UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x☒ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 20182021
OR
OR☐
oTRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission File No. 001-31298
LANNETT COMPANY, INC.INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
9000 State Road1150 Northbrook Drive, Suite 155
Philadelphia, Trevose, Pennsylvania 1913619053
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (215) (215) 333-9000
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered | ||
Common Stock, $0.001 par value | | LCI | | New York Stock Exchange |
Common Stock, $.001 Par Value
(Title of class)
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x☐ No o☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o☐No x☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No o☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filerswhether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to ItemRule 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part IIIS-T (§232.405 of this Form 10-K or any amendmentchapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to this Form 10-K. osubmit such files). Yes☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
| |
Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer |
| |
Non-accelerated filer | Smaller reporting company |
| Emerging growth company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12B-12 of the Exchange Act). Yes o☐ No x
☒
Aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, as of December 31, 20172020 was $661,533,778$214,124,709 based on the closing price of the stock on the NYSE.
As of July 31, 2018,2021, there were 38,901,53242,276,052 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $.001 par value, outstanding.
2
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Any statements made in this Annual Report that are not statements of historical fact or that refer to estimated or anticipated future events are forward-looking statements. We have based our forward-looking statements on management’s beliefs and assumptions based on information available to them at this time. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “estimate,” “continue,” or “pursue,” or the negative other variations thereof or comparable terminology, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements reflect our current perspective of our business, future performance, existing trends and information as of the date of this filing. These include, but are not limited to the impact of the nonrenewal of the exclusive distribution agreement with Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals on our future business and prospects, our beliefs about future revenue and expense levels, growth rates, prospects related to our strategic initiatives and business strategies, express or implied assumptions about government regulatory action or inaction, anticipated product approvals and launches, business initiatives and product development activities, assessments related to clinical trial results, product performance and competitive environment, anticipated financial performance and integration of acquisitions.performance. The statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. We caution the reader that certain important factors may affect our actual operating results and could cause such results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Lannett is under no obligation to, and expressly disclaims any such obligation to, update or alter its forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise and other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control, including those resulting from such events, or the prospect of such events, such as public health issues including health epidemics or pandemics, such as the recent outbreak of the novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”), whether occurring in the United States or elsewhere, which could disrupt our operations, disrupt the operations of our suppliers and business development and other strategic partners, disrupt the global financial markets or result in political or economic instability. We believe the risks and uncertainties discussed under the “Item 1A - Risk Factors” and other risks and uncertainties detailed herein and from time to time in our SEC filings may affect our actual results.
We disclaim any obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We also may make additional disclosures in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and in other filings that we may make from time to time with the SEC. Other factors besides those listed here could also adversely affect us.
3
PART I
ITEM 1.DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
Business Overview
Lannett Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company,” “Lannett,” “we,” or “us”) was incorporated in 1942 under the laws of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and reincorporated in 1991 as a Delaware corporation. We primarily develop, manufacture, market and distribute generic versions of brand pharmaceutical products. Generics represent the vast majority of U.S. prescriptions today, accounting for approximately 90% of prescriptions in the 12-month period ending June 30, 2021. We report financial information on a quarterly and fiscal year basis with the most recent being the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.2021. All references herein to a “fiscal year” or “Fiscal” refer to the applicable fiscal year ended June 30.
TheOver the past 18 years, the Company has experiencedgrown total net sales growth at a compounded annual growth rate in excess of 27% over the past seventeen years. In that time period, total net sales increased from $12.1 million in fiscal year 2001 to $684.6$478.8 million in fiscal year 2018. This growth has been achieved2021. The Company generates revenue through filing and receiving approvals for abbreviated new drug applications (“ANDAs”), strategic partnerships and launches of additional manufactured drugs, opportunities resulting from our strong historical record of regulatory compliance, as well as the acquisitions offrom products acquired from Silarx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Silarx”) and Kremers Urban Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“KUPI”). in 2015. More recently, the Company’s revenues have grown through a renewed emphasis on new product launches, strategic portfolio management and business development. We have launched 55 products since January 2018, anchored by 24 new partner agreements, covering 33 new product launches, and complemented by 22 acquired or internally developed products. Over the last three years, new product launches have generated more than $485 million of revenues.
Today, we market more than 100 products, mainly tablet, capsule or liquid oral generic medications. Examples of marketed products include generics such as Posaconazole, Fluphenazine, Levothyroxine and Sumatriptan and our NDA-based product Numbrino. Our portfolio includes medications across multiple and diverse groups of therapeutic categories. The 55 products we launched have grown our revenue base, diversified our portfolio and reduced product concentration. For the fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019, the Company’s top two products contributed, on average, approximately 40% of revenues. By comparison, our top two products accounted for approximately 28% and 19% of revenues for fiscal years 2020 and 2021, respectively.
MostThe Company’s pipeline includes 12 ANDAs currently pending at the FDA and more than 20 additional product candidates in various stages of development. More recent additions to our pipeline include high value, large market opportunity products that are often partnered. These higher value products generally have more technical, manufacturing, regulatory and operational complexity and require significant capital investment for specialized and dedicated manufacturing facilities and equipment, making them more durable product opportunities with fewer expected competitors. Four of the product candidates, generic Advair Diskus and generic Flovent Diskus, combination drug/devices for the treatment of asthma, and biosimilar Insulin Glargine and biosimilar Insulin Aspart for the treatment of diabetes both delivered in a device, are widely used medications that we believe represent a combined U.S. addressable market opportunity of over $13 billion in 2021, which includes the entire Insulin Glargine market. The ANDA for the generic Advair Diskus product was submitted to the FDA on April 1, 2021, and the generic Flovent Diskus product along with the Insulin Glargine and Insulin Aspart biosimilar products are all in relatively advanced stages of development. We have identified and are negotiating with current and potential partners for additional complex, large and durable market opportunity products, including other biosimilars and inhalation drug/device products.
4
Over the past three years, we have made cost and operational discipline, along with reducing our debt, key priorities. Since the beginning of calendar year 2018, we lowered our gross debt level by more than $320 million, which included paying off our Term A Loan in November 2020 and Term Loan B in April 2021. We have streamlined our operations by restructuring and generally exiting the pain management Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients (“APIs”) business. We consolidated plants and facilities, and substantially increased production and output at our remaining manufacturing sites in Seymour, Indiana and Carmel, New York. In addition, we have reduced costs companywide; these efforts included substantial workforce reductions, a $66 million cost savings plan implemented in 2018 (approximately half of which we re-invested into the business) and another $15 million cost reduction plan implemented in July 2020. The July 2020 cost reduction plan included consolidating our Research and Development (“R&D”) function into one location, as well as other cost savings measures focused on our manufacturing base.
Competitive Strengths
Diversified product portfolio. We currently market over 100 products across multiple therapeutic categories. For the fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019, the Company’s top two products contributed, on average, approximately 40% of revenues. By comparison, our top two products accounted for approximately 28% and 19% of revenues for fiscal years 2020 and 2021, respectively.
Attractive mid to longer term pipeline. We believe we have an attractive pipeline of large product opportunities that will enable us to grow revenue and profitability. For example, we filed the ANDA for generic Advair on April 1, 2021, and are on track to launch in calendar year 2022, if approved. The other dry powder inhaler we have in partnership with Respirent, generic Flovent Diskus, is currently in clinical development. Additionally, we are focused on advancing our biosimilar Insulin Glargine and biosimilar Insulin Aspart pipeline products to potentially launch in calendar years 2023 and 2024, respectively. We believe leveraging our existing relationships to collaborate on opportunities across dry powder inhalation, metered dose inhalation, and other biosimilar products will enable us to further strengthen our pipeline.
Extensive experience with productive partnerships. We continue to grow, diversify and strengthen our business by entering into partnerships to distribute both externally developed products and authorized generic equivalents of brand products. We are focused on the U.S. generics market, but our partnership opportunities are global, as demonstrated by our partnerships with HEC, Respirent, Rivopharm, IBSA, Cediprof/Neolpharma and Sinotherapeutics, due to our experience, expertise and reliability in commercialization in the U.S. market. In fiscal year 2021, we successfully launched around a dozen new products, several of which are sourced from external parties, including Levothyroxine tablets and Levothyroxine capsules (Tirosint®). We believe that our success with these products, along with existing alliances, has established us as a strong development and marketing partner creating the foundation for continued productive partnership alliances in the future.
Strong internal product development capabilities. We believe that our U.S.-based manufacturing expertise, low overhead expenses and skilled product development capabilities will contribute to being competitive in the generic pharmaceutical market. We intend to dedicate significant resources toward developing new products because we believe our success is linked to our ability to continually introduce new generic products into the marketplace.
Strong track record of obtaining regulatory approvals for new products. During the past three fiscal years, we have received one NDA approval and 12 ANDA approvals from the FDA. Although the timing of ANDA approvals by the FDA is uncertain, we currently expect to continue to receive more during Fiscal 2022. These regulatory approvals will enable us to manufacture and/or distributeand supply a broader portfolio of generic pharmaceutical products.
Market orientation. We believe that our success depends on our ability to properly assess the competitive market for new products, including customer interest, the number of competitors, market share opportunity and the generic unit price erosion. We look to reduce our exposure to competitive influences that may negatively affect our sales and profits, including the potential saturation of the market for certain products, by continuing to emphasize a strong product selection process with an orientation in internal development to areas where we have technological and manufacturing expertise and use external development partnerships to access other technologies and associated manufacturing capacity as well as risk sharing.
5
Leverage our flexibility and speed. We believe flexibility and speed in decision-making are prescription products.critical success factors in the generic industry. Our top five productsmid-sized scale and relatively less complex organizational structure as a U.S. based organization results in fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016 accounted for 58%, 53% and 57%a nimbler response to securing market opportunities. For example, Fluphenazine, a product that contributed approximately $96 million of total net sales, respectively. On August 20, 2018, the Company announced that its distribution agreement (the “JSP Distribution Agreement”) with Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals (“JSP”), which expires on March 23, 2019 will not be renewed. Accordingly, future compounded annual growth rates and top product concentration rates will decline. Net sales of JSP products, primarily Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets USP, which is one of our top five products, totaled $253.1 million, $187.0 million and $190.4 millionrevenue in fiscal year 2018, 20172020, was the result of the Company capitalizing on changing market opportunity and 2016, respectively, or 37%, 30%achieving significant market share and 35% of total net sales, respectively.
Competitive Strengths
profitability for about a decade before other new manufacturers entered the market in early fiscal year 2021.
Dependable U.S. Based SupplierU.S.-based supplier to our Customerscustomers. We believe we are viewed within the generic pharmaceutical industryby our customers as a strong, dependable supplier due in part to our agile and reliable operations network, as well as having a less complex manufacturing/supply chain based mostly within the U.S. We have cultivated strong and dependableproductive customer relationships by focusing on what is important to our customersthem and their patients, along with maintaining adequate inventory levels, employing a responsive order filling system and prioritizing timely fulfillment of those orders. AUnless a later delivery date is specified, a majority of our orders are filled and shipped on or the day after we receive the order.
Market Orientation. We believe that our success depends on our ability to properly assess the competitive market for new products, including market share, the number of competitors and the generic unit price erosion. We intend to reduce our exposure to competitive influences that may negatively affect our sales and profits, including the potential saturation of the market for certain products, by continuing to emphasize maintenance of a strong product selection process with a focus on internal development where we have technological expertise and external development partnerships for other technologies.
Extensive Experience with Productive Partnerships. We continue to grow, diversify and strengthen our business by entering into partnerships to distribute both externally developed products and authorized generic equivalents of brand products. In fiscal year 2018, we successfully launched products such as Diclofenac Sodium ER tablets (Voltaren SR®), Metoprolol Succinate ER tablets (Toprol XR®) and Niacin ER tablets (Niaspan®). We believe that our success with these products, along with existing alliances, has established us as a strong distribution partner creating the foundation for continued productive partnership alliances in the future.
Ability to Develop Successful Products and Achieve Scale in Production. We believe that our ability to select viable products for development, efficiently develop such products, including obtaining any applicable regulatory approvals and achieve economies of scale in production are critical to our success in the generic pharmaceutical industry. We intend to focus on long-term profitability driven in part by securing market positions where fewer competitors are expected.
Strong Track Record of Obtaining Regulatory Approvals for New Products. During the past three fiscal years, we have received 17 approved ANDAs from the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”). Although the timing of ANDA approvals by the FDA is uncertain, we currently expect to receive several more during Fiscal 2019. These regulatory approvals will enable us to manufacture and supply a broader portfolio of generic pharmaceutical products.
Efficient Development Systems and Manufacturing Expertise for New Products. We believe that our manufacturing expertise, low overhead expenses and skilled product development can help us remain competitive in the generic pharmaceutical market. We intend to dedicate significant capital toward developing new products because we believe our success is linked to our ability to continually introduce new generic products into the marketplace.
Reputation for Regulatory Complianceregulatory compliance. We have a strong track record of regulatory compliance. We believe that we have strong effective regulatory compliance capabilities and practices due toto: (1) the hiring of qualified individuals, and(2) the implementation of strongcomprehensive Standard Operating Procedures (“SOP”), (3) adherence to current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMP”). and (4) operating an owned manufacturing network less complex than larger firms. Our agility in responding quickly to market events and a reputation for regulatory compliance positionpositions us to avail ourselves of market opportunities as they are presented to us.materialize.
In addition, narcotics which are classified by the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) as “controlled drugs” are subject to a rigorous regulatory compliance regimen. We have been granted a license from the DEA to import raw concentrated poppy straw for conversion into commercial APIs. Such licenses are renewed annually and non-compliance could result in a license not being renewed. As a result, we believe that our strong reputation for regulatory compliance allows us to have a competitive edge in managing the production and distribution of controlled drugs.
Business Strategies
Continue to Broaden our Product Lines Through Internal Development and Strategic Partnerships.
We are focused on increasing our market share in the generic pharmaceutical industry while concentrating additional resources on the development of new products, including controlled substance products. We continue to improve our financial performance by expanding our line of generic products, increasing unit sales to current customers, creating manufacturing efficiencies and managing our overhead and administrative costs.
We have three primary strategies for expanding our product offerings: (1) deploying our experienced R&D staff to develop products in-house; (2) entering into product development agreements or strategic alliances with third-party product developers and formulators; and (3) purchasing ANDAs or New Drug Application’s (“NDA”) from other manufacturers. We expect that each strategy will facilitate our identification, selection and development of additional pharmaceutical products that we may distribute through our existing network of customers.
Due to the expiration of the JSP Distribution Agreement in March 2019, management is re-assessing its overall business strategies. Although management cannot predict with certainty the precise impact its plans will have on offsetting the loss of the JSP Distribution Agreement, management is continuing to finalize plans to offset the impact of the loss on a short- and long-term basis. These plans currently include, among other things, an emphasis on reducing cost of sales, R&D and SG&A expenses; continuing to accelerate new product launches; increasing the level of strategic partnerships; and reducing capital expenditures. Management will also continue its emphasis on accelerating ANDA filings. Management also plans to attempt, at the appropriate time, to refinance a significant portion of its outstanding long-term debt to reduce principal repayment requirements and eliminate existing financial covenants, which will increase related interest expense, but will positively impact cash flows.
In certain situations, we may increase our focus on particular specialty markets within the generic pharmaceutical industry. By narrowing our focus to specialty markets, we can provide product alternatives in categories with relatively fewer market participants. We plan to strengthen our relationships with strategic partners, including providers of product development research, raw materials, APIs and finished products. We believe that mutually beneficial strategic relationships in such areas, including potential financing arrangements, partnerships, joint ventures or acquisitions, could enhance our competitive advantages in the generic pharmaceutical market.
In Fiscal 2018, the Company filed its first NDA for Numbrino (C-Topical® Solution).
In 2016, the Company announced a strategic partnership with YiChang HEC ChangJiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, an HEC Group company, to co-develop a biosimilar insulin pharmaceutical product for the U.S. market. The product is currently in development. The Company plans to manage the clinical and regulatory steps specific for an FDA approval to market and will have the exclusive U.S. marketing rights to the product. In addition, we will market other generic products developed by HEC with several launches expected over the next few years.
We have several existing supply and development agreements with both international and domestic companies; in addition, we are currently in negotiations on similar agreements with additional companies through which we can market and distribute future products. We intend to capitalize on our strong customer relationships to build our market share for such products.
Mergers and Acquisitions.
We evaluate potential mergers and acquisitions opportunities that are a strategic fit and accretive to our business. During Fiscal 2016, we completed the acquisition of KUPI, the former subsidiary of global biopharmaceuticals company UCB S.A. KUPI is a U.S. specialty pharmaceuticals manufacturer focused on the development of products that are difficult to formulate or utilize specialized delivery technologies. Strategic benefits of the acquisition include expanded manufacturing capacity, a diversified product portfolio and pipeline and complementary R&D expertise.
Leverage our Flexibility and Speed.
We believe flexibility and speed in decision-making are critical success factors in the generic industry. Our mid-sized scale and relatively less complex organizational structure as a U.S. based organization results in a more nimble response to securing market opportunities.
Leverage Ability to Vertically Integrate as a Manufacturer, Supplier and Distributor of Controlled Substance Products.
In July 2008, the DEA granted our subsidiary, Cody Labs, a license to directly import concentrated poppy straw for conversion into opioid-based commercial APIs for use in various dosage forms for pain management. The value of this license comes from the fact that, to date, only a limited number of companies in the U.S. have been granted this license. This license, along with Cody Labs’ expertise in API development and manufacture, allows the Company to perform in a market with barriers to entry, no foreign manufactured dosage form competition and limited domestic competition. Because of this vertical integration, the Company has direct control of its supply and the potential for a more competitive cost position. The Company can also leverage this vertical integration not only for direct supply of opioid-based APIs, but also for the manufacture of non-opioid-based APIs.
The Company believes that the demand for pain management drugs will remain significant as the “Baby Boomer” generation ages. By concentrating on a selective portfolio that includes appropriate use pain management medications along with proper customer development, the Company is well-positioned to take advantage of this opportunity. The Company is currently vertically integrated on three products with several others in various stages of development.
Key Products
Key Products were selected based on current and future sales and profitability.
Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets
Levothyroxine Sodium tablets, which are used for the treatment of thyroid deficiency by patients of various ages and demographic backgrounds, are the most prescribed drug in the United States. The product is manufactured by JSP and distributed under the JSP Distribution Agreement and is produced and marketed in 12 potencies. Net sales of Levothyroxine Sodium tablets totaled $245.9 million in fiscal year 2018. Levothyroxine is a narrow therapeutic index drug and very difficult to formulate and also requires multiple AB ratings to the various brands. This has resulted in a less competitive market environment for this molecule. In our distribution of these products, we primarily compete with two brand Levothyroxine Sodium products, AbbVie’s Synthroid® and Pfizer’s Levoxyl®, as well as generic products from Mylan and Sandoz, each of which have multiple AB ratings as required. As described above, on August 20, 2018, the Company announced that the JSP Distribution Agreement which expires on March 23, 2019 will not be renewed.
Fluphenazine Tablets
Fluphenazine tablets are used for the treatment of schizophrenia and other mental disorders. Net sales of Fluphenazine tablets totaled $53.3 million in fiscal year 2018. Currently, our primary generic competitor for this drug is Mylan.
Digoxin Tablets
Digoxin tablets, which are used to treat congestive heart failure in patients of various ages and demographics, are produced and marketed with two different potencies. This product is manufactured by JSP and we distribute it under the JSP Distribution Agreement. Net sales of this product totaled $4.9 million in fiscal year 2018. The product is highly potent based on Environment, Health & Safety (“EHS”), regulations and its API availability is limited given there are only two active suppliers, based on the FDA Drug Master File (“DMF”) list. In our distribution of these products, we compete with generic products from Mylan, Amneal and Hikma, as well as the brand product Lanoxin® distributed by Concordia and an authorized generic (“AG”) distributed by Endo. On August 20, 2018, the Company announced that the JSP Distribution Agreement which expires on March 23, 2019 will not be renewed.
Metoprolol Succinate ER Tablets
Metoprolol Succinate ER is a beta-blocker that affects the heart and circulation (blood flow through arteries and veins). It is used to treat angina (chest pain) and hypertension (high blood pressure). It is also used to treat or prevent heart attack. This product is the generic version of Toprol XL®. Net sales of Metoprolol Succinate ER totaled $25.9 million in fiscal year 2018. We compete with generic products from Teva and Dr. Reddy’s Labs.
Ursodiol Capsules
Ursodiol Capsules are produced and marketed in 300 mg capsules and are used for the treatment of gallstones. Net sales of Ursodiol capsules totaled $20.3 million in fiscal year 2018. We compete with generic products from Teva, PureCap and Mylan.
Omeprazole Capsules
Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that decreases the amount of acid produced in the stomach. The product is a generic version of the branded drug Prilosec®. It is indicated for heartburn or irritation of the esophagus caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease. KUPI produces Omeprazole DR capsules in 10mg, 20mg and 40mg dosages. Net sales of Omeprazole capsules totaled $20.1 million in fiscal year 2018. In distributing this product, we compete primarily with Sandoz, Dr. Reddy’s Labs, Apotex and Zydus.
Pantoprazole Sodium DR Tablets
Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor that decreases the amount of acid produced in the stomach. The product is a generic version of the branded drug Nexium®. It is indicated for heartburn or irritation of the esophagus caused by gastroesophageal reflux disease. KUPI produces Pantoprazole tablets in 20mg and 40mg dosages. Net sales of Pantoprazole in fiscal year 2018 were $19.3 million. We complete primarily with products from Amneal, Aurobindo, Camber, Cadista, Prasco, Teva and Torrent.
Sumatriptan Nasal Spray
Sumatriptan Nasal Spray is indicated for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. This product is a generic version of Imitrex® Nasal Spray. The Company distributes the 5mg and 20mg dosages. Net sales of Sumatriptan Nasal Spray totaled $42.1 million in fiscal year 2018. We compete with the generic product from Sandoz.
Diclofenac Sodium Tablets
Diclofenac Sodium Tablets is a non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (“NSAID”) indicated to relieve pain, inflammation and joint stiffness caused by arthritis. It is the generic version of Voltaren SR®. We launched this product in the last month of fiscal year 2018 with net sales of $1.1 million. It is manufactured by Dexcel Pharma and we distribute under our distribution agreement with Dexcel Pharma. We compete along with the generic product from Oceanside.
Metolazone Tablets
Metolazone is a thiazide-like diuretic. It is primarily used to treat congestive heart failure and high blood pressure. It is the generic version of Zarocolyn®. We launched this product in the last month of fiscal year 2018 with net sales of $1.5 million. We compete with generic products from Mylan and Sandoz.
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride ER
Methylphenidate ER is a central nervous system stimulant indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”) in children six years of age and older, adolescents and adults up to the age of 65. The product is a generic version of the branded drug Concerta®, which is currently marketed by Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc, and competes with a generic product marketed by Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, TriGen, Amneal and Mylan as well as an AG marketed by Teva. The product was approved by the FDA in 2013 with a therapeutic equivalence rating of AB, meaning the FDA deemed it therapeutically equivalent to the brand-name drug, Concerta®. Net sales of Methylphenidate ER tablets totaled $33.2 million in fiscal year 2018.
Per a teleconference win November 2014 the FDA informed KUPI that it was changing the therapeutic equivalence rating of its product from “AB” (therapeutically equivalent) to “BX.” A BX-rated drug is a product for which data are insufficient to determine therapeutic equivalence; it is still approved and can be prescribed, but the FDA does not recommend it as automatically substitutable for the brand-name drug at the pharmacy.
During the November 2014 teleconference, the FDA also asked KUPI to either voluntarily withdraw its product or to conduct new bioequivalence (“BE”) testing in accordance with the recommendations for demonstrating bioequivalence to Concerta proposed in a new draft BE guidance that the FDA issued earlier that November. The Company agreed to conduct new BE studies per the new draft BE guidance. KUPI submitted the data from those studies to the FDA in June 2015 and met with the FDA to discuss the results in July 2015.
On October 18, 2016, the Company received notice from the FDA that it will seek to withdraw approval of the Company’s ANDA for Methylphenidate ER. The FDA’s notice includes an opportunity for the Company to request a hearing on this matter. Following the Company’s request under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) for documents to support its request for a hearing, the FDA granted an extension to submit all data, information and analyses upon which the request for a hearing relies. The FDA has not yet made a decision as to whether to grant a hearing to the Company.
The Company intends to continue working with the FDA to regain the “AB” rating, and in the meantime, maintain the drug on the U.S. market with a BX rating. However, there can be no assurance as to when or if the Company will regain the “AB” rating or be permitted to remain on the market. If the Company were to receive the “AB” rating, net sales of the product could increase subject to market factors existing at that time. The Company also agreed to potential acquisition-related contingent payments to UCB related to Methylphenidate ER if the FDA reinstates the AB-rating and certain sales thresholds are met. Such potential contingent payments are set to expire after December 31, 2020.
In August 2018, the Company entered into an exclusive perpetual licensing agreement with Andor Pharmaceuticals, LLC for Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended Release (ER) tablets USP (CII) in 18 mg, 27 mg, 36 mg and 54 mg strengths. Andor’s pending ANDA of Methylphenidate included all bioequivalence metrics recommended by the FDA and is expected to be approved as an AB-rated generic equivalent to the brand Concerta®.
Under the licensing agreement, Lannett will primarily provide sales, marketing and distribution support of Andor’s Methylphenidate ER product, for which it will receive a percentage of the net profits. See Note 22 “Subsequent events” for more information.
Pain Management Products
Cocaine Topical® Solution (“C-Topical®”), a vertically integrated product, is produced and marketed under a preliminary new drug application (“PIND”) in two different strengths and two different size containers. C-Topical® is utilized primarily for the anesthetization of the patient during ear, nose or throat surgery, sinuplasty and in emergency rooms.
In December 2017, a competitor received approval from the FDA to market and sell a Cocaine Hydrochloride topical product. This approval affects the Company’s right to market and sell its unapproved Grandfathered C-Topical product. According to FDA guidance, the FDA typically allows the marketing of unapproved products for up to one year following the approval of an NDA for the product. Subsequently, the Company would not be permitted to market and sell its unapproved C-Topical product.
The competitor’s Cocaine Hydrochloride topical product first appeared in FDA’s Orange Book in January 2018, and the Orange Book listing was updated in February 2018 to include New Chemical Entity (NCE) exclusivity. Under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, the grant of NCE exclusivity provides that additional applications for approval of the same product under Section 505(b)(2) may not be submitted to the FDA for approval before the expiration of five years from the date of the approval of the first application. Because the Company submitted its application for approval prior to the date of approval of the competitor’s Cocaine Hydrochloride topical application, the Company does not believe the NCE exclusivity will apply to the Company’s application. The FDA continues to review the Company’s application, and in July 2018 issued a Complete Response Letter which required an additional study and other information. The Company cannot say for certain when or if the application will be approved.
At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate impact that these developments will have on its business and financial performance, including but not limited to any possible price reductions should the competitor commence marketing and selling its C-Topical product in the future, for how long the Company will continue to be permitted to market and sell C-Topical or the possible effect on the Company’s pending NDA application.
Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution is produced and marketed in three different size containers. We manufacture this product at Cody Labs and are currently finishing the manufacturing methods and capabilities to make the API. This drug is prescribed primarily for the management of pain in adults.
Oxycodone HCl Oral Solution (“Oxycodone”) was produced until August 20, 2012 and marketed until October 4, 2012 in two different size containers, at which point, as a result of FDA enforcement actions against all market participants, the Company voluntarily exited the market. Prior to the enforcement actions the Company had submitted an ANDA to the FDA and subsequently received approval and commenced shipping Oxycodone in September 2014. This drug is prescribed primarily for the management and relief of moderate to moderately severe pain.
Other products in the pain management franchise include Hydromorphone HCl tablets, which we are vertically integrated, and Codeine Sulfate tablets. Additionally, the Company added several pain management products through the Silarx acquisition. Net sales of pain management products totaled $23.0 million in Fiscal Year 2018.
Validated Pharmaceutical Capabilities
KUPI’s 432,000 square foot Seymour, Indiana facility contains approximately 107,000 square feet of manufacturing space as well as a leased 116,000 square foot temperature/humidity controlled storage warehouse. The Seymour facility has had satisfactory inspections conducted by the FDA and EMA and similar regulatory authorities of Japan, Taiwan, Brazil, China, Korea and Turkey. Since 2008, KUPI has made significant improvements to its facility and equipment. These improvements enabled the facility to increase production from approximately 1.2 billion doses in 2008 to over 2.7 billion doses in 2014. Prior to the acquisition, KUPI also completed a 20,000 square foot expansion of the facility which increased capacity to 3.9 billion doses.
In connection with the acquisition of Silarx, the Company acquired an 110,000 square foot manufacturing facility located in Carmel, New York, which sits on 25.8 acres of land. The facility specializes in liquid products and currently houses manufacturing, packaging, quality and research and development and has capacity for additional manufacturing space, if needed.
The manufacturing facility of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cody Labs, consists of a 73,000 square foot structure located on approximately 15.0 acres in Cody, Wyoming. The Cody Labs’ manufacturing facility specializes in API and controlled substance production and currently has capacity for further expansion, both inside and outside the existing structure. In June 2018, the Company announced the Cody Restructuring Plan, as further described in Note 3. “Restructuring Charges”.
Lannett owns several facilities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Certain administrative functions, manufacturing and research and development facilities are located in a 31,000 square foot facility at 9000 State Road, Philadelphia, PA. A second, 63,000 square foot facility is located within one mile of the State Road facility at 9001 Torresdale Avenue, Philadelphia, PA and contains our analytical research and development and quality control laboratories. The facility has capacity for additional manufacturing, packaging or laboratory space, if needed. We also own a building at 13200 Townsend Road in Philadelphia, PA consisting of 66,000 square feet on 7.3 acres of land which is currently used for warehouse space and shipping. In June 2018, the Company initiated a process to begin consolidating all shipping and receiving activities to its Seymour, Indiana facility. The consolidation of shipping and receiving will allow us to vacate the 13200 Townsend Road facility in the future.
We have adopted many processes in support of regulations relating to cGMPs in the last several years and we believe we are operating our facilities in substantial compliance with the FDA’s cGMP regulations. In designing our facilities, full attention was given to material flow, equipment and automation, quality control and inspection.
We continue to pursue “Quality by Design” for improving and maintaining product quality in our pharmaceutical development and manufacturing facilities, which is outlined in the FDAFood and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) report entitled, “Pharmaceutical Quality for the 21st21st Century: A Risk-Based Approach.” The FDA periodically inspects our production facilitiesoperations to determine our compliance with the FDA’s manufacturing standards. Typically, after completing itsapplicable laws and regulations. During an inspection, the FDA willmay issue aan inspection report, entitled a “Form 483,” containing potentially objectionable observations arising from an inspection. Additionally, at the close of each inspection, FDA will issue an Establishment Inspection Report (“EIR”) that details the final classification for each site, either No Action Indicated (“NAI”), Voluntary Action Indicated (“VAI”), or Official Action Indicated (“OAI”). The FDA’s observations may be minor or severe in nature and the degree of severity is generally determined by potential consequences to the consumer. By strictly complying with cGMPs and the various FDA guidelines as well as adherence to our Standard Operating Procedures, we have never received a cGMP Warning Letter in more than 70 years of business.
Experienced management team. We have been focused on maintaining and augmenting the quality of our management team in anticipation of continuing growth. Our team is distinctive with regard to their generic industry tenure and extensive U.S. focus. We have hired experienced personnel from large, established, pharmaceutical companies as well as competing generic companies to complement the skills and knowledge of the existing management team. As we continue to grow, additional personnel may need to be added to our management team and we intend to hire the best people available to expand the knowledge base and expertise within our team.
Business Strategies
Focus on the large U.S. generic market and larger U.S. brand market opportunities
We believe generics are the foundation of efficient pharmaceutical care and are estimated to be approximately 90% of all U.S. pharmaceutical prescription volume with an IQVIA value of approximately $56 billion for the 12-month period ending June 30, 2021. While that estimate likely well exceeds actual market size, Lannett’s opportunity is significant relative to Lannett’s size. Meanwhile, the brand market subject to eventual genericization exceeds $450 billion, according to IQVIA. As new branded products become off patent and existing generic product opportunities become available, we will seek to generate new business through both internal development and partnerships.
6
We are focused on increasing our market share in the U.S. generic pharmaceutical industry while directing additional resources on the development of new products. We look to grow revenue and profitability by expanding our line of generic products, increasing unit sales to current customers, creating manufacturing efficiencies and managing our overhead and administrative costs.
Emphasis on in-line execution
We have a broad portfolio of existing generics and we continually look to optimize the share and value of our existing portfolio. We look to capitalize on competitor supply disruptions, which occur frequently in the industry of both a shorter and longer duration. We seek to reduce the cost of our products through various life cycle management approaches including increasing the efficiency of our plant, and our product manufacturing yields, and lowering incipient and API costs from third-party suppliers.
Strategic expansion of our product offering
We have three primary strategies for expanding our product offerings: (1) entering into product development partnerships or strategic alliances with third-party product developers and formulators; (2) deploying our experienced R&D staff to develop products in-house; and (3) purchasing ANDAs or New Drug Applications (“NDA”) from other manufacturers. We expect that each strategy will facilitate our identification, selection and development of additional pharmaceutical products that we may sell to our existing network of customers.
We are focused on the U.S. market, but our business development efforts are global. Our relationships with global partners and our track record of delivering regulatory and commercialization expertise to global biopharmaceutical companies is a competitive advantage and offers significant opportunities for future growth. Between January 2018 and June 2021, the number of alliances that our business development efforts have secured increased significantly and we have acquired or in-licensed over 75 ANDA products as a result of these efforts.
One of our major strategic partnerships was struck in October 2019 when the Company announced it had entered into an exclusive U.S. distribution agreement for the therapeutically equivalent generic of ADVAIR DISKUS® (Fluticasone Propionate – Salmeterol Xinafoate Powder Inhaler) of Respirent Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd. ADVAIR DISKUS had U.S. sales of $3.6 billion for the 12 months ending July 2019, according to IQVIA, although the accessible generic market is expected to be lower. We currently estimate the generic accessible market to be approximately $1 billion, annually. The Company submitted to the FDA an ANDA for the product on April 1, 2021. Under the agreement, the Company will commence U.S. distribution of the product after FDA approval. The Company will make an upfront payment, as well as future milestone payments, and receive a portion of the net profits once it commences distribution of the product. The term of the agreement is 12 years, which begins upon commencement of distribution.
As an expansion in our partnership with Respirent, in August 2020, the Company announced it had entered into an exclusive U.S. distribution agreement for a second product, the therapeutically equivalent generic of Flovent® Diskus® (Fluticasone Propionate Powder Inhaler). U.S. sales of Flovent Diskus were $96 million for the 12 months ending June 2021 according to IQVIA, although actual accessible generic market values are expected to be lower. Early development of the product is underway. Subsequently, the Company announced further expansion of the relationship to target the therapeutically equivalent generic to SPIRIVA® handihaler®. U.S. sales of SPIRIVA handihaler were approximately $1.5 billionfor the 12 months ending June 2021 according to IQVIA.
7
In 2016, the Company announced a strategic partnership with YiChang HEC ChangJiang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd, an HEC Group company, to co-develop a biosimilar insulin glargine pharmaceutical product for the U.S. market. The product is currently in development, and a healthy human Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic modeling (“PK/PD”) clinical trial was conducted in South Africa. The study met all of its primary endpoints. Subsequently, Lannett held a Biosimilar Biological Product Development Type II meeting with the FDA. The feedback was consistent with our expectation. The Company plans to manage the clinical and regulatory steps for FDA approval and will have the exclusive U.S. marketing rights to the product. Drug substance and drug product have been produced at a newly commissioned facility and we are targeting completing an Investigational New Drug Application (“IND”) towards the end of calendar year 2021. We currently expect to file the product in early calendar year 2023 and, if approved, launch the product in the first half of calendar year 2024. In February 2021, the Company expanded its strategic relationship with HEC and added a new co-development agreement for biosimilar Insulin Aspart. In addition, we will market other generic products developed by HEC with several launches expected over the next few years.
In August 2020, the Company announced it had commenced distributing Cediprof, Inc’s (“Cediprof”) Levothyroxine product under an interim exclusive supply and distribution agreement. The interim supply agreement covers the period from July 2020 through the start of the previously executed 10-year exclusive supply and distribution agreement with Cediprof to distribute Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets USP, which was entered into in July 2019 and becomes effective August 2022. The Company also entered into an exclusive U.S. distribution agreement with IBSA Institut Biochemique SA and commenced the launch of the authorized generic of Tirosint® (Levothryoxine Sodium Capsules USP) in November 2020. Levothyroxine is one of the largest volume generics sold in the United States.
We have several other existing supply and development agreements with both international and domestic companies; in addition, we are currently in negotiations on similar agreements with other companies through which we can market and distribute future products. We intend to continue to capitalize on our strong customer relationships to build our market share for such products.
Internal research and development is also an important prong of our growth strategy. Examples of internally developed products include Chlorpromazine and butalbital, acetaminophen and caffeine (“BAC”), and co-development projects such as Sumatriptan Nasal Spray. Opportunistically, we may increase our focus on specialty markets within the pharmaceutical industry. For example, in Fiscal 2018, the Company filed its first NDA for Numbrino (cocaine hydrochloride solution), which was approved by the FDA in January 2020.
Key Products
Key products were selected based on current and future sales and profitability. In aggregate, the 11 products noted below accounts for approximately 47% of Lannett sales in Fiscal 2021. While these products are our top selling products, margins may vary well above or below average margins based on changing competitive circumstances as well as product partnership royalties, where applicable.
Fluphenazine Tablets
Fluphenazine tablets are used for the management of manifestations of psychotic disorders. Net sales of Fluphenazine tablets represented approximately 7% of total net sales in fiscal year 2021.
Posaconazole DR Tablets
Posaconazole DR tablets are used to prevent fungal infections in people who have a weak immune system resulting from certain treatments or conditions. The product is the generic version of Noxafil®. Net Sales of Posaconazole DR represented approximately 12.1% of total net sales in fiscal year 2021.
Verapamil SR Tablets
Verapamil SR tablets are a calcium channel blocker used in the treatment of high blood pressure, arrhythmia and angina. We market the authorized generic of Verelan PM.
8
Methylphenidate CD Capsules
Methylphenidate CD is a central nervous system (“CNS”) stimulant indicated for the treatment of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (“ADHD”). This product is the authorized generic version of the brand Metadate CD®.
Omeprazole Capsules
Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor. The product is a generic version of the branded drug Prilosec®. It is indicated for the treatment of certain diseases of the esophagus and stomach ulcers as well as pathologic hypersecretory conditions. KUPI produces Omeprazole DR capsules in 10mg, 20mg and 40mg dosages.
Pantoprazole Sodium DR Tablets
Pantoprazole is a proton pump inhibitor. The product is a generic version of the branded drug Nexium®. It is indicated for the treatment of certain diseases of the esophagus and pathological hypersecretory conditions. KUPI produces Pantoprazole tablets in 20mg and 40mg dosages.
Sumatriptan Nasal Spray
Sumatriptan Nasal Spray is indicated for the acute treatment of migraine attacks. This product is a generic version of Imitrex® Nasal Spray. The Company distributes the 5mg and 20mg dosages.
Metolazone Tablets
Metolazone is a diuretic medication. It is indicated for the treatment of hypertension, alone or in combination with other anti-hypertensives. We market the authorized generic version of Zaroxolyn®. This product is currently on extended back order due to an API supply issue.
Amphetamine IR Tablets
Amphetamine IR Tablets are used to treat ADHD and narcolepsy. It is the generic version of Adderall.
Cocaine Hydrochloride Solution
In December 2017, a competitor received approval from the FDA to market and sell a Cocaine Hydrochloride topical product. This approval affects the Company’s right to market and sell its unapproved cocaine hydrochloride solution product. In March 2018, in accordance with its guidance, the FDA requested the Company to cease manufacturing and distributing its unapproved cocaine hydrochloride solution product as a result of an approved product on the market. The Company committed to not manufacture or distribute cocaine hydrochloride 10% solution, which has not been sold during Fiscal 2019, as of April 15, 2019 and agreed to cease manufacturing its unapproved cocaine hydrochloride 4% solution on June 15, 2019 and cease distributing the product on August 15, 2019.
We filed a NDA for Numbrino® Nasal Solution in Fiscal 2018. We received approval in January 2020 and launched the product in March 2020.
The competitor filed a series of Citizen Petitions and lawsuits beginning in 2019, first attempting to block the FDA from approving our NDA for cocaine hydrochloride solution and, following the FDA’s approval, seeking a court order requiring FDA to withdraw approval of the NDA. To date, the competitor has been unsuccessful, although litigation has not yet been concluded. Refer to Note 10 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and Contingencies” for further information regarding the pending litigation.
9
Levothyroxine Tablets
Levothyroxine tablets is a thyroid hormone medication that is used to treat underactive thyroid (hypothyroidism) and other conditions. It is deemed bioequivalent to Levoxyl®, Synthroid®, Unithroid® and Euthyrox®.
Levothyroxine Capsules
Levothyroxine capsules are soft gel capsules used to treat patients with hypothyroidism and other conditions. It is the generic version of the branded drug Tirosint®.
Sales & Marketing and Customers
We enter into contracts with Group Purchasing Organizations (“GPOs”) to sell our products to their members who are our direct and indirect customers. The largest GPOs are ClarusOne, Red Oak Sourcing and Walgreens Boots Alliance Development. Net sales to these GPOs accounted for 73% of total net sales in fiscal year 2021 and 74% in fiscal year 2020.
We sell our pharmaceutical products to generic pharmaceutical distributors, drug wholesalers, chain drug retailers, private label distributors, mail-order pharmacies, other pharmaceutical companies, managed care organizations, hospital buying groups, governmental entities and health maintenance organizations. The pharmaceutical industry’s largest wholesale distributors, Amerisource Bergen, McKesson and Cardinal Health, each associated with one of the GPOs mentioned above, accounted for 27%, 21% and 12%, respectively, of our total net sales in fiscal year 2021, 25%, 23% and 11%, respectively, of our total net sales in fiscal year 2020 and 21%, 18% and 10%, respectively, of our total net sales in fiscal year 2019.
Sales to wholesale customers include “indirect sales,” which represent sales to third-party entities, such as independent pharmacies, managed care organizations, hospitals, nursing homes and group purchasing organizations, collectively referred to as “indirect customers.”
We enter into definitive agreements with our indirect customers to establish pricing for certain covered products. Under such agreements, the indirect customers independently select a wholesaler from which to purchase the products at these agreed-upon prices. We will provide credit to the wholesaler for the difference between the agreed-upon price with the indirect customer and the wholesaler’s invoice price. This credit is called a “chargeback.” For more information on chargebacks, see the section entitled “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K. These indirect sale transactions are recorded on our books as sales to wholesale customers.
We promote our products through direct sales, trade shows and group purchasing organizations’ bidding processes. We also have a limited number of products that are marketed as part of our customers’ “private label” programs. Private label products are manufactured by Lannett but distributed to the customer with a label typically containing the name and logo of the customer. Private label allows us to leverage our internal sales efforts by using the sales and marketing efforts of those customers.
Strong and dependable customer relationships have created a positive platform for us to increase our sales volumes. Historically and in fiscal years 2021, 2020 and 2019, our advertising expenses have been modest. When our sales representatives make contact with a customer, we will generally offer to supply the customer our products at fixed prices. If accepted, the customer’s purchasing department will coordinate the purchase, receipt and distribution of the products throughout its distribution centers and retail outlets. Once a customer accepts our supply of a product, the customer typically expects a high standard of service, including timely receipt of products ordered, availability of convenient, user-friendly and effective customer service functions and maintaining open lines of communication.
10
We believe that retail-level consumer demand dictates the total volume of sales for most of our various products. In the event that wholesale and retail customers adjust their purchasing volumes, we believe that consumer demand will be fulfilled by other wholesale or retail sources of supply. As a result, we attempt to develop and maintain strong relationships with most of the major retail chains, wholesale distributors and mail-order pharmacies in order to facilitate the supply of our products through whatever channel the consumer prefers. Although we have agreements with customers governing the transaction terms of our sales, generally there are no minimum purchase quantities applicable to these agreements. Our practice of maintaining adequate inventory levels, employing a responsive order filling system and prioritizing timely fulfillment of those orders have contributed to a strong reputation among our customers as a dependable supplier of high-quality generic pharmaceuticals.
Competition
The manufacturing and distribution of generic pharmaceutical products is a highly competitive industry. Competition is based primarily on a reliable supply and price. In addition to competitive pricing, our competitive advantages are our ability to provide strong and dependable customer service by maintaining adequate inventory levels, employing a responsive order filling system and prioritizing timely fulfillment of orders. We look to ensure that our products are available from national wholesale, chain drug and mail-order suppliers as well as our own warehouse. The modernization of our facilities, hiring of experienced staff and implementation of inventory and quality control programs have improved our competitive cost position. Our primary competitors across our product portfolio are Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Mylan N.V., and Amneal Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Validated Pharmaceutical Capabilities
The Company’s 432,000 square foot Seymour, Indiana facility contains approximately 107,000 square feet of manufacturing space as well as a leased 116,000 square foot temperature/humidity-controlled storage warehouse. The Seymour facility has had satisfactory inspections conducted by the FDA and EMA and similar regulatory authorities of Japan, Taiwan, Brazil, China, Korea and Turkey. As of June 30, 2021, the facility has a production capacity of approximately 4.0 billion doses based on our current product mix and plant configuration.
The Company has an 110,000 square foot manufacturing facility located in Carmel, New York, which sits on 25.8 acres of land. The facility specializes in liquid products and currently houses manufacturing, packaging, quality and research and development and has capacity for additional manufacturing space, if needed.
Lannett owns two facilities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The research and development facilities are located in a 31,000 square foot facility at 9000 State Road and a second, 63,000 square foot facility that is located within one mile of the State Road facility at 9001 Torresdale Avenue, Philadelphia, PA. The latter facility contains our analytical research and development and quality control laboratories. We have adopted many systems and processes to ensure adherence to FDA requirements and we believe we are operating our facilities in substantial compliance with the FDA’s cGMP regulations.
Raw Materials and Finished Goods Suppliers
Our use of raw materials in the production process consists of pharmaceutical chemicals in various forms that are often available from several sources. In addition to the raw materials we purchase for the production process, we purchase certain finished dosage inventories. We sell these finished dosage form products directly to our customers along with the finished dosage form products manufactured in-house. We generally take precautionary measures to avoid a disruption in raw materials and finished goods, such as finding secondary suppliers for certain raw materials or finished goods when available and maintaining adequate inventory levels.
11
Over time, we have entered into supply and development agreements with Summit Bioscience LLC, Respirent Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., HEC Pharm Group, Dexcel Pharma, Elite Pharmaceuticals, RivoPharm and various other international and domestic companies. The Company is currently in negotiations on similar agreements with other companies and is actively seeking additional strategic partnerships, through which it will market and distribute products manufactured in-house or by third parties. The Company also continues to assess product acquisitions that are a strategic fit and accretive to the business.
Research and Development Process
Over the past several years, we have invested heavily in R&D projects. The costs of these R&D efforts are expensed during the periods incurred. We believe that such costs may be recovered in future years when we receive approval from the FDA to manufacture and distribute such products. We have embarked on a plan to grow in future years, which includes organic growth to be achieved through our R&D efforts. We expect that our growing list of generic products under development will help drive future growth. Over the past several years, we have hired additional personnel in product development, production and formulation. The following steps outline the numerous stages in the generic drug development process:
1.)Formulation and Analytical Method Development. After a drug candidate is selected for future sale, product development scientists perform various experiments to incorporate excipients with the APIs to product a robust, stable and bioequivalent dosage form that will then, not only be therapeutically equivalent to the brand name drug, but match its size and shape as per FDA guidance. These experiments will result in the creation of a number of product formulations to determine which formula will be most suitable for our subsequent development process. Various formulations are tested in the laboratory to measure results against the innovator brand drug. During this time, we may use reverse engineering methods on samples of the innovator drug to determine the type and quantity of inactive ingredients. During the formulation phase, our R&D chemists begin to develop an analytical, laboratory testing method. The successful development of this test method will allow us to test developmental and commercial batches of the product in the future. All of the information used in the final formulation, including the analytical test methods adopted for the generic drug candidate, will be included as part of the Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (“CMC”) section of the ANDA submitted to the FDA.
2.)Scale-up and Tech Transfer. After product development, scientists and the R&D chemists agree on a final formulation for use in moving the drug candidate forward in the developmental process, we then attempt to increase the batch size of the product. The batch size represents the standard magnitude to be used in manufacturing a batch of the product. The determination of batch size affects the amount of raw material that is used in the manufacturing process and the number of expected dosages to be created during the production cycle. We attempt to determine batch size based on the amount of active ingredient in each dosage, the available production equipment and unit sales projections. The scaled-up batch is then generally produced in our commercial manufacturing facilities. During this manufacturing process, we document the equipment used, the amount of time in each major processing step and any other steps needed to consistently produce a batch of that product.
3.)Bio equivalency and Clinical Testing. After a successful scale-up of the generic drug batch, we schedule and perform generally required bio equivalency testing on the product and in some cases, clinical testing, if required by the FDA. These procedures, which are generally outsourced to third parties, include testing the absorption rate and extent of the generic product in the human bloodstream compared to the absorption of the innovator drug. The results of this testing are then documented and reported to us to determine the “success” of the generic drug product. Success, in this context, means that we are able to demonstrate that our product is comparable to the innovator product in dosage form, strength, route of administration, quality, performance characteristics and intended use.
1.) | Formulation and analytical method development. After a drug candidate is selected for future sale, product development scientists perform various experiments to incorporate excipients with the APIs to produce a robust, stable and bioequivalent dosage form that will be therapeutically equivalent to the brand name drug and meet all FDA requirements for approval. These experiments will result in the creation of a number of product formulations to determine which formula will be most suitable for our subsequent development process. Various formulations are tested in the laboratory to measure results against the innovator brand drug. During this time, we may use reverse engineering methods on samples of the innovator drug to determine the type and quantity of inactive ingredients. During the formulation phase, our R&D chemists begin to develop an analytical, laboratory testing method. The successful development of this test method will allow us to test developmental and commercial batches of the product in the future. All of the information used in the final formulation, including the analytical test methods adopted for the generic drug candidate, will be included as part of the Chemistry, Manufacturing and Controls (“CMC”) section of the ANDA submitted to the FDA. |
2.) | Scale-up and tech transfer. After product development, our R&D formulators and our R&D chemists agree on a final formulation for use in moving the drug candidate forward in the developmental process, we then attempt to increase the batch size of the product. The batch size represents the standard magnitude to be used in manufacturing a batch of the product. The determination of batch size affects the amount of raw material that is used in the manufacturing process and the number of expected dosages to be created during the production cycle. We attempt to determine batch size based on the amount of active ingredient in each dosage, the available production equipment and unit sales projections. The scaled-up batch is then generally produced in our commercial manufacturing facilities. During this manufacturing process, we document the equipment used, the amount of time in each major processing step and any other steps needed to consistently produce a batch of that product. |
3.) | Bio equivalency and clinical testing. After a successful scale-up of the generic drug batch, we schedule and perform generally required bio equivalency testing on the product and in some cases, clinical testing, if required by the FDA. These procedures, which are generally outsourced to third parties, include testing the absorption rate and extent of the generic product in the human bloodstream compared to the absorption of the innovator drug. The results of this testing are then documented and reported to us to determine the “success” of the generic drug product. Success, in this context, means that we are able to demonstrate that our product is comparable to the innovator product in dosage form, strength, route of administration, quality, performance characteristics and intended use. |
Bioequivalence (meaning that the product has the same blood levels and dosage form as the innovator drug) and a stable formula are the primary requirements for a generic drug approval (assuming the manufacturing plant is in compliance with the FDA’s cGMP regulations). Lengthy and costly clinical trials proving safety and efficacy, which are required by the FDA for NDAs (and may include 505(b)(2)NDAs), are typically unnecessary for generic companies. If the results are successful, we will continue the collection of information and documentation for assembly of the drug application.
12
4.)SubmissionTable of the ANDA for FDA Review and Approval. An ANDA is a comprehensive submission that contains, among other things, data and information pertaining to the proposed labeling, active pharmaceutical ingredient, excipients, container/closure, drug product formulation, drug product testing specification, methodology and results. Bioequivalence study reports are also included in the ANDA submission.Contents
4.) | Submission of the ANDA for FDA review and approval. An ANDA is a comprehensive submission that contains, among other things, data and information pertaining to the proposed labeling, active pharmaceutical ingredient, excipients, container/closure, drug product formulation, drug product testing specification, methodology and results. Bioequivalence study reports are also included in the ANDA submission. |
Our ANDAs and NDAs are submitted to the FDA electronically using the most current eCTDElectronic Common Technical Document standards. Lannett strives to achieve a first cycle approval for each ANDA under the Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012 (“GDUFA”) review metrics.
Sales and Customer Relationships
We sell our pharmaceutical products to generic pharmaceutical distributors, drug wholesalers, chain drug retailers, private label distributors, mail-order pharmacies, other pharmaceutical manufacturers, managed care organizations, hospital buying groups, governmental entities and health maintenance organizations. We promote our products through direct sales, trade shows and bids. Our practice of maintaining adequate inventory levels, employing a responsive order filling system and prioritizing timely fulfillment of those orders have contributed to a strong reputation among our customers as a dependable supplier of high quality generic pharmaceuticals.
Management
We have been focused on enhancing the quality of our management team in anticipation of continuing growth. As part of our growth, we have established corporate and non-corporate officer positions. We have hired experienced personnel from large, established, brand pharmaceutical companies as well as competing generic companies to complement the skills and knowledge of the existing management team. As we continue to grow, additional personnel may need to be added to our management team. We intend to hire the best people available to expand the knowledge base and expertise within our team.
Current Products
As of the date of this filing, we manufactured and/or distributed the following products:
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
(1) Distributed under the JSP Distribution Agreement, which will expire in March 2019
(2) Distributed under a distribution agreement with Aralez Pharmaceuticals
*Products not listed each represent less than 1% of total net sales in Fiscal 2018
Unlike brand, innovator companies, we generally do not develop new molecules. However, we have filed and received two patents for APIs at our Cody, Wyoming manufacturing facility, with additional patents in process.
In fiscal year 2018,2021, we receivedlaunched several approvalsproducts from the FDA.internal and external sources. The following summary contains more specific details regarding our latest ANDA approvals.product launches. Market data was obtained from Wolters Kluwer and IMS.
On July 13, 2017, we received FDA approval for Cyproheptadine Hydrochloride Syrup (Cyproheptadine Hydrochloride Oral Solution, USP) 2 mg/5 mL, the therapeutic equivalentIQVIA although actual generic market sizes are expected to the reference listed drug, Periactin® Syrup, 2 mg/5 mL of Merck and Co., Inc. For the 12 months ended May 2017, total U.S. sales of Cyproheptadine Hydrochloride Syrup, 2 mg/5 mL, at Average Wholesale Price (AWP) were approximately $6 million, according to IMS.be smaller.
| | | | | | | | |
| | |
| |
| | Total Market Size as of | |
Product Launch |
| Month of Launch |
| Equivalent Brand |
| June 2021 ($ in millions) | ||
1 | Mexiletine Capsules |
| July, 2020 |
| Mexitil® | | $ | 15.1 |
2 | Levothyroxine Tablets |
| August, 2020 |
| Synthroid®/Levoxyl® | | $ | 806.0 |
3 | Lidocaine 2% Solution |
| August, 2020 |
| Xylocaine® Viscous Solution | | $ | 17.1 |
4 | Levorphanol Tablets - 2mg |
| August, 2020 |
| Levo-Dromoran® | | $ | 24.1 |
5 | Cocaine HCl Nasal Solution (AG) |
| September, 2020 |
| Numbrino® | | $ | 36.5 |
6 | Azithromycin |
| October, 2020 |
| Zithromax® | | $ | 83.0 |
7 | Levothyroxine Capsules |
| November, 2020 |
| Tirosint® | | $ | 122.3 |
8 | Methadone Solution (Sugar Free) 30ml |
| November, 2020 |
| Methadose™ (Mallinkrodt) | | $ | 0.8 |
9 | Chlorpromazine Tablets |
| February, 2021 |
| Thorazine® | | $ | 101.9 |
10 | Levorphanol Tablets - 3mg |
| February, 2021 |
| Levo-Dromoran® | | $ | 3.0 |
11 | Venlafaxine ER Tablets - 75mg |
| April, 2021 |
| Effexor XR® | | $ | 9.4 |
12 | Fluvastatin ER Tablets |
| June, 2021 |
| Lescol XL® | | $ | 8.1 |
On September 1, 2017, we received FDA approval for Esomeprazole Magnesium Delayed-Release Capsules USP, 20 mg and 40 mg, the therapeutic equivalent to the reference listed drug, Nexium Delayed-Release Capsules, 20 mg and 40 mg of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP. For the 12 months ended July 2017, total U.S. sales of Esomeprazole Magnesium Delayed-Release Capsules USP, 20 mg and 40 mg, at AWP were approximately $1.4 billion, according to IMS.
On September 25, 2017, we received FDA approval for Dexmethylphenidate Hydrochloride Tablets, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg, the therapeutic equivalent to the reference listed drug, Focalin® Tablets, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg, of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. For the 12 months ended July 2017, total U.S. sales of Dexmethylphenidate Hydrochloride Tablets, 2.5 mg, 5 mg, and 10 mg, at AWP were approximately $34 million, according to IMS.
On September 25, 2017, we received FDA approval for Oxycodone and Acetaminophen Tablets, USP, 5 mg/325 mg and 10 mg/325 mg, the therapeutic equivalent to the reference listed drug, Percocet® Tablets, 5 mg/325 mg and 10 mg/325 mg, of Vintage Pharmaceuticals, LLC. For the 12 months ended July 2017, total U.S. sales of Oxycodone and Acetaminophen Tablets, USP, 5 mg/325 mg and 10 mg/325 mg, at AWP were approximately $571 million, according to IMS.
On September 28, 2017, we received FDA approval for Lansoprazole Delayed-Release Capsules USP, 15 mg and 30 mg, the therapeutic equivalent to the reference listed drug, Prevacid® Delayed-Release Capsules, 15 mg and 30 mg, of Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Additionally, on September 29, 2017, we received FDA approval for Lansoprazole Delayed-Release Capsules USP, 15 mg (OTC), the bioequivalent to the reference listed drug, Prevacid® 24HR Delayed-Release Capsules, 15 mg, of GlaxoSmithKline. For the 12 months ended July 2017, total U.S. sales at AWP of Lansoprazole Delayed-Release Capsules USP, 15 mg and 30 mg, was approximately $76 million, according to IMS.
On May 18, 2018, we received FDA approval for Dronabinol Capsules USP, 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg, the therapeutic equivalent to the reference listed drug, Marinol® Capsules 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg of AbbVie Inc. For the 12 months ended March 2018, total U.S. sales of Dronabinol Capsules USP, 2.5 mg, 5 mg and 10 mg, was approximately $120 million, according to IMS.
On May 25, 2018, we received FDA approval for Levofloxacin Oral Solution USP, 25 mg/mL, the therapeutic equivalent to the reference listed drug, Levaquin® Oral Solution, 25 mg/mL, of Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. For the 12 months ended April 2018, total U.S. sales of Levofloxacin Oral Solution USP, 25 mg/mL, was approximately $6 million, according to IMS.
We have additional products of various dosage forms currently under development. Our developmental drug products are intended to treat a diverse range of indications. The products under development are at various stages in the development cycle—formulation, scale-up, clinical testing and/or FDA review.
The cost associated with each product that we are currently developing is dependent on numerous factors, including but not limited to, the complexity of the active ingredient’s chemical characteristics, the price of the raw materials and the FDA-mandated requirement of bioequivalence studies (depending on the FDA’s Product Specific Guidance). With the introduction of GDUFA and additional guidance issued by the FDA, the cost to develop a new generic product varies but now totalscan total several million dollars.
In addition, we currently own several ANDAs for products that are not currently marketed and noted as Discontinued in FDA’s Orange Book. Occasionally, we review such discontinued products to determine if the market potential for any of these products has recently changed to make it attractive for us to reconsider manufacturing and selling. If we decide to commercially market one of these products, we evaluate the requirements necessary for commercial launch, including a filing strategy to properly report the relaunch to the FDA so that the product is moved to the Active section of the Orange Book.
In addition to the efforts of our internal product development group, we have contracted with numerous outside firms for the formulation and development of several new generic drug products. These outsourced R&D products are at various stages in the development cycle—formulation, analytical method development and testing and manufacturing scale-up. These products include orally administered solid dosage products, injectables and nasal delivery products that are intended to treat a diverse range of medical indications.
We intend to ultimately transfer the formulation technology and manufacturing process for some of these R&D products to our own commercial manufacturing sites. We initiated these outsourced R&D efforts to complement the progress of our own internal R&D efforts.
13
We recorded R&D expenses of $29.2$24.2 million in fiscal year 2018, $42.12021, $30.0 million in fiscal year 20172020 and $45.1$38.3 million in fiscal year 2016.2019. These amounts included expenses associated with bioequivalence studies, internal development resources as well as outsourced development. While we manage all R&D from our principal executive office in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, we have also been taking steps to capitalize on favorable development costs in other countries. We have strategic relationships with various companies that either act as contract research organizations or API suppliers as well as dosage form manufacturers. In addition, U.S.-based research organizations have been engaged for product development to enhance our internal development. Fixed payment arrangements are established between Lannett and these research organizations and in some cases include a royalty provision. Development payments are normally scheduled in advance, based on attaining development milestones.
Human Capital Management
Raw MaterialsWe provide affordable medicines to improve the quality of life of our patients. It is our mission and Finished Goods Suppliersthe foundation of our Lannett Cares culture. Our mission guides the way we work and we strive to put people and patients at the forefront of what we do. We are thus committed to providing a positive, inclusive and team-oriented workplace. We encourage and promote open communication with our teams, aspire to strong social connections, and provide learning and growth opportunities to our employees. We want our people, our business and our corporate responsibility to reflect the core values of Lannett.
Lannett helps bring together employees with a wide variety of backgrounds, skills and cultures. Combining such a wealth of talent and resources creates the diverse and dynamic teams that consistently drive our success. As of June 30, 2021, we have more than 810 full-time employees. Employees identifying as female represent approximately 44% of our employee population and approximately 41% of employees at the leadership level (employees at manager and above) at June 30, 2021. These ratios are consistent with approximately 45% and approximately 39% respectively as of June 30, 2020. Approximately 40% of the employees holding positions at the Vice President level and above identify as female.
Our useEmployee rewards, growth and development
We strive to ensure that our employees are provided equal opportunity and equal treatment. With a focus on all our employees, we offer a variety of raw materialsresources and rewards to support their health and well-being and career aspirations. Lannett is committed to attracting and retaining the best talent by providing competitive benefits, supporting continued learning for employees, and encouraging employees to gain exposure across many aspects of our business.
Lannett recognizes the importance, contributions and performance of its employees in pursuing, achieving and supporting the productioncompany’s business objectives. Therefore, Lannett is committed to designing and maintaining compensation policies and programs that ensure equitable job and position evaluation, and competitive and performance-based pay. We have an annual short-term incentive program for eligible employees to be rewarded, in part, based on their individual goal performance, rather than being based solely on the Company’s financial performance. Under this program, an employee’s potential bonus is a blend of corporate goals and individual goals. We are committed to remaining transparent on payout opportunities and, as part of the quarterly earnings release process, consists of pharmaceutical chemicals in various forms that are generally available from several sources.Lannett communicates progress toward our corporate goals. In addition to the raw materialsannual short-term incentive opportunity, we purchaseare committed to rewarding employees for exceptional performance during the production process,year including (1) celebrating length of service milestones, (2) granting recognition awards and (3) for eligible employees, an annual discretionary long-term incentive award. During 2020, we purchasealso awarded bonuses to certain finished dosage inventories.essential employees who consistently came to work at our plants during the COVID-19 pandemic to produce the affordable medicines we make for patients.
14
In addition to bonus opportunities, we offer a competitive benefits package, including medical, dental, and vision care. We sell these finished dosage form products directlyoffer a variety of wellness programs including a personal health survey and individual health coaching, fitness challenges and incentives for incremental HSA contributions, on-site health screenings, and wellness webinars. We are also focused on supporting our employees in reaching their personal financial goals. We have a 401k defined contribution plan (the “Plan”) available for substantially all employees, which includes a matching contribution during each Plan year. Further, we offer an Employee Stock Purchase Program (“ESPP”), which allows eligible employees to our customers along with the finished dosage form products manufactured in-house. We generally take precautionary measures to avoid a disruption in raw materials and finished goods, such as finding secondary suppliers for certain raw materials or finished goods when available and maintaining adequate inventory levels.
The Company’s primary finished goods inventory supplier is JSP, in Bohemia, New York. Purchases of finished goods from JSP accounted for 37% of our inventory purchases in fiscal year 2018, 36% in fiscal year 2017 and 52% in fiscal year 2016. On March 23, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with JSP for the exclusive distribution rights in the United States to the current line of JSP products, in exchange for 4.0 millionpurchase shares of the Company’s common stock. stock at a discount to nurture an ownership mentality in everyone who works at the Company. Additionally, in 2021, we provided access to financial wellness webinars with Morgan Stanley, which included a variety of topics including college planning, budgeting, investing and retirement.
Moreover, Lannett is committed to supporting our employees in their continued learning and career development. We offer employees training for their current positions and opportunities to access learning platforms. We also provide tuition reimbursement to eligible employees for all or a portion of the costs incurred by the employee to attend educational courses related to the successful performance of their duties. Employees are encouraged to seek advancement opportunities and obtain promotions, transfers and career guidance from all levels of management within Lannett and Human Resources.
Across all other aforementioned matters, we understand the importance of employee satisfaction and aim to improve the employee experience. We regularly conduct and share engagement surveys with employees to obtain feedback on various matters, including executive leadership effectiveness, communication, total rewards, and development and recognition. Various actions taken by management have been a direct result of suggestions provided as part of these surveys and follow-up focus groups. During the COVID-19 pandemic, for example, we spent time to gauge the pulse of our employees and their needs, including childcare needs, using surveys and Q&A sessions.
The JSP products covered under the agreement included Butalbital, Aspirin, Caffeine with Codeine Phosphate Capsules USP; Digoxin Tablets; and Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets, sold generically and under the brand-name Unithroid®. On August 19, 2013,Company’s total employee turnover rate for fiscal year 2021, which the Company entered into an agreement with JSP to extend its initial contract to continuedefines as the exclusive distributorratio of the number of separated employees during the year to the average active employees during fiscal year 2021, was approximately 37%, up from approximately 17% in fiscal year 2020. The turnover rate at our Philadelphia, PA locations was approximately 17%, up from approximately 8% in fiscal year 2020 and our Carmel, NY facility turnover rate was approximately 11%, down from approximately 18% in fiscal year 2020. Competing demands for manufacturing skills, some pandemic burnout and more job opportunities resulted in approximately 47% turnover in our Seymour, IN manufacturing site, up from 20% in fiscal year 2020. The turnover rate in Seymour, IN was much higher than our historical average. While a portion of this increase is related to the 2020 Restructuring Plan, implemented in July 2020, the Company continues to focus on employee retention by establishing a purpose-driven and inclusive culture, investing in our employees, and providing transparency and opportunities for feedback to management.
Employee safety
A safe, healthy and secure work environment is our top priority for all employees, contractors and visitors. Our goal is to conduct business with minimal injuries and incidents and maintain compliance with applicable rules and codes. Management, as well as the Board of Directors, regularly review and monitor metrics on our safety performance. We also use these metrics to identify hazards for correction before an incident or injury occurs. If employees have concerns regarding safety, they are expected to report the concerns to their manager, to a member of the executive team, or by contacting the Company’s anonymous whistleblower hotline.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we have continued to prioritize safety and follow local, state, federal and CDC mandates. When possible, employees have been directed to work from home throughout the duration of the pandemic. Across our work sites, we implemented enhanced cleaning and sanitizing procedures and provided additional personal hygiene supplies and personal protective equipment such as rubber gloves, N95 respirators and powered air-purifying respirator that are in line with Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (“CDC”) recommendations. We have also implemented thermal screening for employees and visitors entering our facilities. Employees are required to adhere to the CDC guidelines, social distancing and any employee experiencing any symptoms of COVID-19 is required to stay home and seek medical attention. We will continue to monitor COVID-19 protocols and the safety of our employees, contractors, and visitors as CDC recommendations evolve and restrictions are lifted or raised in our various states of operations.
15
Corporate social responsibility
Lannett believes that it is important to invest in the communities where we live, work and operate. Every year, Lannett and its employees give time and money to registered charities, schools, service clubs and community organizations. Our Charitable Contributions Policy focuses on employee involvement and is structured to provide (1) direct cash donations, (2) monetary matching for cash or goods donated by employees, and (3) monetary matching for time volunteered by employees. Lannett and our employees have participated in various charitable events throughout fiscal year 2021, including virtual charity walks, clothing and food drives, and blood drives. In addition, we have partnered with various charitable organizations to donate excess and short-dated product that would otherwise be unused. In the last two years, Lannett and its employees have raised or donated over $0.6 million of pharmaceutical products, valued at wholesale acquisition cost, to a variety of worthy organizations, with our most recent emphasis on assisting local communities impacted by COVID-19. We believe in giving back to the people, causes and organizations that make a difference in the lives of others and that inspire our employees.
Environmental Matters
Lannett is committed to a more sustainable future with a reduced environmental footprint, effective use of natural resources and a multi-pronged approach to managing carbon intensity that strengthens our quality-oriented focus of providing affordable medicines to patients who depend on them. As the manufacturer of high-quality generic medicines, we are focused on developing, manufacturing and distributing safe and cost-effective medicines in the United StatesStates. Because we operate primarily in the U.S., our supply chain is more compact and resilient than many of three JSP products: Butalbital, Aspirin, Caffeineour competitors and has a smaller corresponding carbon footprint. As a U.S.-based, publicly traded company, we are also subject to various strict U.S. compliance requirements. We follow regulations issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”), and various state environmental agencies in the U.S. We have consistently had a good record of compliance with Codeine Phosphate Capsules USP; Digoxin Tablets USP;these agencies. The majority of our large competitors that manufacture and Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets USP. The amendmentare headquartered abroad are not always subject to the original agreement extendedsame set of requirements.
Our product portfolio has been migrating to lower relative volume products that, as a result of their market and production requirement, have a smaller environmental impact than higher relative volume products. We still strive to reduce the termamount of natural resources consumed and minimize the initial contract, which was dueamount of facility and pharmaceutical-related waste generated and disposed of in our communities. Measures include implementing projects that reduce the total amount of energy & natural resources utilized and improving manufacturing operations to expire on March 22, 2014, for five years through March 23, 2019.improve production output per unit of resources used.
In connection with the amendment, the Company issuedaddition, we participate in a total of 1.5 million shares of the Company’s common stockdrug takeback program, which provides channels for consumers to JSPreturn unused prescriptions in an effort to divert waste from landfills and its designees. The Company recorded a $20.1 million expense in cost of sales, which represented the fair value of the shares on August 19, 2013. Both Lannett and JSP have the right to terminate the contract if one of the parties does not cure a material breach of the contract within thirty (30) days of notice from the non-breaching party. On August 20, 2018, the Company announced that the JSP Distribution Agreement which expires on March 23, 2019 will not be renewed.
Over time, we have entered into supply and development agreements with JSP, Summit Bioscience LLC, HEC Pharm Group, Andor Pharmaceuticals LLC, Dexcel Pharma, Aralez Pharmaceuticals (“Aralez”) and various other international and domestic companies.water supply. The Company is currently in negotiations on similar agreements with other companiesdeveloping our plan to address climate change and is actively seeking additional strategic partnerships, through which it will market and distribute products manufactured in-house or by third parties. The Company plansintends to continue evaluating potential merger and acquisition opportunities as well as product acquisitions that areissue a strategic fit and accretive to the business.
Customers and Marketing
We sell our products primarily to wholesale distributors, generic drug distributors, mail-order pharmacies, group purchasing organizations, chain drug stores and other pharmaceutical companies. The pharmaceutical industry’s largest wholesale distributors, Amerisource Bergen, McKesson and Cardinal Health, accounted for 29%, 17% and 5%, respectively, of our total net sales inreport during fiscal year 20182022 to address our goals and 28%, 21%metrics for the future. We expect to monitor and 6%, respectively, ofrevise these goals and metrics as the climate change landscape evolves over time. We also intend to communicate our total net sales in fiscal year 2017. Our largest chain drug store customer accounted for 6%performance against these metrics and 5% of total net sales in fiscal year 2018 and fiscal year 2017, respectively.
Sales to wholesale customers include “indirect sales,” which represent sales to third-party entities, such as independent pharmacies, managed care organizations, hospitals, nursing homes and group purchasing organizations, collectively referred to as “indirect customers.”
We enter into definitive agreementsbe transparent with our indirect customers to establish pricing for certain covered products. Under such agreements, the indirect customers independently select a wholesaler from which to purchase the products at these agreed-upon prices. We will provide credit to the wholesaler for the difference between the agreed-upon price with the indirect customer and the wholesaler’s invoice price. This credit is called a “chargeback.” For more information on chargebacks, see the section entitled “Critical Accounting Policies”progress in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K. These indirect sale transactions are recorded onimproving our books as sales to wholesale customers.environmental impact.
We promote our products through direct sales, trade shows and group purchasing organizations’ bidding processes. We also market our products through private label arrangements, under which we manufacture our products with a label containing the name and logo of our customer. This practice is commonly referred to as “private label.” Private label allows us to leverage our internal sales efforts by using the marketing services from other well-respected pharmaceutical competitors. The focus of our sales efforts is the relationships we create with our customer accounts.
Strong and dependable customer relationships have created a positive platform for us to increase our sales volumes. Historically and in fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016, our advertising expenses were immaterial. When our sales representatives make contact with a customer, we will generally offer to supply the customer our products at fixed prices. If accepted, the customer’s purchasing department will coordinate the purchase, receipt and distribution of the products throughout its distribution centers and retail outlets. Once a customer accepts our supply of a product, the customer typically expects a high standard of service, including timely receipt of products ordered, availability of convenient, user-friendly and effective customer service functions and maintaining open lines of communication.
We believe that retail-level consumer demand dictates the total volume of sales for various products. In the event that wholesale and retail customers adjust their purchasing volumes, we believe that consumer demand will be fulfilled by other wholesale or retail sources of supply. As a result, we attempt to develop and maintain strong relationships with most of the major retail chains, wholesale distributors and mail-order pharmacies in order to facilitate the supply of our products through whatever channel the consumer prefers. Although we have agreements with customers governing the transaction terms of our sales, generally there are no minimum purchase quantities applicable to these agreements.
Competition
The manufacturing and distribution of generic pharmaceutical products is a highly competitive industry. Competition is based primarily on a reliable supply and price. In addition to competitive pricing, our competitive advantages are our ability to provide strong and dependable customer service by maintaining adequate inventory levels, employing a responsive order filling system and prioritizing timely fulfillment of orders. We ensure that our products are available from national wholesale, chain drug and mail-order suppliers as well as our own warehouse. The modernization of our facilities, hiring of experienced staff and implementation of inventory and quality control programs have improved our competitive cost position.
We compete with other manufacturers and marketers of generic and brand-name drugs. Each product manufactured and/or sold by us has a different set of competitors. The list below identifies the companies with which we primarily compete with respect to each of our major products in Fiscal 2018:
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
*Distributed under the JSP Distribution Agreement, which will expire in March 2019.
Government Regulation
Pharmaceutical manufacturers are subject to extensive regulation by the federal government, including the FDA and, in cases of controlled substance products the DEA as well as other federal regulatory bodies and state governments. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”), the Controlled Substance Act (the “CSA”) and other federal statutes and regulations govern or influence the testing, manufacture, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval, pricing, advertising and promotion of our generic drug products. Non-compliance with applicable regulations can result in fines, product recalls and seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, personal and/or corporate prosecution and debarment and refusal of the government to approve NDAs.applications. The FDA also has the authority to revoke previously approved drug applications.
16
Generally, FDA approval is required before a drug can be marketed. A new drug is one not generally recognized by qualified experts as safe and effective for its intended use and is submitted to the FDA as a NDA. The FDA review process for new drugs is very extensive and requires a substantial investment to research and test the drug candidate. A less burdensome approval pathway, the ANDA, is used for generic drug products, the ANDA.products. Typically, the investment required to develop a generic drug is less costly than the new drug. Some drug productproducts may be submitted as a 505(b)(2) NDA, allowing some of the required research and testing to be waived by relying on FDA’s previous findings of safety and efficacy and literature. For additional information on the FDA approval pathways, refer to section 505(b)(1) and 505(b)(2) of the FD&C Act for NDAs, section 505(j) for ANDAs and resources available on the FDA website, www.fda.gov.
There are currently three ways to obtain FDA approval of a drug:
·New Drug Applications (NDA): Unless one of the two procedures discussed in the following sections is available, a manufacturer must conduct and submit to the FDA complete clinical studies to establish a drug’s safety and efficacy. The new drug approval process generally involves:
· completion of preclinical laboratory and animal testing in compliance with the FDA’s GLP regulations;
· submission to the FDA of an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application for human clinical testing, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin;
· performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug product for each intended use;
· satisfactory completion of an FDA pre-approval inspection of the facility or facilities at which the product is produced to assess compliance with the FDA’s cGMP regulations; and
· submission to and approval by the FDA of an NDA.
The results of preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and analytical data, are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND, which must become effective before human clinical trials may begin. Further, each clinical trial must be reviewed and approved by an independent Institutional Review Board. Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases that may overlap. These phases generally include:
· Phase I, during which the drug is introduced into healthy human subjects or, on occasion, patients and is tested for safety, stability, dose tolerance and metabolism;
· Phase II, during which the drug is introduced into a limited patient population to determine the efficacy of the product in specific targeted indications, to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage and to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks; and
· Phase III, during which the clinical trial is expanded to a larger and more diverse patient group at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites to further evaluate clinical efficacy, optimal dosage and safety.
The drug sponsor, the FDA, or the independent Institutional Review Board at each institution at which a clinical trial is being performed may suspend a clinical trial at any time for various reasons, including a belief that the subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk.
The results of preclinical animal studies and human clinical studies, together with other detailed information, are submitted to the FDA as part of the NDA. The NDA also must contain extensive manufacturing information. The FDA may disapprove the NDA if applicable FDA regulatory criteria are not satisfied or it may require additional clinical data. Once approved, the FDA may withdraw the product approval if compliance with pre- and post-market regulatory standards is not maintained or if problems occur or are identified after the product reaches the marketplace. In addition, the FDA may require post-marketing studies to monitor the effect of approved products and may limit further marketing of the product based on the results of these post-marketing studies.
The FDA has broad post-market regulatory and enforcement powers, including the ability to levy fines and civil penalties, suspend or delay issuance of approvals, seize or recall products and withdraw approvals.
Satisfaction of FDA new drug approval requirements typically takes several years and the actual time required may vary substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product or disease. Government regulation may delay or prevent marketing of potential products for a considerable period of time and/or require additional procedures which increase manufacturing costs. Success in early stage clinical trials does not assure success in later stage clinical trials. Data obtained from clinical activities is not always conclusive and may be subject to varying interpretations that could delay, limit, or prevent regulatory approval. Even if a product receives regulatory approval, later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product may result in restrictions on the product or even complete withdrawal of the product from the market.
·Abbreviated New Drug Applications: An ANDA is similar to an NDA except that the FDA generally waives the requirement of complete clinical studies of safety and efficacy. However, it may require bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. Bioavailability indicates the rate of absorption and levels of concentration of a drug in the bloodstream needed to produce a therapeutic effect. Bioequivalence compares one drug product with another and indicates if the rate of absorption and the levels of concentration of a generic drug in the body are within prescribed statistical limits to those of a previously approved drug. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, an ANDA may be submitted for a drug on the basis that it is the equivalent of an approved drug regardless of when such other drug was approved. The FDA will approve the generic product as suitable for an ANDA application if it finds that the generic product does not raise new questions of safety and effectiveness as compared to the innovator product. A product is not eligible for ANDA approval if the FDA determines that it is not equivalent to the referenced innovator drug, if it is intended for a different use, or if it is not subject to an approved Suitability Petition. However, such a product might be approved under an NDA, with supportive data from clinical trials.
In addition to establishing a new ANDA procedure, the Hatch-Waxman Act created statutory protections for approved brand-name drugs. Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, an ANDA for a generic drug may not be made effective until all relevant product and use patents for the brand-name drug have expired or have been determined to be invalid. Prior to this act, the FDA gave no consideration to the patent status of a previously approved drug.
Upon NDA approval, the FDA lists in its Orange Book the approved drug product and any patents identified by the NDA applicant that relate to the drug product. Any applicant who files an ANDA seeking approval of a generic equivalent version of a drug listed in the FDA’s Orange Book before expiration of the referenced patent(s), must certify to the FDA that (1) no patent information on the drug product that is the subject of the ANDA has been submitted to the FDA; (2) such patent has expired; (3) the date on which such patent expires; or (4) such patent is invalid or will not be infringed upon by the manufacture, use, or sale of the drug product for which the ANDA is submitted. This last certification is known as a paragraph IV certification. A notice of the paragraph IV certification must be provided to each owner of the patent that is the subject of the certification and to the holder of the approved NDA to which the ANDA refers. Before the enactment of the Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003 (the “MMA”), which amended the Hatch-Waxman Act, if the NDA holder or patent owner(s) asserted a patent challenge within 45 days of its receipt of the certification notice, the FDA was prevented from approving that ANDA until the earlier of 30 months from the receipt of the notice of the paragraph IV certification, the expiration of the patent, when the infringement case concerning each such patent was favorably decided in an ANDA applicant’s favor, or such shorter or longer period as may be ordered by a court. This prohibition is generally referred to as the 30-month stay. In some cases, NDA owners and patent holders have obtained additional patents for their products after an ANDA had been filed but before that ANDA received final marketing approval and then initiated a new patent challenge, which resulted in more than one 30-month stay. The MMA amended the Hatch-Waxman Act to eliminate certain unfair advantages of patent holders in the implementation of the Hatch-Waxman Act. As a result, the NDA owner remains entitled to an automatic 30-month stay if it initiates a patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days of its receipt of notice of a paragraph IV certification, but only if the patent infringement lawsuit is directed to patents that were listed in the FDA’s Orange Book before the ANDA was filed. An ANDA applicant is now permitted to take legal action to enjoin or prohibit the listing of certain of these patents as a counterclaim in response to a claim by the NDA owner that its patent covers its approved drug product.
If an ANDA applicant is the first-to-file a substantially complete ANDA with a paragraph IV certification and provides appropriate notice to the FDA, the NDA holder and all patent owner(s) for a particular generic product, the applicant may be awarded a 180-day period of marketing exclusivity against other companies that subsequently file ANDAs for that same product. A substantially complete ANDA is one that contains all the information required by the Hatch-Waxman Act and the FDA’s regulations, including the results of any required bioequivalence studies. The FDA may refuse to accept the filing of an ANDA that is not substantially complete or may determine during substantive review of the ANDA that additional information, such as an additional bioequivalence study, is required to support approval.
Such a determination may affect an applicant’s first-to-file status and eligibility for a 180-day period of marketing exclusivity for the generic product. The MMA also modified the rules governing when the 180-day marketing exclusivity period is triggered or forfeited and shared. Prior to the legislation, the 180-day marketing exclusivity period was triggered upon the first commercial marketing of the ANDA or a court decision holding the patent invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed. For ANDAs accepted for filing before March 2000, that court decision had to be final and non-appealable (other than a petition to the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari). In March 2000, the FDA changed its position in response to two court cases that challenged the FDA’s original interpretation of what constituted a court decision under the Hatch-Waxman Act. Under the changed policy, the 180-day marketing exclusivity period began running immediately upon a district court decision holding the patent at issue invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed, regardless of whether the ANDA had been approved and the generic product had been marketed. In codifying the FDA’s original policy, the MMA retroactively applies a final and non-appealable court decision trigger for all ANDAs filed before December 8, 2003 leaving intact the first commercial marketing trigger. As for ANDAs filed after December 8, 2003, the marketing exclusivity period is only triggered upon the first commercial marketing of the ANDA product, but that exclusivity may be forfeited under certain circumstances, including if the ANDA is not marketed within 75 days after a final and non-appealable court decision by the first-to-file or other ANDA applicant, or if the FDA does not tentatively approve the first-to-file applicant’s ANDA within 30 months.
In addition to patent exclusivity, the holder of the NDA for the listed drug may be entitled to a period of non-patent market exclusivity, during which the FDA cannot approve an ANDA. If the listed drug is a NCE, the FDA may not accept an ANDA for a bioequivalent product for up to five years following approval of the NDA for the NCE.
If the listed drug is not a NCE but the holder of the NDA conducted clinical trials essential to approval of the NDA or a supplement thereto, the FDA may not approve an ANDA for a bioequivalent product before expiration of three years. Certain other periods of exclusivity may be available if the listed drug is indicated for treatment of a rare disease or is studied for pediatric indications.
·Section 505(b)(2) New Drug Applications: For a drug that is identical to a previously approved drug, a prospective manufacturer need not go through the full NDA procedure. Instead, it may demonstrate safety and efficacy by relying on published literature and reports where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies not conducted by or for the applicant and for which the applicant has not obtained a right of reference. The Hatch-Waxman Act permits the applicant to rely upon certain preclinical or clinical studies conducted for an approved product. The manufacturer must also submit, if the FDA so requires, bioavailability or bioequivalence data illustrating that the generic drug formulation produces the same effects, within an acceptable range, as the previously approved innovator drug. Because published literature to support the safety and efficacy of post-1962 drugs may not be available, this procedure is of limited utility to generic drug manufacturers and the resulting approved product will not be interchangeable with the innovator drug as an ANDA drug would be unless bio equivalency testing were undertaken and approved by FDA. Moreover, the utility of Section 505(b)(2) applications have with the exception of “Grandfathered drugs” been diminished by the availability of the ANDA process, as described above.
Additionally, certain products marketed prior to the FDCA may be considered GRASE (“Generally Recognized As Safe and Effective”) or Grandfathered. GRASE products are those “old drugs that do not require prior approval from FDA in order to be marketed because they are generally recognized as safe and effective based on published scientific literature.” Similarly, Grandfathered products are those which “entered the market before the passage of the 1938 act or the 1962 amendments to the act.” Under the grandfather clause, such a product is exempted from the “effectiveness requirements [of the act] if its composition and labeling have not changed since 1962 and if, on the day before the 1962 amendments became effective, it was (1) used or sold commercially in the United States, (2) not a new drug as defined by the act at that time and (3) not covered by an effective application.”
Manufacturing cGMP Requirements
requirements
Among the requirements for a new drug approval, facilities identified in each application that perform operations related to the drug product, including drug substance manufacturers and outside contract facilities, must conform to FDA cGMP regulations. The FDA may perform general GMP and/or pre-approval inspections to assess a company’s compliance with cGMP regulations. These inspections include reviews of procedures, operations, and data used to support the application and ongoing drug product manufacturing and testing. FDA’s cGMP regulations require, among other things, quality control and quality assurance systems as well as the corresponding records and documentation. In complying with the evolving standards set forth in the cGMP regulations, we must continue to expend time, money and effort in many areas of the companyto ensure compliance.
Failure to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements subject a manufacturer to possible legal or regulatory action, including but not limited to, the seizure of non-complying drug products, injunctions,warning letters, consent decrees placing significant restrictions on or suspending manufacturing operations, injunctions, the seizure of non-complying drug products and/or civil and criminal penalties.
Adverse experiences with the product and certain non-compliance events may need to be reported to the FDA and could result in regulatory actions such as labeling changes or FDA request for application withdrawal or product removal.
Other Regulatory Requirements
regulatory requirements
With respect to post-market product advertising and promotion, the FDA imposes a number of complex regulations on entities that advertise and promote pharmaceuticals, which include, among others, standards for direct-to-consumer advertising, off-label promotion, industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities and promotional activities involving the internet. The FDA has very broad enforcement authority under the FDCA and failure to abide by these regulations can result in penalties, including the issuance of a warning letter directing entities to correct deviations from FDA standards, a requirement that future advertising and promotional materials be pre-cleared by the FDA and state and/or federal civil and criminal investigations and prosecutions. Some of our products require participation in Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (REMS) programs, including our opioid products.(“REMS”) programs. A shared system REMS encompasses multiple prescription drug products and is developed and implemented jointly by two or more companies marketing the same products. These programs can add significant costs for the Company, depending on market share and complexity of the program.
We are also subject to various laws and regulations regarding laboratory practices, the experimental use of animals and the use and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances in connection with our research. In each of these areas, as above, the FDA has broad regulatory and enforcement powers, including the ability to levy fines and civil penalties, suspend or delay issuance of approvals, seize or recall products and withdraw approvals.
Any one or a combination of FDA regulatory or enforcement actions against the Company could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
17
DEA Regulation
regulation
We maintain registrations and quota (limitations on purchases of controlled substances) with the DEA that enable us to receive, manufacture, store, develop, test and distribute controlled substances in connection with our operations. Controlled substances are those drugs that appear on one of five schedules promulgated and administered by the DEA under the CSA. The CSA governs, among other things, the distribution, recordkeeping, quota, handling, security and disposal of controlled substances. We are subject to periodic and ongoing inspections by the DEA and similar state drug enforcement authorities to assess our ongoing compliance with the DEA’s regulations. Any failure to comply with these regulations could lead to a variety of sanctions, including the revocation or a denial of renewal of our DEA registration or quota, injunctions, or civil or criminal penalties. We are subject to an allocation of national (aggregate) quota for several products in our portfolio. Our quota requests require DEA approval in full for us to meet our forecasted customer demands. The DEA may or may not approve our quota requests in full based on factors that we do not control.
Fraud and Abuse Lawsabuse laws
Because of the significant federal and state funding involved in the provision of health care services, including Medicare and Medicaid funding, Congress and state legislatures have enacted, and federal and state prosecutors actively enforce, a number of laws whose purpose is to eliminate fraud, abuse, and abusecorruption in federalthe health care programs.industry. Our business is subject to compliance with these laws, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Dodd-Frankincluding both federal and state level anti-kickback laws and statutes aimed at eliminating false or fraudulent claims for payment. In addition, we are subject to the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”)., which prohibits offering, promising, authorizing, or making payments to any foreign government official to obtain or retain business. Because health care systems in many countries are run and funded at least in part by the government, the FCPA applies to interactions with most healthcare professionals and procurement representatives in many countries. Other countries have enacted similar anti-bribery laws.
Anti-kickback statutes
Anti-Kickback StatutesOne of the primary federal laws aimed at curbing fraud and Federal False Claims Act
Theabuse in the federal health care program’s fraud and abuse law (sometimes referred to asprograms is the “Anti-Kickback Statute”Anti-Kickback Statute (“AKS”), which prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving, or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing or arranging for a good or service, for which payment may be made under a federal health care program such as Medicare, Medicaid or Medicaid.TRICARE. The definition of “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, and can take many forms besides cash or compensation, including for example gifts and entertainment, certain discounts, the furnishing of free supplies, equipment or services, credit arrangements, payment of cashrebates, and waivers of payments.payments, including copayments. For example, under the AKS, a pharmaceutical company is prohibited from offering, directly or indirectly, any remuneration to induce Medicare patients to purchase the company’s drugs or to induce physicians to prescribe the company’s drugs. Several courts have interpreted the statute’s intent requirement to mean that if any one purpose of an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals of federal health care covered business, the statute has been violated.violated, regardless of the existence of other legitimate purposes for the remuneration. In addition, the AKS may not even require proof of a kickback recipient’s motivation for accepting an illegal payment, so long as he or she accepts the kickback knowingly and willfully. Penalties for AKS violations include criminal penalties and civil sanctions such as fines, imprisonment, and possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid, and other federal health care programs. In addition, someclaims for services or goods resulting from kickback allegations have been claimed to violatearrangements are “false claims” within the Federalmeaning of the federal False Claims Act, discussed in more detail below.
18
The Anti-Kickback StatuteAKS is broad and prohibits many arrangements and practices that are lawful in businesses outside of the health care industry. Recognizing that the Anti-Kickback StatuteAKS is broad and may technically prohibit many innocuous or beneficial arrangements, Congress incorporated several statutory exceptions into the AKS’s framework, which protect certain types of business arrangements. Congress also authorized the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”) to issue a series of regulations, known as “safe“regulatory safe harbors.” TheseThe "safe harbor" regulations describe various payment and business practices that, although they potentially implicate the AKS, are not treated as offenses under the statute. Both the statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors issued by the OIG beginning in July 1991, set forth provisionsrequirements that, if all of their applicable requirements are met, will assure health care providers and other parties to the arrangement that they will not be prosecuted under the Anti-Kickback Statute.AKS. The failure of a transaction or arrangement to fit precisely within one or more safe harbors does not necessarily mean that it is illegal or that prosecution will be pursued.
illegal. However, conduct and business arrangements that do not fully satisfy each applicable safe harbor may result in increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities such as OIG.
Many states have adopted laws similar to the Anti-Kickback Statute.AKS. Some of these state prohibitions apply to referralreferrals of patients for health care items or services reimbursed by any source, not onlyincluding commercial payers and private pay patients.
The federal government is aggressive and particularly active in pursuing suspected violations of the Medicare and Medicaid programs.
Government officials have focused their enforcement efforts on marketing of health care services and products, among other activities and recently have brought casesAKS against companies and certain sales, marketing, and executive personnel, for allegedly offering unlawful inducements to potential or existing customers in an attempt to procure their business.business (i.e. to promote drug sales). Additionally, a number of courts have ruled that a transaction that violates the AKS is unenforceable as against public policy.
Another development affectingIn addition to applying federal and state anti-kickback statutes in enforcement actions involving the marketing of healthcare services and products, the federal government and various states also have enacted laws specifically regulating the sales and marketing practices of pharmaceutical companies. These laws and regulations may limit financial interactions between manufacturers and health care industry isproviders, require disclosure to the increased usefederal or state government and the public of such interactions (e.g. federal and state “Sunshine” laws), or require the Federaladoption of compliance standards or programs. Many of these laws and regulations contain ambiguous requirements or require administrative guidance for implementation and, given the lack of clarity, our activities could be subject to the penalties under the pertinent laws and regulations.
False claims act statutes
The federal False Claims Act (“FFCA”FCA”) and in particular, action brought pursuant to the FFCA’s “Whistleblower” or “Qui Tam” provisions. The FFCA imposes liability on any person or entity who, among other things, knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment by a federal health care program. The Qui Tam provisions of the FFCAFCA allow a private individualindividuals with evidence of fraud to bring actionsfile suits on behalf of the federal government alleging that the defendant has submitted a false claim to the federal government and to share in any monetary recovery. In recent years, the number of suits brought against health care providers by private individuals has increased dramatically.dramatically, and in Fiscal 2020, the federal government recovered more than $1.8 billion in judgements and settlements related to FCA violations in the health care industry. In addition to the FCA, various states have enacted false claims lawlaws analogous to the FFCA, although manyFCA, which similarly enable private individuals to bring claims on behalf of thesea state laws apply where a claimor local government that has been defrauded. Because the Medicaid program is submitted to any third-party payerjointly funded by the federal government and not merely athe states, for example, qui tam plaintiffs frequently pursue both federal health care program.and state law claims.
19
When an entity is determined to have violated the FFCA,FCA, it may be required to pay up to three times the actual damages sustained by the government, plus civil penalties.penalties in excess of $23,000 per claim, as adjusted annually. Liability arises, primarily, when an entity knowingly submits or causes another to submit a false or fraudulent claim for reimbursementpayment to the federal government. The definition of a “false” claim is broad: In addition to actual or objective falsity, a claim may be considered “false” for purposes of liability under the FCA based on an express or implied certification that the person or company who submitted the claim is in compliance with all applicable statutes, regulations, or government contract provisions. For example, the federal government has used the FFCAFCA to assert liability on the basis of inadequate care, kickbacks, and other improper referrals andreferrals; improper use of Medicare numbers when detailingby the provider of services, in addition to the more predictableservices; as well as allegations as toregarding misrepresentations with respect to the services rendered. In addition, the federal government has prosecuted companies under the FFCAFCA in connection with off-label promotion of products.products (because government health programs ordinarily do not cover “off-label” uses of medications). Our future activities relating to the reporting of wholesale or estimated retail prices of our products, the reporting of discount and rebate information and other information affecting federal, state, and third-party reimbursement of our products, and the sale and marketing of our products may be subject to scrutiny under these laws. We are unable to predict whether we will be subject to actions under the FFCAFCA or a similar state law, or the impact of such actions. However, the costs of defending such claims, as well as any sanctions imposed, could significantly affect our financial performance.
Foreign corrupt practices act
The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”)
The FCPA of 1977, as amended, was enacted for the purpose of making it unlawful for(the “FCPA”) and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions generally prohibit certain classes of persons and entities, to makeand their intermediaries, from making payments to foreign government officials to assist in obtainingobtain or retainingretain business. Specifically, the anti-bribery provisionsIn recent years, for example, pharmaceutical, medical device, and other health care companies have resolved FCPA allegations of thebribing government procurement officials to win tenders and/or bribing public health care providers to prescribe products. If we are found to be liable for FCPA prohibit the briberyor other violations, we could suffer from civil and criminal penalties or other sanctions, including contract cancellations or debarment, and loss of government officials.our reputation, any of which could have a significant impact on our business, financial condition, and operations.
HIPAA and Other Fraudother fraud and Privacy Regulationsprivacy regulations
The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) created two new federal crimes: health care fraud and false statements relating to health care matters. The HIPAA health care fraud statute prohibits, among other things, knowingknowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program, including private payors. A violationpayment programs. HIPAA’s extensive privacy and security regulations impose significant regulatory requirements on covered entities to acquire and implement information systems and to adopt business procedures and security measures designed to protect the privacy and security of this statute ispatients’ protected health information. These particular HIPAA requirements have had a felonysignificant financial impact on many sectors of the health care industry because they impose extensive new requirements and mayrestrictions on the use and disclosure of identifiable patient information, and the financial consequences of a data breach or unauthorized disclosure of patients’ protected health information, including data breaches caused by malicious third parties and inadvertent disclosures, can result in substantial civil fines, imprisonment and/or exclusion from government-sponsored programs.penalties and lawsuits, negative publicity, and costly remediation efforts imposed by the Office for Civil Rights of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The HIPAA false statements statute prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment and/or imprisonment.exclusion from government-sponsored programs.
Pricing
In the United States, our sales are dependent upon the availability of coverage and reimbursement for our products from third-party payors, including federal and state programs such as Medicare and Medicaid and private organizations such as commercial health insurance and managed care companies. Such third-party payors increasingly challenge the price of medical products and services and institutingcontinue to institute cost containment measures to control or significantly influence the purchase of medical products and services.
20
Over the past several years, the rising costs of providing health care services has triggered legislation to make certain changes to the way in which pharmaceuticals are covered and reimbursed, particularly by government programs. For instance, recent federal legislation and regulations have created a voluntary prescription drug benefit, Medicare Part D, which revised the formula used to reimburse health care providers and physicians under Medicare Part B and imposed significant revisions to the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program. These changes have resulted in and may continue to result in, coverage and reimbursement restrictions and increased rebate obligations by manufacturers.
In addition, there continues to be legislative and regulatory proposals at the federal and state levels directed at containing or lowering the cost of health care. Examples of how limits on drug coverage and reimbursement in the United States may cause reduced payments for drugs in the future include:
· changing Medicare reimbursement methodologies;
· revising drug rebate calculations under the Medicaid program;
· reforming drug importation laws;
· fluctuating decisions on which drugs to include in formularies; and
· requiring pre-approval of coverage for new or innovative drug therapies.
● | changing Medicare reimbursement methodologies; |
● | revising drug rebate calculations under the Medicaid program; |
● | reforming drug importation laws; |
● | fluctuating decisions on which drugs to include in formularies; and |
● | requiring pre-approval of coverage for new or innovative drug therapies. |
Also, over the last few years, several states have passed legislation or have proposed legislation that have imposed price reporting requirements for both generic and brand pharmaceutical products and that include price transparency, price increase notification and supplement rebate requirements.
We cannot predict the likelihood or pace of such additional changes or whether there will be significant legislative or regulatory reform impacting our products, nor can we predict with precision what effect such governmental measures would have if they were ultimately enacted into law. However, in general, we believe that legislative and regulatory reform activity likely will continue.
Current or future federal or state laws and regulations may influence the prices of drugs and, therefore, could adversely affect the prices that we receive for our products. Programs in existence in certain states seek to set prices of all drugs sold within those states through the regulation and administration of the sale of prescription drugs. Expansion of these programs, in particular, state Medicaid programs, or changes required in the way in which Medicaid rebates are calculated under such programs, could adversely affect the price we receive for our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, generic pharmaceutical drug prices have been the focus of increased scrutiny by certain states’ attorney generals,attorneys general, the U.S. Department of Justice and Congress. Decreases in health care reimbursements or prices of our prescription drugs could limit our ability to sell our products or could decrease our revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company believes that under the current regulatory environment, the generic pharmaceutical industry as a whole will be the target of increased governmental scrutiny, especially with respect to state and federal anti-trust and price-fixing claims.
See Note 1110 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and Contingencies” for a description of current state and federal anti-trust and price-fixing claims.
21
Other Applicable Laws
applicable laws
We are also subject to federal, state and local laws of general applicability, including laws regulating working conditions and the storage, transportation, or discharge of items that may be considered hazardous substances, hazardous waste, or environmental contaminants. We monitor our compliance with laws and we believe we are in substantial compliance with all regulatory bodies.
As a publicly-traded company, we are also subject to significant regulations and laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Since its enactment, we have developed and instituted a corporate compliance program based on what we believe are the current best practices and we continue to update the program in response to newly implemented or changing regulatory requirements.
Employees
As of June 30, 2018,2021, we had 1,251812 full-time employees.
Securities and Exchange Act Reports
We maintain a website at www.lannett.com. We make available on or through our website our current and periodic reports, including any amendments to those reports, that are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These reports include annual reportsAnnual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reportsQuarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and current reportsCurrent Reports on Form 8-K. This information is available on our website free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file the information with, or furnish it to, the SEC.
The contents of our website are not incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K and shall not be deemed “filed” under the Exchange Act.
22
Operational and Industry-specific Risks
A substantial portionThe generic pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive.
We face strong competition in our generic product business. Revenues and gross profit derived from the sales of generic pharmaceutical products tend to follow a pattern based on certain regulatory and competitive factors. For example, as a result of new competitors entering the market, sales of Fluphenazine and Posaconazole, two of our total net salestop products, decreased during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021.
Typically, as patents for brand-name products and related exclusivity periods expire or fall under patent challenges, the first generic manufacturer to receive regulatory approval for generic equivalents of such products is generally able to achieve significant market penetration. As competing off-patent manufacturers receive regulatory approvals on similar products or as brand manufacturers launch generic versions of such products (for which no separate regulatory approval is required), market share, revenues and gross profits are generated from products manufactured by JSPprofit typically decline, in some cases dramatically. Accordingly, the level of market share, revenue and gross profit attributable to a particular generic product is normally related to the number of competitors in that we distribute pursuant to an agreement with JSP,product’s market and the terminationtiming of that product’s regulatory approval and launch, in relation to competing approvals and launches. Consequently, we must continue to develop and introduce new products in a timely and cost-effective manner to maintain our revenues and gross margins.
If we are unable to successfully develop or commercialize new products on a timely basis, our revenues, gross margins and operating results will suffer.
Our future results of operations will depend to a significant extent upon our ability to successfully commercialize new generic products in a timely manner. There are numerous difficulties in developing and commercializing new products, including developing, testing and manufacturing products in compliance with regulatory standards in a timely manner; receiving requisite regulatory approvals for such products in a timely manner; the availability, on commercially reasonable terms, of raw materials, including active pharmaceutical ingredients (“APIs”) and other key ingredients; developing and commercializing a new product is time consuming, costly and subject to numerous factors that may delay or prevent the successful commercialization of new products; and commercializing generic products may be substantially delayed by unexpired patents covering the brand drug.
As a result of these and other difficulties, products currently in development by Lannett may or may not receive the regulatory approvals necessary for marketing. If any of our distributionproducts, when developed and approved, cannot be successfully or timely commercialized, our revenue, gross margins and operating results could be adversely affected. We cannot guarantee that any investment we make in developing products will be recouped, even if we are successful in commercializing those products.
We have and will continue to enter into strategic alliances and collaborations with third parties, including companies based outside of the U.S., for the commercialization of some of our drug candidates. If those collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to capitalize on the market potential of these drug candidates.
We previously have and will continue in the future to seek third-party collaborators for the commercialization of some of our drug candidates on a selected basis, which adds a level of complexity to our supply network. If we do enter into any such arrangements with any third parties, we will likely have limited control over the amount and timing of resources that our collaborators dedicate to the development of our drug candidates. Our ability to generate revenues from these arrangements will depend on our collaborators’ abilities and efforts to successfully perform the functions assigned to them in these arrangements. Many risks associated with relying on third-party collaborators for developing new products are beyond our control. For example, some of our collaboration partners may decide to make substantial changes to a product’s formulation or design, may experience supply interruptions or financial difficulties or may have limited financial resources. Any of the foregoing may delay the development of new products or interrupt their market supply. In addition, if a third-party collaborator on a new product terminates our collaboration agreement or does not perform under the agreement, we may experience delays and additional costs in developing or replacing that product.
23
In addition, Lannett has multiple collaborations with JSP will materially decreasepartners outside of the U.S. and is subject to certain risks associated with having partners’ operations located in foreign jurisdictions. It is difficult to predict the impact of geopolitical risks or other factors that may interrupt supply, regulatory approval and new product launches. Disruptions in our net sales,partners’ operations or any deterioration in the geopolitical environment as a result of the above risks or otherwise could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The development, approval process, manufacture and commercialization of biosimilar products involve unique challenges and uncertainties, and our failure to successfully introduce biosimilar products could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Net salesWe and our partners and suppliers are actively working to develop and commercialize biosimilar products, including biosimilar Insulin Glargine and biosimilar Insulin Aspart. Although the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (“BPCIA”) established a framework for the review and approval of JSPbiosimilar products totaled $253.1 millionand the FDA has begun to review and approve biosimilar product applications, there continues to be uncertainty regarding the regulatory pathway in fiscal year 2018. Of that amount, Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets USP net sales totaled $245.9 million,the U.S., with gross marginsthe FDA continuing to issue and revise guidance related to its interpretation and implementation of approximately 60%, in fiscal year 2018. As described above,the BPCIA. If we are unable to obtain FDA or other non-U.S. regulatory authority approval for our current distribution agreement with JSPproducts, we will be unable to market them. Access to and the supply of necessary biological materials may be limited, and government regulations restrict access to and regulate the transport and use of such materials.
Even if our biosimilar products are approved for marketing, the products may not be renewed when it expirescommercially successful, may require more time than expected to achieve market acceptance, and may not generate profits in amounts that are sufficient to offset the amount invested to obtain such approvals. Market success of biosimilar products will depend on March 23, 2019. Afterdemonstrating to regulators, patients, physicians and payors (such as insurance companies) that such products are safe and effective and yet offer a more competitive price or other benefit over existing therapies. In addition, manufacturers of biologic products may try to dissuade physicians from prescribing or accepting biosimilar products. If our development efforts do not result in the closedevelopment and timely approval of biosimilar products or if such products, once developed and approved, are not commercially successful, or if any of the above risks occur, our business, on August 17, 2018, JSP notified the Company that it will not extend or renew the JSP Distribution Agreement. This will significantly decrease our net sales,financial condition, results of operations and cash flows beginningcould be materially adversely affected.
If we are unable to obtain sufficient supplies from key suppliers that in some cases may be the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019.
We rely on an uninterrupted supplyonly source of finished products or raw materials, our ability to deliver our products to the market may be impeded.
We are required to identify the supplier(s) of all the raw materials for our products in our applications with the FDA. To the extent practicable, we attempt to identify more than one supplier in each drug application. However, some products and raw materials are available only from JSPa single source and, in some of our drug applications, only one supplier of products and raw materials has been identified, even in instances where multiple sources exist. To the extent any difficulties experienced by our suppliers cannot be resolved within a reasonable time and at reasonable cost, or if raw materials for a significant amountparticular product become unavailable from an approved supplier and we are required to qualify a new supplier with the FDA, our profit margins and market share for the affected product could decrease and our development and sales and marketing efforts could be delayed.
Our policies regarding returns, allowances and chargebacks and marketing programs adopted by wholesalers may reduce our revenues in future fiscal periods.
Consistent with industry practice, the Company establishes provisions for chargebacks, rebates, returns and other adjustments to gross sales. The provisions are primarily estimated based on historical experience, future expectations, contractual arrangements with wholesalers and indirect customers and other factors known to management at the time of accrual. However, we cannot ensure that our reserves are adequate or that actual product returns, allowances and chargebacks will not exceed our estimates.
Health care initiatives and other third-party payor cost-containment pressures have and could continue to cause us to sell our products at lower prices, resulting in decreased revenues.
Some of our sales through March 23, 2019. If we wereproducts are purchased or reimbursed by state and federal government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations, or HMOs, and managed care organizations, or MCOs. Third-party payors increasingly challenge pharmaceutical product pricing. There also continues to experiencebe a trend toward managed health care in the United States. Pricing pressures by third-party payors and the growth of organizations such as HMOs and MCOs could result in lower prices and a reduction in demand for our products.
24
One such governmental program, known as the 340B Program, requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to enter into an interruptionagreement, called a pharmaceutical pricing agreement (“PPA”), with the Secretary of Health and Human Services. Under the PPA, the manufacturer agrees to provide front-end discounts on covered outpatient drugs purchased by specified providers, called “covered entities,” that supply, our operating results would suffer.
serve the nation’s most vulnerable patient populations. Outpatient prescription drugs, over the counter drugs (accompanied by a prescription), and clinic-administered drugs within eligible facilities are covered.
In addition, legislative and regulatory proposals and enactments to reform health care and government insurance programs could significantly influence the manner in which pharmaceutical products and medical devices are prescribed and purchased. We expect there will continue to be federal and state laws and/or regulations, proposed and implemented, that could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for health care products and services. The extent to which future legislation or regulations, if any, relating to the health care industry or third-party coverage and reimbursement may be enacted or what effect such legislation or regulation would have on our business remains uncertain. Since its enactment, there have been numerous judicial, administrative, executive, and legislative challenges to certain aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”), and we expect there will be additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. For example, various portions of the ACA are currently undergoing legal and constitutional challenges in the United States Supreme Court. Additionally, the Trump administration issued various Executive Orders which eliminated cost sharing subsidies and various provisions that would impose a fiscal year 2018, 37%burden on states or a cost, fee, tax, penalty or regulatory burden on individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices. Finally, Congress has introduced several pieces of legislation aimed at significantly revising or repealing the ACA. Although a number of these and other proposed measures may require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, and the Biden administration may reverse or otherwise change these measures, Congress has indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative measures to control drug costs. It is unclear whether the ACA will be overturned, repealed, replaced, or further amended, although the Biden administration has signaled that it plans to build on the ACA and expand the number of people who are eligible for subsidies under it. It is unknown what form any such changes or any law proposed to replace the ACA would take, and how or whether it may affect our business in the future. We expect that changes to the ACA, the Medicare and Medicaid programs, changes allowing the federal government to directly negotiate drug prices and changes stemming from other healthcare reform measures, especially with regard to healthcare access, financing or other legislation in individual states, could have a material adverse effect on the healthcare industry and on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and/or our stock price operations.
Sales of our totalproducts may continue to be adversely affected by the continuing consolidation of our distribution network and the concentration of our customer base.
Our principal customers are wholesale drug distributors, major retail drug store chains and mail order pharmacies. These customers comprise a significant part of the distribution network for pharmaceutical products in the U.S. This distribution network has undergone significant consolidation marked by mergers and acquisitions among wholesale distributors and the growth of large retail drug store chains. As a result, a small number of large wholesale distributors control a significant share of the market and the number of independent drug stores and small drug store chains has decreased. We expect that consolidation of drug wholesalers and retailers will increase pricing and other competitive pressures on drug manufacturers, including Lannett.
Our net sales consistsmay also be affected by fluctuations in the buying patterns of distributed products manufactured by JSP. Two of these products are Levothyroxine Sodiumretail chains, mail order distributors, wholesalers and Digoxin, whichother trade buyers, whether resulting from pricing, wholesaler buying decisions or other factors.
Our three largest customers accounted for 36%27%, 21% and 1%, respectively, of our Fiscal 2018 total net sales and 27% and 2%12%, respectively, of our total net sales for Fiscal 2017. On August 19, 2013,2021 and 25%, 23% and 11%, respectively, of our total net sales for Fiscal 2020. The loss of any of these customers, any financial difficulties experienced by any of these customers or any delay in receiving payments from such customers could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition and our cash flows. In addition, the Company enteredgenerally does not enter into an agreementlong-term supply agreements with JSPits customers that would require them to extend its initial contractpurchase our products.
25
We expend a significant amount of resources on research and development efforts that may not lead to continuesuccessful product introductions.
We conduct R&D primarily to enable us to gain approval for, manufacture, and market pharmaceuticals in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. We also partner with third parties to develop products. We cannot be certain that any investment made in developing products will be recovered, even if we are successful in commercialization. To the extent that we expend significant resources on R&D efforts and are not able, ultimately, to introduce successful new and/or complex products as the exclusive distributor in the United Statesa result of three JSP products: Butalbital, Aspirin, Caffeine with Codeine Phosphate Capsules USP; Digoxin Tablets USP; and Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets USP. The amendment to the original agreement extended the initial contract, which was due to expire on March 22, 2014, for five years through March 23, 2019, at which time the distribution agreement will expire and not be renewed. If the supply of these products is interrupted in any way by any form of temporary or permanent business interruption to JSP, including but not limited to fire or other naturally-occurring, damaging event to their physical plant and/or equipment, condemnation of their facility, legislative or regulatory cease and desist declaration regarding their operations, FDA action or any interruption in their source of API for their products, our operating resultsthose efforts, there could be materially adversely affected. We do not have, at this time, a second source for these products.
Management’s plans to address the impactmaterial adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of the nonrenewal of the JSP Distribution Agreement may not be successful.
Management is continuing to finalize plans to offset the impact of the nonrenewal of the JSP Distribution Agreement. These plans currently include, among other things, an emphasis on reducing cost of sales, R&D and SG&A expenses, continuing to accelerate new product launches, increasing its level of strategic partnerships and reducing capital expenditures. Management will also continue its emphasis on accelerating ANDA filings. However, the impact that these actions will have cannot be assured and they may not be sufficient to offset the impact, in whole or in part, of the loss of net sales, earnings oroperations, cash flows, resulting fromand/or the nonrenewalprice of the JSP Distribution Agreement.our common stock.
Risks Related to our Indebtedness
Our substantial indebtedness may adversely affect our financial health.
We currently have substantial indebtedness. As of June 30, 2018,2021, we had total indebtedness of $897.3$635.6 million, which primarily consistsincluding $350.0 million of an amended term loan facility7.75% senior secured notes (the “Amended Term“Notes”), the $190.0 million Second Lien Secured Loan Facility (the “Second Lien Facility”) and $86.3 million aggregate principal amount of 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Convertible Notes”). We also have an undrawn $125.0availability of $45.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolvingunder the Amended ABL Credit Facility”). The Amended Term Loan Facility consists of an initial $910.0 million senior secured term loan facility (the “Senior Secured Term Loan Facility”), which was amended in June 2016 to include an additional $150.0 million incremental term loan (the “Incremental Term Loan”). The Amended Term Loan Facility, together with the Revolving Credit Facility comprises the amended senior secured credit facility (the “Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility”).
Facility.
Our substantial indebtedness may have important consequences for us. For example, it may:
·may make it more difficult for us to make payments on our indebtedness; increase our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions, including recessions and periods of significant inflation and financial market volatility;
·expose us to the risk of increased interest rates because any borrowings we make under the RevolvingAmended ABL Credit Facility and other borrowings under the Term Loan Facility under certain circumstances, will bear interest at variable rates;
·require us to use a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to service our indebtedness, thereby reducing our ability to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other expenses;
·limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
· increase our cost of future borrowing; place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that have less indebtedness; and
·limit our ability to borrow additional funds that may be needed to operate and expand our business.
The Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility imposes operatingagreements and financialinstruments governing our debt, contain restrictions which may prevent us from pursuing certain business opportunities and taking certain actionslimitations that may be potentially profitable or incould significantly impact our best interests.
ability to operate our business.
The operating and financial restrictions and covenants in the agreements and instruments that govern our Amended Senior Secured Credit Facilityindebtedness restrict, and future debt instruments may restrict, subject to certain important exceptions and qualifications, our and our subsidiaries’ ability to, among other things:
·things, incur or guarantee additional indebtedness;
·make certain investments or acquisitions;
·grant or permit certain liens on our assets;
·enter into certain transactions with affiliates;
·pay dividends redeem our equityon or make other restricted payments;
·distributions in respect of our capital stock; make investments or acquisitions; prepay, repurchase or redeem contractually subordinated debt and certain other debt;
·indebtedness; sell or otherwise transfer assets, including capital stock of our subsidiaries; merge, consolidate or transfer all or substantially all of our assets;
·transfer, sell enter into transactions with our affiliates; grant or disposepermit dividend or other payment restrictions affecting certain of propertyour subsidiaries; and assets; and
·change the business we conduct or enter into new kindslines of business.
In addition, the Amended ABL Credit Facility includes a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.10 to 1.00, which is tested only when excess availability is less than 15.0% of the lesser of (A) the borrowing base and (B) the then effective commitments under the Amended ABL Credit Facility for three consecutive business days, and continuing until the first day immediately succeeding the last day of 30 consecutive days on which Excess Availability is in excess of such threshold, and the Second Lien Credit Facility requires us to maintain at least $5.0 million in a deposit account subject at all times to control by the collateral agent for the Second Lien Lenders, and minimum liquidity of $15 million as of the last day of each month. These covenants could adversely affect our ability to finance our future operations or capital needs, withstand a future downturn in our business or the economy in general, engage in business activities, including future opportunities that may be in our interest, and plan for or react to market conditions or otherwise execute our business strategies. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control. See Note 22. “Subsequent Events” for more information related to the JSP Distribution Agreement. A breach of any of these covenants could result in a default in respect of the related indebtedness. If an event ofa default occurs, the relevant lenders or holders of such indebtedness could elect to declare the indebtedness, together with accrued interest fees and other liabilities,fees, to be immediately due and payable and proceed against any collateral securing that indebtedness. Acceleration of our other indebtedness could result in a default under the terms of the agreements that govern the Amended ABL Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility or the indentures governing the 4.50% Convertible Senior Secured Credit Facility.Notes and the Senior Notes. There is no guarantee that we would be able to satisfy our obligations if any of our indebtedness is accelerated.
26
In addition, the limitations that are imposed in the agreements that govern the Amended Senior SecuredABL Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility on our ability to incur certain additional debt and to take other corporate actions might significantly impair our ability to obtain other financing. If, for any reason, we are unable to comply with the restrictions in the agreements that govern the Amended Senior SecuredABL Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility, we may not be granted waivers or amendments to such restrictions or we may not be able to refinance our debt on terms acceptable to us, or at all. The lenders under the Amended Senior SecuredABL Credit Facility also have the right in these circumstances to terminate any commitments they have to provide further borrowings. If we fail to meet any covenants in our Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility and cannot secure a waiver for such failure, the lenders under our Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility would be entitled to exercise various rights, including causing the amounts outstanding under the entire Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility to become immediately due and payable. If we were unable to pay such amounts, the lenders under the Amended Senior SecuredABL Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility could recover amounts owed to them by foreclosing against the collateral pledged to them. We have pledged a substantial portion of our assets to the lenders under the Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility, including the equity of our subsidiaries.
Our Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility contains a financial covenant and other restrictive covenants that limit our flexibility. We may not be able to comply with these covenants, which could result in the amounts outstanding under our Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility becoming immediately due and payable.
Our Revolving Credit Facility requires us to comply with a first lien net leverage ratio not to exceed 3.75:1.00 when there are outstanding loans and letters of credit (other than (i) drawn letters of credit that have been cash collateralized and (ii) up to $5.0 million of undrawn letters of credit) thereunder that exceed 30% of the aggregate commitment amount under the Revolving Credit Facility of $125.0 million as of the last day of the applicable fiscal quarter (with a step-down occurring as of December 31, 2019 of 3.25:1.00).
In addition, the Term Loan A Facility is subject to a financial performance covenant, which provides that the Company shall not permit its secured net leverage ratio as of the last day of any four consecutive fiscal quarters to be greater than 3.75:1.00 (with a step-down occurring as of December 31, 2019 to 3.25:1.00). Accordingly, if our liquidity and performance significantly worsens, we could become non-compliant with such covenants. See Note 22. “Subsequent Events” for more information related to the JSP Distribution Agreement, which will not be renewed.
As of June 30, 2018, the Company was in compliance with the financial and other covenants included in its debt agreements. See Note. 10 “Long-Term Debt”. Based on its current projections, the Company expects to have sufficient liquidity and cash flows to be able to meet its debt service requirements through June 30, 2019 and expects to be in compliance with its financial covenants throughout Fiscal 2019. If actual results for the year ending June 30, 2019 are less than the Company’s current projections and/or if management’s plans to offset the loss of the revenues and cash flows from the products distributed under the JSP Distribution Agreement are not successful, the Company could be in violation of its covenants, which may require significant accelerated payments of debt.
We are also subject to requirements to make mandatory prepayments, with the net proceeds of certain asset sales, excess cash flows and debt issuances. These requirements could limit our ability to obtain future financing, make acquisitions or needed capital expenditures, withstand any downturns in our business or the economy in general, conduct operations or otherwise take advantage of business opportunities that may arise, any of which could place us at a competitive disadvantage relative to our competitors that have less debt and are not subject to such restrictions.
Our variable rate indebtedness subjects us to interest rate risk, which could cause our debt service obligations to increase significantly.
Borrowings under the Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility are at variable rates of interest and expose us to interest rate risk. Interest rates are currently at historically low levels. If interest rates increase, our debt service obligations on our variable rate indebtedness will increase even though the amount borrowed remained the same and our net income and cash flows, including cash available for servicing our indebtedness, will correspondingly decrease. Based on total indebtedness as of June 30, 2018 and the assumption that interest rates are above the interest rate floor set forth in the Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility, each 1/8th percentage point change in interest rates would result in a $1.1 million change in annual interest expense on our indebtedness under the Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility.
Due to many factors beyond our control, we may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our indebtedness and meet our other ongoing liquidity needs and we may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under our debt agreements, which may not be successful.
Our ability to make payments on, and to refinance, our indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Our business may not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and we may not have available to us future borrowings in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our other liquidity needs. In these circumstances, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. Any refinancing of our debt could be at higher interest rates and may require us to comply with more onerous covenants, which could further restrict our business operations. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness or obtain additional financing will depend on, among other things:
·things our financial condition at the time;
·restriction restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness;
·indebtedness, and the condition of the financial markets and the industry in which we operate; and
·our debt credit ratings
operate.
As a result, we may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all. In such a case, we could be forced to sell assets, reduce or delay capital expenditures or issue equity securities to make up for any shortfall in our payment obligations under unfavorable circumstances. The terms of the indentures that govern the 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes and the Senior Notes and the agreements that govern the Amended Senior SecuredABL Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility limit our ability to sell assets. In addition, we may not be able to sell assets quickly enough or for sufficient amounts to enable us to meet our obligations. Any failure to make scheduled payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness when due would permit the holders of such indebtedness to declare an event of default and accelerate the indebtedness, which in turn could lead to cross defaults under the instruments governing our other indebtedness. This could result in the lenders under the agreement that governs the Amended Senior SecuredABL Credit Facility terminating their commitments to lend us money and could result in the lenders under the agreement that governs the Amended ABL Credit Facility and the Second Lien Credit Facility foreclosing against the assets securing the borrowingssuch facilities, and we could be forced into bankruptcy or other insolvency proceedings. In addition, any failure to make payments of interest and principal on our outstanding indebtedness on a timely basis would likely result in a reduction of our credit rating, which could harm our ability to incur additional indebtedness on acceptable terms. In August 2018, both Moody’s
Risks Related to our Financial Condition and S&P reducedResults
Our gross profit may fluctuate from period to period depending upon our product sales mix, our product pricing and our costs to manufacture or purchase products.
Our future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows depend to a significant extent upon our product sales mix. Sales of certain products that we manufacture tend to create higher gross margins than the Company’s debt credit ratingproducts we purchase and resell. As a result, our sales mix will significantly impact our gross profit from period to “B3”period.
Factors that may cause our sales mix to vary include the number of new product introductions; marketing exclusivity, if any, which may be obtained on certain new products; the level of competition in the marketplace for certain products; the availability of raw materials and “B-”finished products from our suppliers; and the scope and outcome of governmental regulatory action that may involve us.
The Company is continuously seeking to keep product costs low, however there can be no guarantee that gross profit percentages will stay consistent in future periods. Pricing pressure from competitors, changes in product mix and the costs of producing or purchasing new drugs may also fluctuate in future periods.
27
A relatively small group of products may represent a significant portion of our revenues, gross profit, or net earnings from time to time.
Sales of a limited number of our products from time to time represent a significant portion of our revenues, gross profit and net earnings. For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2021, 2020 and 2019, our top five products in terms of sales, in the aggregate, represented approximately 36%, 45% and 52%, respectively, of our total net sales. If the volume or pricing of our largest selling products decline in the future (including with respect to Fluphenazine and they indicated that they were goingPosaconazole, two products for which net sales decreased during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 due to perform additional reviews.lower sales prices driven by new competitors entering the market), our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and/or share price could be materially adversely affected. See Note 22. “Subsequent Events”“Description of Business” below for more information related to the JSP Distribution Agreement, which will not be renewed.on our top products.
If our goodwill or other intangible assets become impaired, we may be required to record a significant charge to earnings.
Under accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“U.S. GAAP”),GAAP, we review our goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually and when there are changesif a triggering event occurs, which would indicate a potential change in circumstances.market conditions or future outlook of value. We may be required to record additional significant charges to earnings in our financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or indefinite lived intangible assets is determined, resulting in a negative effect on our results of operations. Changes in market conditions or other changes in the future outlook of value may lead to further impairments in the future. In addition, we continue to review the potential divestment of certain assets as part of our future plans, which may lead to additional impairments. Future events or decisions may lead to asset impairments and/or related charges. For assets that are not impaired, we may adjust the remaining useful lives. Certain non-cash impairments may result from a change in our strategic goals, business direction or other factors relating to the overall business environment. Any significant impairment could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
We may incur additional tax liabilities related to our operations.
As described above,We are subject to income tax in the United States. We record liabilities for uncertain tax positions that involve significant management judgment as to the application of law. Our effective tax rate may also be adversely affected by numerous other factors, including changes in tax laws and regulations, and tax effects of the accounting for stock-based compensation (which depend in part on August 20, 2018, the Company announced thatprice of our stock and, therefore, are beyond our control). Due to the JSP Distribution Agreementresults of the recent U.S. Presidential and Congressional elections, the potential for U.S. tax law changes exists, including as a result of proposals to increase the income tax rate. Increases to the income tax rate or other changes to the tax law could materially impact our tax provision, cash tax liability, and effective tax rate. The pressure to generate tax revenue to offset economic relief measures due to the COVID-19 pandemic could increase the likelihood of adverse tax law changes being enacted. If changes in U.S. federal and applicable state income tax laws increase our U.S. federal or state income tax liability, we will be obligated to pay such increased U.S. federal and state income tax liability which expireswould reduce our cash available for business operations. Changes to or the imposition of new U.S. federal, state, or local taxes could have a material adverse effect on March 23, 2019 will notour liquidity and financial condition.
Our tax returns and positions are subject to review and audit by the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities, and any adverse outcomes resulting from any examination of our tax returns could adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition.
The positions taken in our U.S. federal, state and local income tax return filings require significant judgments and the interpretation and application of complex tax laws. Our income tax returns are subject to examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. While we believe our tax return positions are proper and supportable, certain positions could be renewed.successfully challenged. An unfavorable outcome of any current or future tax audit could result in our need to utilize available cash to satisfy such tax liabilities and any interest or penalties thereon rather than for our business operations. As a result, the Company has determined that such nonrenewal representsoccurrence of an unfavorable outcome with respect to any future tax audit could have a “triggering event” under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”)material adverse effect on our liquidity and accordingly, will perform an analysis to determine the potential for any impairmentfinancial condition.
28
Legal and certain long-lived assets of the CompanyRegulatory Risks
Governmental investigations into sales and marketing practices in the first quarter of Fiscal 2019. In management’s opinion, the impairment assessment will likely result in a material impairment of goodwillgeneric pharmaceutical industry and claims by private parties relating to such investigations may result in an impairment of certain long-lived assets; however, at this time the Company cannot estimate the amountsubstantial penalties or range of amounts of such impairment. As of June 30, 2018, the carrying value of goodwill was $339.6 million. Any impairment would result in a noncash charge to earnings in the first quarter of Fiscal 2019. See Note 22. “Subsequent Events” for more information related to potential impairment in Fiscal 2019 related to the JSP Distribution Agreement not being renewed.
Our gross profit may fluctuate from period to period depending upon our product sales mix, our product pricing and our costs to manufacture or purchase products.
Our future results of operations, financial condition and cash flows depend to a significant extent upon our product sales mix. Sales of certain products that we manufacture tend to create higher gross margins than the products we purchase and resell. As a result, our sales mix will significantly impact our gross profit from period to period.
Factors that may cause our sales mix to vary include:
·the number of new product introductions;
·marketing exclusivity, if any, which may be obtained on certain new products;
·the level of competition in the marketplace for certain products;
·the availability of raw materials and finished products from our suppliers; and
·the scope and outcome of governmental regulatory action that may involve us.
The Company is continuously seeking to keep product costs low, however there can be no guarantee that gross profit percentages will stay consistent in future periods. Pricing pressure from competitors, changes in product mix and the costs of producing or purchasing new drugs may also fluctuate in future periods.
Acquisitions could result in operating difficulties, dilution and other harmful consequences that may adversely impact our business and results of operations.
Acquisitions are an important element of our overall corporate strategy and use of capital. These transactions could be material to our financial condition and results of operations. We also expect to continue to evaluate and enter into discussions regarding a wide array of potential strategic transactions. We may compete for certain acquisition targets with companies having greater financial resources than us or other advantages over us that may hinder or prevent us from acquiring a target company or completing another transaction, which could also result in significant diversion of management time, as well as substantial out-of-pocket costs. The process of integrating an acquired company, business, or technology may create unforeseen operating difficulties and expenditures. The areas where we may face risks include but are not limited to (i) diversion of management time and focus from operating our business to acquisition integration challenges, (ii) implementation or remediation of controls, procedures and policies at the acquired company, (iii) integration of the acquired company’s accounting, human resource and other administrative systems and coordination of product, engineering and sales and marketing functions, (iv) transition of operations, users and customers onto our existing platforms, (v) failure to obtain required approvals from governmental authorities under competition and antitrust laws on a timely basis, if at all, which could, among other things, delay or prevent us from completing a transaction, or otherwise restrict our ability to realize the expected financial or strategic goals of an acquisition, (vi) cultural challenges associated with integrating employees from the acquired company into our organization and retention of employees from the businesses we acquire and (vii) liability for activities of the acquired company before the acquisition, including infringement claims, violations of laws, commercial disputes, tax liabilities, claims from current and former employees and customers and other known and unknown liabilities.
Our failure to address these risks or other problems encountered in connection with our past or future acquisitions could cause us to fail to realize the anticipated benefits of such acquisitions, incur unanticipated liabilities and harm our business generally. Future acquisitions could also result in dilutive issuances of our equity securities, the incurrence of debt, contingent liabilities, or amortization expenses, or write-offs of goodwill, any of which could harm our financial condition. Also, the anticipated benefit of many of our acquisitions may not materialize.
We have been and may continue to be adversely affected by increased governmental rebates and regulations with respect to matters relating to the pricing of our products and we may experience pricing pressure or reduce pricing flexibility on the price of certain of our products due to competitive or governmental pressure to lower the cost of drugs, which could reduce our revenue and future profitability.
settlements.
There has been increased press coverage and increased scrutiny from regulatory and enforcement agencies and legislative bodies with respect to matters relating to the pricing of generic pharmaceuticals, including publicity and pressure resulting from prices charged by our competitors. We have experienced and may continue to experience downward pricing pressure on the price of our products due to competitive pressure to lower the cost of drugs to the ultimate consumer, which could reduce our revenue and future profitability. This increased press coverage and public scrutiny have resulted in, and may continue to result in, investigations, and calls for investigations, by governmental agencies at both the federal and state level and have resulted in, and may continue to result in, claims brought against us by private parties or by regulators taking other measures that could have a negative effect on our business. For a description of current, and federal, and state investigations and claims by private parties, see Note 1110 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and Contingencies”.Contingencies.” Additional actions are possible. Responding to such investigations and claims is costly and involves a significant diversion of management attention. Such proceedings are unpredictable and may develop over lengthy periods of time. Future settlements may involve large monetary penalties. It is not possible at this time to predict the ultimate outcome of any such investigations or claims or what other investigations or lawsuits or regulatory responses may result from such assertions, or their impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and/or ordinary shareour stock price. Any such investigation or claim could also result in reputational harm and reduced market acceptance and demand for our products, could harm our ability to market our products in the future, could cause us to incur significant expense, could cause our senior management to be distracted from execution of our business strategy, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects. Accompanying the press and media coverage of pharmaceutical pricing practices and public complaints about the same, there has been increasing U.S. federal and state legislative and enforcement interest with respect to drug pricing. In recent years, both the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate have conducted numerous hearings with respect to pharmaceutical drug pricing practices, including in connection with the investigation of specific price increases by pharmaceutical companies.companies, designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient support programs, reduce the costs of drugs under Medicare and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for drug products. Any proposed measures will require authorization through additional legislation to become effective, and it is uncertain whether Congress or the Biden administration will seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs. The Biden administration has indicated that lowering drug prices continues to be a legislative and political priority. Further, it is possible that additional governmental action is taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition to the effects of any investigations or claims brought against us described above, our revenue and future profitability could also be negatively affected if any such inquiries, of us or of other pharmaceutical companies or the industry more generally, were to result in legislative or regulatory proposals that limit our ability to increase the prices of our products. Any of the events or developments described above could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations, as well as on our reputation.
The recent enactment of State laws affecting the pricing of our products could have the effect of reducing our profitability.
TheSince 2016, several state legislatures have enacted laws regulating the pricing of various types of pharmaceutical products, including generic pharmaceutical industryproducts. These laws vary in applicability and scope, and generally require manufacturers to notify various state agencies of price increases over a given threshold for a given period of time and to include a justification for any price increases. At least one state law (subsequently struck down by the court) authorized the state attorney general to seek civil penalties and disgorgement in the event a price increase is highly competitive.
We face strong competition indeemed unconscionable. To the extent these laws apply to our generic product business. Revenues and gross profit derived fromproducts, they could limit the sales of generic pharmaceutical products tend to follow a pattern based on certain regulatory and competitive factors. Typically, as patentsprices which the company may charge for brand-nameits products and related exclusivity periods expire or fall under patent challenges,reduce the first generic manufacturer to receive regulatory approval for generic equivalentscompany’s profitability and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of such products is generally able to achieve significant market penetration. As competing off-patent manufacturers receive regulatory approvals on similar products or as brand manufacturers launch generic versionsoperations and growth prospects.
29
Extensive industry regulation has had and will continue to have, a significant impact on our business in the area of cost of goods, especially our product development, manufacturing and distribution capabilities.
All pharmaceutical companies, including Lannett, are subject to extensive, complex, costly and evolving regulation by the federal government, including the FDA and, in the case of controlled drugs, the DEA and state government agencies. The FDCA,Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”), the CSAControlled Substance Act (the “CSA”) and other federal statutes, regulations and guidance govern or influence the development, testing, manufacturing, packing, labeling, storing, record keeping, safety, approval, advertising, promotion, sale and distribution of our products.
The process for obtaining governmental approval to manufacture and market pharmaceutical products is rigorous, time-consuming and costly and we cannot predict the extent to which we may be affected by legislative and regulatory developments. We are dependent on receiving FDA and other governmental or third-party approvals prior to manufacturing, marketing and shipping our products. The FDA approval process for a particular product candidate can take several years and requires us to dedicate substantial resources to complete all activities necessary to secure approvals and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates in a timely manner, or at all. In order to obtain approval of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (“ANDAs”) for our generic product candidates, we must demonstrate that our drug product is therapeutically equivalent and bioequivalent to a drug previously approved by the FDA through the drug approval process, known as the reference listed drug (“RLD”) or reference standard drug (“RS”). Bioequivalence may be demonstrated in vivo or in vitro by comparing the generic product candidate to the innovator drug product. During theApproval of our drug products that vary in certain ways from a brand name version of that drug may require a different FDA review process and application known as a 505(b)(2) NDA. Such 5050(b)(2) applications may require costly human clinical studies which may extend the time for approval of such drug product. Moreover, the FDA may request additional information and studies to support approval of an application, which could delay approval of the product and impair our ability to compete with other versions of the generic drug product.
Consequently, there is always the chance that we will not obtain FDA or other necessary approvals, or that the rate, timing and cost of such approvals will adversely affect our product introduction plans or results of operations. We carry inventories of certain products in anticipation of launch and if such products are not subsequently launched, we may be required to write-off the related inventory. Furthermore, the FDA also has the authority to withdraw drug approvals previously granted after a hearing and require a firm to remove these products from the market for a variety of reasons, including a failure to comply with applicable regulations or the discovery of previously unknown safety problems with the product.
Additionally, certain products marketed priorWe cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action. For example, the new presidential administration, sworn in January 2021, may impact our business and industry. The policies and priorities of the new administration are unknown and could materially impact the regulations governing our product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the FDCAadoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may be considered GRASE or Grandfathered. GRASE products are those “old drugs that do not require prior approval from FDA in ordersubject to enforcement action and there could be marketed because they are generally recognized as safe and effective baseda material adverse effect on published scientific literature.” Similarly, Grandfathered products are those which “entered the market before the passageour business, financial condition, results of the 1906 Act, 1938 Act operations, cash flows, and/or the 1962 amendments to the Act.” Under the Grandfathered drug clause, such a product is exempted from the “effectiveness requirements [of the act] if its composition and labeling have not changed since 1962 and if, on the day before the 1962 amendments became effective, it was (1) used or sold commercially in the United States, (2) not a new drug as defined by the act at that time and (3) not covered by an effective application.” Recently, the FDA has increased its efforts to force companies to file and seek FDA approval for Grandfathered products. Efforts have included issuing notices to companies currently producing these products to cease its distributionprice of said products. Lannett currently manufactures and markets Grandfathered products, including cocaine hydrochloride oral solution and hyosyne solution/elixir.
our common stock.
In addition, facilities used to manufacture and/or test materials and drug products we market are subject to periodic inspection of facilities by the FDA, the DEA and other authorities to confirm that firms are in compliance with all applicable regulations. The FDA conducts pre-approval and/or post-approval inspections to determine whether systems and processes are in compliance with cGMP and other FDA regulations. A Form 483 notice is generally issued at the conclusion of a FDA inspection and lists conditions the FDA inspectors believe may violate cGMP or other FDA regulations. If more serious violations are identified, the FDA may take additional action, such as issuing warning letters, import alerts, etc. The DEA and comparable state-level agencies also heavily regulate the manufacturing, holding, processing, security, record-keeping and distribution of drugs that are controlled substances. Lannett manufactures and/or distributes a variety of controlled substances. The DEA periodically inspects facilities for compliance with its regulations. If our manufacturing facilities or those of our suppliers fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, it could result in regulatory action and additional costs. All of our facilities as well as applicable contract/supplier facilities, rely on maintaining current FDA registration and other licenses to produce and develop generic drugs. If the Company does not successfully renew its FDA registrations, the financial results of Lannett would be negatively impacted. We and our third-party manufacturers are subject to periodic inspection by the FDA to assure regulatory compliance regarding the manufacturing, distribution, and promotion of pharmaceutical products. The FDA imposes stringent mandatory requirements on the manufacture and distribution of pharmaceutical products to ensure
30
their safety and efficacy. If we or our partners receive similar notices of manufacturing and quality-related observations and correspondence in the future, and if we are unable to resolve these observations and address the FDA’s concerns in a timely fashion, our business, financial results and/or stock price could be materially affected.
Our inability or the inability of our suppliers to comply with applicable FDA and other regulatory requirements can result in, among other things, delays in or denials of new product approvals, warning letters, import alerts, fines, consent decrees restricting or suspending manufacturing operations, injunctions, civil penalties, recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of sales and/or criminal prosecution. Any of these or other regulatory actions could materially harm our operating results and financial condition. Although we have instituted internal compliance programs, if these programs do not meet regulatory agency standards or if compliance is deemed deficient in any significant way, it could materially harm our business.business. Additionally, if the FDA were to undertake additional enforcement activities with Lannett’s Grandfathered products, their actions could result in, among other things, removal of some products from the market, seizure of the product and total or partial suspension of sales. Any of these regulatory actions could materially harm our operating results and financial condition.
Our manufacturing operations as well as our suppliers’ manufacturing operations are subject to establishment registration by the FDA and/or DEA. If we or our suppliers are do not maintain the current registrations, our operating results would be materially negatively impacted.
All of our facilities as well as applicable contract/supplier facilities, rely on maintaining current FDA registration and other licenses to produce and develop generic drugs. Specifically, our Cody Labs operations rely on a DEA license to directly import and convert raw concentrated poppy straw into several APIs or dosage forms. This license is granted for a one-year period and must be renewed successfully each year in order for us to maintain Cody Lab’s current operations and allow the Company to continue to work towards becoming a fully integrated organization. If the Company does not successfully renew its FDA registrations and/or DEA licenses, the financial results of Lannett would be negatively impacted.
If we are unable to successfully develop or commercialize new products, our operating results will suffer.
Our future results of operations will depend to a significant extent upon our ability to successfully commercialize new generic products in a timely manner. There are numerous difficulties in developing and commercializing new products, including:
·developing, testing and manufacturing products in compliance with regulatory standards in a timely manner;
·receiving requisite regulatory approvals for such products in a timely manner;
·the availability, on commercially reasonable terms, of raw materials, including APIs and other key ingredients;
·developing and commercializing a new product is time consuming, costly and subject to numerous factors that may delay or prevent the successful commercialization of new products; and
·commercializing generic products may be substantially delayed by unexpired patents covering the brand drug.
As a result of these and other difficulties, products currently in development by Lannett may or may not receive the regulatory approvals necessary for marketing. If any of our products, when developed and approved, cannot be successfully or timely commercialized, our operating results could be adversely affected. We cannot guarantee that any investment we make in developing products will be recouped, even if we are successful in commercializing those products.
The loss of key personnel could cause our business to suffer.
The success of our present and future operations will depend, to a significant extent, upon the experience, abilities and continued services of our key personnel. If we lose the services of our key personnel, or if they are unable to devote sufficient attention to our operations for any other reason, our business may be significantly impaired. If the employment of any of our current key personnel is terminated, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and replace the employee with the same caliber of key personnel. As such, we have entered into employment agreements with all of our senior executive officers in order to help retain these key individuals.
If brand pharmaceutical companies are successful in limiting the use of generics through their legislative and regulatory efforts, our sales of generic products may suffer.
Many brand pharmaceutical companies have increasingly used state and federal legislative and regulatory means to delay generic competition. These efforts have included:
·included pursuing new patents for existing products which may be granted just before the expiration of one patent, which could extend patent protection for additional years or otherwise delay the launch of generics;
·using the Citizen Petition process to request amendments to FDA standards;
·seeking changes to U.S. Pharmacopeia, an organization which publishes industry recognized compendia of drug standards;
·attaching patent extension amendments to non-related federal legislation;
·engaging in state-by-state initiatives to enact legislation that restricts the substitution of some generic drugs, which could have an impact on products that we are developing;
·persuading regulatory bodies to withdraw the approval of brand-name drugs for which the patents are about to expire and converting the market to another product of the brand company on which longer patent protection exists;
· limiting the availability of certain RLDs, with Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (“REMS”) distribution requirements, to generic companies for bioequivalence testing required for ANDA premarket approval for commercialization; entering into agreements whereby other generic companies will begin to market an AG, a generic equivalent of a branded product, at the same time or after generic competition initially enters the market;
·filing suits for patent infringement and other claims that may delay or prevent regulatory approval, manufacture and/or scale of generic products; and,
·introducing “next-generation” products prior to the expiration of market exclusivity for the reference product, which often materially reduces the demand for the generic or the reference product for which we seek regulatory approval.
In the U.S., some pharmaceutical companies have lobbied Congress for amendments to the Hatch-Waxman Act that would give them additional advantages over generic competitors. For example, although the term of a company’s drug patent can be extended to reflect a portion of the time an NDA is under regulatory review, some companies have proposed extending the patent term by a full year for each year spent in clinical trials rather than the one-half year that is currently permitted.
If proposals like these were to become effective, or if any other actions by our competitors and other third parties to prevent or delay activities necessary to the approval, manufacture, or distribution of our products are successful, our entry into the market and our ability to generate revenues associated with new products may be delayed, reduced, or eliminated, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and/or share price.
31
The generic pharmaceutical industry is characterized by intellectual property litigation and third parties may claim that we infringe on their proprietary rights, which could result in litigation that could be costly, result in the diversion of management’s time and efforts, require us to pay damages or prevent us from marketing our existing or future products.
Our commercial success will depend in part on not infringing or violating the intellectual property rights of others. The manufacture, use and sale of new products that are the subject of conflicting patent rights have been the subject of substantial litigation in the pharmaceutical industry. These lawsuits relate to the validity and infringement of patents or proprietary rights of third parties. We may have to defend against charges that we violated patents or proprietary rights of third parties. This is especially true in the case of generic products on which the patent covering the brand product is expiring, an area where infringement litigation is prevalent and in the case of new brand products in which a competitor has obtained patents for similar products. Our competitors, some of which have substantially greater resources than we do and have made substantial intellectual property investments in competing technologies, may have applied for or obtained, or may in the future apply for and obtain, patent rights and other intellectual property that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use and sell our products. We may not be aware of whether our products do or will infringe existing or future patents or the intellectual property rights of others. In addition, patent applications can be pending for many years and may be confidential for a number of months after filing and because pending patent claims can be revised before issuance, there may be applications of others now pending of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patents that will prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with our ability to make, use or sell our products. Even if we prevail, litigation may be costly and time-consuming and could divert the attention of our management and technical personnel. Any potential intellectual property litigation also could force us to do one or more of the following:
·stop making, selling or using products or technologies that allegedly infringe the asserted intellectual property;
·lose the opportunity to license our technology to others or to collect royalty payments based upon successful protection and assertion of our intellectual property rights against others;
·incur significant legal expenses;
·pay substantial damages or royalties to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be found to be infringing;
·pay the attorney fees and costs of litigation to the party whose intellectual property rights we may be found to be infringing;
·redesign or rename, in the case of trademark claims, those products that contain the allegedly infringing intellectual property, which could be costly, disruptive and/or infeasible; or
·attempt to obtain a license to the relevant intellectual property from third parties, which may not be available on reasonable terms or at all.
Any litigation or claim against us, even those without merit, may cause us to incur substantial costs and could place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management from our core business and harm our reputation. For a description of intellectual property-related litigation matters, see Note 11 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and Contingencies.” If we are found to infringe the intellectual property rights of third parties, we could be required to pay substantial damages and/or substantial royalties and could be prevented from selling our products unless we obtain a license or are able to redesign our products to avoid infringement. If we fail to obtain any required licenses or make any necessary changes to our products or technologies, we may have to withdraw existing products from the market or may be unable to commercialize one or more of our products, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Although the parties to patent and intellectual property disputes in the pharmaceutical industry have often settled their disputes through licensing or similar arrangements, the costs associated with these arrangements may be substantial and could include ongoing royalties. Any such license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all and there can be no assurance that we would be able to redesign our products in a way that would not infringe the intellectual property rights of others. Even if we were able to obtain rights to the third-party’s intellectual property, these rights may be non-exclusive, thereby giving our competitors access to the same intellectual property. As a result, an adverse determination in a judicial or administrative proceeding or failure to obtain necessary licenses could prevent us from manufacturing and selling a number of our products, or force us to redesign or rename our products to avoid infringing the intellectual property rights of third parties, which, even if it is possible to so redesign or rename our products, which could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
32
If weTable of Contents
Our reporting and payment obligations related to our participation in U.S. federal healthcare programs, including Medicare, Medicaid and the Department of Veterans Affairs, are unable to obtain sufficient supplies from key supplierscomplex and often involve subjective decisions that in some cases may be the only source of finished products or raw materials, our ability to deliver our products to the market may be impeded.
We are required to identify the supplier(s) of all the raw materials for our products in our applications with the FDA. To the extent practicable, we attempt to identify more than one supplier in each drug application. However, some products and raw materials are available only from a single source and, in some of our drug applications, only one supplier of products and raw materials has been identified, even in instances where multiple sources exist. To the extent any difficulties experienced by our suppliers cannot be resolved within a reasonable time and at reasonable cost, or if raw materials for a particular product become unavailable from an approved supplier and we are required to qualify a new supplier with the FDA, our profit margins and market share for the affected product could decrease and our development and sales and marketing efforts could be delayed.
Our policies regarding returns, allowances and chargebacks and marketing programs adopted by wholesalers may reduce our revenues in future fiscal periods.
Based on industry practice, generic drug manufacturers have liberal return policies and have been willing to give customers post-sale inventory allowances. Under these arrangements, from time to time we give our customers credits on our generic products that our customers hold in inventory after we have decreased the market prices of the same generic products due to competitive pricing. Therefore, if new competitors enter the marketplace and significantly lower the prices of any of their competing products, we would likely reduce the price of our products. Aschange as a result we would likely be obligatedof new business circumstances, new regulations or agency guidance, or advice of legal counsel. Any failure to provide creditscomply with those obligations could subject us to our customers who are then holding inventories of such products, which could reduce sales revenueinvestigation, penalties, and gross margin for the period the credit is provided. Like our competitors, we also give credits for chargebackssanctions.
U.S. federal laws regarding reporting and payment obligations with respect to wholesalers that have contracts with us for their sales to hospitals, group purchasing organizations, pharmacies or other customers.
A chargeback is the difference between the price the wholesaler paysa pharmaceutical company’s participation in federal healthcare programs, including Medicare, Medicaid and the price that the wholesaler’s end-customer paysDepartment of Veterans Affairs (“VA”), are complex. Because our processes for a product. Although we establish reserves based on our prior experience and our best estimates of the impact that these policies may have in subsequent periods, we cannot ensure that our reserves are adequate or that actual product returns, allowances and chargebacks will not exceed our estimates.
Health care initiatives and other third-party payor cost-containment pressures have and could continue to cause us to sell our products at lowercalculating applicable government prices resulting in decreased revenues.
Some of our products are purchased or reimbursed by state and federal government authorities, private health insurers and other organizations, such as health maintenance organizations, or HMOs and managed care organizations, or MCOs. Third-party payors increasingly challenge pharmaceutical product pricing. There also continues to be a trend toward managed health care in the United States. Pricing pressures by third-party payors and the growthjudgments involved in making these calculations involve subjective decisions and complex methodologies, these calculations are subject to risk of organizationserrors and differing interpretations. In addition, they are subject to review and challenge by the applicable governmental agencies, and it is possible that such as HMOs and MCOsreviews could result in lower prices and a reduction in demand for our products.changes that may have material adverse legal, regulatory, or economic consequences.
In addition, legislative and regulatory proposals and enactments to reform health care and government insurance programs could significantly influence the manner in which pharmaceutical products and medical devices are prescribed and purchased. We expect there will continue to be federal and state laws and/Any governmental agencies or regulations, proposed and implemented,authorities that could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for health care products and services. The extent to which future legislationhave commenced, or regulations, if any,may commence, an investigation of us relating to the health care industrysales, marketing, pricing, quality, or third-party coveragemanufacturing of pharmaceutical products could seek to impose, based on a claim of violation of anti-fraud and reimbursementfalse claims laws or otherwise, civil and/or criminal sanctions, including fines, penalties, and possible exclusion from federal healthcare programs, including Medicare, Medicaid and/or the VA. Some of the applicable laws may impose liability even in the absence of specific intent to defraud. Furthermore, should there be enactedambiguity with regard to how to properly calculate and report payments—and even in the absence of any such ambiguity—a governmental authority may take a position contrary to a position we have taken, and may impose or what effect such legislation pursue civil and/or regulation wouldcriminal sanctions. Governmental agencies may also make changes in program interpretations, requirements or conditions of participation, some of which may have onimplications for amounts previously estimated or paid. There can be no assurance that our business remains uncertain. For example,submissions will not be found by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services or the American Recovery and Reinstatement Act of 2009, also known as the Stimulus Package, includes $1.1 billion in funding to study the comparative effectiveness of health care treatments and strategies. The Stimulus Package funding is expectedVA to be used for, among other things,incomplete or incorrect. Any failure to conduct, supportcomply with the above laws and regulations, and any such penalties or synthesize research that compares and evaluates the risk and benefits, clinical outcomes, effectiveness and appropriateness of products. Although Congress has indicated that this funding is intended for improvement in quality of health care, it remains unclear how the research will impact coverage, reimbursement or other third-party payor policies. Such measures or other health care system reforms that are adoptedsanctions could have a material adverse effect on our industry generally and our ability to successfully commercialize our products business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and/or could limit or eliminate our spending on development projects and affect our ultimate profitability.stock price.
We may need to change our business practices to comply with changes to fraud and abuse laws.
We are subject to various federal and state laws pertaining to health care fraud and abuse, including the federal Medicare and Medicaid Anti-Kickback Statute (the “Anti-Kickback Statute”“AKS”), which apply to our sales and marketing practices and our relationships with physicians and other referral sources. At the federal level, the Anti-Kickback StatuteThe AKS prohibits any person or entity from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering, or paying any remuneration, including a bribe, kickback, or rebate, directly or indirectly, in return for or to induce the referral of patients for items or services covered by federal health care programs, or the furnishing, recommending, or arranging for products or services covered by federal health care programs. Federal health caresuch programs have been defined to(which include plans and programs that provide health benefits funded by the federal government, including Medicare and Medicaid, among others. The definition of “remuneration”others). “Remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value, including, for example, gifts, discounts, the furnishing of supplies or equipment, credit arrangements, payments of cash and waivers of payments. Several courts have interpreted the federal Anti-Kickback Statute’sAKS’s intent requirement to mean that if even one purpose in an arrangement involving remuneration is to induce referrals or otherwise generate business involving goods or services reimbursed in whole or in part under federal health care programs, the statute has been violated.violated, and in 2020, the Eleventh Circuit ruled that no proof of a payee’s motivation for accepting a payment is required. The federal government has issued “safe harbor” regulations commonly known as safe harbors that set forth certain provisions which, if fully met, will assure parties that they will not be prosecutedsanctioned under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.AKS. The failure of a transaction or arrangement to fit within a specific safe harbor does not necessarily mean that the transaction or arrangement will be illegal or that prosecution under the federal Anti-Kickback StatuteAKS will be pursued, but such transactions or arrangements face an increased risk of scrutiny by government enforcement authorities and an ongoing risk of prosecution. If our sales and marketing practices or our relationships with physicians are considered by federal or state enforcement authorities to be knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering, or providing any remuneration in exchange for arranging for or recommending our products and services and such activities do not fit within a safe harbor, then these arrangements could be challenged under the federal Anti-Kickback Statute.
AKS.
If our operations are found to be in violation of the federal Anti-Kickback StatuteAKS we may be subject to civil and criminal penalties including fines of up to $25 thousand$100,000 per violation, civil monetary penalties of up to $50 thousand$100,000 per violation, assessments of up to three times the amount of the prohibited remuneration, imprisonment and exclusion from participating in the federal health care programs. Violations of the Anti-Kickback StatuteAKS also may result in a finding of civil liability under the FFCAFederal False Claims Act (“FFCA”) (as further discussed below) and the potential imposition of additional civil fines and monetary penalties that
33
could be substantial. Falsely certifying compliance with the AKS in connection with a claim submitted to a federally funded insurance program is actionable under the FFCA. In addition, HIPAAThe Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) and its implementing regulations created two new federal crimes: health care fraud and false statements relating to health care matters. The HIPAA health care fraud statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to execute, a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program, including private payors. A violation of this statue is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment and/or exclusion from government-sponsored programs. The HIPAA false statements statute prohibits, among other things, knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or representation in connection with the delivery of or payment for health care benefits, items, or services.
A number of states also have anti-fraud and anti-kickback laws similar to the federal Anti-Kickback StatuteAKS that prohibit certain direct or indirect payments if such arrangements are designed to induce or encourage the referral of patients or the furnishing of goods or services. Some states’ anti-fraud and anti-kickback laws apply only to goods and services covered by Medicaid.Medicaid or programs such as workers’ compensation. Other states’ anti-fraud and anti-kickback laws apply to all health care goods and services, regardless of whether the source of payment is governmental or private. Due to the breadth of these laws and the potential for changes in laws, regulations, or administrative or judicial interpretations, we may have to change our business practices or our existing business practices could be challenged as unlawful, which could materially adversely affect our business.
Certain federal and state governmental agencies, including the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, have been investigating issues surrounding pricing information reported by drug manufacturers and used in the calculation of reimbursements as well as sales and marketing practices. For example, many government and third-party payors, historically including Medicare and Medicaid, reimburse doctors and others for the purchase of certain pharmaceutical products based on the product’s AWPaverage wholesale price (“AWP”) reported by pharmaceutical companies, although the Company has not used the term AWP since 2000. Medicare currently uses average sales price (“ASP”) and wholesale acquisition cost (“WAC”) when ASP data is unavailable. The federal government, certain state agencies and private payors are investigating and have begun to file court actions related to pharmaceutical companies’ reporting practices with respect to AWP, alleging that the practice of reporting prices for pharmaceutical products has resulted in a false and overstated AWP, which in turn is alleged to have improperly inflated the reimbursement paid by Medicare beneficiaries, insurers, state Medicaid programs, medical plans and others to health care providers who prescribed and administered those products. In addition, some of these same payors are also alleging that companies are not reporting their “best price” to the states under the Medicaid program.
Furthermore, under the FDCA, it is illegal for pharmaceutical companies to promote their products for uses that are not approved by the FDA, and companies that market drugs for so-called “off-label” indications may be subject to civil liability under the FFCA (as further discussed below), as well as to criminal penalties. Over the past decade, numerous lawsuits have been filed against pharmaceutical companies challenging their off-label promotional activities, and pharmaceutical companies, in the aggregate, have paid billions of dollars to defend and settle these cases.
We may become subject to federal and state false claims litigation brought by private individuals and the government.
We are subject to state and federal laws that govern the submission of claims for reimbursement. The FFCA imposes civil liability on individuals or entities that knowingly submit, or cause to be submitted, false or fraudulent claims for payment to the government. Violations of the FFCA and other similar laws may result in criminal fines, imprisonment and substantial civil penalties for each false claim submitted (including civil penalties presently in excess of $21,000$23,607 per claim, plus treble damages, plus liability for attorney’s fees) and exclusion from federally funded health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid. The FFCA also allows private individuals to bring a suit on behalf of the government against an individual or entity for violations of the FFCA. These suits, also known as Qui Tam or whistleblower actions, may be brought by, with only a few exceptions, any private citizen who has material information of a false claim that has not yet been previously disclosed. These suits have increased significantly in recent years because the FFCA allows an individual to share in the amounts paid to the federal government in fines or settlement as a result of a successful Qui Tam action, in addition to the recovery of legal fees in bringing such an action. If our past or present operations are found to be in violation of any of such laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to penalties, including civil and criminal penalties, damages, fines, exclusion from federal health care programs and/or the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. Any penalties, damages, fines, curtailment, or restructuring of our operations could adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our financial results, actionresults. Action against us for
34
violation of these laws, even if we successfully defend against them, could cause us to incur significant legal expenses and divert our management’s attention from the operation of our business.
Federal regulation of arrangements between manufacturers of brand and generic products could adversely affect our business.
Sales of our products may continue to be adversely affected by the continuing consolidation of our distribution network and the concentration of our customer base.
Our principal customers are wholesale drug distributors, major retail drug store chains and mail-order pharmacies. These customers comprise a significantAs part of the distribution network for pharmaceutical products inMedicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, companies are now required to file with the U.S. This distribution network is continuing to undergo significant consolidation marked by mergers and acquisitions among wholesale distributorsFederal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the growthDepartment of large retailJustice certain types of agreements entered into between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies related to the manufacture, marketing and sale of generic versions of brand drugs. This new requirement could affect the manner in which generic drug store chains. As amanufacturers resolve intellectual property litigation and other disputes with brand pharmaceutical companies and could result a small numbergenerally in an increase in private-party litigation against pharmaceutical companies or additional investigations or proceedings by the FTC or other governmental authorities. The impact of large wholesale distributors control a significant sharethis new requirement and the potential private-party lawsuits associated with arrangements between brand-name and generic drug manufacturers is uncertain and could adversely affect our business.
Investigations of the marketcalculation of average wholesale prices may adversely affect our business.
Many government and third-party payers, including Medicare, Medicaid, Health Maintenance Organization and Managed Care Organization, have historically reimbursed doctors, pharmacies and others for the numberpurchase of independent drug storescertain prescription drugs based on a drug’s AWP or WAC. In the past several years, state and small drug store chainsfederal government agencies have conducted ongoing investigations of manufacturers’ reporting practices with respect to AWP and WAC, in which they have suggested that reporting of inflated AWP’s or WAC’s has decreased. We expect that consolidationled to excessive payments for prescription drugs. For a description of drug wholesalerscurrent and retailers will increase pricingfederal and other competitive pressures on drug manufacturers, including Lannett.
Our three largest customers accounted for 29%, 17%state investigations and 6%, respectively, of our total net sales for Fiscal 2018claims by private parties, see Note 10 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and 28%, 21% and 6%, respectively, of our total net sales for Fiscal 2017. The loss of any of these customersContingencies.” Additional actions are possible. These actions, if successful, could materially adversely affect us and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, and financial condition and our cash flows.
We may incur product liability losses or recall expenses relating to the sale of products containing nitrosamines.
According to FDA guidance, nitrosamine impurities, including, among others, N-nitrosodimethylamine (“NDMA”) may increase the risk of cancer if people are exposed to them above acceptable levels and over long periods of time, but a person taking a drug that contains nitrosamines at-or-below the acceptable daily intake limits every day for 70 years is not expected to have an increased risk of cancer. FDA published a guidance entitled “Control of Nitrosamine Impurities in Human Drugs” that recommends steps manufacturers of APIs and drug products should take to detect and prevent unacceptable levels of nitrosamine impurities in pharmaceutical products. Lannett initiated an internal risk assessment and control strategy for nitrosamines prior to issuance of the guidance. In addition,some cases where its marketed products contain nitrosamines above published FDA acceptable levels (such as ranitidine), Lannett may be required to recall affected product, such as Lannett’s ranitidine product, which was subject to an industry wide recall when NDMA was discovered as a byproduct of the manufacturing process. Subsequent to the recall of its ranitidine product, Lannett was named a defendant in a series of product liability lawsuits. Product liability claims and lawsuits, safety alerts, product recalls or corrective actions, regardless of their ultimate outcome, could have a material adverse effect on our business and reputation and on our ability to attract and retain customers. We are unable to predict at this time if any other Lannett products will be adversely impacted by the global pharmaceutical nitrosamine review.
As part of our risk management policy, we carry third-party product liability insurance coverage; however, the insurance industry recently adopted an exclusion into its comprehensive general liability policies for nitrosamine impurities. To the extent that any of Lannett’s products are subject to recall as a result of nitrosamine impurities and/or are subject to lawsuit arising out of the presence of nitrosamine impurities in its products, such losses may not be covered by insurance and could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and financial condition.
35
Increasing scrutiny and evolving expectations from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders with respect to our environmental, social and governance practices may impose additional costs on us or expose us to new or additional risks.
Companies are facing increasing scrutiny from customers, regulators, investors, and other stakeholders related to their environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) practices and disclosure. Investor advocacy groups, investment funds and influential investors are also increasingly focused on these practices, especially as they relate to the environment, climate change, health and safety, supply chain management, diversity, labor conditions and human rights, both in our own operations and in our supply chain. Increased ESG-related compliance costs for the Company generally does not enter into long-termas well as among our suppliers, vendors and various other parties within our supply agreementschain could result in material increases to our overall operational costs. Failure to adapt to or comply with its customers that would require themregulatory requirements or investor or stakeholder expectations and standards could negatively impact our reputation, ability to purchasedo business with certain partners, access to capital, and our products.stock price.
General Business Risks
A relatively small groupPublic health threats, including a pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease in the United States or elsewhere may adversely affect our business and financial results.
Our business may be adversely affected by public health threats, including any pandemic, epidemic or outbreak of an infectious disease occurring in the United States or worldwide. The COVID-19 virus has spread to over 200 countries since December 2019 and continues to impact the global economy. The virus may impact our business, operations and financial results.
Any business shutdowns or other business interruptions affecting our suppliers or interruptions in global shipping affecting our suppliers could result in our inability to continue receiving sufficient amount of finished dosage products, may represent a significant portionAPI and other raw materials. Any business shutdowns or other business interruptions affecting our business development and other strategic partners could also cause delays in the regulatory approval process for and launching of some or all of our revenues, gross profit,pipeline drug candidates. We cannot presently predict the duration and severity of any potential business shutdowns or net earningsdisruptions, but if we or any of the third parties with whom we engage, including the partners and other third parties with whom we conduct business, were to experience shutdowns or other business disruptions, our ability to conduct our business in the manner and on the timelines presently planned could be materially and adversely impacted. Additionally, subsequent to an initial stocking up of supplies at the start of the pandemic, the total volume of drug prescriptions written during the pandemic has decreased, causing less demand for our products. The length and severity of the pandemic may continue to affect the demand for our products in the future.
We have taken temporary precautionary measures intended to help minimize the risk of the virus to our employees, including temporarily requiring all employees, other than employees in our manufacturing plants, distribution centers, and R&D facilities, who are able to work from timehome to time.
Saleswork remotely. We have suspended non-essential travel worldwide for our employees and are discouraging employee attendance at other gatherings. These measures could negatively affect our business. For instance, temporarily requiring many of our employees to work remotely may disrupt our operations or increase the risk of a limited numbercybersecurity incident.
Although the Company has taken many safety measures to reduce the impact of COVID-19 on our employees, we have experienced an increase in absenteeism arising from intermittent spikes in cases across the country, which has caused an increase in overtime and cost to produce the products. The Company has also experienced an increase in employee turnover, due to, in part, the COVID-19 pandemic and competing demands for manufacturing skills. To date, the rate of employee absenteeism and employee turnover has not had any material effect on the Company’s business or its ability to manufacture and distribute products from timeand plants continue to time represent a significant portionoperate at normal capacity. The ongoing risk of employee absenteeism and employee turnover could materially impact the Company’s operations.
The full extent to which COVID-19 has impacted and may continue to impact our revenues, gross profitbusiness will depend on future developments, which are still uncertain and net earnings. Forcannot be predicted with confidence, such as the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018, 2017duration of the outbreak, or the effectiveness of actions to contain and 2016, our top five products in terms of sales,treat COVID-19, particularly in the aggregate, represented approximately 58%, 53%geographies where we or our third-party suppliers or business development and 57%, respectively,other strategic partners operate. Given the speed and frequency of continuously evolving developments with respect to this pandemic, we cannot reasonably estimate the magnitude of any impact on our total net sales. Ifoperations and the volume or pricing of our largest selling products decline in the future,full extent to which COVID-19 may impact our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and/liquidity or share pricefinancial position is uncertain.
36
The loss of key personnel could be materially adversely affected. See Item 1. Description of Business for more information oncause our top products. On August 20, 2018, the Company announced that the JSP Distribution Agreement which expires on March 23, 2019 will not be renewed. Accordingly, future top product concentration rates will decline. Net sales of JSP products, primarily Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets USP, which is onebusiness to suffer.
The success of our top five products, totaled $253.1 million, $187.0 millionpresent and $190.4 million in fiscal year 2018, 2017future operations will depend, to a significant extent, upon the experience, abilities and 2016, respectively or 37%, 30% and 35%, respectively,continued services of our net sales.key personnel. If we lose the services of our key personnel, or if they are unable to devote sufficient attention to our operations for any other reason, our business may be significantly impaired. If the employment of any of our current key personnel is terminated, we cannot assure you that we will be able to attract and replace the employee with the same caliber of key personnel. As such, we have entered into employment agreements with all of our senior executive officers in order to help retain these key individuals.
We are increasingly dependent on information technology and our systems and infrastructure face certain risks, including cybersecurity and data leakage risks.
Significant disruptions to our information technology systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our business. We are increasingly dependent on information technology systems and infrastructure to operate our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information (including trade secrets or other intellectual property, proprietary business information and personal information) and it is critical that we do so in a secure manner to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. We could be susceptible to third-party attacks on our information technology systems, which attacks are of ever increasingever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise, including state and quasi-state actors, criminal groups, “hackers” and others. Maintaining the security, confidentiality and integrity of this confidential information (including trade secrets or other intellectual property, proprietary, business information and personal information) is important to our competitive business position. ThereThe Company maintains cyber security insurance and, as part of the renewal process, the carrier undertakes an assessment of the security system controls. Additionally, information security falls within the scope of the annual audit performed by our independent audit firm. The Audit Committee has oversight responsibilities over cybersecurity and meets at least quarterly with the Company’s IT management and an outside cybersecurity consulting firm, which performs an annual assessment of our cybersecurity controls. The Audit Committee also communicates with the Company’s independent audit firm frequently regarding their annual audit procedures. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that we can prevent service interruptions or security breaches in our systems or the unauthorized or inadvertent wrongful use or disclosure of confidential information that could adversely affect our business operations or result in the loss, misappropriation and/or unauthorized access, use or disclosure of, or the prevention of access to, confidential information. A breach of our security measures or the accidental loss, inadvertent disclosure, unapproved dissemination, misappropriation or misuse of trade secrets, proprietary information, or other confidential information, whether as a result of theft, hacking, fraud, trickery or other forms of deception, or for any other cause, could enable others to produce competing products, use our proprietary technology or information and/or adversely affect our business position. Further, any such interruption, security breach, or loss, misappropriation and/or unauthorized access, use or disclosure of confidential information could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The design, development, manufacture and sale of our products involvesRising insurance costs, as well as the risk of product liability claimsinability to obtain certain insurance coverage for risks faced by consumers and other third parties and insurance against such potential claims is expensive and may be difficult to obtain.
us, could negatively impact profitability.
The design, development, manufacture and sale of our products involve an inherent risk of product liability claims and the associated adverse publicity. Insurance coverage is expensive and may be difficult to obtain and may not be available in the future on acceptable terms, or at all. Although we currently maintain product liability insurance for our products in amounts we believe to be commercially reasonable, if the coverage limits of these insurance policies are not adequate, a claim brought against Lannett, whether covered by insurance or not, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Rising insurance costs, as well as the inability to obtain certain insurance coverage for risks faced by us, could negatively impact profitability.
The cost of insurance, including product liability as well as workers compensation product liability and general liability insurance, has risen in recent years and may increase in the future. In response, we may increase deductibles and/or decrease certain coverage to mitigate these costs. These increases and our increased risk due to increased deductibles and reduced coverage, could have a negative impact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Additionally, certain insurance coverage may not be available to us for risks faced by us. Sometimes the coverage we obtain for certain risks may not be adequate to fully reimburse the amount of damage that we could possibly sustain. Should either of these events occur, the lack of insurance to cover our entire cost would adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
37
Federal regulationTable of arrangements between manufacturers of brand and generic products could adversely affect our business.Contents
As part of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement and Modernization Act of 2003, companies are now required to file with the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice certain types of agreements entered into between brand and generic pharmaceutical companies related to the manufacture, marketing and sale of generic versions of brand drugs. This new requirement could affect the manner in which generic drug manufacturers resolve intellectual property litigation and other disputes with brand pharmaceutical companies and could result generally in an increase in private-party litigation against pharmaceutical companies or additional investigations or proceedings by the FTC or other governmental authorities. The impact of this new requirement and the potential private-party lawsuits associated with arrangements between brand-name and generic drug manufacturers is uncertain and could adversely affect our business.
We expend a significant amount of resources on research and development efforts that may not lead to successful product introductions.
We conduct R&D primarily to enable us to gain approval for, manufacture, and market pharmaceuticals in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. We also partner with third parties to develop products. We cannot be certain that any investment made in developing products will be recovered, even if we are successful in commercialization. To the extent that we expend significant resources on R&D efforts and are not able, ultimately, to introduce successful new and/or complex products as a result of those efforts, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and/or the price of our common stock.
Investigations of the calculation of average wholesale prices may adversely affect our business.
Many government and third-party payers, including Medicare, Medicaid, Health Maintenance Organization and Managed Care Organization, have historically reimbursed doctors, pharmacies and others for the purchase of certain prescription drugs based on a drug’s AWP or wholesale acquisition cost (“WAC”). In the past several years, state and federal government agencies have conducted ongoing investigations of manufacturers’ reporting practices with respect to AWP and WAC, in which they have suggested that reporting of inflated AWP’s or WAC’s has led to excessive payments for prescription drugs. For a description of current and federal and state investigations and claims by private parties, see Note 11 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and Contingencies.” Additional actions are possible. These actions, if successful, could adversely affect us and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
The market price of our common stock has been volatile and may continue to be volatile in the future, and the value of any investment in our common stock could decline significantly.
The market price for our shares of common stock listed on the NYSE has fluctuated significantly from time to time, for example, varying between an intra-day high of $30.35 to an intra-day low of $12.70 during Fiscal 2018. As described above, on August 20, 2018, the Company announced that the JSP Distribution Agreement which expires on March 23, 2019 will not be renewed. As a result, our closing stock price significantly declined to $5.35 on August 20, 2018. The market price of our common stock is likely to continue to be volatile and subject to significant price and volume fluctuations in response to market, industry and other factors, including the risks described in this section. Further, the stock market for pharmaceutical companies has recently experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. In particular, recent negative publicity regarding pricing and price increases by pharmaceutical companies has negatively impacted, and may continue to negatively impact, the market for pharmaceutical companies. These broad market and industry factors have negatively impacted, and in the future may seriously negatively impact, the market price of our common stock, regardless of our operating performance. Our stock market price may also be dependent upon the valuations and recommendations of the analysts who cover our business. If our results do not meet these analysts’ forecasts, the expectations of our investors or the financial guidance we provide to investors in any period, the market price of our common stock could decline. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market or significant price decline, securities class-action litigation has often been instituted against companies and we have been subject to one such suit, as further described in Note 11 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and Contingencies”. Such suits could result in substantial costs and diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
The recent enactment of State laws affecting the pricing of our products could have the effect of reducing our profitability.
Between 2016 and 2018, several state legislatures have enacted laws regulating the pricing of various types of pharmaceutical products, including generic pharmaceutical products. These laws vary in applicability and scope, and generally require manufacturers to notify various state agencies of price increases over a given threshold for a given period of time and to include a justification for any price increases. At least one state law (subsequently struck by the court) authorized the state attorney general to seek civil penalties and disgorgement in the event a price increase is deemed unconscionable. To the extent these laws apply to our products, they could limit the prices which the company may to be to charge for its products and reduce the company’s profitability and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Other manufacturers and distributors of pain management products have had complaints filed against and investigations commenced them, and if similar actions are taken against us it could reduce our revenue and future profitability.
During the past few years, a number of complaints have been filed with respect to sales and distribution of various types of pain management medications against various pharmaceutical companies (not including Lannett), by a number of cities, counties and states across the country alleging among other things that such companies failed to develop and implement systems sufficient to identify suspicious orders of such products and prevent the diversion of such products to individuals who used them for other than legitimate medical purposes. The complaints generally contend that the defendants allegedly engaged in improper marketing of pain management products, and seek a variety of remedies, including restitution, civil penalties, disgorgement of profits, treble damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief. In addition, a number of State Attorneys General, including a coordinated multistate effort, have initiated investigations into sales and marketing practices of various pharmaceutical companies (not including Lannett) with respect to such pain management products. If any similar investigations or claims are commenced against us, it could result in reputational harm and reduced market acceptance and demand for our products, could harm our ability to market our products in the future, could cause us to incur significant expense, could cause our senior management to be distracted from execution of our business strategy, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Guidelines and recommendations published by various organizations can reduce the use of our pain management products.
Government agencies promulgate regulations and guidelines directly applicable to us and to our products. In addition, professional societies, practice management groups, private health and science foundations and organizations from time to time may also publish guidelines or recommendations to the healthcare and patient communities. Recommendations of government agencies or these other groups or organizations may relate to such matters as usage, dosage, route of administration and use of concomitant therapies. For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has issued guidelines about the use of pain management products for chronic pain, the FDA has issued an Opioid Action Plan and in 2017 President Trump signed an executive order establishing the President’s Commission on Combatting Drug Addiction. Additionally, the FDA has required all opioid products, including immediate release drugs, to join a shared REMS program that educates healthcare providers to reduce serious adverse outcomes resulting from inappropriate prescribing, misuse, and abuse of opioid analgesics while maintaining patient access to pain medications. REMS participation has added significant costs to the company. Recommendations or guidelines suggesting the reduced use of our products or the use of competitive or alternative products as the standard of care to be followed by patients and healthcare providers could result in decreased use of our products and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and growth prospects.
Risks Related to our Acquisition (the “Acquisition”) of Kremers Urban Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
We have not yet realized all the anticipated synergies, cost savings and growth opportunities from the Acquisition.
The benefits that we expect to achieve as a result of the Acquisition will depend, in part, on the ability of the combined company to realize anticipated growth opportunities and cost synergies. Our success in realizing these growth opportunities and cost synergies and the timing of this realization, depends on the successful integration of the historical Lannett business and operations and the historical KUPI business and operations. Even if we are able to integrate the Lannett and KUPI businesses and operations successfully, this integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of the growth opportunities and cost synergies that we currently expect from this integration within the anticipated time frame or at all. Moreover, we may incur substantial expenses in connection with this integration. While we anticipate that certain expenses will be incurred, such expenses are difficult to estimate accurately and may exceed current estimates. Accordingly, the benefits from the Acquisition may be offset by costs or delays incurred in integrating the businesses.
The Company is in the process of seeking restoration by the FDA of an AB rating for its methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release product. Such restoration could take significant time, if it occurs at all, and failure to timely reestablish an AB rating may adversely affect our financial results.
During a teleconference in November 2014, the FDA informed KUPI that it had concerns about whether generic versions of Concerta (methylphenidate hydrochloride extended release tablets), including KUPI’s Methylphenidate ER product, are therapeutically equivalent to Concerta. The FDA indicated that its concerns were based in part on adverse event reports concerning lack of effect and its analyses of pharmacokinetic data. The FDA informed KUPI that it was changing the therapeutic equivalence rating of its product from “AB” (therapeutically equivalent) to “BX.” A BX-rated drug is a product for which data are insufficient to determine therapeutic equivalence; it is still approved and can be prescribed, but the FDA does not recommend it as automatically substitutable for the brand-name drug at the pharmacy.
During the November 2014 teleconference, the FDA also asked KUPI to either voluntarily withdraw its product or to conduct new bioequivalence (“BE”) testing in accordance with the recommendations for demonstrating bioequivalence to Concerta proposed in a new draft BE guidance that the FDA issued earlier that November. The FDA had approved the KUPI product (and originally granted it an AB rating) in 2013, on the basis of KUPI data showing its product met BE criteria set forth in draft BE guidance that the FDA had issued in 2012. The FDA’s position concerning the KUPI product was the subject of a public announcement by the agency. The Company agreed to conduct new BE studies per the new draft BE guidance. KUPI submitted the data from those studies to the FDA in June 2015 and met with the FDA to discuss the results in July 2015.
On October 18, 2016, the Company received notice from the FDA that it will seek to withdraw approval of the Company’s ANDA for Methylphenidate ER. The FDA’s notice includes an opportunity for the Company to request a hearing on this matter. Following the Company’s request under the FOIA for documents to support its request for a hearing, the FDA granted an extension to submit all data, information and analyses upon which the request for a hearing relies.
In response to the Company’s FOIA requests, the FDA provided four sets of documents between April 4, 2017 and October 25, 2017 and, on December 4, 2017, the Company submitted extensive information, data, analyses, and expert reports to the FDA that demonstrate the existence of genuine and substantial issues of fact that necessitate a hearing to prove the therapeutic equivalence of its product. On December 8, 2017, the documents were posted on the public docket. The FDA has not yet made a decision as to whether to grant a hearing to the Company.
The Company intends to continue working with the FDA to regain the “AB” rating, and in the meantime, maintain the drug on the U.S. market with a BX rating. However, there can be no assurance as to when or if the Company will regain the “AB” rating or be permitted to remain on the market. If the Company were to receive the “AB” rating, net sales of the product could increase subject to market factors existing at that time. The Company also agreed to potential acquisition-related contingent payments to UCB related to Methylphenidate ER if the FDA reinstates the AB-rating and certain sales thresholds are met. Such potential contingent payments are set to expire after December 31, 2020.
KUPI has received notification regarding state inquiries into its pricing practices.
In August 2015, KUPI received a letter from the Texas Office of the Attorney General alleging that KUPI had inaccurately reported certain price information in violation of the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act. The Company is currently cooperating with the Texas Attorney General’s Office, however, the outcome of the investigation could result in serious fines being levied on us, along with harm to our reputation. Any negative outcome from this or any other investigation related to our pricing could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
ITEM 2.DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Lannett owns several facilities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Certain administrative functions, manufacturing and research and development facilities are located in a 31,000 square foot facility at 9000 State Road, Philadelphia, PA. A second, 63,000 square foot facility is located within one mile of the State Road facility at 9001 Torresdale Avenue, Philadelphia, PA and contains our analytical research and development and quality control laboratories. The facility has capacity for additional manufacturing, packaging or laboratory space, if needed. We also own a building at 13200 Townsend Road in Philadelphia, PA consisting of 66,000 square feet on 7.3 acres of land which is currently used for warehouse space and shipping. In June 2018, the Company initiated a process to begin consolidating all shipping and receiving activities to its Seymour, Indiana facility. The consolidation of shipping and receiving will allow us to vacate the 13200 Townsend Road facility in the future.
As of June 30, 2018, Lannett also owned two separate properties at 11501 Roosevelt Boulevard and 11601 Roosevelt Boulevard, which were purchased in December 2013 for $4.0 million and $5.0 million respectively. On July 13, 2018, the Company completed the sale of both properties for total consideration of $14.6 million before fees and selling costs.
The manufacturing facility of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cody Labs, consists of a 73,000 square foot structure located on approximately 15.0 acres in Cody, Wyoming. The Cody Labs’ manufacturing facility specializes in API and controlled substance production and currently has capacity for further expansion, both inside and outside the existing structure. In June 2018, the Company announced the Cody Restructuring Plan, as further described in Note 3. “Restructuring Charges”.
In connection with the acquisition of Silarx, the Company acquired an 110,000 square foot manufacturing facility located in Carmel, New York, which sits on 25.8 acres of land. The facility specializes in liquid products and currently houses manufacturing, packaging, quality and research and development and has capacity for additional manufacturing space, if needed.
KUPI’sCompany’s 432,000 square foot Seymour, Indiana facility contains approximately 107,000 square feet of manufacturing space as well as a leased 116,000 square foot temperature/humidity-controlled storage warehouse. The Seymour facility has had satisfactory inspections conducted by the FDA and EMA and similar regulatory authorities of Japan, Taiwan, Brazil, China, Korea and Turkey. Since 2008, KUPI has made significant improvements to its facility and equipment. These improvements enabledAs of June 30, 2021, the facility to increasehas a production fromcapacity of approximately 1.24.0 billion doses in 2008 to over 2.7 billion doses in 2014. Prior to the acquisition, KUPI also completed a 20,000based on our current product mix and plant configuration.
The Company has an 110,000 square foot expansionmanufacturing facility located in Carmel, New York, which sits on 25.8 acres of land. The facility specializes in liquid products and currently houses manufacturing, packaging, quality and research and development and has capacity for additional manufacturing space, if needed.
Lannett owns two facilities in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The research and development facilities are located in a 31,000 square foot facility at 9000 State Road and a second, 63,000 square foot facility that is located within one mile of the State Road facility which increased capacityat 9001 Torresdale Avenue, Philadelphia, PA. The latter facility contains our analytical research and development and quality control laboratories. We have adopted many systems and processes to 3.9 billion doses.ensure adherence to FDA requirements and we believe we are operating our facilities in substantial compliance with the FDA’s cGMP regulations.
Information pertaining to legal proceedings can be found in Note 1110 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and Contingencies” under Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedule and is incorporated by reference herein.
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable
38
PART II
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market Information
The Company’s common stock trades on the NYSE. The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the intraday high and intraday low sales prices per share of the Company’s common stock during Fiscal 20182021 and 2017,2020, as quoted by the NYSE.
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 20182021
| | | | | | |
|
| High |
| Low | ||
| | | | | | |
First quarter | | $ | 7.55 | | $ | 4.89 |
| | | | | | |
Second quarter | | $ | 7.18 | | $ | 5.75 |
| | | | | | |
Third quarter | | $ | 10.70 | | $ | 5.23 |
| | | | | | |
Fourth quarter | | $ | 5.82 | | $ | 4.12 |
|
| High |
| Low |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First quarter |
| $ | 23.75 |
| $ | 14.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Second quarter |
| $ | 30.35 |
| $ | 18.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Third quarter |
| $ | 25.40 |
| $ | 14.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fourth quarter |
| $ | 17.58 |
| $ | 12.70 |
|
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 20172020
| | | | | | |
|
| High |
| Low | ||
| | | | | | |
First quarter |
| $ | 15.52 | | $ | 5.46 |
| |
| | | | |
Second quarter | | $ | 13.12 | | $ | 8.16 |
| | | | | | |
Third quarter | | $ | 10.34 | | $ | 5.91 |
| | | | | | |
Fourth quarter | | $ | 10.01 | | $ | 6.10 |
|
| High |
| Low |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
First quarter |
| $ | 39.99 |
| $ | 23.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Second quarter |
| $ | 28.21 |
| $ | 16.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Third quarter |
| $ | 23.95 |
| $ | 18.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Fourth quarter |
| $ | 27.90 |
| $ | 17.80 |
|
Holders
As of June 30, 2018,2021, there were 1,0301,056 holders of record of the Company’s common stock.
Dividends
The Company did not pay cash dividends in Fiscal 20182021, Fiscal 2020 or Fiscal 2017.2019. The Company intends to use available funds for working capital, to pay down outstanding debt, plant and equipment additions, various product extension ventures and merger and acquisition or other growth opportunities. In addition, the Company is subject to certain restrictions on dividends under its Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility. The Company does not expect to pay, nor should stockholders expect to receive, cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
39
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to the Company’s share repurchase activity.activity in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2021.
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Period |
| (a) Total |
| (b) Average |
| (c) Total |
| (d) Maximum |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
April 1 to April 30, 2018 |
| 162 |
| $ | 15.80 |
| — |
| $ | — |
|
May 1 to May 31, 2018 |
| 619 |
| 15.94 |
| — |
| — |
| ||
June 1 to June 30, 2018 |
| 4,505 |
| 13.59 |
| — |
| — |
| ||
Total |
| 5,286 |
| 13.93 |
| — |
| — |
| ||
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | (d) Maximum | |
| | | | | | | (c) Total | | Number (or | |
| | | | | | | Number of | | Approximate | |
| | | | | | | Shares (or | | Dollar Value) | |
| | | | | | | Units) | | of Shares (or | |
| | | | | | | Purchased as | | Units) that | |
| | (a) Total | | | | | Part of | | May Yet Be | |
| | Number of | | (b) Average | | Publicly | | Purchased | ||
| | Shares (or | | Price Paid | | Announced | | Under the | ||
Period | | Units) | | per Share (or | | Plans or | | Plans or | ||
(In thousands) |
| Purchased* |
| Unit) |
| Programs |
| Programs | ||
| | | | | | | | | | |
April 1 to April 30, 2021 |
| 1,094 | | $ | 4.37 |
| — | | $ | — |
May 1 to May 31, 2021 |
| 2,468 | |
| 4.43 |
| — | |
| — |
June 1 to June 30, 2021 |
| 293 | |
| 4.60 |
| — | |
| — |
Total |
| 3,855 | | $ | 4.43 |
| — | |
| — |
*Shares were repurchased to settle employee tax withholding obligations pursuant to equity award programs.
40
Stock Performance Chart
The following graph presents a comparison of thecompares Lannett Company’s annual percentage change in cumulative total stockholder return on common shares over the Company’s stockpast five years, commencing July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2021, with the cumulative total return of various indexes forcompanies comprising the periodNYSE Composite Index and the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index. The S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index is an industry index published by S&P Dow Jones Indices, a division of five fiscal years commencing July 1, 2013S&P Global, and ending June 30, 2018. The graphis comprised stocks in the S&P Total Market Index that are classified in the GICS pharmaceuticals sub-industry. This presentation assumes that $100 was invested on July 1, 2013 in eachshares of the various indexes.
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
relevant issuers on June 30, 2016, and that dividends received were immediately invested in additional shares. The following financial information asgraph plots the value of andthe initial $100 investment at one-year intervals for the fivefiscal years endedshown. The S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index replaces the Morningstar Drug Manufacturers -Specialty & Generic Index in this analysis and going forward, as the latter data is no longer accessible. The latter index has been included with data through June 30, 2018, has been derived from our consolidated financial statements. This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere herein.2020.
Lannett Company, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Financial Highlights
(In thousands, except per share data) |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
| 2015 |
| 2014 |
| |||||
Operating Highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Net sales |
| $ | 684,563 |
| $ | 637,341 |
| $ | 566,091 |
| $ | 406,837 |
| $ | 273,771 |
|
Settlement agreement |
| $ | — |
| $ | (4,000 | ) | $ | (23,598 | ) | $ | — |
| $ | — |
|
Total net sales |
| $ | 684,563 |
| $ | 633,341 |
| $ | 542,493 |
| $ | 406,837 |
| $ | 273,771 |
|
Gross profit |
| $ | 288,706 |
| $ | 301,213 |
| $ | 286,493 |
| $ | 306,356 |
| $ | 154,408 |
|
Operating income |
| $ | 129,696 |
| $ | 86,446 |
| $ | 130,758 |
| $ | 226,487 |
| $ | 88,089 |
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. |
| $ | 28,690 |
| $ | (581 | ) | $ | 44,782 |
| $ | 149,919 |
| $ | 57,101 |
|
Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. |
| $ | 0.77 |
| $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 1.23 |
| $ | 4.18 |
| $ | 1.70 |
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. |
| $ | 0.75 |
| $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 1.20 |
| $ | 4.04 |
| $ | 1.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Balance Sheet Highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||
Total Assets |
| $ | 1,575,304 |
| $ | 1,603,312 |
| $ | 1,764,018 |
| $ | 508,766 |
| $ | 342,773 |
|
Total Debt, net |
| $ | 839,270 |
| $ | 903,647 |
| $ | 1,061,848 |
| $ | 1,009 |
| $ | 1,138 |
|
Long-Term Debt, net |
| $ | 772,425 |
| $ | 843,530 |
| $ | 883,612 |
| $ | 874 |
| $ | 1,009 |
|
Total Stockholders’ Equity |
| $ | 598,915 |
| $ | 561,122 |
| $ | 554,457 |
| $ | 463,766 |
| $ | 294,765 |
|
On November 25, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of KUPI. The Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations for Fiscal 2016, 2017 and 2018 includes the impact of KUPI from that date.
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]
41
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis describes significant changes in the financial condition and results of operations, as well as liquidity and capital resources of the Company. Additionally, it addresses accounting policies and estimates that management has deemed are “critical accounting policies.policies and estimates.” This discussion and analysis is intended as a supplement to and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements and other sections of this Form 10-K.
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. You should refer to the “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” set forth in Part I of this Annual Report.
All references to “Fiscal 2019” or “Fiscal Year 2019” shall meanWe report financial information on a quarterly and fiscal year basis with the most recent being the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 and all2021. All references herein to “Fiscal 2018”a “fiscal year” or “Fiscal Year 2018” shall mean“Fiscal” refer to the applicable fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 and all references to “Fiscal 2017” or “Fiscal Year 2017” shall mean the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.
30.
Company Overview
Lannett Company, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, “Lannett”, “we” or “us”) primarily develop, manufacture, package, market and distribute solid oral and extended release (tablets and capsules), topical, liquids, nasal and oral solution finished dosage forms of drugs, generic forms of both small molecule and biologic medications, that address a wide range of therapeutic areas. Certain of these products are manufactured by others and distributed by the Company. The Company also manufactures active pharmaceutical ingredients through its Cody Labs subsidiary, providing a vertical integration benefit. Additionally, the Company is pursuing partnerships, research contracts and internal expansion for the development and production of other dosage forms including: ophthalmic, nasal, patch, foam, buccal, sublingual, suspensions, soft gel, injectable and oral dosages.
On November 25, 2015, the Company completed the acquisition of Kremers Urban Pharmaceutical, Inc. (“KUPI”), the former subsidiary of global biopharmaceuticals company UCB S.A. KUPI is a specialty pharmaceuticals manufacturer focused on the development of products that are difficult to formulate or utilize specialized delivery technologies. Strategic benefits of the acquisition include expanded manufacturing capacity, a diversified product portfolio and pipeline and complementary research and development expertise.
The Company operates pharmaceutical manufacturing plants in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Cody, Wyoming; Carmel, New York and Seymour, Indiana. The Company’s customers include generic pharmaceutical distributors, drug wholesalers, chain drug stores, private label distributors, mail-order pharmacies, other pharmaceutical manufacturers, managed care organizations, hospital buying groups, governmental entities and health maintenance organizations.
JSP Distribution AgreementImpact of COVID-19 Pandemic
OnIn December 2019, the COVID-19 virus emerged in Wuhan, China and spread to other parts of the world. In March 23, 2004,2020, the Company entered into an agreement with JSP (the “JSP Distribution Agreement”World Health Organization (“WHO”) fordesignated COVID-19 a global pandemic. Governments on the exclusive distribution rightsnational, state and local level in the United States, and around the world, have implemented lockdown and shelter-in-place orders, requiring many non-essential businesses to four different JSPshut down operations for the time being. The Company’s business, however, is deemed “essential” and it has continued to operate and has continued to manufacture and distribute its medicines to customers. The Company has developed a comprehensive plan that enables it to maintain operational continuity with an emphasis on manufacturing, distribution and R&D facilities during this crisis, and to date, has not encountered any significant obstacles implementing its business continuity plans. However, the Company continually assesses COVID-19 related developments and adjusts its risk mitigation planning and business continuity activities as needed.
42
In mid-March, 2020, the Company instituted a work from home process for all employees, other than employees in our manufacturing plants, distribution center, and R&D facilities which support manufacturing. For employees who cannot perform their job remotely, the Company has implemented enhanced cleaning and sanitizing procedures, weekly fogging and provided additional personal hygiene supplies and personal protective equipment such as rubber gloves, N95 respirators and powered air-purifying respirator that are in line with Centers for Disease Control and Preventions (“CDC”) recommendations. The Company has also implemented thermal screening for all employees and visitors entering its facilities. Employees are required to adhere to the CDC guidelines, social distancing and any employee experiencing any symptoms of COVID-19 is required to stay home and seek medical attention. Any employee who tests positive for COVID-19 is required to quarantine and is not allowed to return to the facilities without a physician’s release. The Company has closed its facilities to outside persons that are not critical to continuing our operations. In cases where they are essential, visitors undergo a pre-admittance check to include a thermal screening and risk evaluation. The Company has experienced an increase in absenteeism arising from intermittent spikes in cases across the country, which has caused an increase in overtime and cost to produce the products, but to date the rate of employee absenteeism has not had any material effect on the Company’s business or its ability to manufacture and distribute products and plants continue to operate at normal capacity. As the pandemic continues to linger due to variants or limited vaccine supplies, there is an ongoing risk of employee absenteeism which could materially impact the Company’s operations. To date, the Company’s work from home process has not materially impacted the Company’s financial reporting systems or controls over financial reporting and disclosures nor do we expect that the remote work arrangement will have a material impact in the future.
Currently and as anticipated for the near future, the supply chain supporting the Company’s products remains intact, enabling the Company to receive sufficient inventory of the key materials needed across the Company’s network. The Company is experiencing some delays and allocations for certain API and other raw materials of higher demand, which, to date, have not had a material impact on its results of operations. However, the Company is regularly communicating with its suppliers, third-party partners, customers, healthcare providers and government officials in order to respond rapidly to any issues as they arise. The longer the current situation continues, it is more likely that the Company may experience some sort of interruption to its supply chain, and such an interruption could materially affect its business, including but not limited to, our ability to timely manufacture and distribute its products as well as unfavorably impact our results of operations. Additionally, subsequent to an initial stocking up of supplies at the start of the pandemic, the total volume of drug prescriptions written during the pandemic has decreased causing less demand for our products. Specifically, the pandemic has resulted in fewer elective surgeries being performed, causing less demand for our Numbrino cocaine hydrochloride product.
As a result of the pandemic, certain clinical trials which were underway or scheduled to begin were temporarily placed on hold, although all such clinical trials were resumed and have been completed. Such delays impacted the Company’s timing for filing applications for product approvals with the FDA as well as related timing of FDA approval of such filings. Additionally, the pandemic has slowed down the Company’s efforts to expand its product portfolio through acquisitions and distribution opportunities, impacting the speed with which the Company is able to bring additional products to market. While there have been some efforts by some of our customers to increase their inventory levels for the Company’s products in exchangethe near term, the Company has not seen significant increases in demand. The Company does not anticipate any significant changes in demand for 4.0 million sharesits products in the future, however, depending on the duration and severity of the Company’s common stock. On August 19, 2013,outbreak, levels of demand may change.
In light of the economic impacts of COVID-19, the Company entered into an agreement with JSPreviewed the assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of June 30, 2021, including intangible and other long-lived assets. Based on our review, the Company determined that no impairments or other write-downs specifically related to extendCOVID-19 were necessary during the JSP Distribution Agreementfiscal year ended June 30, 2021. Our assessment is based on information currently available and is highly reliant on various assumptions. Changes in market conditions could impact the Company’s future outlook and may lead to continue as the exclusive distributorimpairments in the United States of three JSP products: Butalbital, Aspirin, Caffeine with Codeine Phosphate Capsules USP; Digoxin Tablets USP; and Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets USP. The amendment tofuture.
Based on the JSP Distribution Agreement extended the term of the initial contract, which was due to expire on March 22, 2014, for five years through March 23, 2019. In connection with the amendment,foregoing, the Company issued a totalcannot reasonably predict the ultimate impact of 1.5 million shares of the Company’s common stock to JSP and JSP’s designees.
Net sales of JSP products totaled $253.1 million in fiscal year 2018. Of that amount, Levothyroxine Sodium Tablets USP net sales totaled $245.9 million, with gross margins of approximately 60%, in fiscal year 2018.
After the close of businessCOVID-19 on August 17, 2018, JSP notified the Company that it will not extend or renew the JSP Distribution Agreement when the current term expires on March 23, 2019.
Because products covered by the JSP Distribution Agreement generate a significant portion of our revenues and gross profits, JSP’s decision not to renew or extend its distribution agreement with us will materially adversely affect our future operating results of operations and cash flows beginning indue to the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2019. When announced on August 20, 2018, this resulted in a significant decline incontinued uncertainty around the Company’s market capitalization.
The Company has determined that such nonrenewal represents a “triggering event” under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”)duration and accordingly, will perform an analysis to determine the potential for any impairment of goodwill and certain long-lived assetsseverity of the Company inpandemic.
43
2020 Restructuring Plan
On July 10, 2020, the first quarterBoard of Fiscal 2019. In management’s opinion, the impairment assessment will likely result in a material impairment of goodwill and may result in an impairment of certain long-lived assets; however, at this time the Company cannot estimate the amount or a reasonable range of amounts of such impairment. As of June 30, 2018, the carrying value of goodwill was $339.6 million. Any impairment would result in a noncash charge to earnings in the first quarter of Fiscal 2019.
As noted above, JSP’s decision not to renew or extend its distribution agreement with us will materially adversely affect our future operating results, liquidity and cash flows, which could impact our ability to comply with the financial and other covenants in our Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility. As of June 30, 2018, the Company was in compliance with its financial covenants. As of June 30, 2018, cash and cash equivalents totaled $98.6 million in addition to availability under our undrawn Revolver totaling $125.0 million.
Based on its projections for Fiscal 2019 excluding revenue and related gross profits generated by the products distributed under the JSP Distribution Agreement subsequent to March 23, 2019 and without further analysis of potential restructuring and/or refinancing, the Company expects to have sufficient liquidity and cashflows to meet its operating and debt service requirements for at least the next twelve months from the issuance of the June 30, 2018 consolidated financial statements. The Company also expects to be in compliance with its financial covenants for Fiscal 2019.
Although management cannot predict with certainty the precise impact its plans will have on offsetting the loss of the JSP Distribution Agreement, management is continuing to finalize plans to offset the impact of the loss on a short- and long-term basis. These plans currently include, among other things, an emphasis on reducing cost of sales, research and development (“R&D”) and selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses; continuing to accelerate new product launches; increasing the level of strategic partnerships; and reducing capital expenditures. Management will also continue its emphasis on accelerating ANDA filings. Management also plans to attempt, at the appropriate time, to refinance a significant portion of its outstanding long-term debt to reduce principal repayment requirements and eliminate existing financial covenants, which will increase related interest expense, but will positively impact short-term cash flows.
Cody Restructuring Plan
On June 29, 2018, the Company announcedDirectors authorized a restructuring and cost savings plan related(the “2020 Restructuring Plan”) to the future of Cody Laboratories, Inc.enhance manufacturing efficiencies, streamline operations and reduce the Company’s operations (the “Cody Restructuring Plan”). The plan focuses on a more select set of opportunities which will result in streamlined operations, improved efficiencies and a reduced cost structure. The Company currently estimates that it will incur approximately $5.0 million of total costs to implement the Cody2020 Restructuring Plan comprised primarilywas implemented, in part, as a result of previously anticipated near-term competition and pricing pressure with respect to certain key products. The 2020 Restructuring Plan included lowering operating costs and reducing the workforce by approximately $3.580 positions. The 2020 Restructuring Plan was initiated on July 13, 2020 and completed as of December 31, 2020.
The Company incurred approximately $4.0 million of severance and employee-relatedin severance-related costs of which approximately $3.1 million was recorded in the quarterfiscal year ended June 30, 2018. The Cody Restructuring Plan is expected to generate annualized cost savings of approximately $10.0 million. These amounts are preliminary estimates based on the information currently available to management. It is possible that additional charges and future cash payments could occur in relation to the restructuring actions.
In addition, impairment charges were incurred related to the restructuring plan for Cody Laboratories, Inc. as well as with respect to other corporate initiatives. The Company recorded an impairment charge of approximately $21.5 million relating to the facility, equipment and other plant-related assets primarily associated with the expansion project at Cody Laboratories, Inc.
2016 Restructuring Plan
On February 1, 2016,2021, in connection with the acquisition2020 Restructuring Plan. The Company expects the 2020 Restructuring Plan to result in annual cost savings in excess of KUPI,$15.0 million.
Climate Change
The Company believes in a more sustainable future with a reduced environmental footprint, effective use of natural resources and a multi-pronged approach to reducing our effect on the climate while maintaining our focus on providing affordable medicines to our customers and ultimately the patients who depend on them. Commitment to this belief, however, may come at increased costs to the Company announced a plan relatedincluding, but not limited to, capital investments, additional management and compliance costs, and reduced output, all of which may be material. Costs incurred by our suppliers and vendors to comply with their own sustainability commitments may also be passed through the supply chain resulting in higher operational costs to the future integration of KUPICompany. Climate change and the associated risks continues to evolve over time and could materially impact the Company’s results of operations (the “2016 Restructuring Program”). The plan focuses on the closure of KUPI’s corporate functions and the consolidation of manufacturing, sales, research and development and distribution functions.cash flows in any given year. The Company estimates that it will incur an aggregatemonitors such changes and strives to address these risks in a timely manner.
44
The plan is currently estimated to achieve an ultimate annual run rate of synergies totaling approximately $65.0 million by the end of Fiscal 2020.
These amounts are preliminary estimates based on the information currently available to management. It is possible that additional charges and future cash payments could occur in relation to the restructuring actions.
Financial Summary
For Fiscal 2018, net sales increased to $684.6 million compared to $637.3 million in the same prior-year period. Total net sales, increased to $684.6 million compared to $633.3 million in the prior-year period, which reflected a $4.0 million settlement agreement adjustment. Gross profit decreased $12.5 million to $288.7 million compared to the prior-year period and gross profit percentage decreased to 42% compared to 48% in Fiscal 2017. R&D expenses decreased 31% to $29.2 million compared to the prior-year period while SG&A expenses increased 12% to $82.2 million. Acquisition and integration-related expenses decreased by $3.9 million as compared to the prior-year period. Restructuring expenses totaling $7.1 million were consistent with the $7.2 million recorded in the prior-year period. Operating income for Fiscal 2018, which included a $15.5 million loss on sale of an intangible asset and a $25.0 million assets impairment charge, was $129.7 million compared to $86.4 million in the prior-year period, which included an $88.1 million intangible assets impairment charge. Net income attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. for Fiscal 2018 was $28.7 million, or $0.75 per diluted share. Comparatively, net loss attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. in the prior-year period was $581 thousand, or $0.02 per diluted share.
A more detailed discussion of the Company’s financial results can be found below.
Results of Operations — Fiscal 20182021 compared to Fiscal 20172020
Total net sales increased to $684.6 million from $633.3 million in the prior-year period, which included a $4.0 million reduction for a settlement agreement adjustment.
Net sales increased 7%decreased 12% to $684.6$478.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018.2021. The following table identifies the Company’s net product sales by medical indication for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20182021 and 2017:2020.
| | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||
Medical Indication |
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Analgesic | | $ | 14,684 | | $ | 8,680 |
Anti-Psychosis | |
| 43,720 | |
| 104,934 |
Cardiovascular | |
| 65,987 | |
| 88,576 |
Central Nervous System | |
| 95,115 | |
| 77,256 |
Endocrinology | | | 27,070 | | | — |
Gastrointestinal | |
| 67,540 | |
| 73,477 |
Infectious Disease | | | 67,761 | | | 73,237 |
Migraine | |
| 25,554 | |
| 44,266 |
Respiratory/Allergy/Cough/Cold | |
| 9,258 | |
| 11,576 |
Urinary | |
| 5,786 | |
| 4,225 |
Other | |
| 35,312 | |
| 35,013 |
Contract manufacturing revenue | |
| 20,991 | |
| 24,504 |
Total net sales | | $ | 478,778 | | $ | 545,744 |
(In thousands) |
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, |
| ||||
Medical Indication |
| 2018 |
| 2017 |
| ||
Antibiotic |
| $ | 14,509 |
| $ | 16,748 |
|
Anti-Psychosis |
| 59,557 |
| 58,625 |
| ||
Cardiovascular |
| 64,011 |
| 50,628 |
| ||
Central Nervous System |
| 31,789 |
| 39,451 |
| ||
Gallstone |
| 20,280 |
| 48,600 |
| ||
Gastrointestinal |
| 60,294 |
| 71,887 |
| ||
Glaucoma |
| 6,540 |
| 18,763 |
| ||
Migraine |
| 54,015 |
| 29,014 |
| ||
Muscle Relaxant |
| 13,496 |
| 13,636 |
| ||
Pain Management |
| 23,036 |
| 26,135 |
| ||
Respiratory |
| 7,891 |
| 10,516 |
| ||
Thyroid Deficiency |
| 245,929 |
| 174,005 |
| ||
Urinary |
| 8,661 |
| 14,695 |
| ||
Other |
| 54,720 |
| 47,196 |
| ||
Contract manufacturing revenue |
| 19,835 |
| 17,442 |
| ||
Net sales |
| 684,563 |
| 637,341 |
| ||
Settlement agreement |
| — |
| (4,000 | ) | ||
Total net sales |
| $ | 684,563 |
| $ | 633,341 |
|
The increasedecrease in net sales was driven by increased volumesa decrease in the selling price of $109.5products of $90.1 million partially offset by decreased averageincreased volumes of $23.1 million. The decrease in the selling price of products was primarily driven by lower sales prices of Fluphenazine, which is included within the Anti-Psychosis medical indication, and Posaconazole, which is included in several key products of $62.2 million. Volumes were favorably impactedInfectious Disease medical indication, due to a temporary disruption of our competitor’s supplies innew competitors entering the Thyroid Deficiency and Migraine medical indications, additional sales in the Cardiovascular medical indication related to a distribution agreement entered into with Aralez in November 2017market, as well as lower average selling price across the remaining medical indications. Overall volumes increased customer orders in June 2018, with an estimated impactprimarily due to increased volumes of approximately $15.0 million, in advancePosaconazole and from new product launches, including Levothyroxine Tablets and Capsules, partially offset by lower volumes of a mid-week holiday as well as a related maintenance shutdown of the Company’s Seymour, Indiana manufacturing facility in the first week of July 2018. On August 10, 2018, Aralez filed a Chapter 11 petition in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York and continues to operate its business in the normal course.Fluphenazine. The Company does not believe this will materially affect our distribution agreement with Aralez. Averagehas seen increased competitive market pressure in recent years, which has resulted in overall decreases in selling prices were impacted by competitive pricing pressure across a number of products and sales volume across our product mixportfolio. We have partially offset these competitive pressures with new product launches and changes within distribution channels. Although the Company has benefited in the past from favorable pricing trends, these trends have reversed.will continue to seek opportunities for additional launches.
In January 2017, a provision in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 required drug manufacturers to pay additional rebates to state Medicaid programs if the prices of their generic drugs rise at a rate faster than inflation. The provision negatively impacted the Company’s net sales by $31.0$18.9 million and $35.7 million in Fiscal 20182021 and $10.2 million in Fiscal 2017.
2020, respectively, which contributed to the overall decreased average selling price.
The following chart details price and volume changes by medical indication:indication between Fiscal 2021 and Fiscal 2020:
| | | | | |
| | Sales volume |
| Sales price |
|
Medical indication |
| change % |
| change % | |
Analgesic | | 73 | % | (4) | % |
Anti-Psychosis |
| (29) | % | (29) | % |
Cardiovascular |
| (17) | % | (9) | % |
Central Nervous System |
| 44 | % | (21) | % |
Endocrinology | | 100 | % | — | % |
Gastrointestinal |
| — | % | (8) | % |
Infectious Disease | | 16 | % | (23) | % |
Migraine |
| (17) | % | (25) | % |
Respiratory/Allergy/Cough/Cold |
| (14) | % | (6) | % |
Urinary |
| 26 | % | 11 | % |
Medical indication |
| Sales volume |
| Sales price |
|
Antibiotic |
| (2) | % | (11) | % |
Anti-Psychosis |
| (2) | % | 4 | % |
Cardiovascular |
| 67 | % | (41) | % |
Central Nervous System |
| (10) | % | (9) | % |
Gallstone |
| (18) | % | (40) | % |
Gastrointestinal |
| 5 | % | (21) | % |
Glaucoma |
| (26) | % | (39) | % |
Migraine |
| 87 | % | (1) | % |
Muscle Relaxant |
| 36 | % | (37) | % |
Pain Management |
| (1) | % | (11) | % |
Respiratory |
| (8) | % | (17) | % |
Thyroid Deficiency |
| 30 | % | 11 | % |
Urinary |
| 1 | % | (42) | % |
45
Central Nervous System. Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended Release Tablets (“Methylphenidate ER”)
Per a teleconference in November 2014, the FDA informed KUPI that it was changing the therapeutic equivalence ratingTable of its product from “AB” (therapeutically equivalent) to “BX.” A BX-rated drug is a product for which data are insufficient to determine therapeutic equivalence; it is still approved and can be prescribed, but the FDA does not recommend it as automatically substitutable for the brand-name drug at the pharmacy.Contents
During the November 2014 teleconference, the FDA also asked KUPI to either voluntarily withdraw its product or to conduct new bioequivalence (“BE”) testing in accordance with the recommendations for demonstrating bioequivalence to Concerta proposed in a new draft BE guidance that the FDA issued earlier that November. The Company agreed to conduct new BE studies per the new draft BE guidance. KUPI submitted the data from those studies to the FDA in June 2015 and met with the FDA to discuss the results in July 2015.
On October 18, 2016, the Company received notice from the FDA that it will seek to withdraw approval of the Company’s ANDA for Methylphenidate ER. The FDA’s notice includes an opportunity for the Company to request a hearing on this matter. Following the Company’s request under the FOIA for documents to support its request for a hearing, the FDA granted an extension to submit all data, information and analyses upon which the request for a hearing relies. The FDA has not yet made a decision as to whether to grant a hearing to the Company.
The Company intends to continue working with the FDA to regain the “AB” rating, and in the meantime, maintain the drug on the U.S. market with a BX rating. However, there can be no assurance as to when or if the Company will regain the “AB” rating or be permitted to remain on the market. If the Company were to receive the “AB” rating, net sales of the product could increase subject to market factors existing at that time. The Company also agreed to potential acquisition-related contingent payments to UCB related to Methylphenidate ER if the FDA reinstates the AB-rating and certain sales thresholds are met. Such potential contingent payments are set to expire after December 31, 2020.
In August 2018, the Company entered into an exclusive perpetual licensing agreement with Andor Pharmaceuticals, LLC for Methylphenidate Hydrochloride Extended Release (ER) tablets USP (CII) in 18 mg, 27 mg, 36 mg and 54 mg strengths. Andor’s pending ANDA of Methylphenidate included all bioequivalence metrics recommended by the FDA and is expected to be approved as an AB-rated generic equivalent to the brand Concerta®.
Under the agreement, Lannett will primarily provide sales, marketing and distribution support of Andor’s Methylphenidate ER product, for which it will receive a percentage of the net profits. See Note 22. “Subsequent events” for more information.
Pain Management. Cocaine Topical Solution (“C-Topical”)
In December 2017, a competitor received approval from the FDA to market and sell a Cocaine Hydrochloride topical product. This approval affects the Company’s right to market and sell its unapproved Grandfathered C-Topical product. According to FDA guidance, the FDA typically allows the marketing of unapproved products for up to one year following the approval of an NDA for the product. Subsequently, the Company would not be permitted to market and sell its unapproved C-Topical product. During Fiscal 2018 and 2017, the Company’s net sales of C-Topical were $18.9 million and $21.5 million, respectively.
The competitor’s Cocaine Hydrochloride topical product first appeared in FDA’s Orange Book in January 2018, and the Orange Book listing was updated in February 2018 to include NCE exclusivity. Under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, the grant of NCE exclusivity provides that additional applications for approval of the same product under Section 505(b)(2) may not be submitted to the FDA for approval before the expiration of five years from the date of the approval of the first application. Because the Company submitted its application for approval prior to the date of approval of the competitor’s Cocaine Hydrochloride topical application, the Company does not believe the NCE exclusivity will apply to the Company’s application. In July 2018, the Company received a complete response letter and is in the process of addressing the issues raised by the FDA. The FDA continues to review the Company’s application and in July 2018, issued a Complete Response Letter which required an additional study and other information. The Company cannot say for certain when or if the application will be approved.
At this time, the Company cannot predict the ultimate impact that these developments will have on its business and financial performance, including but not limited to any possible price reductions should the competitor commence marketing and selling its C-Topical product in the future, for how long the Company will continue to be permitted to market and sell C-Topical, or the possible effect on the Company’s pending NDA application.
Gastrointestinal. Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)3350 (“Glycolax”)
On April 2, 2018, the FDA issued a Federal Register notice (Docket No. FDA-2008-N-0549) indicating that it was affirming a preliminary summary judgment decision that the FDA issued in 2014, denying a hearing, and withdrawing all ANDAs for prescription PEG 3350 products, including the Company’s Glycolax product. The FDA’s decision is based on the FDA finding that there are no meaningful differences between Rx PEG 3350 products and OTC PEG 3350 products and, therefore, that the Rx products are misbranded. The FDA ordered the Company’s ANDA withdrawn effective May 2, 2018, after which the Company would no longer be permitted to market or sell its Glycolax product. The Company disputes that there are no meaningful differences and disputes that summary judgment was appropriate in light of the factual issues raised by the ANDA holders. On April 9, 2018, the Company, along with three other PEG 3350 ANDA holders, filed a request for a stay of the FDA order pending appeal of the decision to the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals. On April 16, 2018, the FDA granted a stay of its order withdrawing the Company’s ANDA through November 2, 2018, after which the Company will no longer be permitted to market or sell its Glycolax product. The Company filed an appeal of the FDA withdrawal order to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. In July 2018, the Company filed a brief in support of the appeal. All briefing is scheduled to be completed by September 15, 2018 although the Company is unable to say whether the Court will decide the appeal prior to the November 2, 2018 withdrawal date. During Fiscal 2018 and 2017, the Company’s net sales of Glycolax were $17.9 million and $17.7 million, respectively, although gross profit percentages for this product were in the single-digits in each of these years. At this time, the Company is unable to determine the outcome of this matter and cannot predict when or if the Company’s product will be removed from the market.
The Company sells its products to customers through various distribution channels. The table below presents the Company’s net sales to each distribution channel for the fiscal year ended June 30:
| | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | June 30, | | June 30, | ||
Customer Distribution Channel |
| 2021 |
| 2020 | ||
Wholesaler/Distributor | | $ | 390,356 | | $ | 429,824 |
Retail Chain | |
| 57,120 | |
| 79,606 |
Mail-Order Pharmacy | |
| 10,311 | |
| 11,810 |
Contract manufacturing revenue | |
| 20,991 | |
| 24,504 |
Total net sales | | $ | 478,778 | | $ | 545,744 |
(In thousands) |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||
Wholesaler/Distributor |
| $ | 504,030 |
| $ | 487,969 |
|
Retail Chain |
| 117,331 |
| 82,864 |
| ||
Mail-Order Pharmacy |
| 43,367 |
| 49,066 |
| ||
Contract manufacturing revenue |
| 19,835 |
| 17,442 |
| ||
Net sales |
| 684,563 |
| 637,341 |
| ||
Settlement agreement |
| — |
| (4,000 | ) | ||
Total net sales |
| $ | 684,563 |
| $ | 633,341 |
|
NetThe overall decrease in sales was primarily driven by lower sales of Fluphenazine and Posaconazole due to new competitors entering the market partially offset by sales from new product launches. The Company has seen increased competitive market pressure in recent years, which has resulted in overall decrease in sales to retail chains increased significantlythe distribution channels above. We have partially offset these competitive pressures with new product launches and will continue to seek opportunities for additional launches.
Cocaine Hydrochloride Solution
In December 2017, a competitor received approval from the FDA to market and sell a Cocaine Hydrochloride topical product. In March 2018, in accordance with FDA guidance, the FDA requested the Company cease manufacturing and distributing our unapproved cocaine hydrochloride solution product as a result of an approved product on the market. The Company committed to not manufacture or distribute cocaine hydrochloride 10% solution, which was not sold during Fiscal 2019, and also ceased manufacturing its unapproved cocaine hydrochloride 4% solution on June 15, 2019 and ceased distributing the product on August 15, 2019.
The competitor filed a series of Citizen Petitions beginning in 2019, seeking to block approval of the Company’s Section 505(b)(2) NDA for its cocaine hydrochloride solution product by claiming that the grant of the New Chemical Entity (“NCE”) exclusivity issued to the competitor blocks the approval of the Company’s application for five years. Following the FDA’s rejection of the competitor’s argument and approval of the Company’s Section 505(b)(2) NDA, the competitor filed two lawsuits against the FDA (one in federal court in the District of Columbia and one in federal court in the District of Maryland) seeking a court order in two different federal courts directing the FDA to withdraw approval of the Section 505(b)(2) NDA. To date, neither court has directed the FDA to withdraw the NDA. The Company has intervened in both lawsuits and there are currently cross motions for summary judgment pending in the case filed in federal court for the District of Columbia and a motion to dismiss the complaint filed in the federal court for the District of Maryland.
Separately, on June 6, 2020, the competitor filed a patent infringement complaint, since amended, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, asserting that the Company’s approved cocaine hydrochloride product infringes six patents issued to the competitor. The Company filed an answer and counterclaim, alleging that the Company either does not infringe or that the six asserted patents and three additional salesunasserted patents are invalid. The competitor filed a motion to partially dismiss a customerportion of the counterclaim as to the unasserted patents. The motion to dismiss is pending a determination by the court and discovery is ongoing. The Company continues to market its approved cocaine hydrochloride product.
On August 16, 2021, the Company and the competitor reached an agreement in principle to amicably resolve all pending cases, including the cases in the federal courts in the District of Columbia, District of Maryland and District of Delaware. The parties are working to negotiate and finalize the settlement documents over the next 45 days and have filed motions in each of the courts to stay the cases pending the finalization of the settlement documents.
46
Thalomid®
The Company filed with the FDA an ANDA No. 206601, along with a paragraph IV certification, alleging that the fifteen patents associated with the Thalomid drug product are invalid, unenforceable and/or not infringed. On January 30, 2015, Celgene Corporation and Children’s Medical Center Corporation filed a patent infringement lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that the Company’s filing of ANDA No. 206601 constitutes an act of patent infringement and seeking a declaration that the patents at issue are valid and infringed. A settlement agreement was unablereached, and the Court dismissed the lawsuit in October 2017. Pursuant to obtain supplythe settlement agreement, the Company entered into a license agreement that permitted Lannett to manufacture and market in the U.S. its generic thalidomide product as of August 1, 2019 or earlier under certain circumstances. In the second quarter of Fiscal 2019, the Company received a Major Complete Response Letter (“CRL”) related to issues at its API supplier. The Company filed a response to the CRL. The Company received a second Major CRL in the first quarter of Fiscal 2020 related to continued issues at the API supplier, as well as issues with the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) program hosted by Celgene. On March 26, 2021, the Company received a third Major CRL from the FDA relating to continuing issues with the API supplier. The Company is working on addressing the FDA comments and cannot reasonably predict timing of the product launch.
Ranitidine Oral Solution, USP
As part of an industry-wide action, the Company issued a competitorvoluntary recall on all lots within expiry of Ranitidine Syrup (Ranitidine Oral Solution, USP), 15mg/mL to the consumer level due to levels of N-Nitrosodimethylamine (“NDMA”), a temporary disruptionprobable human carcinogen, above the levels recently established by the FDA. On September 17, 2019, the FDA notified the Company about the possible presence of NDMA in its Ranitidine Oral Solution product and the Company immediately commenced testing and analysis of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) and drug product and confirmed the presence of NDMA. The Company’s net sales of Ranitidine Oral Solution in the competitor’s supply chain,fourth quarter of fiscal year 2019 totaled $1.9 million. On April 1, 2020, the FDA ordered all Ranitidine products (including the Company’s product) withdrawn from the U.S. market and provided guidance on the requirements for submitting additional information to the FDA in order to re-introduce the product to the market. Since initiating the voluntary recall, the Company has not been marketing its Ranitidine Oral Solution product and has no future plans to attempt to re-introduce the product at this time. The Company does not believe the recall will have a lesser extent, additional salessignificant impact on our future expected financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
On June 1, 2020, a productclass action complaint was served upon the Company and approximately forty-five (45) other companies asserting claims for personal injury arising from the presence of NDMA in Ranitidine products. The complaint is consolidated in a multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) pending in the Cardiovascular medical indication relatedUnited States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Similar complaints were filed in state court in New Mexico and state court in Maryland and served upon the Company. Subsequently, a number of similar complaints were served on the Company. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint filed in the MDL which, on December 31, 2020, was granted with leave to amend as to certain of the claims. The plaintiffs filed a distribution agreement entered intoFirst Amended complaint on February 9, 2021, to which the generic manufacturer defendants, including the Company, filed a renewed motion to dismiss all claims. On July 8, 2021, the Court issued an Order granting the motion and dismissing all claims with Aralezprejudice based on federal preemption. Separately, the New Mexico case was conditionally transferred to the MDL, but ultimately remanded back to the state court. Since the Company was not licensed to do business in November 2017.New Mexico and, based upon the information received to date, did not sell Ranitidine in New Mexico, we plan to file a motion to dismiss based, among other things, federal preemption and lack of jurisdiction. Separately, the Company filed a notice to remove and transfer the Maryland case to the MDL which the plaintiff has opposed. On April 1, 2021, the case was remanded back to the state court. On August 17, 2021, Helena Hilbert & William Hilbert III, Individually and on behalf of their minor child "WH", filed a complaint in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas against the Company and approximately seven other defendants, alleging personal injury as a result of using the Company’s Ranitidine products. The Company intends to file a motion to dismiss all of the pending state claims, among other reasons, based on federal preemption. The Company has placed its insurance carrier on notice of the claim and the carrier has appointed counsel to defend the Company.
47
Cost of Sales, including amortization of intangibles. Cost of sales, including amortization of intangibles, for Fiscal 20182021 increased 19%6% to $395.9$403.2 million from $332.1$380.5 million in the same prior-year period. The increase was primarily attributable to higher salesan increase of $13.2 million in write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory, which primarily relates to the Company’s decision to discontinue 23 lower margin product lines, as well as increasedadditional volumes from new product royalties. Product royalties expense includedlaunches. The Company also recorded $5.0 million in costconsideration to renew the Company’s distribution agreement with Recro Gainesville, LLC (“Recro”) during the second quarter of sales totaled $29.7 million for Fiscal 2018 and $19.0 million for Fiscal 2017. Amortization expense included in cost of sales totaled $32.1 million for Fiscal 2018 and for Fiscal Year 2017.2021.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for Fiscal 20182021 decreased 4%54% to $288.7$75.6 million or 42%16% of total net sales. In comparison, gross profit for Fiscal 20172020 was $301.2$165.2 million or 48%30% of total net sales. The decrease in gross profit percentage was primarily attributable to lower volumes of Fluphenazine, which had higher than average gross profit margins, as well as overall lower average selling prices of certain key productsour products. The Company also recorded an increase in the write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory as well as additional product royalties relatedconsideration to arenew the distribution agreement entered into with AralezRecro in November 2017.the second quarter of Fiscal 2021.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased 31%19% to $29.2$24.2 million in Fiscal 20182021 from $42.1$30.0 million in Fiscal 2017.2020. The decrease was primarily due to lower R&D expenses as a result of timing of certain milestones related to product development expensesprojects as well as decreased spendemployee headcount reductions related to the C-Topical clinical trials. Research and development expenses decreased due to a credit in Fiscal 2018 for a cancelled order of pre-launch inventory purchased in Fiscal 2017.2020 Restructuring Plan.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 12%decreased 14% to $82.2$68.1 million in Fiscal 20182021 compared with $73.5$79.5 million in Fiscal 2017.2020. The increasedecrease was primarily driven by approximately $5.1a lower branded prescription drug fee, lower incentive-based compensation, lower expenses at the Company’s Cody Labs subsidiary and other cost reduction initiatives.
Asset impairment charges. In Fiscal 2021, the Company recorded various asset impairment charges totaling $216.6 million. The Company reviewed its product portfolio during Fiscal 2021 and decided to discontinue 23 lower gross margin product lines, including product lines that were acquired through various past business and product acquisitions. As a result of the discontinuance and the reduction in net sales and gross margin of certain other product lines, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $193.0 million related to separation benefitsthe KUPI product rights intangible assets. The impairment charge is primarily a result of the decline in net sales and gross margin of certain product lines acquired in connection with the KUPI acquisition, including those product lines being discontinued. In addition, the Company recorded a $17.0 million impairment charge to its intangible asset for former executive officersa distribution and supply agreement with Cediprof, Inc., which is included within the other product rights category of definite-lived intangible assets, as well as other former employees. Additional headcounta result of increased competition and lower projected cash flows for the Levothyroxine product. The Company also recorded a $5.0 million impairment charge to its KUPI in-process research and development intangible asset due to delays in the expected launch of a product within the portfolio, which results in reduced projected cash flows. See Note 8 “Goodwill and Intangible Assets” for more information.
Other Loss. Interest expense for the year ended June 30, 2021 totaled $53.8 million compared to $66.8 million for the year ended June 30, 2020. The decrease was due to a lower average debt balance in Fiscal 2018 also contributed to an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses.
The Company is focused on controlling operating expenses and has implemented its 2016 Restructuring Plan and Cody Restructuring Plan as noted above, however increases in personnel and other costs to facilitate enhancements in the Company’s infrastructure and expansion may continue to impact operating expenses in future periods.
Acquisition and Integration-related Expenses. Acquisition and integration-related expenses decreased $3.9 million2021 as compared to the prior-year period. The decrease wasas well as a lower weighted-average interest rate due to the timingfull repayment of the acquisition of KUPI.
Restructuring Expenses. Restructuring expenses of $7.1 million for Fiscal Year 2018 were consistent to the prior-year period primarily due to higher employee separation costs incurredoutstanding Term Loan A in connection with the 2016 Restructuring Program during Fiscal 2017, offset by an additional $3.1 million of employee separation costs incurred in connection with the Cody Restructuring program in Fiscal 2018.
Loss on sale of intangible asset. In the third quarter of Fiscal 2018, the Company sold an intangible asset acquired as part of the KUPI acquisition. In connection with the transaction, the Company recorded a $15.5 million loss on sale of intangible asset.
Asset impairment charges. In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2018, the Company recorded impairment charges totaling $25.0 million, of which $21.5 million relates to the Cody Restructuring Plan and $3.5 million resulting from the consolidation of the Company’s manufacturing activities with respect to plant-related assets located at the Company’s Townsend Road facility.
In Fiscal 2017, as a result of a notice from the FDA that it will seek to withdraw approval of the Company’s ANDA for Methylphenidate ER, the Company recorded a $65.1 million impairment charge in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. Additionally, the Company abandoned a project within KUPI’s in-process research and development portfolio, which resulted in a $23.0 million impairment charge in the second quarter of Fiscal 2017.
Other Income (Loss). Interest expense for the period ended June 30, 2018 totaled $85.6 million compared to $89.4 million for the period ended June 30, 2017.November 2020. The weighted average interest rate for Fiscal 20182021 and 20172020 was 8.7%8.0% and 8.0%8.8%, respectively. Investment income totaled $4.8The Company also recorded a $10.3 million in Fiscal 2018 compared with $3.8 million in Fiscal 2017. In December 2017,loss on extinguishment of debt related to the Company received $3.5 million as partpayoff of the settlement of a patent litigation. See Note 11 “Legal, Regulatory Matters and Contingencies” for further details.Term Loan B Facility during Fiscal 2021.
Income Tax. The Company recorded income tax expense in Fiscal 20182021 of $22.4$60.6 million compared to income tax expensebenefit of $1.1$15.3 million in Fiscal 2017.2020. The effective tax rate for Fiscal 20182021 was 43.8%(20.0)%, compared to 199.5%31.4% for Fiscal 2017.2020. The effectiveincome tax rateexpense recorded in Fiscal 2021 was primarily driven by the full valuation allowance recorded against the Company’s deferred tax assets. See Note 17 “Income Taxes” for more information.
Net Loss. For the periodyear ended June 30, 2018 was lower compared to the same prior-year period primarily due to the impact of higher pre-tax income and a lowered blended U.S. statutory rate from 35.0% to 28.1% as a result of the 2017 Tax Reform, partially offset by a $13.1 million re-measurement of the U.S. deferred tax assets, or 25.6% as a result of the 2017 Tax Reform. Overall, the Company anticipates the decrease in the U.S. federal statutory rate, which is 21% for the entire Fiscal 2019, will have a favorable impact on future U.S. tax expense and operating cash flows.
Net Income. For the period ended June 30, 2018,2021, the Company reported net income attributable to Lannett Company, Inc.loss of $28.7$363.5 million, or $0.75$(9.23) per diluted share. Comparatively, net loss attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. in the corresponding prior-year period was $581 thousand,$33.4 million, or $0.02$(0.86) per diluted share.
48
Results of Operations — Fiscal 20172020 compared to Fiscal 20162019
Total net sales, which included a $4.0 million reduction for an adjustment to the Fiscal 2016 Settlement Agreement amount, increased to $633.3 million from $542.5 million in the prior-year period, which included a $23.6 million reduction for the Fiscal 2016 Settlement Agreement. The Fiscal 2016 Settlement Agreement relates to a Settlement Agreement Release and Mutual Release with one of the Company’s former customers.
Net sales increased 13%decreased 17% to $637.3$545.7 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017.2020. The following table identifies the Company’s approximate net product sales by medical indication for the fiscal years ended June 30, 20172020 and 2016:2019. The medical indication categories for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019 were reclassified to better align with industry standards and the Company’s peers.
| | | | | | | |||||||
(In thousands) |
| Fiscal Year Ended June 30, |
| | Fiscal Year Ended June 30, | ||||||||
Medical Indication |
| 2017 |
| 2016 |
|
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||||
Antibiotic |
| $ | 16,748 |
| $ | 14,558 |
| ||||||
Analgesic | | $ | 8,680 | | $ | 8,251 | |||||||
Anti-Psychosis |
| 58,625 |
| 5,462 |
| |
| 104,934 | |
| 73,453 | ||
Cardiovascular |
| 50,628 |
| 53,541 |
| |
| 88,576 | |
| 101,467 | ||
Central Nervous System |
| 39,451 |
| 36,291 |
| |
| 77,256 | |
| 59,019 | ||
Gallstone |
| 48,600 |
| 67,348 |
| ||||||||
Endocrinology | |
| — | |
| 197,522 | |||||||
Gastrointestinal |
| 71,887 |
| 52,699 |
| |
| 73,477 | |
| 63,043 | ||
Glaucoma |
| 18,763 |
| 25,336 |
| ||||||||
Infectious Disease | |
| 73,237 | |
| 16,950 | |||||||
Migraine |
| 29,014 |
| 21,776 |
| |
| 44,266 | |
| 41,592 | ||
Muscle Relaxant |
| 13,636 |
| 5,403 |
| ||||||||
Obesity |
| 3,956 |
| 3,809 |
| ||||||||
Pain Management |
| 26,135 |
| 29,804 |
| ||||||||
Respiratory |
| 10,516 |
| 9,982 |
| ||||||||
Thyroid Deficiency |
| 174,005 |
| 162,411 |
| ||||||||
Respiratory/Allergy/Cough/Cold | |
| 11,576 | |
| 12,479 | |||||||
Urinary |
| 14,695 |
| 17,398 |
| |
| 4,225 | |
| 6,755 | ||
Other |
| 43,240 |
| 38,230 |
| |
| 35,013 | |
| 51,517 | ||
Contract manufacturing revenue |
| 17,442 |
| 22,043 |
| |
| 24,504 | |
| 23,359 | ||
Net sales |
| 637,341 |
| 566,091 |
| ||||||||
Settlement agreement |
| (4,000 | ) | (23,598 | ) | ||||||||
Total net sales |
| $ | 633,341 |
| $ | 542,493 |
| | $ | 545,744 | | $ | 655,407 |
The increasedecrease in net sales was primarily driven by additional sales of KUPI products of $87.9 million due to the timing of the acquisition as well as increaseddecreased volumes of $21.5$79.4 million partially offset byand, to a lesser extent, decreased average selling price of products of $38.2$30.3 million. Overall volumes decreased primarily due to the loss of Levothyroxine sales associated with the expiration of the JSP Distribution Agreement, partially offset by additional volumes from product launches and increased market share in certain key products. Average selling prices were impacted by competitive pricing pressure across a number of products, product mix and changesprice decreases in certain key products due to competitive pricing pressures. Although the Company has benefited in the past from favorable pricing trends, these trends have reversed. Net sales within the infectious disease category increased significantly as a result of the distribution channels.and supply agreement with Sinotherapeutics Inc., which was signed in August 2019, to distribute Posaconazole tablets.
EffectiveIn January 2017, a provision in the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 required drug manufacturers to pay additional rebates to state Medicaid programs if the prices of their generic drugs rise at a rate faster than inflation. The provision negatively impacted the Company’s net sales by $10.2$35.7 million and $30.8 million in Fiscal 2017.2020 and Fiscal 2019, respectively, which contributed to the overall decreased average selling price.
The following chart details price volume and acquisitionvolume changes by medical indication:indication between Fiscal 2020 and Fiscal 2019:
| | | | | |
| | Sales volume | | Sales price | |
Medical indication |
| change % |
| change % | |
Analgesic |
| 25 | % | (20) | % |
Anti-Psychosis |
| 33 | % | 10 | % |
Cardiovascular |
| (12) | % | (1) | % |
Central Nervous System |
| 47 | % | (16) | % |
Endocrinology | | (100) | % | — | % |
Gastrointestinal |
| 16 | % | 1 | % |
Infectious Disease | | 346 | % | (14) | % |
Migraine | | 21 | % | (14) | % |
Respiratory/Allergy/Cough/Cold | | (5) | % | (2) | % |
Urinary |
| (34) | % | (3) | % |
Medical indication |
| Sales volume |
| Sales price |
| Acquisition |
|
Antibiotic |
| 59 | % | (44 | )% | — |
|
Anti Psychosis |
| 13 | % | 960 | % | — |
|
Cardiovascular |
| (1 | )% | (30 | )% | 26 | % |
Central Nervous System |
| (9 | )% | (31 | )% | 49 | % |
Gallstone |
| (16 | )% | (12 | )% | — |
|
Gastrointestinal |
| 5 | % | (29 | )% | 60 | % |
Glaucoma |
| (2 | )% | (24 | )% | — |
|
Migraine |
| 49 | % | (16 | )% | — |
|
Muscle Relaxant |
| 339 | % | (187 | )% | — |
|
Obesity |
| 27 | % | (23 | )% | — |
|
Pain Management |
| 1 | % | (13 | )% | — |
|
Respiratory |
| (16 | )% | (19 | )% | 40 | % |
Thyroid Deficiency |
| 12 | % | (5 | )% | — |
|
Urinary |
| (26 | )% | (38 | )% | 50 | % |
49
The Company sells its products to customers through various distribution channels. The table below presents the Company’s net sales to each distribution channel for the fiscal year ended June 30:
| | | | | | |
(In thousands) | | June 30, | | June 30, | ||
Customer Distribution Channel |
| 2020 |
| 2019 | ||
Wholesaler/Distributor | | $ | 429,824 | | $ | 529,717 |
Retail Chain | |
| 79,606 | |
| 80,944 |
Mail-Order Pharmacy | |
| 11,810 | |
| 21,387 |
Contract manufacturing revenue | |
| 24,504 | |
| 23,359 |
Total net sales | | $ | 545,744 | | $ | 655,407 |
(In thousands) |
| June 30, |
| June 30, |
| ||
Wholesaler/Distributor |
| $ | 487,969 |
| $ | 419,375 |
|
Retail Chain |
| 82,864 |
| 84,614 |
| ||
Mail-Order Pharmacy |
| 49,066 |
| 40,059 |
| ||
Contract manufacturing revenue |
| 17,442 |
| 22,043 |
| ||
Net sales |
| 637,341 |
| 566,091 |
| ||
Settlement agreement |
| (4,000 | ) | (23,598 | ) | ||
Total net sales |
| $ | 633,341 |
| $ | 542,493 |
|
NetOverall net sales decreased primarily due to the loss of the Levothyroxine sales associated with the expiration of the JSP Distribution Agreement, partially offset by additional volumes from product launches and increased market share in certain key products. The decrease in sales to wholesaler/distributor andwholesalers, as well as mail-order pharmacies, increasedwas also primarily as a result of additional net sales relateddue to the KUPI acquisition. Net sales to retail chain decreased as a resultloss of strategic partnerships within the industry, in which certain retailers have begun to submit orders through the wholesalers.Levothyroxine sales.
Cost of Sales, including amortization of intangibles. Cost of sales, including amortization of intangibles, for Fiscal 2017 increased $76.12020 decreased 8% to $380.5 million to $332.1 million.from $411.8 million in the same prior-year period. The increasedecrease was primarily attributable to additionalthe loss of Levothyroxine sales associated with the expiration of the JSP Distribution Agreement as well as lower cost of sales from KUPI due to the timingas a result of the acquisition,Company’s decision to cease operations at Cody Labs, partially offset by the effectsadditional volumes of purchase accountingother products sold as well as increased product royalties expense related to the amortization of inventory step-up of $17.0 million in Fiscal 2016. Product royalties expense included in cost of sales totaled $19.0 million for Fiscal 2017 and $17.0 million for Fiscal 2016. Amortization expense included in cost of sales totaled $32.1 million for Fiscal 2017 and $18.6 million for Fiscal 2016. The increase primarily reflected additional amortization of the acquired intangibles from the acquisition of KUPI.various distribution agreements.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 increased 5%Fiscal 2020 decreased 32% to $301.2$165.2 million or 48%30% of total net sales. In comparison, gross profit for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016Fiscal 2019 was $286.5$243.6 million or 53%37% of total net sales. The decrease in gross profit percentage was primarily attributable to the dilutive impactloss of KUPI products,Levothyroxine sales mix, changes within distribution channels, additional amortizationassociated with the expiration of intangibles,the JSP Distribution Agreement, which had higher than average gross profit margins, price decreases across our product portfolio as well as amortization of inventory step-up and depreciation of property, plant and equipmentincreased product royalties related to the acquisitionvarious distribution agreements, partially offset by manufacturing efficiencies as a result of KUPI.cost reduction initiatives and an increase in volumes of certain key products with higher than average gross margins.
Research and Development Expenses. Research and development expenses decreased 7%23% to $42.1 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared to $45.1$30.0 million in the prior-year period.Fiscal 2020 from $38.8 million in Fiscal 2019. The decrease was primarily due to lower product development and bio-equivalency studiesR&D expenses inas a result of the fiscal year ended 2017, partially offset by an increase dueCompany’s decision to cease operations at Cody Labs as well as the timing of the KUPI acquisition, as well as a $3.8 million write-off of inventorycertain milestones related to the delay of an anticipated approval.product development projects.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 8%decreased 9% to $73.5$79.5 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017in Fiscal 2020 compared with $68.3$87.6 million in the prior-year period.Fiscal 2019. The increasedecrease was primarily due todriven by lower financial advisory costs, a decrease in regulatory-related costs, lower expenses at the timing of the KUPI acquisition, which resulted in additional selling, generalCompany’s Cody Labs subsidiary and administrative expenses. Increased headcountother cost reduction initiatives, partially offset by a branded prescription drug fee as well as additionalincreased legal and consulting costs also contributed to the increase.
The Company is focused on controlling operating expenses and has implemented its 2016 Restructuring Plan as noted above, however increases in personnel and other costs to facilitate enhancements in the Company’s infrastructure and expansion may continue to impact operating expenses in future periods.
Acquisition and Integration-related Expenses. Acquisition and integration-related expenses decreased $23.2 million to $4.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 compared with $27.2 million compared to the prior-year period. The decrease was due to higher costs during Fiscal 2016 associated with the acquisition of KUPI.
Restructuring Expenses. Restructuring expenses were consistent with the prior-year period as a result of an increase in facility closure costs, offset by a decrease in employee separation costs.
Asset Impairment Charges. On October 18, 2016,impairment charges. In Fiscal 2020, the Company received notice from the FDA that it will seek to withdraw approval of the Company’s ANDA for Methylphenidate ER. As a result of the notice,recorded various asset impairment charges totaling $34.4 million. During Fiscal 2020, the Company performed an impairment analysis includingof its AB-rated Methylphenidate Hydrochloride product, which is distributed under a review of revised net sales projections for Methylphenidate ER. This analysis resultedlicense agreement with Andor, due to significant declines in the Company recordingprojected profitability of the distribution arrangement. As a $65.1 million impairment charge inresult of the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. Additionally, in the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company abandoned a project within KUPI’s in-process research and development portfolio. The value assigned to the project was $23.0 million. Accordingly,analysis, the Company recorded a $23.0$14.0 million impairment charge. The Company also performed an annual impairment analysis of our indefinite-lived intangible assets. As a result, the Company recorded a $9.0 million and an $8.0 million impairment charge into its KUPI IPR&D and Silarx IPR&D assets, respectively, due to the second quarter.abandonment of several pipeline products within both portfolios. The Company recorded a ROU lease asset totaling $1.2 million related to an existing lease at Cody Labs upon adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 and subsequently recorded a full impairment of the asset as a result of the decision to cease operations at Cody Labs.
50
Other Income (Loss). Interest expense in Fiscal 2017 totaled $89.4 million compared to $65.9 million infor the prior-year period. The fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 included approximately seven months of interest expense related2020 totaled $66.8 million compared to $84.6 million for the acquisition of KUPIyear ended June 30, 2019. The decrease was due to a lower average debt balance in Fiscal 2020 as compared to the twelve months ended June 30, 2017.prior-year period as well as a lower weighted-average interest rate due to the partial repayment of the outstanding Term Loan A balance with proceeds from the issuance of the 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes. The weighted average interest rate for Fiscal 20172020 and 2019 was 8.0%.8.8% and 9.7%, respectively. Investment income totaled $1.6 million in Fiscal 2017 totaled $3.82020 compared with $3.2 million compared to investment income of $368 thousand in the prior-year period.Fiscal 2019.
The Company also recorded a $3.0 million loss on extinguishment of debt related to the repurchase of the 12.0% Senior Notes in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016.
Income Tax. The Company recorded income tax expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017benefit in Fiscal 2020 of $1.1$15.3 million compared to $17.3income tax benefit of $74.1 million in Fiscal 2019. The effective tax rate for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016.Fiscal 2020 was 31.4%, compared to 21.4% for Fiscal 2019. The effective tax rate for the fiscal yearperiod ended June 30, 20172020 was 199.5%, compared to 27.9% for the prior-year period. The increase in the effective tax rate in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 ashigher compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 wassame prior-year period primarily due to the impact of state deferred income tax in Fiscal 2017 relative to pre-tax income.
At June 30, 2017 and 2016,the CARES Act which allowed the Company had recognized a net deferredto carryback its 2020 taxable loss into its Fiscal 2015 tax asset of $52.8 million and $52.4 million, respectively.year, where the statutory tax rate was 35%. The net deferredincrease was slightly offset by excess tax assets as of June 30, 2017 and 2016 are reduced by a valuation allowance of $6.4 million and $3.9 million, respectively, which are primarilyshortfalls related to the realizability of deferred tax assets for various states, the impairment on the Cody note receivablestock compensation as well as foreign net operating losses. The Company increased the valuation allowance in Fiscal 2017 primarily related to an increase of state deferred tax assets.a non-deductible branded prescription drug fee.
Net Income (Loss). For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017,2020, the Company reported net loss attributable to Lannett Company, Inc. of $581 thousand,$33.4 million, or $0.02 basic and$(0.86) per diluted per share. Comparatively, net income attributable to Lannett Company, Inc.loss in the corresponding prior-year period was $44.8$272.1 million, or $1.23 basic and $1.20$(7.20) per diluted share.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flow
Until November 25, 2015, the date of the KUPI acquisition, theThe Company had historically financedfinances its operations with cash flow generated from operations supplemented with borrowings from various government agencies and financial institutions.has $45.0 million available to draw upon under the Amended ABL Credit Facility, which is discussed further below. At June 30, 2018,2021, working capital was $326.0$263.1 million as compared to $302.6$228.3 million at June 30, 2017,2020, an increase of $23.4$34.8 million. Current product portfolio sales as well as sales related to future product approvals are anticipated to continue to generate positive cash flow from operations.
Net cash fromprovided by operating activities of $118.5$60.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20182021 reflected net incomeloss of $28.7$363.5 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $155.5$441.0 million, as well as cash used by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $65.7$16.6 million. In comparison, net cash from operating activities of $165.4$116.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172020 reflected net loss of $547 thousand,$33.4 million, adjustments for non-cash items of $170.7$110.7 million, as well as cash usedprovided by changes in operating assets and liabilities of $4.8$38.7 million.
Significant changes in operating assets and liabilities from June 30, 20172020 to June 30, 20182021 are comprised of:
· An increase
● | A decrease in accounts receivable of $26.9 million mainly due tothe overall decrease in sales, as well as the timing of sales and cash receipts.The Company’s days sales outstanding (“DSO”) at June 30, 2021, based on gross sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 and gross accounts receivable at June 30, 2021, was 77 days. The level of DSO at June 30, 2021 was comparable to the Company’s expectation that DSO will be in the 70 to 85-day range based on customer payment terms. |
● | An increase in income taxes receivable totaling $20.4 million primarily due to additional estimated tax refunds related to provisions of the CARES Act and an anticipated Fiscal 2021 taxable loss, partially offset by income tax receipts of $36.8 million. |
● | A decrease in rebates payable of $19.2 million primarily due to lower sales of Fluphenazine in Fiscal 2021, which had higher than average government-related rebates. |
● | A decrease in royalties payable of $7.1 million primarily due to lower sales of distributed products with royalty arrangements in Fiscal 2021. |
51
· An increase in inventories of $19.0 million primarily due to the timing of customer order fulfillment as well as an expanded product portfolio at June 30, 2018 as compared to the prior-year.
· An increase in rebates payable of $4.8 million primarily due to an increase in sales to government programs as well as the timing of processed rebates.
· A decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses totaling $5.0 million and $5.1 million, respectively, due to the timing of payments.
● | A decrease in accrued payroll and payroll-related costs of $5.6 million primarily related to payments made in August 2020 in connection with incentive-based compensation accrued in Fiscal Year 2020 as well as lower incentive-based compensation accrued in Fiscal Year 2021. |
Significant changes in operating assets and liabilities from June 30, 20162019 to June 30, 20172020 are comprised of:
● | A decrease in accounts receivable of $39.1 million mainly due to the timing of sales and cash receipts, as well as adjustments to wholesale acquisition pricing to our customers. The Company’s days sales outstanding (“DSO”) at June 30, 2020, based on gross sales for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 and gross accounts receivable at June 30, 2020, was 61 days. The level of DSO at June 30, 2020 was significantly lower than the Company’s expectation that DSO will be in the 70 to 85-day range based on customer payment terms, due to higher gross sales in the three months ended March 31, 2020 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2020. |
● | An increase in accounts payable totaling $19.0 million primarily due to the timing of vendor invoices and payments. |
● | An increase in prepaid income taxes totaling $14.5 million primarily due to the carryback of the Company’s Fiscal 2020 taxable loss into the Fiscal 2015 tax year as a result of the CARES Act as well as tax payments made in Fiscal 2020. |
· An increase in prepaid income taxes totaling $17.7 million mainly due to estimated tax payments made during Fiscal 2017 relative to estimated taxable income.
· An increase in inventories of $7.7 million primarily due to the timing of customer order fulfillment.
· An increase in rebates payable of $14.4 million due to an increase in rebate-eligible sales to government programs as well as the timing of processed rebates.
· An increase in accounts payable totaling $5.0 million due to the timing of payments.
Net cash used in investing activities of $51.2$14.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 2021 was primarily due to purchasesmainly the result of investment securities of $63.6 million, purchases of property, plant and equipment of $52.3 million, loan advances to a variable interest entity of $10.3$10.4 million and purchases of intangible assets of $19.0$4.5 million. Net cash used in investing activities of $40.0 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 was mainly the result of purchases of intangible assets of $28.8 million and purchases of property, plant and equipment of $18.3 million, partially offset by proceeds from the sale of investment securitiesproperty, plant and equipment of $94.0$7.4 million.
Net cash used in investingfinancing activities of $58.7$92.2 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 20172021 was primarily due to purchasesdebt repayments of investment securities of $77.9$437.9 million and purchasespayment of property, plant and equipmentdebt issuance costs of $48.7$10.1 million, partially offset by proceeds from issuance of long-term debt of $356.2 million. The financing activities during Fiscal 2021 were primarily related to the sale of investment securities of $67.8 million.
refinancing in April 2021. Net cash used in financing activities of $86.2$71.9 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 2020 was primarily due to debt repayments of $85.7$146.7 million, purchase of capped calls in connection with the 4.50% Convertible Senior Notes offering totaling $7.1 million, payments of debt issuance costs totaling $3.5 million, and purchases of treasury stock totaling $4.6$1.9 million, partially offset by proceeds from issuance of stock pursuant to stock compensation plans4.50% Convertible Senior Notes of $4.1 million. Net cash used in financing activities of $213.8 million for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 was primarily due to debt repayments of $178.2 million, payment of contingent consideration to UCB of $35.0 million, purchases of treasury stock totaling $1.9$86.3 million and purchase of the noncontrolling interest in Realty of $1.5 million, partially offset by proceeds from issuancesale of stock pursuant to stock compensation plans of $2.8$1.0 million.
Credit Facility and Other Indebtedness
The Company has previously entered into and may enter future agreements with various government agencies and financial institutions to provide additional cash to help finance the Company’s acquisitions, various capital investments and potential strategic opportunities. These borrowing arrangements as of June 30, 20182021 are as follows:
Amended7.750% Senior Secured Credit FacilityNotes due 2026
On November 25, 2015,April 22, 2021, the Company issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.750% senior secured notes due 2026 (the “Notes”) in a private placement to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and outside the United States to persons other than U.S. persons in reliance upon Regulation S under the Securities Act. The Notes bear interest semi-annually in arrears on April 15 and October 15 of each year, beginning on October 15, 2021, at a rate of 7.750% per annum in cash. The Notes will mature on April 15, 2026, unless earlier redeemed or repurchased in accordance with their terms.
52
Second Lien Secured Loan Facility
On April 5, 2021, the Company entered into an Exchange Agreement with certain participating lenders to exchange a portion of their existing Term B Loans for Second Lien Loans pursuant to a new $190.0 million Second Lien Secured Loan Facility (“Second Lien Facility”). On April 22, 2021, in connection with its acquisitionthe issuance of KUPI, Lannettthe Notes and the entrance into the Amended ABL Credit Facility, which is discussed further below, the exchange between the Company and the participating lenders was consummated. From the Closing Date until the one-year anniversary of the Closing Date, the Second Lien Loans bear 10.0% PIK interest. Thereafter, the Second Lien notes will bear 5.0% cash interest and 5.0% PIK interest until maturity, except to the extent the Company elects to pay all or portion of the PIK interest in cash. The Second Lien Loans will mature on July 21, 2026. In connection with the Second Lien Facility, the Company issued to the Participating Lenders warrants to purchase up to 8,280,000 shares of common stock of the Company (the “Warrants”) at an exercise price of $6.88 per share. The Warrants were issued on April 22, 2021 with an eight-year term. The Participating Lenders received registration rights with respect to the shares of common stock of the Company to be received upon exercise of the Warrants. The holders of the Warrants are entitled to receive dividends or distributions of any kind made to the common stockholders to the same extent as if the holder had exercised the Warrant into common stock. The Warrants are considered participating securities under ASC 260, Earnings per share.
Amended ABL Credit Facility
On December 7, 2020, the Company entered into a credit and guaranty agreement, which provided for an asset-based revolving credit facility (the “Credit“ABL Credit Facility”) of up to $30 million, subject to borrowing base availability, and included letter of credit and swing line sub-facilities. On April 22, 2021, the Company entered into an amendment to that certain Credit and Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 7, 2020 (such agreement as so amended, the “Amended ABL Credit Agreement”), among the Company, certain of its wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries party thereto, as borrowers or as guarantors, Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc.,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as administrative agent and as collateral agent and the other lenders providingparty thereto, for a senior securedthe purpose of, among other things, increasing the aggregate amount of the revolving credit facility (the “Senior Securedfrom $30.0 million to $45.0 million and extending the maturity thereof to the fifth anniversary of the closing date of Notes Offering (subject to a springing maturity as set forth therein).
The Amended ABL Credit Facility”). The Senior Secured Credit Facility consisted of Term Loan A in an aggregate principal amount of $275.0 million, Term Loan B in an aggregate principal amount of $635.0 million andAgreement provides for a revolving credit facility providing for revolving loans(the “Amended ABL Credit Facility”) that includes letter of credit and swing line sub-facilities. Borrowing availability under the Amended ABL Credit Facility is determined by a monthly borrowing base collateral calculation that is based on specified percentages of eligible accounts receivable less certain reserves and subject to certain other adjustments as set forth in an aggregate principal amountthe Amended ABL Credit Agreement. Availability is reduced by issuance of up to $125.0 million. Asletters of June 30, 2018, there was no balancecredit as well as any borrowings. Loans outstanding under the revolving credit facility.
On June 17, 2016, Lannett amendedAmended ABL Credit Agreement bear interest at a floating rate measured by reference to, at the Senior SecuredCompany’s option, either an adjusted London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) (subject to a floor of 0.75%) plus an applicable margin of 2.50% per annum, or an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin of 1.50% per annum. Unused commitments under the Amended ABL Credit Facility andare subject to a fee of 0.50% per annum, which fee increases to 0.75% per annum for any quarter during which the Company’s average usage under the Amended ABL Credit and Guaranty Agreement to raise an incremental term loan in the principal amount of $150.0 million (the “Incremental Term Loan”) and amended certain sections of the agreement (the “Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility”). The terms of this Incremental Term Loan are substantially the same as those applicable to the Term Loan B. The Company used the proceeds of the Incremental Term Loan and cash on hand to repurchase the outstanding $250.0 million aggregate principal amount of Lannett’s 12.0% Senior Notes due 2023 (the “Senior Notes”) issued inFacility is less than $5.0 million.
In connection with the KUPI acquisition.
The Term Loan ASecond Lien Facility, will mature on November 25, 2020. The Term Loan A Facility amortizesthe Company is required to maintain at least $5.0 million in quarterly installments (a) through December 31, 2017 in amounts equal to 1.25% of the original principal amount of the Term Loan A Facility and (b) from January 1, 2018 through September 30, 2020 in amounts equal to 2.50% of the original principal amount of the Term Loan A Facility, with the balance payable on November 25, 2020. The Term Loan B Facility will mature on November 25, 2022. The Term Loan B Facility amortizes in equal quarterly installments in amounts equal to 1.25% of the original principal amount of the Term Loan B Facility with the balance payable on November 25, 2022. Any outstanding Revolving Loans will mature on November 25, 2020.
The Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility is guaranteed bya deposit account at all of Lannett’s significant wholly-owned domestic subsidiaries (the “Subsidiary Guarantors”) and is collateralized by substantially all present and future assets of Lannett and the Subsidiary Guarantors.
The interest rates applicable to the Amended Term Loan Facility are based on a fluctuating rate of interest of the greater of an adjusted LIBOR and 1.00%, plus a borrowing margin of 4.75% (for Term Loan A Facility) or 5.375% (for Term Loan B Facility). The interest rates applicable to the Revolving Credit Facility is based on a fluctuating rate of interest of an adjusted LIBOR plus a borrowing margin of 4.75%. The interest rate applicable to the unused commitment for the Revolving Credit Facility was initially 0.50%. Since March 2016, the interest margins and unused commitment fee on the Revolving Credit Facility have beentimes subject to control by the Second Lien Collateral Agent, and a leveraged based pricing grid.
The Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility contains a numberminimum cash balance of covenants that, among other things, limit the ability of Lannett and its restricted subsidiaries to: incur more indebtedness; pay dividends; redeem stock or make other distributions of equity; make investments; create restrictions on the ability of Lannett’s restricted subsidiaries that are not Subsidiary Guarantors to pay dividends to Lannett or make intercompany transfers; create negative pledges; create liens; transfer or sell assets; merge or consolidate; enter into sale leasebacks; enter into certain transactions with Lannett’s affiliates; and prepay or amend the terms of certain indebtedness.
The Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility contains a financial performance covenant that is triggered when the aggregate principal amount of outstanding Revolving Credit Facility and outstanding letters of credit$15.0 million as of the last day of each month. At June 30, 2021, the most recent fiscal quarterCompany classified the $5.0 million required deposit account balance as restricted cash, which is greater than 30%included in other assets caption in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
53
4.50% Convertible Senior Notes due 2026
On September 27, 2019, the Company issued $86.3 million aggregate principal amount of the aggregate commitments4.50% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Convertible Notes”) in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Revolving Credit Facility.Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The covenant provides that Lannett shall not permit its first lien netConvertible Notes are senior secured leverage ratio asunsecured obligations of the last dayCompany and bear interest at an annual rate of 4.50% payable semi-annually in arrears on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning on April 1, 2020. The Convertible Notes will mature on October 1, 2026, unless earlier repurchased, redeemed or converted in accordance with their terms. The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion rate of 65.4022 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes (which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $15.29 per share), subject to adjustments upon the occurrence of certain events (but will not be adjusted for any four consecutive fiscal quarters (i) fromaccrued and unpaid interest). The Company may redeem all or a part of the Convertible Notes on or after December 31, 2015,October 6, 2023 at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes redeemed, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, up to, but excluding, the redemption date, subject to certain conditions relating to the Company’s stock price having been met. Following certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date or if the Company delivers a notice of redemption, the Company will, in certain circumstances, increase the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its Convertible Notes in connection with such corporate event or notice of redemption. The indenture covering the Convertible Notes contains certain other customary terms and covenants, including that upon certain events of default occurring and continuing, either the trustee or holders of at least 25% in principal amount of the outstanding Convertible Notes may declare 100% of the principal of, and accrued and unpaid interest on, all the Convertible Notes to be greater than 4.25:1.00 (ii) fromdue and after December 31, 2017 to be greater than 3.75:1.00 and (iii) from and after December 31, 2019 to be greater than 3.25:1.00.payable.
The Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility also contains a financial performance covenant forIn connection with the benefitoffering of the Term Loan A Facility lenders which providesConvertible Notes, the Company also entered into privately negotiated “capped call” transactions with several counterparties. The capped call transaction will initially cover, subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments, the number of shares of common stock that Lannett shall not permit its net senior secured leverage ratio asinitially underlie the Convertible Notes. The capped call transactions are expected to generally reduce the potential dilutive effect on the Company’s common stock upon any conversion of the last day of any four consecutive fiscal quarters (i) priorConvertible Notes with such reduction subject to December 31, 2017, to be greater than 4.25:1.00, (ii) as of December 31, 2017 and prior to December 31, 2019 to be greater than 3.75:1.00 and (iii) as of December 31, 2019 and thereafter to be greater than 3.25:1.00. The Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility also contains certain affirmative covenants, including financial and other reporting requirements.a cap which is initially $19.46 per share.
Other Liquidity Matters
Refer to the “JSP Distribution Agreement”“Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic” section above for the impact of the nonrenewal of the JSP agreement on our future liquidity.
Future Acquisitions
We are continuously evaluating the potential for product and company acquisitions as a part of our future growth strategy. In conjunction with a potential acquisition, the Company may utilize current resources or seek additional sources of capital to finance any such acquisition, which could have an impact on future liquidity.
We may also from time to time depending on market conditions and prices, contractual restrictions, our financial liquidity and other factors, seek to prepay outstanding debt or repurchase our outstanding debt through open market purchases, privately negotiated purchases, or otherwise. The amounts involved in any such transactions, individually or in the aggregate, may be material and may be funded from available cash or from additional borrowings.
54
Contractual Obligations
The following table represents material annual contractual obligations as of June 30, 2018:2021:
|
|
|
| Less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
| More than 5 |
| |||||
(In thousands) |
| Total |
| year |
| 1-3 years |
| 3-5 years |
| Years |
| |||||
Long-Term Debt |
| $ | 897,287 |
| $ | 66,845 |
| $ | 278,466 |
| $ | 551,976 |
| $ | — |
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
| 11,414 |
| 1,835 |
| 3,261 |
| 2,160 |
| 4,158 |
| |||||
Purchase Obligations |
| 24,710 |
| 24,710 |
| — |
| — |
| — |
| |||||
Interest on Obligations |
| 225,989 |
| 64,680 |
| 107,606 |
| 53,703 |
| — |
| |||||
Total |
| $ | 1,159,400 |
| $ | 158,070 |
| $ | 389,333 |
| $ | 607,839 |
| $ | 4,158 |
|
Less than 1 More than 5 (In thousands) Total year 1-3 years 3-5 years Years Long-Term Debt (1) $ 631,950 $ — $ — $ 350,000 $ 281,950 Interest on Obligations (1) 278,580 30,885 84,991 87,342 75,362 Operating Lease Obligations (2) 18,939 2,051 4,147 4,228 8,513 Asset Purchase Payment Obligations (3) 13,627 1,250 12,377 — — Total $ 943,096 $ 34,186 $ 101,515 $ 441,570 $ 365,825
(1) | Long-term debt |
(2) | Operating lease obligations primarily relate to an eight-year lease for the Company’s headquarters in Trevose, Pennsylvania as well as a 116,000 square foot leased warehouse in Seymour, Indiana. |
(3) | The asset purchase payment obligation above refers to the consideration due to Andor Pharmaceuticals, LLC for the AB-rated Methylphenidate Hydrochloride perpetual license agreement. |
In the Company’s Amended Senior Secured Credit Facility. Refer to Note 10 “Long-Term Debt” for additional information. Interest on obligations was calculated based on interest rates in effect at June 30, 2018.
The purchase obligations above are primarily related tonormal course of business, the Company may enter into noncancelable open purchase orders for API and has various ongoing capital expenditure projects.projects that may result in contractual obligations. Under the terms of the License and Collaboration Agreement with HEC to develop an insulin glargine product, the Company agreed to fund up to the initial $32 million of the development costs and split 50/50 any development costs in excess thereof. As of June 30, 2021, the Company has incurred approximately $4 million of development costs towards the $32 million commitment made by the Company. Under the terms of a separate License and Collaboration Agreement with HEC and affiliates to develop a biosimilar insulin aspart product, the Company agreed to fund up to the initial $32 million of the development costs, provided that if total development and other costs paid by Lannett are less than $32 million then the difference will be paid to Sunshine over the first year of commercialization. As of June 30, 2021, the Company has not yet incurred material costs towards the $32 million commitment made by the Company. Refer to Note 11 “Commitments” for additional information.
Operating lease obligations primarily relate to a 116,000 square foot leased warehouse in Seymour, Indiana as well as a 25 year lease with Forward Cody, which commenced on April 2015.
Research and Development Arrangements
In the normal course of business, the Company has entered into certain research and development and other arrangements. As part of these arrangements, the Company has agreed to certain contingent payments, which generally become due and payable only upon the achievement of certain developmental, regulatory, commercial and/or other milestones. In addition, under certain arrangements, we may be required to make royalty payments based on a percentage of future sales, or other metric, for products currently in development in the event that the Company begins to market and sell the product. Due to the inherent uncertainty related to these developmental, regulatory, commercial and/or other milestones, it is unclear if the Company will ever be required to make such payments. As such, these contingencies are not reflected in the expected cash requirements for Contractual Obligations in the table above.
55
Critical Accounting Policies
and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities & Exchange Commission requires the use of estimates and assumptions. A listing of the Company’s significant accounting policies areis detailed in Note 2 “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.” A subsection of these accounting policies havehas been identified by management as “Critical Accounting Policies.Policies and Estimates.” Critical accounting policies and estimates are those which require management to make estimates using assumptions that were uncertain at the time the estimates were made and for which the use of different assumptions, which reasonably could have been used, could have a material impact on the financial condition or results of operations.
Management has identified the following as “Critical Accounting Policies”Policies and Estimates”: Revenue Recognition, Inventories, Income Taxes, Business Combinations,and Valuation of Long-Lived Assets, including Goodwill and Intangible Assets, In-Process Research and Development and Share-based Compensation.Assets.
Revenue Recognition
The Company complies with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which superseded ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue when title and risk of loss of promised goods or services have transferred to the customer at an amount that reflects the consideration the Company is expected to be entitled. Our revenue consists almost entirely of sales of our pharmaceutical products to customers, whereby we ship product to a customer pursuant to a purchase order. Revenue contracts such as these do not generally give rise to contract assets or contract liabilities because: (i) the underlying contracts generally have only a single performance obligation and provisions for estimates, including rebates, promotional adjustments, price adjustments, returns, chargebacks and other potential adjustments are reasonably determinable.(ii) we do not generally receive consideration until the performance obligation is fully satisfied. The new revenue standard also impacts the timing of the Company’s revenue recognition by requiring recognition of certain contract manufacturing arrangements to change from “upon shipment or delivery” to “over time.” However, the recognition of these arrangements over time does not currently have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position. The Company also considers all other relevant criteria specified in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Topic No. 13, “Revenue Recognition,” in determining when to recognize revenue.adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method.
When revenue is recognized, a simultaneous adjustment to gross sales is made for estimated chargebacks, rebates, returns, promotional adjustments and other potential adjustments. These provisions are primarily estimated based on historical experience, future expectations, contractual arrangements with wholesalers and indirect customers and other factors known to management at the time of accrual. Accruals for provisions are presented in the Consolidated Financial Statements as a reduction to gross sales with the corresponding reserve presented as a reduction of accounts receivable or included as rebates payable. The reserves presented as a reductionpayable, depending on the nature of accounts receivable totaled $249.2 million and $175.8 million at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, respectively. Rebates payable at June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017 totaled $49.4 million and $44.6 million, respectively, which is comprisedthe reserve.
56
The following table identifies the activity and ending balances of each major category of revenue reserve for fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016:
Reserve Category |
| Chargebacks |
| Rebates |
| Returns |
| Other |
| Total |
| |||||
Balance at June 30, 2015 |
| $ | 35,801 |
| $ | 20,498 |
| $ | 19,209 |
| $ | 1,528 |
| $ | 77,036 |
|
Additions related to the KUPI acquisition |
| 49,333 |
| 38,471 |
| 20,498 |
| 6,455 |
| 114,757 |
| |||||
Current period provision |
| 646,926 |
| 189,210 |
| 21,298 |
| 49,976 |
| 907,410 |
| |||||
Credits issued during the period |
| (645,565 | ) | (194,095 | ) | (20,412 | ) | (41,108 | ) | (901,180 | ) | |||||
Balance at June 30, 2016 |
| 86,495 |
| 54,084 |
| 40,593 |
| 16,851 |
| 198,023 |
| |||||
Additions related to the KUPI acquisition |
| — |
| 8,329 |
| 5,955 |
| — |
| 14,284 |
| |||||
Current period provision |
| 881,283 |
| 297,050 |
| 25,416 |
| 53,398 |
| 1,257,147 |
| |||||
Credits issued during the period |
| (888,241 | ) | (271,847 | ) | (29,829 | ) | (59,153 | ) | (1,249,070 | ) | |||||
Balance at June 30, 2017 |
| 79,537 |
| 87,616 |
| 42,135 |
| 11,096 |
| 220,384 |
| |||||
Current period provision |
| 1,141,995 |
| 296,784 |
| 24,024 |
| 69,898 |
| 1,532,701 |
| |||||
Credits issued during the period |
| (1,068,498 | ) | (301,898 | ) | (23,100 | ) | (60,973 | ) | (1,454,469 | ) | |||||
Balance at June 30, 2018 |
| $ | 153,034 |
| $ | 82,502 |
| $ | 43,059 |
| $ | 20,021 |
| $ | 298,616 |
|
For the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, as a percentage of gross sales the provision for chargebacks was 52.0%, 47.0% and 44.6%, respectively, the provision for rebates was 13.5%, 15.8% and 13.0%, respectively, the provision for returns was 1.1%, 1.4% and 1.5%, respectively and the provision for other adjustments was 3.2%, 2.8% and 3.4%, respectively.
The increase in total reserves from June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018 was mainly due to an increase in the chargebacks reserve, which was the result of a higher chargeback rate associated with the distribution agreement entered into with Aralez in November 2017. The chargebacks reserve also increased due to higher inventory levels on-hand at the Company’s wholesaler customers as of June 30, 2018 as compared to June 30, 2017. In addition, a change in the Company’s billing practices required by one of our major wholesaler customers resulted in a shift from rebates to chargebacks with no significant change to the total reserve balance. The activity in the “Other” category includes shelf-stock, shipping and other sales adjustments including prompt payment discounts. The increase in this reserve category for Fiscal 2018 as compared to the prior-year period was a result of sales adjustments related to the inability to fulfill certain customer orders. Historically, we have not recorded any material amounts in the current period related to reversals or additions of prior period reserves. If the Company were to record a material reversal or addition of any prior period reserve amount, it would be separately disclosed.
Provisions for chargebacks, rebates, returns and other adjustments require varying degrees of subjectivity. While rebates generally are based on contractual terms and require minimal estimation, chargebacks and returns require management to make more subjective assumptions. Each major category is discussed in detail below:
Chargebacks
The provision for chargebacks is the most significant and complex estimate used in the recognition of revenue. The Company sells its products directly to wholesale distributors, generic distributors, retail pharmacy chains and mail-order pharmacies. The Company also sells its products indirectly to independent pharmacies, managed care organizations, hospitals, nursing homes and group purchasing organizations, collectively referred to as “indirect customers.” The Company enters into agreements with its indirect customers to establish pricing for certain products. The indirect customers then independently select a wholesaler from which to purchase the products. If the price paid by the indirect customers is lower than the price paid by the wholesaler, the Company will provide a credit, called a chargeback, to the wholesaler for the difference between the contractual price with the indirect customers and the wholesaler purchase price. The provision for chargebacks is based on expected sell-through levels by the Company’s wholesale customers to the indirect customers and estimated wholesaler inventory levels. As sales to the large wholesale customers, such as Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen and McKesson increase (decrease), the reserve for chargebacks will also generally increase (decrease). However, the size of the increase (decrease) depends on product mix and the amount of sales made to indirect customers with which the Company has specific chargeback agreements. The Company continually monitors the reserve for chargebacks and makes adjustments when management believes that expected chargebacks may differ from the actual chargeback reserve.
Rebates
Rebates are offered to the Company’s key chain drug store, distributor and wholesaler customers to promote customer loyalty and increase product sales. These rebate programs provide customers with credits upon attainment of pre-established volumes or attainment of net sales milestones for a specified period. Other promotional programs are incentive programs offered to the customers. Additionally, as a result of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“PPACA”) enacted in the U.S. in March 2010, the Company participates in a new cost-sharing program for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries designed primarily for the sale of brand drugs and certain generic drugs if their FDA approval was granted under a NDA or 505(b) NDA versus an ANDA. Because our drugs used for the treatment of thyroid deficiency and our Morphine Sulfate Oral Solution product were both approved by the FDA as 505(b)(2) NDAs, they are considered “brand” drugs for purposes of the PPACA. Drugs purchased within the Medicare Part D coverage gap (commonly referred to as the “donut hole”) result in additional rebates. The Company estimates the reserve for rebates and other promotional credit programs based on the specific terms in each agreement when revenue is recognized. The reserve for rebates increases (decreases) as sales to certain wholesale and retail customers increase (decrease). However, since these rebate programs are not identical for all customers, the size of the reserve will depend on the mix of sales to customers that are eligible to receive rebates.
Returns
Consistent with industry practice, the Company has a product returns policy that allows customers to return product within a specified time period prior to and subsequent to the product’s expiration date in exchange for a credit to be applied to future purchases. The Company’s policy requires that the customer obtain pre-approval from the Company for any qualifying return. The Company estimates its provision for returns based on historical experience, changes to business practices, credit terms and any extenuating circumstances known to management. While historical experience has allowed for reasonable estimations in the past, future returns may or may not follow historical trends. The Company continually monitors the reserve for returns and makes adjustments when management believes that actual product returns may differ from the established reserve. Generally, the reserve for returns increases as net sales increase.
57
Other Adjustments
Other adjustments consist primarily of price adjustments, also known as “shelf-stock adjustments” and “price protections,” which are both credits issued to reflect increases or decreases in the invoice or contract prices of the Company’s products. In the case of a price decrease, a credit is given for product remaining in customer’s inventories at the time of the price reduction. Contractual price protection results in a similar credit when the invoice or contract prices of the Company’s products increase, effectively allowing customers to purchase products at previous prices for a specified period of time. Amounts recorded for estimated shelf-stock adjustments and price protections are based upon specified terms with direct customers, estimated changes in market prices and estimates of inventory held by customers. The Company regularly monitors these and other factors and evaluates the reserve as additional information becomes available. Other adjustments also include prompt payment discounts.
Inventoriesdiscounts and “failure-to-supply” adjustments. If the Company is unable to fulfill certain customer orders, the customer can purchase products from our competitors at their prices and charge the Company for any difference in our contractually agreed upon prices.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value determined by the first-in, first-out method. Inventories are regularly reviewed and write-downs for excess and obsolete inventory are recorded based primarily on current inventory levels, expiration date and estimated sales forecasts. While estimated sales forecasts are subjective in nature, the projections allow management to reasonably predict the net realizable value of current inventory based on expected demand. A decrease in the estimated sales forecasts would indicate the need to write-down excess and obsolete inventory. Management continuously monitors the market activity and assesses inventory levels.
Income Taxes
The Company uses the liability method to account for income taxes as prescribed by ASC 740, Income Taxes.Taxes. Deferred taxes are recorded to reflect the tax consequences on future years of events that the Company has already recognized in the financial statement or tax returns. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are adjusted to recognize the effect of changes in tax law or tax rates in the period during which the new law is enacted. Under ASC 740, Income Taxes, a valuation allowance is required when it is more likely than not that all or some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized through generating sufficient future taxable income. Failure to achieve forecasted taxable income in applicable tax jurisdictions could affect the ultimate realization of deferred tax assets and could result in an increase in the Company’s effective tax rate on future earnings.
The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position claimed on a tax return only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The benefit from uncertain tax positions recorded in the financial statements was immaterial for all periods presented.
The Company’s future effective income tax rate is highly reliant on future projections of taxable income, tax legislation, and potential tax planning strategies. A change in any of these factors could materially affect the effective income tax rate of the Company in future periods.
Business Combinations
Acquired businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting, which requires that the assets acquired and liabilities assumed be recorded at the date of acquisition at their respective estimated fair values. The fair values and useful lives assigned to each class of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are based on, among other factors, the expected future period of benefit of the asset, the various characteristics of the asset and projected future cash flows. Significant judgment is employed in determining the assumptions utilized as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent measurement period. Accordingly, changes in assumptions described above could have a material impact on our consolidated results of operations.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets, including Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company’s long-lived assets primarily consist of property, plant and equipment definite and indefinite-liveddefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill.
assets.
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the assets’ estimated useful lives, generally for periods ranging from 5 to 39 years. Definite-lived intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and are amortized on a straight-line basis over the assets’ estimated useful lives, generally for periods ranging from 105 to 15 years. The Company continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
58
Property, plant and equipment and definite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances (“triggering events”) indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. The nature and timing of triggering events by their very nature are unpredictable; however, management regularly considers the performance of an asset as compared to its expectations, industry events, industry and economic trends, as well as any other relevant information known to management when determining if a triggering event occurred.
If a triggering event is determined to have occurred, the first step in the impairment test is to compare the asset’s carrying value to the undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows of the asset, then an impairment exists. An impairment loss is measured as the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value, which in most cases is calculated using a discounted cash flow model. Discounted cash flow models are highly reliant on various assumptions which are considered Level 3 inputs, including estimates of future cash flows (including long-term growth rates), discount rates and the probability of achieving the estimated cash flows. Management regularly reviews estimated future cash flows for reasonableness and considers how recent activity, including a triggering event, may impact those projections. Management also compares various industry benchmarks when determining the discount rate to use in an impairment. A higher (lower) estimate of future cash flows and/or discount rate would result in a larger (smaller) impairment. assessment. The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value can materially impact our results of operations. There can be no assurances as to when, or if, future impairments may occur.
Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, including in-process research and development, are not amortized. Instead, goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually duringRecent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2016, the fourth quarterFASB issued ASU 2016-13, Measurement of each fiscal year, or more frequently whenever events or triggering events indicate that the asset might be impaired. The Company utilizes a quantitative assessment to determine the fair value of our reporting unit (generic pharmaceuticals). If the net book value of our reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the difference will be recorded as a goodwill impairment, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. The Company’s fair value assessments are highly reliantCredit Losses on various assumptionsFinancial Instruments, which are considered Level 3 inputs, including estimates of future cash flows (including long-term growth rates), discount rates and the probability of achieving the estimated cash flows. The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset can materially impact our results of operations. There can be no assurances as to when, or if, future impairments may occur. The Company has one reportable segment and one reporting unit, generic pharmaceuticals.
In-Process Research and Development
Acquired businesses are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting. The acquisition purchase price is allocated to the net assets of the acquired business at their respective fair values. Amounts allocated to in-process research and development are recorded at fair value and are considered indefinite-lived intangible assets subject tochanges the impairment testing in accordance withmodel used to measure credit losses for most financial assets. We are required to recognize an allowance that reflects the Company’s impairment testing policy for indefinite-lived intangible assets as described above. As products in development are approved for sale, amounts willcurrent estimate of credit losses expected to be allocated to product rights and will be amortizedincurred over their estimated useful lives. Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the expected life of the asset. The Company’s fair value assessments are highly reliant on various assumptions which are considered Level 3 inputs,financial asset, including estimates of future cash flows (including long-term growth rates), discount rates and the probability of achieving the estimated cash flows. The judgments made in determining the estimated fair value of in-process research and development, as well as asset lives, can materially impact our results of operations. There can be no assurances as to when, or if, future impairments may occur.
Share-based Compensation
Share-based compensation costs are recognized over the vesting period, using a straight-line method, based on the fair value of the instrument on the date of grant less an estimate for expected forfeitures.trade receivables. The Company uses the Black-Scholes valuation model to determine the fair value of stock options, the stock price on the grant date to value restricted stock and the Monte-Carlo simulation model to determine the fair value of performance-based shares. The Black-Scholes valuation and Monte-Carlo simulation models include various assumptions, including the expected volatility, the expected life of the award, dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate.
Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of our common shares during the historical period equal to the expected term of the option. The Company uses historical information to estimate the expected term, which represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for the period equal to the expected life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The forfeiture rate assumption is the estimated annual rate at which unvested awards are expected to be forfeited during the vesting period. This assumption is based on our actual forfeiture rate on historical awards. Periodically, management will assess whether it is necessary to adjust the estimated rate to reflect changes in actual forfeitures or changes in expectations. Additionally, the expected dividend yield is equal to zero, as the Company has not historically issued and has no immediate plans to issue, a dividend. These assumptions involve inherent uncertainties based on market conditions which are generally outside the Company’s control. Changes in these assumptions could have a material impact on share-based compensation costs recognizedadopted this guidance in the financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issuedfirst quarter of Fiscal 2021. The adoption of ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The authoritative guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Based on a review of the contracts representing a substantial portion of our revenues, the Company does2016-13 did not expect the guidance to have a material impact on our disclosures or the timing and recognition of our revenues. The majority of the Company’s revenues is generated from product sales and based on the Company’s initial assessment, it currently does not anticipate a material impact to the revenue and disclosures related to these arrangements. Under the new standard, the Company will need to estimate certain amounts as variable consideration at the point of product sale in future periods. The Company does not anticipate a material impact on revenue related to these variable amounts which need to be estimated earlier under the new standard.
The new revenue standard will also impact the timing of the Company’s revenue recognition by requiring recognition of certain contract manufacturing arrangements to move from upon shipment or delivery to over-time. However, the recognition of these arrangements over-time is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021.
The Company is finalizing the establishment and documentation of key accounting policies, conducting training and education throughout the organization, and evaluating impacts on business processes, information technology, and controls resulting from the adoption of this new standard. The Company also continues to accumulate the necessary information to determine the cumulative effects of the accounting change to be recorded upon adoption of the guidance, but the magnitude of this adjustment is not expected to be material. The Company intends to use the modified retrospective approach upon implementation with the cumulative effect of applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application.
In November 2015,August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes — Balance Sheet Classification2020-06, Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options and Derivatives and Hedging - Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity, with changes to modify and simplify the application of Deferred Taxes.U.S. GAAP for certain financial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. ASU 2015-17 requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The guidance may be applied either prospectively or retrospectively. The guidance became effective for the Company in the first quarter of Fiscal 2018. Accordingly, the Company currently presents all deferred tax assets and liabilities as noncurrent on the balance sheet. All prior period amounts have also been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires an entity to recognize right-of-use assets and liabilities on its balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Lessees and lessors are required to disclose quantitative and qualitative information about leasing arrangements to enable a user of the financial statements to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-022020-06 is effective for annual reporting periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018,2021, including interim periods within that reporting period and requires a modified retrospective application,those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently inASU requires adoption using either the process of assessingretrospective basis or the impact this guidance will have on the consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows — Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. ASU 2016-15 addresses how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2017.modified retrospective basis. The Company is currently in the process of assessingevaluating the impact this guidance will haveof ASU 2020-06 on the consolidated financial statements.its Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
On November 25, 2015, in connection withDuring the acquisition of KUPI,fiscal year ended June 30, 2021, the Company entered into apaid off our outstanding, variable-rate Senior Secured Credit Facility which was subsequently amended in June 2016. Based onwith cash and the variable-rate debt outstanding at June 30, 2018, each 1/8% increase in interest rates would yield $1.1 million of incremental annual interest expense.
proceeds from new fixed-rate debt. The Company has historically invested in equity securities, U.S. government agency securities and corporate bonds, which are exposed to market and interest rate fluctuations. The market value, interest and dividends earned on these investments may vary based on fluctuations in interest rate and market conditions.
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Consolidated Financial Statements and Report of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm is set forth in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Consolidated Financial Statements” and incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
59
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act, as amended, for financial reporting as of June 30, 2018.2021. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that these controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as specified in SEC rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to our management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. There were no changes in these controls or procedures identified in connection with the evaluation of such controls or procedures that occurred during our last fiscal quarter, or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect these controls or procedures.
Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. These disclosure controls and procedures include, among other things, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The report of management of the Company regarding internal control over financial reporting is set forth in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Consolidated Financial Statements: Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting “andReporting” and incorporated herein by reference.
Attestation Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting is set forth in Item 15 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Consolidated Financial Statements: Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and incorporated herein by reference.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended June 30, 2018,2021, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
None.
60
PART III
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors and Executive Officers
The directors and executive officers of the Company are set forth below:
| | | | | ||
|
| Age |
|
| Position | |
Directors: |
|
|
|
| ||
| | | | | ||
Patrick G. LePore |
|
|
| Chairman of the Board | ||
| | | | | ||
John C. Chapman |
|
|
| Director | ||
| | | | | ||
Timothy C. Crew |
|
|
| Director | ||
| | | | | ||
David Drabik |
|
|
| Director | ||
| | | | | ||
Jeffrey Farber |
|
|
| Director | ||
| | | | | ||
Melissa Rewolinski |
| |||||
|
|
| Director | |||
| | | | |||
|
|
| ||||
| ||||||
Paul Taveira |
|
|
| Director | ||
| | | | | ||
Officers: | | |
|
| ||
| | | | |||
| ||||||
Timothy C. Crew |
|
|
| Chief Executive Officer | ||
| | | | | ||
John Kozlowski |
| |||||
|
|
| Vice President of Finance, | |||
| | | | | ||
John M. Abt |
|
|
| Vice President and Chief Quality and Operations Officer | ||
| | | | | ||
Maureen M. Cavanaugh |
|
|
| Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Operations Officer | ||
| | | | | ||
Robert Ehlinger |
|
|
| Vice President and Chief Information Officer | ||
| | | | | ||
Samuel H. Israel |
|
|
| General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer | ||
| | | | |||
|
|
|
Patrick G. LePore was appointed as a Director of the Company in July 2017. On July 1, 2018, Mr. LePore succeeded Mr. Farber as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Mr. LePore served as chairman, Chief Executive Officer and president of ParPAR Pharmaceuticals, Inc., until the company’s acquisition by private equity investor TPG in 2012. He remained as chairman of the new company where he ledthrough the sale of the company to Endo Pharmaceuticals. Mr. LePore began his career with Hoffmann LaRoche. Later, he founded Boron LePore and Associates, a medical communications company, which he took public and was eventually sold to Cardinal Health. HeMr. LePore is a memberthe Vice Chairman of the board of directorsMatinas BioPharm. On September 10, 2020, Mr. LePore was appointed as a director of PharMerica and Innoviva, and is a trusteethe board of Villanova University.VYNE Therapeutics, Inc. Mr. LePore earned his bachelor’s degree from Villanova University and Master of Business Administration from Fairleigh Dickinson University.
The Governance and Nominating Committee concluded that Mr. LePore is well qualified and should be nominated to serve as a Director due, in part, to his understanding and experience as a Chief Executive Officer and Director of highly regarded companies within the pharmaceutical industry. Mr. LePore is an independent director as defined by the rules of the NYSE.
61
John C. Chapman was appointed as a Director of the Company in July 2018. Mr. Chapman is a retired audit partner for KPMG, having specialized in providing audit services to large complex multinational pharmaceutical and consumer market companies. During his tenure at KPMG, he served for six years as a member of the firm’s board of directors and for several years as KPMG’s global chair of pharmaceuticals and chemicals. Mr. Chapman also served as global lead partner for some of KPMG’s largest clients, including Pfizer, Hoechst and PepsiCo, among others. Mr. Chapman, a certified public accountant, (CPA), earned a Bachelor of Business Administration in accounting practice degree from Pace University, New York. On August 21, 2018, Mr. Chapman was appointed as Chairman of the Audit Committee, effective upon filing of the Company’s Fiscal 2018 consolidated financial statements.
The Governance and Nominating Committee concluded that Mr. Chapman is well qualified and should be nominated to serve as a Director, due to his extensive experience in the public accounting profession. Additionally, Mr. Chapman has significant experience in dealing with acquisitions, divestitures, initial public offerings and secondary offerings. Mr. Chapman is an independent director as defined by the rules of the NYSE.
Timothy C. Crew was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a Director of the Company in January 2018. Mr. Crew has more than 2530 years of experience in the generic and branded pharmaceutical industries. Previously, he served as Chief Executive Officer of Cipla North America, a global pharmaceutical company based in Mumbai, India. Before Cipla, he worked for eight years at Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. (“Teva”), where he ultimately served as Senior Vice President and Commercial Operating Officer of the North American Generics division, the world’s largest generic operation with multibillion dollars of annual sales. Before that, he was Teva’s Vice President, Alliances and Business Development. Mr. Crew was also an Executive Vice President, North America, for Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd. Mr. Crew began his pharmaceutical career at Bristol-Myers Squibb, where he held a number of senior management positions in global marketing, managed healthcare, marketing, business development and strategic planning. Prior to his pharmaceutical roles, Mr. Crew served in the United States Army, where he rose to the rank of Captain. Mr. Crew earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics from Pomona College and a Masters of Business Administration degree from Columbia Business School.
The Governance and Nominating Committee concluded that Mr. Crew is well qualified and should be nominated to serve as a Director due, in part, to his understanding and experience as a Chief Executive Officer and Director of highly regarded companies within the pharmaceutical industry.
David Drabik was elected a Director of the Company in January 2011. Mr. Drabik is a National Association of Corporate Directors Governance Fellow. Since 2002, Mr. Drabik has been President of Cranbrook & Co., LLC (“Cranbrook”), an advisory firm primarily serving the private equity and venture capital community. At Cranbrook, Mr. Drabik assists and advises its clientele on originating, structuring and executing private equity and venture capital transactions. From 1995 to 2002, Mr. Drabik served in various roles and positions with UBS Capital Americas (and its predecessor UBS Capital LLC), a New York City based private equity and venture capital firm that managed $1.5 billion of capital. From 1992 to 1995, Mr. Drabik was a banker with Union Bank of Switzerland’s Corporate and Institutional Banking division in New York City. Mr. Drabik graduated from the University of Michigan with a Bachelor of Business Administration degree.
The Governance and Nominating Committee concluded that Mr. Drabik is well qualified and should be nominated to serve as a Director due, in part, to his understanding and involvement in investment banking. As a global investment bank professional with extensive experience advising senior management, his skills include business analytics, financing and a strong familiarity with SEC documentation. Mr. Drabik is an independent director as defined by the rules of the NYSE.
Jeffrey Farber was appointed a Director of the Company in May 2006 and was appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors in July 2012. OnIn July 2018, Patrick LePore succeeded Jeffrey Farber as the Chairman of the Board. Jeffrey Farber joined the Company in August 2003 as Secretary. Since 1994, Mr. Farber has been President and the owner of Auburn Pharmaceutical (“Auburn”), a national generic pharmaceutical distributor. Prior to starting Auburn, Mr. Farber served in various positions at Major Pharmaceutical (“Major”), where he was employed for over 15 years. At Major, Mr. Farber was involved in sales, purchasing and eventually served as President of the Midwest division. Mr. Farber also spent time working at Major’s manufacturing division, Vitarine Pharmaceuticals, where he served on its Board of Directors. Mr. Farber graduated from Western Michigan University with a BachelorsBachelor of Science Degree in Business Administration and participated in the Pharmacy Management Graduate Program at Long Island University.
62
The Governance and Nominating Committee concluded that Mr. Farber is qualified and should continue to serve, due, in part, to his significant experience in the generic drug industry and his ongoing role as the owner of a highly regarded and successful generic drug distributor. His skills include a thorough knowledge of the generic drug marketplace and drug supply chain management.
James M. MaherMelissa Rewolinski was appointed as a Director of the Company in June 2013. He spent his entire 37 year professional career with PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) LLP, including 27 yearsJuly 2019. Dr. Rewonliski is a National Association of Corporate Governance Fellow. Dr. Rewolinski currently serves as principal of MVR Consulting, where she specializes in providing counsel to small and mid-size biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. Earlier she held a number of senior level R&D positions for Intercept, rising to Senior Vice President, Head of Technical Operations, and member of the Executive Team. Previously, she served as Senior Director, Development for Amira Pharmaceuticals, and before that as a partner, before retiring in June 2012. Most recently, Maher servedChemical Development Group Leader and a Pharmaceutical Sciences Project Team Leader for Pfizer Global R&D. Dr. Rewolinski began her career at Pharmacia & Upjohn as the managing partner of PwC’s U.S. assurance practice, comprised of more than 1,100 partners and 12,000 staff. Previously, he served as the regional assurance leader for the metro assurance practice. During his tenure at PwC, Maher worked closely with senior management at several multinational companies, dealing extensively with significant acquisitions, divestitures, initial public offerings and secondary offerings. Mahera post-doctoral research scientist. Dr. Rewolinski earned a bachelor’sDoctorate degree in AccountingOrganic Chemistry and Bachelor of Science degree in Chemistry, magna cum laude, from LIU Post. On April 30, 2018, the Company announced that Mr. Maher will step down from the Board upon the completion of the filing of the Fiscal 2018 financial statements.
Rice University.
The Governance and Nominating Committee concluded that Mr. MaherDr. Rewolinski is well qualified and should be nominated to serve as a Director due, in part, to his extensive experience in the public accounting profession. Additionally, Mr. Maher hasher significant experience in dealing with acquisitions, divestitures, initial public offeringsoperational and secondary offerings. Mr. Maherdrug development roles within the pharmaceutical industry. Dr. Rewolinski is an independent director as defined by the rules of the NYSE.
Albert Paonessa, III was appointed as a Director of the Company in July 2015. In May 2017, Mr. Paonessa was appointed the Chief Executive Officer of KeySource Medical, a generic distributor (“KeySource”). Prior to that, Mr. Paonessa served as the President of Anda, Inc., the fourth largest distributor of generic drugs in the U.S., for over 10 years until January 2015. He previously served as Anda’s Senior Vice President of Sales and before that as Vice President of IT. Earlier, Mr. Paonessa was Vice President of Operations for VIP Pharmaceuticals, which was acquired by Anda’s parent company Andrx, in 2000. Mr. Paonessa earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Interpersonal Communications from Bowling Green State University.
The Governance and Nominating Committee concluded that Mr. Paonessa is well qualified and should be nominated to serve as a Director due, in part, to his significant experience in different executive roles within the generic pharmaceutical industry. Additionally, Mr. Paonessa has a strong operational and technical background, especially in the areas of sales, IT, planning and budgeting and business development.
Paul Taveira was appointed a Director of the Company in May 2012. Mr. Taveira has beenwas the Chief Executive Officer of the National Response Corporation, an international firm specializing in environmental services, sincefrom June 2015.2015 to February 2019. He previously served on the Board of Directors and as the Chief Executive Officer of A&D Environmental Services Inc., an environmental and industrial services company. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. Taveira was a Managing Partner of Precision Source LLC, a manufacturer of precision parts for various industries across the United States. From 1997 to 2007, Mr. Taveira held several positions at PSC Inc., a national provider of environmental services, including President, Vice President and Regional General Manager. From 1987 to 1997, Mr. Taveira held several management positions with Clean Harbors Inc., an international provider of environmental and energy services. Mr. Taveira graduated from Worcester State University with a Bachelor of Science degree in Biology.
The Governance and Nominating Committee concluded that Mr. Taveira is well qualified and should be nominated to serve as a Director due, in part, to his understanding and experience as a Chief Executive Officer and Director of various companies. Mr. Taveira is an independent director as defined by the rules of the NYSE.
John Kozlowski joined the Company in 2009 and was promoted in 2010 to Corporate Controller. In 2016, Mr. Kozlowski was promoted to Vice President Financial Operations & Corporate Controller. In October 2017, Mr. Kozlowski was promoted to Chief Operating Officer. In April 2018, Mr. Kozlowski was promoted to Chief of Staff and Strategy Officer. In August 2019, Mr. Kozlowski succeeded Martin P. Galvan CPA was appointed as the Company’s Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer in August 2011. Most recently, heOfficer. In July 2020, Mr. Kozlowski was Chief Financial Officer of CardioNet, Inc., a medical technology and service company. From 2001 to 2007, Mr. Galvan was employed by Viasys Healthcare Inc., a healthcare technology company that was acquired by Cardinal Health, Inc. in June 2007.also appointed the Principal Accounting Officer. Prior to joining the acquisition, heCompany, Mr. Kozlowski served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officerin senior finance and Director Investor Relations. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Galvan served as Chief Financial Officer of Rodel, Inc., a precision surface technologies company in the semiconductor industry. From 1979 to 1998, Mr. Galvan held several positions with Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc., a pharmaceutical company, including Vice President, Finance — The Americas; President & General Manager, RPR Mexico & Central America; Vice President, Finance, Europe/Asia Pacific;accounting roles for Optium Corporation and Chief Financial Officer, United Kingdom & Ireland. Mr. Galvan began his career with the international accounting firm Ernst & Young LLP.Finisar Australia. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in economicsfinance from RutgersJames Madison University and is a memberMasters of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.
Business Administration degree from Rider University.
John M. Abt joined the Company in March 2015 as Vice President of Quality and was promoted to Vice President and Chief Quality and Operations Officer in April 2018. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Abt held senior level positions in both quality and operations and has extensive knowledge in pharmaceutical manufacturing, quality, strategy, business improvement and site transformation. Prior to joining the Company, he most recently served as Teva Pharmaceuticals’ Vice President Global Quality Strategy, overseeing the development and implementation of strategy and associated initiatives for the global quality organization. Before that, he held a number of leadership positions of increasing responsibility in operations, continuous improvement, quality systems and compliance. He earned his Doctorate in Business Administration from Temple University, Masters of Administrative Science in Business Management from Johns Hopkins University and a Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry from Niagara University.
63
Maureen M. Cavanaugh joined the Company in May 2018 as Senior Vice President and Chief Commercial Operations Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Cavanaugh spent the past 11 years at Teva, most recently as Senior Vice President, Chief Commercial Officer, North American Generics. Earlier at Teva, Ms. Cavanaugh served as Senior Vice President and General Manager, USU.S. Generics and before that held a variety of positions in sales, marketing and customer operations. Ms. Cavanaugh also previously served as Senior Director of Marketing at PAR Pharmaceuticals, as Director, Product Management and Marketing Research at Sandoz Inc., and held a number of finance, sales and marketing operations positions at Bristol Myers-Squibb. Ms. Cavanaugh earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration degree from LaSalle University and a Masters of Business Administration degree from Rider University.
Robert Ehlinger joined the Company in July 2006 as Chief Information Officer. In June 2011, Mr. Ehlinger was promoted to Vice President of Logistics and Chief Information Officer. Prior to joining Lannett, Mr. Ehlinger was the Vice President of Information Technology at MedQuist, Inc., a healthcare services provider, where his career spanned 10 years in progressive operational and technology roles. Prior to MedQuist, Mr. Ehlinger was with Kennedy Health Systems as their Corporate Director of Information Technology supporting acute care and ambulatory care health information systems and biomedical support services. Earlier on, Mr. Ehlinger was with Dowty Communications where he held various technical and operational support roles prior to assuming the role of International Distribution Sales Executive managing the Latin America sales distribution channels. Mr. Ehlinger received a Bachelor’s of Arts degree in Physics from Gettysburg College in Gettysburg, PA.
Samuel H. Israel joined in the Company in July 2017 as General Counsel and Chief Legal Officer. Prior to joining Lannett, Mr. Israel was a partner with Fox Rothschild LLP, a national, full-service law firm, with 2226 offices that provide services in more than 60 practice areas, since 1998. He served as chair of the firm’s Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology Practice and handled a variety of commercial litigation matters. Mr. Israel earned a bachelorBachelor of scienceScience degree in chemical engineeringChemical Engineering from the University of Pennsylvania and a juris doctorJuris Doctor degree with honors from Rutgers University School of Law.
John Kozlowski joined the Company in 2009 as Corporate Controller and was promoted in 2016 to Vice President Financial Operations & Corporate Controller. In April 2018, Mr. Kozlowski was promoted to Chief of Staff and Strategy Officer. In October 2017, Mr. Kozlowski was promoted to Chief Operating Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Kozlowski served in senior finance and accounting roles for Optium Corporation and Finisar Australia. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in finance from James Madison University and a Masters of Business Administration degree from Rider University.
To the best of the Company’s knowledge, there have been no events under any bankruptcy act, no criminal proceedings and no judgments or injunctions that are material to the evaluation of the ability or integrity of any director, executive officer, or significant employee during the past ten years.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Reports
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(“Section 16”) requires the Company’s directors, executive officers and persons who own more than 10% of a registered classten percent of the Company’s equity securitiescommon stock of the Company, to file with the SEC initial reports of beneficial ownership and reports of changes in beneficial ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater-than-10% stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based solely on review of the copies of suchthese reports, furnished to the Company or written representations from these persons that no other reports were required to be filed with the SEC, the Company believes that during Fiscal 2018 all filing requirements applicablereports for the Company’s directors, executive officers and ten percent shareholders that were required to its officers, directors and greater-than-10% beneficial ownersbe filed under Section 16(a)16 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021 were timely filed, except for one Form 4 for Melissa Rewolinski reporting a single sale of the Exchange Act were complied with in14,150 shares. The transaction was subsequently reported on a timely manner.Form 4.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted the Code of Professional Conduct (the “code of ethics”), a code of ethics that applies to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as all other company personnel. The code of ethics is publicly available on our website at www.lannett.com. If the Company makes any substantive amendments to the code of ethics or grants any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the code to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or any other executive, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website or in a report on Form 8-K.
64
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee has responsibility for overseeing the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board. In addition, Audit Committee responsibilities include selection of the Company’s independent auditors, conferring with the independent auditors regarding their audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements,Consolidated Financial Statements, pre-approving and reviewing the independent auditors’ fees and considering whether non-audit services are compatible with maintaining their independence and considering the adequacy of internal financial controls. The Audit Committee operates pursuant to a written charter adopted by the Board, which is available on the Company’s website at www.lannett.com. The charter describes the nature and scope of the Audit Committee’s responsibilities. The members of the Audit Committee consist ofare Paul Taveira, David Drabik, John Chapman, and James M. Maher.Melissa Rewolinski. All members of the Audit Committee are independent directors as defined by the rules of the NYSE.
Financial Expert on Audit Committee: The Board has determined that John Chapman, and James M. Maher,a current directorDirector and Chairman of the Audit Committee, areis the Audit Committee financial expertsexpert as defined in section 3(a)(58) of the Exchange Act and the related rules of the Commission for the year ended June 30, 2018.2021.
Information Security Experience on Audit Committee: The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing management’s controls over information security. The Audit Committee meets at least quarterly with the Company’s IT management and an outside cybersecurity consulting firm, which performs an annual assessment of our cybersecurity controls, as well as the Company’s independent auditors regarding their annual audit procedures, which include information security. John Chapman has information security experience. Pursuant to the Audit Committee charter, the Audit Committee is briefed periodically on the status of the Company’s systems and processes to ensure that the Company’s electronic information is not compromised. There have not been any breaches of Company information systems in the last three years and the Company, which maintains a cyber security insurance policy, has not paid any expenses or penalties related to any information breaches.
Environmental, Social and Governance Committee
In April 2021, the Board formed an Environmental, Social and Governance (“ESG”) Committee to provide oversight of the Company’s ESG activities and evaluation of risks that may arise from these activities. The members of the ESG Committee are Timothy Crew, John Chapman, David Drabik, Melissa Rewolinski, and Paul Taveira. Timothy Crew currently serves as the Chairman of the ESG Committee.
Corporate Governance
Other information required in this Item 10 was included in the 2021 Proxy Statement, which was filed with the SEC on December 7, 2020. The sections incorporated by reference in this Item 10 include: “The Role of the Board and Risk Oversight,” “Board Leadership Structure,” “Communicating with the Board of Directors,” “Board Committees,” and “Executive Sessions of Independent Directors.”
65
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) describes our 2018Fiscal 2021 Executive Compensation Program. It provides an overview of the compensation program for the following Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) and how the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (“the Committee”) made its decisions for our 2018 fiscal year.2021 Fiscal Year.
Say on Pay Results in At our annual Although this vote is non-binding, its outcome, along with
The following pages of this CD&A highlight performance results since Fiscal A Word About Risk The Committee believes that incentive plans, along with the other elements of the Executive Compensation Program, provide appropriate rewards to our NEOs to keep them focused on our goals. The Committee also believes that the program’s structure, along with its oversight, continues to provide a setting that does not encourage the NEOs to take excessive risks in their business decisions. 66 Executive Summary Business Highlights Fiscal
In addition, we continued to make important advances in product development and mix 67 As noted above, our financial performance in Fiscal 2021 was adversely impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing competitive pressures within the generic pharmaceutical industry. Despite these challenges, our executive leadership and other employees made significant progress in executing our strategic plan and positioning the Company for future growth. The impact of these events and developments are reflected in our compensation decisions for Fiscal 2021, consistent with our pay for performance philosophy. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, salary increases for NEOs were delayed until January 2021, except for Mr. Kozlowski, whose market adjustment was effective in July 2020 as his salary remained well below 50th percentile market values. Short-term incentive (annual bonus) payouts to NEOs for Fiscal 2021 were well below target, with no awards earned for components tied to corporate financial goals (representing 70% of total target award opportunities) due to below-threshold performance results, and awards tied to individual performance and strategic objectives earned at or above target levels. Based on overall performance results, short-term incentive payouts for NEOs for Fiscal 2021 were earned at levels ranging from 30% to 40% of total target award opportunities (averaging 34% of target), well-below payouts earned for Fiscal 2020. Additionally, performance shares tied to 3-year relative TSR cycles ending in September 2020 and July 2021 were forfeited since our TSR results relative to comparator companies in the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Industry Index were below the threshold level. We believe these actions demonstrate our commitment to aligning executive pay with performance. In July 2021, our NEOs received target long-term incentive grants based on a target value mix of 30% for restricted stock, 20% for cash awards tied to changes in our absolute stock price over the three-year period ending June 30, 2024, and 50% for performance shares, with half tied to our relative TSR vs. companies in the S&P Pharmaceuticals Select Index for the three-year performance cycle running from July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024 and half to various strategic portfolio goals over the three-year measurement period ending June 30, 2024. Many outstanding stock options held by our NEOs are currently “underwater” and the value of many other outstanding equity awards are below grant date target values. Based on our interim relative TSR results through June 30, 2021, performance shares granted in Fiscal 2020 and 2021 are tracking below threshold levels which, if sustained over the applicable three-year performance periods, would result in no awards being earned by NEOs. 68 Key financial performance highlights, as reported in accordance with GAAP requirements, are shown below. GAAP-based results for Fiscal 2021 reflect asset impairments and certain other non-cash and/or non-recurring expenses that are excluded from adjusted profitability metrics. Year over year declines vs. Fiscal 2020 results reflect continued challenging market conditions within the generic pharmaceuticals industry as well as within the broader market due to the ongoing pandemic, and for comparisons vs. Fiscal 2018 and 2019 results, the non-renewal of the former distribution agreement with Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals (JSP), which expired in March 2019 and had significantly contributed to our prior net sales and profitability. See the section of our Form 10-K entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for additional details and discussion of Company performance. †Peer Group average pertains to the Fiscal 69 Comparison of
Compared with values reported in the Summary Compensation Table for Mr. Crew, current realizable values are 40% lower for Fiscal 2020 and 54% lower for Fiscal 2021. Mr. Crew’s reported compensation for Fiscal 2020 includes
70 Fiscal As our Company grows, the Committee is committed to the evolution and improvement of our Executive Compensation Program to ensure alignment with our business strategy and
|