0001111711 us-gaap:CommercialPaperMember 2018-12-31
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
| | | |
| | þ☑ | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) | |
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182019
OR
|
| | | |
| | ¨☐ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) | |
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-16189
NiSource Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
| | | |
Delaware DE | | 35-2108964 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
| | (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
| | | |
| 801 East 86th Avenue | | |
Merrillville, Indiana | IN | | 46410 |
| (Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(877) 647-5990
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
| | | | |
| Title of each class Each Class | Trading
Symbol(s) | Name of each exchangeEach Exchange on which registered | Which Registered |
| Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share | NI | New YorkNYSE |
| Depositary Shares, each representing a 1/1,000th ownership interest in a share of 6.50% Series B | NI PR B | NYSE |
| Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, liquidation preference $25,000 per share and a 1/1,000th ownership interest in a share of Series B-1 Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share, liquidation preference $0.01 per share |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes þ No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12-b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large Accelerated Filer þ Accelerated Filer ¨Emerging Growth Company ☐Non-accelerated Filer ¨Smaller Reporting Company ☐ |
| | | | |
Large accelerated filer þ
| | Accelerated filer ¨
| | Emerging growth company ¨
|
Non-accelerated filer ¨
| | Smaller reporting company ¨
| | |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨☐ No þ
The aggregate market value of the registrant's common stock, par value $0.01 per share (the "Common Stock") held by non-affiliates was approximately $9,506,346,286$10,713,311,150 based upon the June 29, 2018,28, 2019, closing price of $26.28$28.80 on the New York Stock Exchange.
There were 372,494,365382,263,348shares of Common Stock outstanding as of February 12, 2019.18, 2020.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Part III of this report incorporates by reference specific portions of the Registrant’s Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement relating to the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 7, 2019.19, 2020.
CONTENTS
|
| | |
| | | Page No. |
| |
| | |
| Item 1. | | |
| Item 1A. | | |
| Item 1B. | | |
| Item 2. | | |
| Item 3. | | |
| Item 4. | | |
| |
| | |
| Item 5. | | |
Item 6. | | |
| Item 6. | | |
| Item 7. | | |
| Item 7A. | | |
| Item 8. | | |
| Item 9. | | |
| Item 9A. | | |
| Item 9B. | | |
| | |
| Item 10. | | |
| Item 11. | | |
| Item 12. | | |
| Item 13. | | |
| Item 14. | | |
| | |
| Item 15. | | |
| |
DEFINED TERMS
The following is a list of abbreviations or acronyms that are used in this report:
|
| | |
| NiSource Subsidiaries, Affiliates and Former Subsidiaries | | |
Capital Markets (former subsidiary) | | NiSource Capital Markets, Inc. |
Columbia (former subsidiary) | | Columbia Energy Group |
| Columbia of Kentucky | | Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc. |
| Columbia of Maryland | | Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc. |
| Columbia of Massachusetts | | Bay State Gas Company |
| Columbia of Ohio | | Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. |
| Columbia of Pennsylvania | | Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. |
| Columbia of Virginia | | Columbia Gas of Virginia, Inc. |
| Company | | NiSource Inc. and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise indicated by the context |
| CPG (former subsidiary) | | Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. |
| NIPSCO | | Northern Indiana Public Service Company LLC |
| NiSource ("we," "us" or "our") | | NiSource Inc. |
| NiSource Corporate Services | | NiSource Corporate Services Company |
NiSource Finance (former subsidiary) | | NiSource Finance Corporation |
| | |
| Abbreviations | | |
| ACE | | Affordable clean energy |
| AFUDC | | Allowance for funds used during construction |
| AMR | | Automatic meter reading |
| AMRP | | Accelerated Main Replacement Program |
| AMT | | Alternative Minimum Tax |
| AOCI | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
| ASC | | Accounting Standards Codification |
| ASU | | Accounting Standards Update |
| ATM | | At-the-market |
| Board | | Board of Directors |
| BTA | | Build-transfer agreement |
CAA | | Clean Air Act |
| CAP | | Compliance Assurance Process |
| CCGT | | Combined Cycle Gas Turbine |
| CCRs | | Coal Combustion Residuals |
| CEP | | Capital Expenditure Program |
| CERCLA | | Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act (also known as Superfund) |
CO2
DPA | | Carbon dioxide |
CPP | | Clean Power PlanDeferred prosecution agreement |
| DPU | | Department of Public Utilities |
| DSIC | | Distribution System Investment Charge |
| DSM | | Demand Side Management |
| ECT | | Environmental Cost Tracker |
| EERM | | Environmental Expense Recovery Mechanism |
EGUs | | Electric Utility Steam Generating Units |
DEFINED TERMS |
| | |
| ELG | | Effluence limitations guidelinesEffluent Limitation Guidelines |
| EPA | | United States Environmental Protection Agency |
| EPS | | Earnings per share |
| FAC | | Fuel adjustment clause |
| FASB | | Financial Accounting Standards Board |
| DEFINED TERMS |
| | |
| FERC | | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission |
| FMCA | | Federally Mandated Cost Adjustment |
FTRs | | Financial Transmission Rights |
| GAAP | | Generally Accepted Accounting Principles |
| GCA | | Gas cost adjustment |
| GCR | | Gas cost recovery |
| GHG | | Greenhouse gas |
| GSEP | | Gas System Enhancement Program |
| GWh | | Gigawatt hours |
| IRIS | | Infrastructure Replacement and Improvement Surcharge |
| IRP | | Infrastructure Replacement Program |
| IRS | | Internal Revenue Service |
| IURC | | Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission |
| LDCs | | Local distribution companies |
| LIBOR | | London inter-bank offered rate |
| LIFO | | Last-in, first-out |
| MA DOR | | Massachusetts Department of Revenue |
| Massachusetts Business | | All of the assets being sold to, and liabilities being assumed by, Eversource pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement |
| MGP | | Manufactured Gas Plant |
| MISO | | Midcontinent Independent System Operator |
Mizuho | | Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd. |
| MMDth | | Million dekatherms |
| MW | | Megawatts |
| MWh | | Megawatt hours |
| NOL | | Net Operating Loss |
| NTSB | | National Transportation Safety Board |
| NYMEX | | The New York Mercantile Exchange |
| NYSE | | The New York Stock Exchange |
| OPEB | | Other Postretirement and Postemployment Benefits |
| PCB | | Polychlorinated biphenyls |
| PHMSA | | U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration |
| PISCC | | Post-in-service carrying charges |
| PPA | | Power Purchase plan agreementAgreement |
| PSC | | Public Service Commission |
| PTC | | Production Tax Credits |
| PUC | | Public Utility Commission |
| PUCO | | Public Utilities Commission of Ohio |
| RCRA | | Resource Conservation and Recovery Act |
| ROU | | Right of use |
| SAB | | Staff accounting bulletin |
| SAVE | | Steps to Advance Virginia's Energy Plan |
DEFINED TERMS |
| | |
| Separation | | The separation of our natural gas pipeline, midstream and storage business from our natural gas and electric utility business accomplished through a pro rata distribution to holders of our outstanding common stock of all the outstanding shares of common stock of CPG. The separation was completed on July 1, 2015. |
| SEC | | Securities and Exchange Commission |
| DEFINED TERMS |
| | |
| SMRP | | Safety Modification and Replacement Program |
| STRIDE | | Strategic Infrastructure Development and Enhancement |
| Sugar Creek | | Sugar Creek electric generating plant |
| TCJA | | Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 |
| TDSIC | | Transmission, Distribution and Storage System Improvement Charge |
VIEU.S. Attorney's Office | | Variable Interest EntityU.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts |
| VSCC | | Virginia State Corporation Commission |
| WCE | | Whiting Clean Energy |
Note regarding forward-looking statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements,” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Investors and prospective investors should understand that many factors govern whether any forward-looking statement contained herein will be or can be realized. Any one of those factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning our plans, strategies, objectives, expected performance, expenditures, recovery of expenditures through rates, stated on either a consolidated or segment basis, and any and all underlying assumptions and other statements that are other than statements of historical fact. All forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that management believes to be reasonable; however, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the projections, forecasts, estimates and expectations discussed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include, among other things, our debt obligations; any changes to our credit rating or the credit rating of our or certain of our subsidiaries; our ability to execute our growth strategy; changes in general economic, capital and commodity market conditions; pension funding obligations; economic regulation and the impact of regulatory rate reviews; our ability to obtain expected financial or regulatory outcomes; our ability to adapt to, and manage costs related to, advances in technology; any changes in our assumptions regarding the financial implications of the Greater Lawrence Incident; compliance with the agreements entered into with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to settle the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s investigation relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident; the pending sale of the Columbia of Massachusetts business, including the terms and closing conditions under the Asset Purchase Agreement;potential incidents and other operating risks associated with our business; our ability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage;coverage and whether such coverage will protect us against significant losses; the outcome of legal and regulatory proceedings, investigations, incidents, claims and litigation; any damage to our reputation, including in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident; compliance with applicable laws, regulations and tariffs; compliance with environmental laws and the costs of associated liabilities; fluctuations in demand from residential and commercial customers; economic conditions of certain industries; the success of NIPSCO's electric generation strategy; the price of energy commodities and related transportation costs; the reliability of customers and suppliers to fulfill their payment and contractual obligations; potential impairments of goodwill or definite-lived intangible assets; changes in taxation and accounting principles; the impact of an aging infrastructure; the impact of climate change; potential cyber-attacks; construction risks and natural gas costs and supply risks; extreme weather conditions; the attraction and retention of a qualified workforce; the ability of our subsidiaries to generate cash; uncertainties related to the expected benefits of the Separation; our ability to manage new initiatives and organizational changes; the performance of third-party suppliers and service providers; changes in the method for determining LIBOR and the potential replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate; and other matters set forth in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” of this report, many of which risks are beyond our control. In addition, the relative contributions to profitability by each business segment, and the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements relating thereto, may change over time.
All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing cautionary statements. We undertake no obligation to, and expressly disclaimsdisclaim any such obligation to, update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or changes to the future results over time or otherwise, except as required by law.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
NiSource Inc. is an energy holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 whose subsidiaries are fully regulated natural gas and electric utility companies serving approximately 4.0 million customers in seven states. NiSource is the successor to an Indiana corporation organized in 1987 under the name of NIPSCO Industries, Inc., which changed its name to NiSource on April 14, 1999.
NiSource is one of the nation’s largest natural gas distribution companies, as measured by number of customers. NiSource’s principal subsidiaries include NiSource Gas Distribution Group, Inc., a natural gas distribution holding company, and NIPSCO, a gas and electric company. NiSource derives substantially all of its revenues and earnings from the operating results of these rate-regulated businesses.
On September 13, 2018, a series of fires and explosions occurred in Lawrence, Andover and North Andover, Massachusetts related to the delivery of natural gas by Columbia of Massachusetts (referred to herein as the “Greater Lawrence Incident”). The Greater Lawrence Incident resulted in one fatality and a number of injuries, damaged multiple homes and businesses, and caused the temporary evacuation of significant portions of each municipality. The Massachusetts Governor’s Office declared a state of emergency, authorizing the Massachusetts DPU to order another utility company to coordinate the restoration of utility services in Lawrence, Andover and North Andover. The incident resulted in the interruption of gas for approximately 7,500 gas meters, the majority of which serveserved residences and approximately 700 of which approximately 700 serveserved businesses, and the interruption of other utility service more broadly in the area. Columbia of Massachusetts has replaced the cast iron and bare steel gas pipeline system in the affected area and restored service to nearly all of the gas meters. Refer to Note 18-C.6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," Note 19-C. "Legal Proceedings," and E. "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
On February 26, 2020, NiSource and Columbia of Massachusetts (together with NiSource, “Seller”) entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") with Eversource, a Massachusetts voluntary association. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement, NiSource and Columbia of Massachusetts agreed to sell to Eversource, with certain additions and exceptions: (1) substantially all of the assets of Columbia of Massachusetts and (2) all of the assets held by any of Columbia of Massachusetts’ affiliates that primarily relate to the business of storing, distributing or transporting natural gas to residential, commercial and industrial customers in Massachusetts, as conducted by Columbia of Massachusetts, and Eversource agreed to assume certain liabilities of Columbia of Massachusetts and its affiliates. The liabilities assumed by Eversource under the Asset Purchase Agreement do not include, among others, any liabilities arising out the Greater Lawrence Incident or liabilities of Columbia of Massachusetts or its affiliates pursuant to civil claims for injury of persons or damage to property to the extent such injury or damage occurs prior to the closing in connection with the Massachusetts Business. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides for a purchase price of $1,100 million in cash, subject to adjustment based on Columbia of Massachusetts’ net working capital as of the closing. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement is subject to Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and regulatory approvals, resolution of certain proceedings before governmental bodies and other conditions. For additional information, see Note 26, “Subsequent Event,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
NiSource’s reportable segments are: Gas Distribution Operations and Electric Operations. The following is a summary of the business for each reporting segment. Refer to Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and Note 22,23, "Segments of Business," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information for each segment.
Gas Distribution Operations
Our natural gas distribution operations serve approximately 3.5 million customers in seven states and operate approximately 60,000 miles of pipeline located in our service areas described below. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary NiSource Gas Distribution Group, Inc., we own six distribution subsidiaries that provide natural gas to approximately 2.62.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Kentucky, Maryland and Massachusetts. Additionally, we distribute natural gas to approximately 832,000839,000 customers in northern Indiana through our wholly-owned subsidiary NIPSCO.
Electric Operations
We generate, transmit and distribute electricity through our subsidiary NIPSCO to approximately 472,000476,000 customers in 20 counties in the northern part of Indiana and engage in wholesale and transmission transactions. NIPSCO owns and operates two coal-fired electric generating stations: four units at R.M. Schahfer located in Wheatfield, IN and one unit at Michigan City located in Michigan City, IN. The two operating facilities have a generating capacity of 2,080 MW. NIPSCO also owns and operates Sugar Creek, a CCGT plant located in West Terre Haute, IN with generating capacity of 571 MW, three gas-fired generating units located at NIPSCO’s coal-fired electric generating stations with a generating capacity of 186 MW and two hydroelectric generating plants with a generating capacity of 1610 MW: Oakdale located at Lake Freeman in Carroll County, IN and Norway located at Lake Schahfer in White County, IN. These facilities provide for a total system operating generating capacity of 2,8532,847 MW.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
In May 2018, NIPSCO completed the retirement of two coal-burning units (Units 7 and 8) at Bailly Generating Station, located in Chesterton, IN. These units had a generating capacity of approximately 460 MW. Refer to Note 18-E, "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these retirements.
NIPSCO’s transmission system, with voltages from 69,000 to 765,000 volts, consists of 2,9633,005 circuit miles. NIPSCO is interconnected with five neighboring electric utilities. During the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, NIPSCO generated 69.4%62.4% and purchased 30.6%37.6% of its electric requirements.
NIPSCO participates in the MISO transmission service and wholesale energy market. MISO is a nonprofit organization created in compliance with FERC regulations to improve the flow of electricity in the regional marketplace and to enhance electric reliability. Additionally, MISO is responsible for managing energy markets, transmission constraints and the day-ahead, real-time, FTR and ancillary markets. NIPSCO transferred functional control of its electric transmission assets to MISO, and transmission service for NIPSCO occurs under the MISO Open Access Transmission Tariff.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
Business Strategy
We focus our business strategy on our core, rate-regulated asset-based businesses with most of our operating income generated from the rate-regulated businesses. Our utilities continue to move forward on core infrastructure and environmental investment programs supported by complementary regulatory and customer initiatives across all seven states in which we operate. Our goal is to develop strategies that benefit all stakeholders as we address changing customer conservation patterns, develop more contemporary pricing structures, and embark on long-term investment programs. These strategies are intended to improve reliability and safety, enhance customer servicesservice and reduce emissions while generating sustainable returns.
In its 2018 Integrated Resource Plan submission to the IURC, NIPSCO laid out a plan to retire the R.M. Schahfer Generating Station (Units 14, 15, 17, and 18) by 2023 and Michigan City Generating Station (Unit 12) by 2028. These units represent 2,080 MW of generating capacity, equal to 72% of NIPSCO’s remaining capacity after the retirement of Bailly Units 7 and 8 in May of 2018. The current replacement plan includes renewable sources of energy, including wind, solar, and battery storage to be obtained through a combination of NIPSCO ownership and PPAs. Refer to Note 18-E,19-E, "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these plans.
Competition and Changes in the Regulatory Environment
The regulatory frameworks applicable to our operations, at both the state and federal levels, continue to evolve. These changes have had and will continue to have an impact on our operations, structure and profitability. Management continually seeks new ways to be more competitive and profitable in this environment.
The Gas Distribution Operations companies have pursued non-traditional revenue sources within the evolving natural gas marketplace. These efforts include the sale of products and services upstream of the companies’ service territory, the sale of products and services in the companies’ service territories, and gas supply cost incentive mechanisms for service to their core markets. The upstream products are made up of transactions that occur between an individual Gas Distribution Operations company and a buyer for the sales of unbundled or rebundled gas supply and capacity. The on-system services are offered by us to customers and include products such as the transportation and balancing of gas on the Gas Distribution Operations company system. The incentive mechanisms give the Gas Distribution Operations companies an opportunity to share in the savings created from such situations as gas purchase prices paid below an agreed upon benchmark and their ability to reduce pipeline capacity charges with their customers.
Increased efficiency of natural gas appliances and improvements in home building codes and standards has contributed to a long-term trend of declining average use per customer. Residential usage for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased2019 decreased primarily due to colderwarmer weather in our operating area compared to the prior year. While historically rate design at the distribution level has been structured such that a large portion of cost recovery is based upon throughput rather than in a fixed charge, operating costs are largely incurred on a fixed basis and do not fluctuate due to changes in customer usage. As a result, Gas Distribution Operations have pursued changes in rate design to more effectively match recoveries with costs incurred. Each of the states in which Gas Distribution Operations operate has different requirements regarding the procedure for establishing changes to rate design. Columbia of Ohio restructured its rate design through a base rate proceeding and has adopted a “de-coupled”decoupled rate design which more closely links the recovery of fixed costs with fixed charges. Columbia of Massachusetts received regulatory approval of a decoupling mechanism which adjusts revenues to an approved benchmark level through a volumetric adjustment factor. Columbia of Maryland and Columbia of Virginia have regulatory approval for a revenue normalization adjustment for certain customer classes, a decoupling mechanism whereby monthly revenues that exceed or fall short of approved levels are reconciled in subsequent months. In a prior base rate proceeding, Columbia of Pennsylvania implemented a pilot residential weather normalization adjustment. Columbia of Maryland, Columbia of Virginia and Columbia of Kentucky have had approval for a weather normalization adjustment
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
for many years. In a prior gas base rate proceeding, NIPSCO implemented a higher fixed customer charge for residential and small customer classes moving toward full straight fixed variable rate design.
Natural Gas Competition. Open access to natural gas supplies over interstate pipelines and the deregulation of the commodity price of gas has led to tremendous change in the energy markets. LDC customers and marketers can purchase gas directly from producers and marketers as an open, competitive market for gas supplies has emerged. This separation or “unbundling” of the transportation and other services offered by pipelines and LDCs allows customers to purchase the commodity independent of services provided by the pipelines and LDCs. The LDCs continue to purchase gas and recover the associated costs from their customers. Our Gas Distribution Operations’ subsidiaries are involved in programs that provide customers the opportunity to purchase their natural gas requirements from third parties and use our Gas Distribution Operations’ subsidiaries for transportation services.
Gas Distribution Operations competes with investor-owned, municipal, and cooperative electric utilities throughout its service areas as well as other regulated and unregulated natural gas intra and interstate pipelines and other alternate fuels, such as propane
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
and fuel oil. Gas Distribution Operations continues to be a strong competitor in the energy market as a result of strong customer preference for natural gas. Competition with providers of electricity has traditionally been the strongest in the residential and commercial markets of Kentucky, southern Ohio, central Pennsylvania and western Virginia due to comparatively low electric rates. Natural gas competes with fuel oil and propane in the Massachusetts market mainly due to the installed base of fuel oil and propane-based heating which has comprised a declining percentage of the overall market over the last few years. However, fuel oil and propane are more viable in today’s oil market.
Electric Competition. Indiana electric utilities generally have exclusive service areas under Indiana regulations, and retail electric customers in Indiana do not have the ability to choose their electric supplier. NIPSCO faces non-utility competition from other energy sources, such as self-generation by large industrial customers and other distributed energy sources.
Seasonality
A significant portion of our operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales. During the heating season, which is primarily from November through March, revenues from gas sales are more significant, and during the cooling season, which is primarily June through September, revenues from electric sales are more significant, than in other months.
Other Relevant Business InformationElectric Operations
Our customer base is broadly diversified,We generate, transmit and distribute electricity through our subsidiary NIPSCO to approximately 476,000 customers in 20 counties in the northern part of Indiana and engage in wholesale and transmission transactions. NIPSCO owns and operates two coal-fired electric generating stations: four units at R.M. Schahfer located in Wheatfield, IN and one unit at Michigan City located in Michigan City, IN. The two operating facilities have a generating capacity of 2,080 MW. NIPSCO also owns and operates Sugar Creek, a CCGT plant located in West Terre Haute, IN with no single customer accountinggenerating capacity of 571 MW, three gas-fired generating units located at NIPSCO’s coal-fired electric generating stations with a generating capacity of 186 MW and two hydroelectric generating plants with a generating capacity of 10 MW: Oakdale located at Lake Freeman in Carroll County, IN and Norway located at Lake Schahfer in White County, IN. These facilities provide for a significant portiontotal system operating generating capacity of revenues.2,847 MW.
As
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
In May 2018, NIPSCO completed the retirement of two coal-burning units (Units 7 and 8) at Bailly Generating Station, located in Chesterton, IN. These units had a generating capacity of approximately 460 MW.
NIPSCO’s transmission system, with voltages from 69,000 to 765,000 volts, consists of 3,005 circuit miles. NIPSCO is interconnected with five neighboring electric utilities. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we had 8,087 employees2019, NIPSCO generated 62.4% and purchased 37.6% of whom 3,154 were subjectits electric requirements.
NIPSCO participates in the MISO transmission service and wholesale energy market. MISO is a nonprofit organization created in compliance with FERC regulations to collective bargaining agreements. Collective bargaining agreementsimprove the flow of electricity in the regional marketplace and to enhance electric reliability. Additionally, MISO is responsible for 1,918 employees are setmanaging energy markets, transmission constraints and the day-ahead, real-time, FTR and ancillary markets. NIPSCO transferred functional control of its electric transmission assets to expire within one year.MISO, and transmission service for NIPSCO occurs under the MISO Open Access Transmission Tariff.
For a listing of certain subsidiaries of NiSource refer to Exhibit 21.Business Strategy
We electronically file various reports with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports, as well asfocus our proxy statements for the Company's annual meetings of stockholders at http://www.sec.gov. Additionally, we make all SEC filings available without charge to the publicbusiness strategy on our web site at http://www.nisource.com.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below, that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the trading pricecore, rate-regulated asset-based businesses with most of our common stock.
We have substantial indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial condition.
operating income generated from the rate-regulated businesses. Our businesses are capital intensiveutilities continue to move forward on core infrastructure and we rely significantly on long-term debt to fund a portion of our capital expendituresenvironmental investment programs supported by complementary regulatory and repay outstanding debt, and on short-term borrowings to fund a portion of day-to-day business operations. We had total consolidated indebtedness of $9,132.6 million outstanding as of December 31, 2018. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:
limit our ability to borrow additional funds or increase the cost of borrowing additional funds;
reduce the availability of cash flow from operations to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the business and the industriescustomer initiatives across all seven states in which we operate;
lead parties with whomoperate. Our goal is to develop strategies that benefit all stakeholders as we do business to require additional credit support, such as letters of credit, in order for us to transact such business;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that are less leveraged;
increase vulnerability to general adverse economicaddress changing customer conservation patterns, develop more contemporary pricing structures, and industry conditions; and
limit our ability to execute on our growth strategy, which is dependent upon access to capital to fund our substantial infrastructure investment program.
Some of our debt obligations contain financial covenants related to debt-to-capital ratios and cross-default provisions. Our failure to comply with any of these covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of outstanding debt obligations.
A drop in our credit ratings could adversely impact our cash flows, results of operation, financial condition and liquidity.
The availability and cost of credit for our businesses may be greatly affected by credit ratings. The credit rating agencies periodically review our ratings, taking into account factors such as our capital structure, earnings profile, and, in 2018, the impacts of the TCJA and the Greater Lawrence Incident. In March 2018, Moody’s affirmed our senior unsecured rating of Baa2 and our commercial paper rating of P-2, with stable outlooks. Moody’s also affirmed NIPSCO’s Baa1 rating and Columbia of Massachusetts’s Baa2 rating, with stable outlooks. In May 2018, Standard & Poor’s affirmed our BBB+ senior unsecured ratings and affirmed our commercial paper rating of A-2, but changed the outlook on each rating from stable to negative in September 2018 as a result of potential impacts of the Greater Lawrence Incident. In June 2018, Fitch affirmed our and NIPSCO's long-term issuer default ratings of BBB and upgraded the commercial paper rating to F2 from F3, with stable outlooks. A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization.
We are committed to maintaining investment grade credit ratings, however, there is no assurance we will be able to do so in the future. Our credit ratings could be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency if, in its judgment, the circumstances warrant. Any negative rating action could adversely affect our ability to access capital at rates and on terms that are attractive. A negative rating action could also adversely impact our business relationships with suppliers and operating partners, who may be less willing to extend credit or offer us similarly favorable terms as secured in the past under such circumstances.
Certain of our subsidiaries have agreements that contain “ratings triggers” that require increased collateral in the form of cash, a letter of credit or other forms of security for new and existing transactions if the credit ratings of our or certain of our subsidiaries are dropped below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for insurance purposes and for the physical purchase or sale of gas or power. As of December 31, 2018, the collateral requirement that would be required in the event of a downgrade below the ratings trigger levels would amount to approximately $53.8 million. In addition to agreements with ratings triggers, there are other agreements that contain “adequate assurance” or “material adverse change” provisions that could necessitate additional credit support such as letters of credit and cash collateral to transact business.
If our or certain of our subsidiaries credit ratings were downgraded, especially below investment grade, financing costs and the principal amount of borrowings would likely increase due to the additional risk of our debt and because certain counterparties may require additional credit support as described above. Such amounts may be material and could adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. Losing investment grade credit ratings may also result in more restrictive covenants
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
and reduced flexibility on repayment terms in debt issuances, lower share price and greater stockholder dilution from common equity issuances, in addition to reputational damage within the investment community.
We may not be able to execute our business plan or growth strategy, including utility infrastructure investments.
Business or regulatory conditions may result in us not being able to execute our business plan or growth strategy, including identified, planned and other utility infrastructure investments. Our customer and regulatory initiatives may not achieve planned results. Utility infrastructure investments may not materialize, may cease to be achievable or economically viable and may not be successfully completed. Natural gas may cease to be viewed as an economically and environmentally attractive fuel. Certain groups may continue to oppose natural gas delivery and infrastructure investments because of perceived environmental impacts associated with the natural gas supply chain and end use. Energy conservation, energy efficiency, distributed generation, energy storage, policies favoring electric heat over gas heat and other factors may reduce energy demand. Any of these developments could adversely affect our results of operations and growth prospects.
Adverse economic and market conditions or increases in interest rates could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and liquidity.
While the national economy is experiencing modest growth, we cannot predict how robust future growth will be or whether it will be sustained. Deteriorating or sluggish economic conditions in our operating jurisdictions could adversely impact our ability to maintain or grow our customer base and collect revenues from customers, which could reduce revenue growth and increase operating costs. In addition, a rising interest rate environment may lead to higher borrowing costs, which may adversely impact reported earnings, cost of capital and capital holdings. Rising interest rates and negative market or company events may also result in a decrease in the price of our shares of common stock.
We rely on access to the capital markets to finance our liquidity and long-term capital requirements, including expenditures for our utility infrastructure and to comply with future regulatory requirements, to the extent not satisfied by the cash flow generated by our operations. We have historically reliedembark on long-term debtinvestment programs. These strategies are intended to improve reliability and on the issuance of equity securities to fund a portion of our capital expendituressafety, enhance customer service and repay outstanding debt, and on short-term borrowings to fund a portion of day-to-day business operations. Successful implementation of our long-term business strategies, including capital investment, is dependent upon our ability to access the capital and credit markets, including the banking and commercial paper markets, on competitive terms and rates. An economic downturn or uncertainty, market turmoil, changes in tax policy, challenges faced by financial institutions, changes in our credit ratings, or a change in investor sentiment toward us or the utilities industry generally could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital or refinance debt. Reduced access to capital markets and/or increased borrowing costs could reduce future net income and cash flows. Refer to Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to outstanding long-term debt and maturities of that debt.
If any of these risks or uncertainties limit our access to the credit and capital markets or significantly increase our cost of capital, it could limit our ability to implement, or increase the costs of implementing, our business plan, which, in turn, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and liquidity.
Capital market performance and other factors may decrease the value of benefit plan assets, which then could require significant additional funding and impact earnings.
The performance of the capital markets affects the value of the assets that are held in trust to satisfy future obligations under defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. We have significant obligations in these areas and hold significant assets in these trusts. These assets are subject to market fluctuations and may yield uncertain returns, which fall below our projected rates of return. A decline in the market value of assets may increase the funding requirements of the obligations under the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Additionally, changes in interest rates affect the liabilities under these benefit plans; as interest rates decrease, the liabilities increase, which could potentially increase funding requirements. Further, the funding requirements of the obligations related to these benefits plans may increase due to changes in governmental regulations and participant demographics, including increased numbers of retirements or changes in life expectancy assumptions. In addition, lower asset returns result in increased expenses. Ultimately, significant funding requirements and increased pension or other postretirement benefit plan expense could negatively impact our results of operations and financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
The majority of our revenues are subject to economic regulation and are exposed to the impact of regulatory rate reviews and proceedings.
Most of our revenues are subject to economic regulation at either the federal or state level. As such, the revenues generated by us are subject to regulatory review by the applicable federal or state authority. These rate reviews determine the rates charged to customers and directly impact revenues. Our financial results are dependent on frequent regulatory proceedings in order to ensure timely recovery of costs. In addition to our ongoing regulatory proceedings, the recovery of the Greater Lawrence pipeline replacement capital investment will be addressed in a future regulatory proceeding as discussed in Note 18, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - E. Other Matters” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The outcomes of these proceedings are uncertain. Additionally, the costs of complying with current and future changes in environmental and federal pipeline safety laws and regulations are expected to be significant, and their recovery through rates will also be contingent on regulatory approval.
As a result of efforts to introduce market-based competition in certain markets where the regulated businesses conduct operations, we may compete with independent marketers for customers. This competition exposes us to the risk that certain infrastructure investments may not be recoverable and may affect results of our growth strategy and financial position.
Failure to adapt to advances in technology and manage the related costs could make us less competitive and negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
A key element of our business model is thatemissions while generating power at central station power plants achieves economies of scale and produces power at a competitive cost. We continue to research, plan for, and implement new technologies that produce power or reduce power consumption. These technologies include renewable energy, distributed generation, energy storage, and energy efficiency. Advances in technology and changes in laws or regulations are reducing the cost of these or other alternative methods of producing power to a level that is competitive with that of most central station power electric production or result in smaller-scale, more fuel efficient, and/or more cost effective distributed generation. This could cause power sales to decline and the value of our generating facilities to decline. In addition, customers are increasingly expecting enhanced communications regarding their electric and natural gas services, which, in some cases, may involve additional investments in technology. New technologies may require us to make significant expenditures to remain competitive and may result in the obsolescence of certain of our operating assets.
Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and successfully adapt to technological changes, to offer services that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards, and to recover all, or a significant portion of, any unrecovered investment in obsolete assets. A failure by us to effectively adapt to changes in technology and manage the related costs could harm our ability to remain competitive in the marketplace for our products, services and processes and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
The Greater Lawrence Incident has had and may have an additional material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
sustainable returns.
In connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident, we have incurred and will incur various costs and expenses as set forth
in Note 18 "Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings," and " - E. Other Matters" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
As more information becomes known, including information resulting from the NTSB investigation, management's estimates and assumptions regarding the costs and expenses to be incurred and the financial impact of the Greater Lawrence Incident may change. A change in management’s estimates or assumptions could result in an adjustment that would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows during the period in which such change occurred.
In addition, we are unable to predict the timing and amount of insurance recoveries. Total expenses related to the incident have exceeded the total amount of liability insurance coverage available under our policies. In addition, there may be certain types of damages, expenses or claimed costs, such as fines or penalties, that may be excluded under the policies. Losses for which we are not fully insured or that are not covered by insurance at all could materially adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
We may also incur additional costs associated with the Greater Lawrence Incident, beyond the amount currently anticipated, in connection with investigations by regulators, including the NTSB and Massachusetts DPU, as well as civil litigations. Further, state or federal legislation may be enacted that would require us to incur additional costs by mandating various changes, including changes to our operating practice standards for natural gas distribution operations and safety. If we are unable to recover the capital cost of the gas pipeline replacement in the impacted area or we incur a material amount of other costs that we are unable to recover through rates or offset through operational or other cost savings, our
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Further, if it is determined that we did not comply with applicable statutes, regulations, rules, tariffs, or orders in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident or in connection with the operations or maintenance of our natural gas system, and we are ordered to pay a material amount in customer refunds, penalties, or other amounts, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Our gas distribution activities, as well as generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, involve a variety of inherent hazards and operating risks.
Our gas distribution activities, as well as generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity, involve a variety of inherent hazards and operating risks, including, but not limited to, gas leaks and over-pressurization, downed power lines, damage to our infrastructure by third parties, outages, environmental spills, mechanical problems and other incidents, which could cause substantial financial losses, as demonstrated in part by the Greater Lawrence Incident. In addition, these hazards and risks have resulted and may in the future result in serious injury or loss of life to employees and/or the general public, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, impairment of our operations, adverse regulatory rulings and reputational harm, which in turn could lead to substantial losses for us. The location of pipeline facilities, or generation, transmission, substation and distribution facilities near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers and industrial sites, could increase the level of damages resulting from such incidents. As with the Greater Lawrence Incident, certain incidents have subjected and may in the future subject us to litigation or administrative or other legal proceedings from time to time, both civil and criminal, which could result in substantial monetary judgments, fines, or penalties against us, be resolved on unfavorable terms, and require us to incur significant operational expenses. The occurrence of incidents has in certain instances adversely affected and could in the future adversely affect our reputation, cash flows, financial position and/or results of operations. We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses.
We may be unable to obtain insurance on acceptable terms or at all, and the insurance coverage we do obtain may not provide protection against all significant losses.
Our ability to obtain insurance, as well as the cost and coverage of such insurance, are affected by developments affecting our business; international, national, state, or local events; and the financial condition of insurers. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available at all or at rates or terms acceptable to us. We expect the premiums we pay for our insurance coverage to significantly increase as a result of the Greater Lawrence Incident and market conditions. In addition, our insurance is not sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we are subject. For example, total expenses related to the Greater Lawrence Incident have exceeded the total amount of liability coverage available under our policies. Also, certain types of damages, expenses or claimed costs, such as fines and penalties, may be excluded under the policies. In addition, insurers providing liability insurance to us may raise defenses to coverage under the terms and conditions of the respective insurance policies that could result in a denial of coverage or limit the amount of insurance proceeds available to us. Any losses for which we are not fully insured or that are not covered by insurance at all could materially adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, and financial position. For more information regarding our insurance programs in the context of the Greater Lawrence Incident, see Note 18, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings," and " - E. Other Matters" in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
The outcome of legal and regulatory proceedings, investigations, inquiries, claims and litigation related to our business operations, including those related to the Greater Lawrence Incident, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
We areinvolved in legal and regulatory proceedings, investigations, inquiries, claims and litigation in connection with our business operations, including the Greater Lawrence Incident, the most significant of which are summarized in Note 18, “Other Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our insurance is not expected to cover all costs and expenses we may incur relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident and may not fully cover other incidents that may occur in the future. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the outcomes of such matters, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. If one or more of such matters were decided against us, the effects could be material to our results of operations in the period in which we would be required to record or adjust the related liability and could also be material to our cash flows in the periods that we would be required to pay such liability.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
We are exposed to significant reputational risks, which make us vulnerable to a loss of cost recovery, increased litigation and negative public perception.
As a utility company, we are subject to adverse publicity focused on the reliability of our services, the speed with which we are able to respond effectively to electric outages, natural gas leaks or events and related accidents and similar interruptions caused by storm damage or other unanticipated events, as well as our own or third parties' actions or failure to act. We are also subject to adverse publicity related to perceived environmental impacts. If customers, legislators, or regulators have or develop a negative opinion of us, this could result in less favorable legislative and regulatory outcomes or increased regulatory oversight, increased litigation and negative public perception. Recently, we have been subject to adverse publicity as a result of the Greater Lawrence Incident, and it is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of this adverse publicity. The foregoing may have continuing adverse effects on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.
Our businesses are regulated under numerous environmental laws. The cost of compliance with these laws, and changes to or additions to, or reinterpretations of the laws, could be significant. Liability from the failure to comply with existing or changed laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Our businesses are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and rules that regulate, among other things, air emissions, water usage and discharges, and waste products such as coal combustion residuals. Compliance with these legal obligations require us to make expenditures for installation of pollution control equipment, remediation, environmental monitoring, emissions fees, and permits at many of our facilities. These expenditures are significant, and we expect that they will continue to be significant in the future. Furthermore, if we fail to comply with environmental laws and regulations or are found to have caused damage to the environment or persons, even if caused by factors beyond our control, that failure or harm may result in the assessment of civil or criminal penalties and damages against us and injunctions to remedy the failure or harm.
Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised and new laws and regulations seeking to change environmental regulation of the energy industry may be adopted or become applicable to us. Revised or additional laws and regulations may result in significant additional expense and operating restrictions on our facilities or increased compliance costs, which may not be fully recoverable from customers through regulated rates and could, therefore, impact our financial position, financial results and cash flow. Moreover, such costs could materially affect the continued economic viability of one or more of our facilities.
An area of significant uncertainty and risk are the laws concerning emission of GHG. While we continue to reduce GHG emissions through priority pipeline replacement, energy efficiency, leak detection, and other programs, and expect to further reduce GHG emissions through increased use of renewable energy, GHG emissions are currently an expected aspect of the electric and natural gas business. Revised or additional future GHG legislation and/or regulation related to the generation of electricity or the extraction, production, distribution, transmission, storage and end use of natural gas could materially impact our financial position, financial results and cash flows.
Even in instances where legal and regulatory requirements are already known or anticipated, the original cost estimates for environmental capital projects, remediation of past environmental harm, or pollution reduction strategies and equipment can differ materially from the amount ultimately expended. The actual future expenditures depend on many factors, including the nature and extent of impact, the method of cleanup, the cost of raw materials, contractor costs, and the availability of cost recovery. Changes in costs and the ability to recover under regulatory mechanisms could affect our financial position, financial results and cash flows.
A significant portion of the gas and electricity we sell is used by residential and commercial customers for heating and air conditioning. Accordingly, fluctuations in weather, gas and electricity commodity costs and economic conditions impact demand of our customers and our operating results.
Energy sales are sensitive to variations in weather. Forecasts of energy sales are based on “normal” weather, which represents a long-term historical average. Significant variations from normal weather could have, and have had, a material impact on energy sales. Additionally, residential usage, and to some degree commercial usage, is sensitive to fluctuations in commodity costs for gas and electricity, whereby usage declines with increased costs, thus affecting our financial results. Lastly, residential and commercial customers’ usage is sensitive to economic conditions and factors such as unemployment, consumption and consumer confidence. Therefore, prevailing economic conditions affecting the demand of our customers may in turn affect our financial results.
Our business operations are subject to economic conditions in certain industries.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
Business operations throughout our service territories have been and may continue to be adversely affected by economic events at the national and local level where it operates. In particular, sales to large industrial customers, such as those in the steel, oil refining, industrial gas and related industries, may be impacted by economic downturns. The U.S. manufacturing industry continues to adjust to changing market conditions including international competition, increasing costs, and fluctuating demand for its products.
The implementation of NIPSCO’s electric generation strategy, including the retirement of its coal generation units, may not achieve intended results.
On October 31, 2018, NIPSCO submitted its 2018 Integrated Resource Plan withsubmission to the IURC, setting forth its short- and long-term electric generation plans in an effortNIPSCO laid out a plan to maintain affordability while providing reliable, flexible and cleaner sources of power. The plan evaluated demand-side and supply-side resource alternatives to reliably and cost-effectively meet NIPSCO customers' future energy requirements overretire the ensuing 20 years. The preferred option within the Integrated Resource Plan sets forth a schedule to retire R.M. Schahfer Generating Station (Units 14, 15, 17, and 18) by 2023 and Michigan City Generating Station (Unit 12) by 2028. These units represent 2,080 MW of generating capacity, equal to 72% of NIPSCO’s remaining capacity after the retirement of Bailly Units 7 and 8 in May of 2018. The current replacement plan includes renewable sources of energy, including wind, solar, and battery storage. However, there are inherent risksstorage to be obtained through a combination of NIPSCO ownership and uncertainties, including changes in market conditions, regulatory approvals, environmental regulations, commodity costs and customer expectations, which may impede NIPSCO’s abilityPPAs. Refer to achieve these intended results. NIPSCO’s future success will depend, in part, on its ability to successfully implement its long-term electric generation plans, to offer services that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards, and to recover all, or a significant portion of, any unrecovered investment in obsolete assets. NIPSCO’s electric generation strategy could require significant future capital expenditures, operating costs and charges to earnings that may negatively impact our financial position, financial results and cash flows.
FluctuationsNote 19-E, "Other Matters," in the priceNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of energy commodities or their related transportation costs or an inability to obtain an adequate, reliablethese plans.
Competition and cost-effective fuel supply to meet customer demands may have a negative impact on our financial results.Changes in the Regulatory Environment
Our electric generating fleet is dependent on coal and natural gas for fuel, and our gas distribution operations purchase and resell much of the natural gas we deliverThe regulatory frameworks applicable to our customers.operations, at both the state and federal levels, continue to evolve. These energy commodities are vulnerable to price fluctuations and fluctuations in associated transportation costs. From time to time, wechanges have also used hedging in order to offset fluctuations in commodity supply prices. We rely on regulatory recovery mechanisms in the various jurisdictions in order to fully recover the commodity costs incurred in providing service. However, while we have historically been successful in the recovery of costs related to such commodity prices, there can be no assurance that such costs will be fully recovered through rates in a timely manner.
In addition, we depend on electric transmission lines, natural gas pipelines, and other transportation facilities owned and operated by third parties to deliver the electricity and natural gas we sell to wholesale markets, supply natural gas to our gas storage and electric generation facilities, and provide retail energy services to customers. If transportation is disrupted, or if capacity is inadequate, we may be unable to sell and deliver our gas and electricservices to some or all of our customers. As a result, we may be required to procure additional or alternative electricity and/or natural gas supplies at then-current market rates, which, if recovery of related costs is disallowed, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and/or prospects.
We are exposed to risk that customers will not remit payment for delivered energy or services, and that suppliers or counterparties will not perform under various financial or operating agreements.
Our extension of credit is governed by a Corporate Credit Risk Policy, involves considerable judgment and is based on an evaluation of a customer or counterparty’s financial condition, credit history and other factors. We monitor our credit risk exposureby obtaining credit reports and updated financial information for customers and suppliers, and by evaluating the financial status of our banking partners and other counterparties by reference to market-based metrics such as credit default swap pricing levels, and to traditional credit ratings provided by the major credit rating agencies. Adverse economic conditions could result in an increase in defaults by customers, suppliers and counterparties.
We have significant goodwill and definite-lived intangible assets. An impairment of goodwill or definite-lived intangible assets could result in a significant charge to earnings and negatively impact our compliance with certain covenants under financing agreements.
In accordance with GAAP, we test goodwill for impairment at least annually and review our definite-lived intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Goodwill also is tested for impairment when factors, examples of which include reduced cash flow estimates, a sustained decline in stock price or market capitalization below book value, indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We have testedhad and will continue to monitorhave an impact on our operations, structure and profitability. Management continually seeks new ways to be more competitive and profitable in this environment.
The Gas Distribution Operations companies have pursued non-traditional revenue sources within the goodwillevolving natural gas marketplace. These efforts include the sale of products and services upstream of the companies’ service territory, the sale of products and services in the companies’ service territories, and gas supply cost incentive mechanisms for service to their core markets. The upstream products are made up of transactions that occur between an individual Gas Distribution Operations company and a buyer for the sales of unbundled or rebundled gas supply and capacity. The on-system services are offered by us to customers and include products such as the transportation and balancing of gas on the Gas Distribution Operations company system. The incentive mechanisms give the Gas Distribution Operations companies an opportunity to share in the savings created from such situations as gas purchase prices paid below an agreed upon benchmark and their ability to reduce pipeline capacity charges with their customers.
Increased efficiency of natural gas appliances and improvements in home building codes and standards has contributed to a long-term trend of declining average use per customer. Residential usage for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased primarily due to warmer weather in our operating area compared to the prior year. While historically rate design at the distribution level has been structured such that a large portion of cost recovery is based upon throughput rather than in a fixed charge, operating costs are largely incurred on a fixed basis and do not fluctuate due to changes in customer usage. As a result, Gas Distribution Operations have pursued changes in rate design to more effectively match recoveries with costs incurred. Each of the states in which Gas Distribution Operations operate has different requirements regarding the procedure for establishing changes to rate design. Columbia of Ohio restructured its rate design through a base rate proceeding and has adopted a decoupled rate design which more closely links the recovery of fixed costs with fixed charges. Columbia of Massachusetts received regulatory approval of a decoupling mechanism which adjusts revenues to an approved benchmark level through a volumetric adjustment factor. Columbia of Maryland and Columbia of Virginia have regulatory approval for impairmenta revenue normalization adjustment for certain customer classes, a decoupling mechanism whereby monthly revenues that exceed or fall short of approved levels are reconciled in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident. To date,subsequent months. In a prior base rate proceeding, Columbia of Pennsylvania implemented a pilot residential weather normalization adjustment. Columbia of Maryland, Columbia of Virginia and Columbia of Kentucky have had approval for a weather normalization adjustment
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
these tests do not indicatefor many years. In a prior gas base rate proceeding, NIPSCO implemented a higher fixed customer charge for residential and small customer classes moving toward full straight fixed variable rate design.
Natural Gas Competition. Open access to natural gas supplies over interstate pipelines and the need for an impairmentderegulation of the goodwill balance. We would be requiredcommodity price of gas has led to record a chargetremendous change in our financial statementsthe energy markets. LDC customers and marketers can purchase gas directly from producers and marketers as an open, competitive market for the period in which any impairmentgas supplies has emerged. This separation or “unbundling” of the goodwill or definite-lived intangible assets is determined, negatively impactingtransportation and other services offered by pipelines and LDCs allows customers to purchase the resultscommodity independent of operations. A significant charge could impact the capitalization ratio covenant under certain financing agreements. We are subject to a financial covenant under our five-year revolving credit facility, which requires us to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio that does not exceed 70%. A similar covenant in a 2005 private placement note purchase agreement requires us to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio that does not exceed 75%. As of December 31, 2018, the ratio was 61.4%.
Changes in taxation and the ability to quantify such changes could adversely affect our financial results.
We are subject to taxationservices provided by the various taxing authorities atpipelines and LDCs. The LDCs continue to purchase gas and recover the federal, state and local levels where we do business. Legislation or regulation which could affect our tax burden could be enacted by any of these governmental authorities. For example,associated costs from their customers. Our Gas Distribution Operations’ subsidiaries are involved in programs that provide customers the TCJA includes numerous provisions that affect businesses, including changesopportunity to U.S. corporate tax rates, business-related exclusions, and deductions and credits. The outcome of regulatory proceedings regarding the extent to which the effect of reduced corporate tax rate will be shared with customers and the time period over which it will be shared could significantly impact future earnings and cash flows. Separately, a challenge by a taxing authority, our ability to utilize tax benefits such as carryforwards or tax credits, or a deviation from other tax-related assumptions may cause actual financial results to deviate from previous estimates.
Changes in accounting principles may adversely affect our financial results.
Future changes in accounting rules and associated changes in regulatory accounting may negatively impact the way we record revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. These changes in accounting standards may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Aging infrastructure may lead to disruptions in operations and increased capital expenditures and maintenance costs, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
We have risks associated with aging infrastructure assets. The age of these assets may result in a need for replacement, a higher level of maintenance costs, or unscheduled outages, despite efforts by us to properly maintain or upgrade these assets through inspection, scheduled maintenance and capital investment. In addition, the nature of the information available on aging infrastructure assets may make inspections, maintenance, upgrading and replacement of the assets particularly challenging. The failure to operate these assets as desired could result in gas leaks and other incidents and in our inability to meet firm service obligations, which could adversely impact revenues, and could also result in increased capital expenditures and maintenance costs, which, if not fully recovered from customers, could negatively impact our financial results.
The impacts of climate change, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, accidents or other catastrophic events may disrupt operations and reduce the ability to service customers.
A disruption or failure ofpurchase their natural gas distribution systems, or within electric generation, transmission or distribution systems, in the event of a major hurricane, tornado, terrorist attack, accident or other catastrophic event could cause delays in completing sales, providing services, or performing other critical functions. We have experienced disruptions in the past from hurricanes and tornadoes and other events of this nature. The occurrence of such events could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. In accordance with customary industry practice, we maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses. There is also a concern that climate change may exacerbate the risks to physical infrastructure. Such risks include heat stresses to power lines, storms that damage infrastructure, lake and sea level changes that damage the manner in which services are currently provided, droughts or other stresses on water used to supply services, and other extreme weather conditions. Climate change and the costs that may be associated with its impacts have the potential to affect our business in many ways, including increasing the costs we incur in providing our products and services, impacting the demand for and consumption of our products and services (due to change in both costs and weather patterns), and affecting the economic health of the regions in which we operate.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
A cyber-attack on any of our or certain third-party computer systems upon which we rely may adversely affect our ability to operate.
We are reliant on technology to run our business, which is dependent upon financial and operational computer systems to process critical information necessary to conduct various elements of our business, including the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, operation of our gas pipeline facilities and the recording and reporting of commercial and financial transactions to regulators, investors and other stakeholders. In addition to general information and cyber risks that all large corporations face (e.g., malware, unauthorized access attempts, phishing attacks, malicious intent by insiders and inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information), the utility industry faces evolving cybersecurity risks associated with protecting sensitive and confidential customer information, electric grid infrastructure, and natural gas infrastructure. Deployment of new business technologies represents a new and large-scale opportunity for attacks on our information systems and confidential customer information, as well as on the integrity of the energy grid and the natural gas infrastructure. Increasing large-scale corporate attacks in conjunction with more sophisticated threats continue to challenge power and utility companies. Any failure of our computer systems, or those of our customers, suppliers or others with whom we do business, could materially disrupt our ability to operate our business and could result in a financial loss and possibly do harm to our reputation.
Additionally, our information systems experience ongoing, often sophisticated, cyber-attacks by a variety of sources, including foreign sources, with the apparent aim to breach our cyber-defenses. Although we attempt to maintain adequate defenses to these attacks and work through industry groups and trade associations to identify common threats and assess our countermeasures, a security breach of our information systems could (i) impact the reliability of our generation, transmission and distribution systems and potentially negatively impact our compliance with certain mandatory reliability standards, (ii) subject us to reputational and other harm associated with theft or inappropriate release of certain types of information such as system operating information or information, personal or otherwise, relating to our customers or employees, (iii) impact our ability to manage our businesses, and/or (iv) subject us to legal and regulatory proceedings and claimsrequirements from third parties in addition to remediation costs, any of which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect onand use our businesses, cash flows, financial condition, results of operations and/or prospects.
Our capital projects and programs subject us to construction risks and natural gas costs and supply risks, and require numerous permits, approvals and certificates from various governmental agencies.
Our business requires substantial capital expendituresGas Distribution Operations’ subsidiaries for investments in, among other things, capital improvements to our electric generating facilities, electric and natural gas distribution infrastructure, natural gas storage, and other projects, including projects for environmental compliance. We are engaged in intrastate natural gas pipeline modernization programs to maintain system integrity and enhance service reliability and flexibility. NIPSCO also is currently engaged in a number of capital projects, including environmental improvements to its electric generating stations, the construction of new transmission facilities, and new projects related to renewable energy. As we undertake these projects and programs, we may be unable to complete them on schedule or at the anticipated costs. Additionally, we may construct or purchase some of these projects and programs to capture anticipated future growth in natural gas production, which may not materialize, and may cause the construction to occur over an extended period of time.
Our existing and planned capital projects require numerous permits, approvals and certificates from federal, state, and local governmental agencies. If there is a delay in obtaining any required regulatory approvals or if we fail to obtain or maintain any required approvals or to comply with any applicable laws or regulations, we may not be able to construct or operate our facilities, we may be forced to incur additional costs, or we may be unable to recover any or all amounts invested in a project. We also may not receive the anticipated increases in revenue and cash flows resulting from such projects and programs until after their completion
To the extent that delays occur, costs become unrecoverable, or we otherwise become unable to effectively manage and complete our capital projects, our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Sustained extreme weather conditions may negatively impact our operations.
We conduct our operations across a wide geographic area subject to varied and potentially extreme weather conditions, which may from time to time persist for sustained periods of time. Despite preventative maintenance efforts, persistent weather related stress on our infrastructure may reveal weaknesses in our systems not previously known to us or otherwise present various operational challenges across all business segments. Further, adverse weather may affect our ability to conduct operations in a manner that satisfies customer expectations or contractual obligations, including by causing service disruptions.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce could harm our results of operations.
We operate in an industry that requires many of our employees to possess unique technical skill sets. Events such as an aging workforce without appropriate replacements, the mismatch of skill sets to future needs, or the unavailability of contract resources may lead to operating challenges or increased costs. These operating challenges include lack of resources, loss of knowledge, and a lengthy time period associated with skill development. In addition, current and prospective employees may determine that they do not wish to work for us due to market, economic, employment and other conditions. Failure to hire and retain qualified employees, including the ability to transfer significant internal historical knowledge and expertise to the new employees, may adversely affect our ability to manage and operate our business. If we are unable to successfully attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, safety, service reliability, customer satisfaction and our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Some of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Our collective bargaining agreements are generally negotiated on an operating company basis. Any failure to reach an agreement on new labor contracts or to negotiate these labor contracts might result in strikes, boycotts or other labor disruptions. Labor disruptions, strikes or significant negotiated wage and benefit increases, whether due to union activities, employee turnover or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations and/or cash flows.
We are a holding company and are dependent on cash generated by our subsidiaries to meet our debt obligations and pay dividends on our stock.
We are a holding company and conduct our operations primarily through our subsidiaries. Substantially all of our consolidated assets are held by our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our ability to meet our debt obligations or pay dividends on our common stock and preferred stock is largely dependent upon cash generated by these subsidiaries. In the event a major subsidiary is not able to pay dividends or transfer cash flows to us, our ability to service our debt obligations or pay dividends could be negatively affected.
The Separation may result in significant tax liabilities.
The Separation, which was completed in July 2015, was conditioned on the receipt by us of a legal opinion to the effect that the distribution of CPG shares to our stockholders is expected to qualify as tax-free under Section 355 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the "Internal Revenue Code"). Even though we have received such an opinion, the IRS could determine on audit that the distribution is taxable. Both us and our stockholders could incur significant U.S. Federal income tax liabilities if taxing authorities conclude the distribution is taxable.
If we cannot effectively manage new initiatives and organizational changes, we will be unable to address the opportunities and challenges presented by our strategy and the business and regulatory environment.
In order to execute on our sustainable growth strategy and enhance our culture of ongoing continuous improvement, we must effectively manage the complexity and frequency of new initiatives and organizational changes. If we are unable to make decisions quickly, assess our opportunities and risks, and implement new governance, managerial and organizational processes as needed to execute our strategy in this increasingly dynamic and competitive business and regulatory environment, our financial condition, results of operations and relationships with our business partners, regulators, customers and stockholders may be negatively impacted.
We outsource certain business functions to third-party suppliers and service providers, and substandard performance by those third parties could harm our business, reputation and results of operations.
Utilities rely on extensive networks of business partners and suppliers to support critical enterprise capabilities across their organizations. Global metrics indicate that deliveries from suppliers are slowing and that labor shortages are occurring in the energy sector. We outsource certain services to third parties in areas including construction services, information technology, materials, fleet, environmental, operational services and other areas. Outsourcing of services to third parties could expose us to inferior service quality or substandard deliverables, which may result in non-compliance (including with applicable legal requirements and industry standards), interruption of service or accidents, or reputational harm, which could negatively impact our results of operations. If any difficulties in the operations of these third-party suppliers and service providers, including their systems, were to occur, they could adversely affect our results of operations, or adversely affect our ability to work with regulators, unions, customers or employees.
Changes in the method for determining LIBOR and the potential replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
Some of our indebtedness, including borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, bears interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR. From time to time, we also enter into hedging instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate. In addition, these hedging instruments, as well as hedging instruments that our subsidiaries use for hedging natural gas price and basis risk, rely on LIBOR-based rates to calculate interest accrued on certain payments that may be required to be made under these agreements, such as late payments or interest accrued if any cash collateral should be held by a counterparty. In July 2017, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that the FCA intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. In the United States, efforts to identify a set of alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rates include proposals by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee has proposed the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") as its recommended alternative to LIBOR, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR rates in April 2018. SOFR is intended to be a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight that is collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities.
Any changes announced by the FCA, other regulators or any other successor governance or oversight body, or future changes adopted by such body, in the method pursuant to which the LIBOR rates are determined may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in the reported LIBOR rates. If that were to occur, the level of interest payments we incur may change. In addition, although certain of our LIBOR based obligations provide for alternative methods of calculating the interest rate payable on certain of our obligations if LIBOR is not reported, which include, without limitation, requesting certain rates from major reference banks in London or New York, uncertainty as to the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher than, lower than or that do not otherwise correlate over time with, the interest rates or payments that would have been made on our obligations if a LIBOR-based rate was available in its current form.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
NISOURCE INC.
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Discussed below are the principal properties held by us and our subsidiaries as of December 31, 2018.
transportation services.
Gas Distribution Operations
Refer to Item 1, "Business - Gas Distribution Operations" of this report for further information on competes with investor-owned, municipal, and cooperative electric utilities throughout its service areas as well as other regulated and unregulated natural gas intra and interstate pipelines and other alternate fuels, such as propane and fuel oil. Gas Distribution Operations properties.continues to be a strong competitor in the energy market as a result of strong customer preference for natural gas. Competition with providers of electricity has traditionally been the strongest in the residential and commercial markets of Kentucky, southern Ohio, central Pennsylvania and western Virginia due to comparatively low electric rates. Natural gas competes with fuel oil and propane in the Massachusetts market mainly due to the installed base of fuel oil and propane-based heating which has comprised a declining percentage of the overall market over the last few years. However, fuel oil and propane are more viable in today’s oil market.
Electric Competition. Indiana electric utilities generally have exclusive service areas under Indiana regulations, and retail electric customers in Indiana do not have the ability to choose their electric supplier. NIPSCO faces non-utility competition from other energy sources, such as self-generation by large industrial customers and other distributed energy sources.
Seasonality
A significant portion of our operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales. During the heating season, which is primarily from November through March, revenues from gas sales are more significant, and during the cooling season, which is primarily June through September, revenues from electric sales are more significant, than in other months.
Electric Operations
We generate, transmit and distribute electricity through our subsidiary NIPSCO to approximately 476,000 customers in 20 counties in the northern part of Indiana and engage in wholesale and transmission transactions. NIPSCO owns and operates two coal-fired electric generating stations: four units at R.M. Schahfer located in Wheatfield, IN and one unit at Michigan City located in Michigan City, IN. The two operating facilities have a generating capacity of 2,080 MW. NIPSCO also owns and operates Sugar Creek, a CCGT plant located in West Terre Haute, IN with generating capacity of 571 MW, three gas-fired generating units located at NIPSCO’s coal-fired electric generating stations with a generating capacity of 186 MW and two hydroelectric generating plants with a generating capacity of 10 MW: Oakdale located at Lake Freeman in Carroll County, IN and Norway located at Lake Schahfer in White County, IN. These facilities provide for a total system operating generating capacity of 2,847 MW.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
In May 2018, NIPSCO completed the retirement of two coal-burning units (Units 7 and 8) at Bailly Generating Station, located in Chesterton, IN. These units had a generating capacity of approximately 460 MW.
NIPSCO’s transmission system, with voltages from 69,000 to 765,000 volts, consists of 3,005 circuit miles. NIPSCO is interconnected with five neighboring electric utilities. During the year ended December 31, 2019, NIPSCO generated 62.4% and purchased 37.6% of its electric requirements.
NIPSCO participates in the MISO transmission service and wholesale energy market. MISO is a nonprofit organization created in compliance with FERC regulations to improve the flow of electricity in the regional marketplace and to enhance electric reliability. Additionally, MISO is responsible for managing energy markets, transmission constraints and the day-ahead, real-time, FTR and ancillary markets. NIPSCO transferred functional control of its electric transmission assets to MISO, and transmission service for NIPSCO occurs under the MISO Open Access Transmission Tariff.
Business Strategy
We focus our business strategy on our core, rate-regulated asset-based businesses with most of our operating income generated from the rate-regulated businesses. Our utilities continue to move forward on core infrastructure and environmental investment programs supported by complementary regulatory and customer initiatives across all seven states in which we operate. Our goal is to develop strategies that benefit all stakeholders as we address changing customer conservation patterns, develop more contemporary pricing structures, and embark on long-term investment programs. These strategies are intended to improve reliability and safety, enhance customer service and reduce emissions while generating sustainable returns.
In its 2018 Integrated Resource Plan submission to the IURC, NIPSCO laid out a plan to retire the R.M. Schahfer Generating Station (Units 14, 15, 17, and 18) by 2023 and Michigan City Generating Station (Unit 12) by 2028. These units represent 2,080 MW of generating capacity, equal to 72% of NIPSCO’s remaining capacity after the retirement of Bailly Units 7 and 8 in May of 2018. The current replacement plan includes renewable sources of energy, including wind, solar, and battery storage to be obtained through a combination of NIPSCO ownership and PPAs. Refer to Note 19-E, "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of these plans.
Competition and Changes in the Regulatory Environment
The regulatory frameworks applicable to our operations, at both the state and federal levels, continue to evolve. These changes have had and will continue to have an impact on our operations, structure and profitability. Management continually seeks new ways to be more competitive and profitable in this environment.
The Gas Distribution Operations companies have pursued non-traditional revenue sources within the evolving natural gas marketplace. These efforts include the sale of products and services upstream of the companies’ service territory, the sale of products and services in the companies’ service territories, and gas supply cost incentive mechanisms for service to their core markets. The upstream products are made up of transactions that occur between an individual Gas Distribution Operations company and a buyer for the sales of unbundled or rebundled gas supply and capacity. The on-system services are offered by us to customers and include products such as the transportation and balancing of gas on the Gas Distribution Operations company system. The incentive mechanisms give the Gas Distribution Operations companies an opportunity to share in the savings created from such situations as gas purchase prices paid below an agreed upon benchmark and their ability to reduce pipeline capacity charges with their customers.
Increased efficiency of natural gas appliances and improvements in home building codes and standards has contributed to a long-term trend of declining average use per customer. Residential usage for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased primarily due to warmer weather in our operating area compared to the prior year. While historically rate design at the distribution level has been structured such that a large portion of cost recovery is based upon throughput rather than in a fixed charge, operating costs are largely incurred on a fixed basis and do not fluctuate due to changes in customer usage. As a result, Gas Distribution Operations have pursued changes in rate design to more effectively match recoveries with costs incurred. Each of the states in which Gas Distribution Operations operate has different requirements regarding the procedure for establishing changes to rate design. Columbia of Ohio restructured its rate design through a base rate proceeding and has adopted a decoupled rate design which more closely links the recovery of fixed costs with fixed charges. Columbia of Massachusetts received regulatory approval of a decoupling mechanism which adjusts revenues to an approved benchmark level through a volumetric adjustment factor. Columbia of Maryland and Columbia of Virginia have regulatory approval for a revenue normalization adjustment for certain customer classes, a decoupling mechanism whereby monthly revenues that exceed or fall short of approved levels are reconciled in subsequent months. In a prior base rate proceeding, Columbia of Pennsylvania implemented a pilot residential weather normalization adjustment. Columbia of Maryland, Columbia of Virginia and Columbia of Kentucky have had approval for a weather normalization adjustment
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
NISOURCE INC.
for many years. In a prior gas base rate proceeding, NIPSCO implemented a higher fixed customer charge for residential and small customer classes moving toward full straight fixed variable rate design.
Natural Gas Competition. Open access to natural gas supplies over interstate pipelines and the deregulation of the commodity price of gas has led to tremendous change in the energy markets. LDC customers and marketers can purchase gas directly from producers and marketers as an open, competitive market for gas supplies has emerged. This separation or “unbundling” of the transportation and other services offered by pipelines and LDCs allows customers to purchase the commodity independent of services provided by the pipelines and LDCs. The LDCs continue to purchase gas and recover the associated costs from their customers. Our Gas Distribution Operations’ subsidiaries are involved in programs that provide customers the opportunity to purchase their natural gas requirements from third parties and use our Gas Distribution Operations’ subsidiaries for transportation services.
Gas Distribution Operations competes with investor-owned, municipal, and cooperative electric utilities throughout its service areas as well as other regulated and unregulated natural gas intra and interstate pipelines and other alternate fuels, such as propane and fuel oil. Gas Distribution Operations continues to be a strong competitor in the energy market as a result of strong customer preference for natural gas. Competition with providers of electricity has traditionally been the strongest in the residential and commercial markets of Kentucky, southern Ohio, central Pennsylvania and western Virginia due to comparatively low electric rates. Natural gas competes with fuel oil and propane in the Massachusetts market mainly due to the installed base of fuel oil and propane-based heating which has comprised a declining percentage of the overall market over the last few years. However, fuel oil and propane are more viable in today’s oil market.
Electric Competition. Indiana electric utilities generally have exclusive service areas under Indiana regulations, and retail electric customers in Indiana do not have the ability to choose their electric supplier. NIPSCO faces non-utility competition from other energy sources, such as self-generation by large industrial customers and other distributed energy sources.
Seasonality
A significant portion of our operations are subject to seasonal fluctuations in sales. During the heating season, which is primarily from November through March, revenues from gas sales are more significant, and during the cooling season, which is primarily June through September, revenues from electric sales are more significant, than in other months.
Other Relevant Business Information
Our customer base is broadly diversified, with no single customer accounting for a significant portion of revenues.
As of December 31, 2019, we had 8,363 employees of whom 3,219 were subject to collective bargaining agreements. Collective bargaining agreements for 96 employees are set to expire within one year.
For a listing of certain subsidiaries of NiSource refer to Exhibit 21.
We electronically file various reports with the SEC, including annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to such reports, as well as our proxy statements for the Company's annual meetings of stockholders at http://www.sec.gov. Additionally, we make all SEC filings available without charge to the public on our web site at http://www.nisource.com.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
Our operations and financial results are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below, that could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and the trading price of our common stock.
We have substantial indebtedness which could adversely affect our financial condition.
Our business is capital intensive and we rely significantly on long-term debt to fund a portion of our capital expenditures and repay outstanding debt, and on short-term borrowings to fund a portion of day-to-day business operations. We had total consolidated indebtedness of $9,642.8 million outstanding as of December 31, 2019. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences. For example, it could:
limit our ability to borrow additional funds or increase the cost of borrowing additional funds;
reduce the availability of cash flow from operations to fund working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the business and the industries in which we operate;
lead parties with whom we do business to require additional credit support, such as letters of credit, in order for us to transact such business;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to competitors that are less leveraged;
increase vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions; and
limit our ability to execute on our growth strategy, which is dependent upon access to capital to fund our substantial infrastructure investment program.
Some of our debt obligations contain financial covenants related to debt-to-capital ratios and cross-default provisions. Our failure to comply with any of these covenants could result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of outstanding debt obligations.
A drop in our credit ratings could adversely impact our cash flows, results of operation, financial condition and liquidity.
The availability and cost of credit for our businesses may be greatly affected by credit ratings. The credit rating agencies periodically review our ratings, taking into account factors such as our capital structure, earnings profile, and, in 2018 and 2019, the impacts of the TCJA and the Greater Lawrence Incident. We are committed to maintaining investment grade credit ratings; however, there is no assurance we will be able to do so in the future. Our credit ratings could be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency if, in its judgment, the circumstances warrant. Any negative rating action could adversely affect our ability to access capital at rates and on terms that are attractive. A negative rating action could also adversely impact our business relationships with suppliers and operating partners, who may be less willing to extend credit or offer us similarly favorable terms as secured in the past under such circumstances.
Certain of our subsidiaries have agreements that contain “ratings triggers” that require increased collateral in the form of cash, a letter of credit or other forms of security for new and existing transactions if the credit ratings of our or certain of our subsidiaries are dropped below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for insurance purposes and for the physical purchase or sale of gas or power. As of December 31, 2019, the collateral requirement that would be required in the event of a downgrade below the ratings trigger levels would amount to approximately $72.1 million. In addition to agreements with ratings triggers, there are other agreements that contain “adequate assurance” or “material adverse change” provisions that could necessitate additional credit support such as letters of credit and cash collateral to transact business.
If our or certain of our subsidiaries' credit ratings were downgraded, especially below investment grade, financing costs and the principal amount of borrowings would likely increase due to the additional risk of our debt and because certain counterparties may require additional credit support as described above. Such amounts may be material and could adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. Losing investment grade credit ratings may also result in more restrictive covenants and reduced flexibility on repayment terms in debt issuances, lower share price and greater stockholder dilution from common equity issuances, in addition to reputational damage within the investment community.
We may not be able to execute our business plan or growth strategy, including utility infrastructure investments.
Business or regulatory conditions may result in us not being able to execute our business plan or growth strategy, including identified, planned and other utility infrastructure investments. Our customer and regulatory initiatives may not achieve planned
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
results. Utility infrastructure investments may not materialize, may cease to be achievable or economically viable and may not be successfully completed. Natural gas may cease to be viewed as an economically and environmentally attractive fuel. Certain groups and governmental entities may continue to oppose natural gas delivery and infrastructure investments because of perceived environmental impacts associated with the natural gas supply chain and end use. Energy conservation, energy efficiency, distributed generation, energy storage, policies favoring electric heat over gas heat and other factors may reduce demand for natural gas and energy. Any of these developments could adversely affect our results of operations and growth prospects. Even if our business plan and growth strategy are executed, there is still risk of, among other things, human error in maintenance, installation or operations, shortages or delays in obtaining equipment, and performance below expected levels (in addition to the other risks discussed in this section).
Adverse economic and market conditions or increases in interest rates could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and liquidity.
While the national economy is experiencing modest growth, we cannot predict how robust future growth will be or whether it will be sustained. Deteriorating or sluggish economic conditions in our operating jurisdictions could adversely impact our ability to maintain or grow our customer base and collect revenues from customers, which could reduce revenue growth and increase operating costs. In addition, a rising interest rate environment may lead to higher borrowing costs, which may adversely impact reported earnings, cost of capital and capital holdings. Rising interest rates and negative market or company events may also result in a decrease in the price of our shares of common stock.
We rely on access to the capital markets to finance our liquidity and long-term capital requirements, including expenditures for our utility infrastructure and to comply with future regulatory requirements, to the extent not satisfied by the cash flow generated by our operations. We have historically relied on long-term debt and on the issuance of equity securities to fund a portion of our capital expenditures and repay outstanding debt, and on short-term borrowings to fund a portion of day-to-day business operations. Successful implementation of our long-term business strategies, including capital investment, is dependent upon our ability to access the capital and credit markets, including the banking and commercial paper markets, on competitive terms and rates. An economic downturn or uncertainty, market turmoil, changes in tax policy, challenges faced by financial institutions, changes in our credit ratings, or a change in investor sentiment toward us or the utilities industry generally could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital or refinance debt. Reduced access to capital markets and/or increased borrowing costs could reduce future net income and cash flows. Refer to Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to outstanding long-term debt and maturities of that debt.
If any of these risks or uncertainties limit our access to the credit and capital markets or significantly increase our cost of capital, it could limit our ability to implement, or increase the costs of implementing, our business plan, which, in turn, could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, financial condition and liquidity.
Capital market performance and other factors may decrease the value of benefit plan assets, which then could require significant additional funding and impact earnings.
The performance of the capital markets affects the value of the assets that are held in trust to satisfy future obligations under defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. We have significant obligations in these areas and hold significant assets in these trusts as noted in Note 11, "Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These assets are subject to market fluctuations and may yield uncertain returns, which fall below our projected rates of return. A decline in the market value of assets may increase the funding requirements of the obligations under the defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans. Additionally, changes in interest rates affect the liabilities under these benefit plans; as interest rates decrease, the liabilities increase, which could potentially increase funding requirements. Further, the funding requirements of the obligations related to these benefits plans may increase due to changes in governmental regulations and participant demographics, including increased numbers of retirements or changes in life expectancy assumptions. In addition, lower asset returns result in increased expenses. Ultimately, significant funding requirements and increased pension or other postretirement benefit plan expense could negatively impact our results of operations and financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
The majority of our revenues are subject to economic regulation and are exposed to the impact of regulatory rate reviews and proceedings.
Most of our revenues are subject to economic regulation at either the federal or state level. As such, the revenues generated by us are subject to regulatory review by the applicable federal or state authority. These rate reviews determine the rates charged to customers and directly impact revenues. Our financial results are dependent on frequent regulatory proceedings in order to ensure timely recovery of costs and investments. In addition to our ongoing regulatory proceedings, the recovery of the Greater Lawrence pipeline replacement capital investment will be addressed in a future regulatory proceeding as discussed in Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - E. Other Matters” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The outcomes of these proceedings are uncertain, potentially lengthy and could be influenced by many factors, some of which may be outside of our control, including the cost of providing service, the necessity of expenditures, the quality of service, regulatory interpretations, customer intervention, economic conditions and the political environment. Further, the rate orders are subject to appeal, which creates additional uncertainty as to the rates that will ultimately be allowed to be charged for services. Additionally, the costs of complying with current and future changes in environmental and federal pipeline safety laws and regulations are expected to be significant, and their recovery through rates will also be contingent on regulatory approval.
Failure to adapt to advances in technology and manage the related costs could make us less competitive and negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.
A key element of our business model is that generating power at central station power plants achieves economies of scale and produces power at a competitive cost. We continue to research, plan for, and implement new technologies that produce power or reduce power consumption. These technologies include renewable energy, distributed generation, energy storage, and energy efficiency. Advances in technology and changes in laws or regulations (including subsidization) are reducing the cost of these or other alternative methods of producing power to a level that is competitive with that of most central station power electric production or result in smaller-scale, more fuel efficient, and/or more cost-effective distributed generation. This could cause power sales to decline and the value of our generating facilities to decline. New technologies may require us to make significant expenditures to remain competitive and may result in the obsolescence of certain operating assets.
In addition, customers are increasingly expecting enhanced communications regarding their electric and natural gas services, which, in some cases, may involve additional investments in technology. We also rely on technology to adequately maintain key business records.
Our future success will depend, in part, on our ability to anticipate and successfully adapt to technological changes, to offer services that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards, and to recover all, or a significant portion of, any unrecovered investment in obsolete assets. A failure by us to effectively adapt to changes in technology and manage the related costs could harm our ability to remain competitive in the marketplace for our products, services and processes and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
The Greater Lawrence Incident has materially adversely affected and may continue to materially adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident, we have incurred and will incur various costs and expenses as set forth in Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings," and “- E. Other Matters" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We are subject to inquiries and investigations by government authorities and regulatory agencies regarding the Greater Lawrence Incident, including the Massachusetts DPU and the Massachusetts Attorney General's Office. We are cooperating with all inquiries and investigations. In addition, on February 26, 2020, the Company and Columbia of Massachusetts entered into agreements with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to resolve the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s investigation relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident, as described further below.
As more information becomes known, management's estimates and assumptions regarding the costs and expenses to be incurred and the financial impact of the Greater Lawrence Incident may change. A change in management’s estimates or assumptions could result in an adjustment that would have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows during the period in which such change occurred.
While we have recovered the full amount of our liability insurance coverage available under our policies, total expenses related to the incident have exceeded such amount. Expenses in excess of our liability insurance coverage have materially adversely affected and may continue to materially adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial position.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
We may also incur additional costs associated with the Greater Lawrence Incident, beyond the amount currently anticipated, including in connection with investigations by regulators as well as civil litigation. Further, state or federal legislation may be enacted that would require us to incur additional costs by mandating various changes, including changes to our operating practice standards for natural gas distribution operations and safety. If we are unable to recover the capital cost of the gas pipeline replacement in the impacted area or we incur a material amount of other costs that we are unable to recover through rates or offset through operational or other cost savings, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Further, if it is determined in other matters that we did not comply with applicable statutes, regulations, rules, tariffs, or orders in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident or in connection with the operations or maintenance of our natural gas system, and we are ordered to pay additional amounts in customer refunds, penalties, or other amounts, our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.
Our settlement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in respect of federal charges in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident may expose us to further penalties, liabilities and private litigation, and may impact our operations.
On February 26, 2020, the Company entered into a DPA and Columbia of Massachusetts entered into a plea agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to resolve the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s investigation relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident. Columbia of Massachusetts’ plea agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office is subject to approval by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (the "Court"). If Columbia of Massachusetts’ guilty plea is not accepted by the Court or is withdrawn for any reason, the U.S. Attorney's Office may, at its sole option, render the DPA null and void. See Note 19, “Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The agreements impose various compliance and remedial obligations on the Company and Columbia of Massachusetts. Failure to comply with the terms of these agreements could result in further enforcement action by the U.S. Attorney’s Office, expose the Company and Columbia of Massachusetts to penalties, financial or otherwise, and subjects the Company to further private litigation, each of which could impact our operations and have a material adverse effect on our business.
The closing of the sale of the Massachusetts Business is subject to receipt of clearance and approval from various governmental entities and other closing conditions that may not be satisfied or waived, and, in order to receive such clearance, consent or approval, governmental entities may impose conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions that Eversource is not obligated to accept in order to complete the transaction.
On February 26, 2020, NiSource, Columbia of Massachusetts and Eversource entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement providing for the sale of the Massachusetts Business to Eversource. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides for various closing conditions, including (a) the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, (b) the receipt of the approval of the Massachusetts DPU (the “MDPU Approval”) and (c) the final resolution or termination of all pending actions, claims and proceedings against Seller and its affiliates under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts DPU and all future, actions, claims and proceedings against Seller and its affiliates relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident under the jurisdiction of the Massachusetts DPU.
The satisfaction of many of the closing conditions is beyond our control. We may not receive the required clearance and approvals for the transaction or the required resolution with the Massachusetts DPU, or we may not receive them in a timely manner. In addition, governmental entities could impose conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions as conditions for their approvals and as conditions to resolve certain proceedings, and these may include substantial payments by us. Moreover, Eversource is not required to agree to any conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions to obtain required clearance and approvals if such conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions would reasonably be expected to constitute a “burdensome condition” as defined in the Asset Purchase Agreement. There can be no assurance that regulators will not seek to impose conditions, terms, obligations or restrictions that would constitute burdensome conditions.
If the closing conditions are not satisfied or there is a substantial delay in obtaining the required clearance and approvals, or otherwise satisfying the closing conditions, the sale of the Massachusetts Business may not be completed, and we may lose some or all of the intended benefits of the sale.
The sale of the Massachusetts Business poses risks and challenges that could negatively impact our business, and we may not realize the expected benefits of the sale of the Massachusetts Business.
The sale of the Massachusetts Business involves separation or carve-out activities and costs and possible disputes with Eversource. Following the sale, we may have continued financial liabilities with respect to the business conducted by Columbia of Massachusetts,
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
as we will be required to retain responsibility for, and indemnify Eversource against, certain liabilities, including liabilities for any fines arising out of the Greater Lawrence Incident and liabilities of Columbia of Massachusetts or its affiliates pursuant to civil claims for injury of persons or damage to property to the extent such injury or damage occurs prior to the closing in connection with Columbia of Massachusetts’ business. It may also be difficult to determine whether a claim from a third party is our responsibility, and we may expend substantial resources trying to determine whether we or Eversource has responsibility for the claim.
If we do not realize the expected benefits of the sale of the Massachusetts Business, our consolidated financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be negatively impacted. The sale of the Massachusetts Business may result in a dilutive impact to our future earnings if we are unable to offset the dilutive impact from the loss of revenue associated with the sale, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The failure to complete the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement within the expected time frame or at all could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and the price of our common stock.
If the sale of the Massachusetts Business is not completed by October 26, 2020 (subject to up to two automatic 45-day extensions under certain circumstances related to obtaining required regulatory approvals and resolution with the Massachusetts DPU), we or Eversource may choose not to proceed with the transaction. Completion of the transaction is subject to risks, including the risks that approval of the transaction by governmental entities will not be obtained or that certain other closing conditions will not be satisfied. A failure to complete the transaction may result in negative publicity and a negative impression of us in the investment community. Moreover, under the terms of the settlement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, we will be obligated to use reasonable best efforts to sell Columbia of Massachusetts’ business, and there is no assurance that we will be able to sell such business to a third party on as favorable terms, if at all. The occurrence of any of these events, individually or in combination, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or the trading price of our common stock.
Our gas distribution activities, as well as generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, involve a variety of inherent hazards and operating risks, including potential public safety risks.
Our gas distribution activities, as well as generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity, involve a variety of inherent hazards and operating risks, including, but not limited to, gas leaks and over-pressurization, downed power lines, damage to our infrastructure by third parties, outages, environmental spills, mechanical problems and other incidents, which could cause substantial financial losses, as demonstrated in part by the Greater Lawrence Incident. In addition, these hazards and risks have resulted and may in the future result in serious injury or loss of life to employees and/or the general public, significant damage to property, environmental pollution, impairment of our operations, adverse regulatory rulings and reputational harm, which in turn could lead to substantial losses for us. The location of pipeline facilities, or generation, transmission, substation and distribution facilities near populated areas, including residential areas, commercial business centers and industrial sites, could increase the level of damages resulting from such incidents. As with the Greater Lawrence Incident, certain incidents have subjected and may in the future subject us to litigation or administrative or other legal proceedings from time to time, both civil and criminal, which could result in substantial monetary judgments, fines, or penalties against us, be resolved on unfavorable terms, and require us to incur significant operational expenses. The occurrence of incidents has in certain instances adversely affected and could in the future adversely affect our reputation, cash flows, financial position and/or results of operations. We maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses.
We may be unable to obtain insurance on acceptable terms or at all. Our liability insurance coverage did not provide protection against all significant losses as a result of the Greater Lawrence Incident and may not provide protection against all significant losses in the future.
Our ability to obtain insurance, as well as the cost and coverage of such insurance, are affected by developments affecting our business; international, national, state, or local events; and the financial condition of insurers. The insurance market is experiencing a hardening environment due to reductions in commercial suppliers and the capacity they are willing to issue, increases in overall demand for capacity, and a prevalence of severe losses. NiSource has been particularly affected by the current market conditions. We have not been able to obtain liability insurance coverage at previously procured limits at rates that are acceptable to us. Insurance coverage may not continue to be available at limits, rates or terms acceptable to us. The premiums we pay for our insurance coverage have significantly increased as a result of market conditions and the accumulated loss ratio over the history of NiSource operations, and we expect that they will continue to increase as a result of market conditions. In addition, our insurance is not sufficient or effective under all circumstances and against all hazards or liabilities to which we are subject. For example, total expenses related to the Greater Lawrence Incident have exceeded the total amount of liability coverage available under our policies.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
Also, certain types of damages, expenses or claimed costs, such as fines and penalties, may be excluded under the policies. In addition, insurers providing insurance to us may raise defenses to coverage under the terms and conditions of the respective insurance policies that could result in a denial of coverage or limit the amount of insurance proceeds available to us. Any losses for which we are not fully insured or that are not covered by insurance at all could materially adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows, and financial position. For example, expenses related to the Greater Lawrence Incident that we are unable to recover from liability or property insurance have materially adversely affected and may continue to materially adversely affect our results of operations. For more information regarding our insurance programs in the context of the Greater Lawrence Incident, see Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings," and " - E. Other Matters" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The outcome of legal and regulatory proceedings, investigations, inquiries, claims and litigation related to our business operations, including those related to the Greater Lawrence Incident, may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity.
We areinvolved in legal and regulatory proceedings, investigations, inquiries, claims and litigation in connection with our business operations, including the Greater Lawrence Incident, the most significant of which are summarized in Note 19, “Other Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Our insurance does not cover all costs and expenses that we have incurred and that we may incur in the future relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident, and may not fully cover other incidents that may occur in the future. Due to the inherent uncertainty of the outcomes of such matters, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular claim or proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position or liquidity. Certain matters in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident have had or may have a material impact as described in Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. If one or more of such additional or other matters were decided against us, the effects could be material to our results of operations in the period in which we would be required to record or adjust the related liability and could also be material to our cash flows in the periods that we would be required to pay such liability.
We are exposed to significant reputational risks, which make us vulnerable to a loss of cost recovery, increased litigation and negative public perception.
As a utility company, we are subject to adverse publicity focused on the reliability of our services, the speed with which we are able to respond effectively to electric outages, natural gas leaks or events and related accidents and similar interruptions caused by storm damage or other unanticipated events, as well as our own or third parties' actions or failure to act. We are also subject to adverse publicity related to actual or perceived environmental impacts. If customers, legislators, or regulators have or develop a negative opinion of us, this could result in less favorable legislative and regulatory outcomes or increased regulatory oversight, increased litigation and negative public perception. The adverse publicity and investigations we experienced as a result of the Greater Lawrence Incident may have an ongoing negative impact on the public’s perception of us. It is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of this adverse publicity. The foregoing may have continuing adverse effects on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.
Our businesses are subject to various laws, regulations and tariffs. We could be materially adversely affected if we fail to comply with such laws, regulations and tariffs or with any changes in or new interpretations of such laws, regulations and tariffs.
Our businesses are subject to various laws, regulations and tariffs, including, but not limited to, those relating to natural gas pipeline safety, employee safety, the environment and our energy infrastructure. Existing laws, regulations and tariffs may be revised or become subject to new interpretations, and new laws, regulations and tariffs may be adopted or become applicable to us and our operations. In some cases, compliance with new laws, regulations and tariffs increases our costs. If we fail to comply with laws, regulations and tariffs applicable to us or with any changes in or new interpretations of such laws, regulations or tariffs, our financial condition, results of operations, regulatory outcomes and cash flows may be materially adversely affected.
Our businesses are regulated under numerous environmental laws. The cost of compliance with these laws, and changes to or additions to, or reinterpretations of the laws, could be significant. Liability from the failure to comply with existing or changed laws could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Our businesses are subject to extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and rules that regulate, among other things, air emissions, water usage and discharges, GHG and waste products such as coal combustion residuals. Compliance with these legal obligations require us to make expenditures for installation of pollution control equipment, remediation, environmental monitoring, emissions fees, and permits at many of our facilities. These expenditures are significant, and we expect that they will continue to
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
be significant in the future. Furthermore, if we fail to comply with environmental laws and regulations or are found to have caused damage to the environment or persons, that failure or harm may result in the assessment of civil or criminal penalties and damages against us and injunctions to remedy the failure or harm.
Existing environmental laws and regulations may be revised and new laws and regulations seeking to change environmental regulation of the energy industry may be adopted or become applicable to us, with an increased focus on both coal and natural gas in recent years. Revised or additional laws and regulations may result in significant additional expense and operating restrictions on our facilities or increased compliance costs, which may not be fully recoverable from customers through regulated rates and could, therefore, impact our financial position, financial results and cash flow. Moreover, such costs could materially affect the continued economic viability of one or more of our facilities.
An area of significant uncertainty and risk are the laws concerning emission of GHG. While we continue to reduce GHG emissions through the retirement of coal-fired electric generation, priority pipeline replacement, energy efficiency, leak detection and repair, and other programs, and expect to further reduce GHG emissions through increased use of renewable energy, GHG emissions are currently an expected aspect of the electric and natural gas business. Revised or additional future GHG legislation and/or regulation related to the generation of electricity or the extraction, production, distribution, transmission, storage and end use of natural gas could materially impact our gas supply, financial position, financial results and cash flows.
Even in instances where legal and regulatory requirements are already known or anticipated, the original cost estimates for environmental improvements, remediation of past environmental impact, or pollution reduction strategies and equipment can differ materially from the amount ultimately expended. The actual future expenditures depend on many factors, including the nature and extent of impact, the method of improvement, the cost of raw materials, contractor costs, and requirements established by environmental authorities. Changes in costs and the ability to recover under regulatory mechanisms could affect our financial position, financial results and cash flows.
A significant portion of the gas and electricity we sell is used by residential and commercial customers for heating and air conditioning. Accordingly, fluctuations in weather, gas and electricity commodity costs and economic conditions impact demand of our customers and our operating results.
Energy sales are sensitive to variations in weather. Forecasts of energy sales are based on “normal” weather, which represents a long-term historical average. Significant variations from normal weather could have, and have had, a material impact on energy sales. Additionally, residential usage, and to some degree commercial usage, is sensitive to fluctuations in commodity costs for gas and electricity, whereby usage declines with increased costs, thus affecting our financial results. Lastly, residential and commercial customers’ usage is sensitive to economic conditions and factors such as unemployment, consumption and consumer confidence. Therefore, prevailing economic conditions affecting the demand of our customers may in turn affect our financial results.
Our business operations are subject to economic conditions in certain industries.
Business operations throughout our service territories have been and may continue to be adversely affected by economic events at the national and local level where it operates. In particular, sales to large industrial customers, such as those in the steel, oil refining, industrial gas and related industries, may be impacted by economic downturns and geographic or technological shifts in production or production methods. The U.S. manufacturing industry continues to adjust to changing market conditions including international competition, increasing costs, and fluctuating demand for its products.
The implementation of NIPSCO’s electric generation strategy, including the retirement of its coal generation units, may not achieve intended results.
On October 31, 2018, NIPSCO submitted its 2018 Integrated Resource Plan with the IURC setting forth its short- and long-term electric generation plans in an effort to maintain affordability while providing reliable, flexible and cleaner sources of power. The plan evaluated demand-side and supply-side resource alternatives to reliably and cost-effectively meet NIPSCO customers' future energy requirements over the ensuing 20 years. The preferred option within the Integrated Resource Plan sets forth a schedule to retire R.M. Schahfer Generating Station (Units 14, 15, 17, and 18) in 2023 and Michigan City Generating Station (Unit 12) in 2028. The current replacement plan includes renewable sources of energy, including wind, solar, and battery storage.
As part of this plan, NIPSCO has IURC approval for the Jordan Creek PPA for 400 MW, the Indiana Crossroads BTA for 300 MW and the Rosewater BTA for 100 MW. Each is a separate facility and all MW are nameplate capacity. NIPSCO has filed a notice with the IURC of its intention not to move forward with one of its approved PPAs due to the failure to meet a condition precedent in the agreement as a result of local zoning restrictions.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
There are inherent risks and uncertainties in executing the Integrated Resource Plan, including changes in market conditions, regulatory approvals, environmental regulations, commodity costs and customer expectations, which may impede NIPSCO’s ability to achieve the intended results. NIPSCO’s future success will depend, in part, on its ability to successfully implement its long-term electric generation plans, to offer services that meet customer demands and evolving industry standards, and to recover all, or a significant portion of, any unrecovered investment in obsolete assets. NIPSCO’s electric generation strategy could require significant future capital expenditures, operating costs and charges to earnings that may negatively impact our financial position, financial results and cash flows.
Fluctuations in the price of energy commodities or their related transportation costs or an inability to obtain an adequate, reliable and cost-effective fuel supply to meet customer demands may have a negative impact on our financial results.
Our electric generating fleet is dependent on coal and natural gas for fuel, and our gas distribution operations purchase and resell much of the natural gas we deliver to our customers. These energy commodities are vulnerable to price fluctuations and fluctuations in associated transportation costs. From time to time, we have also used hedging in order to offset fluctuations in commodity supply prices. We rely on regulatory recovery mechanisms in the various jurisdictions in order to fully recover the commodity costs incurred in providing service. However, while we have historically been successful in the recovery of costs related to such commodity prices, there can be no assurance that such costs will be fully recovered through rates in a timely manner.
In addition, we depend on electric transmission lines, natural gas pipelines, and other transportation facilities owned and operated by third parties to deliver the electricity and natural gas we sell to wholesale markets, supply natural gas to our gas storage and electric generation facilities, and provide retail energy services to customers. If transportation is disrupted, or if capacity is inadequate, we may be unable to sell and deliver our gas and electricservices to some or all of our customers. As a result, we may be required to procure additional or alternative electricity and/or natural gas supplies at then-current market rates, which, if recovery of related costs is disallowed, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, financial condition, cash flows, results of operations and/or prospects.
We are exposed to risk that customers will not remit payment for delivered energy or services, and that suppliers or counterparties will not perform under various financial or operating agreements.
Our extension of credit is governed by a Corporate Credit Risk Policy, involves considerable judgment by our employees and is based on an evaluation of a customer or counterparty’s financial condition, credit history and other factors. We monitor our credit risk exposureby obtaining credit reports and updated financial information for customers and suppliers, and by evaluating the financial status of our banking partners and other counterparties by reference to market-based metrics such as credit default swap pricing levels, and to traditional credit ratings provided by the major credit rating agencies. Adverse economic conditions could result in an increase in defaults by customers, suppliers and counterparties.
We have significant goodwill and definite-lived intangible assets. Impairments of goodwill and definite-lived intangible assets related to Columbia of Massachusetts have resulted in significant charges to earnings for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2019. Any future impairments of other goodwill could result in a significant charge to earnings in a future period and negatively impact our compliance with certain covenants under financing agreements.
In accordance with GAAP, we test goodwill for impairment at least annually and review our definite-lived intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate its fair value might be below its carrying value. Goodwill is also tested for impairment when factors, examples of which include reduced cash flow estimates, a sustained decline in stock price or market capitalization below book value, indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.
We are required to record a charge in our financial statements for a period in which any impairment of our goodwill or definite-lived intangible assets is determined, negatively impacting our results of operations. In connection with the preparation of our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, we conducted an impairment analysis for the goodwill and definite-lived intangible assets (franchise rights) related to Columbia of Massachusetts and concluded that such goodwill and franchise rights were impaired. As a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $204.8 million for such goodwill and an impairment charge of $209.7 million for such franchise rights at December 31, 2019. For additional information, see Note 6, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
A significant charge in the future could impact the capitalization ratio covenant under certain financing agreements. We are subject to a financial covenant under our revolving credit facility and term loan agreement, which require us to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio that does not exceed 70%. A similar covenant in a 2005 private placement note purchase agreement requires us to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio that does not exceed 75%. As of December 31, 2019, the ratio was 61.7%.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
Changes in taxation and the ability to quantify such changes as well as challenges to tax positions could adversely affect our financial results.
We are subject to taxation by the various taxing authorities at the federal, state and local levels where we do business. Legislation or regulation which could affect our tax burden could be enacted by any of these governmental authorities. For example, the TCJA includes numerous provisions that affect businesses, including changes to U.S. corporate tax rates, business-related exclusions, and deductions and credits. The outcome of regulatory proceedings regarding the extent to which the effect of a change in corporate tax rate will impact customers and the time period over which the impact will occur could significantly impact future earnings and cash flows. Separately, a challenge by a taxing authority, changes in taxing authorities’ administrative interpretations, decisions, policies and positions, our ability to utilize tax benefits such as carryforwards or tax credits, or a deviation from other tax-related assumptions may cause actual financial results to deviate from previous estimates.
Changes in accounting principles may adversely affect our financial results.
Future changes in accounting rules and associated changes in regulatory accounting may negatively impact the way we record revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities. These changes in accounting standards may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Aging infrastructure may lead to disruptions in operations and increased capital expenditures and maintenance costs, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
We have risks associated with aging infrastructure, including our gas infrastructure assets. These risks can be driven by threats such as, but not limited to, internal corrosion, external corrosion and stress corrosion cracking. The age of these assets may result in a need for replacement, a higher level of maintenance costs, or unscheduled outages, despite efforts by us to properly maintain or upgrade these assets through inspection, scheduled maintenance and capital investment. In addition, the nature of the information available on aging infrastructure assets, which in some cases is incomplete, may make inspections, maintenance, upgrading and replacement of the assets particularly challenging. Additionally, missing or incorrect infrastructure data may lead to (1) difficulty properly locating facilities, which can result in excavator damage and operational or emergency response issues, and (2) configuration and control risks associated with the modification of system operating pressures in connection with turning off or turning on service to customers, which can result in unintended outages or operating pressures. Also, additional maintenance and inspections are required in some instances in order to improve infrastructure information and records and address emerging regulatory or risk management requirements, which increases our costs. The failure to operate these assets as desired could result in gas leaks and other incidents and in our inability to meet firm service obligations, which could adversely impact revenues, and could also result in increased capital expenditures and maintenance costs, which, if not fully recovered from customers, could negatively impact our financial results.
The impacts of climate change, natural disasters, acts of terrorism, accidents or other catastrophic events may disrupt operations and reduce the ability to service customers.
A disruption or failure of natural gas distribution systems, or within electric generation, transmission or distribution systems, in the event of a major hurricane, tornado, terrorist attack, cyber-attack (as further detailed below), accident or other catastrophic event could cause delays in completing sales, providing services, or performing other critical functions. We have experienced disruptions in the past from hurricanes and tornadoes and other events of this nature. The occurrence of such events could adversely affect our financial position and results of operations. In accordance with customary industry practice, we maintain insurance against some, but not all, of these risks and losses. There is also a concern that climate change may exacerbate the risks to physical infrastructure. Such risks include heat stresses to power lines, storms that damage infrastructure, lake and sea level changes that affect the manner in which services are currently provided, droughts or other stresses on water used to supply services, and other extreme weather conditions. Climate change and the costs that may be associated with its impacts have the potential to affect our business in many ways, including increasing the costs we incur in providing our products and services, impacting the demand for and consumption of our products and services (due to change in both costs and weather patterns), and affecting the economic health of the regions in which we operate.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
A cyber-attack on any of our or certain third-party computer systems upon which we rely may adversely affect our ability to operate and could lead to a loss or misuse of confidential and proprietary information or potential liability.
We are reliant on technology to run our business, which is dependent upon financial and operational computer systems to process critical information necessary to conduct various elements of our business, including the generation, transmission and distribution of electricity, operation of our gas pipeline facilities and the recording and reporting of commercial and financial transactions to regulators, investors and other stakeholders. In addition to general information and cyber risks that all large corporations face (e.g., malware, unauthorized access attempts, phishing attacks, malicious intent by insiders and inadvertent disclosure of sensitive information), the utility industry faces evolving and increasingly complex cybersecurity risks associated with protecting sensitive and confidential customer information, electric grid infrastructure, and natural gas infrastructure. Deployment of new business technologies represents a new and large-scale opportunity for attacks on our information systems and confidential customer information, as well as on the integrity of the energy grid and the natural gas infrastructure. Increasing large-scale corporate attacks in conjunction with more sophisticated threats continue to challenge power and utility companies. Any failure of our computer systems, or those of our customers, suppliers or others with whom we do business, could materially disrupt our ability to operate our business and could result in a financial loss and possibly do harm to our reputation.
Additionally, our information systems experience ongoing, often sophisticated, cyber-attacks by a variety of sources, including foreign sources, with the apparent aim to breach our cyber-defenses. Although we attempt to maintain adequate defenses to these attacks and work through industry groups and trade associations to identify common threats and assess our countermeasures, a security breach of our information systems, or a security breach of the information systems of our customers, suppliers or others with whom we do business, could (i) impact the reliability of our generation, transmission and distribution systems and potentially negatively impact our compliance with certain mandatory reliability standards, (ii) subject us to reputational and other harm or liabilities associated with theft or inappropriate release of certain types of information such as system operating information or information, personal or otherwise, relating to our customers or employees, (iii) impact our ability to manage our businesses, and/or (iv) subject us to legal and regulatory proceedings and claims from third parties, in addition to remediation costs, any of which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, cash flows, financial condition, results of operations and/or prospects. Although we do maintain cyber insurance, it is possible that such insurance will not adequately cover any losses or liabilities we may incur as a result of any cybersecurity-related litigation.
Our capital projects and programs subject us to construction risks and natural gas costs and supply risks, and require numerous permits, approvals and certificates from various governmental agencies.
Our business requires substantial capital expenditures for investments in, among other things, capital improvements to our electric generating facilities, electric and natural gas distribution infrastructure, natural gas storage, and other projects, including projects for environmental compliance. We are engaged in intrastate natural gas pipeline modernization programs to maintain system integrity and enhance service reliability and flexibility. NIPSCO also is currently engaged in a number of capital projects, including environmental improvements to its electric generating stations, the construction of new transmission facilities, and new projects related to renewable energy. As we undertake these projects and programs, we may be unable to complete them on schedule or at the anticipated costs. Additionally, we may construct or purchase some of these projects and programs to capture anticipated future growth in natural gas production, which may not materialize, and may cause the construction to occur over an extended period of time.
Our existing and planned capital projects require numerous permits, approvals and certificates from federal, state, and local governmental agencies. If there is a delay in obtaining any required regulatory approvals or if we fail to obtain or maintain any required approvals or to comply with any applicable laws or regulations, we may not be able to construct or operate our facilities, we may be forced to incur additional costs, or we may be unable to recover any or all amounts invested in a project. We also may not receive the anticipated increases in revenue and cash flows resulting from such projects and programs until after their completion. Other construction risks include changes in costs of materials, equipment, commodities or labor (including changes to tariffs on materials), delays caused by construction incidents or injuries, work stoppages, shortages in qualified labor, poor initial cost estimates, unforeseen engineering issues, the ability to obtain necessary rights-of-way, easements and transmissions connections and general contractors and subcontractors not performing as required under their contracts.
To the extent that delays occur, costs become unrecoverable, or we otherwise become unable to effectively manage and complete our capital projects, our results of operations, cash flows, and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Sustained extreme weather conditions may negatively impact our operations.
We conduct our operations across a wide geographic area subject to varied and potentially extreme weather conditions, which may from time to time persist for sustained periods of time. Despite preventative maintenance efforts, persistent weather related stress
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
on our infrastructure may reveal weaknesses in our systems not previously known to us or otherwise present various operational challenges across all business segments. Further, adverse weather may affect our ability to conduct operations in a manner that satisfies customer expectations or contractual obligations, including by causing service disruptions.
Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, and maintain good labor relations, could harm our results of operations.
We operate in an industry that requires many of our employees to possess unique technical skill sets. Events such as an aging workforce without appropriate replacements, the mismatch of skill sets to future needs, or the unavailability of contract resources may lead to operating challenges or increased costs. These operating challenges include lack of resources, loss of knowledge, and a lengthy time period associated with skill development. In addition, current and prospective employees may determine that they do not wish to work for us due to market, economic, employment and other conditions. Failure to hire and retain qualified employees, including the ability to transfer significant internal historical knowledge and expertise to the new employees, may adversely affect our ability to manage and operate our business. If we are unable to successfully attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, safety, service reliability, customer satisfaction and our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Some of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Our collective bargaining agreements are generally negotiated on an operating company basis. Any failure to reach an agreement on new labor contracts or to negotiate these labor contracts might result in strikes, boycotts or other labor disruptions. Labor disruptions, strikes or significant negotiated wage and benefit increases, whether due to union activities, employee turnover or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our businesses, results of operations and/or cash flows.
We are a holding company and are dependent on cash generated by our subsidiaries to meet our debt obligations and pay dividends on our stock.
We are a holding company and conduct our operations primarily through our subsidiaries, which are separate and distinct legal entities. Substantially all of our consolidated assets are held by our subsidiaries. Accordingly, our ability to meet our debt obligations or pay dividends on our common stock and preferred stock is largely dependent upon cash generated by these subsidiaries. In the event a major subsidiary is not able to pay dividends or transfer cash flows to us, our ability to service our debt obligations or pay dividends could be negatively affected.
If we cannot effectively manage new initiatives and organizational changes, we will be unable to address the opportunities and challenges presented by our strategy and the business and regulatory environment.
In order to execute on our sustainable growth strategy and enhance our culture of ongoing continuous improvement, we must effectively manage the complexity and frequency of new initiatives and organizational changes. If we are unable to make decisions quickly, assess our opportunities and risks, and implement new governance, managerial and organizational processes as needed to execute our strategy in this increasingly dynamic and competitive business and regulatory environment, our financial condition, results of operations and relationships with our business partners, regulators, customers and stockholders may be negatively impacted.
We outsource certain business functions to third-party suppliers and service providers, and substandard performance by those third parties could harm our business, reputation and results of operations.
Utilities rely on extensive networks of business partners and suppliers to support critical enterprise capabilities across their organizations. Global metrics indicate that deliveries from suppliers are slowing and that labor shortages are occurring in the energy sector. We outsource certain services to third parties in areas including construction services, information technology, materials, fleet, environmental, operational services and other areas. Outsourcing of services to third parties could expose us to inferior service quality or substandard deliverables, which may result in non-compliance (including with applicable legal requirements and industry standards), interruption of service or accidents, or reputational harm, which could negatively impact our results of operations. If any difficulties in the operations of these third-party suppliers and service providers, including their systems, were to occur, they could adversely affect our results of operations, or adversely affect our ability to work with regulators, unions, customers or employees.
Changes in the method for determining LIBOR and the potential replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Some of our indebtedness, including borrowings under our revolving credit agreement and term loan agreement, bears interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR. From time to time, we also enter into hedging instruments to manage our exposure to fluctuations in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate. In addition, these hedging instruments, as well as hedging instruments that our subsidiaries
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
NISOURCE INC.
use for hedging natural gas price and basis risk, rely on LIBOR-based rates to calculate interest accrued on certain payments that may be required to be made under these agreements, such as late payments or interest accrued if any cash collateral should be held by a counterparty. Any changes announced by regulators in the method pursuant to which the LIBOR rates are determined may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in the reported LIBOR rates. If that were to occur, the level of interest payments we incur may change.
In July 2017, the United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”), which regulates LIBOR, announced that the FCA intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. It is not possible to predict the effect of these changes, other reforms or the establishment of alternative reference rates in the United Kingdom or elsewhere. In the United States, efforts to identify a set of alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rates include proposals by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee of the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee has proposed the Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") as its recommended alternative to LIBOR, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR rates in April 2018. SOFR is intended to be a broad measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight that is collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. However, because SOFR is a broad U.S. Treasury repurchase agreement financing rate that represents overnight secured funding transactions, it differs fundamentally from LIBOR. For example, SOFR is a secured overnight rate, while LIBOR is an unsecured rate that represents interbank funding over different maturities. In addition, because SOFR is a transaction-based rate, it is backward-looking, whereas LIBOR is forward-looking. Because of these and other differences, there is no assurance that SOFR will perform in the same way as LIBOR would have performed at any time, and there is no guarantee that it is a comparable substitute for LIBOR. SOFR may fail to gain market acceptance.
In addition, although certain of our LIBOR based obligations provide for alternative methods of calculating the interest rate payable on certain of our obligations if LIBOR is not reported, which include, without limitation, requesting certain rates from major reference banks in London or New York, uncertainty as to the extent and manner of future changes may result in interest rates and/or payments that are higher than, lower than or that do not otherwise correlate over time with, the interest rates or payments that would have been made on our obligations if a LIBOR-based rate was available in its current form.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
NISOURCE INC.
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Discussed below are the principal properties held by us and our subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019.
Gas Distribution Operations
Refer to Item 1, "Business - Gas Distribution Operations" of this report for further information on Gas Distribution Operations properties.
Electric Operations
Refer to Item 1, "Business - Electric Operations" of this report for further information on Electric Operations properties.
Corporate and Other Operations
We own the Southlake Complex, our 325,000 square foot headquarters building located in Merrillville, Indiana.
Character of Ownership
Our principal properties and our subsidiaries principal properties are owned free from encumbrances, subject to minor exceptions, none of which are of such a nature as to impair substantially the usefulness of such properties. Many of our subsidiary offices in various communities served are occupied under leases. All properties are subject to routine liens for taxes, assessments and undetermined charges (if any) incidental to construction. It is our practice to regularly pay such amounts, as and when due, unless contested in good faith. In general, the electric lines, gas pipelines and related facilities are located on land not owned by us or our subsidiaries, but are covered by necessary consents of various governmental authorities or by appropriate rights obtained from owners of private property. We do not, however, generally have specific easements from the owners of the property adjacent to public highways over, upon or under which our electric lines and gas distribution pipelines are located. At the time each of the principal properties were purchased, a title search was made. In general, no examination of titles as to rights-of-way for electric lines, gas pipelines or related facilities was made, other than examination, in certain cases, to verify the grantors’ ownership and the lien status thereof.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For a description of our legal proceedings, see Note 18-C19-C "Legal Proceedings" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
SUPPLEMENTAL ITEM. INFORMATION ABOUT OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
NISOURCE INC.
The following is a list of the Executive Officers of the Registrant,our executive officers, including their names, ages, offices held and other recent business experience, as of February 1, 2019.
experience.
|
| | | | | |
| Name | | Age | | Office(s) Held in Past 5 Years |
| Joseph Hamrock | | 5556 |
| | President and Chief Executive Officer of NiSource since July 1, 2015.
|
| | | | | Executive Vice President and Group Chief Executive Officer of NiSource from May 2012 to July 2015.
|
| Donald E. Brown | | 4748 |
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of NiSource since June 2016.May 2015.
|
| | | | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and of NiSource since July 2015.
|
| | | | Treasurer of NiSource from July 2015 to June 2016. |
| | | | Executive Vice President, Finance Department of NiSource from March 2015 to July 2015.
|
| | | | | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of UGI Utilities, a division of UGI Corporation (gas and electric utility company) from 2010 to March 2015.
|
| Peter T. Disser | | 5051 |
| | Vice President, Internal Audit of NiSource since January 2019.
|
| | | | | Chief Operating Officer of NiSource Corporate Services from September 2018 throughto December 2018.
|
| | | | | Vice President, Audit of NiSource from November 2017 to September 2018.
|
| | | | | Vice President, of Planning and Analysis of NiSource from June 2016 to November 2017.
|
| | | | Vice President, Strategy and Planning of NiSource Corporate Services Company from July 2015 to May 2016.
|
| | | | | Chief Financial Officer of NIPSCO from 2012 to June 2016.2015.
|
| Carrie J. Hightman | | 6162 |
| | Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer of NiSource since 2007.
|
Violet G. SistovarisKenneth E. Keener | | 5755 |
| | ExecutiveSenior Vice President and President, NIPSCOChief Human Resources Officer of NiSource since October 2016.August 2019.
|
| | | | | Executive Vice President, NIPSCOTalent and Organizational Effectiveness of NiSource Corporate Services Company from June 20152012 to July 2019.
|
| Charles E. Shafer, II | | 50 |
| | Senior Vice President and Chief Safety Officer of NiSource since October 2016.2019.
|
| | | | | Senior Vice President, Gas Engineering and Gas Support Services of NiSource Corporate Services Company from January 2019 to September 2019.
|
| | | | Senior Vice President, Customer Services and New Business of NiSource Corporate Services Company from May 2016 through December 2018.
|
| | | | Vice President, Engineering and Construction of NiSource Corporate Services Company from June 2012 to May 2016.
|
| Violet G. Sistovaris | | 58 |
| | Executive Vice President and President, NIPSCO of NiSource since July 2015.
|
| | | | Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of NiSource from May 2014 to June 2015.
|
| Suzanne K. Surface | | 55 |
| | Chief Services Officer of NiSource since January 2019.
|
| | | | | Senior Vice President, and Chief Information OfficerAudit of NiSource Corporate Services from 2008September 2018 to May 2014. |
Suzanne K. Surface | | 54 |
| | Chief Services Officer of NiSource since January 2019.December 2018.
|
| | | | | Vice President, Audit of NiSource from September 2018 through December 2018. |
| | | | Vice President, Transformation Office of NiSource from August 2018 to September 2018.
|
| | | | | Vice President, Corporate Services Customer Value of NiSource Corporate Services from November 2017 to August 2018.
|
| | | | | Vice President, Audit of NiSource from July 2015 to November 2017.
|
| | | | | Vice President, Regulatory Strategy and Support of NiSource Corporate Services Company from July 2009 throughto June 2015.
|
| Pablo A. Vegas | | 4546 |
| | Executive Vice President and President, Gas Utilities of NiSource since January 2019.
|
| | | | | Executive Vice President and Chief Restoration Officer of NiSource Corporate Services sincefrom September 2018 throughto December 2018.
|
| | | | | Executive Vice President, Gas Business Segment and Chief Customer Officer of NiSource from May 2017 to September 2018.
|
| | | | | Executive Vice President and President, Columbia Gas Group from May 2016 to May 2017.
|
| | | | | President and Chief Operating Officer of American Electric Power Company of Ohio Company from May 2012 to May 2016.
|
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
NISOURCE INC.
NiSource’s common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “NI.”
Holders of shares of NiSource’s common stock are entitled to receive dividends if and when declared by NiSource’s Board out of funds legally available, subject to the prior dividend rights of holders of our preferred stock or the depositary shares representing such preferred stock outstanding, and if full dividends have not been declared and paid on all outstanding shares of preferred stock in any dividend period, no dividend may be declared or paid or set aside for payment on our common stock. The policy of the Board has been to declare cash dividends on a quarterly basis payable on or about the 20th day of February, May, August, and November. At its February 1, 2019January 31, 2020 meeting, the Board declared a quarterly common dividend of $0.20$0.21 per share, payable on February 20, 20192020 to holders of record on February 11, 2019.2020.
Although the Board currently intends to continue the payment of regular quarterly cash dividends on common shares, the timing and amount of future dividends will depend on the earnings of NiSource’s subsidiaries, their financial condition, cash requirements, regulatory restrictions, any restrictions in financing agreements and other factors deemed relevant by the Board. There can be no assurance that NiSource will continue to pay such dividends or the amount of such dividends.
As of February 12, 2019,18, 2020, NiSource had 20,06418,868 common stockholders of record and 372,494,365382,263,348 shares outstanding.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
NISOURCE INC.
The graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of NiSource’s common stock for the last five years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the S&P 500 and the Dow Jones Utility indices. On July 1, 2015, NiSource completed the Separation. Following the Separation, NiSource retained no ownership interest in CPG. The Separation is treated as a special dividend for purposes of calculating the total shareholder return, with the then-current market value of the distributed shares being deemed to have been reinvested on the Separation date in shares of NiSource common stock. A vertical line is included on the graph below to identify the periods before and after the Separation.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
NISOURCE INC.
The foregoing performance graph is being furnished as part of this annual report solely in accordance with the requirement under Rule 14a-3(b)(9) to furnish stockholders with such information, and therefore, shall not be deemed to be filed or incorporated by reference into any filings by NiSource under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.
The total shareholder return for NiSource common stock and the two indices is calculated from an assumed initial investment of $100 and assumes dividend reinvestment, including the impact of the distribution of CPG common stock in the Separation.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
NISOURCE INC.
The selected data presented below as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2018,2019, are derived from our Consolidated Financial Statements. The data should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements including the related notes thereto included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
| | Year Ended December 31, (dollars in millions except per share data) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 | | 2014 | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions except per share data) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2015 |
| Statement of Income Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Operating Revenues | $ | 5,114.5 |
| | $ | 4,874.6 |
| | $ | 4,492.5 |
| | $ | 4,651.8 |
| | $ | 5,272.4 |
| $ | 5,208.9 |
| | $ | 5,114.5 |
| | $ | 4,874.6 |
| | $ | 4,492.5 |
| | $ | 4,651.8 |
|
| Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders | (65.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
| | 331.5 |
| | 198.6 |
| | 256.2 |
| 328.0 |
| | (65.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
| | 331.5 |
| | 198.6 |
|
| Balance Sheet Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total Assets | 21,804.0 |
| | 19,961.7 |
| | 18,691.9 |
| | 17,492.5 |
| | 24,589.8 |
| 22,659.8 |
| | 21,804.0 |
| | 19,961.7 |
| | 18,691.9 |
| | 17,492.5 |
|
| Capitalization | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Stockholders’ equity | 5,750.9 |
| | 4,320.1 |
| | 4,071.2 |
| | 3,843.5 |
| | 6,175.3 |
| 5,986.7 |
| | 5,750.9 |
| | 4,320.1 |
| | 4,071.2 |
| | 3,843.5 |
|
| Long-term debt, excluding amounts due within one year | 7,105.4 |
| | 7,512.2 |
| | 6,058.2 |
| | 5,948.5 |
| | 8,151.5 |
| 7,856.2 |
| | 7,105.4 |
| | 7,512.2 |
| | 6,058.2 |
| | 5,948.5 |
|
| Total Capitalization | $ | 12,856.3 |
| | $ | 11,832.3 |
| | $ | 10,129.4 |
| | $ | 9,792.0 |
| | $ | 14,326.8 |
| $ | 13,842.9 |
| | $ | 12,856.3 |
| | $ | 11,832.3 |
| | $ | 10,129.4 |
| | $ | 9,792.0 |
|
| Per Share Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share ($) | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
| | $ | 0.81 |
| $ | 0.88 |
| | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
|
| Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share ($) | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
| | $ | 0.81 |
| $ | 0.87 |
| | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | 1.01 |
| | $ | 0.63 |
|
| Other Data: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends declared per common share ($) | $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 0.70 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
| $ | 0.80 |
| | $ | 0.78 |
| | $ | 0.70 |
| | $ | 0.64 |
| | $ | 0.83 |
|
| Common shares outstanding at the end of the year (in thousands) | 372,363 |
| | 337,016 |
| | 323,160 |
| | 319,110 |
| | 316,037 |
| 382,136 |
| | 372,363 |
| | 337,016 |
| | 323,160 |
| | 319,110 |
|
| Number of common stockholders | 19,889 |
| | 21,009 |
| | 22,272 |
| | 30,190 |
| | 25,233 |
| 18,725 |
| | 19,889 |
| | 21,009 |
| | 22,272 |
| | 30,190 |
|
| Dividends declared per Series A preferred share ($) | $ | 28.88 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 56.50 |
| | $ | 28.88 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Dividends declared per Series B preferred share ($) | | $ | 1,674.65 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Capital expenditures | $ | 1,814.6 |
| | $ | 1,753.8 |
| | $ | 1,490.4 |
| | $ | 1,367.5 |
| | $ | 1,339.6 |
| $ | 1,867.8 |
| | $ | 1,814.6 |
| | $ | 1,753.8 |
| | $ | 1,490.4 |
| | $ | 1,367.5 |
|
| Number of employees | 8,087 |
| | 8,175 |
| | 8,007 |
| | 7,596 |
| | 8,982 |
| 8,363 |
| | 8,087 |
| | 8,175 |
| | 8,007 |
| | 7,596 |
|
During 2019, we recorded a loss of approximately $284 million for third-party claims and approximately $154 million for other incident-related expenses in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident. Columbia of Massachusetts recorded $665 million for insurance recoveries through December 31, 2019. For additional information, see Note 19-C, "Legal Proceedings," and E, "Other Matters" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
InDuring the fourth quarter of 2019, we recorded an impairment charge of $204.8 million for goodwill and an impairment charge of $209.7 million for franchise rights, in each case related to Columbia of Massachusetts. For additional information, see Note 6, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During the third quarter of 2019, we closed our placement of $750.0 million of 2.95% senior unsecured notes maturing in 2029.
During the second quarter of 2018, we completed the sale of 24,964,163 shares of $0.01 par value common stock at a price of $24.28 per share in a private placement to selected institutional and accredited investors and issued 400,000 shares of Series A preferred stock resulting in $400.0 million of gross proceeds or $393.9 million of net proceeds, after deducting commissions and sales expenses. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of 2018, we issued 20,000 shares of Series B preferred stock resulting in $500.0 million of gross proceeds or $486.1 million of net proceeds, after deducting commissions and sales expenses.
During 2018, we recorded a loss of approximately $757 million for third-party claims and approximately $266 million for other incident-related expenses in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident. Columbia of Massachusetts recorded $135 million for insurance recoveries through December 31, 2018. The amounts set forth above do not includeFor additional information, see Note 19-C, "Legal Proceedings," and E, Other Matters." in the estimated capital cost of the pipeline replacement, which is set forth in " - E. Other Matters - Greater Lawrence Pipeline Replacement."Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During the second quarter of 2018, we executed a tender offer for $209.0 million of outstanding notes consisting of a combination of our 6.80% notes due 2019, 5.45% notes due 2020 and 6.125% notes due 2022. During the third quarter of 2018, we redeemed $551.1 million of outstanding notes representing the remainder of our 6.80% notes due 2019, 5.45% notes due 2020 and 6.125% notes due 2022. In conjunction with our debt retired, we recorded a $45.5 million loss on early extinguishment of long-term debt primarily attributable to early redemption premiums.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
NISOURCE INC.
The decrease in net income during 2017 was due primarily to increased tax expense as a result of the impact of adopting the provisions of the TCJA and a loss on early extinguishment of long-term debt, as discussed below.
During the second quarter of 2017, we executed a tender offer for $990.7 million of outstanding notes consisting of a combination of our 6.40% notes due 2018, 6.80% notes due 2019, 5.45% notes due 2020, and 6.125% notes due 2022. In conjunction with the debt retired, we recorded a $111.5 million loss on early extinguishment of long-term debt, primarily attributable to early redemption premiums.
Prior to the Separation, CPG closed the placement of $2,750.0 million in aggregate principal amount of senior notes. Using the proceeds from this offering, CPG made cash payments to us representing the settlement of inter-company borrowings and the payment of a one-time special dividend. In May 2015, using proceeds from the cash payments from CPG, we settled two bank term loans in the amount of $1,075.0 million and executed a tender offer for $750.0 million consisting of a combination of its 5.25% notes due 2017, 6.40% notes due 2018 and 4.45% notes due 2021. In conjunction with the debt
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
NISOURCE INC.
retired, we recorded a $97.2 million loss on early extinguishment of long-term debt, primarily attributable to early redemption premiums.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
NISOURCE INC.
|
| |
| Index | Page |
| Executive Summary | |
| Summary of Consolidated Financial Results | |
| Results and Discussion of Segment Operations | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | |
| Electric Operations | |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (Management’s Discussion) analyzes our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and those of our subsidiaries. It also includes management’s analysis of past financial results and certain potential factors that may affect future results, potential future risks and approaches that may be used to manage those risks. See "Note regarding forward-looking statements" at the beginning of this report for a list of factors that may cause results to differ materially.
Management’s Discussion is designed to provide an understanding of our operations and financial performance and should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this annual report.
We are an energy holding company under the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 2005 whose subsidiaries are fully regulated natural gas and electric utility companies serving customers in seven states. We generate substantially all of our operating income through these rate-regulated businesses which are summarized for financial reporting purposes into two primary reportable segments: Gas Distribution Operations and Electric Operations.
Refer to the “Business” section under Item 1 of this annual report and Note 22,23, "Segments of Business," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of our regulated utility business segments.
Our goal is to develop strategies that benefit all stakeholders as we address changing customer conservation patterns, develops more contemporary pricing structures and embarks on long-term infrastructure investment and safety programs. These strategies are intended to improve reliability and safety, enhance customer services and reduce emissions while generating sustainable returns. Additionally, we continue to pursue regulatory and legislative initiatives that will allow residential customers not currently on our system to obtain gas service in a cost effective manner. Refer also to the discussion of Electric Supply within our Electric Operations Segment discussion for additional information on our long term electric generation strategy.
Greater Lawrence Incident: The Greater Lawrence Incident occurred on September 13, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018, weThe following table summarizes expenses incurred and insurance recoveries recorded a loss of approximately $757 million for third-party claims and approximately $266 million for other incident-related expenses in connection withsince the Greater Lawrence Incident. The amounts set forth abovein the table below do not include the estimated capital cost of the pipeline replacement described below and as set forth in "Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - E. Other Matters - Greater Lawrence Pipeline Replacement.Replacement," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended | | Year Ended | |
| (in millions) | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2019 | Incident to Date |
| Third-party claims and government fines, penalties and settlements | $ | 757 |
| | $ | 284 |
| $ | 1,041 |
|
| Other incident-related costs | 266 |
| | 154 |
| 420 |
|
| Total | 1,023 |
| | 438 |
| 1,461 |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded | (135 | ) | | (665 | ) | (800 | ) |
| Loss (benefit) to income before income taxes | $ | 888 |
| | $ | (227 | ) | $ | 661 |
|
Inclusive of the $1,041 million of third-party claims and fines, penalties and settlements associated with government investigations recorded incident to date, we estimate that total costs related to third-party claims as set forth in Note 18, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings," will range from $757 million to $790 million, depending on the final outcome of ongoing reviews and the number, nature, and value of third-party claims. We expect to incur a total of $330 million to $345 million in other incident-related costs.
We also expect to incur expenses for which we cannot estimate the amounts of or the timing at this time, including expenses associated with government investigations and fines, penalties orand settlements with governmental authorities in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident.associated
Columbia of Massachusetts recorded $135 million for insurance recoveries during 2018. Of this amount, $5 million was collected during 2018. We are currently unable to predict the amount and timing of future insurance recoveries. To the extent that we are not successful in collecting reimbursement in the amount recorded for such recoveries as of December 31, 2018, it could result in a charge to earnings.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Columbiawith government investigations as set forth in Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings," will range from $1,041 million to $1,065 million, depending on the number, nature, final outcome and value of Massachusetts paid approximately $167third-party claims and the final outcome of government investigations. These costs do not include costs of certain third-party claims and fines, penalties or settlements with government investigations that we are not able to estimate. We expect to incur a total of $450 million for the replacementto $460 million in other incident-related costs, inclusive of the entire affected 45-mile cast iron$420 million recorded incident to date, as set forth in Note 19, "Other Commitments and bare steel pipeline system that delivers gasContingencies - E. Other Matters - Greater Lawrence Incident Restoration."
The process for estimating costs associated with third-party claims and fines, penalties and settlements associated with government investigations relating to those impacted in the Greater Lawrence Incident during 2018. We estimate this replacement work will cost between $220 millionrequires management to exercise significant judgment based on a number of assumptions and $230 million in total. Columbia of Massachusetts has provided notice to its property insurersubjective factors. As more information becomes known, including additional information regarding ongoing investigations, management’s estimates and assumptions regarding the financial impact of the Greater Lawrence Incident may change.
The aggregate amount of third-party liability insurance coverage available for losses arising from the Greater Lawrence Incident is $800 million. We have collected the entire $800 million as of December 31, 2019. Expenses related to the incident have exceeded the total amount of insurance coverage available under our policies. The following table presents activity related to our Greater Lawrence Incident insurance recovery.
|
| | | |
| (in millions) | Insurance receivable(1) |
| Balance, December 31, 2018 | $ | 130 |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded in first quarter of 2019 | 100 |
|
| Cash collected from insurance recoveries in the first quarter of 2019 | (108 | ) |
| Balance, March 31, 2019 | 122 |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded in the second quarter of 2019 | 435 |
|
| Cash collected from insurance recoveries in the second quarter of 2019 | (297 | ) |
| Balance, June 30, 2019 | $ | 260 |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded in third quarter of 2019 | — |
|
| Cash collected from insurance recoveries in the third quarter of 2019 | (260 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2019 | $ | — |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 | 130 |
|
| Cash collected from insurance recoveries in the fourth quarter of 2019 | (130 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | $ | — |
|
(1)$5 million of insurance recoveries were collected during 2018.
Since the Greater Lawrence Incident and discussions aroundthrough December 31, 2019, we have invested approximately $258 million of capital spend for the claimpipeline replacement; this work was completed in 2019. We maintain property insurance for gas pipelines and other applicable property. Columbia of Massachusetts has filed a proof of loss with its property insurer for the full cost of the pipeline replacement. In January 2020, we filed a lawsuit against the property insurer, seeking payment of our property claim. We are currently unable to predict the timing or amount of any insurance recovery have commenced.under the property policy. The recovery of any capital investment not reimbursed through insurance will be addressed in a future regulatory proceeding.proceeding; a future regulatory proceeding is dependent on the outcome of the sale of the Massachusetts Business. The outcome of such a proceeding (if any) is uncertain. If at any point Columbia of Massachusetts concludesIn accordance with ASC 980-360, if it isbecomes probable that anya portion of this capital investment isthe pipeline replacement cost will not be recoverable through customer rates that portionand an amount can be reasonably estimated, we will reduce our regulated plant balance for the amount of the capital investment, if estimable, would be immediately chargedprobable disallowance and record an associated charge to earnings.
As discussed This could result in Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Columbiaa material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of Massachusetts withdrew its petition for a base rate revenue increase, resulting in delayed increases in forecasted revenuesoperations and cash flows beginning the first quarter of 2019.
flows. Additionally, as discussed in Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," we concluded the Greater Lawrence Incident wasif a triggering event requiring a quantitative analysis of goodwill for the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit. While no impairmentrate order is received allowing recovery of the goodwill balance was recorded in 2018, future unfavorable events that transpire at Columbia of Massachusetts could trigger the need for another quantitative analysis andinvestment with no or reduced return on investment, a goodwill impairment loss wouldon disallowance may be required if it's determined Columbia of Massachusetts fair value is less than its book value.required.
Refer to Note 18-C19, "Other Commitments and E, "LegalContingencies - C. Legal Proceedings" and "Other" - E. Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, "Summary of Consolidated Financial Results," "Results and Discussion of Segment Operation - Gas Distribution Operations," and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" in this Management's Discussion and Part I. Item 1A. "Risk Factors" for additional information related to the Greater Lawrence Incident.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Additionally, as discussed in Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we assessed the totality of several factors that developed during the fourth quarter related to the Greater Lawrence Incident and concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit was below its carrying value. As a result, a new impairment analysis was required for our Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit. The year-end impairment analysis indicated that the fair value of the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit was below its carrying value. As a result, we reduced the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit goodwill balance to zero and recognized a goodwill impairment charge totaling $204.8 million, which is non-deductible for tax purposes. We assessed the same fourth quarter circumstances in reviewing the Columbia of Massachusetts franchise rights intangible assets. These factors led us to conclude that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the franchise rights was below its carrying amount. As a result, we performed a year-end impairment test and determined that the fair value of the franchise rights was zero. Therefore, we wrote off the entire franchise rights book value, which resulted in an impairment charge totaling $209.7 million.
Columbia of Massachusetts Asset Sale:On February 26, 2020, NiSource and Columbia of Massachusetts entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Eversource. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement, NiSource and Columbia of Massachusetts agreed to sell to Eversource the Massachusetts Business for a purchase price of $1,100 million, subject to adjustment. For additional information, see Note 26, “Subsequent Event,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Summary of Consolidated Financial Results
Our operations are affected by the cost of sales. Cost of sales for the Gas Distribution Operations segment is principally comprised of the cost of natural gas used while providing transportation and distribution services to customers. Cost of sales for the Electric Operations segment is comprised of the cost of coal, related handling costs, natural gas purchased for the internal generation of electricity at NIPSCO and the cost of power purchased from third-party generators of electricity.
The majority of the cost of sales are tracked costs that are passed through directly to the customer resulting in an equal and offsetting amount reflected in operating revenues. As a result, we believe net revenues, a non-GAAP financial measure defined as operating revenues less cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization), provides management and investors a useful measure to analyze profitability. The presentation of net revenues herein is intended to provide supplemental information for investors regarding operating performance. Net revenues do not intend to represent operating income, the most comparable GAAP measure, as an indicator of operating performance and is not necessarily comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
NISOURCE INC.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, operating income and a reconciliation of net revenues to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, operating income, was as follows:
| | Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 vs. 2017 | | 2017 vs. 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| Operating Income | $ | 124.7 |
| | $ | 921.2 |
| | $ | 866.1 |
| | $ | (796.5 | ) | | $ | 55.1 |
| $ | 890.7 |
| | $ | 124.7 |
| | $ | 921.2 |
| | $ | 766.0 |
| | $ | (796.5 | ) |
| | Year Ended December 31, (in millions, except per share amounts) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 vs. 2017 | | 2017 vs. 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| Operating Revenues | $ | 5,114.5 |
| | $ | 4,874.6 |
| | $ | 4,492.5 |
| | $ | 239.9 |
| | $ | 382.1 |
| $ | 5,208.9 |
| | $ | 5,114.5 |
| | $ | 4,874.6 |
| | $ | 94.4 |
| | $ | 239.9 |
|
| Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) | 1,761.3 |
| | 1,518.7 |
| | 1,390.2 |
| | 242.6 |
| | 128.5 |
| 1,534.8 |
| | 1,761.3 |
| | 1,518.7 |
| | (226.5 | ) | | 242.6 |
|
| Total Net Revenues | 3,353.2 |
| | 3,355.9 |
| | 3,102.3 |
| | (2.7 | ) | | 253.6 |
| 3,674.1 |
| | 3,353.2 |
| | 3,355.9 |
| | 320.9 |
| | (2.7 | ) |
| Other Operating Expenses | 3,228.5 |
| | 2,434.7 |
| | 2,236.2 |
| | 793.8 |
| | 198.5 |
| 2,783.4 |
| | 3,228.5 |
| | 2,434.7 |
| | (445.1 | ) | | 793.8 |
|
| Operating Income | 124.7 |
| | 921.2 |
| | 866.1 |
| | (796.5 | ) | | 55.1 |
| 890.7 |
| | 124.7 |
| | 921.2 |
| | 766.0 |
| | (796.5 | ) |
| Total Other Deductions, Net | (355.3 | ) | | (478.2 | ) | | (352.5 | ) | | 122.9 |
| | (125.7 | ) | (384.1 | ) | | (355.3 | ) | | (478.2 | ) | | (28.8 | ) | | 122.9 |
|
| Income Taxes | (180.0 | ) | | 314.5 |
| | 182.1 |
| | (494.5 | ) | | 132.4 |
| 123.5 |
| | (180.0 | ) | | 314.5 |
| | 303.5 |
| | (494.5 | ) |
| Net Income (Loss) | (50.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
| | 331.5 |
| | (179.1 | ) | | (203.0 | ) | 383.1 |
| | (50.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
| | 433.7 |
| | (179.1 | ) |
| Preferred dividends | (15.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (15.0 | ) | | — |
| (55.1 | ) | | (15.0 | ) | | — |
| | (40.1 | ) | | (15.0 | ) |
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders
| (65.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
| | 331.5 |
| | (194.1 | ) | | (203.0 | ) | 328.0 |
| | (65.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
| | 393.6 |
| | (194.1 | ) |
| Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | 1.03 |
| | $ | (0.57 | ) | | $ | (0.64 | ) | $ | 0.88 |
| | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | 1.06 |
| | $ | (0.57 | ) |
| Basic Average Common Shares Outstanding | 356.5 |
| | 329.4 |
| | 321.8 |
| | 27.1 |
| | 7.6 |
| 374.6 |
| | 356.5 |
| | 329.4 |
| | 18.1 |
| | 27.1 |
|
On a consolidated basis, we reported net income available to common shareholders of $328.0 million or $0.88 per basic share for the twelve months ended December 31, 2019 compared to a loss to common shareholders of $65.6 million or $0.18 per basic share for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 compared tosame period in 2018. The increase in net income available to common shareholders of $128.5 million or $0.39 per basic share for the same period in 2017. The decrease in net income during 20182019 was primarily due to lower operating expenses related to the Greater Lawrence Incident, restoration,insurance recoveries recorded related to the Greater Lawrence Incident, and new rates from base rate proceedings and infrastructure replacement programs. These increases were partially offset by non-cash impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets in 2019 related to Columbia of Massachusetts (see Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information), higher income taxes (see "Income Taxes" below), higher depreciation expense due to regulatory outcomes at NIPSCO and Columbia of Ohio, and additional dilution in 2019 resulting from preferred stock dividend commitments and other changes in operating income, as discussed below, partially offset by the effects of implementing the TCJA and higher losses on early extinguishment of long-term debt expenses in 2017.commitments.
Operating Income
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2018,2019, we reported operating income of $124.7$890.7 million compared to $921.2$124.7 million for the same period in 2017.2018. The decreasedincreased operating income was primarily due to increased operation and maintenancedecreased operating expenses related to the Greater Lawrence Incident, decreased net revenues resultinginsurance recoveries recorded related to the Greater Lawrence Incident, and new rates from TCJA impacts on revenuebase rate proceedings and increased depreciation due to capital expenditures placed in service.infrastructure replacement programs. These increases were partially offset by higher ratesnon-cash impairments of goodwill and other intangible assets in 2019 related to Columbia of Massachusetts (see Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Asset," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information), and increased depreciation due to the regulatory outcome of NIPSCO's gas rate case and an increase in amortization of depreciation previously deferred as a regulatory asset resulting from infrastructure replacement programs and base-rate proceedings, decreased outside service costs and employee and administrative expenses, as well as net favorable effectsColumbia of year-over-year weather variations, which increased revenue in 2018.Ohio's CEP.
Other Deductions, Net
Other deductions, net reduced income by $355.3$384.1 million in 20182019 compared to a reduction in income of $478.2$355.3 million in 2017.2018. This change is primarily due to lower losses on early extinguishment of long-term debt in 2018 of $66.0 million, an interest rate swap settlement gain in 2018 of $46.2 million and higher actuarial investment returns resultingon pension and other postretirement benefit assets of $34.6 million, and an increase in interest expense of $25.6 million driven by decreased regulatory deferrals from pension contributions made in 2017.Columbia of Ohio's CEP. These favorableunfavorable variances were partially offset by charitable contributions of $20.7 million in 2018 related to the Greater Lawrence Incident.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the TCJA, which, among other things, enacted significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, including a reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, and certain other provisions related specifically to the public utility industry, including the continuation of certain interest expense deductibility and excluding 100% expensing of capital investments. These changes are effective January 1, 2018. GAAP requires the effect of a change in tax law to be recorded in the period of enactment. As a result, in December 2017, NiSource recorded a $161.1 million netThe increase in tax expense related primarily to the remeasurement of deferred tax assets for NOL carryforwards.
The decrease in income tax expense from 20172018 to 20182019 is primarily attributable to higher pre-tax income resulting from the decreaseitems discussed above in the federal corporate income tax rate,"Operating Income" and "Other Deductions, Net," true-ups to tax expense in 2018 to reflect regulatory outcomes associated with excess deferred income taxes, and higher income tax expense in 2019 related to the effectnon-deductible, non-cash impairment of amortizing the regulatory liability associated with excess deferred income taxesgoodwill, fines and lower pre-tax income resulting from expenses incurred for the Greater Lawrence Incident.penalties.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and Note 10, "Income Taxes," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on income taxes and the change in the effective tax rate.
Capital Investment
In 2018,2019, we invested approximately $1.8$1.9 billion in cash capital expenditures across the gas and electric utilities. These expenditures were primarily aimed at furthering the safety and reliability of our gas distribution system, the Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement, construction of new electric transmission assets and maintaining our existing electric generation fleet.
We continue to execute on an estimated $30 billion in total projected long-term regulated utility infrastructure investments and expect to invest approximately $1.6$1.8 to $1.7$1.9 billion in capital during 2019 to2020 as we continue to modernizefocus on growth, safety and improve our systemmodernization projects across all seven states of our operating area.
Liquidity
As discussed in further detail below in “LiquidityA primary focus of ours is to ensure the availability of adequate financing to fund our ongoing safety and Capital Resources,”infrastructure investment programs which typically involves the TCJA has and will continueissuance of debt and/or equity. In addition, expenses related to have an unfavorable impact on our liquidity. Additionally, expenses paid for the Greater Lawrence Incident are expectedhave exceeded the total amount of insurance coverage available under our policies. During 2020, we plan to have a short term negative impact on liquidity as recoveriespursue alternatives to cover this shortfall, including long-term financing and potential proceeds from insurance lag behind our cash outlay. Liquidity will also be negatively impactedthe sale of the Massachusetts Business. For additional information, see Note 26, "Subsequent Event," in the Notes to the extent certain costs associated with the Greater Lawrence Incident are not recovered from insurance. Consolidated Financial Statements.
Through income generated from operating activities, amounts available under our short-term revolving credit facility, commercial paper program, accounts receivable securitization facilities, term loan borrowings, long-term debt agreements, and our ability to access the capital markets and the potential sale of the Massachusetts Business, we believe there is adequate capital available to fund our operating activities and capital expenditures and the effects of the Greater Lawrence Incident in 20192020 and beyond. At December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we had approximately $974.6$1,409.1 million and $998.9$974.6 million, respectively, of net liquidity available, consisting of cash and available capacity under credit facilities.
These factors and other impacts to the financial results are discussed in more detail within the following discussions of “Results and Discussion of Segment Operations” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”
Regulatory Developments
In 2018,2019, we continued to move forward on core infrastructure and environmental investment programs supported by complementary regulatory and customer initiatives across all seven states of our operating area. Refer to Note 8, “Regulatory Matters” and Note 18-E,19-E, "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a complete discussion of key regulatory developments that transpired during 2018.2019.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION OF SEGMENT OPERATIONS
Presentation of Segment Information
Our operations are divided into two primary reportable segments: Gas Distribution Operations and Electric Operations.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Gas Distribution Operations
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, operating income (loss) and a reconciliation of net revenues to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, operating income (loss), was as follows:
| | Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 vs. 2017 | | 2017 vs. 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (254.1 | ) | | $ | 550.1 |
| | $ | 569.7 |
| | $ | (804.2 | ) | | $ | (19.6 | ) | $ | 675.4 |
| | $ | (254.1 | ) | | $ | 550.1 |
| | $ | 929.5 |
| | $ | (804.2 | ) |
| | Year Ended December 31, (dollars in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 vs. 2017 | | 2017 vs. 2016 | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| Net Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating revenues | $ | 3,419.5 |
| | $ | 3,102.1 |
| | $ | 2,830.6 |
| | $ | 317.4 |
| | $ | 271.5 |
| $ | 3,522.8 |
| | $ | 3,419.5 |
| | $ | 3,102.1 |
| | $ | 103.3 |
| | $ | 317.4 |
|
| Less: Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) | 1,259.3 |
| | 1,005.0 |
| | 895.4 |
| | 254.3 |
| | 109.6 |
| 1,067.6 |
| | 1,259.3 |
| | 1,005.0 |
| | (191.7 | ) | | 254.3 |
|
| Net Revenues | 2,160.2 |
| | 2,097.1 |
| | 1,935.2 |
| | 63.1 |
| | 161.9 |
| 2,455.2 |
| | 2,160.2 |
| | 2,097.1 |
| | 295.0 |
| | 63.1 |
|
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operation and maintenance | 1,908.1 |
| | 1,090.8 |
| | 941.5 |
| | 817.3 |
| | 149.3 |
| 935.7 |
| | 1,908.1 |
| | 1,090.8 |
| | (972.4 | ) | | 817.3 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 301.0 |
| | 269.3 |
| | 252.9 |
| | 31.7 |
| | 16.4 |
| 403.2 |
| | 301.0 |
| | 269.3 |
| | 102.2 |
| | 31.7 |
|
| Loss on sale of assets and impairments, net | 0.2 |
| | 2.8 |
| | — |
| | (2.6 | ) | | 2.8 |
| |
| Impairment of other intangible assets | | 209.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 209.7 |
| | — |
|
| Loss on sale of fixed assets and impairments, net | | 0.1 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 2.8 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (2.6 | ) |
| Other taxes | 205.0 |
| | 184.1 |
| | 171.1 |
| | 20.9 |
| | 13.0 |
| 231.1 |
| | 205.0 |
| | 184.1 |
| | 26.1 |
| | 20.9 |
|
| Total Operating Expenses | 2,414.3 |
| | 1,547.0 |
| | 1,365.5 |
| | 867.3 |
| | 181.5 |
| 1,779.8 |
| | 2,414.3 |
| | 1,547.0 |
| | (634.5 | ) | | 867.3 |
|
| Operating Income (Loss) | $ | (254.1 | ) | | $ | 550.1 |
| | $ | 569.7 |
| | $ | (804.2 | ) | | $ | (19.6 | ) | $ | 675.4 |
| | $ | (254.1 | ) | | $ | 550.1 |
| | $ | 929.5 |
| | $ | (804.2 | ) |
| Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | $ | 2,248.3 |
| | $ | 2,029.4 |
| | $ | 1,823.4 |
| | $ | 218.9 |
| | $ | 206.0 |
| $ | 2,317.2 |
| | $ | 2,248.3 |
| | $ | 2,029.4 |
| | $ | 68.9 |
| | $ | 218.9 |
|
| Commercial | 753.7 |
| | 669.4 |
| | 588.1 |
| | 84.3 |
| | 81.3 |
| 775.1 |
| | 753.7 |
| | 669.4 |
| | 21.4 |
| | 84.3 |
|
| Industrial | 228.6 |
| | 217.5 |
| | 194.3 |
| | 11.1 |
| | 23.2 |
| 245.8 |
| | 228.6 |
| | 217.5 |
| | 17.2 |
| | 11.1 |
|
| Off-System | 92.4 |
| | 111.8 |
| | 94.4 |
| | (19.4 | ) | | 17.4 |
| 77.7 |
| | 92.4 |
| | 111.8 |
| | (14.7 | ) | | (19.4 | ) |
| Other | 96.5 |
| | 74.0 |
| | 130.4 |
| | 22.5 |
| | (56.4 | ) | 107.0 |
| | 96.5 |
| | 74.0 |
| | 10.5 |
| | 22.5 |
|
| Total | $ | 3,419.5 |
| | $ | 3,102.1 |
| | $ | 2,830.6 |
| | $ | 317.4 |
| | $ | 271.5 |
| $ | 3,522.8 |
| | $ | 3,419.5 |
| | $ | 3,102.1 |
| | $ | 103.3 |
| | $ | 317.4 |
|
| Sales and Transportation (MMDth) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | 280.3 |
| | 247.1 |
| | 248.9 |
| | 33.2 |
| | (1.8 | ) | 274.9 |
| | 280.3 |
| | 247.1 |
| | (5.4 | ) | | 33.2 |
|
| Commercial | 187.6 |
| | 169.3 |
| | 165.6 |
| | 18.3 |
| | 3.7 |
| 189.6 |
| | 187.6 |
| | 169.3 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 18.3 |
|
| Industrial | 555.7 |
| | 517.5 |
| | 517.7 |
| | 38.2 |
| | (0.2 | ) | 542.5 |
| | 555.7 |
| | 517.5 |
| | (13.2 | ) | | 38.2 |
|
| Off-System | 30.0 |
| | 39.0 |
| | 39.6 |
| | (9.0 | ) | | (0.6 | ) | 32.9 |
| | 30.0 |
| | 39.0 |
| | 2.9 |
| | (9.0 | ) |
| Other | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | 0.4 |
| 0.3 |
| | — |
| | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | (0.3 | ) |
| Total | 1,053.6 |
| | 973.2 |
| | 971.7 |
| | 80.4 |
| | 1.5 |
| 1,040.2 |
| | 1,053.6 |
| | 973.2 |
| | (13.4 | ) | | 80.4 |
|
| Heating Degree Days | 5,562 |
| | 4,927 |
| | 5,148 |
| | 635 |
| | (221 | ) | 5,375 |
| | 5,562 |
| | 4,927 |
| | (187 | ) | | 635 |
|
| Normal Heating Degree Days | 5,610 |
| | 5,610 |
| | 5,642 |
| | — |
| | (32 | ) | 5,452 |
| | 5,610 |
| | 5,610 |
| | (158 | ) | | — |
|
| % Warmer than Normal | (1 | )% | | (12 | )% | | (9 | )% | |
|
| |
|
| (1 | )% | | (1 | )% | | (12 | )% | |
|
| |
|
|
| Gas Distribution Customers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | 3,194,662 |
| | 3,168,516 |
| | 3,141,736 |
| | 26,146 |
| | 26,780 |
| 3,221,178 |
| | 3,194,662 |
| | 3,168,516 |
| | 26,516 |
| | 26,146 |
|
| Commercial | 281,563 |
| | 280,362 |
| | 279,556 |
| | 1,201 |
| | 806 |
| 282,778 |
| | 281,517 |
| | 280,362 |
| | 1,261 |
| | 1,155 |
|
| Industrial | 6,038 |
| | 6,228 |
| | 6,240 |
| | (190 | ) | | (12 | ) | 5,982 |
| | 5,833 |
| | 6,228 |
| | 149 |
| | (395 | ) |
| Other | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) | | 4 |
| 3 |
| | 3 |
| | 4 |
| | — |
| | (1 | ) |
| Total | 3,482,266 |
| | 3,455,110 |
| | 3,427,532 |
| | 27,156 |
| | 27,578 |
| 3,509,941 |
| | 3,482,015 |
| | 3,455,110 |
| | 27,926 |
| | 26,905 |
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Gas Distribution Operations (continued)
Comparability of line item operating results may be impacted by regulatory, tax and depreciation trackers (other than those for cost of sales) that allow for the recovery in rates of certain costs. Therefore, increases in these tracked operating expenses are generally offset by increases in net revenues and have essentially no impact on net income.
2019 vs. 2018 Operating Income
For 2019, Gas Distribution Operations reported operating income of $675.4 million, an increase in income of $929.5 million from the comparable 2018 period.
Net revenues for 2019 were $2,455.2 million, an increase of $295.0 million from the same period in 2018. The change in net revenues was primarily driven by:
New rates from base rate proceedings and infrastructure replacement programs of $243.2 million.
Higher regulatory, depreciation, and tax trackers, which are offset in operating expense, of $36.2 million.
Higher revenues of $14.5 million resulting from an update in the weather-related normal heating degree day methodology (see further detail below), partially offset by a $7.1 million revenue decrease from the effects of warmer weather in 2019.
The effects of commercial and residential customer growth of $12.8 million.
Operating expenses were $634.5 million lower in 2019 compared to 2018. This change was primarily driven by:
Decreased expenses related to third-party claims and other costs for the Greater Lawrence Incident of $1,090.7 million, net of insurance recoveries recorded.
Partially offset by:
Non-cash impairment of the Columbia of Massachusetts franchise rights of $209.7 million.
Increased depreciation of $103.8 million due to the regulatory outcome of NIPSCO's gas rate case, an increase in amortization of depreciation previously deferred as a regulatory asset resulting from Columbia of Ohio's CEP, and higher capital expenditures placed in service.
Higher employee and administrative expenses of $50.2 million driven by resources shifting from the temporary assistance on the Greater Lawrence Incident restoration to normal operations (offset in the decreased Greater Lawrence Incident costs discussed above) and an increase in headcount.
Increased regulatory, depreciation, and tax trackers, which are offset in net revenues, of $36.2 million.
Higher property taxes of $22.2 million primarily due to increased amortization of property taxes previously deferred as a regulatory asset resulting from Columbia of Ohio's CEP, as well as higher capital expenditures placed in service.
Higher outside services of $17.4 million primarily due to increased line location and safety-related work.
Higher insurance expense of $9.1 million primarily driven by increased premiums.
2018 vs. 2017 Operating Income
For 2018, Gas Distribution Operations reported an operating loss of $254.1 million, a decrease in income of $804.2 million from the comparable 2017 period.
Net revenues for 2018 were $2,160.2 million, an increase of $63.1 million from the same period in 2017. The change in net revenues was primarily driven by:
New rates from infrastructure replacement programs and base rate proceedings of $99.6 million.
Higher revenues from the effects of colder weather in 2018 of $37.5 million.
The effects of customer growth and increased usage of $17.4 million.
Higher regulatory, tax and depreciation trackers, which are offset in operating expense, of $16.0 million.
Partially offset by:
A revenue reserve of $85.0 million in 2018 resulting from the probable future refund of certain collections from customers as a result of the lower income tax rate from the TCJA.
Decreased rates from implementation of regulatory outcomes related to the TCJA of $24.7 million.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Gas Distribution Operations (continued)
Operating expenses were $867.3 million higher in 2018 compared to 2017. This change was primarily driven by:
Expenses related to third-party claims and other costs followingfor the Greater Lawrence Incident of $864.4 million, net of insurance recoveries recorded.
Increased depreciation of $29.6 million due to regulatory outcomes of NIPSCO's gas rate case and higher capital expenditures placed in service.
Higher regulatory, tax and depreciation trackers, which are offset in net revenues, of $16.0 million.
Increased property taxes of $11.0 million due to higher capital expenditures placed in service and the impact of regulatory-driven property tax deferrals.
Partially offset by:
Decreased outside services of $33.2 million primarily due to IT service provider transition and other strategic initiative costs in 2017, lower ongoing IT costs and a temporary shift of resources to the Greater Lawrence Incident restoration.
Lower employee and administrative expenses of $30.2 million driven by reduced incentive compensation and a temporary shift of resources to the Greater Lawrence Incident restoration.
2017 vs. 2016 Operating Income
For 2017, Gas Distribution Operations reported operating income of $550.1 million, a decrease of $19.6 million from the comparable 2016 period.
Net revenues for 2017 were $2,097.1 million, an increase of $161.9 million from the same period in 2016. The change in net revenues was primarily driven by:
New rates from base-rate proceedings and infrastructure replacement programs of $124.2 million.
Higher regulatory, tax and depreciation trackers, which are offset in operating expense, of $26.9 million.
The effects of increased customer growth of $10.3 million.
Higher revenues from increased industrial usage of $5.8 million.
Operating expenses were $181.5 million higher in 2017 compared to 2016. This change was primarily driven by:
Increased employee and administrative expenses of $53.4 million.
Higher outside service costs of $52.8 million due to IT service provider transition costs, increased spend on strategic initiatives to enhance safety, reliability and customer value and higher pipeline maintenance expenses.
Increased regulatory, tax and depreciation trackers, which are offset in net revenues, of $26.9 million.
Higher depreciation of $15.2 million due to increased capital expenditures placed in service.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Gas Distribution Operations (continued)
Increased property taxes of $8.1 million due to higher capital expenditures placed in service and an accrual adjustment recorded in 2016.
Higher environmental costs of $4.7 million.
Increased materials and supplies expenses of $3.4 million from maintenance-related activities.
Weather
In general, we calculate the weather-related revenue variance based on changing customer demand driven by weather variance from normal heating degree days. Our composite heating degree days reported do not directly correlate to the weather-related dollar impact on the results of Gas Distribution Operations. Heating degree days experienced during different times of the year or in different operating locations may have more or less impact on volume and dollars depending on when and where they occur. When the detailed results are combined for reporting, there may be weather-related dollar impacts on operations when there is not an apparent or significant change in our aggregated composite heating degree day comparison.
The definition of “normal” weather was updated during the first quarter of 2019 to reflect more current weather pattern data and to more closely align with the regulators' jurisdictional definitions of “normal” weather. Impacts of the change in methodology will be reflected prospectively and disclosed to the extent it results in notable year-over-year variances in net revenues.
Weather in the Gas Distribution Operations service territories for 2019 was about 1% warmer than normal and about 3% warmer than 2018; however, due to the aforementioned change in methodology, the change in net revenues attributed to weather resulted in an increase of $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018. The variance is detailed further below:
An update in the weather-related normal heating degree day methodology resulting in a favorable variance attributed to weather of $14.5 million, as discussed above.
Offset by:
The effects of warmer weather in 2019 of $7.1 million.
Weather in the Gas Distribution Operations service territories for 2018 was about 1% warmer than normal and about 13% colder than 2017, increasing net revenues $37.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017.
Weather in the Gas Distribution Operations service territories for 2017 was about 12% warmer than normalThroughput
Total volumes sold and about 4% warmer than 2016, decreasing net revenues $1.7 milliontransported for the year ended December 31, 20172019 were 1,040.2 MMDth, compared to 2016.
Throughput1,053.6 MMDth for 2018. This decrease is primarily attributable to warmer weather experienced in 2019 compared to 2018.
Total volumes sold and transported for the year ended December 31, 2018 were 1,053.6 MMDth, compared to 973.2 MMDth for 2017. This increase is primarily attributable to colder weather experienced in 2018 compared to 2017.
Total volumes sold and transported for the year ended December 31, 2017 were 973.2 MMDth, compared to 971.7 MMDth for 2016.
Economic Conditions
All of our Gas Distribution Operations companies have state-approved recovery mechanisms that provide a means for full recovery of prudently incurred gas costs. Gas costs are treated as pass-through costs and have no impact on the net revenues recorded in the period. The gas costs included in revenues are matched with the gas cost expense recorded in the period and the difference is recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as under-recovered or over-recovered gas cost to be included in future customer billings.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Gas Distribution Operations (continued)
Certain Gas Distribution Operations companies continue to offer choice opportunities, where customers can choose to purchase gas from a third-party supplier, through regulatory initiatives in their respective jurisdictions. These programs serve to further reduce our exposure to gas prices.
Greater Lawrence Incident
Refer to Note 18-C.19-C. "Legal Proceedings," and E. "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, "Summary of Consolidated Financial Results,""LiquidityResults" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources" in this Management's Discussion, and Part I. Item 1A. "Risk Factors" for additional information related to the Greater Lawrence Incident.
Columbia of Massachusetts Asset Sale
On February 26, 2020, we entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Eversource providing for the sale of the Massachusetts Business to Eversource, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the agreement. For additional information, see Note 26, “Subsequent Event,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Electric Operations
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, operating income and a reconciliation of net revenues to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, operating income, was as follows:
| | Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 vs. 2017 | | 2017 vs. 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| Operating Income | $ | 386.1 |
| | $ | 367.4 |
| | $ | 301.3 |
| | $ | 18.7 |
| | $ | 66.1 |
| $ | 406.8 |
| | $ | 386.1 |
| | $ | 367.4 |
| | $ | 20.7 |
| | $ | 18.7 |
|
| | Year Ended December 31, (dollars in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 vs. 2017 | | 2017 vs. 2016 | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 vs. 2018 | | 2018 vs. 2017 |
| Net Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating revenues | $ | 1,708.2 |
| | $ | 1,786.5 |
| | $ | 1,661.6 |
| | $ | (78.3 | ) | | $ | 124.9 |
| $ | 1,699.2 |
| | $ | 1,708.2 |
| | $ | 1,786.5 |
| | $ | (9.0 | ) | | $ | (78.3 | ) |
| Less: Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) | 502.1 |
| | 513.9 |
| | 495.0 |
| | (11.8 | ) | | 18.9 |
| 467.3 |
| | 502.1 |
| | 513.9 |
| | (34.8 | ) | | (11.8 | ) |
| Net Revenues | 1,206.1 |
| | 1,272.6 |
| | 1,166.6 |
| | (66.5 | ) | | 106.0 |
| 1,231.9 |
| | 1,206.1 |
| | 1,272.6 |
| | 25.8 |
| | (66.5 | ) |
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operation and maintenance | 500.0 |
| | 565.6 |
| | 528.9 |
| | (65.6 | ) | | 36.7 |
| 495.0 |
| | 500.0 |
| | 565.6 |
| | (5.0 | ) | | (65.6 | ) |
| Depreciation and amortization | 262.9 |
| | 277.8 |
| | 274.5 |
| | (14.9 | ) | | 3.3 |
| 277.3 |
| | 262.9 |
| | 277.8 |
| | 14.4 |
| | (14.9 | ) |
| Loss on sale of assets | — |
| | 1.9 |
| | — |
| | (1.9 | ) | | 1.9 |
| |
| Loss (gain) on sale of fixed assets and impairments, net | | (0.1 | ) | | — |
| | 1.9 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | (1.9 | ) |
| Other taxes | 57.1 |
| | 59.9 |
| | 61.9 |
| | (2.8 | ) | | (2.0 | ) | 52.9 |
| | 57.1 |
| | 59.9 |
| | (4.2 | ) | | (2.8 | ) |
| Total Operating Expenses | 820.0 |
| | 905.2 |
| | 865.3 |
| | (85.2 | ) | | 39.9 |
| 825.1 |
| | 820.0 |
| | 905.2 |
| | 5.1 |
| | (85.2 | ) |
| Operating Income | $ | 386.1 |
| | $ | 367.4 |
| | $ | 301.3 |
| | $ | 18.7 |
| | $ | 66.1 |
| $ | 406.8 |
| | $ | 386.1 |
| | $ | 367.4 |
| | $ | 20.7 |
| | $ | 18.7 |
|
| Revenues | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | $ | 494.7 |
| | $ | 476.9 |
| | $ | 457.4 |
| | $ | 17.8 |
| | $ | 19.5 |
| $ | 481.6 |
| | $ | 494.7 |
| | $ | 476.9 |
| | $ | (13.1 | ) | | $ | 17.8 |
|
| Commercial | 492.6 |
| | 501.2 |
| | 456.6 |
| | (8.6 | ) | | 44.6 |
| 486.7 |
| | 492.6 |
| | 501.2 |
| | (5.9 | ) | | (8.6 | ) |
| Industrial | 614.4 |
| | 698.1 |
| | 631.6 |
| | (83.7 | ) | | 66.5 |
| 608.4 |
| | 614.4 |
| | 698.1 |
| | (6.0 | ) | | (83.7 | ) |
| Wholesale | 15.7 |
| | 11.6 |
| | 11.6 |
| | 4.1 |
| | — |
| 11.7 |
| | 15.7 |
| | 11.6 |
| | (4.0 | ) | | 4.1 |
|
| Other | 90.8 |
| | 98.7 |
| | 104.4 |
| | (7.9 | ) | | (5.7 | ) | 110.8 |
| | 90.8 |
| | 98.7 |
| | 20.0 |
| | (7.9 | ) |
| Total | $ | 1,708.2 |
| | $ | 1,786.5 |
| | $ | 1,661.6 |
| | $ | (78.3 | ) | | $ | 124.9 |
| $ | 1,699.2 |
| | $ | 1,708.2 |
| | $ | 1,786.5 |
| | $ | (9.0 | ) | | $ | (78.3 | ) |
| Sales (Gigawatt Hours) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | 3,535.2 |
| | 3,301.7 |
| | 3,514.8 |
| | 233.5 |
| | (213.1 | ) | 3,369.5 |
| | 3,535.2 |
| | 3,301.7 |
| | (165.7 | ) | | 233.5 |
|
| Commercial | 3,844.6 |
| | 3,793.5 |
| | 3,878.7 |
| | 51.1 |
| | (85.2 | ) | 3,760.3 |
| | 3,844.6 |
| | 3,793.5 |
| | (84.3 | ) | | 51.1 |
|
| Industrial | 8,829.5 |
| | 9,469.7 |
| | 9,281.8 |
| | (640.2 | ) | | 187.9 |
| 8,466.1 |
| | 8,829.5 |
| | 9,469.7 |
| | (363.4 | ) | | (640.2 | ) |
| Wholesale | 114.3 |
| | 32.5 |
| | 19.0 |
| | 81.8 |
| | 13.5 |
| 8.2 |
| | 114.3 |
| | 32.5 |
| | (106.1 | ) | | 81.8 |
|
| Other | 124.4 |
| | 128.2 |
| | 136.9 |
| | (3.8 | ) | | (8.7 | ) | 117.2 |
| | 124.4 |
| | 128.2 |
| | (7.2 | ) | | (3.8 | ) |
| Total | 16,448.0 |
| | 16,725.6 |
| | 16,831.2 |
| | (277.6 | ) | | (105.6 | ) | 15,721.3 |
| | 16,448.0 |
| | 16,725.6 |
| | (726.7 | ) | | (277.6 | ) |
| Cooling Degree Days | 1,180 |
| | 837 |
| | 988 |
| | 343 |
| | (151 | ) | 962 |
| | 1,180 |
| | 837 |
| | (218 | ) | | 343 |
|
| Normal Cooling Degree Days | 806 |
| | 806 |
| | 806 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 803 |
| | 806 |
| | 806 |
| | (3 | ) | | — |
|
| % Warmer than Normal | 46 | % | | 4 | % | | 23 | % | |
|
| |
|
| 20 | % | | 46 | % | | 4 | % | |
|
| |
|
|
| Electric Customers | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | 412,267 |
| | 409,401 |
| | 407,268 |
| | 2,866 |
| | 2,133 |
| 415,534 |
| | 412,267 |
| | 409,401 |
| | 3,267 |
| | 2,866 |
|
| Commercial | 56,605 |
| | 56,134 |
| | 55,605 |
| | 471 |
| | 529 |
| 57,058 |
| | 56,605 |
| | 56,134 |
| | 453 |
| | 471 |
|
| Industrial | 2,284 |
| | 2,305 |
| | 2,313 |
| | (21 | ) | | (8 | ) | 2,256 |
| | 2,284 |
| | 2,305 |
| | (28 | ) | | (21 | ) |
| Wholesale | 735 |
| | 739 |
| | 744 |
| | (4 | ) | | (5 | ) | 726 |
| | 735 |
| | 739 |
| | (9 | ) | | (4 | ) |
| Other | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 2 |
| | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | 471,893 |
| | 468,581 |
| | 465,932 |
| | 3,312 |
| | 2,649 |
| 475,576 |
| | 471,893 |
| | 468,581 |
| | 3,683 |
| | 3,312 |
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Electric Operations (continued)
Comparability of line item operating results may be impacted by regulatory and depreciation trackers (other than those for cost of sales) that allow for the recovery in rates of certain costs. Therefore, increases in these tracked operating expenses are offset by increases in net revenues and have essentially no impact on net income.
2019 vs. 2018 Operating Income
For 2019, Electric Operations reported operating income of $406.8 million, an increase of $20.7 million from the comparable 2018 period.
Net revenues for 2019 were $1,231.9 million, an increase of $25.8 million from the same period in 2018. The change in net revenues was primarily driven by:
New rates from the recent rate case proceeding, incremental capital spend on infrastructure replacement programs, and electric transmission projects of $24.8 million.
Decreased fuel handling costs of $11.0 million.
Higher regulatory and depreciation trackers, which are offset in operating expense, of $8.4 million.
Increased commercial and residential customer growth of $3.9 million.
Partially offset by:
Lower revenues from the effects of cooler weather of $15.1 million.
Decreased residential, commercial and industrial usage of $10.8 million.
Operating expenses were $5.1 million higher in 2019 than 2018. This change was primarily driven by:
Higher regulatory and depreciation trackers, which are offset in net revenues, of $8.4 million.
Increased depreciation of $8.7 million due to higher capital expenditures placed in service.
Partially offset by:
Decreased materials and supplies costs of $7.8 million, primarily related to the retirement of Bailly Generating Station Units 7 and 8 on May 31, 2018.
Decreased employee and administrative costs of $5.0 million.
2018 vs. 2017 Operating Income
For 2018, Electric Operations reported operating income of $386.1 million, an increase of $18.7 million from the comparable 2017 period.
Net revenues for 2018 were $1,206.1 million, a decrease of $66.5 million from the same period in 2017. The change in net revenues was primarily driven by:
Lower regulatory and depreciation trackers, which are offset in operating expense, of $35.6 million.
Decreased rates from implementation of regulatory outcomes related to the TCJA of $32.9 million.
Decreased industrial usage of $17.1 million.
A revenue reserve of $16.2 million in 2018 resulting from the probable future refund of certain collections from customers as a result of the lower income tax rate from the TCJA .
Increased fuel handling costs of $7.3 million.
Partially offset by:
The effects of warmer weather of $25.2 million.
Increased rates from infrastructure replacement programs of $18.6 million.
Operating expenses were $85.2 million lower in 2018 than 2017. This change was primarily driven by:
Lower regulatory and depreciation trackers, which are offset in net revenues, of $35.6 million.
Lower outside service costs of $32.1 million and lower material and supplies costs of $10.2 million primarily related to the retirement of Bailly Generating Station Units 7 and 8 on May 31, 2018.
Decreased employee and administrative costs of $18.4 million.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Electric Operations (continued)
Partially offset by:
Increased depreciation of $10.0 million due to higher capital expenditures placed in service.
2017 vs. 2016 Operating Income
For 2017, Electric Operations reported operating income of $367.4 million, an increase of $66.1 million from the comparable 2016 period.
Net revenues for 2017 were $1,272.6 million, an increase of $106.0 million from the same period in 2016. The change in net revenues was primarily driven by:
New rates from base-rate proceedings of $63.6 million.
Increased rates from incremental capital spend on electric transmission projects of $24.2 million.
Higher regulatory and depreciation trackers, which are offset in operating expense, of $18.0 million.
New rates from infrastructure replacement programs of $6.0 million.
The effects of increased customer count of $3.4 million.
Partially offset by:
The effects of cooler weather of $16.1 million.
Operating expenses were $39.9 million higher in 2017 than 2016. This change was primarily driven by:
Higher outside service costs of $20.1 million, primarily due to increased spend on strategic initiatives to enhance safety, reliability and customer value, generation-related maintenance, IT service provider transition costs and vegetation management activities.
Higher employee and administrative costs of $19.2 million.
Increased regulatory and depreciation trackers, which are offset in net revenues, of $18.0 million.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Electric Operations (continued)
Increased depreciation of $5.6 million due to higher capital expenditures placed in service.
Higher materials and supplies costs of $4.5 million driven by generation-related maintenance.
Partially offset by:
Plant retirement costs of $22.1 million in 2016.
Decreased amortization of regulatory assets of $10.8 million.
Weather
In general, we calculate the weather-related revenue variance based on changing customer demand driven by weather variance from normal heating or cooling degree days. Our composite heating or cooling degree days reported do not directly correlate to the weather-related dollar impact on the results of Electric Operations. Heating or cooling degree days experienced during different times of the year may have more or less impact on volume and dollars depending on when they occur. When the detailed results are combined for reporting, there may be weather-related dollar impacts on operations when there is not an apparent or significant change in our aggregated composite heating or cooling degree day comparisoncomparison.
The definition of “normal” weather was updated during the first quarter of 2019 to reflect more current weather pattern data and to more closely align with the regulators' jurisdictional definitions of “normal” weather. Impacts of the change in methodology will be reflected prospectively and disclosed to the extent it results in notable year-over-year variances in net revenues.
Weather in the Electric Operations’ territories for 2019 was 20% warmer than normal and 18% cooler than the same period in 2018, decreasing net revenues $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018.
Weather in the Electric Operations’ territories for 2018 was 46% warmer than normal and 41% warmer than the same period in 2017, increasing net revenues $25.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to 2017.
Weather in the Sales
Electric Operations’ territoriesOperations sales were 15,721.3 GWh for 2017 was 4% warmer than normal and 15% cooler than the same period in 2016, decreasing net revenues $16.1 million for the year ended December 31, 20172019, a decrease of 726.7 GWh, or 4.4% compared to 2016.
Sales2018. This decrease was primarily attributable to higher internal generation from large industrial customers in 2019 and the effects of cooler weather on residential and commercial customers.
Electric Operations sales were 16,448.0 GWh for 2018, a decrease of 277.6 GWh, or 1.7% compared to 2017. This decrease was primarily attributable to higher internal generation from large industrial customers in 2018, partially offset by increased volumes for residential and commercial customers resulting from warmer weather.
Electric Operations sales were 16,725.6 GWh for 2017, a decrease of 105.6 GWh, or 0.6% compared to 2016.
BP Products North America. On March 29, 2018, WCE, which is currently owned by BP p.l.c ("BP") and BP Products North America, which operates the BP Refinery, filed a petition at the IURC asking that the combined operations of WCE and BP be treated as a single premise, and the WCE generation be dedicated primarily to BP Refinery operations beginning in May 2019 as WCE has self-certified as a qualifying facility at FERC. BP Refinery plansplanned to continue to purchase electric service from NIPSCO at a reduced demand level beginning May 2019; however, a settlement agreement was filed on November 2, 2018 agreeing that BP and WCE would not move forward with construction of a private transmission line to serve BP until conclusion of NIPSCO's pending electric rate case. The IURC approved the settlement agreement as filed on February 20, 2019. On December 4, 2019, the IURC issued an order in the electric rate case approving the implementation of a new industrial service structure. This resolved the issues included in BP’s original petition. Refer to Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Economic Conditions
NIPSCO has a state-approved recovery mechanism that provides a means for full recovery of prudently incurred fuel costs. Fuel costs are treated as pass-through costs and have no impact on the net revenues recorded in the period. The fuel costs included in revenues are matched with the fuel cost expense recorded in the period and the difference is recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as under-recovered or over-recovered fuel cost to be included in future customer billings.
NIPSCO's performance remains closely linked to the performance of the steel industry. NIPSCO’s MWh sales to steel-related industries accounted for approximately 49.67%51.5% and 54.5%49.7% of the total industrial MWh sales for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, respectively.
Electric Supply
Bailly Generating Station. NIPSCO completed the retirement of Units 7 and 8 at Bailly Generating Station on May 31, 2018. These units had a generating capacity of approximately 460 MW. The remaining net book value of the retired units is presented in "Regulatory assets (noncurrent)" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. This balance continues to be amortized at a rate consistent with its inclusion in customer rates. The ongoing recovery of our remaining investment in these units will be addressed in NIPSCO's rate case filed on October 31, 2018. Refer to Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," and Note 18-E, "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
NIPSCO 2018 Integrated Resource Plan. Multiple factors, but primarily economic ones, including low natural gas prices, advancing cost effective renewable technology and increasing capital and operating costs associated with existing coal plants, have led
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Electric Operations (continued)
NIPSCO to conclude in its October 2018 Integrated Resource Plan submission that NIPSCO’s current fleet of coal generation facilities will be retired earlier than previous Integrated Resource Plan’s had indicated.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Electric Operations (continued)
The Integrated Resource Plan evaluated demand-side and supply-side resource alternatives to reliably and cost effectively meet NIPSCO customers' future energy requirements over the ensuing 20 years. The preferred option within the Integrated Resource Plan retires R.M. Schahfer Generating Station (Units 14, 15, 17, and 18) by 2023 and Michigan City Generating Station (Unit 12) by 2028. These units represent 2,080 MW of generating capacity, equal to 72% of NIPSCO’s remaining capacity after the retirement of Bailly Units 7 and 8 in May of 2018.
The current replacement plan includes renewable sources of energy, including wind, solar, and battery storage to be obtained through a combination of NIPSCO ownership and PPAs. Refer to Note 18-E,19-E, "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
NISOURCE INC.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Greater Lawrence Incident: As discussed in the "Executive Summary" and in Note 18,19, “Other Commitments and Contingencies,”Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we have recorded lossesand paid costs associated with the Greater Lawrence Incident and have invested capital to replace the entire affected 45-mile cast iron and bare steel pipeline system that delivers gas to the impacted area. As discussed in the Executive"Executive Summary, and" Note 1819 referenced earlier in this paragraph, and Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors,” in this report, we may incur additional expenses and liabilities in excess of our recorded liabilities and estimated additional costs associated with the Greater Lawrence Incident. The timing and amount of future financing needs arising from the Greater Lawrence Incident, if any, will depend on the ultimate timing and amount of payments made in connection withSince the Greater Lawrence Incident and through December 31, 2019, we have collected $800 million from insurance providers; however, total costs related to the timing andincident have exceeded the total amount of associated insurance recoveries. Through income generated from operating activities, amountscoverage available under our policies. To date, this excess has primarily been funded through short-term revolving credit facility, commercial paper program, accounts receivable securitization facilities, term loanborrowings. During 2020, we plan to pursue alternatives to these short-term borrowings, which include long-term debt agreementsfinancing and our abilitypotential proceeds from the sale of the Massachusetts Business. For additional information, see Note 26, “Subsequent Event,” in the Notes to access the capital markets, we believe there is adequate capital available to fund these expenditures.Consolidated Financial Statements.
Operating Activities
Net cash from operating activities for the year ended December 31, 20182019 was $540.1$1,583.3 million, a decreasean increase of $202.1$1,043.2 million from 2017.2018. This decreaseincrease was driven primarily by the receipt of $795 million of insurance recoveries in 2019 related to the Greater Lawrence Incident and approximately $220 million lower cash spend for the Greater Lawrence Incident in 2018 offset by decreased pension plan contributions as discussed below as well as decreased operation2019. Refer to Note 19, "Other Commitments and maintenance expenses (excluding expensesContingencies" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information related to the Greater Lawrence Incident). The decrease in cash from operations was further offset by higher sales due to colder weather during the 2018 winter heating season compared to 2017 and increased rates from infrastructure replacement programs and rate case outcomes.Incident.
Greater Lawrence Incident. During 2018, we paid approximately $731 million in operating cash flow related to the Greater Lawrence Incident. Refer to Note 18-E "Other Matters" for further information.
Pension and Other Postretirement Plan Funding. In 2017,2019, we contributed $282.3$2.9 million to our pension plans (including a $277 million discretionary contribution made during the third quarter of 2017) and $31.6$23.0 million to our other postretirement benefit plans.
In 2018, we contributed $2.9 million to our pension plans and $21.0 million to our other postretirement benefit plans. Given the current funded status of the pension plans, and barring unforeseen market volatility that may negatively impact the valuation of our plan assets, we do not believe additional material contributions to our pension plans will be required for the foreseeable future.
Income Taxes. Rates for our regulated customers include provisions for the collection of U.S. federal income taxes. The reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate as a result of the TCJA has led to a decrease in the amount billed to customers through rates, ultimately resulting in lower cash collections from operating activities. As discussed in further detail in Note 7, "Regulatory Matters," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, our regulated subsidiaries are engaged with the relevant state utility commissions to address the impacts of the TCJA on future customer rates. During 2018, billings to customers decreased approximately $57.6 million compared to the same period in 2017 as a result of adjustments to certain rates in our Kentucky, Ohio, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts and Indiana jurisdictions. Additionally, during 2018, we recorded additional TCJA-related regulatory liabilities related to 2018 collections from customers, which are being refunded back to customers once new customer rates are approved by our regulators.
In addition, we will beare required to pass back to customers “excess deferred taxes” which represent amounts collected from customers in the past to cover deferred tax liabilities which, as a result of the passage of the TCJA, are now less than the originally billed amounts. Approximately $1.5 billion of excess deferred taxes was recorded to "Regulatory liabilities (noncurrent)" on the Consolidated Balance Sheetsas a regulatory liability as of December 31, 2017 as a result of implementing the TCJA. The majority of this balance related to temporary book-to-tax differences on utility property protected by IRS normalization rules. As modified rates are approved by each of our regulators, we expectrules; this portion of the excess deferred taxes balance will be passed back to customers over the remaining average useful life of the associated property as required by the TCJA. The pass back period for the remainder of thisthe excess deferred tax balance will beis passed back over periods determined by our state utility commissions in future proceedings. Our estimate of the amount and pass-back period of excess deferred taxes is subject to change pending final review by the utility commissions of the states in which we operate. As noted above, thiscommissions. The pass back of excess deferred taxes has already begunbeen approved in certain ofall our jurisdictions. As of December 31, 20182019, we have approximately $1.4$1.3 billion of remaining regulatory liabilities associated with excess deferred taxes. See Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we hadhave a recorded deferred tax asset of $759.6$657.1 million related to a federal NOL carryforward, of which $508.5$406.1 million relates to years prior to the implementation of the TCJA. As a result of being in an NOL position, we were not
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
required to make any cash payments for federal income tax purposes during the three years ended December 31, 2018.2019. The carryforward periods for pre-TCJA tax benefits expire in various tax years from 2028 to 2037,2037; however, we expect to fully utilize the carryforward benefit prior to its expiration. PerAccording to the TCJA, utilization of NOL carryforwards generated after December 31, 2017 do not expire but are limited to 80% of current year taxable income. Accordingly, we may be required to make cash payments for federal income taxes in future years despite having NOL carryforwards in excess of current taxes payable.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Investing Activities
Our cash used for investing activities varies year over year primarily as a result of changes in the level of annual capital expenditures. The table below reflects capital expenditures and certain other investing activities by segment for 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016.2017.
| | | (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018(3) | | 2017 |
| Gas Distribution Operations | | | | | | | | | | |
| System Growth and Tracker | $ | 1,073.7 |
| | $ | 909.2 |
| | $ | 835.0 |
| $ | 1,006.1 |
| | $ | 897.5 |
| | $ | 909.2 |
|
| Maintenance | 241.6 |
| | 216.4 |
| | 219.4 |
| 374.3 |
| | 417.8 |
| | 216.4 |
|
| Total Gas Distribution Operations | 1,315.3 |
| | 1,125.6 |
| | 1,054.4 |
| 1,380.3 |
| | 1,315.3 |
| | 1,125.6 |
|
| Electric Operations | | | | | | | | | | |
| System Growth and Tracker | 346.0 |
| | 435.3 |
| | 314.1 |
| 279.5 |
| | 346.0 |
| | 435.3 |
|
| Maintenance | 153.3 |
| | 157.1 |
| | 106.5 |
| 189.4 |
| | 153.3 |
| | 157.1 |
|
| Total Electric Operations | 499.3 |
| | 592.4 |
| | 420.6 |
| 468.9 |
| | 499.3 |
| | 592.4 |
|
Corporate and Other Operations - Maintenance(1) | — |
| | 35.8 |
| | 15.4 |
| 18.6 |
| | — |
| | 35.8 |
|
Total(2) | $ | 1,814.6 |
|
| $ | 1,753.8 |
|
| $ | 1,490.4 |
| $ | 1,867.8 |
|
| $ | 1,814.6 |
|
| $ | 1,753.8 |
|
(1)Zero Corporate and Other capital expenditures were zero in 2018 driven by the leasing ofas specific IT assets beginningwere leased in Q1 2018 versus historical practice of purchasing.2018. Certain IT and other maintenance related assets were purchased in 2017 and 2019.
(2)Amounts differ from those presented on the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows primarily due to the capitalized portion of the Corporate Incentive Plan payout, inclusion of capital expenditures included in current liabilities and AFUDC Equity.
(3) The 2018 capital expenditures for Gas Distribution Operations reflects reclassifying the Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement from system growth and tracker to maintenance.
For 2019, capital expenditures and certain other investing activities were $1,867.8 million, which was $53.2 million higher than the 2018 capital program. This increased spending is primarily due to growth, safety and system modernization projects.
For 2018, capital expenditures and certain other investing activities were $1,814.6 million, which was $60.8 million higher than the 2017 capital program. This increased spending is due in part to costs associated with the Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement, gas transmission projects, environmental investments and system modernization projects.projects across all seven states in our operating area.
For 2017, capital expenditures and certain other investing activities were $1,753.8 million, which was $263.4 million higher than the 2016 capital program. This increased spending is mainly due to electric transmission projects, environmental investments and system modernization projects.
For 2019,2020, we project to invest approximately $1.6$1.8 to $1.7$1.9 billion in our capital program. This projected level of spend is consistent with 20182019 spend levels and is expected to focus primarily on the continuation of thegrowth, safety, and modernization projects segment growth across the Gas Distribution Operations segment, and TDSIC spend.our operating area.
Financing Activities
Short-term Debt. Refer to Note 15, “Short-Term Borrowings,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on short-term debt.
Long-term Debt. Refer to Note 14, “Long-Term Debt,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on long-term debt.
Net Available Liquidity. As of December 31, 2018,2019, an aggregate of $974.6$1,409.1 million of net liquidity was available, including cash and credit available under the revolving credit facility and accounts receivable securitization programs.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
NISOURCE INC.
The following table displays NiSource's liquidity position as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
| | Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 | 2018 |
| Current Liquidity | | |
| Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 1,850.0 |
| $ | 1,850.0 |
| $ | 1,850.0 |
| $ | 1,850.0 |
|
Accounts Receivable Program(1) | 399.2 |
| 336.7 |
| 353.2 |
| 399.2 |
|
| Less: | | |
| Commercial Paper | 978.0 |
| 869.0 |
| 570.0 |
| 978.0 |
|
| Accounts Receivable Program Utilized | 399.2 |
| 336.7 |
| 353.2 |
| 399.2 |
|
| Letters of Credit Outstanding Under Credit Facility | 10.2 |
| 11.1 |
| 10.2 |
| 10.2 |
|
| Add: | | |
| Cash and Cash Equivalents | 112.8 |
| 29.0 |
| 139.3 |
| 112.8 |
|
| Net Available Liquidity | $ | 974.6 |
| $ | 998.9 |
| $ | 1,409.1 |
| $ | 974.6 |
|
(1)Represents the lesser of the seasonal limit or maximum borrowings supportable by the underlying receivables.
Debt Covenants. We are subject to a financial covenant under our revolving credit facility and term loan agreement, which requires us to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio that does not exceed 70%. A similar covenant in a 2005 private placement note purchase agreement requires us to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio that does not exceed 75%. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the ratio was 61.4%61.7%.
Sale of Trade Accounts Receivables. Refer to Note 17,18, “Transfers of Financial Assets,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the sale of trade accounts receivable.
Credit Ratings. The credit rating agencies periodically review our ratings, taking into account factors such as our capital structure and earnings profile. The following table includes our and certain of our subsidiaries' credit ratings and ratings outlook as of December 31, 2018.2019.
A credit rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities, and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating organization.
|
| | | | | | |
| | S&P | Moody's | Fitch |
| | Rating | Outlook | Rating | Outlook | Rating | Outlook |
| NiSource | BBB+ | Negative | Baa2 | Stable | BBB | Stable |
| NIPSCO | BBB+ | Negative
| Baa1 | Stable | BBB | Stable |
| Columbia of Massachusetts | BBB+ | Negative
| Baa2 | Stable | Not rated | Not rated |
| Commercial Paper | A-2 | Negative
| P-2 | Stable | F2 | Stable |
Certain of our subsidiaries have agreements that contain “ratings triggers” that require increased collateral if our credit ratings or the credit ratings of certain of our subsidiaries are below investment grade. These agreements are primarily for insurance purposes and for the physical purchase or sale of power. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the collateral requirement that would be required in the event of a downgrade below the ratings trigger levels would amount to approximately $53.8$72.1 million. In addition to agreements with ratings triggers, there are other agreements that contain “adequate assurance” or “material adverse change” provisions that could necessitate additional credit support such as letters of credit and cash collateral to transact business.
Equity. Our authorized capital stock consists of 420,000,000620,000,000 shares, $0.01 par value, of which 400,000,000600,000,000 are common stock and 20,000,000 are preferred stock. As of December 31, 2018, 372,363,6562019, 382,135,680 shares of common stock and 420,000440,000 shares of preferred stock were outstanding. For more information regarding our common and preferred stock, see Note 12, "Equity," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
NISOURCE INC.
Contractual Obligations. We have certain contractual obligations requiring payments at specified periods. The obligations include long-term debt, lease obligations, energy commodity contracts and obligations for various services including pipeline capacity and outsourcing of IT services. The total contractual obligations in existence at December 31, 20182019 and their maturities were:
| | | (in millions) | Total | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | After | Total | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | After |
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 7,029.6 |
| | $ | 41.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 63.6 |
| | $ | 530.0 |
| | $ | 600.0 |
| | $ | 5,795.0 |
| $ | 7,738.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 63.6 |
| | $ | 530.0 |
| | $ | 600.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,545.0 |
|
Capital leases(2) | 322.4 |
| | 23.0 |
| | 22.5 |
| | 22.6 |
| | 22.1 |
| | 19.8 |
| | 212.4 |
| |
| Interest payments on long-term debt | 6,311.7 |
| | 319.8 |
| | 318.6 |
| | 318.6 |
| | 315.0 |
| | 289.0 |
| | 4,750.7 |
| 6,214.2 |
| | 342.0 |
| | 340.7 |
| | 337.1 |
| | 311.1 |
| | 299.9 |
| | 4,583.4 |
|
Finance leases(2) | | 325.9 |
| | 27.2 |
| | 27.3 |
| | 26.8 |
| | 23.1 |
| | 19.9 |
| | 201.6 |
|
Operating leases(3) | 45.9 |
| | 11.0 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 6.1 |
| | 4.2 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 14.5 |
| 79.1 |
| | 15.6 |
| | 9.4 |
| | 8.2 |
| | 7.6 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 31.7 |
|
Energy commodity contracts | 154.3 |
| | 99.2 |
| | 55.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 95.9 |
| | 65.5 |
| | 30.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Service obligations: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pipeline service obligations | 3,566.7 |
| | 592.3 |
| | 487.7 |
| | 450.5 |
| | 437.5 |
| | 260.8 |
| | 1,337.9 |
| 3,450.7 |
| | 605.0 |
| | 590.1 |
| | 546.8 |
| | 357.2 |
| | 237.5 |
| | 1,114.1 |
|
| IT service obligations | 211.0 |
| | 68.3 |
| | 60.0 |
| | 47.1 |
| | 35.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 153.2 |
| | 63.6 |
| | 49.4 |
| | 38.0 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 1.1 |
| | — |
|
Other service obligations | 86.7 |
| | 33.5 |
| | 43.6 |
| | 9.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 59.8 |
| | 45.8 |
| | 14.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other liabilities | 24.2 |
| | 24.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 27.3 |
| | 27.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 17,752.5 |
| | $ | 1,212.3 |
| | $ | 994.8 |
| | $ | 918.1 |
| | $ | 1,344.4 |
| | $ | 1,172.4 |
| | $ | 12,110.5 |
| $ | 18,144.7 |
| | $ | 1,192.0 |
| | $ | 1,124.9 |
| | $ | 1,486.9 |
| | $ | 1,300.1 |
| | $ | 565.0 |
| | $ | 12,475.8 |
|
(1) Long-term debt balance excludes unamortized issuance costs and discounts of $68.5$70.5 million.
(2) Capital Finance lease payments shown above are inclusive of interest totaling $114.6$108.3 million.
(3) Operating lease payments shown above are inclusive of interest totaling $14.3 million. Operating lease balances do not include amountsobligations for possible fleet leases that can be renewedvehicle lease renewals beyond the initial lease term. The Company anticipates renewingWhile we have the ability to renew these leases beyond the initial term, butwe are not reasonably certain (as that term is defined in ASC 842) to do so. If we were to continue the anticipatedfleet vehicle leases outstanding at December 31, 2019, payments associated with the renewals do not meet the definitionwould be $34.5 million in 2020, $28.3 million in 2021, $23.4 million in 2022, $19.9 million in 2023, $15.2 million in 2024 and $15.2 million thereafter.
(4)In January 2020, NIPSCO signed new coal contract commitments of expected minimum lease payments and therefore$14.4 million for 2020. These contracts are not included above. Expected payments are $26.7 million in 2019, $22.4 million in 2020, $16.6 million in 2021, $12.3 million in 2022, $9.3 million in 2023 and $8.8 million thereafter.
(5)In February 2020, NIPSCO signed a new railcar coal transportation contract commitment of $12.0 million for 2020. This contract is not included above.
Our calculated estimated interest payments for long-term debt is based on the stated coupon and payment dates. For 2019,2020, we project that we will be required to make interest payments of approximately $363.1$368.2 million, which includes $319.8$342.0 million of interest payments related to our long-term debt outstanding as of December 31, 2018.2019. At December 31, 2018,2019, we had $1,977.2$1,773.2 million in short-term borrowings outstanding.
Our expected payments included within “Other liabilities” in the table of contractual commitments above contains employer contributions to pension and other postretirement benefits plans expected to be made in 2019.2020. Plan contributions beyond 20192020 are dependent upon a number of factors, including actual returns on plan assets, which cannot be reliably estimated at this time. In 2019,2020, we expect to make contributions of approximately $3.0 million to our pension plans and approximately $20.6$24.0 million to our postretirement medical and life plans. Refer to Note 11, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
We cannot reasonably estimate the settlement amounts or timing of cash flows related to long-term obligations classified as “Total Other Liabilities” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, other than those described above.
We also have obligations associated with income, property, gross receipts, franchise, payroll, sales and use, and various other taxes and expect to make tax payments of approximately $240.6$247.1 million in 2019,2020, which are not included in the table above. In addition, we have uncertain income tax positions that are not included in the table above as we are unable to predict when the matters will be resolved. Refer to Note 10, "Income Taxes," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Refer to Note 18-A,19-A, “Contractual Obligations,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.
In January 2019, NIPSCO executed two 20 year PPAs to purchase 100% of the output from renewable generation facilities at a fixed price per mwh andMWh. Payments under the PPAs will not begin until the associated generation facilities are constructed by the owner / seller which is currently scheduled to be complete by the end of 2020 for one facility. Payments that will be made under the agreements are not included in the table of contractual commitments above as there are no minimum payment obligations under the agreements. NIPSCO has filed a notice with the IURC of its intention not to move forward with one of its approved PPAs due to the failure to meet a condition precedent in the agreement as a result of local zoning restrictions. See Note 19-E, “Other Matters - NIPSCO 2018 Integrated Resource Plan,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
In January 2019, NIPSCO executed a BTA with a developer to construct a renewable generation facility.facility with a nameplate capacity of approximately 100 MW; construction of the facility is expected to be completed by the end of 2020. In October 2019, NIPSCO
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
executed a BTA with a developer to construct an additional renewable generation facility with a nameplate capacity of approximately 300 MW; construction of this facility is expected to be completed by the end of 2021. Payments under these agreementagreements are not included in the table aboveof contractual commitments as NIPSCO's purchase requirement under these agreements were executed in 2019 and remain subject toBTAs is dependent on satisfactory approval of the BTAs by the relevant regulatory authorities before the deals would commence.IURC, successful execution of agreements with a tax equity partner, and timely completion of construction. See 18-E. "OtherNote 19-E, “Other Matters - NIPSCO 2018 Integrated Resource Plan,"” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We, along with certain of our subsidiaries, enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries. Such agreements include guarantees and stand-by letters of credit.
Refer to Note 18,19, “Other Commitments and Contingencies,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about such arrangements.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Market Risk Disclosures
Risk is an inherent part of our businesses. The extent to which we properly and effectively identify, assess, monitor and manage each of the various types of risk involved in our businesses is critical to our profitability. We seek to identify, assess, monitor and manage, in accordance with defined policies and procedures, the following principal market risks that are involved in our businesses: commodity price risk, interest rate risk and credit risk. Risk management for us is a multi-faceted process with oversight by the Risk Management Committee that requires constant communication, judgment and knowledge of specialized products and markets. Our senior management takes an active role in the risk management process and has developed policies and procedures that require specific administrative and business functions to assist in the identification, assessment and control of various risks. These may include, but are not limited to market, operational, financial, compliance and strategic risk types. In recognition of the increasingly varied and complex nature of the energy business, our risk management process, policies and procedures continue to evolve and are subject to ongoing review and modification.
Commodity Price Risk
We are exposed to commodity price risk as a result of our subsidiaries’ operations involving natural gas and power. To manage this market risk, our subsidiaries use derivatives, including commodity futures contracts, swaps, forwards and options. We do not participate in speculative energy trading activity.
Commodity price risk resulting from derivative activities at our rate-regulated subsidiaries is limited, since regulations allow recovery of prudently incurred purchased power, fuel and gas costs through the rate-making process, including gains or losses on these derivative instruments. If states should explore additional regulatory reform, these subsidiaries may begin providing services without the benefit of the traditional rate-making process and may be more exposed to commodity price risk.
Our subsidiaries are required to make cash margin deposits with their brokers to cover actual and potential losses in the value of outstanding exchange traded derivative contracts. The amount of these deposits, some of which is reflected in our restricted cash balance, may fluctuate significantly during periods of high volatility in the energy commodity markets.
Refer to Note 9, "Risk Management Activities," in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our commodity price risk assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018.
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of changes in interest rates on borrowings under our revolving credit agreement, commercial paper program, term loan borrowingsagreement and accounts receivable programs, which have interest rates that are indexed to short-term market interest rates. Based upon average borrowings and debt obligations subject to fluctuations in short-term market interest rates, an increase (or decrease) in short-term interest rates of 100 basis points (1%) would have increased (or decreased) interest expense by $19.0 million and $13.3 million for 2019 and $15.8 million for 2018, and 2017, respectively. We are also exposed to interest rate risk as a result of changes in benchmark rates that can influence the interest rates of future debt issuances.
Refer to Note 9, "Risk Management Activities," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on our interest rate risk assets and liabilities as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Credit Risk
Due to the nature of the industry, credit risk is embedded in many of our business activities. Our extension of credit is governed by a Corporate Credit Risk Policy. In addition, Risk Management Committee guidelines are in place which document management approval levels for credit limits, evaluation of creditworthiness, and credit risk mitigation efforts. Exposures to credit risks are monitored by the risk management function which is independent of commercial operations. Credit risk arises due to the possibility that a customer, supplier or counterparty will not be able or willing to fulfill its obligations on a transaction on or before the settlement date. For derivative-related contracts, credit risk arises when counterparties are obligated to deliver or purchase defined commodity units of gas or power to us at a future date per execution of contractual terms and conditions. Exposure to credit risk is measured in terms of both current obligations and the market value of forward positions net of any posted collateral such as cash and letters of credit.
We closely monitor the financial status of our banking credit providers. We evaluate the financial status of our banking partners through the use of market-based metrics such as credit default swap pricing levels, and also through traditional credit ratings provided by major credit rating agencies.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
Other Information
Critical Accounting Policies
We apply certain accounting policies based on the accounting requirements discussed below that have had, and may continue to have, significant impacts on our operations and Consolidated Financial Statements.
Basis of Accounting for Rate-Regulated Subsidiaries. ASC Topic 980, Regulated Operations, provides that rate-regulated subsidiaries account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the economic effect of the way in which regulators establish rates, if the rates established are designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and if the competitive environment makes it probable that such rates can be charged and collected. Certain expenses and credits subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income are deferred on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are recognized in income as the related amounts are included in service rates and recovered from or refunded to customers. The total amounts of regulatory assets and liabilities reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $2,239.6 million and $2,512.2 million at December 31, 2019, and $2,237.5 million and $2,660.0 million at December 31, 2018, and $1,801.2 million and $2,795.6 million at December 31, 2017, respectively. For additional information, refer to Note 8, “Regulatory Matters,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In the event that regulation significantly changes the opportunity for us to recover our costs in the future, all or a portion of our regulated operations may no longer meet the criteria for the application of ASC Topic 980, Regulated Operations. In such event, a write-down of all or a portion of our existing regulatory assets and liabilities could result. If transition cost recovery is approved by the appropriate regulatory bodies that would meet the requirements under GAAP for continued accounting as regulatory assets and liabilities during such recovery period, the regulatory assets and liabilities would be reported at the recoverable amounts. If we were unable to continue to apply the provisions of ASC Topic 980, Regulated Operations, we would be required to apply the provisions of ASC Topic 980-20, Discontinuation of Rate-Regulated Accounting. In management’s opinion, our regulated subsidiaries will be subject to ASC Topic 980, Regulated Operations for the foreseeable future.
Certain of the regulatory assets reflected on our Consolidated Balance Sheets require specific regulatory action in order to be included in future service rates. Although recovery of these amounts is not guaranteed, we believe that these costs meet the requirements for deferral as regulatory assets. Regulatory assets requiring specific regulatory action amounted to $320.4$307.2 million at December 31, 2018.2019. If we determine that the amounts included as regulatory assets were not recoverable, a charge to income would immediately be required to the extent of the unrecoverable amounts.
The passage of the TCJA into law in December 2017 necessitated the remeasurement of our deferred income tax balances to reflect the new U.S. corporate incomechange in the statutory federal tax rate offrom 35% to 21%. For our regulated entities, substantially all of the impact of this remeasurement was recorded to a regulatory asset or regulatory liability and is being passed backed to customers, as appropriate, until such time that we receive final regulatory orders prescribingestablished during the required accounting treatment and related impact on future customer rates.rate making process. For additional information, refer to Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," and Note 10, "Income Taxes," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
As discussed in Note 18-E,19-E, "Other Matters - Greater Lawrence Pipeline Replacement," since the Greater Lawrence Incident and through December 31, 2019, we incurredhave invested approximately $167$258 million of capital spend for the pipeline replacement in the affected communities during 2018.communities; this work was completed in 2019. We estimate this replacement work will cost between $220 millionmaintain property insurance for gas pipelines and $230 million in total.other applicable property. Columbia of Massachusetts has provided notice tofiled a proof of loss with its property insurer for the full cost of the Greater Lawrence Incident and discussions aroundpipeline replacement. In January 2020, we filed a lawsuit against the claim andproperty insurer, seeking payment of our property claim. We are currently unable
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
to predict the timing or amount of any insurance recovery have commenced.under the property policy. The recovery of any capital investment not reimbursed through insurance will be addressed in a future regulatory proceeding.proceeding; a future regulatory proceeding is dependent on the outcome of the sale of the Massachusetts Business. The outcome of such a proceeding (if any) is uncertain. In accordance with ASC 980-360, if it becomes probable that a portion of the pipeline replacement cost will not be recoverable through customer rates and an amount can be reasonably estimated, we will reduce our regulated plant balance for the amount of the probable disallowance and record an associated charge to earnings. This could result in a material adverse effect to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, if a rate order is received allowing recovery of the investment with no or reduced return on investment, a loss on disallowance may be required.
Pension and Postretirement Benefits. We have defined benefit plans for both pension and other postretirement benefits. The calculation of the net obligations and annual expense related to the plans requires a significant degree of judgment regarding the discount rates to be used in bringing the liabilities to present value, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, health care trend rates, and mortality rates, among other assumptions. Due to the size of the plans and the long-term nature of the associated liabilities, changes in the assumptions used in the actuarial estimates could have material impacts on the measurement of the net obligations and annual expense recognition. Differences between actuarial assumptions and actual plan results are deferred into AOCI or a regulatory balance sheet account, depending on the jurisdiction of our entity. These deferred gains or losses are then amortized into the income statement when the accumulated differences exceed 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets (known in GAAP as the “corridor” method) or when settlement accounting is triggered.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
The discount rates, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, health care cost trend rates and mortality rates are critical assumptions. Methods used to develop these assumptions are described below. While a third party actuarial firm assists with the development of many of these assumptions, we are ultimately responsible for selecting the final assumptions.
The discount rate is utilized principally in calculating the actuarial present value of pension and other postretirement benefit obligations and net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs. Our discount rates for both pension and other postretirement benefits are determined using spot rates along an AA-rated above median yield curve with cash flows matching the expected duration of benefit payments to be made to plan participants.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is a component utilized in calculating annual pension and other postretirement benefit plan costs. We estimate the expected return on plan assets by evaluating expected bond returns, equity risk premiums, target asset allocations, the effects of active plan management, the impact of periodic plan asset rebalancing and historical performance. We also consider the guidance from our investment advisors in making a final determination of our expected rate of return on assets.
For measurement of 20192020 net periodic benefit cost, we selected an expected pre-tax long-term rate of return of 6.10%5.70% and 5.80%5.67% for our pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets, respectively.
We estimate the assumed health care cost trend rate, which is used in determining our other postretirement benefit net expense, based upon our actual health care cost experience, the effects of recently enacted legislation, third-party actuarial surveys and general economic conditions.
We use the Society of Actuaries’ most recently published mortality data in developing a best estimate of mortality as part of the calculation of the pension and other postretirement benefit obligations.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
The following tables illustrate the effects of changes in these actuarial assumptions while holding all other assumptions constant:
| | | | Impact on December 31, 2018 Projected Benefit Obligation Increase/(Decrease) | Impact on December 31, 2019 Projected Benefit Obligation Increase/(Decrease) |
Change in Assumptions (in millions) | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| +50 basis points change in discount rate | $ | (79.6 | ) | | $ | (23.6 | ) | $ | (89.9 | ) | | $ | (29.0 | ) |
| -50 basis points change in discount rate | 86.2 |
| | 25.8 |
| 97.7 |
| | 31.8 |
|
| +50 basis points change in health care trend rates | | | 12.5 |
| | | 15.0 |
|
| -50 basis points change in health care trend rates | | | (11.0 | ) | | | (13.1 | ) |
| | | | | | | |
| | Impact on 2018 Expense Increase/(Decrease)(1) | Impact on 2019 Expense Increase/(Decrease)(1) |
Change in Assumptions (in millions) | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| +50 basis points change in discount rate | $ | (3.3 | ) | | $ | (0.7 | ) | $ | (1.8 | ) | | $ | 0.3 |
|
| -50 basis points change in discount rate | 2.8 |
| | 0.8 |
| 1.9 |
| | 0.7 |
|
| +50 basis points change in expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | (10.3 | ) | | (1.3 | ) | (8.9 | ) | | (1.2 | ) |
| -50 basis points change in expected long-term rate of return on plan assets | 10.3 |
| | 1.3 |
| 8.9 |
| | 1.2 |
|
| +50 basis points change in health care trend rates | | | 0.6 |
| | | 0.6 |
|
| -50 basis points change in health care trend rates | | | (0.5 | ) | | | (0.5 | ) |
(1)Before labor capitalization and regulatory deferrals.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
In January 2017, we changed the method used to estimate the service and interest components of net periodic benefit cost for pension and other postretirement benefits. This change, compared to the previous method, resulted in a decrease in the actuarially-determined service and interest cost components. Historically, we estimated service and interest cost utilizing a single weighted-average discount rate derived from the yield curve used to measure the benefit obligation at the beginning of the period. For fiscal 2017 and beyond, we now utilize a full yield curve approach to estimate these components by applying the specific spot rates along the yield curve used in the determination of the benefit obligation to the relevant projected cash flows. For further discussion of our pension and other postretirement benefits, see Note 11, “Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits,” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Goodwill.Goodwill and Intangible Assets. We have seven goodwill reporting units, comprised of the seven state operating companies within the Gas Distribution Operations reportable segment. Our goodwill assets at December 31, 20182019 were $1,690.7$1,486 million, most of which resulted from the acquisition of Columbia on November 1, 2000.
As required by GAAP, we test for impairment of goodwill on an annual basis and on an interim basis when events or circumstances indicate that a potential impairment may exist. Our annual goodwill test takes place in the second quarter of each year and was most recently finalized as ofperformed on May 1, 2018. In the third quarter of 2018, we determined the Greater Lawrence Incident represented a triggering event that required an impairment analysis of goodwill. The incident specifically impacts2019. A qualitative ("step 0") test was completed on May 1, 2019 for all reporting units other than our Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit. The quantitative impairmentIn the Step 0 analysis, as of September 30, 2018 determinedwe assessed various assumptions, events and circumstances that would have affected the estimated fair value of the applicable reporting units as compared to their baseline May 1, 2016 “step 1” fair value measurement. The results of this assessment indicated that it is not more likely than not that these reporting units fair values are less than their reporting unit carrying values; therefore, no “step 1” analysis was required.
The results of our Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit continued to exceed its carrying value. For additional information, refer towere negatively impacted by the Greater Lawrence Incident (see Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,19-C, "Legal Proceedings," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
WeStatements). As a result, we completed a quantitative ("step"step 1") fair value measurement of our reporting units during analysis for the May 1, 20162019 goodwill test.analysis for this reporting unit. Consistent with our historical impairment testing of goodwill, fair value of thethis reporting unitsunit was determined based on a weighting of income and market approaches. These approaches require significant judgments including appropriate long-term growth rates and discount rates for the income approach and appropriate multiples of earnings for peer companies and control premiums for the market approach. A qualitative ("step 0") test was completed on May 1, 2018. We assessed various assumptions, events and circumstances that would have affected the estimated fair value of the reporting units in our baseline May 1, 2016 test. The results of this assessment indicated that it is not more likely than not that its reporting unit fair values are less than the reporting unit carrying values and no impairments are necessary.
The discount rates were derived using peer company data compiled with the assistance of a third party valuation services firm. The discount rates used are subject to change based on changes in tax rates at both the state and federal level, debt and equity ratios at each reporting unit and general economic conditions.
The long-term growth rate was derived by evaluating historic growth rates, new business and investment opportunities beyond the near term horizon. The long-term growth rate is subject to change depending on inflationary impacts to
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
the U.S. economy and the individual business environments in which each reporting unit operates.
The MayStep 1 2016 testanalysis performed indicated that the fair value of eachthe Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit exceeds its carrying value. As a result, no impairment charge was recorded as of the May 1, 2019 test date.
Although our annual impairment test is performed during the second quarter, we continue to monitor changes in circumstances that may indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting units is less than the reporting unit carrying value. During the fourth quarter of 2019, in connection with the preparation of the year-end financial statements, we assessed matters related to Columbia of Massachusetts. While there was no single determinative event or factor, the consideration in totality of several factors that carry or are allocated goodwill exceeded theirdeveloped during the fourth quarter of 2019 led us to conclude that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit was below its carrying values, indicating that novalue. These factors included: (i) increased Massachusetts DPU regulatory enforcement activity related to Columbia of Massachusetts during the fourth quarter, including (a) an order imposing work restrictions on Columbia of Massachusetts, impacting Columbia of Massachusetts' infrastructure replacement program, (b) two orders opening public investigations into Columbia of Massachusetts related to the Greater Lawrence Incident and restoration efforts following the incident, and (c) an order defining the scope of the Massachusetts DPU's investigation into the preparation and response of Columbia of Massachusetts related to the incident; (ii) increased uncertainty as to the ability of Columbia of Massachusetts to execute its growth strategy, including utility infrastructure investments, and to obtain timely regulatory outcomes with reasonable rates of return; (iii) further damage to Columbia of Massachusetts' reputation as a result of concerns related to service lines abandoned during the restoration work following the Greater Lawrence Incident and the gas release event in Lawrence, Massachusetts on September 27, 2019; and (iv) a potential sale of the Massachusetts Business. See Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding Massachusetts DPU regulatory enforcement activity and Note 26, "Subsequent Event," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information regarding the potential sale of the Massachusetts Business.
As a result, a new impairment existed under the step 1 annual impairment test. If the estimatesanalysis was required for our Columbia of freeMassachusetts reporting unit. This analysis used a weighted average of income and market approaches for calculating fair value. The income approach calculated discounted cash flows using updated cash flow projections, discount rates and return on equity assumptions. The market approach applied a combination of comparable company multiples and comparable transactions and used updated cash flow projections. While certain assumptions, such as market multiples, remained unchanged in this stepthe year-end test, our cash flow projections, return on equity and rate case timing assumptions were all unfavorably updated at year-end compared to the May 1, analysis had been 10% lower, the resulting fair values would have still been2019 test. The effects of these unfavorable developments were greater than the carryingfavorable change in weighted average cost of capital between the two tests. The year-end impairment analysis indicated that the fair value for each of the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting units tested, holding all other assumptions constant.unit was below its carrying value. As a result, we reduced the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit goodwill balance to zero and recognized a goodwill impairment charge totaling $204.8 million, which is non-deductible for tax purposes.
Our intangible assets, apart from goodwill, consist of franchise rights. Franchise rights were identified as part of the purchase price allocations associated with the acquisition in February 1999 of Columbia of Massachusetts. We review our definite-lived intangible assets for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate its fair value might be below its carrying amount.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, in connection with the preparation of the year-end financial statements, we assessed the changes in circumstances that occurred during the quarter to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value of the franchise rights was below its carrying amount. These factors were the same fourth quarter circumstances outlined in the goodwill impairment discussion above. As a result, we performed a year-end impairment test in which we compared the book value of Columbia of Massachusetts to its undiscounted future cash flow and estimated fair value. With this analysis, we determined that the fair value of the franchise rights was zero. Therefore, we wrote off the entire franchise rights book value, which resulted in an impairment charge totaling $209.7 million. See Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.
Revenue Recognition. Revenue is recorded as products and services are delivered. Utility revenues are billed to customers monthly on a cycle basis. Revenues are recorded on the accrual basis and include estimates for electricity and gas delivered but not billed.
We adopted the provisions of ASC 606 beginning on January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective method, which was applied to all contracts. No material adjustments were made to January 1, 2018 opening balances and no material changes in the amount or timing of future revenue recognition occurred as a result of the adoption of ASC 606. Refer to Note 3 "Revenue Recognition," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Refer to Note 2, "Recent Accounting Pronouncements," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
NISOURCE INC.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk are reported in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Market Risk Disclosures.”
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
NISOURCE INC.
NISOURCE INC.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholdersstockholders and the Board of Directors of NiSource Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of NiSource Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, the related statements of consolidated income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2019, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at itemItem 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 20, 2019,27, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements - Refer to Notes 1, 8, 19, and 26 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
Certain subsidiaries of NiSource Inc. are fully regulated natural gas and electric utility companies serving customers in seven states. These rate-regulated subsidiaries account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the economic effect of the manner in which regulators establish rates, if the rates established are designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and it is probable that such rates can be charged to and collected from customers. Certain expenses and credits subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income are deferred on the consolidated balance sheets and are later recognized in income as the related amounts are included in customer rates and recovered from or refunded to customers.
Through December 31, 2019, the Company invested approximately $258 million of capital spend for the Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement. As of December 31, 2019, the Company determined that a disallowance of the Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement capital expenditures was not probable. On February 26, 2020, the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Columbia of Massachusetts (CMA), agreed to sell substantially all of CMA's utility property, plant, and equipment (including the
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement assets) with other specified assets and liabilities, to a third party. The Company estimates that the total pre-tax loss resulting from this sale will be approximately $360 million, based on December 31, 2019 asset and liability balances and estimated transaction costs.
We identified the accounting for rate-regulated subsidiaries as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management to support its assertions about impacted account balances and disclosures and the high degree of subjectivity involved in assessing the impact of future regulatory orders on the financial statements. Management judgments include assessing (1) the likelihood of recovery in future rates of incurred costs, (2) the likelihood of refund of amounts previously collected from customers, and (3) the probability of recovery of amounts capitalized related to the Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement. Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by regulatory commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the rate making process due its inherent complexities.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the uncertainty of future decisions by regulatory commissions included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of (1) the recovery in future rates of costs incurred as property, plant, and equipment and deferred as regulatory assets, and (2) a refund or a future reduction in rates that should be reported as regulatory liabilities. We also tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the initial recognition of amounts as property, plant, and equipment, including the Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement; regulatory assets or liabilities; and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments, that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates or of a future reduction in rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by regulatory commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates or of a future reduction in rates based on precedence of regulatory commissions’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded regulatory asset and liability balances for completeness.
| |
| • | For regulatory matters in process, including those that could impact the Greater Lawrence Incident pipeline replacement, we inspected the Company’s filings with regulatory commissions and the filings with regulatory commissions by intervenors for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions related to recoverability of recorded assets. |
We inquired of management about property, plant, and equipment that may be abandoned. We inspected minutes of meetings of the board of directors and regulatory orders and other filings with regulatory commissions to identify evidence that may contradict management’s assertion regarding probability of an abandonment.
We obtained an analysis from management regarding probability of recovery for regulatory assets or refund or future reduction in rates for regulatory liabilities not yet addressed in a regulatory order to assess management’s assertion that amounts are probable of recovery or a future reduction in rates.
We evaluated the impact of the February 26, 2020 sale transaction on the carrying value of the Company’s utility property, plant, and equipment as of December 31, 2019.
Impairment of the Franchise Rights Intangible Asset & the Columbia of Massachusetts Reporting Unit Goodwill - Refer to Note 6 to the financial statements
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company assessed the changes in circumstances that occurred during the fourth quarter to determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair values of the long-lived assets (including the franchise rights intangible asset) and goodwill of Columbia of Massachusetts (CMA), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, were below their carrying amount. The totality of several factors led to the Company concluding that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the CMA reporting unit and the value of CMA’s long-lived assets were below their carrying values. These factors included: (1) increased Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU) regulatory enforcement activity related to CMA, including (i) an order imposing work restrictions on CMA, (ii) two orders opening public investigations into CMA related to the Greater Lawrence Incident and restoration efforts following the incident, and (iii) an order defining the scope of the DPU’s investigation into the preparation and response of CMA related to the incident; (2) increased uncertainty as to the ability of CMA to execute its growth strategy, including utility infrastructure
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
investments, and CMA’s ability to obtain timely regulatory outcomes with reasonable rates of return; (3) further damage to CMA’s reputation; and (4) the potential sale of the Company's business in Massachusetts.
The Company performed a long-lived asset impairment test as of December 31, 2019 in which it compared the book value of the CMA asset group to its undiscounted future cash flows and determined that the carrying value of the asset group was not recoverable. The Company estimated the fair value of the CMA asset group using a weighting of income and market approaches and determined that the fair value was less than the carrying value. The resulting impairment loss was allocated to reduce the recorded franchise rights intangible asset to its fair value of zero, which resulted in an impairment charge totaling $209.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company also performed a goodwill impairment test for the CMA reporting unit as of December 31, 2019. As part of this test, the Company estimated CMA’s fair value based on a weighting of income and market approaches. This impairment analysis indicated that the fair value of the CMA reporting unit was below its carrying value and, as a result, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment charge totaling $204.8 million.
We identified the impairment of the franchise rights intangible asset and the CMA reporting unit goodwill as a critical audit matter as there was a high degree of auditor judgment and subjectivity in applying procedures relating to the allocation of impairment to CMA’s long-lived assets and the fair value measurement of the reporting unit. This was driven by significant management judgment when determining fair value, including (1) the weightings of the fair value approaches, (2) the future cash flows used in the impairment tests, and (3) other inputs used in the valuation including comparable company multiples, discount rates, and return on equity. In addition, the audit effort involved the use of fair value specialists to assist in performing audit procedures over these assumptions and evaluating the audit evidence obtained.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the impairment of CMA’s franchise rights intangible asset and CMA reporting unit goodwill included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the impairments, including (1) validation of the assumptions included in the impairment analysis for both the franchise rights intangible asset and goodwill, (2) the evaluation of the methodology used in determining the magnitude of impairment charges as of December 31, 2019, and (3) the verification of the completeness and accuracy of the journal entry made to record the impairments and the related disclosures.
We evaluated the inputs used in the franchise rights intangible asset and goodwill impairment tests, including cash flow projections, scenario analysis, discount rates, return on equity assumptions, and comparable company multiples.
We compared the undiscounted cash flows used in the franchise rights intangible asset impairment test to the carrying value of the asset group to evaluate whether an impairment existed at December 31, 2019.
With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the calculated amount of fair value of the franchise rights intangible asset.
We evaluated the allocation of impairment to the franchise rights intangible asset.
We evaluated the relative weightings of the income and market approaches used to estimate fair value for the purposes of the goodwill impairment test.
We evaluated the reasonableness of the fair value calculated under the combination of income and market approaches by comparing it to the fair value used in the May 1, 2019 goodwill impairment test.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impairment charges.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 201927, 2020
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of NiSource Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of NiSource Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the financial statements as of and for year ended December 31, 2018, of the Company and our report dated February 20, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 20, 2019
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS)
| | Year Ended December 31, (in millions, except per share amounts) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Operating Revenues | | | | | | | | | | |
| Customer revenues | $ | 4,991.1 |
| | $ | 4,730.2 |
| | $ | 4,392.5 |
| $ | 5,053.4 |
| | $ | 4,991.1 |
| | $ | 4,730.2 |
|
| Other revenues | 123.4 |
| | 144.4 |
| | 100.0 |
| 155.5 |
| | 123.4 |
| | 144.4 |
|
| Total Operating Revenues | 5,114.5 |
| | 4,874.6 |
| | 4,492.5 |
| 5,208.9 |
| | 5,114.5 |
| | 4,874.6 |
|
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | | | | | |
| Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization) | 1,761.3 |
| | 1,518.7 |
| | 1,390.2 |
| 1,534.8 |
| | 1,761.3 |
| | 1,518.7 |
|
| Operation and maintenance | 2,352.9 |
| | 1,601.7 |
| | 1,445.8 |
| 1,354.7 |
| | 2,352.9 |
| | 1,601.7 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 599.6 |
| | 570.3 |
| | 547.1 |
| 717.4 |
| | 599.6 |
| | 570.3 |
|
| Loss (Gain) on sale of assets and impairments, net | 1.2 |
| | 5.5 |
| | (1.0 | ) | |
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | | 414.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Loss on sale of fixed assets and impairments, net | | — |
| | 1.2 |
| | 5.5 |
|
| Other taxes | 274.8 |
| | 257.2 |
| | 244.3 |
| 296.8 |
| | 274.8 |
| | 257.2 |
|
| Total Operating Expenses | 4,989.8 |
| | 3,953.4 |
| | 3,626.4 |
| 4,318.2 |
| | 4,989.8 |
| | 3,953.4 |
|
| Operating Income | 124.7 |
| | 921.2 |
| | 866.1 |
| 890.7 |
| | 124.7 |
| | 921.2 |
|
| Other Income (Deductions) | | | | | | | | | | |
| Interest expense, net | (353.3 | ) | | (353.2 | ) | | (349.5 | ) | (378.9 | ) | | (353.3 | ) | | (353.2 | ) |
| Other, net | 43.5 |
| | (13.5 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | (5.2 | ) | | 43.5 |
| | (13.5 | ) |
| Loss on early extinguishment of long-term debt | (45.5 | ) | | (111.5 | ) | | — |
| — |
| | (45.5 | ) | | (111.5 | ) |
| Total Other Deductions, Net | (355.3 | ) | | (478.2 | ) | | (352.5 | ) | (384.1 | ) | | (355.3 | ) | | (478.2 | ) |
| Income (Loss) before Income Taxes | (230.6 | ) | | 443.0 |
| | 513.6 |
| 506.6 |
| | (230.6 | ) | | 443.0 |
|
| Income Taxes | (180.0 | ) | | 314.5 |
| | 182.1 |
| 123.5 |
| | (180.0 | ) | | 314.5 |
|
| Net Income (Loss) | (50.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
| | 331.5 |
| 383.1 |
| | (50.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
|
| Preferred dividends | (15.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| (55.1 | ) | | (15.0 | ) | | — |
|
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders
| (65.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
| | 331.5 |
| 328.0 |
| | (65.6 | ) | | 128.5 |
|
| Earnings (Loss) Per Share | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | 1.03 |
| $ | 0.88 |
| | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
|
| Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
| | $ | 1.02 |
| $ | 0.87 |
| | $ | (0.18 | ) | | $ | 0.39 |
|
| Basic Average Common Shares Outstanding | 356.5 |
| | 329.4 |
| | 321.8 |
| 374.6 |
| | 356.5 |
| | 329.4 |
|
| Diluted Average Common Shares | 356.5 |
| | 330.8 |
| | 323.5 |
| 376.0 |
| | 356.5 |
| | 330.8 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
| | Year Ended December 31, (in millions, net of taxes) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Net Income (Loss) | $ | (50.6 | ) | | $ | 128.5 |
| | $ | 331.5 |
| $ | 383.1 |
| | $ | (50.6 | ) | | $ | 128.5 |
|
| Other comprehensive income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | |
Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities(1) | (2.6 | ) | | 0.8 |
| | (0.1 | ) | 5.7 |
| | (2.6 | ) | | 0.8 |
|
Net unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges(2) | 22.7 |
| | (22.5 | ) | | 8.6 |
| (64.2 | ) | | 22.7 |
| | (22.5 | ) |
Unrecognized pension and OPEB benefit (costs)(3) | (4.4 | ) | | 3.4 |
| | 1.5 |
| 3.1 |
| | (4.4 | ) | | 3.4 |
|
| Total other comprehensive income (loss) | 15.7 |
| | (18.3 | ) | | 10.0 |
| (55.4 | ) | | 15.7 |
| | (18.3 | ) |
| Total Comprehensive Income | $ | (34.9 | ) | | $ | 110.2 |
| | $ | 341.5 |
| |
| Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) | | $ | 327.7 |
| | $ | (34.9 | ) | | $ | 110.2 |
|
(1) Net unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale securities, net of $1.5 million tax expense, $0.6 million tax benefit and $0.4 million tax expense in 2019, 2018 and $0.1 million tax benefit in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
(2) Net unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives qualifying as cash flow hedges, net of $21.2 million tax benefit, $7.5 million tax expense and $13.9 million tax benefit in 2019, 2018 and $5.6 million tax expense in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
(3) Unrecognized pension and OPEB benefit (costs), net of $1.6 million tax expense, $1.5 million tax benefit and $2.1 million tax expense and $0.1 million tax expense in 2019, 2018 and 2017, and 2016, respectively.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | (in millions) | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| ASSETS | | | | | | |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | | | | | | |
| Utility plant | $ | 22,780.8 |
| | $ | 21,026.6 |
| $ | 24,502.6 |
| | $ | 22,780.8 |
|
| Accumulated depreciation and amortization | (7,257.9 | ) | | (6,953.6 | ) | (7,609.3 | ) | | (7,257.9 | ) |
| Net utility plant | 15,522.9 |
| | 14,073.0 |
| 16,893.3 |
| | 15,522.9 |
|
| Other property, at cost, less accumulated depreciation | 19.6 |
| | 286.5 |
| 18.9 |
| | 19.6 |
|
| Net Property, Plant and Equipment | 15,542.5 |
| | 14,359.5 |
| 16,912.2 |
| | 15,542.5 |
|
| Investments and Other Assets | | | | | | |
| Unconsolidated affiliates | 2.1 |
| | 5.5 |
| 1.3 |
| | 2.1 |
|
| Other investments | 204.0 |
| | 204.1 |
| 228.9 |
| | 204.0 |
|
| Total Investments and Other Assets | 206.1 |
| | 209.6 |
| 230.2 |
| | 206.1 |
|
| Current Assets | | | | | | |
| Cash and cash equivalents | 112.8 |
| | 29.0 |
| 139.3 |
| | 112.8 |
|
| Restricted cash | 8.3 |
| | 9.4 |
| 9.1 |
| | 8.3 |
|
| Accounts receivable (less reserve of $21.1 and $18.3, respectively) | 1,058.5 |
| | 898.9 |
| |
| Accounts receivable (less reserve of $19.2 and $21.1, respectively) | | 856.9 |
| | 1,058.5 |
|
| Gas inventory | 286.8 |
| | 285.1 |
| 250.9 |
| | 286.8 |
|
| Materials and supplies, at average cost | 101.0 |
| | 105.9 |
| 120.2 |
| | 101.0 |
|
| Electric production fuel, at average cost | 34.7 |
| | 80.1 |
| 53.6 |
| | 34.7 |
|
| Exchange gas receivable | 88.4 |
| | 45.8 |
| 48.5 |
| | 88.4 |
|
| Regulatory assets | 235.4 |
| | 176.3 |
| 225.7 |
| | 235.4 |
|
| Prepayments and other | 129.5 |
| | 132.8 |
| 149.7 |
| | 129.5 |
|
| Total Current Assets | 2,055.4 |
| | 1,763.3 |
| 1,853.9 |
| | 2,055.4 |
|
| Other Assets | | | | | | |
| Regulatory assets | 2,002.1 |
| | 1,624.9 |
| 2,013.9 |
| | 2,002.1 |
|
| Goodwill | 1,690.7 |
| | 1,690.7 |
| 1,485.9 |
| | 1,690.7 |
|
| Intangible assets, net | 220.7 |
| | 231.7 |
| — |
| | 220.7 |
|
| Deferred charges and other | 86.5 |
| | 82.0 |
| 163.7 |
| | 86.5 |
|
| Total Other Assets | 4,000.0 |
| | 3,629.3 |
| 3,663.5 |
| | 4,000.0 |
|
| Total Assets | $ | 21,804.0 |
| | $ | 19,961.7 |
| $ | 22,659.8 |
| | $ | 21,804.0 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | (in millions, except share amounts) | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2017 | December 31, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES | | | | | | |
| Capitalization | | | | | | |
| Stockholders’ Equity | | | | | | |
| Common stock - $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 372,363,656 and 337,015,806 shares outstanding, respectively | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 3.4 |
| |
| Preferred stock - $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; 420,000 shares outstanding | 880.0 |
| | — |
| |
| Common stock - $0.01 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized; 382,135,680 and 372,363,656 shares outstanding, respectively | | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 3.8 |
|
| Preferred stock - $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized; 440,000 and 420,000 shares outstanding, respectively | | 880.0 |
| | 880.0 |
|
| Treasury stock | (99.9 | ) | | (95.9 | ) | (99.9 | ) | | (99.9 | ) |
| Additional paid-in capital | 6,403.5 |
| | 5,529.1 |
| 6,666.2 |
| | 6,403.5 |
|
| Retained deficit | (1,399.3 | ) | | (1,073.1 | ) | (1,370.8 | ) | | (1,399.3 | ) |
| Accumulated other comprehensive loss | (37.2 | ) | | (43.4 | ) | (92.6 | ) | | (37.2 | ) |
| Total Stockholders’ Equity | 5,750.9 |
| | 4,320.1 |
| 5,986.7 |
| | 5,750.9 |
|
| Long-term debt, excluding amounts due within one year | 7,105.4 |
| | 7,512.2 |
| 7,856.2 |
| | 7,105.4 |
|
| Total Capitalization | 12,856.3 |
| | 11,832.3 |
| 13,842.9 |
| | 12,856.3 |
|
| Current Liabilities | | | | | | |
| Current portion of long-term debt | 50.0 |
| | 284.3 |
| 13.4 |
| | 50.0 |
|
| Short-term borrowings | 1,977.2 |
| | 1,205.7 |
| 1,773.2 |
| | 1,977.2 |
|
| Accounts payable | 883.8 |
| | 625.6 |
| 666.0 |
| | 883.8 |
|
| Customer deposits and credits | 238.9 |
| | 262.6 |
| 256.4 |
| | 238.9 |
|
| Taxes accrued | 222.7 |
| | 208.1 |
| 231.6 |
| | 222.7 |
|
| Interest accrued | 90.7 |
| | 112.3 |
| 99.4 |
| | 90.7 |
|
| Risk management liabilities | 5.0 |
| | 43.2 |
| |
| Exchange gas payable | 85.5 |
| | 59.6 |
| 59.7 |
| | 85.5 |
|
| Regulatory liabilities | 140.9 |
| | 58.7 |
| 160.2 |
| | 140.9 |
|
| Legal and environmental | 18.9 |
| | 32.1 |
| 20.1 |
| | 18.9 |
|
| Accrued compensation and employee benefits | 149.7 |
| | 195.4 |
| 156.3 |
| | 149.7 |
|
| Claims accrued | 114.7 |
| | 12.5 |
| 165.4 |
| | 114.7 |
|
| Other accruals | 58.8 |
| | 78.3 |
| 144.1 |
| | 63.8 |
|
| Total Current Liabilities | 4,036.8 |
| | 3,178.4 |
| 3,745.8 |
| | 4,036.8 |
|
| Other Liabilities | | | | | | |
| Risk management liabilities | 46.7 |
| | 28.5 |
| 134.0 |
| | 46.7 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | 1,330.5 |
| | 1,292.9 |
| 1,485.3 |
| | 1,330.5 |
|
| Deferred investment tax credits | 11.2 |
| | 12.4 |
| 9.7 |
| | 11.2 |
|
| Accrued insurance liabilities | 84.4 |
| | 80.1 |
| 81.5 |
| | 84.4 |
|
| Accrued liability for postretirement and postemployment benefits | 389.1 |
| | 337.1 |
| 373.2 |
| | 389.1 |
|
| Regulatory liabilities | 2,519.1 |
| | 2,736.9 |
| 2,352.0 |
| | 2,519.1 |
|
| Asset retirement obligations | 352.0 |
| | 268.7 |
| 416.9 |
| | 352.0 |
|
| Other noncurrent liabilities | 177.9 |
| | 194.4 |
| 218.5 |
| | 177.9 |
|
| Total Other Liabilities | 4,910.9 |
| | 4,951.0 |
| 5,071.1 |
| | 4,910.9 |
|
| Commitments and Contingencies (Refer to Note 18, "Other Commitments and Contingencies") | — |
| | — |
| |
| Commitments and Contingencies (Refer to Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies") | | — |
| | — |
|
| Total Capitalization and Liabilities | $ | 21,804.0 |
| | $ | 19,961.7 |
| $ | 22,659.8 |
| | $ | 21,804.0 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Operating Activities | | | | | |
| Net Income (Loss) | $ | 383.1 |
| | $ | (50.6 | ) | | $ | 128.5 |
|
| Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash from Operating Activities: | | | | | |
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt | — |
| | 45.5 |
| | 111.5 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 717.4 |
| | 599.6 |
| | 570.3 |
|
| Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | 118.2 |
| | (188.2 | ) | | 306.7 |
|
| Stock compensation expense and 401(k) profit sharing contribution | 25.9 |
| | 28.6 |
| | 40.1 |
|
| Impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets | 414.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of discount/premium on debt | 8.2 |
| | 7.5 |
| | 7.4 |
|
| AFUDC equity | (8.0 | ) | | (14.2 | ) | | (12.6 | ) |
| Other adjustments | (0.9 | ) | | 1.7 |
| | 6.6 |
|
| Changes in Assets and Liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | 187.8 |
| | (186.2 | ) | | (52.3 | ) |
| Inventories | (2.0 | ) | | 41.4 |
| | 19.0 |
|
| Accounts payable | (299.9 | ) | | 268.4 |
| | 49.0 |
|
| Customer deposits and credits | 16.9 |
| | (25.4 | ) | | (2.5 | ) |
| Taxes accrued | 7.3 |
| | 20.2 |
| | 10.2 |
|
| Interest accrued | 8.8 |
| | (21.7 | ) | | (33.9 | ) |
| Exchange gas receivable/payable | 55.5 |
| | (21.5 | ) | | (64.5 | ) |
| Other accruals | 105.3 |
| | 43.5 |
| | 31.8 |
|
| Prepayments and other current assets | (33.6 | ) | | (14.5 | ) | | (13.3 | ) |
| Regulatory assets/liabilities | (85.6 | ) | | (53.2 | ) | | 57.5 |
|
| Postretirement and postemployment benefits | (21.1 | ) | | 58.2 |
| | (380.9 | ) |
| Deferred charges and other noncurrent assets | (76.1 | ) | | 3.8 |
| | (2.0 | ) |
| Other noncurrent liabilities | 61.6 |
| | (2.8 | ) | | (34.4 | ) |
| Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities | 1,583.3 |
| | 540.1 |
| | 742.2 |
|
| Investing Activities | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | (1,802.4 | ) | | (1,818.2 | ) | | (1,695.8 | ) |
| Cost of removal | (113.2 | ) | | (104.3 | ) | | (109.0 | ) |
| Purchases of available-for-sale securities | (140.4 | ) | | (90.0 | ) | | (168.4 | ) |
| Sales of available-for-sale securities | 132.1 |
| | 82.3 |
| | 163.1 |
|
| Other investing activities | 1.5 |
| | 4.1 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| Net Cash Flows used for Investing Activities | (1,922.4 | ) | | (1,926.1 | ) | | (1,808.5 | ) |
| Financing Activities | | | | | |
| Issuance of long-term debt | 750.0 |
| | 350.0 |
| | 3,250.0 |
|
| Repayments of long-term debt and finance lease obligations | (51.6 | ) | | (1,046.1 | ) | | (1,855.0 | ) |
| Issuance of short-term debt (maturity > 90 days) | 600.0 |
| | 950.0 |
| | — |
|
Repayment of short-term debt (maturity > 90 days)
| (700.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Change in short-term borrowings, net (maturity ≤ 90 days) | (104.0 | ) | | (178.5 | ) | | (282.4 | ) |
| Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs | 244.4 |
| | 848.2 |
| | 336.7 |
|
| Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs | — |
| | 880.0 |
| | — |
|
| Equity costs, premiums and other debt related costs | (17.8 | ) | | (46.0 | ) | | (144.3 | ) |
| Acquisition of treasury stock | — |
| | (4.0 | ) | | (7.2 | ) |
| Dividends paid - common stock | (298.5 | ) | | (273.3 | ) | | (229.1 | ) |
| Dividends paid - preferred stock | (56.1 | ) | | (11.6 | ) | | — |
|
| Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities | 366.4 |
| | 1,468.7 |
| | 1,068.7 |
|
| Change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | 27.3 |
| | 82.7 |
| | 2.4 |
|
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | 121.1 |
| | 38.4 |
| | 36.0 |
|
| Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period | $ | 148.4 |
| | $ | 121.1 |
| | $ | 38.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Operating Activities | | | | | |
| Net Income (Loss) | $ | (50.6 | ) | | $ | 128.5 |
| | $ | 331.5 |
|
| Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income (Loss) to Net Cash from Operating Actvities: | | | | | |
| Loss on early extinguishment of debt | 45.5 |
| | 111.5 |
| | — |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | 599.6 |
| | 570.3 |
| | 547.1 |
|
| Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | (188.2 | ) | | 306.7 |
| | 182.3 |
|
| Stock compensation expense and 401(k) profit sharing contribution | 28.6 |
| | 40.1 |
| | 46.5 |
|
| Amortization of discount/premium on debt | 7.5 |
| | 7.4 |
| | 7.6 |
|
| AFUDC equity | (14.2 | ) | | (12.6 | ) | | (11.6 | ) |
| Other adjustments | 1.7 |
| | 6.6 |
| | (7.2 | ) |
| Changes in Assets and Liabilities: | | | | | |
| Accounts receivable | (186.2 | ) | | (52.3 | ) | | (188.0 | ) |
| Inventories | 41.4 |
| | 19.0 |
| | 38.9 |
|
| Accounts payable | 268.4 |
| | 49.0 |
| | 108.8 |
|
| Customer deposits and credits | (25.4 | ) | | (2.5 | ) | | (52.3 | ) |
| Taxes accrued | 20.2 |
| | 10.2 |
| | 12.1 |
|
| Interest accrued | (21.7 | ) | | (33.9 | ) | | (8.7 | ) |
| Exchange gas receivable/payable | (21.5 | ) | | (64.5 | ) | | 36.9 |
|
| Other accruals | 43.5 |
| | 31.8 |
| | (6.0 | ) |
| Prepayments and other current assets | (14.5 | ) | | (13.3 | ) | | (0.4 | ) |
| Regulatory assets/liabilities | (53.2 | ) | | 57.5 |
| | (187.9 | ) |
| Postretirement and postemployment benefits | 58.2 |
| | (380.9 | ) | | (44.8 | ) |
| Deferred charges and other noncurrent assets | 3.8 |
| | (2.0 | ) | | (1.2 | ) |
| Other noncurrent liabilities | (2.8 | ) | | (34.4 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
| Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities | 540.1 |
| | 742.2 |
| | 803.3 |
|
| Investing Activities | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures | (1,818.2 | ) | | (1,695.8 | ) | | (1,475.2 | ) |
| Cost of removal | (104.3 | ) | | (109.0 | ) | | (110.1 | ) |
| Purchases of available-for-sale securities | (90.0 | ) | | (168.4 | ) | | (38.3 | ) |
| Sales of available-for-sale securities | 82.3 |
| | 163.1 |
| | 33.0 |
|
| Other investing activities | 4.1 |
| | 1.6 |
| | (12.4 | ) |
| Net Cash Flows used for Investing Activities | (1,926.1 | ) | | (1,808.5 | ) | | (1,603.0 | ) |
| Financing Activities | | | | | |
| Issuance of long-term debt | 350.0 |
| | 3,250.0 |
| | 500.0 |
|
| Repayments of long-term debt and capital lease obligations | (1,046.1 | ) | | (1,855.0 | ) | | (434.6 | ) |
| Premiums and other debt related costs | (46.0 | ) | | (144.3 | ) | | (3.7 | ) |
| Issuance of short-term debt (maturity > 90 days) | 950.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Change in short-term borrowings, net (maturity ≤ 90 days) | (178.5 | ) | | (282.4 | ) | | 920.6 |
|
| Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs | 848.2 |
| | 336.7 |
| | 23.1 |
|
| Issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs | 880.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Acquisition of treasury stock | (4.0 | ) | | (7.2 | ) | | (9.4 | ) |
| Dividends paid - common stock | (273.3 | ) | | (229.1 | ) | | (205.5 | ) |
| Dividends paid - preferred stock | (11.6 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities | 1,468.7 |
| | 1,068.7 |
| | 790.5 |
|
| Change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | 82.7 |
| | 2.4 |
| | (9.2 | ) |
| Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period | 38.4 |
| | 36.0 |
| | 45.2 |
|
| Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash at End of Period | $ | 121.1 |
| | $ | 38.4 |
| | $ | 36.0 |
|
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Common Stock | | Preferred Stock(1) | | Treasury Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Retained Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total |
| Balance as of January 1, 2017 | $ | 3.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (88.7 | ) | | $ | 5,153.9 |
| | $ | (972.2 | ) | | $ | (25.1 | ) | | $ | 4,071.2 |
|
| Comprehensive Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 128.5 |
| | — |
| | 128.5 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (18.3 | ) | | (18.3 | ) |
| Common stock dividends ($0.70 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (229.4 | ) | | — |
| | (229.4 | ) |
| Treasury stock acquired | — |
| | — |
| | (7.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7.2 | ) |
| Stock issuances: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14.9 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34.3 |
|
| Dividend reinvestment plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6.4 |
|
| ATM Program | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 314.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 314.7 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (95.9 | ) | | $ | 5,529.1 |
| | $ | (1,073.1 | ) | | $ | (43.4 | ) | | $ | 4,320.1 |
|
| Comprehensive Loss: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (50.6 | ) | | — |
| | (50.6 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.7 |
| | 15.7 |
|
| Dividends | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock ($0.78 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (273.5 | ) | | — |
| | (273.5 | ) |
| Preferred stock ($28.88 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.6 | ) | | — |
| | (11.6 | ) |
| Treasury stock acquired | — |
| | — |
| | (4.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4.0 | ) |
| Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9.5 |
| | (9.5 | ) | | — |
|
| Stock issuances: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Common stock - private placement | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 599.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 599.6 |
|
| Preferred stock | — |
| | 880.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 880.0 |
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.5 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.4 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21.8 |
|
| ATM Program | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 232.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 232.5 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2018 | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 880.0 |
| | $ | (99.9 | ) | | $ | 6,403.5 |
| | $ | (1,399.3 | ) | | $ | (37.2 | ) | | $ | 5,750.9 |
|
| Comprehensive Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 383.1 |
| | — |
| | 383.1 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (55.4 | ) | | (55.4 | ) |
| Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock ($0.80 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (298.5 | ) | | — |
| | (298.5 | ) |
| Preferred stock (See Note 12) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (56.1 | ) | | — |
| | (56.1 | ) |
| Stock issuances: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.6 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10.4 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 17.6 |
|
| ATM program | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 229.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 229.1 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2019 | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 880.0 |
| | $ | (99.9 | ) | | $ | 6,666.2 |
| | $ | (1,370.8 | ) | | $ | (92.6 | ) | | $ | 5,986.7 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Common Stock | | Treasury Stock | | Additional Paid-In Capital | | Retained Deficit | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss | | Total |
| Balance as of January 1, 2016 | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | (79.3 | ) | | $ | 5,078.0 |
| | $ | (1,123.3 | ) | | $ | (35.1 | ) | | $ | 3,843.5 |
|
| Comprehensive Income: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 331.5 |
| | — |
| | 331.5 |
|
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 10.0 |
| | 10.0 |
|
| Common stock dividends ($0.64 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (205.7 | ) | | — |
| | (205.7 | ) |
| Treasury stock acquired | — |
| | (9.4 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (9.4 | ) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 25.3 |
| | — |
| | 25.3 |
|
| Stock issuances: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | — |
| | 4.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 4.7 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | — |
| | 20.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 20.9 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing | — |
| | — |
| | 41.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 41.4 |
|
| Dividend reinvestment plan | — |
| | — |
| | 8.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 8.9 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | 3.3 |
| | $ | (88.7 | ) | | $ | 5,153.9 |
| | $ | (972.2 | ) | | $ | (25.1 | ) | | $ | 4,071.2 |
|
| Comprehensive Loss: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 128.5 |
| | — |
| | 128.5 |
|
| Other comprehensive loss, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (18.3 | ) | | (18.3 | ) |
| Common stock dividends ($0.70 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (229.4 | ) | | — |
| | (229.4 | ) |
| Treasury stock acquired | — |
| | (7.2 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (7.2 | ) |
| Stock issuances: | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | — |
| | 14.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 14.9 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing | — |
| | — |
| | 34.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 34.3 |
|
| Dividend reinvestment plan | — |
| | — |
| | 6.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 6.4 |
|
| ATM Program | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | 314.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 314.7 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | (95.9 | ) | | $ | 5,529.1 |
| | $ | (1,073.1 | ) | | $ | (43.4 | ) | | $ | 4,320.1 |
|
(1)Series A and Series B shares have an aggregate liquidation preference of $400M and $500M, respectively. See Note 2, "Recent Accounting Pronouncements,"12, "Equity" for additional information.
The accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Preferred | | Common |
| (in thousands) | Shares | | Shares | | Treasury | | Outstanding |
| Balance as of January 1, 2017 | — |
| | 326,664 |
| | (3,504 | ) | | 323,160 |
|
| Treasury stock acquired | — |
| | — |
| | (293 | ) | | (293 | ) |
| Issued: | | | | | | | |
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 207 |
| | — |
| | 207 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | 351 |
| | — |
| | 351 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing plan | — |
| | 1,396 |
| | — |
| | 1,396 |
|
| Dividend reinvestment plan | — |
| | 264 |
| | — |
| | 264 |
|
| ATM program | — |
| | 11,931 |
| | — |
| | 11,931 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | — |
| | 340,813 |
| | (3,797 | ) | | 337,016 |
|
| Treasury stock acquired | — |
| | — |
| | (166 | ) | | (166 | ) |
| Issued: | | | | | | | |
| Common stock - private placement | — |
| | 24,964 |
| | — |
| | 24,964 |
|
| Preferred stock | 420 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 223 |
| | — |
| | 223 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | 561 |
| | — |
| | 561 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing plan | — |
| | 882 |
| | — |
| | 882 |
|
| ATM Program | — |
| | 8,883 |
| | — |
| | 8,883 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2018 | 420 |
| | 376,326 |
| | (3,963 | ) | | 372,363 |
|
| Issued: | | | | | | | |
Preferred stock(1) | 20 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 201 |
| | — |
| | 201 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | 518 |
| | — |
| | 518 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing plan | — |
| | 631 |
| | — |
| | 631 |
|
| ATM program | — |
| | 8,423 |
| | — |
| | 8,423 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2019 | 440 |
| | 386,099 |
| | (3,963 | ) | | 382,136 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Common
Stock | | Preferred Stock | | Treasury
Stock | | Additional
Paid-In
Capital | | Retained Deficit | | Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Loss | | Total |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | $ | 3.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (95.9 | ) | | $ | 5,529.1 |
| | $ | (1,073.1 | ) | | $ | (43.4 | ) | | $ | 4,320.1 |
|
| Comprehensive Income: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Net Loss | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (50.6 | ) | | — |
| | (50.6 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income, net of tax | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.7 |
| | 15.7 |
|
| Dividends: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock ($0.78 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (273.5 | ) | | — |
| | (273.5 | ) |
| Preferred stock ($28.88 per share) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (11.6 | ) | | — |
| | (11.6 | ) |
| Treasury stock acquired | — |
| | — |
| | (4.0 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | (4.0 | ) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle(1) | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 9.5 |
| | (9.5 | ) | | — |
|
| Stock issuances: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Common stock - private placement | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 599.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 599.6 |
|
| Preferred stock | — |
| | 880.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 880.0 |
|
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 5.5 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 15.4 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 21.8 |
|
| ATM program | 0.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 232.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 232.5 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2018 | $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 880.0 |
| | $ | (99.9 | ) | | $ | 6,403.5 |
| | $ | (1,399.3 | ) | | $ | (37.2 | ) | | $ | 5,750.9 |
|
(1)See Note 2, "Recent Accounting Pronouncements," for additional information.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Preferred | | Common |
| (in thousands) | Shares | | Shares | | Treasury | | Outstanding |
| Balance as of January 1, 2016 | — |
| | 322,181 |
| | (3,071 | ) | | 319,110 |
|
| Treasury stock acquired | | | | | (433 | ) | | (433 | ) |
| Issued: | | | | | | | |
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 201 |
| | — |
| | 201 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | 2,103 |
| | — |
| | 2,103 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing plan | — |
| | 1,793 |
| | — |
| | 1,793 |
|
| Dividend reinvestment plan | — |
| | 386 |
| | — |
| | 386 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | — |
| | 326,664 |
| | (3,504 | ) | | 323,160 |
|
| Treasury stock acquired | | | | | (293 | ) | | (293 | ) |
| Issued: | | | | | | | |
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 207 |
| | — |
| | 207 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | 351 |
| | — |
| | 351 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing plan | — |
| | 1,396 |
| | — |
| | 1,396 |
|
| Dividend reinvestment plan | — |
| | 264 |
| | — |
| | 264 |
|
| ATM Program | — |
| | 11,931 |
| | — |
| | 11,931 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | — |
| | 340,813 |
| | (3,797 | ) | | 337,016 |
|
| Treasury stock acquired | | | | | (166 | ) | | (166 | ) |
| Issued: | | | | | | | |
Common stock - private placement(1) | — |
| | 24,964 |
| | — |
| | 24,964 |
|
Preferred stock(1) | 420 |
| | | | | | |
| Employee stock purchase plan | — |
| | 223 |
| | — |
| | 223 |
|
| Long-term incentive plan | — |
| | 561 |
| | — |
| | 561 |
|
| 401(k) and profit sharing plan | — |
| | 882 |
| | — |
| | 882 |
|
| ATM program | — |
| | 8,883 |
| | — |
| | 8,883 |
|
| Balance as of December 31, 2018 | 420 |
| | 376,326 |
| | (3,963 | ) | | 372,363 |
|
(1)See Note 12, "Equity," for additional information.
Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
| |
1. | 1. Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
A. Company Structure and Principles of Consolidation. We are an energy holding company incorporated in Delaware and headquartered in Merrillville, Indiana. Our subsidiaries are fully regulated natural gas and electric utility companies serving approximately 4.0 million customers in seven states. We generate substantially all of our operating income through these rate-regulated businesses. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of us and our majority-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of all intercompany accounts and transactions.
On February 26, 2020, NiSource and Columbia of Massachusetts entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Eversource, a Massachusetts voluntary association. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement, NiSource and Columbia of Massachusetts agreed to sell to Eversource, with certain additions and exceptions, (1) substantially all of the assets of Columbia of Massachusetts and (2) all of the assets held by any of Columbia of Massachusetts’ affiliates that primarily relate to the business of storing, distributing or transporting natural gas to residential, commercial and industrial customers in Massachusetts, as conducted by Columbia of Massachusetts, and Eversource agreed to assume certain liabilities of Columbia of Massachusetts and its affiliates. For additional information, see Note 26, “Subsequent Event.”
B. Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
C. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash. We consider all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. We report amounts deposited in brokerage accounts for margin requirements as restricted cash. In addition, we have amounts deposited in trust to satisfy requirements for the provision of various property, liability, workers compensation, and long-term disability insurance, which is classified as restricted cash on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and disclosed with cash and cash equivalents on the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.
D. Accounts Receivable and Unbilled Revenue. Accounts receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets includes both billed and unbilled amounts. Unbilled amounts of accounts receivable relate to a portion of a customer’s consumption of gas or electricity from the date of the last cycle billing date through the last day of the month (balance sheet date). Factors taken into consideration when estimating unbilled revenue include historical usage, customer rates and weather. Accounts receivable fluctuates from year to year depending in large part on weather impacts and price volatility. Our accounts receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets include unbilled revenue, less reserves, in the amounts of $324.2$350.5 million and $359.4$324.2 million as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. The reserve for uncollectible receivables is our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the existing accounts receivable. We determined the reserve based on historical experience and in consideration of current market conditions. Account balances are charged against the allowance when it is anticipated the receivable will not be recovered. Refer to Note 3, "Revenue Recognition," for additional information on customer-related accounts receivable.
E. Investments in Debt Securities. Our investments in debt securities are carried at fair value and are designated as available-for-sale. These investments are included within “Other investments” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Unrealized gains and losses, net of deferred income taxes, are recorded to accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. These investments are monitored for other than temporary declines in market value. Realized gains and losses and permanent impairments are reflected in the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss). NoNaN material impairment charges were recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 or 2016.2017. Refer to Note 16,17, "Fair Value," for additional information.
F. Basis of Accounting for Rate-Regulated Subsidiaries. Rate-regulated subsidiaries account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the economic effect of the way in which regulators establish rates, if the rates established are designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and it is probable that such rates can be charged and collected. Certain expenses and credits subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income are deferred on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are later recognized in income as the related amounts are included in customer rates and recovered from or refunded to customers.
In the event that regulation significantly changes the opportunity for us to recover our costs in the future, all or a portion of our regulated operations may no longer meet the criteria for regulatory accounting. In such an event, a write-down of all or a portion of our existing regulatory assets and liabilities could result. If transition cost recovery was approved by the appropriate regulatory bodies that would meet the requirements under GAAP for continued accounting as regulatory assets and liabilities during such recovery period, the regulatory assets and liabilities would be reported at the recoverable amounts. If unable to continue to apply
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
the provisions of regulatory accounting, we would be required to apply the provisions of ASC 980-20, Discontinuation of Rate-Regulated Accounting. In management’s opinion, our regulated subsidiaries will be subject to regulatory accounting for the foreseeable future. Refer to Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
G. Plant and Other Property and Related Depreciation and Maintenance. Property, plant and equipment (principally utility plant) is stated at cost. The rate-regulated subsidiaries record depreciation using composite rates on a straight-line basis over the remaining service lives of the electric, gas and common properties as approved by the appropriate regulators.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Non-utility property is generally depreciated on a straight-line basis over the life of the associated asset. Refer to Note 5, "Property, Plant and Equipment," for additional information related to depreciation expense.
For rate-regulated companies, AFUDC is capitalized on all classes of property except organization costs, land, autos, office equipment, tools and other general property purchases. The allowance is applied to construction costs for that period of time between the date of the expenditure and the date on which such project is placed in service. Our pre-tax rate for AFUDC was 3.0% in 2019, 3.5% in 2018 and 4.0% in 2017 and 4.5% in 2016.2017.
Generally, our subsidiaries follow the practice of charging maintenance and repairs, including the cost of removal of minor items of property, to expense as incurred. When our subsidiaries retire regulated property, plant and equipment, original cost plus the cost of retirement, less salvage value, is charged to accumulated depreciation. However, when it becomes probable a regulated asset will be retired substantially in advance of its original expected useful life or is abandoned, the cost of the asset and the corresponding accumulated depreciation is recognized as a separate asset. If the asset is still in operation, the net amount is classified as "Other property, at cost, less accumulated depreciation" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. If the asset is no longer operating, the net amount is classified in "Regulatory assets" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. If we are able to recover a full return of and on investment, the carrying value of the asset is based on historical cost. If we are not able to recover a full return on investment, a loss on impairment is recognized to the extent the net book value of the asset exceeds the present value of future revenues discounted at the incremental borrowing rate.
When our subsidiaries sell entire regulated operating units, or retire or sell nonregulated properties, the original cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization balances are removed from "Property, Plant and Equipment" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any gain or loss is recorded in earnings, unless otherwise required by the applicable regulatory body. Refer to Note 5, "Property, Plant and Equipment," for further information.
External and internal costs associated with computer software developed for internal use are capitalized. Capitalization of such costs commences upon the completion of the preliminary stage of each project. Once the installed software is ready for its intended use, such capitalized costs are amortized on a straight-line basis generally over a period of five years, except for certain significant enterprise-wide technology investments which are amortized over a ten-year period.
External and internal up-front implementation costs associated with cloud computing arrangements that are service contracts are deferred on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Once the installed software is ready for its intended use, such deferred costs are amortized on a straight-line basis to "Operation and maintenance," over the minimum term of the contract plus contractually-provided renewal periods that are reasonable expected to be exercised -- generally up to a maximum of five years.
H. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. Substantially all of our goodwill relates to the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired in the Columbia acquisition on November 1, 2000. We test our goodwill for impairment annually as of May 1, or more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that goodwill might be impaired. Fair value of our reporting units is determined using a combination of income and market approaches.
We havehad other intangible assets consisting primarily of franchise rights apart from goodwill that were identified as part of the purchase price allocations associated with the acquisition of Columbia of Massachusetts, which iswere being amortized on a straight-line basis over forty years from the date of acquisition.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, we impaired goodwill and intangible assets related to Columbia of Massachusetts. See Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," for additional information.
I. Accounts Receivable Transfer Program. Certain of our subsidiaries have agreements with third parties to transfer certain accounts receivable without recourse. These transfers of accounts receivable are accounted for as secured borrowings. The entire gross receivables balance remains on the December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 Consolidated Balance Sheets and short-term debt is recorded
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
in the amount of proceeds received from the transferees involved in the transactions. Refer to Note 17,18, "Transfers of Financial Assets," for further information.
J. Gas Cost and Fuel Adjustment Clause. Our regulated subsidiaries defer most differences between gas and fuel purchase costs and the recovery of such costs in revenues, and adjust future billings for such deferrals on a basis consistent with applicable state-approved tariff provisions. These deferred balances are recorded as "Regulatory assets" or "Regulatory liabilities," as appropriate, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Refer to Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
K. Inventory. Both the LIFO inventory methodology and the weighted average cost methodology are used to value natural gas in storage, as approved by regulators for all of our regulated subsidiaries. Inventory valued using LIFO was $47.5$47.2 million and $45.5$47.5 million at December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. Based on the average cost of gas using the LIFO method, the estimated
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
replacement cost of gas in storage was less than the stated LIFO cost by $12.2$25.5 million and $17.4$12.2 million at December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. Gas inventory valued using the weighted average cost methodology was $203.7 million at December 31, 2019 and $239.3 million at December 31, 2018 and $239.6 million at December 31, 2017.2018.
Electric production fuel is valued using the weighted average cost inventory methodology, as approved by NIPSCO's regulator.
Materials and supplies are valued using the weighted average cost inventory methodology.
L. Accounting for Exchange and Balancing Arrangements of Natural Gas. Our Gas Distribution Operations segment enters into balancing and exchange arrangements of natural gas as part of its operations and off-system sales programs. We record a receivable or payable for any of our respective cumulative gas imbalances, as well as for any gas inventory borrowed or lent under a Gas Distribution Operations exchange agreement. Exchange gas is valued based on individual regulatory jurisdiction requirements (for example, historical spot rate, spot at the beginning of the month). These receivables and payables are recorded as “Exchange gas receivable” or “Exchange gas payable” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, as appropriate.
M. Accounting for Risk Management Activities. We account for our derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with ASC 815. We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value, unless such contracts are exempted as a normal purchase normal sale under the provisions of the standard. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and resulting designation.
We have elected not to net fair value amounts for any of our derivative instruments or the fair value amounts recognized for the right to receive cash collateral or obligation to pay cash collateral arising from those derivative instruments recognized at fair value, which are executed with the same counterparty under a master netting arrangement. See Note 9, "Risk Management Activities," for additional information.
N. Income Taxes and Investment Tax Credits. We record income taxes to recognize full interperiod tax allocations.Under the asset and liability method, deferred income taxes are provided for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amount and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. Previously recorded investmentInvestment tax credits of theassociated with regulated subsidiaries wereoperations are deferred on the balance sheet and are being amortized as a reduction to book income tax expense over the regulatory lifeestimated useful lives of the related properties to conform to regulatory policy.properties.
To the extent certain deferred income taxes of the regulated companies are recoverable or payable through future rates, regulatory assets and liabilities have been established. Regulatory assets for income taxes are primarily attributable to property-related tax timing differences for which deferred taxes had not been provided in the past, when regulators did not recognize such taxes as costs in the rate-making process. Regulatory liabilities for income taxes are primarily attributable to the regulated companies’ obligation to refund to ratepayers deferred income taxes provided at rates higher than the current Federal income tax rate. Such property-related amounts are credited to ratepayers using either the average rate assumption method or the reverse South Georgia method. Non property-related amounts are credited to ratepayers consistent with state utility commission direction.
Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code and relevant state taxing authorities, we and our subsidiaries file consolidated income tax returns for federal and certain state jurisdictions. We and our subsidiaries are parties to an agreement (the “Intercompanya tax sharing agreement. Income Tax Allocation Agreement”) that provides for the allocation of consolidated tax liabilities. The Intercompany Income Tax Allocation Agreement generally provides thattaxes recorded by each party is allocated an amount of tax similar torepresent amounts that which would be owed had the party been separately subject to tax.
O. Environmental Expenditures. We accrue for costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when the incurrence of such costs is probable and the amounts can be reasonably estimated, regardless of when the expenditures are actually made. The undiscounted estimated future expenditures are based on currently enacted laws and regulations, existing technology and estimated site-specific costs where assumptions may be made about the nature and extent of site contamination, the extent of
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
cleanup efforts, costs of alternative cleanup methods and other variables. The liability is adjusted as further information is discovered or circumstances change. The accruals for estimated environmental expenditures are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in “Legal and environmental” for short-term portions of these liabilities and “Other noncurrent liabilities” for the respective long-term portions of these liabilities. Rate-regulated subsidiaries applying regulatory accounting establish regulatory assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets to the extent that future recovery of environmental remediation costs is probable through the regulatory process. Refer to Note 18,19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies," for further information.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
P. Excise Taxes. We account As an agent for some state and local governments, we invoice and collect certain excise taxes that are customer liabilitieslevied by separately statingstate and local governments on our invoices the tax to our customers and recordingrecord these amounts invoiced as liabilities payable to the applicable taxing jurisdiction. Such balances are presented within "Other accruals" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These types of taxes collected from customers, comprised largely of sales taxes, are presented on a net basis affecting neither revenues nor cost of sales. We account for excise taxes for which we are liable by recording a liability for the expected tax with a corresponding charge to “Other taxes” expense on the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss).
Q. Accrued Insurance Liabilities. We accrue for insurance costs related to workers compensation, automobile, property, general and employment practices liabilities based on the most probable value of each claim. In general, claim values are determined by professional, licensed loss adjusters who consider the facts of the claim, anticipated indemnification and legal expenses, and respective state rules. Claims are reviewed by us at least quarterly and an adjustment is made to the accrual based on the most current information. Refer to Note 18-E19-E "Other Matters" for further information on accrued insurance liabilities related to the Greater Lawrence Incident.
| |
2. | 2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
We are currently evaluating the impact of certain ASUs on our Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, which are described below:
|
| | | |
| Standard | Description | Effective Date | Effect on the financial statements or other significant matters |
ASU 2018-14, Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans | The pronouncement modifies the disclosure requirements for defined benefit pension andor other postretirement benefit plans. The guidance removes disclosures that are no longer considered cost beneficial, clarifies the specific requirements of disclosures and adds disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The modifications affect annual period disclosures and must be applied on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. | Annual periods ending after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. | We are currently evaluating the effects of this pronouncement on our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We expect to adopt this ASU on its effective date.
|
ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes | This pronouncement simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the general principles in ASC 740, income taxes. It also improves consistency of application for other areas of the guidance by clarifying and amending existing guidance. | Annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted. | We are currently evaluating the effects of this pronouncement on our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. We tentatively expect to adopt this ASU on its effective date. |
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
|
| |
| Standard | Adoption |
ASU 2016-13, 2019-01, Leases (Topic 842): Codification Improvements | See Note 16, "Leases," for our discussion of the effects of implementing these standards. |
ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements |
ASU 2018-01, Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842 |
ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) |
ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses, (Topic 326)Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments | The pronouncement changesIn June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 that revised the guidance on the impairment model forof most financial assets replacingand certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. This ASU replaces the current "incurred loss" model. ASU 2016-13 will require the use ofmodel with an "expected loss" model for instruments measured at amortized cost. It will also requirerequires entities to record allowances for available-for-sale debt securities rather than impair the carrying amount of the securities. Subsequent improvements to the estimated credit losses of available-for-sale securities will be recognized immediately in earnings instead of over time as they are under historic guidance. | Annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018.
| We maintain investments in U.S. Treasury, corporate and mortgage-backed debt securities, which are pledged as collateral for trust accounts related to our wholly-owned insurance company. These debt securities are classified as available for sale. We also have recorded balances for trade receivables that fall within the scope of the standard. We are currently evaluating the impact of adoption, if any, on our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements |
| |
Standard | Adoption |
ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other— Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract
| In August 2018, the FASB issued this ASU, which amends current guidance to align the accounting for costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing costs associated with developing or obtaining internal-use software.
We elected to early adopt the ASU on a prospective basis, effective October 1, 2018. As a result of adopting this ASU, we will defer onto the Consolidated Balance Sheets up-front implementation costs of cloud computing arrangements if they would have been capitalized in a similar on-premise software solution.
|
ASU 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
| We adopted this ASU effective March 31, 2018. Upon adoption, $9.5 million of tax effects that were stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a result of the implementation of the TCJA were reclassified to retained deficit. This change is reflected on our Statements of Consolidated Stockholders' Equity.
|
ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments (a consensus of the Emerging Issues Task Force)
| We adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2018. The adoption2020, using a modified retrospective method. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements or NotesStatements. No material adjustments were made to Consolidated Financial Statements. |
ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements | We adopted theJanuary 1, 2020 opening balances as a result of adoption. For our investments that are classified as available for sale debt securities, we will recognize impairment using an allowance approach instead of an 'other than temporary' impairment (OTTI) model. Since we do not have amounts previously recognized in other comprehensive income related to previous OTTI charges, provisions of this ASU are adopted prospectively. In regards to our recorded balances of trade receivables that fall within the scope of this ASU, the ASU did not result in any significant modifications to our policies related to recognizing an allowance on our trade receivables. Based on shared risk characteristics, we segregate our trade receivables into separate pools. We will apply separate models to calculate reserves for uncollectible receivables, as well as consider factors other than time to determine whether a credit loss exists. ASC 842 beginning on January 1, 2019, using the transition method provided in ASU 2018-11, which was applied to all existing leases at that date. As such, results for326 also prescribes additional presentation and disclosure requirements. For reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2019 will be presented under ASC 842, while prior period amounts will continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 840. To ease the process of implementing ASC 842, we elected a number of practical expedients, including the "practical expedient package" described in ASC 842-10-65-1 and the provisions of ASU 2018-01, which allows us to not evaluate existing land easements under ASC 842. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. As such, for those leases with terms less than 12 months,2020, we will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities. Further, ASC 842 provides lessees the optioninclude additional disclosures in our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements based on qualitative and quantitative assessment of electing an accounting policy, by class of underlying asset, in which the lessee may choose not to separate nonlease components from lease components. We elected this practical expedient for our leases of fleet vehicles and railcars. We also elected to use a practical expedient that allows the use of hindsight in determining lease terms when evaluating leases that existed at the implementation date.
We are the lessee for substantially all of our current leasing activity. Upon adopting ASC 842 we began recognizing right-of-use assets and liabilities associated with operating leases (other than short term operating leases) on our Consolidated Balance Sheets resulting in an increase in assets and liabilities of approximately $60 million. The adoption of ASC 842 did not have a material impact to our results of operations or cash flows. We have implemented key system functionality and internal controls to facilitate the preparation of financial information upon adoption. Our SEC filings will include expanded disclosures to comply with the provisions of ASC 842 beginning with our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2019.
|
ASU 2018-01, Leases (Topic 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842 |
ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) |
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
|
| |
Standard | Adoption |
ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients
| See Note 3, "Revenue Recognition," for our discussion of the effects of implementing these standards. |
ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerationsmateriality.
|
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 606)326) |
We also adopted ASU 2017-07, Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, effective January 1, 2018. We continue to present the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost within "Operation and maintenance;" however, other components of the net periodic benefit cost (including regulatory deferrals and settlement charges) are now presented separately within "Other, net" on our Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss).
Changes in income statement presentation were implemented on a retrospective basis. The impact of this ASU on previously issued annual financial statements is summarized in the tables below:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2016 (in millions) | | As Previously Reported | | Effect of Change(1) | | As Adjusted |
| Operation and maintenance | | $ | 1,453.7 |
| | $ | (7.9 | ) | | $ | 1,445.8 |
|
| Total Operating Expenses | | 3,634.3 |
| | (7.9 | ) | | 3,626.4 |
|
| Operating Income | | 858.2 |
| | 7.9 |
| | 866.1 |
|
| Other Income (Deductions) | | | | | | |
| Other, net | | 1.5 |
| | (7.9 | ) | | (6.4 | ) |
| Total Other Deductions | | $ | (348.0 | ) | | $ | (7.9 | ) | | $ | (355.9 | ) |
(1) The effect of this change is attributable to our business segments: Gas Distribution Operations, Electric Operations, and Corporate and Other in the amounts of $4.3 million, $(9.8) million, and $(2.4) million, respectively.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2017 (in millions) | | As Previously Reported | | Effect of Change(1) | | As Adjusted |
| Operation and maintenance | | $ | 1,612.3 |
| | $ | (10.6 | ) | | $ | 1,601.7 |
|
| Total Operating Expenses | | 3,964.0 |
| | (10.6 | ) | | 3,953.4 |
|
| Operating Income | | 910.6 |
| | 10.6 |
| | 921.2 |
|
| Other Income (Deductions) | | | | | | |
| Other, net | | (2.8 | ) | | (10.6 | ) | | (13.4 | ) |
| Total Other Deductions | | $ | (467.5 | ) | | $ | (10.6 | ) | | $ | (478.1 | ) |
(1) The effect of this change is attributable to our business segments: Gas Distribution Operations, Electric Operations, and Corporate and Other in the amounts of $(4.4) million, $(2.6) million, and $(3.6) million, respectively.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
3. Revenue Recognition
ASC 606 Adoption.In 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606). ASU 2014-09 outlines a single, comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. The core principle of the new standard is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations, and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (ASC 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. We adopted the provisions of ASC 606 beginning on January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective method, which was applied to all contracts. No material adjustments were made to January 1, 2018 opening balances as a result of the adoption. As required under the modified retrospective method of adoption, results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under ASC 606, while prior period amounts are not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 605.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The table below provides results for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 as if it had been prepared under historic accounting guidance. We included operating revenue information for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 for comparability.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Operating Revenues | | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution | | $ | 2,336.1 |
| | $ | 2,348.4 |
| | $ | 2,063.2 |
|
| Gas Transportation | | 1,171.3 |
| | 1,055.2 |
| | 1,021.5 |
|
| Electric | | 1,698.5 |
| | 1,707.4 |
| | 1,785.5 |
|
| Other | | 3.0 |
| | 3.5 |
| | 4.4 |
|
| Total Operating Revenues | | $ | 5,208.9 |
| | $ | 5,114.5 |
| | $ | 4,874.6 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Operating Revenues | | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution | | $ | 2,348.4 |
| | $ | 2,063.2 |
| | $ | 1,850.9 |
|
| Gas Transportation | | 1,055.2 |
| | 1,021.5 |
| | 964.6 |
|
| Electric | | 1,707.4 |
| | 1,785.5 |
| | 1,660.8 |
|
| Other | | 3.5 |
| | 4.4 |
| | 16.2 |
|
| Total Operating Revenues | | $ | 5,114.5 |
| | $ | 4,874.6 |
| | $ | 4,492.5 |
|
Beginning in 2018 with the adoption of ASC 606, the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) disaggregates “Customer revenues” (i.e. ASC 606 Revenues) from “Other revenues,” both of which are discussed in more detail below.
Customer Revenues. Substantially all of our revenues are tariff-based, which we have concluded is within the scope of ASC 606. Under ASC 606, the recipients of our utility service meet the definition of a customer, while the operating company tariffs represent an agreement that meets the definition of a contract. ASC 606 defines a contract as an agreement between two or more parties, in this case us and the customer, which creates enforceable rights and obligations. In order to be considered a contract, we have determined that it is probable that substantially all of the consideration to which we are entitled from customers will be collected upon satisfaction of performance obligations. We maintain common utility credit risk mitigation practices, including requiring deposits and actively pursuing collection of past due amounts. In addition, our regulated operations utilize certain regulatory mechanisms that facilitate recovery of bad debt costs within tariff-based rates, which provides further evidence of collectibility.
Customers in certain of our jurisdictions participate in programs that allow for a fixed payment each month regardless of usage. Payments received that exceed the value of gas or electricity actually delivered are recorded as a liability and presented in "Customer Deposits and Credits."Credits" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Amounts in this account are reduced and revenue is recorded when customer usage begins to exceed payments received.
We have identified our performance obligations created under tariff-based sales as 1) the commodity (natural gas or electricity, which includes generation and capacity) and 2) delivery. These commodities are sold and / or delivered to and generally consumed by customers simultaneously, leading to satisfaction of our performance obligations over time as gas or electricity is delivered to customers. Due to the at-will nature of utility customers, performance obligations are limited to the services requested and received to date. Once complete, we generally maintain no additional performance obligations.
Transaction prices for each performance obligation are generally prescribed by each operating company’s respective tariff. Rates include provisions to adjust billings for fluctuations in fuel and purchased power costs and cost of natural gas. Revenues are adjusted for differences between actual costs subject to reconciliation and the amounts billed in current rates. Under or over recovered revenues related to these cost recovery mechanisms are included in regulatory assets"Regulatory Assets" or liabilities"Regulatory Liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are recovered from or returned to customers through adjustments to tariff rates. As we provide and deliver service to customers, revenue is recognized based on the transaction price allocated to each performance obligation. In general,
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
revenue recognized from tariff-based sales is equivalent to the value of natural gas or electricity supplied and billed each period, in addition to an estimate for deliveries completed during the period but not yet billed to the customer.
In addition to tariff-based sales, our Gas Distribution Operations segment enters into balancing and exchange arrangements of natural gas as part of our operations and off-system sales programs. We have concluded that these sales are within the scope of ASC 606. Performance obligations for these types of sales include transportation and storage of natural gas and can be satisfied at a point in time or over a period of time, depending on the specific transaction. For those transactions that span a period of time, we record a receivable or payable for any cumulative gas imbalances, as well as for any gas inventory borrowed or lent under a Gas Distributions Operations exchange agreement.
Revenue Disaggregation and Reconciliation. We disaggregate revenue from contracts with customers based upon reportable segment as well as by customer class. As our revenues are primarily earned over a period of time, and we do not earn a material amount of revenues at a point in time, revenues are not disaggregated as such below. The Gas Distribution Operations segment provides natural gas service and transportation for residential, commercial and industrial customers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia,
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Kentucky, Maryland, Indiana and Massachusetts. The Electric Operations segment provides electric service in 20 counties in the northern part of Indiana.
The table below reconciles revenue disaggregation by customer class to segment revenue as well as to revenues reflected on the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss):
| | Year Ended December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Gas Distribution Operations | | Electric Operations | | Corporate and Other | | Total | |
| Year Ended December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Gas Distribution Operations | | Electric Operations | | Corporate and Other | | Total |
Customer Revenues(1) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Residential | $ | 2,250.0 |
| | $ | 494.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,744.7 |
| $ | 2,309.0 |
| | $ | 481.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,790.6 |
|
| Commercial | 751.9 |
| | 492.7 |
| | — |
| | 1,244.6 |
| 771.3 |
| | 486.6 |
| | — |
| | 1,257.9 |
|
| Industrial | 228.0 |
| | 613.6 |
| | — |
| | 841.6 |
| 245.2 |
| | 607.7 |
| | — |
| | 852.9 |
|
| Off-system | 92.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 92.4 |
| 77.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 77.7 |
|
| Miscellaneous | 49.7 |
| | 17.4 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 67.8 |
| 52.0 |
| | 21.5 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 74.3 |
|
| Total Customer Revenues | $ | 3,372.0 |
| | $ | 1,618.4 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 4,991.1 |
| $ | 3,455.2 |
| | $ | 1,597.4 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 5,053.4 |
|
| Other Revenues | 34.4 |
| | 89.0 |
| | — |
| | 123.4 |
| 54.5 |
| | 101.0 |
| | — |
| | 155.5 |
|
| Total Operating Revenues | $ | 3,406.4 |
| | $ | 1,707.4 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 5,114.5 |
| $ | 3,509.7 |
| | $ | 1,698.4 |
| | $ | 0.8 |
| | $ | 5,208.9 |
|
(1) Customer revenue amounts exclude intersegment revenues. See Note 22,23, "Segments of Business," for discussion of intersegment revenues.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Gas Distribution Operations | | Electric Operations | | Corporate and Other | | Total |
Customer Revenues(1) | | | | | | | |
| Residential | $ | 2,250.0 |
| | $ | 494.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 2,744.7 |
|
| Commercial | 751.9 |
| | 492.7 |
| | — |
| | 1,244.6 |
|
| Industrial | 228.0 |
| | 613.6 |
| | — |
| | 841.6 |
|
| Off-system | 92.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 92.4 |
|
| Miscellaneous | 49.7 |
| | 17.4 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 67.8 |
|
| Total Customer Revenues | $ | 3,372.0 |
| | $ | 1,618.4 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 4,991.1 |
|
| Other Revenues | 34.4 |
| | 89.0 |
| | — |
| | 123.4 |
|
| Total Operating Revenues | $ | 3,406.4 |
| | $ | 1,707.4 |
| | $ | 0.7 |
| | $ | 5,114.5 |
|
(1) Customer revenue amounts exclude intersegment revenues. See Note 23, "Segments of Business," for discussion of intersegment revenues.
Customer Accounts Receivable. Accounts receivable on our Consolidated Balance Sheets includes both billed and unbilled amounts, as well as certain amounts that are not related to customer revenues. Unbilled amounts of accounts receivable relate to a portion of a customer’s consumption of gas or electricity from the date of the last cycle billing through the last day of the month (balance sheet date). Factors taken into consideration when estimating unbilled revenue include historical usage, customer rates and weather. The opening and closing balances of customer receivables for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 are presented in the table below. We had no significant contract assets or liabilities during the period. Additionally, we have not incurred any significant costs to obtain or fulfill contracts.
| | | (in millions) | Customer Accounts Receivable, Billed (less reserve)(1) | | Customer Accounts Receivable, Unbilled (less reserve)(2) | Customer Accounts Receivable, Billed (less reserve)(1) | | Customer Accounts Receivable, Unbilled (less reserve) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | $ | 477.0 |
| | $ | 378.6 |
| |
| Balance as of December 31, 2018 | 540.5 |
| | 349.1 |
| $ | 540.5 |
| | $ | 349.1 |
|
| Increase (Decrease) | $ | 63.5 |
| | $ | (29.5 | ) | |
| Balance as of December 31, 2019 | | 466.6 |
| | 346.6 |
|
| Decrease | | $ | (73.9 | ) | | $ | (2.5 | ) |
(1) Customer billed receivables increased over the perioddecreased due to November 2018 being colder than November 2017, leadingdecreased natural gas costs and warmer weather in 2019 compared to more gas usage included in December bills.
(2) Customer unbilled receivables decreased over the period due December 2018 being warmer than December 2017, leading to less estimated gas usage.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
2018.
Utility revenues are billed to customers monthly on a cycle basis. We generally expect that substantially all customer accounts receivable will be collected within the month following customer billing, as this revenue consists primarily of monthly, tariff-based billings for service and usage.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Other Revenues. As permitted by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, regulated utilities have the ability to earn certain types of revenue that are outside the scope of ASC 606. These revenues primarily represent revenue earned under alternative revenue programs. Alternative revenue programs represent regulator-approved programs that allow for the adjustment of billings and revenue for certain broad, external factors, or for additional billings if the entity achieves certain objectives, such as a specified reduction of costs. We maintain a variety of these programs, including demand side management initiatives that recover costs associated with the implementation of energy efficiency programs, as well as normalization programs that adjust revenues for the effects of weather or other external factors. Additionally, we maintain certain programs with future test periods that operate similarly to FERC formula rate programs and allow for recovery of costs incurred to replace aging infrastructure. When the criteria to recognize Alternative Revenuealternative revenue have been met, we establish a regulatory asset and present revenue from alternative revenue programs on the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) as “Other revenues.” When amounts previously recognized under Alternative Revenuealternative revenue accounting guidance are billed, we reduce the regulatory asset and record a customer account receivable.
4. Earnings Per Share
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income attributable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. The weighted-average shares outstanding for diluted EPS includes the incremental effects of the various long-term incentive compensation plans and forward agreements when the impact of such plans and agreements would be dilutive. The calculation of diluted earnings per share excludes the impact of forward agreements (see Note 12, "Equity"), which had an anti-dilutive effect for the periods outstanding. The computation of diluted average common shares for the year ended December 31, 2018 isdoes not presentedinclude any dilutive potential common shares as we are presentinghad a net loss on the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) for thethat period, and any incremental shares would have had an anti-dilutive impact on EPS. The calculation of diluted earnings per share for the year ended December 31, 2017 excludes the impact of forward agreements, which had an anti-dilutive effect for that period. The computation of diluted average common shares is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Denominator | | | | | |
| Basic average common shares outstanding | 374,650 |
| | 356,491 |
| | 329,388 |
|
| Dilutive potential common shares: | | | | | |
| Shares contingently issuable under employee stock plans | 929 |
| | — |
| | 547 |
|
| Shares restricted under stock plans | 154 |
| | — |
| | 821 |
|
| Forward agreements | 253 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Diluted Average Common Shares | 375,986 |
| | 356,491 |
| | 330,756 |
|
|
| | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in thousands) | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Denominator | | | |
| Basic average common shares outstanding | 329,388 |
| | 321,805 |
|
| Dilutive potential common shares: | | | |
| Shares contingently issuable under employee stock plans | 547 |
| | 165 |
|
| Shares restricted under stock plans | 821 |
| | 1,554 |
|
| Diluted Average Common Shares | 330,756 |
| | 323,524 |
|
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Our property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are classified as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | | | |
Gas Distribution Utility(1) | $ | 14,989.7 |
| | $ | 13,776.0 |
|
Electric Utility(1) | 8,902.3 |
| | 8,374.2 |
|
| Corporate | 153.3 |
| | 155.8 |
|
| Construction Work in Process | 457.3 |
| | 474.8 |
|
| Non-Utility and Other | 39.3 |
| | 38.7 |
|
| Total Property, Plant and Equipment | $ | 24,541.9 |
| | $ | 22,819.5 |
|
| Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | | | |
Gas Distribution Utility(1) | $ | (3,556.0 | ) | | $ | (3,373.8 | ) |
Electric Utility(1) | (3,973.8 | ) | | (3,809.5 | ) |
| Corporate | (79.5 | ) | | (74.6 | ) |
| Non-Utility and Other | (20.4 | ) | | (19.1 | ) |
| Total Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | $ | (7,629.7 | ) | | $ | (7,277.0 | ) |
| Net Property, Plant and Equipment | $ | 16,912.2 |
| | $ | 15,542.5 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | | | |
Gas Distribution Utility(1) | $ | 13,776.0 |
| | $ | 12,531.0 |
|
Electric Utility(1) | 8,374.2 |
| | 7,403.8 |
|
| Corporate | 155.8 |
| | 141.3 |
|
| Construction Work in Process | 474.8 |
| | 950.5 |
|
Non-Utility and Other(2) | 38.7 |
| | 623.3 |
|
| Total Property, Plant and Equipment | $ | 22,819.5 |
| | $ | 21,649.9 |
|
| Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | | | |
Gas Distribution Utility(1) | $ | (3,373.8 | ) | | $ | (3,227.8 | ) |
Electric Utility(1) | (3,809.5 | ) | | (3,673.2 | ) |
| Corporate | (74.6 | ) | | (52.6 | ) |
Non-Utility and Other(2) | (19.1 | ) | | (336.8 | ) |
| Total Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization | $ | (7,277.0 | ) | | $ | (7,290.4 | ) |
| Net Property, Plant and Equipment | $ | 15,542.5 |
| | $ | 14,359.5 |
|
(1)NIPSCO’s common utility plant and associated accumulated depreciation and amortization are allocated between Gas Distribution Utility and Electric Utility Property, Plant and Equipment.
(2)Non-Utility and Other as of December 31, 2017 includes net book value of $247.8 million related to Bailly Generating Station (Units 7 and 8) which was reclassified from Electric Utility in the fourth quarter of 2016. In May 2018, Units 7 and 8 were retired from service and the remaining balance was reclassified to "Regulatory assets (noncurrent)" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 18-E, "Other Matters," and Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
The weighted average depreciation provisions for utility plant, as a percentage of the original cost, for the periods ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 20162017 were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Electric Operations(1) | 2.8 | % | | 2.9 | % | | 3.4 | % |
| Gas Distribution Operations | 2.5 | % | | 2.2 | % | | 2.1 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Electric Operations(1) | 2.9 | % | | 3.4 | % | | 3.3 | % |
| Gas Distribution Operations | 2.2 | % | | 2.1 | % | | 2.1 | % |
(1)Lower depreciation rate beginning in 2018 due to reduced EERM-related depreciation expense and higher depreciable base from transmission assets being placed into service in 2018.
We recognized depreciation expense of $612.2 million, $503.4 million $501.5 million and $475.1$501.5 million for the years ended 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, respectively.
Amortization of Software Costs. We amortized $55.5 million, $54.1 million in 2018,and $44.0 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017, and $41.4 million in 2016respectively, related to software costs. Our unamortized software balance was $159.5$169.6 million and $189.0$159.5 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Amortization of Cloud Computing Costs. We amortized $1.6 million and 2017,$0.1 million in 2019 and 2018, respectively, related to cloud computing costs. Our unamortized cloud computing balance was $14.2 million and $4.9 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Intangible and Other Long-Lived Assets Impairment. Our intangible assets, apart from goodwill, consist of franchise rights. Franchise rights were identified as part of the purchase price allocations associated with the acquisition in February 1999 of Columbia of Massachusetts. We review our definite-lived intangible assets, along with other long-lived assets (utility plant), for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate the assets' fair value might be below their carrying amount.
During the fourth quarter of 2019, in connection with the preparation of the year-end financial statements, we assessed the changes in circumstances that occurred during the quarter to determine if it was more likely than not that the fair value of our long-lived assets (including franchise rights) were below their carrying amount. While there was no single determinative event or factor, the consideration in totality of several factors that developed during the fourth quarter of 2019 led us to conclude that it was more likely than not that the fair value of the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit and the value of its long-lived assets was below
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
its carrying value. These factors included: (i) increased Massachusetts DPU regulatory enforcement activity related to Columbia of Massachusetts during the fourth quarter, including (a) an order imposing work restrictions on Columbia of Massachusetts, impacting Columbia of Massachusetts' infrastructure replacement program, (b) two orders opening public investigations into Columbia of Massachusetts related to the Greater Lawrence Incident and restoration efforts following the incident, and (c) an order defining the scope of the Massachusetts DPU's investigation into the preparation and response of Columbia of Massachusetts related to the incident; (ii) increased uncertainty as to the ability of Columbia of Massachusetts to execute its growth strategy, including utility infrastructure investments, and to obtain timely regulatory outcomes with reasonable rates of return; (iii) further damage to Columbia of Massachusetts' reputation as a result of concerns related to service lines abandoned during the restoration work following the Greater Lawrence Incident and the gas release event in Lawrence, Massachusetts on September 27, 2019; and (iv) the potential sale of the Massachusetts Business. See Note 19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies - C. Legal Proceedings" for more information regarding Massachusetts DPU regulatory enforcement activity. See Note 26, "Subsequent Event" for more information on the potential sale of the Massachusetts Business.
As a result, we performed a year-end impairment test of the held and used long-lived assets in which we compared the book value of the Columbia of Massachusetts asset group to its undiscounted future cash flow and determined the carrying value of the asset group was not recoverable. We estimated the fair value of the Columbia of Massachusetts asset group using a weighting of income and market approaches and determined that the fair value was less than the carrying value. This resulting impairment was allocated to reduce the entire franchise rights book value to its fair value of zero, which resulted in an impairment charge totaling $209.7 million recorded in the Gas Distribution Operations segment.
We also considered if any regulatory assets or ROU assets were probable of disallowance and determined no disallowances were probable. All of Columbia of Massachusetts' regulatory assets represent incurred costs probable of recovery.
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the carrying amount of the franchise rights was $0.0 million and $220.7 million (net of accumulated amortization of $221.5 million), respectively. We recorded amortization expense of $11.0 million in 2019, 2018 and 2017 related to our franchise rights intangible asset.
Goodwill. Substantially all of our goodwill relates to the excess of cost over the fair value of the net assets acquired in the Columbia acquisition on November 1, 2000. The following presents our goodwill balance allocated by segment as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | 1,485.9 |
| | $ | 1,690.7 |
|
| Electric Operations | — |
| | — |
|
| Corporate and Other | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | $ | 1,485.9 |
| | $ | 1,690.7 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | | Gas Distribution Operations | | Electric Operations | | Corporate and Other | | Total |
| Goodwill | | $ | 1,690.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 1,690.7 |
|
We applied the qualitative "step 0"For our annual goodwill impairment analysis to our reporting units for the annual impairment test performed as of May 1, 2018. For this test,2019, we completed a qualitative "step 0" analysis for all reporting units other than our Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit. In the step 0 analysis, we assessed various assumptions, events and circumstances that would have affected the estimated fair value of the applicable reporting units as compared to their base linebaseline May 1, 2016 "step 1" fair value measurement. The results of this assessment indicated
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
that it was not more likely than not that ourthe fair values of these reporting unit fair valuesunits were less than the reporting unittheir respective carrying values, accordingly, no "step 1" analysis was required.
In the third quarterThe results of 2018, we determinedour Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit were negatively impacted by the Greater Lawrence Incident (see Note 18, "Other Commitments and Contingencies"19-C, "Legal Proceedings") represented. As a triggering event that required an impairmentresult, we completed a quantitative "step 1" analysis of goodwill.for the May 1, 2019 goodwill analysis for this reporting unit. This incident specifically impacts ouranalysis considered the progress Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit in which the associated goodwill totaled $204.8 million immediately priorhad made with its restoration efforts related to the incident. We performed a quantitativeGreater Lawrence Incident, including the replacement of previously repaired equipment and the settlement agreement with the three impacted municipalities, as well as the ability for Columbia of Massachusetts to sustain its infrastructure replacement growth strategy through GSEP and timely rate cases with reasonable rates of return. Consistent with our historical impairment analysis astesting of September 30, 2018 and determined that thegoodwill, fair value of the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit continues to exceed its carrying value. Therefore, no goodwill impairment charges were recorded inwas determined based on a weighting of income and market approaches. These approaches require significant judgments, including appropriate long-term growth rates and discount rates for the third quarterincome approach and appropriate multiples of 2018. This interim analysis was performed using then-currentearnings for peer companies and control premiums for the market approach. These approaches also incorporate the latest available cash flow projections reflecting the estimated ongoing impacts of the Greater Lawrence Incident on Columbia of Massachusetts'Massachusetts’ operations. We also updated other significant inputsThe discount rates were derived using peer company
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
data compiled with the assistance of a third party valuation services firm. The discount rates used are subject to change based on changes in tax rates at both the state and federal level, debt and equity ratios at each reporting unit and general economic conditions. The long-term growth rate was derived by evaluating historic growth rates, new business and investment opportunities beyond the near term horizon. The long-term growth rate is subject to change depending on inflationary impacts to the fair value calculation (e.g. discount rate, market multiples) to reflect then-current market conditionsU.S. economy and increased risk and uncertainty resulting from the incident. No additional facts came to light since the third quarter impairmentindividual business environments in which each reporting unit operates. The step 1 analysis was completed that would indicate it was more likely than notperformed indicated that the fair value of the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit would have decreased belowexceeds its carrying value; thereforevalue. As a result, no goodwill impairment charges werecharge was recorded as of the May 1, 2019 test date.
Although our annual impairment test is performed during the second quarter, we continue to monitor changes in circumstances that may indicate that it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting units is less than the reporting unit carrying value. During the fourth quarter of 2018. We will continue to monitor2019, in connection with the impactspreparation of the incident for events that could triggeryear-end financial statements, we assessed the matters related to Columbia of Massachusetts. These factors were the same fourth quarter circumstances outlined in the intangible and other long-lived assets impairment above.
As a result, a new impairment analysis including, but not limitedwas required for our Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit. Consistent with the May 1, 2019 test, fair value of this reporting unit was determined based on a weighting of income and market approaches. The income approach calculated discounted cash flows using updated cash flow projections, discount rates and return on equity assumptions. The market approach applied a combination of comparable company multiples and comparable transactions and used updated cash flow projections. While certain assumptions, such as market multiples, remained unchanged in the year-end test, our cash flow projections, return on equity and rate case assumptions were all unfavorably updated at year-end compared to the May 1, 2019 test. The effects of these unfavorable regulatory outcomes and NTSB investigation results.
Intangible Assets. Our intangible assets, apart from goodwill, consistdevelopments were greater than the favorable change in weighted average cost of franchise rights. Franchise rights were identified as partcapital between the two tests. The year-end impairment analysis indicated that the fair value of the purchase price allocations associated with the acquisition in February 1999 of Columbia of Massachusetts. These amounts were $220.7Massachusetts reporting unit was below its carrying value. As a result, we reduced the Columbia of Massachusetts reporting unit goodwill balance to zero and recognized a goodwill impairment charge totaling$204.8 million, and $231.7 million, net of accumulated amortization of $221.5 million and $210.5 million, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over forty years from the date of acquisition through 2039. NiSource recorded amortization expense of $11.0 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016 related to its franchise right intangible asset.which is non-deductible for tax purposes.
7. Asset Retirement Obligations
We have recognized asset retirement obligations associated with various legal obligations including costs to remove and dispose of certain construction materials located within many of our facilities, certain costs to retire pipeline, removal costs for certain underground storage tanks, removal of certain pipelines known to contain PCB contamination, closure costs for certain sites including ash ponds, solid waste management units and a landfill, as well as some other nominal asset retirement obligations. We also have a significant obligation associated with the decommissioning of our two hydro facilities located in Indiana. These hydro facilities have an indeterminate life, and as such, no asset retirement obligation has been recorded.
Changes in our liability for asset retirement obligations for the years 20182019 and 20172018 are presented in the table below:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | |
| Beginning Balance | $ | 352.0 |
| | $ | 268.7 |
| |
| Accretion recorded as a regulatory asset/liability | 15.7 |
| | 11.1 |
| |
| Additions | — |
| | 63.3 |
| (2) |
| Settlements | (5.4 | ) | | (5.9 | ) | |
Change in estimated cash flows | 54.6 |
| (1) | 14.8 |
| (2) |
| Ending Balance | $ | 416.9 |
| | $ | 352.0 |
| |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | |
| Beginning Balance | $ | 268.7 |
| | $ | 262.6 |
| |
| Accretion recorded as a regulatory asset/liability | 11.1 |
| | 10.3 |
| |
| Additions | 63.3 |
| (1) | 2.4 |
| |
| Settlements | (5.9 | ) | | (15.6 | ) | |
Change in estimated cash flows | 14.8 |
| (1) | 9.0 |
| (2) |
| Ending Balance | $ | 352.0 |
| | $ | 268.7 |
| |
(1)The change in estimated cash flows for 2019 is primarily attributed to changes in estimated costs and settlement timing for electric generating stations and the changes in estimated costs for retirement of gas mains.
(2)In 2018, $59.8 million of additions and $17.7 million of the change in estimated cash flows are attributed to costs associated with refining the CCR compliance plan. See Note 18-D,19-D, "Environmental Matters," for additional information on CCRs.
(2)The change in estimated cash flows for 2017 is primarily attributed to changes in estimated costs and settlement timing for electric generating stations and the changes in estimated costs for retirement of gas mains.
Certain non-legal costs of removal that have been, and continue to be, included in depreciation rates and collected in the customer rates of the rate-regulated subsidiaries are classified as "Regulatory liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
We follow the accounting and reporting requirements of ASC Topic 980, which provides that regulated entities account for and report assets and liabilities consistent with the economic effect of regulatory rate-making procedures if the rates established are
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
designed to recover the costs of providing the regulated service and it is probable that such rates can be charged and collected from customers. Certain expenses and credits subject to utility regulation or rate determination normally reflected in income or expense are deferred on the balance sheet and are recognized in the income statement as the related amounts are included in customer rates and recovered from or refunded to customers.
Regulatory assets were comprised of the following items:
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Regulatory Assets | | | |
| Unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs (see Note 11) | $ | 739.1 |
| | $ | 798.3 |
|
| Deferred pension and other postretirement benefit costs (see Note 11) | 91.3 |
| | 74.1 |
|
| Environmental costs (see Note 19-D) | 73.4 |
| | 61.5 |
|
| Regulatory effects of accounting for income taxes (see Note 1-N and Note 10) | 234.0 |
| | 233.1 |
|
| Under-recovered gas and fuel costs (see Note 1-J) | 3.9 |
| | 34.7 |
|
| Depreciation | 210.7 |
| | 209.6 |
|
| Post-in-service carrying charges | 219.8 |
| | 206.6 |
|
| Safety activity costs | 118.6 |
| | 91.7 |
|
| DSM programs | 50.1 |
| | 45.5 |
|
| Bailly Generating Station | 221.8 |
| | 244.3 |
|
| Other | 276.9 |
| | 238.1 |
|
| Total Regulatory Assets | $ | 2,239.6 |
| | $ | 2,237.5 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Regulatory Assets | | | |
| Unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs (see Note 11) | $ | 798.3 |
| | $ | 733.5 |
|
| Deferred pension and other postretirement benefit costs (see Note 11) | 74.1 |
| | 70.7 |
|
| Environmental costs (see Note 18-D) | 61.5 |
| | 63.4 |
|
| Regulatory effects of accounting for income taxes (see Note 1-N and Note 10) | 233.1 |
| | 238.8 |
|
| Under-recovered gas and fuel costs (see Note 1-K) | 34.7 |
| | 25.5 |
|
| Depreciation | 209.6 |
| | 181.0 |
|
| Post-in-service carrying charges | 206.6 |
| | 173.3 |
|
| Safety activity costs | 91.7 |
| | 66.5 |
|
| DSM programs | 45.5 |
| | 40.0 |
|
| Bailly Generating Station | 244.3 |
| | — |
|
| Other | 238.1 |
| | 208.5 |
|
| Total Regulatory Assets | $ | 2,237.5 |
| | $ | 1,801.2 |
|
Regulatory liabilities were comprised of the following items:
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Regulatory Liabilities | | | |
| Over-recovered gas and fuel costs (see Note 1-J) | $ | 42.6 |
| | $ | 32.0 |
|
| Cost of removal (see Note 7) | 1,047.5 |
| | 1,076.0 |
|
| Regulatory effects of accounting for income taxes (see Note 1-N and Note 10) | 1,307.0 |
| | 1,428.3 |
|
| Deferred pension and other postretirement benefit costs (see Note 11) | 64.7 |
| | 62.7 |
|
| Other | 50.4 |
| | 61.0 |
|
| Total Regulatory Liabilities | $ | 2,512.2 |
| | $ | 2,660.0 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Regulatory Liabilities | | | |
| Over-recovered gas and fuel costs (see Note 1-K) | $ | 32.0 |
| | $ | 27.6 |
|
| Cost of removal (see Note 7) | 1,076.0 |
| | 1,096.8 |
|
| Regulatory effects of accounting for income taxes (see Note 1-O and Note 10) | 1,428.3 |
| | 1,563.4 |
|
| Deferred pension and other postretirement benefit costs (see Note 11) | 62.7 |
| | 59.0 |
|
| Other | 61.0 |
| | 48.8 |
|
| Total Regulatory Liabilities | $ | 2,660.0 |
| | $ | 2,795.6 |
|
Regulatory assets, including under-recovered gas and fuel cost, of approximately $1,552.6$1,524.3 million as of December 31, 20182019 are not earning a return on investment. These costs are recovered over a remaining life of up to 41 years. Regulatory assets of approximately $1,917.1$1,932.4 million include expenses that are recovered as components of the cost of service and are covered by regulatory orders. Regulatory assets of approximately $320.4$307.2 million at December 31, 2018,2019, require specific rate action.
Assets:
Unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs. In 2007, we adopted certain updates of ASC 715 which required, among other things, the recognition in other comprehensive income or loss of the actuarial gains or losses and the prior service costs or credits that arise during the period but that are not immediately recognized as components of net periodic benefit costs. Certain subsidiaries defer these gains or losses as a regulatory asset in accordance with regulatory orders or as a result of regulatory precedent, to be recovered through base rates.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Deferred pension and other postretirement benefit costs. Primarily relates to the difference between postretirement expense recorded by certain subsidiaries due to regulatory orders and the postretirement expense recorded in accordance with GAAP. These costs are expected to be collected through future base rates, revenue riders or tracking mechanisms.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Environmental costs.Includes certain recoverable costs of investigating, testing, remediating and other costs related to gas plant sites, disposal sites or other sites onto which material may have migrated. Certain of our companies defer the costs as a regulatory asset in accordance with regulatory orders, to be recovered in future base rates, billing riders or tracking mechanisms.
Regulatory effects of accounting for income taxes. Represents the deferral and under collection of deferred taxes in the rate making process. In prior years, we have lowered customer rates in certain jurisdictions for the benefits of accelerated tax deductions. Amounts are expensed for financial reporting purposes as we recover deferred taxes in the rate making process.
Under-recovered gas and fuel costs. Represents the difference between the costs of gas and fuel and the recovery of such costs in revenue and is used to adjust future billings for such deferrals on a basis consistent with applicable state-approved tariff provisions. Recovery of these costs is achieved through tracking mechanisms.
Depreciation. Represents differences between depreciation expense incurred on a GAAP basis and that prescribed through regulatory order. Significant components of this balance include:
| |
| • | Columbia of Ohio depreciation rates. Prior to 2005, the PUCO-approved depreciation rates for rate-making had been lower than those which would have been utilized if Columbia of Ohio were not subject to regulation resulting in the creation of a regulatory asset. In 2005, the PUCO authorized Columbia of Ohio to revise its depreciation accrual rates for the period beginning January 1, 2005. The revised depreciation rates are higher than those which would have been utilized if Columbia of Ohio were not subject to regulation allowing for amortization of the previously created regulatory asset. The amount of depreciation that would have been recorded from 2005 through 2019 had Columbia of Ohio not been subject to rate regulation is a cumulative $923.5 million, $103.8 million less than that reflected in rates. The resulting regulatory asset balance was $27.9 million and $39.5 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. |
| |
| • | Columbia of Ohio IRP and CEP. Columbia of Ohio also has PUCO approval to defer depreciation and debt-based post-in-service carrying charges (see "Post-in-service carrying charges" below) associated with its IRP and CEP. As of December 31, 2019, depreciation of $31.9 million and $77.2 million was deferred for the respective programs. Depreciation deferral balances for the respective programs as of December 31, 2018 were $29.1 million and $76.0 million. Recovery of the depreciation is approved annually through the IRP and CEP riders. The equivalent of annual depreciation expense, based on the average life of the related assets, is included in the calculation of the IRP and CEP riders approved by the PUCO and billed to customers. Deferred depreciation expense is recognized as the IRP and CEP riders are billed to customers. |
| |
| • | NIPSCO ECRM. NIPSCO obtained approval from the IURC to recover certain environmental related costs including operation and maintenance and depreciation expense once the environmental facilities become operational. The ECRM deferred charges represent expenses that will be recovered from customers through an annual ECRM Cost Tracker (ECT) which authorizes the collection of deferred balances over a six month period. Depreciation of $15.2 million and $14.4 million was deferred to a regulatory asset as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. This regulatory asset was included in electric base rates, which was approved by the IURC on December 4, 2019. |
| |
| • | NIPSCO TDSIC. NIPSCO obtained approval from the IURC to recover costs for certain system modernization projects outside of a base rate proceeding. Eighty percent of the related costs, including depreciation, property taxes, and debt and equity based carrying charges (see "Post-in-service carrying charges" below) are recovered through a semi-annual recovery mechanism. Recovery of these costs will continue through the TDSIC tracker until such assets are included in rate base through a gas or electric base rate case, respectively. The remaining twenty percent of the costs are deferred until the next base rate case. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, depreciation of $22.0 million and $16.5 million, respectively, was deferred as a regulatory asset. |
Columbia of Ohio depreciation rates. Prior to 2005, the PUCO-approved depreciation rates for rate-making had been lower than those which would have been utilized if Columbia of Ohio were not subject to regulation resulting in the creation of a regulatory asset. In 2005, the PUCO authorized Columbia of Ohio to revise its depreciation accrual rates for the period beginning January 1, 2005. The revised depreciation rates are now higher than those which would have been utilized if Columbia of Ohio were not subject to regulation allowing for amortization of the previously created regulatory asset. The amount of depreciation that would have been recorded from 2005 through 2018 had Columbia of Ohio not been subject to rate regulation is a cumulative $806.8 million, $92.2 million less than that reflected in rates. The resulting regulatory asset balance was $39.5 million and $49.3 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Columbia of Ohio IRP and CEP. Columbia of Ohio also has PUCO approval to defer depreciation and debt-based post-in-service carrying charges (see "Post-in-service carrying charges" below) associated with its IRP and CEP. As of December 31, 2018, depreciation of $29.1 million and $76.0 million was deferred for the respective programs. Depreciation deferral balances for the respective programs as of December 31, 2017 were $26.5 million and $49.8 million. Recovery of the IRP depreciation is approved annually through the IRP rider. The equivalent of annual depreciation expense, based on the average life of the related assets, is included in the calculation of the IRP rider approved by the PUCO and billed to customers. Deferred depreciation expense is recognized as the IRP rider is billed to customers. The recovery mechanism for depreciation associated with the CEP is discussed in "Additional Regulatory Matters," below.
NIPSCO ECRM. NIPSCO obtained approval from the IURC to recover certain environmental related costs including operation and maintenance and depreciation expense once the environmental facilities become operational. The ECRM deferred charges represent expenses that will be recovered from customers through an annual ECRM Cost Tracker (ECT) which authorizes the collection of deferred balances over a six month period. Recovery of these costs will continue until such assets are included in rate base through an electric base rate case. Depreciation of $14.4 million and $13.9 million was deferred to a regulatory asset as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
NIPSCO TDSIC. NIPSCO obtained approval from the IURC to recover costs for certain system modernization projects outside of a base rate proceeding. Eighty percent of the related costs, including depreciation, property taxes, and debt and equity based carrying charges (see "Post-in-service carrying charges" below) are recovered through a semi-annual recovery mechanism. Recovery of these costs will continue through the TDSIC tracker until such assets are included in rate base through a gas or electric base rate case, respectively. The remaining twenty percent of the costs are deferred until the next base rate case. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, depreciation of $16.5 million and $10.3 million, respectively, was deferred as a regulatory asset.
Post-in-service carrying charges. Represents deferred debt-based carrying charges incurred on certain assets placed into service but not yet included in customer rates. This balance includes:
| |
| • | Columbia of Ohio IRP and CEP. See description of IRP and CEP programs above under the heading "Depreciation." As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Columbia of Ohio had deferred PISCC of $206.4 million and $197.1 million, respectively. |
| |
| • | NIPSCO TDSIC. See description of TDSIC program above under the heading "Depreciation." Deferral of equity-based carrying charges for the TDSIC program is allowed; however, such amounts are not reflected in regulatory asset balances for financial reporting as equity-based returns do not meet the definition of incurred costs under ASC 980. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, NIPSCO had deferred PISCC of $13.4 million and $9.5 million, respectively. |
Columbia of Ohio IRP and CEP. See description of IRP and CEP programs above under the heading "Depreciation." As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, Columbia of Ohio had deferred PISCC of $197.1 million and $164.6 million, respectively.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NIPSCO TDSIC. See description of TDSIC program above under the heading "Depreciation." Deferral of equity-based carrying charges for the TDSIC program is allowed; however, such amounts are not reflected in regulatory asset balances for financial reporting as equity-based returns do not meet the definition of incurred costs under ASC 980. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, NIPSCO had deferred PISCC of $9.5 million and $8.7 million, respectively.
Safety activity costs. Represents the difference between costs incurred in eligible safety programs in excess of those being recovered in rates. The eligible cost deferrals represent necessary business expenses incurred in compliance with PHMSA regulations and are targeted to enhance the safety of the pipeline systems. Certain subsidiaries defer the excess costs as a regulatory asset in accordance with regulatory orders and recovery of these costs will be addressaddressed in future base rate proceedings.
DSM programs. Represents costs associated with Gas Distribution Operations and Electric Operations segments' energy efficiency and conservation programs. Costs are recovered through tracking mechanisms.
Bailly Generating Station. Represents the net book value of Units 7 and 8 of Bailly Generating Station that was retired during 2018. These amounts are currently being amortized at a rate consistent with their inclusion in customer rates.
Liabilities:
Over-recovered gas and fuel costs. Represents the difference between the cost of gas and fuel and the recovery of such costs in revenues and is the basis to adjust future billings for such refunds on a basis consistent with applicable state-approved tariff provisions. Refunding of these revenues is achieved through tracking mechanisms.
Cost of removal. Represents anticipated costs of removal that have been, and continue to be, included in depreciation rates and collected in customer rates of the rate-regulated subsidiaries for future costs to be incurred.
Regulatory effects of accounting for income taxes. Represents amounts owed to customers for deferred taxes collected at a higher rate than the current statutory rates and liabilities associated with accelerated tax deductions owed to customers that are established during the rate making process. Balance includes excess deferred taxes recorded upon implementation of the TCJA in December 2017, net of amounts amortized during 2018.through 2019.
Deferred pension and other postretirement benefit costs. Primarily represents cash contributions in excess of postretirement benefit expense that is deferred as a regulatory liability by certain subsidiaries in accordance with regulatory orders.
Cost Recovery and Trackers
Comparability of our line item operating results is impacted by regulatory trackers that allow for the recovery in rates of certain costs such as those described below. Increases in the expenses that are the subject of trackers generally result in a corresponding increase in operating revenues and, therefore, have essentially no impact on total operating income results.
Certain costs of our operating companies are significant, recurring in nature and generally outside the control of the operating companies. Some states allow the recovery of such costs through cost tracking mechanisms. Such tracking mechanisms allow for abbreviated regulatory proceedings in order for the operating companies to implement charges and recover appropriate costs. Tracking mechanisms allow for more timely recovery of such costs as compared with more traditional cost recovery mechanisms. Examples of such mechanisms include GCR adjustment mechanisms, tax riders, bad debt recovery mechanisms, electric energy efficiency programs, MISO non-fuel costs and revenues, resource capacity charges, federally mandated costs and environmental-related costs.
A portion of the Gas Distribution revenue is related to the recovery of gas costs, the review and recovery of which occurs through standard regulatory proceedings. All states in our operating area require periodic review of actual gas procurement activity to determine prudence and to permit the recovery of prudently incurred costs related to the supply of gas for customers. Our distribution companies have historically been found prudent in the procurement of gas supplies to serve customers.
A portion of the Electric Operations revenue is related to the recovery of fuel costs to generate power and the fuel costs related to purchased power. These costs are recovered through a FAC, a quarterly regulatory proceeding in Indiana.
Infrastructure Replacement and Federally-Mandated Compliance Programs
CertainAll of our operating utility companies have completed rate proceedings involving infrastructure replacement or enhancement, or are embarkingand have embarked upon regulatory initiatives to replace significant portions of their operating systems that are nearing the end of their
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
useful lives. Each operating company's approach to cost recovery may beis unique, given the different laws, regulations and precedent that exist in each jurisdiction.
Columbia of Ohio, IRP - On December 3, 2008, the PUCO issued an order which established Columbia of Ohio’s IRP. Pursuant to that order, the IRP provides for recovery of costs resulting from: (1) the maintenance, repair and replacement of customer-owned service lines that have been determined by Columbia of Ohio to present an existing or probable hazard to persons and property;
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
(2) Columbia of Ohio’s replacement of cast iron, wrought iron, unprotected coated steel and bare steel pipe and associated company and customer-owned metallic service lines; (3) the replacement of customer-owned natural gas risers identified by the PUCO as prone to failure; and (4) the installation of AMR devices on all residential and commercial meters served by Columbia of Ohio. Recoverable costs include a return on investment, depreciation and property taxes, offset by specified cost savings. Columbia of Ohio’s five-year IRP plan renewal was last approved on January 31, 2018 for the years 2018-2022.
Columbia of Ohio, CEP - On October 3, 2011, Columbia of Ohio filed an application for approval to establish the CEP that would provide for the deferral of PISCC on those assets placed into service, but not reflected in rates as plant in service, and the deferral of depreciation expense and property taxes directly attributable to the CEP assets for the period October 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012. Capital expenditures covered under this program included those placed into service that were not part of Columbia of Ohio's IRP. CEP was approved by the PUCO on August 29, 2012. Under this program, the PUCO’s approval provided for the deferral of related PISCC, depreciation and property taxes up to the point where the deferred amount, if included in rates, would exceed $1.50 per month impact on the Small General Service class of customers, subject to the PUCO’s determination of the prudence and reasonableness of investments covered under this program in a future regulatory proceeding. Subsequently, on October 3, 2013, the PUCO modified and approved Columbia of Ohio’s application to continue its CEP deferrals in 2013 and succeeding years, subject to the determination of the prudence, reasonableness and magnitude of the deferrals and capital expenditures in a future cost recovery proceeding. On December 1, 2017, Columbia of Ohio filed an application in which it requested authority to implement a rider to begin recovering plant and associated deferrals related to its CEP. On October 25, 2018, a joint stipulation and recommendation was filed to recover CEP investments and deferrals through December 31, 2017, with annual adjustments for capital investments made in subsequent years. Additionally, the signatory parties to the stipulation agreed to a reduction in rates to adjust for the impacts of the Tax Cut Jobs Act and for a base rate case filing to be made by Columbia of Ohio no later than June 30, 2021. On November 28, 2018 the PUCO issued an order unanimously approving the settlement, without modification.
NIPSCO Gas and Electric, TDSIC - On April 30, 2013, the Indiana Governor signed Senate Enrolled Act 560, known as the TDSIC statute, into law. Among other provisions, the TDSIC statute provides for cost recovery outside of a base rate proceeding for new or replacement electric and gas transmission, distribution, and storage projects that a public utility undertakes for the purposes of safety, reliability, system modernization or economic development. Provisions of the TDSIC statute require that, among other things, requests for recovery include a seven-year plan of eligible investments. Once the plan is approved by the IURC, eighty percent of eligible costs can be recovered using a periodic rate adjustment mechanism, known as the TDSIC mechanism. Recoverable costs include a return on the investment, including AFUDC, PISCC, operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation and property taxes. The remaining twenty percent of recoverable costs are deferred for future recovery in NIPSCO's next general rate case. The semi-annualThis rate adjustment mechanism is cappedtypically filed semi-annually and has a cap at an annual increase of two percent of total retail revenues. During the 2019 Legislative session, the Indiana General Assembly amended the TDSIC statute in House Enrolled Act 1470 that was signed into law by the Governor on April 24, 2019. The revisions that became effective on July 1, 2019 permit flexibility in TDSIC Plans between five and seven years in length, permits the IURC to authorize multi-unit projects that do not include specific locations or an exact number of inspections, repairs, or replacements and projects involving advanced technology investments to support the modernization of transmission, distribution, or storage systems. The amendments also authorize termination of TDSIC Plans prior to their expiration and provide that the projects associated with the terminated plan will continue to receive TDSIC treatment until an Order is issued in the utility’s next general rate case, and provide for the ability to seek approval of a new TDSIC Plan. The amended statute also provides that the two percent revenue cap applies to the aggregate of approved TDSIC Plans and requires that the utility file a base rate case at some point during the term of each TDSIC plan. On December 31, 2019, NIPSCO Gas filed a new 6-year TDSIC for the periods 2020 through 2025.
NIPSCO Electric, ECRM - NIPSCO has approval from the IURC to recover certain environmental related costs through an ECT (environmental cost tracker). Under the ECT, NIPSCO is permitted to recover (1) AFUDC and a return on the capital investment expended by NIPSCO to implement environmental compliance plan projects and (2) related operation and maintenance and depreciation expenses once the environmental facilities become operational. All deferred costs associated with ECRM were included in electric rate base and approved by the IURC on December 4, 2019.
NIPSCO Gas and Electric, FMCA - The FMCA statute provides for cost recovery outside of a base rate proceeding for projected federally mandated costs. Once the plan is approved by the IURC, eighty percent of eligible costs can be recovered using a periodic rate adjustment mechanism, known as the FMCA mechanism. Recoverable costs include a return on the investment, including AFUDC, PISCC, mandated operation and maintenance expenses, depreciation and property taxes. The remaining twenty percent of recoverable costs are deferred for future recovery in NIPSCO's next general rate case. Actual costs that exceed the projected
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
federally mandated costs of the approved compliance project by more than twenty-five percent shall require specific justification by NIPSCO and specific approval by the IURC before being authorized in the next general rate case.
Columbia of Massachusetts, GSEP - On July 7, 2014, the Governor of Massachusetts signed into law Chapter 149 of the Acts of 2014, an Act Relative to Natural Gas Leaks (“the Act”). TheAdopted into the Massachusetts Utility Provisions, G.L. c. 164, § 145, the Act authorizes natural gas distribution companies to file a GSEP for capital investments made on or after January 1, 2015, that are not included in the Company’scompany’s current rate base as determined in the most recent base rate case, with the Massachusetts DPU to (1) address the replacement or improvement of existing aging natural gas pipeline infrastructure to improve public safety or infrastructure reliability, and (2) reduce the lost and unaccounted for natural gas through a reduction in natural gas system leaks. In addition, the Act provides that the Massachusetts DPU may, after review of the plan, allow the proposed estimated costs of the plan into rates as of May 1 of the subsequent year. Recoverable costs include a return on investment, depreciation and property taxes, offset by identified operations and maintenance cost savings. RatesBeginning with the 2019 GSEP, rates are subject to a capped annual revenue increase of three percent of total annual firm delivery revenues, plus imputed gas revenues for sales and transportation customers, calculated as the product of (1) the historical average cost of gas per therm, and (2) the average weather normalized sales, for the period beginning with 2013 and ending with the most recent year that actual data is available at the time of the October GSEP Plan filing, per the Massachusetts DPU order in Columbia of Massachusetts' 2019 GSEP. Prior to the 2019 GSEP, the annual revenue increase was capped at one and a half percent of total annual delivery and cost of gas revenues from sales and transportation, including imputed gas revenues for transportation, for the calendar year preceding the projected GSEP calendar year being filed.percent. At the end of each 12-month period, in May of the subsequent year, Columbia of Massachusetts must file a reconciliation of the amount collected and actual costs. Any over-collection or under-collection balance is passed back to, or recovered from, customers through the surcharge over a 12-month period beginning in November. On October 31, 2019, the Massachusetts DPU issued an order on Columbia of Massachusetts' GSEP reconciliation proceeding finding that, due to pending investigations of the Greater Lawrence Incident and other operational matters, the Massachusetts DPU could not, at this time, make a finding of prudence with respect to the Columbia of Massachusetts' 2018 GSEP investments and deferred the decision on the prudency of the 2018 GSEP investments in the annual GSEP and GSEP reconciliation filings until the investigations by the DPU are complete. The DPU added that its inability to make a finding of prudence did not constitute a finding of imprudence. Once new base rates are established under a base rate proceeding, the GSEP factor is re-set to remove the capital investment and associated revenue reflected in the base rates. Columbia of Massachusetts' current five year GSEP plan for the periods 2019-2023 was approved April 30, 2019.
Columbia of Pennsylvania, DSIC - On February 14, 2012, the Governor of Pennsylvania signed into law Act 11 of 2012, which provided a DSIC mechanism for certain utilities to recover costs related to repair, replacement or improvement of eligible distribution property that has not previously been reflected in rates or rate base. Through a DSIC, a utility may recover the fixed costs of eligible infrastructure incurred during the three months ended one month prior to the effective date of the charge, thereby reducing the historical regulatory lag associated with cost recovery through the traditional rate-making process. On March 14, 2013, the Pennsylvania PUC approved Columbia of Pennsylvania’s petition to implement a DSIC as of April 1, 2013. Accordingly, Columbia of Pennsylvania is authorized to recover the cost of eligible plant associated with repair, replacement or improvement that was not
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
previously reflected in rate base and has been placed in service during the applicable three-month period. After the initial charge is established, the DSIC is updated quarterly to recover the cost of further plant additions and cannot exceed five percent of distribution revenues. Recoverable costs include a return on investment, exclusive of accumulated deferred income taxes from the calculation of rate base, and depreciation. Once new base rates are established under a base rate proceeding, the DSIC is set to zero. Additionally, the DSIC rate is also reset to zero if, in any quarter, the data reflected in the Columbia of Pennsylvania's most recent quarterly financial earnings report show that the utility will earn an overall rate of return that would exceed the allowable rate of return used to calculate its fixed costs under the DSIC mechanism. A utility is exempt from filing a quarterly financial earnings report when a base rate proceeding is pending before the Pennsylvania PUC.
Columbia of Virginia, SAVE - On March 11, 2010, the Virginia Governor signed legislation into law that allows natural gas utilities to implement programs to replace qualifying infrastructure on an expedited basis and provides for timely cost recovery. Known as the SAVE Act, the law allows natural gas utilities to file programs with the VSCC providing a timeline and estimated costs for replacing eligible infrastructure. Eligible infrastructure replacement projects are those that (1) enhance safety or reliability by reducing system integrity risks associated with customer outages, corrosion, equipment failures, material failures, or natural forces; (2) do not increase revenues by directly connecting the infrastructure replacement to new customers; (3) reduce or have the potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; (4) are not included in the natural gas utility’s rate base in its most recent rate case; and (5) are commenced on or after January 1, 2010. The SAVE Act provides for recovery of costs associated with the eligible infrastructure through a rate rider. Recoverable costs include a return on investment, depreciation and property taxes. Columbia of Virginia’s current five year SAVE plan was approved by the VSCC in 2016 and amended in 2017 for the years 2016 through 2020 and amended in 2019 for calendar year 2020.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Columbia of Kentucky, AMRPSMRP (formerly AMRP) - On October 26, 2009, the Kentucky PSC approved a mechanism for recovering the costs of Columbia of Kentucky’s AMRP not previously reflected in rate base through an annual fixed monthly rate rider filed in October.In its 2013 rate case, Columbia of Kentucky was allowed to base the AMRP rider on the expected annual cost of service. Recoverable costs include a return on investment, depreciation and property taxes, offset by specific cost savings. At the end of each 12-month period, Columbia of Kentucky must file a reconciliation of the amount collected and actual costs. Any over-collection or under-collection balance is passed back to, or recovered from, customers through the surcharge over a 12-month period beginning in June of the subsequent year. Once new base rates are established under a base rate proceeding, the AMRP rider is set to zero. On July 29, 2019, CKY filed its SMRP to clarify approval of low pressure project spend and expand its AMRP to include for recovery of system safety investments, including low pressure project spend. On November 7, 2019, the Commission approved Columbia of Kentucky's request to amend and expand its annual AMRP to become the SMRP.
Columbia of Maryland, STRIDE - On May 2, 2013, the Governor of Maryland signed Senate Bill 8 into law, authorizing gas companies to accelerate recovery of eligible infrastructure replacement, effective June 1, 2013. The STRIDE statute provides recovery for gas pipeline upgrades outside of the context of a base rate proceeding through an annual surcharge, IRIS, as approved by the Maryland PSC. The STRIDE statute directs gas utilities to file a plan to invest in eligible infrastructure replacement projects and to list the specific projects and elements in any such STRIDE plan with the Maryland PSC. The calendar year projected capital projects to be placed into plant in service and included in Columbia of Maryland's surcharge recovery request must satisfy a number of criteria per the statute, including a requirement that they be designed to improve public safety or infrastructure reliability. Columbia of Maryland’s five-year STRIDE Plan renewal for years 2019 through 2023, as with the preceding five years, is focused on replacing (1) existing cast iron and bare steel mains, (2) associated services and meters, and (3) identified prone-to-failure vintage plastic piping. Columbia of Maryland’s IRIS mechanism recovers a return on investment, depreciation and property taxes of the STRIDE-eligible capital infrastructure statutorily capped at $2 per month for residential customers, and proportionally capped for commercial and industrial customer classes, and is reconciled to actual costs on an annual basis. Any over-collection or under-collection balance is passed back to, or recovered from, customers through the surcharge effective in May of the subsequent year.year, subject to the cap. STRIDE investments, and recovery thereof, are subject to prudency review by the Maryland PSC in the context of quarterly STRIDE update filings and in subsequent rate proceedings where STRIDE assets are rolled into rate base for recovery in base rates.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The following table describes the most recent vintage of our regulatory programs to recover infrastructure replacement and other federally-mandated compliance investments currently in rates and those pending commission approval:
| | | (in millions) | | | | | | |
| Company | Program | Incremental Revenue | Incremental Capital Investment | Investment Period | Filed | Status | Rates Effective | Program | Incremental Revenue | Incremental Capital Investment | Investment Period | Filed | Status | Rates Effective |
| Columbia of Ohio | IRP - 2018(1) | $ | 2.3 |
| $ | 207.0 |
| 1/17-12/17 | February 27, 2018 | Approved
April 25, 2018 | May 2018 | IRP - 2019(1) | $ | 18.2 |
| $ | 199.6 |
| 1/18-12/18 | February 28, 2019 | Approved
April 24, 2019 | May 2019 |
| Columbia of Ohio | | CEP - 2018 | $ | 74.5 |
| $ | 659.9 |
| 1/11-12/17 | December 1, 2017 | Approved
November 28, 2018 | December 2018 |
| Columbia of Ohio | | CEP - 2019 | $ | 15.0 |
| $ | 121.7 |
| 1/18-12/18 | February 28, 2019 | Approved
August 28, 2019 | September 2019 |
| NIPSCO - Gas | | TDSIC 9(1)(2) | $ | (10.6 | ) | $ | 54.4 |
| 1/18-6/18 | August 28, 2018 | Approved
December 27, 2018 | January 2019 |
| NIPSCO - Gas | | TDSIC 10(3) | $ | 1.6 |
| $ | 12.4 |
| 7/18-4/19 | June 25, 2019 | Approved
October 16, 2019 | November 2019 |
| NIPSCO - Gas | TDSIC 7 | $ | 1.5 |
| $ | 59.0 |
| 1/17-6/17 | August 31, 2017 | Approved
December 28, 2017 | January 2018 | TDSIC 11(4) | $ | (1.7 | ) | $ | 38.7 |
| 5/19-12/19 | February 25, 2020 | Order Expected June 2020 | July 2020 |
| NIPSCO - Gas | TDSIC 8 | $ | 1.8 |
| $ | 54.0 |
| 7/17-12/17 | February 27, 2018 | Approved
August 22, 2018 | September 2018 | FMCA 1(5) | $ | 9.9 |
| $ | 1.5 |
| 11/17-9/18 | November 30, 2018 | Approved
March 27, 2019 | April 2019 |
| NIPSCO - Gas | TDSIC 9(1)(2) | $ | (10.6 | ) | $ | 54.4 |
| 1/18 - 6/18 | August 28, 2018 | Approved
December 27, 2018 | January 2019 | FMCA 2(5) | $ | (3.5 | ) | $ | 1.8 |
| 10/18-3/19 | May 29, 2019 | Approved September 25, 2019 | October 2019 |
| NIPSCO - Gas | FMCA 1 | $ | 9.9 |
| $ | 1.5 |
| 11/17-9/18 | November 30, 2018 | Order Expected
Q1 2019 | April 2019 | FMCA 3(5) | $ | 0.3 |
| $ | 43.0 |
| 4/19-9/19 | November 26, 2019 | Order Expected March 2020 | April 2020 |
| Columbia of Massachusetts | GSEP - 2018(1)(3) | $ | 6.5 |
| $ | 80.0 |
| 1/18-12/18 | October 31, 2017 | Approved
April 30, 2018 | May 2018 | GSEP - 2019(6) | $ | 9.6 |
| $ | 36.0 |
| 1/19-12/19 | October 31, 2018 | Approved
April 30, 2019 | May 2019 |
| Columbia of Massachusetts | GSEP - 2019(4) | $ | 10.7 |
| $ | 64.0 |
| 1/19-12/19 | October 31, 2018 | Order expected
Q2 2019 | May 2019 | GSEP - 2020(6)(7) | $ | 2.4 |
| $ | 75.0 |
| 1/20-12/20 | October 31, 2019 | Order Expected April 2020 | May 2020 |
| Columbia of Pennsylvania | DSIC - 2018 | $ | 0.4 |
| $ | 14.8 |
| 12/17-2/18 | March 22, 2018 | Approved
March 29, 2018 | April 2018 | |
| Columbia of Pennsylvania | DSIC - 2018 | $ | 0.9 |
| $ | 31.8 |
| 3/18-5/18 | June 20, 2018 | Approved
June 28, 2018 | July 2018 | |
| Columbia of Pennsylvania | DSIC - 2018 | $ | 1.6 |
| $ | 55.4 |
| 6/18-8/18 | September 20, 2018 | Approved
September 28, 2018 | October 2018 | |
| Columbia of Virginia | SAVE - 2018 | $ | 2.9 |
| $ | 33.3 |
| 1/18-12/18 | August 18, 2017 | Approved
December 13, 2017 | January 2018 | SAVE - 2019 | $ | 2.4 |
| $ | 36.0 |
| 1/19-12/19 | August 17, 2018 | Approved
October 26, 2018 | January 2019 |
| Columbia of Virginia | SAVE - 2019 | $ | 2.4 |
| $ | 36.0 |
| 1/19-12/19 | August 17, 2018 | Approved
October 26, 2018 | January 2019 | SAVE - 2020 | $ | 3.8 |
| $ | 50.0 |
| 1/20-12/20 | August 15, 2019 | Approved December 6, 2019 | January 2020 |
| Columbia of Kentucky | AMRP - 2018 | $ | 4.5 |
| $ | 24.0 |
| 1/18-12/18 | October 13, 2017 | Approved
December 22, 2017 | January 2018 | AMRP - 2019 | $ | 3.6 |
| $ | 30.1 |
| 1/19-12/19 | October 15, 2018 | Approved
December 5, 2018 | January 2019 |
| Columbia of Kentucky | AMRP - 2019 | $ | 3.6 |
| $ | 30.1 |
| 1/19-12/19 | October 15, 2018 | Approved
December 5, 2018 | January 2019 | SMRP - 2020 | $ | 4.2 |
| $ | 40.4 |
| 1/20-12/20 | October 15, 2019 | Approved December 20, 2019 | January 2020 |
| Columbia of Maryland | STRIDE - 2018 | $ | 1.2 |
| $ | 20.8 |
| 1/18-12/18 | November 1, 2017 | Approved
December 20, 2017 | January 2018 | STRIDE - 2019 | $ | 1.2 |
| $ | 19.7 |
| 1/19-12/19 | November 1, 2018 | Approved
December 12, 2018 | January 2019 |
| Columbia of Maryland | STRIDE - 2019 | $ | 1.2 |
| $ | 19.7 |
| 1/19-12/19 | November 1, 2018 | Approved
December 12, 2018 | January 2019 | STRIDE - 2020 | $ | 1.3 |
| $ | 15.0 |
| 1/20-12/20 | January 29, 2020 | Approved
February 19, 2020 | February 2020 |
| NIPSCO - Electric | TDSIC - 3 | $ | (2.0 | ) | $ | 75.0 |
| 5/17-11/17 | January 30, 2018 | Approved
May 30, 2018 | June 2018 | TDSIC - 5(1) | $ | 15.9 |
| $ | 58.8 |
| 6/18-11/18 | January 29, 2019 | Approved
June 12, 2019 | June 2019 |
| NIPSCO - Electric | TDSIC - 4(1) | $ | (11.8 | ) | $ | 72.2 |
| 12/17-5/18 | July 31, 2018 | Approved
November 28, 2018 | December 2018 | TDSIC - 6 | $ | 28.1 |
| $ | 131.1 |
| 12/18-6/19 | August 21, 2019 | Approved December 18, 2019 | January 2020 |
| NIPSCO - Electric | TDSIC - 5(1) | $ | 15.9 |
| $ | 58.8 |
| 6/18-11/18 | January 29, 2019 | Order Expected
Q2 2019 | June 2019 | FMCA - 11(5) | $ | 0.9 |
| $ | 22.4 |
| 9/18-2/19 | April 17, 2019 | Approved
July 29, 2019 | August 2019 |
| NIPSCO - Electric | ECRM - 31 | $ | (2.1 | ) | $ | 2.9 |
| 6/17-12/17 | January 31, 2018 | Approved
April 25, 2018 | May 2018 | FMCA - 12(5) | $ | 1.6 |
| $ | 4.7 |
| 3/19-8/19 | October 18, 2019 | Approved
January 29, 2020 | February 2020 |
| NIPSCO - Electric | ECRM - 32 | $ | 1.0 |
| $ | — |
| 1/18-6/18 | July 31, 2018 | Approved
October 11, 2018 | November 2018 | |
| NIPSCO - Electric | FMCA - 8 | $ | 1.3 |
| $ | 4.4 |
| 4/17-9/17 | November 1, 2017 | Approved
January 31, 2018 | February 2018 | |
| NIPSCO - Electric | FMCA - 9 | $ | 4.1 |
| $ | 90.2 |
| 10/17-3/18 | April 27, 2018 | Approved
July 25, 2018 | August 2018 | |
| NIPSCO - Electric | FMCA - 10 | $ | 2.2 |
| $ | 45.7 |
| 4/18-8/18 | October 18, 2018 | Approved
January 29, 2019 | February 2019 | |
(1)Incremental revenue is net of amounts due back to customers as a result of the TCJA.
(2)Incremental revenue is net of $5.2 million of adjustments in the TDSIC-9 settlement.
(3)A cap waiver was approved byIncremental capital and revenue are net of amounts included in the step 2 rates.
(4)Incremental revenue is net of amounts included in the step 2 rates and reflects a more typical filing period.
(5)Incremental revenue is inclusive of tracker eligible operations and maintenance expense.
(6)Due to an order from the Massachusetts DPU on June 21, 2018October 3, 2019 imposing work restrictions on Columbia of Massachusetts, Columbia of Massachusetts did not meet the approved projected 2019 GSEP spend of $64 million and related rates became effective July 2018.associated incremental revenue of $10.7 million. In the 2020 GSEP, Columbia of Massachusetts reduced the projected capital spend for calendar year 2019 to $36 million and the associated incremental revenue in 2019 GSEP to $9.6 million.
(4)(7)The filing included a request for approval of a waiverIncremental capital investment is anticipated to allow collection ofbe lower than $75 million in 2020 due to the $2.9 million revenue requirement that exceeds the GSEP cap provision.Massachusetts DPU imposed work restrictions.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Rate Case Actions
The following table describes current rate case actions as applicable in each of our jurisdictions net of tracker impacts:
| | | (in millions) | | | | |
| Company | Requested Incremental Revenue | Approved Incremental Revenue | Filed | Status | Rates Effective | Requested Incremental Revenue | Approved Incremental Revenue | Filed | Status | Rates Effective |
NIPSCO - Gas(1) | $ | 138.1 |
| $ | 107.3 |
| September 27, 2017 | Approved
September 19, 2018 | October 2018 | $ | 138.1 |
| $ | 105.6 |
| September 27, 2017 | Approved
September 19, 2018 | October 2018 |
| Columbia of Massachusetts | $ | 24.1 |
| N/A |
| April 13, 2018 | Withdrawn
September 19, 2018 | N/A | |
| Columbia of Pennsylvania | $ | 46.9 |
| $ | 26.0 |
| March 16, 2018 | Approved
December 6, 2018 | December 2018 | |
Columbia of Virginia(2) | $ | 14.2 |
| In process |
| August 28, 2018 | Order expected
Second half of 2019 | February 2019 | $ | 14.2 |
| $ | 1.3 |
| August 28, 2018 | Approved
June 12, 2019 | February 2019 |
NIPSCO - Electric(3) | | $ | 21.4 |
| $ | (53.5 | ) | October 31, 2018 | Approved
December 4, 2019 | January 2020 |
| Columbia of Maryland | $ | 4.6 |
| $ | 2.2 |
| April 13, 2018 | Approved
November 21, 2018 | November 2018 | $ | 2.5 |
| $ | (0.1 | ) | May 22, 2019 | Approved
December 18, 2019 | December 2019 |
| NIPSCO - Electric | $ | 21.4 |
| In process |
| October 31, 2018 | Order expected
Q3 2019 | September 2019 | |
(1)Rates will bewere implemented in three steps, with implementation of step 1 rates effective October 1, 2018. Step 2 rates will bewere effective on or about March 1, 2019, and step 3 rates will bewere effective on January 1, 2020. The step 3 increase was approved based on actual information and revised from $107.3 million to $105.6 million. The IURC’s order also dismissed NIPSCO from phase 2 of the IURC’s TCJA investigation.
(2)Rates, as originally filed, were implemented in February 2019 on an interim basis, subject to refund pendingrefund. The final approved rates, which replaced interim rates, were implemented in July 2019.
(3)An order was received on December 4, 2019, which included the resolution of outstanding TCJA impacts to rates. Incremental revenues decreased due to a final order fromreduction in fuel costs associated with the VSCC.new industrial service structure. Rates will be implemented in two steps, with implementation of step 1 rates effective January 2, 2020 and step 2 rates effective March 2, 2020.
Additional Regulatory Matters
Columbia of Ohio. On December 1, 2017, Columbia of Ohio filed an application that requested authority to implement a rider to begin recovering plant and associated deferrals related to its CEP. The CEP was established in 2011 and allows for deferral of interest, depreciation and property taxes on certain plant investments not recovered through its IRP modernization tracker. The application requested authority to increase annual revenues, through the requested rider, by approximately $70 million, with biennial increases up to approximately $98 million in 2022. On May 9, 2018, the PUCO appointed an independent auditor to assist the PUCO with the review of the accounting accuracy, prudency and compliance of Columbia of Ohio with its PUCO-approved CEP deferrals. The independent audit report was filed on September 4, 2018 and the PUCO Staff's Report on the investigation was filed on September 14, 2018. On October 25, 2018, a joint stipulation and recommendation was filed recommending an initial revenue requirement of $74.5 million to recover CEP investments and deferrals through December 31, 2017, with annual adjustments for capital investments made in subsequent years. Additionally, the signatory parties to the stipulation agreed to a reduction in rates to adjust for the impacts of the TCJA and for a base rate case filing to be made by Columbia of Ohio with a test period of calendar year 2021. On November 28, 2018 the PUCO issued an order unanimously approving the settlement filed on October 25, 2018, without modification, for rates effective beginning November 29, 2018. This order finalizes Columbia of Ohio's TCJA resolution related to the CEP tracker, as well as base rates.
NIPSCO Gas. On November 8, 2017, NIPSCO filed a petition with the IURC seeking approval of NIPSCO’s federally mandated pipeline safety compliance plan. As part of the settlement agreement filed in NIPSCO’s gas base rate case proceeding, NIPSCO and the parties to the settlement agreement settled all issues in this proceeding as well, including moving certain costs from the base rate proceeding to this pipeline safety compliance plan. The updated four year compliance plan includes a total estimated $91.5 million of capital costs and $35.5 million of expected operating and maintenance costs. NIPSCO received approval for accounting and rate-making relief, including establishment of a periodic rate adjustment mechanism. NIPSCO filed the first tracker proceeding in this case on November 30, 2018. On December 31, 2018, NIPSCO filed a petition with the IURC seeking approval of an additional PHMSA compliance plan including capital expenditures of $228.8 million. An IURC order is expected in the second half of 2019.
On January 3, 2018, the IURC initiated an investigation to review and consider the possible implications of the TCJA on utility rates. The IURC ordered a two phase investigation. Phase 1 solely dealt with the prospective changes in rates to reflect the change in tax rates. In accordance with the procedural schedule, on March 26, 2018, NIPSCO filed revised gas tariffs reflecting the impact of the change in tax rate for its applicable rates and charges. The IURC approved NIPSCO's Phase 1 filing on April 26, 2018. The revised tariffs were effective May 1, 2018. The stipulation and settlement agreement filed on April 20, 2018, in NIPSCO’s gas rate case resolved all issues in Phase 2, including the return of excess income tax revenue recovered through its base rates and any
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
applicable charges between January 1, 2018 and April 30, 2018. Beginning January 2019, and continuing through June 2019, NIPSCO is passing back the excess tax expense through the TDSIC mechanism.
On December 27, 2018, the IURC issued an order for TDSIC-9 approving the settlement agreement filed on November 4, 2018. This order, along with the Court of Appeals dismissal on December 31, 2018 and January 8, 2019, resolved all outstanding issues related to the appeals of TDSIC-4 though TDSIC-8.
Columbia of Massachusetts. On October 9, 2018, Columbia of Massachusetts filed an application with the Massachusetts DPU, seeking authority to pass back approximately $95.8 million in excess deferred taxes associated with TCJA with an effective date of rates to be determined by the Massachusetts DPU. On December 21, 2018 the Massachusetts DPU issued an order approving the treatment of TCJA-related excess deferred taxes. Columbia Gas of Massachusetts filed a compliance filing on January 4, 2019, reflecting revised LDAF rates inclusive of credit factors to return excess deferred taxes associated with TCJA to customers for rates effective on February 1, 2019, per the Massachusetts DPU’s order.
Columbia of Kentucky. On April 30, 2018, Columbia of Kentucky received an order from the Kentucky PSC requiring implementation of interim proposed rates effective May 1, 2018 reflecting the impact of TCJA subject to future adjustment. The order directed Columbia of Kentucky to file, by September 1, 2018, revised TCJA adjustment factors reflecting the tax expense savings from January 1, 2018 through April 30, 2018, and an estimate of the annual reduction due to the excess deferred taxes to be effective with the first billing cycle of October 2018. On August 31, 2018, Columbia of Kentucky filed updated rate schedules with the Kentucky PSC for rates proposed to be effective October 1, 2018. On October 25, 2018, the Kentucky PSC authorized the TCJA adjustment factors, as proposed, with an October 29, 2018 effective date to pass-back the overcollection of taxes over a six month period.
Columbia of Maryland. On February 13, 2018, Columbia of Maryland filed a proposal with the Maryland PSC to reduce rates as a result of TCJA with an annual revenue decrease of $1.3 million. Columbia of Maryland was directed to account for any revenues associated with the difference between previous and current income tax rates and excess deferred taxes as regulatory liabilities effective January 1, 2018. On March 14, 2018, Columbia of Maryland received approval, effective April 2, 2018, to implement new rates and pass-back the overcollection of taxes from the first quarter of 2018 over a seven month period.
NIPSCO Electric. On October 31, 2018, NIPSCO submitted its 2018 Integrated Resource Plan with the IURC. The plan evaluated demand-side and supply-side resource alternatives to reliably and cost effectively meet NIPSCO customers' future energy requirements over the ensuing 20 years. Refer to Note 18-E, "Other Matters," in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
On March 29, 2018, WCE, which is currently owned by BP p.l.c ("BP") and BP Products North America, which operates the BP Refinery, filed a petition at the IURC asking that the combined operations of WCE and BP be treated as a single premise, and the WCE generation be dedicated primarily to BP Refinery operations beginning in May 2019 as WCE has self-certified as a qualifying facility at FERC. BP Refinery planned to continue to purchase electric service from NIPSCO at a reduced demand level beginning in May 2019. A2019; however, a settlement agreement was filed on November 2, 2018 agreeing that BP and WCE would not move forward with construction of a private transmission line to serve BP until conclusion of NIPSCO’s pending electric rate case.
The IURC approved the settlement agreement as filed on February 20, 2019. On February 1, 2018, NIPSCO and certain other MISO transmission owners filed withDecember 4, 2019, the FERC a request for waiver of tariff provisions to allow for implementation of TCJA tax rate change provisions into 2018 transmission formula rates. On March 15, 2018, the FERCIURC issued an order grantingin the request for waiver and setelectric rate case approving the effective dateimplementation of a new industrial service structure. This resolved the issues included in BP’s original petition.
The December 4, 2019 electric rate case order approved the revenue requirement settlement filed in the case, with the exception of a change in the agreed to return on equity; the approved return on equity is 9.75%. The order included approval of the waiver at January 1, 2018. Indepreciation rates as requested, as well as authorization to create a regulatory asset upon the March billing cycle,retirement of R.M. Schahfer Generating Units 14, 15, 17 and 18 and Michigan City Generating Station Unit 12. The order allows for the MISO began billingrecovery of and on the new transmission rates reflecting the lower federal tax rate. In addition, the MISO began to re-bill January and February 2018 affected revenues and costs in the March 2018 billing cycle, and completed the re-settlement in the April 2018 billing cycle. The new 2018 transmission formula rates will reduce revenue by $8.5 million in 2018 associated with NIPSCO's multi-value projects. Additionally, on November 1, 2018, MISO submitted revised tariffs to provide for adjustments to income tax, including accumulated deferred income tax, resulting from tax law or rate changes. On December 20, 2018, FERC accepted the submission, effective January 1, 2019, as requested.
As noted above in the NIPSCO Gas regulatory matters, the IURC initiated an investigation on January 3, 2018, to review and consider the implicationsnet book value of the TCJA on utility rates. The commission ordered a two phase investigation. Phase 1 solely dealt withunits by the prospective changes in rates to reflect the change in tax rates. On March 26, 2018, NIPSCO filed revised electric tariffs reflecting the impactend of the change in tax rate for its applicable rates and charges. The IURC approved NIPSCO's phase 1 filing on April 26, 2018. The revised tariffs were effective May 1, 2018. On July 31, 2018, NIPSCO filed an unopposed motion requesting that the over-collection of income taxes from January 1, 2018 through April 30, 2018 be passed back in NIPSCO’s TDSIC-4 filing,
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
also filed on July 31, 2018, and requesting that all other phase 2 issues be handled in a rate case filing to be made in the fourth quarter of 2018. On August 15, 2018, the IURC approved the motion to pass back the over-collection through the TDSIC-4 rates effective December 2018 through May 2019. All other phase 2 issues are addressed in the base rate case filed October 31, 2018.
2032.
| |
9. | 9. Risk Management Activities |
We are exposed to certain risks relating to ongoing business operations; namely commodity price risk and interest rate risk. We recognize that the prudent and selective use of derivatives may help to lower our cost of debt capital, manage interest rate exposure and limit volatility in the price of natural gas.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Risk management assets and liabilities on our derivatives are presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as shown below:
| | December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
Risk Management Assets - Current(1) | | | | | | |
| Interest rate risk programs | $ | — |
| | $ | 14.0 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Commodity price risk programs | 1.1 |
| | 0.5 |
| 0.6 |
| | 1.1 |
|
| Total | $ | 1.1 |
| | $ | 14.5 |
| $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 1.1 |
|
Risk Management Assets - Noncurrent(2) | | | | | | |
| Interest rate risk programs | $ | 18.5 |
| | $ | 5.6 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 18.5 |
|
| Commodity price risk programs | 4.4 |
| | 1.0 |
| 3.8 |
| | 4.4 |
|
| Total | $ | 22.9 |
| | $ | 6.6 |
| $ | 3.8 |
| | $ | 22.9 |
|
Risk Management Liabilities - Current | | | | | | |
| Interest rate risk programs | $ | — |
| | $ | 38.6 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Commodity price risk programs | 5.0 |
| | 4.6 |
| 12.6 |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Total | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 43.2 |
| $ | 12.6 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
|
| Risk Management Liabilities - Noncurrent | | | | | | |
| Interest rate risk programs | $ | 9.5 |
| | $ | — |
| $ | 76.2 |
| | $ | 9.5 |
|
| Commodity price risk programs | 37.2 |
| | 28.5 |
| 57.8 |
| | 37.2 |
|
| Total | $ | 46.7 |
| | $ | 28.5 |
| $ | 134.0 |
| | $ | 46.7 |
|
(1)Presented in "Prepayments and other" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)Presented in "Deferred charges and other" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(3)Presented in "Other accruals" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Commodity Price Risk Management
We, along with our utility customers, are exposed to variability in cash flows associated with natural gas purchases and volatility in natural gas prices. We purchase natural gas for sale and delivery to our retail, commercial and industrial customers, and for most customers the variability in the market price of gas is passed through in their rates. Some of our utility subsidiaries offer programs whereby variability in the market price of gas is assumed by the respective utility. The objective of our commodity price risk programs is to mitigate the gas cost variability, for us or on behalf of our customers, associated with natural gas purchases or sales by economically hedging the various gas cost components using a combination of futures, options, forwards or other derivative contracts.
NIPSCO received IURC approval to lock in a fixed price for its natural gas customers using long-term forward purchase instruments. The term of these instruments range from five to ten years and is limited to twenty20 percent of NIPSCO’s average annual GCA purchase volume. Gains and losses on these derivative contracts are deferred as regulatory liabilities or assets and are remitted to or collected from customers through NIPSCO’s quarterly GCA mechanism. These instruments are not designated as accounting hedges.
Interest Rate Risk Management
As of December 31, 2018,2019, we have forward-starting interest rate swaps with an aggregate notional value totaling $500.0 million to hedge the variability in cash flows attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate during the periods from the effective dates of the swaps to the anticipated dates of forecasted debt issuances, which are expected to take place by the end of 2024. These interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges. The effective portions of the gains and losses related to these swaps are
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
recorded to AOCI and are recognized in "Interest expense, net" concurrently with the recognition of interest expense on the associated debt, once issued. If it becomes probable that a hedged forecasted transaction will no longer occur, the accumulated gains or losses on the derivative will be recognized currently in "Other, net" in the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss).
The passage of the TCJA and Greater Lawrence Incident led to significant changes to our long-term financing plan. As a result, during 2018, we settled forward-starting interest rate swaps with a notional value of $750.0 million. These derivative contracts were accounted for as cash flow hedges. As part of the transactions, the associated net unrealized gain of $46.2 million was recognized immediately in "Other, net" on the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) due to the probability associated with the forecasted borrowing transactions no longer occurring.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
There were no0 amounts excluded from effectiveness testing for derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships at December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016.2017.
Our derivative instruments measured at fair value as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 do not contain any credit-risk-related contingent features.
10. Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the President signed into law the TCJA, which, among other things, enacted significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code, as amended, including a reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, and certain other provisions related specifically to the public utility industry, including the continuation of certain interest expense deductibility. These changes were effective January 1, 2018. Under GAAP, the effects of a change in tax law are recorded as a discrete item in the period of enactment.Income Tax Expense
Rates for our regulated customers include provisions for the collection of U.S. federal income taxes. Accordingly, accounting effects related to changes in tax rates here that would normally be recognized as a componentThe components of income tax expense may instead be deferred(benefit) were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Income Taxes | | | | | |
| Current | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| State | 5.2 |
| | 8.2 |
| | 7.8 |
|
| Total Current | 5.2 |
| | 8.2 |
| | 7.8 |
|
| Deferred | | | | | |
| Federal | 110.7 |
| | (209.4 | ) | | 302.7 |
|
| State | 9.0 |
| | 22.2 |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Total Deferred | 119.7 |
| | (187.2 | ) | | 307.7 |
|
| Deferred Investment Credits | (1.4 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | (1.0 | ) |
| Income Taxes | $ | 123.5 |
| | $ | (180.0 | ) | | $ | 314.5 |
|
Statutory Rate Reconciliation
The following table represents a regulatory asset or liability and reflected in future rate-making. In December 2017, we remeasured our deferredreconciliation of income tax assets and liabilitiesexpense at the statutory federal income tax rate to the new federal corporateactual income tax rate. expense from continuing operations:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Book income (loss) before income taxes | $ | 506.6 |
| | | | $ | (230.6 | ) | | | | $ | 443.0 |
| | |
| Tax expense (benefit) at statutory federal income tax rate | 106.5 |
| | 21.0 | % | | (48.4 | ) | | 21.0 | % | | 155.0 |
| | 35.0 | % |
| Increases (reductions) in taxes resulting from: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 10.1 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 24.7 |
| | (10.7 | ) | | 6.9 |
| | 1.5 |
|
| Amortization of regulatory liabilities | (29.4 | ) | | (5.8 | ) | | (29.3 | ) | | 12.7 |
| | (2.4 | ) | | (0.5 | ) |
| Goodwill impairment | 43.0 |
| | 8.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fines and penalties | 11.5 |
| | 2.3 |
| | 0.2 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 2.8 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Charitable contribution carryover | (2.5 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (1.2 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
| State regulatory proceedings | (9.5 | ) | | (1.9 | ) | | (127.8 | ) | | 55.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Remeasurement due to TCJA | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 161.1 |
| | 36.4 |
|
| Employee stock ownership plan dividends and other compensation | (2.0 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | (2.2 | ) | | 1.0 |
| | (6.5 | ) | | (1.5 | ) |
| Other adjustments | (4.2 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | 2.8 |
| | (1.2 | ) | | (1.2 | ) | | (0.2 | ) |
| Income Taxes | $ | 123.5 |
| | 24.4 | % | | $ | (180.0 | ) | | 78.1 | % | | $ | 314.5 |
| | 71.0 | % |
The effective income tax rates were 24.4%, 78.1% and 71.0% in 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The 53.7% decrease in effective tax rate in 2019 versus 2018 was primarily the result of this remeasurement was a reductionnot having significant income tax decreases resulting from state regulatory proceedings as in the net deferred tax liability of approximately $1.3 billion, including approximately $0.4 billion of regulatory "gross up" to account for over-collection of past taxes from customers. Offsetting the reduction in net deferred tax liabilities2018. Additionally, there was an increase in regulatory liabilities of approximately $1.5 billion and an increase in incomethe effective tax expense of $0.2 billion. In 2018, we received regulatory orders from most of the jurisdictions in which we operate regarding the treatment and pass back of excess deferred taxes. As a result of these orders we reduced our regulatory liabilityrate related to excess deferred income taxes by $120.7 million (netthe non-cash impairment of tax). This adjustment is reflectedgoodwill in "Income Taxes" on our Consolidated Statements2019 related to Columbia of Income (Loss).Massachusetts (see Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" for additional information)
On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”), which provides guidance on accounting for tax effects of the TCJA. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the TCJA enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. There were no adjustments recorded in the SAB 118 remeasurement period in 2018.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
and non-deductible fines and penalties related to the Greater Lawrence Incident (see Note 19, "Legal Proceedings" for additional information). The componentsrate is also impacted by the relative impact of income tax expense (benefit) were as follows:permanent differences on higher pre-tax income.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Income Taxes | | | | | |
| Current | | | | | |
| Federal | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| State | 8.2 |
| | 7.8 |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Total Current | 8.2 |
| | 7.8 |
| | (0.1 | ) |
| Deferred | | | | | |
| Federal | (209.4 | ) | | 302.7 |
| | 165.6 |
|
| State | 22.2 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 18.0 |
|
| Total Deferred | (187.2 | ) | | 307.7 |
| | 183.6 |
|
| Deferred Investment Credits | (1.0 | ) | | (1.0 | ) | | (1.4 | ) |
| Income Taxes | $ | (180.0 | ) | | $ | 314.5 |
| | $ | 182.1 |
|
Total income taxes were different from the amount that would be computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to book income before income tax. The major reasons for this difference were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Book income (loss) before income taxes | $ | (230.6 | ) | | | | $ | 443.0 |
| | | | $ | 513.6 |
| | |
| Tax expense (benefit) at statutory federal income tax rate | (48.4 | ) | | 21.0 | % | | 155.0 |
| | 35.0 | % | | 179.8 |
| | 35.0 | % |
| Increases (reductions) in taxes resulting from: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| State income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit | 24.7 |
| | (10.7 | ) | | 6.9 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 11.3 |
| | 2.2 |
|
| Amortization of regulatory liabilities | (29.3 | ) | | 12.7 |
| | (2.4 | ) | | (0.5 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | (0.3 | ) |
| Charitable contribution carryover | — |
| | — |
| | (1.2 | ) | | (0.3 | ) | | 2.8 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| State regulatory proceedings | (127.8 | ) | | 55.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Remeasurement due to TCJA | — |
| | — |
| | 161.1 |
| | 36.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Employee stock ownership plan dividends and other compensation | (2.2 | ) | | 1.0 |
| | (6.5 | ) | | (1.5 | ) | | (9.5 | ) | | (1.8 | ) |
| Other adjustments | 3.0 |
| | (1.3 | ) | | 1.6 |
| | 0.4 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | (0.1 | ) |
| Income Taxes | $ | (180.0 | ) | | 78.1 | % | | $ | 314.5 |
| | 71.0 | % | | $ | 182.1 |
| | 35.5 | % |
The effective income tax rates were 78.1%, 71.0% and 35.5% in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The 7.1% increase in the overall effective tax rate in 2018 versus 2017 was primarily the result of state regulatory proceedings which resulted in a $127.8 million decrease in federal income taxes offset by a related increase in state income taxes of $7.1 million. Additionally, the increase was driven by a $26.9 million decrease in income taxes related to amortization of the regulatory liability primarily associated with excess deferred taxes.
The 35.5% increase in the overall effective tax rate in 2017 versus 2016 was primarily the result of a $161.1 million increase in income taxes related to implementing the provisions of the TCJA. The charge to income tax expense resulting from implementation of the TCJA relates primarily to remeasurement of parent company deferred tax assets for NOL carryforwards.Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Among other provisions, the standard requires that all income tax effects of awards are recognized in the income statement when the awards vest and are distributed.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. The principal components of our net deferred tax liability were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | | | |
| Accelerated depreciation and other property differences | $ | 2,516.9 |
| | $ | 2,458.0 |
|
| Other regulatory assets | 381.5 |
| | 375.4 |
|
| Total Deferred Tax Liabilities | 2,898.4 |
| | 2,833.4 |
|
| Deferred tax assets | | | |
| Other regulatory liabilities and deferred investment tax credits (including TCJA) | 336.1 |
| | 365.5 |
|
| Pension and other postretirement/postemployment benefits | 152.1 |
| | 157.5 |
|
| Net operating loss carryforward and AMT credit carryforward | 765.9 |
| | 849.8 |
|
| Environmental liabilities | 25.4 |
| | 24.4 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 35.3 |
| | 37.5 |
|
| Other, net | 98.3 |
| | 68.2 |
|
| Total Deferred Tax Assets | 1,413.1 |
| | 1,502.9 |
|
| Net Deferred Tax Liabilities | $ | 1,485.3 |
| | $ | 1,330.5 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Deferred tax liabilities | | | |
| Accelerated depreciation and other property differences | $ | 2,458.0 |
| | $ | 2,260.7 |
|
| Other regulatory assets | 375.4 |
| | 309.5 |
|
| Total Deferred Tax Liabilities | 2,833.4 |
| | 2,570.2 |
|
| Deferred tax assets | | | |
| Other regulatory liabilities and deferred investment tax credits (including TCJA) | 365.5 |
| | 406.0 |
|
| Pension and other postretirement/postemployment benefits | 157.5 |
| | 136.7 |
|
| Net operating loss carryforward and AMT credit carryforward | 849.8 |
| | 576.0 |
|
| Environmental liabilities | 24.4 |
| | 24.0 |
|
| Other accrued liabilities | 37.5 |
| | 37.2 |
|
| Other, net | 68.2 |
| | 97.4 |
|
| Total Deferred Tax Assets | 1,502.9 |
| | 1,277.3 |
|
| Net Deferred Tax Liabilities | $ | 1,330.5 |
| | $ | 1,292.9 |
|
State income taxAt December 31, 2019, we had $657.1 million of federal net operating loss benefitscarryforwards. The federal net operating loss carryforwards are recorded at their realizable value.available to offset taxable income and will begin to expire in 2028. We anticipatealso have $1.6 million of federal alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards which do not expire. In addition, we have $1.4 million in charitable contribution carryforwards to offset future taxable income, which begin to expire in 2023. We also have $107.2 million (net) of state net operating loss carryforwards. Depending on the jurisdiction in which the state net operating loss was generated, the carryforwards will begin to expire in 2028. We believe it is more likely than not that we will realize $88.5 million and $65.8 million of these tax benefits as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, prior to their expiration. These tax benefits are primarily related to Indiana, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania. The remainingthe benefit from the state net operating loss carryforwardcarryforwards.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits represent a federal carryforward of $759.6 million ($508.5 million of which relates to yearsis as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Reconciliation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Unrecognized Tax Benefits - Opening Balance | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 1.4 |
| | $ | 2.6 |
|
| Gross decreases - tax positions in prior period | (0.6 | ) | | (0.4 | ) | | (1.4 | ) |
| Gross increases - current period tax positions | 22.6 |
| | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
|
| Unrecognized Tax Benefits - Ending Balance | $ | 23.2 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 1.4 |
|
| Offset for net operating loss carryforwards | (22.6 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Balance - Less Net Operating Loss Carryforwards | $ | 0.6 |
| | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | 1.4 |
|
In 2019, we resolved prior to the implementation of the TCJA) and an Alternative Minimum Tax credit of $1.7 million. The carryforward periods for pre-TCJAunrecognized tax benefits expire in various tax years from 2028 to 2037. Per the TCJA, federal NOL carryforwards generated after December 31, 2017 do not expire, but are limited to 80% of current year taxable income.
Unrecognized$0.6 million and established new unrecognized tax benefits for the periods reported are immaterial.related to state matters of $22.6 million. We present accrued interest on unrecognized tax benefits, accrued interest on other income tax liabilities and tax penalties in "Income Taxes" on our Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss). Interest expense recorded on unrecognized tax benefits and other income tax liabilities was immaterial for all periods presented. There were no0 accruals for penalties recorded in the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, and there were no0 balances for accrued penalties recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
We are subject to income taxation in the United States and various state jurisdictions;jurisdictions, primarily Indiana, Pennsylvania, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Maryland and Virginia.
We participate in the IRS CAP which provides the opportunity to resolve tax matters with the IRS before filing each year's consolidated federal income tax return. As of December 31, 2018,2019, tax years through 20172018 have been audited and are effectively closed to further assessment. The audit of tax year 20182019 under the CAP program is expected to be completed in 2019.2020.
The statute of limitations in each of the state jurisdictions in which we operate remains open until the years are settled for federal income tax purposes, at which time amended state income tax returns reflecting all federal income tax adjustments are filed. As of December 31, 2018,2019, there were no state income tax audits in progress that would have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
In December 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law. As a result of the implementation of the TCJA, we remeasured deferred taxes and recognized $161.1 million of income tax expense in our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2017. The result of this remeasurement was a reduction in the net deferred tax liability of approximately $1.3 billion, including approximately $0.4 billion of regulatory "gross up" to account for over collection of past taxes from customers. Offsetting the reduction in net deferred tax liabilities was an increase in regulatory liabilities of approximately $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2017. In 2018, we received regulatory orders on the treatment of excess deferred taxes from the jurisdictions in which we operate. As a result of these orders, we reduced our regulatory liability related to excess deferred income taxes by $120.7 million (net of tax). This adjustment is reflected in "Income Taxes" on our Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) for the year ended December 31, 2018.
As of December 31, 2019, we received approval from regulators to return excess deferred taxes in all of our jurisdictions in accordance with regulatory proceedings.
78On December 22, 2017, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 ("SAB 118"), which provides guidance on accounting for tax effects of the TCJA. SAB 118 provides a measurement period that should not extend beyond one year from the TCJA enactment date for companies to complete the accounting under ASC 740. There were no adjustments recorded in the SAB 118 remeasurement period in 2018.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
| |
11. | Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits |
We provide defined contribution plans and noncontributory defined benefit retirement plans that cover certain of our employees. Benefits under the defined benefit retirement plans reflect the employees’ compensation, years of service and age at retirement. Additionally, we provide health care and life insurance benefits for certain retired employees. The majority of employees may become eligible for these benefits if they reach retirement age while working for us. The expected cost of such benefits is accrued during the employees’ years of service. Current rates of rate-regulated companies include postretirement benefit costs, including amortization of the regulatory assets that arose prior to inclusion of these costs in rates. For most plans, cash contributions are remitted to grantor trusts.
Our Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans’ Asset Management. We employ a liability-driven investing strategy for the pension plan, as noted below. A mix of equities and fixed income investments are used to maximize the long-term return of plan assets and hedge the liabilities at a prudent level of risk. We utilize a total return investment approach for the other postretirement benefit plans. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded status, and asset class volatility. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed income investments. Furthermore, equity investments are diversified across U.S. and non-U.S. stocks, as well as growth, value, small and large capitalizations. Other assets such as private equity funds are used judiciously to enhance long-term returns while improving portfolio diversification. Derivatives may be used to gain market exposure in an efficient and timely manner; however, derivatives may not be used to leverage the portfolio beyond the market value of the underlying assets. Investment risk is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through quarterly investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements, and periodic asset/liability studies.
We utilize a building block approach with proper consideration of diversification and rebalancing in determining the long-term rate of return for plan assets. Historical markets are studied and long-term historical relationships between equities and fixed income are analyzed to ensure that they are consistent with the widely accepted capital market principle that assets with higher volatility generate greater return over the long run. Current market factors, such as inflation and interest rates, are evaluated before long-term capital market assumptions are determined. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed to check for reasonability and appropriateness.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The most important component of an investment strategy is the portfolio asset mix, or the allocation between the various classes of securities available to the pension and other postretirement benefit plans for investment purposes. The asset mix and acceptable minimum and maximum ranges established for our plan assets represents a long-term view and are listed in the table below.
In 2012, a dynamic asset allocation policy for the pension fund was approved. This policy calls for a gradual reduction in the allocation of return-seeking assets (equities, real estate and private equity) and a corresponding increase in the allocation of liability-hedging assets (fixed income) as the funded status of the plans increase above 90% (as measured by the market value of qualified pension plan assets divided by the projected benefit obligations of the qualified pension plans). During 2017, a $277 million discretionary contribution was made to the pension plans. A new asset-liability study was completed in 2018 resulting in a more conservative glide path and an increase in the allocation to liability-hedging assets held in the portfolio.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, the asset mix and acceptable minimum and maximum ranges established by the policy for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans are as follows:
Asset Mix Policy of Funds:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Defined Benefit Pension Plan | | Postretirement Benefit Plan |
| Asset Category | Minimum | | Maximum | | Minimum | | Maximum |
| Domestic Equities | 12% | | 32% | | 0% | | 55% |
| International Equities | 6% | | 16% | | 0% | | 25% |
| Fixed Income | 59% | | 71% | | 20% | | 100% |
| Real Estate | 0% | | 7% | | 0% | | 0% |
| Short-Term Investments/Other | 0% | | 15% | | 0% | | 10% |
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
As of December 31, 2017,2018, the asset mix and acceptable minimum and maximum ranges established by the policy for the pension and other postretirement benefit plans were as follows:
Asset Mix Policy of Funds:
| | | | Defined Benefit Pension Plan | | Postretirement Benefit Plan | Defined Benefit Pension Plan | | Postretirement Benefit Plan |
| Asset Category | Minimum | | Maximum | | Minimum | | Maximum | Minimum | | Maximum | | Minimum | | Maximum |
| Domestic Equities | 16% | | 36% | | 0% | | 55% | 12% | | 32% | | 0% | | 55% |
| International Equities | 8% | | 18% | | 0% | | 25% | 6% | | 16% | | 0% | | 25% |
| Fixed Income | 39% | | 51% | | 20% | | 100% | 59% | | 71% | | 20% | | 100% |
| Diversified Credit | 0% | | 13% | | 0% | | 0% | |
| Real Estate | 0% | | 13% | | 0% | | 0% | 0% | | 7% | | 0% | | 0% |
| Short-Term Investments | 0% | | 10% | | 0% | | 10% | |
| Short-Term Investments/Other | | 0% | | 15% | | 0% | | 10% |
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Pension Plan and Postretirement Plan Asset Mix at December 31, 20182019 and December 31, 20172018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Defined Benefit Pension Assets | | December 31,
2019 | | Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets | | December 31,
2019 |
Asset Class (in millions) | Asset Value | | % of Total Assets | | Asset Value | | % of Total Assets |
| Domestic Equities | $ | 446.4 |
| | 21.5 | % | | $ | 93.8 |
| | 35.9 | % |
| International Equities | 205.0 |
| | 9.9 | % | | 40.7 |
| | 15.6 | % |
| Fixed Income | 1,337.2 |
| | 64.2 | % | | 119.5 |
| | 45.7 | % |
| Real Estate | 53.9 |
| | 2.6 | % | | — |
| | — |
|
| Cash/Other | 38.4 |
| | 1.8 | % | | 7.4 |
| | 2.8 | % |
| Total | $ | 2,080.9 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 261.4 |
| | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Defined Benefit Pension Assets | | December 31,
2018 | | Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets | | December 31,
2018 |
Asset Class (in millions) | Asset Value | | % of Total Assets | | Asset Value | | % of Total Assets |
| Domestic Equities | $ | 355.5 |
| | 19.0 | % | | $ | 78.8 |
| | 36.4 | % |
| International Equities | 165.5 |
| | 8.9 | % | | 17.5 |
| | 8.1 | % |
| Fixed Income | 1,241.9 |
| | 66.5 | % | | 115.1 |
| | 53.2 | % |
| Real Estate | 52.7 |
| | 2.8 | % | | — |
| | — |
|
| Cash/Other | 52.1 |
| | 2.8 | % | | 4.9 |
| | 2.3 | % |
| Total | $ | 1,867.7 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 216.3 |
| | 100.0 | % |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Defined Benefit Pension Assets | | December 31,
2018 | | Postretirement
Benefit Plan Assets | | December 31,
2018 |
Asset Class (in millions) | Asset Value | | % of Total Assets | | Asset Value | | % of Total Assets |
| Domestic Equities | $ | 355.5 |
| | 19.0 | % | | $ | 78.8 |
| | 36.4 | % |
| International Equities | 165.5 |
| | 8.9 | % | | 17.5 |
| | 8.1 | % |
| Fixed Income | 1,241.9 |
| | 66.5 | % | | 115.1 |
| | 53.2 | % |
| Real Estate | 52.7 |
| | 2.8 | % | | — |
| | — |
|
| Cash/Other | 52.1 |
| | 2.8 | % | | 4.9 |
| | 2.3 | % |
| Total | $ | 1,867.7 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 216.3 |
| | 100.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | |
| | Defined Benefit Pension Assets | | December 31,
2017 | | Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets | | December 31,
2017 |
Asset Class (in millions) | Asset Value | | % of Total Assets | | Asset Value | | % of Total Assets |
| Domestic Equities | $ | 698.2 |
| | 32.3 | % | | $ | 96.0 |
| | 36.6 | % |
| International Equities | 351.0 |
| | 16.2 | % | | 39.8 |
| | 15.2 | % |
| Fixed Income | 977.6 |
| | 45.3 | % | | 117.5 |
| | 44.8 | % |
| Real Estate | 49.9 |
| | 2.3 | % | | — |
| | — |
|
| Cash/Other | 83.3 |
| | 3.9 | % | | 9.2 |
| | 3.4 | % |
| Total | $ | 2,160.0 |
| | 100.0 | % | | $ | 262.5 |
| | 100.0 | % |
The categorization of investments into the asset classes in the table above are based on definitions established by our Benefits Committee.
Fair Value Measurements. The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Master Trust and other postretirement benefits investment assets at fair value as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Total Master Trust and other postretirement benefits investment assets at fair value classified within Level 3 were $86.1$0 million and $98.9$86.1 million as of December 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017,2018, respectively. Such amounts were approximately 0% and 4% of the Master Trust and other postretirement benefits’ total investments as reported on the statement of net assets available for benefits at fair value as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
respectively.
Valuation Techniques Used to Determine Fair Value:
Level 1 Measurements
Most common and preferred stocks are traded in active markets on national and international securities exchanges and are valued at closing prices on the last business day of each period presented. Cash is stated at cost which approximates fair value, with the exception of cash held in foreign currencies which fluctuates with changes in the exchange rates. Short-term bills and notes are priced based on quoted market values.
Level 2 Measurements
Most U.S. Government Agency obligations, mortgage/asset-backed securities, and corporate fixed income securities are generally valued by benchmarking model-derived prices to quoted market prices and trade data for identical or comparable securities. To the extent that quoted prices are not available, fair value is determined based on a valuation model that includes inputs such as interest rate yield curves and credit spreads. Securities traded in markets that are not considered active are valued based on quoted market prices, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Other fixed income includes futures and options which are priced on bid valuation or settlement pricing.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Level 3 Measurements
Private equity investment strategies include buy-out, venture capital, growth equity, distressed debt,Investments with unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and mezzanine debt. Private equity investmentsthat are held through limited partnerships.
Limited partnerships are valued at estimated fair market value based on their proportionate share ofsignificant to the partnership's fair value as recorded in the partnerships' audited financial statements. Partnership interests represent ownership interests in private equity funds and real estate funds. Real estate partnerships invest in natural resources, commercial real estate and distressed real estate. The fair value of these investments is determined by reference to the funds' underlying assets whichand liabilities are principally securities, private businesses, and real estate properties. The value of interests held in limited partnerships, other than securities, is determined by the general partner, based upon third-party appraisals of the underlying assets, which include inputs suchclassified as cost, operating results, discounted cash flows and market based comparable data. Private equity and real estate limited partnerships typically call capital over a three to five year period and pay out distributions as the underlying investments are liquidated. The typical expected life of these limited partnerships is 10-15 years and these investments typically cannot be redeemed prior to liquidation.level 3 investments.
Not Classified
Commingled funds, thatprivate equity limited partnerships and real estate partnerships hold underlying investments that have prices which are derived from the quoted prices in active markets and are not classified within the fair value hierarchy. Instead, these assets are measured at estimated fair value using the net asset value per share of the investments. TheCommingled funds' underlying assets are principally marketable equity and fixed income securities. Units held in commingled funds are valued at the unit value as reported by the investment managers. Private equity and real estate funds invest in natural resources, commercial real estate and distressed real estate. The fair value of these investments is determined by reference to the funds’ underlying assets.
For the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, there were no significant changes to valuation techniques to determine the fair value of our pension and other postretirement benefits' assets.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018:2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2019 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other
Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| Pension plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Cash | $ | 6.7 |
| | $ | 6.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Fixed income securities | | | | | | | |
| Government | 319.6 |
| | — |
| | 319.6 |
| | — |
|
| Corporate | 651.8 |
| | — |
| | 651.8 |
| | — |
|
| Mutual Funds | | | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 140.5 |
| | 140.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 56.9 |
| | 56.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Private equity limited partnerships(3) | | | | | | | |
U.S. multi-strategy(1) | 14.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
International multi-strategy(2) | 8.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Distressed opportunities | 0.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Real estate | 53.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Commingled funds(3) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | 14.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| U.S. equities | 305.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 148.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 351.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Pension plan assets subtotal | 2,073.0 |
| | 204.1 |
| | 971.4 |
| | — |
|
| Other postretirement benefit plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Mutual funds | | | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 81.7 |
| | 81.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 20.6 |
| | 20.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 119.2 |
| | 119.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Commingled funds(3) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | 7.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| U.S. equities | 12.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 20.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other postretirement benefit plan assets subtotal | 261.4 |
| | 221.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Due to brokers, net(4) | (2.8 | ) | | — |
| | (2.8 | ) | | — |
|
| Accrued income/dividends | 10.7 |
| | 10.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets | $ | 2,342.3 |
| | $ | 436.3 |
| | $ | 968.6 |
| | $ | — |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2018 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other
Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| Pension plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Cash | $ | 9.2 |
| | $ | 8.8 |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity securities | | | | | | | |
| U.S. equities | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income securities | | | | | | | |
| Government | 250.2 |
| | — |
| | 250.2 |
| | — |
|
| Corporate | 442.8 |
| | — |
| | 442.8 |
| | — |
|
| Mutual Funds | | | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 110.3 |
| | 110.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 43.2 |
| | 43.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 166.8 |
| | 166.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Private equity limited partnerships | | | | | | | |
U.S. multi-strategy(1) | 18.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18.5 |
|
International multi-strategy(2) | 12.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12.5 |
|
| Distressed opportunities | 2.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.4 |
|
| Real estate | 52.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 52.7 |
|
Commingled funds(3) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | 18.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| U.S. equities | 245.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 122.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 365.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Pension plan assets subtotal | 1,860.3 |
| | 329.3 |
| | 693.4 |
| | 86.1 |
|
| Other postretirement benefit plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Mutual funds | | | | | | | |
| U.S. equities | 68.4 |
| | 68.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 17.5 |
| | 17.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 114.8 |
| | 114.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Commingled funds(3) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | 5.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| U.S. equities | 10.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other postretirement benefit plan assets subtotal | 216.3 |
| | 200.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Due to brokers, net(4) | (1.1 | ) | | — |
| | (1.1 | ) | | — |
|
| Accrued income/dividends | 8.6 |
| | 8.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets | $ | 2,084.1 |
| | $ | 538.6 |
| | $ | 692.3 |
| | $ | 86.1 |
|
(1) This class includes limited partnerships/fund of funds that invest in a diverse portfolio of private equity strategies, including buy-outs, venture capital, growth capital, special situations and secondary markets, primarily inside the United States.
(2) This class includes limited partnerships/fund of funds that invest in diverse portfolio of private equity strategies, including buy-outs, venture capital, growth capital, special situations and secondary markets, primarily outside the United States.
(3) This class of investments is measured at fair value using the net asset value per share and has not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.
(4) This class represents pending trades with brokers.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Plan’s Level 3 assets for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at January 1, 2019 | | Transfers out (Level 3)(1) | | Balance at December 31, 2019 |
| Private equity limited partnerships | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 18.5 |
| | (18.5 | ) | | — |
|
| International multi-strategy | 12.5 |
| | (12.5 | ) | | — |
|
| Distressed opportunities | 2.4 |
| | (2.4 | ) | | — |
|
| Real estate | 52.7 |
| | (52.7 | ) | | — |
|
| Total | $ | 86.1 |
| | $ | (86.1 | ) | | $ | — |
|
(1) Level 3 assets from the prior year were reclassified in the current year presentation and included within the fair value hierarchy table as of December 31, 2019 as “Not Classified" investments for which fair value is measured using net asset value per share, consistent with the definitions described above.
The table below sets forth a summary of unfunded commitments, redemption frequency and redemption notice periods for certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Fair Value | | Redemption Frequency | | Redemption Notice Period |
| Commingled Funds | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | $ | 22.5 |
| | Daily | | 1 day |
| U.S. equities | 318.0 |
| | Monthly | | 1 day |
| International equities | 168.2 |
| | Monthly | | 10-30 days |
| Fixed income | 351.8 |
| | Daily | | 3 days |
| Total | $ | 860.5 |
| | | | |
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2018 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other
Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| Pension plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Cash | $ | 9.2 |
| | $ | 8.8 |
| | $ | 0.4 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity securities | | | | | | | |
| U.S. equities | 0.2 |
| | 0.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income securities | | | | | | | |
| Government | 250.2 |
| | — |
| | 250.2 |
| | — |
|
| Corporate | 442.8 |
| | — |
| | 442.8 |
| | — |
|
| Mutual Funds | | | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 110.3 |
| | 110.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 43.2 |
| | 43.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 166.8 |
| | 166.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Private equity limited partnerships | | | | | | | |
U.S. multi-strategy(1) | 18.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 18.5 |
|
International multi-strategy(2) | 12.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 12.5 |
|
| Distressed opportunities | 2.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 2.4 |
|
| Real Estate | 52.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 52.7 |
|
Commingled funds(3) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | 18.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| U.S. equities | 245.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 122.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 365.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Pension plan assets subtotal | 1,860.3 |
| | 329.3 |
| | 693.4 |
| | 86.1 |
|
| Other postretirement benefit plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Mutual funds | | | | | | | |
| U.S. equities | 68.4 |
| | 68.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 17.5 |
| | 17.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 114.8 |
| | 114.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Commingled funds(3) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | 5.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| U.S. equities | 10.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other postretirement benefit plan assets subtotal | 216.3 |
| | 200.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Due to brokers, net(4) | (1.1 | ) | | — |
| | (1.1 | ) | | — |
|
| Accrued investment income/dividends | 8.6 |
| | 8.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets | $ | 2,084.1 |
| | $ | 538.6 |
| | $ | 692.3 |
| | $ | 86.1 |
|
(1) This class includes limited partnerships/fund of funds that invest in a diverse portfolio of private equity strategies, including buy-outs, venture capital, growth capital, special situations and secondary markets, primarily inside the United States.
(2) This class includes limited partnerships/fund of funds that invest in a diverse portfolio of private equity strategies, including buy-outs, venture capital, growth capital, special situations and secondary markets, primarily outside the United States.
(3) This class of investments is measured at fair value using the net asset value per share and has not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.
(4) This class represents pending trades with brokers.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Plan’s Level 3 assets for the year ended December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at January 1, 2018 | | Total gains or losses (unrealized / realized) | | Purchases | | (Sales) | | Balance at December 31, 2018 |
| Private equity limited partnerships | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 26.7 |
| | 2.4 |
| | 0.7 |
| | (11.3 | ) | | 18.5 |
|
| International multi-strategy | 19.1 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | — |
| | (6.0 | ) | | 12.5 |
|
| Distress opportunities | 3.2 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 2.4 |
|
| Real estate | 49.9 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 1.8 |
| | (0.7 | ) | | 52.7 |
|
| Total | $ | 98.9 |
| | $ | 2.7 |
| | $ | 2.5 |
| | $ | (18.0 | ) | | $ | 86.1 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at January 1, 2018 | | Total gains or losses (unrealized / realized) | | Purchases | | (Sales) | | Balance at December 31, 2018 |
| Private equity limited partnerships | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 26.7 |
| | 2.4 |
| | 0.7 |
| | (11.3 | ) | | 18.5 |
|
| International multi-strategy | 19.1 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | — |
| | (6.0 | ) | | 12.5 |
|
| Distressed opportunities | 3.2 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | 2.4 |
|
| Real estate | 49.9 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 1.8 |
| | (0.7 | ) | | 52.7 |
|
| Total | $ | 98.9 |
| | $ | 2.7 |
| | $ | 2.5 |
| | $ | (18.0 | ) | | $ | 86.1 |
|
The table below sets forth a summary of unfunded commitments, redemption frequency and redemption notice periods for certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share for the year ended December 31, 2018:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Fair Value | | Redemption Frequency | | Redemption Notice Period |
| Commingled Funds | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | $ | 23.5 |
| | Daily | | 1 day |
| U.S. equities | 255.6 |
| | Monthly | | 3 days |
| International equities | 122.3 |
| | Monthly | | 10-30 days |
| Fixed income | 365.7 |
| | Monthly | | 3 days |
| Total | $ | 767.1 |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Fair Value | | Redemption Frequency | | Redemption Notice Period |
| Commingled Funds | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | $ | 23.5 |
| | Daily | | 1 day |
| U.S. equities | 255.6 |
| | Monthly | | 3 days |
| International equities | 122.3 |
| | Monthly | | 10-30 days |
| Fixed income | 365.7 |
| | Monthly | | 3 days |
| Total | $ | 767.1 |
| | | | |
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | December 31,
2017 | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other
Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant
Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
| Pension plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Cash | $ | 9.7 |
| | $ | 9.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Equity securities | | | | | | | |
| U.S. equities | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income securities | | | | | | | |
| Government | 143.4 |
| | — |
| | 143.4 |
| | — |
|
| Corporate | 332.6 |
| | — |
| | 332.6 |
| | — |
|
| Mutual Funds | | | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 231.5 |
| | 231.5 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 85.8 |
| | 85.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 242.3 |
| | 242.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Private equity limited partnerships | | | | | | | |
U.S. multi-strategy(1) | 26.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 26.7 |
|
International multi-strategy(2) | 19.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 19.1 |
|
| Distressed opportunities | 3.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.2 |
|
| Real Estate | 49.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 49.9 |
|
Commingled funds(3) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | 34.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| U.S. equities | 466.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 265.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 244.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Pension plan assets subtotal | 2,155.2 |
| | 569.6 |
| | 476.0 |
| | 98.9 |
|
| Other postretirement benefit plan assets: | | | | | | | |
| Mutual funds | | | | | | | |
| U.S. equities | 83.8 |
| | 83.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| International equities | 39.8 |
| | 39.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Fixed income | 117.3 |
| | 117.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Commingled funds(3) | | | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | 9.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| U.S. equities | 12.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other postretirement benefit plan assets subtotal | 262.5 |
| | 240.9 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Due to brokers, net(4) | (2.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Accrued investment income/dividends | 7.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total pension and other postretirement benefit plan assets | $ | 2,422.5 |
| | $ | 810.5 |
| | $ | 476.0 |
| | $ | 98.9 |
|
(1) This class includes limited partnerships/fund of funds that invest in a diverse portfolio of private equity strategies, including buy-outs, venture capital, growth capital, special situations and secondary markets, primarily inside the United States.
(2) This class includes limited partnerships/fund of funds that invest in a diverse portfolio of private equity strategies, including buy-outs, venture capital, growth capital, special situations and secondary markets, primarily outside the United States.
(3) This class of investments is measured at fair value using the net asset value per share and has not been classified in the fair value hierarchy.
(4) This class represents pending trades with brokers.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The table below sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of the Plan’s Level 3 assets for the year ended December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Balance at January 1, 2017 | | Total gains or losses (unrealized / realized) | | Purchases | | (Sales) | | Balance at December 31, 2017 |
| Fixed income securities | | | | | | | | | |
| Other fixed income | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | — |
|
| Private equity limited partnerships | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. multi-strategy | 34.8 |
| | 2.1 |
| | 0.9 |
| | (11.1 | ) | | 26.7 |
|
| International multi-strategy | 24.9 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 0.1 |
| | (7.0 | ) | | 19.1 |
|
| Distress opportunities | 4.1 |
| | 0.4 |
| | — |
| | (1.3 | ) | | 3.2 |
|
| Real estate | 9.2 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | 42.1 |
| | (0.8 | ) | | 49.9 |
|
| Total | $ | 73.1 |
| | $ | 2.9 |
| | $ | 43.1 |
| | $ | (20.2 | ) | | $ | 98.9 |
|
The table below sets forth a summary of unfunded commitments, redemption frequency and redemption notice periods for certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share for the year ended December 31, 2017:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Fair Value | | Redemption Frequency | | Redemption Notice Period |
| Commingled Funds | | | | | |
| Short-term money markets | $ | 43.5 |
| | Daily | | 1 day |
| U.S. equities | 478.8 |
| | Monthly | | 3 days |
| International equities | 265.1 |
| | Monthly | | 14-30 days |
| Fixed income | 244.9 |
| | Monthly | | 3 days |
| Total | $ | 1,032.3 |
| | | | |
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Our Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans’ Funded Status and Related Disclosure. The following table provides a reconciliation of the plans’ funded status and amounts reflected in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 based on a December 31 measurement date:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
Change in projected benefit obligation(1) | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 1,981.3 |
| | $ | 2,192.6 |
| | $ | 492.5 |
| | $ | 556.3 |
|
| Service cost | 29.2 |
| | 31.3 |
| | 5.1 |
| | 5.0 |
|
| Interest cost | 72.3 |
| | 67.1 |
| | 19.2 |
| | 17.6 |
|
| Plan participants’ contributions | — |
| | — |
| | 4.8 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| Plan amendments | — |
| | 0.2 |
| | 5.1 |
| | 0.1 |
|
| Actuarial (gain) loss | 204.3 |
| | (103.9 | ) | | 88.8 |
| | (51.7 | ) |
| Settlement loss | — |
| | 0.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Benefits paid | (156.6 | ) | | (206.8 | ) | | (39.5 | ) | | (41.1 | ) |
| Estimated benefits paid by incurred subsidy | — |
| | — |
| | 0.5 |
| | 0.6 |
|
| Projected benefit obligation at end of year | $ | 2,130.5 |
| | $ | 1,981.3 |
| | $ | 576.5 |
| | $ | 492.5 |
|
| Change in plan assets | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | 1,867.7 |
| | $ | 2,160.0 |
| | $ | 216.3 |
| | $ | 262.5 |
|
| Actual (loss) return on plan assets | 366.8 |
| | (88.4 | ) | | 56.9 |
| | (31.8 | ) |
| Employer contributions | 2.9 |
| | 2.9 |
| | 23.0 |
| | 21.0 |
|
| Plan participants’ contributions | — |
| | — |
| | 4.7 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| Benefits paid | (156.5 | ) | | (206.8 | ) | | (39.5 | ) | | (41.1 | ) |
| Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | 2,080.9 |
| | $ | 1,867.7 |
| | $ | 261.4 |
| | $ | 216.3 |
|
| Funded Status at end of year | $ | (49.6 | ) | | $ | (113.6 | ) | | $ | (315.1 | ) |
| $ | (276.2 | ) |
| Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of: | | | | | | | |
| Noncurrent assets | 8.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Current liabilities | (3.0 | ) | | (3.0 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (0.8 | ) |
| Noncurrent liabilities | (54.8 | ) | | (110.6 | ) | | (314.3 | ) | | (275.4 | ) |
Net amount recognized at end of year(2) | $ | (49.6 | ) | | $ | (113.6 | ) | | $ | (315.1 | ) | | $ | (276.2 | ) |
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income or regulatory asset/liability(3) | | | | | | | |
| Unrecognized prior service credit | $ | 3.0 |
| | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | (10.7 | ) | | $ | (19.0 | ) |
| Unrecognized actuarial loss | 652.8 |
| | 761.2 |
| | 118.4 |
| | 75.3 |
|
| Net amount recognized at end of year | $ | 655.8 |
| | $ | 764.4 |
| | $ | 107.7 |
| | $ | 56.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Change in projected benefit obligation(1) | | | | | | | |
| Benefit obligation at beginning of year | $ | 2,192.6 |
| | $ | 2,165.8 |
| | $ | 556.3 |
| | $ | 529.0 |
|
| Service cost | 31.3 |
| | 30.0 |
| | 5.0 |
| | 4.8 |
|
| Interest cost | 67.1 |
| | 68.3 |
| | 17.6 |
| | 17.8 |
|
| Plan participants’ contributions | — |
| | — |
| | 5.7 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| Plan amendments | 0.2 |
| | 0.9 |
| | 0.1 |
| | 1.6 |
|
| Actuarial (gain) loss | (103.9 | ) | | 98.3 |
| | (51.7 | ) | | 36.2 |
|
| Settlement loss | 0.8 |
| | 1.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Benefits paid | (206.8 | ) | | (172.3 | ) | | (41.1 | ) | | (39.3 | ) |
| Estimated benefits paid by incurred subsidy | — |
| | — |
| | 0.6 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| Projected benefit obligation at end of year | $ | 1,981.3 |
| | $ | 2,192.6 |
| | $ | 492.5 |
| | $ | 556.3 |
|
| Change in plan assets | | | | | | | |
| Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year | $ | 2,160.0 |
| | $ | 1,750.9 |
| | $ | 262.5 |
| | $ | 231.4 |
|
| Actual (loss) return on plan assets | (88.4 | ) | | 299.1 |
| | (31.8 | ) | | 33.1 |
|
| Employer contributions | 2.9 |
| | 282.3 |
| | 21.0 |
| | 31.6 |
|
| Plan participants’ contributions | — |
| | — |
| | 5.7 |
| | 5.7 |
|
| Benefits paid | (206.8 | ) | | (172.3 | ) | | (41.1 | ) | | (39.3 | ) |
| Fair value of plan assets at end of year | $ | 1,867.7 |
| | $ | 2,160.0 |
| | $ | 216.3 |
| | $ | 262.5 |
|
| Funded Status at end of year | $ | (113.6 | ) | | $ | (32.6 | ) | | $ | (276.2 | ) |
| $ | (293.8 | ) |
| Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position consist of: | | | | | | | |
| Noncurrent assets | — |
| | 9.8 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Current liabilities | (3.0 | ) | | (2.8 | ) | | (0.8 | ) | | (0.7 | ) |
| Noncurrent liabilities | (110.6 | ) | | (39.6 | ) | | (275.4 | ) | | (293.1 | ) |
Net amount recognized at end of year(2) | $ | (113.6 | ) | | $ | (32.6 | ) | | $ | (276.2 | ) | | $ | (293.8 | ) |
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income or regulatory asset/liability(3) | | | | | | | |
| Unrecognized prior service credit | $ | 3.2 |
| | $ | 2.5 |
| | $ | (19.0 | ) | | $ | (23.1 | ) |
| Unrecognized actuarial loss | 761.2 |
| | 692.9 |
| | 75.3 |
| | 84.2 |
|
| Net amount recognized at end of year | $ | 764.4 |
| | $ | 695.4 |
| | $ | 56.3 |
| | $ | 61.1 |
|
(1) The change in benefit obligation for Pension Benefits represents the change in Projected Benefit Obligation while the change in benefit obligation for Other Postretirement Benefits represents the change in accumulated postretirement benefit obligation.
(2) We recognize our Consolidated Balance Sheets underfunded and overfunded status of our various defined benefit postretirement plans, measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan assets and the benefit obligation.
(3) We determined that for certain rate-regulated subsidiaries the future recovery of pension and other postretirement benefits costs is probable. These rate-regulated subsidiaries recorded regulatory assets and liabilities of $739.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019, and $798.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018 and $733.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2017 that would otherwise have been recorded to accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Our accumulated benefit obligation for our pension plans was $1,965.6$2,111.5 million and $2,170.4$1,965.6 million as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation as of a date is the actuarial present value of benefits attributed by the pension benefit formula to employee service rendered prior to that date and based on current and past compensation levels. The accumulated benefit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation disclosed in the table above in that it includes no assumptions about future compensation levels.
Our pension plans were underfunded by $113.6 million at December 31, 2018 comparedWe are required to being underfunded, in aggregate, by $32.6 million at December 31, 2017. The decline inreflect the funded status was due primarily to unfavorable asset returns offsetof the pension and postretirement benefit plans on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The funded status of the plans is measured as the difference between the plan assets' fair value and the projected benefit obligation. We present the noncurrent aggregate of all underfunded plans within "Accrued liability for postretirement and postemployment benefits." The portion of the amount by an increasewhich the actuarial present value of benefits included in discount rates. We contributed $2.9 million and $282.3 million to our pension plans in 2018 and 2017, respectively.the projected benefit obligation
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
exceeds the fair value of plan assets, payable in the next 12 months, is reflected in "Accrued compensation and other benefits." We present the aggregate of all overfunded plans within "Deferred charges and other."
Information for pension plans with a projected benefit obligation in excess of plan assets:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Accumulated Benefit Obligation | $ | 1,473.9 |
| | $ | 1,965.6 |
|
| Funded Status | | | |
| Projected Benefit Obligation | 1,492.9 |
| | 1,981.3 |
|
| Fair Value of Plan Assets | 1,435.1 |
| | 1,867.7 |
|
| Funded Status of Underfunded Pension Plans at End of Year | $ | (57.8 | ) | | $ | (113.6 | ) |
Information for pension plans with plan assets in excess of the projected benefit obligation:
|
| | | | | | | |
| | December 31, |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Accumulated Benefit Obligation | $ | 637.6 |
| | $ | — |
|
| Funded Status | | | |
| Projected Benefit Obligation | 637.6 |
| | — |
|
| Fair Value of Plan Assets | 645.8 |
| | — |
|
| Funded Status of Overfunded Pension Plans at End of Year | $ | 8.2 |
| | $ | — |
|
Our pension plans were underfunded, in aggregate, by $49.6 million at December 31, 2019 compared to being underfunded by $113.6 million at December 31, 2018. The improvement in the funded status was due primarily to favorable asset returns offset by a decrease in discount rates. We contributed $2.9 million to our pension plans in both 2019 and 2018.
Our other postretirement benefit plans were underfunded by $315.1 million at December 31, 2019 compared to being underfunded by $276.2 million at December 31, 2018 compared to being underfunded by $293.8 million at December 31, 2017.2018. The improvementdecline in funded status was primarily due to employer contributions and an increasea decrease in discount rates offset by unfavorablefavorable asset returns. We contributed $21.0$23.0 million and $31.6$21.0 million to our other postretirement benefit plans in 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively.
No amounts of our pension or other postretirement benefit plans’ assets are expected to be returned to us or any of our subsidiaries in 2018.2019.
In 20182019 and 2017,2018, some of our qualified pension plans paid lump sum payouts in excess of the respective plan's service cost plus interest cost, thereby meeting the requirement for settlement accounting. We recorded settlement charges of $9.5 million and $18.5 million in 2019 and $13.7 million in 2018, and 2017, respectively. Net periodic pension benefit cost for 20182019 was increaseddecreased by $3.0$0.7 million as a result of the interim remeasurement.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The following table provides the key assumptions that were used to calculate the pension and other postretirement benefits obligations for our various plans as of December 31:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Weighted-average assumptions to Determine Benefit Obligation | | | | | | | |
| Discount Rate | 3.12 | % | | 4.26 | % | | 3.21 | % | | 4.31 | % |
| Rate of Compensation Increases | 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % | | — |
| | — |
|
| Health Care Trend Rates | | | | | | | |
| Trend for Next Year | — |
| | — |
| | 6.68 | % | | 8.48 | % |
| Ultimate Trend | — |
| | — |
| | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % |
| Year Ultimate Trend Reached | — |
| | — |
| | 2028 |
| | 2026 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Weighted-average assumptions to Determine Benefit Obligation | | | | | | | |
| Discount Rate | 4.26 | % | | 3.58 | % | | 4.31 | % | | 3.67 | % |
| Rate of Compensation Increases | 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % | | — |
| | — |
|
| Health Care Trend Rates | | | | | | | |
| Trend for Next Year | — |
| | — |
| | 8.48 | % | | 8.52 | % |
| Ultimate Trend | — |
| | — |
| | 4.50 | % | | 4.50 | % |
| Year Ultimate Trend Reached | — |
| | — |
| | 2026 |
| | 2025 |
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | 1% point increase | | 1% point decrease |
| Effect on service and interest components of net periodic cost | $ | 1.2 |
| | $ | (1.1 | ) |
| Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation | 30.1 |
| | (26.3 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | 1% point increase | | 1% point decrease |
| Effect on service and interest components of net periodic cost | $ | 1.3 |
| | $ | (1.1 | ) |
| Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation | 25.0 |
| | (22.0 | ) |
We expect to make contributions of approximately $3.0 million to our pension plans and approximately $20.6$24.0 million to our postretirement medical and life plans in 2018.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
2020.
The following table provides benefits expected to be paid in each of the next five fiscal years, and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years thereafter. The expected benefits are estimated based on the same assumptions used to measure our benefit obligation at the end of the year and include benefits attributable to the estimated future service of employees:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Pension Benefits | | Other
Postretirement Benefits | | Federal
Subsidy Receipts |
| Year(s) | | | | | |
| 2020 | $ | 178.8 |
| | $ | 38.1 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
|
| 2021 | 177.8 |
| | 38.6 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 2022 | 175.8 |
| | 38.4 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 2023 | 168.5 |
| | 38.1 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 2024 | 164.4 |
| | 37.9 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 2025-2029 | 723.7 |
| | 181.0 |
| | 1.5 |
|
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions) | Pension Benefits | | Other
Postretirement Benefits | | Federal
Subsidy Receipts |
| Year(s) | | | | | |
| 2019 | $ | 177.4 |
| | $ | 34.3 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
|
| 2020 | 176.0 |
| | 35.0 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| 2021 | 176.5 |
| | 35.7 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| 2022 | 174.4 |
| | 36.0 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 2023 | 166.5 |
| | 35.8 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| 2024-2028 | 748.7 |
| | 171.8 |
| | 1.7 |
|
The following table provides the components of the plans’ actuarially determined net periodic benefits cost for each of the three years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016:
2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost(1) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 29.2 |
| | $ | 31.3 |
| | $ | 30.0 |
| | $ | 5.1 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 4.8 |
|
| Interest cost | 72.3 |
| | 67.1 |
| | 68.3 |
| | 19.2 |
| | 17.6 |
| | 17.8 |
|
| Expected return on assets | (108.8 | ) | | (142.3 | ) | | (123.1 | ) | | (13.1 | ) | | (14.9 | ) | | (15.9 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service cost (credit) | 0.2 |
| | (0.4 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | | (3.2 | ) | | (4.0 | ) | | (4.4 | ) |
| Recognized actuarial loss | 45.2 |
| | 40.6 |
| | 52.9 |
| | 2.0 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 3.0 |
|
| Settlement loss | 9.5 |
| | 18.5 |
| | 13.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total Net Periodic Benefits Cost | $ | 47.6 |
| | $ | 14.8 |
| | $ | 41.1 |
| | $ | 10.0 |
| | $ | 7.5 |
| | $ | 5.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost(1) | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Service cost | $ | 31.3 |
| | $ | 30.0 |
| | $ | 30.7 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
| | $ | 4.8 |
| | $ | 5.0 |
|
| Interest cost | 67.1 |
| | 68.3 |
| | 89.7 |
| | 17.6 |
| | 17.8 |
| | 22.0 |
|
| Expected return on assets | (142.3 | ) | | (123.1 | ) | | (132.9 | ) | | (14.9 | ) | | (15.9 | ) | | (17.2 | ) |
| Amortization of prior service cost (credit) | (0.4 | ) | | (0.7 | ) | | (0.2 | ) | | (4.0 | ) | | (4.4 | ) | | (4.9 | ) |
| Recognized actuarial loss | 40.6 |
| | 52.9 |
| | 61.2 |
| | 3.8 |
| | 3.0 |
| | 3.1 |
|
| Settlement loss | 18.5 |
| | 13.7 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total Net Periodic Benefits Cost | $ | 14.8 |
| | $ | 41.1 |
| | $ | 48.5 |
| | $ | 7.5 |
| | $ | 5.3 |
| | $ | 8.0 |
|
(1)Service cost is presented in "Operation and maintenance" on the Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss). Non-service cost components are presented within "Other, net."
The following table provides the key assumptions that were used to calculate the net periodic benefits cost for our various plans:
| | | | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Weighted-average Assumptions to Determine Net Periodic Benefit Cost | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Discount rate - service cost(1) | 3.79 | % | | 4.40 | % | | 4.24 | % | | 3.89 | % | | 4.58 | % | | 4.33 | % | 4.48 | % | | 3.79 | % | | 4.40 | % | | 4.59 | % | | 3.89 | % | | 4.58 | % |
Discount rate - interest cost(1) | 3.15 | % | | 3.31 | % | | 4.24 | % | | 3.27 | % | | 3.48 | % | | 4.33 | % | 3.84 | % | | 3.15 | % | | 3.31 | % | | 3.94 | % | | 3.27 | % | | 3.48 | % |
| Expected Long-Term Rate of Return on Plan Assets | 7.00 | % | | 7.25 | % | | 8.00 | % | | 5.80 | % | | 6.99 | % | | 7.85 | % | 6.10 | % | | 7.00 | % | | 7.25 | % | | 5.83 | % | | 5.80 | % | | 6.99 | % |
| Rate of Compensation Increases | 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % | | 4.00 | % | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
We believe it is appropriate to assume a 7.00%6.10% and 5.80%5.83% rate of return on pension and other postretirement plan assets, respectively, for our calculation of 20182019 pension benefits cost. These rates are primarily based on asset mix and historical rates of return and were adjusted in the current year due to anticipated changes in asset allocation and projected market returns.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The following table provides other changes in plan assets and projected benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income or regulatory asset or liability:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Other Changes in Plan Assets and Projected Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income or Regulatory Asset or Liability | | | | | | | |
| Net prior service cost | $ | — |
| | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 5.1 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
|
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | (53.8 | ) | | 127.5 |
| | 45.1 |
| | (5.0 | ) |
| Settlements | (9.5 | ) | | (18.5 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Less: amortization of prior service cost | (0.2 | ) | | 0.4 |
| | 3.2 |
| | 4.0 |
|
| Less: amortization of net actuarial loss | (45.2 | ) | | (40.6 | ) | | (2.0 | ) | | (3.8 | ) |
| Total Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income or Regulatory Asset or Liability | $ | (108.7 | ) | | $ | 69.0 |
| | $ | 51.4 |
| | $ | (4.7 | ) |
| Amount Recognized in Net Periodic Benefits Cost and Other Comprehensive Income or Regulatory Asset or Liability | $ | (61.1 | ) | | $ | 83.8 |
| | $ | 61.4 |
| | $ | 2.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits |
| (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Other Changes in Plan Assets and Projected Benefit Obligations Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income or Regulatory Asset or Liability | | | | | | | |
| Net prior service cost | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | 0.9 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | 1.6 |
|
| Net actuarial loss (gain) | 127.5 |
| | (76.1 | ) | | (5.0 | ) | | 18.9 |
|
| Settlements | (18.5 | ) | | (13.7 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Less: amortization of prior service cost | 0.4 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 4.0 |
| | 4.4 |
|
| Less: amortization of net actuarial loss | (40.6 | ) | | (52.9 | ) | | (3.8 | ) | | (3.0 | ) |
| Total Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income or Regulatory Asset or Liability | $ | 69.0 |
| | $ | (141.1 | ) | | $ | (4.7 | ) | | $ | 21.9 |
|
| Amount Recognized in Net Periodic Benefits Cost and Other Comprehensive Income or Regulatory Asset or Liability | $ | 83.8 |
| | $ | (100.0 | ) | | $ | 2.8 |
| | $ | 27.2 |
|
Based on a December 31 measurement date, the estimated net unrecognized actuarial loss, unrecognized prior service cost, (credit), and unrecognized transition obligation that will be amortized into net periodic benefit cost during 20192020 for the pension plans are $45.534.7 million, $0.20.8 million and zero0, respectively, and for other postretirement benefit plans are $2.44.9 million, $(3.2)(1.8) million and zero0, respectively.
12. Equity
We raise equity financing through a variety of programs including traditional common equity issuances ATM issuances and preferred stock issuances. As of December 31, 2018,2019, we had 400,000,000600,000,000 shares of common stock and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized for issuance, of which 372,363,656382,135,680 shares of common stock and 420,000440,000 shares of preferred stock are currently outstanding.
Holders of shares of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board out of funds legally available. The policy of the Board has been to declare cash dividends on a quarterly basis payable on or about the 20th day of February, May, August and November. We have paid quarterly common dividends totaling $0.80, $0.78, $0.70 and $0.64$0.70 per share for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, respectively. Our Board declared a quarterly common dividend of $0.20$0.21 per share, payable on February 20, 20192020 to holders of record on February 11, 2019.2020. We have certain debt covenants which could potentially limit the amount of dividends the Company could pay in order to maintain compliance with these covenants. Refer to Note 14, "Long-Term Debt," for more information. As of December 31, 2018,2019, these covenants did not restrict the amount of dividends that were available to be paid.
Dividends paid to preferred shareholders vary based on the series of preferred stock owned. Additional information is provided below. Holders of our shares of common stock are subject to the prior dividend rights of holders of our preferred stock or the depositary shares representing such preferred stock outstanding, and if full dividends have not been declared and paid on all outstanding shares of preferred stock in any dividend period, no dividend may be declared or paid or set aside for payment on our common stock.
Common and preferred stock activity for 2019, 2018 and 2017 is described further below:
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
ATM Program and Forward Sale Agreements. On May 3, 2017, we entered into four4 separate equity distribution agreements, pursuant to which we were able to sell up to an aggregate of $500.0 million of our common stock.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
On November 13, 2017, under the ATM program, we executed a forward agreement, which allowed us to issue a fixed number of shares at a price to be settled in the future. On November 6, 2018, the forward agreement was settled for $26.43 per share, resulting in $167.7 million of net proceeds. The equity distribution agreements entered into on May 3, 2017 expired December 31, 2018.
On November 1, 2018, we entered into five5 separate equity distribution agreements pursuant to which we were able to sell up to an aggregate of $500.0 million of our common stock. NaN of these agreements were then amended on August 1, 2019 and one was terminated, pursuant to which we may sell, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $500.0$434.4 million of our common stock.
On December 6, 2018, under the ATM program, described immediately above, we executed a forward agreement, which allowsallowed us to issue a fixed number of shares at a price to be settled in the future. From December 6, 2018 to December 10, 2018, 4,708,098 shares were borrowed from third parties and sold by the dealer at a weighted average price of $26.55 per share. We may settle this agreement in shares, cash, or net shares by December 6, 2019. Had we settled all the shares underOn November 21, 2019, the forward agreement was settled for $26.01 per share, resulting in $122.5 million of net proceeds.
On August 12, 2019, under the ATM program, we executed a separate forward agreement, which allowed us to issue a fixed number of shares at December 31, 2018, we would have received approximately $124.8 million, based on a netprice to be settled in the future. From August 12, 2019 to September 13, 2019, 3,714,400 shares were borrowed from third parties and sold by the dealer at a weighted average price of $26.51$29.26 per share. On December 11, 2019, the forward agreement was settled for $28.83 per share, resulting in $107.1 million of net proceeds.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, the ATM program (including the impacts of the aforementioned forward sales agreement) had approximately $309.4$200.7 million of equity available for issuance. The program expires on December 31, 2020.
The following table summarizes our activity under the ATM program:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ending December 31, | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Number of shares issued | 8,422,498 |
| | 8,883,014 |
| | 11,931,376 |
|
| Average price per share | $ | 27.75 |
| | $ | 26.85 |
| | $ | 26.58 |
|
Proceeds, net of fees (in millions) | $ | 229.1 |
| | $ | 232.5 |
| | $ | 314.7 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ending December 31, | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Number of shares issued | 8,883,014 |
| | 11,931,376 |
| | — |
|
| Average price per share | $ | 26.85 |
| | $ | 26.58 |
| | $ | — |
|
Proceeds, net of fees (in millions) | $ | 232.5 |
| | $ | 314.7 |
| | $ | — |
|
Private Placement of Common Stock. On May 4, 2018, we completed the sale of 24,964,163 shares of $0.01 par value common stock at a price of $24.28 per share in a private placement to selected institutional and accredited investors. The private placement resulted in $606.0 million of gross proceeds or $599.6 million of net proceeds, after deducting commissions and sale expenses. The common stock issued in connection with the private placement was registered on Form S-1, filed with the SEC on May 11, 2018.
Preferred Stock.On June 11, 2018, we completed the sale of 400,000 shares of 5.650% Series A Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (the "Series A Preferred Stock") at a price of $1,000 per share. The transaction resulted in $400.0 million of gross proceeds or $393.9 million of net proceeds, after deducting commissions and sale expenses. The Series A Preferred Stock was issued in a private placement pursuant to SEC Rule 144A. On December 13, 2018, we filed a registration statement with the SEC enabling holders to exchange their unregistered shares of Series A Preferred Stock for publicly registered shares with substantially identical terms.
Proceeds from the issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock were used to pay a portion of the notes tendered in June 2018 and the redemption of the remaining notes in July 2018. See Note 14, “Long-term Debt” for additional information regarding the tender offer and redemption.
Dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock accrue and are cumulative from the date the shares of Series A Preferred Stock were originally issued to, but not including, June 15, 2023 at a rate of 5.650% per annum of the $1,000 liquidation preference per share. On and after June 15, 2023, dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock will accumulate for each five year period at a percentage of the $1,000 liquidation preference equal to the five-year U.S. Treasury Rate plus (i) in respect of each five year period commencing on or after June 15, 2023 but before June 15, 2043, a spread of 2.843% (the “Initial Margin”), and (ii) in respect of each five year period commencing on or after June 15, 2043, the Initial Margin plus 1.000%. The Series A Preferred Stock may be redeemed by us at our option on June 15, 2023, or on each date falling on the fifth anniversary thereafter, or in connection with a ratings event (as defined in the Certificate of Designation of the Series A Preferred Stock).
As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, Series A Preferred Stock had $1.0 million of cumulative preferred dividends in arrears, or $2.51 per share.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Holders of Series A Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights, except for limited voting rights with respect to (i) potential amendments to our certificate of incorporation that would have a material adverse effect on the existing preferences, rights, powers or duties of the Series A Preferred Stock, (ii) the creation or issuance of any security ranking on a parity with the Series A Preferred
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Stock if the cumulative dividends payable on then outstanding Series A Preferred Stock are in arrears, or (iii) the creation or issuance of any security ranking senior to the Series A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock does not have a stated maturity and is not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking fund. The Series A Preferred Stock will remain outstanding indefinitely unless repurchased or redeemed by us. Any such redemption would be effected only out of funds legally available for such purposes and will be subject to compliance with the provisions of our outstanding indebtedness.
On December 5, 2018, we completed the sale of 20,000,000 depositary shares with an aggregate liquidation preference of $500,000,000 under the Company’s registration statement on Form S-3. Each depositary share represents 1/1,000th ownership interest in a share of our 6.500% Series B Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, liquidation preference $25,000 per share (equivalent to $25 per depositary share) (the “Series B Preferred Stock)Stock"). The transaction resulted in $500.0 million of gross proceeds or $486.1 million of net proceeds, after deducting commissions and sale expenses.
Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock accrue and are cumulative from the date the shares of Series B Preferred Stock were originally issued to, but not including, March 15, 2024 at a rate of 6.500% per annum of the $25,000 liquidation preference per share. On and after March 15, 2024, dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock will accumulate for each five year period at a percentage of the $25,000 liquidation preference equal to the five-year U.S. Treasury Rate plus (i) in respect of each five year period commencing on or after March 15, 2024 but before March 15, 2044, a spread of 3.632% (the “Initial Margin”), and (ii) in respect of each five year period commencing on or after March 15, 2044, the Initial Margin plus 1.000%. The Series B Preferred Stock may be redeemed by us at our option on March 15, 2024, or on each date falling on the fifth anniversary thereafter, or in connection with a ratings event (as defined in the Certificate of Designation of the Series B Preferred Stock).
OnAs of December 27,31, 2019 and 2018, Series B Preferred Stock had $1.4 million and $2.4 million, respectively, of cumulative preferred dividends in arrears, or $72.23 and $121.88 per share, respectively.
In addition, we issued 20,000 shares of “Series B-1 Preferred Stock”, par value $0.01 per share, liquidation preference $0.01 per share, (“Series B-1 Preferred Stock”), as a distribution with respect to the Series B Preferred Stock. As a result, each of the depositary shares issued on December 5, 2018 now represents a 1/1,000th ownership interest in a share of Series B Preferred Stock and a 1/1,000th ownership interest in a share of Series B-1 Preferred Stock. The CompanyWe issued the Series B-1 Preferred Stock to enhance the voting rights of the Series B Preferred Stock to comply with the minimum voting rights policy of the New York Stock Exchange. The Series B-1 Preferred Stock is paired with the Series B Preferred Stock and may not be transferred, redeemed or repurchased except in connection with the simultaneous transfer, redemption or repurchase of a like number of shares of the underlying Series B Preferred Stock.
Holders of Series B Preferred Stock generally have no voting rights, except for limited voting rights with respect to (i) potential amendments to our certificate of incorporation that would have a material adverse effect on the existing preferences, rights, powers or duties of the Series B Preferred Stock, (ii) the creation or issuance of any security ranking on a parity with the Series B Preferred Stock if the cumulative dividends payable on then outstanding Series B Preferred Stock are in arrears, or (iii) the creation or issuance of any security ranking senior to the Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, if and whenever dividends on any shares of Series B Preferred Stock shall not have been declared and paid for at least six dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, the number of directors then constituting our Board of Directors shall automatically be increased by two until all accumulated and unpaid dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock shall have been paid in full, and the holders of Series B-1 Preferred Stock, voting as a class together with the holders of any outstanding securities ranking on a parity with the Series B-1 Preferred Stock and having like voting rights that are exercisable at the time and entitled to vote thereon, shall be entitled to elect the two additional directors. The Series B Preferred Stock does not have a stated maturity and is not subject to mandatory redemption or any sinking fund. The Series B Preferred Stock will remain outstanding indefinitely unless repurchased or redeemed by us. Any such redemption would be effected only out of funds legally available for such purposes and will be subject to compliance with the provisions of our outstanding indebtedness.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The following table summarizes preferred stock by outstanding series of shares:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | Year ended December 31, | December 31, | | December 31, |
| | | | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2019 | | 2018 |
| (in millions except shares and per share amounts) | Liquidation Preference Per Share | Shares | Dividends Declared Per Share | Outstanding |
| 5.650% Series A | $ | 1,000.00 |
| 400,000 |
| $ | 56.50 |
| $ | 28.88 |
| $ | — |
| $ | 393.9 |
| | $ | 393.9 |
|
| 6.500% Series B | $ | 25,000.00 |
| 20,000 |
| $ | 1,674.65 |
| $ | — |
| $ | — |
| $ | 486.1 |
| | $ | 486.1 |
|
| |
13. | 13. Share-Based Compensation |
Our stockholders most recently approved the NiSource Inc. 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (“Omnibus Plan”) at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on May 12, 2015. The Omnibus Plan provides for awards to employees and non-employee directors of incentive and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, cash-based awards and other stock-based awards and supersedes the long-term incentive plan approved by stockholders on April 13, 1994 (“1994 Plan”) and the Director Stock Incentive Plan (“Director Plan”). The Omnibus Plan provides that the number of shares of common stock of NiSource available for awards is 8,000,000 plus the number of shares subject to outstanding awards that expire or terminate for any reason that were granted under either the 1994 Plan or the Director Plan, plus the number of shares that were awarded as a result of the Separation-related adjustments (discussed below).adjustments. At December 31, 2018,2019, there were 3,793,5573,313,183 shares reserved for future awards under the Omnibus Plan.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
We recognized stock-based employee compensation expense of $16.3 million, $15.2 million and $15.3 million, during 2019, 2018 and $15.1 million, during 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, as well as related tax benefits of $4.0 million, $3.7 million and $5.9 million, and $5.8 million, respectively. Additionally, we adopted ASU 2016-09 in the third quarter of 2016. We recognized related excess tax benefits from the distribution of vested share-based employee compensation of $0.8 million, $1.0 million and $4.4 million in 2019, 2018 and $7.2 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
As of December 31, 2018,2019, the total remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested awards amounted to $16.6$19.5 million, which will be amortized over the weighted-average remaining requisite service period of 1.71.8 years.
Restricted Stock Units and Restricted Stock. In 2019, we granted 166,031 restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock to employees, subject to service conditions. The total grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock was $4.1 million, based on the average market price of our common stock at the date of each grant less the present value of any dividends not received during the vesting period, which will be expensed over the vesting period which is generally three years. As of December 31, 2019, 157,786 non-vested restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock granted in 2019 were outstanding as of December 31, 2019.
In 2018, we granted 158,689 restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock to employees, subject to service conditions. The total grant date fair value of the restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock was $3.5 million, based on the average market price of our common stock at the date of each grant less the present value of any dividends not received during the vesting period, which will be expensed over the vesting period which is generally three years. As of December 31, 2018, 154,7992019, 136,820 non-vested restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock granted in 2018 were outstanding as of December 31, 2018.2019.
Restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock granted to employees in 2017 and 2016 were immaterial.
If an employee terminates employment before the service conditions lapse under the 2016, 2017, 2018 or 20182019 awards due to (1) Retirementretirement or Disabilitydisability (as defined in the award agreement), or (2) death, the service conditions will lapse on the date of such termination with respect to a pro rata portion of the restricted stock units and shares of restricted stock based upon the percentage of the service period satisfied between the grant date and the date of the termination of employment. In the event of a change in control (as defined in the award agreement), all unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded will immediately vest upon termination of employment occurring in connection with a change in control. Termination due to any other reason will result in all unvested shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units awarded being forfeited effective on the employee’s date of termination.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
|
| | | | | |
| (shares) | Restricted Stock Units | | Weighted Average Award Date Fair Value Per Unit ($) |
| Non-vested at December 31, 2017 | 698,126 |
| | 15.09 |
|
| Granted | 158,689 |
| | 21.94 |
|
| Forfeited | (6,890 | ) | | 21.42 |
|
| Vested | (671,247 | ) | | 14.91 |
|
| Non-vested at December 31, 2018 | 178,678 |
| | 21.82 |
|
|
| | | | | |
| (shares) | Restricted Stock Units | | Weighted Average Award Date Fair Value Per Unit ($) |
| Non-vested at December 31, 2018 | 178,678 |
| | 21.82 |
|
| Granted | 166,031 |
| | 24.93 |
|
| Forfeited | (21,547 | ) | | 22.99 |
|
| Vested | (20,556 | ) | | 21.08 |
|
| Non-vested at December 31, 2019 | 302,606 |
| | 23.49 |
|
Performance Shares. In 2019, we granted 552,389 performance shares subject to service, performance and market conditions. The service conditions for these awards lapse on February 28, 2022. The performance period for the awards is the period beginning January 1, 2019 and ending December 31, 2021. The performance conditions are based on the achievement of one non-GAAP financial measure and additional operational measures as outlined below.
The financial measure is cumulative net operating earnings per share ("NOEPS"), which we define as income from continuing operations adjusted for certain unusual or non-recurring items. The number of cumulative NOEPS shares determined using this measure shall be increased or decreased based on our relative total shareholder return, a market condition which we define as the annualized growth in dividends and share price of a share of our common stock (calculated using a 20 trading day average of our closing price beginning on December 31, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2021) compared to the total shareholder return of a predetermined peer group of companies. A relative shareholder return result within the first quartile will result in an increase to the NOEPS shares of 25%, while a relative shareholder return result within the fourth quartile will result in a decrease of 25%. A Monte Carlo analysis was used to value the portion of these awards dependent on market conditions. The grant date fair value of the awards was $11.7 million, based on the average market price of our common stock at the date of each grant less the present value of dividends not received during the vesting period which will be expensed over the requisite service period of three years. As of December 31, 2019, 422,825 of these non-vested performance shares granted in 2019 remained outstanding.
If a threshold level of cumulative NOEPS financial performance is achieved, additional operational measures which we refer to as the customer value index, which consists of five equally weighted areas of focus including safety, customer satisfaction, financial, culture and environmental apply. Each area of focus represents 20% of the customer value index shares, and the targets for all areas must be met for these awards to be eligible for 100% payout of these awards. The grant date fair value of the awards was $2.5 million, based on the average market price of our common stock on the grant date of each award less the present value of dividends not received during the vesting period which will be expensed over the requisite service period of three years. As of December 31, 2019, 97,574 of these awards that were issued in 2019 remained outstanding.
In 2018, we awarded 514,338 performance shares subject to service, performance and market conditions. The service conditions for these awards lapse on February 26, 2021. The performance period for the awards is the period beginning January 1, 2018 and ending December 31, 2020. The performance conditions are based on the achievement of one non-GAAP financial measure and additional operational measures as outlined below.
The financial measure is cumulative net operating earnings per share ("NOEPS"), which we define as income from continuing operations adjusted for certain unusual or non-recurring items. The number of cumulative NOEPS shares determined using this measure shall be increased or decreased based on our relative total shareholder return, a market condition which we define as the annualized growth in dividends and share price of a share of our common stock (calculated using a 20 trading day average of our closing price beginning on December 31, 2017 and ending on December 31, 2020) compared to the total shareholder return of a predetermined peer group of companies. A relative shareholder return result within the first quartile will result in an increase to the NOEPS shares of 25% while a relative shareholder return result within the fourth quartile will result in a decrease of 25%. A Monte Carlo analysis was used to value the portion of these awards dependent on market conditions. The grant date fair value of the awards was $9.2 million, based on the average market price of NiSource’sour common stock at the date of each grant less the present value of dividends not received during the vesting period which will be expensed over the three year requisite service period.period of three years. As of December 31, 2018, 405,2552019, 368,811 of these non-vested performance shares granted in 2018 remained outstanding.
If a threshold level of cumulative NOEPS financial performance is achieved, additional operational measures which we refer to as the customer value index, which consists of five equally weighted areas of focus including safety, customer satisfaction, financial, culture and environmental apply. Each area of focus represents 20% of the customer value index shares and the targets for all areas must be met for these awards to be eligible for 100% payout of these awards. Individual payout percentages for these shares may
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
range from 0%-200% as determined by the compensation committee in its sole discretion. Due to this discretion, these shares are not considered to be granted under ASC 718. The service inception date fair value of the awards was $2.4 million, based on the closing market price of our common stock on the service inception date of each award. This value will be reassessed at each reporting period to be based on our closing market price of our common stock at the reporting period date with adjustments to expense recorded as appropriate. As of December 31, 2018, 93,5222019, 85,111 of these awards that were issued in 2018 remained outstanding. The service conditions for these awards lapse on February 28,26, 2021.
In 2017, we granted 660,750 performance shares subject to service, performance and market conditions. The grant date fair value of the awards was $12.9 million, based on the average market price of our common stock at the date of each grant less the present value of dividends not received during the vesting period which will be expensed over the three year requisite service period.period of three years. The performance conditions are based on achievement of non-GAAP financial measures similar to those discussed above: cumulative net operating earnings per share for the three-year period ending December 31, 2019 and relative total shareholder return (calculated using a 20 trading day average of our closing price beginning on December 31, 2016 and ending on December 31, 2019). As of December 31, 2018, 579,2922019, 528,928 non-vested performance shares granted in 2017 remained outstanding. The service conditions for these awards lapse on February 28, 2020.
In 2016, we granted 647,305 performance shares subject to service, performance and market conditions. The grant date fair value of the awards was $12.6 million, based on the average market price of our common stock at the date of each grant less the present value of dividends not received during the vesting period which will be expensed over the three year requisite service period. Similar to the above grants, performance conditions for these awards are based on achievement of certain non-GAAP financial measures: cumulative net operating earnings per share for the three-year period ending December 31, 2018 and relative total shareholder return (calculated using a 20 trading day average of our closing price beginning on December 31, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2018). As of December 31, 2018, 556,649 non-vested performance shares granted in 2016 remained outstanding. The service conditions for these awards lapse on February 28, 2019. |
| | | | | |
| (shares) | Performance Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit ($)(1) |
| Non-vested at December 31, 2018 | 1,634,718 |
| | 20.45 |
|
| Granted | 552,389 |
| | 25.77 |
|
| Forfeited | (156,700 | ) | | 26.72 |
|
| Vested | (527,156 | ) | | 28.11 |
|
| Non-vested at December 31, 2019 | 1,503,251 |
| | 22.74 |
|
|
| | | | | |
| (shares) | Performance Awards | | Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value Per Unit ($)(1) |
| Non-vested at December 31, 2017 | 1,184,773 |
| | 19.52 |
|
| Granted | 514,338 |
| | 22.51 |
|
| Forfeited | (64,393 | ) | | 26.79 |
|
| Vested | — |
| | — |
|
| Non-vested at December 31, 2018 | 1,634,718 |
| | 20.45 |
|
(1)2018 performance shares awarded based on the customer value index are included at reporting date fair value as these awards have not been granted under ASC 718 as discussed above.
Non-employee Director Awards. As of May 11, 2010, awards to non-employee directors may be made only under the Omnibus Plan. Currently, restricted stock units are granted annually to non-employee directors, subject to a non-employee director’s election to defer receipt of such restricted stock unit award. The non-employee director’s annual award of restricted stock units vest on the first anniversary of the grant date subject to special pro-rata vesting rules in the event of retirement or disability (as defined in the award agreement), or death. The vested restricted stock units are payable as soon as practicable following vesting except as otherwise provided pursuant to the non-employee director’s election to defer. Certain restricted stock units remain outstanding from the Director Plan. All such awards are fully vested and shall be distributed to the directors upon their separation from the Board.
As of December 31, 2018, 142,4142019, 165,768 restricted stock units are outstanding to non-employee directors under either the Omnibus Plan or the Director Plan. Of this amount, 53,42249,926 restricted stock units are unvested and expected to vest.
401(k) Match, Profit Sharing and Company Contribution. We have a voluntary 401(k) savings plan covering eligible employees that allows for periodic discretionary matches as a percentage of each participant’s contributions payable in cash for nonunion employees and generally payable in shares of NiSource common stock for union employees, subject to collective bargaining. We also have a retirement savings plan that provides for discretionary profit sharing contributions similarly payable in cash or shares of NiSource common stock to eligible employees based on earnings results;results, and eligible employees hired after January 1, 2010 receive a non-elective company contribution of 3% of eligible pay similarly payable in cash or shares of NiSource common stock.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016,2017, we recognized 401(k) match, profit sharing and non-elective contribution expense of $37.6$37.5 million, $37.6 million and $32.3$37.6 million, respectively.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
14. Long-Term Debt
Our long-term debt as of December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 is as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Long-term debt type | Maturity as of December 31,
2019 | Weighted average interest rate (%) | | Outstanding balance as of December 31, (in millions) |
| | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Senior notes: | | | | | | |
| NiSource | December 2021 | 4.45 | % | | 63.6 |
| | 63.6 |
|
| NiSource | November 2022 | 2.65 | % | | 500.0 |
| | 500.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2023 | 3.85 | % | | 250.0 |
| | 250.0 |
|
| NiSource | June 2023 | 3.65 | % | | 350.0 |
| | 350.0 |
|
| NiSource | November 2025 | 5.89 | % | | 265.0 |
| | 265.0 |
|
| NiSource | May 2027 | 3.49 | % | | 1,000.0 |
| | 1,000.0 |
|
| NiSource | December 2027 | 6.78 | % | | 3.0 |
| | 3.0 |
|
| NiSource | September 2029 | 2.95 | % | | 750.0 |
| | — |
|
| NiSource | December 2040 | 6.25 | % | | 250.0 |
| | 250.0 |
|
| NiSource | June 2041 | 5.95 | % | | 400.0 |
| | 400.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2042 | 5.80 | % | | 250.0 |
| | 250.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2043 | 5.25 | % | | 500.0 |
| | 500.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2044 | 4.80 | % | | 750.0 |
| | 750.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2045 | 5.65 | % | | 500.0 |
| | 500.0 |
|
| NiSource | May 2047 | 4.38 | % | | 1,000.0 |
| | 1,000.0 |
|
| NiSource | March 2048 | 3.95 | % | | 750.0 |
| | 750.0 |
|
| Total senior notes | | | | $ | 7,581.6 |
| | $ | 6,831.6 |
|
| Medium term notes: | | | | | | |
| NiSource | April 2022 to May 2027 | 7.99 | % | | $ | 49.0 |
| | $ | 49.0 |
|
| NIPSCO | August 2022 to August 2027 | 7.61 | % | | 68.0 |
| | 68.0 |
|
| Columbia of Massachusetts | December 2025 to February 2028 | 6.30 | % | | 40.0 |
| | 40.0 |
|
| Total medium term notes | | | | $ | 157.0 |
| | $ | 157.0 |
|
| Finance leases: | | | | | | |
| NiSource Corporate Services | January 2020 to November 2023 | 3.47 | % | | 22.3 |
| | 11.6 |
|
| Columbia of Ohio | October 2021 to March 2044 | 6.16 | % | | 94.8 |
| | 91.5 |
|
| Columbia of Virginia | July 2029 to November 2039 | 6.31 | % | | 19.1 |
| | 15.2 |
|
| Columbia of Kentucky | May 2027 | 3.79 | % | | 0.3 |
| | 0.3 |
|
| Columbia of Pennsylvania | August 2027 to May 2035 | 5.67 | % | | 20.7 |
| | 30.0 |
|
| Columbia of Massachusetts | December 2033 to November 2043 | 5.49 | % | | 44.3 |
| | 45.7 |
|
| Total finance leases | | | | 201.5 |
| | 194.3 |
|
| Pollution control bonds - NIPSCO | April 2019 | 5.85 | % | | — |
| | 41.0 |
|
| Unamortized issuance costs and discounts | | | | (70.5 | ) | | $ | (68.5 | ) |
| Total Long-Term Debt | | | | $ | 7,869.6 |
| | $ | 7,155.4 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Long-term debt type | Maturity as of December 31,
2018 | Weighted average interest rate (%) | | Outstanding balance as of December 31, (in millions) |
| | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Senior notes: | | | | | | |
| NiSource | March 2018 | 6.40 | % | | — |
| | 275.1 |
|
| NiSource | January 2019 | 6.80 | % | | — |
| | 255.1 |
|
| NiSource | September 2020 | 5.45 | % | | — |
| | 325.1 |
|
| NiSource | December 2021 | 4.45 | % | | 63.6 |
| | 63.6 |
|
| NiSource | March 2022 | 6.13 | % | | — |
| | 180.0 |
|
| NiSource | November 2022 | 2.65 | % | | 500.0 |
| | 500.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2023 | 3.85 | % | | 250.0 |
| | 250.0 |
|
| NiSource | June 2023 | 3.65 | % | | 350.0 |
| | — |
|
| NiSource | November 2025 | 5.89 | % | | 265.0 |
| | 265.0 |
|
| NiSource | May 2027 | 3.49 | % | | 1,000.0 |
| | 1,000.0 |
|
| NiSource | December 2027 | 6.78 | % | | 3.0 |
| | 3.0 |
|
| NiSource | December 2040 | 6.25 | % | | 250.0 |
| | 250.0 |
|
| NiSource | June 2041 | 5.95 | % | | 400.0 |
| | 400.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2042 | 5.80 | % | | 250.0 |
| | 250.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2043 | 5.25 | % | | 500.0 |
| | 500.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2044 | 4.80 | % | | 750.0 |
| | 750.0 |
|
| NiSource | February 2045 | 5.65 | % | | 500.0 |
| | 500.0 |
|
| NiSource | May 2047 | 4.38 | % | | 1,000.0 |
| | 1,000.0 |
|
| NiSource | March 2048 | 3.95 | % | | 750.0 |
| | 750.0 |
|
| Total senior notes | | | | $ | 6,831.6 |
| | $ | 7,516.9 |
|
| Medium term notes: | | | | | | |
| NiSource | April 2022 to May 2027 | 7.99 | % | | $ | 49.0 |
| | $ | 49.0 |
|
| NIPSCO | August 2022 to August 2027 | 7.61 | % | | 68.0 |
| | 68.0 |
|
| Columbia of Massachusetts | December 2025 to February 2028 | 6.30 | % | | 40.0 |
| | 40.0 |
|
| Total medium term notes | | | | $ | 157.0 |
| | $ | 157.0 |
|
| Capital leases: | | | | | | |
| NIPSCO | May 2018 | 3.95 | % | | $ | — |
| | $ | 3.8 |
|
| NiSource Corporate Services | January 2019 to October 2022 | 3.68 | % | | 11.6 |
| | 1.4 |
|
| Columbia of Ohio | October 2021 to June 2038 | 6.33 | % | | 91.5 |
| | 88.5 |
|
| Columbia of Virginia | July 2029 to December 2037 | 7.12 | % | | 15.2 |
| | 5.2 |
|
| Columbia of Kentucky | May 2027 | 3.79 | % | | 0.3 |
| | 0.4 |
|
| Columbia of Pennsylvania | August 2027 to June 2036 | 5.42 | % | | 30.0 |
| | 31.0 |
|
| Columbia of Massachusetts | December 2033 to November 2043 | 5.48 | % | | 45.7 |
| | 22.8 |
|
| Total capital leases | | | | 194.3 |
| | 153.1 |
|
| Pollution control bonds - NIPSCO | April 2019 | 5.85 | % | | 41.0 |
| | 41.0 |
|
| Unamortized issuance costs and discounts | | | | (68.5 | ) | | $ | (71.5 | ) |
| Total Long-Term Debt | | | | $ | 7,155.4 |
| | $ | 7,796.5 |
|
On April 1, 2019, NIPSCO repaid $41.0 million of 5.85% pollution control bonds at maturity.
On August 12, 2019, we closed our placement of $750.0 million of 2.95% senior unsecured notes maturing in 2029 which resulted in approximately $742.4 million of net proceeds after deducting commissions and expenses.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Details of our 2018 long-term debt related activity are summarized below:
On March 15, 2018, we redeemed $275.1 million of 6.40% senior unsecured notes at maturity.
In June 2018, we executed a tender offer for $209.0 million of outstanding notes consisting of a combination of our 6.80% notes due 2019, 5.45% notes due 2020, and 6.125% notes due 2022. In conjunction with the debt retired, we recorded a $12.5 million loss on early extinguishment of long-term debt, primarily attributable to early redemption premiums.
On June 11, 2018, we closed our private placement of $350.0 million of 3.65% senior unsecured notes maturing in 2023 which resulted in approximately $346.6 million of net proceeds after deducting commissions and expenses. We used the net proceeds from this private placement to pay a portion of the redemption price for the notes subject to the tender offer described above.
In July 2018, we redeemed $551.1 million of outstanding notes representing the remainder of our 6.80% notes due 2019, 5.45% notes due 2020 and 6.125% notes due 2022. During the third quarter of 2018, we recorded a $33.0 million loss on early extinguishment of long-term debt, primarily attributable to early redemption premiums.
Details of our 2017 long-term debt related activity are summarized below:
On March 27, 2017, we redeemed $30.0 million of 7.86% and $2.0 million of 7.85% medium-term notes at maturity.
On April 3, 2017, we redeemed $12.0 million of 7.82%, $10.0 million of 7.92%, $2.0 million of 7.93% and $1.0 million of 7.94% medium-term notes at maturity.
On May 22, 2017, we closed our placement of $2.0 billion in aggregate principal amount of our senior notes, comprised of $1.0 billion of 3.49% senior notes due 2027 and $1.0 billion of 4.375% senior notes due 2047. Related to this placement, we settled $950.0 million of aggregate notional value forward-starting interest rate swaps, originally entered into to mitigate interest risk associated with the planned issuance of these notes. Refer to Note 9, "Risk Management Activities," for additional information.
During the second quarter of 2017, we executed a tender offer for $990.7 million of outstanding notes consisting of a combination of our 6.40% notes due 2018, 6.80% notes due 2019, 5.45% notes due 2020, and 6.125% notes due 2022. In conjunction with the debt retired, we recorded a $111.5 million loss on early extinguishment of long-term debt, primarily attributable to early redemption premiums.
On June 12, 2017, NIPSCO redeemed $22.5 million of 7.59% medium-term notes at maturity.
On July 1, 2017, NIPSCO redeemed $55.0 million of 5.70% pollution control bonds at maturity.
On August 4, 2017, NIPSCO redeemed $5.0 million of 7.02% medium-term notes at maturity.
On September 14, 2017, we closed our placement of $750.0 million of 3.95% senior notes due 2048. Related to this placement, we settled $750.0 million of aggregate notional value treasury lock agreements, originally entered into to mitigate the interest risk associated with the planned issuance of these notes. Refer to Note 9, "Risk Management Activities," for additional information.
On September 15, 2017, we redeemed $210.4 million of 5.25% senior unsecured notes at maturity.
On November 17, 2017, we closed our placement of $500.0 million of 2.65% senior notes due 2022 to repay a $500.0 million variable-rate term loan due March 29, 2019. Related to this placement, we settled $250.0 million of aggregate notional value treasury lock agreements originally entered into to mitigate the interest risk associated with the planned issuance of these notes. Refer to Note 9, “Risk Management Activities,” for additional information.
See Note 18-A,19-A, "Contractual Obligations," for the outstanding long-term debt maturities at December 31, 2018.2019.
Unamortized debt expense, premium and discount on long-term debt applicable to outstanding bonds are being amortized over the life of such bonds.
We are subject to a financial covenant under our revolving credit facility and term loan agreement which requires us to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio that does not exceed 70%. A similar covenant in a 2005 private placement note purchase agreement requires us to maintain a debt to capitalization ratio that does not exceed 75%. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the ratio was 61.4%61.7%.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
We are also subject to certain other non-financial covenants under the revolving credit facility. Such covenants include a limitation on the creation or existence of new liens on our assets, generally exempting liens on utility assets, purchase money security interests, preexisting security interests and an additional subset of assets equal to $150 million. An asset sale covenant generally restricts the sale, conveyance, lease, transfer or other disposition of our assets to those dispositions that are for a price not materially less than fair market of such assets, that would not materially impair our ability to perform obligations under the revolving credit facility, and that together with all other such dispositions, would not have a material adverse effect. The covenant also restricts dispositions to no more than 10% of our consolidated total assets on December 31, 2015. The revolving credit facility also includes a cross-default provision, which triggers an event of default under the credit facility in the event of an uncured payment default relating to any indebtedness of us or any of our subsidiaries in a principal amount of $50.0 million or more.
Our indentures generally do not contain any financial maintenance covenants. However, our indentures are generally subject to cross-default provisions ranging from uncured payment defaults of $5 million to $50 million, and limitations on the incurrence of liens on our assets, generally exempting liens on utility assets, purchase money security interests, preexisting security interests and an additional subset of assets capped at 10% of our consolidated net tangible assets.
15. Short-Term Borrowings
We generate short-term borrowings from our revolving credit facility, commercial paper program, letter of credit issuances, accounts receivable transfer programs and term loan borrowings. Each of these borrowing sources is described further below.
We maintain a revolving credit facility to fund ongoing working capital requirements, including the provision of liquidity support for our commercial paper program, provide for issuance of letters of credit and also for general corporate purposes. Our revolving credit facility has a program limit of $1.85 billion and is comprised of a syndicate of banks led by Barclays. On February 20, 2019, we extended the termination date of our revolving credit facility to February 20, 2024. At December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we had no0 outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Our commercial paper program has a program limit of up to $1.5 billion with a dealer group comprised of Barclays, Citigroup, Credit Suisse and Wells Fargo. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, weWe had $978.0$570.0 million and $869.0$978.0 million respectively, of commercial paper outstanding.
Asoutstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and 2017, we had issued $10.2 million and $11.1 million of stand-by letters of credit, respectively. All stand-by letters of credit were under the revolving credit facility.
Transfers of accounts receivable are accounted for as secured borrowings resulting in the recognition of short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance SheetsSheets. We had $353.2 million and $399.2 million in the amount of $399.2 million and $336.7 milliontransfers as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. Refer to Note 17,18, "Transfers of Financial Assets," for additional information.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
On April 18, 2018,17, 2019, we entered into a multiple-draw $600.0 millionamended our existing term loan agreement with a syndicate of banks, led bywith MUFG Bank Ltd. as the Administrative Agent, Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner. The amendment increased the amount of our term loan maturesfrom $600.0 million to $850.0 million and extended the maturity date to April 17, 2019, at which point any and all outstanding borrowings under the agreement are due.16, 2020. Interest charged on borrowings depends on the variable rate structure we electedelect at the time of each borrowing. The available variable rate structures from which we may choose are defined in the term loan agreement. Under the agreement, we borrowed an initial tranche of $150.0$850.0 million on April 18, 201817, 2019 with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 5060 basis points and a second tranche of $450.0 million on May 31, 2018 with an interest rate of LIBOR plus 55 basis points.
Short-term borrowings were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 |
Commercial Paper weighted-average interest rate of 2.03% and 2.96% at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | $ | 570.0 |
| | $ | 978.0 |
|
| Accounts receivable securitization facility borrowings | 353.2 |
| | 399.2 |
|
| Term loan weighted-average interest rate of 2.40% and 3.07% at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | 850.0 |
| | $ | 600.0 |
|
| Total Short-Term Borrowings | $ | 1,773.2 |
| | $ | 1,977.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 |
Commercial Paper weighted average interest rate of 2.96% and 1.97% at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. | $ | 978.0 |
| | $ | 869.0 |
|
| Accounts receivable securitization facility borrowings | 399.2 |
| | 336.7 |
|
| Term loan weighted-average interest rate of 3.07% at December 31, 2018 | 600.0 |
| | — |
|
| Total Short-Term Borrowings | $ | 1,977.2 |
| | $ | 1,205.7 |
|
Other than for the term loan and certain commercial paper borrowings, cash flows related to the borrowings and repayments of the items listed above are presented net in the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows as their maturities are less than 90 days.
16. Leases
ASC 842 Adoption. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (ASC 842). ASU 2016-02 introduces a lessee model that brings most leases onto the balance sheet. The standard requires that lessees recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases, as that term is defined in the standard) at the lease commencement date: (1) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (2) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. In 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-01, Leases (ASC 842): Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to ASC 842, which allows us to not evaluate existing land easements under ASC 842, and ASU 2018-11, Leases (ASC 842): Targeted Improvements, which allows calendar year entities to initially apply ASC 842 prospectively from January 1, 2019.
We adopted the provisions of ASC 842 beginning on January 1, 2019, using the transition method provided in ASU 2018-11, which was applied to all existing leases at that date. As such, results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2019 will be presented under ASC 842, while prior period amounts will continue to be reported in accordance with ASC 840. We elected a number of practical expedients, including the "practical expedient package" described in ASC 842-10-65-1 and the provisions of ASU 2018-01, which allows us to not evaluate existing land easements under ASC 842. Further, ASC 842 provides lessees the option of electing an accounting policy, by class of underlying asset, in which the lessee may choose not to separate nonlease components from lease components. We elected this practical expedient for our leases of fleet vehicles, IT assets and railcars. We elected to use a practical expedient that allows the use of hindsight in determining lease terms when evaluating leases that existed at the implementation date. We also elected the short-term lease recognition exemption, allowing us to not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities for all leases that qualify.
Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of additional lease liabilities and corresponding ROU assets of $57.0 million on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 1, 2019. The standard had no material impact on our Statements of Consolidated Income (Loss) or our Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.
Lease Descriptions. We are the lessee for substantially all of our leasing activity, which includes operating and finance leases for corporate and field offices, railcars, fleet vehicles and certain IT assets. Our corporate and field office leases have remaining lease terms between 1 and 24 years with options to renew the leases for up to 25 years. We lease railcars to transport coal to and from our electric generation facilities in Indiana. Our railcars are specifically identified in the lease agreements and have lease terms between 1 and 3 years with options to renew for 1 year. Our fleet vehicles include trucks, trailers and equipment that have been customized specifically for use in the utility industry. We lease fleet vehicles on 1 year terms, after which we have the option to extend on a month-to-month basis or terminate with written notice. ROU assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets do not include obligations for possible fleet vehicle lease renewals beyond the initial lease term. While we have the ability to renew these leases beyond the initial term, we are not reasonably certain (as that term is defined in ASC 842) to do so. We lease the majority of our IT assets under 4 year lease terms. Ownership of leased IT assets is transferred to us at the end of the lease term.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
We have not provided material residual value guarantees for our leases, nor do our leases contain material restrictions or covenants. Lease contracts containing renewal and termination options are mostly exercisable at our sole discretion. Certain of our real estate and railcar leases include renewal periods in the measurement of the lease obligation if we have deemed the renewals reasonably certain to be exercised.
With respect to service contracts involving the use of assets, if we have the right to direct the use of the asset and obtain substantially all economic benefits from the use of an asset, we account for the service contract as a lease. Unless specifically provided to us by the lessor, we utilize NiSource's collateralized incremental borrowing rate commensurate to the lease term as the discount rate for all of our leases.
Lease costs for the year ended December 31, 2019 are presented in the table below. These costs include both amounts recognized in expense and amounts capitalized as part of the cost of another asset. Income statement presentation for these costs (when ultimately recognized on the income statement) is also included:
|
| | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | Income Statement Classification | 2019 |
| Finance lease cost | | |
| Amortization of right-of-use assets | Depreciation and amortization | $ | 15.5 |
|
| Interest on lease liabilities | Interest expense, net | 11.3 |
|
| Total finance lease cost | | 26.8 |
|
| Operating lease cost | Operation and maintenance | 17.9 |
|
| Short-term lease cost | Operation and maintenance | 1.0 |
|
| Total lease cost | | $ | 45.7 |
|
Our right-of-use assets and liabilities are presented in the following lines on the Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
| | | | |
| (in millions) | Balance Sheet Classification | December 31, 2019 |
| Assets | | |
| Finance leases | Net Property, Plant and Equipment | $ | 179.5 |
|
| Operating leases | Deferred charges and other | 64.2 |
|
| Total leased assets | | 243.7 |
|
| Liabilities | | |
| Current | | |
| Finance leases | Current portion of long-term debt | 13.4 |
|
| Operating leases | Other accruals | 13.2 |
|
| Noncurrent | | |
| Finance leases | Long-term debt, excluding amounts due within one year | 188.1 |
|
| Operating leases | Other noncurrent liabilities | 51.6 |
|
| Total lease liabilities | | $ | 266.3 |
|
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Other pertinent information related to leases was as follows:
|
| | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 |
| Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities | |
| Operating cash flows used for finance leases | $ | 11.3 |
|
| Operating cash flows used for operating leases | 17.9 |
|
| Financing cash flows used for finance leases | 10.6 |
|
| Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations | |
| Finance leases | 26.4 |
|
| Operating leases | $ | 13.4 |
|
|
| | |
16. | Fair ValueDecember 31, 2019 |
| Weighted-average remaining lease term (years) | |
| Finance leases | 14.8 |
|
| Operating leases | 9.2 |
|
| Weighted-average discount rate | |
| Finance leases | 5.9 | % |
| Operating leases | 4.3 | % |
Maturities of our lease liabilities presented on a rolling 12-month basis were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2019, (in millions) | Total | Finance Leases | Operating Leases |
| Year 1 | $ | 42.8 |
| $ | 27.2 |
| $ | 15.6 |
|
| Year 2 | 36.7 |
| 27.3 |
| 9.4 |
|
| Year 3 | 35.0 |
| 26.8 |
| 8.2 |
|
| Year 4 | 30.7 |
| 23.1 |
| 7.6 |
|
| Year 5 | 26.5 |
| 19.9 |
| 6.6 |
|
| Thereafter | 233.3 |
| 201.6 |
| 31.7 |
|
Total lease payments(1) | 405.0 |
| 325.9 |
| 79.1 |
|
| Less: Imputed interest | (116.6 | ) | (102.3 | ) | (14.3 | ) |
| Less: Leases not yet commenced | (22.1 | ) | (22.1 | ) | — |
|
| Total | 266.3 |
| 201.5 |
| 64.8 |
|
| Reported as of December 31, 2019 | | | |
| Short-term lease liabilities | 26.6 |
| 13.4 |
| 13.2 |
|
| Long-term lease liabilities | 239.7 |
| 188.1 |
| 51.6 |
|
| Total lease liabilities | $ | 266.3 |
| $ | 201.5 |
| $ | 64.8 |
|
(1) Expected payments include obligations for leases not yet commenced of approximately $22.1 million for IT assets and interconnection facilities. These leases have terms between 4 years and 20 years, with estimated commencements in the first quarter of 2020 and in the third quarter of 2020.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Disclosures Related to Periods Prior to Adoption of ASC 842.We lease assets in several areas of our operations including fleet vehicles and equipment, rail cars for coal delivery and certain operations centers. Payments made in connection with operating leases were $49.1 million in 2018 and $49.5 million in 2017, and are primarily charged to operation and maintenance expense as incurred.
As of December 31, 2018, total contractual obligations for capital and operating leases were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | |
As of December 31, 2018, (in millions) | Total | Capital Leases(1) | Operating Leases(2) |
| 2019 | $ | 34.0 |
| $ | 23.0 |
| $ | 11.0 |
|
| 2020 | 29.8 |
| 22.5 |
| 7.3 |
|
| 2021 | 28.7 |
| 22.6 |
| 6.1 |
|
| 2022 | 26.3 |
| 22.1 |
| 4.2 |
|
| 2023 | 22.6 |
| 19.8 |
| 2.8 |
|
| Thereafter | 226.9 |
| 212.4 |
| 14.5 |
|
| Total lease payments | $ | 368.3 |
| $ | 322.4 |
| $ | 45.9 |
|
(2)Operating lease balances do not include obligations for possible fleet vehicle lease renewals beyond the initial lease term. While we have the ability to renew these leases beyond the initial term, we are not reasonably certain to do so. Expected payments are $26.7 million in 2019, $22.4 million in 2020, $16.6 million in 2021, $12.3 million in 2022, $9.3 million in 2023 and $8.8 million thereafter.
17. Fair Value
A.Fair Value Measurements
Recurring Fair Value Measurements. The following tables present financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of December 31, 20182019 and December 31, 2017:2018:
| | Recurring Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Balance as of December 31, 2018 | |
Recurring Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Balance as of December 31, 2019 |
| Assets | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Risk management assets | $ | — |
| | $ | 24.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 24.0 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 4.4 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 4.4 |
|
| Available-for-sale securities | — |
| | 138.3 |
| | — |
| | 138.3 |
| — |
| | 154.2 |
| | — |
| | 154.2 |
|
| Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 162.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 162.3 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 158.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 158.6 |
|
| Liabilities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Risk management liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 51.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 51.7 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 146.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 146.6 |
|
| Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 51.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 51.7 |
| $ | — |
| | $ | 146.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 146.6 |
|
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2017 (in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Balance as of December 31, 2017 |
| Assets | | | | | | | |
| Risk management assets | $ | — |
| | $ | 21.1 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 21.1 |
|
| Available-for-sale securities | — |
| | 133.9 |
| | — |
| | 133.9 |
|
| Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 155.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 155.0 |
|
| Liabilities | | | | | | | |
| Risk management liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 71.4 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 71.7 |
|
| Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 71.4 |
| | $ | 0.3 |
| | $ | 71.7 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Recurring Fair Value Measurements December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) | | Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) | | Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | Balance as of December 31, 2018 |
| Assets | | | | | | | |
| Risk management assets | $ | — |
| | $ | 24.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 24.0 |
|
| Available-for-sale securities | — |
| | 138.3 |
| | — |
| | 138.3 |
|
| Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 162.3 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 162.3 |
|
| Liabilities | | | | | | | |
| Risk management liabilities | $ | — |
| | $ | 51.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 51.7 |
|
| Total | $ | — |
| | $ | 51.7 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 51.7 |
|
Risk management assets and liabilities include interest rate swaps, exchange-traded NYMEX futures and NYMEX options and non-exchange-based forward purchase contracts. When utilized, exchange-traded derivative contracts are based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and are classified within Level 1. These financial assets and liabilities are secured with cash on deposit with the exchange; therefore, nonperformance risk has not been incorporated into these valuations. Certain non-exchange-traded derivatives are valued using broker or over-the-counter, on-line exchanges. In such cases, these non-exchange-traded derivatives are classified within Level 2. Non-exchange-based derivative instruments include swaps, forwards, options and treasury lock agreements.options. In certain instances, these instruments may utilize models to measure fair value. We use a similar model to value similar instruments. Valuation models utilize various inputs that include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, other observable inputs for the asset or liability and market-corroborated inputs, (i.e., inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means). Where observable inputs are available for substantially the full term of the asset or liability, the instrument is categorized within Level 2. Certain derivatives trade in less active markets with a lower availability of pricing information and models may be utilized in the valuation. When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instrument is categorized within Level 3. Credit risk is considered in the fair value calculation of derivative instruments that are not exchange-traded. Credit exposures are adjusted to reflect collateral agreements which reduce exposures. As of
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, there were no0 material transfers between fair value hierarchies. Additionally, there were no changes in the method or significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of our financial instruments.
We have entered into forward-starting interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk on coupon payments of forecasted issuances of long-term debt. These derivatives are designated as cash flow hedges. Credit risk is considered in the fair value calculation of each agreement. As they are based on observable data and valuations of similar instruments, the hedges are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. There was no exchange of premium at the initial date of the swaps and we can settle the contracts at any time. For additional information, see Note 9, "Risk Management Activities."
NIPSCO has entered into long-term forward natural gas purchase instruments that range from five to ten years to lock in a fixed price for its natural gas customers. We value these contracts using a pricing model that incorporates market-based information when available, as these instruments trade less frequently and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. For additional information see Note 9, “Risk Management Activities.”
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Available-for-sale securities are investments pledged as collateral for trust accounts related to our wholly-owned insurance company. Available-for-sale securities are included within “Other investments” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. We value U.S. Treasury, corporate debt and mortgage-backed securities using a matrix pricing model that incorporates market-based information. These securities trade less frequently and are classified within Level 2. Total unrealized gains and losses from available-for-sale securities are included in other comprehensive income. The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses and fair value of available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2019 and 2018 and 2017 were:
| | December 31, 2019 (in millions) | | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury debt securities | | $ | 31.4 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 31.4 |
|
| Corporate/Other debt securities | | 118.7 |
| | 4.2 |
| | (0.1 | ) | | 122.8 |
|
| Total | | $ | 150.1 |
| | $ | 4.3 |
| | $ | (0.2 | ) | | $ | 154.2 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2018 (in millions) | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value |
| Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury debt securities | $ | 23.6 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 23.6 |
| $ | 23.6 |
| | $ | 0.1 |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 23.6 |
|
| Corporate/Other debt securities | 117.7 |
| | 0.4 |
| | (3.4 | ) | | 114.7 |
| 117.7 |
| | 0.4 |
| | (3.4 | ) | | 114.7 |
|
| Total | $ | 141.3 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | (3.5 | ) | | $ | 138.3 |
| $ | 141.3 |
| | $ | 0.5 |
| | $ | (3.5 | ) | | $ | 138.3 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
December 31, 2017 (in millions) | Amortized Cost | | Gross Unrealized Gains | | Gross Unrealized Losses | | Fair Value | |
| Available-for-sale securities | | | | | | | | |
| U.S. Treasury debt securities | $ | 26.9 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | (0.1 | ) | | $ | 26.8 |
| |
| Corporate/Other debt securities | 106.8 |
| | 0.9 |
| | (0.6 | ) | | 107.1 |
| |
| Total | $ | 133.7 |
| | $ | 0.9 |
| | $ | (0.7 | ) | | $ | 133.9 |
| |
Realized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities were immaterial for the year-ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018.
The cost of maturities sold is based upon specific identification. At December 31, 2018,2019, approximately $2.9$7.7 million of U.S. Treasury debt securities and approximately $2.7$6.0 million of Corporate/Other debt securities have maturities of less than a year.
There are no material items in the fair value reconciliation of Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 20172018.
Non-recurring Fair Value Measurements. There were no significant non-recurringWe measure the fair value measurements recorded duringof certain assets on a non-recurring basis, typically annually or when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the twelve months endedcarrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. These assets include goodwill and other intangible assets.
At December 31, 2018.2019, we recorded an impairment charge of $204.8 million for goodwill and an impairment charge of $209.7 million for franchise rights, in each case related to Columbia of Massachusetts. For additional information, see Note 6, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.”
B. Other Fair Value Disclosures for Financial Instruments. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, notes receivable, customer deposits and short-term borrowings is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to their liquid or short-term nature. Our long-term borrowings are recorded at historical amounts.
The following method and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments.
Long-term debt. The fair value of outstanding long-term debt is estimated based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar securities. Certain premium costs associated with the early settlement of long-term debt are not taken into consideration
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
in determining fair value. These fair value measurements are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. For the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, there was no change in the method or significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of long-term debt.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
The carrying amount and estimated fair values of these financial instruments were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | Carrying Amount 2019 | | Estimated Fair Value 2019 | | Carrying Amount 2018 | | Estimated Fair Value 2018 |
| Long-term debt (including current portion) | $ | 7,869.6 |
| | $ | 8,764.4 |
| | $ | 7,155.4 |
| | $ | 7,228.3 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | Carrying Amount 2018 | | Estimated Fair Value 2018 | | Carrying Amount 2017 | | Estimated Fair Value 2017 |
| Long-term debt (including current portion) | $ | 7,155.4 |
| | $ | 7,228.3 |
| | $ | 7,796.5 |
| | $ | 8,603.4 |
|
| |
17. | Transfers of Financial Assets |
18. Transfers of Financial Assets
Columbia of Ohio, NIPSCO and Columbia of Pennsylvania each maintain a receivables agreement whereby they transfer their customer accounts receivables to third party financial institutions through wholly-owned and consolidated special purpose entities. The three agreements expire between March 2019May 2020 and October 20192020 and may be further extended if mutually agreed to by the parties thereto.
All receivables transferred to third parties are valued at face value, which approximates fair value due to their short-term nature. The amount of the undivided percentage ownership interest in the accounts receivables transferred is determined in part by required loss reserves under the agreements.
Transfers of accounts receivable are accounted for as secured borrowings resulting in the recognition of short-term borrowings on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of December 31, 2018,2019, the maximum amount of debt that could be recognized related to our accounts receivable programs is $455.0$465.0 million.
The following table reflects the gross receivables balance and net receivables transferred as well as short-term borrowings related to the securitization transactions as of December 31, 20182019 and 2017:2018:
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Gross receivables | $ | 569.1 |
| | $ | 694.4 |
|
| Less: receivables not transferred | 215.9 |
| | 295.2 |
|
| Net receivables transferred | $ | 353.2 |
| | $ | 399.2 |
|
| Short-term debt due to asset securitization | $ | 353.2 |
| | $ | 399.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | |
At December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Gross Receivables | $ | 694.4 |
| | $ | 635.3 |
|
| Less: Receivables not transferred | 295.2 |
| | 298.6 |
|
| Net receivables transferred | $ | 399.2 |
| | $ | 336.7 |
|
| Short-term debt due to asset securitization | $ | 399.2 |
| | $ | 336.7 |
|
During 2019, $46.0 million was recorded as cash flows used for financing activities related to the change in short-term borrowings due to securitization transactions. During 2018, and 2017, $62.5 million and $26.7 million, respectively, was recorded as cash flows from financing activities related to the change in short-term borrowings due to securitization transactions. Fees associated with the securitization transactions were $2.6 million, $2.5$2.6 million and $2.3$2.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Columbia of Ohio, NIPSCO and 2016, respectively. WeColumbia of Pennsylvania remain responsible for collecting on the receivables securitized, and the receivables cannot be transferred to another party.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
18.19. Other Commitments and Contingencies
A. Contractual Obligations. We have certain contractual obligations requiring payments at specified periods. The obligations include long-term debt, lease obligations, energy commodity contracts and obligations for various services including pipeline capacity and outsourcing of IT services. The total contractual obligations in existence at December 31, 20182019 and their maturities were:
| | | (in millions) | Total | | 2019 | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | After | Total | | 2020 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2023 | | 2024 | | After |
Long-term debt (1) | $ | 7,029.6 |
| | $ | 41.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 63.6 |
| | $ | 530.0 |
| | $ | 600.0 |
| | $ | 5,795.0 |
| $ | 7,738.6 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 63.6 |
| | $ | 530.0 |
| | $ | 600.0 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 6,545.0 |
|
Capital leases(2) | 322.4 |
| | 23.0 |
| | 22.5 |
| | 22.6 |
| | 22.1 |
| | 19.8 |
| | 212.4 |
| |
| Interest payments on long-term debt | 6,311.7 |
| | 319.8 |
| | 318.6 |
| | 318.6 |
| | 315.0 |
| | 289.0 |
| | 4,750.7 |
| 6,214.2 |
| | 342.0 |
| | 340.7 |
| | 337.1 |
| | 311.1 |
| | 299.9 |
| | 4,583.4 |
|
Finance leases(2) | | 325.9 |
| | 27.2 |
| | 27.3 |
| | 26.8 |
| | 23.1 |
| | 19.9 |
| | 201.6 |
|
Operating leases(3) | 45.9 |
| | 11.0 |
| | 7.3 |
| | 6.1 |
| | 4.2 |
| | 2.8 |
| | 14.5 |
| 79.1 |
| | 15.6 |
| | 9.4 |
| | 8.2 |
| | 7.6 |
| | 6.6 |
| | 31.7 |
|
Energy commodity contracts | 154.3 |
| | 99.2 |
| | 55.1 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 95.9 |
| | 65.5 |
| | 30.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Service obligations: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Pipeline service obligations | 3,566.7 |
| | 592.3 |
| | 487.7 |
| | 450.5 |
| | 437.5 |
| | 260.8 |
| | 1,337.9 |
| 3,450.7 |
| | 605.0 |
| | 590.1 |
| | 546.8 |
| | 357.2 |
| | 237.5 |
| | 1,114.1 |
|
| IT service obligations | 211.0 |
| | 68.3 |
| | 60.0 |
| | 47.1 |
| | 35.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| 153.2 |
| | 63.6 |
| | 49.4 |
| | 38.0 |
| | 1.1 |
| | 1.1 |
| | — |
|
Other service obligations | 86.7 |
| | 33.5 |
| | 43.6 |
| | 9.6 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 59.8 |
| | 45.8 |
| | 14.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Other liabilities | 24.2 |
| | 24.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| 27.3 |
| | 27.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total contractual obligations | $ | 17,752.5 |
| | $ | 1,212.3 |
| | $ | 994.8 |
| | $ | 918.1 |
| | $ | 1,344.4 |
| | $ | 1,172.4 |
| | $ | 12,110.5 |
| $ | 18,144.7 |
| | $ | 1,192.0 |
| | $ | 1,124.9 |
| | $ | 1,486.9 |
| | $ | 1,300.1 |
| | $ | 565.0 |
| | $ | 12,475.8 |
|
(1) Long-term debt balance excludes unamortized issuance costs and discounts of $68.5$70.5 million.
(2) Capital Finance lease payments shown above are inclusive of interest totaling $114.6$108.3 million.
(3) Operating lease payments shown above are inclusive of interest totaling $14.3 million. Operating lease balances do not include amountsobligations for possible fleet leases that can be renewedvehicle lease renewals beyond the initial lease term. The Company anticipates renewingWhile we have the ability to renew these leases beyond the initial term, butwe are not reasonably certain (as that term is defined in ASC 842) to do so. If we were to continue the anticipatedfleet vehicle leases outstanding at December 31, 2019, payments associated with the renewals do not meet the definitionwould be $34.5 million in 2020, $28.3 million in 2021, $23.4 million in 2022, $19.9 million in 2023, $15.2 million in 2024 and $15.2 million thereafter.
(4)In January 2020, NIPSCO signed new coal contract commitments of expected minimum lease payments and therefore$14.4 million for 2020. These contracts are not included above. Expected payments are $26.7 million in 2019, $22.4 million in 2020, $16.6 million in 2021, $12.3 million in 2022, $9.3 million in 2023 and $8.8 million thereafter.
(5)In February 2020, NIPSCO signed a new railcar coal transportation contract commitment of $12.0 million for 2020. This contract is not included above.
Operating and CapitalFinance Lease Commitments.We lease assets in several areas of our operations including corporate and field offices, railcars, fleet vehicles and equipment, rail cars for coal delivery and certain operations centers.IT assets. Payments made in connection with operating and month-to-month leases were $52.5 million in 2019, $49.1 million in 2018 and $49.5 million in 2017, and $52.0 million in 2016, and are primarily charged to operation and maintenance expense as incurred. Capital lease assets and related accumulated depreciation included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets were $213.9 million and $37.1 million at December 31, 2018, and $171.2 million and $32.4 million at December 31, 2017, respectively.See Note 16, "Leases" for additional details.
Purchase and Service Obligations. We have entered into various purchase and service agreements whereby we are contractually obligated to make certain minimum payments in future periods. Our purchase obligations are for the purchase of physical quantities of natural gas, electricity and coal. Our service agreements encompass a broad range of business support and maintenance functions which are generally described below.
Our subsidiaries have entered into various energy commodity contracts to purchase physical quantities of natural gas, electricity and coal. These amounts represent minimum quantities of these commodities we are obligated to purchase at both fixed and variable prices. To the extent contractual purchase prices are variable, obligations disclosed in the table above are valued at market prices as of December 31, 2018.2019.
In July 2008, the IURC issued an order approving NIPSCO’s purchase power agreements with subsidiaries of Iberdrola Renewables, Buffalo Ridge I LLC and Barton Windpower LLC. These agreements provide NIPSCO the opportunity and obligation to purchase up to 100 MW of wind power generated commencing in early 2009. The contracts extend 15 and 20 years, representing 50 MW of wind power each. No minimum quantities are specified within these agreements due to the variability of electricity generation from wind, so no amounts related to these contracts are included in the table above. Upon any termination of the agreements by NIPSCO for any reason (other than material breach by Buffalo Ridge I LLC or Barton Windpower LLC), NIPSCO may be required to pay a termination charge that could be material depending on the events giving rise to termination and the timing of the termination. NIPSCO began purchasing wind power in April 2009.
We have pipeline service agreements that provide for pipeline capacity, transportation and storage services. These agreements, which have expiration dates ranging from 20192020 to 2045, require us to pay fixed monthly charges.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NIPSCO has contracts with three3 major rail operators providing for coal transportation services for which there are certain minimum payments. These service contracts extend for various periods through 2021.
In May and June 2017, weWe have executed agreements with three separatemultiple IT service providers. The new agreements have terms ending atextend for various dates throughout 2022.periods through 2024.
Related to the NTSB's safety recommendations issued on November 14, 2018 (see "- C. Legal Proceedings" for further detail), we committed to the installation of over-pressurization protection devices at all of the remaining low pressure systems in our operating footprint. This installation is expected to result in a capital investment of approximately $150 million. This amount is not included in the table above.
B. Guarantees and Indemnities. We and certain subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance to third parties on behalf of certain subsidiaries as part of normal business. Such agreements include guarantees and stand-by letters of credit. These agreements are entered into primarily to support or enhance the creditworthiness otherwise attributed to a subsidiary on a stand-alone basis, thereby facilitating the extension of sufficient credit to accomplish the subsidiaries’ intended commercial purposes. At December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we had issued stand-by letters of credit of $10.2 million and $11.1 million, respectively, for the benefit of third parties.
C. Legal Proceedings.
On September 13, 2018, a series of fires and explosions occurred in Lawrence, Andover and North Andover, Massachusetts related to the delivery of natural gas by Columbia of Massachusetts.Massachusetts (the "Greater Lawrence Incident"). The Greater Lawrence Incident resulted in one fatality and a number of injuries, damaged multiple homes and businesses, and caused the temporary evacuation of significant portions of each municipality. The Massachusetts Governor’s Office declared a state of emergency, authorizing the Massachusetts DPU to order another utility company to coordinate the restoration of utility services in Lawrence, Andover and North Andover. The incident resulted in the interruption of gas for approximately 7,500 gas meters, the majority of which serveserved residences and approximately 700 of which approximately 700 serveserved businesses, and the interruption of other utility service more broadly in the area. Columbia of Massachusetts has replaced the cast iron and bare steel gas pipeline system in the affected area and restored service to nearly all of the gas meters. See “ - E. Other Matters - Greater Lawrence Pipeline Replacement” below for more information.
We are subject to inquiries by federal and stateinvestigations by government authorities and regulatory agencies regarding the Greater Lawrence Incident. The NTSB,Incident, including the U.S Attorney’s officeMassachusetts DPU and the SEC have pending investigations relatedMassachusetts Attorney General's Office, as described below. We are cooperating with all inquiries and investigations. In addition, on February 26, 2020, the Company and Columbia of Massachusetts entered into agreements with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to resolve the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s investigation relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident, as described below. We are also subject to inquiries from the Massachusetts DPU and the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office. We are cooperating with all inquiries and investigations. The outcomes and impacts of the current investigations and any future investigations that may be commenced related to such inquiries are uncertain at this time.
NTSB Investigation. Investigation. As noted above,previously disclosed, the NTSB is investigatingconcluded its investigation into the Greater Lawrence Incident.Incident, and we are implementing the 1 remaining safety recommendation resulting from the investigation.
Massachusetts Investigations. Under Massachusetts law, the DPU is authorized to investigate potential violations of pipeline safety regulations and to assess a civil penalty of up to $218,647 for a violation of federal pipeline safety regulations. A separate violation occurs for each day of violation up to $2.2 million for a related series of violations. The partiesMassachusetts DPU also is authorized to investigate potential violations of the investigation include the PHMSA, the Massachusetts DPU, Columbia of Massachusetts emergency response plan and policeto assess penalties of up to $250,000 per violation per day, or up to $20 million per related series of violations. Further, as a result of the declaration of emergency by the Governor, the DPU is authorized to investigate potential violations of the DPU's operational directives during the restoration efforts and fire first responders. We are cooperating withassess penalties of up to $1 million per violation. Pursuant to these authorities, the NTSB and have provided information to assist in its ongoing investigation into relevant facts related to the event, the probable cause, and its development of safety recommendations.
According to the preliminary public report that the NTSB issued on October 11, 2018, an over-pressurization of a low pressure gas distribution system occurred that was related to work being done on behalf ofDPU is investigating Columbia of Massachusetts on a pipeline replacement project in Lawrence. Accordingas described below. Columbia of Massachusetts will likely be subject to the report, sensing lines detected a drop in pressure in a portion of mainline that was being abandoned, causing a regulator to open up and increase pressure in the system to a level that exceeded the maximum allowable operating pressure of the distribution system.
On November 14, 2018, the NTSB issued an urgent safety recommendationreport regarding natural gas distribution system project development and review. In its report, the NTSB identified certain factors that it believes contributedpotential compliance actions related to the Greater Lawrence Incident and made safety recommendations. The NTSB recommended that the Commonwealthrestoration work following the incident, the timing and outcomes of Massachusetts eliminate the professional engineer licensure exemption for public utility work and require a professional engineer’s seal on public utility engineering drawings, which is now law in Massachusetts. The NTSB also made recommendations to us related to engineering plan and constructability review processes, records and documentation, management of change processes, and control procedures during modifications to gas mains. We are in the process of implementing these recommendations. The NTSB investigation is ongoing. While the NTSB investigation is pending, we are prohibited from disclosing information related to the investigation without approval from the NTSB.uncertain at this time.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
SinceAfter the Greater Lawrence Incident, we have identified, and moved ahead with, new steps to enhance system safety and reliability and to safeguard against over-pressurization. Some of these measures have already been completed and others are in process. These Company-wide safety measures will include enhanced measures as called for in the NTSB’s recommendations. We have committed to a program to install over-pressurization protection devices on all of our low-pressure systems, the cost of which is described in “ - E. Other Matters.”
Massachusetts Regulatory and Legislative Matters. The Massachusetts DPU has retained an independent evaluator to conduct a statewide examination of the safety of the natural gas distribution system and the operational and maintenance functions of natural gas companies in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Through authority granted by the Massachusetts Governor under the state of emergency, the Chair of the Massachusetts DPU will directhas directed all natural gas distribution companies operating in the Commonwealth to fund the statewide examination. The statewide examination is underwaycomplete. The Phase I report, which was issued in May 2019, included a program level assessment and we areevaluation of natural gas distribution companies. The Phase I report's conclusions were statewide and contained no specific conclusions about Columbia of Massachusetts. Phase II, which was focused on field assessments of each Massachusetts gas company, concluded in the process of respondingDecember 2019. The Phase II report made several observations about and recommendations to the evaluator’s information requests. The independent evaluator is expected to produce a report with recommendations. The examination is expected to complement, but not duplicate, the NTSB’s investigation.
On November 30, 2018,Massachusetts gas companies, including Columbia of Massachusetts, entered into a consent order with the Massachusetts DPU in connection with a notice of probable violationregard to safety culture and assets. The final report was issued in March 2018, stemming fromlate January 2020, and the DPU directed each natural gas distribution company operating in Massachusetts to submit a 2016 report. The Division found that Columbiaplan in response to the report no later than February 28, 2020.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to pressure limiting and regulating stations in Taunton, Massachusetts. As part of the consent order, Columbia of Massachusetts was fined $75,000 and entered into a compliance agreement under which it agreed to take several actions related to its pressure regulator stations within various timeframes, including the adoption of a Pipeline Safety Management System ("SMS"), the American Petroleum Institute’s (API) Recommended Practice 1173. Columbia of Massachusetts is complying with the order.Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
On December 18, 2018,September 11, 2019, the Massachusetts DPU issued an order requiring Columbia of Massachusetts to enter into an agreement with a Massachusetts-based engineering firm to monitor Columbia of Massachusetts’ remaining restoration and recovery work in the Greater Lawrence area. The order requiresdirecting Columbia of Massachusetts to take measuresseveral specific actions to ensure that adequate heat and hot water and gas appliances are providedaddress concerns related to all affected properties, repave all affected streets, roadways, sidewalks and other areas in accordance with applicable DPU standards and precedents, consult withservice lines abandoned during the affected communities and discuss plans for restoring affected hard or soft surfaces, and replace all gas boilers and furnaces and other gas-fired equipment at affected residences. Under the order, all restoration work beginning infollowing the Greater Lawrence Incident and to furnish certain information and periodic reports to the DPU.
On October 1, 2019, is requiredthe Massachusetts DPU issued four orders to be completed no later than October 31, 2019, unless an earlier or later date is agreed to with any of the affected communities. We have agreed to complete the work by September 15, 2019. Also, under the order, Columbia of Massachusetts willin connection with the service lines abandoned during the Greater Lawrence Incident restoration, which require: (1) the submission of a detailed work plan to the DPU, (2) the completion of quality control work on certain abandoned services, (3) the payment for a third-party independent audit, to be required to maintain quantitative measures, which must be verified by officialscontracted through the DPU, of all gas pipeline work completed as part of the affected communities,incident restoration effort, and (4) prompt and full response to trackany requests for information by the third-party auditor. The Massachusetts DPU retained an independent evaluator to conduct this audit, and that third party is currently evaluating compliance with Massachusetts and federal law, as well as any other operational or safety risks that may be posed by the pipeline work. The audit scope also includes Columbia of Massachusetts' operations in the Lawrence Division and other service territories as appropriate.
Also in October 2019, the Massachusetts DPU issued three additional orders requiring: (1) daily leak surveillance and reporting in areas where abandoned services are located, (2) completion by November 15, 2019 of the work plan previously submitted describing how Columbia of Massachusetts would address the estimated 2,200 locations at which an inside meter set was moved outside the property as part of the abandoned service work completed during the Greater Lawrence Incident restoration, and (3) submission of a report by December 2, 2019 showing any patterns, trends or correlations among the non-compliant work related to the abandonment of service lines, gate boxes and curb boxes during the incident restoration.
On October 3, 2019, the Massachusetts DPU notified Columbia of Massachusetts that, absent DPU approval, it is currently allowed to perform only emergency work on its progressgas distribution system throughout its service territories in completingMassachusetts. The restrictions do not apply to Columbia of Massachusetts’ work to address the previously identified issues with abandoned service lines and valve boxes in the Greater Lawrence, Massachusetts area. Columbia of Massachusetts is subject to daily monitoring by the DPU on any work that Columbia of Massachusetts conducts in Massachusetts. Such restrictions on work remain in place until modified by the DPU.
On October 25, 2019, the Massachusetts DPU issued two orders opening public investigations into Columbia of Massachusetts with respect to the Greater Lawrence Incident. The Massachusetts DPU opened the first investigation under its authority to determine compliance with federal and state pipeline safety laws and regulations, and to investigate Columbia of Massachusetts’ responsibility for and response to the Greater Lawrence Incident and its restoration efforts following the incident. The Massachusetts DPU opened the second investigation under its authority to determine whether a gas distribution company has violated established standards regarding acceptable performance for emergency preparedness and restoration of service to investigate efforts by Columbia of Massachusetts to prepare for and restore service following the Greater Lawrence Incident. Separate penalties are applicable under each exercise of authority.
On December 23, 2019, the Massachusetts DPU issued an order defining the scope of its investigation into the response of Columbia of Massachusetts related to the Greater Lawrence Incident. The DPU identified three distinct time frames in which Columbia of Massachusetts handled emergency response and restoration directly: (1) September 13-14, 2018, (2) September 21 through December 16, 2018 (the Phase I restoration), and (3) September 27, 2019 through completion of restoration of outages resulting from the gas release event in Lawrence, Massachusetts that occurred on September 27, 2019. The DPU determined that it is appropriate to investigate separately, for each time period described above, the areas of response, recovery and restoration for which Columbia of Massachusetts was responsible. The DPU noted that it also may investigate the continued restoration and related repair work that took place after December 16, 2018 and, depending on the outcome of that investigation, may deem it appropriate to consider that period of restoration as an additional separate time period.
The DPU also noted that its investigation into all of the remaining work. Estimates forabove described time periods is ongoing and that if the cost of this work are included inDPU determines, based on its investigation, that it is appropriate to treat the estimated ranges of loss noted below, which is discussed in “- E. Other Matters - Greater Lawrence Incident Restoration" and " - Greater Lawrence Pipeline Replacement” below. Our failure to adhere to any of the requirements in the orderseparate time frames as separate emergency events, it may result in penalties ofimpose up to $1 million per violation.
Under Massachusetts law,the maximum statutory penalty for each event, pursuant to Mass. G.L. c. 164 Section 1J. This provision authorizes the DPU is authorized to investigate potential violations of pipeline safety regulations and to assess a civil penalty of up to $209,000 for a violation of federal pipeline safety regulations. A separate violation occurs for each day of violation up to $2.1 million for a related series of violations. The Massachusetts DPU also is authorized to investigate potential violations of the Columbia of Massachusetts emergency response plan and to assess penalties of up to $250,000 per violation per day, or up to $20 million per related series of violations. Further, as a resultThe DPU noted that at this preliminary stage of the declaration of emergency byinvestigation, it does not have the Governor,factual basis to make those determinations.
In connection with its investigation related to the DPU is authorized to investigate potential violations ofGreater Lawrence Incident, on February 4, 2020, the DPU's operational directives duringMassachusetts Attorney General's Office issued a request for documents primarily focused on the restoration efforts and assess penaltieswork following the incident.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to $1 million per violation. The timing and outcomeConsolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Columbia of any suchMassachusetts is cooperating with the investigations set forth above as well as other inquiries resulting from an increased amount of enforcement activity, for all of which the outcomes are uncertain at this time.
In December 2018,Massachusetts Legislative Matters. On November 12, 2019, the President of Columbia of Massachusetts testified beforeJoint Committee on Telecommunications, Utilities and Energy held a joint state legislative committeehearing that focused on telecommunications, utilities and energy with other industry officials about gas system safety, in Massachusetts and regulatory oversight.but the Committee has not taken action on any bills. Increased scrutiny related to these matters,gas system safety and regulatory oversight in Massachusetts, including additional legislative oversight hearings and new legislative proposals, is expected to continue during the current two-year legislative session.session that ends in December 2020.
On December 31, 2018, the Massachusetts Governor signed into law legislation requiring a certified professional engineer to review and approve gas pipeline work that could pose a “material risk” to public safety, consistent with the NTSB’s recommendation. The Massachusetts DPU has issued interim guidelines and the existing moratorium has been lifted.
U.S. Department of Justice Investigation. TheAs previously disclosed, the Company and Columbia of Massachusetts are subject to a criminal investigation related to the Greater Lawrence Incident that is being conducted under the supervision of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts.Office. The initial grand jurysubpoenas were served on the Company and Columbia of Massachusetts on September 24, 2018. The Company and Columbia of Massachusetts are cooperating with the investigation. We are unable to estimate the
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
amount (or range of amounts) of reasonably possible losses associated with any civil or criminal penalties that could be imposed on the Company or Columbia of Massachusetts.
U.S. Congressional Hearing. In November 2018, executives ofOn February 26, 2020, the Company and Columbia of Massachusetts testifiedentered into agreements with the U.S. Attorney’s Office to resolve the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s investigation relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident. Columbia of Massachusetts agreed to plead guilty in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts (the “Court”) to violating the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act (the “Plea Agreement”), and the Company entered into a DPA.
Under the Plea Agreement, which must be approved by the Court, Columbia of Massachusetts will be subject to the following terms, among others: (i) a criminal fine in the amount of $53,030,116 paid within 30 days of sentencing; (ii) a three year probationary period that will early terminate upon a sale of Columbia of Massachusetts or a sale of its gas distribution business to a qualified third-party buyer consistent with certain requirements; (iii) compliance with each of the NTSB recommendations stemming from the Greater Lawrence Incident; and (iv) employment of an in-house monitor during the term of the probationary period.
Under the DPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office agreed to defer prosecution of the Company in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident for a three-year period (which three-year period may be extended for twelve (12) months upon the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s determination of a breach of the DPA) subject to certain obligations of the Company, including, but not limited to, the following: (i) the Company will use reasonable best efforts to sell Columbia of Massachusetts or Columbia of Massachusetts’ gas distribution business to a qualified third-party buyer consistent with certain requirements, and, upon the completion of any such sale, the Company will cease and desist any and all gas pipeline and distribution activities in the District of Massachusetts; (ii) the Company will forfeit and pay, within 30 days of the later of the sale becoming final or the date on which post-closing adjustments to the purchase price are finally determined in accordance with the agreement to sell Columbia Gas of Massachusetts or its gas distribution business, a fine equal to the total amount of any profit or gain from any sale of Columbia of Massachusetts or its gas distribution business, with the amount of profit or gain determined as provided in the DPA; and (iii) the Company agrees as to each of the Company’s subsidiaries involved in the distribution of gas through pipeline facilities in Massachusetts, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Kentucky and Virginia to implement and adhere to each of the recommendations from the NTSB stemming from the Greater Lawrence Incident. Pursuant to the DPA, if the Company complies with all of its obligations under the DPA, including, but not limited to those identified above, the U.S. Attorney’s Office will not file any criminal charges against the Company related to the Greater Lawrence Incident. If Columbia of Massachusetts’ guilty plea is not accepted by the Court or is withdrawn for any reason, or if Columbia of Massachusetts should fail to perform an obligation under the Plea Agreement prior to the sale of Columbia of Massachusetts or its gas distribution business, the U.S. Attorney's Office may, at aits sole option, render the DPA null and void.
U.S. Congressional Activity. On September 30, 2019, the U.S. Pipeline Safety Act expired. There is no effect on PHMSA's authority. Action on past re-authorization bills has extended past the expiration date and action on this re-authorization is expected to continue well into 2020. Pipeline safety jurisdiction resides with the U.S. Senate hearing regardingCommerce Committee, and is divided between two committees in the U.S. House of Representatives (Energy and Commerce, and Transportation and Infrastructure). Legislative proposals are currently in various stages of committee development and the timing of further action is uncertain. Certain legislative proposals, if enacted into law, may increase costs for natural gas industry companies, including the Company and Columbia of Massachusetts.
SEC Investigation. On November 27, 2019, the SEC staff notified the Company that it concluded its investigation related to disclosures made by the Company prior to the Greater Lawrence Incident and, natural gas pipeline safety. Increased scrutiny related to these matters, including additional federal congressional hearings and new legislative proposals, is expected in 2019.
SEC Investigation. On February 11, 2019,based on the SEC notified the Company thatinformation provided as of such date, it is conducting an investigation of the Company related to disclosures made prior to the Greater Lawrence Incident. Wedoes not intend to cooperate withrecommend an enforcement action against the investigation.Company.
Private Actions.Various lawsuits, including several purported class action lawsuits, have been filed by various affected residents or businesses in Massachusetts state courts against the Company and/or Columbia of Massachusetts in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident. A special judge has been appointed to hear all pending and future cases and the class actions will behave been consolidated into one class action. On January 14, 2019, the special judge granted the parties’ joint motion to stay all cases for 90 daysuntil
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
April 30, 2019 to allow mediation. Themediation, and the parties are in the process of filing a request with the special judgesubsequently agreed to extend this period.the stay until July 25, 2019. The class action lawsuits allege varying causes of action, including those for strict liability for ultra-hazardous activity, negligence, private nuisance, public nuisance, premises liability, trespass, breach of warranty, breach of contract, failure to warn, unjust enrichment, consumer protection act claims, negligent, reckless and recklessintentional infliction of emotional distress and gross negligence, and seek actual compensatory damages, plus treble damages, and punitive damages.
On July 26, 2019, the Company, Columbia of Massachusetts and NiSource Corporate Services Company, a subsidiary of the Company, entered into a term sheet with the class action plaintiffs under which they agreed to settle the class action claims in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident. Columbia of Massachusetts agreed to pay $143 million into a settlement fund to compensate the settlement class and the settlement class agreed to release Columbia of Massachusetts and affiliates from all claims arising out of or related to the Greater Lawrence Incident. The following claims are not covered under the proposed settlement because they are not part of the consolidated class action: (1) physical bodily injury and wrongful death; (2) insurance subrogation, whether equitable, contractual or otherwise; and (3) claims arising out of appliances that are subject to the Massachusetts DPU orders. Emotional distress and similar claims are covered under the proposed settlement unless they are secondary to a physical bodily injury. The settlement class is defined under the term sheet as all persons and businesses in the three municipalities of Lawrence, Andover and North Andover, Massachusetts, subject to certain limited exceptions. The motion for preliminary approval and the settlement documents were filed on September 25, 2019. The preliminary approval court hearing was held on October 7, 2019 and the court issued an order granting preliminary approval of the settlement on October 11, 2019. The proposed settlement is subject to final court approval, and a hearing occurred on February 27, 2020. The court took the matter under advisement.
Many residents and business owners have submitted individual damage claims to Columbia of Massachusetts. We also have received notice from three parties indicating an intent to assertMost of the wrongful death and bodily injury claims that have been asserted have been settled, and we continue to discuss potential settlements with plaintiffs asserting such claims. In Massachusetts, punitive damages are available in a wrongful death action upon proof of gross negligence or willful or reckless conduct causing the death. In addition, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the municipalities of Lawrence, Andover and North Andover areis seeking reimbursement from Columbia of Massachusetts for their respectiveits expenses incurred in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident. The outcomes and impacts of thesuch private actions are uncertain at this time.
Financial Impact.During the year ended December 31, 2018, we expensed approximately $757 million for estimated third-party claims related to Since the Greater Lawrence Incident, including,we have recorded expenses of approximately $1,041 million for third-party claims and fines, penalties and settlements associated with government investigations. We estimate that total costs related to third-party claims and fines, penalties and settlements associated with government investigations resulting from the incident will range from $1,041 million to $1,065 million, depending on the number, nature, final outcome and value of third-party claims and the final outcome of government investigations. With regard to third-party claims, these costs include, but are not limited to, personal injury and property damage claims, damage to infrastructure, business interruption claims, and other damage claims, which include mutual aid payments to other utilities assisting with the restoration effort; gas-fueled appliance replacement, repair and related services for impacted customers; temporary lodging for displaced customers; evacuation expense claims; and claims-related legal fees. We estimate that totaleffort. These costs related to third-party claims resulting from the incident will range from $757 million to $790 million, depending on the final outcome of ongoing reviews and the number, nature, and value of third-party claims. The amounts set forth above do not include costs of certain third-party claims and fines, penalties or settlements associated with government investigations that we are not able to estimate, nor do they include non-claims related and government investigation-related legal expenses resulting from the incident orand the estimated capital cost of the pipeline replacement, which isare set forth in " - E. Other Matters - Greater Lawrence Incident Restoration" and " -"- Greater Lawrence Incident Pipeline Replacement," respectively, below.
The process for estimating costs associated with third-party claims and fines, penalties, and settlements associated with government investigations relating to the Greater Lawrence Incident requires management to exercise significant judgment based on a number of assumptions and subjective factors. As more information becomes known, including additional information resulting from the NTSB investigation,regarding ongoing investigations, management’s estimates and assumptions regarding the financial impact of the Greater Lawrence Incident may change.
The increase in estimated total costs related to third-party claims from those disclosed in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 resulted primarily from receiving additional information regarding the required scope of the restoration work inside the affected homes and the extended period of time over which the restoration work would take place.
It is not possible at this time to reasonably estimate the totalaggregate amount of any expenses associated with government investigations and fines, penalties or settlements with governmental authorities, including the Massachusetts DPU and other regulators, that we may incur in connection withthird-party liability insurance coverage available for losses arising from the Greater Lawrence Incident. Therefore,Incident is $800 million. We have collected the foregoing amounts do not include estimates of the total amount that we may incur for any such fines, penalties or settlements.
Expenses described above are presented within “Operation and maintenance” in our Statements of Consolidated Income.
We maintain liability insurance for damages in the approximate amount ofentire $800 million and property insurance for gas pipelines and other applicable property in the approximate amountas of $300 million.December 31, 2019. Total expenses related to the incident have exceeded the total amount of liability insurance coverage available under our policies. CertainRefer to "- E. Other Matters - Greater Lawrence Incident Restoration," below for a summary of these expenses may be covered under our property insurance. While we believe that a substantial amount of expenses related tothird-party claims-related expense activity and associated insurance recoveries recorded since the Greater Lawrence Incident will be covered by insurance, insurers providing property and liability insurance to the Company or Columbia of Massachusetts may raise defenses to coverage under the terms and conditions of the respective insurance policies which contain various exclusions and conditions that could limit the amount of insurance proceeds to the Company or Columbia of Massachusetts. Incident.
We are not able to
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
estimate the amount of expenses that will not be covered or exceed insurance limits, but these amounts could be material to our financial statements. Certain types of damages, expenses or claimed costs, such as fines or penalties, may be excluded under the policies. An amount of $135 million for insurance recoveries was recorded through December 31, 2018. Of this amount, $5 million was collected during 2018. The remaining insurance receivable balance of $130 million is presented within “Accounts receivable.” To the extent that we are not successful in obtaining insurance recoveries in the amount recorded for such recoveries as of December 31, 2018, it could result in a charge against "Operation and maintenance" expense. We are currently unable to predict the amount and timing of additional future insurance recoveries.
In addition, we arealso party to certain other claims, regulatory and legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business in each state in which we have operations, none of which is deemed to be individually material at this time.
Due to the inherent uncertainty of litigation, there can be no assurance that the resolution of any particular claim, proceeding or proceedinginvestigation related to the Greater Lawrence Incident or otherwise would not have a material adverse effect on our results of
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
operations, financial position or liquidity. Certain matters in connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident have had or may have a material impact as described above. If one or more of such additional or other matters were decided against us, the effects could be material to our results of operations in the period in which we would be required to record or adjust the related liability and could also be material to our cash flows in the periods that we would be required to pay such liability.
D. Environmental Matters.Our operations are subject to environmental statutes and regulations related to air quality, water quality, hazardous waste and solid waste. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with the environmental regulations currently applicable to our operations.
It is management's continued intent to address environmental issues in cooperation with regulatory authorities in such a manner as to achieve mutually acceptable compliance plans. However, there can be no assurance that fines and penalties will not be incurred. Management expects a significant portion of environmental assessment, improvement and remediation costs to be recoverable through rates for certain of our companies.
As of December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, we had recorded a liability of $101.2$104.4 million and $111.4$101.2 million, respectively, to cover environmental remediation at various sites. The current portion of this liability is included in "Legal and environmental" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The noncurrent portion is included in "Other noncurrent liabilities." We recognize costs associated with environmental remediation obligations when the incurrence of such costs is probable and the amounts can be reasonably estimated. The original estimates for remediation activities may differ materially from the amount ultimately expended. The actual future expenditures depend on many factors, including currently enacted laws and regulations, the nature and extent of impact and the method of remediation. These expenditures are not currently estimable at some sites. We periodically adjust our liability as information is collected and estimates become more refined.
Electric Operations' compliance estimates disclosed below are reflective of NIPSCO's Integrated Resource Plan submitted to the IURC on October 31, 2018. See section " - E. Other Matters - NIPSCO 2018 Integrated Resource Plan," below for additional information.
Air
Future legislative and regulatory programs could significantly limit allowed GHG emissions or impose a cost or tax on GHG emissions. Additionally, rules that increase methane leak detection, require emissionfurther GHG reductions or impose additional requirements for natural gas facilities could restrict GHG emissions and impose additional costs. NiSource will carefully monitor all GHG reduction proposals and regulations.
CPP and ACE Rules.Rule. On October 23, 2015, the EPA issued the CPP to regulate CO2 emissions from existing fossil-fuel EGUs under section 111(d) of the CAA. The U.S. Supreme Court has stayed implementation of the CPP until litigation is decided on its merits, and the EPA has proposed to repeal the CPP. On August 31, 2018,July 8, 2019, the EPA published a proposal to replace the CPP with thefinal ACE rule, which establishes emission guidelines for states to use when developing plans to reduce CO2 emissions from existinglimit carbon dioxide at coal-fired EGUs.electric generating units based on heat rate improvement measures. The proposal would providecoal-fired units at NIPSCO’s R.M. Schahfer Generating Station and Michigan City Generating Station are potentially affected sources, and compliance requirements for these units which NIPSCO plans to retire by 2023 and 2028, respectively, will be determined by future Indiana rulemaking. The ACE rule notes that states three years afterhave “broad flexibility in setting standards of performance for designated facilities” and that a final rulestate may set a “business as usual” standard for sources that have a remaining useful life “so short that imposing any costs on the electric generating unit is issued to develop state-specificunreasonable.” State plans are due by 2022, and the EPA wouldwill have twelvesix months to act ondetermine completeness and then one additional year to determine whether to approve the submitted plan. States have the discretion to determine the compliance period for each source. As a complete state plan submittal. Within two years after a finding of failure to submit a complete plan, or disapproval of a state plan, the EPA would issue a federal plan.result, NIPSCO will continue to monitor this matter and cannot estimate its impact at this time.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
Waste
CERCLA. Our subsidiaries are potentially responsible parties at waste disposal sites under the CERCLA (commonly known as Superfund) and similar state laws. Under CERCLA, each potentially responsible party can be held jointly, severally and strictly liable for the remediation costs as the EPA, or state, can allow the parties to pay for remedial action or perform remedial action themselves and request reimbursement from the potentially responsible parties. Our affiliates have retained CERCLA environmental liabilities, including remediation liabilities, associated with certain current and former operations. These liabilities are not material to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MGP. A program has been instituted to identify and investigate former MGP sites where Gas Distribution Operations subsidiaries or predecessors may have liability. The program has identified 63 such sites where liability is probable. Remedial actions at many of these sites are being overseen by state or federal environmental agencies through consent agreements or voluntary remediation agreements.
We utilize a probabilistic model to estimate our future remediation costs related to MGP sites. The model was prepared with the assistance of a third party and incorporates our experience and general industry experience with remediating MGP sites. We
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
complete an annual refresh of the model in the second quarter of each fiscal year. No material changes to the estimated future remediation costs were noted as a result of the refresh completed as of June 30, 2018.2019. Our total estimated liability related to the facilities subject to remediation was $97.5$102.2 million and $106.9$97.5 million at December 31, 20182019 and 2017,2018, respectively. The liability represents our best estimate of the probable cost to remediate the facilities. We believe that it is reasonably possible that remediation costs could vary by as much as $20 million in addition to the costs noted above. Remediation costs are estimated based on the best available information, applicable remediation standards at the balance sheet date, and experience with similar facilities.
CCRs. On April 17, 2015, the EPA issued a final rule for regulation of CCRs. The rule regulates CCRs under the RCRA Subtitle D, which determines them to be nonhazardous. The rule is implemented in phases and requires increased groundwater monitoring, reporting, recordkeeping and posting of related information to the Internet. The rule also establishes requirements related to CCR management and disposal. The rule will allow NIPSCO to continue its byproduct beneficial use program.
To comply with the rule, NIPSCO completed capital expenditures to modify its infrastructure and manage CCRs during 2019. The publication of the CCR rule also resulted in revisions to previously recorded legal obligations associated with the retirement of certain NIPSCO facilities. The actual asset retirement costs related to the CCR rule may vary substantially from the estimates used to record the increased asset retirement obligation due to the uncertainty about the requirements that will be established by environmental authorities, compliance strategies that will be used and the preliminary nature of available data used to estimate costs. In addition, to comply with the rule, NIPSCO is incurring capital expenditures to modify its infrastructure and manage CCRs. Capital compliance costs are currently expected to total approximately $193 million. As allowed by the EPA,rule, NIPSCO will continue to collect data over time to determine the specific compliance solutions and associated costs and, as a result, the actual costs may vary.
NIPSCO has filed a petition on November 1, 2016initial CCR closure plans for R.M. Schahfer Generating Station and Michigan City Generating Station with the IURC seeking approvalIndiana Department of the projects and recovery of the costs associated with CCR compliance. On June 9, 2017, NIPSCO filed with the IURC a settlement reached with certain parties regarding the CCR projects and treatment of associated costs. The IURC approved the settlement in an order on December 13, 2017.Environmental Management.
Water
ELG. On November 3, 2015, the EPA issued a final rule to amend the ELG and standards for the Steam Electric Power Generating category. The final rule became effective January 4, 2016. Based upon a preliminary study performed in 2016 of the November 3, 2015 final rule, capital compliance costs were expected to be approximately $170.0 million. However,The EPA has proposed revisions to the final rule, and public comments were due on January 21, 2020. NIPSCO does not anticipate material ELG compliance costs based on the preferred option announced as part of NIPSCO's 2018 Integrated Resource Plan (discussed below).
E. Other Matters.
Bailly Generating Station.On February 1, 2018, as previously approved by MISO, NIPSCO commenced a four-month outage of Bailly Generating Station Unit 8 in order to begin work on converting the unit to a synchronous condenser (a piece of equipment designed to maintain voltage to ensure continued reliability on the transmission system). Approximately $15 million of net book value of Unit 8 remained in “Net Utility Plant” as it will remain used and useful after completion of the synchronous condenser, while the remaining net book value of approximately $142 million was reclassified to “Regulatory assets (noncurrent)” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. On May 31, 2018, Units 7 and 8 were retired from service. These units had a combined generating capacity of approximately 460 MW. As a result of the retirement, the remaining net book value of Unit 7 of approximately $103 million was reclassified to “Regulatory assets (noncurrent)” on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.These amounts continue to be amortized at a rate consistent with their inclusion in customer rates. Refer to Note 8, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NIPSCO Pure Air. NIPSCO had a service agreement with Pure Air, a general partnership between Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and First Air Partners LP, under which Pure Air provided scrubber services to reduce sulfur dioxide emissions for Units 7 and 8 at the Bailly Generating Station. Payments under this agreement were $8.3 million and $22.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
As discussed above in "Bailly Generating Station," NIPSCO retired the generation station units serviced by Pure Air on May 31, 2018. In December 2016, as allowed by the provisions of the service agreement, NIPSCO provided Pure Air formal notice of intent to terminate the service agreement, effective May 31, 2018. Providing this notice to Pure Air triggered a contract termination liability of $16 million which was recorded in fourth quarter of 2016. In connection with the closure of Bailly Units 7 and 8, NIPSCO paid the termination payment to Pure Air during the second quarter of 2018. Cash flows associated with this payment are presented within operating activities on the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows.
NIPSCO 2018 Integrated Resource Plan.Multiple factors, but primarily economic ones, including low natural gas prices, advancing cost effective renewable technology and increasing capital and operating costs associated with existing coal plants, have led NIPSCO to conclude in its October 2018 Integrated Resource Plan submission that NIPSCO’s current fleet of coal generation facilities will be retired earlier than previous Integrated Resource Plan’sPlans had indicated.
The Integrated Resource Plan evaluated demand-side and supply-side resource alternatives to reliably and cost effectively meet NIPSCO customers' future energy requirements over the ensuing 20 years. The preferred option within the Integrated Resource Plan retires R.M. Schahfer Generating Station (Units 14, 15, 17, and 18) by 2023 and Michigan City Generating Station (Unit 12) by 2028. These units represent 2,080 MW of generating capacity, equal to 72% of NIPSCO’s remaining generating capacity (and 100% of NIPSCO's remaining coal-fired generating capacity) after the retirement of Bailly Units 7 and 8 discussed above.on May 31, 2018.
The current replacement plan includes renewable sources of energy, including wind, solar, and battery storage to be obtained through a combination of NIPSCO ownership and PPAs.
In January 2019, NIPSCO executed two 20 year PPAs to purchase 100% of the output from renewable generation facilities at a fixed price per MWh. The facilities supplying the energy will have a combined nameplate capacity of approximately 700 MW. NIPSCO's purchase requirement under the PPAs is dependent on satisfactory approval of the PPAs by the IURC. NIPSCO submitted the PPAs to the IURC for approval in February 2019. An IURC order is anticipated in the second quarter of 2019. If approved by2019 and the IURC paymentsapproved the PPAs on June 5, 2019. Payments under the PPAs will not begin until the associated generation facilities are constructed by the owner / seller which is expectedcurrently scheduled to be complete by the end of 2020.2020 for one facility. NIPSCO has filed a notice with the IURC of its intention not to move forward with one of its approved PPAs due to the failure to meet a condition precedent in the agreement as a result of local zoning restrictions.
Also in January 2019, NIPSCO executed a BTA with a developer to construct a renewable generation facility with a nameplate capacity of approximately 100 MW. Once complete, ownership of the facility would be transferred to a partnershipjoint venture owned by NIPSCO, the developer and an unrelated tax equity partner. The aforementioned partnership structure will result in fulljoint venture is expected to be fully owned by NIPSCO ownership after the PTC are monetized from the project (approximately 10 years after the facility goes into service). NIPSCO's purchase requirement under the BTA is dependent on satisfactory approval of the BTA by the IURC, successful execution of an agreement with a tax equity partner, and timely completion of construction. The estimated procedural timelineNIPSCO submitted the BTA to the IURC for receiving anapproval
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
in February 2019 and the IURC order isapproved the same as the aforementioned PPAs with requiredBTA on August 7, 2019. Required FERC filings occurringoccurred after receiving the IURC order.order and the related approvals were received. Construction of the facility is expected to be completecompleted by the end of 2020.
On October 1, 2019, NIPSCO announced the opening of its next round of RFP to consider potential resources to meet the future electric needs of its customers. The RFP closed on November 20, 2019, and NIPSCO continues to evaluate the results. NIPSCO is considering all sources in the RFP process.
In October 2019, NIPSCO executed a BTA with a developer to construct an additional renewable generation facility with a nameplate capacity of approximately 300 MW. Once complete, ownership of the facility would be transferred to a joint venture owned by NIPSCO, the developer and an unrelated tax equity partner. The aforementioned joint venture is expected to be fully owned by NIPSCO after the PTC are monetized from the project (approximately 10 years after the facility goes into service). NIPSCO's purchase requirement under the BTA is dependent on satisfactory approval of the BTA by the IURC, successful execution of an agreement with a tax equity partner, and timely completion of construction. NIPSCO submitted the BTA to the IURC for approval on October 22, 2019, and the IURC approved the BTA on February 19, 2020. Required FERC filings are expected to be filed by the end of June 2020. Construction of the facility is expected to be completed by the end of 2021.
Greater Lawrence Incident Restoration. DuringIn addition to the year ended December 31, 2018, we expensed approximately $1,023 million in connectionamounts estimated for third-party claims and fines, penalties and settlements associated with government investigations described above, since the Greater Lawrence Incident. Included in this expense isIncident, we have recorded expenses of approximately $757$420 million for estimated third-party claimsother incident-related costs. We estimate that total other incident-related costs will range from $450 million to $460 million, depending on the incurrence of costs associated with the incident as describedresolving outstanding inquiries and investigations discuss above in " - C. Legal Proceedings." The additional $266 million included in the expense recorded includesSuch costs include certain consulting costs, legal costs, vendor costs, claims center costs, charitable contributions, labor and related expenses lodging and meals for employees and contractors, and security costsincurred in connection with the incident. We expect to incur a total of $330 million to $345 million in such incident-related costs, depending on the incurrence of future restoration work.incident, and insurance-related loss surcharges. The amounts set forth above do not include the estimated capital cost of the pipeline replacement, which is set forth below. The increase in estimated total incident-related expenses from those disclosed in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 resulted primarily from receiving additional information regarding the extended period of time over which the restoration work would take place, higher than anticipated costs from vendors and increasedbelow, or any estimates for non-claims-related legal fees.fines and penalties, which are discussed above in " - C. Legal Proceedings."
We maintainAs discussed in "- C. Legal Proceedings," the aggregate amount of third-party liability insurance coverage available for damages inlosses arising from the approximate amount ofGreater Lawrence Incident is $800 million. We have collected the entire $800 million and property insurance for gas pipelines and other applicable property in the approximate amountas of $300 million. Total expensesDecember 31, 2019. Expenses related to the incident have exceeded the total amount of liability insurance coverage available under our policies. Certain of these
The following table summarizes expenses may be covered under our property insurance. While we believe that a substantial amount of expenses related toincurred and insurance recoveries recorded since the Greater Lawrence Incident will be covered by insurance, insurers providing propertyIncident. This activity is presented within "Operation and liability insurance to the Company or Columbiamaintenance" and "Other, net" in our Statements of Massachusetts may raise
Consolidated Income (Loss).
107 |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended | | Year Ended | |
| (in millions) | December 31, 2018 | | December 31, 2019 | Incident to Date |
| Third-party claims and government fines, penalties and settlements | $ | 757 |
| | $ | 284 |
| $ | 1,041 |
|
| Other incident-related costs | 266 |
| | 154 |
| 420 |
|
| Total | 1,023 |
| | 438 |
| 1,461 |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded | (135 | ) | | (665 | ) | (800 | ) |
| Loss (benefit) to income before income taxes | $ | 888 |
| | $ | (227 | ) | $ | 661 |
|
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
defenses to coverage under the terms and conditions of the respective insurance policies which contain various exclusions and conditions that could limit the amount of insurance proceeds to the Company or Columbia of Massachusetts. We are not able to estimate the amount of expenses that will not be covered or exceed insurance limits, but these amounts could be materialThe following table presents activity related to our financial statements. Certain typesGreater Lawrence Incident insurance recovery, which we have recovered in full as of damages, expenses or claimed costs, such as fines or penalties, may be excluded under the policies. As discussed above in “- C. Legal Proceedings,” $135December 31, 2019.
|
| | | |
| (in millions) | Insurance receivable(1) |
| Balance, December 31, 2018 | $ | 130 |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded in first quarter of 2019 | 100 |
|
| Cash collected from insurance recoveries in the first quarter of 2019 | (108 | ) |
| Balance, March 31, 2019 | 122 |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded in the second quarter of 2019 | 435 |
|
| Cash collected from insurance recoveries in the second quarter of 2019 | (297 | ) |
| Balance, June 30, 2019 | $ | 260 |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded in third quarter of 2019 | — |
|
| Cash collected from insurance recoveries in the third quarter of 2019 | (260 | ) |
| Balance, September 30, 2019 | $ | — |
|
| Insurance recoveries recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 | 130 |
|
| Cash collected from insurance recoveries in the fourth quarter of 2019 | (130 | ) |
| Balance, December 31, 2019 | $ | — |
|
(1)$5 million of insurance recoveries were recorded through December 31, 2018. Of this amount, $5 million was collected during 2018. We are currently unable to predict the amount and timing of future insurance recoveries. To the extent that we are not successful in obtaining insurance recoveries in the amount recorded for such recoveries as of December 31, 2018, it could result in a charge against "Operation and maintenance" expense.
Costs associated with charitable contributions are presented within “Other, Net” in our Statements of Consolidated Income. All other expenses incurred are presented within “Operation and maintenance.” Substantially all of the $292 million liability for third-party claims and other incident-related costs remaining as of December 31, 2018 is presented within current liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining insurance receivable balance of $130 million is presented within “Accounts receivable.”
Greater Lawrence Pipeline Replacement. In connection with the Greater Lawrence Incident, Columbia of Massachusetts, in cooperation with the Massachusetts Governor’s Office,office, replaced the entire affected 45-mile cast iron and bare steel pipeline system that delivers gas to approximately 7,500 gas meters, the majority of which serve residences and approximately 700 of which approximately 700 serve businesses impacted in the Greater Lawrence Incident. This system was replaced with plastic distribution mains and service lines, as well as enhanced safety features such as pressure regulation and excess flow valves at each premise. At the request of the Massachusetts DPU, which was instructed by the Massachusetts Governor through his executive authority under a state of emergency, Columbia of Massachusetts hired an outside contractor to serve as the Chief Recovery Officer for
Since the Greater Lawrence Incident responsible for command, control and communications. Columbia of Massachusetts restored gas service to nearly all homes and workplaces inthrough December 2018. With the restoration and recovery efforts now substantially complete, the service of the Chief Recovery Officer is complete and the next phase of the effort is being managed by Columbia of Massachusetts under the third party oversight of a Massachusetts-based engineering firm as set forth above under “ - C. Legal Proceedings.”
We incurred31, 2019, we have invested approximately $167$258 million of capital spend for the pipeline replacement during 2018.replacement; this work was completed in 2019. We estimate this replacement work will cost between $220 millionmaintain property insurance for gas pipelines and $230 million in total.other applicable property. Columbia of Massachusetts has provided notice tofiled a proof of loss with its property insurer for the full cost of the Greater Lawrence Incident and discussions aroundpipeline replacement. In January 2020, we filed a lawsuit against the claim andproperty insurer, seeking payment of our property claim. We are currently unable to predict the timing or amount of any insurance recovery have commenced.under the property policy. The recovery of any capital investment not reimbursed through insurance will be addressed in a future regulatory proceeding.proceeding; a future regulatory proceeding is dependent on the outcome of the sale of the Massachusetts Business. The outcome of such a proceeding (if any) is uncertain. In accordance with ASC 980-360, if it becomes probable that a portion of the pipeline replacement cost will not be recoverable through customer rates and an amount can be reasonably estimated, we will reduce our regulated plant balance for the amount of the probable disallowance and record an associated charge to earnings. This could result in a material adverse effect to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Additionally, if a rate order is received allowing recovery of the investment with no or reduced return on investment, a loss on disallowance may be required.
In addition, we have committedState Income Taxes Related to an approximately $150 million capital investment program to install over-pressurization protection devices on allGreater Lawrence Incident Expenses. As of our low-pressure systems as described above in “-C. Legal Proceedings.” These devices operate like circuit-breakers, so that if operating pressure is too high or too low, regardless of the cause, they are designed to immediately shut down gasDecember 31, 2018, expenses related to the system.Greater Lawrence Incident were $1,023 million. In the fourth quarter of 2019, we filed an application for Alternative Apportionment with the MA DOR to request an allocable approach to these expenses for purposes of Massachusetts state income taxes, which, if approved, would result in a state deferred tax asset of approximately $50 million, net. The program also includes installing remote monitoring devices on all low-pressure systems, enabling gas control centersMA DOR is expected to continuously monitor pressure at regulator stations in real time. In addition, we have conducted a field surveyreview the application within nine months from the date of all regulator stations and initiated an engineering review of those regulator stations; we are verifying and enhancing our maps and records of low-pressure regulator stations;filing, and we initiated a process sobelieve it is reasonably possible that our personnelthe application will be present whenever excavation work is being done in close proximity to a regulator station.accepted, or an alternative method proposed.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
19.20. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table displays the activity of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax:
| | | (in millions) | Gains and Losses on Securities(1) | | Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges(1) | | Pension and OPEB Items(1) | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(1) | Gains and Losses on Securities(1) | | Gains and Losses on Cash Flow Hedges(1) | | Pension and OPEB Items(1) | | Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss(1) |
| Balance as of January 1, 2016 | $ | (0.5 | ) | | $ | (15.5 | ) | | $ | (19.1 | ) | | $ | (35.1 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications | — |
| | 7.1 |
| | 0.5 |
| | 7.6 |
| |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | (0.1 | ) | | 1.5 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 2.4 |
| |
| Net current-period other comprehensive loss | (0.1 | ) | | 8.6 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 10.0 |
| |
| Balance as of December 31, 2016 | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | (6.9 | ) | | $ | (17.6 | ) | | $ | (25.1 | ) | |
| Other comprehensive income before reclassifications | 0.6 |
| | (24.2 | ) | | 1.9 |
| | (21.7 | ) | |
| Balance as of January 1, 2017 | | $ | (0.6 | ) | | $ | (6.9 | ) | | $ | (17.6 | ) | | $ | (25.1 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | | 0.6 |
| | (24.2 | ) | | 1.9 |
| | (21.7 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | 0.2 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 3.4 |
| 0.2 |
| | 1.7 |
| | 1.5 |
| | 3.4 |
|
| Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) | 0.8 |
| | (22.5 | ) | | 3.4 |
| | (18.3 | ) | 0.8 |
| | (22.5 | ) | | 3.4 |
| | (18.3 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2017 | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | (29.4 | ) | | $ | (14.2 | ) | | $ | (43.4 | ) | $ | 0.2 |
| | $ | (29.4 | ) | | $ | (14.2 | ) | | $ | (43.4 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | (3.0 | ) | | 55.8 |
| | (4.4 | ) | | 48.4 |
| (3.0 | ) | | 55.8 |
| | (4.4 | ) | | 48.4 |
|
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | 0.4 |
| | (33.1 | ) | | — |
| | (32.7 | ) | 0.4 |
| | (33.1 | ) | | — |
| | (32.7 | ) |
| Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) | (2.6 | ) | | 22.7 |
| | (4.4 | ) | | 15.7 |
| (2.6 | ) | | 22.7 |
| | (4.4 | ) | | 15.7 |
|
| Reclassification due to adoption of ASU 2018-02 (Refer to Note 2) | — |
| | (6.3 | ) | | (3.2 | ) | | (9.5 | ) | |
| Reclassification due to adoption of ASU 2018-02 | | — |
| | (6.3 | ) | | (3.2 | ) | | (9.5 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2018 | $ | (2.4 | ) | | $ | (13.0 | ) | | $ | (21.8 | ) | | $ | (37.2 | ) | $ | (2.4 | ) | | $ | (13.0 | ) | | $ | (21.8 | ) | | $ | (37.2 | ) |
| Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications | | 6.1 |
| | (64.3 | ) | | 2.3 |
| | (55.9 | ) |
| Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss | | (0.4 | ) | | 0.1 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 0.5 |
|
| Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss) | | 5.7 |
| | (64.2 | ) | | 3.1 |
| | (55.4 | ) |
| Balance as of December 31, 2019 | | $ | 3.3 |
| | $ | (77.2 | ) | | $ | (18.7 | ) | | $ | (92.6 | ) |
(1)All amounts are net of tax. Amounts in parentheses indicate debits.
21. Other, Net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Interest income | $ | 7.7 |
| | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 4.6 |
|
| AFUDC equity | 8.0 |
| | 14.2 |
| | 12.6 |
|
Charitable contributions(1) | (5.1 | ) | | (45.3 | ) | | (19.9 | ) |
Pension and other postretirement non-service cost(2) | (16.5 | ) | | 18.0 |
| | (10.6 | ) |
Interest rate swap settlement gain(3) | — |
| | 46.2 |
| | — |
|
| Miscellaneous | 0.7 |
| | 3.8 |
| | (0.2 | ) |
| Total Other, net | $ | (5.2 | ) | | $ | 43.5 |
| | $ | (13.5 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Interest Income | $ | 6.6 |
| | $ | 4.6 |
| | $ | 3.4 |
|
| AFUDC Equity | 14.2 |
| | 12.6 |
| | 11.6 |
|
Charitable Contributions(1) | (45.3 | ) | | (19.9 | ) | | (4.5 | ) |
Pension and other postretirement non-service cost(2) | 18.0 |
| | (10.6 | ) | | (7.9 | ) |
Interest rate swap settlement gain(3) | 46.2 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Miscellaneous | 3.8 |
| | (0.2 | ) | | (5.6 | ) |
| Total Other, net | $ | 43.5 |
| | $ | (13.5 | ) | | $ | (3.0 | ) |
(1) Includes2018 charitable contributions include $20.7 million related to the Greater Lawrence Incident.Incident and $20.0 million of discretionary contributions made to the Nisource Charitable Foundation. See Note 18,19, "Other Commitments and Contingencies" for additional information.information on the Greater Lawrence Incident.
(2) See Note 11, "Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits" for additional information.
(3) See Note 9, "Risk Management Activities" for additional information.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
22. Interest Expense, Net
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Interest on long-term debt | $ | 327.7 |
| | $ | 342.2 |
| | $ | 354.8 |
|
| Interest on short-term borrowings | 50.8 |
| | 31.8 |
| | 14.9 |
|
| Debt discount/cost amortization | 8.3 |
| | 7.7 |
| | 7.2 |
|
| Accounts receivable securitization fees | 2.6 |
| | 2.6 |
| | 2.5 |
|
| Allowance for borrowed funds used and interest capitalized during construction | (7.5 | ) | | (9.1 | ) | | (6.2 | ) |
| Debt-based post-in-service carrying charges | (18.7 | ) | | (35.0 | ) | | (36.4 | ) |
| Other | 15.7 |
| | 13.1 |
| | 16.4 |
|
| Total Interest Expense, net | $ | 378.9 |
| | $ | 353.3 |
| | $ | 353.2 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Interest on long-term debt | $ | 342.2 |
| | $ | 354.8 |
| | $ | 352.3 |
|
| Interest on short-term borrowings | 31.8 |
| | 14.9 |
| | 9.2 |
|
| Debt discount/cost amortization | 7.7 |
| | 7.2 |
| | 7.6 |
|
| Accounts receivable securitization fees | 2.6 |
| | 2.5 |
| | 2.3 |
|
| Allowance for borrowed funds used and interest capitalized during construction | (9.1 | ) | | (6.2 | ) | | (5.6 | ) |
| Debt-based post-in-service carrying charges | (35.0 | ) | | (36.4 | ) | | (35.1 | ) |
| Other | 13.1 |
| | 16.4 |
| | 18.8 |
|
| Total Interest Expense, net | $ | 353.3 |
| | $ | 353.2 |
| | $ | 349.5 |
|
23. Segments of Business
At December 31, 2018,2019, our operations are divided into two2 primary reportable segments. The Gas Distribution Operations segment provides natural gas service and transportation for residential, commercial and industrial customers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Kentucky, Maryland, Indiana and Massachusetts. The Electric Operations segment provides electric service in 20 counties in the northern part of Indiana.
The following table provides information about our reportable segments. We use operating income as our primary measurement for each of the reported segments and make decisions on finance, dividends and taxes at the corporate level on a consolidated basis. Segment revenues include intersegment sales to affiliated subsidiaries, which are eliminated in consolidation. Affiliated sales are recognized on the basis of prevailing market, regulated prices or at levels provided for under contractual agreements. Operating income is derived from revenues and expenses directly associated with each segment.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Operating Revenues | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | | | | | |
| Unaffiliated | $ | 3,509.7 |
| | $ | 3,406.4 |
| | $ | 3,087.9 |
|
| Intersegment | 13.1 |
| | 13.1 |
| | 14.2 |
|
| Total | 3,522.8 |
| | 3,419.5 |
| | 3,102.1 |
|
| Electric Operations | | | | | |
| Unaffiliated | 1,698.4 |
| | 1,707.4 |
| | 1,785.7 |
|
| Intersegment | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| Total | 1,699.2 |
| | 1,708.2 |
| | 1,786.5 |
|
| Corporate and Other | | | | | |
| Unaffiliated | 0.8 |
| | 0.7 |
| | 1.0 |
|
| Intersegment | 468.1 |
| | 517.6 |
| | 510.8 |
|
| Total | 468.9 |
| | 518.3 |
| | 511.8 |
|
| Eliminations | (482.0 | ) | | (531.5 | ) | | (525.8 | ) |
| Consolidated Operating Revenues | $ | 5,208.9 |
| | $ | 5,114.5 |
| | $ | 4,874.6 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Operating Revenues | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | | | | | |
| Unaffiliated | $ | 3,406.4 |
| | $ | 3,087.9 |
| | $ | 2,818.2 |
|
| Intersegment | 13.1 |
| | 14.2 |
| | 12.4 |
|
| Total | 3,419.5 |
| | 3,102.1 |
| | 2,830.6 |
|
| Electric Operations | | | | | |
| Unaffiliated | 1,707.4 |
| | 1,785.7 |
| | 1,660.8 |
|
| Intersegment | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
| | 0.8 |
|
| Total | 1,708.2 |
| | 1,786.5 |
| | 1,661.6 |
|
| Corporate and Other | | | | | |
| Unaffiliated | 0.7 |
| | 1.0 |
| | 13.5 |
|
| Intersegment | 517.6 |
| | 510.8 |
| | 413.3 |
|
| Total | 518.3 |
| | 511.8 |
| | 426.8 |
|
| Eliminations | (531.5 | ) | | (525.8 | ) | | (426.5 | ) |
| Consolidated Operating Revenues | $ | 5,114.5 |
| | $ | 4,874.6 |
| | $ | 4,492.5 |
|
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Operating Income (Loss) | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | 675.4 |
| | $ | (254.1 | ) | | $ | 550.1 |
|
| Electric Operations | 406.8 |
| | 386.1 |
| | 367.4 |
|
Corporate and Other(2) | (191.5 | ) | | (7.3 | ) | | 3.7 |
|
| Consolidated Operating Income | $ | 890.7 |
| | $ | 124.7 |
| | $ | 921.2 |
|
| Depreciation and Amortization | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | 403.2 |
| | $ | 301.0 |
| | $ | 269.3 |
|
| Electric Operations | 277.3 |
| | 262.9 |
| | 277.8 |
|
| Corporate and Other | 36.9 |
| | 35.7 |
| | 23.2 |
|
| Consolidated Depreciation and Amortization | $ | 717.4 |
| | $ | 599.6 |
| | $ | 570.3 |
|
| Assets | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | 14,224.5 |
| | $ | 13,527.0 |
| | $ | 12,048.8 |
|
| Electric Operations | 6,027.6 |
| | 5,735.2 |
| | 5,478.6 |
|
| Corporate and Other | 2,407.7 |
| | 2,541.8 |
| | 2,434.3 |
|
| Consolidated Assets | $ | 22,659.8 |
| | $ | 21,804.0 |
| | $ | 19,961.7 |
|
Capital Expenditures(1) | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | 1,380.3 |
| | $ | 1,315.3 |
| | $ | 1,125.6 |
|
| Electric Operations | 468.9 |
| | 499.3 |
| | 592.4 |
|
| Corporate and Other | 18.6 |
| | — |
| | 35.8 |
|
| Consolidated Capital Expenditures | $ | 1,867.8 |
|
| $ | 1,814.6 |
| | $ | 1,753.8 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Operating Income (Loss) | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | (254.1 | ) | | $ | 550.1 |
| | $ | 569.7 |
|
| Electric Operations | 386.1 |
| | 367.4 |
| | 301.3 |
|
| Corporate and Other | (7.3 | ) | | 3.7 |
| | (4.9 | ) |
| Consolidated Operating Income | $ | 124.7 |
| | $ | 921.2 |
| | $ | 866.1 |
|
| Depreciation and Amortization | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | 301.0 |
| | $ | 269.3 |
| | $ | 252.9 |
|
| Electric Operations | 262.9 |
| | 277.8 |
| | 274.5 |
|
| Corporate and Other | 35.7 |
| | 23.2 |
| | 19.7 |
|
| Consolidated Depreciation and Amortization | $ | 599.6 |
| | $ | 570.3 |
| | $ | 547.1 |
|
| Assets | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | 13,527.0 |
| | $ | 12,048.8 |
| | $ | 11,096.4 |
|
| Electric Operations | 5,735.2 |
| | 5,478.6 |
| | 5,233.3 |
|
| Corporate and Other | 2,541.8 |
| | 2,434.3 |
| | 2,362.2 |
|
| Consolidated Assets | $ | 21,804.0 |
| | $ | 19,961.7 |
| | $ | 18,691.9 |
|
Capital Expenditures(1) | | | | | |
| Gas Distribution Operations | $ | 1,315.3 |
| | $ | 1,125.6 |
| | $ | 1,054.4 |
|
| Electric Operations | 499.3 |
| | 592.4 |
| | 420.6 |
|
| Corporate and Other | — |
| | 35.8 |
| | 15.4 |
|
| Consolidated Capital Expenditures | $ | 1,814.6 |
|
| $ | 1,753.8 |
| | $ | 1,490.4 |
|
(1(1)Amounts differ from those presented on the Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows primarily due to the inclusion of capital expenditures included in current liabilities and AFUDC Equity.
(2) In 2019, Corporate and Other reflects an impairment charge of $204.8 million for goodwill related to Columbia of Massachusetts. For additional information, see Note 6, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
| |
23. | Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited) |
24. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
Quarterly financial data does not always reveal the trend of our business operations due to nonrecurring items and seasonal weather patterns, which affect earnings and related components of revenue and operating income.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except per share data) | First Quarter(1) | | Second Quarter(2) | | Third Quarter(3) | | Fourth Quarter(4) |
| 2019 | | | | | | | |
| Operating Revenues | $ | 1,869.8 |
| | $ | 1,010.4 |
| | $ | 931.5 |
| | $ | 1,397.2 |
|
| Operating Income (Loss) | 374.2 |
| | 463.5 |
| | 91.0 |
| | (38.0 | ) |
| Net Income (Loss) | 218.9 |
| | 296.9 |
| | 6.6 |
| | (139.3 | ) |
| Preferred Dividends | (13.8 | ) | | (13.8 | ) | | (13.8 | ) | | (13.7 | ) |
| Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders | 205.1 |
| | 283.1 |
| | (7.2 | ) | | (153.0 | ) |
| Earnings (Loss) Per Share | | | | | | | |
| Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | 0.76 |
| | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.41 | ) |
| Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | 0.75 |
| | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | (0.41 | ) |
| 2018 | | | | | | | |
| Operating Revenues | $ | 1,750.8 |
| | $ | 1,007.0 |
| | $ | 895.0 |
| | $ | 1,461.7 |
|
| Operating Income (Loss) | 400.6 |
| | 118.4 |
| | (315.9 | ) | | (78.4 | ) |
| Net Income (Loss) | 276.1 |
| | 24.5 |
| | (339.5 | ) | | (11.7 | ) |
| Preferred Dividends | — |
| | (1.3 | ) | | (5.6 | ) | | (8.1 | ) |
| Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders | 276.1 |
| | 23.2 |
| | (345.1 | ) | | (19.8 | ) |
| Earnings (Loss) Per Share | | | | | | | |
| Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.82 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | (0.95 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) |
| Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.81 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | (0.95 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| (in millions, except per share data) | First Quarter(1) | | Second Quarter(2) | | Third Quarter(3) | | Fourth Quarter(4) |
| 2018 | | | | | | | |
| Operating Revenues | $ | 1,750.8 |
| | $ | 1,007.0 |
| | $ | 895.0 |
| | $ | 1,461.7 |
|
| Operating Income (Loss) | 400.6 |
| | 118.4 |
| | (315.9 | ) | | (78.4 | ) |
| Net Income (Loss) | 276.1 |
| | 24.5 |
| | (339.5 | ) | | (11.7 | ) |
| Preferred Dividends | — |
| | (1.3 | ) | | (5.6 | ) | | (8.1 | ) |
| Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders | 276.1 |
| | 23.2 |
| | (345.1 | ) | | (19.8 | ) |
| Earnings (Loss) Per Share | | | | | | | |
| Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.82 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | (0.95 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) |
| Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.81 |
| | $ | 0.07 |
| | $ | (0.95 | ) | | $ | (0.05 | ) |
| 2017 | | | | | | | |
| Operating Revenues | $ | 1,598.6 |
| | $ | 990.7 |
| | $ | 917.0 |
| | $ | 1,368.3 |
|
| Operating Income | 415.4 |
| | 124.0 |
| | 111.2 |
| | 270.6 |
|
| Net Income (Loss) | 211.3 |
| | (44.4 | ) | | 14.0 |
| | (52.4 | ) |
| Earnings (Loss) Per Share | | | | | | | |
| Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.65 |
| | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | (0.16 | ) |
| Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Share | $ | 0.65 |
| | $ | (0.14 | ) | | $ | 0.04 |
| | $ | (0.16 | ) |
(1) Net income for the first quarter of 20182019 was impacted by an interest rate swap settlement gain of $21.2$108.0 million in insurance recoveries (pretax). related to the Greater Lawrence Incident. See Note 9, "Risk Management Activities"19-E, "Other Matters" for additional information.
(2) Net income for the second quarter of 20172019 was impacted by a $111.5$297.0 million lossin insurance recoveries (pretax) on an early extinguishment of long-term debt.related to the Greater Lawrence Incident. See Note 14, "Long-Term Debt"19-E, "Other Matters" for additional information.
(3) Net incomeloss for the third quarter of 2018 was impacted by approximately $462 million in expenses (pretax) related to the Greater Lawrence Incident restoration and a $33.0 million loss (pretax) on an early extinguishment of long-term debt. See Note 18-E,19-E, "Other Matters" and Note 14, "Long-Term Debt" for additional information.
(4) Net incomeloss for the fourth quarter of 20182019 was impacted by approximately $426an impairment charge of $204.8 million for goodwill and an impairment charge of $209.7 million for franchise rights, in expenses (pretax, net of insurance recoveries)each case related to the Greater Lawrence Incident restoration, partially offset by an interest rate swap settlement gainColumbia of $25.0 million (pretax)Massachusetts. For additional information, see Note 6, "Goodwill and a $120.7 million income tax benefit from true-ups to reflect regulatory outcomes associated with excess deferred income taxes. Net income for the fourth quarter of 2017 was impacted by a $161.1 million increase in tax expense as a result of implementing the provisions of the TCJA. See Note 18-E, "Other Matters,Other Intangible Assets." Note 9, "Risk Management Activities" and Note 10, "Income Taxes" for additional information.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
24.25. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following table provides additional information regarding our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2017 and 2016:2017:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2017 |
| Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information | | | | | |
| Non-cash transactions: | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures included in current liabilities | $ | 223.6 |
| | $ | 152.0 |
| | $ | 173.0 |
|
| Assets acquired under a finance lease | 26.4 |
| | 54.6 |
| | 11.5 |
|
| Assets acquired under an operating lease | 13.4 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Reclassification of other property to regulatory assets(1) | — |
| | 245.3 |
| | — |
|
Assets recorded for asset retirement obligations(2) | 54.6 |
| | 78.1 |
| | 11.4 |
|
| Schedule of interest and income taxes paid: | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized amounts | $ | 349.7 |
| | $ | 354.2 |
| | $ | 339.9 |
|
| Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds | 10.8 |
| | 3.3 |
| | 5.5 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Year Ended December 31, (in millions) | 2018 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information | | | | | |
| Non-cash transactions: | | | | | |
| Capital expenditures included in current liabilities | $ | 152.0 |
| | $ | 173.0 |
| | $ | 125.3 |
|
| Assets acquired under a capital lease | 54.6 |
| | 11.5 |
| | 4.0 |
|
Reclassification of other property to regulatory assets(1) | 245.3 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
Assets recorded for asset retirement obligations(2) | 78.1 |
| | 11.4 |
| | 6.9 |
|
| Schedule of interest and income taxes paid: | | | | | |
| Cash paid for interest, net of interest capitalized amounts | $ | 354.2 |
| | $ | 339.9 |
| | $ | 337.8 |
|
| Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds | 3.3 |
| | 5.5 |
| | 8.0 |
|
(1)See Note 8 "Regulatory Matters" for additional information.
(2)See Note 7 "Asset Retirement Obligations" for additional information.
NISOURCE INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
26. Subsequent Event
On February 26, 2020, NiSource and Columbia of Massachusetts entered into the Asset Purchase Agreement with Eversource. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Asset Purchase Agreement, NiSource and Columbia of Massachusetts agreed to sell to Eversource, with certain additions and exceptions: (1) substantially all of the assets of Columbia of Massachusetts and (2) all of the assets held by any of Columbia of Massachusetts’ affiliates that primarily relate to the Massachusetts Business, and Eversource agreed to assume certain liabilities of Columbia of Massachusetts and its affiliates. The liabilities assumed by Eversource under the Asset Purchase Agreement do not include, among others, any liabilities arising out of the Greater Lawrence Incident or liabilities of Columbia of Massachusetts or its affiliates pursuant to civil claims for injury of persons or damage to property to the extent such injury or damage occurs prior to the closing in connection with the Massachusetts Business. The Asset Purchase Agreement provides for a purchase price of $1,100 million in cash, subject to adjustment based on Columbia of Massachusetts’ net working capital as of the closing. The closing of the transactions contemplated by the Asset Purchase Agreement is subject to Hart-Scott Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 and regulatory approvals, resolution of certain proceedings before governmental bodies and other conditions. The Massachusetts Business did not meet the requirements under GAAP to be classified as held-for-sale as of December 31, 2019. When the Massachusetts Business meets the requirements to be classified as held-for-sale, in each period leading up to the closing date of the transaction, the assets and liabilities of the Massachusetts Business will be measured at fair value, less costs to sell. The final pre-tax gain or loss on the transaction will be determined as of the closing date. Assuming the Massachusetts Business is classified as held-for-sale at March 31, 2020, we estimate that the total pre-tax loss to be measured in the quarter ended March 31, 2020 will be approximately $360 million, based on December 31, 2019 asset and liability balances and estimated transaction costs. This estimated pre-tax loss is subject to change based on estimated transaction costs, working capital adjustments and asset and liability balances at each measurement date leading up to the closing date. The sale is expected to close by September 30, 2020, subject to closing conditions.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (continued)
NISOURCE INC.
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
| | | Twelve months ended December 31, 2019 | | Twelve months ended December 31, 2019 |
| | | | Additions | | | | |
| ($ in millions) | | Balance Jan. 1, 2019 | | Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Charged to Other Account (1) | | Deductions for Purposes for which Reserves were Created | | Balance Dec. 31, 2019 |
| Reserves Deducted in Consolidated Balance Sheet from Assets to Which They Apply: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve for accounts receivable | | $ | 21.1 |
| | $ | 21.6 |
| | $ | 41.3 |
| | $ | 64.8 |
| | $ | 19.2 |
|
| Reserve for other investments | | 3.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.0 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Twelve months ended December 31, 2018 | | | | Additions | | | | | | | Additions | | | | |
| ($ in millions) | Balance Jan. 1, 2018 | | Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Charged to Other Account (1) | | Deductions for Purposes for which Reserves were Created | | Balance Dec. 31, 2018 | Balance
Jan. 1, 2018 | | Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Charged to Other Account (1) | | Deductions for Purposes for which Reserves were Created | | Balance
Dec. 31, 2018 |
| Reserves Deducted in Consolidated Balance Sheet from Assets to Which They Apply: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve for accounts receivable | $ | 18.3 |
| | $ | 20.2 |
| | $ | 43.7 |
| | $ | 61.1 |
| | $ | 21.1 |
| $ | 18.3 |
| | $ | 20.2 |
| | $ | 43.7 |
| | $ | 61.1 |
| | $ | 21.1 |
|
| Reserve for other investments | 3.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.0 |
| 3.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.0 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Twelve months ended December 31, 2017 | | | | | Additions | | | | | | | Additions | | | | |
| ($ in millions) | Balance
Jan. 1, 2017 | | Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Charged to Other Account (1) | | Deductions for Purposes for which Reserves were Created | | Balance
Dec. 31, 2017 | Balance
Jan. 1, 2017 | | Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Charged to Other Account (1) | | Deductions for Purposes for which Reserves were Created | | Balance
Dec. 31, 2017 |
| Reserves Deducted in Consolidated Balance Sheet from Assets to Which They Apply: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve for accounts receivable | $ | 23.3 |
| | $ | 14.8 |
| | $ | 39.1 |
| | $ | 58.9 |
| | $ | 18.3 |
| $ | 23.3 |
| | $ | 14.8 |
| | $ | 39.1 |
| | $ | 58.9 |
| | $ | 18.3 |
|
| Reserve for other investments | 3.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.0 |
| 3.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.0 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Twelve months ended December 31, 2016 | |
| | | | Additions | | | | | |
| ($ in millions) | Balance
Jan. 1, 2016 | | Charged to Costs and Expenses | | Charged to Other Account (1) | | Deductions for Purposes for which Reserves were Created | | Balance
Dec. 31, 2016 | |
| Reserves Deducted in Consolidated Balance Sheet from Assets to Which They Apply: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Reserve for accounts receivable | $ | 20.3 |
| | $ | 19.7 |
| | $ | 48.5 |
| | $ | 65.2 |
| | $ | 23.3 |
| |
| Reserve for other investments | 3.0 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | 3.0 |
| |
(1) Charged to Other Accounts reflects the deferral of bad debt expense to a regulatory asset.
NISOURCE INC.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer are responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act are accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that financial information was processed, recorded and reported accurately.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, are responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act. However, management would note that a control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Our management has adopted the 2013 framework set forth in the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission report, Internal Control - Integrated Framework, the most commonly used and understood framework for evaluating internal control over financial reporting, as its framework for evaluating the reliability and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. During 2018,2019, we conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the end of the period covered by this annual report.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, issued an attestation report on our internal controls over financial reporting which is contained in Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”included herein.
Changes in Internal Controls
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
NISOURCE INC.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the stockholders and the Board of Directors of NiSource Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of NiSource Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019, of the Company and our report dated February 27, 2020, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Columbus, Ohio
February 27, 2020
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
NISOURCE INC.
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Except for the information required by this item with respect to our executive officers included at the end of Part I of this report on Form 10-K, the information required by this Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion in "Proposal 1 Election of Directors," and "Corporate Governance," and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,"Governance" of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 7, 2019.19, 2020.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion in "Corporate Governance - Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," "Director Compensation," "Executive Compensation," and "Executive Compensation - Compensation Committee Report," of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 7, 2019.
19, 2020.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion in "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 7, 2019.
19, 2020.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion in "Corporate Governance - Policies and Procedures with Respect to Transactions with Related Persons" and "Corporate Governance - Director Independence" of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 7, 2019.
19, 2020.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference to the discussion in "Independent Auditor Fees" of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on May 7, 2019.19, 2020.
PART IV
NISOURCE INC.
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules
The following financial statements and financial statement schedules filed as a part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K are included in Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data."
Exhibits
The exhibits filed herewith as a part of this report on Form 10-K are listed on the Exhibit Index below. Each management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement of ours, listed on the Exhibit Index, is separately identified by an asterisk.
Pursuant to Item 601(b), paragraph (4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments representing long-term debt of our subsidiaries have not been included as Exhibits because such debt does not exceed 10% of the total assets of ours and our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. We agree to furnish a copy of any such instrument to the SEC upon request.
|
| |
EXHIBIT NUMBER | DESCRIPTION OF ITEM |
| | |
| (1.1) |
|
| | |
| (1.2) |
|
| | |
| (2.1) | Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between NiSource Inc. and Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2015). |
| |
| (2.2) | Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 26, 2020, by and among NiSource Inc., Bay State Gas Company d/b/a Columbia Gas of Massachusetts and Eversource Energy (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2020).***
|
| | |
| (3.1) |
|
| | |
| (3.2) |
|
| |
| (3.3) |
|
| | |
(3.3)(3.4) | Certificate of Designations of 5.65% Series A Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2018).
|
| | |
(3.4)(3.5) | Form of Certificate of Designations of 6.50% Series B Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on November 29, 2018).
|
| | |
(3.5)(3.6) | Certificate of Designations of 6.50% Series B Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2018).
|
| | |
(3.6) |
| |
| (3.7) |
|
| | |
| (4.1) | Indenture, dated as of March 1, 1988, by and between Northern Indiana Public Service Company ("NIPSCO") and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to the NIPSCO Registration Statement (Registration No. 33-44193)). |
| | |
|
| |
| (4.2) | First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 1, 1991, by and between Northern Indiana Public Service Company and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NIPSCO Registration Statement (Registration No. 33-63870)). |
| | |
| (4.3) | Indenture Agreement, dated as of February 14, 1997, by and between NIPSCO Industries, Inc., NIPSCO Capital Markets, Inc. and Chase Manhattan Bank as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NIPSCO Industries, Inc. Registration Statement (Registration No. 333-22347)). |
| | |
| (4.4) | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 1, 2000, by and among NiSource Capital Markets, Inc., NiSource Inc., New NiSource Inc., and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.45 to the NiSource Inc. Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2000). |
| | |
| (4.5) | Indenture, dated November 14, 2000, among NiSource Finance Corp., NiSource Inc., as guarantor, and The Chase Manhattan Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NiSource Inc. Form S-3, dated November 17, 2000 (Registration No. 333-49330)). |
| | |
| (4.6) | |
| | |
| (4.7) | |
| | |
| (4.8) | |
| | |
| (4.9) | |
| | |
| (4.10) | |
| | |
| (4.11) | Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 30, 2017, between NiSource Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on December 1, 2017). |
| | |
| (4.12) | Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 12, 2018, between Northern Indiana Public Service Company and The Bank of New York Mellon, solely as successor trustee under the Indenture dated as of March 1, 1988 between the Company and Manufacturers Hanover Trust Company, as original trustee. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NiSource Inc. Form 10-Q filed on May 2, 2018).
|
| | |
| (4.13) | Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 11, 2018, by and between NiSource Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (including form of 3.650% Notes due 2023) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2018).
|
| | |
| (4.14) | Deposit Agreement, dated as of December 5, 2018, among NiSource, Inc., Computershare Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., acting jointly as depositary, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts described therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2018).
|
| | |
| (4.15) |
|
| | |
| (4.16) | Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement, dated as of December 27, 2018, among NiSource, Inc., Computershare Inc. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., acting jointly as depositary, and the holders from time to time of the depositary receipts described therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on December 27, 2018).
|
| | |
| (4.17) |
|
| |
| (4.18) |
|
| |
|
| |
| (4.19) |
|
| |
| (4.20) |
|
| | |
| (10.1) | |
| | |
| (10.2) | |
| | |
| (10.3) | |
| | |
|
| |
| (10.4) | |
| | |
| (10.5) | |
| |
(10.6) | Form of Amended and Restated 2013 Performance Share Agreement effective on implementation of the spin-off on July 1, 2015, (under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the NiSource Inc. Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2015).* |
| | |
(10.7)(10.6) | Form of Amended and Restated 2014 Performance Share Agreement effective on the implementation of the spin-off on July 1, 2015, (under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the NiSource Inc. Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2015).* |
| | |
(10.8)(10.7) | Form of Amendment to Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement related to Vested but Unpaid NiSource Restricted Stock Unit Awards for Nonemployee Directors of NiSource entered into as of July 13, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the NiSource Inc. Form 10-Q filed on November 3, 2015).* |
| | |
(10.9)(10.8) | |
| | |
(10.10)(10.9) | Supplemental Life Insurance Plan effective January 1, 1991, as amended, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the NIPSCO Industries, Inc. Form 8-K filed on March 25, 1992).* |
| | |
(10.11)(10.10) | |
| |
(10.12) | |
| | |
(10.13)(10.11) | |
| | |
(10.14)(10.12) | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Non-employee directors under the Non-employee Director Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the NiSource Inc. Form 10-K filed on February 28, 2011).* |
| | |
(10.15)(10.13) | Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for Nonemployee Directors under the 2010 Omnibus Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to NiSource Inc. Form 10-Q filed on August 2, 2011).* |
| | |
(10.16)(10.14) | |
| |
(10.17) | |
| | |
(10.18)(10.15) | |
| | |
(10.19)(10.16) | Amended and Restated NiSource Inc. Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan effective May 13, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to NiSource Inc. Form 10-Q filed on October 28, 2011).* |
| |
(10.20) | Amended and Restated Pension Restoration Plan for NiSource Inc. and Affiliates effective May 13, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to NiSource Inc. Form 10-Q filed on October 28, 2011).* |
| |
(10.21) | |
| |
(10.22) | |
| | |
(10.23)(10.17) | |
| |
|
| |
(10.24) | Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of November 28, 2016, among NiSource Finance Corp., as Borrower, NiSource Inc., the Lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., as Co-Syndication Agents, Citibank, N.A., Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents, and Barclays Bank PLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd., Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on November 28, 2016). |
| | |
(10.25)(10.18) | |
| | |
(10.26)(10.19) | Amendment No. 1, dated as of November 10, 2008, to the Note Purchase Agreement by and among NiSource Finance Corp., as issuer, NiSource Inc., as guarantor, and the purchasers whose names appear on the signature page thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.30 to the NiSource Inc. Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2009). |
| | |
(10.27) | Term Loan Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2016, by and among NiSource Finance Corp., as Borrower, NiSource Inc., as Guarantor, the Lenders party thereto, and PNC Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent, and Mizuho Bank, Ltd., as Documentation Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the NiSource Inc. Form 10-Q filed on May 3, 2016).
|
| |
(10.28)(10.20) | |
| | |
(10.29)(10.21) | |
| | |
(10.30)(10.22) | Tax Allocation Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between NiSource Inc. and Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2015). |
| |
(10.31) | Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015, by and between NiSource Inc. and Columbia Pipeline Group, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on July 2, 2015). |
| | |
(10.32)(10.23) | |
| | |
(10.33)(10.24) | |
| | |
(10.34)(10.25) | |
| | |
(10.35)(10.26) | Term Loan Agreement dated as of April 18, 2018 among NiSource Inc., as borrower, the lenders party thereto and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as administrative agent and as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2018).
|
| |
(10.36) | Common Stock Subscription Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2018, by and among NiSource Inc. and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on May 2, 2018).
|
| | |
(10.37)(10.27) | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2018, by and among NiSource Inc. and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-Kfiled on May 2, 2018).
|
| | |
(10.38)(10.28) | Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2018, by and among NiSource Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and MUFG Securities Americas Inc., as representatives, relating to the 5.650% Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-Kfiled on June 12, 2018).
|
| | |
(10.39)(10.29) | Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2018, by and among NiSource Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and MUFG Securities Americas Inc., as representatives, relating to the 3.650% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2018). |
| | |
(10.40)(10.30) | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2018, by and among NiSource Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and MUFG Securities Americas Inc., as representatives, relating to the 5.650% Series A Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2018).
|
| | |
|
| |
(10.41)(10.31) | Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of June 11, 2018, by and among NiSource Inc. and Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and MUFG Securities Americas Inc., as representatives, relating to the 3.650% Notes due 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on June 12, 2018).
|
| | |
(10.42)(10.32) |
|
| | |
(10.43)(10.33) |
|
| | |
(10.44)(10.34) |
|
| | |
(10.45)(10.35) | |
| |
| (10.36) | Fifth Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of February 20, 2019, among NiSource Inc., as Borrower, the Lenders party thereto, Barclays Bank PLC, as Administrative Agent, Citibank, N.A. and MUFG Bank, Ltd., as Co-Syndication Agents, Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents, and Barclays Bank PLC, Citibank, N.A., MUFG Bank, Ltd., Credit Suisse Loan Funding LLC, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Bookrunners (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-K filed on February 20, 2019).
|
| |
| (10.37) |
|
| |
|
| |
| (10.38) | Amended and Restated Term Loan Agreement, dated as of April 17, 2019, among NiSource Inc., as Borrower, the Lenders party thereto, and MUFG Bank Ltd., as Administrative Agent and Sole Lead Arranger and Sole Bookrunner (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the NiSource Inc. Form 8-Kfiled on April 17, 2019).
|
| |
| (10.39) | |
| |
| (10.40) | |
| |
| (10.41) | |
| |
| (10.42) |
|
| |
| (10.43) |
|
| | |
| (21) | |
| | |
| (23) | |
| | |
| (31.1) | |
| | |
| (31.2) | |
| | |
| (32.1) | |
| | |
| (32.2) | |
| | |
| (101.INS) | Inline XBRL Instance Document.**Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. ** |
| | |
| (101.SCH) | Inline XBRL Schema Document.** |
| | |
| (101.CAL) | Inline XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document.** |
| | |
| (101.LAB) | Inline XBRL Labels Linkbase Document.** |
| | |
| (101.PRE) | Inline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.** |
| | |
| (101.DEF) | Inline XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.** |
| |
| (104) | Cover page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL, and contained in Exhibit 101.) |
|
| |
| * | Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement of NiSource Inc. |
|
| |
| ** | Exhibit filed herewith. |
|
| |
| *** | Schedules and exhibits have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. NiSource agrees to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedules or exhibits to the SEC upon request. |
References made to NIPSCO filings can be found at Commission File Number 001-04125. References made to NiSource Inc. filings made prior to November 1, 2000 can be found at Commission File Number 001-09779.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, hereunto duly authorized.
|
| | |
| | | NiSource Inc. |
| | | (Registrant) |
| | | |
Date: February 20, 2019 27, 2020 | By: | /s/ JOSEPH HAMROCK |
| | | Joseph Hamrock |
| | | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
| | | (Principal Executive Officer) |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
|
| | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | JOSEPH HAMROCK | | President, Chief | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Joseph Hamrock | | Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer) | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | DONALD E. BROWN | | Executive Vice President and | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Donald E. Brown | | Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | JOSEPH W. MULPAS | | Vice President and | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Joseph W. Mulpas | | Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer) | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | RICHARD L. THOMPSONKEVIN T. KABAT | | Chairman and Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Richard L. ThompsonKevin T. Kabat
| | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | PETER A. ALTABEF | | Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Peter A. Altabef | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | THEODORE H. BUNTING, JR. | | Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Theodore H. Bunting, Jr. | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | ERIC L. BUTLER | | Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Eric L. Butler | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | ARISTIDES S. CANDRIS | | Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Aristides S. Candris | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | WAYNE S. DEVEYDT | | Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Wayne S. DeVeydt | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | DEBORAH A. HENRETTA | | Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Deborah A. Henretta | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | DEBORAH A.P. HERSMAN | | Director | Date: February 27, 2020 |
| | | Deborah A. P. Hersman | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | /s/ | MICHAEL E. JESANIS | | Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Michael E. Jesanis | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | /s/ | KEVIN T. KABAT | | Director | Date: February 20, 2019 |
| | | Kevin T. Kabat | | | |
| | | | | | |
| | /s/ | CAROLYN Y. WOO | | Director | Date: February 20, 201927, 2020 |
| | | | Carolyn Y. Woo | | | |
