nature address matters that are uncertain to different degrees. The company may also make forward-looking statements in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC and in materials delivered to lenders and in press releases. In addition, the company’s and IBM representatives may from time to time make oral forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements provide current expectations of future events based on certain assumptions and include any statement that does not directly relate to any historical or current fact. Words such as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” “estimates,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects” and similar expressions, may identify such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement in this Form 10-K speaks only as of the date on which it is made.made, except as required by law. The company assumes no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. In accordance with the Reform Act, set forth under Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K are cautionary statements that accompany those forward-looking statements. Readers should carefully review such cautionary statements as they identify certain important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements and from historical trends. Those cautionary statements are not exclusive and are in addition to other factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K, in the company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC or in materials incorporated therein by reference.

10

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

The Company’s Financial Condition is in Large Part Dependent upon IBM:A significant portion of IBM Credit’s financing business consists of financing associated with the sale of IBM’s products and services. Financing originations, which determine the company’s financing asset base, are impacted by IBM’s product and services sales volumes and IBM Credit’s participation rates in those sales. Participation rates reflect the propensity of IBM’s clients to finance their transactions through IBM Credit in lieu of paying IBM up-front cash or financing through a third party. As discussed aboveon page 6 under “Financing Incentive Programs,” IBM Credit participates in certain marketing programs in conjunction with IBM that allow the company to offer financing to end-user clients, which provides IBM Credit with a competitive advantage in financing IBM’s offerings. Any change in these marketing programs or IBM’s distribution methods, or any reduction in the company’s ability to offer competitively priced financing to IBM end-user clients, could reduce the company’s participation rates in IBM’s product and service offerings, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company. IBM also provides IBM Credit with other types of operational and administrative support, which are integral to the conduct of the company’s business. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Any changes in the levels of support from IBM could also negatively impact the company’s results. Further, if there were significant changes in IBM’s liquidity or capital position, the quality of IBM’s offerings, transfers of ownership of IBM’s products or services, or other factors impacting IBM or its products, such changes could significantly affect IBM Credit’s financial condition and results of operations. In addition, IBM has one of the strongest brand names in the world, and its brand and overall reputation could be negatively impacted by many factors, including if IBM does not continue to be recognized for its industry-leading technology and solutions.solutions and as a cognitive leader. If negative perceptions tarnish IBM’s or IBM Credit’s brand image and reputation, IBM Credit’s ability to attract and retain clientscustomers and talent could be impacted. The success of IBM’s business and operations and demand for IBM products and services are subject to a number of risks, including, among others:

IBM’s ability to reach its growth and productivity objectives under its long-term business strategy;
IBM’s ability to continue its cutting-edge innovation and ability to commercialize such innovations;
Risks from IBM’s investments in key strategic areas to drive revenue growth and market share;
IBM’s relationship with its critical suppliers;
Quality issues with IBM products;
IBM’s reliance on third party distribution channels and ecosystems; and
Risks from IBM’s acquisitions, alliances and dispositions, including integration challenges.

·                  IBM’s ability to reach its growth and productivity objectives under its long-term business strategy;

·                  IBM’s ability to continue its cutting-edge innovation and ability to commercialize such innovations;

·                  Risks from IBM’s investments in strategic growth imperatives to drive revenue growth and market share;

·                  IBM’s relationship with its critical suppliers;

·                  Quality issues with IBM products;

·                  IBM’s reliance on third party distribution channels and ecosystems; and

·                  Risks from IBM’s acquisitions, alliances and dispositions, including integration challenges.

Item 1A. Risk Factors – (continued)

Additionally, the company’s credit ratings depend, in part, on the existence of the Support Agreement with IBM. If this arrangement, or replacement arrangements, if any, are modified, or if a credit rating of IBM is lowered, the company’s credit ratings could be negatively impacted, potentially leading to higher borrowing costs and negatively impacting the company’s ability to offer competitively priced financing to its clients, which could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company.

Downturn in Economic Environment Could Impact the Company’s Business: If there is a downturn in the economic environment, generally or specific to certain industries in which IBM Credit’s clients operate, clients may be unable to meet their debt obligations and they may not enter into new financing arrangements, which could negatively impact the company’s financial results.

Technology Sector Innovation Initiatives Could Impact Client’sClients’ Propensity to Enter into Financing Arrangements: As IBM and other suppliers of technology transform their offerings and enter new market segments, some new offerings and delivery models may be less conducive to traditional financing than the historical offerings. While the company makes efforts to adapt IBM Credit’s financing business and offerings to these changes, the company may not be successful and this could have negative impacts on the company’s financial results and long-term success.

The Company’s Reliance on Partner Relationships Could Impact itsIts Business: The company offers its solutions directly and through a variety of business partners, including suppliers, distributors and resellers of IT hardware, software and

11

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors – (continued)

services. Changes in the business condition, financial or otherwise, of these parties could negatively impact the company and affect its ability to bring its solutions to market. If the company moves into new areas, partners may be unable to keep up with changes in IBM Credit’s offerings, and the company may be unable to recruit and enable appropriate partners. In addition, the failure of partners to comply with all applicable laws and regulations may prevent the company from working with them, which could negatively impact the company and affect its ability to bring solutions to market.

The Company’s Financial Performance Could be Impacted by itsIts Ability to Collect Receivables in a Timely Manner and Result in SustainingIncurring Potential Unexpected Credit Losses:Changes in the concentration of credit and the credit risk of IBM Credit’s clients can be impacted by global, country, industry and client specific economic conditions, which in turn may impact the clients’ working capital and their ability to make scheduled payments on the company’s financing receivables. In addition, client allegations and disputes regarding product quality, service delivery, concerns, amounts due to the company under Total Solution Offerings or other circumstances, unique to the clients, may cause themclients to delay scheduled payments when due. IBM Credit’s ability to collect receivables and generate sufficient cash to meet its business obligations, including servicing its debt, can have a significant impact on the company’s business operations.

Additionally, the company’s client base includes a variety of enterprises, from small and medium businesses to the world’s largest organizations and governmental entities. The company performs ongoingregular credit evaluations of its clients’ financial conditions. These credit evaluations rely in part on third party information, including information provided by the company’s clients, and may not successfully predict client financial conditions and detect and prevent fraud or misconduct by the company’s end-user clients or other third parties. Any such fraud or misconduct could have a significant impact on the company’s ability to collect receivables. If the company becomes aware of information related to the creditworthiness of a client, or if actual default rates on receivables in the future differ from those currently anticipated, the company may have to adjust its allowance for credit losses, which could affect the company’s financial position and results of operations.

Changes to Residual Value Could Adversely Affect the Profitability of the Company’s Lease Transactions:The recorded residual values of lease assets are estimated at the inception of thea lease to be the expected fair value of the assets at the end of the lease term. The estimated residual value of leased equipment is based on a number of factors, including historical market sales prices, past remarketing experience, any known significant market or product trends and IBM’s remarketing plans. If residual values significantly decline or if residual values are incorrectly estimated, in each case due to economic factors, product quality issues, market or client behavior changes, fraud or misconduct by end-user clients or other third parties, unforeseen technology innovations or any other circumstances, it may lower financing margin and income or result in losses.

The Company’s Financial Performance Could be Impacted by Exposure to Currency and Financing Risks and Changes in Market Liquidity Conditions:The company derives a significant percentage of its revenues and costs from its operations in local currency environments, which are affected by changes in the relative values of the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies. Further, inherent in the company’s business are risks related to the interest rate and currency fluctuations on the associated debt and liabilities. Changes in interest rates or changes in the global economy (including currency fluctuations) could have a negative impact on both revenue and net margin. Although the company seeks to substantially match fundmatch-fund the term, currency and interest rate variability of its debt against its underlying financing assets, risks may arise from a mismatch between assets

Item 1A. Risk Factors – (continued)

and the related liabilities used for funding. The company employs several strategies to manage these risks, including the use of derivative financial instruments. However, there can be no assurance that the company’s efforts to manage its currency and financing risks will be successful. The company’s financial performance is exposed to a wide variety of industry sector dynamics worldwide that could impact IBM Credit’s ability to generate sufficient cash to service its debt. The company’s earnings and cash flows, as well as its access to funding, could be negatively impacted by changes in market liquidity conditions. For more information about the company’s liquidity position, see Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in this Form 10-K.

IBM Credit’s ability to make payments on, or to refinance, its indebtedness and to fund the company’s operations depends on its ability to generate cash and its ability to access the capital markets. These factors, to a certain extent, are

12

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors – (continued)

subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, capital market and other conditions that are beyond the company’s control. The availability and cost of financing is also influenced by the company’s credit ratings, which depend in part on the existence of the Support Agreement with IBM. If IBM Credit is unable to generate sufficient cash flows in the future to service its debt, the company may be required to refinance all or a portion of its existing debt or to obtain additional financing. There can be no assurance that any refinancing will be available or that additional financing could be obtained on acceptable terms. In the absence of other funding alternatives, a protracted period where the company could not access the capital markets would likely lead to a slowdown in originations. The inability to service or refinance the company’s existing debt, which has a dependency on IBM, or to obtain additional financing could have a material adverse effect on the financial position, liquidity, and results of operations of the company.

Certain of the Company’s Operations Are Subject to Financial Regulation, Supervision and Licensing under Various Laws and RegulationsRegulations:: The company is required to comply with a range of financial laws and regulations within and outside the U.S., which may be costly to adhere to and may affect both the results of its operations and its ability to service its earning assets. Compliance with these laws and regulations requires that the company maintain certain licenses and be subject to examinations or audits by supervisory authorities in certain jurisdictions in which it operates. Failure to comply with such laws and regulations in any particular jurisdiction could result in significant civil penalties and other sanctions, such as a revocation of the company’s license to do business in that jurisdiction. In the event the company were to become subject to any such sanctions, its business in the affected jurisdiction could be adversely affected, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on IBM Credit’s business prospects, results of operations or financial condition.

Due to the Company’s Global Presence, itsIts Business and Operations Could be impactedBe Impacted by Local Legal, Economic, Political, Health and HealthOther Conditions: The company is a global business, so changes in the laws or policies of the countries in which the company operates, or inadequate development or enforcement of laws or policies, could affect the company’s business and overall results of operations. Substantial revisions that U.S. and foreign governments are undertaking or considering in areas such as the regulation and supervision of financial institutions, including financing and leasing companies, may have an effect on the company’s structure, operations, sales, liquidity, capital requirements, effective tax rate and performance. The company’s results of operations could also be affected by economic and political changes around the world and by macroeconomic changes, including recessions, inflation, currency fluctuations between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies and adverse changes in trade relationships between countries. Further, asif the company expands its client base and the scope of its offerings, both within the U.S. and globally, the company may be impacted by additional regulatory or other risks, including compliance with U.S. and foreign financial industry laws and regulations, data privacy requirements, enforcement of intellectual property protection, anti-money laundering laws, tax laws, anti-competition regulations, anti-corruption laws, and import, export and trade restrictionsrestrictions. Further, uncertainty has been created by international trade disputes. Tariffs and export requirements.sanctions resulting from these disputes could affect IBM’s ability to move goods and services across borders, or could impose added costs to those activities, which could impact the company’s operations. Measures taken to date by IBM and the company to mitigate these impacts could be made less effective should trade sanctions or tariffs change. In addition, any widespread outbreak of an illness, pandemic or other local or global health issue, natural disasters, climate change impacts, or uncertain political climates, international hostilities, natural disasters, or any terrorist activities, could negatively affect clientcustomer demand and the company’s operations.

For example, the U.K. referendum to exit from the E.U., commonly referred to as “Brexit”, has caused global economic, trade and regulatory uncertainty. The company is actively monitoring and planning for Brexit.

Cybersecurity and Privacy Considerations Could Impact the Company’s Business:In the current environment, there There are numerous and evolving risks to cybersecurity and privacy, including risks originating from intentional acts of criminal hackers, hacktivists, state-sponsored intrusions, industrial espionage, employee malfeasancenation states, and humancompetitors; from intentional and unintentional acts of customers, contractors, business partners, vendors, employees and other third parties; and from errors in processes or technological error.technologies. Computer hackers and others routinely attempt to breachattack the security of our technology systems and networks, and to fraudulently induce customers, contractors, business partners, vendors, employees, clients and othersother third parties to disclose information, transfer funds, or unwittingly provide access to systems or data. The company is at risk of such attacks to the company includes attemptedsecurity breaches not only of its own systems and networks, but also those of its clients, contractors, business partners, vendors, employees and other third parties.

13

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors – (continued)

Cyber threats are continually evolving, making it difficult to detect and defend against certain threats and vulnerabilities that can persist over extended periods of time. The systems utilized by the company involve the storage, processing and transmission of sensitive data, including proprietary or confidential data, regulated data, and personal information of employees, clients and others. Successful breaches, employee malfeasance,cybersecurity attacks or human or technological errorother security incidents could result in, for example, one or more of the following: unauthorized access to, disclosure, modification, misuse, loss, or destruction of company, client, or other third party data or systems;systems; theft or import or export of sensitive, regulated, or confidential data including personal information and intellectual property;property; the loss of access to critical data or systems through ransomware, crypto mining, destructive attacks or other means;means; and business delays, service or system disruptions or denial of service. In the event of such actions, the company, its clients, and other third parties could be exposed to potential

Item 1A. Risk Factors – (continued)

liability, litigation, and regulatory or other government action, as well as the loss of existing or potential clients, damage to brand and reputation, and other financial loss. In addition, the cost and operational consequences of responding to breachescybersecurity incidents and implementing remediation measures could be significant.

The global regulatory environment with regard to cybersecurity, privacy and data protection issues including the General Data Protection Regulation coming into force in the European Union in May 2018, is increasingly challengingcomplex and may have impacts onwill continue to impact the company’s business, including through increased risk, increased costs and expanded or otherwise altered compliance obligations. IBM Credit hasThe enactment and expansion of data protection and privacy laws and regulations around the abilityglobe, the lack of harmonization of such laws and regulations, and the potential regulation of new and emerging technologies will continue to leverage IBM’s leading security technologiesresult in increased compliance costs and solutions, as well as regulatory compliance practices, but as the cybersecurity and corresponding regulatory landscape evolves, the company could incur additional cost, or may also find it necessary to make further significant investments in the future to protect data and infrastructure. Cybersecurity risk to the company and its clients will also depend on factors, such as actions, practices and investments of clients, contractors, business partners, vendors and other third parties.

risks.

The Company isIs Subject to Legal Proceedings and Investigatory Risks: As a global company with business operations, employees and clients in many countries, the company is or may bebecome involved either as a plaintiff party and/or defendant or other party, inmay be subject to a variety of ongoing claims, demands, suits, investigations, tax matters and other proceedings that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of its business. The company believes that it has adopted appropriate risk management and compliance programs. Legal and compliance risks, however, will continue to exist and additional legal proceedings and other contingencies, the outcome of which cannot be predicted with certainty, may arise from time to time. Additional information on legal matters is included in note J,K, “Contingencies and Commitments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Tax Matters could impactCould Impact the Company’s Results of Operations and Financial Condition:The company is subject to income taxes in both the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. The company’s provision for income taxes and cash tax liability in the future could be negatively affected by numerous factors including, but not limited to, income before taxes being lower than anticipated in countries with lower statutory tax rates and higher than anticipated in countries with higher statutory tax rates, changes in the valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities, and changes in tax laws, regulations, accounting principles or interpretations thereof, which could negatively impact the company’s results of operations and financial condition in future periods. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) is issuing guidelines that are different, in some respects, than long-standing international tax principles. As countries unilaterally amend their tax laws to adopt certain parts of the OECD guidelines, this may increase tax uncertainty and may negatively impact the company’s income taxes. Local country, state, provincial or municipal taxation may also be subject to review and potential override by regional, federal, national or similar forms of government.

The company’s U.S. federal and certain state and foreign operations are included in various IBM consolidated tax returns and therefore are not directly subject to corporate income taxes but instead settle their tax liabilities with IBM. Any subsequent tax assessments or benefits resulting from tax examinations are the responsibility of IBM. For separate income tax return filings for jurisdictions that are not included in IBM’s tax return, the company is subject to the continuous examination of such income tax returns by tax authorities in those jurisdictions. The company regularly assesses the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of its provision for income taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these continuous examinations will not have an adverse effect on the company’s provision for income taxes and cash tax liability.

The Company Could beBe Impacted by itsIts Business with Government Clients: The company’s clients include numerous governmental entities and clients whose primary customers are government-owned entities. Some of the company’s

14

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors – (continued)

agreements with these clients may be subject to periodic funding approval. Funding reductions or delays could negatively impact public sector demand for IBM’s products and services, and therefore, demand for the company’s financing offerings could be negatively impacted. Also, some agreements may contain provisions allowing the client to terminate without cause or may provide for higher liability limits for certain losses. In addition, the company could be suspended or debarred as a governmental contractor and could incur civil and criminal fines and penalties, which could negatively impact the company’s results of operations, financial results and financial results.

reputation.

The Company’s Use of Accounting Estimates Involves Judgment and Could Impact the Company’s Financial Results: The application of generally accepted accounting principles requires the company to make estimates and assumptions about certain items and future events that directly affect the company’s reported financial condition. In addition, adopting new accounting standards can also pose challenges to the company. The company’s most critical accounting estimates including the methods used by management to estimate the amount of uncollectible receivables are described in note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In addition, as discussed in note J,K, “Contingencies and Commitments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the company makes certain estimates including decisions related to

Item 1A. Risk Factors – (continued)

legal proceedings and reserves. These estimates and assumptions involve the use of judgment. As a result, actual financial results may differ.

Ineffective Internal Controls Could Impact the Company’s Business and Operating Results: The company’s internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error, the circumvention or overriding of controls, or fraud. Even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements. If the company fails to maintain the adequacy of its internal controls, including any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or if the company experiences difficulties in its implementation, the company’s business and operating results could be harmed and the company could fail to meet its financial reporting obligations.

Risks Related to the Company’s SecuritiesSecurities:: The company issues debt securities in the capital markets from time to time, with a variety of different maturities. The value of the company’s debt securities fluctuates based on many factors, including the methods employed for calculating principal and interest, the maturity of the securities, the aggregate principal amount of securities outstanding, the redemption features for the securities, the level, direction and volatility of interest rates, changes in exchange rates, exchange controls, governmental regulations and other factors over which the company has little or no control. The company’s ability to pay interest and repay the principal for its debt securities is dependent upon its ability to manage its business operations, as well as the other risks described under this Item 1A, “Risk Factors.” There can be no assurance that the company will be able to manage any of these risks successfully. In addition, changes by any rating agency to the company’s outlook or credit ratings can negatively impact the value and liquidity of the company’s debt securities. The company does not make a market in its debt securities and cannot provide any assurances with respect to the liquidity or value of such securities. Further, a secondary market may never develop or be maintained for any series of the debt securities. If a secondary market does develop, it may not continue or it may not be sufficiently liquid to allow bondholders to resell debt securities if or when desired or at a price that bondholders consider acceptable.

15

Table of Contents

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties.

IBM Credit’s principal executive offices are located in an office building owned by IBM in Armonk, New York. The company is globally located and conducts its business primarily from IBM leased or IBM owned facilities around the world. IBM charges the company for the use of these facilities.facilities based on square footage space usage with no fixed term commitment. For additional information regarding the company’s shared facilities, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

See note J,K, “Contingencies and Commitments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

16

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

IBM Credit is a Delaware limited liability company and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of IBM. At December 31, 2017,2019, all limited liability company interests in IBM Credit were owned by the Member, which is also an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of IBM. The company has no other class of equity securities issued and outstanding. Dividends are declared and paid by IBM Credit as determined by its Board of Managers. The company paid $531$1,231 million in cash distributions to IBM during 2017, of which $94 million was distributed in the first quarter, prior to the company converting to the consolidated basis of reporting, and is recorded in net transfers to IBM in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and Consolidated Statement of Member’s Interest.2019.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

IBM Credit has omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(a) of Form 10-K.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The “Management Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” (Management Discussion and Analysis) is designed to provide readers with an overview of the business and a narrative on the company’s financial results and certain factors that may affect its future prospects from the perspective of the company’s management. The Management Discussion and Analysis presents an overview of the key performance drivers in 2017.

2019.

The Management Discussion and Analysis contains the results of operations for each reportable segment of the business and a discussion of the company’s financial position and cash flows. The summary of key financial information presented within the Management Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto, and with Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements” included below.herein. Other key sections within the Management Discussion and Analysis include: “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and “Looking Forward”.Forward.”

Overview

IBM Credit generates revenue from the financing activities of its two operating segments, Client Financing and Commercial Financing.

The Client Financing segment generates revenue by providing leases and loan financing to end-user clients and IBM, as well as purchasing installment payment plans, leases, loans and participated receivables from IBM.

Lease and loan contracts between IBM Credit and end-user clients are included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as net financing receivables or equipment under operating leases, and the revenue is included as financing revenue or operating lease revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

In certain countries, IBM originates leases, loans and installment payment plans with its end-user clients and IBM Credit acquires the related receivables (and related assets forunderlying the leases) at a discounted purchase price under certain financing incentive programs. IBM Credit accounts for the acquisition of these receivables as a purchase of receivables in accordance with accounting guidance.receivables. These receivables are included within net financing receivables in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. Income is recognized by the company over the term of the financing, and the income is recorded as financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

For IBM Total Solution Offerings in certain countries, as well as for certain government and other contracts, IBM Credit is not a party to IBM’s contract with the end-user client. Instead, IBM directly provides the end-user client with the lease, loan or installment payment plan. Beginning in 2016, IBM Credit acquiredacquires a participation interest in IBM receivables that represents the financing portion of such transactions and assumes the associated credit risk of the IBM end-user client from IBM. These participation interests are included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as receivables

17

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

purchased/participated from IBM and the financing income earned from these receivables is included in financing revenue in

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. Prior to 2016, these receivables were part of the financing receivables in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

In certain countries, the company provides loans to IBM, primarily in support of its Global Technology Services & Cloud Platforms segment’s acquisition of IT assets used in external, revenue-producing client services contracts. This financing is included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as financing receivables from IBM. The financing income earned from these receivables is included in financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

Starting in 2016, with the formation of the new financing subsidiaries, theThe company sells to IBM equipment returned from lease at cost, which approximates fair value. In addition, IBM may migrate a client to new technology. In the event this migration results in an early termination of a lease, IBM will purchase the returned equipment from the company at a pre-negotiated price, which is a function of the discounted value of the scheduled future lease payments and the residual value. Net gains on these transactionsThese sales are recorded net within the Client Financing segment asin other (income) and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

The Commercial Financing segment provides working capital financing to suppliers, distributors and resellers of IT products and services where the company generally extends payment terms in the range of 30 to 90 days. A portion of the interest cost may include financing incentives from IBM or providers of OEM IT products and services to cover an interest-free period. Financing may take the form of loans to distributors and resellers, which are generally unsecured obligations of the clients, but may be collateralized by inventory or accounts receivable. Commercial Financing also includes factoring, in which IBM Credit purchases the receivable from suppliers, distributors or resellers. These financing transactions are included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as net financing receivables and the financing income is included in financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. Income earned from financing incentives related to Commercial Financing is included in financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings and is recognized over the term of the financing. Beginning in the second quarter of 2019 and continuing throughout the year, the company wound down the OEM IT portion of its Commercial Financing operations.

The company also purchases interests in certain of IBM’s trade and other accounts receivable at a discount and assumes the credit risk of IBM’s clients. These transactions are included in receivables purchased/participated from IBM in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and the financing income is included in financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. The discount is recognized as financing revenue over the term of the financing.

In the second quarter of 2019, IBM and the company suspended the program under which IBM Credit purchases interests in IBM’s trade accounts receivable. For additional information, see note F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM.”

The segments include an allocation ofcompany allocates interest expense and SG&A expense by the company to each of its operating segments. Interest expense is allocated based on average assets in each segment. SG&A expense is allocated based on a measurable financial driver, such as net margin.

Key drivers of the company’s financial results areinclude the overall health of the economy and its impact on corporate IT budgets, interest rates and originations. Financing originations, which determine the asset base of the annuity-like business, are also dependent upon the demand for IT products and services, IBM’s product cycles and services offerings as well asand client participation rates. Participation rates reflect the propensity of clients to finance their transaction through the company in lieu of paying the supplier up-front with cash or financing through a third party. The economy can also impact the credit quality of the company’s receivables portfolio and therefore the level of provision for credit losses. Interest rates and the overall economy (including currency fluctuations) can affect both revenue and net margin. Interest rates directly impact the company by increasing or decreasing financing revenue and associated borrowing costs.

On December 31, 2016, the company divested the assets and liabilities of its U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business to IBM. The operating results of this business are reported as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Financial Statements for 2016. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“U.S. tax reform”) was enacted in the U.S. This Act resulted in the company recognizing a fourth quarter provisional one-time net tax benefit of $162 million. For additional information, see note K, “Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Within the Management Discussion and Analysis, certain columns and rows and other figures may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes. Percentages reported are calculated from the underlying whole-dollar numbers.

18

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Year in Review

The following section provides a summary of the company’s consolidated financial results for 20172019 as compared to 2016:2018:

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Revenue

$

1,600

$

1,779

 

(10.1)

%

Net margin

$

913

$

1,083

 

(15.7)

%

Net margin percentage

 

57.1

%  

 

60.9

%  

(3.8)

pts.

Total expense and other (income)

$

295

$

352

 

(16.4)

%

Income before income taxes

$

619

$

731

 

(15.3)

%

Provision for income taxes

$

188

$

133

 

41.2

%

Net income

$

430

$

597

 

(27.9)

%

Net income margin

26.9

%  

33.6

%  

(6.7)

pts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Revenue

 

$

1,702

 

$

1,840

 

(7.5

)%

Net margin

 

$

1,109

 

$

1,170

 

(5.2

)%

Net margin percentage

 

65.2

%

63.6

%

1.6

pts.

Total expense and other (income)

 

$

354

 

$

450

 

(21.4

)%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

755

 

$

719

 

4.9

%

Provision for income taxes 1

 

$

5

 

$

222

 

(97.8

)%

Income from continuing operations 1

 

$

750

 

$

498

 

50.7

%

Income from continuing operations margin 1

 

44.1

%

27.0

%

17.0

pts.

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

$

 

$

131

 

NM

 

Net income 1

 

$

750

 

$

629

 

19.3

%

Yr.-to-Date

 

(Dollars in millions)

Percent

 

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Assets

$

28,412

$

39,497

 

(28.1)

%

Liabilities

$

25,726

$

36,076

 

(28.7)

%

Member’s interest

$

2,686

$

3,420

 

(21.5)

%

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

Debt-to-equity ratio*

 

9.0

x

8.9

x


*

The debt-to-equity ratio is calculated by dividing the total amount of debt outstanding by the total amount of Member’s interest in the company at the end of the reporting period presented.

(1)         The enactment of U.S. tax reform resulted in the company recognizing a provisional net benefit of $162 million in December 2017. The net benefit was primarily the result of the re-measurement of deferred tax balances to the new U.S. federal tax rate as well as the U.S. transition tax and any foreign tax costs on undistributed foreign earnings. As a result, Net Income, Return on Equity and Member’s Interest increased and Debt-to-Equity was reduced in the fourth quarter and for the full-year 2017.

NM - Not meaningful

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Total Assets

 

$

39,516

 

$

35,279

 

12.0

%

Total Liabilities

 

$

35,954

 

$

31,577

 

13.9

%

Total Member’s Interest

 

$

3,562

 

$

3,703

 

(3.8

)%

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Debt-to-Equity Ratio *

 

8.6

x

7.3

x

(Dollars in millions)

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

 

Net income (1)

$

430

$

597

Average equity (2)*

$

2,899

$

3,402

Return on equity (1)/(2)

 

14.8

%  

 

17.5

%


* The debt-to-equity ratio is calculated by dividing the total amount of debt outstanding by the total amount of Member’s interest in the company at the end of the reporting period presented.

Return on Equity

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

After tax income from continuing operations (1)

 

$

750

 

$

498

 

Average equity * (2)

 

$

3,375

 

$

3,639

 

Return on equity (1)/(2)

 

22.2

%

13.7

%


* Average of the ending balance of Member’s interest for the last five quarters on a continuing operations basis.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Financial Performance Summary for 2017 and 2016:

*

Average of the ending balance of Member’s interest for the last five quarters.

In 2017,2019, the company delivered revenue of $1,702$1,600 million and net income of $750$430 million. In 2016,2018, the company had revenue of $1,840$1,779 million, income from continuing operations of $498 million and income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $131 million, resulting in net income of $629$597 million. In 2017, return on equity was 22.2 percent as compared to 13.7 percent in the prior year.

Total revenue decreased $139$180 million, or 7.510.1 percent, in 20172019 as compared to 2016,2018, driven by a decrease in financing revenue of $123 million, or 8.5 percent, and by a decrease in operating lease revenue of $104$57 million, or 21.5 percent, and a17.0 percent. The decrease in financing revenue reflects the company’s Commercial Financing portfolio actions, which began in the second quarter of $35 million, or 2.6 percent.2019. The decreasedecline in operating lease revenue was mainly due to a declinelower average asset balance in average assets during 2017 as a result of a decrease in originations and asset sales to third parties. The decrease in financing revenue was due to a decline in yields on financing receivables, partially offset by an increase in average assets. Yields from any category of assets are the company’s rate of return on such assets and are calculated by dividing income from such assets by average assets during the period.

From a segment perspective, Client Financing revenue of $1,248 million in 2017 declined 14.2 percent as2019 compared to 2016. The decline was driven by a decrease in lease and loan average asset balances and yields, and a decline in operating leases. Commercial Financing revenue of $454 million in 2017 increased 17.7 percent as compared to 2016. The increase in revenue was driven by an increase in average assets, partially offset by a decline in yields.2018.

From a geographic perspective, revenue in 2017 declined across each of the geographies as compared to 2016. Americas revenue of $938 million declined 7.1 percent in 2017 as compared to 2016. EMEA revenue of $467 million declined 4.2 percent in 2017 as compared to the prior year. Asia Pacific revenue of $297 million declined 13.5 percent in 2017 as compared to 2016.

NetIn 2019, net margin, which is calculated as revenue less financing costs and depreciation of equipment under operating lease, was $1,109$913 million, in 2017. Net margin decreased $61a decrease of $170 million, or 5.215.7 percent, in 2017 as compared to 2016, driven by the decrease2018. The decline in revenue noted above,and increase in financing costs were partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense and financing cost. Depreciation expense decreased $76 million, or 24.7 percent, in 2017 as compared to 2016, primarily due to declines in operating lease average assets in 2017 aswhen compared to the prior year. The decrease in financing cost in 2017 was due to declining average interest rates as a result

19

Table of geographical mix of the asset portfolio, partially offset by an increase in average borrowings as compared to 2016. Net margin percentage of 65.2 percent in 2017 increased by 1.6 points compared to the prior year.Contents

Total expense and other (income) of $354 million decreased $96 million, or 21.4 percent, in 2017 compared to $450 million in 2016. The year to year decrease in expense and other (income) was driven by a decrease in provisions for credit losses; an increase in other (income) and expense primarily from the sale of equipment upon early lease termination as a result of client migrations to IBM’s z14 mainframe which became available late in the third quarter of 2017; and a reduction in SG&A.

Pre-tax income from continuing operations of $755 million in 2017 increased 4.9 percent as compared to the prior year. The increase in pre-tax income was driven by the decline in total expense and other (income), partially offset by the decline in net margin noted above. Pre-tax income from continuing operations margin percentage of 44.3 percent in 2017 increased on a year-to-year basis by 5.3 points.

The provision for income taxes decreased $217 million in 2017 compared to 2016 primarily due to the enactment of U.S. tax reform resulting in a provisional net benefit of $162 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. The net benefit was primarily the result of the re-measurement of deferred tax balances to the new U.S. federal tax rate as well as the U.S. transition tax and any foreign tax costs on undistributed foreign earnings. For additional information, see note K, “Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income from continuing operations increased $252 million, or 50.7 percent, in 2017 as compared to 2016. Income from continuing operations margin of 44.1 percent in 2017 increased 17.0 points year to year. The continuing operations effective tax rate was 0.6 percent in 2017 as compared to 30.8 percent in 2016, driven primarily by the one-time benefit from the enactment of U.S. tax reform and a more favorable geographic mix of earnings.

Net income increased $121 million in 2017 on a year-to-year basis. The increase was primarily driven by the decrease in the provision for income taxes due to the one-time benefit from the enactment of U.S. tax reform and the increase in other (income) and expense year to year, partially offset by the decline in financing margins and the decrease in net income from discontinued operations of $131 million related to the company’s divestiture of its U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business to IBM in 2016. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

The decline in depreciation expense was driven by lower average operating lease asset balances. Net margin percentage of 57.1 percent in 2019 decreased by 3.8 points compared to the prior year.

Total expense and other (income) of $295 million decreased $58 million, or 16.4 percent, in 2019 compared to $352 million in 2018.

Pre-tax income of $619 million in 2019 decreased 15.3 percent as compared to the prior year. Pre-tax income margin percentage of 38.7 percent in 2019 decreased on a year-to-year basis by 2.4 points.

The effective tax rate for 2019 was 30.5 percent, an increase of 12.2 points, as compared to 2018. The change in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury in January 2019 regarding U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (U.S. tax reform) repatriation tax (20 points). This was partially offset by a year-to-year benefit due to the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (GILTI) provision (5 points). For additional information, see note L, “Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Net income decreased $167 million on a year-to-year basis, primarily driven by the declines in net margin noted above. Return on equity from continuing operationsof 14.8 percent in 2017 increased2019 decreased by 8.52.7 points driven primarily by the increasedecrease in net income and a lower average equity balance year to year.

At December 31, 2017, the company continued to have the financial flexibility to support the business over the long term. Total assets of $39,516 million increased $4,237 million from December 31, 2016 driven by an increase in total financing receivables (which includes financing receivables, financing receivables from IBM and receivables purchased/participated from IBM) of $2,956 million and an increase in cash and cash equivalents of $908 million. Total liabilities of $35,954 million increased $4,378 million from December 31, 2016 driven by increases in debt of $3,447 million and accounts payable of $1,029 million. Member’s interest of $3,562 million decreased $141 million from December 31, 2016.

The company’s debt-to-equity ratio increased to 8.6 to 1 at December 31, 2017 as compared to the debt-to-equity ratio of 7.3 to 1 at December 31, 2016. Total Member’s interest decreased 3.8 percent to $3,562 million, while debt of $30,477 million increased $3,447 million, or 12.8 percent, in support of the company’s target debt-to-equity ratio of 9 to 1.

The company generated $1,034$231 million in cash flow from operating activities in 2017, an increase2019, a decrease of $25$868 million as compared to the prior year, driven by higher net cash payments to IBM related to outstanding accounts payable and higher net cash income tax payments. Investing activities were a reductionnet source of cash of $7,312 million in 2019 versus a net use of cash tax payments andof $1,903 million in 2018, primarily driven by a decrease in interest payments on debt.net short term financing receivables. Net cash used in investing activities of $1,482 million in 2017 was $2,433 million higher when compared to net cash provided in 2016 of $951 million, primarily driven by an increase in financing receivable originations and lower collections year to year. Net cash provided by financing activities of $1,308$7,679 million increased $2,949$7,649 million, when compared to the prior year use of cash of $1,641 million. The increased source of cash was driven primarily by higher net debt issuances and lower net distributions to IBM.funding requirements associated with financing receivables. The decrease in financing receivables reflects the wind down of the OEM IT Commercial Financing operations.

Business Segments and Capabilities

IBM Credit and its subsidiary companiessubsidiaries are reported by the company’s parent, IBM, as part of IBM’s Global Financing segment, which also includes IBM’s remanufacturing and remarketing business. The company’s operating segments, Client Financing and Commercial Financing, are business units that offer financing solutions based upon the needs of the company’s clients. Client Financing provides leases and loan financing to end-user clients and acquires installment payment plans offered to end-user clients by IBM; as well as acquires participation interests in IBM financing receivables for which the company assumes the IBM client’s credit risk from IBM. End-user clients are primarily IBM clients that elect to finance their acquisition of IBM’s hardware, software, and services, as well as OEM IT hardware, software and services, to meet their total solution requirements. In addition, the company provides loans to IBM, primarily in support of IBM’s Technology Services & Cloud Platforms segment’s acquisition of IT assets, which are used in its external, revenue-producing services contracts. Commercial Financing provides working capital financing for suppliers, distributors and resellers of IBM and OEM IT products and services. Commercial Financing also purchases interests in certain of IBM’s trade accounts receivable at a discount and assumes the credit risk of IBM’s client. The Client Financing and Commercial Financing business segments are described in more detail in Item 1, “Business.”

20

Table of Contents

Results of Continuing Operations

Segment Details

The following is an analysis of the 2017 reportable segment results as compared to 2016. The table below presents each reportable segment’s revenue and net margin results. Segment pre-tax income is the income from continuing operations before income taxes and excludes income from discontinued operations.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Client Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

1,248

 

$

1,455

 

(14.2

)%

Net margin

 

771

 

887

 

(13.1

)%

Net margin percentage

 

61.8

%

60.9

%

0.8

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

574

 

$

564

 

1.8

%

Pre-tax margin

 

46.0

%

38.8

%

7.2

pts.

Commercial Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

454

 

$

385

 

17.7

%

Net margin

 

338

 

283

 

19.3

%

Net margin percentage

 

74.5

%

73.5

%

1.0

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

181

 

$

155

 

16.3

%

Pre-tax margin

 

39.8

%

40.3

%

(0.5

)pts.

Total Segments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

1,702

 

$

1,840

 

(7.5

)%

Net margin

 

1,109

 

1,170

 

(5.2

)%

Net margin percentage

 

65.2

%

63.6

%

1.6

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

755

 

$

719

 

4.9

%

Pre-tax margin

 

44.3

%

39.1

%

5.3

pts.

Results of Operations

Segment Details

The following is an analysis of the reportable segment results for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The table below presents each reportable segment’s revenue, net margin, and pre-tax income results.

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

    

    

Margin

 

    

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Client Financing

  

 

  

 

  

Revenue

$

1,187

$

1,206

 

(1.6)

%

Net margin

 

624

 

677

 

(7.8)

%

Net margin percentage

 

52.6

%  

 

56.1

%  

(3.6)

pts.

Pre-tax income

$

434

$

490

 

(11.4)

%

Pre-tax margin

 

36.6

%  

 

40.7

%  

(4.1)

pts.

Commercial Financing

 

 

 

Revenue

$

413

$

574

 

(28.0)

%

Net margin

 

289

 

406

 

(28.8)

%

Net margin percentage

 

70.1

%  

 

70.8

%  

(0.7)

pts.

Pre-tax income

$

184

$

240

 

(23.2)

%

Pre-tax margin

 

44.6

%  

 

41.9

%  

2.8

pts.

Total Segments

 

 

 

Revenue

$

1,600

$

1,779

 

(10.1)

%

Net margin

 

913

 

1,083

 

(15.7)

%

Net margin percentage

 

57.1

%  

 

60.9

%  

(3.8)

pts.

Pre-tax income

$

619

$

731

 

(15.3)

%

Pre-tax margin

 

38.7

%  

 

41.1

%  

(2.4)

pts.

Client Financing

Client Financing revenue of $1,248$1,187 million in 20172019 decreased by $207$19 million, or 14.2 1.6 percent, as compared to 2016. The decrease in financing revenue was2018, driven by a decline in average assets and a decline in yields from leases and loans. The decline in yields was mainly driven by declining average interest rates in 2017 due to the geographical mix of assets, predominately due to lower asset balances in Brazil. An increase in financing revenue from financing receivables from IBM and financing receivables participated from IBM partially offset these declines. Operatingoperating lease revenue which declined $104$57 million, or 17.0 percent, mainly due to a decline in the average assets during 2017 as a resultasset balance in 2019. The decline was partially offset by financing revenue which increased $38 million, or 4.3 percent, primarily driven by variable lease revenue reported in 2019 due to the adoption of a decrease in originations and asset sales to third parties.

the new lease standard.

Net margin decreased $116$53 million, or 13.17.8 percent, as compared to 2016.2018. The decrease was driven by lower revenue as noted above and an increase in interest expense of $40 million due to higher interest rates, partially offset by lower average debt balances in 2019.

Pre-tax income decreased $56 million, or 11.4 percent, in 2019 as compared to 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by the decline in net margin noted above and a decrease in profit from sales of equipment upon lease termination of $20 million, partially offset by lower provisions for credit losses of $28 million.

Commercial Financing

Commercial Financing revenue of $413 million in 2019 declined $161 million, or 28.0 percent, as compared to 2018, primarily reflecting the wind down of the OEM IT Commercial Financing operations.

Net margin decreased $117 million, or 28.8 percent, as compared to 2018. The decrease was driven by the decline in revenue declineas noted above, partially offset by a decrease in depreciationinterest expense of $76 million and a$44 million. The decrease in interest expense

21

Table of $15 million. The decrease in depreciation was due to the decline in average assets during the year as noted above, and the decrease in interest expense was due to lower average debt in higher interest rate countries during 2017.

Pre-tax income increased $10 million, or 1.8 percent, in 2017 as compared to 2016. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in equipment sales to IBM of $80 million and a decline in the provision for credit losses of $43 million, partially offset by a decline in net margin of $116 million. The increase in equipment sales to IBM was driven by a higher level of early lease terminations as a result of client migration to IBM’s z14 mainframe. The decline in the provision for credit losses in 2017 was primarily due to lower specific reserve requirements in Latin America. At December 31, 2017, the allowance for credit losses coverage was 0.9 percent, a decrease of 41 basis points as compared to December 31, 2016.

Contents

Commercial Financing

Commercial Financing revenue of $454 million in 2017 increased $68 million, or 17.7 percent, as compared to 2016. The growth in revenue was driven by an increase in average financing receivable assets due to increased volumes primarily with existing OEM IT suppliers, partially offset by a decline in yields from these investments during the year due to competitive market conditions and lower interest rates in 2017.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

was mainly due to the lower average debt balances in 2019 in support of a lower asset base, partially offset by higher interest rates, when compared to the prior-year period.

Net margin increased $55Pre-tax income decreased $56 million, or 19.323.2 percent, as compared to 2016. The increase was driven by an increase in revenue as noted above, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $14 million. The increase in interest expense was due to higher average asset balances in 2017.

Pre-tax income increased $25 million, or 16.3 percent, as compared to 20162018, driven primarily by the increasedecrease in net margin noted above and lower releases of provisions for credit losses of $14 million, partially offset by an increaselower SG&A expenses of $32 million which was in SG&A expenseline with the segment’s performance. Pre-tax income also includes a gain of $21 million.$16 million from divested commercial financing capabilities. For additional information, see note O, “Divestiture,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Geographic Revenue

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

Percent

 

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Revenue

$

1,600

$

1,779

 

(10.1)

%

Geographies

 

 

  

 

Americas

$

958

$

1,018

 

(5.9)

%

Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA)

 

375

 

468

 

(19.9)

Asia Pacific

 

267

 

294

 

(9.0)

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Revenue

 

$

1,702

 

$

1,840

 

(7.5

)%

Geographies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

938

 

$

1,010

 

(7.1

)%

Europe/Middle East/Africa

 

467

 

488

 

(4.2

)

Asia Pacific

 

297

 

343

 

(13.5

)

Americas revenue of $938$958 million decreased $72$60 million, or 7.15.9 percent, in 20172019 as compared to 2016,2018, driven primarily by a declinedeclines in financing revenue of $36 million, as well as declines in operating lease revenue of $58$24 million.

EMEA revenue of $467$375 million decreased $21$93 million, or 4.219.9 percent, in 20172019 as compared to 2016,2018, driven primarily by a declinedeclines in financing revenue of $75 million, as well as declines in operating lease revenue of $17$18 million.

Asia Pacific revenue of $297$267 million decreased $46$27 million, or 13.59.0 percent, in 20172019 as compared to 2016,2018, driven primarily by a declinedeclines in operating lease revenue of $29$14 million, as well as declines in financing revenue of $12 million.

The declines in financing revenue across all geographies reflect the Commercial Financing portfolio actions.

Total Expense and Other(Income)

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Total expense and other (income)

 

  

 

  

 

  

Selling, general and administrative

$

372

$

375

 

(0.8)

%

Provisions for/(benefit from) credit losses

 

(5)

 

9

 

NM

Other (income) and expense

 

(72)

 

(31)

 

132.8

Total expense and other (income)

$

295

$

352

 

(16.4)

%

Total expense-to-revenue ratio

 

18.4

%  

 

19.8

%  

(1.4)

pts.

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Total expense and other (income)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

378

 

$

388

 

(2.7

)%

Provisions for credit losses

 

15

 

72

 

(78.7

)

Other (income) and expense

 

(39

)

(9

)

317.3

 

Total expense and other (income)

 

$

354

 

$

450

 

(21.4

)%

Total expense-to-revenue ratio

 

20.8

%

24.5

%

(3.7

)pts.

NM - Not meaningful

Total expense and other (income) of $354$295 million in total expense decreased $96$58 million, or 21.416.4 percent, in 20172019 as compared to 2016.2018. For additional information regarding total expense and other (income), see the following analysis by category.

22

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Selling, General and Administrative

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

Percent

 

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Selling, general and administrative expense:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Selling, general and administrative - other

$

159

$

153

 

3.6

%

Contracted services

 

18

 

18

 

(0.9)

Functional support services and other related party expenses

 

195

 

204

 

(4.6)

Total selling, general and administrative expense

$

372

$

375

 

(0.8)

%

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative - other

 

$

132

 

$

141

 

(6.2

)%

Contracted services

 

28

 

24

 

13.4

 

Functional support services and other related party expenses

 

218

 

223

 

(2.3

)

Total selling, general and administrative expense

 

$

378

 

$

388

 

(2.7

)%

Total SG&A expense decreased $11$3 million, or 2.70.8 percent, as compared to 2016,2018, due to a decrease in SG&A-other expense of $9 million, a decrease in functional support services expense charged to the company by IBM of $5$9 million, partially offset by an increase in contracted services expenseother SG&A of $3$6 million. For additional information on support expenses charged by IBM, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Provision for Credit Losses

Provisions for credit losses decreased $56were a release of $5 million or 78.7 percent,in 2019 as compared to 2016, due to higher general reservesadditions of $9 million in Brazil in 2016,2018, driven by lower specific reserve requirements, partially offset by higher specific reservesa lower unallocated reserve release in Europe in 2017.the current year. For additional information on provisions for credit losses, see note E,F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other (Income) and Expense

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

Percent

 

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Other (income) and expense

 

  

 

  

 

  

Foreign currency transaction (gains)/losses

$

1

$

10

(90.3)

%

(Gains)/losses on derivative instruments

 

 

(7)

 

(100.0)

(Gains)/losses on sale of equipment upon lease termination

 

(78)

 

(98)

 

(20.7)

Other expense and (income)

 

5

 

65

 

(92.0)

Total other (income) and expense

$

(72)

$

(31)

132.8

%

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Other (income) and expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency transaction (gains)/losses

 

$

(214

)

$

73

 

$

NM

 

(Gains)/losses on derivative instruments

 

240

 

(70

)

NM

 

(Gains)/losses on sale of equipment upon lease termination

 

(117

)

(37

)

(214.7

)%

Other expense and (income)

 

52

 

24

 

114.8

%

Total other (income) and expense

 

$

(39

)

$

(9

)

$

317.3

%

NM - Not Meaningful

Total other (income) and expense was income$72 million of $39 million,income, an increase of $29$41 million in 20172019 as compared to 2016.2018. Other (income) and expense includes losses on derivative instruments of $240 million, partially offset by foreign currency transaction gains of $214declined $59 million, in 2017. The lossesline with the wind down of the OEM IT Commercial Financing operations, and included a pre-tax gain of $16 million from foreign currency transactions of $73 milliondivested commercial financing capabilities. Year-to-year declines in the prior yearother expense were partially offset by gains on derivative instruments of $70a $20 million in 2016. For additional information on currency impacts and derivative instruments, see note D, “Financial Instruments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The increasedecrease in gains on sale of equipment was driven by a higher level of sales of equipment to IBMreturned upon early lease termination primarily due to client migration to IBM’s z14 mainframe during the fourth quarter of 2017. Other expense and (income) increased year-to-year due primarily to credit insurance recoveries in the Commercial Financing portfolio recognized as other (income) in the prior year.termination.

Income Taxes

The continuing operations effective tax rate for 20172019 was 0.630.5 percent, a decreasean increase of 30.212.2 points, as compared to 2016.2018. The fourth quarter net benefit of $162 million related to the impact of the enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act resultedincrease in a decrease to

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

the effective tax rate of 21.4 percent. Without this benefit, the continuing operations tax rate would have been 22.1 percent, as compared to 30.8 percent in 2016, with the remaining change in the rate year to yearwas primarily driven by the following factors:

·                  Aimpacts of U.S. tax reform (20 points) and was partially offset by a year-to-year benefit due to the geographic mix of pre-tax earnings in 2017 of 11.3 points; partially offset byGILTI provision (5 points).

·                  An increase in year-to-year valuation allowances in certain foreign separate income tax returns of 1.7 points, and

·                  An increase due to the establishment of reserves for uncertain tax liabilities related to certain foreign separate income tax returns of 0.8 points.

Results of Discontinued Operations

The U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business was divested to IBM at December 31, 2016, and therefore, is reflected as discontinued operations in 2016. The income from discontinued operations, net of tax, in 2016 was $131 million. There was no gain or loss recognized on the divestiture in 2016. There was no income from discontinued operations in 2017. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Financial Position Summary

The company’s primary use of funds is to originate financing receivables and operating leases with end-users, suppliers, distributors, resellers and IBM. Financing receivables consist of direct financingsales-type leases and loans to end-user clients, purchases of installment payment plans from IBM and working capital financing to suppliers, distributors and resellers. Operating leases are for IBM and OEM IT products. Beginning in the second quarter of 2019 and continuing throughout

23

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

the year, the company wound down the OEM IT portion of its Commercial Financing operations. For additional information see note F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM.”

Receivables purchased/participated from IBM include purchased interests in certain of IBM’s trade and other accounts receivable and IBM receivables that have been participated to IBM Credit. In the second quarter of 2019, IBM and the company suspended the program under which IBM Credit purchases interests in IBM's trade accounts receivable. For additional information see note F, "Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM." Financing receivables from IBM include loan financing to IBM’s Global Technology Services & Cloud Platforms’ segment. For additional information relating to financing activities with IBM, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions.”

Total assets of $39,516$28,412 million at December 31, 2017, increased $4,2372019, decreased $11,085 million (including an increasea decrease of $1,520$27 million from currency), as compared to year-end 2016,2018, driven by:

·An increase in net financing receivables of $1,385 million (including an increase of $926 million from currency) primarily driven by Commercial Financing originations; and

·An increase in receivables purchased/participated from IBM of $1,342 million (including an increase of $236 million from currency) driven by an increase in receivable interests participated from IBM; and

·An increase in cash and cash equivalents of $908 million (including an increase of $48 million from currency); and

·An increase in other receivables from IBM of $542 million (including an increase of $178 million from currency) primarily relating to an increase in excess cash invested with IBM; and

·                  An increase in financing receivables from IBM of $229 million (including an increase of $92 million from currency).

A decline in total financing receivables of $9,298 million (including a decrease of $25 million from currency), primarily driven by a decline in commercial financing receivables of $7,987 million and a decline in purchased receivables from IBM of $1,313 million. These declines reflect the Commercial Financing portfolio actions. For additional information see note F, "Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM;" and
A decline in other receivables from IBM of $1,505 million (including an increase of $2 million from currency), predominantly due to a decrease in cash invested with IBM of $1,504 million. For additional information relating to other receivables from IBM, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions.”

At December 31, 2017,2019, substantially all Client Financing and Commercial Financing assets were IT related assets, and approximately 5462 percent of the company’s total asset portfolio, excluding financing receivables from IBM and receivables purchased from IBM, was with investment grade clients with no direct exposure to consumers.consumers, an increase of 7 points year to year. This investment grade percentage is based on the credit ratings of the companies in the portfolio. Additionally, the company takes actions to transfer exposure to third parties. On that basis, the investment grade content would increase by 17to 68 percent, a decrease of 4 points year to 71 percent.

For additional information relating to other receivables with IBM originating from cash invested with IBM, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

year.

Total liabilities of $35,954$25,726 million at December 31, 2017, increased $4,3782019, decreased $10,351 million (including an increase of $1,077$1 million from currency), as compared to year-end 20162018 primarily driven by:

A decrease in total debt of $6,439 million (including a decrease of $58 million from currency) driven by lower funding requirements associated with financing receivables;
A decline in accounts payable to IBM of $2,709 million (including an increase of $59 million from currency), which reflects the settlements of purchases of equipment and receivables/loans (for software and services); and
A decline in accounts payable to third parties of $1,271 million (including an increase of $2 million from currency), primarily driven by the wind down of the OEM IT Commercial Financing operations.

Total Member’s interest of $2,686 million at December 31, 2019 decreased $735 million as compared to December 31, 2018, as a result of:

Cash distributions to IBM of $1,231 million; partially offset by
Net income of $430 million, and
Non-cash capital contribution from IBM of $64 million.

24

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

·                  An increase in debt with third parties of $5,055 million (including an increase of $6 million from currency) driven by the third-quarter 2017 debt securities issuance of $3,000 million and an increase in commercial paper of $1,496 million;

·                  An increase in accounts payable to IBM of $775 million (including an increase of $29 million from currency) driven primarily by higher volumes transacted late in the fourth quarter year-to-year in the Client Financing and Commercial Financing portfolios; partially offset by

·                  A decline in debt payable to IBM of $1,608 million (including an increase of $977 million from currency).

Total Member’s interest of $3,562 million decreased $141 million from December 31, 2016, as a result of:

·Net transfers to IBM ($942 million) and distributions to IBM ($437 million); partially offset by

·Increases from net income ($750 million), foreign currency translation ($365 million) and contributions from IBM ($121 million).

Originations of Financing Receivables and Operating Leases

Originations are management’s estimate of the gross additions for Client Financing and Commercial Financing assets. There are no industry standards or requirements governing the reporting of financing asset originations. Management believes that the estimated values of financing asset originations disclosed in the table below provide insight into the potential future cash flows and earnings of the company.

The Client Financing origination values presented below include participations and exclude the company’s loans to IBM’s Global Technology Services & Cloud Platforms segment, which are executed under a loan facility and are not considered originations.

Originations

Yr.-to-Yr.

(Dollars in millions)

 

Percent

 

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Client Financing

$

14,252

$

14,300

 

(0.3)

%

Commercial Financing

 

35,627

 

70,138

 

(49.2)

%

Total originations

$

49,878

$

84,438

 

(40.9)

%

Originations

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Client Financing

 

$

13,191

 

$

11,611

 

13.6

%

Commercial Financing 1

 

63,019

 

53,983

 

16.7

%

Total originations

 

$

76,210

 

$

65,594

 

16.2

%


(1) Commercial Financing originations in 2016 were recast to conform with a change in currency calculation methodology in 2017.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the company originated $13,191$14,252 million of Client Financing leases and loans, as compared to $11,611$14,300 million for the year ending December 31, 2016.2018. The year-to-year increasedecrease of $1,580$48 million was driven by higherlower OEM IT originations in the Americas in partcurrent year, partially offset by higher lease volumes due to client migration to the IBM z14z15 mainframe. For the year ending December 31, 2017,2019, the company originated $63,019$35,627 million of Commercial Financing receivables as compared to $53,983$70,138 million for the year ending December 31, 2016.2018. The year-to-year increasedecrease of $9,036$34,512 million was driven by higher originations primarily inas compared to the Americas, mainly due to increases in OEM IT originations with existing OEM suppliers and in IBM originations.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)prior year end reflects the Commercial Financing portfolio actions. For additional information see note F, "Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM."

Segment Assets

Client Financing

Commercial Financing

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

Yr.-to-Yr.

(Dollars in millions)

Percent

Percent

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Financing receivables, net

$

13,978

$

14,474

 

(3.4)

%  

$

3,387

$

11,374

 

(70.2)

%

Equipment under operating leases, net

 

212

 

386

 

(45.1)

 

 

 

Financing receivables from IBM

 

3,870

 

3,609

 

7.2

 

 

 

Receivables purchased/participated from IBM, net

 

4,303

 

4,065

 

5.9

 

56

 

1,369

 

(95.9)

Total assets

$

22,362

$

22,533

 

(0.8)

%  

$

3,443

$

12,743

 

(73.0)

%

 

 

Client Financing

 

Commercial Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Financing receivables, net

 

$

14,939

 

$

15,244

 

(2.0

)%

$

11,127

 

$

9,436

 

17.9

%

Equipment under operating leases, net

 

401

 

506

 

(20.8

)

 

 

 

Financing receivables from IBM

 

3,743

 

3,513

 

6.5

 

 

 

 

Receivables purchased/participated from IBM, net

 

3,798

 

2,423

 

56.8

 

1,441

 

1,474

 

(2.3

)

Total assets

 

$

22,880

 

$

21,687

 

5.5

%

$

12,568

 

$

10,911

 

15.2

%

Total Client Financing assets of $22,880$22,362 million at December 31, 2017 increased $1,1942019 decreased $172 million as compared to year-end 2016.2018. The increasedecline in Client Financing assets was driven primarily by an increase in participated receivables from IBM as well as financing receivables from IBM. This increase was offset by a decline in net financing receivables, driven by cash collections in excess of new originations within the lease portfolio and declines in operating leases due to lower originations and asset sales.

Total Commercial Financing assets of $12,568 million at December 31, 2017 increased $1,657 million as compared to year-end 2016. The increase in Commercial Financing assets was driven by new originations exceeding cash collections, partially offset by a decreaseincreases in purchased receivables from IBM. The growth in new originations was primarily driven by increased volumes with existing OEM IT suppliers. The reduction in purchasedfinancing receivables from IBM was due to a decrease in purchased interests in certain of IBM’s trade accounts receivable.and receivables participated from IBM.

The company’sClient Financing receivables portfolio at December 31, 20172019 represented the following industry profile: Financial (36 percent), Manufacturing (15 percent), Government (13 percent), Services (11 percent), Retail (7 percent), Communications (6 percent), Healthcare (6 percent) and Other (5 percent). The receivables portfolio at December 31, 2018 represented the following industry profile: Financial (33 percent), Government (15(14 percent), Manufacturing (13(14 percent), Services (13 percent), Retail (8 percent), Communications (6 percent), Healthcare (6 percent) and Other (6 percent). The company’s receivables portfolio at December 31, 2016 represented the following industry profile: Financial (34 percent), Government (14 percent), Manufacturing (13 percent), Services (12 percent), Retail (8(7 percent), Communications (7 percent), Healthcare (6 percent) and Other (6 percent).

The decrease in Commercial Financing assets of $9,300 million at December 31, 2019, as compared to December 31, 2018, reflects the Commercial Financing portfolio actions. For additional information relating to financing receivables with IBM, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information on the company’s debt, see note G, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.F, "Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM."

25

Table of Contents

Financing Receivables and Allowances

The following table presents net financing receivables excluding residual values and the allowance for credit losses, as well as loan financing to IBM’s Technology Services & Cloud Platforms segment which the company considers collectable and without third party risk.

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Gross financing receivables

 

$

31,004

 

$

28,387

 

Specific allowance for credit losses

 

107

 

148

 

Unallocated allowance for credit losses

 

106

 

130

 

Total allowance for credit losses

 

213

 

277

 

Net financing receivables

 

$

30,791

 

$

28,109

 

Allowance for credit losses coverage

 

0.7

%

1.0

%

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

The financing assets of the company were funded with $24,095 million of total debt at December 31, 2019, as compared to $30,534 million of debt at December 31, 2018. The decline of $6,439 million was primarily driven by lower funding requirements associated with financing receivables.

Financing Receivables and Allowances

The following table presents net financing receivables (excluding residual values and loan financing to IBM’s Global Technology Services segment, which the company considers collectable and without third party risk) and the allowance for credit losses.

    

(Dollars in millions)

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

 

Recorded investment

$

21,301

$

30,906

Specific allowance for credit losses

 

114

 

121

Unallocated allowance for credit losses

 

42

 

71

Total allowance for credit losses

 

155

 

192

Net financing receivables

$

21,145

$

30,714

Allowance for credit losses coverage

 

0.7

%

 

0.6

%

Roll Forward of Financing Receivables Allowance for Credit Losses

(Dollars in millions)

January 1, 2019

    

Additions / (Releases)

    

Write-offs *

    

Other **

    

December 31, 2019

$

192

$

(5)

$

(32)

$

(1)

$

155

January 1, 2017

 

Additions

 

Write-offs *

 

Other **

 

December 31, 2017

 

$

277

 

$

15

 

$

(91

)

$

11

 

$

213

 

*    Represents reserved receivables net of recoveries, that were written off during the period.

**  Primarily represents translation adjustments.

The allowance for credit losses on financing receivables at December 31, 20172019 was $213$155 million, or 0.7 percent of gross financing receivables. At December 31, 2016,2018, the allowance for credit losses on financing receivables was $277$192 million, or 1.00.6 percent, of gross financing receivables.

Specific reserves decreased $41$7 million to $107$114 million at December 31, 20172019 as compared to December 31, 2016, primarily2018, due to write offs of previously reserved receivableswrite-offs, partially offset by higher reserve requirements in China and Brazil.

the Americas.

Unallocated reserves were $106decreased $30 million to $42 million at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $23 million2019, as compared to December 31, 2016, primarily due to higher general2018, driven by lower reserve requirements as a result of lower asset balances in Brazil during 2016.the Client Financing and Commercial Financing businesses.

Bad debt expense was $15Provisions for credit losses were a release of $5 million in 20172019 as compared to $72$9 million of additions in 2016.2018. The year-to-year decrease in bad debt expense was due to higherdriven by lower specific reserve requirements, partially offset by a lower unallocated reserve release in Brazil during 2016.the current year.

Residual Value

Residual value is a risk of the company’s business, and management of this risk is dependent upon the ability to accurately project future equipment values at lease inception. The company has insight into product plans and cycles for IBM products and closely monitors OEM IT product announcements. Based upon this product information, the company continually monitors projections of future equipment values and compares them with the residual values reflected in the portfolio.

26

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

The company optimizes the recovery of residual values by extending lease arrangements with current clients. Assets returned from lease are sold to IBM at cost, which approximates fair value. In addition, IBM may migrate a client to new technology. In the event this migration results in an early termination of a lease, IBM will purchase the returned equipment from the company at a pre-negotiated price, which is a function of the discounted value of the scheduled future lease payments and the residual value.

The following table presents the recorded amount of unguaranteed residual value for sales-type and direct financing andleases, as well as operating leases at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018. In addition, the table presents the residual value as a percentage of the related original amount financed and a run out of when the unguaranteed residual value assigned to equipment on leases at December 31, 20172019 is expected to be returned to the company.

Unguaranteed Residual Value

Total

Estimated Run Out of 2019 Balance

(Dollars in millions)

2023 and

At December 31:

    

2018

    

2019

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

    

Beyond

Sales-type and direct financing leases

$

491

$

531

$

99

$

133

$

183

$

117

Operating leases

 

114

 

84

 

55

 

23

 

3

 

3

Total unguaranteed residual value

$

605

$

615

$

154

$

156

$

186

$

120

Related original amount financed

$

10,148

$

9,048

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Percentage

 

6.0

%  

 

6.8

%  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Consolidated Fourth-Quarter Financial Results

    

    

    

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

Margin

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

2019

2018

Change

 

Revenue

$

335

$

446

 

(24.8)

%

Net margin

$

194

$

256

 

(24.2)

%

Net margin percentage

 

58.0

%  

 

57.5

%  

0.4

pts.

Total expense and other (income)

$

36

$

48

 

(25.0)

%

Income before income taxes

$

158

$

208

 

(24.1)

%

Provision for/(benefit from) income taxes

$

(7)

$

21

 

NM

Net income

$

165

$

187

 

(11.8)

%

Net income margin

49.3

%  

42.0

%  

7.3

pts.

NM - Not meaningful

Fourth Quarter Financial Performance Summary:

In additionthe fourth quarter of 2019, the company delivered revenue of $335 million and net income of $165 million. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the company had revenue of $446 million and net income of $187 million.

Total revenue decreased $110 million, or 24.8 percent, in the fourth quarter of 2019 as compared to the unguaranteed residual value, onfourth quarter of 2018, driven by a limited basis, IBM Credit will obtain guarantees fromdecrease in financing revenue of $87 million, or 24.2 percent, and a third party fordecrease in operating lease revenue of $23 million, or 27.4 percent. The decrease in financing revenue reflects the future value of the equipmentCommercial Financing portfolio actions. The decline in operating lease revenue was due to be returned at end of lease. While primarily focused on IBM products, guarantees are also obtained for certain OEM IT products. These third-party guarantees are included in minimum lease payments as provided for by accounting standardsa lower average asset balance in the determination of lease classifications forcurrent period compared to the covered equipment and provide protection against risk of loss arising from declines in equipment values for these assets.prior-year period.

The residual value guarantee increases the minimum lease payments that are utilized in determining the classification of a lease as a direct financing lease or operating lease. The aggregate incremental asset value of direct financing leases of IBM equipment with residual value guaranteesNet margin was $698$194 million in 2017 and $329the fourth quarter of 2019, a decline of $62 million, in 2016, increasing on a year-to-year basis, primarily relatingor 24.2 percent, as compared to the IBM Z product announcementfourth quarter of 2018. The decrease was primarily driven by the decline in 2017. In addition, the company obtains guarantees from third parties for directrevenue, partially offset by a decline in financing leasescosts of OEM IT products. The aggregate incremental asset value of these leases was $153 million in 2017 and $169 million in 2016. The associated aggregate guaranteed future values at the scheduled end of lease of both IBM and OEM IT equipment were $43$34 million and $19 million for thea decrease in depreciation expense of $14 million. The decrease in financing transactions originated in 2017 and 2016, respectively. The costcosts

27

Table of guarantees was $4 million and $2 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Unguaranteed Residual Value

 

 

Total

 

Estimated Run Out of 2017 Balance

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2021 and

 

At December 31:

 

2016

 

2017

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

Beyond

 

Direct financing leases

 

$

532

 

$

533

 

$

116

 

$

162

 

$

134

 

$

122

 

Operating leases

 

100

 

76

 

23

 

24

 

18

 

11

 

Total unguaranteed residual value

 

$

632

 

$

610

 

$

139

 

$

187

 

$

151

 

$

133

 

Related original amount financed

 

$

11,510

 

$

10,851

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage

 

5.5

%

5.6

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated Fourth-Quarter Financial Results

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Margin

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Revenue

 

$

427

 

$

439

 

(2.7

)%

Net margin

 

$

280

 

$

281

 

(0.6

)%

Net margin percentage

 

65.4

%

64.0

%

1.4

pts.

Total expense and other (income)

 

$

13

 

$

91

 

(85.7

)%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

267

 

$

191

 

39.8

%

Provision for/(benefit from) income taxes 1

 

$

(107

)

$

55

 

NM

 

Income from continuing operations 1

 

$

374

 

$

136

 

175

%

Income from continuing operations margin 1

 

87.5

%

30.9

%

56.6

pts.

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

$

 

$

62

 

NM

 

Net income 1

 

$

374

 

$

198

 

89.3

%


(1) The enactmentwas driven by a decrease in interest expense. Net margin percentage of U.S. tax reform resulted in the company recognizing a provisional net benefit of $162 million in December 2017. The net benefit was primarily the result of the re-measurement of deferred tax balances to the new U.S. federal tax rate as well as the U.S. transition tax and any foreign tax costs on undistributed foreign earnings. As a result, Net Income, Return on Equity and Member’s Interest increased and Debt-to-Equity was reduced in the fourth quarter and for the full-year 2017.

NM - Not meaningful

Fourth Quarter Financial Performance Summary:

In the fourth quarter of 2017, the company delivered revenue of $427 million and income from continuing operations and net income of $374 million. In 2016, the company had revenue of $439 million, income from continuing operations of $136 million and income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $62 million, resulting in net income of $198 million.

Total revenue decreased $12 million, or 2.758.0 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016, driven by a decrease in operating lease revenue of $17 million, or 15.9 percent, partially offset by an increase in financing revenue of $5 million, or 1.7 percent. The decrease in operating lease revenue was primarily due to a decline in average assets due to lower originations and higher asset sales in 2017. The increase in financing revenue was primarily due to an increase in average assets, partially offset by a decline in yields.

From a segment perspective, Client Financing revenue of $303 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 declined 11.1 percent as compared to the same period in 2016. The decline was driven by a decrease in financing yields and lower operating lease revenue. Commercial Financing revenue of $124 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 increased 26.2 percent as compared to the same prior-year period. The increase in revenue was driven by an increase in financing yields and average assets.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

From a geographic perspective, revenue in the fourth quarter of 2017 declined in the Americas and Asia Pacific geographies while EMEA grew year to year. Americas revenue of $237 million declined 4.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016, primarily due to a decline in revenue from operating leases. EMEA revenue of $118 million increased 5.3 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the fourth quarter of the prior year, primarily due to an increase in Commercial Financing revenue. Asia Pacific revenue of $73 million decreased 9.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to a decline in operating lease revenue.

Net margin was $280 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, a decline of $2 million, or 0.6 percent, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. The decline year to year was driven by the decrease in revenue noted above and an increase in financing cost, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation expense. The increase in financing cost in the fourth quarter of 2017 was primarily due to an increase in average borrowings and higher interest rates as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. Depreciation expense decreased $19 million, or 26.2 percent, in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to declines in the average net investment in operating leases in 2017 as compared to the prior year. Net margin percentage of 65.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 20172019 increased by 1.40.4 points compared to the same period in the prior year.

Total expense and other (income) of $13$36 million decreased $78$12 million, or 85.725.0 percent, in the fourth quarter of 20172019 when compared to $91the fourth quarter of 2018.

Pre-tax income in the fourth quarter of 2019 of $158 million decreased 24.1 percent when compared to the fourth quarter of 2018. The pre-tax income margin percentage of 47.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2019 increased on a year-to-year basis by 0.4 points.

Provisions for income taxes were a benefit of $7 million in the fourth quarter of 2016. The year2019 compared to year decrease in$21 million of expense and other (income) was driven primarily by an increase in other (income) and expense from the sale of equipment to IBM and a reduction in SG&A, partially offset by an increase in provisions for credit losses. The increase in equipment sales to IBM is driven by a higher level of early lease terminations as a result of client migration to the IBM z14 mainframe.

Pre-tax income from continuing operations in the fourth quarter of 2017 of $267 million increased 39.8 percent as compared to the same period in the prior year. The2018, primarily driven by an increase in pre-taxforeign tax credits.

Net income was driven by the decline in total expense and other (income), partially offset by a decrease in net margin. The pre-tax income from continuing operations margin percentage of 62.4 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 increased on a year-to-year basis by 19.0 points.

Income taxes decreased $162$22 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to the fourth quarter of 2016 due to the enactment of U.S. tax reform in December 2017, resulting in a provisional net benefit of $162 million. The net benefit was primarily the result of the re-measurement of deferred tax balances to the new U.S. federal tax rate as well as the one-time U.S. transition tax and any foreign tax costs on undistributed foreign earnings. For additional information, see note K, “Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Income from continuing operations increased $238 million, or 175.2 percent, in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to the one-time benefit from the enactment of U.S. tax reform. Income from continuing operations margin of 87.5 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 increased 56.6 points year to year. The continuing operations effective tax rate was (40.3) percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to 28.7 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016, driven primarily by the one-time benefit from the enactment of U.S. tax reform.

Net income increased $176 million in the fourth quarter of 20172019 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. The increase was primarily driven2018, which reflects the wind down of the OEM IT Commercial Financing operations, partially offset by the decreasea decline in the effective tax rate in the fourth quarter of 2017 as noted above and the increase in other (income) and expense in the fourth quarter year-to-year, partially offset by the decline in net profit from discontinued operations of $62 million related2019 when compared to the company’s divestiture of its U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business to IBM as of December 31, 2016. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.prior-year period.

Results of Continuing Operations

Segment Details

The following is an analysis of the reportable segment results for the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2017,2019, as compared to the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2016.2018. The table below presents each reportable segment’s revenue, and net margin, results. Segmentand pre-tax income isresults.

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

Margin

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Client Financing

  

 

  

 

  

Revenue

$

281

$

293

 

(4.2)

%

Net margin

 

152

 

152

 

0.2

%

Net margin percentage

 

54.3

%  

 

51.9

%  

2.3

pts.

Pre-tax income

$

131

$

136

 

(4.2)

%

Pre-tax margin

 

46.5

%  

 

46.5

%  

0.0

pts.

Commercial Financing

 

 

 

Revenue

$

54

$

153

 

(64.4)

%

Net margin

 

42

 

104

 

(59.9)

%

Net margin percentage

 

76.9

%  

 

68.3

%  

8.6

pts.

Pre-tax income

$

28

$

72

 

(61.6)

%

Pre-tax margin

 

51.0

%  

 

47.3

%  

3.7

pts.

Total Segments

 

 

 

Total revenue

$

335

$

446

 

(24.8)

%

Net margin

 

194

 

256

 

(24.2)

%

Net margin percentage

 

58.0

%  

 

57.5

%  

0.4

pts.

Pre-tax income

$

158

$

208

 

(24.1)

%

Pre-tax margin

 

47.2

%  

 

46.8

%  

0.4

pts.

Client Financing

Client Financing revenue of $281 million in the income from continuing operations before income taxes and excludes income from discontinued operations.fourth quarter of 2019 decreased by $12 million, or 4.2 percent, as compared to the same period in 2018. The decrease in revenue was driven by a decline in operating lease revenue of $23

28

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the fourth quarter:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Client Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

303

 

$

341

 

(11.1

)%

Net margin

 

187

 

209

 

(10.4

)%

Net margin percentage

 

61.7

%

61.2

%

0.5

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

209

 

$

156

 

33.8

%

Pre-tax margin

 

68.9

%

45.8

%

23.1

pts.

Commercial Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

124

 

$

98

 

26.2

%

Net margin

 

92

 

73

 

27.3

%

Net margin percentage

 

74.4

%

73.8

%

0.6

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

58

 

$

35

 

66.9

%

Pre-tax margin

 

46.5

%

35.2

%

11.3

pts.

Total Segments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total revenue

 

$

427

 

$

439

 

(2.7

)%

Net margin

 

280

 

281

 

(0.6

)%

Net margin percentage

 

65.4

%

64.0

%

1.4

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

267

 

$

191

 

39.8

%

Pre-tax margin

 

62.4

%

43.4

%

19.0

pts.

Client Financing

Client Financing revenue of $303 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 decreased by $38 million, or 11.127.4 percent, as compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease in revenue was driven by a decline in yields, partially offset by an increase in average client financing receivables. Operating lease revenue declined $17 million mainly due to a decline in average assets during 2017 as a result2019. The decline was partially offset by variable lease revenue reported in the current-year period due to the adoption of a decrease in originations and asset sales to third parties.the new leasing standard.

Net margin was essentially flat, as compared to the same period in 2018. Net margin percentage of 54.3 percent increased by 2.3 points when compared to the prior-year period driven by a mix away from the operating lease portfolio.

Pre-tax income in the fourth quarter of 2019 decreased $22$6 million, or 10.44.2 percent, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2018, driven primarily by higher SG&A expense partially offset by higher profit from sales of equipment upon lease termination in the current-year period.

Commercial Financing

Commercial Financing revenue of $54 million in the fourth quarter of 2019 decreased $98 million, or 64.4 percent, as compared to the same period in 2016.2018. The decline reflects the Commercial Financing portfolio actions executed in 2019.

Net margin decreased $62 million, or 59.9 percent, in the fourth quarter of 2019 as compared to the same period in 2018. The decrease was driven by the revenue decline noted above and an increase in interest expense of $3 million,revenue, partially offset by a decrease in depreciationinterest expense of $19$36 million. The decrease in depreciationinterest expense was mainly due to the declinelower average debt balances in operating lease average2019 in support of a lower asset balances duringbase, partially offset by higher interest rates, when compared to the year as noted above. The increase in interest expense was due to an increase in average asset balances and an increase in interest rates.prior-year period.

Pre-tax income in the fourth quarter of 2017 increased $532019 decreased $44 million, or 33.861.6 percent, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. The increase was2018, driven primarily driven by an increasethe decline in other (income) from the sale of equipment to IBM of $68 million and a reduction in SG&A of $22 million,net margin partially offset by the decrease in the net margin mentioned above and an increase in provisions for credit losses of $19 million. The increase in other (income) is mainly driven by equipment sales to IBM due to a higher level of early lease terminations as a result of client migration to the IBM z14 mainframe. The decline inlower SG&A expense was driven primarily by a decrease in SG&A-other expense of $18 million and lower functional support services charged by IBM of $5 million in 2017. The increase in the provision for credit losses in the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to the fourth quarter of 2016 was due to higher specific reserves in Europe in the current year.year period.

Geographic Revenue

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

Percent

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Revenue

$

335

$

446

 

(24.8)

%

Geographies

 

 

  

 

Americas

$

209

$

261

 

(20.0)

%

Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA)

 

68

 

115

 

(41.4)

Asia Pacific

 

58

 

69

 

(15.1)

Commercial Financing

The declines in revenue across all geographies reflect the Commercial Financing revenueportfolio actions.

Total Expense and Other (Income)

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

Margin

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Total expense and other (income)

 

  

 

  

 

  

Selling, general and administrative

$

90

$

83

 

9.0

%

Provisions for/(benefit from) credit losses

 

(1)

 

(15)

 

(95.1)

Other (income) and expense

 

(54)

 

(20)

 

169.3

Total expense and other (income)

$

36

$

48

 

(25.0)

%

Total expense-to-revenue ratio

 

10.7

%  

 

10.7

%  

0.0

pts.

Total expense and other (income) of $124$36 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 increased $26expense decreased $12 million, or 26.2 percent, as compared to the same period in 2016. The growth in revenue was driven by an increase in yields and an increase in average asset balances with Commercial Financing clients due to an increase in volumes primarily with existing OEM IT suppliers.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Net margin increased $20 million, or 27.325.0 percent, in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The increase was driven by the growth in revenue noted above, partially offset by an increase in interest expense of $6 million due to an increase in average asset balances and an increase in interest rates.

Pre-tax income in the fourth quarter of 2017 increased $23 million, or 66.9 percent, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016, driven primarily by an improvement in net margin of $20 million and a decrease in provision for credit losses of $5 million.

Geographic Revenue

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Revenue

 

$

427

 

$

439

 

(2.7

)%

Geographies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

237

 

$

247

 

(4.2

)%

Europe/Middle East/Africa

 

118

 

112

 

5.3

 

Asia Pacific

 

73

 

80

 

(9.2

)

Americas revenue of $237 million decreased $10 million, or 4.2 percent, in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, driven primarily by declines in operating lease revenue of $12 million.

EMEA revenue of $118 million increased $6 million, or 5.3 percent, in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016, driven primarily by an increase in commercial financing revenue, partially offset by declines in client financing revenue.

Asia Pacific revenue of $73 million decreased $7 million, or 9.2 percent, in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily driven by a decline in operating lease revenue of $4 million.

Total Expense and Other (Income)

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Total expense and other (income)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

75

 

$

101

 

(26.0

)%

Provisions for/(benefits from) credit losses

 

5

 

(10

)

NM

 

Other (income) and expense

 

(66

)

0

 

NM

 

Total expense and other (income)

 

$

13

 

$

91

 

(85.7

)%

Total expense-to-revenue ratio

 

3.0

%

20.7

%

(17.6

)pts.

NM - Not meaningful

Total expense and other (income) of $13 million in expense decreased $78 million, or 85.7 percent, in the fourth quarter of 20172019 as compared to the prior-year fourth quarter.period. For additional information regarding total expense and other (income), see the following analysis by category.

29

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Selling, General and Administrative

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

Percent

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Selling, general and administrative expense:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Selling, general and administrative - other

$

36

$

37

 

(3.7)

%

Contracted services

 

6

 

5

 

17.2

Functional support services and other related party expenses

 

49

 

41

 

19.8

Total selling, general and administrative expense

$

90

$

83

 

9.0

%

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Selling, general and administrative expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative - other

 

$

25

 

$

43

 

(42.4

)%

Contracted services

 

5

 

8

 

(40.0

)

Functional support services and other related party expenses

 

45

 

50

 

(9.4

)

Total selling, general and administrative expense

 

$

75

 

$

101

 

(26.0

)%

Provision for Credit Losses

SG&A decreased $26Provisions for credit losses were a release of $1 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, driven by2019 as compared to a decrease in SG&A-other expenserelease of $18 million, a decrease in functional support services expense charged by IBM of $5 million and contracted services expense of $3 million.

Provision for Credit Losses

Provisions for credit losses increased $15 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 as compared to the fourth quarter of 2016,2018, primarily due todriven by higher specific reserves in Europereserve releases in the current year.prior-year period. For additional information on provisions for credit losses, see note E,F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other (Income) and Expense

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

Percent

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

Change

 

Other (income) and expense:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Foreign currency transaction (gains)/losses

$

(1)

$

1

 

NM

%

(Gains)/losses on derivative instruments

 

0

 

0

 

(100.0)

(Gains)/losses on sale of equipment upon lease termination

 

(50)

 

(37)

 

35.5

Other expense and (income)

 

(2)

 

16

 

NM

Total other (income) and expense

$

(54)

$

(20)

 

169.3

%

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the fourth quarter ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Change

 

Other (income) and expense

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency transaction (gains)/losses

 

$

(3

)

$

74

 

NM

 

(Gains)/losses on derivative instruments

 

(4

)

(70

)

(93.7

)%

(Gains)/losses on sale of equipment upon lease termination

 

(78

)

(10

)

NM

 

Other

 

19

 

6

 

224.3

%

Total other (income) and expense

 

$

(66

)

$

0

 

NM

 

NM - Not Meaningfulmeaningful

OtherTotal other (income) and expense was $66$54 million in income in the fourth quarter of 2017. Other (income) and expense was immaterial in2019, an increase of $34 million when compared to the fourth quarter of 2016. The increase2018. Other expense declined $18 million year to year, in income inline with the fourth quarterwind down of 2017 was primarily driven by a higher level of salesthe OEM IT Commercial Financing operations, and gains on the sale of equipment to IBM upon early lease termination mainly due toincreased $12 million as a result of client migration to IBM’s z15 mainframe in the IBM z14 mainframe. In the fourth quarter of 2017, the gains from foreign currency transactions and derivative instruments were $3 million and $4 million, respectively. In the fourth quarter of the priorcurrent year losses from foreign currency transactions of $74 million were mainly offset by gains from derivative instruments of $70 million. For additional information, see note D, “Financial Instruments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.period.

Income Taxes

The continuing operations effective tax rate for the fourth quarter of 20172019 was (40.3)negative 4.4 percent a decrease of 68.9 points, as compared to 10.2 percent in the fourth quarter of 2016.2018. The year-to-year declinedecrease in the effective tax rate in the period was primarily resulting from the enactment of U.S.driven by an increased benefit in foreign tax reform in December 2017.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)credits.

Results of Discontinued Operations

The U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business was divested to IBM at December 31, 2016, and therefore, is reflected as discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2016. The net income from discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2016 was $62 million. There was no gain or loss recognized on the divestiture in 2016. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Cash Flow

The company generated $427$135 million in cash flow from operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2017, an increase2019, a decrease of $22$151 million as compared to the same period in the prior year. Net cash used in investing activities of $1,457$2,062 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 was $4,8752019 increased by $1,012 million higher when compared to net cash provided in the fourth quarter of 2016 of $3,419 million.the prior year. This was driven by lower cash sourced from other receivables from IBM of $4,384 million and increased Commercial Financing originationshigher outflows in the current year.year to fund Client Financing originations. Net cash provided by financing activities of $1,812$1,519 million increased $5,555$888 million in the fourth quarter of 20172019 compared to the same period in 20162018, driven by year-to-year improvements from debt transactions with related parties of $3,353 million, the issuance of $1,496 million of commercial paper in 2017, and lower cash usedincreases in net equity transactions with IBMproceeds of $667 million.debt issuances from IBM.

30

Table of Contents

In the third quarter of 2016, $5.7 billion was invested with IBM and was subsequently borrowed by the company in the form of short-term debt in multiple currencies. These amounts were settled early in the fourth quarter of 2016 and are presented as separate cash flows. The cash invested with IBM is reflected within other receivables with IBM within investing activities and the subsequent borrowing from IBM is reflected within short-term borrowings from/(repayments to) IBM-net within financing activities in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as there was no netting arrangement in place at September 30, 2016.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Prior Year in Review

The following section providesRefer to pages 19 to 28 of IBM Credit’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on February 27, 2019, for a summary ofdiscussion on the company’s consolidated financial results in 2016performance for 2018 as compared to 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percent/

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

Revenue

 

$

1,840

 

$

2,074

 

(11.2

)%

Net margin

 

$

1,170

 

$

1,229

 

(4.9

)%

Net margin percentage

 

63.6

%

59.3

%

4.3

pts.

Total expense and other (income)

 

$

450

 

$

446

 

0.9

%

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

719

 

$

783

 

(8.1

)%

Provision for income taxes

 

$

222

 

$

311

 

(28.7

)%

Income from continuing operations

 

$

498

 

$

472

 

5.4

%

Income from continuing operations margin

 

27.0

%

22.8

%

4.3

pts.

Income from discontinued operations, net of tax

 

$

131

 

$

255

 

(48.6

)%

Net income

 

$

629

 

$

727

 

(13.6

)%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Percent

 

At December 31:

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

Total Assets

 

$

35,279

 

$

35,691

 

(1.2

)%

Total Liabilities

 

$

31,577

 

$

31,958

 

(1.2

)%

Total Member’s Interest

 

$

3,703

 

$

3,733

 

(0.8

)%

At December 31:

 

2016

 

2015

 

Debt-to-Equity Ratio *

 

7.3

x

7.3

x


* The debt-to-equity ratio is calculated by dividing the total amount of debt outstanding by the total amount of Member’s interest in the company at the end of the reporting period presented.

Return on Equity

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2016

 

2015

 

After tax income from continuing operations (1)

 

$

498

 

$

472

 

Average equity * (2)

 

$

3,639

 

$

3,704

 

Return on equity (1)/(2)

 

13.7

%

12.7

%


* Average of the ending balance of Member’s interest for the last five quarters on a continuing operations basis.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Financial Performance Summary for 2016 and 2015:

In 2016, the company delivered revenue of $1,840 million, income from continuing operations of $498 million and income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $131 million, resulting in net income of $629 million. In 2015, the company had revenue of $2,074 million, income from continuing operations of $472 million and income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $255 million, resulting in net income of $727 million. In 2016 and 2015, return on equity was 13.7 percent and 12.7 percent, respectively.

Total revenue decreased $233 million, or 11.2 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015, primarily driven by a decrease in financing revenue of $142 million, or 9.5 percent, and a decrease in operating lease revenue of $91 million, or 15.8 percent. The decrease in financing revenue was primarily due to a decline in average assets and a decline in yields from these investments. The decrease in operating lease revenue was mainly due to a decline in originations during 2016.

From a segment perspective, Client Financing revenue of $1,455 million in 2016 declined 15.1 percent as compared to $1,714 million in 2015. The decline in revenue was driven by a decrease in average assets, as well as a decline in yields for both capital leases and loans. Commercial Financing revenue of $385 million in 2016 increased 7.3 percent as compared to $359 million in 2015. The increase in revenue in 2016 was driven by an increase in average assets, partially offset by a decline in yields.

From a geographic perspective, revenue declined in 2016 in the Americas and EMEA, partially offset by growth in Asia Pacific. Americas revenue of $1,010 million in 2016 declined 17.6 percent as compared to 2015, primarily due to a decline in revenue from operating leases in the U.S. and yields in Brazil. EMEA revenue of $488 million in 2016 declined 4.5 percent as compared to 2015. Asia Pacific revenue of $343 million grew 1.7 percent in 2016 as compared to 2015.

Net margin in 2016 was $1,170 million as compared to $1,229 million in 2015. In 2016, net margin decreased $60 million or 4.9 percent, as compared to 2015. The decline in 2016 was driven by the decreases in revenue noted above, partially offset by a decrease in financing cost and depreciation expense. The decrease in financing cost in 2016 was primarily due to declining interest rates partially offset by an increase in average borrowings as compared to 2015. Depreciation expense decreased $71 million or 18.9 percent in 2016 as compared to 2015. The decrease in depreciation expense in 2016  was due to the decline in the average net investment in operating leases in the current year as compared to the prior year. Net margin percentage of 63.6 percent in 2016 increased by 4.3 points compared to the prior year.

Total expense and other (income) was $450 million in 2016 as compared to $446 million in 2015. Total expense and other (income) increased $4 million, or 0.9 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015, primarily due to an increase in SG&A, partially offset by a decrease in provisions for credit losses.

Pre-tax income from continuing operations of $719 million in 2016 decreased 8.1 percent in 2016 as compared to 2015. The decrease in pre-tax income in 2016 was primarily driven by the decline in revenue, partially offset by a decrease in financing cost and depreciation expense. Pre-tax income from continuing operations margin percentage of 39.1 percent in 2016 and 37.8 percent in 2015 increased on a year-to-year basis by 1.3 points.

Income from continuing operations increased $25 million, or 5.4 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015. Income from continuing operations margin of 27.0 percent in 2016 increased 4.3 points as compared to 22.8 percent in 2015. The continuing operations effective tax rate was 30.8 percent in 2016 and 39.7 percent in 2015.

Net income decreased by $99 million in 2016 on a year to year basis. Net income included a net profit from discontinued operations of $131 million in 2016 and $255 million in 2015 related to the company’s divestiture of its U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business to IBM in 2016. The decrease in net income in 2016 was primarily due to a decline in net profit from discontinued operations of $124 million in 2016 as compared to 2015. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2016, return on equity increased by 0.9 points primarily driven by a lower average equity balance year to year and an increase in net income from continuing operations.

At December 31, 2016, the company continued to have the financial flexibility to support the business over the long term. Cash, cash equivalents and cash invested with IBM at December 31, 2016 were $2,222 million, an increase of $689 million from December 31, 2015. Key drivers in the balance sheet and total cash flows were:

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Total assets of $35,279 million at December 31, 2016 decreased $412 million as compared to December 31, 2015, driven primarily by:

·A decrease in financing receivables of $905 million; partially offset by

·An increase in other receivables with IBM of $403 million primarily due to an increase in excess cash invested with IBM.

Total liabilities of $31,577 million decreased $382 million as compared to December 31, 2015, driven primarily by:

·A decrease in accounts payable of $415 million, and

·A decrease in total debt of $219 million; partially offset by

·An increase in total other liabilities of $502 million.

Total Member’s interest of $3,703 million decreased $30 million from December 31, 2015, as a result of:

·Decreases from net transfers to IBM ($674 million); partially offset by

·Increases from net income ($629 million).

The company’s debt-to-equity ratio at December 31, 2016 of 7.3 to 1 remained flat with the prior year. Total Member’s interest decreased 0.8 percent, while total debt of $27,030 million decreased $219 million, or 0.8 percent.

The company generated $1,010 million in cash flow from operating activities in 2016, a decrease of $84 million as compared to the prior year, primarily driven by lower net income performance. Net cash provided by investing activities of $951 million in 2016 was $1,666 million higher as compared to net cash used in investing activities in 2015 of $715 million, primarily driven by a decline in originations year to year ($4,024 million), partially offset by lower collections from financing receivables of $1,260 million and an increase in excess cash invested with IBM of $403 million. Net cash used in financing activities was $1,641 million in 2016 as compared to $176 million in the prior year, driven primarily by higher net transfers to IBM ($791 million) and lower net debt issuances ($674 million) year to year.

Results of Continuing Operations

Segment Details

The following is an analysis of the 2016 and 2015 reportable segment results. The table below presents each reportable segment’s revenue and net margin results. Segment pre-tax income is the income from continuing operations before income taxes and excludes income from discontinued operations.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

Client Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

1,455

 

$

1,714

 

(15.1

)%

Net margin

 

887

 

991

 

(10.5

)%

Net margin percentage

 

60.9

%

57.8

%

3.2

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

564

 

$

620

 

(9.1

)%

Pre-tax margin

 

38.7

%

36.2

%

2.6

pts.

Commercial Financing

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

385

 

$

359

 

7.3

%

Net margin

 

283

 

239

 

18.6

%

Net margin percentage

 

73.5

%

66.5

%

7.0

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

155

 

$

163

 

(4.5

)%

Pre-tax margin

 

40.3

%

45.3

%

(5.0

)pts.

Total Segments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenue

 

$

1,840

 

$

2,074

 

(11.2

)%

Net margin

 

1,170

 

1,229

 

(4.9

)%

Net margin percentage

 

63.6

%

59.3

%

4.3

pts.

Pre-tax income

 

$

719

 

$

783

 

(8.1

)%

Pre-tax margin

 

39.1

%

37.8

%

1.3

pts.

Client Financing

Client Financing revenue of $1,455 million in 2016 decreased by $259 million, or 15.1 percent, as compared to 2015. The decrease in revenue was driven by financing leases and loans due to a decline in average assets and a decline in yields from these investments. An increase in revenue from financing receivables from IBM partially offset these declines. The decline in yields was mainly due to declining interest rates in 2016. Operating lease revenue declined $91 million, primarily due to a decline in the investment in operating lease equipment during the year.

Net margin decreased $104 million, or 10.5 percent, as compared to 2015. The decrease was primarily driven by the revenue decline noted above, partially offset by a decrease in depreciation of $71 million and a decrease in interest expense of $84 million. The decrease in depreciation was due to the decline in average assets during the year as noted above, and the decrease in interest expense was due to lower funding requirements in higher interest rate countries during 2016.

Pre-tax income decreased $57 million, or 9.1 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015. The decrease was primarily driven by a decline in net margin of $104 million and an increase in SG&A expense of $32 million, partially offset by a decline in the provision for credit losses of $84 million. The decline in the provision for credit losses in 2016 was primarily due to lower specific reserve requirements in China, partially offset by higher reserves in Latin America. The increase in SG&A expense in 2016 was due to an increase in functional support expenses charged by IBM. At December 31, 2016, the allowance for credit losses coverage was 1.3 percent, a decrease of 161 basis points as compared to 2015. The decrease in coverage in 2016 was primarily due to the impaired receivables and associated allowance retained by IBM due to IBM’s ongoing collection efforts. For additional information, see note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Commercial Financing

Commercial Financing revenue of $385 million in 2016 increased $26 million, or 7.3 percent, as compared to 2015. The growth in revenue was driven by an increase in average assets with Commercial Financing clients due to an expansion with OEM suppliers. The increase in revenue was partially offset by a decline in yields from these investments during the year due to competitive market conditions and lower interest rates in 2016.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Net margin increased $44 million, or 18.6 percent, as compared to 2015. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in revenue as noted above, and a decrease in interest expense. The decrease in interest expense was due to lower funding requirements in higher interest rate countries in 2016.

Pre-tax income decreased $7 million, or 4.5 percent, as compared to 2015 driven by an increase in SG&A expense of $31 million and an increase in the provision for credit losses of $23 million, partially offset by an increase in net margin of $44 million. The increase in the provision for credit losses was driven primarily by an increase in unallocated reserves resulting from an increase in Commercial Financing receivables at the end of the year and an increase in specific reserves.

Geographic Revenue

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

Revenue

 

$

1,840

 

$

2,074

 

(11.2

)%

Geographies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

1,010

 

$

1,226

 

(17.6

)%

Europe/Middle East/Africa

 

488

 

510

 

(4.5

)

Asia Pacific

 

343

 

337

 

1.7

 

Americas revenue of $1,010 million decreased $216 million, or 17.6 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015, driven by the U.S. and Brazil. The decrease in the U.S. was driven by a decline in operating leases. The decrease in Brazil was driven by a decline in yields and average assets.

EMEA revenue of $488 million decreased $23 million, or 4.5 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015, driven primarily by a decline in operating leases in Germany.

Asia Pacific revenue of $343 million increased $6 million, or 1.7 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015. The increase was driven by an increase in yields for financing leases in Japan and loan financing in Australia.

Total Expense and Other (Income)

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Yr.-to-Yr.
Percent/
Margin

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2016

 

2015

 

Change

 

Total expense and other (income)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

388

 

$

325

 

19.3

%

Provisions for credit losses

 

72

 

133

 

(46.1

)

Other (income) and expense

 

(9

)

(12

)

(23.0

)

Total expense and other (income)

 

$

450

 

$

446

 

0.9

%

Total expense-to-revenue ratio

 

24.5

%

21.5

%

3.0

pts.

Total expense and other (income) of $450 million increased $4 million, or 0.9 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015.

Total SG&A expense increased $63 million, or 19.3 percent, as compared to 2015, primarily driven by an increase in functional support expenses charged by IBM. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Provisions for credit losses decreased $61 million, or 46.1 percent, as compared to 2015, due to lower specific reserve requirements in China, partially offset by higher reserves in Latin America in the current year. For additional information on provisions for credit losses, see note E, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

2017.

Other (income) and expense decreased $3 million, or 23.0 percent, in 2016 as compared to 2015. Other (income) and expense includes higher foreign currency transaction losses of $75 million, partially offset by gains on derivative instruments of $70 million. For additional information on currency impacts and derivative instruments, see note D, “Financial Instruments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.Information

Income Taxes

The continuing operations effective tax rate for 2016 was 30.8 percent, a decrease of 8.9 points, as compared to 2015. The decline in the effective tax rate in 2016 was largely due to the establishment of certain foreign valuation allowances in 2015.

Results of Discontinued Operations

The income from discontinued operations, net of tax, of $131 million in 2016 decreased 48.6 percent as compared to 2015, due primarily to a decrease in revenue of 34.5 percent in 2016 as compared to 2015. Pre-tax income decreased 48.6 percent on a year-to-year basis due to the decline in revenue. There was no gain or loss recognized on the divestiture of the U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business to IBM in 2016. The discontinued operations effective tax rate in 2016 was 39.4 percent, which was relatively flat on a year to year basis. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Information

Liquidity and Capital Resources

IBM Credit funds its current and future obligations through the generation of cash flows from operations and its access to the short-termshort- and long-term capital markets, as well as fromthrough the support givenprovided by IBM’s overall liquidity position and access to capital markets. The debt used to fund the company’s financing assets as of December 31, 20172019 was primarily comprised of loans from IBM.

Prior to 2017, theThe company managed its debt-to-equity ratio at approximately 7 to 1. In January 2017, thegenerated $231 million in cash flows from operations in 2019. The company increased its debt payable tohad balances of $1,687 million of cash and cash equivalents and $509 million in cash invested with IBM and made distributions to IBM, which resulted in an increase in the debt-to-equity ratio to approximately 9 to 1.

In July 2017, IBM and the company (the Borrowers) entered into a $2.5 billion 364-Day Credit Agreement, and a $2.5 billion Three-Year Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreements). The Credit Agreements permit the Borrowers to borrow up to an aggregate of $5 billion on a revolving basis. Neither Borrower is a guarantor or co-obligor of the other Borrower under the Credit Agreements. Subject to certain conditions stated in the Credit Agreements, the Borrowers may borrow, prepay and re-borrow amounts under the Credit Agreements at any time during the term of the Credit Agreements. Funds borrowed may be used for the general corporate purposes of the Borrowers. Interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Agreements will be based on prevailing market interest rates, as further described in the Credit Agreements. The Credit Agreements contain customary representations and warranties, covenants, events of default, and indemnification provisions. As of December 31, 2017, there were no borrowings under the Credit Agreements. The company incurred charges relating2019. Refer to the Credit Agreements of $1.9 million in 2017 which are recorded in financing costs in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

In August 2017, IBM Credit established a commercial paper program under which the company is permitted to issue unsecured commercial paper notes from time to time, up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any one time of $5 billion. The proceeds of the commercial paper may be usedcompany’s cash flow and liquidity trends on page 33 for general corporate purposes, including, among other items, the repayment of indebtedness and other short-term liquidity needs. The maturity of the commercial paper notes issued may vary but may not exceed 364 days from the date of issuance. The notes are sold under customary terms in the commercial paper marketplace, and can be issued either at a discount from par, or at par, and bear interest rates as agreed upon under the terms and conditions of the agreements between the company and each commercial paper dealer. At December 31, 2017, there was $1,496 million in commercial paper outstanding.

In August 2017, the company filed a shelf registration statement with the SEC allowing it to offer for sale public debt securities. In September 2017, the company issued fixed and floating rate debt securities in the aggregate amount of $3,000 million. For additional information of the company’s debt securities, see note G, “Borrowing,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

information.

The consolidated tangible net worth of the company was $3,423$2,577 million and $3,580$3,286 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, with consolidated tangible net worth calculated as total assets of IBM Credit and its consolidated subsidiaries less the intangible assets and total liabilities of IBM Credit and its consolidated subsidiaries.

During 2017, IBM CreditIn 2019 the company made totalcash distributions to IBM of $531$1,231 million, includingwhich was partially offset by a return of profit, and received contributions from IBM of $121 million, while maintaining a debt-to-equity ratio of approximately 9 to 1. Included in the $531 million in cash distributions to IBM during 2017 is $94 million distributed in the first quarter of 2017 priornon-cash contribution to the company converting to the consolidated basis of reporting and is recorded in net transfers to IBM in the Consolidated Statementamount of Cash Flows and Consolidated Statement of Member’s Interest.$64 million from IBM. The future amount of third-party debt and contributions from and distributions to IBM may vary as the company continues to manage leverage to the targeted debt-to-equity ratio of 9 to 1. The company’s actual debt-to-equity ratio may vary based on several factors, including differences between management’s expectations and actual results of operations.

The company's debt-to-equity ratio was 9.0 to 1 and 8.9 to 1 for the period ending at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Refer to the company’s debt-to-equity ratio on page 34 for additional information.

On July 18, 2019, the company entered into a new $2.5 billion 364-day Credit Agreement to replace its existing $2.5 billion 364-day Credit Agreement, and extended the maturity date of its existing $2.5 billion Three-Year Credit Agreement to July 20, 2022 (together, the Credit Agreements). The size of each facility was unchanged. As of December 31, 2019, the company had no borrowings outstanding against these Credit Agreements.

The company’s Credit Agreements each contain significant debt covenants, which obligate the company to promptly pay principal and interest, limit the aggregate amount of secured indebtedness and sale and leaseback transactions to 10 percent of IBM’s consolidated net tangible assets, and restrict the ability of the company or IBM to merge or consolidate with a third party, unless certain conditions are met. The Credit Agreements also include several financial covenants, including that (i) IBM will not permit the consolidated net interest expense ratio, for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters taken as a single accounting period, to be less than 2.20 to 1.0; (ii) the company will not permit its tangible net worth to be less than $50 million as of the end of the fiscal year and (ii)(iii) the company’s leverage ratio cannot be greater than 11 to 1 as of the last day of eachthe fiscal quarter. The Credit Agreements each contain a cross default provision with respect to other defaulted indebtedness of at least $500 million. The company’s indenture governing its debt securities contains significant covenants which obligate the company to promptly pay principal and interest, limit the aggregate amount of liens (other than permitted liens) to 15 percent of the company’s consolidated net tangible assets, and restrict the company’s ability to merge or consolidate unless certain conditions are met.

The company is in compliance with all of its significant debt covenants and is obligated to provide periodic certifications to its lenders. The failure to comply with its debt covenants could constitute an event of default. If certain events of default were to occur, the principal and interest on the debt to which any event of default applied would become immediately due and payable. The Borrowers are also restricted from amending, modifying or terminating the Support

31

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Agreement in any manner materially adverse to the lenders. For additional information on the Support Agreement, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions”,Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In 2017, the company established a commercial paper program under which the company is permitted to issue unsecured commercial paper notes from time to time, up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any one time of $5 billion. As of December 31, 2019, the company had $304 million of commercial paper outstanding.

The company has a shelf registration statement with the SEC allowing it to offer for sale public debt securities. The company issued $3 billion and $4 billion of debt securities in 2017 and 2018, respectively, at both fixed and floating rates. There were no issuances of debt securities in 2019. For additional information on the company’s debt securities, see note H, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The major rating agencies’ ratings on the company’s debt securities at December 31, 2019 appear in the table below.

STANDARD

MOODY’S

AND

INVESTORS

POOR’S

SERVICE

Long-term debt

A

A2

Commercial paper

A-1

Prime-1

After closing the Red Hat acquisition, Moody’s, as expected, downgraded IBM and IBM Credit LLC’s long-term debt rating from A1 to A2 and improved its outlook to stable. IBM and IBM Credit LLC remain committed to a target leverage profile consistent with a mid to high single A credit rating within a couple of years.

IBM Credit will continue with a disciplined financial policy and is acommitted to maintaining strong investment grade company with significant financial flexibility to execute its strategy.

credit ratings. The company does not have “ratings trigger” provisions in its debt covenants or documentation, which would allow the holders to declare an event of default and seek to accelerate payments thereunder in the event of a change in credit rating.

STANDARD

MOODY’S

AND

INVESTORS

FITCH

POOR’S

SERVICE

RATINGS

Long-term debt

A+

A1

A+

Commercial paper

A-1

Prime-1

F1

In July 2017, the UK's Financial Conduct Authority, which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), announced that it intends to phase out LIBOR by the end of 2021. Various central bank committees and working groups continue to discuss replacement of benchmark rates, the process for amending existing LIBOR-based contracts, and the potential economic impacts of different alternatives. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) as its preferred alternative rate for USD LIBOR. SOFR is a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight, collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities, and is based on directly observable U.S. Treasury-backed repurchase transactions. The use of LIBOR is primarily within the company's Commercial Financing segment where agreements are short term in nature and generally range from 30 to 90 days. The company is evaluating the potential impact of the replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate, including risk management, internal operational readiness and monitoring the FASB standard-setting process to address financial reporting issues that might arise in connection with transition from LIBOR to a new benchmark rate.

In the normal course of business, the company may be exposed to the impact of foreign currency fluctuations and interest rate changes. Although the company seeks to substantially match fundmatch-fund the term, currency and interest rate variability of its debt against its underlying financing assets, risks may arise from a mismatch between assets and the related liabilities used for funding. The company also employs a rigorous process to optimize portfolio risk management. Portfolio risks include credit and residual value risk. For additional information on the management of these risks by the company, see note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” and note D, “Financial Instruments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the section entitled “Portfolio Risk Management” in Item 1, “Business,” and Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosureDisclosures About Market Risks”.Risk.”

32

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Cash Flow and Liquidity Trends

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the years ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2014

 

Net cash provided by operating activities 1

 

$

1,034

 

$

1,010

 

$

1,094

 

$

1,001

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

2,680

 

1,772

 

1,487

 

1,301

 

Cash invested with IBM, available on-demand 2

 

911

 

450

 

46

 

105

 

Committed credit facilities 3

 

$

5,000

 

$

N/A

 

$

N/A

 

$

N/A

 

(Dollars in millions)

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

2017

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

231

$

1,099

$

1,034

Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities

7,312

(1,903)

(1,482)

Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities

(7,679)

(30)

1,308

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

2017

Cash and cash equivalents

$

1,687

$

1,828

$

2,680

Cash invested with IBM, available on-demand (1)

 

509

 

2,014

 

911

Committed credit facilities (2)

5,000

5,000

5,000


(1)Excess cash is periodically invested in interest bearing, on-demand accounts with IBM and is presented as other receivables from IBM in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)The Credit Agreements were entered into and/or amended on July 18, 2019.

(1) Net cash provided by discontinued operations includes $120 million, $273 million and $210 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. 

(2) Excess cash is periodically invested in interest bearing, on-demand accounts with IBM and is presented as other receivables from IBM in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3) The $2.5 billion 364-Day Credit Agreement and $2.5 billion Three-Year Credit Agreement were entered into on July 20, 2017.

N/A - Not Applicable

Net cash provided by operating activities in 2017 increased $252019 decreased $868 million as compared to 2016,2018, driven primarily by the following factors:

·                  A decrease in interesthigher net cash payments on debt of $32 million,to IBM related to outstanding accounts payable and

·                  A decrease in higher net cash income tax payments of $25 million, and

·                  A decrease in selling, general, and administrative expenditures; partially offset by

·                  A decrease in cash provided from discontinued operations.

Net cash used in investing activities in 2017 increased $2,433 million as compared to 2016 driven by:

·                  Lower collections of financing receivables of $1,187 million, and

·                  Increases in financing receivable originations of $1,028 million, and

·                  Higher cash used in short-term financing receivables of $468 million, driven by increased Commercial Financing originations year to year; partially offset by

·                  Lower net investment in operating leases of $123 million, and

·                  Prior year proceeds from the divestiture of the U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business of $121 million.

payments.

Net cash provided by financinginvesting activities in 2017 increased $2,9492019 was a source of cash of $7,312 million as compared to 2016a use of cash of $1,903 million in 2018, driven by:

Lower net originations of short-term financing receivables of $6,674 million, reflecting the Commercial Financing portfolio actions. For further information see note F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM;” and
Other receivables with IBM in 2019 was a source of cash of $1,506 million as compared to use of cash of $1,200 million in 2018, driven by lower levels of excess cash invested with IBM in 2019.

·                  An increase in cash provided from net debt issuances to third parties of $5,294 million, driven by long-term debt securities issuances of $3,000 million in the third quarter of 2017 and commercial paper issuances of $1,496 million in the fourth quarter of 2017, and

·                  LowerNet cash used in net equity transactionsfinancing activities in 2019 increased $7,649 million as compared to 2018, driven by:

An increase in net payments on total debt of $6,970 million, driven by lower funding requirements associated with financing receivables, and
An increase in net cash distributions to IBM of $679 million, which reflects the company's objective of achieving a target debt-to-equity ratio of 9 to 1.

Debt

(Dollars in millions)

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

Short-term debt

 

  

 

  

Debt

$

633

$

3,035

Debt payable to IBM

 

8,194

 

10,223

Total short-term debt

$

8,827

$

13,258

Long-term debt

 

  

 

  

Debt

$

6,517

$

7,919

Debt payable to IBM

 

8,751

 

9,357

Total long-term debt

$

15,268

$

17,276

Total debt

$

24,095

$

30,534

33

Table of $456 million; partially offset byContents

·                  An increase in net cash payments to retire debt with IBM of $2,426 million, and

·                  An increase in principal payments on third party long-term debt of $375 million.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Debt

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Short-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

Debt

 

$

1,568

 

$

44

 

Debt payable to IBM

 

15,159

 

16,481

 

Total short-term debt

 

$

16,727

 

$

16,525

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

 

 

Debt

 

$

4,211

 

$

681

 

Debt payable to IBM

 

9,539

 

9,824

 

Total long-term debt

 

$

13,750

 

$

10,505

 

Total debt

 

$

30,477

 

$

27,030

 

Total debt was $30,477 million and $27,030 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total debt payable to IBM was $24,698 million and $26,306 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Total debt increased $3,447 million at year-end 2017 from year-end 2016 primarily in support of the increase in total assets of $4,237 million at year-end 2017 compared to year-end 2016 and the company’s targeted debt-to-equity ratio of 9 to 1.

The company utilizes certain of its financing receivables as collateral for non-recourse borrowings. Financing receivables pledged as collateral for these borrowings was $773 million in 2017 and $689 million in 2016.

For additional information on the company’s debt and debt payable to IBM, see note G, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The company’s interest rate and foreign currency rate risk management policies and procedures are discussed in Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk,” note A, “Significant Accounting Policies” and note D, “Financial Instruments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest on Debt

The company recognized interest expense of $362 million and $364 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively, of which $265 million and $301 million was interest expense on debt payable to IBM in 2017 and 2016, respectively. For additional information on interest expense, see note G, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Pre-swap annual contractual maturities of long-term debt and long-term debt payable to IBM outstanding at December 31, 2017, were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2023 and

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

Beyond

 

Total

 

Long-term debt

 

$

610

 

$

1,873

 

$

120

 

$

1,143

 

$

502

 

$

0

 

$

4,248

 

Debt payable to IBM

 

4,614

 

2,284

 

1,861

 

614

 

160

 

6

 

9,539

 

Total

 

$

5,224

 

$

4,157

 

$

1,981

 

$

1,757

 

$

661

 

$

6

 

$

13,786

 

Debt-to-Equity

The debt-to-equity ratio, as reported in the table below, is, at any given time, the ratio of total debt to total Member’s interest.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Debt-to-equity ratio

 

8.6

x

7.3

x

Total debt changes generally correspond with the level of Client Financing and Commercial Financing receivables, the level of cash and cash equivalents, the change in payables to IBM and external parties and the change in net investment from IBM.

Total debt was $24,095 million and $30,534 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Total debt payable to IBM was $16,945 million, a decrease of $2,635 million as compared to December 31, 2018. Total third-party debt was $7,150 million, a decrease of $3,804 million from December 31, 2018. The decrease in total debt during the year of 2019 was primarily due to lower funding requirements associated with financing receivables.

The company utilizes certain of its financing receivables as collateral for non-recourse borrowings. Financing receivables pledged as collateral for these borrowings were $1,062 million in 2019 and $710 million in 2018.

For additional information on the company’s debt and debt payable to IBM, see note H, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

The company’s interest rate and foreign currency rate risk management policies and procedures are discussed in Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” as well as note A, “Significant Accounting Policies” and note D, “Financial Instruments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Interest on Debt

The company recognized interest expense of $499 million and $503 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively, of which $242 million and $298 million was interest expense on debt payable to IBM in 2019 and 2018, respectively. For additional information on interest expense, see note H, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Pre-swap annual contractual obligations of long-term debt and long-term debt payable to IBM outstanding at December 31, 2019, are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

2025 and

At December 31:

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

    

2023

    

2024

    

Beyond

    

Total

Long-term debt

$

1,986

$

3,151

$

591

$

764

$

2

$

0

$

6,495

Debt payable to IBM

 

3,961

2,484

1,362

679

200

65

8,751

Total

$

5,947

$

5,635

$

1,953

$

1,443

$

202

$

65

$

15,246

Debt-to-Equity

The debt-to-equity ratio, as reported in the table below, is, at any given time, the ratio of total debt to total Member’s interest.

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

 

Debt-to-equity ratio

 

9.0

x

8.9

x

The debt-to-equity ratio is calculated by dividing the total amount of debt outstanding by the total amount of member’s interest in the company at the end of the reporting period presented.

The company’s debt-to-equity ratio was 8.69.0 to 1 at December 31, 2017, which increased2019 as compared to the debt-to-equity ratio of 7.38.9 to 1 at year-end 2016.2018. Total Member’s interest of $3,562$2,686 million declined by $141$735 million, or 3.821.5 percent, whileand total debt of $30,477$24,095 million increased $3,447decreased $6,439 million, or 12.821.1 percent. The company revised its targeted debt-to-equity ratio in 2017 to 9 to 1 as compared to its target of 7 to 1 in 2016. The targeted debt-to-equity ratio may vary based on several factors, including differences between management’s expectations and actual results of operations. The debt-to-equity ratio was below target at year-end 2017 as a result

34

Table of the one-time benefit to net income from the enactmentContents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of U.S. tax reform.Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Contractual Obligations

(Dollars in millions)

Total Contractual

Payments Due In

At December 31, 2019:

    

Payment Stream

    

2020

    

2021-22

    

2023-24

    

After 2024

Long-term debt obligations

$

15,246

$

5,947

$

7,589

$

1,645

$

65

Interest on long-term debt obligations

632

287

293

51

1

Total

$

15,878

$

6,234

$

7,882

$

1,696

$

66

 

 

 

 

Payments Due In

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Total Contractual

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2017:

 

Payment Stream

 

2018

 

2019-20

 

2021-22

 

After 2022

 

Long-term debt obligations

 

$

13,786

 

$

5,224

 

$

6,138

 

$

2,418

 

$

6

 

Interest on long-term debt obligations

 

561

 

199

 

303

 

60

 

0

 

Total

 

$

14,347

 

$

5,423

 

$

6,442

 

$

2,478

 

$

6

 

Total contractual obligations, as reported in the table above, reflect the principal carrying value forof the company’s long-term debt and discounted value for the debt interest payments. Interest on floating-rate debt obligations is calculated using the effective interest rate at December 31, 2017,2019, plus the interest rate spread associated with that debt, if any.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

From time to time, the company may enter into off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by SEC Financial Reporting Release 67, “Disclosure in Management’s Discussion and Analysis about Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations.”

At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the company had no such off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material current or future effect on the company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. See the previous table for the company’s contractual obligations, and note J,K, “Contingencies and Commitments,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about the company’s guarantees, financial commitments and indemnification arrangements. The company does not have retained interests in assets transferred to unconsolidated entities or other material off-balance sheet interests or instruments.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The application of GAAPaccounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (GAAP) requires the company to make estimates and assumptions about certain items and future events that directly affect its reported financial condition. The accounting estimates and assumptions discussed in this section are those that the company considers to be the most critical to its financial statements. An accounting estimate is considered critical if both (a) the nature of the estimate or assumption is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment involved, and (b) the impact within a reasonable range of outcomes of the estimate and assumption is material to the company’s financial condition. The company’s significant accounting policies are described in note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

A quantitative sensitivity analysis is provided where that information is reasonably available, can be reliably estimated and provides material information to investors. The amounts used to assess sensitivity (e.g., 1 percent, 10 percent, etc.) are included to allow users of this report to understand a general direction of cause and effect of changes in the estimates and do not represent management’s predictions of variability. For all of these estimates, it should be noted that future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted, and estimates require regular review and adjustment.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Credit Losses

The company reviews its financing receivables portfolio on a regular basis in order to assess collectabilitycollectibility and records adjustments to the allowance for credit losses at least quarterly. A description of the methods used by management to estimate the amount of uncollectible receivables is included in note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Factors that could result in actual receivable losses that are materially different from the estimated reserve include significant changes in the economy or a sudden change in the economic health of a significant client in the company’s financing and operating lease receivables portfolio.

35

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

At December 31, 2017,2019, to the extent that actual collectabilitycollectibility differs from management’s estimates currently provided for by 10 percent, the company’s pre-tax income would be higher or lower by an estimated $21$16 million, depending upon whether the actual collectabilitycollectibility was better or worse, respectively, than the estimates.

Determination of Residual Value

Residual value represents the estimated fair value of equipment under lease as of the end of the lease. Residual value estimates can impact the determination of whether a lease is classified as sales-type, direct financing or operating. The company estimates the future fair value of leased equipment by using historical models, analyzing the current market for new and used equipment, and obtaining forward-looking product information such as marketing plans and technological innovations. Residual value estimates are periodically reviewed and “other than temporary” declines in estimated future residual values are recognized upon identification.

Factors that could cause actual results to materially differ from the estimates include significant changes in the used-equipment market brought on by unforeseen changes in technology innovations and any resulting changes in the useful lives of used equipment.

To the extent that actual residual value recovery is lower than management’s estimates by 10 percent, the company’s pre-tax income for December 31, 2017,2019 would have been lower by an estimated $61$62 million.

Income Taxes

The company is subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions. Significant judgments are required in determining the consolidated provision for income taxes. During the ordinary course of business, there are many transactions and calculations for which the ultimate tax determination is uncertain.

For the company’s U.S. federal and certain state and foreign operations included in various IBM consolidated tax returns and(and therefore not directly subject to corporate income taxes,taxes), IBM makes payments to tax authorities on the company’s behalf. In such cases, IBM and the company maintain a Tax Sharing Agreement for any operations included in an IBM consolidated tax return, pursuant to which IBM charges the company for any taxes owed and reimburses the company for tax attributes generated. Such charges or reimbursements are based upon a calculation of the company’s relevant pro forma stand-alone tax return in which the company records the initial income tax benefits associated with an uncertain tax position using its best estimate at the time the position originates and makes a final settlement of the position with IBM for the recorded amounts. Consequently, any recognition and subsequent changes in assessment about the sustainability of tax positions, including valuation allowances and interest and penalties, are the responsibility of IBM. Because the company bears no risk associated with the sustainability of uncertain tax positions, no uncertain tax liabilities are recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements for entities that file as part of IBM’s consolidated tax filings.

For separate income tax return filings for jurisdictions that are not included in IBM’san IBM consolidated tax return, the company recognizes tax liabilities based on estimates of whether additional taxes and interest will be due. These tax liabilities are recognized when, despite the company’s belief that its tax return positions are supportable, the company believes that certain positions may not be fully sustained upon review by tax authorities. The company believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate for all open audit years based on its assessment of many factors, including past experience and interpretations of tax law. This assessment relies on estimates and assumptions, and may involve a series of complex judgments about future events. To the extent that new information becomes available whichthat causes the company to change its judgment regarding the adequacy of existing tax liabilities, such changes to tax liabilities will impact income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

Significant judgment is also required in determining any valuation allowance recorded against deferred tax assets for separate income tax return filing jurisdictions. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considers all available evidence for each jurisdiction, including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income and the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies. In the event that the company changes its determination as to the amount

36

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

of deferred tax assets that can be realized, the company will adjust its valuation allowance with a corresponding impact to income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made.

The consolidated provision for income taxes will change period to period based on nonrecurring events, such as the settlement of income tax audits and changes in tax laws, as well as recurring factors, including the geographic mix of income before taxes, the timing and amount of foreign dividend repatriation, state and local taxes and the effects of various global income tax strategies. To the extent that the provision for income taxes increases/decreasesincreased/decreased by 1 percent of income from continuing operations before income taxes, consolidated net income would have decreased/improved by $7.5$6.2 million in 2017.2019.

Cybersecurity

While cybersecurity risk can never be completely eliminated, the company’s approach draws on the depth and breadth of IBM’s global capabilities in security services and its internal approaches to risk management.

From an enterprise perspective, IBM implements a multi-faceted risk-management approach to identify and address cybersecurity risks. IBM has established policies and procedures that provide the foundation upon which IBM Credit’s infrastructure and data are managed. IBM Credit performs ongoing assessments regarding its technical controls and adheres to IBM’s established methods for identifying emerging risks related to cybersecurity. IBM uses a layered approach with overlapping controls to defend against cybersecurity attacks and threats on networks, end-user devices, servers, applications and cloud solutions. TheThrough IBM, the company also through IBM has a global incident response process to respond to cybersecurity threats. In addition, through IBM, the company through IBM utilizes a combination of online training, educational tools, social media, and other awareness initiatives to foster a culture of security awareness and responsibility among its workforce.

Employees and Related Workforce

At December 31, 2017, IBM Credit and its subsidiary companies employed approximately 2,400 people globally.

Looking Forward

In 2017, IGF’s legal entity structure was reorganized globally to consolidate Client Financing and Commercial Financing under IBM Credit which drives operational benefits. The company has access to the short-term and long-term debt markets as an issuer in the capital markets and as a borrower from IBM. In 2017, the company issued third-party debt and made distributions to IBM, including a return of profit. The company will continue to target a debt-to-equity ratio of 9 to 1, which may vary based on several factors, including differences between management’s expectations and actual results of operations. The future amount of third-party debt and contributions from and distributions to IBM may vary as the company continues to manage its leverage to the targeted debt-to-equity ratio. Absent other funding alternatives, a protracted period where the company or IBM could not access the capital markets would likely lead to a slowdown in originations. Financing originations, which determine the asset base of the annuity-like business, are also dependent upon the demand for IT products and services as well as client participation rates.

The company’s financial position provides flexibility and funding capacity which enables the company to be well positioned in the current environment. TheAs a captive finance company, the company’s financing assets and new originations result primarily from the financing of IBM and OEM IT products and services toservices. Substantially all of the company’s and IBM’s clients. Substantially all financing assets are IT related assetsIT-related, which provide a stable base of business for future growth.business. The company’s financing offerings are competitive and available to clients as a result of factors including the company’s borrowing cost, financing incentive programs and access to the capital markets.

Beginning in the second quarter of 2019 and continuing throughout the year, the company wound down the portion of its Commercial Financing operations that provides short-term working capital solutions for OEM IT suppliers, distributors and resellers. The company had receivables of $0.6 billion and $8.5 billion relating to its OEM IT Commercial Financing operations for the periods ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. IBM Credit will continue to provide differentiated end-to-end financing solutions, including commercial financing in support of IBM partner relationships.

IBM Credit has policies in place designed to manage the risks involved in financing, including credit losses, residual values, liquidity, currency and interest rates.

The economy could impact the credit quality of the company’s receivables portfolio and therefore the level of provision for credit losses. IBM Creditcompany will continue to apply rigorous credit policies in both the origination of new business and the evaluation of the existing portfolio and will take risk mitigation actions when necessary.

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

The company has historically been able to manage residual value risk both through insight into IBM’s

37

Table of Contents

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – (continued)

product cycles and monitoring of OEM IT product announcements.

Interest rates and the overall economy (including currency fluctuations) will have an effect on both revenue and net margin. Interest rates directly impact the company by increasing or decreasing financing revenue and associated borrowing costs. The company’s interest rate risk management policy, combined with its pricing strategy, should mitigate margin erosion due to changes in interest rates.

 

The company’s geographically diverse client base, product and client knowledge, and strategy to substantially match fundmatch-fund the term, currency and interest rate variability of its debt to the underlying financing assets should enable prudent management of the business going forward, even during periods of uncertainty with respect to the global economy.

38

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosureDisclosures About Market Risk.

The company operates in multiple currencies and is a lender and issuer in the capital markets and a borrower from IBM. In the normal course of business, the company may be exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations. The company limits its exposure to core market risks by following established risk management policies and procedures and through the use of match fundingmatch-funding from IBM and third parties. Although the company seeks to substantially match fundmatch-fund the term,terms, currency and interest rate variability of its debt against its underlying financing asset,assets, risks may arise from a mismatch between assets and the related liabilities used for funding. The company may also choose to mitigate any remaining exposure relating to interest rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations through the use of interest rate or foreign currency derivatives.

In addition, the company performs a sensitivity analysis to determine the effects that market risk exposure may have on the fair values of the company’s debt and other financial instruments.

The financial instruments that are included in the sensitivity analysis are comprised of the company’s cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, short-term and long-term loans, installment payment receivables, participated interests in IBM financing receivables, Commercial Financing receivables, and purchased interestsinterest in certain of IBM’s trade and other receivables, investments, long-termshort- and short-termlong-term debt and derivative financial instruments. The company’s derivative financial instruments generally include interest rate swaps and foreign exchange forward contracts.

To perform the sensitivity analysis, the company assesses the risk of loss in the fair values from the effect of hypothetical changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates onin the fair values of market-sensitive instruments. The market values for interest and foreign currency exchange rate risk are computed based on the present value of future cash flows as affected by the changes in rates that are attributable to the market risk being measured. The discount rates used for the present value computations were selected based on market interest and foreign currency exchange rates in effect at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018. The differences in this comparison are the hypothetical gains or losses associated with each type of risk.

Information provided by the sensitivity analysis does not necessarily represent the actual changes in fair value that the company would incur under normal market conditions because, due to practical limitations, all variables other than the specific market risk factor are held constant.

The results of the sensitivity analysis at December 31, 2017and 20162019 and 2018, are as follows:

Interest Rate Risk

At December 31, 2017,2019, a 10 percent increase or decrease in the levels of interest rates with all other variables held constant would result in an increase in the fair value of the company’s financial instruments of $22 million as compared to a decrease of $36 million at December 31, 2016. Conversely, at December 31, 2017, a 10 percent increase in the levels of interest rates with all other variables held constant would result in aor decrease in the fair value of the company’s financial instruments of $22$6 million as compared to an increase or decrease of $34$9 million at December 31, 2016.2018. Changes in the relative sensitivity of the fair value of the company’s financial instruments portfolio for these theoretical changes in the level of interest rates are primarily driven by differences between maturities and interest rate profile of assets as compared to liabilities.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk – (continued)

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

At December 31, 2017,2019, a 10 percent weaker or stronger U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, with all other variables held constant, would result in an increase in the fair value of the company’s financial instruments of $174 million as compared to a decrease of $249 million at December 31, 2016. Conversely, at December 31, 2017, a 10 percent stronger U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, with all other variables held constant, would result in aor decrease in the fair value of the company’s financial instruments of $174$377 million as compared to an increaseincrease/decrease of $249$391 million at December 31, 2016.2018.

Financing Risks

See Item 1, “Business” for a discussion of the financing risks associated with the clientClient Financing and commercial financingCommercial Financing business and management’s actions to mitigate such risks.

39

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplemental Data.

(a)   Audited consolidated financial statements of IBM Credit and its subsidiary companiessubsidiaries for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015.2017.

(b)   See the Exhibit Index on the page immediately preceding the exhibits for a list of exhibits filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K Annual Report.10-K.

40

41

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Managers and the Member of IBM Credit LLC

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statement of Financial Positionfinancial position of IBM Credit LLC and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the related Consolidated Statementsconsolidated statements of Earnings, Comprehensive Income, Changesearnings, of comprehensive income, of changes in Member’s Interestmember's interest and Cash Flowsof cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2019, including the related notes and financial statement schedule listed in the accompanying index (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172019 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”)(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the auditaudits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

New York, New York

March 1, 2018February 28, 2020

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.

42

IBM CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS

(Dollars in millions)

    

For the year ended December 31:

    

Notes

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Revenue

  

 

  

 

  

Financing revenue

C

$

1,323

$

1,446

$

1,322

Operating lease revenue

277

333

380

Total revenue

N

$

1,600

$

1,779

$

1,702

Financing cost (related party cost of $242 in 2019, $298 in 2018 and $265 in 2017)

C,H

$

526

$

503

$

362

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease

160

193

231

Net margin

$

913

$

1,083

$

1,109

Expense and other (income)

Selling, general and administrative

$

372

$

375

$

378

Provision for/(benefit from) credit losses

(5)

9

15

Other (income) and expense

(72)

(31)

(39)

Total expense and other (income)

C

$

295

$

352

$

354

Income before income taxes

$

619

$

731

$

755

Provision for income taxes

C,L

188

133

5

Net income

$

430

$

597

$

750

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

Notes

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Revenue

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing revenue

 

C

 

$

1,322

 

$

1,356

 

$

1,499

 

Operating lease revenue

 

 

 

380

 

484

 

575

 

Total revenue

 

M

 

$

1,702

 

$

1,840

 

$

2,074

 

Financing cost (related party cost of $265 in 2017, $301 in 2016 and $425 in 2015)

 

C,G

 

$

362

 

$

364

 

$

466

 

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease

 

 

 

231

 

307

 

378

 

Net margin

 

 

 

$

1,109

 

$

1,170

 

$

1,229

 

Expense and other (income)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Selling, general and administrative

 

 

 

$

378

 

$

388

 

$

325

 

Provision for credit losses

 

 

 

15

 

72

 

133

 

Other (income) and expense

 

 

 

(39

)

(9

)

(12

)

Total expense and other (income)

 

C

 

$

354

 

$

450

 

$

446

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

 

 

$

755

 

$

719

 

$

783

 

Provision for income taxes

 

C,K

 

5

 

222

 

311

 

Income from continuing operations

 

 

 

$

750

 

$

498

 

$

472

 

Income from discontinued operations - net of tax

 

N

 

 

131

 

255

 

Net income

 

 

 

$

750

 

$

629

 

$

727

 

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 5249 through 8483 are an integral part of the financial statements.

43

IBM CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Dollars in millions)

For the year ended December 31:

    

Notes

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Net income

$

430

$

597

$

750

Other comprehensive income/(loss), before tax:

Foreign currency translation

J

14

(151)

363

Retirement-related benefit plans (1)

J,M

(12)

(4)

3

Other comprehensive income/(loss), before tax

J

1

(155)

366

Income tax (expense)/benefit related to items of other comprehensive income

J

1

(31)

2

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

J

$

2

$

(186)

$

367

Total comprehensive income

$

432

$

411

$

1,117

(1)Amounts represented relate to multiple-employer plans.

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 49 through 83 are an integral part of the financial statements.

44

IBM CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

Notes

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Net income

 

 

 

$

750

 

$

629

 

$

727

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss) - net of tax:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation

 

 

 

365

 

16

 

(158

)

Retirement-related benefit plans 1

 

L

 

2

 

(1

)

0

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss) - net of tax:

 

 

 

$

367

 

$

15

 

$

(158

)

Total comprehensive income

 

 

 

$

1,117

 

$

644

 

$

569

 

(Dollars in millions)

At December 31:

    

Notes

    

2019

    

2018

Assets:

 

  

  

Cash and cash equivalents

D

$

1,687

$

1,828

Financing receivables

F

 

17,365

 

25,848

(net of allowances of $148 in 2019 and $174 in 2018)

Equipment under operating leases

212

386

(net of accumulated depreciation of $238 in 2019 and $283 in 2018)

Financing receivables from IBM

C,F

 

3,870

 

3,609

Receivables purchased/participated from IBM

C,F

 

4,359

 

5,433

(net of allowances of $8 in 2019 and $18 in 2018)

Other receivables from IBM

C

513

2,019

Other assets

G

 

406

 

373

Total assets

$

28,412

$

39,497

Liabilities and member's interest:

Accounts payable

$

434

$

1,705

Accounts payable to IBM

C

336

3,044

Debt

H

 

7,150

 

10,954

Debt payable to IBM

C,H

 

16,945

 

19,580

Taxes

L

 

637

 

547

Other liabilities

I

 

224

 

246

Total liabilities

$

25,726

$

36,076

Contingencies and commitments

K

Member’s interest:

 

Member's interest

2,601

3,216

Retained earnings

116

238

Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

(31)

(33)

Total member's interest

$

2,686

$

3,420

Total liabilities and member’s interest

$

28,412

$

39,497


(1) Amounts represented relate to multiple-employer plans.

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 5249 through 8483 are an integral part of the financial statements.

45

IBM CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITIONCASH FLOWS

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

Notes

 

2017

 

2016

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

D

 

$

2,680

 

$

1,772

 

Financing receivables

 

E

 

26,066

 

24,681

 

(net of allowances of $173 in 2017 and $242 in 2016)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equipment under operating leases

 

 

 

401

 

506

 

(net of accumulated depreciation of $288 in 2017 and $499 in 2016)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Financing receivables from IBM

 

C,E

 

3,743

 

3,513

 

Receivables purchased/participated from IBM

 

C,E

 

5,239

 

3,897

 

(net of allowances of $39 in 2017 and $35 in 2016)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other receivables from IBM

 

C

 

1,024

 

482

 

Other assets

 

F

 

364

 

428

 

Total assets

 

 

 

$

39,516

 

$

35,279

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities and Member’s interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accounts payable

 

 

 

$

1,776

 

$

1,522

 

Accounts payable to IBM

 

C

 

2,903

 

2,127

 

Debt

 

G

 

5,779

 

724

 

Debt payable to IBM

 

C,G

 

24,698

 

26,306

 

Taxes

 

K

 

530

 

669

 

Other liabilities

 

H

 

269

 

228

 

Total liabilities

 

 

 

$

35,954

 

$

31,577

 

Contingencies and commitments

 

J

 

 

 

 

 

Member’s interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Prior investment from Member

 

 

 

$

 

$

3,912

 

Member’s interest

 

 

 

3,101

 

 

Retained earnings

 

 

 

302

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

 

158

 

(209

)

Total Member’s interest

 

 

 

$

3,562

 

$

3,703

 

Total liabilities and Member’s interest

 

 

 

$

39,516

 

$

35,279

 

(Dollars in millions)

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income

$

430

$

597

$

750

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

Provision for/(benefit from) credit losses

 

(5)

 

9

 

15

Depreciation

 

160

 

193

 

231

Deferred taxes

 

84

 

51

 

14

Net (gain)/loss on asset sales and other

 

(118)

 

(104)

 

68

Change in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

Other assets/other liabilities

 

(321)

 

353

 

(43)

Net cash provided by operating activities

$

231

$

1,099

$

1,034

Cash flows from investing activities:

 

 

 

Originations of financing receivables

$

(15,340)

$

(14,456)

$

(12,028)

Collection of financing receivables

 

14,478

 

13,833

 

12,428

Short-term financing receivables - net (1)

 

6,564

 

(110)

 

(1,515)

Purchase of equipment under operating leases

 

(55)

 

(243)

 

(304)

Proceeds from disposition of equipment under operating lease

 

69

 

67

 

161

Other receivables from IBM - net

1,506

(1,200)

(283)

Other investing activities - net

 

88

 

206

 

58

Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities

$

7,312

$

(1,903)

$

(1,482)

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt from IBM

$

8,950

$

8,603

$

7,869

Principal payments on debt from IBM

 

(9,339)

 

(8,213)

 

(8,335)

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

1,067

 

4,713

 

4,213

Principal payments on debt

 

(2,243)

 

(894)

 

(657)

Short-term borrowings from/(repayments to) IBM - net (1)

 

(2,205)

 

(5,119)

 

(2,043)

Short-term borrowings/(repayments) - net (1)

 

(2,678)

 

1,433

 

1,520

Net transfers (to)/from IBM

 

 

 

(942)

Contributions from IBM

148

121

Distributions to IBM

(1,231)

(700)

(437)

Net cash (used in)/provided by financing activities

$

(7,679)

$

(30)

$

1,308

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

$

(4)

$

(18)

$

48

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

$

(141)

$

(852)

$

908

Cash and cash equivalents at January 1

 

1,828

 

2,680

 

1,772

Cash and cash equivalents at December 31

$

1,687

$

1,828

$

2,680

Supplemental data

Income taxes paid - net of refunds received

$

117

$

(5)

$

301

Interest paid on debt

$

525

$

493

$

305

(1)Short-term represents original maturities of 90 days or less.

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 5249 through 84 are an integral part of the financial statements.

IBM CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31:

(Dollars in millions)

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

750

 

$

629

 

$

727

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for credit losses

 

15

 

72

 

133

 

Depreciation

 

231

 

307

 

378

 

Deferred taxes

 

14

 

(147

)

(118

)

Net (gain)/loss on asset sales and other

 

68

 

24

 

(37

)

Change in operating assets and liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other assets/other liabilities

 

(43

)

125

 

10

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

1,034

 

$

1,010

 

$

1,094

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Originations of financing receivables

 

$

(12,028

)

$

(10,999

)

$

(15,023

)

Collection of financing receivables

 

12,428

 

13,615

 

14,875

 

Short-term financing receivables - net 1

 

(1,515

)

(1,047

)

(395

)

Purchase of equipment under operating leases

 

(304

)

(378

)

(354

)

Proceeds from disposition of equipment under operating lease

 

161

 

112

 

124

 

Other receivables from IBM — net

 

(283

)

(404

)

59

 

Other investing activities — net

 

58

 

51

 

 

Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities

 

$

(1,482

)

$

951

 

$

(715

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from issuance of debt from IBM

 

$

7,869

 

$

6,753

 

$

9,585

 

Principal payments on debt from IBM

 

(8,335

)

(8,437

)

(9,229

)

Proceeds from issuance of debt

 

4,213

 

424

 

472

 

Principal payments on debt

 

(657

)

(282

)

(448

)

Short-term borrowings from/(repayments to) IBM - net 1

 

(2,043

)

1,600

 

452

 

Short-term borrowings/(repayments) - net 1

 

1,520

 

14

 

(86

)

Net transfers (to)/from IBM

 

(942

)

(1,714

)

(923

)

Contributions from IBM

 

121

 

 

 

Distributions to IBM

 

(437

)

 

 

Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities

 

$

1,308

 

$

(1,641

)

$

(176

)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

 

$

48

 

$

(34

)

$

(18

)

Net change in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

908

 

$

285

 

$

186

 

Cash and cash equivalents at January 1

 

1,772

 

1,487

 

1,301

 

Cash and cash equivalents at December 31

 

$

2,680

 

$

1,772

 

$

1,487

 

Supplemental data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income taxes paid - net of refunds received

 

$

301

 

$

327

 

$

555

 

Interest paid on debt

 

$

305

 

$

337

 

$

453

 


(1) Short-term represents original maturities of 90 days or less.

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 52 through 84 are an integral part of the financial statements.

IBM CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN MEMBER’S INTEREST

 

 

Prior

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Investment

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

From

 

Member’s

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Member’s

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Member

 

Interest

 

Earnings

 

Income/(Loss)

 

Interest

 

Member’s Interest, January 1, 2015

 

$

4,153

 

$

 

$

 

$

(66

)

$

4,087

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income plus other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

727

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

727

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(158

)

(158

)

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

569

 

Net transfers (to)/from IBM

 

(923

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(923

)

Member’s Interest, December 31, 2015

 

$

3,957

 

$

 

$

 

$

(224

)

$

3,733

 

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 52 through 8483 are an integral part of the financial statements.

 

 

Prior

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Investment

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

From

 

Member’s

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Member’s

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Member

 

Interest

 

Earnings

 

Income/(Loss)

 

Interest

 

Member’s Interest, January 1, 2016

 

$

3,957

 

$

 

$

 

$

(224

)

$

3,733

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income plus other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

629

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

629

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

15

 

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

644

 

Net transfers (to)/from IBM 1

 

(674

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(674

)

Member’s Interest, December 31, 2016

 

$

3,912

 

$

 

$

 

$

(209

)

$

3,703

 

46


(1) Includes $1.0 billion non-cash equity contribution from Table of Contents

IBM (see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions”.)CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN MEMBER'S INTEREST

    

Prior

    

    

    

Accumulated

    

 

Investment

Other

Total

From

Member's

Retained

Comprehensive

Member's

(Dollars in millions)

    

Member

    

Interest

    

Earnings

    

Income/(Loss)

    

Interest

Member’s Interest, January 1, 2017

$

3,912

$

$

$

(209)

$

3,703

Net income plus other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Net income

 

137

 

  

 

613

 

  

 

750

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

367

 

367

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

$

1,117

Net transfers (to)/from IBM

 

(942)

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

(942)

Total prior investment from Member, March 31, 2017

3,106

Transfer upon consolidation, April 1, 2017

(3,106)

3,106

Contributions from IBM

121

121

Distributions to IBM

(126)

(311)

(437)

Member’s Interest, December 31, 2017

$

$

3,101

$

302

$

158

$

3,562

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 5249 through 8483 are an integral part of the financial statements.

 

 

Prior

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Investment

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

From

 

Member’s

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Member’s

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Member

 

Interest

 

Earnings

 

Income/(Loss)

 

Interest

 

Member’s Interest, January 1, 2017

 

$

3,912

 

$

 

$

 

$

(209

)

$

3,703

 

Net income plus other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

137

 

 

 

613

 

 

 

750

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

367

 

367

 

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,117

 

Net transfers (to)/from IBM

 

(942

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(942

)

Total prior investment from Member, March 31, 2017

 

3,106

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfer upon consolidation, April 1, 2017

 

(3,106

)

3,106

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contributions from IBM

 

 

 

121

 

 

 

 

 

121

 

Distributions to IBM

 

 

 

(126

)

(311

)

 

 

(437

)

Member’s Interest, December 31, 2017

 

$

 

$

3,101

 

$

302

 

$

158

 

$

3,562

 

Accumulated

Other

Total

Member's

Retained

Comprehensive

Member’s

(Dollars in millions)

    

    

Interest

    

Earnings

    

Income/(Loss)

    

Interest

Member’s Interest, January 1, 2018

$

3,101

$

302

$

158

$

3,562

Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (1)

5

(5)

Net income plus other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

Net income

 

597

597

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

 

(186)

(186)

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

$

411

Contributions from IBM

148

148

Distributions to IBM

(34)

(666)

(700)

Member’s Interest, December 31, 2018

$

3,216

$

238

$

(33)

$

3,420

(1)Reflects the adoption of the FASB guidance on stranded tax effects. Refer to note B, "Accounting Changes."

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 5249 through 8483 are an integral part of the financial statements.

47

Accumulated

Other

Total

Member's

Retained

Comprehensive

Member’s

(Dollars in millions)

    

Interest

    

Earnings

    

Income/(Loss)

    

Interest

Member’s Interest, January 1, 2019

$

3,216

$

238

$

(33)

$

3,420

Net income plus other comprehensive income/(loss):

  

 

Net income

 

430

430

Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax

 

2

2

Total comprehensive income/(loss)

 

$

432

Contributions from IBM (1)

 

64

64

Distributions to IBM

(679)

(553)

(1,231)

Member’s Interest, December 31, 2019

$

2,601

$

116

$

(31)

$

2,686

(1)Includes $64 million non-cash equity contribution from IBM. Refer to note C, "Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions."

Amounts may not add due to rounding.

The accompanying notes on pages 49 through 83 are an integral part of the financial statements.

48

49

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE A. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In 2017, International Business Machines Corporation (IBM or the parent) reorganized the legal entity structure of its global financing operations that reside within IBM’s Global Financing (IGF) business segment (IGF) to consolidate Client Financing and Commercial Financing under IBM Credit LLC (IBM Credit or the company), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of IBM. This change drives operational benefits by consolidating the financing business under IBM Credit in the majority of countries in which IGF operates. IBM Credit operates as part of the IBM Global Financing segment. IBM’s IGF segment remains unchanged and continues to include IBM Credit, as well as IBM’s remanufacturing and remarketing business.

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes of IBM Credit have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP).

Within the Consolidated Financial Statements and tables presented, certain columns and rows may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes. Percentages presented are calculated from the underlying whole-dollar amounts.

Member’s interest in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position represents the accumulation of the company's net income over time, contributions from IBM and distributions to IBM. During the second quarter of 2017, certain non-U.S. affiliates of IBM Credit became subsidiaries of the company, which were subsequently reported on a consolidated basis. All prior periods have been recast to reflect the consolidation of the financial statements and conform to the current year presentation as a result of changes to certain financial statement line items. These changes include other receivables from IBM and accounts payable, which are separately reported in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and were previously reported within other assets and other liabilities, respectively. Other receivables from IBM are separately reported in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and were previously reported within other investing activities-net. The reporting for accounts payable within the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows did not change.

The historical presentation of the Consolidated Financial Statements for the company is based on the financing activities of IBM’s Global Financing (IGF) segment. The IGF segment operates two primary activities: IBM Credit’s financing businesses and IBM’s remanufacturing and remarketing business. In 2016, the company divested its remanufacturing and remarketing business in the U.S. to IBM. For additional information, see note N, “Discontinued Operations.” For the periods prior to 2017, account balances not discretely identified to IBM Credit were attributed based on the methodology described in note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions,” note K, “Taxes,” and note L, “Retirement-Related Benefits.” During 2016, in connection with IGF’s separation of certain assets and liabilities related to IBM Credit’s financing businesses, Client Financing and Commercial Financing, from IBM’s other businesses in the majority of countries where IGF operates, certain impaired receivables and related allowances were retained by IBM due to IBM’s ongoing collection efforts. Accordingly, these impaired receivables and related provisions were historically part of the IBM Credit business and are included in the Consolidated Financial Statements prior to 2016, but are excluded as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. For additional information, see note E, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM.” All significant intracompany transactions between IBM Credit’s businesses have been eliminated. All significant intercompany transactions between IBM Credit and IBM have been included in these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Member’s Interest in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position represents the accumulation of the company’s net income over time and contributions from IBM and distributions to IBM. Prior to the consolidation of the financial statements, in the second quarter of 2017, net non-trade intercompany transactions between IBM Credit and IBM (for example, contributions from IBM and distributions to IBM), were reflected as net transfers (to)/from IBM in the financing activities section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. Distributions by the company to IBM are considered first to be a return of profit as reflected in the balance of retained earnings in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. Any amount distributed to IBM in excess of the company’s available balance currently in retained earnings is considered a return of a portion of the balance of Member’s interest as reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Cash and cash equivalents primarily representrepresents cash held locally by entities and is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The company invests a portion of its excess cash in short-term interest bearing accounts with IBM, which can be withdrawn upon demand. The cash invested with IBM is presented in other receivables from IBM in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions.”

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“U.S. tax reform”) was enacted The amount of restricted cash included in the U.S. This Act introduced many changes, including loweringConsolidated Statement of Financial Position and Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows was immaterial for the U.S. corporate tax rate to 21 percent, changesperiods presented.

All significant intracompany transactions between IBM Credit's businesses have been eliminated. All significant intercompany transactions between IBM Credit and IBM have been included in incentives, provisions to prevent U.S. base erosion and significant changesthese Consolidated Financial Statements.

Beginning in the taxationsecond quarter of international income, including provisions which allow for2019, and continuing throughout the repatriationyear, the company wound down the OEM IT portion of foreign earnings without U.S. tax.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)its Commercial Financing operations.

The enactment of U.S. tax reform resulted in a provisional one-time net benefit of $162 million to tax expense in the fourth-quarter and year ended December 31, 2017. The net benefit was primarily the result of the re-measurement of deferred tax balances to the new U.S. Federal tax rate, as well as the U.S. transition tax and any foreign tax costs on undistributed foreign earnings. For additional information, see note K, “Taxes.”

Within the Consolidated Financial Statements and tables presented, certain columns and rows may not add due to the use of rounded numbers for disclosure purposes. Percentages presented are calculated from the underlying whole-dollar amounts.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, costs, expenses and other comprehensive income/(loss) (OCI) that are reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying disclosures. Estimates are made for the following, among others: income taxes, loss contingencies, residual values of lease assets, allowance for credit losses and other matters. These estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events, historical experience, actions that the company may undertake in the future and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. As a result, actualActual results may be different from these estimates. See “Critical Accounting Estimates” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis

50

Revenue

Financing revenue includes financing income attributable to sales-type leases, direct financing leases and loans, including installment payment plans and participated receivables, used to finance the purchase of IBM and OEM IToriginal equipment manufacturers’ (OEM) information technology (IT) products and services, and is recognized on the accrual basis using the effective interest method over the life of the related financing receivable. Direct costs of originating these leases and loans are deferred and amortized over the term of the related financing receivables using the effective interest method and are included as part of the carrying value of the assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. Amortization of these direct costs is netted against financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

Financing revenue also includes income earned from working capital financing for suppliers, distributors and resellers of IBM and OEM IT products and services, as well as purchased interests in certain of IBM’s trade accounts receivable.resellers. This income is recognized on an accrual basis using the effective interest method.method.

Operating lease revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Direct costs of originating these leases are deferred and amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term and are included as part of the carrying value of the assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Financing Receivables and Allowance for Credit Losses

Client Financing receivables include sales-type leases, direct financing leases, commercial financing receivables and loans.client loans and installment payment receivables (loans). Leases are accounted for in accordance with lease accounting standards. Loan receivables, including installment payment plans and participated receivables, which are generally unsecured, are primarily for software and services. Loans are financial assets whichand are recorded at amortized cost, net of allowance for credit losses, which approximate fair value. Commercial Financing receivables are carried at amortized cost, which approximate fair value. These receivables are for working capital financing to suppliers, distributors, and resellers of IBM and OEM IT products and services. The company determines its allowances for credit losses on Client Financing receivables for each of the three portfolio segments:3 portfolios: lease receivables, loan receivables and participated receivables. The company further segments each of the portfolios into three3 classes: Americas, Europe/Middle East/Africa (EMEA) and Asia Pacific.

When calculating the allowances, the company considers its ability to mitigate a potential loss by repossessing leased equipment and by considering the current fair value of any other collateral. The value of the equipment is the net realizable value. The allowance for credit losses for sales-type and direct financing leases, installment payment plan receivables and customer loans includes an assessment of the entire balance of the lease or loan, including amounts not yet due. The methodologies that the company uses to calculate its receivables reserves, which are applied consistently to its different portfolios, are as follows:

Individually evaluated—The company reviews all financing receivables considered at risk on a quarterly basis. The review primarily consists ofand performs an analysis based upon current information available about the client, such as financial statements, news reports, published credit ratings, and current market-implied credit analysis, as well as the current economic environment, collateral net of repossession cost and prior collection history. For loans that are collateralized, impairment is measured using

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

the fair value of the collateral when foreclosure is probable. Using this information, the company determines the expected cash flow for the receivable and calculates an estimate of the potential loss and the probability of loss. For those accounts in which the loss is probable, the company records a specific reserve.

Collectively evaluated—The company records an unallocated reserve that is calculated by applying a reserve rate to its portfolios, excluding accounts that have been individually evaluated and specifically reserved. This reserve rate is based upon credit rating, probability of default, term, characteristics (lease/loan) and loss history. Factors that could result in actual receivable losses that are materially different from the estimated reserve include sharp changes in the economy, or a significant change in the economic health of a particular client that represents a concentration in the company’s receivables portfolio.

51

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Other Credit-Related Policies

Past due—The company views receivables as past due when payment has not been received after 90 days, measured from the original billing date.

Impaired receivables—The company evaluates financing receivables for impairment on a quarterly basis. The company considers any receivable with an individually evaluated reserve as impaired. These receivables are subjected to credit analysis to evaluate the associated risk and, when appropriate, actions are taken to mitigate risks in these agreements which include covenants to protect against credit deterioration during the life of the obligation.

Non-accrual—Non-accrual assets are those receivables (impaired loans or non-performing leases included in the receivables portfolio) with specific reserves and other accounts for which it is likely that the company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the original terms of the lease or loan agreement. IncomeInterest income recognition is discontinued on these receivables. Cash collections are first applied as a reduction to principal outstanding. Any cash received in excess of principal payments outstanding is considered interest income and is recognized as financing revenue. Receivables may be removed from non-accrual status, if appropriate, based upon changes in client circumstances, such as a sustained history of payments.

Write-off—Receivable losses are charged against the allowance in the period in which the receivable is deemed uncollectible. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Write-offs of receivables and associated reserves occur to the extent that there is no reasonable expectation of additional collections. The company’s assessments factor in the financial condition of the client, history of collections and write-offs in specific countries and across the portfolio.

Estimated Residual Values of Lease Assets

The recorded residual values of lease assets are estimated at the inception of the lease to be the expected fair value of the assets at the end of the lease term. The residual values for capitalsales-type leases are included in net investment in direct financing leasesreceivables in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. For additional information, see note F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM.” Residual values for operating leases are included in equipment under operating lease.

lease in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

The company periodically reassesses the realizable value of its lease residual values. Anticipated decreases in specific future residual values that are considered to be other-than-temporary are recognized immediately upon identification and are recorded as an adjustment to the residual value estimate. For sales-type and direct financing leases, this reduction lowers the recorded net investment and is recognized as a loss charged to financing revenue in the period in which the estimate is changed, as well as an adjustment to unearned income to reduce future-period financing income. The company has agreed to sell to IBM all equipment returned fromat end of lease at cost, which approximates fair value.

Cash Equivalents

All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase are considered to be cash equivalents.

Financial Instruments

In determining the fair value of its financial instruments, the company uses a variety of methods and assumptions that are based on market conditions and risks existing at each balance sheet date. For additional information, see note D, “Financial Instruments.” All methods of assessing fair value result in a general approximation of value, and such value may never actually be realized.

52

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Fair Value MeasurementMeasurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The company is required to classifyclassifies certain assets and liabilities based on the following fair value hierarchy:

·                  Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that can be accessed at the measurement date;

·                  Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and

·                  Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that can be accessed at the measurement date;
Level 2—Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly; and
Level 3—Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Observable market data is used, if such data is available, without undue cost and effort.

When available, the company uses unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets to measure the fair value and classifies such items withinas Level 1. If quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon internally developed models that use current market-based or independently sourced market parameters, such as interest rates and currency rates. Items valued using internally generated models are classified according to the lowest level input or value driver that is significant to the valuation.

The determination of fair value considersincludes an assessment of various factors including interest rate yield curves and time value underlying the financial instruments. For derivatives and debt securities, the company uses a discounted cash flow analysis using discount rates commensurate with the duration of the instrument.

In determining the fair value of financial instruments, the company considers certain market valuation adjustments to the “base valuations” calculated using the methodologies described below for several parameters that market participants would consider in determining fair value:

Counterparty credit risk adjustments are applied to financial instruments, taking into account the actual credit risk of a counterparty as observed in the credit default swap market to determine the true fair value of such instrument.
Credit risk adjustments are applied to reflect the company’s own credit risk when valuing all liabilities measured at fair value. The methodology is consistent with that applied in developing counterparty credit risk adjustments, but incorporates the company’s own credit risk as observed in the credit default swap market.

·      Counterparty credit risk adjustments are applied to financial instruments, taking into account the actual credit risk of a counterparty as observed in the credit default swap market to determine the true fair value of such an instrument

·      Credit risk adjustments are applied to reflect the company’s own credit risk when valuing all liabilities measured at fair value. The methodology is consistent with that applied in developing counterparty credit risk adjustments, but incorporates the company’s own credit risk as observed in the credit default swap market.

As an example, the fair value of derivatives is derived utilizing a discounted cash flow model that uses observable market inputs such as known notional value amounts, yield curves, spot and forward exchange rates as well as discount rates. These inputs relate to liquid, heavily traded currencies with active markets which are available for the full term of the derivative.

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Certain assets that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis can be subject to nonrecurring fair value measurements. These assets include available-for-sale debt securities that are deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired. In the event of an other-than-temporary impairment of a financial investment,debt security, fair value is measured using a model described above.

Accounting guidance permits the measurement of eligible financial assets, financial liabilities and firm commitments at fair value, on an instrument-by-instrument basis, that are otherwise not permitted to be accounted for at fair value under other accounting standards. This election is irrevocable. The company has not applied the fair value option to any eligible assets or liabilities.

Income Taxes

The company’s provision for income taxes is calculated on reported income before income taxes in the Consolidated Financial Statements using a separate tax return method modified to apply the benefits-for-loss approach, which is consistent with the company’s Tax Sharing Agreement with IBM. Under this approach, the provision for income taxes is computed as if the company filed tax returns on a separate tax return basis and is then adjusted, as necessary, to reflect IBM’s reimbursement for any tax benefits generated by the company. For additional information on the company’s Tax Sharing Agreement with IBM, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions.”

53

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Deferred income taxes reflect the effect of temporary differences between asset and liability amounts that are recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts that are recognized for income tax purposes. These deferred taxes are measured by applying currently enacted tax laws and rates.

laws.

Valuation allowances are recognized to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized when applying the separate tax return method modified to apply the benefits-for-loss approach. In assessing the need for a valuation allowance, management considers all available evidence for each jurisdiction, including past operating results, estimates of future taxable income and the feasibility of ongoing tax planning strategies. When the company changes its determination as to the amount of deferred tax assets that can be realized, the valuation allowance is adjusted with a corresponding impact to income tax expense in the period in which such determination is made.

The company recognizes additional tax liabilities when despite the company’s belief that its tax return positions are supportable, the company believes that certain positions may not be fully sustained upon review by tax authorities. Benefits from tax positions are originally measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement.

The company’s U.S. federal and certain state and foreign operations are included in various IBM consolidated tax returns; and, in such cases, IBM makes payments to tax authorities on the company’s behalf. IBM and the company maintain a Tax Sharing Agreement for any operations included in an IBM consolidated tax return, pursuant to which IBM charges the company for any taxes owed and reimburses the company for tax attributes generated. Such charges or reimbursements are based upon a calculation of the company’s relevant pro forma stand-alone tax return.

Consistent with the Tax Sharing Agreement, where the company is part of IBM’s consolidated tax filings, the company records the initialtaxes based on tax returns as expected to be and ultimately as filed. Initial income tax benefits associated with an uncertain tax position are recorded using its best estimateestimates at the time the position originates and makes a final settlement of the position is made with IBM for the recorded amounts. Consequently, any recognition and subsequent changes in assessment about the sustainability of tax positions, including valuation allowances and interest and penalties, are the responsibility of IBM. Because the company bears no0 risk associated with the sustainability of

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

uncertain tax positions, there are no0 uncertain tax liabilities recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements for entities that file as part of IBM’s consolidated tax filings.

Where the company is not part of IBM’s consolidated tax filings, to the extent that new information becomes available that causes the company to change its judgment regarding the adequacy of existing tax liabilities, such changes to tax liabilities will impact the company’s provision for income taxes in the period in which such determination is made. Interest and penalties, if any, related to accrued liabilities for potential tax assessments are included in the provision for income taxes.

taxes in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

Equipment under Operating Lease

Equipment under operating lease is carried at cost and depreciated over the lease term using the straight-line method, generally ranging from one to sixfour years. The depreciable basis is the original cost of the equipment less the estimated residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease term. These assets are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The impairment test is based on undiscounted cash flows, and, if impaired, the asset is written down to fair value based on either discounted cash flows or appraised values.

Expense and Other Income

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expense is charged against income as incurred. Expenses of promoting and selling financing solutions are classified as selling expense and include such items as compensation, advertising, sales commissions and travel. General and administrative expense includes such items as compensation, legal costs, office

54

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

supplies, non-income taxes, insurance and office rental. A portion of SG&A is charged to the company by IBM. For further information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions.”

Other Income and Expense

Other income and expense includes the net gain or loss from the sale of IBM and OEM IT equipment to clients, as well as the sale of equipment to IBM upon termination of a lease. Net gains on theseThese transactions are recorded within the Client Financing Segment asin other (income) and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. Also included are foreign currency gains and losses and fees for credit insurance.

The company sells to IBM equipment returned from lease at cost, which approximates fair value. In addition, IBM may migrate a client to new technology. In the event this migration results in an early termination of a lease, IBM will purchase the returned equipment from the company at a pre-negotiated price, which is a function of the discounted value of the scheduled future lease payments and the residual value.

Translation of Non-U.S. Currency Amounts

Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries that have a local functional currency are translated to U.S. dollars at year-end exchange rates. Translation adjustments are recorded in other comprehensive income. Income and expense items are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange prevailing during the year.

Non-monetary assets and liabilities of non-U.S. subsidiaries and branches that operate in U.S. dollars are translated at the approximate exchange rates prevailing when the company acquired the assets or liabilities. All other assets and liabilities denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars are translated at year-end exchange rates with the transaction net gain or loss recognized in other (income) and expense. Income and expense items are translated at the weighted-average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. These translation gains and losses are included in net income for the period in which exchange rates change.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The company’s earnings and cash flows are subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. The company may use derivative financial instruments to manage foreign currency exchange rate and interest rate exposures. Derivatives that the company uses are primarily foreign exchange forward contracts. All derivatives are recorded at fair value. For additional information, see note D, “Financial Instruments.”

NOTE B. ACCOUNTING CHANGES

New Standards to be Implemented

In June 2016, with amendments in 2018 and 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance for credit impairment based on an expected loss model rather than an incurred loss model. It requires the consideration of all available relevant information when estimating expected credit losses, including past events, current conditions and forecasts and their implications for expected credit losses. It also expands the scope of financial instruments subject to impairment, including off-balance sheet commitments and residual value. The guidance was effective January 1, 2020, with one-year early adoption permitted. The company adopted the guidance as of the effective date using the transition option whereby prior comparative periods will not be retrospectively presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements, and has completed its changes to policy, processes, systems and controls accordingly. This included the assessment of data availability and presentation necessary to meet the disclosure requirements of the guidance. At January 1, 2020, an increase in the allowance for credit losses of approximately $30 million was recorded for financing receivables. The company also recorded an allowance for credit losses of approximately $25 million in other liabilities for its off-balance sheet commitments. Additionally, net deferred taxes were reduced by approximately $15 million in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, resulting in a cumulative-effect net decrease to retained earnings of approximately $40 million.

55

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Standards Implemented

NOTE B. ACCOUNTING CHANGESIn August 2018, the FASB issued guidance, which changed the disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The guidance was effective on January 1, 2020, with early adoption of certain provisions permitted. The company adopted the provision in the fair value guidance that removed the Level 1/ Level 2 transfer disclosures in the third quarter of 2018 and the remaining provisions of the guidance are not applicable. As the guidance is a change to disclosures only, it did not have a material impact in the consolidated financial results.

New StandardsThe FASB issued guidance in February 2016, with amendments in 2018 and 2019, which changed the accounting for leases. The guidance requires lessees to recognize right-of-use (ROU) assets and lease liabilities for most leases in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. For lessors, it also eliminates the use of third-party residual value guarantee (RVG) insurance in the lease classification test, and overall aligns with the new revenue recognition guidance. Due to changes to lease termination guidance, when equipment is returned to the company prior to the end of the lease term, the carrying amounts of lease receivables will be Implemented

reclassified to loan receivables. The guidance also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The company adopted the guidance effective January 1, 2019, using the transition option whereby prior comparative periods were not retrospectively presented in the consolidated financial statements. The company elected the package of practical expedients not to reassess prior conclusions related to contracts containing leases, lease classification and initial direct costs (IDCs). From a lessor perspective, IDCs and removal of third-party RVG insurance in the lease classification test did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial results. At December 31, 2019, lease receivables of $273 million were reclassified to loan receivables. There were no material impacts of adoption from a lessee perspective as there are no material lease arrangements in which the company is a lessee. Refer to note E, “Leases,” for additional information, including further discussion on the impact of adoption.

In February 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)FASB issued guidance that allows entities to elect an option to reclassify the stranded tax effects related to the application of U.S. tax reform from accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) (AOCI) to retained earnings. In accordance with its accounting policy, the company releases income tax effects from AOCI once the reason the tax effects were established ceases to exist (e.g., when available-for-sale debt securities are sold or if a pension plan is liquidated). This guidance allows for the reclassification of stranded tax effects as a result of the change in tax rates from U.S. tax reform to be recorded upon adoption of the guidance rather than at the actual cessation date. The guidance iswas effective January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The company is currently evaluating whetheradopted the guidance effective January 1, 2018, and elected not to elect the option and the impact of the new guidancereclassify prior periods. At adoption on its consolidated financial results.

January 1, 2018, $5 million was reclassified from AOCI to retained earnings.

In August 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)FASB issued guidance to simplify the application of current hedge accounting in certain areas, and to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and make targeted improvements to the presentation and disclosure requirements for hedge accounting.requirements. The guidance iswas effective January 1, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The company adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2018, and doesit did not expecthave a material impact in the consolidated financial results.

In June 2016, the FASB issued guidance for credit impairment based on an expected loss model rather than an incurred loss model. The guidance requires the consideration of all available relevant information when estimating expected credit losses, including past events, current conditions and forecasts and their implications for expected credit losses. The guidance is effective January 1, 2020, with a one-year early adoption permitted. The company has established an implementation team and is evaluating the impact of the new guidance.

The FASB issued guidance in February 2016, with amendments in 2018, which changes the accounting for leases. The guidance requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for most leases in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The guidance makes some changes to lessor accounting, including the elimination of the use of third-party residual value guarantee insurance in the capital lease test, and overall aligns with the new revenue recognition guidance. The guidance also requires qualitative and quantitative disclosures to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. There are certain practical expedients that can be elected which the company is currently evaluating for application. The guidance is effective January 1, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The company will adopt the guidance as of the effective date. A cross-functional implementation team has been established which is evaluating the lease portfolio, system, process and policy change requirements. The company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on its consolidated financial results.

The FASB issued guidance on the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers in May 2014 with amendments in 2015 and 2016. Revenue recognition will depictdepicts the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance also requires specific disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty ofrelating to revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The guidance permits two methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented, or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the cumulative catch-up transition method).recognition. The company adopted the guidance on January 1, 2018, using the cumulative catch-upmodified-retrospective transition method.

The company has concluded that substantially all of its financing and operating lease revenue streams are not within the scope of the guidance, as they are governed by other accounting standards, and no cumulative effect of change in accounting principle was recorded at adoption.standards. The guidance isdid not expected to have a materialan impact onin the company’s consolidated financial results. The company has also concluded its assessment of the data availability and presentation necessary to meet the additional disclosure requirements of the guidance in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and does not expect any material change to disclosures as a result of the adoption of the guidance.

NOTE C. RELATIONSHIP WITH IBM AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

IBM Credit is a captive finance company and an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of IBM. IBM Credit generally conducts its financing activities with IBM on an arm’s-length basis, subject in certain cases, particularly with respect to

56

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

originations, to commercial factors, including IBM’s relationship with a client. The following is a description of certain material relationships between IBM Credit and IBM, regarding support, operating, borrowing, licensing, service and other arrangements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Support Agreement

Pursuant to a Support Agreement between IBM and IBM Credit, IBM has agreed to retain, directly or indirectly, beneficial ownership of at least 51 percent of the equity voting interests in the company at all times. IBM has also agreed to cause the company to have a minimum consolidated tangible net worth of at least $50 million on the last day of each of the company’s fiscal years (with consolidated tangible net worth for purposes of this discussion of the Support Agreement understood to mean (a) the total assets of IBM Credit and its consolidated subsidiaries less (b) the intangible assets and total liabilities of IBM Credit and its consolidated subsidiaries). IBM has also agreed to cause the company to maintain a leverage ratio not to exceed 11 to 1 for each of the company’s fiscal quarters (with leverage ratio for purposes of this discussion of the Support Agreement understood to mean, for any calendar quarter, IBM Credit’s debt-to-equity ratio as reported in, and calculated in the manner set forth in, IBM Credit’s periodic report covering such fiscal quarter). In the event that the company’s leverage ratio at the end of any fiscal quarter is higher than 11 to 1, then, upon demand by the company, IBM has agreed to make or cause to be made a capital contribution to the company in an amount sufficient to cause the company’s leverage ratio to not exceed 11 to 1. The Support Agreement is not a guarantee by IBM of any indebtedness, other obligation, or liability of any kind of IBM Credit.

Operating Relationship

The company originates financing with end-user clients, which are primarily IBM customers that elect to finance their acquisition of IBM’s hardware, software, and services.

Where IBM Credit’s financing contract is bundled with IBM’s product and service contract to create a combined periodic payment schedule for the entire offering, the offering is termed a Total Solution Offering.

For IBM Total Solution Offerings in certain countries, as well as for certain government and other contracts, IBM Credit is not a party to IBM’s contract with the end-user client. Instead, IBM directly provides the end-user client with the financing. Beginning in 2016, IBM Credit purchases a participation interest from IBM that represents the financing portion of such transactions and assumes the credit risk of IBM’s end-user client. The outstanding amount of these receivables, net of allowance for credit losses, was $3,798$4,303 million and $2,423$4,065 million as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, and is included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as receivables purchased/participated from IBM. Prior to 2016, the receivables were part of financing receivables in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. These receivables earned $165$191 million, $188 million and $21$165 million of interest income in 20172019, 2018 and 2016,2017, respectively, which is included in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings as financing revenue. For additional information, see note E,F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

TheWithin the Commercial Financing segment, the company purchases interests in certain of IBM’s trade and other accounts receivable at a discount and assumes the associated credit risk of IBM’s client. In the second quarter of 2019, IBM and the company suspended the program under which IBM Credit purchases interests in IBM’s trade accounts receivable. Amounts outstanding, net of allowance for credit losses, at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 were $1,441$56 million and $1,474$1,369 million, respectively, and are included within receivables purchased/participated from IBM in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The finance income earned from these receivables was $25 million, $42 million and $35 million, $39 millionin 2019, 2018 and $34 million, in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. For additional information, see note E,F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In certain countries, the company provides loans to IBM, primarily in support of IBM’s Global Technology Services & Cloud Platforms segment’s acquisition of IT assets, which it uses in external, revenue-producing services contracts. This financing is included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as financing receivables from IBM. The interest income earned from these receivables was $167 million, $171 million and $140 million, $129 millionin 2019, 2018 and $141 million, in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and is included in financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. The amount of such financings outstanding at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 was $3,743$3,870 million and $3,513$3,609 million, respectively.

57

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

The outstanding amountamounts of other receivables from IBM of $1,024$513 million and $482$2,019 million at December 31, 20172019 and 20162018, respectively, primarily relate to the investment of a portion of the company’scompany's excess cash in short-term interest bearing accounts with IBM, which can be withdrawn upon demand. The company’scompany's investment of excess cash with IBM was $911$509 million and $450$2,014 million at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. The higherinvestment of excess cash position in 2017 provided additional liquidity to certain IBM Credit subsidiaries. The cash on deposit with IBM is presented as other receivables from IBM in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and in the investing section of the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows. The interest income earned from these investments was $24 million in 2019, $59 million in 2018 and $36 million in 2017, and is included in financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. Interest income earned from these investments during 2016 and 2015 was not material.

In addition, within the Commercial Financing segment, the company provides financing at market rateswhich includes an interest free period to suppliers, distributors and resellers of IBM products and services, a portion of which is supplementedfunded by financing incentives from IBM to cover an interest free period.IBM. Fee income earned from these financing incentives under these arrangements was $150 million, $154 million and $144 million $142 millionin 2019, 2018 and $155 million in 2017,

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

2016 and 2015, respectively. These fees are included inas financing revenue in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings and are deferred and recognized over the term of the financing arrangement.

Borrowing Relationship

The company has a credit facilityfacilities with IBM that allowsallow the company to obtain short-termshort- and long-term funding on an as neededas-needed basis and the company seeks to substantially match fundmatch-fund the term, currency and interest rate variability of its debt against its underlying financing assets. The general terms of the loans under the credit facilities are set forth in a customarystandard intercompany loan agreement,agreements, which includesinclude standard default clauses (including failure to pay interest or principal when due, bankruptcy and ceasing to be a wholly owned subsidiary). The specific terms of any individual loan, including the interest rate and term applicable to each loan, are set forth in a loan confirmation statement that is issued at the time of each individual borrowing under the facility. IBM Credit is entitled to prepay loans issued under thisthese credit facilityfacilities from time to time, subject to payment of any agreed to penalty or premium.

These loans are included in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as debt payable to IBM. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the company had borrowings outstanding under such agreements of $24,698$16,945 million and $26,306$19,580 million, respectively. Interest expense of $265$242 million, $301$298 million and $425$265 million was incurred on loans from IBM during 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively, and is included as financing cost in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. For more information on short-termshort- and long-term funding, see note G,H, “Borrowings,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Services and Other Arrangements

The company sources a number of services from IBM, including functional support for collection administration, treasury, accounting, legal, tax, human resources, marketing and IT.IT services. In certain instances, IBM acts as IBM Credit’s billing and collection agent and forwards the financing payments to IBM Credit. The company also has the right to use certain IBM intangibles in its business. Where practical, allocationscharges of the expenses incurred by IBM in the provision of these functional support services are based upon direct usage. For the remainder, where possible, expenses are allocatedcharged on measurable non-financial drivers, such as number of employees. When a clear and measurable non-financial driver cannot be established, these expenses are allocatedcharged based on a measurable financial driver, such as net margin. Management believes that these allocation methodscharges are reasonable. In addition, the company conducts its global operations primarily from IBM leased or IBM owned facilities for which IBM charges the company for occupancy expenses by IBM based on square footage space usage with no fixed term commitment. For the support services and occupancy expenses referred to above, IBM charged the company $195 million, $204 million and $218 million $223 millionin 2019, 2018 and $190 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The company participates in the various IBM stock-based compensation plans, including awards of Restricted Stock Units and Performance Share Units. Amounts charged by IBM to the company related to stock-based compensation expense during the periods reported were not material.

The company participates in certain multiemployer retirement-related plans that are sponsored by IBM. Charges from IBM to the company in relation to these multiemployer plans (including non-pension post-retirement benefits) are limited to service costs. The company is charged by IBM using an allocation method based on the number of employees. Contributions and any other types of costs for these multiemployer plans are the responsibility of IBM. In certain countries, the company

58

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

participates in multiple employerplans that are accounted for as multiple-employer plans. For these plans, the retirement-related plan obligation is owned by the company and is generally calculated using actuarial valuations. Under these plans, IBM manages the assets and allocates them to the company based on the company’s obligation. The company also participates in certain defined contribution plans and is charged by IBM based on the number of employees. For additional information, see note L, “Retirement-RelatedM, "Retirement-Related Benefits,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Expenses related to the services discussed above are included in SG&A expense in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. It is not practical to estimate the actual costs that would have been incurred had IBM Credit been a separate company during the periods presented. These costs also may not be indicative of the expenses that IBM Credit will incur in the future or would have incurred if the company had obtained these services from a third party.

The outstanding amount of accounts payable to IBM of $2,903was $336 million and $2,127$3,044 million at December 31, 20172019 and 2016 respectively, primarily relate2018, respectively. The decline in accounts payable to unsettledIBM reflects settlements of purchases of equipment orand receivables/loans (for software and services) from IBM.. Beginning in the second half of 2019, the majority of such purchases were settled in the same period. This payable account is non-interest bearing and short term in nature and is expected to be settled in the normal course of business. In the first quarter of 2016, approximately $1,000 million of the balance payable to IBM as of December 31, 2015 was settled through a non-cash, equity contribution to the

The company from IBM.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Beginning in 2016, the company started sellingsells to IBM equipment returned fromat end of lease at cost, which approximates fair value. In addition, IBM may migrate a client to new technology. In the event this migration results in an early termination of a lease, IBM will purchase the returned equipment at a pre-negotiated price, which is a function of the discounted value of the scheduled future lease payments and the residual value. The company’scompany's net profit from sales of returned equipment to IBM was $56 million in 2019, $62 million in 2018, and $80 million in 2017. The company’s net profit from sales of returned equipment to IBM in 2016 was not material. These sales are recorded net in other (income) and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

Tax Sharing Agreement

The company’s U.S. federal and certain state and foreign operations are included in various IBM consolidated tax returns; and, in such cases, IBM makes payments to tax authorities on the company’s behalf. IBM and the company maintain a Tax Sharing Agreement for any operations included in an IBM consolidated tax return, pursuant to which IBM charges the company for any taxes owed and reimburses the company for tax attributes generated. Such charges or reimbursements are based upon a calculation of the company’s relevant pro forma stand-alone tax return. For additional information, see note L, "Taxes,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTE D. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair Value Measurements

Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

The following tables present the company’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2017

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

 

$

 

$

1,883

 

$

 

$

1,883

 

Money market funds

 

5

 

 

 

5

 

Total

 

5

 

1,883

 

 

1,888

 

Derivative assets 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

3

 

 

3

 

Total

 

 

3

 

 

3

 

Total assets

 

$

5

 

$

1,886

 

$

 

$

1,891

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative liabilities 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts with IBM

 

$

 

$

19

 

$

 

$

19

 

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

 

37

 

 

37

 

Total liabilities

 

$

 

$

56

 

$

 

$

56

 

59


(1)  Included within cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated StatementTable of Financial Position.Contents

(2)  Included within other assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

(3)  Included within other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2016

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash equivalents 1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

 

$

 

$

1,019

 

$

 

$

1,019

 

Money market funds

 

100

 

 

 

100

 

Total

 

100

 

1,019

 

 

1,119

 

Derivative assets 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

 

115

 

 

115

 

Total

 

 

115

 

 

115

(4)

Total assets

 

$

100

 

$

1,134

 

$

 

$

1,234

(4)

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative liabilities 3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

$

 

$

50

 

$

 

$

50

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

 

47

 

 

47

 

Total liabilities

 

$

 

$

97

 

$

 

$

97

(4)


(Dollars in millions)

 

At December 31, 2019

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

Assets:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Cash equivalents (1)

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

 

$

$

788

$

$

788

Money market funds

5

5

Total cash equivalents

5

788

793

Derivative assets (2)

45

45

Total assets

$

5

$

833

$

$

838

Liabilities:

Derivative liabilities (3)

$

$

18

$

$

18

(1)  

(1)Included within cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
(2)Included within other assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
(3)Included within other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

(Dollars in millions)

 

At December 31, 2018

    

Level 1

    

Level 2

    

Level 3

    

Total

Assets:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Cash equivalents (1)

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Time deposits and certificates of deposit

$

$

792

$

$

792

Money market funds

 

5

 

 

 

5

Total cash equivalents

 

5

 

792

 

 

797

Derivative assets (2)

 

 

18

 

 

18

Total assets

$

5

$

810

$

$

815

Liabilities:

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Derivative liabilities (3)

$

$

37

$

$

37

(1)Included within cash and cash equivalents in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
(2)Included within other assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.
(3)Included within other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

(2)  Included within other assets in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

(3)  Included within other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

(4)  If derivative exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement had been netted in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the total derivative asset and liability positions would each have been reduced by $17 million.

There were no transfers between Levels 1, 2 and 3 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.

Financial Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value

Short-Term Receivables and Payables

Short-term financing receivables are financial assets with carrying values that approximate fair value. Accounts payable, other accrued expenses and short-term debt (including debt payable to IBM) are financial liabilities with carrying values that approximate fair value. If measured at fair value in the financial statements, these financial instruments would be classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, except for short-term debt, which would be classified as Level 2.

Long-Term Receivables

Fair values are based on discounted future cash flows using current interest rates offered for similar loans to clients with similar credit ratings for the same remaining maturities. At December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, the difference between the carrying amount and estimated fair value for long-term receivables was immaterial. If measured at fair value in the financial statements, these financial instruments would be classified as Level 3 in the fair valuefair-value hierarchy.

Long-Term Debt

Fair value of publicly traded long-term debt is based on quoted market prices for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market. For other long-term debt, which includesincluding debt payable to IBM, for which a quoted market price is not available, an expected present value technique that uses rates currently available to the company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities is used to estimate fair value. The carrying amount of long-term debt (third-party debt as

60

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

well as debt payable to IBM) was $13,750$15,268 million and $10,505$17,276 million and the estimated fair value was $13,695$15,409 million and $10,760$17,199 million at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. If measured at fair value in the financial statements, long-term debt (including the current portion) would be classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Derivative Financial Instruments

The company operates in multiple currencies and is a lender and issuer in the capital markets and a borrower from IBM. In the normal course of business, the company may be exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations. The company limits its exposure to core market risks by following established risk management policies and procedures and through the use of match fundingmatch-funding with IBM and third parties. Although the company seeks to substantially match fundmatch-fund the terms, currency and interest rate variability of its debt against its underlying financial assets, risks may arise between assets and the related liabilities used for funding. The company may also choose to mitigate any remaining exposure relating to interest rate changes and foreign currency fluctuations through the use of interest rate or foreign exchange derivatives.

Derivative assets and liabilities are recorded in other assets and other liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and presented on a gross basis. The notional amounts of the derivative instruments do not necessarily represent amounts exchanged by the company with IBM and third parties, and are not necessarily a direct measure of the financial exposure. The company may also enter into master netting agreements with certain counterparties that allow for netting of exposures in the event of default or breach. However, in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the company does not offset derivative assets against liabilities in master netting arrangements.

At December 31, 2019, the aggregate fair value of derivative contracts with IBM that were in an asset position totaled $45 million and the aggregate fair value of derivative contracts with IBM that were in a liability position totaled $18 million. At December 31, 2018, the aggregate fair value of derivative contracts with IBM that were in an asset position totaled $18 million and the aggregate fair value of derivative contracts with IBM that were in a liability position totaled $37 million. If derivatives exposures covered by a qualifying master netting agreement with IBM had been netted in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the total derivative asset and liability positions would each have been reduced by $18 million at December 31, 2019 and the total derivative asset and liability positions would each have been reduced by $11 million at December 31, 2018.

Interest Rate Risk

Fixed and Variable Rate Borrowings

The company issues debt in the capital markets to fund its operations. Access to cost-effective financing can result in interest rate mismatches with the underlying assets. To manage these mismatches and to reduce overall interest cost, the company may enter into interest-rate swaps with IBM to convert specific fixed-rate debt issuances into variable-rate debt (i.e., fair value hedges) and to convert variable-rate debt issuances into fixed-rate debt (i.e., cash flow hedges). At December 31, 2017,2019, the total notional amount of the company’s interest rate swap contracts with IBM was $1,800$2,550 million. The weighted average remaining maturity of these instruments at December 31, 20172019 was approximately 2.92.0 years. There was noAt December 31, 2018, the total notional amount of the company’s interest rate swap activity during 2016.contracts with IBM was $3,350 million. The weighted average remaining maturity of these instruments at December 31, 2018 was approximately 2.4 years. These interest rate contracts were accounted for as fair value hedges. The company did not have any cash flow hedges relating to this program outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Foreign Exchange Risk

Long-Term Investments in Foreign Subsidiaries (Net Investment)

The company enters into foreign exchange derivatives with IBM as a hedge of net investment of its foreign subsidiaries to reduce the volatility in Member’s interest caused by changes in foreign currency exchange rates in the functional currency of major foreign subsidiaries with respect to the U.S. dollar. At December 31, 2017,2019 and 2018, the total notional

61

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

amount of derivative contracts with IBM designated as net investment hedges was $2,331 million.$1,229 million and $1,986 million, respectively. The weighted average remaining maturity of these instruments was 0.2 years. There was no hedge of net investment activity during the year ended December 31, 2016.

years at both periods.

Foreign Currency Asset/Liability Management

The company enters into foreign exchange derivative contracts to manage foreign currency exposures associated with the company’s funding from IBM and third parties. These derivatives were not designated as hedges for accounting purposes; however,purposes. However, these derivatives represent economic hedges whichthat provided an economic offset to the underlying foreign currency exposure. The terms of these derivative contracts are generally less than one year. The gains and losses recognized on economic hedges are recorded in other (income) and expense in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings, and the associated cash flows are included in other investing activities-net, in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows.

Foreign Exchange Contracts with Third Parties

At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the total notional amount of the foreign exchange derivative contracts was $120 million and $753 million, respectively.

Foreign Exchange Contracts with IBM

The foreign exchange forward contracts with IBM that were executed in late 2016 expired in early 2017 and were not replaced. There were no0 foreign exchange derivative contracts with IBM or with third parties outstanding at December 31, 2017.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

At December 31, 2016, the total notional amount of the foreign exchange forward contracts with IBM was $10.6 billion.

2019 and 2018.

The following tables provide a quantitative summary of the derivative instrument-related risk management activity as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, as well as for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively.

Fair Values of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

 

 

Fair Value of Derivative Assets

 

Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities

 

($ in millions)

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

Balance Sheet

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

Classification

 

2017

 

2016

 

Classification

 

2017

 

2016

 

Designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts with IBM

 

Other assets

 

$

 

$

 

Other liabilities

 

$

19

 

$

 

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

Other assets

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

37

 

 

 

 

Fair value of derivative assets

 

$

 

$

 

Fair value of derivative liabilities

 

$

56

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Not designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

Other assets

 

$

 

$

115

 

Other liabilities

 

$

 

$

50

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Other assets

 

3

 

 

Other liabilities

 

 

47

 

 

 

Fair value of derivative assets

 

$

3

 

$

115

 

Fair value of derivative liabilities

 

$

 

$

97

 

Total

 

 

 

$

3

 

$

115

 

 

 

$

56

 

$

97

 

Fair Value of Derivative Assets

Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities

(Dollars in millions) 

    

Balance Sheet

    

    

    

Balance Sheet

    

    

 

At December 31:

    

Classification

    

2019

    

2018

    

Classification

    

2019

    

2018

Designated as hedging instruments:

Interest rate contracts with IBM

 

Other assets

$

45

$

10

 

Other liabilities

$

$

27

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

Other assets

 

 

9

 

Other liabilities

 

18

 

11

 

Fair value of derivative assets

$

45

$

18

 

Fair value of derivative liabilities

$

18

$

37

Not designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Other assets

$

$

 

Other liabilities

$

$

 

Fair value of derivative assets

$

$

 

Fair value of derivative liabilities

$

$

Total

$

45

$

18

$

18

$

37

Notes

As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the following amounts were recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position related to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)cumulative basis adjustments for fair value hedges:

(Dollars in millions)

Line Item in the

    

    

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

At December 31, 

At December 31, 

in which the Hedged Item is Included:

2019

2018

Debt:

Carrying amount of the hedged item

$

(2,574)

$

(3,310)

Cumulative hedging adjustments included in the carrying amount - assets/(liabilities)

(28)

34

The Effect of Derivative Instruments in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings

 

 

Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Statement of

 

Recognized on

 

Attributable to Risk

 

($ in millions)

 

Earnings

 

Derivatives

 

Being Hedged2

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

Line Item

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Derivative instruments in fair value hedges1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate contracts with IBM

 

Financing cost

 

$

(25

)

$

 

$

 

$

26

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

Other (income) and expense

 

(222

)

115

 

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Other (income) and expense

 

(18

)

(46

)

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

Total

 

 

 

$

(266

)

$

70

 

$

 

$

26

 

$

 

$

 

The total amounts of income and expense line items presented in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings in which the effects of fair value hedges, net investment hedges and derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are recorded and the total effect of hedge activity on these income and expense line items, are as follows:

62

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Gains/(Losses) of

(Dollars in millions)

Total

Total Hedge Activity

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

2019

    

2018

Financing cost

$

526

 

$

503

$

23

 

$

29

Other (income) and expense

 

(72)

 

(31)

 

 

7

Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings

Consolidated

Recognized

Attributable to Risk

(Dollars in millions)

Statement of

on Derivatives

Being Hedged (2)

For the year ended December 31:

    

Earnings Line Item

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2019

    

2018

2017

Derivative instruments in fair value hedges (1):

Interest rate contracts with IBM

 

Financing cost

$

50

$

(14)

$

(25)

$

(62)

$

8

$

26

Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

Other (income) and expense

 

 

 

(222)

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

Foreign exchange contracts

 

Other (income) and expense

 

 

7

 

(18)

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

Total

$

50

$

(7)

$

(266)

$

(62)

$

8

$

26

Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income

Consolidated

Statement of

Amounts Excluded from

(Dollars in millions)

Recognized in OCI

Earnings

Reclassified from AOCI

Effectiveness Testing (3)

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

Line Item

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Derivative instruments in net investment hedges:

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

$

10

$

125

$

(6)

 

Financing cost

$

$

$

$

35

$

35

$

11

Total

$

10

$

125

$

(6)

 

  

$

$

$

$

35

$

35

$

11

(1)The amount includes changes in clean fair values of the derivative instruments in fair value hedging relationships and the periodic accrual for coupon payments required under these derivative contracts.
(2)The amount includes basis adjustments to the carrying value of the hedged item recorded during the period.
(3)The company's policy is to recognize all fair value changes in amounts excluded from effectiveness testing in net income each period.

N/A - Not applicable

 

 

Gain/(Loss) Recognized in Earnings and Other Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consolidated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ineffectiveness and

 

($ in millions)

 

Effective Portion

 

Statement of

 

Effective Portion

 

Amounts Excluded from

 

For the year ended

 

Recognized in OCI

 

Earnings

 

Reclassified from AOCI

 

Effectiveness Testing3

 

December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Line Item

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Derivative instruments in net investment hedges

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign exchange contracts with IBM

 

$

(6

)

$

 

$

 

Financing cost

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

11

 

$

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

(6

)

$

 

$

 

 

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

11

 

$

 

$

 


(1)  The amount includes changes in clean fair values of the derivative instruments in fair value hedging relationships and the periodic accrual for coupon payments required under these derivative contracts.

(2)  The amount includes basis adjustments to the carrying value of the hedged item recorded during the period.

(3)  The amount of gain/(loss) recognized in income represents amounts excluded from effectiveness on hedge relationships.

For the years ending December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, there were no significant gains or losses excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness (for fair value hedges); nor are there any anticipated in the normal course of business.

NOTE E. LEASES

Accounting for Leases as a Lessee

IBM Credit’s global operations are primarily conducted in IBM leased or owned facilities, for which IBM charges the company for occupancy expenses based on square footage usage, with no fixed term commitment. These arrangements do not represent leases and the company did not record any ROU assets or associated lease liabilities in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at January 1, 2019. For additional information, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions.” The company has no other material lease arrangements in which it is a lessee.

63

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Accounting for Leases as a Lessor

The company enters into leases as a means to provide financing to its clients. Assets under lease include new and used IBM equipment and certain OEM IT products. IBM equipment generally consists of IBM Z, Power and Storage Systems products.

When entering into a contract with its clients, the company determines whether an arrangement contains a lease at its inception. As part of that evaluation, the company considers whether there is an implicitly or explicitly identified asset in the arrangement and whether the client has the right to control that asset.

The company determines whether there is a right to control the use of the asset by assessing the client’s rights to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the identified asset and rights to direct the use of the identified asset. The company determines the classification of the lease at the lease commencement date.

Lease payments due to IBM Credit are typically fixed and paid in equal installments over the lease term. The majority of the company’s leases do not contain variable payments that are dependent on an index or a rate. Variable lease payments that do not depend on an index or a rate (e.g., property taxes) that are paid directly by the company and are reimbursed by the client, are recorded as finance income, along with the related cost, in the period in which collection of these payments is probable. Payments that are made directly by the client to a third party, including certain property taxes and insurance, are not considered part of variable payments and, therefore, are not recorded by the company. The company has made a policy election to exclude from consideration in contracts all collections from sales and other similar taxes.

The company’s payment terms for leases are typically unconditional. Therefore, in an instance when the client requests to terminate the lease prior to the end of the lease term, the client would typically be required to pay the remaining lease payments in full. At the end of the lease term, the company allows the client to either return the equipment, purchase the equipment at the then-current fair market value or a pre-stated purchase price, or renew the lease based on mutually agreed upon terms.

The following table presents amounts included in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings related to lessor activity:

(Dollars in millions)

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

Financing lease revenue

$

214

Operating lease revenue

277

Variable lease revenue

27

Total lease revenue

$

517

Sales-Type and Direct Financing Leases

If a lease is classified as a sales-type or direct financing lease, a net investment in the lease is recorded. For a sales-type lease, the net investment in the lease is measured at commencement date as the sum of the lease receivable and the estimated residual value of the equipment, less unearned income and allowance for credit losses. At December 31, 2019, the unguaranteed residual value of sales-type and direct financing leases was $531 million. For further information on the company’s investment in leases, including residual values, refer to note F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM.”

IBM Credit enters into lease arrangements for the purpose of generating revenue by providing financing. Under a net sales-type lease, eligible IDCs are deferred and recognized over the lease term. Over the term of a sales-type lease, the company recognizes financing revenue on the net investment in the lease and any variable lease payments, which are not included in the net investment in the lease.

For a direct financing lease, the investment in the lease is measured similarly to a sales-type lease, however, the net investment in the lease is reduced by any selling profit, which is typically zero. In a direct financing lease, the selling

64

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

profit and IDCs are deferred at commencement and recognized over the lease term. Prior to the adoption of the new lease guidance, the company’s leases were generally classified as direct financing leases. Due to the changes in the lease classification requirements under the new lease guidance, the company’s leases are generally classified as sales-type leases and presented on a net basis. The company rarely enters into direct financing leases.

The estimated residual value represents the estimated fair value of the equipment under lease at the end of the lease. Estimating residual value is a risk unique to financing activities, and management of this risk is dependent upon the ability to accurately project future equipment values. The company has insight into product plans and cycles for the IBM and OEM IT products under lease. The company estimates the future fair value of leased equipment by using historical models, analyzing the current market for new and used equipment and obtaining forward-looking product information such as marketing plans and technology innovations.

The company optimizes the recovery of residual values by extending lease arrangements, or selling to IBM all equipment that has been returned at the end of lease. The company has historically managed residual value risk both through insight into IBM’s own product cycles and monitoring of OEM IT product announcements. The company periodically reassesses the realizable value of its lease residual values. Anticipated decreases in specific future residual values that are considered to be other-than-temporary are recognized immediately upon identification and are recorded as an adjustment to the residual value estimate. For sales-type and direct financing leases, this reduction lowers the recorded net investment and is recognized as a loss charged to finance income in the period in which the estimate is changed, as well as an adjustment to unearned income to reduce future-period financing income. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, impairment of residual values was immaterial.

The following table presents a maturity analysis of the lease payments due to IBM Credit on sales-type and direct financing leases over the next five years and thereafter, at December 31, 2019:

(Dollars in millions)

Total

2020

$

2,000

2021

1,461

2022

817

2023

294

2024

51

Thereafter

4

Total undiscounted cash flows

$

4,626

(1)

Present value of lease payments (recognized as financing receivables)

4,242

(2)

Difference between undiscounted cash flows and discounted cash flows

$

384

(1)Undiscounted cash flows include billed and due receivables in the 2020 maturity.
(2)The present value of the lease payments will not equal the financing receivables balances in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position due to certain items, including IDCs, allowance for credit losses and residual values, which are included in the financing receivable balance, but are not included in the future lease payments. For a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to the financing receivables recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position at December 31, 2019, refer to note F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM.”

For further information on sales-type and direct financing leases, including guaranteed and unguaranteed residual values, refer to note F, “Financing Receivables, Receivables Purchased/Participated from IBM.”

Operating Leases

Equipment provided to clients under an operating lease is carried at cost within equipment under operating leases in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position and depreciated over the lease term using the straight-line method, generally ranging from one to four years. The depreciable base is the original cost of the equipment less the estimated residual value of the equipment at the end of the lease term. At December 31, 2019, the unguaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases was $84 million.

65

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

At commencement of an operating lease, IDCs are deferred. As lease payments are made, the company records financing revenue over the lease term. IDCs are amortized over the lease term on the same basis as lease income is recorded.

The following table provides a maturity analysis of the undiscounted lease payments due to IBM Credit on operating leases over the next four years and thereafter, at December 31, 2019:

(Dollars in millions)

Total

2020

$

128

2021

33

2022

4

2023

0

Thereafter

Total undiscounted cash flows

$

165

Assets under operating lease are tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The impairment test is based on undiscounted cash flows, and, if impaired, the asset is written down to fair value based on either discounted cash flows or appraised values. There were no material impairment losses incurred for equipment provided to clients under an operating lease for the year ended December 31, 2019. These assets are included in equipment under operating leases in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position.

NOTE E.F. FINANCING RECEIVABLES, RECEIVABLES PURCHASED/PARTICIPATED FROM IBM

Financing receivables consist of Client Financing leases, loans and installment payment plans to end-user clients as well as loans to IBM for terms up to seven years.clients. Assets financed are primarily IT products and services where IBM and the company have experience. Client Financing arrangements are priced to achieve a market yield. Financing receivables also include Commercial Financing, which generally consists of working capital financing to suppliers, distributors and resellers of IBM and OEM IT products and services. Payment terms for working capital financing receivables generally range from 30 to 90 days.

Notes Beginning in the second quarter of 2019 and continuing throughout the year, the company wound down the portion of its Commercial Financing operations that provides short-term working capital solutions for OEM information technology suppliers, distributors and resellers, which has resulted in a significant reduction of Commercial Financing receivables. The company had receivables of $0.6 billion and $8.5 billion relating to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)its OEM IT Commercial Financing operations for the periods ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. IBM Credit will continue to provide differentiated end-to-end financing solutions, including commercial financing in support of IBM partner relationships.

The company purchases interests in certain of IBM’s trade and other accounts receivable at a discountdiscount. In the second quarter of 2019, IBM and assumes the credit riskcompany suspended the program under which IBM Credit purchases an interest in IBM’s trade account receivables which has resulted in a reduction of IBM’s client. short-term purchased receivables from IBM. These receivables are primarily for IT-related products and services, which are due within 30 days, and IBM performs all servicing under these arrangements. These receivables are included within the Commercial Financing segment.

Beginning in 2016, the The company began participatingalso participates in receivables from IBM for certain long-term financing receivables generated from IBM’s Total Solution Offerings in certain countries as well as for certain government and other contracts. These receivables are included in the Client Financing segment.

The company assumescarries the credit risk of IBM’s clients for all purchased interests and participated in receivables from IBM.

66

Table of Contents

Investment in direct financing leases

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Gross lease payments receivable

 

$

5,462

 

$

5,985

 

Estimated residual value

 

627

 

602

 

Deferred initial direct costs

 

56

 

56

 

Unearned income

 

(411

)

(453

)

Allowance for credit losses

 

(62

)

(95

)

Net investment in direct financing leases

 

$

5,672

 

$

6,094

 

The scheduled maturities of minimum lease payments outstanding for capital leases at December 31, 2017, expressed as a percentage of the total, are approximately: 2018, 42 percent; 2019, 28 percent; 2020, 19 percent; 2021, 8 percent; and 2022 and beyond, 4 percent.

Client Financing loans and installment payment receivables

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Gross loan payments receivable

 

$

9,762

 

$

9,697

 

Deferred initial direct costs

 

73

 

67

 

Unearned income

 

(473

)

(489

)

Allowance for credit losses

 

(96

)

(125

)

Net Client Financing loans and installment payment receivables

 

$

9,267

 

$

9,150

 

Commercial Financing receivables

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Commercial financing receivables

 

$

11,142

 

$

9,458

 

Allowance for credit losses

 

(15

)

(21

)

Net Commercial Financing receivables

 

$

11,127

 

$

9,436

 

Purchased and participated receivables from IBM

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Short-term purchased receivables from IBM

 

$

1,466

 

$

1,496

 

Allowance for credit losses on purchased receivables

 

(25

)

(22

)

Long-term participated receivables from IBM

 

3,812

 

2,436

 

Allowance for credit losses on participated receivables

 

(14

)

(13

)

Net purchased and participated receivables from IBM

 

$

5,239

 

$

3,897

 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Client Loans and

Commercial

Installment

(Dollars in millions)

Investment in

Financing

Payments

At December 31, 2019:

    

Leases

    

Receivables

    

(Loans)

    

Total

Financing receivables, gross

$

4,626

$

3,400

$

9,566

$

17,592

Unearned income

(384)

(4)

(373)

(761)

Deferred initial direct costs

32

71

103

Recorded investment

$

4,274

$

3,396

$

9,264

$

16,934

Allowance for credit losses

(56)

(9)

(82)

(148)

Unguaranteed residual value

531

531

Guaranteed residual value

47

47

Total financing receivables, net

$

4,796

$

3,387

$

9,181

$

17,365

Client Loans and

Commercial

Installment

(Dollars in millions)

Investment in

Financing

Payments

At December 31, 2018:

    

Leases

    

Receivables

    

(Loans)

    

Total

Financing receivables, gross

$

5,120

$

11,422

$

9,694

$

26,236

Unearned income

(411)

(36)

(453)

(900)

Deferred initial direct costs

46

73

119

Recorded investment

$

4,755

$

11,386

$

9,314

$

25,455

Allowance for credit losses

(65)

(11)

(98)

(174)

Unguaranteed residual value

491

491

Guaranteed residual value

77

77

Total financing receivables, net

$

5,258

$

11,374

$

9,216

$

25,848

Purchased and participated receivables from IBM

(Dollars in millions)

    

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

Short-term purchased receivables from IBM

$

56

$

1,373

Allowance for credit losses

 

0

 

(4)

Total short-term purchased receivables from IBM, net

$

56

$

1,369

Long-term participated receivables from IBM

$

4,310

$

4,079

Allowance for credit losses

 

(7)

 

(14)

Total long-term participated receivables from IBM, net

$

4,303

$

4,065

Total purchased and participated receivables from IBM, net

$

4,359

$

5,433

The company utilizes certain of its financing receivables as collateral for non-recourse borrowings. Financing receivables pledged as collateral for borrowings were $773$1,062 million and $689$710 million at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.

The company did not have any financing receivables held for sale as of December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018.

Financing Receivables by Portfolio Segment

The following tables present Client Financingthe recorded investment in financing receivables on a gross basis, excluding the allowance for credit losses and residual value,participated receivables from IBM, by portfolio segment and by class, excluding Commercial Financing receivables, purchased receivables from IBM and other miscellaneous financing receivables at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018. Commercial Financing receivables and purchased receivables from IBM are excluded from the presentation of financing receivables by portfolio segment as they are short

67

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

term in nature and the current estimated risk of loss and resulting impact to the company’s financing results are not material. The company determines its allowance for credit losses based on three portfolio segments: lease receivables, loan receivables and participated receivables from IBM, and further segments the portfolio into three classes: Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific.

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

    

    

At December 31, 2017:

 

Americas

 

EMEA

 

Asia Pacific

 

Total

 

Financing receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2019:

Americas

EMEA

Asia Pacific

Total

Recorded investment

Lease receivables

 

$

3,593

 

$

662

 

$

852

 

$

5,107

 

  

$

3,160

  

$

710

  

$

404

  

$

4,274

Loan receivables

 

6,110

 

2,315

 

937

 

9,362

 

  

 

6,173

  

 

2,415

  

 

676

  

 

9,264

Participated receivables from IBM

 

744

 

1,525

 

1,543

 

3,812

 

717

1,671

1,922

4,310

Ending balance

 

$

10,447

 

$

4,502

 

$

3,332

 

$

18,282

 

$

10,049

$

4,796

$

3,003

$

17,848

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

10,388

 

$

4,463

 

$

3,312

 

$

18,163

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

59

 

$

39

 

$

20

 

$

118

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded investment collectively evaluated for impairment

$

9,957

$

4,770

$

2,993

$

17,720

Recorded investment individually evaluated for impairment

$

92

$

26

$

10

$

128

Allowance for credit losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance at January 1, 2017

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance at January 1, 2019

 

 

 

 

Lease receivables

 

$

38

 

$

2

 

$

55

 

$

95

 

  

$

38

  

$

17

  

$

10

  

$

65

Loan receivables

 

113

 

11

 

0

 

125

 

  

 

66

  

 

28

  

 

5

  

 

98

Participated receivables from IBM

 

8

 

3

 

2

 

13

 

  

 

3

  

 

8

  

 

3

  

 

14

Total

 

$

160

 

$

16

 

$

58

 

$

233

 

$

107

$

53

$

17

$

177

Write-offs

 

$

(42

)

$

(2

)

$

(33

)

$

(77

)

  

$

(14)

  

$

(10)

  

$

(4)

  

$

(29)

Recoveries

 

1

 

 

0

 

1

 

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

1

Provision

 

(7

)

27

 

(6

)

14

 

Provision/(benefit)

  

 

7

  

 

(6)

  

 

(2)

  

 

(2)

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

0

 

4

 

4

 

8

 

  

 

(1)

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

(1)

Other

 

(4

)

(2

)

(3

)

(8

)

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

0

  

 

0

Ending balance at December 31, 2017

 

$

107

 

$

43

 

$

21

 

$

172

 

Ending balance at December 31, 2019

$

98

$

36

$

11

$

146

Lease receivables

 

$

42

 

$

6

 

$

15

 

$

62

 

  

$

27

  

$

21

  

$

8

  

$

56

Loan receivables

 

$

57

 

$

34

 

$

4

 

$

96

 

  

$

68

  

$

12

  

$

2

  

$

82

Participated receivables from IBM

 

$

9

 

$

4

 

$

2

 

$

14

 

  

$

3

  

$

3

  

$

1

  

$

7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

49

 

$

14

 

$

5

 

$

67

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

59

 

$

30

 

$

17

 

$

105

 

Related allowance, collectively evaluated for impairment

$

23

$

11

$

3

$

36

Related allowance, individually evaluated for impairment

$

75

$

26

$

9

$

110

Write-offs of lease and loan receivables were $39$17 million and $37$11 million, respectively, in 2017. Provisions for credit losses recorded for loan receivables and participated receivables from IBM were $15 million and $1 million, respectively, in 2017.2019. Provisions for credit losses recorded for lease receivables and participated receivables from IBM were an addition of $5 million and a reductionrelease of $2$6 million, respectively, in 2017.2019.

The average recorded investment of impaired leases and loans for Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific was $96 million, $29 million and $12 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2019. Both interest income recognized and interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired leases and loans were immaterial for the year ended December 31, 2019.

68

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Dollars in millions)

    

    

    

    

At December 31, 2018:

Americas

EMEA

Asia Pacific

Total

Recorded investment

Lease receivables

$

3,433

  

$

687

  

$

635

  

$

4,755

Loan receivables

 

6,167

  

 

2,231

  

 

916

  

 

9,314

Participated receivables from IBM

735

1,627

1,717

4,079

Ending balance

$

10,335

$

4,545

$

3,268

$

18,147

Recorded investment collectively evaluated for impairment

$

10,239

$

4,505

$

3,254

$

17,998

Recorded investment individually evaluated for impairment

$

96

$

39

$

13

$

149

Allowance for credit losses

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Beginning balance at January 1, 2018

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

Lease receivables

$

42

  

$

6

  

$

15

  

$

62

Loan receivables

 

57

  

 

34

  

 

4

  

 

96

Participated receivables from IBM

  

 

9

  

 

4

  

 

2

  

 

14

Total

$

107

$

43

$

21

$

172

Write-offs

$

(6)

$

(1)

  

$

(8)

  

$

(16)

Recoveries

 

 

  

 

2

  

 

2

Provision

 

11

 

13

  

 

3

  

 

27

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

(6)

 

(3)

  

 

(1)

  

 

(10)

Other

 

1

 

1

  

 

1

  

 

2

Ending balance at December 31, 2018

$

107

$

53

$

17

$

177

Lease receivables

$

38

$

17

$

10

$

65

Loan receivables

$

66

$

28

$

5

$

98

Participated receivables from IBM

$

3

$

8

$

3

$

14

Related allowance, collectively evaluated for impairment

$

38

$

15

$

4

$

56

Related allowance, individually evaluated for impairment

$

69

$

38

$

13

$

120

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31, 2016:

 

Americas

 

EMEA

 

Asia Pacific

 

Total

 

Financing receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease receivables

 

$

3,693

 

$

798

 

$

1,098

 

$

5,588

 

Loan receivables

 

5,678

 

2,284

 

1,313

 

9,275

 

Participated receivables from IBM

 

479

 

1,061

 

896

 

2,436

 

Ending balance

 

$

9,850

 

$

4,142

 

$

3,307

 

$

17,299

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

9,755

 

$

4,132

 

$

3,251

 

$

17,139

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

95

 

$

10

 

$

55

 

$

160

 

Allowance for credit losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning balance at January 1, 2016

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lease receivables

 

$

52

 

$

16

 

$

143

 

$

211

 

Loan receivables

 

122

 

51

 

200

 

373

 

Total

 

$

174

 

$

68

 

$

343

 

$

584

 

Write-offs

 

$

(13

)

$

(19

)

$

(79

)

$

(111

)

Recoveries

 

2

 

0

 

 

2

 

Provision for credit losses

 

69

 

4

 

(16

)

57

 

Foreign currency translation adjustment

 

14

 

0

 

(17

)

(3

)

Other

 

(86

)

(37

)

(174

)

(297

)

Ending balance at December 31, 2016

 

$

160

 

$

16

 

$

58

 

$

233

 

Lease receivables

 

$

38

 

$

2

 

$

55

 

$

95

 

Loan receivables

 

$

113

 

$

11

 

$

0

 

$

125

 

Participated receivables from IBM

 

$

8

 

$

3

 

$

2

 

$

13

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Collectively evaluated for impairment

 

$

71

 

$

13

 

$

7

 

$

91

 

Individually evaluated for impairment

 

$

88

 

$

3

 

$

50

 

$

142

 

Write-offs of lease receivables and loan receivables were $78$13 million and $33$3 million, respectively, in 2016.2018. Provisions for credit losses recorded for lease receivables, loan receivables and participated receivables from IBM were $11$9 million, $34$6 million and $13$12 million, respectively, in 2016. 2018.

The amount reported in “Other,” inaverage recorded investment of impaired leases and loans for Americas, EMEA and Asia Pacific was $80 million, $39 million and $18 million, respectively, for the table above, which is primarilyyear ended December 31, 2018. Both interest income recognized and interest income recognized on a cash basis on impaired leases and loans reflectswere immaterial for the reduction in allowance for credit losses in 2016 associated with certain impaired receivables that were retained by IBM due to IBM’s ongoing collection efforts. For additional information, see note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

year ended December 31, 2018.

When determining the allowances, financing receivables are evaluated either on an individual or a collective basis. For individually evaluated receivables, the company determines the expected cash flowcompany’s policy on calculating allowance for the receivable and calculates an estimatecredit losses, refer to note A, “Significant Accounting Policies.”

69

Table of the potential loss and the probability of loss. For those accounts in which the loss is probable, the company records a specific reserve. In addition, the company records an unallocated reserve that is determined by applying a reserve rate to its different portfolios, excluding accounts that have been specifically reserved. This reserve rate is based upon credit rating, probability of default, term, characteristics (lease/loan) and loss history.

Contents

Financing Receivables on Non-Accrual Status

The following table presents the recorded investment in financing receivables which were on non-accrual status at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Financing receivables from IBM are short term receivables that the company considers collectable and without third party risk, as such, these receivables are not included in the non-accrual status reported.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Lease receivables

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

10

 

$

15

 

EMEA

 

13

 

2

 

Asia Pacific

 

2

 

11

 

Total lease receivables

 

$

26

 

$

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loan receivables

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

38

 

$

87

 

EMEA

 

58

 

5

 

Asia Pacific

 

3

 

1

 

Total loan receivables

 

$

99

 

$

93

 

Total receivables

 

$

124

 

$

121

 

Past Due Financing Receivables

There were noThe company considers a clients’ financing receivables past due when an installment is aged over 90 days. The following table summarizes the information about the recorded investment in lease and loan receivables and participated receivables from IBM, on non-accrual in 2017including recorded investments aged over 90 days and 2016.still accruing, billed invoices aged over 90 days and recorded investment not accruing.

Recorded

Billed

Recorded

Total

Recorded

Investment

Invoices

Investment

(Dollars in millions)

Recorded

Investment

> 90 Days and

> 90 Days and

Not

At December 31, 2019:

    

Investment

    

> 90 Days (1)

    

Accruing (1)

    

Accruing

    

Accruing (2)

Americas

$

3,160

$

179

$

143

$

10

$

37

EMEA

 

710

24

11

1

16

Asia Pacific

 

404

9

2

0

7

Total lease receivables

 

$

4,274

 

$

213

 

$

156

 

$

11

 

$

59

Americas

 

$

6,173

$

107

$

66

$

10

$

56

EMEA

 

2,415

51

3

1

51

Asia Pacific

 

676

3

1

0

2

Total loan receivables

 

$

9,264

 

$

161

 

$

69

 

$

11

 

$

110

Americas

 

$

717

$

8

$

8

$

1

$

0

EMEA

 

1,671

7

7

1

1

Asia Pacific

 

1,922

6

5

1

1

Total participated receivables from IBM

 

$

4,310

 

$

21

 

$

20

 

$

3

 

$

2

Total

 

$

17,848

 

$

394

 

$

245

 

$

25

 

$

171

(1)At a contract level, which includes total billed and unbilled amounts for financing receivables aged greater than 90 days.
(2)Of the recorded investment not accruing, $128 million is individually evaluated for impairment with a related allowance of $110 million.

70

Table of Contents

Impaired ReceivablesNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Recorded

Billed

Recorded

Total

Recorded

Investment

Invoices

Investment

(Dollars in millions)

Recorded

Investment

> 90 Days and

> 90 Days and

Not

At December 31, 2018:

    

Investment

    

> 90 Days (1)

    

Accruing (1)

    

Accruing

    

Accruing (2)

Americas

$

3,433

$

288

$

247

$

18

$

44

EMEA

 

687

24

9

1

15

Asia Pacific

 

635

29

19

2

11

Total lease receivables

 

$

4,755

 

$

341

 

$

275

 

$

21

 

$

70

Americas

 

$

6,167

$

217

$

161

$

22

$

61

EMEA

 

2,231

80

24

3

57

Asia Pacific

 

916

13

9

1

4

Total loan receivables

 

$

9,314

 

$

310

 

$

194

 

$

25

 

$

122

Americas

 

$

735

$

11

$

11

$

2

$

EMEA

 

1,627

9

4

1

5

Asia Pacific

 

1,717

Total participated receivables from IBM

 

$

4,079

 

$

20

 

$

15

 

$

3

 

$

5

Total

 

$

18,147

 

$

671

 

$

484

 

$

49

 

$

197

(1)At a contract level, which includes total billed and unbilled amounts for financing receivables aged greater than 90 days.
(2)Of the recorded investment not accruing, $149 million is individually evaluated for impairment with a related allowance of $120 million.

The company considers any receivable with an individually evaluated reserve as an impaired receivable based on current information and events. Depending on the level of impairment, receivables will also be placed on non-accrual status.

The following tables present impaired receivables.

 

 

At December 31, 2017

 

At December 31, 2016

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Recorded
Investment

 

Related
Allowance

 

Recorded
Investment

 

Related
Allowance

 

Americas

 

$

59

 

$

59

 

$

95

 

$

88

 

EMEA

 

39

 

30

 

10

 

3

 

Asia Pacific

 

20

 

17

 

55

 

50

 

Total

 

$

118

 

$

105

 

$

160

 

$

142

 

 

 

At December 31, 2017

 

At December 31, 2016

 

 

 

Average
Recorded
Investment

 

Interest
Income
Recognized

 

Interest
Income
Recognized on
Cash Basis

 

Average
Recorded
Investment

 

Interest
Income
Recognized

 

Interest
Income
Recognized on
Cash Basis

 

Americas

 

$

88

 

$

0

 

$

 

$

134

 

$

0

 

$

 

EMEA

 

16

 

0

 

 

50

 

0

 

 

Asia Pacific

 

39

 

0

 

 

272

 

0

 

 

Total

 

$

143

 

$

0

 

$

 

$

456

 

$

0

 

$

 

Credit Quality Indicators

The company’s credit quality indicators, which are based on rating agency data, publicly available information and information provided by clients, as well as other information, are reviewed periodically based on the relative level of risk. The resulting indicators are a numerical rating system that maps to Moody’s Investors Service credit ratings as shown below. The company uses information provided by Moody’s, where available, as one of many inputs in its determination of client credit ratings.

The following tables present the net recorded investment for each class of receivables, by credit quality indicator, at December 31, 20172019 and 2016.2018. Receivables with a credit quality indicator ranging from Aaa to Baa3 are considered

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

investment grade. At December 31, 2017, 58 percent of the portfolio was investment grade as compared to 54 percent at December 31, 2016. All others are considered non-investment grade. In certain circumstances, the company may mitigate credit risk through arrangements with third parties, including credit insurance, financial guarantees, or non-recourse borrowings. The credit quality indicators do not reflect these mitigation actions.actions that the company takes to transfer risk to third parties.

 

 

Lease Receivables

 

Loan Receivables

 

Participated Receivables from IBM

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Asia

 

 

 

 

 

Asia

 

 

 

 

 

Asia

 

At December 31, 2017:

 

Americas

 

EMEA

 

Pacific

 

Americas

 

EMEA

 

Pacific

 

Americas

 

EMEA

 

Pacific

 

Credit Ratings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aaa — Aa3

 

$

384

 

$

24

 

$

40

 

$

655

 

$

85

 

$

45

 

$

80

 

$

57

 

$

74

 

A1 — A3

 

786

 

93

 

367

 

1,340

 

324

 

409

 

163

 

217

 

676

 

Baa1 — Baa3

 

921

 

177

 

224

 

1,571

 

616

 

250

 

191

 

411

 

413

 

Ba1 — Ba2

 

681

 

218

 

115

 

1,160

 

756

 

129

 

141

 

505

 

213

 

Ba3 — B1

 

406

 

98

 

46

 

692

 

341

 

51

 

84

 

228

 

84

 

B2 — B3

 

326

 

39

 

36

 

555

 

135

 

40

 

67

 

90

 

66

 

Caa — D

 

47

 

6

 

9

 

80

 

23

 

10

 

10

 

15

 

16

 

Total

 

$

3,551

 

$

657

 

$

837

 

$

6,054

 

$

2,280

 

$

933

 

$

735

 

$

1,522

 

$

1,541

 

Lease Receivables

Loan Receivables

Participated Receivables from IBM

(Dollars in millions)

Asia

Asia

Asia

At December 31, 2019:

    

Americas

    

EMEA

    

Pacific

    

Americas

    

EMEA

    

Pacific

    

Americas

    

EMEA

    

Pacific

Credit Ratings:

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Aaa – Aa3

$

305

$

55

$

31

$

732

$

89

$

89

$

440

$

88

$

89

A1 – A3

 

700

 

88

 

124

 

1,166

 

178

 

237

 

71

 

271

 

934

Baa1 – Baa3

 

949

 

153

 

83

 

1,756

 

907

 

107

 

104

 

762

 

500

Ba1 – Ba2

 

733

 

206

 

61

 

1,461

 

532

 

159

 

49

 

442

 

245

Ba3 – B1

 

196

 

137

 

62

 

444

 

455

 

46

 

43

 

88

 

126

B2 – B3

 

236

 

45

 

32

 

513

 

228

 

33

 

4

 

18

 

26

Caa – D

 

13

 

5

 

2

 

32

 

15

 

3

 

2

 

0

 

2

Total

$

3,133

$

689

$

396

$

6,105

$

2,403

$

674

$

714

$

1,668

$

1,921

 

 

Lease Receivables

 

Loan Receivables

 

Participated Receivables from IBM

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

Asia

 

 

 

 

 

Asia

 

 

 

 

 

Asia

 

At December 31, 2016:

 

Americas

 

EMEA

 

Pacific

 

Americas

 

EMEA

 

Pacific

 

Americas

 

EMEA

 

Pacific

 

Credit Ratings:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aaa — Aa3

 

$

432

 

$

35

 

$

44

 

$

658

 

$

99

 

$

55

 

$

56

 

$

46

 

$

38

 

A1 — A3

 

757

 

77

 

403

 

1,152

 

220

 

507

 

97

 

102

 

345

 

Baa1 — Baa3

 

747

 

250

 

273

 

1,137

 

713

 

344

 

96

 

332

 

234

 

Ba1 — Ba2

 

796

 

239

 

153

 

1,211

 

682

 

193

 

102

 

317

 

131

 

Ba3 — B1

 

555

 

141

 

88

 

845

 

404

 

111

 

71

 

188

 

76

 

B2 — B3

 

287

 

48

 

69

 

437

 

139

 

87

 

37

 

64

 

60

 

Caa — D

 

81

 

6

 

12

 

123

 

17

 

15

 

10

 

8

 

10

 

Total

 

$

3,655

 

$

796

 

$

1,042

 

$

5,565

 

$

2,273

 

$

1,313

 

$

471

 

$

1,058

 

$

894

 

71

Table of Contents

Past Due Financing Receivables

The company considers financing receivables past due when any installment is over 90 days past due. The following table summarizes receivables by aging category, where fully reserved receivables are excluded. The past due aging categories represent only the portion of a financing receivable which is past due. Current financing receivables represent total financing receivables excluding receivables which are past due for greater than 90 days and fully reserved receivables. Financing receivables past due for greater than 90 days and accruing represent the total billed and unbilled value at a contract level for receivables with outstanding installments greater than 90 days past due. Payments are received monthly from IBM for receivables participated in by IBM Credit. For participated receivables past due over 90 days, amounts collected from IBM associated with the amounts past due over 90 days and unpaid by the end-user client are returned to IBM. Amounts returned to IBM during the periods reported were not material.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Lease Receivables

Loan Receivables

Participated Receivables from IBM

(Dollars in millions)

Asia

Asia

Asia

At December 31, 2018

    

Americas

    

EMEA

    

Pacific

    

Americas

    

EMEA

    

Pacific

    

Americas

    

EMEA

    

Pacific

Credit Ratings:

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

Aaa – Aa3

$

520

$

24

$

49

$

935

$

79

$

71

$

112

$

58

$

134

A1 – A3

 

617

 

82

 

241

 

1,108

 

269

 

351

 

133

 

198

 

659

Baa1 – Baa3

 

807

 

214

 

169

 

1,450

 

704

 

246

 

174

 

517

 

463

Ba1 – Ba2

 

772

 

207

 

102

 

1,387

 

681

 

149

 

167

 

500

 

280

Ba3 – B1

 

391

 

90

 

36

 

703

 

297

 

52

 

84

 

218

 

99

B2 – B3

 

264

 

47

 

26

 

475

 

156

 

37

 

57

 

114

 

70

Caa – D

 

23

 

5

 

3

 

42

 

17

 

5

 

5

 

12

 

9

Total

$

3,395

$

670

$

625

$

6,101

$

2,204

$

912

$

733

$

1,618

$

1,714

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded

 

 

 

Total

 

Total

 

Total

 

Current

 

Total

 

Investment

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Past Due

 

Past Due

 

Past Due

 

Financing

 

Financing

 

> 90 days and

 

At December 31, 2017

 

31-60 days 1

 

61-90 days 1

 

> 90 days 1

 

Receivables

 

Receivables

 

accruing 2

 

Lease receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

18

 

$

10

 

$

27

 

$

3,554

 

$

3,593

 

$

185

 

EMEA

 

3

 

1

 

3

 

656

 

662

 

5

 

Asia Pacific

 

0

 

0

 

1

 

836

 

852

 

4

 

Total lease receivables

 

$

21

 

$

12

 

$

32

 

$

5,046

 

$

5,107

 

$

194

 

Loan receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

22

 

$

13

 

$

37

 

$

6,029

 

$

6,110

 

$

237

 

EMEA

 

10

 

5

 

12

 

2,283

 

2,315

 

17

 

Asia Pacific

 

0

 

0

 

2

 

934

 

937

 

4

 

Total loan receivables

 

$

33

 

$

18

 

$

51

 

$

9,245

 

$

9,362

 

$

258

 

Participated receivables from IBM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

N/A

 

$

N/A

 

$

3

 

$

741

 

$

744

 

$

11

 

EMEA

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

1

 

1,525

 

1,525

 

1

 

Asia Pacific

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

0

 

1,543

 

1,543

 

0

 

Total participated receivables from IBM

 

$

N/A

 

$

N/A

 

$

4

 

$

3,808

 

$

3,812

 

$

12

 

Total receivables

 

$

54

 

$

29

 

$

87

 

$

18,100

 

$

18,282

 

$

464

 


(1) Only the portion of a financing receivable which is past due, excluding amounts that are fully reserved.

(2) At a contract level, which includes total billed and unbilled amounts for aged financing receivables greater than 90 days.

N/A - Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Recorded

 

 

 

Total

 

Total

 

Total

 

Current

 

Total

 

Investment

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Past Due

 

Past Due

 

Past Due

 

Financing

 

Financing

 

> 90 days and

 

At December 31, 2016

 

31-60 days 1

 

61-90 days 1

 

> 90 days 1

 

Receivables

 

Receivables

 

accruing 2

 

Lease receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

9

 

$

4

 

$

8

 

$

3,666

 

$

3,693

 

$

37

 

EMEA

 

3

 

2

 

2

 

790

 

798

 

6

 

Asia Pacific

 

1

 

1

 

11

 

1,041

 

1,098

 

37

 

Total lease receivables

 

$

13

 

$

7

 

$

20

 

$

5,497

 

$

5,588

 

$

80

 

Loan receivables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

15

 

$

7

 

$

12

 

$

5,639

 

$

5,678

 

$

57

 

EMEA

 

8

 

5

 

5

 

2,273

 

2,284

 

14

 

Asia Pacific

 

 

 

4

 

1,308

 

1,313

 

42

 

Total loan receivables

 

$

23

 

$

12

 

$

20

 

$

9,220

 

$

9,275

 

$

113

 

Participated receivables from IBM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Americas

 

$

N/A

 

$

N/A

 

$

 

$

479

 

$

479

 

$

 

EMEA

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

1,061

 

1,061

 

 

Asia Pacific

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

896

 

896

 

 

Total participated receivables from IBM

 

$

N/A

 

$

N/A

 

$

 

$

2,436

 

$

2,436

 

$

 

Total receivables

 

$

36

 

$

18

 

$

41

 

$

17,152

 

$

17,299

 

$

195

 


(1) Only the portion of a financing receivable which is past due, excluding amounts that are fully reserved.

(2) At a contract level, which includes total billed and unbilled amounts for aged financing receivables greater than 90 days.

N/A - Not applicable

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The company did not have any significant troubled debt restructurings for the years ended December 31, 20172019, 2018 and 2016.2017.

NOTE F. OTHER ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Deferred taxes

 

$

121

 

$

133

 

Other receivables

 

114

 

136

 

Prepaid taxes

 

79

 

33

 

Derivatives

 

3

 

115

 

Other

 

47

 

11

 

Total

 

$

364

 

$

428

 

NOTE G. BORROWINGSOTHER ASSETS

(Dollars in millions)

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

Deferred taxes

$

142

$

120

Other receivables

42

104

Prepaid taxes

 

94

 

95

Derivatives

 

45

 

18

Other

 

84

 

35

Total

$

406

$

373

NOTE H. BORROWINGS

The company may, at times, pledge financing receivables as collateral for non-recourse short-termshort- and long-term borrowings. The amount of such non-recourse borrowings are reflected in the short-termshort- and long-term debt tables below.

Short-Term Debt

 

At December 31,

 

At December 31,

 

At December 31, 

At December 31, 

(Dollars in millions)

 

2017

 

2016

 

 

2019

    

2018

Commercial paper

 

$

1,496

 

$

 

$

304

$

2,995

Short-term loans

 

60

 

36

 

49

17

Secured borrowings

 

12

 

8

 

280

23

Debt

 

$

1,568

 

$

44

 

$

633

$

3,035

Debt payable to IBM

 

15,159

 

16,481

 

 

8,194

 

10,223

Total

 

$

16,727

 

$

16,525

 

$

8,827

$

13,258

The weighted-average interest rate for short-term loans was 2.4 percent and 14.1 percent at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and relates primarily to borrowings in Asia Pacific in 2017 and in Latin America in 2016.

The weighted-average interest rate for secured borrowings was 4.7 percent and 3.9 percent at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Short-term financing receivables pledged as collateral for short-term secured borrowings were $12 million at December 31, 2017 and $8 million at December 31, 2016.

The weighted-average interest rate for debt payable to IBM was 1.1 percent and 0.8 percent at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In August 2017, IBM Credit establishedmaintains a commercial paper program under which the company is permitted to issue unsecured commercial paper notes from time to time, up to a maximum aggregate amount outstanding at any one time of $5 billion. The proceeds of the commercial paper can be used for general corporate purposes, including, among other items, the repayment of indebtedness and other short-term liquidity needs. The maturity of the commercial paper notes issued can vary but may not exceed 364 days from the date of issuance. The notes are sold under customary terms in the commercial paper marketplace, and can be issued either at a discount from par or at par, and bear interest rates as agreed upon under the terms and conditions of the agreements between the company and each commercial paper dealer.

72

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

At December 31, 2017, there was $1,496 million of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for commercial paper was 1.51.6 percent and 2.5 percent at December 31, 2017.2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

The weighted-average interest rate for short-term loans was 5.2 percent and 4.3 percent at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, and relates primarily to borrowings in North America.

The weighted-average interest rate for secured borrowings was 3.6 percent and 6.9 percent at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Short-term financing receivables pledged as collateral for short-term secured borrowings were $280 million at December 31, 2019 and $23 million at December 31, 2018.

The weighted-average interest rate for debt payable to IBM was 1.6 percent in each period of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Long-Term Debt

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)Pre-Swap Borrowing

Long-Term Debt

Pre-Swap Borrowing

 

 

 

 

Balance

 

Balance

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Maturities

 

12/31/2017

 

12/31/2016

 

Long-term notes (average interest rate at December 31, 2017)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1.6%

 

2019

 

$

1,400

 

$

 

1.7%

 

2021

 

1,100

 

 

2.2%

 

2022

 

500

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

3,000

 

$

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-term loans (5.9% average interest rate at December 31, 2017)

 

2018-2020

 

486

 

 

Secured borrowings (4.6% average interest rate at December 31, 2017)

 

2018-2023

 

762

 

681

 

Long-term debt

 

 

 

$

4,248

 

$

681

 

Less: net unamortized discount

 

 

 

1

 

 

Less: net unamortized debt issuance costs

 

 

 

9

 

 

Less: fair value adjustment*

 

 

 

26

 

 

Debt

 

 

 

$

4,211

 

$

681

 

Debt payable to IBM (1.1% average interest rate at December 31, 2017)

 

 

 

9,539

 

9,824

 

Total

 

 

 

$

13,750

 

$

10,505

 

    

    

Balance

    

Balance

(Dollars in millions)

 

Maturities

12/31/2019

 

12/31/2018

Long-term notes (weighted-average interest rate at December 31, 2019)

2.2%

2019

$

$

1,400

2.9%

2020

1,500

1,500

2.5%

2021

2,850

2,850

2.2%

2022

500

500

3.0%

2023

750

750

$

5,600

$

7,000

Long-term loans (5.4% weighted-average interest rate at December 31, 2019)

2020-2021

113

276

Secured borrowings (5.2% weighted-average interest rate at December 31, 2019)

2020-2025

781

687

Long-term debt

$

6,495

$

7,964

Less: net unamortized discount

1

2

Less: net unamortized debt issuance costs

5

9

Add: fair value adjustment*

28

(34)

Debt

$

6,517

$

7,919

Debt payable to IBM (1.5% weighted-average interest rate at December 31, 2019)

 

8,751

 

9,357

Total

$

15,268

$

17,276


*   The portion of the company’s fixed-rate debt obligations that is hedged is reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as an amount equal to the sum of the debt’s carrying value and a fair value adjustment representing changes in the fair value of the hedged debt obligations attributable to movements in benchmark interest rates.

*

The portion of the company's fixed-rate debt obligations that is hedged is reflected in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as an amount equal to the sum of the debt's carrying value and a fair value adjustment representing changes in the fair value of the hedged debt obligations attributable to movements in benchmark interest rates.

The company utilizes certain of its financing receivables as collateral. Long-term financing receivables pledged as collateral for long-term secured borrowings were $762$781 million at December 31, 20172019 and $681$687 million at December 31, 2016,2018, and relate primarily to borrowings in the U.S.North America and Latin America.

In August 2017, theThe company filedhas a shelf registration statement in place with the SEC allowing it to offer for sale public debt securities. The company issued fixed ratefixed- and floating-rate debt securities in September 2017 in the aggregate amount of $3,000 million with maturity dates ranging from 2019 to 2022. During 2018, the company issued fixed- and floating-rate debt securities in the aggregate amount of $1,800$4,000 million with ratesmaturity dates ranging from 1.625 percent2020 to 2.200 percent and floating rate2023. There were 0 issuances of debt securities in the aggregate amount of $1,200 million with rates of LIBOR plus 15 or 26 basis points. The maturity dates of the debt securities issued range from 2019 to 2022.2019. The net proceeds to the company from the issuance after adjusting for and deducting related discounts, commissions and expenses of approximately $7 million,debt securities are being utilized for general corporate purposes. The interest rates, maturities and amounts of theThis debt securities issued by the company are providedis included in the long-term debt table presented above.

73

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

The company’s indenture governing its debt securities contains significant covenants which obligate the company to promptly pay principal and interest, limit the aggregate amount of liens (other than permitted liens) to 15 percent of the company’s consolidated net tangible assets, and restrict the company’s ability to merge or consolidate unless certain conditions are met.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Post Swap Borrowing (Long-Term Debt)

($ in millions)

 

2017

 

2016

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

Amount

 

Average Rate

 

Amount

 

Average Rate

 

Fixed-rate debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt

 

$

736

 

3.2

%

$

681

 

6.8

%

Debt payable to IBM

 

9,458

 

1.1

%

9,762

 

1.0

%

Total fixed-rate debt

 

$

10,195

 

 

 

$

10,443

 

 

 

Floating-rate debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt*

 

$

3,475

 

2.6

%

$

 

%

Debt payable to IBM

 

80

 

(0.3

)%

62

 

(0.3

)%

Total floating-rate debt

 

$

3,555

 

 

 

$

62

 

 

 

Total debt

 

$

4,211

 

 

 

$

681

 

 

 

Total debt payable to IBM

 

9,539

 

 

 

9,824

 

 

 

Total

 

$

13,750

 

 

 

$

10,505

 

 

 

2019

2018

 

Weighted-Average

Weighted-Average

(Dollars in millions)

Interest

Interest

For the year ended December 31:

    

Amount

    

Rate

    

Amount

    

Rate

 

Fixed-rate debt

Debt

$

1,846

3.8

%

$

1,967

 

3.9

%

Debt payable to IBM

8,676

1.5

%

9,281

1.3

%

Total fixed-rate debt

$

10,521

$

11,248

Floating-rate debt

Debt*

$

4,671

2.5

%

$

5,952

3.1

%

Debt payable to IBM

75

(0.4)

%

77

(0.3)

%

Total floating-rate debt

$

4,746

$

6,028

Total debt

$

6,517

$

7,919

Total debt payable to IBM

8,751

9,357

Total

$

15,268

$

17,276

 

  


* Includes $1,800 million in 2017 of notional interest rate swaps that effectively convert fixed-rated long-term debt into floating-rate long-term debt (see note D, “Financial Instruments.”)

*

Includes $2,550 million in 2019 and $3,350 million in 2018 of notional interest rate swaps that effectively convert fixed-rated long-term debt into floating-rate long-term debt. (See note D, "Financial Instruments," for additional information.)

Pre-swap annual contractual maturitiesobligations of long-term debt and long-term debt payable to IBM outstanding at December 31, 20172019 are as follows:

2025 and

(Dollars in millions)

 

2018

 

2019

 

2020

 

2021

 

2022

 

2023 and
beyond

 

Total

 

    

2020

    

2021

    

2022

    

2023

    

2024

    

beyond

    

Total

Long-term debt

 

$

610

 

$

1,873

 

$

120

 

$

1,143

 

$

502

 

$

0

 

$

4,248

 

$

1,986

$

3,151

$

591

$

764

$

2

$

0

$

6,495

Debt payable to IBM

 

4,614

 

2,284

 

1,861

 

614

 

160

 

6

 

9,539

 

 

3,961

 

2,484

 

1,362

 

679

 

200

 

65

 

8,751

Total

 

$

5,224

 

$

4,157

 

$

1,981

 

$

1,757

 

$

661

 

$

6

 

$

13,786

 

$

5,947

$

5,635

$

1,953

$

1,443

$

202

$

65

$

15,246

Interest on Debt

The company recognized interest expense of $362$499 million, $364$503 million and $466$362 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively, of which $265$242 million, $301$298 million and $425$265 million was interest expense on debt payable to IBM, respectively.

Lines of Credit

The company has committed lines of credit in some of the geographies which are not significant in the aggregate. Interest rates and other terms of borrowing under these lines of credit vary from country to country, depending on local market conditions.

On July 20, 2017,18, 2019, IBM and the company (the(together, the Borrowers) entered into a new $2.5 billion, 364-Day Credit Agreement to replace the maturing $2.5 billion, 364-Day Credit Agreement,agreement, and aalso amended the existing $2.5 billion Three-Year Credit Agreement (the(together, the Credit Agreements). The new maturity date for the Three-Year Agreement is July 20, 2022. The facility size remains unchanged. The Credit Agreements permit the Borrowers to borrow up to an aggregate of $5 billion on a revolving basis. Neither Borrower is a guarantor or co-obligor of the other Borrower under the Credit Agreements. Subject to certain conditions stated in the Credit Agreements, the Borrowers may borrow, prepay

74

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

and re-borrow amounts under the Credit Agreements at any time during the term of the Credit Agreements. Funds borrowed may be used for the general corporate purposes of the Borrowers. Interest rates on borrowings under the Credit Agreements will be based on prevailing market interest rates, as further described in the Credit Agreements. The Credit Agreements contain customary representations and warranties, covenants, events of default, and indemnification provisions. As of December 31, 2017, there were no2019, the company had 0 borrowings underoutstanding against the Credit Agreements. The company incurred charges of $1.9$1.6 million in 20172019 and $1.4 million in 2018 related to the Credit Agreements.

These charges are recorded as financing cost in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings.

The company’s Credit Agreements each contain significant debt covenants, which obligate the company to promptly pay principal and interest, limit the aggregate amount of secured indebtedness and sale and leaseback transactions to 10 percent of IBM’s consolidated net tangible assets, and restrict the ability of the company or IBM to merge or consolidate with a third

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

party unless certain conditions are met. The Credit Agreements also include several financial covenants, including that (i) IBM will not permit the consolidated net interest expense ratio, for any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters taken as a single accounting period, to be less than 2.20 to 1.0; (ii) the company will not permit its tangible net worth to be less than $50 million as of the end of the fiscal year and (ii)(iii) the company’s leverage ratio cannot be greater than 11 to 1 as of the last day of the each fiscal quarter. The Credit Agreements each contain a cross default provision with respect to other defaulted indebtedness of at least $500 million.

The company is in compliance with all of its significant debt covenants, and is obligated to provide periodic certifications to its lenders. The failure to comply with its debt covenants could constitute an event of default. If certain events of default were to occur, the principal and interest on the debt to which any event of default applied would become immediately due and payable. The Borrowers are also restricted from amending, modifying or terminating the Support Agreement in any manner materially adverse to the lenders. For additional information regarding the Support Agreement, see note C, “Relationship with IBM and Related Party Transactions.”

NOTE H. OTHER LIABILITIES

($ in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Post-retirement Benefits and Accrued Compensation

 

$

70

 

$

61

 

Deferred Income

 

62

 

50

 

Derivatives

 

56

 

97

 

Accrued Interest

 

45

 

0

 

Other

 

36

 

20

 

Total

 

$

269

 

$

228

 

NOTE I. OTHER LIABILITIES

(Dollars in millions)

    

    

 

At December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

Post-retirement Benefits and Accrued Compensation

$

85

$

67

Deferred Income

 

36

 

26

Derivatives

18

37

Accrued Interest

54

68

Other

 

31

 

48

Total

$

224

$

246

75

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE J. EQUITY ACTIVITY

IBM Credit had no0 available-for-sale securities and no0 unrealized gains or (losses) on cash flow hedges during the periods presented in the following tables:

Reclassifications and Taxes Related to Items of Other Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Before Tax

 

Tax (Expense)/

 

Net of Tax

 

For the year ended December 31, 2017:

 

Amount

 

Benefit

 

Amount

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

$

363

 

$

2

 

$

365

 

Retirement-related benefit plans (1):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (losses)/gains arising during the period

 

2

 

(1

)

2

 

Curtailments and settlements

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

Amortization of prior service (credits)/costs

 

(1

)

0

 

(1

)

Amortization of net (gains)/losses

 

1

 

0

 

1

 

Total retirement-related benefit plans

 

$

3

 

$

(1

)

$

2

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

$

366

 

$

2

 

$

367

 

(Dollars in millions)

Before Tax

Tax (Expense)/

Net of Tax

For the year ended December 31, 2019:

Amount

    

Benefit

    

Amount

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

  

Foreign currency translation adjustments

  

$

14

$

(3)

$

11

Retirement-related benefit plans (1):

  

Net (losses)/gains arising during the period

$

(14)

$

4

$

(10)

Curtailments and settlements

 

0

0

0

Amortization of prior service (credits)/costs

 

0

0

0

Amortization of net (gains)/losses

 

2

(1)

1

Total retirement-related benefit plans

  

$

(12)

$

3

$

(9)

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

$

1

$

1

$

2


(1) 

(1)These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. (See note M, "Retirement-Related Benefits," for additional information.)

(Dollars in millions)

Before Tax

Tax (Expense)/

Net of Tax

For the year ended December 31, 2018:

    

Amount

    

Benefit

    

Amount

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

Foreign currency translation adjustments

$

(151)

$

(32)

$

(184)

Retirement-related benefit plans (1):

Net (losses)/gains arising during the period

$

(4)

$

1

$

(3)

Curtailments and settlements

 

0

0

0

Amortization of prior service (credits)/costs

(1)

0

(1)

Amortization of net (gains)/losses

1

0

1

Total retirement-related benefit plans

$

(4)

$

1

$

(3)

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

$

(155)

$

(31)

$

(186)

(1)These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. (See note M, "Retirement-Related Benefits,” for additional information.)

(Dollars in millions)

Before Tax

Tax (Expense)/

Net of Tax

For the year ended December 31, 2017:

    

Amount

    

Benefit

    

Amount

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

  

Foreign currency translation adjustments

$

363

  

$

2

$

365

Retirement-related benefit plans (1):

Net (losses)/gains arising during the period

$

2

  

$

(1)

$

2

Curtailments and settlements

 

0

0

0

Amortization of prior service (credits)/costs

 

(1)

  

 

0

 

(1)

Amortization of net (gains)/losses

 

1

  

 

0

 

1

Total retirement-related benefit plans

$

3

$

(1)

$

2

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

$

366

$

2

$

367

(1)These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. (See note M, “Retirement-Related Benefits,” for additional information.)

76

Table of net periodic pension cost. (See note L, “Retirement-Related Benefits,” for additional information.)Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Reclassifications and Taxes Related to Items of Other Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Before Tax

 

Tax (Expense)/

 

Net of Tax

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016:

 

Amount

 

Benefit

 

Amount

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

$

16

 

$

 

$

16

 

Retirement-related benefit plans 1:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (losses)/gains arising during the period

 

(1

)

0

 

(1

)

Amortization of net (gains)/losses

 

1

 

0

 

1

 

Total retirement-related benefit plans

 

$

(1

)

$

0

 

$

(1

)

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

$

15

 

$

0

 

$

15

 


(1) These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. (See note L, “Retirement-Related Benefits,” for additional information.)

Reclassifications and Taxes Related to Items of Other Comprehensive Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Before Tax

 

Tax (Expense)/

 

Net of Tax

 

For the year ended December 31, 2015:

 

Amount

 

Benefit

 

Amount

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 

$

(158

)

$

 

$

(158

)

Retirement-related benefit plans 1:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net (losses)/gains arising during the period

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

Amortization of net (gains)/losses

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

Total retirement-related benefit plans

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

$

0

 

Other comprehensive income/(loss)

 

$

(158

)

$

0

 

$

(158

)


(1) These AOCI components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. (See note L, “Retirement-Related Benefits,” for additional information.)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) (net of tax)

 

 

 

 

Net Change

 

 

 

 

 

Foreign

 

Retirement-

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Currency

 

Related

 

Other

 

 

 

Translation

 

Benefit

 

Comprehensive

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Adjustments*

 

Plans

 

Income/(Loss)

 

December 31, 2014

 

$

(57

)

$

(9

)

$

(66

)

Other comprehensive income before reclassification

 

(158

)

0

 

(158

)

Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

Total change for the period

 

(158

)

0

 

(158

)

December 31, 2015

 

(216

)

(9

)

(224

)

Other comprehensive income before reclassification

 

16

 

(1

)

15

 

Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

Total change for the period

 

16

 

(1

)

15

 

December 31, 2016

 

(200

)

(9

)

(209

)

Other comprehensive income before reclassification

 

365

 

2

 

367

 

Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

 

0

 

0

 

0

 

Total change for the period

 

365

 

2

 

367

 

December 31, 2017

 

$

165

 

$

(7

)

$

158

 

 

Net Change

 

Foreign

 

Retirement-

 

Accumulated

 

Currency

 

Related

 

Other

 

Translation

 

Benefit

 

Comprehensive

(Dollars in millions)

    

Adjustments*

    

Plans

    

Income/(Loss)

December 31, 2016

 

$

(200)

 

$

(9)

 

$

(209)

Other comprehensive income before reclassification

365

2

367

Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

0

0

0

Total change for the period

365

2

367

December 31, 2017

165

(7)

158

Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle**

(5)

(5)

Other comprehensive income before reclassification

(184)

(3)

(187)

Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

1

1

Total change for the period

(184)

(3)

(186)

December 31, 2018

(23)

(10)

(33)

Other comprehensive income before reclassification

11

(10)

1

Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income

1

1

Total change for the period

11

(9)

2

December 31, 2019

 

$

(12)

 

$

(19)

 

$

(31)


*     Foreign currency translation adjustments are presented gross except for any associated hedges which are presented net of tax.

**   Reflects the adoption of the FASB guidance on stranded tax effects. Refer to note B, “Accounting Changes.”

NOTE J.K. CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS

Contingencies

The company is or may be involved in a variety of ongoing claims, demands, suits, investigations, tax matters and proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of its business. Certain of these actions and proceedings are similar to suits filed against other financial institutions and captive finance companies. These include collection and bankruptcy proceedings related to itsthe company’s leases and loans and proceedings concerning client allegations of wrongful repossession or defamation of credit.

In accordance with the relevant accounting guidance, the company provides disclosures of matters for which the likelihood of material loss is at least reasonably possible. In addition, the company also discloses matters based on its consideration of other matters and qualitative factors, including the experience of other companies in the industry, and investor, client and employee relations considerations.

The company records a provision with respect to a claim, suit, investigation or proceeding when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The company reviews claims, suits, investigations and proceedings at least quarterly, and decisions are made with respect to recording or adjusting provisions and disclosing reasonably possible losses. As of December 31, 2017,2019, there were no matters for which the likelihood of material loss is at least reasonably possible.

Commitments

The company’s extended lines of credit to third-party entities include unused amounts of $7,755 million$1.8 billion and $6,174 million$7.1 billion at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. These amounts were available to the company’s Commercial Financing suppliers, distributors and resellers to support additional loan advances, or purchases of factored receivables, to meet their working capital liquidity needs. The decrease reflects the company’s wind down of its OEM IT Commercial Financing operations. In addition, the company has committed to provide future financing to its clients in connection with client purchase agreements for approximately $749 million$5.4 billion and $404 million$0.5 billion at December 31, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. In the

77

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

fourth quarter of 2019, the purchase of receivables and participation agreements between IBM and the company were amended to closer align the future funding commitments of the company with those of IBM.

NOTE L. TAXES

(Dollars in millions)

    

    

    

 

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Income/(loss) before income taxes:

U.S. operations

$

(71)

$

(156)

 

$

41

Non-U.S. operations

690

 

886

 

 

713

Total income before income taxes

$

619

$

731

 

$

755

NOTE K. TAXES

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. operations

 

$

41

 

$

259

 

$

338

 

Non-U.S. operations

 

713

 

460

 

445

 

Total income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

$

755

 

$

719

 

$

783

 

The income from continuing operations provision for income taxes by geographic operations is as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

    

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2019

2018

2017

Continuing operations provision for/(benefit from) income taxes:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Provision for/(benefit from) income taxes:

U.S. operations

 

$

(151

)

$

100

 

$

132

 

$

51

$

(50)

 

$

(151)

Non-U.S. operations

 

156

 

122

 

179

 

 

137

 

184

 

 

156

Total continuing operations provision for income taxes

 

$

5

 

$

222

 

$

311

 

Total provision for income taxes

$

188

$

133

 

$

5

The components of the income from continuing operations provision for income taxes/(benefits) by taxing jurisdiction are as follows:

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    

    

    

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

2019

2018

2017

U.S. federal:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

(110

)

$

156

 

$

162

 

$

(9)

$

(91)

 

$

(110)

Deferred

 

(40

)

(73

)

(52

)

 

65

 

46

 

 

(40)

Total

 

$

(150

)

$

83

 

$

109

 

$

56

$

(45)

 

$

(150)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. state and local:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

(21

)

$

32

 

$

33

 

$

(28)

$

(21)

 

$

(21)

Deferred

 

18

 

(15

)

(11

)

 

21

 

13

 

 

18

Total

 

$

(3

)

$

17

 

$

22

 

$

(7)

$

(8)

 

$

(3)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-U.S.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Current

 

$

122

 

$

176

 

$

237

 

$

158

$

194

 

$

122

Deferred

 

36

 

(55

)

(58

)

 

(18)

 

(7)

 

 

36

Total

 

$

158

 

$

122

 

$

179

 

$

139

$

186

 

$

158

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total continuing operations provision for income taxes

 

$

5

 

$

222

 

$

311

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Discontinued operations provision for income taxes

 

$

 

$

85

 

$

166

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total taxes included in net income

 

$

5

 

$

307

 

$

477

 

Total provision for income taxes

$

188

$

133

 

$

5

If the company’s provision for income taxes had been prepared using the separate tax return method without modification for the benefits-for-loss approach, theretotal taxes included in net income reported for 2019 and 2018 would have been $52 million higher for 2019 and $24 million higher for 2018 as a result of the difference in the calculation of the GILTI provision. There would be no material difference in the total taxes included in net income reported in each of the years above.year 2017. For additional information, refer to note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

For the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, the U.S. operations generated a taxable loss as a result of the effect of temporary differences between asset and liability amounts that are recognized for financial reporting purposes and the amounts that are recognized for income tax purposes.loss. As the company’s U.S. federal and certain state operations are included in various IBM

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

consolidated tax returns, under the tax sharing agreement,Tax Sharing Agreement, the benefits-for-loss approach has been applied and the losses were recorded as a current tax receivable due from IBM to be settled during the first quarter of 2018.2020.

78

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax rate to the company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations is as follows:

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

 

Statutory rate

 

35

%

35

%

35

%

 

21

%  

21

%  

35

%

U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act

 

(21

)

 

 

Foreign tax differential

 

(14

)

(5

)

(5

)

Enactment of U.S. tax reform

19

(2)

(21)

Tax differential on foreign income

 

(6)

1

(14)

State and local

 

0

 

2

 

2

 

 

(1)

(1)

0

Valuation allowance

 

1

 

(1

)

8

 

 

(2)

(1)

1

Effective rate on continuing operations

 

1

%

31

%

40

%

Effective rate

 

31

%  

18

%  

1

%

Percentages rounded for disclosure purposes.

The componentvarious components reflected within the tax rate reconciliation table above labeled “Foreign tax differential” includes“Tax differential on foreign income” include the effects of foreign subsidiaries’ earnings taxed at rates other than the U.S. statutory rate.

rate and U.S. taxes on foreign income. This line item also reflects the changes in the amount of unrecognized tax benefits associated with each of those components.

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was enacted. U.S. tax reform introduced many changes, including lowering the U.S. corporate income tax rate to 21 percent, allowing for full expensing for investments in certain property placed in service after September 27, 2017 and before January 1, 2023, changes in incentives, provisions to prevent U.S. base erosion and significant changes in the taxation of international income, including provisions which allow for the repatriation of foreign earnings without U.S. tax. The enactment of U.S. tax reform resulted in the company recording a provisional one-time net benefit of $162 millioncharge to tax expense inof $116 million and net benefits of $7 million and $162 million for the fourth-quarter and yearyears ended December 31, 2017. This2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. In 2019, the charge was related to additional tax reform guidance issued by the U.S. Treasury in January 2019 on U.S. tax reform repatriation tax. In 2018, the benefit was attributable to refinements to the one-time U.S. transition tax and foreign tax costs on undistributed foreign earnings. The benefit recorded in 2017 was the result of the re-measurement of deferred tax balances to the new U.S. federal tax rate, as well as the U.S. transitiontax reform repatriation tax and any foreign tax costs on undistributed foreign earnings.

The net benefit related to U.S. tax reform is basedalso introduced GILTI, which subjects a U.S. shareholder to current tax on income earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. The company has elected to treat GILTI as a period cost if and when incurred, which resulted in the company’s estimates ascompany recording a benefit of $49 million and $20 million for the years ended December 31, 2017. All components2019 and 2018 respectively as a result of the provisional net benefit of $162 million are based on the company’s estimates as of December 31, 2017. Specifically, the transition tax, any foreign tax costs as well ascredits associated with and in excess of GILTI. Under the re-measurement of deferred tax balances are provisional and haveTax Sharing Agreement, the benefits-for-loss approach has been calculated based on existing tax lawapplied and the best information availableexcess credits were recorded as a current tax receivable due from IBM to be settled during the first quarter of 2020.

The effective tax rate for 2019 was 30.5 percent, an increase of 12.2 points, as compared to 2018. The year-to-year change in the date of estimate. The final impact of U.S.effective tax reform may differ, possibly materially, duerate was primarily attributable to factors such as changes in interpretations and assumptions that the company has made in its assessment, conclusion of the effects of the “Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income” provisions, further refinement of the company’s calculations, additional guidance that may be issued by the U.S. government, among other items. As these various factors are finalized, any change will be recorded as an adjustment to the provision for, or benefit from, income taxesTreasury in the period the amounts are determined, not to exceed 12 months from the date ofJanuary 2019 regarding U.S. tax reform enactment.

The 2017 continuing operations effectiverepatriation tax rate decreased 30.2 points from 2016 driven primarily(20 points). This was partially offset by the tax benefit related to the impact from the enactment of U.S. tax reform described above (21 points) and a year-to-year benefit due to the geographic mix of pre-tax earnings in 2017 (9GILTI provision (5 points).

The 2016 continuing operations effective tax rate decreased 8.9 points from 2015 largely due to the establishment of certain foreign valuation allowances in 2015.

The effect of tax law changes on deferred tax assets and liabilities wasdid not have a benefit of $171 million, driven by the U.S. tax reform and was includedmaterial impact in the net benefit.

2019.

The significant components of deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded in other assets and tax liabilities, respectively, in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position are as follows:

79

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Deferred Tax Assets

(Dollars in millions)

    

    

At December 31:

2019

2018

Bad debt reserves

$

56

$

48

Leases

 

81

 

59

Depreciation

 

1

 

3

Foreign tax loss/credit carryforwards

 

71

 

90

Other

 

52

 

39

Gross deferred tax assets

$

261

$

239

Less: valuation allowance

 

(72)

 

(86)

Net deferred tax assets

$

189

$

153

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Bad debt reserves

 

$

45

 

$

57

 

Leases

 

88

 

103

 

Depreciation

 

4

 

9

 

Foreign tax loss/credit carryforwards

 

82

 

76

 

Other

 

51

 

54

 

Gross deferred tax assets

 

$

270

 

$

299

 

Less: valuation allowance

 

(96

)

(89

)

Net deferred tax assets

 

$

174

 

$

210

 

Deferred Tax Liabilities

(Dollars in millions)

    

    

 

At December 31:

2019

2018

Leases

$

576

$

469

Other

 

16

 

17

Gross deferred tax liabilities

$

592

$

486

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

At December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

Leases

 

$

418

 

$

463

 

Other

 

14

 

13

 

Gross deferred tax liabilities

 

$

432

 

$

477

 

The loss carryforwards as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018 were $82$71 million and $76$90 million (tax effected), respectively, with substantially all of these carryforwards available for at least two and up to five years.

The valuation allowances as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 were $96$72 million, $89$86 million and $81$96 million, respectively. The amounts principally apply to loss carryforwards, credits and timing differences. In the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that these assets will not be realized. However, to the extent that tax benefits related to these carryforwards are realized in the future, the reduction in the valuation allowance will reduce income tax expense.

The company is subject to taxation in the U.S. and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With respect to the company’s U.S. federal and certain state and foreign operations that are included in applicable IBM consolidated tax returns, pursuant to the Tax Sharing Agreement, any subsequent changes to the company’s income tax liability as a result of valuation allowances and tax examinations are the responsibility of IBM. Therefore, any recognition and subsequent changes in assessment about the sustainability of related tax positions, including interest and penalties, are the responsibility of IBM. As such, there have been no0 uncertain tax liabilities recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements for entities that file as part of IBM’s consolidated tax filings as the company bears no risk associated with any subsequent change in the sustainability of uncertain tax positions.

For the company’s separate income tax return filings, the company is generally no longer subject to tax examinations for years prior to 2013. At December 31, 2017, current2014. Current year unrecognized tax benefits recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements related to certain foreign separate income tax return filers were $1 million. There were no uncertain tax positions recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements related to separate income tax return filers for the years ended$10 million at December 31, 20162019 and 2015.

$4 million at December 31, 2018. Interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities are included in income tax expense. In 2019, interest accrued relating to income taxes was immaterial. During the year ended December 31, 2017,2018, the company recognized a net benefit of $5 million in interest expense relating to certain foreign separate income tax return filers. Forfilers, whereas for 2017, the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015,company recognized a net charge of $5 million in interest accrued relating to income taxes was immaterial.expense.

Included inWithin consolidated retained earnings at December 31, 20172019 are undistributed after-tax earnings from non-UScertain non-U.S. subsidiaries as well asthat are not indefinitely reinvested. At December 31, 2019, the company has a provisional amountdeferred tax liability of U.S. income taxes and foreign distribution$9 million for the estimated taxes associated with the repatriation of these earnings.

80

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

NOTE L.M. RETIREMENT-RELATED BENEFITS

IBM Credit employees are eligible to participate in IBM’s retirement plans. Retirement-related plans are accounted for as multiemployer, multiple-employer or multiple-employerdefined contribution plans, as required by local regulations.

Multiemployer and Defined Contribution Plans:

For multiemployer plans, IBM allocates charges to the company for multiemployer and defined contribution costs based on the number of employees. The charges related to multiemployer plans are recorded in the company’s operating results in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. The amounts of (income) or expense attributed to the company by IBM for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 were not material.

Charges from IBM to the company in relation to these plans (including non-pension post-retirement benefits) are limited to service costs.costs and defined contribution cost. Contributions to multiemployer and defined contribution plans and any other types of costscost are the responsibility of IBM.

Multiple-employer Plans:

For multiple-employer plans (mainly in Germany, Spain and Japan), assets and obligations are based on actuarial valuations or allocations and are recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position. The net liability for multiple-employer plans for the years ended 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016 and 2015 were $40was $57 million, $39$44 million and $35$40 million, respectively. The gross asset balances were $37$42 million, $27$36 million and $28$37 million at December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 2015,2017, respectively. The projected benefit obligation (PBO) balances were $77$98 million, $66$80 million and $63$77 million at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Actuarial losses in Accumulated Other Comprehensive IncomeAOCI at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016were $19 million, $10 million and 2015 were $7 million, $9 millionrespectively. Remeasurement gains and $9 million, respectively. Any gains or losses recorded to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in eachAOCI at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were losses of the reported periods were not material.

$10 million, $3 million, and a gain of $2 million, respectively.

Costs related to multiple-employer plans are recorded in the company’s operating results in the Consolidated Statement of Earnings. The total costcosts for multiple-employer plans for years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 2016were $4 million, $4 million and 2015 were $3 million, $5 million and $7 million, respectively.

NOTE M.N. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The company’s operations consist of two2 business segments: Client Financing and Commercial Financing. The segments represent components of the company for which separate financial information is available that is utilized on a regular basis by the chief operating decision maker in determining how to allocate resources and evaluate performance.

The company is organized on the basis of its financing offerings. The company’s reportable segments are business units that offer different financing solutions based upon the needs of the company’s clients. The segment’s assets are defined by income generating assets within each operating segment and do not represent total assets of the company.

Information about each segment’s business and the financing services that generate each segment’s revenue is located in Item 1, entitled “Business”, and in the “Segment Details” section within Item 7, entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,Operations.

81

Table of this report.Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

The segments include an allocation ofcompany allocates interest expense and SG&A expense by the company to each of its operating segments. Interest expense is allocated based on the average assets of each segment. SG&A expense is allocated based on a measurable financial driver, such as net margin.

(Dollars in millions)

Client

Commercial

Total

At December 31, 2019

    

Financing

    

Financing

    

Segments

Revenue

$

1,187

$

413

 

$

1,600

Pre-tax income

 

434

 

184

 

 

619

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease

 

160

 

 

 

160

Interest expense

 

376

 

124

 

 

499

Provision for/(benefit from) credit losses

(2)

(3)

(5)

Assets

 

22,362

 

3,443

 

 

25,805

(Dollars in millions)

    

Client

    

Commercial

    

Total

At December 31, 2018

    

Financing

    

Financing

    

Segments

Revenue

$

1,206

$

574

$

1,779

Pre-tax income

 

490

 

240

 

731

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease

 

193

 

 

193

Interest expense

 

335

 

168

 

503

Provision for/(benefit from) credit losses

27

(18)

9

Assets

 

22,533

 

12,743

 

35,277

(Dollars in millions)

    

Client

    

Commercial

    

Total

At December 31, 2017

Financing

Financing

Segments

Revenue

$

1,248

$

454

$

1,702

Pre-tax income

 

574

 

181

 

755

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease

 

231

 

 

231

Interest expense

 

246

 

116

 

362

Provision for credit losses

 

14

 

1

 

15

Assets

 

22,880

 

12,568

 

35,448

(Dollars in millions)

 

  

 

  

 

  

Reconciliation of IBM Credit as reported

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

Assets

 

  

 

  

 

  

Total Reportable Segments

 

$

25,805

 

$

35,277

 

$

35,448

Cash and cash equivalents

 

1,687

 

1,828

 

2,680

Other receivables from IBM

513

2,019

1,024

Deferred taxes

 

142

 

120

 

121

Derivatives

 

45

 

18

 

3

Other

 

219

 

235

 

240

Total consolidated assets

 

$

28,412

 

$

39,497

 

$

39,516

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)Major Clients

(Dollars in millions)

 

Client

 

Commercial

 

Total

 

At December 31, 2017

 

Financing

 

Financing

 

Segments

 

Revenue

 

$

1,248

 

$

454

 

$

1,702

 

Pre-tax income from continuing operations

 

574

 

181

 

755

 

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease

 

231

 

 

231

 

Financing cost (interest expense)

 

246

 

116

 

362

 

Provision for credit losses

 

14

 

1

 

15

 

Assets

 

22,880

 

12,568

 

35,448

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Client

 

Commercial

 

Total

 

At December 31, 2016

 

Financing

 

Financing

 

Segments

 

Revenue

 

$

1,455

 

$

385

 

$

1,840

 

Pre-tax income from continuing operations

 

564

 

155

 

719

 

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease

 

307

 

 

307

 

Financing cost (interest expense)

 

261

 

102

 

364

 

Provision for credit losses

 

57

 

14

 

72

 

Assets

 

21,687

 

10,911

 

32,597

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

Client

 

Commercial

 

Total

 

At December 31, 2015

 

Financing

 

Financing

 

Segments

 

Revenue

 

$

1,714

 

$

359

 

$

2,074

 

Pre-tax income from continuing operations

 

620

 

163

 

783

 

Depreciation of equipment under operating lease

 

378

 

 

378

 

Financing cost (interest expense)

 

346

 

120

 

466

 

Provision for credit losses

 

142

 

(9

)

133

 

Assets

 

23,787

 

9,811

 

33,598

 

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reconciliation of IBM Credit as reported

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Reportable Segments

 

$

35,448

 

$

32,597

 

$

33,598

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 

2,680

 

1,772

 

1,487

 

Other receivables from IBM

 

1,024

 

482

 

94

 

Deferred taxes

 

121

 

133

 

136

 

Derivatives

 

3

 

115

 

 

Other

 

240

 

180

 

272

 

Total consolidated assets

 

$

39,516

 

$

35,279

 

$

35,586

 

Major Clients

NoNaN single client represented 10 percent or more of the company’s total revenue in 2017, 20162019, 2018 or 2015.

2017.

Geographic Information

The following provides information for those countries that are 10 percent or more of the specific category.

82

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Revenue*

(Dollars in millions)

 

For the year ended December 31:

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

United States

$

690

$

678

$

606

Other countries

 

910

 

1,102

 

1,096

Total revenue

$

1,600

$

1,779

$

1,702

*

Revenues are generally attributed to countries based on the location of the client.

Revenue*

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

United States

 

$

606

 

$

540

 

$

610

 

Brazil

 

133

 

173

 

293

 

Other countries

 

963

 

1,128

 

1,171

 

Total revenue

 

$

1,702

 

$

1,840

 

$

2,074

 

* Revenues are generally attributed to countries based on the location of the client.

Financing Receivables, Net of Allowance for Credit Losses

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

United States

 

$

11,892

 

$

10,765

 

$

10,675

 

$

9,365

$

11,821

$

11,892

Other countries

 

14,174

 

13,916

 

17,944

 

 

8,000

 

14,027

 

14,174

Total net financing receivables

 

$

26,066

 

$

24,681

 

$

28,620

 

$

17,365

$

25,848

$

26,066

Equipment under Operating Lease, Net of Depreciation

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For the year ended December 31:

 

2017

 

2016

 

2015

 

    

2019

    

2018

    

2017

United States

 

$

76

 

$

129

 

$

208

 

$

64

$

81

$

76

Other countries

 

324

 

377

 

393

 

 

147

 

305

 

324

Total equipment under operating lease - net

 

$

401

 

$

506

 

$

602

 

$

212

$

386

$

401

NOTE N. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONSO. DIVESTITURE

On December 31, 2016,In the company divestedfourth quarter of 2018, IBM entered into a definitive agreement to sell certain commercial financing capabilities and assign a number of its remanufacturing and remarketing businesscommercial financing contracts, excluding related receivables which were collected as they became due in the U.S. to IBM.normal course of business. The company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 include $120 million and $273 million, respectively,transaction closed in cash provided by the operating activities of the divested business.

During the first quarter of 2017, the company received2019 and resulted in a cash payment from IBMpre-tax gain of $121$16 million as settlementin 2019.

83

Table of the divestiture. The settlement amount is presented in other investing activities-net in the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows as of December 31, 2017. There was no gain or loss recognized on the divestiture of the business to IBM.

The company performed a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the disposal of the U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business to assess its qualification and treatment as a discontinued operation. The company concluded that the divestiture represented a significant strategic shift in the company’s operations which will have a material effect on the future financial results of the company. As a result, the U.S. remanufacturing and remarketing business results are presented as discontinued operations for the years 2016 and 2015 in the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – (continued)

Profit/(Loss) from Discontinued Operations:

(Dollars in millions)

 

2016

 

2015

 

Revenue

 

$

583

 

$

891

 

Cost of sales

 

300

 

407

 

Selling, general, and administrative expense

 

66

 

63

 

Income from discontinued operations before income taxes

 

$

217

 

$

421

 

Provision for income taxes

 

85

 

166

 

Net income from discontinued operations - net of tax

 

$

131

 

$

255

 

NOTE O. SUBSEQUENT EVENTSContents

On February 6, 2018, the company issued $2.0 billion in bonds as follows: $450 million of 3-year floating-rate bonds priced at LIBOR plus 16 basis points, $800 million of 3-year fixed-rate bonds with a 2.65 percent coupon and $750 million of 5-year fixed-rate bonds with a 3.0 percent coupon.


End of Notes

IBM CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EARNINGS

SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA

(UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in millions)

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

    

  

2019

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Full Year

Revenue

$

482

$

410

$

372

$

335

$

1,600

Net margin

 

277

 

230

 

212

 

194

 

913

Income before income taxes

 

193

 

136

 

131

 

158

 

619

Net income

 

43

 

113

 

109

 

165

 

430

(Dollars in millions)

    

First

    

Second

    

Third

    

Fourth

    

2018

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Quarter

Full Year

Revenue

$

449

$

433

$

452

$

446

$

1,779

Net margin

 

300

 

259

 

268

 

256

 

1,083

Income before income taxes

 

191

 

148

 

184

 

208

 

731

Net income

 

149

 

117

 

144

 

187

 

597

(Dollars in millions)

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

 

 

2017

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Full Year

 

Revenue

 

$

444

 

$

413

 

$

418

 

$

427

 

$

1,702

 

Net margin

 

300

 

266

 

264

 

280

 

1,109

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

178

 

145

 

165

 

267

 

755

 

Income from continuing operations 1

 

137

 

112

 

127

 

374

 

750

 

Net income 1

 

137

 

112

 

127

 

374

 

750

 


(1)        The enactment of U.S. tax reform resulted in the company recognizing a provisional one-time net benefit of $162 million in December 2017. The net benefit was primarily the result of the re-measurement of deferred tax balances to the new U.S. federal tax rate, as well as the U.S. transition tax and any foreign tax costs on undistributed foreign earnings. As a result, income from continuing operations and net income increased in the fourth quarter and full-year 2017.

(Dollars in millions)

 

First

 

Second

 

Third

 

Fourth

 

 

 

2016

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Quarter

 

Full Year

 

Revenue

 

$

478

 

$

463

 

$

459

 

$

439

 

$

1,840

 

Net margin

 

307

 

291

 

290

 

281

 

1,170

 

Income from continuing operations before income taxes

 

135

 

198

 

195

 

191

 

719

 

Income from continuing operations

 

92

 

136

 

133

 

136

 

498

 

Income from discontinued operations - net of tax

 

35

 

27

 

8

 

62

 

131

 

Net income

 

128

 

162

 

141

 

198

 

629

 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. The company’s management evaluated, with the participation of the Chairman and President, and the Vice President, Finance, the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chairman and President, and the Vice President, of Finance, have concluded that the company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the latest quarter.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.

The company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2019 based on the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.

84

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There has been no change in the company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the periods covered by this reportfourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’scompany's internal control over financial reporting.

This Annual Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial reporting or an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission for newly public companies.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

IBM Credit has omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

IBM Credit has omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

IBM Credit has omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

IBM Credit has omitted this section pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(c) of Form 10-K.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

As an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of IBM, our principal accounting fees and services are subject to the pre-approval policies and procedures that govern all fees paid to, and all services performed by, PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) for audit and audit-related professional services and tax-related advice and services to IBM. For additional information regarding IBM’s policies and procedures, see IBM’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)SEC and delivered to IBM stockholders in connection with IBM’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 24, 2018.28, 2020. The appointment of PwC as IBM’s independent registered public accounting firm was ratified by majority vote of IBM’s shareholders during the annual shareholder’s meeting on April 25, 201730, 2019 (see IBM’s 8-K filed with the SEC on April 28, 2017)May 3, 2019).

The fees for services provided to IBM Credit by PwC for the fiscal periods indicated:

(Dollars in millions)

 

2017

 

2016

 

    

2019

    

2018

Audit Fees

 

$

10.2

 

$

11.5

 

$

6.7

$

6.6

Audit-Related Fees

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

0.3

Tax Fees

 

 

 

 

 

All Other Fees

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

10.9

 

$

11.5

 

$

6.7

$

6.9

Audit Fees: comprise fees for professional services necessary to perform an audit or review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, including services rendered for the audit of the company’s annual financial statements and review of quarterly financial statements. Also includes fees for services that are normally incurred in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, such as comfort letters, statutory audits, attest services, consents, and review of documents filed with the SEC.

Audit-Related Fees: comprise fees for services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the company’s financial statements, including the support of business acquisition and divestiture activities, independent assessments for service organization control reports and audit and review of the company’s retirement and other benefit-related programs.

85

Table of Contents

Tax Fees: comprise fees for tax compliance, tax planning and tax advice. Corporate tax services encompass a variety of permissible services, including technical tax advice related to U.S. international tax matters; assistance with foreign income and withholding tax matters, assistance with sales tax, value added tax and equivalent tax related matters in local jurisdictions/ preparation of reports to comply with local tax authority transfer pricing documentation requirements; and assistance with tax audits.

All Other Fees: comprise fees primarily in connection with certain benchmarking work and permissible advisory services.

86

Table of Contents

PART IV

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)  The following documents are filed as part of this report:

1.              Financial statements of IBM Credit and its subsidiary companies for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 as indexed below.

2.              Financial statement schedule required to be filed by Item 8 of this Form 10-K as indexed below. All other schedules are omitted as the required matter is not present, the amounts are not significant or the information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

1.Financial statements of IBM Credit and its subsidiary companies for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 as indexed below.
2.Financial statement schedule required to be filed by Item 8 of this Form 10-K as indexed below. All other schedules are omitted as the required matter is not present, the amounts are not significant or the information is shown in the Consolidated Financial Statements or the notes thereto.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULE

Page

Audited Annual Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

4742

Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017

4843

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017

4844

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position as of December 31, 20172019 and 20162018

4945

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017

5046

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Member’s Interest for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017

5147

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

5249

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162019, 2018 and 20152017

92

Selected Quarterly Data (Unaudited)

Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the years ended December 31, 20172019 and 20162018

8584

3.                   Exhibits:

3.Exhibits:

Reference

Number per

Item 601 of

Regulation S-K

   

Description of Exhibits

    

Exhibit Number
in this
Form 10-K

Exhibit Number
in this
Form 10-K

(2)

Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or succession.

Not applicable

(3)

The Certificate of Formation of IBM Credit LLC, dated December 20, 2002 and effective January 1, 2003, is Exhibit 3.1 to the Form S-3 filed August 4, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

The Certificate of Conversion of IBM Credit LLC, dated as of January 1, 2003, is Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10 filed May 5, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

The Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of IBM Credit LLC, dated as of April 24, 2017, is Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 10 filed May 5, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

(4)

Instruments defining the rights of security holders.

87

Table of Contents

Reference
Number per
Item 601 of
Regulation S-K

Description of Exhibits

Exhibit Number
in this
Form 10-K

The Indenture between IBM Credit LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, dated as of September 8, 2017, is Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed September 8, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

The instruments defining the rights of the holders of the Floating Rate Notes due 2019 and 2021, 1.625% Notes due 2019, 1.800% Notes due 2021, and 2.200% Notes due 2022 are Exhibits 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 to the Form 8-K filed September 8, 2017, and are hereby incorporated by reference.

The instruments defining the rights of the holders of the Floating Rate Notes due 2021, 2.650% Notes due 2021 and 3.000% Notes due 2023 are Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed February 5, 2018, and are hereby incorporated by reference.

The instruments defining the rights of the holders of the Floating Rate Notes due 2020, 3.450% Notes due 2020 and 3.600% Notes due 2021 are Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed November 29, 2018, and are hereby incorporated by reference.

Description of Securities Registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

4.1

(9)

Voting trust agreement.

Not applicable

(10)

Material Contracts.

The Support Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2017, between International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, is Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10 filed May 5, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

The Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2017, between International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, is Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10 filed May 5, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

$2,500,000,000 364-Day Credit Agreement dated as of July 18, 2019, among International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, as Borrowers, the several banks and other financial institutions from time to time parties to such agreement, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas, Citibank N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Syndication Agents, and the Documentation Agents named therein, is Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed on July 19, 2019, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

Amended and Restated $2,500,000,000 Three-Year Credit Agreement dated as of July 19, 2018, among International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, as Borrowers, the Several Lenders from time to time parties to such Agreement, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas, Citibank, N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Syndication Agents, and the Documentation Agents named therein, is Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on July 20, 2018, and is hereby incorporated by this reference.

88

Table of Contents

Reference
Number per
Item 601 of
Regulation S-K

   

Description of Exhibits

    

Exhibit Number
in this
Form 10-K

Confirmation of Termination Date Extension to $2,500,000,000 Amended and Restated Three-Year Credit Agreement dated as of July 19, 2018, among International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, as Borrowers, the several banks and other financial institutions from time to time parties to such agreement, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas, Citibank, N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Syndication Agents, and the Documentation Agents named therein, is Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed on July 19, 2019, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

(11)

Statement re computation of per share earnings

Not applicable

(12)

Statement re computation of ratios

Not applicable

(13)

Annual report to security holders

Not applicable

(18)

Letter re change in accounting principles

Not applicable

(19)

Previously unfiled documents

Not applicable

(21)

Subsidiaries of the registrant

Not applicable*

(22)

Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders

Not applicable

(23)

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

23.1

(24)

Powers of attorney

24.1

Resolution of the IBM Credit Board of Managers authorizing execution of this report by Powers of Attorney

24.2

(31)

Certification by principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13-A-14(a) or 15-D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.1

Certification by principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13-A-14(a) or 15-D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

(32)

Certification by principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification by principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear on the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

89

Table of Contents

Reference
Number per
Item 601 of
Regulation S-K

   

Description of Exhibits

    

Exhibit Number
in this
Form 10-K

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

101

104

Cover Page Interactive Data File - the cover page interactive data file does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

104

*

IBM Credit has omitted this exhibit pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(b) of Form 10-K.

Reference
Number per
Item 601 of
Regulation S-K

 

Description of Exhibits

 

Exhibit Number
in this
Form 10-K

 

 

 

 

 

(4)

 

Instruments defining the rights of security holders.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Indenture between IBM Credit LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, dated as of September 8, 2017, is Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K filed September 8, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The instruments defining the rights of the holders of the Floating Rate Notes due 2019 and 2021, 1.625% Notes due 2019, 1.800% Notes due 2021, and 2.200% Notes due 2022 are Exhibits 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5, and 4.6 to the Form 8-K filed September 8, 2017, and are hereby incorporated by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The instruments defining the rights of the holders of the Floating Rate Notes due 2021, 2.650% Notes due 2021 and 3.000% Notes due 2023 are Exhibits 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3 to the Form 8-K filed February 5, 2018, and are hereby incorporated by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9)

 

Voting trust agreement.

 

Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

(10)

 

Material Contracts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Support Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2017, between International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, is Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10 filed May 5, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Tax Sharing Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2017, between International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, is Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10 filed May 5, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The $2,500,000,000 364-Day Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2017 among International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, as Borrowers, The Several Lenders from Time to Time Parties to such Agreement, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas, Citibank N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Syndication Agents, and the Documentation Agents named therein, is Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K filed July 25, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The $2,500,000,000 Three-Year Credit Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2017, among International Business Machines Corporation and IBM Credit LLC, as Borrowers, The Several Lenders from Time to Time Parties to such Agreement, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, BNP Paribas, Citibank, N.A., Royal Bank of Canada and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Syndication Agents, and the Documentation Agents named therein, is Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K filed July 25, 2017, and is hereby incorporated by reference.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(11)

 

Statement re computation of per share earnings

 

Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

(12)

 

Statement re computation of ratios

 

12

 

 

 

 

 

(13)

 

Annual report to security holders

 

Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

(18)

 

Letter re change in accounting principles

 

Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

(19)

 

Previously unfiled documents

 

Not applicable

 

 

 

 

 

(21)

 

Subsidiaries of the registrant

 

Not applicable*

 

 

 

 

 

(22)

 

Published report regarding matters submitted to vote of security holders

 

Not applicable

Reference
Number per
Item 601 of
Regulation S-K

 

Description of Exhibits

 

Exhibit Number
in this
Form 10-K

 

 

 

 

 

(23)

 

Consent of experts

 

23.1

 

 

 

 

 

(24)

 

Powers of attorney

 

24.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resolution of the IBM Credit Board of Managers authorizing execution of this report by Powers of Attorney

 

24.2

 

 

 

 

 

(31)

 

Certification by principal executive officer pursuant to Rule 13-A-14(a) or 15-D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

31.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certification by principal financial officer pursuant to Rule 13-A-14(a) or 15-D-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

31.2

 

 

 

 

 

(32)

 

Certification by principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Certification by principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

 

32.2

 

 

 

 

 

101.INS

 

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.SCH

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.CAL

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.DEF

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.LAB

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

101.PRE

 

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

101


* IBM Credit has omitted this exhibit pursuant to General Instruction I(2)(b) of Form 10-K.

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

None.

90

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

IBM CREDIT LLC

(Registrant)

By:

/s/ William J. Smith III

William J. Smith III

Chairman and President

Date: March 1, 2018February 28, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Title

Date

/s/ William J. Smith III

Chairman and President

March 1, 2018February 28, 2020

William J. Smith III

(Chief Executive Officer)

/s/ Adam Wilson

Vice President, Finance

March 1, 2018February 28, 2020

Adam Wilson

(Chief Financial Officer)

/s/ Henry Voldman

Director, Finance

March 1, 2018February 28, 2020

Henry Voldman

(Controller)

Elizabeth A. Barzelatto

Manager

By:

/s/ Todd Hutchen

Simon J. Beaumont

Manager

By:

Todd Hutchen/s/ Glen Kutler

Robert F. Del Bene

Manager

Attorney-in-factGlen Kutler

Edward ShayAndrew P. Urbansky

Manager

Attorney-in-fact

Date:

March 1, 2018February 28, 2020

91

SCHEDULE II

IBM CREDIT LLC AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES

VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES

For the Years Ended December 31:

(Dollars in millions)

 

 

Balance at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance at

 

 

 

Beginning

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

End

 

Description

 

of Period

 

Additions 1

 

Write-offs 2

 

Other 3

 

of Period

 

Allowance For Credit Losses:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2017

 

$

277

 

$

15

 

$

(91

)

$

11

 

$

213

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2016

 

$

626

 

$

72

 

$

(111

)

$

(309

)

$

277

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2015

 

$

608

 

$

133

 

$

(60

)

$

(55

)

$

626

 

Balance at

Balance at

Beginning

Additions /

End

Description

    

of Period

    

(Releases) 1

    

Write-offs 2

    

Other 3

    

of Period

Allowance For Credit Losses:

2019

$

192

$

(5)

$

(32)

$

(1)

 

$

155

2018

$

213

$

9

$

(21)

$

(8)

 

$

192

2017

$

277

$

15

$

(91)

$

11

 

$

213


(1)Additions for allowance for credit losses are charged to expense accounts.

(2)For additional information regarding write-offs, see note A, “Significant"Significant Accounting Policies," to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(3)        In 2016, the amount in “Other” reflects the reduction in allowance for credit losses associated with certain impaired receivables that were retained by IBM due to IBM’s ongoing collection efforts. In addition, the amount in “Other” also comprises currency"Other" primarily represents translation adjustments in all periods reported. For additional information, see note A, “Significant Accounting Policies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

92