TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       Fint

UNITED STATES


SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

2014

OR

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from           to

Commission file number: 000-24085

AXT, INC.


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
94-3031310
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
4281 Technology Drive, Fremont, California
94538
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (510) 683-5900


Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act
o Yes x No

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
o Yes x No

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yeso  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yeso  No

Indicate by checkmark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  o
Accelerated filer  x
Non‑acceleratedNon-accelerated filer  o
Smaller reporting company o

(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Smaller reporting company  o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).o Yes x  No

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing sale price of $2.70$2.14 for the common stock on June 28, 201330, 2014 as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market, was approximately $69,868,000.$53,550,000. Shares of common stock held by each officer, director and by each person who owns 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of March 3, 2014, 32,604,9582015, 32,840,752 shares, $0.001 par value, of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the definitive proxy statement for the registrant’s 20142015 annual meeting of stockholders to be filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this form are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K report. Except for those portions specifically incorporated by reference herein, such document shall not be deemed to be filed with the Commission as part of this Form 10-K.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page
PART I
 
 
Page
PART IItem 1. Business
2
Item 1.1A. Risk Factors
Business10
2
Item 1A.10
Item 1B.
23
24
Item 2. Properties
Properties  24
24
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Legal Proceedings24
24
Item 4.
 
24
PART II
Item 5.
25
Item 6.
27
26
Item 7.
28
27
Item 7A.
41
40
Item 8.
43
41
Item 9.
43
41
Item 9A.
43
41
Item 9B. Other Information
Other Information42
44
PART III
Item 10.
46
44
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Executive Compensation44
46
Item 12.
46
44
Item 13.
44
46
Item 14.
 
46
44
PART IV
Item 15.
45
47

1

1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

This Annual Report (including the following section regarding Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations) contains forward‑lookingforward-looking statements regarding our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “goals,” “should,” “continues,” “would,” “could” and similar expressions or variations of such words are intended to identify forward‑lookingforward-looking statements, but are not the exclusive means of identifying forward‑lookingforward-looking statements in this Annual Report. Additionally, statements concerning future matters such as our strategy, plans and investments, industry trends, the impact of trends and economic cycles on our business, customer demand, the development of new products, applications, enhancements or technologies, sales levels, expense levels, planned investments and other statements regarding matters that are not historical are forward‑looking statements.

forward-looking statements

Although forward‑lookingforward-looking statements in this Annual Report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently known by us. Consequently, forward‑lookingforward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties and actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in or anticipated by the forward‑lookingforward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in results and outcomes include without limitation those discussed under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A below, as well as those discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report. Readers are urged not to place undue reliance on these forward‑lookingforward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Annual Report. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward‑lookingforward-looking statements in order to reflect any event or circumstance that may arise after the date of this Annual Report. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made in this Annual Report, which attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Item 1. Business

AXT, Inc. (“AXT”, “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to AXT, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries) is a leading worldwide developer and producer of high-performance compound and single element semiconductor substrates, includingalso known as wafers. The dominant substrates used in producing semiconductor chips are made from silicon. However, certain chips may become too hot or perform their function too slowly if silicon is used as the base material. Alternative or specialty materials are used to replace silicon as the preferred base for the electronic circuit in these situations. We provide such alternative or specialty materials in the form of substrates or wafers, including compound and single element substrates. Our compound substrates combine gallium arsenidewith arsenic (GaAs), or combine indium phosphidewith phosphorous (InP) and. Our single element substrates are made from germanium (Ge). Most of our revenue is from sales of GaAs substrates. We currently sell the following substrate products in the sizes and for the applications indicated:

Substrates
Substrate

Diameter
Applications
GaAs (semi-insulating)1”, 2”, 3”, 4”, 5”, 6”
Power amplifiers and radio frequency integrated circuits for wireless handsets (cell phones)
Direct broadcast television
High-performance transistors

Satellite communications
GaAs (semi-conducting)1”, 2”, 3”, 4”,6”, 6”
High brightness light emitting diodes
Lasers
Optical couplers
InP2”, 3”, 4”
Broadband and fiber optic communications
Ge2”, 4”, 6”
Satellite and terrestrial solar cells
Optical applications

We manufacture all of our semiconductor substrates using our proprietary vertical gradient freeze (VGF) technology. Most of our revenue is from sales of GaAs substrates. We manufacture all of our products in the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China), which generally has favorable costs for facilities and labor compared with comparable facilities in the United States, Europe or Japan. We also haveOur supply chain includes AXT subsidiaries and joint ventures in China, which provideChina. We believe this supply chain arrangement provides us pricing advantages, reliable supply and enhanced sourcing lead-times for key raw materials which are central to our final manufactured products. TheseOur subsidiaries and joint ventures produce products including 99.99% pure gallium (4N Ga), high purity gallium, arsenic, germanium, germanium dioxide, pyrolytic boron nitride (pBN)

2

TABLE OF CONTENTS

crucibles and boron oxide (B2O3). Our ownership interestand the ownership held by our consolidated subsidiaries in these entities ranges from 20% to 83%. We consolidate, for accounting purposes, the joint ventures in which we have majority or controlling financial interest and significant influence on management, and employ equity accounting for the joint ventures in which we have a smaller ownership interest. We purchase portions of the materials produced by these joint ventures for our own use and the joint ventures sell the remainder of their production to third parties. We use our direct sales force in the United States and China, and independent sales representatives in Europe and other parts of Asia to market and sell our substrates.

2

The industries in the wireless device, LED and solar cell markets became more competitive and negatively affected our business during 2013, as well as the falling price of raw gallium sold by our joint ventures. We believe these factors will continue to affect our business operations in 2014. However, the strong proliferation of wireless devices and improving market for satellite solar cells will ultimately drive the demand for our substrates in the future. Although our qualification progress in gallium arsenide substrates was slow in 2013 due to consolidation within the base of customers for our products, we will continue our effort and expect it will improve in 2014.

We were incorporated in California in December 1986 and reincorporated in Delaware in May 1998. We changed our name from American Xtal Technology, Inc. to AXT, Inc. in July 2000. Our principal corporate office is located at 4281 Technology Drive, Fremont, California 94538, and our telephone number at this address is
(510) 683-5900.

Industry Background

Certain electronic and opto-electronic applications have performance requirements that exceed the capabilities of conventional silicon substrates and often require high-performance compound or single element substrates. Examples of higher performance non-silicon based substrates include GaAs, InP, gallium nitride (GaN), silicon carbide (SiC) and Ge.

For example, power amplifiers and radio frequency integrated circuits for wireless handsets and other wireless devices are made with semi-insulating GaAs substrates. Semi-conducting GaAs substrates are used to create opto-electronic products including high brightness light emitting diodes (HBLEDs) that are often used to backlight wireless handsets and liquid crystal display (LCD) TVs and are also used for automotive panels, signage, display and lighting applications. InP is a high performance semiconductor substrate used in broadband and fiber optic applications. Ge substrates are used in emerging applications such as solar cells for space and terrestrial photovoltaic applications.

The AXT Advantage

We believe that we benefit from the following advantages:

Low-cost manufacturing operation in the PRC.  Since 2004, we have manufactured all of our products in China, which generally has favorable costs for facilities and labor compared to comparable facilities in the United States or Europe. As of December 31, 2013, approximately 1,232 of our 1,255

Low-cost manufacturing operation in China. We have manufactured all of our products in China since 2004, which generally has favorable costs for facilities and labor compared to comparable facilities in the United States, Japan or Europe. As of December 31, 2014, approximately 1,071 of our 1,095 employees (including employees at our consolidated joint ventures) are in China. Our primary competitors have their major manufacturing operations in Germany or Japan and have limited manufacturing operations in China.
Our diverse product offering results in a broader range of customers and applications. We offer a diverse range of products which enables us to have a broad range of customers. For the year ended December 31, 2014, no customer accounted for over 10% of revenue and our five largest customers accounted for 34% of our revenue. We believe this diversity enabled us to recover more quickly when a large portion of GaAs chips was replaced with silicon-on-insulator (SOI) chips in mobile phone switches beginning in 2011. Further, we believe this diversity gives us a greater likelihood to grow our business in new applications and benefit from growth in demand for substrates given our pre-established market positions in a broad range of product applications.
We have 10 joint ventures and subsidiaries in China that form our sophisticated, vertically integrated supply chain. We believe our subsidiaries and joint ventures in China provide us with more reliable supply and shorter lead-times for the raw materials central to our final manufactured products compared to third party providers. These materials include gallium, gallium alloys, indium phosphide poly-crystal, germanium, germanium dioxide, high purity arsenic, pyrolytic boron nitride crucibles (pBN) and boron oxide (B2O3). We believe this dedicated supply chain will enable us to meet increases in demand from our customers by providing an increased volume of raw materials quickly, efficiently and cost effectively.
Enhanced revenue diversity through the sale of special materials. Because our strategy allows our subsidiaries to also sell in the open market to third parties, approximately a quarter of our total sales are from non-substrate products, providing further diversity in our customer base and business model.
Business model unique among current competitors. We are the only publicly traded company focused on high-performance compound and single element semiconductor substrates. Most of our direct competitors

3

Favorable

TABLE OF CONTENTS

are either privately owned or are a small division of large publicly traded companies. We believe the combination of access to raw materials.  Our joint ventures in China provide us reliable supplyU.S. capital markets, U.S.-based product quality standards and shorter lead-times for raw materials centralChina-based manufacturing is an attractive business model to our final manufactured products. These materials include gallium, arsenic, germanium, germanium dioxide, pyrolytic boron nitride cruciblescustomers who desire longevity and boron oxide. As a result, we believe that our joint ventures will enable us to meet potential increasesstability in demand from our customers by providing a more stable and quickertheir supply of raw materials

Flexible manufacturing infrastructure.  Our total manufacturing space in China is approximately 190,000 square feet which we currently use for wafer processing. We believe that our competitors typically purchase crystal growing furnaces from original equipment manufacturers. In contrast, we design and build our own VGF crystal growing furnaces, which we believe should allow us to increase our production capacity more quickly and cost effectively.
chain as well as low cost.

Strategy

Our goal is to become the leading worldwide supplier of high-performance compound and single element semiconductor substrates. Key elements of our strategy include:

Continue

Offer diverse products, including custom products. We believe AXT has a reputation in the market place for providing a broad range of products, including custom products. We plan to further promote this brand image as a way to differentiate ourselves in the market place. Some competitors provide only gallium arsenide substrates. We provide gallium arsenide and also indium phosphide and germanium substrates. Some competitors provide only six inch wafers. Our wafers range from one inch up to six inches. We also produce substrates with customer defined specifications which may range from thickness or smoothness and may include adding special additional chemicals such as iron or sulfur. We believe product diversity can mitigate some of the impact of down cycles in our market because we are not dependent on a single product or application for revenue.

Many customers high and consistent quality products and service.not just a few large customers. We seek to improveexpand our customer base and avoid dependence on just a few large customers. We believe our diverse product offering has resulted in a diverse customer base. For the year ended December 31, 2014, no customer accounted for over 10% of revenue and our five largest customers accounted for 34% of our revenue. We believe customer diversity provides a measure of stability in troubled market conditions. Customer diversification may also enable us to achieve a higher average selling price by reducing our dependence on larger customers with pricing power.

China-based manufacturing. We seek to leverage our China-based manufacturing advantage by increasing efficiencies in our manufacturing processes continuallymethods, systems and processes. In 1998 we decided to locate our manufacturing in orderChina and in 1999 we began to meet and exceedmove our customers’ high product quality standards, ensure on-time deliverymanufacturing to facilities on the outskirts of Beijing. Approximately 97% of our employees are based in China. This enables us to compete more effectively against our competitors who, by comparison, are in relatively high cost locations such as Japan and Germany. We plan to further leverage these advantages by investing in training and equipment to increase productivity and reduce cost. It is our strategy to combine the benefits of U.S.-based quality and U.S.-based access to capital markets with China-based manufacturing.

Increase productivity and profitability in our 10 subsidiaries/joint ventures. AXT’s substrate products are based on specialty materials, many of which are mined and optimizerefined in China. The supply and demand equation for specialty materials can be complex and can be volatile. Our strategy to maintain a stable supply chain has been to establish and nurture startup companies in China where we have a significant or majority ownership position or at least a significant equity position. Over the costyears we have established or invested in 10 companies who are an integral part of ownership.our supply chain. We expect towill continue to improveprovide strategic support to these companies and they, in turn, will continue to be the backbone of our manufacturing processessupply chain. We plan to work closely with these companies to increase their productivity and profitability as they continue to support AXT’s supply chain.

Sell raw materials into the market place. We leverage the established capabilities of our 10 subsidiaries and joint ventures by authorizing them to sell materials into the open market, including to some of our direct competitors. For the year ended December 31, 2014 approximately a quarter of our consolidated revenue was derived from the sale of raw materials to third parties.

Promote AXT’s longevity and stability. We believe recent market trends, including the exit of one of our major competitors in 2014 by adding additional equipment, automating additional processes,Japan from the gallium arsenide substrate market, has highlighted supply continuity concerns among our customers. Since AXT was established in 1986 and streamlining performance. In addition,has been a publicly traded company since 1998, we plan to continuepromote our long operating history and highlight our position as a stable, reliable and long term provider of substrates and materials by among other things, investing in research and development and high-end processing equipment.

Materials of the future. The specialty materials substrate market is dynamic and subject to enhancecontinued changes and cycles. We plan to use our support functions, including servicedeep knowledge and experience in specialty materials and wafer substrates to seek new applications engineering.

3

Increase market share.  We intend to leverage our product quality, competitive pricing and lead times both to establish relationships with new customers and to increase our market share with current customers in the integrated circuits for wireless devices and HBLED markets.
Flexible capacity to meet customers’ increasing demand for substrates.  Although the demand forexisting substrates has been fluctuating in the past year, as we enter 2014, we are reviewing our GaAs substrate capacity and demand for all sizes to make appropriate adjustments in our capacity.
In January 2012, we agreed with the Administrative Commission of Tianjin Economyportfolio and Technology Development Zone to establish a second manufacturing facility in Tianjin, China. The arrangement provides us with land use rights for approximately 32 acres of industrial land located in Yixian Scientific and Industrial Park to construct a compound semiconductor substrate manufacturing facilityexplore additional materials that wouldmay be completed in phases by 2017. We have committed to invest $12.5 million in the first phase of the construction of the facility and have an understandingsynergistic with our BoYu joint venture that it will commit the RMB 32.0 million, or approximately $5.0 million, that is anticipated to be required for the portion of the project devoted to crystal support, in exchange for land use rights, enterpriseknowledge base, customer needs and individual income tax rebates, employee hiring and development subsidies, and other benefits. We expect to fund the first phase of the construction of the facility with cash flow generated by our normal operations supplemented by our existing line of credit. However, we have delayed our participation in the project at this time due to the volatility in our substrate business. It is possible that the investment of $5.0 million will still be funded by our BoYu joint venture for crystal support later in 2014.manufacturing lines.

Establish leadership in emerging substrate applications.  We intend to expand our served markets by exploring new opportunities for our substrates and we continue to work with our customers to enhance our substrate product offering. For example, we have worked on the development of a 6” Ge substrate because the larger usable area in a 6-inch wafer over a 4-inch wafer will substantially reduce the cost of Ge solar cell manufacturing, which we believe is essential for commercial adoption of Ge solar cell technology for terrestrial applications.

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Technology enhancements.  We continue to focus on technology development in the area of VGF technology enhancement. We are working to increase the VGF ingot length and improve our single crystal yield rate. We also continue to work to improve our wafer processing technologies to give us better yield, lower production costs and better quality and performance for our customers.

Technology

There are basically three technologies for crystal growth in our business: Vertical Gradient Freeze (VGF), Liquid Encapsulated Czochralski (LEC), and Czochralski (CZ). Our core technologies include our proprietary VGF techniquetechnology used to produce high-quality crystals that are processed into compound substrates or wafers. Our subsidiaries and the technologies of our joint venture companies have refining and processing technologies which enable usenables them to manufacture a range of products that are usedproduce materials we use in the manufacture of compound semiconductor substrates or can be sold as raw materials to third parties.

4

our products.


Our VGF techniquetechnology is designed to control the crystal‑growthcrystal-growth process with minimal temperature variation and is the current techniquetechnology we use to produce our GaAs, InP and Ge substrates. Unlike traditional techniques,methods, our VGF techniquetechnology places the hot compound melt above the cool crystal, and minimizes the temperature gradient between the crystal and the melt which reduces the turbulence at the interface of the melt and the solid crystal. In comparison, in the LEC techniquemethod the melt and crystal are inverted, there is a higher temperature gradient between the melt and the crystal, and more turbulence at the interface of the melt and solid crystal. These aspects of the VGF techniquetechnology enable us to grow crystals that have a relatively low defect density and high uniformity. The crystal and the resulting substrate are mechanically strong, resulting in lower breakage rates during a customer’s manufacturing process. Since the temperature gradient is controlled electronically rather than by physical movement, the sensitive crystal is not disturbed as it may be during some of our competitors’ VGF-like growth processes. In addition, the melt and growing crystal are contained in a closed chamber, which isolates the crystal from the outside environment to reduce potential contamination. This substrate isolation allows for more precise control of the gallium-to-arsenic ratio, resulting in better consistency and uniformity of the crystals.

We believe that our proprietary VGF techniquetechnology offers several benefits for producing our GaAs substrates when compared to traditional crystal growing technologies. The Horizontal Bridgman (HB) techniqueprocess is the traditional method for producing semi-conducting GaAs substrates for opto-electronic applications, but because of the techniques used to hold the GaAs melt, the HB technique cannot be used cost-effectively to produce substrates greater than three inches in diameter. In addition, the HB technique houses the GaAs melt in a quartz container during the growth process, which can contaminate the GaAs melt with silicon impurities, making it unsuitable for producing semi-insulating GaAs substrates.

We believe our VGF techniquetechnology also offers advantages over the LEC techniquemethod for producing semi-insulating GaAs substrates for wireless applications. Unlike the VGF technique,process, the LEC techniqueprocess can result in greater turbulence in the melt, and at a temperature gradient that is significantly higher than the VGF, technique, which can cause LEC-grown crystals to have a higher dislocation density than VGF-grown crystals, resulting in a higher rate of breakage during the device manufacturing process. However, the LEC technique can be useful for GaAs semi-conducting substrates since the LED application specifications and requirements are less stringent than those of wireless applications.

Products

We design, develop, manufacture and distribute high-performance semiconductor substrates.substrates, also known as wafers. We make semi-insulating GaAs substrates used in making semiconductor chips in applications such as

5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

amplifiers and switches for wireless devices, anddevices. Our semi-conducting GaAs substrates are also used to create opto-electronic products including HBLEDs,High Brightness LEDs, which are often used to backlight wireless handsets and LCD TVs and for automotive, signage, display and lighting applications. InP is a high-performance semiconductor substrate used in broadband and fiber optic applications. Ge substrates are used in emerging applications such as triple junction solar cells for space and terrestrial photovoltaic applications and for optical applications.

5

The table below sets forth our products and selected applications:

Product
Applications
SubstratesElectronicOpto-electronic
GaAsCellular phonesLEDs
Direct broadcast televisionLasers
High-performance transistorsOptical couplers
Satellite communications
CPV
InPFiber optic communicationsLasers
Satellite communications
CPV
High-performance transistors
Photonics
Automotive collision avoidance radar
GeSatellite and terrestrial solar cellsOptical applications

Substrates.We currently sell compound substrates manufactured from GaAs and InP, as well as single‑elementsingle-element substrates manufactured from Ge. We supply both semi-insulating and semiconducting GaAs substrates in one -, two-, three‑three-, four-, five- and six-inch diameters. We supply InP substrates in two-, three‑three- and four-inch diameters, and Ge substrates in two-, four- and six-inch diameters.

Materials. Many of our customers require customized specifications such as special levels of iron or sulfur dopants or the wafer thickness.

We participatehave a long operating history and offer a relatively broad range of products. We promote our product diversity as a way to differentiate ourselves in the market place. Some competitors provide only gallium arsenide substrates. We provide gallium arsenide and also indium phosphide and germanium substrates. Some competitors provide only six inch wafers. Our wafers range from one inch up to six inches. We also produce substrates with customer defined specifications which may range in thickness or smoothness and may include adding special additional chemicals such as iron or sulfur. In addition to our wafers or substrates we also generate revenue from our consolidated subsidiaries who sell raw materials. Product diversity can mitigate some of the down cycles in our market because we are not dependent on a single product or application for revenue.

Materials. We have 10 subsidiaries and joint ventures in China that sell raw materials that may be used by us in substrate manufacturing and by others.or for other purposes. These joint venturescompanies produce products including 99.99% pure gallium (4N Ga), high purity gallium, arsenic, andgallium alloys, indium phosphide poly-crystal, germanium, germanium dioxide, high purity arsenic, pyrolytic boron nitride (pBN) crucibles and boron oxide (B2O3). In 2013, 2012 and 2011, salesoxide.

Customers

Before specialty material wafers can be processed in a typical wafer manufacturing facility that constructs the electronic circuit on a chip, a thin layer of raw materials by these joint ventures to third parties were approximately $21.0 million, $22.2 million and $23.6 million, respectively.

The primary costsstructured chemicals must be grown on the surface of manufacturing compound semiconductor substrates are labor, raw materials and manufacturing equipment such as crystal growing furnaces. Accordingly, substrate manufacturers, including us, are continuing to shift production to larger wafers to reduce manufacturing costs.
Customers
the substrate. This is called an epitaxial layer. We sell our compound semiconductor substrates to companies that apply the epitaxial layer, who then in turn sell the modified wafers to the wafer fabs, chip design companies, LED manufacturers and others.

Epitaxial layer companies that form our customer base are located in Europe, the United States and Asia. We also sell product to universities and other research organizations who use specialty materials worldwide. Our top ten revenue producing customersfor experimentation in 2013 by revenue in alphabetical order were:

• Azur Space Solar Power GmbH• Nan Da Guang Dang
• Guangxi Debang Technology Co., Ltd• Osram Opto Semiconductors GmbH
• IQE Group• Soitec Specialty Electronics
• Landmark Optoelectronics Inc.• TianJin Sanan Optoelectronics Co. Ltd.
• Molycorp Rare Metals Inc.• Visual Photonic Epitaxy Co.
Historically, wevarious aspects of semiconducting and semi insulating applications.

We have at times sold a significant portion of our products in any particular period to a limited number of customers. No However, no customer represented more than 10% of our revenue for the yearyears ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. IQE Group represented approximately 17% and 18% of our revenue for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.2012. Our top five customers, although not the same five customers for each period, represented 31%34%, 37%31% and 35%37% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

There were three third-party customers for the raw materials products from our subsidiaries and joint ventures that accounted for 20%, 13% and 11% of the revenue from raw materials sales for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. We expect that sales to a small number of customers will continue to comprise a significant portion of our revenue in the future.2014,

There were

6

TABLE OF CONTENTS

three third party customers for the raw materials revenueproducts from our subsidiaries and joint ventures that accounted for 11%, 10% and 10% of the revenue from raw materials sales for the year ended December 31, 2013 and one third party customer for the raw materials revenueproducts from our subsidiaries and joint ventures that accounted for 19% of the revenue from raw materials sales for the year ended December 31, 2012, two third party customers for the raw materials revenue from our joint ventures that accounted for 15%2012. Our subsidiaries and 13% of the revenue from raw materials sales for the year ended December 31, 2011. Raw material sales in 2013, 2012 and 2011 approximated $21.0 million, $22.2 million and $23.6 million respectively. Our joint ventures are a key strategic benefit for us as they give us a strong competitive advantage by allowingfurther diversify our customers to work with one supplier for their substrate and raw material requirements. Our raw materials customers include chemical companies. Additionally, we sell raw materials to somesources of the competitors to our substrate business.

6

revenue.

Manufacturing, Raw Materials and Supplies

We believe that our operating results reflect our manufacturing efficiency and high product yields and we continually emphasize quality and process control throughout our manufacturing operations.

We manufacture all of our wafers/substrate products at our facilities in Beijing, China, whichChina. We believe this location generally has favorable costs for facilities and labor compared to our previous manufacturing in the United States. AlthoughStates or compared to the location of some of our competitors in Japan and Germany.

We use a two-stage manufacturing operationsprocess. The first stage deploys our VGF technology for the crystal growth of single element or compound element ingots in diameters currently ranging from one inch to six inch. The growth process occurs in high temperature furnaces built using our proprietary designs. Growing the crystalline elements into cylindrical ingots can take four to twelve days, depending on the diameter and length of the ingot produced. The second stage includes slicing or sawing the ingot into wafers or substrates, then processing each substrate to strict specifications, including grinding to reduce the thickness and then polishing and cleaning each substrate. Many of the process steps utilize proprietary knowledge and chemical baths.

Wafers from each ingot will include some material that does not meet specifications or quality standards. Defects may occur as a result of inherent factors in the materials used in the crystalline growth process. They may also result from variances in the manufacturing process. We have many steps in our line that are partially or fully automated and computer monitored or controlled, enhancing reliability and yield, we expectbut other manufacturing steps are performed manually. We intend to continue to improve our processes and increase the numberlevel of automated processesautomation. Due to potential defects, yield is a key factor in 2014. On February 25,our manufacturing cost. Other key elements are the initial cost of the raw material elements, manufacturing equipment, factory loading, facilities and labor. Our Beijing facilities are approximately 300,000 square feet and we employ approximately 705 employees at this site. In the first quarter of 2014, we announcedinstituted a reduction in force and other cost savings steps and in connection with this restructuring plan with respect to our wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co, Ltd. (“Tongmei”) in order to better align demand with manufacturing capacity.  Under the restructuring plan, Tongmei will implement certain workforce reductions with respect to its manufacturing facility in China.  The Company expects to substantially complete the restructuring plan by March 31, 2014, depending on local legal requirements.  In connection with the restructuring plan, the Company expects to incur aggregate pre-tax restructuringwe incurred charges comprised of severance and other termination benefits of approximately $900,000, but the charges could range from $850,000 to $1.1 million, all of which are currently expected to be recorded in the first fiscal quarter of 2014.

$907,000. We believe our current employee base is appropriate for our current production volume.

We have formed 10 subsidiaries and joint ventures in China that form the backbone of our supply chain model. These companies provide us with reliable supply and shorter lead-times for raw materials central to our manufactured products including gallium, arsenic,gallium alloys, indium phosphide poly-crystal, germanium, germanium dioxide, pyrolitic boron nitride crucibles,high purity arsenic, pBN and boron oxide. We believe that these subsidiaries and joint ventures have been and will continue to be advantageous in allowing us to procure materials to support our planned growth. In addition, we purchase supply parts, components and raw materials from several other domestic and international suppliers. We depend on a single or limited number of suppliers for certain critical materials used in the production of our substrates, such as quartz tubing and polishing solutions. We generally purchase theseour materials through standard purchase orders and not pursuant to long-term supply contracts. Although we seek to maintain sufficient inventory levels of certain materials to guard against interruptions in supply and to meet our near term needs, and have to date been able to obtain sufficient supplies of materials in a timely manner, in the future, we may experience shortages of certain key materials, such as gallium.

Sales and Marketing

We advertise in trade publications, distribute promotional materials, conduct marketing and sales programs, and participate in industry trade shows and conferences in order to raise market awareness of our products.

We sell our substrate products directly to customers through our direct salesforce in the United States and ChinaAsia and through independent sales representatives and distributors in Europe and othersome parts of Asia to market and sell our substrates.Asia. Our direct salesforce is knowledgeable in the use of compound and single‑elementsingle-element substrates. Our applicationsapplication engineers work with customers during all stages of the substrate manufacturing process, from developing the precise composition of the substrate through manufacturing toand processing the substrate to the customer’s specifications. We believe that maintaining a close relationship with customers and providing them with ongoing engineering support improves customer satisfaction and will provide us with a competitive advantage in selling other substrates to our customers.

International Sales. International sales are an importanta substantial part of our business. Sales to customers outside North America (primarily the United States) accounted for 88% of our revenue in 2014 and 2013 and 83% of our revenue in 2012, and 80% of our revenue in 2011.2012. The primary markets for sales of our substrate products outside of the United States are to customers located in Asia and Western Europe.

We also

Our subsidiaries and joint ventures sell through our joint venturesspecialty raw materials including 4N, 5N, 6N, 7N and 8N gallium, boron oxide, germanium, arsenic, germanium dioxide, pyrolytic boron nitride crucibles used in crystal growth and parts for MBE (Molecular Beam Epitaxy). Our joint ventures are a key strategic benefit for us as they give us a strong competitive advantage by allowing our customers to work with one supplier for all their substrateThese subsidiaries and raw material requirements. Our joint ventures have their own separate salesforce where they alsosales forces and sell directly to their own customers in addition to their supply ofselling raw materials to us.

7

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Research and Development

To maintain and improve our competitive position, we focus our research and development efforts on designing new proprietary processes and products, improving the performance of existing products, increasing yields and reducing manufacturing costs. We have assembled a multi‑disciplinarymulti-disciplinary team of skilled scientists, engineers and technicians to meet our research and development objectives.

7

Our current substrate research and development activities focus on continued development and enhancement of GaAs, InP and Ge substrates, including improved yield, enhanced surface and electrical characteristics and uniformity, greater substrate strength and increased crystal length. During 2013,2014, we continued to focus research and development resources to reduce surface quality problems we experienced with our substrates for some customers, particularly related to surface morphology. Although some major problems related to surface quality have been resolved, we still need to continue to improve in this area and expect that this effort in research and development will continue in 2014.2015. One of our joint ventures has been working on research and development projects to qualify for a government incentive program for reduced future tax rates in China and will continue this effort in 2014. We focus our research and development effort to utilize more of our VGF technique to produce high-purity gallium.

2015.

Research and development expenses were $4.1 million in 2014, compared with $3.4 million in 2013 compared withand $3.5 million in 2012 and $2.5 million in 2011. We expect our rate of expenditure on research and development costs in 2014 to remain constant with 2013 as our company and our joint ventures will continue their effort in research and development.

2012.

Competition

The semiconductor substrate industry is characterized by rapid technological change and price erosion, as well as intense foreign and domestic competition. We compete in the market for GaAs substrates with our expertise in VGF technology, product quality, response times and prices. However, we face actual and potential competition from a number of established domestic and international companies who may have advantages not available to us including substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources; greater name recognition; and more established relationships in the industry and they may utilize these advantages to expand their product offerings more quickly, adapt to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements more quickly, and devote greater resources to the marketing and sale of their products.

We believe that the primary competitive factors in the markets in which our substrate products compete are:

quality;
price;
performance;
manufacturing capacity;
meeting customer specifications; and
customer support and satisfaction.

Our ability to compete in target markets also depends on factors such as:

the timing and success of the development and introduction of new products and product features by us and our competitors;
the availability of adequate sources of raw materials;
protection of our products by effective use of intellectual property laws; and
general economic conditions.

A compound semiconductor substrate customer typically has two or three substrate suppliers that it has qualified for the production of its products. These qualified suppliers must meet industry‑standardindustry-standard specifications for quality, on-time delivery and customer support. Once a substrate supplier has qualified with a customer, price, consistent quality and current and future product delivery lead times become the most important competitive factors. A supplier that cannot meet customers’ current lead times or that a customer perceives will not be able to meet future demand and provide consistent quality can lose current market share. Our primary competition in the market for compound semiconductor substrates includes Freiberger Compound Materials, Hitachi Cable, andJX, Umicore, Sumitomo Electric Industries.Industries and China Crystal Technology Corp., (CCTC). We believe that at least two of our competitors are shipping high volumes of GaAs substrates manufactured using a technique similar to our VGF technique. In addition, we also face competition from compound semiconductor device manufacturers that produce substrates for their own internal use, including Hitachi, and from

8

TABLE OF CONTENTS

companies, such as TriQuint Semiconductors, RFMD and Skyworks that are actively developing alternative compoundmaterials to GaAs and marketing semiconductor devices using these alternative materials. Furthermore, silicon on insulatorsilicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology, a semiconductorsilicon wafer technology that produces higher performing and lower power consumption devices, has been proven in the market. In the past year,2011 to 2013, SOI technology has been increasingly adopted for certain types ofdisplaced GaAs chips in key sectors, primarily the radio frequency (RF) applications that have historically been gallium arsenide-based.

8

However,our vertically integrated, sophisticated supply chain through our subsidiaries and joint ventures, we believe we are the only compound semiconductor substrate supplier to offer a full suite of raw materials and we believe that this gives us a strong competitive advantage in our marketplace.

Protection of our Intellectual Property

Our success and the competitive position of our VGF techniquetechnology depend on our ability to maintain our proprietary trade secrets and other intellectual property protections. We rely on a combination of patents, trademark and trade secret laws, non-disclosure agreements and other intellectual property protection methods to protect our proprietary technology. We believe that, due to the rapid pace of technological innovation in the markets for our products, our ability to establish and maintain a position of technology leadership depends as much on the skills of our research and development personnel as upon the legal protections afforded our existing technologies. To protect our trade secrets, we take certain measures to ensure their secrecy, such as executing non-disclosure agreements with our employees, customers and suppliers. However, reliance on trade secrets is only an effective business practice insofar as trade secrets remain undisclosed and a proprietary product or process is not reverse engineered or independently developed.

To date, we have been issued twenty-seven (27)thirty (30) patents that relate to our VGF products and processes, eight (8)nine (9) in the United States (US), two (2)four (4) in Japan (JP), fourteen (14) in China (CN), one (1) in Europe (EP), one (1) in Canada (CA), and one (1) in Korea (KR), which expire in 2016 (2(1 US), 2017 (1 US), 2018 (1 CN), 2021 (6 CN), 2020 (4 CN), 2022 (1 US, 1 CA, 1 EP, 2 JP, 1 KR), 2027 (2 US), 2028 (1 US, 3 CN), 2029 (1 JP), 2030(1 US)US, 1 JP), and 2032 (1(2 US).  We have one allowed JP patent application. We have one (1) US patent application pending and eighteen (18)ten (10) foreign patent applications pending in Europe (2)(1), China (9)(5), Japan (5)(2) and Taiwan (2).


In the normal course of business, we periodically receive and make inquiries regarding possible patent infringement. In dealing with such inquiries, it may become necessary or useful for us to obtain or grant licenses or other rights. However, there can be no assurance that such licenses or rights will be available to us on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to resolve or settle claims, obtain necessary licenses on commercially reasonable terms and/or successfully prosecute or defend our position, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Environmental Regulations

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including laws in China as well as in the United States.States and Europe. These laws, rules and regulations govern the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals during manufacturing, research and development and sales demonstrations. We maintain a number of environmental, health and safety programs that are primarily preventive in nature. As part of these programs, we regularly monitor ongoing compliance. If we fail to comply with applicable regulations, we could be subject to substantial liability for personal injury, clean-up efforts, personal injuryfines and fines or suspension or cessation of our operations.

Employees

As of December 31, 2013,2014, we had 1,255approximately 729 employees which consisted of approximately 24 employees in our headquarters in Fremont and approximately 705 employees in Beijing. In addition, our three consolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures had, in total, approximately 366 employees. In aggregate, we and our subsidiaries had 1,095 employees, of whom 1,050906 were principally engaged in manufacturing, 133122 in sales and administration, and 7267 in research and development. Of these employees, 2324 were located in the United States and 1,2321,071 in China.


As of December 31, 2013, 1,0692014, 907 employees in China were represented by unions, but we have never experienced a work stoppage. We consider our relations with our employees to be good.

9

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Geographical Information

Please see Note 15 of our Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding our foreign operations, and see “Risks related to international aspects of our business” under Item 1A. Risk Factors for further information on risks attendant to our foreign operations and dependence.

9

Available Information

Our principal executive offices are located at 4281 Technology Drive, Fremont, CA 94538, and our main telephone number at this address is (510) 683-5900. Our Internet website address is www.axt.com. Our website address is given solely for informational purposes; we do not intend, by this reference, that our website should be deemed to be part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or to incorporate the information available at our Internet address into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We file electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We make these reports available free of charge through our Internet website as soon as reasonably practicable after we have electronically filed such material with the SEC. These reports can also be obtained from the SEC’s Internet website at www.sec.gov or at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.


Item 1A. Risk Factors


For ease of reference, we have divided these risks and uncertainties into the following general categories:

Risks related to our general business;
Risks related to international aspects of our business;
Risks related to our financial results and capital structure;
Risks related to our intellectual property; and
Risks related to compliance and other legal matters.

Risks Related to Our General Business

Silicon substrates are significantly lower in cost compared to substrates made from specialty materials and new silicon-based technologies could allow silicon based substrates to replace specialty material based substrates for certain applications.

Historically silicon wafers or substrates are less expensive than specialty material substrates such as those that we produce. Electronic designers will generally consider silicon first and only turn to alternative materials if silicon cannot provide the required functionality in terms of power consumption, speed or other specifications. Beginning in 2011 certain applications that had previously used GaAs substrates adopted a new silicon-based technology called Silicon On Insulator, or SOI. SOI technology uses a silicon-insulator-silicon layered substrate in place of conventional silicon substrates in semiconductor manufacturing. SOI products cost less than GaAs substrates and although their performance is not as robust as GaAs substrates in terms of power consumption, heat generation and speed it is still acceptable in mobile phone and other applications that were previously dominated by GaAs substrates. The adoption of SOI has resulted in decreased GaAs wafer demand, and decreased revenue. If SOI or similar technologies gain more widespread market acceptance, or are used in more applications, our business and operating results could be significantly and adversely affected.

Underutilizing our manufacturing facilities may result in declines in our gross margins.

An important factor in our success is the extent to which we are able to utilize the available capacity in our manufacturing facilities. A number of factors and circumstances may reduce utilization rates, including periods of industry overcapacity, low levels of customer orders, operating inefficiencies, mechanical failures and disruption of operations due to expansion, power interruptions, fire, flood or other natural disasters or calamities. Because many portions of our manufacturing costs are relatively fixed, high utilization rates are critical to our gross margins and operating results. If we fail to achieve acceptable manufacturing volumes or experience product shipment delays, our

10

TABLE OF CONTENTS

results of operations couldwill be negatively affected. During periods of decreased demand, we have underutilized our manufacturing lines. If we are unable to improve utilization levels at our facilities during periods of decreased demand and correctly manage capacity, the increasedfixed expense levels will have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our gross profit margins have fluctuated from period to period, and these fluctuations are expected to continue in the future. Within the last two years, our gross profit margin has fluctuated from 34.9%15.6% in the quarter ended March 31,, 2012 2013 to 15.1%25.4% for the quarter ended December 31, 2013.

2014.

In 2013, we concluded that incoming orders were insufficient and that we were significantly underutilizing our factory capacity. As a result, in February 2014, we announced a restructuring plan with respect to our wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co, Ltd. (“Tongmei”), or Tongmei, in order to better align demandmanufacturing capacity with manufacturing capacity.demand. Under the restructuring plan, Tongmei will implement certain workforce reductions with respect to its manufacturing facilitywe posted a charge of approximately $907,000 in China. Significant risks associated with this plan that may impair our ability to achieve anticipated cost reductions or that may otherwise harm our business include delays in implementationfirst quarter of anticipated workforce reductions due to highly regulated local legal requirements, decreases in employee morale and the failure to meet operational targets due to the loss of employees.

2014.

If we receive fewer customer orders than forecasted or if our customers delay or cancel orders, we may not be able to reduce our manufacturing costs in the short-term and our gross margins would be negatively affected. In addition, lead times required by our customers are shrinking which reduces our ability to forecast revenueorders and adjustproperly balance our costs in the short-term.

Shifts in our product mix may result in declines in gross margins.
capacity utilization.

Our gross profit margins vary among ourmargin has fluctuated historically and may decline due to several factors.

Our gross product families, and are generally higher on our larger diameter wafers. In addition, historically our gross margins have been higher on our raw materials sales. Accordingly, our overall gross margins havemargin has fluctuated from period to period as a result of shifts in product mix, the introduction of new products, decreases in average selling prices for products, utilization of our manufacturing capacity and our ability to reduce product costs, and thesecosts. These fluctuations are expected to continue in the future.

10

We do not control the prices at which our subsidiaries and joint venture companies sell their raw materials products to third parties. However, as we consolidate the results of three of these companies with our own, any reduction in their gross margins could have a significant, adverse impact on our overall gross margins. One or more of our joint venture companies has in the past, and may in the future, sell raw materials at significantly reduced prices in order to gain volume sales or sales to new customers. In such an event, our gross margin may be adversely impacted. In addition, one of our joint venturesconsolidated subsidiaries has in the past been subject to capacity constraints requiring it to source product from other third party suppliers in order to meet customer demand, resulting in decreased gross margin and adversely impacting our gross margin. This joint venture may in the future continue to experience such capacity restraints, causing our gross margin, and consequently our operating results, to be adversely impacted.


The average selling prices of our products may decline over relatively short periods, which may reduce our gross margins.
The market

Intense competition in the markets for our products is characterized by declining average selling prices resultingcould prevent us from factors such as increased competition, overcapacity, the introduction of new productsincreasing revenue and decreased sales of products incorporating our products and as a result average selling pricessustaining profitability.

The markets for our products may decline over relatively short time periods.are intensely competitive. We have in the past experienced, and in the future may experience, substantial period-to-period fluctuations in operating results due to declining average selling prices. On average, we have experienced average selling price declines over the courseface competition for our substrate products from other manufacturers of the past twelve months of anywhere from approximately 5% to 20% per year depending on the product. It is also possible for the pace of average selling price declines to accelerate beyond these levels for certain products in a commoditizing market. We anticipate that average selling prices will decrease in the future in response to the unstable demand environment, product introductions by competitors or us, or by other factors, including pricing pressures from significant customers. When our average selling prices decline, our gross profits decline unless we are able to sell more products or reduce the cost to manufacture our products. We generally attempt to combat average selling price declines by improving yields, manufacturing efficiency and working to reduce the costs of our raw materials and of manufacturing our products. We have in the past and may in the future experience declining sales prices, which could negatively impact our revenues, gross profits and financial results. We therefore need to sell our current products in increasing volumes to offset any decline in their average selling prices, and introduce new products, which we may not be able to do, or do on a timely basis.

We may be unable to reduce the cost of our products sufficiently to enable us to compete with others. Our cost reduction efforts may not allow us to keep pace with competitive pricing pressures and could adversely affect our margins. In order to remain competitive, we must continually reduce the cost of manufacturing our products through design and engineering changes. We cannot assure you that any changes effected by us will result in sufficient cost reductions to allow us to reduce the price of our products to remain competitive or improve our gross margins.
Ongoing financial market volatility and adverse changes in the domestic and global economic environment could have a significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We are subject to the risks arising from adverse changes and uncertainty in domestic and global economies. Uncertain global economic conditions and low or negative growth in China, Europe and the United States, along with difficulties in the financial markets, national debt and fiscal concerns in various regions are posing challenges to our industry.   The possible duration and severity of this adverse economic cycle is unknown. Although we remain well-capitalized and have not suffered any liquidity issues as a result of those events, the cost and availability of funds may be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets. Continued turbulence in U.S. and international markets and economies may adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and profitability. Another severe or prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of risks to our business, including:
increased volatility in our stock price;
increased volatility in foreign currency exchange rates;
delays in, or curtailment of, purchasing decisions by our customers or potential customers either as a result of overall economic uncertainty or as a result of their inability to access the liquidity necessary to engage in purchasing initiatives;
increased credit risk associated with our customers or potential customers, particularly those that may operate in industries most affected by the economic downturn,substrates, such as financial services;Freiberger Compound Materials, JX, Umicore, Sumitomo Electric Industries and
11

impairment of our intangible or other assets.
We have experienced CCTC, from semiconductor device manufacturers that produce substrates for their own use, and expectfrom companies, such as TriQuint Semiconductors, RFMD and Skyworks that are actively developing alternative materials to continue to experience delays in customer purchasing decisions or disruptions in normal volume of customer orders that we believe are in part due to the uncertainties in the global economyGaAs and an adverse impact on consumer spending. During challenging and uncertain economic times and in tight credit markets, many customers delay or reduce technology purchases. To the extent that the current economic downturn worsens or persists, or any of the above risks occur, our business and operating results could be significantly and adversely affected.
Current global economic conditions may have an impact on our business and financial condition in ways that we currently cannot predict.
Our operations and financial results depend on worldwide economic conditions and their impact on levels of business spending, which had deteriorated significantly in many countries and regions in previous years and may be depressed for the foreseeable future. Uncertainties in the financial and credit markets have caused our customers to postpone deliveries of ordered systems and placement of new orders. Continued uncertainties may reduce future sales of our products and services. The revenue growth and profitability of our business depends on the overall demand for our substrates, and we are particularly dependent on the market conditions for the wireless, solid‑state illumination, fiber optics and telecommunications industries. Because our sales are primarily to major corporate customers whose businesses fluctuate with general economic and business conditions, a softening of demand for products that use our substrates, caused by a weakening economy, may result in decreased revenue. Customers may find themselves facing excess inventory from earlier purchases, and may defer or reconsider purchasing products due to the downturn in their business and in the general economy. If market conditions deteriorate, we may experience increased collection times and greater write-offs, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and our cash flow.
In addition, the tightening of credit markets and concerns regarding the availability of credit may make it more difficult for our customers to raise capital, whether debt or equity, to finance their purchases of capital equipment, including the products we sell. Delays in our customers’ ability to obtain such financing, or the unavailability of such financing, would adversely affect our product sales and revenues and therefore harm our business and operating results. We cannot predict the timing, duration of or effect on our business of the economic slowdown or the timing or strength of any subsequent recovery.

The loss of one or more of our key substrate customers would significantly hurt our operating results.
A small number of substrate customers have historically accounted for a substantial portion of our total revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2013, IQE Group represented 8% of our revenue, compared to 17% in the year ended December 31, 2012 and 18% in 2011. Our top five customers, although not the same customers for each period, represented 31% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2013, 37% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012, and 35% of revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011. We expect that a significant portion of our future revenue will continue to be derived from a limited number of substrate customers. Most of our customers are not obligated to purchase a specified quantity of our products or to provide us with binding forecasts of product purchases. In addition, our customers may reduce, delay or cancel orders at any time without any significant penalty. In the past, we have experienced slower bookings, significant push-outs and cancellation of orders from customers. If we lose a major customer or if a customer cancels, reduces or delays orders, or reduces the prices paid for our products, our revenue would decline. In addition, customers that have accounted for significant revenue in the past may not continue to generate revenue for us in any future period. Any delay in scheduled shipments of our products could cause revenue to fall below our expectations and the expectations of market analysts or investors, causing our stock price to decline.
Defects in our products could diminish demand for our products.
Our products are complex and may contain defects. We have experienced quality control problems with some of our products, which caused customers to return products to us, reduce orders for our products, or both.marketing semiconductor devices using these alternative materials. We believe that we continue to experience some reduction in orders as a resultat least two of our product quality problems.major competitors are shipping high volumes of GaAs substrates manufactured using a technique similar to our VGF technology. Other competitors may develop and begin using similar technology. If we continueare unable to experience quality control problems, or experience these or other problems in new products, customerscompete effectively, our revenue may cancel or reduce orders or purchase products from our competitors,not increase and we may be unable to maintainremain profitable. We face many competitors that have a number of significant advantages over us, including:

greater name recognition and market share in the business;
more manufacturing experience;
extensive intellectual property;
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources.

Our competitors could develop new or increase sales toenhanced products that are more effective than our customersproducts.

The level and salesintensity of our products could decline. Defects in our products could cause us to incur higher manufacturing costs and suffer product returns and additional service expenses, all of which could adversely impact our operating results.

If new products developed by us contain defects when released, our customers may be dissatisfiedcompetition has increased over the past years and we may suffer negative publicity or customer claims against us, lose sales or experience delays in market acceptance of our new products.
12

If we do not successfully develop new productsexpect competition to respondcontinue to rapidly changing customer requirements, our ability to generate revenue, obtain new customers, and retain existing customers may suffer.
Our success depends on our ability to offer new products and product features that incorporate leading technology and respond to technological advances. In addition, our new products must meet customer needs and compete effectively on quality, price and performance. The life cycles of our products are difficult to predict because the markets for our products are characterized by rapid technological change, changing customer needs and evolving industry standards. If our competitors introduce products employing new technologies or performance characteristics, our existing products could become obsolete and unmarketable. During the past few years, we have seen our competitors selling more substrates manufactured using a crystal growth technology similar to ours, which has eroded our technological differentiation. Other companies, including TriQuint Semiconductors, RFMD and Skyworks are actively developing substrate materials that could be used to manufacture devices that could provide the same high-performance, low-power capabilities as GaAs-based devices at competitive prices. For examples, silicon on insulator (SOI) technology uses layered silicon-insulator-silicon substrate in place of conventional silicon substrates in semiconductor manufacturing; complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) technology is used for constructing power amplifier circuits. If these substrate materials or VGF-derived products are successfully developed and semiconductor device manufacturers adopt them, demand for our GaAs substrates could decline and our revenue could suffer.
The development of new products can be a highly complex process, and we may experience delays in developing and introducing new products. Any significant delay could cause us to fail to timely introduce and gain market acceptance of new products. Further, the costs involved in researching, developing and engineering new products could be greater than anticipated. If we fail to offer new products or product enhancements or fail to achieve higher quality products, we may not generate sufficient revenue to offset our development costs and other expenses or meet our customers’ requirements.
The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry may limit our ability to maintain or increase net sales and operating results during industry downturns.
The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and periodically experiences significant economic downturns characterized by diminished product demand, resulting in production overcapacity and excess inventory in the markets we serve. A downturn can result in lower unit volumes and rapid erosion of average selling prices. The semiconductor industry has experienced significant downturns, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles of both semiconductor companies’ and their customers’ products or a decline in general economic conditions. This may adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business.
Our continuing business depends in significant part upon manufacturers of electronic and opto-electronic compound semiconductor devices, as well as the current and anticipated market demand for these devices and products using these devices. As a supplier to the compound semiconductor industry, we are subject to the business cycles that characterize the industry. The timing, length and volatility of these cycles are difficult to predict. The compound semiconductor industry has historically been cyclical due to sudden changes in demand, the amount of manufacturing capacity and changes in the technology employed in compound semiconductors. The rate of changes in demand, including end demand, is high, and the effect of these changes upon us occurs quickly, exacerbating the volatility of these cycles. These changes have affected the timing and amounts of customers’ purchases and investments in new technology. These industry cycles create pressure on our revenue, gross margin and net income.
Our industry has in the past experienced periods of oversupply and is currently experiencing a period of oversupply that result in significantly reduced demand and prices for compound semiconductor devices and components, including our products, both as a result of general economic changes and overcapacity. When these periods occur and our operating results and financial condition are adversely affected, oversupply causes greater price competition and can cause our revenue, gross margins and net income to decline. Inventory buildups in telecommunications products and slower than expected sales of computer equipment resulted in overcapacity and led to reduced sales by our customers, and therefore reduced purchases of our products in 2013. During periods of weak demand such as those experienced historically, customers typically reduce purchases, delay delivery of products and/or cancel orders of component parts such as our products. In 2013, we experienced cancellations, price reductions, delays and push-outs of orders, whichfuture. Competitive pressures have resulted in reduced revenue. Further order cancellations, reductions in order size or delays in orders could occur and would materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. Actions to reduce our costs may be insufficient to align our structure with prevailing business conditions. We may be required to undertake additional cost-cutting measures, and may be unable to invest in marketing, research and development and engineering at the levels we believe are necessary to maintain our competitive position. Our failure to make these investments could seriously harm our business.
13

We base our planned operating expenses in part on our expectations of future revenue, and a significant portion of our expenses is relatively fixed in the short term. If revenue for a particular quarter is lower than we expect, we likely will be unable to proportionately reduce our operating expenses for that quarter, which would harm our operating results for that quarter. In 2013, we experienced significantly declining gross margins due to the allocation of fixed costs across a lower volume of sales than anticipated.
Our results of operations may suffer if we do not effectively manage our inventory.
We must manage our inventory of component parts, work-in-process and finished goods effectively to meet changing customer requirements, while keeping inventory costs down and improving gross margins. Someprices of our products, and suppliescontinued or increased competition could reduce our market share, require us to further reduce the prices of our products, affect our ability to recover costs and result in reduced gross margins.

11

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, new competitors have in the past and may continue to emerge, such as a crystal growing company established by a former employee in China that is supplying semi-conducting GaAs wafers to the future become obsolete while in inventory dueLED market. Competition from sources such as this could increase, particularly if these competitors are able to changing customer specifications, or become excess inventory due to decreased demand for our products and an inability to sell the inventory within a foreseeable period. Furthermore, if current costs of production increase or sales prices drop below the standard prices at which we value inventory, we may need to take a charge for a reduction in inventory values. We have in the past had to take inventory valuation and impairment charges. Any future unexpected changes in demand or increases in costs of production that cause us to take additional charges for un-saleable, obsolete or excess inventory, or to reduce inventory values, could adversely affect our results of operations.

obtain large capital investments.

If we have low product yields, the shipment of our products may be delayed and our product cost and operating results may be adversely impacted.

A critical factor in our product cost is yield. Our products are manufactured using complex technologies, and the number of usable substrates we produce can fluctuate as a result of many factors, including:

impurities in the materials used;
contamination of the manufacturing environment;
quality control and inconsistency in quality levels;
lack of automation and inconsistent processing resulting from manual manufacturing steps;
substrate breakage;breakage during the manufacturing process;
equipment failure, power outages or variations in the manufacturing process; and
performance of personnel involved in the manufacturing process.

In addition, we may modify our process to meet a customer specification but this can impact our yield. If our yields decrease, our revenue could decline if we are unable to produce needed product on time.to our customers’ requirements. At the same time, our manufacturing costs could remain fixed, or could increase. We have experienced product shipment delays and difficulties in achieving acceptable yields on both new and older products, and delays and poor yields have adversely affected our operating results. We may experience similar problems in the future and we cannot predict when they may occur or their duration or severity. In particular, many of our manufacturing processes are new and are still being refined, which can result in lower yields.

If our manufacturing processes result in defects in our products making them unfit for use by our customers, our products would be rejected, resulting in compensation costs paid to our customers, and possible disqualification. This could lead to revenue loss and market share loss.

Intense competition in the markets for our products could prevent us from increasing revenue and sustaining profitability.
The markets for our products are intensely competitive. We face competition for our substrate products from other manufacturers of substrates, such as Freiberger Compound Materials, Hitachi Cable, Sumitomo Electric Industries and CCTC in China, from semiconductor device manufacturers that produce substrates for their own use, and from companies, such as TriQuint Semiconductors, RFMD and Skyworks that are actively developing alternative materials to GaAs and marketing semiconductor devices using these alternative materials. We believe that at least two of our major competitors are shipping high volumes of GaAs substrates manufactured using a technique similar to our VGF technique. Other competitors may develop and begin using similar technology. If we are unable to compete effectively, our revenue may not increase and we may be unable to remain profitable. We face many competitors that have a number of significant advantages over us, including:
greater experience in the business;
more manufacturing experience;
extensive intellectual property;
broader name recognition; and
significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources.
Our competitors could develop new or enhanced products that are more effective than our products.
The level and intensity of competition has increased over the past year and we expect competition to continue to increase in the future. Competitive pressures caused by the current economic conditions have resulted in reductions in the prices of our products, and continued or increased competition could reduce our market share, require us to further reduce the prices of our products, affect our ability to recover costs and result in reduced gross margins.
In addition, new competitors have and may continue to emerge, such as a crystal growing company established by a former employee in China that is supplying semi-conducting GaAs wafers to the LED market. Competition from sources such as this could increase, particularly if these competitors are able to obtain large capital investments.
The Chinese government has previously imposed manufacturing restrictions that, if imposed again in the future on our facilities, could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and our financial condition.
The Chinese government has in the past imposed restrictions on manufacturing facilities, such as the restrictions imposed on polluting factories for the 2008 Olympics and Paralympics, including a shut-down of transportation of materials and power plants to reduce air pollution. If, in the future, restrictions are imposed on our operations, our ability to meet customer demand or supply current or new orders would be significantly impacted. Customers could then be required to purchase product from our competitors, causing our competitors to take market share from us, and could result in our customers supplying future needs from our competitors. Restrictions on transportation of materials could limit our ability to transport our product, and could result in bottlenecks at shipping ports, limiting our ability to deliver products to our customers. During periods of such restrictions, we may increase our stock of critical materials (such as arsenic, gallium, and other chemicals) for use during the period that these restrictions are likely to last, which will increase our use of cash and increase our inventory level, such as occurred during 2008. Any of these restrictions could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and our financial condition.
Demand for our products may decrease if our customers experience difficulty manufacturing, marketing or selling their products.
Our products are used as components in our customers’ products. Accordingly, demand for our products is subject to factors affecting the ability of our customers to introduce and market their products successfully, including:
the competition our customers face in their particular industries;
the technical, manufacturing, sales and marketing and management capabilities of our customers;
the financial and other resources of our customers; and
the inability of our customers to sell their products if they infringe third‑party intellectual property rights.
If demand for the end-user applications for which our products are used decreases, or our customers are unable to develop, market and sell their products, demand for our products will decrease.
The financial condition of our customers may affect their ability to pay amounts owed to us.
Many of our customers are facing business downturns that have reduced their cash balances and their prospects. We frequently allow our customers extended payment terms after shipping products to them. Subsequent to our shipping a product, some customers have been unable to make payments when due, reducing our cash balances and causing us to incur charges to allow for a possibility that some accounts might not be paid. Customers may also be forced to file for bankruptcy. If our customers do not pay their accounts when due, we will be required to incur charges that would reduce our earnings.
We purchase critical raw materials and parts for our equipment from single or limited sources, and could lose sales if these sources fail to fill our needs.
We depend on a limited number of suppliers for certain raw materials, components and equipment used in manufacturing our products, including key materials such as quartz tubing and polishing solutions. Although several of these raw materials are purchased from suppliers in which we hold an ownership interest, we generally purchase these materials through standard purchase orders and not pursuant to long-term supply contracts, and no supplier guarantees supply of raw materials or equipment to us. If we lose any of our key suppliers, our manufacturing efforts could be significantly hampered and we could be prevented from timely producing and delivering products to our customers. Prior to investing in our raw material joint ventures, we sometimes experienced delays obtaining critical raw materials and spare parts, including gallium, due to shortages of these materials and we could experience such delays again in the future due to shortages of materials and may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of materials. These shortages and delays could result in higher materials costs and cause us to delay or reduce production of our products. If we have to delay or reduce production, we could fail to meet customer delivery schedules and our revenue and operating results could suffer.
We have made and may continue to make strategic investments in raw materials suppliers, which may not be successful and may result in the loss of all or part of our investment.
We have made investments through our joint ventures in raw material suppliers in China, which provide us with opportunities to gain supplies of key raw materials that are important to our substrate business. These affiliates each have a market beyond that provided by us. We do not have influence over all of these companies and in some we have made only a strategic, minority investment. We may not be successful in achieving the financial, technological or commercial advantage upon which any given investment is premised, and we could end up losing all or part of our investment.
Our substrate products have a long qualification cycle that makes it difficult to plan our expenses and forecast our results.
New customers typically place orders with us for our substrate products three months to a year or more after our initial contact with them. The sale of our products may be subject to delays due to our customers’ lengthy internal budgeting, approval and evaluation processes. During this time, we may incur substantial expenses and expend sales, marketing and management efforts while the customers evaluate our products. These expenditures may not result in sales of our products. If we do not achieve anticipated sales in a period as expected, we may experience an unplanned shortfall in our revenue. As a result, we may not be able to cover expenses, causing our operating results to vary. In addition, if a customer decides not to incorporate our products into its initial design, we may not have another opportunity to sell products to this customer for many months or even years. In the current competitive and economic climate, the average sales cycle for our products has lengthened even further and is expected to continue to make it difficult for us to forecast our future sales accurately. We anticipate that sales of any future substrate products will also have lengthy sales cycles and will, therefore, be subject to risks substantially similar to those inherent in the lengthy sales cycles of our current substrate products.

Problems incurred by our subsidiaries and joint ventures or venture partners could result in a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations.

We have invested in subsidiaries and joint venture operations in China that produce products including 99.99% pure gallium (4N Ga), high purity gallium, arsenic, germanium, germanium dioxide, pyrolytic boron nitride (pBN) crucibles and boron oxide (B2O3). We purchase a portion of the materials produced by these venturescompanies for our use and they sell the remainder of their production to third parties. Our ownership interestand the ownership held by our consolidated subsidiaries in these entities ranges from 20% to 83%. We consolidate the joint venturescompanies in which we have a majority or controlling financial interest and employ equity accounting for the joint ventures in which we have a smaller ownership interest. Several of these joint ventures occupy space within larger facilities owned and/or operated by one of the other venture partners. Several of these venture partners are engaged in other manufacturing activities at or near the same facility. In some facilities, we share access to certain functions, including water, hazardous waste treatment or air quality treatment. If any of our joint venture partners in any of these ventures experiences problems with its operations, disruptions of our joint venture operations could result, having a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operation of our joint ventures, and correspondingly on our financial condition or results of operations. For example, since gallium is a by-product of aluminum, our gallium joint venture in China, which is housed in and receives services from an affiliated aluminum plant, could generate lower production of gallium as a result of reduced by-product services provided by the aluminum plant. Accordingly, in order to meet customer supply obligations, our joint venture may have to source finished productsmaterials from another independent third party supplier, resulting in reduced gross margin.

In addition, if any of our joint ventures or venture partners with which our joint ventures share facilities is deemed to have violated applicable laws, rules or regulations governing the use, storage, discharge or disposal of hazardous chemicals during manufacturing, research and development or sales demonstrations, the operations of our joint ventures could be adversely affected and we could be subject to substantial liability for clean-up efforts, personal injury and fines or suspension or cessation of our joint venture operations as a result of the actions of the joint ventures or other venture partners. Employees working for our joint ventures or any of the other venture partners could bring litigation against us as a result of actions taken at the joint venture or venture partner facilities, even

12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

though we are not directly controlling the operations, including actions for exposure to chemicals or other hazardous materials at the facilities of our joint ventures or the facilities of any venture partner that are shared by our joint ventures. While we would expect to defend ourselves vigorously in any litigation that is brought against us, litigation is inherently uncertain and it is possible that our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be affected. Even if we are not deemed responsible for the actions of the joint ventures or venture partners, litigation could be costly, time consuming to defend and divert management attention; in addition, if we are deemed to be the most financially viable of the partners, plaintiffs may decide to pursue us for damages.

We believe that continuing to invest in additional joint ventures will be important to remaining competitive in our marketplace and ensuring a supply of critical raw materials. However, we may not be able to identify complementary joint venture opportunities or, even once opportunities are identified, we may not be able to reach agreement on the terms of the venture with the other venture partners. Additional joint ventures could cause us to incur contingent liabilities or other expenses, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

Since all of our joint venture activity is expected to occuroccurs in China, these activities could subject us to a number of risks associated with conducting operations internationally, including:

difficulties in managing geographically disparate operations;
difficulties in enforcing agreements through non-U.S. legal systems;
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements that may limit our ability to export the venture products or sell into particular jurisdictions or impose multiple conflicting tax laws and regulations;
political and economic instability, civil unrest or war;
terrorist activities that impact international commerce;
difficulties in protecting our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws and practices do not protect proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws and practices of the United States;
changing laws and policies affecting economic liberalization, foreign investment, currency convertibility or exchange rates, taxation or employment; and
nationalization of foreign‑foreign owned assets, including intellectual property.
The effect of terrorist threats and actions on the general economy could decrease our revenue.
The United States continues to be on alert for terrorist activity. The potential near- and long-term impact terrorist activities may have in regards to our suppliers, customers and markets

Demand for our products may decrease if demand for the end-user applications decrease or if manufacturers downstream in our supply chain experience difficulty manufacturing, marketing or selling their products.

Our products are used as components in electronic products. Accordingly, demand for our products is subject to the demand for end-user applications which utilize our products, as well as factors affecting the ability of the manufacturers downstream in our supply chain to introduce and market their products successfully, including:

the U.S. economycompetition such manufacturers face in their particular industries;
the technical, manufacturing, sales and marketing and management capabilities of such manufacturers;
the financial and other resources of such manufacturers; and
the inability of such manufacturers to sell their products if they infringe third party intellectual property rights.

If demand for the end-user applications for which our products are used decreases, or if manufacturers downstream in our supply chain are unable to develop, market and sell their products, demand for our products will decrease.

The average selling prices of our products may decline over relatively short periods, which may reduce our gross margins.

The market for our products is uncertain. Therecharacterized by declining average selling prices resulting from factors such as increased competition, overcapacity, the introduction of new products and decreased sales of products incorporating our products and as a result average selling prices for our products may be embargos of ports or products, or destruction of shipments or our facilities, or attacks that affect our personnel. Theredecline over relatively short time periods. We have in the past experienced, and in the future may be other potentially adverse effects on ourexperience, substantial period-to-period fluctuations in operating results due to declining average selling prices. On average, for the year ended December 31, 2014 we experienced average selling price declines of approximately 5% to 10% depending on the product. It is possible that the pace of average selling price declines could accelerate beyond these levels for certain products in a commoditizing market. We anticipate that average selling prices will decrease in the future in response to the unstable demand environment, product introductions by competitors or us, or by other factors, including pricing pressures from significant eventscustomers. When our average selling prices decline, our gross profits decline unless we are able to

13

TABLE OF CONTENTS

sell more products or reduce the cost to manufacture our products. We generally attempt to combat average selling price declines by improving yields, manufacturing efficiency and working to reduce the costs of our raw materials and of manufacturing our products. We have in the past and may in the future experience declining sales prices, which could negatively impact our revenues, gross profits and financial results. We therefore need to sell our current products in increasing volumes to offset any decline in their average selling prices, and introduce new products, which we may not be able to do, or do on a timely basis.

We may be unable to reduce the cost of our products sufficiently to enable us to compete with others. Our cost reduction efforts may not allow us to keep pace with competitive pricing pressures and could adversely affect our margins. In order to remain competitive, we must continually reduce the cost of manufacturing our products through design and engineering changes. We cannot assure you that any changes effected by us will result in sufficient cost reductions to allow us to reduce the price of our products to remain competitive or improve our gross margins.

Defects in our products could diminish demand for our products.

Our products are complex and may contain defects, including defects resulting from impurities inherent in our raw materials or inconsistencies in our manufacturing processes. We have experienced quality control problems with some of our products, which caused customers to return products to us, reduce orders for our products, or both. We believe that we cannot foresee. Sincecontinue to experience certain reduction in orders as a result of product quality issues. If we performcontinue to experience quality control problems, or experience these or other problems in new products, customers may cancel or reduce orders or purchase products from our competitors and we may be unable to maintain or increase sales to our customers and sales of our products could decline. Defects in our products could cause us to incur higher manufacturing costs and suffer product returns and additional service expenses, all of which could adversely impact our operating results.

If new products developed by us contain defects when released, our customers may be dissatisfied and we may suffer negative publicity or customer claims against us, lose sales or experience delays in market acceptance of our new products.

The Chinese government has previously imposed manufacturing restrictions that, if imposed again in the future, could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and our financial condition.

The Chinese government has in China,the past imposed restrictions on manufacturing facilities, such as the restrictions imposed on polluting factories for the 2008 Olympics and the 2014 APEC event, including a shut-down of transportation of materials and power plants to reduce air pollution. If, in the future, restrictions are imposed that include our operations, our ability to supply current or new orders would be significantly impacted. Customers could then be required to purchase product from our competitors, causing our competitors to take market share from us. Restrictions on transportation of materials could limit our ability to transport our raw materials or products, and could result in bottlenecks at shipping ports, limiting our ability to deliver products to our customers. During periods of such restrictions, we may increase our stock of critical materials (such as arsenic, gallium, and other chemicals) for use during the period that these restrictions are likely to last, which will increase our use of cash and increase our inventory level, such as occurred during 2008. Any of these restrictions could materially and adversely impact our results of operations and our financial condition.

To reduce pollution in Beijing, the Chinese government has sometimes limited the addition or expansion of facilities by manufacturing companies in the Beijing area. If the government applied restrictions on us it could have an adverse impact on our results of operations and our financial condition.

The loss of one or more of our key substrate customers would significantly hurt our operating results.

Although no customer represented more than 10% of our revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2014, we expect that a significant portion of our future revenue will continue to be derived from a limited number of substrate customers. Most of our customers are not obligated to purchase a specified quantity of our products or to provide us with binding forecasts of product purchases. In addition, our customers may reduce, delay or cancel orders at any time without any significant penalty. In the past, we have experienced slower bookings, significant push-outs and cancellation of orders from customers. If we lose a major customer or if a customer cancels, reduces or delays orders, or reduces the prices paid for our products, our revenue would decline. In addition, customers that have accounted for significant revenue in the past may not continue to generate revenue for us in any future period. Any delay in scheduled shipments of our products could cause revenue to fall below our expectations and the expectations of market analysts or investors, causing our stock price to decline.

14

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The cyclical nature of the semiconductor industry may limit our ability to maintain or increase net sales and operating results during industry downturns.

The semiconductor industry is highly cyclical and periodically experiences significant economic downturns characterized by diminished product demand, resulting in production overcapacity and excess inventory in the markets we serve. A downturn can result in lower unit volumes and rapid erosion of average selling prices. The semiconductor industry has experienced significant downturns, often in connection with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles of both semiconductor companies’ and their customers’ products or a decline in general economic conditions. This may adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business.

Our continuing business depends in significant part upon manufacturers of electronic and opto-electronic compound semiconductor devices, as well as the current and anticipated market demand for these devices and products using these devices. As a supplier to the compound semiconductor industry, we are subject to the business cycles that characterize the industry. The timing, length and volatility of these cycles are difficult to predict. The compound semiconductor industry has historically been cyclical due to sudden changes in demand, the amount of manufacturing capacity and changes in the technology employed in compound semiconductors. The rate of changes in demand, including end demand, is high, and the effect of these changes upon us occurs quickly, exacerbating the volatility of these cycles. These changes have affected the timing and amounts of customers’ purchases and investments in new technology. These industry cycles create pressure on our revenue, gross margin and net income.

Our industry has in the past experienced periods of oversupply and that has resulted in significantly reduced prices for compound semiconductor devices and components, including our products, both as a result of general economic changes and overcapacity. When this occurs our operating results and financial condition are adversely affected. Oversupply causes greater price competition and can cause our revenue, gross margins and net income to decline. During periods of weak demand, customers typically reduce purchases, delay delivery of products and/or cancel orders of component parts such as our products. Further order cancellations, reductions in order size or delays in orders could occur and would materially adversely affect our business and results of operations. Actions to reduce our costs may be insufficient to align our structure with prevailing business conditions. We may be required to undertake additional cost-cutting measures, and may be unable to invest in marketing, research and development and engineering at the levels we believe are necessary to maintain our competitive position. Our failure to make these investments could seriously harm our business.

We base our planned operating expenses in part on our expectations of future revenue, and a significant portion of our expense is relatively fixed. If revenue for a particular quarter is lower than we expect, we likely will be unable to proportionately reduce our operating expenses for that quarter, which would harm our operating results. For example, in 2013, we experienced significantly declining gross margins due to the allocation of fixed costs across a lower volume of sales than anticipated.

We purchase critical raw materials and parts for our equipment from single or limited sources, and could lose sales if these sources fail to fill our needs.

We depend on a limited number of suppliers for certain raw materials, components and equipment used in manufacturing our products, including key materials such as quartz tubing from our vendor, Kaide, and polishing solutions. Although several of these raw materials are purchased from suppliers in which we hold an ownership interest, we generally purchase these materials through standard purchase orders and not pursuant to long-term supply contracts, and no supplier guarantees supply of raw materials or equipment to us. If we lose any of our key suppliers, our manufacturing efforts could be significantly hampered and we could be prevented from timely producing and delivering products to our customers. Prior to investing in our subsidiaries and joint ventures, we sometimes experienced delays obtaining critical raw materials and spare parts, including gallium, due to shortages of these materials and we could experience such delays again in the future due to shortages of materials and may be unable to obtain an adequate supply of materials. These shortages and delays could result in higher materials costs and cause us to delay or reduce production of our products. If we have to delay or reduce production, we could fail to meet customer delivery schedules and our revenue and operating results could suffer.

If we do not successfully develop new products to respond to rapidly changing customer requirements, our ability to generate revenue, obtain new customers, and retain existing customers may suffer.

Our success depends on our ability to offer new products and product features that incorporate leading technology and respond to technological advances. In addition, our new products must meet customer needs and compete effectively on quality, price and performance. The life cycles of our products are located outsidedifficult to predict. The

15

TABLE OF CONTENTS

markets for our products are characterized by rapid technological change, changing customer needs and evolving industry standards. If our competitors introduce products employing new technologies or performance characteristics, our existing products could become obsolete and unmarketable. During the past few years, we have seen our competitors selling more substrates manufactured using a crystal growth technology similar to ours, which has eroded our technological differentiation.

The development of new products can be a highly complex process, and we may experience delays in developing and introducing new products. Any significant delay could cause us to fail to timely introduce and gain market acceptance of new products. Further, the costs involved in researching, developing and engineering new products could be greater than anticipated. If we fail to offer new products or product enhancements or fail to achieve higher quality products, we may not generate sufficient revenue to offset our development costs and other expenses or meet our customers’ requirements.

Our substrate products have a long qualification cycle that makes it difficult to plan our expenses and forecast our results.

New customers typically place orders with us for our substrate products three months to a year or more after our initial contact with them. The sale of our products may be subject to delays due to our customers’ lengthy internal approval and evaluation processes. During this time, we may incur substantial expenses and expend sales, marketing and management efforts while the customers evaluate our products. These expenditures may not result in sales of our products. If we do not achieve anticipated sales in a period as expected, we may experience an unplanned shortfall in our revenue. As a result, we may not be able to cover expenses, causing our operating results to be adversely effected. In addition, if we fail to meet the product qualification requirements of the United States, terrorist activitycustomer, we may not have another opportunity to sell products to this customer for many months or threats against U.S.‑owned enterprise are a particular concerneven years. In the current competitive climate, the average qualification and sales cycle for our products has lengthened even further and is expected to us.

continue to make it difficult for us to forecast our future sales accurately. We anticipate that sales of any future substrate products will also have lengthy sales cycles and will, therefore, be subject to risks substantially similar to those inherent in the lengthy sales cycles of our current substrate products.

If any of our facilities isare damaged by occurrences such as fire, explosion or natural disaster, we might not be able to manufacture our products.

The ongoing operation of our manufacturing and production facilities in China is critical to our ability to meet demand for our products. If we are not able to use all or a significant portion of our facilities for prolonged periods for any reason, we would not be able to manufacture products for our customers. For example, a fire or explosion caused by our use of combustible chemicals and high temperatures during our manufacturing processes or power interruption caused by severe weather situationconditions could render some or all of our facilities inoperable for an indefinite period of time. Actions outside of our control, such as earthquakes or other natural disasters, could also damage our facilities, rendering them inoperable. If we are unable to operate our facilities and manufacture our products, we would lose customers and revenue and our business would be harmed.

17

our customers may affect their ability to pay amounts owed to us.

Many of our customers are undercapitalized and cope with cash flow issues. We frequently allow our customers extended payment terms after shipping products to them. Subsequent to our shipping a product, some customers have been unable to make payments when due, reducing our cash balances and causing us to incur charges to allow for a possibility that some accounts might not be paid. Customers may also be forced to file for bankruptcy. If our customers do not pay their accounts we will be required to incur charges that would reduce our earnings.

We have made and may continue to make strategic investments in raw materials suppliers, which may not be successful and may result in the loss of all or part of our investment.

We have made investments through our subsidiaries and joint ventures in raw material suppliers in China, which provide us with opportunities to gain supplies of key raw materials that are important to our substrate business. These affiliates each have a market beyond that provided by us. We do not have influence over all of these companies and in some we have made only a strategic, minority investment. We may not be successful in achieving the financial, technological or commercial advantage upon which any given investment is premised, and we could end up losing all or part of our investment.

16

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We depend on the continuing efforts of our senior management team and other key personnel. If we lose members of our senior management team or other key personnel, or are unable to successfully, retain, recruit and train qualified personnel, our ability to manufacture and sell our products could be harmed.

Our future success depends on the continuing services of members of our senior management team and other key personnel. Our industry is characterized by high demand and intense competition for talent, and the turnover rate can be high. We compete for qualified management and other personnel with other semiconductor companies. Our employees could leave our company with little or no prior notice and would be free to work for a competitor. If one or more of our senior executives or other key personnel were unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we may not be able to replace them easily or at all, and other senior management may be required to divert attention from other aspects of the business. The loss of any of these individuals or our ability to attract or retain qualified personnel could adversely affect our business. Raymond Low,

Our results of operations may suffer if we do not effectively manage our former Chief inventory.

We must manage our inventory of raw materials, work-in-process and finished goods effectively to meet changing customer requirements, while keeping inventory costs down and improving gross margins. Although we seek to maintain sufficient inventory levels of certain materials to guard against interruptions in supply and to meet our near term needs, and have to date been able to obtain sufficient supplies of materials in a timely manner, in the future, we may experience shortages of certain key materials. Some of our products and supplies have in the past and may in the future become obsolete while in inventory due to changing customer specifications, or become excess inventory due to decreased demand for our products and an inability to sell the inventory within a foreseeable period. Furthermore, if market prices drop below the prices at which we value inventory, we may need to take a charge for a reduction in inventory values. We have in the past had to take inventory valuation and impairment charges. Any future unexpected changes in demand or increases in costs of production that cause us to take additional charges for un-saleable, obsolete or excess inventory, or to reduce inventory values, could adversely affect our results of operations.

Financial Officer, has recently resignedmarket volatility and adverse changes in the domestic and global economic environment could have a significant adverse impact on our business, financial condition and operating results.

We are subject to the risks arising from adverse changes and uncertainty in domestic and global economies. Uncertain global economic conditions and low or negative growth in China, Europe and the United States, along with volatility in the financial markets, increasing national debt and fiscal concerns in various regions, pose challenges to our industry. Although we remain well-capitalized, the cost and availability of funds may be adversely affected by illiquid credit markets. Turbulence in U.S. and international markets and economies may adversely affect our liquidity, financial condition and profitability. Another severe or prolonged economic downturn could result in a variety of risks to our business, including:

increased volatility in our stock price;
increased volatility in foreign currency exchange rates;
delays in, or curtailment of, purchasing decisions by our customers or potential customers either as a result of overall economic uncertainty or as a result of their inability to access the liquidity necessary to engage in purchasing initiatives;
increased credit risk associated with our customers or potential customers, particularly those that may operate in industries most affected by the economic downturn; and
impairment of our intangible or other assets.

In the recent past we experienced delays in customer purchasing decisions and disruptions in normal volume of customer orders that we believe were in part due to the uncertainties in the global economy and an adverse impact on consumer spending. During challenging and uncertain economic times and in tight credit markets, many customers delay or reduce technology purchases. Should similar events occur again, our business and operating results could be significantly and adversely affected.

Global economic conditions may have an impact on our business and financial condition in ways that we currently cannot predict.

Our operations and financial results depend on worldwide economic conditions and their impact on levels of business spending, which had deteriorated significantly in many countries and regions in previous years.

17

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Uncertainties in the financial and credit markets may cause our customers to postpone deliveries of ordered systems and placement of new orders and extended uncertainties may reduce future sales of our products and services. The revenue growth and profitability of our business depends on the overall demand for our substrates, and we are currently actively searchingparticularly dependent on the market conditions for the wireless, solid state illumination, fiber optics and telecommunications industries. Because the end users of our products are primarily large companies whose businesses fluctuate with general economic and business conditions, a new Chief Financial Officer. 

softening of demand for products that use our substrates, caused by a weakening economy, may result in decreased revenue. Customers may find themselves facing excess inventory from earlier purchases, and may defer or reconsider purchasing products due to the downturn in their business and in the general economy. If market conditions deteriorate, we may experience increased collection times and greater write-offs, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our profitability and our cash flow.

Future tightening of credit markets and concerns regarding the availability of credit may make it more difficult for our customers to raise capital, whether debt or equity, to finance their purchases of capital equipment or of the products we sell. Delays in our customers’ ability to obtain such financing, or the unavailability of such financing, would adversely affect our product sales and revenues and therefore harm our business and operating results. We cannot predict the timing, duration of or effect on our business of any future economic downturn or the timing or strength of any subsequent recovery.

We may not be able to identify additional complementary joint ventures.

We believe that continuing to invest in additional joint ventures will be important to remaining competitive in our marketplace and ensuring a supply of critical raw materials. However, we may not be able to identify additional complementary joint venture opportunities or, even once opportunities are identified, we may not be able to reach agreement on the terms of the venture with the other venture partners. Additional joint ventures could cause us to incur contingent liabilities or other expenses, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results.

The effect of terrorist threats and actions on the general economy could decrease our revenue.

Developed countries such as the United States and China continue to be on alert for terrorist activity. The potential near- and long-term impact terrorist activities may have in regards to our suppliers, customers and markets for our products and the economy is uncertain. There may be embargos of ports or products, or destruction of shipments or our facilities, or attacks that affect our personnel. There may be other potentially adverse effects on our operating results due to significant events that we cannot foresee. Since we perform all of our manufacturing operations in China, terrorist activity or threats against U.S.-owned enterprises are a particular concern to us.

Risks Related to International Aspects of Our Business

Changes in tariffs, import restrictions, export restrictions Chinese regulations or other trade barriers may reduce gross margins.
We may incur increases in costs due to changes in tariffs, import or export restrictions, or other trade barriers, or unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, any of which could reduce our gross margins. For example, in July 2012, we received notice of retroactive value-added taxes (VATs) levied by the tax authorities in the PRC which applied for the period from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012.  We expensed the retroactive VATs of approximately $1.3 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2012, which resulted in a 505 basis point decrease in our gross margins. Tax authorities in the PRC revised tax regulations and levied VAT on materials imported not forming part of the final product as foreign-owned enterprises. These VATs will continue to negatively impact our gross margins for the future quarters. Given the relatively fluid regulatory environment in the PRC, there could be additional tax or other regulatory changes in the future. Any such changes could directly and materially adversely impact our financial results and general business condition.
Our operating results depend in large part on continued customer acceptance of our substrate products manufactured in China and continued improvements in product quality.
We manufacture all of our products in China, and source most of our raw materials in China. Accordingly, we continue to seek customer qualification of our China‑manufactured products. In addition, we have in the past experienced quality problems with our China‑manufactured products. Our previous quality problems caused us to lose market share to our competitors, as some customers reduced their orders from us until our surface quality was as good and consistent as that offered by competitors and customers allocated their requirements for compound semiconductor substrates across more of our competitors. If we are unable to continue to achieve customer qualifications for our products, or if continue to experience quality problems, customers may not increase purchases of our products, our China facility will become underutilized, and we will be unable to achieve expected revenue growth. In addition, in early 2012, we entered into an arrangement to establish a second manufacturing facility in China, which if completed will further our reliance on Chinese manufacturing facilities.  We may again lose sales of our products to competitors and experience loss of market share. If we are unable to recover and retain our market share, we may be unable to grow our business.

We derive a significant portion of our revenue from international sales, and our ability to sustain and increase our international sales involves significant risks.

Our revenue growth depends in part on the expansion of our international sales and operations. International sales represented 88%, of our revenue in 2014 and 2013 and 83% and 80%of our total revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.in 2012. We expect that sales to customers outside the United States, particularly sales to customers in Asia,Japan, Taiwan and China, will continue to represent a significant portion of our revenue.

Currently, a significant percentage of our salesrevenue is to customers headquartered in Asia. All of our manufacturing facilities and somemost of our suppliers are also located outside the U.S.United States. Managing our overseas operations presents challenges, including periodic regional economic downturns, trade balance issues, varying business conditions and demands, political instability, variations in enforcement of intellectual property and contract rights in different jurisdictions, differences in the ability to develop relationships with suppliers and other local businesses, changes in U.S. and international laws and regulations including U.S. export restrictions, fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates, the ability to provide sufficient levels of technical support in different locations, cultural differences, shipping delays and terrorist acts or acts of war, among other risks. Many of these challenges are present in China, which represents a large potential market for semiconductor devices and where we anticipate significant opportunity for growth.devices. Global uncertainties with respect to: (i) economic growth rates in various countries; (ii) sustainability of demand for electronics products; (iii) capital spending by semiconductor manufacturers; (iv) price weakness for certain semiconductor devices; and (v) political instability in regions where we have operations may also affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

18

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our dependence on international sales involves a number of risks, including:

changes in tariffs, import restrictions, export restrictions, or other trade barriers;
unexpected changes in regulatory requirements;
longer periods to collect accounts receivable;
changes in export license requirements;
political and economic instability;
unexpected changes in diplomatic and trade relationships; and
foreign exchange rate fluctuations.

Our sales are denominated in U.S. dollars, except for sales to our Chinese customers which are denominated in Renminbi and our Japanese customers which are denominated in Japanese yen. Thus, increasesIncreases in the value of the U.S. dollar could increase the price of our products in non-U.S. markets and make our products more expensive than competitors’ products in these markets.

Also, denominating

Denominating some sales in Japanese yen subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Japanese yen. For example, in the second half of 2014, the exchange rate of Japanese yen to U.S. dollar moved from 101.55 to 119.95 from June 30, 2014 to December 31, 2014. We incurred foreign currency transaction exchange losses which are included in “other income (expense), net” on the consolidated statements of operations of $1.0 million, $1.3 million and $445,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 respectively. The functional currency of our Chinese subsidiary and joint ventures is the local currency. We incur transaction gains or losses resulting from consolidation of expenses incurred in local currencies for these entities, as well as in translation of the assets and liabilities of their assets at each balance sheet date. If we do not effectively manage the risks associated with international sales, our revenue, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Changes in tariffs, import or export restrictions, Chinese regulations or other trade barriers may reduce gross margins.

We may incur increases in costs due to changes in tariffs, import or export restrictions, or other trade barriers, unexpected changes in regulatory requirements, any of which could reduce our gross margins. For example, in July 2012, we received notice of retroactive value-added taxes (VATs) levied by the tax authorities in China which applied for the period from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. We expensed the retroactive VATs of approximately $1.3 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2012, which resulted in a decrease in our gross margins. These VATs will continue to negatively impact our gross margins for the future quarters. Given the relatively fluid regulatory environment in China, there could be additional tax or other regulatory changes in the future. Any such changes could directly and materially adversely impact our financial results and general business condition.

Our operating results depend in large part on continued customer acceptance of our substrate products manufactured in China and continued improvements in product quality.

We manufacture all of our products in China, and source most of our raw materials in China. We have in the past experienced quality problems with our China-manufactured products. Our previous quality problems caused us to lose market share to our competitors, as some customers reduced their orders from us until our surface quality was as good and consistent as that offered by competitors and instead allocated their requirements for compound semiconductor substrates to our competitors. If we are unable to continue to achieve customer qualifications for our products, or if we continue to experience quality problems, customers may not increase purchases of our products, our China facility will become underutilized, and we will be unable to achieve revenue growth.

Changes in China’s political, social and economic environment may affect our financial performance.

Our financial performance may be affected by changes in China’s political, social and economic environment. The role of the Chinese central and local governments in the Chinese economy is significant. Chinese policies toward economic liberalization, and laws and policies affecting technology companies, foreign investment, currency exchange rates, taxation structure and other matters could change, resulting in greater restrictions on our ability to do business and operate our manufacturing facilities in China. Any imposition of surcharges or any increase in Chinese tax rates or reduction or elimination of Chinese tax benefits could hurt our operating results. The Chinese

19

TABLE OF CONTENTS

government could revoke, terminate or suspend our operating license for national security and similar reasons without compensation to us. If the Chinese government were to take any of these actions, we would be prevented from conducting all or part of our business. Any failure on our part to comply with governmental regulations could result in the loss of our ability to manufacture our products in China.

If there are power shortages in the PRC,China, we may have to temporarily close our China operations, which would adversely impact our ability to manufacture our products and meet customer orders, and would result in reduced revenue.

In the past, the Chinese governmentChina has faced a power shortageshortages resulting in power demand outstripping supply in peak periods. Instability in electrical supply in past years has caused sporadic outages among residential and commercial consumers causing the Chinese government to implement tough measures to ease the energy shortage. If further problems with power shortages occur in the future, we aremay be required to make temporary closures of our subsidiary and joint venture operations, weoperations. We may be unable to manufacture our products and would then be unable to meet customer orders except from inventory on hand. As a result, our revenue could be adversely impacted, and our relationships with our customers could suffer, impacting our ability to generate future revenue. In addition, if power is shut off at the facilities for our Beijing subsidiaryChina joint ventures at any time, either voluntarily or as a result of unplanned brownouts, during certain phases of our manufacturing process including our crystal growth phase, the work in process may be ruined and rendered unusable, causing us to incur expensecosts that will not be covered by revenue, and negatively impacting our cost of revenue and gross margins.

An outbreak of a contagious disease such as Ebola, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) or the Avian Flu may adversely impact our manufacturing operations and some of our key suppliers and customers.

Any reoccurrence of SARS or an outbreak of a contagious disease, such as Avian Flu, or Ebola, may cause us to temporarily close our manufacturing operations. Similarly, if one or more of our key suppliers is required to close for an extended period, we might not have enough raw material inventories to continue manufacturing operations. In addition, while we possess management skills among our China staff that enable us to maintain our manufacturing operations with minimal on-site supervision from our U.S.‑basedU.S.-based staff, our business could also be harmed if travel to or from AsiaChina and the United States is restricted or inadvisable. If our manufacturing operations were closed for a significant period, we could lose revenue and market share, which would depress our financial performance and could be difficult to recapture. Finally, if one of our key customers is required to close for an extended period, we might not be able to ship product to them, our revenue would decline and our financial performance would suffer.

Risks Related to Our Financial Results and Capital Structure

If we fail to manage periodic contractions, we may utilize our cash balances, resulting in the decline of our existing cash, cash equivalents and investment balances.

We anticipate that our existing cash resources will fund our operations and purchases of capital equipment, as well as provide adequate working capital for the next twelve months. However, our liquidity is affected by many factors including, among others, the extent to which we pursue additional capital expenditures, the level of our production, and other factors related to the uncertainties of the industry and global economies. If we fail to manage ourbusiness contractions successfully we may draw down our cash reserves, which would adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, reduce our value and possibly impinge our ability to raise debt and equity funding in the future, at a time when we might be requiredneed to raise additional cash. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that events in the future will not require us to seek additional capital or, if required, that such capital would be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. As part of our effort to reduce costs, we may lose key staff, production resources and technology that we will need to replenish when end markets recover. These events could reduce our ability to grow profitably as markets recover.

If we are not able to fund our capital commitments to expand our facilities in China, our business and operating results may be adversely affected.
We and one of our joint ventures have agreed to invest up to approximately $17.5 million in capital projects at our China facilities, including a manufacturing facility in Tianjin, in the future to expand our manufacturing capabilities to optimize the utilization of our resources.  If we are unable to fund these projects due to an unexpected decrease in our cash reserves or an inability to raise additional funds, our business and operating results may be materially adversely impacted.

Unpredictable fluctuations in our operating results could disappoint analysts or our investors, which could cause our stock price to decline.

We have experienced, and may continue to experience, significant fluctuations in our revenue and earnings. Our quarterly and annual revenue and operating results have varied significantly in the past and may vary significantly in the future due to a number of factors, including:

our ability to develop, manufacture and deliver high quality products in a timely and cost-effective manner;

20

TABLE OF CONTENTS

decline in general economic conditions or downturns in the industry in which we compete;
fluctuations in demand for our products;
expansion of our manufacturing capacity;
expansion of our operations in China;
limited availability and increased cost of raw materials;
the volume and timing of orders from our customers, and cancellations, push-outs and delays of customer orders once made;booked;
fluctuation of our manufacturing yields;
decreases in the prices of our or our competitors’ products;
costs incurred in connection with any future acquisitions of businesses or technologies; and
increases in our expenses, including expenses for research and development.

Due to these factors, we believe that period-to-period comparisons of our operating results may not be meaningful indicators of our future performance.

A substantial percentage of our operating expenses are fixed, in the short term, and we may be unable to adjust spending to compensate for an unexpected shortfall in revenue. As a result, any delay in generating revenue could cause our operating results to befall below the expectations of market analysts or investors, which could also cause our stock price to fall.

decline.

If our operating results and financial performance do not meet the guidance that we have provided to the public, our stock price may decline.

We provide public guidance on our expected operating and financial results for future periods.results. Although we believe that this guidance provides our stockholders, investors and analysts with a better understanding of our expectations for the future, such guidance is comprised of forward-looking statements subject to the risks and uncertainties described in this report and in our other public filings and public statements. Our actual results may not meet the guidance we have provided. If our operating or financial results do not meet our guidance or the expectations of investment analysts, our stock price may decline.

We have adopted certain anti-takeover measures that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

Our board of directors has the authority to issue up to 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock and to determine the price, rights, preferences and privileges of those shares without any further vote or action by the stockholders. The rights of the holders of common stock will be subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of any preferred stock that may be issued in the future. The issuance of shares of preferred stock could have the effect of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock. We have no present intention to issue additional shares of preferred stock.

Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws may have the effect of delaying or preventing a merger, acquisition or change of control, or changes in our management, which could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. The following are some examples of these provisions:

the division of our board of directors into three separate classes, each with three-year terms;
the right of our board to elect a director to fill a space created by a board vacancy or the expansion of the board;
the ability of our board to alter our amended and restated bylaws; and
the requirement that only our board or the holders of at least 10% of our outstanding shares may call a special meeting of our stockholders.

Furthermore, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. These provisions prohibit us from engaging in any business combination with

21

TABLE OF CONTENTS

any interested stockholder (a stockholder who owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock) for a period of three years following the time that such stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless:

662/3% of the shares of voting stock not owned by the interested stockholder approve the merger or combination, or
the board of directors approves the merger or combination or the transaction which resulted in the stockholder becoming an interested stockholder.

Our common stock may be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Select Market, which could negatively impact the price of our common stock and our ability to access the capital markets.

Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Global Select Market. The bid price of our common stock has in the past closed below the $1.00 minimum per share bid price required for continued inclusion on The Nasdaq Global Select Market under Marketplace Rule 5450(a). If the bid price of our common stock remains below $1.00 per share for thirty consecutive business days, we could be subject to delisting from the Nasdaq Global Select Market.

Any delisting from The Nasdaq Global Select Market could have an adverse effect on our business and on the trading of our common stock. If a delisting of our common stock were to occur, our common stock would trade on the OTC Bulletin Board or on the “pink sheets” maintained by the National Quotation Bureau, Inc. Such alternatives are generally considered to be less efficient markets, and our stock price, as well as the liquidity of our common stock, may be adversely impacted as a result. Delisting from The Nasdaq Global Select Market could also have other negative results, including the potential loss of confidence by suppliers and employees, the loss of institutional investor interest and fewer business development opportunities, as well as the loss of liquidity for our stockholders.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

Intellectual property infringement claims may be costly to resolve and could divert management attention.

Other companies may hold or obtain patents on inventions or may otherwise claim proprietary rights to technology necessary to our business. The markets in which we compete are comprised of competitors that in some cases hold substantial patent portfolios covering aspects of products that could be similar to ours. We could become subject to claims that we are infringing patent, trademark, copyright or other proprietary rights of others. For example, weWe have in the past been involved in lawsuits alleging patent infringement, and could in the future be involved in similar litigation.

For example, we entered into a settlement agreement with Sumitomo Electric Industries in 2011 to settle a claim of patent infringement.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, we may lose valuable assets or incur costly litigation.

We rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trademark and trade secret laws, non-disclosure agreements and other intellectual property protection methods to protect our proprietary technology. However, we believe that, due to the rapid pace of technological innovation in the markets for our products, our ability to establish and maintain a position of technology leadership also depends on the skills of our development personnel. Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property, third parties can develop products or processes similar to ours. Our means of protecting our proprietary rights may not be adequate, and our competitors may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products or design around our patents. We believe that at least two of our competitors have begun to ship GaAs substrates produced using a process similar to our VGF technique.process. Our competitors may also develop and patent improvements to the VGF technology upon which we rely, and thus may limit any exclusivity we enjoy by virtue of our patents or trade secrets.

It is possible that pending or future United States or foreign patent applications made by us will not be approved, that our issued patents will not protect our intellectual property, or that third parties will challenge our ownership rights or the validity of our patents. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries may not protect our proprietary rights to as great an extent as do the laws of the United States and it may be more difficult to monitor the use of our intellectual property. Our competitors may be able to legitimately ascertain non-patented proprietary technology embedded in our systems. If this occurs, we may not be able to prevent the development of technology substantially similar to ours.

We may have to resort to costly litigation to enforce our intellectual property rights, to protect our trade secrets or know-how or to determine their scope, validity or enforceability. Enforcing or defending our proprietary

22

TABLE OF CONTENTS

technology is expensive, could cause us to divert resources and may not prove successful. Our protective measures may prove inadequate to protect our proprietary rights, and if we fail to enforce or protect our rights, we could lose valuable assets.

Risks Related to Compliance and Other Legal Matters

We need to continue to improve or implement our systems, procedures and controls.

The shift of our manufacturing

Our operations toin China and growth ofour efforts to grow our business has placed and continues to place a significant strain on our operations and management resources. We have upgraded our inventory control systems, but continue to rely on certain manual processes in our operations and in connection with consolidation of our financial results. If we fail to manage these operations or fail to effectively manage a transition from manual processes to automated processes, effectively, our operations may be disrupted.

To manage our business effectively, we may need to implement additional and improved management information systems, further develop our operating, administrative, financial and accounting systems and controls, add experienced senior level managers, and maintain close coordination among our executive, engineering, accounting, marketing, sales and operations organizations.

We are subject to internal control evaluations and attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes‑OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we must include in our Annual Report on Form 10-K a report of management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Ongoing compliance with this requirement is complex, costly and time-consuming. If: (1) we fail to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting; or (2) our management does not timely assess the adequacy of such internal control, we could be subject to regulatory sanctions and the public’s perception of us may be adversely impacted.

If we fail to comply with environmental and safety regulations, we may be subject to significant fines or forced to cease our operations; in addition, we could be subject to suits for personal injuries caused by hazardous materials.

We are subject to federal, state and local environmental and safety laws and regulations in all of our operating locations, including laws and regulations of China, such as laws and regulations related to the development, manufacture and use of our products, the operation of our facilities, and the use of our real property. These laws and regulations govern the use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous chemicals during manufacturing, research and development, and sales demonstrations. If we fail to comply with applicable regulations, we could be subject to substantial liability for clean-up efforts, personal injury and fines or suspension or be forced to cease our operations, and/or suspend or terminate the development, manufacture or use of certain of our products, the use of our facilities, or the use of our real property, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A

For example, in 2005, a complaint was previously filed against us and two current officers, alleging personal injury, general negligence, intentional tort, wage loss and other damages, including punitive damages, as a result of exposure of plaintiffs to high levels of gallium arsenide in gallium arsenide wafers, and methanol. Other current and/or former employees could bring litigation against us in the future. Although we have put in place engineering, administrative and personnel protective equipment programs to address these issues, our ability to expand or continue to operate our present locations could be restricted or we could be required to acquire costly remediation equipment or incur other significant expenses if we were found liable for failure to comply with environmental and safety regulations. Existing or future changes in laws or regulations in the United States and China may require us to incur significant expenditures or liabilities, or may restrict our operations. In addition, our employees could be exposed to chemicals or other hazardous materials at our facilities and we may be subject to lawsuits seeking damages for wrongful death or personal injuries allegedly caused by exposure to chemicals or hazardous materials at our facilities.

Litigation is inherently uncertain and while we would expect to defend ourselves vigorously, it is possible that our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be affected in any particular period by litigation pending and any additional litigation brought against us. In addition, future litigation could divert management’s attention from our business and operations, causing our business and financial results to suffer. We could incur defense or settlement costs in excess of the insurance covering these litigation matters, or that could result in significant judgments against us or cause us to incur costly settlements, in excess of our insurance limits.

23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2. Properties

Our principal properties as of February 28, 20142015 are as follows:

Location
Square

Feet
Principal Use
Ownership
Fremont, CA20,76719,467AdministrationOperating lease, expires November 20152017
Beijing, China33,000ProductionOwned
Beijing, China34,000ProductionOwned
Beijing, China48,000ProductionOwned
Beijing, China22,000300,000Production and AdministrationOwned by AXT / Tongmei
Beijing, China53,000ProductionOwned
Xianxi, China
56,500ProductionOwned by Beijing Ji YaJiYa Semiconductor Material, Co., Ltd.*
Xianxi, China
7,500AdministrationOwned by Beijing Ji YaJiYa Semiconductor Material, Co., Ltd.*
Beijing, China
2,000AdministrationOperating lease by Beijing Ji YaJiYa Semiconductor Material, Co., Ltd., expires February 20142016
Nanjing, China22,000ProductionOwned by Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd.*
Nanjing, China5,700R&D and AdministrationOwned by Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd.*
Nanjing, China3,900ProductionOwned by Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd.*
Beijing, China
14,720ProductionOwned by Bo Yu Semiconductor Vessel Craftwork Technology Co., Ltd.
Beijing, China7,600
Production and
Administration
Operating leases by Bo Yu Semiconductor Vessel Craftwork Technology Co., Ltd., expire in various terms until June 20142018.


*Joint ventures in which we hold an interest and consolidate in our financial statements. We hold a 46% interest in Beijing Ji YaJiYa Semiconductor Material Co., Ltd., a 83% interest in Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd., and a 70% interest in Beijing BoYu Semiconductor Vessel Craftwork Technology Co., Ltd.

We consider each facility to be in good operating condition and adequate for its present use, and believe that each facility has sufficient plant capacity to meet its current and anticipated operating requirements.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time we may be involved in judicial or administrative proceedings concerning matters arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not expect that any of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows or results of operation.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.


24

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Our common stock has been trading publicly on the NASDAQ Global Market (NASDAQ) under the symbol “AXTI” since May 20, 1998, the date we consummated our initial public offering, and beginning on January 3, 2011, our common stock began trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the same symbol. The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by NASDAQ.

 
 High  Low 
2013 
  
 
First Quarter $3.43  $2.73 
Second Quarter $3.04  $2.50 
Third Quarter $2.86  $2.27 
Fourth Quarter $2.64  $2.10 
2012        
First Quarter $6.84  $4.25 
Second Quarter $6.53  $3.55 
Third Quarter $4.14  $2.75 
Fourth Quarter $3.55  $2.60 

High
Low
2014
 
 
 
 
 
 
First Quarter
$
2.67
 
$
2.20
 
Second Quarter
$
2.32
 
$
2.06
 
Third Quarter
$
3.04
 
$
2.04
 
Fourth Quarter
$
2.88
 
$
2.08
 
2013
First Quarter
$
3.43
 
$
2.73
 
Second Quarter
$
3.04
 
$
2.50
 
Third Quarter
$
2.86
 
$
2.27
 
Fourth Quarter
$
2.64
 
$
2.10
 

As of March 3, 2014,2015, there were 7675 holders of record of our common stock. Because many shares of AXT’s common stock are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of stockholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial owners of our common stock.

We have never paid or declared any cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Dividends accrue on our outstanding Series A preferred stock at the rate of $0.20 per annum per share of Series A preferred stock. The 883,000 shares of $0.001 par value Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding as of both December 31, 20132014 and 20122013 are valued at $3,532,000 and are non-voting and non-convertible preferred stock with a 5.0% cumulative annual dividend rate payable when declared by our board of directors, and $4 per share liquidation preference over common stock, and must be paid before any distribution is made to common stockholders. These preferred shares were issued to Lyte Optronics, Inc. stockholders in connection with the completion of our acquisition of Lyte Optronics, Inc. on May 28, 1999.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On October 27, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up to $5.0 million of our outstanding common stock. These purchases can be made from time to time in the open market and are funded from our existing cash balances and cash generated from operations.

On February 21, 2013, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we maycould repurchase up to $6.0 million of our outstanding common stock through February 27, 2014. TheseThe purchases cancould be made from time to time in the open market and arewere to be funded from our existing cash balances and cash generated from operations. During 2013, we repurchased approximately 285,000 shares at an average price of $2.52 per share for a total purchase price of $716,000 under the stock repurchase program.


As of December 31, 2013, approximately $5.3 million remained available for future repurchases under this program. No shares were repurchased in 2014 under this program and the plan expired on February 27, 2014.

During three months ended December 31, 2013, we repurchased the following shares of our common stock:

Period
 
Total Number
of Shares
Purchased
  
Average Price
Paid Per
Share
  
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as
Part of a Publicly
Announced Plan
or Program(1)
  
Approximate
Dollar Value
of Shares That
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plan or
Program
 
Oct. 1, 2013 through Oct. 31, 2013          $5,712,809 
Nov. 1, 2013 through Nov. 30, 2013  182,106   2.36   182,106   5,283,245 
Dec. 1, 2013 through Dec. 31, 2013           5,283,245 
Total  182,106   2.36   182,106  $5,283,245 
During the year ended December 31, 2012,2014, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock. During the year ended December 31, 2013,2014, we repurchased the followingdid not repurchase any shares of our common stock:
stock.


(1)
Pursuant to a Plan publicly announced on February 25, 2013, in accordance with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to provide for the repurchase of up to $6 million of the Company’s common stock. Repurchases were made from time to time in the open market during the twelve-month period ended February 27, 2014, at prevailing market prices. Repurchases were made under the program using the Company’s own cash resources. As of December 31, 2013, we had 32,604,958 shares of common stock outstanding and 284,878 shares were repurchased in 2013 under this program.

25

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Comparison of Stockholder Return

Set forth below is a line graph comparing the annual percentage change in the cumulative total return to the stockholders of the Company on our common stock with the CRSP Total Return Index for the Nasdaq Stock Market (U.S. Companies) and the Nasdaq Electronic Components Index for the period commencing December 31, 20082009 and ending December 31, 2013.

 
  12/08   12/09   12/10   12/11   12/12   12/13 
AXT, Inc. $100.00  $240.74  $773.33  $308.89  $208.15  $193.33 
NASDAQ Composite $100.00  $144.88  $170.58  $171.30  $199.99  $283.39 
NASDAQ Electronic Components $100.00  $156.84  $178.93  $170.31  $175.62  $235.40 
2014.


12/0912/1012/1112/1212/1312/14
AXT, Inc.
 
100.00
 
 
321.23
 
 
128.31
 
 
86.46
 
 
80.31
 
 
86.15
 
NASDAQ Composite
 
100.00
 
 
117.61
 
 
118.70
 
 
139.00
 
 
196.83
 
 
223.74
 
NASDAQ Electronic Components
 
100.00
 
 
115.58
 
 
104.51
 
 
104.38
 
 
144.39
 
 
190.64
 

Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data

The following selected consolidated financial data is derived from and should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes set forth in Item 8 below, and in our previously filed reports on Form 10-K. See also Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for further information relating to items reflecting our results of operations and financial condition.

 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009 
 
 (in thousands, except per share data) 
Statements of Operations Data: 
  
  
  
  
 
Revenue $85,335  $88,374  $104,121  $95,493  $55,364 
Cost of revenue  73,507   63,522   59,339   58,998   41,495 
Gross profit  11,828   24,852   44,782   36,495   13,869 
Operating expenses:                    
Selling, general, and administrative  16,066   15,419   14,836   13,972   13,389 
Research and development  3,424   3,468   2,473   2,339   1,569 
Restructuring charge              507 
Total operating expenses  19,490   18,887   17,309   16,311   15,465 
Income (loss) from operations  (7,662)  5,965   27,473   20,184   (1,596)
Interest income, net  408   518   449   53   177 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures  1,377   1,281   741   259   484 
Other income (expense), net  (748)  (761)  (45)  2,203   (99)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  (6,625)  7,003   28,618   22,699   (1,034)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes  188   853   2,795   2,323   471 
Net income (loss)  (6,813)  6,150   25,823   20,376   (1,505)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  1,145   3,040   5,503   1,723   393 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc. $(7,958) $3,110  $20,320  $18,653  $(1,898)
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc. per common share:                    
Basic $(0.25) $0.09  $0.63  $0.60  $(0.07)
Diluted $(0.25) $0.09  $0.61  $0.57  $(0.07)
Shares used in per share calculations:                    
Basic  32,700   32,144   31,872   31,008   30,500 
Diluted  32,700   32,865   33,061   32,512   30,500 

26

27

 
 December 31, 
 
  2013   2012   2011   2010   2009 
 
 (in thousands) 
Balance Sheet Data:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $24,961  $30,634  $26,156  $23,724  $16,934 
Investments  22,644   19,461   14,486   17,251   18,469 
Working capital  84,114   93,376   92,220   82,116   70,681 
Total assets  163,822   167,589   162,488   140,251   107,946 
Long-term debt, net of current portion              420 
Stockholders’ equity  145,546   150,914   147,049   119,804   97,251 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
(in thousands, except per share data)
Statements of Operations Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
83,499
 
$
85,335
 
$
88,374
 
$
104,121
 
$
95,493
 
Cost of revenue
 
66,332
 
 
73,507
 
 
63,522
 
 
59,339
 
 
58,998
 
Gross profit
 
17,167
 
 
11,828
 
 
24,852
 
 
44,782
 
 
36,495
 
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling, general, and administrative
 
14,970
 
 
16,066
 
 
15,419
 
 
14,836
 
 
13,972
 
Research and development
 
4,144
 
 
3,424
 
 
3,468
 
 
2,473
 
 
2,339
 
Restructuring charge
 
907
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating expenses
 
20,021
 
 
19,490
 
 
18,887
 
 
17,309
 
 
16,311
 
Income (loss) from operations
 
(2,854
)
 
(7,662
)
 
5,965
 
 
27,473
 
 
20,184
 
Interest income, net
 
483
 
 
408
 
 
518
 
 
449
 
 
53
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
 
1,528
 
 
1,377
 
 
1,281
 
 
741
 
 
259
 
Other income (expense), net
 
361
 
 
(748
)
 
(761
)
 
(45
)
 
2,203
 
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
 
(482
)
 
(6,625
)
 
7,003
 
 
28,618
 
 
22,699
 
Provision for income taxes
 
215
 
 
188
 
 
853
 
 
2,795
 
 
2,323
 
Net income (loss)
 
(697
)
 
(6,813
)
 
6,150
 
 
25,823
 
 
20,376
 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
691
 
 
1,145
 
 
3,040
 
 
5,503
 
 
1,723
 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc.
$
(1,388
)
$
(7,958
)
$
3,110
 
$
20,320
 
$
18,653
 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc. per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.25
)
$
0.09
 
$
0.63
 
$
0.60
 
Diluted
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.25
)
$
0.09
 
$
0.61
 
$
0.57
 
Shares used in per share calculations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
32,452
 
 
32,700
 
 
32,144
 
 
31,872
 
 
31,008
 
Diluted
 
32,452
 
 
32,700
 
 
32,865
 
 
33,061
 
 
32,512
 
December 31,
2014
2013
2012
2011
2010
(in thousands)
Balance Sheet Data:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
28,814
 
$
24,961
 
$
30,634
 
$
26,156
 
$
23,724
 
Investments
 
20,123
 
 
22,644
 
 
19,461
 
 
14,486
 
 
17,251
 
Working capital
 
88,422
 
 
84,114
 
 
93,376
 
 
92,220
 
 
82,116
 
Total assets
 
161,517
 
 
163,822
 
 
167,589
 
 
162,488
 
 
140,251
 
Current liabilities
 
14,771
 
 
15,426
 
 
13,096
 
 
10,883
 
 
14,839
 
Long-term debt, net of current portion
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stockholders’ equity
 
144,688
 
 
145,546
 
 
150,914
 
 
147,049
 
 
119,804
 


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In addition to historical information, the following discussion contains forward‑lookingforward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ substantially from those referred to herein due to a number of factors, including but not limited to risks described in the section entitled Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion should be read in conjunction with Item 6. “Selected Consolidated Financial Data” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

27

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On August 11, 2014, we announced the appointment of Mr. Gary L. Fischer as the Company’s Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary, effective as of August 11, 2014. Dr. Morris S. Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company relinquished his role as Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company, effective as of August 11, 2014.

Restructuring Charges

On February 25, 2014, we announced a restructuring plan with respect to our wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co, Ltd., or Tongmei, in order to better align manufacturing capacity with demand. Under the restructuring plan, Tongmei implemented certain workforce reductions with respect to its manufacturing facility in China. We reduced the workforce at Tongmei by approximately 93 positions that were no longer required to support production and operations, or approximately 11 percent of our workforce. We recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $907,000 related to the reduction in force for severance-related expenses. This restructuring plan and reduction in force has been completed as of March 31, 2014.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, we make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported on our consolidated financial statements. These estimates, assumptions and judgments about future events and their effects on our results cannot be determined with certainty, and are made based upon our historical experience and on other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur or additional information is obtained, and we may periodically be faced with uncertainties, the outcomes of which are not within our control and may not be known for a prolonged period of time.

We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and understanding of our financial condition and results of operations. Critical accounting policies are material to the presentation of our consolidated financial statements and require us to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. They may require us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate, and differentestimate. Different estimates that we could have used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, may have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We also refer you to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.


Revenue Recognition

We manufacture and sell high-performance compound semiconductor substrates and sell certain raw materials including gallium, germanium dioxide, and pBN crucibles. After we ship our products, there are no remaining obligations or customer acceptance requirements that would preclude revenue recognition. Our products are typically sold pursuant to a purchase order placed by our customers, and our terms and conditions of sale do not require customer acceptance. We recognize revenue upon shipment and transfer of title of products to our customers, which is either upon shipment from our dock, receipt at the customer’s dock, or removal from consignment inventory at the customer’s location, provided that we have received a signed purchase order, the price is fixed or determinable, title and risk of ownership have transferred, collection of resulting receivables is probable, and product returns are reasonably estimable. We do not provide training, installation or commissioning services.


We provide for future returns based on historical experience, current economic trends and changes in customer demand at the time revenue is recognized.

Accounts Receivable, Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

sales returns

We periodically review the likelihood of collection on our accounts receivable balances and provide an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable primarily based upon the age of these accounts. We evaluate receivables from U.S. customers with an emphasis on balances in excess of 90 days and for receivables from customers located outside the U.S. with an emphasis on balances in excess of 120 days and establish a reserve allowance on the receivable balances if needed. The reason for the difference in the evaluation of receivables between foreign and U.S. customers is that U.S. customers have historically made payments in a shorter period of time than foreign customers. Foreign business practices generally require us to allow customer payment terms that are longer than those accepted in the United States. We assess the probability of collection based on a number of factors, including the length of time a receivable balance has been outstanding, our past history with the customer and their creditworthiness.


28

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As of December 31, 20132014 and December 31, 2012,2013, our accounts receivable, net balance was $14.9$17.9 million and $17.9$14.9 million, respectively, which was net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $410,000 and $869,000, and zero, respectively. During 2014, we decreased this allowance for doubtful accounts by $459,000 primarily for improved collections worldwide. During 2013 we increased our allowance for doubtful accounts by $869,000 primarily because of the poor financial condition of a few customers in China. During 2011, we decreased our allowance for doubtful accounts by $99,000 compared to the amount as of December 31, 2010 primarily for improved collections worldwide.No amounts have been written off. If actual uncollectible accounts differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts would be required, which could have a material impact on our financial results for the future periods.

The allowance for sales returns is also deducted from gross accounts receivable. During 2014, we utilized $410,000 and charged an additional $183,000 resulting in the allowance for sales returns of $413,000 as of December 31, 2014. During 2013, we utilized $189,000 and charged an additional $130,000 resulting in the allowance for sales returns of $186,000 as of December 31, 2013. During 2012, we utilized $426,000 and reservedcharged an additional $547,000 resulting in the allowance for sales returns of $245,000 as of December 31, 2012. During 2011, we utilized $144,000 and reduced allowance of $194,000 from the beginning balance of $462,000 resulting in the allowance for sales returns of $124,000 as of December 31, 2011.

Warranty Reserve

We maintain a warranty reserve based upon our claims experience during the prior twelve12 months. Warranty costs are accrued at the time revenue is recognized. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, accrued product warranties totaled $802,000 and $1.0 million, and $588,000, respectively. The increasedecrease in accrued product warranties is primarily attributable to increaseddecreased claims for quality issues experienced by some customers. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations for future periods.


Inventory Valuation

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average cost method. Our inventory consists of raw materials as well as finished goods and work-in-process that include material, labor and manufacturing overhead costs. Given the nature of our substrate products, and the materials used in the manufacturing process, the wafers and ingots comprising work-in-process may be held in inventory for up to two years and three years, respectively, as the risk of obsolescence for these materials is low. We routinely evaluate the levels of our inventory in light of current market conditions in order to identify excess and obsolete inventory, and we provide a valuation allowance for certain inventories based upon the age and quality of the product and the projections for sale of the completed products. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, we had an inventory reserve of $11.0$11.2 million and $10.1$11.0 million, respectively, for excess and obsolete inventory. If actual demand for our products were to be substantially lower than estimated, additional inventory adjustments for excess or obsolete inventory might be required, which could have a material impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Impairment of Investments

We classify our investments in debt and equity securities as available-for-sale securities in accordance with ASC topic 320, Investments—Debt and Equity Securities (“ASC 320”). All available-for-sale securities with a quoted market value below cost (or adjusted cost) are reviewed in order to determine whether the decline is other-than-temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the magnitude of the decline in market value, the length of time the market value has been below cost (or adjusted cost), credit quality, and our ability and intent to hold the securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

We invest in equity instruments of privately-held companies in China for business and strategic purposes. These investments are classified as other assets and are accounted for under the cost method as we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over their operations. We monitor our investments for impairment and record reductions in carrying value when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Determination of impairment is highly subjective and is based on a number of factors, including an assessment of the strength of investee’s management, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than our cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, fundamental changes to the business prospects of the investee, share prices of subsequent offerings, and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in our carrying value. We had no write‑downswrite-downs in 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.

2012.

Fair Value of Investments

ASC topic 820, Fair Value Measurement (“ASC 820”) establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.

29

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Level 1 instruments represent quoted prices in active markets. Therefore, determining fair value for Level 1 instruments does not require significant management judgment, and the estimation is not difficult.


Level 2 instruments include observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for identicalcomparable instruments in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), issuer credit ratings, non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated with observable market data, model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities, or quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities. These Level 2 instruments require more management judgment and subjectivity compared to Level 1 instruments, including:

Determining which instruments are most comparable to the instrument being priced requires management to identify a sample of similar securities based on the coupon rates, maturity, issuer, credit rating, and instrument type, and subjectively select an individual security or multiple securities that are deemed most similar to the security being priced.

Determining which model-derived valuations to use in determining fair value requires management judgment. When observable market prices for identical securities or similar securities are not available, we price our marketable debt instruments using non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with observable market data or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow models, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data.
·Determining which instruments are most similar to the instrument being priced requires management to identify a sample of similar securities based on the coupon rates, maturity, issuer, credit rating, and instrument type, and subjectively select an individual security or multiple securities that are deemed most similar to the security being priced.

·Determining which model-derived valuations to use in determining fair value requires management judgment. When observable market prices for identical securities or similar securities are not available, we price our marketable debt instruments using non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with observable market data or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow models, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data.

Level 3 instruments include unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities. The determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments requires the most management judgment and subjectivity. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, we did not have any assets or liabilities required to be carried at fair value without observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (Level 3 assets).


Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate the recoverability of property, equipment and intangible assets in accordance with ASC topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360”). When events and circumstances indicate that long-lived assets may be impaired, we compare the carrying value of the long-lived assets to the projection of future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. In the event that the carrying value exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows, we record an impairment charge against income equal to the excess of the carrying value over the asset’s fair value. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable. Assets held for sale are carried at the lower of carrying value or estimated net realizable value. We had no “Assets held for sale” on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012.


2013.

Stock Based Compensation

We account for stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC topic 718, Stock-based Compensation (“ASC 718”). Share-based awards granted include stock options and restricted stock awards. We utilize the Black‑ScholesBlack-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the grant date fair value of stock options, which requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including estimating stock price volatility and expected term. Historical volatility of our stock price was used while the expected term for our options was estimated based on historical option exercise behavior and post-vesting forfeitures of options, and the contractual term, the vesting period and the expected term of the outstanding options. Further, we apply an expected forfeiture rate in determining the amount of share-based compensation. We use historical forfeitures to estimate the rate of future forfeitures rates.forfeitures. Changes in these inputs and assumptions can materially affect the measure of estimated fair value of our stock compensation. The cost of restricted stock awards is determined using the fair value of our common stock on the date of grant.

We recognize the compensation costs net of an estimated forfeiture rate over the requisite service period of the options award, which is generally the vesting term of four years. Compensation expense for restricted stock awards is recognized over the vesting period, which is generally three years or four years. Stock-based compensation expense is recorded in cost of revenue, research and development, and selling, general and administrative expenses. (see Note 1—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies—Stock‑BasedStock-Based Compensation).

30

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

We provide for income taxes based upon the geographic composition of worldwide earnings and tax regulations governing each region, particularly China. The calculation of tax liabilities involves significant judgment in estimating the impact of uncertainties in the application of complex tax laws, particularly in foreign countries such as China.

See Note 13—”Income Taxes” in the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

Results of Operations

Overview

We were founded in 1986 to commercialize and enhance our proprietary vertical gradient freeze (VGF) techniquetechnology for producing high-performance compound semiconductor substrates.substrates or wafers. We have one operating segment: our substrate business with limited additionaland the sale raw materials sales.used to make such substrates or other related products. We recorded our first substrate sales in 1990 and our substrate division currently sells gallium arsenide (GaAs), indium phosphide (InP) and germanium (Ge) substrates to manufacturers of semiconductor devices for use in applications such as fiber optic and wireless telecommunications, light emitting diodes (LEDs), lasers and for solar cells for space and terrestrial photovoltaic applications. We also sell raw materials including gallium and germanium through our participation in majority‑majority- and minority‑ownedminority-owned subsidiaries and joint ventures.

Operating Results

We manufacture all of our semiconductor substrates using our proprietary vertical gradient freeze (VGF) technology. Most of ourOur GaAs substrate product line generates the most revenue is from sales of GaAs substrates.as compared to Ge, InP or raw material sales. We manufacture all of our products in the People’s Republic of China (PRC or China), which generally has favorable costs for facilities and labor compared to comparable facilities in the United States, Japan or Europe. We also haveOur supply chain includes AXT subsidiaries and joint ventures in China, thatwhich provide us pricing advantages, reliable supply and shorterenhanced sourcing lead-times for key raw materials which are central to our final manufactured products.

Our business and operating results depend in significant part upon capital expenditures of semiconductor designers and manufacturers, which in turn depend upon the current and anticipated market demand for products incorporating semiconductors from these designers and manufacturers. Our business also depends in part on worldwide economic conditions. During 2013, we

We have experienced some fluctuationdeclining annual revenue in the customer demand for the semi-insulatinglast three years, primarily as a result of silicon chips replacing GaAs substrates that are used for end-productschips in the wireless marketmobile phone switching function. Previous to certain recent innovations silicon chips did not perform adequately in this function due to power consumption, heat and speed issues. The application of the semi-conductingsilicon-on-insulator technique overcame these deficiencies and provided a lower cost solution for mobile phone switches. We believe that this transition in the mobile phone switches starting in 2011 was largely completed in late 2013 and early 2014. Mobile phones continue to use GaAs chips in other functions, primarily in the power amplifier function, and we are currently developing a GaAs substrate usedto meet the specifications for this function. The decline in revenue in 2014 compared to 2013 was partially mitigated by revenue growth in our InP and raw material product lines. As a result of the disruption in the light emitting diode (LED) market.GaAs substrate market caused by silicon-on-insulator, a leading Japanese competitor exited the market in 2014 and we believe this also contributed to the smaller decline in our revenue because customers turned to AXT and other suppliers to fulfill their GaAs substrate needs. We believe consolidation withinour product and customer diversity partially mitigated the basedeclines in GaAs revenue.

In the first quarter of customers for2014 we reduced our products was likelywork force by approximately 11% and embarked on a number of additional cost reduction programs, primarily in our manufacturing group which has the reason for slower qualifications forhighest costs as compared to research and development or selling and administrative expenses. These steps helped to reduce our business, but may create more opportunities in the future. The increased adoption of SOI technology also impacted the overall industry.  Ge substrate revenue increased primarily due to more planned satellite launchesnet loss from $8.0 million in 2013 compared to 2012 anda net loss of $1.4 million in 2014. They also contributed to improved gross margins which moved from increased demand from concentrated photovoltaic applications for solar terrestrial cells. We expect Ge substrate revenue13.9 percent in 2013 to increase20.6 percent in the future as we are seeing increased demand from concentrated photovoltaic applications for solar terrestrial cells; however, we expect Ge raw material cost remains high in 2014. Revenue from InP substrates increased as the demand from customers in the optical networking industry increased. Our raw materials revenue decreased primarily due to decreased selling prices of raw gallium.

2014.

As we move into 2014, we expect that the demand for GaAs products will be continually driven by the proliferation of smart phones and tablets. These devices, which enable full performance of video, gaming and Internet browsing capabilities, are driving increases in wireless subscribers in major geographic areas around the world as well as an upgrade cycle for new devices. We expect the demand for semi-conducting GaAs substrates in the LED market will increase; however, we needlook ahead to penetrate into a few key accounts in order to capture more market share. We also expect Ge substrates sales will improve in 2014 as there is increasing interest in the replacement of fossil fuel resources with sustainable alternatives such as solar power and solar modules and a renewed interest in renewable energy technology, particularly in Europe and China. At the same time,2015, we believe that improvements in conversion efficiency for Ge has been occurring, which we believe will continue to enable this technology tocertain applications and products can become more affordable and therefore, more widely utilized,strong revenue drivers but a number of these are still in the future.early stage of development or limited production downstream and we are unable to predict if and when these applications may become stronger drivers of revenue. We also expectintend to invest in manufacturing equipment that will increase automation and therein decrease the number of manually operated processing steps in our production flow. We believe this can improve our manufacturing yields, product quality and product consistency.

31

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Revenue

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
Revenue
$
83,499
 
$
85,335
 
$
88,374
 
$
(1,836
)
 
(2.2
)%
$
(3,039
)
 
(3.4
)%

Revenue decreased $1.8 million, or 2.2%, to $83.5 million in 2014 from $85.3 million in 2013. The revenue decrease resulted from decreased demand for our substrate materials, particularly for our Ge substrates which in 2013 were stronger than 2014 because of a Concentrated Photovoltaic (CPV) solar installation in South Africa. The decline in sales of Ge substrates was partially offset by an increase in 2014 in sales of InP substratesubstrates and in sales which currently representsof raw materials. GaAs revenue decreased in 2014 by a smallermodest amount, in the low single digits. GaAs revenue in the past several years has seen larger decreases as a result of silicon-based chips, or SOI, capturing a large portion of revenue, will increase duethe switching function in mobile phones. For example, the year on year decline from 2012 to growing demand2013 was 22% for GaAs. In light of the relatively modest decline in the optical networking industry. For raw materials sales,2014 compared to previous years, we believe the selling pricedisruptions caused by the introduction of gallium has slowed its decline and we expect thisSOI in mobile phone switches business have largely concluded. However there can be no assurances that other applications currently using our substrates will favorably affect our raw material revenue in 2014.

Revenue
 
 
  
  
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
GaAs  
 $40,234  $51,368  $63,697  $(11,134)  (21.7)% $(12,329)  (19.4)%
InP  
  7,128   6,024   5,182   1,104   18.3%  842   16.2%
Ge  
  16,962   8,734   11,635   8,228   94.2%  (2,901)  (24.9)%
Raw Materials and other  
  21,011   22,248   23,607   (1,237)  (5.6)%  (1,359)  (5.8)%
Total revenue  
 $85,335  $88,374  $104,121  $(3,039)  (3.4)% $(15,747)  (15.1)%

not be challenged by less expensive silicon-based wafers or other alternative technologies.

Revenue decreased by $3.0 million or 3.4%, to $85.3 million in 2013 from $88.4 million in 2012. Total GaAs substrate revenue decreased $11.1 million, or 21.7%, to $40.2 million in 2013 from $51.3 million in 2012. The decrease in revenue was primarily due to the softer demand from our current customer base in the LED market and reduced orders from a few big customers as demand fell in the wireless market compared to 2012.

Sales of 2 inch, 3 inch and 4 inch diameter GaAs substrates, which are mainly used in LED applications, decreased by $6.6 million to $27.7 million in 2013 compared to $34.3 million in 2012 primarily due to weaker demand from our current customers in LED applications in all geographic regions.

Sales of 5 inch and 6 inch diameter GaAs substrates, which are mainly used in wireless devices, decreased by $4.5 million to $12.6 million in 2013 compared to $17.0 million in 2012 primarily due to reduced orders from a few big customers as demand fell in the wireless market.

Revenue decreased by $15.7 million or 15.1%, to $88.4 million in 2012 from $104.1 million in 2011. Total GaAs substrate revenue decreased $12.3 million, or 19.4%, to $51.4 million in 2012 from $63.7 million in 2011. The decrease in revenue was primarily due to the softer demand from our customer base in both the LED market and wireless devices market compared to 2011. Sales of 2 inch, 3 inch and 4 inch diameter GaAs substrates, decreased by $8.7 million to $34.3 million in 2012 compared to $43.0 million in 2011 primarily due to weaker demand from our customers in LED applications in all geographic regions except Taiwan which was particularly strong in the first half of 2012. Sales of 5 inch and 6 inch diameter GaAs substrates decreased by $3.7 million to $17.0 million in 2012 compared to $20.7 million in 2011 primarily due to lower demand for semi-insulating GaAs substrate from our customers in the wireless devices market compared to prior year.
InP substrate revenue increased by $1.1 million, or 18.3%, to $7.1 million in 2013 compared to $6.0 million in 2012 as demand from customers in the optical networking industry increased. We continued and expect to see renewed demand for these substrates as investment in high-speed optical communications continue to increase worldwide in 2014. InP substrate revenue increased by $842,000, or 16.2%, to $6.0 million in 2012 compared to $5.2 million in 2011 as demand from customers in the optical networking industry increased.
Ge substrate revenue increased by $8.2 million, or 94.2%, to $17.0 million in 2013 from $8.7 million in 2012. Our Ge substrate revenue increased primarily due to more planned satellite launches in 2013 compared 2012 and from increased demand from concentrated photovoltaic applications for solar terrestrial cells. Ge substrate revenue decreased by $2.9 million, or 24.9%, to $8.7 million in 2012 from $11.6 million in 2011 due to fewer planned satellite launches in 2012 particularly in Asia.

Raw materials and other revenue decreased by $1.2 million, or 5.6%, to $21.0 million in 2013 from $22.2 million in 2012 primarily due to decreased selling prices which was partially offset by increased tonnage sold, as well as by increased revenue from pyrolytic boron nitride (pBN) crucibles due to increased demand. Raw materials and other revenue decreased by $1.4 million, or 5.8%, to $22.2 million in 2012 from $23.6 million in 2011 primarily due to decreased selling prices which was partially offset by increased tonnage sold, as well as by increased revenue from pyrolytic boron nitride (pBN) crucibles due to increased demand. 

Although our raw materials revenue decreased in 2013 due to decreased selling prices, it remains an important part of our business, as it provides us protection against raw materials pricing increases and supply constraints. Since we are able to supply raw materials necessary for the production of our substrates at favorable prices, our ability to sell such materials in the open market, at market prices, also provides us with pricing protection. We expect to continue to expand our raw materials sales efforts

Revenue by Geographic Region

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
($ in thousands, except percentages)
North America*
$
10,292
 
$
10,665
 
$
15,391
 
$
(373
)
 
(3.5
)%
$
(4,726
)
 
(30.7
)%
% of total revenue
 
12
%
 
12
%
 
17
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Europe (primarily Germany)
 
21,535
 
 
21,387
 
 
18,170
 
 
148
 
 
0.7
%
 
3,217
 
 
17.7
%
% of total revenue
 
26
%
 
25
%
 
21
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Japan
 
11,550
 
 
9,041
 
 
9,346
 
 
2,509
 
 
27.8
%
 
(305
)
 
(3.3
)%
% of total revenue
 
14
%
 
11
%
 
11
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taiwan
 
11,464
 
 
10,131
 
 
10,985
 
 
1,333
 
 
13.2
%
 
(854
)
 
(7.8
)%
% of total revenue
 
14
%
 
12
%
 
12
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
China
 
17,451
 
 
24,946
 
 
19,815
 
 
(7,495
)
 
(30.0
)%
 
5,131
 
 
25.9
%
% of total revenue
 
21
%
 
29
%
 
22
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Asia Pacific (excluding China, Japan and Taiwan)
 
11,207
 
 
9,165
 
 
14,667
 
 
2,042
 
 
22.3
%
 
(5,502
)
 
(37.5
)%
% of total revenue
 
13
%
 
11
%
 
17
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total revenue
$
83,499
 
$
85,335
 
$
88,374
 
$
(1,836
)
 
(2.2
)%
$
(3,039
)
 
(3.4
)%

 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
North America* $10,665  $15,391  $20,471  $(4,726)  (30.7)% $(5,080)  (24.8)%
% of total revenue  12%  17%  20%                
Europe  21,387   18,170   21,082   3,217   17.7%  (2,912)  (13.8)%
% of total revenue  25%  21%  20%                
Japan  9,041   9,346   13,749   (305)  (3.3)%  (4,403)  (32.0)%
% of total revenue  11%  11%  13%                
Taiwan  10,131   10,985   9,813   (854)  (7.8)%  1,172   11.9%
% of total revenue  12%  12%  9%                
China  24,946   19,815   25,181   5,131   25.9%  (5,366)  (21.3%)
% of total revenue  29%  22%  24%                
Asia Pacific (excluding China, Japan and Taiwan)  9,165   14,667   13,825   (5,502)  (37.5)%  842   6.1%
% of total revenue  11%  17%  14%                
Total revenue $85,335  $88,374  $104,121  $(3,039)  (3.4)% $(15,747)  (15.1)%

*Primarily the United States.

Sales to customers located outside of North America represented approximately 88%, 83%,88% and 80%83% of our revenue during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

We increased our sales in Japan, Taiwan and 2011,Asia Pacific in 2014 by $2.5 million, $1.3 million and $2.0 million respectively. Increases in Japan resulted from a strategic focus of our selling and business development efforts initiated late in 2013. This strategic focus delivered modest benefits the first half of 2014 and more substantial benefits in second half of 2014. Increases in Taiwan and Asia Pacific resulted from generally a more active market for our products with existing customers and the addition of a sales professional assigned to these regions. Further,

Revenue

32

TABLE OF CONTENTS

we assigned additional resources for technical support to assist our customers in characterizing the products we delivered. In 2014 revenue from customers in China decreased substantially primarily due to decreased substrate revenue and raw material revenue. In 2014 revenue in North America and Europe was generally unchanged over 2013.

In 2013 revenue from customers located in North America decreased from 2012 by $4.7 million, or 30.7%, to $10.7 million in 2013 from $15.4 million in 2012.. This decrease in 2013 was primarily due to decreased demand for raw materials primarily from 4N raw gallium and decreased demand for GaAs substrates, reflecting the slower demandchanges in the wireless market, which ismobile phone market. The decrease in North America in 2013 was partially offset by increased demand for InP substrates used in the optical networking industry. RevenueIn 2013 revenue from customers located in North Americathe Asia Pacific region (excluding China, Japan and Taiwan) decreased by $5.1$5.5 million, or 24.8%, to $15.4 million in 2012 from $20.5 million in 2011.37.5%. This decrease in 2012 was primarily due to decreased sales of GaAs substrates to customers in Singapore, partially offset by increased sales of 4N raw gallium. 

RevenueGe substrates to customers in Malaysia. In 2013 revenue from customers in China increased by $5.1 million, or 25.9%. China revenue in 2013 increased across all of our product lines. In 2013 revenue from customers located in Europe increased by $3.2 million, or 17.7%, to $21.4 million in 2013 from $18.2 million in 2012. This. The increase in 2013Europe was primarily due to increased sales of Ge substrates and raw material sales to customers in Germany, partially offset by decreased demand for GaAs substrates from customers in Germany. RevenueIn 2013 revenue in Japan and Taiwan was generally unchanged over 2012.

Gross Margin

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
($ in thousands, except percentages)
Gross profit
$
17,167
 
$
11,828
 
$
24,852
 
$
5,339
 
 
45.1
%
$
(13,024
)
 
(52.4
)%
Gross Margin %
 
20.6
%
 
13.9
%
 
28.1
%

Gross margin increased to 20.6% of total revenue in 2014 from customers located13.9% of total revenue in Europe decreased by $2.9 million, or 13.8%, to $18.2 million in 2012 from $21.1 million in 2011. This decrease in 2012 was2013. Gross margin increased primarily due to decreased salesproduct mix and implementation of GaAs substratescost-saving activities during 2014. The 2014 quarter gross margin for the first quarter to customers in Germanythe fourth quarter were 14.1%, 19.4%, 23.0% and United Kingdom, decreased raw material sales to customers in Germany and Slovakia, partially offset by increased substrates sales to customers in France.

Revenue from customers located in Japan decreased by $305,000, or 3.3%25.4%, to $9.0 million in 2013 from $9.3 million in 2012. This decrease in 2013 was primarily due to decreased sales of GaAs substrates and 4N raw gallium, offset by increased sales from pyrolytic boron nitride (pBN) crucibles. Revenue from customers located in Japan decreased by $4.4 million, or 32.0%, to $9.3 million in 2012 from $13.7 million in 2011. This decrease in 2012 was primarily due to decreased sales of GaAs substrates and 4N raw gallium.
Revenue from customers in Taiwan decreased by $854,000, or 7.8%, to $10.1 million in 2013 from $11.0 million in 2012. This decrease in 2013 was primarily due to decreased sales of semi-conducting GaAs substrates, partially offset by increased sales of semi-insulating GaAs substrates to a major customer. Revenue from customers in Taiwan increased by $1.2 million, or 11.9%, to $11.0 million in 2012 from $9.8 million in 2011. This increase in 2012 was primarily due to increased sales of semi-conducting GaAs substrates and InP substrates, partially offset by decreased sales of semi-insulating GaAs substrates to a major customer.
Revenue from customers in China increased by $5.1 million, or 25.9%, to $25.0 million in 2013 from $19.8 million in 2012. This increase in 2013 was contributed by increased sales from all of our products in China and the most noticeable increase came from Ge substrate sales. Revenue from customers in China decreased by $5.4 million, or 21.3%, to $19.8 million in 2012 from $25.2 million in 2011. This decrease in 2012 was primarily due to decreased sales of 4N raw gallium, Ge substrates and semi-conducting GaAs substrates.
Revenue from customers in the Asia Pacific region (excluding China, Japan and Taiwan) decreased by $5.5 million, or 37.5%, to $9.2 million in 2013 from $14.7 million in 2012. This decrease in 2013 was primarily due to decreased sales of semi-insulating GaAs substrates to customers in Singapore, partially offset by increased sales of Ge substrates to customers in Malaysia. Revenue from customers in the Asia Pacific region (excluding China, Japan and Taiwan) increased by $842,000, or 6.1%, to $14.7 million in 2012 from $13.8 million in 2011. This increase in 2012 was primarily due to increased sales of semi-insulating GaAs substrates, partially offset by decreased sales of semi-conducting to customers in Singapore.
Gross Margin
 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
 
Gross profit $11,828  $24,852  $44,782  $(13,024)  (52.4)% $(19,930)  (44.5)%
Gross Margin %  13.9%  28.1%  43.0%                

respectively.

Gross margin decreased to 13.9% of total revenue in 2013 from 28.1% of total revenue in 2012. Lower revenue and lower average selling prices due to product mix and customer mix negatively impacted the gross margins for GaAs substrates for 2013. Although Ge substrate sales increased by $8.2 million, gross margins for Ge substrate was decreased due to higher priced raw material in our inventory and lower average selling prices in 2013. Gross margins for raw material sales also decreased due to decreased selling prices of 4N raw gallium compared to 2012. The 2013 quarter gross margin for the first quarter to the fourth quarter of 15.6%, 13.5%13.5%, 11.9% and 15.1%, respectively, also reflects the impact of lower rate of absorption of manufacturing overhead across lower production volume compared to last year.

Gross margin decreased to 28.1% of total revenue in 2012 from 43.0% of total revenue in 2011. Approximately $1.3 million, or 1.5% of total revenue for the year of 2012 was expensed for supplemental and retroactive VATs levied by the tax authorities in China which was applicable for the period from July 1, 2011 to June 30, 2012. In addition, higher priced raw material in our inventory and lower average selling prices due to product mix and customer mix also negatively impacted the gross margins for all substrates for 2012. Gross margins for raw material sales also decreased due to decreased selling prices of 4N raw gallium compared to 2011. The 2012 quarterly trend of gross margin for the first quarter to the fourth quarter of 34.9%, 29.8%, 26.3% and 19.5%, respectively, also reflects the impact of lower rate of absorption of manufacturing overhead across lower production volume compared to the prior year.
respectively.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses $16,066  $15,419  $14,836  $647   4.2% $583   3.9%
% of total revenue  18.8%  17.4%  14.2%                

cost-saving activities and a decrease in bad debt expense. These items were partially offset by an increase in professional services of $613,000 related to an investigation of certain potential related-party transactions, and higher personnel related costs. We expect our selling, general administrative expenses to increase in the first quarter of 2015 due to higher professional services expense incurred of approximately $1.2 million related to the investigation.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $647,000 to $16.1 million for 2013 compared to $15.4 million for 2012. This increase in 2013 was primarily due to an increase in bad debt expense and higher rent expense primarily from early termination penalty of our lease for our U.S. office,, partially offset by decreased sales commission expenses resulting from lower revenue and lower office supply expenses. We expect our selling, general administrative expenses may decrease in the future due to the implementation of our restructuring plan in our manufacturing facility in China in 2014.

Selling, general

33

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Research and administrativeDevelopment Expenses

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
($ in thousands, except percentages)
Research and development expenses
$
4,144
 
$
3,424
 
$
3,468
 
$
720
 
 
21.0
%
$
(44
)
 
(1.3
)%
% of total revenue
 
5.0
%
 
4.0
%
 
3.9
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Research and development expenses increased $583,000$720,000, or 21.0%, to $15.4$4.1 million for 2012 compared to $14.82014 from $3.4 million for 2011. This increase in 2012 was2013. Research and development expenses increased primarily due to higher product development and testing costs and personnel related costs, including salaries and retirement benefits for employees in our joint ventures, higher stock-based compensation expenses resulting from the new options and awards granted in 2011 and 2012, absence of bad debt reversal credit recorded in 2011, partially offset by lower bonus from unfavorable financial resultsconsulting expenses for product testing. We expect our rate of expenditures on research and lower sales commission expenses from lower commissionable substrates sales.

Researchdevelopment costs in 2015 to be stable as we, and Development Expenses
 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
 
Research and development expenses $3,424  $3,468  $2,473  $(44)  (1.3)% $995   40.2%
% of total revenue  4.0%  3.9%  2.4%                

our consolidated subsidiaries and joint ventures maintain our research and development efforts.

Research and development expenses decreased $44,000, or 1.3%, to $3.4 million for 2013 from $3.5 million for 2012. Research and development expenses decreased slightly primarily due to lower personnel related costs including the fact that no bonuses were paid due to lack of achievement of financial metrics and lower product development and testing costs, partially offset by higher consulting expenses for product testing.

Restructuring Charges

In the first quarter of 2014, we reduced the workforce at Tongmei by approximately 93 positions that are no longer required to support production and operations, or approximately 11 percent of the workforce. We expect our raterecorded a restructuring charge of expenditures on researchapproximately $907,000 related to the reduction in force for severance-related expenses. This restructuring plan and development costsreduction in force has been completed as of March 31, 2014.

Interest Income, Net

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
($ in thousands, except percentages)
Interest income, net
$
483
 
$
408
 
$
518
 
$
75
 
 
18.4
%
$
(110
)
 
(21.2
)%
% of total revenue
 
0.6
%
 
0.5
%
 
0.6
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Interest income, net increased $75,000 to $483,000 for 2014 to be stable as our joint ventures continue to maintain their efforts in research and development.

Research and development expenses increased $995,000, or 40.2%, to $3.5 millionfrom $408,000 for 2012 from $2.5 million for 2011. This increase in 2012 was2013 primarily due to higher personnel related costs including salaries and bonuses and higher stock-based compensation expenses mainly related to the hiringinterest income earned by one of a Chief Scientist in March 2012, higher product testing costs and higher health insurance cost.
Interest Income, Net
 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
 
Interest income, net $408  $518  $449  $(110)  (21.2)% $69   15.4%
% of total revenue  0.5%  0.6%  0.4%                

our subsidiaries from their bank deposits.

Interest income, net decreased $110,000 to $408,000 for 2013 from $518,000 for 2012 primarily due to lower returns from various investment portfolio mix, lower investment balances and lower interest income earned by our consolidated joint ventures from their bank.

Interest income, net increased $69,000 to $518,000 for 2012 from $449,000 for 2011 primarily due to higher interest income earned by our consolidated joint ventures from their bank deposits and interest income on loan from one of our consolidated joint ventures to its equity investment entity.

Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures $1,377  $1,281  $741  $96   7.5% $540   72.9%
% of total revenue  1.6%  1.5%  0.7%                

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
($ in thousands, except percentages)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
$
1,528
 
$
1,377
 
$
1,281
 
$
151
 
 
11.0
%
$
96
 
 
7.5
%
% of total revenue
 
1.8
%
 
1.6
%
 
1.5
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures is primarily net income from our minority-owned joint ventures that are not consolidated. Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $151,000 to $1.5 million for 2014 from $1.4 million for 2013 primarily due to higher net income from improved performance of our minority-owned joint ventures that are not consolidated.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $96,000 to $1.4 million for 2013 from $1.3 million for 2012 primarily due to higher net income recorded by our consolidated joint ventures from their minority investments.

Equity in earnings

34

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Other Income (Expense), Net

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
($ in thousands, except percentages)
Other income (expense), net
$
361
 
$
(748
)
$
(761
)
$
1,109
 
 
NM
 
$
13
 
 
1.7
%
% of total revenue
 
0.4
%
 
(0.9
)%
 
(0.9
)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

NM = % not meaningful

Other income, net increased $1.1 million to a profit net income of unconsolidated joint ventures increased $540,000 to $1.3 million$361,000 for 20122014 from $741,000net expense of $748,000 for 20112013 primarily due to higher net income recorded bya larger gain recognized from the sale of Intelligent Epitaxy Technology, Inc (IntelliEpi) common stock in 2014, lower withholding tax on foreign dividends from our consolidated joint ventures from their new minority investments.

Other Income (Expense), Net
 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
 
Other income (expense), net $(748) $(761) $(45) $13   1.7% $(716)  (1,591.1)%
% of total revenue  (0.9)%  (0.9)%  (0.0)%                

and lower foreign exchange losses in 2014.

Other expense, net decreased $13,000 to $748,000 for 2013 from $761,000 for 2012 primarily due to the gain recognized from the sale of our 35% ownership in our cost method investee (IntelliEpi) in its pre-IPO placement in Taiwan, the absence ofIn addition, in 2013 we did not have a loss on disposal of equipment from the same periodas we did in the prior year, 2012, this was partially offset by higher foreign exchange losses in 2013.

Other expense, net increased $716,000

Provision for (benefit from) Income Taxes

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
($ in thousands, except percentages)
Provision for income taxes
$
215
 
$
188
 
$
853
 
$
27
 
 
14.4
%
$
(665
)
 
(78.0
)%
% of total revenue
 
0.3
%
 
0.2
%
 
1.0
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Provision for income taxes for 2014 was $215,000, which was mostly related to $761,000our China subsidiary and our China joint venture operations. The slight increase in provision for 2012income taxes from $45,000 for 20112013 to 2014 was primarily due to higher net foreign exchange transaction losses mainly on our Yen denominated accounts receivable, higher withholdingtaxable income for state tax on foreign dividends from our consolidated joint ventures and higher losses on disposal of equipment.

Noncontrolling Interest
 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
 
Noncontrolling interest $1,145  $3,040  $5,503  $(1,895)  (62.3)% $(2,463)  (44.8)%
% of total revenue  1.3%  3.4%  5.3%                
Noncontrolling interestpurposes in earnings of consolidated joint venturesthe U.S. Besides the state tax liabilities, no income taxes or benefit have been provided for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were $1.1 million, $3.0 million, and $5.5 million, respectively. The decrease in noncontrolling interest from 2012 to 2013 and 2011 to 2012 wasU.S. operations due to lower profitabilitythe loss in the U.S. and the uncertainty of generating future profit in the U.S. which has resulted in our deferred tax asset being fully reserved. Our estimated tax rate can vary greatly from year to year because of the change or benefit in the mix of taxable income between our U.S. and China joint venture operations as profits from raw materials sales have decreased due to decreased selling prices.
Provision for Income Taxes
 
 
  2012 to 2013  2011 to 2012 
 
 Years Ended Dec. 31,  Increase  
  Increase  
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  (Decrease)  % Change  (Decrease)  % Change 
($ in thousands, except percentages) 
 
Provision for income taxes $188  $853  $2,795  $(665)  (78.0)% $(1,942)  (69.5)%
% of total revenue  0.2%  1.0%  2.7%                

based operations.

Provision for income taxes for 2013 was $188,000, which was mostly related to our China subsidiary and our China joint venture operations. The decrease in provision for income taxes from 2012 to 2013 was due to decreased net income of our foreign subsidiaries as well as lower taxable income for state tax purposes in the U.S. Furthermore, the provision for income taxes was partially offset by tax refunds received by our China joint ventures. Besides the state tax liabilities, no income taxes or benefit have been provided for U.S. operations due to the loss loss in the U.S. and the uncertainty of generating future profit in the U.S. which has resulted in our deferred tax asset being fully reserved.reserved. Our estimated tax rate can vary greatly from year to year because of the change or benefit in the mix of taxable income between our U.S. and China based operations.

Provision for income taxes for 2012 was $853,000, which was mostly related to our China subsidiary and our China joint venture operations. The decrease in provision for income taxes from 2011 to 2012 was due to decreased sales and net income of our foreign subsidiaries as well as lower taxable income for state tax purposes in the U.S. Furthermore, the provision for income taxes was partially offset by tax refunds received for state income taxes in the U.S. and received by our China joint ventures. Besides the state taxes liabilities, no income taxes or benefit have been provided for U.S. operations due to the loss in U.S. and the uncertainty of generating future profit in the U.S. which has resulted in our deferred tax asset being fully reserved.

Provision for income taxes for 2011 was $2.8 million, which was mostly related to our foreign subsidiaries. The increase in provision for income taxes from 2010 to 2011 was due to increased net income of our foreign subsidiaries as well as higher taxable income for state tax purposes in the U.S. Besides the state tax liabilities, no income taxes have been provided for U.S. operations due to the use of available federal net operating loss carryforwards.

Due to our uncertainty regarding our future profitability, we recorded a full valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets of $62 million in 2014, $58 million in 2013 and $51 million in 2012.

35

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Noncontrolling Interest

2013 to 2014
2012 to 2013
Years Ended Dec. 31,
Increase
(Decrease)
Increase
(Decrease)
2014
2013
2012
% Change
% Change
($ in thousands, except percentages)
Noncontrolling interest
$
691
 
$
1,145
 
$
3,040
 
$
(454
)
 
(39.7
)%
$
(1,895
)
 
(62.3
)%
% of total revenue
 
0.8
%
 
1.3
%
 
3.4
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Noncontrolling interest in earnings of consolidated joint ventures for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were $691,000, $1.1 million and $49.6$3.0 million, respectively. The decrease in 2011.

noncontrolling interest from 2014 to 2013 and 2012 to 2013 was due to lower profitability from our China joint venture operations as profits from raw materials sales have decreased due to decreased selling prices.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2013
  
2012
  
2011
 
 
 ($ in thousands) 
Net cash provided by (used in): 
  
  
 
Operating activities $2.509  $21,302  $18,132 
Investing activities  (6,212)  (13,168)  (15,430)
Financing activities  (2,513)  (3,792)  (999)
Effect of exchange rate changes  543   136   729 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents  (5,673)  4,478   2,432 
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning period  30,634   26,156   23,724 
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period  24,961   30,634   26,156 
Short and long-term investments—end of period  22,644   19,461   14,486 
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments $47,605  $50,095  $40,642 

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
($ in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating activities
$
3,824
 
$
2,509
 
$
21,302
 
Investing activities
 
142
 
 
(6,212
)
 
(13,168
)
Financing activities
 
(32
)
 
(2,513
)
 
(3,792
)
Effect of exchange rate changes
 
(81
)
 
543
 
 
136
 
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
 
3,853
 
 
(5,673
)
 
4,478
 
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning period
 
24,961
 
 
30,634
 
 
26,156
 
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period
 
28,814
 
 
24,961
 
 
30,634
 
Short and long-term investments—end of period
 
20,123
 
 
22,644
 
 
19,461
 
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments
$
48,937
 
$
47,605
 
$
50,095
 

We consider cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and long-term investments as liquid and available for use within two years in our current operations. Short-term investments and long-term investments are comprised of U.S. government securities and investment-grade corporate notes and bonds.bonds. Also included in short-term investments is our investment in common stock of Intelligent Epitaxy Technology, Inc (IntelliEPI),IntelliEPI, a Taiwan publicly-traded company. In 2013, we re-categorized our IntelliEPI investment from cost method investment to short-term investmentsavailable-for–sale security as they completed their initial public offering in 2013.

As of December 31, 2014, our principal sources of liquidity were $48.9 million, an increase of $1.3 million from $47.6 million as of December 31, 2013. This $48.9 million consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $28.8 million, short-term investments of $12.3 million and long-term investments of $7.8 million. In 2014 cash and cash equivalents increased $3.8 million. Short and long-term investments decreased by $2.5 million to $20.1 million from $22.6 million. The increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to net cash provided by operating activities of $3.8 million and by net cash provided by investing activities of $142,000, offset by net cash used in financing activities of $32,000 and the effect of exchange rate changes of $81,000. As of December 31, 2014, we and our consolidated joint ventures held approximately $18.3 million in cash and investments in foreign bank accounts. This consists of $10.2 million held by our wholly owned subsidiary in China and $8.1 million held by our three partially owned consolidated subsidiaries in China. Of this $18.3 million, approximately $13.9 million is not available for use in the United States without paying United States income taxes.

As of December 31, 2013, our principal sources of liquidity were $47.6 million of cash and investments, of which $10.0 million of cash and cash equivalent was held by our consolidated joint ventures, which are not available for use in the United States without paying income taxes, consisting of cash and cash equivalents of $25.0 million, short-term investments of $12.5 million and long-term investments of $10.1 million, a decrease of $2.5 million from $50.1 million as of December 31, 2012. This $47.6 million consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $25.0 million, short-term investments of $12.5 million and long-term investments of $10.1 million. In 2013 cash and cash equivalents decreased $5.7 million. Short-term and long-term investments increased by $3.2 million to $22.6 million from $19.5 million. The $5.7 million combined decrease in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to net cash provided by operating activities of $2.5 $2.5 million, offset by net cash used in investing activities of $6.2$6.2 million and net cash used in financing activities of $2.5 million. Short-term and long-term investments increased by $3.2 million to $22.6 million from $19.5 million. As of December 31, 2013, we and

36

TABLE OF CONTENTS

our consolidated joint ventures held approximately $18.7 million in cash and investments in foreign bank accounts which areis not available for use in the United States without paying United States income taxes.


Cash and cash equivalents and short-term and long-term investments increased $9.5 million to $50.1 million as of December 31, 2012 from $40.6 million as of December 31, 2011. The $4.5 million combined increase in cash and cash equivalents was primarily due to net cash provided by operating activities of $21.3 million, offset by net cash used in investing activities of $13.2 million and net cash used in financing activities of $3.8 million. Short-term and long-term investments increased by $5.0 million to $19.5 million from $14.5 million.

Net cash provided by operating activities of $2.5$3.8 million for 2014 was primarily comprised of our net loss of $697,000, adjusted for non-cash items of depreciation and amortization of $5.6 million, stock-based compensation of $1.1 million, provision for doubtful accounts of $9,000, amortization of marketable securities premium of $432,000, offset by gain on sales of investment of $1.3 million, a gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment of $13,000 and a net change of $1.4 million in assets and liabilities. The $1.4 million net change in assets and liabilities primarily resulted from a $479,000 decrease in inventories, a $2.4 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets, offset by a $3.0 million increase in accounts receivable, a $255,000 increase in other assets, a $979,000 decrease in accounts payable, a $742,000 increase in accrued liabilities and a $833,000 decrease in other long-term liabilities.

Net cash provided by operating activities of $2.5 million for 2013 was primarily comprised of our net loss of $6.8 million, adjusted for non-cash items of depreciation and amortization of $5.5 million, stock‑basedstock-based compensation of $1.3 million, provision for doubtful accounts of $869,000, amortization of marketable securities premium of $518,000, offset by gain on sale of cost method investment of $811,000, a gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment of $9,000 and a net change of $2.0$2.0 million in assets and liabilities. The $2.0$2.0 million net change in assets and liabilities primarily resulted from a $1.4 million decrease in inventories, a $645,000 $645,000 increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $2.2 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $1.9 million increase in other assets, a $2.2 million increase in accounts payable, a $899,000 decrease in accrued liabilities and a $373,000 decrease in other long-term liabilities.


Net cash provided by operating activities of $21.3 million for 2012 was primarily comprised of our net income of $6.2 million, adjusted for non-cash items of depreciation and amortization of $3.9 million, stock‑basedstock-based compensation of $1.2 million, amortization of marketable securities premium of $323,000, a loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment of $195,000 and a net change of $9.5 million in assets and liabilities. The $9.5 million net change in assets and liabilities primarily resulted from a $5.7 million decrease in inventories, a $1.8 million decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a $54,000 decrease in accounts receivable, a $174,000 increase in other assets, a $2.6 million increase in accounts payable, a $461,000 increase in accrued liabilities and a $900,000 decrease in other long-term liabilities.


Net cash provided by operatinginvesting activities of $18.1 million$142,000 for 20112014 was primarily comprised of our net income of $25.8 million, adjusted for non-cash items of depreciation and amortization of $3.4 million, stock‑based compensation of $896,000, amortization of marketable securities premium of $368,000, a realized loss onfrom the sale of investments totaling $13.9 million offset by the purchase of $8,000investments totaling $11.8 million and a net changethe purchase of $12.4 million in assetsproperty, plant and liabilities. The $12.4 million net change in assets and liabilities primarily resulted from a $9.8 million increase in inventories, a $4.0 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, a $3.3 million increase in prepaid expenses, other current assets and a $781,000 decrease in other long-term liabilities, a $5.2 million decrease in accounts receivable and a $426,000 decrease in other assets.


equipment of $2.0 million.

Net cash used in investing activities of $6.2$6.2 million for 2013 was primarily from the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $5.4 million mainly infor our China facilities and the purchase of investments totaling $14.1 million offset by the sale of investments totaling $12.5 million.


Net cash used in investing activities of $13.2 million for 2012 was primarily from the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $7.1 million mainly in our China facilities, loan from our consolidated joint venture to its equity investment entity of $875,000 and the purchase of investments totaling $12.1 million offset by the sale of investments totaling $6.9 million.


Net cash used in investing activities of $15.4 million for 2011 was primarily from the purchase of property, plant and equipment of $13.1 million mainly in capital projects at our China facilities, investments in new joint ventures of $3.0 million, loans from our consolidated joint ventures to their equity investment entities of $1.6 million offset by net proceeds from investment securities totaling $2.2 million.
In January 2012, we agreed with the Administrative Commission of Tianjin Economy and Technology Development Zone to establish a second manufacturing facility in Tianjin, China. The arrangement, if completed, would provide us with land use rights for approximately 32 acres of industrial land located in Yixian Scientific and Industrial Park to construct a compound semiconductor substrate manufacturing facility that would be completed in phases over a number of years. We agreed to provide $12.5 million in the first phase of the construction of the facility and have an understanding with our BoYu joint venture that it will provide the RMB 32.0 million, or approximately $5.0 million, that is anticipated to be required for the portion of the project devoted to crystal support, in exchange for land use rights, enterprise and individual income tax rebates, employee hiring and development subsidies, and other benefits. We expect to fund the first phase of the construction of the facility with cash flow generated by our normal operations supplemented by our existing line of credit. However, we have delayed our participation in the project at this time due to the volatility in our substrate business. It is possible that the investment of $5.0 million will still be funded by our BoYu joint venture for crystal support.

In January 2012, we increased the credit facility line of credit, secured by the marketable securities, with a bank from $3.0 million to $10.0 million at an annual interest rate of 1.65% above the current 30-day LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate). As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, we had not used the line of credit.


Net cash used in financing activities was $32,000 for 2014, which consisted of $166,000 net dividends paid by our consolidated joint ventures, partially offset by net proceeds of $134,000 on the issuance of common stock pursuant to stock option exercises.

Net cash used in financing activities was $2.5 million for 2013, which consisted of $2.3 million net dividends paid by our consolidated joint ventures and $716,000 of repurchases of shares of our common stock, partially offset by net proceeds of $532,000$532,000 on the issuance of common stock pursuant to stock option exercises.

Net cash used in financing activities was $3.8 million for 2012, which consisted of $4.1 million net dividends paid by our consolidated joint ventures, partially offset by net proceeds of $294,000 on the issuance of common stock pursuant to stock option exercises.


Net cash used in financing activities was $999,000 for 2011 consisted of $1.6 million of dividends paid by joint ventures, offset by $637,000 from the proceeds from the exercise of employee stock options.

37


On September 13, 2011, our registration statement on Form S-3 was declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). We may from time to time offer up to $60.0 million of common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, warrants, debt securities and/or units in one or more offerings and in any combination. We intend to use the net proceeds from any sale of securities under the shelf registration statement for general corporate purposes, which may include capital expenditures in connection with our planned expansion of our manufacturing facilities in China.  The timing of any offering will be at our discretion and will depend on many factors, including the prevailing market conditions.  Specific terms and share prices of any future offering under the registration statement will be established at the time of any such offering, and will be described in a prospectus supplement that we will file with the SEC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


On February 21, 2013, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that complies with Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, authorizing uspursuant to purchasewhich we may repurchase up to $6.0 million of our outstanding common stock. The timing, actual numberstock through February 27, 2014. These purchases can be made from time to time in the open market and value of the shares that are repurchased under this program are dependent on market conditions and other corporate considerations, including price, corporate and regulatory requirements and alternative investment opportunities. The program is funded from our existing cash balances and cash generated from operations. We are not obligated to repurchase any particular amount of common stock during any period and may choose to suspend or discontinue the repurchase program at any time. During 2013, we repurchased approximately 285,000 shares at an average price of $2.51 per share for a total purchase price of $716,000 under the stock repurchase program. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $5.3 million remained available for future repurchases under this program.

No shares were repurchased in 2014 under this program and the plan expired on February 27, 2014.

On October 27, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up to $5.0 million of our outstanding common stock. These purchases can be made from time to time in the open market and are funded from our existing cash balances and cash generated from operations. See Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities in Part II.

We believe that we have adequate cash and investments to meet our needs over the next 12 months. If our sales decrease, however, our ability to generate cash from operations will be adversely affected which could adversely affect our future liquidity, require us to use cash at a more rapid rate than expected, and require us to seek additional capital. There can be no assurance that such additional capital will be available or, if available it will be on terms acceptable to us.


Cash from operations could be affected by various risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to those set forth below under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” above.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements and have never established any special purpose entities. We have not entered into any options on non-financial assets.


Contractual Obligations

We lease certain office space, manufacturing facilities and equipment under long-term operating leases expiring at various dates through February 2016.December 2025. The lease agreement for the facility at Fremont, California with approximately 27,760 square feet commenced on December 1, 2008 for a term of seven years, with an option by us to cancel the lease after five years, upon forfeiture of the security deposit and payment of one-half of the fifth year’s rent. On June 28, 2013, we sent a notice to terminate the lease effective November 30, 2013 with an early termination penalty of $142,000 which was recorded as an expense in the third quarter of 2013. On August 2, 2013, we signed a new lease agreement for the current facility with reduced footage of 20,767 square feet, which commenced on December 1, 2013 for a term of two years. The reduced square footage, the reduced rate per square foot, and the expected reduced operating costs, would save us approximately $382,000 during 2014 and 2015.Total2015. In September 2014, we signed an amendment to the current lease to further reduce square footage to 19,467 square feet and to extend the term of the lease two more years. Total rent expenses under these operating leases were approximately $260,000, $638,000 $447,000 and $460,000$447,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively.

We entered into a royalty agreement with a vendorcompetitor effective December 3, 2010 with a term of eight years, terminating December 31, 2018. We and our related companies are granted a worldwide, nonexclusive, royalty bearing, irrevocable license to certain patents for the term on the agreement. We shall pay a total of $7.0 million royalty payment over eight years that began in 2011 based on future royalty bearing sales. This agreement contains a clause that allows us to claim for credit, starting in 2013, in the event that the royalty bearing sales for the year is lower than a pre-determined amount set forth in this agreement. Royalty expense under this agreement was $577,000 which was net of claim for 2013 wascredit of $223,000 and $530,000 which was net of claim for credit of $270,000 $1.4 million and $1.3 millionfor the years ended December 31, 20122014 and 2011, respectively, and2013, respectively. Royalty expense was $1.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012. These expenses were included in cost of revenue.

38

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 20132014 (in thousands):


 
 Payments due by period 
Contractual Obligations Total  Less than 1 year  
1-3
years
  
3-5
years
  
More than
5 years
 
Operating leases $438  $174  $174  $38  $52 
Royalty agreement  3,325   800   1,375   1,150    
Total $3,763  $974  $1,549  $1,188  $52 

Payments due by period
Contractual Obligations
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3
years
3-5
years
More than
5 years
Operating leases
$
766
 
$
260
 
$
323
 
$
57
 
$
126
 
Royalty agreement
 
2,525
 
 
800
 
 
1,150
 
 
575
 
 
 
Total
$
3,291
 
$
1,060
 
$
1,473
 
$
632
 
$
126
 


Selected Quarterly Results of Operations


The following table sets forth unaudited quarterly results for the eight quarters ended December 31, 2013.2014. The information for each of these quarters is unaudited but has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements. We believe that all necessary adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included in the amounts stated below to present fairly such quarterly information. The operating results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.

Quarters Ended
(in thousands, except
for per share amounts)
Dec. 31,
2014
Sept. 30,
2014
June 30,
2014
Mar. 31,
2014
Dec. 31,
2013
Sept. 30,
2013
June 30,
2013
Mar. 31,
2013
Revenue
$
19,567
 
$
23,138
 
$
21,449
 
$
19,345
 
$
18,603
 
$
20,521
 
$
23,831
 
$
22,380
 
Cost of revenue
 
14,596
 
 
17,820
 
 
17,289
 
 
16,627
 
 
15,790
 
 
18,075
 
 
20,746
 
 
18,896
 
Gross profit
 
4,971
 
 
5,318
 
 
4,160
 
 
2,718
 
 
2,813
 
 
2,446
 
 
3,085
 
 
3,484
 
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling, general and administrative
 
4,341
 
 
3,505
 
 
3,688
 
 
3,436
 
 
3,631
 
 
4,303
 
 
4,207
 
 
3,925
 
Research and development
 
1,222
 
 
1,160
 
 
987
 
 
775
 
 
797
 
 
766
 
 
1,039
 
 
822
 
Restructuring charge
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
907
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating expenses
 
5,563
 
 
4,665
 
 
4,675
 
 
5,118
 
 
4,428
 
 
5,069
 
 
5,246
 
 
4,747
 
Income (loss) from operations
 
(592
)
 
653
 
 
(515
)
 
(2,400
)
 
(1,615
)
 
(2,623
)
 
(2,161
)
 
(1,263
)
Interest income, net
 
123
 
 
106
 
 
127
 
 
127
 
 
272
 
 
55
 
 
50
 
 
31
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
 
26
 
 
390
 
 
625
 
 
487
 
 
278
 
 
346
 
 
471
 
 
282
 
Other income (expense), net
 
111
 
 
(236
)
 
476
 
 
10
 
 
(257
)
 
(47
)
 
381
 
 
(825
)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
 
(332
)
 
913
 
 
713
 
 
(1,776
)
 
(1,322
)
 
(2,269
)
 
(1,259
)
 
(1,775
)
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
 
(39
)
 
43
 
 
152
 
 
59
 
 
(134
)
 
(204
)
 
(342
)
 
184
 
Net income (loss)
 
(293
)
 
870
 
 
561
 
 
(1,835
)
 
(1,188
)
 
(2,065
)
 
(1,601
)
 
(1,959
)
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
(18
)
 
(226
)
 
(242
)
 
(205
)
 
(40
)
 
(230
)
 
(434
)
 
(441
)
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc
$
(311
)
$
644
 
$
319
 
$
(2,040
)
$
(1,228
)
$
(2,295
)
$
(2,035
)
$
(2,400
)
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc. per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
(0.01
)
$
0.02
 
$
0.01
 
$
(0.06
)
$
(0.04
)
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.06
)
$
(0.08
)
Diluted
$
(0.01
)
$
0.02
 
$
0.01
 
$
(0.06
)
$
(0.04
)
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.06
)
$
(0.08
)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
32,558
 
 
32,504
 
 
32,381
 
 
32,364
 
 
32,628
 
 
32,366
 
 
32,382
 
 
32,297
 
Diluted
 
32,558
 
 
32,738
 
 
32,597
 
 
32,364
 
 
32,628
 
 
32,366
 
 
32,382
 
 
32,297
 

 
 Quarters Ended 
(in thousands, except for per share amounts) 
Dec. 31,
2013
  
Sept. 30,
2013
  
June 30,
2013
  
Mar. 31,
2013
  
Dec. 31,
2012
  
Sept. 30,
2012
  
June 30,
2012
  
Mar. 31,
2012
 
Revenue $18,603  $20,521  $23,831  $22,380  $18,927  $20,808  $25,153  $23,486 
Cost of revenue  15,790   18,075   20,746   18,896   15,243   15,342   17,645   15,292 
Gross profit  2,813   2,446   3,085   3,484   3,684   5,466   7,508   8,194 
Operating expenses:                                
Selling, general and administrative  3,631   4,303   4,207   3,925   3,710   3,950   3,974   3,785 
Research and development  797   766   1,039   822   875   844   914   835 
Total operating expenses  4,428   5,069   5,246   4,747   4,585   4,794   4,888   4,620 
Income (loss) from operations  (1,615)  (2,623)  (2,161)  (1,263)  (901)  672   2,620   3,574 
Interest income, net  272   55   50   31   316   52   62   88 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures  278   346   471   282   495   348   284   154 
Other income (expense), net  (257)  (47)  381   (825)  (289)  144   (127)  (489)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  (1,322)  (2,269)  (1,259)  (1,775)  (379)  1,216   2,839   3,327 
Provision for (benefit from) income
taxes
  (134)  (204)  (342)  
184
   
294
   (228)  
412
   
375
 
Net income (loss)  (1,188)  (2,065)  (1,601)  (1,959)  (673)  1,444   2,427   2,952 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  (40)  (230)  (434)  (441)  (83)  (512)  (1,128)  (1,317)
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc $(1,228) $(2,295) $(2,035) $(2,400) $(756) $932  $1,299  $1,635 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc. per common share:                                
Basic $(0.04) $(0.07) $(0.06) $(0.08) $(0.02) $0.03  $0.04  $0.05 
Diluted $(0.04) $(0.07) $(0.06) $(0.08) $(0.02) $0.03  $0.04  $0.05 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:                                
Basic  32,628   32,366   32,382   32,297   32,220   32,183   32,138   32,034 
Diluted  32,628   32,366   32,382   32,297   32,220   32,769   32,944   33,018 

39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are detailed in Note 1 to our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Foreign Currency Risk

A significant portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Foreign exchange losses could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flows. If we do not effectively manage the risks associated with this currency risk, our revenue, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected. During 2014, we recorded net foreign exchange losses of $1.0 million, included as part of other income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of operations. In addition, we recorded unrealized foreign currency charges of $377,000 related to financial statement translations which are included in the balance of “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets. We incurred foreign currency transaction exchange gains and losses due to operations in general. In the future we may experience foreign exchange losses on our non-functional currency denominated receivables and payables to the extent that we have not mitigated our exposure. Foreign exchange losses could have a materially adverse effect on our operating results and cash flows.

Our product sales to Japanese customers are typically invoiced in Japanese yen. As such we have foreign exchange exposure on our accounts receivable and on any Japanese yen denominated cash deposits. In 2014, the yen depreciated against the dollar, moving from approximately 105.24 to 119.95. The major portion of our 2014 exchange loss is attributable to the yen’s movement.

The functional currency for our foreign operations is the Renminbi, the local currency of China. Since most of our operations are conducted in China, most of our costs are incurred in Chinese Renminbi, which subjects us to fluctuations in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and the Chinese Renminbi. We incur transaction gains or losses resulting from consolidation of expenses incurred in local currencies for our Chinese subsidiaries, including our joint ventures, as well as in translation of the assets and liabilities at each balance sheet date. Our financial results could be adversely affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets, including the revaluation by China of the Renminbi, and any future adjustments that China may make to its currency such as any move it might make to a managed float systemssystem with opportunistic interventions. We may also experience foreign exchange losses on our non-functional currency denominated receivables and payables to the extent that we have not mitigated our exposure utilizing foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Foreign exchange losses could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and cash flows. If we do not effectively manage the risks associated with this currency risk, our revenue, cash flows and financial condition could be adversely affected.


We manage against these risks by actively monitoring the exchange rate exposure. Our foreign operations, however, in most instances act as a natural hedge since both operating expenses as well as revenues and both assets and liabilities are generally denominated in their respective local currency. In these instances, although an unfavorable change in the exchange rate of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar will result in lower revenues when translated into U.S. dollars, the operating expenses will be lower as well. We do not use short-term forward exchange contracts for hedging purposes to reduce the effects of adverse foreign exchange rate movements. We cannot be certain that any such hedging activities will be effective, or available to us at commercially reasonable rates. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had no outstanding commitments with respect to foreign exchange contracts.

During 2013, we recorded net realized foreign exchange losses of $1.3 million, included as part of other income (expense), net in our consolidated statements of operations. We incurred foreign currency transaction exchange gains and losses due to operations in general. In the future we may experience foreign exchange losses on our non-functional currency denominated receivables and payables to the extent that we have not mitigated our exposure utilizing foreign currency forward exchange contracts. Foreign exchange losses could have a materially adverse effect on our operating results and cash flows. During 2013, we recorded unrealized foreign currency gains of $1.6 million related to currency translation which are included in the balance of “accumulated other comprehensive income” on our consolidated balance sheets.
payables.

Interest Rate Risk

Cash and cash equivalents earning interest and certain variable rate debt instruments are subject to interest rate fluctuations. The following table sets forth the probable impact of a 10% change in interest rates (in thousands):

Instrument 
Balance as of
December 31,
2013
  
Current
Interest
Rate
  
Projected Annual
Interest
Income/(Expense)
  
Proforma 10%
Interest Rate
Decline
Income/(Expense)
  
Proforma 10%
Interest Rate
Increase
Income/(Expense)
 
Cash $24,852   0.67% $167  $150  $123 
Cash equivalents  109   0.02   0   0   0 
Investment in debt and equity instruments  22,644   3.07   695   626   765 
 
         $862  $776  $948 

Instrument
Balance as of
December 31,
2014
Current
Interest
Rate
Projected Annual
Interest
Income/(Expense)
Proforma 10%
Interest Rate
Decline
Income/(Expense)
Proforma 10%
Interest Rate
Increase
Income/(Expense)
Cash
$
28,791
 
 
0.75
%
$
216
 
$
194
 
$
238
 
Cash equivalents
 
23
 
 
0.01
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
 
0
 
Investment in debt and equity instruments
 
19,369
 
 
2.76
 
 
535
 
 
481
 
 
588
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
751
 
$
675
 
$
826
 

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing income without significantly increasing risk. Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and trade accounts receivable. We invest primarily in money market accounts, certificates of deposits, corporate bonds and notes, and government securities. We are exposed to credit risks in the event of default by the issuers to the extent of the amount recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. These securities are generally classified as available-for-sale and consequently are recorded on the

40

TABLE OF CONTENTS

balance sheet at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of estimated tax. Our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments and long-term investments are in high-quality securities placed with major banks and financial institutions and commercial paper. We have no investments in auction rate securities.


Credit Risk

We perform periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and generally do not require collateral. OneTwo customers accounted for 11% and 10% of our trade accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2014 while one customer accounted for 20% of our trade accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2013. One customer accounted for 28% of our trade accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2012.

Equity Risk


We maintain minority investments directly, and indirectly through our consolidated joint ventures in privately-held companies located in China. These minority investments are reviewed for other than temporary declines in value on a quarterly basis. These investments are classified as other assets in the consolidated balance sheets and are either accounted for under the cost method or under the equity method consolidated through joint ventures as we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over their operations. We monitor our investments for impairment and record reductions in carrying value when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Reasons for other than temporary declines in value include whether the related company would have insufficient cash flow to operate for the next twelve12 months, significant changes in the operating performance and changes in market conditions. As of and December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, the direct minority investments totaled $325,000$200,000 and 392,000, respectively,$325,000, and the indirect minority investments by our consolidated joint ventures totaled $4.0 million and $3.4 million, and $2.0 million, respectively.


Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The consolidated financial statements, related notes thereto and financial statement schedule required by this item are listed and set forth beginning on page 48,47, and are incorporated by reference here. Supplementary financial information regarding quarterly financial information required by this item is set forth under the caption “Selected Quarterly Results of Operations” in Item 7.7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and is incorporated by reference here.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and ourinterim Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer andinterim Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as defined under Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) were effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission and is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our interimChief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our disclosure controls and procedures include components of our internal control over financial reporting. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is expressed at the level of reasonable assurance because a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met.


Management’s report on internal control over financial reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief

41

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Financial Officer, and implemented by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and interim Chief Financial Officer, has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20132014 based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013.

2014.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc. has audited the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and has issued its report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013.

2014.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 20132014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None.

None.
REPORT

42

CONTENTS



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of


AXT, Inc.

We have audited theAXT, Inc. and its subsidiaries’ (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting of AXT, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting appearing in item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’scompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.


We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, andrisk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.


A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.


In our opinion, AXT, Inc. and its subsidiariesthe Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO criteria.


COSO.

We have also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AXT, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20132014 and our report dated March 14, 201413, 2015, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

opinion.

/s/ Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.


San Jose, California


March 14, 2014
13, 2015



43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART III

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) allows us to include information required in this report by referring to other documents or reports we have already or will soon be filing. This is called “Incorporation by Reference.” We intend to file our definitive proxy statement for our annual meeting of stockholders to be held on May 13, 201421, 2015 (the “Proxy Statement”) pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, and certain information therein is incorporated in this report by reference.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required by this item with respect to identification of directors is incorporated by reference to the information contained in the section captioned “Information About our Board of Directors” in the Proxy Statement. The information with respect to our executive officers, is incorporated by reference to the information contained in the section captioned “Executive Officers” in the Proxy Statement. Information with respect to Items 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference to the information contained in the sections of the Proxy Statement captioned “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.” There will be no disclosure under Item 407(c)(3). Information with respect to Items 407(d)(4) and 407(d)(5) is incorporated by reference to the information contained in the sections of the Proxy Statement captioned “Corporate Governance—Committees of the Board of Directors.”

The Board of Directors of AXT, Inc. has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to our principal executive officers, principal financial officer, and corporate controller, as well as other employees. A copy of this Code has been posted on our Internet website at www.axt.com. Any amendments to, or waivers from, a provision of our Code that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or persons performing similar functions and that relates to any element of the Code enumerated in paragraph (b) of Item 406 of Regulation S-K shall be disclosed by posting such information on our website.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to information set forth in our Proxy Statement under the section entitled “Executive Compensation and Other Matters.”

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to information set forth in our Proxy Statement under the section entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence

Information required by this item will be set forth in our Proxy Statement under the headings “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The information required by this Item is incorporated herein by reference to information set forth in our Proxy Statement under the section entitled “Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accountants.”

44

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1)Financial Statements:

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

47
48
49
50
51
52
53

(2)Financial Statement Schedules

All schedules have been omitted because the required information is not applicable or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(b)Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits attached elsewhere to this Form 10-K. The exhibits listed in the accompanying Index to Exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this report on Form 10-K.

45

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of


AXT, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AXT, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. These2014. The Company’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.


We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of AXT, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013,2014, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.


We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013,2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 14, 201413, 2015, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.


opinion.

/s/ Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc.

San Jose, California


March 14, 2014
13, 2015

46

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AXT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


(In thousands, except per share data)

December 31,
2014
2013
ASSETS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
28,814
 
$
24,961
 
Short-term investments
 
12,340
 
 
12,499
 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $823 and $1,054 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
17,864
 
 
14,943
 
Inventories
 
38,574
 
 
39,127
 
Related party notes receivable - current
 
171
 
 
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
5,430
 
 
8,010
 
Total current assets
 
103,193
 
 
99,540
 
Long-term investments
 
7,783
 
 
10,145
 
Property, plant and equipment, net
 
33,862
 
 
37,621
 
Related party notes receivable – long-term
 
1,704
 
 
1,715
 
Other assets
 
14,975
 
 
14,801
 
Total assets
$
161,517
 
$
163,822
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
 
 
 
 
 
Current liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts payable
$
7,137
 
$
8,140
 
Accrued liabilities
 
7,634
 
 
7,286
 
Total current liabilities
 
14,771
 
 
15,426
 
Long-term portion of royalty payments
 
1,725
 
 
2,525
 
Other long-term liabilities
 
333
 
 
325
 
Total liabilities
 
16,829
 
 
18,276
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stockholders’ equity:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; 883 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 (Liquidation preference of $6.3 million and $6.1 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013)
 
3,532
 
 
3,532
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 70,000 shares authorized; 32,837 and 32,605 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013
 
32
 
 
32
 
Additional paid-in-capital
 
195,419
 
 
194,156
 
Accumulated deficit
 
(68,393
)
 
(67,005
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income
 
7,673
 
 
8,953
 
Total AXT, Inc. stockholders’ equity
 
138,263
 
 
139,668
 
Noncontrolling interests
 
6,425
 
 
5,878
 
Total stockholders’ equity
 
144,688
 
 
145,546
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
161,517
 
$
163,822
 
 
 
December 31,
 
 
 
2013
  
2012
 
ASSETS 
  
 
Current assets 
  
 
Cash and cash equivalents $24,961  $30,634 
Short-term investments  12,499   10,270 
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $1,054 and $245 as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively  14,943   17,912 
Inventories  39,127   40,352 
Related party notes receivable - current     2,036 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  8,010   5,268 
Total current assets  99,540   106,472 
Long-term investments  10,145   9,191 
Property, plant and equipment, net  37,621   37,235 
Related party notes receivable – long-term  1,715   416 
Other assets  14,801   14,275 
Total assets $163,822   167,589 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY        
Current liabilities        
Accounts payable $8,140  $5,894 
Accrued liabilities  7,286   7,202 
Total current liabilities  15,426   13,096 
Long-term portion of royalty payments  2,525   3,325 
Other long-term liabilities  325   254 
Total liabilities  18,276   16,675 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)        
Stockholders’ equity:        
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 2,000 shares authorized; 883 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 (Liquidation preference of $6.1 million and $5.9 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively)  3,532   3,532 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 70,000 shares authorized; 32,605 and 32,471 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively  32   32 
Additional paid-in-capital  194,156   193,063 
Accumulated deficit  (67,005)  (59,047)
Accumulated other comprehensive income  8,953   6,033 
Total AXT, Inc. stockholders’ equity  139,668   143,613 
Noncontrolling interests  5,878   7,301 
Total stockholders’ equity  145,546   150,914 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $163,822  $167,589 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AXT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS


(In thousands, except per share data)

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Revenue
$
83,499
 
$
85,335
 
$
88,374
 
Cost of revenue
 
66,332
 
 
73,507
 
 
63,522
 
Gross profit
 
17,167
 
 
11,828
 
 
24,852
 
Operating expenses:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling, general, and administrative
 
14,970
 
 
16,066
 
 
15,419
 
Research and development
 
4,144
 
 
3,424
 
 
3,468
 
Restructuring charge
 
907
 
 
 
 
 
Total operating expenses
 
20,021
 
 
19,490
 
 
18,887
 
Income (loss) from operations
 
(2,854
)
 
(7,662
)
 
5,965
 
Interest income, net
 
483
 
 
408
 
 
518
 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures
 
1,528
 
 
1,377
 
 
1,281
 
Other income (expense), net
 
361
 
 
(748
)
 
(761
)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes
 
(482
)
 
(6,625
)
 
7,003
 
Provision for income taxes
 
215
 
 
188
 
 
853
 
Net income (loss)
 
(697
)
 
(6,813
)
 
6,150
 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
(691
)
 
(1,145
)
 
(3,040
)
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc
$
(1,388
)
$
(7,958
)
$
3,110
 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc. per common share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.25
)
$
0.09
 
Diluted
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.25
)
$
0.09
 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Basic
 
32,452
 
 
32,700
 
 
32,144
 
Diluted
 
32,452
 
 
32,700
 
 
32,865
 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
 
 
 
Revenue $85,335  $88,374  $104,121 
Cost of revenue  73,507   63,522   59,339 
Gross profit  11,828   24,852   44,782 
Operating expenses:            
Selling, general, and administrative  16,066   15,419   14,836 
Research and development  3,424   3,468   2,473 
Total operating expenses  19,490   18,887   17,309 
Income (loss) from operations  (7,662)  5,965   27,473 
Interest income, net  408   518   449 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures  1,377   1,281   741 
Other income (expense), net  (748)  (761)  (45)
Income (loss) before provision for income taxes  (6,625)  7,003   28,618 
Provision for income taxes  188   853   2,795 
Net income (loss)  (6,813)  6,150   25,823 
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest  1,145   3,040   5,503 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc $(7,958) $3,110  $20,320 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc. per common share:            
Basic $(0.25) $0.09  $0.63 
Diluted $(0.25) $0.09  $0.61 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:            
Basic  32,700   32,144   31,872 
Diluted  32,700   32,865   33,061 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AXT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)


(In thousands)

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Net Income (loss)
$
(697
)
$
(6,813
)
$
6,150
 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax
 
(377
)
 
1,568
 
 
207
 
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments, net of tax
 
(964
)
 
1,682
 
 
85
 
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
 
(1,341
)
 
3,250
 
 
292
 
Comprehensive income (loss)
 
(2,038
)
 
(3,563
)
 
6,442
 
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest
 
(630
)
 
(1,475
)
 
(3,117
)
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc
$
(2,668
)
$
(5,038
)
$
3,325
 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
 
 
 
Net Income (loss) $(6,813) $6,150  $25,823 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:            
Change in cumulative foreign currency translation adjustment, net of tax  1,568   207   1,686 
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for-sale investments, net of tax  1,682   85   (161)
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax  3,250   292   1,525 
Comprehensive income (loss)  (3,563)  6,442   27,348 
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest  1,475   3,117   5,862 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc $(5,038) $3,325  $21,486 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AXT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY


(In thousands)

Common Stock
Preferred
Stock
Shares
$
Additional
Paid In
Capital
Accumulated
Deficit
Other
Comprehensive
Income/(loss)
AXT, Inc.
stockholders’
equity
Noncontrolling
interests
Total
stockholders’
equity
Shares
$
January 1, 2012
 
883
 
 
3,532
 
 
32,222
 
 
32
 
 
191,554
 
 
(62,157
)
 
5,818
 
 
138,779
 
 
8,270
 
 
147,049
 
Common stock options exercised
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
136
 
 
 
 
 
294
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
294
 
 
 
 
 
294
 
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,215
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,215
 
 
 
 
 
1,215
 
Issuance of common stock in the form of restricted stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
113
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3,110
 
 
 
 
 
3,110
 
 
3,040
 
 
6,150
 
Dividend declared by joint ventures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(4,086
)
 
(4,086
)
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on marketable
securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
85
 
 
85
 
 
 
 
 
85
 
Currency translation adjustment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
130
 
 
130
 
 
77
 
 
207
 
Balance as of December 31, 2012
 
883
 
 
3,532
 
 
32,471
 
 
32
 
 
193,063
 
 
(59,047
)
 
6,033
 
 
143,613
 
 
7,301
 
 
150,914
 
Common stock options exercised
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
331
 
 
 
 
 
532
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
532
 
 
 
 
 
532
 
Common stock repurchased
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(285
)
 
 
 
 
(716
)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(716
)
 
 
 
 
(716
)
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,277
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,277
 
 
 
 
 
1,277
 
Issuance of common stock in the form of restricted stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
88
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(7,958
)
 
 
 
 
(7,958
)
 
1,145
 
 
(6,813
)
Net dividend declared by joint ventures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(2,898
)
 
(2,898
)
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on marketable
securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,682
 
 
1,682
 
 
 
 
 
1,682
 
Currency translation adjustment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,238
 
 
1,238
 
 
330
 
 
1,568
 
Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
883
 
$
3,532
 
 
32,605
 
$
32
 
$
194,156
 
$
(67,005
)
$
8.953
 
$
139,668
 
$
5,878
 
$
145,546
 
Common stock options exercised
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
111
 
 
 
 
 
134
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
134
 
 
 
 
 
134
 
Common stock repurchased
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Stock-based compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,129
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1,129
 
 
 
 
 
1,129
 
Issuance of common stock in the form of restricted stock
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
121
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Comprehensive income:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1.388
)
 
 
 
 
(1,388
)
 
691
 
 
(697
)
Net dividend declared by joint ventures
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(83
)
 
(83
)
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on marketable
securities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(964
)
 
(964
)
 
 
 
 
(964
)
Currency translation adjustment
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(316
)
 
(316
)
 
(61
)
 
(377
)
Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
883
 
$
3,532
 
 
32,837
 
$
32
 
 
195,419
 
 
(68,393
)
 
7,673
 
 
(138,263
)
 
(6,425
)
 
144,688
 
 
 
  
Common Stock
  
  
  
  
  
 
 
 
Preferred
Stock
  
  
  
Additional
Paid In
  Accumulated  
Other
Comprehensive
  
AXT, Inc.
stockholders’
  Noncontrolling  
Total
stockholders’
 
 
 Shares  $  Shares  $  Capital  Deficit  Income/(loss)  equity  interests  equity 
 
 
 
January 1, 2011  883   3,532   31,877   32   190,021   (82,477)  4,652   115,760   4,044  $119,804 
Common stock options exercised          251       637           637       637 
Stock‑based compensation                  896           896       896 
Issuance of common stock in the form of restricted stock          94                             
Comprehensive income:                                        
Net income                      20,320       20,320   5,503   25,823 
Dividend declared by joint ventures                                  (1,636)  (1,636)
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities                          (161)  (161)      (161)
Currency translation adjustment                          1,327   1,327   359   1,686 
Balance as of December 31, 2011  883   3,532   32,222   32   191,554   (62,157)  5,818   138,779   8,270   147,049 
Common stock options exercised          136       294           294       294 
Stock‑based compensation                  1,215           1,215       1,215 
Issuance of common stock in the form of restricted stock          113                             
Comprehensive income:                                        
Net income                      3,110       3,110   3,040   6,150 
Dividend declared by joint ventures                                  (4,086)  (4,086)
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities                          85   85       85 
Currency translation adjustment                          130   130   77   207 
Balance as of December 31, 2012  883   3,532   32,471   32   193,063   (59,047)  6,033   143,613   7,301   150,914 
Common stock options exercised          331       532           532       532 
Common stock repurchased          (285)      (716)          (716)      (716)
Stock‑based compensation                  1,277           1,277       1,277 
Issuance of common stock in the form of restricted stock          88                             
Comprehensive income:                                        
Net income (loss)                      (7,958)      (7,958)  1,145   (6,813)
Net dividend declared by joint ventures                                  (2,898)  (2,898)
Change in unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities                          1,682   1,682       1,682 
Currency translation adjustment                          1,238   1,238   330   1,568 
Balance as of December 31, 2013  
883
  $3,532   
32,605
  $32  $194,156  $(67,005) $8.953  $139,668  $5,878  $145,546 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AXT, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS


(In thousands)

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss)
$
(697
)
$
(6,813
)
$
6,150
 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Depreciation and amortization
 
5,639
 
 
5,470
 
 
3,927
 
Amortization of marketable securities premium
 
432
 
 
518
 
 
323
 
Stock-based compensation
 
1,129
 
 
1,277
 
 
1,215
 
Provision for doubtful accounts
 
9
 
 
869
 
 
 
Realized gain on sale of investments
 
(1,263
)
 
 
 
 
Gain on sale of cost method investment
 
 
 
(811
)
 
 
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment
 
(13
)
 
(9
)
 
195
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accounts receivable, net
 
(2,959
)
 
2,160
 
 
54
 
Inventories
 
479
 
 
1,439
 
 
5,659
 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
 
2,393
 
 
(645
)
 
1,784
 
Other assets
 
(255
)
 
(1,859
)
 
(174
)
Accounts payable
 
(979
)
 
2,185
 
 
2,608
 
Accrued liabilities
 
742
 
 
(899
)
 
461
 
Other long-term liabilities
 
(833
)
 
(373
)
 
(900
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
3,824
 
 
2,509
 
 
21,302
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
 
(1,971
)
 
(5,424
)
 
(7,079
)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment
 
13
 
 
 
 
2
 
Purchases of available for sale securities
 
(11,828
)
 
(14,092
)
 
(12,116
)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available for sale securities
 
13,928
 
 
12,486
 
 
6,900
 
Repayment from (Loans to) related parties
 
 
 
818
 
 
(875
)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
 
142
 
 
(6,212
)
 
(13,168
)
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Proceeds from common stock options exercised
 
134
 
 
532
 
 
294
 
Repurchase of the Company’s common stock, including commission
 
 
 
(716
)
 
 
Dividends paid by joint ventures
 
(166
)
 
(2,329
)
 
(4,086
)
Net cash used in financing activities
 
(32
)
 
(2,513
)
 
(3,792
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 
(81
)
 
543
 
 
136
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
 
3,853
 
 
(5,673
)
 
4,478
 
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
 
24,961
 
 
30,634
 
 
26,156
 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year
$
28,814
 
$
24,961
 
$
30,634
 
Supplemental disclosures:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Income taxes paid
$
293
 
$
782
 
$
1,729
 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
Cash flows from operating activities: 
  
  
 
Net income (loss) $(6,813) $6,150  $25,823 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations:            
Depreciation and amortization  5,470   3,927   3,410 
Amortization of marketable securities premium  518   323   368 
Stock‑based compensation  1,277   1,215   896 
Provision for doubtful accounts  869       
Realized loss (gain) on sale of investments        8 
Gain on sale of cost method investment  (811)      
Loss (gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment  (9)  195   6 
Changes in assets and liabilities:            
Accounts receivable, net  2,160   54   5,165 
Inventories  1,439   5,659   (9,839)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  (645)  1,784   (3,313)
Other assets  (1,859)  (174)  426 
Accounts payable  2,185   2,608   (3,840)
Accrued liabilities  (899)  461   (197)
Other long-term liabilities  (373)  (900)  (781)
Net cash provided by operating activities  2,509   21,302   18,132 
Cash flows from investing activities:            
Purchases of property, plant and equipment  (5,424)  (7,079)  (13,102)
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment     2   33 
Purchases of available for sale securities  (14,092)  (12,116)  (13,951)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of available for sale securities  12,486   6,900   16,179 
Investments in joint ventures        (3,024)
Repayment from (Loans to) related parties  818   (875)  (1,565)
Net cash used in investing activities  (6,212)  (13,168)  (15,430)
Cash flows from financing activities:            
Proceeds from common stock options exercised  532   294   637 
Repurchase of the Company’s common stock, including commission  (716)      
Dividends paid by joint ventures  (2,329)  (4,086)  (1,636)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (2,513)  (3,792)  (999)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  543   136   729 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (5,673)  4,478   2,432 
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year  30,634   26,156   23,724 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year $24,961  $30,634  $26,156 
Supplemental disclosures:            
Income taxes paid $782  $1,729  $3,234 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AXT, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The Company

AXT, Inc. (“AXT”, “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to AXT, Inc. and all of its subsidiaries) designs, develops, manufacturesis a worldwide developer and distributesproducer of high-performance compound and single element semiconductor substrates, also known as wafers. The dominant substrates used in producing semiconductor chips are made from silicon. However, certain chips may become too hot or perform their function too slowly if silicon is used as the base material. Alternative or specialty materials are used to replace silicon as the preferred base for the electronic circuit in these situations. We provide such alternative or specialty materials in the form of substrates or wafers, including compound and single element substrates. Our substrate productscompound substrates combine gallium with arsenic (GaAs) or combine indium with phosphorous (InP). Our single element substrates are used primarily in wireless communications, lighting display applications, and fiber optic communications. made from germanium (Ge).

We believemanufacture all of our semiconductor substrates using our proprietary vertical gradient freeze (VGF) technology. We manufacture all of our products in the People’s Republic of China (PRC or VGF, techniqueChina), which generally has favorable costs for manufacturing semiconductor substrates provides significant benefits over other methodsfacilities and enabledlabor compared with comparable facilities in the United States, Europe or Japan. Our supply chain includes AXT subsidiaries and joint ventures in China, which provide us to become a leading manufacturer of such substrates. We pioneered the commercial use of VGF technology to manufacture gallium arsenide (GaAs) substratespricing advantages, reliable supply and subsequently used VGF technology to manufacture substrates from indium phosphide (InP), and germanium (Ge). We also manufacture and sellenhanced sourcing lead-times for key raw materials relatedwhich are central to our substrate business through our joint ventures located in China.final manufactured products. These joint venturescompanies produce products including 99.99% pure gallium (4N Ga), high purity gallium, arsenic, and germanium, germanium dioxide, pyrolytic boron nitride (pBN) crucibles and boron oxide (B2O3). AXT’sOur ownership interestand the ownership held by our consolidated subsidiaries in these entities ranges from 20 percent20% to 83 percent.83%. We consolidate, for accounting purposes, the joint ventures in which we own ahave majority or controlling sharefinancial interest and significant influence on management, and employ equity method accounting for the joint ventures in which we have a smaller ownership interest. We purchase portions of the materials produced by these joint ventures for our own use and the joint ventures sell other portionsthe remainder of their production to third parties.

We use our direct sales force in the United States and China, and independent sales representatives in Europe and other parts of Asia to market and sell our substrates.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AXT, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co,Co., Ltd., and our majority‑ownedmajority-owned subsidiaries, Beijing JiYa Semiconductor Material Co., Ltd,Ltd., Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., LtdLtd. and Beijing BoYu Semiconductor Vessel Craftwork Technology Co., Ltd. All significant inter‑companyinter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Investments in business entities in which we do not have control, but have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies (generally 20-50% ownership), are accounted for by the equity method. For majority-owned subsidiaries, we reflect the noncontrolling interest of the portion we do not own on our condensed consolidated balance sheets in stockholders’ equity and in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates, judgments and assumptions. We believe that the estimates, judgments, and assumptions upon which it relies are reasonable based on information available at the time that these estimates, judgments, and assumptions are made. These estimates, judgments, and assumptions can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. To the extent there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our consolidated financial statements would be affected.


affected.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, short-term investments and long-term investments, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Certain cash equivalents and investments are required to be adjusted to fair value on a recurring basis. See Note 2.

52

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Fair Value of Investments


ASC topic 820, Fair value measurement (“ASC 820”) establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.


Level 1 instruments represent quoted prices in active markets. Therefore, determining fair value for Level 1 instruments does not require significant management judgment, and the estimation is not difficult.


Level 2 instruments include observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for identicalcomparable instruments in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), issuer credit ratings, non-binding market consensus prices that can be corroborated with observable market data, model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated with observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities, or quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities. These Level 2 instruments require more management judgment and subjectivity compared to Level 1 instruments, including:

Determining which instruments are most comparable to the instrument being priced requires management to identify a sample of similar securities based on the coupon rates, maturity, issuer, credit rating, and instrument type, and subjectively select an individual security or multiple securities that are deemed most similar to the security being priced.

Determining which model-derived valuations to use in determining fair value requires management judgment. When observable market prices for identical securities or comparable securities are not available, we price our marketable debt instruments using non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with observable market data or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow models, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data.
·Determining which instruments are most similar to the instrument being priced requires management to identify a sample of similar securities based on the coupon rates, maturity, issuer, credit rating, and instrument type, and subjectively select an individual security or multiple securities that are deemed most similar to the security being priced.

·Determining which model-derived valuations to use in determining fair value requires management judgment. When observable market prices for identical securities or similar securities are not available, we price our marketable debt instruments using non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with observable market data or pricing models, such as discounted cash flow models, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data.

Level 3 instruments include unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of fair value of assets or liabilities. The determination of fair value for Level 3 instruments requires the most management judgment and subjectivity. As of December 31, 2013,2014, we did not have any assets or liabilities required to be carried at fair value without observable market values that would require a high level of judgment to determine fair value (Level 3 assets).


Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currencies of our Chinese subsidiaries are the local currencies. Transaction gains and losses resulting from transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar or in the functional currencies of our subsidiaries are included in “other income (expense), net” for the periods presented. The transaction losses for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and 2011 totaled $1.0 million, $1.3 million and $445,000, and $1000,000 respectively.

The assets and liabilities of the subsidiaries are translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. Revenue and expense items are translated at the average rate of exchange for the period. Gains and losses from foreign currency translation are included in “other comprehensive income (loss)” in consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue upon the shipment of our products to customers when:

we have received a signed purchase order placed by our customers,
the price is fixed or determinable,
title and risk of ownership has transferred to our customers upon shipment from our dock, receipt at customer’s dock, or removal from consignment inventory at customer’s location,
collection of resulting receivables is probable, and
product returns are reasonably estimable.

We do not provide training, installation or commissioning services. Our terms and conditions of sale do not require customer acceptance. We assess the probability of collection based on a number of factors including past history with the customer and credit worthiness. We provide for future returns based on historical experience,

53

TABLE OF CONTENTS

current economic trends and changes in customer demand at the time revenue is recognized. Additionally, we do not provide payment discounts or other incentives to customers. We present our revenue net of any taxes assessed by any governmental authority.

Accounting for Sales Taxes in Net Revenues

We reportrecord sales taxes collected on sales of our products as a component of net revenues and for amounts not yet remitted to tax authorities as accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. The amount is immaterial for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Risks and Concentration of Credit Risk

Our business is very dependent on the semiconductor industry, which is highly cyclical and has historically experienced downturns as a result of economic changes, overcapacity, and technological advancements. Significant technological changes in the industry or customer requirements, or the emergence of competitive products with new capabilities or technologies, could adversely affect operating results. In addition, a significant portion of our revenues and net income is derived from international sales. Fluctuations of the United States dollar against foreign currencies and changes in local regulatory or economic conditions, particularly in an emerging market such as China, could adversely affect operating results.

We depend on a single or limited number of suppliers for certain critical materials used in the production of our substrates, such as quartz tubing and polishing solutions. We generally purchase these materials through standard purchase orders and not pursuant to long-term supply contracts.

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents, short-term investments, and trade accounts receivable. We invest primarily in money market accounts, commercial paper instruments, and investment grade securities with high quality financial institutions. The composition and maturities are regularly monitored by management. Such deposits are in excess of the amount of the insurance provided by the federal government on such deposits. We are exposed to credit risks in the event of default by the issuers to the extent of the amount recorded on the consolidated balance sheets.


We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition, and limit the amount of credit extended when deemed necessary, but generally do not require collateral. The credit risk in our accounts receivable is substantially mitigated by our credit evaluation process reasonably short collection terms and the geographical dispersion of sales transactions. One customerTwo customers accounted for 20%11% and 28%10% of our trade accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

2014. One customer accounted for 20% of our trade accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2013.

No customer represented more than 10% of our revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 while one customer represented 17% and 18% of revenue for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.2012. Our top five customers, although not the same five customers for each period, represented 34%, represented 31%, 37% and 35%37% of revenue for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. We expectbelieve that sales to a small number of customers will continue to comprise a significant portion of our revenue in the future.

future we could have a greater concentration of sales.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

We consider investments in highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

Short-Term and Long-Term Investments

We classify our investments in debt and equity securities as available-for-sale securities in accordance with ASC topic 320, Investments - Debt and Equity Securities (“ASC 320”). Short-term and long-term investments are comprised of available-for-sale marketable debt securities, which consist primarily of certificates of deposit, U.S. government securities, and investment-grade corporate notes and bonds. These investments are reported at fair value as of the respective balance sheet dates with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income within stockholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheets. The amortized cost of securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization is included in “other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of operations. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged to be other than temporary on available-for-sale securities are also included in “other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of operations. The cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method.

54

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Sales Returns

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and are not interest bearing. We periodically review the likelihood of collection on our accounts receivable balances and provide an allowance for doubtful accounts receivable primarily based upon the age of these accounts. We evaluate receivables from U.S. customers with an emphasis on balances in excess of 90 days and for receivables from customers located outside the U.S. with an emphasis on balances in excess of 120 days and establish areserve allowance on the receivable balances if needed. The reason for the difference in the evaluation of receivables between foreign and U.S. customers is that U.S. customers have historically made payments in a shorter period of time than foreign customers. Foreign business practices generally require us to allow customer payment terms that are longer than those accepted in the United States. We assess the probability of collection based on a number of factors, including the length of time a receivable balance has been outstanding, our past history with the customer and their credit worthiness.

We exercise judgment when determining the adequacy of these reserves as we evaluate historical bad debt trends, general economic conditions in the United States and internationally, and changes in customer financial conditions. Uncollectible receivables are recorded as bad debt expense when all efforts to collect have been exhausted and recoveries are recognized when they are received. As of December 31, 20132014 and December 31, 2012,2013, our accounts receivable, net, balance was $14.9$17.9 million and $17.9$14.9 million, respectively, which was net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $410,000 and $869,000, and zero, respectively. During 2014, we decreased this allowance for doubtful accounts by $459,000 primarily for improved collections worldwide. During 2013 we increased our allowance for doubtful accounts by $869,000 primarily because of the poor financial condition of a few customers in China. During 2011, we decreased this allowance for doubtful accounts by $99,000 primarily for improved collections worldwide. No amounts have been written off. If actual uncollectible accounts differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated allowance for doubtful accounts would be required, which could have a material impact on our financial results for future periods.

The allowance for sales returns is also deducted from gross accounts receivable. During 2014, we utilized $410,000 and charged an additional $183,000 resulting in the allowance for sales returns of $413,000 as of December 31, 2014. During 2013, we utilized $189,000 and charged an additional $130,000 resulting in the allowance for sales returns of $186,000 as of December 31, 2013. During 2012, we utilized $426,000 and charged an additional $547,000 resulting in the allowance for sales returns of $245,000 as of December 31, 2012. During 2011, we utilized $144,000 and reduced allowance of $194,000 from the beginning balance of $462,000 resulting in the allowance for sales returns of $124,000 as of December 31, 2011.

Warranty Reserve

Warranty

We maintain a warranty reserve is based upon our claims experience during the prior twelve months. Warranty costs are accrued at the time revenue is recognized. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, accrued product warranties totaled $802,000 and $1.0 million, and $588,000, respectively. The increasedecrease in accrued product warranties is primarily attributable to increaseddecreased claims for quality issues experienced by some customers. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations for future periods.


Inventories


Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (approximated by standard cost) or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average cost method. Our inventory consists of raw materials as well as finished goods and work-in-process that include material, labor and manufacturing overhead costs. Given the nature of our substrate products, and the materials used in the manufacturing process, the wafers and ingots comprising work-in-process may be held in inventory for up to two years and three years, respectively, as the risk of obsolescence for these materials is low. We routinely evaluate the levels of our inventory in light of current market conditions in order to identify excess and obsolete inventory, and we provide a valuation allowance for certain inventories based upon the age and quality of the product and the projections for sale of the completed products.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation computed using the straight-line method over the estimated economic lives of the assets, which vary from 3 to 27.5 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the term of the lease. We generally depreciate computers, software, office equipment, furniture and fixtures over 3 years, automobiles over 5 years, leasehold and building improvements over 10 years, or lease term if shorter, and buildings over 27.5 years. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We evaluate the recoverability of property, equipment and intangible assets in accordance with ASC topic 360, Property, Plant and Equipment (“ASC 360”). When events and circumstance indicate that long-lived assets may be impaired, our management compares the carrying value of the long-lived assets to the projection of future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets. In the event that the carrying value exceeds the future undiscounted cash flows, we record an impairment charge against income equal to the excess of the carrying value over the asset’s fair value. Fair values are determined based on quoted market values, discounted cash flows or internal and external appraisals, as applicable. We did not recognize any impairment charges of long-lived assets in 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011.


2012.

Impairment of Investments

All available-for-sale securities are periodically reviewed for impairment. Investments are considered to be impaired when its fair value is less than its amortized cost basis and it is more likely than not that we will be required to sell the impaired security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the magnitude of the decline in market value, the length of time the market value has been below cost (or adjusted cost), credit quality, and our ability and intent to hold the securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

We also invest in equity instruments of privately-held companies for business and strategic purposes. These investments are classified as other assets and are accounted for under the equity or cost method as we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over their operations. We monitor our investments for impairment and record reductions in carrying value when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Determination of impairment is highly subjective and is based on a number of factors, including an assessment of the strength of investee’s management, the length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than our cost basis, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the investee, fundamental changes to the business prospects of the investee, share prices of subsequent offerings, and our intent and ability to hold the investment for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in our carrying value. We estimate fair value of our cost method investments considering available information such as pricing in recent rounds of financing, current cash positions, earnings and cash flow forecasts, recent operational performance and any other readily available market data.

Segment Reporting

We operate in one segment for the design, development, manufacture and distribution of high-performance compound semiconductor substrates and sale of materials. In accordance with ASC topic 280, Segment Reporting, our chief operating decision-maker has been identified as the chief executive officer,our Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing our performance.performance for the Company. While we obtain financial statements from all of our joint ventures in order to prepare our consolidated financial statements, we do not review them either individually or in the aggregate when making operating decisions for our business. We manage our Company on a consolidated basis with a review of revenue by product. We discuss revenue and capacity for both AXT and our joint ventures collectively, when determining capacity constraints and need for raw materials in our business, and consider their capacity when determining our strategic and product marketing and advertising strategies. While we consolidate our majority-owned joint ventures, we do not allocate resources to any of them, nor allocate any portion of overhead, interest and other income, interest expense or taxes to them. We therefore have determined that our joint venture operations do not constitute an operating segment.

Stock‑Based Since we operate in one segment, all financial segment and product line information can be found in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

We have employee stock option plans, which are described more fully in Note 11—Employee Benefit Plans and Stock-based Compensation. We account for stock‑basedstock-based compensation in accordance with the provisions of ASC topic 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the stock options granted. Stock‑basedStock-based compensation cost is measured at each grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense and as an increase in additional paid-in-capital over the requisite service period of the award. All of our stock compensation is accounted for as an equity instrument.

56

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Research and Development

Research and development costs consist primarily of salaries including stock-based compensation expense and related personnel costs, depreciation, materials and product testing and are expensed as incurred.

Advertising Costs

Advertising costs, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, are expensed as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 were $10,000, $12,000 and 2011 were $12,000, $19,000, and $16,000, respectively.

Shipping and Handling costs

We include fees billed to customers and costs incurred for shipping and handling as a component of cost of sales.

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes in accordance with ASC topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”) which requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be recognized using enacted tax rates for the effect of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of recorded assets and liabilities. ASC 740 also requires that deferred tax assets be reduced by a valuation allowance if it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. The impact of ASC 740 is more fully described in Note 13.

Comprehensive Income (loss)

We report comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with the provisions of ASC topic 220 Comprehensive Income (“ASC 220”) which establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income or loss and its components in the financial statements. The components of other comprehensive income consist of unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities and foreign currency translation adjustments. Comprehensive income is presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income (loss).

Net Income (loss)Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods less shares of common stock subject to repurchase and non-vested stock awards. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the periods. The dilutive effect of outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards is reflected in diluted earnings per share by application of the treasury stock method. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of common shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted stock awards.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2013,May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-02, Other Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). The amendments in this Update supersedeASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and replace the presentation requirements for reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive for all public and private organizations. The amendments requiresupersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. ASU 2014-09 requires an entity to provide additional information about reclassifications outrecognize revenue to depict the transfer of accumulated other comprehensive income. The amendmentspromised goods or services to customers in this Update arean amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for theannual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012.2016. The Company is in compliance with the amendments asimpact on our financial condition, results of December 31, 2013.

In July 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-11, Income Taxes (Topic 740). The amendments in this Update provide guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, similar tax loss, or tax credit carryforward exists. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statementsoperations and cash flows as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013. The Company will begin complying with this duringresult of the first quarteradoption of fiscal 2014 which will just alter our required presentation of these tax matters.ASU 2014-09 has not yet been determined.

57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 2. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Investments

Our cash, cash equivalents and investments are classified as follows (in thousands):

 
 December 31, 2013  December 31, 2012 
 
 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
  
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
  
Fair
Value
  
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
  
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
  
Fair
Value
 
Classified as: 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
Cash $24,852  $  $  $24,852  $26,250  $  $  $26,250 
Cash equivalents:                                
Money market fund  109         109   4,384         4,384 
Total cash and cash equivalents  24,961         24,961   30,634         30,634 
Investments(available for sale):                                
Certificates of Deposit  6,320   2   (4)  6,318   6,638   9   (2)  6,645 
Corporate bonds  14,276   8   (6)  14,278   12,872   7   (63)  12,816 
Corporate equity security  125   1,923      2,048             
Total investments  20,721   1,933   (10)  22,644   19,510   16   (65)  19,461 
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments $45,682  $1,933  $(10) $47,605  $50,144  $16  $(65) $50,095 
Contractual maturities on investments:                                
Due within 1 year $10,569          $12,499  $10,288          $10,270 
Due after 1 through 5 years  10,152           10,145   9,222           9,191 
 
 $20,721          $22,644  $19,510          $19,461 

December 31, 2014
December 31, 2013
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Gross
Unrealized
Gain
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair
Value
Classified as:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash
$
28,791
 
$
 
$
 
$
28,791
 
$
24,852
 
$
 
$
 
$
24,852
 
Cash equivalents:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market fund
 
23
 
 
 
 
 
 
23
 
 
109
 
 
 
 
 
 
109
 
Total cash and cash equivalents
 
28,814
 
 
 
 
 
 
28,814
 
 
24,961
 
 
 
 
 
 
24,961
 
Investments(available for sale):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certificates of
Deposit
 
10,195
 
 
1
 
 
(13
)
 
10,183
 
 
6,320
 
 
2
 
 
(4
)
 
6,318
 
Corporate bonds
 
9,214
 
 
1
 
 
(29
)
 
9,186
 
 
14,276
 
 
8
 
 
(6
)
 
14,278
 
Corporate equity security
 
44
 
 
710
 
 
 
 
754
 
 
125
 
 
1,923
 
 
 
 
2,048
 
Total investments
 
19,453
 
 
712
 
 
(42
)
 
20,123
 
 
20,721
 
 
1,933
 
 
(10
)
 
22,644
 
Total cash, cash equivalents and investments
$
48,267
 
$
712
 
$
(42
)
$
48,937
 
$
45,682
 
$
1,933
 
$
(10
)
$
47,605
 
Contractual maturities on investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Due within 1 year
$
11,631
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
12,340
 
$
10,569
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
12,499
 
Due after 1 through 5 years
 
7,822
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
7,783
 
 
10,152
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
10,145
 
$
19,453
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
20,123
 
$
20,721
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
22,644
 

We manage our investments as a single portfolio of highly marketable securities that is intended to be available to meet our current cash requirements. We have no investments in auction rate securities. Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $1.3 million. Gross realized gains from sales of available-for-sale investments for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $1.3 million. There were no sales of available-for-sales securities and no realized gains and losses for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we had $8,000 gross realized losses on sales of our available-for-sale securities.

Also included in short-term investments at December 31, 20132014 is our investment in common stock of Intelligent Epitaxy Technology, Inc (IntelliEPI), a Taiwan publicly-traded company. We began classifying this asset as an available-for- sale security upon its initial public offering (IPO) in 2013. Prior to the IPO in 2013, during the third and fourth quarter of 2013, we sold some of our stock in IntelliEPI and realized a gain of approximately $800,000. An unrealized gain of $1.6 million net of tax was recorded in 2013 for the write-up to market valuation. In 2014, we sold additional IntelliEpi stock and realized a gain of approximately $1.3 million. An unrealized gain of $710,000 net of tax remains as of December 31, 2014 for IntelliEpi stock still held. These securities are valued at fair market value at December 31, 2013.2014. There is no assurance that the Company will realize this value when the securities are sold in the future.

The gross unrealized losses related to our portfolio of available-for-sale securities were primarily due to changes in interest rates and market and credit conditions of the underlying securities. We have determined that the gross unrealized losses on some of our available-for-sale securities as of December 31, 20132014 are temporary in nature. We periodically review our investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that have indications of possible impairment. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include the magnitude of the decline in market value, the length of time the market value has been below cost (or adjusted cost), credit quality, and our ability and intent to hold the securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in market value.

58

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

In Loss Position
< 12 months
In Loss Position
> 12 months
Total In
Loss Position
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certificates of deposit
$
4,492
 
$
(13
)
$
 
$
 
$
4,492
 
$
(13
)
Corporate bonds
 
3,770
 
 
(27
)
 
4,309
 
 
(2
)
 
8,079
 
 
(29
)
Total in loss position
$
8,262
 
$
(40
)
$
4,309
 
$
(2
)
$
12,571
 
$
(42
)

The following table summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

In Loss Position
< 12 months
In Loss Position
> 12 months
Total In
Loss Position
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Certificates of deposit
$
3,425
 
$
(4
)
$
720
 
$
(0
)
$
4,145
 
$
(4
)
Corporate bonds
 
4,473
 
 
(5
)
 
3,711
 
 
(1
)
 
8,184
 
 
(6
)
Total in loss position
$
7,898
 
$
(9
)
$
4,431
 
$
(1
)
$
12,329
 
$
(10
)
The following table summarizes the fair value and gross unrealized losses related to available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
 
In Loss Position
< 12 months
In Loss Position
> 12 months
Total In
Loss Position
 
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Fair
Value
Gross
Unrealized
(Loss)
Investments:
Certificates of deposit $1,877  $(1) $199  $(1) $2,076  $(2)
Corporate bonds  6,446   (40)  1,502   (23)  7,948   (63)
Total in loss position $8,323  $(41) $1,701  $(24) $10,024  $(65)

Investments in Privately-held Companies

We have made strategic investments in private companies located in China in order to gain access at a competitive cost to raw materials that are critical to our substrate business (see Note 6). The investment balances for all theof these companies, including minority investments indirectly in privately-held companies made by our consolidated joint ventures, accounted for under the equity method are included in “other assets” in the consolidated balance sheets and totaled $10.9$12.1 million and $9.4$10.9 million as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

We also maintain minority investments in companies which are accounted for under the cost method as we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over their operations. We had two companies which are accounted for under the cost method in 2012 and one company in 2013. In 2013, one of the two investments was re-categorized as available for sale short-term investments and written-up to market value. Our investments under the cost method are reviewed for other than temporary declines in value on a quarterly basis. We monitor our investments for impairment and record reductions in carrying value when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, our investments in these unconsolidated companies had a carrying value of $200,000 and $392,000, respectively, and were also included in “other assets” in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value Measurements

ASC topic 820, Fair value measurement (“ASC 820”) establishes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 instrument valuations are obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involvingof the asset or identical assets. Level 2 instrument valuations are obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments. Level 3 instrument valuations are obtained from unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require us to develop our own assumptions. As of December 31, 2013,2014, we did not have any Level 3 assets or liabilities. On a recurring basis, we measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value, primarily consisting of our short-term and long-term investments.

The type of instrument valued based on quoted market prices in active markets include our money market funds, which are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Other than corporate equity securities which are based on quoted market prices and classified as Level 1, we classify our available-for-sale securities including certificates of deposit, corporate bonds as having Level 2 inputs. The valuation techniques used to measure the fair value of these financial instruments having Level 2 inputs were derived from quoted market prices, broker or dealer

59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. There were no changes in valuation techniques or related inputs in the year ended December 31, 2013. 2014. There have been no transfers between fair value measurement levels during the year ended December 31, 2013.


2014.

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with ASC 820 as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

Balance as of
December 31, 2014
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets of
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents and investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market fund
$
23
 
$
23
 
$
 
Corporate equity securities
 
754
 
 
754
 
 
 
Certificates of deposit
 
10,183
 
 
 
 
10,183
 
Corporate bonds
 
9,186
 
 
 
 
9,186
 
Total
$
         20,146
 
$
         777
 
$
         19,369
 
Liabilities
$
 
$
 
$
 
 
 
 

The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with ASC 820 as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

 
 
Balance as of
December 31, 2013
  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets of
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Assets: 
  
  
 
Cash equivalents and investments: 
  
  
 
Money market fund $109  $109  $ 
Certificates of deposit  6,318      6,318 
Corporate bonds  14,278      14,278 
Corporate equity securities  2,048   2,048    
Total $22,753  $2,157  $20,596 
Liabilities $  $  $ 
The following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in accordance with ASC 820 as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):
 
 
Balance as of
December 31, 2012
  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets of
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 
Assets: 
  
  
 
Cash equivalents and investments: 
  
  
 
Money market fund $4,384  $4,384  $ 
Certificates of deposit  6,645      6,645 
Corporate bonds  12,816      12,816 
Total $23,845  $4,384  $19,461 
Liabilities $  $  $ 

Balance as of
December 31, 2013
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets of
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents and investments:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Money market fund
$
109
 
$
109
 
$
 
Corporate equity securities
 
2,048
 
 
2,048
 
 
 
Certificates of deposit
 
6,318
 
 
 
 
6,318
 
Corporate bonds
 
14,278
 
 
 
 
14,278
 
Total
$
         22,753
 
$
         2,157
 
$
         20,596
 
Liabilities
$
 
$
 
$
 
 
 
 

Items Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets that are subject to nonrecurring fair value measurements are not included in the table above. These assets include investments in privately-held companies accounted for by equity and cost method (See Note 6). We did not record other-than-temporary impairment charges for either of these investments during 2013.


2014.

Note 3. Inventories

The components of inventory are summarized below (in thousands):

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2013  2012 
Inventories: 
  
 
Raw materials $21,063  $20,003 
Work in process  14,027   15,608 
Finished goods  4,037   4,741 
 
 $39,127  $40,352 

As of December 31,
2014
2013
Inventories:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Raw materials
$
18,990
 
$
21,063
 
Work in process
 
16,222
 
 
14,027
 
Finished goods
 
3,362
 
 
4,037
 
$
38,574
 
$
39,127
 

As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, carrying values of inventories were net of inventory reserve of $11.0$11.2 million and $10.1$11.0 million, respectively, for excess and obsolete inventory.


Note 4. Related Party Transactions

In August 2011, our consolidated joint venture, Beijing JiYa Semiconductor Material Co., LtdLtd. (JiYa), entered into a non-interest bearing note agreement in the amount of $1.7 million (Rmb 10,485,200) with one of its equity investment entities. Under the loan agreement, JiYa loaned $811,000 (Rmb 4,959,000) to its equity investment entity in August 2011 and the remaining amount of $904,000 (Rmb 5,526,200) was loaned during the three months ended March 31, 2012. The original term of the loan iswas for two years and ten months and the loan is payable to JiYa in three installments with the first installment of $429,000 (Rmb 2,620,000) due in December 2012, the second installment of $857,000 (Rmb 5,240,000) due in December 2013, and the last installment of $429,000 (Rmb 2,625,200) due in May 2014. In December, 2012 and June 2013, the parties signed two addendums3 periodic principal payments required. After

60

TABLE OF CONTENTS

various amendments to the terms of the note, agreement to delay the first repayment of $429,000 (Rmb 2,620,000) to June 2013 and June 2014, respectively. Inin December 2013 the parties agreed to delay all three repayments toprincipal repayment until December 2016. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, we included $1.7 million (Rmb 10,485,200) in “Related party notes receivable – long term” in our consolidated balance sheets. As of December 31, 2012, we included $1.2 million (Rmb 7,860,000) in “Related party notes receivable – short term” and $416,000 (Rmb 2,625,200) in “related party notes receivable – long term” in the consolidated balance sheets.

In August 2011, our consolidated joint venture, Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd. (Jin Mei) loaned $818,000 (Rmb 5,000,000) to its equity investment entity for construction purposes. During the three months ended December 31, 2012, the parties signed a note agreement retroactively to set forth the terms for the loan. The loan bears interest at 6.7% per annum, subject to adjustment to market rate, and the principal is due on December 31, 2013. Interest income of $54,000 (RMB 333,000) and $76,000 (Rmb 478,000), including retroactive interest income of $23,000 (Rmb 144,000) for 2011,  were included in “other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. In December 2013, the repayment of the principal $818,000 (RMB 5,000,000) was received by our consolidated joint venture. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we included $0 and $792,000 (RMB 5,000,000)  in “related party notes receivable – short term” in our consolidated balance sheets.

Beginning in 2012, JiYa is contractually obligated under an agency sales agreement to sell raw material on behalf of one of its equity investment entities. JiyaJiYa bills to the customers and remits the receipts, net of its portions of sales commission, to this equity investment entity. For the year ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, JiYa has recorded $0 and $23,000 and $70,000of income from agency sales respectively, which was included in “other income (expense),expense, net” in theour condensed consolidated statements of operations. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and 2012,there were no amounts payable of $0 and $257,000, respectively, to this equity investment entity for delivery in transit were included in “accrued liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets.

entity.

JiYa also purchases raw materials from one of its equity investment entities for production in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, amounts payable of $1.8 million and 2012, payables of $1.5 million, and $1.1 millionrespectively, were included in “accounts payable” in theour condensed consolidated balance sheets.


Beginning in 2012, our consolidated joint venture, Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd. (Jin Mei), is contractually obligated under an agency sales agreement to sell raw material on behalf of its equity investment entity. Jin Mei bills to the customers and remits the receipts, net of its portions of sales commission, to this equity investment entity. For the year ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, Jin Mei has recorded $128,000$20,000 and $144,000$128,000 income from agency sales, respectively, which were included in “other income (expense), net” in the consolidated statements of operations.


In March 2012, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co., Ltd. (Tongmei), entered into an operating lease for the land it owns with our consolidated joint venture Beijing BoYu Semiconductor Vessel Craftwork Technology Co., Ltd. The lease agreement for the land withof approximately 22,081 square feet commenced on January 1, 2012 for a term of 10 years with annual lease payments of $24,000 (Rmb 150,000) subject to a 5% increase at each third year anniversary. The annual lease payment is due by January 31 of each year.


Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing

Tongmei Xtal Technology Co, Ltd., has paid $121,000 (Rmb 740,924)$120,000 on behalf of Donghai County Dongfang High Purity Electronic Materials Co., Ltd., its equity investment entity, to purchase materials. In 2014, an agreement was signed between Tongmei and Dongfang to set the date of repayment on December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2013,2014, this balance was included in "prepaid expenses and other current assets"“Related party notes receivable – short term” in our consolidated balance sheets.

In April 2014, Tongmei loaned an additional of $49,000 to Dongfang. The loan bears interest at 6.15% per annum and the principal and interest totaling $171,000 as of December 31, 2014 is due on December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, this balance, including both principal and interest, was included in “Related party notes receivable – short term” in our consolidated balance sheets.

Tongmei also purchases raw materials from one of our equity investment entities for production in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, amounts payable of $513,000 and $0, respectively, were included in “accounts payable” in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Our Related Party Transactions Policy seeks to prohibit all conflicts of interest in transactions between related parties and us, unless they have been approved by our Board of Directors. This policy applies to all of our employees and directors, our subsidiaries and our joint ventures. Our executive officers retain board seats on the Board of Directors of the companies in which we have invested in our China joint ventures. See Note 6 for further details.


61

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 5. Property, Plant and Equipment, Net


The components of our property, plant and equipment are summarized below (in thousands):

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2013  2012 
Property, plant and equipment: 
  
 
Building $30,369  $28,089 
Machinery and equipment  40,764   37,334 
Leasehold improvements  4,493   3,578 
Construction in progress  2,879   3,946 
 
  78,505   72,947 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization  (40,884)  (35,712)
 
 $37,621  $37,235 

As of December 31,
2014
2013
Property, plant and equipment:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Building
$
30,469
 
$
30,369
 
Machinery and equipment
 
41,900
 
 
40,764
 
Leasehold improvements
 
5,070
 
 
4,493
 
Construction in progress
 
1,918
 
 
2,879
 
 
79,357
 
 
78,505
 
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
 
(45,495
)
 
(40,884
)
$
33,862
 
$
37,621
 

Depreciation and amortization expense was $5.6 million, $5.5 million $3.9 million, and $3.4$3.9 million for the years ended 2014, 2013, and 2012 and 2011, respectively.


Note 6. Investments in Privately-held Companies

We have made strategic investments in private companies located in China in order to gain access to raw materials at a competitive cost that are critical to our substrate business.

Our investments are summarized below (in thousands):

 
 Investment Balance as of 
 
 
 
 
 December 31,  December 31, Accounting Ownership 
Company 2013  2012 Method Percentage 
Beijing JiYa Semiconductor Material Co., Ltd $3,331  $3,331 Consolidated  46%
Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd  592   592 Consolidated  83%
Beijing BoYu Semiconductor Vessel Craftwork Technology Co., Ltd  1,346   410 Consolidated  70%
 
 $5,269  $4,333 
 
    
              
Donghai County Dongfang High Purity Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. $1,900  $2,038 Equity  46%
Xilingol Tongli Germanium Co. Ltd  4,692   4,246 Equity  25%
Emeishan Jia Mei High Purity Metals Co., Ltd  945   1,042 Equity  25%
 
 $7,537  $7,326 
 
    

Investment Balance as of
Company
December 31,
2014
December 31,
2013
Accounting
Method
Ownership
Percentage
Beijing JiYa Semiconductor Material Co., Ltd
$
         3,331
 
$
         3,331
 
Consolidated46%
Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd
 
592
 
 
592
 
Consolidated83%
Beijing BoYu Semiconductor Vessel Craftwork Technology Co., Ltd
 
1,346
 
 
1,346
 
Consolidated70%
$
5,269
 
$
5,269
 
Donghai County Dongfang High Purity Electronic Materials Co., Ltd.
$
1,723
 
$
1,900
 
Equity46%
Xilingol Tongli Germanium Co. Ltd
 
5,351
 
 
4,692
 
Equity25%
Emeishan Jia Mei High Purity Metals Co., Ltd
 
1,021
 
 
945
 
Equity25%
$
8,095
 
$
7,537
 

Our ownership of Beijing JiYa Semiconductor Material Co., Ltd. (JiYa) is 46%. We continue to consolidate JiYa as we have significant influence in management and have majority control of the board. Our Chief Executive Officer is chairman of the JiYa board whileand two other of our president of China operations and our vice president of China administration and our vice president of wafer productionemployees are also members of the board.


Our ownership of Nanjing Jin Mei Gallium Co., Ltd. (Jin Mei) is 83%. We continue to consolidate Jin Mei as we have significant influence in management and have majority control of the board. Our Chief Executive Officer is chairman of the Jin Mei board whileand two other of our president of China operations and our vice president of China administrationemployees are also members of the board.


Our ownership of Beijing BoYu Semiconductor Vessel Craftwork Technology Co., Ltd (BoYu) is 70%. We continue to consolidate BoYu as we have a significant influence in management and have majority control of the board. Our Chief Executive Officer is chairman of the BoYu board whileand two other of our president of China operations and our vice president of China administrationemployees are also members of the board.


Although we have representation on the boards of directors of each of these companies, the daily operations of each of these companies are managed by local management and not by us. Decisions concerning their respective short term strategy and operations, any capacity expansion and annual capital expenditures, and decisions concerning sales of finished product, are made by local management with some inputs from us.


62

TABLE OF CONTENTS

During 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, the three consolidated joint ventures generated $3.0 million, $3.5 million $7.4 million and $12.5$7.4 million of income, respectively, of which $691,000, $1.1 million $3.0 million and $5.5$3.0 million, respectively was allocated to minority interests, resulting in $2.3 million, $2.4 million $4.4 million and $7.0$4.4 million, respectively to our net income.

For the three equity investment entities that are not consolidated, the investment balances are included in “other assets” in our consolidated balance sheets and totaled $7.5$8.1 million and $7.3$7.5 million as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively. We own 46% of the ownership interests in one of these companies and 25% in each of the other two companies. These three companies are not considered variable interest entities because:

all three companies have sustainable businesses of their own;

our voting power is proportionate to our ownership interests;
·all three companies have sustainable businesses of their own;
we only recognize our respective share of the losses and/or residual returns generated by the companies if they occur; and

·our voting power is proportionate to our ownership interests;

·we only recognize our respective share of the losses and/or residual returns generated by the companies if they occur; and

·we do not have controlling financial interest in, do not maintain operational or management control of, do not control the board of directors of, and are not required to provide additional investment or financial support to any of these companies.

64

Table of, Contentsdo not control the board of directors of, and are not required to provide additional investment or financial support to any of these companies.

These three equity investment entities had grossgenerated for AXT equity earnings of $569,000, $270,000 $379,000 and $520,000$379,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, 2012 and 20112012, respectively, and was recorded as “equity in earnings of unconsolidated joint ventures” in the consolidated statements of operations.

Net income recorded from all of the consolidated joint ventures and these equity investment entities was $2.9 million, $2.6 million $4.7 million and $7.6$4.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively.

We also maintain minority investments indirectly in privately-held companies by our consolidated joint ventures. These minority investments are accounted for under the equity method in the books of our consolidated joint ventures. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, our consolidated joint ventures included these minority investments in “other assets” in the consolidated balance sheets with a carrying value of $4.0 million and $3.4 million, and $2.0 million, respectively.


All the minority investment entities that are not consolidated and accounted for under the equity method had the following summarized operating information (in thousands) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively.

 
 
Years Ended
December 31,
  
Our share for the
Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2013  2012  2011  2013  2012  2011 
Net Revenue $41,257  $32,858  $21,340  $10,240  $8,091  $5,196 
Gross profit  13,836   11,057   7,576   3,328   2,643   1,814 
Operating income  8,174   6,310   3,819   1,820   1,409   863 
Net income  6,315   5,665   2,900   1,377   1,281   741 

Years Ended
December 31,
Our share for the
Years Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
2012
2014
2013
2012
Net Revenue
$
47,824
 
$
41,257
 
$
32,858
 
$
11,887
 
$
10,240
 
$
8,091
 
Gross profit
 
21,436
 
 
13,836
 
 
11,057
 
 
5,340
 
 
3,328
 
 
2,643
 
Operating income
 
9,046
 
 
8,174
 
 
6,310
 
 
2,059
 
 
1,820
 
 
1,409
 
Net income
 
6,765
 
 
6,315
 
 
5,665
 
 
1,528
 
 
1,377
 
 
1,281
 

All the minority investment entities that are not consolidated and accounted for under the equity method had the following summarized balance sheet information (in thousands) as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively.

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2013  2012 
Current assets $22,139  $20,594 
Noncurrent assets  38,941   37,555 
Current liabilities  15,289   20,772 
Noncurrent liabilities  2,296   2,873 

As of December 31,
2014
2013
Current assets
$
31,482
 
$
22,139
 
Noncurrent assets
 
39,275
 
 
38,941
 
Current liabilities
 
19,923
 
 
15,289
 
Noncurrent liabilities
 
169
 
 
2,296
 

All the minority investment entities that are not consolidated and accounted for under the equity method had grossgenerated for AXT equity earnings of $1.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.3 million and $741,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. Dividends received from these minority investment entities were $325,000, $396,000 277,000 and $357,000$277,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. Undistributed retained earnings relating to our investments in all these minority investment entities were $5.3$6.5 million and $4.3$5.3 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively.

63

65

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 7. Other Investments


As of December 31, 2013,2014, we maintain minority investments in one privately-held company accounted for under the cost method as we do not have the ability to exercise significant influence over its operations. Our investments in this privately-held company is reviewed for other than temporary declines in value on a quarterly basis. We monitor our investments for impairment and record reductions in carrying value when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Reasons for other than temporary declines in value include whether the related company would have insufficient cash flow to operate for the next twelve months, significant changes in the operating performance and changes in market conditions. We had two companiesone company which areis accounted for under the cost method in 20122014 and one company in 2013. In 2013, one of the two investments was re-categorized as available for sale short-term investments and written-up to market value after its initial public offering. As of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, our cost method investments had a carrying value of $200,000, and 392,000, respectively, and are included in “other assets” in the consolidated balance sheets.

Note 8. Accrued Liabilities

The components of accrued liabilities are summarized below (in thousands):

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2013  2012 
Accrued compensation and related charges $1,762  $2,066 
Accrued product warranty  1,048   588 
Current portion of royalty payments  800   800 
Accrued professional services  543   609 
Dividends payable by consolidated joint ventures  649    
Accrued income taxes  125   640 
Other accrued liabilities  2,359   2,499 
 
 $7,286  $7,202 

As of December 31,
2014
2013
Accrued compensation and related charges
$
2,656
 
$
1,762
 
Accrued product warranty
 
802
 
 
1,048
 
Current portion of royalty payments
 
800
 
 
800
 
Accrued professional services
 
509
 
 
543
 
Dividends payable by consolidated joint ventures
 
563
 
 
649
 
Accrued income taxes
 
119
 
 
125
 
Other accrued liabilities
 
2,185
 
 
2,359
 
$
7,634
 
$
7,286
 

Note 9. Debt

We have an unused credit facility with a bank that provides for a line of credit of $10.0 million as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, respectively, which is secured by marketable securities we have with the bank and shown as short-term and long-term investments of $18.6$15.1 million on our consolidated balance sheets. The annual interest rate is 1.65% over the current 30-day LIBOR (London InterBankInterbank Offered Rate). The annual interest rate was approximately 1.9% as of December 31, 2013.2014. There were no outstanding borrowings under this line of credit as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012.

2013.

Note 10. Stockholders’ Equity and Stock Repurchase Program

Stockholders’ Equity


The 883,000 shares of $0.001 par value Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, valued at $3,532,000 are non-voting and non-convertible preferred stock with a 5.0% cumulative annual dividend rate payable when declared by the board of directors and $4 per share liquidation preference over common stock, and must be paid before any distribution is made to common stockholders. These preferred shares were issued to Lyte Optronics, Inc. stockholders in connection with the completion of our acquisition of Lyte Optronics, Inc. on May 28, 1999.

There were no reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 20132014 and 2012.

2013.

Stock Repurchase Program


On February 21, 2013, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up to $6.0 million of our outstanding common stock through February 27, 2014. These purchases can be made from time to time in the open market and are funded from our existing cash balances and cash generated from operations. During 2013, we repurchased approximately 285,000 shares at an average price of $2.51 per share for a total purchase price of $716,000 under the stock repurchase program.


As of December 31, 2013, approximately $5.3 million remained available for future repurchases under this program. No shares were repurchased in 2014 under this program and the plan expired on February 27, 2014.

64

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On October 27, 2014, our Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program pursuant to which we may repurchase up to $5.0 million of our outstanding common stock. These purchases can be made from time to time in the open market and are funded from our existing cash balances and cash generated from operations. See Item 5, Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities in Part II.

Note 11. Employee Benefit Plans and Stock-based Compensation

Stock Option Plans and Equity Incentive Plans

In July 1997, our board of directors approved the 1997 Stock Option Plan (“1997 Plan”), which provides for the grant of incentive and non-qualified stock options to our employees, consultants and directors. Under the 1997 Plan, 5,423,583 shares of common stock have been authorized for issuance. Options granted under the 1997 Plan are generally for periods not to exceed ten years (five years if the option is granted to a 10% stockholder) and are granted at the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant as determined by the board of directors. Options granted under the 1997 Plan generally vest 25% at the end of one year and 2.1% each month thereafter, with full vesting after four years.

In May 2007, our shareholders approved our 2007 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan is a restatement of the 1997 Plan which expired in 2007. The 1,928,994 share reserve of the 1997 Plan became the reserve of the 2007 Plan, together with 1,300,000 additional shares approved for issuance under the 2007 Plan. In May 2013, the shareholders approved an additional 2,000,000 shares to be issued under the 2007 plan. Awards may be made under the 2007 Plan are stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units, deferred compensation awards and other stock‑basedstock-based awards. Stock options and stock appreciation rights awarded under the 2007 Plan may not be repriced without stockholder approval. Stock options and stock appreciation rights may not be granted below fair market value. Stock options or stock appreciation rights generally shall not be fully vested over a period of less than three years from the date of grant and cannot be exercised more than 10 years from the date of grant. Restricted stock, restricted stock units, and performance awards generally shall not vest faster than over a three-year period (or a twelve‑monthtwelve-month period if vesting is based on a performance measure). In December 2008, the 2007 Plan was amended to comply with the applicable requirements under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. As of December 31, 2013,2014, approximately 1,786,0001,003,000 shares were available for grant under the 2007 Plan.

65

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Stock Options

The following summarizes our stock option activity under the 2007 Plan, and the related weighted average exercise price within each category for each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 20132014 (in thousands, except per share data):

Stock Options
 
Number of
Options
Outstanding
  
Weighted‑
average
Exercise
Price
  
Weighted‑
average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
  
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 
 
 
  
  (in years)  
 
Balance as of January 1, 2011  2,280  $3.10   6.40  $17,030 
Granted  367   4.79         
Exercised  (251)  2.54         
Canceled and expired  (16)  27.98         
Balance as of December 31, 2011  2,380   3.25   6.25  $3,456 
Granted  592   3.32         
Exercised  (136)  2.17         
Canceled and expired  (109)  4.25         
Balance as of December 31, 2012  2,727   3.28   6.71  $1,353 
Granted  488   2.38         
Exercised  (331)  1.62         
Canceled and expired  (213)  3.60         
Balance as of December 31, 2013  2,671  $3.29   6.71  $893 
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2013  2,649  $3.30   6.68  $889 
Options exercisable as of December 31, 2013  1,666  $3.34   5.33  $786 

Stock Options
Number of
Options
Outstanding
Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price
Weighted-
average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in years)
Balance as of January 1, 2012
 
2,380
 
$
3.25
 
 
6.25
 
$
3,456
 
Granted
 
592
 
 
3.32
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercised
 
(136
)
 
2.17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Canceled and expired
 
(109
)
 
4.25
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2012
 
2,727
 
 
3.28
 
 
6.71
 
$
1,353
 
Granted
 
488
 
 
2.38
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercised
 
(331
)
 
1.62
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Canceled and expired
 
(213
)
 
3.60
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2013
 
2,671
 
$
3.29
 
 
6.71
 
$
893
 
Granted
 
712
 
 
2.40
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercised
 
(111
)
 
1.21
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Canceled and expired
 
(74
)
 
5.18
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Balance as of December 31, 2014
 
      3,198
 
$
3.12
 
 
6.95
 
$
1,247
 
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2014
 
3,198
 
$
3.12
 
 
6.95
 
$
1,247
 
Options exercisable as of December 31, 2014
 
1,859
 
$
3.46
 
 
5.48
 
$
821
 

The options outstanding and exercisable as of December 31, 20132014 were in the following exercise price ranges (in thousands, except per share data):

 
 
Options Outstanding as of
December 31, 2013
  
Options Vested and
Exercisable as of
December 31, 2013
 
Range of
Exercise Price
 Shares  
Weighted‑average
Exercise Price
  
Weighted‑average
Remaining
Contractual Life
  Shares  
Weighted‑Average
Exercise Price
 
$1.18 ‑ $1.34  216  $1.26   1.17   216  $1.26 
$1.59 ‑ $1.59  296  $1.59   5.34   296  $1.59 
$1.91 ‑ $1.91  4  $1.91   1.87   4  $1.91 
$2.04 ‑ $2.04  333  $2.04   5.82   333  $2.04 
$2.36 ‑ $2.36  428  $2.36   9.84   0  $0.00 
$2.91 ‑ $2.91  444  $2.91   8.85   120  $2.91 
$3.14 ‑ $4.09  42  $3.66   5.06   28  $3.53 
$4.79 ‑ $4.79  341  $4.79   7.59   189  $4.79 
$4.81 ‑ $5.61  142  $5.27   5.69   97  $5.11 
$5.83 ‑ $7.82  425  $5.96   5.61   383  $5.96 
 
  2,671  $3.29   6.71   1,666  $3.34 

Options Outstanding as of
December 31, 2014
Options Vested and
Exercisable as of
December 31, 2014
Range of
Exercise Price
Shares
Weighted-average
Exercise Price
Weighted-average
Remaining
Contractual Life
Shares
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
$1.33 - $1.59
 
401
 
$
1.52
 
 
3.33
 
 
401
 
$
1.52
 
$1.91 - $1.91
 
4
 
$
1.91
 
 
0.87
 
 
4
 
$
1.91
 
$2.04 - $2.04
 
333
 
$
2.04
 
 
4.82
 
 
333
 
$
2.04
 
$2.14 - $2.29
 
252
 
$
2.26
 
 
9.40
 
 
0
 
$
0.00
 
$2.36 - $2.36
 
428
 
$
2.36
 
 
8.84
 
 
116
 
$
2.36
 
$2.47 - $2.47
 
460
 
$
2.47
 
 
9.84
 
 
0
 
$
0.00
 
$2.91 - $2.91
 
444
 
$
2.91
 
 
7.85
 
 
231
 
$
2.91
 
$3.18 - $4.09
 
29
 
$
3.85
 
 
6.31
 
 
20
 
$
3.84
 
$4.79 - $4.79
 
330
 
$
4.79
 
 
6.82
 
 
262
 
$
4.79
 
$4.81 - $7.82
 
517
 
$
5.79
 
 
5.17
 
 
492
 
$
5.80
 
 
3,198
 
$
3.12
 
 
6.95
 
 
1,859
 
$
3.46
 

There were 111,000, 331,000 136,000 and 251,000136,000 options exercised in the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. The total intrinsic value of options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $105,000, $331,000 and 2011 was $331,000, $392,000, and $1.6 million, respectively.

66

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As of December 31, 2013,2014, the total unamortized stock-based compensation cost related to unvested stock options granted to employees under our stock option plans was approximately $1.5$1.6 million, net of estimated forfeitures of $88,000.$57,000. This cost is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a weighted‑averageweighted-average period of approximately 2.72.8 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures. We did not capitalize any stock‑basedstock-based compensation to inventory as of December 31, 20132014 and 2012,2013, as the amounts are not significant.

Restricted Stock Awards

A summary of activity related to restricted stock awards for the years ended December 31, 2011,2014, 2013 and 2012 and 2013 is presented below:

Stock Awards
 Shares  
Weighted‑Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 
Non-vested as of January 1, 2011  218,405  $3.30 
Granted  97,986  $5.21 
Vested  (93,264) $2.51 
Non-vested as of December 31, 2011  223,127  $4.47 
Granted  113,768  $3.18 
Vested  (98,172) $3.42 
Non-vested as of December 31, 2012  238,723  $4.27 
Granted  103,636  $2.52 
Vested  (85,127) $4.56 
Forfeited  (16,000) $4.03 
Non-vested as of December 31, 2013  241,232  $3.44 

Stock Awards
Shares
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Non-vested as of January 1, 2012
 
223,127
 
$
4.47
 
Granted
 
113,768
 
$
3.18
 
Vested
 
(98,172
)
$
3.42
 
Non-vested as of December 31, 2012
 
238,723
 
$
4.27
 
Granted
 
103,636
 
$
2.52
 
Vested
 
(85,127
)
$
4.56
 
Forfeited
 
(16,000
)
$
4.03
 
Non-vested as of December 31, 2013
 
241,232
 
$
3.44
 
Granted
 
121,044
 
$
2.34
 
Vested
 
(100,779
)
$
4.01
 
Non-vested as of December 31, 2014
 
261,497
 
$
2.71
 

Total grant date fair value of stock awards vested during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $405,000, $389,000 and 2011 was $389,000, $336,000, and $234,000, respectively. As of December 31, 2013,2014, we had $681,000$596,000 of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards, which will be recognized over the weighted average period of 2.5 years.

Common Stock

The following number of shares of common stock were reserved and available for future issuance at December 31, 2013:

2014:

Options outstanding
3,197,840
2,670,528
Restricted stock awards outstanding
261,497
241,232
Stock available for future grant: 2007 Equity Incentive Plan
1,002,898
   1,785,504
Total
4,462,235
4,697,264


67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stock-based Compensation


We recorded $1.1 million, $1.3 million and $1.2 million and $896,000 of stock‑basedstock-based compensation in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. The following table summarizes compensation costs related to our stock‑basedstock-based compensation awards (in thousands, except per share data):

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
Stock‑based compensation in the form of employee stock options and restricted stock, included in: 
  
  
 
Cost of revenue $22  $78  $84 
Selling, general and administrative  1,091   1,000   766 
Research and development  164   137   46 
Total stock‑based compensation  1,277   1,215   896 
Tax effect on stock‑based compensation         
Net effect on net income $1,277  $1,215  $896 
Shares used in computing basic net income per share  32,700   32,144   31,872 
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share  32,700   32,865   33,061 
Effect on basic net income per share $(0.04) $(0.04) $(0.03)
Effect on diluted net income per share $(0.04) $(0.04) $(0.03)

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Stock-based compensation in the form of employee stock options and restricted stock, included in:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cost of revenue
$
18
 
$
22
 
$
78
 
Selling, general and administrative
 
938
 
 
1,091
 
 
1,000
 
Research and development
 
173
 
 
164
 
 
137
 
Total stock-based compensation
 
1,129
 
 
1,277
 
 
1,215
 
Tax effect on stock-based compensation
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net effect on net income
$
1,129
 
$
1,277
 
$
1,215
 
Shares used in computing basic net income per share
 
32,452
 
 
32,700
 
 
32,144
 
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share
 
32,452
 
 
32,700
 
 
32,865
 
Effect on basic net income per share
$
(0.03
)
$
(0.04
)
$
(0.04
)
Effect on diluted net income per share
$
(0.03
)
$
(0.04
)
$
(0.04
)

We estimate the fair value of stock options using a Black‑ScholesBlack-Scholes valuation model. There were 712,000, 488,000 592,000 and 367,000592,000 stock options granted with weighted‑averageweighted-average grant date fair value of $1.17, $1.09 $1.79 and $2.65$1.79 per share during 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. The fair value of options granted was estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted‑averageweighted-average assumptions:

 
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
Expected term (in years)  4.0   4.0   4.0 
Volatility  59.20%  72.87%  69.84%
Expected dividend  0%  0%  0%
Risk-free interest rate  0.98%  0.57%  1.00%

Years Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Expected term (in years)
 
4.1
 
 
4.0
 
 
4.0
 
Volatility
 
63.20
%
 
59.20
%
 
72.87
%
Expected dividend
 
0
%
 
0
%
 
0
%
Risk-free interest rate
 
1.85
%
 
0.98
%
 
0.57
%

The expected term for stock options is based on the observed historical option exercise behavior and post-vesting forfeitures of options by our employees, and the contractual term, the vesting period and the expected term of the outstanding options. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our Company’s common stock. The dividend yield of zero is based on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay cash dividends. The risk-free interest rates are taken from the Daily Federal Yield Curve Rates as of the grant dates as published by the Federal Reserve and represent the yields on actively traded Treasury securities for terms equal to the expected term of the options.


Retirement Savings Plan

We have a 401(k) Savings Plan (“Savings Plan”) which qualifies as a thrift plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. All full-time U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the Savings Plan after 90 days from the date of hire. Employees may elect to reduce their current compensation by up to the statutory prescribed annual limit and have the amount of such reduction contributed to the 401(k) Plan. We provide matching to employee contributions up to 4% of the employees’ base pay if employees contribute at least 6% of their base pay. If the contribution rate is less than 6% of the base pay, the matching percentage is prorated. Our contributions to to the 401(k) retirement savings plans were $115,000, $110,000 $900,000, and $610,000$900,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and 2011, respectively.

68

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 12. Guarantees

Indemnification Agreements

We enter into standard indemnification arrangements with our customers in the ordinary course of business. Pursuant to these arrangements, we indemnify, hold harmless, and agree to reimburse the indemnified parties for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, generally their business partners or customers, in connection with any U.S. patent, or any copyright or other intellectual property infringement claim by any third party with respect to our products. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual anytime after the execution of the agreement. The maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these agreements is unlimited. We have never incurred costs to defend lawsuits or settle claims related to these indemnification agreements. As a result, we believe the estimated fair value of these agreements is minimal.

We have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers that require us to indemnify our directors and officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as directors or officers, other than liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable nature; to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified; and to obtain directors’ and officers’ insurance if available on reasonable terms, which we currently have in place.


Product Warranty

We provide warranties for our products for a specific period of time, generally twelve months, against material defects. We provide for the estimated future costs of warranty obligations in cost of sales when the related revenue is recognized. The accrued warranty costs represent the best estimate at the time of sale of the total costs that we expect to incur to repair or replace product parts that fail while still under warranty. The amount of accrued estimated warranty costs are primarily based on historical experience as to product failures as well as current information on repair costs. On a quarterly basis, we review the accrued balances and update the historical warranty cost trends. The following table reflects the change in our warranty accrual which is included in “accrued liabilities” on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, during 20132014 and 20122013 (in thousands):

 
 
Years Ended
December 31,
 
 
 2013  2012 
Beginning accrued warranty and related costs $588  $1,003 
Accruals for warranties issued during the year  789   362 
Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties including expirations and changes in estimates  412   (450)
Cost of warranty repair  (741)  (327)
Ending accrued warranty and related costs $1,048  $588 

Years Ended
December 31,
2014
2013
Beginning accrued warranty and related costs
$
1,048
 
$
588
 
Accruals for warranties issued during the year
 
865
 
 
789
 
Adjustments related to pre-existing warranties including expirations and changes in estimates
 
(467
)
 
412
 
Cost of warranty repair
 
(644
)
 
(741
)
Ending accrued warranty and related costs
$
802
 
$
1,048
 

Note 13. Income Taxes

Consolidated income before provision for income taxes includes non-U.S. income of approximately $12.8 million, $16.7 million $16.3 million and $22.0$16.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. We recorded a current tax provision of $215,000, $188,000 $853,000, and $2.8 million$853,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are summarized below (in thousands):

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Current:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
$
 
$
 
$
 
State
 
2
 
 
13
 
 
(113
)
Foreign
 
213
 
 
175
 
 
966
 
Total current
 
215
 
 
188
 
 
853
 
Deferred:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Federal
 
 
 
 
 
 
State
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total deferred
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total net provision for income taxes
$
215
 
$
188
 
$
853
 

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
Current: 
  
  
 
Federal $  $  $ 
State  13   (113)  259 
Foreign  175   966   2,536 
Total current  188   853   2,795 
Deferred:            
Federal         
State         
Total deferred         
Total net provision for income taxes $188  $853  $2,795 

69

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A reconciliation of the effective income tax rates and the U.S. statutory federal income tax rate is summarized below:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
Statutory federal income tax rate  35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefits  (0.1)  (1.0)  0.6 
Change in valuation allowance  (111.8)  23.3   (11.5)
Stock compensation  (1.4)  1.5   0.3 
Foreign rate differences  85.3   (72.5)  (17.1)
Dividend from PRC investee  (19.6)  30.1   3.2 
Net loss from privately-held PRC investments  2.5   (2.6)  (0.7)
Other  7.3   (1.6)   
Effective tax rate  (2.8%)  12.2%  9.8%

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Statutory federal income tax rate
 
35.0
%
 
35.0
%
 
35.0
%
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefits
 
(0.2
)
 
(0.1
)
 
(1.0
)
Change in valuation allowance
 
(695.8
)
 
(111.8
)
 
23.3
 
Stock compensation
 
(26.3
)
 
(1.4
)
 
1.5
 
Foreign rate differences
 
758.6
 
 
85.3
 
 
(72.5
)
Dividend from PRC investee
 
(169.8
)
 
(19.6
)
 
30.1
 
Net loss from privately-held PRC investments
 
45.6
 
 
2.5
 
 
(2.6
)
Other
 
14.4
 
 
7.3
 
 
(1.6
)
Effective tax rate
 
(38.5
%)
 
(2.8
%)
 
12.2
%

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are summarized below (in thousands):

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2013  2012 
Deferred tax assets: 
  
 
Net operating loss $51,818  $44,155 
Accruals and reserves not yet deductible  4,985   5,389 
Credits  1,488   1,488 
 
  58,291   51,032 
Deferred tax liabilities:        
Valuation of investment portfolio  (288)   
 
  (288)   
Net deferred tax assets  58,003   51,032 
Valuation allowance  (58,003)  (51,032)
Net deferred tax assets $  $ 

As of December 31,
2014
2013
Deferred tax assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net operating loss
$
55,654
 
$
51,818
 
Accruals and reserves not yet deductible
 
4,517
 
 
4,985
 
Credits
 
1,488
 
 
1,488
 
 
61,659
 
 
58,291
 
Deferred tax liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
Valuation of investment portfolio
 
 
 
(288
)
 
 
 
(288
)
Net deferred tax assets
 
61,659
 
 
58,003
 
Valuation allowance
 
(61,659
)
 
(58,003
)
Net deferred tax assets
$
 
$
 

As of December 31, 2013,2014, we have federal and state net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $153.9$165.7 million and $43.5$5.6 million, respectively, which will expire beginning in 2022 and 2017, respectively. In addition, we have federal tax credit carryforwards of approximately $1.5 million, which will be expired beginning in 2019.

The deferred tax assets valuation allowance as of December 31, 20132014 is attributed to U.S. federal, and state deferred tax assets, which result primarily from future deductible accruals, reserves, net operating loss carryforwards, and tax credit carryforwards. We believe that, based on a number of factors, the available objective evidence creates sufficient uncertainty regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets such that a full valuation allowance has been recorded. These factors include our history of losses related to domestic operations, and the lack of carryback capacity to realize deferred tax assets. The valuation allowance increased by $7.0$4.0 million and increased by $1.5$7.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and 2012, respectively.

Our consolidated subsidiaries in China have enjoyed various tax holidays since 2000. Benefits under the tax holidays vary by jurisdiction.

In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, the amounts of and benefits from net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards may be impaired or limited in certain circumstances. Events which cause limitations in the amount of net operating losses or credits that we may utilize in any one year include, but are not limited to, a cumulative ownership change of more that 50% as defined, over a three year period.

As a result of the implementation of Interpretation 48, we recognized $16.4 million of liability for unrecognized tax benefits. Of this amount, none was accounted for as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. The amount decreased tax loss carryforwards in the U.S., which are fully offset by a valuation allowance.

70

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Income tax expense for the year ended December 31, 20132014 includes no interest and penalties. As of December 31, 2013,2014, we have no accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various states and foreign jurisdictions. We have substantially concluded all U.S. federal and state income tax matters through December 31, 2012.

2013.

Deferred tax liabilities have not been recognized for $57.7$67.6 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries at December 31, 2013.2014. We have made no provision for U.S. income taxes on undistributed earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries because it is our intention to permanently reinvest such earnings in its foreign subsidiaries. If such earnings were distributed, we would be subject to additional U.S. income tax expense. Determination of the amount of unrecognized deferred income tax liability related to these earnings is not practicable. As of December 31, 2013,2014, the company and its consolidated joint ventures hold approximately $18.7$18.3 million in cash and investments in foreign bank accounts of which are$13.9 million is not available for use in the United States without paying income taxes.


A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of the gross unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

Gross unrecognized tax benefits balance as of December 31, 2012 $16,403 
Add:    
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year   
Additions for tax positions of prior years   
Gross unrecognized tax benefits balance as of December 31, 2013 $16,403 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits balance as of December 31, 2013
$
16,403
 
Add:
 
 
 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year
 
 
Additions for tax positions of prior years
 
 
Gross unrecognized tax benefits balance as of December 31, 2014
$
16,403
 

Excluding the effects of recorded valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, $16.4 million of the unrecognized tax benefit would favorably impact the effective tax rate in future periods if recognized.


Note 14. Net Income per Share

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted net income per share calculations is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Numerator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc
$
(1,388
)
$
(7,958
)
$
3,110
 
Less: Preferred stock dividends
 
(177
)
 
(177
)
 
(177
)
Net income (loss) to common stockholders
$
(1,565
)
$
(8,135
)
$
2,933
 
Denominator:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Weighted average common shares (basic)
 
32,452
 
 
32,700
 
 
32,144
 
Effect of dilutive securities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Common stock options
 
 
 
 
 
689
 
Restricted stock awards
 
 
 
 
 
32
 
Weighted average common shares (dilutive)
 
32,452
 
 
32,700
 
 
32,865
 
Basic net income (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to AXT, Inc
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.25
)
$
0.10
 
Net income to common stockholders
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.25
)
$
0.09
 
Diluted net income (loss) per share:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net income attributable to AXT, Inc
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.25
)
$
0.09
 
Net income to common stockholders
$
(0.05
)
$
(0.25
)
$
0.09
 
Options excluded from diluted net income per share as the impact is anti-dilutive
 
2,772
 
 
2,671
 
 
1,056
 
Restricted stock excluded from diluted net income per share as the impact is anti-dilutive
 
252
 
 
241
 
 
13
 

 
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
 
 
2013
  
2012
  
2011
 
Numerator: 
  
  
 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc $(7,958) $3,110  $20,320 
Less: Preferred stock dividends  (177)  (177)  (177)
Net income (loss) to common stockholders $(8,135) $2,933  $20,143 
Denominator:            
Weighted average common shares (basic)  32,700   32,144   31,872 
Effect of dilutive securities:            
Common stock options     689   1,093 
Restricted stock awards     32   96 
Weighted average common shares (dilutive)  32,700   32,865   33,061 
Basic net income (loss) per share:            
Net income attributable to AXT, Inc $(0.25) $0.10  $0.64 
Net income to common stockholders $(0.25) $0.09  $0.63 
Diluted net income (loss) per share:            
Net income attributable to AXT, Inc $(0.25) $0.09  $0.61 
Net income to common stockholders $(0.25) $0.09  $0.61 
Options excluded from diluted net income per share as the impact is anti-dilutive  2,671   1,056   478 
Restricted stock excluded from diluted net income per share as the impact is anti-dilutive  241   13   116 

71

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Note 15. Segment Information and Foreign Operations


Segment Information

We operate in one segment for the design, development, manufacture and distribution of high-performance compound semiconductor substrates and sale of materials. In accordance with ASC topic 280, Segment Reporting, our chief operating decision‑makerdecision-maker has been identified as the Chief Executive Officer, who reviews operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the Company. Since we operate in one segment, all financial segment and product line information can be found in the consolidated financial statements.


Product Type
The following table represents revenue amounts (in thousands) by product type:
 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
Product type: 
  
  
 
GaAs $40,234  $51,368  $63,697 
InP  7,128   6,024   5,182 
Ge  16,962   8,734   11,635 
Raw materials and other  21,011   22,248   23,607 
 
 $85,335  $88,374  $104,121 

Geographical Information

The following table represents revenue amounts (in thousands) reported for products shipped to customers in the corresponding geographic region:

 
 Years Ended December 31, 
 
 2013  2012  2011 
Product revenue: 
  
  
 
China  24,946   19,815   25,181 
Europe (primarily Germany)  21,387   18,170   21,082 
North America (primarily the United States) $10,665  $15,391  $20,471 
Taiwan  10,131   10,985   9,813 
Japan  9,041   9,346   13,749 
Asia Pacific (excluding China, Japan and Taiwan)  9,165   14,667   13,825 
 
 $85,335  $88,374  $104,121 

Years Ended December 31,
2014
2013
2012
Product revenue:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Europe (primarily Germany)
$
21,535
 
$
21,387
 
$
18,170
 
China
 
17,451
 
 
24,946
 
 
19,815
 
North America (primarily the United States)
 
10,292
 
 
10,665
 
 
15,391
 
Japan
 
11,550
 
 
9,041
 
 
9,346
 
Taiwan
 
11,464
 
 
10,131
 
 
10,985
 
Asia Pacific (excluding China, Japan and Taiwan)
 
11,207
 
 
9,165
 
 
14,667
 
$
83,499
 
$
85,335
 
$
88,374
 

Long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, and are attributed to the geographic location in which they are located. Long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows (in thousands):

 
 As of December 31, 
 
 2013  2012 
Long-lived assets: 
  
 
United States of America $204  $430 
China  37,417   36,805 
 
 $37,621  $37,235 

As of December 31,
2014
2013
Long-lived assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
United States of America
$
136
 
$
204
 
China
 
33,726
 
 
37,417
 
$
33,862
 
$
37,621
 

Note 16. Foreign Exchange Contracts and Transaction Gains/Losses

As of December 31, 2013,2014, and 2012,2013, we had no outstanding commitments with respect to foreign exchange contracts.

We incurred foreign currency transaction exchange losses which are included in “other income (expense), net” on the consolidated statements of operations of $1.0 million, $1.3 million $445,000 and $100,000$445,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Note 17. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Matters

We are subject to legal proceedings and claims, either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course of business. While the outcome of these proceedings and claims cannot be predicted with certainty, management does not believe that the outcome of any of these legal matters will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Leases

We lease certain office space, manufacturingwarehouse facilities and equipment under long-term operating leases expiring at various dates through February 2016.December 2025. The majority of our lease obligationobligations relates to our lease agreement for the facility atin Fremont, California with approximately 27,76019,467 square feetfeet. The original lease commenced on

72

TABLE OF CONTENTS

December 1, 2008 for a term of seven years, with an option by us to cancel the lease after five years, upon forfeiture of the security deposit and payment of one-half of the fifth year’s rent. On June 28, 2013, we sent a notice to terminate the lease effective November 30, 2013 with an early termination penalty of $142,000 which was recorded as an expense in the third quarter of 2013. On August 2, 2013, we signed a new lease agreement for the current facility with reduced footage of 20,767 square feet, which commenced on December 1, 2013 for a term of two years. The reduced square footage, the reduced rate per square foot, and the expected reduced operating costs, would save us approximately total $382,000 during 2014 and 2015. In September 2014, we signed an amendment to the current lease to further reduce square footage to 19,467 square feet and to extend the term of the lease two more years. Total rent expenses under these operating leases were $260,000, $638,000 $447,000 and $460,000$447,000 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 2012 and 2011,2012, respectively. Total minimum lease payments under these leases as of December 31, 20132014 are summarized below (in thousands):

 
 Lease Payments 
2014 $174 
2015  152 
2016  22 
2017  21 
Thereafter 68 
 
 $437 

Lease
Payments
2015
$
260
 
2016
 
165
 
2017
 
159
 
2018
 
30
 
2019
 
26
 
Thereafter
 
126
 
$
766
 

Royalty Agreement

We entered into a royalty agreement with a vendorcompetitor effective December 3, 2010 with a term of eight years, terminating December 31, 2018. We and our related companies are granted a worldwide, nonexclusive, royalty bearing, irrevocable license to certain patents for the term on the agreement. We shall pay a total of $7.0 million royalty payment over eight years that began in 2011 based on future royalty bearing sales. This agreement contains a clause that allows us to claim for credit, starting in 2013, in the event that the royalty bearing sales for the year is lower than a pre-determined amount set forth in this agreement. Royalty expense under this agreement was $577,000 which was net of claim for 2013 wascredit of $223,000 and $530,000 which was net of claim for credit of $270,000 and $1.4 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 20122014 and 2011, respectively, and2013, respectively. Royalty expense was $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. These expenses were included in cost of revenue. Total royalty payments under this agreement as of December 31, 20132014 are summarized below (in thousands):

Royalty
Payments
2015
 
800
 
2016
 
575
 
2017
 
575
 
2018
 
575
 
$
2,525
 

 
 Royalty Payments 
2014 $800 
2015  800 
2016  575 
2017  575 
2018  575 
 
 $3,325 

73

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Note 18. Unaudited Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data

 
 Quarter 
 
 First  Second  Third  Fourth 
 
 (in thousands, except per share data) 
2013: 
  
  
  
 
Revenue $22,380  $22,831  $20,521  $18,603 
Gross profit  3,484   3,085   2,446   2,813 
Net (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc  (2,400)  (2,035)  (2,295)  (1,228)
Net (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc per share, basic $(0.08) $(0.06) $(0.07) $(0.04)
Net (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc per share, diluted $(0.08) $(0.06) $(0.07) $(0.04)
2012:                
Revenue $23,486  $25,153  $20,808  $18,927 
Gross profit  8,194   7,508   5,466   3,684 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc  1,635   1,299   932   (756)
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc per share, basic $0.05  $0.04  $0.03  $(0.02)
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc per share, diluted $0.05  $0.04  $0.03  $(0.02)

Quarter
First
Second
Third
Fourth
(in thousands, except per share data)
2014:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
19,345
 
$
21,449
 
$
23,138
 
$
19,567
 
Gross profit
 
2,718
 
 
4,160
 
 
5,318
 
 
4,971
 
Net income (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc
 
(2,040
)
 
319
 
 
644
 
 
(311
)
Net (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc per share, basic
$
(0.06
)
$
0.01
 
$
0.02
 
$
(0.01
)
Net (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc per share, diluted
$
(0.06
)
$
0.01
 
$
0.02
 
$
(0.01
)
2013:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenue
$
22,380
 
$
22,831
 
$
20,521
 
$
18,603
 
Gross profit
 
3,484
 
 
3,085
 
 
2,446
 
 
2,813
 
Net (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc
 
(2,400
)
 
(2,035
)
 
(2,295
)
 
(1,228
)
Net (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc per share, basic
$
(0.08
)
$
(0.06
)
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.04
)
Net (loss) attributable to AXT, Inc per share, diluted
$
(0.08
)
$
(0.06
)
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.04
)

Note 19. Restructuring Charges

On February 25, 2014, we announced a restructuring plan with respect to our wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co, Ltd. (“Tongmei”) in order to better align manufacturing capacity with demand. Under the restructuring plan, Tongmei implemented certain workforce reductions with respect to its manufacturing facility in China. We also announced that the restructuring plan would be completed by March 31, 2014, depending on local legal requirements.

In the first quarter of 2014, we reduced the workforce at Tongmei by approximately 93 positions that were no longer required to support production and operations, or approximately 11 percent of the workforce. Accordingly, we recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $907,000 related to the reduction in force for severance-related expenses. As of March 31, 2014, we completed this restructuring plan and the reduction in force.

Note 19.20. Subsequent Events

On February 25, 2014, AXT, Inc. (the “Company”) approved a restructuring plan with respect23, 2015, the Board of Directors announced that, pursuant to its wholly-owned subsidiary, Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology Co, Ltd. (“Tongmei”)an anonymous whistleblower complaint, our Audit Committee has conducted an investigation of certain potential related-party transactions involving Davis Zhang, our President, China Operations. The investigation did not conclude that there was any intentional misconduct by Mr. Zhang, or that he received any improper benefit from these transactions. Further, the investigation did not reveal any inaccuracies in order to better align demand with manufacturing capacity.  Underour financial statements resulting from these transactions. However, the restructuring plan, Tongmei will implementinvestigation identified certain workforce reductions with respect to its manufacturing facilityhistorical related-party transactions that were not previously disclosed in China.  The Company expects to substantially complete the restructuring plan by March 31, 2014, depending on local legal requirements.  In connectionour filings with the restructuring plan,Securities and Exchange Commission. We have filed a Current Report on Form 8-K on February 23, 2015 to disclose such historical related-party transactions.

On February 20, 2015, the Company expectsBoard waived any potential inconsistencies with our Code of Conduct and Ethics arising from the transactions identified in the investigation. Also, the Audit Committee approved the related-party nature of such transactions to the extent it had not previously approved such transactions. The Board and Audit Committee specified that such waiver and approval would have retroactive effect to the date of commencement of the transactions covered by such waiver and approval. We expect to incur aggregate pre-tax restructuring charges comprised of severance and other termination benefitsadditional professional services expense related to the investigation of approximately $900,000, but the charges could range from $850,000 to $1.1$1.2 million all of which are currently expected to be recorded in the first fiscal quarter of 2014.

2015.


74

SIGNATURES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.

AXT, Inc.
By:
/s/ MORRIS S. YOUNGGARY L. FISCHER
Morris S. Young
Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Secretary

(Interim Principal Financial Officer)

Date: March 14, 2014

13, 2015

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below hereby constitutes and appoints Morris S. Young and Gary L. Fischer, and each of them, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution, each with power to act alone, to sign and execute on behalf of the undersigned any and all amendments to this Report on Form 10-K, and to perform any acts necessary in order to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requested and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or their or his or her substitutes, shall do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature
Title
Title
Date
/s/ MORRIS S. YOUNG
Chief Executive Officer and DirectorMarch 14, 201413, 2015
Morris S. Young
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ MORRIS S. YOUNGGARY L. FISCER
Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate SecretaryMarch 14, 201413, 2015
Morris S. YoungGary L. Fischer
(Interim Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ JESSE CHEN
Chairman of the Board of DirectorsMarch 14, 201413, 2015
Jesse Chen
/s/ DAVID C. CHANG
DirectorMarch 14, 201413, 2015
David C. Chang
/s/ LEONARD LEBLANC
DirectorMarch 14, 201413, 2015
Leonard LeBlanc
/s/ NAI-YU PAI
DirectorMarch 14, 201413, 2015
Nai-yu Pai

75

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AXT, Inc.

EXHIBITS

TO

FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

For the Year Ended December 31, 2013

2014

Exhibit

Number
Description
3.1(1)Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.2(2)Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation
3.3(3)Certificate of Amendment to the Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.4(4)Certificate of Designation, Preferences and Rights of Series A Preferred Stock (which is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the registrant’s form 8-K dated
May 28, 1999).
3.5(5)Second Amended and Restated By Laws
3.6(6)Amended and Restated Section 5.1 of Article V of the Second Amended and Restated Bylaws of AXT, Inc.
3.7(7)Certificate of Amendment to By Laws
4.1(8)Rights Agreement dated April 24, 2001 by and between AXT, Inc. and ComputerShare Trust Company, Inc.
10.1(9)*Form of Indemnification Agreement for directors and officers
10.2(10)*1997 Stock Option Plan and forms of agreements thereunder
10.3(11)Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Limar Realty Corp #23 and AXT, Inc. dated April 1998
10.4(12)Bond Purchase Contract between Dain Rauscher Incorporated and AXT, Inc. dated December 1, 1998
10.5(13)Remarketing Agreement between Dain Rauscher Incorporated and AXT, Inc. dated December 1, 1998
10.6(14)Reimbursement Agreement between Wells Fargo Bank National Association and AXT, Inc. dated April 7, 2003
10.7(15)Asset purchase agreements dated September 4, 2003 by and between Dalian Luming Science and Technology Group, Ltd and AXT, Inc. and by and between Lumei Optoelectronics Corp., AXT, Inc., Lyte Optronics, Inc., Beijing Tongmei Xtal Technology and Xiamen Advanced Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
10.8(16)*Agreement respecting severance payment between the Company and Dr. Morris S. Young.
10.9(17)*Employment agreement between the Company and Mr. Davis Zhang
10.10(18)Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Car West Auto Body, Inc., a California corporation and AXT, Inc. dated February 19, 2008
10.11(19)Lease agreement dated July 2, 2008 between AXT, Inc. and T. Drive Partners, L.P., a California partnership
10.12(20)**6-inch Supply Agreement dated December 31, 2008 between AXT, Inc. and IQE plc
10.13(21)**4-inch Supply Agreement dated December 31, 2008 between AXT, Inc. and IQE plc
10.14(22)2007 Equity Incentive Plan (amended December 8, 2008)
10.15(23)*Forms of agreements under the 2007 Equity Incentive Plan
10.16(24)*Employment Letter Agreement between the Company and Mr. Raymond Low
10.17(25)*Employment Letter Agreement between the Company and Mr. Davis Zhang
10.18(26)*Employment Letter Agreement between the Company and Mr. Robert G. Ochrym
10.19(27)*10.19*20102015 Executive Bonus Plan
10.20(28)10.20(27)**Supply Agreement signed January 29, 2010 between AXT, Inc. and AZUR SPACE Solar Power GmbH
10.21(29)*2011 Executive Bonus Plan
10.22(30)*2012 Executive Bonus Plan
10.23*2013 Executive Bonus Plan
10.24(31)10.24(28)Credit Line Account Application and Agreement for Organizations and Businesses between AXT, Inc. and UBS Bank USA dated December 15, 2008
10.25(32)10.25(29)Notice of Credit Line Account Increase between AXT, Inc. and UBS Bank USA dated January 17, 2012
10.26(33)10.26(30)*Amended and Restated Employment Offer Letter between the Company and Dr. Morris S. Young dated December 4, 2012
10.27*Employment Letter Agreement between the Company and Mr. Gary L. Fischer
12.1Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
21.1(34)21.1(31)List of Subsidiaries
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Burr Pilger Mayer, Inc
24.1Power of Attorney (see signature page)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

31.1Exhibit
Number
Description
31.1Certification by principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification by principal financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes‑OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification by Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Certification by Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes‑OxleySarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS†XBRL Instance.
101.SCH†XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
101.CAL†XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
101.DEF†XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition LinkbaseLinkbase.
101.LAB†XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE†XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.


(1)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 1999.
(2)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 14, 2000.
(3)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.4 to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with SEC on August 5, 2004.
(4)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 14, 1999.
(5)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.4 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 30, 2001.
(6)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.2 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 1, 2007.
(7)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to registrant’s Form 8‑K8-K filed with the SEC on October 26, 2010.
(8)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.2 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 30, 2001.
(9)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on March 17, 1998.
(10)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.3 to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed with the SEC on March 17, 1998.
(11)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.7 to registrant’s Registration Statement on Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 filed with the SEC on May 11, 1998.
(12)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.10 to registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 1999.
(13)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.11 to registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 1999.
(14)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.15 to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 9, 2003.
(15)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 to registrant’s Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 13, 2003.
(16)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.1 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 30, 2005.
(17)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 99.1 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 17, 2006.
(18)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.25 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 20, 2008.
(19)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.28 to registrant’s Form 8‑K8-K filed with the SEC on July 8, 2008.
(20)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.29 to registrant’s Form 8‑K8-K filed with the SEC on January 5, 2009.
(21)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.30 to registrant’s Form 8‑K8-K filed with the SEC on January 5, 2009.
(22)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.31 to registrant’s Form 10‑K10-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009.
(23)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.20 to registrant’s Form 10‑K10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2010.
(24)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to registrant’s Form 10‑K10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2010.
(25)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 to registrant’s Form 10‑K10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2010.
(26)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.24 to registrant’s Form 10‑K10-K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2010.
(27)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.25 to registrant’s Form 10‑K filed with the SEC on March 22, 2010.
(28)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.31 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 2, 2010.
(29)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.21 to registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 16, 2011.
(30)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.22 to registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012.
 (31)(28)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.23 to registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012.
(32)(29)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.24 to registrant’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 15, 2012.
(33)(30)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.1 to registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 4, 2012.
(34)(31)Incorporated by reference to exhibit 21.1 to registrant’s Registration Statement on Amendment No. 1 to
Form S-3 filed with the SEC on July 28, 2006.
*Management contract or compensatory plan.
**Confidential treatment has been requested of the SEC for portions of the exhibit.
XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and is otherwise not subject to liability under these sections.